Slashdot Mirror


Attack of the Clones Leaked

dgris writes "ain't it cool is running a purported review of Epidsode II. Harry Knowles is claiming to have gotten a secret screening of the film while at the South by Southwest festival in Austin, TX. Short story: he loves it." Like the department sez: I'll believe it when I see it. After Phantom, I'm willing to wait a bit to see it.

306 comments

  1. Yeah uh-huh. by Romancer · · Score: 3, Funny

    And the publicity from this review is accidental too.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  2. Naaah... by rudib · · Score: 1, Funny

    He didn't see the real movie. It was probably just a stupid clone, only one among tens of thousands :)

    1. Re:Naaah... by nookieman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I was just browsing through the film-schedule looking for interesting stuff when I found this

      5:15 PM - Counterfeit Film

      hmmm. Maybe it's a hint, or maybe it was just

      7:30 PM - Made-Up

      anyway I'm real sad that I don't get to see

      2:00 PM - Sean Connery Golf Project

      If that's not a box-office hit, I don't know what is (and I don't).

      --
      sigfault. comment dumped.
  3. omg by Apreche · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Look at the stuff that gets slashdotted these days. Can't you tell when someone has made up something based on the trailers they saw? I mean come on.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  4. Wow! by Wind_Walker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What? You say this guy saw the new Star Wars movie well before it was supposed to be displayed publically? And he has proof of this?

    Wait, you mean he has no proof? You mean he gives no sources for his information? You mean everything he says is peripheral information about the film that could have been gleaned from the trailers? You mean that there's no reason to believe that this is real?

    I'll also wager that tomorrow, we'll see a Slashdot story detailing how the review was "forcably removed" from the site by Lucasarts (who will deny any involvement, because they're not involved) and "pirated" copies of the text will circulate around the 'net, hyping up an already overhyped movie.

    This is not the review you are looking for. You can go about your business. Move along.

    1. Re:Wow! by Nailer · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is not the review you are looking for. You can go about your business. Move along.

      This isn't the movie I'm looking for. I can go about my business. I'll move along now...

    2. Re:Wow! by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait, you mean he has no proof?

      I just got done reading the article, and you're way off base here.

      Occasionally, some reveiwers on AICN seems liek they haven't really seen the movie. But this is Harry, the proprietor of the site. And after reading the entire review (which you clearly did NOT), it's highly probable that he has seen the movie.

      The details of the fight scenes between Yoda and the Count. The insight into Anakin being a "mass murderer."

      Trust me, he's seen the movie. And if you hadn't been in such a rush to get karma points, you might have read the article and posting something REALLY insightful.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    3. Re:Wow! by javert · · Score: 1

      Lucasarts could well be the instigator of this review. They leak some fake review, pretend to forcably remove it, allow "pirated" copies of the text to circulate around the 'net, hyping up their already overhyped movie.

      How's that for cheap marketing?

    4. Re:Wow! by erasmus_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh please. Harry Knowles probably sees more prerelease movies in year that I will in my life, just because that is his business and he has a ton of industry connections. He would not post a review to lie to people, it's not like he needs even more readers. Why does a slightly advance review of a hotly anticipated movie bring the cynics and doubters out of the woodworks? Now if only I could get to the actual site to read it.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    5. Re:Wow! by Wind_Walker · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I did read the entire review, and before I posted.

      Anakin being a mass murderer? He never says it happens in the film. Hell, I could have told you before Episode I that Anakin is a mass murderer.

      Yes, he gives (possible) details about the fight between Yoda and the Count. But who am I (or you, for that matter) to say that he's right? I've seen the picture of Yoda that he mentioned. Just off the top of my head, I though of this: "And you've seen the CD cover with Yoda holding the lightning? Well, in the movie he gets shocked by Count Dooku, but the lightning never penetrates him, it just leaps around his body. Yes, he's that powerful with the Force. The Yoda holds out his hands and the lightning gets coallesced into a ball, which he then sends out into space, since Jedi Masters never use the Force for harm."

      See how easy it is to fake a review? I might write one up tonight, pulling my information from fansites (I knew about Yoda's battle months ago) and from ignorant Slashbots (I'll let you figure out who) and post it!

      Oh, and I don't need Karma, I'm at the cap.

    6. Re:Wow! by BoBaBrain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      General comments along the lines of "Ani is dangerous" and "Ben is cool" don't give much away, but Harry does describe one or two small scenes which were not in any of the trailers. "Jar Jar lets the jedis (2 Jedi, 1 Jedus?) into a room" can be verified. For the moment, my money's on Harry.

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
    7. Re:Wow! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'll also wager that tomorrow, we'll see a Slashdot story detailing how the review was "forcably removed"

      Given that this is Slashdot, it probably will say "forcably."

    8. Re:Wow! by prator · · Score: 1

      I don't always agree with the reviews on AICN(I think Harry was involved a little too much with LOTR to give an honest review), but these guys have helped to bring some cool stuff to the Austin area along with the Alamo Drafthouse. And they're usually a very solid source of information.

      -prator

    9. Re:Wow! by spaceland · · Score: 0, Troll

      Harry is known for pulling obnoxious stunts for publicity. I wouldn't be surprised AT ALL if he in fact did NOT see the movie he has proported to review.

      He claims to get personal showings of features from Hollywood executives that fly him all over the world. These are vivid dreams he has... In reality he's just an obese loser from Texas that will do most anything possible for attention, he's got serious problems. I actually asked one of those executives myself if it was true, he laughed out loud NO WAY, then that quickly turned into anger over Harry's ability to get away with this stuff. It's always amazed me that so many people believe the mindless blather he spews.

      I worked for a company years ago that sued Harry, it ended up not going anywhere for a variety of reasons. But when we were all done the FACTS WERE CLEAR, Harry Knowles simply FABRICATES his own hysteria because he thrives on the attention. This fact has been backed up numerous times over the years by many friends in the industry, including a very influential industry email-list administrator. He has absolutely zero respect within the industry. Aint It Cool is more like a house of cards, it will all come down sometime (the sooner the better).

    10. Re:Wow! by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3

      See how easy it is to fake a review?

      Fair enough, but I've been reading Harry Knowles' previews/reviews for four years, and every one that he has written has been factually correct.

      From what I can tell, some of his "anonymous sources" may fabricate material, but Harry does not. Whether you agree with his rather sophomoric presentation style is irrelevant to the actual descriptions of events in the film.

      When the movie comes out in 60 short days, and some of these heretofore "un-leaked" facts are revealed, we'll see. :)

      Oh, and I don't need Karma, I'm at the cap.

      Me too. It's just en vogue to accuse people of Karma Whoring. :)

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    11. Re:Wow! by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2
      Is it really only 60 days until Episode II hits the big screen? Man, time flies when you're playing video games. I guess I'm just naturally skeptical of anything that seems too good to be true. I also didn't know about this guy's history, and have since been corrected.

      So, maybe he's right, and if so, I'm looking forward to the movie. I don't think that I'll camp out, or see it on opening night for that matter, but I'm sure I'll get around to seeing it soon enough.

      Me too. It's just en vogue to accuse people of Karma Whoring

      Look! Your original post is at +5! Karma Whore!!!! (I always try to keep up with the latest trends) ;-)

    12. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah he's seen the real deal...trust me.

    13. Re:Wow! by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Well, he was on set for LOTR, I believe, and for various Robert Rodriguez movies. I mean, they had pictures of him with RR, if I recall. So it's not _all_ hype. He also has been profiled in many industry magazines, it seems like if what you say was true, those stories about him would include the negative comments as well.

      And don't say people were afraid to come out and say these negative things in public, because Premiere recently did an extremely negative piece on "Arnold" that made them catch flack from various studio heads, the Terminator himself and James Cameron. If they aren't scared of those people, they aren't scared of some web site guy, so why not reveal this stuff in print?

      It seems really unlikely that he could just make up interviews with famous directors, because he could, and would be called on it. I think your "friends in the industry" are just people who don't like him, perhaps with good reason, perhaps not. But there are others in the industry who seem to like him okay, or at least enough to put up with him (maybe so they'll get better reviews).

    14. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out, the Illuminati is after you...

    15. Re:Wow! by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, I'm at the cap too. Have been since they put the cap in. Trouble is, it was so much fun gettting to the cap, that is' hard to stop. :)

      --
      - Dan I.
    16. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you're that geeky that you even care about Episode II, I have a spoiler for you... Anakin is Darth Vader!!! YES IT IS TRUE! The dark lord is none other than that cute cuddly little kid from episode 1.

    17. Re:Wow! by TrevorB · · Score: 5, Funny

      The details of the fight scenes between Yoda and the Count

      What, are Henson and co. running out of muppets or something?

      One! Two! Three!!! Three Jedi Hah hah hah hah!

    18. Re:Wow! by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 1

      OK, now *THAT* was funny. :)

      I did, of course, mean Count Dooku (Aka Darth Tyrannus)... but "The Count" from Sesame Street conjures up some seriously funny parody ideas!

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    19. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm positive the review is real. I got the same negative reaction when I read their review about the new Babylon 5 pilot, months before the official airing. When I was it, it was tho exactly the same as described. From this time I think they really see the things before reviewing it.

    20. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't the movie I'm looking for. I can go about my business. I'll move along now...

      Oops. Nailer accidentally stumbled in to a thread about a movie he doesn't care about and, oops(!), scored a +5 funny!

    21. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My penis is long and stout
      If you're a man, you can try it out.

      I don't like girls.
      Not their tits,
      Nor their curls.

      I'm a Slashdot kind of guy.

      Come close and lick it.
      Bend over and I'll stick it.
      Where the sun don't shine.

      I'm a Slashdot kind of guy.

      Call me a fairy.
      My balls they are hairy.
      Sniff them with your snout.

      My penis is long nd stout.

      I'ma Slashdot kind of guy.

    22. Re:Wow! by MeNTyFReSh · · Score: 1

      Im surprised you were even able to read it... I went to the link and almost started to go into convultions from the damn text

      --

      "Eat right, Exercise daily, Die anyways."
      http://www.10angrygamers.com Where purple monkeys attack!!

    23. Re:Wow! by wolvernova · · Score: 1
      This guy has a lot of people coming to his site and has a reputation (allbeit amongst mostly fanboys). He had plenty to say about it, which means that either
      a) he saw it
      b) he dug up some lesser-known info on the net
      c) he made it up

      Is there anyone that had already heard everything he said about it? Knowles is sparing us some spoilers here, so I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt; mosty because we won't be able to disprove him, but also because I'll be able to form my own opinion on it when it comes out.

  5. is it valid? by monotone · · Score: 0

    and how would anyone be able to validate whether the 'review' is real or not? I scanned through it and did not see any strikingly new information. I wonder how difficult it would be to write a fake review.

  6. Aint it cool = don't it suck by jack+deadmeat · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I don't think Ain't It Cool has ever posted a review of anything, just the usual fanboy slobbering.

  7. [snooooore] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You guys run this same story every month about someone claiming to have seen the movie, or have a script.

    1) Its just a freaking movie
    2) After the last one, I'm not sure why you're so eager to be disappointed.
    3) Stop acting like 15 year old fanboys.

    1. Re:[snooooore] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I have to agree. What the hell is up with Star Wars and geeks? I mean, yes, there's the sci fi element, and yes, Star Wars used to be a good, epic series, but Episode I was a *bad movie*, the series has been merchandised to hell, and Lucas is an arrogant SOB. I mean, I wouldn't mind seeing Episode II, but I sure as hell don't care about it more than any other movie that I might just see on a boring weekend.

  8. doesn't _really _ say much does it.. by mark_lybarger · · Score: 0, Informative

    STAR WARS EPISODE TWO: ATTACK OF THE CLONES early cut review

    I saw Star Wars Episode Two: Attack of the Clones hours ago. The ?how? of that will be a thing of mystery buried in a passed piece of paper from my book signing with a hotel, a room number and a time listed upon it. You don?t want to know about that room or the person(s) in that room, you want to know about Episode Two.

    Jar Jar Binks. Jar Jar has a 15 second StepInFetchIt shuffle speak routine he does as he goes to first let Obi Wan Kenobi and Anakin Skywalker into the Amidala?s quarters that is so offensively awful, that it will not only make you recoil in horror, but it will remind you of all of the worst aspects of his character from THE PHANTOM MENACE. I wanted to burn the film, destroy, maim and murder it at this stage. I was steeling myself from the impending incompetence, the horror of my childhood being molested. I was prepared to have a very bad time.

    I found myself not liking Anakin Skywalker at all, he?s a punk spoiled brat? A snotty nosed ego trip, that angry evil high school football quarterback that wants the head cheerleader. He whines like a Mark Hamill squealing about going to Toshi Station to get some power converters. There is much anger in him. He?s impulsive, conflicted, out of control and a mass murderer. Everytime I saw him and Natalie Portman together, I wanted to tell her to run, fly you fool. But am I not supposed to feel that way?

    So did George Lucas drop the ball? Did he rape our childhood? Has he turned into nothing more than flannel wearing toy salesman without a soul or an eye for storytelling anymore? Was I disappointed to such a state that I wanted to yell and scream and break my original 12 inch Boba Fett and defecate upon it in a ritualistic purging of all that was once sacred to my childhood?

    To answer all of those questions?. THANK GOD NO!!! Lucas succeeds with the film beyond my wildest dreams.

    I was scared and thrilled to be watching Episode 2. The entire time I was in that hotel room, I was convinced that agents of Lucasfilm were going to knock down the doors and I knew I was being set up for a fall. I mean, it isn?t possible to see STAR WARS early. I know that, but there I was watching it. Listening to the sounds of drunk SXSW revelers falling into the door outside.

    After about 20 minutes of that awareness everything but the film ceased to exist. The lights in the room dimmed in my mind. The person(s) in the room shrank like Scott Carey into the microverse. Everything about me was concentrating upon the film. The movie was not complete. There were moments where the effects were quite rough, but the work that was finished, was beyond reproach.
    How do I explain the success of ATTACK OF THE CLONES? First, I must say that this film makes THE PHANTOM MENACE a better film. In fact, I would have to say that not only does it do that, but suddenly you will realize with horror, exactly why Jar Jar Binks is in the series at all. Upon first viewing, in less than ideal circumstances, I must say that I feel that this is by far the most entertaining Star Wars film to date. It may not have that innocent sense of wonder for the first film. It doesn?t have that sense of intimacy that EMPIRE STRIKES BACK had, or that film?s desperation. However, it also doesn?t have the trivial frivolity of JEDI or MENACE. ATTACK OF THE CLONES is a turning point in the saga. The point of no return.

    I love this film desperately. I want to continually watch it for about a week with my best friends. I want to see it digitally projected with sternum shaking sound. I want to watch as friends discover the twists that Palpatine/Sidious/Dooku have in store for us. I want to have the conversations about what this all means, the speculative conversations about how these elements will play out in the final chapter of the prequels.
    What is great about the film?

