Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Banco, Warez, Fiction

For tonight's Slashback, eaders have submitted updates and corrections tonight on several recent stories, from the global raid on illegally copied software to ever-more software for your TI-89 to the confusing names (and ownership status) of Mexican banks. Read on for the details.

What about a Dvorak-layout program for the number keys? hex4def6 writes "Ticalc.org is back up for business after the unfortunate incident in which "inapropriate Content" was pressed onto the CD's that Texas Instruments included in their "Fun Kit" graphlink kit from the Ticalc archives. New things in the archives include a neat winamp plugin that allows you to control winamp from your Ti-89 webpage. Check it out here. All the archives are back up, but there is a backlisting of new files submited."

Many happy returns! Eileen Gunn writes "Last August, Slashdot ran a story about The Infinite Matrix, an online SF zine aimed at technogeeks, that posted its first and last issue in one fell swoop, after losing its funding (what's new?). The site was slashdotted, of course, and among those visiting it was a Slashdot reader who threw the zine a 6-month financial lifeline. The Infinite Matrix is now posting new material every day from both Bruce Sterling and Terry Bisson. Plus, there's a new story by SF giant Avram Davidson, more fiction by Richard Kadrey and Kathleen Goonan, columns by John Clute and David Langford. Thanks, Slashdot! You've made my life infinitely more complicated."

This is like reading Jules Verne when he was writing newspaper serials -- and no eBook reader is required.

The perils of translation and the world of international banking. Al Giordano of Narco News wrote from Cochabamba, Bolivia, with a correction of my (incorrect) correction on Yesterday's post about First Amendment protections granted online journalism. He provides a better explanation about nomenclature and the Mexican banking system:

"Banamex, or Banco Nacional de Mexico (the way the plaintiff's name appears on the now-dismissed complaint against us), is translated as National Bank of Mexico.

The 'Mexican Fed' that you refer to is titled Banco de Mexico, or Bank of Mexico.

So you got it right the first time!

The confusion stems from this: All Mexican banks were nationalized before becoming privatized. It's a long and bloody story and in fact my own story about it is one of the exhibits used by Banamex in its now-fracased SLAPP suit.

When Banamex filed suit against Mario Menendez, Narco News and me, it was still a Mexican bank. The Citibank merger wasn't announced until May 2001 and wasn't finalized until July 20, 2001, ironically, the same day we had our court hearing in New York."

Unfortunately, there's no monopoly on sketchiness. S^(2) writes "Here is a better rundown of the warez crackdowns across the globe. I guess people are running scared a bit and this page is hopping from mirrored site to site, but for now at least check out; http://www.cyberworld.ru/scenebusted/ It breaks down what groups were suspected to have been FEDs, which groups/members will be needing legal defense funds, which groups have shutdown, and a bit on the howto of the crackdown, such as agents raiding a house and watching what connections happened without pulling the plug. That can't be legal, can it? Should I hide my pc behind a wall of something benign, like say VHS bootlegs?"

Or, on the other hand, not distributing warez is an option.

397 comments

  1. I've spoken on this very topic many times: by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    Since joining /. I can honestly say I've never trolled. However I've been marked many times unfairly. (abusive moderators seem to like the "over-rated" option for +2 comments or ppl they "don't like")

    How unfairly? Try going from 40 to 23 karma in the space of less than 2 weeks.

    Essentially it started with a post by me calling /. moderators on thier bullshit...to have a +2 comment modded to 0 in ~30 seconds smites of something foul. Moderators not even reading your comment but modding according to name.

    The irony here is even having an on topic post modded down and up so fast it was rather funny to watch. So, rather than get pissed that some a**hole(s) out there are being just that, I created another account.

    What happened? less than 150 post, hit the karma cap on thanksgiving...leading to my lovely sig.
    I've proved my point, to myself and all who read my comments (if at all).

    Judging from the moderation on some of my best comments (wish I had a link) you notice that the "crack smoking" moderators are outnumbered by the non-CSM's.
    My favorite went something like 4 insightfuls, 2 funny's 2 underated, 2 overrated, 1 flamebait, 1 troll (I think)...it wound up with around 12 points worth of moderation...all on one comment.

    What strikes me as "wrong" with the system is this:

    +2 comments get there for a reason and yes there is "bonus" abuse. However, I think the poster who posts at +2 should be given the benefit of the doubt, don't you?
    So, I'd like to see +2 comments modded up, if they deserve it, but to prevent moderator abuse, only allow negative moderation to be effective after 3 or 4 "modding down" marks.

    Reason: none of the newbie moderators nor the experienced CSM's seem to read the FAQ of "don't mod down what you don't agree with" and "don't mod down to punish"...ahem, never happen? just remember 40 down to 23, most moderation took place in literally less than a minute!

    Heh, as a "tribute to CSM's" my sig at one time said "help! help! I'm being repressed!"... gee, wonder where that came from.

    It strikes me as odd that no one has thought of a abuse filter not only for trolls, but for moderators as well.
    You see, trolls can have their account "suspended" for a certain length of time as I understand from some of the -1 comments.
    For moderators, I think, if more than 1/2 of your moderations (every 10 points, let's say) are marked as unfair...then how about "suspending" that account as well (i.e. no moderating for a month/year whatever the cycle, and for the # of unfair marks, apply those negative points to the moderator, perhaps?).

    Anyone have any better ideas, I'd love to hear them.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      No offense, but you sound like a whiny bitch who posts complaints and then can't take it when you get modded down as a result. +2 posts should get the benefit of the doubt? Bullshit. Those with +2 have a power. As a result, they must be put in a more vunerable position to prevent abuses of that power.


      As long as you keep "speaking out on this topic" (aka, whining), you will probably continue to be modded down.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      That's fucking pure genius. Seriously. Everyone knows that the best way to enact change is to lay low and keep your mouth shut. Works every time, without question.

      Complaints, for the most part, should NEVER be modded down or otherwise edited, as long as they are relevant and supported by hard facts, and those who have made a valuable contribution to this "community" should be given a chance to make those complaints heard (via the +2 posting privilege), because that is exactly what Slashdot supposedly stands for - free speech and freedom of information. That's been the central theme of this site for a few years now, and will surely continue in that vein for some time.

      And while it might sound like whining, and while you might think that it's uncalled for because we aren't in charge around here, please keep in mind that Slashdot has always promoted itself as a free and open forum to be used freely and openly by anyone with an opinion. If they can't stick to that model, then they need to stop promoting themselves as such. Slashdot IS run by a bunch of hypocritical ingrates who are only concerned with being "in charge." In reality, they care very little about what their audience thinks; this fact should be made known to everyone who frequents this site under the guise that they are going to be heard.

      Now if you are so spineless as to turn your head to this - or even worse, defend slashdot - you don't deserve to even have a voice.

    3. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Complaints, for the most part, should NEVER be modded down or otherwise edited, as long as they are relevant and supported by hard facts


      But they are NEVER relevant. When I am reading a story about the new linux kernel (for example), complaints about moderation have no place. Moderation has no relationship whatsoever to the linux kernel, nor the arrest of Dmitry Skylarov, nor new patents granted to TIVO.


      If you want to whine, make your own website, and link to it in your .sig. Offtopic posts and trolls will continue to be moderated as such, whether you think they are imporant subjects of discussion or not.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    4. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by michael · · Score: 1

      Bingo. If I understand the above complaint, he's complaining that he's got 50 karma, and that he managed to get two down-mods in thirty seconds on one occasion. Gee, there are only 10,000 readers with mod points at any one time, what are the odds that two of them would moderate something at the same time (hint: it's a birthday problem, the odds are essentially 100%).

      I disagree entirely with A_Non_Moose about +2 posters being given the "benefit of the doubt". In the real world, if you're nice to a person ten times and nasty to them once, what are you? An asshole. But on Slashdot, you're up nine karma. Slashdot's system is *far* more forgiving of abuses than the real world is, and kids like FortKnox who live on Slashdot (713 comments, christ!) need to get out more.

      I was talking to a grad student the other day who's doing a thesis paper on Slashdot. I told her that one of the mistakes made when building the site was giving "karma" a name, because that made it a game. Guess what people, your self-worth is *not* dependent on what value is stored in Slashdot's users table under the karma field. The sole purpose of the moderation system is to make discussions readable. Other sites delete posts that are off-topic. We do not. But I never fail to be amazed at the people who spend all their time trying to fill discussions with garbage and then complaining that the system worked as it is supposed to.

    5. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Michael, as the "your rights online" guy here, I'd like to know why you aren't standing up to condemn editor moderation, IP tracking and profiling, and the violation of the innocent poster's rights when he is getting screwed by the system. How do you reconcile the beliefs that the government is "censoring" Dmitri, 2600, Felton, et al, but that "the system works" when the editors mod users down and refuse to disclose that it's happening? If you guys ran a government, would dissidents vanish in the middle of the night "because they were REALLY troublemakers, trust me"?

      Does the liberal dogma of this site end when the comments section begins? Or do you honestly believe that you practice what you preach?

    6. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 0, Troll

      Woah, dude, you got issues, don't you?

      Lemme ask you, if I modded you down *reguardless* of content for 2 weeks on all of your posts...wouldnt you take it a little personally?

      And don't you read? It was a suggestion.

      Granted, it can be taken or not.

      As long as you keep "speaking out on this topic" (aka, whining), you will probably continue to be modded down.


      Hummm, you have a good point...good thing the framers of the Constitution and Declaration of Independance weren't as lacking in cajones as you are. After all, I'm sure The Kind of England thought the exact same thought as you.

      All I can tell you is...I'm doing it again...speaking out/to people spouting bullshit.

      If you had read you would have gotten the same impression, perhaps, but I also proved a point: creating another accout, posting as I noramlly do I hit the cap relatively fast this, my friend, lends creedance to what I was saying in my posts. Doancha think? Oh, wait, sorry forgot who I was talking to, never mind.

      At any rate, we'll never need therapy as long as /. is around.

      And you and turbine had it right to some degree.

      Well, I'm buzzed, I'm tired and I'm gone.

      Gentlemen...Cheers,

      Moose

      .

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    7. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by FortKnox · · Score: 2

      Jesus fucking christ

      You come into my journal to call me a child for having over 700 comments posted?
      Perhaps, when an intersting topic comes up, I post not only my opinions, but argue with others opinions? Maybe I like to defend my opinions?

      You want to talk about childish, then lets speak of the censorware project, shall we?

      I'd been DYING for authors to come in here and give their arguements so we can sort this crap out, but you come in here to insult me?

      Who's being the child, michael?

      You just proved to me what all the trolls say about you.

      And as far as "getting out more", I have a well paying job, a wife, a son (next May), and a life.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    8. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      One more thing...

      Out of all the complaints on slashdot about slashdot, if you replace those with "complaints about censoring/law/patents", and replace JonKatz bashes with "Microsoft Bashes", what do you have? (If you're really dense, the answer is 'slashdot articles')

      Just because I'm complaining about something not the norm, should I (or the parent) be called an "asshole"??

      BTW - mike, your professionalism needs some tweeking (if you want to get technical you are at your job speaking to your audience). I hope your future employers look at your posts to your 'clients'.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    9. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by turbine216 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree ENTIRELY. If a post is directed at challenging a slashdot editor's statements, as many are, then it is most definitely ON TOPIC. For example, I posted a comment about a month ago, directed against michael. The story was about a Microsoft security flaw; in his post, michael commented that the flaw was a WINDOWS security flaw, when in actuality, it was a flaw in the recent versions of IE. A valid argument, without question, that sat very nicely at +4 Interesting or Insightful for about 30 minutes. Then, suddenly, michael posted a reply to my comment. The rating on my post IMMEDIATELY dropped 3 full points to +1 Troll or something like it. Eventually, the REAL moderators sent some leverage my way and put me back up to +3 or +4. In this situation, the fact that michael's reply was so closely followed by a rash of negative moderation can hardly be called a simple coincidence. The guy doesn't like to be called out on ANYTHING that he says, and he showed it that day.

      My question to you is this...knowing that my complaint was VERY RELEVANT to the posted story, where else would you suggest that i post it?

    10. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dissidents wouldn't vanish - they'd just be moved to New Zealand where they're free to express their opinion ;)

    11. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by michael · · Score: 0, Troll

      You need to readjust your tinfoil hat.

    12. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by michael · · Score: 1

      The slashdot editors are a half-dozen people with other jobs than moderating comments. Versus however-many thousand people with mod points at any time. I'd guess moderation from the Slashdot staff is less than one percent of all comment moderation. I think that I've expended two moderation points today, for example. Taking a system which:

      --does not delete comments
      --makes all comments available to anyone who chooses to view them
      --is more free than any other system with a comparable number of users

      and calling it "censorship" is silly IMHO. When you can tell me about another forum which tolerates users like "The Turd Report" maybe Slashdot will have a competitor for the title of web-based discussion forum with the least censorship.

      Try an experiment: go to kuro5hin.org, advogato.org, any random message board, and start posting "Turd Report" comments. Take note of the mean time before you're banned from the site.

      I'm not claiming that Slashdot is perfect - no place is. But it is certainly one of the best. Most of that is due to Rob's dedication to avoiding censorship as much as possible, for which he gets thanked every day with a load of hatemail from lusers.

    13. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A *little* professionalism, Mike. We are, after all, your audience/client/reason for getting paid.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    14. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by turbine216 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're not exactly lending any support to your own reputation, michael. You're responding like a child who has been caught lying.

      Here's something to think about. I'm the guy who clicks on the ThinkGeek banner ad and buys the t-shirt and the rounded IDE cables. I'm the guys who clicked through to Penguin Computing and convinced the boss to have them set us up with 6 new web servers. I'm the guy who LINES YOUR FUCKING WALLET. And you have the nerve to try and blow me off when I have a complaint. That, my friend, is why you're *still* not a real journalist.

    15. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Amen Micheal.

      Incidentally, I don't think he understands the point of moderation. HE may think he's posting intelligent things, but he's missing the point of being modded down; others clearly do not agree his self-assesment, which is pretty much the whole damn point of moderation.

      I've been at 50 for the last two years, with arond 200 posts, and if I've figured out one thing, its that karma is not a right on a per post basis. It is the case, in many ways, that one or two bitter or whiny posts will ruin your rep and moderators will 'remember' you on subsequent posts, making it more difficult to get modded up. It's called 'just deserts', but I guess A_Non_Moose hasn't figured that out yet, or he'd have grinned and beared (or moosed, groan) it by now. Anyhow, don't stop stickin' up for the system - like anything else, it ain't perfect, but I'll take it over having to manage my own signal to noise ratio any day!

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    16. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The rating on my post IMMEDIATELY dropped 3 full
      > points to +1 Troll or something like it.

      I agree with much of your posts here; but, in the interests of being totally anal, I must point out that the negative moderation here was probably due to slashdot groupthink, not specifically the slashdot overlords modding you down.

      But this is all irrelevant; the larger issue here is slashdot's ongoing pattern of moral comprimise. This began with the selling of the site a publicly-funded corporation. The only way to free yourself from the oligarchy is to build a commune; the only way to avoid the nonsense of the slashdot oligarchs is to build a community-maintained site. Until such a thing is built, slashdot (much like napster, another "dorm room" project) exists to be comprimised.

      --If you can see my IP address, you can get a job in the high-paying world of privacy invasion!

    17. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by michael · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight - you are permitted to be rude to me when I take the time to answer your questions nicely and explicitly (for example, see your current .sig file or your journal entries) but I cannot? I'm just trying to get a feel for what the rules are, you see.

    18. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Try an experiment: go to kuro5hin.org, advogato.org, any random message board, and start posting "Turd Report" comments. Take note of the mean time before you're banned from the site.

      Well, it would depend on the velocity, but having spent a lot of time on k5 -- more then /. up until a couple weeks ago :( -- I'd guess it would probably be modded to zero quickly, where it can't be seen by normal users.

      Yeh, it would be 'censored' but its a completely transparent system, one that any 'trusted' user (basically anyone that posts a lot) can audit.

      k5 gets one order of magnitude more hits. But 2 or 4 orders of magnitude fewer 'crap' posts. (there are also safety features to prevent automatic flooding. But unlike slashdot's obnoxious 20 second/2 minute rule and lameness filter, since they are actually applied intelligently and based on the human dependent mod system). In fact There are fewer 'zero' posts every week then there are front page stories.

      The real problem with slashdot is that you seem to, basically, hold your readership in contempt (especially CmdrTaco). While other sites try to foster a real sense of community you (guys) seem to be actively discouraging it.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    19. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      You get paid to respond, I do not.

      If you talked to me rudely at my job, I'd be professional, for it is my job. You'd never see me jump outta form.

      But I'm not getting paid for this, and I'm using my free time.

      But if you are truely offended, I'll change it.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    20. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by sllort · · Score: 1

      He shouldn't have to adjust his hat. Mine works great, but not everyone has a good one.

      The point is that you can put all these suspicions to rest by making Editor Moderation visible through messaging. Just fix the bug I link to in my sig.

      If you choose not to, don't fool yourself into thinking we won't notice. Your audience isn't stupid, remember?

    21. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by sllort · · Score: 1

      ? I'm just trying to get a feel for what the rules are, you see.

      So are we. For instance, I was IP banned and bitchslapped without ever breaking one.

      We're asking for some openness, transparency, and forthcomingness. Post some Rules. Tell people you moderate, profile, monitor, flag & ban. And don't tell me you don't have time for new features.

    22. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by sllort · · Score: 1

      what are the odds that two of them would moderate something at the same time (hint: it's a birthday problem, the odds are essentially 100%).

      I've actually submitted the solution to this problem many times before, but I will do so again for the record:

      When moderating, moderators should be able to choose a threshold they wish to moderate to. If I see a comment at one I think should be 3, I would like to moderate it Insightful to 3. If I moderate it and it's still at 1, it goes to 2. If I moderate it and it's at 2, it goes to 3. If I moderate it and it's at 5, then I don't waste my moderation point. Someone linked a comment last week that was moderated up 14 times (+14, Insightful) because of the Birthday Problem you just mentioned. This doesn't change moderation to be like K5, it just makes Slash moderation un-broken and limits the number of accidental +5's that spout garbage.

      If you try to prop up a straw man about not having time to add little features, I would point out that if you have an acknowledged problem (you just acknowledged it) in the basics of Slashcode, and you're spending all your dev resources on new features, then that argument is bogus.

    23. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by sllort · · Score: 1

      Try an experiment: go to kuro5hin.org, advogato.org, any random message board, and start posting "Turd Report" comments. Take note of the mean time before you're banned from the site.

      When you are moderated down at K5, K5's system tells you who moderated you down, even if it was the Administrator. If you're moderated down at Slashdot, Slashdot sends you a message that says you were moderated down by a User, even if that User is an Editor.

      Stop propping up straw men, I'm tired of disemboweling them. You can't compare yourself to those sites because their moderation and banning systems have accountability and yours doesn't. You refuse to add it. Read my sig.

      for which he gets thanked every day with a load of hatemail from lusers.

      Isn't there some love mail mixed in with that hate mail? There's got to be someone other than you who appreciates all the work he's doing.

      I don't think people would be this upset about Slashdot if it wasn't something a lot of people cared about. That's a testament, as you say, to Rob's hard work. But if all he's getting now is hatemail, maybe he could try responding to it with some openness and documentation. Either that or he could add another automated tracking system to slashcode, maybe to weed out users who send him hatemail. Another slap in the face to his users, another artificial barrier, another way to make the Administration less human and less accessible. Maybe he could attach another snide comment to it like "Editors are Users too".

      In the end, it's really his call.
      -

    24. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by sllort · · Score: 1

      others clearly do not agree his self-assesment, which is pretty much the whole damn point of moderation

      When Others don't agree, the point is that each Other has the same rights. When an editors has unlimited Rights, we in turn don't have any. It would be exceedingly simple to deliver a message to a user when an Editor had moderated them down, and it would stop all of this guesswork in it's tracks. You should be aware, by the way, that not every user has equal rights: when you're marked with the $rtbl flag, you cannot participate in moderation. You'll never get any notification that this has happened to you.

      The opportunity to be open and honest about who is doing the moderation was addressed in a bug report on Sourceforge; the link is in my signature file.

      You can brush people off as "too unpopular to be modded up", but without any means of verifying that, you'll excuse me while your half baked opinions make me giggle.

      -

    25. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the interests of being totally anal, I must point out that the negative moderation here was probably due to slashdot groupthink"

      I would agree with that. It's actually fairly easy to get someone moderated down if you get in with a "No, moron, you're wrong" comment early enough, even if their post was well argued. I can only imagine if michael@slashdot.org directly disagreed with you, the modbots would feel required to send you into oblivion as a 'troll'.

      Maybe that's why the editors hesitate to post. Kinda pointless if the broader readerbase is going to mod them up to 5 everytime and crush disagreement.

      Oh, fix the FAQ you lazy bums!

      --Slashdot User at my IP Address.

    26. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's posters like you who make me and others not log in to post.

      I once modded about twice a week and browsed at -1 to see what has been moderated down. Sure, most of it was trash, but time and time again I saw acts of senseless moderation where the lower UID gets modded down if there are duplicate posts, people with multiple comments in a story, all being modded as 'overrated' since there's no metamod for that, and retroactive moderation because people chose to speak up against the system.

      I feel sorry for people like you who miss out on everything that goes on here outside your limited view of things. No wait, I feel sorry for you because you probably miss out on a lot in real life, too.

    27. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Apotsy · · Score: 2
      Michael, if you want people to stop being suspicious of you and the other editors, you're going to have to make the site more open.

      That means making things so that you no longer have to "guess" what percentage of moderation is being done by the editors, nor having to "think" how many mod points you've spent in a given day.

      Make that information publicly available. Have moderation history done by the editors listed in their user info. And fix the notification so that it makes a distinction between moderation done by editors and non-editors.

      The more open things are, the better.

    28. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."and kids like FortKnox who live on Slashdot (713 comments, christ!) need to get out more".

      Do you understand that you are talking about the very same people who make this site possible and who, indirectly, pay your salary?

      I mean, is this your idea of professionalism? Calling your user base names? michael, this is NOT an irc server. When you are paid a salary, it's the real thing.

    29. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice point Michael, perhaps a lot people can't forget all the shit with the censorware project.

    30. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by TRS-80 · · Score: 1
      While not really relavant to the discussion about moderation, I would point out that IE is so integrated into Windows that any IE update is in effect a Windows update. I came to this journal from the story about the uber-patch for IE 5.5SP2 and 6.0, and it was pointed out at least once that any other program that uses the IE engine is vulnerable, since it's available at the system level.

