Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake Linux Gamer Edition

JWhiton writes: "According to Blue's News, Mandrake and TransGaming are going to ship a new distribution of Mandrake Linux specificially aimed at gamers. It comes with The Sims and TransGaming's WineX for compatibility with Windows games. Apparently it's going to ship on November 9th."

232 comments

  1. Is Linux ready for this ? by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 2, Funny
    I wonder if the point-and-drool herds that think Linux is the next 'cool' thing will be able to cope with it.

    I watched a co-worker attempt to use my laptop which has debian installed on it. How I laughed he actually asked me if I was running XP !!

    The dork thought that KDE was XP

    Although world domination is the goal, I can't help but wonder if the windoze using public is ready for it.

    Be prepared for a whole load of newbie questions to clog up the mandrake mailing lists and newsgroups!

    1. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maybe that says more about the originality of the KDE interface than it does about your co-worker's knowledge? walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, etc

    2. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what? coping good ideas from different platforms is a good idea. most open sourced projects do this.

      in reality, KDE is more like MacOSX, as their KDE panel(forgot name) is more like a combination of the MacOSX dock and a NeXT wharf (esp. with kasbar, multiple panels, panels which are not 100% width/height, etc..). also, you can turn on mac mode menus in KDE, which is very nice becuase I am used to MacOS.

      also, I think gnome is like this but I'm not sure since I haven't used it in a long time

    3. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by abdulla · · Score: 1

      attitudes like this are what make windows so popular, you don't alienate people because of there lack of knowledge, when these turn of events happen to you, i hope the person in your shoes has the kindness of heart not be as cruel as you

    4. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by colatek · · Score: 1

      I am going to write Mr. Torvalds and see if he could appoint you "Mr. Public Relations" for Linux. Heck, with your charm and wit I see Linux becoming a big on the desktop. You really know how to set a first impression on someone. Thanks.

    5. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what everyone wants? It seems like I hear a lot of complaining about linux newbies, but everyone has to learn sooner or later.

    6. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rightly so. What do you want? People to get "certified" before installing Linux? What we need is newbies galore!

      As the saying goes " Once you try sex there ain't no going back to holding hands!"

    7. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I find amusing over and over again?
      On the one hand all the Linux nerds yell at Microsoft and pity (even despise) users of Microsoft OSs in endless threads of criticism.

      On the other hand, however, if any Linux distro should be too user-friendly or targeted to lure Windows users over to the other side the same people cry out criticising the distro for their "sacrificing" the Linux spirit (or some sort of obscure reason) claiming that only a Linux which nobody but techies can use is a true Linux. At the same time they whine about all the ex-Windows users which will change to Linux now and ask stupid newbie questions.

      My question here is: What is this all about? A holy crusade? A we-hate-all-who-are-different-but-what-we-hate-mor e-is-those-lying-converts style of thing?

      For most people this isn't about beliefs, monopolies and other sentiments like this. They just want to sit down and use their computer and they couldn't care less if the programs doing their job taste like Windows, Linux or chicken soup.

      I, personally, am a Linux newbie but I like this OS and intend to get to better understand it. But it takes some time, you know. Some people do have a job and aren't too fond of spending their evenings ploughing through obscure HOW-TOs to find that one-hundreth command-line switch to make their program work. I do agree that a lot of people take the easy road and post every stupid question without *ever* checking anything even faintly resembling a manual but that's the way people are and it's not directed against Linux but it's the same way on all the boards where *everybody* can post. It will take some time (several years or more) and the newbie questions will eventually drop to the *normal* (there will always be dumb questions).

      I'm just curious why the Linux community isn't happy about what's been happening with *their* OS lately. Isn't breaking the MS monopoly the ultimate goal? Why, then getting more and more people to use *your* OS should be a victory. And if some Linux desktops get to look more and more like Windows, what's wrong with that? People will use it and be happy. And the Linux nerds can still configure everything via command-line parameters and work in text-shells if they want to. I used to think that what makes Linux a good OS was the core and not just the looks. So if the looks are candy for the children, the core is still the same stable, reliable OS the Linux community is proud of, or isn't it?

      Sorry for that rambling, and, yes, I know that I shouldn't argue like there was just one sort of Linux-user. Just wanted to get this off my chest once cos that was something I really find peculiar in the Linux community... So no offence, but think about it...

    8. Re:Is Linux ready for this ? by Malcolm33 · · Score: 1

      'maybe that says more about the originality of the KDE interface'. Considering the standard KDE interface has been around in many similar forms for about 2 years now (even more using older ones) and Windows XP was only realeased a few days ago. I think what you actually meant to say is 'maybe that says more about the unoriginality of the Windows XP interface'.

  2. This is awesome! by DavonZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finally there may be a distro that can capture the gamer and the techie. I hate dual booting! This could be the answer I have been looking for. I agree that I am not too hot on the Mandrake distro, but this does have potential.

    LD

    1. Re:This is awesome! by btellier · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget it, man.. It's a noble effort but until the software companies start actually dual-developing Linux games and releasing them SIMULTANEOUSLY with the windows distro this will never happen. If simultaneous dual platform development was ever going to happen it would've happened with the Mac 5 years ago. Macs still have a bigger marketshare on the PC than Linux, but game companies refuse to take the extra expense to do the ports for them.

      Linux has it's use with the person who wants total control over his OS, not with the person who needs the latest/greatest games. Until Linux gets a >10% market share on the home PC market we're not going to progress any further on the games front.

    2. Re:This is awesome! by Kargan · · Score: 1

      Definitely agreed, I've never gotten excited about anything to do with Linux and gaming, even though I'm an avid fan of both, until now. This actually might go somewhere indeed!

      --
      Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
    3. Re:This is awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what you neglect is the ease of porting a game of that runs on windows, on the i#86 processor to Linux on an i#86, It is much harder to do then to port it over to the PPC archetecture

    4. Re:This is awesome! by rat_herder · · Score: 1
      It's a noble effort but until the software companies start actually dual-developing Linux games and releasing them SIMULTANEOUSLY with the windows distro this will never happen.
      This is where it starts... The games won't come until a LinuxOS like this is well deployed. Mac Gaming is sweet, I can hook up with your stinky PC and play Diablo 2, Deus Ex, Quake III, Unreal Tornament, Etc etc...
  3. Re:What the fuck is wrong with slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    What the fuck is wrong with slashdot?


    It is scripted using Perl and uses a MySQL database backend.
  4. Hooray! by Apreche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I currently use Manrake 8.1 and I use it for everything except multimedia and games. For which I use win2k. Of course most of everything I do is multimedia and games. Hopefully if this version of mandrake works well, and isn't an unstable piece of junk then I will only have to use windows for multimedia. I just wish it were free. I'm not willing to pay 70$, especially since I don't want the sims.
    I think I might just keep trying to configure mandrake 8.1 to do all that stuff.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Hooray! by All+sporks+are+fags · · Score: 0

      You might have some trouble with Mandrake, if you're running it on an Intel-compatible..

    2. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use xine (for mpeg) or aviplay (for divx, avi, asf), or realplay (rm). install the flash plugin for netscape/konqueror, it works nice.

      games- play quake3? best FPS shooter out right now.

    3. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      games- play quake3? best FPS shooter out right now.

      How about Soldier of Fortune? Or maybe even Heavy Gear II...?

    4. Re:Hooray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: goat-related link above!

    5. Re:Hooray! by SensiMillia · · Score: 1

      XMMS does everything Windows media player does... It plays your divx compressed .avi files just fine.
      Does Windows Media Player decode .ogg files?

  5. This is GREAT!! by HanzoSan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a GOOD MOVE!!

    packing games with linux and calling it the gaming edition is genius.

    Gamers who may not otherwise have ever known about linux will see linux plays games and may actually improve frame rates and speed, they might actually buy it just for gaming purposes considering they spend $500 almost for Gforce3 graphics cards and soundcard. Linux could be sold on the fact that it is a "gaming" OS.

    Think about that.

    Example. Linux Mandrake Gaming Edition (Starcraft)
    Linux Mandrake Gaming Edition (Warcraft 3)
    Linux Mandrake Gaming Edition (Quake 3)

    And if they manage to somehow get these versions to have higher frame rates ,extra features, and perhaps make it easy enough to install, people will have a reason to use linux. To play their favorite games!

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:This is GREAT!! by X-Dopple · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm also excited about this. Maybe, finally, I can actually RUN Unreal Tournament! Imagine:

      standard linux attempt at launching Unreal

      [dopple@c851470-a dopple] unreal

      WARNING: Unreal has detected that you want to launch Unreal Would you like a headache? (Yes/Yes)y

      WARNING: Missing dependencies

      libyousuck.so
      libhaha.so
      libObscureVoodooDriver.so

      WARNING: Unreal is too retarded to find libglide2x.so

      WARNING: Unreal has found libglide2x.so, but it is a cursed version

      WARNING: X sucks for 3D gaming

      error: DRI is enabled, but it wasn't compiled by the programmer's girlfriend.

      WARNING: Detected posts on Slashdot proclaiming Linux gaming to be the key to mainstream acceptance. Would you like to post as an AC refuting these claims? (Y/Y)

      Mandrake: Linux Gamer edition

      just double-click the Unreal icon. Just like Windows

    2. Re:This is GREAT!! by linuxlover · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      I went through some weeks trying to install UT on my Linux Mandrake 8. Eventually I gave up. I am relieved to see I was not the only one!

      But I am happy with quake3-arena and SOF right now.

    3. Re:This is GREAT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I installed UT yesterday on redhat 7.2.
      Then I started it and then I played it.
      It just works.

      Off course I have no GLIDE crap on my system :-)
      matrox g450 using the only true gfx API , OpenGL

      stein

  6. This is why... by kikta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Mandrake is important to gaining a foothold on the desktop and with the average user. Are they the most stable distro? No. Even though I love Mandrake, I won't even try to pretend otherwise on that issue. However, do they have a shit-hot installation routine, lots of pre-loaded goodies, excellent configuration tools, and a strong focus on giving the end user what they want/need? Hell yes.

    I always hear Mandrake derided by a signifigant portion of the /. crowd, but for what faults it may have as a distro, it is also the missing link. RedHat will take servers, SuSE the scientific/engineering community, Debian the ubergeeks, and who on the desktop? That's right, Mandrake. This will help to increase the foothold they have already started. (Hopefully!)

    1. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Please don't discriminate like that. RedHat on servers? I don't think so; you need something more solid and stable. Suse for science/engineering? Why? And there's plenty of other good distributions, e.g. Slackware. These classifications may make sense to you, but they don't to me, so I doubt they're valid in general; they just make people get angry at you or think you're a stupid slashdaughter.

    2. Re:This is why... by Andrewkov · · Score: 5, Funny
      RedHat will take servers, SuSE the scientific/engineering community, Debian the ubergeeks,

      I'm not an "ubergeek", I just like decent package management!!

