Slashdot Mirror


Xbox To Use Region-Locked Peripherals

Cutriss writes "This newspost over at National Console Supply Exchange seems to leave all the potential Xbox controller-importers in the dust. Apparently the US Xbox will only allow peripherals with a specific USB ID to connect to the console, thus locking out the use of Japanese controllers, which will have different USB IDs." Update this doesn't mean all peripherals will be region encoded. Apparently Joypads will work on both sides of the pond.

336 comments

  1. MS by ruiner13 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sounds like a good way for them to make money, and push out competitors.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

    1. Re:MS by vf123 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have a jap controller and a ps2 converter controller and both work. If you read down on the article it says that they should work as well. Only the headline says they don't.

  2. Nice by sofar · · Score: 1, Funny

    Next thing will be that we won't be able to install our own DVD player into our PC's, maybe use only Microsoft mice, and of course no special keyboards anymore.

    1. Re:Nice by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

      M$FT branded and licensed products, of course. So 3rd-parties are out? Maybe it wont violate the DMCA to hack the Xbox to make it cooperate w/ other hardware, since M$FT is being ghey as usual turning avg consumers into criminals. BAH!

      Solution: dont buy an xbox.

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    2. Re:Nice by jmccay · · Score: 2

      Chances are Microsoft is trying to eliminate the market of generic controlers inside the US. That way you will only get what Micrsoft officially allows because to be able to otherwise would require proprietary knowledge (the USB ID).
      I doubt even Microsoft could force somethign like this on the PC because they don't control the entire distribution of PCs.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    3. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... you should use microsoft keyboards and be happy with that!

    4. Re:Nice by tetsuo13 · · Score: 1

      ...................yet!

      No doubt that within the next 5 years they will try and enter the hardware side of things (PCs, consoles, TVs, microwaves, whatever and where ever)

    5. Re:Nice by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, what are the chances I can hook my controller into a USB port and read the USB ID that it declares.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that is outlawed be the DMCA!

    7. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is just gay, fuck microsoft
      its the last straw - format c:
      now where did i put that redhat cd?

    8. Re:Nice by Dikarika · · Score: 1

      Dead Milkmen!

      Ya Know what Stewart? I LIKE you... you're not like the other people, here in the trailer park...

      Your sig just made my day... :)

      --

      Peace, Love, Games
  3. How Ghey by SkewlD00d · · Score: 0, Troll

    M$FT Gheyness Detected.

    rm -rf /;kill -9 -1;poweroff

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    1. Re:How Ghey by toupsie · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      rm -rf /;kill -9 -1;poweroff

      This didn't work in Windows XP! What am I doing wrong?

      8P

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    2. Re:How Ghey by SkewlD00d · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1) reformat
      2) install slackware.

      =)

      --
      The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    3. Re:How Ghey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are calling kill and poweroff after you have deleted them.

    4. Re:How Ghey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the answer to what you are doing wrong, you are using Windows XP. (what isn't actually wrong, if you are a Windows user, but it really shortens life, if you are a Linux user)

  4. So? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Playstation made it so you couldn't play japanese playstation games.

    I don't see the big deal, here. If Japan wants to sell controlers, they'll make them with the appropriate "US" USB settings.

    Or people will make an adapter, like the modchip.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:So? by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BTW - notice all the MS bashing already.
      Would you think differently if it was Sony? Nintendo?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:So? by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      Really. Someone's going to make a USB passthru that mangles the USB ID on the way out.

    3. Re:So? by ddstreet · · Score: 5, Informative
      If Japan wants to sell controlers, they'll make them with the appropriate "US" USB settings.

      USB vendor/product ID has nothing at all to do with "US" USB settings, in fact the only country-specific part of the USB spec is the String (descriptors) which have a lang id.

      If the X-Box is discriminating based on USB IDs, it is locking out certain Vendors or certain Vendor's products. Most likely they are locking out certain vendors, as the product ID is really up to the Vendor; the Vendor ID is assigned by the USB-IF.

    4. Re:So? by Filter · · Score: 1

      Or people will make an adapter, like the modchip.

      Ever hear of the DMCA?

      --

      "better ways of doing things eventually just replace the inferior things" - Linus Torvalds 09-08-07

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Ever hear of the DMCA?

      Yeah, and what exactly does that have to do with this?

      Oh, wait -- anything that might have to do with using technology to get around something a company doesn't want you to do now falls under the DMCA!

      Uh, just how does a law meant to protect digital content copyright holders have any relevance to this situation?

    6. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. That would be bypassing a goddamned lockout mecahnism, or something. What a load of crap.

    7. Re:So? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      This doesn't appear to have anything to do with Copyright, however. If someone imports a piece of HARDWARE, what do you think they're going to do, copy it illegally?

      I can think of a number of reasons why they might want to restrict hardware vendors, misguided as it may be, but this isn't a DMCA issue.

      This is more along the lines of the vendor IDs used for PS/2 (the IBM computer, not the Sony device) MicroChannel hardware. of course, look at what happened to MicroChannel...

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    8. Re:So? by pmz · · Score: 1

      Creating a repeater device that just regurgitates a "replacement" ID enroute between a peripheral and the XBox sounds like a fairly trivial task.

      So trivial, in fact, that making one using a simple circuit diagram and a trip to Radio Shack would be a nice weekend project.

      Is this the case? If so, are the reistors and NAND gate ICs at Radio Shack also in violation of the DMCA? They are just components that, when connected in the right way, can sidestep a company's schemes. How is this different from those Dreamcast serial cables or GBA flash cards?

    9. Re:So? by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      Yes and they will be illegal to produce in the US (DMCA violation) and thus will be made abroad. But oops, now U.S. customs will seize any of these as they are shipped into the country! (Just like Dreamcast serial cables and GBA flash carts.)

      See the problem now? This is definately going too far and I think someone needs to address this type of thing quickly before it gets any more out of hand.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    10. Re:So? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Playstation made it so you couldn't play japanese playstation games.

      This is a different animal. It appears that they are now making it so that you have to buy your controller hardware either from M$, or from a M$ approved vendor. This would be equivalent to Playstation not allowing you to play games made by anybody else.

      Of course, maybe I'm wrong and encoding the correct USB setting will not be a secret, thus allowing even generic controller brands to offer a US-compatible version.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    11. Re:So? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ever hear of the DMCA?

      If making an adapter is a DMCA violation, then any of you people out there using computers that spoof the MAC address on the ethernet card in order to connect to your high-speed internet service that only allows a specific MAC address are going to be in violation too....

      But I don't think this situation is using technology to get around copy protection....

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    12. Re:So? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "Playstation made it so you couldn't play japanese playstation games."

      And as far as I know this has yet to be tested in court. This is right on up there with region coding on DVDs and may violate trade treaties the same way.

      Of course, at least in the US it's still legal to mod your hardware to accept foreign software.

      "I don't see the big deal, here. If Japan wants to sell controlers, they'll make them with the appropriate "US" USB"

      Without even getting into whether they could or not, should they have to?

    13. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GBA flash cards are considered illegal, and so are dreamcast serial cables (although I do not agree with that)

    14. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone bashes MS because of the issues in Windows, now they create a stable platform by controlling the hardware and people still are not happy. What is the difference between this and Apple? If I were to produce a product I would want to be able to control who builds products that that plug into it. Why? Because when those poorly designed peripherals fail who shoulders the blame? With XBOX everyone would point the undeserving finger at MS.

      $1/50

    15. Re:So? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      But I don't think this situation is using technology to get around copy protection....
      Since when has that ever stopped the DMCA? DeCSS is not for getting around copy protection either. It's for getting around other types of restrictions, like the region encoding, and the restriction that only officially approved DVD players are allowed to play DVDs.

      The DMCA is the back door the "big guys" are using to gain total content control all the way up the supply chain - from content production to consumer use of said content. Normally it would be a violation of anti-monopoly laws for a single company to grab total control of both the production and the distribution channels of a type of product. But with the DMCA they get to do it in a back-door way, by only releasing the details of their copy protection scheme to those manufacturers that agree to enforce their market control schemes. For example if you don't put region encoding or fast-forward suppression into your DVD player, and agree to keep the code secret, you don't get the legal right to the copy protection decrypter. In the past such efforts would have been laughed at by the open-source crowd, who have some pretty good reverse-engineers among them. But now with the DMCA, it doesn't matter that you are smart enough to decrypt the content without the help of the content provider - it's illegal to do so or tell anyone else how they can do it.

      So they get control of the consumer's products for content viewing without actually having to own the companies that make the consumer's products, and thereby not triggering anti-monoply laws.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    16. Re:So? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      DeCSS is not for getting around copy protection either.

      I agree with everything you said, except that although DeCSS was not intended to get around copy protection, the "evil empires" used the argument that it CAN be used to defeat the DVD encoding, and therefore violated the DMCA. I definitely wouldn't bet my money on M$ not finding a way to use DMCA against anyone that gets around their controller control (pun intended). It's not what the DMCA was intended for, but big companies will try to stretch it for this kind of purpose.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    17. Re:So? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "Everyone bashes MS because of the issues in Windows, now they create a stable platform by controlling the hardware and people still are not happy."

      First off, I don't feel that the Xbox has been on the market long enough to call it "stable." Remember that even their UltimateTV required patching.

      Secondly, I was under the impression that the anti-trust case against Microsoft was partly over how they DID have an inordinate amount of control over PC hardware, or at least its manufacturers.

      "What is the difference between this and Apple?"

      For one I don't think Apple has regional lock-outs, nor am I aware of special requirements needed to make USB (or even FireWire) hardware beyond fees for the use of their patents.

      Also I don't recall Apple ever having a monopoly, let alone having a history of abusing that monopoly to their own advantage. The US courts have found that Microsoft has systematically and repeatedly abused their monopoly over at least the past decade, so why shouldn't we be wary of anything Microsoft does that hurts consumers, no matter how slight they seem? Especially given the history of these anti-consumer practices snowballing in Microsoft's case...

      "Why? Because when those poorly designed peripherals fail who shoulders the blame?"

      The manufacturer of the peripheral. If your Canon printer breaks you don't call Dell (unless you bought it from Dell and Dell promised to support it).

      And when it comes to consoles, I don't recall Nintendo ever getting blamed for sucky peripherals, even ones with Nintendo's "Seal of Quality" on them. Consider the Power Glove.

    18. Re:So? by ddstreet · · Score: 1
      Yes and they will be illegal to produce in the US (DMCA violation)

      I certainly don't like the DMCA at all, but changing the Vendor/product ID has nothing to do with allowing access to copyrighted material, so I don't think the DMCA would apply.

    19. Re:So? by Steveftoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The PS doesn't allow you to play any game that is not Sony approved. All PS/PS2 games have a special boot system that only Sony can put on a disc. FYI, all PSX/PS2 games are made by Sony, at least the physical copy. As a game developer, you submit a final 'gold' version of your program and then Sony makes X copies of it for you and gives them back to you so you can sell it. AFAIK, you pay them up front for all the copies and if they don't sell then you lose the money. I know this is how the Big N does it as well.

    20. Re:So? by ddstreet · · Score: 1
      So trivial, in fact, that making one using a simple circuit diagram and a trip to Radio Shack would be a nice weekend project.

      Either your weekends are much longer than mine, or you are not familiar with how USB works.

      Doing this would not be difficult, but it would be more than a weekend with Radio Shack parts. To do it, your device would have to actually parse the data from the USB Host Controller, and pass-thru everything except the request for the device descriptor. When the device descriptor is requested, it would have to get the real device descriptor (from the real device) and replace ONLY the vendor ID and product ID fields.

      If you can do that with only resistors and NAND ICs, I bow to your ability. ;)

      In any case, I don't think such a device would be allowing any access to copyrighted material, so the DMCA wouldn't apply. It would be different from a Dreamcast serial cable in the sense that some people (e.g. Customs, Sega) claim the cable is used to pirate games. There is no possible way a ID-altering device could ever be used to pirate anything...well, no way that I can think of...

    21. Re:So? by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      the game is copywrited

      the controller allows you to access the game

      if you modify the controller (via an adaptor) then, technically, you are violating DMCA

      [simpsons]Technically, going to the bathroom is a sin[/simpsons]

    22. Re:So? by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      The UID is proprietary information (similar to a password) and reverse engeneering it is against the law according to the DMCA. That my friend is the problem with the DMCA and why it needs to be struck down, because of rediculous provisions like this.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    23. Re:So? by jrockway · · Score: 2

      Well, legality or lack-thereof never stoped anyone. Ever hear of drugs? Lots of people use those, and they're pretty illegal.

      My point, of course, is that it's only illegal if you get caught. How about someone in Sealand (heh) posts a website on how to build a pass-thru connector. Is it illegal to read that now?

      And again, some people don't care if it's illegal!

      --
      My other car is first.
    24. Re:So? by Milkyman · · Score: 1

      Its not about japan selling controllers, as a gamer, there are many games and accesories for game consoles that come out in japan that never come out here. A sega music game named Samba De Amigo is played with two maracas (spelling?) shaped controllers that you shake to play the game. This as far as I know did not come out here. A better example was the game Virtual On 2. The virtual on arcade cabinets have dual joysticks for controlling the action, in japan the home version of hte game came with the dual joystick controller, in america it did not, and the controller was not domestically released. The game is truly no fun with the standard controller.

    25. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yeah right, and you can kill a dozen people, but you're only a criminal when you get caught as well, huh ?!
      Your point is the most idiot thing I have read in quite some time...

    26. Re:So? by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Illegal? What do you mean, my company requires them! I've been taking many in preparation for this "drug test" they say is coming up soon.

      :)

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  5. Maybe not.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless perhaps changing USB ids is a simple matter.

  6. yup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i'm sure they'll start selling the japanese controllers here for $50 in a couple months

  7. Update from the web site by David+Frankenstein · · Score: 5, Informative

    * Addendum at 02:28PM EST *
    A lot of e-mails have poured in from other sources and developers these past few hours. A call from an Microsoft employee also came in. The Japanese X-Box joypad should work with USA consoles. We'll confirm this tonight once our suppliers test the joypad with some USA games we shipped them earlier this week. If all is well, then our shipments of Japanese X-Box joypads won't go to waste after all.

