Slashdot Mirror


Exodus Files For Chapter 11 Protection

rit writes: "Albeit a bit expected, it is shocking to find that Exodus Communications has gone ahead and filed for bankruptcy. Exodus is one of the largest hosting facilities, and their major competitor, Above.net (owned by MetroMedia Fiber) is in pretty much the same boat ... circling the metaphorical drain of the dot-com world." Note that filing for protection from creditors while reorganizing is not the same as hanging up a big "closed" sign -- Exodus is still operating, and hopefully will be able to keep the LEDs turned on for a good long while (since Slashdot is hosted there).

266 comments

  1. sungard's gonna have a field day by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

    damn... sungard is going to pick up all the business that these guys have...

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:sungard's gonna have a field day by trippd6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI

      Sungard doesn't really do collocation. They do disaster recovery services... they are not even close....

      You pay sungard a monthly fee, kind of insurance, if you datacenter burns to the ground, or otherwise, you declair a disaster, and go there and rebuild. They supply space, servers, everything you need to rebuild your business, including desks/desktop computers if you want to pay for it...

      I talk from experence, I worked for a company that used sungard, and about 6 months ago we went to thier AZ facility to run a Disaster Recovery test.... We ran everything on very large NT servers, and they had to do some specail stuff for us, because they've never had to provide NT servers so big... they mainly do mainframes and large unix boxes....
      -Tripp

    2. Re:sungard's gonna have a field day by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      when i was at sungard, they were making large gestures to-location. i distictly remember people bitching about exds' multiple and how sds should be well above it.

      the facilities to do data recovery and warehousing are not that much different than to do colocation.

      the subsidiary i was working at started push an ASP model, which sds proper will love to co-locate once its big enough.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  2. Money was spent on the decor!! by billmaly · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been inside an Exodus facility. If they'd spent a little less on decor and "Gee Whiz" security features, they might be in a little less trouble. Must admit though, the plasma LED and the palm scanner for access were quite cool! :)

    Bill

    1. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Plutor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I spent a lot of time inside an Exodus facility myself (in Jersey City, NJ). I have to say that it was ugly. Exactly what I expected, and wanted, in a hosting facility. Their tech support was real friendly and helpful too. And those "palm scanners" are really pretty cheap. I've worked at retail stores that used the same model.

      Here's hoping exodus stays afloat. Like I said, the people who worked there were really great.

    2. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by benedict · · Score: 2

      I used to compare Exodus/J.C. to a casino ... with no clocks and no sunlight, it's really easy to lose track of time.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    3. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Mad+Browser · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except Exodus is a lot colder and ALL you hear is whirring fans... Gets a little freaky after awhile...

      Why did I lock myself in the cage? Uh, the door must have shut... Not like I was freaked out or anything...

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    4. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by hillct · · Score: 2
      This statement from their press release:
      not anticipating the decline as the dot.com bubble burst
      Every economist I know knew the .com bouble was going to burst. Granted no one knew when, but whatever happened to the general principle of 'Don't debt-finance a tech company' because revenues were not predictible. Granted 14 consecutrive quarters of sequential growth might appear predictable, but that's no excuse to abandon basic business principles.

      I know everyone did it, but if your friend jumped off a bridge, would you... (you get the point).

      --CTH
      --

      --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    5. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by benedict · · Score: 2

      Well yeah, and there aren't any free drinks, or scantily-clad women.

      I did usually start to go slightly bugfuck after a few hours at that facility. When my job started to require that I spend a *lot* of time there, I started looking around for a new one.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    6. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so true. Thier London facility has one way doors with hand scanners. I was there durring a fire drill, it took 1 1/2 hours for the employees to get back into the building through that damn door. funny thing is that I got back into my cage by going around the back of the building & up the scafolding.

    7. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I definitly agree with the last post. I work at Exodus, and after you spend 12 hours or so in the IDC you start going nuts. The constant hum of A/C, fans, and the sub 60 degree temperatures have quite an effect.

    8. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by valdezjuan · · Score: 1

      These things are a requirement for some of there customers. Most financial and government customers will have all these questions and demands on security. Things like: Are your windows bullet proof? What are your plans if there is a bomb threat? There are many security certifications that place requirements on where your servers are placed and what/who protects them.

      Perhaps if they hadn't racked up a 3.5 billion dollar debt, bought Global Center and every thing else under the sun they would be in a better position. It was estimated that 80% of the data center space will go empty next year. Exodus owns a very large chunk of that. When times started getting tough for them a large number of customers pulled out. That had to hurt to hurt there bottom line a bit.

    9. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the $300,000/month rooms with the faraday shields... I thought THAT one was a winner....

    10. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Elizaf · · Score: 1

      As a person who claims to have been in "the" building during a fire drill, you neglect to mention which Exds facility in London you were in.....There were 3 customer sites owned by them at one point as well as a further three administrative buildings. I am presuming that it was park Royal that you were in, a huge multi-buildings site. The reason for the finger scanners is to ensure that in the event of a REAL fire that the security staff have a list of the people that were in the building and can ensure that all of them got out. That story about you skimming up any scaffolding is nonsense because the security doors to the customer facility would not let you in without having first received authorisation from you having checked in @ the front door. Tsk.......some people.... Eliza....Ex-Exds and Ex-GCTR

    11. Re:Money was spent on the decor!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work there too, and boy do I start to go nuts towards the end of my shift.

      The only thing that keeps me sane is going through all the crap the customers leave in their cages. I've found a ton of software, a couple of palm pilots, books, music cd's and walkmans, etc.

      Give it a try! It makes the time pass a lot quicker.

      (PS - You DO know the camera systems are a joke right?)

  3. /. Exodus by drodver · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If the /. effect takes hold maybe they don't deserve to stick around! :)

  4. Slashdot may want to rethink... by Xenopax · · Score: 0, Funny

    First VA Linux, then Exodus, next thing you know we'll find out that slashdot's boxes are running on BeOS!

    1. Re:Slashdot may want to rethink... by re-geeked · · Score: 2

      You make it sound like Slashdotters are a bunch of parasites that just suck up bandwidth and disk space while never clicking through any ads because we've junkbuster'ed them.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      "You can't get something for nothing." - my grandfather, on the stock market and Reaganomics.
  5. Funny how IBM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...has hosting facilities right next door to Exodus in a lot of cities. Makes it easy to "walk next door", perhaps?

  6. How do you run up a tab of $4.5 billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'll bet HSBC are pretty p*ssed - they're owed about $2 billion.

    1. Re:How do you run up a tab of $4.5 billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that more like $2.85 billion? I hope we still get bonuses!

    2. Re:How do you run up a tab of $4.5 billion by displaytest · · Score: 1

      HSBC is actually not owed that money; they're just serving as a trustee for the noteholders. The noteholders are the ones who actually lent money to Exodus, the trustee is just an administrative agent who wires money from the company to the noteholders, represents them when they need to act as a group, and serves as a central contact for the them.

  7. At least they named themselves well... by xFoz · · Score: 5, Funny


    Dictionary.com defines:Exodus

    exodus
    n.
    1. A departure of a large number of people.

    1. Re:At least they named themselves well... by jiheison · · Score: 1

      Dictionary.com defines:Duh

      duh (d)
      interj.
      Used to express disdain for something deemed stupid or obvious, especially a self-evident remark.

    2. Re:At least they named themselves well... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1
      So what should happen to Amazon, using this name theory?


      Will they eventually be beaten into the ground by female warriors? (And would they especially mind, or just take photos? ;) )


      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    3. Re:At least they named themselves well... by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      Just like much of the Amazon rainforest, amazon.com will soon meet a good team of slash and burn corporate types who will level the company to make way for a more profitable enterprise.

  8. Slashdot hunts for new hosting service by Bonker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vendor 1: "You had *how many* hits during the World Trade Center Crisis? Jesus Christ! I don't think we served that much data in 1998 and 99 put together!"

    Vendor 2: "We can host your website, but we'll need to add some servers... and some bandwidth capabilities... and some reinforced steel floors to keep those servers from damaging the foundation when they crash and...:"

    Taco: "How Much?"

    Vendor 2: "One Million Dollars! Err... One Hundred Billion Dollars!"

    Vendor 3: (Runs away crying)

    Vendor 4: Of course I can host your website Mr. Malda. All you need to do is sign here on the dotted line... in blood please. Your harem of Natalie Portman clones and your Beowulf Cluster of Slashdot Cruisers will also be arriving shortly. Thank you for doing business with us. I assure you that your soul will be in *very* good hands.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Slashdot hunts for new hosting service by The_Messenger · · Score: 0, Informative
      You guys overestimate Slashdot's traffic. Sure, they're busy -- for a FUD weblog. But in the league of major news and portal sites, Slashdot's traffic is nothing. As for the dreaded "Slashdot Effect," notice how it only affects smaller sites. Notice that Slashdot has never DOSed the New York Times, and they link to NYT every day... to NYT, Slashdot's traffic is insignificant.

      Trust me, I've seen real traffic -- if you ever have a chance, check out the access logs for major newspapers' sites. WashingtonPost.com gets more traffic in the wee hours of the morning than Slashdot got on Nimba Day (based on Malda's notes about hits/second). Jokes about Slashdot's "huge traffic" may be amusing to newbies, but really, come on -- Slashdot doesn't even rate an Akamaization.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

    2. Re:Slashdot hunts for new hosting service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, slashdot's codebase falls down dead every week, and several times during that WTC mishap. Of course, even catastrophic failure didn't stop malda from blowing his horn about his legendary geek powers.

    3. Re:Slashdot hunts for new hosting service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times I have to say this ?
      Malda is not a geek or a nerd or whatever.
      He has clearly marketing and management talents, but I wouldn't hire him to write a 3 line shell script.

    4. Re:Slashdot hunts for new hosting service by Electrum · · Score: 1

      Or pr0n :) When you have racks of servers pushing 10-80mbit constantly, a few hundred extra hits a second for the "Slashdot Effect" is nothing.

    5. Re:Slashdot hunts for new hosting service by consumer · · Score: 1

      If you look at sites like http://mediametrix.com/, you'll see tha Slashdot doesn't get enough traffic to put in the top 50 most popular sites. It probably doesn't get enough to put it in the top 500. It's a small site by most measures, and the proof is that they can keep it going with a tiny handful of Intel machines.

  9. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this was on reuters two days ago

  10. We're Hosted at Exodus by Mad+Browser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My company is also hosted at Exodus. I must say that as far as service goes, they have been TOP NOTCH. Really helpful.

    Engineer on duty helping troubleshoot interface errors at 3am. That stuff counts...

    Also, at our IDC, the conference rooms are named after James Bond movies! Cool!

    Their IDC's are impressive facilities and I sincerely hope that they stay around...

    Our sales rep was a casualty of this chapter 11 filing... Too bad, he is a nice guy.

    --
    RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    1. Re:We're Hosted at Exodus by Mad+Browser · · Score: 1

      I should mention that the interface errors were on our side, not theirs... Otherwise I would have expected nothing less... We were pleasantly surprised.

