Slashdot Mirror


The Incredible Shrinking Motherboard

DrGonzo was among several who submitted news of the new Mini Motherboard from via. The Mini ITX standard is just 170mm squared, and this motherboard has audio, ether, IDE, video and tv out. Not bad for something so tiny. Here's an article about the small wonder.

307 comments

  1. Re:April 9th, 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you know something?

    i know you're probably a troll, but please explain what you meant

  2. Cheap book PCs? by pro-mpd · · Score: 1

    I know I wouldn't mind having a dozen or so cheap Cappuccino-type knockoffs... building in quantity would probably make them a lot cheaper than the $300+ for an industrial SBC. In-dash MP3 player, anyone?

    1. Re:Cheap book PCs? by bliss · · Score: 1

      "I know I wouldn't mind having a dozen or so cheap Cappuccino-type knockoffs... building in quantity would probably make them a lot cheaper than the $300+ for an industrial SBC. In-dash MP3 player, anyone?"

      what is an SBC?

      --
      The death of one man is a tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic --Joseph Stalin
    2. Re:Cheap book PCs? by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      single board computer

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    3. Re:Cheap book PCs? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Informative
      Small doesn't always translate to cheap, as a matter of experience it's the opposite. You can get a lot of current mobos for <$100

      For more about form factors, here the definitive site.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Cheap book PCs? by phallen · · Score: 1

      I totally agree; in fact the small form-factor seems to have a "gadget effect" that bumps up the price. I was really surprised at how expensive the Espresso computers were.

      But, I will say that I would love an Espresso-sized computer that could plug into my KVM setup. I reciently converted an older machine (AMD 333mhz Emachines) into a Linux box and and plan to use it for my web server, blah blah blah... but the thing is louder than hell and takes up a lot of space.

      I would much rather have a Linux-server-stuffed-behind-my-couch form-factor, but I'm not willing to pay for it.

      --
      If Slashdot is where the spelling-challenged go when they die, I'm in heaven.
    5. Re:Cheap book PCs? by Link-chan · · Score: 1

      Computers with this board will be great for LAN parties!

    6. Re:Cheap book PCs? by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 2

      You can get a lot of current mobos for under $100

      Yes you can get a current mobo for $100, but this includes the processor, which on a standard mobo would be another $100, putting it's total cost at $200.

      I for one and looking to buy one as soon as they come out, perfect for a linux router/server if you ask me.

    7. Re:Cheap book PCs? by Com2Kid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude, this includes Proccessor NIC and Video Card.

      Hell, for a $50 case + PS combo (ok likely A LOT more expensive for a limited market like this product) and a $30 wirelss Keyboard Mouse combo from A4Tech I would be set.

      Oooh yaaah.

      Hehe, it already comes with TV out too.

      INSANLY cool.

      I am thinking Digital VCR here folks. :) Especialy if you outfit it with some sort of hot swappable IDE Hard Drive system, LOL!

      Hehe, actualy with Flash Memory cards approuching (at as I recall) 1GigaByte now days, hmm, hehe! The MoBo has build in compatability with Flash Memory from what I can tell, LOL! Though some sort of internal mount USB unit could be used as well with a port for the Flash memory to fit into.

      Hehe!!!!! Digital VCR! MPEG4 video, w00t w00t! :)

      Man that would rock, though using Flash Memory would compleatly negate any sort of cost savings, LOL!

      Still be pretty nice to have a 120GB or so drive installed in this baby and use it to go around with your movie collection sitting in something that you can almost carry in a small backpack, LOL!

  3. I just had to... by ryepup · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these babies! It'd fit in your CD rack.

    1. Re:I just had to... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      It'd fit in your CD rack.

      Perfect for that beowulf cluster you'll need to crack CD copy protection...

      But, how about on your set-top box? Seems a good fit.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. White Paper by the_radix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Also on Via's site, the white paper describing this small wonder:

    http://www.via.com.tw/en/VInternet/Mini-iTX.PDF

    --
    This .sig is either false or a paradox.
    1. Re:White Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, i was trolling the -1s and found this one really funny... are there no moderators who can appreciate bad 80s TV humor... especially when it's on topic? (small wonder being the last two words in the article)

  5. Uh, it's not that small by apsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not 170 mm^2 but 170 mm X 170 mm, which is 17 cm x 17 cm, or a square about 6.5 inches on a side. Why is it people see "mm" and think small? Anyway as the article says, there are smaller ones out there...

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

    1. Re:Uh, it's not that small by wiredog · · Score: 2

      Still, compared to the average motherboard, it's pretty small. Not quite PC104, but close. Certainly useable in lots of embedded applications.

    2. Re:Uh, it's not that small by Guignol · · Score: 1

      The headline says 170mm squared
      that's not 170mm^2, but (170 mm) squared :)

    3. Re:Uh, it's not that small by mhyclak · · Score: 1

      Getting closer to home-built mp3/ogg players!

    4. Re:Uh, it's not that small by podom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There are smaller ones out there, but if I'm not mistaken, this board is designed to be compatible with standard ATX cases. I haven't actually used the board, but it looks to have

      (1) standard ATX locations for I/O ports,
      (2) standard spacing for its (one) PCI slots (so it could be used with the standard first cutout on an ATX case), and
      (3) standard mounting holes (of course, there are less of them).

      So, when they say its the smallest form factor, they don't mean its the smallest PC. There are many much smaller embedded X86 machines, internet appliances, etc. I think they mean it's the smallest "standard" form factor motherboard.

      Phil

      --
      We're wanted men. I have the death sentence in 12 systems!
    5. Re:Uh, it's not that small by kontos · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Umm... doesn't
      170^2 = 170*170
      ???

      --
      SM MBL-VIR looking 4 SIG 4 LTR. must be DDF, no 420, SD ok.
    6. Re:Uh, it's not that small by remou · · Score: 0, Redundant

      did ya read a bit too fast, didn't ya!

      it's written:
      170mm squared!!!!

      not 170mm^2, or 170square-mm

      so I think it is correct

    7. Re:Uh, it's not that small by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      It's not 170 mm^2 but 170 mm X 170 mm

      geez man, 170 mm X 170 mm IS 170mm

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    8. Re:Uh, it's not that small by netringer · · Score: 2, Informative
      geez man, 170 mm X 170 mm IS 170mm
      No it's not. It's 170^2 mm^2 = 28900 mm^2

      4 tiles up by 4 tiles wide is 16 tiles, not 4.

      170 mm length by 170 mm width is 28900 square mm.

      Anyway the original posting says 170mm square, which is correct, not 170 square mm.

      enuf.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    9. Re:Uh, it's not that small by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      170mm squared is exactly that - 170mm x 170mm. It is a description of how to get the area of the surface.

      170 square units (units being mm in this case) is distinctly different. It is a measurement of area.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    10. Re:Uh, it's not that small by Team+Vogon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's not 170 mm^2 but 170 mm X 170 mm

      geez man, 170 mm X 170 mm IS 170mm


      When I type 170 x 170 into my calculator I get 28900. That would be 28900mm^2.

      --
      -I'll hang up and listen...
    11. Re:Uh, it's not that small by Drakin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Actually no. if the board measures 170mm by 170 mm that means it's 28900 mm. 170mm ould give you a shape that's oh... just over 13mm (bit over half an inch) on a side.

      Remember, area(mm) = length(mm) * width(mm)

    12. Re:Uh, it's not that small by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's about the same size as the motherboard in the Powermac 5400 from way back in 1996. The only problem with that was the lack of expandability.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    13. Re:Uh, it's not that small by bhsx · · Score: 1

      actually, it says it correctly... you were thinking of 170 "square mm" when actually it states that it's 170 "mm squared." The article is correct.

      --
      put the what in the where?
    14. Re:Uh, it's not that small by bhsx · · Score: 1

      you sir, are an idiot. 28900mm^2 would be 83,521,000 "square mm"

      --
      put the what in the where?
    15. Re:Uh, it's not that small by LordLava · · Score: 1

      open high school math book...
      170mm^2 would need side of (and this is assuming a perfect square as there are obviously an infinite # of combinations that would solve this)13.03mm (approx: really its 170^.5).

    16. Re:Uh, it's not that small by Team+Vogon · · Score: 0

      No sir, you are an idiot.

      XXXXXXX mm^2 is a unit of measure, that measure being area, not a mathmatical term of squaring a number. In my world 'square mm' is the same as mm^2.

      Did you even read my post? Let's do a math problem. 170 x 170 = 28900. With me so far? Ok lets say it is 170 mm X 170 mm ( length X height, still with me?) = 28900 mm^2 or 28900 square mm. Make sense, or do you need to take geometry again?

      --
      -I'll hang up and listen...
  6. cebit by RobertTaylor · · Score: 0

    Now why dont Nokia stick one of these in a phone and make a 'phone' that can play halflife not java games!

    1. Re:cebit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That phone would be like, 7 inches on a side, and an inch thick.

      Whatever turns you on.

  7. Re:April 9th, 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll, please ignore

  8. What I want to know is... by belg4mit · · Score: 0

    Why the hell are the images in zip files?

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
    1. Re:What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you why...the overwhelming compression ratio!!!

      >ls -aol Mini*
      -rw-rw-rw- 1 me me 1594418 Nov 6 15:44 MiniITX layout_H.jpg
      -rw-r--r-- 1 me me 1593167 Mar 13 13:08 MiniITXlayout_H.zip

      The zip file is a miniscule 99.922% of the size of the original. Don't you feel dumb!!!

    2. Re:What I want to know is... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose it is one way
      to cope with a /.-ing. How many
      people are actually going to
      bother downloading a zip file vs.
      viewing a JPEG? Still stupid as
      hell if you ask me.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  9. Good form factor for... by Onionesque · · Score: 1, Funny

    Autonomous, robotic, self-hiding matzoh for Passover.

  10. Re:April 9th, 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe terrorists are using slashdot to secretly communicate.

    Better call ashcroft. I say we send peacekeepers to bomb VA Linux into the stone age, and declare a national terror warning on the 9th of april. Just in case.

  11. Sweet by baptiste · · Score: 2
    It'll be nice to see if they stick this in teh SpaceWalker aluminum case - but I wonder why they only went up to 800MHz when the C3 goes to 933 (though I've had a tough time finding them)

    But this is one sweet little box - toss a second NIC in - instant firewall! Very cool.

    1. Re:Sweet by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Why? The SV-24 can already hold a motherboard that handles faster chips.

      Better would be an even smaller case, for people who don't need even the one PCI slot.

    2. Re:Sweet by baptiste · · Score: 2

      I wasn't saying put this into the SV-24, but into a case like it, but smalle r(my original post wasn't all that clear looking back) What would really be nice is a Spacewalker case about half as high and not as deep. Just deep enough for a floppy in front with HD sideways in back above this mobo and space for one PCI mounted in a riserboard sideways. Net install LInux and wheee!

    3. Re:Sweet by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      I was researching the Eden platform stuff before this announcement - the original specs were for 533mhz CPUs. Basically the difference is that these CPUs are supposedly tested at higher temperatures and guaranteed to run without a fan. Also note that under Linux with the right software the multiplier can be completely unlocked on the C3 series and changed in software.

    4. Re:Sweet by gid · · Score: 1

      The problem with the SV24 is that it sounds like a jet airplane in my bedroom. A c3 (instead of 1ghz celeron) would have helped, but when playing divx movies and the like under linux, you need all the horsepower you can get. One of these days I'll figure a way to hack a quieter case/cpu/psu fan into. psu fan might be scary to replace, but unfortunately, it's the noisiest fan of the bunch.

