Slashdot Mirror


Evolution 1.0 Released

jdavidb writes: "I pulled up the Ximian redcarpet updater this morning and discovered that Evolution 1.0 is finally available! Now Outlook can start facing some serious competition, although there's still a long way to go. (Evolution does not yet emulate all the Outlook viruses, of course, nor does it integrate with Exchange Server.)" Here's Ximian's full announcement. Update: 12/03 14:59 GMT by T : Nat Friedman of Ximian points out that they're offering a software extension which does allow integration with Exchange 2000. There's good story on the new iteration of Evolution at NewsForge, too.

425 comments

  1. Creation 1.1 hot on its heels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    By Microsoft, natch.

    1. Re:Creation 1.1 hot on its heels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Kreation, the followup to Magellan/Aethera

    2. Re:Creation 1.1 hot on its heels. by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But God Software Inc(tm) is currently suing for trademark infringment...

    3. Re:Creation 1.1 hot on its heels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's pretty good - Msft *IS* a lot like biblical creation, Bill speakths, waves his magic wand and *poof*, there it is, out of nowhere, complete with lots of defects just like creation has wars, plagues, deaths, suffering, but can we blame the creator for any of it? Nooooo! It's always the sinful users fault/problem, even if they have absolutely NO idea of what they did wrong. People using Windows have been trained to beleive that, whenever it does something screwey, they get that vague guilty feeling that it was something they did wrong.

  2. Slack Support by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 1

    I run slackware, but Ximian Gnome looks really great. I looked into it and it seemed that I would have some big problems getting it to work with Slack (7.X, updated kernel and such).

    Anyone out there get it to work with a distro of Slack?

    --

    Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    1. Re:Slack Support by zoomba · · Score: 1
      I got EVERYTHING but gtkhtml to compile and install... To do this I had to symlink things all over the place. Slack puts gnome in a really really dumb place (/opt/gnome) that none of the programs are by default told to look in for libraries and all that stuff.

      If you want Ximian Gnome to work properly on your slackware install, be prepared to totally rework your gnome install and a lot of programs and links associated with it.

      In the end I don't think it's worth it just for a desktop environment (I use and love Enlightenment) or an email client.

      -Z

    2. Re:Slack Support by schrotie · · Score: 1

      Hi, dunno about about ximian on slackware (I tested ximian but I'm happier with debian gnome). But http://www.gnome.org posted something in their news (http://news.gnome.org/gnome-news/gnome-news/10071 65758/) that might interest you. There is some effort (http://linuxsalute.com/) to do for slackware what ximian did for other dists. Regards Thorsten

    3. Re:Slack Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I got it running on my Slackware 8.0 system.

      First time I did it with the 0.99 packages from Linuxmafia (http://www.linuxmafia.org/) and the second time I did it with 1.0RC2 but build it from source. Building it from source is quite a challenge, there are a _LOT_ of dependencies on various gnome packages, but it is possible.

    4. Re:Slack Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Slack puts gnome in a really really dumb place (/opt/gnome) that none of the programs are by default told to look in for libraries and all that stuff."

      Easily fixed (on Slack 8):

      1) put /opt/gnome into /etc/ld.so.conf and rerun ldconfig

      2) when compiling gnome stuff use './configure --prefix=/opt/gnome'
      and re-run ldconfig as root after installing a library.

      Then there's no need to symlink stuff 'all-over-the-place'.

    5. Re:Slack Support by platypus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AFAIK, your "dumb" place the place where gnome should go, according to the LSB.

    6. Re:Slack Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the LSB said to jump off a cliff then you wouldn't think that was dumb either?

  3. No Outlook Viruses by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    No Outlook Viruses. I have to think that's a good thing, though most end-users may eventually want them supported too just so they feel more at home as they migrate off Outlook.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:No Outlook Viruses by dattaway · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I do miss the excitement my more adventurous friends have with their computers. Hopefully, one of these days, viruses will be supported. Unfortunately, I have to do without. Imagine watching the html logs with all those juicy .EXE entries and not getting a full taste of the action in spreading ILOVEYOU to those around the world. It will be a while before open source becomes the innovation leader in desktop technologies.

    2. Re:No Outlook Viruses by jacks0n · · Score: 1

      maybe you could try running the virii/trojans in wine? I can see it now:

      wine --dll fuckme,fuckmehard32=n --winver win98 TROJAN.exe

  4. Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by havardw · · Score: 5, Informative

    See press release at Ximian's site. Available early next at $69 a pop.

    1. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG!
      ITS NOT FREE!
      WTF? Why are you posting this? Its not fucking free! Are you stupid or something, its not free..
      Let me say it again, its not free!

    2. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by Otter · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah, NewsForge's take on the story seems a little more relevant that Slashdot's -- that Ximian is giving up its talk of "services" and is planning to make money from proprietary software seems at least as noteworthy as the fact that Evolution is now 0.01 versions better than it was before. (Generally I don't understand the obsession with 1.0 announcements for software that has had 20 releases and publically available nightlies or CVS since its inception.)

      Hey, I'd much rather see Ximian alive than dead and if Evolution works reasonably well on Solaris (haven't gotten around to trying it) I'm sure my wife will be in line to pay $69 to be rid of that godawful web interface to Exchange. But it seems like it might be worth mentioning that Free/Open Source software poster boy Miguel de Icaza is now in the proprietary software business. I can't help noticing that he's making himself scarce and letting Nat answer the phone...

    3. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by Nick · · Score: 1

      $69 is well worth this price. There needs to be more software like this out there available and at affordable prices.

      --
      Fuck Ajit Pai
    4. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Mozilla guys had a good explanation of why 1.0 is special, at least for them. 1.0 means API freeze -- in the sense that the 1.0 API will be available at least until 2.0 (though it could be extended). This is not so important for users, but for developers outside the Mozilla project, it is critical.

      Since Evolution has a plugin facility, maybe the 1.0 obsession exists for similar reasons. Now developers can target it with peace of mind.

      -Paul Komarek

    5. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooh, miguel didn't take the time to email slashdot personally. big deal. have you ever met miguel or nat? they're both excellent hackers, but miguel is really the big-idea, talk-fast, take-no-prisoners, write-more-code-now kind of guy, while nat, on the other hand, is really a natural at handling the PR side of being a gifted hacker at a cool company.

    6. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by gl1ched · · Score: 1

      Ya' it is $69 dollars but it only looks like they are making a $2.00 profit.... In order to be M$ compliant you need a Exchange CAL to use it which is $67 so it looks like they are selling their connector for $2 and including the CAL.

    7. Re:Proprietary Exchange-support to follow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      have you ever met miguel or nat? they're both excellent hackers

      has nat ever actually released anything? still waiting for gnu rope...

  5. Exchange... by John+Fulmer · · Score: 5, Informative

    >Now Outlook can start facing some serious >competition, although there's still a long way to >go. (Evolution does not yet emulate all the >Outlook viruses, of course, nor does it integrate >with Exchange Server.)

    A better way of putting this is "does not COMPLETELY integrate with Exchange Server". I'm running it with my company's Exchange servers, via IMAP, LDAP, and SMTP, and the only thing not working is Calendar and shared TODO.

    1. Re:Exchange... by shaka · · Score: 1

      I use Evolution and have been using it fo and fro for some time now (it stopped working for a while in Debian sid), and I really like it.
      But please tell me, how did you get the LDAP connection up'n'running?

      --
      :wq!
    2. Re:Exchange... by opk · · Score: 1
      > I'm running it with my company's Exchange servers, via IMAP, LDAP, and SMTP

      Unfortunately, support for POP/IMAP etc can be disabled on the exchange server which some companies do. Fortunately, they don't where I currently work so I can get my mail off with fetchmail.

      I'd like to see fetchmail able to use the MS protocol to get my mail off servers where POP is disabled.

    3. Re:Exchange... by buzzini · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the calendar functionality is pretty critical for a lot of companies.

    4. Re:Exchange... by panther_d · · Score: 1

      Please tell me (dk.mailbox@gmx.net)how you got it to work with exchange server... does not budge here. Thanks very much Daniel

      --
      intoxicated, adj.: When you feel sophisticated without being able to pronounce it.
  6. installation by nocent · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you already use Ximian GNOME, you can install version 1.0 by subscribing to the Ximian GNOME channel in Red Carpet (System -> Get Software).

    Otherwise, download the binaries or source code.

    1. Re:installation by nege · · Score: 1

      I actually did this. The red carpet software looks great on the surface. Then you use it. It seemed and looked beautiful. It even made a pretty sound when it was done downloading compiling and installing evo. Then I tried to run evo and it just kind of crashed. I love the idea of this software, but my actual ability to install and configure software on linux has been shady to say the least. (Which is fine if you are a linux HaX0r, but isnt the whole point of making software like redcarpet so that you dont have to be?)

  7. Were is IBM? by swordboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd figure that Lotus Notes would be a *no brainer* for Linux considering their backing of the platform. Does anyone know what is holding them back? Are they just trying to shoot themselves in the foot or what?

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Were is IBM? by Surak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah... Lotus Notes is so tied in to the Win32 platform it's not funny. I mean, the stupid thing integrates with Microsith Planet Exploder.

    2. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am working at IBM and there are several packages for Lotus Notes (5.04 -> 5.08, even beta 6.0) working on Linux. Rpm and Deb included.. works great. It does use a customized install of wine, but it is very fast and I havent had any problems over the past 6 months using it exclusively

    3. Re:Were is IBM? by Gollo · · Score: 1

      Is this available outside of IBM? I'm really interested in running Notes on Linux, any pointers to where I can get these packages?

      Gollo.

    4. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHHHHH!

      For goodness sake be quiet. Someone from IBM might hear you and actually port it. I HATE Lotus notes. I use linux at work, and I can't use Lotus notes and that suits me just fine thanks.

      Christ, I don't ever like linux really, but I spend all day advocating its use with the secret motive of stopping the spread of the evil Bloatus Notes.

      DONT MAKE ME HAVE TO USE IT AGAIN!!! I WILL NOT SURVIVE.

      Please, if everyone spend just a few minutes of their time each day ensuring Lotus Notes usage is minisised then I am sure that in time we can rid the world of this evil.

      Join me my friends and together we can make the world a brighter, better place once more. A simpler world, a nicer world, the world without Lotus fucking Notes.

      Thanks and goodnight
      ..

    5. Re:Were is IBM? by MartinG · · Score: 1

      links to downloads please?

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    6. Re:Were is IBM? by the_argent · · Score: 1

      Funny....
      Last year at LWE in NYC I spoke with a few of the IBM people at the show and the official word is that there will never be a Linux port of Notes.
      Plus, seeing how the company I work for is an IBM / Lotus buisness partner, I have yet to see any such animal.

      Care to come out from under your anonymity and prove me wrong?

      argent

    7. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is internal testing only right now.. the notes client is bundled together with the wine customization and the whole package.. there is no link for downloads because then they would be giving away free copies of the notes client. I'm sure in the future there will be some package released to run your existing r5/r6 w32 package under linux

    8. Re:Were is IBM? by pohl · · Score: 1

      From the sound of it, there is still no port of Notes to Linux. The poster mentioned running the Windows executable under Wine, which means that running Notes on Debian/PPC, for example, is right out.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    9. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if you can access the ibm intranet,. which many many people can due to the amount of companies they have recently bought up, do a search for linux notes on w3

    10. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the confusion is with Notes the server & Notes the client. IIRC, there is a Notes server for Linux, but not a Notes client.

      Would the IBM guy please verify this?

    11. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, edit your location document or preferences and you will see that it does not need IE at all

    12. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct. domino (notes server) is available native on linux. the notes client is available on w32 & mac. the internal client that works on linux is just the w32 client bundled with a heavily custmized wine install. and once again, this is not available to the public (yet?!)

    13. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone who has access to the ibm intranet, follow this link:
      http://w3.opensource.ibm.com/projects/nul

      notes client under linux. it works great.

      and domino under linux, here is a slashdot story from 1999
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/11/07/1272 19 &mode=thread

    14. Re:Were is IBM? by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      Please, use or administer Lotus Notes and you won't call him an ass anymore. It has to be the worst setup for mail I have ever experienced.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    15. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do daily, if you know how to use it correctly it is a great product. Your comment is just like saying that windows is better then unix because it is friendlier to setup or easier to learn to admin...

    16. Re:Were is IBM? by Gollo · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those with no access to the IBM intranet, there are a couple of other links that might help.

      here and here

    17. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      go on - leak a copy. we wont tell anyone.

    18. Re:Were is IBM? by greenfly · · Score: 2

      FWIW, I've been able to get Notes working under wine since... Redhat 5.2 or so. Lexmark (of course) is a big Notes user, and so it became necessary for my Linux box to run it so I could check my mail.

    19. Re:Were is IBM? by spanielrage · · Score: 1

      Not having a Lotus Notes CLIENT (they do have the Domino server available) for Linux is fairly consistent with IBM's attitude towards user apps on Linux. Same can be said for Lotus SmartSuite.

    20. Re:Were is IBM? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Internal IBM Guy here. Post a w3 link so I can get it to my team. We have about 200 or so xSeries ATS guys trying to migrate laptops over to Linux but Notes (And the MTS Client) are the big hold up.

      Little Help?

      tboucher at us dot ibm dot com if you want to email internally.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    21. Re:Were is IBM? by Eloquence · · Score: 1
      Hi,

      could you explain why running Notes with WINE is impossible with Debian/PPC? Couldn't a finished Notes install be copied to any machine, or isn't WINE available for Debian/PPC for some reason?

      Thanks.

    22. Re:Were is IBM? by Hedon · · Score: 1

      I daily have to use the Notes Client, and hate every minute of it. Especially the internal inconsistencies, and counter-intuitive interface are killers.
      The Notes Client is a bad database client, with a lousy GUI, and certainly not fit as a mail client.

    23. Re:Were is IBM? by richie123 · · Score: 1

      Wine is an runtime layer for win32 applications, it won't work on non-x86 platforms be cause they don't process x86 software. It would be possible to get it working if wine had some type of x86 cpu emulator, but there isn't one.

    24. Re:Were is IBM? by Eloquence · · Score: 1

      Ah, I understand now that the problem is binary loading -- this would require a virtual machine to be portable. I notice that the WINE libraries, which allow recompiling software for Linux, have been ported to the PPC architecture though, so IBM could port Notes to DebianPPC using WINELIB. Ah, that's the problem if you don't have the source ..

    25. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there are a few open source x86 emulators. Bochs et al.

    26. Re:Were is IBM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so ignorant it's not funny. Notes runs under OS/2.

    27. Re:Were is IBM? by szo · · Score: 1

      What about non-x86 platforms?

      Szo

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
  8. Dead Already by cd-w · · Score: 1

    Good grief - the story has only been on Slashdot 5 minutes, and http://red-carpet.ximian.com is
    not accepting connections!

    1. Re:Dead Already by Brackney · · Score: 1

      ...and Red Carpet isn't letting me connect to a mirror this morning either... :p

    2. Re:Dead Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems it still tries to connect to http://red-carpet.ximian.com even if you specify another mirror. I removed everything in /var/cache/redcarpet and it seems to work fine now.

    3. Re:Dead Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happens when you can't pay your ISP bills. VA Suckers is next.

  9. nice, also good for Palm synching by ciryon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Evolution is actually a very nice app and I use it at home, mainly because of the nice conduits avaliable for Palm synching.

    I hope it's finaly a stable program now, cause it had lot's of nasty bugs.

    Ciryon

    1. Re:nice, also good for Palm synching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as a side-question: I must admit, I am still stuck with Outlook and the Windows hotsync for my visor, mainly because I do a lot of syncing within my LAN. I like to slap my visor into another cradle at a computer I am at and have it sync with my main desktop (yes, I admit, I live at the Playboy Mansion and it is a pain to walk through all those rooms to sync my Visor). Any chance this will ever spill over into Linux?

  10. Exchange compatability by bonius_rex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Full compatability with MS Exchange Is coming

    1. Re:Exchange compatability by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and full compatibility with Word "is coming" to Star Office.

      "Is coming" is meaningless unless it's a synonym for "in beta".

    2. Re:Exchange compatability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is coming" is meaningless unless it's a synonym for "in beta".

      Just like Syberghost is meaningless unless it's a synonym for "fucktard."

  11. It's an opinion not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evolution does not yet emulate all the Outlook viruses, of course, nor does it integrate with Exchange Server

    This is called an opinion, an obscure one, but an opinion after all.

    Slashdot can't write a think about Microsoft without say "Microsoft Sux".

    I think that is boring read all the same again and again.

    Ximian roolz, but don't blame Microsoft when the news don't are about Microsoft.

    1. Re:It's an opinion not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually I thought it was quite informative that it doesn't yet integrate with Exchange Server

    2. Re:It's an opinion not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that is boring read all the same again and again.

      Have you tried not reading it? That's how most people respond when they find that reading something is boring them, they stop. Try it.

    3. Re:It's an opinion not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try telling that to all the abortion idiots. Instead of bombings and anthrax scares, they could just ignore it. Oh wait...no they can't....it is their god-given duty to interfere with people's lives!

  12. Shame about Exchange by DavidpFitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like Evolution... really, I do. Except, I can't use it. We use Exchange at work, and there's nothing I can do to make Evolution work.

    I think Ev v1 was roadmapped to integrate with Exchange -- since it doesn't it's not a viable option for corporates who primarily use Windows, but have people using Unix.

    But, Exchange is not the be-all and end-all, tight integration with Lotus Domino would be excellent. Lots of big corporations use Notes heavily, and require a Windows client (Domino web services aren't great)

    Perhaps an open standard for groupware (discussion, IM, calendar, to-do etc.) could be adopted, and through that Exchange/Notes -> new standard could be employed, aloowing other people to bring integration with whatever groupware server they want to Evolution and other clients?

    Could be a very bad idea, but it's just off the top of my head!

    Dave

    1. Re:Shame about Exchange by RossyB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Evolution will talk to Exchange if the server admin has turned on IMAP4 or POP3. Ximian announced Connector which is a plugin to talk directly to an Exchange 2000 server.

    2. Re:Shame about Exchange by DavidpFitz · · Score: 2

      Sure, but lets face it -- if you were controlling a network with Outlook clients, you'd just use regular exchange... it's easier to manage than giving POP/IMAP as well, one less thing to worry about.

      And, the whole point of Exchange is that I can schedule meetings with someone else, and maintain a server side to-do list etc.

      If I were a sysadmin, I'd just tell the minority (i.e. Unix people at my place) to use the Exchange web client.

      But it would be nicer just to be able to use Evolution :-)

    3. Re:Shame about Exchange by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      You'll need to turn on IMAP or POP4 access on your Exchange Server. Since Exchange Server really isn't doing anything, this client should be on par pretty quickly. What does that mean? Well, Outlook is really doing 99% all of the work that people seem to attribute to Exchange Server. That being the case, once an open client supports 99% of everything that Outlook does, it greatly obsoletes the need for an Exchange Server for, I'd guess, 80% of Microsoft's installations. Furthermore, in places where they want a Unix solution but are forced to go with Microsoft because the CEO has to have a shared calendar, Any server can now fill the roll. The CEO can use Outlook and the techies can use Ev. That's not to say that 80% of the Exchange Server installations will dump it, rather, there simply won't be a requirement for it to achieve the same results.

    4. Re:Shame about Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There should be a moderation option for retarded.
      If people could go and modify their mail server they wouldnt even have Exchange on it would they einstein.
      DUH!

    5. Re:Shame about Exchange by Amphipod · · Score: 1

      Well, Evolution is not working for me since RC 1. There are some weird problems with oaf and wombat that prevent Evolution from starting. All I get is the dreaded "Cannot start Evolution shell. Configuration database not found" error message. I posted a bug report on bugzilla, we had some message exchange but the problems still persist. At least for me and a bunch of other users, Evolution is dead in the water.

    6. Re:Shame about Exchange by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Except the Connector is proprietary.

    7. Re:Shame about Exchange by Quikah · · Score: 2

      So is Exchange, what is your point?

      --
      Q.
    8. Re:Shame about Exchange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well, Outlook is really doing 99% all of the work that people seem to attribute to Exchange Server"

      You're thinking MSMail (or CC:mail, or...) my friend. Exchange is actually a freakin amazing product under the hood that unfortunately gets a bad reputation due to outlook nastiness.

      If you have a need for mail and calendar access from an exchange box, why wouldn't you just ask for access to the web interface?

    9. Re:Shame about Exchange by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      I thought the whole point was an open-source replacement for Exchange?

      Isn't this the same Miguel de Icaza who started GNOME because KDE was dependent on the (at the time) proprietary Qt libraries? If we shouldn't use KDE because it's proprietary, why should we use his proprietary software? Because the money goes to him instead of TrollTech?

    10. Re:Shame about Exchange by RossyB · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point of Evolution is to provide a complete open-source replacement for Exchange. At the moment the remote calendar/tasks etc are missing, but that can be fixed. The proprietary connector is *only used* if you are stuck with the proprietary Exchange server.