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    2. Re:We're Hosted at Exodus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, at our IDC, the conference rooms are named after James Bond movies! Cool!

      Memo:

      Don't forget that we have our staff meeting in the Ocotopussy room this afternoon at 3.


      I'm all for that!

    3. Re:We're Hosted at Exodus by djhertz · · Score: 0

      We are too. I was the hosting admin for my computer and loved having exodus. We recently moved when their stock dropped out. We didn't move because of the service, but politics. Our customers know that we use exodus, see this news, and get scared and run to our competitors. Kind of lame from the techie sit to risk a move like this, but from 'upper management' it makes sense!

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise - William Shakespeare
    4. Re:We're Hosted at Exodus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As one of the employees @ your IDC, I'd just like to say thank you for your kind words.

      We really try to make things right for the customer all around. And though I'm deeply saddened that our financials are poor. I'm confident that if we can just get that debt restructured, we'll be back in no time.

      Exodus, right now, does a billion in revenue each year. That's a solid number, and I think the Bankrupcy Court will agree.

      We're gonna me around for a while, even if the name on the letterhead has to change.

  11. 1 year ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1 year ago, we started a new web application. We already had a cage at Exodus, but we need more room. It was almost impossible to get a 8 rack cage at that time. We managed to finally get one, and we set up our equipment. Since that time, I haven't been back there for about 8 months. Just went back there the other day and was suprised to see empty cages galore.

  12. lets be honest by Johnny5000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how many of us are going to be crying ourselves to sleep at night if the commercialization of the internet ends and it's back to the way it used to be in the good old days?

    I hate to see Exodus go out of business as much as anyone else, but to make an omlette...

    -J5K

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    1. Re:lets be honest by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1
      I don't think that's what would happen. Instead, we would see only the highest volume companies stay in business, along with fewer choices. This may be where it's headed anyway.

      I wonder why Exodus is going out of business. Is it because they aren't charging enough for their services? If so, I've been thinking, maybe there's too many free/cheap services available on the internet and in order for a company to survive, they need to really charge what they're worth.

      Seeing things like this happen though, I think it's good for the internet in the long run. Things can't go along at a crazed pace forever. Things need to get shaken up. When the dust settles, we can see where we're at, and move on again.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    2. Re:lets be honest by bugg · · Score: 2
      For as long as there are idiots bringing down IRC networks with massive denial of service attacks, that's not going to happen.

      For as long as I can't find new things on gopher, that's not going to happen.

      For as long as I'm typing on slashdot, that's not going to happen.

      --
      -bugg
    3. Re:lets be honest by drsoran · · Score: 1

      It's also time to start charging DSL and Cable modem users the real cost of the bandwidth they're using. Those rates should be at least $400/month for 1 Megabit/sec services. Unfortunately they're being kept artificially low which will eventually spell the end of high speed consumer access entirely until there is another quantum leap in technology available for the home user like fiber to the house or wireless.

  13. Inflow, too by forkboy · · Score: 1

    They're considered by many to be Exodus's chief competition. Watch these guys get huge.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    1. Re:Inflow, too by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      well.. sungard is this really large, old company with an insane amount of cash and no debt.

      they LOVE recurring revenue streams.

      specialty is data recovery and data warehousing... they could take over exodus's customers without skipping a beat...

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:Inflow, too by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

      Ticker symbol SDS? (I don't know if that's them or not...) Share prices are under $25 right now...

    3. Re:Inflow, too by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      They're considered by many to be Exodus's chief competition. Watch these guys get huge.

      Did anyone else read the post?

      Note that filing for protection from creditors while reorganizing is not the same as hanging up a big "closed" sign -- Exodus is still operating, and hopefully will be able to keep the LEDs turned on for a good long while

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    4. Re:Inflow, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and when CmdrTaco can't pay the geek compound mortgage, has no job, no money, his stock options are worthless, and he moves back in with his parents and spends all day sleeping and all night masturbating to skinema and eating cookie dough by the pound, he'll deny he's homeless, too.

    5. Re:Inflow, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exodus is still operating, yes, but that doesn't mean they aren't going to loose a lot of customers because of the Chapter 11 filing. Many big co-lo customers _are_ stable accounts. They've found ways to make money, and have been able to do so even during recent troubles. Some of these places make insane amounts of money to the point where a few minutes worth of downtime will cost them big bucks. These people are and will be looking to have back up facilities somewhere else in case Exodus does have to shut down. That way they'll have the site up and running no matter what happens to Exodus, and the lengthy transition phase will have already happened.
      Some of them are big enough to worry about Exodus closing, but not big enough to be able to afford two colo facilities. These are the ones that will be leaving now, if they can get decent contracts at other places.

      I work as a tech at Inflow. We are definitely a major Exodus competitor. Long before this we have been eating at their business, offering better prices, more managed services, and much better customer service (Inflow's customer satisfaction is in the 98% range, and we've never lost a customer due to disasitisfaction with service). We have definitely seen an increase in the number of companies looking to move their servers out of Exodus. It's going to be a busy month for us...

      Inflow has not gone public yet, but we had planned to until the market bubble burst. Right now we have enough cash in the bank to run at current levels for over a year. We're about to go cash-flow positive. We're in a very good market position, and we've had several other colo companies call our CEO trying to get us to buy them out (we didn't).

      Once the business cycle starts swinging the other way, I'm going to be _real_ happy with my stock options...

  14. Not Very Bankrupt by 1alpha7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They have a commitment for as much as $200 million financing from GE Capital, "which will be used to fund operating expenses and supplier and employee obligations". They won't be under for long. This really is just a reorganization.

    1Alpha7

    --
    Live to be Moderated
    1. Re:Not Very Bankrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a recent employee, there ain't much to reorganize. They've already laid off or squeezed out just about anyone technically competent who can do anything on the customer end.

      But the hand scanners worked fine for me and were kinda cool... though I tended to have the music from "Get Smart" playing in my head as I came in.

    2. Re:Not Very Bankrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're $4bn in debt, $200m don't seem like much, especially if they've still got a high burn rate.

  15. Quality of service by man_ls · · Score: 1

    The thing that always sticks out in my mind about Exodus is that their router in Chicago was #$%^ed up for about a month over the summer, making it impossible to play EverQuest. About 80% of packets were dropped going through that node. That's fine for web pages - TCP/IP is designed with packet loss in mind, and it resends packets and all that if it doesn't quite make it. On the other hand, a UDP game doesn't have all that error checking built in, and if you drop more than about a dozen packets in a row, you've lost the connection.

    They repaired the problem, but that always sticks out in my mind, that they didn't quite have it together for a long time. And the less enlightened people blamed it on Sony.

    J.W.

  16. Wow!!!!! by Wariac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Note that filing for protection from creditors while reorganizing is not the same as hanging up a big "closed" sign

    Wariac

    --
    Remember it, write it down, take a picture, I dont give a fsck!
  17. Same operating characteristics as banks ... by LL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... in that they sorta borrow money long-term (equity) and lend it short-term (purchasing depreciating hardware). Now this is OK if people are idiots enough to pay obscene amounts (dot.con) like clueless venture capitalists but if you get the situation where all your customers disappear (dot-bomb), you are left with a nice little term called negative cash-flow.

    Seriously, unless the costs hit marginal pricing level, you have to be very very good to make money in the deflatory environment that Moore laws produces (as can be seen by the dire straits of many PC box-pushers).

    Conclusion ... buy monopolies like underwater sea cables.

    LL

    1. Re:Same operating characteristics as banks ... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Don't forget, the VCs made their killing as soon as the IPO hit...

      maru
      www.mp3.com/pixal

  18. Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 5, Informative

    Picked up from an article on zdnet.

    ...

    The Exodus data centre in California, one of 43 worldwide, sits utterly undistinguished amid the sprawl fanning out from Los Angeles International Airport. The company's name doesn't even appear on the building, but the unassuming facade, which is wrapped in bulletproof Kevlar, belies its extremely high security, almost to the point of paranoia.

    Inside, a biometric hand scanner, another layer of bulletproof glass, two Pinkerton security guards, and a 500-pound door block access to 66,000 climate-controlled square feet of Internet servers, the online backbones of Exodus clients like Best Buy, eBay, KPMG Consulting, British Airways, Virgin, Merrill Lynch, Yahoo, and some 4,500 other customers. It's estimated that as many as one-third of all Internet clicks pass through Exodus servers. In a real sense what's behind that 500-pound door is, well, the Internet.

    ....

    One third of all clicks.. whew..!

  19. Who Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm about to start running a (very high volume) site. Who would you choose to host right now?
    AboveNet?
    Verio?

    1. Re:Who Now? by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > Who would you choose to host right now?

      Conxion - check out who their top three customers are... (Microsoft, Oracle, Symantec for Linux bodgers).

    2. Re:Who Now? by ilovecheese · · Score: 0

      Above net is about as screwed as the rest of them are. Their financials are about the same as Exodus. Plus, their gateways like to dissapear every once in a while.

      Go with Verio, Qwest, or anyone else.

    3. Re:Who Now? by kalanar · · Score: 1

      My experience with Verio is not very good. Besides the fact of double billings, they have a router that hasn't been fixed in about a years worth of opened tickets. At one point, I was calling and reopening a ticket a day because of 75% packet loss through one of their gateways. Not fun for an ISP.

      I'm not for sure how Qwest is for hosting, but that would be the first place Id check.

      What about Rackspace? Anyone deal with them?

    4. Re:Who Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former AboveNet employee, I can honestly say that I hope to God they're not the winners in the end. Any company that spends over $100,000 on a 2 story floor-to-ceiling bulletproof window just to let the average schmuck on the sidewalk peer into the NOC just deserves to die a screaming horrible death.

      Beyond that, their admins were total dweebs and their network constantly crashes. But according to their literature (and internal propaganda) they handle over 50% of the bandwidth for the _entire_internet_!! Wowwee!!

      [sigh]

    5. Re:Who Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have been at Exodus for nearly two years now and I would still recommend going with them..The service is great and the admins in the noc very knowledgable.. The company will resturcture but it will not go away.. There are companies much larger than ours still moving in even now..

    6. Re:Who Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verio at least has deep pockets ... with NTT as its parent ... so the'll be arround for some time.

    7. Re:Who Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AboveNet is doomed, Verio is your best bet. They just laid some ppl off, but they're owned by NTT. NTT is a huge japanese company, on the same scale as IBM.

      On top of that, with deeper pockets, they're certain to give deeper discounts than anyone else.

  20. A note from an employee by Dimwit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work in the Managed Security Services department of Exodus (disclaimer: these opinions are my own, not Exodus's)...

    I can say that fiscal policy was pretty lax for a while, and I'm afraid it still might be. The purchase of GlobalCenter was also probably the biggest nail in our coffin - it weighed us down with a lot of debt and didn't really accomplish anything. Sure GC was our biggest competitor, but they would've gone under without our help after the dot-com crash.

    I hope to keep my job, at least for a while longer. The people are nice, the company pays for school, my boss is good on letting me schedule myself as I please...It's been a fun ride. I'm just surprised at the swiftness of the demise. I feel bad that I've kept my job, when several of my friends have been laid off all around me (I was unfortunate enough to witness several of the layoffs personally.)

