Slashdot Mirror


Japan Builds World's Fastest Computer

claylikethemud writes "The New York Times reports that Japan has built the world's most powerful supercomputer from "640 specialized nodes that are in turn composed of 5,104" NEC processors. The machine boasts the computing power equivalent to the 20 fastest American supercomputers combined, and with a top speed of 35.6 teraflops, outpaces the next fastest machine, the ASCI White Pacific, by more than factor of five. Applications include climate modeling, global warming prediction, and other non-weapons research."

505 comments

  1. Obligatory 'Miniaturization' Comment by ringbarer · · Score: 0

    So how soon before they'll make them to fit in my pocket?

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    1. Re:Obligatory 'Miniaturization' Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never heard of the powerfull PocketPC OS?
      Have you been living under a rock?

    2. Re:Obligatory 'Miniaturization' Comment by Aus-Rust · · Score: 1

      like the old joke about the japanese electronics miniturising company that was so successful it moved to smaller premises

      --
      one day I'll have a .sig all of my own
  2. Take that ASCI White!! by blankmange · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's what you get for setting off that e-bomb last week.... oh, and don't forget the obligatory: imagine a Beowulf cluster of these posting....

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:Take that ASCI White!! by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2, Funny

      And on June 6th at 06:06 pm Pacific Standard Time it became self-aware.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  3. Did anyone see this coming? by saihung · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With all of the supercomputer posts on /. recently, I've seen a lot of talk about the various ASCI projects in the works by IBM and others. No one even mentioned this before. I'm glad to see that someone is building supercomputers for reasons other than nuclear weapons research though.

    1. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm glad to see that someone is building supercomputers for reasons other than nuclear weapons research though.

      For some reason Japan isn't all that keen on nuclear weapons.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by jjsjeff · · Score: 1

      What is wrong w/ nuclear weapons research on supercomputers?

      You should be happy they are doing it on computers instead of blowing up things in the desert.

    3. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how will they create a virtual Godzilla if they don't set off a virtual nuclear kaboom?

    4. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Quixote · · Score: 4, Informative
      For some reason Japan isn't all that keen on nuclear weapons.

      Or is it? A Japanese no longer unthinkable

    5. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Akito · · Score: 2, Funny

      For some reason Japan isn't all that keen on nuclear weapons.

      No, they arn't they seem to prefer the less traditional giant robot to the nuclear weapon standard.
      I wonder why...

    6. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Why? Remember that Godjira was woken up by nuclear bomb tests. I don't think they want to have to deal with MORE giant monsters, even if they eventually become defenders of Earth against Planet X.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    7. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by flufffy · · Score: 2

      focusing your national tech efforts on research other than military research also benefits the wider economy. spending increasingly large chunks of your gdp - as seems to be occuring in the us - on non-productive military projects removes resources - brains, research dollars - from the civilian economy. no coincidence i think that two of the emergent economic and technological powers afer world war 2 were germany and japan, countries pretty much forbidden to spend money on military r+d. and don't forget the destablising effect that the vietnam war had on the world economy in the 1970s ...

    8. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "two of the emergent economic and technological powers afer world war 2 were germany and japan"

      I think you forgot a third, how about the U.S.?

      Remember, we weren't a superpower at all before WWII. And you seem to be of the mindset that military spending != benefit to the public -- I don't even have time to go into a list of all the benifits that the world at large has gained due to Americas military spending (but I'll give you a hint .. you're using one right now).

      Maybe you've also forgotten that the U.S. rebuilt Germany and Japan after WWII...

    9. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the US didn't GROW into a superpower, it's just that the British Empire collapsed, Germany was crushed, France fell apart and Japan was bombed into the stone age. With all the competition gone (and many of their best minds harvested) the US won by default.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by dangermouse · · Score: 2
      Not true, the Earth Simulator has been mentioned a few times in Slashdot comments.

      I'm pretty sure this is where I heard about it months ago.

    11. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Yes - they don't like nuclear weapons at all.

      Ever watch godzilla? The idea is that nuclear waste [which is what a bomb is] will mutate and destroy everyone.

    12. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article took the Japanese politician's words out of context. From what I heard, it was more like "Making nuclear weapons is easy. Japan has the technology to make nuclear weapons if we wanted. China should not be proud of their military (nuclear) power."

    13. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Brendor · · Score: 1

      As I recall, due to post WWII treaties, Japan is forbidden from allocating more than a certain amount (2% +/-) of its national budget towards its Military. Which is probably why Tom Clancy chose an unnamed Japanese Coproration as the McGuffin for Executive Orders.

    14. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by flufffy · · Score: 2
      the situation, post depression but pre ww2, was that there were three economic powers - us, uk, germany. strategically it was thought that the easiest way for anyone to win was to form an alliacne with one other. the uk for instance was, using high level connections between british and german aristocracy, negotiating economically with germany right up until the outbreak of ww2. (the u.s. also had economic ties throughout ww2, e.g. ibm providing punch card readers to facilitate concentration camp administration.)

      what happened however is that the u.s., partly as a consequence of its geographical location, waited out the first part of ww2, and would probably have not entered it but for pearl harbour. after this, as mr. partridge points out it was then in a position to bring the best (nazi/concentration camp supported) scientific minds to the us, to work on the u.s. technology (think werner von braun and the apollo space programme).

      ok some military spending produces spin offs that are public benefit, but the vast majority of it is wasted, not least because the knowledge associated with it is siloed off into confidential realms and is not made public. military spending also has a wider impact, e.g. it was the u.s. govt.'s printing of money to pay for the vietnam war that (a) led to a good deal of the inflation ion the 70s and (b) also led nixon to take the u.s. off the gold standard (in 1971 i think), to abandon the direct link between gold and currency, and to floating exchange rates and currency speculation.

      the real question should be, what would have been the benefits if a portion of that r+d had been spent on civilian research instead.

    15. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
      • For some reason Japan isn't all that keen on nuclear weapons.

      "For some reason" there seems to be a severe back(s)lash against Japan, all because they quietly made something 5 times better, in a market presumably 0wned by the USA.

      I'm getting used to it personally, (Honda, Sony, Subaru etc) and if they are this good at it more power to them. Can't wait to see what's next.

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    16. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only think of you as a Chinese, or a China sympathiser. What is it that bothers you, if Japan builds up a nuclear power? There are plenty of Nuclear-powered nations. What on earth would make Japan more dangerous? If you get through the Chinese propaganda and look at the hard facts, Japan is a lot more peaceful than may Western nations. So, I don't understand your tone of alarm at the prospect of Japan building up.

    17. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in: the supercomputers will be used to simulate giant robots!!!

    18. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      "For some reason Japan isn't all that keen on nuclear weapons."

      It's all those Godzilla films - they think if they start testing nuclear weapons they'll have massive mosters trampling downtown Tokyo! ;o)

    19. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Nexx · · Score: 2, Informative

      What the heck are you talking about? Military spending creates new jobs, and the technologies created by military R&D eventually trickles down to the civilian sector. Look at high-impact plastics, computers, TCP/IP, etc.

      You also mention that Japan and Germany are large economic powers, but that has a fair bit to do with the fact that they were both important, strategically, to American interests. So much so that the United States bankrolled almost the entire economic recovery in many parts of Western Europe, Germany included, and Japan. Japanese economy didn't start to recover from postwar periods until the Korean War, when Japanese factories were used to repair damaged American fighters.

      Military spending becomes a liability when the flood of money stops. Eisenhower warned that *if* the United States creates an entire industry solely relegated to defense (as we did and still do), *when* the monetary flow slowed to that industry, *then* the economy will suffer. However, military R&D by itself will *not* be an economic liability, unless accompanied by shortsighted spending policies (as evidenced in the Reagan + Bush I years).

    20. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by btellier · · Score: 2

      >Did anyone see this coming?

      I did, since there was a story about it last September on slashdot

    21. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Which is probably why Tom Clancy chose an unnamed Japanese Coproration as the McGuffin [amazon.com] for Executive Orders. [amazon.com]

      I think you mean Debt of Honor. DoH was about the Japanese; EO was about.. um.. Iran becoming the "United Islamic Republic".

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    22. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      Japan's new prime minister is, in fact, interested in developing nukes. He could just be saying that to stir shit up (he's a confrontationalist), but basically it seems he's worried about China. Oh, yeah, they're not allowed to develop them coz of treaties. When did treaties ever get in the way of the military? Hmmm. lets see, they did wonders for the US national missile defense system.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    23. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might have something to do with the fact that Hiroshima and Nagasaki still have the highest cancer rates in the world...over 50 years after they got bombed.

      Kinda ridiculous though that they still have to abide by a 50 year old treaty regarding nuclear power/weapons research. Non-proliferation of nuclear weapons is a good thing, but the point has become moot now that so many countries have them.

    24. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by chand_subhash · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see that someone is building supercomputers for reasons other than nuclear weapons research though I guess no nation gives that reason even if its meant for that. Weather forecast has become the buzzword for such nations

    25. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by delta407 · · Score: 1

      And, you know, the whole industrial age thing... that was a fluke. All that land, hundreds of thousands of miles of railroads, abundant natural resources, a decent educational system, and lots of people... yeah, it must be that the US won by default.

      </sarcasm>

      The US was, indeed, a major world player, prior even to World War I.

    26. Re:Did anyone see this coming? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      I'm not taking anything away from the US, but it's really just that the US economy wasn't ruined by WWII that put it in the position it has today. Without WWII, who knows what the relative strength of the US, Britain, France, Germany and Japan would be today. I think we can be fairly sure that the US would be extremely strong, but would it be head and shoulders above the rest as it is now? I really don't think so.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  4. Non Weapon research?? by SirLestat · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah right !

    1. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be difficult to grasp for some US people, but there are actually countries in this world that dont want to bomb everything that they dont like for some stupid reason.

    2. Re:Non Weapon research?? by zapfie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Non Weapon research??

      Yeah right !


      Uh.. from Chapter II, Section 9 of the Japanese constitution:

      "Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. 2) In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."

      The Japanese are only able to maintain a defensive force, not an army, so even if it was weapons research, it would only be for use in self defense.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    3. Re:Non Weapon research?? by TeaDaemon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is, of course, one reason why the post-war Japanese economy was so successful for most of the second half of the 20th century. whilst we were pouring all available resources into 'defence' research, they were getting on with something a litle more useful and productive.

      It seems a largely successful strategy and it might be better if more countries were to consider it.

    4. Re:Non Weapon research?? by cuvavu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Japanese people are very anti-nuclear-wepons - which is not really a surprise due to the fact that they had two dropped on them. In fact they have sent letters of protest to the heads of every country that tests nuclear wepons since 1965 - hundreds of letters.

    5. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

      Yeah right !

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30869&cid=33 20 168

      --
      _________________
      EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
    6. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

      Yeah right !

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30984&cid=33 32 577

      --
      _________________
      EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
    7. Re:Non Weapon research?? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The Japanese are only able to maintain a defensive force, not an army, so even if it was weapons research, it would only be for use in self defense.
      Well, American policy has always been that it's nukes are purely defensive weapons (like the Peacekeepers) so the argument could be made..... Oh, I forgot. What's OK for America isn't OK for any other country.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Non Weapon research?? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      While knowing that if they were ever really attacked, the US would come to their aid and fight for them. What a deal! Also, I wouldn't say that the US has been putting all available resources into defense. The DOD budget far from being the biggest expense for the US Govt. The percent of GDP spent on defense is only in the single digits (3-5?), but is still twice that of what a country like Germany spends.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    9. Re:Non Weapon research?? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Oh, I forgot. What's OK for America isn't OK for any other country.

      Not since we have the big bombs.

    10. Re:Non Weapon research?? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      America to the world community is like Microsoft to the business world; "We're here, and we don't want anybody else to be here, so play by our rules, or we'll smack you down."

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    11. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you are euro trash or worse: a euro trash wannabe. My bet is on the latter. It is obvious by your lack of intelligence and education that you are a product of the American public school system.

      You see, back in 1941, the Japanese attacked the United States. Yes, I know it is hard to believe that a country other than the United States would attack another country, but it actually happened!

      As a result, Japan and the United States went to war. The United States won that war. I'll wait for you to stop crying. I know that being informed of this information for the first time has depressed you.

      As part of the peace treaty, Japan has been barred from maintaining a military force. They are only allowed to have a minimal defensive force. So, yes, it is OK for the United States to maintain a military, but not Japan.

      I must apologize for this post. I have used some words that have more than one syllable. I'm sure that has given you a severe headache.

    12. Re:Non Weapon research?? by stripes · · Score: 2
      It seems a largely successful strategy and it might be better if more countries were to consider it.

      So long as "more" is "all". If one country doesn't renounce violence it can just take whatever it wants from the other countries. If several don't they could just split up the world...

    13. Re:Non Weapon research?? by harks · · Score: 1

      The fact that they have to mention that the research is non weapons makes me skeptical to begin with..

    14. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Kenshiro · · Score: 1

      Isn't breaking encryption keys for diplomats of
      all other countries defensive?

    15. Re:Non Weapon research?? by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Sometimes I wish I spoke Japanese. They no longer want to take over the world, they don't like nuclear bombs, unlike the US, which decided to build a whole new generation of smaller and friendlier nukes, and they're making gigantic computers!

      If only people in the US would try making progress rather than devoting more resources to the "war on terror".

    16. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it's high time someone dropped a couple of nukes on the trigger happy yanks.

    17. Re:Non Weapon research?? by archen · · Score: 1

      Being an avid watcher of anime, I think we all know what Japan is REALLY going to do with this computer. They're going to build extremely large mecha robots which will (for some reason) be immune to conventional weaponry. Rest assured though, that the computer hasn't figured out a crazy enough storyline to justify cute girls in school uniforms piloting them...

    18. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah right, and the US's stockpile of nuclear arms was made simply to 'protect us' from the evil communists. we were planning for our 'defense' weren't we?

    19. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look dumbass! The whole point of building the fucking robots is the hotties in school uniforms. Jebus fucking christ! What the hell are you thinking?

    20. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sometimes I wish I spoke Japanese. They no longer want to take over the world, they don't like nuclear bombs, unlike the US, which decided to build a whole new generation of smaller and friendlier nukes, and they're making gigantic computers!

      If only people in the US would try making progress rather than devoting more resources to the "war on terror".

      oh come off it. if you hate the US's policies so much, just live in Japan. The nation of massive overcrowding, massive teenage suicide, goofy cartoons, goofy gameshows, massive family units per household, non-massive genetalia (oh, you americans have such big penis! gotta love southpark...). anyway, I love all the technology coming out of japan, but that's the last place I'd want to live. (well, not the last, but...it's a figure of speech). I wish we had better education here in the US, but not to the point of Japan. the kids are under such pressure from society/parents/etc that they have the highest teenage suicide rate in the world. it's always succeed succeed succeed work work work. and I could be getting my countries mixed up, but isn't it japan where you have a career chosen for you and that's the one thing you're stuck doing for the rest of your life?

    21. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Progoth · · Score: 1
      yeah right, and the US's stockpile of nuclear arms was made simply to 'protect us' from the evil communists. we were planning for our 'defense' weren't we?

      well, since we didn't use them (IE take the 'offensive'), that means that they were saved in case of attack (which is 'defense').

      retard

    22. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      *shrug*

      It's probably just a not particularly subtle jab at the US DOE nuclear weapon simulations research which gets done on the big American gov't supercomputers -- in other words, pointing out that they're using their CPU cycles for what theyc consider a better purpose. Japan isn't particularly fond of nuclear weapons at all.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    23. Re:Non Weapon research?? by archen · · Score: 1

      Well that's sort of my point... they can't take over the world with giant mecha until they figure that aspect out...

    24. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep OPEC fat and happy -- buy an SUV

      Not bad, how about:

      Buy an SUV: Support terrorism!

    25. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Keep OPEC fat and happy: Buy an SUV.

      Oh yeah?

      How about: "I am a research geologiest and have to drive for hundreds of miles in areas that don't exactly have maintained roads. If I don't have a pickup or SUV how the fsck am I supposed to get there?"

      Think not? My fiance is almost done with her degree in geology, and we DO have need to go to places like that.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    26. Re:Non Weapon research?? by supermoose · · Score: 1
      This puts you and I squarely in the minority, though. (Girlfriend is a geology student, unpaved roads are our friend).

      How many of the semi-alert doctors' wives careening around in a $60,000 SUV's, complete with 5 inches of clearance and flawless paint, do you figure actually go off-road? Maybe 5% at the most. The majority of them would be just as well-serviced by a station wagon, but hey, that's just not flashy enough.

    27. Re:Non Weapon research?? by stinkfoot · · Score: 1
      Uh.. from Chapter II, Section 9 of the Japanese constitution:

      i doubt a government would let some pesky little thing like a consitution get in the way. the american government doesn't seem to get too bothered about the US constitution, for example.

    28. Re:Non Weapon research?? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      Personally, I see a world of difference between using an SUV or a pickup for research, construction, or other legitimate work, on the one hand; and using it to drive around the Suburbs "because bigger is better" on the other.

    29. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

      You forget that alot of defense spending has a positive Keynesian influence on the economy. Technologies and methods developed at taxpayer expense are exploited by private industry thus expanding the American economy. Defense research spending provides R&D dollars without the risk to private industry.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    30. Re:Non Weapon research?? by zapfie · · Score: 2

      i doubt a government would let some pesky little thing like a consitution get in the way. the american government doesn't seem to get too bothered about the US constitution, for example.