    11. Re:Shame about Exchange by botemout · · Score: 1

      My point, increasingly, is in creating and growing linux software companies that actually make money
      and provide good livings for their employees. If Ximian doesn't SELL something soon they're going to be gone. If you hate the obscene power of MS the only answer is to contribute to a ecosystem that can compete with MS, i.e., one that makes money!

      Why do so many ./|GNU folks not see this?

    12. Re:Shame about Exchange by spongman · · Score: 2

      Well, I enabled the Microsoft's IMAP4 connector on our Exchange 2000 server - it took about 60 seconds - and I was able to open my inbox from Mozilla's Mail/News window without problems. It did take a while to download the headers but it seems to work seamlessly. I don't really see the need for Ximian's Exchange connector, unless it provides native Exchange protocol support and the benifits that provides. I haven't tried Evolution, but Outlook's Exchange integration is much tighter than most people would think. Some of the features that IMAP doesn't cover are calendar/meeting, address-book, public folders, server-side inbox rules, poll-less message receipt, dynamic header download (as you scroll), etc... but it works fine for sending/receiving messages.

    13. Re:Shame about Exchange by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      # killall -9 oafd wombat
      # evolution&

      try that. You proably just have a stale oafd or wombat process.

      Alternativly
      # rm -fr /tmp
      your directory and do the above.

      If it still doesn't work, blow away your evolution directory. (save the mbox files, and the address databases, etc) and do all the above

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    14. Re:Shame about Exchange by NonSequor · · Score: 2
      I've had that problem before. I can't remember exactly what I did to fix it. I do know that it isn't the end of the world though. Try running oaf-slay and then running Evolution. If that doesn't work, back up your Evolution directory and try to copy the files containing your mail, tasks, calendar, etc. to some place else. Then delete the Evolution directory and start Evolution. Once it has regenerated the Evolution directory, close Evolution and copy the files back into their original places.

      I think one of those two things will do it.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    15. Re:Shame about Exchange by flacco · · Score: 2
      Furthermore, in places where they want a Unix solution but are forced to go with Microsoft because the CEO has to have a shared calendar, Any server can now fill the roll. The CEO can use Outlook and the techies can use Ev.

      Please, enlighten me - what servers other that Exchange work with Outlook shared calendaring?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    16. Re:Shame about Exchange by Lunastorm · · Score: 1

      GNU folks have a problem dealing with reality. They're too busy trying to force the GPL on everything because after all, in the name of "Freedom" just like the terrorists killed many people in the name of Allah.

      --
      You die too easily.
    17. Re:Shame about Exchange by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      I don't really see the need for Ximian's Exchange connector

      In case you didnt notice, you just answered your own question. Yes the connector provides all the features that IMAP doesnt!

      IMAP doesn't cover are calendar/meeting, address-book, public folders, server-side inbox rules, poll-less message receipt, dynamic header download (as you scroll), etc...

    18. Re:Shame about Exchange by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Hheheh....you've been sucked into MS's web! Outlook does it...NOT Exchange Server!!!! Exchange Server simply acts as a mail repository. Imagine that!

      HEHEHE!

    19. Re:Shame about Exchange by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Well, once you learn more about what Outlook and Exchange REALLY does, you'll learn that you don't have the foggiest idea what you're talking about. Outlook does 99% of all of the collaborative magic that people think Exchange Server is doing. If you bother to check you'll find that Exchange Server acts as nothing more than a data repository and that Outlook is actually doing most of it!

      Don't believe me, join the ranks that know what they are talking about and spend a couple months learning how and what Outlook/Exchange does but reading up on sites about MAPI, Exchange Connectors, and various other tidbits which cover in detail how these things happen. In a nut shell, you are obviously not qualified to comment.

    20. Re:Shame about Exchange by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Except that the calendar information is actually stored as messages within the Exchange repository. Don't believe me, visit SlipStick (I think that's right) which has lots of tools and information to learn more about it. That being said, MS just tries to limit (in Exchange) the access paths (thusly the clients) which can retrieve this information. That is why it is all undocumented, nonetheless, again, Outlook is doing the magic...NOT Exchange.

      Basically, Exchange Server is allowing for triggered events (non-polling) and some hooks to attach scripts and code to them.

      IMAP doesn't cover are calendar/meeting, address-book, public folders, server-side inbox rules, poll-less message receipt, dynamic header download (as you scroll), etc...

      You're right. IMAP doesn't provide for that as it's a transport layer! The messages that get transported (message formats) allow for that, save the address books, which LDAP happily covers. Server side rules. Yawn. Hardly required for collaborative tools to work and really out side the scope of what we are talking about. Dynamic header download? If I recall, IMAP allows for this. You simply indicate the range of headers that you are interested in. This can all be done without Outlook.

      As usual, people seem to confuse implementation with technical boundaries. Simply put, pretty much EVERYTHING that people want for a shared/collaborative experience can be implemented using standard and open protocols and message formats.

      The Open Office is also interested in this. Still don't believe me? Go visit them and you'll find that they are exploring the same road that I did a long time ago. Outlook does pretty much all of the work that people give credit to Exchange Server. I have no idea why this is so hard to accept, but let me assure you, Outlook does all (99%) of the work, including making the messages and/or manipulating the attributes on a message to give to Exchange Server to STORE. Exchange Server does very little aside from asynchronous event notification and storing of the MESSAGES that contain information on meetings and scheduled events.

    21. Re:Shame about Exchange by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, in places where they want a Unix solution but are forced to go with Microsoft because the CEO has to have a shared calendar, Any server can now fill the roll. The CEO can use Outlook and the techies can use Ev.

      Please, enlighten me - what servers other that Exchange work with Outlook shared calendaring?


      I guess I should clarify this. Shared calendars are nothing more than messages being pushed to all people that it pertains to. That being said, as long as ANY client supports these messages, they can exist in a shared environment. Simply put, Exchange, for the most part, DOES NOT *DO* SHARED CALEDARING! Yes, it has support FOR it, but that support is pretty much limited to STORING and MANIPULATING the messages which contain the event in question. Didn't you know that you can envite people to meetings whos accounts don't exist on an Exchange Server??? Basically, Exchange Server allows for delegate permissions, asynchronous event notification and free/busy information. All of these items have free and/or open message specifications and protocols which are equivlent. Furthermore, even with Outlook, you can implement free/busy information WITHOUT THE NEED FOR AN EXCHANGE SERVER. Simply put, Outlook does 99% of all of collaborative work that people rush to give credit to Exchange Server for.

      Go figure!

      So, I guess the REAL answer to your question is, what CLIENTS support shared calendars?? The answer is, any that support iCal, vCard, and LDAP. Any client which fully support these is a canidate to replace Outlook as a collaborative client.

  13. Gnome growing up? by ukryule · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Looks like gnome development is going well now ... along with Galeon 1.0 being released a week ago, some of the critical apps are starting to get 'solid'.

    Another twist in the KDE vs. Gnome fight?

    1. Re:Gnome growing up? by JanneM · · Score: 1

      And Gnumeric is slated to go 1.0 around the end of the year. Things are looking good for my favorite apps.

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Gnome growing up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh kmail and konqueror reached 1.0 over two years ago

      this only proves how far ximian is behind

      fuck da ximian niggaZ!Q@#!#@!&^#&*^#&

    3. Re:Gnome growing up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...and AbiWord is, too, if I remember correctly. I really love to see good applications turn 1.0.

      The GNOME project thankfully hasn't fallen prey to the version-number inflation that's out of control these days. If Evolution was a KDE project, they'd have no Exchange integration at all but would be calling it version 4.3 by now. And Adobe; they increment their version number by a full point every 9 months, regardless of whether anything's actually changed or not....

    4. Re:Gnome growing up? by Thnurg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you mean another twist in the "Linux getting ready for Joe User's Desktop" saga?

      Let's ditch the in fighting eh, and concentrate on the real issue here.

      --
      The months are just too short. I can count the number of days on one hand.
    5. Re:Gnome growing up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gnome development has been going strong for a long time. It's just the people who form their opinions on software projects through comments on slashdot who thought it was dead.

      Both KDE and GNOME are moving along just fine.

    6. Re:Gnome growing up? by Lunastorm · · Score: 1

      It's like how KDE goes up a version number every other month to make it look like they're ahead of GNOME.

      --
      You die too easily.
    7. Re:Gnome growing up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and since both kmail and konqueror are both unstable half-finished lumps of fecal matter, you thereby prove the other guy's point. If evolution were a KDE app, it would be called version 8.0 by now.

      GNOME applications are lightyears ahead of their KDE equivalents in everything but version numbers. In fact, the only way the KDE team can make people think they are still in the race is to play version number games.

  14. serious competition for outlook? by mr_goodwin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not until it runs on Windows and Mac...

    Much as I love Linux, I don't think it quite has the same prevalence on the desktop.

    1. Re:serious competition for outlook? by ajs · · Score: 2

      " Not until it runs on Windows and Mac... "

      Um.. you're missing the point. The goal of creating a usable desktop under Linux (and by the extension of clean porting, other UNIX and UNIX-like systems) is to begin taking over the desktop market the same way Linux has been doing in the server market. There's no reason to run Windows if Linux can do everything that Windows can. Right now, I see the following impediments to that:

      1. Office file formats. The DoJ needs to make this call. They need to force MS to release specifications for their file formats as part of the settlement. Though, I will note that conversion by programs like AbiWord and Gnumeric are impressive.
      2. Games. Linux needs to be more game friendly, including some standards on what a distribution needs to have and how they need to configure to support them. If running EverQuest: Shadow of Luclin were as easy as putting the CD in the drive, I know about 20 people that would never need to run Windows again ;-)
      3. PR. Red Hat has been doing a good job, but IBM has only been preaching to the choir. We need good Linux PR.

    2. Re:serious competition for outlook? by mr_goodwin · · Score: 1

      I use evolution ; I don't run anything else at home, but I think people tend to choose software for an OS, not vice versa.

      Having said that, I think Linux is already a worthy OS for the dektop (esp. in a corporate environment). The big job (as you said) is in getting people to see that.

    3. Re:serious competition for outlook? by DaoudaW · · Score: 2

      So grab the source code and start compiling.

    4. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is definitly ready for the corporate environment. I can't say the same about Windows.

      Linux isn't ready for the home market, but Windows is.

      It's all about using the right tool for the job!

    5. Re:serious competition for outlook? by aenea · · Score: 1

      And as an added bonus, there's nothing here that relieves you of the obligation to buy an Exchange CAL for the machine this runs on if you're in an Exchange environment. And guess what you get with the Exchange CAL? That's right, an Outlook license.

      While it might be a good alternative in a stand-alone environment, the pricing would make it a hard-sell in a corporate windows environment.

    6. Re:serious competition for outlook? by tau_ · · Score: 1

      Usually I wouldn't care if an open-source program can be considered an "MS-replacement" or whether it runs on Windows or not, but this time is different, for exactly one reason:

      Evolution offers everything Outlook and Eudora does, so switching to it would not be a problem to anyone so inclined. And, it supports encrypted email (PGP/MIME) better than all other email software, so if my friends on Win/Mac could use it too, I wouldn't need to send them plaintext mail.

      Ie, this program is not just "as-functional-but-free", but MORE functional than software available on other platforms.

      Now, if only it read Outlook calendaring messages without major pain at the Outlook end...

      --
      Ask a silly person, get a silly answer.
    7. Re:serious competition for outlook? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

      1. Office file formats. The DoJ needs to make this call. They need to force MS to release specifications for their file formats as part of the settlement. Though, I will note that conversion by programs like AbiWord and Gnumeric are impressive.

      And add {Star,Open}Office as well. I just completed a small contract that required work with an excel spreadsheet. Nothing major, but not a minor problem either. The latest build of OpenOffice worked like a charm (I did some up front testing to make sure everything was kosher, both inporting from and saving to the latest MS Excel spreadsheet) for what I needed (there's still a major bug in vlookup, but thankfully I didn't need that functionality).

      It's not quite to the point where I don't triple check stuff to make sure its compatible (and it's still in beta so hopefully it will be rock solid at release), but Open Office has saved me from having to buy MS Office (and crap all over the small profit I've made off of a couple of small projects)

    8. Re:serious competition for outlook? by juju2112 · · Score: 2

      3. PR. Red Hat has been doing a good job, but IBM has only been preaching to the choir. We need good Linux PR.

      My girlfriend says that she saw a Linux commerical from IBM just yesterday on tv.

      It was something about the manager running around an empty server room crying, 'They're gone! They're all gone!' (referring to their servers). Then he gets the police down there and whines. Then a tech walks around the corner eating a donut and explains that they only have one server now instead of 100. They bought it from IBM and since it runs Linux it's x times faster/more efficient.

    9. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      And, it supports encrypted email (PGP/MIME) better than all other email software,

      I've been using KMail for exactly this reason (ie. it integrates with GPG like a mail agent should). Outlook (which I had to use at my previous job) also had a free (gratis) PGP plugin, which did its job decently from what I could tell. So, what are features that set Evolution apart, ie. what is especially good in its PGP (or MIME for that matter) handling? Of course if there are other goodies (esp. compared to KMail), would be nice to hear about those too?

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    10. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      There's also some basic philosophical differences. Windows is ease-of-use-first, while Linux (and all UNIX systems) tend to be power-first. This is manifested in a variety of ways - even the best graphical UNIX development tools, for example, tend to be far more command-line-driven than their Windows brethren; I don't think you could claim that ddd (debugger) is nearly as full-featured or intuitive as the one in MSVC++, for example. Or powerful text editors? In Windows, you have UltraEdit32, among many others, while in UNIX you need to use either vi or emacs to reach the same editing power, both of which are far harder to use than UltraEdit32 is (albeit even more powerful).

      Granted, Linux is getting better - you can now do simple things like configure X graphically with XF86Setup, rivalling Windows's auto-configure desktop options (though it's still not perfect). But there's still some ways to go.

    11. Re:serious competition for outlook? by cxreg · · Score: 1

      So, what are features that set Evolution apart

      Well, I don't have a full set of unique features that exist in Evo, but the coolest thing I've found so far is the VFolder system. Its basically a dynamic INBOX filter that allows you to seperate your mail into folders while leaving them in the same physical mailbox. Very useful if you want to categorize an email more than once but dont want stale copies around when you delete it, etc

    12. Re:serious competition for outlook? by ajs · · Score: 2
      Or powerful text editors? In Windows, you have UltraEdit32, among many others, while in UNIX you need to use either vi or emacs to reach the same editing power, both of which are far harder to use than UltraEdit32 is (albeit even more powerful).

      I tried to find UltraEdit32 on my Windows box... it seems to be missing, so I can't comment. On my virgin Linux box (Red Hat 7.2), I have :
      • vi (vim by default and nvi if you opt for it)
      • emacs (GNU emacs by default and Xemacs if you opt for it)
      • gedit
      • ed (the standard editor ;-)
      • xedit
      Those are the ones I know about.

      Emacs is hard to use if you're used to using Windows editors (which, suprise!, are hard to use if you're used to using Emacs).

      Vim (and vi in general) can be a bit of a pain to learn for anyone (it's the modal editing thing), but there's a lot of flexibility in its paradigm once you come to understand it (I've yet to see an easy way to do the same as "ct;return" in another editor without a lot more convolution.

      If you want simplicity, you're looking for Gedit (and I presume KDE has a "kedit"). This is your quick-and-dirty notepad-alike.

      Now, I'm sure there are others (for example, joe, jove, pico, and all of the free editors on freshmeat (67 a last count)), but you first have to define what it is you're trying to do.

      For example, when many people speak of text editing, they really mean code editing. There are a number of good IDEs out there (assuming Emacs is too difficult for you, which is saying a lot for starters). Check out the list on freshmeat, including Komodo, which is a very slick IDE built on top of the Mozilla platform.

      In the realm of editors, about the only thing you can accuse UNIX and Linux of these days is requiring you to do a fair amount of research, since there are so many options. Personally, I see this as a Good Thing(tm).

      So, you were saying?
    13. Re:serious competition for outlook? by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > and since it runs Linux it's x times faster/more efficient

      No, they say "they'll save you a bundle", and that's it. Not a thing about faster or more efficient (though the second is implied). It implies they're replacing the racks full of unix servers, probably solaris, with the big eServer running Linux. Probably not migrating windows servers. The savings implied are in administration costs, having only one box to admin instead of hundreds (giving the sysadmin the leisure to stroll casually out of the room eating a donut).

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    14. Re:serious competition for outlook? by spongman · · Score: 2

      (this is kinda OT, but) vim has a great 'insert-by-default' mode which makes it work much like a 'regular' editor - the cursor keys move around, and you can just type/delete as normal. i use gvim on win32 and linux and i have to say that it's one of the most powerful programs that I use. the win32 version also has great windows-clipboard and mouse support. I don't use emacs, so I know I'm missing out there...

    15. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can now do simple things like configure X graphically with XF86Setup, rivalling Windows's auto-configure desktop options

      And in other news, the elephant man rivals Pierce Brosnan as sexiest man alive.

    16. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

      From an article at the beginning:
      ...Ximian Connector will sell for $69 a seat. Its value proposition is that it can replace an entire Windows machine. In many large corporations, there might be 50,000 Windows users and 5,000 Linux/Unix users. But corporate standards might dictate the use of Microsoft Exchange for mail and calendaring...

      So my question is this. If it's worth $69 USD per seat for this...why doesn't Microsoft port something to Linux? If it is worth that much to companies...why not?

      My answer is this: Microsoft wants a monopoly. Its goal is domination. And therefore, it will fight Linux with all it can muster.

      In any battle for users, the company on the bottom fights to be interoperable with the company 'on top.' In this case, it is MS on top. (If you look into it, Microsoft only wants shared standards for IM clients, so they can eat up AOL's users...)

      The curious thing about KDE/Gnome, Linux, and open source in general is that there is a lot of competition, and interoperability must be neccessary for now, but what about when this stuff has a major chunk of the market?

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    17. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Partisan · · Score: 1

      In the past I've run UltraEdit32 under WINE and it worked fine for me.

    18. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Well, Evolution isn't really competition for Outlook anymore than Outlook is competition for Evolution -- they both run on different platforms with no overlap. In a somewhat ironic way, this means Exchange is now more universal and inclusive.

      So this is kind of a win for Linux the desktop and a loss for Linux the server.

    19. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star/Open Office has the best damn MS import & export filters I've seen, better than any commercial product I've run into (including Corel) and far superior to AbiWord and Gnumeric, which are themselves better than KOffice. I'm not sure why the AbiWord and KOffice people can't make use of the work done on Star/Open Office, but I sure wish they would.

    20. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Kidbro · · Score: 2

      Euhm... the standard answer to the question Why don't you run Linux? is usually It doesn't have a decent clone of applications X [where X not seldom is Microsoft Outlook].

      Now the answer to the question Why don't you run application X'? seems to be It doesn't run on Windows

      From the bottom of my heart.... HUH?

    21. Re:serious competition for outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My answer is this: Microsoft wants a monopoly. Its goal is domination. And therefore, it will fight Linux with all it can muster.

      In any battle for users, the company on the bottom fights to be interoperable with the company 'on top.' In this case, it is MS on top. (If you look into it, Microsoft only wants shared standards for IM clients, so they can eat up AOL's users...)


      duh! You are learning young jedi.

    22. Re:serious competition for outlook? by diamondc · · Score: 1

      imap using kde blows. there is no 'only list subscribed folders' option like there is in Evolution. using debian uw-imapd it lists ALL my folders in $HOME !!

      --
      "I keep looking in the want-ads under 'revolutionary' but there don't seem to be any listings.. "
    23. Re:serious competition for outlook? by ajs · · Score: 2

      In other news, the "This Is Not an Argument" sketch from Monty Python's Flying Circus appears on slashdot.

      If you wish to refute a point, please do so without resorting to hypothetical hyperbole.

  15. Ximian Connector by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Troll

    This sounds like the true Exchange solution many of us are looking for - It is proprietary and closed though.

    Before the flamage on Ximian begins, let me just say, that the businesses that this product is for have already invested in closed source software, so I think its a great idea to finance Evolution this way.

    Great job guys, keep it up!

    1. Re:Ximian Connector by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but as long as no one is under any impressions that Ximian actually have anything to do with opensource.

      Ah... Maybe I'm venting, I've been watching evolution for soooooo long now and all the reports have seemed to imply that they where not interested in exchange because of closed protocol.

      Seems to me of course is that they where stopping anyone from "scratching that itch" Opensource style.

      Pffft. They can stick it where the sun don't shine. I'm gonna crack out that python and roll my own.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:Ximian Connector by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      (Before flaming, please note that I seriously don't know the answer to this question)

      Isn't Ximian done by Miguel de Icaza?

      (Below this is trolling/flamebait/whatever)

      Isn't he the guy who started Gnome because he was pissed off at the proprietary nature of KDE/QT? How do we reconcile the two? Oh, because Miguel sees proprietary as okay if Miguel gets the money?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Ximian Connector by Nodatadj · · Score: 2, Informative

      A1: Yes
      A2: No, it was started because he didn't want a proprietry toolkit being the foundation of an open source desktop. Having a proprietry extension to an open source email client is not a foundation, you don't need to use it if you don't want to, and it doesn't provide anything that the majority of people who care about open/closed source care about.

