Slashdot Mirror


Cooling Hardware With Microfans

Jeriten writes "NewsScientist puplished this story about how your chips could be cooled down without that huge and noisy fan. Answer is multiple fans sized smaller than head of a pin and growed directly to a surface of a chips." Now if they could just make hard drives silent, we finally could hear ourselves think in a room with 3-4 computers. I tell ya, the noise generated by a few PCs doesn't seem like much until you turn off the tunes.

197 comments

  1. Big fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Big fans are ok. If they are of high quality they can be almost noiseless, I replaced all of the small fans in my case with some larger ones and the machine is running a lot cooler and quiter now. It's those small fans with high-pitched noises that are the worst!

    1. Re:Big fans by atrowe · · Score: 2
      http://www.pcpowerandcooling.com/

      This site specializes in almost silent power supplies and processor fans. I've got several in my various systems, and I can personally vouch that they're all that they claim and more.

      Disclaimer: I don't work for these people.

      --

      -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

  2. OK, by morie · · Score: 1

    So now my silent box and I are stuck next to a noisy highway. Now what? Silent cars?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    1. Re:OK, by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 3

      To be blunt, yes. Silencing of cars, trucks, buses would go a long way to increasing general mental health in the cities. I recall reading about a muffler for diesel trucks that used a computer to analyse the noise coming down the exhaust and creating an interference pattern to muffle the sound. Whenever I go to the country it's not the silence that I notice, but the goddamn noise when I finally force myself to return to civilisation. We are doomed.

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:OK, by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Funny, whenever I go out to the country, it's the silence that drives me nuts. I've grown accustomed to the hum and whizz of PC's and barely notice the noise anymore. I know it's there, but it doesn't disturb me. The noise is actually something of a status indicator. When I hear the fan speed up ever so slightly, I know Apache is taking a beating.

      I can just sit in a server room for hours sipping Jolt and tweaking the shitty vbscript pages and ActiveX modules the IT guys throw at me all day long. I don't get headaches, my ears are perfectly fine and I can still tell the difference between a CD burned from mp3 vs the real thing.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    3. Re:OK, by QuantumG · · Score: 2

      actually I've always been afraid of "the country". A number of times I've gone out to a rural area and almost gone insane during the day. It's just so quiet! I find it hard to maintain a single line of thought in my head without background noise. During the night it's a different story. Trying to sleep in a rural town is totally dependant on the whether anyone has mowed the lawn that day. If they have, you lie in your bed totally incapable of falling asleep. You have no problem falling which is how I feel in complete silence. If the lawn hasn't been mowed that day you have the standard background noise of traffic replaced with crickets and other green what-have-you's. I dont know how people can stand it. Give me the sweet background noise of traffic and an occasional tram. There is only two other background noises that I can stand. A fan in summer or a thunder storm. But even a thunder storm in the country is ruined by the constant croaking of frogs.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:OK, by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      I dimly recall hearing about anti-sound. IIRC, it could more easily be achieved by hollow tubes reflecting part of the signal and retransmitting it at -1, but that would require knowledge of the frequency you want to suppress etc...

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    5. Re:OK, by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly every since I moved to North America I am surprised how loud Trucks and Buses ARE here.

      I mean looking back to where I come from, Mercedes-Benz was testdriving a new bus that was running on an alternate Fuel Source (don't ask, I don't know, maybe Hydrogene?) and people complained it was too loud, but compared to an average Bus here in Toronto this bus was whispering.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    6. Re:OK, by cylab · · Score: 1

      so it is and i think it is in the queue.

      a week ago i saw a (german) telecast (nano on 3sat) about adaptronic. the essence of this technology is to create materials that react to deformation in an intelligent way. one application mentioned was to counteract vibration which is the cause for most of the noise produced by vehicles.

      one idea is to use piezo-electric wires in composite materials which act as sensors . the produced signals hold information about the deformation. after an analysis, apropriate electric current is put back through the wires and cause a deformation, which counterbalances the first one.

    7. Re:OK, by tzanger · · Score: 1

      actually I've always been afraid of "the country". A number of times I've gone out to a rural area and almost gone insane during the day. It's just so quiet! I find it hard to maintain a single line of thought in my head without background noise. During the night it's a different story. Trying to sleep in a rural town is totally dependant on the whether anyone has mowed the lawn that day. If they have, you lie in your bed totally incapable of falling asleep. You have no problem falling which is how I feel in complete silence. If the lawn hasn't been mowed that day you have the standard background noise of traffic replaced with crickets and other green what-have-you's. I dont know how people can stand it. Give me the sweet background noise of traffic and an occasional tram. There is only two other background noises that I can stand. A fan in summer or a thunder storm. But even a thunder storm in the country is ruined by the constant croaking of frogs.

      Odd, I find the opposite... Absolute silence is wonderful sometimes, and summer nights a hundred or so miles from any kind of city are incredible... The crickets and frogs, a crackling fire perhaps... and the sky! You don't see even 1/10 as many stars in the city because of all the light pollution.

      My ideal place to live would be in the middle of nowhere with a fiber connection. Hell I'll pipe in city noise if I ever feel I need it. :-)

    8. Re:OK, by iso · · Score: 2

      i camped out in the middle of the desert in Utah once. i headed back to the car from the campground to bring back a few jugs of water and while walking through a small valley i experienced complete silence for the very first time. it was an interesting sensation, but i'd have to agree with you that it was somewhat disturbing.

      i also noticed a slight ringing in my ears that was later confirmed to be the beginnings of Tinnitis. i now wear earplugs when i DJ. ;)

      anyhow i now live in downtown Toronto a few blocks from a hospital, and about half a block from an ... intersting ... area of the core. i listen to the sounds of traffic, ambulances and police sirens as i dose off, and i like it. ;)

      - j

    9. Re:OK, by QuantumG · · Score: 2

      Yes.. I absolutely love the sky at night. Stars totally own. I can stare at the sky for hours.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:OK, by ideut · · Score: 1

      Is there any point at all to your sig?

      --

      --

    11. Re:OK, by dietcrack · · Score: 1

      One problem with silent cars though-- you can't hear 'em coming. You don't realize how much people rely on their sense of hearing to tell them when a car is approaching until you almost get run over by a car that doesn't emit the familiar internal-combustion noise.

      I'd wager as soon as EV's get mainstream, they'll be required to have artificial noisemakers, to keep blind people from getting mowed down, so I wouldn't be holding my breath waiting for our cities to get much quieter.

      <rant>Besides, you know as soon as the cars get quieter, assholes will just add more subwoofers to their damned lowered Civics to counteract the quieter traffic. God forbid that the rest of the city not get to share in the pleasure of their music. </rant>

  3. What about by bluelip · · Score: 2

    replacement? What happens when these fans go bad. I understand that there are probably many of them and a single failure won't hurt, But will I have to throw my chip away after 25% of them die?

    --

    Yep, I never spell check.
    More incorrect spellings can be found he
    1. Re:What about by Sc00ter · · Score: 1

      Also, what are you suppose to do about dust? Seems to me that two dust particles would take out one of these fans so fast.
      --

    2. Re:What about by Bojay+Iverson · · Score: 1

      By the time 25% of the fans die, your chips will probably be outdated and ripe for replacement anyway.

      --
      Psychos do not explode when the sunlight hits them, I don't care how fucked up they are.
    3. Re:What about by BMazurek · · Score: 1
      Or, before even replacing them there is always the squeaky/humming/buzzing fan problem. Now, you'll have 8-10 squeaky/humming/buzzing fans, each sounding different.

      I can sense my brain exploding already.

    4. Re:What about by Lizard_King · · Score: 1

      good point. I also wonder how resilient these microscopic fans could be. A computer has to be expected to withstand a few jolts/kicks/bumps and still function normally. A new technology such as this may bring about dramatic case redesign (yeah modders!)

      --
      "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    5. Re:What about by Geeky+Frignit · · Score: 1

      Oh, this is an easy one. Just go pick up a tube of microfan nanotech assemblers and sprinkle them on your CPU. These little buggers go to work and fix any of the broken fans that they find, and then turn into dust which is then cleaned up by the nano-vacuumcleaners that are automatically generated by your computer every twelve hours.
      Duh!!!

      --
      Tired of sitting at that karma cap? Start a flame war today! See just how low you can go!
    6. Re:What about by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a pretty easy replacement. All you do is you get an aftermarket fan to plop on your CPU like you do now, and everything will be beautiful again.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    7. Re:What about by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      That sounds well and good, but for that to be effective you need a smooth conductive surface to get maximum heat-sink / chip energy transfer. I doubt the tops of a hundred broken microfans qualify.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  4. Pedantry by Metal+Machine+Music · · Score: 1

    > Jeriten writes "NewsScientist Ah yes. I remember the News Scientist. Is that the dude who reads the news in a white coat? > puplished this story Puplished? Oh so it's one of those nasty scientists that does tests on dogs. Nasty man. > about how your chips could be cooled down Personally I find the best way to cool chips is to leave them out of the oven for a while after you've fried them. > Answer is multiple fans Is this a definite article? [poor grammatical joke] > sized smaller than head of a pin and growed Like Topsy? She just growed and growed and growed. > directly to a surface of a chips. A chips? [In silly 60s detective film voice]: "Excuse me Mr. Chips we have a situation here."

    1. Re:Pedantry by Metal+Machine+Music · · Score: 1

      [Formatting fixed: sorry. (Why is HTML the default??]

      > Jeriten writes "NewsScientist

      Ah yes. I remember the News Scientist. Is that the dude who reads the news in a white coat?

      > puplished this story

      Puplished? Oh so it's one of those nasty scientists that does tests on dogs. Nasty man.

      > about how your chips could be cooled down

      Personally I find the best way to cool chips is to leave them out of the oven for a while after you've fried them.

      > Answer is multiple fans

      Is this a definite article? [poor grammatical joke]

      > sized smaller than head of a pin and growed

      Like Topsy? She just growed and growed and growed.

      > directly to a surface of a chips.

      A chips?

      [In silly 60s detective film voice]: "Excuse me Mr. Chips we have a situation here."

    2. Re:Pedantry by Tower · · Score: 1

      >Why is HTML the default??

      You can reset that default in your user prefs.

