Slashdot Mirror


Information Valuation - The Most Buck for the Bits?

Rational asks: "I've heard of Everquest accounts sold for upwards of a thousand dollars... Considering that what is actually for sale is just an username and password, which generally comes up to less than 20 bytes in total, this amounts to over $50 per byte. What are the most expensive pieces of information that you have heard of, in dollars per byte? Perhaps satellite pictures? The Human genome?"

505 comments

  1. Goat Sex by T3kno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Judging from the number of time's I've been suckered into looking at it, and that someone somewhere is paying for each of those views, I'll bet that the aggregate cost for Goat Sex is in the trillions.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    1. Re:Goat Sex by queequeg1 · · Score: 1

      Let's add to this cost the inevitable result of after employees/spouse/etc have been unable to explain why this site was accessed ("No really, I didn't know!"). Downtime searching for a new job, alcoholism after wife kicks you out of house, etc.

    2. Re:Goat Sex by packeteer · · Score: 1

      ITS A GOATSE.CX FP... MOD IT DOWN QUICK... wait... my caffeine jsut arrived from think geek and im a little to quick to hit the flame button...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:Goat Sex by Tempura_Roll · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm selling all my Slashdot karma 50 accounts for $1/each. Any takers?

    4. Re:Goat Sex by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0

      I'll write you a check.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    5. Re:Goat Sex by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Where's the fun in that?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  2. Credit Card Numbers by elphkotm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People with credit card limits in excess of several million dollars, their number sequence and expiration date can be stored in just a few bytes (8 bytes at the most).

    --

    <Amanda`> I just went out to the parking lot in my bathrobe to exchange warez CDs.
    1. Re:Credit Card Numbers by YourFavoriteBandSux · · Score: 1, Funny

      Can individuals actually *get* a credit limit in the millions of dollars? Who are these people? I guess my *real* question is, who's impulse-buying million-dollar ticket items?

      --


      ---
      Two rights don't make a wrong, but three rights make a left. -Me
    2. Re:Credit Card Numbers by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Some American Express cards have no credit limit, purchases are approved based on your credit history. Ellison carries their centurian card, and I would guess that if he were to make a million dollar purchase, it would be approved.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:Credit Card Numbers by mph · · Score: 1

      Who says credit cards are only for impulse purchases? I've heard of people buying expensive works of art on their plastic, collecting the airline miles, and (presumably) paying off the balance.

    4. Re:Credit Card Numbers by BWJones · · Score: 2

      I can't speak to million $$ limits, but the AmEx card I carry does not really have limits per se. I have purchased cars and a house with it and have never really had a problem.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    5. Re:Credit Card Numbers by caspper69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The guy who used to run SunTrust (and donated several millions of dollars to the business school at Michigan State), Eli Broad, once spent 2.5 Million dollars on paintings at an auction. All charged to his American Express.

    6. Re:Credit Card Numbers by cetan · · Score: 1

      Those are, technically, not credit cards.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    7. Re:Credit Card Numbers by nurightshu · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I was in college, I worked for First Data corporation as a translator for international credit card transactions. One afternoon my coworker, Ahshif, waves across the cubicle at me to jack in on his line and listen to the transaction.

      This Saudi kid is putting a two million dollar transaction on his Visa card! Ahshif is translating between the merchant and the credit card's bank when the bank asks, "What's this purchase for?"

      "Well," the merchant replies, "I'm selling him seven Rolls-Royces. Five are for a charity auction, one is for his father, and one is for himself."

      I'll never understand the rich, I guess.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    8. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically speaking, SOME AmEx cards are credit cards.

      For instance: I carry both the Corporate Card which is not a "credit" card as you must pay the full balance each month (no credit is involved) and the Blue for Business, which requires simply a minimum payment.

      On a side note, i've heard AmEx's traditional line of cards refered to as "Debit" cards, but i'm not sure this is accurate either.

      Just my $0.02. Please put it on my plastic. ;-)

    9. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why muslims don't deserve to participate in financial transactions. They waste their money on shit.

    10. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why muslims don't deserve to participate in financial transactions. They waste their money on shit.

      Don't worry my friend, their time will come. Eventually oil as a fuel will be obsolete when we move to alternative fuels. Once the dependence on oil is gone these Arab nations will go back to having nothing. They live in the middle of the fucking desert for christ's sake! If there wasn't oil under their countries they would still be riding camels and wiping their asses with their hands... hell, actually most of them still are. Only the ultra-rich noble class are making any money off the oil. Ironic huh? :-) Anyway, when the oil is gone they will continue to spend like horny teenagers buying porn until all their money is gone as well. Then and only then will Americans and Europeans laugh at their foolishness! They give the money to *US* in exchange for our awesome goods like cars and electronics and we prosper! BAHAHAHAA!

    11. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Captoo · · Score: 1

      I used to for for American Express. There are a few people out there who use charge tens of millions of $US per month on their green cards. As long as they have a history of paying the balance each month, American Express will let them keep doing it. They may not have a fixed limit, but if I tried to charge $10,000,000, it would probably be denied because I don't have a history of large purchases.

    12. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Captoo · · Score: 1

      I meant to say, "I used to work for American Express." Sorry about the typo.

    13. Re:Credit Card Numbers by G-funk · · Score: 2

      Can individuals actually *get* a credit limit in the millions of dollars?

      Technically, no. You get an unlimited card before you get one limited that high. The highest limited card is probably about a hundred grand...

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    14. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I used your card to buy a 40' sailboat.

      I bet you had a hard time explaining that to the wife, eh?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    15. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the data bytes where they hold my bank account balance is worth some $$$$ if only they would let me hex edit those few bytes.

    16. Re:Credit Card Numbers by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Technically speaking, SOME AmEx cards are credit cards.

      Technically, any card that you use to pay for something that doesn't come directly out of your account (i.e. debit) are credit cards. Even AMEX.

      Even though AMEX "forces" you to pay in full each month, they've extended credit on your behalf from the time you made the purchase until the time your payment is due.

    17. Re:Credit Card Numbers by moankey · · Score: 1

      Im guessing oil rich sheiks, some old money americans, royalty left in europe, and some newly discovered filthy rich people in red china (which is confusing for a communist country but oh well).

    18. Re:Credit Card Numbers by zeno_2 · · Score: 2

      I saw a show on TV about these credit cards. The only company that would admit that they have credit cards "with essentially no limit". Just as long as they were able to pay the monthly statement, they could really buy anything they wanted with this card.

      They also gave another example of what you get when yer rich and you get this special visa. One cardholder wanted to get a ticket to some sort of show that was pretty much sold out when the tickets went on sale, I think it was some sort of political dinner or something like that, but visa was able to get him in there like he was invited in the first place.

      But yes.. the people from visa did say that you really don't have a limit to those cards..

    19. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between new money and old money is those 2 Rolls they bought for themselves.

    20. Re:Credit Card Numbers by harks · · Score: 0

      You can get a check card that deducts money from your account. The limit would be the account balance, which could be billions for some.

    21. Re:Credit Card Numbers by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Regular Amex is a charge card. You must pay the balance in full each month. There is no interest, but you pay a fat annual fee for the privelage. With a credit card, you pay over time, plus interest. With a debit card, money is taken out of an existing account, such as checking.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    22. Re:Credit Card Numbers by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      An AMEX is not a credit card, but rather a "travel and entertainment" card. You can not carry a balance, all accounts are due in 30 days.

      I heard an anecdote once about a gentleman who had an AMEX "Black Pearl" card. Supposedly it was good for a million dollars, anywhere, anytime. The guy stopped using it because clerks always thought it was a fake, and it was easier for him to work with his own banker if he needed a million on short notice.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    23. Re:Credit Card Numbers by amoups · · Score: 1

      Generally, debit cards have a daily limit, usually around $1000.

      --
      Society doesn't turn on a dime, but if enough people lean on the steering wheel long enough, it can negotiate a curve.
    24. Re:Credit Card Numbers by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      also your purchases are insured for a short period of time if you buy using certain cards (Barclaycard in the uk has this service iirc)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    25. Re:Credit Card Numbers by fabjep · · Score: 1

      This is why anonymous cowards don't deserve to participate in informative transactions. They waste their words on shit.

      --
      - learn mathematics - shoot dope -
    26. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Ten years ago during Gulf War I (just wait a few months, folks) Kuwait was already earning other money from foreign investments than from oil. They've invested...wisely. How about the other states?

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    27. Re:Credit Card Numbers by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Methinks someone with billions of playing around money would swat aside any worker who tried to implement that like the fly deserving death that he is.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  3. Data by hayek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with your comment is in the assumption that the only thing being sold is a username and password. Obviously the buyer thought they were buying something a little more substantive.

    1. Re:Data by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not exactly.... The buyer is generally interested in purchasing an EQ account for more than just the username/password, they usually want what that username/password grant access to. They're interested in the high-level character, or phat lewts, or whatever else may come along with the username/password. However, the key to those other items is the username/password. The only thing that is transmitted, transferred, or sold to another person is the username/password, which they then use to access the rest of the goodies. The same is true of a bank account number, or credit card number - those things in and of themselves are completely valueless, simply alphanumeric strings - but what they represent and grant access to makes them valuable.

      yrs,
      Ephemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Data by dan+the+person · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, so when i spend 200K on a house all i am buying is a bit of paper and a key.

    3. Re:Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more or less.......

    4. Re:Data by grantls · · Score: 1
      those things in and of themselves are completely valueless, simply alphanumeric strings

      It should be noted that this can be also said of human language (or any other code). The characters and sounds that make up language are not important - it's the utility of those representations that is important. Just as an unskilled gamer attributes meaning to 'valueless' strings of characters by buyinh a username and password because they bring him or her what he or she wants, we attribute meaning to a system of representation (language) that allows us to communicate.

    5. Re:Data by beerman2k · · Score: 1

      Actually just the paper. If I somehow managed to produce a deed for your house, I could contest ownership of it in court.

    6. Re:Data by DennyK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, that's pretty much true. All you get for your money is a piece of paper that says the Folks In Charge won't object to your occupancy of a particular plot of land and any structures on it. Of course, you attach a particular value to your ability to live somewhere without behing harassed or removed by force, but what it really boils down to is you giving the guy who currently has that piece of paper some money, and transferring that agreement to yourself.

      DennyK

    7. Re:Data by colmore · · Score: 2

      well you also own the bricks, which i guess you could sell

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    8. Re:Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, they're transferring a software license.

    9. Re:Data by MSBob · · Score: 2
      That's wrong but it's a common misconception. When you are getting a mortgage on your house the house becomes yours at the time of closing. The bank doesn't own the property. They can only get a reposession order if you don't keep up with your mortgage repayments or other terms and conditions of your mortgage contract. Technically speaking the house becomes yours and yours alone at the day of closing and the bank cannot remove you because they found someone willing to pay more, for example.

      It's a common error though when people think "it's not mine until I've paid it off". That's not true. It became yours when you purchased it. The debt you owe to the bank is a separate contract from the purchase contract itself.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    10. Re:Data by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 2

      ie it's a secured loan.

      - The house belongs to you.
      - The loan the bank gave you is secured by the house.

      So if you default on the loan, the bank can sell your house to recover the money owed.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    11. Re:Data by iamplasma · · Score: 2

      Actually, I don't believe so. Whoever is the registered owner at the Land Titles Office of a piece of land has an indefeasible (sp?) claim over the land. So it doesn't matter how many deeds you can get out, whoever is written on the title is the legal owner. I'm quite positive that's the position in Australia, and I presume in the USA as well.

    12. Re:Data by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are something on the order of 10k key variations, so you've got at least 14 bits for that, plus...

      ...plus a stack of signed paper well over an inch and a half thick, which would easily exceed one floppy disk of storage space, let's say 1.4meg.

      $200,000/1,440,000b = about 14 cents per byte

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    13. Re:Data by scd · · Score: 1

      Funny, kind of sounds like money in general. Exchange some paper or metal, which is nearly value-less in and of itself, for something else. What makes it work is the value behind the money (like the value behind the username/password)

    14. Re:Data by bluGill · · Score: 2

      True, the land belongs to the goverment, and you still have to pay rent on it. Don't belive me, then don't pay your property taxes and see how long you have that paper and key.

    15. Re:Data by kubrick · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Folks In Charge, in this case, are the government. If they want it, they'll take it. A principle known as 'eminent domain'.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  4. Least valuable by phunhippy · · Score: 1

    WEll Hell on the other end of the scale...

    I can't even give away the naked group photo of the slashdot editors...

    I think it costs me money instead of being valuable.. each time I: mv slasheditorsnaked.jpg to a different folder, i can never copy anything there again...

    1. Re:Least valuable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't even give away the naked group photo of the slashdot editors...

      Fool! You are sitting on gold there! Just threaten to email it to someone and you'll have more money than you can count!!

    2. Re:Least valuable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the weirdest unsuccessful attempt at humor I've seen in a while.

    3. Re:Least valuable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, Your humor, and your photos all suck.

      Please refrain from breathing and further polluting the gene pool with stupidity.

    4. Re:Least valuable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you tried to bribe, you'd probably get VA Linux shares, which are slightly worse than receiving chicken pox... Plus, when you get 'pox, you're immune (usually) for the rest of your life... but when you get that VA shit, you're immune to nothing, except profit.

      Lookout what you ask for...

  5. $1G/B by Erotomek · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had to pay $4G for changing only 4 bytes of my bank account state, that's $1G/B!

    --

    Krótko: kady Erotomek
    W pimiennictwie ma swój domek.

    1. Re:$1G/B by baudbarf · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, how did it cost you $4,000 to update your bank's address record?

      --
      You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
    2. Re:$1G/B by caspper69 · · Score: 1

      He didn't say address record, he said "state."

      I'm guessing that $4G's was in attorney's fees, court costs and fines. :)

      Of course I could be ENTIRELY off base, but it seems entirely ridiculous to spend $4,000 to simply make a change of address, unless he was moving country to country and they somehow taxed the funds he brought with him.

    3. Re:$1G/B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think he meant he changed the 'balance' of the account. Deposit 4G, change 4 bytes (4-0-0-0) net cost is $1,000 per byte. He could have accomplished this much cheaper if he deposited 11 dollars and 11 cents.

    4. Re:$1G/B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not state as in address, state as in state machine.

      I'm assuming he deposited $4,000 in his bank account. That would change the balance, which is, assumedly, a 32bit float or fixed point value.

      Of course, he also created some transaction records there, so that would dilute the value of his bytes.

    5. Re:$1G/B by Erotomek · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming he deposited $4,000 in his bank account. That would change the balance, which is, assumedly, a 32bit float or fixed point value.

      No, I deposited $4G (four gigabucks, $4,000,000,000) which changed four bytes from 0x0000000c to 0xEE6B280c — well, that actually changed only 3 bytes, so it was even more bucks/byte.

      Of course, he also created some transaction records there, so that would dilute the value of his bytes.

      Yes, but those four bytes are the most valuable ones for me...

      --

      Krótko: kady Erotomek
      W pimiennictwie ma swój domek.

    6. Re:$1G/B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10.00 is much cheaper instead of $11.11

  6. Shareware registration keys by Captoo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Shareware registration keys can be pretty expensive, especially if you buy a 1000 license key.

    1. Re:Shareware registration keys by skelley · · Score: 1

      Forget shareware.

      What about the license key for a big WebLogic install ? Now that the some serious 6 figure money for a few lousy digits !

    2. Re:Shareware registration keys by Captoo · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to compete. I'll let you buy a shareware key good for 6,000,000,000 licenses. I'm just not sure why you would want to license one of my programs for every inhabitant of the planet. :)

    3. Re:Shareware registration keys by Captoo · · Score: 1

      But hey, if you want to buy that many licenses, I'll even through in the source code for free. :-)

    4. Re:Shareware registration keys by Captoo · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I can't type today. I should say, "I'll throw in the source code . . . "

      I'm going to go home and quit wasting bandwidth now. Otherwise someone out there is going to revoke my typing license.

      I don't know how many bytes are in a typing license, but if you compare that to my lifetime potential earnings . . .

      [Sorry, too much sugar today.]

    5. Re:Shareware registration keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry chief, but weblogic ain't worth shit. It will single-handedly kill java once and for all.

    6. Re:Shareware registration keys by skelley · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Don't get me wrong, I hate WebLogic. But engineers seem to like it. Oh well.

  7. Stupid Question by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You're not paying for the login, you're also paying for the character files which are how big? The login could be changed and you would get the same results, but if you change the character files around you will most definately not get the same results.

    Continue with the inevitable "I paid big bucks for some antiquted OS/Software back in the day!"

  8. Business.com domain name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Subject says it all really. What was it in the end, $5 million, $10 million?

    1. Re:Business.com domain name by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Subject says it all really. What was it in the end, $5 million, $10 million?"

      I read that it was US$20M.

      20M/12 = $1.67M/byte.

      But then again with this you are buying a highly marketable name as well that is worth big $$.

    2. Re:Business.com domain name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, you were right the first time. the name is nothing but meaningless bytes. that's all. once everyone switches to an open DNS system, all will be lost with these people spending insane amounts on "domain names".

    3. Re:Business.com domain name by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Esso paid something like 100k for a company to come up with the name Exxon. They made sure it didn't spell a swear word or something stupid in any language on earth. Or maybe 10k, or 10 million, don't know, can't find easy reference outside of my old Guiness book of world records back home.

      Anyhoo, that's (price)/5 bytes of value, probably still the world record holder, especially corrected for inflation.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    4. Re:Business.com domain name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Lucent has to pay the goatsex guy royalties for their logo....

  9. The most value has got to be in passwords... by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine the price for byte of an eight-character password that lets you change your grades, retroactively, to all 'A's. Satellite pictures and Human genome are lots of bytes.

    1. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Or better yet the root password to stock exchange machines... or to Social Security machines (to steal identities)... or to Telco machines (to intercept the above, plus credit card #'s)... or to CVS repositories...

    2. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a similar password which lets me change a few of my 'A's to 'B's, in exchange for getting laid more often?

    3. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats cool and all, but what about *legal* information?

    4. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Telastyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      The winning lottery #.

    5. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Theft of propriatary company information. I don't know if this is legal or not though...

    6. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by rherbert · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's like saying that the key to Bill Gate's $250 million home is worth a lot of money per ounce.

      Or even, say, the four-digit security code to his house.

    7. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by jkujawa · · Score: 2

      I should hope that stock exchange machines are running something more secure than *nix, with compartmentalized security, such that one password can't get at the entire machine.

      But I'm probably being too optimistic.