    3. Re:This is why... by Ozric · · Score: 1

      Who said that mandrake is not stable? I have never had a problem, I started with 5.1 just to not have to rebuild kde. I think that alot of newbies using mdk have given it a bad rap. The fact is they just don't know how to fix the little problems that do come up now and then. Linux is Linux, I roll my own kernels and if I don't like a config I vi it tell I do.

    4. Re:This is why... by _Mycroft_VII · · Score: 1

      I don't know who said it was unstable, it has to install to be unstable. I've tried two different versions of mandrake 6.x and 7.x iirc on three different computers and not once got through the installer without it crashing. at least once with a divide by zero error. not flaming but thats been my experience so-far, havent had any trouble with any other distro's I tried so I'm guessing the installer doesn't like somthing in common with my various computers, eigther via chipsets (one socket seven and two socket a's) or the SB Live series of adio cards, all else differs.

      Mycroft

    5. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not an "ubergeek", I just like decent package management!!"

      Then why aren't you using BSD?

    6. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run Solaris 8. Am I a geek?

    7. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me: "make install" is not package management.

    8. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandrake is only unstable if you run it with KDE. Fucking C++.

    9. Re:This is why... by Dri · · Score: 0

      Debian the ubergeeks.
      That's from your point of view. I call myself Ubergeek sometimes and I use Slackware, and most other geeks I know use Slackware. No dull, just Linux. Can't really see why you wanna run RedHat on Servers as all distro exploits always hit that hat first. I've never really spent some time on SuSE but all I've heard is good. Debian? Dunno.

      My 2 cents.

      --
      Girls are strange. They don't come with a man page.
      -- Michael Mattsson
    10. Re:This is why... by mad_clown · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I agree. I get tired of hearing people diss on Mandrake. It's a good distro for the desktop, and they're clearly interested in doing what it takes to get Linux out there and available for the 'average user.' Mandrake is what I use for my desktop distro at home. If i want to run a server here at work, I use Slackware or BSD... but for general "home use" type stuff, for me, at least, Mandrake takes the cake. Kudos to them for making the "right move."

      --
      "Cut word lines. Cut music lines. Smash the control images. Smash the control machine." - William S. Burroughs
    11. Re:This is why... by kikta · · Score: 1

      The VIA chipsets are likely your problem. I've never once had a problem with SB Live. However, Mandrake and VIA have had problems together before (and I've seen that firsthand). Another thing is to make sure you check your md5sums. I couldn't figure out why 8.1 was having weird install problems, then I realized I had forgotten to check the ISO's. Guess what? All three were bad - DOH!

  7. Exactly what inux gaming needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A distribution explicitly targetted at gaming is something that wlll really get gaming jump started. Even if the distro itself isn't used by everyone, it should give developers something to target, and from there other distros can adapt to meet it.

  8. WINE? by Purple_Walrus · · Score: 1

    Oh God! Let us all pray! WINE is great for some stuff but with certain games it just doesn't work or works poorly.

    Oh well, I'll go back to `wine /windows/Unreal/system/unreal.exe` when I can get it to run in full screen mode!

    --
    ------
    Sig
    1. Re:WINE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unreal can be run natively on Linux using Unreal Tournament. Search around on www.linuxgames.com for how to do it.

    2. Re:WINE? by Avakado · · Score: 1

      Running an application in "full screen" is indifferent from running it i windowed mode, from wine's point of view (or at least, can be).

      What you really want is an borderless window, overlapping all other windows and with the same geometry as your screen surface. The first two elements are controlled by your window manager, and the last by unreal itself. So one way to do this is to loose that window manager, and resize you desktop to the gaming resolution of your preference.

      The commands 'vim /etc/X11/XF86Config*' and 'xinit' should get you started.

      --
      The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
  9. Great move by Red+Moose · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This may be a very good thing, if not *the* best thing to happen Linux Distro's in a long time.

    1. People who know what they are doing will build their own customised version from whatever version or distro they downloaded to work from.

    2. I am firmly of the opinion that Linux should stop trying to compete with Windows on Windows's home ground - the office market. Those people are sluggish and resistant to change (we'll see how many even upgrade to Office 2000, not to mind Office XP, or Windows XP)

    3. I think the linux missed out on exploiting a weakness in Windows - gaming - by the OS community concentrating on Windows one-upmanship with StarOffice vs. MS Office, etc., . WIn32 GUI vs. Gnome/KDE (who cares, like I said, people who know what they want will use FVWM if needs be, and the Office-lethargic group will stick with Windows/MS as has been shown).

    Years ago (like 10 maybe) people would say to quit using that Amiga - it's a kid's computer and all you do is games or graphics, etc., . These days the thing that drives PC sales is exactly what MS lackey's would have scorned - games sell new PCs; that Clippy fucker doesn't.

    Linux, if a direction should be made (I realise that that goes against general OS consenus, but I see more inventiveness and ingenuity from the demoscene (the real demoscene) with no OS at all IMHO), should aim to beat Windows at what it's weaknesses are, not by trying to beat it on it's strengths (Office, hardware support....I'd happily buy that one video card supporting everything than have a choice of 50 with shitty support).

    --

    Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

    1. Re:Great move by Vagary · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure Linux will ever be able to compete with Windows on gaming. As much as Linux may be able to run the hardware better, it'll never let games run as free as Win98 does. In this area, you have to choose between security/flexibility (eg : X-windows layers) and performance.

      Right now, the only reason PCs can hold their own against consoles is the ability to upgrade hardware. But once the XBox is out, this advantage may be lost. Linux could end up winning the battle just as PCs loose the war.

      Besides, I'm more productive when I have to dual-boot between work and play. :) I'd rather Linux had solid multimedia than gaming.

    2. Re:Great move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux does have solid multimedia...

    3. Re:Great move by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      That one video card would be the ATI Radeon, for those who don't know.

    4. Re:Great move by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      "I think the linux missed out on exploiting a weakness in Windows - gaming"

      I don't think gaming is Windows' weakness. That's more like its strength, considering how 99% of computer games are coded for Windows, and even cross-platform games are almost always released for Windows first... plus Windows has all the great hardware support you need for gaming.

      Windows games are actually quite stable too, when they're coded right. True, they're not coded right very often, but that's the game developers' fault, not the OS. Crap code is crap code that will crash no matter what OS you're running it on.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    5. Re:Great move by Rzzle · · Score: 1

      >games sell new PCs; that Clippy fucker doesn't. Brilliant! Absolutley hilarious, mod this up!

    6. Re:Great move by geekster · · Score: 1

      Who's to say that the distribution taking over the desktop market has to be anything like a real UNIX system? Someone could make a distribution where everything would be tuned for speed and ease of use, perhaps comprimising security, but as long as it only affects the machine it's running on it's no one's business.

      What I'm trying to say is Linux isn't one thing like windows, linux is (yes, just the kernel I know) a bunch of stuff thrown together and could be made into a system working somewhat like windows. As long as everything is binary compatible everything should be fine, I think.

    7. Re:Great move by Osty · · Score: 1

      I think the linux missed out on exploiting a weakness in Windows - gaming

      Could you please give reasons or cite examples that prove that gaming is a weakness for Windows, rather than a strength? I don't want to get into the "Windows has a bigger market, and so that's the only reason it has a large market for games" argument, as that doesn't address the issue -- specifically, that Windows is technically inadequate for gaming while Linux is technically superior (extrapolating from your statement that gaming is a weakness of Windows, and that Linux should attempt to beat Windows there).


      I'm serious, here. I don't see how you can justify saying that gaming on Windows is a weakness, so please give me reasons. Thanks.

    8. Re:Great move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The compromise between security/stability and performance is one that Linux can win.

      Remember BeOSs never-released implementation of OpenGL? It was stable and about 10% faster than Windows.

      So lets pretend that the BeOS implementation was perfect. Linux has 10% of the Windows speed left for security.

      Fuzzy math, I know. But the Windows openGL isn't the be all and end all of implementations. More to the point - I think Microsoft cripple their OpenGL to promote Direct3D.

    9. Re:Great move by Red+Moose · · Score: 1
      No, I meant in terms of past tense. Before the last 2-3 years and the heavy investment in DirectX, the advent of Windows 95, etc., Linux would have been better off in a direction besides hardcore-compile-your-own, and office. I would have thought that Linux would have been better off if OSS programmers concentrated on creating an equivalent of DX on Linux before Windows/MS ever got around to it. In 1998 OPenGL was still the main 3D API, e.g,. Quake 2, Half-Life, Unreal (I think, but it also used Glide as well).

      For a time, looking back, Windows was aweful for games, and the demise of the home computer market lead to choiceless progression to Windows.

      As it stands right now, no, Windows major major asset is gaming, and I was saying that it is ironic because for years and years I heard "Amiga is for games, get a real computer like a PC", and now the market perspective is exactly that. Windows merely was the choice at the time when the mainstream gaming market was about to boom. If linux had taken that direction things may hav ebeen different.

      The recent article on moving the direction of linux towards an ultimate developer platform may be the next step, but again, MS realises this and is exploiting their ever increasing cement-hold on the industry with the ultimate developer platform being for .NET . So, like business/desktop was the first thing, then gaming, and with it internet, and next with internet comes .NET and solid hold on networks and development.

      Apple were undoubtedly better on the desktop, but lost Amiga, Atari..all the home comps were *the* game machines, they lost too Linux, the real "internet" OS (free, powerful), loses on the next (last?) field.

      I would very much like Linus to quit the reserved crap and get with a decent direction and program objective. MS has created a world dependent on them and as such is difficult ot get rid of (like Alien :) ).

      --

      Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

    10. Re:Great move by benb · · Score: 1

      > Someone could make a distribution where everything > would be tuned for speed and ease of use, perhaps > comprimising security, but as long as it only
      > affects the machine it's running on it's no one's
      > business.

      We are talking about PCs. Their idea is that you can do more than one thing with them.

    11. Re:Great move by MrBogus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You like games, so Windows "major major asset" is games.

      Fred is a DBA, so Windows "major major asset" is DB modeling tools.

      Sally is a project manager, so Windows "major major asset" is project tools.

      Biff is an accountant, so Windows "major major asset" is spreadsheet software.

      Conculsion 1 : Games are just a piece of the puzzle.

      Conculsion 2: Together, Fred, Sally and Biff buy as many games as you do and run them on Windows because that's where the rest of their action is. If another platform (Linux or Amiga) was better for gaming, it still wouldn't be attractive to them.

      --

      When I hear the word 'innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    12. Re:Great move by fault0 · · Score: 1

      that's exactly the reason win2k or winxp doesn't compare to win98 gaming either (in terms of performance).

      so, linux and winxp have similiar footings.

