Slashdot Mirror


Body Powered Batteries -- Thermoelectrics

An Anonymous Coward writes: "According to this story on Yahoo, the folks at Applied Digital Solutions have "developed a miniaturized thermoelectric generator -- a half-inch diameter ceramic-based `battery' that converts low gradient body heat flow into electrical power." Right now they can power watches or small medical devices. How long before these things can power my handheld?"

309 comments

  1. Just call me "Coppertop" by WinDoze · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the first step towards "The Matrix", I'm warning you!

    1. Re:Just call me "Coppertop" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow- they even invented a new unit of electrical current: the micron!

    2. Re:Just call me "Coppertop" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's better than Battlestar Galactica where the Centon was the unit of measure for everything.

    3. Re:Just call me "Coppertop" by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm sorry, but it has to be said: you can imagine a Beowulf cluster of these, because they made a film about it. ;-)

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    4. Re:Just call me "Coppertop" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL didn't take long for everybody to go "Wow! Sounds like the Matrix!"
      Everybody beat me to it :P

  2. how long... by motherfuckin_spork · · Score: 0, Funny
    until your car can be powered by an anal probe...

    --
    Nope, not me, I must be someone else...
  3. Better question. by jiheison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How soon before this technology is co-opted and run into the ground by manufacturers of existing energy technology?

    1. Re:Better question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean like solar, wind, and hydro power? We're acquiring the patents right now.

      There is no incentive for us to make this technology available to the public at this point in time. Remember 11 years ago, when Iraq's Hussein invaded Kuwait and NBC had all of those alternative energy commies on tv talking about the invasion being a good opportunity to explore other energy technology? We called up our main man in the White House, Bush (the spook, not the cokehead...), and enlisted his aid. That night when he addressed the nation and mentioned the "fight for democracy" with a straight face, I laughed so hard that Beluga caviar came out of my nose. He still uses that line every time we meet, whether at Davos or GOP fundraisers. It still gets to me. But I digress...

      Eleven years later and we still have the Arabian oil fields girdled with our destoyers. Soon a majority of cars on the road will be gas-guzzling SUVs. You can rest assured that oil is never going away. Oil. Oil oil oil oil. I can't get enough of that word.

      I admire your cynicism, son. Do you need a job?

      Love,
      The Energy Industry
  4. So where do you put it by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope it's not where I'm thinking, like how they used to take your temperature as a kid.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:So where do you put it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it is :)

  5. Can you imagine by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1, Funny

    powering a Beowulf cluster of anything?

    " Dance, you silly little freak, dance!"

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  6. yAH! by davey23sol · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now your sexual escapades can create REAL electricity.

    ha cha!
    (I doubt this comments applies to any of us...)

    --


    "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    1. Re:yAH! by sporty · · Score: 1

      Nono, you are thinking battery powered bodies ;)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:yAH! by blackbeaktux · · Score: 1

      >Now your sexual escapades can create REAL electricity.

      It adds a whole new meaning to the term "discharge" doesn't it?

    3. Re:yAH! by mutende · · Score: 1
      >Now your sexual escapades can create REAL electricity.
      It adds a whole new meaning to the term "discharge" doesn't it?

      It certainlay adds a whole new meaning to the term "beowulf cluster"...

      --
      Unselfish actions pay back better
    4. Re:yAH! by bgarcia · · Score: 1
      (I doubt this comments applies to any of us...)
      Yeah. I wouldn't wear one of those things either.
      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    5. Re:yAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (I doubt this comments applies to any of us...)


      I dunno about you, but I got laid saturday night, yesterday afternoon, and a great hand job last night. Spewed all over the place. And it was with a girl, too, that I didn't have to pay.

    6. Re:yAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I had a nasty GNU rash caused by a GPL virus.
      The doctor gave me some cream that cleared up those Beowulf clusters in about a week. Whatta relief!
      I'm glad I got rid of it before I stared to develp open source. eeeeeeew!

    7. Re:yAH! by DickPhallus · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! That's absolutely hilarious considering it was posted by an AC.

      --

      --
      Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
    8. Re:yAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about you, but I got laid twice saturday night, three times yesterday afternoon, and a ^H eight great hand jobs last night. Spewed all over the place. And it was with a girls^H^H^H^H^ sorority , too, that I didn't have to pay.

    9. Re:yAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize, don't you, that it would be miraculous if it'd been posted by someone with a Slashdot login.

    10. Re:yAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Turn me on, honey, my Palm is running low."
      Bwahahaha!

      -AC

    11. Re:yAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't get her to suck it huh?

    12. Re:yAH! by Alan · · Score: 1

      (User #33222 Info | http://members.home.net/garsh)

      ...

      Trust nobody with a 6-digit user id


      I don't trust anyone without a 3 digit user ID :)

    13. Re:yAH! by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      Wow, I never received so many comments over a sig before in my life!

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  7. Matrix by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, isn't this how the Matrix started? All these watches and Palm Pilots trying to take over the human bodies for more warmth, covering people at night like kittens on your bed? I can see it now:

    The Future:
    People walk down the streets, scurrying between allyways, keeping out of the light. One man stands in the middle of the street, trying to grasp a piece of cheese left in the alley.

    Before suddenly, he is swarmed by little Palm Pilots, hurtling down the street like killer bees.

    Trinity: Run, Neo! Those are the ones with the ARM processors! They need even more body heat than the old Dragonball ones! And - *gasp in horror* they have wireless antennaes!

    The last thing we hear is one quick "Woah", then the sounds of millions of AvantGo processes launching.

    Of course, I could be wrong.

    1. Re:Matrix by yellowstone · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Before suddenly

      Wow! That's quicker than fast!
      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    2. Re:Matrix by jester-tx · · Score: 1

      That was the first things that popped into my mind.

      AI1 to AI2:

      "Hey, it says that humans make pretty decent batteries.."

      "Wow - maybe we should stop exterminating them and start *farming* them instead.."

      "Hmmmm..."

      --
      -= jester =-
    3. Re:Matrix by NitsujTPU · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's always bothered me, in "The Matrix," the way that they harvest humans as batteries. If the AI was all that intelligent, they would have known that the energy investment in farming humans would be greater than the output. YES, the human body does output X joules of energy, but in order to output that energy in a harvestable form an even greater amount of energy has to be invested. Without the sun's energy all of life on earth would die, farming like that would not be practical.

    4. Re:Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actully the body is very efficiant form of energy conversion. The matrix idea is sound. Also remember that yes the body waste a lot of energy in the form of heat, but that energy is harvestable to. and since you just need the body to make heat/energy i'm sure they could do something to turn off non-esential energy usage in the body and crank up production. We use humans as energy sources in thermo class sometimes

    5. Re:Matrix by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2

      But you have to feed humans, they have to eat, even if they feed humans other dissolved dead humans the dissolved ones cannot be enough to power MORE bodies than themselves considering that humans grow and die naturally in this system. Surely you know that in any system you never GAIN energy... it dissipates. At best you could keep the same amount of energy indefinately. That system would require EVERYTHING in it to be a superconductor and to not do any work.

    6. Re:Matrix by seann · · Score: 0

      bequiet you, the robots beat us, they are alot more smarter than YOU.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    7. Re:Matrix by crow · · Score: 2

      I was bothered by the same thing.

      I figured that there was some residual programming in the computers to help humans, so they went out of their way to use people, despite the inefficiencies such a system implies.

    8. Re:Matrix by UnhandledException · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, the body efficiantly converts energy, but it converts it to stuff like, kinetic energy (motion) of blood, and firing nerve impules a few billion times a minute to complete a thought. Not exactly harvestable. If you crunch the numbers, it's much easier to take all the food you would've fed the guy, and burn it in a controlled furnace.

    9. Re:Matrix by dragons_flight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course the Matrix doesn't work exactly right. Any decent scientist could come up with dozens of things that can't quite work in the real world, but that's not the point.

      IT'S A MOVIE.

      As far as I'm concerned all the details of the world outside the matrix are just fantastical psuedo-science to justify the story they want to tell about and inside the matrix. It's a story about preceptions of reality and the nature of intelligence. The details of the technology aren't important to the points they are really trying to make. Get over it.

    10. Re:Matrix by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      I always got the feeling that the so called AI in The Matrix was actually more of an Artificial Malevolence. While it could have (nearly) exterminated humanity at any time, it chose to go use extraordinary means to keep them under its heel for some revenge / retribution / punishment motive that a true AI would not have deemed a logical choice.


      Basically, it was insane. And it reminded me a lot of the AI in Harlan Elison's "I Have no Mouth and I Must Scream."

    11. Re:Matrix by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      There is a very simple answer to this problem. The humans were wrong. They _think_ the robots are using them for energy, but they are not. The robots are keeping them alive because their programming won't allow them to kill off the human species. The AIs first tried to create a 'perfect' world for people. They thought they were doing good for them. That failed, so they did what they considered second best for them.

      This not only fixes that huge plot hole, but it adds a good amount of complexity and depth to the plot.

    12. Re:Matrix by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I like that solution to the problem, but it still bothers me that physicists in the future would be unable to realize that the original solution (as proposed by the living people in the matrix) is at best suboptimal (lossy energy storage) at worst impossible (energy generation).

    13. Re:Matrix by katarn · · Score: 1

      I read a short story on the matrix web site where they explained that the reason the humans were kept in a virtual environment was because the machines needed to use the %90 unused portion of the human brain for their own conciousnes. And they needed the human brain to be kept cognatively whole, hence the manufactured world. Makes a lot more sense then the dumbed down 'battery' explanation they gave in the movie. I guess they figured their general audience was too dumb to grasp that concept, so they went with a battery instead.

    14. Re:Matrix by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, that certainly adds more depth to the plotline! Perhaps you have a link to the story?

    15. Re:Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Before suddenly
      >
      > Wow! That's quicker than fast!

      Faster than almost instantaneously, that's for sure.

      Anyway, to heck with powering a damned watch. I want to know when I can power a 36" TV so I can lose weight while I watch. Better yet, power my computer and monitor for similar useage.

    16. Re:Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, sure....that's just what THEY want you to think!

    17. Re:Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What physicists? The humans with the "knowledge" are supposed to be a remnant - why would they get anything right?

    18. Re:Matrix by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      If the details of the technology...and indeed the whole basis for the entire fucking plot...is somewhere beyond idiotic, it diminishes the film, no matter how good it is otherwise.

      Even with Jar Jar and Darth "Yipee" Vader, "midichlorians" ruined Episode One for me.

    19. Re:Matrix by decoydog · · Score: 1

      it also makes the title Matrix more appropriate when used in terms of data storage and processing rather than energy generation. Also would explain why Neo was able to effect the virtual reality the way he did. I mean would you really hook up your UPS directly to your computer's BIOS and hope it doesn't accidentally send in a nice electrical surge?

    20. Re:Matrix by shogun · · Score: 1

      insert obligatory human-beowulf-cluster comment here

    21. Re:Matrix by soybased · · Score: 1

      Hah... he's got a point there... Another thing I don't understand is why use such a silly power source if there is a chance of it eventually being able to fight back. Why not just take the resources and space used to create these huge human towers and use them as nuclear plants or whatever they invent.