    5. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SV24 isn't getting smaller. It's getting bigger. Shuttle is going to introduce updated versions of their minibox called the SS40 and SS50. The cases will be slightly bigger by about 1-2 cm per side. The SS40 will support socket A (for AMD chips) and the SS50 will support socket 478 for Intel P4's. The boards will have 2 PCI slots instead of the SV24's one. It'll have a SiS chipset on the mobo, DDR RAM support, improved graphics, 5.1 channel audio, LAN, USB, FW, and S-Video.

    6. Re:Sweet by baptiste · · Score: 2
      The problem with the SV24 is that it sounds like a jet airplane in my bedroom

      The SV24 is louder than you'd expect. And from what I found with mine - its the damn 1" fan in the power supply which is right behind teh vent holes in the front of the case. The fan in back is slow and quiet as is the CPU fan that came with the low profile heatsink. I've been temped to take the power supply apart (unplugged of course) and replace that 1" fan. 1" fans tend to be noisy but there are some quieter ones.

    7. Re:Sweet by HalfFlat · · Score: 2

      I can second the PS fan noise is the problem!

      It's a 40mm x 40mm x 10mm 12VDC fan. I'm in the process of replacing it with a 5V Microcomp fan (MCKD0504PEB3-8) which is rated at 16dBA. It has
      about half the airflow, but I'm hoping it will
      still be sufficient.

      For more information, or to see what others have done, have a look at the informative comment thread on the SV24 article at the Tech Report.

    8. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be that would jack up the power requirement, cooling as well as the cost... A lower cooling & power requirement would translate to higher MTBF which is what you want.

      Don't forget raw processor speed is not the only deciding factor in embedded environment.

  12. Slowing down already... ./ effect by Indras · · Score: 1

    Link to the Google cache of this page.

    --
    The speed of time is one second per second.
  13. Almost what I want.... by billmaly · · Score: 2

    I'm still waiting for a small (Micro ATX or smaller) mobo that will allow for a REAL chip (P4/Athlon), 512MB RAM, ATA 100 HD, CD, ethernet, USB, AND support for AGP graphics. I want this for portable gaming and haven't found the IDEAL board...yet! Still looking....any suggestions?

    1. Re:Almost what I want.... by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

      Shuttle are bringing out the successors to the sv24 - one for P4s and the other for Athlons. Not sure when they are actually appearing - but it will take them 6 months to appear in the UK anyway :(

    2. Re:Almost what I want.... by augustz · · Score: 1

      Looking for a MicroATX mobo that does the above, along with a MicroATX case that doesn't have three inches of plastic sticking off the front.

    3. Re:Almost what I want.... by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Why do you need ATA-100 for gaming? Games don't access the hard drive all that much, unless you're low on RAM and your peecee is swapping memory. Current IDE HDD's can only sustain 40-50MB/sec transfer anyway, and even bursting I don't think they get close to 100mb/sec.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    4. Re:Almost what I want.... by Indras · · Score: 1

      Not sure when they are actually appearing

      April 1st. I've already got a dealer set up to deliver one of the Athlon boards upon release.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    5. Re:Almost what I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about loading the game and/or switching levels.

    6. Re:Almost what I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want portable gaming, then no matter how small that motherboard is, a P4/Athlon will be inappropriate. They both require lots of cooling, which translates into huge heat sink/fan combos for air, and heavy tubing/pumps/heat exchangers for water cooling. Such cooling mechanisms will require lots of space and will increase the weight significantly.

      I'm surprised no one thought about this. That must be one reason VIA's board used a C3 (which can run without active cooling?). Either learn to run quake at 40 fps (vs 80 or whatever the latest machines can do) or just drop the idea or portability.

    7. Re:Almost what I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      want this for portable gaming and haven't found the IDEAL board...yet!


      Jesus christ, get a fucking game boy. Its smaller and cheaper than any of this stuff. You think people make computers just for games? Maybe some niche companies do, but look at all the high-end consumer video card OEMs going out of business. Meanwhile 90% of people don't notice the fact that the new dell they got uses the onboard sound and video.
    8. Re:Almost what I want.... by N8w8 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, apart from speed, ATA100 is also needed for HDDs bigger than 137GB.

    9. Re:Almost what I want.... by lgsracer · · Score: 1

      Check out the Jetway S450L http://www.jetway.com.tw/evisn/product/p-4/S450/s4 50.htm

    10. Re:Almost what I want.... by lgsracer · · Score: 1

      For a Athlon rig check out the Asus A7V266-M http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7v266-m/overview.h tm

  14. Only one PCI slot by shlong · · Score: 1

    Only one PCI slot makes it less interesting as a desktop motherboard, and it certainly is not meant as a server motherboard. It does, however, look promising in the appliance area.

    --
    Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
    1. Re:Only one PCI slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be cool if there is a way of putting in a good video card with both tuner & Video In (not just restricted to the onboard video out only). This is what I need for that multimedia box before SSSCA kills it.

      PCI video is too much money (low volume) for old hardware.

  15. The site: by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Informative

    is coming down hard... (offer up temporary local mirrors for subscribers and I might bite, it'd also sit well with the people who get taken out from a /.ing)

    link to google's cached version

    and the text from from theregus.com:

    VIA Technologies is expected to launch a very small format motherboard this month. Called the mini-ITX, the fully integrated mobo measures up at 170mm x170mm (yes, it's square), making 50 per cent smaller than the FlexATX form factor, VIA claims.

    The Mini-ITX is supplied with an 800MHz Eden x.86 C3 processor (in EBGA packaging), incorporating 128K L1 and 64K L2 cache; integrated AGP2 graphics 2X; PC100/133 SDRAM support etc. You can check out more spec here.

    The board will retail for around $100, and gets its first mainstream outing at CeBIT this week.

    The Mini ITX is targeted at the embedded market - expect most units to disappear into printer routers and the like; but VIA is also reporting 'grassroots interest' in the product from home PC and commercial system builders.

    The Mini-ITX may be small, but it is not 40 per cent smaller than any other form factor around, as VIA believes. The Danish firm, maker of the M-Series PC, deploys a 157mm x146mm mobo. ®

    1. Re:The site: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha.

      It brightens my day every time I see slashdot post a link to a URL ending in ".jsp"

      It never takes more than a few minutes to go down for the count.

    2. Re:The site: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. It was only seconds this time.
      Only 6 posts and the app server was mangled.

    3. Re:The site: by Jac_no_k · · Score: 1

      Mirror of the one page here


    4. Re:The site: by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is obvious but does the $100 include the processor or not?

      If not what does an 800MHz ~cost?

    5. Re:The site: by mitheral · · Score: 1

      It must, the cpu is solder on the motherboard.

  16. It's stronger than me... by juliao · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry if I have to point it out, but...
    170 mm * 170 mm is NOT 170 mm^2
    This motherboard is 28900 mm^2, or 289 cm^2.
    Still a nice little board, at that :)

    1. Re:It's stronger than me... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      For those who hail from America, that's about 6.7in by 6.7in

      ;)

    2. Re:It's stronger than me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see the size of the average amercian wong has finnaly become a standard in measurement. 3940 wongs an hour baby!!!

    3. Re:It's stronger than me... by bhsx · · Score: 1

      The moderators need to learn MathML... all these posts marked 'Informative' are anything but. :)

      --
      put the what in the where?
  17. Not very hackable/expandable by OnceWas · · Score: 1

    There's only one PCI slot - with support for two cards (via a riser?). No AGP. A semi-custom CPU. Not very expandable. What kind of upgrade path will this thing have?

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey-boy.
    1. Re:Not very hackable/expandable by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      What kind of upgrade path does any computer have that you didn't build yourself(or a friend).

      Anyway upgrade paths always go the route of the motherboard. If this is a standard then you should be able to buy a new one. Of course with this thing buying a new motherboard is buying a new system.

    2. Re:Not very hackable/expandable by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Consider it a PC version of the iMac

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Not very hackable/expandable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could make a riser board with a PCI bridge to allow for more PCI slots or mutliple PCI peripherals if you do so desired.

  18. Processors? by djweis · · Score: 1

    How expensive are the processors for that board? I've not seen them out in retail.

    1. Re:Processors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 933 can be had for about $60. I run VIA processors in all of the linux firewalls that I build. I use either 1U RM's or SV-24 cases, and the Via's don't need active cooling (i.e. no fan, just heatsink). No concerns of a fan dying down the road burning up the processor.

  19. No offense, Rob, but.. by EricKrout.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    No offense, Rob, but I don't want a "volatile, highly flammable liquid, C2H5OC2H5, derived from the distillation of ethyl alcohol with sulfuric acid and used as a reagent and solvent" on MY motherboard ;-)

    MONOLINUX :: We Prefer Having The Right To Manage Our Own Freakin' Media Files, Thank You

    1. Re:No offense, Rob, but.. by Loligo · · Score: 1


      When I think ether, I think of Bugs being chased through the castle by the mad scientist, bounding down the stairs slowly, drunkenly calling, "Coooome baaaaack, miiiiiister buuuuuunny"...

      But I was never really a chemgeek.

      -l

    2. Re:No offense, Rob, but.. by ThePlague · · Score: 0

      One thing that cartoon failed to mention about ether is its foul smell, almost nauseating. Another is that the effect of ether is closer to being drunk than dilation of time perception.

  20. Small PCs make excellent Linux boxes by reaper20 · · Score: 2

    I've used some BookPC's for second computers and the such. They are awesome for that little size. Looks like mobo's like this will help push the little stuff forward. Once you get past the old "little piece of junk that doesn't compare to my full blown rig", they're capable machines. Having your linux distro recognize all that built-in stuff would be a plus.

    I wish that other manufacturers would jump into this boat and push this market further, I'm not buying anything by VIA anytime soon.

    1. Re:Small PCs make excellent Linux boxes by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      I have an ECS K7SEM, actually 7 of them. They are a smaller board with a similar VIA chipset to the ones in the book PC. Everything that is on board works in Linux. I've only had a problem with one of them, the network card disappeared. I'm not sure what happened, but I can't get the onboard ethernet to work anymore. Luckily a realtek card that even uses the same Linux module as the one on the motherboard is only $10 and I had some spares in stock, so I didn't take much time to troubleshoot it, I just put a new card in.

      I really havn't had any problems with the VIA all in one chipset, except X support for the VGA part of it, which kind of sucks right now. 2.4.17 and later include some patches to help the framebuffer work with it though, and there are some patches out that aren't in the main kernel tree yet that also help some. It's still a bitch to get acceleration in Mesa going. Anyway, if you aren't using it for games, then it's fine.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  21. Heatsink? What Heatsink by baptiste · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone notice how the CPU in the pictures says 'Fan/Heatsink Required' yet there are no apparent mounting mechanisms for them? Guess you could use an adhesive heatsink - but I'd rather not! Ah OK - they've got two screw holes - but they don't seem to be in the usual spots? I guess VIA will ship a heatsink with this baby too? Site doesn't seem to mention it

  22. Regarding the images on their site by 3ryon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have no respect for people who don't realize that there is no point in ZIPing a JPG.

    1. Re:Regarding the images on their site by zsmooth · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I wouldn't be surprised if they were zipped multiple times "just to be sure".