      Maybe you should find some specific examples of the Japanese going against their constitution before you start making arguments like that. The Japanese government is not the American government, and vice versa. Unless you have some concrete evidence otherwise, you may not want to make broad generalizations about one government based on what you know about another.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    31. Re:Non Weapon research?? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      i know im going to get it for responding to a troll but here goes... you are so WRONG WRONG WRONG... first of all you are calling their cartoons 'goofy' in the wrong place... also of course they are overcrowded... welcome to earth but the differnce is that they have learned to manage their population issues in a very efficient way... also your genital comment was just completly dumb... im not going there... and as for saying japan chooses your career??? WTF r u tlaking about... japan has one of the most open career systems around as they look completly at merit of an individual... they may look differently than western culture does but they really do try do judge simply on your own possibility to succeed... and it is NOT all work work work in japan... face it... they have faced some really huge issues and solved them quite well... i think america has a lot to learn from them... just look at our telocom system... nuff said...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    32. Re:Non Weapon research?? by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2
      he Japanese are only able to maintain a defensive force, not an army, so even if it was weapons research, it would only be for use in self defense.

      I guess you're unaware of the recent push in the Diet to introduce legislation to change this law (partially, at least) so that Japanese are capable of joining wars in some cases.

      Link to story at Asahi.com

    33. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are an idiot. your rant is basically a list of overblown stereotypes. i doubt you have ever left your tiny town in the middle of whatever shithole you live in. you neglect to mention that teenage suicide is just a big a problem in the US, not to mention the crime rate is several hundred times higher. obviously population is a big problem in japan but only in the larger cities (like tokyo, osaka, etc.) goofy cartoons? goofy gameshows? obviously you have learned everything about japan from watching american tv. jesus, american tv can be just as stupid, as tv anywhere is. this is slashdot btw, where anime is revered. (i don't particularly like it but judging a country based on a its stupid tv and movies is about as dumb as you can get) kids under pressure? you have got to be kidding me. you obviously have no idea what kind of country japan is and probably can't tell the difference between japan and burma.

      "and I could be getting my countries mixed up"

      you probably are, you misinformed idiot

    34. Re:Non Weapon research?? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude. Unfortunately for you and anyone else that might actually need one, 85% of SUV owners never take them off pavement and own them as some sort of status symbol. Because the car companies know that the ave new SUV buyer has a household income of $120K or more, the markup is at least three times that of a normal car. It's about as pad with pickups. Most aren't sold to people who actually use them to get work done. The extra profits and classified so that they do not hurt CAFE standings, the auto makers love them along with everyone in the oil industry.

      I'm glad that you have a practical use for one. I just wish more people bought vehicles by how they will use them on a day to day basis instead of as something to impress their friends and neighbors.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    35. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Ok, before I open my mouth here, I work with Japan's technical advisor to Thailand. The major problem with Japan is that big business controls everything. More so, even, than in the US.

    36. Re:Non Weapon research?? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      That's why I call them "Sub-Urban Vehicles"

    37. Re:Non Weapon research?? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      No, America is more along the lines of GE:

      "We're here and we do a *ton* of good for the world. If you mess with us you will find out about our bad temper.

  5. US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interesting comment from the SJ Mercury

    The accomplishment is also a dramatic statement of contrasting scientific and technology priorities in the United States and Japan. The Japanese machine was built to analyze climate change, including global warming, as well as weather and earthquake patterns. The United States has predominantly focused its efforts on building powerful computers for simulating weapons.

    1. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Genady · · Score: 0

      Of course we wouldn't (the US that is) build a supercomputer to study global warming. We all know that global warning is caused by the AIDS quit.

      /sarcasam

      --


      What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    2. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Schwarzchild · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The accomplishment is also a dramatic statement of contrasting scientific and technology priorities in the United States and Japan. The Japanese machine was built to analyze climate change, including global warming, as well as weather and earthquake patterns. The United States has predominantly focused its efforts on building powerful computers for simulating weapons.

      Not surprising. Not in the least. Of course, the United States government is going to be spending its cash on simulating nuclear weapons. They have to. They have nuclear weapons. The Japanese, as far as I know, don't. Japan was stripped of a military after World War II probably because the U.S. feared that the same thing would happen to Japan that happened to Germany after WWI, that is, that Japan would get strong again and attack. That is probably why they don't have a military (I think they now have a token military but not a real one) and have no need to simulate nuclear weapons.

      As for being the fastest. IBM's Blue Gene will outstrip this Japanese model in two or three years. That's the downside. It will be two or three years from now. Oh well, it will run at One-Petaflop.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    3. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Oswald · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, it seems that both countries have aimed their programs squarely at 'solving' their fears. The U.S. has the paranoia that goes with being the biggest kid on the block, with every other asshole wanting a piece of you--so they (we--I'm American) concentrate on weapons. The Japanese seem to worry about bad weather--something about living on an archipelago in the middle of the Pacific Ocean--so they want to simulate it.

      The irony is that both could achieve perfect success with these computers and still be very far from fixing their problem. Perfect understanding of nuclear explosions is only a tiny, tiny piece of the national security equation, and perfect understanding of how typhoons are born, live and die still leaves you a very long way from knowing how to turn one off.

      BTW, my daytime job is in aviation. I wish the Japanese all the success in the world at improving weather forecasting--the current state of the art is a disgrace.

    4. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What surprises me is that this is the first we (Slashdot readers) have heard about it. There have been several headlines saying 'new supercomputer planned' with a story 'it will be quite fast, and finished in 2004'... but this new world's-fastest-computer just suddenly appeared without being preannounced.

      Are any of the supercomputer projects in the pipeline expected to be faster than this?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
      perfect understanding of how typhoons are born, live and die still leaves you a very long way from knowing how to turn one off.

      Yes but the U.S. Military is investigating on how to generate weather on demand. To own the sky as it were.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    6. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by macshit · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That is probably why they don't have a military (I think they now have a token military but not a real one)



      Actually, Japan has one of the largest military budgets in the world. They call their military the `Self Defense Forces', but it's the real thing, with big ships, tanks, fighter jets, and all that good stuff. No nukes though.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    7. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Japan has a military budget of 45 Billion. 7 Billion more than France, 3 Billion less than Russia.

      The US Budget is 265 Billion.

      My problem with what you said, is that you made it seem that Japans budget is close to the US's budget.

      All in all, it is a surprisingly large amount for a country that doesn't go into military actions. Who are they defending themselves from?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Oswald · · Score: 1

      I would call that shocking hubris, except I suspect the reality is the usual: blind ignorance. The people who started this probably had no idea how difficult it will be to control the weather--although you would think the Air Force would at least be familiar with how far we are from understanding how these things work when left alone. Every time a hurricane heads towards the coast of Florida they have to evacuate scores of airplanes from all over the area because they have no real idea which are in danger and which aren't.

    9. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by MrEd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the U.S. feared that the same thing would happen to Japan that happened to Germany after WWI, that is, that Japan would get strong again and attack.



      I'm more of a believer that the US foreign policy folks realized that making Japan artificially weak, in the manner that Germany was treated post WWI with their 'reparations' penalties, would be to repeat a horrible mistake. This would only generate resentment amongst the people, paving the way for 'dynamic leadership' i.e. another fascist/totalitarian government, this time in Japan.


      By re-making Japan in their own image, the Americans gained a strong ally instead of creating a bitter foe. Why attack the nation that put you back on your feet? There's a lesson to be learned there.

      --

      Wah!

    10. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Shillo · · Score: 1

      Angels.

      Gawd, been watching too much Anime again.

      --

      --
      I refuse to use .sig
    11. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, especially since the US has basically been the defense for Japan since the end of WWII. However, eventually, when the US moves out, they'll actually have to defend themselves...perhaps they need to be ready for that.

    12. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by smagoun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hell, with a budget of 265 Billion, who are WE defending ourselves from? Everyone else.....at once?

    13. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2

      200 teraflops != One PetaFlop
      1,000 Teraflops = One PeatFlop

      100 million dollars for another supercomputer just for bragging rights = One bellyflop

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    14. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by fr2asbury · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US military budget is SO high, because when we go to war, we want to destroy weapons and remove evil doers with surgical precision. All the while making the locals love the US.
      The US ideally would go to war where only weapons ould be destroyed and noone would get killed.
      To acieve this goal our weapons have to be extremely high tech.
      Oddly enough it's value of all human life, both ours and the people in the region we're fighting that makes our budget so huge.

      Cheers,

      Jonathan

    15. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Haven't you ever seen Ultra-man? The MONSTERS of course. Right after they stomp through the oil refinery.

      Cheers,

      Jonathan

    16. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, let's see ... In the last 6 months, I've been shot at by the Iraqi's. They don't seem to agree with out opinion that using chemical weapons on their people is a bad idea. Oh, and I've been shot at over Afghanistan. Not sure who shot at me, but it really doesn't matter. They had a bitterness problem.

      Yeah, so we're only fighting on 3 fronts right now. So much for that 2 front war concept.

    17. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Iraq and Afghanistan are hardly full scale campaigns at this time.

      AFAIK the policy of being able to fight a war on two fronts was designed with WWWIII in mind. For battles like countering the onslaught of Warsaw Pact tanks and troops in Europe.

    18. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by CokeBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Canadians of course!
      You never know when some pesky Canadians on a training exercise in Afganistan will suddenly turn their weapons on an American F16.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    19. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
      200 teraflops != One PetaFlop

      While that is true. It is also true that their intention was (is?) to create a petaflop computer ergo the title to the following link:

      http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/402/allen.h tml

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    20. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to free press! They look neutral, but actually they're very ideological, and will only tell you what fits in their agenda. There are several examples of what you say.

      For instance, free world press is eager to comment about leftwing dictatatorships, but not so with the rightwing ones. American thinker Chomsky comments that he could only hear about the invasion of East Timor 'cause he knew people from there. East Timor was invaded by rightwing Malaysian govt. We all knew about it only very late.

    21. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by zenyu · · Score: 2


      My problem with what you said, is that you made it seem that Japans budget is close to the US's budget.


      Japan's budget is big enough that the US wouldn't attack them. Israel spends much less on it's military than France, but they can fly twice as many sorties than the US in the middle east. If they didn't have that military we would probably have sent in UN troops a long time ago to make the palestinian concentration camps more livable. (I mean concentrarion camp in the traditional way, not as the WWII euphamism for the death camps.)

      I'm one for a stronger Japanese army, it's already strong in a conventional sense, but nuclear weapons would be a plus if only to keep an future war conventional. They have a vibrant democracy, and I don't see that changing even if they are experiencing their "great recession."

    22. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
      You never know when some pesky Canadians on a training exercise in Afganistan will suddenly turn their weapons on an American F16.

      I know this may sound like a joke but the military did turn around and perform a study of how to defend the U.S. against Canada right after WWII, I think, mostly because there was nothing to do (all the bad guys had been defeated).

      Really, I think, the exercise of how to defend against an attack by Canada was more for practice than for anything else.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    23. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Interesting comment ? More like RIDICULOUS!
      Everybody knows that there is no global warming. OK let me qualify that. ALL WHITE MEN know there is no global warming - just Milosovic cycles varying how far the Earth is from the Sun. He found that out after all the lieberals starting screaming about the sky is falling! back in the nineties.
      So naturally the UN and other one-world government types want him jailed for crimes against humanity. He knows too much.

      Like I've said before Asiatic types , like lieberals don't understand Western science. They play act like they do but they're just imitating Westerners by wearing white lab jackets and eye goggles etc. The truth of science eludes them because they're just trying to catch up to our culture, they can't understand how scientific knowledge advances independently of some Japan Inc. national socialist goal of achieving military parity with the people who kicked their ass. Just like liberals never quote anything scientific like you read in the Wall Street Journal but some madeup statistic that some socialist, burnt out hippy professor came up with using a federal research grant to advance his destroy capitalism agendas.

    24. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All in all, it is a surprisingly large amount for a country that doesn't go into military actions. Who are they defending themselves from?


      Uhh... CHINA!

    25. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

      Not only do they have ground troops, but we need to defend ourselves from their navy!

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
    26. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by snarkh · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oddly enough it's value of all human life, both ours and the people in the region we're fighting that makes our budget so huge.

      Yeah, sure. Keep thinking that.

    27. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting
      North Korea and China, mainly. Did you know that North Korea sends spy ships to the Japanese coast? They drop off commandos, who kidnap Japanese citizens, who are taken back to North Korea, where presumably they provide some kind of intelligence regarding current events in Japan. I'm not kidding, this really happens and is a sore spot between Japan and North Korea (Japan wants its citizens back). Japan's MSDF recently sunk a spy ship that opened fire when it was intercepted.

      Now admit you're ignorant of the security situation in East Asia and we'll go on. "Who are they defending themselves from". . . what a Chomskyite statement. Believe it or not, a military is in fact necessary even for pacifist regimes like Japan.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    28. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by meatburglar · · Score: 0, Troll

      tell that to Panama, Nicaragua, Cuba, Guatemala, Grenada, Columbia, East Timor, Palestine, Serbia, Afghanistan, Haiti, Somalia, Iraq, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and a few others that have slipped form my mind. I'm sure they will be very sympathetic and understanding to your "the U.S. only has the largest military budget on Earth, because it wants to *save* lives, not destroy them" argument. Read some history my friend. And I don't mean history written by the State Department either. Put in a few Freedom of Information Act requests for declassified NSA and CIA documents fromt he 60's. They'll help open your eyes a little.
      Cheers!

    29. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by El_Nofx · · Score: 1
      As for being the fastest. IBM's Blue Gene [ibm.com] will outstrip this Japanese model in two or three years. That's the downside. It will be two or three years from now. Oh well, it will run at One-Petaflop.


      This is what I like, competition. It's good the Japanese are trying to keep up. Competiton fosters innovation and inginuity.

      --
      It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
    30. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is probably the most stupid thing i have heard in my entire life . What is next ? " we napalmed Vietnamese vileges and children becouse we cared about them " or perhaps " The sanctions against Iraq who acording to the UN has cost 500000 children their lives is for their own good" . I hope this was a satirical coment .

      "remove evil doers whith surgical precision "...

      plese

      "Protecting oil interests and political controll att any expence off human life " could be the summary off the US military doctrin .

    31. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      yes, and all those actions would have been a lot less expensive if we had gone in with atomic weapons or carpet bombing. Instead, we used much more expensive precision weapons. That was the poster's point.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    32. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Yokaze · · Score: 2

      > That is probably why they don't have a military (I think they now have a token military but not a real one) and have no need to simulate nuclear weapons.

      Actually, it is/was not a dictated decision.
      Quite the contrary, the US was quite eager to arm (West-)Germany and Japan after WWII in order to have strong partners against the Warshaw Pact nations.
      Due to their historical background, both nations have a strong pacifistic movement (at last), which actually opposed against building up any armed forces. Probably to appease these movements (and their neighbours), both armies contain something like defense in their name (~jiei~ / -wehr) and in their respective foundations actually forbade military actions outside the nations boundaries.

      Both countries are capable to produce nuclear weapons, having nuclear plants and capable scientists, but strongly oppose to the idea of doing so.
      (Which might be easier, when you have a strong ally, who assures MAD, in case of an attack.)

      Japan has a spending limit of 1% of GNP
      (The US spends about 3%, Germany 1.5%)

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    33. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      Those would be the precision weapons that did this?

    34. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Um, why don't they just get a bunch of Japanese papers and read them?

      For Pete's sake, if you want to learn anything useful, asking a random member of the populace is the wrong way to do it.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    35. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Not only do we have a 265 Billion dollar budget, it's not enough. You may not have noticed, but the U.S. military is not hanging around like Japan's military.

      Seriously. With all the hot spots in the world the US is involved in, our military is streched to the limit.

      To pay 400,000 people an average $25,000 salary, is 10 billion dollars.

      The Navy was way understaffed the last time I checked. Their mission? Protecting sea trade routes. In this day and age, they're STILL protecting cargo vessles because people out there STILL are taking over ships.

      The bulk of the military consists of logistics.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    36. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      So, what, you're denying this kidnapping takes place? It does. Do a web search. There are relatives searching for their lost family members. Coastal defense in Japan is not a laughing matter, no matter how ridiculous it might seem to a jaded Western liberal.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    37. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Primarily the US has allowed Japan to build up their military because of proximity to Russian and China. For the past 30 or so years Japan/US relations have been very good and Japan is strategically located. Let the Japaneese people spend their own money to help us defend our bases in Okinawah(sp?).

    38. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by tetro · · Score: 1

      Global warming is a big problem, but what most people don't know is that only a fraction of it can be attributed to the industrial revolution. A good percentage can be caused by natural circumstances, such as volcanoes and cow farts. And Japan doesn't need to use their supercomputers for weapons simulation, they already have Godzilla, Robotech, and the Power Rangers.

      --
      .smell my feet.
    39. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Darby · · Score: 1

      Put in a few Freedom of Information Act requests for declassified NSA and CIA documents fromt he 60's. They'll help open your eyes a little.

      Well, they would if GWB hadn't gutted the FOIA. You do know that his stated policy is to fight *all* FOIA requests and he passed an executive order to make it easier don't you?

    40. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Darby · · Score: 1

      By re-making Japan in their own image, the Americans gained a strong ally instead of creating a bitter foe.