    Either way, I've got other job oppurtunities lined up, so I'm not too scared. However, anyone who sees a resume for someone with Exodus experience, please consider them - they'll be worth the money.

    --
    ...but it's being eaten...by some...Linux or something...
    1. Re:A note from an employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a former GlobalCenter employee, I have to agree. Exdous made the mistake of purchasing Globalcenter for a lot of stock - but not as much as the original deal was supposed to be. The IDC I worked at was mostly empty, but we had something at GC that Exodus didn't have a dedicated team. When you called in, you'd eventually get the same person(s). They knew your configuration - so at 3am when your servers died, they could help you qucikly. When we transitioned to Exodus - the teams went away, and you just monitored. I got put into Mananged Services, but then the bottom started falling out. Glad I got out when I did.

      An ex-Globalcenter/Exodus employee.

    2. Re:A note from an employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From another ex-GC person, I agree with the views expressed above. GC professional services emphasised managing things on an ongoing basis, and a more integrated approach that involved, for example, read only access to the backbone network for Technical Account Managers (professional services). When EXDS took over, it went straight to rigid departmental lines and professional services setting customers up, then abandoning them to the tender mercies of the under-educated NOC's (great guys, just not much experience). In GCTR, when a TAM installed you, he/she stayed with you, and that included being on call for you if you booked enough of their time. Funnily enough, now exds wants things to be that way too....plus ca change

    3. Re:A note from an employee by oob · · Score: 1

      I have to disgaree with you on the quality of technical Exodus employees. I have dealt with a number of hosting companies over the years, including PSI-Net, Level3, NTL and Exodus here in the U.K. and can say that in my experience the calibre of Exodus employees is extremely low. Let them near your equipment at your own risk.

  21. OSDN by INicheI · · Score: 0

    OSDN is going to have to figure something out. Too many tech companies are going down, I am glad my website is small and part time. Phew.

  22. Alternative choices for Slashdot by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Hosting.com has a web farm in CharlseTown, Mass. right near the new Bunker Hill Bridge. Huge place.

    Just in case.

    Since you happen to be right down the road.

    (Local headquarters in Woburn, I think.)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Alternative choices for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOSTING.COM? You mean the ex-HarvardNet hosting facility? You couldn't be serious, right? Why jump from the frying pan in the fire to even MORE FIRE?!

      Apparently you've not read their storied history or else you're hosting there already and have fooled yourself into thinking they can hold a candle to a place like Exodus.

  23. Slashdot's ass is on the line by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

    It seems to me that dumping an unprofitable bandwidth hogging organization such as Slashdot would be an ideal restructuring move in the eyes of Exodus' execs. That would be a real bummer, Slashdot is such a vivid part of the Innurnet culture.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Slashdot's ass is on the line by Mad+Browser · · Score: 1

      You don't think Exodus is making money off of Slashdot?

      I'm sure they negotiated a good rate but Exodus is probably making money... Or at least getting something from OSDN to offset the cost of the bandwidth they have committed to from their own providers...

      Anyway, Exodus management has been very aggressive at selling additional services to existing customers like managed firewalls, backups, etc...

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    2. Re:Slashdot's ass is on the line by cnkeller · · Score: 2
      It seems to me that dumping an unprofitable bandwidth hogging organization such as Slashdot would be an ideal restructuring move in the eyes of Exodus' execs.

      Huh? How do you figure. Exodus is having a hard time generating revenue, hence the filing for Chapter 11. How can you generate revenue if you drop your customers? I've never been in the ISP business, but I would imagine you'd want to negotiate a competitve rate plan to keep the few customers that you do have (Slashdot being one) from telling you to kiss their ass and going to another hosting provider.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    3. Re:Slashdot's ass is on the line by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      Or, in short:
      Slashdot is hosted there
      ...for how much longer?

    4. Re:Slashdot's ass is on the line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you generate revenue if you drop your customers?

      If you're running an all-you-can-eat resturant, you generate revenue by dropping those of your customers who eat too much.

    5. Re:Slashdot's ass is on the line by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Did you not know that the customers at a colocation facility pay for bandwidth?

      maru
      www.mp3.com/pixal

  24. infrastructure protection by Lovejoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With PSINet tanking bad, Exodus on the Rocks and Above.net far behind (Not to mention Rhythms, Northpoint, etc..) , we have to start asking ourselves: "Do we have a vital national security interest in seeing these networks survive?" I think we do.

    Sure you can scream "Corporate Welfare" all day, but when the rubber hits the road (or whatever cliche' you like to use) we have got to insure the stability of these networks, notwithstanding the costs involved.

    Question:
    Does anyone know how close these troubled companies are to shutting down?

    How do we do an effective cost-benefit analysis on bailing out these networks? (Which ones to help, etc..)

    Who gets left holding the bag on these debts if the federal gov't decide to force them to keep operating and their vendors to keep supplying them?

    1. Re:infrastructure protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the NSA would just buy all the hosting services then they would not have to duplicate all that data in echelon. It could be a great cost savings. Imagine half the hardware and get paid to snoop

    2. Re:infrastructure protection by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not a qualified financial analysist, but the companies you listed are far from the only backbones in the nation, and the ones that will remain are well set-up to take the load.

      Qwest's network would probably be the bext example.. their stocks have been declining slowly the past three months, but everyone's been declining lately. At the start of September it was still twice the value of Exodus. Basically, the people who own the wires will survive. That's what people have been saying for a long time; even during the height of the dot.com rush. AFAIK, Exodus just bought or leased lines from Worldcom and the like, which is what a lot of so called 'backbones' have been doing.

      What I see happening is an ISP fallout. As providers shut down, big businesses who need hosting will cluster into the survivors. Hosting facilities will become more and more rare, and the people who can actually afford hosting will be forced to cluster into the remaining facilities. Eventually the supply will dry up, and demand will exceed the supply. Then we'll find a much more stabilized industry.

      Fewer players at that point, but more stability.

    3. Re:infrastructure protection by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We can't spend money on bailing out the ISPs and hosting facilities, we have to spend it on the airlines.

      Funny, both industries got themselves into the mess they're in. Why are we bailing either of them out again?

      (And yes, I know that if the airlines blow up, many many other businesses hurt. Thanks. How is that not true of Exodus?)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:infrastructure protection by matt-fu · · Score: 1

      Qwest is a good example of being well set up to take the load? Maybe you're thinking of a different "Qwest" than I am, but a company I do consulting for has several racks worth of hardware colo'd at the New Jersey facility and the IP service absolutely sucks.

    5. Re:infrastructure protection by cjsnell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't kid yourself. These companies are not tanking because of the downturn of the internet economy. They are tanking because they flushed good cash down the toilet. Take a tour of an Exodus datacenter and you'll see what I mean. Bulletproof glass. Alarmed manhole covers. Biometric (hand and body weight) entrances. Armored CAT5 cable. It's nuts, really. When is the last time you heard about someone storming into a datacenter and stealing, for example, one of Best Buy's Web servers? The way that these companies spent money is almost
      criminal. It must have been like an everyday Christmas for their purchasing folks. The "build it and they will come" mentality is what killed them.

      Like hell this country should spend tax dollars to keep these con men afloat

    6. Re:infrastructure protection by Pope · · Score: 2

      Telus, a big telecom here in Canada, is apparently buying out PSInet to get their hands on all that infrastructure (not to mention customers). Don't know how it'll affect the US operations, just a blurb I saw on the news a day or two ago.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    7. Re:infrastructure protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lovejoy said ""Do we have a vital national security interest in seeing these networks survive?" I think we do."

      Question: why?

      I mean it's a big assertion, wheres the big proof?
      Nobodies going to go dig up the fiber optic to sell it on the international "little bitty strips of glass" black market. Nobodies going to buy one of these bombproof datacenters (assuming that reorganizing might even include that, quite an assumption IMO) and turn it into a rave warehouse. Sorry they're having trouble, but "national security"??? BK425

    8. Re:infrastructure protection by Lovejoy · · Score: 1

      Let's talk about preserving the networks and the resources, not necessarily the companies. If they go under, are they going to sell their resources piecemeal, destroying the functionality of their networks? What about the capital invested in these bombproof hosting centers? One would assume they should still be hosting centers for someone. They can't be easily converted to something else. How do we insure continuity if these huge companies go belly-up? Laissez-faire? OK. What are the implications of that?

      Thanks for pointing out the wanton spending of these companies. I can't speak to any other companies, but when I worked for one of them, we got a weekly e-mail about "reserving the company jet." I'll bet that's not happening anymore.

    9. Re:infrastructure protection by royoloco · · Score: 1

      Telus is in fact only purchasing the Canadian portion of PSINet. They are not in a position to assume the debt of the entire PSINet operations. It's also not a good option considering that in March this year Merryl Lynch valued the Co. at $500 milion...and they were 3.6 billion under at that time! What is motivating them to purchase the Canadian operations is to obtain an instant presence in the biggest Canadian market, namely Ontario. Bell Canada has always had a dominating presence in the Onario market, and also has a majority stake in Alliant (Eastern provinces). However, Cable & Wireless are in talks to pick up all of PSINet's remaining operations.

      It's important to note that bandwidth in Canada is tightly regulated by the government (CRTC). This means that bandwidth is dirt cheap compared to the US. It's actually almost the same price before the 1:1.5 conversion!!

      I think in the medium to long run, what we'll be seeing is these companies moving hosting operations to Canada in order to take advantage of this cheap bandwidth, or possibly newcommers setting up shop to satisfy the newly created demand once these companies go under.

    10. Re:infrastructure protection by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      RE: Does anybody know how close these troubled companies are to shutting down?

      James Cramer of TheStreet.com expresses much the same frustration... the execs at the company say one thing, and do another. Here's a recent article related to Exodus' "surprise" shutdown:

      Lessons from the Flight out of Exodus

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    11. Re:infrastructure protection by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      Having worked there in the recent past, I can say that Q can also be compared to the other big ISPs in terms of overbuilding for a 'new economy' boom that didn't last. They *loved* throwing hardware at any and all issues and projects. And, like many of these other companies, Q has laid off or will lay off many of the people that were previously required to run these networks and CyberCenters. I'd ask any such provider "What staff do you have behind the big glass doors, and will they be there next week?"

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    12. Re:infrastructure protection by tshak · · Score: 2

      The securty expenses like bulletproof glass, and especially biometric security, probably don't add up to all that much relative to the size of the business. Besides the marketing advantage that everyone taunts it for, I believe they are necessary. I live 20minutes from MSN's biggest Co-lo, which is about 50% of a 3 story Exodus building. If I'm a terrorist and want to disrupt the economny, I can take out over 1/3rd of MSN, plus tons of other companies lifeblood with a bomb or a few armed men. But with 500 pound doors, that's not going to happen.


      When is the last time you heard about someone storming into a datacenter and stealing, for example, one of Best Buy's Web servers?