    Obi Wan Kenobi / Ewan McGregor. He just owns the role now. There is a moment in the Cantina/Sports Bar on the surface level of Coruscant, where he and Anakin have chased an assassin. As they enter this packed sci-yuppie-scum club, they realize they can?t seem to be able to see ?the assassin? anymore. Anakin wants to rush in, tear the place apart looking for the suspect. Obi Wan tells him to slow down or something then turns to head in a different direction, Anakin asks him, "Where you going?" to which Kenobi dryly responds, "To get something to drink." Kenobi is just that calm about things. He is the king of cool. He?ll get his suspect, but he?s going to get a drink first. Priorities. I was reminded of him telling Luke to let go and to trust his feelings. He doesn?t repeat that here, he simply lets go and trusts his feelings. We see it as an action, a path he chose. Then when he gets to that bar, leaning on it, sipping that odd drink, a drug dealer comes up to him and asks, "Wanna buy some deathsticks?" Obi Wan responds, "You don?t want to sell me death sticks." Drug dealer says, "I don?t want to sell you death sticks." "You want to go home and rethink your direction in life," Kenobi continues. "I want to go home and rethink my direction in life," the dealer says as he blankly turns and walks out of the club. Before he can get too smug about his little trick he senses the assassin behind him and he pulls the patented Obi Wan pivoting light saber at a bar strike that you?ve seen in the trailer. He gets his suspect and he?s never broke a sweat. He is the master. Kenobi is just plainly cool in the film. Watch how he handles things on Camino or the way he doesn?t betray a single thought in his conversation with Jango Fett there. He knows his game, his methods and his ways. He is confident and completely on the clock. Ewan is relaxed in the role, clearly having fun and is very very very good in the film. Contrary to Moriarty?s assertion that he would be more ?Han Solo? he is in fact much more Master Li Mu Bai (Chow Yun Fat from CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON) but without the romance.
    Jango Fett ? Boba Fett / Temuera Morrison ? Daniel Logan -- I love this pair. I love them because they are the renegade Father and Son. They have their own set of rules, they are a self contained functioning unit. Jango wanted a son to raise his own way, that doesn?t mean he beats him and does evil things. He loves his kid. He?s training him to be a good Bounty Hunter like he is. There is very much a father/son ? Master/Apprentice style thing going on here. And they have my favorite moment of the entire film, which is a tiny little moment between these two. Jango and Boba are headed to Genosia when they pick up that Kenobi is tailing them. They dive into the asteroid belt surrounding Genosia, Obi Wan trails behind them, not being lost. Jango tells Boba something like, "Prepare the sonic mines, we?ll give him?" something, I couldn?t make out? but Boba presses some buttons while doing what I can only describe as an evil giggle? a delighted giggle. Jango looks at him smiling, as if to say? "That?s my boy!" The moment is so honest and real. I?ve never seen a father ? son moment like this in science fiction. Completely classic.
    Anakin Skywalker - Padme Amidala / Hayden Christensen ? Natalie Portman -- First Anakin is just an ass in this film. Like I said earlier, I can?t stand him. He?s like that boy in the TWILIGHT ZONE movie that has too much power and thinks about using it too much, but sometimes it goes terribly astray. Portman?s Padme in this film has mostly dropped the ?high speak? that she had from the first film?. Injecting into her character far more vocal variety than the droll monotone of the first film that killed the performance. Here she infuses the character with more of herself, which is a very good thing. I like that she doesn?t want to have anything to do with Anakin. That she constantly is aware of all the reasons they shouldn?t be together. Of the scandal. Of their careers. Anakin hates being told no. She can see all the reasons, but when they go through what they go through? When the emotional binding takes place between these characters through a brief adventure, a loss of a loved one, a decent into hell? When faced with certain doom, they realize that life is too short to worry about the ifs and buts? And when it happens? John Williams? love theme kicks in. This really kicks in just as Anakin and Padme kiss before being taken out and strung up in the arena (you know the sequence when they are chained against the pillars.) It actually starts from the shot (which we see in the trailer - of the arena with all the Geonosis creatures seated and cheering - the long shot looking from high to low). It consists of maybe three instruments playing at first, classic violin, very sorrowful and warm. It almost sounds a little bit like the theme for the Incredible Hulk TV series with Lou Ferrigno. The intros are similar before other instruments join in. It also reminded me of Francis Lai?s theme from Arthur Hiller?s LOVE STORY. Although it is strikingly different from other parts in the film, IT FITS IN BEAUTIFULLY. Elegant but not soppy. Gentle but not melodramatic. Williams thinking differently (after all, a very different relationship from Han and Leia!) and succeeding. It starts to crescendo as the lovers are wheeled out into the arena (reminded me of the shot of Luke with the twin suns) - same type of crescendo. It continues through the cuts between Obi-Wan chained and them being taken over to the same place but changes into a military drum style (you know, the thumping dictatorship heavy beat - almost like the 'sacrifice has arrived'). This changes the whole tone as we realize their 'moment' has been intruded and they are in serious poodoo. The romance is handled in terms of familiarity and proximity. This is that sort of romance where one loves the other, but only at the point of an emotional precipice where the other could see that they shared that feeling and embrace it. I liked this.
    Palpatine-Sidious ? Count Dooku-Darth Tyrannus / Ian McDiarmid ? Christopher Lee -- Wow. Ok, read no spoilers about all of this. I remember thinking that Lucas could be soft in the head for trying to fool the audience into thinking Palpatine isn?t Sidious. I mean we can see that in the credits. What the hell? Right? See that is so like a self-centered audience. To sit there and think they are the center of the universe. The Palpatine-Sidious thing from the first film? The trade dispute? All of it not only makes sense with this film, but the way it unfolds. As you see the point of the various guises and names? How Yoda and Windu sense no ?disturbance? around Palpatine? There are reasons for these things? Just because you don?t know them yet, doesn?t mean Lucas doesn?t know what he?s doing? Upon seeing this film, seeing how he handles these two characters being 4 characters? It is genius. Compelling Machiavellian positioning and deception. There are points in this film where I wanted to scream at the screen and say, "Palpatine is an evil Sith Lord! They?re conspiring to destroy the Republic from within!" That?s when Christopher Lee essentially tells Obi Wan the same thing? My god. The evil. The evil of using the truth, knowing it could only be interpreted as being a deception and a lie. The Devil uses truth to betray mankind, because he is expected to lie? and the truth sounds better, but will never be believed. Just wait till you see how the Death Star plays into this? You?ll friggin die! FANTASTIC.
    Yoda-Dooku fight? HOLY GOD! Right now there is a lot of speculation about Yoda with lightning. It is on one of the soundtrack covers. When you look at that. When people described the ball of lightning in Yoda?s hands from ShoWest, I thought they were insane. I thought only the bad guys did that. When I saw the film, well? I can tell you exactly how that moment plays out. So far as I have seen that hasn?t leaked and it isn?t a huge spoiler. When Yoda and Dooku first set up to go at it, Dooku hurls lightning at Yoda? Yes, Chris Lee?s character is that strong. Perhaps the strongest character with the force I have ever seen in Star Wars history. He attacks Yoda with lightning, Yoda captures it, twirls it around, balls it up and redirects it back at Lee. When I saw this, I screamed like a little girl. I mean it was like Uncle Tony grabbed my pantied ass. I jumped about 12 feet up in the air and squealed. WHAT A THRILL! The Yoda ? Dooku fight is astonishing. I can not emphasize that enough. I have been thinking for quite some time that there was no way on earth that Yoda with a light saber could look cool. Folks, not only does it look cool, but there will be a collective scream of HOLY SHIT when what happens happens. Yoda?s fighting style is? well let?s just say he could kick all your asses. Oh and by the way, Williams? DUEL OF THE FATES was nothing in comparison to this. Remember Vader vs Luke in EMPIRE? How overwhelmingly powerful Vader felt in comparison to Luke. Remember how weak Vader felt in comparison to the Emperor? Now imagine someone with The emperor?s powers in a full on battle with a master. Here towers of metal are torn asunder with the power of the force. The ceiling ripped apart. Seemingly unlimited strength with the force. You will quiver, shake and scream. You are warned.
    You have to understand something in going into this film. What you have seen in Star Wars movies before were skirmishes? incidents? Remember, The Battle of Hoth was small, a minor hiccup. In ATTACK OF THE CLONES, you have the first REAL Star War. It isn?t a space battle, but you understand the scale of things. The size and scope of a MAJOR OFFENSIVE. And unlike in PHANTOM MENACE, where Lucas decided to cut up the action by trying to intercut three consecutive arenas of battle, here he portrays the action linearly? basically following Obi Wan and Anakin and Padme? who all basically stick together, with Padme taking a roll in some sand to miss out on the Dooku battle.

    After the film was finished playing I was just beside myself with glee.

    Right now it is a very interesting time for Star Wars fandom. PHANTOM MENACE polarized the audience into the faithful and those that felt it had all gone wrong. That everything was doomed. With the introduction of MATRIX and LORD OF THE RINGS into fan circles, there began to be a real angry mix. Fights, screamings and hurling of ?love it or leave it? style rhetoric.

    Watching the trailers for STAR WARS: ATTACK OF THE CLONES in theaters, the audiences seemed muted in comparison to the delightful screams of approval from the SPIDER-MAN trailers.

    You know those guys that have been camping up in Portland? The experience they are going to have in the theater upon that first showing? They will be so completely happy.

    Now the cut I saw was still a bit rough around the edges, but folks? I can?t wait to see this on the big screen complete. To see what gets cut, what gets changed, what I notice when watching this movie the way Lucas meant for people to see it.
    The source(s) that showed it to me were tired of all my LORD OF THE RINGS stuff. They were tired of all the rhetoric about Tolkien, all the focus I had on LORD OF THE RINGS. They wanted someone outside of the ranch, outside of the ?circle?, someone that seemed to be straying from the fold to see what it was that Lucas had done. What Lucas has done, is to make a film that is so relentlessly entertaining and thrilling, that there will be no movie this summer that can stand against it. This is it.
    This movie is the real deal. It is smart, beautiful (god digital photography is the glory and the future of the world of film, the palette is strikingly dramatically colorful), thrilling and electrical. Essentially it is a pure action adventure science fiction fantasy with a touch of romance. Line up now. This Star Wars is for real.

    P.s. To the talkbacker concerned about Jimmy Smits... He doesn't really do anything major in this film. He is next to Palpatine though right before that amazing shot of all the Clone Troopers and those Star Destroyer things... So he's close to Palpatine, but I bet he betrays Palp in the next one (speculation) Oh, I'm off to Los Angeles, so I won't be doing talk back looking on this to answer questions, but if you come to the book signing at BOOK SOUP Tuesday at 7pm, I'll answer all NON-SPOILER QUESTIONS about Episode 2. In fact, I'll even do imitations of scenes and looks on faces. I'm so jazzed about this movie now! Can't wait to share, but not spoil!!! The gods of spies have looked out for me on this one.... That sacrificial Power Puff doll was worth it!

    1. Re:doesn't _really _ say much does it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      i wonder if the "reviewer" woke up in a bath tub filled with ice, and missing both his kidneys... >:)

    2. Re:doesn't _really _ say much does it.. by nookieman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yoda Says: Optimise JAVA code by inlining methods you can. Optimising slashdot karma by inlining article you cannot.

      --
      sigfault. comment dumped.
    3. Re:doesn't _really _ say much does it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, at least it's not all in a huge fucking 72pt font like the original.

    4. Re:doesn't _really _ say much does it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're exaggerating.

    5. Re:doesn't _really _ say much does it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, OK... 71pt.

  9. Grain of salt, but don't dismiss entirely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of weird shit happens at SXSW. While at first I'd be quick to dismiss something like this, stranger stuff has happened at SXSW (i.e. big name bands like REM and Green Day playing cameo shows in no-name bars) and pretty much all the big movie execs are in town to check out some of the new talent. I've lived in Austin for 3 years, and SXSW is when all the really strange "I can't believe that happened" stuff happens. Now, this guy could just be talking out his ass, but I wouldn't dismiss him totally. Lots of under-the-table stuff happens at SXSW, so even if someone said Jesus Christ had come to earth to play a show at Emo's, I wouldn't flat out dismiss it. Anyway, I'm curious to see how Ep 2 turns out, so I guess the only way we can know if he's telling the truth is to wait for the damn movie. ;)

    1. Re:Grain of salt, but don't dismiss entirely by niftyeric · · Score: 1

      I agree, weird stuff can happen at SXSW. I watched a movie about the Street Fighter Tournament scene, need I say more (it kicked ass though)? ;)

      I thought Jesus played at Stubb's?

      --
      proton != antielectron
  10. Damn Mat Drudge To Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mat Drudge has gone to far this time.

    May he burn in hell!

    1. Re:Damn Mat Drudge To Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps. But even in hell, his grammer will no doubt be much better than yours.

      And more importantly, he'll fully understand the difference between:
      to
      too
      two

    2. Re:Damn Mat Drudge To Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      grammar.

  11. Not exactly a big secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Anybody there would have seen this. Some guy had a second-generation VHS smuggled out of Lucasfilm and he was showing it in a tent. Anyway, it really isn't a bad movie even if it is just more of Phantom-style slapstick... as typical for this franchise, a lot of new characters and creatures. The main one is a large green ogre-like thing that lives in a swamp and really values his privacy, and then the Emporer forces a bunch of others into his area so he's sort of forced into the battle... another princess, just like episode 4... impressive effects with a flying monster that breathes fire... Jar-Jar is unfortunately back, looks a little different in this one. Not enough space war and too much singing IMHO but your mileage may vary.

    1. Re:Not exactly a big secret... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Wow, is Jar Jar going to be voiced by Eddie Murphy this time? You just decribed the plot line of Shreck.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    2. Re:Not exactly a big secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you captain obvious!

      I am sick and tired of you damn overly-literal geeks ruining a good joke. sheesh.

      As for the original post, +4, funnee!

  12. Haha. What some people will do to get visitors! by qslack · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How come this reminds me of The Onion's Ask A High School Student Who Didn't Do The Required Reading?

  13. probably not... by marcro · · Score: 1

    seeing as they didn't finish TPM until almost a week before release, I'll bet that whatever cut they saw was *not* the final edit...

    1. Re:probably not... by bje2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      did you even read the article??? the person clearly states several times that they are *not* claiming to have seen the final cut...only a rough cut... that said, i still don't believe it...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  14. imho - BS. by mooZENDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TBH the review sounds like it's been written by a 15 year-old script kiddie. Just look at all those BUZZWORDS that he's put in there. It's probably me, but it all sounds like so much bulls*** :/

    --

    ---
    "An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind" - Gandhi
    1. Re:imho - BS. by EvilAlien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ain't It Cool News *ALL* looks like its done by a stoned 15 year-old script kiddie. For a site this consistently awful it sure does get a lot of attention.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    2. Re:imho - BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Episode II will be so drastically different from what he described that this will make him lose any and all remaining credibility. May isn't that far off...

    3. Re:imho - BS. by flewp · · Score: 1

      What are you saying? It ISN'T cool? NOOOOooooooooooooooooo.

      sorry.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  15. Gungans in the last trailer by rrdejay · · Score: 1

    Were those gungans fighting in one of the land battles. I didnt get a good look but they had the floppy ears.

    --
    Gone but not... ummm
    1. Re:Gungans in the last trailer by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      No, they were Geonosians, the winged creatures of the rocky planet featured in the end of AotC.

      --
      --- witty signature
  16. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice this story hasn't been published on www.whofuckingcares.com.

  17. pretty reliable... by dioscaido · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been a follower of Harry for many years. When he was an unknown, he was a fantastic source for Episode I rumors. Now that he is 'famous' his connections have increased exponentially, and I find their reviews and rumors to be pretty reliable. I don't doubt he got to see it. A months ago they had a full script review and, surprise, the newest trailer confirms what they wrote. As to whether its any good, I have to agree with a previous poster that many reviews are more fanboy slobbering than reviews, but I'm a fanboy so I usually aggree with what they say!

    1. Re:pretty reliable... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Mmm, all true, but the big issue that I have with Harry is that everybody else in the entire business has to buy for their access by writing positive reviews. Harry wants us to believe that he's different, because he started out different.

      But the special access he gets now, teamed with the apparent inconsistencies of his tastes, the increasing number of rave reviews of big films (I know he likes movies, but even so...) and if nothing else the plain old fact that his site is sponsored directly by the owners of the films that he is reviewing (and AOL-Time Warner, I notice) mean that the only reliable information that you can get from Harry's reviews is an insight into Harry.

      I really is a damn shame. AICN used to be a great site when Harry did things the hard way. But as soon as it started attracting enough eyeballs for Harry to start receiving legitimate invites, it effectively removed the point of its own existence. In fact, I mostly just read it now for the trolls, who tend to be a lot more amusing and vitriolic than the goober subspecies on Slashdot. ;-)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  18. Re:Full text of article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) it's not /.'ed yet
    2) someone beat you to it
    3) they actually got the formatting in a readable manner

  19. Re:Haha. What some people will do to get visitors! by bje2 · · Score: 1

    i agree...this article is sufficiently vaugue that i question whether the author saw the "sneak preview"....i found that there was very little information (if any) that you couldn't get from watching the trailers and reading star wars internet rumour/fan sites....

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  20. You know, by yellowstone · · Score: 5, Funny
    When I saw this, I screamed like a little girl. I mean it was like Uncle Tony grabbed my pantied ass. I jumped about 12 feet up in the air and squealed. WHAT A THRILL!
    When people say "too much information", this is exactly what they're talking about.
    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    1. Re:You know, by KilljoyAZ · · Score: 1

      If you think that was bad, you should read his Blade II review.

      --
      This .sig is currently on hiatus for retooling.
    2. Re:You know, by fatbastard10101 · · Score: 1

      Dude, when he reviewed Rollerball or something he spent like two paragraphs on how he was banging some woman dressed up like catwoman on the hotel bathroom floor.

      I nearly lost my lunch.

  21. I read an article somewhere... by JPriest · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...that said allot of review sites don't have time to watch all th movies and review all the products, so they will sometimes just grab some basic info on the product/movie and completely bullshit the review just for the sake of having a review published on that particular product. I am not saying every review site/group does this, just that it happens more than most would expect.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:I read an article somewhere... by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And your evidence that this happens "more than most would expect" is that you "read an article somewhere"?

      Way to stamp out those charlatans, chief.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    2. Re:I read an article somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it was a guy on slashdot a while back who actually talked about this friend of his who had read this article. But he seemed like an honest guy!!

    3. Re:I read an article somewhere... by davmct · · Score: 1

      so THAT is how Jon Katz gets his reviews... I always wondered if he ever really did go to the theater or not.

  22. durr durrrrrrrrr dur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the same douchebag who claimed to have a copy of the script as well, and was raving about how fantastic the movie would be just by this lame script? I get the impression that this is either a) a Star Wars fanboy who just thinks SW is the greatest thing ever, b) being paid by Lucas to hype this dungheap, or c) trying to get more hits on his site to show more ad banners to generate more $$$. Most likely a combination of the three.

    Even if it is true, WHO FUCKING CARES? Stop posting star wars stories unless the headline is "New Trailer Released" or "Episode II Now In Theaters". Any "news" other than those is completely irrelevant, stupid, and the hype will only serve to make the film even more of a let-down.

  23. To the naysayers... by billmaly · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's Lucas' story. Jar Jar or no Jar Jar...it's his story to tell. When you raise a bajillion dollars in capital, then you can make and tell your story on the big screen. Until then, STFU.

    1. Re:To the naysayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I would tell you where to shove your remarks, but this is such obvious, stupid flamebait that it's not worth the trouble. So long, Troll-boy.

    2. Re:To the naysayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya exactly. Sometimes i wonder do star wars fans even like star wars? they constantly bash it...Episode 1 sucks, Return of the Jedi sucks ass, Empire Strikes Back was corny, etc...

      It's like if you think they all suck why the fuck are you a fan then?

      Real star wars fans love all of them...the rest of these people are either bandwagon jumpers or confused yuppies trying to relive their childhood.

    3. Re:To the naysayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars sure does suck ass. I was never a fan.

  24. Harry Knowles has zero credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Leaked copy" my cowardly yellow anonymous ass. "Planted copy" is more like it. Lucas is obviously scared by the success of the LOTR and Matrix franchises, and is desperate to drive up those opening weekend grosses (since that's all the big-budget movies really care about anymore), so he's pandering to the fans he drove away with "Phantom Menace" by having Knowles rave about "Clones" on the internet. Don't forget that Knowles is the same guy that raved over Phantom Menace, raved over the Emmerich/Devlin debacle Godzilla, raved over Armageddon and even admitted liking Battlefield Earth before later retracting the positive review. He's the go-to guy for studios that want to target the geek demographic, because he's the Mikey of the cinematic world.

    (He'll also print anything on his tabloid website without bothering to fact-check in any capacity. I tested this once by making up the most outrageous thing possible and sending it to him in a drunken fit - do a search on aintitcool.com for "mammoth".)

    1. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by jgerman · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Ummm, why would Lucas make a good version of the movie to get someone like Knowles to rave about it and then release a shitty one in theatres?

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    2. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm pointing out the flaw in his reasoning is now considered flamebait? Numb fuck moderators, though it's probably the same 15 year old kid who posted the original modding down poeple who point out the problems with his ridiculous posts.

    3. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the logic flaw? Nobody said Lucas made a good movie just for Harry to see, what was said was that KNOWLES RAVES OVER EVERYTHING. Specifically, everything "geeky". If it's sci-fi, fantasy or comic book related, odds are Knowles will crank out a glowing review. He's what carnies would call a "mark", which is, not-so-oddly enough, the reason why he mysteriously gains all-access passes to studio sets and advance copies of every spec-fic movie months prior to its release. The litany of terrible movies that he's screened before official release and praised to high heaven is long, and in hindsight frequently hilarious.