      Seeing as these robots are super intelligent, they should be able to figure out a more efficient power source :/

      Did they ever explain why the robots didnt just throw nukes or shoot an ion cannon at that zion place either?

      Oh well, the movie is still good.

    22. Re:Matrix by Dwonis · · Score: 2
      One thing I hated about The Matrix was that stupidity about dying for real just because you died in virtual reality. It's just complete and utter crap. The worst thing that would happen is you'd go into shock.

      Other problem: what do you mean you can't pull the plug without winding up dead? Think about it: my computer doesn't explude just because I unplug the ethernet connection. I'm sure you could easily invest some time in making the Matrix interface safe.

      Of course, without these major flaws, the movie is no longer an "adventure", since there's no danger.

    23. Re:Matrix by brood · · Score: 1

      It's always bothered me, in "The Matrix," the way that they harvest humans as batteries. If the AI was all that intelligent, they would have known that the energy investment in farming humans would be greater than the output.

      The computer was defeated by Keanu Reeves for god's sake. It sure as hell wasn't any Einstein.

  8. The big question... by n8willis · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...is storage.

    What happens when you take your wristwatch off for 8 to 10 hours? Sure, generating electricity from body heat is fine when its a pacemaker... take that off and you're likely going to miss it before the eight hour mark.


    Nate

    --
    -- Watch the REAL Jon Katz.
    1. Re:The big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      seiko has a bunch of kinetic watches that go into a low power mode when they stop moving. The hands freeze, but time is still kept. when it realizes that it is being moved again, it puts the hands in the correct place and continues on it's way. I believe the latest ones will keep time for up to a year without movement.

    2. Re:The big question... by meatspray · · Score: 1

      no no no, that's why the company will sell you a low grade bed side heater box than you put all your goodies in.

      think ways to get you to spend $$ if you don;t have to feed it batteries.

    3. Re:The big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like that hasn't happened already! But where do you get the idea that you'll be saving money?

    4. Re:The big question... by [amorphis] · · Score: 2

      Existing "automatic" mechanical watches generate energy with an eccentric rotor, and store it using a spring. I don't see why the same tried and true storage can't be used.

    5. Re:The big question... by progbuc · · Score: 1

      i don't think that would be a problem. there are already watches that generate energy from body movement and they are fine even if left off for days.

      --
      Go ahead and waste your life with your inhibitions, just don't ruin other people's lives with your intolerances.
    6. Re:The big question... by Scivitri · · Score: 1

      Forms of energy. With your self-winding watches, mechanical energy (I know the name, but like I can spell it...) is being generated, then stored as mechanical energy. These heat-watches are changing radiant energy into electrical energy. Considering there's generally a larger-than-desired energy loss with each state change, going from electrical to mechanical (and adding all the mechanical bits to support mechanical energy to the system) then back to electrical is inefficient, and horribly expensive.

      On a semi-related note, I've recently wondered if they've thought to add springs to cars. I've heard of energy collectors that will take the heat generated by your brakes and convert it back to electrical energy when you stop an electric car. But, for the same reasons listed above, you'd be better off adding to the drive-line some place the hardware to use your momentum to wind a spring. As the spring tightened you'd slow/stop, then when you wanted to move again, you've already got a store of mechanical energy considerably closer to the tires than an electrical battery in the trunk.

    7. Re:The big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there was a company that used a flywheel in the car. The flywheels was spun up at night, and it powered electrical motors in each tire. It used braking to speed up the wheel again.

    8. Re:The big question... by whydna · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have one of these; they're pretty neat. First of all, they can maintain time for about 2 weeks without being worn/moving. They store energy in a small capacitor, but when it gets low it only ticks every other second to conserve power. It's pretty sweet

    9. Re:The big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You take off your watch?????

      My wife *KNOWS* it will take surgery to remove my watch from MY wrist!

  9. Well, look at it this way by Leven+Valera · · Score: 0

    With all the friction from the fur, the Energizer bunny truly will keep going and going.

    I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not.

    --
    Woot w00t w007.
    1. Re:Well, look at it this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of friction and fur, I think there should be equal time for pro-static people.

      The anti-static industry has just gone on unopposed for too long.

      We need pro-static electronic workbenches.

      They'd have a work surface made of cat's fur.

      And all the tools would be made of glass.

  10. Scary by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Anybody thought about The Matrix?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  11. cool... a year ago!! by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

    they have had this kind of stuff for watches for a long time.

    you will not be able to power your handheld unless it is somehow connected to your skin... and it probably still wont work unless you are soaked and holding a bare electrical cord.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:cool... a year ago!! by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      thermoelectric batteries are totally new...
      You're talking about kineto-electric batteries - the ones that charge when you shake them or otherwise move them about.

    2. Re:cool... a year ago!! by mmontour · · Score: 3, Informative

      thermoelectric batteries are totally new...

      Link to the Citizen Eco-Drive Thermo watch...

      "Eco-Drive Thermo converts the temperature difference between the user's body and the surrounding air into electrical energy to power the movement. [...] The original Eco-Drive Thermo was launched to great acclaim at the 1999 Basel Show."

      Don't know if it's shipping to consumers yet, but the technology's been around for a while.

    3. Re:cool... a year ago!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the big deal, though, is that the technology is mature enough now to be feasible. As far as I can tell, this thing is just a Peltier wired to generate electricity across the gradient, instead of using electricity to create the gradient.

    4. Re:cool... a year ago!! by Syris · · Score: 1

      This may be totally different...

      The citizen watches and the like work off heat gradients. The electricity is generated from the difference between the temp of your body and the temp of outside air or the like. How would something like that work for an implanted device? You're pretty much 98.6 degrees all over inside.

      I think the innovation here is that it's generated from "low gradient body heat flow." Notice they don't mention why this is new/important, no technical descriptions, nothing. How low can the temp gradient be, if one is still required at all?

  12. Portable vibrators... by FatSean · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now you can pleasure yourself with no physical motion, nor any batteries to change!

    --
    Blar.
  13. Just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how long til I can have it powering my dildo 24/7?

  14. other factors? by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I dunno about you, but I don't sleep with my watch on, nor do I wear one in the shower. Does it store energy very well? What about outside tempature fluctuation? How well does it handle in the winter? Does the amount of fat on your arm matter?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:other factors? by Montag2k · · Score: 1

      The Seiko Kinetic watch that I have has worked for up to 3 weeks after I wore it last. That being said, the energy required to make the little hands go around a watch is nothing compared to the energy required to make an artificial heart beat.

    2. Re:other factors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aight, being a Thermodynamics geek, I feel like answering ya :P

      Energy storage: Just build a cell that provides more power than the device needs, and use a battery.

      Outside temperature/Winter: It will be more effieicnt the greater the temperature difference. So if it's 98.6 degrees, this thing will produce essentially no energy, because there is no gradient. (dunno about temperatures higher than body temp, I'd assume you don't wanna wear it then!) As for cold temperatures, it'll get better as the temperature gets colder. Power plants are like that; the colder it is outside, the better the thing works.

      Fat content: Doesn't matter. Human fat isn't insulating like blubber on whales and such, since there is substantial blood flow near the surface no matter what is underneath.

  15. microns? by egomaniac · · Score: 5, Informative

    I assumed the release was just written by a clueless person when I saw "10 micron amps". Poor fool just meant "10 microamps".

    Then later down I see a quote by the *chief scientist* saying that they plan to develop a battery "capable of generating 3 volts of electricity with 10 microns".

    Maybe I'm just an idiot, but the only definition I know of "micron" is a unit of linear measure. I have no idea how this would relate to anything electrical. I'm still cautiously assuming they meant "microamps", but does anyone have any other ideas?

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    1. Re:microns? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      maby 3 volts with 10 microns of serface area? Dunno how feasable that is, but thats how I read it.

    2. Re:microns? by displacer · · Score: 1

      Probably just misquoted by a tech-clueless reporter. They should have said microamps like you stated.

    3. Re:microns? by egomaniac · · Score: 2

      I had similar thoughts, but a micron is a one-dimensional measure. Certainly couldn't be measuring surface area, let alone volume, and 10 microns is *really* small for a device like this in any case.

      It mainly scares me because this is a press release, rather than an article, and the quote is by their *chief scientist* who hopefully should know better. You'd think a press release would get proofread, but maybe not...

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    4. Re:microns? by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Check the article: "SOURCE: Applied Digital Solutions, Inc."

      That's right, this is not a Yahoo article, despite what the Slashdot summary says. It's a press release by the company in question. It really scares me to see glaring, repeated factual inaccuracies in press releases by tech companies...

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    5. Re:microns? by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

      Let's ask this Scienctician what he thinks!!

      --
      There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    6. Re:microns? by taniwha · · Score: 1

      Probably some pr-flack's spellcheck program has "micron" in it but not "micro-amp"

    7. Re:microns? by Snootch · · Score: 1

      I suspect they just meant "with a device only 3 microns across".

    8. Re:microns? by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

      Well it is written that way on the press release on their website as well.

      I thought perhaps it was just a different meaning for "micron" that I had never heard before, but a quick search on google for "micron amps" turns up no relevant references. More than likely, some clueless PR person "corrected" the what the scientists had given him.

      Of course, as important as this is you'd think they'd have one of the developers check the final draft of the release, but guess not. Technical illiteracy strikes again.

    9. Re:microns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      According to the release it "converts low gradient body heat flow into electrical power."

      I would suspect that this is where the linear measure comes in. A micron-amp would make sense here if we had a fixed temperature difference. The smaller the distance, the greater the current (or voltage assuming fixed resistance).

      The scientist stated the number of 3 volts with 10 microns and the writer of the release said 10 micron amps. Given this, I would further suggest that it should have actually been 10 micron microamps, since 3 watts is a pretty insane amount for a device 10 microns across.

      I'm just curious how they managed to get the temperature difference out of the measure.

    10. Re:microns? by seann · · Score: 0

      I find it really amusing that you went out of your way to say "despite what the Slashdot summary says", when in fact, it said "According to this story on Yahoo, .."
      This story is hosted on yahoo, thus it is on yahoo.

      what part about
      http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/011001/10436_2.html
      do you not understand?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    11. Re:microns? by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      I find it amusing that you completely missed my point.

      It isn't a story.

      It's a press release.

      Thank you for playing.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    12. Re:microns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying 'The world's best punk band' is like saying 'the world's best stick in the eye'. Not a very good thing.

    13. Re:microns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, listen to the Yahoo Finance Vision interview with the CTO of that company.
      He talks of going from 1.5 V to 3 V of _power_
      in a few weeks.

      Gosh!!!!

      Is that an indication of a snake oil company or
      just ignorance?

  16. Micron-amps? by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

    You have to wonder about the technical insight of the company, when their own press release (this IS a press release, not a news story, after all) when they report "1.5 volts of electricity with 10 micron amps". Is that a "microamp"? Next time, folks, let's get the spelling and grammar straight before you talk to the world.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Micron-amps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you have never seen PR folks "fix" the grammar and spelling of things they get from the "nerds"? With experience you will develop a different first guess when you read things like this.