    1. Re:Update from the web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically the site jumped to conclusions before any actual testing was done. Does this guy work for CBS?

    2. Re:Update from the web site by psiflare · · Score: 1

      I've used a Japanese controller in a US XBox. Admittedly it came from a development house, but it's supposedly the same as the final release.

  8. Good! by Anomaly+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Put another nail in the coffin!
    Can't say I'm upset about this...

  9. And how long will it take for a smart adaptor... by Static_Neurotoxin · · Score: 1

    to hit the market?

    --
    --- If stupidity got us into this mess, why can it get us out?
  10. Perhaps they will work after all by prototype · · Score: 1, Redundant

    An update at 14:28 EST on the site says:

    A lot of e-mails have poured in from other sources and developers these past few hours. A call from an Microsoft employee also came in. The Japanese X-Box joypad should work with USA consoles. We'll confirm this tonight once our suppliers test the joypad with some USA games we shipped them earlier this week. If all is well, then our shipments of Japanese X-Box joypads won't go to waste after all.

    liB

  11. Also of note: by Ieshan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft will be installing QuarterSlots(TM) into their controllers, to make sure that the players have actually bought the controllers and USB keys legally.

    "It isn't fair!" claimed Joey, who says that "Mom wont even give me fifty cents for a game on the X-Box", even after he bought it with his "christmas money".

    Microsoft will be handing out the controllers free, but will be requiring that they be brought back into the stores to empty out the quarters that have been filled inside. A microsoft spokesperson commented: "Hell, 50 bucks of change a day gets heavy, you know. You wouldn't want to hold that in your hand, would you? See, we're just making it easier on the consumer!"

    1. Re:Also of note: by llamalicious · · Score: 1

      In related news, Sony Inc. announced the release of TokenSlot(tm) technology apparently in response to Microsoft's release of the QuarterSlot(tm) controller add-on.

      Makers of the modchip for Sony Playstations have declared that they will be creating slugs (coin sized metal weights of no real value) to defeat both lockout mechanisms.

    2. Re:Also of note: by n6mod · · Score: 3, Funny

      This just in:

      The DoJ and Customs department have announced that Slugs(TM) are in fact a violation of the DMCA...

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    3. Re:Also of note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah... It'll use some form of ecash

    4. Re:Also of note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further updates:
      * The EFF has announced a campaign to to allow free importation of slugs, claiming that they have "significate legitimate uses".
      * Protestors on the Internet have taken up the cry "if slugs are made illegal, only criminals will have slugs!"

    5. Re:Also of note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in (SNN) --Two teenagers are charged with loading up two shotguns with slugs and fired away at their Xbox. Detectives at the scene have determined the shotguns used were not DMCA region encoded approved and have filed charges in the case. Judge Gates has denied requests for bail and ordered the defendents to take the 5th Amendment. Lawyers were quiet and made no comment.

  12. I see a convertor in the cards by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all it is is a certain USB ID, wouldn't you just need some kind of USB male-female cord and a small convertor that changes the ID as it goes through?
    $10 says that the import shops are already working on this.
    The only good use I would see for this feature is locking out unauthorized perhipherals, especially some that might damage the machine.
    But the more paranoid of us probably think it's another monopoly move from the Beast. Which it may well be.

    1. Re:I see a convertor in the cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The only good use I would see for this feature is locking out
      >unauthorized perhipherals, especially some that might damage the
      >machine.
      >But the more paranoid of us probably think it's another monopoly move
      >from the Beast. Which it may well be.
      >
      >
      The only reason for this is to make sure that the suckers who bought an Xbox in the US can only use Microsoft-licenced joystick/pad/mice. Why do you think the Xbox doesn't use the standard PC joystick which is of a far better design than the crap Xbox uses?

    2. Re:I see a convertor in the cards by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      And what will you do when you order your converter only to have it seized by US customs, leaving you out of money?

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    3. Re:I see a convertor in the cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if the convert cost less than the price difference of the import & U.S. of A part.

      More fuel for DOJ antitrust case ? What excuse they have this time ?

    4. Re:I see a convertor in the cards by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      If it's got the USB logo on it, then surely it should be able to cope with being connected to any other USB device? Just like only CDs conforming to ISO9660 are allowed to have the CD Digital Audio logo on them. Thinking about it that way makes it seem more like a monopoly move.

    5. Re:I see a convertor in the cards by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used the Xbox controller? Granted, for first person shooters a mouse and keyboard is the best, but the control on Halo is *really* good compared to using any other PC gamepad with a PC first person shooter.

  13. If ever by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 0, Troll

    there was a good reason to not buy an xbox..

    Not a bad reason tto dislike M$ either.

    --

    Not everyone deserves a 320i

  14. Circumvention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously this will not take much of an engineering feat to circumvent. A simple adapter of some sort, emulating the circuitry in a US controller, between the foreign controller and port is all that will be needed.

  15. Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by M-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but is there a SANE reason for not allowing the use of these imported controllers?

    Other than "A Machine We Control Totally", that is.

    Is there some kind of incredible controller for the Xbox that is only available in Japan (as the original response controllers for the PSX were)? So that Microsoft doesn't want people to have them because of some other kind of interesting occurance? And how long until someone either finds a way to change the USB ID in the controller firmware, or an enterprising company decides to make their own US-based USB ID controllers that match a local controller that isn't USian? Fairly soon, I would guess.

    1. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by mrseigen · · Score: 1

      Is there some kind of incredible controller for the Xbox that is only available in Japan Yeah, the Japanese pad, which doesn't eclipse the Sun if you hold it at the wrong angle.

    2. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 5, Informative

      > but is there a SANE reason for not allowing the use of these imported controllers?

      Only for suitable definitions of sane. The idea of all region locks is that you can charge what each individual market will bear for a product, without worrying that import from a lower-priced region will force you to drop your prices in a more rich region. Classic example, India is poor so DVDs are sold with a much lower markup there, but DVD/CCA/MPAA can't have people importing cheap Indian DVDs and reselling them in the US where the markup is much, much higher. So, they make them incompatible.

      In case this sounds ridiculous, it might help to know that it's also illegal in many parts of the world. Australia and the EU are both invsestigating DVD region codes. Google for 'price discrimination', 'market segmentation', or 'price fixing' for all the info you care to absorb.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    3. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by Geckoman · · Score: 1
      Is there some kind of incredible controller for the Xbox that is only available in Japan?

      In fact, there is...maybe. The standard Japanese controller is considerably smaller (and therefore more comfortable-looking) than the US controller, and it features a different (arguably better) button layout.

      Compare the Japanese controller to the American controller for yourself.

      Personally, I don't think the standard American controller is all that bad, and I'm not convinced the Japanese controller is much of an improvement anyway. The grass is always greener....

    4. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by M-2 · · Score: 2

      I'm aware of the various region-coding issues (being both the owner of an Apex AD-600 DVD player and the Japanese release of 'Mononoke Hime' on DVD - a most excellent set, three DVDs, much subbing and dubbing and extra goodness). I also was aware of Australia, but didn't know about the EU.

      I wonder if companies could successfully file issues with the World Trade Organization to indicate that regionlocks could be considered a 'restraint of trade' issue. There's an idea for someone with deep pockets.....

    5. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I wonder if companies could successfully file issues with the World Trade Organization to indicate that regionlocks could be considered a 'restraint of trade' issue.

      Australia, are you listening?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by javilon · · Score: 2

      " an enterprising company decides to make their own US-based USB ID controllers that match a local controller that isn't USian "

      That will destroy what the USB ID is meant to achieve: A way to discriminate between devices. And if this happens a lot, people writing device drivers will have to care about incompatabilities between different physical devices with the same ID.

      This has the potential to hit linux, if some of this devices are used on regular PCs.

      Thanx Micro$oft.

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    7. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      Yes.

      "The ACCC is contending that a multi-national company, Sony Computer Entertainment, is moving in this particular case to prevent Australian consumers from reaping the benefits of globalisation" -- Professor Allan Fels, ACCC Chairman
    8. Re:Perhaps I labor under a misapprehension... by racerx509 · · Score: 1

      But it is! What you don't understand, is that Microsoft is in a national plot to give americans carpal tunnel syndrome by making them use the over-sized, uncomfortable X-box controllers. The player's hands will be so cramped up, that they will have to get surgery to repair their damaged hands. Of course, Microsoft will have worked out a deal with the RSI surgeons and RSI lawyers, so they will make all the money. Bill Gates will rule the WORLD MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

      --
      13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  16. Why oh Why? by PoiBoy · · Score: 1
    That Microsoft incurs a loss on the sale of its XBox hardware is common knowledge. Therefore, why in the world would they do this? Having additional manufacturers of controllers would create additional interest in the XBox, and this would ultimately lead to higher profits to Microsoft through the sale of more software. I cannot see any valid reason for Microsoft blocking these.

    I'm usually a pretty conservative guy, but hearing some of the things that these companies are doing to take away the rights of consumers is really starting to piss me off.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:Why oh Why? by Hormonal · · Score: 2
      Most (prolly all) game manufacturers take a loss on every console they sell, since that's where all of the Good Stuff(TM) is.

      The controller is just a hunk of plastic, with a few microswitches(?) in it. I'd bet that Microsoft is making a profit on every controller they sell, even with the huge amount of raw materials they have to dump into a controller of that size.

      Regardless of whether or not Microsoft is making a profit on controller sales, this is an underhanded thing to do. I'm hoping this is some sort of mistake, and that the update to the site is correct. I would like nothing better than to see the XBox fail miserably, but I'd hate to see consumers (even the ones silly enough to buy an XBox) hurt in the process.

    2. Re:Why oh Why? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I'm usually a pretty conservative guy, but hearing some of the things that these companies are doing to take away the rights of consumers is really starting to piss me off.

      good.
      Now use your energy to write letters, paper letter, to your reps,to the pres, to the president of corporation, etc.
      Maybe even get other like minded people together.

      if you are all ready doing any of this, good for you, keep up the good work.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Why oh Why? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      The controller is just a hunk of plastic, with a few microswitches(?)

      I think Immersion might argue differently

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:Why oh Why? by SerpicoWasTaken · · Score: 1

      Actually, don't send paper letters. Real mail is barely getting through in Washington with that whole Anthrax thing. Most reps and sens web sites encourage emailing because of the problems with the mail.

    5. Re:Why oh Why? by Hormonal · · Score: 1
      Interesting that Immersion went for Microsoft, when Sony and Nintendo have had force-feedback preipherals since quite a while before the XBox came out. Hell, Interact had that crazy vest, which was nothing more than a chest-worn subwoofer.

      Prior art discussions (actually, controller-innards discussions in general) are tangential to my original point, anyway. My point was that the controllers are cheap to manufacture, and that Microsoft is probably makinf a profit from them.

      Thanks for the link, though. I missed that article somehow, and I'll have to go back and read it.

  17. Interesting strategy by synx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But I'm not very keen into it. I wonder if this kind of thing will slip over into the PC world? I somehow doubt it since most hardware companies are interested in selling to the max number of customers (think motherboard mfrs like Asus).

    Locked hardware is almost criminal. Unfortunately we're all boned.

    1. Re:Interesting strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Max number of customers? Think twice. Nowadays
      support by software companies is more important than making a good piece of hardware.

  18. Simple Answer... by Myriad · · Score: 3, Redundant
    Just don't buy products (in this case an X-Box) that have this sort of "feature".

    I know you may want one, but the only way to get companies to stop doing this kind of thing is to vote with your wallet. Otherwise, where is their insentive?

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Simple Answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet: buy and reverse-engineer the product
      to remove the "feature".

    2. Re:Simple Answer... by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      the incentive is even simpler ...

      it's illegal. You have to pay big bucks if you do this.

    3. Re:Simple Answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the heck are you replying to? He was saying "don't buy an xbox". So far, I don't think it's illegal to NOT own an xbox.

    4. Re:Simple Answer... by kennylives · · Score: 2

      Not yet, anyway...

      --

      Where the value of X-Mailer: is the true measure of a man...

    5. Re:Simple Answer... by tshak · · Score: 2

      Just don't buy products (in this case an X-Box) that have this sort of "feature".


      Better not buy the Playstation 2 either.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    6. Re:Simple Answer... by Troed · · Score: 1
      Of course not - we _are_ waiting for the GameCube right? (And if we're in the two regions where the GC is already release, w have one - right?)


      Nintendo is Good For You(tm)


      I'm not even sarcastic today :)

  19. So by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

    just what is the point for region encoding gam epads?

    --
    >
    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wild guess: Money? More of it in MS pockets, to be precise? Could that be it?

  20. Please... by gazuga · · Score: 1

    How long do you think it will be before someone breaks the coding of the required "USB ID" and releases an adapter? If history has shown me anything, its that this won't be a problem for very long...

    --gaz

    --
    "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    1. Re:Please... by Green+Light · · Score: 1

      But that would be a "circumvention device", and we all know what that means...

      --
      "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    2. Re:Please... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      It's not circumventing any encryption. Your filtered power supply or UPS is a circumvention device for circumventing faults in your house's/office's power supply. Not all circumvention devices are bad, even in the evil eyes of the DMCA. Anyway, there's no copyright being infringed. At the worst, such a device might allow people to infringe MS's patent on the design of the controller by making cheaper ones that look like it and don't require the same USB ID - but people don't want to do that - they just want to use Japanese X-Box pads which is perfectly legal.

  21. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would concern me. If I had an X-Box, that is. As long as people like Slashdot readers, who should know better, buy the stuff, the shit which is forced down their throat by MS is a non-issue. Wake up or shut up.

  22. XBOX != PC by Amarok.Org · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The XBOX is a game *console*. It's perfectly reasonable to maintain a closed standard. What MS is trying to do is make sure they get their licensing fees from "official" peripheral manufacturers, instead of having their profits dried up by cheap Taiwanese knockoffs.

    When another company does things to try and protect their market share, it's reasonable. When Microsoft does it, it's inherently evil. Remember, Microsoft does *NOT* have a monopoly on the console market, and has to claw it's way into contention.

    I'm not a Microsoft fan by any means (MacOS, MacOS X, and Linux all run my household servers/desktops), but I do own an XBox.

    --
    -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    1. Re:XBOX != PC by tomhudson · · Score: 0
      Wrong. The XBox is a PC.

