Slashdot Mirror

Hillary was endorsed by the KKK in California. One of Trump's children is Jewish, and he has Jewish advisors. Trump has reached out to the Black community and appointed non-whites to important and visible government positions. Think about that.

Trump signs order supporting historically black colleges

These Charlotte kids named their rocket Trump and went to DC. Guess who took notice?
closer look

Meet the Jews in Donald Trump’s administration

Who is Nikki Haley, America's ambassador to the United Nations?

Don't be an ass.

Since this about the inventor of the curl, this is obviously a slap in the face to Arnold Schwarzenegger by the Trump administration.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/24/schwarzenegger-and-macron-vow-make-planet-great-ag/

Are you familiar with the concept of self-fornication?

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

Hillary Clinton cost 1,2 billion US dollars (probably more).

The Clinton campaign, Democratic Party and pro-Clinton expenditure committees and PACs spent a record $1.2 billion, twice as much as the $600 million laid out by the Trump camp, Republicans and pro-Trump groups, the New York Post reported.

The latest Federal Election Commission figures back Mr. Trump’s assertion six months ago that there was no need for him to amass at least $1 billion to run a successful race against the former Secretary of State, given the former reality television star’s ability to draw free media.

Clinton’s expensive machine tore through $131.8 million in just the final weeks, finishing with about $839,000 on hand as of Nov. 28.

Team Trump spent $94.5 million in the home stretch — from Oct. 20 to Nov. 28 — and had $7.6 million left.

The figures include all spending by the campaigns, PACs and party committees.

Trump contributed $66 million from his own pocket, $34 million less than he estimated he would shell out.

Those were his prepared statements. What he said during questioning was:

“At one point, [Ms. Lynch] directed me not to call it an ‘investigation’ but instead to call it a ‘matter,’ which confused me and concerned me,” Mr. Comey said of Ms. Lynch. “That was one of the bricks in the load that led me to conclude I have to step away from the department if we are to close this case credibly.”

Mr. Comey said the language suggested by Ms. Lynch was troublesome because it closely mirrored what the Clinton campaign was using.

Acknowledging that he didn’t know whether it was intentional, Mr. Comey said Ms. Lynch’s request “gave the impression the attorney general was looking to align the way we talked about our investigation with the way a political campaign was describing the same activity.”

Mr. Comey told lawmakers that Ms. Lynch’s intervention was a key factor in his decision to buck Justice Department tradition and publicly announce in July the details of Mrs. Clinton’s case and why he decided on his own not to bring a legal case against the former first lady.

Quote source

And if you don't care for that one:

Another.
And another.

The evidence of tampering with the justice system by Loretta Lynch was far more damning than the evidence of Trump.

The hysteria surrounding this is just bread and circuses. Even Macron says Russia didn't meddle in their election, despite the accusations. It's just like Hillary to be the sore loser to continue beating the dead horse story.

Someone even left their dogs and recently born puppies in the pile of stuff to burn.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...

I don't know why you're being voted down, because many of the protesters were proven to be paid:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/17/standing-rock-took-375000-from-wind-farm-industry-/

They left their tents and gear behind (and yes some trash)

That is totally wrong. They left over 200 cars, with all of the leaking fluids you'd expect from cars too worn to take away. They did not leave "some trash", they left 48 million pounds of trash. That is not a typo, that is from the The North Dakota Department of Emergency Services who hand to pay for carting that off (over $1 million taxpayers had to pay).

But frankly what I thought was even worse (even though destroying hundreds of acres of grass and deeply polluting the watershed was bad enough), they also abandoned dogs - remember this was in winter, in sub-zero temperatures. That is the kind of SCUM you are supporting. Between fields of leaking cars and abandoned animals (may of which died BTW), How can you claim those are environmentalists of any form?

At the time I left a large donation to the local animal shelter that had to handle the nonsense, you may want to consider doing the same as an act on contrition.