    8. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by 56ker · · Score: 1, Troll

      " lets you change your grades, retroactively, to all 'A's" - some of us don't have to do this as they're all As already (and A*s in some cases - as if A wasn't good enough anymore or something)!

    9. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by colmore · · Score: 2

      yep

      B-O-O-Z-E

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    10. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by FlowerPotAdmin · · Score: 1
      Theft of propriatary company information.

      Legal? Nah. Moral? Good chance. :-)

      --
      -Justin
      That's enough posting for now lads, there're trolls afoot.
    11. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Judg3 · · Score: 2

      My Ex-Company is a stock market, and we run on all Windows 2000. Root passwords? Hell, when Code Red hit we were up 36 hours straight fixing the over 2000 servers all running windows.

      So all it takes is a script kiddie with some time on his hands, in a lot of the cases heh

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    12. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give that man a +1, Funny!

    13. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex-Company, eh? I guess you were fired for not having a patch installed on your servers that was available for *months* before Code Red hit?

    14. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by ianweeks · · Score: 1

      What about Bill Gates' credit card number (and expiration date)?

    15. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The winning lottery #.

      Or at least the losing lottery #s...

    16. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by skotte · · Score: 2

      legal? well, if you're the social securities commissioner, or the stck market commissioner, of course it's legal fFor you to access your own machines.
      Duh.

      anyway, i think we have a winner with this one. i'm not sure which is better, social security, or stock markets. both have massive potential of exploitive value.

      maybe the winner would be the (probably mythical) console which launches Big Missiles, doing untold billions of damage. like the launch sequence in War Games.

    17. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by skotte · · Score: 2

      mmm, yes .. brilliant. quite right.

      but then again, maybe not. the argument earlier in this thread is about what a password really is, and what the value of it is. are you talking about the 8 digit password alone? or are you talking about the password, and the huge mainframe system which it allows you to login to?

      the password is certainly valuable, but in more of a security kind of way than a fFinancial kind of way. like, billions of dollars weren't spent writing a password. billions of dollars were spent making the software, which makes the password useful.

      just a bit of a philosophical question, i guess.

    18. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, how about a password for mothersandadultdaughtersengaginginconsentualsexime anrealonesnotfakedpicsofintergenerationalfemalesim eanarealmomanddaughterhotforeachother.com?

    19. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Still not good enuf if he's stupid enough to accidentally mention he paid $2k for an EverQuest account with a really cool level 60 wizard whose got his epic weapon and a pet familiar and a focus device and two glowing red hands and boy he kicks ass!!!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    20. Re:The most value has got to be in passwords... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Cost of key blank: $1.00

      Having Vinnie the Pick grind a copy: $3.00

      Price house infiltrated: $200,000,000.00

      Having friends see you led away in chains on a minor story on CNN: priceless

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  10. Dont know whether I would put a price to it by cOdEgUru · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I bet I would kill to get my hands on a real official version of a playable DOOM III demo.

    Karmack ?! Why are you wasting your time reading my post ???!!!

    1. Re:Dont know whether I would put a price to it by Boojum137 · · Score: 1

      According to a T-Shirt I saw once (and heaven knows T-Shirts are always right!), the human body is worth 6 million for organs, and 25 bucks for everything else that's not transplantable. Of course a DIII demo better be be at least 100 meg, so thats like 6 cents a byte (per person you kill, of course. How bad do you want the demo :)

  11. Selling accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Karma: 50, two of them. Bids, anyone?

    1. Re:Selling accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woohoo! Sold! Get ready for +1 Bonus goatse.cx and frost pist!!!

    2. Re:Selling accounts by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0

      My karma ran over your dogma.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  12. Umm... by mdemeny · · Score: 2
    Okay, technically speaking it's just the username and password, but in actuality the player data might take up a few K on the EQ server, right? So if we're doing a byte-to-byte comparison this should be taken into account... otherwise I figure the most expensive data would be for illegal betting/stock tips - where you may pay hundreds of dollars for a 3-letter ticker code, right?

    So are we talking about data, or short-form representations of it?

    1. Re:Umm... by Mittermeyer · · Score: 2

      To me the value of the password is predicated on the value of what I am gaining access to, and all the bytes therein. So really you would have to include the per-byte cost of the entire EverQuest environment and all players, without which the kickass character being auctioned off has no value.

      So the per-byte cost is probably not very good in this case.

      The real per-byte value would probably be some online email/data to get at a meatworld commodity- insider stock information or location of drug stashes would be good examples.

      --
      ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
    2. Re:Umm... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't legally sell the data there since it's owned by EQ.

      In fact, people trying to get around the EQ license are not even selling the ID/PW info, they're selling the time they spent developing the character as a service.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  13. Slashdot accounts by seizer · · Score: 2

    I am willing to sell this fine, low UID slashdot account for only $10000 (or about $500 per byte stored on the server). If that isn't a bargain, I don't know what is :-)

    1. Re:Slashdot accounts by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I'll sell this low UID for $5000 US.

      Come on, Daddy wants a new G4 Tower and an iBook!

    2. Re:Slashdot accounts by joshuac · · Score: 1

      ---snip
      I am willing to sell this fine, low UID slashdot account for only $10000 (or about $500 per byte stored on the server). If that isn't a bargain, I don't know what is :-)
      ---snip

      20 bytes to store an integer? Someone want to look at the source for slash and say if this is so? :)

    3. Re:Slashdot accounts by unicron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I once wondered who has the lowest UID's on here, like 1-100. I'm assuming 1-10 are the original moderators, but who was the first TRUE, public, just-wandered-in, registered user?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    4. Re:Slashdot accounts by joshuac · · Score: 1

      looks like Dendrite, user #3, but maybe he is/was an editor. Anyway, all the low UID users are listed there.

      I wonder if they will be getting swamped with emails (if their email accounts are still valid) with offers of cash now?

      http://ask.slashdot.org/search.pl?query=&op=user s& author=&tid=&section=askslashdot&sort=1

    5. Re:Slashdot accounts by iamplasma · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about 50 cents and some gum?

    6. Re:Slashdot accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beware: user # 47 is a known troll.

    7. Re:Slashdot accounts by onepoint · · Score: 1

      If I had mod on I would have given you alot of funny

      Onepoint

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    8. Re:Slashdot accounts by onepoint · · Score: 1

      I once gave a gift to a geek pal of mine a 4 digit ICQ account. I bought it for $225.

      so that was not to much ber byte

      Onepoint

      p.s. anybody got 1 lower than # 2000 so I can enjoy a good joke of him

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    9. Re:Slashdot accounts by seizer · · Score: 2

      20 bytes to store a 6 letter username, and 14 bytes for a password and perhaps some quotes and a comma delimiter... that was my reasoning :-) After all, there's no point selling the UID without letting the purchaser utilize it!

    10. Re:Slashdot accounts by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I have a fairly low UID (though there are obviously almost 10,000 people with lower UIDs), and it really is by chance: In the early days of Slashdot a co-worker pointed the site out to me, so I dropped by and created an account, and promptly forgot about it. Sometime later when I came back and used a different ID for a while, until I remembered this one and, thanks to Hotmail (I have been very thankful that I've used hotmail as a core email for a lot of services: During the same period of time my private emails have changed probably 6 times), recovered my password.

    11. Re:Slashdot accounts by deicide · · Score: 1

      Make me an offer :)

    12. Re:Slashdot accounts by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2

      I am willing to sell this fine, low UID slashdot account for only $10000 (or about $500 per byte stored on the server). If that isn't a bargain, I don't know what is :-)

      You call that a low ID? It's 7 digits! Geez.

      Even 6 digit ICQ numbers only sell for around $20 on Ebay.

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    13. Re:Slashdot accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the early days of Slashdot a co-worker pointed the site out to me, ...

      Shows what you know. In the early days of slashdot, there WERE no user accounts.

      My account is sub-300, and I'd guess the first 1000 or more were all created on the first day that slashdot had usernames...

    14. Re:Slashdot accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does CmdrTaco stand for Commander Taco, and why is he UID 1?

    15. Re:Slashdot accounts by mosch · · Score: 2

      I'll match that offer. $10000 for my slapdash account. any retards^Wtakers?

    16. Re:Slashdot accounts by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Wasn't there a rumor once about people buying/trying to buy accounts with low user id's? I could have imagined it, but I'm sure I read it somewhere...

    17. Re:Slashdot accounts by Malc · · Score: 1

      What is this obsession with low UIDs? At least 3 people replied to the same post as you with a UID lower than mine.

    18. Re:Slashdot accounts by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Um, how is 16950 a 7-digit number? Is this that 'New Math' I heard about?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    19. Re:Slashdot accounts by lubricated · · Score: 1

      Your UID isn't low at all. BTW if someone wants my UID I'd be happy to sell it, although I don't have much karma.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    20. Re:Slashdot accounts by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2

      You must've missed my following message correcting my mistake :)

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  14. Battle Estimate 93K by Mittermeyer · · Score: 2

    I posted this little nugget about an expensive DB access. Probably not tops but up there.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
    1. Re:Battle Estimate 93K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted a nugget like that not five minutes ago in the crapper. Fuck, what was I talking about? Oh yeah, I dumped it here.

    2. Re:Battle Estimate 93K by Animats · · Score: 2
      $93K for DuPuy's Tactical Numerical Deterministic Model? Now that's impressive. But it's really more of a consulting contract deal than a piece of software.

      DuPuy's model is no secret. It's basically quite simple, and looks like something from a role-playing game. Each weapon and asset has a numerical value (a sword has a value of 1.0), for example. It's deterministic; you get the same prediction every time. It did well predicting the outcome of the Gulf War. It's not too helpful for unconventional warfare.

  15. The Meaning Of It All by lewiz · · Score: 1

    If you could sell ``42'' I reckon you would get a hell of a lot for it - and that's, what, a byte? :)

    1. Re:The Meaning Of It All by tftp · · Score: 2
      If you could sell ``42'' I reckon you would get a hell of a lot for it - and that's, what, a byte? :)

      Actually, it is 0 bits, if the answer (42) is correct, and the question is known. This is because any other "Deep Thought" box can provide this answer without access to the number 42 before or during computations. That's basic theory of information. Also, the answer "is it day or night" at a random time carries 1 bit of information; the same answer only during the day carries 0 bits.

    2. Re:The Meaning Of It All by sfe_software · · Score: 2

      Actually, it is 0 bits...

      This information is invaluable. More specifically, this equates to [FPE Exception: Divide by Zero] in USD per byte!

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    3. Re:The Meaning Of It All by spectatorion · · Score: 1

      well, actually, it is only zero bits if you know that the answer is "42" or "not 42" and you know that the answer is correct. this is kind of obvious because you can just define zero to be the case where 42 is correct. if you have a general question whose answer can be any n-dimensional string of unicode characters, you will have 16 bits x n of information, i believe (certainly you will have more than two). even if you want to index the numbers up to 42 (say up to 64 because that's the next binary number) you will need 6 bits of information since 64 is 2^6. you get the idea...

    4. Re:The Meaning Of It All by tftp · · Score: 2
      it is only zero bits if you know that the answer is "42" or "not 42" and you know that the answer is correct

      That's why I specifically mentioned that ;-) Global truths are always like that.

      if you have a general question whose answer can be any n-dimensional string of unicode characters, you will have 16 bits x n of information, i believe

      No, it is not so simple. The quantity of information depends on the probability of certain symbols in certain places. For example:

      Q: I want to send either "King Lear" or "Hamlet" from Mars to Earth. How much information would that be?

      A: That would be one bit, even though each book has hundreds of thousands of characters. This is because one bit is all you need to fully recover the message at the receiving end.

      Theory of information is an interesting subject, a required course for any RF/EE engineer. That's where your Reed-Solomon codes come from, for your magic .PAR files ;-)

    5. Re:The Meaning Of It All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. What is a good source for Theory of Information?

    6. Re:The Meaning Of It All by tftp · · Score: 2
      What is a good source for Theory of Information?

      Start here, this is an introduction.

      Then, beyond any doubt, you should read Shannon's original paper, published in 1948. There is some math involved (the course is normally taken on 4th year in a University), but don't worry.

      Snannon's 1948 paper, and Kotelnikov's math (from 1933) laid the foundation of the information theory as we know it.

    7. Re:The Meaning Of It All by jishcat · · Score: 0
      That would be one bit, even though each book has hundreds of thousands of characters. This is because one bit is all you need to fully recover the message at the receiving end.

      Assuming that you have at least a copy of the particular book that you wish to send already on Mars with you, which means it would have had to been transferred already, probably through printed paper. You don't even have the title, unless you've already transmitted that information as well, perhaps in the astronaut's brain. So, it's still more than 1 bit, as I see it.

    8. Re:The Meaning Of It All by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, that bit is only good enough to tell them to pick up their copy of King Lear or Hamlet. If they don't have it on hand locally, it does them no good, and you'll still need to transmit the whole thing.

      In this sense, of course, you could "compress" every major movie ever made into two bytes or so. Downloading that won't help you pirate the actual movie, sadly.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  16. refine question by skelley · · Score: 1

    Are you asking about something actually for sale (like the Everquest account) or the presumed value of something not really "for sale" (like the Human Genome information or my CC number) ?

  17. Slightly misleading calculation by gwernol · · Score: 2

    Considering that what is actually for sale is just an username and password, which generally comes up to less than 20 bytes in total, this amounts to over $50 per byte

    Of course that's not what is for sale. What is sold is the information stored on the EQ servers that defines the character. The username/password are just what let you get at the character data. When I bought my house the transaction resulted in a key, but I can assure you that's not what I paid more than half a million dollars for...

    This doesn't negate the basic point though. I don't know how much space an EQ character takes up, but it will still probably result in a fairly impressive dollar/byte sum.

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
    1. Re:Slightly misleading calculation by gwydi0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I bought my house the transaction resulted in a key, but I can assure you that's not what I paid more than half a million dollars for...

      You paid $500,000+ for an Everquest House?!? Damn - I hope you got one that's at least over 1MB and has "pets" in the basement :P

      Gwyd

    2. Re:Slightly misleading calculation by LatJoor · · Score: 2

      This is ridiculous. You're not paying for data at all. You are are paying for the RIGHTS to use this character. It's just like paying a monthly fee for an ISP or cable TV, you're paying for a service, not the information itself, that's why you don't pay proportionally to what you consume. In the case of EverQuest, you pay for the service someone has provided by raising a character to a high level, then handing it off to you.

    3. Re:Slightly misleading calculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's just what you're intending to get out of it, not what you're buying.

      Think about it, the guy selling you his account actually has no right to 'sell' you his character, because he never 'owned' it. Sony owns it, it's on their server, they can modify or delete it at will. You're paying for the ability to access and use this account. Aka, the login details.

    4. Re:Slightly misleading calculation by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      No doubt he parks a dozen skeleton pets outside it to guard it when he's "asleep" or out on an adventure. Man, that's be so cool! They guard against orc invasions and other invasions!

      [/"cool"-fantasy-in-a-boring-fantasy-world]

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  18. Maybe... by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 3, Funny

    The name of GWBs coke dealer from the 70's [or whenever he did it]. I bet he would pay a lot of money to suppress that info.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. Like that guy is still breathing.

    2. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you know there is a war on drugs? That makes him an "enemy combatant", hence he can be held indefinitely - incommunicado.

    3. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Clinton's coke dealer from 1992 - 2000?

    4. Re:Maybe... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Or maybe his pimp, or any number of the arms or drug trafficers that he had dealings with, or maybe the moffia leaders that he had business with.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the state troopers going nudge nudge, wink wink.

    6. Re:Maybe... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Why pay for silence, when paying someone else to assure their permanent silence would be cheaper and easier?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  19. Information wants to be expensive by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 2

    Comment from Stewart Brand, the guy the "Information wants to be free" quote is attributed to: On the one hand information wants to be expensive, because it's so valuable. The right information in the right place just changes your life. On the other hand, information wants to be free, because the cost of getting it out is getting lower and lower all the time. So you have these two fighting against each other.

    1. Re:Information wants to be expensive by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      There's a sig around here that I really, really get a kick out of: Information wants to be anthropomorphized

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  20. NSA Crypto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much did the USSR/Russia/other governments pay to get ahold of our crypto material? Even assuming spies are bought for cheap, that's still a lot of $$ per bit.

    Assume $10,000 per key, of (say) 256 bits (its military crypto after all).

    That's about $39/bit

  21. And we are all still Paying! :) by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bill Gates Before Microsoft

    Family and Early Childhood
    On October 28, 1955, shortly after 9:00 p.m., William Henry Gates III was born. He was born into a family with a rich history in business, politics, and community service. His great-grandfather had been a state legislator and mayor, his grandfather was the vice president of a national bank, and his father was a prominent lawyer. [Wallace, 1992, p. 8-9] Early on in life, it was apparent that Bill Gates inherited the ambition, intelligence, and competitive spirit that had helped his progenitors rise to the top in their chosen professions. In elementary school he quickly surpassed all of his peer's abilities in nearly all subjects, especially math and science. His parents recognized his intelligence and decided to enroll him in Lakeside, a private school known for its intense academic environment. This decision had far reaching effects on Bill Gates's life. For at Lakeside, Bill Gates was first introduced to computers.


    First computing Experience
    In the Spring of 1968, the Lakeside prep school decided that it should acquaint the student body with the world of computers [Teamgates.com, 9/29/96]. Computers were still too large and costly for the school to purchase its own. Instead, the school had a fund raiser and bought computer time on a DEC PDP-10 owned by General Electric. A few thousand dollars were raised which the school figured would buy more than enough time to last into the next school year. However, Lakeside had drastically underestimated the allure this machine would have for a hand full of young students.


    Bill Gates, Paul Allen, and a few other Lakeside students (many of whom were the first programmers hired at Microsoft) immediately became inseparable from the computer. They would stay in the computer room all day and night, writing programs, reading computer literature and anything else they could to learn about computing. Soon Gates and the others started running into problems with the faculty. Their homework was being turned in late (if at all), they were skipping classes to be in the computer room and worst of all, they had used up all of the schools computer time in just a few weeks. [Wallace, 1992, p. 24]


    In the fall of 1968, Computer Center Corporation opened for business in Seattle. It was offering computing time at good rates, and one of the chief programmers working for the corporation had a child attending Lakeside. A deal was struck between Lakeside Prep School and the Computer Center Corporation that allowed the school to continue providing it's students with computer time. [Wallace, 1992, p. 27] Gates and his comrades immediately began exploring the contents of this new machine. It was not long before the young hackers started causing problems. They caused the system to crash several times and broke the computers security system. They even altered the files that recorded the amount of computer time they were using. They were caught and the Computer Center Corporation banned them from the system for several weeks.