      But anyway, back to the topic at hand. I've read all the 76 comments so far (at -1) and have a few comments to make. Except that I suck at written expression, and so am going to make a few random statements:

      I've been reading /. since Jan 1999 (nearly 3 years), but have only posted 15 comments. Why? because /. is but one of many online communities I participate in, and I simply don't have the time/care enough to get more involved in it than reading the front page, and occasionally reading the +5 comments attached to a story. When I first started using /., I read the comments on far more stories than I do now. This is in part because (like many things), /. has become a victim of its own success - as a discussion site, it breaks down with too many users. As a weblog of cool sites and stories (News for Nerds. Stuff that matters.) it performs well. But the discussion part has attracted legions of trolls who (in an attempt to attract attention to themselves) ruin the quality of discussion. So slash had various anti-troll measures implemented, in an attempt to restore the quality of discussion (I read somewhere that one of the aspects (paradoxes?) of online discussion is that to maintain a community in which free discussion is encouraged, rules must be put in place to stop wasted discussion like trolls.)

      Anyway, there has probably been misapplication of these tools occasionally. But more to the point, people want their posts to be seen, because they (like most people) like the sound of their voice. And so they get upset when their posts get moderated down (for whatever reason), and blame the moderation system. Now whether the /. mod system is better/worse than the k5 system is not something I'm going to argue, since the amount of traffic that k5 gets is not the same as /. (or so it seems). While /. is more open, in as much as you can view every comment, k5 is more open in as much as there isn't a threshold. (Wait, I am comparing the mod systems, bugger. Oh well). And so, people get pissed off about being modded down (and so losing their visibility) much more on /. than on k5.

      Enough about k5. What I'm trying to say here, is that inequities in the /. mod system are in part because a) no mod system is perfect b) it tries to be very open, and stuff (note: my train of though was derailed here)

      Anyway, guys, get over it. I sincerely doubt that /. is a good place to hold a meaningful discussion, simply because it's so big. It's not like your posts are really that important. Perhaps you should consider another discussion site, which, while it may be smaller, gives you a better chance of becoming a big-shot poster? ;-)

      As for the claims of editor abuse of moderation, well, the editors are human too, and will almost certainly have biases (and egos - the censorware.org account (while not complete, and from only one side) shows this), and so are probably guilty of not being objective, but at least they try. As for CSMs, it's a well known fact that people don't read the docs. I'm on a mailing list which just had an influx of newbies, and it's amazing how many didn't bother to read the rules and guidelines which were posted to them when they joined. People are stupid/jerks, get over it.

      Something else: this is the sort of discussion I like to read, since it's got a remarkable lack of trolling that makes it possible to read at -1. "Discussions" that are only readable at +2 (or more), are more just bunched of topic-related comments, since responses are filtered out (unless you click on the "## messages below your threshold" links). I don't, in part because (as I say above), /. is one of many fora which I read/participate in, and my time is limited. The net is vast (mmm, GitS), and there's plenty of discussion sites out there that cater for any taste imaginable, and no human could possibly read all of them.

      Anyway, that's my poorly organised (and not really on-topic - but better here than in a story) diatribe. I probably won't make any more comments for the reasons above, but while the info stored by websites is important, there's better targets than /., where this argument is between people who've come to hate each other. Or something (this is more related to the yro comment).

    31. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      Heh,
      I guess I am an infant since I have well over 1000 posts accumulated over the last say two or three years. Okay, in 900 days is 1000 posts honestly that much? So ive read slashdot daily and commented heavily in every 50-100 articles, BFD.

      Jeremy

    32. Re:I've spoken on this very topic many times: by juuri · · Score: 2

      Just a throw away comment but over the years I have noticed this abuse from Michael as well. In fact I recall the original outcries when he was made an admin.

      Oh well as a free community we can't... oh wait a second these guys get PAID for this. And we pay for it by looking at ADs and contributing content.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
  2. fucking bastards... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

    You wait and see how quickly those fuckers "retract" that little blurb by making the whole thread mysteriously disappear. This has been going on for ages...it seems that the authors have been fairly lucky for the most part, as they've only had to cover up those nasty "unwanted" posts on very few occasions.

    Information wants to be free my hairy white ass.

  3. We should all submit this by hodeleri · · Score: 2

    I submitted this as a YRO, waiting for rejection now.

    We all should submit this story to slashdot...

    1. Re:We should all submit this by hodeleri · · Score: 2

      Yep, rejected.

      Come on fans, post along with me!

    2. Re:We should all submit this by turbine216 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Submitting it will only annoy the editors. Instead, everyone should add this link to their .sig:

      http://slashdot.org/journal.pl?op=display&id=288 1& uid=169099

      Make sure to add a little comment indicating the topic of this discussion. That ought to attract a little attention.

  4. Hey now, let's not mock for number of comments by Galvatron · · Score: 1
    Looking at an aggregate without any idea of how long they've been posting for (an average of 1 comment a day for 2 years isn't that bad, for example), or what their life is like (perhaps they have a job where they're stuck from 9-5, but have time to post on slashdot), is very misleading.


    I too have posted over 700 comments, but on a day to day basis, I spend very little time posting, and most of it is when I'm stuck at work.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  5. Hello? Pot? This is kettle. by TechnoLust · · Score: 1
    Hrmmm... Does anyone else find it amusing that micheal, who WORKS for /. calls FortKnox a kid because he spends time there? That would be like me as a Network Admin saying the people I work with spend too much time on computers!

    I don't think micheal understood Moose's comment at all. He wasn't complaining that he got modded down. He was complaining that he got modded down because he was logged in as A_Non_Moose, rather than based on his posts. THAT is the issue.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  6. Make the problem known!!! by turbine216 · · Score: 2

    Add the following link to your .sig:

    http://slashdot.org/journal.pl?op=display&id=288 1& uid=169099

    Perhaps if enough people find out about this bullshit, some change will come about...

  7. big hairy deal by mr.ska · · Score: 2
    Do I care if my IP is seen? No. Do I have anything to hide? No. Am I a troll? No.

    It would be truly amazing if a moderation system existed that got rid of trolls and flamebaits quickly... but as it is, there's some turds who like noise over signal, and as long as that keeps up I'm fine with /. authors moderating, bitchslapping, whatever.

    Don't like it? Ask yourself why.

    --

    Mr. Ska

    1. Re:big hairy deal by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      I think you've missed the point here. Nobody's pissed off because of the fact that authors can moderate and bitchslap. We're pissed for three entirely different reasons:

      1. Because authors tend to "push their own agendas" with moderation, in severe contradiction to one the core principals behind distributed moderation (see the slashdot FAQ for CmdrTaco's explanation of why EVERYONE gets to moderate).

      2. Because Slashdot tries to pass itself off as a COMPLETELY FREE AND OPEN FORUM, when in actuality, it is quite restrictive and subject to censorship by those who maintain it.

      3. Because "anonymous coward" is supposed to mean "anonymous coward" - not "anonymous to everyone except for the guys who want to bitchslap dissident voices." If editors can view the IP's of posters, then the entire purpose of the AC system is defeated, and should thus be removed.

      None of the things that you mentioned (editor moderation, bitchslapping, IP availability) are inherently WRONG or inexcusable - however, the fact remains that Slashdot refuses to provide readers and posters with appropriate caveats. If slashdot wants to keep these practices up, then they need to inform their audience that they will do so. However, it is unlikely that they will tell anyone, as it could lead to a large-scale withdrawal of a great deal of its readership (a.k.a. "money in OSDN's bank account"). I think you see where I'm going with this.

    2. Re:big hairy deal by holloway · · Score: 1
      If you've got nothing to hide you shouldn't mind being tracked?

      Teehee.

    3. Re:big hairy deal by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1

      Does Mr.Ska ever go against the Slashdot party line? No. Does Mr.Ska kiss Slashdot's collective ass? Yes. Is Mr.Ska just another acerebral Slashbot? Yes. Should Mr.Ska shut his cake hole? Yes.

      --

      No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

    4. Re:big hairy deal by michael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few points -

      1) bitchslap. Rob's name for a perl script to take care of flood-bots. He should have named it "anti-flood.pl" instead. Rob is the only one who has ever had access to use it; I don't think it's been used many times on the site at all; I'm almost certain it hasn't been used in many months. The dreaded formkeys now prevent flooding from scripts proactively instead of the previous reactive system, so it's doubtful it will ever be needed again.

      2) IP availability. According to Slashdot, your IPID is "8e451..." Mr. Ska's IPID is "b18e8..." Whoop. Big invasion of privacy there. The IPID system is solely a reaction to people abusing anonymity to post hundreds of crap comments. Now people who do that get automatically IP-banned for 72 hours. I'm all for it.

    5. Re:big hairy deal by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      According to Slashdot, your IPID is "8e451..." Mr. Ska's IPID is "b18e8..." Whoop. Big invasion of privacy there.

      Can you expand on that? If I wanted to make an anonymous comment, on an article that I already posted on as "FortKnox", will they both be the same 'IPID'?
      Point being, number or crypted number, it doesn't matter, cause our "so called" anonymity is nothing for people that have posted with logged in account.

      Please, also note, my non-agressive demeanor, and non-insultive attitude. I'd appreciate it if you'd show the same to the others posting in this journal entry.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    6. Re:big hairy deal by michael · · Score: 1

      Yes, if they're both posted from the same IP address. It's an MD5 hash of whatever the actual IP address is. Doesn't mean it's the same person - there might be ten people logged in from the same corporate firewall, or people coming through AOL's proxy servers, or whatever.

      I *think* the IPID records are supposed to be kept for a rolling two-week period, but I'm not certain that that's the actual policy, so don't quote me on that.

    7. Re:big hairy deal by turbine216 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      an MD5 hash of an actual IP address can still be deduced to a real IP address...there is no question about that. And again, I really don't have a problem with a website logging my IP address or making it available only for purely "administrative" purposes. My problem (and i think everyone's for that matter) lies in the fact that this information is not made available to all slashdot readers. The FAQ NEVER states that IP addresses are available (in ANY form, MD5-hashed or otherwise) to editors. Take, for example, Malda's explanation of the AC system from the FAQ:

      We think the ability to post anonymously is important. Sometimes people have important information they want to post, but are afraid to do it if they can be linked to it...

      That's it. That is the ONLY mention of anonymous posting that is included in the FAQ, and it leads me to believe that my anonymous posts are just that - anonymous. But they're not. The last sentence even goes so far as to indicate that anonymous posters CANNOT BE LINKED TO THEIR COMMENTS, when in fact, they can.

      While this might not seem like an issue, it is. As long as editors have the ability to moderate poster comments, they have the ability to discriminate against certain users, based on that user's IP address. That's where the entire problem lies. If editors can moderate, they have two VERY unfair advantages - infinite points, and the ability to truly push their own agenda on any topic they choose. If either one of these two abilities were removed (and the other made blatantly obvious to readers), there wouldn't be a problem. If posters were TRULY anonymous, then editors wouldn't be able to single them out even when they post anonymously. Conversely, if editors were subject to the same rules of moderation that regular users were, then even the ability to sort by IP address wouldn't help them, as they would no longer be able to mod a single user into oblivion.

      I don't see why this is such a big problem for you to understand, michael. You seem like a fairly reasonable person (when you take away your very un-journalistic biases), but you have yet to acknowledge the fact that some people might have a problem with this system. Tell me, how do you rationalize the fact that these unadvertised "features" give editors a very unfair advantage over dissenting readers? Why can't the "features" be advertised? Why does the AC system even exist, if AC's aren't really anonymous?

    8. Re:big hairy deal by michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unlimited power for the owners of a site is a fact you're never going to be able to get around. We've got SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE on our side. We've got Apache's log files to identify you, and a firewall to keep you out. That's just the way the world works.

      If you don't like it you can build your own site. You can even use the code we provide, for free. What a deal!

      Agendas? We have the *ultimate* agenda tool, the ability to decide what stories get run! Nothing else compares. If you think our story-selection sucks, my advice is don't read them.

    9. Re:big hairy deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Michael, you seem to not even realize how two-faced you are being. You are putting up a straw man argument wrt to the editor's unlimited power. Nobody is complaining about the fact that everything we do is logged, it's about what you do with the information and how you use it. The FAQ says one thing, while you guys do quite another. You guys "flag" accounts and profile IPs. You use unlimited mod points. How about putting that out on the FAQ?

      You guys rail at some company and rant about "your rights" when some company or foreign government does something which you perceive to be censorship. Yet you guys do the same thing on your site.

      Finally, the Love-it-Or-Leave-It argument. Um, weren't you the one that said the US's civil liberties were trashed, how our liberties are all deprived. To use your argument, if you don't like it, how about you leave the country, and goto some socialist country whose policies you admire so much.

    10. Re:big hairy deal by sllort · · Score: 1

      Rob's name for a perl script to take care of flood-bots.

      It was used on me, and I have never in my life used a script to access Slashdot.

      I was also IP-banned.

    11. Re:big hairy deal by sllort · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Michael Sims, I refuse to fight your straw man.

      No one cares about story selection. Let me spell it out for you: we don't trust you. We want to know when you're moderating posts, when you're banning users. You have detailed systems to accomplish this and everyone knows it.

      If you don't want people to know when you're posing as a User and moderating posts, that's fine. But if you don't tell people about it in your FAQ, that makes you just as hypocritical as every corporation you post an article to bash. You're forgetting your audience. We're nerds, computer geeks, programmers, hackers, freedom fighters. We have a finely tuned bullshit meter. And you people are setting it off.

      Correct your FAQ to tell people that you're logging IP's and moderating posts. Or don't. But if you choose not to tell people what you're up to at the very least, don't whine about the consequences of being caught. You run a website that lives to "out" people, hell anytime Microsoft makes a wording mistake you are on them like hounds. That's your userbase. If you want to talk the talk, you gotta walk the walk.

      Read the link in my signature. We're just asking for a message when an editor moderates us so we know when we're in danger of being blacklisted. And you know what I mean by blacklisted, the $rtbl flag, a secret user database flag to mark "the bad people". We read the Slashcode. We're not stupid. We won't be silenced. And the more you talk down to us, the angrier we'll get.

      You should know what happens when people act condescending.

    12. Re:big hairy deal by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      I was hit with it as well (my 'homepage' link gives some details), the explanation being that he (Taco) used the script to disable accounts for other reasons as well (in my case, moderation abuse). I've been IP banned as well, but I suspect this happens when someone behind the company firewall (or maybe 5 different jerks) manages to get 5 posts downmodded. After 24 hours, this ban gets lifted (happened at least twice).

    13. Re:big hairy deal by plaa · · Score: 2

      2) IP availability. According to Slashdot, your IPID is "8e451..." Mr. Ska's IPID is "b18e8..." Whoop. Big invasion of privacy there. The IPID system is solely a reaction to people abusing anonymity to post hundreds of crap comments. Now people who do that get automatically IP-banned for 72 hours. I'm all for it.

      I'd say one of the central questions here is: are the IPIDs attached with the message? I'm not so interested in whether a Slashdot editor discriminates some individual, but what if, say, the FBI/NSA/other-three-letter-department comes knocking at your door? They can get any information that you store about the comments. If the IPIDs are attached to the messages, then when posting anonymously you always risk the chance that your IP _can_ be traced from that comment. (The MD5 hash doesn't help in this case, since you just have to try 2^32 combinations - shouldn't be a major problem for a fast machine.)

      The flood-banning could be implemented just by keeping a log of IPs or IPIDs, and how many messages have been posted recently, but without attaching them to the messages in question.

      Are the IPIDs attached to the posted messages? That's the point I'm worried about.

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
  8. How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    If Slashdot can effectively remove comments from view (setting comments at -2 does this. Yes, I think it can be changed by manually editing the URL, but this is pure lawyerism, and not likely to stand up very well in court) then how can they defend themselves against M$?

    Remember the lawsuit they got alleging that /. was aiding and abetting in dissemination of stolen materials or some such? (Don't have a link, and too lazy to look). /. claimed that they don't censor anything. Clearly this is false.

    I've got no problem with dropped submissions. But bitchslapping, tracking IP's, etc... Sounds like in the effort to make it easier to appeal to advertisers, /. is painting themselves into a legal corner.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      All i can say to that is EXACTLY. I am of the opinion that Slashdot's "upper brass" (if they can legitimately be given that title) has made themselves IMMENSELY liable for ALL comments posted on their site, because of the fact that there ARE situations on this site to which "censorship" is the only term that can be applied. Modding to -2 is an example. While the comment still "exists" in the database, there is no indication that would lead any reader to believe that. This is comparable to imprisoning a person secretly in order to cut off their ability to make their opinion known. Is this censorship? In Skylarov's case, Slashdot seems to think so. And if slashdot has EVER censored a poster in this manner, then ALL comments on this site are their responsibility (as recent cases have shown). Maybe it's time we started letting software vendors know about this...they might be interested in knowing that they've been essentially duped by those clever editors...

    2. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by michael · · Score: 1

      The only comments that were ever modded to -2 were due to a bug in the moderation system, fixed very quickly. There's a story posted about it somewhere.

      I think the problem here - our failure to communicate - is because you're believing the various conspiracy theories without evidence.

      And no, moderation is not comparable to putting someone in prison.

      And no, from a legal standpoint, the moderation system does not make Slashdot more or less liable for comments posted. The law on this is now fairly clear - since Slashdot has the power to remove comments from the database, once we receive a complaint about any particular comment we're essentially "on the hook" for its content. If Slashdot receives fewer hassles over comments than other sites (and I think we do) it's because of the potential bad publicity (see what happened when Microsoft tried it), not because the law protects us in any fashion.

    3. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      fair enough -- I'll wait for more evidence before arguing this point any further.

      However, you seem to be avoiding the other concerns that I and the other readers here have expressed - in regards to IP tracking, unlimited editor moderation, and discrimination. Would you care to respond to those allegations?

    4. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about slashdot's bad press from deleting the CoS document that was posted? Why are you willing to stand up to MS but not to the CoS which is ostensibly much more evil than MS can ever be? I never understood that decision? Why not also come clean about accounts that you have tampered with? that's the collective you, not the sigular you. If someone has been affected by admin intervention, shouldn't they know that? For instance, though I don't really troll much, have never used a script to post to this site, etc. this account still NEVER gets mod points. The account is old enough, and I do participate regularly enough that I should, at least once get points. This leads me to suspect that my account has been given the secret "don't let this guy moderate" flag in the system. Can you (and will you) please confirm or deny?

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    5. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by michael · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Scientology situation was handled way above my head. I have no particular opinion about it, except to note that Scientology has more money than VA Linux (excuse me, VA Software) does. And more lawyers. And a demonstrated immunity to bad press.

      I don't think most people understand moderation very well. I see there's a reply that is correct about changes in Slash 2.2 that let the site maintainer turn off moderation, comment posting and story submission for particular users. CmdrTaco is the sole administrator of that on Slashdot.

      So if you never get moderation points on Slashdot, there are two possible reasons. You might not qualify normally - moderator points are assigned to people who aren't within the newest accounts created, read the site often but not too often, and so forth, several different criteria. Or you might have been flagged. Doing things like moderating up goatse.cx links is a good way to get flagged as a bad moderator if CmdrTaco notices.

      Is that "political"? Yeah, I suppose. But the politics being promoted is "trying to run a good discussion site", same as the motivation for everything else.

    6. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That was very informative. I do appriciate that you answered my question.

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    7. Re:How does this affect M$ lawsuit? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

      The law on this is now fairly clear - since Slashdot has the power to remove comments from the database, once we receive a complaint about any particular comment we're essentially "on the hook" for its content.

      Really? How does that interact with the Court ruling that message board posts are opinions, not facts?

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  9. Twit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Farm karma" my ass. I have a proven track record as a troll on this site. In case you haven't figured it out, getting your trolls modded up increases visibility and response rates. It's just another requirement of the game.

    You, OTOH, are nothing but a troll wannabe who posts a bunch of senseless garbage that nobody bothers looking at because it's at -1. Your life is meaningless; you are nothing but a mimbleton with negative karma. You can come back and bitch at me when you actually get a couple of biters, or when you start posting intelligently. Until then, leave us trolls alone when we're doing our jobs.

    ~wally

  10. Talk to the trolls by 13013dobbs · · Score: 2

    You might want to look at what some of the 'trolls' are posting in this journal entry. They do have some insight into how the Slashdot editors (ab(use) their powers.

    --

    No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

  11. I admin Slash 2.2 myself. by Blue+Aardvark+House · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can this account of yours metamoderate? Assuming positive karma, your account should be able to metamod, given the fairly low UID.

    If you cannot metamod, your account probably has been flagged in $rtbl, the Real Time Black List. Flagging the account also makes the account ineligible for moderation, AFAIK. It can be flagged by account, ipid or even subnet. If ipid or subnet is used, any account using said ipid or subnet will be affected by the action. Comments can be sorted by these id's, and the resulting comment list looks like if you were just browsing a user's comments list from clicking a link in a discussion. You also might be on the Top Abusers list, but I'm not too sure. I have yet to use said feature myself.

    This account, despite high karma and existing for over 6 months now, never has moderated either. Also, this account has lost metamod capabilities some time ago. I'm pretty certain that my ipid has been $rtbl'ed, put on the Top Abusers list or both.

    You gotta admit, it does take care of the multiple account issue, listing by ipid/subnet pretty much merges your accounts together.

    1. Re:I admin Slash 2.2 myself. by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1

      It would be most interesting to me if they would actually admit it though... I know I've been given the "hidden" slap, it's only all too obvious. I suspect the motivation for this action was political.

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    2. Re:I admin Slash 2.2 myself. by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      Interesting... this account Im using now is ~5 months old and I have never received mod points.. I can metamod though. I even tried checking/unchecking/checking the willing to mod check box under my settings, nothing.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    3. Re:I admin Slash 2.2 myself. by jallen02 · · Score: 2

      No kidding :( I have only one account and I have not had metamod in a long long time. I never abused my metamod privileges or my posting privs. I have always been straight up. *sigh*

      oh well its just the /game.