      No, we gained a bitter foe. Japan is still fighting WWII against us only they're doing it economically rather than militarily.

      Why attack the nation that put you back on your feet?

      Because the fact that they owe everything they have to us is (in their opinion) a grave insult to their culture. This is the downside to any sort of "humanitarian" aid. People end up resenting charity of any sort. I'm not saying that all humanitarian aid should be stopped, just that it has a downside that isn't often addressed.

    41. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by BaldGhoti · · Score: 1

      That's the sort of mindset that puts pictures of aborted fetuses on big signs, it is.

      Look, precision weapons don't always work, you know? The point is that the US military doesn't just indiscriminately lay waste to large areas--the goal is to take out the opposition's attack capabilities. The intent is not to produce the sorts of situations within your linked picture.

      --
      [insert witty sig here]
    42. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that the press outside Japan doesn't care
      much about this.

      I have heard about this supercomputer when
      talking to various japanese researchers at different
      CS conferences for at least 2 years...

    43. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by fferreres · · Score: 2

      40+ Billions to sink a boat once in a while? Oh that's really expensive.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    44. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patriotic Whitewash (+4, Patriotic)
      Opposing Realworld Opinion (0, Troll)

      Fucking Yanky Moderators.

    45. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      Um, no I'm not denying the kidnapping is taking place. I'm calling the kidnappers COMPLETE MORONS.

      Jaded western liberal my ass.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    46. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by nomadic · · Score: 2

      My problem with what you said, is that you made it seem that Japans budget is close to the US's budget.

      No he didn't. That wasn't implied at all.

      Japan has one of the largest military budgets in the world; nobody even SUGGESTED it was in the same league as the US's.

    47. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by nomadic · · Score: 2

      All in all, it is a surprisingly large amount for a country that doesn't go into military actions. Who are they defending themselves from?

      You've got to realize they in effect border both China and Russia. To rely purely on the US military defense would be insane.

    48. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by harakh · · Score: 1

      And how long do you think it takes for a country as advanced as Japan to make nukes if forced to? What makes you think there arent plans ready for it - just that they havent been done yet... hell countries like Pakistan can make nukes - its not all that high tech after all.

    49. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I buy a coke I will have to remember that the vending machine has declared war on me. Competition is not war and competition is good when it does not involve degrading your competitor.

      On another note the Japanses with a stock market in shambles for over 10 years is not quite the same thing we saw in the 80's anyway.

    50. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Flarelocke · · Score: 1

      >Who are they defending themselves from?

      Why, against Godzilla, Mothra, Mechagodzilla, Monster-zero, Angels, and superhumanly strong alien beings who, of course, can only be defeated by the hero, who is also a superhumanly strong alien being, but a nice one.

      (the last two were from Evangelion and Dragonball Z respectively, all others from Godzilla vs. movies.)

    51. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      scenes like that are a large part of the reason we use $100k missiles instead of $5000 bombs post-vietnam, yes.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    52. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by mgblst · · Score: 2

      This statement goes really well with this other comment just before it http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31397&cid=3379 065

    53. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      POE
      OPE
      EOP

      Purity O f Essence

      E mpire O f P etroleum


      Mandrake! in the name of her Majesty Queen Elizabeth and the Continental Congress I order you to fill 'er up!
      That's good shooting soldier - but two can play at that game.
      Semper Fi

    54. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are they defending themselves from?

      It was in the late 90's when North Korea, out of the blue, decided to launch an ICBM over Japan into the pacific. Out of the blue. There have been small conflicts, and the N. Korean government always makes no comments afterwards.

      Japan has land disputes at north of Hokkaido and also with an island betweeen S. Korea and Japan.

      China is a nuclear nation.

    55. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough it's value of all human life, both ours and the people in the region we're fighting that makes our budget so huge.

      Ah, now I understand why hydrogen bombs are so expensive! Because the American government cares about human life! God bless all Americans!

    56. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US has allowed Japan to build up their military

      You mean, just like the Russians allowed US to build up their nuclear weapons, out of respect of her sovereignty?

      Don't get me wrong. There's definately something wrong with a nation that spends umpteenth billion dollars in defense, and yet manages to demonize other nations on the sole grounds of "military build-up."

    57. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "The US military budget is SO high, because when we go to war, we want to destroy weapons and remove evil doers with surgical precision. All the while making the locals love the US."

      I disagree. The whole aim is simply to insure that the pictures on the evening news don't emulate those which occured (due to poor military public relations management) in Vietnam. What is now prefered is that deaths on the part of those being bombed occur later (due to a destroyed infrastructure, in cases like bombing of Yugoslavia, "economic leverage" or depleted radiation sources, in the case of Iraq), are attributable to U.S.A. client states wholly or mostly facilitated by the U.S. (as in Palestine, Columbia,..), or otherwise as a result of "indirect" or covert U.S. military intervention (whether by e.g. U.S. funded militias in Columbia and Central America, or *directly* forseeable killings as in Kosovo). This new U.S.A. military humanism is nothing more than a public relations ploy. The lesson is that with enough money, one can disguise even the most horrific massacres as humanitarian intervention.

      Those recently leaked pentagon documents which describe strategies for use of smaller scale nuclear weapons in a tightly (in a public relations sense) targeted context ("bunker busting" etc.) threaten an attempt to circumvent the general global condemnation of the use of such terrifying devices by exactly these means, and leave no question that they'll kill whomever opposes them if they can get away with it.

      If you work in the U.S., roughly half your taxes go to fund the military. Please think about it.

      -Yon
      yon@proptronix.com

    58. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think it's bad reading it?
      You should try living in the same country as these fucktard freaks.

    59. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      Heh, we evil-doer Middle-East types kidnap /. readers to learn about American defenses.

      We learn much! They have killer tyranosaur named "Carnivore" and have removed all rights from their citizens. Also we now have the secrets of how to make jpegs smaller!

      graspee

    60. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Darby · · Score: 1

      Competition is not war and competition is good when it does not involve degrading your competitor.

      Ahh, but when it involves illegal trade practices to stab a competitor in the bck it's not good for anyone. Note the US isn't innocent in this regard, but the Japanese have consistently been hands down the worst.

    61. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by mcjulio · · Score: 1

      Friendly fire happens. Get over it.

    62. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      Keep just enough cash to do the routine stuff military do? Oh, that's really ignorant.

      I mean, seriously, if the U.S. kept just enough budget for their military to do those " routine" operations like Bosnia, where would they be when a medium sized power attacked them? Suddenly build up like crazy?

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    63. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Wow you are SO SMART. You need a 250 billion budget "just incaze, so you don't have to hurry". GREAT. Beacause anthung might happen, and the US may have to nuke Japan again, or WHO KNOWS WHAT!!!!!

      Two words, and belive me, i only say these when forced to, as am very polite 99% of the time: FUCK YOU. Kill whoever you want, do what ever you want, but DON'T ever think you won't pay for what you do in the long run, because (believe me), YOU WILL.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    64. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Drizzten · · Score: 2

      After getting the DVD boxset, I'd have to agree. Sachiel is one tough mother. :)

      --

      "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
    65. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      Nice flame. Great spelling. But I won't go into that.

      I was just trying to tell you that military principles are based upon preparedeness. Remember Vietnam? (I don't, but that's besides the point) Johnson kept escalating, sending more and more slowly, instead of sending the forces en mass outright. This is what Bush tried to avoid in the Gulf War, so he send ethe whole shebang outright.

      And I have NO idea what you're talking about with this payback deal. When did a discussion of military politics get into an ethics debate?

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    66. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You blind patriotic idiot. US spends because US dominates. There isn't anything wrong or unnatural with that. Surgical precision is only meant to destroy better. Little nukes are currently being developed - tell me something about those, Mr. Surgeon.

    67. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by fferreres · · Score: 2

      I not pro anything in particular, i don't play a role. I'm just saying that while your argument is fine, you do pay a (HUGE) price when using violence. It always comes back to you in the long term. It's not revenge or payback (you = whoever).
      Regarding the military politics, i don't know, i don't work in that field.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    68. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by SectoidRandom · · Score: 1

      Thank god someone else out there has some idea! There is an almost scary number of potential hot-spots in Asia, for Japan, Nth Korea may be the closest, but China certainly isnt a "friendly neighbour"..

      Otherwise though, an interesting point you reminded me of, one of the requirements of a neutral country is a HUGE military! Obviously if you depend on someone else to defend you then you're far from neutral by any definition. This is the reason why Switzerland has one of the largest standing army's in the world, can't remember the exact figure but it's in the hundreds of thousands! (Compared to the US of about 400,000)

    69. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by johnsjs · · Score: 1

      The only way for the US to avoid killing anyone with their super dooper high tech weaponry would be if there were no friendly forces anywhere nearby. I always thought the weapons were expensive because they made such a big bang..

    70. Re:US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      I don't work in that field either. (in fact, I don't work; I'm just a high school student)

      Your post was just very.... emotional.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  6. More protectionism by saihung · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also worth noting is that the article mentions that the US gov't has blocked sales of these machines because they believe that NEC is "dumping" them on the US market - eg selling them below cost. Has there been any WTO action on these restrictions? Wouldn't this be a perfect test case for getting US trade restrictions struck down?

    1. Re:More protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Japanese vendors (e.g. Fujitsu, NEC) have historically tried to undercut the high performance computer (HPC) vendors. HPC is a difficult enough nmarket in the U.S. due to the small numbers of customers, strong competition and shifts in govt. direction (which is a big problem as Govt. both regulates and is the biggest customer). The Japanese govt. protects and subsidizes its supercomputing vendors. Although HPC is a small part of the computing market, HPC develops technology which becomes mainstream, such as Vector Processing (MMX instruction set in Pentiums), SuperScalar, Pipelining, Dynamic Scheduling of FPUS, as well as some ideas that may catch on soon, e.g. VLIW in Intel's IA-64, Simultaneous Multithreading and Multiple processors on a chip. With the current patenting climate, it may be that we will be paying license fees for patents generated by the HPC people. The U.S. should try to revitalize its HPC industry before processor design and production goes the way of Steel, Cars, and Motherboards (memory almost went that way, but Micron may stop it).

    2. Re:More protectionism by stripes · · Score: 2
      Wouldn't this be a perfect test case for getting US trade restrictions struck down?

      Not really since the dumping claim was dropped after they reached an agreement that made Cray the exclusive US distributer.

    3. Re:More protectionism by El+Cabri · · Score: 1
      You don't need this "test case". Use protectionnism has been declared illegal by WTO pannels several times already, on other cases, especially the subsidizing of big exporting corporations.

      But unlike Europe, coutries like Japan and the UK tend to act as the US's obedient poodles and usually they don't complain by themselves.

    4. Re:More protectionism by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      Yeah - let's hope the strategically important U.S. supercomputer industry gets run out of business by ruthless Japanese competition, and the U.S. no other options than to purchase whatever lowest-bidder technology the Japanese choose to offer.

      You might be intentionally burying your head in the sand, but it's a fact that Japanese companies will always choose to increase market share at the expense of profitability. Once they put their foreign competitors out of business and get the market share, they really don't know what to do with it (their 1980s economy burst over 10 years ago and they haven't fixed it yet).

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:More protectionism by smithmc · · Score: 1
      The U.S. should try to revitalize its HPC industry before processor design and production goes the way of Steel, Cars, and Motherboards (memory almost went that way, but Micron may stop it).

      Why? We'll just move on to the Next Big Thing, as we always do. The US didn't get where it is by doing what everyone else is already doing, but by doing new things, then being the best at them once everyone else catches on, then moving on to more new things.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  7. Why so few processors ? by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1

    They say "640 specialized nodes that are in turn composed of 5,104" but it cant be 5104 processors each. So each processor is doing 8000mega flops. Why not build a machine with 1 million Celeron processors for 100+ Million instead ?

    1. Re:Why so few processors ? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      First, let me disclaim that I have never worked with multiprocessor systems, but this is /., so that usually means I'm an expert in the field.

      I would imagine that the processors are specifically made for this application, and not some off-the-shelf processor. Also, It much easier to design/build a 5104 processor machine then a 1 million processor machine. Economy of scale doesn't apply here.

    2. Re:Why so few processors ? by jba · · Score: 1

      think about the overhead of syncronizing 1M processors....

    3. Re:Why so few processors ? by vanguard · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not a real expert but I have recently taken a high performance computing course from somebody who is an expert for my comp sci masters.

      The basic problem of adding more and more processors is keeping all the memory in sync. If you have a process that is running across 50 cpus the machine needs to ensure that if one of them updates a variable that all the others work with the current value. (Ok, it's more complicated than that but I'm not writing a book here)

      The solution is to write your system so that the calculations can run as independently as possible. However, at 100 million processors it probably just doesn't fit the problem space.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    4. Re:Why so few processors ? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Informative

      The basic problem of adding more and more processors is keeping all the memory in sync.

      That's why message passing is typically used instead of some sort of shared memory approach. You eliminate the synchronization problems as well as memory contention. After that, it's just a matter of keeping all the processors busy.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    5. Re:Why so few processors ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The basic problem of adding more and more processors is keeping all the memory in sync.
      That's why message passing is typically used instead of some sort of shared memory approach. You eliminate the synchronization problems as well as memory contention. After that, it's just a matter of keeping all the processors busy.

      In large systems, fan-in and fan-out of wired connections are limited. This means that contention occurs in the switches and possibly along the wires (if they are multiplexed) so that communication patterns must be carefully analyzed.
      Also, some systems allow for speculative execution which does keep the processors busy (VERY BUSY) but then you need to manage the checkpointing and state very carefully (or handle reverse computation).
    6. Re:Why so few processors ? by Salamander · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's why message passing is typically used...You eliminate the synchronization problems

      Wrong. Just plain wrong. Explicit message passing can often reduce communication overhead compared to coherent shared memory, but the synchronization problems are still very much present. You still can't operate on data before it becomes available, regardless of the programming model. Explicit message-passing systems handle synchronization very differently than shared-memory systems, but those problems don't just go away.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    7. Re:Why so few processors ? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I was being imprecise - I was referring to the synchronization of shared memory. My point was that you eliminate a great deal of unnecessary sunchronization by making this explicit - instead of locking a region of memory and playing with it, you compute something and send it to whoever needs it.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:Why so few processors ? by nadaou · · Score: 0

      I'm not a real expert

      me neither, so don't burn me too much..

      The basic problem of adding more and more processors is keeping all the memory in sync. If you have a process that is running across 50 cpus the machine needs to ensure that if one of them updates a variable that all the others work with the current value.

      just to throw out an idea .. (which is probably already used, but once again see above) Why not use a 'supernode' system to scale it, ala the FastTrack P2P system... one out of every 16 processors or so is a platoon leader & saves a bit of space to do admin, dishes out checksums to make sure everyone is still on the same page (sorry bout the pun), and reports back to a lieutenant, which reports back to another higher up and so on..

      Interesting at least to see where the new P2P scaling work goes anyhow. The laws of nodes that have to talk to each other are fundamentally the same.. it's just the platform based optimizations that differ.. or put another way, the trunk should end up being somewhat simular, even if you're looking at the stalk of a flower or a banyan tree.. actually come to think of it, looking at how various large trees scale could be very interesting.. 1st get tall, next branch out, next fatten the pipe/trunk.. evolution has already figured out the most efficent answers for many things.. can't beat 4 billion years of brute force replication! hrmmmm...

      shrug. need sleep.

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    9. Re:Why so few processors ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never hear of "lock-step", bitch? Imagine it... we could get, like, 700 Mhz out of that bad mother fucker.

    10. Re:Why so few processors ? by vanguard · · Score: 2

      Actually, the "super-node" idea was how they originally did SMP systems.

      So each processor is connected by the front side bus. When you need a value you check each processor to see if it has it before you get it from main memory. Your alternative is to check with the controlling processor instead of each individual processor. Through the years they found that the loss of a processor just for admin tasks wasn't worth it. Now everybody shares admin load and everybody does work.

      Because this admin load get's to be too much, they normally divide the machine into subsections. For example, the 64 CPU sun box I use at work is divided into 8 smaller sections. Each of the 8 CPUs are equally close to memory but they are far from the other "sub machine's" memory.

      Anyway, I'm kind of rambling here but the general idea is that super computer builders have moved away from that idea in most of the models I've seen. Instead they try to keep the communication requirements low. (AKA, maximizing locality of reference)

      If a "real" expert is around who knows of something different I'm all ears.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    11. Re:Why so few processors ? by Zorquan · · Score: 1
      I took a compiler class from a developer at Cray and anytime I mentioned "cache" he cringed and said it was bad. He also gave us an overview of the supercomputer they were developing. There were no caches - the latency was very low and the memory had some extra bits to indicate whether it was locked (among other things) in order to allow it to be used for synchronization. Very cool stuff. And the MTA processors were pretty cool too :)

      http://www.cray.com/products/systems/mta/

    12. Re:Why so few processors ? by vanguard · · Score: 1

      Cool, my professor also worked at Cray but he is currently in IBM's Netfinity performace lab.

      Anyway, no cache? I guess they must have some very fast ram if they don't need a local cache anymore. I'll check out the link.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    13. Re:Why so few processors ? by NinjaGaidenIIIcuts · · Score: 1

      For things that operate like bots no cache is really preferrable. Cache means a type of work that:

      1 - Raises latency, this point was already stated here.

      2 - Deals with prediction mechanics, which lowers behavior reliability.