    4. Re:Ximian Connector by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I must admit, when I first read the announcement I thought bad things about Ximian, with a sort of gutteral "sell-out" feel.

      But after having thought about it, I have no problem with this at all. I think what they are doing is something like what Troll tech or Cygnus has done -- having a complete Free product, but demanding payment when it's used in a non-free way. Troll and Cygnus have this with GPL libraries and providing alternate licenses for payment.

      Ximian can't quite do this, unfortunately, since the GPL doesn't restrict any normal use, so it has to make the plugin proprietary. It's a shame that there isn't a way to do it otherwise, and it is dangerous to create precedence of proprietary plugins to GPLed products. But, I feel the basic intention is the same.

      At some point, there'll be a Free program that basically matches the functionality of Exchange, and someone (maybe Ximian) will make a Connector for that. If that is proprietary, then we'll have something to complain about.

      But until then, if Ximian can find a way to fund themselves, more power to them.

    5. Re:Ximian Connector by Lucretius · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, but as long as no one is under any impressions that Ximian actually have anything to do with opensource.


      Well, there is the fact that they wrote a good portion of evolution, which is open source. So, in that sense they have quite a bit to do with open source, as they have written something that will give their users much of the functionality of Outlook, with the benefits of open source and hopefully a lack of all the security holes. Then everyone gets mad at them for not being completely and totally open source when the offer to sell a proprietary version of their connector in order to put some food on the table.

      Personally, I think this is a great thing. The developers at Ximian have produced a product that is very usefull to very many people, and they have done it through the open source model. However, as has been shown by many open source companies deaths, pure open source does not always pay the bills. Thus they have come up with a fairly impressive way to fund their open source project. They get the corporate people and those who really want the functionality of connecting with MS exchange to pay an extra price to keep Ximian going.

      I personally think that this is to be lauded rather than condemned. I would have much preferred to have the connector open source, as I would love to ditch windows in favor of linux for the use of exchange. However, I can see the need that they have as well...

      I see two things happening because of this... the first, someone is going to start writing an open source version of the Ximian connector, which will force Ximian to either stay on top of things and keep making theirs better, or to open source theirs and find another way to get some money. The second, is that Ximian will come up with some version of incremental releases (or a license system much like Ghostscript), which would provide revenue from corporate sources and then release the source code for others to enjoy.

      Then again, I might just be dreaming....

      marc
    6. Re:Ximian Connector by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Agreed! The Connector is the best thing ive heard about Evolution, and i will be trying it out again now! The fact is thats one of the big things that has been missing from the Linux desktop, Groupware. If the software runs well, does everything it should (ala Outlook) then that's just another good tick when the next company looks at the posibility of moving to Linux on the desktop.

      Closed solution you say, costly? Huh, this is an Exchange client your talking about, thats what companies need, so someone has to provide it.

      Frankly on a side note, this may be a 'proprietry' solution, but if it really takes off my guess is it will only be a few months before we see the first open source connector.

      PS. I think a Notes / Domino connector is the next requirement. Its amazing that we dont have one yet considering the Domino server runs on linux!

    7. Re:Ximian Connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it was started because he didn't want a proprietry toolkit being the foundation of an open source desktop
      This is pure bullshit. If the creators of GNOME did not wish to have a proprietary foundation they would have created a free Qt, like we have Lesstif a Motif clone. Instead they go and reinvent the wheel while KDE had a gigantic head start. Then they attempt to justify their bullshit reasoning by claming C is a better language to do it in than C++ (no offense to the GTK+ crowd, I like GTK+ myself). All while berating KDE for choosing Qt, which was the only option available to them at the time. Not to mention other forms of harassment coming from GNOME camp (such as IRC harassment, where people from GNOME go to KDE's channel and try to pursuade people that KDE is not free and should use GNOME). Then GNOME camp shows their jealousy when talk of GIMP being ported to KDE comes about. Talk about hypocrisy..
    8. Re:Ximian Connector by miguel · · Score: 2

      You can probably read the rationale for the creation of the GNOME project somewhere on the Web. That plan and motivation is still valid today. We want to have a complete open source solution for the desktop. Not having the foundation for a major component of a complete free system be proprietary.

      KDE was gaining momentum, and the result was dangerously approaching a world in which a large portion of the population have a mixed free/proprietary environment.

      I of course would love to see the evolution plugin be free. This is something that was debated long and hard at Ximian.

      Ximian is a strong software development house, and in order to support our development activities, some of the pieces that we write are becoming proprietary.

      The alternative would be to only provide support and services, and stop being a development house. Which is something that does not get me excited in the mornings.

      Our current mix is aimed towards maximizing the free software that end users have access to, and allows us to charge users that have the resources to finance our operation.

      For instance, most home users and students do not use Exchange or plan on using Exchange. While people in corporations are using Exchange and do not mind paying for getting access to it from Linux.

      I am sorry if I did not post earlier today, but I have basically been working all this time on more Open Source/Free Software (Mono, http://www.go-mono.com) and got a lot of work done today ;-)

      Enjoy the love!
      Miguel.

    9. Re:Ximian Connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can probably read the rationale for the creation of the GNOME project somewhere on the Web. That plan and motivation is still valid today. We want to have a complete open source solution for the desktop. Not having the foundation for a major component of a complete free system be proprietary.
      The plan to kill off KDE because it is using proprietary software is still valid?
      KDE was gaining momentum, and the result was dangerously approaching a world in which a large portion of the population have a mixed free/proprietary environment.
      How do you contain all that shit you are full of? Have you never heard of Motif? Motif was much closer to making all GUI stuff proprietary. Qt was unheard of until KDE decided to use it. Plus Qt was the only available, quality GUI toolkit that could be downloaded free-of-charge to use at the time (as GTK+ was still in its infancy and part of GIMP).
      Ximian is a strong software development house, and in order to support our development activities, some of the pieces that we write are becoming proprietary.
      Ah, that makes sense. Instead of writing a free Qt replacement, like we have Lesstif, you instead embark on a mission to destroy the GPL'd KDE and then turn around and become that mixed free/proprietary environment you hated so much.
      The alternative would be to only provide support and services, and stop being a development house. Which is something that does not get me excited in the mornings.
      Yes, I guess it's not as sexy as fucking over KDE by marketing propaganda. Welcome to the real world. Who ever said free software could make money or has to be fun and games? You surely aren't making money on free software. You are making money on services and selling a proprietary connector.
      Our current mix is aimed towards maximizing the free software that end users have access to, and allows us to charge users that have the resources to finance our operation.
      Do it for the people! Share the code! Your hippie "share the source for the good of man" propaganda is making me sick. This sentence smacks of "steal from the rich give to the poor" Robin Hood. It is an insult to assume that people using free software are poor.
      I have basically been working all this time on more Open Source/Free Software (Mono, http://www.go-mono.com)
      Bill Gates envy is spreading. Quick! Fill the vaporware needs of the free software community! Don't let KDE beat you to it!
    10. Re:Ximian Connector by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply.

      I would hope that at some point in time, (say when Evo 3.0 is released) that the full source of Evo 1.0 could be released, GPL.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    11. Re:Ximian Connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ximian is a strong software development house, and in order to support our development activities, some of the pieces that we write are becoming proprietary. The alternative would be to only provide support and services, and stop being a development house. Which is something that does not get me excited in the mornings.

      Do you feel bad about starting GNOME now that you've learned selling software gets you excited? Have you sent Trolltech a sympathy card with a little "Wow, you were right!" note on it?

    12. Re:Ximian Connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cos he is the choosen by god to be the mesiah of desktops.

    13. Re:Ximian Connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And your personal cruzada ends here?


      KDE working fine, all based in GPL software, and Gnome as a mixed propietary/free environment?

  16. interesting correlation.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    (Evolution does not yet emulate all the Outlook viruses, of course, nor does it integrate with Exchange Server.)"

    Maybe you've hit on something important here....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  17. Wake up call ... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Now Outlook can start facing some serious competition, although there's still a long way to go. (Evolution does not yet emulate all the Outlook viruses, of course, nor does it integrate with Exchange Server.)

    Until it fully supports Exchange Server, it'll never be a serious competitor to Outlook.

    Sorry, but face reality. In the corporate world it either has to be 100% compatible otherwise they just won't use it. Price is generally immaterial.

    Plus any company who can afford Exchange Server will no doubt be able to afford licences for Outlook so the whole "but its free" doesn't really offset the fact that its not fully compatible.

    However, in spite of all this, lets not knock them for a fine product. Always some work to do, but its definately on the right roads ...

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Wake up call ... by JanneM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so the whole "but its free" doesn't really offset the fact that its not fully compatible.


      No, I agree. The whole "Do you want more Outlook viruses in your company intranet?" might well do it, however.

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Wake up call ... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Exchange CALs come with an Outlook license, so if you have a license to use the server, you have a license to use Outlook.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Wake up call ... by hughk · · Score: 2
      Exchange Server is expensive. Not only do you need NT Server licences (minimum 2), but you need the client licence packs because however legal your Outlook is, you still need a per client licence on the server.

      When you get to an Enterprise, this means lots of servers, again lots of money. Exchange Server is full of some very nice features, but they are very expensive.

      Note that use of a connector product isn't much help unless you can offload the data store and directory service too. Each client is another licence, no matter whether or not they are running Outlook or even a Microsoft OS.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    4. Re:Wake up call ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs this "full Exchange support"? All we need is decent pop3/imap4/ldap client with calendar (once it's finally clear what commonly supported calendar protocol is!).

      What is this "Exchange support"? Using proprietary MS protocols? Not gonna happen.

      Once again -- we need desent e-mail/news client implementing standard protocols. Mozilla looks promising, but mail/news part is too buggy.

    5. Re:Wake up call ... by Nelson · · Score: 1
      It depends. In my place of work there are a lot of us doing Linux development running Linux on our desktops. We can get our email off of exchange servers with IMAP but we're locked out of the calendar system. As a result more than half of the team have windows machines on their desktops just for that reason. You're looking at a PC, a copy of windows, a copy of outlook, in our case you get the standard install with Office and a few dozen other apps on it.


      In our case, if half of the people can get away with only Linux then when you start looking at the licenses and the fees it starts looking like maybe we can drop the site license and switch to something at about half the cost.


      It would be better if Evolution did more but what it does is probably enough to be interesting in a lot of places

    6. Re:Wake up call ... by hughk · · Score: 2

      Whoops sorry, hit submit instead of preview. I shouldn't shout, it is impolite!

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    7. Re:Wake up call ... by Kidbro · · Score: 2

      Ok, this is a cheap shot, but nobody I know, including the most experience WinX admins (Micro$oft advocates included) have been able to make Outlook be 100% compatible with the local Exchange server.

  18. Long time user by the_rev_matt · · Score: 2

    I've been using Evolution since I believe .6 (I've been on it for over a year) exclusively and have yet to have a problem with it. YMMV, but I'm very impressed.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

  19. The problem is overintegration by Simson# · · Score: 1

    The main problem about merging seperate aplications into one common is teh lack of flexibility. I like to use a calendar aplication and a mailprogram but I see lite good in melting it alltogether in a single program.

    It's not because(not only anyway) it's microsoft who wrote it outlook are full of bugs and securityholes, its because Outlook like Evolution have merged to many different tasks into a sigle aplication. This is a step away from the "unix-way" with small exchangeable intercooperable aplications, Therefor the open source movement are just asking for the same problems as we today see in outlook/exchange/ISS -systems...

    --
    In tetris there are only loosers
    1. Re:The problem is overintegration by Junta · · Score: 1

      ISS systems? So the International Space Station systems are overintegrated? :)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:The problem is overintegration by ender- · · Score: 1

      This is a step away from the "unix-way" with small exchangeable intercooperable aplications

      Unfortunately, it seems to me that while this is the case with command line utilities, devolopers completely forgot this with gui software under X.

      Now,I'm honestly not a huge fan of gnome [some of the software involved is cool]. But none of what I have tried seems to be able to simply drag and drop.
      I want to be able to drag files from Nautilus into XMMS play lists. And drag and drop an executible into the menu to make a link, etc.

      Until that happens, and until software is as easy as inserting a cd, Linux won't come close to Windows, either in a corporate environment or at home.

      With that said however, I will admit that many pieces of software are getting much more mature and stable. All we need now are easier installation and better interoperability.

      Ender - a WindowMaker user

    3. Re:The problem is overintegration by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      This is a step away from the "unix-way"

      I feel somewhat the same way. Interchangability is really what makes for a more effective, quick adapting, faster-to-build system. Unfortunately, the most popular OS on the planet (Win32) has naturally ignored this (and most other) logic.

      It might just be me, but I think this is where Windows will go in the future, thanks to Microsoft's wonderful thiev^H^H^H^H^H feature programmers. (though I'd rather see better-protected memory for XP before any kind of interchangability)

      GUI's, too, under unix, are somewhat of a pain. They're large, cumbersome, and slow. I'm probably the only person in my town who believes that a command-line is far superior to clicking on icons - and I started with a Mac.

    4. Re:The problem is overintegration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > I like to use a calendar aplication and a
      > mailprogram but I see lite good in melting it
      > alltogether in a single program.

      I don't see anything wrong with making an application do multiple things so long as the data is stored in an open format.

      Yes Evolution integrates email, calendaring, etc into a single app, but it doesn't mean you can't use something else to access the data.

      For instance i prefer KDE as my desktop, and have KDE's AlarmDaemon running while i'm logged in. It uses the same calendar as Evolution, so no matter if i have Evolution closed i will still be informed of my appointments.

    5. Re:The problem is overintegration by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      Give rox a try. I use it with WindowMaker and it is the best environment I've found for X11 so far. Some stuff I roxified are on my homepage

      Just be sure to use the '-o' option, or you'll get all your pinboard icons in your window list.

    6. Re:The problem is overintegration by Junta · · Score: 2

      Ummm... Drag and Drop *does* pretty much work that way. XMMS supports drops from at least Nautilus and GMC, and I think Konqueror as well as ROX.
      For the end user, Drag and Drop is very much a reality.
      For Developers, there are some issues, I admit.
      I for one, in my projects test my DnD against releases of Nautilus, Konqeuror, GMC, and Rox. If you can accept from Nautilus and from Konqueror, you will be able to accept from most anywhere. The problem I see from a developer standpoint is that while all the DnDs are now more similarly implemented, there are still enough differences so that implementing DnD interoperability with other apps is not as trivial as it should be. For example, the action type maybe copy from one app and move from another, even in the exact same context. Also, the formats of filenames differs. It could be prefixed with file:, file:/, file://, or nothing at all depening on the app. Could be suffixed with \r,\n, a space, an additional embedded NULL, simple NULL termination, or any combination of the afformentioned terminators. And in encoding the string, some programs pass it as it is, some do URI encoding (space becomes %20, etc) with capital letters for hex letters, some use lower case.
      The prefix is pretty easy to catch, correct, and understand, but the inconsistancy with action types, encoding, and the various weird string-termination schemes is really hard for a developer to catch or develop around, and there is no real good reason for so many different ways of ending a string. If only projects could converge on a simple standard for this small issue, it would be great.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:The problem is overintegration by Zack · · Score: 1

      I see comments like this on slashdot all the time, and I can't help but wonder why people never think about it this way: it's all about choice. Choice.

      You can use whatever you want. How do ya like that? If you don't like Evolution, then don't use it. If you don't like mutt, then don't use it. The point is that there are many, many, many options. You get to pick what's right for you. and what's right for you might not be right for someone else.

      I personally love mutt. And I'm also starting to dig evolution. So wich do I use? Well, both really. I use mutt remotely and usually use evolution locally.

      So even if you don't like the way something is designed (in this case large applications) that doesn't mean that it's "bad" for what you want the "unix way". It's better... more choice is better.

      I'm a huge fan of freedmon to choose, thats why I'm so addicted to freshmeat... I'll check out what's coming out and if I see something I like better I give it a shot.

    8. Re:The problem is overintegration by Flower · · Score: 2
      The main problem about merging seperate aplications into one common is teh lack of flexibility. I like to use a calendar aplication and a mailprogram but I see lite good in melting it alltogether in a single program.

      Well, you're definately not an end user. They like staying in one app with one consistent interface to do multiple, related tasks in a common environment. They keep one screen up and get e-mail and meeting requests. E-mail serves as as a communication medium, a way to update status on a project and as a workflow solution to replace dead tree forms and streamline the approval process for purchases. And while I haven't seen it used for anything more useful than "where do we go for lunch?" it is also used to poll people for in-house surveys.

      The "small sharp tools" mindset is great if you are an admin or a real power user but, from my experience with end users, it is a hinderance to the rest of the PC using community. Well integrated, monolithic applications like Office, Outlook and MSIE are much easier to work with.

      This isn't saying MS does everything right but most people, including more than a few of my fellow IT staff, would cringe at a series of commands like grep | cut -f 2 | sort | uniq to get some info out of a log file. And IMHO, for the most part, "small sharp tools" doesn't translate well into a GUI environment. For most end users, stuff like Evolution is exactly what linux needs to become more widely adopted as a desktop OS.

      Therefor the open source movement are just asking for the same problems as we today see in outlook/exchange/ISS -systems...

      I disagree. Where MS failed is not looking at the 30 years worth of lessons mature OSes like *nix have learned the hard way. You don't enable tons of options/programs/etc. by default. You don't allow untrusted executables elevated permissions. Sometimes you do sacrifice adding a feature because it isn't a safe thing to do.

      From the limited amount of reading I've done in regards to Evolution, it seems they've taken those considerations into account. We'll have to see how it pans out in the real world.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    9. Re:The problem is overintegration by Lunastorm · · Score: 1

      The problem with choice is choice is not the UNIX way. The UNIX way is about a thousand small apps that do separate things rather than one large app that does everything. The UNIX way is about a command-line interface, not a GUI (Gay User Interface).

      --
      You die too easily.
    10. Re:The problem is overintegration by flacco · · Score: 2
      This is a step away from the "unix-way" with small exchangeable intercooperable aplications

      Problem is that the unix way with small applications sucks ass when you're trying to do your work in an intuitive way. Evolution offers a sensible, unified layout that's easy to work with.

      Ideally, different applications could plug into Evo to provide the same functions as the native components - in this case, Evo's "specialized" function becomes a UI "unifier" or "integrator" shell for other components, which is consistent with the Unix philosophy while offering the advantages of a monolithic app.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    11. Re:The problem is overintegration by Tet · · Score: 2
      Problem is that the unix way with small applications sucks ass when you're trying to do your work in an intuitive way.

      I'm not convinced this is true. I think there's a fair amount of people thinking the way MS has presented things is intuitive, just because they've had to put up with it for so long. Never underestimate the power of familiarity. For example, I've had Windows users complain at me because they have to double click the top left button to close a window when using my machine, and "that's not intuitive". Never mind the fact that Windows used to work that way until Win95, and that the rest of the world has worked that way since the dawn of windowing systems. No one complained that it wasn't intuitive until Win95 appeared (even NeXT users didn't have a problem with it).

      I don't think monolithic applications like Outlook (or Evolution, or Netscape or Emacs for that matter) are fundamentally better than small separate apps. There is definitely a case for having a single, consistent interface to present to the user, but that doesn't mean integrating everything into a single huge app. It would be far better to have an editor application that was called to compose a new message than having an integrated editor in Evolution. So long as that editor can be parented in any window the calling app chooses, the end user need never know it's a separate app. But it'll give them the flexibility to swap it out for something different, should they choose to do so (the biggest problem I have with virtually every GUI mail client I've tried is that I can't compose my messages in vi :-)

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    12. Re:The problem is overintegration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For example, I've had Windows users complain at me because they have to double click the top left button to close a window when using my machine, and "that's not intuitive". Never mind the fact that Windows used to work that way until Win95, and that the rest of the world has worked that way since the dawn of windowing systems.

      Let me guess, you also walked twelve miles to school every day, uphill both ways, and so you can't see any possible advantage to these new-fangled "school buses" that just make kids fat and lazy. While we're at it, I admire your use of a toggle board to post to Slashdot. No counterintuitive "key-boards" for you!

      Could it just maybe possibly be that there was a little bit more user interface experience when Windows 95 came out than Windows 3.1? No, of course not; if anything is different now, the only reason could be Microsoft brainwashing. It certainly can't be that we've had hundreds of man-years of human interface research to build better interfaces on.

  20. Cool, but... by ppetru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm using Evolution and Mutt as my primary mail clients now (I used to only use Mutt, but I forced myself into Evo so I could help with testing and bug reports). Evo is a very impressive application and I hope people who need such a tool will like it.

    However, I don't need or want such a tool. I just want a mail client that logs into my IMAP server, reads and sends mail. That's it. Integrated {contact manager,calendar,task manager,whatever} is cool, but I don't want it. I need something that does a thing, and it does it well, and I hope that other mail(-only) clients will raise to the standard set by Evolution (so far only Mulberry was good enough but it's neither free or open source, and there are a couple things I don't like about it either).