      But hey, if you trust the rantings of someone who recently compared Guillermo Del Toro's directing in Blade 2 to skillful cunnilingus in graphic detail... if you trust someone who gave massive thumbs-ups and the occasional months' worth of hype to Godzilla, Independence Day, Armageddon, Blair Witch Project, Blair Witch Project 2(!), A Knight's Tale, etc. etc. etc... that's your prerogative, OK? I'm sure your $8 is exactly the type of ROI these studios are anticipating by investing so much time and energy in catering to Knowles.

    4. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at any recent Entertainment magazines (I mean the dead tree type) This guy Knowles is in almost all of them, they hail him as the god-sun-king-litmus paper of the internet movie marketting industry. The most hilarious one I saw was in EW, where Knowles is painted as a fat blonde haired british monarch with electrodes connecting him to the net and execs begging him to revew or hint on their movies.

    5. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Ummm, why would Lucas make a good version of the movie to get someone like Knowles to rave about it and then release a shitty one in theatres?

      I'm guessing so he can release a special edition with more footage in 10 years and re-milk money from all his lemming fans just like he did with the last star wars trilogy.

      Star wars fans are great -- I just wish I could figure out how to get such a following. I can just see all these people running about me saying "Here's money! Make one more! I don't care about the plot! Gimme more of it!". I think I'd pull the fans strings too...

      Fortunately, I only rented EP1 (couldn't find it on the net for long enough to download it via modem) and I don't plan on viewing any more of it unless its equally (or lower) priced.

    6. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by jgerman · · Score: 2

      So wouldn't that enhance his credibility as far as seeing the movie, since that was the question here whether or not he saw a pre-release, or leaked copy?

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    7. Re:Harry Knowles has zero credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His seeing the movie was never questioned. Could you kindly read posts carefully prior to replying?

  25. Longtime AICN reader by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know Harry personally, but I'm a long-time reader of AICN. IMO, Harry's got a lot more integrity than that. I would find it very hard to believe that Harry faked a review.

    1. Re:Longtime AICN reader by malducin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well don't know him either and I don't care much for this review. But talking about Knowles, AICN and integrity, well that might be a bit of a stretch. Do you remember the OScar debacle from a few years ago or his apperance on Politically Incorrect. You should read the articles on Film Threat about him and some of his associates:

      DECONSTRUCTING HARRY: AIN'T IT UNETHICAL? (part one)
      THE GEEKS STRIKE BACK: DECONSTRUCTING HARRY (part two)
      AIN'T IT CRIMINAL: DECONSTRUCTING HARRY (part 3)
      AIN'T-HE-A-FOOL: JUDGMENT DAY FOR JOE HALLENBECK
      AIN'T IT BACKLASH: HARRY GOES ON TV, BUT TV GOES OFF ON HARRY
      HARRY & ME

      I mean if is willing to pimp a script from one of his friends without telling anyone, it's abit of a stretch to talk about integrity and his site. Maybe instead of begging for presents he should put ads like Slashdot.

    2. Re:Longtime AICN reader by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think he has the cahunas to fake something like this either.

      As for him liking it - well, remember, he LOVED the US Godzilla movie too. It wasn't until he saw it a 2nd time several days later that he saw it as a big-budget craptacular.

      Me, I'm not going to see Episode 2. Jar-Jar, 'n Sync, another whiny bitch chosen to play Darth - in short, signs that George learned all the wrong lessons from Phantom Menace. Not even a metal bikini could save this thing.

      --

      Moof!

    3. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N'Sync isn't in the movie. I haven't seen Jar Jar in any trailers, either.

    4. Re:Longtime AICN reader by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, I'm not going to get into a lengthy defense of Harry because, like I said, I don't know the guy. However, just reading that first article you linked to is SUCH A BLATANT HATCHET JOB BY A COMPETITOR that it's downright silly. I mean, one of their points against AICN is (and I quote), "Really bad writing". Huh?!? Is that proof of his lack of ethics or proof that FilmThreat despises AICN? (Probably the latter.) In another part they blast AICN for using psuedonyms like Moriarty and Elektra, saying that "they might be studio hacks," but then a few paragraphs later go on to identify Moriarty as Drew McWeeny, an AICN staffer. So, which is it? Is Moriarty a "studio hack" writing puff pieces or an AICN staffer? (Everyone at AICN knows he is the latter.)

      The fact that the half-dozen tirades you linked to all came from FilmThreat tells me that they have an axe to grind. Probably they are just trying to siphon off users from AICN.

      Quite a sad way to build an audience.

    5. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look closer, Jar Jar is most definitely in the trailers.

    6. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple members of 'n Sync are also in the latest trailer. They're some of the myriad of nameless Jedis in the background of a couple shots.

    7. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brave AC. Too bad Jar-Jar is most definately there. Some Star Wars droid hasn't been paying very much attention.

      Afraid your nose might change from it's usual brown hue? Don't worry, George has plenty of other morons to suck up to him and tell him how great every steaming hunk of shit he serves up as a Star Wars movie is.

    8. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice smear campaign.

    9. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, one of their points against AICN is (and I quote), "Really bad writing". Huh?!? Is that proof of his lack of ethics

      It's not proof of his lack of ethics, but it is true nonetheless. His writing is really really awfull. I read a lot of crap on the web, and his really takes the cake on the number-of-readers vs. total-crappiness scale. And that goes towards credibility too.

    10. Re:Longtime AICN reader by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Nothing agiast the fine staff here, since it adds to the mistque, but does anyone else find it ironic that someone is criticising bad writing on slashdot?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    11. Re:Longtime AICN reader by malducin · · Score: 1

      I do agree with you partly, I also don't know Knowles. Probably the truth is somewhere in the middle. Even though Ron Wells says he doesn't have an axe to grind it sure doesn't seem from the way he wrote it. He could have just stated the facts and given an analisys but his tone really doesn't show much class. I'm sure it did bring traffic to the film threat website. Still many of the facts were reported in many other places, they might still be archived at ABC, Variety or other publications, like the Oscar debacle, or the fact that he receives a lot of gifts from the studios, or the stories of receiving or viewing stolen studio property, and for what, for having a powertrip of being the first to review them. There's a reason why Ebert didn't let him go back as guest critic after Siskel's passing away. Many of the facts reported there or elsewhere were basicly undisputed by him just given the runaround. He might have started as a rebel but now seems to be part of the machinery.

      Knowles might not be evil. If anything he seems either very immature or like a politician, in the sense that they have screwed up but don't take responsability for their actions or apologize for anything. He has done many good things like exposing how studios sometimes really mess up movies, butchering them or how flawed the pre-screening process is. He was a pioneer. As someone with such high profile you would hope that he take the high ground, explain or apologize and then go on. Maybe he is a lot smarter than he appears, having us all fooled ;-). My intention is for people to read and form an opinion. Personally I think he might have seen it, no reason to lie (unless he knew someone got the scoop first). It might have been planted even without him knowing, by the studio or LFL. I guess the only thing I had objection is calling him full of integrity, though on re-reading you post you actually said more integrity (0.1 being more than 0 ;-). I used to read it a lot back then, and on rare ocassions check it out, but I would jut hope the his antics, real or perceived, would change for the better.

    12. Re:Longtime AICN reader by Stormie · · Score: 2

      In another part they blast AICN for using psuedonyms like Moriarty and Elektra, saying that "they might be studio hacks," but then a few paragraphs later go on to identify Moriarty as Drew McWeeny, an AICN staffer.

      ..and let's face it, if your name was "McWeeny", you'd use a pseudonym too!

  26. Wasn't It Cool News? by the_rev_matt · · Score: 2

    People still pay attention to that site? I thought they'd been completely discredited when Harry admitted to accepting gifts in exchange for pre-release hyping of crappy movies.

    When it first started gaining popularity (or at least when I first noticed it) circa 1998, I found it to be juvenile, fan boy garbage and almost entirely apocryphal or at least wildly innaccurate (to quote D Adams). I'm glad to see it hasn't changed. I'll stick with hollywoodbitchslap.com, myself.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

    1. Re:Wasn't It Cool News? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      When it first started gaining popularity (or at least when I first noticed it) circa 1998, I found it to be juvenile, fan boy garbage and almost entirely apocryphal or at least wildly innaccurate (to quote D Adams).

      I'm glad to see you think so highly of it. Sortof reminds of a geek gossip site in a way. Even if he has 'connections', his style is disturbing at best.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  27. Harry is full of shit. by Picass0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He probably saw it. I won't argue that.

    But his opinion is crap ever since he claimed that he "cried at the end of Armagedeon". What a sell out. They were his site's biggest sponsor at the time.

    I shit you not.

  28. Had an effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I must admit, after reading that drooling review, I am more interested in the movie. I love the original series, but hated TPM. This doesn't mean I'll actually see it in the theater, but it does make me think twice about it. Lucas is a great film maker, even if TPM wasn't up to everyone's mammoth expectations.

    The original treatment of star wars was on the order of 300 pages or so. For those who haven't had the pleasure/pain of writing a script treatment, a treatment of 20-30 pages usually ends up a 100-150 page screen play. Most movies that are around 2 hrs tend to be 110-130 pages. In theory, the treatment lucas wrote was a true epic in the traditional literary definition. Now I don't know if the original treatment really was that long, since the information was from a biography show about lucas. I'm sure there's some exaggeration, but given that lucas spent a very long time writing star wars (years), it is likely we are judging with only partial information. Lucas was the one who thought of Indian Jones and other good films. Before I jump down his throat for clone wars, I'll watch it first.

  29. Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sad to tell, anyone who's followed Harry's fortunes over the years has seen him metamorphosise from a rebel outsider into a minor celebrity, feted by both individual directors and (gasp) Big Bad Studios just like any other influential mainstream reviewer. Even now, Harry still (very occasionally) gripes about mainstream reviewers, while at the same time accepting the exact same special access to sets and screenings. The only difference is that Harry explains exactly how the whole sordid business works, with reviewers buying themselves celebrity status by giving good review-bites that guarantee that their name will go up on a poster or trailer, thereby elevating them into more expensive and high class whores. And yet despite receiving the rewards, Harry would like us to believe that he is still untainted by the influence and can be trusted. This idea seems to flow from the fact that Harry explains the context behind each viewing (whether you want to hear it or not) and writes informally. It's superfically convincing, but the style of presentation is irrelevant other than for entertainment value, it's the substance that matters for a reviewer.

    I am simply unwilling to believe the spy-games circumstances that Harry claims. If he has seen this film, it is with the full sanction of Lucasarts, on the implicit or explicit understanding that he would give it a rave review, and that he would imply that it was a rogue showing. And note carefully, he leaves us to infer that by describing his feelings (which nobody can prove or disprove), but never actually makes a factual statement to support it. You have a think about that.

    Don't get me wrong. Perhaps it is a good movie and an honest review. But Harry can simply no longer be trusted. There are just too many examples of him raving about movies to which he has received special access for him to be a credible independent reviewer any more. I won't claim he has sold out, because he never claimed to want to be outside the system. In fact, he has made every effort to insinuate himself into the whole sorry cycle of review-reward, and I think this may very well be his crowning glory.

    Sorry Harry, you used to be someone I could trust. Now you're just a shallow parody of Comic Book Guy. The circle is complete; now you are the studios' bitch. Ain't it ironic?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by EvilNight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have to understand Harry in order to get the substance from his reviews.

      Harry has a deep seated and pathological NEED to absolutely love every film he watches. His desire for this is so strong that within about 15 minutes of viewing a film he will find the proper mindset in which to view it. (Mindsets being in this case the point of view that one should approach a film with in order to obtain the most enjoyment from it.)

      Harry has never once pretended not to want or use the "special access" and preferred treatment he gets from studios. Heck, he delights in it far more than any other reviewer I've ever seen, like a kid at christmas. That's part of the game. The one thing Harry does do is incinerate films he doesn't like, special screenings be damned. Just look at his review for Rollerball 2000 if you want a prime example. Out of 10 movies he gets "special access" for, 1 is awesome, 2 are good, 5 suck in one way or another, and the rest he never reviews since they are a waste of time.

      The only real problem you get reading Harry's reviews is that sometimes it's just not possible to get into the mindset he does to enjoy a film, so you end up with Harry giving a good to glowing review for a movie that to a non-film geek is a pile of crap (Godzilla 2000 for example). He's gotten better at knowing when this is happening lately and you'll find his reviews peppered with "If you don't like x you'll hate this" or "If you like y then this is a lot like it".

      And get off with this betrayal thing. I get far, far better reviews from Harry and Moriarty on AICN then I do from all other film sites combined. You're coming across as a bitter old school AICN poster who feels robbed because he went to see a movie that Harry recommended and couldn't get into it. No reviewers are right all the time. Feeling betrayed for eight bucks is a little dramatic. It's like all the punks who think they were betrayed by Green Day when they ditched the punk rock, and all the old slashdot posters whining about how much the site sucks nowadays.

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
    2. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of people are complaining like you are, but yours was the first message I read so I'll reply to it.

      You people seem to have the same mentality about movies as you do software. If it comes from a big company with a big budget it must suck. I don't understand that, but I don't have to.

      The thing I find interesting about your comments on harry is that you don't compare a good review from harry to whether the movie turned out good. You compare it to whether he had special access.... Who cares if he had special access to the film. What is important about a reviewer is if his/her reviews are accurate. Or, more to the point, accurate to the way you see things.

      It is great to find a reviewer that seems to reflect your tastes, and if the one you are reading doesn't then don't read them.

      I don't understand people who hate something and keep subjecting themselves to it just to complain.

    3. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by CrackElf · · Score: 1

      "It's like all the punks who think they were betrayed by Green Day when they ditched the punk rock"

      Sorry, but green day were never punk rock, so they could not have ditched it. And this is why I never claim that they sold - out ... they were mainstream grunge kids from the get go. Much like your overly vaunted Harry, they were never alternative to the mainstream that they implied. my 2c.

      --
      "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
    4. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as Harry's credibility goes, one reason I have not questioned it is because he slammed a movie that he actually had a cameo in and is a friend of the filmmakers (Monkeybone). If there was ever an excuse to go soft on a movie, he had it here.

    5. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention harry's eviceration of rollerball. mctiernan (the director) let harry see an early cut of the film during a exclusive junket. harry proceeded to trash the film in the worst way in his review of the pre-screening.

    6. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by DThorne · · Score: 1

      I'm completely unfamiliar with the guy, which puts me in a good position, I suppose.

      It was as if the "review" was written by an overeager child - nothing remotely reputable in it. Please folks. Anyone using that many quotation marks can't seriously be expected to be anything other than a rabid fan.

      DT

    7. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by phriedom · · Score: 1

      "It was as if the "review" was written by an overeager child - nothing remotely reputable in it. Please folks. Anyone using that many quotation marks can't seriously be expected to be anything other than a rabid fan." As a long time AICN reader, who stopped reading it a while ago, I would say your first impression is quite accurate. The writing is terrible. The reviews are often either gushing or caustic. Harry can be an ametuerish fanboy. Now wrap your melon around this: People Like It, though I can't decide if it is despite or because of those reasons. My personal opinion is that, like slashdot, much of the traffic is there for the TalkBack.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    8. Re:Sorry, but Harry lost his credibility years ago by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • You're coming across as a bitter old school AICN poster who feels robbed because he went to see a movie that Harry recommended and couldn't get into it

      Mmm, I did give that impression, but it's not at all true. I don't spend that much time on AICN, I've just been dipping into it for years, and reading the reviews casually. I only see movies based on personal recommendations from friends, never based on professional reviews. My point is that Harry's stories (I won't call them reviews) have gone from enthusiastic but informative to pure solipsism, where the entire point seems to be to get across exactly how inside Harry is. See the bizarre story of Blade 2 for a perfect example.

      Sure, Harry is perfectly honest about his subjective ramblings, and he's never less than entertaining, but just because you like his style doesn't mean that you have to give credit to his substance.

      It's like a politician announcing a tax rise; you'll probably get an anecdote about how badly the money is needed, and how much the polician regrets doing it, and so on. All of this is perfectly true, but perfectly irrelevant; the only salient point is taxes are going up. Similary, Harry can write five hundred words about how hyped he was, or who invited him, or what he had to eat that day, or how hot the chick in front of him was and how much she wanted to ride his 400lbs carcasse like a bucking bronco, but that's just spin. The beef is: what was the movie like. And I'm finding that increasingly Harry just doesn't say, although he's becoming better and better at covering that up.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  30. What is the fascination..? by popeydotcom · · Score: 1

    With going to see a movie the day it comes out? I just don't get it. Inflated prices, queues.. packed cinemas.. Why not just wait a week? Is it the chat-by-the-watercooler thing? Am I missing out? Probably not.

    1. Re:What is the fascination..? by Kibo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I know why I sometimes make an extra effort to see a showing on the first day.

      Watching a movie on your tv and in a theater are obviously different experiences. But there is one really key difference. Seeing it in a theater is a community experience. When you know a movie is really good and will just rock you, it is a very different experience seeing it last show of the first night and a week or so later. Out in seattle there's a bunch of cinemas, maybe not the most by land area or population, but there are a lot. Most of them are near good, and occasionally cheap restaraunts and even near by. Some, like the most excellent Cinerama are not. The better the movie, especially on a friday night the parking can be brutal. And standing outside in the crisp night air, possibly getting rained on, for hours on end looses its charm just as quickly as one might imagine. But it's worth it. The people who are there understand that it is an event and they are invested in it. A setting like that is almost enough to make you cry during Pearl Harbor. No, not for that reason, stop being so cynical.

      Basically, it's the same reason people put chocolate sauce on ice cream.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    2. Re:What is the fascination..? by Detritus · · Score: 5, Informative

      One reason to see a film early in its run is the quality of the print. The print degrades with each showing due to scratches, wear and breakage.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:What is the fascination..? by RayChuang · · Score: 2

      Personally, I think unless the theater screen have things like THX sound certification and the new Kodak projector certification, not to mention more comfortable seats with better sightlines, the theatergoing experience is not exactly going to be popular--not when evening shows are hitting the US$10 per person ticket price. Now you know why Syufy Enterprises built the Century 25 Union Landing complex in Union City, CA and the Century 20 Great Mall 20 complex in Milpitas, CA, with more coming over the next few years in the San Francisco Bay Area.