      Other thing, that supercomputer has "only" 5104 NEC processors, but there in /. haven't people asked how many simultaneous threads *each* cpu is capable of? That NEC cpus contain support for a vector-processing instruction set and were *much* more optimized for their work than POWER3's inside ASCI White.

    14. Re:Why so few processors ? by dsoltesz · · Score: 1
      1. Scientists are annoyingly fussy about floating point precision
      2. Celerons aren't made in Japan
      3. Celerons are almost devoid of cache
      4. Celerons suck
  8. Non-weapon? by u01000101 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Applications include climate modeling, global warming prediction, and other non-weapons research.

    Ok, it's non-weapon if you think "weather-man". But virtually anything, and any knowledge, can be used to "weapons" end. Why should this be different?

    --
    if you use a good enough junk-filter, slashdot.org will display a single, *blank*, page
    1. Re:Non-weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Applications include climate modeling [...] But virtually anything, and any knowledge, can be used to "weapons"

      You know you're right!
      - scientist: our climate modeling indicates that if we start our weekly barbeque at exactly 6:17pm, a US weapons lab will be destroyed by a powerful tornado in 41 days.
      - director: well let's start our barbeque at 6:17pm to see if you're right. Welcome to the 21st century, America! (insert maniacal laughter).

    2. Re:Non-weapon? by awol · · Score: 1

      Probably due to the "policy" constraints of the owners. Not all limitations have to be technical. The Japanese have a _very_ strict attitude towrads military issues.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    3. Re:Non-weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chaos theory. One-way functions.

      But still, HEE-HEE-HEE-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

      Of course, since the best meteorologists have and always will lead to the best military forces, there is more than a grain of truth behind the joke.

      BRAVO!

    4. Re:Non-weapon? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      That's a rather outdated and simplistic attitude. There is a very sizable faction of Japanese who would like nothing better than to declare Japan a nuclear power and begin dominating the Pacific again. These aren't wierdo radicals, either, big-time politicians think this way, among them the Governor of Tokyo. Didn't the Prime Minister of Japan make a big stink a few years back , by visiting a military cemetery to pay respect to men who were undisputedly war criminals far worse than any Serbian. Now what was that about strict attitudes again?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Non-weapon? by u01000101 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      very sizable faction of Japanese who would like nothing better than to declare Japan a nuclear power and begin dominating the Pacific again

      [off topic]
      And if they decide to do this, is it good or bad? Who's gonna challenge them?
      Is the US (or EU, or China) better at dominating the Pacific? At least the chinese and the japanese understand the local culture, understanding which has eluded the West for 500 years.
      The US is not in the position to freeze japanese assets, as in 1941. Maybe Japan is the natural Israel of the Pacific, after all.

      --
      if you use a good enough junk-filter, slashdot.org will display a single, *blank*, page
    6. Re:Non-weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Note, to the parent's moderators]
      Hope you die soon and join your nazi friends in hell.

      Get a clue, people.
      On second thought, this *is* slashdot. oh well

  9. IBM & POWER4 by jrsgoku · · Score: 1

    I wonder who long till IBM comes out with another super computer base on the Power4 processor. It should make the game more interesting since Power4 destroys Power3 in terms of performance and memory bandwith.

    1. Re:IBM & POWER4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Each IBM Power4 could smash the equivalent processor from NEC.

  10. How long will it take by Krapangor · · Score: 0

    until we have computer the this compational power sitting on our desktops ?
    Would the Japs wait 10 years or so, they could order one at dell for just 999$.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  11. *sighs* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you wonder why they bother? They're only going to have to destroy the thing when it sprouts purple tentacles and destroys Tokyo.

    1. Re:*sighs* by JanusFury · · Score: 1

      Nah, we'll be fine, don't you remember? What's-his-name from /. created that 1-byte turing machine... well, all we have to do is change the '1' to a '0' and we get a rabid flying monkey. Tokyo's saved, though I'm not sure what we'd do about the monkey...

      --
      using namespace slashdot;
      troll::post();
    2. Re:*sighs* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dial "M" for Monkey

  12. Global Warming Predictions?...or... by subhuman666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We all know that it's really used for Japan's top secret Super Ultra Omega Gundam Robot Mobile Suit 95006^10.

    1. Re:Global Warming Predictions?...or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Level 360, 14 years.

    2. Re:Global Warming Predictions?...or... by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

      Once they fire this baby up it will CREATE global warming .

  13. The Model is to follow ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The supercomputer was built with 'the earth systems model' in mind. This will be the most ambitious computer model ever concieved. It aims to simulate every aspect of the earth system climate - including more processes than ever before: atmospheric processes, ocean processes,land surface feedbacks and land use models, economic models, ice sheet models, at a higher resolution than ever before.

    Predictably the model is rumoured to be still 2 years off target yet - so there is the worlds fastest computer sitting idle for the mean time.

    Perhaps I could buy some space to run my webpage off it in the mean time ... ;-)

  14. CS Server? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

    "It's potentially quite significant," said Dr. Tim Kalleen, a space scientist who is director of the American climate research center. He said his researchers were discussing with their Japanese counterparts the technical details needed to make sure CounterStrike server will run on the Japanese machine.

    I had no idea CS was still so popular.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    1. Re:CS Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Begger than ever and will continue to grow...

  15. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AGREE!

    Even their Linux distro is better...and thats European so..guess they beat them too. Oh wait aren't the Americans better in making war, bombing country's and
    making money?

  16. Hmmm.. by Noobie · · Score: 0

    Didn't Japan brag (to China) how they could build lots of nuclear weapons in very short time.. Wonder how they are going to accomplish that?

  17. Weather Man, tell me when to launch ICBM by KeatonMill · · Score: 1

    Non-weapons research my foot. While I know that other countries actually do have other things on their mind than defense against people they've pissed off, that doesn't mean that they're still going to reasearch weapons.
    On a side note, how much of that computing power is used to administer tasks to all the processors? It seems to me that the more processors you have, the less power each adds on, because some power has to be saved for administrative tasks.
    I wonder what kind of FPS someone could get on that thing... ;-)

    1. Re:Weather Man, tell me when to launch ICBM by Hal_9000@!!!@ · · Score: 1
      Non-weapons research my foot. While I know that other countries actually do have other things on their mind than defense against people they've pissed off, that doesn't mean that they're still going to reasearch weapons.

      While it's quite obvious to me that you're not trying to start a legitamate discussion about this, it is worth noting that Japan's constitution prohibits it from having a standing army (they do have a "Defense Force", kind of like the National Guard) and from sending any kind of force into any other nation.

      Their constitution also says "...the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes."

      So basically the Japenese are not really interested in weapons.

      --
      My email is real.
    2. Re:Weather Man, tell me when to launch ICBM by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      Boy, you're ignorant. Japan has the highest-quality military in Asia. And it's not tiny, either, despite the "SDF" label.

      I'm not going to even get into it, but the Constitution you refer to was written by Americans, not the Japanese themselves. The repeal of Article 9 has been debated for many years, and Japan may well repudiate it in the next few years, and become a "normal" nation with seagoing navy and overseas bases.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Weather Man, tell me when to launch ICBM by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble...and no, i don't think this computer is neccessarily about weapons...but do you really think that Japan doesn't ever plan to fight a war ever again? especially considering that they have a "defense force" that isn't too small? Read several posts higher in the thread for more info, but right _now_ they have an army. Just because it's in our constitution, do you think that our government at one time or another hasn't ignored that particular rule when they deemed it neccessary? Japan won't always be an Aldaraan (sp? sorry S.W. fans), they aren't now - but whether they will fight again is a more interesting question...mmmm...world war 3...

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
  18. Re:Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was 60 years ago? do you still refer to japanese as 'japs?' you're an asshole.

  19. NY times login generator by haedesch · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:NY times login generator by haedesch · · Score: 1

      I didnt make it, all credit goes to the creator of the generator, majcher

    2. Re:NY times login generator by namtog · · Score: 1

      I also think it is way cool. Thought I would mention what all /.'s know anyway. This LG is javascript which the author invites you to "steal" and do what you want with. I have a copy on my desk top, saves majcher.com a little bother.

    3. Re:NY times login generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very Nice! Thanks.

    4. Re:NY times login generator by FattMattP · · Score: 2

      just use the login: slashdotted/slashdotted

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    5. Re:NY times login generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pity it does have url redirection thing, so we could just put the nytimes url in the majcher.com url and it generate a new random l/p every time and load the page.

      That would be a good way to stuff up their precious statistics

    6. Re:NY times login generator by namtog · · Score: 1

      Greetings FattMattP,
      I do not know if the NY times is using something to stop password sharing, but a lot of sites do. Here is the link to a cgi that I think does a pretty good job of stopping password sharing.

  20. Word out of Seattle.. by Flak · · Score: 1

    Is that soon, very soon Cray will be back into this game. It will be very interesting to see, yes indeed.

  21. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    Japs are better at remembering where the fuck they left their shoes. Now AC, tell me why you don't just log in already.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30839&cid=33 15 206

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  22. Australian SuperComputer uses by bug1 · · Score: 1

    If Australia had a supercomputer, what would it be used for ?

    1) Predict travel plans of boat people
    2) Invade people privacy
    3) Helping solve world problems (being a good global citizen)
    4) others ?

    You dont need to a supercomputer to know it wouldnt be 3.

    1. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

      How to make a liver capable of taking in 60 years of alcoholism?

    2. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To edit and falsify movies of boat people throwing their children overboard.

    3. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also could be useful on how to shut Steve Irwin up... maybe it could lure him in to be eaten by crocs...

    4. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problems with boat people? That's easy to deal with. Just sink the bastards and give the sharks something to eat.

    5. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Feed him to the boat people.

    6. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by archen · · Score: 2, Funny

      5) Emulate Grand Theft Auto 3

    7. Re:Australian SuperComputer uses by supermoose · · Score: 1
      Australia's new supercomputer is the pride of the nation!

      In other news, Japanese scientists were disheartened to find several nodes of their new supercomputer had been stolen in the early hours of the morning. Forensics experts are running DNA analysis on the multitude of beer cans found in the computing facility in an attempt to determine the identity of the thieves.

  23. Does this mean.... by boris_the_hacker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...that I will finally be able to run Windows XP at an acceptable rate?

    There needs to be a warning, "Windows XP: Turns your 35.6 teraflop computer into a PC-XT"

    *grin*

    --
    chris at darkrock dot co dot uk
    http colon slash slash www dot darkrock dot co dot uk
    1. Re:Does this mean.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up. XP runs on a 200 great. Even better if you turn off the gizmos.

      Oops! I'm going to get -1 Not Linux Supportive now!

  24. just generate a random login (was: Re:username/..) by haedesch · · Score: 1
  25. Re:Have a great day by rob-fu · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's quite an impressive film career. I didn't know he was such an accomplished actor.

  26. Is he dead or not? Enquiring minds want to know. by GafTheHorseInTears · · Score: 0

    Body found in Seattle home of Alice in Chains singer Layne Staley

    SEATTLE (AP) -- A body was found at the home of Layne Staley, lead singer and guitarist for the Seattle grunge band Alice in Chains.

    The King County medical examiner's office scheduled an autopsy Saturday but investigator Jim Sosik could not immediately confirm the identity of the deceased late Friday night.

    The Seattle Post-Intelligencer quoted unidentified law enforcement sources as saying the body was Staley's.

    The person appeared to have been dead for several days, the P-I reported in Saturday editions.

    Seattle Fire Department spokeswoman Sue Stangl told The Associated Press she could not confirm the identity of the deceased.

    A Seattle police dispatch officer referred inquiries to the police media officer, who did not return repeated pages.

    Like Nirvana and Soundgarden, Alice in Chains was a band prominent in the early '90s Seattle heyday of grunge rock.

    The group's first album, Facelift, was released in 1990 and the band quickly rose to prominence, following with albums including Dirt and Alice in Chains.

    In a 1996 interview with Rolling Stone magazine, Staley spoke of how his drug use influenced his lyrics.

    "I wrote about drugs, and I didn't think I was being unsafe or careless by writing about them," he told the magazine. "Here's how my thinking pattern went: When I tried drugs, they were great, and they worked for me for years, and now they're turning against me -- and now I'm walking through hell, and this sucks."

    --
    "You're just scared like a little white pussy. I'll fuck you till you love me, you faggot!"
  27. So when does a computer... by Bnonn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...become a huge goddamned distributed-network-in-a-room?

    1. Re:So when does a computer... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      So when does a computer... ...become a huge goddamned distributed-network-in-a-room?

      When it scales above the number of processors you can fit on one motherboard.

      Multiprocessing systems are communications-bound for most tasks. The communications network becomes more important than the processor very early on.

    2. Re:So when does a computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A computer is something that can compute things. It shouldn't matter whether the box contains one THz chip, or a million Vic-20's, or smart goblins. If it can solve a dense system of linear equations quickly, then you've got something.

      If you'd try this benchmark on distributed.net, you'd get abysimal performance. So if you view distributed.net as one computer, the benchmark will tell you that as a whole it isn't a fast *computer* (maybe that's what you had in mind). But this Japanese machine probably is.

  28. Processor number & Beowulf by bendl · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, if you look at the number of processor of this supercomputer it's 5104 * 640 = 3.2 Trillion processors.

    I'm not sure that the beowulf approach can follow this performance path. Of course, each processor is more powerfull however, you have to bring electricity and network to all of them (maybe half or a quarter of them if you use multiprocessor motherboard). Here, the number of processor is _huge_ which allow a massive
    parallelization of your code.

    Of course, some can argue that "we can always build a beowulf of those" but as far as I know, it's not really COTS material and I'm not sure it will be true one day.

    Maybe Beowulf will not be able to compete in terms of peak performance. However, for the price it will gives you much more power.

    As a conclusion, I would say that Beowulf are less parallel (even with fast network à la myrynet or infiniband or ...) than those kind of computer. Not all applications can benefit of the NEC supercomputer (same things for the Beowulfs).

    Today NEC is faster and more powerfull but my guess is that it will not last ;-)

    The questions are when and how ?

    1. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
      Well, if you look at the number of processor of this supercomputer it's 5104 * 640 = 3.2 Trillion processors.

      Ahem, I think you meant to say 3.2 Million processors. Not Trillion unless the math from your Universe is different than the math from my Universe.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    2. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by bendl · · Score: 1

      Yes !

      You're absolutely right. French -> english very faulty translation module.

      My point is that it's a very _big_ number for beowulf clusters. The biggest one have 8192 processors ( http://www.top500.org/list/2001/11/)
      and the alimentation and network problem are huge for Beowulf of this size.

      What for 3.2 millions of processors ?

    3. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2
      You're absolutely right. French -> english very faulty translation module.

      Oui.

      My point is that it's a very _big_ number for beowulf clusters. The biggest one have 8192 processors

      Hmmm...I thought that Beowulf referred to separate computers and not processors. So five computers linked together are a Beowulf cluster of five while a single computer with five processors is not a Beowulf cluster of anything but simply a multiprocessor computer, or is this a incorrect interpretation?

      As for the number of processors, I'm sure that they had to make up for the lack of processor speed with sheer numbers. Yuck!

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

    4. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      The whole name of a "Beowulf" cluster is misunderstood anyway.

      A cluster is a cluster, there are many different kind. There is no one kind called a Beowulf.

      Beowulf was the name of a project at NASA that was building clusters out of cheap computers. So I guess any cluster built out of cheap computers is a Beowulf.
      Beyond that, there is no set standard for how a "Beowulf" cluster operates. They all use different librarires, different cabling, etc.Some use PVM. Some just use mosix. Some use other stuff. Etc..

    5. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these....

      SHOVED UP YOUR ASS

    6. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

      ...from the Beowulf Howto,

      " Beowulf is a multi computer architecture which can be used for parallel computations. It is a system which usually consists of one server node, and one or more client nodes connected together via Ethernet or some other network."

      That pretty much explains it. read the howto for lots of fun information.

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    7. Re:Processor number & Beowulf by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2
      Well, if you look at the number of processor of this supercomputer it's 5104 * 640 = 3.2 Trillion processors.
      Uh, no, it has 5120 processors (640 nodes with 8 processors each). It's also not a cluster (at least not in the common sense) as some people have said here. It uses vector processors specially designed for this computer. Each CPU has a memory bandwidth of 32 GB/s, totalling 128 GB/s per node. The nodes are connected via a 640 x 640 crossbar. The cabling for the crossbar alone has a combined length of 5000km and weighs 200 tons.

      Just for comparison, the whole SETI@home network had a performance of 17.6 TeraFLOPS during the last 24 hours.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  29. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even your mind is confused about the
    fact that its confused or not makes you
    i think no really stable!

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31397&thresh ol d=-1&commentsort=0&tid=137&mode=thread&pid=3378725 #3378777

  30. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by ascending · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...I'd like to see the scientific data behind this statement.

  31. Re:1 petaflop?? by blankmange · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Wow - 1 petaflop... Should we be posting our Beowulf cluster posts yet?? Anybody want to jump up and down and claim a first post??

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
  32. 1024 bit encryption? by bsdbrett · · Score: 1

    And we were worried about the NSA cracking 1024 bit encryption?! http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/25/212521 1&mode=thread

  33. Non Weapon Research? Not according to Dr. Evil by satanami69 · · Score: 2

    Evil: "Back in the Sixties I had a weather changing machine that was in essence a sophisticated heat beam which we called a "laser." Using this laser, we punch a hole in the protective layer around the Earth, which we scientists call the "Ozone Layer." Slowly but surely, ultraviolet rays would pour in, increasing the risk of skin cancer. That is, unless the world pays us a hefty ransom."