      PC video, PC o/s (cut-down version of Win$hit), PC Pentium 766Mhz cpu, PC hard disk drive, connectors, etc.

      It's being marketed as a game console, because as a gaming PC it would really suck.

      Note: You don't have to patch the controller USB ID, just the code on your hd.

    2. Re:XBOX != PC by Graff · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Remember, Microsoft does *NOT* have a monopoly on the console market, and has to claw it's way into contention.
      In order to make this statement to be more in line with Microsoft's past strategies in areas where it didn't have market dominance, a few changes will be added:
      Remember, Microsoft does *NOT* YET have a monopoly on the console market, and has to BUY, CHEAT, FUD, AND EMBRACE-AND-EXTEND it's way into contention.
      Heh, sorry - it had to be said. We now return you to your regular programming...
    3. Re:XBOX != PC by Hormonal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's a good point. Microsoft is also extremely brand-conscious (security is another story...), and they may be doing this in order to keep from diluting their brand.

      I don't like Microsoft either, and I'd rather be dipped in boiling almond oil than pay money for their space-heater-that-plugs-into-your-tv, but they may have reasons for doing this, other than iron-fisted control over the console and cashflow.

      (I know this post is a little at odds with my previous post, but I hadn't read this comment when I posted originally. I think this decision may have been driven by all of the factors people are speculating on, and I still hope that the update to the site in question proves to be accurate.)

    4. Re:XBOX != PC by Amarok.Org · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what's inside. The Dreamcast isn't a PC, but you can run Linux on it. The hardware may resemble, and in fact may in cases be used like, a PC... but it's not sold as a PC, it's usage is not like a PC, and it's therefore NOT A PC. It's a game console. You can hack it to do whatever you want, but it's still a game console.

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    5. Re:XBOX != PC by Wateshay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have absolutely no problem with them doing this. The problem I have is if they want legal protection to allow them to protect this revenue stream. It should be perfectly legal to create a USB pass-through that modifies the region coding on a device in order to allow non-region devices to work. This is the same issue as with DVD. I don't care if DVD manufacturers want to put region coding on the DVD, but if I figure out a way to defeat that region coding, that should be perfectly legal.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    6. Re:XBOX != PC by Angst+Badger · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The XBOX is a game *console*. It's perfectly reasonable to maintain a closed standard.

      Oh hooey! This is exactly the same as if a fork manufacturer tried to restrict the brands of pork chops you were allowed to stick it into. Selling a product entitles you to be paid for the product; it does not magically grant you additional rights to dictate to third parties how to conduct their business. That's called an "anticompetitive practice", and the current administration notwithstanding, it's illegal.

      Of course, the laws are written for and interpreted by people who are paid by the people who want the laws in the first place, so it's rather academic, but still...

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    7. Re:XBOX != PC by theridersofrohan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The XBOX is a game *console*. It's perfectly reasonable to maintain a closed standard. What MS is trying to do is make sure they get their licensing fees from "official" peripheral manufacturers, instead of having their profits dried up by cheap Taiwanese knockoffs.

      Yes the XBOX is a marketed as console (although, as you and I know, it's suspiciously close to a PC). It is, however, the only console to disallow importing peripherals. A joypad bought in Japan is not any less official than one bought in the UK, the USA etc. And what makes you think for that matter that "cheap Taiwanese knockoffs" will not create "cheap joystick knowoffs" with US USB ids?

      This is a good example of Microsoft trying to totally control their livingroom PC...

    8. Re:XBOX != PC by British · · Score: 2

      Didn't Nintendo try to do this with preventing of "unauthorized" game makers making NES games? Didn't help much. There are tons upon tons of NES games that are horrible with the NES Seal of Approval, usually seen at the bottom-right of the box.

    9. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft does not have a monopoly in console market *yet*, but there are making a BIG effort the accomplish this. Just wait three or four years.

      They should not do things to "protect their market share"... they should be improving their product.

      And when other companies do this sort of thing it is not a good (r) thing... it is equally wrong (and stupid - because eventually monopolies fall apart - history shows that).

    10. Re:XBOX != PC by BlueMonk · · Score: 2, Troll

      Hm... and if you don't need a license to operate a fork, why should you be required to have a license to operate a car? And what's with all this rental stuff -- let me pay rent once and KEEP the dang apartment; after all I only have to pay once for a fork! ;)

      (Cowering in fear of the "Flamebait" mederators...)

    11. Re:XBOX != PC by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      This has nothing to do with cheap Taiwanese knockoffs. This has to do with Microsoft making a different, smaller controller exclusively for the Japanese market (one that would obstensibly be more comfortable for some of us) ... and now giving us no way to import this OFFICIAL controller. THAT is why people are upset.

      I do hope that this turns out to be bunk, some made up fanboy rumor based off spec sheets that they didn't understand.

      Like most rumors.

    12. Re:XBOX != PC by Tofuhead · · Score: 2

      The uproar doesn't come because MS was apparently trying to lock out "cheap Taiwainese knockoffs" (not to mention high-quality Japanese third-parties like Ascii), the uproar was over the possibility that American software was required by Microsoft to ignore the USB IDs of Japanese controllers, made by Microsoft or not.

      If this is actually the case (I find it doubtful that even MS could be so stupid as to discriminate against such a harmless practice as importing a controller), it is the first time that _any_ console manufacturer has ever intentionally region-locked a controller. Nintendo, Sega, and Sony have never done this (good thing...playing fighting games on my Dreamcast and Playstation would be infinitely less fun without the loose d-pad and firm buttons on my Capcom and SNK Ascii FT pads).

      < tofuhead >

      --
      It is still the dark of night.
    13. Re:XBOX != PC by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Remember, Microsoft does *NOT* have a monopoly on the console market, and has to claw it's way into contention.

      However, they are using a version of its monopoly OS inside this console. I would argue that the XBox therefore should be placed under the same anti-trust restrictions as anything else having to do with their monopoly. They are levereging their monopoly to extend into a new market. If this controller story is true, they are using the controllers to protect their attempt to extend their monopoly.

      Putting Windows in the XBox gives them a huge licensing cost advantage, lowers the bar for porting PC games, and raises the bar for competitors in the console market.

      If they want the XBox to be free of anti-trust restrictions, that would be fine, and they could do whatever they want to annoy their customers. However, to do this they would have to develop a new OS for the console that has nothing to do with Windows, or buy an OS from another vendor.

    14. Re:XBOX != PC by Osty · · Score: 1


      Wrong. The XBox is a PC.

      PC video, PC o/s (cut-down version of Win$hit), PC Pentium 766Mhz cpu, PC hard disk drive, connectors, etc.


      Wrong. The XBox is a console that just happens to use PC components. The XBox is not the first console to do this. The Dreamcast used a PC graphics chipset (from PowerVR -- essentially, the precursor to the current Kyro/KyroII chipsets). The Gamecube uses a PowerPC CPU and PC video (from ArtX, purchased by ATI, technology from which will soon start appearing in ATI's Radeon line, if not already). The XBox isn't even the first console to use an nVidia graphics chipset (that honor would go to the Sega Saturn, which helped bail nVidia out of a dangerous financial situation). Hell, even the old Genesis was a Motorola 68K at its core. PC components do not a PC make. It makes sense to use a video chipset from the PC world in a console, because the most powerful consumer-grade chips are currently made for the PC (well, okay, the XBox's chipset, then NV2a, is more powerful than anything on the PC market yet, including the latest GeForce 4, but that will change in time). As far as operating systems go on consoles, it's a necessary component these days. The XBox uses a modified version of Windows 2000 because, surprise surprise, the XBox is made by Microsoft. (off-topic: using terms like "Win$hit" does not lend any credence to your arguments). And consoles will have hard drives. The PS2 has one in the works, and expect the Gamecube to get one eventually as well. And the next generation of consoles will all have the hard drive built in.


      It's being marketed as a game console, because as a gaming PC it would really suck.

      No, it's being marketed as a game console because it was designed as a game console. And as a game console, it's very powerful. The fact that the hardware is identical across all XBox units allows developers much more freedom than they have in the PC world to fully leverage the power of the XBox. This first round of XBox games are very impressive (well, most of them, anyway -- as with all platforms, there are a few stinkers). All of those were built using DirectX and various Microsoft-provided APIs. Just wait until the developers start writing their own low-level libraries, like console game developers have always done. The games will be exponentially better. (don't believe me? Have a look at the first generation games for Playstation 1, and compare it to the "last" generation, which would include things like Final Fantasy IX.) You're going to see a lot more done on an XBox than you'd ever be able to see on a comparably spec'ed PC, simply because the XBox is not a PC

    15. Re:XBOX != PC by Trekologer · · Score: 2

      Its NOT a closed standard. Its a very much open standard PC built from off-the-shelf parts using the open PC hardware standards. It just happns to be that Microsoft is now treating it as a closed system. It seems like Microsoft is trying to bend the standards to what suits them, that is collecting a royaly on anything that could work with their product. We've seen them do this before many times (Kerbos, Java, HTML, XML, ad infium).

    16. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can do what ever they want with their fucking product fuck horn. If the XBox didn't exist, the korean crooks would have no way to make money off it anyway. Boo hoo. Don't want to pay $60 for a contropller? Don't buy the fucking console. Simple. Yet 99% of /. can't figure out that simple equation.

    17. Re:XBOX != PC by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When another company does things to try and protect their market share, it's reasonable. When Microsoft does it, it's inherently evil. Remember, Microsoft does *NOT* have a monopoly on the console market, and has to claw it's way into contention.

      Oh, that's right. I remember all those posts along the lines of "God bless Nintendo for using proprietary DVD technology to lock out unlicensed 3rd party developers!" I myself have written ballads in praise of Cisco for breaking compatability with other company's routers. And don't forget the kick-ass /. party we had to celebrate the brilliance of Intel making a proprietary slot connector for their CPUs to lock out clones! At least I assume it was kick-ass... I can't remember a thing about it!

      Or maybe it's because it didn't happen.

      Nice try, but if you want hypocrisy, you'll have to search for it somewhere else. Go check any other article where someone has tried to lock in their market share by locking -out- competitors, and you'll find the only people who thought it was okay -then- are the ones who are saying it's okay for MS to do -now-... Like you.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    18. Re:XBOX != PC by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Nope! You know who the first person Joe Consumer will go to when his cheap-ass $5 XBOX controller doesn't work is? Microsoft. Regardless of how much everyone likes to hate MS here, the fact is, that's resources they'd be spending to tell Mr. J.C. that he bought a knockoff and that no it won't work properly. Geez a little kneejerk with the anticompetition statement eh? A fork doesn't have the ability to change function - it's always a fork. A cheaply made knockoff peripheral (See also: Item made specifically for use with another) could work improperly, and MS ends up having to deal with it.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    19. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the xbox as far as i know runs a bastardized version of WindowsCE, an OS which MS hardly holds a monopoly in.

      in the palmtop market windowsCE is small time compared to the likes of PalmOS

    20. Re:XBOX != PC by GMontag451 · · Score: 1
      Hm... and if you don't need a license to operate a fork, why should you be required to have a license to operate a car?

      You don't need a license to operate a vehicle, you only need one if you want to operate that vehicle on public roads. Anyone can drive a vehicle on private property without a license as long as you have permission of the property owner.

    21. Re:XBOX != PC by bear_phillips · · Score: 1

      Why should the XBox be any different because it is a *console* ? And why do some many people accept this type of stuff when it comes to computers?

      If Ford made a car that had a special chip that prevented you from using brand X tires, the press would be all over it.

      For some reason consumers just accept this kind of stuff when it comes to electronics.

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    22. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the Real World, bub. Unless you have several million to bribe the congresscritters with, it will STAY illegal.

      As I patiently explain most days, being illegal does not make it wrong and being legal does not make it right...

    23. Re:XBOX != PC by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

      Hm... and if you don't need a license to operate a fork, why should you be required to have a license to operate a car?

      What? I need a licence to operate an XBox? When did that happen?

      And what's with all this rental stuff -- let me pay rent once and KEEP the dang apartment; after all I only have to pay once for a fork! ;)

      You want to rent a fork? I can rent one to you for a monthy fee of 10% of the retail cost, plus first and last month's rent, and a security deposit. If you stop paying, I'll take it back and take any money you owe and damages out of your deposits.

      Neither of these arguments has any relevence to the XBox. Yes, some of the words are the same (licence, pay, etc.), but the context is completely different.

      You rent an apartment, you buy an Xbox. If I want to trash the apartment, the landlord has the right to keep my security deposit. I don't own it. If I trash my XBox... No one has any recourse for my actions. It [is/should be] mine to do with as I please.

      (Cowering in fear of the "Flamebait" mederators...)

      Personally I think you should cower in fear of the "Overrated" moderators.

    24. Re:XBOX != PC by bnenning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bingo. This perfectly illustrates the fundamental unfairness of the DMCA and similar abusive laws. Vendors are allowed to use technology to impose restraints above and beyond what copyright provides for, while users are forbidden from using technology to remove those restraints. In a real free market, any attempt at market segmentation via region coding would swiftly fail; yet the US and other governments have deemed it necessary to use their guns to prop up otherwise unworkable business models.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    25. Re:XBOX != PC by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      You know who the first person Joe Consumer will go to when his cheap-ass $5 XBOX controller doesn't work is? Microsoft.

      Do you really think that Microsoft hasn't factored support costs into the price of the console and games?

      Microsoft has been proven to follow anti-competitive practices. Until they show a propensity to allow competition, there is no reason not to have "a little kneejerk with the anticompetition statement."

    26. Re:XBOX != PC by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "The XBOX is a game *console*."

      For now.

      Microsoft has figured out a way figure out allowable USB devices and those that aren't allowed. If Microsoft brought this feature over to their Windows softwre, things could get interesting. The first thing that comes to mind is that Microsoft now has a big stick to enforce driver signing requirements. If you don't play along (ie. make drivers for non-Windows OSes), Windows will forever identify your hardware as a possible security risk (and possibly take action because of it).

    27. Re:XBOX != PC by chfleming · · Score: 1

      Do not you both see that you are both false.

      1) You can not create an ideal categorical theory of ontology that applies to things that are not well defined.

      2) You are using different definitions, therefore none of your arguments apply to each other.