      Jeremy

  12. Huh? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Wow, you sure showed him!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  13. Yeh, no kidding. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I've already gotten about 394 comments posted in the month or so I've been here (and karma hovering around 50 now)

    When they reimported all the old files into the DB I checked my old account. Almost 4,000 comments. michal is basicaly insulting everyone who uses slashdot 'alot' instaid of just posting boring and poorly thought out stories.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  14. Thats not true by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I had a couple posts modded to -5 once, after a bug in slashcode that allowed images to be embeded in comments. I stuck a few in (nothing offensive). After a while a script was run that killed all image tags and modded them to -5.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  15. "more evil" by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Who would you rather piss off? Steve Case, or Osama Bin Laden. Both may be 'evil' in a certain light, but while AOL users may be stupid they aren't out on suicide bombing runs.

    I wouldn't get into a legal battle LRONs minions over some stupid AC comment.

    Microsoft isn't going to make your life into a living hell or anything...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:"more evil" by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1

      But evil is evil isn't it? Both should be resisted or eradicated of possible. Indeed, you make my point - The CoS *IS* the more evil of the two, and thus should be stood up to.

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    2. Re:"more evil" by damiam · · Score: 2
      Microsoft isn't going to make your life into a living hell or anything...

      You've obviously never used Windows.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  16. Warez bust on my birthday by jkeyes · · Score: 1, Funny

    that was some present can I take it back to the store?

    1. Re:Warez bust on my birthday by darkmudsong · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ranger Online (named after the famous pirate killing ship)is busting a lot of software piracy sites these days. RIIA, FBI, Microsoft, and US Customs has hired them to find stuff.

      Rangerinc.com has code developers in Toronto, venture capital from media lawyers in Vancouver, a web page based in Seattle and the scanning operations are in San Diego.

      All the big Microsoft busts, MP3, and warez sites have been busted by this outfit. They're basically bounty hunters. You might have been scanned from this address: 209.95.126.167, they probably have others in San Antonio.

      They regularly troll IRC chat rooms, web sites, for copyrighted downloads. Its a bad time to be hosting a WAREZ site.

      A better idea is to contribute to GNU or some other free software site and don't buy software from the corporate police state. The consumer still has the right of choice.

  17. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't even play computer games, and I've heard of one of the warez groups that looks like they were nearly wiped out, namely 'razor'.

    Apparently this was actually rather comprehensive, as opposed to running around closing college students' ftp sites, yes?

    1. Re:Heh by Daengbo · · Score: 0

      Im sorry, but OFFTOPIC?

  18. Did I miss something? by mrpotato · · Score: 1
    Ticalc.org is back up for business after the unfortunate incident in which "inapropriate Content" was pressed onto the CD's that Texas Instruments included in their "Fun Kit" graphlink kit from the Ticalc archives.

    Uhh, maybe I wasn't there or something, but what was that "inapropriate content" that was on the CDs?

    TI's press release makes it sounds like pr0n...

    --

    cheers
    1. Re:Did I miss something? by Kronik+Gamer · · Score: 1

      Exactly how much pr0n could you fit onto a Ti89 calc? I mean, the graphics on that calc are good, but not THAT good. I'd need at least a 256-color monitor to take advan.... umm.... I mean who would want to look at pr0n when there is much gaming to be done! Yeah, that's it! damn...

    2. Re:Did I miss something? by mliu · · Score: 3, Informative

      After snooping around a little with Google, it would seem that TI has banned programs featuring:
      Profanity
      Pornography or sexually explicit content
      Drug-related content
      Content promoting or depicting terrorism or racial/ethnic hatred.
      Content promoting or depicting violence in schools
      Programs made exclusively for cheating (e.g. fake memory-clearing programs)
      Copyright or trademark violations (e.g. calculator ROMs, text or graphics that violate others' copyrights or trademarks)

      Programs that were specifically mentioned by people included Drug Wars (too bad, that was a fun game, but I could see how parental no-fun no-humor censor types could get pissed off) and strip blackjack (which somehow had no pornography in it actually, or so they say).

    3. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for real gamers are fucking wack. their not geeks, their just fucking losers.

    4. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you missed this thread, read it for a discussion that deals with not only "inappropriate content" but free speech in general. A game called Pimp Quest might be to blame. The story is here.

    5. Re:Did I miss something? by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Profanity
      Pornography or sexually explicit content
      Drug-related content
      Content promoting or depicting terrorism or racial/ethnic hatred.
      Content promoting or depicting violence in schools
      Programs made exclusively for cheating (e.g. fake memory-clearing programs)
      Copyright or trademark violations (e.g. calculator ROMs, text or graphics that violate others' copyrights or trademarks)


      This pretty much describes the entire software library for the TI series of calculators.

    6. Re:Did I miss something? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Luckily I overcame my gaming hangups some time ago.

      What I mean by this is, I'm no longer ashamed to admit that at my ripe old age (28) I still play games. Online games, rpg games, text adventure games... heck, I was thinking of gettimg me one of them consoles, or a gameboy so I have something to do during tedious meetings.

      Yup... no longer trying to look innocent when browsing thru the gaming section of my local hw/sw store (you know... the way I did when I was 13 and stole furtive glances at the adult magazine stand).

      --
      No sig
    7. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering your userid, I think there's a good chance you'd be interested in this.

  19. Defense? by saintlupus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    which groups/members will be needing legal defense funds

    "Uh, he didn't know it was copyrighted, your honor."

    Seriously, what the fuck. How is some warez rat going to be better off with a non court appointed attorney?

    --saint

    1. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you wouldn't have the faintest clue of where to start to even remove the simplest copy protection from a program.

    2. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are remarkably stupid. What are you, like 13? Maybe 14?

    3. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok please give a discription of how you would go about creating a cd-key generator for any given peice of software, your pick. Don't like that, post how you would go about removing the common cdilla protection, and using one of these groups cracks doesn't count. How would you do it from scratch. Explain away big man...

    4. Re:Defense? by Anthracks · · Score: 1

      How is that in any way a response to what he asked? He didn't say it was easy to crack copy protection, he said that there is no way that people distributing pirated software will be able to mount a serious legal defense, no matter who defends them. If you can't even *READ*, I doubt you are exactly a top-level cracker yourself. Anthracks

      --
      Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    5. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just being dumb. Cracking is a skill that can be picked up like any other. I don't spend my time learning how to crack/h4x0r, but that doesn't mean I couldn't, nor does it mean you're better/smarter than me (or vice versa).

      None of these things explain how someone who was CLEARLY breaking the law is going to be able to get off the hook with an expensive lawyer, though.

      Try again?

    6. Re:Defense? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If OJ can get away with murder, some 18 year old in a college dorm can get away with IP infringement - with a good lawyer.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:Defense? by billcopc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well I hate to say it but I'm somewhat in support of these groups, if only because I'm sick of buying the latest games only to discover that the best part of the game was the free demo. Truly great games are one in a thousand, and even then they don't last long enough.

      That's where the warez scene can swoop in and deliver salvation: download a stripped-down rip of whatever game you want, try it out for a couple days, then go out and buy the full-blown masterpiece. Or delete it and forget it ever existed. It encourages the game houses that work hard, while cutting the revenue stream of the half-assed hype-machine con artists, most of which sell their crap at Mallwart and other idiot chains.

      Think of it like music: they put a catchy song on the radio, you pop 20$ on the album, then find yourself duped because 8 of the 10 songs are just filler. You can't ask for a refund because you've already 'consumed' the product (because that's what it is: a product). They'll politely tell you you're a pirate and that it would be unlawful for them to return your money. Same thing applies to PC games.

      To get back to the point, I say they deserve a fair trial (if such a thing exists), not on the basis that I support organized non-profit piracy, but rather because the law system was most likely manipulated by corporate interests and thus the accused were unjustly treated.

      The problem lies within the game market itself: the insane price-gouging that's going on and getting worse every year. Why should I blow 80$ (50 of your U.S. dollars) on a product I haven't seen nor experienced, and that carries no useful warranty ? Just look at Hasbro and how they're destroying the game industry by raping classic titles, making flashy smelly shit with the original concepts and selling them anywhere there's a cash register.

      Ironically, the shareware business is practically dead, even though it was probably the most honest form of software marketing in existence. You had a decent game/utility on its own, not just a crippled 5-minute unstable demo. If you enjoyed the experience and wanted to prolong it, you'd pay 15-20$ for 2-3 extra episodes, or a bunch of USEFUL extra features in the case of utilities/mini-applications. And what if you didn't need or want the extras ? Then you just kept on using the shareware version because it was actually a fully enjoyable piece of software on its own.

      Warez may be illegal, but it definitely has its place in the world and on the net. And its working members certainly aren't rats. If you want a rat, go find your favorite pro-invasive-law lobbyist. They're the ones making our lives miserable and taking away from everyone. Warez takes away from those who are screwing us in the first place.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    8. Re:Defense? by teeth · · Score: 1
      None of these things explain how someone who was CLEARLY breaking the law is going to be able to get off the hook with an expensive lawyer, though.


      No-one is "CLEARLY breaking the law" until their "expensive lawyer" has failed...

      --
      >>>>truth; beauty; unix.<<<<
    9. Re:Defense? by kesuki · · Score: 2, Troll

      Are you serious? Are you brain dead? A good lawyer could mean freedom, or a reduced sentance. A court appointed attorny could mean getting stuck in a cell with murders rapists and terrorists. Remember 'hacking' is now a crime of terror. Equivalent to blowing up a building with 10,000 people in it.
      A good legal defense could get that law removed by the supreme court. How can you compare writing software to keygen an application to taking thousands of lives????

      If you think this is just about warez it isn't. This is about people who rob convenience stores being thrown back out after three months while some kid who wrote a keygen gets a life sentance WITHOUT the possibility of parole. Even if you think warez is wrong do you really believe that it is a crime on the level of murder?

    10. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a skill? so picasso was just a skilled artist, but just as a skill it can be mastered if you bothered?

      blah, no you wont even have a clue how to crack. Simple things assuming you took some asm 101 you will know what jumps and nops are and how to utilize them, however thats where the theory ends. Know c++? how about cracking a self encrypting polymorphic code that SecureRom and CdZilla is using? how about writting a USB Dongle emulator? right, in a year of hard work you might get to where the busted people were. Not sooner, and not without a holding hand who already has gone there and can tell you much more from experience...

      but sure, delude yourself

    11. Re:Defense? by spudnic · · Score: 2

      "I didn't know any of this was even going on. Someone must have cracked my box and set up an FTP server. I swear! Ok, then prove I'm lying."

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    12. Re:Defense? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful
      1) Warez kiddies usually do not posess the correct skin color.

      2) Warez kiddies generally cannot interest celebrity lawyers into taking their case.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usual rich white kid attitude. I can steal all I want but I'm not bad. Some kid stealing $5 in smokes from a 7/11 is a terrible person who should spend the rest of his life in jail.

      It's high time we had one law for all. You steal you're a thief.

    14. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Picasso was actually creating something out of nothing. Crackers are problem solvers, not creators. Not only that but the problems they solve are artificial and essentially trivial. By trivial I don't mean "easy". By trivial I mean irrelevant, of little value.

      Whatever floats your boat though....

    15. Re:Defense? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but the law says you hack an encryption code you're a terrorist. Now if hackers got treated the same as a guy who robs a 7-11 we wouldn't HAVE anything to complain about. Instead they're discriminated against, treated the way kevin mitnick was, and told their crimes are as bad as murder in the first degree.

      Think salem witch trial because that is the way society treats 'crackers.' It isn't witchcraft understanding how computers work, and the fact that there are multi-million dollar raids on warez people. Who again are going to be treated as terrorists under US law any of them that aren't lucky enough to have thier own countries refuse to let them be prosecuted under US law that is. Well, all things considered when was the last time you saw an FBI goon checking your bags to make sure you didn't shoplift anything from wal-mart? you know in some areas shoplifting can account for some serious losses. And they're loosing actual goods that they had to pay for, not 'revenue streams.' which are tricky at best to determine.

      Considering that the rise and fall of napster nicely coincide with a rise and drop in CD sales I'd say most people out there are honest and will buy anything that they feel is worth thier hard earned bucks.

      The fact is that as a reslut of septemper 11 the laws that were pushed through congress make hacking an act of terrorism. The FBI is out for blood. These people NEED good lawers because they don't deserve to be treated like murders or terrorists. They stole software, and lots of it. They don't deserve Life in prision without any parole though.

      As for rich kid hah, I'm below the poverty line. I made $8,000 last year. The only reason I can live on that little is because my family is helping me out. My budget is why I love linux/BSD (free and runs great on cheap old hardware.) And FreeBSD and linux are really what kept me out of the warez scene because I can't afford to run state of the art hardware or $100+ programs.

    16. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If a big money fancy lawyer can let a person walk free after killing two people, then a case of copyright infringement should be no problem

    17. Re:Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exhibit A:

      600 burned CDs, with suspects fingerprints clearly visible on 2/3rds of them.

    18. Re:Defense? by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've got no argument with your take on the game industry today... in fact, I'd like to add that I thought we were supposed to be over the hideous copy-protection schemes a decade ago and that 'expansion packs' (aka 'A $30 part 2 to that $50 part 1 you bought three months ago.') are a blight on the industry. I'm back to console gaming until they start pulling similar tricks.

      However, I think that the reason you believe that shareware is almost dead is because the mainstream producers/publishers we got accustomed to (Apogee, Epic Megagames, iD) have either replaced the word 'shareware' with 'demo' or went the commercial boxed route because they were successful enough. Well, that and the exodus of BBS users to the Internet. Anyway, there is still decent shareware gaming to be found. It is admittedly a couple of steps behind the Hollywood-style production process you see in most commercial games today, but in many cases that is made up for by the gameplay itself, the cheaper pricing, and the appreciation from the developer. I've been following the comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic and comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim newsgroups lately, and aside from a 6+ year flamewar there were a couple of suggestions for decent games from small developers. The first, Dominions (http://www.illwinter.com/dominions.html), is a turn-based strategy game that is somewhat similar in style to Master of Magic. The other, Starships Unlimited (http://www.apezone.com/), is a turn-based strategy game that is not unlike Master of Orion. I like turn-based strategy games. Also, I bought a game a couple of months ago called Pontifex (http://www.chroniclogic.com/pfx.html) in which you engineer bridges on a budget that are supposed to hold up under the stress of a train with a variable weight passing over it a variable number of times.

      All of these are pretty neat games and meet your definition of shareware. I heard about all of them by wandering off of the normal game-finding path. (http://www.swreg.org) is one avenue many shareware developers (including all of the above) are turning to to sell their games; they should have a storefront on there somewhere where you can browse titles to download or buy, but I think the site might be broken right now. If you don't mind wading through it, Usenet is a good place to spot game reviews or announcements. (http://www.isonews.com) also has a pretty good game review forum on it, though given the general direction of the site these tend to be about standard commercial games and not shareware.

      Anyway, I just wanted to mention that shareware is still alive and still worthy of trying out if you know where to look.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    19. Re:Defense? by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      You need to start shopping at EB. If decide you don't like a game and you still have the reciept, you can bring it back. Even if you've already opened it and played it. Works great when you find out that a game only takes 2 hours to play and has no replay value.

    20. Re:Defense? by billcopc · · Score: 2

      True, that does address the problem of "no warranty" I had mentioned, but why should I need to return a game in the first place ? Remember the dark ages of software, before the www became moderately mainstream around 4-5 years ago. You'd run down to the local radioshack or EB (which was much less game-oriented back then) and paid 5$ for a shareware disc of Duke Nukem or Quake. You played it to the bone, had a digital orgasm and called the 1-800-idsoftware to buy the full game, which arrived shortly in your mailbox. If you didn't like the 5$ episode, then you just deleted it and handed it to a friend.

      Now with the net, it's even easier : just download the first episode for free, play it out, then order online if you liked it. Often they will let you download the full game minutes after you've paid for it.

      You don't have to get off your fat ass and find a parking spot in the downtown frenzy. You don't have to endure nosey mindless sales kids who don't know a thing about _service_. Most importantly, when you call or email for tech support, you get a personal and useful answer, not just a corporate autoreply and some incompetent clerk's copy-paste solution.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  20. Dude by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    If you want to ruin the rest of your life standing up the CoS go ahead. It may be noble to stand up to evil, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea. The information was all on the web anyway, a google search would have gotten it for you. Fight evil yes, but choose your battles to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Dude by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that you are wrong. Not at all. I just think (and this is only my personal opinion) that slashdot is a little hypocritical in how they handle these things. Just my personal opinion...

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
  21. original links... by 4n0nym0u53+C0w4rd · · Score: 1

    I love slashback. Except that the links to the original stories are only sometimes listed in the slashback blurbs. Wouldn't it make sense to always link to the original slashdot story?

    Just my $1.34 Canadian

    1. Re:original links... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just my $1.34 Canadian

      Come on, now... We've still got a couple more years to exchange our money before it takes $CA 1.34 to buy $US 0.02.

    2. Re:original links... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Maybe his opinions are worth more? :-)

  22. Ticalc? TI-89s? by SumDeusExMachina · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm sorry, but I draw the "geekiness" line at pissing away your time writing silly crap like that for a calculator. A calculator is a tool of science and business, not a gaming machine. I cannot begin to describe the problems that it has caused me as a high-school math teacher. Not only has the rampant Tetris-playing caused my students to stop paying attention in class, but the ability to store "notes" in the calculator is a major source of cheating on tests. It has gotten so far that we have had to require that only scientific calculators be used on the upcoming midterm exams.

    On an unrelated note, why don't you write about HP calculators some time? They are far superior from a technological and software standpoint, and RPN works a lot better than standard algebraic notation. Alas, I suppose now that HP's discontinuing them, they don't matter to the Slashdot crowd anymore...

    --

    Is your company running tools written by ma
  23. TI-89 Emulator by Vardamir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone should port a TI-89 emulator to the Strong-ARM 206MHz based PDAs, like the new Zaurus. Hardest thing would be to make a good GUI because the regular keypad on the TI-89 would take up too much room.

  24. Warez: The New Drug? by Brontosaurus+Jim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Damn, it's really shocking to read the crap those agents pulled on the warez groups. Even ignoring the obvious immorality/illegality of it, it seems to me like they put a lot of time into the raids.

    What the hell are they wasting their time for (and our money) on little stuff like this? It's like the federal government has no capability to distinguish between minor crimes and major ones.

    If we don't watch out, the next war (after terrorism) will be on software. Damn, imagine if the BSA ever got to use guns. *shudder*

    That's not a good thought. Sigh, I'd better stop posting to /. and go get the papers ready for my companies upcoming audit.

    1. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      crime is crime

      the police try and arrest people who commit crime

      it's hardly surprising that after 10 years of 0 day warez someone is going to knock on the door with a badge and a gun

      they should've stuck to fido, BBS and CD's in the mail

      maybe now ppl will use a vpn or something sensible

      trading in irc is like selling drugs on the street corner, do it long enough in the same spot and your gonna feel some heat.

      too bad for the fall guys

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by Wojtek · · Score: 1

      Quite simple. Companies have money. When you have money you can make anything you want illegal. If you've played your cards right once you've made things illegal you're the only source for some product or service, or at least one of the few sources. It's a dangerous spiral that makes sure the rich keep on getting richer. Mind you, it does end at some point with the companies back being broken under it's own weight.

    3. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I do agree that the FBI could be spending their time on terrorists or serial killers. Violent crimes should be their main job, then physical robbery, and everything else last on the list.

      In the older warez days people put Cracktros into the games, old Amiga and c64 cracktros and demos. It wasn't about copying games, it was about hacking, skill, showmanship.

      Today its about ripping people off, companies selling counterfeit office, windows, adobe. This goes against everything most hackers believe in.

      The same thing goes for Mp3s, its like a bootleg tapes, even thou its illegal, people love them. I think this is a kind of double standard on morals, its ok to be robin hood and steal, but you cant sell.

      Morals, laws and justice. 3 completely different things.

      -
      What party are you?

    4. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by somebody+else · · Score: 1

      Soon it will be illegal to have a personal firewall, if it prevents the spooks from spying on you.

      Once the spooks learn that free software (gnu/linux, iptables, portsentry, tripwire, etc.) can keep out their fancy, new, legislation-backed, snoopware, they'll be arresting people for hosting distro mirrors.

      Will they risk arresting Linus (ala Dmitry Skylarov)? Or will they learn the lesson of public opinion and go after VA/Sourceforge (ala ElcomSoft)?

      Just a little food for the conspiracy theorist.

      --

      ~~~~~~~~
      Signature illegible, could be somebody else.
    5. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing the BSA is privately funded and NOT a government agency. If so, they'd already be using guns.

      I dont' care what any of these companies say... these warez distro d00ds are not the criminals. It's those pricks in asia that are stamping out WinXP for $5 a cd. (we all know it's only worth $1 - what a profit margin)

      They can bust into my house and steal my copy of pine... they can take it out of my cold dead hand...

    6. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by arcadum · · Score: 0

      I'm an Eagle Scout, and YES I do have the rifle shooting merit badge. -- Matt

    7. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Your quite wrong there i believe, as none of the 'big' groups busted, ie 'DOD' sold software. They crack it, trade it and so on, but they are not the ones down in Chinatown (local Sydney/Aus example) burning those to cd's and selling them for $5!

      Okay i may be wrong now that's all based on my (relativly speaking) small warez scene exposure from years ago..

    8. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the bootleg shit you see on the street comes from the mafia, not some hackers.

    9. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Dude: where have you been? It's been illegal to pirate software for "quite some time now..." This is nothing new.

      Just another reason to use Linux and open source free software. If you choose Microsoft, you pay or else "the man" will come for you...

    10. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      i didn't say it was right

      i'm saying that it's not surprising

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    11. Re:Warez: The New Drug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you agree that it's somewhat satisfying to see smartass little warez pricks given criminal records?

  25. Mr. Quattrin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that you?

  26. Communist Manifesto on the TI-89 by Pludodog · · Score: 1

    If only we had had these back in the old days, maybe the soviet union wouldn't have collapsed afterall.

  27. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Samuel+Hughes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since you mentioned tetris, I had to post this. At my high school, everybody was playing games on their calculators -- from Race to MARIO. However, the 83plus users couldn't play tetris, because it only worked on the 83. Anyway, I created a program called "TETRIS." What it did was displayed "Loading..." on the screen, while it archived every variable, including all of the unusual vars (such as the Str1 and Str2, etc.) except for the lists (I saved them for later). I put their screen in "split mode," while setting the graphing to Polar, with Xmin being larger than Xmax and Ymin larger than Ymax (resulting in a "Window Range" error screen). The program then filled a list named "SYS" up to 999 items, then going on to L1, L2, L3, etc.. until the program filled up the memory and threw an error.

