Slashdot Mirror


HP Officially Announces 40g MP3 Stereo Component

jspectre writes "HP announced their new de100c "digital entertainment center." Containing a 40g drive and a built in CDRW drive it will store "up to 750 CDs of music" or 9000 tracks. You can make your own playlists and burn them out to CDR/CDRW's. All of this for $999.99. No mention of any digital management controls on the device." I totally need a review model! I saw this thing at the last LinuxWorld and it looked good, but only really playing with it for a few weeks will let me know if it's better then the audiotron that I've been using in my home system.

294 comments

  1. When will it be $300 bucks? by wessto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I want it for my home, why would I buy this? can't I get an actual CD Jukebox that stores around 100 CD's for about $300? Yeah Yeah, it's cool and everything, but I won't be rushing out to get one. Mp3's seem cost effective in their portability. At home though, $1000 seems a bit much.

    1. Re:When will it be $300 bucks? by CmdrTaco+on · · Score: 1, Funny

      As long as it's Linux CmdrTaco will jixx in his pants over it. When the iPod came out he called it lame at $400. This thing costs $1000, is not portable and is basically a PC. I mean you can build one for far less. And I doubt HP will release the software. CmdrTaco is a whore of the worst kind. And I bet it looks like shit.

      --

      saru mo ki kara ochiru

    2. Re:When will it be $300 bucks? by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      Ah, but you are a slashdot reader - the idea of this is surely as a consumer hifi device that "12 o'clock flashers" * can use to get into MP3 fun.

      * i.e. people whose VCR's are flashing at 12:00 ;-)

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  2. Waste of money by turd191 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a bad decision on HP's part and even worse decision by anybody that would actually pay money for this. You can build or purchase a pc that has more functionality and also do all that this box is capable of for less money.

    1. Re:Waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > You can build or purchase a pc that has more
      > functionality

      We might be able to build one, but not everybody can. And not everybody wants a PC in their living room. The price is high, but as we know, it will come down. Hope HP makes it...they've been doing some cool stuff recently.

    2. Re:Waste of money by wikki · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. You can get a nice "digital entertainment system" for 999 these days. Not to mention that you probably need a computer to make this thing useful anyway. But I do want to know.... does it a have a built in gnutella servant?

    3. Re:Waste of money by biggerboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think we covered this somewhere else -- why would anyone want a honking, fan-blowing PC running while their stereo is going?

      It's the usual /. PC-centric rant. The only thing missing is the word Linux.

    4. Re:Waste of money by Anomymous+Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure about the gnutella remark, but it seems possible.

      The machine does have some sort of built in networking ability, possibly to grab mp3's off of a home computer, but according to their specs (see my other post), it also works with your (non aol / non free ) ISP to access the internet. This seems to imply to me that there COULD be some sort of filesharing built in. I guess you'd have to buy one to be sure.

    5. Re:Waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too expensive, but it does have advantages over PCs. Smaller case. No noisy fans. Uses less power. Doesn't look too out of place next to a stereo. Probably sounds better than a PC, since it's designed to play music and only music. Much simpler to use than a PC (simple to use controls, likely no assembly or complex configuring required, unlike a PC).

      Dedicated devices will always beat a general-purpose PC on ease of use, which is what this thing's target audience is, who most likely want to listen to cds/mps on their stereo but without a noisy, complex, cumbersome PC. If you want to build your own, go ahead. Joe Sixpack (the other 90% of the civilized world) doesn't.

    6. Re:Waste of money by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      For $1000 I can buy a used P/166, a huge HD or two (40gb? Please. I can get a CD changer that holds 100 CDs at a time, you need to come with more than 40gb to beat that), install a console linux, buy an old used LCD monitor and a keyboard and still have enough left over to build another one.

      You're right, I don't really want this computer in my living room, but it's better than wasting $1000 on something a lot less versatile. Heck, my machine plays Ogg Vorbis too. :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    7. Re:Waste of money by Score+Whore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny how everybody figures that they can slap one of these things together from the spare parts in their junk pile. How much do you want to bet that the analog audio portion of this device is better (ie. better S-to-N ratio, wider dynamic range, etc.) ? How about their software? Sure you may be content with a pound sign and a blinking cursor in an x-term, but some of us would rather have a device that actually acts like what it does, rather than pretends to be what it does. I've been building this kind of box in my spare time and it's not trivial. At a price point of $1,000 I'll probably continue with my project, but if they get down to $500, my homebrew solution is out the door.

    8. Re:Waste of money by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      How great can the audio be? It's mp3. And since the mp3s have to come from somewhere, why wouldn't I just listen to my orignal CDs/LPs/8-tracks/whatever?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    9. Re:Waste of money by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      >How great can the audio be? It's mp3.
      I agree and disagree; you can get CD-quality out of mp3 compression, but not at 40GB/750CDs: Higher quality will cost you more space.
      (check R3MIX for excellent stuff on the subject)

      >why wouldn't I just listen to my orignal CDs/LPs/8-tracks/whatever
      Because doing this will generally make you listen to one CD at a time (or up to the limit of you CD changer). Then you have to get out of the couch to change it. (why do I need remote control?).

      I'm converting all my CDs (all legal) to mp3. I leave xmms on "ramdom", and it can play for weeks (ok, two weeks and some days).

      Anyway, for 1000 US I'd stuff my networked boxes with 40G HDs, and buy all the necessary CDs to fill'em up with mp3!

      (pleaseplease guys don't start a war about "CD-quality not being quality")

    10. Re:Waste of money by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      As I finished my previous post, the thought occurred to me that arguing with audiofiles about the relative merits of any sound system, or the expense associated with such sound systems was about as much use as trying to convince a Free Software zealot that certain proprietary software is okay because company X, Y, or Z is "really cool". Me personally, as long as I can't hear too much tape hiss or noticable artifacts of compression, would never be able to tell you the difference between "high quality" components and run of the mill stuff. If I have problems with the system, my first impulse is just to turn it up a little (or a lot if I really like the tune). Beyond that, if I want "realistic" sound quality, I'll just go wreck my ears by seeing the band play live.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    11. Re:Waste of money by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      You're right, for a grand, this is not worth it. I mean, a 40GB HDD is about $80 right??? For $400 though, this is a good thing. Not all of us want to have a computer to play MP3s. That's why I got a Philips Expanium instead of a laptop, and why I would get one of these instead of an HP kayak to play MP3's. Or a Sony 400 CD changer. Screw flexibility. I just want it to start as quickly as my receiver does. 2 seconds. Oh, and I don't want my music shutting off because Windows crashes (And don't give me any of that crap about switching to Linux. I love Linux, but this is the real world... I make money with Windows (Linux too, but I digress)) :-)

      Simplicity. That's why the XBox is primed to lead the convergence march, and why Microsoft is willing to take the hit in hardware cost. The XBox proper isn't going to make MS money. The services and lockin they're going to get is what they are after, and for good reason. Most people don't want a complicated computing experience, which is what WindowsNT, PCI, USB, and their ilk bring people. Painful computing experiences.

      Just remember the masses are asses, and most can't figure out how to use the defrost setting on their microwave....

      -Chris

  3. Digital management by quartz · · Score: 2

    No mention of any digital management controls on the device

    Digital management controls on the device would be nice, actually. Digital rights management controls, on the other hand...

  4. why? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this significantly different from getting a kick-ass sound card (for around $200) and a 40g hard drive (for around $150) in my computer (which I already own) and hooking it up to my stereo? I can't think of a good reason to spend $999 for dedicated hardware.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:why? by sledd_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because it has factory audio components that fit seamlessly into your existing home entertainment center?
      Because it (guessing) makes less noise than a PC?
      Because it doesn't look like your science project gone bad?

      --
      I know a little sig that's just ten words long
    2. Re:why? by dorsey · · Score: 1

      But is it really worth paying twice as much to have a stereo component that does nothing else other than look nicer than a PC?

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    3. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You don't get out much, do you?

      Do you have any idea how ridiculous your question sounds to someone who has spent more on thier entertainment centre than thier car?

    4. Re:why? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 4, Informative

      True, but you can also put together something that looks nice (in a small form factor case: BookPC for example) that also has quality stereo/video/tv output for a lot less money.

      The only kicker would be the user interface. I've seen a couple of things on Freshmeat that put a nice front end (that's TV resolution friendly) for a "media" computer. I guess it comes down to a) how much you're willing to spend and b) how much sweat you want to invest.

      At close to a grand its for me its worth building my own. Once it comes down to within $50 or so of building something comparable I'd be willing to plunk my money down.

    5. Re:why? by uslinux.net · · Score: 1


      * Remote control
      * LCD display

      Yes, you could build something cheaper, but most home users would never BUILD something like this.

      Cost needs to come down to the sub $200 level to really reach a consumer market, however.

    6. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like that certainly don't read slashdot looking for advice moron.

    7. Re:why? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Funny

      <GeekBashingJoke>Because some of us live in homes with TWO rooms, where we want to use our computer in our office AND let someone else (like this thing known as a "wife") listen to music. Not everyone lives with our mom and just has to worry about his own room.</GeekBashingJoke>

      In any case, you would want it for the same reason you might have a "dedicated" CD player on your stereo stack. Sometimes you want your computer to be your computer, and stereo equipment to be stereo equipment on the rack.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:why? by ravrazor · · Score: 2

      One issue I ran into with my pc-based mp3 server is that there's no way to view and edit the playlists other than at your computer...i can skip a track via an IR receiver, but in terms of any more complicated interaction with the computer remotely, i haven't been able to find anything, other than a IR-boosted palm pilot using Bluetooth or WAP...and that's not the simplest or cheapest way. Anybody else got suggestions?
      In that sense, then this almost becomes worth it (almost). it's integrated, remote controllable and won't look wacky sitting in your living room.

      The best thing I can see about this is that it uses your tv to do stuff like this...and it's always more convenient/easier to be able to use a tv w/ remote than having to walk to your computer.
      ...my 2 cents...

    9. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the average joe can't do what you and I can do.

      Also, keep in mind that this thing probably has a much nicer/simpler UI than anything you would just slap together. You would have a spend a significant amount of time/energy making it look like a peice of stereo equipment. (Not that you couldn't take the time...)

    10. Re:why? by jack1323 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the price is a little much...but as far as sound quality goes, everyone I know who has connected their sound card to their stereo hears a barely audible ~50Hz hum on the channel. Most people who connect to their stereo do it to play there music loud(er), in which that barely audible hum becomes quite audible. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't heard a sound card that doesn't put this noise on the line.

    11. Re:why? by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a consumer-entertainment device aimed at a market that's not as adept with computers as the usual /. crowd. It's intended for someone who needs Steve the Dell Computer Kid to tell him what to look for in a PC.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    12. Re:why? by barole · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, if you have already spent a lot of time and money making that room look the way you want it to look.

    13. Re:why? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2

      Which is why I said it all depends on a) how much you want to spend and b) how much sweat you want to invest.

      Geesh... read the whole post before replying.

    14. Re:why? by robvasquez · · Score: 0


      I was just talking to STEVEN. This is what he had to say:

      "Dude! You're gettin a Dell!"

      Words of wisdom at its finest.

    15. Re:why? by dorsey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a cheap PC that I use as an mp3 jukebox and dvd player. As such, I have a video card that has a tv output. They're really not uncommon, nor that expensive. So with that and a RF keyboard I can do all the things you want to do from the comfort of my couch.

      So far it seems the only justification for a component mp3 player is that people are *really* anal about the appearance of their stereo.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    16. Re:why? by schmaltz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because it (guessing) makes less noise than a PC?
      You'll find that's not the case. The specs quote THD and dynamic range values (-86dB and 87dB respectively) that are on par with cheap PC soundcards, significantly worse than decent home and prosumer audio gear.

      Combine that with artifacts introduced and frequences subtraced by lossy MP3 compression, you've a recipe for poor quality sound (caveat: I've not listened to one yet.)

      For a kilobuck, you can have a nice quality CD juke that'll give you much better sound quality.

      And, it is a PC. Read the specs. I'd pry one open before buying to see if the audio output section/soundcard is built into the system board. In PCs where that's the case, I've found there to be *loads* of mobo-generated noise.
      --
      Big Daddy, Johnny, Burp, Aunt Zelda, Scott, Slurp, Big Momma ... where's Siggy?
    17. Re:why? by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      It's worth mentioning that if the sound is kept solely digital (MP3 decoded to digital sound, and then sent from a digital output), this shouldn't happen, but that requires hardware to decode the digital output when it arrives.

      Also, AFAIK only the nForce sound system can actually encode into digital, as opposed to simply outputting pre-encoded digital sound.

    18. Re:why? by Spydr · · Score: 0

      it's all bout the remote control! you gotta get up and click on the computer, but with this you can just lounge around on the couch.

      so it's really more like $700 for a remote control.

    19. Re:why? by Webere · · Score: 1

      I think he probably meant that it (hopefully) doesn't sound like a hurricane when you turn it on, not that it has a higher quality audio output.

      Hell, I've got a G4 with only 2 fans (1 for the power supply, and one on the side of the case that isn't even vented), and even the amount of air noise it puts out is irritating.

