Slashdot Mirror


AT-ATs Coming to a Forest Near You

Audent writes "Not strictly speaking anything any of us should classify as work related, or even open source, but holy shitbags! I want one of these. Plustech, a subsidiary of tractor maker John Deere, has built a six-legged walking logging machine that just has to be the prototype for an AT-AT walker. Imagine parking this puppy at the mall!"

411 comments

  1. Doesn't look like an AT-AT by PaxTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It does look like a giant mechanical ant though. From the videos, it looks SLOW and LOUD.

    Still, I want one.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by The+Dobber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes but if it fell would you hear it?

    2. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      It's alot quieter than the Deere tractors I've worked with.

      Alot quiter than a Detroit or Cat diesel.

    3. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by langed · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The site also shows a big simulator for training. It looks like your average 6-wheeled ATV. So, apparently they've experimented with a series of wheeled designs too. And they don't look like big green ants.

      On a side note, it rather reminded me of a grasshopper, not an ant.

      But I just want to see that simulator software GPL'd. Run it on Windows or Linux, I don't care. Even if it weren't turned into a game, it'd be cool for the geek factor! :)

    4. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by Izanagi · · Score: 1

      I saw this machine in the pre-slashdot days.

      It would make for a fun garbage(i.e. WinXP) compactor. Better yet pay the RIAA and MPAA a visit!! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH! SQUASH!

      --
      SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
    5. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by kahara00 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if WE the FINNs use this kind of machinery to cut wood, what kind of hardware you think our military uses..?

    6. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree! Windows XP is trash, and RIAA and MPAA are evil.

      Hahaha! I bash Microsoft!

    7. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      axes? hehe

    8. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 1

      Oh my God! It's "them"! Giant Ants! AAuuuuugh!

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    9. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by Blackstealth · · Score: 1

      The wheeled versions aren't protoypes or previous designs, but genuine production machinery built by Timberjack (who are a sister company to Plustech), in particular the 1270D which is another cool toy.

    10. Re:Doesn't look like an AT-AT by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      Knives and Vodka? :)

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
  2. Different Walk styles.. by Kraphty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I noticed that in one of the videos is walks with three legs at a time, keeping a tripod, and in the other it moves one leg at a time. Is there a specific reason for this? Perhaps something to do with the terrain?

    --


    Watch out, or I'll have the penguins eat you.

    Oh...and, I'm liquid talent
    1. Re:Different Walk styles.. by DaCrusierI · · Score: 1

      Stablity issues, perhaps. ... Need more stability (i.e. legs on ground) when going downhill or on any unlevel ground.

    2. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 points form a plane.

      it will never wobble.

    3. Re:Different Walk styles.. by rchatterjee · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's exactly how insects move, the alternating tripod method. For something with 6 legs its the most efficient and stable way to move.

    4. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Sweetums · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If I remember right, the alternating 3 leg movement is the best case for a 6 leg walker. There were some interesting experiments done with simple walking robots, disabling legs and such and watching how it parallelled insects with a damaged leg.

      I'd bet it depends on if there is an imbalance in weight distribution and one side can't pick up 2 legs at the same time, which would probably force it into one at a time movement. Just a guess though. Theres lots of research done on simple walking robots done with really minimal fedback control circuits. They do teh same stuff. Of course the extra degrees of freedom in the joints makes things a little harder.

      --
      ------------------------
      Jack not name, jack job!
    5. Re:Different Walk styles.. by dpbrown · · Score: 1

      Good eye. I didn't notice that. It must need to keep more feet on the ground when it's going up or down hill to keep it from beaking in. I wonder how it does going down hill diagonally. The best way to drive down a steep hill is straight down - The Fall Guy

    6. Re:Different Walk styles.. by rchatterjee · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry about replying to myself but i found a relavent link about insect movement:

      http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/entomology/topics/moveme nt.htm

    7. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

      > 3 points form a plane. it will never wobble.

      Unless its centre of gravity moves outside the triangle defined by the feet in contact with the ground.

      </pedant>

      Interested to see just how steep a slope it can traverse.