    13. Re:Great move by be-fan · · Score: 2

      That theory would be great if it were true. Because Win98 sucks, Win2k/XP is actually faster in many games these days. In terms of application performance, its faster there too. Direct'ness is out. Todays hardware is very abstracted to begin with, so Win98 DOS'ness really doesn't help. The better VM and I/O management of real 32 bit OSs outweigh any administrative costs.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    14. Re:Great move by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Games score consistantly better in Win98 because of DRIVERS.

      They have existed for a long time for Win98, and are therefore very mature and take full advantage of Win98.

      In a few years, WinXP drivers will be mature, and because of the added improvements in WinXP, will kick the sh*t out of Win98's performance.

    15. Re:Great move by Rix · · Score: 1

      I'd happily buy that one video card supporting everything

      Nvidia has been supporting their cards for quite some time now. Under Mandrake, it's as simple as installing two rpms and a minor change to your X config file.

    16. Re:Great move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Xbox is just another frickin console, and wont change a thing.

  10. Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by cnelzie · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I use Windows Media Player with Wine to watch my...uh...Multimedia Presentations. It really does a decent job with AVI files. I have only tested it with the older non-"themeable" release of Media Player.

    The only problem that I have seen is that sometimes the colors will get messed up. It doesn't always do it with the same file. So, it is not like a perpetual bad coloration from the same file.

    --
    .sig seperator
    --

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not use mplayer, much better. http://www.mplayerhq.hu

    2. Re:Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by Diomedes01 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I use Windows Media Player with Wine to watch my...uh...Multimedia Presentations. It really does a decent job with AVI files. I have only tested it with the older non-"themeable" release of Media Player.

      I've found that mplayer does a really good job of playing mpeg/avi/divx files in Linux.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    3. Re:Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by Ozric · · Score: 2, Informative

      I watch my...uh...Multimedia Presentations with aviplay. It does asf as well. ;)

    4. Re:Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by rgmoore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, they added asf support in the recent 0.9.2 release. You can see it in their release notes here.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    5. Re:Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by Nailer · · Score: 2

      Indeed. But you still need Mplayer for your WMV / Diaskiaud movies. This format is the non streaming version of ASF, and Xine doesn't support it yet.

      When it does, Xine wil rock.

    6. Re:Use this for your...uh...multimedia files. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and aviplay >= 0.6 (from the avifile package) is a lot better than mplayer ;-)))

  11. point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Congratulations, you just figured out why Linux is taking so long to cut into Microsoft's desktop market share: A large number of Linux users are condescending dorks like you.

    1. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 0, Redundant
      A large number of Linux users are condescending dorks like you.

      OK, So perhaps I wasn't as nice as I could have been, but you really should have seen this guy. He really couldn't get his head around the idea that there were other OS's apart from Micro$oft.

      I don't have a problem with gamers using Mandrake, anything which gets Linux onto more machines is fine by be. I just wonder if the gamers know what they are letting themselves in for ?

      My first experiences with Mandrake were not good. It destroyed my Windows partition without warning. (fortunately I had a backup, but this was hardly a user-friendly thing to do).

      My impressions of Linux are that it is a very powerful system, but it doesn't 'suffer fools' if you know what I mean.

      Maybe this gamers Linux will do plenty of hand-holding and have a really easy to use installer. I hope so, or as I mentioned before, the newsgroups will be flooded with newbies whinging about how they trashed their machines.

    2. Re:point-and-drool herds by Diomedes01 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My first experiences with Mandrake were not good. It destroyed my Windows partition without warning. (fortunately I had a backup, but this was hardly a user-friendly thing to do).

      Installing Windows isn't much easier... you still have to create/delete partitions; I have had very good luck setting up friends with Mandrake. Most recently, I set up three friends who live in a house together with a network running Mandrake 8.1 on most of the systems; this distro is very, very nice. Easy to use for newbies, but still configurable for those who know what they're doing. I am very impressed with the hardware support, as well - it even worked out of the box with my Samsung ML-1210 laser printer, which was a gigantic pain in the ass to set up manually even with Samsung's directions.

      I think that this new gaming distribution is a step in the right direction for Linux. The only way that Linux will gain market share as a desktop OS is to cater to desktop users needs. Gamers are a large part of desktop users, probably the largest segment other than business users. The beauty of Free Software is that you can specialize distributions towards different segments very easily.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    3. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you still have to create partitions"

      What was the last version of window you installed?

      Nt 4.0 or something??

      It's all done autmagically now, put in the cd, click ok once or twice, and wait for it to install.

    4. Re:point-and-drool herds by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1
      What was the last version of window you installed?

      Actually, it was Win2K, and you still have to create partitions within the setup program, just as you do in a typical Linux install. God forbid if you're trying to install 95/98; you have to use fdisk, which, AFAIC, is much less user-friendly thana RH or Mandrake install.

      --
      "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
    5. Re:point-and-drool herds by hattig · · Score: 1
      I agree that Mandrake 8.1 is great. I have it running on my old HP Omnibook 4100 with KDE, and the only problem is that I need more memory for KDE to run. Paging with an old laptop HD is not fun... Are there any articles out there on how to optimise KDE (2.2.1) for memory usage?

      It also doesn't support the sound chip inside the laptop, when 7.1 did (in a manner). Have to look into this when I have time and can be bothered...

      Personally, I reckon the only way Linux will be used as a gaming OS if is the games come as bootable DVDs with Linux as the underlying OS the game runs on... and this is an ideal use for Linux (it already has drivers for most graphics and audio chipsets). Performance under gaming still needs some tweaking, but I don't care as I don't play games that often.

      All in all, I would say that Mandrake is the best choice of Linux for a Linux based gaming distribution. However, I would like to see how easy the driver update mechanism is for newer audio/graphics/etc drivers (coming in 2.5 kernel I believe) compared with Windows (even if it does need a reboot). I would also like to see if 100% of current Windows games will run under this WINE based gaming emulation. Maybe the emulation also includes the drivers...?

    6. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't dragonlinux run on a filesystem within fat32? No need for that partition crap

    7. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux isn't that powerful of a system. For a fEW certain tasks, it's excellent. But for a lot of things it isn't perfect. I have seen my Linux box crash, have memory leaks/VM problems and had to deal with other assorted bullshit. I'm not a "fool", either. It's wrong to think LInux and the person using it is better because Linux has it's fair share of problems.

    8. Re:point-and-drool herds by fferreres · · Score: 1

      The only way Linux will be used as a gaming OS if is the games come as bootable DVDs with Linux as the underlying OS the game runs on... and this is an ideal use for Linux

      Haven't you read the latest news? 97% of the games run under Windows with DirectX, which also happens to have the most polished video card drivers.

      The thing is some games are "playable" under Linux so i doubt with see ANY hardcore games running Linux to play games.

      The good point is there are a lot of Linux users that would like to play games, but do NOT want to install Windows (either pirated or original) because we know where that road ends...

      Fede

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    9. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      optimize KDE for memory usage? try running KDE with kicker; kdesktop; exec kwin in your .xinitrc.

      You will lose things like session management, and the sound events, but those are crap anyways. In return, you'll get a desktop that takes very little memory usage. (if you are wondering, kicker is the panel, kdesktop handles the background, and kwin is the window manager).

    10. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually, it was Win2K, and you still have to create partitions within the setup program..."

      And another point alongside that is that XP, the supposed "simplest Windows yet" still has the same 'difficult' (for a newbie) partitioning software as 2000.

      Not to mention the fact that with both 2000 and XP, if you make a FAT partition of 2Gb they will make them FAT16. 32k clusters are a quick way to waste a hard disk...

    11. Re:point-and-drool herds by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      My first experiences with Mandrake were not good. It destroyed my Windows partition without warning. (fortunately I had a backup, but this was hardly a user-friendly thing to do).

      I can beat you on that one. I was installing Mandrake on a test box to see how well WinXP RC2 liked dual-booting, and Mandrake deleted the partition table. When you try and fix that via fdisk and it bombs because the partition table is so badly corrupted, you've moved from "not user-friendly" to downright evil.

      (Actually, it didn't delete the partition table. It wrote it in such a way that the extended partition overlapped with the primary partion. Which is more than enough to throw Partition Magic 6.0 and fdisk for a loop, apparently - enough so that the only solution was to rewrite the table for scratch. Effectively deleting it. Some how, the Linux kernel didn't mind the state of the partition table, though...)

      So, yeah, Mandrake is perfectly capable of screwing up your system and completely screwing up partitions.

      (From now on, I always partition a new system first and then install Mandrake...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    12. Re:point-and-drool herds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, So perhaps I wasn't as nice as I could have been, but you really should have seen this guy. He really couldn't get his head around the idea that there were other OS's apart from Micro$oft.

      Did he insist it was XP? When 90%+ of the public uses Windows they tend to assume that all PCs will be running Windows, especially when an interface looks similar to Windows. Why degrade your co-worker over it? Just mention that it's Linux running KDE and take it from there. He might actually be interested in messing around with it and seeing how easy it is to use. One of the rules of advocacy is to not be a stuck up bastard. Even Linux has its own problems from time to time. We can't stick our heads in the sand and claim superiority while our shit still stinks (so to speak).

    13. Re:point-and-drool herds by BFKeil · · Score: 0

      I had the same experience from the other side. When I tried to install Windows 98 on my Linux box, the fdisk rewrote my partition table in the exact same way (i.e., with extended and primary partitions overlapping). Screwed everything up. From now on, I'll use cfdisk in linux, and then install windows.

      --

      Cheers,
      Benjamin Keil(.sig not yet released to the public)

    14. Re:point-and-drool herds by Groovehead · · Score: 1

      "still has the same 'difficult' (for a newbie) partitioning software as 2000." I didn't find it in the lease difficult. It's pretty much a 'follow the onscreen prompts' type of thing. I'll grant you that all the Linux partitioning utilz that I've seen are MUCH easier, but I still think the XP/2000 "diskpart" utility is a far cry easier than FDISK. Just my opinion...

  12. Silly for the non-nerds by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting idea, and I applaud the developers, but I really think it's not going to make any new Linux users.

    Little Billy gets a new WinXP machine for xmas all ready to run *every* new Windows game with potentially less headaches than keeping a Linux box upgraded with the kernel du jour and the patch of the week.

    Like it or not, Windows Update is much easier to use for the Unwashed Masses than is cvs (now my FreeBSD||OpenBSD bias is showing :))

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by jtra · · Score: 1
      Like it or not, Windows Update is much easier to use for the Unwashed Masses than is cvs (now my FreeBSD||OpenBSD bias is showing :))

      No! MandrakeUpdate or Software Manager (both names refer to same program) is very easy too. (However I cannot compare, I have never used windows update)

      See a slideshow.