      How ignorant! You've never heard about the sabatoge because the physicall security is too high. It's easier to penetrate the systems from a network level. If they had lax security it'd be easier to bust in and rip their servers out. I can't believe you got modded +4.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  25. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    despite bullet proof glass , kiddies own half those servers i'm guessing.

  26. Really, not the end of the world. by WasterDave · · Score: 2

    Not the end of the world for Exodus I mean. Obviously it isn't the end of the world for everyone else.

    IIRC Exodus have fourty something hosting facilities, presumably mostly empty right now, but they do have a lot of work and an excellent reputation. They'll be fine, they just need to downscale by a factor of, like, five. This, and the refinancing by GE, are just a part of that process.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  27. Is it time to move ? by JohnHegarty · · Score: 0

    Is it time to move sites away , to other suppliers. Or do people think they will survive this trobule ?

  28. Since slashdot is there? by rw2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Exodus is still operating, and hopefully will be able to keep the LEDs turned on for a good long while (since Slashdot is hosted there)

    So since slashdot is there they should be able to keep the lights on for a long time?

    Ah the wonders of English.

    On the serious side, can anyone tell me how these places manage to lose so much money? Is it the labor, site or networking costs? It seems like web hosting should be an industry that, once you climb to the scale of Exodus, is really really profitable.

    1. Re:Since slashdot is there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was the subsidised candy. :) They've jacked the prices up to normal now but it was damn cool getting my mountaindew and a packet of m&ms for 25 cents each.

    2. Re:Since slashdot is there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the POWER cost. Exodus consumed more then 75% of ALL the electrical power of Santa Clara. Imagine what their power bill is.... TRUE they have emergency generators aplenty.... and THEY also cost to operate.

  29. No more "first post" by garoush · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...is not the same as hanging up a big "closed" sign -- Exodus is still operating, ...for a good long while (since Slashdot is hosted there)."

    Oh great, I see it coming. Very soon, everyone at /. is going to post in the hopes of being the Last Post.

    For once we finaly have an opportunity to out-post those First-Posters clones.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  30. Above.net by Ando[evilmedic] · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know that two days ago all my packets headed to ICQ's (aol's) servers were hopping to Above.Net, and then just dieing.
    I had never seen that name before until then, and seeing that they may be going broke very soon is kinda interesting.

  31. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by DragonWyatt · · Score: 1

    It's estimated that as many as one-third of all Internet clicks pass through Exodus servers. In a real sense what's behind that 500-pound door is, well, the Internet. [emphasis mine]

    And they're still filing for bankruptcy. Go figure... Crappy business plan, anyone? I guess it really is a re-org.

    --
    Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
  32. seemed a little ostentatious by Sonic-B-PHuCT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to do some work for clients who had their systems at exodus and I found that it all seemed a little over the top. I've never understood why a datacenter needs 12 confrence rooms (or any for that matter... it's an OutSourced Datacenter, not a Marriot), bullet proof glass in the lobby, redundancy beyond reason - generators with enough fuel and power to run for 120 days at FULL load???? If the power is down for 6 months, chances are there's more important things to deal with than your website.
    Also, when I was shopping around for my own hoster, Exodus (while _extremely_ nice) didn't even bother trying to price within a budget. It was if they had been so used to getting blind VC money, that they didn't even understand the phrase, "I can't afford that." I don't know, just my opinion....

    1. Re:seemed a little ostentatious by Mad+Browser · · Score: 1

      We found our negotiations with them quite pleasant... Granted, this was somewhat recently, but they were by far the cheapest provider of their caliber that we could find!

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    2. Re:seemed a little ostentatious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, when I was shopping around for my own hoster, Exodus (while _extremely_ nice) didn't even bother trying to price within a budget. It was if they had been so used to getting blind VC money, that they didn't even understand the phrase, "I can't afford that." I don't know, just my opinion...."
      I had the same experience last week. I went to a restraunt and the price for a single hamburger was $16.00!!!! It was like they were so used to suckers paying that they didn't understand that I could go to Burger King and get a $1.49 TRIPLE cheeseburger! When I told them I could afford their meal, they kicked me out! How rude!

  33. Die! Exodus, Die! by phillippaxton · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's about time. Exodus and some of the other cited services (above.net) are some of the biggest spamhauses on the 'net. Now if some of the other spamhaus supporters (e.g., genuity.com) would die the 'net would have a LOT less spam!

    1. Re:Die! Exodus, Die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when? Exodus was downright aggressive against spam last time I checked (although I think they've slacked some since the last round of layoffs). We would get notice from them to shutdown a spamvertized site within a couple hours of the first complaint.

    2. Re:Die! Exodus, Die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn I wish I had mod points. That was no troll, it was the truth.

  34. Go to a Privately held Data Center, we did ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Great place FiberCloud.com

    Great People, Great Service, no STOOPID bursting policies (cough Exodus cough).

    The place is like Exodus, trick hardware, trick eye ball scanner security, big fat pipes to the Net.

  35. CEO Krause On Ch. 11 by jlttb · · Score: 3, Informative

    CRN reports on CEO William Krause's (CEO for a month) conference call. "The action we took yesterday has given us the protection we need to restructure our debts and proceed on much more stable footing than before, and if you felt secure doing business with Exodus six months ago, you should feel even more secure today."

  36. So Who is Left by brrrrrr · · Score: 1

    Which Hosting Centre with Global Reach is left after so many went the way of the dodo - PSINet sang the same tune a while ago "our European operations are not affected" (read "if you want to buy our European operations you can do so with little debt cos' the US operation takes it all in)

    The only names I can come up with right now are:

    - UUNet
    - NTT/Verio
    - C&W
    - ????

    Cheers,
    brrrrrr

    --
    brrrrrr it's cold
    1. Re:So Who is Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guy who works for C&W in germany said that since weeks he hasn't aquired a single new customer, his job now solely consists of laying off employees. They moved into a huge borg building in 2000 with monstous amounts of space, power and security. I guess that will get them into trouble now, too.

    2. Re:So Who is Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well there is also Above.net, after Exit-us, they are the big one that is left

    3. Re:So Who is Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How abouit adding SAVVIS in front of C&W?

    4. Re:So Who is Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digex. Facilities in DC area, California, and the U.K.

  37. About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Zeio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have worked for several companies that host at Exodus, and I have never need such disregard for fiduciary responsibility in my life. Most of the Exodus centers in and about the Santa Clara area, and there are many, many of which I have visited all tell the same story.

    This story was capacity that was build on expectation values attained from an unrealistic market. The bigger companies knew this, but the feeding frenzy was not abated even in light of its fiscal mindlessness.

    Why not wait to expand until you are bursting at the seams, having problems accepting new customers? Most people at Exodus cheap out anyway, I know a few personally that only buy non burstable 1mbit. Yet they built an infrastructure such that every cage could get an OC3 worth of bandwidth.

    I was in awe when my company got us a 6509, a 7206 and a 7507. We got this stuff used and it cost us a mint. I cant believe what Exodus did, the bought miles of $200,000 routers, switches and other things, miles of giant Liebert batteries, huge air conditioners, diesel power generators, hired the most moronic and incapable security guards on the planet, and bought these hand scanners that never - ever - seem to work right.

    At Digital Island, much is the same. The lease on all the equipment must be in the millions per month. The sad thing is that most of the carrier technology will probably change before the lease is up on a lot of the stuff.

    My suggestion to businesses: Never expect anything - Only expand to meet demand. If you are constantly "full," you can charge a premium rather than build a football field worth or colocation space for 10 customers.

    I have seen a few co location centers pop up recently; they are more intelligent in design. They don't wire in bandwidth until its needed, they don't buy equipment until its needed (and the BUY it), they have a building which is neat, like Exodus, but isn't extravagant, I mean, they make all the Exodus co-locations look like clean rooms at NASA or Intel.

    Co-location recipe: 1) Cheap warehouse in area close to a few OC-12 central offices. Make place look like Costco with lower roof. Add a few miles of Chatsworth ladder track. Buy routers per every some number of people that reaches three quarters capacity, avoid fiber to the cage until customers actually need it. Hire good people. Don't over invest in lame hand scanners that do work. (If every cage is locked, what would a person do in there anyway? Pull power cords from the mesh? And do this without getting caught?). Peer with a few carriers and scale up when needed. Most bandwidth is idle most of the time, bragging about OC-48 interconnects isn't cool, its useless.

    My current place of Employment was trying to get on Exodus's price list with our technology. The concept was to pay Exodus $50,000, the "verify" our product, then they will resell it.

    We laughed and moved on, knowing full well they were trying to squeeze for revenue - and we didn't need the endorsement of a dying behemoth.

    With Chapter 11, maybe Exodus will need to get smart. It has to now shift from building big, inefficient farms to having to farm the land you have properly to produce revenue.

    I wish Exodus the best of luck, and stop thinking you are AT&T or some such. Exodus is an overpriced co-location center with unresponsive technical support and too many dead weight employees.

    (One of the employees was shocked to find out we didn't have Visio 2000 installed, and he could not give the diagrams to me in JPG or PNG or PDF or some other useful format. I kept getting VSD files. I asked for a network diagram in xfig or something that we can use, and still, a blank stare)

    Interesting.

    --
    Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    1. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Thats sad considering you can export a Visio diagram in TIFF or something :)

      Jeremy

    2. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by essell · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget. Last time I visited one of the facilities, there were hundreds of empty desks; all of them stocked with Aeron chairs.

      Ooops, I just violated the Exodus NDA. Sorry.

      --
      i swear my userid used to be lower.
    3. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      "I asked for a network diagram in xfig or something that we can use, and still, a blank stare"

      Oh please, you are using program unknown to 99% people who deal with diagrams and you are wondering why he gave you a blank stare.

    4. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a former Global Center and Global Crossing employee. I went Global Crossing after the Exodus sale, and then jumped off of Global Crossing some time later. I have to agree with this statement. Exodus, as well as Global Center, has a whole bunch of dead weight employees. Global Crossing too (especially provisioning and the IEs, who implement and engineer NOTHING). They need to start looking at their own employees, at those available on the market, getting the good people that are available and letting go the bad.

      Global Center had some TAMs and engineers that were really stupid and NEED to get fired. All the while, they have some people in the NOC that are DYING to get a chance to show that they really know their stuff -- better than some of the engineers.

      And I do wish Exodus the best of luck. They NEED to get their act together and start thinking profit. Kill the stupid employees. You can get just one or two that can automate the job of dozens. So DO IT!

      The funny thing about some of the employees that are getting canned is that part of the sale deal that Globalcrossing made to Exodus is that they (GX) would pay severance if it was necessary to fire employees. I know one guy who went Exodus, was making $80K per year, and just got a years worth of severance pay. Least to say, he was BEGGING to be fired! heh.

    5. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xfig is a piece of crap by the way. do you realize how dumb YOU look by demanding diagrams in "xfig" format?

    6. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Zeio · · Score: 1

      Clarification to my original post.

      I do not do diagrams, and pretty much don't care about them in this context. While I realize VISIO is the standard, its not free, and we aren't going to go buy Visio to look at a diagram - its not cheap. We don't use Windows here, period.