    Weather research my butt!

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
  34. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is sad to think that by virtue of nationality, it is assumed that a Japanese (or anybody else) is smarter/more clever than any other nationality. I think this racist and defeatist statement should have been posted AC -- so we wouldn't have to store your name along with all the other racists we have to keep track of...

  35. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    AMEN. Like the Backstreet Boys said, Quit Playing Games with my Heart. But log the fuck in first, its better for the environemnt,.

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  36. Render Movies in Real Time? by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

    So, who's got their calculator handy?

    1. Re:Render Movies in Real Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already been done.. Get yourself a set of SGI's Onyx 3800.

  37. Possibilities. by Talinom · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just think, now that they have all of this processing power they can do some of the following:

    1) Make a metal that looks like plastic. Handy for all of those rocket launches.

    2) Genetically engineer large reptiles to guard their country from invaders.

    3) One word: Gundam.

    4) Launch theoretical bombs at ASCI White and see if they can finally win the technology war.

    5) Create a fully aware computer program that will help guard us from ourselves.

    6) Make a fully synthetic actor that can outact, say, Keanu Reeves. (Oh, sorry, that was the Thunderbirds).

    What other possibilities can this thing hold?

    --
    "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Possibilities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) Launch theoretical bombs at ASCI White and see if they can finally win the technology war.

      *beep* *beep* *looks at his watch*

      Damnit, I've been killed. Oh well.

    2. Re:Possibilities. by quannump · · Score: 1
      6) Make a fully synthetic actor that can outact, say, Keanu Reeves. (Oh, sorry, that was the Thunderbirds).

      but Keanu Reeves is a fully synthetic actor.

      --

  38. Re:hmmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait? Hmm... I don't see it but OK. Now how do I start flaming something that isn't flamebait?

    A Beowulf cluster? Are you kidding? You're just a stupid Microsoft Sheep. You couldn't build a beowulf cluster if your life depended on it. Go back to your wussified Start menu and leave us alone.

  39. What about Google? by clion999 · · Score: 2

    The last time I checked, Google had more than 10,000 servers. I realize these aren't tightly coupled, parallel processors, but it's still a massive machine. Is it 10,000 computers or one? I say for the purposes of comparision that it would beat the Japanese computer. If not now, in a few months when Google's installation grows even larger. This piece struck me as a thinnly-veiled ploy to get more cash for some government computer lab.

    1. Re:What about Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a supercomputer. This is what supercomputers look like.

    2. Re:What about Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a total jerk !!! Google cluster and supercomputer are not the same. I can have a billion node distribute database server but won't compete in doing fp calculations !!!

  40. Pictures here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pictures here. so cool!

    1. Re:Pictures here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wish I could be one of the lucky ones who get to manage this wonderful machine.

      I would love to live in that hall with endless rows of ultimate CPU power.

    2. Re:Pictures here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think i saw that same design on poke`mon

    3. Re:Pictures here! by geekinexile · · Score: 1

      Whoah! The House of the Rising Sun!

    4. Re:Pictures here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I love Japan. But I just gotta say... leave it to them to color the world's fastest computer in PASTELS!

    5. Re:Pictures here! by freonfighter · · Score: 1

      looks like a laundromat

    6. Re:Pictures here! by Tablizer · · Score: 1


      Do those Big Red Dots doing anything useful, like dissopate heat, or are they simply a "flag sticker"?

      I have to agree with the comment about the use of pastel colors. But, hey, if they like that over there.....

      BTW, I think I saw the lost Arc of the Covenent in one of those photos.

    7. Re:Pictures here! by mandolin · · Score: 2
      Pictures here [jamstec.go.jp]. so cool!

      Dear ${deity}, it looks like the Answertron 2000..

    8. Re:Pictures here! by isaac_akira · · Score: 2

      http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/gallary/images/17. jpg

      "I'm sorry, Shinji, I'm afraid I can't do that."

    9. Re:Pictures here! by Drizzten · · Score: 1

      Knowing them, I guarantee someone's already dubbed with the names of the Magi in Evangelion. :)

      Those are awesome pictures...

      --

      "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
  41. you skeptics caused this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All you Slashdot Skeptics do is look around the web for articles that bash scientific studies on global climate change, and then post them to Slashdot so that you can publicly make fun of them.

    My current job is with a major American computer manufacturer. I don't want to disclose who they are, but you've heard of them. As an engineer, I review various RFP's from American research programs. For the last 7 years, they've been asking my company to build them a supercomputer that can model the Earth's climate. I approve the proposal, then pass it along to my boss for final approval. In all, I've approved 16 of these RFP's, and my boss has approved NONE. Yes, I'm a little bitter about it. By the way, did I mention my boss reads Slashdot? So do I, and every time there's another "bash climate science article posted," I try to head over the fab room, away from the boss's office, because I know there is going to be a tremendous amount of chortling and cackling as he reads through the Slashdot comments on that article. When I hear that laugh, I know final approval is somewhat unlikely.

    So, Slashdot, thanks a lot.

    Apparently, the Japanese don't read Slashdot. They've been investigating global climate change and other weather related phenomena with a seriousness that we Americans don't have. And now, look at the result. They've got a computer that's 20 times faster than anything we Americans can make.

    And our politicians don't want to let our researchers import the good computers from Japan because of "dumping." Hey, Joe Politics: the Japanese computers are just better. The same politicians won't spend a dime on government sponsored R&D into supercomputers.

    America is going to hell, unless we get back to basics and build better supercomputers designed to study the climate.

  42. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    You keep track of all the racists on slashdot? What are you, some kind of Nazi?

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30638&cid=33 32 845
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31025&cid =3336 426

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  43. The really important application by distributed.karma · · Score: 1

    Somebody forgot RC5 from the application list.

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  44. In other news... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    ... American government (world police) nuke Japanese computing facility because "They were going to use it to build nukes"

    What i don't understand about the whole supercomputer thing is that nuclear weapons were developed in WW2 with no more computing power than a wrist-watch and theres already a whole bunch of test data that anyone can look at.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What i don't understand about the whole supercomputer thing is that nuclear weapons were developed in WW2 with no more computing power than a wrist-watch

      And that's why the Hiroshima bomb was 1.4% efficient. Maybe you should read this Nuclear Weapons FAQ.

    2. Re:In other news... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      1.4% efficient still allowed the yanks to murder a 100,000 people

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:In other news... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      100,000 per bomb isn't enough anymore.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say world police as if it's a bad thing. If the US doesn't do it, who will? The French? South Africa? Spitzbergen?

  45. NGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What have they named this computer?

    Melchavor, Casper or Belphazar?

    To hack it you would need to use the 666 decyption algorithm P

  46. But .... by 2000+Britneys · · Score: 1

    will it run Quake at reasonable FPS ?

  47. ...and other non-weapons research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finaly somme thing nice is been done whit computer.

  48. Isn't this how the nuclear arms race started? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2
    We test one.

    They test one.

    Ad infinitum while the world cringes in fear.

    It's going to get ugly when Cuba starts hosting Japanese built systems.


    [Okay. Lame joke. It sounded better before I typed it, but I'm too attatched to the effort to not post. You're Welcome.]


    -Fantastic Lad

  49. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ha ha... you overfed, under-educated, pizza-chomping asswipes are probably thinking Hiroshima might not have been such a good idea now :)

  50. Re:You do not know what you are talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent post up! What's this -1 bullsh-t.

  51. Exponential? by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 1
    Because increases in computing power tend to have exponential results, a problem that could take years for even the fastest computers today might be finished in hours on the new Japanese computer. (Emphasis mine)
    Could someone explain to me how with only 5 times as many flops as ASCI White, this machine could be hundreds of times faster? Or am I missing something obvious to do with "vector processing"?
    1. Re:Exponential? by doce · · Score: 1

      This is obviously hyperbole. The point is valid, even if their choice of time frames is flawed. Do we need to sit down and learn what "exponential" means?

      --
      woof!
    2. Re:Exponential? by snarkh · · Score: 1

      That is pretty funny. Increases in computing power tend to have logarithmic rather than exponential effect on many problems.

    3. Re:Exponential? by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 1

      It depends on the nature of the problem:

      An exponential increase in computing power say 2^a
      will decrease a problem with complexity of 2^b by some logarithmic ratio (I think, don't have paper, too tired, but if you will, take my word for it).

  52. Imagine a ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jeez, could you imagine a single one of those...

  53. Upcoming Supercomputers by Iberian · · Score: 0

    Faster machines are being designed at government-financed labs in Livermore, Pittsburgh and Los Alamos, N.M., but they are far from operational. That is from the article but I would like to know more about the specs and when they plan to be opperational.

  54. Damn, after all these years.... by lildogie · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...we still operate under this 640 node barrier.

    1. Re:Damn, after all these years.... by supermoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      640 nodes should be enough for anybody.

  55. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it run Quake?!

  56. Do you really have to ask? by w00d · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "All in all, it is a surprisingly large amount for a country that doesn't go into military actions. Who are they defending themselves from?"

    Red China and North Korea, for starters (who both have nukes, BTW). They don't exactly have the friendliest of neighbors over there. They would be stupid not to have a good defensive force.

    1. Re:Do you really have to ask? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy North Korea does not have nukes and Japan-China relations is more like US-Europe relations than two countries that might go to war . The idea off a war between China and Japan is realy quite rediculous if you know anything about their curent diplomatic or trade relations .

    2. Re:Do you really have to ask? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Asia, it's not. You fucking idiot.

  57. CPU affinity by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    make them to fit in my pocket

    Pocket? What's the point of playing Quake in your pocket? Or maybe I shouldn't ask...

    640*5104==3.2M CPUs... so I can dedicate four CPUs to each pixel on a 1024x768 display, and get reasonable Quake performance without hardware acceleration? (-:
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:CPU affinity by ironfroggy · · Score: 1
      without hardware acceleration

      I'd say this would be classified as a bit of hardware acceleration...

  58. New news! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Finally, some new news (as opposed to "this is nothing new").

    Question - why is it that we JUST found out about this? How long did it take to build this giant supercomputer? Companies like IBM talk about what they're building long before they are done. Speaking of which, I guess IBM's Deep Blue is kinda underpowered now, relatively speaking.

    One more thing - why all the hub-bub about US export restrictions re: computer power? If Japan already has this much computing power, who wants our "junk" anyway?
    I lied - one more thing - does the NSA have penis envy over this? Or is their computer still faster? ;)

    1. Re:New news! by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      It was published in Scientific American, I think, about 3 or 4 years ago.

      You *JUST* found out about it because you get your news from a narrow band of news sources.

      This was in Scientific American, or something similar 3 years ago or so, when the project was starting.

    2. Re:New news! by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Which brings an interesting idea to my mind. Maybe Bobby Fischer could come out of hiding and challenge it to a game.
      Never mind the computer would only pick days that would have to be cancelled due to weather emergency.

      Cheers,
      Jonathan

  59. Comutation required for climate/pollution modeling by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It takes about a few weeks on Sun ultra sparcs to simulate a week long air pollution scenario over the north eastern united states. This is assuming a 8x8 km grid (where the 8x8 sqkm area is one "point"). The wind modeling is extremely simplified, and the focus is on a select set of contaminants.

    To do a detailed wind modeling, and have a finer resolution, and to do some statistical analysis of different input conditions... suddenly we end up with requirements far more than the current computing power.

    We can always come up with a problem that is more complex than we can solve using current computing power. That is a good pursuit.

    S

  60. Why the Jappanese built a Supercomputer. by Iberian · · Score: 0

    The economy in Japan right now is suffering pretty bad. The unmployment rate is relatively high at over 5% and has been higher the than US has had at any point in our "recession". So the government decides to pump a few hundred million into the economy while being able to lay claim to the fastet computer in the world, to give the citizens a little consumer confidence in their technoligically supperior country.

  61. Dude, the Japs are gettin' a Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is why is Jap economy is in the shitter. They don't come up with ideas like that anymore.

  62. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot: bombing our allies.

  63. Fast... by ScriptGuru · · Score: 0

    And yet it still takes 30 seconds to start Explorer.

    --
    Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
  64. (-1 wrong) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What surprises me is that this is the first we (Slashdot readers) have heard about it.

    Try again

    1. Re:(-1 wrong) by rlwhite · · Score: 1

      Too bad the links in the slashdot story are broken. The blurb seems to incorrectly imply that IBM was responsible, not NEC.

  65. Hey cool. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I remember seeing this in a magazine a couple years back as a planned project.

    Nice to see it working now.

  66. We've stopped it before, we can stop it again. by ScriptGuru · · Score: 0

    Referenced in Inside the CIA: Japan at one point was actually designing nuclear weapons, but the CIA used political and economical pressure to stop them. If weapons are whan Japan wants, I'm sure we can talk them out of it.

    --
    Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
  67. Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these?! by restive · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, just couldn't resist. :)

    1. Re:Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I find so interresting about this one. Its a cluster of 1000+ node multi-processor systems. I wonder what each of those systems could do alone. How fast could this thing render toy story or ice age? And even though it has all this cpu power where are its limitations? I wonder what bandwidth this thing has been CPU and disk or net. If it can't easily run an entire classroom of UT clients at over 300fps then its worthless.

  68. Warmongers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Haven't you heard the warmongers whining about how we are not able to cope with TWO full scale, simultaneous conflicts anywhere in the world anymore. Waaah!

    Well, now they've got what they wanted. GWB has brought the military spending back to Cold War level while schooling, welfare and public highway system and railroads are deteriorating. But hey, who cares as long as the military industrial complex gets something to do.

    1. Re:Warmongers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "TWO" is two, as in 2, you idiot.

  69. Japan has made the best CPU for long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The three year old cpu Fujitsu VPP5000 appears to outshine anything designed by any American company.

    A single CPU on the STREAM benchmark:

    Fujitsu VPP5000
    Double-precision stream_c

    - Results for STREAM on Fujitsu VPP5000 single processor, Thu Feb 1 11:22:45

    bash-2.03$ uname -p -s -v -m
    UNIX_System_V 3 5000 UXP/V
    bash-2.03$ frt -V
    frt : Fujitsu UXP/V Fortran V20L20 Driver L00091 (Nov 20 2000 18:54:41)
    bash-2.03$ frt -Of stream_d.f
    bash-2.03$ ./a.out -Wl,-Lr

    Double precision appears to have 16 digits of accuracy
    Assuming 8 bytes per DOUBLE PRECISION word
    Array size = 8000000
    Offset = 0
    The total memory requirement is 183 MB
    You are running each test 10 times
    --
    The *best* time for each test is used
    *EXCLUDING* the first and last iterations
    Your clock granularity/precision appears to be 1 microseconds
    Function Rate (MB/s) Avg time Min time Max time
    Copy: 37780.4014 0.0034 0.0034 0.0035
    Scale: 35724.2534 0.0036 0.0036 0.0036
    Add: 34594.5946 0.0056 0.0055 0.0056
    Triad: 37543.9969 0.0051 0.0051 0.0052
    Solution Validates!
    bash-2.03$
    http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/stre am_mail/2001 / 001.html
    ======
    Pentium 4:
    avg, MB/s, of 10 runs:
    copy 1322.85
    scale 1320.12
    add 1514.75
    triad 1508.11

    System: 1.4 GHz Pentium4 with 1 GB PC800 RDRAM, in Intel i850 board
    (homemade system). All 64 RDRAM devices taken, so this is not an ideal
    system r.e. latency.

    Hard disk is 5400 rpm 30 GB Maxtor.

    Executable: exact same as for Asus K7V Athlon 800, which I submitted June 4,
    2000.
    Compiled with Intel C/C++ 4.5, essentially Pentium Pro optimizations (no
    SIMD, no Pentium 4-specific optimizations).

    Ran 10 times in sequence (from batch file), and averaged all 10 for results
    reported above.

    Somehow I forgot to mention the OS: Windows 98 SE.

    http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/stream_mail/20 01 / 000.html

    1. Re:Japan has made the best CPU for long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the www.top500.org!

      The 16 CPU version of this beast beats a 256 CPU version of PIII (1 GHz)

  70. This is very good for lots of reasons by gotak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is great news really. With the supercomputers built for weapons research naturally people doing "normal" research will have problems getting access.

    After all they don't want just anyone poking around and finding things they shouldn't.

    But with non weapons research systems I can see academics from all over the world getting easier access and maybe something interesting can happen.

  71. Pardon? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    640 nodes * 5104 processors is 3266560 processors.

    35.6 teraflops (35600000000000 flops)

    35600000000000/3266560 = 2724579 (2.7 megaflops per processor)

    Where did you get 8 gigaflops from?

    1. Re:Pardon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I QUOTE from the PRESS RELEASE:

      "This is the world's fastest supercomputer configured with 640 nodes (64GFLOPS/node, 5,120 CPUs in total), each of which consists of eight vector processors (8GFLOPS/CPU), and achieves the peak performance of 40TFLOPS (40 trillion floating-point operations per second)."

      That's probably where he gets 8 GFlops from, dipshit.

  72. Of Course You Know.... by vw_bob · · Score: 1

    This means war!!!!

    j/k :) Rock on Japan.

    They're probably using it to find ways to permently get rid of that "I'm Turning Japanesa" song.