    Bill Gates, Paul Allen and, two other hackers from Lakeside formed the Lakeside Programmers Group in late 1968. They were determined to find a way to apply their computer skills in the real world. The first opportunity to do this was a direct result of their mischievous activity with the school's computer time. The Computer Center Corporation's business was beginning to suffer due to the systems weak security and the frequency that it crashed. Impressed with Gates and the other Lakeside computer addicts' previous assaults on their computer, the Computer Center Corporation decided to hire the students to find bugs and expose weaknesses in the computer system. In return for the Lakeside Programming Group's help, the Computer Center Corporation would give them unlimited computer time [Wallace, 1992, p. 27]. The boys could not refuse. Gates is quoted as saying "It was when we got free time at C-cubed (Computer Center Corporation) that we really got into computers. I mean, then I became hardcore. It was day and night" [Wallace, 1992, p. 30]. Although the group was hired just to find bugs, they also read any computer related material that the day shift had left behind. The young hackers would even pick employees for new information. It was here that Gates and Allen really began to develop the talents that would lead to the formation of Microsoft seven years later.


    Roots of Business Career

    Computer Center Corporation began to experience financial problems late in 1969. The company finally went out of business in March of 1970. The Lakeside Programmers Group had to find a new way to get computer time. Eventually they found a few computers on the University of Washington's campus where Allen's dad worked. The Lakeside Programmers Group began searching for new chances to apply their computer skills. Their first opportunity came early the next year when Information Sciences Inc. hired them to program a payroll program. Once again the group was given free computer time and for the first time, a source of income. ISI had agreed to give them royalties whenever it made money from any of the groups programs. As a result of the business deal signed with Information Sciences Inc., the group also had to become a legal business [Wallace, 1992, p. 42-43]. Gates and Allen's next project involved starting another company entirely on their own, Traf-O-Data. They produced a small computer which was used to help measure traffic flow. From the project they grossed around $20,000. The Traf-O-Data company lasted until Gates left for college. During Bill Gates' junior year at Lakeside, the administration offered him a job computerizing the school's scheduling system. Gates asked Allen to help with the project. He agreed and the following summer, they wrote the program. In his senior year, Gates and Allen continued looking for opportunities to use their skills and make some money. It was not long until they found this opportunity. The defense contractor TRW was having trouble with a bug infested computer similar to the one at Computer Center Corporation. TRW had learned of the experience the two had working on the Computer Center Corporation's system and offered Gates and Allen jobs. However thing would be different at TRW they would not be finding the bugs they would be in charge of fixing them. "It was at TRW that Gates began to develop as a serious programer," and it was there that Allen and Gates first started talking seriously about forming their own software company [Wallace, 1992, p. 49-51].


    In the fall of 1973, Bill Gates left home for Harvard University [Teamgates.com, 9/29/96]. He had no idea what he wanted to study, so he enrolled as prelaw. Gates took the standard freshman courses with the exception of signing up for one of Harvard's toughest math courses. He did well but just as in high school, his heart was not in his studies. After locating the school's computer center, he lost himself in the world of computers once again. Gates would spend many long nights in front of the school's computer and the next days asleep in class. Paul Allen and Gates remained in close contact even with Bill away at school. They would often discuss ideas for future projects and the possibility of one day starting a business. At the end of Gates's first year at Harvard, the two decided that Allen should move closer to him so that they may be able to follow up on some of their ideas. That summer they both got jobs working for Honeywell [Wallace, 1992, p. 59]. As the summer dragged on, Allen began to push Bill harder with the idea that they should open a software company. Gates was still not sure enough to drop out of school. The following year, however, that would all change.


    The Birth of Microsoft

    In December of 1974, Allen was on his way to visit Gates when along the way he stopped to browse the current magazines. What he saw changed his and Bill Gates's lives forever. On the cover of Popular Electronics was a picture of the Altair 8080 and the headline "World's First Microcomputer Kit to Rival Commercial Models." He bought the issue and rushed over to Gates's dorm room. They both recognized this as their big opportunity. The two knew that the home computer market was about to explode and that someone would need to make software for the new machines. Within a few days, Gates had called MITS (Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems), the makers of the Altair. He told the company that he and Allen had developed a BASIC that could be used on the Altair [Teamgates.com, 9/29/96]. This was a lie. They had not even written a line of code. They had neither an Altair nor the chip that ran the computer. The MITS company did not know this and was very interested in seeing their BASIC. So, Gates and Allen began working feverishly on the BASIC they had promised. The code for the program was left mostly up to Bill Gates while Paul Allen began working on a way to simulate the Altair with the schools PDP-10. Eight weeks later, the two felt their program was ready. Allen was to fly to MITS and show off their creation. The day after Allen arrived at MITS, it was time to test their BASIC. Entering the program into the company's Altair was the first time Allen had ever touched one. If the Altair simulation he designed or any of Gates's code was faulty, the demonstration would most likely have ended in failure. This was not the case, and the program worked perfectly the first time [Wallace, 1992, p. 80]. MITS arranged a deal with Gates and Allen to buy the rights to their BASIC.[Teamgates.com, 9/29/96] Gates was convinced that the software market had been born. Within a year, Bill Gates had dropped out of Harvard and Microsoft was formed.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  22. That's too simplistic a view. by stienman · · Score: 2

    You aren't paying for bytes, you are paying for time. The time the person selling took to build their character up, for instance. The end product is represented by a series of bytes, and that is what is physically transferred from person to person, but the actual product is not the username/password.

    In every other case it's the same. The human genome represents millions of dollars in hardware, research, man hours, etc. Sure, you can fit the resulting data into a nice little package of X bytes, but you aren't paying for the bytes.

    -Adam

    You are neither well-formed, nor valid.

    1. Re:That's too simplistic a view. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. If you buy a car, are you paying for the title (sheet of paper) or are you getting the car too?

      While it may just take a couple of bytes to prove that you own it, it's not saying that all you've bought can be represented in a couple of bytes.

  23. By that logic I bought an expensive key... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Using that same logic, the key to a house costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. You aren't buying the house, but rather the key to the lock on the house. Or perhaps a better comparison is that of a car (since the locks on a house can be changed or might not exist at all). $20,000 for a little piece of metal? Wow!

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:By that logic I bought an expensive key... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I posted on the root level that license keys are probably the most expensive byte for byte, because in that case it is different, usually you have the full software installed, for free, and you just need to pay for the license key to use it. Almost all expensive software comes with a demo key before you buy it, but it ships with the full software package, so you can just unlock it once you get it integrated into your workflows.

      To extend your analogy, it's like getting the house built on your land with the option to tear it down if you don't want to pay for the keys.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:By that logic I bought an expensive key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite true... But if you wanted to modify the car that your key fits, or renovate the house to which your key works, you're allowed to.

      In the software respect, you are not buying the software, or even the licence key.. You buy the RIGHT to use that software in said manner.

      When it comes down to it, when you buy an EQ character, you are ONLY buying someones time and effort (plus the right to use the EQ stats).

      I would ramble on about the virtues of Free Software, but then again, this is Slashdot. I'll let another AC take care of it.

      ab2650.

    3. Re:By that logic I bought an expensive key... by Empty+Threats · · Score: 1

      You're not buying the keys to the house, you're buying the deed, the piece of paper that says you have certain legal rights to the property.

      I imagine that sheet of paper is much more $/oz than a key >)

  24. Title? by Out4Blood · · Score: 1

    Cost me $289,000 to change the name on the title to my house.

    --
    - Consult the dictionary frequently to avoid mispelling
  25. License Keys by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would have to be license keys. Probably involving SGI.

    A license key is a string of maybe 30 bytes usually, and cost up to the millions of dollars.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:License Keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, but you forget the dongle that comes with that key, probably a 64Kbyte beast (one hell of a cipher) which has to be changed every month should you wish to continue using the software.

  26. This is a redundant question ... by LL · · Score: 1

    Because modern financial markets work on derivatives over underlying financial assets. Thus an exerciseable option over insurance loss for a satellite would be valued at a few billion dollars, and can be implemented as a single accept/decline of exercise. Thus the apparant information size is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the contractual obligations and legal infrastructure underpinning that option.

    If you want real value, figure out the information cost of accessing the US bootball that controls the nuclear codes. You can literally reduce the world to the Stone age with effectively wiping out probably 1,000 trillion dollars of accumulated human capital and investment.

    If you want something closer to home, figure out the cost of the root password to the root servers which will be registring an increasing amount of world commerce. I believe (hearsay) ATT once figured out the business losses stemming from a 1 hour disruption of their network and it wasn't pretty.

    LL

  27. Cost to protect by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

    Maybe a better question is how much money has been spent to protect the smallest amount of information? Nuclear launch codes come to mind.

    Or to decrypt the smallest amount of information : Enigma.

    Or another question is, if someone were able to misuse some numbers, what would be the most damage they could cause? For me, I think it would be my social security number. 9 Digits. They could run up massive debt in my name. Granted, there's legal protection, but still - losing your government-issued identity is probably the worst thing that could happen to an individual, from the standpoint of protecting a small number of bits.

    The most expensive number to ever calculate was of course, 42.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  28. Wrong Comparison by stu72 · · Score: 2

    The issue illustrated by the EQ example is not that the user/pass combination is $x/y bits. As many have pointed out, the actual data you gain access to is much more than the bits in the user/pass, *however* the real issue is - what the most valuable data you've ever seen, protected by the least amount of entropy?

    My money would be on nuclear launch codes, although I have no idea how long they are, so I could be wrong, but holding life or death for billions in a string of numbers is pretty impressive.

    1. Re:Wrong Comparison by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone who has any inkling on how long the nuclear launch codes could tell us, either, so we'll have to guess. I, personally, think they're around 30-40 digits, but hey, I could be wrong.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    2. Re:Wrong Comparison by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Launch codes are only 10 digits. Didn't you ever see WarGames? TV never lies.

    3. Re:Wrong Comparison by tftp · · Score: 2
      Since targeting info is downloaded into the rocket anyway, so can be the key to decipher it. The key can be as long as you want, the only restriction is that a human would need to key it in before launch.

      The whole system (warhead - rocket - launch - target) can be easily secured with so many layers of encryption code (most of which is not even in the firmware most of the time, and maybe not even in the launch site computers!) that it would definitely make it easier for terr'ists just to smuggle the warhead into the target country rather than try to risk it all breaking through layers of encrypted stuff, which undoubtedly has lots of anti-debugging "trapdoors" that render it useless. For example, it is known that IFF boxes are usually fitted with a small explosive charge, and you can't open them without knowing exactly how.

    4. Re:Wrong Comparison by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      And, like with phone numbers in The Matrix, it's that last damned digit that is so hard to figure out, what with all the tens of thousands of possibilities they have to try.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  29. Bah by Sesse · · Score: 1

    I've been on dialup, paying by the second, and downloading 0 byte files. Easily becomes the most expensive data you can possibly imagine ;-)

    /* Steinar */

    --
    (This comment is of course GPLed.)
  30. Headlines. by blair1q · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We win" -- VE Day, 5/8/1945

    Calculate the cost of that.

    --Blair
    "Hint: don't just count $."

    1. Re:Headlines. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Which actually went out on the telegraph as the letter 'V', dit-dit-dit-dah. Morse isn't mixed-case, so it's maybe six bits (26 + 10 + punctuation + in-band signaling like "dahditditdahdit" == between 32 and 64).

      I was going to suggest the still pictures of the Trinity test but you've got me beat.

    2. Re:Headlines. by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

      How about VJ day?

      That was costly, and we are still feeling the ramifications today...

    3. Re:Headlines. by ender81b · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting question. Ok, here we go - a test of my history abilities. I am calculating from united states and soviet union only, not factoring UK/Canada/Austrila, etc, etc. Not to offend anybody or in anyway diminish there contribution but this I don't wnat this to turn into an all day project.

      United States

      10% (avg) of GDP from 1941-42
      37% of GDP from 1942-1945 (avg)
      GDP(in billions) 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945
      113.5 144.2 180.0 209.0 221.1
      Defense Spending: 11.4 53.4 66.0 77.3 81.8

      Total Defense: $289.6 Billion (note: roughly 1/3 of this went to the pacific theatre)
      Casulties: 292 000 dead (estimating cost of lives is NOT something I am going to do)

      Soviet Union

      Casulties: 13.6 million armed forces, 7.7 million civilian dead (note: roughly 1/2 of those who entered service in soviet military where either killed or wounded. Estimate the cost of that!)

      Note: No official records of cost of WWII to Soviet Union have ever been released (that I know of or could find). Estimates are on the order of $350 billion counting damage to infrastructure, etc.

      Soviet Union (350) + US (191.1) cost: $541.1 billion. unadjusted for inflation

      "We Win" = 48 bits of ASCII code. Each Bit = 11.27$ billion dollars. Rough adjustment for Australia,NZ,Britain,Canada,etc = 13.45 billion dollars/bit unadjusted for inflation

      Not taking into account casulties, thousands of other unknown/unquantifiable factors.

      Sources:
      A war to be Won - Murray and Millet
      The World At Arms - Reader's Digest (publisher
      Us Gov't GDP - IRS website

    4. Re:Headlines. by Jordan+Graf · · Score: 1

      One if by land, two if by sea.

    5. Re:Headlines. by line-bundle · · Score: 2
      "We win" -- VE Day, 5/8/1945 Calculate the cost of that. --Blair "Hint: don't just count $."

      You also need to count all the stuff which happened beforehand (and I can bet you you find trillions of bytes)

      The value of info is mostly a contextual affair, so how much of the context do you add in

    6. Re:Headlines. by Jordan+Graf · · Score: 1

      From the ride of Paul Revere. So if you consider this three possible states (0-2 lanterns) it takes 2 bits to encode.

      What was the "value" of that particular message? Up for debate of course but conventional wisdom is that the revolutionary war would have been lost without it and history would be very different.

    7. Re:Headlines. by Turbyne · · Score: 0

      Imagine what it would be with the inflation adjustment. Then again, how much would the design of a functional flux capacitor be worth?

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    8. Re:Headlines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (estimating cost of lives is NOT something I am going to do)

      You could estimate it using the equation:

      (AMA - AAA) * AYP * CN

      where: AMA is average max age of people (when they would naturally die), AAA is avarage actual age of casulties when they died, AYP is avarage yearly payout in avarage job, CN is the casulties number.

      Now, I know it sounds cynical, but you -can- count the monetary value of human casulties. I don't know the values of AMA, AAA and AYP, but I'll count the value if anyone gives me those numbers. It can be very interesting to see if the human cost was actually higher then the cost of equipment and infrastructure.

    9. Re:Headlines. by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Billion? Come on, the US starts out with 32 IPCs and, if lucky, get to earn 40-42. The USSR starts with 24, but if it gets all of Germany's territory, can be getting over 50 (OK, 45 limit) before turning on Japan.
      Billions. That would take, like, 10 million turns.

    10. Re:Headlines. by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > So if you consider this three possible states (0-2
      > lanterns) it takes 2 bits to encode.

      Wrong!

      &lt ubernerd=on>

      That system is using unary! There are only 2 pieces of information, or 3 if you count nothing = no info yet. Unary doesn't waste a "half a bit", which binary would do since you have to use two bits to encode 3 pieces of information, wasting "half a bit".

      &lt ubernerd=off>

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    11. Re:Headlines. by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Nope. There was one goal. You could even reduce it from a few bytes to one bit, since "We Lose" is the binary opposite of "We Win".

      VJ is a more complicated question because it receives savings from the repurposing of economics already in place fighting for VE day.

      If you're going to quibble with context, then just how much is the premise worth? A login name and password are a few bytes, but in context they represent several GB of data (persistent and historical) and several man-years of gameplay. I think the premise implies that context is essential, but the few bytes are the good being sold, so you can't dismiss it.

      And it occurs to me then that a thousand bucks for a top-notch EQ login would be a screaming deal, compared with the cost of the work put into it. I don't see anyone making a living creating them. (I don't see anyone caring enough about a few extra hit points to pay a thousand bucks for one, but hey, the world is full of baffling products and obsessed consumers.)

      --Blair

    12. Re:Headlines. by Jordan+Graf · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's using Unary, but you want to be able to compute "cost per byte" right? So somehow we need to be able to compare the value of this message to other binary encoded messages like the password for an Everquest account. This requires your message to encoded in binary.

      However, if you want to be super picky, you can figure out the fractional requirement for how many bits are required to encode this message with this formula:

      log (Number of states) / log (Number of states per symbol)

      Which in this case works out to log 3 / log 2

      or approximately 1.58 bits. Of course if this is the only message you're sending (which it was) you'd need to round up to the next integral number which brings us back to two.

  31. On Ebay by Alomex · · Score: 2


    Natalie Portman's phone number on Ebay....
    .
    .
    .
    .
    if it ever came up for auction.

    1. Re:On Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      phone number? grow up silly. auction off her virginity and tons of pathetic fools would pay.

    2. Re:On Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be realistic, that girl is not a virgin.

      I know too many women of a similar age and appearance to know otherwise.

    3. Re:On Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Natalie Portman's phone number on Ebay....

      I'll settle for her dirty or naughty bits... ;)

    4. Re:On Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about these??

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&it em =1540606232

    5. Re:On Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't buy anything on ebay with out a picture of it :)

    6. Re:On Ebay by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Although the Yoda fight scene was interesting, they could have moved her belly button up an hour and a half to make the beginning part more interesting.

      And Darth still has a foot and a half to grow.

      And couldn't they hire someone with a brain powerful enough to enunciate words correctly and clearly, instead of a kid who sounds like he just got yanked off his first high school play project after one lesson from his drama teacher (played by Will Farrell of Saturday Night Live.)

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  32. VeriSign's private keys by Demerzel · · Score: 1

    Especially if you consider how much they pay to protect them...

  33. /. quick run down of expesnive info by bilbobuggins · · Score: 5, Funny
    Everquest Account (~20 bytes): $1500

    Business.com (~8 bytes): $5,000,000

    Natalie Portman's phone number (~9 bytes): priceless

    1. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Natalie Portman's phone number (~9 bytes): priceless

      Should that read 'Natalie Portman's Call Screener (~9 bytes): worthless'? ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could I speak to Natalie Portman please?*dialtone*

    3. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone number is at most 4.25 bytes. Game Over, now that's 8 bytes.

    4. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by tftp · · Score: 2

      It might come as a surprise to many at /., but NP is not that famous, compared to many other stars.