    2. Re:Regarding the images on their site by Apple2U · · Score: 1

      I know!, Wow they even saved one K on the one picture by zipping it, and less than 10K on the other picture on their site. Judging by their pictures I'd never buy anything from them they clearly don't know what they are doing!

      Why make your users download and uncompress a file all for a couple of K!

    3. Re:Regarding the images on their site by juliao · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, could that be why the motherboard didn't turn out QUITE as small as they meant to??

    4. Re:Regarding the images on their site by merlin_jim · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Actually, for the windows crowd, this is equivalent to tarring up a bunch of JPGs... no size improvements, but what you do get is an easily transportable package, like a photo album or some such item...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    5. Re:Regarding the images on their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well hey, ya know, they gotta conserve badwidth somewhere, Geocities limits are fairly low

    6. Re:Regarding the images on their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no respect for people who have no respect for people who don't realize that... ah nevermind.

    7. Re:Regarding the images on their site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~ does offer data integrity and some small, small compression benefit

    8. Re:Regarding the images on their site by Chagrin · · Score: 2, Informative

      In this case there was only one .jpg inside the .zip file.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

    9. Re:Regarding the images on their site by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Yeah... I realized that after the site un-slashdotted. :)

      I just can't believe someone modded my comment as informative!!!

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    10. Re:Regarding the images on their site by plagioclase · · Score: 1

      This is just a guess on my part:
      They may have zipped the image to keep their website from becoming a picture server for anyone who doesn't want to spend their own bandwidth. When an image is over a Megabite, I could see that becoming a problem, especially if it's 'posted' on a heavily trafficked webpage.

      --
      Yeah, I have a webcomic...
  23. Good for a router.... by JPriest · · Score: 1

    I like the come of the new smaller form factors. They can be used for smaller tasks like replacing the clunky 486's that some people call routers or tweaked out and taken to lan parties.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  24. Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by cgi-bin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could easily be smaller if they got rid of the serial and parallel i/o. Ps/2 needs to go too! There's enough usb stuff out there that something like this shoudln't need them.

    I haven't used serial/parallel/ps2 in over a year at least. Disable them all in the bios to save interupts.

    --
    -Doug "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." -- Arthur C. Clarke
    1. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      You will be interested in ABits new legacy free motherboards then, the IT7 and AT7, which do not have serial, parallel or PS2 ports on them, but do have 10 USB ports.

      News on HardOCP today. The Intel board uses i845 and has 10 USB2 ports but support for DDR266 only. The AMD board uses KT333 and has 4 USB2 ports and 6 USB1.1 ports, and support for DDR333.

    2. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      serial? yes, and good riddance.

      ps/2? no. i am thinking good ol' keyboards, like the one i am using right now ;-)

      parallel? not sure, maybe.

    3. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Rice-Pudding · · Score: 1


      If, as the article says, this is to be used in printers and other small embedded systems, there is still a need for serial and parallel ports. Many *many* devices out there still use these things. Same goes for the large headers which take up space above the memory connectors.

    4. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Well, if you were going to use this motherboard in embedded applications you might find serial or parallel i/o quite useful. Depending on the OS used, you might need the ps/2 ports as well. I think the theory behind keeping them is that the number of customers who need them outweighs the nickel or so extra they cost to provide.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    5. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use win2k, usb mice aren't supported in safe mode. (at least not by default) PS2 mice stop working the instant they're unplugged and require a reboot to get them working again. (this happens to me enough to complain) Serial mice are perfect.

      And parallel port... well it's very easy to build an incredibly simple piece of hardware that interfaces to it, but I suspect not many people need that.

    6. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by retrac · · Score: 4, Informative

      I guess you only use a computer to play games on.

      They actually have quite a few other uses. How do you program a FPGA using usb? how about legacy printers? LED control? modified pushbutton interface? custom card scanners?

      I think you need to come to terms that the only use of a computer isn't just to play games with the newsest usb joystick/mouse/keyboard.

    7. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are USB to Rs-232 and Printer port converters.
      I wonder how many of those hardware printer port hacks out there will live through the conversion to WindowsXP/2000/NT? I have seen them us it for everything includeing programming basicstamps and inputing data from stenomachines. You just can not bash pits on hardware like you used to.
      With Linux someone could write a system friendly way to use the ports for Bit bashing :)

    8. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, speak for yourself. I was eyeing this as a nice little one port terminal server. Stick a bootable 64MB compactflash card in it with a minimal linux install, ssh, and terminal software and voila. Your own homemade terminal server for your colocation box. If you took the serial off it'd be useless to me.

    9. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So use freedos. Duh. Programming chips does NOT need pre-emptive multitasking. Any old 286 will due just fine.

    10. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Casca · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't set up or work on many cisco routers/switches then eh?

      --
      Casca
    11. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Tower · · Score: 1

      Depending on your enviornment... I have a few different machines all hooked up to a KVM switch (ps/2). Now, a couple of the systems support USB (one only recently after the NT4->W2k switchover), and the others have broken (Via) or non-existant (Alpha) USB ports... Even if I did switch, I'd need to invest in a new KVM, cables, and new kb/trackball - I haven't found anything as good as my Logitech Trackman Marble (pre-mouse-wheel)...

      I also use serial cables for connecting to the UPS (no direct net module yet, and no USB support on the real ones), interfacing with my 6811 and 68332 EVBs, etc, etc..

      I disable my USB ports and IDE controllers to save interrupts, which leaves me more than enough...

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    12. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Catbeller · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And still no Firewire ports...

      when Intel decides it wants no part of a superior technology, they go the whole nine yards and half a decade, don't they?

      I mean, really, COME ON, give it up Intel!!

    13. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when you are going to embedded space. The hardware type can do all kind of interfacing to these ports with minimum efforts. You can interface a simple character based LCD with just the parallel port and no parts other than a contrast control. Beat that in USB land.

      USB requires an embedded processor on the peripheral so requires additional engineering efforts /parts.

    14. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB based JTAG programmers exists, but cost a lot more than the parallel port version.

      The Xilinx one cost a bundle and was much slower than the than parallel port version.

    15. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to come to terms with the fact that every PC motherboard doesn't need to support every possible permutation of PC based device.

      I think you need to come to terms with the fact that MOST people DON'T use a general purpose computer to program FPGAs, control LEDs, create modified pushbutton interfaces, or use custom card scanners. If you need to do these things, get a computer that has the needed features. Don't saddle the rest of us with them for all eternity.

      There seem to be a number of FPGA prototyping boards with USB support. There are parallel-to-usb cables. If there aren't satisfactory options for these or the other examples, I sense a business opportunity.

    16. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Could easily be smaller if they got rid of the serial and parallel i/o. Ps/2 needs to go too! There's enough usb stuff out there that something like this shoudln't need them.

      I haven't used serial/parallel/ps2 in over a year at least. Disable them all in the bios to save interupts.
      Hey, this is Slashdot, and a lot of people here use Linux :-) USB support for Linux devices isn't exactly, ahem, what I'd call "universal" yet.

      One of the biggest disadvantages to the latest breed of laptops, IMO, is the lack of built-in serial (and to a lesser extent parallel) ports. Switches, filers, servers, and many other devices still have serial consoles these days, and for a lot of embedded purposes, serial is even more useful.

      One smart approach to get the best of both worlds is to just have jumpers or other small connectors on the motherboard, to allow people to wire up a serial/parallel port if they wish, but they don't take up much space if you choose to ignore them.

      PowerLeap's Renaissance product does just that, and while it's designed to use your existing motherboard (as just a benign card holder, with no power to it), and hook up to your existing power supply, it could rock as a single board computer, giving the Mini ITX a run for it's money size-wise.

      -me
      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    17. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Equinox · · Score: 1

      PS/2 is not supposed to be hot swapped...in fact, I've heard and witnessed several accounts of frying ports when it is done...

    18. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Genom · · Score: 2

      Hmm...drop the serial/parallel/ps2 ports, and pick up 2 more USB...then add 2 Firewire ports. Might not drop the size (what with the extra 4 connectors and such) but it would make for a very tasty little machine...

      But, as has been said by others, they're primarily targetting the embedded market, and only have light interest in a bunch of geeks looking to build their own tiny machine - so the parallel/serial/ps2 ports make a lot of sense.

      Still wouldn't mind a second model without the legacy ports ;P

    19. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think you need to come to terms with the fact that MOST people DON'T use a general purpose computer to program FPGAs, control LEDs, create modified pushbutton interfaces, or use custom card scanners. If you need to do these things, get a computer that has the needed features. Don't saddle the rest of us with them for all eternity.

      Most people do not have use for such a small integrated motherboard in the first place. Such a small board may indeed be used to program FPGAs, control LEDS, create modified pushbutton interfaces, and/or use custom card scanners. Maybe thats because it is aimed at a embedded environment as well as a small general purpose workstation/NC.

      In fact, if anything, VIDEO should be left out as an option! You could always add a graphics card via the PCI slot. I may agree that a parallel port is not needed, especially if you somehow chain it off the USB bus. However, a serial console may be invaluable: how would you use that via a serial line chained off a usb bus?

    20. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the BIOS supports USB (i.e. you can use usb devices as a console on boot) serial will always be in many machines especially servers, routers etc. When you can boot an OS using a usb "serial" console, then RS232 will go away.

    21. Re:Will serial/parallel ever die ?!? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Disable them all in the bios to save interupts.

      Why save on interrupts if the devices you're using only require one between them all?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  25. DMA-PIO Problem? by L-Wave · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this mobo has the Problem where upon rebooting the IDE controller switches to PIO mode?

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
    1. Re:DMA-PIO Problem? by Luke+Marsden · · Score: 1

      No, I don't.

      You'd be better off emailing VIA than asking a load of seething trolls who haven't even had a chance to buy this board yet :)

      Anyway, why is this a problem? Most modern operating systems set the IDE controller to DMA if and when it's capable of it. Try putting a call to hdparm at the end of your SysV init scripts if you're using Linux.

    2. Re:DMA-PIO Problem? by L-Wave · · Score: 1

      I was jsut curious. I recently got a laptop with XP that *was* plagued with the problem. It was getting switched to PIO mode 4, which sucks up 100% of CPU time, it left me with VERY choppy dvd playback and pretty much unreliable cd reading. No I haven't tried linux on it, as I have a seperate linux box (funny, im beginning to dig microsoft XP after expecting to hate it....) Anyways to make a long story short, after much aggravation a patch fixed it.

      p.s. - Note that XP has "Use DMA when Available" ... therefore it does not ALWAYS use DMA. I wonder if the problem occurs in win98? I doubt it.

      --
      I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
  26. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these... by Squeezer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'll say it before someone else does :)

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  27. Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by MajroMax · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The summary failed to mention that there's a 10/100 ethernet card built into the board, and a PCI slot to boot, making the board useful for things beyond simple embedded systems.

    Although I wouldn't use it as a desktop system (although perhaps for non-techies...), something like this might be perfect for small network-access terminals of the kind used in stores and universities. Even in the home, something like this might be good as a stereo-system replacement (using the PCI slot for a decent soundcard, vs. integrated sound).

    Are there any cases that would work decently with this design, though, or would something have to be custom-built?

    This mobo is just begging for a beowulf cluster mention, but I suspect that the release price will make conventional solutions less expensive for quite some time.

    --
    "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
    1. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by KingKire64 · · Score: 1

      COuld you imagine a boewolf cluster of these.... WTF am i talking about, NM.