      --
      -- Wanna textmode user interface for ruby? http://freshmeat.net/projects/jttui/
    2. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree, the only real way to get to gamers is to start serious devleopment on Linux games. Until there is some steady games released on both platforms I can't see Linux winning in this.

      I do applaud the effort though :)

    3. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by linzeal · · Score: 0

      Ok, I would think that unless a game is released solely on the linux platform that you would have no "mad rush". Killer apps cannot be spread around the various competing Operating Systems or they are not "killer apps".

    4. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by efgbr · · Score: 1

      Well, MandrakeUpdate is at least just-as-easy as Windows Update. And you can assure yourself you're not sending your personal information to a company that wants to control your computer.

      You only go into the kernel and other updates if you want to. I have GNU/Linux set up for a few friends and quite a few don't even know what kernel, rpm and X are. But they sure prefer the system over Windows.

    5. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by GauteL · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about?
      Almost all distributions has nice, simple graphical tools for keeping the distribution updated. Windows is NOT necessarily easier to update than Linux.

      There are _other_ arguments for Linux being to hard for average Joe, but updating isn't one of them.

      CVS is not the way most people update their Linux-boxes.

      Gaute

    6. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by asincero · · Score: 1

      > And you can assure yourself you're not sending
      > your personal information to a company that
      > wants to control your computer

      You don't send any personal information to MS when you use Windows Update either.

      -Arcadio

    7. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by n3m6 · · Score: 2

      more like convince developers to develop both for windows and linux. i know its an extra effort but that's the only way it could start.

      another way is to get hardcore gamers to like linux with games. that way they can b*tch about how linux improved their shooting accuracy. and convince the mass of newbies to just buy linux. even though they'll never use it.

      money drives development (atleast in this case).
      go mandrake!

    8. Re:Silly for the non-nerds by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      I've found the SuSE update quite easy to use. I also have no fear of a BSA gestapo bursting through my door for some "violation of intellectual property". I _never_ use the windows update for fear of how much information is sent and , more importantly, how it will be used, sold, and stored.

  13. Why this is a great idea by MBCook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that one of the things holding Linux back is games. Yes there are some good games, but none of the phenominalo games (such as HL/CS/TFC/etc) are availible, or they come out a year plus later than the Windows version, so most people will have already played it if they're going to. Sure you can buy WineX, but then you have to hope you can set it up correctly. But to bundle that with a great distro like Mandrake (my favorite non-debian distro) is ingenious. To include The Sims is also smart. Good going guys, I look forward to the reviews. Maybe this will help Linux become more mainstream, IMHO. I mean, what's a desktop OS without Counter-Strike? Nothing! He he he.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Why this is a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I mean, what's a desktop OS without Counter-Strike?"

      It's called a 'QuakeStation'. :)

  14. mandrake in games development by hereward_Cooper · · Score: 1

    does this mean that Mandrake might help to port games to linux? It could be good to see a wider range of well known games than just the loki ones.

    H

    --
    zadok.org.uk
  15. Correct! Also! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

    Mandrake also has the WindowsNT Windows 2000 Power user crowd.

    The only thing missing from the power user OS was the games. Power users want their games, well now they have it. Its only a matter of time before millions of windows2k buying Gforce3 using gamers rush the Linux OS.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Correct! Also! by Magila · · Score: 1

      I doubt many Win2k power users are ever going to switch to linux. Like it or not, Win2k is supirior to linux for most power users' needs. It is plenty stable for desktop use (I've only had 3 BSODs in over a year of running Win2k) and has all the hardware and software support a power user could ever need. Until Linux has just as good hardware and software support as Win2k the power users will never touch it. And since we all know linux will never get to that point you can forget about the power users. For me specificaly it's the lack of HPNA 2.0 support and Half-Life which have kept me from switching. Get thoes working under linux just as good as they work under Win2k and I'll start to think about switching, but I'm not holding my breath.

      And yes, I'm aware there isn't much anybody besides Valve and Broadcom can do about it. And no, I don't care about such excuses.

    2. Re:Correct! Also! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      I said this is the first step to solving the software problem.

      The only problem remaining is the hardware.

      Most power users run the same hardware (the best hardware) So this shouldnt be such an issue.

      IF what you say is true, Power users would have never left windows98 for windows2k because windows98 was stable enough, and ran more software, and has better hardware support.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Correct! Also! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      halflife sucks cock. it's based upon a modified quake1 engine.

      and if it's counterstrike that you like, then I'd suggest the Urban Terror mod (www.urbanterror.net) for Quake3. It's graphics are _MUCH_ superior to CS's (mostly because of the engine), and there are almost no cheaters, unlike in CS.

    4. Re:Correct! Also! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 98 was never stable enough for power users. Think multitasking many large programs and development. Half-arsed memory protection just doesn't cut it.

    5. Re:Correct! Also! by andersonjoy1 · · Score: 1

      The difference is, W2K offers 95% of what people wanted in 98. It plays every game currently on the self. It plays quite a few games that were on the self several years ago. It's far more stable than 98.

      If Linux offered full support for every game, the same ease of use as the windows line, and the same type of driver support then people would consider switching primarily to Linux. You can't compare the switch from 98 to 2k to even xp to the switch to Linux.

    6. Re:Correct! Also! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      Win2k wont play the 4th coming.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    7. Re:Correct! Also! by PJ_Hooker · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what HPNA 2.0 is (forgive me), but Half-Life runs almost perfectly in Linux. You can definitely play Half-Life and all its mods in Linux. The only problem is that the menus are a bit slower.

      Oh, and the VoIP with the latest patch still has some issues as far as I know, but I understand crazney is looking into that.

      Check out lhl.linuxgaming.com if you're interested in playing Half-Life and its mods in Linux. It works VERY well. I get performance nearly identical to Windows performance.

  16. Linux vs. Windows Gaming Benchmarks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know of any links to places that show linux vs. windows going head-to-head running games like quake3 on the same hardware to show what performs better?

    1. Re:Linux vs. Windows Gaming Benchmarks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya when xf 4 came out they did a bunch of benchmarks like that, with mandrake i beleive, linux did ok, only like 10-20 fps slower than windows depending on the resolution.

      That was a while ago on some linux news site that has since gone the way of the dotcoms i think.

      Maybe google has a cache i donno.

  17. Well, At Least It's The First Step by robbyjo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Eventhough now it's unimportant to Linux users, it's a milestone! You have already seen how fast Linux grow. Imagine that 5 years from now, Linux will go on par with Windows in gaming. Later on, I expect that game developers will seriously consider Linux as a potential platform for their market.

    --

    --
    Error 500: Internal sig error
  18. the sims? seriously... by laymil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i'm sure they could have come up with a better game to package than the sims...a game that demonstrates the capabilities of the software. however, the biggest mistake here seems to be the lack of an 'gaming expansion pack' sold seperately...i know you can probably download it somewhere, but i think thats what should be on the shelves rather than a 'gaming distribution.' what about the whole already installed userbase? hmm...

  19. Compatibility by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    Do they have a list of current games that work and that dont

    What is theyre compatibility testing strategy for future games and changes in DirectX

    __ and what is this Forms Key : )#()fskdfkls error slashdot keeps on throwing up when i press submit

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  20. sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how is that a troll?

    Sorry to shatter your little open sourcve fantasy with a brick of truth, but games run slower on linux. It's a fact. Come to grip with reality.

    1. Re:sorry by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

      I get 90fps in 1024x768 in Q3 in linux (1.5ghz/256mb/Geforce 2 mx 400 64mb) but in windows it's sluggish sometimes it even drops at around 30...while in linux it never ever drops under 90 (Unless I look into a mirror in the game like the first level)

    2. Re:sorry by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Informative

      What kind of bloat do you have running on that Windows machine? Games typically DO run better on Windows, though there are exceptions. (Quake is NOT by any means one of them).

      HOWEVER, it is well known that Windows does not Multitask well compared to Linux, so anything you have running in the background is going to have some kind of ill effect on your gaming experiences. How ill that effect is depends largely on how powerful your PC is, what type of game you are playing, and what other software you have running.

      Also, if your video card supports T&L, or other really nice very modern features, and the game you are running also supports those features, I seriously doubt Linux gaming performance will even come close to comparing with Windows.

      This isn't even so much a "Can't Do" issue so much as "Just not done yet" issue.

      Fortunately, things like SDL and Mesa are paving the way for this to change. And of course, Wine is getting more mature all the time.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    3. Re:sorry by fault0 · · Score: 1

      it depends on the drivers too. on all benchmarks of Quake3 I've seen, the latest NVIDIA drivers are on par with using latest NVIDIA detno. drivers on win2k, and a bit slower than on win98, but faster than on WinXP.

    4. Re:sorry by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

      Hmm I wondered about that too :) What kind of bloat..hmm I had mIRC, warftp, maybe winamp and you know the usual crap you leave running when you start a game :)
      But when I play Q3 in linux I do leave even mozilla on and nothing is really affecting performance.

  21. Where is it? by Bren · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I checked mandrake's site and transgaming.com but couldn't find any mention of this "gamers distribution" for 69.99 or whatever anywhere. I also checked google but no luck. I would think there would be an announcement since this is supposed to be out in 19 days... anyone have links?

  22. Linux Gaming by recursiv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While this probably comes as good news to some who want to play their windows games on linux, it may not be good news for linux.

    If/when wine gets to a point where it can perfectly emulate 100% of all windows games, there will be no reason for software developers to release any linux games, and linux ends up losing exposre.

    I don't know what will happen, but this is just one possible scenario to think about,

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    1. Re:Linux Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll never happen, as MS continually creates new DirectX APIs. Even if WINE can emulate all Windows games out there today, there will still be more work to do for tommorow.

      Besides. There IS no incentive to release Linux games yet.

  23. How will they call it? by fungus · · Score: 1

    Mandrake Millenium?

    1. Re:How will they call it? by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      No Way.

      It'll be Mandrake XP :)

  24. Not too proud about it by Tams · · Score: 1

    I think that Linux is great the way it is today! The only thing that Linux needs is some great graphical programs like Adobe Photoshop or Jasc Paint Shop Pro. I use dual-boot only because of my family and these programs. IMHO We don't need `user-friendly' and `for-the-masses' distributions. M$ W$ is a toy and a toy if for playing...

    1. Re:Not too proud about it by efgbr · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but "We" don't need it?

      You mean, You don't need it.

    2. Re:Not too proud about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err ...

      Not too sure whether this post was for real, but just in case:

      (a) GIMP - for everything that doesn't require CMYK and colour separations (i.e. you can't publish with the GIMP ... *sigh*)

      (b) COREL Photopaint - v.8 was a free download from COREL (should still be) and was excellent. Sure it's just a bit of winelib porting, but it works fast, smoothly and doesn't crash! Obviously, being part of the CORELDraw suite it fully supports CMYK and will print out your colour seps as good as gold. Personally, I have used it to prep images for scientific journals, so it works for me.