    --

    Petru
    1. Re:Cool, but... by corr · · Score: 1

      You might want to give Sylpheed a whirl. It's a clean, intelligently designed Gtk+ mail client with support for POP3, APOP, and IMAP4rev1. It also has news reader support, but I never use it and it doesn't get in the way.

      All in all, a fantastic client that does basically what Evolution does - but without all the extra features.

      --

      We wave the flag of freedom as we conquer and invade.
    2. Re:Cool, but... by pigeon · · Score: 1

      I like sylpheed, it has a lot of features I really miss in evolution, like the use of an external editor (I like vi, ht internal editors of most email programmes suck) and descent keybindings. If you want to use the cutting edge vrsion of sylpheed, there's the sylpheed-claws fork. What I do miss in sylpheed is the ability to view html mail. I hate when people send me mail with html, but I want to be able to at least read it.

    3. Re:Cool, but... by corr · · Score: 1

      Then by all means mail em!

      Send suggestions/bug reports here: hiro-y@kcn.ne.jp.

      And I think it does have support for an external editor, at least in the newer verion (I don't use that though). Sylpheed-Claws is nice, but I hasten to use it as it crashes sometimes - and when I'm composing a large mail and lose it, shoowee I get mighty pissed.

      --

      We wave the flag of freedom as we conquer and invade.
  21. Re:Not bad so far by tve · · Score: 1

    Its mail client, unlike Microsoft Outlook, is very easy to use and secure.

    Its security can only be tested by large scale deployment. Calling it secure now would be a bit premature.

    Evolution 1.0 will do for open-source what the Segway has already done for the field of personal transportation.

    Uhm, like what? Create a lot of hipe? (If that was a joke, you should have used a smiley.)

    --

    If there is hope, it lies in the trolls.
  22. Two Things... by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) It won't yet do email alerts calendar events, or so the pop up tells me. So my cell phone won't beep me when a meeting is in ten minutes and I'm still eating burritos at the mexican restaurant on the next block. Sucks.

    2) I can't expunge mail at all. It's got something to do with the UID EXPUNGE header while using IMAP and the commercial version of Sendmail running here. Pine can do it. Netscape can do it. So can Outlook. But Evolution can't. I've reported this issue, and unfortunately they didn't address it in the 1.0 release.

    Evolution looks nice. But if I can't expunge my mail without loading up pine, then I'll stick with pine.

    Bummer.

    1. Re:Two Things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Ctrl-E in the folder you want to expunge.

  23. Re:Today on "Ask slashdot": by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would make an excellent "Red Meat" strip - it reminds me of the one where the kids find the dead clown...

  24. Ximian Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would the Ximian monkey evolve to? It certainly wouldn't be a certain biped.

  25. Again, this isn't groupware by SnapperHead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Its nice, but I can't figure where they say its groupware. Currently, its a PIM. But, for some odd reason, there not intrested in intergrating it into a groupware application via XML-RPC or SOAP. If that where true, then they could start plugging into phpGroupWare. I have about 20 people a week asking me if I could ask them to do it, so I simply tell them to email there developers instead. Needless to say, nothing has come about.

    Also, we actually have a client side application for Linux and Windows that is working. (Buggy, but works) Its still under heavy development, but it pretty easy to plug into. A more portable version is in the works.

    Anyway, so people would stop asking me about it, please, email there development team and ask them to talk to the phpGroupWare guys about creating an XML-RPC or SOAP interface. I think these 2 projects would go hand and hand nicely.

    So, for those complaining about the lack of an "exchange server" enviroment, something is there, just not being used.

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
    1. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      Dude , I'd start by getting an XML-RPC or SOAP client going on your end and just hand em the Spec.

      I'd sure be interested in PHPGroupware with XML-RPC or SOAP. It's sooooo easy to create clients and automatable that way. With the Soap , even the dredded VB goons can play (But XML-RPC's much cleaner IMHO)

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

      Not trying to sound nasty or anything. But, if your so intrested in it and phpGroupWare, maybe you should read our news more then once a year :) Our XML-RPC interface is already working with 3 applications. Its kinda buggy in certain parts, some method names need to be changed. Outside of that, it DOES work and works quite well. We have a client side application avaiable for download. Mainly, its proof of concept ATM.

      Anyway, I agree. XML-RPC is much nicer and cleaner then SOAP. Thats why I started heading its development. Other developers (Mostly Milosch) are working on the SOAP portions. SOAP also gives me a headache :)

      As far as handing out a spec for the methods, parameters, and returns. This will be happening very soon. As soon as things are cleaned up and I can start writting it out. (There is an automatic parser in the works to handle it ...)

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    3. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why SOAP exactly?! Why not use XML storage structures that are still shared/kept via an IMAP server?

    4. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by Cally · · Score: 2

      there not intrested in intergrating it into a groupware application via XML-RPC or SOAP


      Thank gawd. XML-RPC and SOAP are an utter crock. Why this sudden desire to shoehorn everything into HTTP? Simple, it makes it easy to sneak non-web content in and out through firewalls without any of that tedious mucking about letting the security people know what you're doing. Uh, until firewall developers turn in the arms race, where application layer packet inspection becomes the norm and - oh hey! look at that!! You're right back to square one.


      RPC was invented to do remote procedure calls, that's what it's for,
      USE IT if you need it.

      and `phpGroupware'? What the hell is that? Oh look, it's your userpage. Riiiiight. Seeing as I haven't heard of it, it's not exactly the default corporate standard, is it. In fact it's... what's the word.. IRRELEVANT! Of course they have more important priorities than some toy "groupware" project.

      Sorry for the flames, but some people are just asking for it.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    5. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by Eloquence · · Score: 1
      Hi,

      if there's so much interest in a Evolution plugin for PHP-Groupware, why don't you people try to collect some money, via PayPal or something, and pay someone to write this plugin? I'm not sure if that's workable, it's just an idea. What do you think?

    6. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      I could careless if the storage method was a punch card system. I am simply talking about the transport bewteen client and server. Its up to the server to handle it from there. The client doesn't need to know what the other end is, as long as it gives it a method name, parameters and gets a certain response, then who cares.

      Most of phpGroupWares storage is down via SQL. Evolution is storing its data via IMAP. Doesn't matter, as long as we both use the same methods, parameters and returns. This way, its possiable for someone to use phpGroupWare for the HTML part, Evolution for the client side, using a Java or C based backened server which handles the actually auth, storage, and what not.

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    7. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      If theres a company willing to do it, be my guest. I work on phpGroupWare in my spare time (Well, 98% of my time :), as so do most of the Evolution developers. Its not really a plugin for phpGroupWare, its simply a XML-RPC or SOAP interface to Evolution.

      If Evolution where to create a modular API for there datastore, it would be very simple to create an option for where it should handle its datastore. (Or call a remote server to handle the job). From there, its also possiable to create a simple cache for those on the road with there laptops. When you get back to your office, you sync with the server.

      <soapbox>The point is, that there blocking out access to other projects. Which, IMO, isn't the best way for open source / free software to get anywhere. We develop with a different point of view. We want to work with every other project possiable. We are serious Linux guys who want to see Linux succeed. Using just an IMAP server for the datastore isn't helping matters. </soapbox>

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    8. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by Eloquence · · Score: 1
      The point is, that there blocking out access to other projects

      Could this be a motivation for a fork? What would it be called? "Revolution"? "Divine Intervention"? Or maybe "Mutiny" :)

    9. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      Thank gawd. XML-RPC and SOAP are an utter crock. Why this sudden desire to shoehorn everything into HTTP? Simple, it makes it easy to sneak non-web content in and out through firewalls without any of that tedious mucking about letting the security people know what you're doing. Uh, until firewall developers turn in the arms race, where application layer packet inspection becomes the norm and - oh hey! look at that!! You're right back to square one.

      Its to make things standard instead of creating a new protcol for everything under the sun. Why do you think jabber was started ? XML-RPC is using HTTP so there not reinventing the wheel. I don't know about you, but I like to make my coding job easier.

      I am not even sure why your bringing firewalls into this, this is what XML-RPC is made for. Not sure what kind of content your soo worried about. Last time I checked, there wheren't any "pr0n" sites using XML-RPC.

      RPC was invented to do remote procedure calls, that's what it's for,
      USE IT if you need it.


      ... and what do you think where doing ?!

      and `phpGroupware'? What the hell is that? Oh look, it's your userpage. Riiiiight. Seeing as I haven't heard of it, it's not exactly the default corporate standard, is it. In fact it's... what's the word.. IRRELEVANT! Of course they have more important priorities than some toy "groupware" project.

      This is classic. Ok, so you haven't heard of phpGroupWare. Try going to the site and finding out what its all about before shooting your mouth off. Not sure how this is irrelevant. Evoultions 1.0 version was released today claiming to be a groupware application. Which it really isn't, becuase there no true was to share data with others and work out your goals and what not.

      So, let me get this straight. phpGroupWare is a "toy groupware project". Then, so is Evoultion, Gnome, KDE, the kernel, Xwindow, Emacs, and the other million open souce / free software applications out there. (As far as the toy part) I am not sure how you can go off call it a toy. Sounds like a hard core Windows users to me.

      Sorry for the flames, but some people are just asking for it.

      ROFL

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    10. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

      There have been a few people talking about doing it. I know I won't be doing it anytime soon. But, if there is someone out there willing to do it. Be my guest :)

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    11. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by flacco · · Score: 2
      The point is, that there blocking out access to other projects.

      What do you mean?

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    12. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      Oops. your right. Sorry bro. :)

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    13. Re:Again, this isn't groupware by deKernel · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt...wrong answer

      You and everybody else can try to rationilze using port 80 and HTTP for all types of reasons, but the moral of the story is because people are trying to get around firewalls. Why you ask? Well because SysAdmins open up port 80 for obvious reasons, but have other ports shutdown for more obvious reasons (good or bad).

      You can sit there and tell me till the sky is green that you are just reusing code/technology/methodolgy/voodoo/karma, but the moral of the story is people are trying to be slick and get around their SysAdmins!!!!

      SeeYa

  26. humm..... 1.0 -- is the evolution now over? NO :) by aeneas · · Score: 0
    This is a wonderful mailreader! You gotta love it. Fortunately I dont need MS-Exchange and stuff integration. With :
    • Evolution becoming 1.0
    • Galeon beeing 1.0
    • Nautilus 1.0
    • Gnumeric & Abiword steering towards 1.0
    I have everything a Office-GNOMie ever wants & needs ;-)
  27. It's a shame by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    > I like Evolution... really, I do. Except, I can't use it.

    "But Mom, all the other kids evolve!"

    "If all the other kids jumped off a cliff, would you want to as well?"

    Stupid parents, forbidding evolution. *sigh*

  28. IRDA? (Re:nice, also good for Palm synching) by cosyne · · Score: 2

    From the article, "And built-in synchronization keeps Ximian Evolution users' calendars, contacts and tasks up-to-date with their Palm handheld devices," which i'd consider a must before switching, but does anyone know if it supports irda sync? My palm3e synced to an old-skewl imac 2 years ago (still think it sucks that apple axed the ir port), and ir recently started working in windows, so i'd rather not go back to lugging the cradle around with my laptop if i can help it.

    1. Re:IRDA? (Re:nice, also good for Palm synching) by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it'll work with IrDA. See http://www.pasta.cs.uit.no/pipermail/linux-irda/20 00-May/001426.html for details (not evolution-specific, but it doesn't matter; the backend's the same).

    2. Re:IRDA? (Re:nice, also good for Palm synching) by ciryon · · Score: 1

      Yes, Linux don't care how you communicate. Make just sure you got a /dev/ircomm0

      Ciryon

    3. Re:IRDA? (Re:nice, also good for Palm synching) by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      You can get a more travel friendly hotsync cable pretty cheap.

      As for IrDA in linux, hrmm, I've never checked that out. I support palms, not on Linux but I wouldn't imagine it'd be too hard.

      The way it works in windows is that it just uses the IR port using the serial protocol. Looking at the linux kernel it seems you could do this either with IrCOMM or IrTTY (both?) however I don't have time now to test it.

      -- iCEBaLM

  29. NOT FREE SOFTWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'll be modded down as a troll but I want to "call" the Slashdot community on this one.

    The exchange connector is NOT FREE SOFTWARE. Why is slashdot not calling a jihad against this? Is it only because the darling of Slashdot, Miguel, is the author? Were this ANY other company you'd all be foaming at the mouth and starting sourceforge projects to make a "free" version.

    The benefits of a free connector would be great...I'd love to use Mutt against our exchange server at work.

    For a group of people who have been at the genesis of every holy war against something that even smells slightly of proprietary, you're all quick to praise Ximian.

    Personally, this stinks. If they REALLY wanted to help the free software community, this is EXACTLY the thing that should be released no strings attached. What's next, a Ximian-only implimentation of the MS-Word format?

  30. No more emulation software please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems these sorts of products are enablers for microsoft to conitinue onward in the datacenter. Rather than legitimize exchange and .net - we would be better served providing a superior alternative.

  31. Okie dokey - time to figure out how to migrate! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, now I need to figure out how to migrate my email from Outlook 2002 (not Outlook Express), to Evolution. I _think_ I've got a way, but not sure. Has this feature been added to a recent version of Evolution?

    The previous way I figured out how I could do this was to fire up Eudora, as it could open Outlook 2000 email files (not sure about Outlook 2002) - then once you've got your email in Eudora's format (related to mbox format, as I recall - could be wrong), then it was easy to convert to a UNIX way of things. If Evolution doesn't do this automatically, it certainly should. That's one of the big challenges of moving people from MS software to anything else - converting those file formats with ease, and doing so _perfectly_, every time.

    1. Re:Okie dokey - time to figure out how to migrate! by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

      If your punking out of a Exchange box, you *should* be able to just bunch into it via IMAP and grab the goodies.
      Either that or put on the gloves and write some sort of horrid little script to do it. The Obj Model is pretty gnarled but Python handles it just fine.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:Okie dokey - time to figure out how to migrate! by pere · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just copy all your local Outlook-folders to the mail-server.

      Connect with Evolution, and copy them back.

      I think you can mail all your contacts to yourself, but I didnt get vCard to work with the last beta. Haven't tried the last release.

  32. Connector not free by prestwich · · Score: 1

    Hmm - so we are going to have to pay for Ximian Connector (and by the way its in 10 packs I guess per seat?). That isn't going to help is it.

  33. What's so special about Mandrake 8.1 by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    What's so special about Mandrake 8.1 that it can't use Evolution. Ximian supports Mandrake 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 and 8.0 but not 8.1.

    1. Re:What's so special about Mandrake 8.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Mandrake 8.1 does use Evo. However, it's an old version (0.13, I think?). You can, however, grab the binaries off of the Ximian ftp site (use the Mandrake 8.0 binaries) and load up the newer version yourself. I do not use the Ximian Desktop and only wanted Ximian Evolution so I had to grab six or eight different tar files from the ftp site to get all of the dependencies worked out, but if you start with the evolution tar and try to install it, it'll tell you all the updates you need to make.

      I just loaded 0.99.2 onto my system the day before yesterday this way and, so far, it works great. Imported all of my old mail (mbox format) without a problem. Only downside I found was having to key in all of my email addresses...

      Hope this helps,

      C0deMonkey

    2. Re:What's so special about Mandrake 8.1 by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ximian was waiting on the Evolution 1.0 release to release the Mandrake 8.1 version of it. Expect an 8.1 release in the next two weeks.

  34. Exchange connector and GPL by Otis_INF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An exchange connector is a library with a familiar interface that will handle all connections with the exchange server. Now, this Exchange connector for Evolution is not GPL-ed software but proprietry closed source software. Because afaik in memory linking is also prohibited, how is Ximian going to solve any GPL conflicts? Or is the GPL not able to force its license on the connector?

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    1. Re:Exchange connector and GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's likely is that it will run over sockets rather than linking in. That said, they own the original copyright on Evolution, so they can re-release portions under whatever license they like.

    2. Re:Exchange connector and GPL by clare-ents · · Score: 2

      I think they're fine providing they are seperate release.

      Product 1 : GPL'd program with plugin capability. Source available.
      Product 2 : Proprietry plugin for product 1. No source.

      The GPL would only prevent you from distributing both together unless they can reasonably be considered an aggregation - which if they have seperate installers they can.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    3. Re:Exchange connector and GPL by v_thunder · · Score: 1

      The Ximian Connector is a separate process that communicates with the rest of Evolution via a CORBA interface.

    4. Re:Exchange connector and GPL by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Um well let's see, they control the license on Evolution so they can make any exceptions to the GPL that they want including converting it to total proprietary software, as long as they dont link to non LGPL or BSD licensed libraries that they don't control the licenses for.

    5. Re:Exchange connector and GPL by jjeff · · Score: 1

      Now i dont know much about the licensing of these sort of things but isnt gtk LGPL? and evolution is most definately using those libraries.

      --
      when everything is working perfectly.. BREAK SOMETHING before something else FUCKS up!
  35. Binaries Only by uslinux.net · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those of you who just want the Evolution 1.0 binaries, and not the whole Ximian desktop, go to ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-gnome/ and get the following packages:
    * evolution
    * libgnome-pilot0
    * libgtkhtml20
    * libnss3
    Note, I installed under Debian, so other systems may be slightly different, however, this should be a very good place to start

    1. Re:Binaries Only by SETY · · Score: 1

      Well Redhat 7.1 seems to have dependencies up the wazoo!!!
      [root@fool /root]# rpm -Uvh evolution-1.0-ximian.3.i386.rpm
      error: failed dependencies:
      bonobo >= 1.0.14 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgtkhtml20 >= 0.16.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      gtkhtml >= 0.16.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgal18 >= 0.18.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      bonobo-conf >= 0.14 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libnss3 >= 0.9.5 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      oaf >= 0.6.7 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobo-print.so.2 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobo.so.2 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobo_conf.so.0 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobox.so.2 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgal.so.18 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgconf-1.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgconf-gtk-1.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgnomeprint.so.15 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgnomevfs.so.0 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgtkhtml.so.20 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libnss3.so is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      liboaf.so.0 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libsmime3.so is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libssl3.so is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgpilotd.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgpilotdcm.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgpilotdconduit.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libpisock.so.4 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3

  36. Re:serious competition for outlook? OSX soon? by alfredo · · Score: 1

    Look for these guys to make the port. XDarwin

    Mixing open source and proprietary is not bad, if it educates the public about the opensource world. Opensource is about freedom and innovation, as opposed to MS's "Freedom to Innovation®"

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  37. phpGroupWare has xml-rpc by codepunk · · Score: 1

    This is already in the works and you can also download a windows and linux client written in delphi and kylix that hooks to phpGroupWare. Check out their website they have links to the downloads.

    --


    Got Code?
  38. Re:NOT FREE SOFTWARE - so what? by pubjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The exchange connector is NOT FREE SOFTWARE. Why is slashdot not calling a jihad against this?

    Why are you asking us to?

    Yes, some free software fanatics read Slashdot, but there are also a lot of us who think that free (in both senses) software and non-free can co-exist. In fact, I believe Ximian's strategy is the most sensible for new generation software companies - give away the basic product, sell the add-ons.

  39. If you're having problems connecting... by Linux+Freak · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...it's not necessarily a busy mirror problem. I think it's real-carpet that's dying. I've had massive problems with it just hanging (and having to do kill -9's as root to get rid of it). I'm not the only one who has experienced this problem either; I've talked to others on IRC who have also had problems. The trick seems to be to remove everything out of /var/cache/redcarpet and then running it again.

    By the way, I just connected and it seems there is an "Urgent Update" for red-carpet, which brings it up to version 1.1.4-ximian.8. (Sorry, I can't tell you what my previous version was, 'cuz I already upgraded. :p But it was a Red Hat 7.2 system upgraded to the latest Helix Gnome only about a month and a bit ago).
    Gnome is looking hella good these days. I'm sure Evolution is just as good, but I have no reason to give up Pine anytime soon. ;-)

  40. Exchange Drop-in Replacements by brotherofstlopus · · Score: 1
    Oracle has been advertising drop-in replacements for Exchange[link](If I were an MSCE I'd jump on that chance)

    If only OpenMail were opened: the last best hope Exchange replacement is explained in this article on linuxworld.com. That hope was OpenMail by HP.

    1. Re:Exchange Drop-in Replacements by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      HP OpenMail has been bought by Samsung. Apparently they are less intimidated by Microsoft.

  41. Sorry by codepunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    spouting off before I read the message

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Sorry by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, I wrote the Kylix client and I am using your librarys :) I setup this /. account a long time ago, before I started using the name jengo ... :)

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
  42. haha by diamondc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they gotta make money somehow, dude. giving away free software ISNT one way of making money.

    --
    "I keep looking in the want-ads under 'revolutionary' but there don't seem to be any listings.. "
    1. Re:haha by praxim · · Score: 1

      I've been saying that forever. I think it should be part of the Slashdot logo.