      You are both barking at the wind.

    28. Re:XBOX != PC by Lectrik · · Score: 1

      A fork doesn't have the ability to change function - it's always a fork.

      sorry i have to disagree. Based on my personal experience a fork can also be a "electrical wall outlet current redirector" and a "super happy flingy dart toy", and an "ow i just sneezed while i was tryint to eat my green beans and stabbed my gums with this thing" among other things

      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    29. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did somebody say Apple?

    30. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford/ GM/ DCX do void your warranty if you put on unapproved aftermarket products. And that is a standard business practice. They cannot shoulder responsibility for things that they did not design.

    31. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If I trash my XBox... No one has any recourse for my actions. It [is/should be] mine to do with as I please.

      Actually, I'm guessing you, like most, will try to use the waranty period to your advantage as much as possible. So if you plug in a peripheral, and it hoses your machine, you'll be expecting a replacement console. So Microsoft does have a period of responsibility, implied and explicit, for which they have every right to attempt to protect themselves.

      Now start the movement to ax all warranty laws, and your argument will hold water.

    32. Re:XBOX != PC by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't like Apple myself. And I really didn't think anyone else liked their practice of not allowing 3rd party OEMs. If so, well, consider yourself (+1, insightful).

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    33. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god you are stupid

    34. Re:XBOX != PC by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      The XBOX is a game *console*

      So if i made up a nice-looking box containing a pentium x processor, some RD RAM, a standard hard disk with my own variation of ReiserFS or something, and a customised mainboard with built-in high-spec video and a standard USB host controller, removed the PS/2 mouse and keyboard connectors, and installed a weird version of Windows (take your pick), i could sell it as a console? It's a cross between a console and a PC I would say. Show me another device like that and I'll accept that MS doesn't have 100^% of the market share.

    35. Re:XBOX != PC by jaavaaguru · · Score: 2

      (Kerbos, Java, HTML, XML, ad infium).

      I thought the idea was that anyone could make their own extensions to it? Hence the "eXtensible" Markup Language. The other things were most definitely abused, as is their monopolistic position in the PC/Console crossbread market.

    36. Re:XBOX != PC by plugger · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem to affect car manufacturers. Your warranty will be invalid if you use non-genuine spare parts, but you can use any suitable tyre if you need to. Also, the car manufacturers do not actively prevent importers selling their products to people with older vehicles.

    37. Re:XBOX != PC by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm guessing you, like most, will try to use the waranty period to your advantage as much as possible. So if you plug in a peripheral, and it hoses your machine, you'll be expecting a replacement console. So Microsoft does have a period of responsibility, implied and explicit, for which they have every right to attempt to protect themselves.

      And that warranty probably explicitly denies culpability for harm done by third party products. BFD. Besides, if they (Microsoft) are not expecting a certain amount of warranty repairs, and subsequently adding that into the price of the unit + games, I'll eat a live chicken.

    38. Re:XBOX != PC by dstone · · Score: 2

      A fork doesn't have the ability to change function - it's always a fork.

      "Fork" is what it IS, not its function. Likewise, "console" and "joystick" are what they ARE, not their functions.

      Some common fork functions...
      - piece or scoop food with, on way to mouth
      - back scratcher
      - faux-finish painting tool
      - screwdriver (on edge)
      - modern art component
      - roach clip

      And I'm sure each passing day, people invent new functions for what is known as a "fork".

    39. Re:XBOX != PC by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      It is, however, the only console to disallow importing peripherals
      Didn't the US Dreamcast lock out the Japanese light gun somehow?
    40. Re:XBOX != PC by tshak · · Score: 2

      A) There are already "cheap joypad nockoffs" that are perfectly legal that you can buy at Best Buy for $20-30.

      B) Playstation 2 has region encoding on it's games.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    41. Re:XBOX != PC by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      For some reason consumers just accept this kind of stuff when it comes to electronics.
      Two reasons;
      • The people that can't do anything about this don't understand what the hell is going on, and
      • The people that do understand what's going on find ways around it or avoid it altogether.
      As one of the latter, I can now choose between not buying an Xbox or keeping an eye on Lik-Sang (et al) for some sort of adapter or mod-chip. Currently I choose not to buy an Xbox.

      (Notes: I'm in Australia so Lik-Sang can still get stuff through to here, however their service sucks -- I bought a hybrid rumble pak / memory pak for my N64 and it doesn't work. Returning it will cost me more than I paid for it, Lik-Sang will not pay for shipping on faulty items. Moreover, the Xbox isn't out here yet and quite frankly I don't have the space for it in my room.)

    42. Re:XBOX != PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When another company does things to try and protect their market share, it's reasonable. When Microsoft does it, it's inherently evil.

      I think it's the other way around. When another company does things like this we always protest. When your favourite Microsoft does it, you're mad.

      I'm not a Microsoft fan by any means (MacOS, MacOS X, and Linux all run my household servers/desktops), but I do own an XBox.

      Yeah, right. And I'm not a Microsoft fan by any means, but I do own a Windows box. Same thing. Hypocrites like you just sicken me.

    43. Re:XBOX != PC by SA3Steve · · Score: 1

      How come I can't use my JVC remote control with my Sony TV? This is definitely illegal!

    44. Re:XBOX != PC by Amarok.Org · · Score: 1
      Yeah, right. And I'm not a Microsoft fan by any means, but I do own a Windows box. Same thing. Hypocrites like you just sicken me.

      And anonymous cowards like you sicken me. If you feel the need to attack me, at least log in.

      That said, I'll take obvious bait and respond.

      Not being a Microsoft fan does not make me their supporter nor enemy. I choose the best solution for the job. For my desktop, that's OSX. For my wife's desktop, that's OS9. For my servers, that's Linux. And... for a game console, that's the XBox IMHO.

      Go away, little man.

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    45. Re:XBOX != PC by mattACK · · Score: 1

      Profitable game companies (or games departments of larger organizations) means more kick ass games for me. Let Sony/MS/Nintendo make a buck on this; the entertainment value in my life is priceless.

      There is not a game company alive that works for the good of humanity.

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
    46. Re:XBOX != PC by BlueMonk · · Score: 1

      OK, the ";)" was supposed to clarify the sense of irony if it wasn't already obvious enough, but apparently that didn't work. Apparently I have to draw the picture: my *point* was that a fork is about as good a comparison to an XBox as it is to an apartment or a car. An XBox has to be considered for what it is, not compared to something completely irrelavent. Different circumstances call for different rules. There's no reason an XBox should abide by the same rules as a fork.

      Of course I'm familiar with the concept of analogies, but I'm just saying, I think the fork analogy is a bad one.

      OT: As for the the moderators, the only reason I mention the "flamebait" moderators is because those are the moderations (not just against my own posts) that seem to be suspect. I've seen my own and others' (IMO) insightful posts moderated as flamebait recently. Just because a post invites an opposing view shouldn't make it flamebait (especially when its relavent).

  23. And it goes without saying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    .. that if you try and make an import controller work with an American XBOX you can no doubt be sued under the DMCA for circumvention of the lockout.

    gg Microsoft

    1. Re:And it goes without saying.. by pclminion · · Score: 2
      I may be wrong, but I don't think the Digital Millenium Copyright Act covers hardware interfaces. By building a competitive controller, you are not in any way endangering Microsoft's total control of its copyrighted property -- i.e., the game. You can't put a copyright on a hardware interface since it is not an intellectual "work." It might be intellectual property, but it isn't covered by copyright law (correct me if I'm wrong).

      In fact, by building a competitive controller you are going up against another company in an effort to produce the best product -- this is the basis of capitalism. Microsoft is again executing monopolist strategy, but this time it's a little confusing -- what does Microsoft really have to lose by allowing others to manufacture game controllers? Is the game controller sector really a huge source of MS income? Highly doubt it...

    2. Re:And it goes without saying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a stupid joke. Aren't you tired of saying the same things over and over again?

    3. Re:And it goes without saying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be wrong, but I don't think the Digital Millenium Copyright Act covers hardware interfaces.

      You didn't read the recent articles about nintendo and the GBA linker, did you?

    4. Re:And it goes without saying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      removing locking on peripherals have nothing to do with copyright - it doesn't let you use illegally copied slopware.

    5. Re:And it goes without saying.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the same token (DMCA) a step up/down converter to use a 120 volt device in 220 volt region would be a violation of the DMCA.
      Hehehe....

  24. Pot, kettle, black... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    well, I might get flamebaited for this, but here we go....

    If Linux did the same sort of thing to MS, people would laud Linux for taking a stand against MS.

    Well, MS is taking a stand against foreign competition in their controller market. Big deal, other than the oh so conspicuous fact that it's MS doing it.

    No matter what your take on MS, remember, they are a business, and it MAKES BUSINESS sense for them to do this.

    One good thing from all this, I believe this will drive the prices down for individual controllers for the X-box, which is a good thing.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by glh · · Score: 2

      Just curious, but why do you think it will drive the prices DOWN? I think it would drive it up. After all, if a company wants to legally make an MS compatible controller, they will have to pay the necessary licensing fees in order to have their USB controller work. Since that is the case, you may have only a few companies selling controllers- less market means more demand, which means mo money! :(

      I'm guessing the prices for controllers will be higher rather than lower.

    2. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Just curious, but why do you think it will drive the prices DOWN?"

      Well, my reasoning goes something like this:

      MS would be stupid to charge an outrageous price for a spare controller in a market which they "own". The reason I say this is because if they do, then more and more people will look to alternatives, which will in turn decrease sales of MS's controller. So, by lowering prices, they effectively make it not worth hacking.

      That's my reasoning, but it's been a long day, so please take it for what it's worth ;-)

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    3. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by slithytove · · Score: 2

      If linux did something like this to microsoft? could you explain how the entity Linux could do anything to M$, much less proprietarize itself to discriminate against hardware not licensed from this entity "Linux" of which you speak?
      The controllers are disguised USB. As such, while M$ is within their legal rights to include whatever non-standard "features" like differently shaped plugs and occlusion of ranges of USB id's, other companies are also within their rights to make interoperable products without paying royalties if they can impliment in an informationally "clean" environmentn (somewhat easy given that its USB).
      I hope I'm not casting pearls before trolls, but I have a feeling I am:)

    4. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 1

      I am unaware of any features in Linux that try to lock out other companies such as M#cr@s*ft. That of course is the difference.

    5. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by cduffy · · Score: 1, Redundant

      MS would be stupid to charge an outrageous price for a spare controller in a market which they "own". The reason I say this is because if they do, then more and more people will look to alternatives, which will in turn decrease sales of MS's controller.

      The entire point of this exercise is that they've ensured that there are no alternatives to their controller. Unless you're talking about folks looking for alternatives to the Xbox as a whole on account of the price of controllers -- and as most people in the market for controllers have already bought the consoles, they tend to be a fairly captive audiance.

      Yes, some hacking may go on -- but the 1% of people who may hack controllers from a different source to make them work is nothing compared to the 40% price increase [warning: number pulled out of ass!] they can enforce by eliminating competition.

    6. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, stupid. No competiton=increased prices. Very simple.

    7. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Pentagram · · Score: 2

      What!? That's ludicrous. Why would 'Linux' ever do that?

      The obvious point here is that Linux is software and the Xbox is hardware. And rather than stopping MS software running on Linux systems the community is actively developing software to allow it (think WINE.)

      Or if you were talking about locking out hardware... what!? MS hardware has got quite a good reputation, and rather than lauding such a move, there would be lots of pissed-off Linux users with useless hardware.

      I think you're just karma-whoring with the flamebait comment as a bit of reverse psychology.

    8. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he's a troll - look at his user history. I think he's just thick as pigshit.

    9. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      my karma at the time of this posting is 50, thank you very much. I don't whore, I give an opinion. My comment on Linux versus MS is that if the role was reversed, and some company everyone LIKED did this, it wouldn't recieve any comment what so ever, but since it's MS, it's oh so horrible. thanks for sharing.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    10. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Merlynnus · · Score: 1

      The entire point of this exercise is that they've ensured that there are no alternatives to their controller.

      Oh look, pulling more than numbers out of your ass. InterAct, MatCatz, and others already ship alternatives to "their" (ie MS) controller. And, it's been confirmed that the Japanese controllers work with the North American boxes.

    11. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      my karma at the time of this posting is 50, thank you very much. I don't whore, I give an opinion. My comment on Linux versus MS is that if the role was reversed, and some company everyone LIKED did this, it wouldn't recieve any comment what so ever, but since it's MS, it's oh so horrible. thanks for sharing.

      But of course that's so groundless as to warrant the adjective "retarded". Or, more accurately, "really, really retarded, not to mention completely imaginary".

      The reason no one likes MS is beacuse of this kind of thing. The reason we like companies is because they don't do things like this. If a company we liked did this, we'd probably start not-liking them. Point your eyeballs at the google story and how many people were ready to turn on google based on the baseless suggestion that they would be altering their search results based on sponsorship.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by tuck182 · · Score: 1
      my karma at the time of this posting is 50, thank you very much. I don't whore, I give an opinion.

      Just because you're not very good at it doesn't mean you're not doing it. ;-)

    13. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Ogerman · · Score: 2

      No matter what your take on MS, remember, they are a business, and it MAKES BUSINESS sense for them to do this.

      Incorrect, my friend. Many things that make 'business sense' are unethical. It makes good 'business sense' to exploit overseas sweatshop labor to lower manufacturing costs. But that's certainly not ethical.

    14. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by cduffy · · Score: 0

      Very well, the point then is reduction of foreign competition rather than all competition altogether. Nonetheless, my point stands: Reducing competition (limiting alternatives) allows a supplier to raise their prices above what they would be otherwise, and those people willing to modify the excluded (in this case foreign) product to work correctly are in such a minority as to be an insignificant consideration. Certainly the reduction of competition does not serve the interests of the consumer.

    15. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One good thing from all this, I believe this will drive the prices down for individual controllers for the X-box, which is a good thing.

      Are you nuts?! Yell me when the lack of competition did lower the prices. I'll tell you when... never. You sicken me, you and your pro-MS propaganda.

    16. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exploit?
      Do you want these people to have jobs and get paid $1 an hour or do you want them to sit all day doing nothing (without getting paid of course)?
      That is the alternative.
      Who is more ethical here , people like you who do absolutely NOTHING, or corporations that provide means to survive for these locals ?