      It is too bad that most of the slashdot readership caint ferm gud sentanses if there live dependsed onit. As usualy, the greater the size of the community, the lower the average IQ level. Oh, well [/useless bitching]

      Mr. Chips rocked.
      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    3. Re:Pedantry by init6 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the net isn't limited to the USA or Great Britain. Believe it or not, for some /. readers, English isn't their first language. *SHOCK*GASP*

      :)

    4. Re:Pedantry by Tower · · Score: 2

      Yes, I am aware of that (they speak English in Canada, too 8^D), but I would think that one would be courteous enough to try and make their story submissions semi-readable. Comments are one thing, story submissions are another (my view). Then there's always the lame cop-out: "Well, I wouldn't post on a [spanish/french/polish/korean] board without a good grasp of the language!"...

      Maybe people are just too busy trying to submit things quickly to check them over... and maybe I'm just too bothered by simple mistakes 8^)
      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    5. Re:Pedantry by aidoneus · · Score: 1

      Yes, but is it expecting too much of the editor of Slashdot, CmdrTaco, to do some editing of the submissions so they are at least readable? Last time I check, English is the language taught in Michigan, so it's not asking too much of him to actually change "puplished" to published.

  5. Why not collect that heat? by brink · · Score: 3
    While this is an interesting and neat idea, what I want to know is how about a device which reclaims that heat and converts it back into electricity? I'm not sure how that'd be implemented, but it seems an awful waste that we let all that heat energy be expelled when conceivably it could be recycled.

    A related idea would be to make some sort of heat exchanger that'd simultaneously cool the cpu and warm your room. With lots of machines, that could save a lot in heating costs.

    I don't know, just an idea. Anyone know if something like this has ever been done before?

    --
    - Jonathan
    1. Re:Why not collect that heat? by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1

      Ok, we've built the steam engine ... now how the hell do we reduce the noise of the turbines?

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Gobeur · · Score: 1

      Dude, I live in South America and believe me, you wouldn't want your room to be hotter!

    3. Re:Why not collect that heat? by pruneau · · Score: 1

      Sorry to dampen our enthousiams, but the first or second law of thermodynamics prevent this. In substance it says that you cannot do it, because you will create heat in the process anyway.

      Or is that a new kind of thermodynamic trolling ?

      --
      [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
    4. Re:Why not collect that heat? by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 1

      hmmm... boiling water with my microprocessor to spin a turbine to make a generator turn... I don't think so...

      "Titanic was 3hr and 17min long. They could have lost 3hr and 17min from that."

      --

      IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
      And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    5. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2

      A related idea would be to make some sort of heat exchanger that'd simultaneously cool the cpu and warm your room. With lots of machines, that could save a lot in heating costs.

      We already have such a "heat exchanger" -- it's the heatsink and fan already on your CPU. And yes, it does put out quite a bit of heat. The 7 computers in my bedroom keep it pretty toasty, way warmer than the rest of the house. The power source and hard drive contribute quite a bit to the amount of heat that comes out, but I think a significant amount of heat comes from the 9 CPUs.


      Enigma

      --

      Enigma

    6. Re:Why not collect that heat? by morpheux · · Score: 1

      Easy take two piees of different metal join together at one end, place end in a warn plece t'other in a cool place and a potential will be genreated. It's called a thermocouple. http://www.morpheux.org

    7. Re:Why not collect that heat? by bmongar · · Score: 4

      The laws of thermodynamics do not prevent the useful collection of waste heat. What they prevent is achieving 100% efficiency by doing so because your collection and transformation system will loose some heat, not create necessarily create heat

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    8. Re:Why not collect that heat? by stilwebm · · Score: 1

      My computers have heat exchangers that simultaneously cool the cpu and warm the room. They are called heat sinks, with fans helping distribute the warm air throughout the room. A 300W system (assuming it's using all 300W) is just over 1000BTUs... In fact, Sun lists the BTUs for just about all their systems so users can anticipate external cooling needs in their datacenter/noc.

    9. Re:Why not collect that heat? by pm5k · · Score: 1

      dude, i forget which law (im bout 2 years removed from my physics class) but i do recall a law that stated energy cannot be created or destroyed (law of conservation of energy)

      --
      What you say!? ---Captain
    10. Re:Why not collect that heat? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      It's been done, but usually it's been in bizarre experiments that wind up on quickie pages of large weblogs; a few months ago there was a story of a guy who used the heat from his CPU to distill alcohol. Although, I think you may be on to something for large tech buildings here. Have large fans pipe air over all the CPUs in the server farm and use the heated air in the rest of the building. But a home user with a PC or two wouldn't be able to heat a very large space.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    11. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Kishar · · Score: 2

      The three laws of Thermodynamics, made easy:
      1) You can't get anything done without working for it.
      2) The most you can accomplish by working is to break even.
      3) You can only break even at absolute zero.

      -Mith

      PS
      (From the original story) "growed"? Is that a word?
      --

    12. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Weh · · Score: 1

      Huh ?

      Thermodynamics (first law) says that energy is neither created nor destroyed. So how can the universe 'lose' energy ?

      According to the second law of Thermodynamics heat will flow only in one direction when there is no external work done on it (from hot to cold obviously). Applied to the universe this means that the universe tends to 'even out' temperature differences until an equilibrium is reached.

      The Carnot corollaries to the second law state that the amount of work obtained from a system between 2 thermal reservoirs is bound by a maxiumum efficiency. This efficiency is directly related to the temprature difference

      All in all it means that if you have a certain amount of heat at a high (absolute) temperature the work that can be obtained from it is much higher than work obtained from the same amount of heat at lower temprature. After heat (witout losing it's energy) reaches a certain temprature, it becomes virtually useless because everything in it's surroundings is the same temprature

      The heat from fans is at a relatively (to the surroundings) low temprature (low quality heat) and so the potential for work being done is very small due to the low theoretical maxiumum Carnot efficiency.

    13. Re:Why not collect that heat? by gle · · Score: 1

      s/energy/entropy/


      --
      Ni!
    14. Re:Why not collect that heat? by bungalow · · Score: 1

      Borealis claims to have found this, but very little data is available except a press release.

      It's an excitiong promise, but it appears to be quite gaseous.

    15. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Spectre · · Score: 1

      A heat exchanger that would simultaneously cool the CPU and warm your room? We use those now. They're called "heat sinks" and are optionally fitted with a "fan" as well :)

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    16. Re:Why not collect that heat? by yesthatguy · · Score: 1

      The law of conservation of energy does say that energy can neither be created or destroyed. However, the universe is losing energy at a slow rate, and entropy (disorder/randomness/chaos/etc.) is increasing. This, however, is not enough to significantly affect thermodynamic studies done even on what we perceive to be a large scale.
      ---------------

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    17. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Life+Blood · · Score: 1

      You forgot the infamous zeroth Law of Thermodynamics:

      0) Temperature works thermodynamically.

      --

      So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

    18. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      The universe isn't loseing energy. Where did you hear that? Maybe energy is turning into matter, or maybe the energy is getting more evenly distributed, but it's not being "lost".

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    19. Re:Why not collect that heat? by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      Fans DO cool the cpu and warm your room. Given that computers run in summer in for several months each year, I don't think that's a good thing.


      ---

    20. Re:Why not collect that heat? by myosin · · Score: 1

      A related idea would be to make some sort of heat exchanger that'd simultaneously cool the cpu and warm your room. With lots of machines, that could save a lot in heating costs.

      Thats what normally happens. Heat produced by the cpu is transfered to the room. Simultaneously cooling the cpu and warming your room!!!

      -----
      "Almost isn't good enough - but it's almost good enough."

      --

      -----
      "Almost isn't good enough - but it's almost good enough."
      -Me
    21. Re:Why not collect that heat? by wurp · · Score: 1

      First I was going to tell you how wrong you were, now I think that maybe you're just being unclear.

      Certainly the laws of thermodynamics don't prevent the useful collection of waste heat. The universe doesn't separate heat into "waste heat" and "other heat", and (for example) the engine in your car certainly converts heat differences (the difference in temperature between the inside of the engine and the outside) into useful energy.

      However, in no case does the transformation of heat differential into useful energy cause heat to go away, which is how I interpreted your "loose (sic) some heat" statement. The heat will be lost to the cooler environment; that's the only way to convert it to useful energy. But the heat just moves from one part of the system to another. And every transformation system must create heat, that's the second law of thermodynamics.

      It looks to me as if you know what you're talking about, but it confused me and could be teaching falsehoods to folks.

      Bobby

  6. How Valuable by gowen · · Score: 1

    Silent hardware is nice, but there can't be too many people willing to pay a large premium for it (as oppposed to, say, flat screens.) Until the price is comparable to the noisy varieties, this is going to be a non-event.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  7. Not only Maxtors by _570RM_ · · Score: 1

    I have a Fujitsu 20GB and i never hear it. Its getting to the point where its disturbing during a long fsck :)

    1. Re:Not only Maxtors by Guido+del+Confuso · · Score: 1

      Love that Joker!

      Oh, wait, that was Smilex...

  8. I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1
    My computer has 12 fans:

    two on the power supply,

    two 80mm fans venting the hard drives,

    the CPU fan, the fan on the GeForce 2 GTS,

    the 80mm fan on the front, the 3-fan 5.25" bay vent, and

    two Antec Cyclone slotfans (one below my sound card, one below my video card).
    I also have two 3.7" fans that are just waiting to be put in (one from an old 386, one from an ancient Bernoulli drive). If I did happen to find places for those two, then my fan total would go up to 14.
    No, I'm not overclocking this system; I hate overclocking. I just hate heat and dust buildup inside the case.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    1. Re:I like my loud computer. by Sc00ter · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you, but when I open my case to upgrade my harddrive/videocard/whatever I find that most of the dust is either being drawn in by the fans, or collected on the fans.

      I think a real solution to that would be some kind of filter. I have one cast that has a filter over the fan in the front of the case and that works very well, I think that would be better then more fans.
      --

    2. Re:I like my loud computer. by Archanagor · · Score: 1

      So ... you're the reason for the rolling blackouts in CA? <grin>

      ---

    3. Re:I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1
      My 3-fan bay vent has a filter on it. I could probably go to the local hardware store (screw Home Depot!) and get some filtering to squeeze in front of the 80mm fan in the front. However, my room is kinda dusty (I live in it, right?), and I had to clean out the filter of the 3-fan vent about two weeks ago. As for the other fans, I attack them with an air duster.