      Now, I'm hoping that Syufy will close and completely remodel the Century 16 Mountain View complex is that too becomes THX-certified. :-)

      --
      Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    4. Re:What is the fascination..? by Jaycatt · · Score: 1

      I dunno, there's just something about being in a theater with a bunch of people who haven't seen the film. No one's talking about "oh, check this out" or "I didn't get that the first time". People are genuinely *interested* in seeing the picture (they put up with the long wait, they're not going to interrupt as much). Also, it's great when a whole theater laughs, or claps, or jumps at the scary parts. If you go a week later, most of those people are on their second showing, and hence the audience isn't on the "same page". I never knew how important this is to watching movies in the theater until I finally went to a first showing, and noticed that the audience actually brought a lot to the film... A lot more than you get just sitting at home with no "participation", that is!

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    5. Re:What is the fascination..? by Alt_Cognito · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except that this viewed was digital, and won't degrade.

    6. Re:What is the fascination..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While AtoC was "filmed" with digital cameras, there are just not enough theatres for it only to be shown on digital projectors. The vast majority of the theatre going public will be viewing a transfer of the digital to conventional film format, and these prints will degrade just like all the other movie prints. You should be able to see what theatre(s) have DLP projectors at the following:

      http://www.dlp.com/dlp/cinema/where.asp

      (though it should be noted that just because a theatre has a DLP projector doesn't necessarily mean they will either show AtoC or that if they do, they will be using the DLP projector to do so, or that if they do, that they won't also be showing a film version of it on another screen(s))

  31. Funny.... by Kibo · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems like something, once upon a time, someone would have said about Sony.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  32. Harry needs another spanking by Demona · · Score: 4, Informative

    Guess the first and even the second weren't enough for him.

    --
    Fuck Slashdot
  33. Can I say FAKE!!!!! by BaddMatt · · Score: 1

    Hey, I go most of what he said from the trailers and other videos on Star Wars' website. He told us nothing new except what he added to try and make it look real.

  34. Lets get some facts by count_dooku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, people, reality check:

    1. The film isn't done. As is typical with effects-laden material, there are still many shots that are not "high-res" yet.
    2. Why in the hell would anyone at Lucasfilm be attending the indie South by Southwest convention? Are we to insinuate that someone other than Lucasfilm has a cut of the movie?

    There is no doubt that some people have seen the movie. But this was just a rough cut. If Harry said that he was screened a rough cut, maybe I would believe him. The fact of the matter is, there is nothing is his review that hasn't been leaked in the spy reports on TheForce.Net, or in the "scriptament" that is floating on the Web.

    --
    For the book says, "We may be through with the past, but the past ain't through with us."
    1. Re:Lets get some facts by fluor2 · · Score: 1
      No. There might be pre-released movies out. The changes left are just cosmetic. Like when Lucas have a nice day and looks at the movie, he says "This robot doesn't really have to be killed". So they re-render the scene, but the story is still the same.

      BTW i'm of course not saying that the review was an authentic article.

    2. Re:Lets get some facts by thesolo · · Score: 2
      If Harry said that he was screened a rough cut, maybe I would believe him.

      From the end of the review:
      Now the cut I saw was still a bit rough around the edges, but folks...I can't wait to see this on the big screen complete. To see what gets cut, what gets changed, what I notice when watching this movie the way Lucas meant for people to see it.

      He says right then & there that he was not viewing a final cut of the movie. Most likely, this will be like TPM, and not be complete until just before it hits the box office.

      I'm not saying the review is true or not, but he does say it's not the final cut.
    3. Re:Lets get some facts by jonerik · · Score: 1

      Why in the hell would anyone at Lucasfilm be attending the indie South by Southwest convention? Are we to insinuate that someone other than Lucasfilm has a cut of the movie?

      Well, SXSW hasn't been a strictly indie affair for several years now. It's now the music biz' answer to Cannes and Sundance: A great place to create a buzz. Traditionally, yes, SXSW has been about music, but considering that Universal, Dreamworks, Sony, etc. all have film *and* music interests, it wouldn't surprise me at all if someone from Lucasfilm was there.

    4. Re:Lets get some facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      particularly if they knew that harry knowles was going to be there. and that the whole point was for lucasfilm to "leak" a rough cut of the film to him.

    5. Re:Lets get some facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the way, ever since moriarty posted his review of the aotc script on aintitcoolnews and ever since the private showings of aotc footage at showwest a couple of weeks ago, harry has been publicly begging for someone to show him some episode ii goods. looks like someone at lucasfilm granted harry's wish.

  35. Re:MICROSOFT BANNERS ON SLASHDOT? by ethereal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well, it's not like they were impartial before, right? Now they just have an opportunity to be partial in the other direction. Kind of mirroring Anakin's fall to the Dark Side, if you will :)

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  36. I Doubt He Saw It by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are many simple reasons why, if Ocaam's Razor were applied (and without any lubrication whatsoever) to this.

    While I suspect that Harry has read of things from the movie (of that, things are leaked like crazy: visit http://theforce.net for lots of stuff), it is HIGHLY unlikely that he's seen the movie in its final form. Why?

    Because, according to LFL, the movie still has a lot of post-production work (the CGI) to be done. In fact, the latest preview is missing a few key pieces...watch the last scene where 14 Jedi are on their last stand, surrounded by a lot of aliens and battle droids. Funny that the Jedi are reflecting blaster shots which come from nowhere.

    The movie isn't complete. I checked my ass--it seems that someone has been trying to blow smoke up it.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by neolith · · Score: 1

      So, did you miss the fact that Harry himself said up front that the movie wasn't in final form? Look, Harry has done some asinine things, and his reputation for gushing over any piece of celluloid he sees needs no further comment here. But Harry has NEVER fabricated a review. Ever. So, take the review, minus the hype, and its still pretty informative. There are things in the review that haven't been leaked before (Obi-wans interaction with the deathstick pusher, for one) that will be easy to verify come opening day.

      --
      Like my comments? Try my podcast: http://www.baldmove.com
    2. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While I suspect that Harry has read of things from the movie

      Yeah, like the script, which he reviewed.

      it is HIGHLY unlikely that he's seen the movie in its final form

      Except that he's never been shown to be a liar before, so why risk it now?

      Because, according to LFL, the movie still has a lot of post-production work (the CGI) to be done. In fact, the latest preview is missing a few key pieces...watch the last scene where 14 Jedi are on their last stand, surrounded by a lot of aliens and battle droids.

      Perhaps that is why he said this in his review:

      The movie was not complete. There were moments where the effects were quite rough, but the work that was finished, was beyond reproach.


      Aside from that, if you actually applied Occam's Razor as you claim, the simplest explanation is that he DID see the movie. Not that there is this major conspiracy for him to write a fake review.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by JatTDB · · Score: 2

      I hate Occam's Razor. It's really quite useless.

      What's simpler, he decided to write a fake review based on information already available (scripts, preview, etc), or that some Lucasfilm goons dropped a secret note to him at a book signing, directing him to go to a certain hotel room at a certain time (Would YOU take such an invitation from a stranger? Sounds like a recipe for an asshole-widening you didn't ask for) to give him a super-secret viewing?

      I'm not making any claims one way or the other...I've never read this guy's reviews before (or if I did, didn't really notice the author), and I'll go see the movie when it comes out. But be careful with Occam's Razor...it's really all in *how* you state the options. Just about anything can be phrased such that it sounds simplistic, and just about anything can be broken down into its basic elements (plus the occasional dash of paranoia) and sound horrendously complex.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
    4. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can see the blaster shots in the end scene of the trailer.they arent easy to see, and may just be placeholders, but they arent deflecting imaginary blasts..

    5. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by CapnRob · · Score: 1

      But ... dude ... he *has* been shown to be a liar. Remember the time he claimed to have hacked into the Oscar-results database, only to have to admit later that he'd just looked at a file on an ABC.com FileMaker server with *their* guesses as to who'd win?

      Or how about the time he took a scoop from Coming Attractions, pulled off who it was addressed to, and ran it on his site as an exclusive AICN story?

      Or, hell, how about the time he claimed _Armageddon_ was a good movie?

    6. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the script, which he reviewed. Actually, it was Moriarty that read & reviewed the script, not Harry.

    7. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by clarkgoble · · Score: 1

      He said he didn't see the film in its final form. He said he saw a rough cut. I'd expect that a lot of FX shots aren't done, color adjusted, etc.

    8. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by gfevans · · Score: 1

      blaster shots coming from nowhere ... you dont say now that i think about it they were probobly coming from dissatified star wars fans after seeing phantom

      --
      outside of a dog a book is man's best friend inside of a dog it's to dark to read -groucho marx
    9. Re:I Doubt He Saw It by weston · · Score: 1

      I hate Occam's Razor. It's really quite useless.

      Well, not useless, maybe. But not perfect, because simplicity is a value judgement, and so relative simplicity can be too. Furthermore, simplicity can change depending on the symbolic system (language) used to express a concept.

      Still, I prefer to beleive the world I live in is actually there, rather than a huge simulation projected into my brain by a machine that wants to use me as a human battery....

  37. My prediction by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think one element overlooked by most of us in this series of prequels and even their effect on Ep4-6, is a small event in Episode I. This is not mentioned in the review the guy wrote but I am SURE that this will effect ep2-3 and I want to mention it none-the-less (so that when I'm right I can refer back to this post on slashdot ;-)

    Consider the conglomeration of 'Force' and 'Fate' that surrounds the events in these movies. Think about 'Destiny' and 'Prophecy.'

    Now consider that moment in Episode 1 where Qui Gon Jinn says that he will gamble the racing pod against the freedom of Anakin and his mom. Watto will only gamble against one of their freedoms and rolls the chance cube to see which. Qui Gon uses the force to ensure that it is Anakin whose freedom is gambled (and won) in the pod race.

    Now think about the results of Anakin being taken from Tatooine and going with Obi Wan. Think in the scope of all 6 movies.

    You see, the whole string of events that unfolded (will unfold) in episodes 2 and 3 plus ep4-6 that we've already seen are a result of this. But was it 'Fate' or 'Destiny' that made resulted in the chance cube rolling the way it did, or was it those things that made Qui Gon use the Force to free Anakin? Did Destiny guide the Force, or did the Force guide Destiny?

    I think George Lucas in brilliant in this, as sooner or later, we will all realise that only because of Destiny and the roll of a chance cube was an Empire built and defeated, the way of the Jedi preserved, and Evil defeated once more. That, my friends, is what can only be produced from the mind of a master storyteller.

    George Lucas, I applaud you.

    1. Re:My prediction by Sebastopol · · Score: 2

      But how much directional emphasis was put on the cube and Qui Gon's role? Way too little! That's where I think Lucas squandered the pivotal element of his entire six-work saga. don't you think Lucas should have developed Qui Gon a little more than just depicting a long-haired, somewhat rougish, police-cop? i mean, the entire empire is a result of his actions, to make him such a flat character seems to me like an actual lack of director foresight.

      imo: lucas is a better special effects directory than story teller. you made a really interesting observation so you might enjoy this: watch bergman's "seventh seal" and see if you agree how little time Lucas spent developing the characters. this exercise makes me see StarWars more like a soap opera than cinema.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:My prediction by niftyeric · · Score: 1

      It's funny, I've thought the exact same thing before, but I never could word it just right. Thanks. ;)

      --
      proton != antielectron
  38. Hypocracy by Wind_Walker · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It never ceases to amaze me how quickly Slashdot visitors forget their animosity towards the MPAA.

    We have countless stories proclaiming that the MPAA is destroying Fair Use, that they're devil spawn, that thousands of loyal Slashdot readers are boycotting the MPAA....

    But then, Star Wars comes out. Lord of the Rings comes out. Resident Evil comes out. And all of the sudden, you're forking over your hard-earned money to these devils.

    I have not seen a movie (aside from free TV movies) in the past year and a half. And I won't. I have scruples.

    1. Re:Hypocracy by matt2413 · · Score: 1

      Why should I pay to see the movie, when I have the wonderful internet "preview" system. :)

      Matt

      --
      Matt
    2. Re:Hypocracy by Lonath · · Score: 2

      I totally agree. I am advocating a boycott of SW, simply because geeks are such a large part of the audience. And, if you can boycott that, you can boycott anything.

    3. Re:Hypocracy by GospelHead821 · · Score: 1

      Also important is how you approach this situation. Do I disapprove of the tactics of the MPAA? Yes. I think that the blatant purchase of legislation that curtails my rights is wrong. However, I don't blame them. What they're doing is a good business tactic. I blame the US government for being bought. There are precious few companies, who, given the resources, would not purchase legislation to improve their standing in the market. However, it is the duty of the government (which is difficult, because the government is unfortunately composed of individuals) to overlook the money available and seek the proper course of action. I can't blame the MPAA for taking advantage of an opportunity that was made available to them. I can blame the government for poor upkeep of its duties.

      --
      Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
      Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
    4. Re:Hypocracy by Sauron23 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Since I can't mod this up. I'll simply agree.

    5. Re:Hypocracy by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      But then, Star Wars comes out. Lord of the Rings comes out. Resident Evil comes out. And all of the sudden, you're forking over your hard-earned money to these devils.

      Hey, where does it say in the review that Harry paid the MPAA for the the screening? Score one for our team!

    6. Re:Hypocracy by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't remember ever saying that I was going to boycott the RIAA or MPAA. Heck, I don't even remember a general consensus on Slashdot so far that said that the however many hundred thousand readers of Slashdot was going to boycott the MPAA.

      Heck, I don't see a general consensus on /. about ANYTHING! That's why it's such a great place for discussion - otherwise CmdrTaco would post an article, we'd all agree with it, and move on. No discussion would be had. Instead we have tons of people with diverse beliefs and ideas exchanging them. Sometimes it's meaningful, sometimes it's just a flamewar.

      Me personally, I go to the movies every weekend. I don't boycott the MPAA, because I know they will just use it for an example of how the "Evil Internet and P2P File Sharing Applications Are Killing The Industry". I spend effort instead with making sure people know what's going on, and contacting my Congresscritters (the people who make the laws that protect the MPAA), and encouraging others to do the same.

      I somewhat boycott the RIAA, but, if I download an MP3, like it an enjoy it, I buy the CD. No need to FURTHER fuck the artist. Bad enough they don't make much money from the CD I purchase. Again, I spend my efforts differntly, trying to change the system with what little noise I can make.

      I use both Open Source (OpenBSD and Linux) and Close Source (Windows 2000 and Amiga OS) Operating Systems. I write Closed Source applications, but, prefer Open Source tools (I'm a game developer by night, Industrial Automation programmer by day) I'm working towards the idea of decaying my games into GPL'ed code after a certain timeperiod so that others can continue to enjoy my games long after they have been released - but one of the important issues is making enough money to continue to make games, so up front Closed Source is an important issue. Long term, Open Source is also very important.

      Ok, why the rambing additional information that has nothing to do with the MPAA Boycott? To illustrate something - people on /. are different from each other. Not all of us represent the same thing. Not all of us post our opinions on every article, agreeing or disagreeing with what's said (in fact, if we did, no one would bother to get any work done since there would be something like 200,000 reponses PER ARTICLE. Ouch. And the /. servers could hardly handle it!)

      So don't stand up and make a blanket statment that all /. readers (or even editors. Yeah, it's rare that I stand up for them ;-) agreed to the idea of boycotting the MPAA. Or the RIAA. Or Microsoft Products. Or... anything. Because we are all individuals, with different ideas, and damned well don't agree on ANYTHING! ;-)

      --

      Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

    7. Re:Hypocracy by Wind_Walker · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Yeah, that's a good argument. "Because this reviewer viewed an illegally copied and illegally screened pre-release version of a film that's going to make millions, then he's a good guy!" Just because you like the movie doesn't mean that it's not illegal.

      You probably support the Napster-supported pirating of copyrighted music too, don't you?

    8. Re:Hypocracy by alexjohns · · Score: 3, Insightful
      First, it's hypocrisy. Second, there's about 750,000 unique /. readers on any given day. To think that we all have the same feelings about everything is woefully narrow-minded. Thirdly, we can disagree with something and yet still support it.

      I disagree with some things the US Government does and yet I still pay my taxes and vote, and at this point have no plans to emigrate. If I disagree enough, I'll write letters or email. The same with the MPAA. I see about 2 movies a year at the theaters and I rent about a dozen (aside from all the ones we get for the 3-year-old.) If they do something I don't like, I let them know. That doesn't mean I should stop giving my money to Ridley Scott or John Waters.

      Support the movies/actors/directors that you like. Let your elected representatives hear about your disapproval of them trying to hijack our culture's intellectual property. I watch independent flicks (on Bravo, IFC, Videos, etc.) and I support small-time independent music-makers, especially foreign ones like Wes and Saliif Keita. I don't buy 'produced' bands like N'Sync and such. Support the bands that spent years playing bars before they were discovered. Those are the 'real' musicians.

      That's really about all you can do. Boycotting can be an effective strategy, but I don't believe you're even on the radar screens yet. Perhaps if their control measures become more draconian there will be enough of a groundswell of support. Until then, I'll continue to consume in small, carefully regulated dabs of consumerism and let any displeasure be heard by my senators and congresspersons (who, really, actually, do listen, BTW.)

    9. Re:Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To which slashdot poster are you referring? Surely you know there are many people here. Some are pro-MPAA, some are anti-MPAA. So you can't be sure there's any hypocrisy unless you concentrate on an individual and show him having two faces. We already know that the Slashdot audience as a whole has two -- no make it a thousand -- faces. Show me the hypocrisy.

    10. Re:Hypocracy by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1

      More power to you, I admire your dedication to your goal.

      But you really can't complain that everyone else isn't doing the same thing. We want our consumer and fair use rights over media we purchase. So what's the point of having these rights if we aren't purchasing any media?

    11. Re:Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Industrial automation programmer? You ever use that POS InTouch?

    12. Re:Hypocracy by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      It's unlikely he got to see the movie without someone from Lucasfilm showing it to him. In fact, it's probably almost impossible, since ILM (owned by Lucas) is doing the Lion's share of effects. His comments about "spy stuff" are just him being dramatic.