    5. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You bastard... you just made me spend an hour at imdb.com looking at Natalie Portman pictures.

    6. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Natalie Portman's phone number (~9 bytes): priceless

      Actually if you're smart about the encoding you can squeeze a 10 digit US phone number (123)456-7890 into 4 bytes.

      You can store any 10 digit number in 4 bytes + 2 bits with room to spare. By skipping unused area-codes and other invalid numbers you can *just* fit it in 4 bytes.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NP's phone number? You want the number of that ice queen? When your dick falls off (frostbite) don't come running to me.

      It's 867-5309.

    8. Re:/. quick run down of expesnive info by WeedMonkey · · Score: 1

      OK, hands up, who's phoned this number?

  34. Not the human genome by Otter · · Score: 2
    The total cost for Phase One ("working draft") is approximately $300 million worldwide, with roughly half ($150 million) being funded by the US National Institutes of Health.

    The Human Genome Project is sometimes reported to have a cost of $3 billion. However, this figure refers to the total projected funding over a 15-year period (1990-2005) for a wide range of scientific activities related to genomics. These include studies of human diseases, experimental organisms (such as bacteria, yeast, worms, flies, and mice); development of new technologies for biological and medical research; computational methods to analyze genomes; and ethical, legal, and social issues related to genetics. Human genome sequencing represents only a small fraction of the overall 15-year budget.

    Even if you accept the $3 billion number, that's about $1/base pair. At 4 possiblities per bp, it could be done at $0.50/byte, or comfortably at $1/byte.
    1. Re:Not the human genome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human genome is a much better deal than that. The transcription information and annotations Celera sells is about 1 TB. And it's a bit less than $3B a copy.

    2. Re:Not the human genome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you accept the $3 billion number, that's about $1/base pair. At 4 possiblities per bp, it could be done at $0.50/byte, or comfortably at $1/byte.
      At $1/base pair and 4 base pairs (8 bits) packed into one byte, it's $4/byte.

  35. Everquest sales are currency arbitrage by dbc · · Score: 1

    My cube neighbor and I once did an analysis of Everquest character auctions on E-Bay. Our conclusion was that Everquest currency (I forget what it is) pretty much traded (at that time) for a uniform 4 "whatevers" to the $US. This was amazingly constant. I wanted to start a futures pit in Everquest land, but he explained to me that it couldn't be done (I'm not an EQ'er, so pardon the technical cluelessness.)

  36. Glib reasoning by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I've heard of Everquest accounts sold for upwards of a thousand dollars... Considering that what is actually for sale is just an username and password, which generally comes up to less than 20 bytes in total, this amounts to over $50 per byte.

    Well, the money is being paid (presumably) for the stats and inventory of that user. So saying the 'value per byte' based on the metrics of the key is like saying that paying 1000$ for a key to a safety deposit box with 1000$ in it works out to (1000/metrics-of-key)$

    So the real cost-per-byte number for these EQ accounts relates to how many bytes are in a full player record for an EQ account.

    Anyhow, I'm sure some company out there has paid in the thousands for a few lines of code.

    This does make me think about my 'Guiness Book of World Records That We'll Never Know' book I wish I could have. Whats the furthest a rental cars keys have ever been from its associated car, and is there an interesting story about it? You get the idea ...

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:Glib reasoning by Andorion · · Score: 1

      What it comes down to, though, is thare you are paying thousands of dollars for ONLY the name and password. In other words, if you were able to get those two piece (20 bytes) of information another way, you wouldn't need to pay any money at all - you could just steal the account.

      Similarly, it's totally fair to say you're being charged $1000 for a KEY to a box with $1000 in it - for JUST the key. This is because if you were able to obtain a duplicate of the key without paying for it, you could just take the money from the safe.

      -Berj

    2. Re:Glib reasoning by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

      I would also say the value lies in the amount of time the user spent building up his character along with the number of items and experience acquired. Those last two are most relevant. I don't think the size of the data is relevant at all. You can buy a full cd-rom for 50 cents at the store but the content is crap, or you can buy a 1 million dollar application that can fit on a couple of floppy disks. It's not the medium or size, it's the content... unless of course the medium contains large amounts of gold. :)

    3. Re:Glib reasoning by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      But you couldn't just steal the account -- if you did, the original owner would talk to Sony and get the account shut down. Not to mention if you did that, it would be illegal (selling EQ accounts may be against Sony's AUP, but its not illegal..Hacking into an Everquest account on the other hand most certainly is).

      Fool!

    4. Re:Glib reasoning by taernim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everquest is more "high profile", but several large-scale text games have had this "buying a character" phenomenon occur.

      I play Gemstone III by Simutronics, and know of at LEAST one person whose full time job is just selling items and characters and "coins" for real life money.

      Sure, he invested a lot of his time into the game initially, but he makes enough to support himself on it, so that's gotta say something...

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    5. Re:Glib reasoning by FallLine · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yes, it says he's a complete and utter looser.

    6. Re:Glib reasoning by cookd · · Score: 1

      Correction: it says the people who buy from him are suckers. And potentially losers. And definitely need to get a life...

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    7. Re:Glib reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      posting anon b/c remembering my pw is not something i am good at in the morning...

      Take the Win95 code, (or any other Redmond codebase) estimate sales/retail value of all sold and then add up to that all the bukcs lost to downtime, patch development, MCSE feeding... divided by the number of binary/sc bytes

      That'll be a bummer.

    8. Re:Glib reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you start the book yourself? Make it a website. take stories and post whatever you want. People don't have to believe any of it. Who knows, it could take off like that crazy guy's site from Italy? or whatever.

    9. Re:Glib reasoning by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Whats the furthest a rental cars keys have ever been from its associated car, and is there an interesting story about it?

      I seem to recall that Neil Armstrong...
      um, nevermind :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:Glib reasoning by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Exactly. He gets to do what he loves to do, play games online, and get paid for it. Now, howmany here wouldn't love a job like that?

      > Yes, it says he's a complete and utter looser.

      As opposed to your cool job pumping gas.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  37. DNS Names by ag3n7 · · Score: 1

    Its got to be domain names... millions of dollars for some of them.

    A lot smaller (byte wise) than a user id and password.

  38. it must be.... by r00tarded · · Score: 2, Funny

    bill gates' ATM pin.

    1. Re:it must be.... by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, given that you can probably take out $300/day max, that amount is less than the interest on the interest on the interest on what his pocket lint is worth, so, like a mosquiteo sucking on Sally Struthers, you wouldn't make a dent.

      That's also roughly the equivalent of about $45/hour, after taxes.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    2. Re:it must be.... by r00tarded · · Score: 1

      bill gate's atm pin: $45 an hour
      screwing over bill gates: priceless

  39. RSA labs... by graveyhead · · Score: 2


    How about the RSA factoring challenge? The biggest prize is $200,000 for the 2048 bit key (256 bytes). That makes it about $781 per byte.

    --
    std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
  40. bank account numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the Sultan of Brunei, Bill Gates etc. Richest people in the world - billion(s) of $ per byte.

    1. Re:bank account numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, why has nobody modded this up?

    2. Re:bank account numbers by colmore · · Score: 2

      because it's the 50th bank account / credit card # post in this forum

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    3. Re:bank account numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but this was about billions of $ per byte instead of thousands ^^

    4. Re:bank account numbers by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Ehehehe, whoom! Right over your head, Colmore, so closely you got a buzz cut from it.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  41. enigma by debrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Give a man a fish and tomorrow and he will be hungry the day after. Teach a man to fish, and he will subsist. Certainly, algorithms then are the most valuable. Take DeCSS - how many bytes was that down to? Look at it's financial, freedom, and legal implications.

    Even more importantly - look at WWII German Enigma codes - the decoding of any one single message was certainly valuable, but understanding how to decode it was invaluable. Like life - power is knowledge, and understanding is inferring knowledge where before there was none (read: understanding creates power).

    cheers

    1. Re:enigma by browse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Build a man a fire and hell be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

    2. Re:enigma by plierhead · · Score: 1
      Understanding how to decode Enigma was certainly valuable, but not invaluable for a couple of reasons:
      1. The results could not be used freely because doing so would have made it obvious to the Germans that their messages were insecure and they would have switched to a new technology - even an Enigma with a couple more rotors which would have defeated all possible decryption. They did consider this a couple of times but were always reassured by the theoretical unbreakable nature of Enigma.
      2. What some worthy called the "friction of war" - ie even knowing what the enemy's up to doesn't mean you can kick their ass with certainty. Once the action starts things rarely go according to plan.
      --

      [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    3. Re:enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give a man a 20 dollar bill, clothe and feed him for a few days. Teach him to make a 20 dollar bill, and feed him for 15-30 years.

    4. Re:enigma by debrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You make good points. I followed "valuable" by "invaluable" perhaps more for assonance than semantics.

      Neil Stephenson makes good light of your first point in Cryptonomicon (ie. detachment 2703+1), and certainly your second is adamantly indicated by Sun Tzu's fundamentals. Who am I to disagree? ;)

      However, I would hazard that one could permit the definition of invaluable (valuable beyond estimation) for Enigma insofar as it provided options to the Allies that would not have otherwise been available. I am not qualified to answer that authoritatively, but certainly Stephenson's fictional history indicates this to be permissible, if not appropriate.

    5. Re:enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give a man a fish, he'll ask you for some lemon. Teach a man to fish and he'll leave work early on Fridays.

    6. Re:enigma by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

      Give a man a fish, and he owes you a favour.

      Teach a man to fish, and you lose your monopoly on fishing.

    7. Re:enigma by plierhead · · Score: 1

      Yep, and if "valuable beyond estimation" is the definition then I guess one would have to say that anything that saved even one human life should be considered invaluable, so Enigma would be for sure. I stand (or actually, sit with my feet on the desk) corrected !

      --

      [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    8. Re:enigma by Alsee · · Score: 2

      DeCSS - how many bytes was that down to?

      434 bytes of source code, but text is very compressible. PKZIP squeezes it down to 252 bytes encoded, but then it adds a bunch of headers and stuff. If you chose the right compression I'm sure you could get it under 200 bytes.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:enigma by PerryMason · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the allies in many cases were forced to ignore the information discovered in Enigma transmissions so as not to alert the Germans that Enigma had been cracked.

      In this light, the information was clearly valuable, but not invaluable. Many lives were lost to German uboats whilst crossing the Atlantic, even when the allies were aware of the presence of the Germans.

      --
      "I'm tired of all this 'Aren't humanity great' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
    10. Re:enigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just like in Star Trek when Worf saved Jadzia so she could live another six months instead of letting her die, thus costing many millions of lives because the spy they were sent to get was recaptured and executed before his valuable information on the war could be extracted.

      Or that time, 'member when in Star Trek: Whales, when they were giving that guy the formula for transparent aluminum and they were arguing about how the timeline would be affected and Scotty says how do you know he didn't invent it anyway?

  42. Go / No-go on a new drug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Cost: about 500M USD
    Size: 1 bit
    Value: either a billion+ in sales per year, or zero.

    Hey, it's pretty expensive even if you include a representation of the structure of the compound.

    1. Re:Go / No-go on a new drug by colmore · · Score: 3, Funny

      a senator's vote

      1/0

      depending on the issue and the senator, it's a few tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. but don't be fooled, they're all for sale.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Go / No-go on a new drug by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that one drug that saves a fraction of the people with heart disease or cancer being delayed a few years would cause more deaths than all the wars the US has been in plus all the needless deaths that drugs too early to market might cause.

      What's that worth (not including the ": priceless!" stuff.)

      I'm sure that's never happened, of course. Thirty million needless early deaths in the bush are worth one needless death in the front of cameras in the hand to a politician.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    3. Re:Go / No-go on a new drug by colmore · · Score: 2

      Cancer and heart disease are very very tough problems, it's unlikely that any single miracle drug is going to make a significant dent in the death toll.

      wheras a media frenzy over an unsafe, untested new drug could cause all kinds of harm...

      no, i'll stick to skepticism and scientific accuracy, thank you.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  43. Everquest accounts are more than just two strings. by FATRanger · · Score: 1

    As any EQ player (seller actually, many players are against it, but that's a whole other topic) will tell you they are selling their TIME. It takes many hundred hours to get a character to the point where someone will pay $K+ for it. Taking that argument if you were to pay someone to "develop" your EQ character(s) you would probably pay the same thing. As an EQ account buyer it is more than just a user name and password you are buying, you are paying so that you don't need to waste your time to play the sort of game (high-level, what not) you want. I am sure the argument applies to other forms of valuable information. You are not just paying for a piece of information, but the time it takes to develop/asscertain that information too.

  44. Paying to advance in a game? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0

    Anyone who would pay real money just for an everquest charachter is one stupid sucker. I've got a bridge to sell them. When they realize they are losers with no life and get so depressed they want to off themselves they can jump from it.

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:Paying to advance in a game? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Pay a thousand dollars for the weakest possible character in the game: a loaded level 60.

      If you want a powerful character, go create a level 1, where you can:

      -- Fight hand-to-hand vs. a monster of your own level! Even if you are a wizard with no spells!

      -- Get weapons and items off the monsters you can actually use!

      -- Be more powerful compared to the monsters than you ever will be again!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  45. "The Eagle has Landed" or credi cards? by bons · · Score: 2
    Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin's phone call was definately not cheap.


    On credit card transactions, the actual transaction is what's being purchased. The bank actually purchases the transaction from the merchant. They then sell it to Visa, Who sells it to the Issuing bank who then charges the person's account. It's odd, but that's actually how it works. And since some people buy houses (and corporations buy inventories) with a single credit card transaction, that's a lock of buck for the byte.

  46. The Human genome? - Really doubt it by pornaholic · · Score: 1

    Not unless you count EVERY bit of genetic research ever conducted that led to our ability to map the genome. As a whole, the PCR/Shotgun technique we've used minimizes cost per base, relying on some simple cloning steps, robots to clean up the clones, and some only moderately expensive, Thermo-cyclers and other tools. When you consider the number of bases in our genome (yes, we have to count the junk too), the total bases per dollar (instead of bytes per dollar, because compression makes the storage 1/4 the actual size) couldn't possibly approach cost of byte some series having to do with nuclear weapon launching/disarming/design.

  47. A one bit answer by Crayola · · Score: 1

    Two months salary to get one yes/no answer. DeBeers is the king of costly bandwidth.

    1. Re:A one bit answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree... and 2 months salary is a conservative average. Of course, that isn't anything compared to what comes after...

    2. Re:A one bit answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ultimate home theater system is a much better way of spending your 2 months salary. If purchased with a gold (or better) credit card or even extended warranty plan, it would last a lot longer too.

  48. What a silly question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this worth a post on slashdot? Bored afternoon?

    Try swiss bank accounts - I'm sure there's one sufficiently valuable to make all the other suggestions moot.

  49. Re:Information wants to be expensive..."bah" by Troll+on+ice · · Score: 0

    information wants to be free has got to be one of the least thought out mantras of slashdot,information doesn't want anything...it just is.it should be people want information to be free. it makes just about as much sense as kill your television

    --
    Karma: Bad (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)...Now i know why.
  50. X-10 by Peridriga · · Score: 2
    My cost as a web programmer
    $120
    Number of times I've seen the X-10 Ad
    approx 70,000 times
    Avg Time To Close the window
    approx 30 seconds
    Total Cost due to X-10
    seconds = 70,000 * 30
    minutes = seconds(2100000) / 60
    hours = minutes(35000) / 60
    my cost = hours(583.3) * $120/hr
    my cost = $70,000 / 3 letters

    cost per letter = $23,3333.33
    1. Re:X-10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes 30 seconds to click an X?

      I guess I didn't know there was a web programmer's union.

    2. Re:X-10 by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      How can it take you 30 seconds to close a window if you are good enough to make $120/hr?

      Oh, right, creative billing. A true contractor.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    3. Re:X-10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you still don't know how to put a comma after every three significant digits. Cost per letter = $23,3333.33???? Love how people try to brag about their salary. Doesn't matter to me how much you make. If you have nothing better to do but brag about it, you're still a l-o-s-e-r. Oh, and you'd better watch where you place your decimals, too.

    4. Re:X-10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cost per letter = $23,3333.33

      Disable window.open() = Priceless

  51. Brand Naming by alphaseven · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My guess for most bucks for the bit would be in the field of Brand Naming. Companies pay naming firms tens of thousands of dollars to come up with new words like "Lucent", "Pentium" and "Infiniti".

    This article, The Name Game cites these firms charging around $75,000 for a single word that may only be seven letters long. Not a logo, not an ad campaign, not even a domain registration, just the single word. I guess this runs roughly around $10,000 per byte.

    1. Re:Brand Naming by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
      My guess for most bucks for the bit would be in the field of Brand Naming. Companies pay naming firms tens of thousands of dollars to come up with new words like "Lucent", "Pentium" and "Infiniti".
      It is not that "easy"... Such names come attached with thousand-page long reports explaining in detail the market research behind the name.

      Some years ago, a friend of mine did a logo for a BIG company. The logo looks like a head with an ellipse going though it. It came about in a totally unrelated office, er, "event" (everyone was drunk) when someone was clowning and put an old UHF TV antenna around a bust of Lenin. Voilà, instant multi hundreds$$$$ logo.

      The hard part was then writing up all the bullshit to "explain" the newfangled logo...

    2. Re:Brand Naming by sylvester · · Score: 1

      Just how big of a company was it?

      I always thought that logo looked like it had been designed with the aid of inebriation. :-)

    3. Re:Brand Naming by DickPhallus · · Score: 2

      That's funny that those are both Canadian companies :)

      --

      --
      Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch.
    4. Re:Brand Naming by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      It is still big...

    5. Re:Brand Naming by jonelf · · Score: 1

      How did he explain Lenins presence in the logo?

      If the company wouldn't have liked it he could always had sold it to http://www.sputnik.com/

      Still in this day some newfounded companies forgets to check if the name.com is available. A rumour has it that qxl.com did it the other way and is called that just because the domain was available.

      A few years back you had to have a Ltd. to register a .se-domain. Guess what happened?

      --
      /J - to know recursion you must first know recursion
    6. Re:Brand Naming by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep. This is the answer.

      Nike
      Coke
      McDonalds

      You could burn every single physical asset of these companies. Kill all the staff. And you would still only have dented the market value of the company - these companies are brand led. (ISBN 0-00-653040-0 for lots of juice).

      It's the word 'NIKE' and the tick logo that ALL the value resides in - because people associate THOSE with the Nike values. You don't need the big marketing plan, brand bible etc... for that - all of those can be reworked. Whats of value is the existing brand loyalty and awareness.