    8. Re:Different Walk styles.. by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      Thats how Most 6 legged insects move. There are a few other forms of locomtion. The wave techique is used when there are many legs, but can be used with 6 legs. There are even multiple methods for four and two legs. Ever watch a horse move through the different gates. Humans with two legs even have choices, of course the best place to observe them female movment on a beach, with a beer in hand. But I digress.

    9. Re:Different Walk styles.. by rchatterjee · · Score: 1

      Insect by definition have 6 legs (unless damaged), Centipedes are arthropods and spiders are arachnids. The wave method you mention is used by milipedes and centipedes.

    10. Re:Different Walk styles.. by McCart42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gaits: they're a tradeoff between efficiency (speed) and stability (not falling over). Insects seem to be the best example: starting with millipedes and centipedes, which move one set of legs at a time in a serial pattern over many legs...moving all the way up to cockroaches, which nearly always move with tripod gait, which allows them to skitter so quickly across floors and scare the living bejesus out of people.

      Props to EECS 391: intro to artificial intelligence...

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    11. Re:Different Walk styles.. by freaq · · Score: 1

      excuse me, do you mean
      </pedantry>
      ?

      --
      united states nuclear device terrorist bioweapon encryption cocaine korea syria iran iraq columbia cuba
    12. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      Humans with two legs even have choices, of course the best place to observe them female movment on a beach, with a beer in hand.

      What, like little girls skipping? Perv.

    13. Re:Different Walk styles.. by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Actually, the "pedant" tag references "pedant mode", which is where the pedantry actually takes place.

      [/nitpick]

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    14. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Imperator · · Score: 2

      On flat terrain it kept only 3 legs on the ground at a time. Walking downhill (in the other video) it kep more feet on the ground at a time.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    15. Re:Different Walk styles.. by UberGeeb · · Score: 1

      Possibly, the driver was manually controlling one leg at at time, as opposed to letting the control software move three legs at a time. Direct control would allow the driver to ensure that each leg was in a solid footing before letting the vehicle weight shift to it.

    16. Re:Different Walk styles.. by UberGeeb · · Score: 1

      Actually, I remember seeing something a while back about many insects _not_ using a tripod gait. All I remember specifically was cockroaches, which ran only on their hindmost legs.

    17. Re:Different Walk styles.. by PD · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually arthropods cover spiders, centipedes, and insects. Arthropods is the phylum. Centipedes are class Chilopoda, spiders are class Arachnida and order Araneae, and insects are class Insecta.

    18. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT may not be an AT-AT walker, but is sure as hell could be a MECH! Anyone here seen Robot Wars (not the TV show, but a B movie that came out in the early 90s or perhaps late 80s)? Imagine the Army using a couple of these guys, beefed up with better engines and thick armor, and replacing that arm with a rather large machinegun and grenade launcher assembly. It'd be great for navigating tough terrain that a Tank couldn't traverse, and it'd be hella-intimidating! Also has the benefit that it would be a lot less likely to step on a mine... and what's an anti-personell mine going to do against a VERY Well armored foot (read - solid steel)?

    19. Re:Different Walk styles.. by troc · · Score: 2

      There was me thinking he meant watching women walk along the beach whilst carrying beer ;)

      i.e the women were carrying the beer.

      whatever

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    20. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-personell mines are only used by non-good millitaries, and cannot usually even stop a car... (military without air-filled wheels that is) But if that thing stepped on an anti-tank mine, it would loose a leg, and a lot of stability. If it passed over an anti-tank mine it would be blown to pieces... (getting a pretty powerfull anti-tank charge up through its belly usually stops everything). And it definately is far too slow... The Tiger drives at 60 mph, and that would be hard to beat for that thing... I mean any mechanical walking device made the next 100 years...