  73. NEC's Press Release by s.d. · · Score: 1

    Here's the press release from NEC, from back in March: http://www.nec.co.jp/press/en/0203/0801.html

  74. Re: Possibilities by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Funny
    6) Make a fully synthetic actor that can outact, say, Keanu Reeves.


    Eliza did that several years ago.

  75. Not even close. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    The japanese computer has MILLIONS of processors. Google doesn't even come close to 1/100th of the size.

    Google can NOT do 36.5 TERAFLOPS.

    The japanese computer is bigger than the top 10 US supercomputers combined. DO you mean to say google is bigger than that?

    ANd btw, this project has been in the works for years, I remember reading about it in some science magazine 3 or 4 years ago, when they started the project.

    1. Re:Not even close. by harakh · · Score: 1

      I thought it said alittle over 5000 processors? :). Though Google is built upon "commodity" hardware and tweaked for massive database-stuff and not for scientific calculations. This Japanese computer is a real supercomputer and Google is the worlds largest and fastest database. two totally different things.

    2. Re:Not even close. by s390 · · Score: 2

      The japanese computer has MILLIONS of processors. Google doesn't even come close to 1/100th of the size.

      Wrong, on several counts. The japanese machine is 640 nodes containing 5,104 processers - a little over half Google's size in terms of number of CPUs. And the NEC processors in it are _vector_ processors, as opposed to the scalar processors in Google and US supercomputers (mostly, except for some older Cray machines). Also, Google is a database machine, a very different beast than a scientific supercomputer.

  76. Re:The difference is communication between nodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weather simulation or A-Bomb simulation requires massive communication between each computing node. For example, each node would typically compute about a number of small elements that would need to give information to each other such as temperature and pressure or surrounding elements in order to calculate energy / mass flow. Think of lots of objects communicating with each other on the same node and on other nodes. Google, IMHO, is probably more like an "embarrassly parallel" problem (yep, thats the mathematical term for it). Divide the problem up into many parts and send them to a computing node from a master and then send the answers (lists usually, or empty list) back to the master. Essentially, no communication between the nodes. I suspect that Google lies between the two extremes and very close to embarrassingly parallel.

  77. This computer is so fucking fast that... by donglekey · · Score: 2

    By some rough statistics that I remember, it could render the original Toy Story completely in 30 hours easily. It might not even take that long. Rendering a whole movie in a day, Edwin Catmull would be proud.

    1. Re:This computer is so fucking fast that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To render in 30 hours means it takes less than a second to render each frame. When you think about how much there is in every frame, it becomes very amazing.

  78. How do you convert code to vector fomat? by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    The article mentioned:

    Scientists from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo., said they were planning to work with the Japanese earth simulation center to convert United States weather modeling codes to work with the new computer.

    Would that code most likely be in something like C, C++ or in Fortran or something else entirely? And what kind of changes would you be talking about when adapting it to vector based processors?
    Any mad weather scientists out there like to fill in the lay public on the rough details?

    1. Re:How do you convert code to vector fomat? by distributed.karma · · Score: 1

      FORTRAN 90/95 has built-in vector expressions such as A = sin(X) where A, X are vectors, so it is relatively easy to parallelize. The compiler doesn't have to look for hidden parallelism in FOR loops and the like.

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

    2. Re:How do you convert code to vector fomat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fortran always used to be the dominant language for vector code but C also (I've been away from this game for a couple of years but did spend the best part of 10 years of my professional life "Vectorising" code.)

      The real trick to Vector code is to work with the memory subsystem and not have it permanently trying to catch up with you as in normal processor style.

      You can pretty well put as many floating point units in a modern cpu as you want, the problem is feeding them with data to operate on and storing results. Current microprocessors use multilevel caches to try and keep what it hopes are useful subsets of main memory close to the cpu. Trouble is if you are scanning 100's of GBs of data in a weather model there may be virtually no useful small subsets.

      For vector processing you design a system where, before you actually fire off any calcs, you give the memory system a list of the next 64/128/4096(varies) addresses you plan to use. It may take a little while to get the first one but after that they arrive at 1 per clock per memory pipe and, depending on the number of memory pipes you use you can actually drive your floating point units full speed.

      Because you want to process streams of memory addresses as a single op (vectors) you spend all your time looking for loops where each iteration can be calculated independent of the next and where the compiler can be sure of that with no ambiguity. That tends to mean no subroutine calls, anything a(i)=f(a(i-1)) is bad but a(i)=f(a(i+1)) is fine and even a(i)=f(a(i-65)) can be OK depending on vector register length. You then get into CIGS (compressed index gather scatter) ops like a(i)=b(c(i)) and you can work with that sometimes etc.

      Bottom line, if you don't vectorise high 90%'s of your code the Vector computer is a very expensive room heater. You then need to worry about 99% parallel code+ for multinode architecture but there are similarities between data independence of vectorised loop coefficients and parallel modules.

      HTH

      Crash

    3. Re:How do you convert code to vector fomat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish that there was more technical detail in this article, or on the web site about the computer.

      From the photographs, it's an amazingly large machine. I can't think of anything anyone's actually built that's larger. This makes be very curious about the network that's connecting all of these nodes -- it's got to be extremely low latency, and high bandwidth, but also cover very long distances (100 yards, judging by the photograph). I wonder if they're using something like the Hypertree from the CM-5?

    4. Re:How do you convert code to vector fomat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason that I replied to the original posting:

      One thing that amazed me about Fortran 90 is that the simplicity of the Fortran language makes it easier to parallelize. For example, Fortran has no pointers, and all access to an array element is through array notation. In C, you have pointers, and incrementing a pointer into an array means that you're referring to the next element in an array. Now imagine that you're on a massively parallel, shared nothing computer where the array is spread across thousands of processors; what does incrementing a pointer mean when it's referring to something in memory in another CPU? Sure, you can work through these issues, but it's complex.

    5. Re:How do you convert code to vector fomat? by distributed.karma · · Score: 1
      FORTRAN has had pointers for ages, but they are rarely needed because of other useful features: e.g. array expressions, array subscripts, modules.

      My previous reply was meant to illustrate the language features useful for parallel computing, and I don't really know how the compiler handles them. There is also High Performance FORTRAN specifically designed for supercomputers, but I only have experience on common F90 on unix boxen.

      It should also be noticed that the parallelism required in many applications goes beyond array expressions. A naive example is the distributed.net RC5 contest where each node is more or less independent, and the required bandwidth is a tiny fraction of the local memory bandwidth. Of course this requires that the application is designed for this kind of parallelization.

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  79. Wargames by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2

    WOPR

    "Would you like a nice game of chess?"

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  80. Its probably already been said, but... by meckardt · · Score: 1

    This is comperable to the computing power in desktops we will probably see by 2010.

  81. Eh. This is ordinary news. by WetCat · · Score: 1
    My not-so-ordinary-news:
    * 2002-04-19 22:01:44 DOE is buying a fastest Linux computer ever made (articles,news) (rejected)
    Se la vi. I think Slashdot people should be much more interested in Linux computing and problems and achievements regarding that computing than about some ordinary supercomputing Japanese stuff.

    CNN storyregarding that Linux computer...

    1. Re:Eh. This is ordinary news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, I have to disagree. As far as I'm concerned, a 34 Teraflop computer recognized as the world's fastest is far more interesting than a an 8 Teraflop system that happens to run linux. And why does it matter that it's in Japan?

      Secondly, you're a couple days late, so you might want to check here before complaining.

  82. very impressive, ... by haedesch · · Score: 2, Funny

    but does it open the pod doors when asked to? :-)

  83. Re:Comutation required for climate/pollution model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ... in effect creating more sophisticated
    random number generators with more digits
    of "precision."

  84. Finally! by acumen · · Score: 1

    I knew it, they were building the MAGI system!

    Go Akagi!

  85. couple questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. What is the the operating system running?
    2. How much electricity does it burn?

    Anybody knows?

    1. Re:couple questions by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      "What is the the operating system running?"

      Hyper Operating System.

      graspee

  86. Tom's Hardware by realdpk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm just waiting for Tom's Hardware to write up an article on how to overclock this to get an additional 1,000,000 fps in Quake III.

  87. my karma's at rock bottom anyway so.... by smallblackdog · · Score: 1

    Imagine how fast I could get my PR0N to load up!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH

    --
    Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
  88. Riiiiight... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "...and other non-weapons research."

    Uh-huh. That's what insanely fast monster computers are always used for...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Riiiiight... by shren · · Score: 2

      Global warming research is weapons research. They're just digging for global warming propaganda, a good part of any war machine.

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  89. Bill Gates' reaction by hotchai · · Score: 1

    And asked for his opinion on the new Japanese supercomputer, Bill Gates replied "640 nodes ought to be enough for everybody".

  90. Re:Take that Doppler 10,000 by theBunkinator · · Score: 2, Funny

    All the sudden the most annoying NBC "the only team of certified meteorologists in the Delaware Valley" and "Most accurate forcasting with the Doppler 10,000" seem kind of funny.

    I wonder how far in advance this new supercomputer can predict how far John Bolaris is going to be off in his predictions again (the poor guy made some completely overhyped predictions about a blizzard last year in Philly area).

    Anyhow, hats off, Japan! I'm impressed.

  91. Like that would do anything... by sterno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, so then the Japanese complain about us dumping. Then what? Let's say they win in WTO hearings. How nice for them. Then the US just ignores it. Why? Because we can. What real punishment can the WTO provide?

    The WTO is totally powerless, especially against the US. The only thing it provides is a common forum for working these issues out and for establishing a sort of trade best practices. But when you get right down to it, trade disputes are settled as they always have been, either through discussion, or through various embargoes, tariffs, etc. The WTO may add some legitimacy to a particular countries use of some tariffs, etc, but overall it doesn't provide any significant sanctioning ability.

    That's the funny thing with all of the world governmental bodies. They have no real power, they mostly just serve as negotiating platforms. The real power continues to be held by individual nations and there's no evidence that they'll be giving up that power anytime soon.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Like that would do anything... by America+Uber+Alles · · Score: 0

      Does it take much intelligence to see why people dislike/dispise you so?

      Guess what, we don't care!

    2. Re:Like that would do anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the U.S. has freedom of speech to allow such criticism, unlike many other countries. If you saw how many highly trained professionals come from other countries to stay in the U.S. you might revise your opinions. The best students in many countries are trying to get into our schools. Yeah, the U.S. is imperfect, but if we talk in relative terms, can we really say that the U.S. is worse than say your country (whichever one that might be)?

      Also, the U.S. draws criticism because of our size, wealth and influence. Other nations talk about "spreading the weolth" or having us deploy OUR RESROURCES for THEIR AGENDA, but that just spreads poverty to the US and overtaxes our limited resources (yes they are limited, no matter what you guys think). So, we may be imperfect and make mistakes in international relations, but so has every other big player in the last, say 2000 years. Influence breeds criticism, and second guessing by lesser players. Perhaps if you want to improve the world, your criticism and focus should be directed a bit closer to home next time.

  92. oops :) by sterno · · Score: 1

    Take that first sentance, rephrase as follows:

    Okay, so the japanase complain about us being protectionist and blocking them.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  93. SETI by darketernal · · Score: 1

    Imagine how many SETI@home data units that thing could process in half an hour...!

  94. Perhaps it's to power their new.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    ..MEGA GODZILLA! Complete with rocket launcher arms and jump-jet feet!

  95. This is not a super computer. by red_gnom · · Score: 1
    I have to inform you that, unfortunately all of you guys just happened to be victims of a bad translation from Japanese. I always had a feeling that using babelfish translator is a bad idea. This is not a super computer, but a nicely designed, large locker room of Japanese agriculture factory named "Earth Simulator". Take a look at the pictures and judge for yourselves.

    the factory

  96. Cryptogames not Bombs by jobo66 · · Score: 1

    Seems sort of strange that most folks are most interested in the potential for nuclear weapons research with this latest development. If anyone actually thinks that Japan is interested in furthering nuclear research, they might want to open up the history books to try to understand why they really have no interest in developing nuclear bombs. For anyone that has actually visited Japan, they would realize that they are committed to the removal of ALL nuclear weapons. It's a devastating weapon that should have never been designed. There are those that will argue (and I would agree) that had it not been for the nuclear weapon, WW2 may have had a vastly different outcome. But given the ability to build a "dirty nuke" these days by anyone that has a serious desire to do so, has ramifications that we should hope never comes to pass.... I believe the *real* topic of discussion here should be this significant leap forward with regards to cryptoanalysis. The Japanese are close allies with us in many areas, I suspect there's probably some INTEL sharing going on too.

  97. Tragedy by replay+TV+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a tragedy! A computer soooo fast being wasted on high school junk science projects like global warming.

  98. What is undisclosed though by gelfling · · Score: 2

    OF course you have to assume that under typical black projects the DoE/DoD/NSA is running machines far more complex and powerful than they let on. After all SR-71s were a strategic asset 40 years ago and the performance specs are still largely classified. Similarly with computing. A

    Also keep in mind that several years ago the US govt complained about the French performing nuclear testing under the rubric that they could do it all on a machine. And low and behold only a few weeks ago the DoE 'announced' that they now have the capability to do that, seemingly forgetting that it was previously announced in 1999. So in the intervening 3 years how far do you think they've come.

    You know, there are scads of scientists working for the govt who could probably get on the short list for the Nobel if they were allowed to publically publish... and that's basic research. Imagine what applied engineering looks like..

    1. Re:What is undisclosed though by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      You know, there are scads of scientists working for the govt who could probably get on the short list for the Nobel if they were allowed to publically publish...

      The Nobel I Made Killing More Efficient prize.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  99. sweet jesus with lactating nipples! by joFFeman · · Score: 0, Troll

    think about the speed at which you could create metacreation poser-based pornography with that puppy. or, given its country of origin, imagine the speed at which you could process hentai videos into compact divx files for distribution via the net and/or lan parties.

    --
    "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
  100. global warming??? by kemster · · Score: 1
    "Applications include climate modeling, global warming prediction, and other non-weapons research."

    My God!!? If you're really worried about global warming, turn that computer off! I can't imagine the heat it generates.

  101. 3.2 Million Processors. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People... there are 640 nodes and a total of 5120 CPUs, not 5120 PER NODE, there are 8 CPUs per node and each node can do 64GFLOP (8GFLOP/CPU), that equates to approx 40TFLOP. I has been posted... but here is the NEC press release that makes these facts a little more clear... http://www.nec.co.jp/press/en/0203/0801.html

  102. terrorism, protectionism... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    ...how dare you! i'm appalled! the good ol' USA? never! another cheeseburger? supersize it!

    1. Re:terrorism, protectionism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make mine a double, coke, and a pack of chicken nuggets. STAT!

  103. It's worse than you think: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Here's a book about what the U.S. government is doing. It's worse than you think: What should be the Response to Violence?

  104. total number of processors is 5120 by wapentake · · Score: 5, Informative

    Contrary to rumor,
    the machine is constructed from 640 nodes, with 8 vector processors per node, and 16GB RAM per node. That totals 5120 processors and 10TB memory.

    See http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/eng/outline/outlin e02.html

    Also of note:
    peak performance per processor: 8 GFLOPS
    total peak performance: 40 TFLOPS

  105. Hype by dh003i · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember, when they give you TFLOPS or TOPS values, they're giving you PEAK values.

    In reality, most of the time, performance is way below peak values, even for the algorithms for which the computer was designed to handle. IBM's pacific blue has a peak TFLOPS value around 3.6TFLOPS...but in reality, its usually around 1.2TFLOPS.

    There's no reason to believe this machine will be any different.

    Furthermore, the performance of this machine is likely to sink like a rock when its used outside the area it was specially designed for.

    In other words, the best supercomputers in the world are still the ones made by starbridge systems, which were bought by NASA (I believe the one NASA bought was called HAL 15, or something like that).

    1. Re:Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In reality, most of the time, performance is way below peak values, even for the algorithms for which the computer was designed to handle.

      You mean it's operating performance might be something like 13 TFLOPS? God, I *used* to think this was an impressive machine.

    2. Re:Hype by btellier · · Score: 2
      Uh oh, someone didn't read the article..

      The new computer was formally dedicated last month, and the Japan Marine Science and Technology Center said yesterday that the machine had reached more than 87 percent of its theoretical peak speed.

    3. Re:Hype by apsmith · · Score: 2

      The 35 TFLOPS is a BENCHMARK number on the LINPACK standard (from Jack Dongarra, who rates the worlds 500 top supercomputers). LINPACK does matrix manipulations, and this particular benchmark allows optimization of the matrix size - for this machine the optimal size was about 1 million X 1 million.

      So, it's not a hype number, it's a real benchmark number, comparable to similar numbers from other machines. That said, of course not every application is going to achieve that level of performance.

      --

      Energy: time to change the picture.

    4. Re:Hype by dh003i · · Score: 2

      "Had reached 87 percent of peak"

      So what? 87% of its peak, constantly? Sustained 87% peak performance? I don't think so.

      Probably more like for a specific problem, and not for a very long time, and under specific conditions.

      Pensa FGPA chips are near peak performance CONSTANTLY, on a WIDE VARIETY OF PROBLEMS -- not just the one's they're designed to solve, like this Japanese machine.

      Even if this machine sustained 87% peak performance, that's ONLY for the problems it was designed to solve. Try to apply it to something else, and it will sink like a rock.