    20. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Creative SB Live will output digital

    21. Re:why? by rcw-work · · Score: 2, Informative

      The ~50Hz hum you're hearing is actually 60Hz AC. This is usually caused by a ground loop. It can be eliminated using a ground loop isolator or (more cheaply) hooking the stereo and computer to the same power strip. Removing the ground connection from the computer via a 2-prong to 3-prong adapter can also eliminate it (although you're not supposed to do that. :)

    22. Re:why? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oddly enough, this is not being marketed at people who can build a superior solution, in the same way that the Ford Festiva was not marketed at automotive engineers who owned a machine shop that they used to design and build their own engines...

    23. Re:why? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      This may be the funniest thing I've read all week. Bravo, sir. I wish I'd a mod point to give (and if you have no mod points, well then god... bless... you...)

    24. Re:why? by Pope · · Score: 1

      I was talking to a friend who picked up a free 6100/66, and I mentioned that a pizza box Mac with A/V card would make a great CD/MP3 player. He says it'll play just about MP3 he throws at it.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    25. Re:why? by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Your analogy only works if the Ford Festiva sold for about $50k...

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    26. Re:why? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1
      I've actually put together a digital jukebox for my truck out of a bookpc, and got the user interface issue licked. It consists of: a bookpc (socket370 mb, case, power supply, floppy, cdrom) for $160, a celeron cpu -- $50, 40GB hd -- $75, LCD display module -- $8, 10-key keypad -- $10.


      The user interface is a small C program that takes commands from the keypad (i put custom labels on the keys for play, stop, track/album/playlist selection, record, etc.) and displays status info on the lcd. Recording is self-contained, you put a cd in, hit the record key, select a album slot (it auto-selects an empty one), select the tracks to record (defaults to all), then it starts ripping. You can play while ripping, and compression is done in a background batch process so you can have all the quality settings on high without waiting for compression. Tracks are instantly available to be played even if they haven't been compressed yet, and the batch job auto restarts if system is power cycled. As soon as I get a chance, I'll put the project up on sourceforge, hopefully it will get to a point where it can be downloaded as an iso image, and you can plop the cd in a new system and it will auto-install everything. The goal is no pc/keyboard/monitor needed.

    27. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, your sig is sick. go read about Gandhi....

    28. Re:why? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

      That actually sounds very cool. That's pretty much what I'm looking to build, with the addition of ethernet (maybe wireless) so I can still access the music from other machines / stream audio.

      Looking forward to seeing your stuff if/when you get it up on sourceforge.

    29. Re:why? by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oddly enough, this is not being marketed at people who can build a superior solution, in the same way that the Ford Festiva was not marketed at automotive engineers who owned a machine shop that they used to design and build their own engines...

      Sorry, my subtlety detector is in the shop... Are you ragging on the Ford Festiva? I'm a proud owner of one, that my family gave me back in college (for free!). Amoung the many features:

      Great gas mileage (30+ some weeks)

      Self-changing oil (Self-draining, just add a quart or two a month!)

      Simple radio system (No CD or tape player)

      User-provided cronometer (the backlighting for the stereo's LCD display is out)

      Ample trunk space (For my laptop and the 12-pack of oil)

      Simplified air conditioning (no cooling, only heating)

      Multi-terrain capability (roads and sidewalks!)

      Daily excercise (no power steering, so your arms get a workout.)

      Seats 5 uncomfortably (I'm the only one that rides in it these days...)

      I'm sure there are other benefits. It has a few annoyances, but still runs. I can afford a better car, but I can't bring myself to change until this one dies. The thing simply lasts forever without needing maintainace work, so I'll probably have it for another 5-10 years.

    30. Re:why? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Gandhi is overrated. Something tells me that passive resistance would not have worked well for the Jews with Hitler...

      Just because he got lucky with India doesn't mean it's a viable philosophy in all (or even very many) cases.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    31. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gandhi was just working for independence from a pretty decent colonial power that was willing to pack up its marbles and go away. He wasn't trying to stop genocide or drive off an aggressive conqueror.

    32. Re:why? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Your analogy fails because the Ford Festiva is not obviously overpriced, where the de100c obviously is. Next time try "Ferrari Testarossa." Besides, to build something like the de100c you (and for that matter HP as well) do not have to design your own microprocessor or memory chips or hard drive. So instead of "Ferrari Testarossa" think "AC Cobra" or some other expensive collection of off-the-shelf parts.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    33. Re:why? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      I live in a home with (let me count) eight rooms, not counting bathrooms or the basement. My wife, son, and I own (let me count) five computers, not counting the firewall or my son's old P75 mouldering in the basement (or the Sinclair ZX80, now that I think about it :-) Not everyone is limited to one PC per person.

      One of those computers would do very nicely as a dedicated A/V unit, which I would prefer over having one of these de100c's and a TiVo and a DVD player. Why do TiVo and HP each put 80% of what I want in one box and make me buy another box that also has 80% of what I want, and having paid for 160% of what I want I'm still left 10% (DVD) short? Forget it, HP and TiVo: I want it all or you're just wasting my time, money, and shelf space.

      I'll even subscribe to their monthly service, if it offers enough convenience at a reasonable price; otherwise, I can enter date, time, and channel to record into my dedicated, home-brew A/V computer just as easily as I now enter the same information into my VCR. Hint on the convenience/price ratio: VCR+ is not worth it to me (my Father-in-law has it, and it sucks).

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    34. Re:why? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Is that what you really want -- an integrated all-in-one unit? On the surface, it sounds like a good thing: put everything in one box, and be done with it. But totally integrated stereo systems have not been as successful as component systems for the basic reason that people generally like to be able to upgrade a particular component without throwing everything away.

      What happens when 2 layer DVD comes out and you want to upgrade your DVD player for $200? Do you really want to have to buy another $1500 unit that includes a whole new integrated MP3 jukebox, TiVo, tuner, amplifier, tape deck and X-Box video game? I exaggerate, but you can see the advantages to having each box do something well (kind of like the Unix philosophy :) ).

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    35. Re:why? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      What happens when 2 layer DVD comes out and you want to upgrade your DVD player for $200? Do you really want to have to buy another $1500 unit that includes a whole new integrated MP3 jukebox, TiVo, tuner, amplifier, tape deck and X-Box video game? I exaggerate, but you can see the advantages to having each box do something well (kind of like the Unix philosophy :) ).

      Yes, I want the Unix approach, as in one server running Samba and Apache and Sendmail. What you propose is three servers, one for Samba, one for Apache, and one for Sendmail. No, thanks. There is no need to replace the entire box to upgrade to 2 layer DVD; just replace the DVD drive. Of course, the likes of HP wouldn't consider that a feature, they'd consider it a liability hurting future sales. They forget that their current limited offerings hurt current sales. Why should I buy this $1000 HP box when for the same money I can make a modular, upgradeable box that does more?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    36. Re:why? by richieb · · Score: 1

      * Remote control


      Why remote control? Can't I use my laptop and a browser? Especially with wireless home network...


      ...richie

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    37. Re:why? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I kind of vaguely remember some modular stereo systems a long time ago that were slot-based, trying to do something like that. IIRC, the problem was that the added complexity increased cost and the box size (need to leave room for slots) didn't give enough advantages over just making separate components in a stack. After all, what are you paying extra for? A power supply and a case? I somehow doubt a fully modular system would be that much more expensive than some frankenstein modular system, not to mention that you would probably only be able to get modules from that manufacturer.

      On the plus side, you would probably get some added integration by allowing one processor to control multiple components, but I'm not sure that would worth the extra hassle.

      Given the lock-in capability and the desire to sell you more modules, I wouldn't be surprised if some companies have experimented with systems like that, but it probably proved impractical.

      To be honest, I think your "single server" approach is more like the Microsoft approach. One monolithic system with lots of objects tightly integrated. The object/integrated nature gives a lot of benefits (object embedding, for example), but you tend to lose a lot of flexibility. I think a modular system like you describe would suffer a lot of the same problems.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    38. Re:why? by bitmason · · Score: 1

      It's not different (and it is). I have a home-built "media server" that I didn't pay all that much more for than this toy and it's got a pair of RAID 1 mirrored 45GB drives. (It'll be interesting to see what happens when all these stateful consumer electronic toys start to die and lose state -- a new concept -- but I digress.)

      What IS different are two main things. Streamlined usability for the computerphobes and better form factor/noise/etc. for the entertainment center. The big downsides of my homebuilt "media center" are it doesn't fit in my stereo cabinet and it's too loud.

    39. Re:why? by uslinux.net · · Score: 1
      Why remote control? Can't I use my laptop and a browser? Especially with wireless home network...

      Because we're talking about consumer electronics. Because consumer electronics means consumers can just plug it in and go. Let's face it, computers are NOT consumer electronics. This box is supposed to be a stereo component, and as such, you need an easy way to sit on your sofa and turn it on, skip tracks, and at least manage basic CD-style functions.

      IMO, a web browser is good for creating playlists, but it's not practical for a component system. Heck, you can't even *assume* everyone who will purchase this will have a computer or a network configured.

    40. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first glance, I thought they meant a 40 gram drive which would actually be cooler than a 40 Gigabyte drive. Imagine a tiny 40 gram mp3 player that could fit into your ear.

      Notation is important.

      40 g = 40 grams
      40 GB = 40 Gigabytes

  5. No Digital Rights Management - Yee Haw! by Distan · · Score: 1

    Wow! If HP really shipped this thing without any digital rights management, that would show that there is at least one company out there who understands and knows how to do things right.

    With all the mismanagement and crappy products coming out of HP recently, I had all but given up on them. But this might show that there is a glimmer of hope after all.

    The "technical description" of this product that I have read has been kind of vague. Can anyone confirm that it doesn't do anything whatsoever to restrict what you do with your music?

    1. Re:No Digital Rights Management - Yee Haw! by deanstevenson · · Score: 1

      What crappy products coming out of HP are you referring to?

  6. looks sweet, but... by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    yeah, it sounds nice, but is it really worth the thousand dollar price tag? an embedded linux system that plays mp3s, burns, and has a 40GB disk. Hopefully the sound quality beats audiotron, but it's still a little pricey for my tastes. Oh, and a possible first post, although I'm sure the anonymous cowards have beaten me to it by now. The price I pay for actually putting down something worthwhile (to me, anyways...)

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  7. that's strange... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

    it's odd that HP would release a product like this, when its newly-assimilated partner Compaq just released an eerily similar product at the exact same price point. And from what i can tell, the Compaq product is less attractive, as it lacks the CD-burner feature. Spooky.

    1. Re:that's strange... by Distan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not strange at all. The merger has barely been announced, while these products must have been in the pipeline for awhile.

      Furthermore, even if the companies wanted to not step on each other's toes, the law requires that they continue to behave as competitors until the final merger goes through.

    2. Re:that's strange... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      right, and as such, it would seem appropriate for HP to release a slightly more competetive product than Compaq did...for instance, if they would have simply upped the hard drive space by 5 gigs or maybe sold an equivalent model for 50 bucks less. But all in all, this product absolutely kicks the Compaq Music Center's ass.

      I see what you're saying and everything, and i totally agree with you, but it still seems odd to me that HP would want to upstage Compaq in such a huge way.

  8. not especially impressed... by connorbd · · Score: 2

    Would it really be that hard to build one of those for far less than HP is charging, say with an LCD display and remote on the front of a filthy-cheap tower box? (Not to mention a video card with an S-video jack so you can do your selecting through the TV...)

    /Brian

    1. Re:not especially impressed... by GunFodder · · Score: 1

      The stereo component type box is important. I don't want a mini-tower in my living room, and I have ethernet running down my hall. Maybe if it comes with some sort of cozy - a flowery cloth cover to hide the mini-tower?

    2. Re:not especially impressed... by connorbd · · Score: 2

      Actually, I was just thinking black case. I'm assuming off-the-shelf components here, and my original thought was an NLX slimline case, which would be the ideal size... but of course the idea fell apart when I realized that most of those are designed more with minimal-but-complete functionality in mind and simply don't have the drive bays to do what I was thinking.

      The truth is that it would be rather nice to be able to get a stereo component case for a computer -- the only problem is that I'm not sure how much a front panel display and IR reciever would add on to the price.

      /Brian

  9. So basically... by laserjet · · Score: 1

    So basically HP is coming out with a computer, at twice the price and no monitor?

    It's always too little too late.

    Don't get me wrong - I would love to have one of these, it JUST ISN"T SOMETHING I WOULD BUY. And that's bad for HP - they need people to BUY stuff to make money. The way our economy is right now, people are stopping spending money on luxury items, such as this (i.e. shit you don't need). I doubt anyone here will buy this, but I sure wish my friend would so I could borrow it some time.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  10. Too expensive by kawaichan · · Score: 1

    $999 for a PC that look like a VCR? I don't think so. You could probably build yourself a cheap PC with all the functions sans the look for less than 500. This will probably fail, way too expensive.

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:Too expensive by jspectre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You miss the point. This device isn't for computer-savvy people who can rip-mix-burn their own mp3's.. This is for mom and pop who don't know an mp3 from an IDE.

      Also take a look at the extra features (that I should have mentioned when submitting the article). The box also is 'net savvy and will download to your portable mp3 player (doesn't mention which ones are supported though). So it's a little more sophisticated than your average mp3 player.

      Wonder what OS it's running and what upgrades they could come up with for it. Turn it into a WebTV/PTR unit and it's a nice combo box for your bucks.