I forgot to include the link about Standing Rock protestors leaving literal tons of pollution behind.

Reminder - the Standing Rock protests were NOT just some ecologically minded people trying to stop a big corporation. They were a group backed by paid protestors with motives to stopping other energy sources. No-one ever looked into the full extent of who was paying for so many people to be able to camp out in the remote area for so long.

They were a group of money who caused vastly more pollution than they prevented (including to the water supply they were supposedly protecting!), so pretty obviously they were not ACTUALLY there to protect the environment but for other purposes, or at best as tools of groups interested in keeping energy prices high (hello Russia/Saudi Arabia).

This. Standard procedure when clicking any cnn/wapo/nyt "BREAKING NEWS BOMBSHELL TRUMP'S A TRAITOR ZOMG IMPEACH!!!" story is to immediately scroll to the very end of the article, find the inevitable "Everything that we just spent 50 paragraphs violently implying is high treason (because hate and paranoia get us way more clicks than straight news) is actually completely normal and legal and there's still zero evidence Trump's a Soviet sleeper agent" caveat, and then close the tab.

Hillary blamed her campaign team (as well as the Russian boogeyman) for her loss - she blamed her team for not getting her message out:

http://www.businessinsider.com...

She couldn't manage her own campaign team, yet we are expected to believe that she could run the entire US Executive branch?

Let me guess - you voted for Gary (Aleppo) Johnson? - I'm a Libertarian and even I couldn't pull the lever for him after he threw Austin Peterson's gift pistol into the trash.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

It's easy to find fault in President Trump, but stop acting like we passed over Einstein,The Dalai Lama, and Mother Teresa to elect him.

No more so than when a liberal professor at Drexel College called for white geocide. Or a co-founder of a Black Lives Matter chapter calls for the same. Those are hate speech as well? Should we prosecute them for their speech as well?

No BS at all, we have an oligarchy, not a functioning democracy.

And we never intended to have a democracy, but rather a constitutional republic, which is a very important distinction.

I'm not an anti-gun nut, unless you care to characterize yourself as a pro-gun nut. I don't care if you want to keep a gun for self-defense in your house, or go hunting, or go to the shooting range. I just don't see why you have to walk down the street brandishing a rifle claiming that it is some sort of Second Amendment right.

Anyway, they weren't "just walking around". It was an organized protest, and they were brandishing loaded guns. A person purposefully demonstrating their ability to shoot someone at any time is intimating violence. It is a warning and therefore a threat to do violence.

Interestingly, these guys were able to make their point without carrying around loaded firearms,
http://www.washingtontimes.com...

I take it as sarcasm, considering that the lastest "Hillary lost the 2016 election because of ______" meme has been "James Comey re-opened the investigation against Hillary just days prior to the election"

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

So now, all of the Democrats are happy, right?

In other words, schools are now allowed to serve stuff that kids will actually eat again, making afternoon class teachers and any student with afterschool activities happy again. http://www.washingtontimes.com...

In other words, we're reverting back because the "kids" say so.

Next years menu will include a pound of bacon-flavored ice cream with Ritalin sprinkles for breakfast, along with bong hits and an afternoon nap for lunch. I mean, whatever makes them happy, right?

Perhaps we should try and remember why we wait until a human mind is at least 18 years old before labeling it an "adult". Children quite often make fucking stupid decisions, which includes food choices (like throwing away fruits and vegetables).

The only thing this decision truly caters to is the Medical Industrial Complex, who will be raking in billions treating the ignorant masses who are obese and diabetic.

Really - the same Google who manipulated their search engine to bury news that were damaging to the Clinton campaign is now promising to protect us from fake news?

Frankly with Google's record of integrity, I don't trust them to decide for me what is fake news.

Not to mention Trump has stepped up the bombing in that region, something his supporters said Clinton would do but Trump wouldn't.