    13. Re:Hypocracy by dlb · · Score: 1

      You people are all the same.
      You'll talk about boycotting and how bad the evil empire is, but in reality you'll be the ones waiting in line all night to see the movie opening day.

      You aren't fooling anybody.

      ~db

    14. Re:Hypocracy by kindbud · · Score: 2

      I haven't got a problem with MPAA members showing movies in theaters. I pay the ticket price, I get to see Ian McKellan on the big screen in the company of a hopefully enthusiastic audience. Fair bargain.

      I do have a problem with the way they are acting with respect to digital media and fair use. So I stopped buying their digital media, and I intend not to buy any until the fair-use-limiting features have been removed. That means I may not be buying the LOTR:FOTR DVD when it is released. But if the fair-use advocates win out in the end, it will be available on unencumbered media sometime in the future. I will buy it then.

      Until then, there is Morpheus, or whatever, if I really want to have the damn thing that badly. But I don't. The books are more than a fine substitute for the DVD, and they happen to be completely unencumbered by fair-use-prevention technology.

      I don't think I could stay awake to read a novelization of Episode 2, so there is probably no dilemma presented there...

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    15. Re:Hypocracy by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 2
      It never ceases to amaze me how quickly Slashdot visitors forget their animosity towards the MPAA.

      It never ceases to amaze me how many people assume Slashdot is a perfectly unified group of people who methodically push a particular point of view.

      Believe it or not, Slashdot does not have an agenda, especially if you include the visitors. If it had an agenda, it would be a heck of a lot more coherent.

      The destruction of fair use and expansion of copyright is something that interests lots of nerds, so Slashdot ("News for Nerds") covers. Star Wars is something that interests lots of nerds, so Slashdot (Still "News for Nerds") covers it. Some nerds are worried about copyright expansion and boycott the MPAA. Some don't really care and don't. Some feel that the best answer is somewhere in the middle. Berating Slashdot and Slashdot's visitors for be human, for being different, for not being perfectly uniform Slashbots is silly.

      I'm glad you've found your own solution. You're boycotting the MPAA's works. Great. You probably would like to convince more people to follow your path. Equally great. Perhaps you would attract more people if you didn't insult their behavior.

    16. Re:Hypocracy by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's a good argument. "Because this reviewer viewed an illegally copied and illegally screened pre-release version of a film that's going to make millions, then he's a good guy!" Just because you like the movie doesn't mean that it's not illegal.

      You probably support the Napster-supported pirating of copyrighted music too, don't you?


      In the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn, that's a joke, son.

    17. Re:Hypocracy by Nyarly · · Score: 2
      Yeah, that's a good argument. "Because this reviewer viewed an illegally copied and illegally screened pre-release version of a film that's going to make millions, then he's a good guy!" Just because you like the movie doesn't mean that it's not illegal.

      You probably support the Napster-supported pirating of copyrighted music too, don't you?

      Dammit. This probably qualifies as an off-topic troll, but I'm more than willing to take my lumps on this one.

      I'd really like to see this line of reasoning evaporate on Slashdot, for the simple reason that there does exist a difference between legality and morality. Feel free to argue the moral issue of intellectual property, its theft and fair-use, and the tit-for-tat nature of piracy as a response to overreaching corporate manipulation of intellectual property rights.

      Please do not argue that "there's a law against it" is one and the same thing as "it's wrong." Ideally, anything that is wrong should be illegal, but even that doesn't make everything illegal wrong.

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
    18. Re:Hypocracy by Zenithal · · Score: 1

      This is a little over-violent and self-righteous, but still kinda true too.

      On one hand, Slashdot is a news source and this is news for nerds.. no doubt about it. On the other, the opinions of the editors (or at least some of the editors) is fairly well known.

      Then again, reporting the release of these movies is hardly endorsing their consumption. Not any more than even a post about 'The evil RIAA did *'.

      How do you report the news about a product without promoting it?

      --


      Aaron
      AaronCameron.net
    19. Re:Hypocracy by Lonath · · Score: 2

      I know it will be hard to do this. But I will try. As I said, if I can do this, I can avoid anything.

  39. sad but true, and a question for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    After Phantom, I'm willing to wait a bit to see it.
    Truer words....

    It is sad that I must always (well, almost always :) tune my impatience out, in order to have a better end result. The entertainment industry rarely shows this, esp in the pc game industry. I really hope this one is good, and is in existence to entertain by telling a great story... NOT to make money and gather as large a market as possible by literally throwing in certain elements like goofy side kick type characters, a bit of sexual inuendo, spacecraft battle (cap and skirmisher/fighter), and some blaster action popped off with lightsabers and martial arts. If these happen naturally, great. But it was obvious in Phantom Markete that they were artificially added for mass market appeal.

    Now the question. Will each subsequent movie DVD release have a 'special' edition in which ONCE AGAIN Lucas claims that this time he 'got it like he wanted' and throws in another market plea (which sadly works) of anticorporate, anti-the-man and pro-freedom fighter elements of 'the suits/money was dictating blah blah blah, but now _I_ have the final say". (In case you didn't know... Lucas _IS_ the suit/money and _DOES_ have the final say from the very beginning). Either way... will each release including EP III, have a special edition, and then 2-5 years later will we have a Special Trilogy Edition? That too with 'extra footage' and 'digitally remastered' (used almost as much as 'Extreme' has been overused). Then 2-5 years after that, have a Special Epic Edition that is all 6 movies? Then perhaps 6 months - 2 years after that have a Special Star Wars Universe package that includes even the special Ewok and related childrens movies (which really includes EP I also) made for TV? I just wonder...

    1. Re:sad but true, and a question for the future by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      I s'pose you haven't heard he also intends to rerelease the Original Triology (again) as the "Archival Edition" with newly filmed scenes and elements - namely introducing the Emporer and Coruscant as early as A New Hope. I think that's why we're still waiting for the Original Triology on DVD.

      Why can't he just leave the damn thing alone?

  40. Harry Knowles is a big fat idiot by vorhese · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why do so many people love aintitcool? It's a godawful designed website. The fonts are huge, there are too many exclamation points, and Harry is a bought out tool for the movie industry.

  41. Death Sticks? by TechnoLust · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He said in the movie that a drug dealer approached Obi Wan and tried to sell him some Death sticks... I find it difficult to belive that George Lucas couldn't come up with a better name for a drug than DEATH STICKS! What did those annoying people at truth.com or whatever that play those anti smoking ads sponser this movie? Come on. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever read.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
    1. Re:Death Sticks? by kannen · · Score: 1

      I find it difficult to believe a drug dealer would be stupid enough to approach a Jedi knight with an offer to sell him drugs.

    2. Re:Death Sticks? by schwatoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah because the person who decided that 'the force' is caused by having a bad case of the mitochondrians should be renowned for his originality

      Mesir want some deathsticks?

      --
      I have trouble with passwords among other things.
    3. Re:Death Sticks? by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1



      If you think "Death Sticks" is bad, check out the name of the dealer: (from www.theforce.net)

      Elan Sleazebaggano - Unsavory Troublemaker
      Actor: Matt Doran
      Elan is a drug dealer on Coruscant who offers "death sticks" to Obi-Wan and Anakin. "

    4. Re:Death Sticks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it utterly ridiculous that anyone would even try to debate the point... go off to the corner and play with your light sabre kid, just remember what your parents told you about playing with it too much and going blind.

    5. Re:Death Sticks? by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obi-wan: No, thank you. The force is my anti-drug.

      Dealer: It's not a drug man. It's a performance enhancer. And a Gungan repellant?

      Obi-wan: A what? I'll take two cases.

    6. Re:Death Sticks? by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Perhaps they are used to power the Death Star... ok bad names, what about Death Star and Star Destroyer???

    7. Re:Death Sticks? by capologist · · Score: 1

      I find it difficult to belive that George Lucas couldn't come up with a better name for a drug than DEATH STICKS!

      Or a better name for the drug dealer than "Philip Morris."

    8. Re:Death Sticks? by samdu · · Score: 1

      Not more ridiculous than Nsync being in EpII.

  42. New subscription features by Sapphon · · Score: 1

    How 'bout we ditch Jon Katz and hite this guy? Better yet, hire this guy and get Katz to edit out the "I orgasmed in my seat at this scene" stuff, which shouldn't be too hard as Katz never seems to like anything....

    --
    Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.
  43. Yeah Right. by CCIEwannabe · · Score: 0

    The version he saw must not have had Jar Jar in it. I'll wait till May to make my opinion

  44. Yoda learned the Force from Goku and Mr Piccolo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>The Yoda holds out his hands and the lightning gets coallesced into a ball

    I can just see it now. A little green muppet with the voice of Grover from Sesame Street who hasn't learned grammatic structure:

    KAAAAMAAAAYHAAAAMAAAAYHAAAAAA!!!!!

    Of course, the actual fight scene occurs only after lots of grunting and talking to themselves.

    :-)

  45. Not necessarily hypocrisy... by GeekLife.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Possibly different people. Believe it or not, slashdot users are allowed to have different opinions from one another, even if it's rare to see them expressed.

    1. Re:Not necessarily hypocrisy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's CmdrTaco and the rest of the editors who post/agree with every anti-RIAA/MPAA submission and then fawn over every Disney/Lucas creation. Those are pretty explicit examples.

  46. Same thing goes for OPEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But then, Star Wars comes out. Lord of the Rings comes out. Resident Evil comes out. And all of the sudden, you're forking over your hard-earned money to these devils.

    And don't forget all of the folks who criticize OPEC's business practices, only to go out and drive/take the bus/buy plastics/eat food that was delivered in a truck. What a bunch of hypocrites.

    The shame here is that people love movies. They just don't love the unethical business practices of the cartel that produces them.

  47. aintitcool by ozmodier · · Score: 0, Troll

    All your dorks belong to us.

    Harry.

    1. Re:aintitcool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid troll, can't even get the saying right, it's:

      ALL YOUR DORK ARE BELONG TO US

      idiot

  48. did he see what he thought he saw? by Madman · · Score: 1

    Attack of the clones... he probably saw a training video for the Mormon church. It's an understandable mistake.

  49. Typical AICN complainer by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    You conveniently forget about the hundreds of reviews he's done of big studio movies where he complains about how awful they are.

    Oftentimes basing this solely on the script (Scooby Doo, anyone?).

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  50. Why do I not buy this? by Proteus+Child · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Something smells like a motherboard thrown in a campfire here.

    The language used in this review is reminiscent of the anarchy t-philes that kids used to write back in the heyday of the BBS scene. For me at least, that in itself is enough to cast doubt upon the review. It comes across as juvenile and written to whet the appetites of fans, and not much else. If it were written in a more erudite manner, I might give it a bit more creedence.

    I also wonder exactly how far along Lucarfilm is in the post-production process. Would it be in a sufficiently complete state to watch easily (like the Buckaroo Banzai workprint that's made its rounds for almost twenty years now)? I don't know for certain, it's complete enough to have a trailer. How much more I don't know.

    I don't know.. this seems a bit too pat. It's at the right time to cause a fervor, the timing's too neat.

    --

    Proteus' Child

    Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

  51. After Phantom, I'm willing to wait a bit to see it by xZAQx · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...Couldn't agree more.

    2 words:
    n* - sync


    Lucas is a whore, and he's not even sexy. What a waste of a perfectly good whore.

    --

    We dance to all the wrong songs.
    --Refused.
  52. Idiocy by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It never ceases to amaze me how quickly Slashdot visitors forget their animosity towards the MPAA.

    And it never ceases to amaze me how a reader of slashdot can assume there is no plurality here, amongst at least half a million others. We don't all harbor a blinding hate of the MPAA.

    I wish the MPAA would drop their stance on a lot of issues. They wish I would stop using DeCSS to view DVD's on alternate OS's. They wish I would stop using Morpheus to view certain things.

    But that doesn't mean I won't go and entertain myself for $8.

    I have not seen a movie (aside from free TV movies) in the past year and a half. And I won't. I have scruples.

    You are free to protest it, just don't expect EVERYONE on slashdot to do the same. And because one part of slashdot is like you and complains loudly, don't expect another part of slashdot not to like and discuss upcoming movies.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  53. Amen to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My brother works for Exxon, and is constantly being berated by hippies saying "Oil is polluting the environment", all the while driving their gas-guzzling SUVs. Or they import all-natural foods from India, with the airplane fuel being burned all the way. Or they ride their bikes, made of plastic and carbon fibers, both of which use petrolium by-products.

    Most people don't understand what it means to "cut yourself off" from Nasty Things (tm)

  54. Two great tastes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harry Knowled AND South by Southwest? Whoopee...Jesus Christ, why couldn't someone have blown up this secret episode ii venue? Harry Knowles is just trying to stay in the spotlight and is obviously lying.

  55. Guys, guys, guys... by aziraphale · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Listen to yourselves. You really think Lucasfilm aren't aware that the majority of the fan community has decided this film will suck? That Lucasfilm doesn't care what the mass of fans thinks about this upcoming film? That Lucasfilm isn't terrified that they won't break box office records opening weekend?

    The ONLY way they can make the impact they want is to do everything in their power to make people see that the film isn't going to be crap. To that end - the latest trailer is an action packed monster that gives away the entire plot; they dragged Harry Knowles into a room and showed him a copy of the rough cut; they are willing to leak the entire plot if it will persuade the average Star Wars punter that he will see Star Wars regain its status as quality entertainment.

    And you know what - I bet it'll have some effect. I'm more inclined to go see the film after the last trailer than I was after 'Forbidden Love'. I'm even more inclined to go see it after reading Harry's review. I'm probably not alone.

    Why assume that Harry hasn't seen the film when it makes perfect sense for Lucasfilm to want him to see it? They just upped their box office receipts...

  56. SW2: AotC _not_ at SXSW by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    I live in Austin and I know that the film was _not_ screened at South by Southwest. The world premiere of Blade 2, however did take place at the festival.

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:SW2: AotC _not_ at SXSW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did you even read the article?


      And is Blade 2 any good?

  57. *snort* by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After being flown to New York City to see a sneak extravaganza premiere of "Godzilla," Knowles ranted and raved about how it was the greatest thing he'd ever seen.

    A week later, he saw it again, on his own dime, and proceeded to trash the hell out of it.

    AICN has ZERO integrity. Always had, always will.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:*snort* by Latent+IT · · Score: 1

      Links please?

  58. Yeah right by CMiYC · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging by the quaility of the site, and what I know about SXSW, I'm not buying it. I'm not sure I understand how anyone at SXSW would have acquired a copy, and I'm further uncertain why this guy was so cool he got to see it. If you look at the comments after the review, I understand why he threw this together. The people who read his site often are all applauding him. So he's riding on a cloud right now because he is "so cool." Ain't that cool.

    And if by the 1,000,000th of a percent of a chance that I'm wrong, oh well. The guy still needs to learn to use a smaller font.

    1. Re:Yeah right by Mad+Browser · · Score: 2

      I don't know if he saw the movie or not but Harry Knowles is probably "cool enough" to have a source that would show him the film.

      Hollywood studios are actually scared of him, or at least of the power he seems to wield on his site... He has become something of a celebrity in the movie world... Hell, Michael DeLuca (head of production at Dreamworks - was at New Line during LOTR production) wrote the introduction to Harry's book...

      I think him seeing the movie is entirely possible, but if so a well placed publicity stunt by Lucasfilm...

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    2. Re:Yeah right by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      SXSW is a music and film festival, and a LOT of industry people are there. I have no idea whether this guy actually saw it or not, but it is not beyond the realm of possibility that it could happen at SXSW

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
  59. Of course Palpatine is evil! by reachinmark · · Score: 3, Funny
    What is Harry Knowles smoking?

    ... remember thinking that Lucas could be soft in the head for trying to fool the audience into thinking Palpatine isn't Sidious. I mean we can see that in the credits. What the hell? Right? See that is so like a self-centered audience. To sit there and think they are the center of the universe. The Palpatine-Sidious thing from the first film... The trade dispute...

    Of course Palpatine is evil, doesn't anyone remember Return of the Jedi anymore? (whas it *that* bad?) Who's that dude zapping Luke with the magic bolts of lightening at the end of the film? Could it be.. "Emperor Palpatine"!?

    1. Re:Of course Palpatine is evil! by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 1

      I believe he is referring to the rumors that Senator Palpatine is a clone. This would explain why the Jedi council couldn't sense the Nexus of evil standing next to them...

    2. Re:Of course Palpatine is evil! by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      Regardless of whether you knew his name or not, Lucas wasn't at all subtle in implying that Palpatine & Sidious/Emperor were one and the same person.

  60. Mod parent up, +5: Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it never ceases to amaze me how a reader of slashdot can assume there is no plurality here

    That was truly the funniest thing I read so far today.

  61. Re:I wonder by hrieke · · Score: 2

    Humph, I guess humor is a lost cause here on Slashdot, either that or Harry just doesn't like to be made fun of.
    Well, it's not like I don't have Karma to burn...