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    2. Re:Too expensive by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      How many mom and pops do you know that drop $1000 on a single stereo component and that don't have jobs that require use and understanding of computers, and yet would still have access to MP3 files to begin with?

    3. Re:Too expensive by silicon_synapse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know that this is picky, but your sig is redundant. Please use 15% or 15 percent but not 15% percent. It just irks me. Did you do that on purpose? wait a minute...you're in on the conspiracy aren't you!?

    4. Re:Too expensive by jspectre · · Score: 1

      The same ones that might drop $3000 for a 60" TV? What's wrong with 30"?

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  11. Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    People are gonna be pissed when copy protection breaks these things.

  12. Storage in the wrong place by Mwongozi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Since this thing is supposed to sit in your hi-fi stack, it's not supposed to be portable, yes? And since it plays MP3s, it's assumed that you own a PC, yes?

    So why put any storage in it at all? Why not just shove a network socket on the back, or make it 802.11x aware, and play MP3s off a server on your network?

    That would be sweet.

    1. Re:Storage in the wrong place by pdh11 · · Score: 1

      http://www.riohome.com/HomeAudio.htm

      Disclaimer: I work for those guys.

    2. Re:Storage in the wrong place by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      And, what happens when the hard drive fails? Will HP replace all the music that I didn't backup? They expect us to backup 40 gigs of music on cdr's?

      I can imagine the tech support calls at HP...

      "My music won't play. All I hear is a clicking noise."

      "Your hard drive needs to be replaced, Ma'am."

      "What's a hard drive? Will that fix my music?"

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    3. Re:Storage in the wrong place by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      And since it plays MP3s, it's assumed that you own a PC, yes?

      No. You'll note that it doesn't specifically mention PCs, and it includes a CD-RW drive. It looks like it can rip and burn CDs by itself.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:Storage in the wrong place by KFury · · Score: 2

      "And, what happens when the hard drive fails? Will HP replace all the music that I didn't backup? They expect us to backup 40 gigs of music on cdr's? "

      Dude, you ripped them from CDs. They're your backup.

    5. Re:Storage in the wrong place by SteveM · · Score: 2

      checkyoulater writes: "And, what happens when the hard drive fails? Will HP replace all the music that I didn't backup? They expect us to backup 40 gigs of music on cdr's? "

      To which KFury responds: Dude, you ripped them from CDs. They're your backup.

      I don't know if KFury meant his reply tongue in cheek, but it is essentially true today, as most people have their music collection on CDs.

      But some day music will be distributed in downloadable form in a fashion that most people will get their music via downloads and not on physical media.

      As hard drive capacities grow and prices shrink, how will al this music be backed up?

      Steve M

    6. Re:Storage in the wrong place by KFury · · Score: 2

      "But some day music will be distributed in downloadable form in a fashion that most people will get their music via downloads and not on physical media. "

      More than likely this future where music is distributed electronically will not be one where you pay money, get a download, and then have responsibility over backups.

      One of the goodpoints of digital rights management, for all its bad points, is that this future will probably be more along the lines of: You pay money to buy rights to listen to such-and-such. If you lose it in a hard disk crash (if they even let you keep a static version) you still own the rights and can download it again.

      It's not like we're talking about unique data files here. If you bought it, it's yours, and if there's one benefit here, it's that you can always download it again.

      Either way, the only person whose ass isn't covered is the music pirate.

    7. Re:Storage in the wrong place by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      Nice try, but it requires Windows ... ugh.

      D

    8. Re:Storage in the wrong place by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 2

      Nope, check out http://www.mock.com/receiver/server/ for how to use the Rio Receiver with Linux.

    9. Re:Storage in the wrong place by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      It does have an ethernet jack on the back. But it doesn't say what it is for (specifically, it mentions that the modem is for internet connectivity. Or rather, that internet connectivity is via the modem.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:Storage in the wrong place by Patman · · Score: 2

      They have this. It's called the Audiotron
      I have one at home, and it rocks. Stick your files on a SMB share and Audiotron finds them and plays them.
      And for less than a third of the price of this thing.

    11. Re:Storage in the wrong place by pergamon · · Score: 2

      It does mention listening to "Internet Radio"... Who knows exactly what that is (I'd guess just streaming MP3), but it is likely you could use your PC as the "Internet Radio Station".

    12. Re:Storage in the wrong place by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      Thats assuming, of course, that the future isn't pay-per-play (which it seems is the way the music industry would rather have it).

      Otherwise, this will be known as a feature.

    13. Re:Storage in the wrong place by dimer0 · · Score: 1

      Uh, you just described (minus the 802.11x support) the Audiotron. It will search across all Windows filesystem shares (samba, too), figure out what's there, index them many different ways, and when the request goes out for a song playback, it grabs it and starts playing in milliseconds. And, you can grab one at Best Buy on clearance for $149.

    14. Re:Storage in the wrong place by karnal · · Score: 1

      umm... I thought the point of the device was that IT HAS A CDR and you CAN BACK YOUR STUFF UP.

      It's just like if you have a computer and you do not regularly back it up -- you're guaranteed loss of data, especially over a long timespan. Something's gonna break sometime.

      --
      Karnal
    15. Re:Storage in the wrong place by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Since this thing is supposed to sit in your hi-fi stack, it's not supposed to be portable, yes? And since it plays MP3s, it's assumed that you own a PC, yes?

      Well if it's half as cool as the system that Be, Inc. was working on, you will pop in a new CD, and it will pull all the tracks off and start playing the CD. Then it encodes them into MP3's in the background.

      I'm sure another use for this thing will be downloading/streaming music from the internet.

      So no, you don't necessarily need a computer.

      But I definitely won't buy one until they get 802.11b inside.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    16. Re:Storage in the wrong place by smoketree · · Score: 1
      Also, check out http://jreceiver.sourceforge.net for a servlet-based solution that'll run under Linux, Windows, etc.

      And you get dynamic playlists (using sql queries) as a bonus!

    17. Re:Storage in the wrong place by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      So, if you work for those guys, can you please ask them to combine it with their ReplayTV? Then add a DVD/CD drive. If you guys make a box that does all that (audio and video), I'll buy it.

      Why should I have to buy 3 boxes, each with only 80% of what I want? You want me to pay 240% to get 100%? I should buy 3 cases, 3 power supplies, 3 user interfaces, 3 amplifiers, 3 audio A/D and D/A converters (one in the Rio, one in the Replay, and one in the DVD), and 2 video A/D and D/A converters (one in the Replay and one in the DVD player)? And after all that I can only play my files on your box? Forget it! I fear the only companies that get it are the Japanese, because they really do have livingroom space issues. Sorry, but my shelves are allready full, and I'm not from California so I don't need more stuff to prove my manhood.

      And why does the Replay TV 4000 only let me play my files on other Replay TV 4000s? Why can't I play them on my PC? Tell your employers that they are way too proprietary for this early adopter. I'll pay the big bucks for the latest toys, but only if they give me everything I want, not just some of what I want some of the time, under the manufacture's terms. Doesn't anyone at SONICblue ask the public what they want?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    18. Re:Storage in the wrong place by SteveM · · Score: 2

      One of the goodpoints of digital rights management, for all its bad points, is that this future will probably be more along the lines of: You pay money to buy rights to listen to such-and-such. If you lose it in a hard disk crash (if they even let you keep a static version) you still own the rights and can download it again.

      There are ways to make DRM work for both the producer and the consumer. Any DRMS that allows me to use a file that I have purchased on any machine and in any format I want, even when I do not own the machine, would be acceptable to me.

      Alas, the content companies don't seem to share my view. As another poster has pointed out, the RIAA, MPAA et al seem focused on a pay per play future.

      And I could see the situation where my digital music player dies and istead of honoring my license to music on the now dead system, I an forced to repurchase said music since it will now keyed to a different machine.

      It's sad really. There are a number a technologies I'd love to be using right now, HDTV, DVDA/SACD, DAT, digital music, 'DVD VCRs', that but for the greed of the content companies are essentially on hold.

      Steve Jobs and the folks at Baen Books get it. Piracy is a behavioral not technelogical problem.

      Sigh.

      Steve M

    19. Re:Storage in the wrong place by SteveM · · Score: 2

      This particular unit has a CDR. Which I am sure will lead to a call to HP from the RIAA's laywers.

      But a number of the home stereo component digital music players do not.

      And while many computer users are in the habit of making regular backups, I expect most are not. Visit any office building. Ask the people with computers on their desks how often they back them up. Count the blank stares...

      Yes I know, there may be network backups. But for most computer users backing up is not something they do or even think about doing.

      Now consider the home audio market. How many people backup their CDs, albums, tapes? Very, very few. (It isn't 0%, I actually know some people that do. They use the original as a reference copy and make a working copy to play.)

      Now throw in the fact that the RIAA considers it illegal to make a copy of a music file.

      The point that I am perhaps laboring to make is that once digital music becomes mainstream, most people will not back up their music. Most won't even recognize it as something to consider.

      And this will result in support nightmares ... "What do you mean my music is ALL GONE!!!" And blaming the customer, "... you should have made a backup ..." is rarely a good marketing strategy.

      As KFury points out, a good DRMS would solve this problem. "Sure thing Steve, we can download all of your licensed titles over night ...". But it will be quite awhile before we see such an enlightened attitude from the RIAA et. al.

      Steve M

  13. Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Kind of pricy, considering it doesn't have any speakers with it. For $1000, you could build a computer with much more than 40 GP of space and a nice sound card, and get things like gaming, internet, and office functionality out of it too.

  14. duplicate post ? by shivan · · Score: 2, Redundant

    isn't this [/.] the same article ??

    1. Re:duplicate post ? by khuber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes and whomever gave you offtopic is a dumbass.

      -Kevin

    2. Re:duplicate post ? by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      The exact same in fact... guess Taco doesnt read Slashdot eh?

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  15. Digital Rights Management by rmadmin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hrm.. I'm trying to figure something out here. Obviously the DMCA peoples and RIAA will be all over this one eventually. The question of the day for me is, how would you build in an effective digital rights management system without causing alot of problems?

    I certainly have no idea how to look at 2 mp3s, and say, 'Uh, this person owns this cd', or 'Uh, it was downloaded from napster! Evil copyright infringment person!!!!"

    I'm wondering if it is set up to only store mp3's that are ripped IN that unit, with no other method of transport. But that doesn't stop someone from copying someone elses CD, then ripping it. Or borrowing the CD for a day, and ripping it that way. I hate to rant on and on about the DMCA, but even though they won congress over, they are still fighting an uphill battle.

  16. Good Question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know the answer to the above?

    (Shameless, I know!)

  17. $1G? by Matt2000 · · Score: 2


    $999? Doesn't this seem a bit steep? That hard drive can't be worth much more than $100 at bulk pricing and the CDRW is probably worth about the same, if that.

    I'd just recommend to anyone thinking of buying this thing to get a low powered home computer, and an external DA.

    But then again, I'm a nerd.

    --

  18. $999?!?!? by iceT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's that a little high on the price? A Rio Reciever is only $150, and the audiotron is only $300... Hell, a TiVO with a 60GB hard drive is only $400 (list)...

    How do they justify a grand?

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    1. Re:$999?!?!? by smallpaul · · Score: 2

      Speaking of TiVo, when is somebody going to make a convergence device that does TiVo-like stuff and MP3-like stuff. Once you've got all of the connectors and the hard drive it is really just a question of software.

  19. A Waste Of Time. Another HP Blunder by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Consider what this is - an outdated PC repackaged as a "device". Whats inside? A Pentium and maybe 64 MB of RAM? Add on the 40GB hard rive and you are looking at $350 tops for the parts.

    As for having "all of my music in one box" - sure, if its portable. Why would I transfer all of the CDs in my jukebox over to another box, at lower fidelity? By virtue of having all of my CDs in my jukebox, all of my music is already in one box. The fact that the unit accesses the data on CDs instead of off of a hard drive is inconsequential.

    The only value add I can see is tha TV interface. Not worth a grand.

    This is as pathetic as the Audrey rollout by 3Com months ago. I makes me wince to watch the once venerable tech giants roll out ridiculous toys to the collective shrug of the consumer public.

    HP in particular is just becoming sad. They've devolved from a tech powerhouse to a manufacturing dinosaur trying to compete with $39 inkjet printers I can buy at the grocery store (who cares if they are junk??), Dell in the PC world, and IBM in enterprise computing. Maybe its good that both founders are gone now, so they don't have to see their once-great creation mate with Compaq.

  20. 40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by Ecyrd · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a moment I thought this was interesting: A 40 gram MP3 player. But then I realized someone had gotten their units mixed up again.

    Seems to happen a lot in the US. *evil grin*

    (G = Giga = 10^12, g = gram = 1/1000 of kilogram.)

    1. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be more correct to say that a 1 kilogram = 1000 grams as oppose to 1 gram = 1/1000 of a kilogram? I know they are equivilents, just courious .

    2. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by jimbo3123 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why this was moded funny.
      I was thinking the same thing. Is it really that tough for us nerds to use the correct notation, especially in front page stories?

      40g != 40GB

      --
      There should be a moderation category "Dumbest Comment EVER"
    3. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by BuGless · · Score: 1

      The standard defines how much a kilogram is, so by definition, that makes a gram 1/1000th of that.

