Slashdot Mirror


More on Future X-Box Capabilities

rtphokie writes "The oft - rumored expansion of Microsoft's Xbox from a gaming console to a more full featured entertainment hub is taking a little more shape. A C|Net article tells of a HomeStation device which is claimed to be slated for a fall release. In addition to Xbox game compatibility and DVD functionality, it is reported to have TiVo/UltimateTV like PVR functionality as well as WebTV like email and web surfing capabilities. This "report" comes on the heels of the announcement of the Moxi Digital set-top MoxiMedia Center which was named "Best of Show" at the recent Consumer Electronics Show."

301 comments

  1. I don't want MS to run my home! by eaddict · · Score: 1

    Where are the other developers? Why is X10 the only other company besides MS spending $$$ to educate the masses? I am sure there are better products out there, but just like DEC and Novell they don't have a marketing department.

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
    1. Re:I don't want MS to run my home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might buy an XBOX just so I can take a dump on top of it and take it back to the store.

    2. Re:I don't want MS to run my home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well for those of us that don't want X-Box in our homes, their lack of third party support is a relief. You can be assured that without that support they aren't going to do as well as they could be. No game console in the history of the market, or at least since the SNES days, has been able to succeed going it alone with a library of games that are primarily first party. I doubt even Micro$oft can over come that fact, and I think it will show down the road.

    3. Re:I don't want MS to run my home! by toopc · · Score: 1
      Well for those of us that don't want X-Box in our homes, their lack of third party support is a relief.

      There's a lack of 3rd party support for the XBox? When did Microsoft buy all of these companies currently making games for the XBox?

      GodGames
      Konami
      Midway
      Ubi Soft
      Electronic Arts
      THQ
      Aclaim
      Tecmo
      Capcom
      Sega
      Interpay
      Crave
      Infogames
      Eidos
      Rockstar
      TDK Mediactive
      LucasArts
      Bethesda

      And that's just the currently released software.

    4. Re:I don't want MS to run my home! by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >There's a lack of 3rd party support for the XBox? When did Microsoft
      >buy all of these companies currently making games for the XBox?

      Get real. Most of those games are *VAPORWARE* They don't actually exist. In most cases what you see displayed especially at places like EB that jumped on the Xbox bandwagon is a empty cardboard box that comes with vague techobabble from EB employees (like you) about some vague release date in the future.

    5. Re:I don't want MS to run my home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did a quick search on game ranking from XBox games and it came back with some matches. I'm using toopc's list of 3rd party developers and it might be lacking because i don't really care about XBox and didn't take too much time to research.

      wasn't listed GodGames
      Air Force Delta Storm Konami
      NFL blitz 2002 Midway
      Rayman
      Batman Ubi Soft
      sports game whore, makes
      games accross all
      platforms Electronic Arts
      New Legends
      Dark Summit
      MX 2002 THQ
      Dave Mirra 2 Aclaim
      Dead or Alive 3 Tecmo
      Genma Onimusha Capcom
      Jet Set Radio Future Sega
      Hunter: The Reckoning Interpay
      UFC: Tapout Crave
      Unreal Championship
      Test Drive Wide Open Infogames
      Mad Dash Racing Eidos
      Max Payne Rockstar
      Shrek TDK Mediactive
      Star Wars: Starfighter
      Obi Wan LucasArts
      The Elder Scrolls 3: Morrowind Bethesda

      so they do have some third party support but the only stellar game that has come from the third parties has been Dead or Alive 3.

    6. Re:I don't want MS to run my home! by nweez · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, another Nintendo/Sony fanboy.....

  2. Xbox Expanding. by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 2, Funny

    I also hear that you can hook up the clapper to it.

    Clap off, clap on....Ever claped a BSOD?

    --
    Neck_of_the_Woods
    #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
    1. Re:Xbox Expanding. by BlaKnail · · Score: 1

      you forget...its the GSOD with the Xbox

    2. Re:Xbox Expanding. by kenthorvath · · Score: 1, Funny
      I also hear that you can hook up the clapper to it.

      Yeah, but I'm waiting for a portable version so I can play it on the crapper.

    3. Re:Xbox Expanding. by Spankophile · · Score: 1

      You forget - the GSOD is FUD.

  3. Hmmmmm.... by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 0, Troll

    I still don't see a compelling reason to give Microsoft any of my money...

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
    1. Re:Hmmmmm.... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Not quite, the X-Box competes directly with PS2 and the Gamecube - both of which seem to have either better games already, or pthe promise of better games in the future. If there was something on the X-Box one FIFTH as good as MGS2, it would be a contender. In the UK, X-Box is priced at DOUBLE the rate of the PS2. You'd be mad to buy one at the moment IMHO.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Hmmmmm.... by toopc · · Score: 1
      If there was something on the X-Box one FIFTH as good as MGS2, it would be a contender

      There is, it's called Halo and most gaming sites think it's at least 1/5 as good as MGS2.

      Halo Review - 9.7/10
      Metal Gear Solid 2 Review - 9.6/10

      Halo Review - 9.7/10
      Metal Gear Solid 2 Review - 9.7/10

      So I guess that means it's a contender in your book.

    3. Re:Hmmmmm.... by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      No, I wouldn't. I dont care who makes it, If it dosen't have the games I want, then I will not buy it. Right this very second, PS2 has all the titles I want both from the new category (PS2), and the old category (PSX). Add the dvd and cd players and I'm sold. As soon as the price drops that is. Right now I'm still happy with my psx and thos old un-hip low-res games. If the xbox has some games I want in the future, then yes I will consider buying a used one. Especially if psx emulation can be done on it. But I will not buy one new as I don't feel the need to give Microsoft any of my money. Thats my personal opinion and bias. Even if there was a linux based open source console, I'd have to play the games and decide.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    4. Re:Hmmmmm.... by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >There is, it's called Halo and most gaming sites think it's at least
      >1/5 as good as MGS2.
      >
      >
      Heh. Braindead PC gamers praising yet another braindead PCish FPS. Yeah. Devil May Cry for the PS2 shows just how lame Halo and FPS games really are.

  4. Obey and delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be sure to read the prognostication from Microsoft, then heed and obey so that other developers are frozen out of the market while we wait for Microsoft to deliver. Keep The System Alive!

  5. Blue Screen of Entertainment Death by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 1, Troll

    I don't think I'd trust Microsoft to record any television I thought important enough to try to record. I'd get to the good part watching it later, and it would crash my TV. Then their help desk would tell me I needed to upgrade my television or something. No, I'll just stick to VHS tapes and my DVD player, thank you.

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
    1. Re:Blue Screen of Entertainment Death by CuCullin · · Score: 1

      Well even with that, I remember recently hearing on the radio that the "new" way of digitally recording TV (eliminating commercials, which has been available on VCR's for some time now) was being contested, and that some were ready to sue. So what would be special about an xbox recording? I think $40 for a VCR is a little bit more cost effective....

    2. Re:Blue Screen of Entertainment Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two - count 'em! - two clueless fucks.

      Get a Tivo!

    3. Re:Blue Screen of Entertainment Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One - count 'em- one clueless fat ass!

      Don't spend so much time/money on TV!

  6. Rumors by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1, Troll

    There seems to be a whole lotta rumors and assumptions in this article. They don't even agree on when it would happen. It might make sense but they might as well be guessing that Microsoft will launch porn site - I mean they have the resources to do it.

    1. Re:Rumors by Mr_Matt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Holy crap do we have an M$ apologist running amok with moderator points today - all you have to do is think about the word "BSOD" and you get yourself a "Troll" moniker. Hopefully, people will metamoderate this tool so severely that they never get mod points again. I mean, Christ, how is parent post a troll? Get real, already.

      Just to keep this on-topic - nowhere did I read in the article the most likely use for the X-Box, given the success of the Gamecube and the still-reignant PS-2: that of a $300 doorstop. Dreamcast, anybody?

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
  7. Beatrice? by psychophil.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone rememember many years back the Beatrice commercials? You'd see commercials for everyday brand name products and that last second of the commercial was a little jingle and the words 'We're Beatrice'.

    Remember how fast thost commercials went away? People start freaking out when they realizes that 65-75% of the products they use where produced by a single company. Beatrice quickly dropped the 'look how freaking large we are' strategy and went back to just promoting the single brand names on their own.

    I can't help but think the same thing is going to happen to microsoft. People are going to suddenly wake up and realize the the MS logo is on their computer, tv's, vcr's/dvr's, video games, toddler toys, kitchen appliances, car electroncs, etc...

    1. Re:Beatrice? by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

      What ever happened to Beatrice, anyway? They're no longer on the NYSE ... change of name? breakup?

    2. Re:Beatrice? by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Karma whoring: Remembering "Beatrice".

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:Beatrice? by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm not so sure. I mean, my TV, stereo receiver, speakers, DVD player, DVD movies, CD player, video game console and car stereo all have SONY stamped on them. Yet I don't see people freaking out about that.

      When it comes to software, yes people freak out because of the monopoly issue. However, when it comes to hardware and gadgets, Joe Average isn't so afraid. Normal folk don't think of Microsoft as a hardware company like Sony or Panasonic. Perhaps they should, considering how well MS has done with the X-Box so far. I think we're still a few years off from having Microsoft suffering from the "Beatrice Effect". People still have the general perception that MS is still a software company.

    4. Re:Beatrice? by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that all the items in your example with the Sony label are in the narrow category of consumer electronics. It doesn't scare people to have a consumer electronics company (Sony) making consumer electronics. I think it *will* scare people (at least it scares me!) to have a software company (Microsoft) making consumer electronics, home appliances, etc.

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    5. Re:Beatrice? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      ------
      I think it *will* scare people (at least it
      scares me!) to have a software company (Microsoft) making consumer electronics, home appliances, etc.
      ------

      Yeah, Psion was pretty scary!

    6. Re:Beatrice? by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft actually has a pretty narrow market. It's all computer-related stuff. They made a couple toys, but they were toys that interacted with the computer. You won't see a Microsoft VCR, but you'd see a Microsoft PVR, which is like a computer-enhanced VCR. If you started to see Microsoft Laundry Detergent, Microsoft Car Rentals, and Microsoft: the Soft Drink, then people might start wondering.

    7. Re:Beatrice? by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised the original poster here didn't get modded down for off-topicness. I can see where he's going, but there's a difference between one company owning your life and a company making an all-in-one product (which is the case here). Anyway, I can still see where he was going with this. I'm opposed to "all-in-one" units, but not because I think they're bad. They are an ideal solution for people who are willing to suffer through mediocre quality for a bargain and compactness. My worry is that they're eventually dominate the market, slowing beating down the level of customizability available to use in our household electronics.

      After all, who wants a computer that's self-contained and virtually unmodifiable, even if it can play DVDs and serve the functions of a TiVo. I have no interest in a computerized entertainment hub, thank you very much. The same goes for the kind of things this article claims will be happening to the X-Box. I have a great 5-DVD changer right now. I love it. It's resting on top of a surround receiver which I also love. On top of it is a 60-disc CD player that works great. Why should I replace these with an all-in-one unit? And how can an all-in-one possibly give me the functionality and level of customization that all of these do?

      --
      If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
    8. Re:Beatrice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember Microsoft(r) Barney(r)?

    9. Re:Beatrice? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      More or less computer-related. 2 years ago they tried to buy the cable network of Deutsche Telekom (IOW almost all cable in Germany). They did buy larger shares of Telcos, a cell phone manufacturer, and are "involved" with NBC. Just wait till you see MS Online Laundry Service, MS Online Car Rental Service and MS Online Soft Drink Service.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    10. Re:Beatrice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AdCritic appears to have gone out of business... otherwise, I would have posted the ad for Microsoft Bra.

    11. Re:Beatrice? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. I mean, my TV, stereo receiver, speakers, DVD player, DVD movies, CD player, video game console and car stereo all have SONY stamped on them. Yet I don't see people freaking out about that.

      I would freak out if all my electronics devices were made by Sony. But that's just Sony, I wouldn't mind if it was all a reliable brand...

    12. Re:Beatrice? by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1

      That's pretty amazing. I, personally, like to have a choice when I go shopping. I own 4 TVs, all are different brands. I own a Powerbook because, in my opinion, it's the best laptop on the market. As for Sony, I do like some of their portable electronics. If asked what camcorder to buy I would say Sony. As for consumer electronics Sony is the only product that has given me problems (DVD player/LD player/tv) so I wouldn't suggest buying that line. Competition is about choice. Without it we wouldn't have "Car of the Year", "best in show", etc... Life would be pretty dull...

    13. Re:Beatrice? by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      Microsoft: The Lunchbox, Microsoft: The Doll, Microsoft: The Flame Thrower...*flames*

      Then later we see Microsoft: The Toliet Paper, Microsoft: The Menu...

      Hold on, you say Mel Brooks ISN'T the CEO of Microsoft? Oh, then nevermind.

      --MonMotha

    14. Re:Beatrice? by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > I mean, my TV, stereo receiver, speakers, DVD player, DVD movies, CD player, video game console and car stereo all have SONY stamped on them. Yet I don't see people freaking out about that.

      That's because there is more than just Sony in the consumer product marketplace. Silly git.

  8. I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The media port on the back of the Xbox is labelled Video Input/Output. If it had a method of storing PVR info on a network share, it might have everything it needs now.

    Golly, this is the first pro Xbox message in this article...hope it doesn't get modded into oblivion!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by rtphokie · · Score: 1

      I doubt very seriously we'll see free or low cost upgrades for the Xbox. Did MS even market it as an upgradable device?

      I'm guessing if any upgrades to appear, they'll be pretty expensive.

    2. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by Bastard+Operator+Fro · · Score: 1

      I checked the mod drop down list... no "Oblivion" Damn it, would have been useful.

      --
      Shaun Nelson - Bastard Operator (From Hell / For Hire)
    3. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by dtfarmer · · Score: 1

      The media port on the back of the Xbox is labelled Video Input/Output. If it had a method of storing PVR info on a network share, it might have everything it needs now.

      I don't think the XBox has the power to do real-time MPEG-2 compression without some custom silicon (Both the ReplayTV and Tivo units use custom chips to handle the encoding, IIRC) - it would also need to contain a tuner, or an ir blaster to control a cable or satellite box. It would be a poor man's ReplayTV, if it could be done - but that kind of thinking hasn't stopped PC's from dominating over Macs, so why wouldn't it work?

      God help us all!

    4. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by RedX · · Score: 2

      Actually I'd bet that the initial functionality would be similar to MS's UltimateTV, which does no MPEG encoding but simply records the raw stream from a satellite feed. I haven't actually seen the internals of an XBox to know if that would be feasible, but that type of implementation would mostly be a software upgrade if the video-in port already exists.