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  62. Attack of the Clones? Leaked?! by NowIveSeenItAllGuy · · Score: 0

    Now I've seen it all!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments I post? 120 chars?!
  63. Heres the review. by QualityWithAKei · · Score: 0, Redundant

    STAR WARS EPISODE TWO: ATTACK OF THE CLONES early cut review
    I saw Star Wars Episode Two: Attack of the Clones hours ago. The 'how' of that will be a thing of mystery buried in a passed piece of paper from my book signing with a hotel, a room number and a time listed upon it. You don't want to know about that room or the person(s) in that room, you want to know about Episode Two.
    Jar Jar Binks. Jar Jar has a 15 second StepInFetchIt shuffle speak routine he does as he goes to first let Obi Wan Kenobi and Anakin Skywalker into the Amidala's quarters that is so offensively awful, that it will not only make you recoil in horror, but it will remind you of all of the worst aspects of his character from THE PHANTOM MENACE. I wanted to burn the film, destroy, maim and murder it at this stage. I was steeling myself from the impending incompetence, the horror of my childhood being molested. I was prepared to have a very bad time.
    I found myself not liking Anakin Skywalker at all, he's a punk spoiled brat... A snotty nosed ego trip, that angry evil high school football quarterback that wants the head cheerleader. He whines like a Mark Hamill squealing about going to Toshi Station to get some power converters. There is much anger in him. He's impulsive, conflicted, out of control and a mass murderer. Everytime I saw him and Natalie Portman together, I wanted to tell her to run, fly you fool. But am I not supposed to feel that way?
    So did George Lucas drop the ball? Did he rape our childhood? Has he turned into nothing more than flannel wearing toy salesman without a soul or an eye for storytelling anymore? Was I disappointed to such a state that I wanted to yell and scream and break my original 12 inch Boba Fett and defecate upon it in a ritualistic purging of all that was once sacred to my childhood?
    To answer all of those questions.... THANK GOD NO!!! Lucas succeeds with the film beyond my wildest dreams.
    I was scared and thrilled to be watching Episode 2. The entire time I was in that hotel room, I was convinced that agents of Lucasfilm were going to knock down the doors and I knew I was being set up for a fall. I mean, it isn't possible to see STAR WARS early. I know that, but there I was watching it. Listening to the sounds of drunk SXSW revelers falling into the door outside.
    After about 20 minutes of that awareness everything but the film ceased to exist. The lights in the room dimmed in my mind. The person(s) in the room shrank like Scott Carey into the microverse. Everything about me was concentrating upon the film. The movie was not complete. There were moments where the effects were quite rough, but the work that was finished, was beyond reproach.
    How do I explain the success of ATTACK OF THE CLONES? First, I must say that this film makes THE PHANTOM MENACE a better film. In fact, I would have to say that not only does it do that, but suddenly you will realize with horror, exactly why Jar Jar Binks is in the series at all. Upon first viewing, in less than ideal circumstances, I must say that I feel that this is by far the most entertaining Star Wars film to date. It may not have that innocent sense of wonder for the first film. It doesn't have that sense of intimacy that EMPIRE STRIKES BACK had, or that film's desperation. However, it also doesn't have the trivial frivolity of JEDI or MENACE. ATTACK OF THE CLONES is a turning point in the saga. The point of no return.
    I love this film desperately. I want to continually watch it for about a week with my best friends. I want to see it digitally projected with sternum shaking sound. I want to watch as friends discover the twists that Palpatine/Sidious/Dooku have in store for us. I want to have the conversations about what this all means, the speculative conversations about how these elements will play out in the final chapter of the prequels.
    What is great about the film?
    Obi Wan Kenobi / Ewan McGregor. He just owns the role now. There is a moment in the Cantina/Sports Bar on the surface level of Coruscant, where he and Anakin have chased an assassin. As they enter this packed sci-yuppie-scum club, they realize they can't seem to be able to see 'the assassin' anymore. Anakin wants to rush in, tear the place apart looking for the suspect. Obi Wan tells him to slow down or something then turns to head in a different direction, Anakin asks him, "Where you going?" to which Kenobi dryly responds, "To get something to drink." Kenobi is just that calm about things. He is the king of cool. He'll get his suspect, but he's going to get a drink first. Priorities. I was reminded of him telling Luke to let go and to trust his feelings. He doesn't repeat that here, he simply lets go and trusts his feelings. We see it as an action, a path he chose. Then when he gets to that bar, leaning on it, sipping that odd drink, a drug dealer comes up to him and asks, "Wanna buy some deathsticks?" Obi Wan responds, "You don't want to sell me death sticks." Drug dealer says, "I don't want to sell you death sticks." "You want to go home and rethink your direction in life," Kenobi continues. "I want to go home and rethink my direction in life," the dealer says as he blankly turns and walks out of the club. Before he can get too smug about his little trick he senses the assassin behind him and he pulls the patented Obi Wan pivoting light saber at a bar strike that you've seen in the trailer. He gets his suspect and he's never broke a sweat. He is the master. Kenobi is just plainly cool in the film. Watch how he handles things on Camino or the way he doesn't betray a single thought in his conversation with Jango Fett there. He knows his game, his methods and his ways. He is confident and completely on the clock. Ewan is relaxed in the role, clearly having fun and is very very very good in the film. Contrary to Moriarty's assertion that he would be more 'Han Solo' he is in fact much more Master Li Mu Bai (Chow Yun Fat from CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON) but without the romance.
    Jango Fett - Boba Fett / Temuera Morrison - Daniel Logan -- I love this pair. I love them because they are the renegade Father and Son. They have their own set of rules, they are a self contained functioning unit. Jango wanted a son to raise his own way, that doesn't mean he beats him and does evil things. He loves his kid. He's training him to be a good Bounty Hunter like he is. There is very much a father/son - Master/Apprentice style thing going on here. And they have my favorite moment of the entire film, which is a tiny little moment between these two. Jango and Boba are headed to Genosia when they pick up that Kenobi is tailing them. They dive into the asteroid belt surrounding Genosia, Obi Wan trails behind them, not being lost. Jango tells Boba something like, "Prepare the sonic mines, we'll give him..." something, I couldn't make out... but Boba presses some buttons while doing what I can only describe as an evil giggle... a delighted giggle. Jango looks at him smiling, as if to say... "That's my boy!" The moment is so honest and real. I've never seen a father - son moment like this in science fiction. Completely classic.
    Anakin Skywalker - Padme Amidala / Hayden Christensen - Natalie Portman -- First Anakin is just an ass in this film. Like I said earlier, I can't stand him. He's like that boy in the TWILIGHT ZONE movie that has too much power and thinks about using it too much, but sometimes it goes terribly astray. Portman's Padme in this film has mostly dropped the 'high speak' that she had from the first film.... Injecting into her character far more vocal variety than the droll monotone of the first film that killed the performance. Here she infuses the character with more of herself, which is a very good thing. I like that she doesn't want to have anything to do with Anakin. That she constantly is aware of all the reasons they shouldn't be together. Of the scandal. Of their careers. Anakin hates being told no. She can see all the reasons, but when they go through what they go through... When the emotional binding takes place between these characters through a brief adventure, a loss of a loved one, a decent into hell... When faced with certain doom, they realize that life is too short to worry about the ifs and buts... And when it happens... John Williams' love theme kicks in. This really kicks in just as Anakin and Padme kiss before being taken out and strung up in the arena (you know the sequence when they are chained against the pillars.) It actually starts from the shot (which we see in the trailer - of the arena with all the Geonosis creatures seated and cheering - the long shot looking from high to low). It consists of maybe three instruments playing at first, classic violin, very sorrowful and warm. It almost sounds a little bit like the theme for the Incredible Hulk TV series with Lou Ferrigno. The intros are similar before other instruments join in. It also reminded me of Francis Lai's theme from Arthur Hiller's LOVE STORY. Although it is strikingly different from other parts in the film, IT FITS IN BEAUTIFULLY. Elegant but not soppy. Gentle but not melodramatic. Williams thinking differently (after all, a very different relationship from Han and Leia!) and succeeding. It starts to crescendo as the lovers are wheeled out into the arena (reminded me of the shot of Luke with the twin suns) - same type of crescendo. It continues through the cuts between Obi-Wan chained and them being taken over to the same place but changes into a military drum style (you know, the thumping dictatorship heavy beat - almost like the 'sacrifice has arrived'). This changes the whole tone as we realize their 'moment' has been intruded and they are in serious poodoo. The romance is handled in terms of familiarity and proximity. This is that sort of romance where one loves the other, but only at the point of an emotional precipice where the other could see that they shared that feeling and embrace it. I liked this.
    Palpatine-Sidious - Count Dooku-Darth Tyrannus / Ian McDiarmid - Christopher Lee -- Wow. Ok, read no spoilers about all of this. I remember thinking that Lucas could be soft in the head for trying to fool the audience into thinking Palpatine isn't Sidious. I mean we can see that in the credits. What the hell? Right? See that is so like a self-centered audience. To sit there and think they are the center of the universe. The Palpatine-Sidious thing from the first film... The trade dispute... All of it not only makes sense with this film, but the way it unfolds. As you see the point of the various guises and names... How Yoda and Windu sense no 'disturbance' around Palpatine... There are reasons for these things... Just because you don't know them yet, doesn't mean Lucas doesn't know what he's doing... Upon seeing this film, seeing how he handles these two characters being 4 characters... It is genius. Compelling Machiavellian positioning and deception. There are points in this film where I wanted to scream at the screen and say, "Palpatine is an evil Sith Lord! They're conspiring to destroy the Republic from within!" That's when Christopher Lee essentially tells Obi Wan the same thing... My god. The evil. The evil of using the truth, knowing it could only be interpreted as being a deception and a lie. The Devil uses truth to betray mankind, because he is expected to lie... and the truth sounds better, but will never be believed. Just wait till you see how the Death Star plays into this... You'll friggin die! FANTASTIC.
    Yoda-Dooku fight... HOLY GOD! Right now there is a lot of speculation about Yoda with lightning. It is on one of the soundtrack covers. When you look at that. When people described the ball of lightning in Yoda's hands from ShoWest, I thought they were insane. I thought only the bad guys did that. When I saw the film, well... I can tell you exactly how that moment plays out. So far as I have seen that hasn't leaked and it isn't a huge spoiler. When Yoda and Dooku first set up to go at it, Dooku hurls lightning at Yoda... Yes, Chris Lee's character is that strong. Perhaps the strongest character with the force I have ever seen in Star Wars history. He attacks Yoda with lightning, Yoda captures it, twirls it around, balls it up and redirects it back at Lee. When I saw this, I screamed like a little girl. I mean it was like Uncle Tony grabbed my pantied ass. I jumped about 12 feet up in the air and squealed. WHAT A THRILL! The Yoda - Dooku fight is astonishing. I can not emphasize that enough. I have been thinking for quite some time that there was no way on earth that Yoda with a light saber could look cool. Folks, not only does it look cool, but there will be a collective scream of HOLY SHIT when what happens happens. Yoda's fighting style is... well let's just say he could kick all your asses. Oh and by the way, Williams' DUEL OF THE FATES was nothing in comparison to this. Remember Vader vs Luke in EMPIRE... How overwhelmingly powerful Vader felt in comparison to Luke. Remember how weak Vader felt in comparison to the Emperor? Now imagine someone with The emperor's powers in a full on battle with a master. Here towers of metal are torn asunder with the power of the force. The ceiling ripped apart. Seemingly unlimited strength with the force. You will quiver, shake and scream. You are warned.
    You have to understand something in going into this film. What you have seen in Star Wars movies before were skirmishes... incidents... Remember, The Battle of Hoth was small, a minor hiccup. In ATTACK OF THE CLONES, you have the first REAL Star War. It isn't a space battle, but you understand the scale of things. The size and scope of a MAJOR OFFENSIVE. And unlike in PHANTOM MENACE, where Lucas decided to cut up the action by trying to intercut three consecutive arenas of battle, here he portrays the action linearly... basically following Obi Wan and Anakin and Padme... who all basically stick together, with Padme taking a roll in some sand to miss out on the Dooku battle.
    After the film was finished playing I was just beside myself with glee.
    Right now it is a very interesting time for Star Wars fandom. PHANTOM MENACE polarized the audience into the faithful and those that felt it had all gone wrong. That everything was doomed. With the introduction of MATRIX and LORD OF THE RINGS into fan circles, there began to be a real angry mix. Fights, screamings and hurling of 'love it or leave it' style rhetoric.
    Watching the trailers for STAR WARS: ATTACK OF THE CLONES in theaters, the audiences seemed muted in comparison to the delightful screams of approval from the SPIDER-MAN trailers.
    You know those guys that have been camping up in Portland? The experience they are going to have in the theater upon that first showing... They will be so completely happy.
    Now the cut I saw was still a bit rough around the edges, but folks... I can't wait to see this on the big screen complete. To see what gets cut, what gets changed, what I notice when watching this movie the way Lucas meant for people to see it.
    The source(s) that showed it to me were tired of all my LORD OF THE RINGS stuff. They were tired of all the rhetoric about Tolkien, all the focus I had on LORD OF THE RINGS. They wanted someone outside of the ranch, outside of the 'circle', someone that seemed to be straying from the fold to see what it was that Lucas had done. What Lucas has done, is to make a film that is so relentlessly entertaining and thrilling, that there will be no movie this summer that can stand against it. This is it.
    This movie is the real deal. It is smart, beautiful (god digital photography is the glory and the future of the world of film, the palette is strikingly dramatically colorful), thrilling and electrical. Essentially it is a pure action adventure science fiction fantasy with a touch of romance. Line up now. This Star Wars is for real.
    P.s. To the talkbacker concerned about Jimmy Smits... He doesn't really do anything major in this film. He is next to Palpatine though right before that amazing shot of all the Clone Troopers and those Star Destroyer things... So he's close to Palpatine, but I bet he betrays Palp in the next one (speculation) Oh, I'm off to Los Angeles, so I won't be doing talk back looking on this to answer questions, but if you come to the book signing at BOOK SOUP Tuesday at 7pm, I'll answer all NON-SPOILER QUESTIONS about Episode 2. In fact, I'll even do imitations of scenes and looks on faces. I'm so jazzed about this movie now! Can't wait to share, but not spoil!!! The gods of spies have looked out for me on this one.... That sacrificial Power Puff doll was worth it!

    --
    --------------------------------------------
    Customers are taking to many free napkins...
  64. Harry liked Episode I, too. by nobodyman · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Not to say that it's going to be bad, but let's put it all in perspective. True, Harry Knowles says that Episode II is great. But keep in mind that He said the same thing about Episode I.

    What's worse, he likes Jar-Jar too. In quoting from his review of Episode I, "Meesa luvs him!".

    So you can put me in the "I'll believe it when I see it" camp as well.

    1. Re:Harry liked Episode I, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Meesa like Jar-Jar Binks too. Meesa thinkin dat others be likin' Jar-Jar too, but theysa are afraid dat theysa be boombasted by theysa so-called friends.

      Yousa should be goin to da International Society for da Preservational of Jar-Jar Binks and yousa be seein why Jar-Jar not so bad, okeyday?

  65. that is not the point, my confused friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    he is not attacking MPAA, he is attacking hypocricy. Viewed as a whole, Slashdot is much more vocal in the arena of anti-MPAA, et al. than it is agnostic or pro-MPAA. However, when the community is seen as flaking on the issue, being so stern against MPAA and saying it is evil, but then cratering when their own personal desires claim the better part of them, then that is where the problem is.

    Basically he is saying, 'put your money where your mouth is'. Are you, my friend, saying that that is a BAD thing?

    1. Re:that is not the point, my confused friend by tswinzig · · Score: 1

      he is not attacking MPAA, he is attacking hypocricy.

      Actually he is attacking the MPAA, since he is protesting it, and he is TRYING to attack hypocracy, but not succeeding.

      Viewed as a whole, Slashdot is much more vocal in the arena of anti-MPAA, et al. than it is agnostic or pro-MPAA. However, when the community is seen as flaking on the issue, being so stern against MPAA and saying it is evil, but then cratering when their own personal desires claim the better part of them, then that is where the problem is.

      But you can't view slashdot 'as a whole,' because it's a community of people with differing views, not one huge borg of a thing with a single viewpoint. For example, I hate Linux and love BeOS. I realize many people, perhaps a majority of readers on here, love Linux. I recognize there are differing viewpoints.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  66. am I bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I zero'd in on the 'tit' in the middle of his subject, to the point that I didn't pay attention to anything else.... hmmmm

  67. Worse name? by Kris+Warkentin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh...a worse name than Death Sticks? How about ATTACK OF THE CLONES?

    --

    In Soviet Russia, hot grits put YOU down THEIR pants.
  68. fuel is not the only problems of India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Along side the health issues, you have the slavery, near slavery, any other human rights issues, horrible living conditions and payment of workers, and all other sorts of nastiness.

    But to look at that would require THOUGHT, when it is much easier to just REACT and prove that liberals are nothing but screeching monkeys that are just as happy hurling their feces as they are eating it, and just as happy killing another 'tribe' of monkeys to 'protect their children' (hehe, its ALWAYS about the children) as they are to protect said children by killing and eating the other tribes' children. Talking does not make you sentient. Charisma is a trait... it has only been regarded as a virtue by tyrants and the fools that support them. Awareness is not achieved simply because you use that word in a sentence for what your stated (but never actually followed) cause is. (nor does putting tremendous loads of bumper stickers on a car, house, etc make you 'aware')

    1. Re:fuel is not the only problems of India by The+Grey+Eminence · · Score: 1

      Enjoying beating that liberal strawman of yours?

  69. attention moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please read the moderator guidelines. Moderation is not for censoring. Moderation is not for ideas or (dis)agreements. If you wish to have your opinion manifested, then post a reply. You should have the maturity to say, "Damn, that guy is completely wrong and an idiot... but he brought up a good point and food for thought" Otherwise you are just beating someone for having the nerve to inform the Emperor of his nakedness.

  70. does that mean then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that this movie's 'EPIC' feel will encapsulate maybe 1 or two planets... with a visit to the third?

  71. confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A co-worker of mine who's seen the film twice at Skywalker Ranch said the reviewer must have seen the film because it's very accurate.

    1. Re:confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, well; if an anonymous, untraceable internet person says that he knows someone who says it's true, then it MUST be true!

    2. Re:confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's your proof?

  72. AICN did it before.... by Durandel1020 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who didnt notice before, AICN had a review of the most recently released trailer a good while before it was ever aired on TV. While then i was very skeptical, once the trailer finally aired and i saw it for myself. AICN was right on the money, and even included word for word quotations that appeared in the trailer.

    While that doesnt exactly confirm the SW2 review to be accurate, it surely shows that their news about SW2 has been accurate so far. And Im pretty confident that they wouldnt post made up stuff concerning star wars.

  73. Time to pop ROTJ in the VCR again by dswensen · · Score: 2

    Of course Palpatine is evil, doesn't anyone remember Return of the Jedi anymore? (whas it *that* bad?) Who's that dude zapping Luke with the magic bolts of lightening at the end of the film? Could it be.. "Emperor Palpatine"!?

    I'm afraid you're the one who doesn't remember Return of the Jedi anymore. The word "Palpatine" is never uttered in any of the classic trilogy movies. The Emperor is referred to only as "The Emperor."

    The novelizations, comics, and RPGs are a different story, however.

  74. What about N'Sync?! by gimlix2 · · Score: 1

    I know someone on the site asked this, but he never explains it.

    Did the death of N'Sync look neat or not?