  17. Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by TaleSpinner · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How long before these things can power my
    handheld?



    Screw that. How long before they can power an
    artificial heart!?



    A completely self-contained, reliable, artifical
    heart available off-the-shelf and requiring no
    external battery pack or management would be a
    sea change in modern medicine. Jean-Luc Picard
    lives! Wonder what brand he uses?

    1. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by garcia · · Score: 2

      obviously nothing of this solar system. Who in their right mind would buy anything from Earth? You want to goto the Blahblah galaxy and get all your hardware there. They are known for their blahblahs and blah.

      :)

    2. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by ldopa1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A completely self-contained, reliable, artifical
      heart available off-the-shelf and requiring no
      external battery pack or management would be a
      sea change in modern medicine.


      I can just imagine the Tech Support Call for this one...

      "Press 1 if you're having trouble installing your BeatFree Artificial Heart. Press 2 if your Heart will not start..."

      Of course, that'll lead to all kinds of 911 calls...

      "Help! My husband's heart isn't beating!!!"
      "Ma'am, please calm down. If your would turn your husband over and look at the Service Tag on his left ass-cheek...."
      "Ok, Ok! Here it is... 615-CU-OEM-5YE"
      "Ma'am, I'm sorry but you'll have to call the vendor for support. You're husband has an OEM heart."

      Or even better...

      "Sir, your heart is working fine. You'll just need to replace the power supply!"
      "How would I do that?"
      "Well, take you wife into the bedroom...."

      Seriously, this type of thing has been mentioned in numerous sci-fi novels as an imminent invention. I would love to get a wristwatch display installed underneath the skin on my left wrist, with luminous hands which glow through the skin. It would be cool, it'd never run out, you'd only have to set it once, you could upload new hand-designs onto it, and you'd only see it when you needed it. If it broke, it's a small incision, but it never breaks because it's under the skin. Sign me up!

      --
      The Dopester
      "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    3. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by wwight · · Score: 1

      This could be a bad idea. Imagine:

      "Honey, hand me a sweater. My pacemaker just ran out of juice again."

      Artificial organs powered by body heat would also compound the dangers of hypothermia and frostbite.

    4. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      you'd only have to set it once

      as long as you stay in one time zone...

      as long as it can intercalate to handle leap years, leap days, and leap seconds...

      as long as swatch time never takes over... heh heh...

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    5. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by nick_burns · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then to restart the heart all you have to do is warm him back up. But then again the doctor won't be able to have fun and use the paddles. Awww...

    6. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by john82 · · Score: 1

      Self-contained artificial heart appears to be here. I think we're now up to patient #3. Somewhere I also remember seeing a discussion of combining body-generated power with this latest generation of artificial heart.

    7. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by ldopa1 · · Score: 1

      Good point. Okay, it'd get it's time from the local atomic clock broadcast... :) If you were anywhere that doesn't have one, you probably wouldn't care.

      Alternatively, you could have a resetting fob on your keychain that would set the time. It'd have 4 buttons (+ hour, -hour, + minute, - minute). Of course, the fob would have to have a sliding cover to prevent accidental time setting... :)

      --
      The Dopester
      "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    8. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's an interesting paradox... if yer too cold, you won't generate the electricity you need, so you put on a sweater, but that insulates you so it doesn't have the gradient it needs... it could be a nasty, vicious cycle, expecially for people who are naturally cold anyway.

      But here's the beauty of this thing; it's not actually DRAWING any energy away from you, it's using the energy yer just throwing away as waste heat! The Matrix was right; a human generates heat as fast as a 100W lightbulb. That's a helluva lot of power being thrown away, it could be put to good use :)

    9. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by BadDoggie · · Score: 2
      See the Economist article (22SEP01 issue), "Atom Heart Father". It's available in your library or on-line either free for subscribers or for a $3 one-off reading -- not worth three bucks, if you ask me.

      Basically, an artificial heart is being developed which works on the steam engine principle. Rather than water/steam, another solution is used which will boil around body temperature and, even more importantly, condense close to that temp as well, allowing for the return stroke.

      Neat stuff. Too bad it's "premium content" only.

      woof.

    10. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by jd10131 · · Score: 1

      Was I the only person upset by their "Digital Angel" product. The concept of a device that will use my body heat as power, receive GPS signals, and broadcast my vital signs and location is downright disturbing.

      Perhaps I've read too much George Orwell, but passing off something like that as medical technology sounds good. It's only a matter of time until some politician thinks it's a good idea to use that to track criminals. Then it'll be criminal suspects. Pretty soon we'll all be complacent enough to get one installed because it provides "a tamper-proof means of identification for enhanced e-commerce security"

    11. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Self-contained artificial heart appears to be here. I think we're now up to patient #3.
      At this point, it's still battery-powered. A smallish battery is implanted along with the heart that can keep it going for a few minutes; a larger battery pack is worn on a belt that lasts several hours (IIRC, it uses some sort of inductive power transfer to eliminate the need for wires poking out of the chest). Given that the AbioCor is an electromechanical device, I suspect it draws a fair amount of power...much more than you could get out of some thermocouple-based power source. (Yes, RTGs use thermocouples and can deliver a fair amount of power...but do you really want a lump of radioactive material implanted in you to drive an artificial organ?)
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Can you say "Daylight Savings Time"? Spring forward, Fall Backward and all that.

    13. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by QuMa · · Score: 1

      Only problem is if you use this tech you'd still have to put pads on the outside, or at least very near the skin to have enough temperature-difference to actually be able to get any reasonable amount of power...

    14. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      >I can just imagine the Tech Support Call for this one...
      >"Press 1 if you're having trouble installing your BeatFree Artificial Heart. Press 2 if your Heart will not start..."

      And of course, those with a Microsoft ArtificalHeart XP would be paying for a SERVICE and wouldn't actually OWN their hearts.

      Caller: Oh NO! My husband's heart just stopped! Please help! What do I do?!
      Microsoft Rep: Well, did he just install anything new or make any large configuration changes recently?
      Caller: Well, he has gained a lot of weight lately... with the holidays and all...
      Microsoft Rep: Yes, I see, that would do it. You need to apply for a larger license. Perhaps a 5-seat license. How much does your husband weigh?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    15. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no knowledge of the amount of energy and voltage to correct the irregularity of a heart beat. Based on what I have seen on TV, I would say you need on the order of a hundred of joules of energy to do so and probably 100V to have enough current to do so.

      For a capacitor:
      Energy (J): E = 1/2 C * V * V
      Charge: I * t = C * V

      Assuming E = 100J, V = 100V and everything 100% efficient

      100 = 0.5 * 10 * 10^-6 * t * 100

      t = 55.55 hours to recharge a capacitor/battery
      after each pulse.

      This is probably too long to be useful.

    16. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by edgrale · · Score: 1

      Jean-Luc Picard lives! Wonder what brand he uses?

      It must be running Windows, it crashed once ;)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    17. Re:Self contained artificial organs, cobber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure hope the heart is open-source, can you imagine M$ Heart XP?

      * BSOD: Sorry, heart has experienced a fatal exception...

      * "Product Activation". You reconfigured the host, now you need to contact M$ Activation Center (had a cavity filled, bought contact lenses, and broke a toe requiring a screw to hold it...)

      * UCITA - "Manufacturer Self-Help Provision" - you can disable the software and stop the heart...

      * Mandatory Upgrades

      * "Maintenance Contracts"

      * EULA: "This heart is licensed for use by the original owner with the registered DNA pattern only. It may not be transplanted, transferred, gifted, leased, rented, sold, or buried. Software is not guaranteed or warrantied for any purpose, and is not to be used for life-safety purposes, such as pumping blood, or other liquids such as at a nuclear power plant, or air traffic control facility..."

      * "Service Pack "

      * Denial of Service Attack

      * Active X controls... Visual Basic Scripting

      * http://heart.microsoft.com/yourUIDHere - see real-time graphs and charts of flow, BPM, efficiency, etc...

      * Buffer overflow attack...

      * Reboot/Shutdown?

      * Abort, Ignore, Retry?

      Humorous? Oh yeah, definately - but as we progress in the medical and computer sciences - these are definate possibilities. Some of them (like UCITA) scare the living hell out of me...

  18. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Battery powered batteries huh? How's that for a breakthrough.

  19. Efficiency? by Mr.+Eradicator · · Score: 1

    I didn't see an efficiency of the energy conversion listed in the article. I wonder how these compare to photovoltaics.

    --

    That's Mr. Eradicator to you.

    trance-port
    1. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dunno, but photovoltaics suck. I think the best they've done is something like 33% efficiency, and that's REALLY expensive... a 108V array of 12%-efficient cells costs $12,000. For good cells, the cost would be astronomical.

      I can pretty much guarantee these things are less than 50% efficient, though. A good frame of reference would be a Peltier, because those run on the same principle, they just use the electrical energy to create the temperature gradient; these work the other way.

    2. Re:Efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For comparison, my solar power (recharging) watch has a (give or take) 1/8" by 7/8" solar array. It generates about 3 microamps or so of current under normal indoor lighting conditions.
      The watch virtually supplies enough juice to recharge the secondary cell for the last 20 years or so with moderate use. I only need to change the battery because it no longer holds a charge.

  20. All options by Docrates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As always my memory fails me, but I read in Wired Magazine, about a year ago, about this guy that stored the energy generated by your footsteps and then used it to power all sorts of devices. It turns out he was doing pretty well, but I don't know what came out of it.

    Now, if we were to identify a real demand for personal power generation, I'm sure there's a combination of strategies we could use, like those footsteps, body heat, chemicals, heck, even blinking!.. If you consider how many calories are burnt every day by our bodies in order to make it work, and how much energy is released in all sorts of ways, I'm sure we could power our cellphones and PDA's forever.

    --

    There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
    1. Re:All options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neil Gershenfeld of the MIT Media Lab. I've seen him speak and read his book, "When Things Start to Think". The Media Lab has come up with a whole assortment of amazing devices.

  21. scary stuff? by jptxs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    small devices, with their own power which can be placed on/in any person and run off of them for an indefinite amount of time... tagged at birth, tracked in secret... never off the screen for even a nanosecond...

    --
    we speak the way we breathe --Fugazi
  22. there are TONS of practical applications... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

    ...for instance, pacemakers and artifical organs. The latest breed of artificial hearts has to be charged through the skin several times a week. With a few improvements to this new design, the mechanical heart could be TRULY self-contained. A very practical and useful application if you ask me...

    1. Re:there are TONS of practical applications... by Xenu · · Score: 2

      According to the press release, the device puts out 20 microwatts of power. That is really, really, really small. There are very few electronic devices, let alone electromechanical devices, that can run off a 20 microwatt power supply.

    2. Re:there are TONS of practical applications... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not think there is enough thermal gradient to produce enough energy to power a mechanical heart.