      I just wanted some other format I could use.

      xfig was amongst several other requests, JPG, PNG, BMP, TIF, PDF, anything.

      Given that xfig is less featured that Visio, does not make it useless, and the price is right.

      We do have diagrams here, they are high level. I don't need a picture of a switch to understand what one rectangle is vs. another. For huge companies, such tools are probably necessary, but to refuse or be unable to export the drawing to something universally viewable is unacceptable incompetency.

      Stop focusing in on something that was less than 1% of the text of the original post. AC losers.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    7. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by bodhimindspirit · · Score: 1

      My company uses an Exodus facility (Boston 2) to host its web servers. By the way, their lounge has a really cool coffee/tea/cocoa machine, that I still get a kick of whenever I need to visit the IDC.

      When we moved our equipment in to the facility last year, it was completely full, and they were in the process of opening a new IDC in the Boston area and had sold out all its real estate before it was completed. It was my impression at the time that they couldn't build data centers fast enough to keep up with the demand -- and this was after the March 2000 stock correction in the tech sector. At the time, their prospects looked terrific, as they were still expanding as the general industry trend was in decline. When I was back in our company's cage last month, there was a stark difference in IDC population, although there was a greatly expanded Storage Networks implementation, and new tenants were still moving in.

      At any rate, one major issue that I heard about regarding Exodus was that the interest on their debt was larger than their income. One component of their strategy seemed to be 'build out as fast as you can regardless of the cost'. As a result, they now own and run the majority of the data centers in the world, and also have a tremendous debt. Chapter 11 forgives a large portion of that debt (if the proceedings go smoothly, granted, they might not).

      Given that Exodus actually has a non-trivial number of customers, is still gaining customers more quickly than it loses them, could realize relief from a significant portion of their debt, has tangible physical assets (more than a failing .com), and has new leadership (L. William Krause, with an excellent track record of bringing companies to profitability), I'm not so sure that they're going to bottom out yet. I do like the company; even through their recent layoffs and restructuring our service through them has continued to be excellent.

      Stuff to think about.

    8. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have obviously never seriously used xfig before. xfig, when used properly, is one of the most powerful diagram applications available. I'll grant you that the Athena Widgets look like ass, but xfig's feature set is solid and complete (definately competes with several commercial products for Windows). For example, combine with LaTeX and you can create concise free-body diagrams with beautiful equations embedded in them.

    9. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Skapare · · Score: 2

      I use Linux and BSD almost exclusively. Occaisionally I will use Windows. One of the reasons for using Windows is VISIO. It accounts for over half of my Windows time (which is not a whole lot, and the Windows drive in its little sled sits in a drawer most of the time). Xfig is, unfortunately, essentially worthless. And it's not about the pictures. It's about things like the ability to modify the drawings in a fully connected object oriented way. Xfig can't cut it. Since you don't do drawings, this is probably why you don't know. Maybe you should try and see if it works under VMWARE. I'm all for free software, but there's nothing in the free realm that comes close to the usefulness ov VISIO. I wish there was an alternative w/o having to buy an even more expensive CAD program.

      VISIO can export to a number of formats like BMP and GIF. You lose a lot in the export, but if all you know is Xfig, it's probably not much you've seen before. Next time, ask anyone sending you a drawing to export it from VISIO into an image format like BMP or GIF.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    10. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the hand scanners were a hoot. Our sales rep couldn't get them to work and he had to page the guard to let us in.

    11. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by Zeio · · Score: 1

      I don't do drawings, our network here is complex, but it is by no means an enterprise. Xfig cuts it for us here - its all we need. I'm not an OSS lunatic that is trying to convert Visio people to Xfig, I would never suggest such a thing.

      I just couldn't believe the fool couldn't export.

      I did end up installing NT on this box in vmware and put a pirate copy of Visio on it, 2000.SR1 and I got what I needed. Had I bought Visio and vmware, this would have cost a whole lot more.

      Again, I just asked for the diagram, which is so simple even Xfig or some other cheesy diagrammer could easily do, in a format which is readable by people without Visio.

      Had the employee at Exodus known how to use Visio "for real" he would have been able to do this.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    12. Re:About Exodus and why its Chapter 11 time. by chiph · · Score: 1

      My old company is/was hosted at Exodus, and we were leasing our equipment (Compaq servers and Cisco network gear) from them. I wonder how many other firms are leasing their hardware? And.. what happens when the leasing company (dot-bomb) goes belly-up -- Is there an Exodus warehouse somewhere full of previously leased hardware?

      Maybe the secondary market will be seeing a flood of freshly used hardware. Man, if I were starting a company now, I'd jump all over the chance to get top-notch hardware at fire-sale prices. Buy a Sun Enterprise 10000 for the low-low price of $50,000! No credit, bad credit, no problem!

  38. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by sulli · · Score: 2
    but the unassuming facade, which is wrapped in bulletproof Kevlar, belies its extremely high security, almost to the point of paranoia. Inside, a biometric hand scanner, another layer of bulletproof glass, two Pinkerton security guards, and a 500-pound door block access to 66,000 climate-controlled square feet of Internet servers...

    No wonder they're bankrupt! All that fancy hardware, really just for PR.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  39. What a shame. by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

    A year ago, they didn't have enough space. Now they have plenty. I hope they can survive this, as they really do a great job. They route a TON of traffic, and this would really disrupt quite a large number of people. Anyone else here ever spend hours on end in the ice cold Waltham IDC?

    --


    Um, this is my sig.
    1. Re:What a shame. by humanasset · · Score: 1

      I was in there yesterday. Everything was just the same as it was two weeks ago.

  40. my rejected ask slashdot from yesterday... by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1
    I submitted this story yesterday, but via Ask Slashdot. I am curious to see what companies are doing these days as protection from the side-effects of dotcom fallout such as this. I know of a few co-location providers that have disappeared over the past couple years and wanted to know what steps people were taking to make sure that their data is up and running, even when the company that's storing their data is having financial difficulties and/or is closing down? How does one gauge the reliability of co-los?

    (My previous company used Exodus and went through a long decision-making process to pick them. Now what? - I understand that they'll stay "in business" but what if?)

    funny that in the middle of trying to post this, /. (hosted by exodus) becomes temporarily unavailable.....

    1. Re:my rejected ask slashdot from yesterday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I know of a few co-location providers that have disappeared over the past couple years and wanted to know what steps people were taking to make sure that their data is up and running..."

      Well we started by having dual Co-Location presences with two major world-class providers, Exodus and AboveNet... Doh!

  41. random bible reference by 3prong · · Score: 2


    And lo, Moses said, "Let my people go."

  42. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

    "crappy business plan"?? No! Just dotcom fallout! When I walked through there, it was INSANE the size of the cages for certain dotcoms. The whole friggin place was a dotcom castle. They charged a crapload of money and still got business. I mean, what are you going to do when your business is going great, and then the market crashes/goes back to normal, and all your customers die? How can you make a business plan that protects you from your customers and still make money?

  43. I guess this means by mrsmalkav · · Score: 3, Funny

    that if Exodus starts selling some of their real estate, my living-in-a-colo dream will come true! Screw that living in a wired warehouse crap. I want my building to be ON the backbone and protected from the strongest earthquakes and bomb attacks, et al. Yeah! I'll be l33t!

    I swear, every time I went there and saw all the space that they were preparing during their expansions - I just wanted to grab a skateboard or some blades and just ride around. Either that or an office chair :) Ohhh the raised floors were smooooth and the room was so biiiig. *sigh*

    1. Re:I guess this means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. Slashdot may be Moving... by jfroot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I was just up in Vancouver visiting a managed hosting company called Roundheaven Communications. While I was signing in to receive my visitor pass I noticed the three individuals signed in before me marked their company down as Slashdot. I could not make out the names however because they were more or less unreadable.

  45. They have only themselves to blame... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry that Exodus's iminent demise/re-org/whatever is probably going to put a bunch of people on the street, job-wise.

    I'm not sorry that one of the biggest havens for spammers on the face of the 'net is about to go flooey. I've got huge chunks of Exodus IP space in my domain's local 'Deny' list due to Exodus doing bupkis about their spammy customers. I wonder if I will soon be able to clean some of that out...?

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  46. I am an owner of Exodus... by ZaBu911 · · Score: 1

    I've seen it go from 64$ to 14 cents a share. My two cents? Down the drain. ;p

  47. An alternative for slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internap has colo space and excellent connectivity.

    1. Re:An alternative for slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just buy internet connectivity from larger carriers, so you'd be better off just going straight to Sprint, UUNet or the such.

    2. Re:An alternative for slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get the same level of connectivity as Internap (I'm talking about quality and redundancy here) you'd have to buy straight from Sprint, UUnet, Genuity, Verio, and all the rest that Internap connects to.

      Or you could just buy one pipe from Internap for a much cheaper price than the above and get your routing optimized to boot.

      If you're not serious about a high level of service and quality, you may as well do just what you're suggesting.

  48. Old News by cataract · · Score: 1

    I posted this to /. two days ago and it was rejected. Jerks. They host Yahoo, eBay and Battle.net as well. Oh, to whoever's left playing Anarchy Online: yup, Exodus as well.

  49. Chapter 11 by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
    Note that filing for protection from creditors while reorganizing is not the same as hanging up a big "closed" sign...
    Technically, correct. But so were similar statements regarding Metricom (Richochet) and a host of other circling floatsam around the drain of the new economy.
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  50. Not exactly... by mindstrm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    TCP is designed to deal with loss, yes, but only loss due to congestion. When it encounters loss, it backs off. The problem is, if you get loss due to some other reason, like radio noise or a faulty unit, where congestion isn't the cause, tcp will just keep slowing down trying to fix the problem, when in fact, the best solution would be to just keep retrying without changing parameters.

    UDP, on the other hand.. just means they didn't want to rely on TCP's flow control. UDP does have error checking; there is a checksum in the IP header.
    It doesn't mean there is necessarily no error chekcing or retransmission.. it just means they did it their own way. OF course, I have no idea how the Everquest protocol actually works...

  51. We have hosted with Exodus for over two years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Forgive the anonymous bit, you'll understand why in a moment.

    We've hosted with Exodus for over two years. We're on the same contract we started with and have been using five times our bandwidth for half that time. We're still billed for our original amount! We should be paying tens of thousands of dollars more per month.

    Seeing some of the other posts here that are similiar, it's no surprise they are in trouble. They expanded too quickly but I think they should do okay in Chapter 11.

    Aside from the billing issue (which was fine with us) we have had awesome experiences with them.

    (DISCLAIMER: I own stock in EXDS)

    1. Re:We have hosted with Exodus for over two years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been lucky. They've been trying to bill us for tens of thousands of dollars of bandwidth we *didn't* use. Their own stats backs us up on this but billing is still trying.

      But, like you, aside from billing we've had no problems with 'em.

  52. Does anyone proof read what they write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Albeit a bit expected, it is shocking to find that Exodus Communications has gone ahead and filed for bankruptcy.

    Let's see, it's a bit expected, yet shocking? Is there anyone out there that still holds a decent command of written language?