      Still, the computer itself has a commanding stance: it's a full tower standing on my desk, and you always know when it's on (whirrrrrrrr!!!!). As you can probably tell by now, I hated the G4 cube; it was too damn quiet (of course, I'm leaving out its other downfalls).

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    4. Re:I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1
      So ... you're the reason for the rolling blackouts in CA?

      Most likely not, I live in Massachusetts, 20 miles west of Boston (as the train rolls, not as the crow flies).

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    5. Re:I like my loud computer. by palutke · · Score: 1

      The solution for your dust problem is to get some sort of filter for your room, to get rid of the dust before it's sucked into your PC. A HEPA filter may be overkill, but it'll sure get rid of the dust.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    6. Re:I like my loud computer. by quincyq · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, near Worcester ? :)

    7. Re:I like my loud computer. by _J_ · · Score: 1

      according to this Slashdot Poll you are above average. I wonder if the spread has changed any since. I'm at seven myself.

      J:)

    8. Re:I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

      nah, actually right in between Boston and Worcester.

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    9. Re:I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

      Nothing's wrong. I'm just a fan of fans.

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    10. Re:I like my loud computer. by Kishar · · Score: 1

      Screw Home Depot?
      They use Linux!
      --

    11. Re:I like my loud computer. by Niji · · Score: 1

      22 fans myself actually

      ;-)

    12. Re:I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

      no, no, I hate Home Depot because they're the Wal-Mart of hardware stores. I'd rather support the locally operated place where my father gets all his lumber (in his opinion, the lumber at Home Depot sucks, Linux cash registers be damned).

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    13. Re:I like my loud computer. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

      Any sheet metal modifications to mount extra ones? I've been thinking of doing that to get the 3.7" fans on there. I should probably check out Hard|OCP for some inspiration.

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    14. Re:I like my loud computer. by Niji · · Score: 1

      If ya really wanna see some fun stuff, check this out! http://www.virtualhideout.net/cool_case/ Some cool stuff in here...

  9. There are two fanless computers already by plsuh · · Score: 2

    Why bother with fans at all? There are two fully-functional desktop personal computers out there today that you can go out and plunk down cash, credit card, or check with two forms of ID and take home right away. You can install Linux or *BSD on them, or use the vendor's pre-installed OS. In two months, the vendor is going to release a new, Unix-based BSD 4.4-compatible operating system that will be pre-installed on all of the machines come the summer.

    What am I talking about? The iMac and the Cube, both by Apple. Both are completely convection cooled, and the only sound you hear is the clicking of the hard drive (and the sound of the other poor bozos getting fragged in Q3A ;-) Check it out at Apple's iMac page and Apple's Cube page.

    OK, so I work for Apple, but c'mon folks, do the design right and you don't need a fan!


    --Paul

    1. Re:There are two fanless computers already by Sc00ter · · Score: 1
      The new iMacs have fans, and they sell them for the older ones that do not.

      Why? because they overheat and shut off. There was also reported problems with the cubes doing this.
      --

    2. Re:There are two fanless computers already by banky · · Score: 2

      Apple's promotional literature for the newest releases (Rosemary, Thyme, and Sage?) still loudly and proudly proclaims no fan, no way. Since the case design is unchanged from the original Bondi Blue models, where did they put it? I can't seem to find it.

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    3. Re:There are two fanless computers already by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      The new iMacs do not have fans.

    4. Re:There are two fanless computers already by QuantumG · · Score: 2

      Do they also proudly proclaim style > substance? I watched a movie today and, with true product placement style, the lead character buys an Apple iBook. She then goes into a bar and orders a Pepsi. Ladies and gentlement of the jury, I rest my case.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:There are two fanless computers already by dhovis · · Score: 2

      Au contraire. Apple did change the case design. They removed a lot of metal from inside the original Bondi blue (and first generation fruit-flavored) iMacs. The case is more round and bulbous than the original iMac, it was just subtle enough that nobody would notice unless you sat two next to each other. This change came about with the release of the first DV iMacs (DVD-ROM and Firewire). Quick rule of thumb: if an iMac has a slot loading CD or DVD drive, it has no fan.
      --

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    6. Re:There are two fanless computers already by chrischow · · Score: 1

      sure now? i got one of the latest imac models (though a few months old by now) and i can't hear any fan in it guy. the older imac does have a fan

    7. Re:There are two fanless computers already by chrischow · · Score: 1

      apple hardware has style *and* substance

    8. Re:There are two fanless computers already by banky · · Score: 2

      I wasn't talking about style. a poster said that they had fans. Based on my personal experience, I disagreed. I was hoping for pointers to information that showed that their literature was *technically inaccurate*.

      But iMac bashing always gets good karma around here.

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    9. Re:There are two fanless computers already by Delphis · · Score: 1

      you buy an Apple because you want style and you dont know shit about substance, if you dont then bully for you but you're about the only one.

      Yep, it's true.. Seems like Mac users (yes, all 10 of them) just love to buy into whatever Apple's marketing can generate. They buy into it so much it becomes religious.

      Hell, they put Linux and Amiga zealots to shame.


      --

      --
      Delphis
    10. Re:There are two fanless computers already by chrischow · · Score: 1

      oh i know all about substance thank you, sorry for having a different opinion than you dude

  10. Problem: Processors are too hot. by Panamon777 · · Score: 2

    Solution: Find ways to cool them.

    While I understand that electronics will (for the foreseeable future) generate heat, it seems to me that it is just as important to find ways to make them run cooler as it is to find ways to cool them. Apple's latest iMac line (I think) was convection cooled - but the monitor, processor, and hard drive give off enough heat to make the entire machine very warm. It definitely a step towards a quieter computer, but an iMac won't suffice for your average Slashdot reader.

    As for microfans - they're not really even microelectronics. They belong in the region of "mesoscale," which means macroscopic but small. I saw pictures of Apple's latest G4 (which rivals the Pentium in terms of energy consumption) in which Apple had encased the entire processor card in plastic to dampen fan noise.

    Anyway, just some thoughts.

    1. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by Marcus+Aanerud · · Score: 5

      The G4 rivals the Pentium in power consumption? Not really. According to Motorola's fact sheets on the PowerPC 7400, it uses an average of 5 watts of power at 400mhz, 11.5 watts max. The PowerPC 7450 (the new version of the G4 used in the 533, 667 and 733mhz models with embedded L2 cache and slightly lower core voltage) uses 14-17 watts of power at 533mhz. The Pentium III, on the other hand, uses anywhere from 30 watts of power to 50 watts for the super-overclocked 1.13ghz recall units. I wasn't able to find any stats on Intel's website or in their datasheets (too much marketing), so that number might not be completely accurate, but I am sure it's much higher than the PowerPC 75xx processor line.

      Apple encased the whole G4 processor card in plastic to dampen fan noise? Not really. There IS no processor fan on the new G4 models. There's a huge honkin' heat sink on it (which sits next to the power supply and an external vent when the door's closed), but there is no direct cooling on the processor. So, no, I don't think you've seen a picture of the latest G4. If you had, you wouldn't've claimed they encased the processor in plastic. Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of cooling? Heat can't escape through plastic as easily as it can through air. :)

      The hard drive in the latest iMacs don't make that much heat, actually. Apple uses three kinds of hard drives in their latest lines: Maxtor, Seagate, and Quantum. They all run rather cool, with the Quantum being the hottest of them all (this is all subjective, and I haven't scientifically measured this stuff). The Seagate drives are definitely the quietest, though. :) The processor is one component that stays really cool. The heat sink for the processor happens to be the entire metal shield between the logic board and the Analog/Video/Power board. This shield has lots of holes in it that air goes through. It's quite an interesting and practical design. The monitor makes most of the heat, but since the tube is several inches away from the bottom of the iMac, there's plenty of room for heat to move up away from the components, sucking lots of cool air over the expensive stuff (logic board, hard drive, etc...) on the bottom of the computer. I admit it's not the coolest design, but considering what it is, it works really well.

      The micro fans might be nice on paper, but how long do readers think it'll take for MAJOR chip vendors to implement them? The heatsink/fan combo has been with us for as long as I can remember, and considering how cheap and easy it is, I don't see it changing that much very soon. We need cooler processors, not better fans/heatsinks.

      Path of least resistance, I guess.

      Here's a Pentium III Datasheet. If anyone can find the wattage for the P3 in this marketing mess, I'd appreciate knowing it: http://www.intel.com/design/pentiumiii/datashts/24 526407.pdf

      Here's a PowerPC 7400 Datasheet: http://e-www.motorola.com/brdata/PDFDB/MICROPROCES SORS/32_BIT/POWERPC/MPC7XX/MPC7400FACT.pdf

      And here's a PowerPC 7450 datasheet: http://e-www.motorola.com/collateral/MPC7450FSR0.p df

    2. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by Howie · · Score: 1

      Page 50 (PDF page 50) of http://developer.intel.com/design/pentiumiii/datas hts/24445208.pdf has Thermal Specs.

      Page 28 has the current requirements for Vcc/Icc. Up to 23A for the core at 1.13Ghz!!

      At 2V Vcc, that's 46W, n'est pas?

      Does anyone know of a small, sensible desktop platform based around the SA1110? I'd like an NCD/Corel Netwinder sixed system with one of these. Low power, quiet, and quite a lot of interesting gadgetry. Sort of an X terminal on steroids, with sound, USB, etc. It looks like you should be able to build them for about $400 or so (no disk).

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    3. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by iso · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know of a small, sensible desktop platform based around the SA1110?

      well if you're going to go non-x86, i'd consider a MIPS processor over an SA1110. there are lots of embedded computers (including Internet Applicances) that are being designed with MIPS processors. they're available from lots of different vendors too. Linux is generally the operating system of choice on these things, partially due to the strong commitment to the MIPS Linux port by SGI.

      - j

    4. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by itarget · · Score: 1

      That was quite a lengthy post... It also bears mentioning that low power consumption and low heat generation tend to go hand in hand.
      If you're drawing less power, you have less energy overall that can be turned into heat. Efficiency of the use of that energy also helps though. :)

      --

      "Where shall the word be found, where will the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence." -T.S. Eliot
    5. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by willy_me · · Score: 1
      There IS no processor fan on the new G4 models. There's a huge honkin' heat sink on it (which sits next to the power supply and an external vent when the door's closed), but there is no direct cooling on the processor. So, no, I don't think you've seen a picture of the latest G4. If you had, you wouldn't've claimed they encased the processor in plastic.