That's hardly fair. Trump may have indicated he'd pull back from the region, but he also very clearly stated that he'd "bomb the shit out of ’em.". You can't corner Trump like this. He holds every position.

He also stated he'd have Snowden killed - so why would we have assumed he wouldn't go after Assange? Assange was a real asset during the campaign, but probably quite a liability now that it's over.

They reported facts. You just don't like the facts.

Just the facts they want you to hear, of course http://www.washingtontimes.com...

They are high. They're just not as high as other countries who get these things even more wrong than the United States. Of course, the OECD, which just spends all their time and money (tax-funded, by the way) talking about how much better life would be if taxes were higher, published the report. Heck, they want to create a global tax cartel to eliminate tax competition. I don't question the report's accuracy. It's just irrelevant. Some people, including myself, believe taxes in the US are too high. 32% percent of my income (according to the report) is way too much to fund an institution whose only legitimate job is protection of its citizens from violent confrontations with each other and foreign aggressors. What other countries do is irrelevant.

Whether Google really is violating the law, the prosecution itself is a convenient means of suppressing opposition. Google was "with her" all the way. Could this be a payback from the Trump's Administration?

Or, the other way around, has the previous Administration sat on it because Google was all for the Democratics? Worse, maybe, Google's unprecedented cooperation was due to the subtle blackmail in the first place?

Whatever the answers to these questions, I'd rather they not be asked at all — there should be no thoughtcrimes for the government to prosecute. At all.

Discrimination may be stupid and unethical, but it should not be illegal.

Or you have real world examples like the head of the Idaho Democratic party that stated un-ironically: "shut other white people down".

Perhaps you should step outside of your echo chamber.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

....lets be clear: aside from USSC judges, Democrats had already in 2013 used 'the nuclear option' to remove the filibuster-ability for pretty much every OTHER appointment:

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

The mainstream media were all for the âoenuclear optionâ when it was Democrats doing the nuking.
The press showered praise upon the Senate for removing the filibuster for lower-court judicial nominees and executive appointments in 2013 in the effort spearheaded by then-Majority Leader Harry Reid.
MSNBCâ(TM)s Rachel Maddow assured her viewers at the time that âoejudges can be blocked on an up-or-down vote, a majority vote, like always.
âoeBut they cannot be blocked anymore by just a minority of votes,â Ms. Maddow said, reported the Media Research Centerâ(TM)s NewsBusters. âoeRepublicans cannot force that anymore.â
MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes similarly hailed the 2013 development as âoean affirmative win for democracy,â while his colleague Al Sharpton said âoeDemocrats took the bold step of changing Senate rules, scaling back the filibuster that Republicans have unfairly used to block the presidentâ(TM)s nominees.â
CNN commentator Marc Lamont Hill said Republicans should have taken the Senate back if the party wanted to preserve the filibuster."

This should be illegal unless someone can prove that the hacked firmware is safe.

You got the wrong country. It shall be legal, until someone can prove it is unsafe. And not just unsafe, but substantially unsafer than the original.

And even then free citizens of a free country should be free to endanger themselves however they wish — be it with alcohol, firearms, drugs, or "unapproved" farm equipment.

All that said, I suspect, John Deere are privately happy with the situation — they get to sell more tractors this way. Thanks to this "Ukrainian firmware", you can buy them with or without the warranty — a choice, no doubt, made illegal (or very costly) by earlier regulatory and/or legal rulings. Such as this one.

Get with The Narrative, dude. No Muslim bakery in America has ever refused to make a gay wedding cake.

But what if "The Narrative" was wrong?

we have lots of examples of representatives of other governments influencing our election. Trudeau spoke out for Hillary and against Trump.