    7. Re:Brand Naming by iiii · · Score: 1
      Absolutely right. One stat I heard is that it costs $100 Million to establish a brand. And that's just any brand. The biggest and best know brands have been spending tens of millions a year for decades to establish, reinforce, and spread their name recognition.

      So, the undisputed winner, based on name recognition, value, reputation, etc, as opposed to actual size of the name, is:

      GE

      --
      Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
    8. Re:Brand Naming by kubrick · · Score: 1

      I'm probably not the average case, but I make my purchasing decisions based on quality and price -- in terms of food and shoes, Nike and McDonalds definitely lose out there (compared to similar products in the market, Nike on price and McDonalds on quality).

      Companies that pour billions into advertising a crap product just shit me -- they're polluting my entire existence. When I look around in places and there's a Coke sign every 10 metres, that's ugly. I prefer to not support behaviour like that, in the only way possible I can. I don't buy their products.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  52. you're not buying a password. by Punto · · Score: 2
    You're not just buying the password, you are also buying the 'permission' from the guy to use it forever, and his consent to not using it anymore. The password is just the actual tool you use for security.

    It's like a server.. You can '0wn' a server by having the root password (or access as root), but you don't actually _own_ it.. The real owner can just pull the plug, and mount the hd somewhere else to change the password.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  53. "EXXON" - $1,250/bit by agravaine · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that the consultant who came up with the name 'EXXON' [sorry, I forget the name,] was considered the most highly paid author, because he got paid $50,000 for a single word. (Authors, particularly those who write for magazines, typically get paid cents per word, where foo is not a bug number.)

    So, assuming the then-standard ASCII notation, $50k/(5*8 bits) = $1,250.00/bit.

    1. Re:"EXXON" - $1,250/bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,but do you know why they changed it?
      Esso Oil had similar company policies to Exxon today and was nicknamed "A**HOLE Oil". They needed to bail out and payed someone to create EXXON. Which was within a day given the nickname "Under the sign of the double cross"

    2. Re:"EXXON" - $1,250/bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, ASCII was 7 bit (remember those days?) so this works out to ~1,428.57/bit

  54. Priceless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Policical Yard Sign: $3.00 materials + free labor TV add: $50,000 / minute Phone number of Supreme Cout Justices during Florida Appeal: Priceless

  55. the few bytes that make up the dns reccords by mr_exit · · Score: 1

    I imagine that keeping the few bytes in the dns system that make my browser point to hotmail.com or yahoo.com are very valuable to them, I wonder if they have them insured?

    --

    -------
    Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
  56. Deep Thought by joeflies · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sure must have cost a lot of money to build the ultimate computer, considered its total output resulted in a two digit number.

  57. Most expensive data ? by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

    The Melissa worm :)

    Now thinking about how a proper reference monitor could have been implemented in outlook to completely avoid this worm and all the others, and how these implementations are often just a few hundred lines of code - I vote for the "missing reference monitor" in Outlook to be the most expensive *missing* data out there ;)

    (See TCSEC for a description of the reference monitor concept, if you don't know about it)

  58. I wrote a shell for you Richard... by owlmeat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    10 input cmdline$
    20 shell cmdline$
    30 goto 10

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

  59. "I do" by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    These have been arguably one of the most expensive bits in human history.

    S

  60. how much information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the username and password is a key, or a hash value for the real information. In the context of "playing everquest on the web", it can be a short key. However, you can take any amount of information, generate a hash, and if you put it in a specific enough context, you can represent it with just one bit. Therefore, in specific enough contexts, there's no limit of the value of a single bit.

    - Shamashmuddamiq

  61. Wolfram's 3-4 Lines of Code by jamesmartinluther · · Score: 2
    I would say that Wolfram's "algorithmic key to the universe" probably will fetch the greatest buck for the bit.

    From Steven Levy's recent Wired article:

    "I've got to ask you," I say. "How long do you envision this rule of the universe to be?"
    "I'm guessing it's really very short."
    "Like how long?"
    "I don't know. In Mathematica, for example, perhaps three, four lines of code."
    "Four lines of code?"
    "That's what I'm guessing..."

    1. Re:Wolfram's 3-4 Lines of Code by kubrick · · Score: 1

      What odds someone finds a buffer overflow exploit for it? :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  62. I HATE NIGGERS AND JEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck you!!!!!!
    gaywadz

  63. No, you don't get the character file. by phriedom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The entire premise of the post is that you DONT own the character file. That is the property of the software company. All you buy is the info to access. That is why this is different than any real property, like a house.

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:No, you don't get the character file. by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      House is not a very good example. You don't own the house until it's paid off, which the vast majority of houses aren't.

    2. Re:No, you don't get the character file. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you own the house, it's not technically yours.

      The state/county/township can take it away from you for a variety of reasons: you not paying taxes on it; you not maintaining it the way the county demands (ie, you don't cut the grass often enough); or even you do everything else perfectly, but the state decides that someone else can make the land more profitable.

      This recently happened to an old lady when the state gave her home to a casino to turn it into a parking lot. She got paid for it though. All of 50% of market value.

  64. Stupid idea by aralin · · Score: 2

    Thats a pretty stupid way how to count that. At this rate the most expensive piece of information would be the numbers of Bill Gate's bank accounts or something of that sort. I think that the post was just a prime troll.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  65. $20K a year to subscribe to this site by Blue+Neon+Head · · Score: 2

    Last I heard, a one-year subscription to the L Report, a website for marketers on trends among urban youth, cost $20K a year. That's just a username and password too - and companies actually shell out for it, just so they'll know that kids in Seattle these days wear color X nail polish and enjoy bowling and taking E on weekends or whatever.

  66. Priceless? by in.johnnyd · · Score: 1

    I can't believe I just spent 15 minutes reading these posts. I'll never get that time back.

  67. Do they even teach English anymore? by Chacham · · Score: 1

    an username

    Come on!

    Whenever the "u" is long (pronounced like "you"), it is not considered to be a vowel where "a" turns into "an".

    It's "an umbrella" but "a username".

    Sheesh!

    1. Re:Do they even teach English anymore? by Rational · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess that's what happens when one has to learn English on the job. I'll go kill myself now.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
    2. Re:Do they even teach English anymore? by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess that's what happens when one has to learn English on the job.

      Well the rest of the message is fine. I would not have otherwise known.

      But, why didn't cliff change it when he posted it.?

      I'll go kill myself now.

      Have fun.

  68. Windows NT clients by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

    I would guess that Windows NT clients are the most valuable bits, as its just one machine word which goes up to number of licences the user has. This has made billions of dollars for Microsoft, so its not a once-off thing either.

  69. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my pin-code, worth minus 500.00 euros; 4 bytes!

  70. John Gotti - DEAD at 61. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When his son "Junior" got married, Gotti threw a lavish wedding with 300 guests at the Helmsley Palace. Mob bosses from the other four New York families made odd entrances, all wearing black tie with covered faces. They knew the cameras would be there, but none would turn down an invitation from John Gotti.
    For an investigator or a reporter, working John Gotti was a breeze. I could set my watch to him.

    If I got to his house in Howard Beach, Queens, by noon, I could tail him to the Bergin Hunt and Fish Club. There I would watch Gotti get out of the black Mercedes wearing a jogging suit and step into the club. Moments later, Bobby Peligrino would show up with a freshly pressed Brioni suit on a hanger for Mr. Gotti. A few minutes after that, a barber would arrive. Gotti would go into the back room, where he had his own barber chair, and take his haircut. While Gotti was getting dressed, Peligrino would take the Mercedes to the car wash.

    By 1 p.m., I would be sitting under a railroad bridge watching through binoculars as Gotti would emerge, crisp in his beautiful suit, shadowed by his bodyguards Boby Borriello and Iggy Alonga. They would all get into the car and be off into a day of appointments and meetings.

    Life Through a Lens

    At about 3 p.m. he'd arrive in Little Italy. When I spotted those familiar license plate numbers, 9766-BTV, I would get on the radio and tell my cameraman: "Main subject comin' at you."

    We would catalogue the long line of visitors. Soldiers from the Gambino family, capos who headed crews of soldiers and, of course, Gotti's closest advisers, Consiglieri Frank Loscascio and his righthand man, Sammy "the Bull" Gravano.

    From an apartment two blocks north on Lafayette Street, FBI agents gazed into the glowing blue screens of their monitors and kept a list of comings and goings. The Ravenite Social Club was then the front office of the Gambinos, a conglomerate that controlled unions, construction, garbage hauling, gambling, loansharking and the occasional murder.

    John Gotti was the CEO and didn't mind his face being associated with the enterprise. Gotti disdained the old bosses who seemed to go to so much trouble to pretend they were not what they appeared to be. John Gotti practically announced: I am a mob boss. Just like the ones from the movies.

    And for the most part, the fascination with Gotti transcended the violent realities of mob life. People tended to say, "Well, it's just mobsters killing other mobsters. As long as they didn't hurt anybody else, it was all very romantic, right?"

    When Gotti was on the front page, the paper sold out.

    In the evening, Gotti and his entourage might walk down Mulberry Street to Taormina for dinner, and then play cards into the night with Joe Butch's crew behind a gray storefront known as the Hawaiian Moonlighters Club. Other nights, it would be dinner uptown at DaNoi. Gotti would hold court at Regine's, having Jack "Jackie the Nose" D'Amico dropping $100 bills on the pianist to play "Wind Beneath My Wings" over and over.

    And you know what? None of the other customers ever complained.

    So Gotti had a routine. And his routine led to his undoing. The FBI carefully catalogued everyone who came and went from the Ravenite Club. They videotaped Gotti's walk-talks with dozens of major figures in the Gambino family. By being a creature of habit, Gotti gave the government what amounted to a family album, an organizational chart of the family.

    In Gotti's last trial, the FBI played all the videotapes showing the mobsters lining up outside the Ravenite to pay homage. Agent George Gabrielle ticked off their names and ranks like a kid flipping his baseball cards. The FBI played all the tapes of Gotti talking mob business, right down to who he ordered killed and why.

    "You know why I killed D.B. ... You know why Louie's dying?"

    After the verdict, as a small group of U.S. Marshals walked Gotti toward an old, rickety prop plane that would fly him to his permanent home in Marion, Ill., Gotti, who seemed to fear neither men nor jail, stopped, looked at the plane, and deadpanned, "You think it's too late to say I'm sorry?"

    At least he never lost his sense of humor.

    The Aftermath

    Outside the courthouse, a few hundred people from John Gotti's neighborhood demonstrated against the life sentence that was imposed. The demonstration turned into a riot. Bottles were thrown and people scuffled with police. Three cars belonging to federal agents were trashed. One was overturned by a group of young toughs who cheered and waved American flags. People called for reinforcements.

    An FBI agent who was watching all this turned to me and said, "You know who's running this, right? It's Junior."

    Lawyers for John Gotti Jr. said the demonstration was a spontaneous outpouring. They denied Junior organized it.

    So that was it. The end of the Gotti era.

  71. divide by Afghanistan by at10u8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US Department of Defense paid untold millions for zero bytes, which means there is a divide by zero error in this hypothesis. Recall that when the war on terror began the DOD bought all the time that Ikonos was over Afghanistan. This was effectively to ensure that it produced zero bytes of information.

    1. Re:divide by Afghanistan by afidel · · Score: 2

      Actually I'm sure they used the information provided by Ikonos to supplant their own satelite time. You can never have too many birds covering an area ya know?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:divide by Afghanistan by SnatMandu · · Score: 2

      but they bought exclusive rights

  72. Oil field bids by splorf · · Score: 1

    Oil field development contracts are often competitively bid. Finding out the amount of your bid ahead of time can be worth billions to your competitor, so there's tons of industrial espionage. Even finding out ahead of time whether interest rates will go up tomorrow (one bit) can be worth billions to the right entity. Overall I'd say the question is meaningless. How much would the string "terrorists will crash planes into the WTC tomorrow" have been worth on September 10?

    1. Re:Oil field bids by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      How much would the string "terrorists will crash planes into the WTC tomorrow" have been worth on September 10?

      About as much as the string: "Yeah right, do you think i was born yesterday?"

      What i want to know is how much i can get for the string: "bin laden will detonate a nuclear device in a van outside the whitehouse on sept 3rd 2002" :)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Oil field bids by topham · · Score: 2

      How much can I get for the string "The middle east is made of glass"

  73. Expensive Bytes by SamSpectre · · Score: 1

    How about M$ source code passwords.

  74. Parrallel code by mfos.org · · Score: 1

    Parrallel programming for high performance scientific applications is considered so difficult (Programming many things that occur simulateniously, in an efficient fashion) that I've heard that a single line can run ~$400 after all is said and debugged.

  75. Marketing Data by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    I have been a couple places (including my current place of employ) where the marketing dept would spend massive amounts of money on a single CD containing marketing data (customer survey results and tracking data and such). I never sat down to do the math but the cost per byte had to be up there... Actual quote from a previous place of employ: "Don't stumble and break that CD, it cost us $2.5 Million." (needless to say, I walked carefully and held onto it firmly)

  76. OR .. you are paying $$$ for someone else's time by apankrat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and skills. Then I'm sure it'll work out into reasonable hourly rate.

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  77. 1 bit for (almost) unlimited payoff.. by Axe · · Score: 1

    ..that would be a definite yes/no information on the outcome of some high stake event (a really good tip) - so you can place your bet...
    Examples would be abound (boxing matches, horse races...)

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  78. Root certs by aziraphale · · Score: 1

    The private keys that Verisign uses to certify that people on the net are who they say they are are probably the most valuable sets of raw bits out there. As everybody else has said, most other strings of bytes just grant you access to other more valuable things, representing real assets like time and money. But the private keys that go with those root certs would be worth a fair bit of money; if you had them, you could break banks, impersonate financial institutions, distribute signed malware, and render e-commerce non-viable. That's a lot of power encompassed in a few thousand bits...

  79. Expensive 1 Bits ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
    There are lots of yes/no answers that cost or have spent billions for that one bit of information. Consider the following questions for which we've spent billions of dollars and still haven't or only recently have definitively answered:
    1. Is there intelligent life out there?
    2. Is there life in our solar system?
    3. Is there a God?
    4. Is the universe expanding or shrinking?
    5. Where is/is there dark matter?
    6. Etc. Etc.
    More mundane single bit questions for personal use that are hard to really put a price on but are relatively cheap to discover:
    1. Do you have the P53 mutation?
    2. Are you HIV positive?
    3. Are you pregnant?
    4. Etc. Etc.
    1. Re:Expensive 1 Bits ... by gdulli · · Score: 1

      > 1. Is there intelligent life out there?

      Yes.

      > 2. Is there life in our solar system?

      Yes, on the third planet.

      > 3. Is there a God?

      No. What's wrong with you?

      > 4. Is the universe expanding or shrinking?

      Doesn't matter, answer will change in a few years regardless.

      > 5. Where is/is there dark matter?

      There must be some between your eyes and your eyelids, or else you'd know what the inside of your eyelids looked like.

  80. Close, but not quite by Corbin+Dallas · · Score: 1

    I've seen a number of posts saying that you're not just buying the username and password, but the characters, lewt, etc. This is close, but not quite right.

    The people buying EQ accounts could go in and get those high level characters and phat lewt on thier own without this account. They are buying a piece of your life.

    Our lives have a finite number of hours in them. How we spend those hours defines what our lives are about. The people buying game accounts do not wish to spend thier lives building a virtual character. They want to play some, sure, but they don't want to experience the struggle ( or is it joy? ) of raising a character. They want to go in, have a little fun, and then jump back out and spent thier lives on something else.

    So when you buy someone else's account, you are buying the time they took to build the character.

    This is why Verant's stance on selling accounts bothers me. I sympathise with thier concerns, but that account represents an investment of time ( of the player's life, really ) and I can not see where Verant has any legal or moral leg to stand on. They assume that they own your time, a piece of your life.

    This is as absurd as BMW owning a chunk of my life because I decide to sell my car. I invested time and money into keeping it in good shape, and if I want to move on to another car they have no hold on me. So it should be with online avatars.

    Sorry to go off on a rant, but this is my life, not Verant's. If I want to sell my time, that's my business, PERIOD.

    --
    Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
  81. raw memory prices .... by taniwha · · Score: 2

    it was only 20 odd years ago I was involved in a memory purchase for out B6700 - we paid roughly 1 million $$ for 1.5Mbytes of ram (core). And that came without any information in it .....

  82. Lawsuit e-mail (think tobacco settlement) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think the critical evidence in the Tobacco settlement is quite expensive. Otherwise, somewhere out there is a lawsuit that succeeded based on an internal email.

  83. genome ain't cheap per byte, by my reckoning by chizor · · Score: 1

    at 3 billion base pairs in the human genome, two bits per base pair (AT/TA/CG/GC), that means that without compression it takes 750 megs to store.

    anyway, the more interesting question for me pertains to information that is of general interest, not like "my password".

    --
    ... !
  84. Marv Alpert by crowej · · Score: 1

    (1 sports career + $2500 fine ) / (1 bite)

    Such a deal.

    http://www.s-t.com/daily/09-97/09-26-97/a01wn006 .h tm

  85. 1 Ariane V rocket/1bit by maxmg · · Score: 1

    The carry overflow bit that led to the Ariane V rocket being destroyed must have been the most expensive bit in human history...

    --
    I asked for a refund - and got my monkey back.
  86. How about GIMPS? by notyou2 · · Score: 0
    GIMPS, the Great Internet Marsenne Prime Search, is a distributed computing approach to finding absurdly large primes.

    In 2001, a 4 million decimal-digit number was proven to be prime. This is a single-bit result, but reaching it had taken 2 years of spare computing cycles on 205,000 computers (or something like that). That's a very expensive bit.

    http://www.mersenne.org/13466917.htm

    http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/notes/13466917/

  87. Trials, business decisions by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

    Any time you pay for a yes/no decision, all you've paid goes for a single bit. E.g. the millions spent on prosecution and defense of the over-hyped OJ Simpson trial all paid for the bit '0'. Similarly if you spend millions of dollars to business consultants to answer a question like 'should HP and Compaq merge?'

    It is debatable whether these really are paying for just one bit - the OJ trial produced lots of public information, and the yes/no business descisions undoubtedly come with heafty reports explaining how the result was arrived at.

    A test is to imagine an oracle that will (with known 100% accuracy) answer a question like 'If OJ goes to trial for murder, will he be found guilty?' If this result would be considered a sufficient substitute for actually holding the trial, then all those millions were indeed spent on one bit.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  88. Tyson/Holyfield 1997 by bjq · · Score: 1
    In terms of dollars per byte, or dollars per bite?