      --
      "All I can tell the "lesser of two evils" folks is that if they keep voting for evil, they'll keep getting evil."-Lp.org
    2. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by adolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also perfect for in-car systems.

      Low-power, low-cost, very small, and very few electrical connections to worry about. Also plenty fast enough for anything you'd ever need to do while driving on the highway.

      All it takes is a handfull of regular PC parts, some manner of enclosure, and a reliable power supply. The whole thing should end up being small enough to fit under the front seat, which is nice for a variety of reasons (not the least of which that it is climate controlled).

      I envision a plain steel box, perhaps from a company like Sescom, or just whatever I can find at a local surplus house. It doesn't have to be easily modified, only solid.

      Does anyone know of a source for an appropriate power supply, or a kit, or even just plans for one?

      -

    3. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by LordCrumb · · Score: 1

      > Does anyone know of a source for an appropriate power supply, or a kit, or even just plans for one?

      I'm working on a PC-based MP3 player for my car, so I've done a fair amount of looking. There are a couple of sets of plans floating around the net, but the current they generate is inadequate for my purposes. This is a good resource, with links to many examples of DIY projects.

      The only commercially-produced DC power supplies I've found are made by Arise. They have several models that might suit the purpose, like these.

      If anyone is aware of a better solution, I'd love to hear about it!

      [LordCrumb]

    4. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by Vis · · Score: 1

      Since you have no email that I can easily find as I sit in this rather boring class I'm taking today, I'm forced to post this slightly off-topic reply. At least it's now here for all to (potentially) benefit from.

      You may wish to try searching for some HAM radio websites. Many HAM operators are very friendly, and run radios out of their vehicles. In fact, a large majority of HAM equipment is designed around +12VDC power supplies... Once you get +12VDC regulated and stable, -12VDC, +/-5VDC and 3.3VDC is relatively easy (espicially for the relativly low amperage requirements for these voltage levels).

      --
      -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
    5. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by ahhhmytoes · · Score: 1
      I found plans for a power supply here. For +5V, it uses the MAX787 and for +3.3V, the MAX788, two efficient switching power supply ics. That should achieve 80% effeciency or so, and supply 5A of power for each.

      For +12 and -12, it uses LM2587, another switching regulator, then steps the -12 down to -5. This seems like overkill to me; the efficiency gained isn't worth the extra parts.

      For +12, I would use an LM1084 (powered from the car battery), which doesn't have the effeciency of a switching regulator, but doesn't require any inductors.

      For -5 and -12, I would use 2 ICL662s (powered from +5 and +12, respectively), which will only supply 300mW each, but that's all we need for negative supplies.

      The "typical application"s of the ICL662 and LM1084 should work fine; check out the datasheets.
      National Semiconductor (LM ics)
      Maxim-IC (MAX and ICL ics)

      (BTW, last time I checked, coilcraft doesn't give away samples for the inductors that the website references)

    6. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by thogard · · Score: 1

      The +12 is useful to spin up the harddrive but whats the -12 for? An exercise in building no load power supplies?

    7. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, the -12v is only used for the serial port. I have managed to power up boards without it before, although, obviously, the serial ports didn't work.

    8. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The +12 is useful to spin up the harddrive but whats the -12 for?

      RS-232

    9. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low amperage? What exactly are you talking about? +5V line has the biggest amperage requirements on a PC system.

      Sure, it's still doable from +12VDC, but certainly not a "low amperage".

    10. Re:Perfect for "hidden" home systems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, no modern RS-232 chip uses either +12V or -12V. They all use a tiny DC/DC supply and a few caps.

  28. Small Wonder by gordon_schumway · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a whole website about Small Wonder!

    --

    Ha! I kill me!

    1. Re:Small Wonder by gordon_schumway · · Score: 1

      Check out the times! I beat you by 7 minutes (according to slashcode, at least).

      --

      Ha! I kill me!

  29. Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink by cybergibbons · · Score: 3, Informative

    C3 doesn't really require that much cooling, and could probably cope with a smallish passive heatsink stuck on with thermal adhesive. The processor is integrated onto the board anyway, so it most likely does come with a cooling solution, but they took it off for pretty pictures.

  30. Supports 2 PCI cards? by cybergibbons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just before the site got completely /.ed , I saw that it said that it could support 2 pci cards, but only one slot? Is this some form of riser card arrangement? Did anyone see it before it stopped working?

    1. Re:Supports 2 PCI cards? by daveilers · · Score: 1

      it had an optional cable you could buy to use the second pci slot.

    2. Re:Supports 2 PCI cards? by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

      Its probably a riser and a cable, although they only say cable. Almost all of the PCI signals are shared on a the PCI bus except for a few device select/grant signals, which probably are side chained out of one of those headers near the PCI slot.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:Supports 2 PCI cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of their original reference board was a little bigger, closer to 190mm x 190mm and it had three normal PCI slots.

  31. But it is by wiredog · · Score: 2, Redundant

    (170mm)^2.

  32. Woohoo! by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

    I dunno about the rest of you, but I'm pretty excited about this. I know there are smaller motherboards out there, but this one actually seems like it could make a useable computer. I'm working on installing a number of computers in my car, but what I really need is a small, portable computer that can support dual monitors. Oh, well - things are at least getting closer.

    --
    If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
  33. Don't PDAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have motherboards smaller than this?

    1. Re:Don't PDAs by qurob · · Score: 1

      They don't have Intel Celeron chips, PCI slots, etc

      My watch has a really small 'motherboard' if you want to get into that kind of stuff :)

    2. Re:Don't PDAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in fact I do. :)

  34. parentScore += 1; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was making a joke about this:
    Posted by CmdrTaco on Wednesday March 13, @01:51PM
    from the its-so-cute dept.
    DrGonzo was among several who submitted news of the new Mini Motherboard from via. The Mini ITX standard is just 170mm squared, and this motherboard has audio, ether, IDE, video and tv out. Not bad for something so tiny. Here's an article about the small wonder

  35. Yes please clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be interesting.

    These shitty trolls and such are almost like those worthless blind communist movements of the last century.

  36. LTSP by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    Man, I'll tell ya, this would be PERFECT for teminal servers, but I don't see anywhere in the white paper or in the specs about supporting PXE or Etherboot protocols. Most embedded mobos support at least PXE for LAN booting.

    Oh well, I guess you can't have it all!

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  37. PCI Dual-head Matrox card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will sort out the last problem. Please take photos of your wonder and what you use it for in the car.

  38. Re:The site: (HTML Version of the PDF spec sheet) by llamalicious · · Score: 2, Informative

    not to karma whore or anything but, check Google's HTML version of the PDF

  39. On-board DRM by rlp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone notice this in the description of TV-OUT:
    Integrated Macro Vision 7.01.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:On-board DRM by edwazere · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Fuckwit moderators again, How is this post redundant when the only other post I can see about the macrovision was posted 5 minutes afterwards...

      And they probably won't even be bitch slapped by the meta moderation 'cos they won't see the other post... Makes me mad...

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
    2. Re:On-board DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It's not redundant. But it is incorrect.

      Macrovision is inherently analog copy protection. The only place I've ever seen it digitally is on DVDs, where it enables the Macrovision generator circuit to cause the analog copy protection on the TV outputs (which is totally useless unless you want to dupe the DVD to VHS, which misses the point of DVD, and doesn't stop pirate houses that buy Macrovision stippers for $50).

  40. What do you need PCI for? by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its got quite a bit of onboard I/O on it already. AGP video, sound and ethernet have been taken care of as has TV out. What would you use the PCI slot for other than maybe a modem or second NIC? This isn't meant to be a mainstream gaming machine or desktop box... However at the price they've quoted I'd bet it would work well as a portable MP3 box for the car or whatnot. It's ogt lot's of possibilities IMO. Maybe slap a wireless card in it and go wardriving with it? :-)

    P.s. Looks like one of the optional modules was a cable for a "2nd PCI device" so perhaps it's more flexible than you realized?

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:What do you need PCI for? by shlong · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you're arguing or agreeing with me. With only one PCI slot, it's not suited for the home-desktop, where people might want to add a IEEE 1394 card and a DSL card. You are basically repeating everything I said...

      --
      Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
    2. Re:What do you need PCI for? by BoyPlankton · · Score: 1

      I would use the PCI slot for a T.V. Tuner card in a homebuilt PVR.

    3. Re:What do you need PCI for? by dead_penguin · · Score: 2

      With built-in sound, video and ethernet, most home desktops wouldn't even need a single PCI slot. Your points about adding things such as an IEEE1394 card or DSL are interesting, but very few people would need this. I can't see too many average adding 1394, and most dsl connections (that I've dealt with) are accessed as external modems over etherent.

      I think the only upgrades home users are generally interested in are adding a larger hard-drive, and increasing the ram in the machine.

      Personally, I think I wouldn't be too happy with this sort of a system unless it was significantly cheaper. Then again (like many of us here on slashdot), I don't think I'm the average "home user".

      --

      It's only software!
    4. Re:What do you need PCI for? by bats · · Score: 1

      Better yet, make it a high definition TV tuner card. You can watch HDTV content on your normal TV, then when HDTV's are more affordable, get one sans tuner and use the VGA output from the mini motherboard to watch real HDTV, not to mention progressive scan DVD.

    5. Re:What do you need PCI for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did read his post, right? It has two PCI slots by using the extra cabling. So your counterexample actually bolsters his claim which you seem to be against by arguing he's agreeing with you. Silly, huh?

  41. ITX Cases??? by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

    This is a great looking mobo, but as it stands they don't seem to mention any ITX size cases. I'd hate to buy this cute little mobo and not have anywhere to put it except my big oversized ATX case

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  42. tv out features: "* Integrated Macro Vision 7.01"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this what it sounds like, and if so, why do they think their customers need it?

  43. Shuttle already using it? by JPriest · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here is anandtech's review of the Shuttle's SV24 using the mini ITX form factor? and here is a spec I pulled on various form factors.

    Mini-iTX
    170mm 170mm

    iTX
    215mm 191mm

    Flex ATX
    215mm 191mm

    Mini ATX
    284mm 208mm

    ATX full
    305mm 244mm

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Shuttle already using it? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      the correct link

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Shuttle already using it? by JPriest · · Score: 2, Informative

      BTW the shuttle is only based on the micro-ITX spec but is not the same.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  44. Flash Memory on board? by detritus. · · Score: 2

    Storage (Flash): DOC Flash memory (8MB ~ 32MB) on board

    Anyone know the purpose of this flash memory is? I would hope it can be used to boot lilo or other similar loaders. I was pleased to see this mobo has no floppy controller. A little off topic, but why not integrate motherboards with a Type I PCMCIA slot? IMO, CompactFlash would make an excellent (and logical) replacement for the floppy drive, especially with the vast amount of cameras and mp3 players that use it.

    I once had hopes for an magnetic media-based open standard to replace floppies (Iomega Zip) but not anymore. Even Award and AMI was forced into supporting zip drives as a bootable device option. IIRC, the zip drive is probably the only proprietary piece of hardware supported by these BIOSes (for AT/ATX standards).

    1. Re:Flash Memory on board? by Dr.+Ion · · Score: 2, Informative

      DOC is DiskOnChip, from M-Systems. It's a flash memory chip that can replace the BIOS chip and provide some amount of nonvolatile storage.

      Their magic is in their BIOS "enhancement" code that makes the flash memory appear as a bootable disk drive. In DOS, it shows up as C:, and they have boot code for several operating systems, including Linux. Linux drivers for mounting/writing the filesystem are also available.