I've got an even better example: The Obama Administration gave $350K to help Netanyahu's opponent win the election. The official claim was that they had absolutely no idea that the money would be used to influence the election, despite the fact that the group had sent an email describing their plan to Consul General Michael Ratney. Mr. Ratney's explanation is that he deleted their email without reading it because it was large.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/12/obama-admin-sent-taxpayer-money-oust-netanyahu/

The liberals have a habit of demanding that prominent Republicans should publicly denounce things. I'd like to find all the people advancing this "Russian hacking" thing and ask them whether they will denounce the Obama Administration's efforts to interfere in the election in Israel. (I'll bet they won't, even though they could just lie and say they do disapprove. Just like all the SJW's knew that Obama was lying when he claimed to be against gay marriage while running for President, the people pushing this Russian hacking thing could claim that they are against all governments interfering with elections even though they really just don't want it to be done to them.)

Assume Putin personally haxx0red the DNC and phished Podesta. What would he need to collude with the Trump campaign for?

The theory I favor: Putin and everyone else in Russia expected Hillary Clinton to win the election; the plan wasn't to use nefarious means to make Trump win, but to lay groundwork for applying pressure against her.

There's this idea going around that Russia wanted President Trump because he's a big fat idiot and they will have an easy time pushing him around. Yet Hillary has done all sorts of things that would open her up to blackmail, while Trump has so far been about as easy to push around as a bull in a china shop. (Even if you deplore what's happening to the china shop, you have to admit the bull is not easy to push around.)

circa 2014:
‘Interceptor’ cellphone towers found near White House, Senate

By Douglas Ernst - The Washington Times - Thursday, September 18, 2014

Mysterious “interceptor” cellphone towers that can listen in someone’s phone call despite not being part of any phone networks have turned up near the White House and Senate.

A company that specializes in selling secure mobile phones discovered the existence of several of the towers in and around the nation’s capitol.

“It’s highly unlikely that federal law enforcement would be using mobile interceptors near the Senate,” ESD America CEO Les Goldsmith told the technology website Venture Beat on Thursday. ...
Goldsmith told the site he passed along the information he’d uncovered to the Federal Communications Commission.

Hmmm...

It takes a special kind of idiot to (a) regard the 'media' as a monolithic entity (all the same people, sure!) and (b) heavily imply that Trump doesn't lie. Seriously.... LOL.

It takes a special kind of idiot to not see that there are organizations like Journolist around which exist to drive ideological narratives. That the media has been caught doing this numerous times. Including in other media like games media(see gamejournopros) Or media groups which will publish political propaganda directly from political parties as gospel truths. The DNC did that with multiple media organizations in the last election. The Obama administration did that multiple times, it became so common that the WH Press corps., openly wrote a letter about it. In most of the west, the 4th estate is broken and the people in it, are nothing but puppet mouthpieces trading favors for favors.

Now it's time for you to understand the difference when "Trump says something" and when an entire arm of a political party uses their weight in order to push an ideological view point, and the media accepts it as truth and repeats it. Or turns around and forwards it to the party in question to ensure it has ideological purity. Keep in mind, that in the beltway +90% of the reporters are democrat voters, donate directly to the DNC, and hold either democrat or progressive views. That drops to 80% outside of the beltway. Time for you to grow up a bit perhaps, and realize just how much institutional power the left has held for decades and why there is such a backlash brewing across the west.

What absolute bollocks. Replace the word "gold" with any other element and your entire 'justification' remains just as valid. Not to mention the fact that an 'ounce' is an arbitrary measure of anything. That the price of 'one' (an arbitrary amount) bitcoin has surpassed the price of one ounce (arbitrary measure) of gold (arbitrary element, one of many that we consider 'valuable') is even less notable than the clock ticking over from one year to another, in our arbitrarily decided calendar.

Some things are more arbitrary than others.