    I gave this to another kid (a snobby kid who never stopped playing games on his calc), and it crippled his calculator. He had to pay me five bucks to get it fixed.

    I later lost my calculator, and I got it back two weeks with all of my games played repeatedly (with the high score list changed) and all my vars archived, lists filled, etc., resulting in it getting returned (they apparently thought it was broken). I lost it two more times, with the exact same results before it was returned to me.

  28. Just a Question by AbbaZabba · · Score: 0

    All of the news articles are rather sketchy, but how were they caught? Did feds infiltrate the organizations by acting as couriers? Were sites insecure and not locked down for security as government hackers were able to bypass?

    --
    Aye aye aye aye, I am the Frito bandito.
    1. Re:Just a Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have setup few topsites and followed fxp traffic through..

  29. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by gmack · · Score: 1

    Heh that's the same thing my father used to say about the computer.

    But that was before I got him addicted to minesweeper.

  30. DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Versa · · Score: 1

    I am sure those warez busts will help out the recession, put some of America's best and brightest (some MIT students and top IT executives supposedly) in jail. I am sure this will sky rocket the economy considering they supposed lky helped with the 6+ billion of dollars lost due to piracy? Give me a break.

    1. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were so smart, why did they do something they knew was going to get them in trouble sooner or later? There is absolutely no reason to use pirated software, watch pirated movies, listen to pirated music, and so on. Alternatives abound.
      Don't want to pay for software? http://www.fsf.org is an obvious place to start. There is no need to for commercial software!
      Why crack other people's software, when you can create your own?

    2. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you posted about what a swell fella dimitri is like 2 articles ago and then poost this than you qualify as a big fat hypocrit, you do realize.

    3. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Warez kids are the best and the brightest?! Please explain. My notion of "best and brightest" doesn't associate itself with people who produce nothing, steal from those who do, and get caught doing it. This seems more like evolution in action to me.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Versa · · Score: 1

      I consider people at MIT and other leading universities and top IT executives to be some of the best and brightest. As for getting caught, till now almost no one had to worry about getting caught, less then a handful have been arrested on this charge before (at least on an individual basis, not counting corporations).

      Think of it like speeding, what if one day they pulled EVERYONE over that is speeding even 1 mph over. Would that make the papers? Would people be pissed off? Would they have a right to be pissed off? Things to ponder.

    5. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yes i'm sure a genius like you got accepted to MIT no problem...NOT.

    6. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is my first post for the month of December. Sorry. I do differentiate between, say, wanting to watch the DVDs you have purchased in Linux and wanting to download the latest "0-day warez" so you can play RtCW without paying, though.

    7. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot, these weren't the little kiddies downloading the games, these where the fucking people cracking the shit for fun. Dmitri was doing it for profit, these guys do it for a challenge and fun. Which is worse the guy who breaks the protection and sells it (along with a great spamware package, but i won't get into that) or the people that take the time to break pretty much any scheme that comes their way just for the challenge of it?

      Oh and since you obviously have no clue, here's a big clue on a stick: The people who just got busted are the same people who figured out how to crack CSS.

    8. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you were the one who cracked dvds, Nope it was Dezzy from DoD (who released a buggy DVD SpeedReader two weeks before deCSS, afterall DeCSS got famous because MoRE saw what SpeedReader was doing and fixed it and released it with source called DeCSS)...

      Also, I bet it does not take any brain to figure out USB based dongles, and write emulators for USB devices..

      Also, I bet it does not take any brain to figure out encryptions on game exes that perform dynamic code polymorphing and decrypting..

      Also, I bet writting keygens is easy..

      please...

      these people were smart
      these people did it for nothing but glory, and gave it all back to the people on the net

      and you piss on them...

    9. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The people who just got busted are the same people who figured out how crack CSS.
      Too bad.

    10. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Misplaced effort?

    11. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by kaxman · · Score: 1

      Right in front of me, signed by one "AnonymousCoward". Idiot

      --
      Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
    12. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by dasunt · · Score: 2

      I agree. Being able to take a binary that has no code that you know of, and that might have strict anti-piracy measures built in, and being able to adapt the code of that binary to make it bypass all that anti-piracy crap is really, really trivial.

      I mean, any 5th grader can do it... :P

    13. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by istartedi · · Score: 2

      My, what responses I got. They were all pretty much along the lines of "these kids are so smart because they got into top schools and they crack". Of course it takes a kind of "intelligence" to crack things, but I must reiterate that this does not make them the best and the brightest.

      They fail to see the forest for the trees. What truly useful inventions could such genius produce? Maybe they could have been like Dean Kamen, producing medical devices and earning enough money to sink it into pie in the sky scooter projects. Maybe they could be "cracking" the human genome for cancer cures. Maybe a lot of things I can't even imagine. We will never know. They were too busy ripping into other people's work.

      Intelligence is only part of being "best and brightest". These kids are like burly men with big hammers. Instead of using their hammers to pound nails, they use them to smash Windows. When you look at these people, and multiply their "best" factor by their "brightest" factor, the product is futility.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    14. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the best and brightest people are the ones that get on with doing the they want to do in life, even if that means doing things of which Istartedi disaproves?

    15. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by istartedi · · Score: 1

      By this line of reasoning, every crack smoker downtown is the best and brightest, since I don't approve of crack smoking.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    16. Re:DOJ, just doing their part for the recession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By this line of reasoning, every crack smoker downtown is the best and brightest, since I don't approve of crack smoking.

      It is entirely posible that they are amongst the brightest, never having meant them I can't say. The point is that your liking or not liking what they do has zero impact on how bright they are. As to whether they're "the best", that obviously depends on what they're supposed to best at; without that information saying they are or aren't "the best" is meaningless.

      If you have even semi-plausible arguments as to how your disproving of an activity impacts on how bright the people doing it are then please present them.

  31. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by sQu@sH · · Score: 1

    As a student who has passed a whole lot of time in many mathmatics, physics, and computer science classes with my TI-89, I take exception to your notion that TI-89 games are "silly crap." I use my TI-89 to advance my programming skills thorough games. I also use it to gain attendance points. I, unfortunately, have been party to many boring professors, who's lack teaching ability, and adeptness at inducing sleep by lecture has forced me to find other ways to pass time in class. Maybe instead of complaining about the use of calculators for games you should encourage students to use their calculators to enhance their mathematics, programming, or scientific skills through creating games, algorithms, or some other activity. I don't know about your ability to bore students, but there are ways to teach that keep us deliquent geeks attentive. Try to reach them where they are. Give them a reason to pay attention.

  32. The bigger question by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Is how did they manage to get their site shut down? I mean I can see TI pulling the plug, but how did they manage to pull the site?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:The bigger question by _Bean_ · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There was probably a slashdot story about it and thousands of readers tried to leach their entire archives in search of calculator pr0n.

  33. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by mliu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a former high school student, I can tell you that it's not the Tetris that caused students to stop paying attention in your class.

    I dunno if you remember what it was like to be a high school student anymore, but if it's not the Tetris it'd be something else, like staring blankly out the window or day dreaming.

    The Tetris on the calculator wasn't so fun that I would think about it when I wasn't playing it, it was just something I would do when I was bored to tears and needed a distraction. Rather than blame some calculator game for why your students no longer listen, maybe you should look at other possible causes........and yeah yeah, I know, you don't have a whole lot to be working with there, given the subject you're teaching to high-schoolers, but I have definitely had good and bad math teachers. The good teachers were the ones who made me think, and came up with interesting ways to link the subject back to real life. And even in their classes, I would play calculator games when they were spending too long on a subject (maybe for other people in the class) that I already understood.

    So if all your students have stopped paying attention in your class, maybe rather than blaming the easy to blame calculator games, you should look at yourself and how you're teaching them.......

  34. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High School math teacher?

    Did CS not work out?

  35. Beating the warez spooks! by codepunk · · Score: 1

    #!/bin/bash
    echo "Fuck off FBI!" > /var/ftp/incomming/windowsxp.iso
    echo "Fuck off FBI!" > /var/ftp/incomming/window95.iso
    echo "Fuck off FBI!" > /var/ftp/incomming/photoshop.iso
    echo "Fuck off FBI!" > /var/ftp/incomming/win2000.iso

    --


    Got Code?
  36. ya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Before all you scoff at the busts remember this: the group hit the hardest "DoD" where the ones who told that 16 year old kid how to crack CSS. They told him how to do it, he just wrote the code. I remember you guys all loved DeCCS right, well DoD are the ones who figured it out how to do it...

    Oh if you notice nobody from FLT or DVN got busted, after evading that sting you gotta admit FLT is fucking ereet.

    1. Re:ya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLT and Class are in co-operation
      Myth is in co-operation with Deviance

      FLT and Razor recently went into quite a hacking fist fight... razors shells were taken over, then razor stole 500th release from flt...

      this must have left them weakened, or so we would think, by DoD was also taken down, and they were most secure and kept secret group for quite a while now...

    2. Re:ya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because FLT as a bunch of Faggot who sell slots and make money from CDs.. they probably pay off the cops too ....
      dumb shits

    3. Re:ya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it says specifically that this bust was aimed at DoD from the start and any other busts were because of interactions of those people with DoD.

      I don't know a lot about all of this but they targetted DoD and got 100% of them, I don't doubt any group they target would be any different.

  37. Why? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Look, I'm as much anti-copyright as anyone. And I'll haply use the results of these warez kids. But I don't really have much sympathy for them. They got lazy and stupid. They should have been using more secure setups, and been a lot less 'interconnected' operationally. (I'm not saying don't socialize, but for god sakes, don't go around giving out shell accounts and stuff to everybody).

    The other thing is, how are these groups funded? As far as I can tell these kids are warezing just so they can feel like big criminals (witch they are, if he FBI is putting so much work into catching them) but they aren't making any money, are they? If so, how?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other thing is, how are these groups funded? As far as I can tell these kids are warezing just so they can feel like big criminals (witch they are, if he FBI is putting so much work into catching them) but they aren't making any money, are they? If so, how?

      As far as I can tell they aren't making any money, at least that seems to be the opinion of the FBI. As to how they're funded, I don't really understand what you mean. They're a bunch of people with an (illegal) hobby. I don't crack software, I don't have the know-how or the inclination, but I have computers, I have lots of hard disk space, a CD writer, ADSL, electricity to make it all work, a roof over my head etc. I'm "funded" from my salary. Guess they're the same. How are you funded?

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly, these people do it for fun. It's competition between groups to get the release. What they do does take alot of skill. I bet money that the typical MCSE certified slashdot reader would have absolutly nothing to offer these groups skill wise. You have to be very good at reverse engineering, cracking and networking. Also these people aren't kids either, most of them are well into adulthood, which is pretty much required to reach the needed skill level.

      Look at it this way...the guys that got busted in the last two days are to the warez scene what linus and alan cox are to the linux scene. The silly "warez d00dz" you commonly see in public space on the net are the equivalent of the microsoft bashing slashdorks of the linux scene.

    3. Re:Why? by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      The whole point really there was the extent that worldwide law-enforment agencies went (not just the FBI) went to bust them.

      From that info and what i would assume, the fed's had been infiltrating the sites for a long time, and the only way to get into the scene is to trade! Thats why if you look at those lists, _apparently_ there were a few FED (FBI / whatever) OPERATED WAREZ SITES! Now think about that for a second. Obviously they went all out in their attempts to infiltrate to the top, ie DOD, Razor, etc. I applaud them for that, at least you know they are doing their job well. ;) (Of course we'll just have to ignore the hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of software they probably traded! :)

      One annoying thing i saw was my local respectable news paper (SMH.com.au) put a definate spin on the story, breaking from IMO their usual unbiased position. With the heading "Software pirates boast proves idle" with an excerpt: "[bandido DOD member] had boasted on the Internet that he would never be caught"
      The funny thing is the article finnishes (quietly) with: "No arrests have been made."
      Src: http://www.smh.com.au/news/0112/13/national/nation al16.html

      Although any hype here is overrated, these busts are nothing like some of the Cracks/Warez party busts in Europe and the US back in the early 90's! :)

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud them for that, at least you know they are doing their job well

      *rolls eyes* Yeah, it must have been real tough to infiltrate a group of people who's only requirement for membership is that you hook them up with a fat pipe and a lot of storage space then idle a bunch in their IRC channels.

      If the feds were really doing their jobs 9/11 wouldn't have happened and whoever is sending out free samples of anthrax would be in custody instead of a bunch of not-for-profit warez groups.

      What's sad is the people who get so wrapped up in the "they're criminals too!" meme that they can't see what a fucking tremendous waste of government resources these operations were. Don't they realize that at the very same time terrorists were running amok with passenger jets the FBI were hard at work protecting the people of the United States from software pirates?! And we aren't even talking about the guys with the truckloads of bootleg Windows CDs -- oh no, we're talking about college students and people with real jobs who pirate software as a hobby!

      With priorities like this I'm almost ready to say that as a nation we deserve whatever bad things happen to us.

  38. Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by supabeast! · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I am an excellent student, and did very well in math classes until middle school. You see, I have this strange problem with math; I can process mathematics just fine, but I am almost entirely unable to recall from memory almost any mathematical theory beyond simple logic or multiplication. Put a decent text or a good set of notes from such a text in front of me, and I can plow through math with no trouble. Take it away, and I am unable to even handle that pythagorean theorem stuff.

    This, of course, led to terrible grades and multiple math class failures in high school; due to the fact that no matter how much I tried or studied the shit just would NOT stay in my fucking head. Know how I finally got through? I convinced my mom to buy me a TI-85 calculator that I plugged all of my math notes into every day, and used it during ever single test I took. If my teachers had been pompous pricks like you, I would have been simply branded a cheater and never finished high school.

    Teachers like you prove the old adage "Those who can do, those who can't, teach." If inflexible morons like you were allowed to exist in the business world, programmers would suffer having to work without reference, sysadmins without man pages, et al.

    I only hope that as mankind progresses, we can isolate the gene that produces personalities like yours, and destroy it- and people like you- utterly.

    1. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As one of my teachers told me, in college, 'lets face it. In real life, if you don't know the answer, you're going to either look it up, or ask somebody. So, on the tests, bring in your text books, go nuts. But the tests WILL be such that if you don't know the underlying theory, you're screwed.' And he did it, too. He'd structure some of the questions such that they looked like english wordings of the equasions, but he'd alter something. He'd go ahead and square root something that the forumla is supposed to, so if you plug it in, you'll square root it again, and fuck up. It was great.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically what your saying is "I'm good at basic arithmatic, but i suck at everything else."

      Well whoopty fricken do for you.

    3. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If my teachers had been pompous pricks like you, I would have been simply branded a cheater and never finished high school.

      Well, they would have been right; you're a cheater (I'm assuming that the tests weren't supposed to be open-note).
      Perhaps your head was too full of meaningless repetitions of your favorite obsceneties to have any room for math trivia like Pythagoras?

      I think that if students put as much effort into studying as they put into scamming and cheating, I could give a lot more A's.

    4. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can remember everything else, just not math, so you had to cheat. Oh, did I type that correctly? the tears were blurring the page

      Did you try studying?

      Hittin' the books?

      Of course not. Math is "special" and you are "different", not simply a lazy moron...

      bleh

      And I'm sure the girls would have noticed you too except for those damn jocks or society or some other lame excuse

    5. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those who can't understand math are subhuman"
      - Robert Heinlien via Lazarus Long

      If I were you, watch it befor I started talking about defective genes.

    6. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Funny. I'm exactly the opposite. I can pick up a theory from just an example or two (at least the concept, if not memorizing formulas), but I'll tell you 76 + 23 is 93 half the time. Led to the same result. At least until I got to high school, where the concept was the point. It's like math dislexia or something. Pretty easy to catch most of the time, but I was always too lazy too check tests. Of course, now, I get to have an 89 take care of me, but I still wish I could add.
      "What's two plus two?" "Duuuhhhh..."
      Feel like a fucking dumbass. The aftermath of getting a calculator watch in second grade I suppose.

    7. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, look, I can type things into Google, and misspell.

    8. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by mochan_s · · Score: 1

      if you don't know the answer, you're going to either look it up, or ask somebody
      Most subsequent chapters in Mathematics builds on the ones previous to it. If you have to keep looking things up, then by the time you get beyond half the book, you'd have to be looking up an enourmous amount of stuff. Besides if you aren't given a context (a chapter) from which to solve the problem , how are you going to look it up when you don't know what. However, when it's in your head, you see the pattern immedeatly.

      And he did it, too. He'd structure some of the questions such that they looked like english wordings of the equasions, but he'd alter something. He'd go ahead and square root something that the forumla is supposed to, so if you plug it in, you'll square root it again, and fuck up. It was great.
      OK, I'm not sure what you mean but mathematical problems don't come with a personality (i.e. made by this and this) for one to reverse engineer the solution.

      Alas, for 99% of the people, Math problems are limited to questions on a test or the end of a chapter. And, for the 1%, 99.99% of the problems solved are to prepare for the 0.01% that they'll be the first person in the world to solve.

    9. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I should point out that I'm not referring to Math specifically; I believe the course was actually statistics. Take, for a really basic example, the difference between understanding that the Pythagorian Therom will give you the length of the hypotenuse of a right-angle triangle, given the length of the other two sides, and remembering that the actual formula is a^2 + b^2 = c^2. I'll be the first to admit that this might not hold as you move further along the complexity axis, but it tells you where I'm coming from.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you're just a dumbfuck.

      Yeah, probably that.

      -Rufus

    11. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      In math however, if you don't understand the problem you can't easily ask the question or look it up. I watched a guy wrap a string around a barrel that he was going to make a wishing well out of. After he did that he cut the string into segments the width of one the boards he was going to nail around it. He then counted the segments and I suppose went out and got that many pieces of wood.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    12. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by floW+enoL · · Score: 1

      > Put a decent text or a good set of notes from such a text in front of me, and I can plow through math with no trouble. Take it away, and I am unable to even handle that pythagorean theorem stuff.

      So you're saying that if you had a book in front of you, which, in deriving the relevant theorems and equations, does 99% of the work for you, you can do the (remaining 1% of the) math, but otherwise not. What does that mean? It means you don't know the material. Period.

      > I convinced my mom to buy me a TI-85 calculator that I plugged all of my math notes into every day, and used it during ever single test I took.

      So, assuming the tests were closed-notes, you cheated.

      > If my teachers had been pompous pricks like you, I would have been simply branded a cheater and never finished high school.

      But you *were* cheating. You didn't deserve to pass high school.

      >If inflexible morons like you were allowed to exist in the business world, programmers would suffer having to work without reference, sysadmins without man pages, et al.

      Do you see sysadmins walking around with "Linux for Dummies" under their arms? Do you see programmers walking around with their noses buried in "C++ in 24 days"? Of course not. man pages and such are references, and are not analogous to, say, a math textbook. they would be analogous to a table of integrals or a multiplication table, perhaps. If an unknowledgable "moron" like you was working for me, you'd be out in an instant.

      >I only hope that as mankind progresses, we can isolate the gene that produces personalities like yours, and destroy it- and people like you- utterly.

      On the contrary, I hope that people like you (lazy, cheaters) will be culled out instead.

    13. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a cheat, obviously, you just TOLD everyone that you used your calculator to store "theory" when it was not allowed. That's what a cheat is.

      Too bad you couldn't simply work hard like everyone else.

      "Money will just NOT stay in my pocket. I HAVE to steal."

    14. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YAAFT. TPHBT. HAND.

    15. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. good comeback, weed.

    16. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by Daengbo · · Score: 0

      At the time I attended engineering school, it was rated in the top five in the country. EVERY exam was open book, open note, calculator, satellite link, whatever.... The point was, the material we were tested on was SO complex that, if you did not understand the underlying theory, nothing at that point could help. High school math, on the other hand, is not in this class of difficulty, and can / should be held in your head. In my opinion, I meet too many young students who couldnt multiply without a calculator. Dont even get me started on their abuse of homonyms in their native language.

    17. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      what R U talking about? R U trying 2 say something to me?!?!?!?!?!? Christ, I know what you mean. I don't understand the purpose behind public education these days; my daughter, who is four, and is in junior kindergarten, reads at what they regard as a second grade level. Why? We gave her books and read to her when she was younger. Unlike the kids who still get pacifiers..... Hmmm, my opening example is SO BAD that it's tripping the lameness filter, so I'll have to edit it down a bit.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    18. Re:Math teachers like you are why I hate math. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      My math teacher thought I had to have homework every night. Either I was too busy/lazy to do it, or I'd do it and get it wrong. I miss the grade school days when the work was all done in class and you could ask your teacher about it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  39. I'm a bit confused ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a correction of my (incorrect) correction

    Is that like !(!(!(a))) ?

  40. Just a lame excuse by woodstok · · Score: 0, Troll

    To avoid creating world-wide panik the feds are claiming they are busting software pirates. In reality they are only after the al-Qaida network. All those busted are just nasty talibans trying to destroy our great free society and bring back rock-carving as the most influental information source.

    1. Re:Just a lame excuse by klocwerk · · Score: 1

      *troll*
      how has this NOT been moded down?

      --

      "You worthless post!"
      -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  41. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

    I draw the "geekiness" line at pissing away your time writing silly crap like that for a computer. A computer is a tool of science and business, not a gaming machine. (s/calculator/computer/g)

    Is that you meant to say? I'm guessing that a pencil is a tool of science and business, not a gaming tool, too. Doing anything serious on a TI-89 is a decent challenge, though less than the -83's or -85 that didn't come with a half meg of memory.

    Not only has the rampant Tetris-playing caused my students to stop paying attention in class,

    Really? Students will pay attention in math class without TI-89s? That's surprising; I wouldn't think a lot of students would pay attention no matter what you did.

  42. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Corgha · · Score: 2

    If I recall correctly (it has been a while), one thing that always frustrated me about my physics and math courses is that they always seemed to want a numeric result at the end.

    I seem to remember that I would generally solve a problem symbolically down to the point where it was just a matter of arithmetic, at which point I would whip out the calcuator. That last step is really trivial, however, and if it weren't needed, neither would be the calculator.

    If calculators are such a problem, then why not just ban them?

  43. about the software piracy busts by awptic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well I tried submitting a story on this earlier, but it was rejected. Anyways, for some information on what went down from people who are closely involved with the scene, check out this site , a detailed list of who was involved and the 'warez groups' they came from is there, as well as locations.

    1. Re:about the software piracy busts by disc-chord · · Score: 1, Troll

      Way to go hot shot. It's bas enough the first poster names names.... it's doubly so with your link that even gives up Check Point. CP is closed for good now thanks to TTOL and people like you posting this crap to the public.