      Think about this, a $2 watch battery can power a modern day watch for 2 years. Do you think they can power an artifical heart that need to move blood with the same battery for more than 2 seconds ?

    3. Re:there are TONS of practical applications... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      from my original post:

      "...With a few improvements to this new design, the mechanical heart could be TRULY self-contained..."

      A few letters come to mind...RTFP.

  23. Digital Angel sounds familiar by pythorlh · · Score: 1

    This sounds like all those sci-fi terrorists.

    "Don't shoot me. If my heart stops, this thing will explode."

    On a more serious note, this thing would be great for my wife. She has had to have numerous pieces of equipment plastered to her to monitor her EKG. That stuff is heavy. I hope this gets into production soon.

    --
    Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
    1. Re:Digital Angel sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your wife needs is an implant.

      The pacemakers here at work are all capable of monitoring EKG, through telmetry. The better ones even have memory to record 'events' for playback at the clinic.

  24. Need... more... Big... Macs... by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1
    I just had a funny idea for a short story: Someone with a lot of electronics on them dies because they didn't eat breakfast and they were sucked dry of energy by their "personal helpers."


    Well, if someone writes that, email it to me. :)

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
  25. More body power methods by exceed · · Score: 3, Informative

    This article at NY Times has an interesting article on other methods of using body energy to power things.

    It mentions methods such as cranking and pumping, and of course, stride (i.e. stride-powered watches). One company created a human-powered electricity generator which creates electricity by hand pumping. If you pump one of these for a few minutes, it can power a cell phone for around 20 minutes.

    --

    void women (int money, time_t time);
    1. Re:More body power methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It mentions methods such as cranking and pumping...

      on second thought... i won't even go there.

    2. Re:More body power methods by ozbird · · Score: 2

      It mentions methods such as cranking and pumping...

      I once had a hand powered torch (flashlight); probably late 70's or early 80's. You squeezed the handle in to spin up a flywheel attached to a dynamo to generate electricity to power the bulb; the handle sprung out again when released. Pumping the handle a few times to get the flywheel up to its top speed took a few seconds, and you got around 10-15 seconds of light out of it before it needed to be pumped again. The only catch was you could only use it for short durations before your hands became too sore to drive the torch!

      A clockwork mechanism where you wind up a large spring with a handle would be much more ergonomic, and using LEDs as the light source should make it long-lasting. The "Dolphin" torches (waterproof, using a large rectangular 6 volt battery) would seem an ideal form-factor for a clockwork torch.

  26. not gonna power much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a little thermodynamics shows this doesn't go a long way

  27. Powering medical devices... one problem by hillct · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And you thought falling into a frozen lake was a health hazard before... just wait until you have an artificial heart run by your body heat.

    Even after the EMTs pull you from the lake they couldn't restart your heart for at least half an hour until your body temperature increased. Bad news.

    Seriously, it doesn't mention what's the minimum temperature the device requires.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:Powering medical devices... one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since thermoelectric devices work with heat gradients, they should generate MORE electricity when the external temperature is cold. Unfortunately, this means that your pacemaker would stop working when your bathwater reaches 98.6 degrees...

    2. Re:Powering medical devices... one problem by BreakWindows · · Score: 1

      As opposed to today, when falling through the ice of a frozen lake when you have a bad heart is a freekin picnic...

    3. Re:Powering medical devices... one problem by TheFrood · · Score: 2

      And you thought falling into a frozen lake was a health hazard before... just wait until you have an artificial heart run by your body heat.

      Even after the EMTs pull you from the lake they couldn't restart your heart for at least half an hour until your body temperature increased. Bad news.


      Good point. If my heart ever fails and they offer to put in a body-heat-powered heart, I'll just tell them "No thanks, I'd rather die now than risk that frozen-lake scenario."

      TheFrood

      --
      If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
    4. Re:Powering medical devices... one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fell through the ice and froze to death one time. Let me tell you, it's not fun!

    5. Re:Powering medical devices... one problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      along with this heart thingy, isn't it the heart that pumps the blood, flowing oxygen to muscles and organs, allowing motion and therefore heat to be generated? i mean, without the heart to begin with, there's no heat to provide the power. do they have them fresh out of the oven for you or do they "install" it and then cook you for a few hours.
      :::"Yep Charlie, I think that this one's ready to be flipped":::

    6. Re:Powering medical devices... one problem by prothid · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you could have the same problem with the external battery pack shorting out. On the other hand, I'm sure those packs are waterproof.

      In the case of a thermodynamically powered heart, they could put it inside, behind the heart, near the core of the chest. If your core temperature drops too far, you're screwed if you have an artificial heart or not.

  28. Not much info by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How expensive is the material to create these small batteries? It's a ceramic, so would it be feasible to create bricks which could be used to line or even build smokestacks? Could this be a replacement for solar cells (the article indicates a temperature gradient as a power source, and those are everywhere). Obviously, these don't produce much energy, but ceramics are notoriously easy to mass produce and fashion into all sorts of artsy shapes.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Not much info by garcia · · Score: 2

      make ceramic heat sinks that absorb the damn heat from CPUs and power the whole house. I know that if I had one of this on my little Alpha UDB (space heater) I wouldn't have to worry about my $90/mo electric bill. :)

      At least the little box would be worth more than the MP3 server it is now.

    2. Re:Not much info by NCamero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to Thermodynamics, the maximum amount of energy that could be obtained by such a device is related to a few things:
      1. The temperature difference between skin contact area and the air.
      2. The surface area of the device.
      3. The ability of the skin to supply power by reheating the chilled area in contact with the device.
      .etc...

      The efficiency of thermoelectric devices was pretty low in my engineering school days. I would assume they have increased like that of solar cells has.

      And such devices could be used in general for smokestacks and other (waste) heat sources. The problem is that the property of insulation is really desirable for such things. And thermoelectric devices like to conduct heat so that more energy can be extracted.

    3. Re:Not much info by mmontour · · Score: 2

      Similar systems are available commercially. Here is one that:

      [...]will produce a maximum power of 12 watts. This system contains a unique DC/DC boost voltage converter and charge control adjustable from 5 to 14.8 V.and can be used to charge a battery and provide over 200 watt-hr per day of energy for various uses. It can be installed in 6" and up, firetube type heating systems with a minimum 125,000 btu. rating and is completely hidden with-in existing equipment.

    4. Re:Not much info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not ceramic, though. The article said it was a semiconductor, so you'll have to deal with ultrathin layers of Silicon, GaAs, InP, or something related... while this shouldn't be expensive (computers, lasers, microprocessors etc...) it's a new(er) technology, we don't have the manufacturing base, and I bet they'll charge out the ass for these things, anyway...

    5. Re:Not much info by Trogre · · Score: 1

      "It's a ceramic, so would it be feasible to create bricks which could be used to line or even build smokestacks."

      ... and shower floors, drainage pipes, and any other place in a building where heat is lost.
      These cells could be a major step in energy efficiency.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    6. Re:Not much info by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
      It's a ceramic, so would it be feasible to create bricks which could be used to line or even build smokestacks?
      It depends.

      Fabrication of components from ceramics can be tricky. For instance the BiSiCuYt (plus oxygen) superconductor that's been around for a few years involves mixing powders together, heating them up for a while, grinding it up again, putting the powder into the finished shape that you want and then heating it up again for a while. If the temperature isn't right, or the the atmosphere you heat it in isn't, then you get either too much or not enough oxygen and end up with a semiconductor instead of a superconductor.

      After all this, it can still be made it quantity, and things have been done to get around the problem that the material is very brittle - but it would still be tricky to make something the size of a brick and get it to stick together, and still work.

      If the material is easy to work with, then a powder could simply be squashed together and heated, or even slip cast like a toilet bowl. If it isn't, there are other processes like vapour deposition (condense the material out on a surface, it only works for a few things) or sol-gel (dip a substrate into a bucket of a gel containing suspended particles of the ceramic - then heat it for a while to make the ceramic stick).

  29. Negroponte on "Powerless Computing" from Wired by RobertFisher · · Score: 4, Informative
    Nicholas Negroponte of the MIT Media Lab has a related article online on this topic.

    Bob

    --
    Science, like Nature, must also be tamed, with a view turned towards its preservation.
  30. 33 million fingernails... by DudeTheMath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gee, I only need 33,333,333 of those advanced 3V, 10u-amp "batteries" to generate a kW. Put on the suit, hook it up to the microwave, and 20 minutes of dancing gives me dinner!

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    1. Re:33 million fingernails... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Your sig presumes that 65 is substantially safer than 75. Do you have any evidence of this (other than your "gut" or that it is "obvious" that this is true?

      Your time would be better spent trying to convince people to follow at a safe distance.

      -Peter

    2. Re:33 million fingernails... by laserjet · · Score: 1

      But if you go 130MPH, you save HALF of the time. Go faster people! (But don't follow so close, and wear your seatbelt).

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    3. Re:33 million fingernails... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly all accidents happen during (or immediately after) a lane change.

      So it's not the speed but the difference in speed that matters. That's why I get pissed off when some Good Citizen hogs the left lane (yep, America) doing the speed limit or less. Every faster car has to make two lane changes to get around these schmucks. Occasionally when I pass one in the right-hand lane I roll down my window and shout "Murderer!". They usually don't get it.

      It's still awfully convenient to blame speeders or drunken drivers for our high rate of automobile fatalities. Our automakers sell us $30,000 cars that become worthless in 10 M.P.H. collisions, but it's not their fault either. They must have great P.R. guys...

    4. Re:33 million fingernails... by davey23sol · · Score: 1

      This is what you call NEGATIVE CALORIE EXCERSISE

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    5. Re:33 million fingernails... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So it's not the speed but the difference in speed that matters.

      This guy just hit the nail right on the head. And the problem is that because speed limits are set artificially low to enhance revenue generation the cops don't care about truly dangerous behavior on the road.

      Think about this for a second. Let's just say everyone is going 80 MPH and following at 4 seconds distance. How is this less safe than people who currently go 55-90 across multiple lanes and follow at sometimes less than 2 seconds distance!

    6. Re:33 million fingernails... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people dont follow minimum safe following distance, especially if they are in a hurry to get somewhere.

    7. Re:33 million fingernails... by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      response to the sig...

      That may be correct. a minute in the course of 8 miles really doesn't mean crap. But I frequently do 250 mile tripe. 500 miles if you count the return. That extra 10 mph results in the savings of roughly 30 minutes each way.

      Besides, if you hit something going 65 mph it is really going to be a mess. The same thing happens at 75. Big mess.

  31. Oh My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.. remember The Matrix?? How all those robots were powered with the body heat of humans?

    Oh man.. I hope we don't build an A.I. anytime soon.

  32. Vote Republican! by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Use poor people to solve California energy crisis!

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Vote Republican! by laserjet · · Score: 1

      Do people actually fall for your sig? Does it cause something to happen or some exploit? Doesn't do anything in Mozilla .9.4 on HP-UX...