      Second, you don't need a PCMCIA slot to use CompactFlash as a boot device. CompactFlash is already IDE-compliant and can be directly plugged into the IDE controller with the right adapter. They run about $20 from places like this.

      The CompactFlash solution would give you a removable boot device that could be easily mounted/read on any other system. The DOC is smaller, but more convenient since it's already integrated.

    2. Re:Flash Memory on board? by ArcticChicken · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting that link to the 'mydigitaldiscount' site. I've been looking for internal IDE/ATAPI compact flash adapters for a while now. Those external USB adapters have become so common I'm sure you'll be able to buy them at grocery stores soon. Why are internal ones so darn hard to find? Don't manufacturers understand that I've got a decent sized computer case on my desk with a few empty drive bays for a reason? The last thing I want is another stupid little item to take up more space on my desk - and certainly not one that's effectively chained to my computer with another cable to get in the way.

      The only drawback I can see to the internal adapter on that site you mentioned is that they state that it needs a card inserted before powering-on the system. In the manual, it also recommends having a card inserted when shutting down your OS. I'm hoping to find an adapter that follows the more flexible ATAPI route that CD-ROM drives and ZIP drives offers - i.e. unhindered hotswap capability. The only possibility I have remaining is this unit. With few details provided, and having not run into anyone who's tried it, I guess I'm just going to have to shell out the $80 to see how it works.

      Darnit! These sorts of internal adapters should be dead commmon by now! What year is it? 1986?

      Death to the floppy drive!

    3. Re:Flash Memory on board? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      embedded application sometime uses flash instead of hard drives...

  45. Its Eric's 21st birthday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and some people might celebrate it "appropriately"...

  46. Thanks, but no. by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the video specs:

    * Integrated Macro Vision 7.01

    Macrovision is a feature on just about every TV-out card you can buy today. This means that you cannot do any of the following without macrovision interference:

    - Tape a video game. Sure, who would do this without being a complete gamer luzer. I can think of a few reasons to tape video game play. The one that comes to mind most readily are the occasional tournaments that happen on the MMORPG's and Shooters. Wouldn't you like to have a permanent record if you were the victor or a high ranker in such a tournament?

    - Produce your own video to tape. You produce an original video, but you can't tape it without interference patterns or light noise. This doesn't even aid the hollywood studios, other than cutting potential amature video producers out of the loop. Mostly it just aids producers of high-end video hardware which gives the user control on the kind of output and copyprotection he wants on his stuff.

    - Reproduce non-copyrighted or grey-area video. Anime fansubs are very rapidly becoming an all-online phenominon. Non-english anime videos are recorded from TV or other sources, subtitled, and then distributed for free in areas where that video is not otherwise available. Suppose you wanted to share such a video with someone who doesn't have a computer and can't play back Divx files? Unless you have a way to bypass macrovision, you're SOL.

    - Play DVD's from your computer's DVD player on your TV. If you had a perfectly good Computer DVD setup and TV out device, why should you bother buying a separate standalone DVD player? Ease and convenience, sure, but many who don't care or are trying to save money, this is an extra expense.

    Until I can get a video-out card that doesn't have macrovision enabled, I'm sticking with my pre-macrovision Matrox PCI card for TV out purposes.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Thanks, but no. by Junta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most are viable points, however, *display* on TV should always, in theory, be fine (though you can certainly tell the difference side-by-side, most of the time you can't tell independently. So the point about playing DVD on TV can be thrown out, computers are no worse, if not better than most standalone players (progressive-scan easier). So you refuse to buy MacroVision products? Have you bought any Paramount VHS tapes? A standalone DVD player? Those are MacroVision encoded. The point is to screw over VCRs, by sending signal spikes that would not be perceived by the human eyes but trick a VCR into reducing signal strength of normal content to compensate. On much older VCRs, which don't automatically adjust the signal, this makes no difference. Also, you can pick up devices to defeat MacroVision at Best-Buy that work perfectly. Pre-MacroVision would mean pre-PCI, this is not new technology. Fortunately, if you search the web enough you can probably figure out how to disable MacroVision for nearly any video chipset.

      As an aside to your point, in most cases, MacroVision is typically only enable when the drivers detect that content is being displayed that "shouldn't" be copied, so game recording probably works. I think in most cases they go by process listing and display state, if you open an overlay in a different colorspace, macrovision enables, if realplay.exe, mplayer.exe, qtplayer.exe appears in process table, macrovision enables. This is one of the major reasons companies are reluctant to release open-source drivers for tv-out devices, as they all have modifiable registers for enabling/disabling macrovision, and open source drivers would probably get them it hot water with the MPAA/RIAA.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Thanks, but no. by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 1
      Is MacroVision something that your DVD player program turns on if the DVD is copy-protected?

      Or do the drivers always turn this crap on no matter what video is going out?

    3. Re:Thanks, but no. by Junta · · Score: 2

      On VHS tapes, it is on the tapes....

      As far as I can tell, DVD macrovision is by and large done by the playback device, and therefore depends on implementation. For example, my dxr2 has a register that has the effect of disabling or enabling macrovision. The linux drivers document this register (precisely what manufactuers don't want) :)

      Under windows this translates to an enable/disable macrovision checkbox in special apps...

      As to whether a DVD can explictly request MacroVision or if it is always *supposed* to be on, I don't know. In any event it seems that the playback device can ignore any such request :)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Thanks, but no. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Just get one of those sima video copy masters (I found mine a circut city) I'm not sure if it will defeat macrovision 7.0 but it seems to be able to defeat macrovision that comes with most dvd players.

    5. Re:Thanks, but no. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      go to Ebay.
      buy a Hollywood+ or Creative DXR3

      no macrovision, accelerated Mpeg hardware playback. 100% supported under linux.

      everything else is pure junk in comparison.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Thanks, but no. by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Hollywood+/Creative DXR3 use the same chipset, and they both have Macrovision support. The Hollywood+ is easier to disable Macrovision for than the DXR3 is (I don't know why, maybe drivers?).. at least in Windows. I don't know what the case is in Loonix.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    7. Re:Thanks, but no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      macrovision is done in software... fortunately Linux drivers arent crippled with that feature.

      So nice to actually have the source code.

    8. Re:Thanks, but no. by BAKup · · Score: 1

      Here's the funny thing:

      The MacroVision is supposed to be off, unless the content provider payed money to the macrovision people to be able to turn that bit on to active the macrovision.

  47. Size matters by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    [170mm on a side]

    Well, considering the ATX form factor of a new cabinet (like the one I *just* got), if it were 150mm on a side, you might be able to pack two of them in a cabinet. Which has some possibilities. As it is, it's going to fit a smaller box, great. Be like the Apple cube or something.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  48. Here's your answer by dhamsaic · · Score: 2

    The Abit NV7m. Based on nVidia's nForce chipset. Supports Athlon XP's. Up to 1 Gig of unregistered PC2100 DDR RAM. Built in audio (nVidia, but I'd add a nice GeForce 3 Ti 500), sound (which is actually very very good) and LAN. MicroATX form factor. Lowest price is about $130 on Pricewatch, which is damn good.

    In other words, you're stupid if you don't go this route. I'm planning on building a full-featured LAN box with one of these, and I'll be spending about $1500 to totally deck it out - and that'll be with a 15" flat panel monitor for hauling to LANs.

    See you at Quakecon.

    --
    Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    1. Re:Here's your answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      built in video. argh. gg preview.

    2. Re:Here's your answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they use a Realtek ethernet controller.

  49. You are you geek friends can die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a life eric or maybe an email address.

    1. Re:You are you geek friends can die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eric and his geek friend are already dead. Thus, getting a life is not an easy task. However, occasionnally, fans still celebrate their birthdays...

  50. small cases by Eyetapper · · Score: 1

    Small motherboards are great. Unfortunately, most local vendors still carry computer cases the size of bathtubs. Can anyone recommend some sources of small computer cases to go with the smaller motherboards?

  51. small mobo = large pricetag for cases/PS by Sodakar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FlexATX, NTX, ?TX.... I admit I don't remember all the form-factors anymore, but one thing that has always bit me was the large pricetag for the cases and mini-power supplies. So... to all of you who are saying "this will make a small, quiet, cheap system..." I agree that it will be small and quiet (most 200W PS's are quiet), but I don't agree that it will be "cheap" -- the case and PS will probably cost $100. (and yes, I know PC cases can cost as high as $300, but the average, plastic case + PS is $30)

    There's always two major sacrifices for size -- and they usually are performance and cost.

    Still, I'm hopeful, as I would love to have a webserver the size of a Cobalt/Sun Qube, but at a comparitively low cost.

    1. Re:small mobo = large pricetag for cases/PS by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Build the case yourself, and use a small powersupply from MPJA or All Electronics

      It can be done for less than $30. Those places also have plastic and metal project cases that would probably do fine as a computer case.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  52. Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you can underclock by half so it doesn't need a cpu or power supply fan. At 400mhz it would still be a pretty good web server for static pages.

  53. Jenius plese read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have no mothers boards in Kanzlekistan. Please send me yours.

    -Jon

    1. Re:Jenius plese read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      JON- I have ported Wildcat BBS to my
      commodore so we can have long chat
      about Survivor. Please send me
      more DivX. THANKS.
      --JUNIS

    2. Re:Jenius plese read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Punis,
      I have a kaypro, but no modem. Please set your baud rate to 20bps and I will translate by hand. What is DivX. Also, I will apply for a E-mail account next week and post address.

      Sweet dreams,
      JOB

  54. thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the info

  55. it would be nice if next... by josepha48 · · Score: 2
    .. rather than integrating the video, sound, eth0 on the MB, to have them all small cards. not quite pcmcia, but 1/2 the size of the current pci cards. Then a computer case could be built that was 1/2 as winde as current cases and 1/2 as high and people could pick and choose their sound cards. With integrated components if one part fails and there is no slot on the mb you have to replace your mb to gete that component working again.

    Many network cards and sound cards today are 1/2 as wide as they were a few years ago, now they just have to make the part that you connect to the case 1/2 as wide. Small change there.

    This design in the article is the 'throw away design'. If something goes you just throw the whole thing away. Kinda like PDA's.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

    1. Re:it would be nice if next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heat becomes a very big issue. not only are all of the hot pieces of hardward crammed into a smaller space, but cooling is more difficult for the same reason; space. the more room, the better your chances of getting decent airflow. bad airflow and all of your new form factor components will die sonner than expected, causing you to spend more money (and possibly complain that "they don't last like they used to").

    2. Re:it would be nice if next... by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Most of the PCMCIA cards cannot be as full featured as integrated components. Ever seen a SBLive on PCMCIA or any video card on PCMCIA? It can't be done. There is enough room for things like ethernet cards, but anything more complicated will need a lot more room than a TypeIII card.

    3. Re:it would be nice if next... by josepha48 · · Score: 2
      If you look at most new eth cards today. Regular pc cards, they are 1/2 as wide as the slot they go in. They are as long as a pci slot, but the actual electronics of the card only fill up 1/2 the width. I'm not intereseted in pcmcia cards. The existing cards in a computer case have a place where you put the screw in and it holds it to the case. The little metal strip is usally 2x as wide as many eth cards made today. Many sound cards could also fit in this 1/2 space as well. As for viceo, I'm sure it could be done to. Thus the only thing in the case that needs that much width then is the cdrom and the power supply, both of which could be turned sideways like in most desktops.