    5. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by Type-R · · Score: 1

      Windows 95?

      For only mere hundreds (or thousands if you want the REALLY cool ones) you can upgrade Windows 95 (the only OS you'll ever need) to:

      • Win98
      • Win98SE
      • Win98SE2
      • WindowsME
      • WindowsNT4
      • Windows 2000 Pro
      • Windows 2000 server
      • Windows 2000 Advanced server
      • Windows XP home
      • Windows XP advanced
      • I mean really, there are so many ways of getting screwed, err, upgraded!

        And of course, an upgraded turd is still a turd. :)

    6. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by Namarrgon · · Score: 2

      Pinouts for the Xbox video port. There's no provision for any signal inputs.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    7. Re:I wonder at the existing unit's capabilities. by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      Not to be a nudge (XBox is my favorite console right now) but I think the video "input" is relatively simplistic: like telling the XBox a video kit is hooked up and which one (RCA, HDTV, S-Video, etc.). Also, it most likely tells the XBox when the wire is disconnected (try removing the wire and looking at the front light sometime).

      Outside of this, yes it would be cool. But no, I don't think it'll happen. :)

  9. I'm sick of the quote marks by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    "this report"

    What is that supposed to mean? Why the quote marks? Are you claiming the article is not, in fact, a report? Or are you just injecting cynical sarcasm to boost your /. reputation as a Microsoft-hater?

    Perhaps you really have a reason, I don't know, but some description of why you would characterize this as a "report" instead of a report would at least provide some clarity as to your thoughts on the matter.

    --
    I think I'll stop here.
    1. Re:I'm sick of the quote marks by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      I think he put it in quotes because, as I stated above, the whole story is suspect. There is no solid evidence of anything that is prognosticated.

    2. Re:I'm sick of the quote marks by SpinyNorman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It deserves the scare quotes because it's a security analyst pushing one of his stocks - it's not an objective report.

    3. Re:I'm sick of the quote marks by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 2

      Sure, I understand that the product is vapor, but the fact that someone reported that there are plans to make it is not suspect. Are we saying that there are no plans to make it, and the report was just made up? I'm sure all reports of new products are exaggerated and hopeful in their timing, but it's not as if they are creative writing or fictional short-stories.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    4. Re:I'm sick of the quote marks by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I wouldn't have put in quotes either. I actually very rarely use quotes unless I am actually quoting something. I prefer italics or bold if I need to emphasize something. Either way, I was really trying to read the original authors mind.

  10. Offtopic but necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why won't /. report on the Solaris security bug EVERYONE else is bringing up today? Or do we only discuss Microsoft exploits here?

  11. wow by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 5, Funny

    someone actually came out and called that "Modified Pentium 3" what it really is...

    Mosesmann said the HomeStation will be based on the Xbox design, which is similar to a PC and uses standard PC components such as an Intel Celeron processor and USB ports.

    Homestation. If you listen real close, you can hear Sony's lawyers suiting up...

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
    1. Re:wow by garcia · · Score: 2

      That makes no sense to me.

      Playstation -> Homestation.
      Windows -> Lindows.

      I think that should be the only god damn piece of evidence in the Lindows case.

      BTW -- that is the best quote from Dilbert. I am pissing my pants over it :)

    2. Re:wow by Glonk · · Score: 1

      someone actually came out and called that "Modified Pentium 3" what it really is...

      It's closer to a Pentium III than a Celeron. Celerons have 4-way L2 cache, Pentium IIIs have 8-way L2 cache. There's about a 10% performance difference between those two. The reason why it's often mistaken for a Celeron is people just look at the L2 cache number (128KB rather than 256KB), and not the L2 cache speed.

    3. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >That makes no sense to me.
      >Playstation -> Homestation.
      >Windows -> Lindows.
      >I think that should be the only god damn piece of >evidence in the Lindows case.

      Indeed, that's exactly what I was thinking too. Who the hell do they think they are, sueing Lindows because it sounds like "windows" (which is a common english word which shouldn't have a trademark on it), but then ripping off "playstation" (which is a real trademark since this word was made up) and trying to use "homestation".

      Please, give me a break, Microsoft. You're doing EXACTLY the opposite of what you don't want the others to do. STFU and compete like any real company. Bad products = bad company = bankruptcy.

      I'm going to install RedHat or Mandrake or whatever, just so I won't be using your WindowsXP/.Net monopoly.

      Have a nice Borg day, drones.

    4. Re:wow by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      "Playstation" is openly acknowledged to be the answer to the question 'If one uses a workstation to do computer work, what would one use to do computer games?'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:wow by Namarrgon · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the 133 MHz FSB, seen on all PIIIs these days.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  12. Here's why by sterno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well as we all know, open source is unamerican so you can't, in good conscience, use open source software. So Linux, BSD, etc, are right out.

    You could use a proprietary Unix but that's 70's era technology. You don't want to be using something that out of date.

    There's a couple little oddities like BeOS out there but those don't have any software for them and they are doomed so why waste your money.

    You could go with MacOS, but as we all know Steve Jobs isn't a techie and is therefor unqualified to be the figurehead for any product worth buying.

    So your only reasonable choice is to go with Windows.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  13. Not good by NeuroMorphus · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't like the idea of turning on my television to watch TechTV and getting the Blue Screen of Death.

    --

    python >>>
    reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
    1. Re:Not good by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Do you mean on your TV, or on TechTV's systems? The latter is more likely.

      Has Leo tried to install Linux within the time frame of his show recently?

  14. The diference between Homestation and MoxiBoxi... by IIOIOOIOO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that Microsoft actually has all of their stuff written already, while the MoxiBoxi is currently vapor-tastic. Unless, of course, Moxi is just planning on rolling out a slightly tweaked WinXP embedded box, which would create nothing more than a Homestation minus XBOX game compatability. Personally, I think Microsoft release WinXP embedded for no other reason than to make corporations feel silly about writing their own STB software. Then, when the suits decide to just use the XP Embedded softwares, they'll have a hard time distinguishing themselves from a superior (XBOX compatible) Homestation.

  15. WebTV? /shiver by FileNotFound · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Xbox will have WebTV like capability?

    Just when you thought the cursed thing had died.
    Has anyone ever tried to make a webpage work with it? By far the most cryptic errors ever.

    "This page is too large to display" on a TINY page.

    Tivo? How big is the HD on the Xbox anyway.

    Now I've been dreaming of this for years.

    Why not instead of trying to make a PC out of an Xbox make an Xbox out of a PC?

    Why not release a $150 card or even $300 one that you stick and your PC and tada you can play Xbox games on your nice non blury monitor?
    Same with PS2 etc.

    Staying on topic, M$ trying to make something do everything is typical. So expect the Xbox to try to do many things and fail at all of them.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:WebTV? /shiver by fedos · · Score: 1
      Staying on topic, M$ trying to make something do everything is typical. So expect the Xbox to try to do many things and fail at all of them.

      But that has always been their achilles heel. They have here what could be considered the best console system out there and they would ruin it by adding junk that most don't want and those who do can get elsewhere.

      All they'll end up with is a mess. Look at XP, they weren't happy with just an OS, so they added every possible type of utility software they could imagine. What do they end up with? An OS that's good for not much more than being used as a case study in a computer security seminar.

      Don't get me wrong, the Xbox does look like a great machine, I'd buy one if'n I had the cash. But MS's management is always so worried about total control that they would turn that into a peice of junk.

    2. Re:WebTV? /shiver by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      Tivo capability, hmmmm....

      "Aww crap.... I just taped over all my MS-Game 2.0 save games with an episode of Meet The Press..."

    3. Re:WebTV? /shiver by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Why not release a $150 card or even $300 one that you stick and your PC and tada you can play Xbox games on your nice non blury monitor? Same with PS2 etc.

      Or, Microsoft could just make a $30 VGA adapter. I don't know why they don't - there's one for the PS2, one for the Dreamcast, and probably one for the Gamecube...

      Actually, I was ready to flame you out the wazoo for your idea, but then I checked and discovered to my suprise that Microsoft doesn't make a VGA-adapter.

      Puzzling! And interesting... there must be some reason... it's almost like they don't want the XBox encroaching on the PC's territory. And yet, their future plans seem to revolve around the idea of XBox/HomeStation/etc encroaching on the PC's territory. It's not like they're afraid of losing money on making this adapter- I'm sure 3-rd party companies would gladly pay for a license to make it, no financial risk to Microsoft there...

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    4. Re:WebTV? /shiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not release a $150 card or even $300 one that you stick and your PC and tada you can play Xbox games on your nice non blury monitor?

      Same reason Apple doesn't release a G4 card and let you use OS X on x86.

      There's a lot to be said for controlling the hardware specs. Almost all game returns and tech support questions are because the user has a graphic card/sound card/etc that isn't compliant.

      With XBox, MS controls all the hardware and base software. It's a known target for customer support and game developers. With a PC card, you have to deal with half different mobos, cpus (and speeds), ram amounts, hard drives, other peripherals, other installed software, etc.

      And what do they gain? an XBox to vga output converter would be a more likely solution. Or just use a TV card.

  16. Future capabilities! by Hatechall · · Score: 1

    Coming soon: No longer will you have to suffer from out awesome green graphic of death! It will become customisable! How about orange! Yellow? Avaliable in a week, the classics! Pure blue screen of death(tm). Now doesn't that bring back memories! Try to resist your nostalgic impulses, because we also have the newer WinNT Screen of Blue and While letters! (tm) Oh, those were the days, when you could try to decipher those cryptic codes and such. You are worried about costs! Don't be! With our new "WeAreWatchingYou24HoursADayEvenWhileYouCrap" technology youi can rent these on an hourly basis, and we will even have a hired goon come to your house and remove them after you have stopped payments! Did we say hired goon? We meant Nice Friendly Mr Happy Guy! Yay!

    1. Re:Future capabilities! by SpinyManiac · · Score: 1


      Actually, you can change the colour of the BSOD, and the text colour.
      I had a GSOD on my 95 box at work for a while.

      Here's the info, for the Windows 9x users among you:

      In system.ini, add the following under [386Enh]:
      MessageBackColor=Colour (default is 1).
      MessageTextColor=Colour (default is F).
      Colour is one of the following:
      0 (black)
      1 (blue)
      2 (green)
      3 (cyan)
      4 (red)
      5 (magenta)
      6 (yellow/brown)
      7 (white)
      8 (grey)
      9 (bright blue)
      A (bright green)
      B (bright cyan)
      C (bright red)
      D (bright magenta)
      E (bright yellow)
      F (bright white)
      Note: Bright background colours will be displayed as their dark equivalent.

      --
      It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    2. Re:Future capabilities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are my hero .... thanks for your reply; I know my BSOD experience will never be the same again!

    3. Re:Future capabilities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A privilege and a pleasure, sir.

  17. X-Box Emulator Site Down by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

    I think Mr. Gates put the hurt on that little venture

    1. Re:X-Box Emulator Site Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't it turn out to be a scam? I thought I heard everybody saying that it didn't actually play any of the games it purported to.

    2. Re:X-Box Emulator Site Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a hoax you f***ing moron!

  18. No longer a hoax?? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was first brought up several months ago in an article on The Register, but everyone widely dismissed it as a hoax.

    PC Format also covered it a few weeks ago, and people still dismissed it as a hoax.

    Now its on C|Net, is it still consired a hoax??? Or is it now a definite sign of things to come?

    1. Re:No longer a hoax?? by zudo · · Score: 1

      It just doesn't make sense for microsoft to release a new machine so soon! I pointed this out last time the "HomeStation" was discussed. It would lead to massive consumer confusion. Two very similar products from the same manufacturer would make it very hard to know which to buy. Why would you buy an xbox once homestation (which apparently does everything xbox does and more) is released anyway?

      It's far more likely that once microsoft has got a good grounding in the games market it will start marketing xbox as this sort of all in one entertainment device. All it really needs is a bit of software and a larger (external perhaps) hard disk. They need to establish themselves with gamers first though, and past failures of "multimedia" devices (3DO, CDTV, CDi) mean that if microsoft had marketed the xbox like this to start with gamers would most likely turn their backs.

      Perhaps not a hoax per say, more a misunderstanding.

    2. Re:No longer a hoax?? by posmon · · Score: 1

      and in the very next issue of pc format it was reported that microsoft had given up on the idea...

      --

      update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

    3. Re:No longer a hoax?? by alcmena · · Score: 2

      The 3DO (and I belive the CDi as well) was killed in large part because of the $500+ price tag when it came out in the early 90's. Lack of games didn't help it much either.

      Though, the 3DO was all sorts of cool. I still have one. It had the ability to chain controllers so you could have multiple controllers with only one port on the console. Also, the Goldstar controllers had headphone jacks in them. They could handle full motion video while the SNES was popular, and had some pretty neat CD playing screen savers.

      The 3DO was supposed to be saved by an external module that never came to be. That's one of the reasons people believe that if something (modem, hard drive, upgrade module, etc) didn't come with the console, it doesn't exist.

    4. Re:No longer a hoax?? by zudo · · Score: 1

      True enough, lack of games and high price tag had a lot to do with 3DO failing. I'm not comparing the xbox though, just pointing out that if they market it to sound like one of these failed boxes, gamers might see it like one and shy away from it.

      You're damn right about the 3DO, it was cool. The panasonic controllers had headphone jacks too, top idea. Still reckon 3DO Need for Speed is one of the best racing games ever.

      Ah, I remember M2, they turned it into a standalone unit for a bit, but that was never released either! You're right about console upgrades too. 32X and Sega CD anyone? Will be interesting to see if Sony can pull it off with their harddrive and broadband adator.

  19. Microsoft denies this by Arthur+Dent+75 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft Germany spokesman Boris Schneider-Johne has denied (apologies for the german link) to Heise that Microsoft is working on such a thing.

    --
    michael at slashdot.org: The real answer is that a couple of the slashdot authors are sick.
    1. Re:Microsoft denies this by dthable · · Score: 1

      Yeah...just like the denied working on a Java killer. M$ executives are the only people who lie more than lawyers.

    2. Re:Microsoft denies this by fedos · · Score: 1
      M$ executives are the only people who lie more than lawyers

      Microsoft execs are lawyers. They have to be; otherwise, how do they know where all the legal loopholes are?

    3. Re:Microsoft denies this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft denied the existence of the Xbox several times over before it was officially announced.

      MS denials mean nothing.

    4. Re:Microsoft denies this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C#/.net isn't a java killer. It was either infanticide (killed by Sun) or suicide.

  20. what about ... by s20451 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In addition to Xbox game compatibility and DVD functionality, it is reported to have TiVo/UltimateTV like PVR functionality as well as WebTV like email and web surfing capabilities.