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  33. How long before... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    How long will it be before this technology can power a self contained artificial heart? If you can keep one of those running 24x7 on body heat, that'd be a huge step forward. The next step past that would be having the heart change its level of pumping based on how much you're exerting yourself and you could have a device that could feasibly be left in a human for the rest of his life AND have that span be 5-10 years or more.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:How long before... by Arlet · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that you need a temperature gradient. Inside the human body there is hardly any gradient, so this wouldn't work without part of the device being outside the body. Even then, I am sure there's no way this method comes close to generating the power needed for an artificial heart.

  34. Comparison to kinetic electric generation? by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    With the mention of wristwatches I'm reminded of a Seiko watch I saw advertised a few years ago that had some kind of internal mechanism for capturing kinetic motions (via ratchets?) into a windup spring that subsequently would provide sufficient electric power to run the wristwatch.

    So I'm wondering how much electric power can be reasonably gotten from each source.

    You'd have to set limits, so the thermoelectric generation doesn't consider an extreme case of someone naked sitting in artic temperatures full encased with thermo electric generators sucking off the terrific temperature gradient at their disposal. Likewise, a kinetic watch that weighs many kilograms and requires that it be shaken vigorously and constantly at 2 Hz in order to provide many watts is kind of a ridiculous proposition as well.

    So what's next - hemoelectric generators powered by little turbines in major arteries?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Comparison to kinetic electric generation? by egjertse · · Score: 2

      Actually, I own one of those (Seiko Kinetic) watches. The one I have does not store power by winding a spring, but rather by charging a small capacitor. With a fully charged capacitor, the watch can go on for about 3-4 days without any movement what so ever - a great plus for someone as lazy as I am ;)

  35. s3x toy? by sckeener · · Score: 1

    I think some of the techs in my building could be our backup UPS if they designed these into s3x toys....

    also, how would these things work for those of us who are cold blooded (son of two lawyers)?

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  36. "You turn me on." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives it a whole new literal meaning...

  37. MRAM by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

    IBM is already working on a magnetic form of RAM called MRAM which won't need a constant flow of electricity to store information. I'm not sure if or how it would be used in such PDA's but it's a possibility.

    http://www.almaden.ibm.com/st/projects/magneto/m ra m/

    1. Re:MRAM by homebru · · Score: 1

      We used to call that "core" memory.

  38. The standard 'Beowulf cluster' comment... by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can see it now:

    The Boston Marathon becomes a Beowulf Cluster!
    WWF wrestlers finally produce something worthwhile!
    Japanese Corporate Sararymen power their buildings by energy generated during morning calesthenics!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  39. Yer sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Save a life instead--it might be yours! Do the Math!

    Ummmm, I don't kill one person every eight miles. You cut travel time by 10 mnutes every hour by going 75. Worth it to me.

    1. Re:Yer sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distance traveled in 1 hour at 65mph = 65 miles
      Time to tavel 65 miles at 75mph = 52 minutes

      You save 8 minutes every hour, you travel 10 miles farther.

  40. another interesting application... by AsbestosRush · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hearing aids. Not quite as mission critical as a heart, but still good to use as a sort of field test, IMO.

    --
    EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
    AC's need not reply
  41. I am Borg!! by billmaly · · Score: 2

    Now all we have to do is pump up the voltage! Then cybernetically implant a cell phone in/on you, earbud installed into your skull, NO better yet, hardwired into your brain, microphone grafted to a tooth, and you are WIRED BABY!!

    Patch a PDA into it, figure out how to pipe the display to your retina, and we're Cyborgs! All wired, all the time.....

    Now where does the antennae for 802.11 go? WAIT!! I know just the place!! :)

    Bill

  42. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this like that movie Beowulf Cluster? I hope we don't design the Matrix anytime soon, that's just plain scarry!

  43. Perpetual Motion!!!! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Funny


    Just stack one of these babies on top of a P4! That amount of heat'll generate enough electricity to solve California's power crunch!
    </HUMOR>

    Tags included for the humor impaired to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:Perpetual Motion!!!! by davey23sol · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Just stack one of these babies on top of a P4!

      Why the heck not? This actually sounds like a great idea to reclaim wasted energy... it isn't being used for anything important.

      --


      "Yes.. no matter what the culture, folk dancing is stupid." -MST3K
    2. Re:Perpetual Motion!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they do already, except to draw heat away from the processor. check out peltier coolers

    3. Re:Perpetual Motion!!!! by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

      It could be used to power the fan. Oh the implications...

    4. Re:Perpetual Motion!!!! by HRB · · Score: 1

      The Energy you can gain is rather small.

      With the 2nd law of Thermodynamics you get the Carnot-Effiency which is:
      e = 1 - Tc/Th
      which is for normal operating Temperatures:
      Tc=300 K (in Kelvin)
      Th=340 K
      e = 0.12

      Keep in mind that this is the maximum theoretical efficency of a device like this.

      If you take 1/10th of this value you get an effiency of 0.01. Multiplied with an average power consumption of the CPU of 60 W you get an power output of 0.6 W.

      If I look at the power consumption of a typical CPU Fan (=3.5 W), I doubt that you can do anything usefull with this.

    5. Re:Perpetual Motion!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, he put it inside tags.

      Obviously you are still humor impaired!

    6. Re:Perpetual Motion!!!! by unitron · · Score: 2

      Just don't put it on top of on old Socket 4 Pentium 60 or 66, it'll melt down and/or catch fire.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  44. Forgot the 2nd law by orionpi · · Score: 1

    Any heat engine needs a place to sink the extra heat. The energy comes from the transfer of heat, in the direction that increases the entropy of the system. Otherwise it it propetual motion. delta T inside the body is low, maybe if they attached a large heatsink to your chest it could work. If I'm wrong, I'll just use one to power my Athlon :)

    1. Re:Forgot the 2nd law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, use one on the heatsink on yer athlon, then tie it into the fan motor! You get self-regulating temperature on the thing, provided the cell can give you enough oomph to drive the fan fast enough.

      And yes, the 2nd law would allow this, the athlon is adding energy to the system.

    2. Re:Forgot the 2nd law by seann · · Score: 0

      just as I was reading your comment "porpetual motion" came to mind, and I had a brain fart.

      That would be really..interesting

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    3. Re:Forgot the 2nd law by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      sink the extra heat? the artificial heart would pull energy out of your body and convert it to electrical energy. It wouldn't produce more heat... Where would that energy come from? If anything, you'd just have a cold chest all the time. Anyway... I don't know how feasible such a large heat powered device would be, at 98.7 degrees or whatever your body is at, I don't know how much energy it could pull without screwing up your body. What would be cool is a machine that could power itself the same way your heart does... ATP and electron chains n' stuff. I don't claim to be an expert on it, but I don't think that being powered by "bodyheat" is going to produce that much current.

    4. Re:Forgot the 2nd law by orionpi · · Score: 1

      physical process tend to go in the direction that increases the total ammount of entropy(disorder) in the closed system
      This "battery" would not cool down the area surrounding if because heat is a very high entopy energy type as opposed to electical energy which is very ordered. A device can create electrical current from heat but to do this it must transfer some heat to a cooler location (heat sink). Look at a steam engine, yes it does turn heat in to physical energy (which could inturn be converted to electrical energy) but it does this by increasing the entropy of the heat, from a high T in a small volume (firebox) to a lower lower T in a much higher volume ("Smoke stack"). These "Batteries" would work fine on the surface of the body, look at an avarage situation: Body T = 98.6 F room T = 68 F (not the server closet) delta T = 30.6 F . Would NOT work inside the body where delta T is 1 F

  45. how long.. by mlknowle · · Score: 1

    How long 'till someone can post a desccription of how these things work for us techies?

  46. No info by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

    The article is basically the meaty paragraph of the press release repeated about 8 times.

    They're small, like a fingernail, they put out 1.5 volts at 10Microamps.
    They work on heat, continuously.

    That's it.

  47. WHY?!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I can understand how some avid lunatic collector could have many kinetic watches that he doesn't regularly wear.

    What booggles the mind is the description of the automatic winder where it says each watch has a seperate motor. Is that for redundancy? So that if one motor fails, only one watch is wrong?!!

    I guess they had to do something to justify the $4999 price tag.

  48. Rectal Wind Turbine Powers PDA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >> If you consider how many calories are burnt every day by our bodies in order to make it work, and how much energy is released in all sorts of ways



    Hey, if you're that into conserving energy, why not? You might even like it after a while.

  49. movie industry and this technology by NastyGnat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since everyone's brought up the matrix, it's obvious that the movie industry thought of this idea first and will be the appropriate content holders. Everyone will have to pay a tax to generate body heat and will no longer be allowed to share body heat without paying royalties.

    --
    -- this space for rent --
    1. Re:movie industry and this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 Dog Night = Prior Art

  50. Activity generated vs. passively generated power by aarondsouza · · Score: 2, Informative

    Admittedly this post is about passively generated electricity, but there's also been some work on electricity generated by harnessing activity such as walking. This company for example, has been using peizoelectric devices to generate a few milliwatts of power from walking/running activities. For the most part the energy produced is insufficient for anything other than trickle-charging batteries.

    For most of us here on /. putting little piezoelectric generators under each key of the keyboard, and under those mouse buttons would beat those peizoelectric shoes anytime!

    --
    "In mathematics, it's not enough to read the words -- you have to hear the music"
  51. Power handhelds? by rew · · Score: 1

    How long before these things can power my handheld?"

    Pretty long: Handhelds are simply using more power than is theoretically available....

    Roger.

    1. Re:Power handhelds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pretty long: Handhelds are simply using more power than is theoretically available....


      My Handspring Visor seems to run just fine on two AAAs without noticeable drain on the rest of the cosmos.

  52. wahoo! great for those who need to burn calories! by Telek · · Score: 2

    Since this works off of body heat, this requires you to burn more calories! So now the overweight nerds out there can all have a GREAT excuse to (a) buy more gadgets and (b) not excercise!

    "Aww, but I am exercising, I'm playing VirtualQuakeVII on my Palmiot! You have any idea how much processing juice that takes? I can feel myself getting thinner by the minute!"

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  53. heat generated during sleep?? by gol64738 · · Score: 2, Funny

    a lot of people keep saying, 'oh no, if you have a self powered artificial heart and swim in freezing water near the polar cap, you're dead.'

    ever notice how much more heat you generate whilst you sleep or excerise? just store the extra and use while you're 'swimming with polar bears', because i know just how popular it is to swim with polar bears.... sheesh.

  54. larger power ones - power your server! by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Informative

    >How long before these things can power my handheld?

    Yes! They can provide 100's of watts!

    These have been used for years to power deep-space satellites such as Pioneer 10 (solar power tends to not work too well when you get away from the sun). Plus, no moving parts to fail. They use radioactive decay as their heat source.

    They use plutonium-238. It half-life is 87.8 years and emits primarily alpha particles, a non-penetrating type of radiation which requires little shielding.
    Here's a good page from nasa and another from the doe

    Power ranges from milliwatts in 1964, to "multi-hundred-watt" in 1977 (the sole power source for voyager), to 208 Watts electrical (+4500W thermal!) in 1990, to 507 Watts (electical) in 1997.