    4. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      And here I was thinking the MP3 player accelerated at 392.266 m/s^2.


      (g=9.80665 m/s^2)

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    5. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by sporty · · Score: 2

      You got it wrong, its 40 grand, not 40 grams ;) (/joke)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    6. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by Milalwi · · Score: 1

      G = Giga = 10^12

      Umm... no. Giga == 10**9 (or 10^9, if you'd like) 10^12 is Tera

      Milalwi
    7. Re:40 Gigabytes, not 40 grams... by Glint · · Score: 1

      For a moment I thought this was interesting

      No you didn't. You're just looking for a chance to be pedantic.

  21. Kenwood Sovereign Line by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think I'd be more likely to buy an Entre' Hub from Kenwood. It's only got a 20GB drive (you just gotta bea able to hack those things!), but it'll link up to their 400+3 CD/DVD changers and will catalog and provide an interface for your real disks as well as the cool MP3 functions. List on the Entre' is $1800 or so, but street should be about $1000.

    Combine it with the Kenwood Sovereign amplifier (a bit pricey at $3k list, $2k street) and you can distribute audio via telephone jacks throughout your home and play multiple MP3s simultaneously in different locations.

    Me, I'm just drooling over the 400+3 disk progessive player...

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  22. not completely protection-free by Acrucis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw this thing at LWCE too, and it looks like it will kick ass. However, talking with the guy I asked if it was a standard IDE HDD that could be upgraded. He said that to keep the RIAA sorts happy all the mp3s were stored encrypted and that it was some sort of proprietary interface to keep people from swapping out HDDs. He said that you could pay for them to put in a bigger HDD, but that they had to have something to keep the lawsuits away, and that they were pleased that this was all it took to get approval from the music industry.

    1. Re:not completely protection-free by biostatman · · Score: 1

      So does the RIAA's recent legal successes put them in the position of being able to bully a company as big as HP/Compaq? Why in god's good name should the RIAA have a say in how the MP3's are stored?

      --
      For the love of $DEITY, loose != not win!!!!!
    2. Re:not completely protection-free by Technician · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, In that case, I'll hold out for one with an ethernet port instead of a modem. I want the ability to upload/download with my high speed connection and FTP to this device. That way I can also burn the MP3's into a CDR. The website says you can burn your favorite music to CD's. Reading between the lines means a music CD, NOT A MP3 CD!. You won't be getting MP3's off this to share with friends.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:not completely protection-free by fobbman · · Score: 2

      According to the product page this unit DOES come with a 10/100 baseT card.

    4. Re:not completely protection-free by Technician · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected again.. It says in the fine print on the second page (PDF won't allow cut and paste.. Darn..) Burn custom music and MP3 CD's.. I guess you can get MP3's out of the box. Now it is starting to look interesting.. ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    5. Re:not completely protection-free by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

      Either you were lied to, or the specs have changed. This says that it's a "40 GB IDE Ultra DMA drive", and that you can "Burn custom CDs (CDDA and MP3)with the built-in CD-writer". (On the second page. Under "Internal Storage Drive" and "Music Library" respectively.) The internal HD is standard, and you can export tracks to a CD as either MP3s or in the Redbook standard.

  23. UGLY by Refrag · · Score: 2

    That is a monstrosity, there is no one anything that ugly will ever have a place in my living room.

    Aesthetics do matter!

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  24. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's a computer with a CDR and a 40 gig hard drive for $1000. Big fucking deal.

  25. Tech Specs by Anomymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The tech specs are here (pdf)

    in case anyone's curious .....

    1. Re:Tech Specs by DickPhallus · · Score: 1

      I hope I don't have to pay for those :)

      --

      --
      Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
  26. Its all about marketing by SteveBobson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They arent trying to sell this system to the average /.er. They are trying to sell this to the millionaire house wife that is tired of sorting through her 250 different Yanni CDs who doesnt know the difference between a sound card and a credit card.

    They started the price extremely high for a purpose, the price will come down, but not before a bunch of the technology deficient purchase them.

    1. Re:Its all about marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for another company making a similar product. The cost of manufacture of these things is over $1,000. They thought that they could sell ads and subs the price with e-commerce between
      $300 and $600. Didn't happen.

    2. Re:Its all about marketing by cjsnell · · Score: 2

      Actually, I believe that they are trying to sell that Audiotron thing to the average slashdotter. Note the thinkgeek link in the story. This seems to be happening more and more lately. There are a lot less links to the actual manufacturer of the product and more links to places that sell it (ie Thinkgeek). This site used to be about information; now it seems to mostly exist to sell products to us.

  27. nice for non techs by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    cmon, losers, the rest of the world cant build a box for cheaper that does more ... only us techies can do that. :)

    Anyhow, release prices rarely stay at that .. I imagine the price will drop.

    This still doesn't address the fact that while we're willing to sacrifice sound quality on the road (ie, MP3s), but I don't see any reason to lossy-compress my 200 CDs into an inferior sounding library of music. :)

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  28. What is it running? by tplayford · · Score: 1

    Anyone know what it runs?

    Linux seems possible, although the CDR drivers are scsi (scsi-emulation is nesasery for IDE) only AFAIK.

    1. Re:What is it running? by Anomymous+Coward · · Score: 0

      if you look at my other post, I posted the tech specs... I looked at them for quite a while, and the OS isnt listed. HOWEVER, it does say that the box will not work with aol and certain free isp's, which leads me to believe it is NOT windows based, so, i'd assume linux, or some hack of HP UX, since that's developed in house? .

  29. For this price... by vinyl1 · · Score: 0

    you could actually buy a decent turntable. A Rega 3 with arm is $700, an MMF-7 is $900 with arm and cartridge.

    Leaves you enough for about 200 LPs at todays prices...

    vinyl1 (who else?)

    1. Re:For this price... by PoiBoy · · Score: 1

      I agree with this 100 percent. The local used records store has tons of great music priced at $3-4 per disk.

      More to the point of the article, why would anyone pay $1000 for a device to convert a CD into lower fidelity MP3 files? It doesn't make any sense if this is targeted to the home entertainment market.

      If a turntable is not your style, $1000 will buy you a very nice CD player with 24 bit DACS and HDCD decoding.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  30. Could you beg a little louder? by dgenr8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm a little tired of CmdrTaco's shameless begging for every new piece of equipment.

  31. Good but some problems. by SevenTowers · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is from the pdf :
    Write Speed Rips up to 4x (encoding MP3 compressed audio) CD-R media: up to 8x CD-RW media: up to 4x Disc finalization time: 2 minutes typical at 2X Audio Performance Encoding rate: 96 Kb/sec, 128 Kb/sec, 160 Kb/sec, 256 KB/sec Default encoding rate: 128 Kb/sec ***************** Operating temperature: 5 to 35 C (41 to 95 F) Operating humidity: 20% to 80% RH non-condensing

    - First of all, the website advertises "CDRW write speed up to 8X " although the pdf clearly specifies 4x.
    -The encoding rate is quite low... why didn't they include 320Kb? its a 40 gig hard drive!
    -35 celsius maximum operating temperature??? ever heard of summer? It often goes over 35 where I live.
    -And finally the price. Look at the components, lets give 50$ for the box and power supply, 100$ for the motherboard, 40 for the cpu, 100 for the HD, maybe 30$ for some kind of ram, 15 for some wires and 80 for the burner (8x4x32 probably, am I forgetting something? The total of that is 415... 999 anybody?

    But the concept is good, just needs a little tweaking maybe.

    --
    Imperium et libertas
    Autocracy and freedom
    1. Re:Good but some problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra costs:

      * Development time to integrate the components

      * Executive salaries

      * Completely reworking the motherboard several times because of reasons that could be of the type: the audio was crappy, BIOS bugs.

      * Remote control design

      * Front panel design, over and over again

      * Front panel VFD is pricey

      * Front panel switches, design

      * 64M of RAM used to be more than $30

  32. Main Problem by aspillai · · Score: 1

    The main problem I have with these built in recorders is cataloging the music. I find MP3's/OGG to be an excellent compact storage of music. I have a lot of MP3s. Actually, I have more MP3's than I can listen to and keep track of without a tool. For most POP music, the file name is enough for keeping track of pertinent information. But when you get into classical music and some traditional celtic music, the file name isn't enough.

    I'm assuming this hardware will allow me to specify a name for the piece. How about adding scans of the CD jewel case? How about information found in the jacket covers? I would never buy this or other such CD-RW because of that. I'm too poor to buy all the CDs I'd want. So, when I rip music, I try to imitate the orginal CD look as much as possible. Maybe for those people who just want to build a quick and dirty collection, this hardware would be good.

  33. Great Idea - Bump this Up! by Distan · · Score: 1

    Oh man, I'm laughing out loud. I just had a GREAT idea.

    What HP needs to do to make this a must-have home appliance is to embed a Gnutella client in the box. That would be hilarious!

  34. Too expensive. Not enough capacity by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 1
    When the likes of IBM have 100GB consumer hard drives on the market, why should we put up with 40GB ? The electronics on this thing must add up to about $350 retail. So there is one hefty mark-up there.

    Having said that, imagine ripping all your CDs onto this thing and having them go with you wherever you go.

    I wonder if the RIAA know about this ? You can bet they will get their panties in a bunch about it :-(

    1. Re:Too expensive. Not enough capacity by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      "Having said that, imagine ripping all your CDs onto this thing and having them go with you wherever you go."

      Great idea. Think I'll buy an iPod at less than half the price, and do just that.

    2. Re:Too expensive. Not enough capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RIAA is getting half the money for this, why else would i have to pay $999 for this SHIT!!!!!!!

      and gee, it burns at 8X. oh happy joy! :-P

  35. only if I can hack it by elmegil · · Score: 2

    If I can install my own 80G drive, I can put all my CDs into it. That would rock.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:only if I can hack it by sporty · · Score: 2

      Everything is hackable, its just a matter of time of figuring out how. (/zen)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  36. $1000 = not a lot of stuff... by swordboy · · Score: 2

    Microsoft is on top of the game. They'll have an Xbox variant soon that will do all this and then some for lots less. Why does everyone ignore the potential of this market? I'd *love* to have a single box that I could plug the phone, satellite (from any provider, or cable if I prefer), run MP3s, play games, surf the web, and time shift TV content. I'm sure that there is more that I am forgetting, but processing is cheap.

    Sure, there are small projects to bring Linux into this arena but MS is close to making them all dead in the water. Just like IE, I'll be quick to support it since there are no other solutions.

    If only someone in the industry would pull their head out of their ass. Maybe when all the million distros die off... There's just too much duplication of work right now and not enough in the way of making actual inroads.

    Sigh...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:$1000 = not a lot of stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure. but your M$ box will crash a lot, only play encrypted wav files and you'll be putting security patches onto it every few months to prevent skript-kiddies from playing barbara streisand on it over and over and over and over...

  37. Utter pants by innit · · Score: 1

    OH LOOK IT'S A CRAP PC INNA SILVER BOX THAT COSTS A GRAND.

    *bargepole*

    Make a version of that with a network port on the back instead of the hard disk, and halve the price, and then we'll talk. Not before.

    Stuii!

    1. Re:Utter pants by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      You should have actually READ the article before you spewed your BS:

      what's in the box?
      *HP digital entertainment center de100c with HomePNA card
      *ethernet 10/100 baseT card, 56K v.90 modem
      *remote control with 2 AAA batteries
      *20 ft. phone cable, phone line splitter
      *installation placemat and documentation
      *6 ft. AC power cable, 6 ft. stereo and video cables
      *3-pack HP digital audio music CD-R media (700 MB/80min)


      And if that wasn't enough for you:

      * the HP digital entertainment center works great with broadband, home networks, and dial-up Internet service providers

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    2. Re:Utter pants by innit · · Score: 1

      It's still a crap PC in a box that costs a grand.

    3. Re:Utter pants by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'm not saying any different. For HP to charge a grand for the same damn thing I can build for a few undred (and have 10X more usibility) is insane.
      But, as been pointed out a billion times by posters already, this isn't targeted at people like "us" (geeks with too much time and ideas), it's for people that don't have a freakin' clue that this can be easily made for pretty cheap (and that have a hard time infront of an ATM machine...).

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  38. What about copy protection? by wrero · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this has any built in copy protection?

    I for one am saving all of my old stereo equipment, computers, hard drives, etc., because someday I just know that they're going to sneak copy-protection into the hardware, and we won't find out that it's there for a few years... and then, we would have thrown away all our old hardware and we'll be stuck.

    This thing sounds neat, but I wouldn't want to buy it only to find that I couldn't use it for certain songs because the unit thinks that I'm violating a copyright - when, in fact, I'm actually doing things that are allowed under fair use....

    I wonder if they use that internet connection to tell the record companies which songs I have stored, or which songs I've burned onto CD, or how many times I've done it, etc.

    I'm sure I'm just being paranoid, but I'm sure they're going to stick it to us sooner or later.

  39. Whoopee! by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    I can throw together a PC that will do all that and more for half the price.

    Or I could buy a 200 CD jukebox for even less

    So, why is this cool?