      It looks like the 7450 does get a CPU fan. Look at the picture near the bottom of the following link:

      http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/G4ZONE/G4_533mhz_revi ew /

      While you can't see the fan, you can see the power cable leading into the plastic enclosed heat sink. One can only assume this leads to a CPU fan.

      Willy

    6. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by willy_me · · Score: 1
      Under closer inspection, it appears that the plastic cover is used to channel air from the outside of the case directly over the heat sink. If you look at the picture above the one previously mentioned, you see that there is an air vent in the back just behind the heat sink. While it's impossible to tell for sure, it appears that the plastic casing channels air from this vent. This would also explain the need for that plastic casing.

      Willy

    7. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by Peter+McC · · Score: 1

      Check page 47 of that Pentium III datasheet. Table 24 has a column "Processor Thermal Design Power (W)" which they say is the maximum amount of power the thermal solution is required to dissipate - sounds like what we're looking for.

      A 500MHz PIII only dissipates a maximum of 13.2 Watts, apparently - that's way lower than I'd have thought. This goes up to about 30W for the 1GHz, which is fairly reasonable since I remember hearing that the PII 400MHz (which was the fastest Intel could make for a long time) drew about 24W. As a comparison point with the G4, the PIII dissipates a maximum of 14W at 533MHz - that's the same as the _average_ for the G4.

      Either Intel's a lot better than I thought, or we're comparing apples and oranges (no pun intended) here.

      Peter.

      --
      You know what I hate? Wait, what do you like? I hate that!
    8. Re:Problem: Processors are too hot. by NovaX · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to remember that Intel continously shrinks the die size on their chips. The 400mhz may have been an .25nm+, while the new 1Ghz are at .18 (or .13?). That shrink reduces power consumption and therefore heat disipation considerably. It also allows for higher clock rates, which is a significant reason why Intel was able to extend the P6 architecture so far.

      I'd bet that if the G4 and Pentium III were at the same die size, the G4 would disipate less heat per clock. That's simply because the Motorola chips were touted for their low power/heat requirements and that Intel spends a significant amount of money on research and fabrication. Intel chips are usually at the smallest process available (though they have a conservative look, and don't switch right away). If you look at server chips (and other than AMD, most CPUs), the majority are fabbed at larger sizes then Intel's.

      This would just be my guess at things, though.


      -----------------------------------------

      --

      "Open Source?" - Press any key to continue
  11. For those interested in Science by ishrat · · Score: 1
    Scientists from the Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory announced that its new particle accelerator, the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, had created the highest density of matter ever made in an experiment. The record for creating the densest matter in an experiment, previously set by CERN last year, has been broken just a couple of times in the last 15 years.

    The link.

    --

    There's always sufficient, but not always at the right place nor for the right folks.

  12. New Scientist is NOT a reliable source by Binx+Bolling · · Score: 1

    It is amusing to see slashdot editors consistenly take New Scientist seriously. It is a hair above the Weekly World News in the journalistic food chain. I was "interviewed" by one of their "reporters" once. That only confirmed what most scientists/engineers already know about its penchant for enhancing mundane science with the most preposterous speculation.

    1. Re:New Scientist is NOT a reliable source by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      no, proactive and paradigm are words dumb people use to sound smart.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  13. Great by Jakdaw · · Score: 1
    As computers start to do more and more things in our homes (streamed audio replacing radio, video capture replacing your vcr, mp3 collection replacing your cd collection [perhaps] etc) silent computers will be a requirement. This sort of technology is a great step forward towards this.

    As for noisy hard-drives this probably won't be a problem as you'd probably not want data to be stored away from devices that you physically interact with and accessible from several of them. Each home could have a server built in in the loft with fast networking around the home. All data is stored on the server, then lower performance systems could be installed next to your tv/hifi etc.

  14. Good idea by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 3

    This definitely sounds like a good idea.

    /me looks around the room and counts.

    Okay, i have some 6 computers sorrounding me in this real small room. I live in Australia. The Temperature outside is over 40C. (110F). Its hot.

    Luckily, we have the A/C on, so its real cool in here. But the computers make FAR too much noise with all the darn fans.

    I'm not even going to begin counting how many fans my main workstation (Dual PIII-500 512mb ram) has. Well. Okay. Cpu fans, 2. Case fans (extra added by me), power supply fans, and even fans on my CD-R.

    And thats not my only Dual CPU box ...

    Computers definitely have a problem with heat, and shoving ever more fans into cases is not the solution. New tech such as this, is.

    When the power goes out, its almost surprising at the silence around you ... only then you realise just how noisy the room was with all the fans.

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  15. one meg rpm? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    One interesting piont at the end of the article:
    Mark Spearing, currently testing microturbines at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, calls the fan "ingenious", but says the speeds achieved are "rather slow".

    "We're striving for in excess of one million rpm in our motor," he says.

    Spearing has other concerns too. "I am not a big fan of frictional or sliding contacts in micro electro-mechanical devices," he says. "Friction and wear tend to be potential show-stoppers at these scales."

    I can see the need for 1 meg rpm, because I don't know how much circulation you are going to get for cooling otherwise. Cooling does require a certain amount of air volume, or something, to do the job.
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:one meg rpm? by mrfiddlehead · · Score: 1
      Two words: surface area

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:one meg rpm? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      Two words: surface area

      well the surface area of your standard industrial size heat sinks is many times the surface are of your standard cpu, for example.

      The impression I got was that these would be surface mounted on the cpu itself. (I could be drastically wrong, of course)

      Applying these to the heat sink would not be so bad, but I am not sure of the cost benefit angle.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    3. Re:one meg rpm? by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      Two words: surface area

      Increasing the surface area allows you to move air slower and still get adequate cooling. That's all it does.

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  16. OC possibilities....*grins* by Daemosthenes · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine it know...

    Cries of "I have 12 fans on my computer" from all the OC sites will rapidly be replaced by "I have 300,000 fans on my computer!" However, things like Sub-zero alcohol cooled PC's will never change.


    47.5% Slashdot Pure(52.5% Corrupt)

  17. fan failure? by trazom28 · · Score: 1

    So.. what do you do when the fan fails and needs replacing... get out your microscope and tweezers or what? Nothing lasts forever.

    --
    {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
  18. Good Feng Shui by twisty · · Score: 2
    My wife and I collaborate on many projects... I produce a lot of art and programs on computer, she had never touched a computer until five years ago, but we're both artists. Anywho, we often produce some party events for the local science fiction community, and have learned what an important contribution Feng Shui adds to an environment's creature comforts.

    I've lately heard a lot of good things about how quiet MacIntoshes are. Since I've been making this the year of my Microsoft purge, I have become self-sufficient in GNU/Linux with the help of the local users group. But lately I've become aware just how much noise fills a room with a single tower... or even with no tower and only a 3com Superstack 24port hub, running its fan. Such a harmful shar can be maddening when compounded.

    There has got to be a more efficient way to "recycle" wasted energy in a system... particularly in notepads. If a modern CPU generates 25watts of energy into raw heat, and a fan is required to cool it, reducing battery life, there's got to be a way to use that more efficiently. If the CPU heat can not only run its own fans, but maybe also backlight a display or something else useful, then the waste of heat and noise are replaced with greater efficiency.

    1. Re:Good Feng Shui by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      how about explaining what feng shui is to those of us who haven't been smoking pot since we were old enough to hold a joint in our mouths.

      or perhaps what a harmful shar is.

  19. Apple anyone? by QuantumG · · Score: 3

    Common, bitchin' about fans in computers is so 1984. Just get too carried away with this whole fanless silence thing and you end up with a computer that looks like a water cooler.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Apple anyone? by twitter · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure, but I think the Cube uses a power supply fan, like my 486.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    2. Re:Apple anyone? by tao · · Score: 1

      Nope, it doesn't. The tower-model of the PowerMac G4 does have a fan for the power-supply (but no other fans, something that makes me thankful; I love my G4...), but the Cube doesn't have any fans. To avoid overheating, the power-supply is external, much similar to other nice computers, such as the Commodore 64/128, Amiga 500/600/1200 etc.

    3. Re:Apple anyone? by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's got an external powersupply. that mofo gets HOT tho, I've heard reports of things put over the vent on top catching fire (but the quiet part is nice!)

      --
      The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  20. It's wAIfer thin mOnsieur :) by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    Ugg... why are you script kiddies such jerks. SHUT UP! Don't post unless you have something to say that's at least an amusing contribution to what is laughably referred to as a "discussion thread". Also, "...and growed directly to a surface of a chips." is just... too much. Someone edit! Oh, and these fans are an interesting gadget. The media has picked up this story last night (sorry Slashdot) and showed the fans are made from the same silicon material as the chips themselves, just cut into fan shapes and powered to work (funny, never saw them actually demonstrated). This strikes me as another sign of the growing miniature research and development world (an interesting subject to discuss in ... oh say ... a thread?). IBM being well known for all their press releases about atom sized working parts, etc. But when will all these miniature miracles be used for the public good? ... HAHAHAHA! I know, it's just so funny to say such things. Cheers monkeys... ;p

  21. Re:more fans - more power - more fans - more power by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    No way. Ever put your hands on the GeForce while it's running? OUCH, that's hot! There's a reason why they put heatsinks on the DDR ram.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  22. progress ? by mirko · · Score: 2

    We just discussed about power shortages and you keep your hungry hardware ?
    Come on !
    i just think we should take a deeper look to the low-consumption alternatives around, like this, or this.
    What ? Vapourware. Nope. I own many machines running these processors and my brother just bought a transmeta laptop which he's in love with.
    Don't believe the hype and aim your purchases towards a brighter future.
    Intel's selling radiators, so is Nvidia.
    --

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:progress ? by TheHornedOne · · Score: 1

      Or this.. http://www.chips.ibm.com/products/powerpc/

  23. can they.. by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    Can they build these into t-shirts too?

    Of course this could lead to propagating smells, while cooling off the person wearing the special micro fan shirt...

    E.


    www.randomdrivel.com -- All that is NOT fit to link to

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:can they.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      or perhaps we could encourage french people to turn these t-shirts inside out.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  24. "growed"? by fprintf · · Score: 1

    Call me the English police, but since when is "growed" a word? I would have used "grown" in this context.