    What about the rumored mind control capabilities? ... oh, TV ... never mind.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  21. How do they expect Xbox to become the HUB .. by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when you have to literally tear any nearby 12 yr olds off the black box to do something with it other than play DOA3?!

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  22. Gonna Party Likes It's 1975 by CrazyLegs · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ya know... When I hear about the XBox (or any other home-u-tainment product) is gonna do X once add-on Y hits the market, I can't help but recall my first stereo circa 1975. It was once of those integrated jobbies that did everything in one box, but did nothing particularly well.

    I just can't help thinking thinking that if I want the capabilities of a TIVO, DVD player, game console, etc. then I would just go to the manufactures would DO this stuff well and buy a TIVO, etc. etc.

    The XBox might be a fantastic piece of tech, but MS doesn't have a particularly good record in the consumer electronics market.

    --

    CrazyLegs

    "Pork!!" said the Fish, and we all laughed.

    1. Re:Gonna Party Likes It's 1975 by jtrascap · · Score: 1

      Agreed - so, you want a DVD player, HD recorder and game system? Oh wait - you say you want a GOOD DVD, HD player and game system? Then don't expect them in one generic box...

      It's the second law of the Universe all over again: The more you put things together, the more they fall apart!

    2. Re:Gonna Party Likes It's 1975 by asincero · · Score: 1

      > MS doesn't have a particularly good record in
      > the consumer electronics market.

      But they don't have a particularly bad one either. And the hardware they do produce (mice, keyboards, joysticks) are actually pretty good.

      - Arcadio

    3. Re:Gonna Party Likes It's 1975 by pben · · Score: 1

      Yes Microsoft doesn't have a particularly good record in consumer electronics. So be sure to wait for the third version. By then they will either own everything or finally hit their limits.

  23. Deja Vu all over again by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1
    The C|Net article is just a rehash of last week's PC Format article which in turn already spawned this discussion on Slashdot.

    That aside, show me another game console that can pull this off. Microsoft or not, this is a few years ahead of what Sony or Nintendo is going to be doing.

    1. Re:Deja Vu all over again by mrroot · · Score: 2

      That aside, show me another game console that can pull this off. Microsoft or not, this is a few years ahead of what Sony or Nintendo is going to be doing.

      Just what do you think Sony has been doing since the PS2 was released in Oct/Nov 2000?

      Sony holds their cards a little closer than Microsoft does and for good reason. I'm curious to see what they come up with.

      --
      I Heart Sorting Networks
    2. Re:Deja Vu all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sony holds their cards a little closer than Microsoft does and for good reason.

      Or: Sony are stingy, closed-source bastards who play with even less mates than M$ and invent stupid world-dominating technologies like MemoryStick and some weirdass audio format..."

  24. Interesting, smart move... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With the release of the Xbox as it is, it was a retarded move. They released a mediocre PC masquerading as a game console with mediocre games.

    The only extras were the DVD (Sony beat them here) and the MP3 ripping/playing.

    This isn't MS.

    Microsoft strategy is to bundle several mediocre implementations in one box, undercut the competition, and establish a monopoly.

    See MS Word vs. Wordperfect, Word got clobbered.
    Excel vs. 1-2-3, Excel got clobbered.

    Solution, sell "Office" for less than Wordperfect was individually? Boom, market yours.

    Look at the 3 consoles. PS2 wins if you want a quantity of games, period. If you are into renting new games all the time with lots of variety, you need a PS2.

    Gamecube has an amazing controller, tremendous graphics, and the best hardware in the business. (Blah, blah, blah, Mhz, blah, blah, blah, the Xbox processor is going to be slow compared to a customized PPC G3 with a game-taillored vector unit... think Altivec on crack in Photoshop shootouts... Intel only looks good in integer math... games don't do integer math...) Also it brings Nintendo's franchises, which are the best in the business.

    What does Xbox have? Hype? Newness?

    Microsoft needs to leverage more than their cash (willingness to lose $3 billion over three years to establish a presence is stupid... Atari, Nintendo, and Sony each dominated the market their first time out the door). There is no market openning now as there was Sony entered (3rd party hatred of Nintendo and Sega). The market loves Sony and the 25m-30m Nintendo fans love Nintendo.

    Microsoft needs to bundle:
    a mediocre DVD player
    a mediocre video game player
    a mediocre MP3 jukebox
    a mediocre PVR (VCR Replacement)

    and price them all at $300. I don't care about the specs, but they need to force families to think, "Sure the PS2 plays DVDs and games, but the MS Homestation does all this for the same price!"

    1. Re:Interesting, smart move... by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

      It might work like that. If your analogy held. While you can type a paper on both Office or Wordperfect, you definitatly cannot play Final Fantasy on both Xbox or PS2.

      There are just some games that will not be ported to the other platform. Halo? RE4 is a GC exclusive.

      I don't think that all the features in the world are going to make a difference, DVD playing is almost a moot feature anymore because DVD players are so cheap. If anything I think that it will just confuse most people.

      It's a VCR.
      It's a game player!
      Watch your movies on it.
      It makes you popcorn while you watch.

      What does the X-Box do anymore? I don't know, it's all just hype at this point.

      Real nerds are building their dream systems, not drooling over what you MIGHT be able to do with the X-Box. ( Or anything for that matter )

    2. Re:Interesting, smart move... by donglekey · · Score: 1

      Well done, I wish I had mod points, I think you just nailed it.

    3. Re:Interesting, smart move... by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      Gamecube has an amazing controller, tremendous graphics, and the best hardware in the business. (Blah, blah, blah, Mhz, blah, blah, blah, the Xbox processor is going to be slow compared to a customized PPC G3 with a game-taillored vector unit... think Altivec on crack in Photoshop shootouts... Intel only looks good in integer math... games don't do integer math...) Also it brings Nintendo's franchises, which are the best in the business.

      What does Xbox have? Hype? Newness?


      No, it has a better controller and the best GPU in the business. And Altivec in the Photoshop shootouts? Who cares. You actually have to write SIMD versions of the Intel code to have a fair comparison -- and those comparisons were done on raw MMX code. NOT the same.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    4. Re:Interesting, smart move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod parent down, it's filled with inaccuracies. Gamecube doesn't have Altivec, his analogy would never hold.

      He's an anti-Xbox fanboy, and that's all.

    5. Re:Interesting, smart move... by ruvreve · · Score: 1

      You make a great point. The average-consumer cares more about quantity then quality when deciding to purchase equipment like this. They don't have the commitment to research each device before they go and buy it. They walk into Best Buy/Circuit City compare boxes and see what has more crap in it. This is how compaq/hp actually (use to) compete in the low-end pc market. They give you tons of crap (scanner/printer...) with no concern for the quality.

    6. Re:Interesting, smart move... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

      DVD players aren't SO cheap. They are normally still in the $100-$150 range. That's chaep if you are a single 20-something with a $60k income in the computer industry. If you are a family of four with a family income of $45k, suddenly that disposable $100 is harder to come by.

      Exclusive games? Less important than you'd think.

      There are games.

      Gamers will pick systems on franchises. The rest won't.

      The rest of the world wants to sit down and play 1-2 times a week for 30 minutes, not read IGN and other web sites to figure out what games to dedicate the next 3 days of their lives too.

      I'm not a fan of the Xbox, but it could pass the "good enough" barrier that MS likes to hit.

    7. Re:Interesting, smart move... by russmay · · Score: 2, Funny

      > No, it has a better controller

      I must disagree with this, because while the NGC contoller fits like a glove for me, the XBox controller is like some sort of awkward chunk of plastic, desgined by sadistic Nazi scientists to twist my hands into misshapen claws that would scare children and cause soda pop to go flat.

      Of course, YMMV, but I like fizzy soda pop!

    8. Re:Interesting, smart move... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

      X-box has a custom SIMD by IBM. Motorola wrote Altivec for the G4. IBM wrote a custom SIMD for the G3. Same platform (PPC), similar idea (SIMD), years newer (IBM's implementation).

      I used Altivec as an example. Gamecube has its own SIMD implementation taht was designed with the particular instructions Nintendo asked to be implemented for gameplay. It is probably better than Altivec is because it is newer and custom.

      I'm anti-bullshit, and the Xbox is full of it.

      The greatest GPU in the world? Who cares? You're playing at 640x480x60 at best, I don't need a Nvidia Geforce-12000. I need a gaming system that can do innovative a new things. The Gamecube GPU is pretty good, maybe even comparable to the Nvidia one in the Xbox.

      We're all ASSUMING that the Xbox has the best GPU, as we are more familiar with Nvidia than the company that ATI bought. However, the Gamecube stuff apparently blows away ATI's in-house tech, and the ATI Radeon 8500 competes pretty well with the GeForce 3, so who the hell knows.

      Gamecube's hardware may be much better than Xbox and we won't know.

      However, it should be obvious to anyone taht has ANY background in microprocessor design (no, reading Tom's Hardware Guide or Anandtech is not an education, it's a benchmark shootout) that the Gamecube CPU will beat MS's clunky system.

      You're only as fast as your weakest link, so all MS's other advantages are relatively trivial.

      Alex

    9. Re:Interesting, smart move... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Well, for me, the GameCube controller is awkward; the symmetries are all wrong (two trigger buttons on the right, but only one on the left... what kind of crack were they smoking?), and the sticks themselves have sharp corners which dig into your fingers.

      Sure, it's not as bulky. But it feels cheap and nasty... a bit like finding a drill bit in a plush toy.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    10. Re:Interesting, smart move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a moron. The xbox has all around better hardware than the gamecube save the CPU. Hell, the xbox has hardware the gamecube doesn't even have. That's a significant advantage. However, the game development environment is more condusive to building games with depth than the gamecube.

      Do you even know the difference between levels and environments? Didn't think so. Play a game like halo and then try mario's mansion and compare the technology. I'm not talking about the graphics either, moron. Look deeper and lets see if you're smart enough to figure it out.

      The xbox = a game system of playing games with more depth than mortal combat. What a concept!

    11. Re:Interesting, smart move... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      You're playing at 640x480x60 at best
      No, YOU'RE playing at 640x480x60 at best. Me, I'm playing either on a computer monitor or a HDTV, and like the idea of increased resolution. The simple addition of a VGA adaptor let me take me DreamCast to work, plug it into the awesome digital projector, and have some real fun.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    12. Re:Interesting, smart move... by Bob+Dobbs · · Score: 2

      And my experience is just the opposite. The GameCube controller feels FAR too small. I end up feeling like I'm hitting several buttons at the same time, but the Xbox controller feels fine to me.

      I didn't like the Xbox controller when I tried it at one of the demo kiosks, but I think that has to do with the stiff plastic they use to attach them to the kiosks -- it forces you to hold it at a funky angle. Once I used the controller not attached to anything, it felt fine. It's rather similar to the Dreamcast controllers.

    13. Re:Interesting, smart move... by good-n-nappy · · Score: 1

      That raises an interesting question. I'm wondering if Microsoft could cross the line on reducing the price of this thing with that many features. I remember learning in 9th grade ELPSA that it is illegal for a big company to reduce the price of a product to the point of losing money specifically to drive another company out of business (maybe my teacher was on crack but that is how I remember it.)

      I'm sure there are a million loopholes in this law if it is even really a part of US law but I'm surprised it hasn't at least come up in an MS case.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of fiber.
    14. Re:Interesting, smart move... by filmcritic · · Score: 1, Informative

      They released a mediocre PC masquerading as a game console with mediocre games.

      How many God damn idiots are there in the world? For probably the 2 billionth time for those jackasses who haven't heard it.....THE XBOX IS NOT A PC.

      If it was a PC, how come no one has figured out how to do ANYTHING more that change the damn IDE cable in it?? If you call the Xbox a PC, I hope you consider ALL consoles PCs because they all have processors, motherboards, GPUs, RAM, etc. The fact is that they aren't PCs and they never will be. They are gaming machines for one purpose: to play games. That article is a fine piece of rumor-mongering for all the drooling idiots who want Microsoft to die.

      As for these "mediocre" games...I wonder how many of them that upstanding member of the anti-Microsoft mafia he has played? Probably none, or else he plays in secret, in fear that his fellow Linuxheads will find out. All consoles have good and bad games, its all a matter of personal taste, but this guy probably hasn't even played any.

    15. Re:Interesting, smart move... by SilentChris · · Score: 2

      How come this guy didn't get modded down? It's just a fanboy rant.

  25. Thank You by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Thank you for once again pointing out the idiotic bias of the editors of this site. Its not only dishonest, its an insult to the rest of us who like our reporting somewhat unvarnished (which should be everyone who graduated from high school).

    Unfortunately as the linux industry comes down from its 2001 high, sites like this are devolving into raw, unreasoned advocacy. check out comp.os.os2.advocacy circa about 1996 to see where /. is heading.

  26. Simpsons? by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who here started to read the article:

    "Prudential Securities analyst Hans Mosesmann, who covers graphics chip..."

    And thought, "huh?...Hans Moleman?"

    1. Re:Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just you, just you.

    2. Re:Simpsons? by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      I can't help thinking of the crossover Film Festival episode (with Jay Sherman/John Lovitz of The Critic) when I think of Hans Moleman.

      "And the Oscar goes to... George C. Scott in 'Football to the Groin'!"

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    3. Re:Simpsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Owww! My brains!"

  27. A Tivo that overheats? Oh that will sell well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to leave an XBox on 24/7 while it buffers my TV input through some add-on. I'm wondering how quick these units will die then.

  28. Not a MS specific bash... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2

    ... but there just seems to be a lot of hype about the abilities of these new machines. I'd wager that when released they'll have about 1/3 the proposed functionality. And that goes for anyone trying to produce these boxes, not just MS.

    Remember a few years ago when Sony claimed the PS2 would be a digital hub with all of these same capabilities? Funny how its now been pushed back to the PS3.

    It looks as if the bulk of what will make the MS unit work is going to rely on MS servers on the backend. Considering that they can't even deliver the software for their cable boxes on time I'd be real surprised if they can get this out in the next few years.

    Again, not a MS bash. If Sony, Sega, Panasonic, Scientific Atlanta, et al were making such huge claims I'd be bashing as well.

    1. Re:Not a MS specific bash... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 0

      You know what though, when Sony does completely make a digital hub (ps3 you say) it will be done right.

      I think there smart not to put to many features onto the ps2. DVD and gameplay is perfect for 2000 to 2004/5. If Sony had added other features that just turned out to be a waste (being the consumer didn't need/want it), they would be looking pretty lame plus wasted a lot of cash. Now they get to see if the linux hardrive does well or not and see what people like before the ps3 is out.

      Its about timing and Sony has it and MS does not.