      If they don't satisfy your graphic needs then nothing around today will! I mean - Paint Shop Pro!! Don't make me laugh .... :P

  25. Awesome, but ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 1, Interesting

    - All the sales of all Linux Games are dwarfed by
    the sales of a single, average, Windows game

    - While commercial Linux 2d games are generally more stable than their Windoze counterparts, there are still a lot of problems in the 3d area, and the future is bleak (VA layoffs, etc.)

    Anyway, it's a good step forward, even though it might not be a commercial success.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Awesome, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhhh, don't admit that 3d games on linux are really weak, you'll got modded a troll.

      Don't you know you're supposed to pretend linux is superior?

    2. Re:Awesome, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually -- if you combine Civ:CTP and Myth 2's sales, they outsold Heretic 2 on Windows -- and if you count the firesale sales, the total units shipped break 100K (boosted mainly by the Q3 fiasco) -- which would, combined, be respectable sales for a Windows title (nothing groundbreaking, of course).


      Personally, I think that Loki pursued the wrong market -- too much 3D, not enough strategy games (which did better, anyways). If they'd grabbed one of the good RPGs (Fallout 2, Nox, Arcanum), they might even still be announcing new titles that aren't one-off gimmicks.

  26. Bootable Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the need to do is take something (probably linux) and have games so that they have their own OS, and the users would just boot the disk to play - the initial set-up would be a pain if the video card isn't supported or something (so don't use solaris ;) ) but it should work well...

  27. There would be reason! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    Transgaming would be making money off of their games thats the reason.

    They'd be better off selling linux games for $20 extra and getting the money transgaming is getting than having people buy windows games and running it on linux. You see they want you to buy the game twice because they make double the money.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. TransGaming's DirectX layer for Linux by falser · · Score: 3, Informative

    Refer to the slashdot article about it:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/14/131824 6&mode=thread

    I'd rather just purchase that, and be able to install it in my choice of distribution.

    1. Re:TransGaming's DirectX layer for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      purchase? just download WineX... exellent software, runs Starcraft, Diablo ][ (needs no-cd crack to run, the copy protection doesn't like wine), and R.T.C. Wolfenstein (before a linux client was available) flawlessly

  30. Re:Interesting review by Vagary · · Score: 0, Troll

    That article is an awfully subtle joke, it took me a while to realise that no one could possibly make that many mistakes. :)

  31. A message to TransGaming. by jfisherwa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Linux, being free, wants to be free. Don't force people to buy it.

    "The Sims" won't be free anytime soon, so here is my humble idea for making this successful:

    They create a 'standard' game/application management and installer program for these type of applications. The entire package as a whole can be compatible with the standard add/remove for a distro, but to control the contents requires using its own tools.

    They distribute the application manager/control panel part for free, and keep it opensource. An installer kit is developed *specifically* for installing these type of packages, which is also kept open. Anyone can go out and buy a game, get it to work, and create an 'installer' and distribute this freely to whomever they want.

    License "The Sims" from Maxis for a reduced cost - 30-50% of MSRP. Include a single "Transgaming Kit," either in the box for The Sims or as an extra shrink-wrapped CD + manual on the outside (think magazines that come in plastic bags with posters and CDs) - the kit contains a distro, packages to install their application/game management on any of the popular distros, and the installer to install "The Sims" into their application/game management system. They sell this for the regular cost for The Sims +10-20%.

    What if you already own The Sims? IANAL, but you shouldn't have to purchase it again. You download the toolkit for free, and if someone has freely released an installer for The Sims, you're in luck -- for free. If there isn't, or you don't want to go through the trouble, you go to their web site and pay them .. $4.95 - $9.95? You receive two things: the installer for The Sims and a coupon for $2.95 - $8.95 off your next purchase of a full-packaged game from TransGaming -- the goal being that if you do purchase another game from them, that installer kit download ultimately only cost you $2 - $3.

    This will encourage repeat business and allow them to recover some logistical/management costs without stifling the freedom of free software.

    Many gamers use Linux at work, at home, but don't use it for games because it often won't run the games we want to play. If I were to pick up a game, and TransGaming could atleast compete in price for these new releases, I would purchase from them *just to support the cause* - regardless of whether I planned to play it on Linux. Why not? Their price competes. They get to keep things flowing. I get the same package either way, but now I also get the kit that will allow me to easily play it in Linux without killing myself.

    ..

    But please, do not sell full-priced distributions with every copy of a game that you release. You're only doing this to justify the cost, not as a true value-add. How many of us are going to dump our current setup just to install that special gaming edition distro? 5%? How much of that full price are you trying to justify as being for "that special gaming distro?" 50%?

    IANABM. (.. .. business major)

    Good luck,
    Jason

  32. Re:This is GREAT!! [maybe] by nocomment · · Score: 0
    Remember making the mass public think something for the quick sale is usually not a good idea

    "Amiga's are only good for games, and video taster" i'd hate for the word amiga to be substituted with linux, although i am happy to see this as well, i thik it will be tough to maintain the lines, and pay attention to when the tide is starting to shift into a "linux is only for games" mode by the mass-at-large....

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  33. Re:What the fuck is wrong with slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they realize when a major site runs on eopn source software it only makes open source look good if the site is STABLE.

    Oh ya MySQL is great, alot of companies use it in mission critical environments.

    oh like who?

    Well slashdot uses it!

    Good way to get people to avoid open source...

  34. I don't know which is funnier... by Blaede · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...the Linux jihad complaining that Windows users can't see the light about Linux, or the other Linux jihad complaining that now all these Windows users will start using Linux!

  35. This will benefit from low-latency patches by Joe+Groff · · Score: 1
    With the new low-latency and preemption patches being worked into the kernel (mentioned recently on Slashdot), this could be a great leap forward for Linux gaming and multimedia in general. We could soon see Linux games outperforming Windows (especially with all the added bloat^Wfeatures Windows XP adds). If Mandrake and Transgaming do this right, this could finally be Linux's big break into desktop space.

    (OT: What the hell is an "Invalid form key"? Is anybody else getting this?)

    --

    -Joe

  36. linux is the SUPER ULTIMATE OS EVER!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think taco should code in a new category in mod.

    -1, the truth.

    Since on slashdot truthful statements are usually mislabeled troll.

    I agree anything that exposes the true shortcoming of linux should be censored via moderation but lets mod it properly, -1 the truth is what those statements deserve.

    I mean if we mod down any posts that admit linux has some problems, those problems will just disappear and no longer plague linux. Of course the best way to avoid problems is to ignore them. Discussing problems never helps,just pretend they don't exist thats the best solution to anything.

    So taco think you could handle adding that to the code you dumb monkey?

  37. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

    Slow Down Cowboy!

    Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

    It's been 12 seconds since you hit 'reply'!

    If you this error seems to be incorrect, please provide the following in your report to SourceForge:

    * Browser type
    * User ID/Nickname or AC
    * What steps caused this error
    * Whether or not you know your ISP to be using a proxy or some sort of service that gives you an IP that others are using simultaneously.
    * How many posts to this form you successfully submitted during the day

    * Please choose 'formkeys' for the category!
    Thank you.

    Invalid form key!

    Invalid form key: AqKVkQ40LN !

    If you this error seems to be incorrect, please provide the following in your report to SourceForge:

    * Browser type
    * User ID/Nickname or AC
    * What steps caused this error
    * Whether or not you know your ISP to be using a proxy or some sort of service that gives you an IP that others are using simultaneously.
    * How many posts to this form you successfully submitted during the day

    * Please choose 'formkeys' for the category!
    Thank you.

  38. Public Service Announcement by PurpleBob · · Score: 0, Troll

    For those who haven't figured it out, adequacy.org is a troll site.

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  39. Surely some mistake by Derwen · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...Mandrake ... aimed at gamers .. released on November 9

    I tried out Mandrake a couple of years ago and it already shipped with BSDgames and several versions of Tetris.

    Sheesh. What more could anyone possibly want?

    - Derwen

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
  40. Re:the sims? seriously... by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    It brings a game that is a best seller to the linux platform that the average Joe (and some geeks) actually like to play. It is not a matter of us the /. crowd wanting to install Diablo II and Starcraft on our 31337 boxes; it is a matter of bringing this to the average Joe so that the game works and is worth the $69.99 USD that he paid for it.

    I for one am *so* glad to see The Sims pre-bundled; my girlfriend now can stop making the following excuse: "I'm sticking with Windoze because I can't play The Sims on it." ;-)

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  41. Fark -- not enough use of the preview button. by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    Let me correct "the excuse" for you all; it brings some confusion.

    "I'm sticking with Windoze because I can't run The Sims on Linux."

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  42. OT: Invalid form key by jtra · · Score: 1
    OT: What the hell is an "Invalid form key"? Is anybody else getting this?

    Yes. I got it too.

    --
    -- Wanna textmode user interface for ruby? http://freshmeat.net/projects/jttui/
  43. Whats a desktop w/o CounterStrike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My desktop.
    I hate playing CS. I really like it when it was Beta6, Beta7, etc...but then cheaters came...
    Sorry, but CS is dead for me.

    1. Re:Whats a desktop w/o CounterStrike? by fault0 · · Score: 1

      redundant, but try the quake3 urban terror mod (http://www.urbanterror.net)

      cs, without the annoyances (better graphics, animiation, and modelling, based upon the quake3 engine, not the ancient halflife engine), and best yet, no CHEATERs. Apparently, id cares more about fixing cheating than Valve does :).

  44. Re:Big Deal by blwrd · · Score: 1

    Well, if we want linux "make it" to massmarket. This is really something that we need, "plug-n-play games". Yes, you can install winex by yourself, and propably all the orher packeges that come with this new mandrake. But how many can do it just in few minutes, there is always lots of configuration when installing stuff.
    How unattractive it sounds; but if you would just combine window$ (simple) usability with Linux stability and configurability (with all the API supports) ...

    Linux really needs something like OSX, so incredible GUI and applications (and support!), that everything you want to do, you can just do it as "point and click".
    .. of course people that don't want those automatically installed guis and want to configure everything by themselfs can still install e.g slackware and install all the components they want..

    And about that emulation; yes, the idea sucks ;) What really would own, would be API that has support both in windows, linux, mac etc. Maybe something that would be almost compatible with directx, so that games would be relatively easy to port to it..

    - b

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Finally by ahoehn · · Score: 1

    I've developed a deep hate for microsoft, but never had the juevos to give up most of my games and switch completely to linux, if this distro is everything promised, it could make that decision alot easier, for me and tons of other people like me.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    1. Re:Finally by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. A good working WINE IS the windows killer everyone's been waiting for. Now there needs to be just ONE more microsoft screw up in the XP code. somebody make a killer outlook 6 only virus or something. Watch the sheep come join Linux.