    21. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't be too sure about this.
      cars were invented 100y ago. see how they have advanced since the early 12km/h slowmotion verhicles designed to replace a single horse. ;)
      hey, and keep in mind that this is only the second prototype of a relatively new technology that has never before been available to the public. imagine some big automobile companies turns to that and tries to improve it, the speed of progress would immediately skyrocket.
      especially if you got military uses for that, we would see a totally silent, 80km/h fast, armored walker with a computer controlled gatling gun that even has a small radar footprint and costs 200M each.
      don't complain about a lack of speed compared to "normal" tanks that can drive 80km/h or more on the battlefield under combat conditions. that is true, BUT: military helicopters fly 350km/h at max, military jets more than 2000km/h. helicopters still have a very broad range of uses and can not be replaced by jets. left alone the fuel consumption of jets and 80km/h tanks, i could imagine thousand uses for a rather silent moving and stealthed AT-AT hiding in the woods. give it a gauss cannon or a high energy infrared laser and no jet pilot or tank crew passing by will ever know what hit them. it would work like an anti-armor sniper that can wreck just about anything... while air-to-surface rockets may seem quite powerful against armies of iraq and afghanistan, they have almost no chance against modern armies equipped with "patriot" or "goalkeeper"-systems. thats why the USAF puts infrared lasers on its joint strike fighters. (do they fight strikes?)
      heck, you could even make your walker non-armored with ultra-light materials, carbon etc. and then have retractable wings and some propeller etc. and voilà you have an ornithopter.

    22. Re:Different Walk styles.. by fishiswa · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, if you want to be that anal, I think he has the beach with a beer in its hand.

    23. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Dakisha · · Score: 1

      Worrying that it was the first thing to come to your mind when he said beaches and females.. Do you think of pedophilia often?

    24. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Nightpaw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually it was the combination of females and alternative 2-legged gaits, of which skipping is one.

    25. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Flick · · Score: 0

      It's all a lie...

      There is no way that anyone could build a machine like that! It's just like when they faked the landing on the moon. And you guys just believe this stuff!

    26. Re:Different Walk styles.. by errxn · · Score: 1

      And, are these walks officially sanctioned by the Ministry of Silly Walks?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    27. Re:Different Walk styles.. by colmore · · Score: 2

      The KPCOFGS system has always bugged me. (pun intended) It's a a more or less arbitrary system, that only does a so-so job of reflecting evolutionary descent.

      But I can't really think of a better replacement.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    28. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The best way to drive down a steep hill is straight down

      true, but then again the best way to walk down a steep hill is often diagonally - at least for us bipeds, anyway. it's harder to fall over sideways, or in a direction you're not moving. wonder if that's still true for a hexapod, or if something analogous applies.

      dammit, now i wanna go work for this company! playing around with machine-controlled gaits for a living sounds fun!

    29. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Callamon · · Score: 1
      Just need to scale it up a bit.. Make it say, 60 feet tall or so, with each foot the size of a tank. Then it could move much faster and would not have much trouble with mines.

      Oh, and put the operator in the "head" instead of on top, and make the head movable.. And put a couple laser cannons in the nose of the head. And you could use the body for carrying troops and other equipment.

    30. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Yup.
      Robot Jox
      That movie was even worse than Millenium.

      But it was nice to see those fights.
      That black woman doing a kick, turning into a 6 foot tall bearded stunt man.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    31. Re:Different Walk styles.. by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Ah, found it. Biorobots at CWRU. This is a good place for more information about the walking behavior you're talking about.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    32. Re:Different Walk styles.. by jimwelch · · Score: 1
      From the web site (emphasis mine)

      The walking forest machine is Plustech's best-known innovation. The goal of product development was a machine that has the best possible working stability and minimum impact to the terrain.

      The walking machine adapts automatically to the forest floor. Moving on six articulated legs, the harvester advances forward and backward, sideways and diagonally. It can also turn in place and step over obstacles. Depending on the irregularity of the terrain, the operator can adjust both the ground clearance of the machine and the height of each step.

      The machine's nerve center is an intelligent computer system that controls all walking functions - including the direction of movement, the travelling speed, the step height and gait, and the ground clearance. The harvester head is controlled by the Timberjack measuring and control system. To further optimize machine operation, Timberjack's Total Machine Control system (TMC) regulates the functions of the machine's loader and engine. All control systems are designed for ease of use. The operator-friendly controls are incorporated in a single joystick.