    2. Re:Not a MS specific bash... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      yeah, MS just pushes right through stuff rather than be nimble....I think though that this little consumer electronics trip they are on will proove to be a bit that they can not chew...sort of like when you bit into that squishy rubbery thing in a boneless chicken brest....you just have to spit it out and give up.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  29. Re:idiot by fedos · · Score: 1
    Yes, I'm pretty sure Reckless knew who put the quotation marks into the write-up. He's asking why is the submitter putting those quotes in. Here's why:

    This analyst, Mosesmann, that the article uses as its source is rather suspect as an impartial source of information here. The first sentence says he works for Prudential and covers Nvidia chips. He then says that this Homestation is true and that it will most likely use an Nvidia chip. As someone else said, this sounds a lot like he's just boosting Nvidia stock.

  30. Will it run Internet Explorer? by fox8118 · · Score: 1
    If it is running a web browsing feature, chances are that Microsoft will want to run Internet Explorer on it.

    If so, will we be seeing the same security holes on the console that we see on the PC?

  31. Re: Beatrice by tiltowait · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The irony here being that Beatrice was later bought out by a bigger company (ConAgra).

    Other companies have changed their names as they grow (First Union bought out Wachovia, and took its name to boot).

    So yeah that Microsoft strategy is a good idea. I mean can you imagine if people knew there was a single company controlling something like: AOL, AOL Instant Messenger, AOL TV, Asiaweek, Atlanta Braves, Atlanta Hawks, Atlanta Thrashers, Atlantic Records, Baby Talk, Book-of-the-Month Club, Capitol Records, Cartoon Network, Castle Rock Entertainment, Cinemax, CNN, CNNfn, Coastal Living, Columbia House, Comedy Central, CompuServe, Cooking Light, Court TV, DC Comics, Digital City, eCompany Now, Elektra, EMI, Entertaindom.com, Entertainment Weekly, ESPN, Family Life, Fortune Magazine, Goodwill Games, Hanna-Barbera, HBO, Headline News, Health Magazine, ICQ, InStyle, Life Magazine, Little Brown, Looney Tunes, Mad Magazine, Money Magazine, MovieFone, Netscape, New Line Cinema, NY1 News, the Open Directory Project, People Magazine, Progressive Farmer, Qwest, Real Simple, Rhino, Road Runner, Southern Accents, Southern Living, Spinner, Sports Illustrated Magazines, Sunset, TBS, Teen People, Telepictures Productions, This Old House, Time Magazines, Time Warner Cable, TNT, Tommy Boy Music, Turner Classic Movies, Virgin Records, Warner Brothers Companies (Movies, Television Network, Video, Music, Stores), Winamp, and World Championship Wrestling. I mean really, that would be crazy.

  32. ... by vukv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All anti-ms feelings aside, It only makes sense for them to do so.. basically it is ultimatetv+xbox... they will need to add larger hard drive to it and maybe more CPU and ram but they will be able to charge more for it as well... and believe it or not, if they keep the price under 500$-600$, it will even be to the benefit of consumers... why pay for 700$ replaytv, when you can get similar features plus gaming console... only makes sense for them... hell, even I might considered getting one as long as pvr features are good

  33. Jolly! by SevenTowers · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't help but picture the futuristic house: a .net passport to access your house, then you use MS voice recognition to start your X-box controlled blender ("start blender") and it opens the start menu on your tivo. You go to the bathroom and realise that the toilet paper was used up by the MS house maid when the washing machine crashed because some idiot DOSed it. No problem, the X-Box terminal in the bathroom has already sent a message through MSN to MS toilet HQ, and the delivery is on the way.

    Then some script kiddie uses a widely-known-but-little-repaired-exploit (TM) and bluescreens your house. You have to go down to the basement (again!), unplug the internet cable, unplug the power cable, short the solders on your Microsoft House BIOS, reinstall House XP 2005...

    wazoo....

    --
    Imperium et libertas
    Autocracy and freedom
  34. After the home xBox ... by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

    The next step is a "business xBox", with Office, upgradeable via .NET; license fees paid annually to Microsoft; and no ability whatsoever to allow the installation or use of other applications on the machine. Rather like the dedicated word-processing machines in the 1980s.

    Businesses that do not want to give the full power of PCs to employees would welcome that kind of device, if it was cheap enough and if they could be reassured that Microsoft was not accessing their confidential information (that last one is a big if to us, but remember how popular Gates is outside the tech industry).

  35. Does this mean microsoft is transforming? by f00zbll · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It would appear this is all part of a broader change at Microsoft led by Balmer? These kinds of development could be an indication of where PC technology is going in the future and how it will infiltrate other markets.

    Personally, I like this movement for several reasons.

    1. for a PC to become a consumer product, the operating system has to be rock solid
    2. for PC hardware manufacturers it means more markets and therefore possibility lower the cost of production and development
    3. for the consumer, the PC-ness of computers will begin to disappear and become transparent

    If this trend is for real and the drive is more than just fad, it bodes well for computer users. Not only will this mean better stability, but lower prices.

    On the otherhand, microsoft could hit a huge wall and realize how hard it is to build a truly reliable operating system and decide to back out. I doubt that will happen for a couple reasons. Microsoft's goals are to maximize share holder value and please the analysts. In order to do that, they have to diversify and expand the markets to minimize the impact of PC consumer demands. Considering the resources Microsoft has at its' disposal, it just might pull it off.

  36. Re:Thank You -- offtopic, I'll take the karma hit by jgerman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Then go somewhere else you pretentious jackass. This site is free, and you complain about it as if you're paying a monthly subscription. If you don't like the way things are discussed here, go elsewhere. I'm getting more than a little sick of seeing the 'holier than thou' posts that have sprung up more and more frequently over the last year or so. You act like you are owed something from the editors of this site. Or perhaps you have nothing better to do than troll around the weblogs all day.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  37. Developers? by JohnG · · Score: 2
    X-Box developers told Microsoft in no uncertain terms in the beginning that they were NOT interested in developing for an entertainment hub. So what remains to be seen is, when MS forces the entertainment hub on them through the backdoor like this, will they bend over and take it, or walk away.

  38. because, personally, I think it's a leak by rtphokie · · Score: 1
    Settle down, settle down

    I call it a "report" because It appears to me to be more Microsoft leak than an independent report. Many ./'ers take on Microsoft hatred as their pet peave, for me, it's bad journalism.

    The timing of it is what leads me to beleive this. This is why I included the information about Moxi. Bill and company probably wern't very happy about all the ink Moxi got from CES especially since the founder also created WebTV before Microsoft bought them. Moxi was very secretive about their products before pulling back the curtain on them at CES. They even set up their company Rearden Steel to keep things as hush hush as possible.

    I'm no Microsoft hater (or Mac or Linux or whatever for that matter). I prefer to be technologically agnostic, something often sadly missing from ./

    1. Re:because, personally, I think it's a leak by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 2

      Haha, yeah I was really just curious. Didn't mean to jump to conclusions. I just wasn't clear that you were trying to make the point that the report was released purposely to detract from the Moxi story. It's certainly prudent to have a critical eye toward product announcements. It just seemed overly cynical when, in my view, the gist of the story was that something useful was going to be produced based on the XBox - an unfairly maligned product (IMO).

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
  39. This could be awesome... by lythander · · Score: 1

    Combine this with their announced Mira and Freestyle technologies, and I could digitally record every episode of whatever, store it on my PC then spool it wirelessly to a flatpanel touchscreen. Who needs to pause TV when you can just carry it to the toilet with you?

  40. Re: Beatrice by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

    All the above are correct except World Championship Wrestling. The WWF bought the WCW trademark and their tape library.

  41. XBOX and Bill's said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i remember back in the days of the 286 this same idea being bandied around. Look at Web-TV (cough sucks). Microsoft has been pushing this forever and if we decide that we want e-mail, surfing on our TV then it will happen. I'm of the opinion that it will not.

    1. Re:XBOX and Bill's said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long ago did you stop using 286's? I mean they first came out in 1982 and were replaced by 386's in 1985. That's like the MS-DOS 2.0 days. Even Windows 1.0 didn't come out until 1985. TCP/IP, DNS, NNTP were all babies in those days.

    2. Re:XBOX and Bill's said it before by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that TCP/IP is a tad bit older than that....

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  42. Stop with the Swiss Army Knife! by laetus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sure, this thing might be nice in the living room. But you know what I'm really looking for? A small terminal in several rooms in my house where I can access my email, IM, and the web.

    And I don't want a $1000 PC in each room.

    When is someone going to create a credible web terminal with a small keyboard and an LCD screen that I can hookup to my DSL or Cablemodem and not have to pay MS or Compaq monthly fees for connecting to their network?

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:Stop with the Swiss Army Knife! by donglekey · · Score: 2

      This is a very good point and something that I have thought about from time to time. People ask the questions "What are they going to do with all that power, no on needs it" (which really frustrates me when I see the near sightedness) and also (what is Linux doing for the desktop/home market). If some company would just get it together and create a Linux server/terminal for the home it could be huge. One bigger computer in the basement, gigabit ethernet over standard cat-5, and cheap terminals (think small flat panel or something) everywhere you want a computer. Everything runs on the basement computer so everyone gets their e-mail, their shared mp3's, their shared internet, and their buisness apps, yet everyone has a computer in their room. If someone would just fuckin' tie it all together, they could really do great things with this polished consumer version of Unix we have been blessed with.

    2. Re:Stop with the Swiss Army Knife! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean have a central server and lots of dummy terminals running off of that server? Wow. Now nobody every thought of that before.

    3. Re:Stop with the Swiss Army Knife! by laetus · · Score: 2

      It's not the idea of dummy terminals. It's the idea of where do you BUY such a terminal? Compaq had the Ipaq internet appliance, but you had to subscribe to a particular ISP to use it. What I'm looking for (and I think alot of other people are too), is an appliance that has something like DHCP so I just plug it in and off I go to the web. Small, compact like the Compaq appliance, but not tied to a particular ISP.

      --

      "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    4. Re:Stop with the Swiss Army Knife! by PMan88 · · Score: 1

      get a laptop, wireless card, and an access point. you can move around, iming, emailing, and surfing. and since it's a separate thing, you can watch tv or play video games while on the internet.

  43. an opportunity the Penguin... by xpiotr · · Score: 1

    Why not look at this like a opportunity to make the linux-killer-application: LinuxTV

    Nokia is working on something called Nokia MediaTerminal which is based on Linux.

    (Sorry, only found this link in Swedish, but then again this is good time to learn and "Linux" is the same in Swedish :-)

  44. Re:piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could a woman be "better qualified" in keeping your pointer in tip-top condition than another human being equipped with a similar pointer?

  45. Crash on keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will also run MS new voice recongition software and crash on words like linux or sony... Hmm even better it will start playing a locally stored MS commercial over top fo the other one explaining why it is much better then anything else on the market

  46. so how is Sony any different ? by sh0rtie · · Score: 2, Insightful


    "People are going to suddenly wake up and realize the the MS logo is on their computer, tv's, vcr's/dvr's, video games, toddler toys, kitchen appliances, car electroncs, etc

    but people havent woken up to Sony yet , Sony are just about the only company that can complete the circle from not only producing the Artists that make the media (and the equipment they use to create it) to delivering it to the consumers eyes/ears on their Sony stereo/TV/computer/etc yet people still shower them with praise and dont feel they are a monopoly, even microsoft are not in Sonys exclusive position

    1. Re:so how is Sony any different ? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      I'd say that's because you can get music that isn't produced by Sony, you can get stereos/CD players/mixers/whatever that aren't produced by Sony, etc. They don't have a virtual monopoly on what you see and hear. (Unless of course you haven't left the chair in front of your monitor for days because you're an EQ addict, but then if you are one of them, you aren't reading this.)

      It's already been determined that M$ has a monopoly, and has used their practices to force other business to "do their bidding". Now, they are producing and heavily marketing items that fall outside of their previous "competency", OSes. It should scare people that the same company that has a virtual stranglehold on the OS market is trying to get involved in so many other aspects of modern appliances. Okay, no M$ brand soda yet, but they're trying to wire the fridge. No M$ pizzas, but they want to hook up the microwave.

      And with their horrible record regarding security, I don't think I want my appliances hooked up to something that could be pretty easily hacked and set to self-destruct in some odd way.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:so how is Sony any different ? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2


      but people havent woken up to Sony yet , Sony are just about the only company that can complete the --snip--

      Well, you can CHOOSE not to use Sony. I have for just this reason. I buy an occasional CD that comes from a Sony artist but anything else I own that's Sony-made has been bought secondhand. I don't like their corporate culture, their proprietary stance and I don't like their pervasiveness. Not buying new Sony-branded stuff hasn't made my life bad.

    3. Re:so how is Sony any different ? by BurritoJ · · Score: 1

      Sony could possibly be described as a vertical monopoly. They own a significant portion of their own supply chain. This is different than a horizontal monopoly where one company owns most of one specific market. Both monopolies can be abused, but a vertical monopoly is more likely to manifest itself as less expensive and/or higher quality products for the consumer. This is because there is still competition at the consumer level and the vertical monopoly has the advantage of not paying any markup on its raw materials.
      The only leverage a horizontal monopoly is the economies of scale and being the only game in town. Neither of these are beneficial to the consumer.

    4. Re:so how is Sony any different ? by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Sony has their fingers in many more pots than Microsoft, but they don't have a monopoly in any one market like Microsoft does with PC operating systems. That's the big difference! You're really comparing apples to oranges.

      Sure, Sony likes to be all proprietary whenever possible with their memory sticks, etc, etc, but they're not in a monopoly position so in my mind it's okay, because you can choose to avoid them (or at least those sony products which embrace proprietary standards).

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    5. Re:so how is Sony any different ? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Sony is perilously close to achieving a monopoly in the supply of broadcast television electronics. This has been achieved simply because Sony spend so much on R&D, they've been leading the market for decades.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  47. Re: Beatrice by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Small nitpick - ESPN is owned by Disney, which in turns controls:
    • ABC Television Network, several television stations (WABC, KABC, WLS, WPVI, KGO, KTRK, WTVD, KFSN, WJRT, WTVG), Buena Vista, ABC Radio Network, several radio stations (WABC, WPLJ, KABC, KSPN, KDIS, KLOS, WLS, WMVP, WRDZ, WPJX, WZZN, KGO, KSFO, KMKY, WWJZ, KMKI, WBAP, KSCS, KMEO, KESN, WJR, WDRQ, WDVD, WMAL, WJZW, WRQX, KMIC, WMYM, WDWD, WKHX, WYAY, KKDZ, KDIZ, KQRS, KXXR, WGVX, WGVY, WGVZ, KMIK, WSDZ, WEAE, WWMI, KADZ, KDDZ, WWMK, WKMI, WIID, WDDZ, WGFY, WDYZ, WMNE, WDZY, WDZK), investments in A&E, Lifetime, E! Entertainment Television, The History Channel, ABC Internet Operations, ABC Family, Disney Channel, Disney Channel International, Toon Disney, SoapNet, Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, Miramax Films, Dimension Films, Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Buena Vista Music Group, Walt Disney Records, Walk Disney Music Publishing, Hollywood Records, Mammoth Records, Lyric Street Records, Buena Vista Theatrical Group, Animated Walt Disney Television, Animated Buena Vista Television, Disneylant Resort, Walt Disney World Resort, Tokyo Disney Resort, Disneyland Resort Paris, Disney Vacation CLub, Disney Cruise Line, ESPN Zone, Walt Disney Imagineering, Mighty Ducks (NHL), Anaheim Angels (MLB), 25 Hotels, Toys, Apparel, Hyperion Books, Disney Store.com

    But it's an easy mistake to make.