      You know TTOL was the ham that ZDTV busted live on TV 2 years ago for putting C&C 2: Tiberian sun up on an HTTP? Yea good company you keep buddy.

      Don't post private information to public web sites. What possible use does this info have to joe leecher? CP will be sorely missed, as a seconday casualty to this national tragedy.

    2. Re:about the software piracy busts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm not even part of the scene and even i know ttol is a moron.

    3. Re:about the software piracy busts by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Um, that wasn't private information. It popped right up on my browser, no password, no nothing. That was public information, same as this page. Heck, I could probably find it on Google.

      You warez d00dz wouldn't be settling for security through obscurity, would you? No wonder the Feds got you :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    4. Re:about the software piracy busts by athakur999 · · Score: 1
      "We at kamikaze are sending our kindest regards to those who have been affected by this tragic happening (everyone).
      Give me a break... If you play with fire, don't whine when you get burned. Tragic is 4000 people dying in NYC, people getting killed every day by drunk drivers, etc. Getting busted for doing something illegal doesn't quite fit my definition of "tragic."
      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  44. Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It just struck me WHY this happened now, to DoD! The group released less than 1% of total releases last year, but they were the ones behind the DeCSS algorithm (though not the code). They couldn't get anything out of punishing a 16 year old foreign national, so this is their tactic. There is no other reason for the FBI to target DoD over other groups with _much_ higher volume.

    Welcome to the Corporate Republic.

    --
    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    1. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by klocwerk · · Score: 1

      Except that they're one of the most high profile and vocal groups in warez, and have been for years.
      The Feds may not be stupid, but they are going to find the most obvious sources first.

      Not saying DeCSS had nothing to do with it, just that it may not be the whole shebang here.

      --

      "You worthless post!"
      -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    2. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by disc-chord · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nah if they wanted high profile and old then they would have tagged Razor or Rebels. Two of the oldest groups in the scene.

      If they wanted high profile and popular with the kiddies they would have hit Farilight.

      This DeCSS conspiracy makes a great deal of sense. Dezzy coded the DOD DVD Speed Ripper... and he was one of the guys the FBI named immediatly.

    3. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fairlight was on c64 (middle of c64 times) , Razor was on amiga... Who is older? guess?

      Too bad we dont have any more groups like Ikari Warriars or Triad, now those groups would be the oldest by far..

    4. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Triad still release demos on the C64, but AFAIK stopped all warez activities long ago. I was surprised that FLT was still in the game!

    5. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FLT is one of the biggest groups around today.

    6. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you dumb or just arithematically retarded?

      Flt nfo says = êÔÔÔÔ In Their 15th Year Of Glory, FairLight Released ÔÔÔÔÏ

      Rzr = "Since 1985"

      This year is 2001

      do the maths ;p

    7. Re:Not warez but DeCSS conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This certainly isn't the first crackdown, and I'm surprised that the BSA and FBI were so soft for the last few years. Back in my day (gad - you'd think I'm a grandpa...) I saw the fall of several guilds, although at the time they were BBS based, not internet based. Probably the best known guild in the late '70s was the Super Pirates of Minneapolis (SPM) who were shut down by the feds in the early '80s in an extremely well publicized crackdown.
      They were replaced by others in almost no time, though - I remember the PCPG (Pacific Coast Pirates Guild), MPG (Midwest Pirates Guild), and NDC (National Distributors Club) to name a few that came in to take up the slack. I doubt anyone who came from those guilds still pirates, though. The ones I knew are all PhDs in non-computer fields or, ironically, work for the same game companies they stole from when they were growing up...

      I think most pirates are extremely bright kids who really need something productive to focus their energies on. OTOH, Warez people aren't always as bright and certainly not as paranoid. I quit pirating and erased or gave away all my cracks and crack tools because a warez guy I knew (who could finger me as one of his sources) got caught with 100+ diskettes he brought to school and started bragging about... to a BSA person (official?) who was giving a speech there...

  45. real site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:real site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha the story about the guy getting fired after one day is funny. What an idiot. They where testing him to see if he would act professional or not. When your on your first day at work without signing a contract and they show you the "warez drop box" you're supposed say " hey thats illegal, i want no part of it" not "hey thats cool!". Haha, of course there gonna test ya, they don't want you turning their expensive systems into the next warez distro site.

    2. Re:real site by aka-ed · · Score: 1


      Site says, "Sorry this is down. F.B.I. call at my house (someone named Sharon) and ask me to kick it down (can't find how she got my number). Sorry, I can't host anymore, find someone else" So, did anyone archive the data before the downfall? Post it here, and let's see if "the FBI" (if that's who 'Sharon' really was) calls /.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  46. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by thebabelfish · · Score: 1

    Ahh, I agree. My HP 49g (the only HP calc in my school) is superior to my friends' TI's because of it's power and RPN entry system. We have great fun seeing who can do the largest computations and at least one of them really likes RPN. They still don't forgive me for being able to do 842! in ~15 seconds! Anyway, HP didn't stop production, only development; remember?

    --
    "I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
  47. My gawd that's a lot of warez by Chagrin · · Score: 3, Funny
    From Wired's take on the warez crackdown:
    • Investigators served 56 search warrants and expect to grab about 130 computers.

      Customs agent Allan Doody said each computer has between one to two terabytes of stolen software.

    --

    I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    1. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah duh, you don't get to be a topsite by hooking up your moms dell with the 60 gig ide drive to your at&t cable modem...

    2. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by nyquist_theorem · · Score: 2

      That sounds like another case of the feds "Mitnicking" again - arbitrarily multiplying the damage reports for the sake of making things sound more serious.

      1TB? come on. Maybe a seven drive external SCSI enclosure filled with 150GB drives. Otherwise, how would they do it? I'm no warez expert, how could you even get more than six 120GB HDs in a computer (assuming four IDE channels, a CDROM and a CDRW, leaving six free for those 120GB HDs... and four or five hundred CDRs besides?)

      A couple hundred megs, maybe. But I highly doubt more than a handful of those computers were terabyte plus capacity (one to two terabytes... as the original poster suggests). I don't condone warezing, but I don't want to see the kids get lynched for a billion dollars of theft, either.

      Typical sensationalism. I bet there's an awful lot of us that were at one point either FTP siteops or into the warez scene to some degree... its almost like a rite of passage for the internet-inclined. (donning flame suit)

      --
      -- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
    3. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by shepd · · Score: 5, Funny

      >Customs agent Allan Doody said each computer has between one to two terabytes of stolen software.

      Wow! If each software came on a CD-ROM, holding an average of 600 MB, that means each computer was surrounded by 3333 1/3 shoplifted products.

      Now, if each box is about 10" x 7" x 2", and your average room has a ceiling height of 8 ft. (96") then the room would have to be 83.3" x 58.3" (7' x 5').

      I guess that's why they busted universities. University dorm rooms are just about that size.

      Now, if each software was new when it was shoplifted, and if the average software costs $100, that's $333,333.33 of stealing each!

      What I don't get is why these stores were stupid enough not to notice 3333 software titles missing from the shelves.

      I guess we'll never know...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appereantly you have no clue...

      get two promise cards plus a 450watt supply and a motherboard with own raid.. that gives you ability to plugin around 16hds.. Each hd say is 80gb, going upwards 120. That is easily 1 to 2tb.. Just ensure you got fans for that, and you are set. And since most of these were ran from university racked servers no one was wiser to suspect a fridge sized computer to house warez..

      I know I have at home currently half a terabyte, and I dont run a site, just swap mp3s with friends, and am constantly running out of space. I think that by end of 2002 I will sport 750gb of space.

      in either case I see it a fairly normal thing for the sites to run that much

    5. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by kesuki · · Score: 1

      It really isn't hard to imagine at all. Promise sells controllers for up to 32 hot swapable drives. Keep in mind that not all of this 'software' was M$ windows etc. At least one of the computers contained 5000 movies. which is software or didn't you know that?

    6. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One major thing your forgetting... these are teenagers, how many teenagers have the money to afford this kind of hardware your talking about... back to reality, DOD had several terabyte sites that were busted, and most other sites were ~500gb ... nothing anywhere close to the 1-2TB that the feds posted each computer had.. and yes.. its a publicity stunt to make software pirates out to be worse than murderers and rapists ...

    7. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where did you get the impression any of these people where teenagers?

    8. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called sarcasm.

      He was trying to be funny.

    9. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by don.g · · Score: 1

      As another poster said, Promise IDE controllers can handle it. I've heard of a someone who has/had a linux box with at around 7 HDDs in it as their fileserver - the ones that wouldn't fit in the bays were strapped in with cable ties and the like, IIRC.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    10. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, me and 2 friends of mine run a FTP server with accts for a few warez/VCD groups and they've repeatedy offered arrays in the 2-6TB range. It appears that they have an arranagement with someone powerful in Hong Kong and can/will ship gear like that whenever they want it. We've declined all offers ( don't like being tied in with these guys that much ). On our own, we've scraped together ~400GB from hardware we had. It's really not all that hard nor expensive to do.

    11. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like another case of the feds "Mitnicking" again - arbitrarily multiplying the damage reports for the sake of making things sound more serious.

      1TB? come on. Maybe a seven drive external SCSI enclosure filled with 150GB drives. Otherwise, how would they do it? I'm no warez expert, how could you even get more than six 120GB HDs in a computer (assuming four IDE channels, a CDROM and a CDRW, leaving six free for those 120GB HDs... and four or five hundred CDRs besides?)

      A couple hundred megs, maybe. But I highly doubt more than a handful of those computers were terabyte plus capacity (one to two terabytes... as the original poster suggests). I don't condone warezing, but I don't want to see the kids get lynched for a billion dollars of theft, either.

      Typical sensationalism. I bet there's an awful lot of us that were at one point either FTP siteops or into the warez scene to some degree... its almost like a rite of passage for the internet-inclined. (donning flame suit)


      I think a terrabye or two is reasonable. What they're probably counting is installed size. Typically, you can download something well under a 100 MB. By the time you get done unzipping, unraring, unacing, running the mp3 -> wav converters, and any other bundled warez utilz you can top 500 megs easy. With a 5:1 compression ratio, you could easily have a 'terrabye' of warez on a couple of 100Gig drives... So, while they probably are Mitnicking it, they can probably (at least to themselves and their superiors) justify it.

      T

    12. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      It's called sarcasm.

      He was trying to be funny.

    13. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tell me how can a teenager be an admin of IT at MIT?

      Tell me how can teenagers be engineers at Intel (previous FBI bust involved PWA, in case you forgot)

      Tell me how can teenagers understand encryption, do USB dongle emulators, or something sounding trivial like Keygens?

      teenagers my ass...

    14. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me how can teenagers understand encryption, do USB dongle emulators, or something sounding trivial like Keygens?



      Thanks, man

    15. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by psychosystem · · Score: 1

      Yes, my ASUS mobo has the normal 4 IDE channels, plus it has 2 more ide ports (capable of raid1 :)) making for a total of 8 ide hdds onboard... add another promise ide controller (pci) and you can add another 4 hdds. You can go on and on... plus external (firewire/usb) hdds, and the possibilities are endless...

      BUT, I also highly doubt each pc had over a TB of warez on it. That's just a preposterous number. People would archive to CD before it got that big. HDD's do cost money, after all, and so do all those promise ide controllers... and a large part of the juarez scene is not having to pay for shit... lol

      --
      This is my Sig.
    16. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      BUT, I also highly doubt each pc had over a TB of warez on it. That's just a preposterous number. People would archive to CD before it got that big.
      Exactly. I'll bet they were referring to the total amount of data amassed. A couple of shelves of CDs is easily a terabyte, and I've heard stories of war3z/m0v13 d00dz with huge shelves stuffed full of CDs. Data builds up quickly when you've got the cable modem and both the DSLs maxed out 24x7...
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    17. Re:My gawd that's a lot of warez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called sarcasm.

      He was trying to be funny.

      Note: I am also being sarcastic and +1 funny.

  48. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    I'm sorry, but I draw the "geekiness" line at pissing away your time writing silly crap like that for a calculator.

    A large part of hacking is making something that's not meant to do cool stuff do cool stuff. Are you suggesting that hacking isn't geeky?

    It has gotten so far that we have had to require that only scientific calculators be used on the upcoming midterm exams.

    So? There's no reason high school math students need graphing calculators. In fact, with the possible exception of Trig functions, they shouldn't need calculators at all. As a college level math tutor I think it's unfortunate that high school math teachers encourage the use of calculators. I've watched too many freshman flounder in Calculus because they never really understood Algebra. That's certainly not entirely because their high school teachers let them use calculators, but it's certainly a contributing factor. It's really sad to see someone who claimed to get A's in math all through high school who can't even multiply by 10's without picking up their calculator.

    On an unrelated note, why don't you write about HP calculators some time? They are far superior from a technological and software standpoint, and RPN works a lot better than standard algebraic notation.

    That would explain their popularity, or lack thereof. Personally I despise RPN, for the same reasons I despise Newtons notations for Calculus. Oh well, I guess if your going to be wrong you might as well be wrong about everything...

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  49. Tetris in class and notetaking by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Not only has the rampant Tetris-playing caused my students to stop paying attention in class

    Then don't allow your students to bring Game Boy units to class. The only handheld units that can run Tetris® brand products are Game Boy, Game Boy Pocket, Game Boy Color, and Game Boy Advance. No TI, HP, or Casio calculator has a Tetris product available. The closest equivalents to "Tetris" on TI-89 are Jetris, Queue, etc. Of course, there are also Nibbles, SameGame, Dr. M****, and P*c-M*n.

    but the ability to store "notes" in the calculator is a major source of cheating on tests

    Bull. If your students (like supabeast!) use their calcs as a mnemonic aid for formulas, the problem lies not necessarily in the calcs but perhaps in the tests themselves. Design the tests to require a higher level of thought than simple recall (such as the ability to comprehend, apply, or analyze the underlying mathematics), and don't let them use cable or IR links during the test.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Tetris in class and notetaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you stupid? there is a 68k tetris program by jimmy mardell for the 89 that is PERFECT, better than tetris brand

      and PalmOS has an official tetris version produced for it, and its a handheld

    2. Re:Tetris in class and notetaking by yerricde · · Score: 1

      are you stupid? there is a 68k tetris program by jimmy mardell for the 89 that is PERFECT, better than tetris brand

      I wasn't saying there wasn't a good tetrisclone. I was just saying there wasn't Tetris®.

      and PalmOS has an official tetris version produced for it, and its a handheld

      Sorry; I wasn't aware of it.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
  50. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by kenthorvath · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of course you can do 842 calculations in 15 seconds if you mindlessly press 2 [ENTER] 2+2+ 2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2... I mean how hard is that? But I find that the CAS in the HP series could use some SERIOUS work. I hate that damn equation editor. I hate the stupid menus that you need to do almost everything. My TI-89 can handle things just fine. If you happen to have a short term memory and can't figure out where to put your parenthesis they make PRETTY PRINT for that! I admit that RPN has some nice features and that yes, the 49G can switch between the two systems, but c'mon the 89 is at least as technically advanced as the 49G.

  51. Your country sucks by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is why America is falling apart. Because the FBI are spending all their time tracking down non-physical data that has no real-world value apart from that put on it by big corporations. Shouldn't they be figuring out how to stop people getting past their crappy airline security instead, or is money more important? no, money is more important.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Your country sucks by melrose · · Score: 1

      You may think of it only as stolen software, but stealing software affects the corporations who develop it, the income of those people who work at the corporation who will lose their jobs and incomes if the software is not 'purchased' etc etc etc. It may not be global terrorism, but it is still a crime.

    2. Re:Your country sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the FBI are spending all their time tracking down non-physical data that has no real-world value apart from that put on it by big corporations.

      No real world value? So, I suppose all those guys who had to be paid to write all that stolen software don't count. Do you know how much it costs to develop software? For your average game, it costs *millions* of US$. Just because the end product isn't physically tangible like a bar of gold or something doesn't mean it has no real world value. If it has no value, then WHY DO YOU WANT IT IN THE FIRST PLACE? Because you want it, and because it cost money to produce, it has value.

      Why don't you go write your own damn software for a living, and tell me if you think it has value after a year of solid programming work. Especially after some fuck cracks it and puts it up on a warez site for all the cheapass motherfuckers like you to steal.

    3. Re:Your country sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does copyright infringing hurt companies if you do it only to later be able to claim that you did infringe?

      people who infringe for profit, now those should be jailed, but what about those who do it for fun?

    4. Re:Your country sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, millions of dollars are spent on a single game which came out like shit which doesn't deserved the funding or the money from the consumer. Better yet, those money should have gone to the charity. Take Daikatana for example..

    5. Re:Your country sucks by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Goddam Christ on a fucking cracker!

      Calling this post flamebait? The moderator who did this crap should have his IP fucking banned. The trouble is this isn't exceptional...I won't go into some of the genuinely stupid moderations done on my posts lately...the moderation system needs some real fixes, pronto.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  52. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    kill yourself

  53. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Bodero · · Score: 3, Funny
    I understand your frustration with calculator games in high school math. I believe my high school teacher put it best, however, in regards to what goes on in his class:

    "I don't care what you do, as long as you don't disturb others. Paint your nails or sleep for all I care. While you're in summer school, I'll be teeing off on the golf course at 9am."

  54. Legality by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Informative

    >such as agents raiding a house and watching what connections happened without pulling the plug. That can't be legal, can it

    By what logic? They are observing illegal activity taking place. They did not put up the site, they did not instigate people to use it, it's not entrapment.

    That's like saying watching a drug transaction go down to find out who is involved instead of stopping it is illegal.

    1. Re:Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI and the even the cops always did this. When they bust a drug dealer they take his beeper and cell phone and try to set up deals with the people who call.

    2. Re:Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Operation bandwidth sounds a lot like entrapment to me.

    3. Re:Legality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did put up a site though...
      According to the DoJ article, they've been running one for a couple years. Sounds kind of like the government trafficking drugs into the country to catch some street dealers.

  55. Good honest New Zealand journalism. by PlazMatiC · · Score: 1

    The New Zealand Herald's article on the whole warez crackdown is nothign short of awful.

    It's a typical case of a clueless reporter trying to write an article on a technological issue they have no clue about.

    For example:

    US law enforcement officials said the raids targeted the "Warez" network, which breaks copy-protection schemes on everything from movies like Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone to computer operating systems like Microsoft Windows XP.

    and

    The US Customs Service said the ring was responsible for 95 per cent of all pirated software available online, causing at least $US1 billion ($2.38 billion) in lost sales annually.

    I guess now that there's no more warez, we'll have to rely on juarez for our pirated software?

    1. Re:Good honest New Zealand journalism. by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, now that the source of 95% of the world's online pirated software has been shut down, big-name software companies will no doubt be dropping their exorbitant pricing -- the justification for which was the rate of online piracy.

      Right?

      *cough*

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Mirror of warez list by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2

    Here's another site that has a list much like cyberworld.ru:

    http://phlow.digimagix.org/scenebusts.htm

  58. uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wether you hate warez of love em, i think everyone is gonna agree, the fed should be worrying about alot more important crap, like oh i donno maybe TERRORISTS.

  59. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's no reason high school math students need graphing calculators. In fact, with the possible exception of Trig functions, they shouldn't need calculators at all. As a college level math tutor I think it's unfortunate that high school math teachers encourage the use of calculators. I've watched too many freshman flounder in Calculus because they never really understood Algebra. That's certainly not entirely because their high school teachers let them use calculators, but it's certainly a contributing factor. It's really sad to see someone who claimed to get A's in math all through high school who can't even multiply by 10's without picking up their calculator.

    Amen! I've seen a student who claimed to have gotten straight A's in AP calc get a C followed by an F in first year calculus. He told me ``...if I could just use my calculator, I'd be fine...''. He was partly right; he did know what buttons to push for some familiar problems. But he had never learned calculus, and he had never learned how to learn math. All he knew was how to push buttons, and learn button sequences. He couldn't reason.

  60. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by cockeater · · Score: 0

    Hey, I wrote my first DDoS scripts on an 83. Never underestimate the value of a good education.

  61. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by thebabelfish · · Score: 1

    Of course you can do 842 calculations...

    842! is not the same as doing 2+2+2+2+2... 842 times. It is doing 1*2*3...840*841*842. If my reasoning is right, it involves 841 calculations. There is a difference.

    But I find that the CAS in the HP series could use some SERIOUS work. I hate that damn equation editor. I hate the stupid menus that you need to do almost everything.

    So far, my only complaint with the CAS is that it doesn't understand that 2x and 2*x are equal. What "serious work" does it need? As for the equation writer, I find it useful for writing big/long equations and seeing what an equation looks like as it shows in pretty print. You can set it up so that most areas by default show equations in pretty print. As for the menus, I assume you mean the pain in the neck "windowed choose boxes". I hate them as well, but you can (and I did) flip a flag so that the calc uses only the "soft menus" (at the bottom of the screen, accessed by the F1-F6 keys).

    but c'mon the 89 is at least as technically advanced as the 49G.

    I'm not trying to bash the 89, it is a good calculator, but IMHO I find the 49g to be slightly better because of RPN, RPL (Reverse Polish Lisp), and the ability to rotate 3D graphs in realtime (unlike the 89 which can't do realtime rotation).

    --
    "I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
  62. Pisses me OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cant believe this. I dont get it. Ok now that its harder to get warez do they think they stoped it. I mean comon, a few months down the line and it will be back up, then they go and spend millions to track these people down to have them back up again, and again, and again. You cant stop them for fucks sake, put your money and effort into something better.

    One more thing: If there is no more warez does that mean I get my software for cheaper now. I mean software is so high because of warez, so I am gessing I can get the latest game for, umm, lets see, $10 right, I mean no more warez, not as much pay.

    YEAH RIGHT

  63. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by QuasEye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's interesting you said that. Back when I was in high school, I took the "Independent Study" Calculus course. It was the only one my school offered, and I was one of three who took it. I took the whole thing on a beat-up TI scientific that a friend of mine had found laying outside on the ground. It was so old, it had batteries only - no solar. Anyway, later that year, I took the Calc AP test. The rules said that a graphing calculator was recommended, but my math teacher said it would probably just get in my way. The morning of the test, my calculator died - big crack through the LCD. The guidance counselor lent me his calculator - a four-function. Ok, it had a square root button too, but that was it. I took the whole test with it, and had to leave a lot of the answers in symbolic form - I think I gave the height of a tree as ln(3.8) + 2 or something.