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    1. Re:"growed"? by deaddog · · Score: 1

      I'm just surprised that the horrible grammar and spelling came from the person who submitted the article, and not from Taco.
      --

  25. Fan Speed by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    These micro-fans currently run at 100RPM. My current CPU fan is about 3000RPM. Shouldn't these things be faster since they have a smaller radius, not slower? Sounds like somebody came up with a great trick for making them, but that the methodology does not scale well.

    1. Re:Fan Speed by hfukuda · · Score: 1

      Not really. RPM is angular velocity, which dosen't change like linear velocity. Linear velocity changes depending on how far away you are from the center (hence CAV CD-ROM drives read data faster from the edges).

    2. Re:Fan Speed by Weh · · Score: 1

      well, the tip velocity equals the product of the angular velocity and the radius, so to get the same tip velocity on a fan with a smaller radius you need higher angular velocity. So the original poster was right.

      smaller fans tend to be less efficient because (usually) the 'hub' diameter is relatively larger relatively to the fan diameter.

  26. Silent Hard Drives Here? by Dr.+Transparent · · Score: 1

    I've been using a Maxtor 75G 7200RPM Drive for about 6 months now. I swear, you can't hear the drive. I've turned everything else off in the room and still the hum of the fan is the only thing you can hear.

  27. Certain computers have lost their fans already! by irn_bru · · Score: 1

    Now, if you'll excuse the terrible pun, surely the industry should be moving towards leaner, more efficient processors.

    Has anyone ever measured the AMD Athlon's contribution to global warming through both its excessive voltage requirements and heat dissipation.

    I've been waiting for someone to bring out a 5 1/4" Toasted Sandwitch drive module for my overclocked dream machine. I doubt it would even need a heating element...

    Man, I've hardly had the heating on this winter.

  28. overlooked... by tupawk · · Score: 1

    Anyone have an idea about how much noise would be generated by a ton of these fans all going at 1 million revolutions per minute?? It seems to me that it has the potential to be even noiser than what we have now.

    --
    "it could just be the midgets. You've got to be careful with midgets in Spandex." --Jamie Richardson
  29. (OT) - Growed? by rangek · · Score: 1

    Come on... are we all five here? This is just ridiculous.

    1. Re:(OT) - Growed? by BrK · · Score: 2

      It's a well-known fact, anyone that picks on spelling/grammar is a Big Poo Poo Head.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
  30. Re:Reversable logic by QuantumG · · Score: 2

    wow, an AC with something useful to say. Would this be what you're talking about? Don't worry, the market for vogue computing technology will open wide up when we try to squeeze those last ten years out of silicon.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  31. Hearing problems due to computers by barzok · · Score: 1

    Taco brings up an interesting point - computers do get noisy, and it's a dull, droning noise. Standing in our server room one day last week, I got to thinking about the noise level and type of noise being generated. I wonder if long-term exposure to it without protection would lead to partial hearing loss, maybe in particular frequency ranges? Might we see OSHA regs on the amount of noise put out by desktops, and required hearing protection in a room with more than X boxes per square foot?

    1. Re:Hearing problems due to computers by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      No need to worry about hearing problems - it takes a LOT of computers to bring the noise level up to 85 dB(A), which is AFAIK considered the maximum noise level one should work under without hearing protection.
      Another thing is noise-induced stress as a psychological problem. There is an "ecological" quality label in Germany that actually specifies a maximum noise level (IIRC around 45 dB(a)).
      In a job several years ago, I was working on the noise measurements in QA, and boxes with cheap, lousy fans had problems meeting that limit.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  32. Noise Good by BrK · · Score: 3

    Now if they could just make hard drives silent, we finally could hear ourselves think in a room with 3-4 computers

    Fan noise does have an upside, though. In my home office I find that the noise from my SparcUltra10, 2 Regular PC's, Rackmount PC, and 3 laptops drowns out the noise of my wife :)

    If the room were silent, I would probably have to respond to her calls to come down and take out the trash or something.

    --
    -This sig intentionally left blank
    1. Re:Noise Good by shinji1911 · · Score: 1

      I find HD noise, especially extremely loud ones, to be helpful in telling activity. I don't want to have to look for a tiny orange LED to tell how the HD is doing.

    2. Re:Noise Good by AlphaWolf · · Score: 1
      Even better is when you get to the point when you can tell which HDD in the system is being accessed just by the sound.

      Anyone ever notice that the one of the "standard" HDD/computer sound effect used in games, movies, TV shows is the sound of an old Seagate ST-251/ST-225? I had several of those, and I still get a laugh every time I hear that sound when coupled with "advanced" computers.

      But what will the guys at http://www.fast-mhz.com/ do now? If you can't see that you've got 100,000 fans in your box, what's the point? :)

      --
      Ow! My eye! Which one? The one on the floor. ---Action Quake2 exchange, after catching 5 M4 rounds to the head.
  33. What he didn't mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    My computer has 12 fans

    ...becuase I need to compensate for the load that my Windows 2000 box puts on the CPU.

  34. Ack! by dr_db · · Score: 1

    My finger is caught in the fans!

  35. fans are great, but better chipmaking is the way by Calimus · · Score: 1

    Micro fans are pretty cool, they definitly show that over time, everything gets smaller in th IT world. But let's face it, we don't need armies of micro fans cooling our hardware. What we need are better built chips that use less watts and produce less heat. Transmeta's Crusoe processor is a pretty good example. This is the direction we really need to move in. However, it's also nice to know that for the things that will never be able to go low heat, that there is a immerging solution on the way.

    --
    Trying to be different, just like everyone else.
  36. In other news... by Amigori · · Score: 3
    Today in London, researchers have successfully grown a pig that can fly. Dr. Smith and his team of farmers and genetic engineers combined the growth pattern of microfans with the pigs skin and hooves. "We were just trying to create a 'Cool' pig," Dr. Smith noted. "Our team didn't think the fans were powerful enough to lift the pig off the ground."

    University of Colorado researchers state they never had the intention of using these micro fans outside of the computer world. Apparently, they underestimated the creative will of some insane scientists.

    Protestors outside the research facility held up signs saying, "It's the end of the world! Pigs are flying!"

    -------------

    Seriously though, I think they are "cool" and can't wait until I can buy a chip with them on it. Hopefully, they will sell sheets of these fans to the consumer market. Plus, these could have great influency on small computer designs in which the heat could be dissapated more quickly and efficiently.

    Amigori

    ------------
    Duck! No, that's a pig flying!

    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
    1. Re:In other news... by jbuhler · · Score: 1

      The day that large mammals, especially ruminants, learn to fly is the day I'll be investing heavily in extra-strength umbrellas (and possibly helmets).

  37. What is Feng Shui? by twisty · · Score: 2
    To explain: Feng Shui (pronounced "fung shway") are words from Chinese which literally trandslate as "Wind and Water." Primarily, it is used in architecture and decorating to maximize the comfort of how the environment flows.

    It has many applications. On one level, it deals with furnishing, landscapes, and building to increase comfort. On another level, more important to the work my wife and I do, it is about removing offensive stimulii, or balancing the qi/chi/whatever-you-call-energy. This does not mean maximizing efficiency in a machine like manner, because having long straight hallways, or doors evenly opposite each other in halls, can "point" offensive "energy"(noise, flow, stress) at a person.

    I've known architects to redirect long hallways, or split them up with fire doors, just to slow the flow of a place into more pleasing directions. Ironically, this seems to parallel electronics in a metaphorical way, balancing "resistances" where an inducer could do harm. Stressful positions, like having your back to the door or world all the time, can make a person paranoid ("Big brother is watching" or "I could be stabbed in the back!"), and such offensive stimulii are called shars , which I think means "poison dart." Feng Shui prescribes remedies, such as having a desk mirror to see who's behind you.

    In a world where it's easy to go hard-of-hearing amidst computer equipment, Good Feng Shui should be considered in this design, as it is in any other field of design. Microfans could be far more harmonious, or quiet (yin), than conventional cooling methods.

    PS: I've also made little microcontroller "pets" whose LEDs simulate breathing rhythms. It has a cool, soothing energy about it.

    1. Re:What is Feng Shui? by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Stressful positions, like having your back to the door or world all the time, can make a person paranoid ("Big brother is watching" or "I could be stabbed in the back!"), and such offensive stimulii are called shars , which I think means "poison dart." Feng Shui prescribes remedies, such as having a desk mirror to see who's behind you.

      Oh, you mean like inward facing office cubicles and the need for some sort of 'boss detector'?

      I heartily agree!

      --

      --
      Delphis
    2. Re:What is Feng Shui? by GooseKirk · · Score: 1

      PS: I've also made little microcontroller "pets" whose LEDs simulate breathing rhythms. It has a cool, soothing energy about it.

      Hey, this sounds interesting. Do you have pictures and/or schematics on a website?

    3. Re:What is Feng Shui? by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, but I guess I could have just hit google for what you provided. Thanks for reinforcing my laziness.

  38. Sorry, but all moving parts prone to failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    If it needs a fan, then that's a sign of a BAD DESIGN. Look at Crusoe chips to see a much higher performance:heat-generation ratio. For me, this is a big issue. I install radio repeater controllers on mountain tops for various communications companies (radio, TV, cellular relay, business 2-way, etc.) And many of these places are accessible ONLY by helicopter... and only when there's no storms. These little block huts on the mountain top are not heated and temperatures can reach -80F easily. Power is often limited or generated on site (with secondary cells to store excess power to cover other times).

    Fans are out in this environment. Fans gunk up with dust and die. And a trip to fix it costs thousands of dollars. Actually *anything* with moving parts is out. The oil in fan motors and even in hard drive motors can gel up when it gets that cold. So we use solid state flash+static ram drives, and 486/25s that need no fans. Cursoe may finally be the next CPU upgrade because it runs cool without help.

    1. Re:Sorry, but all moving parts prone to failure. by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      You know I find that one of the funniest thigns I've ever heard... first in -80F wheather why are you using a fan on a cpu? You should jsut be using a big heatsink... Heck I 'accidentally' (aka I forgot I hadn't hooked it to the power) left my k6-2 450 without a fan for over a month & it didn't care (it wasn't even the 2.2v core, but the 2.4v), this btw was also in a heated apartment. Now more modern cpu's are a bit more finiky (aka athlon burns up in less than 10 secs without fan in heated room), but in -80F temps we aren't going to need that fan anyway. Use a really heatsink & be done with it!