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  47. Re:the sims? seriously... by BlueSD · · Score: 1

    I agree that it is crazy, but The Sims has been on the top 10 selling games list, if not the top slot (When D2 or Max Payne wasn't : ), since it came out... what, almost 2 years ago? Bundling the most user friendly "desktop" distro with one of the best selling games of all time can't be a bad thing. Furthermore, allowing me (even the possibility of one day, in the not too distance future) to able to play all my games, do the occasion office task, and check email/surf makes... me warm and fuzzy. I love linux and the whole concept (http://www.kmfms.com/), but until it can do gaming to even a comparable level as WinDoze, I'm stuck with multi-boot. Another example of this... Even now, with XP lumbering out of the gates, I still only use XP(Win2k) occasionally because Win98 still plays _all_ my games faster and more reliably. Sure, I love being able to End Task in XP if a game actually (rarely) does happen to crash, but not everything works in 2K/XP. Dark Age of Camelot is a perfect example... I don't want to use 12.41 when I can use the new DetonatorXP (12.85, for Quake 3) just because 12.8x causes a blue screen on exit of DAoC. Please, please give me a linux desktop (distro)that isn't butt slower than XP/98 on the desktop for surfing, mp3s, multitasking... then add a DirectX layer / wine emulation for mainstream gaming... and I can finally go to one OS. Hell, I can use VMware for any other tasks that require, and are suitable for doing so, on a XP virtual machine! Peace

  48. Troll report! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    (Insert Flame Here)

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  49. What about multimedia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Games and multimedia are the two primary reasons I still use Windows, but I could easily lay off the games. I'd like to see an equivelent to VirtualDub for Linux. THAT would be truly great.

    1. Re:What about multimedia? by merbywerby · · Score: 1

      Well with Xtheater and gtv you can watch mpegs
      divx and avi's. checkout xtheater.sourceforge.net for the xtheater

    2. Re:What about multimedia? by fault0 · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about multimedia editing, not viewing.

  50. Re:the sims? seriously... by laymil · · Score: 1

    so...basically she has to buy the game again? thanks for supporting my point.

  51. Linux isnt free, Information is. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    You should BUY linux, however once you buy something you should OWN it.

    This means you have the right to do whatever you want to it because the source code is now owned by you!

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  52. Re:What is wrong with slashdot? by BlueSD · · Score: 1

    Yikes! I wish this wasn't so true... I wonder if maybe the problem could be server or bandwidth related and not the software driving SD?? It's been like this for months now... wasn't always.

  53. Hooked! by fktup · · Score: 1

    Hey,

    Have you been living in a cave or do you really not like GIMP? After all it was the original killer app for linux. Out of the little buttons they coded for the interface GTK grew out of GTK GNOME out of GNOME...

    I'm still waiting for the killer audio app ardour(http://ardour.sourceforge.net) to start maturing.

    On the topic of games. I like WineX pretty soon everything I play will run well enough under it and I wont have to waste an entire partition to play a couple games and watch demos from the demo scene. The worst part is is that it's the first partition on the disk which is the fastest and the best for swap and music file storage.

    *sigh*

  54. Technical suitability isn't any better. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

    There's a difference between technical suitability and marketplace suitability. Windows gets the games first because it's a big market. It's a big market because it gets the games first. Round and round it goes - infinite recursion without a base case. From a technical standpoint, it's not very good at all for games.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the reason for gaming getting big on pc's was that they got a soundcard, befor that it was only the internal speaker and amiga was the game king...

      with the ability to play as good music as the amiga finaly and then the same level of graphical goodnes and the fact that you have harddrives from the start instead of the disk drive of the amiga you get the market!

      and ms have done its best to hold on to it...

      whne the win95 slowed down games they came with directx, just to make shure noone stayed behind in dos world...

      now directx is what is holding mutch of the gaming comunity up as its easyer to just code for it instead of having to code directly to hardware...

      only time will tell of they discover sdl and the ease of porting games with it, as you can code with it as a base and have multisystem supprot with just a recompile, nothing more:)

    2. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by MrBogus · · Score: 2

      infinite recursion without a base case.

      Uhh - MS Office?

      It seems to be the outlook of the "gamer" community that most games are purchased by "gamers. It's not true -- the PC game market is driven by normal people who do normal things on their computers and blow off steam with the occasional game. The "base case" is that the environment is attractive without the games, which are almost entirely a secondary market. (Of course, people seem to forget that, which is why hardware requirements have pushed the PC game market into the toilet.)

      In other words, games won't bring about Linux users. Linux users will bring about the games.

      --

      When I hear the word 'innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    3. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, hence the best selling games. The Sims, Rollercoaster Tychoon, etc. These games stay in the top 10 for months- the games that power gamers rave about are lucky to stay there for more than two weeks.

    4. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even games like HalfLife and Unreal Tournement that notibly do not require hardware accelleration.

    5. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by be-fan · · Score: 3

      Actually, Windows 2000 is VERY suitable for games. Why? I thought you'd never ask:

      1) Kernel tuning: The Win2K Pro kernel isn't a server kernel gussied up for the desktop. It shamelessly gives heavy preference to the foreground application (screw UNIXy ideals of "fairness") and gives boosts to media-oriented processes over other types of processes. For example, reading for a sound device gives you thread an 8 point temporary boost in priority while reading from disk gives you a 2 point boost.

      2) DirectX: Still unmatched by any other multimedia API on the planet. Maybe OpenGL 2.0 + OpenML + OpenAL could kick its ass, but I have yet to see such a combo in use. What really sucks about Linux multimedia is the situation with audio. ALSA is great, but nothing really uses it that much. Then you have the brain-dead aRts and esound scheme which take a trip down memory lane to software mixing...

      3) Hardware. Not only does Windows support more hardware, but it supports it better. More acceleration gets used and more features are implemented.

      4) Simplicity: Packages don't work for gaming systems. While packages are nice in theory, RPM (I don't have much experience with Debian, but it isn't a player in this market anyway) sucks monkey balls when it comes to keep track of applications. I have yet to go through DLL-hell in Windows, but everytime I want to upgrade something, RPM puts me through a giant dependency chase/conflict resolution. urpmi is shaping up to be pretty great, but its still not there yet. For example, it often installs cruft that are supposedly dependencies for an app, but the app doesn't actually *require* them (the package maker thought they'd be nice to have).

      Of course, Linux technically has a lot of advantages too. Its got a killer VM/IO system, and new memory hungry games can use that. It has great latency (with the new patches) which is good for audio. With a few tweeks (and a lot of changes to developer methodology) Linux could become more suitable for games than Windows. But it isn't right now.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      One thing that has annoyed me is that these games that require hardware accelleration don't actually *look* any better. It seems to me that they are using the accelleration not to make a better game, but to reduce the workload of the programmers so they don't have to write 'tight' code. (It's the typical situation: hardware is cheaper than programmer time - so go ahead and write inefficient code and just increase the hardware requirements. End result - we buy better and better hardware but don't see any real benefit from it.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    7. Re:Technical suitability isn't any better. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3
      About the only thing you mention that was a technical issue was point #1 - the kernels. Everything else is a marketplace issue. DirectX is NOT better than openGL, but it has more proliferation, and therefore coding to it gives you access to more types of hardware. Windows hardware support is also due to marketplace, given that Microsoft doesn't do the work to support the hardware, the HARDWARE vendor chooses to do the work to support Windows. The OS itself can't do a damn thing to fix the "I don't feel like supporting you because you are a small market" problem. The package issue has nothing to do with the package technology itself and everything to do with the decision of which packages to include on the installation media. Windows games always come bundled with the libraries they use, like DirectX, in case you don't have them installed already, or your installed version is too old. This is, again, a marketplace issue, NOT a technical one.

      The really big problem is social rather than technical. There's this recursion that it's very hard to break out of - Linux distro's won't be popular until they have the features that are aimed at joe average. But they won't put in such features until it becomes popular with joe average. (until then the linux market, consisting mostly of technical types, doesn't care about those features and often thinks of them as a detriment.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  55. SDL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well done, you've just described SDL.

  56. I thought I was the only one seeing the formkeys b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You saved my sanity. Someone else saw it also.

    Thank you AC MAN!

  57. True Ubergeeks compile their software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Yes.. True Ubergeeks run distros like Slackware or Gentoo and compile their own damn packages!

  58. Good by Ybrog · · Score: 1
    You know, there is a good percentage of the "windoze using public" who don't use Linux
    because it doesn't provide any benefit other than saying, "I'm using Linux."

    Before those you ridicule can be ready for Linux, they need to educate themselves or have someone else teach them about it.

    Any effort to get more people interested is a good effort in my opinion, not because MS products are, well, terrible, but because competition is a good thing.

    --

    bleh

  59. Eh? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    There I was thinking that Mesa was a slow software implementation of OpenGL, which I had to spend hours picking out of my system before I could get my NVidia hardware OpenGL drivers to work properly.

    Maybe that was a different Mesa. Maybe I'm just plain wrong. My memory isn't what it used to be...

    1. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my drivers working by doing a make install as root. Took me about 10 seconds.

  60. Mandrake for gamers by hidden+vampyre · · Score: 1

    One of the main reasons that I have kept my box running win98 (because I can't afford a second computer such that 1 box runs linux and the other runs win for gaming) is because the games I like to play are made for windows OSs'. This news makes me very happy. So really, I have nothing intelligent to say about this Mandrake for gamers so I will just keep it simple:

    wOOt!!

  61. Mandrake/Gamers Running on Athlox XP 1800+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be an AWESOME promo!!!

  62. Extending the distro wars by (startx) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    REAL Uber-geeks use slackware!

    (What does Invalid form key: gnhJOrlDvl mean?)

  63. Stop stroking yourself in public. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a bunch of self-aggrandizing pseudo-elitist bullshit.

  64. Anton, The Computer Guy from SNL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anton, you sound just like the condscending dorky Computer Guy from Saturday Night Live. Hork! Hork! Hork!

  65. I don't know which is dumber... by Lord+Vipor+Scorpion · · Score: 1

    Microsoft tactlessly calling their marketing campaigns "jihads" OR TexasFury here ascribing that kind of offensiveness to the Linux community's ambivalence about improving gaming by hacking the Windows versions.

    SNL's Will Ferrell's GWB: "Don't mess with Texas!"

  66. Re:Mandrake is Going Bankrupt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dork. Oh... that's as in uninformed.

  67. Linux is only free if your time is worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is only worthless if your time is free.

  68. You forgot a 3rd choice... by Blaede · · Score: 1

    ..., your own sheer idiocy. Obviously, you paid no heed to the fact about how I observered one camp of Linxers complain about Windows being 'sheep', and the other complains that the 'sheep' will now start using Linux. Then again, when an idiot. always an idiot (just like the parable of the scorpion, the frog, and the river). But you make me laugh heartily, as all fools make me want do. Don't ever change, sweet lad, the world needs people like you to laugh at.