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  40. specs by uslinux.net · · Score: 2, Informative


    internal storage
    [definition] 40 GB IDE Ultra DMA drive

    CDRW write speed
    up to 8X

    minimum system requirements
    connection to stereo system with a receiver/amplifier via standard audio jacks, TV with composite video or S-video input|connection to internet service, router and appropriate cables for broadband connection

    internet connectivity
    dial-up: 56K V.90 modem

    processor
    Intel Pentium® II 566MHz Celeron

    music library
    create up to 99 play lists

    internet radio
    listen to worldwide internet radio stations

    music storage
    stores 750 CDs, 9000 tracks, 635 hours of music

    --
    Seems pretty cool, but at almost $1k, that seems pretty pricey for consumer electronics. And, I don't quite like how it's limited to 99 playlists. Also, a basic network interface which would grab a DHCP address (or automatically use something like 10.0.0.1) seems like it would be MUCH more useful than a modem.

    Hacking time, anyone? :-)

    1. Re:specs by KFury · · Score: 2

      Actually, it does have 10/100Base-T built in as well. Check out the spec sheet.

  41. not enough by No-op · · Score: 2

    40G is not enough. something with at least 100 or 200 GB is more appropriate... maybe mirrored as well to ensure data safety. I'd hate to lose my 90GB of music due to a cheap ass IDE drive failing on me.

    I know that sounds a bit silly but for $999 bucks I expect more from them :)

    --
    EOM
    1. Re:not enough by No-op · · Score: 2

      absolutely! you have no idea how those mpeg files build up. err...

      actually, I just download a lot of legally purchased MP3s from www.emusic.com , which has some of the best selection of punk, ska, and hardcore out there, as well as tons of other types of music. It's all legally licensed from smaller labels and indies, like epitaph and asian man records, etc. very cool, and you help support your favorite bands financially.

      I'm sure that's not what you were looking for, but that's your fault not mine :)

      --
      EOM
  42. A cheaper alternative... by RupertJ · · Score: 1

    OK it looks quite nice. But a motherboard, processor, heatsink, 128Mb memory, video card, CDRW, 40gb HD, sound card and case will set you back about £400 (US$575). Plus, you get the fun of coding the front end yourself. You could even go to Bull Electrical and pick up some IR gear and attach it to the serial port for about ten quid too, and hey presto, IR control. The HP's case is lovely, but if it's the actual functionality you're after, you can build it cheaper yourself.

    $1000 dollars seems a lot for something which can be achieved with any bog standard PC. You could even spray paint a GCT-Allwell set top box silver and then replace the DiskOnChip with a cable and 40Gb IDE hard drive and then install Linux or Win98Lite. Plus you get 10/100 NIC and TV-out.

    Alternatively, how about an Acer NT-150 STB, you can normally get these off of ebay etc. for about £20 (US$35)

    Or, you could buy a really nice cd player... :)

    1. Re:A cheaper alternative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why stop there? There is plenty of sand at the beach, get a couple scoops and make your own silicon chips. Then recycle your beverage containers; aluminum makes an excellent conductor for wires and other circuits. Old televison sets can be had for next to nothing, and there are plenty of tranistors and coils inside which with minimal effort will make a dandy power computer power supply.

      Surplus copper-clad circuit boards can be had for pennies at electonic flea-markets. These circuit boards are dandy for etch-it-yourself motherboards and can save you hundreds of dollars over expensive "ready made" units. Yes sir, there is no limit to the money that can be saved with a little old-fashioned ingenuity and "can do" spirit.

    2. Re:A cheaper alternative... by RupertJ · · Score: 1

      Don't mod down the reply to my original message - I thought it was quite funny!

      heheh!

      -Rupert

  43. Consumer [sic] product by crumbz · · Score: 1

    I think this will appeal to older folks and the generally non-technical out there with lots of cash. I can think of plenty of people who will buy something like this because they simply DO NOT KNOW that you can hook a COMPUTER to you STEREO. Whether it succeeds or not depends on the "friendliness" of the interface and if HP can get it demo'd at stores.

  44. that doesn't add up... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 1

    Couldn't I just get a kick-arse sound card with digital out, X feet of optical cable, and hook that into my receiver, running the mp3s straight from my computer, all for far less than half the cost?

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  45. Dupe post... try something more interesting like: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the Winamp3 developer alpha. Pretty nifty so far. Check it out. Much better than day-old news.

  46. BECAUSE by robvasquez · · Score: 0

    Because it's nowhere near as geeky.

    Besides, what do you do when the Ms. wants to hear some Imbruglia, and you want to read Slashdot, look at pr0n, or play Doom 3?

  47. Yeah, so what? by tradez · · Score: 1

    Wow, for only 1,000 bucks I can get something that plays mp3s and also burns cds? OR, i could just use the pc I built for 300 bucks and hook up a cheap sound card to be patched through a reciever. There has to be at least an 800 dollar markup on this and should definately be given the award for Sucker-Christmas-Gift for this coming holliday season.

  48. How is this not Lame? by KurdtX · · Score: 1

    iPod ($400) + 40 gig drive ($100) + CDRW ($100) - Firewire ($100) - Portability ("Priceless").

    I don't know about you, but I'm looking at a big, ugly iPod that costs about $100 more. Maybe this is useful if you can't live with less than your 1000 favorite songs instantly available and don't want to buy two iPods (which would still be cheaper and smaller).

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    1. Re:How is this not Lame? by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      Assuming it could also act as a portable hard drive, the HP model blows the Mac one out of the water.

      Unless, of course, you require your devices to be "pretty".

    2. Re:How is this not Lame? by bbum · · Score: 1

      HP product blows iPod [Apple product] out of the water?

      That'd be a troll if I ever read one... they aren't even in the same *markets*. The iPod is intended to be a portable, secondary music playing device whereas the HP box is intended to be stuck on your stereo, left there, and used as the center for all of your music needs.

      They are *completely* different markets. Get a clue!

  49. Not the first.... by mblase · · Score: 2

    Kenwood released a similar device not too long ago: the Entre entertainment hub. Yeah, it's about twice as expensive, but it's targetted at audiophiles and offers additional features to boot: a graphical user interface that displays on your television, indexing and control of Kenwood's 400-disc DVD/CD player, Internet radio, and homePNA support so you can send audio anywhere else in your house.

    1. Re:Not the first.... by PoiBoy · · Score: 1

      Kenwood != audiophile grade Kenwood has not made anything remotely audiophile grade in decades.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:Not the first.... by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      This comment made me laugh as well. :-)

      Want flashy stereo? Go with a Kenwood. I'll stick with my Marantz.

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
  50. A better implementation than HP or Compaq... by robocord · · Score: 1

    but still too expensive. Kenwood has a product called the Entre Entertainment Hub that truly integrates with a stereo system, controls a DVD changer, and even offers remote listening if you buy the extra Axcess Remote Portal gadget. Unfortunately, the Entre all by itself is $1800 and the other bits that hook up to it are similarly expensive.

  51. No Ethernet by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
    Ooooooh, it's got a shiny 56k modem in it! Fsck me harder. No Ethernet, no chance. I'm tired of all these consumer electronics devices without even a simple cheap-ass 10 mbit Ethernet port. Maybe they don't want to deal with user interface issues of configuring it, but DHCP isn't exactly rocket science, and they could simply require DHCP. I don't need yet another damn modem to fight over my analog lines when I and many others have a perfectly decent LAN behind a NAT/DHCP box with a live internet connection.

    Besides, running things over Ethernet means I can run protocol analyzers and proxies and such to help hack a device. :-)

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  52. 300 CD changer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know which utility (mp3 app) for the pc or MAC can download random tracks from a 300 cd changer?

  53. Jumpin' Jesus on a Pogo Stick by mckwant · · Score: 1

    Get one of these FM modulators, tack it onto a computer that is(presumably) networked to your MP3 jukebox, figger out the tuning, and go from there.

    It probably won't be the highest quality sound, but for $970, I think I can adapt.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  54. It's new. Wait. by mblase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone knows that the first CD players and DVD players cost nearly $1000 or more when they first came out. They come down when they become more popular, the manufacturing process becomes more standardized, and the demand is high enough to justify it.

    As for your $300 CD jukebox, check out the specs on this toy -- internet connectivity, TV display, HomePNA broadcasting, and of course, a larger hard drive. Feature-wise, there's no comparison.

    1. Re:It's new. Wait. by Refrag · · Score: 2

      My DVD player was $400 new, the first week they were available. This probably led to DVD's very fast acceptance rate.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    2. Re:It's new. Wait. by Baconator · · Score: 1

      The key difference here is that that CD players offered high sound quality along with their other features (random access, small size, etc). People were willing to dish out a grand for the latest HI-FI miracle... they're not going to be as excited about the latest LO-FI miracle. It's like spending big bucks on an AM radio... why bother?

    3. Re:It's new. Wait. by InShadows · · Score: 1

      With all these components for home audio systems you still can't beat the RioReceiver (http://www.riohome.com/products/receiver.htm)IMHO .

      You can use your computer as your mp3 server without having to worry about the size of your hard drives. You already have a CD burner on your computer as well. If you have a SO and they are in another room they could be listening to the mp3s on the computer while you are playing the latest FPS. This is accessed via the phone line and you can still receive phone call.

      So this setup also has internet connectivity (computer) and compatible with Ethernet and PNA adapters. The only thing it doesn't have is the TV display. The price is only a mere $199.95 as well.

    4. Re:It's new. Wait. by domc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this thing is a tad bit more complex than a DVD player.

      domc

    5. Re:It's new. Wait. by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      sure. internet connectivity, tv display and crappy lossy compressed sound. sounds like a good trade off.

      not that the $300 cd jukebox sounds all that good, but its going to be better than an mp3 palyer simply because it starts off with better quality source material.

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  55. It's got the right features by KFury · · Score: 2
    Though the price is steep, this does have a great feature set. Everything I looked for is there:
    • 10/100Base-T conectivity
    • Built-in 56K modem
    • Ability to tune in internet radio (through Kerbango or wherever)
    • Ability to mount device on other computers for easy file transfer
    • Nice on-screen management controls (TiFo-style)
    • CDDB Support
    • Ability to burn Audio CDs and MP3 CDs in CD-R or CD-RW
    • Interfaces with USB-equipped MP3 players directly for filling them with music

    Basically this is the box that you feed your CDs into, and it handles all the rest. Later you can grab stuff off via the net, MP3 CD, USB to your player, or Audio CD, (or just play it) and it's just all there.

    In fact, the only thing that I really wish were there that I didn't see would be the ability to use it as a net-radio broadcaster with a web interface, so you could listen to your home collection from work or anywhere. Of course, mounting the share across the net would do almost the same thing, but only for one user.

    Sure $999 is alot, but it's the first real consumer (read not-geek-targeted) device to tackle all these things. There's probably a market at this price, and once that market's saturated, I'll be there to pick one up for $500.
    1. Re:It's got the right features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that price, you can get an iMac with iTunes and a CDRW drive that has all the functionality but with an improved interface. Plus it also runs OS X and is actually a computer that you can use for whatever you want, has ethernet, firewire, video editing, a nice screen, etc.

      This is a no brainer!

    2. Re:It's got the right features by KFury · · Score: 2

      ?It's a no-brainer for you, but for the person with the rackmounted AV closet, this is abetter machine.

      Basically, I'd want this kind of machine over an iMac if it were around $400, but it won't get to $400 without going through this price point first. I'm happy FOR ONCE to not be the guy on the bleeding edge, and reap the benefits for their expense.

  56. Uh... by uradu · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    The "10/100 baseT card" is mentioned right there under "what's in the box", BEFORE the modem. The solution to your problem is *reading*.

    1. Re:Uh... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

      Argh. I read as far as "Internet Connectivity: 56K modem". Well, DUHHH, HP, Ethernet is "internet connectivity" too! Damn ad copy writers.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Uh... by uradu · · Score: 2

      > Well, DUHHH, HP, Ethernet is "internet connectivity" too!

      I know what you mean, but strictly speaking it's not. Ethernet is LAN connectivity technology. I would guess very few people are directly connected to the internet via Ethernet. Cable modems, modems, DSL, sure, but those aren't Ethernet.

  57. On the other hand... by mblase · · Score: 2

    ...is your MP3-recording PC really that much more attractive as a living room appliance?

    1. Re:On the other hand... by Refrag · · Score: 2

      No, but an iPod or a Audiotron are.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  58. RIAA and copy protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that everyone is missing is that the RIAA is implementing copy protection for CDs. From what I've seen so far YOU CANT USE A COMPUTER TO RIP OR PLAY CD's WITH THIS PROTECTION. they soud like crap. So to everyone complaining about how they can get a PC cheeper, get your head out of your arse! Yes it looks like an expensive PC. However If I cant play/rip a cd to a pc (thank you RIAA), the pc is a boat anchor when it comes to MP3. I hope that HP would have enough smarts to implement a system that gets around the RIAA natzis.

  59. Nice but missing some features by crazyj · · Score: 2

    The HP model is nice, but needs some features, such as wireless networking, which means it could ditch the storage and use Samba like the AudioTron does. Check out this device coming out soon that is similar but has a "dockable" remote and wireless networking to your computer which also lets you listen to internet radio such as Live365. Add a CD-RW to the SimpleFi for burning/encoding CDs and you've got my dream device, although visualizations on the TV screen would be nice to have as well.