      To cool this system you could have slots like you see in many stereo recievers(sp?) today with the vents and large heat sinks.

      This could be done. Imagine 2 computer cases on your desktop taking up the space of about 1 mid tower case. Connect that to a LCD and you gain back some of your deskspace that you lost in the paperless office. Now you have more place to spread all those papers that yo never got ride of. ;-)

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

    4. Re:it would be nice if next... by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      The cards might be half as wide as the slot, but they still require sometype of airflow between them to cool them. There is an optimum distance between cards at which the rising convection air from the bottom will produce very nice airflow, but above which the convection is more spotty. Below that space you have even more problems as there is not enough space for convection.
      Because of the cooling problems with the space between cards, it'd be very hard to put some of the heavy-duty video and sound cards into 1/2 slots. (I agree with the network, those require almost no processing and don't heat up noticebly)

      To counteract the problem of convection one could use some type of forced air (fan, etc) but then you need to expand the case to contain that and increase the noise the case creates. It's not that easy if everything isn't designed to be integrated (integrated cards don't stick out or move and therefore can designed for proper cooling)

    5. Re:it would be nice if next... by josepha48 · · Score: 2
      Part of the problem is that they use the new technology to make the processors and video faster. Most people do not need all the speed. Thus it is possible to make a none integrated video card that is 1/2 slot size as well as sound. The space between the cards could be increased slightly to help if needed but I don't think that is really an issue in cooling.

      The truth is that this is possible. While it may not be possible to have the newest and fastest computers it is possible to use current tech to make smaller, cooler, and almost as configurable computers as we currently have.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

  56. what i want by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    what i want is a machine aboutthe size of a minidisc player. but about twice as thick. and use minidiscs as removable storage - but it has to have an embedded geforce video.

    but this thing would do as well - as long as it can be incorporated into something the size of a cd player. and still must put a geforce chipset on there... even in a daughter board configuration.

  57. Smaller Still by guamman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I bought a smaller motherboard from Freetech a while ago with everything, and I mean everything, on board. It will take any PIII processsor and even includes firewire. The dimensions are about 150mm square. If anyone is interested, you have to buy it from Freetech directly, in Japan. Fortunately, VISA gives great exchange rates from dollars to yen. Check out this for more info.

    1. Re:Smaller Still by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      Looks cool... the one aggrevation is they stuck a Realtek NIC on instead of the Intel 82562 that Intel uses.

    2. Re:Smaller Still by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      I found the board on the site after a while of searching:

      http://www.freetech.com/u.s.a/1product-2-p6f209. ht m

      It's 170mmX170mm

      I seriously doubt anyone will find any board much smaller than 170X170, as the DIMM slots appear to be about 160mm long. It could probably be done with SODIMMs, though.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Smaller Still by RatOmeter · · Score: 1

      Well, they could place the 160 mm DIMM slots diagonally in order to shrink the MoBo, but that would require thinking outside the box.

      SO-DIMMs are almost universally the choice for PC/104 and PC/104 Plus SBCs. My main frustration with PC/104 SBCs is finding any that run over about 266 MHz.

    4. Re:Smaller Still by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Diagonal DIMM slots would use cut the board in half, reducing the number of square chips you could fit on there. If you could get triangle shaped ceramics on the chips, then I'm sure diagonal DIMMs would work well. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  58. Or even better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Autonomous, robotic, suicide bombers!

    What better time then passover to blow up some Zionist opressors!?

  59. and that is not all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed of the on-board Firewire and also the onboard Quad-IDE-RAID, i.e., the motherboard can control 12 IDE devices at ATA-133 speeds. ABit Press Release (Tongue in Cheek) Here

  60. who needs floppy/hd/cdrom??? by remou · · Score: 1

    floppy, hd???

    we have the spacewalkers setup
    diskless booting over the net...

    imagine the size of the case without
    hd, floppy, cdrom and as another
    poster pointed out, get rid of the
    parallel, serial, ps/2 ports on
    the board and make itself smaller
    too....:-)

    at this point you'd probably need
    a remote controlled alarm sound,
    so you can refind that goddamn thingie..:-)

    drool

    remo

  61. Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't need one at normal speed. Have many SV24s with no fans except in the power supply (no case fan or heat sink fan). The C3's don't neem'em.

  62. We have the Technology now lets have the Design by hs81 · · Score: 1

    Products like this are good news hopefully the PC manufacturers will take the opprtunity to design some cases with the imagination that Apple apply.
    There should be no reson why good design is ring fenced for the benefit of the Mac.
    All it will take is a manufacturer with imagination to exploit the opportunities MoBo's like this offer and build some really exciting PC's or home appliances for the home market.

  63. If what I know about most of these are true... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    They'll be relatively inexpensive. Retail for the whole shebang should be something on the order of about $300. They're gunning for set-top box territory with these, meaning that they have to be relatively inexpensive to begin with.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  64. Smaller boards with the same features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Okay the boards I list below are OLD NEWS. I've owned a PC-2553 for over a year, and a friend of mine picked up the PCM-5822 long before that.

    http://www.lannerinc.com/pc-2553.htm
    size: 90 x 96 mm

    http://www.advantech.com/products/PCM-5822.asp
    size: 145 x 102 mm

    1. Re:Smaller boards with the same features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you mind telling us how much did you pay for those cards?
      These links you;ve given seem to miss pricetags - rarely a good sign.

  65. Google's Cache (now in theatres everywhere) by SNACKeR · · Score: 1
  66. Who is he that he is so important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and why should people care?

    1. Re:Who is he that he is so important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and why should people care?

      Good question. Ask Katz, he seems to care the most...

      Meow!

    2. Re:Who is he that he is so important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dan, please Meow on a more appropriate forum.

      Thanks,

      Joe

    3. Re:Who is he that he is so important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joe,

      Are we engaged or not? Please decide.

      My parents will be home shortly.

      Kisses,

      Honey

  67. Maybe the BGA parts aren't at any more than that. by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    This is a BGA mounted part, meaning no upgrading CPU (This is less of an isssue than you'd think...) and I think they may not have the 900+ parts in the BGA form factor yet.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  68. Just one thing ... by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    It's got a Macrovision chip. Is it possible to disable or bypass this or would this be a violation of the DMCA?

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    1. Re:Just one thing ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Is it possible to disable or bypass this

      Why bother? Buy this instead.

      >or would this be a violation of the DMCA?

      Probably not, since video isn't digital.

  69. There's not much amazing about this.. by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    There's not much amazing about this. IDE, LAN, and sound are all on a standard Southbridge chip (like the ones by VIA), and video is integrated in cheapy Northbridge chips.

    Just not putting on PCI slots makes a motherboard this size.

  70. Minimal... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not MEANT to be upgraded, though. RAM, HD, and DVD/CD drives are the only "upgradeable" parts in this design. This isn't intended for the gamer/hardcore crowd. This is intended for the office space crowd and the home crowd where they have some minimal usage of things like games and DVD playback, but need a largely maintenance free machine that will do things like wordprocessing, etc.

    MOST people that want/need computers actually fall under that category, not the one that the /. crowd generally falls under.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  71. I can handle TWO PCI devices by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

    If your only beef is the lack of PCI it CAN take two cards. It also has 10/100 Ethernet on it so it can network just fine. With everything it's already got I was just wondering why more than one PCI card was so important. Insight is all...

    TV tuner makes sense, I hadn't thought of that but what else? I'd think that for many people this sucker would be pretty good. Not for a super-duper server or anything but you've got to give them credit - they put an awful lot into it.

    Hrm, wonder if it could be run off of a 12volt battery pack or gel cell. That CPU very thirsty? Very hot?

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  72. You're not looking at the right places... by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

    I just ordered some Casedge Micro/FlexATX small cases from www.techstore.com for ~$40. Some shops have the AOpen H340D with 180W P4-rated PSU (from Sparkle) for $45-50, too.

  73. where can I buy one of these NOW??? by davmct · · Score: 1

    This is freaking awesome! Now, if they only had an order form to BUY one now! I'd be all over that like a fat kid on a smartie.

  74. Re:Slowing down already... ./ effect by kbroom · · Score: 1

    hmmmm.... you mean the /. effect ?? :)

  75. Yes it is... compared to a regular mobo at least. by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

    I'm building a FlexATX box around the Intel D810EMO board, and that's pretty tiny... and these motherboards are smaller than that.

  76. S/PDIF by Gabrill · · Score: 1

    if this is the cure for living room computer needs, then does it support Direct3D 5.1 audio through S/PDIF?

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  77. The VIA literature _purports_ to support Linux... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    I know that the 2D/3D is from a Trident Cyberblade core, the sound's an unknown, but they claim at least soundblaster support (not as good as could be, but hey...), and I believe that the ethernet's supported under the latest stable kernels.

    As for performance, it's so-so. I've got an ECS box, branded the i-Note in hand, courtesy of my employer, that I've been playing about with. It's got a different (read: known to be supported and autodetected by Red Hat and others...) ethernet and sound chip choice, but I can give out some performance figures for the CPU all the same. For integer performance, it weighs in at the same basic performance level as a Celeron of the same clock speed. For floating point, it varies from task to task, but it performs anywhere from 1/2-3/4 as fast as a similarly clocked Celeron.

    As a gamer's toy, this has some, but limited appeal. As a general consumer device, this has some things going for it.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  78. Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Screwholes those aren't- they're those plastic rivets like you see on some of the earlier fansink setups on display cards. Also of note, the info on the chip says "Fan/Heatsink Required", but this beastie is just perfectly happy with a properly sized passive sink. I've seen boards with this CPU (with slightly different parts choices for ethernet and sound) that have this nifty gold colored heatsink that extends only about 3/8-1/2 of an inch above the chip- and they work very well.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  79. The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better by Akardam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (Specs here)

    This thing has PS/2, video, audio, 2 USB, 2 firewire, an expantion slot (PCI), takes up to a 1100MHz S370 CPU, and a gig of ram.

    Contrast this to the mobo from the story, which has an integrated CPU (yuck!, plus it's a Cyrix based, double-yuck!) and no firewire.

    I'm using the FV-24 for a project of mine and am VERY happy with it. Plus, it was only about 150USD retail, and it's already out there, available.

    1. Re:The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you find the SV24 for 150 USD? The cheapest I can find on Pricewatch is ~225 USD.

    2. Re:The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better by uradu · · Score: 2

      I believe he's talking just about the mobo, which can actually be had for even less (e.g. $115.95). Getting the complete barebones system for $150 would indeed be a steal.

    3. Re:The Shuttle FV-24 is MUCH better by T-Punkt · · Score: 2

      With the exception of the ethernet controller, the shuttle uses a realtek RTL8139 - probably the worst controller currently in production and one of the worst PCI ethernet controllers ever designed.

      I don't know anything about the Via VT6103 but I really doubt it can be worse than the realtek..

      I have no use for firewire and the Via board can be equipped with up to 32MB flash and two PCI devices (with an extra cable), it has a real audio system on board and not this cheopo-fixed-replay-rate-AC97 crap, it's smaller and it's cheaper.

      So it really depends on your needs what is the better motherboard.

  80. Smaller == Better?? by Chayce · · Score: 1, Troll

    I know the craze in the computer industry has been to make everything smaller, but there are those of us out there who still like to see large motherboards. I mean having a computer that is the size of a toaster is cool, but when you try and upgrade it's pretty much imposible. Add to that the increasing ammount of on board options that come standard (some of which are difficult to completely turn off if you want to use your own sound, video, or drive controlers). I'd just like to see a full size board that can be upgraded easily and has slots to put many cards in.