    Practically, there's that whole radiation thing, plus some costs to enrich the material, and then also disappating the thermal energy released (it operates on a gradient, so you've got to have a cold end to counter the hot end)

    1. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by Mr.+Sharumpe · · Score: 1

      Primarily from a PR perspective this may be a hard sell to the average Joe. Most people, particularly the WWII and Baby Boomer generations, have been taught that radiation is bad and anything associated with the "atom bomb" is gonna kill you or rot out your innards.

      I consider myself to be an early adopter when it comes to new tech, but I have to admit to a certain amount of hesitation when it comes to strapping anything with the word "half-life" associated with it on my body.

      I will be keeping tabs on this technology, though, as it shows tremendous promise.

      Mr. Sharumpe

      --
      -- The above comments are just my opinion. If you are going to flame me, save your time. I am fireproof.
    2. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      oops! Didn't mean to scare you too much!

      The deep space versions use radioactive decay to generate the heat; the one in this article is being suggested for use with the body as a heat source. Both use the same heat-gradient-to-electricity thermoelectric effect (sorry, I couldn't find a good reference for this, but it was covered in my EE physics classes), but different ways of generating the gradient.

    3. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by inburito · · Score: 2

      That was meant more as a proof that this technology is definetly capable of producing a rather large amount of power but using a human may not be reasonable since when we talk about getting 100s of watts the heat source is a radioactive material instead of a plain old human.. You can't really take a traditional nuclear reactor into space anyways since setting one up in a small satellite is not a good idea..

    4. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by HRB · · Score: 1

      Calling a ionizing radiation a heat source is a bit misleading.

      I doubt that those energy cells use the heat created by the impact of He(2+) ions (alpha particles) on a target.

      Instead I assume that they directly use the ionisation created in some kind of semiconductor or other type of multi-material-junction.

    5. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by egomaniac · · Score: 2

      Excellent point, but I'd actually replace "not a good idea" with "not possible".

      A traditional nuclear reactor is, after all, just a glorified steam generator -- and the steam is a waste product which is dumped back into the environment.

      You can't do that in a satellite (even assuming you could miniaturize everything else) because you'd need a replenishing source of water. Easy enough on earth, impossible in space. It'd be pretty equivalent to making a coal-fired satellite, which is a pretty funny mental image ;-).

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    6. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I strapped a whole bunch of copies of 'Half-Life' to my body as a kind of crude ultra-geek-chic armour. You should try it.

    7. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A traditional nuclear reactor is, after all, just a glorified steam generator -- and the steam is a waste product which is dumped back into the environment. You can't do that in a satellite (even assuming you could miniaturize everything else) because you'd need a replenishing source of water. Easy enough on earth, impossible in space. It'd be pretty equivalent to making a coal-fired satellite, which is a pretty funny mental image ;-). You're assuming that you *have* to dump the steam, as if there was something wrong with it. Its still the same water you started with. What is the reason it couldn't be recycled and used again? In a traditional nuclear reactor the water getting turned into steam is used to cool the reactor. The thermal energy stored in the steam is only partially captured by the turbines. The most practical way to cool the water the rest of the way on earth is to allow its escape to nature. In space, getting rid of this waste heat would be trivial -- you wouldn't need to get rid of the water along with it.

    8. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by mcelrath · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Getting rid of waste heat is not trivial.

      Many of these types of reactors were developed by the russians, and even americans for space use. They all operate on the same principle as your air conditioner. They are glorified heat pumps. They need a "hot bath" and a "cold bath". Their efficency is proportional to the temperature difference between the two. The hot part is easy, and comes from the nuclear material. The cold bath is usually a radiator. Now, in space there's no material (like air or water) to pass over your radiator, so you have to depend entirely on blackbody radiation. (i.e. infrared photons carry energy away) If you remember your physics class the power radiated for this is P=sigma*T^4 where sigma=stefan-boltzmann constant and T is temperature. Anyway, this is the limiting factor. Making nuclear material hot is easy, and the upper limit is the melting point of your container. Making the cold bath cool is hard. It requires a large radiator (since power radiated is proportional to surface area!)

      I had some bookmarks on the subject but can't seem to find them now. One of the devices was manufactured by GE. The russians have several. A google search for "nuclear rocket" should turn up something.

      --Bob

      --
      1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
    9. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by egomaniac · · Score: 2

      "Trivial?"

      I beg to disagree. You have to dump the waste heat in order to recycle the steam - and where are you going to dump the waste heat in space? There's no matter to convect it away, so you're left with radiation as your only possibility.

      Keep in mind that space isn't 'cold' in the normal, conversational sense. You could expose your arm to outer space for a minute or two, and it would be absolutely fine, not frozen instantly as most people would assume. Outer space isn't significantly different from a vacuum in a laboratory here on earth, and a vacuum is the universe's most perfect insulator. Here's proof that things don't freeze instantly in space.

      Until someone comes up with a way of dramatically improving the efficiency of heat radiation (e.g. a heat-powered laser), the satellite is stuck with the heat for very long periods of time. Sure, you could shut the reactor off and wait a few weeks, then power it up for another four seconds, then shut it off and wait a few weeks again... but somehow a thermoelectric solution just seems a lot more straightforward. Plus, we actually know how to build those.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    10. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by Detritus · · Score: 2

      The SNAP-27 was used on the Apollo missions to power the ALSEP packages that were left on the Moon. It had a Pu-238 core, lots of thermocouples, and an external heat radiator. It was inefficient by conventional power generation standards, but it had no moving parts or working fluids.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:larger power ones - power your server! by inburito · · Score: 2

      Out of curiosity.. How much does the human body depend on the presence of atmospheric pressure. I mean there is a lot of pressure constantly compressing you and what happens when you take this factor out. Something out of total recall, etc?

  55. Dune by jpostel · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this remind anyone of the fremin suits from Dune? I know they were not electric, but they used heat and motion to purify the waist water from the body.

    It would be more efficient to just use mechanical (kinetic) energy and heat to power the devices than to convert it into electricity, but it is unlikely.

    --
    Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  56. Potato Clock by Root+Down · · Score: 2, Funny

    All of this has amusing similarities to the wonderful 6th grade science experiment of making a potato powered clock. You know - just shove the wires into a standard red russett and watch with amazement as the clock goes. Same principle, really, save that potatos are lumpy, brown, relatively sedentary items that seem to be more agreeable when fried, and people are... oh, wierd.

  57. Tracking Devices. by _ZenZagg_ · · Score: 1

    This would make for the perfect permanent implantable tracking device...I'll let that simmer in your pots for a while.

    --

    "Witty Phrase."

    1. Re:Tracking Devices. by holle2 · · Score: 0

      I got a couple of points to say to this:

      1.
      Well in fact there was a guy in, I think it was britain, who had a chip implantet so it would trigger doors to open up for him and other eletric-computer devices greet him whenever they measured his presence.
      I do not know about the power consumption of that device in that very experiment, but I can see it being powered by such a "battery".

      2.
      Nonetheless there is a, well, *dangerous* downside to this:
      Just think about this movie - can't remember the title, but it is about a prison where the guys have to wear explosive collars - and replace thos collars with little tracking devices under your skin, too deep to remove with a knife but still strong enough to send out tracing signals ... You would be "branded" forever, even if you might just been to jail because of judicial wrongdoing - like it happened before.

      3.
      Still, to carry that idea further, I would love to have an 'implant' like thing doing a job for me like seen in the game DeusEx or that book, ... damn was it Neuromancer ?
      Just imagine a small implant releasing the necessary amount of insulin for people with diabetics. You only need a refill from time to time.

  58. Thermodynamics Question by whatsit · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone that is better versed in thermodynamics can answer this:
    Wouldn't these things be cold to the touch all the time since they are, in essense, based on an endothermic reaction?

    --

    user@host:/usr/bin$ whatis ./java
    java: nothing appropriate.
    1. Re:Thermodynamics Question by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      These devices work off the MOVING of heat from place to place, not absorbing the heat (that would be a violation of thermodynamics - you have to reject some heat to the cold side of a device).

      Actually, if you want to do this, just buy a Peltier module (or buy a Coleman electric cooler and rip the module out of it). Make one side hot, and one side cold, and it will make electricity.

      Some people have said, "Put this on top of your Atlon|Pentium and you can make electricity." True, but a bad idea - the module will act as a thermal resistance, preventing maximum heat from your CPU. Result - one cooked chip.

      The amount of electricity generated by these things is pathetic - you'd be better off buying a World Radio, ripping the crank generator out of it, and using that to power your toys.

  59. B.I.O Bugs with thermolytic batteries by hillct · · Score: 2

    A new kids toy B.I.O Bugs was first advertised on the premier of the new Star Trek series. These BEAM robot toys seek out IR signals to 'feed' on, but there are other such experimental robots that convert sugar to electricity. Consider a toy of this sort with thermolytic batteries where it seeks out body heat to 'feed' on. I can see it now. "Jonny, don't let that bug shove his antena up your..." Oh, damn!

    OK, this technology has potential but it could also make for some really creepy toys.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:B.I.O Bugs with thermolytic batteries by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Imagine some of those bugs being set loose at Comdex, with demonstrations of all kinds of technology, some of which is IR.

      Watch it crawl up to a demo of people using Palm Pilots to swap business cards, or maybe see it block the liquid-cooling unit exhaust for an overclocking demo.

      If it doesn't get crushed in the parking lot, it'll home in on exhaust pipes.

      And then there's the pizza booth with the heat lamps.

      /me ponders a sequel to MT's story about the frog, this one about an electronic insect. Maybe people would find funny a video of something like that.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  60. Umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or until someone plugged in an external power supply. Which you would probably have in any case, just in case your primary system failed.

    Can someone please tell me how this clueless post got moderated to 4???

    1. Re:Umm.... by seann · · Score: 0

      there are alot of clueless moderators.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  61. I wouldn't count on it by garoush · · Score: 2

    I see a double requirement here folks which can make such a tech. not much usable.

    In order for those devices to function they need body energy. The way to get body energy is to "exercise". In order for us to keep exercising, we must "eat".

    Now tell me, is an already over-weighted, under-exercised society, are really willing to appreciate such a device, when it will constantly remind them to "wake-up and move" when it is low on battery? I think not!

    We are a society looking for comfort, those "body-energy-devices" won't appreciate such an attitude.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  62. an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From: Homeslice How 'bout, how 'bout, fart-powered batteries?!

  63. Will this use up my life energy though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If it is using energy from my body, does it cut into the length of my life? Nothing is free, man.

  64. i post to slashdot and i can't spel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

  65. laptops should run cold by Splork · · Score: 2

    Ever since i actually tried using laptops on my lap for any reasonable period of time I decided that they really should run cold, using my body heat for power...

  66. New PC term for "fever" by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    <soccer mom voice> You don't have a fever, Timmy. You're just a little thermo-electrically abundant right now. </soccer mom voice>

    But seriously, will Tylenol® makers Johnson & Johnson now be at odds with the energy companies? I wonder how long before Informed Experts appear on TV commercials to let us know that a fever is a good thing, or the D.E.A. shows up at raves to pass out free thermoelectric generators with handfuls of PMA...