Factcheck.org are currently a bunch of progressive shills and liars. Their name is currently an oxymoron. They should be called conflate_and_confuse.shill. You fell into their trap of conflating gun homicides with homicides (GUN HOMICIDES != ALL HOMICIDES). If you get murdered, you don't care what killed you, you are just unhappy because you were murdered. I will say it slowly for all the libtards in the audience. In all of the concealed carry states, when gun ownership/legal carry was made more/available, the TOTAL HOMICIDE RATE AND TOTAL VIOLENT CRIME RATES WENT DOWN, A LOT (25-35% OR MORE). CONCEALED CARRY BY LAW ABIDING CITIZENS DETERS CRIME EFFECTIVELY, USUALLY WITHOUT THE DISCHARGE OF THE FIREARM...

http://www.washingtontimes.com...
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015...

Conversely, when the UK/Ireland/Jamaica/Washington DC/Chicago banned firearms, their murder and/or violent crime rates all spiked up markedly... Progressives, put down your reality distortion field. No one is buying your bullshit anymore. Citizens should be able to concealed carry as spelled out in the constitution for the same reason that police officers carry: firearms are very good at projecting superior force over a distance.

http://crimeresearch.org/2013/...

It looks to me like Eric Taylor's sentence wasn't for the swatting incident, and it was a plea bargain.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...

From the linked article:

A teenager hacker was sentenced in D.C. federal court Wednesday for a slew of cybercrimes committed against President Trump, Michelle Obama and former CIA Director John Brennan, among others.

Mr. Taylor and multiple co-conspirators are accused by the government of illegally obtaining personal information from high-profile victims and publishing it on a website, Exposed.Su, in 2013. He pleaded guilty last year to related charges and was sentenced at 2 p.m. Wednesday by U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in Washington, D.C., The Times has learned.

Allegations against Mr. Taylor and others charged in the conspiracy were filed under seal, and Wednesday’s sentencing hearing was not listed on the court’s website. Details of the sentencing were confirmed to The Times by individuals familiar with the case but not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.

Because everything is sealed, I suspect that the defense attorney's threatened to use the trial to dump into the public record everything that Eric et al had stolen, and that would be harmful to the high-profile people they hacked. Hence the light sentence and plea bargain.

He tells me that even adjusted for population, fewer blacks are killed by police than whites.

He's close. You have to adjust for population and crime rates. Black Lies Matter is bullshit, racist, and divisive politicking by radical left-wing agitators.

This is what he means by a few alt-right spewing lies.

Don't let reality hurt you. It's a very harsh mistress. When you decide to look, you can also note how the tone of media has changed as it's been consolidated into particular hands. I recommend the washington post as a starting point, then move onto NBC.

Yeah, we're trying to prevent that BEFORE it happens, not after.

Too bad it's already happening isn't it? That it's been going on for years. That you can look at Germany and see the government leaning on media and police not to report statistics. That one can look at Sweden where police officers are threatened with "racism" charges for reporting facts. Where the governments make demands of social media to censor things which are contrary to the presented viewpoint. Or police threaten and dox people for not wanting refugees in their backyard, or having particular points of view on sexuality. Or universities and student unions engaging in no-platforming, or threatening speakers because their view points no longer fit the radical agendas that are being pushed. Yes, very much trying to prevent what's already happening and encouraging a "further" counter-pendulum swing with your actions.

So let me get this straight: a judge rules that since Microsoft in WA state relies on H-1B Visa slave labor—and Microsoft constitutes a large chunk of the WA state tax base—therefore the federal H-1B slave labor program cannot be suspended in the U.S. in any way because that would adversely impact some states' economies.

Didn't we already fight one civil war over this sort of issue? And this ruling was issued during Black History Month?

Consider my mind officially boggled by the blatant irony of this decision.

P.S. Lest you imagine I am just trolling, this was ironically the same appeals judge who proclaimed that “Black Lives Matter” in a hearing involving Seattle police reform.
Ref: http://www.washingtontimes.com...
...... Just sayin'. This judge has a tendency to preach from the bench.

It depends if George Soros funds the protests or not.