  60. Ok, German is not going to get this thing? by humps · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure HP won't be selling these things in Germany and, oh, have they not forgotten about copy protected CDs as well? Or have they implemented CloneCD in the OS with auto protection scheme detection?

    humps

  61. My current MP3 solution... I'd love one of these. by Scoria · · Score: 1

    Here's how it works:

    My "gaming and art" machine is connected to my stereo via a wireless connection and my Linux machine has Shoutcast installed. (The architecture of my LAN: a 16 port switch connected to an 802.11b access point; four computers (including the Linux computer) on the switch and two on the WLAN.)

    When I desire to listen to MP3s from my machine (the laptop in the other room) as opposed to those on the gaming machine, I connect to the Shoutcast daemon on the Linux machine that the gaming machine is a client of.

    Music begins streaming, on the stereo's speakers (Klipsch RP-7s) less than twenty seconds later. It's certainly not the best solution, but few can argue the point that it is interesting...

    As for the HP product, I'd love one of these. Contrary to what the average Slashdotter may say, HP's products *do* hold up very well. I also don't know how many brand names support twelve year old printers and four year old digital cameras with new drivers. ;)

    One more thing: I am aware that some Slashdotters are the "efficient spender ;) ;)" types (as are a large portion of all human beings) and have probably had poor experiences with low-end HP products. Just remember that you get what you pay for; from what I hear that statement is especially applicable to HP. ;)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  62. Uncle Joe might buy one by ucblockhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Because Uncle Joe doesn't know how to build a PC, and hasn't a clue about networking. Uncle Joe knows how to hook up a stereo, though.

    "Slashdot posters" aren't a big enough market to pursue. "High-end stereo buyers", on the other hand, are.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Uncle Joe might buy one by turd191 · · Score: 1

      You can buy a brand new computer for less than $500. With the way the economy is at this time this is a much more practical decision. For another $150 (this includes the installation) you can add a highe end sound card that will allow you to export out to to a TV or Home stereo system.

    2. Re:Uncle Joe might buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is easier:
      Pushing the on button and hitting play.
      Or pushing the on button, waiting a minute or so, double clicking the WinAmp icon (or digging through menus and then clicking), and then clicking on play?
      PC loses on this one.

      Or how about setup?
      Open the box, plug it in (speakers, power, net), put a CD in, hit "rip CD".
      Or open the box, plug in 4 different boxes (monitor, PC, keyboard, mouse) into themselves, speakers, power, and net, start it up, connect to the internet, download WinAmp (for space's sake I'm assuming the user knows the exact URL to go to to download the software. Searching and navigating a web site would be a few more steps), install WinAmp, download a ripper program (If WinAmp doesn't have one built in), install the ripper, put a CD in the drive, open the ripper, click "rip CD", select folder to save the mp3s in, click "OK".
      PC loses again. And if you want to use linux, it's even more complex (unless you're used to linux. FYI, most people aren't).

      For simply playing mp3 music (what the de100c is designed specifically to do), the de100c beats the PC. Although money-wise the PC wins, since it costs half as much. The success of this device all depends on whether people (average people, not Slashdotters) are willing to pay more for something that's easier to use.

      Personally, I think that unless they drop the price to $3-400 the only people who will buy this are CEOs with money to burn. Not many people are interested in mp3s for non-portable use, and even fewer would spend $300+ more* for ease of use.

      *most low-end prebuilts cost $600-700. Most people don't want to build their own PC.

    3. Re:Uncle Joe might buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell can it beat the PC. It is made by HP. Their consumer level electronics are crap. I would but an E-Machine first. Leave stand alone audio to sony, pioneer and kenwood.

    4. Re:Uncle Joe might buy one by creep · · Score: 1

      "High-end stereo buyers", on the other hand, are.

      If someone is a "high-end stereo buyer". I seriously doubt they are going to spend money on a device that plays MP3s. True audiophiles despise MP3 (I'm not one of them, that's just what I've heard..)

    5. Re:Uncle Joe might buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, leave stand alone audio to Onkyo, McIntosh, and the like.

  63. Just one more feature ... by termchimp · · Score: 1
    ... and I'll buy it: Give me a WinAmp-esque Visualizations feature for the TV it's connected to. When I'm having a party, the trippy starbursts and color smears are a must on the big screen.

    I kinda doubt this box has the power to handle that sort of graphics, though.

    --
    My spoon is too big!
  64. Where's the special distro? by dourk · · Score: 1

    While I have _zero_ programming skills, and can barely get around in linux, I do use the smoothwall distro for firewalling.

    I've heard everyone talk about how you can build one of these on your own, but I know I wouldn't have the patience to get it figured out. It'd be great to see a special distro that you just install on a machine with the right hardware (soundblaster, tv-out, ir, big drive), and just have it work. That'd be worth paying for.

    --
    Wake up.
  65. SWEET toy by VEGETA_GT · · Score: 1

    Dam this looks like a fun toy. But just one problem, I don't know If I like that maney songs

    >:)=

  66. uh, Taco? Are you asleep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHY MUST WE BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME STORIES OVER AND OVER AGAIN?!

    1 POST IS FINE, 2 IS LAME!!

    IF YOU ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE 1ST POST, THAN WAIT FOR SOMETHING BETTER, BE A LITTLE DESCRIMINATING...

    YOUARETHEWEAKESTLINK...GOOD-BYE!

  67. Re:My current MP3 solution... I'd love one of thes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we supposed to say "Nice hardware" or something...?

    Just 'cuz u gots the bill$ to waste dont make ya 31337.

  68. One thousand dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have one of these... IT'S CALLED A COMPUTER, and it does so much more than play mp3s and make CD's.

    Hello!!!!

  69. Heavy! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This must be really heavy equipment if it exerts a force causing a 40g acceleration!

    <EMILY-LATELLA>
    Ohh... you meant 40GB! That's very different! Never mind.
    </EMILY-LATELLA>

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:Heavy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "4, Interesting" ?! ... somebody must still be hung over from the big Halloween party last night...

    2. Re:Heavy! by DigitalDragon · · Score: 1

      Well, and it is not somebody, this must be like 3 people at least. Somebody, please change that to Funny, cuz it's not funny anymore.

      --
      http://dtum.livejournal.com
  70. Re:My current MP3 solution... I'd love one of thes by Scoria · · Score: 1

    You see, all of that hardware cost less than the HP box. :)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  71. When will they get it right... by silversurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know I'm fighting the very premise of creating a product line that so many manufacturers follow. Before I go plunk down $1000 on a device like this, I want it to do this first:

    • HD Space (rec/playback) for Music (of varying formats, AIFF, WAV, MP3)
    • HD Space (rec/playback) for Video (Tivo style)
    • DVD/player/burner/CD-RW unit
    • Standard case that fits in with most stereo components in look and feel
    • Quiet Fans
    • Digital I/O (S/PDIF, Optical)
    • NO MORE INTERNET VIA WEBTV OR AOLTV, UltimateTV tries to do this, it's a waste.
    • 802.11 wireless capability so the device will be networked so that I can xfer files to/from my computer directly to video and audio storage, and manage the files on the device.
    • *OPTIONAL* Tivo type service. I don't really need Tivo Guide Service, so I'd like to be able to use my recorder without it.

    Give me a device like that and I'll stop using my computer for the same thing.

    -silversurf
  72. Subtle variation on the same theme by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2
    Having a built-in Gnutella client would be waving the red flag in front of the RIAA bull. I would rather see them include an embedded file or FTP server. Then you could run whatever P2P program you want on another PC, and deposit all the juicy MP3s on the HP audio gizmo. How about an HTTP "management interface" with a back door that lets you browse and upload/download the MP3 content?

    Even more subtle would be to use IIS as the embedded webserver. Then HP could blame M$ for all of the hacking and piracy, while selling thousands upon thousands of these little boxes!

  73. Guns 'n Roses: A Failure Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well let's examine what a band needs to succeed:

    1. Musicianship. They need to be able to play their instruments above the average level. Uncheck.

    2. Material. They've got to have some music in their rep that's of more than passing interest. Uncheck.

    3. Style. They have to have a look, attitude, or schtick that is in some way striking or notable. Check. They've got the attitude that they're the Only Band That Matters.

    Because they don't have 1 or 2, and all they've got for 3 is arrogance, well you can construct the rest of the syllogism from there.

    I would only say something this insulting to someone who put Troll in his name.

  74. The timing of this could not possibly be worse by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...in several ways.

    One, in case the marketing folks at H/P haven't noticed, three days ago consumer confidence was just reported to be at it's lowest point in a decade. A very bad time to push a $999 device that doesn't really add all that much value. If I had a thousand dollars, which I don't, there are about thirty devices in line before this one. Hell, a "beater" used car for the winter should be in line before this thing.

    Two, with his dep't tag and repeated pushing of exactly this sort of consumer toy, it suggests that Taco is lusting after these $999 devices, which is what he shouldn't be admitting during a time when he is trying to leverage the tech news weblog model into more intrusive revenue generation. It makes me want to turn off the ads in my /. preferences, and not join any sort of membership model.

    I have given a lot to sites through the Amazon and Paypal tip jars. I support sites that really need the money and are using it for bandwidth and hardware, not expensive toys. Back in the day, I even sent Taco a graduation gift, which represented the /. tip jar of its time.

    At this point, other webmasters are quitting the business or turning their sites into non-profit ventures that don't support even their own salary. I don't deny anyone the right to make money, but I do have to decide what to do with my own limited resources.

  75. what the fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is "40g"? did we have 40"m" before today? Its GB, goddammit

  76. Why compress at all? by glindsey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When it comes to a component that's going to be a part of a high-quality stereo system, why bother with MP3 compression at all? MP3's are great for the typical computer speakers, but get into higher-end sound equipment and you can really notice the compression artifacts. Yes, I realize that you can store considerably more music using MP3 compression, but if you're going to spend $999 on something, why not build a dedicated system with twin 80GB hard drives and store the CD tracks directly? You still have the room to store over 230 CDs worth of audio (and that's assuming each CD was filled to capacity, which often doesn't happen with music CDs), and you don't suffer the quality degradation from compression. Add the option to play files over a network link (either compressed or uncompressed), and THEN you have something worth that grand. IMHO, of course.

  77. I stand corrected.. by Technician · · Score: 2

    It does come with a 10/100 ethernet port. But it looks like it is only used with it's web browser for broadband access thru your supplied router. They are tight lipped about what format you can post your music online. We need a good review of this in action on getting and putting MP3's to and from this device. We also need a positive answer. Will it burn MP3's on a CDR as MP3's and not a music CD? In other words.. Can it export the MP3's?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  78. Let me get this straight by IAmATuringMachine! · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Apple releases a portable and sleek MP3 player for (an admittedly ovepriced) 400 bucks and it is "lame," whist HP releases a shitty computer in a smaller box and Taco is all "I totally need a review model."

    Taco, you are a fuck. You've let your little media conglomerate go to your head. Be a journalist or an evangelist, but don't be both... it doesn't become you.

    --
    "Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes."
    -E. W. Dijkstra
  79. Whatever happened to the Zapstation by anewsome · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a clue if the Zapstation from Zapmedia will ever make it to market. I actually slapped my credit card down on one about this time last year. They were actually hopeful of getting them shipped by LAST Christmas. It's over a year later and they still can't seem to get it together.

    1. Re:Whatever happened to the Zapstation by SeanMahan · · Score: 1

      Thanks for asking ;) We just finished production of our first run and our online store will be up by the end of next week. I'm a developer at Zap so I'm a little biased. The specs are online here but some of the specs are now out of date (we use a 800 MHz Celeron, 24-bit audio, and no modem). We still have the old website up (which sucks) but that will be changing next week too. The OS is, of course, linux 2.4.x and we'll be sending one to Rob to review if he's interested.

  80. I was on a focus group for one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Now that this has officially been released, I suppose I am no longer under NDA.

    About 9 months ago I was on a focus group to review these things. It was supposed to be four sessions in four months or something, and then we got the device, but I was "dismissed" after the first session and told not to come back. I think I pissed them off by telling them that if this device wasn't open, it would be hacked.

    They were very interested in how we would respond to advertising that was downloaded to it and played for us based on our music choices. The group said downloading concert info about the bands we liked was fine, most of the people didn't really mind more annoying ads, but I said that if there wasn't a way to opt out of the ads I would firewall its outgoing network connection.

    They asked if it would be ok if the box reported back certain user preferences, and I said that would be fine if they were totally upfront about what information was sent. I told them that lying would just get them in trouble, because we would see every packet this thing sent over the wire, and would raise a stink about any unexplained ones.

    I think the final insult is when they asked the price we would pay. Most of the other people said $1000 or $1200, but I said that I would pay $300, because had built similar devices for $300. That was a bit unfair, because $300 doesn't include the surplus and out of date computer pieces used from work, and their box was certainly nicer than what I had put together. At the time their box had a 20GB drive, and a CD burner, so it would have been more fair of me (on then prices) to have said $450-500.

    The ironic thing is, that I have never needed my own home mp3 box (the ones I built were for friends), but just yesterday I started getting pieces together for one. I think it'll cost me $80-120. Of course I am using a surplus K6-2 (clocked down to 200Mhz, no fan!) scrounged from work. The $80-120 is for a 40-60GB 5400 hard disk. My box won't have CD-RW, modem, HomePNA, etc., but I don't want those things, why should I pay for them?