    I think Mike Tyson got the best deal, getting paid millions to take a bite of Evander Holyfield's ear in their 1997 fight. Holyfield may have made more $ (I don't know), but ouch!

  89. The billion dollar bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It was recently determined that large amounts of water ice are available on Mars, in shallow subsurface layers. So this answered the question: will we have the resources to live on Mars?


    It only cost about a billion dollars to get that one bit of information!

  90. Human genome project doesn't come close by sam_handelman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Let's save time and say that the human genome is a round 750 MB (it's about 3 gigabases, each base is two bits, so it's 750 MB.)

    It cost about US $300 million. The project cost of 3 bil, bandied about, is the amount we expect to spend in the period from about 1990 to 2005 (reference, search page for "billion") on projects related to Genomics, which is the study of biological sequences, not just the human genome but a wealth of other information (including information about protein structures and the like - I generated four gigs of analytical information just this afternoon.)

    Regardless, if you say that the fruit of the $300 million spent directly on the human genome is ONLY the human genome, and not all of the other data (such as correlations with other genomes which is what I was evaluating today, or the information about the number of genes, etc.) it still works out to about $US 0.40 a byte (300 bil over 750 MB). Dear, but not even in the running for most expensive data ever.

    A pricing problem - do you pay for the source code, or the binary? If you're paying for the source code, I'm sure somebody, sometime, charged a full years salary to develop a Perl program 70 or 80 ASCII characters long. It could run hundreds of dollars a byte, easy.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  91. US Nuclear Launch Codes by IvyMike · · Score: 2

    The launch codes that enable the president to launch a nuclear attack could probably be considered the most valuable "password" ever.

    1. Re:US Nuclear Launch Codes by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that only dumb people set their password the same as their name...

      Uh-oh, i think i know the US nuclear launch codes :)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:US Nuclear Launch Codes by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

      It is: cpe1704tks

      You never saw War Games, did you ? ;)

    3. Re:US Nuclear Launch Codes by Turbyne · · Score: 0

      No it's...
      1.. 2.. 3.. 4..
      Hey! It's my luggage combination!

      (Nor did you see Spaceballs, huh?)

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  92. first computers by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

    I would have to say the ENIAC and/or earlier computers had a much higher per byte cost. Thinking about how little memory they had. Hell some of the early computers only had a processor cache.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  93. Most expensive bit ever. by krypto246 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cannot remember the exact (or even approximate date) but at some point during the history of the British Empire (i believe between about 1550-1850) the King has a series of watchtowers built, streaching all the way from the atlantic ocean to London itself. The idea was to have the tower by the sea be on the lookout for the spanish Armada, and to light a signal fire in the tower to signal to the next tower, and to the next tower, and so on , until the signal reached London. The construction and staffing of these towers would literally have cost a King's forture, the equivelent of many billions or trillions of dollars today. And the entire purpose was to pass on the signal fire - a SINGLE bit of information. Not even a byte, just a bit. I believe this is the most costly piece of binary data ever transmitted.

  94. When I blackmailed Cowboy Neal... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    I recall it was worth over $1000 a word when I blackmailed Cowboy Neal.

  95. "Its a girl..." x 2 by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

    Both of my girls are wonderfull, but geez kids cost a lot (money, time, worry). Definitly not an investment to be made lightly, but the dividends can be enourmous at times. :-)

  96. Total Cost of Ownership is the issue here. by Ignorant+Cocksucker · · Score: 0
    Microsoft software is not so expensive per byte to purchase (with Windows costing around $150) but think of the cost to you of supporting it, and the cost/byte goes skyrocketing...

  97. not 20 bytes by gdulli · · Score: 1

    It's not 20 bytes you're buying, it's the rights to the character file, which is a 4k file on an NT server.

  98. How about egold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Try http://www.egold.com

    A while back, you used to be able to look at the daily gold transactions clearing, and I was rather impressed at the amounts being shoved around by a fifty cent transaction fee, or thereabouts.

    There seems to be more finality to transactions there than at a bank, so you can perhaps more-accurately say that the account amounts are guarded by the bits of the encryption.

  99. No real value by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Its just like buying a serial number to register a peice of software. The number is just a means, like a cd is just a thing that carrys data. The real value is the fact that you can use that software without the police knocking your door down for software theft. Personally, i prefer to take the risk and get a serial generator :) If its an everquest (or whatever) account, then you really are wasting your money. Everyone knows that MMORPGs are the work of satan and his minions. If you really want peoples respect, don't spend stupid ammounts of money for a username and password, steal it from them for free instead :)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  100. Microsoft Windows is the most expensive per byte by Dr.+Weird · · Score: 1

    Going by the measure that most seem to be using, money divided by the amount of actual INFORMATION stored, microsoft windows easily wins this competition.

    $100/0 = infinity.

  101. Priceless source code by SeanAhern · · Score: 2

    How about the source code to one of LLNL/LANL's nuclear weapons codes? One of those things is simply beyond price.

    1. Re:Priceless source code by LaughingOrc · · Score: 1

      > Funny, I bet you could buy a copy in Munich for a hundred grand if you knew where to look. ;)

      --

      - Shadow, the Laughing Orc

      http://bomns.sf.net/

  102. hex by Hex+Rules · · Score: 1

    I've been seing some decimal on slashdot, which geeks hate. So I've been posting this reply. So, why are you using decimal here? Do you understand number bases? I think you don't, otherwise you would use hexadecimal. Repost in hexadecimal--you may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix. Perhaps you can learn at this since it is possible you don't understand. Or perhaps you are too stupid to ever understand hexadecimal and will be stuck with decimal.

    1. Re:hex by graveyhead · · Score: 1

      Um, wtf are you talking about? Nobody talks about money in hexidecimal, and according to the late great Douglas Adams, nobody jokes in base 13. That applies to base 16 as well, 'cause I assume you are trying to be funny.

      If it's the actual challenge number you are talking about, 256 (0x100 there does that make you happy?) is the number of bytes in the binary representation of the number and has nothing at all to do with decimal digits!

      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    2. Re:hex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been seing some Jon Barrett on slashdot, which geeks hate. So I've been posting this Jon Barrett. So, why are you using Jon Barrett here? Do you understand Jon Barrett bases? I think you don't, otherwise you would use hexaJon Barrett. Repost in hexaJon Barrett--you may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix. Perhaps you can learn at Jon Barrett since it is possible you don't understand. Or perhaps you are too stupid to ever understand hexaJon Barrett and will be stuck with Jon Barrett.

    3. Re:hex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man! I just love it when someone gets it handed to them! This is just raw wolf pack in progress. I'm not even technical - (at all) I just lurk for entertainment!

    4. Re:hex by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      It's clear you're having some problems with didecaheximal yourself.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  103. Mars Polar Lander? by cpaluc · · Score: 1
    "Feet per second" = 15 bytes

    "Newtons per second" = 18 bytes

    18-15 = 3 bytes.

  104. Goats on Venus? by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's nothing compared to the cost of a single panorama from the Venera probe series. Considering the number of probes they vapourised under testing here on Earth and killed on the way down to Venus, probably in the tens of megabucks per bit, for a few thousand bits.

    They also sent back most of the first picture from the Moon after several failures and had the sender die partway through the image, using earlier, perhaps therefore costlier technology, but OTOH also had a bathtub rover (Lunakhod) up there running around for years taking holiday snaps.

    Either project covers a lot of goats, a lot of sex, or both.

    I don't know how you bitify handwriting, but the Yanks spent a bazillion dollars developing a pen that worked in vacuum at any temperature. The Russians used a pencil.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Goats on Venus? by Empty+Threats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the pencil/pen thing is bullshit. Using pencils was problematic, because the weightless graphite dust fux0red instrumentation. After the U.S. developed those ever-so-nifty pens, both sides used them.

    2. Re:Goats on Venus? by STREMF · · Score: 1

      Love that one. But do take a look at this:
      http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/spacepen.h tml

    3. Re:Goats on Venus? by wortelslaai3434 · · Score: 1

      Yip, and here's a nice link to debunk the $1000000 pen story.

    4. Re:Goats on Venus? by tigycho · · Score: 2
      While that story carried an interesting moral, that we tend to spend too much time and energy on inventing 'improvements' when a perfectly solid lowtech solution already exists, it turns out this particular story isn't true.

      Check out Snopes, the Urban Legends Reference for more on this and other urban legends.

    5. Re:Goats on Venus? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Graphite does conduct, thanks.

      To test:

      1. Get a pencil lead fill for a mechanical pencil. Split wood pencil leads work wonderfully, too.

      2. Hook each end to a DC transformer of, say, and I'm pulling this off the top of my head, one that one would use for a model train set.

      3. Turn on the juice

      4. When lead glows red, bend it into a pretzel shape.

      5. Turn off power if transformer's circuit breaker hasn't kicked in, yet.

      I note that there is eventually a chemical change in the lead such that after awhile it won't conduct electricity anymore.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  105. HHGTTG and 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next time you feel the impulse to post a remark about 42 or HHGTTG, step back and think about how relevant such a post would be to the current topic of conversation. If you still feel that such a post would be on-topic and interesting, make a phone call to a local urologist and schedule a vasectomy. Your genetic material must not be spread.

    Thank you.

    1. Re:HHGTTG and 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, for once it was relevent. The cost of computing 42, a few bits worth of data, was immense.

      He perhaps could have phrased it better, though. Eg:

      In the book The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, some super intelligent mice constructed an enormous device to discover the secret of the universe. Years of waiting, endless computation and immense costs yielded only a few bytes of information, 42.

  106. Slashdot by cybermage · · Score: 2

    "/."

    There's two really expensive bytes. Just consider all the lost productivity. Oh the humanity...

    --
    Hint for moderators: laugh or don't laugh. not a troll.

  107. Most expensive--URL? by Saoshyant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Business.com went for $8,000,000, $666,666.66 ber byte.

  108. $300,000,000,000 for almost nothing by rant-mode-on · · Score: 1, Troll

    USA: $300,000,000,000/year on 'intelligence' and still they didn't see 11/9 coming.

    1. Re:$300,000,000,000 for almost nothing by gdulli · · Score: 1

      > USA: $300,000,000,000/year on 'intelligence'
      > and still they didn't see 11/9 coming.

      Yes they did.

    2. Re:$300,000,000,000 for almost nothing by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      They saw it coming, but the $300,000,000,000 couldn't figure out what to about it :)

    3. Re:$300,000,000,000 for almost nothing by rant-mode-on · · Score: 1

      10th Sept 2001, Rumsfeld (not sure it was him, may have been somebody else) turned down the then director of the FBI's request for additional funds to fight terrorism.

      Gee, I guess they saw it coming on the morning of the 11th.

    4. Re:$300,000,000,000 for almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure they saw it coming. 300,000,000,000 to plan an attack on ourselves, make it look like a bunch of brown dudes over in the Mid-east did it, and start a war are all very expensive.

      Figure into that, mass firings and layoffs, a fake recession, a shadow government, National ID, increased power of spying on citizens, cameras everywhere, face recognition, wiretapping, Digital Rights Management, shutdown of free press (unless you're paid...), chilling effect on those who would speak out/aid terrorism, unwarranted search and seizure (just to get you used to it!) and the list goes on and on.

      Better believe that $300,000,000,000 went a long way. You're more secure than ever! Congratulations!

      Someone can still walk up to you and shove a knife in your belly.

      FUD off.

    5. Re:$300,000,000,000 for almost nothing by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

      Actually they saw it coming but were to afraid to do anything because they couldn't get a warrent and didn't want to be accused of ethnic profiling.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
  109. DMCA (unfortunately) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Considering that what is actually for sale is just an username and password, which generally comes up to less than 20 bytes in total, this amounts to over $50 per byte.

    If you consider how much the entertainment industry paid for the DMCA, it could easily be the most expensive 4 byte sequence there is. Say, for example, that $5 million was paid for it...this would come out to $1.25 million per byte, or $156250 per bit. (Note that I'm not trying to be a troll here. Depending on what angle you look at it from, there could be a certain degree of truth to what I just said, as sad as it may be.)

  110. hex by Hex+Rules · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've been seing some decimal on slashdot, which geeks hate. So I've been posting this reply. So, why are you using decimal here? Do you understand number bases? I think you don't, otherwise you would use hexadecimal. Repost in hexadecimal--you may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix. Perhaps you can learn at this since it is possible you don't understand. Or perhaps you are too stupid to ever understand hexadecimal and will be stuck with decimal.

  111. css keys by Polo · · Score: 2

    I'm sure the MPAA would put quite a large number on those keys...

    And remember, the keys themselves have value as art.

  112. I think that is pretty obvious... by or_smth · · Score: 1

    Most expensive bit by bit thing? Duh, it's "What is six times nine".

    Whole worlds have been thrown away trying to calculate that! Screw the answer, I want to know the question

  113. Vaguely serious answer by verloren · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a credit referencing agency, and one of their desktop programs was installed from 7 floppies, and cost around $400k, so about $40 per byte.

    Made me nervous when I accidentaly took an installation set home one day, though I'm not sure a mugger could have made full use of it...

  114. hex by Hex+Rules · · Score: 0, Troll

    I've been seing some decimal on slashdot, which geeks hate. So I've been posting this reply. So, why are you using decimal here? Do you understand number bases? I think you don't, otherwise you would use hexadecimal. Repost in hexadecimal--you may use "0x" as a prefix or "h" as a suffix. Perhaps you can learn at this since it is possible you don't understand. Or perhaps you are too stupid to ever understand hexadecimal and will be stuck with decimal.

  115. I'll make it cheap for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mozilla

  116. OT: Information in Money by cybermage · · Score: 2

    While on the subject of money for information here is some weird inforation in money.

    I don't believe in a conspiracy here, but that's a pretty strange coincedence. A friend refers to it as evidence of a higher power.

  117. "Yes" by jdcook · · Score: 2

    As said by Melinda Gates. That's a lot for just one bit.

    --
    Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
  118. how about.. by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 1

    the pin number to bill gates chequing account?

    or ma bitches phone numbers?

  119. There are no launch codes. by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

    This is a fiction from Hollywood. For example, the commanders of a nuclear submarine can launch their nuclear weapons whenever they want to.
    It has to be this way. Otherwise disabling the American nuclear arsenal would be as easy as killing the handful of people who have the codes, or even just blocking their communications.

    1. Re:There are no launch codes. by jcr · · Score: 2

      For example, the commanders of a nuclear submarine can launch their nuclear weapons whenever they want to.

      Well, it's not quite that simple. It takes two men turning their launch keys at the same time to fire the missle, not to mention the cooperation of the crew in bringing the boat to launch depth, etc.

      Add to that the fact that the crews know that they have a duty to prevent an unauthorized launch, using deadly force if necessary..

      It would be exceptionally difficult for any *one* man to launch a Trident missile.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:There are no launch codes. by conradp · · Score: 1

      This is a fiction from Hollywood. For example, the commanders of a nuclear submarine can launch their nuclear weapons whenever they want to. It has to be this way. Otherwise disabling the American nuclear arsenal would be as easy as killing the handful of people who have the codes, or even just blocking their communications.


      Er, no, there really are launch codes, generally requiring two-person control at the launch site plus Presidential authorization, with redundant communications methods and backups of the codes and designated alternates in case the President was killed. According to this:
      Only the president can authorize a nuclear weapons launch. His encrypted authorization will arrive at the submarine by secure radio. Sealed authenticators which are kept under continuous two-man control ensure the message's authenticity.

      The U.S. sometimes postured as if it had a launch-on-launch policy, i.e. the U.S. would launch as soon as it detected that the Russians had launched their missiles, in order to maximize deterrence. But in reality that would be exceedingly dangerous, so instead we built up a huge arsenel so that we could be sure of having plenty of weapons left to retaliate even after a Russian strike. While the actual SIOP (Single Intergrated Operation Plan) is classified so we may never know, most people think we really had a "launch on impact" policy - we wouldn't launch until we started seeing mushroom clouds over U.S. cities.
      --
      "To be absolutely certain about something, one must know everything or nothing about it." -- Olin Miller
    3. Re:There are no launch codes. by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

      All it takes is a crew that is loyal to that one person.

      A few handfulls of minions and an evil genious. (Realistically though, I doubt the person would have to be much of a genious - basic knowledge of "mass" psycohology would go a long way).

      And so what? We place trust in the hands of single persons and trust that they do their duties. In the end we're all dead anyway.

    4. Re:There are no launch codes. by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

      Notices the 's' at the end of the word "commander". Yes, indeed it takes the second in command to agree.

    5. Re:There are no launch codes. by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

      Your source is...? Mine was the second in command of a nuclear submarine.

      Think man! If there is a communication method that can be jammed, the enemy only has to jam it to completely disable the entire fleet! No way!
      What if all the command centers in the US were destroyed before anyone knew what happened? The sub commanders would just sit around because they didnt get the codes?

    6. Re:There are no launch codes. by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      What would be the difference between launching instantly (With info they don't have) and launching a year from now.

      Think yourself. The Sub missles are retaliation to any strike on the US.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    7. Re:There are no launch codes. by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      I asked my friend about this (the launch codes).

      He is now on "Inactive duty" from the navy, serving for 7 years and then blowing out his knees. During that time he "had one of the highest security clearances" in the navy.

      Asked him if he got to carry around the briefcase of codes for the president, the ones that supposedly change once a week. His response: "I couldn't tell you if I did, but they change every 3 months"

      Take that as you may.

  120. Disingenuity of description by Dirtside · · Score: 2
    What are the most expensive pieces of information that you have heard of, in dollars per byte?
    No offense to the submitter, but this is a generally hazardous way to describe these kinds of things. Someone who didn't understand the reality of the situation might actually think that the data itself is where the value lies, rather in the secure data stored on Verant's servers.

    It's interesting to think about the value that such things have. Essentially, the value lies, as I said, in the particular formation of data on Verant's servers, in San Diego (or wherever the actual machines happen to be, due to colocation). If you had actual physical access to those machines, you could simply create the data to be whatever you want -- a level 60 Barbarian Warrior with the best gear in the game, for example.

    However, physical access to the data substrate is not feasible, for a variety of reasons. Only trusted employees are allowed physical access to that areas. Brute force may give you temporary physical access, but the variety of law enforcement agencies blanketing our society would (on average) put the kibosh on that fairly quickly. As a result, the only plausible way to create the data the way you want, is to use the relatively public interface mechanisms Verant provides -- namely, the game interface itself.