      Though from your description you don't need such a cpu to run your bits and pieces. The way you felt the need to critisize most modern cpu's (alpha generates more heat than an athlon or P4 for instance) for something you don't even need to worry about in the first place amazes me. The fact that your uninformed about cpu's is the only reason I can understand this. Do some more research before posting...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    2. Re:Sorry, but all moving parts prone to failure. by tzanger · · Score: 2

      If it needs a fan, then that's a sign of a BAD DESIGN.

      Are you a designer?

      I install radio repeater controllers on mountain tops for various communications companies (radio, TV, cellular relay, business 2-way, etc.)

      Nope. Kindly keep your opinions stated as such and not as fact. Fans do NOT indicate bad design.

      Now to get on with business: Fans in designs are NOT a bad thing if the design calls for them. Your communications equipment won't be spitting out too much heat since the control likely runs off of 24VDC bussed from a single (redundant) power supply which can probably endure a colder environment. Your actual transmitters will throw out heat in proportion to their strength.

      Then you go on to say that the ambient is 80 below (degrees Farenheit) -- of course you won't need much to get rid of the heat! You've got a freaking 200 degree C temperature differential! If I'm not mistaken, you'll have heaters in the enclosures in order to keep the temp within component tolerances!

      Now let's come to the Real World (in the sense of consumer equipment) -- People like to be in a 20 degree C ambient, so their equipment will be in there as well. Commercial components are spec'd to operate between 0 and 70 degrees C. So there's 50 degrees to play with there, not counting heat thrown out by the power supply, hard drives, motherboard chipset and expansion cards. Heat sinks can only distribute and radiate so much heat. While I'm not saying that 60W for a processor is an efficient design, it is by no means poor. Poor design is when you don't meet the design spec.

      In the world of industrial equipment (I design for this environment) your components are rated -40 (I think, we don't run into the low end much) to 85 degrees C but you usually use commercial-rated components since your rarely in an enclosure that gets below zero. We too have equipment in the middle of nowhere where it's cold enough to freeze spit before it hits the ground and the location is unmanned. Know what though? It's the hot and/or high elevation remote locations which give us the most trouble. We literally have equipment in the amazon rainforest and in the Chillean mountain ranges (Andes?). Even when we have our power electronics bypassed we can't avoid generating 1 Watt / Phase / Amp (three phase equipment). This stuff has to go into NEMA 4 enclosures to keep the crap out. Fans are unacceptable here (watertight) so we need to oversize the enclosure in order to increase the air volume inside the enclosure and help get the heat radiated. In some cases we have to use industrial air conditioners (want to talk expensive? Try a NEMA 3R air conditioner!) in order to keep the heat down and that is in a design where we are already generating minimal heat! (you can't get much less minimal than a slab of copper!)

      Fans are out in this environment. Fans gunk up with dust and die. And a trip to fix it costs thousands of dollars. Actually *anything* with moving parts is out. The oil in fan motors and even in hard drive motors can gel up when it gets that cold. So we use solid state flash+static ram drives, and 486/25s that need no fans. Cursoe may finally be the next CPU upgrade because it runs cool without help.

      Yes and you have the money to spend on lower power equipment and cold-temp tech. The industrial world has MUCH higher price margins than even the least competitive commercial sales environment. Please try to keep that in perspective before bashing commercial designers.

      Fans are cheap, not perfect. Just because you have the advantage of a 200 degree temperature differential to improve your radiated heat transfer doesn't mean we all do. And just because you can afford to sell expensive technology (flash vs HDD) doesn't mean we all do.

  39. Cooling fan tip by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Install a big ol' 4" 12 Vdc fan, and run it off a 6 or 8 Vdc power supply - fan is way too big at full voltage, nice, quiet and adaquate air volumn at half power.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  40. Microfans won't reduce the noise by mairas · · Score: 1

    I doubt those microfans really would reduce the noise generated by the fans. First of all, the efficiency of air cooling is determined mainly by the volume velocity of the airflow, and you'll still have to blow the same amount of air with the microfan technology -- with fans with no aerodynamic/acoustic design. Size of the fan does matter, though. Usually bigger is better (quieter). Blade noise is easier to handle with big, slowly rotating blades. Microfans seem to move into opposite direction, suggesting they might be even noisier than conventional fans.

    There are ways to get rid of the noise, though. This site is a good starting point for screwing that silencer on your PC. Particularly, there was an interesting link to a Korean company, which is going to introduce a free-flow refridgeration system for computers. With that, you can throw away every (except the power source) fan from your computer. Hopefully it'll work as well as they tell.

    1. Re:Microfans won't reduce the noise by Snard · · Score: 2

      Well, if those fans were spinning at a million RPM, as suggested by the article, any noise they did generate would be in the ultrasonic range, don'cha think?

      --
      - Mike
    2. Re:Microfans won't reduce the noise by mairas · · Score: 1

      Well, if those fans were spinning at a million RPM, as suggested by the article, any noise they did generate would be in the ultrasonic range, don'cha think?

      The blade noise indeed might be. However, you would be pressing large amounts of air through a narrow hole, and that forced flow would still create audible effects. Air moving at a fast speed tends to create noise, as completely non-turbulent airflow is hard (impossible?) to achieve. And turbulence equals to rapid air pressure variations which, well, equals to sound.

  41. Re:above should be moderated up. by deglr6328 · · Score: 2

    New Scientist is a joke. If /. reporting on science wants to approach anything near journalistic integrity when it comes to science, they should be very wary of refrencing the infamous new scientist. The magazine will constantly publish any story they think will be the most sensationalistic, seemingly without even an attempt at fact checking. They still do stories touting so called cold fusion BS as "just around the corner" to providing the worlds energy. Other stories for instance on EMF's and cancer are totally biased and even get into using scare tactics to sell more copies. According to James Randi New Scientist even ran articles in the 70's and early 80's touting the validity of DOWSING! pardon but this magazine is almost total shit.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  42. Fan noise?? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Try sitting in my server room with the plexi doors on the racks open.

    10 compaq proliant 3000 servers (ML530 now) sound like you stuck your head in a jet engine.

    I see uses for silent hardware, like a library. But then you don't have to resort to exotic hardware to achive this. Just placing the computer in a closed case that is well ventilated or purchasing a premiuim enclosure in the first place. (Hard drives on rubber isolation mounts, and soft material grids on fan openings with rubber isolation mounts on the fans) make a huge difference. Try it. add rubber o rings around the mounting screws and then dont tighten them down so hard. makes a big difference. a little bit of engineering can achive huge changes.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  43. and how do we get air to these fans? by hfukuda · · Score: 1
    If these fans are grown on the silicon, how exactly do we get air to these fans? Silicon is too fragile, so they get encased in epoxy, which is what we see. I've never actually seen a chip with the silicon exposed other than showcase models.

    So what are they going to do? Drill little holes in the casing? That'll do wonders for manufacturing costs, I'm sure.

  44. The best fan design... by cluening · · Score: 1

    The best fan design I have ever seen was on my roommate last year's machine made by the wonderful Packard Bell company. I'm not sure what they were thinking when they did it, but they put 2 differently sized fans, one on top of the other, onto his processor to cool it. It was a socket design processor, so the first fan was the normal size of the processor, and then stacked on top of that fan's lower-left two thirds was a second, smaller fan. It was _really_ odd...

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:The best fan design... by Delphis · · Score: 1

      I bet the airflow was worse than crap too with all the turbulence created by both fans. That's Packard Bell though isn't it? .. just crap. Sad really and very difficult to comprehend just why they'd make such worthless machines. I remember seeing hoards of Packard Bell PCs stacked up awaiting repair behind the services counters of PC World stores (when I was still living in England).

      --

      --
      Delphis
  45. Growed by Fastball · · Score: 1

    I knew some people who growed some microjuana in their window sills. I growed but one microinch in high school. George W. Bush will be a full-growed adult male in four years.

  46. apparently Commander Taco has Dog hearing, or.. by pezpunk · · Score: 1

    maybe he's still using an 80086 (kaCHUNK kaCHUNK kaCHUNK kaCHUNK kaCHUNK "bad command or file name")

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  47. the comforting hum by TShrew · · Score: 1

    But I can't sleep anymore without the hum of computers in the background. And the best place in the office is in the server room with the hum of several computers as the only sound. I think it is kinda like the same reason you put a clock in the basket with a puppy you just bring home, to simulate the sounds of the womb. So don't take away all the noise or I will be lost..... -TShrew

  48. Noise is one thing... by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    Dust is another. How propose you cleaning the dust out of microfans? Or do you assume these only for clean rooms?

    I could knit a sweater out of the dust I've cleaned out of fans over the past 3 years.

    --

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  49. Re:fans are great, but better chipmaking is the wa by Calimus · · Score: 1

    Apple may have a fanless system, but the heat is still there. Not as much as there used to be, there has been progress made. Only real problem is, not everyone wants a Mac. Alot can be learned from Mac as well though, thanks for pointing out that the pc market isn't the only onw ith low power/heat offerings

    --
    Trying to be different, just like everyone else.
  50. No thnaks by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm not very enthusiastic about having moving parts in the most expensive component in my system, unless they're guaranteed not to reduce the chip life. I just had to get my video card replaced after 6 months due to a faulty fan. And it's tough enough cleaning the crud out of my normal-size fans. How am I going to do it with microfans?

  51. white noise by Locus27 · · Score: 1
    on the other hand, i find the noise of computer fans quite soothing. the white noise generated by it calms me down out of a near homicidal rage when my neighbor bitches about me blaring my stereo. not only that, i like the heat being pumped out of my case, which currently resides on my floor. it keeps my feet warm.

    when you talk of converting the excess heat into electrical energy, there are a number of ways. these micro-mechanical fans, once started, may be able to maintain sufficient velocity due to convection to drive equally miniture generators. the more practical option that springs to my mind is thermocouples. thermocouples are great, we use 'em all over the lab here. for those who don't know, a thermocouple is made by joining two dissimilar metals, that, when heated, produce electricity. unfortunately, thermocouples don't produce a lot of electricity. it's generally on the order of micro- to milli-volts, but it's because of this small scale that we use them to monitor process temperatures. we also use them because of their ability to take extremes. we use them to measure the temperature on our liquid nitro tanks, and at penn state we used them to monitor our oxidation furnaces, which ran at upwards of 1200 C. recycling this energy might knock a few bucks off your electriciy bill per year, maybe. it's really not worth it to bother figuring out a way to do it. not yet anyway. for now, i'd suggest warming your feet on your case, and your hands on your monitor.