  53. a comment on their support by petong · · Score: 1

    I worked for a company that had 2 racks there. We moved all of our equipment from exodus to above.net, and every several months we would get a frantic call from exodus saying our machines were down! This happened half a dozen times, and each time we told them we had moved our boxes, and followed up with an email. The first time it happened it was funny, the next few times it was a little ridiculous.

    1. Re:a comment on their support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exodus lost 2 of our (fully loaded) Sun E4500s from their loading dock. We argued for a while, and they ended up coughing up approx $500k when they couldn't find security tapes of the crime. I was amazed they didn't have insurance. Apparently the security manager had quit and left town a few weeks before. Guess he created his own severance package...

      It's not too surprising to me that they are on the rocks.

    2. Re:a comment on their support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The security cameras worked very very rarely.

      The fire suppression systems aren't live for the most part.

      The security guards can barely manage to chew their own gum.

  54. Don't buy the stock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Note: I am posting this AC because quite a few Exodus employees know my /. account name.

    Exodus is screwed. They have been losing customers at an alarming rate for a variety of reasons, including:
    - The dotcom collapse. Exodus spent a fortune on these customers, many of whom never paid them a cent.
    - Customers that left due to dissatisfaction. This includes even Hotmail, who left Exodus because, well, they suck.
    - Incompetence. While Exodus had some incredible employees, they also had a LOT of terrible ones, a huge factor in the horrible network problems that Exodus customers have.
    -The GlobalCenter buyout. Exodus bought GlobalCenter from Global Crossing. After the merger Exodus pissed of numerous customers with their poor service, resulting in the loss of such big name clients as Verisign and Google.

    I have had some good talks with some important people at Exodus, and that company is SCREWED. Most of their datacenters are at least half empty, and many of the ones they built in 2000-2001 never had a single customer. If anyone is thinking about buying Exodus stock at low, low prices, DON'T.

    1. Re:Don't buy the stock! by shri · · Score: 2

      Some times I'm amazed with the whole theory.. "people / companies who're in debt can easily get more money".

      I run a smallish website which does a few million pageviews a month, and more than breaks even. Yet, I've never had a hosting provider who did not ask for my credit card or payment upfront. Am I just stupid? (Ok.. lets not answer that question.)

    2. Re:Don't buy the stock! by Mr.Phil · · Score: 1

      companies usually don't ask for a credit card number on a company that's going to do in excess of $100,000 of hosting with them. It's just concidered poor taste.

  55. It's called Risk Management. by mindstrm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your website is important to your business, and is hosted somewhere, then by definition, the financial stability of that 'somewhere' is something you have to pay attention to.

    Just as with manufacturing, where not only do you source your parts, but you find a second-source for them as well, and also verify that THOSE sources are not using the same supplier... etc, etc. You find two sources that are as independent as possible, even going out to making sure the raw materials are coming from different parts of the world. Why? So a disaster somewhere along the line doesn't stop your business.
    Running a website is no different. You need to be able to move to a new location, or even have a second location set up already, in case of a problem.

  56. Getting Stuff... by Bartlet · · Score: 1

    How does one get a hand on the equipment after a company goes bust? I realize that it all ends up in an auction yard at some point and that most of the equip. at Exodus is not owned by Exodus and therefore will not be found at the swap meet anytime soon. However, the question is still valid. Where are the deals in used equipment?

    1. Re:Getting Stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My best advice to you is to get a job there before they go bust, and help yourself. (See story earlier this week.)

      The best deal in town on used gear is the self service five finger plan.

      THANKS FOR THE GEAR EXODUS!

    2. Re:Getting Stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a great story floating around the internal EXDS employee chat channels about a US NOC (Network Operations Centre) chap/ette who was given their redundancy and the offer of gardening leave which they elected to take....... as they left the building so did a Cisco 10700 series router.... Wonder if it is any help with watering the lawn? >Eliza

  57. mod this up its funny!!! by t0qer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    mod this up its funny

    so is this...
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: PLEASE DON'T USE SO MANY CAPS. USING CAPS IS LIKE YELLING!

  58. Why these companies lose money by alienmole · · Score: 2
    On the serious side, can anyone tell me how these places manage to lose so much money? Is it the labor, site or networking costs? It seems like web hosting should be an industry that, once you climb to the scale of Exodus, is really really profitable.

    They lose money because they spent huge amounts of money to "build capacity" during the dot-com boom. That included buying up other hosting providers. Now many of their customers are gone, they have enormous excess capacity, and they can't service their debt load.

    The fact that while money was easy, they wasted it horribly also doesn't help. The businesses that succeed are the ones that plan for the downturn, even as they are building capacity, rather than spending as if there's no tomorrow.

    During the dot-com boom, the conventional wisdom (which, as is often the case, was actually foolishness) was that you had to spend big to gain market share to survive the coming shakeout. That's a little different from planning for a downturn: it's planning to be the biggest when the downturn comes.

    It's like a game of chicken, where companies compete on how ludicrously they can overspend. In this environment, it's easy to lose sight of why you're spending the money, and get carried away. Strategic thinking is replaced by keeping-up-with-the-Amazons.

    How else could the Aeron chair fad be explained??? :)

  59. Verio by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    My company has used Verio (formerly Digital Nation) for over two years. Service as been top notch and they have more bandwidth than we'd ever need. At out peak, we were pumping out a continous 62 megabits/second and our ping times never grew a millisecond. Their prices are lower than most of their competition and they're fast acting (every departman that is aside from billing -- billing will try to screw you by continuing to bill you for some service you changed or deleted months ago... so watch your statements).

    Verio rocks.

  60. genius! by alienmole · · Score: 4, Funny
    that if Exodus starts selling some of their real estate, my living-in-a-colo dream will come true! Screw that living in a wired warehouse crap. I want my building to be ON the backbone and protected from the strongest earthquakes and bomb attacks, et al. Yeah! I'll be l33t!

    You realize you've just given either Neal Stephenson or William Gibson the framework for their next novel.

    I can see it now, Hiro Protagonist will move from his U-Stor-It to the nearest Exodus IDC...

    1. Re:genius! by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

      Exactly. But see, the problem w/ the difference between a living-in-a-colo dream vs the living-in-a-box-with-phatpipe is that it's not a cramped box filled with gear. I have always been inspired by Hiro and by Invisigoth ;) but they have small box-homes...

      my place would just be palatial. and enviro-controlled :D

  61. Got Spammers? Protect them? Bankruptcy results. by strredwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    Rob? Better look for a new provider! Exodus has been a spamhaven for some time. Here's the scoop: Spamhaus.org ROSKO entry, with full list of spammers and their spam, replies, etc.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  62. Scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some selected providers:
    Navisite: market cap $13 million
    Globix: market cap $26 million
    Exodus: market cap $95 million
    SAVVIS: market cap $67 million
    ....
    So, for a couple days of profit Microsoft could buy them all of them.

  63. Sunguard is all over the place by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    We use SUNGUARD services for mainframe data storage. God help us if we ever actually need that data in an emergency :(

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  64. Scary IDEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nor would they need all these addition terrorist security laws. If the ran all the traffic they could build a snoop clause right into the contract.

    1. Re:Scary IDEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could hold all the encryption keys too. you would send your message to them. they would decrypt it with their copy of your key then reencrypt it with their copy of the recipient's key.

  65. Battle.net not on Exodus any longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject: Re: Does Exodus bankruptcy mean Battle.Net gone?
    From: GFraizer (Shlonglor)
    Host: Blizzard Entertainment
    Date: Wed Sep 26 12:41:44

    On Wed Sep 26 12:35:29, Wondering wrote:
    > I heard the Exodus server hosting company has filed for bankruptcy.
    > Does that mean that Battle.Net will be going away, since Battle.Net
    > is hosted by Exodus?

    Exodus is no longer a Battle.net hosting partner.

    Shlonglor

  66. Sealand is nice by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    and CHILLY this time of year but their business seems to be on solid footing (pun intended)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  67. Non-paying customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know abovenet has at least one customer, Aimster, who owes them ~$500,000. It's customers like that that cause these ISPs to tank. The thing I don't understand is why the ISPs just don't cut these customers off as soon as they're past due, especially in this time when most of their customers are themselves failing.

  68. Vendor 4 by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think we do business with that guy. He's always flaming us...

  69. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by cjsnell · · Score: 3, Funny


    The kevlar fronting and bulletproof glass is for when their investors come-a-calling.

  70. So the customers will go to ... ? by Sagarian · · Score: 1

    Scary to think of a company of tens of thousands of employees whose name is the complete sentence : "I B.M."

    Anyway I guess another hosting company will inevitably be seeing an inflow of customers from the "Exodus exodus" : Inflow

  71. Umm...Maybe RAISE prices, CUT costs??? by bartwol · · Score: 1

    ...you fool.

    <bart

  72. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kiddies can't AFFORD Exodus.... They're usually still operating sites out of their parents' basement...

  73. You can all recognize me by PD · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'll be the one dancing, cheering, and urinating on the grave of Exodus. Those cocksuckers there filled my e-mail box with so much spam that my only reaction to this story about their misfortune is great happiness.

    So to Exodus, those mega-whoring spam bitches, I say GOOD BY AND GOOD RIDDANCE.

    Yes, I know this is flamebait, but it feels real good.

  74. In defense of web hosting houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a former GlobalCenter employee. Fortunatley I left the company before Exodus bought them off Global Crossing. I had worked for Global Center for about 2 years previously. I watched the data center I worked in grow from one suite to half the building it was in, to the entire building it was in, to adding 180,000 sq. feet down the street.

    Every time the company grew it was because the current space was either full or spoken for. In fact, while we were waiting for the 180,000 sq. feet to open we crammed cages in our existing building in places where we never would have before...next to AC units, around fire supression tanks, and even moved the NOC into the office to sell the space in the NOC.

    After we opened the 180,000 sq. feet the building began to fill up amid the rumors of an EXDS sale. Yet still everything seemed ok.

    The "buy, buy, buy" mentality really was justified. We had sold roughly 1/4 of the new 180,000 sq. feet 6 months before building completion. A building that large requires a _lot_ of network gear. A building that large requires a _lot_ of backup generator power. Many customers (especially financial type companies, of which GCTR hosted many) are very interested in bio-metric hand scanners, kevlar, etc.

    For quite a while there it seemed like we couldn't spend the money fast enough. But I don't think that's a problem suffered by the hosters alone. Every .com out that has gone bust is just as guilty as EXDS. We had foozball and pool tables, video games, and catered lunches. Just like every other .com out there. It was just the way that things were done.

    EXDS wasn't doomed by mismanagement, overspending, or anything else that people keep talking about. The problem is that a huge number of their customers went out of buisness themselves, and a majority of those couldn't pay their bills when they left. They expanded when they should have, but now they need to shrink.

    To stay alive EXDS should close a bunch of their empty data centers, sell off the extra gear, and use the money they make off that to keep operating. They do (or at least did) have a fairly decent number of large "name brand" customers who haven't gone out of buisness. That should help pay the bills for a while.