  48. Media is the next move by whynot4 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has already established itself as the vendor of consumer software. The media seems to be the next logical step. Think about it. What companies are successful (successful==profitable most of the time)? The companies that market directly to consumers (Wal-Mart, Coca Cola, Disney, et. al).

    I've been saying it for the last 18 months to my colleagues: Microsoft will change itself into a media giant. Why? So they can beat out AOL/Time Warner and be the mega corporation. The Xbox and UltimateTV are only the first steps. .NET will find its way into our televisions before too long and before we know it, we won't be paying any more mind to it as some people do the Timex logo on their wristwatch.

    --
    So you don't think you need to pay for things? Good luck with that.
    1. Re:Media is the next move by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      that works great in the consumer goods market, but what about the business goods market? i would consider software more of a business good than a consumer good. consumer generally don't directly pay for software. either it's bundled in their new pc, or they steal it.

      take a look at companies who make their bread and butter selling to consumers (computer games, minor desktop publishing (greeting cards, etc). none step out as huge successfull companies. on the other side, successfull companies who sell to business are inheritantly household names (oracle, microsoft, even redhat)

    2. Re:Media is the next move by whynot4 · · Score: 1

      How many Xbox's is your enterprise going to buy to run their business? =)

      I agree with you that software is more business geared than to the consumer in most instances. However, Microsoft is targetting the consumer market as what will thrust them into the media/content/home electronics/toys/etc arena.

      My mom doesn't give a damn about Oracle or RedHat or id. She knows that when she turns on her computer, she sees the Microsoft logo. That's what runs her software and lets her use her computer (appliance).

      The examples you mentioned are involved with the computer industry. Microsoft is looking beyond that; they want to get into more of the arena I mentioned above. Who knows? You may someday see the Microsoft logo on a jar of peanut butter.

      --
      So you don't think you need to pay for things? Good luck with that.
  49. Forget XBox - bring on the MOXI by maj12_lovebuzz · · Score: 0

    Who do I have to kill to get one of these? Anyone know what OS it runs?

  50. ESPN is not AOL(tw) by yerricde · · Score: 1

    a single company controlling something like: AOL ... Time Warner ... ESPN

    No. ESPN is Disney, the other company we love to hate thanks in no small part to the late Sonny Bono, and ESPN.go.com is Disney and Microsoft.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  51. Re:Thank You -- offtopic, I'll take the karma hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well lets turn it right around at you...why don't you bugger off you yes-man, group-think twit? yes, all you are doing is hiding in the group-think of slashdot. how brave of you.

  52. Can MS pull the Sony trick on Sony? by rgold · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It should be fun to watch the fireworks if MS comes to market with a homestation product in the fall.

    Sony was the first to try such a thing with it's PS1. It saw that a video game machine with additional functionality might be appeal to the "mass market", mostly adults without children who hadn'y been interested in a home console until that point. The PS1 played audio CD's and was thought of by sony as a component of the Sony "Home entertainment" vision and not as a dedicated game machine.

    With that approach, the PS1 conquered the mass market. It took less than two years for the ps1 to penetrate 10% of American homes. By comparison, it took color TV 13 years, 11 for the VCR and 6 for audio CDs.

    Now Microsoft is trying to do the same thing with a different set of functionality. Seems like a good idea, but it's a very different world now.

    Game consoles are no longer just a niche. 32% of US homes have one sort of console or another. Sony is by far the market leader, and the PS2 is backwards compatable with a huge PS1 base. Whats more, it also plays DVDs. Microsoft will have to price their homestation offering well over the PS2 (or suffer huge losses). It will be interesting to see if consumers are interested in the functionality for the price.

    Meanwhile, Nintendo has stayed true to it's fmaily oriented niche and remains by far the most profitable of the players from a pure video game approach. And while all activity is happening in the "Home Entertainment" world, Nintendo is virtually unchallnged on the handheld side with its gameboy and gameboy advance. GBA is projected to become a 500 million dollar business this year!

    If I had to choose right now, I'd rather be Nintendo...

    -rg

  53. "rumored mind control capabilities" by dpilot · · Score: 1

    In another announcement,

    Microsoft has recruited as a new Research Associate, Edward Nigma, of Gotham City.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  54. Simple by xSterbenx · · Score: 1
    What ever happened to just plain old 'game consoles'? Perhaps I am in the minority here, but when I buy a ps2/gamecube/xbox/whatever, i do so to play games, not to browse the internet, not to play dvd's, not to record tv shows. Perhaps that appeals to those who are on a tighter budget, but lets face it, if I am going to watch dvd's, i'm going to watch them on a real dvd player with more features and better quality than the built in one for the ps2 or xbox. For that matter, it costs $30+ just to get the s-video adapter for the ps2 and $20+ for the dvd remote control.

    IMHO, if you want a computer, buy a computer, if you want a dvd player, buy a dvd player, and if you want a game console, buy a game console. If you try and put them all together into one box, you are going to lose quality.

  55. Let me get this straight... by CrazyBrett · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So they're introducing an all-in-one device that will allow you to:

    1. Play games
    2. Play DVDs
    3. Watch TV
    4. Surf the web
    5. Write email

    Gee, that sounds an awful lot like my computer!

    So why do they bother? First and foremost, because this is their opportunity to control the one thing they've been unable to get so far: the hardware. Now they will finally be able to implement their digital rights infringement, etc, without fear of pushing the user away (after all, who in their right mind would give up using a piece of hardware after they paid $1000+ for it).

    There's more to this scheme, however. Take a closer look at the list of activities shown above. Notice the absence of any kind of development, programming, hacking, etc. The long term goal of this strategy is to "phase out" these kinds of activities, because they are dangerous to the Microsoft monopoly. Eventually, they want everyone's recreational activities to be limited to the 5 items listed above (give or take a few).

    Impossible, you say? Not with a little careful manipulation of the market. I'd estimate that 90% of the PC market these days are our beloved Joe Sixpacks, who simply want to do items 1-5, nothing more. Instead of trying to sell general purpose hardware and then customize it with the software (OS), they will start selling customized hardware, which will have only 10% less market share than PCs. With a "good" marketing campaign (which we know MS is capable of), they can strike a huge blow to the general purpose PC business, which will either drive it out of existence, or drive prices way up. Either of these outcomes will make PCs virtually inaccessible to consumers. Over the long term, consumers will lose interest in hacking/development. It might take an entire generation, but it will happen.

    Thanks for tuning in.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Brendor · · Score: 1

      this may be a bit off topic but, as I read about MS's current crop of plans that will supposedly take a generatiion to unfold, I can't help but wonder how much of this will be possible once Gates/Ballmer are retired. Gates is 47. He won't be running the company 20 years from now. Can MS function without its fearless leader?

    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you halfway. (I just wrote this above, but I'll repeat it here). What I really think Microsoft will do is divide the PC market into 2 segments: The business and home PC. The business PC will continue to exist as it does today. The home PC will be closed with all the sorts of controls you listed. The content creators will then only distribute content in an encrypted form that can be used by the closed system.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight... by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "Over the long term, consumers will lose interest in hacking/development. It might take an entire generation, but it will happen."

      And the problem with this is?...

      Joe Sixpack doesn't want to hack. He doesn't want set up users with less permissions than him. He doesn't want to decode the assembly instructions used to craft a window in X. He doesn't want to waste time learning how to defrag or fsck a hard drive.

      He wants to do those 5 things, and he isn't interested in having to take apart a device to do it. No other consumer device *in the world* is anything like a PC. There's a reason why they're so darn hard to "make easier" -- they're *too* configurable.

      So Microsoft makes an all-purpose box that needs little maintenance, and Dell, Gateway, IBM, and Compaq/HP follow suit. Big deal. There will still be computers for us "regular hackers". They will be just as configurable: like Hot Rods versus your standard Buick. We, as techies, shouldn't *force* our culture onto everyone else (for some reason, we feel like we have a right to).

    4. Re:Let me get this straight... by Don+Negro · · Score: 2

      And the problem with this is?...

      My father could easily be classified as Joe Sixpack in this context. (He has a ham radio licence and builds model airplanes, but never got into computers.)

      If we'd had an unhackable computer-like device, my life would be really different, instead we had a Vic-20 and an Apple IIe.

      --

      Don Negro
      Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

    5. Re:Let me get this straight... by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Nope.
      So many people are overestimating the power of the dark side here. The fact is, hardware leads software by the nose and the vast majority of PC hardware comes from Taiwanese companies based in China. Full-on PCs that can do all of this entertainment stuff will only get cheaper and cheaper. Same goes for the terminal concept. Skip it, full fledged PCs will cost less than terminals. Boards with sound/3dvideo/ethernet for a hundred bucks are old news already and RAM isn't getting any more expensive any time soon. CPUs? Hah.
      What I want to see is on-board 1200watt audio amps with an array of speaker outputs. It's just another transistor and a little crossover circuitry.
      Current DVD is lame. Sony has already demo'd 100Gig DVDs. MS will get nowhere with hardware. They're getting into competition in a market where brothers fight each other to the death now that they're sleeping with NVidia. A bloated monopoly can't cut it in graphics hardware for long.

  56. Re:Thank You -- offtopic, I'll take the karma hit by plumby · · Score: 1

    I agree with you about the amount of people posting that /. is crap, etc. They don't have to read the site.

    But he does have a valid concern about bias. The site may be free, but it does have influence. A lot of people read the site, and (I suspect) are swayed by content on it. If the people running the site decide to present biased news, then this could have a significant effect on opinions within the IT community. In the same way, I complain about the biased news presented on TV and in the newspapers. I'm not complaining that I have wasted my money on a newspaper with junk news in (that's my option to buy/not but it), but I do complain when the media's spin on news controls public opinion.

    On the other hand, however, I don't think there IS that much bias in /., I'm just pointing out that complaining about bias has nothing to do with whether you personally choose to look at the site or not.

  57. Entertainment hub VS. Digital hub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could be a long shot, but any chance that they're trying to make Xbox the center of home entertainment as soon after Apple announced their new iMac the center of their digital devices?

  58. "reinstall House XP 2005" by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Dateline 2005:

    Joe Sixpak was found dead in his home today, of dehydration. Apparently in the process of reinstalling his HomeStation after it had been cracked, he passed away awaiting new activation codes from User Support. Without the activation codes, faucets.Net wouldn't deliver water, refrigerator.Net wouldn't open to provide fluids, and lock.Net wouldn't let him out of the house.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  59. Sweet!!! by Rostoff · · Score: 1

    Linus signed my X-Box! ^_^

  60. Re: Beatrice by MarkLR · · Score: 2

    In Canada on CNN, AOL Time Warner runs a "aren't we great" ad that basically does just that. It lists: AOL, CNN, CNN Headline News, TSB, TNN, Tuner Classic Movies, Time, Warner Brothers, New Line Cinema, Netscape and maybe others. I think it should be Exhibit A in any Microsoft defense any against the charge that they are attacking, Netscape - the little guy.

  61. Re:The diference between Homestation and MoxiBoxi. by MarkLR · · Score: 1

    Moxi says that they will be using Linux which is interesting for a company founded by the man behind MS's WebTV.

  62. Why one box by hardill · · Score: 1

    I might be missing something here but why would you want one box that does all this?

    Modern games require vast amounts of processor time for the graphics and AI's that gamers demand and on the other side video encoding codexs are pretty processor intensive as well. Taking all this into account what happens when your mid game and the PVR function deciedes that your missing you favourty program and kicks in to record it? It finds it's got no RAM to use as a buffer and no CPU time as little billy is busy beating up the end of level boss in this months top of the game chart?

    If all this has been separated out then you don't get these conflicts and you can upgrade/replace each part as and when needed.

    Just my 2p

    1. Re:Why one box by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 2

      First of all, trying to encode the video in software would be moronical. My theory: there's a hardware chip with its own dedicated memory that takes care of that. It then sends the data straight to the hard drive with almost no help from the CPU. There's also a hardware chip that handles video decoding, so full streaming media can be done while the CPU is full tilt into some other task. I can't think of any game that uses 100% CPU. If the operating system is designed with a realtime scheduler, the video subsystem can demand that its necessary CPU power is given to it. Since gaming is less important, it might drop speed by a few fps to handle sending the video to the disk.

      "One box to rule them all...and in the darkness bind them"

  63. More than three consoles by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Look at the 3 consoles. PS2 wins if you want a quantity of games, period.

    Four.

    Nintendo currently sells two consoles: the GameCube, and the 32-bit Game Boy Advance. (Yes, the GBA is a console. It has twice the power of Super NES, and a third party makes a TV adapter.) The GBA can play over a thousand official games, including games designed for Game Boy and Game Boy Color. (Are there more Game Boy games or more PS1 games?) That doesn't even count the demos and mini-games that any C programmer can develop and run on the system with a flash card or $50 link cable.

    Gamecube has an amazing controller

    I agree, but a fellow has to admit that it's a copy of PlayStation's with the L1 button removed, the L2 and R2 buttons made analog (like Dreamcast), and the left pad and stick interchanged.

    Intel only looks good in integer math... games don't do integer math

    Yes, 3D games are mostly floating-point, but 2D games (such as ports of some arcade fighting games) use integer math, and game AI uses heavy integer math.

    Microsoft needs to bundle: a mediocre DVD player, a mediocre video game player

    Microsoft currently sells this for $330 (XBox + DVD dongle).

    a mediocre MP3 jukebox

    Well within the XBox's capability, but Microsoft would rather use the WMA format than what some journalists have termed "Music Piracy 3".

    a mediocre PVR (VCR Replacement)

    So you're proposing an XBox + Ultimate TV combo deck. It'll be a while before Microsoft can get costs down to put the price below $300.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:More than three consoles by Nerds · · Score: 2

      Gamecube has an amazing controller

      I agree, but a fellow has to admit that it's a copy of PlayStation's with the L1 button removed, the L2 and R2 buttons made analog (like Dreamcast), and the left pad and stick interchanged.