    17. Re:Pot, kettle, black... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get lost Christian bitch.
      Whine, whine, whine and whine.
      That is all you can do.

  25. Correct me if I'm wrong... by brogdon · · Score: 2

    But the USB ID of a device is spat out by (usually) a little chip on the device. Couldn't controller manufacturers build two of the chips onto the board along with a switch to change between them? Why is this such a big deal?

    --


    This tagline is umop apisdn.
  26. What did you expect? by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is in competition with a Japanesse company. My understanding is that most of these controllers would be manufactured in Japan. From a business standpoint it makes sense. You lock your competitors out of your market. Unfortunately M$ can't be (rightfully) accused of abusing a monopoly in this case, because they have competition from Sony and Nintendo.

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
  27. xbox hackability by theDEFT · · Score: 1

    This definitely wont be an issue for me. I seem to like original controllers with any game unit anyway.
    However...I think one of the most promising features about the xbox as of now, is it's potential to be modded and i'm sure it won't be long before little things like this are overcome.

    1. Re:xbox hackability by Hormonal · · Score: 1
      I think the issue with being unable to use Japanese controllers with a US XBox is because the Japanese controllers are a little smaller than their counterparts in the states, and easier for those with smallish (or more normally-sized) hands to handle.

      I have always gotten burned on third-party controllers, and now I refuse to use anything not made by the same manufacturer as the console. However, I think using a Microsoft-sanctioned Japanese controller would fall under that category.

    2. Re:xbox hackability by Ransom342 · · Score: 1
      During the second half of the year, NCS pre-occupies itself with Gamecube sales. The Japanese launch is welcomed warmly, with mighty volumes shipped to domestic and international customers. When the Gamecube modification [USA/JPN] is discovered, sales spike as Nintendo fans scramble to get their own international CUBE. Microsoft ships X-Box to the USA market but due to LAME distribution, NCS side-steps the big mess. NCS re-enters the Japanese toy business with Parappa plushes and Samba plushes proving their mettle in a fickle buyer's market. Candy Toys and various other products are dabbled in as the holiday season rolls around.


      Taken From http://www.ncsx.com/newcllct.htm

      From http://www.microsoft.com/retail/xbox/QuickFAQ.asp
      6. Will the Japaneese controller work with the North American Xbox
      A. Yes


      NCSX has only dabble with xbox and certainly does not qualify as a credible "NEWS" site for Xbox Information. I am sure they did a good job of slowing down the preorder of imported controllers from competitors sites though.

  28. Another great misrepresentation from Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Gosh, what a great post. THE VERY PAGE YOU LINKED TO says that Microsoft told them the Japanese controllers will work with US xboxes! You call this a NEWS site, shouldn't you do some basic fact-checking of the info you post? Or does your mailer auto-block anything to or from Microsoft?

    1. Re:Another great misrepresentation from Slashdot. by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Or does your mailer auto-block anything to or from Microsoft? [Emphasis added]
      you do some basic fact-checking of the info you post?
      What does a mailer have to do with pages linked to?

  29. Not true. by drfrank · · Score: 5, Informative

    First hand account. Japanese controller works with US Xbox.

    1. Re:Not true. by MikeyNg · · Score: 2, Informative

      First hand account. Japanese controller works with US Xbox.


      That's interesting, considering the Japanese release for the X-Box is not until 2/22, which puts it at least a day away. Of course, you could have gotten early access to the peripherals, but forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical.

      --
      Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
    2. Re:Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, the guy's user number is like a fifth of your own, of course he's credible! :-)

    3. Re:Not true. by amackay · · Score: 1

      well I have been using Japanese controllers for about 5-6 months now (the first one was an awesome all white prototype).

      In the game industry it is quite easy to get a Japanese Xbox controller. I use mine to play halo on my brothers retail Xbox, no problems.

      Of course these are all just pre-release controllers, MS may fuck things up for the retail Japanese controllers.

      I also have to say that the Japanese Xbox controllers rock. they are the best controllers I have ever used. (and the US Xbox controllers are the worst controller ever invented, I'll take an original atari 1 button stick over one of them)

    4. Re:Not true. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Hah, amateurs.

  30. Arn't the Japanese controllers smaller? by niftyeric · · Score: 1

    That's the only reason I'd be interested in them. The US X-Box controller seems too bulky for me. I'm sure it's just a matter of time before there is some sort of adapter.

    --
    proton != antielectron
    1. Re:Arn't the Japanese controllers smaller? by pjkacmar · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Japanese controllers are smaller. One of the big complaints about the Xbox controller is the size of the controller.

      Now I could see if Microsoft wanted to stop third parties not paying licensing fees from making controllers, but I can't see why Microsoft itself would want to make it's own controllers (albeit MS-Japan) not work.

      If they do work, Microsoft just gets more money from people who don't like the standard US controllers but prefer not to buy 3rd party ones.

    2. Re:Arn't the Japanese controllers smaller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care if the US controllers are huge. I have BIG HANDS and BIG FEET and...what goes with them (nudge, nudge, wink, wink, knowing glance).

  31. Hack it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Someone hack this and post a link so we can
    get on with life.

  32. Well, if you think about it... by syzxys · · Score: 1

    ...those controllers tend to wear out pretty quickly. Maybe MS did a study and decided they'd be missing out on a lot of long-range profits if they let other people sell controllers. Maybe they don't want the price of controllers driven down by competition...

    *or* maybe they're just thinking in the short term, and some middle manager in a mid-life crisis somewhere thinks he's oh so great because he can Bend Consumers To His Will.

    After all, look what clones did for the PC market... but also remember, IBM isn't selling them anymore. Still, it's *controllers* for heaven's sake, not entire consoles! Oh well, I guess we'll see programmable USB packet editors showing up pretty soon (that could be pretty cool anyway. :-)

    ---
    Windows 2000/XP stable? safe? secure? 5 lines of simple C code say otherwise!
    1. Re:Well, if you think about it... by pclminion · · Score: 2
      If Microsoft had wanted this, they could have just come up with a proprietary interface protocol with a really weird connector, both of which would be patented.

      Of course, doing this would mean they would have to write drivers for this weird device, which they were probably too lazy to do...

      BTW, if you are a big company and you want to prevent competitors from manufacturing peripherals for your product, is there any law that would allow you do to so?

    2. Re:Well, if you think about it... by syzxys · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft had wanted this, they could have just come up with a proprietary interface protocol with a really weird connector, both of which would be patented.

      That's true, obviously it's been done before. The thing is, USB is extremely cheap (chipsets are only a couple $$, and cables aren't bad either), plus a lot of people know it since it's a pretty open standard, so you don't have to train people to use it. I mean, we're talking R&D, manufacturing, etc. lots of money here, not just drivers. Instead, they (predictably) choose to take an open-looking standard and twist it so nobody but them can play. How is this any different than what they've been up to their entire (corporate) life?

      if you are a big company and you want to prevent competitors from manufacturing peripherals for your product, is there any law that would allow you do to so?

      AFAIK, you can patent the interface. That's about it (copyright doesn't apply, and you can't call it a trade secret because - *doh* - millions of people have it.)

      ---
      Have you crashed Windows XP with a simple printf recently? Try it!
    3. Re:Well, if you think about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can bring the Linux kernel down in 3 lines! open(); close(); write();

    4. Re:Well, if you think about it... by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Seems like it was proprietary interfaces that got IBM into anti-trust trouble way back when.

      Takes out NT and 2000 nicely. So far I've been spared XP.

  33. What's the point? by qa'lth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there even a purpose to doing this? The people who would normally be buying import stuff will just buy a $5 converter to use the peripherals they lock out, and the people who don't import controllers won't have a problem, since it doesn't affect them.

    Chock this one up to 'annoying the community'.

    1. Re:What's the point? by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      The point is, Joe Sixpack with two teeth and an eighth grade education doesn't know anything about USB region encoding. He just knows that he has to buy the "Mahkruhshast ahpruvd kuntruluh."

      Now, if enough people do buy this stuff, M$ will come up with a more bulletproof way of locking out the "unapproved" controllers.

  34. This just in... by steeljc0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, I think this was just a "bug fix" and will become the standard in "Microsoft X-Box for Workgroups," due out next year.

    --
    -J Steele-
  35. Change USB ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    QTools allows you to modify the ID of USB devices. This has been used for a while to get non-3Com USB ethernet devices to work with the 3Com Audreys that 3Com created and dropped last year. http://www.klsi.com/drivers/index.htm - look for qttoolsinstall.exe

    1. Re:Change USB ID by stubear · · Score: 1

      This is great but Microsoft uses a proprietary design on their USB plugs.

    2. Re:Change USB ID by lcreech · · Score: 1

      Their link is bad. This is the correct one:
      http://www.klsi.com/drivers/device_drivers/q ttools .zip

    3. Re:Change USB ID by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Not very universal then is it?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    4. Re:Change USB ID by got_lost · · Score: 1

      umm not that either. but here worked for me:

      http://www.klsi.com/drivers/tools/qttoolsinstall .e xe

    5. Re:Change USB ID by got_lost · · Score: 1

      sorry folks typo this is the good link.

    6. Re:Change USB ID by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      It's the Microsoft version of universal.
      Another innovation.

      Is is just a rumor, or is .NET full of holes?

  36. So... by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 5, Funny

    So you're telling me that the new japanese PleasureVibe erotic force-feedback controller I got off Ebay won't work when I get shot on Halo? God damn that Microsoft...

    --
    --
    1. Re:So... by fobbman · · Score: 2

      Of course not. It would directly compete with the unit they've designed to aide the home user in understanding their Windows and Office licensing schemes.

    2. Re:So... by Fesh · · Score: 2

      ROFL! I had mods just a few minutes ago but spent 'em all... Should have used one here. Props!

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  37. Soon on Lik-Sang (not really) by billcopc · · Score: 2

    If this is true, then we'll start seeing controllers with a user-selectable USB ID. Or just some software patch that will disable or work around the checks. On the PSX you can get an unlicensed yet professionally pressed disc that allows you to boot import games and copies without a modchip. Some asian pseudo-piracy company will simply produce a dvd-based XBox mod that will do whatever the users are willing to pay for.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  38. Anti-trust violation? by CharlezManning · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm no lawyer, but to take deliberate steps to subvert an open specification and lock out competition is surely an anti-trust violation.

    1. Re:Anti-trust violation? by Inti · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Oy.

      Look, nobody could argue that MS has monopoly power in the gaming console market. Therefore, antotrust law doesn't even enter into it.

    2. Re:Anti-trust violation? by IronChef · · Score: 2


      Horsefeathers. This is exactly like region encoding on software, which is done all the time so the licensor can carve the world up into closed markets more easily.

      It sucks for the consumer but there isn't anything illegal about it.

    3. Re:Anti-trust violation? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Look, nobody could argue that MS has monopoly power in the gaming console market. Therefore, antotrust law doesn't even enter into it.

      Agreed. In fact, a move like this might drive off potential buyers who are educated about this little fact. I certainly won't buy one now. Not if I can only buy my controllers from Microsoft (or MS approved company paying royalties).

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    4. Re:Anti-trust violation? by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      It's nice of you to stick it out and wait for Joe's Trucking and Plumbing to be allowed to make Xbox controllers without paying licensing, while we enjoy playing Halo, Dead or Alive 3, Jet Set Radio Future, and Wreckless.

      "Gosh, I'd definitely get this console, if only companies that don't care about me could make cheap accessories without giving anything back to the console manufacturer that makes it possible."

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    5. Re:Anti-trust violation? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      It's nice of you to stick it out and wait for Joe's Trucking and Plumbing to be allowed to make Xbox controllers without paying licensing,

      Hey, I think they would be uniquely qualified to design the appropriate controller for that new "Waterworks" game. Why should they have to pay licensing for that? :)

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  39. Hmm learn to count by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    The Xbox costs >500$ and a controller costs what 60$ at the most? I could care less about saving the 10$ on a {insert asian country name} knock-off really since I will just use a real MS controller for my >500$ machine.

    That's like putting a AMB CPU inside your Socket A board because the AMB is 10$ cheaper. I'd rather spend the extra 10$ and know that the CPU I bought was a legit non-knock off.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Hmm learn to count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd rather spend the extra 10$ and know that the CPU I bought was a legit non-knock off."

      That's because you are rich AND stupid.

    2. Re:Hmm learn to count by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Lets see spend 170$ on an AMD or 160$ on a clone? hmm...

      Spend 15K on a Ford or 14900 on a Phored?

      If the diff was significant I would consider. Thats why I bought my MII back in the day instead of a PMMX. Cyrix was rather "unknown" at the time but their prices were amazing. I bought a Mobo [with sound/video] and the cpu [a MI 133mhz] for about 150$ whereas the P133 alone was 90$.

      When it comes to game console clones you often don't save much so you might as well by brand name. At least then you have some form of assurance the product will work with your device.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  40. US only USB IDs by chibitoku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um, since USB ciructs are easy to program for, has anyone thought about using a USB hub on a linux box to gather packets from the "illegal" controller ,spoof the ID, and send the packets on to the XBOX and vice versa?

    Just my two cents... ^_^

    1. Re:US only USB IDs by pclminion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It could be even easier, I think. Couldn't you just build a little widget that sits between the controller and the X-Box that rewrites the USB ID on each packet that goes through? Such a device could be mass-produced for pennies...

      Any people who are more familiar with USB than I am? Is this a feasible idea?

    2. Re:US only USB IDs by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you could even make your XBox think the controller is an iMac mouse. As soon as you did it however you'd be carted to jail for violating the DMCA.

      Someone already posted a link to a program that allows you to edit USB ID's.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    3. Re:US only USB IDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB 1.0 is not peer to peer. PC is the controller & joystick is the slave. Can't see how you make your PC look like a slave.

  41. Why? by PenguinX · · Score: 2

    Aside from staggering releases why would you want to do this? It only makes preservation of the content more difficult. Doesn't region encoding things fly in the face of the entire "global economy" concept? I never have understood why movie and software companies go out of their way to make an international market difficult, impossible, or possibly even illegal. Any insight?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off the top of my head I would think that it complicates the distribution channel for knockoffs. If you are creating knockoffs you must now get the specific product to specific markets.