    The amount of time and effort it takes, using that interface, to get the data into the form you want, is why the data has that value. A bad Verant employee with legitimate access to the data might also be able to create such value by quickly creating characters with such data, but they are unlikely to go long without getting caught.

    Yeah, this all may seem fairly obvious, but did you ever actually sit down and think it through before? I didn't think so ;)

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Disingenuity of description by mapinguari · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Saying that all you get is username/pw is like saying that when you pay thousands of dollars to a car dealership, all you're really paying for is two little pieces of metal, or when buying a house, all you really pay for is a piece of paper that says you own it.

  121. 00101010 by peacefinder · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much did Deep Thought cost to build, just to cough up 42? That was one mighty darn expensive byte...

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    1. Re:00101010 by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      How much did Deep Thought cost to build,...?

      wrong question.

  122. Microsoft Datacenter Server by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    For a 25 byte cd key.. it's about $65,000. That's about $2600 (cool :)) per byte.

  123. Yes/No on large endeavors by DJ+Uptime · · Score: 1
    • Can we go to the moon?
    • Can we win World War IV?
    • Is Windows obsolete?

    Any of these are billion dollar per bit pieces of information.

  124. Two other high $/bit by thogard · · Score: 1

    Winning lottery tickets.

    Stock symbols.

  125. Verisign's signing key by cperciva · · Score: 2

    How much would it be worth to have a few hundred bytes which would allow you to create certificates which would be trusted by almost everyone on the internet?

  126. Theoretical Cost Savings per Bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about:

    Hijack US Airplanes 9/11/02 morning

    We would have gladly paid $1 bill per bit for that info.

  127. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 funny!

  128. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  129. Intro. Economics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The value/utility lies in the process of converting those bytes (input) into output, such as a game, or a new location for a drug (in your example). Your question is equivalent to asking what is the value of various forms of carbon that are used to form diamonds. Bytes are a commodity, it's the transformations that are valuable.

  130. 42 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant


    1 byte.

    1. Re:42 by dimsm · · Score: 1

      42 rulez :)

  131. 1 bit is all you need by CarlDenny · · Score: 1

    To answer such valuable yes/no questions as:

    Does communism work (circa 1906)?
    Is it worth getting in a fight over Archduke Ferdinand (circa 1914)?
    Will the world be better if I kill Hitler (circa 1935)?
    Will the allies win (circa 1939)?
    Should we commit to Vietnam (circa 1967)?
    Should I invest in Microsoft (circa 1985)?
    Should we fight the hijackers (circa 2001)?

  132. Tiff images by russianspy · · Score: 1

    I've got a few images in that format stored on my hd. Inside each tiff image there is one byte storing the version number. That single byte holds THE ANSWER. I think it's worth a LOT.

    1. Re:Tiff images by russianspy · · Score: 1

      Lame answer to my own post. Tiff version number is 42. It is not expected to change. I hope I do not have to tell you what that number represents.

  133. Next week's lotto numbers by CarlDenny · · Score: 1

    Pick six: six bytes.
    $60 million say.

    $10 million/byte isn't to shabby.

  134. Username for sale by stere0 · · Score: 1

    My slashdot password, 8 characters, Karma 50, $30 000. Mail me if you're interested, and I only take cash and/or United Linux licenses.

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  135. +1 funny by detect · · Score: 1

    I agree very funny

    --
    // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
  136. Sun's Source Code by corby · · Score: 2

    Well, Sun swears that their operating system source code is worth exactly $80 million.

    That might not work out to be more on a per-byte basis than the Everquest account, but try amassing 80,000 Everquest accounts worth one grand apiece.

  137. $10,000 for one bit (of chalk) by Krelnik · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've heard various versions of this story over the years, but the best link I can find attributes it to a General Electric engineer named Charles Steinmetz (1865-1923):

    One day a whole roomful of General Electric's most expensive machinery went out of order. By this time Steinmetz had retired, but the company's baffled engineers called him back as a consultant. Steinmetz ambled from machine to machine, taking a measurement here, scribbling something in his noteboook there. After about an hour, he took out a large piece of chalk and marked a large 'X' on the casing of one machine. Workers pried off the casing and found the problem at once.

    When the company executives got Steinmetz's bill for $10,000, they were reluctant to pay it. "This seems a bit excessive for one chalk mark," Steinmetz was told. "Perhaps you'd better itemize your charges."

    Within a few days, they received the following itemized bill:

    Making one chalk mark $1.00

    Knowing where to make one chalk mark $9,999.00

    1. Re:$10,000 for one bit (of chalk) by XNormal · · Score: 2

      To calculate the value per bit you need to figure out the amount of information encoded by the location of that chalk mark.

      That is log2(area/resolution)

      Where area is the total surface area of the machines and resolution is the area representing the relevant accuracy of the chalk mark.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    2. Re:$10,000 for one bit (of chalk) by nolife · · Score: 2

      Similar story..
      In the early 90's, I was on a nuclear submarine and we were having problems with one of our lithium bromide air conditioning units. This was keeping us from departing for sea. The Navy was finally able to track down one of the original members of the design team that worked for Carrier in the early 60's. He came out of retirement and spent roughly 6 hours looking over our unit and previous operating logs. I believe has was paid roughly $12k for his services. The result was that the entire unit was on shaky ground but by replacing one spray nozzle the unit was up and running fine. Li Br is a strong salt so internal corrosion was a major factor.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  138. Satellite Images Not So Spensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, satellite images can cost $10,000 each, but they are big (several to many megabytes) so the cost per byte is not outrageous.

    Tent: $100.
    Camel: $230.
    Knowing where OBL is hiding: priceless.
    For all other things, there's deficit spending.

  139. Windows XP by LaughingOrc · · Score: 1

    The Windows XP Professional CD weighs in at 512,342,016 bytes. According to the Microsoft site, it retails at $299.00 US. This is an approximate cost of $0.00000058359453385138727330143464165937 per byte. Cheap, perhaps? Consider this. Divide this by the cost most people pay for Linux or other free operating systems, and you'll find that Windows is more expensive by a magnitude approaching infinity.

    --

    - Shadow, the Laughing Orc

    http://bomns.sf.net/

  140. A single bit... by LaughingOrc · · Score: 1

    Also, let's consider this. A single bit, on or off, it doesn't matter, is perhaps the most expensive piece of data, now that Microsoft has patented Ones, Zeros.

    --

    - Shadow, the Laughing Orc

    http://bomns.sf.net/

    1. Re:A single bit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, you are really stupid if you beleive that!!!

  141. I can beat these items by HalB · · Score: 1

    I have 2 items in my inventory.

    0 - nothing.
    1 - everything in existence.

    You can buy everything (inventory item #1 - information value 1 bit) for [insert astronomically high price here].

    Goods will be delivered after payment validated.

  142. or more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    including interest/insurance etc et al

  143. American Revolution by wwight · · Score: 1

    Consider the ramifications of "One if by land, two if by sea".

  144. ding! by Kenshin · · Score: 2

    That must be one really big company...

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  145. Most expensive piece of information? by clovis · · Score: 1

    It's either my first marriage license or the subsequent divorce papers.

  146. Scratch that by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

    LOL, confused the message number with the ID - my bad ;)

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  147. 42 by wildsurf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    42. The answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.

    One byte can contain it, and Douglas Adams made millions off it. (One has to wonder, of course, how much the actual question would be worth...?)

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  148. yer sig by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

    forgot pump

    --

    IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
  149. electronic money tokens by friday2k · · Score: 2

    Are obviously the most valuable ones. Especially the ones that authenticate themselves (Chipcards, Digicash, etc). Break one and put your value of choice in there.

  150. Worst Story Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    This has got to be the dumbest thing to hit slashdot in a long time. This makes case mods look like valuable news.

  151. My Soul by Phunky+Monkey · · Score: 1

    If I was to buy a copy of WinXP Pro, it would cost me ~$300 and my soul...

    I think there's a divide by zero error in there somewhere, so I win by proving that every bit of WinXP costs you everything ;-).

    --
    -------------------------
    It is the monkied monkey that monkies with another monkey's monkey. Monkey.
  152. Historically... by trims · · Score: 2

    I'd have to say the most "expensive" bits of information had to be the notes that Klaus Fuchs passed from the Manhattan Project to the Soviet Union. Estimates I've seen are that the material was no more than four dozen full pages, but that material was the key to allowing the Soviet Union to finish their Atomic bomb research years ahead of time (providing at least a 5-year jump). For an estimate of what the Manhattan Project cost, look here. For a conservative estimate, I'd say that those 50 pages (~2000 characters each = 100kB) saved some $10 Billion in research costs. And that's in 1945 dollars.

    The German, Italian, and Japanese cypher codes were similarly valuable, though not quite as expensive to obtain.

    Historically, I'd say that the $50 in trinkets that Dutch explorers paid to the Native Americans living on Manhattan Island for title to their island (ie, for the signature on the treaty giving the Dutch what became New York City) was the ultimate rip-off (or, great deal, depending on which way you look at it). Signature = ~25 bytes, with current value of the Manhattan Island real estate well north of $10 trillion.

    As a side note, the US (and presumably the other nuclear powers) does NOT maintain the "Launch Codes" at the political level. These are AUTHORIZATION codes, which tell the military that a valid order to launch exists. The military maintains the actual launch codes (at different places for different weapon systems), so theoretically, it is possible to launch a nuclear weapon without permission. For obvious reasons, the military designs launch systems so this is as difficult as possible.

    -Erik

    --
    There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
  153. Re:Credit Card Numbers and religion...wha!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucking white trash jackass. What does his spending have to do with him being (presumably) Muslim? Using your logic, Christians don't deserve to live because they only have shit coming out of their mouths...(not that I believe that) If I had millions to spend, I'd do the same thing. Get your head out of your ass.

  154. What abou the context the info is in? by line-bundle · · Score: 2

    How do you factor in the context of the info?

    For example you have a program which costs $314, but it has to run under an operating system. How much value of the operating system to factor in. Without the operating system the program would be worthless (except emacs of course :-).

  155. COME QUICK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a rare sighting of a geek cock-fight!

  156. Most valuable bit by linear+a · · Score: 1

    Whether God exists (1/0).

  157. most expensive individual bits by waferbuster · · Score: 1

    Let's look at those little bits from florida (the renowned "missing chads"), which completely altered the course of the United States government for the following 4 years. Now *that* is some seriously Most Significant Bits.

    --
    I'm an individual! Just like everyone else!
  158. most expensive byte? by numbuscus · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates' ATM PIN.

  159. "OPE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the string "OPE". It is in short supply because only one person in the world has it, its value approaches the value of everything on the entire Earth and in fact the planet itself, and it contains only about 1.763 bytes of information. So its value per byte is something like

    value of everything on earth / 1.763
    dollars per byte.

    In case you don't get it, "OPE" is the recall code for the nuclear bombers in the movie Dr. Strangelove, so it's in extreme demand. Only Col. Lionel Mandrake has it, so it's in extremely short supply. And it only has 1.763 bytes of information because log2(26^3) / 8 == 1.763.

    And remember, if disagree with me, "You can't fight in here! This is the war room!"

  160. I paid more than $20,000 for 1 bit by dutky · · Score: 2
    It cost me at least $20,000 to get the boolean value result of the function do_you_take_this_man() .

    Let's remember, not all bits are created equal. Each bit of information is, potentially, the answer to a single yes-or-no question, and some questions are far more important than others. Hence, some bits are worth far more than others.

    Let's also remember, economists (at least free-market capitalists) will tell you that a thing is worth whatever you can get someone to pay for it. This means, of course, that value and worth are nonsensical terms and you can't ask any reasonable questions about them.

    If, however, you are not a free-market capitalist, you might subscribe to the Marxist definition of value: that a thing aquires its value based on how much human effort was put into the thing. In that case, the value of access to a well used MMORPG account could be quite substantial (how much is your time worth, mine is worth quite a bit).

    Finally, we must consider that even for a single bit, the two possible values (yes or no) do not always have equal worth: I would have been willing to pay far more for the yes result of the above function than for the no result. Something very similar is true for the MMORPG accounts (base on how well the account has been used).

    1. Re:I paid more than $20,000 for 1 bit by dimsm · · Score: 1

      that made me smiling :)) i also spend a lot to one similar Yes.. :)
      but let's think a little
      human nature is making you to say that Yes, sooner or later, so do not blame that same bit, because the money are spent anyway, the only differnce is which bit is the one that spends them.
      you have had half the earth population to choose but you have chosen one of all. which is much more information (2 500 000 000 on the opposite gender) which is actually not one bit (2^32=4294967296, 31 doesn't work) but whole 32 bits, so sleep well it is 20 000$ / 32 = 625$ per bit. good deal.

  161. Federal Election results by rowlingj · · Score: 1

    The actual results of a federal election are usually one simple table.
    But getting those results! Especially when you include all the campaigns, the advertising, setting up and manning the booths, security of results, counting,.... not to mention the public service machinery behind it that has to instantly change their internal systems to match those of the new incumbents.

  162. Re:Brand Naming: GE wins! by russsell · · Score: 1

    What about the value of a brand?

    • Coca-Cola: $70 billion / 8 chars = $9 billion per character
    • Microsoft: $65 billion / 9 chars = $7 billion per character
    • IBM: $53 billion / 3 chars = $18 billion per character

    The winner? GE, with a brand value of $42 billion / 2 chars = $21 billion per character.

    That's $2.6 billion per bit!

    Brand values source: Finfacts

  163. Dollars/bit. by Saoshyant · · Score: 1

    Can anyone think of an instance in which it takes more bits to express the dollar value of data than it takes to express the data themselves? Example: Seven bits are required to express the number 127. Add another byte to express a dollar sign (in ASCII), and you're looking at 15 bits to express $127. Has anybody ever paid more than $127 for 15 or fewer bits of info?

  164. Your Most Valuable Asset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is being sold is not bits of data. The person that buys an EQ account, is buying time.

  165. MOD PARENT UP +5 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right on Brother!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP +5 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the younger among you, in the olden days you used to buy computer time (i.e. computer cycles) on a shared multiprocessing computer, accessed via (usually) dumb terminals.

  166. setuid bit by bentini · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If we believe all those estimates about how much hackers cost people...

    Just a couple set-uid bits here and there made the Internet Worm possible.

  167. Marriage: 1 bit (no) cost me $10,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It aint cheap.

  168. Anyone remember the $7.5 Million domain name? by philthechill · · Score: 1

    Back in late 1999, early 2000, Business.com for $7.5 million. $625k per byte of the name.

    Back when there was such a thing as "domain name investing", there was a "land grab" in domain names, squatters were buying them up by the thousands...

    You can still find them, in there pathetic little websites, trying to sucker $300 out of some fool who hasn't heard. The game is over, the land boom went bust, so get back in line, put your back into it boy. We need a thousand more lines of code out of you before sunrise, bonuses are cancelled, and all your friends are fired.

    How much is business.com worth now?

  169. How about registry bits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm at the whim of a program vendor who wants to charge an extra $250 to enable the dual processor support that's already in the product. If you want to enable cluster support you need to call...

  170. Not just money... by Governerd · · Score: 1

    The value of military intelligence is sometimes measured in human lives rather than purely in dollars. Occasionally people die to bring it back. Of course, almost any given soldier costs Uncle Sam about a quarter million in life insurance alone, so there is a conversion rate...

  171. I'm sure the mice would answer... by marhar · · Score: 1, Redundant

    42!

  172. "We win" - benefits are huge by HtR · · Score: 1


    We got a lot more out of it than 6 bytes of info, though. The costs were amazingly huge, but the benefits of the sacrifices made were truly unmeasurable.

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
    1. Re:"We win" - benefits are huge by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Well, no, we still ended up net losers on the deal.

      War, as I have to keep pointing out, is NOT good for the economy.

      Yes, GDP goes up, but the war-products we made in WWII:

      1) Killed human beings.
      2) Blew up, stuck in things, or sank in the ocean.
      3) Created a depression in Europe that made the Great Depression look like a royal wedding.

      Peaceful economy is always better overall than war economy, though pockets of profit attract attention from the gross disaster. America, being unscathed by destruction, appeared to have reversed the effects of the Depression. In fact we lost all we made in war materiel, plus tens of thousands of lives, and went deep into a debt that we've never paid off. It's a terrible ruse.

      --Blair

  173. Millions for 1 bit by mageben · · Score: 1

    Ask any Divorcee, I know some who paid millions for two bits:

    "Will you Marry Me?"
    "Yes" bit #1 (or in binary 1)

    "Do you want a Divorce?"
    "Yes" bit #2 (or in binary 1)

    --

    ---PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE---
    "Now, where's the damn 'any' key?"

  174. The longest computation for a 1-bit answer by CommandoB · · Score: 1

    Is (2^2^22)+1 composite or prime?

    At the time this was computed it was the longest computation ever performed for a 1-bit answer (roughly as intensive as rendering a full-length Pixar film).

    --
    Not that I post on slashdot or anything.
  175. The really funny thing about this post... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...is that if you'd included a goatse.cx link, your post would be at -1, Troll instead of +4, Funny.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  176. Max. $/Byte by Sinesurfer · · Score: 1
    Hmmm.... how about sex.com?

    the beeb report that the domain name squatter was fined USD65 million. If he pays (which hasn't happened and isn't likely) then the domain name (7 charactes so 7 bytes) works out at USD9.2 million per byte.

    --
    Regards Sinesurfer A Nerd is someone who lives for technology, A Geek is someone who lives for technology and loves it
  177. Compression by Kelerain · · Score: 1

    Well being you can compress 100% random data 100:1 then theoretically you can compress an infinite amount of information into a single bit. You have to ask yourself, how much is all the information in the universion worth to YOU? Here it is: 1

    Send your check or money order to the address included

    (Yes it's broken, follow the link and read the commentary.)

    BTW its sister volume is comming out soon, heres a sneak preview: 0

  178. Military intelligence by dsfox · · Score: 2

    Some information costs many human lives to collect.

    1. Re:Military intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've put the 'moron' in oxymoron.

  179. Intel's "i" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Intel fought for the trademark right to use the letter "i" in their products, I'm sure they spent quite a few bucks for that one letter...

  180. Verisign's Private Key. by highfreq2 · · Score: 1

    It's quite a few bits to be sure, but certainly some spendy bits.

  181. Bell.ca slashdotted! :) by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2

    LOL. I guess enough ppl followed the link that Bell.ca got slashdotted.

  182. Re:Bell.ca slashdotted! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, some admins are just stupid enough to require www in front of an address.