  52. Will that really help? by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

    Even if the small fans could push a good volume of air, I think that most noise comes from the air moving over the heatsink. I have some fans that are silent when running out in the open, but put them to the heatsink and the air moving through the fins causes most of the noise. That's why I switched to watercooling; it is so much quieter.
    --------

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  53. the ultimate in fan speed by Locus27 · · Score: 1
    read this bit on turbo pumps. they're really cool. here

    we use turbos on some of our vacuum tools, and on our e-beam. the problem with turbos is that the older ones couldn't handle atmospheric pressure. they'd crash. the prinicple of a turbo spinning at that kind of speed is not to suck and push air like a normal fan, but to actually clobber air molecules and physically knock them down further through the fan. with all those tiny little fans moving at 1M rpm, my prediction is that it's all going to crash, spectacularly. imagine little tiny propellers, all flying off the chip assembly with amazing speed. shrapnel comes to mind. my advice, keep the speeds down to a reasonable level, and get some saftey glasses.

  54. Noise? by mrdisco99 · · Score: 1
    You think 3-4 PCs is loud?

    I have to work in a room with 22 Dell machines of varying scale, 4 RS/6000 workgroup servers, a waist high AS/400, a rackmount system containing an IBM M-80 and several drive racks, a dual frame SP system consisting of 10 nodes with accompanying VSS and 3494, and an air conditioning unit with air blowing in through the raised floor. It's a wonder I can hear myself think in here.

    Of course, the upside is that I get to actually see the cool stuff I'm working with and it's so loud and cold in here that people generally leave me alone.


    +++

    --

    +++
    NO CARRIER

  55. My silent A/V Linux machine by dsfox · · Score: 1

    I built a silent machine for my stereo, it was simple. Underclock a 600 MHz P3 to 400 MHz, remove the CPU fan, use a notebook hard drive and an Antec power supply with a thermally controlled fan. Voila!

  56. Loud Equipment by Koryon · · Score: 1

    I work at a microelectronics company, in the computer lab, I have an old digital scope, a nice (and loud) switching power supply, and a protocol analyser sitting at my desk. The scope and analyser have some sort of HP-brand SUPER fan in them, they're much louder than PC fans, the room also has the laptop I work at, two pentiums, two sparcstation 10s, a Sun ULTRA 5, an ULTRA 10, a nice big UPS, 4 external SCSI Hard drives and an external tape drive, plus an UltraSCSI box with 4 hard drives in it, now THAT's loud, an engineer who used to work here once told me a story of being in the room during a power failure...

    There was a big BANG from the industrial air conditioner, and then the slow sound of dozens of fans whirring down to nothing. And then he got this big-eyed amazed look and told me that you could actually hear footsteps in the room!

    I also once brought my "surprisingly quiet" laptop to class once, only to discover it was actually quite loud, and it made noises I hadn't even been able to hear a foot away from it in this room.

    -Koryon
    lemon@ee.unb.ca

    Also note: All the moniters are CAD sized, some of them are also very old (mid 80s Sun cad moniters), imagine all the radiation in the room...

  57. room filters. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    The solution for your dust problem is to get some sort of filter for your room

    yeah, like vacuuming it once in a while.

    --saint
    ----
  58. Outside noise better than inside noise by 406hepcat · · Score: 1

    For those of us in the digital media field, or for anyone who needs to minimize data errors without huge redundancy, these many internal fans could murder us. Digital audio's place inside a computer is like that little girl from the Pepsi commercials wandering around in Compton. I'm worried that all of these little fans whirring inside the box, although silent to the ears, would cause more pops and clicks than a 78 of Jimmie Rodgers that's spent 6 decades in the back of a Buick. Of course there's the matter of hardware failure, and it WILL happen. All hardware fails, even that big fan on the back of your beige box. But is anyone else worried about data integrity?

    --
    D. Morgan Jahnig Old Crow Medicine Show
  59. Quiet Computers by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

    My roommate's iMac is incredibly quiet. I had never noticed how loud my computers were until he got it. Sometimes you will hear the hard drive, however when it goes to sleep there is virtually no noise whatsoever. It is the only computer to be kept in a bedroom in our place due to this. This is due to the lack of fans which is made possible by the fact that G3 processors are incredibly low power/heat dissapation.

    The G4 cube systems have no fan either. I also understand that the new G4 powerbooks are likewise not cooled by a fan. Does anyone know what game systems are or are not fan cooled? If I am not mistaken I think that the PS, PS2, and N64 are not cooled by fans, however since I am mostly uninterested in consoles...

    Processor fans seem to be mostly an X86 thing due to the high amounts of heat dissapation for a 32 bit processor. My sister's Compaq laptop is fan cooled. My K6-2 would fry if I removed the fan, my overclocked p-166 (200) was having issues til I added another fan to the case, the fileserver in my apt, a P233MMX was having some issues when the proc fan started dying. I would imagine if Transmeta ever got around to putting some processors into PC desktops, maybe we could get something in as radical a form factor as the cube (and without a fan). The fact you can fry an egg on most x86 procs these days seems kinda sad. If it were an Alpha, or a Power, I could kinda see it.

  60. Just about everyone except WD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fujitsu, IBM, and Maxtor make the quietest set of drives. Seagate's and Quantum's lower-speed offerings are reasonably quiet, too. Just avoid Western Digital's. They scream like a banshee.

    1. Re:Just about everyone except WD by skadacl · · Score: 1

      Don't I know it :(
      I'm probably going to buy a new IBM 30gig ata100 though, so I can get rid of my noisy little WD.

      But anyways, These microfans sound like they'd be very useful. Think of how much you could probably overclock an athlon when it's supercooled by hundreds of little fans :)

  61. Over 100 fans on a chip by hattig · · Score: 1

    These fans are 1mm across in size. assuming that they can be placed side to side, on a 100mm2 chip there would be 100 fans, and on a 200mm^2 chip there would be 200 fans. Any noise they make would probably drive your dog mad after a few hours, bit nothing more.

    These fans rotate pretty slowly too. A typical fan can do anything from 3000RPM to 10000RPM, these do from 50 to 200RPM, so they are pretty slow at the moment. I doubt that they shift the same amount of air through them that a normal fan does.

    Now they guy talking about 1 million RPM fans... that would probably make your processor explode from the sudden vacuum between in and the fan when it started up. Any bits of dust going through the fan would probably smash through the computers case! I would love the sound of a 1MRPM fan in my house, honest!

    What the future should be is cooler running CPUs. Efficiency is the key. The Palomino CPUs from AMD will go a long way to cooling down the high end of the CPU market - they can run without a fan at 1GHz. Transmeta CPUs are great for the notebook market (unlike the 'cooler' PIIIs that generate 10W when running at full speed, but 0.5W when running at under half the speed).

    If one day I can have a powerful fanless computer - it doesn't have to be the bees knees in hardware - then I will be happy. The really powerful computer can go in the garage or in the loft and make lots of noise AFAIAC, and it can do all of the Divx and MP3 encoding. Shame I won't be able to play the latest and greatest in games, but then again I never get the time to play them, so no loss there.

    Seriously, I can do all the work I need to do on a 200MHz processor, or a 400MHz processor with MP3 player and some other stuff (and this is using Windows and Office 2000 and Outlook etc). If I ever wanted to play a game, then it would be nice for the processor to double its speed and turn on the fan whilst that was required, and then turn it off when it wasn't (same goes for the graphics card), but the only place you can use these processors is in laptops at the moment - hardly the ultimate gaming machines. AMDs PowerNow! technology will be supported in desktop chipsets soon though, which I hope will provide this functionality.

  62. Re:Why do you need all that power by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    Excessive ? Yeah, i guess i admit it is. But ram is so damn cheap, i couldn't resist. PC133 SDRAM is going at $94AUD now. (about $40USD per stick). I mean, christ, they're giving it away.

    A for Dual cpu's. My first box was a Dual P200 w/ 64mb ram. I picked up the m/b real cheap at an auction, got two P200's, dropped 'em in, and sweet. Windows NT never lagged. I mean, you could have big compiles running in MS VC++, or run Quake2 and play mp3s at once, or whatever, and the GUI never lagged! I burn CDs at 4x (all scsi system) while playing multiplayer games on the net, it rocks.

    So when upgrading time came, i KNEW i wouldn't settle for single cpu, so i went Dual again. I run Win2000 on it, and FreeBSD (though its not there atm, i need another hdd).

    Funnily enough, the machine i use the most is my measely little P166 32mb ram laptop :). lol! 802.11 wireless is sweet, though.

    What has this to do with fans? not much, now.

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  63. Growed??? by LordNimon · · Score: 2

    Jesus Christ, Taco, how stupid are you? "Growed" is not a word! You're supposed to be an editor, so edit, dammit.
    --

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Growed??? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      He was just being lazy about his trademarks.

      The microfans will be Growed(TM) in-place.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  64. Big! Small! Meso! Meso! Meso! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    As for microfans - they're not really even microelectronics. They belong in the region of "mesoscale," which means macroscopic but small.

    Communication throughput is suboptimally parameterized when culturally marginalized nomenclature ("jargon") is specified in negative relation to nomenclature which is itself based on logical contradiction stemming from inconsistent taxonomy.

    Putting it another way: the "micro" in "microelectronics" means "small" not "microscopic". So if "macroscopic" means anything in this context it means "big". So you just said "big but small". Hoist by your own jargon.

    __________________

  65. You are incorrect. by stego · · Score: 1

    I have two Macs. The Ruby iMac 400 has no fan. My Powerbook may as well not have one for as often as it comes into use - and I use this computer all day long.

  66. For the hard drive noise... by gfilion · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a Molex Silent Drive (http://www.silentpc.nl/prod04.htm), it reduces the hard-drive noise by more than 90%. This is really great!

    Advice for North-Americans, don't buy it from Nedcomp (http://www.nedcomp.com/), they charge 25$ for the silent drive and 35$ for shipping, without telling you first.

    GFK's

  67. One use for the heat by twitter · · Score: 2

    Use a thermocouple to drive a small CPU cooling fan! Oh wait...

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  68. Thinking in the noisy room by $pacemold · · Score: 1

    Now if they could just make hard drives silent, we finally could hear ourselves think in a room with 3-4 computers

    I use a special device to hear myself think.