    --
    I like replies better than Karma, even if they are flames, because that tells me I got someone thinking.
    1. Re:Smaller == Better?? by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Why does someone always have to point out the obvious? If you want large boards go buy any one of the 4 gazzilion standard ATX boards out there? But for those of use who like to use our pc's differently we have great things like this! Personnaly i have been looking for something like this for a compact DivX/dvd/cd player, ie whole pc being no bigger than half your standard VCR/DVD.

  81. wow, it comes with ether? by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

    will it allow me to float around like bugs bunny?

    oh, you meant etherNET?

  82. I believe that it supports PXE... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Informative

    It would be an exception rather than the norm for boards in this class (which are generally intended for set-top and managed PC systems...). I've got several differing variations of this sort of motherboard as well as others in this class- they all support PXE.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  83. Better Motherboard here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out:

    http://www.flexus.nl/209/p6f209_is_used_via_pros av age_pm1.htm

    for a more flexible 17x17cm m/b complete with Linux support.

    1. Re:Better Motherboard here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe.. also look at:

      http://www.flexus.nl/barbone/barbone1.htm

      for a case like a penguin! :O)

  84. Set-top box... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    For some applications, 32Mb is all you need to support a Browser with enough plugins to handle most of the Internet- including distance learning applications.

    As for the question of the Type I slot; Type I is not terribly useful compared to having a Type II/III slot or a CF slot. In the case of not having a Type II/III slot, it's a little pricey. In the case of a CF slot, you can cheat and just map the device to the IDE chain- but they don't like doing that because they think they're going to be selling a lot of these things for IADs and they don't want anything that might be useful for repurposing the device. (Don't get me started on that- it's a battle I've had on many occasions over the past year with these people...)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  85. TV by mirabilos · · Score: 1

    TV Out?
    You guys really want to see your 1600x1280 X11
    desktop on a PAL, NTSC or SECAM device? Kidding?

    I'd rather like TV _In_ connectors *grin*

    But for the rest, these would give a nice
    beowulf cluster, while playing mp3z in
    hexadekadeo-surround ;)

    --
    My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
  86. Re:Thanks, but no. (Macrovision) by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    I wrote an email to their International Contact stating that I can't use this product because of Macrovision; I suggest others do the same (although copying verbatim is probably not appropriate in this case) The text of the e-mail follows:


    Hello,

    I am the chief engineer of an embedded system builder in the US, and I was
    excited to read the announcement for the Mini-ITX motherboard. I've been
    pricing and scoping out features of various biscuit PC, PC104, etc...
    formfactor motherboards, and it appeared that the Mini-ITX motherboard had
    the right features.

    However, upon reading the specifications on the VIA website at
    http://www.via.com.tw/en/VInternet/mini_itx.js p I was very disappointed by
    mention of "Integrated Macro Vision 7.01" on the TV Out. Macrovision is not
    a product feature; Macrovision is an obstruction. To my understanding, all
    Macrovision does is prevent customers from video-taping output from the
    device. With the myriad of possible system applications for a motherboard,
    what warrants inclusion of such a problem? This product will not meet our
    needs unless this feature can be removed, disabled, or omitted from
    production entirely.

    Please advise,
    --(my full name)


    The International Contact specified on their website is:

    Richard_Brown ATSIGN via.com.tw

  87. The only way that you can do that is... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    ...integration.

    You need PCI slots for things like video, lan, and sound. If they're all on the motherboard you don't need much in the way of PCI slots.

    What's so special is that this doesn't NEED a fansink, consumes a teacupfull of power compared to most other modern machines and weighs in somewhere between the prior generation of hardware and the top-end right now. It's enough for using in offices, etc. and is priced at the pricepoint for just the motherboard cost for the other machines.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  88. iMac mobo spanks it! by Refrag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The iMac mobo is small and circular! Beat that!

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:iMac mobo spanks it! by T-Punkt · · Score: 1

      Get handheld pc, dissemble it - iMac mobo beaten (in terms of size...)

    2. Re:iMac mobo spanks it! by Strog · · Score: 1
      Isn't the iMac 10.6" and the VIA mb ~7.5"?

      I must have a different defintion of "spank". Maybe we could add some curves on the outside of the VIA mb and make it the same size and circular.

    3. Re:iMac mobo spanks it! by Refrag · · Score: 1

      The exterior of the base of the iMac is 10.6". The mobo has to be smaller to be able to FIT INSIDE.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    4. Re:iMac mobo spanks it! by Strog · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the pictures? The mb goes right to the inside of the case. It still over 10"

  89. Is this why my laptop sucks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just got a new Dell Inspiron 4100 w/ DVD drive and WinXP. I can play DVD's on it just fine... But...

    in WinXP, when I use EITHER the TV-Out or the external monitor, I can drag the DVD window to the external display, but everything inside the window (the movie!) dissapears.

    When I boot into Linux and play the movie in xine, it's fine, on TV out, on external monitor, on whatever....

    Does this have anything to do with MacroVision? If so, it's obviously something that can be turned off. If it's not MacroVision, what the hell is it doing this anyway???!??

    1. Re:Is this why my laptop sucks? by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      That's not Macrovision. That sounds like a problem with bad video drivers. Lemme guess.. ATi?

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  90. Mirror by Peale · · Score: 2

    I've mirrored the original with a couple of changes Here

  91. S/PDIF multiplexed with video?! by dstone · · Score: 2

    I was pretty happy to read that they included consumer S/PDIF digital audio out. Then a little farther down in the specs, it says:

    One S/PDIF out (optional and multiplex with RCA TV out)

    Doh. That sucks. So I can't drive my (composite) TV and digital receiver simultaneously? Hopefully there's a way to split out the digital audio before the multiplexor and add another jack.

    1. Re:S/PDIF multiplexed with video?! by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      You can probably just use an RCA mono splitter.. Because S/PDIF is a digital signal, and not very high frequency.. it's probably perfectly separated from the composite signal frequncies.

  92. Re:The VIA literature _purports_ to support Linux. by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

    I agree that this thing has some limited appeal because of its expected performance. Are there any Nforce based motherboards on the horizon with a similar form factor? The superior cpu (AMD), memory architecture, graphics (GeForce2MX) and sound on a nforce based motherboard would make it a serious machine for the space conscious.

    --
    -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
  93. They are not pure HTTP compatible! Avoid them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.techstore.com will not work with Netscape Navigator or other browsers using only HTTP protocols.

    Unless I enable Javascripting (which I NEVER do to untrusted web sites such as this one) I cannot even get anywhere on www.techstore.com

    I will not be bookmarking it nore visiting it for any of my case purchasing needs.

    There have been a Javascript related expolits every couple years and until I stop seeing them for 3 years I will not use Javascript.

    NEVER have I ever seen such a thing on a RETAIL site. EVER.

    Congrats to them for losing a potential repeat customer that values HTTP standards and values security in all their web purchases.

    They should hire more talented web designers that know how to use regular HTTP to design a store front as 100% of all the other wev sites I buy things from use.

    1. Re:They are not pure HTTP compatible! Avoid them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that proves how mucha TOOL you are. Get Real.
      Javascript, FYI is an extremely useful tool for web based store fronts. You can manipulate the user's experience. Static HTML is on it's way out, if you can't tell! Funny thing is, only a very small percentage of sites I buy stuff from use static HTML. I'd say that on average, less than 10% of the sites I have ever bought from used HTML only fronts. I'd much rather have the products and services for the other sites, than be some paranoid freak who apparently dosen't know what he/she is talking about, and not get the products that I so desire.

      BTW, HTTP is a Transport Protocol. You can do all sorts of shit with HTTP, including feeding a browser some harmless JavaScript(which is netscape invented, and non-related to java in any case), sending out streams or what have you. I really think you probably menn HTML (that neato language that describes the sites you use, eh.)

      In any case, you are a foolish person. If you're too stupid to ignore the facts, that's your problem. If you're so freakin smart that you're paranoid beyond all reason, you could probably write a HTTP proxy to filter out all the harmful code a site could ever force feed your overly paranoid ass. But, since you seem to like HTTP so much, your connection isn't going to be secure. Thats' what SHTTP is for, definitely not regular ol HTTP, which any 4th grader and a c compiler could write a sniffer to get your vitals.

      Have a nice life, looser.

  94. Kharma burn by fobbman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    2001-11-06 18:46:10 VIA Announces New Tiny Mainboard Design (articles,news) (rejected)

  95. Ummm... actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's: "My name's not Shirley, and I never jest".

    1. Re:Ummm... actually... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      I was using the line from Airplane,which is "I am serious, and don't call me Shirley".

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  96. no fdc by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    yeah just thougth id point out cause i dont think anyone mentioned this yet, but this board has no floppy disc controler. i guess you could use a ls120 on the ide chan to read floppys but id rather use a 9 dollar floppy then a 100 dollar ls 120.

    --
    -
  97. It's not that great, but it's cheap by Animats · · Score: 2

    The real news here is that it costs $100. There have been single-board PCs smaller than this for years, but they've typically been low-volume items sold at much higher price points.

  98. If you want a cheap small package.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get one of these, $139 for the mobo + case and power supply. Just add CPU, memory, hard drive and CD/DVD.
    I had a drive, CD and floppy lying about, so I bought one
    of these for my parents with a 950 Duron and 128M RAM.
    Whole thing ended up costing me about $225.

    http://www.msicomputer.com./product/netpc/Slim62 18 .htm

  99. MediaGX by glsunder · · Score: 1

    remember that?

  100. It'll get to be the size of a paperback book by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    Get rid of the 5.25" bay, the 3.5" bay, the serial ports, the parallel port. Maybe even USB, eventually: Firewire is a superior tech. But let's leave one USB there for fun. Oh, an Ethernet port, of course. And a modem port.

    Here's where we get more fun out of life. Imagine it's 2005. IBM brings out MRAM on schedule, which is non-volatile RAM: no data loss on power down.

    We'd use some standard volatile RAM, probably just cache, to store things we don't want people to look at, particularly. So if the DRM stormtroopers grab your box, the evil bad MP3s get wiped wihout hope of discovery when you hit the panic button.

    The box is about the size of a paperback book, or maybe a VHS cassette. Two 1394 ports, a USB port for a keyboard, a digital monitor port. It has no hard drive, but, say, 10 gigs of MRAM. I have no idea what the power supply would be like; that may spoil my dream here. Okay, let's add a flash memory slot. For a CPU, let's say we go with the usual nanometer-level fab process, only instead of cranking the MHz up, we bring it down; this reduces the heat output a lot. Maybe a 500 MHz wonder.

    Optionally, you could put a cheap LCD screen on one side, maybe with a stylus input for those times you are sans keyboard. Then you can be covered if you want to carry this around.

    Okay, let's add a cheap camera. And a microphone and cheap speaker or earbud? Okay, there is a phone posibility there.

    Hmp. Let's put an 802.11 variant in there for wireless networking.

    Okay, let's dream some more, and instead of a battery, the thing runs on a couple of ounces of butane for a fuel cell.

    And let's just imagine this thing costs, oh, five hundred bucks.

    I see *A* future, and this is part of it.

    1. Re:It'll get to be the size of a paperback book by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      OKAY, I know, I described a laptop -- let's be clear. I want a non-clamshell brick, without moving parts, and with plenty of flexibility.