  69. Beginning of a GOOD viscious circle... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1

    Not only will this benefit home users who want to play games, but it will offer arguably the first Linux games and multimedia standard to work with. This will be GREAT for developers, who not only won't have to go through several days' worth of download and internetial documentation searching in order to get their machine ready to develop games for, but also to ensure that all these developers are working from a similar base, which will help reduce dependency issues.

    Hopefully they'll talk it out with some of the prominent developers out there too, including some in the open source world. I'm probably going to get my hands on this, not just for the included games, but the possibility that downloading other free games will be made easier.

    (sorry if this got posted more than once, I'm getting weird formkeys errors...)

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Beginning of a GOOD viscious circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whoa! How in the world is standardizing on the Windows API good for Linux multimedia? (Oh, and there's a perfectly good Linux standard already -- SDL, which was used for all of Loki's work.)

      WINE's install is fairly straightforward, but it distributes many, many shared libraries into its target directory. You might want to rethink how heavy its dependencies are -- one screwup, and the whole install is pretty much toasted, and you have all these extra libraries to guess about when trying to cleanup. (And that's skipping the performance, which is usually a little flaky and noticably slower than when run under straight Windows -- or, if you have a normal (non-DirectX) app, under Win4Lin or VMWare.)

      Oh, and just for the record, it's "vicious" :-)

  70. wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    macs run on different architecture all together..

  71. Re:sorry - Windows does multitask just fine. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    Thats why I run a dual cpu winxp box. I can run IRC/Winamp/SSH/Xwin/email/xwin in the background, and it doesnt take any cpu time away from my counterstrike or tribes. In fact, I dont even reboot anymore. I dont even close tasks for memory, I just load a game and play. I still get 60+fps

    WinXP cleartype and stability make it a perfect workstation. *Note I didnt say server, nothing beats *nix for a server.

    --
    If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. - Abraham Maslow

  72. Re:commander faggot sucks at programming by yoinkslap · · Score: 0

    "...excuse me for being...a braindead open source chimp..." youre excused.

    --
    Dont ask me...Im just the bass player.
  73. Re:sorry - Windows does multitask just fine. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    A dual system to do all that? A bit excessive, perhaps. It really shouldn't take a dual system for all of that.

    I tend to get a quite a bit out of just a Pentium III 800, but this is all beside the point.

    The things I run in the background are not CPU demanding, and they go into Wait status pretty quietly. (Explorer uses hardly any CPU time if it's not actively doing anything, and that's true for WinAMP, Outlook, ICQ, AIM, AVG, etc... basically anything most people are likely to be running)

    But even if MS Operating Systems DO perform "Well enough", the point I was trying to make originally is that the level of multitasking they perform isn't really on the level of Unix. It's certainly not as efficient, and it's definately not preemptive.

    But yes, I certainly agree that Windows XP makes a great Workstation OS; Windows 2000/XP is a serious improvement over the previous Windows 95/98/SE/ME ...

    Windows is becoming stable. Linux is gaining viability as a gaming platform. Pretty soon the merits of one over the other will be judged less over technical features and more over such things as cost and legalities.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  74. Mandrakesoft CEO expects 99% linux marketshare ! by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is an interesting transcript of a chat with Jacques Le Marois, head of Mandrakesoft. Most of his 44 answers are predictable but I didn't expect that he would predict a 99% market share for linux on the PC in the next years !(with 20% or 30% for mandrake)

    Yes 99 percent !

    The text is in french but I used this excellent translation engine and mirrored the original translation.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  75. Leopard show his spots... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    "I just like decent package management!!" tells ME you are already there, my friend..;)

  76. Interesting subscription service from transgaming by clarkie.mg · · Score: 2, Informative

    It will start october 22. From their website :

    TransGaming's subscription services will be available in fall 2001. For just $5 a month, subscribers will be able to directly support our work on Wine and will be able to vote on which games we should work on next. We want you to be a full participant in the development process, not just an innocent bystander!

    Once 20,000 subscribers are signed up, TransGaming will release all its current code under the Wine license. In many ways, TransGaming subscription model is an economic experiment in novel mechanisms for funding Open Source projects. For more insight, please have a look at our Open Source Philosophy.

    If you are interested in subscribing, please fill out our Survey, and we'll get back to you when our code is ready for widespread public consumption.


    Interesting, yes but 5$ each month just to vote ...

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  77. Re:Big Deal by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

    Linux really needs something like OSX, so incredible GUI and applications (and support!), that everything you want to do, you can just do it as "point and click".
    .. of course people that don't want those automatically installed guis and want to configure everything by themselfs can still install e.g slackware and install all the components they want..


    In short, Linux needs to drop X.

    Hmm, it sure would be nice if Apple would port Aqua to Linux (or, better yet, open source it).

  78. Market Share by dorzak · · Score: 1

    Actually a lot of things I have seen indicate that Linux may be slightly ahead of Mac.

    A lot of the pro-Mac numbers talk about "total Macs" sold since 1984. Well, I can tell you that probably at least half of those are not gaming machines, and that is just my own idea of seeing them, minus about half to keept it a safe figure.

    On desktop, they are probably slightly ahead. But overall, I am not so sure.

  79. Free software replaces office apps by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Fred is a DBA, so Windows "major major asset" is DB modeling tools.

    Recent Oracle clients run on Java technology. Java technology runs on Linux86; Fred can download a Linux version of the SDK or the smaller JRE.

    Sally is a project manager, so Windows "major major asset" is project tools.

    She can use MrProject or Toutdoux.

    Biff is an accountant, so Windows "major major asset" is spreadsheet software.

    Like Gnumeric?

    The situation with office apps does not parallel like the situation with Photoshop vs. GIMP. Most office suite users do not need the "high-end features" that Microsoft pushes on users with each new relea$e. Even then, those who clone MS Office don't have to worry about broad color-correction patents that play a significant part in keeping GIMP from matching Photoshop's feature set.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Free software replaces office apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the situation exactly parallels Photoshop versus GIMP -- for each category of software - (Database / Project / Accounting), there's a low-end commodity market segement usually dominated by Microsoft. Then there's specialized, usually Windows-only, packages that cost thousands of dollars.

      (DB Tools maybe being the big exception because that market is very java-friendly.)

  80. Well, they weren't Tetris(tm) by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I tried out Mandrake a couple of years ago and it already shipped with BSDgames and several versions of Tetris

    Mandrake has never shipped with a Tetris brand product. The Tetris Company has not licensed the TETRIS trademark for software running on any POSIX system. Of course, the Windows 3.1 Entertainment Pack (which contains an outdated version of Tetris) will probably run under Wine, and Mandrake shipped with a lot of independently produced falling tetramino games (i.e. clones of Tetris).

    If you really want an innovative tetrisclone, don't spring for Tetris Worlds on GBA. Get TOD: Tetanus On Drugs. Source and Windows binaries are included; DOS and Linux binaries are just a recompile away.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Well, they weren't Tetris(tm) by tmuka · · Score: 1

      I dont know about the legal ownership of the name brand tetris, but i can tell you for a fact that Mandrake since at least version 7.2 comes with a Tetris clone called gtetrinet that allows standard style, and network enhanced multiplayer tetris that is rather addictive...

  81. Use the Allegro library by yerricde · · Score: 1

    What really would own, would be API that has support both in windows, linux, mac

    You mean like the Allegro library? It's like SDL but it has primitives (line, rect, circle, etc. make retro wireframe games easier) and a simple GUI layer, and your games will run on windows, linux, beos, mac os, and even DOS.

    Durn form keys... Over a dozen bugs have already been filed at sourceforge for this issue.
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  82. This is not really a great thing. by memyselfandmyhand · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Games do not run as well under wine as they do nativly. There are graphics glitches, and countless flaws that cause problems. People will go out and buy windows games, and find that they run slowly, or badly, and assume it's just because Linux is terrible at games. This will also deter companies from porting to Linux because the games already run under wine.

    BUT, native Linux games do run really well. All the native Linux games I've played (Quake1,2,3, Tribes2, UT, sof, etc) run really well. As for raw framerate, they are about the same (In heavy benchmarks Linux scores roughly 10% higher, but this isnt that noticeable in real gameplay). The benefits come from things like loading time, etc. Starting quake3, loading levels, etc run 3-4 times faster in linux than in windows, and it also handles heavy loads a lot better. It just overall feels more responsive.

    So while wineX is a good way to increase linux gaming support, it will not really make developers port there games to linux.

  83. Hmm by jrockway · · Score: 2

    I'll probably get modded down for this, but it needs to be said:

    I really don't care if Linux is accepted as a desktop OS. It works great for me now. X, Emacs, and TeX are all I need anyway. What else could you want?

    --
    My other car is first.
  84. Winning our own race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. I think the linux missed out on exploiting a weakness in Windows - gaming - by the OS community concentrating on Windows one-upmanship with StarOffice vs. MS Office, etc., . WIn32 GUI vs. Gnome/KDE (who cares, like I said, people who know what they want will use FVWM if needs be, and the Office-lethargic group will stick with Windows/MS as has been shown).


    Actually, there is nothing at all wrong with the effort on StarOffice/OpenOffice. I think it should continue, and I have some good reasons that have nothing to do with duplicating MS Office.

    The single greatest feature of free/open software is that any competent person can add the features s/he needs. Having all of the basic components gives a lot of people a platform to build upon. In the case of office suites, this is the place where localization into minority languages is most likely to take place. MS is not interested in tiny markets. That lack of interest is only going to hasten the decline of many languages. It doesn't take a market of millions for free/open tools to get localized into those languages. In fact, I suspect that a dedicated group of less than a dozen programmers who know a language can do it.

    When we look at the bigger picture, we have the capacity to create a target that can never be pinned down. The reason lies in the Bazaar that ESR referred to in his essay. With a large enough number of people, all addressing their own problems, scratching their own itches, we can have software that solves an enormous number of unusual problems.

    Free software/open source will win the race by defining it. And the definition will be simply the answers to the question, "What have we made it do today?" We won't beat Microsoft, any more than Microsoft beat IBM. Microsoft defined a market and won it.