      I usually try not to get caught up in these conversations, but this really annoys me. The PlayStation controller is a complete rip off of the SNES controller, invented by Nintendo, with handles and two shoulder buttons on each side instead of one. The d-pad, the four button setup, analog sticks, trigger buttons, all of this was done by Nintendo first. I wouldn't even be surprised if the original PSX contoller had been developed by Nintendo, since they were in on the design of that unit, but I'm not sure.

      In any case, Nintendo has led the way in controller design from the very start. As far as I'm concerned, putting the analog stick in a good spot for the left thumb was a great move, since it's the default in most new games. Also, as far as the analog shoulder buttons go, yes, the DC had those first, but but the GameCube's are so much more comfortable (besides, the N64 was the first to use a trigger, but I'm not sure if it was analog).

      --
      My other .sig is 'The Art of Computer Programming'
  64. Even More Chances for Crashing! by WickywiK · · Score: 1

    Oh, boy. I can't wait to be in the middle of my favorite video game while recording my favorite TV show when the crappy thing hangs up. Maybe MS can create a colorful error screen that informs the user that they "get" to start their game at his/her last save point (you did save recently, didn't you) and that they will need to catch the remainder of the show you were recording in three weeks when they repeat it.

  65. Re:Beatrice? NO WAY by Migx · · Score: 1

    NO Way :P Macintosh will live and continue giving me the chance of having a computer that works @ home. I "use Sun" @ work (big telecomunications company), so no worries there, MS and Intel don't stand a chance in the "professional market", where reboot's have other costs besides getting you bored.

    --
    Migx
  66. good controllers by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

    Hey, maybe this time they can make some good controllers that fit the human hand.

    1. Re:good controllers by mh_tang · · Score: 1

      Otherwise the terrorists have already won!

  67. Opening the floodgates to independent dev? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If it is running a web browsing feature, chances are that Microsoft will want to run Internet Explorer on it. If so, will we be seeing the same security holes of the console that we see on the PC?

    This might be how some reverse engineer cracks a future version of the XBox and runs its own code on the system, opening the floodgates to independent software development. Microsoft does not want this to happen. Ever.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  68. Re: Beatrice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, Disney owns Disney Vacation club? Noooo.

  69. Say goodbye to free software by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Personally, I like this movement for several reasons ... for the consumer, the PC-ness of computers will begin to disappear and become transparent

    Yes, but what if Microsoft releases a closed system that developers have to pay big bucks to get into? (They already have: XBox.) Say goodbye to free software if PCs begin to head in that direction.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Say goodbye to free software by f00zbll · · Score: 1

      Then developers will go some place else and microsoft will loose market share. What company is gonna want to fork over say 500K to get developer access, if they are servicing a nitch market. With Balmer at the head, I doubt that will happen, since he's been screaming "developers, developers, developers." Microsoft is greedy, but not stupid. I doubt they'll price themselves out of competition.

    2. Re:Say goodbye to free software by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      What is more likely is that Microsoft is trying to divide the pie into two segments and PC types: business and home. The business type will continue to be an open system with the ability to inexpensively develop software and add hardware from anyone. The home type will be a closed system and be designed to play games, handle entertainment and other media, and surf the internet. Because it is a closed system, this home PC can have some sort of content protection. The media producers need this before they'll support any PC media scheme. (Also, a closed system can be made more stable).

  70. PCs can already do all this by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    A PC has been more than capable of "TiVo", and every other functionality that this box is planned to do for years. I've always wondered why no OEM ever decided to sell systems with capture cards or All-in-Wonder type setups. But, I'm pretty sure I already know the answer to that question.

    Every PC maker yearns for a killer app, which as anyone who has ever done so knows, MPEG-2 capture+encoding is a processor, memory, and HDD performance hog. Video editing and encoding is probably the only thing that sells >80GB HDDs.

    Yet, there aren't many, if any, OEMs pushing this application for fear of making the Movie/TV cartel angry. But hey, on a X-Box that is secure against users using it, I'm sure this will just explode.

    --
    Special note for trolls: If such PC setups are "difficult to setup" or some other nonsense, then maybe you should notice that I'm talking about OEMs. Joe Twelvepack isn't an OEM.

    1. Re:PCs can already do all this by Thag · · Score: 2
      Yet, there aren't many, if any, OEMs pushing this application for fear of making the Movie/TV cartel angry. But hey, on a X-Box that is secure against users using it, I'm sure this will just explode.


      Apple has at least one Mac/Imac which is set up to do video capture/editing out of the box and now I think they even bundle it with a DVD burner. If you like Macs. There are probably people doing bundles on the PC side if you know where to look.

      Jon Acheson
      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  71. Re: Beatrice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does it seem that (in general) technology companies want to convey the image that they are huge, while more traditional companies prefer to obscure their size by hiding behind dozens of different brand names? AOLTW is interesting because they're a mix of both worlds... AOL seems to like putting their logo on everything.

  72. Re:piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely brilliant trolling. I haven't had such a good laugh in a long time.

  73. Reality Cross-Checking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft is taking their XBox (which has yet to come up with a really compelling out-of-box selling point), their Ultimate TV ("we're better than TiVo, but we're not sure how"), and WebTV (ha ha ha) and put them all in one box and expect it to be successful?

    Heck, if my ATI All-In-Wonder recorder actually worked with XP, we'd already *have* this. Without that high-pitched whine that TVs give off, too... (not to mention the least compatibility-tested web browser in the world.)

  74. Re:Question by posmon · · Score: 1

    i think your asp problems are probably due to the fact that intBrwID is treated as a local variable in the process sub.

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  75. This is (somewhat) old news... by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates himself announced and described this in his keynote address at CES a week ago. It's all part of the Microsoft hegemony for world domination, which de rigeur must include control of all devices in the home. Soon you won't be able to take a crap in your own networked toilet without a toilet network service license from Microsoft entitling you to do so. And don't even think of taking an unlicensed crap, or the BSA will come after you.

    Don't know about you, but I can't wait!

  76. Re:piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT, YHL, HAND.

  77. Re:I'm "sick" of the "quote" marks by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed the proclivity of mom and pop type operations to excessively use quotation marks in bizarre and confusing ways? i.e. In a laundromat you'll see `"NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOST OR STOLEN CLOTHING"' '"MANAGEMENT"': What does that mean???? As you mentioned, quotes either imply sarcasm, or the author's doubt about the voracity of a statement, so when you see quotations used around basic, obvious claims it really is perplexing.

    DOWN WITH QUOTATION MARKS!

  78. Entertainment hub? by Grape+Shasta · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't help thinking about Jon Katz's artice about iMacs yesterday. I think his point was that Apple should abandon their strategy of trying to create a digital hub for entertainment, and instead be more like Microsoft? Hmmmmm....

    --

    "I am a cipher, a cipher, wrapped in an enigma, smothered in secret sauce" -Jimmy James
  79. Nah, GBA is separate by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    I love my GBA. It isn't a substitute. It's awesome, has a monopoly on the handheld market, but it isn't in the same competition as the others. You don't see people deciding between a GBA and GCN, or a GBA and PS2. If you want a handheld, you get a GBA.

    The games rock, its a money-maker for Nintendo, etc. However, it isn't competition for home systems.

    I won't grant that the Gamecube controller is a rip-off of the Playstation's controller.

    To me it is a natural evolution.

    The Playstation's controller was a rip-off of the SNES controller that got extra shoulder pads and LATER analog sticks (after they ripped the idea off Nintendo).

    The Gamecube controller is very clearly derivative of the N64's controller. The left hand options before (D-pad + L, or Analog + Z) have been merged into (D-pad OR Analog) + L with the added bonus of the D-pad and Analog both being usable with an easy switch.

    The button layout on the right is the SNES layout reoriented around the reality of a primary button (A), secondary button (B) and optional extra buttons (X, Y).

    The SNES had four equal buttons, but they were rarely uses as such.

    The Z-button? It's a hack tacked on at the last minute for people worried about losing a button. There it is, developers, please don't use it much.

    Analog shoulder pads, brilliant new invention (like N64's analog stick, SNES's shoulder pads, and NES's D-pad) that everyone will copy.

    C-stick, it's neat. An adaption of the C-buttons into a stick. The C-buttons had the advantage of letting the N64 ACT like a 6-button controller (for things like Street Fighter).

    Nintendo's N64 controller was large and unwieldy but REALLY flexible.

    Games didn't use the flexibilty.

    Gamecube keeps the controls and options and tweaks the layout to be more useful.

    No it isn't 3-controllers in one (theoretically, N64 = Dpad + buttons, Dpad + analog, Analog + buttons), but 1 awesome controller with everything in a clsoe distance.

    Yes the Playstation dual-shock is a nice controller (once you get past the shock of not grabbing the left side and having the primary controller there... drove me crazy on the N64 and hit me again now), but the GCN isn't a ripoff of Sony.

    1. Re:Nah, GBA is separate by mh_tang · · Score: 1

      Analog shoulder pads, brilliant new invention (like N64's analog stick, SNES's shoulder pads, and NES's D-pad) that everyone will copy.

      Dreamcast had the analog shoulder pads before Gamecube. However, you're absolutely right about the GC having awesome controllers.

  80. Re:piss by Tasty+Beef+Jerky · · Score: 0
    Jump me to the gun, why don't ya? I do believe I'm the only one with the rights to call that on here.

    Oh well. I suppose all's well that ends well. I just wanted it to be said that I didn't call that until the very end.

    --

    I'm the tasty treat nobody can resist!
    IM Me! AOL IM:Tasty Beef Jerky

  81. Possible problems... by funkhauser · · Score: 1

    Tivo and saved games on the same hard drive? I can see it now:

    "You recorded over my Halo saved games with... TRL?!? AAARGH!"

    *sigh*

  82. Down with Xbox by spazmolytic666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Down with Microsoft,
    and
    Down With Xbox
    :-P

    --
    Help! I've fallen in a karma hole and I can't get up!
    1. Re:Down with Xbox by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      Awwwww, someone's mommy couldn't afford to buy him an XBOX for Christmas. My heart bleeds for you.

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  83. XBox is dead ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And MS is about to fail in EMEA and asia .... maybe US will still be a "niche" market.... but they are loosing shares since their early launch !

    1. Re:XBox is dead ! by Armand28 · · Score: 0

      Another kid whose Mommy couldn't afford to buy him an XBOX for Christmas. Thanks for conveying in words the taste of sour grapes!

      --

      Armand28

      "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  84. Too much in one box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't anyone think this might be reaching too far? Would this thing be able to record while someone wanted to play games? If Microsoft's already losing tons of money on the X-Box alone, it doesn't make sense that they would cram even more crap in there and then either lose more money on the combo, without even the guarantee that people will buy games to make up for the loss. Their only hope would be to destroy the competition, and then jack up the tv listings subscriptions prices.

  85. You guys are simply MORONS by Armand28 · · Score: 0

    If the device announced was running LINUX you'd all be lining up saying "WOW!!! THIS IS THE COOLEST THING EVER!!!!".

    /.'s credibility was shot about a year ago when Linux stopped being an alternate OS and became a religion. Now you people don't even think, which is sad.

    Secondly, this is NOT an XBOX EXPANSION, it's an ENTIRELY NEW PRODUCT. MS already owns WebTV and some other "consumer" type products, so why is a melding of these things so OUTRAGEOUS to you?

    Finally, my XBox has never had a blue screen of death. It runs great, VERY fast, very stable, so what are you complaining about?

    When you people stopped taking things on their own merits and started ONLY looking at who makes it you lost all credibility.

    --

    Armand28

    "-LINUX was a good OS, before it became a religion."
  86. Re: Beatrice by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, before MS attacked Netscape, who owned Netscape? Ooops.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  87. ohh, i get it, MS-M$ !!! by Data_Bus · · Score: 1

    Ohmigod, that is HILARIOUS. The fact that you changed MS to M$ has to be one of the funniest and original things anyone has ever done on Slashdot. Being the 10 millionth person to put something like this into a post is the height of comic genius and shows true independent thinking. I once heard this one about WinDOZE...

    1. Re:ohh, i get it, MS-M$ !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG YOU ARE HILARIOUS. I've never heard someone complain about someone calling MS, M$ before. And windows as windoze, that's GREAT! Truley your post is an inspired work of art.

  88. Sorry, I blocked the DC from memory by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    The DC controller was horrible. I blocked it from my memory...

    Let's START with the fact that the cord comes out of the controller in the wrong part... With a notch to run it back through?

    This thins is huge and hideous... I feel like hitting the shoulder pads makes me lose balance.

    How many fucking adapters does a controller need spaces for? How many adapaters does each adapater need?

    The N64 was bad enough when the rumble pack came out, the dreamcast controller sucks ass, competitive with the Xbox controller.

    Alex

  89. Re: Beatrice by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The scary part is that there are only 5 other huge media corporations in the world, each with a list that's just as impressive. The pdf above doesn't go into the same kind of detail, but still gives a good idea.

  90. Re:The diference between Homestation and MoxiBoxi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WebTV had its own OS; Perlman complained that after MS bought WebTV, they were only interested in cramming WinCE into WebTV, rather than improving the existing service and providing better customer satisfaction. Using Linux in Moxi is a commentary on MS's way of doing business.

  91. OT: Anybody ever get an Xbox to crash? by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. Has anyone ever managed to get a crash out of an Xbox? If so, what happened, and how did the box respond? Hopefully not with a BSOD.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    1. Re:OT: Anybody ever get an Xbox to crash? by nontrivial · · Score: 1

      I have seen reports where half the demonstration boxes in stores crash regularly, and you get a screen that looks a lot like the BSOD.

      --
      http://james.nontrivial.org
    2. Re:OT: Anybody ever get an Xbox to crash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My xbox has seen heavy use since launch day and I've only seen one crash. Playing DOA3 the box just froze up. No BSOD, just motionless boobs [-; I've never seen anything like the GSOD photos that were floating around the net, but from what I've heard they only show up on early version kiosk machines playing the first oddworld demo.

      A few other games (like amped) have annoying software bugs, but they don't actually cause a crash (however you might spend 30 seconds or so bouncing on your head).

      I also caution people about the PowerPad 3rd party controller. The rumble feature seems to cause a short in the controller that frequently exits you out of gameplay and back to the start menu.

  92. The more you squeeze, vader by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2
    .. the more consumers will slip through your fingers. And MS knows this, they aren't that dumb.

    If nothing else, MS trying to "strike a huge blow to the general purpose PC business, which will either drive it out of existence, or drive prices way up will sure increase sales of apple machines. And they know this.