    Anyway, long story short, I got a 4 - first at my high school ever to pass.

    So, in conclusion, symbolic answers can be a good thing. :)

  64. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So if all your students have stopped paying attention in your class, maybe rather than blaming the easy to blame calculator games, you should look at yourself and how you're teaching them.......


    Nonsense. Teaching does not involve pumping things into the heads of passive students. That isn't possible in the first place. Neither does teaching involve entertainment.


    You can expect a teacher to let you know what you should learn, point you to information, and perhaps give some pointers to undertanding, some examples and maybe even (in undergraduate classes) some hints about what is going to be on the test. If you want your education to be entertaining, stay home and watch Sesame street.


    If you can't find something interesting in a subject, any subject at all, then you probably are not a very interesting person. When I was little, I complained that I was bored, and my grandmother told me that boredom was an infallible sign of stupidity. I've decided that she was right. A stupid person is bored whenever no-one is entertaining him. An interesting person will interest himself in the things around him, perhaps even in a lecture about how to pass a test!


    In short, the problem with most teachers is not in how they teach, but rather in the fact that most of their students belong outside with a pick and shovel, rather than inside with a calculator and tetris clone.

  65. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't know about your ability to bore students, but there are ways to teach that keep us deliquent geeks attentive. Try to reach them where they are. Give them a reason to pay attention.

    You have to be pretty stupid to pass up a chance to learn. Some one who needs a reason to pay attention doesn't belong in school.
    Come back when you're 40; most folks have gotten over their superiority complexes by then and are ready to learn. Some of my most interested students have been older than me, but few have been younger.
  66. calculator pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, anybody have any of the inappropriate content? Did any of it involve nudity?

  67. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by sbeitzel · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, in the calculus class I'm taking (final's tomorrow) we're using graphing calculators to help visualize what we're doing. The instructor uses a TI 89, and most of the other students do as well, but I had fond memories of my HP-11C so I went out and bought an HP 49G. So now I've just spent several months observing some differences between the TI and the HP. And guess what? The TI does almost everything the HP does (no RPN that I've seen on the TI, and I must admit that that's one of my favorite things) and the TI has a nicer interface. Frankly, it's a Pain In The Ass to use the HP -- what takes maybe three keystrokes on the TI can take six or more on the HP. Feh. I love my HP geek toy, but I can see why people prefer the TI.

    --
    Oh, go on, check out my job.
  68. Games on the TI by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me to be a decent way to learn a little programming. The fact that you can carry it around with you and whenever you are bored whip it out and code a few more lines is a plus factor, not like my computer where when I sit down on it there's a lot more to do that distracts me from ever learning how to program on it...

    The whole point of hacking is to make things work above their abilities. I wrote a multiplayer Tic Tac Toe type game for the TI-83 that worked over the link cable, which was pretty cool. (Turns out though that the link cable connection isn't good enough to do anything requiring speed or anything close to two way communication, so any multiplayer action type games are out...)

    For a lark I am now programming a 3D Wireframe Renderer for my TI-83. It reads XYZ points from a matrix variable and then reads which points to connect with lines from another matrix variable. It is pretty cool, not useful for anything, but still cool.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  69. Shouldn't the FBI be chasing terrorists? by Lobsang · · Score: 1

    Instead of 31337 W4R3Z D00dZ? I suppose there's better use of the taxpayers money than busting down teenagers that pirate games. While a lot of time is devoted to these kids, the real bad guys are out there, planning, learning to fly...

    1. Re:Shouldn't the FBI be chasing terrorists? by NickV · · Score: 1

      Instead of 31337 W4R3Z D00dZ? I suppose there's better use of the taxpayers money than busting down teenagers that pirate games. While a lot of time is devoted to these kids, the real bad guys are out there, planning, learning to fly...

      Ah.. more slashdot hypocrisy at it's finest. We complain when the FBI busts warez sites instead of focusing on terrorists, but then we ALSO complain when the DoJ focuses on terrorists and not Microsoft.

    2. Re:Shouldn't the FBI be chasing terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the real FBI agents are probably busy investigating them. Meanwhile the computer techy FBI guys can sit there and catch the pirates. And the tuxedoed FBI guys with British accents (no idea why) can go and catch the Russian spies who weren't planning to crash a plane but are still always up to something eeeevil. And the newbie FBI guys can keep on making the coffee and typing up the reports and falling victim to the usual first day FBI pranks.

      I don't think we should blame the FBI for having to chase the pirates as well as the terrorists. I mean, after all, it's the pirates' fault for NOT going out there, planning, learning to fly and so on, in the first place!

    3. Re:Shouldn't the FBI be chasing terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you where an FBI agent what would you rather do?

      Go undercover and infiltrate the mob and risk getting murdered to try and maybe charge a bunch of roughnecks that won't snitch each other out and will probably go free becuase of good lawyers...

      Or sit at home on with a government payed for leased line and a terabyte of disk getting free movies and games uploaded to you for two years and then finally go and pust some poor college kids with no lawyers who are so geeky they snitch out all their friends for a plea bargain that he could have walked on if he had a good lawyer to begin with...

      gee tough choice...

  70. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Rain · · Score: 1

    I agree to a point--my high-school physics teacher, one of maybe 6 good teachers in the whole school, allowed both numeric and symbolic answers. If you forgot your calculator for a test, or you just wanted to avoid another possible place to err, you were in luck. He also gave partial credit for problems that were partially right--this might not sound like much, but it's certainly better than "I don't know what I'm teaching syndrome," where you get no credit for a large problem if the final answer doesn't match what's a teacher's manual.

    I also have exactly the same problem has supabeast--I can plow through almost any sort of math you want to throw at me if I have sufficient reference. I did terribly in my higher math classes because of this, and also because of the fact that two of the three math teachers simply could not teach. One of them actually managed to somehow shut one of her breasts in her desk drawer once--sure, accidents happen, and I've done some awfully stupid things, but this wasn't far from the norm. (This is the same teacher with a phobic disorder involving raisins)

    Anyway, back on topic--I'm not a huge fan of banning anything, but I could live with it if symbolic answers were allowed and at least an equation reference was provided. I really don't think students should be required to memorize for almost the sole purpose of forgetting them. Ask a handful of people who have been out of the educational arena for a year to give you a handful of the equations they were forced to memorize during the schooling; I'm willing to wager the majority by far would have a very hard time unless they were mathematicians or decent math teachers.

  71. Oh please by jkovach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like it or not, copying commercial software is ILLEGAL. Although I agree that today's software licensing situation is beyond ridiculous, that methods used by the industry to calculate losses to "piracy" straight out of la-la land, and that small-scale piracy of products such as Windows 2000 have helped companies such as MS by letting would-be MCSE's get more practice, the laws currently on the books and the decisions currently being made by the courts say that unauthorized distribution of commerical software is copyright infringement and that such infringement is illegal.

    This isn't about outlawing Linux or personal firewalls. This isn't about invasion of privacy. This isn't about the legal grey area that is file sharing software. This isn't about arresting Torvalds or raiding Transmeta. This is simply the police doing their job, enforcing well-understood and court-tested laws in what appears to be a very well-planned sting operation.

    If you think that improvements in motor vehicle technology mean that 65 mph speed limits are too slow, you don't drive 120 and then expect people to listen to you when you are locked up for reckless driving. Similarly, you don't distribute warez and then go whining about censorship and the like once the law catches up with you. You won't get any points for calling it civil disobedience either, because you know full well that these people weren't doing this for the greater good, they were doing it because they wanted Photoshop for free.

    Yeah, it sucks. But, as they say, if you don't want to do the time, don't do the crime. Besides, it's not like the police did anything new. Undercover cops posed as warez kiddies much as undercover cops have posed as drug dealers and prostitutes in the real world. With all the security technology out there, if warez kiddies couldn't avoid falling into a trap as simple as this, did they really deserve to survive?

  72. RIP by beefstu01 · · Score: 1

    Rest in Peace Drink or Die and Razor. You will not be forgotten soon. The wonderful thing about this is that the feds still haven't pulled two of the biggest cracking orgs around. Their names are not to be mentioned, just to send a finger to the FBI. So fear not! There will still be quality warez distributed. Actually, I think that the people that weren't taken down will actually join other groups. There is no way that the feds can stop warez- its impossible. Find one way to crack down on warez, and there will be people to find another way.

    Isn't America Grand?

    1. Re:RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right, its not like the others groups have not disbanded

    2. Re:RIP by uebernewby · · Score: 2

      You're actually quite right. I've downloaded warez quite often (with so much crap going about, according to my own dubious morals it's perfectly ok to check out "extended" demos before buying software)and the names on the list mean squat to me. These are not the people who have ripped any game, graphic app or audio app I've ever seen, and as for movies and mp3's, a lot of those are ripped by ordinary home users who rent or buy cd's and dvd's, encode them for their own personal use and then share them. So what makes these groups special, I don't know. Maybe they were just easy to bust...

      --

      News and bla for computer musicians: http://lomechanik.net/
    3. Re:RIP by uebernewby · · Score: 2

      sorry to reply to my own post, but it just occured to me to ask if someone knows whether these are the groups that crack Windows/Office/etc?. (now there's software I'll just buy, because even though it's crap I know for sure I need it).

      --

      News and bla for computer musicians: http://lomechanik.net/
    4. Re:RIP by beefstu01 · · Score: 1

      Si si- Razor and DoD were both groups that made high quality cracks of Windows/Office/etc... I actually know a buddy of mine who has the DoD versions of Win 95, 98, 2000, Me and XP. Razor mainly concentrated on games, but I think they were the ones who did Maya and some Photoshops. I have seen many different people do cracks for these, but the Warez community won't see as many releases now, because they just busted one of the biggest (in amount of people and respect) cracking orginizations.

  73. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    I understand your concern, my school has to battle the same problem. But the teachers have the stance that if they pass the test, they don't seem to fuss. I'd see the previous post about summer school.

    Seriously, before a midterm or regents, the teacher in one menu managed to reset the calculator. It wipes out the notes (and games, darn), and resets things like radians, but is the only foolproof thing when everyone's in the test room. Just check inside the cases for cheat sheets.

  74. this isnt the first time this happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure this is probably the biggest bust like it. But remember a few years back 1999 i think people from a couple rip groups mainly Paradigm members got raided and busted. That was a little blip, but it blew over and things where back to normal in like a week. This will blow over. It's like trying to stop drugs or something, it's impossible to stop. Does this incident suck though? well ya, don't get me wrong, but things will continue on in time. I wouldn't be suprised to see razor bust back on the scene with some big release like 2 years from now after this blows over.

  75. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by dregoth · · Score: 1

    As a high school student, I remember the first games to come out for the TI-85. Yeah I played them in classes when they were boring. I also had lots of fun programming on that TI-85. Me and my friends would see how could write the fastest, shortest math program. I got some programming experience on that calculator during boring math classes. With the calculator you can do some amazing things that would not be possible with just pencil and paper. Any teacher that is afraid of them and wants to take that away from their students is an utter fool.

    As fair as puting the equations and notes in their calculator, when in real life as a programmer would you not look up something if you were unsure? Forcing the memozing of math formulas is counter productive and takes away from grading their ability to *USE* them instead of just spit them back at you with little thought. Physics courses that use calculus always give you the formulas. They don't rely on grading your ability to recall obsure equations, but to be able to use them correctly.

  76. Re:Snotback: Snotto, Snotz, Snottion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know, every time i read this i want to punch you more and more. the taco snotting thing is old, lame, boring, and over done. it never was remotely funny or good though. it sounds like a 10th grader wrote it too. so please, go play in traffic or shut the fuck up so real trolls can post.

  77. calculators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you weenies using calculators to help you in calculus are a bunch of fucking panzies. Newton didn't use some fucking panzy graphing calculator. What school lets you use a fucking calculator on a math test thats lame as hell. What schools are these? Some public school in the south bronx? or some football and beer party college? you guys suck.

  78. Rebels PC are namethieves.. by Alta0001 · · Score: 1

    Claiming to be same as the old Amiga group. Rebels PC is fairly new in the scene, can't be older than 1992.. Besides, the Amiga group was into demo creation and not warezing. Funny thing is M:et had a strange story he told everyone about founding Rebels but he didn't join until 1989. When Rebels was founded M:et was in a no-name group named Neutron Dance or something like that. M:et was however a member of Rebels [Amiga] for a limited time. The founding members of Rebels Amiga were originally from the two groups Chaos Cooperation and Roadrunners and are as follows (taken from "ON THE WHEELS OF STEEL" scrolltext): BJ, Codex, Pac-Man (Cruncher), Droopy, Jake, Jason, Joz, OBX, Raz, Static, Thrasher, Vandal, Xod and Yoyo. Besides, busting a group named "Drink Or Die" makes for better headlines than a group like "Rebels". I am sure they have marketing people at FBI too, they are in executive positions everywhere!

  79. No UBL news today...why? by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2

    I was kind of wondering what the general feeling about the lack of discussion on the video today. I feel that while /.'ers can tire very quickly of hearing (not caring) about UBL, having the video and transcrpits online along without having the servers get overloaded was IMHO newsworth for us. Another reason I have been apart of the slashdot community is because this forum has the background to make intelligent comments, rather than the shit that gets posted everywhere else.

    --
    "Get them before they get....
  80. Re:Snotback: Snotto, Snotz, Snottion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty much everytime i read slashdot i am overcome with the urge to punch people in the face. Most of the people are fucking total morons. They are totaly lost in a maze of FUD and misconceptions with no chance of escape and they will not allow themselves to be led out of it. Then the people that aren't morons have massive delusions of grandeur and think they are fucking Euclid reborn or something, which still leads to face punching urges. The best way to avoid this problem is to quit slashdot today!I am a recovering Slashdotter in the midst of a relapse do to all the busts. Trust me if you quit you will have more free time you will learn more, have more skills, and spend significantly less time per day annoyed by idiocy. Ok i have to put an end to this binge. Good day.

  81. Banco! (del Mutuo Soccorso!) by mbourgon · · Score: 2

    Sorry, had to do it. Oblink for them:

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/arti st /glance/-/88810/ref=m_art_dp/107-0093169-3520543

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  82. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a former mathematics teacher. You should be. Let me pick your post apart line by line. I'll be quite harsh, so stop reading now if you don't want your day ruined...

    I'm sorry, but I draw the "geekiness" line at pissing away your time writing silly crap like that for a calculator.
    Do you think it's silly for football players to lift weights because there are no weights on the football field? Learning to program in a small space develops excellent mental muscles. Learning to program in Z80 assembler (or whatever language is used) is invaluable to ANYONE who wants to understand computers. YOU don't see the usefulness in it, therefore you conclude it's pointless; I must disagree. I'd point out also (something that you as a teacher MUST come to understand) that anything that motivates a student to learn something, ANYTHING, is invaluable.

    A calculator is a tool of science and business, not a gaming machine.
    Ever hear of a computer? Ever hear of the IBM PC? Speak of facts, not wishes.

    I cannot begin to describe the problems that it has caused me as a high-school math teacher.
    Yes, you can. You go on to do so in the next sentence. It would have been better to say "I can only begin to describe..."

    Not only has the rampant Tetris-playing caused my students to stop paying attention in class, but the ability to store "notes" in the calculator is a major source of cheating on tests.
    You have a classroom management problem. The game-playing and cheating are symptomatic. It could be note-passing, it could be talking, it could be throwing pencils at the ceiling. The problem is not the paper, the mouths, or the pencils, it is the students' lack of respect and motivation. Like it or not, responsibility (if not causation) lies with you. Students play games because they have nothing better to do. As for the cheating, you make it sound as if you didn't understand the potential of these "tools", and I have no patience with this. You have no business teaching with them if you don't understand them. I worked with some of the early pioneers of the graphing calculator in secondary mathematics education, and rapidly learned that a teacher who didn't understand the technology would do more harm than good. Students would not only fail to progress in their mathematical skills; they would regress as they lost competence in skills they'd previously developed.

    It has gotten so far that we have had to require that only scientific calculators be used on the upcoming midterm exams.
    More evidence that you have NO business teaching with graphing calculators. You apparently hand students a tool, teach them to use it, and test them on their ability to accomplish tasks without the tool. You may as well teach them to do long division with paper and pencil and require oral examiniations in which they do all the work in their head. The analogy is almost exact. Here's what we did to solve your problem. On test days...
    1. Students place all books under the desk as class starts; only the calculator and some writing implements are on the desk.
    2. Students remove batteries from the calculators.
    3. The teacher walks to each desk and verifies that the batteries are out.
    4. The students replace batteries and place calculators under their desk.
    5. The teacher passes out Part 1 of the test; it measures rote memorization of formulas, proofs, etc. This portion of the test is timed.
    6. When Part 1 is completed, the teacher passes out Part 2; students could use their calculators.
    This worked quite well for us.

    On an unrelated note, why don't you write about HP calculators some time?
    I believe they have...

    They are far superior from a technological and software standpoint, and RPN works a lot better than standard algebraic notation.
    Right, and Esperanto is far superior from a linguistic standpoint and works better than standard English phonics. But no one speaks Esperanto at my supermarket because everyone speaks English. RPN is a poor choice in a pedagogical environment because you must teach not one, but two mathematical languages. If you want to teach RPN, by all means do so..but teach only RPN and use textbooks whose notation makes RPN obvious.

    Alas, I suppose now that HP's discontinuing them, they don't matter to the Slashdot crowd anymore...
    Not a homogenous group...but you're probably mostly correct.

    Some of this has been pointed out in other posts, but I wanted to be thorough. BTW, I'm a former mathematics teacher because I was a bad mathematics teacher. I loved mathematics, I loved my students, and I loved being in the classroom. I just really, really sucked at it. Anyway, I can see the symptoms from a thousand miles. You really need to either leave the field (as I did) or seek some drastic change to your teaching. A few years reflection on my failure has lead me t believe that classroom management (aka discipline) skills are the core competencies of good teachers.

  83. Warez Culture & Movies. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    First: With so many groups with such great organization and skills (obviously more than some software makers) this is part of our culture. If you agree with their actions or not - you must realize these could be the Al Capone & Baby Face Nelsons of our time.

    Do they really have the press conference saying:
    "Today a judge issued warrants for John Smith also known as; Arsdigi..."
    and so forth?

    That has to be a riot to the persons parents or whoever. They all know he just sits in his house all day.

  84. Re:I hate.. by kko · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dude! I just hate Jon Katz....

    --
    No, seriously, I just come here for the articles.
  85. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2

    I don't know if the parent of this comment was intended to be funny or not. I didn't find it funny.

    I'd just like to make a distinction between writing silly games for your calculator, and cheating in class.

    I had a great time programming my TI-85 and TI-82 when I was in my high school math classes, I never once used them to cheat, and I went on to major in Math in college. Lots of my other friends played with them when they were bored, but didn't ever cheat. Sure, sometimes we didn't pay attention to the lecture - but we wouldn't have been paying attention to the lecture without a calculator either - often we figured out what was going on in the first 10 minutes of class and were bored, while all of the other students were still struggling.

    My suggestion is this: encourage use of graphing calculators to understand math. Tolerate use of calculators during class (but take them away from any students who abuse this privelege). Disallow them during exams.

    One other suggestion: if you're a Math teacher, take the time to learn how to use these calculators. If you suspect a student of cheating, take their calculator and examine it for notes. If you want to be fair, you'll tell your students about this policy ahead of time.

  86. Good honest (NON-)New Zealand journalism. by don.g · · Score: 2, Informative

    You didn't notice the attribution to Reuters at the bottom of that story? That's not NZ journalism.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  87. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by BryceH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the ability to store "notes" in the calculator is a major source of cheating on tests

    dont let the students use calculators on exams. my best courses were the ones where we were not alowed to use calculators on exams. the problems used easy enough numbers that you didnt get caught up with number crunching on the calc. but you had to demonstrate a clear understanding of the material in order to get a correct answer. if you ask me most people use calculators far far to much for simple problems and they are so reliant on the calculator that they never really stop to think about the problem. or they are so trusting of the calculator that they make stupid typos and never catch them. for example take 100/10=? someone types 100/100 in to the calculator on accident they get 1 as the answer and just write it down. they never think about the problem.

    --
    "Shut up brain or ill stab you with a Q-tip" Homer Simpson
  88. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

    You have to be pretty stupid to pass up a chance to learn. Some one who needs a reason to pay attention doesn't belong in school.
    Come back when you're 40; most folks have gotten over their superiority complexes by then and are ready to learn. Some of my most interested students have been older than me, but few have been younger.


    Looks like your superiority complex is still alive and kickin'...

  89. Re:I hate.. by Grahf · · Score: 1

    I don't even know who timothy is, but I must agree.

  90. FBI infiltration. by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Am I the only one who noticed one key thing in all those Raid's? How the FBI got so far into the scene? Now its not like you can goto www.warez.com and find links to a DOD / Razor FTP site! The only way to get there is by TRADING. From that link, apparently certain sites were actually FED sites! Think about it, how many hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of software did the fed's trade to catch those few groups? :)

    Regardless, this is not going to dent the warez scene at all, maybe a slight slow-down but it will be back bigger and better! Maybe more lame groups tho. But one thing, from now it will be much harder to catch them! A previous posters parallels with Drugs is appropriate, zero-tolerance policy doesnt work, as soon as you catch one big drug dealer another three take his place!

    (Sorry almost Redundant, this i touched on in another reply, but i think its worth more thought)

  91. The mexican banking system... by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... has been a mess since it was nationalized in 1982. Basically, one day all the investments companies like Bank Of America and Citi had in Mexico back then was for all practical purposes stolen, and the country paid the price for the next 15 years - no investment institutions would do business there no matter how good the odds were.

    Things have gotten better over the last few years, where now they're at the point of allowing foreign companies to acquire what was once the "pride" of the mexican financial system, Banamex (mentioned in the article). The problem is that Banamex was supremely in bed with the ruling party, and thus it can still do whatever the heck it pleases. Having said that, US law should hopefully shoot them down in this sad case.

    FWIW, the mexican 'fed' is technically not the Banco De Mexico, but the board of governors headed by the Minister of Finance and the governor of the bank itself. For many years this 'bank' was really just a money production factory, back in the golden days of the banana republic mindset when the government printed more money if it suddenly ran out for some reason. 40% inflation baby!

  92. Mod parent up [nt] by Bishop · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Parent article should not have been modded as flamebait.