    2. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so why did Miguel and his boys launch the wholy jihad against TrollTech then?

      A bunch of fucking hypocrites.

    3. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because in the case of Qt the developement platform was not free. In the case of evolution everything about it is free except for the bits that connect directly to an exchange server. There is a world of difference between those two cases.

    4. Re:haha by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1

      It's hypocrisy plain and simple. Miguel would not allow Trolltech to make money on proprietary software, yet this is exactly what he is doing. The scope of the software does not matter. Trolltech had every _right_ to sell proprietary software. Miguel and the GNOME crowd bashed Trolltech from choices _KDE_ made. In the end Qt is now free enough even for RMS, yet they have a stained public image from Miguel tossing gross claims that they could turn "evil" and force people to bow to them via control of the desktop. Where did he get such ideas? He _imagined_ them. There is nothing to link what Qt does to the likes of Microsoft, which I'm sure Miguel was thinking of when bashing KDE/QT.

      So you are saying Trolltech should not be allowed to charge people to use a proprietary Qt? Miguel thinks they shouldn't.

      --
      Dijkstra Considered Dead
  43. Talk about hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all this holier-than-thou smear attacks against Qt/Trolltech and KDE, the premier GNOME outfit is now offering closed, proprietary software as well:

    Ximian Connector for Microsoft Exchange add-on products will be sold and distributed under a proprietary license. Interested customers should visit Ximian at www.ximian.com for more information. The Ximian Connector is priced at $69 ($599 for 10 pack, $1499 for 25 pack) and comes with 90 days of web-based installation support.

    I have nothing against commercial software, but with this move GNOME-ers have lost the right to ever, ever bitch in any way shape or form about the fact that Qt is a commercial toolkit or that KDE is based on it.

    Looks like Ximian needs to make money too and they finally woke up that open-source is great and everything...but it doesn't pay your employees' salaries. Something Trolltech has known all along and got so much slack for it...until the core GNOME-ers finally realized the same thing.

    Welcome to the real world.

    1. Re:Talk about hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > KDE has not always been free software

      Correction, KDE was ALWAYS free software. It was always GPL'd. Qt wasn't until the QPL.

    2. Re:Talk about hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The toolkit is just something too large past. Any idiot will agree that qt is part of kde. Ever try building KDE without QT?

    3. Re:Talk about hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, "Linking" is not the same thing as "being".

      I suggest that you open up a terminal, and type in "man dlopen".

      Qt has never been a part of KDE, and it never will, dumbass.

      I bet you were paid by Ximian to spread this bigotry. Shame on you. I am also a poor free software programmer, but at least I don't sell out to evil corporations like Ximian.

    4. Re:Talk about hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you currently run KDE without QT? yes or no

      Can you currently run evolution without the plugin? yes or no

    5. Re:Talk about hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, how about KDE makes exstensive use of qt? But I hope you realize that the guy is basically right. Maybe QT is not an official part of KDE but it definitely is part of KDE- without QT there would be no KDE.

  44. Secure MIME? by TheFlu · · Score: 2

    Anyone know why the Secure MIME option isn't available from the security mail settings? Is this a feature planned for later, or am I missing a package of some sort?

    1. Re:Secure MIME? by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 3, Informative

      S/Mime is slated for 1.1 or 1.2 release. See http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350 for details.

    2. Re:Secure MIME? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S/MIME will be one of the features for evolution 1.2
      there simply wasn't enough time to do it for 1.0.

  45. Time is the key to.. by saqmaster · · Score: 1

    ... making something like this successful.

    Microsoft Exchange Server with the Outlook client is a tried and tested product. It's been around for donkeys years and several other projects have been created and tried to compete, and some have failed and the remainder are just sitting on the back burner really.

    Lotus Domino and Novells Groupwise do have a market share, IBM even give Domino/Notes away with servers (well, the used to, not sure if they still do) but do you see them overtaking Exchange & Outlook? No.

    So sure, Outlook suffers from the scripting issues which spawn viri, but that hasn't made the world rush to go buy Notes or Groupwise or whatever - so why should this product make any difference?

    I've not actually looked at this product as I can't get to their site now (slasheffected).. But what does it really have to offer that could even put Notes etc. in the shade?..

    It'd have to be some kind of miracle..

    --
    "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story..."
    1. Re:Time is the key to.. by B00mZilla · · Score: 1

      "Lotus Domino and Novells Groupwise do have a market share, IBM even give Domino/Notes away with servers (well, the used to, not sure if they still do) but do you see them overtaking Exchange & Outlook? No. "

      Not to be too much of a troll, but its the other way around. Notes seats had a very big lead on Exchange seats last time I checked...you can see on Lotus's site--they usually crow about it once a quarter or so.

    2. Re:Time is the key to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Primarily (at this time) it's got a nice low price. Instead of installing Win2000 Small Business and dealing with the hassles (NT4 SBE required special Service Packs and was a pain to maintain - I think 2000 SBE does at well) you can
      do a nice clean Linux install w/ mail and web services.

      The biggest thing holding Linux back at the moment are consultants. Most of the consulting companies out there (esp. smaller ones) only know Microsoft. It's like the old saying "when you only have a hammer everything looks like a nail". Well, they only have MS so everything looks like a MS solution.

      Most of them seem to be unwilling/unable to learn anything new. They're pushing MS crap down their clients throats even when that isn't the best solution (is it really a good idea to migrate away from Novell just because your consultant says "yeah, 2000 is much better")? Consumer ignorance coupled with ignorant consultants - great for MS but bad for everybody else.

  46. NOTHING WRONG WITH CHARGING FOR CONNECTOR by teambpsi · · Score: 1

    And what did you have to pay to get Outlook in the first place?

    This is a small price to pay to reach ESCAPE velocity from Outlook.

    If you're really concerned about the price, why not submit your timesheet to Ximian with the hours you spent helping develop the connector -- i'm sure they will cut you deal ;)

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
  47. MY Exchange integration... by Jethro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use PINE for my Exchange integration Email work. Works perfectly - apparently PINE is as much integrated with Exchange as Evolution is, until they start selling their component that'll connect to the calendar.

    The calendar is the only reason I keep Outlook around, really.

    My real problem with Evolution is, it looks like Outlook. I cannot use Outlook for Email. I find the interface to be completely horrible, unintuitive and hard to keep organized. The whole "Rules" thing just does not work. With PINE, if you want to save a message to a different mailbox, you hit "S <ENTER>". With Outlook you have to Drag'n'Drop. Imagine that for 200 messages.

    Maybe it's because I've been using PINE for god-knows how long, but GUI mail clients just don't work for me.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Raleel · · Score: 2

      actually, evolution has at least as much integration as pine with exchange.

      I use pine. I use evolution. I like them both :)

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    2. Re:MY Exchange integration... by OSgod · · Score: 1

      How abotu select all the message you want to move and drag them together to the other box? Or write a custom rule to do it for you automatically based on an event (received, etc.)?

      Outlook is probably the best general distribution e-mail client in corporate America today. Of course with competition as usable as Lotus Notes (now theirs an interface for you that really lacks any user friendliness) it's no wonder.

    3. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's what I was trying to say. Actually I was going the other way round though. It seems to me that the only 'integration' Evolution has that PINE doesn't is that it has the same look'n'feel as Outlook, and that's a disadvantage to me (though obviously not to everyone).

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "With PINE, if you want to save a message to a different mailbox, you hit "S "."

      Pine is my all-time favorite email app since that's what we used in college, but we have to use Outlook at work. In Outlook, the same can be accomplished without drag 'n' drop. Just hit CTL-SHIFT-V, then arrow-key to the mail folder you want. All of the keyboard commands are listed next to the menu drop-downs, so they're pretty easy to pick up if you want to migrate away from the rodent.

    5. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Selecting all the messages I want is still annoying, when in PINE you can do that with a handful of keystrokes rather than scrolling through a whole lot of messages (200 is actually very, very low, I'm usually in the 500s before I notice how horrible it is).

      As for rules - I don't like my mail going into many different boxes BEFORE I read it, so that's out. I DID create a whole lot of rules - about 50 - for all the people/programs/groups whom I usually receive mail from, and occasionally I'd go into the Rules Wizard thing, choose "Run Now" and let 'er rip.

      Problem - it doesn't work. It'll move SOME of the messages, but not all. I find no rhyme or reason for this. I've asked the local 'experts' and they have no idea.

      To this day I've never heard anyone talk about Outlook and say "This is an excellent mail client", or even "This is a good mail client" or heck, "It's decent." Why people put up with it is beyond me.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    6. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Jethro · · Score: 2

      I just tried it - I hit CTRL-SHIFT-V and nothing happens.

      I take that back - Outlook is now hung. I don't know if you were serious or if I feel for it (;

      Here's the thing though - in PINE, "S <ENTER>" has already saved it to the default mailbox based on the name or nickname of the sender - no need to arrow-key around to the mailbox you want. That's what I'm looking for - I'm not anti-mouse, I'm for "it takes .01 seconds" rather than "it takes 2 seconds".

      Oh, I got your keyboard shortcut to work - it defaults to INBOX.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    7. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Raleel · · Score: 2

      Ya, pretty much. My personal feeling is that I like the three pane view. I want pine with a 3 pane view! :)

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    8. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Really? I use Outlook with that turned off (:

      You can always submit a request to the PINE wishlist thing, but I think they all want to keep PINE in a 1-pane thing (:

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    9. Re:MY Exchange integration... by shaka · · Score: 2

      Uhmmm....

      I am a long time Pine user, and I used to like Pine. Sometimes, I tried switching to Mutt, but it just didn't cut it for me.
      Now, I exclusively use Evolution. Why, you may ask? Because with Evolution, if you want to save a message to a different mailbox, you drag'n'drop. With Pine you have to hit "S <ENTER>". Imagine that for 200 messages.

      The reason is, I usually keep my mail very organized, in folders and subfolders, organization, name, if it's a record company, festival, whatever. In Pine, it it REALLY, REALLY hard to move a lots of messages from one folder to one other folder. Basically, you have to sit there and hit "S <ENTER>" 200 times.
      In Evolution, I just mark them, drag them, and drop them. Wonderful!

      Plus, I get all the goodies with keyboard shortcuts whenever I need them.

      --
      :wq!
    10. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Jethro · · Score: 2
      In Pine, it it REALLY, REALLY hard to move a lots of messages from one folder to one other folder. Basically, you have to sit there and hit "S <ENTER>" 200 times.
      Or, you could hit ":" on messages you want to select, and then use the (A)pply command to save them to a different folder.

      Or you can use the Search-select key, ";", tell it to select by text in the from, to, subject or body of the Email, and then use the (A)pply command. For example, to get all the ones with "Festical" in the Subject line, you'd go ";ssFestivalENTER>"

      I guess I should've, as usual, elaborated more on the Outlook thing. The Save Messages isn't the ONLY thing that bothers me -it was just the first thing that came to mind.
      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    11. Re:MY Exchange integration... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt a keyboard shortcut is going to hang a program. When I press ctl-shift-v the last folder I moved something to is highlighted. I can use the up, down, left and right arrows to choose whatever folder I want to file a message to. This is in Outlook 2000, btw.

    12. Re:MY Exchange integration... by hanulec · · Score: 1

      ah yeah.. ever hear of the aggregate command set. enable the following in your .pinerc

      enable-aggregate-command-set
      and then you can query your messages all sorts of ways and save mass quanties at a time.

      i use pine to access exchange also, via imap4. thankfully now i use Exchange Web Access a lot to see my calendar.. thus allowing me to be 98% M$ free.
      --
      https://www.hanulec.com

    13. Re:MY Exchange integration... by V.P. · · Score: 1
      Hehe, I submitted that as an RFE in their bugzilla system (#10450) and their reply was: "Feature bloat". In every damn text-based MUA you can do 's-ENTER' and be prompted to save the message to a mailbox (e.g. by sender). Not to mention that you can't access regular mbox files without 'importing' them.

      How do they suppose that mutt/pine/elm users are going to migrate to evolution if they regard basic stuff like these as 'feature bloat' (while displaying HTML spam in all its glory isn't) ?

    14. Re:MY Exchange integration... by belphegore · · Score: 1

      Actually, the one major thing I think Outlook does better than Evolution is exactly this -- allow you to file messages somewhat easily. I have 626 email folders on my IMAP server, going as much as 8 levels deep in a tree. With outlook, I can modify to toolbar to have a "move selected messages" button, then click that -- most recent 10 destinations are in a pull down. If I want some other folder, then just like Pine, I can type the first character of the folder name, then the -> arrow to expand the folder (instead of pine's tab-completion), then type the first character of the next level folder, etc. Easy. And Outlook even seems pretty good about re-collapsing folders. Evolution on the other hand doesn't let you type folder names, so you have to scroll and click with the mouse (slow with 600+ folders), and automatically expands all the folders for you (making it really hard to find what you're looking for). In my experience, Pine and Outlook are both about equally usable, evolution is a little worse, but could easily be improved.

  48. Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by deragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Greetings.

    Ximian is great, except for one little detail, which prevents me to recommend it. From what I gathered in the monkey talk chat room and elsewhere is that once you install Ximian, you are mostly stuck with the current version of your distribution.

    For instance, Ximian and Red Hat 7.1. Red carpet does not allow (at least I have not found any links) to upgrade to Red Hat 7.2. I was told that one must uninstall Ximian Gnome before upgrading to RH 7.2. That is not very user friendly. BTW, how does one uninstall Ximian Gnome? Anybody have the receipe for upgrading a system with Ximian installed? An easy receipe BTW? (Not manually identify and manually remove each rpms for instance).

    This system upgrade is the one serious piece missing, which for the moment prevents me to recommend Ximian to others. And by ricochet, I cannot recommend Ximian's Evolution.

    Sincerely,
    Hans Deragon

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    1. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by Linux+Freak · · Score: 2

      Er, I don't know where you heard that, but I was using Ximian Gnome with Red Hat 7.1, and upgraded to 7.2 (which installs its own version of Gnome), and then reinstalled Ximian Gnome overtop of that.

      Zero problems (except for the red-carpet problem I described in an earlier post).

    2. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 3, Informative
      This question is a Ximian FAQ:
      How do I uninstall Ximian Gnome?

      If you're unhappy with Ximian GNOME, please write to support@ximian.com and let us know what the problem is. It's entirely possible we can help you, and you won't need to remove your desktop software.

      If you really want to remove Ximian GNOME, it's quite easy: just use Red Carpet to uninstall all the Ximian GNOME packages. Start Red Carpet, then go to the Ximian GNOME channel, click "Remove," then choose "Select All" from the "Edit" menu. Click "Remove Packages." Red Carpet will remove all the GNOME software from your system. Then, remove Red Carpet itself, either by using Red Carpet or your native package management system.

      Once that's done, proceed with your upgrade as if you never had Ximian Gnome installed on your system...
    3. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by deragon · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are the first doing this I have heard of. Thanks for the info. Did you lose any configuration? I suspect not, since configuration files are stored in your home directory, but I am asking just in case.

      Hans Deragon

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    4. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by deragon · · Score: 1

      This is neat. Where did you find the FAQ? I searched on http://www.ximian.com and found some very basic FAQs on the product pages. Either I am totally lost or their FAQ is not well placed on their website. I do not find it on their support page.

      Thanks,
      Hans Deragon

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    5. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I didn't find it on Ximian's site. If you have Ximian Gnome installed, you can simply click "Help", and select "Frequently Asked Questions". I believe the FAQ is installed with Ximian in file:///usr/share/gnome/html/ximian-faq/index.html . At least, that's where it is on my RedHat 7.2 install with Ximian Gnome.

      I've never been a big fan of using the "upgrade" option for any operating system, though... there are usually so many things broken that it's far easier to simply back up the old installation and install from scratch.

    6. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by xcomputer_man · · Score: 1

      A few months ago I installed Ximian Gnome on one of my Mandrake 8.0 workstations (purely out of curiousity). I liked the interface, but there wasn't really anything I saw to make me justify the installation. Like you, I also gathered in the MonkeyTalk chatroom that there is really no way to uninstall Ximian Gnome (at least that's what the Ximian guy said).

      But I went ahead and upgraded to Mandrake 8.1 anyway. The upgrade was smooth, and I was returned to a standard Mandrake Gnome desktop, with all necessary libraries and packages appropriately replaced. I did see a few ximian packages still lying around after that, but for the most part I was able to restore the system.

      So I wouldn't conclude that Ximian Gnome ties you down to your current distro version (at least it didn't for me).

    7. Re:Ximian and Distribution upgrades. by nuintari · · Score: 2

      Not true, upgrade your distro, replacing any ximian gnoem packages it wants to replace with vanila gnome stuff. Then run red-carpet, and let it run hog wild fixing everything. It works fine fer me.

      Maybe a problem if you don't have a massive load of bandwidth like I do though....

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  49. xml-rpc interface for MS CDO Objects by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Gents I do not have time to hack it together but it would also be damn easy to expose ms cdo via xml-rpc to provide a exchange connector.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:xml-rpc interface for MS CDO Objects by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      Well, to connect to the Exchange server, it's just a matter of reverse engineering two DCE RPC services -- the name service provider interface (nspi), and the exchange message store message database (emsmdb). The name service provider seems to be the easier of the two, since it's only for the address boook, and resolving names, and uses a fairly straightforward interface, the emsmdb on the other hand consists mainly of four RPC calls, one is for connecting, one for disconnecting, and two that are simply named DoRpc and GetMoreRpc. For those of you that don't understand, that means they used RPC to encapsulate RPC (probably MAPI). Simply trying to expose CDO would pose other problems, including security and an additional single point of failure. If simply contacting the Exchange server was the goal, it might be just as easy to extend Wine to be able to make RPC calls, and then use a lightweight version of wine with the native Outlook Exchange DLLs to call the server.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  50. Exchange contacts via LDAP by abram_fettig · · Score: 1
    I'm currently using Evolution to access my company's Exchange addressbook via LDAP. Here's what you need to do:

    Go to Contacts. Pick Tools -> Addressbook sources from the menu.

    Hit the Add button.

    Under the Basic tab: Account name can be whatever you want. Server name should be the IP address of the Exchange server. Check the "Requires Authentication" checkbox, and enter your e-mail address (the address of your mailbox on the Exchange Server).

    Under the Advanced tab: Leave the port at 389, the default. Under search base, enter a string of text like this:

    ou=My_Facility, o=My_Company, c=US

    If you don't know what to enter for ou and o, you've got two options. If you have a nice Exchange admin who doesn't mind you using an unsupported e-mail client, you can ask them. Otherwise, you can use an LDAP browsing tool to check out the Exchange server.

    Make sure you enter the country code! (that's the c=US in my sample above). Leaving this out made my addressbook not work.

    For search scope, pick "Sub."

    -Abe

    1. Re:Exchange contacts via LDAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, this works with Exchange 5.5, but not Exchange 2000. I don't think you can make Evolution talk LDAP to Active Directory.

  51. Offshoots by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, anyone know of any other projects based on the evolution code-base? I kinda like evolution from what I have seen of the pre-release versions. It looks like a real progression. However, I am sure there are alot of people like myself who like the advanced email features that arent really present in other linux-based mail programs. However, I really do not want a calender, schedules, task lists etc.

    In the same way that the Mozilla code base has been hacked - in a generally reductionist way - to produce the much-improved Galeon and promising K-Meleon, I feel that Evolution could benefit from the same process.

    Offers, anyone? Im a little busy right now.....

    1. Re:Offshoots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      since it is developed using bonobo compents, if you don't use the calender or todo list, they don't get loaded into memory and you will never notice.

    2. Re:Offshoots by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Hey, anyone know of any other projects based on the evolution code-base? I kinda like evolution from what I have seen of the pre-release versions. It looks like a real progression. However, I am sure there are alot of people like myself who like the advanced email features that arent really present in other linux-based mail programs. However, I really do not want a calender, schedules, task lists etc.

      Then take those components out. Evolution is one of the first large-scale demonstrations of the Bonobo model. There are 15+ components that join together to form Evolution. There's only a tiny amount of glue code to make them all work together. The e-mail, calendar, todo, components are all completely separate and standalone.

      It's the same principle as Mozilla with the Gecko engine. Other browsers are free to use the Gecko engine and implement their own "glue" at the front. Evolution just takes it the next step (and one step closer to how Windows has worked for many years now).

      Offers, anyone? Im a little busy right now.....

      Pay someone to do it.

    3. Re:Offshoots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok thanks, I dont know anything about bonobo, but as it would appear to be straightfoward I may well have a look at it.

      --MB

  52. Shift and Control by eclectric · · Score: 1

    They're wonderful keys that allow you to select more than one message at time. much faster than hitting "s " 200 times.

    1. Re:Shift and Control by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Ok, scrolling through 200+ messages, and ctrl-clicking all the ones you want, and then dragging them - sure, that'll work.

      It's still faster in PINE ( ; t f <text> <ENTER> a s <mailbox-name> is the complicated way).