      Where as FGPA processors can dynamically adjust to solve any number of problems optimally.

    5. Re:Hype by Claudius · · Score: 1

      That said, of course not every application is going to achieve that level of performance.

      I agree. It should be noted that 10^6 by 10^6 matricies are rather puny, really, considering the scope of the problem they envision running on the machine. I would think that to do high fidelity hydro effectively on the machine they'd need near-peak performance on 10^9 by 10^9 matricies at the smallest. (Even this isn't that big, really--it would correspond to a box 1000 cells to a side for a non-AMR hydro calculation). It will be interesting to see in the years to come what kind of "real world" performance they get on their climate models.

    6. Re:Hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FGPA = Field Gate Programmable Array?

      FGPA is a generic term for chips that can be reprogramed at the gate level into diffeent configurations for different problems etc. They are not necessarily some super high performance chips, althought it is probably that SOME are.

      In other words, this guy is just spooting acronyms to sound authoritative.

      Interestingly, vector type machines (the dominant design in japanese supercomputers) tend to operate closere to their theoretical peak than massively parallel designs (the dominant design in american supercomputers). As pointed out in a post higher up, the japanese machine gets closers to its peak than ASCII white or whatver the american machine was.

      Basically, if this poster can complain that the vector types machines do not come close to their peak performace, then it is even more true of the MPP designs which rely on a massively parallel problem in order to look good.

  106. Good news for humanity by SporkLand · · Score: 1

    Too bad the post on the main page came across as America vs Japan.

  107. Wow... by bobdole369 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This particular picture (from the above links.) is mildly disturbing.


    http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/gallary/images/0 3. jpg

    "I'm sorry, I can't do that Dave...."

    --
    Lousy facepalm.
  108. Bullshit (was Re:More protectionism) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact of the matter is that undocumented immigrant piece-workers soldering hardware backplanes cost more in the U.S. than they do in Japan, because Japan is closer to major poulation centers.

    Face it, Mexico City might be the biggest metropolitan area, but there are 2 billion people as close to Tokyo as Maine is to Honduras. This is a continental phenomenon, not a cultural phenomenon. American and Japanese capatalists are equally willing to exploit the poor so that they might continue to do so.

    However, the advent of some technologies is providing a degree of opportunity to the oppressed. As communication and education technology spreads, democracy is enabled, and assuming democracy spreads, wealth will be redistributed on a more equatable basis. Witness the fate of Ferdinand Marcos of the Philipines, for example.

    With the advent of the WTO, American lawyers should not be able to take such advantage of the local underclass, but the U.S. has seen fit to ignore International Law. When is the last time you saw the ratified treaty, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, actually cited on even footing with the U.S. Constitution, which dictates treaties as equivalent? You do not, because the U.D.H.R. is in conflict with much U.S., State, County, and Municipal law. Plus, the U.S. tends to support Latin American coups and has even mined Nicaraguan harbors.

    I say, let the Japanese throw the book at the U.S., and may the Moore's law march on unimpeded? So what if predicting the weather is a military skill. It is also a picnic dating skill, and love trumps guns.

    1. Re:Bullshit (was Re:More protectionism) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I realize this is an international forum, and my original post was a bit American-Centric. However, your response seems a bit ad hominem.


      The fact of the matter is that undocumented immigrant piece-workers soldering hardware backplanes cost more in the U.S. than they do in Japan, because Japan is closer to major poulation centers.

      Face it, Mexico City might be the biggest metropolitan area, but there are 2 billion people as close to Tokyo as Maine is to Honduras. This is a continental phenomenon, not a cultural phenomenon. American and Japanese capatalists are equally willing to exploit the poor so that they might continue to do so.

      Control of a technology need not depend on being in the top population centers. In the U.S .the leading tech center is not in NYC, LA or Chicago.
      Sure you need a critical mass of population but education centers and infrastructure appear more important which is why the Northern California, NYC, and to a lesser extent Research Triangle and the Pacific Northwest are where the players are.
      I'm referring to where the design process and central decision makers are.

      However, the advent of some technologies is providing a degree of opportunity to the oppressed. As communication and education technology spreads, democracy is enabled, and assuming democracy spreads, wealth will be redistributed on a more equatable basis. Witness the fate of Ferdinand Marcos of the Philipines, for example.

      Please cite references or give supporting information about how tehcnological developments directly led to the overthrow of Marcos, I'm not aware of the facts on this one.

      Redistributing wealth in practice often spreads poverty to the wealthy and provide a modest increase to the poor.


      With the advent of the WTO, American lawyers should not be able to take such advantage of the local underclass, but the U.S. has seen fit to ignore International Law. When is the last time you saw the ratified treaty, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, actually cited on even footing with the U.S. Constitution, which dictates treaties as equivalent? You do not, because the U.D.H.R. is in conflict with much U.S., State, County, and Municipal law. Plus, the U.S. tends to support Latin American coups and has even mined Nicaraguan harbors.

      The mining of Nicaragua's harbors and the behavior of the U.S. sponsored troops was not good, I agree. However, if you are so hot on allowing other countries to restrict sovereignty, I hope that your country is obeying EVERY UN TREATY AND MANDATE, and SENDS ITS FAIR SHARE OF RESOURCES every time the UN says someone should step in. The fact that we have a strong local law and tradition in our country doesn't mean that we have to go against our self interests every time some other country or block of countries wants us to. That is what sovereignty is, if you are so keen on sovereignty, perhaps you ought to start by respecting U.S. sovereignty!

      I say, let the Japanese throw the book at the U.S., and may the Moore's law march on unimpeded? So what if predicting the weather is a military skill. It is also a picnic dating skill, and love trumps guns.

      Yeah, weapons research is a very limited sense of vision, I would have liked to see the ASCII machines open for a more interesting project suite. However, having the U.S. roll over and allow Japanese dominance in HPC is not good for U.S. interests, and I'm not sure the E.C. for example would rather have Japanese dominance in the semiconductor industry. I believe that the U.S. is more open to technology sharing than Japan but that is just a belief.
  109. Homepage for the Japanese supercomputer by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/
    is the homepage of the Earth Simulator.

    In the middle of
    http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/pc/docs/2002/ya jium a/
    you can find some report(Japanese) and pictures of it.

  110. enough with the Quaking already by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    when you finally grow up, you may discover that 99% of the computers ever made have been constructed for some other purpose than playing a deathly boring first person killing game.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:enough with the Quaking already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, the really powerful ones were made for Chess

  111. The second URL is incorrect, /yajiuma/ is correct by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    The correct URL of the second is
    HERE

  112. 35 teraflops. Wow! by Utopia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is faster than the SETI network.
    SETI operates at 17 teraflops, but at a cost of only $500000.

    1. Re:35 teraflops. Wow! by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

      well, the SETI people may be fronting 500k but how much are we volunteers paying in electricity? :-)

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    2. Re:35 teraflops. Wow! by Utopia · · Score: 1

      Totally agree.

      But If you keep your computer on, you are wasting electricity anyway.
      Personally, I think SETI is a waste of time.
      I would rather use the spare CPU cycles on humanitarian efforts like Medical Research

    3. Re:35 teraflops. Wow! by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

      right. If I didn't run services off of my computer as part of a learning process, I wouldn't keep it on. But I can't afford hosting at this point, so I keep it on. And no, using my ISP's http://www.foo.reallylong.url.com/users/~username/
      is not acceptable! :-)

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  113. Lemme guess.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmm...

    Maybe they could make the next Pokemon game for this system (gosh, that would mean thousands more pokemons, each with a DNA, Real-time rendered evolutive 3D model and maybe even a logical answer to how a goddamn rat can throw electricity without frying his own self!)

    Or another scenario would be them using this technology to simulate the western music market. They could use this info to calculate how to make J-Pop popular in the West (that would be really evil; worse than an atomic bomb).

  114. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by shren · · Score: 2

    We're wondering why you just don't log out already.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  115. No. YOU'RE the idiot, fucktard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to bust in on your well-earned inferiority complex induced hissy fit because you are of some subhuman nationality. BTW, what is it? Are you euro trash? Are you an Arab sand nigger?

    Since you of such low intelligence and cannot garner 3rd grade level reading comprehsion, you will not notice that there NO reference to neutrality in the above post. It was simply an explanation as to why Japan cannot build up a military.

    Now go strap some dynamite to your 6 year old sister/sex partner like a good little third worlder. You don't have the guts to be a "martyr" yourself.

    1. Re:No. YOU'RE the idiot, fucktard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tee hee.

      "Sand nigger".

      Funny.

  116. Re:You do not know what you are talking about by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
    First off, it was a single line comment only semiserious. Second, you say I don't know what I'm talking about, and you quote an article (as you put it, "I like to cut and paste") that contains:

    Nuclear weapons are the most sensitive issue in Japan, Japanese people are strongly against it. Since the nuclear accident in Ibaraki Prefecture in 1999, the most serious nuclear leakage accident, Japanese citizens have lost confidence about nuclear industry, they asked governments to reduce or stop nuclear power plant construction.

    So how, exactly, do I "not know what I'm talking about"? --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  117. Bullshit! by ellem · · Score: 0, Troll

    Those fukkers in Japan are sick little monkeys! Have you ever seen their cartoons? I'll bet they're using 35 terflops to create a wild NAZI fuck machine (ala Uroto Suki Doji.)

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  118. +5 Funny ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't be serious.

    Tell me, you are not serious...

    Oh, shit, you are serious.

  119. Tetsuo! by PanDuh · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for this thing to develop an A.I., sprout tentacles, become mobile then rumble out and start to destroy Tokyo.

  120. And then it said... by cappadocius · · Score: 0, Redundant
    ...has built the world's most powerful supercomputer

    And the answer it gave: 42.

    --

    omnia tua castra sunt nobis

  121. HAL9000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do all of those boxen look like blue clones of HAL9000?

    Mommy, I'm scared...

  122. Gobsmacking! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    What a monster! Should dominate the number one spot at Top500 for some time! :)

    I should imagine a computer system of this power will have the US Government a little concerned.. I shouldnt imagine it will be long before they announce that they have designed a 'more powerful' system though :)

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  123. Japan has the largest NON-CLASSIFIED box by AIXadmin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would not suprise me if the US all ready had a petaflop of super computing power or more in one machine. The box might sit down at some government agency like the NSA (the worlds largest employer of mathmaticians) and be classified so that no person without a clearance and need to know will ever know about it. At least for thirty years or so.

    Disclaimer:
    I have no clearance , so this is sheer speculation on my part.

    1. Re:Japan has the largest NON-CLASSIFIED box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your granny's the Beatles ?

  124. Yes but.... by hyeh · · Score: 1

    Will it run Linux?

  125. Imagine a... by finity · · Score: 1

    non-beowulf cluster of those.

    Haha...
    ok, not funny I guess.

  126. in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modesty is natural while blowing your own horn is shameful.

    1. Re:in Japan by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (* In Japan modesty is natural while blowing your own horn is shameful. *)

      Sounds like a better place to buy a used car.

  127. Japan and weapons. by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, according to their treaty, Japan isn't even ALLOWED to research nuclear weapons.

    They also aren't able to send troops out in certain situations (they couldn't help us in Afghanistan, except with some money/equipment/civillian work).

    1. Re:Japan and weapons. by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      They also aren't able to send troops out in certain situations (they couldn't help us in Afghanistan, except with some money/equipment/civillian work).

      Which is a shame, because, as I pointed out to a friend the other day, Japan is about the only first world country that *doesn't* have a cultural heritage heavily vested in Israel. They would make a perfect neutral police force, with both a consideration for the historical value of the area, and no favoritism towards either group.

      Okay, not really, but it's one of those "it looks really good on paper" plans.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Japan and weapons. by leucadiadude · · Score: 2

      You forget the Swiss. I believe they could be a pretty good neutral police force.

    3. Re:Japan and weapons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ireland, too - although some people haven't got it through their thick skulls we're not part of Britain. :-(

    4. Re:Japan and weapons. by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ireland and Switzerland both have cultural heritages based on western civilization, last I checked, and western civilization has had a profound influence from the historical events that have occured in Israel. They are not culturally neutral, last I checked. A wee bit more Christians than Muslums or Jews.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  128. Good for them. by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    The Japanese are known for their competitive spirit. I say, "Good for them" on the computer they have made. Give credit where credit is due. Now, it's your turn to make/create something worthwhile.

  129. Related stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know that skit on Conan Obrien where he shows that a story in the back of the paper is humorously related to a story in the front?

    Front page story: Computer generated child porn legalized.

    Back page story: Japan builds fastest computer.

  130. Re:Not keen? by Tablizer · · Score: 1


    (* He said the introduction of democracy to China was essential to world peace. *)

    That way they *vote* to kick our butts. Although being a democracy seems to overall reduce agression, it is no guarentee. India still wants to kick Pakistan's butt for some reason.

  131. an NEC info page from march 8 2002 by traveler359 · · Score: 1

    http://www.nec.co.jp/press/en/0203/0801.html

    mostly the same info already mentioned but
    does offer a few pics

  132. hehehe by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    computing power equivalent to the 20 fastest American supercomputers combined

    That they know of...
    hehe

    Magius_AR

  133. And just like ye olde iMac... by RandomCoil · · Score: 1

    ...they come in different colors! I wonder which is faster: the green or the blue ones?

    I'm going to wait until the charcoal DV version comes out... it should be faster.

  134. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    You speak as if you're more than one person. I like that, I like that a lot.

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  135. Interconnect speeds by kikta · · Score: 2

    I believe it has to do with the interconnects. While a cluster's many nodes may be talking to each other at 1 Gbps, or whatever, these speeds don't work for a supercomputer like this. A cluster or distributed network is good for jobs that can be split up easily. For example, SETI@home or load balancing servers. However, this is the world of simulations. Like people were pointing out during our discussion on ASCI White, the entire environment of the simulation must be calculated simultaneously. You can't calculate what is going on at point (x1,y1,z1) at time t1 and then move on to (x2,y2,z2) at time t1 becuase the two are touching and interdependant on each other. This is true for every point in the simulation's scope. Therefore, the processors have to have an interconnect speed that will allow them to act as if they are all on the same bus and process data simultaneously for all points before moving on to the next time increment.

    Of course, I am only a lowly CS student and I'm sure that someone out there can give a more detailed explanation. Thanks.

  136. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> What surprises me is that this is the first we (Slashdot readers) have heard about it.

    Aha, but we can use JPEG, I just read! I wonder if those japs know about this incredible secret?

    OTOH, maybe MS is now asking itself if that XBOX provocation was indeed a good idea...

    With such a computer we could customize a little more than Quake players skin... how about tweaking a monster's DNA? Talk about bloat!

  137. Consistency by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1
    Jeez. I submitted this thing 6 hours earlier and was rejected. *sigh*

    2002-04-20 06:27:35 [-0000] World (Fastest Super Computer) x 20: Japan 1, US (articles,news) (rejected)

    The NY Times free reg.is reporting on Japan's thunderbolt in the supercomputing wars: ``Japanese laboratory has built the world's fastest computer, a machine so powerful that it matches the raw processing power of the 20 fastest American computers combined and far outstrips the previous leader, an I.B.M.-built machine.'' Quoting an American scientist on his schock at the news: `` `In some sense we have a Computenik on our hands,' said Jack Dongarra, a University of Tennessee computer scientist'' The piece is short on technical bits, but broaches on the _fad_(?) of American designers away from specialized CPUs and toward off-the-shelf versions. Hubris/complacent thinking, IOW. Heck, and I was feeling good about trying the new GNU/Linux beowulf distros out there just ten minuten ago. *yikees*
    Suckmydick. :)
  138. Re: Terminator and The Matrix by fferreres · · Score: 2

    We now know WHO really started it all. From the press release:

    "Blue Gene/L will also be a part of IBM's research in "autonomic computing", an initiative to design computer systems that are self-healing, self-managing and self-configuring."

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  139. NURV by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Every body knows NURV is non-nuclear but still weapons oriented. The Eva's are all there to save us against the angels when they come.... they are pro gay too, their main pilot is gay. His name is Shinji.

    So this new supercomputer will be the driving force behind the desing team of the next-generation of Evas.... a new tomorrow awaits us....
    CC

    --
    NO SIG
    1. Re:NURV by zapfie · · Score: 1

      You mean NERV? =P

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
  140. fuzzy definition, if you ask me by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    (* A cluster or distributed network is good for jobs that can be split up easily. For example, SETI@home or load balancing servers. However, this is the world of simulations.....[but] the entire environment of [certain] simulation must be calculated simultaneously. You can't calculate what is going on at point (x1,y1,z1) at time t1 and then move on to (x2,y2,z2) at time t1 becuase the two are touching and interdependant on each other. *)

    This sounds like the definition of "largest supercomputer" depends on *what* you are calculating. The SETI project could qualify as the largest if not doing the "touch-heavy" kind of simulations you talk about.

    Perhaps "the largest supercomputer for X-type calculations", but maybe not for Y-type.

    It sounds like Japan is trying to have "the biggest" simply for the sake of bragging rights (perhaps as advertizing for country industry of a sorts). Japanese culture tends to have a fascination with "the largest". This is why Tokyo is so big, not to mention Sumo wrestlers. They got themselves into hot water by purchasing some big-name American landmarks/industries in the late 80's, only to watch them not produce profits. (Note that every culture has its own silly quirks, like our rabid lawyers, so I am not picking on their entire culture, just one aspect.)