  93. Mob Thoughts of Copywrite Law by kc0dxh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There seems to be some confusion on when copywrite and license violation should be enforced. The greatest crime agains humanity is transgressing GPL. On the other hand, defending ones ability to breach copywrite and licensing is a noble task.

    I submit that these are contrarian concepts and that greater thought should be applied. For what is a law without proper enforcement?

    _____
    ::Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow. It empties today of its strength. --Corrie TenBoom

    --

    --- "1.21 Jigawatts!" -Doc

  94. Languages by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    TI calculators are programmed either in TI-BASIC, which you only need the calculator to do, or in assembly, but then you need the Computer to Calculator Link Cable and some special software.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  95. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell are you even allowing calculators? What it will kill them to have to use the stuff between those ears? Only geeks talk about HP stuff. Normal people avoid it.

  96. David LaMacchia precedent by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In 1995 David LaMacchia, a student at MIT, was cleared of federal (US) wire fraud charges. The charges were brought because LaMacchia was operating two bulletin boards to distribute pirated software, cracks, and other warez. He was not convicted because the courts determined that there was no crime if the defendant hadn't profitted from the alleged copyright violations.

    Obviously this is pertinent to the case of these busted warez organizations. From my humble participation in the scene in '94 and thereabouts, I never saw anyone from the larger groups (Razor, DoD, PwA, RTS) selling CDs, selling FTP access, or otherwise trying to make a buck from warez. Everybody just wanted to get the biggest and best 0-day releases, the coolest demos, and the hardest cracks, then spend all night in IRC bragging about it and trying to take over channels (yay EFnet).

    Have there been any laws since the LaMacchia case that make priacy without profit a federal crime?

    If you haven't got the faintest idea what I'm talking about, Google for David LaMacchia and Harvey Silverglate (civil libertarian and author of The Shadow University)

    1. Re:David LaMacchia precedent by quistas · · Score: 1
      This isn't true -- Razor sold "best of" CDs. $40, cash only. I ordered one when I checked it out as part of an .nfo file included with a release. They took the money, never sent CDs. When I bitched on #razor1911 or whatever the IRC channel was, they laughed about it and said they didn't know what had happened to the guys running that piece, which may or may not have been true -- but they knew about it and had given the go-ahead for someone w/in the group to compile the CDs and organize the .nfo ads in all the releases that came out for a while.


      Being ripped off served me right, but that's a whole other story.


      -- q

    2. Re:David LaMacchia precedent by mdecerbo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Have there been any laws since the LaMacchia case that make priacy without profit a federal crime?

      As far as I can tell, the "No Electronic Theft" or NET act, making it illegal "to reproduce or distribute, including by electronic means, one or more copyrighted works having a total retail value of more than $1,000." (description from this page) is now law. It seems that you can read it here.

      Now, it should be obvious to any reasonable person that 99% of the people who warez down software either can't afford to buy it, and so never would have bought it, or are just trying it out and will probably either buy it or decide it's crap and never run it again. Software "piracy" might not be a victimless crime, but it comes awfully close.

      So why are the feds so concerned about it? Could be just that the adbusters people are right, and the corporations' interests override common sense and the public interest (like, having the FBI spend its time on actual threats to public safety rather than warez mavens, most of whom would probably never hurt a fly.)

      But there's a subtler, more chilling trend going on, too. It's already illegal to buy or sell a radio scanner that tunes the cellular frequencies; you can't buy a wideband receiver unless you're the government (or live overseas; so much for the "land of the free"), and I believe you're not allowed to tune into alphanumeric pagers, though I can't find a reference for this. And the electromagnetic spectrum belongs to all of us, not the government, damnit; why can't I do what I want with the electrons running through my antenna on my property?

      With these raids, they're telling us what we can and can't do with the bits that come down our cable modem; and with the truly chilling SSSCA and prohibitions on digital VCRs, they're going to prevent the computer and home electronics manufacturers from selling boxes that will even permit us from doing things they don't like with the bits.

      It's still a pretty long way before Big Brother and the two-way, spying TV-- but that is the direction we are moving, and as annoying as it is that I'm not gonna be able to get warez as easily now, the broader implications are what really bug me.

    3. Re:David LaMacchia precedent by karb · · Score: 2
      I kind of said this the last time the story came around : (sorry :) )

      Now, it should be obvious to any reasonable person that 99% of the people who warez down software either can't afford to buy it ...

      That it is illegal keeps many people from doing it. Also, should part of a law read "You cannot use software illegally unless you do not profit from it."? That is not a factor in traditional property crimes ... why should it be so in intellectual property crimes?

      or are just trying it out and will probably either buy it or decide it's crap and never run it again

      I've never understood this argument ... most software packages have demo versions. If they don't, you can usually contact the company and arrange a demo with them. Granted, not every company probably does this, but I'm troubled that this major excuse probably only really applies 5% of the time.

      like, having the FBI spend its time on actual threats to public safety rather than warez mavens, most of whom would probably never hurt a fly.

      This is an oft-cited argument whenever somebody is pinched for a minor crime. The simple fact of the matter is that much more time is spent on major crimes. However, if law enforcement spent all of their time on major crimes, we still wouldn't solve all of them, and every minor crime would go unpunished. Also, if you consider that this is the first bust in umpteen years, and the feds sound like they're not going to do it again in the near future, they really aren't spending much time on it (relatively speaking).

      Also, threats to businesses might not seem like public safety issues. But go to Pittsburgh and tell them that intellectual property and protecting the rights of businesses isn't important. They might disagree. Everybody craps on the rights of businesses, but occasionally they need to be protected from unfair competition for the public good.

      --

      Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

    4. Re:David LaMacchia precedent by jburroug · · Score: 2


      That it is illegal keeps many people from doing it. Also, should part of a law read "You cannot use software illegally unless you do not profit from it."? That is not a factor in traditional property crimes ... why should it be so in intellectual property crimes?


      No it doesn't. Everyone I know who is, or used to be (myself included) into Warez knew it was illegal and didn't care. People I know who don't avoid the warez scene do so either because they lack the technical know-how, have personal ethical reasons, consider the time involved in aquiring warez more valuable than the money it costs to buy a package or like me made the switch to Free Software and discovered that warez had become redundant. Those that want to pirate software, and have the skill and time to do it will, regardless of the law.

      The difference between IP "theft" and traditional property crime, is that when you "steal" IP you do not deprive the original owner/creator of the use of the IP, unlike physical property crime. All you are stealing is a potential sale. In my warezing days I liked maybe 1/10 titles I downloaded well enough to even keep installed and use for more than a week, maybe half of those I liked well enough that I would've paid for (and later when I could afford to buy software, did or at least the next release or similar game by the same company) Not that I'm justifying my "piracy" with my later purchases, just being honest and putting my view into perspective. The points I'm trying to make is that piracy isn't really theft, in the same sense that stealing your car is theft, as no one really loses anything and that the law has little to no affect on stopping people from pirating software. On the other hand pirating a software package and reselling your own boxed version (or plain CD's) for 1/10 the regular purchase price does cost the producer something, everyone of those bootleg sales should be considered an actual lost sale IMO. It's the large, for profit pirate rings that actually harm businesses, not a bunch of IRC warez d00ds.

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
  97. I hate teachers like you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, you fucker. I hate you. Teachers like your are fuckers. Why don't you learn how to teach and stop forcing students to learn 1000 meaningless equations that they will never use? Oh yea, I am a computer scienctist, so there goes your "its for science" bullshit. Go fuck yourself. Heaven fobid giving students equations if they know how to use them like it is in the real world. I suppose programmers can't look at referneces sources? That would be cheating! I guess everyone in the real world cheats? So what are you preparing us for? You are a Nazi bitch!

  98. Connect the dots.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An interesting person will interest himself in the things around him..."

    "...with a calculator and tetris clone."


  99. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by kenthorvath · · Score: 2

    The TI89's do indeed do real time rotation as I am doing them right now. If you are thinking of the 92 which does not, that is a big difference but the 92+ model does. The only lacking feature of the 89 is RPN and yeah, it might be nice, but I find that even the buttons are more comfortable on the 89. And BTW, I do in fact own both calculators.

  100. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by kenthorvath · · Score: 2

    My TI89 can do that many calculations in about 15 seconds as well... 842! will do exactly what you just claimed was 842 calculations. I doubt anyone could even TYPE the numbers 1-842 with no spaces or enter keys, etcetera on a computer keyboard in under 15 seconds, even 2+2+2+2... is a stretch.... If this guy can do what he claims, I would really love to see an MPEG... there should be a new category in the Guinness Book of World records.

  101. Re:Strap Me In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your RIAA notice is in the post.

  102. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by snilloc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Things I did w/ my TI graphing calculator:

    1)Write programs to do my repetitive homework assignments for me while the few morons in my class struggled with something basic.

    2)Actually see the full calculation I was attempting to perform, in standard notation, before hitting Enter.

    3)Being able to quickly recall the last few things I did... and edit them efficiently to correct mistakes or perform repetitive tasks.

    4)Cheat. Polyatomic ions (which I eventually learned just from using them so much). As I recall, that was the extent of my cheating.

    5)Check my calculus answers. It was impossible to cheat in my high school calculus class because we always had to show our work. Checking (not cheating) on the calculator saved my butt more than once.

    6) Spiffy self-written Pythagorean program clued me in as to whether or not I would get an answer at the end of my work, and if so, what it would be. As I had a mere TI-82, it was actually necessary for me to write this program. (Half-cheating - The pythagorean theorem is so damn easy. I only wrote the program after seeing how much time I was wasting doing it by hand.)

    7)Programs to reset the variables to various sets of constants, depending on what class I was in, or after another program had just destroyed my variables... it was so much easier in Chem class to just hit "N" than do the SciNotation for Avogadro's number.

    My biggest gripe about graphing calculators in high school are the schools that standardize on one type of calculator and waste valuable time to teach the kids how to use them. There would also be less program (and thus game!) sharing if a few kids had Casios, maybe some HPs for variety, and a few more had various flavors of TI, among which there are minimal compatibilities. (For example, 83 is mostly backwords compatible to 82, but not at all w/ 85. Same with the 86 w.r.t. the 85.).

    As I recall, there was only one test on which my high school calculus teacher didn't allow graphing calculators. All the other times it didn't matter, but the multi-line display sure was a much bigger help than anything else in the calculator.

  103. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by clambert · · Score: 1

    You didn't lose it...it seems like it was stolen from you. ;-)

    --
    mailto:<?=implode("@", array("chris", implode(".", array("php", "net"))))?>
  104. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your grandmother was fucking stupid...you are too.Asshole.

  105. Coming up next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who think differently from the Government Line! Gay people! People who question authorities! People who refuse to consume too much!

  106. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2
    Why not just let them use the notes?


    My high school math teacher (had him from precalc/trig through AP calc BC) had the philosophy that "what's allowed on the AP test will be allowed on my tests." Since you can use calculators/notes/programs on the test, he allowed it in his tests as well.


    Not only did he have a phenomenal ratio of students that passed the test (80% or so got a 5, and virtually everyone who took the test passed), but most of those who had taken the his class performed significantly better in college math courses than their peers.


    Being able to refer to notes doesn't prevent you from learning something -- in fact, it helps you learn to seperate the "theory that you need to understand" from the enormous set of equations that you can always look up if you need.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  107. Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 2

    What is wrong with busting warez distributors? I mean, I'm all in favor of free speech and I believe that source code (even deCSS) and compiled programs should never be banned from distribution, provided that the copyright owner allows it.

    But these people were actually distributing copyrighted material which they *didn't* own the copyright to. I mean, they did something that they new was illegal, is clearly illegal (and has been so for many, many years) and they got caught red-handed. This is not a "free Kevin" or "free Dmitry" type of issue.

    Besides, these guys will all get deals to rat out someone else, just like Dmitry did.

    I'll probably get flamed, but I had to put up my $0.02.

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  108. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by nzeeben · · Score: 1

    I agree with most of what you ahd to say but one small thing about what you said. Pulling the batteries out of the calculators isn't really gonna work as most have a watch battery type backup. And in the case of the TI-83 you would need a screw driver to remove this. Good comments otherwise.

  109. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by lwolf · · Score: 1

    hmm, about this. You say it's not a free kevin issue. so that means kevin didnt' do anything wrong and was a perfect law abiding citizen?

    --
    The only clubbing i do is when people look at me funny :)
  110. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by freeweed · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I won't flame you, because I also share your opinion of "break the law, suffer the consequences". Where I do disagree is in the consequences themselves:

    Imagine if the FBI had spent millions of dollars setting up dragnets on known jaywalkers around the world. These people KNOW they're breaking the law, and they've been caught red-handed. You don't have the RIGHT to jaywalk. Jail time is the only possible answer, right? And to top it all off, undercover agents secretly were telling suspects how to jaywalk, and where to jaywalk.

    Puts things a little more in perspective, right?

    (Note: I'm assuming that jaywalking is illegal in most jurisidictions.. if not, insert your own silly law here)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  111. Get fucking real. Stop making excuses. by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 1

    This is not "censorship" or "oppression." Maybe the tactics used seem heavy handed, but these people were producing and trafficking pirated goods. This is not some new draconian consequence of the DMCA or the WIPO. It has ALWAYS been illegal to pirate other people's creations.

    Frankly, I've used pirated software and am happy I was able to get it. But these folks knew the risks they were taking. They got caught. Let's not whine and complain as if it was somehow sneaky or unfair of the government to enforce basic copyright law.

  112. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Will+Dyson · · Score: 1

    I'd like to introduce you to some of the teachers I had in High School.

    --
    Will Dyson
    "We can't stop here ... This is Bat Country!" - Hunter S. Thompson
  113. B.S.A.? by Mu*puppy · · Score: 1
    Damn, imagine if the BSA ever got to use guns. *shudder*


    As long as I've been a member of the Boy Scouts of America, I can't help but imagine hordes of Boy Scouts pouring through doors, windows, etc, all dressed in Class A uniform in some raid... :3

    --
    There's no wrong way, to eat a Rhesus...
  114. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a problem remembering certain things, like mathematical formulas for example. Without my TI-89 on big tests that require you to remember a large number of formula (finals) I would surely fail. I have notes from about 2 years of college math stored on my TI-89 :|

  115. TI-85 got me started programming by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

    I *definitely* know what you mean about most students just playing tetris on their calculators instead of paying attention.

    However, if not for my TI-85 I got in my freshman year of high school, I might not have become obsessed with programming it and then moved on to bigger and better things, leading to a career in programming. There was something about the simplicity of the calculator that opened the door for me.

    So what I wish is that, if students are supposed to have calculators with these programming capabilities, why not teach students how to use it and expose them to programming?

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  116. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pulling out the big batteries will however erase most things stored like notes or equations. And if not, they've all got keystrokes to reset them.

  117. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I was just about to be blatantly and outrageously rude to you, but slashdot seemed to have a little burp so this is coming out tamer than it was originally.

    All your comments make you sound like a whiny bitch. You don't seem to be doing anything about your problems other than complaining about them. What's worse is that your lack of understanding is the primary reason you seem to be having most of your problems anyway.

    If you were my teacher in highschool, I would have rather dropped out of school before putting up with garbage like yours. You obviously can't even gain the respect of a roomfull of you own students, but instead of trying to do something about it, you play the bastard and accomplish nothing in your goals as a teacher.

    Maybe you should heed the replies to your comment that you are reading here. I'd guess that some of those folks playing games in the back of your class are probably a lot smarter than you are. Maybe you could ask them what they'd do to improve the situation. Obviously you have no idea.

  118. Sealand Anyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God Dam RR is working on the network.

    I have to say. I knew this would comeing sooner or later. But it would be nice if the FBI was going after real crime.
    <SARCASIM>
    Its just nice to know the guy that robed the store last week is going to get less time then software traders.
    </SARCASIM>
    If people are so devoted to the warez scane why do thay not set up an acount at SeaLand(I think thats it) or build their own server floating outside the WTO borders. How about a satelite. People could use the big C-Band dishes laying aounrd everywere(I think thats the big ones pepole used to watch tv on). What about useing HAM radio or Wireless LAN(Word Wide Wireless Network).

    every teenager and collager kide could be geting warez. Of couse this would be better served servering a more speritual[sic] qust such as Open Source. But in ~10 years it might just seam logical. I cold see OSS being outlawed on a certen level. Of course this could go far beyound software and into information. How about the cure for ADIS or other information that could better huminity. Just upload it to a network and the world has it.

    Just a note I am not aginst Copyrights/Corporations/big goverment I am aginst Copyrights/Coporations/big goverments not suported by the population.

    Is it "For the people. By the people" or "For the company by the company"

    011000011001111

  119. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess what...the activities Kevin Mitnick was imprisoned for were illegal too, very illegal actually...the issue there was that he was held for ~5 years or so without being convicted of anything.

    Same thing with Sklyarov (sp?), under current laws, what he did was illegal...the challenge there is to get the law overturned.

  120. www.isonews.com should get busted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is what I don't get, isonews.com openly sells MOD chip for PS2, (so ppl can play copied/ pirated games) and encourages piracy, why is the site op not arrested?

  121. Bankers in Mexico used to be (are?..) speculators by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The reason the banks were nationalixed in 1982 was twofold: certainly the goverment was looking for a suitable scapegoat for all its shortcomings in handling the economy. But Mexican banks were notorious for lacking the most basic business skills that any bank should have (i.e. take care of the bottom line) and they made a bad situation worst facilitating the exit of money from Mexico in disproportionate amounts (which forced the devaluation of the Mexican peso). Once the banks were nationalized the country entered a period of relative stability that would last until 1994 in which the banks, that had been returned to private ownership, were marred by bad debts (and in many cases by outright criminal dealings. Several former new bankers are in jail or hiding from the Mexican justice accussed of all kind of "white collar" crimes).

    Even Citibank, a very respectable American bank, had dealings with Raul Salinas de Gortari, convicted for all kind of different crimes (and brother of former president Carlos Salinas). In US congressional hearings it was demonstrated beyond any doubt that Citibank's procedures were lax, to be polite, when dealing with funds of dubious origin, all this with banks back in private hands.

    The previous posting gives the impression that Banks were somehow harrassed by the bad commie Mexican goverment which, IMVHO, was not the case. Bankers have probed to be even more corrupt than politicians in Mexico (no small feat).

    FWIW, I believe that now the Banco de Mexico (the Mexican "Fed") is independent from the Finance minsiter and they fix interest rates without consulting with the goverment to ensure politics do not taint technical economic decissions.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  122. MIT suspect a sysadmin, not a student by ToastyKen · · Score: 2

    I just want to point out that the guy who got caught at MIT was a sysadmin, not a student..

  123. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by HappyPerson · · Score: 1

    Bravo!!

  124. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by iainl · · Score: 1

    As someone (like many here) who works for a software company, the thing that worries ME about this story is that it seems the way the FBI managed this infiltration was by trading their way in. Yes, those nice government people who we pay taxes to were illegally giving software away in order to look 31337 with these guys. I'm all for busting warez crews, but not by having the FBI do their job for them first.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  125. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo !

    Finally a teacher that've actually understood a couple of things about teaching. Bravo !

  126. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by armb · · Score: 2

    > 842! will do exactly what you just claimed was 842 calculations. I doubt anyone could even TYPE the numbers 1-842 with no spaces or enter keys, etcetera on a computer keyboard in under 15 seconds

    It was five keys on the calculator I had in school. "8" "4" "2" "function shift" "factorial". My calculator would have then displayed an overflow error, but I expect any calculator capable of handling 842! will have a factorial function built in. Or rather an adequately accurate approximation to it - it doesn't actually have to do all those integer multiplications.
    http://www.rskey.org/gamma.htm

    --
    rant
  127. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Mathness · · Score: 1

    You still do not understand his statement.
    842! is entered, and the calculator/computer does the 1*2*3*...*841*842 for you.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  128. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh, you think so?

  129. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by drsquare · · Score: 1

    I'd like to introduce you to Mrs Gander, because I hate you so much.

  130. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I don't agree with the clearing of the memory. In my 10th grade Biology class, my teacher made me erase the memory on my calculator, even though I offered to put it up so I wouldn't have to (I had been working on some rudimentary TiBasic programs, and had hacked Tetris to hell and back, adding title screens, changing point values, I even changed the bit pattern for the block graphic). The stupid teacher WOULDN'T LET ME PUT THE CALCULATOR UP and still made me erase it. Stupid bitch. I bet she still teaches, too.

  131. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by drsquare · · Score: 1

    What? Doesn't your calculator have a ! function?

    And what's so good about RPN? It makes no sense at all.

  132. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by thebabelfish · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I think I was unclear in my original post. When I said that "They still don't forgive me for being able to do 842! in ~15 seconds!" I didn't mean I actually do the work. A better sentence would have been "They still don't forgive me for having a calculator able to do 842! in ~15 seconds!" Sorry for any confusion, and yes, that would be quite a feat which would deserve Guinness's attention.

    --
    "I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
  133. What happened to freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Some information regarding the raids:
    They watched someone's client and pounced on people who came into the channels during that period. There is talk of there being a server that is spying, but I personally do not believe this due to the fact the server would have to be run in debugging mode (using a lot of resources), the amount of information that would be generated and have to be sifted through and of course the admins and opers would have a thing or two to say about it.


    One of my friends was "busted", and so I guess I am biased. I am not into the warez scene myself, but I really do not like the fact they watched someone's client. It seems that every day the police are eating away at our freedom of speech, our right to privacy. Supposing someone had messaged this person (I believe "avec" was the nick) with some confidental information, about thier personal lives or similar. What right have the police to see this information? IRC has traditionally been a medium for free speech, and while I do not condone "warez" or similar activities, I do not like being spyed on. A lot of people are now much more cautious about what they are saying, and some (myself including) are considering implementing client-side encryption.
    I also think it will be interesting to see what evidence they use, because IRC logs are so easily faked, they are just text. I hope someone makes a stand about this before our civil liberties are eroded too much.

    </soapbox>

  134. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by thebabelfish · · Score: 1

    No, of course it does.

    RPN is more logical and follows my flow to thought much better than an algebraic entry system. Plus, you don't need parantheses.

    --
    "I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
  135. Eaders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's an eader?

  136. This happened at Purdue?? by Yekrats · · Score: 1

    As an employee and student of Purdue, the recent "raids" have been completely ignored by all local media. The only coverage I've seen was from national sources: Wired, etc. Who was raided?