      The thing is, with PINE if you're saving individual messages, it'll default to a mailbox name based on the sender's name or alias you defined - no need to 'drag' as it were - which is the real time saver. If you have seevral hundred saved-message boxes, you don't need to start looking for them. mail from "Anonymous@Coward.com" will always, by default, go into the same box when you hit "S <ENTER>" - that's what I'm missing in Outlook which is making my INBOX so cluttered.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    2. Re:Shift and Control by mini+me · · Score: 1

      Unless they are all in a row, you're still going to end up Ctrl+Clicking every single message.

      Personally, I'd rather use the keyboard for the entire process and just hit S!

    3. Re:Shift and Control by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      That's why Evolution has the search bar. Type in the search bar, click "Find Now", Ctrl-A (select all), drag to where you want them.

      I've used both PINE and Evo, and I call it a draw.

    4. Re:Shift and Control by Panaflex · · Score: 2

      Use the search bar, luke.

      You can search for multiple items and use boolean logic. like from: boss, subject: picnic. I know pine won't do that.

      seriously, there's a search bar... you can search on any header or message content. ctrl-a, press ctrl+shift+M, select target foler, ok or just drag and drop into the folder list.

      done

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    5. Re:Shift and Control by Lunastorm · · Score: 1

      It's almost that easy in Evolution too. You could just hold down Ctrl, and use the arrow keys to navigate and press space to select.

      --
      You die too easily.
  53. I'm very concerned for Ximian by yobbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not trying to troll here, but I have strong doubts that Ximian will survive. But, before I continue, let me congratulate them on Evolution, as it is a very high quality product, and my preferred mail client.

    From the newsforge article, quotes from Nat Friedman, vice president of product development:

    "We expect less than we would have expected awhile ago. I think that people understand that businesses have to survive. And the people know that the bloody carcasses of Open Source companies line the horizon right now."

    and

    "It is proprietary is because they (Ximian) intend to make money from it."

    Effectively what I see here is an admission that open source software just isn't getting the bills paid (at least for Ximian, and Eazel RIP), and that they need to sell proprietry software in order to keep afloat.

    Unless we see open source companies like ximian generate significantly more revenue from services related to their open source projects, we just aren't gonna have the pleasure of using new products from them for much longer.

    1. Re:I'm very concerned for Ximian by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1
      I'm concerned as well. However, I am concerned about those who contributed to open software projects and never get paid for their work and suddenly these projects become closed source projects. I have no problem at all with selling software for Linux and Ximian can do it, however, they cannot make money from the free labour of the open source community developers. This is not fair.

      Look at what seems to happen to GNOME. The official GNOME CVS source tree (anoncvs.gnome.org/pub/gnome) is out of sync. Why?

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re:I'm very concerned for Ximian by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is nothing new for OS/FS companies like GNOME and various Linux distros in general. You have to figure out a new business model. The same old model that MICROSOFT says is mandatory to make money says it is the ONLY model to make money in the software business. It is up to business people to determine a new model.

      Did MS make all the money they have now, back in the mid 80's? No. They have to develop a successful model. Regardless of all the things MS has done wrong, developing a successful business model is one thing they have done very well. Now times are changing and more and more is becoming digital and the legal system can not keep up with it. Models will have to change, people's feelings will be hurt, companies will fail, and when the smoke clears there will be a few champions standing a hill of slain compaines proving what they have to offer is going to be the de facto norm (at least for a while).

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  54. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't mean to be cynical or anything, but wouldn't it be better for Linux developers to take their own path and develop their own products, rather than try to emulate and work with Microsoft software? Yes, I know, they have market saturation and all that..but where's the appeal in using Evolution when in all likelihood Microsoft will break compatibility with it in every consecutive release? Most tech. managers faced with the choice of Outlook or a great Outlook-like program that unfortunately breaks every time they update Exchange is going to pick Outlook itself, even if it isn't free.

  55. Re:Where is IBM? by hughk · · Score: 2
    Please no. I thought at first that I was the only one but it is clear that others agree. Lotus however tends to work and it is admittedly popular. Rather Lotus under Linux than MS Exchange.

    However, what should be remembered is that Notes is a database and workflow application. It is not an Emailer or even a PIM.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  56. Print Quirk? by BocaLoca · · Score: 1

    Maybe a little off-topic but...

    Is there a way to change the default print command from 'lpr' to 'mpage -2ft'? Every time I change it, it goes back to 'lpr' the next time I print. Galeon remembers the command, but evolution does not...

    Is there a config file or X resource that will allow me to permanently change this?

    Just wondering...

    1. Re:Print Quirk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please file a bug report in Bugzilla, product "gnome-print" and i'll look at it. It is a 10 minute hack.

    2. Re:Print Quirk? by BocaLoca · · Score: 1

      I filed a report:

      #66045

      Thanks,

      --jrh

  57. Absolutely by marm · · Score: 2

    I'd be the first to admit that I much prefer KDE/Qt, both from a user and technical viewpoint, but it is excellent to see GNOME and GTK+ applications making great strides too.

    There was a point not so long ago where I feared that GTK+ and GNOME had lost their way completely, and that would have been sad - I think the friendly (and sometimes not-so-friendly ;) rivalry and cross-pollination between the systems has been a bigger win than the split of resources has been a loss. Neither system can afford to sit on their laurels for too long or else the other will take up the slack and make them irrelevant.

    It does remain to be seen, however, what will happen with GTK+/GNOME 2.0 - it has been a very long time in coming, and in the meantime KDE 2.x has built up a very large (but not unassailable) head of steam. It's very important that the GNOME guys get 2.0 right (not like the 1.0 release - remember that disaster?) if they want to continue to be more than a bit-part player.

    I watch the mailing lists with interest... it's a great soap opera :)

  58. Re:Where is IBM? by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1

    This is what many people fail to understand about Notes; it is primarily a database application. Many people use it solely for email, and then complain about it. The one thing that I like very much about Lotus Notes is that users have the ability to easily build their own custom views in order to look at the data however they want. This keeps the database creator/maintainer from having to do it for them.

    --
    "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
  59. Haha. by xmutex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Now Outlook can start facing some serious competition..."

    C'mon! Are you serious? I realize it's cool that it's released, but don't be a moron. I'm sure MS and all are just quakin' in their boots.

    --

    jack's bicycle is music to my ears
  60. Hahahha by nebby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I love how a shitty mail client clone for L00nUx comes out and it's praised to hell and back, yet the same day a revolutionary vehicle control system is revealed by an astounting inventor and it's slammed because it has nothing to do with Open Sores.

    You guys are pathetic.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Hahahha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what ridiculously lame comment. If that's what you have to offer at your half-assed little website, little nebby, I think I'll pass.

    2. Re:Hahahha by nebby · · Score: 2

      Yeah my website sucks. I realized that long before you did.

      Though it's not "half-assed" .. it was a two year long experiment that resulted in like 15,000 lines of code.

      --
      --
  61. Re:Please try to keep posts on topic. (In Italian) by Fucky+Badger · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    What are you smoking, and where can i score some? Translation:

    That is most excellent!

    Hour a sure text from which the great pleasure it will be induced in the reader...

    The tide obtains more soil from your laundry.

    The cheese on the pavement is on fire.

    Your pants have said me to go to the warehouse and to take some eggs. It is this correcting?

    How one increases the page on this card of the message of Web?

    Something is died within, or is that hardly your ass here?

  62. GroupWise by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    I'd pay for the thing if I could use it with GroupWise here where I work. They refuse to use the web interface...probably because they don't know how to run it without it much less with it. I just hate having the boss crawl up my tuckas because I didn't get his message... b/c he refused to send it via regular email. blech.

  63. Re:Please Read... URGENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shake it up thoroughly, and then try to open the bottle.
    Works like a charm.

    Now quit wasting our time with your stupid messages...

  64. FTP Mirrors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so ftp.ximian.com is clogged. Good fro Ximian! Sounds like Evolution is getting a lot of attention. But, of course, it's bad for those of us trying to get at it. Anyone know of some mirrors?

    While I'm at it, does anyone know specifically which RPM's are needed to use Evolution without Ximian GNOME on RedHat 7.2 (assuming that all the updates from /pub/redhat/updates are installed)?

  65. Who needs it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Sorry, but I don't get why everyone is so excited about some
    company releasing an Outlook clone. If you like it so much,
    why don't you use Outlook in the first place?



    I doubt that "Microsoft is evil, so make products that imitate
    theirs" is that good a strategy. The world won't be any better
    when every windows luser is a linux luser, people won't get a
    clue just by switching their OS.



    Where are the times gone when Free Software was about building
    great programs that work, instead of caring about integration
    with proprietary crap like Exchange? It's Exchange and Outlook
    that are broken, not their free, standards-compliant counterparts!

  66. RPM Dependencies, KDE, & Pilot-link... by Spoing · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Anyone know if the dependencies between KDE PIM that ships with 2.2.1/2.2.2 & Evolution pre-releases have been resolved?

    Evolution wanted one version of pilot-link, and KDE PIM wanted another...but the packages are mutually exclusive (a rarity, but it happened).

    Can this be forced & patched with a simlink?

    Personally, I prefer Evolution to KDE PIM, but I'm looking after a few different computers and want to leave the option of what one to choose up to the user. For now, Evolution wins so KDE PIM gets yanked though it would be nice not to have to pick and choose.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  67. Mozilla Mail on Windows by grendelkhan · · Score: 1

    It can access the MAPI.dll needed to break open the .pst files that Outlook generates. At that point, zap all the mobx files over to a share that your Linux box can see, and Evolution will import them, attachments and all.

    I did this about three weeks ago and while it took about 30 mins from start to finish (three years worth of Outlook messages clocking in at about 3000 seperate emails), it worked like a charm.

    --
    Wu-Tang Name: Half-Cut Skeleton Get your own Wu-Na
  68. galeon 1.0 is not 'grown up', its full of bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    galeon 1.0 was released with known crashing bugs.
    they blame the shitty libraries from mozilla and gnome that
    they depend on. no doubt gnome and mozilla blame something
    else for their crashing. like 'lusers' not having the right
    date of CVS of gnome-whosit-whotsit (werent you hanging out on gimp.net #gnome 24/7 paying attention?
    its just like school, they are professors who cannot be bothered with those who dont show up for lecture).

    anyways, if you dont believe me, go to galeon.sf.net and read the mailing list archives.
    or go to bugillza.gnome.org and read all the crashing bugs on galeon.
    basically, the people in charge galeon dont really care
    if it crashes, and the users are so demoralized with
    asking for the crashes to stop, that its just going to get shitty.

    1. Re:galeon 1.0 is not 'grown up', its full of bugs by RossyB · · Score: 1

      Hell, i know this is flaim bait but it bugged me.

      Have a _good_ look at the mailing list and bugzilla, and notice that the requirements for 1.0 were "no crashing bugs". AFAIK there is 1 (ONE) known crasher in Galeon 1.0, and that is a Mozilla bug.

    2. Re:galeon 1.0 is not 'grown up', its full of bugs by RossyB · · Score: 1

      Dam, my spelling sucked there!

      s/flaim/flame/

    3. Re:galeon 1.0 is not 'grown up', its full of bugs by ksheff · · Score: 1

      What bugs are those? I've been running galeon 1.0 since it came out and haven't had any problems with it.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  69. Windows port? by Fucky+Badger · · Score: 0, Troll
    I'd love to try Evolution, but my computer isn't powerful enough to run Linux and GNOME.

    Some of us don't have 1GHz/256MB computers.

    1. Re:Windows port? by SLot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd love to try Evolution, but my computer isn't powerful enough to run Linux and GNOME.
      Some of us don't have 1GHz/256MB computers.

      Runs fine on my P166/128MB computer. For that matter, I've also got it running on a P233 with 48MB, but it's sloooow there.

    2. Re:Windows port? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Runs fine on a 266Mhz Pentium 2 with 96M of RAM here, with the rest of gnome.
      (of course you don't need to run the rest of gnome if you don't want to, it'll run on it's own with a few other libraries)

    3. Re:Windows port? by Fucky+Badger · · Score: 1
      Really? I tried Redhat 7.2 on a PII-333 with 128 MB, and the whole system... ground... to..... a...... halt.

      After listening to the hard drive grind constantly for 4 hours I said "screw it" and booted back into NT 4.0

    4. Re:Windows port? by SLot · · Score: 1

      Really? I tried Redhat 7.2 on a PII-333 with 128 MB, and the whole system... ground... to..... a...... halt.

      Hrm. I did have to do a text install on the P233, but had no problems other than that with RH 7.2. on either machine. The entire install process took about an hour for each machine. *shrug* I've been using evolution exclusively since about the .11 snapshots and have had no real problems with it either.

  70. Exchange connector - why not charge? by bourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see any problem with charging for the Exchange connector. Think of it as encouragement to go open source!

    Let's say you're a small company with an Exchange server. You pay for Exchange. You pay for CALs. Then someone installs Evolution and lets some of your people access Exchange without buying into the whole MS-$$-desktop licensing (I'm thinking support people, especially). You're still paying something, though, to make Evolution work with Exchange.

    Then someone says, "You know, Evolution would work just as well with Courier/Cyrus/whatever as an IMAP backend, and then we wouldn't have to pay for the Exchange server or the Exchange connectors.

    And there's your incentive to go open source.

    Also, this puts the onus of supporting Ximian on the corporations, who can afford it. If I want to use Evolution for myself to access my IMAP server, it's free. If I want to use it to get into Exchange at work, I get my boss to spring for a license. I'm happy, he's happy, Ximian stays in business.

    Caveat: Exchange still wins in the corporation until Evolution + Open Source server XYZ can provide shared calendaring and scheduling.

    1. Re:Exchange connector - why not charge? by praxim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, great, let's charge them to interface with the proprietary product. Unfortunately, there's a flaw in this logic: There's no incentive to move to OSS.
      Instead of people going, "Jeez, if I switch to OSS, I wouldn't even have to pay for this dumb Exchange connector," they're going to say, "Hmm, I have to pay for Outlook, I have to pay for Evolution (if I want it to function fully with my existing setup,) why bother introducing another OS and mail client into my network?" OSS zealots are very keen on the fact that MS wins on the basis of the end-user's perception of its products. If OSS and MS products are perceived in the same manner, there's no reason for someone to leave MS.
      All this does is enforce the idea that the user made the correct choice in choosing MS Exchange.
      Besides, I don't think Ximian would be too happy if everyone switched to plain old IMAP. They _want_ people to use their add-on, because otherwise they'd be cashless, which I sense is going to happen anyway.

  71. this is not really a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry moderators, the sad sad truth is that
    alot of these '1.0' programs have extremely
    unprofessional behaviors, like crashing alot.
    I dont care if 'microsoft crashes so its ok to crash'.
    Microsoft has alot of programs that dont crash.
    And alot of other companies do too. And really,
    what gives you the right to sit there lying to people,
    filling them up with expectations, like 'this program will run'?
    People used to say "linux doesnt crash" all the time. I'm sorry,
    you are in la-la land. I have no problems whatsoever
    locking up the X server, only to hear a bunch of
    whiny linux freaks tell me "its not really locked up, just
    ssh in from an ethernet connected box". i dont have an ethernet connected box.
    "shrug, works for me". now , i know most of the moderators
    do not understand why this is bad. they do not understand
    that hurting peoples feelings is wrong, that lying to people
    is wrong, that building up false hopes and then smashing them is wrong,
    or that treating peoples problems like they dont mean anything is wrong.
    but it is wrong, and it is the main,no, the only thing holding
    back open source software... the 'we dont need to
    write good programs that dont crash, we dont need
    to write documentation, we dont need to care about
    the users, we are open source emperors' attitude that
    floods the open source community, particularly the moderator
    community of slashdot. this is why i fled to kuro5hin,
    but goddamnit ,its down.

    1. Re:this is not really a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What 1.0 apps are you using that crash? And don't even think of saying "Netscape".

  72. this is not offtopic you dotcom moron. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and people wonder why the market crashed?
    its because of fucking idiots like these moderators
    who try to sweep every problem under the rug
    instead of paying attention to it.

  73. read past the first line by (startx) · · Score: 1

    yes, they claim they *will* have an echange plugin, but not until next year. this means vaporware for now. Not only that, but it will be released under a proprietary licence and cost nearly $70 for one, or $600 for a ten pack. I could buy MS Office XP Premium through my school for less than $70, so what's the advantage of evolution if you have to buy the exchange plugin at an exorbanant amount of money?

    1. Re:read past the first line by small_dick · · Score: 2

      so true, I can't help but wonder if the "proprietary" part is due to their licensing the protocol from MS?

      AFAIK, the fastest way to meet a MS lawyer is hacking or otherwise reverse engineering the exchange protocol.

      --


      Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
      See my user info for links.
    2. Re:read past the first line by praxim · · Score: 1

      No, the newsforge article explicitly states that this was not the reason.

  74. abiword = crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    idiot idiot idiot idiot.

    the only thing 'good' about it is the marketing hype.

  75. Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by WildHunter · · Score: 1

    One thing people are forgetting is that MS outlook clients are 100% FREE for all machines that connect to an Exchange Server. You don't have to pay for the client piece, it's all handled in the CAL's (which you have to purchase for every machine that connects to the Exchange server regaurdless of the platform you are connecting with.

    --
    Are you lonely? Hate having to make decisons? Meetings, the practical alternitive to work.
    1. Re:Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by bourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not forgetting - I'm discounting.

      Outlook runs on top of Windows, which is not free. It's quite expensive.

      Because of the way things are priced, companies usually end up buying Office, and therefore paying even more for Outlook.

      If I understood the offer correctly, Microsoft offered to put computers in a lot of schools, where 20% was the hardware cost, and the other 80% of the money was required to put software on them. If you think Outlook is "free," you aren't paying the bills.

    2. Re:Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      Outlook EXPRESS is free. Outlook(which comes with Microsoft Office) is not.

    3. Re:Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      No, you're not really correct. Outlook *and* Outlook Express are both free products. Even though Outlook comes with every copy of Microsoft Office, it's really just thrown into the bundle. You're not really paying for it. As it was pointed out already, MS makes their money on the client access licenses they require you to purchase to make connections to their Exchange server.

      Whenever you buy a copy of Exchange Server, they even throw in a set of install CDs of Outlook for Mac and PC. They hope you'll install lots of free copies of Outlook so you have to pay them big $'s for all those connection licenses.

    4. Re:Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      you can download IE6(or 5) and get outlook express. That makes it completely free. There is no way(legally) to get outlook without having to pay for Microsoft Office. Even if it's just *thrown in their* it still doesn't change the fact that you have to pay for Office, hence Outlook is not free.

    5. Re:Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by jjeff · · Score: 1

      No, you're not really correct. Outlook *and* Outlook Express are both free products. Even though Outlook comes with every copy of Microsoft Office, it's really just thrown into the bundle

      Well if this is true, why does Outlook require MS Office to be registered? It functions as just another component of Office - and AFAK it is not available for a free download. (free i think not.)

      --
      when everything is working perfectly.. BREAK SOMETHING before something else FUCKS up!
    6. Re:Because Outlook is FREE perhaps? by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      you can download IE6(or 5) and get outlook express. That makes it completely free. There is no way(legally) to get outlook without having to pay for Microsoft Office.

      Wrong.

      Outlook is included with Exchange Server and can be installed on any number of clients at no extra cost.

  76. .WAB addressbook files from outlook by ElvenKnight · · Score: 1

    This is more of a plea for help then anything, but I do have an intelligent point in the end about the whole thing and me very definitely wanting to go to something more standardized and NEVER use another frivkh,fgjd,h ...

    Outlook Express and Outlook seem to have different addressbook formats. I believe I started my address book in outlook 2000, but its possible an update of express crept on and defaulted itself or something or other, who knows.. for some reason I can't seem to open up my contacts of info that I have assembled during the last year.

    I can't tell you how disstressing that is.
    Its a .wab file of 180k in size, and the only
    thing I can come up with is that it might be
    corrupted.. I even searched MS's knowledgebase
    about the issue to discover that they basicly
    point you to a 3rd party in order to deal with
    .WAB files and suggested instead about exporting
    to comma delimited files, which honestly I should have known better to do.. but I figured whats wrong with the .WAB file? Surely a frkin multi-billion dollar company can make a decent save and secure contact program that one can rely on for ones data.. no?? Appearently NO.

    Eh. Anyway. So for anyone who hasn't figured it out yet, I would REALLY love to be able to open that file, and would shower anyone with praises for the answer. This is like the first time in a long time I'm dealing with potentially damaging data loss. :(

    But it raises an interesting point for discussion about all this crap happening in the first place too I think. :)

    Sincerely,
    -Matthew

    1. Re:.WAB addressbook files from outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few things that came to mind:

      http://www.connectedsw.com/AddressMagic.html

      http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?ur l= /workshop/wab/overviews/wabovw.asp
      I expect you found that one, though...

      http://www.emailman.com/conversion/

      http://www.interguru.com/MailInformation.htm

      By the way, when looking at these, and this: http://www.sharewareviking.com/emailapps7.htm
      it became incredibly obvious that ElcomSoft are the author of a LOT of shareware designed specifically to aid and abet spamming. Just thought people should know that.