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  67. Matrix by Zelet · · Score: 1

    I am sure they used Nuke energy too. Using humans in large numbers was just to improve the plot and run the toilets.

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
  68. Re:Activity generated vs. passively generated powe by khendron · · Score: 1
    For years now Seiko has had their Kinetic Quartz watches. Like a auto-winding watch, but instead of winding a spring your body movement charges a little capacitor which powers the watch.


    Take it off and it lasts about a week before running out of juice.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  69. Old news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys ran an article on this awhile back.. I can't find the link but it was about a year ago.

  70. Power your handheld? by tcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's a few watts... you'd need something to convert BioGasses into energy...

    ... and a lot of beans...

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  71. hope that was your only problem.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, someone GMing a matrix based game, can find it very easy to swallow. You don't need even greater investment, you need a bit of biotech to recycle. Offcourse you would be losing energy each generation, and ofcourse the energy efficiency would be low (compared to, say, just burning dried humans) but that is OK. If human beings are required for something else too (such as their cognitive ability), it sounds plausible. Otherwise why not use mice or whales instead, which would not require whole matrix stuff and won't hack. Notice that morpheus clearly states his explanation about history is based on little they know, they don't really know what had happened and sometimes he openly "guesses." The real problem with matrix is time. Simulation time is either too slow, or it is reset after a few years or matrix is not isochornic ("different parts experience different time intervals" in case I mistyped it.) None of the explanations are consistent with the rest of the film.

    1. Re:hope that was your only problem.. by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Where is your game based? I am an avid role player and would love to check it out if it's nearby.

    2. Re:hope that was your only problem.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the physical location where the game is held? Then I guess you are out of luck : Turkey.

    3. Re:hope that was your only problem.. by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Heh, oh well, too far away.

    4. Re:hope that was your only problem.. by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      I live in Minneapolis, MN and have a friend who GMs a Matrix style game he designed that's pretty well done. He concentrates on the action aspects of it mostly, and his game design is purposely streamlined to make it fast. It's pretty good.

      If you're interested, send mail to me at eric-slash@omnifarious.org and I'll tell you more.

  72. The issue is thickness by MarkusQ · · Score: 3, Informative
    I believe the issue is thickness; at least, from basic physics I'd expect voltage to be linked to the thickness (and the difference in temp. between the two sides) and amps to be linked to area (and the degree of coupling).

    Thus, it would be meaningfull to talk about any of these or any products (e.g., area x thickness --> volume, voltage x amps --> watts, etc.) and micron amps would be some sort of effectiveness metric (backed, presumably, by some assumptions about body temp, room temp, etc). If this interpretation is correct, for device rated at x-and-so micron amps, total power would be proportional to total area.

    On the other hand, it might just be a typo.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:The issue is thickness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why aren't the moderators kicking this one up to Score:10 or so?? MarkusQ seems to be right on the money. (and there had better be some money in this, cuz I own ADSX stock and at the moment it's worth way less than I invested)

  73. Bean Power by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Why not just eat lots of beans, drink lots of milk, eat lots of raw garlic and wash it all down with lots of beer? The resulting gas would probably power an over overclocked Athlon, assuming you wanted to carry one around.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  74. Clothes and solar panels. by rzbx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We could have clothes that generated power integrating these things into them. Then we could plug in various devices into a plug in our clothes, like handhelds, watches, cellphones.
    But wait, is the price that these things will be selling at be feasable? Why not make panels out of these things, put them across a black panel surface and use them as solar panels that take in the heat from the sun and produce energy, but will it produce more than solar panels? will it be cheaper?

    ideas = thoughts = mind = thinking = knowledge, control of one = control of the others

    --
    Question everything.
    1. Re:Clothes and solar panels. by oojah · · Score: 1

      Solar panels rely on light rather than heat, which means that they still function on overcast days that are cold.

      In other words, I reckon that solar panels would win out.

      Roger

      --
      Do you have any better hostages?
  75. Body energy? sheesh! by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

    i seem to remember a similar technology involving a can o beans and a bic lighter.

  76. He's dead Jim by brownjim · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Is he dead?"

    "Yes, see, his watch stopped."

    --
    --
  77. Microtest - DeepThroat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please email me in reference to your detailed missive on Microtest's legacy. Together we can get to the bottom of this and see Open Source prevail. nfwriter@yahoo.com

  78. URL for that watch by dbCooper0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shockwave Version here, and Non-Shockwave version here.

    Another post in this thread correctly states that the energy is stored electrically in a capacitor, not a spring.

    I had a summary of the concept all set to submit, but like an idiot I tested my url with the same browser session I was submitting with, and lost it! No time to re-type it. The links tell all.

    My kid in the Navy brought a fake one home last winter, and I'm going to take it apart to see how close the knock off is to the real one :)

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  79. 150 watts and what do you get? by dfuller · · Score: 1


    When doing general guesses about how much cooling
    one might need for a room, a rule of thumb is to
    assume the average human is about a 150 watt
    lightbulb. So there's plenty of energy there to
    harness.

    So I was thinking... Looking at all the cool knee
    braces they've cooked up for folks who are in
    rehab or need the support... What about a very
    much lighter one with some kind of embedded
    dynamo?

    By the way, Seiko's been building electronic
    watches that store up the body's kinetic energy
    for a while.

    And I am wearing a primitive version of all this -
    a Seiko self-winding watch.

    Dave

  80. hmm by Trixd · · Score: 1

    what about the eskimos...eskimoes...people in alaska?

    --
    -- When you're downloading off of eDonkey and IRC you're downloading communism...remember that --
  81. What about peltier? by jkerman · · Score: 1

    Peltier thermocouples also work inverse. Instead of using electricity to pump heat, you can also put an ice cube on it and get about 3V out of it. How is this different?

  82. I have my doubts by gUmbi · · Score: 1
    I have my doubts about this 'invention'. This is a company that makes wristwatch devices that include GPS and some kind of satellite communication. And this new battery is supposed to power this device.

    Well, first, this is a publicly traded company with a market cap of $30 million and a trading price of 22 cents (up 5 cents from yesterday). And as far as I can tell, the GPS wristwatch is purely vaporware right now. I think they are just trying to get publicity.

    Think of it. Provided they can be built cheaply, if this thing could do anything close to what they say it can do, we could litter the ground with these things and collect free electricity from heat.

    Jason.

  83. Efficiency, and potential uses... by chhamilton · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The upper bound on efficiency of these things is governed by the Carnot cycle limit; so for a temperature gradient from T2 down to T1, your upper bound is (T2-T1)/T2. So, I the power generation is limited by the surface area of the thing (governing the wattage of heat going through it) and the temperature gradient itself.

    I guess if we assume a skin temperature of 34 celsius (307 K), and an ambient temperature of 20 C (293 K), then our efficiency is bounded by about 4.5%. Given that we dissipate on average 64W/m^2 at idle, and a "fingernail" sized device (1.5 cm^2), we should have about 0.001 W available to us, or 0.4 mW assuming 100% of Carnot cycle efficiency. At 1.5V, this gives a maximum current output of 0.27 mA. Since they are getting about 10 microA, then we can assume they see an efficiency of about 4% themselves. So, it seems like there's room to grow!

    Maybe they'll be able to power those PDA's after all!

    There's a quick discussion here with regards to human-body-power available for wearable computing.

    Also, there's another company that builds thermo-ionic power generating chips (cleverly named PowerChips) called Borealis. They see them being used as a second-stage on typical gas turbine/etc.. generators. They claim to see 20% efficiency wrt the Carnot cycle limit, a few orders of magnitude better than most thermo-electric (Peltier based) generators.

    BTW: All these calculations are very "back of the envelope"!

  84. At the risk of sounding anal by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only things that I'd add into the whole mess:

    1. Didn't Morpheus mention something about "a certain form of fusion"? I'm assuming something biological is required for that to work. (Hey, it's called science fiction for a reason.

    2. Without sunlight, we can assume that most of the life on Earth got zapped (humans always watching out for themselves). From there it would have been pretty logical to go from "destroy humans" to "capture/harness for fusion system/keep trapped in system". (Maybe the Matrix requires some sort of neural net to run - aka, the machines *need human brains to keep their own programs running*, which makes them even more dependant on us as we are on machines (which lets Morpheus's comment on the irony of humans using tools make sense).

    You'd have to assume that by the future, other sources of power (nuclear, oil, etc) are also depleted (which may have launched the whole humans vs AI war to begin with - maybe they didn't *want* to have the energy star label on their monitors...)

    1. Re:At the risk of sounding anal by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Maybe the Matrix requires some sort of neural net to run - aka, the machines *need human brains to keep their own programs running*

      I know at least one series of books which has ventured on this subject much more thoroughly: Hyperion by Dan Simmons

      Seems to me that this will be the real reason that the machines haven't done away with their human creators...

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  85. who care about body heat by Pierre · · Score: 1

    I wonder how hot they can get. I'd rather strap them all over my car's exhaust pipe and get rid of the alternator.

    And how about geothermal? Maybe they don't scale up...

  86. One question by ahde · · Score: 1

    where do they stick it?

  87. Hoax alert, anyone? by jhme · · Score: 1

    This "story on yahoo" (a press release, really) makes be just a little bit suspicious indeed.

    I admit that Thermodynamics weren't my favorite, plus they are long behind, but the repeating use of "microns" instead of "microamperes" plus the fact that this company stops just short of selling kitchen sinks... Well, call me paranoid ;-)

    Would that be my first troll?

    --
    -- Fast, Cheap, Well. Pick two.
  88. Another Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An article that is very similar to this one, yet a lot more informative is at TacoInspector.com.

  89. pacemakers would not work by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    No gradient (or too small). Or do these things have external parts? (Darn!)
    Anyway, you need a gradient. Cold and wet weather is best.

    If anyone is thinking to make the most expensive coat in the world: you have to lose a lot of heat to run the little heater. Well at least it's not as bad as the sunpowered pocketlight.

  90. Insertion by rev_icon · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is every one wondering exactly where are we supposed to stick these batteries to power our palm pilots?

  91. matrix by vancleve · · Score: 1

    isnt this the same type of tech that'll be used in the matrix???

  92. well... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    I admit that the idea sounds good, but with my luck they'd give me one to power my pacemaker.

    Then I'd forget and go ice fishing or skiing and have a brown out or worse!

    Nope. I'll stick with the bunny batteries for now.

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  93. Thermally powered hearing aids by Dokta_C · · Score: 1

    Ooooooooooooooo. Nice accessible site. The pinnae are used by the body as radiators (that's why they stick out into the airflow) so you'd be copying a tested design. This idea has potential.

  94. Super secret power-up by WyldOne · · Score: 1

    "Will do sex for Quake3". Make the spouses and porn site happy too.

    --

    make Linux, not Microsoft. sin(beast) = -0.809016994374947424102293417182819
  95. A step forward for womankind? by serutan · · Score: 2

    Wow, just think what this could mean for the personal vibrator industry!