George Soros (Hillarys primary financer) instructing Hillary on what policies to carry out as Secretary of State:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/28972

https://i.sli.mg/64gA6D.png

Top contributors for Hillary Clinton page:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000019&type=f

Soros admits creating the European migrant crisis:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/02/soros-admits-involvement-in-migrant-crisis-national-borders-are-the-obstacle/

Soros tells Europe to take in at least a MILLION refugees every year:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/616541/European-Union-Migrants-Refugees-George-Soros-Hungary-Viktor-Orban-Europe

Soros finances Handbooks to spur EU-bound immigration:

http://news.sky.com/story/1551853/sky-finds-handbook-for-eu-bound-migrants

Soros urges giving Ukraine $50 billion of aid to foil Russia:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-soros-idUSKBN0KH0NQ20150108

Hacked emails expose George Soros as Ukraine puppet-master:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-01/hacked-emails-expose-george-soros-ukraine-puppet-master

George Soros funds Ferguson Black Lives Matter protests:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

Soros funds paid "protestors" to spur civil unrest:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ferguson-Missouri-paid-protesters/2015/05/25/id/646587/

Soros funds MoveOn and Media Matters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Matters_for_America#Funding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoveOn.org#Financial_contributors

Soros funds Black Lives Matter:

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2015/11/13/anti-american-left-funds-blacklivesmatter-now/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/19/hired-black-lives-matter-protesters-start-cutthech/

Globalists Unite: Hillary Clinton Running Mate Tim Kaine Dines with George Soros Son as Donald Trumps Rise Terrifies World Elite:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/12/globalists-unite-hillary-clinton-running-mate-tim-k

It depends if George Soros funds the protests or not.

George Soros (Hillarys primary financer) instructing Hillary on what policies to carry out as Secretary of State:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/28972

https://i.sli.mg/64gA6D.png

Top contributors for Hillary Clinton page:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000019&type=f

Soros admits creating the European migrant crisis:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/02/soros-admits-involvement-in-migrant-crisis-national-borders-are-the-obstacle/

Soros tells Europe to take in at least a MILLION refugees every year:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/616541/European-Union-Migrants-Refugees-George-Soros-Hungary-Viktor-Orban-Europe

Soros finances Handbooks to spur EU-bound immigration:

http://news.sky.com/story/1551853/sky-finds-handbook-for-eu-bound-migrants

Soros urges giving Ukraine $50 billion of aid to foil Russia:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-soros-idUSKBN0KH0NQ20150108

Hacked emails expose George Soros as Ukraine puppet-master:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-01/hacked-emails-expose-george-soros-ukraine-puppet-master

George Soros funds Ferguson Black Lives Matter protests:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

Soros funds paid "protestors" to spur civil unrest:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ferguson-Missouri-paid-protesters/2015/05/25/id/646587/

Soros funds MoveOn and Media Matters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Matters_for_America#Funding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoveOn.org#Financial_contributors

Soros funds Black Lives Matter:

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2015/11/13/anti-american-left-funds-blacklivesmatter-now/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/19/hired-black-lives-matter-protesters-start-cutthech/

Globalists Unite: Hillary Clinton Running Mate Tim Kaine Dines with George Soros Son as Donald Trumps Rise Terrifies World Elite:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/12/globalists-unite-hillary-clinton-running-mate-tim-k

It depends if George Soros funds the protests or not.

George Soros (Hillarys primary financer) instructing Hillary on what policies to carry out as Secretary of State:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/28972

https://i.sli.mg/64gA6D.png

Top contributors for Hillary Clinton page:

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/contrib.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000019&type=f

Soros admits creating the European migrant crisis:

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/02/soros-admits-involvement-in-migrant-crisis-national-borders-are-the-obstacle/

Soros tells Europe to take in at least a MILLION refugees every year:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/616541/European-Union-Migrants-Refugees-George-Soros-Hungary-Viktor-Orban-Europe

Soros finances Handbooks to spur EU-bound immigration:

http://news.sky.com/story/1551853/sky-finds-handbook-for-eu-bound-migrants

Soros urges giving Ukraine $50 billion of aid to foil Russia:

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-soros-idUSKBN0KH0NQ20150108

Hacked emails expose George Soros as Ukraine puppet-master:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-01/hacked-emails-expose-george-soros-ukraine-puppet-master

George Soros funds Ferguson Black Lives Matter protests:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

Soros funds paid "protestors" to spur civil unrest:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ferguson-Missouri-paid-protesters/2015/05/25/id/646587/

Soros funds MoveOn and Media Matters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Matters_for_America#Funding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoveOn.org#Financial_contributors

Soros funds Black Lives Matter:

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2015/11/13/anti-american-left-funds-blacklivesmatter-now/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/14/george-soros-funds-ferguson-protests-hopes-to-spur/?page=all

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/19/hired-black-lives-matter-protesters-start-cutthech/

Globalists Unite: Hillary Clinton Running Mate Tim Kaine Dines with George Soros Son as Donald Trumps Rise Terrifies World Elite:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/12/globalists-unite-hillary-clinton-running-mate-tim-k

-I don't care what you believe.

-Citation provided.
-since race is an artificial construct anyway, it's as good a word as any to describe bigotry against a distinct cultural ethnic group a more concise term is coined
-debatable; migration rights are largely seen as a basic human right. and they still have rights under the constitution, particularly in the area of due process, the constitution being a document that describes not just the relation between the government and citizen, but more accurately the government and any person subject to its authority.

-torture is a war crime
-so is retaliatory executions, even the uber-conservative and generally delusional Washington times agrees
-so is the targeting of families

-your views on women, looks, and what constitutes hypocrisy don't even merit a response. but I will say, you should start by looking up the definition of hypocrisy

-citation already provided

-Yes he is, though I can see how its hard for you to see, when you willfully ignore and dismiss everything he's done, as you have in the above mentioned topics.

Mocking the diabled: Video, 45 seconds long: http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2...

Trump racism: Let's start with 1973 charges of discrimination in housing, then work forward to 2016 where he said the Central Park Five should go to jail DESPITE DNA evidence exonerating them, with all sorts of gems along the way. http://fortune.com/2016/06/07/... Oh... and then there's the famous quote about Mexicans. And suggesting a blanket ban on Muslims as a category.

Advocating for war crimes: March 2016, defending ordering the US military to commit war crimes of killing non-combatants that are family members of those in combat http://www.washingtontimes.com... Also advocates for waterboarding and worse in several interviews and speeches.

Regarding treatment of women: Ah, the famous "grab them by the pussy" video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

The Clinton Global Initiative also helped pay for Chelsea's wedding.

They're also shutting it down as foreign investors withdraw their donations. The jaundiced eye can't help assuming that it's because the foreign investors no longer feel the need to curry favor with the Clinton family.

The Trump administration will be no different.

That is kind of funny, since as recently as 6 years ago Trump was a member of the DNC.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...

But sure, let's hold up Trump as the absolute peak of racism. The man who didn't speak out against any race (black, white and asian are races, muslim and hispanic are not).

Gotta love all the butt hurt progressives modding me down as troll. I guess that's their form of "tolerance".

I am an American, but from what I understand, Brexit was all about British sovereignty and money. The UK already has a budding non-integrated immigrant problem, not as bad as France or Germany, but they hardly want more "refuges" coming in at a time when it is well known that ISIS sleepers are infiltrating their ranks. As far as money goes, the UK was sending 13B pounds to the EU and only getting 4.5B back in benefits. Further, EU rules and regulations are stifling the European economy and prices on many basic commodities are jacked up by the EU above global levels in certain regions including the EU. Leaving the EU means the UK gets to control it's own destiny on regulations and subsidies.

http://www.washingtontimes.com...
https://fullfact.org/europe/ou...