  42. update from website at 2:28pm EST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    * Addendum at 02:28PM EST *
    A lot of e-mails have poured in from other sources and developers these past few hours. A call from an Microsoft employee also came in. The Japanese X-Box joypad should work with USA consoles. We'll confirm this tonight once our suppliers test the joypad with some USA games we shipped them earlier this week. If all is well, then our shipments of Japanese X-Box joypads won't go to waste after all.

  43. Wow, who knew USB would bring this? by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Amazing. I remember when they told us the CPUID number would not be a big deal. But others coutered it would.

    Now they have done it with USB. This looks like arbitrary restriction, and I can't see why it should be allowed. We really need a strong tech department within the US government to monitor the anti-competitive use of technological advancements.

    Of course, lets be sure that department is not the take too...

    1. Re:Wow, who knew USB would bring this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CPUID number is about identifying a single product from another similar.

      USB id's are about identifying the type of the device.

      Comparision would be closer, if Windows wouldn't want to talk to some special Linux keyboards (extra buttons to start gimp?) but only to MS approved ones.

  44. That's what you get - LESS CHOICE by IQ · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Microsoft is evil. Bill is a convicted Monopolist. The company should be shut down. Do not buy an XBox - they are just Trojan hardware for Mr. Bill to continue to Try and control the world.

    Buy a PS2 instead - then run the Linux kit on it...

    --
    Adults are obsolete children. - Dr. Seuss
  45. filter by jrs+1 · · Score: 0

    even if this worked like the headline says, how long would it take for someone to make a usb filter which changes all the ids to your region? my guess is this: not very long.

  46. Coming Soon... by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You will have to pass a political orthodoxy test to get past the boot screen.

    Q: What is the role of the US DOJ?
    A: A) To promote and smooth the growth of large multinationals; B) To ensure the destruction of subversive whacko religious groups; C)To cuddle up in the Executive's lap and purr contentedly; D) All of the above.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Coming Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E. -- As a training ground for up and coming M$ lawyers

  47. Re:And how long will it take for a smart adaptor.. by coreman · · Score: 1

    A Smart USB hub with built in USB ID Masquerading.

    Seriously, most manufacturers have used something similar to this in the past. They'll pick a custom connector that they hold the patent on or make the interface proprietary. This was the rage before PCs started pushing FOR standards in order to allow multiply sourced options.

  48. The headline shows the real reason to worry by syzxys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Xbox To Use Region-Locked Peripherals

    True, maybe the Japanese controllers will work with the MS consoles, but we need to look beyond the immediate future here.

    Hmm, let's think here...

    1. MS (rumored to be) using region locking, *in the context of*
    2. the well-known DVD region fiasco, equals...

    Well, at any rate, it sure makes me nervous. Think about when they start selling region-locked Ethernet, or region locked hard drives, etc. add-ons for the Xbox. Region locking in general is a way for large companies to restrain trade contrary to international agreements. It was never a problem before recently because either (a) nobody thought of it (doubtful) or (b) the technological means to do it weren't around until recently.

    DVD's have recently proven (in some people's minds, anyway) that "consumers" (if we're all consumers, who the hell is producing, btw?) will put up with this region locking restraint of trade nonsense. And it's a well known fact that the courts are so far behind in their understanding of technology that they won't figure out what's going on until nobody even remembers the way things used to be. I mean, "Microsoft" and "restraint of trade" -- who would have ever thought of those two words in the same sentence? :-) IOW, this doesn't surprise me in the least.

    At least I know which gaming console I won't be buying anytime soon, though! :-)

    ---
    Have you crashed Windows XP with a simple printf recently? Try it!
    1. Re:The headline shows the real reason to worry by sulli · · Score: 2
      Restraint of trade is exactly the issue here. Region coding is the best example of an "agreement, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade" I have ever heard of! It does need to be stopped before the kind of crap you describe, though I am skeptical that region-locked ethernet etc. could ever work in the market.

      Fortunately some countries (e.g. New Zealand) have already banned it.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    2. Re:The headline shows the real reason to worry by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Besides restraint of trade, in the US this should be considered "price-fixing." Unfortunately, since US law doesn't protect people living in other countries it has no reach there. Now, if the US had been broken into two or more regions, then interstate commerce would have been affected, federal laws would have been brought into play and region-coding might have been stopped before it started...Just imagine the outcry if someone bought a DVD from a BestBuy in New York and couldn't play it in the DVD player they bought from BestBuy in California - more lawsuits than you could shake a stick at.

  49. durp by 56ksucks · · Score: 0

    Yet another reason on a very long list of reasons why I don't want one!

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  50. XBox suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering current trend in the evolution of 3D hardware, Xbox will get obsolete after couple of months. Isn't it anyway designed for people scared of today's normal-people-unfriendly computers?

    1. Re:XBox suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How old are you?

    2. Re:XBox suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could you elaborate?

    3. Re:XBox suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm 38, but I act about 12 or 13...

  51. Obscure Controllers by Apreche · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is perfectly fine if you think about cheap knockoffs that don't give Microsoft Licensing fees. But I think about my PSX with Dance Dance Revolution. Obscure peripherals like dance pads, light guns (nowadays), etc. Might be produced in Japan and not in the US, meaning XBox owners won't be able to play some games with the peripherals they desire. If this happens however, I guarantee a mod-chip inside of a couple months. And a perfect mod chip inside of 6.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Obscure Controllers by Tofuhead · · Score: 2

      Unlicensed peripherals have been a thriving business for years for manufacturers like InterAct, Mad Catz, Nuby, Redant, Innovation, and countless others. Nintendo, Sega, and Sony have never had a problem with them; they just endorse licensed peripherals and allow licensees to use the Nintendo/Sega/etc. logo in their advertising and packaging. Call Nintendo about the GBA, and they will direct you to the Sun Seibu Light Boy Advance light, not the Shark Light or Worm Light or whatever. They just ignore the unlicensed third parties, because they're not doing anything illegal or particularly harmful to the console manufacturers' businesses.

      For MS to counter this trend (by enforcing their license and discriminating against unlicensed hardware) would be a first. Region discrimination on software is one thing. License discrimination on software is another. But region and license discrimination on peripheral hardware makes little business sense to me. If they've set up mechanisms by which this could happen, they'd be foolish to implement them. I doubt that they would have, though.

      < tofuhead >

      --
      It is still the dark of night.
    2. Re:Obscure Controllers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the gayest sig I have ever read. It couldn't possibly be worse.

    3. Re:Obscure Controllers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allmost all of those companies, plus Thrustmaster, already have or will have controllers for the X-Box. This is about region lockout, not 3rd party component lockout.

    4. Re:Obscure Controllers by Tofuhead · · Score: 1

      That's exactly the point I was making to the parent post, as well as what I posted earlier. Thanks for the clarification attempt, though.

      < tofuhead >

      --
      It is still the dark of night.
  52. MS innovation -- the RSB standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the lastest case of embrace and extend, Microsoft has extended the old and out-moded Universal Serial Bus (USB) standard with their new Regional Serial Bus (RSB) standard.

    "RSB is so much better than USB," a spokesmarketer explained, "Because there's none of that silly 'Universal' overhead -- I mean, programming a device to work anywhere in the universe? How many extraterrestrials are actually using this? I can't name any, so it certainly looks like wasted effort to me. We're just making life easier by reducing the amount of testing OEMs have to do on their equipment -- no more of this silly Mission to Mars business just to see if the buttons can still be pressed."

    When asked for comment, Zheeb N'Vgali said "Berp meeka wut Microsoft saava wunga customer-hating bastards." before going back to tuning its interplanetary ion cannon.

    In related news, NASA is adding its voice to the anti-Microsoft lawsuit uproar, charging Microsoft with anti-competitive practices and willfully eroding its consumer base.

  53. Take a peek at... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [http://www.genitaldrive.com]http://www.genitaldri ve.com

  54. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    &#31

  55. What's even the point of this? by Nijika · · Score: 2
    I'm sure the entire planet is starting to resent being chained and restricted to regions due to marketing enviornments. Have we really come to the point where we will let marketing and sales dictate what we can and can not do?

    I guess so.

    I'd like a ticket off this rock now please.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:What's even the point of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd like a ticket off this rock now please.


      Your ticket, sir.
  56. It is a cost Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make one xbox.

    Sell DVD Kit

    Ensure that Microsoft does not sell out of region dvd players

    It is that simple

  57. Isn't the pond on our right? by mactari · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Update: this doesn't mean all peripherals will be
    > region encoded. Apparently Joypads will work on
    > both sides of the pond.

    I'm sorry, I thought "the pond" generally was understood to mean the Atlantic, as in, "Tea at 5? Sure, I'll just jump in my Concorde and jump 'cross the pond." So do you mean joypads (or are "Joypads" and "joypads" different pond-jumping beasts?) can be imported to the US from the UK and the rest of the EU but not Japan? Horribly confusing.

    And yes, for your crazy peeps down under, the subject meant to say "Isn't the pond on our left?"

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
    1. Re:Isn't the pond on our right? by emmons · · Score: 1

      "The Pond" = "The Ocean"

      It's not specific as to which one, but you're right, people usually use it to refer to the Atlantic.

      An aside: You need to work on your style. In this post you come off as an annoying idiot. A good troll usually tries to make his posts seem informed and well thought out, giving the impression that the poster knows what he's talking about. It's much more entertaining for the rest of us.

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  58. Ugh! by nocorvair · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can't imagine this causing much Joy!

    --
    NOCORVAIR /insert witty quote here/
  59. Is this correct? by SuperMacNinja · · Score: 1

    I don't think this is true. The site linked in the article here now states "A call from an Microsoft employee also came in. The Japanese X-Box joypad should work with USA consoles." Just a heads up. Make sure you read the stories before you get too fired up here.

    1. Re:Is this correct? by SuperMacNinja · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, I'm an idiot. the newspost clearly states that pads will work on both sides of the "pond". Start flaming away.

  60. Shouldn't USB be renamed then? by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, it's no longer "Universal", is it? Perhaps it could be called RSB, for "Regional Serial Bus", or perhaps NSB for "National Serial Bus".

    Seriously, I can only see one or two reasons why someone would want to implement this region locking:

    First, I doubt a domestic company would want to take tech support calls for foreign-made equipment. And, yes, you know some clueless fool will call MS up, waste their time, bitching about why his Far East ContollerPad isn't working. Worse, perhaps they aren't tested to similar standards and could pose a threat to the Xbox. Who knows?

    Second, and this is the more insidious one, they might do this because of internal competition, the same reason DVD region locking is used. Regional branches of the same company making the same product may have wildly divergent pricing and release schedules. Since Asia usually gets the cool toys first, the North American division wants to protect its turf by preventing imports of the Asian goods until they can get around to marketing the product domestically. While that makes good business sense, it's typically used to hide a serious case of "head up the ass" when the domestic vendor is slow to put out new products.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    1. Re:Shouldn't USB be renamed then? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      Given that co.s like MS CHARGE you to call their tech support line, I doubt they wouldn't want you on hold for an hour b4 telling you your Far East ContollerPad isn't supported.

    2. Re:Shouldn't USB be renamed then? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      "
      First, I doubt a domestic company would want to take tech support calls for foreign-made equipment. And, yes, you know some clueless fool will call MS up, waste their time, bitching about why his Far East ContollerPad isn't working. Worse, perhaps they aren't tested to similar standards and could pose a threat to the Xbox. Who knows?"

      also in several other threads;

      AFAIK they make the pads in far-east mumbojumbo-hilipatilattaa-countries anyways. same place where most of the tech stuff is actually manufactured(god i miss my made-in-ireland kbrd),it's just if they can/cannot make the money come to their pockets.

      and they already have clueless fools calling them why doesnt this and this work.(because windows, and to be honest, you really gotta be a clueless fool to call MS-hotline)

      anyways, this is not such a big deal _yet_ since all the devices for xbox work on all 'regs. it's just something they might do.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  61. Doh! Should have read the article! by Hormonal · · Score: 1
    All right, /.ers that made it this far in the thread, you caught me.

    I didn't read the article before posting the parent, and I just realized that they were suing Sony too.

    Just wanted to let everyone know that yes, I'm an ass, and yes, I know it now, thank you very much. (I always kind of figures as much; I just never had any empirical proof.)

  62. Yes by sulli · · Score: 2

    Sony is evil too

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  63. Makes sense sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This whole thing probably was done for the European Market. Microsoft charges over here about 500-600$ for the X-Box so they try to prevent cross imports from the US and Japan with region locks everywhere. Since I'm not a console owner I don't really care but this whole scheme might backfire, since the EU already investigates region locks. And for region locks in hardware there really is no explanation thank to lock out competition and keep prices high. (With movies they always can say there are different distributors in different regions etc...)

  64. MS says: the drivers now part of the OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Richmod, WA. Microsoft today announced that the decision behind today's announcement is that the drivers for the devices are now part of the operating system. Microsoft spokeperson said, "This was the only logical decision. Once the Internet Exporer became part of the OS, we realized that only controller made by Microsoft could be working. It is physically impossible to replace them with other drivers."

    In the related news, Microsoft announced Windows CE for pace-makers. The operating system includes the IE and the USB joystick drivers.

  65. The real reason behind this! by Arcturax · · Score: 1

    Microsoft can't go letting us have 3rd party controllers because we might get controlers which fit reasonably in our hands. That might just even the odds when playing against Bill Gates with his custom made "fits properly in your hand" controller. It might even let us play better than him! Now we can't go 0wning the richest man in the world in Halo now can we? ;)

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  66. Why they make alternate controllers... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2


    Did anyone think that the whole reason why people are buying alternate Xbox controllers is because they are so unwieldy and large that it could crush a small child under the sheer weight of it?

    Its really a safety concern when you think about it... :)

    That someone is trying to restrict an individual's safety by blocking overseas sales, well, then, I say, "Yo Ho HO! Avast ye mateys! Come and get me, Customs! ARRRRRGGGGHHH!"

  67. Oh, Joy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Apparently Joypads will work on both sides of the pond."

    Oh, joy!