  96. I have a vision!!! by hhe_hee · · Score: 1

    I see computers with artificial intelligence, humans put in boxes like their where in a farm. Whats that? It seems that they have cables connected to their body. Noooo... their comin to get us to fuel the Matrix's campaign of domination in the "real" world.

    But wait!!! I see a hero, a hacker, he looks kinda Keanu Reeves. And theres some mysterious rebels too...

    --
    2 reptiles beneath your current threshold.
  97. Cow Powered Generators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, so you get a bunch of cows, or pigs or horses or something and just have walk on conveyor belts.

    hook'em up, and just keep feeding them.

  98. Oxymoron by nuetrino · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the Oxymoron battery ad from 'Sheep in the Big City'? The batteries last as long as you do!

  99. You've got it backwards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "How long before these things can power my handheld?"

    You really should be asking how much you can power with you handheld!

    Thank you, thank you. Godnight Everybody!

  100. The Matrix by raumdass · · Score: 1

    Can't help but think of the Human Battery stuff from the Matrix. We better watch out for those Aibo pet-things from Sony. It's just a matter of time...

  101. 36DD power cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thermonucleonic power cell breast implants

  102. Uses of this as a replacement for solar cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone else hinted at this, but if they are made out of ceramics, a readily available and easy to make material, why not make them HUGE to generate electric from the Earth's heat? Make the walls of buildings out of this stuff to generate power for that building?

  103. Medical uses could extend life by 100 years by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    As long as one keeps a core body temp, imagine:

    Replacing a diseased heart with a turbine

    Creating an internal dialysis system

    Recreating almost any organ's function

    Putting an internal immune-enhancement that monitors the bloodstream and zaps anything foreign, even cancer cells. Early detection begins at the 4-50 cell rance instead of the 1000 cell range now considered "early".

    Now for the super-powers :)

    A built-in "tazer". Two electrodes in the tips of your intex fingers. Touch someone and ZAP! down they go.

    A video record/playback system for espionage. Go on the tour. Pass the body-search. Look at everything and record in clear, digital format for later review.

    A built in electromagnet system wired to your feet and grafted to your bones. Stick to any metal surface. Astronauts suddenly have gravity in a microgravity environment. Wire the palms too and climb up walls.

    Fun stuff, it's gonna take one mother of a battery to do it all. And the recharge will take a while.

    Out

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  104. Great potential... by Bagheera · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is one of those technologies that could have great potential both in the biomedical field and in the portable device field. Unfortunately, the article doesn't give much detail - and has a couple of strangely glaring errors (10 microns?)

    From what I remember of RTGs (Radio Thermal Generators - like those used on Deep Space probes) rely on a temperature differential to generate power. With a body powered unit, you'd be looking at drawing power from the difference between human body temperatute and the ambient temperature outside.

    If it's 98 degrees outside, hope you have -real- batteries around to provide power.

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  105. Techies dying of hypothermia by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I got my digital planner, laptop, wireless transmitter, and cell phone watch all plugged into my thermbattery. Now, someone turn up the damn heat its freezing in here.

  106. Not without a sense of irony by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Now how many BTU's of body heat does a person generate again, Morpheus?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  107. Power body suit by Alsee · · Score: 1

    What if we made a full body suit of these things? Lets see..

    10 micro amps per disc / .01 sq inches per disc = 100 microamps per sq inch

    average human body 2600 sq inches * 100 microamps per sq inch = 0.26 amps per person

    It's interesting to note that 0.26 amps is about triple what it takes to kill a person.

    0.26 amps at 1.5 volts = 0.39 watts, or 0.0005 horse power

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Power body suit by Black+Acid · · Score: 1
      It's interesting to note that 0.26 amps is about triple what it takes to kill a person.

      According to an employee safety newsletter as well as OSHA, 16mA is the maxiumum current you can grasp and let go. However, high currents cause the skin resistance which is normally 10K when wet, 1K when dry, to drop to a lethal 200 ohm. This causes even more current to flow. At 100mA, ventricular fibrillation occurs, which is needless to say extremely lethal.
  108. If you can't stand the heat... by closedpegasus · · Score: 1

    How long before these things can power my handheld?"

    You'd have to have one mother of a fever...

  109. New Weight Loss Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If these help you lose weight by reducing body temperature and increasing metabolism they would sell like hotcakes.

  110. Fat Dude with Prime Power Areas For Rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I will be glad to host your power needs. I'm a large male with virtually no body hair. Order now for prime power locations:

    Rolls on Back of Neck: $0.25/hr
    Underarms: $0.50/hr
    Between Butt Cheeks: $5.00/hr
    Back Side of Balls: Call for latest price.

  111. the basis for the plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that the machines are trying to alter their environment to increase their available "food", not that different from humans

    1. Re:the basis for the plot by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      No...if the machines were not using humans to do this, there would be no Matrix, thus while there might still be a Zion and a resistance and stuff, it would all take place in the REAL world...IOW, it would be like the future in the Terminator movies.

      Ultimately, the entire plot for the Matrix is based upon the idiotic notion that humans make good generators. Even if animals were good for this, in general, mice would be better.

      (Oh, and "Combined with a form of fusion..." I think the fusion would be more productive)

  112. Re:Thermoelectric Applications by nello · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ceramics is likely just the closest familiar idea. The overwhelming majority of the good bulk thermoelectrics (and all of the nanostructured ones I'm aware of) are made of semiconductors. Not Si or GaAs, but more exotic ones like bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3), bismuth antimony (Bi-Sb, an alloy), &c. In general they come from the bottom right f the periodic table and are pretty toxic and expensive to make -- about equivalent to the CdTe in solar cells.

    That said, there are already thermoelectric devices being used to reclaim waste heat in power plants. Also, the NASA Voyager space probes use thermoelectric devices coupled to a radioactive Pu source to generate their juice - mostly because thermoelectrics are pretty reliable devices.

    More applications are in cooling -- using the opposite physical effect for localized cooling, especially for applications where vibration or noise are problematic. Laser diodes and some other IC devices use thermoelectrics for cooling (or at least temperature regulation). Larger applications, like household refrigeration, aren't practical (despite the environmental benefits) because the efficiency is ~10%, compared to 30% or so for your fridge and ~90% for the enormous air conditioners in office buildings.
    Current research is largely driven by electronics folks -- wouldn't it be nice to get rid of those noisy, bulky fans in your computer?- and is focusing on, of course, nanotechnology as the answer for improving the thermoelectric figure of merit.

    --Janell
    Is it really obvious this is the subject of my (ongoing) chemistry PhD work?

  113. On a sick note... by kryptik_79 · · Score: 1

    The only time the small, attached or inserted, medical devices would fail is when the body is cold...

  114. spare internal power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could a patient have both a bio-battery and an old fashioned one at the same time? and use the bio one first, but in failure turn to the other?

  115. fan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what kind of shitty computer do you have? I didn't know they still made them with fans

  116. A Locater? by gurensan · · Score: 1

    While I think it would be cool to have a body-powered GPS system, I'm not so sure I like the idea of the device they have lined up to use the 'battery' reporting my whereabouts, pulse rate, mental state and the identity of the girl I'm with to her parents!

    Oh well. I guess I'll have to start dating my pets.

    --
    You are all fartheads.
  117. you got zits on your ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your backyard has more blackheads than a compton barbeque

  118. That's not a story. It's a press release. by CorporateProgrammerD · · Score: 1
    I should know, I've written one or two.


    Anyway, this is from the folks that make the Digital Angel. This newest press release is a way to power those little babies until something in them breaks. Look ma, no batteries!


    They're wonderful little devices. Full of medical, security, and law enforcement possibilities. Lifesaving, Terrifying little devices.


    Welcome to the future. May the gods have mercy on your soul.

    --
    To email, do the obvious.
  119. Borealis by Animats · · Score: 2

    I dunno. Those Borealis people sound like a scam. They claim a new type of electric motor, a new type of solar cell, a new thermoelectric cooler, and a really big magnetite deposit ready to be mined. And somehow none of these things is actually in production.

    1. Re:Borealis by chhamilton · · Score: 1
      I had the same feelings, but at the same time the technologies they advertise aren't far fetched. In fact, the "new" motor isn't "new", and the PowerChips and SolarChips are definitely not new.

      From the gist of things they're claiming that efficiency of these devices can be improved through precisely designed structures printed with MEMS technology. Otherwise, the fundamental technologies they're using are those in use by everyone else...

      I guess we'll just have to wait and see...

  120. It's the Pacemakers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks, I am surprised none of you has mentioned this. How many of you have relatives with pacemakers? How are they powered/charged? How often do they need to be recharged/replaced? A device that can power the pacemaker from naturally generated power will solve those problems.

    Those of you without pacemakers, imagine yourself with an underskin battery box or charging loop. How about some NiMH regargables in your guts?

  121. Seiko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't Seiko watches been generating power by heat gradients for years?

    As for how long the watch lasts without wearing it, i currently have a kinetic Seiko watch that lasts for 14 days without wearing it (i've tried it a couple of times).

    Newer models last for up to 4 years without any movement by stopping the hands. I don't see why the temperature gradient watches would be any different.

  122. Maximum Power Generation by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

    The greatest amount of electric power you can get to a heat source is calculable. Consider this: at rest, a human puts out about 80W as heat, and this is at 37 degrees C. The greatest possible efficiency for a heat engine is Carnot efficiency,

    e = 1 - L/H

    In this case the value is

    e = 1 - (273+20)/(273+37) = 0.055 = 5.5%

    (Room temperature assumed to be 20C)
    Multiplying this efficiency by the power wasted at rest, we get only 4.4W. Considering that this assumes you process every watt put off by your body, a small fraction of that is all you can expect.
    So don't expect too much power from these sorts of things. You'll never run a Pentium off this.

  123. energy still comes from somewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind this isn't free energy. Don't be suprised if your waist constantly feels cold when you wear one of these devices. Or maybe you might find yourself eating a little more...

  124. Heatsink Leeches? by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm, converting heat to power. Would there be a way to hook these puppies up to saw a laptop heatsink? Capture some of that excess, wasted heat to power the cooling fan or something. Granted yes, the fan takes a puny amount of power compared to everything else, but every little bit helps, right? Just think, if you had enough of them you could power up your hard drives from the heat off your monitor.

    --
    "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
  125. Re:Portable vibrators... (OT) by spauldo · · Score: 1

    Actually, a female friend of mine had something similar without power requirements at all - just get a clit piercing and you're set to go. Get off just by walking down the street. After a while you get used to it, so you just take it out for a couple days (apparently it doesn't close as easily as other piercings) and you're ready to go again.

    Cool thing was I always had an audience when I practiced on my bass. She had a habit of sitting on my amp...

    --
    Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  126. thermocouples by nguyenht · · Score: 1

    Remember the physics classes where you would stick one end of a probe into liquid nitrogen and the other at room temperature and you would register the voltage difference and manually calculate the temperature. You know - a thermocouple.

    I wondered when somebody would be able to make thermocouples generate usable energy. Looks like this is what ADSX is doing.