    I think their main problem was they had tried to pack the room with people who were very into music, yet somewhat tech savy. Unfortunately I am very tech savy, and only somewhat into music, so instead of spending my time dreaming about the virtues of a 20GB CD changer (besides I already had the equivilant in my notebook) I spent my time dreaming about all of the evil things they would be doing with this box.

    1. Re:I was on a focus group for one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should be ashamed of yourself for questioning their motives!

      Next time, remember to bend over like the other consumers!

  81. What I really want by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The HP gear is close to what I want but almost certain to be compromised with DRM restrictions.

    What I really want is something that is a larger equivalent of my Archos device. I want it to appear on the network as a PC with a large shared hard drive.

    I would want a minimum of 100Gb of storage.

    Alternatively a completely diskless pod with about 16Mb ram, an 802.11b network access point, sound output and some sorta TV interface would serve the same purpose. It could pull the toones off my PC server. With a larger buffer (128Mb or more) it could do video as well.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:What I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THEN MAKE IT YOURSELF YOU WHINY LITTLE PUNK.

      You can make all that yourself if you got out of your Mom's basement. Of course, if you did, you'd notice that there is more to life than amassing the most MP3's out of any 15 year-old in your high school, and decide IT IS NOT WORTH YOUR TIME.

    2. Re:What I really want by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I would want a minimum of 100Gb of storage.

      Well have no fear, this unit has 320Gb (40GB) of storage.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:What I really want by Bruj0 · · Score: 1

      Get a 4U rack and buy the part one by one, thats how i build all my computers and they are 100% rock solid.No need to buy a NetAplaince :)

      --
      http://securityportal.com.ar
    4. Re:What I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and when they make that you will want 200GB or 400GB and then bluetooth built in.

      Yadda...yadda....

      Take what you get and stop bitching about what you want...

      Make what you want, it's called a PC running linux with CAJUN as a frontend. (and CAJUN doenst require a lame TV to see the menus.)

      get off your butt and make what you want instead of whining that they didint read your mind .

    5. Re:What I really want by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      THEN MAKE IT YOURSELF YOU WHINY LITTLE PUNK.

      Hey, most people tend to appreciate my input on requirements analysis. That is probably why I am cited as contributing to umpteen RFCs.

      Some of us have other things to do than build MP3 players, not because we don't want to but because there is only so much time in the day.

      The whole idea of open source is that someone may well have built what you need already so why not share?

      Someone may well get a kick out of building a dedicated Linux based MP3 appliance and uploading the source.

      Of course if (as appears likely) you don't have to spend any time with a girl friend, or working, engaging in social activities or personal hygiene then you probaly have enough time to build every geek toy yourself.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  82. Is this how we're really going to do this? by aengblom · · Score: 1

    In the past (and future) couple weeks there have been three very similar products, but only slightly different functions. Replay, Xbox and now this. What sucks is they're pretty damn expensive and they are limited to certain tasks. As far as I can tell though, they all require the same things. Processing power, a big hard drive and some proprietary parts to make things easier. But they're mostly a PC. Really, how long are we going to do this before peole realize the PC is still a better way to go. Instead of a $500 Desktop, how long is it really before we have $1500 networked server that can do all of these functions. Put a "cd reading unit" where you want you're stereo and some basic controls, but the unit in your basement throws it on a hard drive. The kids need to do their homework while you pay your bills? Plug in a new monitor. Want to record TV or play games, just purchase certain propreitary technology, but have it plug into the standard processing and HD. Yes, obviously there isn't quite enough power today to do all of these functions and wiring would be trick, but centralizing them seems the way to go and adding $2000 to a mortgage won't hurt too much. Adding net access to your workshop, kitchen, and the kids rooms for the cost of a few monitors? Priceless--err cheap ;-)

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  83. It runs Linux actually....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a custom motherboard. Support for optical and digital audio, SVideo, etc. (Which is pretty much the only cool thing about it). Everything is done using Real Audio/Video technology. The thing that sucks about it is that all searching/input can only be done via the remote. Makes looking for "Killing is my business and business is good" a royal pain. I have one and overall, I give it a "C-". If it was $200 I might pick one up.....

  84. "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." by karma+corruptor · · Score: 0

    uhmmm, yeah right. Problem is, this is all stuff that has been out for a while, or, better yet, BEEN POSTED ON /. BEFORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! cmdr. taco sux rox!!!

    --
    YOUARETHEWEAKESTLINK...GOOD-BYE!
  85. An even better deal.. by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

    I recently purchased a Rio SP250 player from SonicBlue. It supports CDs and CDRs and CDRWs and WinAmp playlists. Now, for $170 for the player, plus $60 for 200 CDs, I'm at 120+ gig of storage for $230 bucks, plus it's portable...and I can always increase my collection. The Rio also supports WMA (eek) and has an FM tuner. With the line out, I can hook it up to any stereo system. SL

  86. Television abstention. [Offtopic] by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    yes, the fact that I don't own a TV set *does* make me a better person.

    Why?

    Does it mean that you have more time to read and actually engage in some sort of mentally stimulating activity?

    Or does this simply mean that you're a pretentious git going for whatever snooty "I'm better than you" points you can get?

    It's an interpretation thing, I suppose.

    --saint

    1. Re:Television abstention. [Offtopic] by quartz · · Score: 1

      Both.

  87. Sellout. by ooPo · · Score: 0

    Taco is a bitch to corporate sponsorship. He'll bend over for the latest in technology.

  88. In related news... by cooperj72 · · Score: 1
    Uninitiated consumers are still getting milked by
    the corporate electronics world for not
    recognizing an overpriced obsolete product when
    it hits the shelves.

    I hope it looks sweet like an iMac
    or something... cause then impulse buying really kicks in!

    -J

  89. Pure provocation... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    This is so much pure provocation, it so sublime...

    I mean, waving such a big red flag in front of the RIAA is bound to generate interesting times.

    Now, let's see what happens when a progressive technological company takes a collision course with an obsolete industry based on artificial information scarcity...

  90. Copy Protected CDs by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    and when all cd's are copy protected this does what for us for that 900 bucks? RIAA will obsolete every pc based cdrom drive before they are done..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  91. Hurray! by trongey · · Score: 2

    A $1k device that can store 200+ hours of degraded music!

    On the other hand, one could buy a couple of Sony 400 CD changers for $400 each. Since we're talking about a component for your home sound system the better sound is worth the extra space.

    MP3 is small (=portable) so why not use it where it works best? You planned on leaving the CD's at home anyway, right?

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  92. WTF is a wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $ man -k wife
    wife: nothing appropriate

    1. Re:WTF is a wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard tales -- whispered between geeks, never aloud -- that there exist other types of human beings known as "women". Supposedly they are soft and warm, and capable of rubbing your shoulders when you get tired. Some even say that they cook meals and clean your house for you.

      Personally, I think it's a load of bull. No way something like that could exist, although I do wonder what these "NAKED TEEN GIRLS" are that I keep seeing in my e-mails.

    2. Re:WTF is a wife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lie!

  93. How about this as an alternative by aclarke · · Score: 1

    How about this for an alternative:

    AMD Duron 750 with 256MB RAM: $390
    SoundBlaster Audigy Platinum: $165
    40 GB drive: $90
    wireless keyboard and mouse: $45 on uBid
    DVD drive: $40
    wireless network adapter: $115 (SMC SMC2602W)
    cheap video card (you just need to run 640x480) with tv-out: $35 on eBay
    Your Favourite OS: $free

    Total: $879.

    And that's with no shopping around, with almost all parts new, and some pretty bloody nice ones at that (sb audigy, wireless lan, for example). With THIS, you can play mp3 files (without the digital rights protection), AND

    - play video games on your big-screen tv
    - surf the web (if you need to)
    - play dvds on your tv
    - play all those movies you don't download from morpheus because that would be illegal
    - feel very cool because you built your own wireless media server
    - control the box on your tv using the wireless keyboard and mouse or VNC/telnet/ftp/whatever in from another computer
    - umm, gee, hmm, what else can you do with a computer? that's about all I can think of...
    - oh yeah, save $120 off the cost of the HP unit.

  94. right direction, wrong application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been thinking about starting my own company to get the ball rolling on LARGE storage MP3 devices. While I'm psyched someone FINALLY decided to do it, a fixed unit with a cd-rw or cd-r drive is the wrong application.

    What we need:
    Portable 50gb unit weighing under 2.5lbs with pc connection (via firewire, usb2.0, usb1.0, whatever) with stereo outs about the size of early larger sony cd-players (I'm thinking of the old sony car discman here). LCD management screen and approriate controls, all for $300 or less.

    Make this product, and I guarantee you will have the fastest adoption curve in the history of media.

    I can't think of anything more attractive than the idea of a device I can store ALL my cds on to take on the road. Imagine rolling out for a weekend to a friend's, and knowing you have your ENTIRE music collection to drive with, play there, WHATEVER!

    God, I can't wait till someone develops a cheap solid state drive... maybe flash memory will drop low enough to make it feasible soon.

    -rat

  95. Are you SURE there's no DRM? What about later? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    The PDF says "*Intended only for use with your original music and other lawful applications."

    This opens the way to "stealth downgrades"--you might buy a model that lacks DRM initially, then suddenly find out that a firmware upgrade was required--to access your ISP, perhaps--and that the upgrade installed restrictive DRM. And you'd have no recourse, because they'd point to that sentence and say "we never said it would store music that it doesn't think you own..."

  96. 40G not 40g by AntiNeutrino · · Score: 1

    listen

    if you say "A 40g" i think "wow what a light-weight device"

    I click on the link and see this husge thing
    you mean 40G!

    --
    I can't even remember what it was I came here to get away from - Bob Dylan
  97. 802.11 Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    My living room has neither a phone line nor an ethernet jack. My home network is 802.11 based.




    Are there any stereo component MP3 players that support 802.11 yet?


  98. Empeg (Re:It's new. Wait.) by BuGless · · Score: 1

    And yet, both are still an easy match for the Empeg with it's unparalleled hackability and features.

    1. Re:Empeg (Re:It's new. Wait.) by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      except, of course, that they have stopped making them...

  99. The price is new by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

    Back when the previous article was posted, the DEC wasn't for sale yet, and the price hadn't been announced. So there is some news in this article.

  100. For $999... by belgar · · Score: 1

    Get an iMac with a CDRW. Then the box will at least look good (if old), and do more than this piece of trash.

    --
    What does it mean to wake out of a dream
    and be wearing someone else's shorts?
    BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
  101. Why? by WiggyWack · · Score: 0

    And since I already have a computer, I should buy this because.....?

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  102. One can do even better than that... by cduffy · · Score: 2

    ...with lossless compression. Something like FLAC or Shorten will permit something in the range of 3x better compression with no loss whatsoever.

    Pity that none of the currently available consumer devices support anything like that (or even Vorbis, which as lossy compression goes is pretty damn sweet).

  103. $999? --shame on the Taco. by ahfoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Jeez that's crazy to someone in Taiwan right now.
    Doesn't anybody read Anandtech or Tom's hardware? The guts of the Xbox were done by Nvidia and Nvidia and Via are both pointed at a low price point --damn the US or Europe. They want PCs in growth markets and that's only going to happen outside the US and at much lower price points than what people, apparently the Taco among them, in rich countries can afford to say --oh gee, what a bargain at $999! How eighties.
    It has jack shit to do with people in LA, SF, NewYork Chigago or Northern Europe getting a good bargain or whatever lateral debate you care to dwell on that has to do with me me me the American consumer. Low hardware prices are about growth markets because a growing market is paradise for the companies on top of it. Places like China, India and South America can't take the current entry points for PCs and related digital entertainment devices, yet their populations are vast and the chances of coming up with a few hundred bucks for the works are considerable if they can get a nice cheap box that really has everything.
    So, let's define everything from the rich comsumer's perspective too. A modular solution could work for both markets if it had the following.
    1. Gigabit ethernet so they're stackable to increase sales in rich countries while dropping unit prices to the floor to make them accessible in growth markets.
    2. In-house distros to make Stacking them easy on the software side and useful for 3D gaming. Some say it's all in the video card, but is that really the full story? These beasts would already be using the latest from NVidia. Complex textures and animations can always use more clock cycles.
    3. And the rest of that shit they ought to have, multi-Gig CPUs in boxes a quarter that price, RAM is so damn cheap here. I just bought a 256Meg SDRAM for nine bucks! The 512 sticks are forty bucks. Where the hell is Taco seeing this as a deal? A 20GigHD is a fucking hustle if anything.
    Obviously the /. editors focus a bit too much on Japan and don't really understand the economics of the place their toys come from. Nichia is cool, but the dude is at Santa Barabara now. Drop the Japan consumer fetish thing because it's so not happening. Really. Prices have to come down. Cheerleading about this is rude.
    Having enjoyed a nice rant, I must confess I never played with one. Perhaps they are cool. And some cool people get off on burning money so whatever. But I suspect hardware is selling like shit because the markets aren't impressed with what gets touted as a deal these days. Where's the 160Gig HDs?
    I'm saying sell 8-Way rack mounts at Costco for like $2999. All it would take is an in-house distro with Mosix doing something, anything with all the CPUs at the same time so you could use it in the marketing. Somebody would have to pay to get it done right so it would be workable for mass consumption. I know, I know, we're not there yet. But damn, it's got to be happenin' soon. I always assumed VALinux was going to do something like this, but it never happened. Seems easy though, stick one of these worthless 20Gig IDEs in each of those cases and bang! You advertise it as $160Gig system. Let's say you make the hard drives on like four nodes into jukeboxes and the rest is just for fun and games and let's not forget word processing!
    Okay, in that case, I'm all for spending the cash. It's where the market should go. Overpriced special purposed toys are just a diversion from the larger entertaiment potentials that will only come with excessive power lying around waiting to be put to use. At the same time, it will provide a solution to the poorer countries. Everybody wins except all the cultures that get squashed out by western influences, but those make great documentaries afterwards.