  68. Not true - it isn't about cheap knockoffs by gosand · · Score: 2

    I don't think this is about cheap knockoffs at all. It is about control. If Japan can produce something that isn't offered here, why not allow it? It isn't the same as DVDs. Region encoding is so that people in one country cannot view DVDs before they are released in that country, but eventually they will be released. The companies want to CONTROL the release of them. For game consoles it is different, they want to CONTROL what you use, not because they are going to offer the same thing at a higher price, they simply are not going to offer it. That is what makes no sense. They want to make sure that you aren't able to get a better product than what you are offering, so you have no choice but to buy theirs.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Not true - it isn't about cheap knockoffs by HKTiger · · Score: 1
      It *is* the same as DVDs, because not all DVDs are released in all regions. If you doubt my words, try looking for region-specific Asian DVDs in, say, the US, or Australia: a fairly small proportion of titles is released, and some of those that are get butchered by the company that buys distribution rights (eg dubbing, cutting, replacing the soundtrack). If you want an honest copy of the film, you have to buy from the source, which implies a different region.

      And please don't immediately think "Oh, but it's only weirdo anime/kungfu/triad-junky fanboys/grrls who care about that crap anyway". There are a buttload of excellent films coming out of Hong Kong, Korea, and Japan, as well as Thailand, Taiwan, mainland China, Vietnam, and elsewhere, from arthouse to grindhouse, or anything in between.

      This fits with your complaint about the consoles: if you have the opportunity to buy at all, you may be forced to buy the inferior product/DVD because it's the only one available. Unless, of course, you have a region-free player or a console with a corresponding mod...

  69. Boycott XBox! by andaru · · Score: 1
    The more you buy from MS, the more you empower them to make this kind of thing real, like:

    "The XBox is yours, but if you want to play any of the new games, you will have to rent a chip from us."

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  70. License to operate a car by Loundry · · Score: 1

    Hm... and if you don't need a license to operate a fork, why should you be required to have a license to operate a car?

    In the USA, you do not need a license to operate a car. It is perfectly legal to drive a car without a driver's license provided you are on private property. The license is required only when you venture out on to public roads in your automobile.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  71. You all missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is how MS is going to prevent people from plugging USB Keyboards into the XBox; it should be obvious.

  72. Big deal. PIC's to the rescue. by torpor · · Score: 2

    Really. Big deal. It'd take me a couple of days to have a functioning USB vendor ID "filter/remapper" device functioning with a PIC and a USB chip. Total cost in parts, about $20.

    Open source it, open source the hardware, put it on the web for Taiwanese mfr's to make freely at their own will and bundle with any cheap XBox peripherals they choose.

    This sort of region locking is just stupid.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  73. AV region locking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adam Venus has region locking on his penis. His is set to the anus region.

  74. Preservation of artifacts by andaru · · Score: 2
    Two points about copy protection:

    1.) It prevents people from making backups of works which they purchased for the purpose of preserving their investment. You really should have the right install/run your software from a backup copy and and keep your master copy locked away in your firesafe.

    2.) Their should be encouragement to preserve these works (some of them, anyway) for the future, especially since we haven't established the life span of these new media.

    On top of this, increases in copyright duration, can remove the incentive to preserve a work for long enough to enter the public domain (so more stuff gets lost forever).

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  75. The downside of all this by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    If you remove the ability to region lock, then many companies will probably cease to sell their products in the poorer countries. The end result is that importation would probably slow down as well, since new laws would have to be created to stop the flood of low-cost knockoffs from outside the U.S. (note: I say U.S. because we are the biggest damn consumer as well as producer/marketer in the world). Patent laws would still prevent those products from being made in the poor countries (like they respect patent laws anyway) and so the availability will drop.

    This is pretty bad news for world trade and may lead to less trade between countries in the long run. Some are going to see this as a good thing (the anti-globalism people), but it can eventually lead to a lot of bad things as well, including increased tariffs and lower profits all around.

    The third-world countries won't be affected too much by all this (they ignore the patent laws anyway and have a burgeoning black market in knockoffs), but the first-world countries are gonna suck it up ... bad.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    1. Re:The downside of all this by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      Do you really think it would be a bad thing for, say, India if they never see an Xbox, GC or PS2? There are useful computer systems that increase the average knowledge and communication in a community, then there are video games. (This from someone not sitting 5m from 10 video games consoles.)

    2. Re:The downside of all this by swb · · Score: 2

      If you remove the ability to region lock, then many companies will probably cease to sell their products in the poorer countries. The end result is that importation would probably slow down as well, since new laws would have to be created to stop the flood of low-cost knockoffs from outside the U.S

      I think you've got it half right. Lack of region locks prevents low-cost selling in poor countries due to fears of re-importation. They're probably more afraid, though, of the loss in poor countries from outright piracy if they're not offered a deeply discounted product.

      Poor countries aren't going to stop buying $5 DVDs, they're going to stop buying official $5 DVDs. They will continue to buy pirated DVDs at that price point, which will become more prevelant.

      What galls me, though, is if they can sell DVDs in India for $5 and make money why don't they do that here? I own exactly 1 DVD (Mad Max deluxe, has Australian sound track) at $20 each. If DVDs were $5 I'd own a lot more. They're not, so I just refuse to buy them and either rent them once for $2 or watch them on TV for nothing.

      The motion picture people are losing a shitpile of money on people like me just because they want to make their 500% margin here in the "rich" US.

    3. Re:The downside of all this by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      The exportation of DVDs will most likely grind to a slow halt and India (as an example) will be forced to make do with bootlegs shot at a theatre. I don't know if this will matter much to the average consumer over there, but making a guess - probably not. American movies are pretty damn popular all over the world, even amongst the people that hate us the most (The French, most Arab countries, anyone south of the equator except the Australians and New Zealand).

      As for the price difference, it has to do with relative value. $5 in India is quite a lot of money (approx 243 rupees as of today's valuation) to some people. The aggregate sales of DVD distributors in India is probably as strong in that market as some of the distributors stateside (NOTE: I'm guessing on that - but it seems a reasonable assumption). The relative value of a DVD in each market as a total of spending for the person is probably about the same on a per item basis.

      Now, this says nothing about how many DVD's your average Indian buys (probably not many), but it seems reasonable to assume that DVD's are priced according to the market they are going to be sold in by approximately the same formula wherever you go.

      We've only mentioned DVD's. This does not account for other entertainment items like CD's, computers, game consoles, TV's, radios (all of which are produced in Japan, but the theory is the same), and other American products (or American-company branded products).

      Once you start introducing tariffs on some items, eventually other items get dragged into the mix. We had a little dustup with France a while back over their huge tariffs on some items we exported to them (which somebody got a bug up their ass because it was against their culture) and imposed counter-tariffs on certain French products, which hurt their markets. They laid the blame on us, we laid the blame on them, and everybody who actually wanted the products had to pay higher prices.

      What it boils down to is that we pay a higher price because we have a higher standard of living and proportionally higher incomes. Even your average dead-ass-broke, digging-for-change-in-the-couch college student lives better than most of the people in the world. I speak from experience on that because I barely cleared $10,000 a year while I was in college and that includes student loans each semester and working part-time at the college. I still managed to keep a roof over my head and AC and beer.

      So, while removing region coding initially impacts only a few items, the effects can (and probably will) ripple out over time. Get used to it - you'll probably be paying $15 a can for Fosters before it's all said and done. And kiss those British import CD's goodbye.

      ON ANOTHER NOTE: I quite agree that region coding is highly annoying, but I go along with it because I understand why they do it. If the US would tone down the aggressive business nature, we could still keep the encoding (and some friends in foreign places) and everyone would probably be able to get along a little easier when stuff like this went on. We probably have stepped over (or are about to) some invisible line into corporate nightmare world, but the pendulum swings both ways and will eventually swing back. Just not while Herr Bush is in office.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  76. honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I¦personally¦think¦regional¦locked¦items¦is¦more¦w orse¦then¦better..¦I¦mean,¦i¦go¦to¦another¦country ¦for¦example,¦see¦a¦totally¦cool¦DVD¦that¦I¦want,¦ but¦dont¦pick¦it¦up¦cause¦my¦'regional'¦player¦at¦ home¦wont¦play¦it..¦hrm¦...¦is¦this¦helping¦or¦hur ting¦media¦giants...?¦¦i¦think¦regional¦stuff¦is¦c rapp,¦who¦cares?

  77. Some one needs to say it by mfos.org · · Score: 1

    Now that's just stupid.

  78. I agree. however it would be nice by Sorcerer13 · · Score: 1

    While I agree that this is the reason why Japanese controllers are not being allowed to be used on US consoles, it sure would have been nice to use the smaller Japanese controller.

  79. Yipeeeeee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Jap controllers ? Does that means we won't be seeing the Little school girl ass spanking simulator, or the USB Tentacle rape device in EB any time soon ? : (

  80. This story is nonsense by Lurks · · Score: 1
    We were puzzled to see this story on NCSE, a normally on-the-money news site.

    It's worth pointing out that out of all the XBox developers in the UK that I have visited (and that's a lot), every single one I saw uses Japanese controllers. The stock controllers are universally despised. Not only that, the certification process through Microsoft demands that the games work on these controllers and are tested as that.

    We're all very puzzled how this utter nonsense story got out there and how NCSE picked it up. It just simply isn't true in any way shape or form. One developer I know even confirmed it with XBox developer support who said;

    That is definitely not true :) I have been using that controller for about 6 months!!!!

    This controller appears as a gamepad, just as the us controller, and if you look at our gamepad sample in the XDK, we provision for it's subtype, so we recognize it, as we would any controller.

    We also check for this functionality with ALL games passing through certification.

    Does that ease your concerns!???

    End of story.
  81. So if you can't stand competition... by TicTacTux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then switch over to protectionism.
    Seems that nowadays this is the only method of keeping competitors out of reach.
    In the good ole times there were the innovators and inventors on the helm. Now all we can see is shivering apparatchiks. Sigh. I thought we went over this already with DVD regions.

    --
    Use The Source, Luke!
  82. They work for me by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 1

    Granted, they're pre-release dev japanese gamepads, but I've been using them on my retail US Xbox since November...

  83. Further Confirmation by fondue · · Score: 1
    I'm going to keep it brief because the Xbox is now toast, history, garbage, 3DO, yesterday's news, anyway.

    This was rumoured for ages even before the xbox was released. Only certain vendors will be able to make peripherals work with certain Xboxes. You can imagine that third parties wanting to sell a keyboard or mouse for the xbox will be screwed by this. After all, if you put a mouse and keyboard on an xbox, then you can put a web browser on it. And oh shit, looks like Mr. & Mrs. Joe Middle America's Windows PC is gathering dust.

    When will people get it that the xbox doesn't deserve our money, or even for us to lend it credibility. It's not a console, it's just an electrified games industry consumer and publisher reaming machine.

    If it wasn't for the Flash Linker business, I'd now say 'Buy a Gamecube'. Hell, seeing as only the games matter I'll say it anyway. Buy a Gamecube.

    --

    Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

    1. Re:Further Confirmation by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      You weren't brief, you were a mindless stupid jackass anti-Microsoft bigot. Read the facts before going off half cocked like a fucking moron.

  84. What about the DVD playback dongle? by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
    Here's a question: How does the DVD playback dongle do its region checking? Is it based on the country ID in the Xbox itself, or is it stored in the dongle's software? Would this USB region checking prevent it from working at all?

    I'm just wondering what would happen if you took a Japanese DVD playback dongle & plugged it into a US Xbox (or vice versa) - would it playback US DVDs, Japanese DVDs, or not work at all?

    I'm particularly concerned about regions as I'm a Canadian resident & Xbox owner who's planning to move back to Australia sometime (and I'd kinda like to keep my Xbox)...

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:What about the DVD playback dongle? by kindbud · · Score: 2

      I'm a Canadian resident & Xbox owner who's planning to move back to Australia sometime (and I'd kinda like to keep my Xbox)...

      Interpol will be along shortly to collect your person. Please try to be presentable.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  85. regioning by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    ok, at least when they region encoded DVDs there was some semblance of a reason. what reason is there for this other than to squeeze nickles? And how many people import controllers anyway? is the market the gargantuan to warrant this? have corporations (not just MS) all collectively shoved their heads up their asses? jesus. anyone else in favor of rising up and just revolting against the corporations? screw revolting against the government lets jsut get rid of the corps and start again.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  86. Kitty die die die! by chiph · · Score: 0

    I'm sure it's nothing more than to keep the "Hello Kitty" branded controllers out of the US.

  87. Try again. Get your facts straight /. by Jayde+Stargunner · · Score: 2

    The Xbox has no hardware-based region locking (aside from DVD) AT ALL. Zippo. You can import games and plop them in without a mod chip or anything.

    This is a SOFTWARE thing. Certain developers/publishers can, if they so choose, employ region locking strategies. This is an OPTION and completely up to the developer/publisher.

    It's developers and publishers (especially publishers since the US and JP publishers are almost never the same entity) and lose money off of importing, NOT Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo. Microsoft doesn't give a crap about importing, but some developers may. THEY are the ones who have employed region lockouts in their software.

    This is very similar to what Squaresoft did with games such as Dino Crisis and Final Fantasy VIII--which had built-in mod-chip detection and wouldn't let you play the game in a modded system. (Of course, people figured out a way to circumvent it with Gameshark/Pro Action Replay...but that's hardly the point)

    I know /. is ready to leap at anything realted to the possible "monopolistic" business practices of Microsoft, but this is absurd. Do a little research. This is becoming nothing more than an anti-M$ World Weekly News. =P

    -Jayde

    --
    What's a sig?
    1. Re:Try again. Get your facts straight /. by Argyle+of+Sock · · Score: 1

      This is incorrect. This is what Microsoft proposed well before launch, but apparently pressure from the publishers caused them to change their mind.

      The Xbox now has a country lockout similar to what the other manufacturers have implemented. I'd post the link to the Xbox FAQ on the MS site but I can't find it at the moment (it also says that Japanese controllers will work on the US Xbox)...maybe someone else can find it...

  88. Deserved Criticism by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


    If Linux did the same sort of thing to MS, people would laud Linux for taking a stand against MS.

    ...

    No matter what your take on MS, remember, they are a business, and it MAKES BUSINESS sense for them to do this.