    1. Re:In defense of web hosting houses by Ragle+Gumm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but never forget that the catered lunches were only there to replace the beer keg. The beer keg that was rightfully ours!

      I still don't forgive Leo Hindery for that one. Although that con-call was one of the funniest things I experienced at GCTR.

      And I disagree with your assertion that overspending didn't destroy EXDS. Customer churn was half, but you can't ignore Mad Ellen's shopping spree. If EXDS had grown at a reasonable rate they'd be a lot better off. Hell, even buying GCTR was mismanagement and overspending.

      Serves them right for moving us to MS-Exchange I say!

    2. Re:In defense of web hosting houses by Elizaf · · Score: 1

      You say that you are a former GCTR employee (who isn't on this page, I am beginning to suspect??) but then you have all this inside knowledge of what is going on in the company...haah! To quote: "EXDS wasn't doomed by mismanagement, overspending, or anything else that people keep talking about." 'Scuse me if I wasn't working for another company and thinking it was EXDS! That was exactly the problem with EXDS, a CEO with a track record of not being able to gauge the IT future never mind the nose in front of her face, namely M (H)ellen 'the internet will never catch on' Hancock Perhaps that is the perception that you have been given but as someone who talked regularly with people who worked for EXDS on IRC ('lo all, 'cos I know you are all going to read this eventually :) there was a common heartfelt world-wide consensus that what exactly to blame was a top-heavy spending mad management structure headed up by (H)ellen and her cronies. A structure that when the crisis started to hit ended the subsidised vending machines and encouraged people to use less pens in company-wide mails (I wish I was joking!) instead of implementing country-by-country economic streamlining. I agree with you about the only possible solution for the predicament that Exds finds itself in now but please do not put anyone under any illusions about the causes of that same situation. Eliza

    3. Re:In defense of web hosting houses by Elizaf · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmmm, well I suppose there are a lot of EXDS/GCTR people past and present who would agree with you about the moving to Exchange I suppose.....probably just as well they had to lay off most of the IT roll-out team (imagine bringing engineers from CA to London to put on a ghost image of W2K on user machines ....... gaaaahhhhh!!!!) The roll-out team were due to implement an Active directory integrated network across their domain model. > My heart does go out to all the good people who are laid off in continual rolling redundancy drives. I was one of the first to go and was angry @ the time but an now in a good job and can observe the war-zone with an emotion mainly consisting of detachment. Eliza

    4. Re:In defense of web hosting houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a current Exodus associate (NO I was not part of Globalcenter). I am appalled by the things all of you "Globalcenter people" are posting!

      You are all a bunch of thieves and malcontents, and the world is a better place now that we've fired you all.

      We will be sucksessful in our restructuring, we will get more financing, and we will thrive. And no we will not hire any of you jerks back!

      Our way of business is better than yours was. You people didn't even have a proper email platform when we came in. Proserv didn't know NT at all. Good riddance I say.

      -- Just another proud Exodus MCSE, CCNA, A+ certified employee.

    5. Re:In defense of web hosting houses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Our way of business is better than yours was. You people didn't even have a proper email platform when we came in. Proserv didn't know NT at all. Good riddance I say.

      BULLSHIT! The GCTR method of buisness was great. We had teams of technical guys who were specialized, and assigned to customers who needed those skills. NT shops got MCSEs. Unix shops got Sun Certified folks. And the customers appreciated forming a relationship with a technical contact. That person learned their customer's sites inside and out, and more often than not were able to resolve issues without customer intervention. We had some messed up installations there, and our TAMs could handle them. (Vignette on NT, Satellite news feeds shared among several dozen Sun boxen, and 100+ server networks come to mind.)

      Why don't you ask some of the ex-GCTR customers who have dumped EXDS for other hosters why they left. You might be surprised by their answers.

      Oh, yeah. And Exchange is so much better than a distributed LDAP/Shell/Pop system. At least the GCTR way people who didn't use Microsoft products (and yes, we had a choice) had a way to get their mail. Who needs a choice anyway?!?

  75. EXODUS CUSTOMERS: CO-LO WITH ME by Snafoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    In my attractive one-bedroom flat.

    I have a DSL link!!
    x2 inbound bandwidth! Great for those sites that, er, you know, have lots of uploads and comments and stuff!

    ...Like Slashdot. CmdrTaco, bring me the servers. I'll set up IP_MASQ and we'll be up and running in no time. We'll show those bastards how to do hosting!

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:EXODUS CUSTOMERS: CO-LO WITH ME by Snafoo · · Score: 1

      You want security? I'll give you security!
      I have an attack cat. She's infallible! She likes saucers of milk! And boy cats! But we're getting that fixed! So just make sure your attackers don't bring boy cats!

      --
      - undoware.ca
  76. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by DragonWyatt · · Score: 1

    That's a good question; but companies like Sears and General Electric don't seem to have a problem.

    I saw a similar thing happen with another hosting company, Relera. They had awesome facilities. Problem is they were still building new ones in May of this year, even when 4 of their total 11 had zero (ZERO!) customers.

    Admittedly that's probably a bit different from Exodus' situation, even though Exodus was supposedly a major investor in Relera ;) .

    --
    Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
  77. IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM, one of the biggest in the world.

  78. this is funny? by jiheison · · Score: 1

    one t0q too many i'd say.

  79. This may be just what yahoo needs... by Lobsang · · Score: 1

    I believe yahoo is hosted at Exodus as well. I'm not really sure, but if that's the case, they may just buy Exodus and keep the infrastructure... Think about it... On these days of economic chaos, if you have a little bit of spare money in your pockets you can buy a lot for less.

    (I'm just wondering here if yahoo isn't in a similarly unpleasant situation...)

    1. Re:This may be just what yahoo needs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok its VERY clear you have NO clue what you are talking about!!! And NO yahoo is not going to get into the host/ISX business, why would yahoo take on something that is not profitable.

  80. Re:You can all recognize me, I've got SPAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm . . . maybe you shouldn't leave your email address in your profile if you don't like spam.

    Any robot in the world can harvest -

    pdrap@startrekmail.com
    pdrap@startrekmail.com
    pdrap@startrekmail.com

    - out of a post here, and you're blessed for life.

    Enjoy the influx of mail peanut brain.

    LONG LIVE EXODUS - ALL HAIL THE RESTRUCTURING!
    WE WILL STILL CRUSH OUR COMPETETITION!

    signed,

    Ellen's Love Slave.

    PS - We're just going to change our name and bounce right back. (After a few more bad checks of course! Shouts out to my boys Cisco and Liebert!)

  81. For those that are risk takers... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    Check out savvis. Top notch service and a faster network than exodous.

    If they stay in business I have no doubts that they'll soon be one of the largest players around.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:For those that are risk takers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If they stay in business..."

  82. Re:You can all recognize me, I've got SPAM! by PD · · Score: 2

    That address forwards to my other addresses.

    If I start getting too much spam on that address, I will just point it at uce@ftc.gov and go get another one.

    So, I don't really give a rats ass if the spammers get that address.

    Bet you didn't think of that, you retard.

  83. Clue meter's reading zero here. by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    Cool companies like Exodus staying in biz and providing competition and customer service == goooooooooooood.

    Cool companies like Exodus dying, getting bought out, and consolidated into the Benevolent People's Dictatorship of AOL/TimeWarner/Corpnamehere/Corpnamehere/Corpnameh ere , featuring high prices, low security, and low service == BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD.

    Let's recap. Goooooooooooooooooooooooood > BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD. I think we understand these concepts now, hmmm?

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
  84. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that he meant 0wN in terms of 'cracked', not own in terms of posession.

  85. Web farm building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was working for Global Center, they were still building their new 100k ^2 foot facility in Sunnyvale. It filled up as fast as they could keep the techs installing hardware and power.

    When you design a facility right, you put in an infrastructure to support a maxxed out facility.
    If you take over a warehouse to turn into a farm, you have to keep upgrading what you have. And that will never work out as well as a properly designed facility.

    Also remember that everything done at a datafarm is techincal and very expensive.

    I got out of Global Center before the end of last year, before the Exodus thing. All the perks of working there were gone by then anyway.

    Wonder if Exodus ever got enough power and airconditioning to supply Hotmail and Google?

  86. Berbee is good. by dangermen · · Score: 0

    Berbee is in good shape. Give them a look, www.berbee.com

  87. Re:Vendor 4? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is Vendor 4 supposed to be the Devil, or Bill Gates?
    Oh, wait, nevermind...

  88. Oh Come On by nihilogos · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'd love to see slashdot hosted on a 56K link out of Rob's bedroom.

    --
    :wq
  89. Profitable Colocation Centres? by BabbleFish · · Score: 1

    DataVaults.com (the little colo in Toronto that I own a piece of) is 85% full. We're profitable. This seems to be unique. Maybe Slashdot needs a new hosting provider :).

    I've thought for a long while that Toronto needs a few thousand ... maybe even 100,000 feet of colo, but Exodus (among others) built millions of feet. We even had "experts" tell us that we weren't players unless we built our own 100,000 feet.

    I'm beginning to think that the last man standing will win at this game.

  90. I'd hate to see that pretty cage go by Kostya · · Score: 2
    I hope Exodus stays open (I had a lot of clients collocate there, but then most of them are gone). I'd hate to see that pretty Andover/Slashdot cage go at Exodus in Waltham.

    Why the hell didn't VALinux take a shot of that and put it up somewhere? It was the best add for VALinux hardware I had ever seen. How many boxen is in that cage? 16 1Us? How many run slashdot? It was impressive to see in action. It was even more fun to surf slashdot during lulls--since I was 4 cages down working for the ill-fated Voter.com.



    I hope you guys have pictures to remember it by. But then, you might be sick of the cage (I got sick of mine pretty quick). They don't call 'em cages for nothing.

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  91. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

    GE diversifies like mad. They really have a major problem being hurt. Have you seen their list of the companies they own?

    But if you're talking about hosting services, GE owned or at least had a lot of stock in one of them that tanked. My understanding is that GE stuck it out until the bitter end and then had to move all their servers in one night to a new colo.

  92. Can you say "Exit Strategy"? by Wee · · Score: 2
    Exodus customers should find alternate hosting now. Not actually move servers now, just find someone that can give you assurances they will have rack space when Exodus starts closing down the less-used IDCs. (Seriously, have you been inside one of their IDCs lately? It's a ghost town...)

    S4R does hosting, colo, services, and has rack space in SBC's Irvine IDC. Inflow is also good (and in SoCal, if you need that), but I get a very Exodus-like feeling from them... more sizzle than steak, like they've bought too many Aeron chairs.

    Whatever happens, if you have a server in an Exodus rack, you should probably make plans.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Can you say "Exit Strategy"? by tshak · · Score: 2

      MSN hosts the vast majority of their network there (not to mention many other big names). I wouldn't be too worried.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:Can you say "Exit Strategy"? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Have you been inside ANY IDC lately? They're ALL ghost towns. The market for hosting and rackspace is severely oversaturated, a lot of these places are just going to have to shut down. I worked for an ISP that had stuff colo'ed at several different IDCs around town, not one of them had even 10% of the available space used. At one (InterNAP,) we were literally the only company hosting there. Our two cabinets were the only ones in use. Yet they still pay for a full staff and round the clock security.