    Over the long term, consumers will lose interest in hacking/development. It might take an entire generation, but it will happen.

    If MS's monolopy was absolute, you'd be right. But it isn't. They know this. They will not introduce features that virtually hand market share to thier competitors.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  93. HomeStation Domain Taken by nontrivial · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has already made the previous copyright owner of the name XBox rich, and now it looks like they are going to make some guy in China that owns homestation.com domain rich. Unless, of course, they pay off the WIPO folks to get it for them.

    But that is silly, because Microsoft would NEVER do anything mean, nasty, immoral, or illegal. Like fake videotape evidence in court or a ZDNet poll, or tell you that Internet Explorer is inseperable from the OS even when www.98lite.com tells you how to do it, or even use it's monopoly power to squash potential competition.

    James

    --
    http://james.nontrivial.org
    1. Re:HomeStation Domain Taken by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Oddly, 98lite.com requires the use of I.E 7.0.

      Ironic, don't you think?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  94. Homestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want only a gaming machine, you buy the Xbox. If you want to buy an entertainment machine you buy Homestation. Whats the big deal?

    The problem is with /. and a lot of people here are either uneducated (xbox emulator) or just outright blind.

    Sony wants to do the same thing, but I don't see you bitch about it. Sony has far more products than Microsoft. They have watches, alarm clocks, radios, cd players, movies, Televisions, ect. I don't see you bitching about it.

    If Homestation was a linux box, you all would be masterbating about it. How pathetic is that?

  95. Re: Beatrice by asincero · · Score: 1

    Just FYI, World Championship Wrestling was bought by the World Wrestling Federation from Time Warner/AOL.

    - Arcadio

  96. Re: Beatrice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Winamp isn't a company. You mean Nullsoft. ;)

  97. Bread Machine Attachment by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    I'd like a peripheral that plugs into the X-Box and serves up a piping hot loaf after a hard game of Halo. If Microsoft can make a paperclip talk, they can certainly make a game box that produces fresh baked goods.

  98. First time I've heard /that/, by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    No, it has a better controller

    Wow. That is (seriously) the first time I've heard that.

    It seems the universal bitch about the Xbox is the gigantic, unweildly controller.
    I have both a GC and an XB controller, and IMO, the GC controller beats the XB one easy.

    I have large hands so the XB controller wasn't /painful/, but I can't imagine a kid using that thing without feeling some pain.
    Yes, the GC controller is similar to a PS controller, but the PS controller design is a good one that works equally well with all sizes of hands.
    It seems like MS decided to randomly mix together design concepts from like 5 different controllers, and got, well, just that - a big, mutated frankenstein of a controller.

    C-X C-S

    1. Re:First time I've heard /that/, by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, that's exactly how I feel about the GameCube one :)

      Your mileage may vary, I guess :)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  99. xbox (peecees) vs. macs... by 69calicojack69 · · Score: 0

    the peecee users are the 'content consumers'. they will watch, be marketed to, and be controlled. (they have already proven they dont mind- see passport)

    the mac users among us are the 'content CREATORS'.

    where do you suppose the better jobs will be? with the creators, of course.

    where do you suppose the better 'eXPerience' will be? on the platform that has been creating content for years.

    iMovie is YEARS ahead of any peecee editing program, is free, and is the lead-in to more expensive (and mac-exclusive) programs like final cut pro. Can you do FCP things on peecees? sure- if you want to spend more than FCP ($999) for just a hardware encoding /firewire board, then add software, then struggle to integrate it, etc. the best solution on the market going forward into the 'digital video' era, is the mac, plain and simple.

    You guys all just keep puttering along with windows/linux/lindows/etc. in a few years you will be where i was last year, because of the integration/ease/power of the macintosh.

    good luck xbox suckers.

  100. Reverse ATM capability by peter303 · · Score: 2

    The Xbox has dollar bill slot like you find on ATMs.
    Except this one only takes dollars in.
    In this way MS can dispense with all the hoopla about
    supporting this or that capability and get to the point
    of what the Xbox is really about!

  101. Re: Beatrice by tordia · · Score: 1
    Is there an easy way to find this info? The last time I searched, I tried "company hierarchies", "company trees", and some others, but none of my searches turned up anything useful.

    In college, my roommate brought home a sheet of paper that listed the relationships and hierarchies of all the American entertainment giants. That was probably 3 years ago, it might be interesting to compare that to todays.

    --

    Frogs are primitive animals - so the occasional extra toe is not that unusual. But this is very unusual.

  102. You are a prick by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    I disagree with you on an assessment of computer hardware so I'm a moron?

    I'm not a huge Halo fan. It looks good, but I don't like FPS games. However, I really enjoy Luigi's Mansion. It's a fun game, not particularly deep, but fun and silly.

    However, I think that picking two arbitrary games (one system's flagship with 5 years of development, the other a technical demo that morphed into a short game) and comparing the systems is a little silly.

    The hardware is different.

    The GPUs are really hard to tell. I THINK that the Xbox GPU is stronger, but I don't know enough about the Gamecube's to know for sure.

    The CPUs are night and day. The Xbox has all the legacy garbage of the Intel Celeron, compared to the sleak Gamecube CPU. The Gamecube CPU is a more intelligent design, better at floating point, and overall should kick its butt.

    Xbox has more memory, point Xbox. Given the use of standard computer RAM, it should have 128MB, not 64MB. Stupid decision. As a result, this advantage become more minor than it should.

    GCN has faster RAM. There is RAM everywhere, with highspeed interconnects.

    This lends itself towards not having slowdowns. This should allow the GCN to sit closer to 100% utilization all the time.

    The game development environment is more condusive to building games with depth? What the fuck are you talking about. The Nintendo style of not having FMV lends itself to games that you PLAY more.

    The Xbox is a crappy PC thrown in a black box on the theory that games will be better because the hardware is fixed. However, if you lock all the hardware behind an abstraction layer, you don't really have much room to optimize.

    The advantage to the Xbox is that you can release games NOW that require its hardware, while PC games normally have to target PCs 2-3 years old. Given that everything save the GPU is 2-3 years old in the Xbox, this isn't a REAL advantage.

    Xbox has the hard drive and larger memory areas, this lends itself towards these deeper games that you discuss. However, having a GPU that shares the memory really knocks down that memory advantage.

    The Xbox is a sloppy system, justified entirely on hype based upon numbers that aren't that good when you analyze them.

    Two years and the Xbox is toast.

    Microsoft's strategy may be based upon the fact that they can crank out PC-based systems with near zero R&D. This means that they can rev the hardware every 3 years. Shrink the lifespan of the consoles, and you cramp Sony and Nintendo's abilities to do R&D. Take all the money out of the industry and Sony pulls out, and Nintendo gets hurt. Then you can leave crap out there and sell games.

    With Windows, MS needs to force you to WANT to upgrade. With an X-box monopoly, they just need you to WANT a new game, no need to put out new hardware or anything.

    What a sad, sad, sad possible future.

    1. Re:You are a prick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain to me how the Xbox is a sloppy system. Better yet, just admit that you hate the Xbox because you hate Microsoft. I hate Microsoft, but objectively I think the Xbox was done quite well.

      The Gamecube is great if you're 13yrs old. However, it falls far short for anyone with adult tastes (much like the Nintendo 64 and all previous Nintendos did).

      Oh, and as far as the GPU goes...show me ANYTHING whatsoever that comes even REMOTELY close on the Gamecube to the graphic beauty that is DoA3 on the Xbox. You can't. Because the Gamecube does not compete (unless you are age 13).

  103. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm... What do you call NeXT?

    Man, are you ignorant.

  104. Duh?!? by Mordanthanus · · Score: 1

    And everyone wondered why the XBox came with such a big hard drive that supposedly was only used for save game files...

    --
    User logging on... 300 baud... 300 BAUD?!? (Click!) NO CARRIER
  105. Re: Beatrice by kawika · · Score: 1

    When I finish reading these posts I feel like singing: "Life is a rock, but the radio rolled me..."

  106. Get ready for a bunch of crappy PVRs by RebornData · · Score: 2


    The technology behind a PVR isn't that complicated- a hard drive, a tuner, and MPEG encoder / decoder, video out, channel listings, etc... But getting one that really works well for the user requires quite a bit of subtle work -- if you've ever used a Tivo, you can appreciate the amount of thought and work that went into the software in the unit.

    Fact is, a lot of "convergence" vendors are going to be coming out with these boxes (like the MoxieMedia Center) that not only are a PVR but are going to try to do a bunch of things. I'm not bashing Moxie in particular (I've never used one) but I have a hard time believing that a company without MS's resources is going to be able to spend much time getting the user experience right for each of the functions.

    I hope Tivo and / or SonicBlue are smart and licensing their software technologies all over the place, because otherwise, we're going to be subjected to a bunch of exciting sounding boxes that really disappoint when you turn them on and try to use them.

  107. GameCube's controller won't work well for Tetris by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    However, [a portable system] isn't competition for home systems.

    If you only have one TV and multiple children, it is. The kids will fight over who gets to play on the TV and who has to sit out and play on the GBA.

    I won't grant that the Gamecube controller is a rip-off of the Playstation's controller. To me it is a natural evolution.

    Granted.

    with the added bonus of the D-pad and Analog both being usable with an easy switch.

    This is going to make Tetris Worlds hellish. It'll be quite difficult to make the pieces do what you want because the digital pad is so far away from the palm of the hand that the thumb must be twisted from the normal 45-degree orientation to reach the pad. You may get similar problems to what happens when trying to play Tetris with a SideWinder USB joypad (SWPNP or SW GamePad Pro), such that it's next to impossible to push straight down without also pushing to the side.

    The button layout on the right is the SNES layout reoriented around the reality of a primary button (A), secondary button (B) and optional extra buttons (X, Y).

    Two problems: 1. It's confusing for Super NES veterans, who associate the primary button with the letter B and the upward direction with the letter X and see the Cube's buttons as rotated 90 degrees clockwise, and 2. it's nearly impossible to press B and Y with one thumb on the Cube's controller.

    The SNES had four equal buttons

    According to nintendo developer guidelines (which have been partially leaked over the years), the Super NES had two main buttons (A B) and two secondary buttons (Y X).

    However, the hardware interface treated B and Y as primary and A and X as secondary. The interface was based on the NES Four Score interface, which concatenated the data of players 1 and 3 (each in A B Sel St Up Dn Lt Rt order) onto player 1's port and players 2 and 4 onto player 2's port. Super NES, on the other hand, uses B Y Sel St Up Dn Lt Rt A X L R 0 0 0 0 order, where the 0's apparently have something to do with mouse quadrature (the mouse buttons are sent on A and X; try plugging a mouse into port 2 and using the pad test in kirby's avalanche).

    but they were rarely uses as such.

    Several Super NES games used the buttons as a second directional pad, such as Smash TV, where B fired south, A+X fired northeast, etc. Many PlayStation games (such as Forsaken) also came configured this way. This was made explicit in the design of the Virtual Boy and Nintendo 64 controllers.

    The C-buttons had the advantage of letting the N64 ACT like a 6-button controller

    And the Wishtech Adaptoid (an N64 to USB/HID adapter) even returns button information to Windows as if it were a 6-button.

    (for things like Street Fighter).

    Or in real-time tactical sims such as Starcraft 64.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  108. N64's Z button same as Super NES's L button by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Also, as far as the analog shoulder buttons go, yes, the DC had those first, but but the GameCube's are so much more comfortable (besides, the N64 was the first to use a trigger

    Nope, Super NES was the first. In the right-side playing position (left hand on center arm, right hand on right arm, which most games used), the N64's Z trigger corresponds to the Super NES's L trigger.

    but I'm not sure if it was analog).

    It was digital.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:N64's Z button same as Super NES's L button by Nerds · · Score: 1

      Nope, Super NES was the first. In the right-side playing position (left hand on center arm, right hand on right arm, which most games used), the N64's Z trigger corresponds to the Super NES's L trigger.

      Not sure what your point is here. The Super NES didn't have a "right-side playing position", the N64 did, like I said. I wasn't claiming that the N64 was the first to have shoulder buttons, I was saying that it was the first to have a button that worked like a trigger (like the Dreamcast, GameCube, and XBox).

      --
      My other .sig is 'The Art of Computer Programming'
    2. Re:N64's Z button same as Super NES's L button by yerricde · · Score: 1

      I wasn't claiming that the N64 was the first to have shoulder buttons, I was saying that it was the first to have a button that worked like a trigger (like the Dreamcast, GameCube, and XBox).

      What's the difference between a "shoulder button" and a "button that works like a trigger"? I was stating that N64'z Z button is a shoulder button.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:N64's Z button same as Super NES's L button by Nerds · · Score: 1

      Read my original post:
      Also, as far as the analog shoulder buttons go, yes, the DC had those first, but the GameCube's are so much more comfortable (besides, the N64 was the first to use a trigger, but I'm not sure if it was analog).

      That's all, I'm not making a big deal out of it. Yes, the Dreamcast had analog triggers, but Nintendo went for the trigger idea first. My point is that most, if not all, of the improvements in controller design over the years have come from Nintendo.

      --
      My other .sig is 'The Art of Computer Programming'
  109. "Business PC" to become expensive? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    What is more likely is that Microsoft is trying to divide the pie into two segments and PC types: business and home.

    The worry here is that "business" systems (that is, real PCs) will be available only to corporations and cost $5,000 for the base model, something that very few free software developers can afford.

    Also, a closed system can be made more stable

    Which will prompt Sun, HPaq, etc. to sell "integrated" (i.e. closed) business "solutions" instead of relatively open workstations and servers. Do you know of any large market (money-wise) for open systems?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:"Business PC" to become expensive? by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      Could be, but I think the market will keep business PC's similar to what they are today. (Also, when I say business PC's I don't mean they won't be found in the home. Maybe I should make the distinction of work vs. fun PC). What will change is that you won't be able be able download movies and music onto the work PC's because the content producers will do their best to make it so. That will be the sole dominion of the "HomeBox" or whatever they call it.

  110. Re:The diference between Homestation and MoxiBoxi. by exodus2 · · Score: 1

    Not really, he created webTv then it was bought by Microsoft. I remmeber reading somewhere that it originally ran on linux and mircosoft was hellbent on changing it over to theirown os.

    --
    .sigs suck, thus nothing here.
  111. Who looks at the Subject Anyway? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    Who needs Dell, Compaq and IBM? Microsoft is about to cut them out of the deal completely. Why not just sell your own computer?

    The question is, how far will MS take their 'hardware lust'? how close to being Apple will they get before the afore mentioned giants turn on them?

    Rule #1 in business: Dont compete with your own customers.