Security experts have been warning of possible foreign hacking for decades. But why this sudden spate of "Russia hacked X" stories now? Why not back when our Secretary of State was running an illegal, private, unsecured email server through which she transmitted classified information?

Simple: The Washington Post wanted Hillary to win the Presidential election, and reminding people how her action made it easier for Russian hackers to gain access to classified information wouldn't have helped her. But publishing it now helps support the false narrative that the Russians were behind the DNC leaks, not disgruntled Democratic Party staffers, and thus supposedly harms President-elect Donald Trump, whom the Washington Post and it's employees almost universally loath. That's the entire reason the story is being written and published now.

Further reading here and here.

What do you think the under/over is for MSM "Russian Hacking" stories between now and January 20?

I'm sure the Russian government recruits computer talent in the many ways listed in the article. I would suspect the U.S. government does much the same.

The fake part comes in: Why publish this piece now? Why not, say, during the massive OPM breach?

Simple: Publishing it during the OPM breach would have harmed Obama, whom the New York Times and it's employees almost universally adore, while publishing it now helps prop up the false narrative that the Russians were behind the DNC leaks, not a disgruntled Democratic Party insider, and thus supposedly harms President-elect Donald Trump, whom the New York Times and it's employees almost universally loath.

Remember, among the revelations to come out just after the election were how the Times abandoned objectivity to go after Trump and how the entire newsroom is dedicated to driving a predetermined narrative rather than carrying out an objective search for truth.

This story was published because it fits an (unproven and probably false) narrative that Russia "hacked the election" because it theoretically harms Trump.

Further reading here and here.

Prison without trials:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Indefinite solitary confinement:
https://www.amnestyusa.org/res...

Spying on all citizens:
https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

Current government supports executions of whistleblowers:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-po...
http://www.washingtontimes.com...

Executing citizens without a trial:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

Just to name a few.

Doesn't change the reality - Podesta's email was not hacked. As for stirring up the China-Taiwan situation, it should be. China is going to have a larger military than the US at some point, so either stand by your allies now, or you'll end up with even less credibility, same as Obama kept drawing "big red lines" that shouldn't be crossed, and when the barrel bombs and the chemical warfare started, did absolutely NOTHING.

And you're ignoring the facts if you claim that the DNC process wasn't rigged, you're being wilfully ignorant. resigned over it and was immediately hired by clinton. But first, she tried to muzzle MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski, demanding he resign after he complained about the DNC's bias against Sanders.

As for Sanders scaring people to the republicans, give me a break. Polls showed Sanders with a 20 point lead over Trump. The only reason many people voted for Trump was because they couldn't bring themselves to vote Clinton. Look at the 3rd party votes - how many of them would Sanders have scooped up?

Clinton was unelectable, even after the DNC diverted funds to support her campaign that were supposed to be shared with the state campaigns, reserving 99.5% to Hillary. And let's not forget the scam to get around FEC maximum donor contributions.

Certainly hypocritical for a candidate who said they would fight for campaign financing reform and undo Citizen's United.

And we have yet to see any proof that Russia interfered. However, given that Clinton herself admitted that she tried to interfere with Putin's election, stop being so damn hypocritical. The US has interfered in elections in many countries, including it's allies. Why not look at how the CIA undermined ally Japan's election as just one of over 50 examples since ww2. Or go back further and look at the origins of the term "banana republic".

It's stuff like this that has nobody believing anything the government says without ironclad proof. All we've heard is people citing other people's opinions. Opinions are like assholes - everybody has one, and they tend to be full of shit on a regular basis.

A former British ambassador to Uzbekistan has some news on that too
"WikiLeaks figure says ‘disgusted’ Democrat leaked Clinton campaign emails" ( December 14, 2016)
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
"“The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”" (15 December 2016)
"EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
All that fits in well with the "Julian Assange: 'A lot more material' coming on US elections" July 27, 2016
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07...
'"Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces."

The US is just seeing another domestic political Pentagon Papers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...