    2. Re:It'll get to be the size of a paperback book by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it wil have a Pentium 5, which will require a heat sink the size of Utah.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  101. Some more details (was: Heatsink? What Heatsink) by msquadrat · · Score: 1

    In the issue 04/2002 of the c't magazine from last month there was a test of the Eden 1500 (VE1500). The article isn't available online but here's a short summary (hmm... took me a while to find that issue :):

    The VE1500 (the test board was labelled VT6010 for any reason) is shipped with a 533 MHz processor. The passive heatsink is glued directly onto the processor, there's a second passive one on the VT8601A aka Apollo PLE133 nortbridge. FSB is 133 MHz, they got only PC133-333 RAMs working. The memory is shared with the Blade3D graphics chip of the northbridge.

    Did you know that VIA violates their own spec with this board? According to the spec there shouldn't be any 3.3-Volt supply but the board uses a standard ATX connetcor. An ITX power supply is only supposed to provide 47 Watts on three outputs (5 Volt Standby, 5 and 12 Volt). There's also a "problem" with standard ATX supplies: Even under full load the board neets only 7 Watts but a standard ATX power supply sucks much more.

    Additionally the VE1500 got only 59 points in the BAPCo SYSmark 2000 benchmark under Windows ME. SYSmark 2001 under Windows XP didn't even run. The rating is equal to the Sony Vaio PCG-C1VFK (Crusoe TM5600 @ 667 Mhz) or a Celeron 400.

  102. No, it's right. by pclminion · · Score: 2
    It says "170 mm squared." That means a square, 170 mm on a side. It's correct. It does not mean 170 square mm.

  103. One quite unit? by SWTP · · Score: 1

    If I read the spects right does the DOM offer the ability to drop the HD? :) With no noise for that and a hack adapter to pop in lets say 1/2 gig or even 1 GB of Flash would be one super quite little box!

    This is getting closer to the next level of PC. IE A brick you can program to drop on a problem that can do things! That does not cost both by it and the tools to get it to work.

    There are a lot of situation where quite, simple all in one excede fast, noise and big.

  104. Chibi PC-chan...^_^ by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    Although I wouldn't use it as a desktop system (although perhaps for non-techies...)

    Let's see. I sometimes work for a tech school. I wind up doing a lot of writing copy and correspondence. I occasionally need to access spreadsheets, and sometimes I need to pull up an Access database. (I know...pity me)

    I have an IBM Thinkpad 365X laptop. It runs Windows95 and Linux. It runs at 133MHz. It runs Office97 fine on the Windozer side. It also weighs 8 pounds. I keep it in a laptop backpack. It is heavy enough to where I call it "the papoose" at times. I could kill for something a bit faster than that laptop and much more portable. I've seen and used the Cappucino. It weighs a lot less than my laptop. It's my idea of portable.

    If I could build a chibi-chibi PC that I could easily transport between the office and home, I would no longer have to join the fight over the two usable workstations or lug my laptop around. All I would need would be a spare keyboard, monitor and mouse. Tech schools tend to have tons of those on hand.

    I am looking forward to small, portable computers using this new setup. No, this would not be the box to bring to a LAN party, despite the fact that you will be the only one there without a hernia. However, as a "take to the LUG meeting" machine or a freelancer machine it will truly shine.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  105. Re:Maybe the BGA parts aren't at any more than tha by thogard · · Score: 2

    Since '81 when I first started messing with PS's the only time I can think of when I upgraded a CPU was one of the early more effecent 8086 versions. I've downgraded a few because of fried CPUs for friends but in that case most of the box should have been thrown out.

    I figure its about time they start shipping the boards with 128mb of ram and maybe one socket to add more. That would work find for the application I have for this board.

  106. Convergence by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    I can really see how nice it would be to have integrated technology on one motherboard so my consumer box isn't unnecessarily large, noisy and consuming a lot of wattage.

    But I wonder: can the same kind of reduction in form factor here be converged with all the efforts being put into making server blades that fit gobs and gobs into rack mount chassis?

    It would be great leveraging if the technology used to make the single computer consumer box were the same technology used to make high density server farms.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  107. Form size? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

    Isn't most of the size of our MBs for expansion slots? Cutting them out isn't really a big innovation.

    I WOULD like to ask tho, in this age of miniturization, why are there so many chips on our MBs, and capacitors etc.

    Can't they integrate it all to a handful of chips?

    I mean, why does my sound card have a dozen capacitors?

  108. Times, they are a changin' by black6host · · Score: 1

    "We'd use some standard volatile RAM, probably just cache, to store things we don't want people to look at, particularly. So if the DRM stormtroopers grab your box, the evil bad MP3s get wiped wihout hope of discovery when you hit the panic button."

    That's what they want you to think. That panic button will probably transmit your volatile RAM to some secret agency (or megacorp marketing group) in 2005 :)

  109. Low Power!!! by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    A 200W powersupply? Are you kidding me? VIA's Eden platform is ultra low power! The CPU doesn't even need to be cooled by fans. I think a 60W powersupply would be enough, if you had a low power harddrive, such as a solidstate CF HD... or one of those low power platter based drives.

  110. Product description for those cases by leighklotz · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Product description for those cases by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      The one linked to is an NLX case, but if you look at the left side you can select the 1300 series which I'm using...

  111. the only portable solution I like so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agree with billmaly, very nice little tiny mobo, but I also want "a REAL chip (P4/Athlon)", AMD inside in my case.

    I've been searching long time ago for a portable yet powerful PC. Right now I'm stucked with a Joyance steel Wallmount ATX chassis (two 5.25" external bays, one external and one internal 3.5"), a Sony SDM-N50PS 15" LCD screen, and an IBM space saver keyboard (with an integrated pointing stick, I won't buy a keyboard without an integrated pointing device, I don't like mice nor touchpads). Now this is not portable, just smaller than similar solutions.

    I don't think there is nothing really powerful nowadays below the microATX form factor.
    After more than two years websufing for something really portable with a capable CPU, 512MB of RAM and a big hard drive, the only thing I like is the BSI FieldGo-M5 series rugged portable lunchbox computer.
    http://www.bsicomputer.com/portable/pcatxm5/pcat xm 5_intro.htm

    It ports a 15.1"LCD and even has an optional rubber membrane keyboard. I have an obsession to ultra protect keyboard and screen, so I would add a keyboard globe and a 3M filter. The integrated HulaPoint pointing device is a cool one, most lunchbox computers have keyboards with an integrated touch pad (don't like 'em at all).

    It would be perfect if the keyboard had backlighting like this one has (SL-86-911): http://www.accesskeyboards.com/tipilluminated.htm

    It is a beautiful rugged aluminum black box that holds a micro-ATX motherboard, there I could accomodate my Athlon.

    And now the BIG problem: I don't think there is a barebones deal (just the chassis with keyboard and screen), I just mailed them asking so but I have few hope.
    If I found a barebones deal like that for about $1500, tomorrow I would sell my Sony LCD and my ATX motherboard, and would get it with a microATX mobo. A nylon carrying bag, a built-in UPS 250W, maybe an AC/DC Battery 160W (hehehe, not much battery time there, I can live without it), and on my way to portability without those horribly limited&closed notebooks.

  112. Re:Slowing down already... ./ effect by Cheetah86 · · Score: 1

    The ./ effect? Maybe if you're trying to execute the page, otherwise I'd go for the /. effect.

  113. damn, there is an ATX model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry about the link (it got a blank space in it), I'll use href this time, here it is again: FieldGo M5 Me dumbass, I just found there is an ATX model, the FieldGo R9. Holly S, that way I wouldn't have to sell my actual ATX motherboard, I could even dream about upgrading later (much later) to a double cpu one (would 2 fit in?, I think so). Anyway I don't think there is a barebones deal, I'm not buying anything else. Why would they make an expensive and sophisticated case and then load it with expensive unsophisticated components?. Yes, of course. Nite all.

  114. MP3/DVD/DivX/Arcade emulator for car by Alehandro · · Score: 0

    I was looking around to get something really small. Found one from Cellcomputing. But it was waaayy to expensive. about 1200$. So 300$ is not that bad.

  115. Smaller still... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    The SaintSong motherboards... for example, the TX2: http://www.saintsong.com.tw/english/products/mb/tx 2-e.htm

  116. Re:Uh, it's not that small -- and it's old news :) by Reziac · · Score: 2

    I have some old 386 mobos that are about 6" on a side. What am I bid for these small wonders? :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  117. May buy something like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd like to see the following features:
    • Digital flat panel out. What's the point of a tiny computer if it drives a huge monitor?
    • PCMCIA - I want expandability, without the bulk of PCI. What's the point of a 170cm x 170cm motherboard if the machine has to be several times that large to accomodate an expansion card?
  118. Re:Heatsink? What Heatsink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    >C3 doesn't really require that much cooling, and could probably cope with a smallish passive heatsink stuck on with thermal adhesive.

    I've sold C3 integrated motherboards (and, other than heat generation, nothing has changed with the cyrix CPUs, IMHO). These processors require approximately the same cooling as a 486. A larger passive heatsink would probably be fine, but the boards I sold had what at first look appeard to be a 486 CPU fan.

    If you want a cheap board with a small size, 100% integrated, mostly linux supported, cheap (in all ways), and availiable now, seek out the PCChips M787. It is VERY similar to this board, just 2 slots bigger. Plus it fits in ATX cases and uses a trickly of power supply. The fan is almost inaudible, so this is an awesome home-entertainment mobo.

    But really, its cheap in all senses of the word. Don't say I didn't warn you!

  119. All the small things... by DarkRecluse · · Score: 1

    Its no wonder that Geeks are notoriously bad with women when you consider that we are interested in things that are smaller and smaller than their counterparts...shrinking "things" are not something women are interested in...explaining why smaller "things" are better also is not something they are interested in...how appropriate that this is from the its so cute dept...haha;)

    --
    --"It's Bradford Company, slash your last name, dot your first name"
  120. Where do I get a case for it ? by Wirr · · Score: 1
    This sounds really nice. Ideal for building a living room PVR - with a satelite dvb card in the PCI slot.


    But where do I get a case for this thing ???

  121. For those who don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't buy a VIA motherboard. Random crashes with FAQs which point to changing every single component in the system ("we don't know"), soundcards which beep in your ear with voicecomms and ending up in a situation that you are too afraid to change a damn thing in your system less your online match in 3 days time in threatened...

    (Can you guess I made a mistake when upgrading my system, ok, its windows, but I haven't had so much trouble since SCSI clone cards)

  122. Great for Lans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These type of small systems would be grat for lan gaming etc. Now if i can just find the right type of a light monitor to go with it.

    Can anyone recommend a light 17'inch monitor good for network gaming? (How are LCDS nowadays?)

  123. Yrp, but it would pump 300 Mhz... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a good Real Time Kernel (Hello Qnix) would make it much more powerfull than anythong Nokian can do.

    Just... well, batteries...

  124. Penis Size? by alapalaya · · Score: 1

    Theorem: 1 - 170mm (17 cm) is more or less the average length of a penis. 2 - The designer of this m/board think it is very small so: 1+2 => all the designers are John Holmes' childrens.

    --
    667 The Neighbour of the Beast
  125. Great!, now how about small, quiet power supplies? by helo2u · · Score: 1

    I'de love for PC to become small enough so that the keyboard can contain the computer, kind of like the C64/128