      There's got to be a point when these places simply run out of cash, because there's no way most of these places are making any money. After the dot-com bust, all of the anticipated demand went away, thus leaving colo centers that were 50% full at 5% capacity. The investment was already made, but at some point you have to cut your losses and get a fat tax write off.

    3. Re:Can you say "Exit Strategy"? by Wee · · Score: 2
      Have you been inside ANY IDC lately?

      Yeah, just yesterday (Wednesday). It was about half full, and fuller since last I'd seen it (the week before).

      Go look up the Chapt 11 stuff on Exodus. They were smart, I'll give them that. Not one of their bandwidth providers is a creditor. But they are going to have to seriously restructure their physical assets. Have you ever MOVED running hardware to another IDC before? I have -- it sucks worse than anything I've ever known. But for customer types, it's just as easy to move to an IDC which stands a good chance of not making you move again in a year as to another one owned by the same company which is restructuring. You want stability over nearly all else in an IDC.

      When your IDC/colo makes you move, the sales/marketing guys start calling around to find a better deal. That's scary. For Exodus.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  93. Mark is gone - harvard net sold by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    Looks like the demons are no longer in the Building:

    The site is now named HarvardNet Sucked - note the past tense

    HarvardNet, after being sold to Allegiance Telecom in a somewhat questionable stock and cash deal, was renamed to hosting.com and made one of a family of data centers across the country. Most amusingly, the years-old (and pretty inaccurate) map of the Boston Data Center is still viewable on the hosting.com site. Apparently the people working on the site used what they had available, and not what was accurate. But here's the kicker:

    MARK IS GONE.
    Yep, out the door. It was painted as a "sabbatical" from the stresses of running the company. It was more likely a laundry trip from all the dirt stains he got running the company into the ground. But we're a little distanced from the whole process these days, what with nearly every spy we had in the company now on to greener pastures. It took a while for us to know that Mark had been ka-booted, and that's kind of sad; we should have been right there, hours after he left, to do some sort of dance or something on this site. But, you do what you can, right? So out he goes, with a rumored package deal to get him out of Allegiance's hair. That should go down well with all of you who were laid off in December, just in time for Christmas. Money for running HarvardNet (poorly), Money for selling HarvardNet (for running it poorly) and now money for leaving HarvardNet (after selling it and running it poorly).

    Now since it is run by a whole different company, different management, we should continue to condemn the situation?

    makes sense to me.

    or an obsolete hatred for people long gone

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  94. Hello? McFly? by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    "(DISCLAIMER: I own stock in EXDS)"

    If you have firsthand experience with their inability to bring in the money owed to them, why the HELL do you own their stock?

    Tell me it was a Christmas present, or something...

  95. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    W|-|4t 1s j00 T41|<1ng 4|30ut????!!!!!

    1f 1 OwnZ j00 |30><or 1T5 M1Ne f4g><0R!!!###

  96. Re:Who Now? Not IBM by brrrrrr · · Score: 1

    IBM would be a mistake, just ask youself what their core-business is ... its not hosting, so hosting is the first thing to go in a restructuring excersise (like Intel Online Services)

    just my 2ct

    --
    brrrrrr it's cold
  97. free candy and soda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I know is, up until a few months ago, candy and soda from the vending machines at Exodus was free to all customers. Then one day, they made everything cost $0.25 and I knew they were hurting.

    Ahh, well. They had a lot of fancy security, that in reality could have been easily bypassed by crawling under the floor panels which lift up.

    I just feel bad for even more people who have now lost their jobs while the rest of the country is too busy being hyped up for war that they don't even notice.

  98. Let's really be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chapter 11 protection just prevents the debtors from collecting while a company reorganizes.

    Priority for Exodus is reorganizing its debt. IDCs take a lot of time to plan and build. The last round that opened in 2000 were on the drawing board in 98.

    With the revenue that Exodus sees, it is highly unlikely that they will close. Downsizing and/or acquisition by IBM or EDS are likely outcomes.

  99. Bulletproof glass... by ckm · · Score: 2

    'course, what they fail to mention is that the hosting facility has floor to ceiling *normal* double paned windows *in the colo*.
    <P>
    At least, that's the way it is in Santa Clara... All that physical security is a joke, it's just to make the executives of client companies feel better.
    <P>
    They waste money in other interesting ways too, like with LCD windows that become transparent at the push of a button to reveal.... the colo....
    <P>
    That said, I hope they don't go bust, that would be a big, big problem.

    --
    -- I don't have a cool sig.
  100. Re:A note from an (another) employee by Elizaf · · Score: 1

    Yes the NOC were a great bunch of people but what this person fails to record was that the 'tender mercies' were supposed to be the educated guidance of the technical account managers (TAM's) and subsidised training which was never forthcoming under the GCTR or EXDS system of CRM. At least this was the case in London, obviously I cannot comment on the situation for the rest of the Datacentres only the one I had experience in. Eliza

  101. Why not exodus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they will still be in business.

  102. Benefits of Chapter 11? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the benefits of Chapter 11? How long can the Exodus keep going?

  103. A certain house near Redmond by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    You made me think what kind of people would live in Gates' house instead of him. Suppose he dies or can't afford it. Who would buy it? What for? Imagine it full of squatters.

    And by the way, would they find a sled named "Rosebud"?

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  104. I too used to work for Exodus ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and could see something coming which is why I jumped. At about the time of the second round of layoffs I decided to pull in a favour and went to a reseller I'd done a lot of business with. My reasons for jumping - I had the option of working for a company which had cash and was profitable rather than one which had debt and was losing money.

    My big gripe was that the guys (men and women) who earned commission on the deals they sold had no stake in the execution of that business. Once a customer had signed on the dotted line, the Account Executive took his/her commission, and moved on. If the project went pear shaped then there was no clawback, and there was every incentive for Salesmen to oversell the offering. There were times when we techies would get bollocked by the salesmen for telling customers the truth - they just wanted to offer whatever it took to clinch the deal and then run.

    Debt, debt, debt. EXDS had 17 consecutive quarters of double digit growth (not double digit annual growth, double digit *quarterly* growth), and the whole mentality was that of the frontier. What happened was that EXDS reached the West coast, and after several years of cherry picking they had to go back and win business on grounds other than "we're here and we're great". The skills needed to run a business once its marketplace is starting to mature are radically different to those of the frontier, and the *depth* just isn't there. Period.

    EXDS got big ideas when its shareprice was high, and it could pretend to be a big company. They were going to develop from being a Hosting company into an umbrella IT solutions provider. They crammed in technical people, many good, some iffy, with headcount rather than capability being the objective - they wanted to be BIG. But the basic controls were lacking, so you got stupid gotchas - a block pulling some structured cabling accidently undoing a power cord, and causing an outage on a live site. A HA cluster being modified by a third party backup solution company, and not being revalidated. Sure it happens anywhere, but it happened too often at EXDS

    EXDS were also the past masters of reneging on deals. Time and again they would "partner" with somebody, proclaim it to be the best thing since sliced bread, only to go behind the partner's back and make another partnership with a competitor. The deal makers thought this was really clever - in fact it was really dumb, and technical staff who'd worked making relationships with partners found the rug pulled from under their feet.

    It's too late now. Most of the good technical staff have jumped. The irony is that EXDS have a good offering for space/power/bandwidth, worth paying over the odds for. But the people who know what they're doing are so far removed from the business end that the organisation doesn't work. The staff turn over so fast at management levels that there's no maturity in the company. No ownership of issues. No single face to the customers (they get told to "phone the XYZ department"). It won't get better until somebody buys the company out and the entire culture changes and pretty much all the staff except the techies are changed. And then there needs to be some stability.

  105. Inflow by gte604j · · Score: 1

    carriers (uunet, genuity, att) that run into 3 different sides of the building, and if they ever reach 40% they bump up to OC-192. They manage money well, they only build there facility out more when the need arizes. The people are very friendly and very helpful. Besides that, for our company exodus just was too big business feeling and we wanted a company that understood that we were small and wanted us. If you absolutely have to say that your servers sit behind two layers of cinder blocks with a layer of kevlar in between, then please move your boxes their, else if you want almost fanatical service and unbeatable uptime look at inflow. I have to say since I moved our servers I have been extremely happy with Inflow, and we are extremely happy that we went with them instead of Exodus, and in the Atlanta area I know of a lot of large companies that are moving to Inflow from exodus

  106. HAL?! by lww · · Score: 1

    I see someone else has experience with IBM^H^H^H, er I mean HAL's sales reps

  107. Trading halted in EXDS by NASDAQ by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    If you go to NASDAQ.com, you will find that EXDS is halted as of 9/26, pending further news. At $0.17, not much room left between here and 0 anyway... may want to sell for a loss when you can. (JMHO)

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  108. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually most of the bullet proof glass, security guards, and kevlar are for insurance purposes. A large bank or large financial company needs curtain security in place to get the insurance they need. At least that's what a sales guy said on a tour of Boston2(where /. is). I walk by slashdot's cage every day and I don't think I've seen anyone in there yet.

  109. Re:Inflow, too (Tcker Smbl) by Elizaf · · Score: 1

    Ticker = EXDS Eliza

  110. Re:A note from an (another) employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were lucky - we got some training. But it wasn't just that it was listening to the customer, and doing what THEY (the customer) wanted. When I transitioned to Exodus, it was "Well you only handle the initial setup, and the firewall is set up by a different group, and the servers are set up by a different group." Give me a break - I'm supposed to explain to a customer that a multitude of people would work on their equipment, and nothing would really be coordinated.

    I like the GC mentality, Glad to hear that Exodus might be going to that, it might make it worthwhile to spend the oodles of money that Exodus charges for a cage, and the staff time.......

  111. Legal Question by Smirks · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that alot of companies are incorprated in the state of deleware, the company I work for included. Why choose deleware if their company's headquarters isn't even in the state?

    1. Re:Legal Question by The_Messenger · · Score: 0
      The incorporation procedure varies from state to state. Deleware makes it fast, inexpensive, and exceedingly easy to incorporate, and because you don't have to be based in a state to incorporate a business in it, many people choose Delaware. Other popular states are Nevada, California, New York, and Florida -- but Deleware is the best.

      Check out Delaware's incorporation page or a Google search for details.

      --

      --
      I like to watch.

  112. How to Pick the Winners from the Losers by Momonari+Junta · · Score: 1

    Easy. Follow the revenue.

    Who has long term prospects based on their relationships and alliances with customers? Those are the guys who are likely to survive. Over the long term, data center hosting is really fixed costs (it costs the same to run a data center whether you have 2 or 200 customers in there) so it all comes down to volume. My sense is that it will probably shake out to 2 major players; most likely Exodus and Verio.

    Full Disclaimer: I work for Exodus :)

    - Junta

  113. Re:Interesting piece about Exodus Hosting centres. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hint: traceroute ge.com.