      Microsoft do suggest that updating versions of their software may allow fixing of damaged .wab files but I don't believe them for a moment.

      Apparently outlook has some problems in file format due to introduction of Unicode. Whether any of this is at all relevant I wouldn't know. Still, good luck.

  77. Ximian & Evolution by ellem · · Score: 2

    Love jump up and down and be excited with you but I have to say these products are nothing to write home about.

    Ximian (on 6.2 500mhz 512MB ATI & 7.2 800mhz 512MB nVidia) is slower than molasses uphill in January. Totally unusable for day to day work. Looks nice slow as shit.

    Evolution is also slow and v1.0 has done little to improve that. Further it is a clunky way to do mail.

    I am open to suggestions to get it up to speed but my current experience with it is that it is too slow to be used.

    <OSX uber alles>

    ty, tyvm

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Ximian & Evolution by /dev/zero · · Score: 1

      I wonder what's wrong with your systems, then...

      I run Ximian and Evolution for day-to-day work on a number of systems, ranging from my 1GHz PIII workstation to an old Fujitsu Lifebook (P-166MMX). Very responsive on all systems -- certainly moreso than Winduhs on any of these platforms.

      Count me as very pleased with Ximian's work.

      Gordon.

      --

      He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
      -- J.R.R. Tolkien
    2. Re:Ximian & Evolution by ellem · · Score: 2

      Well I have totally cursed myself.

      I decided to look again on my 6.2 box and now the desktop just blinks at me and there are files all over the place and it yanks focus away from the terminal making trying to fix it very hard.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    3. Re:Ximian & Evolution by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      Interesting. Ximian on RH 7.1 on a 300 MHz 128 MB with a craptacious RIVA 128 is very usable after some tuning. Here's what I did:
      • Upgrade the kernel to a release with the new VM subsystem. This had a small, but noticeable improvement.
      • Type service --listall. Notice that I am running a mod-perl and mod-php enabled Apache, Postgresql, and Zope on a desktop box. Swear at self for a while, then turn off unneeded crap.
      • Reduce my desktop to one virtual desktop with one workspace.
      • Notice that medusa is eating a major portion of my CPU time. Upgrade medusa, problem is gone. I can't tell if I even need this service. It was part of nautilus at one point, but rpm -q --whatrequires medusa comes up empty.

      I've lost a bit of functionality, but the system is at least as useable as it is with Windows 9x on it. I use it as my main e-mail and web surfing machine, saving the Athlon for more mission critical stuff like Diablo II and Civ3.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    4. Re:Ximian & Evolution by iomud · · Score: 2
      Ximian (on 6.2 500mhz 512MB ATI & 7.2 800mhz 512MB nVidia) is slower than molasses uphill in January.

      It seems to run fine for me on a 500Mhz p3 384M it runs fine over xwin32 even, so as far as I'm concerned that's nonsense. Evolution it is an outlook clone, there's no mistaking it if you don't like outlook you probably wont like evolution. If you dont like it don't use it but don't sell it short just because you dont like it, because obviously lots of other people do.

    5. Re:Ximian & Evolution by ellem · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I will have a go at that.

      However I gen'lly run 8 desktops (I could probably go down to 6) I wonder is that's an issue.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
  78. In other news,... by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...the state of Georgia announced that its public schools would be instructed to block downloads of Evolution 1.0 until the usual warning message was added:
    • Evolution is only a theory, and cannot be verified, since no humans were present to witness it.

    Close on the heels of this development, Microsoft announced that its software would be fully in compliance with all laws concerning munitions exports and creationism.

    1. Re:In other news,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course Microsoft believes in creationism.

      Every MicroSerf knows that Bill Gates is God.

      (But every Linux zeolot knows, he's "the other guy")

      ;-)

  79. Re:Not bad so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm personally working on translating Shakespears entire works to include smillies and emoticons, to make them more suitable and understandable for the modern readership. A small excert:

    "Alas, poor Yoric :("

  80. Filter suggestion! by Fellgus · · Score: 0, Troll

    When will there be a filter on slashdot to weed out all news from the trying-to-make-linux-look-like-windows dept.? For me, and for a lot of the people I study and work with, OutLook was never a serious alternative to the MUAs we use (such as Pine, VM, Gnus etc). What is the "news for nerds" in a OutLook-a-like MUA?. It's not stuff that matters :(

    --

    -larsch

    1. Re:Filter suggestion! by luge · · Score: 1

      You should give evo a shot. Many of my die-hard old-school BOFH mutt and GNUS loving friends have tried it and switched. Evo is not just 'trying to look like windows'- it's got new and powerful functionality (like vfolders) that are extremely useful for 1337 power users like yourself, and make the switch worthwhile. Open your mind, just a bit... you never know what might come in.

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  81. Ximian Connector Server or Client Side? by larsl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The description of this Connector makes it look like it might live on the server side.

    Does exchange itself have a plugin architecture? When I used to be responsible for the care and feeding of Outlook clients the saddest thing was watching the parasitic developers that developed Outlook add-ons try to keep up with changes in Outlook. These, mind you, were Microsoft's friends, at least for as long as it takes for Microsoft to implement all the extra features of fax clients and remote access accelerators into Outlook proper. If Ximian intends to keep up with Microsoft on Microsoft's OS and groupware server, I'd reckon they're in for a wild ride.

    Perhaps this connector will be a middleware Linux server translating between the Evo clients and the Exchange server. OK, now you're only trying to keep up with Exchange. Just remember to add the cost of a reasonably powered Linux box to the equation. Since this connector is proprietary, be prepared to get stuck with binaries that may not work with subsequent releases of the distro(s) they support. How happy would you be to admin a Redhat 5 box right now?

    If this thing is client side, then it is surely an abomination.

    "Things in the real world cost real money, son." Blah-blah-blah, this Ximian-Connector business still smells like bait-and-switch.

    I hear chants of "It's not done 'til Lotus don't run" echoing in the distance.

    1. Re:Ximian Connector Server or Client Side? by luge · · Score: 1

      It's a client-side plugin; it makes exchange 'just another source' like IMAP or POP. I don't understand why that makes it an abomination.

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  82. i cant believe this is +2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should moderate this troll down,
    like all the other linux bashers!
    go back to windows if you dont like it!
    you luser!

    (note: this character was created from actual events on irc.)

  83. Outlook Competition? by tallahasseepenguin · · Score: 1

    > Now Outlook can start facing some serious competition, although there's still a long way to go.

    Not likley .. Outlook works on PC's Loaded with Windows ..
    This is only going to work on PC's Loaded with Linux Running XIMIAN/GNOME .. what about the KDE users? Sorry .. for there to be true competition to the M$ advantage a standard desktop for Linux is going to have to emerge .. right now the camp is too factioned.

    1. Re:Outlook Competition? by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is only going to work on PC's Loaded with Linux Running XIMIAN/GNOME

      Not true; you only need the required libraries installed in order to run evolution, you don't need gnome to be running. You can quite happily run it on a machine running KDE, or WindowMaker, twm, etc. You may well lose some of the default integration stuff, but that should be fixed just by changing file type associations to point at your chosen apps.

      Even if you install Gnome in its entirity, you'll only blow a hundred megs of disk space or so, and even I can afford that ;-) (Current storage capacity is 2.5 gigs; I desperately need a new hard drive...)

      Cheers,

      Tim

    2. Re:Outlook Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except that I don't want to fill my hd with crap like gnome. How about a port of Evolution to Qt/KDE? Maybe they can make Evolution interface indepedent like licq?

      Well, actually, I don't mind installing GNOME, but I want Evolution to look like the rest of my desktop. Until that happens, I'm happily using kmail (I have small email requirements, just pop3,filtering, and gpg).

    3. Re:Outlook Competition? by SETY · · Score: 1

      required is the key word.
      Redhat 7.1 system...........
      [root@fool /root]# rpm -Uvh evolution-1.0-ximian.3.i386.rpm
      error: failed dependencies:
      bonobo >= 1.0.14 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgtkhtml20 >= 0.16.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      gtkhtml >= 0.16.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgal18 >= 0.18.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      bonobo-conf >= 0.14 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libnss3 >= 0.9.5 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      oaf >= 0.6.7 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobo-print.so.2 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobo.so.2 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobo_conf.so.0 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libbonobox.so.2 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgal.so.18 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgconf-1.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgconf-gtk-1.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgnomeprint.so.15 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgnomevfs.so.0 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgtkhtml.so.20 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libnss3.so is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      liboaf.so.0 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libsmime3.so is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libssl3.so is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgpilotd.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgpilotdcm.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libgpilotdconduit.so.1 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3
      libpisock.so.4 is needed by evolution-1.0-ximian.3

    4. Re:Outlook Competition? by damiam · · Score: 2

      apt-get install evolution

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Outlook Competition? by SETY · · Score: 1

      yes, the servers I admin at work run debian. We use redhat for other things.....

  84. upgrading and modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modem users in remote places are pretty much forced to upgrade.
    ignoring the needs of these people is, to quote Ed Wood,

    "STUPID STUPID STUPID."

    1. Re:upgrading and modems by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 2

      Guess I'll respond to the flamebait :)

      I disagree. Modem users are not forced to do anything, including using the "upgrade" option of a distribution. They should probably whip out their credit card and pony up the dough to buy a boxed set online. In the U.S., using a modem is saving you $20-$40/month versus a broadband connection anyway, making the $29.95 price of a boxed set of Ximian Gnome, or $59.95 for RedHat 7.2 a trivial price to pay for not having to download hundreds of megabytes of data.

      I'm not saying distro makers should abandon the "upgrade" option; I'm saying I have had bad experiences with attempting to "upgrade", versus backing up critical data and installing from scratch. Even Richard Stallman got his start with GNU Emacs selling tapes of Emacs for $150 a pop because people didn't have the pipes to download it!

      Back to the topic of this thread, however: Version-specificness (is that a word?) of Ximian is annoying, and I don't envy the modem user unwilling to purchase the boxed set their download of 200-300Mbytes after an upgrade. However, even minor revision numbers of the same distribution often break binary compatability. Is there a better way to do it than Ximian provides?

  85. as opposed to all those non-OSS software companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, doing so great. no layoffs there!

  86. Yup it works... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    i got 0.99 up and running on Slack 8, using the Linuxmafia Packages. It was no problem...but don't forget to download the nss-package too like i did. ;-)
    I think evolution really is a nice mailclient and organizer but i couldn't get my palm to sync with it. But what would be life without challenge?

    Lispy

  87. well i ran MS Word on a 486/33 w 8MB RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    show me a linux word processor (hell show me an
    X server) that can do that.

    no, wait, dont show me, because you will probably
    just lie or stupidly suggest abiword or koffice.
    no, moron. those do not work. i spent years in college
    living with shit ass old hardware like 486 with no memory, and there is absolutely
    nothing out there that is acceptable. i got by with abiword, when it wasnt
    crashing, screwing up my fonts, displaying text wrong,
    etc etc etc. but i preferred to work with 'clarisworks' on the macintoshes
    in the computer lab. however, lots of people can use
    word just fine on this old stuff. it just shows
    how stupid and out-of-touch linux people are with reality.
    get a motherfucking grip you smelly pathetic
    upper class twits.

  88. Re:serious competition for outlook?did anybodytry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think with the help of cygwin it should be able to be done. AFAIK there is also a w32 port of GTK?

    I think Attacking Outlook on his home place is a real chalange and worth wile to go.
    Allso it allows you the soft toe - dipping, like using StarOffice/w32 before switching the whole machine no *nix+X11.

  89. have any backups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    copy the backup .wab file onto some place and see if you can look at it.

  90. Exchange users will pay more... by NetJunkie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Using Evolution with Exchange is going to cost a company more than using Outlook. When deploying Exchange you buy a server license, either standard or enterprise, and then you buy client licenses for each user. Along with that license you also get an Outlook license.

    If we wanted to move to Evolution we'd still have to pay the same amount, and then have to pay for the Exchange connector on top of it. The price just went up $70/user to move to Evolution. I can't seem to locate my quote for our Exchange migration here, but a quick check shows a 5 user client access pack for Exchange is about $350...so the price per user just doubled.

    I'll pay it... I've been waiting for this since Evolution was first announced. Every LinuxWorld I ask them about Exchange support so it's nice to see it coming soon. But, it will be harder for someone else to do a mass migration.

    Something to consider.... I hope it works for them. I see Ximian as a company that needs to stick around for the Linux desktop to really take off.

    1. Re:Exchange users will pay more... by Quikah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually I think they would pay about the same. You have to subtract the client OS license since they will be running Linux instead of Windows. Then once you do that you subtract the Office license since you will be using OpenOffice or StarOffice 6.

      Regardless right now I think they are targetting developers who have a Linux box for development and then a windows box for their administrative stuff (email, office, etc.) They are enabling the devleoper to get rid of the Windows box. Should this prove successful (and OpenOffice/Staroffice 6 actually works well) I think they will start to target the general business user.

      --
      Q.
    2. Re:Exchange users will pay more... by brotherofstlopus · · Score: 1

      And if Oracle's drop-in works... Not saying Redwood Shores is better than Redmond.

    3. Re:Exchange users will pay more... by epukinsk · · Score: 1

      $350 for five users is $70/user ... the same as Evolution.

      Plus, doesn't Outlook itself cost something? Evolution comes with Ximan GNOME Desktop, which from their web site appears like you can buy one copy for $50 and then install on as many desktops as you want... same with RH, which is like $180.

      So for 5 users, that's about $600. Can you get five windows licenses, five outlook license and your 5 user client access pack for Exchange for that much?

      Maybe I'm misunderstanding where the higher cost is in Evolution.

      -Erik

    4. Re:Exchange users will pay more... by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      You have to buy a client license for the user if they use Evolution or Outlook...so that's $70. Then, you have to pay for the Evolution connector, which is another $70/user. You can't install the connector on every machine for just $70.

      No, you do not have to pay for Outlook. It comes as part of the client license for Exchange (the first $70/user).

  91. Vice versa, how to set up ldap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how do I set up slapd as it comes with debian to make it interact with Evolution? I've read all those readme's I've found, but nothing worx...

  92. other ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how important is the years worth of contacts?
    a couple hundred? couple thousand? im sure
    some 'third party' could help you out, i mean
    they have people who recover floppy disks from
    fires etc, surely there is someone who can deal
    with broken .WAB files for a couple hundred bucks.

  93. how would they feel if... by matusa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the community created an open source plug-in that
    was analogous to connector?

    As a side note, I think they've found a great balance between being open source and still selling code. Most of the mass of the app is free, and that rules.

  94. aparently you can't read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    otherwise your would know that for those companies reuqire full connectivity, they can just buy Ximian's fullo exchange support plugin.

  95. Mod this up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh dear Gnusus, where are all my mod points when I need them. This was the best reply so far. CLI != GUI, end users != admins. While I still think open interfaces that allow apps (small and large) to interact seamlessly are THE solution -- everyone can use kind of tools they like; either monolithic or small-tools -- it's a mistake to assume that 'small is better' is always true for everyone.

    Besides, linux kernel is monolithic, perl is anything but a small specialized tool... There's no One True Unix way to begin with. The idea of piping small simple tools together is a neat one, but it's NOT all encompassing religion.

  96. no, it's not out of sync. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the anonymous servers take up to 24 hours to mirror from the locked down servers as they always have... do you have ANY idea how much data is in the gnome CVS tree?

  97. can't even write email! by cFour · · Score: 1

    I get, "Could not create composer window: unable to activate HTML editor component." Version 1.0 of Evo shouldn't have this problem, it's one of the core features.

    Maybe it's not Evolution, maybe it was Red Carpet (I do have the latest Red Carpet) not installing something. Maybe it's an isolated case, probably not. But, it still doesn't look good on Ximian's part.

    Someone may reply to this saying, "It's simple you damn newbie, just blah blah blah", but 1.0 should work with no tweaking involved. I mean, this type of software is for simplicity; to make newer people comfortable in Linux, right? They are going to have less of an idea on how to fix it, and when they hit a wall like this will, 99% of the time, reboot and go back to windows. They don't want to hear it. For me, i'm sticking with what works ... pine is great.

  98. Does Evolution deserve this much attention? by exa · · Score: 1

    When there's KMail and Aethera who fucks Ximian?

    --
    --exa--
  99. People saying 'we don't need this' need to THINK by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    Evolution is not for the die-hard linux user who's been using linux for years and thinks X is for wussies.

    Evolution, and Ximian Desktop for that matter are for those individuals out there that make up, oh, probably 65% to 75% of the computer user market. You know, the people you love to bash on.

    Computers aren't just a hobbiest or an uber-Geek domain. There are accounting, sales, marketing departments out there that require something butt simple. If you give them somethink like Pine they will Whine forever because Outlook was so much better. If you give them Evolution, they have less to whine about because evolution is a lot like Outlook.

    It's an important announcement for the rest of the world that manages large amounts of NT/2K Server Farms to support Exchange, IIS and other things and needs a business case to move. things like this help make that business case.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  100. Does anyone else see the irony.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..Outlook. Competition. Evolution?

    I thought things got better with evolution. :)

    Though I expect Evolution will do well in Kansas.

    LookOut! Evolution!

    *cough* *runs off and hides from the evil moderators*

  101. I hate to say it but!! by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Man I usually tolerate differing opinions very well but you my freind are a idiot. XML-RPC is about a PLATFORM NEUTRAL rpc calling method. It has nothing whatsover to do with a firewall. When you are sitting at your desk with your IE browser and hit that submit button you are doing nothing more than xml-rpc does, so how is that circumventing a firewall?? (gawd I hate users)

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:I hate to say it but!! by Cally · · Score: 2

      he called me a `user' !!!! he called me a `user' !?!?!?!
      (Cally reaches for the etherkiller...)

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  102. Not So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look more closely you will see that evolution is based on top of a bunch of Gnome corba services. These services can be used by other front end applications.

    Evolution is about as unixy as a guied desktop app can get.

  103. personaly by G00F · · Score: 1

    I would like to see more open source software out there. Not to get it free. But so I(or others) can change things that the parent company wont. It also eases my mind that there are no inteninal back holes or spyware type code. Companies think to much about opensource == free. But thats not inportant

    Open source isn't about free. Its about software freedom.

    Sell the compiled/packaged software, but allow free downloads of the full and complete source.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
  104. Evolution rocks! by ACK!! · · Score: 2

    The Exchange connector costs money? So, what? As long as it keeps this company a float.

    I use Ximian Gnome and Evolution as my email client exclusively and have been VERY impressed. Sure, it is fluff to get my Slashdot headlines through the app but I love the integration of my PIM and email functionality. It is solid and I have yet to hit many of the bugs other people have seen (maybe RedCarpet is good for something besides taking up desktop space).

    The app performs well and looks good. Now, if they could just get Gnome itself to speed up then I would be a happy camper. I am about this far from going back to WindowMaker because Kde and Gnome feel so slow next to Wmaker on a quick Celeron running SuSE 7.2.

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
  105. Integration would make it groupware... by alexborges · · Score: 0

    There was some discussion about this on the devel list phpgroupware on which I normaly troll.

    They said Miguel was not interested server-side-wise in an integration with anything else but IMAP. This is not only shortsided but dangerous since OpenOffice.Org has started making a scheduller and they are much more friendlyer towards phpgroupware.

    Of course, developing a plugin for evolution is not that hard. Its real good code, it has sync plugins already so building some xml-rpc layer on a plugin for synching with phpgw (they both already support vcards and ldap and a bunch of stuff) so that who cares if miguel wont do it, you can do it yourself.

    I think they are both great tools but I really would like to see evoltion become a phpgroupware client. It would leverage them both towards the sky since outlook will be integrateable -to some degree- with phpgrouwpare itself (since it will be an xml-rpc/SOAP server) and this would make more eyes turning their way. I think phpgw will be the next standard for groupware computing allover the world.

    Now about Dominos (isnt that a pizza company?), lets stop beating a dead horse, it sucks, it stinks, it so ugly and badly designed and prop.

    It will give you an aneurism trying to programm for it, its the worst thing that ever happened to computers next to windows 1.0. I would like to shoot their designers in all three tentacles and to reap all their eight eyeballs out.

    So much for "stop" beating it....sigh...

    Well there...thats my two bits....

    Alex

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Integration would make it groupware... by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

      They said Miguel was not interested server-side-wise in an integration with anything else but IMAP.

      Yes, me and seek3r had a "meeting" with him at the O'Reilly conf this summer. For some odd reason, he is insainly gung-ho over IMAP. Which is fine, I don't care about the datastore. As long as theres an XML-RPC intreface to it.

      This is not only shortsided but dangerous since OpenOffice.Org has started making a scheduller and they are much more friendlyer towards phpgroupware.

      Seek3r has been talking to them quite a bit about it. Hopefully, things will come about with them. They are kinda dragging there feet with getting something going. I really don't like the way there development works. I am not going to comment on it here, but its why seek3r is working with them and I am not ... :)

      Of course, developing a plugin for evolution is not that hard. Its real good code, it has sync plugins already so building some xml-rpc layer on a plugin for synching with phpgw (they both already support vcards and ldap and a bunch of stuff) so that who cares if miguel wont do it, you can do it yourself.