    Maybe they go out doing that jumping Bye-Bye-Bye dance move they do. :)

  75. At South by Southwest?? by Self-Important · · Score: 1

    And to think that all I got to see at Austin's biggest music festival were live bands. Where was the "rogue movie screening" booth? I must have missed it.

  76. Harry also liked the idea of the Scooby Doo Movie by aztektum · · Score: 1

    And I'd link to the article but his page has been /.'ed

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  77. You don't get a screening this early unless... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2

    unless you are going to kiss the ass of the studio.

    Don't you wonder why all of these no-name critics that you see on TV trailers get to review movies before Roger Ebert?

    SW

    1. Re:You don't get a screening this early unless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. First, it's not the studio's ass that is getting kissed.
      Second, it is not a kiss that must violently, repeatedly happen to that ass
      to get a screening like this.

  78. You guys in Cali might have it better.... by Kibo · · Score: 2

    But the Cinerama is by far the best I've ever had the pleasure of visiting. It was Seattle's best older theater; bought, remodeled and brought into the THX age by Paul Allen. The screen is huge, the seats are comfy, the sound great, and inbetween what are usually the biggest, if not best, movies out at the time, you'll get the odd Kubrick film festival. In short, there is no better place to see a movie in Seattle. Hell between Vancouver BC and Portland. Seattle to Portland being the farthest I've ever driven to see a movie. In general, the vast majority of theaters in the seattle area are THX, DTS or SDDS certified. Most are relatively nice, but few have the nice nice stadium seating. Things have gone somewhat downhill after Regal and Lowes acquired Act III and Cineplexodeon (though the difference between them and Lowes isn't that great). At least they stopped forcing the poor Lowes empolyees to beg for money to help cure Terry Bradshaw's baldness or something.

    And in any case, I'm sure that Cinerama will add one of the digital projectors to their entertainment aresenal. But anything I'm desperately anticipating and expecting to be a sublime movie viewing experience I go through the extra hassel and expense to see it there, and insure it's as good as possible. As good as it could ever be.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:You guys in Cali might have it better.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Mind you, the Cinerama is almost a one-of-a-kind experience, to say the least. Having THX certification helps, especially now the music, sound effects and vocal tracks no longer sound muddy and unclear, which was a major bane of older theaters.

      Given Paul Allen's money he should install a digital projector at the first opportunity; after all, the US$150,000 cost is pocket change for this guy. :-)

  79. Knowles is Odd by KelsoLundeen · · Score: 2

    Is it just me or are Knowles' reviews truly bizarre?

    I know he's a real cheerleader for film, and that's great. But after reading his review of Blade 2, I'm sure not sure what to think of Knowles.

    I mean, I'm all for enthusiasm. That's fine. And I know he's somewhat of a celebrity -- he's got a new book out, appeared a couple times with Ebert on Ebert's show -- but his reviews are repulsive in a way that sorta defies any explanation.

    But not all his reviews of repulsive. Blade 2 maybe is the oddball. And I'm not sure even why the Blade 2 review bothers me so much. After all, it's sorta the power of the everyman-reviewer-on-the-internet encapsulated.

    But there's something sorta off-putting about Knowles. Like he's a bit *too* enthusiastic -- and oftentimes about the weirdest things.

    More power to him, I guess. No one is forcing me to read the reviews, right?

    I guess they're not really reviews. That's the part that gets me. Maybe I'm taking them too seriously. I just gotta chill, read it, and roll with it. But they sorta expose stuff that sorta makes you scratch your head (or, as Harry might say, your ass) and say, "Hmmmmmm...."

    *shrug*

  80. does this fool EVER say anything by abolith · · Score: 1

    bad About a movie? I have read a number of this guys reviews and they are always the same " OH MY GOD!! THAT MOVIE GAVE ME A STIFFY!!" or "HOLY SH!T THAT MOVIE MAD ME HAVE AN ORGASISM!"

    what ever dude. I have always found Movie reviews to be a waste of time. Choose any movie at any time, and look up some reviews for it. Oh my what a surprise you always find good ones (or at least you find a lack of bad ones). This guy is just another cog in the machine, there to churn out "wow this was a good movie" reviews for the RIAA and studios.
    I am beyond sick of the crap they try to spoon feed us. Movies should be more like "The brotherhood of the Wolf" at least was decent. To bad it was made in europe and we won't see many others come from over there. Hollywood has become nothing more than the great passifier for the public.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  81. That's a very small world you live in, there... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not so sure that it's a matter of people acting like fanboys of the movie, but most of us at Slashdot probably have something riding on Star Wars success. I'm willing to bet most of the people frequenting here have some interest in Sci-Fi. Star Wars has a way of expanding Sci-Fi to a greater audience, provided it doesn't suck. A greater appeal for sci-fi would certainly make a lot of our lives easier. If Star Wars ep 4 hadn't opened the doors to sci-fi, we'd all have to hide in shadows just to watch Doctor Who ;). If Episode II stinks, we won't be able to take our significant others to see the next one, or possibly any other sci-fi movie.

    As for the computer industry, Ep2 could give it a serious boost. Digital artists would be more in demand and we may start to see more movies done entirely digital. If this happens, we could see a serious upgrade to theaters aka digital projectors. My hope is that one day movie theaters upgrade to the new projectors, it might mean an increase of frame rate (smoother motion...) is possible, and for viewing on a big screen that'd really be nice. Ep2 could help usher that in, but not if it sucks.

    You don't have to be a Star Wars fan to feel the benefit of a good Star Wars movie. I have virtually no interest in seeing this movie, but I do hope for its succees anyway. It could mean a rather lucrative career for me.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:That's a very small world you live in, there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but most of us at Slashdot probably have something riding on Star Wars success."

      No, most of us do not.

      You think you *might* have something riding on it. You might get a job someday with Lucas.

      And I *might* someday be Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

      Okay okay. That's a flame. But seriously, the success or failure of Star Wars is no better or worse than the success or failure of "Pearl Harbor".

      What's worse, this isn't an article about the technology of the movie, or even how good it is, its a story about a rumor about the movie. And they ran essentially the same story last month when some douchebag claimed he had the script.

      Its just dumb, and it makes slashdot editors look lazy.

  82. David Brin's Theory by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This discussion reminds me of David Brin's theory that Anakin "bringing balance to the force" is a means of defeating the two great evils terrorizing the Galaxy: The Sith and The Jedi Order. Essentially, the Jedi are elitist fascists that disrespect the inferior populace as much as the Sith - it's just that they have an attitude of nobliese oblige rather and aspirations of exploitation.

    I hope this is developed, because in this context, Darth Vader is a hero - defeating both the Palpatine and Yoda and replacing the corrupt Jedi Order (I wonder if these celibates have as much problems as the Catholic Priesthood?) with something that's a bit more humanistic.

    Perhaps in this context the Jedi Science of mitocholorians (sp?) is just another example of their internal corruption - they should be training everyone in the use of the force who show potential, and not attempting to exclude people like young Anakin who was considered too old to begin training.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    1. Re:David Brin's Theory by Spencerian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You hit the nail right on the head.

      The elitist (yet still cool!) Jedi can't read into their own prophesies. Someone else (probably from Space.com's "Phantom Heresies" series got this idea published earlier, but I'll repeat here for fun.

      The Jedi prophesy that the Chosen One would "bring balance to the Force" works, but as the Jedi discover, not in their favor. The Force doesn't need the Jedi or Sith--they need it more. The Chosen One creates the balance by DESTROYING some 10,000 Jedi and apprentices, leaving only one master and one apprentice on each side (Emperor/Vader, and Yoda/Obi-Wan).

      The reason that these Force users are around also has something to do with their use of foretelling through the Force. Most Jedi, like Qui-Gon, probably do the "keep your mind on the here and now" thing. That philosophy ultimately gets them killed. Yoda and Obi-Wan can SEE the end coming--and take measures for another day. They can even see their demise, more or less, as Obi-Wan predicted to Luke before sacrificing himself to keep Vader from hindering Luke's first Death Star escape.

      The Emperor and Vader use the same talent, but it seems that mucking with the Dark Side doesn't give you the clarity that the Jedi had--otherwise, both Palpatine and Vader would have gotten a vague clue that they were about to part ways the Hard Way.

      The Jedi have survived as stoics (like the Vulcans of Star Trek fame). They know that emotion taints the use of the Force. That's why they really should have left Anakin alone, but their curiosity got them killed.

      Yep, ultimately, Anakin is a hero--he was the ONLY person capable of taking out the Emperor, who was more powerful than anyone except Vader. The Emperor knew this and subjugated Anakin to prevent what he ultimately did--kill the Emperor.

      Why must Anakin become a Sith? It was the only way to get close enough to the Emperor.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    2. Re:David Brin's Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      David Brin is an idiot. He sees a fascist under every bed and in every closet.

      Frankly, after reading Brin's oozings, I feel some sympathy for the genuine fascists. Another 50 years of colorless, personality-free "humanism" and democractic leveling, and even Mussolini will start to look good in retrospect; at least to anyone with any taste or asperation beyond the herd-mentality Brin lionizes.

    3. Re:David Brin's Theory by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Most Jedi, like Qui-Gon, probably do the "keep your mind on the here and now" thing. That philosophy ultimately gets them killed. Yoda and Obi-Wan can SEE the end coming--and take measures for another day. They can even see their demise, more or less, as Obi-Wan predicted to Luke before sacrificing himself to keep Vader from hindering Luke's first Death Star escape.

      Nice theory, but really Obi-Wan sacrificed himself to Vader because Sir Alec Guiness stoutly refused to appear in a sequel...

      I will stop punishing you now.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:David Brin's Theory by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
      Nice theory, but really Obi-Wan sacrificed himself to Vader because Sir Alec Guiness stoutly refused to appear in a sequel...

      OK, so who played the ghost of Obi-Wan Kenobi in ESB & ROTJ?

    5. Re:David Brin's Theory by LoFat+ByLine · · Score: 1


      Interesting theory, but in what way can the Jedi be termed "fascist"? According to commonly accepted definitions, fascism includes the characteristics of extreme nationalism, total subservience of the individual to the state, a rejection of all ethics and morality, and an exaltation of violence and ruthlessness. The Jedi exhibit few if any of these characteristics.


      The Jedi are elitist, yes, and somewhat authoritarian in their organization. But why would they be obliged to be democratic, since they aren't a government?

    6. Re:David Brin's Theory by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      The government of Star Wars seems to have masses being controlled by an elite, who are so heroic that they naturally lead. Maybe it's a democracy, but George Lucas doesn't seem to bring up the point that the leaders need to build a popular concensus. Instead, the government seems to exist purely as a tool to be manipulated by the charismatic. And the idea of a teenage girl being an elected official in power over a world, as was mentioned offhand in Phantom Menace, is obviously just paying lip service to democracy...what type of crazy world would do that?

      I don't think this will be brought up in the movies, just because it doesn't seem within the scope of George Lucas's ambitions. And I don't mean to come off like a crazy, saying "Lucas is a fascist swine." But it should be remembered that George Lucas consciously took many of his themes from Wagnerian opera, which is clearly fascist, and copped many of his images (for both the Rebels and the Empire) from the Nuremburg Nazi rally documentary, "Triumph of the Will." For instance the Emperor and Vader walking past their regimented troops, or the awards ceremony at the end of Star Wars...

      Not knowing Lucas, I can't say if he's fascist in politics or not. More likely, it's easier to tell the story of powerful men, than of electorates and polls and political tendencies.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  83. Don't get your hopes up yet... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    I can't read the review right now, I guess Slashdot killed the server heh. I just wanted to mention that the effects aren't done yet. If Ep1 was any indication, they'll be working on effects up until 3 weeks before the launch of the movie. If that's the case, then the reviewer likely saw an 'animatic version' of the movie, without everything in place. Normally this would be a good sign, except Lucas is the kind of guy to keep tweaking the movie in post production.

    I'll give you an example, long after the principal photography was done, Lucas decided to add a line for C3PO. They had an artist digitally recreate the left side of the picture so it could scroll over to the right, because 3PO wasn't originally in the shot. Then they had to composite C3PO in via bluescreen. All so he could say this very important, plot pivotal line "You'll never get me onto one of those starships."

    In other words, Lucas still has time to change it. A tweak here and a tweak there could potentially damage the movie. On the other hand, though, this technique could be used to improve the movie too. Who knows... In any case, as long as the movie has time to evolve, I wouldn't back any reviews of it right now.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  84. harry is hollywood's lapdog by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

    Harry is easily manipulated by the publicists. his ability to objectively review films equals his grasp of english grammar.

    anytime a movie needs good buzz or hype from a reviewer with 'street cred', the hollywood publicists will throw some bone to H. Knowles. they'll invite him to some party to hang out with the stars of the film. sometimes they'll fly him to the premiere (Godzilla 2k, that KISS movie a couple years ago) and lavish him with attention and compliments.

    who is Harry but a loser that lives with his dad and is so fat that he has to walk with a cane and SMELLS REALLY BAD? in the face of all this ego-massaging he gets, can you actually expect him to pan a film? do you think he'll say, "thank you for telling me i'm so cool ms. jolie. i'm afraid i'm giving tomb raider a thumbs-down"??
  85. starwars.com bio by srichman · · Score: 2
    What are you talking about? Even the slightest Star Wars fan knows that the Emperor's name was Palpatine. Are you saying that they are different people!?

    Check out the Palpatine bio on starwars.com. The relevant quote is: "In the Death Star, high above the Battle of Endor, Luke refused the Emperor's newfound dark side power, and so Palpatine used his deadly Force lightning to attack the young Jedi."

    Next are you going to suggest that the Anakin Skywalker from Phantom Menace isn't the same Anakin Skywalker who became Darth Vader?!

  86. advance tickets? by prizzznecious · · Score: 1

    I've looked around and so far I can't find anything about this (and I assume this means there's no information, but I thought someone here might have a clue), but does anybody know when advance tickets for episode II will go on sale? Or does it depend on the theater?

    --

    visit the hwky website for a lyrical genius infusion.
    1. Re:advance tickets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For TPM tickets went on sale exactly one week in advance. That means tickets will probably go on sale on Thursday May 9th.

      Last time each theatre had their own rules on when you could start lining up. The AMC I went to didn't let the lines start until 7:30 that morning(tickets went on sale at 2:30 or something).

  87. He saw it, and I think the studio orchestrated it by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I for one think he did see the flick. I don't know much about Harry, but he's developed quite a following by his fellow overly excited armchair movie buffs. Being the 'experts' that they are, I highly doubt any of them would let this kind of hoax by without leaving his site in droves.

    My guess is that this was orchestrated by the studios to get those 'opinion leaders' disappointed by Ep 1 excited about Ep 2. Most of the nutjobs that talk about movies all day long probably flock to his site and participate in the forums, so they figure a positive review by Harry is good enough to get the word of mouth hype machine moving. Any entry level PR class teaches this tactic to get people talking about a particular issue, starting with the opinion leaders.

    There is also a distinct possibility that Harry is in fact on the payroll of the movie makers. We've heard about the studios creating a number of 'fan sites' to build up momentum for various flicks, so we should at least entertain the idea that Harry is a more permanent shadow marketing tactic. In the end a bulk of the ads on his site are from the studios, so they are paying him one way or the other :).

    If there was a legititmate 'leaked' version of the film (i.e. not an orchestrated leak), there'd be a VCD traveling throughout the vast expanse of cyberspace this morning. This sort of stuff doesn't happen 'by accident.' George Lucas had to approve this or it wouldn't have happened.

  88. I intentionally DON'T go the first week by gosand · · Score: 2
    I make a concerted effort to not go to a movie the first week it is out, especially movies like LOTR and StarWars. That is when all the freaks are there. I don't what to be sitting next to some dufus who is in costume, or who cheers and claps during "good" parts. Not to mention the fact that popular movies are PACKED and sometimes sold out for the first week. Ewwww. I always get stuck with the idiots around me who have to have things explained to them, or they bring in a grocery bag full of food, and eat like livestock. I don't need the "community" atmosphere of a theatre. I am there to watch a movie, not share some kind of experience with other people.

    I waited almost a month to see Star Wars Episode I, and you know what? It still sucked. I'll go see the new one because I am a fan of the series, but I'll allow probably 2 weeks and go to a matinee.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  89. Godzilla 2000 crap? by fliptout · · Score: 1

    Dude, you just lost all credibility ;)

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:Godzilla 2000 crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit... he must of meant Godzilla with Matthew Broderik acting like a stone emotionless statute and a joke of a gigantic 'goowzerila' sprung from a geko... *yawn*

    2. Re:Godzilla 2000 crap? by EvilNight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that shitfest. I completely forgot they had a REAL 'zilla movie come out just afterwards. /chuckle

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
  90. That's only well-known among fanboys... by Thag · · Score: 2

    When I went to see Phantom Menace for the second time, my friends I saw the movie with didn't know Palpatine was the Emperor. They were surprised when I mentioned it in passing.

    I only knew because I had picked it up through fanboy channels around the time Jedi came out.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  91. NOOOOOOOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I was convinced that it would be Jar Jar Binks who died and brought Anakin and err Princess whadevver togethor.

    You're saying it was his mum? Awwww SHIT!

  92. Prrff! by MouseR · · Score: 5, Funny

    This guys says he's seen a rough cut of episode 2.

    Big deal.

    I've seen final cuts of episode 4, 5 and 6!

    And guess what? (SPOILER ALERT:) Vador is Luke's father!!

    1. Re:Prrff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you mean...

      "SPOILOR ALERT: Vador is Luke's fathor"

      fuckwit.

    2. Re:Prrff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you.. a retard?

      Get an education and learn how to spell.

  93. The real question is by xihr · · Score: 1

    The real quesion is whether or not he liked Episode One. If he thought Episode One was anything but the enormous piece of crap that it was, then his opinion is suspect.

  94. Try reading the post next time, son by dswensen · · Score: 2
    What are you talking about? Even the slightest Star Wars fan knows that the Emperor's name was Palpatine. Are you saying that they are different people!?

    No, not at all. What I'm saying is that it isn't mentioned in the movie, and thus the fact that Palpatine == Emperor would not be obvious to people who don't take their Star Wars experience beyond the movies (which, granted, doesn't include many /.ers, but is quite a few people nonetheless).

    The above poster was chastising people for not remembering Return of the Jedi well enough to remember that the Emperor's name was Palpatine, when in fact that's not mentioned in the trilogy.