    The site mentions a raid occuring in Indianapolis, IN, but Purdue's main campus is in West Lafayette, IN. I don't know of any Purdue campuses in Indianapolis other than IUPUI (pronounced EEyoo-POOey :-), a tiny joint satellite campus shared between Indiana University and Purdue. I'm sure the spin-doctors changed it, because IUPUI doesn't have the name-recognition that Purdue has. I don't think IUPUI is known to anyone outside of Indiana.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
  137. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by quantum+bit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    2. Students remove batteries from the calculators.
    3. The teacher walks to each desk and verifies that the batteries are out.
    4. The students replace batteries and place calculators under their desk.

    Tee hee, I remember my HP48GX had a mega-capacitor inside of it that would keep the memory for up to 10 minutes with no batteries. The idea was to make it easier to change the batteries without losing data, but it made it great for those who didn't understand the technology :)

    Not to mention it had symbolic maniuplation and automatic built-in unit conversion YEARS before TI caught up.

    Personally, I like the attitude of my calculus teacher. You had to show the steps on the test, so I wrote some programs that used the symbolic maniuplation to come up with the right results. A few of the other students thought this was an unfair advantage, but her opinion was, "If you understand the subject well enough to write a program to do it for you, more power to ya."

  138. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by nobody69 · · Score: 1

    ...and he had never learned how to learn math...
    This is a real problem in high schools in my experience. I had some pretty good math teachers in high school, but it sometimes seemed like they were coming from a whole different plane of existence. (Also every math text I ever used from middle school algebra through Calc I in undergrad sucked). I think part of the problem was that my teachers seemed to be 'naturals' at math so it was hard for them to translate for the 'un-naturals', so to speak. Almost like having Barry Sanders[1] as your football coach - "You need to be evade tacklers better, like I did.", "How?", "Dodge 'em, spin, run backwards, reverse field, whatever.", "When I try that I get crushed like a grape!", "I know - that's why I said you need to get better."
    [1]This is a American football, not soccer. Barry Sanders was probably the most evasive runner ever. Somebody once described him by saying "People always claim say Barry Sanders defies the laws of physics - that's crazy, he just embodies some of physics' more outrageous concepts."

    --
    "Bugger this, I want a better world." - Jenny Sparks
  139. Re:I hate.. by talesout · · Score: 1

    Fuck dude, everybody hates Jon Katz. Even people that claim, "He isn't that bad" have a fucking picture of him for throwing darts at. He's like a really good villian. Even if you like him, you still hate him.

    --


    Bite my yammer.
  140. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by connorbd · · Score: 2
    I sat through an entire semester of a programming language class in college that was taught on such a high level that not only did nobody understand, not a single person in the class even had a clue what questions to ask.

    I can find plenty to interest me in programming languages; that's why I designed one myself. But it damn well does matter how a teacher teaches; the student isn't even going to bother trying to find something interesting in the subject if there's no hint of something interesting being there. IMHO you'd find a lot more kids being interested in Math if they knew the implications of what awaited them when they hit calculus class, but we drown them in seemingly unrelated items without giving them a clue of how they connect, with the result being that a lot of kids are lucky to even see trigonometry before they get done with high school, never mind calculus.

    As for entertainment... something tells me you never had a chemistry teacher who blew things up in class. You get a kid's attention by putting a piece of sodium in water, he or she is going to be a lot more interested when you explain the deal with reactive metals than if you simply lay out a few notes in class.

    As for your grandmother... what a bitch, if she reacted to life in general with roughly the same attitude. No wonder you grew up to have an attitude like that.

    /brian

  141. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by albamuth · · Score: 2
    I had a Casio (forget model number) which seemed nicer than the TI-81's of the time (1995)--it was slimmer and had graphical matrix representation, but it used only large watch batteries. The night before the AP Calculus test, I loaded the thing with every trigonomic identity and useful formula possible.

    The test arrived. I turned it on. The power drain was so great that it was unusable. I sighed and stuck a paperclip into the reset hole.

    I got a 3, though. Good enough to skip a semester at college!

    --
    [pink beam of light]
  142. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

    What does "put it up" mean?

  143. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by Erich · · Score: 2

    Jaywalking law is legitamite because it establishes culpability in an accident. If someone walks out from between two cars in the middle of the street and I hit them, it's not my fault; they were the ones breaking the law (and I can sue for damage to my car!). However, if they are in a crosswalk and I hit them then it's my fault.

    --

    -- Erich

    Slashdot reader since 1997

  144. Re:No UBL news today...why? (OT) by Cederic · · Score: 1


    Perhaps many members of the Slashdot community are indeed making a good many comments on the non-IT news in other forums.

    Maybe "without having servers get overloaded" is in fact expected. Perhaps the impact on news servers is minimal, because most people have been getting this news via more conventional sources.

    Slashdot is "News for Nerds". This means basically "whatever interests Taco". It doesn't mean "major world news items". Go elsewhere for those. news.bbc.co.uk has many user contribution forums, go comment in those.

    Just because people on Slashdot manage to read, consider and comment on issues other than those in the mainstream news doesn't mean they aren't following those issues elsewhere.

    Has it not occurred to you that maybe people visit Slashdot _because_ it gives them a distraction from the real world?

    Incidentally, news about a warez crackdown holds far more personal interest to me than news about bin Laden being on video. I don't speak Arabic, I suck at determining whether videos have been faked. So I'll wait a few days and see how world opinion views the tape. Much like i've waited a few days for the response to the raids on warez groups.

    Incidentally, UBL is OBL in the UK.

    ~Cederic

  145. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    great for those who didn't understand the technology
    Yup. Those who don't understand the technology have NO business using it for teaching. I have more patience for Luddites (those who disallow technology out of fear that it may someday replace them) than technophiles (those who incorporate as much technology as possible, regardless of the benefits) when it comes to teaching.

  146. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    The calculators my students used were Casios (FX something I think? It's been nearly ten years...) and the backup battery was easily removable. Both sets of batteries were removed before tests. Come to think of it, though, all that's needed is a simple, failsafe memory-wipe method. Someone else mentioned a capacitor that maintained memory for ten minutes; that won't be removable, obviously. I'd have no problem with a calculator that had a paperclip-sized hole with a reset button under it...walk around the room with a paperclip, and in two minutes the room is ready for the test.

  147. Have they made their point? by Erris · · Score: 2
    High profile raids like this are made more to make a point than to stop an activity. Bill Clinton had his Waco raid to make a point about fire arms. It was pointless violence, as Koresh could have been taken quietly on a visit to town. Clinton wanted to make a point, that the Fed is biger than you and will shoot your ass if you fight. Fighting religious fringe groups played well to Clinton's constituents. It was not intended nor did it hope to eliminate illegal firearms.

    So did John Ashcroft want to send a signal here? If he did it's muddy. You would think that DeCSS would have been mentioned explicitly as a reason for the raid. The reasons given were music and M$ junk, and other coppied cracked comercial software. Also, if he wanted the public to confuse thak kind of trash with banned free software he would have mentioned it as an "encryption circumvention device".

    He might have wanted the news to filter up through the community through some kind of Mad_Quacker.... Ahhhh! the conspiracy theorists are the conspirators.

    Disinformation Nation: where the un fettered flow of non peer moderated publications has exactly the opposite effect of free speech.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  148. just plug extra IDE cards into yer box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as many as there's free PCI slots and fill them with 80gig HDDs.

  149. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by powerlord · · Score: 2

    In most municipalities Jay Walking laws also cover crossing with/against the light, and yet in most cases the driver is still culpable if you hit the pedestrian in the crosswalk (take a look at how Cali law says motorists have to stop as soon as the pedestrian enters the crosswalk).

    Yet in New York for instance, Jay Walking laws aren't enforced (even though there are definate times when they should be), simply because its impractical. Heck I know several friends who ended up getting Jay Walking tickets in other cities specifically because they were from New York where Jay Walking is viewed as rediculous (ie. a person should be brighter than to run between cars, and if you do it and no one gets hurt/no accident or traffic hicup, then all is good).

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  150. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    At my university each candidate is issued a standard calculator at the start of each exam, and they're collected up afterwards. You're not allowed to bring your own calculator into the exam room any more than your own answer booklet to write on. (Your own pens are okay since nobody's found a magical cheat-helping pen.)

    Calculators are so cheap nowadays that you don't have much excuse not to do this. Although your solution of requiring only 'scientific' (I assume this means, not graphical) calculators is also a good answer.

    Unfortunately, people aren't going to stop building features into calculators just because teachers would prefer it that way. It's the schools' responsibility to decide what type of calculators are and are not acceptable in class or in tests.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  151. Re:Bankers in Mexico used to be (are?..) speculato by The+Bungi · · Score: 2

    For the record, I wasn't suggesting that the banks were victims of the big bad corrupt mexican government - not at all. They were all in cahoots at one time or another. You seem to know about all this. Remember the director of Banca Cremi that had to hide in Spain or get busted for financial fraud?

    As for the independence of the monetary boards from the government, yes, that's beggining to look better every day. Under president Zedillo the Finance minister was given a lot more leeway than in all previous administrations (at least that I remember), and I see this trend being continued and expanded under Fox.

    Here's hoping that Mexico can one day be a lot more than a banana republic with make believe banks =)

  152. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by MrResistor · · Score: 2
    Also every math text I ever used from middle school algebra through Calc I in undergrad sucked

    Nobody learns math from books, you have to have a good teacher. By the time I got to Calc III I had gotten to the point where I could figure out from the book how to solve most of the problems, but I didn't really understand the concepts until they were explained to me by someone who really knew them.

    I think part of the problem was that my teachers seemed to be 'naturals' at math so it was hard for them to translate for the 'un-naturals', so to speak.

    This is really an excellent point. One of the things that made me a good tutor was that I actually had to work at it myself, and it hadn't been so long that I couldn't remember how hard it had been. One of the things I always told my most struggling students was that I took Calc I 4(!) times. The first 3 times I don't feel too bad about dropping. In each of those classes there were over 40 students the first day, and no more than 3 ever took the final. I transfered to a different school before I took it again, and I passed with little difficulty.

    I think mathematicians make terrible teachers. All the good math teachers I've had were Engineers and Physicists by training. Understanding the connection between math and the real world is essential to teaching math. For the record, my first 3 Calc I teachers were mathematicians, the last was a Nuclear Engineer.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  153. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I would like to mod this +1 "good thought out post from someone who understands WTH he's talking about"

    Its Ironic that someone who can use hindsight to relize that they where a bad teacher and why, isn't teaching. I think a lot of teachers need to step back and think this way about there teaching. So they can constantly improve there skills.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  154. Warez scene by jasonslater2000 · · Score: 1

    a few comments, as I've been intimately involved in warez proceedings since May 2000. Trust me, I've "been there and done that".

    http://www.cybercrime.gov/pwa_verdict.htm

    1. lawyers/defense are not going to change the laws. they are not interested in doing so. find a lawyer who *wants* to go to trial for the possibility of winning is hard enough - many seem to want to go to trial to bill you more. also, have fun trying to afford a good lawyer to represent you in the federal court system -- do you have a minimum of a hundred thousands dollars to spare? maybe not, after all, warez is a non-profit activity. go the federal defender route and witness getting what you paid for.

    2. if the government charges a warez group as a conspiracy, the individuals are railroaded into entering a guilty plea. other options include: turn in your friends and family for 1/3 off your sentence, testify against other members of your group for 1/3 off, or go to trial and be immediately found guilty by a jury of people who have no clue what warez groups are all about.

    3. you get to witness government (prosecutorial) misrepresentations, stonewalling, withholding evidence, tampering with evidence, etc. first-hand. As one lawyer in the above case phrased it, "You haven't been fucked until you've been fucked by the government."

  155. It is trivial by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

    Not in the "mathematically simple" sense, but in the "of little worth or importance" sense.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:It is trivial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, anything that doesn't interest you is worthless and unimportant. How about you don't bother to post in future and we can just take it for granted that the interests of other people are of zero importance since they don't have your blessing?

  156. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    RPN only makes no sense if you've never used it. Look at it this way:

    When you're doing a math or physics or whatever problem, you generally have a bunch of numbers, and you need to figure out what to do with them.

    In RPN, you put in the bunch of numbers. Then you decide what to do with them. When you hit the * key, for example, the bottom two numbers get multiplied together, and that result is now in your bunch of numbers in their place.

    In algebraic notation, you have to concentrate on the formula, because of keeping track of where the parentheses go and all that. You also have to either do everything in one step, or use something like the [Ans] key to keep using a number that you got as a result. In RPN notation, the numbers you get as results are immediately ready for you to use. Once you learn it, it really feels like you're working with the numbers.

    The one drawback to RPN is that you can't directly put in a formula you see on paper - but this does not slow you down if you understand what the formula does.

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  157. Re:No UBL news today...why? (OT) by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

    Here in the US they usually call him "Osama Bin Laden" as well - but they abbreviate his name UBL. I speculate that the problem is that "Usama" begins with "USA".

    --
    Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  158. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by wickidpisa · · Score: 1

    Any math teacher that worries about students cheating by storing things in their caclulators should not be teaching. It means that they are testing the studens more on straight memorization than on thinking and reasoning. If you made tests that actually tested student's understanding of the material rather than what they memorized would eliminate the worry of notes in caclulators, since you can't store understanding in a calulator.

  159. I can't believe it... by theantix · · Score: 2
    God, I can't wait for K5 to come back so I can get out of here. I really can't believe that michael actually insulted you for contributing to Slashdot! What a riot... it's almost as entertaining as adequacy.org!

    Hmm... I wonder what would happen if he found out that I was the "michael is a wanker" troll. Ooops. =)

    --
    501 Not Implemented
  160. Re:Ticalc? TI-89s? by Samuel+Hughes · · Score: 1

    I lost it, then somebody found it, and decided to keep it. It was my fault for losing it.

  161. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    Well, I wouldn't say that! He admitted many illegal acts, and perhaps comitted some that he was never accused of (who knows).

    But some of the allegedly illegal things that Mitnick did apparently were kind of a stretch.

    Also, he spent a lot of time in jail without a trial. I don't know if he somehow waived his right to a speedy trial or what, but you're not supposed to have to spend years in jail awaiting a trial in the USA.

    I think the bottom line is that eventually they were out to get him, no matter what. He was villifed in the press, (anonymous high-level sources), etc.

    I think, ultimately, Kevin was a victim of demonization by law enforcement and industry players.

    What I meant when I said that it is not a "free Kevin" issue, is that there did not appear to be any miscarriage of justice going on with these warez busts. The crime is not theoretical or any kind of stretch.

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  162. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    It is questionable whether what Sklyarov did was illegal because he did it in Russia. Anyway, he got a deal so the challenge to the law will have to wait.

    Anyway, I don't feel that copyright law is ridiculous or stupid (I observe it pretty carefully, as a matter of fact).

    On the other hand, the provisions of the DMCA, which apparently make it illegal to distribute some source code or compiled programs are, to me, an outrage. Hopefully those provisions will be overturned.

    Others have raised good points about entrapment and so on. Something interesting is that apparently, Hoover himself didn't approve of using under-cover agents in the FBI.

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  163. Re:Warez bust. Aw, soooo sad. by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

    Heh. I hear you. It is a bit unsavory isn't it?

    Did you see _Training Day_?

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  164. How are you teaching your class? by ajdecon · · Score: 1

    You can't be doing very well with it. Please tell me this post is a joke. I've had bad math teachers before, but...

    Fist of all, a calculator is a tool of science and business. This does not mean it is a single-purpose device, or even that it should be a single-purpose device. The games are fun, and a good way to pass time when you're not in math class and the calculator is handy. If you programs the games yourself, even better!! You're probably getting more logical-thinking experience from programming than from most classes you have in high-school.

    Second, if you have problems with cheating and taking notes, you aren't teaching your class effectively. Sure, the calculators can store notes and such calculators as TI-89's allow a student to take shortcuts. So what? You aren't teaching facts, figures and formulas; you're teaching the method for arriving at the answers, and any decent math teacher will require that all work be shown. How else can you tell where a student went wrong in a problem, and draw his attention to the mistake and how to correct it?

    I am currently enrolled in my high school's AP Calculus class. My teacher allows the use of graphing claculators, allows full use of written and calculator notes on tests, and frequently gives us example problems for these notes. Then he gives us completely new problems on the tests, often with twists added to see if we learned the material. All work is shown, he marks students' mistakes on the papers, and hands them back in the next class period. Then we go over any questons we had problems with, work them out again, and do our best to insure mistakes aren't repeated.

    I find it hard to imagine a class with more free access to tools and information, and yet we learn the material. Why? Because he teaches us how to find answers on our own, then shows us exactly how we made our mistakes and what we could do better. This doesn't require restrictions on calculators or notes: all it requires is an active and helpful teacher.

    --
    "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself." -Richard Feynman
    1. Re:How are you teaching your class? by calculusmom · · Score: 1

      As a current Calculus teacher, I say "bravo."

      A good math teacher embraces technology for its good points and uses it when appropriate, not constantly. When the College Board chose to allow the use of calculators on the AP test, it was because the colleges saw the need for it and requested it. The test is specifically designed to be half calculator, half non-calculator, in order to put all testers on an even playing field. All of the other good Calculus teachers I know construct their tests the same way.

      Math cannot be made applicable without the use of technology (ie. "life does not come out even"), but it cannot completely depend on technology either. I was a AP Calculus student BC (before calculators), and I am now teaching with them. The application problems are so much better now because we do not have to work with contrived problems that have pretty answers because we do not want to become bogged down in the number crunching. Find a happy medium, folks! Banning then outright is not the solution; neither is full-scale usage. There is a balance - teachers just need to find it.

  165. Humm. Well, la la laaaa.... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    Ok, I have to admit that Galvatron and Michael were quite amusing by completely ignoring what I had said and drew their own conclusions based on that.

    Lovely.

    However, like turbine, I do make very valid points but lack the coherency at times trying to make that point clear. C'est la vie.

    When most people talk about "Crack Smoking Moderators", I think what they are really trying to say is; 2/3's of the moderators really do make an effort to do a good job, the other 1/3, however, don't seem to have a clue.
    Why?
    Well, IMO the 1/3 have never read the faq I think.
    I've seen well done sarcasm modded as a troll.
    For me, I fell for it, but I think of it this way:
    if you read something that makes you angry, read it again. If you get angrier, that's flamebait. If you think it is dumb, that is a troll. If you laugh, heh funny, informative, insightful or a + score of your choosing.

    Now I've gotten mod points, what? a grand total of 3 times...read the faq the first two time, beacuse: I did NOT want to fall into a CSM.
    I don't recall modding anyone down, either, because the trolls had been taken care of.
    Now, IIRC, does it or does it not say "don't mod people down because you disagree with them?".

    That is exactly what I saw going on. Modding down (censorship, if you will) not because of what I said, but "who" I was.

    I'll admit, it was the same "pissed offedness" that lead to things such as the the Boston Tea party, and the various wars.

    I've said it before (as have others): Moderators are the "other white meat" aka Anon. Cowards.
    Or, in someone's better words: Moderators should not be both *anonymous* and *unaccoutable*.

    Does metamoderation do any good? Hell if I know, for I gave up metamoderating for a while.
    Now I just look for modding down of comments and apply the rules I've mentioned above. Blatant troll/flamebait is modded as fair, otherwise I mark it unfair.

    Hence my benefit of the doubt philosophy, Mike.

    The point of all this?
    Simple: The /. team does things a certain way because it works the majority of the time.
    We get angry when it does not work or is applied unjustly.

    We, as techs, like to fix problems. It is our nature. I'm sure if I gave it some thought I could think of something, but, alas, I'm too tired, too buzzed, and too relaxed at the moment to give a shit and think about this particular thread anymore.

    Cheers, my friends.

    Moose.

    PS. Could we add a "reply karma" category? 75 replies so far..heh, and I did not say "First post either".

    Anywho...

    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  166. I dunno. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I mean, it's shaky..
    If they put up a site, and just let people 'do whatever'...

    Thing is... I mean, I think entrapment is wrong.
    But... I think there is some legal (and common sense) validity to allowing them to pose as drug dealers, or put up a warez site, or whatever, to catch people. I mean, in one sense, they are encouraging it.. but in another, they are merely posing as one of many, many such sites out there. In other words, it's fairly easy to see they are not trying to 'trick' someone into doing something they would not otherwise do.

  167. Heh, never ceases to amaze me.. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2

    How this gets modded as a troll never ceases to amaze me, when "you need to adjust your tinfoil hat" (a la michael) gets passed over *and* other post pointing out the *exact* same thing I was talking about are passed over or even modded up!

    You see this is the exact kind of hypocritical behaviour that this discussion is targeting.

    And whilst I'm at it: Does metamoderation actually *DO* anything? Seriously, Mike, does it?

    Consider that if a post is marked as a troll, and it is not a troll, does the moderation get *undone*? Or is the moderator just marked for a period of time?

    If you see my point of view, you have to admit that if a moderator is doing a bad job, his/her moderations *should* be undone if at all possible.

    Because the point we are making is: No good deed goes unpunished and the opposite is also true.

    On the whole, Slashdot is doing an excellent job.
    But, that good job is being undermined by (and this is my opinion, mind you) by a certain few.

    {I'd also be willing to bet that Galvatron recently got mod points on that day. If it were possible...hey, a new slashcode idea...I'd bet, oh, say 10 karma points---what else are they good for? Nothing, really--- that it was him. J'accuse! If I am right I get 10 of his, If I am wrong, he/she gets 10 of mine}
    :)

    Gotta love the new math, tho, at the kap, got a +4 from a comment...but one -1 and now at 49.
    Heh, 50+4-1=49? cute.

    Oh, well, ever since hitting the cap on the other account, I stopped taking moderation seriously (and metamoding for that matter)... I just post here to realax.

    hasta.

    Moose
    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  168. fight the power!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    keep up the good work fellow trolls!!

    We must expose the evil ways of the slashdot staff!

  169. Re:Humm. Well, la la laaaa.... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

    I'm with you on the meta-moderation...

    I go through the meta-mods fairly quickly, looking for things that have been down-mod'd, and if it's Redundant or Over-rated, I check the context of the post (but not the author), and it usually gets mod'd back up.

    Redundant is actually the one I'm hardest on...

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  170. To answer your final question: by Blue+Aardvark+House · · Score: 2

    Yes.

    In the field displaying the post's vital information (posted by, subject, etc.), the ipid and Subnet are also displayed. Clicking the displayed info lists all posts made from the ipid or Subnet. Anyone with editor status may view the ipid and Subnet hashes.

    The info is discarded in approximately two weeks.