    Whoever thought to name things www. instead of web. should be hung with his own entrails for the endless suffering he has caused. I shudder every time someone says double-u double-u double-u dot.

  183. Buy/Sell or Yes/No. by TheLink · · Score: 2

    Yes or No can be done in one bit. Buy or Sell can be done in one bit.

    Just one logical bit can make a lot of difference.

    Also if there is some unique irreplaceable data which is priceless and it's encrypted using strong encryption, the key would be worth a lot don't you think?

    I suppose the question needs a lot more beer to make it seem fun :).

    --
  184. boolean - true or false questions by dirvish · · Score: 1

    A true or false question would potentially be worth the most as it is only one bit. So for any suggestion here you could change it to: "Is ***** true?" or "Are there *****?" For example: "Does God exist?" or "Is there extra-terrestrial intelligence?" You could get a lot of money to suppress or divulge the answers to either of those questions.

    More questions: "Did GWB do cocaine?"
    "Did Clinton inhale?"
    "Is this the best /. post ever?"

  185. on the (off) topic of EQ by kwj8fty1 · · Score: 1

    I've seen EQ stuff sell for boatloads of cold US cash on playerauctions.com. The most interesting part about EQ is the numbers - - because of the level of off-game trades & sales, it's devalued the cost of plat (EQ's monitary unit).

    Some may consider it cheating to purchase items for the game, but most of the players do. Checkout some of auctions on
    www.playerauctions.com.

  186. I got something to sell ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets bid,

    I have the highest cost/bit data anywhere.

    Who will give me $9999999^999999 dollars for it?
    .
    .
    .
    .
    (0 or 1... one bit)

  187. Exactly. by NFW · · Score: 1
    That is the only intelligent way to look at it.

    I could say that a friend and I once sold a 3.5" floppy disk for about $1535... but that would be silly. You could also say that we sold a screen saver, and that would almost be reasonable... But what we really sold was ~40 hours of development time. We did meet our client at a restaurant to hand over the disk for a check and a couple plates of pasta, but the "$1500 floppy" analysis is pretty short-sighted.

    How many hours did it take to build up the Everquest character? How much did the create pay to play Everquest during the development period? Subtract the EQ bills from the sale price, then divide by the number of hours, and you get an hourly rate for Everquest character development services. I wonder what it works out to?

    --
    Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
  188. Bits have a value more than dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're starting to hit the ZEN like quality of the value placed on anything, and why we do so. A person can look at a small ant who has just discovered a piece of candy on the sidewalk and step on the ant, or truly relish vicariously the incredible benefit that will bring to those who rely upon him. Why do we value anyting? Is it just the way society tells us to feel? Is it possible Mother Teresa had more "smiles-per-minute" than Donald Trump? While deficating into an open sewer, maybe a Calcutta orphan can experiance a greater joy at having discovered that the potential exists for an education, and a way out of that life into a new one, than any person who was more-or-less guaranteed a good life as long as they didn't go out and kill people, (given the place/culture he was born into.) Fate plays a part of it, what we consider value, and what we take for granted. Think about a painting "worth" several million dollars. It's a damn painting! paper and ink. That money could feed starving, flies in the face people and literally save lives, but that's just not the way life is, is it? I hope if I ever get rich, I still value the same things I do now. My point is, WHY are some bits valued more than others? I think bits are going to be a leveler, as they become more fluid in transactions ie. liquidity. The maxim comes to mind: a rising tide lifts all boats. Countries like the US (me) will whine about other countries getting fat from us, or losing jobs, but the world will be better off. That youth in Calcutta will become a programmer and send money to his villiage. In that equasion, the bits = dollars and probably have more value than if I exchange the bits/dollars for new Land Rover, or a swimming pool. In conclusion of the rant, I'd postulate that the most valuable bits are not those measured in dollars, but those that carry the most impact to humanity. To the original question, "What are the most expensive pieces of information that you have heard of, in dollars per byte?" It would have to be those bits/dollars invested in saving human lives, or the most good for the most people. This could be a formula total cost of IT infrstructure in Africa divided by the number of lives saved as a result of education, etc. It could be the dollars spent on the bits required to cevelop a cure for polio, small pox, etc, calculating how many people would have died had the vaccine not been invented. Just a different way of looking at it...

  189. Value of Human Life Formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use the most recent figures. Number of casualties in World Trade Center / (amount of donations received from public + amount of dollars govt. provided to victims)

  190. One bit already means yes or no by jrest · · Score: 1

    So make up a valuable question that can only be answered with yes or no. This will give you some value for your bit.

    --
    (Score:5, Not Funny)
  191. RSA Factors per-bit value? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1
    How about the up-for-grabs RSA factoring challenge? Come up with factors of a certain 2048 bit number and get $200,000. Considering that the factor is probably 1024 bits, which makes 128 bytes, that's $1562.50 for every byte! (that's money they're willing to pay YOU for a proper answer).

    Then there is always that long long integer that holds Bill Gate's fortune...

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  192. Fscked Financial Trading by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
    Last year an idot sold some futures on the DAX (German stock exchange index), the idiot reversed quantity and price (i.e., 20 x 5000) have been a couple of hundred bytes max.

    The guy had disabled the price reasonability checks so the order was sent though. Of course it matched against everything so it was impossible to reverse out the trade. Each point in the index is 25 Euros so the total loss represented by the trade is 91 million Euros. It didn't completely execute so the complete value wasn't blown, however, the reduction in the value of the DAX probably caused at least that amount of damage to index linked funds.

    Swift passwords aren't bad either (Interbank transfer system) for value per byte if you have a larcenous frame of mind and access to their network. Don't even ask how much gets misappropriated and the transactions are irrevocable.

  193. Stupid story. by 0x20 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but this story makes no sense to me.

    Gee, I wonder how much "c" is worth. It's not only the name of a language that powers an economy, it also shows up in a good portion of data.

    Or "1" and "0"... they're part of "c"... and ALL information! 1 must be worth a shitload!

  194. OK by quintessent · · Score: 2

    How about those 7 digits on a million dollar bill.

  195. "I need my space:" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woman: I need my space.
    Man: But darling you live 3000 miles from me
    Woman: I need my space
    Man: How Much Space
    Woman: I need my space

    Note: 15 bits and your world ends.

    Unemployed pissed off techie.

  196. Most Expensive Virus by Bubblesculpter · · Score: 1



    How about a major computer virus or worm?

    Some of those have cost the economy millions of dollars!

    All for just a few lines of script....

    --
    www.Beyond7.com Insane modern art water sculpture.
  197. The root password for a big company UNIX server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The root password for a big company central server costs MANY thousands of dollars per byte, if not in the millions.
    How much would cost the root password of one of the central FBI servers? Another question is how to get a connection via which you can log in :)

    Greetings
    Stefan

  198. Not a misconception at all by Hentai · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's only true from one set of perspectives. Think of it this way: Your title to the house is merely a piece of paper that says that the house is yours. All it means is that you can get men in blue uniforms with guns to show up and kick other people out of the house if you want, assuming the political climate stays roughly equivalent to what it is.

    This does not mean you "own" the house, any more than having control of the police force and the ability to break into people's houses, kill them, and take their property means you "own" the house (but then, when has that ever stopped anyone?)

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  199. Gore vs Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much did these cats pay, just for nine little tiny bits of information from the supreme court?

  200. Bombing of Coventry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To protect the secret that the Allies had broken the
    German Enigma cipher in WW2, they let Coventry get
    bombed into oblivion, despite having broken the
    German code.

    I'm not sure how many bytes you would count that as,
    but it's surely gotta be pretty expensive, in human
    terms, at least, if not in financial terms.

  201. Most valuable CD? "Black Box"? by Zurgutt · · Score: 1

    As can be seen from previous posts, if the number of bits is small, calculations get very complex, speculative and ridiculous.

    Lets pose this question another way: what would be the most expensive cd of floppy, containing some existing and theoretically obtainable data? Blueprints to something? National secrets? Sientific data?

    And another intriquing idea: lets suppose it is in our power to construct a "black box", performing some calculation on input data and outputting the result in some constant time. Lets set limit to 1 Megabyte of input and output and 1 second of processing time. What kind of black box would be most valuable?

  202. Business reseach by paulwomack · · Score: 1

    In the field of commerce, it is routine to pay a great deal of money for the single bit "buy/sell".

    BugBear

    --
    Ignorance is curable. Stupid is forever.
  203. Multibilion dollar BIT by Calomnious+Awkward · · Score: 1

    The Apollo project.
    One flag set (on the face of the moon). That is one bit of information or 1/256 of a byte. A total cost of 100 bilion $, makes 25,6 trilion $ per byte.
    But it was worth it...

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig
  204. Well naturally.. by Bemmu · · Score: 0

    The integers describing people's bank account totals. Some people spend all their lives just to add to that number.

    account[Bemmu].total = LONGINT_MAX;

  205. Rational asks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Answer: An account number and password on a swiss bank containing $100,000,000,000.
    The question doesn't seem very rational.

  206. Dude... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    It's not a "sale", it's a "share". ;-)

    Actually, it's often a rental. Check out the EQ message boards and you'll see some horror stories about people "buying" characters, changing the password, then having the seller call up EQ customer support, say "I've forgotten my password," and having it reset, thereby reclaiming the character to be sold again. And there's not a damn thing that you can do about it, because EQ characters remain the property of EQ (Sony, actually) and can't be sold or transferred. All you can do is squeal that the seller is trading, get his EQ (and probably eBay) account pulled and try and get your money back (good luck).

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  207. How about, this one; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only takes a few bytes to have the key to a secret key once used by Osama's terrorist organization to communicate commands and
    strategy about the Twin tower operation,
    should these bytes be known in time, it would
    have saved, hmm, a few millions

  208. Bytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want me to bite you, it'll cost you quite a bit.

  209. Nike Values by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
    It's the word 'NIKE' and the tick logo that ALL the value resides in - because people associate THOSE with the Nike values.

    You mean like having sneakers glued by 10 year old vietnamese girls under unbelievable conditions in a factory operated by an "indipendant contractor".

    You're right of course, that the only value is in the Nike brand. Who in his right mind would pay 180$ for a pair of sneakers that cost a couple of bucks to manufacture at most.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

  210. Napster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You could burn every single physical asset of these companies.

    Yup, that's essentially what napster is now, not a functional company, just a name people are familiar with, but someone bought it.

  211. Where's Osama? by bigjames · · Score: 1

    How about Osama Bin Laden's whereabouts in GPS coords or long/lat? The FBI's offering $25 millon. 32 bits each for longitude and latitude should narrow it down to a beard's length.

  212. USA by eMilkshake · · Score: 1

    So what are the letters USA worth?

  213. or Waterloo, 1815 by JPMH · · Score: 2

    Famously, the Rothschild brothers (who organised the finance for most of the 1815 alliance against Napoleon) got news of the victory at Waterloo back to London a day ahead of anyone else ... and did rather well.

  214. DEEP Crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8 bytes of key. $250,000.

    To prove the insecurity of DES, EFF built the first unclassified hardware for cracking messages encoded with it. On Wednesday, July 17, 1998 the EFF DES Cracker, which was built for less than $250,000, easily won RSA Laboratory's "DES Challenge II" contest and a $10,000 cash prize. It took the machine less than 3 days to complete the challenge, shattering the previous record of 39 days set by a massive network of tens of thousands of computers. The research results are fully documented in a book published this week by EFF and O'Reilly and Associates, entitled "Cracking DES: Secrets of Encryption Research, Wiretap Politics, and Chip Design."

    The Deep Crack site.

  215. Re:Headlines -- adjusted for inflation... by icey5000 · · Score: 1

    That's only about $6,573,640,280 USD (6.5 trillion) adjusted for inflation for US/USSR alone!

  216. Information worth $1000 / byte by Systems+Curmudgeon · · Score: 1

    At the Autofact show of 1985, GM and Boeing hosted a large demo booth. The goal of the booth was to prove that the now defunct MAP protocol really worked. They got 25 companies to spend money on the demo: a distributed system that took your name, packed (robotically) a tower of hanoi puzzle, printed your ID on the package, and gave it to you. The companies spent (I'm not making this up) $125 million US to develop the systems JUST for the 3-day show. (I'm counting costs that had no other value, this was show-specific.)

    5,000 of the Tower-of-hanoi boxes were given away, and show particiapnts therefore called them $25,000 gifts, distributing the booth cost among its outputs. The puzzle itself had negligible value, so let's assign that $25,000 to the pesonalized IDs, typically about 25 bytes, per package. That's about $1,000 per byte.

    While we're at it, please remeber that for most of the 1960's, mainframe memory cost 10 cents a bit, which was close to $4.50 a byte (there were check bits in those days, but computer memory was geenraly organized in larger "words" with far more than 8 bits per address). That's just the cost of storage before anything of value went into it.

  217. Most expensive bits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know if it's been mentioned, but I'll go for changing the dates from 2 digits to 4 for the Y2K bug.
    LIP

  218. value of coca cola by ragnar · · Score: 2

    I heard about a year ago that the value of coca cola in assetts is about 3 billion. By this I mean that if you added up all the property, investments and cash you could sell it for about 3 billion. However, their stock on the market (when I heard this about a year ago) is worth around 150 billion. The brand name and its solidity is worth far more than the company itself.

    I agree with the original poster that successful branding is a tremendous commodity.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
  219. Moon rocks. by mjolnir_ · · Score: 1

    Six US Apollo missions returned approx. 400 kilograms of lunar material to the Earth for study. Those samples gave probably several hundred KB of raw data: chemical and geological data (different than the untold TB or more of *analysis* of that data). The entire Apollo program also generated a huge amount of imagery and measurements of various physical characteristics, ie gravity, radiation, etc.

    The Apollo program cost tens of billions of dollars, at a time when the United States was suffering from massive social instability, as well as the lives of three Americans who died. Also spurred the Soviet Union to spend a huge amount on its own largely unsuccessful lunar program.

    Pretty expensive for a secret soundstage in Nevada.

  220. Javascripts by arnwald · · Score: 1

    Let's see, my new javascript function today brings 2000$, it's 451 characters, so that's 4.4 $ per byte. Damn, I feel ripped off ;)

    Cheers,
    T.

    --
    My other sig is Funny.
  221. $100K limit by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 2

    I periodically get a credit card offer from my alma mater, freely offering a $100,000 limit. If they're pushing a card with a limit high enough to buy a house on impulse, I'm sure I could negotiate a higher limit; maybe not in the millions, but likely a large fraction thereof. Ironically, my income is rather modest, so I don't understand why they keep offering me a card that could require several years of my net income to pay off.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:$100K limit by wackybrit · · Score: 2

      I don't understand why they keep offering me a card that could require several years of my net income to pay off.

      With your income, you're likely to have assets which can be sold if you don't make the repayments... and that's on top of the things you bought with the money (i.e. a house - and they generally only go UP in value).

      Also, if you buy a house on a credit card, they're getting mega interest on it. That's why credit cards kinda suck for large long term purchases, and why 99% of people get a mortgage instead.

    2. Re:$100K limit by G-funk · · Score: 2

      That and the fact that no agent in the world is prepared to pay the 5-15% merchant fees on the transaction, so you'll have to pay them up front as well

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  222. Re:Information wants to be expensive..."bah" by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    It is a stupid phrase, isn't it?

    It's like a bank robber saying "dollar bills just want to be free".

    I'm here to liberate your dollars and your MP3's.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  223. Lawyers... by arglesnaf · · Score: 1

    All told, my brother will have paid 250K+ for the letters esq after his name.

  224. The Original Marathon by John+Sullivan · · Score: 1

    The ancient Greek messenger Pheidippides is said to have have run so fast to deliver a message of victory to Athens, that he died having delivered it. The message contained one bit: we won.

    --
    This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
  225. We need Nat. Portman interview by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    If someone ever got Natalie Portman to post a message on Slashdot, then I bet the site would plain kneel, both emotionally and performance-wise.

    Maybe it would be possible to get her to do a slashdot interview, if prodded correctly? After all, nerds constitute a large portion of her revenue stream. She owes us that.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  226. 10-20 by lousehr · · Score: 1

    Lat & lon from GPS. $14 billion per RAND for 6 bytes.

  227. Launch codes by lrohrer · · Score: 1

    Launch codes for US nuclear arsenal. With out them several trillion dollars of hardware doesn't work and/or US ripe for invasion/blackmail. With them you could destroy the rest. The codes to retarget them too is worth nearly as much.

    Several movies valued just one nuclear bomb in at several billion.
    ----

    Then again Clinton sold nuclear secrets to China for only 10 million donation to the DNC. (and chinese money to Arkansas teachers union and several major defense contractor and free trade to China and several hundred congressmen...)

  228. And that password is.... by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


    Bill Gates credit card PIN number.

    4 bytes (or 2 using compact BCD) worth a few billions.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  229. Miscalculation by RegularFry · · Score: 1

    48 bits of ASCII code

    Yes, but not 48 bits of information. Assuming that you're only getting the messages "We Won!" or "We Lost!", that's a *maximum* of 1 bit. Once you take into account the relative probability of hearing each message by that point in the war, you've actually got far less than one bit of information in the message "We Won!". By the time the allies were in Berlin, the actual amount of information had dropped to way below 0.0001 bits, given that by that time it would have been virtually impossible for them to lose, barring acts of fnord. So your figure of $13.35 billion becomes at the most $13.35 million. Still not a number to be sniffed at, admittedly, and it increases as you go backwards in time to a maximum value (to a blind observer, who doesn't take into account any differences between the two sides) of 1 bit of information in 1939.

    Surely the value of information is always at least partially subjective? There's the example above somewhere of an EQ account, which presumably was sold to someone who had the intention of using it, rather than selling it. I doubt that the buyer's valuation of the information was based on any calculations of the value of the time that he/she could save by buying the account rather than building it up themselves - assuming an hourly rate for an IT professional who can afford to splurge on an EQ account, $1000 doesn't give nearly enough hours to build up the kind of account that would attract premium prices. It may, however, reflect the value of the time the seller put into it, although I doubt that, as well. Any estimates to the length of time needed? Any more than 200 hours, and we're into "Fries with that?" territory. Mind you, speaking as an impoverished student, that wouldn't surprise me...

    --
    Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
  230. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  231. Two examples of $100M+ bits by seanellis · · Score: 1

    Here are two examples of one-bit messages that cost over $100M each.

    1 bit message #1: Yes/no - did you detect the beacon signal from the Mars Polar Lander?

    1 bit message #2: Yes/no - did you detect the beacon signal from Pioneer 10?