  141. ENVIOUS US by alexborges · · Score: 1

    C'om on.....its not the end of the world guys..

    So, the japs have a large boxen somewhere and beat mighty america at something other than delivering pizza under 30 mins.... big fucking deal...

    You guys are sudenly so much more sensitive at the rest of the world having leadership at anything....

    Buzz off....japs rule for having their neat thingie.... no need fo america to have a larger box somewhere or anything...its just a damn weather box too...

    Alex

    --
    NO SIG
  142. the nature of geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i sometimes feel that slashdot is
    too much nationalistic, i mean "simple"

    maybe i feel it often

    coward

  143. Sun's endevours by Ironfist_ironmined · · Score: 1

    They just had to be better than them ;).

    --
    0xC3
  144. Applications by aelvin · · Score: 1

    Applications include climate modeling, global warming prediction, and other non-weapons research.

    ... and Word 2003, which no doubt will require a machine of this stature to just run that annoying little animated Helpy Helperton thing that everyone immediately turns off.

  145. Yet another EVA post. by _Knots · · Score: 1

    So we should start calling this the first of the Oracles?

    -Knots

    --
    Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
  146. Ah, but.. by StoatBringer · · Score: 1

    ...will it excite the aliens like a Pentium 4 does?

    --
    Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
  147. an american bomber pilots perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://zmag.org/zmag/articles/barzinn.htm

    I want you to talk about your World War Two bombardier experience. I've heard you discuss it in public lectures, and you write about it. There were two missions in particular that you always mention, one over Pilsen in Czechoslovakia and the other in France in the town of Royan. Why are they so important to you?
    These things weren't important at the time. I was another member of the Air Force doing my duty, listening to my briefings before going out on the flight and dropping the bombs where I was supposed to, without thinking, where am I dropping them? What am I doing? Who lives here? What's going on here? I flew the last missions of the war. By then we were well into Germany. We were running out of targets, and so we were bombing Eastern Europe. I dropped bombs on Hungary. I remember the raid on Pilsen. A lot of planes went over. I remember reading about the raid after the war. It was described by Churchill in his memoirs as, Well, we bombed Pilsen and there were very few civilian casualties. Then I was in Europe years after that, sometime in the mid-1960s, in Yugoslavia. I ran into a couple from Pilsen. Hesitantly, I told them that I had been in one of the crews that bombed Pilsen. They said, when you finished the streets were full of corpses, hundreds and hundreds of people killed in that raid. It was only after the war that I began to think about the raids I had been on. The thing about being in the Air Force and dropping bombs from 35,000 feet is that you don't see anybody, human beings, you don't hear screams, see blood, see mangled bodies. I understand very well how atrocities are committed in modern warfare, from a distance. So there I was doing these things.
    The raid on Royan was an even more difficult experience for me as I thought about it later. It was a situation where the war was just about over, a few months before the end of the war. We thought we weren't going to fly any more missions, because we had already overrun France, taken most of Germany, there was virtually nothing left to bomb, and everybody knew the war was going to be over in a few weeks. We were awakened at one in the morning, the usual waking up time if you're going to fly at six. It's not like in the movies where you leap out of bed into the cockpit, rev up the engines and you're off. Five boring hours of listening to briefings, getting your equipment, putting on your electrically heated suit, going to the bombardiers' briefing, the officers' briefing, going to eat and deciding whether you eat square eggs or round eggs. They briefed us and told us we were going to bomb this little town on the Atlantic coast near Bordeaux, a town called Royan. They showed it to us on the map. Nobody asked why. You don't ask questions at briefings. To this day I feel ashamed that it didn't even occur to me to ask, Why are we doing this when the war is almost over? Why are we bombing this little French town when France is all ours? There were a few thousand German soldiers holed up near this town, waiting for the war to end, not doing anything, not bothering anybody. But we were going to destroy them.
    So twelve hundred heavy bombers were sent over. I didn't know how many bombers were sent. All I knew was my squadron of twelve bombers were going over. I could see other squadrons. It wasn't until later, when I did research into it after the war, that I realized that it was twelve hundred heavy bombers going over against two or three thousand German soldiers. But they told us in the briefing, You're going to carry a different time of bomb in the bomb bay. Not the usual demolition bomb. You're going to carry canisters, long cylinders of jellied gasoline. It didn't mean anything to us, except we knew jellied gasoline would ignite. It was napalm.
    It was only after the war that I began to think about that raid and did some research and visited Royan. I went into the ruins of the library, now rebuilt, and read what they had written about it. I wrote an essay about that bombing. It epitomized the stupidity of modern warfare and how the momentum of military machines carries armies on to do the most atrocious things that any rational person sitting down for five minutes and thinking about it would stop immediately. So we destroyed the town, the German soldiers, the French also who were there. In one of my essays I coupled it with the bombing of Hiroshima as two bombings that at the time, I ashamed to say, I welcomed. With Royan it wasn't that I welcomed it, I was just doing it. With Hiroshima I welcomed it because it meant that the war would end and I wouldn't have to go to the Pacific and fly any more bombing missions.

    1. Re:an american bomber pilots perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great shit! You mean war is unpleasant? People die? We've got to stop it!

      Giiive Peeeeaaacceee A... Chaaaaance!

      Come on, people now! Smile on your brother, everybody get together and Stop The War! Hugs Not Bombs, Flower Children!

  148. He is absolutely right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I am from Japan. He is absolutely right. The translation is indeed sloppy, and the original text does not say anything about computer, but locker room.

  149. Military vs. Defense Force by ryochiji · · Score: 1

    Japan does have a relatively large defense buget, and a lot of modern weaponry (Aegis class missile cruisers, AWACS, etc). However, they go through great lengths to ensure that the hardware they have is "defensive" in nature.

    For an example, back in 1998, N. Korea launched a rocked that passed over Japan and landed somewhere in the Pacific. For a while, the Japanese thought (and I know this because I was there) it was an experimental missile launch, and were generally threatened by it. I remember reading an article in some magazine saying how it would be impossible for the SDF to strike at North Korean missile sites, even in self defense. This is because without air refueling capabilities or aircraft carriers, none of the strike aircraft in their arsenal would be able to reach North Korea and return back to base. Needless to say, Japan does not possess long range cruise missles or surface to surface missiles suitable for such a task.

    In some ways, I think the SDF is only for show. The only thing they can effectively defend against is a small scale invasion, for which the threat is practically non-existent. But then, I guess most nations have armies that are either self fufilling or self defeating in purpose anyway.

    As for nuclear weapons, I'll say this as a native Japanese speaker and someone who understands the land, people and culture: it won't happen in our life time. Sure, Japan has all the necessary technologies to slap up an ICBM in no time flat. But the public/political support for such a move is simply not there... in fact, even suggesting nuclear armament would probably be suicidal for a politician.

    With regards, to Article 9 of the constitution (the one banning all wars)... The constitution was written after WW2 (in 1945), and hasn't been ammended (at least it wasn't the lats time I checked), even though there is an article (54 or 56, can't remember which) that specifically allows for ammendments. Why? Because the public (and politicians) feared that making ammendments to the constitution at all would eventually lead to ammendments to Article 9. So they stuck with an outdated constitution for a long, long time. Perhaps that'll help you understand how sensitive this subject is in Japan (and calm fears among some of you who still seem to think that Japan's just itching to go to war or something).

    1. Re:Military vs. Defense Force by Drizzten · · Score: 1

      ...even suggesting nuclear armament would probably be suicidal for a politician.

      Not really true.

      --

      "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
  150. flamebait: US:bombs vs. Japan: environment by phoebe · · Score: 1
    Wake up, the US is spending billion$ on nuclear weapon research, and only a tiny fraction of their budget on non-lethal technology.

    I think you'll find ideally the US would go to war with weapons that would annihilate all life and leave all buildings and weapons.

  151. Re:Not keen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pakistan is full of psychotic muslim wierdos who would destroy any democracy they could - don't forget, if the people are running a country, Allah isn't...

  152. 4 Canadians killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a joke... Canadians are outraged by the deaths of the 4 Canadian men who died and 8 who were injured because an American F16 mistakenly dropped two bombs on them...

    I find it interesting how little is said about it in the American media... meanwhile Canadian press coverage is all over this... Americans won't even let the Canadians interview the Pilot directly. Meanwhile if an American died it'd be so outrageous and all over the frontpage news... Americans only seem to care about themselves... sorry to say that.

    1. Re:4 Canadians killed by hackerjoe · · Score: 1
      Meanwhile if an American died it'd be so outrageous and all over the frontpage news...
      er, in the 4 page globe-and-mail friendly fire insert, it indicated that so far there have been 36 american friendly-fire deaths. I didn't see those reported in the canadian news..
  153. Real numbers by ryochiji · · Score: 1

    According to their press release: http://www.es.jamstec.go.jp/esc/jp/press/020418.ht ml

    Peak: 40 TFLOPS
    Actual: 35.61 TFLOPS

    They also give some numbers for ASCI White:
    Peak: 12.288
    Actual: 7.226

    Unless they're lying in the press release statement, it seems like more than just hype.

  154. The "real" fastest computer in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The fastest computer in the world is not known, or at least not known by many. When is the last time the U.S government or any other for that matter told people about their computers. Information about computers used in WWII and just after are JUST NOW becoming unclassified. The amount of money needed to build computers like this for the U.S. government is paltry. Remember the U.S. governement rounds all numbers by the millions.

    The article should describe the world's fastest publicly known computer.

  155. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

  156. Seti anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there is a seti client of it...

  157. How about a Nice Game O' Chess? by puto · · Score: 1

    Well it doesn't look any fancier than the WOPR in Wargames. I mean come on. Mathew Broderick had an account on the really big iron. He could play chess, talk to it, and even nuke the world.

    I will be really impressed when our real life computers can do what the ones in our fave movies can do.

    Wargames - Talking Box with Nukes

    2001 - HAL was good and Evil and was a great alarm clock. (possibly a code branch of Windows)

    Hacker - When do I get a chick who looks like Angelina Jolie in spandex and who punches code? OK, ex girlfriend was one but dont want my site slash dotted.

    And my all time favorite who is not a computer. Bender from Futurama. A fully aware intelligence that will drink beer, steal your money, and tell you to bite his shiny metal ass?

    Call me when our boxen can do any of things. I would like to know. Make all of our time in front of the CRT more enjoyable.

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  158. No probs, 13.6 TB US "grid" system is coming... by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    The US (and Japan) has moved beyond isolated supercomputers to grid computing. Check out TeraGrid.org for a description.

    The grid they are building will be four times as powerful as the system described in this article.

  159. Lets not forget their forray into chemical weapons by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    Lest we forget, General Ishi tested chemical weapons on hundreds of thousands of Chinese in WW2. He was brought over to advance US efforts after the war, much in the same way Von Braun was brought over from Nazi Germany to advance US rocketry.

  160. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope....I am thinking I wish I knew where your house is, and to have a tactical nuke in the area to show you my sentiments. ;-)

  161. 5120 _TOTAL_ CPUs Across 640 Nodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps, one reason that the Japanese are ahead of the Americans is that we Americans cannot read a simple press release. It does not say 5120 CPUs per node. The release says 8 CPUs per node, totaling 5120 CPUs across 640 nodes.

    But don't become uptight. We all know that Japanese technology is just a twist or adaptation of Western technology. We are #1, and we always will be #1.

    I prefer _WHEAT_ over rice any day of the week.

  162. There's something you don't know about this!!! by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    This is actually the prototype for the Playstation 3 which Sony is contracting out to NEC.

    NEC have figured out that if they can simulate the enitre earth on this hardware, then it's capable of rendering any game imaginable.

    Now all they have to do is shrink it in size ;-)

    -marc

  163. distributed.net by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Can I put a distributed.net client on it? Gotta find the key...gotta find the key...

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  164. Re:Not keen? (semi OT) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    (* Pakistan is full of psychotic muslim wierdos who would destroy any democracy they could - don't forget, if the people are running a country, Allah isn't... *)

    But they are not currently running the country, at least not most of it.

    Besides, how exactly would India solve that if it was true?

    Nuke the whole country just to get rid of the psychopath fanatics? I doubt that would work. It would just invite more "martyrs" to bother you from other countries with psychopath fanatics. IOW, trigger their "victim gland"

  165. Re: Possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the galaxy's most popular celebrity, Sharon Apple ...

  166. Quaking in my boots by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    the really powerful ones were made for Chess

    In realtime 3D with blood and swords and genuine terrified screams as a pawn is ridden down by a knight... (-:
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  167. Quake, quake, out for a duck by leonbrooks · · Score: 2
    when you finally grow up

    I'm 39, have at least three children, and earn $120 an hour for consulting. And rarely get to play Quake, which I do admire for its, uh, execution.

    99% of computers ever made have been constructed for some other purpose than playing a deathly boring first person killing game

    Yeah, running viruses, apparently... oops, Billy boy only has 94% of the desktop. Does Quake exist for the Mac? If so, we could probably go pretty close to 99% at least capable of it, if not actually designed to do it. Tell me with a straight face that all of those 3D cards ship for use only in CAD workstations.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  168. Links to Japan's Super Computer by dsoltesz · · Score: 1
    Haven't seen the links to the actual computer (Earth Simulator) site yet, so here they are: I can't account for the 16 missing processors - possibly the 640 nodes include not only processing nodes but also various management/admin nodes that do not have the full 8 processors. Maybe it's just mis-information that propagated through the news. If someone finds better as-built specs, drop me a line.
  169. SLASHDOT IS RACIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Slashdot email:
    Japan Builds World's Fastest Computer
    from the rice-rocket dept..
    Isn't 'rice rocket' racist? If some black guy's had made this computer would you have called it NIGGER ROCKET?

  170. SLASHDOT IS RACIST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Slashdot email:
    Japan Builds World's Fastest Computer
    from the rice-rocket dept..

    Isn't 'rice rocket' racist? If some black guy's had made this computer would you have called it NIGGER ROCKET?

  171. Re:Huge US budget for saving lives? by blitz77 · · Score: 1

    No, not really... For example, take the Gulf war. It was supposed to be a high tech war, using "smart" weapons. In actual fact, later on a senior US military official admitted that only 7% of the weopons dropped on Iraq during the war were "smart"... and from other documented sources, 70% of the not "smart" weopons missed their targets completely causing "collateral" ie civilian casualties. From journalists such as the famous John Pilger in his hidden agendas book, we find that in fact during the Gulf war over 250 000 people died, of which only a fraction were military, the rest civilian. When I talked to a sales person about what the Hawk planes do, and many other weopons, they had such stuff as copper dust which is meant to be inhaled into the lungs to kill lots upon lotsa people, Napalm B is made from benzene, polyethylene which burns on contact with skin and almost impossible to get off, killing slowly and painfully. And u call this saving people's lives? more like torturing the remnants of their lives.

  172. Re:Take that Doppler 10,000 by whosit · · Score: 1

    Hehe, love that Guy. I ended up taking 2 days of work off waiting for the snow.

  173. Seti by Fornoth · · Score: 1

    And you that getting a few SETI Work Units for your small fleet, imagine trying to run 5000+ processes at once.

  174. Radical application. by Erris · · Score: 2
    Furthermore, the performance of this machine is likely to sink like a rock when its used outside the area it was specially designed for.

    I'm told it will push a winmodem at 55 kbs.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  175. Reset Button by jonhirsch · · Score: 1

    With all that power you need a big MF reset button.

    1. Re:Reset Button by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (* With all that power you need a big MF reset button. *)

      Leaning janitors are their biggest cause of down-time :-)

  176. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by shren · · Score: 2

    I wager I'm not alone in wishing you'd just go away.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  177. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0


    Oh my word! That would be a fairly safe bet, wouldn't you say, you fucking high roller? Do feel free to join the longdong haters society, you homochimpsexual. You remind me a lot of Gary Sandy, TV's beloved Andy Travis of WKRP fame and Ohio's favorite son. He never could deal with trying to live up to the Donny Most standard of excellence.

    Duh, on second thought, after 405 posts in a couple of months, I think you've finally convinced me to give up the troll lifestyle. How'd you do it, shren? How'd you get me to stop? These are serious questions I will certainly still be pondering weeks from now, on the eve of my next hundred posts.

    So sez Donny Most, TV's beloved Ralph Malph Alpha of Happy Days fame. No, I will not sign your titz so please pull your shirt back down.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31072&cid=33 40 704

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  178. Another fast Japanese computer by mattr · · Score: 2
    This Earth Simulator has been in the works for a long time too, it's not like it popped into existence all of a sudden. It's supposed to simluate the weather of the entire planet. Cool!

    Another computer you may be interested in is Grape-6 which is a 48 Tflop accelerator for gravitational calculations, developed at U. Tokyo for astrophysics. The creator won the Gordon Bell Award a couple years ago.

  179. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by shren · · Score: 2

    bite

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  180. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    me.

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  181. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by shren · · Score: 2

    no.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  182. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    Oh you are such a tease! This is getting erotic!

    Make me feel dirty again. Baby, hit me one more time.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31074&cid=33 40 810

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  183. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by shren · · Score: 2

    yawn.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  184. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    What, you don't want to keep going?

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  185. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by shren · · Score: 2

    No, I just don't live in front of a computer. What were we talking about again?

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  186. Re:Japanese are just smarter and more resourceful by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

    Sexy young children, and the Cincinnatian karma whores who love them.

    Oh, Timmah.

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!