    Frankly, I don't mind if Microsoft does well. In fact, given the inter-dependencies in the stock markets, I hope they do. I just want software that solves my problems. It seems that I keep having to build it. So long as there are millions of people who want what open/free software provides, it won't die. That's what I care about.
  85. You're right! by andersonjoy1 · · Score: 1

    I am a W2K power user. I love my games and hot hardware (GF3). I've been geeky my whole life. I've played w/ many distro's of Linux and it is fun to play w/, but for me it's not a desktop replacement. W2K offers better driver support, easier/quicker updates and installs to get back to the reguler stuff, 99.5% of games are Windows only. Wine is nice and it does run a lot of stuff, but not w/ the reliability and ease of use of just running windows. Linux is still doomed to sit on the 2nd hard drive of many geeks, and nowhere near Joe Intel. And run mainly by a few M$ hating "I'm better/smarter than you because I run Linux." types. I'm not saying that's how all Linux users are. Like I said Debian is sitting on my second hard drive w/ a few bios clicks to run it. However, W2K offers EVERYTHING I need so day to day that's where I'll stay. If I feel like playing around, I'll switch over and run Linux for a few hours until the urge for some CS hits.

  86. Gaming spreads OS !!! Personnal History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I first came to IBM PC in order to play Ultima VII
    All other motivation was just some excuses !!!
    And at that time, I was using a C64.
    So when I take My IBM 386sx25 with a hidden dos and a graphic interface that prevents you to do ohter thing than lotus 1-2-3.
    I had a hard time.
    Remember, Ultima VII needs near 600 Ko of the famous 640 ko (thanks bill for the :'we'll never need more'), and use of paging memory, a EMM386 story...
    I totally srcew up the install, resinstall Dos, learn dos, learn driver management, learn memory management (this was because programmers rarely make user manual, they make developper manual...)
    And after 3 days without sleeping, I manage to play to Ultima VII. And it was great !
    My friends also go to PC world bevause of games, Monkey island was a goo motivation, for example...
    Look at what OS has the more games... And what OS has everything to be on top, but doesn't spread...

    All ways that can give us games on linux are good !! All !
    And because gamers are tweakers (do you know quake mods ? they are written in quake-c often by people that didn't program at all !), Linux will gain much, much of this communauty !!
    Just remember :
    GAMES IS THE FUTURE OF THE HUMANITY !!!
    (As work will be for the robots, and sex cannot be the meaning of a life...)
    Okay, meanwhile, we'll have to do a certain revolution to kick ass of rich, powerful people that think they ca master our lifes... without asking us.. But It'll come !!

    A windows gamer, A linux programmer, a life enjoyer !

  87. Re: Run CS Under Wine it works good for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I run Coutnerstrike under the debian unstable snapshots of wine. There is a howto out there. Check out lhl.linuxgames.com

  88. Michael is at it again! by Michael+The+Nifty · · Score: 1

    Talking about shiny new games and geek toys in the same sentence as mentioning November 9th! Don't you know that Europeans write the day before the month, you heartless moron! I'm sure that the French will be more busy to mop up what'll be left of the Tour Montparnasse than to drool over the new Mandrake release.

    1. Re:Michael is at it again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

  89. The Sims exist on Linux natively by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Yea, it is "unbeliavable" but a sims executable for Linux already exist.

    What happened to it is Loki Games. Loki didn't accept the "price" of license and since no other game companies like Loki on Linux, it was canceled.

    As a licensed owner of the game, it made me mad for sure. Months of watching newsgroups for a "light" for Wine compatability of the game, it of course shocked me.

    Sounds unbeliavable?

    Here is the link of that story: http://www.linuxgames.com/news/index.php3/4035

    Don Hopkins did it, a sims executable for linux natively exist and now Mandrake and Transgaming tries to run it via (ok, not emulator) Wine.

    It sounds tragi-comic to me, am I alone?

  90. Just another attempt to a 'vertical' market by bockman · · Score: 2

    This is just an advertising gimmick; nothing new is being advertised (winex is already available, they are just putting it in a pretty package with some windows game).


    There are people out there that do not use the computers as 'general purpose' machine but for a specific purpose, and always the same. And many PC are sold expecially for a purpose: Games. So it quite logic to build a distribution to address this need (if Linux is ready for that is another question).


    Linux distributors starts to realize that the 'package and support' business model pays more when you address vertical market segments. Want a web server/firewall/game machine/database engine/whatever ? Just insert the CD, follow installation instructions and you are done.


    Linux and open-source software, because of flexibility and aboundance of tools, are quite good to build vertical solutions. Moreover, this allows distributors to sell basically the same things in more than a shrink-wrapped box, sort of like car manifacturers uses the same engine/components for more than one car.

    If these pre-built solutions are valid and the price is right, most people will buy them, instead of try to build their own out of pieces downloaded from the Net.

    --
    Ciao

    ----

    FB

  91. Konqueror + ActiveX plugins by pacc · · Score: 0

    It's time the Linux distributions accepts that they can't do everything themselves and adds a simple "installer" to help out with downloading MS's free truetype fonts, emulated plugins for Konqueror etc.

  92. Is there any real point? by yobbo · · Score: 0

    Mandrake aren't allowed to distribute the nvidia drivers with their distro if I remember correctly. So what's the point of releasinga gamers OS when alot of the gamer's market will have extremely slow performance compared to their windows install?

  93. Re:Mandrakesoft CEO expects 99% linux marketshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hi
    good translation, but OS (Operating System in english) is translated BONE. Quite funny for a frenchy like me :D

    I'd like to say also that Mandrake should maybe packaage a distro with Quake on Lan.
    The wannabe hard-core gamers would like it very much. And as I can see here, pubs with networked PCs are beginning to catch people more than classic arcade ones. It's maybe the future.

    My 0.02 euros

  94. Interesting... by BSDGeek · · Score: 1

    Im all for the TransGaming WineX and all, but I don't like the game-bundling ideas. I would get this if it weren't for the semi-high price tag, and I don't want The Sims. Mandrake isn't the best distribution either, although this takes them up several notches in my opinion. As you can tell from my username, I like *BSD. So, I think that the guys at FreeBSD should start doing stuff like this.

  95. translation edited by clarkie.mg · · Score: 1

    OK I edited the translation.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  96. cvs? what cvs? by raindog2 · · Score: 1

    >Like it or not, Windows Update is much easier
    >to use for the Unwashed Masses than is cvs

    However, Mandrake's update tool is easier to use (and more current) than Windows Update. I'd even say it's slightly more accessible to the unclued due to its default presence on the desktop.

    Number of times I've compiled my own kernel since installing Mandrake for the first time in 1999: zero.

    Number of times I've EVER had to check code out of cvs for my home machine, even when I ran Slackware: zero.

    The roll-your-own, alpha-software-on-a-production-server, Slack-or-nothing crowd will always be out there. I'm here to say it's now possible to run a stable production Linux box, desktop or server, without even installing gcc. Security announcements get mailed to you, you run the update tool, click "Install", and you're done. It's not only possible, it's *great*. Don't kid yourself, it's not 1994 any more.

  97. What kinds of broad patents are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the situation exactly parallels Photoshop versus GIMP

    Broad patents and all?

  98. It is in my nature by Lord+Vipor+Scorpion · · Score: 1

    Attacking you was pointless, but then so is your response. I didn't see many posts complaining about new Linux gamers, just the opposite. But there is a valid concern about gaining ground by emulating Windows. Anyway, I'm glad you enjoyed it.

    LVS: "Feel my sting, Jon."
    JS: "It's hard to feel your sting, Lord Vipor, while you're adjusting your mask."

  99. A little premature??? by vandan · · Score: 1

    I can see a few Linux gamers looking sideways at it, but for the sake of Linux's reputation, I hope no Windows games actually expect to get any action from anything other than Starcraft and Half-Life. Sorry but it's true. Plus we need some Linux ports that take full advantage of LINUX, not a Windows compatibility layer trying to be something it isn't.

  100. Win2K vs. Mandrake - another view by Kaiwen · · Score: 1
    It is plenty stable for desktop use (I've only had 3 BSODs in over a year of running Win2k)

    I dual boot between Win2K (service packless) and Mandrake (recently upgraded to 8.1), and dearly wish I had your lack of problems. 3 BSOD's a year? I probably average twice that a week, and that's not an exaggeration. I can all but guarentee a BSOD just by firing up Roxio's EZ-CD Creator 5. Win2K is NOT a stable platform. At least, not for me.

    Conversely, Mandrake has yet to belly-up once. YMMV.

    1. Re:Win2K vs. Mandrake - another view by kikta · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. However, to give you a little assist, Win2K is MUCH more stable with Service Pack 2. Anything less than that and you'll have a shitload of problems (usually).

  101. Re:sorry - Windows does multitask just fine. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2
    I don't think any system can be excessive for a home machine. The more power you have the better, video games, video/audio editing, compiling, etc..

    x86 hardware takes a 20-25% hit on IO alone, a dual cpu machine can help with this, you don't feel the sudden loss of responsive when you open a floppy or work with files.

    With PC hardware getting so cheap, 512meg-1gig of ram should be common in machines. Might as well have as much of a IO buffer as you can use. I'm waiting for the AMD XP/MP 1800+ duals to come out. Thou, I'm my FPS is just starting to drop in newer games, I might wait for 2000+ and a gf3 ti500.

  102. Re:the sims? The real reason..... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Bleah... I hate to say it, but I suspect the real reason they included a game like "The Sims" has much more to do with the lower demands on the video adapter than anything else.

    One of the biggest headaches with Linux and X is getting the accelerated 3D support working properly with games. Sure, Quake usually works pretty well - but look how many 3D shooters there are, and how few tried doing a Linux port. Even Unreal Tournament for Linux is very picky... I often had it working fine with my 3DFX Voodoo 3 board, only to have it break when I upgraded an RPM of one thing or another.

    Games that don't require lots of fast, 3D scrolling are automatically more Linux-friendly -- and The Sims is probably the biggest selling example of one of these types of games in recent history. So there you have it....

  103. Re:sorry - Windows does multitask just fine. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    I don't think any system can be excessive for a home machine. The more power you have the better, video games, video/audio editing, compiling, etc...

    I agree with this, but I didn't mean "excessive" as in "More than Anybody Needs", but rather -- more than enough to perform the tasks requested.

    There will always be situations where more is better, but there will also be points where more isn't noticable.

    I was simply stating you can get great performance in the 800 to 1 ghz range -- but that doesn't mean Windows multitasks as well as Unix, it simply means our machines are getting so fast we hardly notice anymore.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  104. Re:sorry - Windows does multitask just fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The current linux kernel isn't preemptive either.

  105. Fw:point-and-drool nerds by RumbaFlex · · Score: 1

    [The good point is there are a lot of Linux users that would like to play games, but do NOT want to install Windows (either pirated or original) because we know where that road ends...]

    Where that ends..
    You make it sound like windows is really addictive, like a crackOS or something. And perhaps not wrongly so, I've seen XP, and the amount of tweaking it requires to not feel like you are on some freaky circus-sideshow ride, with some evil unseen force pulling the switches, is huge..

    But hey, the the day there are true print-quality graphic/layout applictions, and flash/shockwave production tools for linux, I see no point sticking to any version of windows.

    --
    -By attempting the impossible we can achieve the absurd..