    1. Re:Try reading the post next time, son by GeekTW · · Score: 1

      Umm, without watching the movie again, I'm pretty sure that the name Palpatine is mentioned when the emporor disbands the local governors in "A New Hope".

    2. Re:Try reading the post next time, son by klui · · Score: 1

      You should have rewatched A New Hope. The name "Palatine" was not uttered at all during that scene.

    3. Re:Try reading the post next time, son by dswensen · · Score: 2

      I'm afraid it isn't.

    4. Re:Try reading the post next time, son by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I saw Episode I, I actually "Ack!"ed out loud when I hear the line:

      "Hey, there's Senator Palpatine out there waiting for us."

      Everyone in the theater turned and looked at me, they had no idea.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  95. Re:He saw it, and I think the studio orchestrated by sammy.lost-angel.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Harry has seen A LOT of movies. He lives to watch movies. I think this makes him as much an expert on movies as any other film critic out there. His style of reviews is a bit unorthidox, but that does not mean he is a bad reviewer.

  96. HEY MODERATORS! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2
    This isn't flamebait. Flamebait seeks to start a flame war. This is not a flurry of insults designed to provoke attacks on the participants' mothers. This is what's known as SARCASM. Sarcasm is allowed in /. The point of this post was to show how factually baseless the entire story was. I wish /. had more sarcasm to tear down all the people who post as if they know what they're talking about, but don't really have a clue. They only spread misinformation and make work for those who have to correct them.

  97. Leaked...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, the initial preview copy for investors and market tests has been 'in the can' for over a month. It's not the final cut, but all the effects and scenes are completed, music and voice overs done, and final rough cut made.

    As to the review... well, who knows. I don't like the guy much, though he certainly has done me no wrong. I hate it when people bash someone they don't know personally, as alot of you have done today. His review is to kneejerk and possibly full of spoilers if to be believed.

    If he saw it, it was probably a cut out for the Lucas company(s) trying to build some hype, which they have done judging from the two or three other early leak reviews on the web today.

  98. Huh? by waldoj · · Score: 1

    After being flown to New York City to see a sneak extravaganza premiere of "Godzilla," Knowles ranted and raved about how it was the greatest thing he'd ever seen.

    A week later, he saw it again, on his own dime, and proceeded to trash the hell out of it.

    AICN has ZERO integrity. Always had, always will.


    By your own admission, he corrected himself. That sure sounds like integrity to me.

    -Waldo Jaquith

  99. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a VERY legitimate point. And more circumstantial evidence that the "leak" of aotc to Harry Knowles was a controlled leak set up by Lucasfilm itself. It's all about hype and PR. At t-minus 2 months and counting, I would expect no less, particularly considering what Lucasfilm has riding on this one.

  100. Can somebody put up a mirror? by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Harry's been slashdotted bad.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    1. Re:Can somebody put up a mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seeing as /. posted this story hours and hours ago and aintitcool remained up, i have a feeling something else happened. maybe lucasfilm's lawyers effect instead of the /.-effect

  101. Your prediction by IPFreely · · Score: 2
    I like what you noticed.

    My only problem is your inference that if Anakin had been left behind or not become involved in later events, that the whole of the univers would be different. Do you think that Sidious would just stop and fail without Vader? Wouldn't he find another apprentice and go on about his business of conquering the galaxy?

    Sure, it would be a major change for the particular people and events of this series of stories, but probably not a big shift in the overall history of the timeline.

    I think of Asimov / Harry Seldon and Psychohistory. Small groups of people may affect small events, but the greater line of history has at most a minor perterbation and most likely no real change at all.

    I always think of this when I here people talk about how one little thing would change the world. They usually think in terms of "all other things remaining the same, but this little change". It doesn't happen that way. If you change one thing, then everyone around it is also changed and adjusts to the new situation, and then persues it on new terms.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Your prediction by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "My only problem is your inference that if Anakin had been left behind or not become involved in later events, that the whole of the univers would be different. Do you think that Sidious would just stop and fail without Vader? Wouldn't he find another apprentice and go on about his business of conquering the galaxy? "

      Let's see ... Luke would not have been born. Anything that happenned between Anakin/Amidala would not have been born. (We will see in ep.2 I am sure.) Leia would not have been born to send the death star plans to the rebels.

      Yes, the universe would be different because the Dark Side would not have been reconqured.

    2. Re:Your prediction by IPFreely · · Score: 2
      ... And this is exactly the mistake that I just described in so many words...

      What makes you think that Luke/Leah are the only people capable of beating Sidious?

      Just like Sidious could find another apprentice besides Vader, the rebels could find another hero to defeat him. The details of how would be different when viewed closely, but the eventual outcome would be basicly the same:
      Greedy monster seeks power. Greedy mosnter userps power through various devious secret power plays. Greedy monster conquers known universe. Oppressed people dislike greedy monster. Opressed people form a rebelion. Rebelion eventually beats greedy monster.

      There's room for hundreds of variations, but the overall outcome (whether in a holywood movie or a corporate hostile raid or foreign government or even the US government) is likely to follow that type of pattern. Try reading some history.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    3. Re:Your prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've read the Foundation series, you'll realize the flaw in your argument. Basically, one person can change history...it just has to be a very important/powerful person. Read Second Foundation if you don't believe me... I think Anakin Skywalker counts as a important/powerful person...

    4. Re:Your prediction by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "What makes you think that Luke/Leah are the only people capable of beating Sidious? "

      Obi Wan: That boy is our last hope.

      Yoda: No, there is another.

    5. Re:Your prediction by phriedom · · Score: 1

      You are quoting one fiction to claim a flaw in a theme in another fiction. Thats kind of silly isn't it.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    6. Re:Your prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but there is another thing to consider. Going by the theory that everything takes its natural course is something nice to believe. But in reality, one person can indeed change the whole world.
      Do you seriously think that if the chance meeting of Hitler's parents wouldn't have happened that another baby Hitler would have grown up and attempted to commit mass genocide.
      Are you really saying that if someone could theoretically go back in time, that they couldn't greatly fuck shit up with just doing a few things.
      Everything is related to chance, and one small thing could indeed make a large impact to the world as a whole...
      I'll just use a small example... Jane Doe drops her whatever while driving, she jerks the wheel by accident while picking the whatever up. In doing so, Jane crashes into the car of Bob Smith. Bob Smith dies and his wife goes into depression. Unfortunately, if Jane hadn't killed Bob, Bob Jr would have found the cure for Deathalitus. Now, the cure for Deathalitus is found 5 years after Bob Jr would have found it, unfortunately... 2 Billion people died within that 5 year time frame. Oops. Now take this example, and think about the 2 Billion possibilities that were interrupted by Bob Smith dying. Now take the other few Billion ideas / people these people could have created had Bob Jr been born to stop Deathalitus 5 years earlier. Yeah, Deathalitus was cured, but the future as a whole is incredibily changed and nowhere like it would have been had those 2 billion lived.

    7. Re:Your prediction by IPFreely · · Score: 2
      I'll bite.

      The Mule did change the original pattern set in motion by Harry Seldon. But he was eventually found and removed by the second foundation, sort of the "Jedi" of their universe". The Foundation continued to grow. The occurance of the Mule was an event, but it did not ultimately prevent the growth of the Foundation.

      Asimov tied Psychohistory closer to detail than I would. I think more in terms of Chaos Theory. Chaotic fields may not be predictable in detail but can often be bounded and/or cyclic in long patterns. Weather is not predictable in detail beyond a few days, but it can be bounded (like tempertures are not likely to suddenly jump to 200 degrees, even if you can't predict exactly what it will be) and cyclic. History has cyclic patterns. Even if you can't predict exactly who or how or when it will happen, you see the pattern a lot. The growth of a powerful figure, the growth of empire, the corruption/weakening of that empire, eventually the fall (whether by revolution as in Russia, or by corruption like Rome, or defeat by opponents like Germany)

      The Mule was taken down by a force he was attempting to invade. The Republic was taken down by corruption. Sidious was taken down by rebelion.

      Sooooo, what will take the USA down? My bet, corruption.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    8. Re:Your prediction by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Yoda and Obi Wan certainly demonstraited their range ok knowledge by completely missing Sidious comming at them like a freight train. They didn't know the Sith were active, maybe they missed other people as well.

      How many times have you said "this is my only chance" when what you really mean is "The is the easiest/first solution I've found, and I haven't bothered to look for another"?

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    9. Re:Your prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Anakin had never left Tatooine, he would never have attracted the attention of Palpatine. Without Anakin as support, Palpatine would have failed in his efforts to eliminate the Jedi (remember it was Anakin's knowledge of the Jedi and his raw power that proved to be the factor in destroying the Jedi). With the Jedi intact, more or less, Palpatine would never have been able to gain the power to declare himself Emperor.

      Therefore, Anakin left behind = no Galactic Empire, no Death Star I or II, no blowed up Alderran, everythings hunky-dory, shiny-happy, etc., etc., ad nauseum.

      Kind of makes for a dull movie though.

  102. Jar Jar has a very limited role by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He makes an appearance (if you believe mainstream press), but only in a limited fashion.

  103. Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been to a dozen theaters in NJ and NY, and most of them in Central Illinois. To date I have only set foot in two that have digital projection and sound systems... most are film and analog sound... hell, most that show the THX or Dolby Digital opening film to ID their theater as being compliant are far from it, especially in NY.

    Try again bung hole.

  104. Kid? by TechnoLust · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Maybe you didn't see the news for NERDS... and besides, who are you calling kid? At least I'm MAN ENOUGH to post logged in and not AC...

    A general rule of thumb is, if you are too big af a baby to put you login by your comment, then you should stay out of the adult's conversations.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  105. Harry on CNN today... by niftyeric · · Score: 1

    According to this.

    Would he lie on TV? Would he tell this story on TV (in fear of Lucasfilm/Fox)? Hrm.

    --
    proton != antielectron
  106. Just on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was just on CNN Headline news (blurb). He is sticking it out there big time now, so I doubt he's lying.

  107. Reviews of AOTC from independant sources ... by SmokySalmonHead · · Score: 1

    Whats the source? I ask because it is unsigned and un-referenced and is compiled by some guy just "Lucky enough" to have a copy of the film slip into his lap? BULLSHIT! It sounds awfully like a bit of Internet PR leading up to the films release, right down to the very obvious give aways like "The film is a little rough right now..." or refering to Lucas as a "...flanel wearing toy salesman..." intended to make it sound lagitimate and making it appeal to the disgruntled fans which they need to turn up on day one to make up door sales. They even go to the point of analysing the fan base (comments about how the audience has polarised into the faithful and the betrayed). All of this seems so deliberately put together, like some marketing executive had surveyed a bunch of people, figured out how they felt about the first film, then put together this document, anonymously releasing it on the internet for us to pick up, interpret as some form of "underground release", and change our minds about attendance. I remember on "The Panel" (Great Australian talkback show) once when they were talking about those little film review snippets which come witht he advertising. Like for instance, Sony quoting reviewers which dont exist! This guy isnt an independant reviewer, he's a marketing executive stooge spreading pre-release propaganda. If you want a real review, wait for the sources you can trust, and ignore what was presented here.

  108. Smells like a PR stunt. by Dark250 · · Score: 1

    I mean it this guy sounds like Lucas Arts damage contol for Phantom Menice. Attavk of the Clones my rule but the fact of the matter is that this is a unconfirmed pre-review. They release a "leak" to hype up attack of the Clones so that the box office sales aren't hurting because of Phantom menice. This wouldn't be below lucas arts.

  109. great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I really want to know is where I can find the bootlegged copy of the screening, I know its out there somewhere...

  110. Boba vs Jar Jar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way Lucas could redeem the series at this point is if Boba Fett freezes then accidently drops and shatters Jar Jar into a million pieces.

  111. Uncle Tony by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

    When I read this review, I screamed like a little girl. I mean it was like Uncle Tony grabbed my pantied ass. I jumped about 12 feet up in the air and squealed.

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  112. Harry Knowles' review of BLADE 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For me to review BLADE 2, it is a major conflict of interest, because Guillermo Del Toro and I are brothers. His father says so. His wife believes this. Guillermo and I are just the best of friends, but when El Gordo calls my father Dad, and I call his Dad "Pops" and we delve into hours of passionate discussion about H.P. Lovecraft, Goya, Steve Ditko action, the movies and pussy... We can lose all track of time on planet Earth.
    But having attended the World Premiere of BLADE 2 last night, one inescapable thought crossed my mind during the movie. 10 to 1.... I believe Guillermo Del Toro eats pussy better than any man alive.
    Watch his 'HOUSE OF PAIN' sequence in BLADE 2. BLADE 2 is the tongue, mouth, fingers and lips of a lover. The Audience is the clit. Watch your audience. This is where Guillermo Del Toro goes down on the audience. It starts with long licks with a nose bump on the joy button slowly. He smiles as he does this... Watching the audience begin to squirm, then he takes the audiences' clit in his mouth and just licks it like crazy, the audience is ready, on that precipice, then calm. He backs off... long licks again, brings in a finger to massage a bit, licks from the bottom to the top... The audience is cooing... He has them, they want release. He acts like he's going to give it to you, takes you right to the edge, the audiences' backs arched, ready to cum.... Backs off pinching the nipples just so, his head bobbing up to say, "You like?" The audience shifts around needing release, he builds again... The pressure at a near boiling point... Each stroke and moment a hypersensitive place... Two fingers to the sweet spot, the audience is there... right there at that point... suddenly he's relentless taking the audience through a rampage of orgasms... trying to get away, trying to escape... back back back, but he has you, and he's never going to let you forget this moment, the audience was electric... Frenetically frothing... Guillermo hears them begging no more, when he decides to stop for a moment, there is that relaxed calm... The audience relaxes... labored breathing... a sated smile, WHEN SUDDENLY THE RELENTLESS BASTARD IS AT IT AGAIN!!!! You begin laughing, trying to push him away, but no... more pleasure, more joy, more fun... You can't handle it, you start giggling and screaming... And it goes like this for quite some time, till at the end... The credits roll, the theater lights come up... You look at the screen, you realize you want that tongue again... You want that feeling again, and you watch it again and again, because damn he respects the clit!
    Ok, maybe I take the metaphor too far... maybe... But I had two girls around me, Patch black and blued my right forearm with slaps and rabbit punches as though Guillermo was pounding the short hairs, and Saffron (not Vegas') gripping my shoulder from behind like frickin Spock, leaning up to my ear to say, "You didn't tell me this was pornography!!!!" To which I grab her hand, sniffed her fingers and said, "MMMm you're fingers are wet... enjoy!"
    Now you might feel all of this is inappropriate behavior on my part, but folks, at the Q&A afterwards, the second question came from a woman on the front row that asked Del Toro "Could you comment on the vaginal influence of the Reapers?"
    Guillermo looked like the wet chinned thigh splitter that he is and said, "You have to understand Make Up artists, they never get any pussy, so they are always creating it!"
    ZACTLY!
    Now lest you think this film is merely pornographic, and you seemingly are living in the delusion that that is a bad thing... It is not. Guillermo likes to pretend this movie is just there to make you go, "Whoa," but only a blind man can't see Guillermo at work here.
    BLADE 2 is from Goya's Black period. Look at the palette, the brutal primalness of the Reapers.. The sparing use of color... There is sadness amongst the orgasms in this film. There is a solemn pathetic nature to the emaciated monsters of the Reapers... A melancholy to the movie at its quiet moments. When you see the Reaper that Kris' WHISTLER catches... "Like a coyote he's been gnawing away at his arm to get away." There is just a captivating, can't look away, nature of the dead, the dying and the diseased, and Guillermo understands that morbidity. You can see it in his film here.
    His mounds of skulls in the sewers of Prague are not pure bones, there's rancid strings of something so icky and nasty that my eyes did not define it. The film revels in the Grand Guignol of it all, and does it all with a smile.
    A smile.
    That reminds me. Many people will wonder why Del Toro's BLADE is so much more appealing than the original, and the reason is Del Toro gets Wesley to smile... and for a bit, he takes off his glasses and we see his eyes... He strips away a bit of his cool stoic manliness and lets a bit of that kid in the cookie jar joy of naughtiness out. The result is absolutely captivating.
    Ron Perlman... When Ron and Guillermo get together, there is a magic to the scenes. Go check out CRONOS, watch Ron's vain nose obsessed bad guy. Watch how utterly delicious those scenes are with Ron. Absolutely magic. Here... Here Ron comes off looking, sounding and being just that badass you love. Reinhardt is a glorious bastard in this film. Just a fantastic ass of a man. After the film, Ron took the stage with Guillermo... He was dressed with a cool black leather jacket and a B.P.R.D. t-shirt... HELLBOY. My god folks... Having read Guillermo's HELLBOY script... It is 100% Guillermo Del Toro and folks as cool as BLADE 2 is... BLADE 2 was a teaser... It was just pussylicking.... HELLBOY is deep dicking!
    The difference between BLADE 2 and most sequels that you see is that Guillermo wasn't interested in making a sequel to BLADE. He wanted to make a vampire that you could be afraid of again. Not some guy with extended canines, but something you would run in mortal fear of. He wanted to create a swallower of souls... something from the inky black parts of your mind. Something new.
    BLADE has subtle romance... platonic bonds... machismo posturing... and just an insane amount of ass-kicking. I hope Sam Raimi can top this with SPIDER-MAN, but can Tobey Maguire be more cool than Wesley Snipes? Does that Green Goblin costume allow for the actor to perform and improv and connect with his audience the way that Perlman does here... Or the Reapers? Then there is the fact that this is 100% R-rated... unapologetically.
    Hope you enjoy Guillermo Del Toro's tongu... I mean BLADE 2, you'll be back for seconds."

  113. Book sales anyone? by NeilArrow · · Score: 1

    I'm a regular reader of AICN, and have a lot of respect for Harry.

    I also have no doubt that Harry has genuinely seen the film.

    What gets me is the timing of this. There's plenty of postings here about what Lucas gains out of this scoop, but what about Harry?

    Anyone noticed that he's just released his first book? And is right now travelling the world promoting it? He even mentions talking more about the film at one of his book signings in the PS of his review.

    The timing of this scoop seems very convenient for Harry.

  114. Harry Knowles on Jar-Jar Binks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (from his THE PHANTOM MENACE review):

    "Mesa Luved Him!"