    1. Re:Thinking in the noisy room by $pacemold · · Score: 1

      Sorry, link broken, dynamic site... Here it is:

      Molded, self-adjusting, tapered foam ear plugs expand to fit your ear canal. Soil-resistant surface, hypo-allergenic. NRR 29 dB. Disposable. 5 pair per box.

  69. HEY TACO! by _underSCORE · · Score: 1

    Hey taco, it's time you knowed...
    the word is grew instead of growed.

    Ooh... The Internet is on computers now, Good for it.
    -Homer Simpson

    --
    "This is not a company that appears to be bothered by ethical boundaries."
    Attorney General Mike Hatch on Microsoft
    1. Re:HEY TACO! by init6 · · Score: 1

      "growed" was part of the quote, not from tacoman.

  70. My fan was a vacuum cleaner in a past life... by Gruneun · · Score: 1

    How are we expected to clean these miraculous fans (provided they don't jam and burn themselves out)?

    I don't mean to sound cynical, but my fan collects so much dust that it looks like it was hidden between my couch cushions.

  71. Processor Power Dissapation... by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

    Excellent link at this site. The only problem is that it is partially in German. Use the fish if yah need to, however it is mostly obvious.

    Some exerpts:
    Processor___Mhz_______L1___Transistors__Pwr_Dissap ation__mm2___process
    G3cx________350-550___64k__21'500'000___4.0W_@400M Hz____42____.18
    G4_/_Max____350-500___64k__10'500'000___5.0W_@400M Hz____83____.15
    Mobile_Cel__266-400___32k__18'900'000___7.7W_@300M Hz____???___.25
    Coppermine__533-1133__32k__28'000'000___26.2W_@800 MHz___105___.18
    P3/E_Xeon___600-1000__32k__28'000'000___28.7W_@733 MHz___???___.18
    Willamette__1300-1500_20k__42'000'000___54.7W_@150 0MHz__217___.18
    K-7_(100Mhz)700-1000__128k_22'000'000___42W_@700MH z_____102___.18
    Alpha-EV67__667-750___128k_15'200'000___90W_@750MH z_____225___.25

  72. Sounds like a good idea... by hyoo · · Score: 1

    ...but what happens when these things become clogged with dust?

  73. Microfans for Intel? by tao · · Score: 1

    So if this makes it into the next processors from Intel, we can expect something akin to porcupines?! An interesting prospect...

  74. Ding ding ding, we have a winner! by Orifice · · Score: 1

    I was wondering how far down I'd have to scroll before someone threw in a Transmeta reference.

  75. Only on /. by tyrani · · Score: 1

    Will you see a topic on computer fans turn into a discussion on thermodynamics!

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  76. Rod logic by Orifice · · Score: 1

    Rod logic, combined with Code Morphing and nano-bots, should obviate the need for convective cooling. A well-designed nano-bot should be able to operate below the quantum of heat conductance, and turbo block coding can be used to inhibit entropy leakage. Please, this forum is stuck in the 20th century.

  77. silence? by vla1den · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure about silencing -- if you need to put 1000 of them they might became to be quite noisy. Here is what I came up recently looking for a silent computer solution:

    Molex Thermal Acoustic Products
    Directron: silent components
    The Silent PC
    Quiet PC (UK)
    Shut that damn thing up!


  78. HDs by KingKenny · · Score: 1

    > The Seagate drives are definitely the quietest, though

    I think Quantum would disagree with that. Their AS range are claimed to be the "world's quietest drive". The one I had was louder (spin whine) than their older LM, so I sent it back.


    cat /dev/null > /dev/brain

  79. Silent Hd's by mzo · · Score: 1

    If you wanna see hard drives with ZERO noise, check out nano hard drives at www.nanochip.com, those will be soo sweet when they finally get going...

  80. There is one use for noisy fan.... by paploo · · Score: 1

    I do have one use for noisy fans: As a college student, there is always a lot of noise emminating from the houses around me. Thank god (if I believed in him) for "white" noise. The volume of the fans drowns out everything except the loudest noises (like a party next door). It also drowns out people watching TV too loudly in the next room, and, when I had a room mate, his heavy breathing. :) Granted, whenever I want to record audio through a microphone, then I get this hum in the background. All in all, however, the noise has served me well. I even usually leave on my external CD-ROM burner (mounted in an old case with a really noisy fan), just to generate more white noise. (Oh, and don't call me crazy just because I find the hum of my computer's fans comforting).

  81. Microfans? I'd rather have the Superfans by sokoban · · Score: 1

    So, who would win in a processing match between Athlons and Pentium IIIs. Of course, Da Bears. Only, however if Ditka is on the Pentium III's side would that skimpy processor have a shot. I say Bears 77-3

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  82. Really quiet computers by steveha · · Score: 2
    I build my own computers. I make them as quiet as possible.

    I haven't tried this yet, but I want to make a silent computer with no hard disk at all -- it would boot from a network card.

    With a 100Mbps full-duplex Ethernet connection, a decent network switch, and a server with a fast hard disk tucked away into a clost, I believe that a completely diskless workstation would be nice and fast. 100Mbps is about 10MBps, which is exactly the speed of a fast narrow SCSI bus; not that bad. Just put in 256MB of RAM so the system doesn't need to swap. (Last time I checked, you could get 256MB of RAM for well under $200!)

    I'm typing this message on a computer I built, and by far the noisiest part of it is the CPU fan. (Anyone know of a really quiet Socket A cooling fan?) That's why I would love to buy one of those Transmeta Crusoe server-edition CPUs. With a big heat sink I wouldn't need a cooling fan.

    I have hopes that IBM or HP will make one of their "legacy-free" managed PCs like this. Then all I would need to do is just buy one.

    I have fond memories of typing on the Atari 520ST we used to have. No cooling fans, no hard drive... unless the floppy disk was whirring quietly, that thing was silent. Oh yes it was nice.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Really quiet computers by steveha · · Score: 1
      Heard of a thing called a Winterm?

      What a brilliant idea; too bad it doesn't have anything to do with what I want. I don't want Citrix; I do want Linux. I do want decent 3D graphics, a nice sound card, the ability to plug in a scanner, the ability to plug in a joystick... in short, I want what I said I want: a very quiet PC.

      By the way, have you ever heard of a thing called an X Terminal? That's another thin client that doesn't do what I want, and they first appeared long before Citrix.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    2. Re:Really quiet computers by the_Brainz · · Score: 1
      Sure, okay. A 10 Mbps link is actually 12.5 MBps, but I doubt you'd be able to maintain that as a peak. Still, most 5400 rpm ATA 66 hardrives wouldn't often get above that speed anyway. The only problem is setting up the network so your terminal will boot off the server. Probably with Linux it's easy--I'm no expert on Tux. But I do know that with Windows and DOS it's virtually impossible, this according to a good friend of mine who's tried his damndest without the benefit of Windows 2000 Server. I guess it depends what netcards you use also. It would probably still be a fairly tricky arrangement to work out, but you're right. It sure would be nice and quiet.

      Just in addition to this, I would like to take the time to wonder: I recently bought a 30 GB IBM DeskStar, 7200 rpm ATA 100 version (is there any other 30 GB version?) and, sure, it's quiet. But it's not silent. In fact, I can hear it quite clearly when it grinds. Admittedly my computer's side panel nearest to me is always off, so the hardrive is in plain view, and sure I have my box on my desk about half a metre from my head. What's the arrangement of all you people that claim not to be able to hear them? Hmm, here's another thing: I have no system fan, only one CPU fan and my little PSU fan at the back, so I can't claim my hardrive is inaudible because it's drowned out by the sound of whirring. But still, I can play music and still hear the hardrive when it's thrashing. Only thrashing though. I checked the IBM site, and yes, this is supposed to be the quietest hardrive on the market. I wonder if I got a dud. My new Philips monitor is having fuzziness issues, and smells a bit like something's burning inside...although it doesn't feel so hot on top...buying duds is something that happens to me a lot.

      It occurs to me now, that we aren't exactly on the topic any more.

      the_Brainz (Hey! I scored 83% on the SlashDot test!)

    3. Re:Really quiet computers by steveha · · Score: 1
      I recently bought a 30 GB IBM DeskStar [...] and, sure, it's quiet. But it's not silent.

      Yes, it's never going to be silent. IBM may claim it's the quietest drive around, but I'll bet the Quantum lct15 is actually the quietest.

      I built one computer using an lct10 (the predecessor of the lct15) and then put the drive in a SilentDrive acoustical jacket. That computer uses a K6-III with an extra-quiet cooling fan, and an extra-quiet power supply fan, and a video card with no cooling fan at all. It is pretty darn close to a silent computer.

      P.S. While searching for the URL that goes with SilentDrive, I stumbled across a pretty good page about really quiet PCs.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  83. Any fluid dynamicists out there? by Orifice · · Score: 1

    Okay, my fluid dynamics is a little rusty. But won't these fans be operating well below the dissipation range for turbulent eddies in air, and consequently won't most of the energy from these fans go right back into heat rather than bulk air motion?

  84. Problem? by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1

    I dont know about you guys, but I've had fans die from dust (OK!! I'll clean out my server closet! jeez...) but..wouldnt one tiny speck of dust kindof..break a bunch of these fans? seems to me that that could lead to, well, problems (CPU BBQ anyone?)

    --
    The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  85. G4 in various context by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    So we can have several valid comparisons:
    Clock for Clock
    $$ for $$
    'Performance' for 'Performance

    Clock for Clock, it would seem that both dissipate the same amount of power; 14W
    That, however, doesn't tell us how much 'performance' the processor generates per Watt, as it were. A Gateway Select 1200 with similar options (but a faster processor) $2341 vs an Apple G4 667MHz tower for $2799.

    So there is definitely a $450 delta between the two. The G4 gives off 14W, the Athlon at ~55W. If we want, we can do the math that 2x MHz and 3.7x energy dissapation.

    As per performance, everyone thinks/knows that a G4 on Photoshop beats the pants off anything else on the market, supposedly, but we have that on a clock per clock, the G4 supposedly outperforms but has the same wattage, while at max MHz, the G4 *still* supposedly outperforms and uses much less watts.

    Now, how about non-Photoshop? I dunno.

    Geek dating!

  86. a correction by twitter · · Score: 1

    The noise that I heard months ago was the hard drive. It was almost as noisy as a fan.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.