  104. j00... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    r0x0r!

  105. Other Options? by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 1
    Okay, so you mentioned the Rio Reciever. Taco mentioned the Audiotron.

    Anyone out there have one of the SlimDevices?
    There was a buzz when it was mentioned earlier. But I haven't heard from anyone that bought one since.

    I rather like the idea of streaming from a computer over ethernet better than the HP solution of having the HD fixed in the device.

    For one thing, I have much more storage on the computer. Most of my interacting with the MP3 files will be done on the computer anyway, and I already have a CD-R on it. I would suspect that I have greater control over playlists and the like from a computer than the HP device.

    Then there is the issue of DRM which I have more control over on my computer. As this is a consumer device, I presume they expect that most people will rip their files in the device's CD-RW drive (although it includes a NIC for HomePNA, most consumers are the 12:00-blinking-set and may not even bother with that) at which time the file can be marked.

    In fact, the only thing the HP device seems to do that one of the other products won't is act kinda like a WebTV for internet music (although the only connection is through a v.90 modem. *ICK!*).

    That said, can I get a bit more input on the RioReceiver, the Auditron, and especially the SlimDevices from people that have them?

    --

    ______
    Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

  106. Features (was Re:Good but some problems.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's funny how the RIAA has companies running so scared that they can only pretend to release innovative products.

    Let's take a look at what the DE100 really lets you do:

    • You can buy music online (for money) and have it stored on an encrypted hard-drive.
    • You can copy your music to CDRW prepaid media (more RIAA taxes)
    • You can browse a specific web site to find music you like using the interface that that site provides. No other sites are accessible, nor can you get music from any other location. (could be for money, but currently free)
    • You can get images of the cover art and listings of the track titles from an online database. (same)
    • You can rip CD's to the encrypted hard-drive for later playback. (free but closed)
    • You can copy MP3's from the hard-drive to specific portable MP3 players that support DRM. (free but closed)

    So what is all the fuss about? This is a walled garden for digital music. There are a couple of nifty features, but you can't get at the data to do anything new with the device; it is a completely closed system.

    My PC may be ugly as a stereo component, but at least it is open.

  107. Ogg Vorbis support by pointwood · · Score: 2

    I bet it doesn't support Ogg Vorbis (unless Bruce Perens something to do with this...) which basically means that this is another useles product for me.

  108. Whats the point anyway by weaponx71 · · Score: 1

    Why are companies building and releasing products like this any way? If all of us are letting the recording industry copy protect a CD so that even if you own it you can copy from it, then there is no point in ever making or buying a MP3 player/recorder.
    Is it just me or does it seem that the CD copy protection scam is going ignored while every one else is blinded by this company or that company putting out the "Latest, Greatest" thing to handle all your MP3 needs?
    This seems like a good way to get around the DMCA because its a licensed company, and not a "general hardware element of a computer system like CD-Roms". But it still will not matter because the medium being used for CDs won't allow copying of any kind with any kind of hardware.

  109. The AudioRequest ARQ1 by hmckee · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time there was a machine called the AudioRequest ARQ1 that did everything but the burning and had support for visualizations. I'm certain you could have hacked it to add a CD-R drive, too. All for under $800. ThinkGeek once carried them, but the company that made them decided to upgrade to the high-end business and now sells a rack-mount device for triple the price. So sad, because it was a much better device and could even run Linux.

    See the official announcement here
    http://www.request.com/CEOLetter.html

    -harry

  110. Mp3 Network Player with ALARM CLOCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Any ideas what would be a good MP3 network player with an alarm clock feature? Any links or posts I would really appricate.

  111. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you'd still have an ugly-assed PC sitting next to your rack of other audio gear. It would suck. Trust me.

  112. Why not just buy a used 486? by juju2112 · · Score: 1

    I just run an RC cable from my sound card's audio out port to my stereo's auxillary in.

    Cost to me: $1.50 for cable.

    And these guys want $1000?

    I mean, I can see the argument that you can't listen to music while playing games this way. But hey..just buy an old 486 with a sound card for $50-$100 and put it in an out of the way place near your stereo?

  113. HP Consumer Electonics == *Junk* by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    Right off the shelf. I will guess the "one year limited warranty" is stretching the reliability factor normally associated with their "consumer" products. A nearly undisputable fact is that when a consumer buys the extended warranty, it's another 10% of the system price. That tells me that HP is solvent on this transaction assuming a less-than-10% failure rate.

    HP, IMHO, is the M$ of hardware. Sure you can pay big $$$ for production grade servers, workstations, and network gear - but what about the crap they push to Joe Sixpack and his family?

    Maybe they should have bought Packard Bell...oh wait, maybe they did? My point is, throughout the latter 90's, I had a $45/hr portal-to-portal ad-hoc contract with a company they (and PB, IBM, Compaq, etc.) subcontracted the warranty work to. Best case scenario: I'd go onsite to replace a motherboard, only to find it was the modem that fried causing *no power on* conditions. Lame techs, not asking what the weather was last time the box worked.

    Worst case scenario: I'd go onsite to replace a HD (quantum==junk) only to find that the 2" fan in the low-profile Pavilion desktop had failed, causing the already-doomed junk drive to fry. Hmm, tech could have asked "Do you hear any noise besides the beeps? Feel any air coming out the back?"

    Of course, these last two incidents indicate poor tech support along with "shit for parts". The majority of my service calls involved dead Quantum fireballs, etc, or toasted motherboards for no apparent reason. I was honest with the poor saps that bought the boxes for their family, either extending their credit for a family Xmas present, or using their tax refund, blah, blah.

    Another factor is that now that they own Compaq (with a rep for high vs. low end stuff about equal to the above), then why should we expect any other result than what I've noted? They probably have warehouses full of crap CD-RWs and *shit* HDs, not to mention over-produced "tiny" motherboards, and this product is the result of re-structuring and inventory reduction. I *could* be wrong. Your mileage may vary.

    Go ahead and buy one of these $1000 boxes ($999 is an insult to your intelligence) - They've already sold you the extended warranty, so to speak. BTW, the folks who purchased that for the Pavilions were treated like...(you get the pic - no socio-ethnic slurs here ;-).

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  114. 40 what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is 40g? 40 grams? 40 gigibit?

    Oh, you meant 40GB. OK. Standards, people. Standards.

  115. 802.11b solution... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    Right now, my DSL "modem" and Firewall/WAP sit in my study with one of the computer, and we use the wireless for the laptops. (I live in an 700 sq. ft. apartment, so for a home, YMMV) The plan is to move the DSL/Firewall into the entertainment center, which happens to be in the middle of the apartment because of the layout.

    Originally, I was going to use 802.11b to get connectivity to the HTPC, etc., but with the growing availability of ethernet support in devices, I concluded that I should have a non 802.11b connection in the entertainment center. Their already is a phone line run back there to support the Replay, so splitting it and running the DSL there is trivial, and I will eventually have 3 devices in the system that need connectivity.

    The Gamecube is going to support an ethernet addon, some sort of MP3 player may make it into my system (sure the HTPC - home theater pc - could do it, but it creates a UI nightmare... although having a Pronto makes life easier), and the HTPC obviously needs connectivity. I concluded that the USB-802.11b connection will be adequate for the docking station that's for the study, as well as the second computer.

    Yeah, my freaky apartment has a docking station for my work computer, my fiancee's old PC that she uses for her Windows apps, my HTPC for computer gaming on the television, my laptop out of the docking station, and the fiancee's iBook. I guess it is a problem that I love technology for technology's sake, oh well.

    The problem with 802.11b is that unless you have an intelligence antennae system, reception blows. My laptop whines at places that the iBook is fine at. Apple's engineering is impressive.

    802.11b is amazing though, and more stuff should support it. I would love to get some of the LCD-based computers if I could get a good 802.11b setup, so I could display rotating digital photographs throughout the apartment. Oh well, one day.

    Alex

  116. An iMac would be better. by Soong · · Score: 1

    $999: 500MHz G3, 20GB disk, firewire, usb, cd-rw, built in 15" monitor, 128MB ram, 10/100 10bT, 56k. MacOS X with iTunes beats ugly HP box for user interface.

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
  117. I bet this will not last 4 months. by ioman1 · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't think this product will last. Someone could just a buy a computer that does the same features for a lot less. $999 is a pretty steep price too. If company's want to make a lasting product that incorporates computer functions into a home theater entertainment center, they will have to offer something new and exclusive.

  118. This is a Great Product by ablair · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...if it retails for $500. At $1000, as I'm sure many people have pointed out before you can buy a PC with a much more than the 566MHz Celeron and 40GB hard drive. The PC will also do a heck of a lot more than just store 9000 tracks and burn CDs; plus you won't be required to see their ads and can use CompuServe, AOL, or free ISPs if you want to, unlike with this unit. Not that I would want to use those ISPs, but HP is cutting, what... 50% of US internet users out of their customer pool this way? Great economics.

    Apple may get similarly criticised for cutting out non-Mac users (95%!) out of their iPod customer pool, and also for overpricing the portable 5Gig iPod ($399) But we're dealing with apples and oranges here: Apple's motivation is to add value to owning a Mac and be innovative at the same time, to differentiate themselves further in the market. With no uniqueness, this HP product will find itself lost in the consmer woods.

    And Cmdr Taco, didn't you say "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." in your coverage of the iPod? But for this (unquestionably much "lamer") product you say "I totally need a review model! I saw this thing at the last LinuxWorld and it looked good..." Spltt! Ack!! Barf!!!

    Put down the crack pipe.

  119. me too by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    In addition to mp3 jukebox and DVD my living room PC acts like a TiVo (thanks to ATI's All-In-Wonder) and an arcade game machine (thanks to MAME). Of course it still looks like a PC and I don't like having to control it with a wireless keyboard, but it definitely is more functional than any dedicated device.

    What I really need is a slick black case, a programmable remote and a TV with VGA input.

  120. Sampo DVD player with IDE hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A much cheaper alternative with more features and functionality is the new Sampo DV631CF DVD player. It has a built in Compact Flash reader intended for viewing pics from a digital camera. The CF reader is just a standard IDE device and is easily replaced with an IDE hard drive. With this setup you can play MP3, JPEG, and MPEG video files on your TV through the Sampo DVD player. Check it out at http://www.area450.com

  121. A 40g drive? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Do they really plan on accelerating this system at 40g's?

    That's a fine achievement, but a lot more than I think most portable ogg/MP3 players will be subjected to under normal conditions.

    Hang on, perhaps it's a drive that only weighs 40 grams? Now that would be very useful, as weight is your enemy when designing portable equipment.

    Oh, did you mean a 40 GigaByte drive? Surely not, since that would have been written "40GB".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  122. iPod? BAH by pudge · · Score: 2

    This is more like what I wanted Apple to produce. All HP needs now is 802.11 for it!

  123. when the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    did we become consumers, customers and users anyway? when did we stop being people?

  124. Instant on? by jeti · · Score: 1

    Can anyone tell me how long it takes
    to turn that box on? Any boot time?

  125. sig question by bgarcia · · Score: 1
    We had to destroy America in order to save it - Bush
    I've never seen this quote attributed to Bush before! That's a pretty damning quote.

    Can you point me to a source for this?

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    1. Re:sig question by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      It's not a quote. It's an analogy.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  126. It all boils down.. by Malachi · · Score: 1
    To the average consumer.. I live in NC, and have a GF in SC, in both these states do you know how much rural population is a makeup for the demographic? Sure.. I can whip up a spare box in my home for an entertainment computer as well as run the cat5 around the house, or use the wireless, but the majority cannot.

    We are geeksincarnate.. We build things, tinker with things, and bitch about everything. If we can hack it and make it better, wonderful, but remember the world was built for the generalist, and we are a minority in a largely unintelligent, untechnical world.


    -M-

    --
    "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
  127. Is "anal retentive" hyphenated? by Johnny_Longtorso · · Score: 1

    ..just wondering

    --
    Even casual involvement excludes total freedom by it's inherent nature. John Valby
  128. Worth it if it had analog in.... by Johnny_Longtorso · · Score: 1
    What I'd really like is a unit like this that has analog inputs, so old geezers like me can get our vinyl into other formats. Yeah, I know I can do it with a PeeCee (in fact, my sound card even has digital optical in and out) but I like the idea of a dedicated appliance rather than something that boots, etc.


    And I agree with many of the comments re:price. This thing should be sub-$500. In it's current form it's doomed, unless HP simply wants to sell a few dozen units to UberGeeks that simply have to have every new toy out there. Smells like Kerbango! all over again.....

    --
    Even casual involvement excludes total freedom by it's inherent nature. John Valby