    1. Re:Who looks at the Subject Anyway? by shandrew · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is in the business of competing with its customers and putting them out of business. For example, look at every company that has tried to make a mass-market spreadsheet, wordprocessor, web browser, or email client for Windows. It can do this easily since it has a monopoly and the companies cannot do anything about Microsoft's actions except go into prolonged legal battles.

      A fixed hardware platform does offer advantages of integration, potentially leading to better ease of use and quicker integration of new standards. Apple uses this to its advantage quite well, but it would be manipulated badly by a microsoft monopoly.

  112. mpeg-2 encoding in real time by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

    Grabbing the mpeg-2 stream from a satellite box is a great idea. Something like 5C encryption on the stream piped over USB would keep the MPAA happier.

    The TiVo uses a hardware real-time encoder because the main CPU is wimpy. A Pentium 4 @ 2.2GHz is probably getting close to doing MPEG-2 @ 720x480x60 in real time with some quality. Creative's requirements (Video Blaster Movie Maker) for 352x240 MPEG-1 or 2 (at probably reduced quality as well as resolution) is a 350MHz PIII.

    Instead of compromising on quality, though, you could add an external MPEG encoder, connected via USB like the ADS Tech. Instant DVD (under $200). That's expensive now (compared with $300 for the Xbox), but give it time.

    {Yes, full-speed USB is capable of carrying video. 12 megabits/sec > 5-6 mbps of DVD. USB won't carry lightly compressed video like DV (3.6 megaBYTES/sec). For that you do need firewire or high-speed USB.}

    The Xbox's hard drives are little small for PVR, though. An external USB connected drive with encryption would be a good idea.

    If we're putting the hard drive & possibly video encoder in an external box, the need for the xbox is diminished, though. If we're doing analog PVR from any source, the xbox can provide UI & control. If we're doing PVR from satellite, though, might as well run the UI on the satellite box & make the add-on just a USB hard drive with CPRM.

  113. oh geezz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I am almost crying from laughter. Why are you all so worried about the XBox? I love Linux, have used it for the past 5 years on every server/workstation I can. I own systems from Sony, Nintendo and now Microsoft. To date, I have to say despite my inital hesitations I love the XBox. No I haven't had any 'blue screens' and I don't expect I will. I preffer games on my councle because I don't want to fork over another 400 to NVidia every 4 months and then buy games that only use the system to about 60-70% of what they could because the developer had to code for however many hardware types there are, councle hardware is both cheaper and has a much longer life in use, period. Use your computer for work and /.ing

    The PS2 and GameCube are both great too, I like the XBox because I didn't want to go spend another 300 on a DVD Player and I wanted the DD5.1. PS2 doesn't really have either worth a damn. Although they have the better games (as would be expected from a system out for 12+ months ahead of time). GameCube won't ever get the more mature games I am looking to play (only so many times I can play a Mario game)...but its a nice system none the less.

    The only truely scary thing is you people who are freaking out about MS 'running your house' and crap. Get over it, build your own house, don't buy one with such features, something.

  114. .. and just wait for the Xbox MK3 by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I'll bet it includes a M$ dumbed down Office version, and some more internet tools (M$ Messenger, M$ irc client, M$ Outlook-a-like etc.) because there's a huge marked out there that doesn't *need* a general purpose computer. You've seen it already with games. Now the choice is OpenGL and PC marked or DirectX and PC *and* Xbox marked. It's the new idea of embrace and extend. If you want to embrace our Xbox marked, you need to follow our extensions (and our rules).

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  115. Re: Beatrice by abischof · · Score: 2

    In due fairness, Comedy Central is jointly owned by Viacom (yeah, that other mega-entertainment company) and HBO (which is an "AOL/TW Property", of course).

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  116. End of the monopoly? by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

    how far will MS take their 'hardware lust'? how close to being Apple will they get before the afore mentioned giants turn on them?

    Whoa!

    Good fscking point!

    However, an Xbox2++ might eat away at the home market for PCs which doesn't seem that profitable anyway. Microsoft doesn't seem interested in going after the higher margin powerdesktop/workstation/server market. Might Dell & Co. just let 'em have a bit of home & concentrate on business?

  117. Re:The more you squeeze, vader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Tarkin, damnit!, not Vader.

  118. Re: Beatrice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody for Viacom? Let's see, Infinity (radio + billboards), CBS, Paramount, MTV, VH1, Nick...

    I'm sure Bertelsmann is similar?

  119. Re: Beatrice by abischof · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there an easy way to find this info? The last time I searched, I tried "company hierarchies", "company trees", and some others, but none of my searches turned up anything useful.

    Though I'd be very interested in finding such a list, I find that -- in lieu of such a list -- it can be helpful to just check on the websites of the MegaCorps themselves (as they seem to be more than eager to list their subsidiary companies).

    For instance, I've been boycotting Pillsbury ever since they sent cease-and-desist letters to universities and Sun Microsystems (among others) for using the term "bake off" to describe their protocol evaluation sessions.

    But, it doesn't just end there. With a little checking, you can find out that General Mills owns Pillsbury. And, for a boycott to be effective, that meant that I needed to also boycott the rest of General Mills. So, for instance, that means no Yoplait, no Cheerios or Chex, no Betty Crocker or Bisquick, and no Jolly Green Giant, Old El Paso, or Progressive (among other brands). And, you know what? I've stuck with it -- to this day, I don't buy from Pillsbury, General Mills, or any of its subsidiaries.

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  120. Re: Beatrice by abischof · · Score: 2

    s/Progressive/Progresso (doh)

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  121. Re: Beatrice by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Time Warner sold World Championship Wrestling off to WWF Entertainment, Inc. almost a year ago.

    Please check your facts before posting lies to Slashdot. I always do!

  122. Microsoft Philosophy by Bipoha · · Score: 1
    I'm really sick of the kitchen sink being thrown into everything Microsoft makes, and everything "communicating" with everything else within the entity. Those extras will ultimately become dependencies and good luck finding something that does only what you want, without those things you don't.

    Future HomeStation error: "Error: A newer version of Microsoft Word is required for you to listen to this CD."

  123. usb controllers by PMan88 · · Score: 1

    it's a pretty simple thing to do. there could be four usb ports on the front. controllers, hubs, keyboards (useful for typing in name), etc. can be plugged in. and controllers can be used on computers and maybe even other consoles.

  124. Re: Beatrice by sulli · · Score: 1

    Qwest is a company all its own. You make a good point, but come on, ESPN and Qwest are obvious. How many more mistakes are there?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  125. All in one... by Penguin2212 · · Score: 0

    It seems taht everything is going to merge into one super-device. Which can play games, get on the internet, watch DVD's, watch TV--the list goes on. It's kind of like FM radio cards in PC's. Most people don't have them, and those who have them don't usually use them. I can't speak for everybody, but the one I was foolish enough to buy I've hardly used. It just shows that rolling everything into one device, doesn't always make things better. There's a healthy medium between complete integration and total sepereation.

  126. This "Linux head"... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    This Linuxhead you slammed is an MCSE. I kicked Linux out of my server room a while ago. We run OpenBSD for almost all our Unix needs (I run Linux database servers far from the Internet because of OpenBSD performance problems).

    Look at the Xbox hardware. It is a Celeron processor with OTS components that are found in PCs. The Gamecube uses a custom processor that was based on IBM's desktop CPU, but with a custom GPU and unusual memory configurations.

    The system, componentwise, is a PC, with a custom OS (using kernel code from Win2K, but a completely custom Ring-0 OS). The kicker to me is the inclusion of DirectX. DirectX means that applications for WinXbox are source compatible with Win32.

    All the yelling in the world that this is a custom system built for gaming doesn't make it so. It is a PC with a good gaming sound card AND a special chip that converts PC resolutions -> HDTV resolutions (taking up to 1024x768 resolutions).

    It burns cash for MS because the component costs are expensive. However, their R&D costs are really low. It's a tradeoff.

    However, if you rev the system regularly, there is less time to recoup R&D costs. The Sony, Sega (Saturn and later), and MS strategy is to burn money early on and make money late in the console's life. A R&D light approach let's MS put everyone out of business.

  127. The engineer in me hates it by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    The engineer in me HATES x86. I understand why it was a good solution in the late 70s and early-mid 80s. It became an ugly hack in the early 90s, and is now a legacy solution.

    Including support for "legacy" assembly code in Microsoft's first generation video game console is stupid.

    The Gamecube has horrible software for the crucial 16-24 segment, but find outside of that. At 22, I'm unusual in LIKING Nintendo's offerings. We'll see what happens, because my peers were kids for the NES days, in college during the N64 days, and now out starting to earn a living. We'll see what happens, but I think that Gamecube has a shot.

    I REALLY like Luigi's mansion. Pikmin is awesome. I don't like DOA3 or Halo.

    I have Rogue Leader II, it's fun to show off my Gamecube in surround sound and 480p. However, I don't really care for the game.

    I'm a 22 year old college graduate, and I like the game cube.

    Alex

  128. Re: Beatrice by kFuNK · · Score: 1

    AOL-TW doesn't own World Championship Wrestling... their steroid-driven competition, the WWF does.

    But I get the point ;-)

  129. Question about XBOX DVD... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    I read that the xbox dvd player spins backwards so that the games can't be read on a pc (presumably to stop copying and emuation). Yet it can play normal movie dvds can't it ?. So does it spin both directions ?. How does it know which way to spin ?.

  130. Leaders. by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    Can MS function without its fearless leader?

    Can the Linux movement?

    I'm sorry, the GNU/Linux movement. For now. Statistically, RMS will probably die first. Then we can circumcise the name.

    --saint

  131. I think that m$ have missed the point of computers by heideggier · · Score: 1
    In the future, when M$ isnt around (and all monopolies end eventually) there greatest mistake will be pursuming that there success is down to the stuff they make. Or rather, that anything with the name M$ will sell just because it is m$, that they are seperate from market reality. Like the bandits that demand tribute for accessing the villages only well they now believe that people are better off with them.

    The reality is that though years and years of extending there monopoly and crashing any real threat they have to the desktop, M$ have missed the whole point of what computers are about. Computer are about Personal empowerment, The first PC's were created, not to really fill any great need, but rather because some geek got sick and tired of having to rent time on the University mainframe. M$ success has been because of the personal empowerment that computers provide, namly a cheap platform to write your essay's on, or spreadsheets, or whatever.

    With the Xbox come homestation, and .net &c &c. M$ seem intent on turning computers into a platform just to run M$ content, A passive platform not unlike TV and redunent in comparison to it.

    Going back to the bandits example, they have left the well, to set up government in the village. However, The well still exists and people still need the water, no doubt newer bader bandit will move in, but perhaps people might learn to carry the water for themselves for once.

    --
    Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  132. linuxbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone got Linux running on the XBox hardware yet? Since M$ sells tham at a loss, all we gotta do is get Linux running, then buy as many as we can and eventully bankrupt M$. They'll effectively be subsidizing the spread of Linux via cheap assed hardware.

    I wonder how Wolfenstein would look under Linux on Xbox hardware?

  133. Re: Beatrice by walt_r · · Score: 1

    AOL TimeWarner do not (yet) own EMI and since EMI owns Capitol and Virgin records. Of course EMI is looking for a buyer, but the EU quashed attempts of both Warner Music and BMG to merge with EMI.

  134. Sleeper? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    There's no reason the X-box can't be fitted to be a "poor man's Tivo" or better yet a "poor teenager/student's Tivo." MS could use the intel processor to do a small mpeg-2 compression and then zoom it out to fill the screen. It may sound crappy, but if the dongle/adapter/whatever is priced at a fraction of what a VCR costs then you've just saved a whole lot of money. It could even look a lot better than your typical EP/LP VCR recordings. You can market it as the DVD player that records too.

    The fact that MS didn't market this box as an all-in-one game/tv/tivo/web/email solution probably means this is just speculation or that they didn't want to press to pick up on the magic word "Bundle." Bundle would turn off a lot of people who are ambivalent towards MS but don't want to pay extra for stuff they don't need or turn off people who already have an OS monopolist gripe with them.

    Its a PC disguised as a game machine, it can be a lot of other things if there's a market and most importantly if MS can compete in that market.

  135. Help! It is an overpriced PC! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    Heya, all complaints about MS being a "monopoly' would be eliminated if instead of selling PCs they just sold these babies. After all no-one can bitch at you if it is your OS and your browser running on your 'gaming console'. Hehe. Yah right. ^_^

    Remember that 'hardware interface standad' thingy that /. reported on last week or so that was MS's idea? Imagine that implemented into this next system;

    I am sure that it will come out on the PC too.

    Heck add some Mac support and. . . . ah, you see where I am going with this? MS would dominate THREE platforms minimum and it would THEN have the power to leverage OTHER platform manufacturers into making their systems complient with Microsofts systems(sounds like a good thing? Finaly some game support in *nix? Hold on. . . ) ;

    Which would likely also include some sort of software that has to be licenced from Microsoft on some sort of per computer (or user, heh) basis.

    Imagine M$ collecting royalites from _ALL_ computer users!

    Oh yah, and imagine the PR campaign that would make you all /GLAD/ to pay them.

    Don't believe me? Just look how far the anti-ms stance has changed even within /. itself. Hell a good part of the rest of the net is decidedly pro-ms, bleh.

    The beast shall have you yet!

  136. what about linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from what I've heard the xbox is bunch o pc hardware bundled togheter as a console (or a low end pc), sold at a price lower than the actuall price of the components because they except the money to come from games, considering that there is a linux version even for segas dreamcast hasn't anyone started working already on getting linux to run on the xbox ;) ?

    xbox to linuXbox oh the irony....

  137. Re: Beatrice by cgenman · · Score: 2

    If you really want to know how much "choice" you have in the marketplace, look for foods / supplies in the supermarket that involve patents. You can usually trace which brands are identical products by the same company if you follow which patents are on the products you buy. Detergent, for example, is a marketplace rife with colors and boxes, but trace the patents and everything is being made by Dow and one other company.

    It's a lot of legwork, I know, but it is something that you can do in your own life.

  138. Re: Beatrice by SilentChris · · Score: 2

    Thank god. Cartoon Network and Comedy Central are practically the only channels I watch on TV. I didn't want AOL owning both of them.

  139. Re:Question by posmon · · Score: 1

    no problem, i can't stand to see a troll in difficulty. that bit in simon the sorceror damn near broke my heart.

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  140. Re:Question by posmon · · Score: 1

    maybe this could be the start of a beautiful friendship.

    --

    update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

  141. Open Cola. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux; A maker of a brand of Linux made Open Cola..

    Oh, and Microsoft DID make something for the TV. The Microsoft version of the TiVo thing. That, and the TiVo works on an NT kernel..

    1. Re:Open Cola. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a computer-enhanced VCR. Still haven't left the realm of computers.