    One of the apparent cornerstones of the community that seems to frequent this forum is functionality. Part of the definition of functionality is the ability to make diverse platforms / technologies interface. Anything that interferes with the ability to interface components is "evil".


    Sometimes the interference is poor system design. Sometimes it is proprietary technology. And sometimes the technology that interferes with functionality is a marketing strategy.


    Enter Microsoft.


    We all know Microsoft is a technology company. But it seems to escape a lot of people's realization that they are a technology company who excels at marketing. It is their marketing, and not their technology, that makes them a leader.


    A key part of Microsoft's marketing strategy is forced incompatability in their products. And in this community, that makes them "evil".


    To be sure - anybody who uses the same strategy will be viewed unfavorably. Even companies who base their products on Linux.


    Of course, Microsoft has a very long history of consistantly "evil" behavior. There is a good reason this community distrusts them. And they have deserved that distrust and criticism.


    Sure - businesses should make money. But here's a novel concept - make money by making a good product. Use marketing as a tool to make sure people get to hear about your product and its advantages. And sure, this may sound very quaint to the Microsoft appologist / fan. But then, the free market concept has been around for a long time.

  89. Both Sides of the Pond by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

    IIRC, "both sides of the pond" refers to the US and Europe - specifically, jolly old England. This would be due to the fact that 'the pond' is the Atlantic Ocean, not the Pacific. I don't know whta context you'd use for the Pacific. I'd htink something along the lines of "on the other side of the world".

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  90. Re: Moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning about the fake fake warning that the update was fake. The update was fake, this fake waning is real.

  91. The main reason this is being done.. by dohnut · · Score: 1


    ..is probably to help protect Japanese retailers.

    Like music CDs, it's probably cheaper to buy the (American) import than it is to buy from a local retailer in Japan. To help the Japanese retailers, most producers of media in Japan try to encourage buying locally. In the case of music CDs, they usually add extra tracks to the Japanese release to entice buyers, here they are forcing you to buy locally -- using a technique similar to that of regional encoding on DVDs.

    I'm not saying it's a good thing, but it's not as evil as people think..

    --
    Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
  92. Reverse engineering is LEGAL under the DMCA by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    The UID is proprietary information (similar to a password) and reverse engeneering it is against the law according to the DMCA.

    Hold it. The letter of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act specifically permits acts of circumvention that are part of legitimate reverse-engineering for interoperability. From 17 USC 1201(f)(2):

    Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b), a person may develop and employ technological means to circumvent a technological measure, or to circumvent protection afforded by a technological measure, in order to enable the identification and analysis under paragraph (1), or for the purpose of enabling interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, if such means are necessary to achieve such interoperability, to the extent that doing so does not constitute infringement under this title.

    Judge Kaplan made an idiotic mistake in completely ignoring this paragraph.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  93. Excellent! by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

    This is good news... this is one more reason to boycott XBox and Microsoft.

    Of course, I will never purchase a Xbox anyway, so this won't really affect me. If I ever won a Xbox, say, from Taco Bell, I would probably sell it and get a Gamecube instead (I already have a PS2.)

    1. Re:Excellent! by filmcritic · · Score: 0

      Then sit down and shut your god-damned fucking mouth. You don't have an Xbox so go fuck your daughter instead. You really had to add your mindless, idiotic 2 cents didn't you?

  94. No, Pond = Atlantic, Lake = Pacific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original poster is right, the use of "Pond" in this context is incorrect. The term originates *because* the Atlantic is so much smaller than the Pacific. Japan isn't on the other side of the Pond from the U.S., it's on the other side of the Lake.

  95. OK, so how again are GBA flash cards illegal? by yerricde · · Score: 2

    GBA flash cards are considered illegal

    How are GBA flash cards any more illegal than SmartMedia or CompactFlash cards?. If I load only free software onto a Visoly flash card for Game Boy Advance, whose copyright am I infringing? Yes, free software for GBA does exist, and copying the Nintendo boot logo is legal under Sega v. Accolade. (Read More...)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  96. Is "Press Start" an access control device? by yerricde · · Score: 2

    In any case, I don't think such a device would be allowing any access to copyrighted material, so the DMCA wouldn't apply.

    <sarcasm>
    Microsoft, with its effectively limitless legal defense fund, may be able to buy off a judge enough to convince him that the requirement to "Press Start" makes the controller an effective access control mechanism under the DMCA.
    </sarcasm>

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  97. Windows XB is a very stripped-down Win2K by yerricde · · Score: 1

    However, they are using a version of its monopoly OS inside this console.

    It's a stripped-down Windows 2000 kernel (24 KB instead of 1 MB) with DirectX on top of it. There's no Internet Explorer on the XBox version of Win2K; can the states use this to establish that IE isn't necessary for Windows?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  98. Re: Moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moderator was moderating the orignal warning and the warning about the fake fake warning with fake moderating points, eliminating any problems.

  99. Lik Sang still ships to US through EMS Speedpost by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I'm in Australia so Lik-Sang can still get stuff through to here

    I ordered a GBA flash memory card and linker (for legit home development if you're curious; my GBA page is here) from Lik Sang and had it shipped EMS Speedpost (as opposed to UPS), and it arrived just fine. The problem is with UPS's over-restrictive customs policy.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  100. Importing is bad by boxcarjoe · · Score: 1

    we should be glad that imported controllers wont work with the xbox, that leaves more money in the states to help the economy. the us has a bad trade balance, maybe this will help us.

  101. Hopes for the future. by KhanReaper · · Score: 1

    Great, I hope I don't see region locked computer components in my lifetime.

    --
    Even the Politburo concurs with Process of Elimination http://process-of-elimination.net
  102. Probably this point has already been made, but... by HKTiger · · Score: 1
    ...does it seem as though the same group of people who are in favour of (indeed, generated) region-coding (to prevent cheap products from poor nations being sold in rich nations and undercutting the huge corp-rat profits), are also the ones who make use of the cheap wages and crap working conditions in poor nations to increase their margin and increase the aforementioned profits?

    I mean, really, if the producers are entitled to take advantage of the disparity to engorge their profits, why should it be considered so heinous for the consumers to take advantage of the disparity to engorge their DVD collection? Not that I'm in favour of a lot of corporate dealings, but there's the tiniest of incosistencies there.

    Or is it because corp-rats are intrinsically better people than consumers? Hmmm, that must be it...

  103. Oh, goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've made machines that are smart enough to be snobbish.

  104. Poor Little Johnny by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

    (Dad): Happy birthday little Johnny, I got you that Xbox you wanted so bad.
    (LJ): Gee, thanks dad! You're the best!
    (Dad): I had to go up north to Canada to get the Xbox, but I was lucky enough to find the controllers right here in Seattle.

    Later that night...

    (Dad): What the !&#* do you mean it doesn't work?? After I spent over $400 on it and it doesn't even work?

    To be continued...

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  105. Horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is utter rubbish - I'm an xbox developer (programmer) and I can tell you I've not heard anything about this supposed region coding of peripherals - and I write our joypad code. I use a US xbox with a Japanese pad every day (I prefer them over the US ones) without any problems.


    Really... all this hype and no-one from the site had even tested the claims.

  106. Re:Why oh Why? I'll tell you. by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

    I love it when everyone pretends they're a business major. Because you know, Microsoft is stupid and didn't realize they would make more money if they listened to you.

    Microsoft does not incur loss on sales of all hardware. The console itself they may take a loss on, but that does not include peripherals and accessories. If MadCatz can sell Xbox controllers for $30 and make money, don't you think MS is making money on their extra controller for $40, with their better manufacturing processes? Of course they are.

    So "no valid reasons", let's summarize:
    1) Region locking is acceptable business practice with most internal media companies.

    2) Every console manufacturer ever has charged licensing fees from 3rd parties. Everyone on this thread who is blaming MS and saying they're trying to get a "lock" on Xbox hardware. Stop and realize how ridiculous you're sounding - it's a Microsoft console, they can control whatever they want, just like Nintendo and Sony do.

    3) Cheap companies make cheap products, and as bad as it sounds, licensing is one way to control that your image will not get diluted from faulty accessories. Otherwise you could buy your memory cards at $1 stores that would fry your system.

    If you look, the current market has plenty of 3rd party accessories for Xbox already, with plenty more to come. Driving wheels, controllers, and probably light guns soon, all reasonably priced. Let's not rush to bash MS (too late here) when they're following in the footsteps of other consoles, and creating a great product.

    --
    Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  107. Re:Probably this point has already been made, but. by swb · · Score: 2

    You make the best point. Corporate America (and it may apply to European countries, but I see most glaringly in the US) has a real love economic double standards. Another example: They *want* restrictions and high tarrifs on products they can't compete on. They *don't* want restrictions on the importation of labor, because it cuts their costs. I often wonder if maybe capitalism isn't a huge, very long running ponzi scheme that requires the continuous shifting of labor and materials costs to cheaper and cheaper countries in order to keep the payouts working and higher and higher prices paid in the "expensive" countries to offset the decreasing savings of production shifts. I just wonder if/when it will break.

  108. Why is this story here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the story is completely false then. So why is it still here? Just to foster some MS bashing I guess. You'd think if the mods were remotely responsible they would pull this off the site since it is totally incorrect. Do any of you even pay attention when the story has something to do with Microsoft?

    I wonder if they'll accept my news submission of "Slashdot secretly run by Bill Gates"? I know its not true, but I guess that doesn't matter.

    Good job guys. Keep up the thoughtless MS bashing.

  109. Re:Probably this point has already been made, but. by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    why should it be considered so heinous for the consumers to take advantage of the disparity to engorge their DVD collection

    Well, one could argue on the grounds that two wrongs do not make a right. If we're speaking strictly of DVD production, where are most of the DVD copies produced and what are the conditions?

    I see a lot of the cheap knock-offs and bootlegs as an attempt by foreign merchants to cash in because of lax laws or enforcement. A large part of it can may also be attributed to a different view of property rights than we have here in the US.

    I mean where else would there be a law that classed pliers as an illegal weapon because they could be used to cut fences? We're pretty aggressive about our property rights - I'm pretty sure it's still legal in my state to shoot trespassers as long as it's posted. This would probably horrify the people of most other countries.

    I won't argue that corporations are any better than people. In theory, they're supposed to be the same for certain purposes. And yes, they can get depersonalized in the pursuit of a buck and forget that there are real people out there with real problems.

    That still doesn't make it right to try and screw over a company. On the other hand, it's not right for a company to try and screw over the people.

    But, from the standpoint of a corporation, the rules in foreign countries are already in place (ie., lower wages, lower cost of living). Why shouldn't they be allowed to play by those rules? If you don't like the rules, change them. For instance, what's to prevent a country from having two minimum wages - one for locally owned business, and one for foreign business? Or perhaps higher taxes for foreign business with the proceeds going to public works?

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  110. But with reference to DVD region-coding... by HKTiger · · Score: 1
    ...that's not screwing over anyone: that's just those who have power and money trying to circumvent fair competition to ensure they continue to make their profits, while at the same time denying consumers in their region access to products produced outside their region. It's not illegal to buy region X DVDs if you live in region Y, nor is it illegal to play them (all you need is a region X player, setting aside the question of modding for a moment). But if you want region X DVDs, you can't play them on your region Y player (without mods): why? Simply to guarantee the region Y producers don't have to compete equally with the region X producers.

    Remember that I'm *not* talking about copies, legal or illegal: I'm talking solely about legitimate DVDs produced in another region. Totally within everyone's rules, and even within everyone's ethics (as taking advantage of sweatshop labour is *not*). Everyone's ethics, that is, except for the region Y corporations...

    1. Re:But with reference to DVD region-coding... by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      You seem to view this as a matter of oppression by corporation (or something similar). So let's look at a hypothetical example, so that I may clarify my point.

      You own a company: HKTiger Widgets. HKTW manufactures and sells widgets in multiple markets, the USA and Indonesia. Now, Indonesia has lower wages, lower cost of living, etc., and everything is just generally cheaper. In order to sell your widgets in Indonesia, you have to set a price that the Indonesian market will bear, say $1.40USD equivalent. The US market will bear a much higher price, say $5.00 per widget.

      Now, you need some way of keeping the $1.40 widgets from being imported to the US, because you'll be losing $3.60 profit on every HKTiger Widget shipped back into the US. Even if the production price is only 80 cents, that leaves you a margin of 60 cents at the minimum and $4.20 at the maximum.

      Now, fine if you can continue to produce widgets at a margin of 60 cents, but it does not allow your company to grow as fast as at the $4.20 price. If your primary stockholders are in the US, then they are going to prefer a faster growth company (the $4.20 margin) over a slower growth company. So you devise a way to keep the $1.40 widgets out of the $5.00 market and thus attract stockholders.

      Thus, region encoding is born. The Indonesian widgets (produced by your company) are keyed to work only in Indonesian machines, thus preventing the importation into a market that can bear the higher price. The US widgets are keyed to work in US machines because it's easier to create one standard and just change a number or two than to create a batch with and a batch without the region coding.

      All of this is done because, as a whole, the US market can bear a higher price for your company's widget. It's not reasonable to expect a company to go to each and every consumer and ask what you can afford. So you set a price that the largest percentage of your target market can afford and hope it works. You may adjust up and down a little bit as the market changes, but overall the price will be higher in the US than Indonesia.

      I understand this and that's why I don't argue with region encoding too much. The only time it really bugs me is when I hear about a good foreign movie and can't get it here because there's not a US-region encoded version.

      These are the compromises for living in a capitalist society. Take it for what you will.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  111. Microsoft scores! by KDENCE · · Score: 1

    Hey, this seems to make sense to me somehow. Let me think, if I were to make a product and it happened to achieve world fame or demand, can I make the decision that my product can be sold in certain matter and chose how it is sold? I think so, that is the beauty of a free country, yes we have certain freedoms as a consumer; but microsoft also has certain freedoms as a maufacturer or inventor. Question? Who the heck is wanting a Japanese joystick anyway? Buy USA baby!

  112. This is not true. I own an xbox and use the Jap pad. (It was hard to give in to M$, but I feel it is a nice machine)

  113. Wow... by rweir · · Score: 1

    Is anyone actually surprised? MS has just found a way to increase short term revenues, to the detriment of eceryone but them; certainly a rarity in the modern Western world.