      You wanna do it ? :)

      I think they are both great tools but I really would like to see evoltion become a phpgroupware client. It would leverage them both towards the sky since outlook will be integrateable -to some degree- with phpgrouwpare itself (since it will be an xml-rpc/SOAP server) and this would make more eyes turning their way.

      I agree 110%. There are a slew of people out there that think the same, just for some reason, there are some that are blind to the concept.

      I think phpgw will be the next standard for groupware computing allover the world.

      hehe :)

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    2. Re:Integration would make it groupware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Don't listen to Miguel. He does Mono. He is not involved in leading the Evolution project, and apparently isn't even paying much attention to what's happening right now with it if you're quoting him accurately.

      2) Evolution will never use IMAP for anything but mail, because IMAP isn't designed for anything but mail. If you try to store contacts and appointments in IMAP folders you lose the ability to search, etc.

      3) Evolution was designed from the beginning to have pluggable backends. It would be totally possible to write a phpgroupware backend.

      The reason the Evolution team isn't adding a backend for phpGroupware is that absolutely no one except for the phpGroupware hackers have requested it. We have a ton of things we want to get done, and we are not going to spend our time hacking on support for a server that none of our users appear to care much about.

      And if someone else wants to do it, you don't even need to fork evolution! You could write your own backend to talk to your server without needing to change any of the main evolution code.

  106. Re: your signature by Refrag · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess you can go back to using a Mac if you want people to stop laughing at you. Mac OS X has a command prompt.

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  107. See mbx2mbox or ol2mbox by cduffy · · Score: 2

    For older versions of Outlook:
    http://mbx2mbox.sourceforge.net/

    For newer versions:
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/ol2mbox/

    For Outlook Express 4 or 5:
    http://www.gpl.no/liboe/

    The links on the mbx2mbox page are quite useful -- that's where I picked up the others.

  108. Lexmark == Drug Dealers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You expect us to believe you work for Lexmark? Ha! No, you don't! Nobody works for Lexmark. Lexmark is just a shell organization used by the Russian mafia to traffic in durgs, money, and stolen goods.

    I bought a Lexmark T522 Series printer and the optional ImageQuick a while ago and not only didn't it work with Linux, when I opened it up it was full of big rocks of crack cocaine!. Ha ha Lexmark, BUSTED !

    So I got addicted to crack and now my supply's running low and refils on crack cost a hell of a lot more than toner refils. I called "Lexmark" to have a salesman contact me and he showed up in a gold Lexus with mega-bass and tinted windows so I took off. Now Lexmark's threatening to kill my dog and I"m in the witness protection program.

    Thanks a lot, mafia boy, thanks a lot!

  109. How about s version for Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No I am not kidding. I have to use windows at my office for now. If I could get this working in windows and Linux then I can move some people at my office off of Windows. I am already getting people off of MS Office on to Star office. I re wrote our Phone messageing system in Java so that would run on Linux. A windows version would be a big help.
    Tech "We should move our front desk people to Linux."
    Boss "Wouldn't that cause problems?"
    Tech "Not at all all the programs that they need already run under Linux."
    Boss "Okay lets give it a try."

  110. IBM is there by fm6 · · Score: 2
    However, what should be remembered is that Notes is a database and workflow application. It is not an Emailer or even a PIM.
    Actually, Notes is a messaging app and that's all it is. Grew out of the messaging system on Control Data's Plato system. There's no intrinsic workflow features and it lacks most features (types, integrity, query optimization) that would qualify it as a real database management system.

    But Notes is scriptable and has nice repository features (UID-based replication; hierarchical storage, etc.) and has very nice access management. So workflow is an obvious application. But so are other apps that involve sharing masses of text. Which is why there's now support for HTTP, POP, IMAP, LDAP, and god knows what else.

    So of course IBM has ported Notes to Linux. But not the whole thing. The Notes server, which has become a separate product known as Domino, is available on Linux and every other platform IBM is into. IBM used to push the Notes client as a general-purpose message app, but it's so weird and kludgy that it really has not hope of a following except among Notes true believers.

    The thing that bothers me about Notes is that it's sold as a workflow solution. What it really is is a platform on which workflow solutions can be built -- with a lot of development and integration effort!

  111. Grab gtkhtml package by Totally_Tux · · Score: 1

    Hiya,

    I had exactly the same problem as you for Evolution RC 1 and 2. Took me a while to nut it out, so I'll save you the effort. Try this:

    1. Download the gtkhtml-1.0.0 package
    2. Install it

    (just to make sure)
    3. ldconfig
    4. oaf-slay
    5. killev

    6. restart evolution.

    That took me a month of bumming around to figure out but I finally found that evolution was missing a package dependency. GTKHtml is a bonobo component that communicates with oaf, without this package Evolution hasn't got an application to create a default compose email.

    I mailed the Evolution maling list about my problem but it seems no one else has had that particular problem -- thought perhaps I corrupted the RPM database with a few too many --nodeps.

    Cheers,
    Joseph Tan

    1. Re:Grab gtkhtml package by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problem, and followed your directions. Unfortunately, it still doesn't work.

      Why the hell can't they build this so it works? If I can view email, which uses the GTKHtml widget I presume... why can't I send it? What packages am I missing? Why can't it just install properly, without my having to jump through about 30 package dependencies.

      Keep in mind, my company has about a dozen people who would kill for this... we're unix developers, and the rest of the company uses outlook. We'd love to get this working and we'd love to pay for the outlook conduit.

      So if someone could tell me what I'm missing, I'd love it. Is it some obscure setting somewhere?

      Grumble. Mod me up!

    2. Re:Grab gtkhtml package by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its mostly oaf & bonobo problems causing this, but sometimes some dependencies. Which is unfortunately, not our code.

      gtkhtml for viewing mail is linked directly into the application, thats why it just works.

      For composing, it uses several components, some of which need to be activated through oaf.

      So: make sure you have uptodate, oaf, orbit, bonobo, and gtkhtml.

      run oaf-slay
      retry running evolution

      Also try running gnome-gtkhtml-editor manually and see if it spits any errors.

    3. Re:Grab gtkhtml package by sodergren · · Score: 1

      I've had this problem for a while with many versions of Evolution when pulled via Red Carpet.
      Problem seems to be with the gnome-gtkhtml-editor
      binary.

      rpm -q -f /usr/bin/gnome-gtkhtml-editor showed that
      there were TWO packages installed that provided this
      binary:
      gtkhtml-0.15.0-ximian.2.i586.rpm
      libgtkhtml9-0.9.2-ximian.5.i586.rpm

      Solution: Remove both of the above packages:
      rpm -e gtkhtml-0.15.0
      rpm -e libgtkhtml9-0.9.2

      Now reinstall 0.15.0 from Red Carpet's package
      cache:

      rpm -Uvh /var/cache/redcarpet/packages/libgtkhtml9-0.9.2-xi mian.5.i586.rpm

      Message composition now works.

      BTW, the above box runs Mandrake 8.0; I'm not sure
      if the above discrepancy is due to many previous
      versions of Evolution being installed or due to
      broken/duplicate dependancies for Mdk 8.0...

  112. are they eating their own dogfood by Foaf · · Score: 2

    how many ximianers (ites?) are using Evo? Are they being forced to eat their own dogfood or do they still use pine or elm or mutt or whatever?

    1. Re:are they eating their own dogfood by luge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Basically everyone here (with one stubborn standout; she knows who she is :) has been dogfooding evo since July. That includes Nat, with his >1G mail stores, and a large number of folks whose email load tops 1K messages a day.

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  113. Minor math problem. by Chagrin · · Score: 2

    The Ximian Connector is priced at $69 ($599 for 10 pack, $1499 for 25 pack) and comes with 90 days of web-based installation support.

    Note that the 10 pack ($59.90 per license) is cheaper than the 25 pack ($59.96 per license).

    --

    I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  114. Are you really awake? by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    Until it fully supports Exchange Server, it'll never be a serious competitor to Outlook.

    I know, but they had to disable the automatic viral scripting features. For some reason, a few of the Outlook users think that's a bug, and not a feature.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  115. Way overpriced by g8oz · · Score: 1

    $69 for Ximian Connector is totally unreasonable and will slow adoption of Evolution and Linux in the business world.

  116. Notes & Exchange by north.coaster · · Score: 1

    Considering that Notes/Domino has about 45% of the Groupware market (it's roughly tied with Exchange) then integration with Lotus would be a good idea. The problem, of couse, is that Notes servers and Domino servers are not 100% compatible (and there is still a sizable population old Notes servers still in use), so to do it right they would have to do some extra work to support both platforms. /Don

  117. Ximian FTP Servers are Down, Any Mirrors by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 1

    Something is seriously wrong with the Ximian FTP Servers. It causes NcFTP to SEGFAULT!! No other FTP client can connect either. Grumble stupid slashdot effect grumble.

    --
    Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
  118. How to Win the Desktop Market by north.coaster · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, any corporation that starts reformating hard drives and installing Linux on their office workers' PCs would be crazy -- the short term productivity hit while everyone learned the new system would be enormous! This is independent of whether or not there's a friendly Groupware or PIM app available for Linux.

    A better solution for corporations would be to start small, and begin by migrating individual desktop applications while keeping the Windows platform. Once all of the desktop apps were switched (in a couple years) then they could switch the OS.

    So the goal of creating a usable Linux desktop is noble, but if this is done without thinking about how corporations would actually do the migration, then Linux will never take over the corporate desktop.

    /Don

  119. Galeon is definitely 'grown up' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using it since the first version. And I haven't experienced ANY CRASHES since version 0.9!!
    Everything is rock solid, it renders all webpages I visit just fine.
    I especially enjoy cool features such as preventing popups, tabbed browsing, link toolbars, smart bookmarks, etc.
    Not even the loved-by-all Internet Explorer can compete with Galeon feature-wise.
    If you don't call that grown up, then you're either trolling or have a VERY badly configured system.

    1. Re:Galeon is definitely 'grown up' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try web pages with those stupid shockwave ads on them.. They lock up Galeon for me very frequently. They used to hang Mozilla for me too until 0.9.6. But Galeon still dies...

      I really like the brower, but it's still not stable enough.

  120. Much too sane & reasonable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See here young man, this is no place for those sorts of comments! Please try to get into the spirit of Slashdot. There is only one right answer to any problem! All other options are the spawn of Satan. Please try to remember this.

  121. Open Source with proprietary extensions. by Merlin_ · · Score: 1

    I would have love to have been beside RMS to see him fall flat on his ass when he read the news... (he then quickly got up and his head spun completely around a couple of times and he started speaking in tongues... :-0 )

    --

    Remembering your name in the morning is already a good start...
  122. As has already been said by two posters... by luge · · Score: 5, Informative

    I repeat it since I have points and the mods aren't bothering to read at 0 today:
    The plugin runs as a component, not a library, so the communication is via a CORBA interface. Since no linking occurs (merely CORBA communication) there is no GPL violation, nor any need to re-license.

    --

    IAAL,BIANLY

  123. Non-latin support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are using non-latin alphabet, I will probaly have to wail till 1.2:

    http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11370

    You know, American market is where most their ivestors are, so you have to wait - this is not priority for them.

  124. Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is stone-age. You should try MacOSX -- it has the power of unix but with a nice useable interface and good applications.

  125. Forget Exchange -- does it interoperate with Pine? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2

    I've been watching Evolution with interest, but not enough to install the development versions. Now that it has a stable, release version (no doubt for certain values of stable), I want to give it a spin. However, one thing I don't seem to be able to find on Ximian's site is whether Evolution works with the standard mbox format so I can continue to use Pine as well. Because it's often necessary for me to ssh into my desktop box to access mail from machines that don't have X installed, I must use Pine (or Mutt), whereas it would just be an optional perk for me to have a GUI mail client.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  126. Re:Forget Exchange -- does it interoperate with Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends on how you use pine.

    If you use maildir, you can just point evolution at your maildir tree. End of story. I recommend using that.

    If you use the 'standard mbox spool', of /var/*/mail/username as your inbox, you can specify 'standard mbox spool file', and point it there.

    Either of those ways will not move the mail from where it is. You can also use the standard mbox spool to point to additional folders in ~/mail, although it looks ugly in the display at the moment.

    Or use imap (i would suggest this too).

    Or import all your mail into evolution, and point pine to it manually (not ideal).

  127. Not so, price is lower by alexborges · · Score: 0

    You dont make any sense, the license for a client outlook is more expensive than the connector and evolution is free of license cost.... This makes them even in cost which is good, considering its far much better and less insecure than outlook.

    Leaving that alone, there are plenty niches where only the mail client is needed where you could get off all of windows as client and just have the exchange server on a server NT box. Now thats a lot of savings.

    Another niche are Linux/UNIX sysadmins that have to use exchange and windows just because of a corp. decition to use it. Now they can throw away those windows machines and use evolution on their (horrible, CDE powered) solaris box.

    To those trying to (not you), dont flame ximian for making a propietary extension to evolution, they have to eat and they will do it the right way, theyll charge to people stupid enough to use exchange in the first place, they aint charging me!

    Alex

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:Not so, price is lower by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

      No matter which mail client you use, you have to pay $70/user for an Exchange Client Access License. That license also lets you use Outlook.

      So..to put a user on Exchange I must buy one of those. If I want to use Evolution I then have to pay them $70 for their connector. That's a grand total of $140/user to put on Exchange and have them use Ximian. If they used Outlook they would only spend $70/user for the CAL.

      I'm not factoring in the OS cost in to this..sure, Linux is free and Windows isn't. I'm just talking mail clients and access.

    2. Re:Not so, price is lower by alexborges · · Score: 0

      Mhm....you are absolutely right, I didnt know the CAL also covered the Outlook license....

      I stand corrected...

      Alex

      --
      NO SIG
    3. Re:Not so, price is lower by nathanh · · Score: 2
      You dont make any sense, the license for a client outlook is more expensive than the connector and evolution is free of license cost.... This makes them even in cost which is good, considering its far much better and less insecure than outlook.

      You need the Client Access License (CAL) even if you use Evolution instead of Outlook. Microsoft charges you once for the server software and a second time for every client that connects to that server. You still need to pay both times even if your e-mail client is "free".

      So for 5 users using Outlook and Exchange you pay $1000s for Exchange then $350 for CALs. If you change this over to Evolution then you STILL need to pay $1000s for Exchange then $350 for CALs, but now you ALSO need to pay $350 to Ximian for the Lucy Connector.

      Microsoft effectively gives Outlook away for no-cost because you MUST pay for the CALs whether you use Outlook or not.

  128. Pricing comparision by skrowl · · Score: 1

    Just for those who care:
    Ximian Evolution that works with Exchange 2000 - $69
    Full retail boxes Outlook 2002 (XP) - $109

    --

    Prevent linux based DDOS's!
    http://linux.denialofservice.org/
  129. Open Source (or cheaper) connector?? Exchange 5.5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm all for them making money, but in order to "prove" to my bosses that an open-source OS/mail solution is powerful, interoperable, and more cost-effective, I think I'm going to need a cheaper Exchange connector (US$69???).

    Also, although I'm probably in the minority, we're still running exchange 5.5. Obviously, Exchange 2000 is different and based on past observations there's a good chance the API is different in subtle yet important ways, so I doubt a connector for 2000 will work with 5.5.

    I haven't really been looking, are there other Exchange connector projects on the go??

    Glenn

  130. Sick of these jokes... by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    (Evolution does not yet emulate all the Outlook viruses, of course, nor does it integrate with Exchange Server.)"

    I wish there was a Linux client to attach to an Exchange Server (I mean can't we all just get along), that would allow me to go to a linux desktop at work, instead of dual booting to 2000.

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
  131. Standard business desktop by horza · · Score: 2

    Putting my personal preferences aside, I think Evolution 1.0 + Exchange plugin is excellent news for pushing Linux on the corporate desktop. I've just installed Mandrake and it's just as easy to install as XP (which I did same day on another machine). The two can also be made to look identical. With an Outlook clone the jigsaw is more complete ($69 is nothing compared to OS and Exchange licenses). Add a decent Word import/export filter to Abiword, which appears identical to Word in use to me, and you then have a drop-in replacement for M$ in the workplace.

    Also, I think a lot of techies will be able to swing the $69 by claiming they often do work from home on their Linux box.

    On the note of installing Linux, why do none of them offer an automatic basic install? I normally want to install my OS and get that the way I want it before I start installing any applications I need. So why force me to choose packages when installing? Can we please have an option: do you want to install applications now? And if the answer is no just get on and install the basic desktop (plus browser). This goes for all distro; Mandrake, Red Hat, etc.

    Phillip.

  132. No OpenSSL Support in 1.0 by Ax0n · · Score: 1

    From the Evolution ChangeLog: 2001-11-21 Jeffrey Stedfast
    * README: Updated. Don't say that the user needs to copy their mozilla database files into ~/evolution, since Evolution now builds it's own default database files if they don't exist and also remove instructions for building with OpenSSL.

    Evolution no longer supports S/IMAP, S/POP, S/SMTP using OpenSSL, you MUST have nss from mozilla installed to get SSL support for mail transfers.

    After the last few release canidates having issues with SSL, I was sincerely hoping that 1.0 would work. I was disheartened to find OpenSSL support completely removed.

    I am unable to find a reason for this switch, as both nss and openssl support had been implemented in the past I fail to see why they would remove support for it.

    --
    -- Morgan Collins [Ax0n] http://www.morcant.net/
  133. Perhaps I am too used to kernel releases, but... by TrixX · · Score: 2

    Isn't there a Changelog somewhere? links please?

  134. Gee, it looks awful Outlook like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure you LINSUCKS basement dwellers can handle it? I mean, it's a cutesy looking GUI that looks like Outlook! You should all stick with your PINE or ELM crap, cause you all know those keystrokes right? Even when you are wacking off to pictures of the latest release of GNOME!

    Yes, this is a troll.

  135. Open Standards to replace Exchange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a an Open solution to replace Exchange? We have Pop and IMAP. How about an open standard for Calanders and TODO Lists. One that many clients on many different systmes can support.

  136. Another Thing by Da+Schmiz · · Score: 1
    Is anyone else getting this bug?

    The "fix" in 1.0 is to just pop up an error dialog rather than crash the entire program. Yeah, that's nice, but I would consider sending email a critical feature.

    Am I the only one with this problem?

    Evolution looks cool, and it has several features I want, but if I can't perform simple tasks like clicking "New Message" without a crash, I shudder to think what else is wrong with it.

    In the interim, I'm using Mozilla Mail (yeah, I know, I know) -- at least it has a (halfway) decent address book, decent UI, multi-account, multi-identity support, and the ability to read HTML mail. I dislike it, but when my boss sends me a message full of crazy M$ Word/Outlook HTML tags, I need to be able to at least read it. I'll switch to Evolution the first chance I get.

    It looks, though, that I won't get that chance for some time yet...

    --

    "Anything is better than IE, and you can quote me on that." -- Wil Wheaton.

  137. Calendar, todos, etc. by srichman · · Score: 2
    Then someone says, "You know, Evolution would work just as well with Courier/Cyrus/whatever as an IMAP backend, and then we wouldn't have to pay for the Exchange server or the Exchange connectors.
    What do you do about calendars? Exchange calendars are a wonderful thing in the corporate world: You can see everyone else's schedule (if they permit you), schedule meetings when all participants are free, and send the meeting request to everyone (with integrated RSVPs).

    Is there *any* serious non-proprietary server-based calendar protocol in the world? If there is, I'd like to know about it. My mail sits on an IMAP server, my address book on an LDAP server, but my calendar gets clumsily spread around with synchronization...

  138. Re:NOT FREE SOFTWARE - so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, I'll ask you to call a jihad against Ximian and GNOME:

    Miguel is a hypocrit. He publicly bashed Trolltech via KDE and forced them to free their software. He would not allow them to make money on proprietary software (or KDE to use the only toolkit available to them at the time they started).

    I, myself, am not a free software fanatic. I care about this only because Miguel's hypocrisy is infringing on Trolltech's _right_ to make money in the free market system of the United States via proprietary software--yet he turns around and sells proprietary software himself while acting like it is _nothing_. Miguel's fanaticism with the mere thought of Trolltech turning into an evil dictator (such as you may say Microsoft is) harms the KDE crowd, which _is_ using the GPL license. He wants everything for himself. He is trying to gain control of the desktop via GNOME, he is trying to gain control of the _whole_ development platform via Mono. He has an obsession with Microsoft and it shows. He is chasing on their coattails via Evolution, GNOME, and Mono.

    Now Miguel finally realizes that free software alone won't sell. "Ohh, now I see why Qt was proprietary!" Claiming this proprietary connector is a "small" part is just convering his tracks. What happens if he extends Evolution and relicenses it proprietary after a good number of people are using it? (after all, Ximian does hold the copyright and _can_ make it proprietary). This is the same reasoning that Miguel uses with KDE and Qt. Only, this time I, and everyone else, has _proof_ that Ximian swings the other way.