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    33. Re:Different Walk styles.. by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      And put on armor that's "too strong for blasters!". But of course you've still got to worry about harpoons and tow cables...

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  3. an improvement by faeryman · · Score: 5, Funny

    the harvester advances forward and backward, sideways and diagonally. It can also turn in place and step over obstacles

    Good. Maybe then those pesky forest rebels will have a harder time wrapping thier grappling hooks around me when I'm out logging.

    --


    ,
    faeryman
    1. Re:an improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Who knew? the empire was just another large logging conglomerate!

    2. Re:an improvement by PD · · Score: 1

      I noticed that your nick is "faeryman". Are you the lumberjack of fame sung about by the Monty Python comedy troupe?

  4. AUGH!!! by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    WANT ONE!!!!

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:AUGH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant?!? shouldn't this be labeled as "Me too!"?

  5. They look rather insectile. by krinsh · · Score: 1

    I wonder if anyone else will take a look at this for other all-terrain applications? On the other hand, they appear to move very slowly.

    (BTW, I feel the use of language in the main article is a bit innappropriate. Don't tell me there's anything holy about them either.)

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    1. Re:They look rather insectile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      BTW, I feel the use of language in the main article is a bit innappropriate.

      What the fuck are you talking about?

    2. Re:They look rather insectile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - the language is a little much for the front page...comments are one thing, but it's very unprofessional for text in the article.

    3. Re:They look rather insectile. by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      (BTW, I feel the use of language in the main article is a bit innappropriate. Don't tell me there's anything holy about them either.)

      Boy are YOU in the wrong place.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    4. Re:They look rather insectile. by sfled · · Score: 1

      Unholy peeboxes.

      --
      I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    5. Re:They look rather insectile. by Brummund · · Score: 1

      Holy holy, let's get back to the bat cave. :-)

    6. Re:They look rather insectile. by esper_child · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First think I thought of when I saw it was to mount guns on it. Maybe a 20mm gun or a .50 cal minigun (neither being in a fixed mount). Would be quite useful for military applications, and wouldn't surprise me if it was already being developed with some in mind. Refine the technology enough and you will have some really nice battle platforms for ground operations. maybe we can make it look and act like a scorpion too :)

    7. Re:They look rather insectile. by uhlume · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...*blink* You object to the use of language? I suppose you'd rather see the author attempt to make his point with gestures and inarticulate grunts.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    8. Re:They look rather insectile. by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 0

      im telling you. using these in the open desert painted desert-camo, with 20mm and 50 cal guns would be insane! especially if they have a way to navigate trenches and banks.

      woohoo! imagine a "squat" option which limits profile to next to nothing. legs fold in... top of ridge traifing of many people... then they run out of the hills on 6 legs... psy-warfare baby! paint teeth on em!!

      damnnnn.

      --
      "I think, therefore I get paid."
    9. Re:They look rather insectile. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      how about incomprehensible equations?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:They look rather insectile. by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      Ooooh... scale 'em down a bit and you'd be getting pretty close to the Fuchikomas of Ghost in the Shell fame. Very cool. From the military standpoint, it'd be great for mountainous/broken terrain operations. Intimidation factor a plus.

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    11. Re:They look rather insectile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      {best sam elliot voice}
      Have it your way, dude.

    12. Re:They look rather insectile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, so long as you have aerial superiority i guess... but if an attack chopper or fighter bomber comes over the horizon, i'll be the first guy the hell outta these slow beasts, if you don't mind. :)

      in fact, unless they can be speeded up a bit (or loaded up with a *hell* of a lot of armor), even just a plain old artillery barrage wouldn't be much fun in them, i don't think. i've been on the dishing-out side of a few of those, and i never wanna see one from the receiving end.

    13. Re:They look rather insectile. by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Perhaps he knows of some way for the editors to write besides using language. :)

      TV Show Host: You can't use that kind of language on TV!
      Beavis: We use language?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  6. Wonderful... by WeekendKruzr · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Because of course the world certainly needs newer, bigger, and better ways to cut down even more trees.

    1. Re:Wonderful... by Eccles · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because of course the world certainly needs newer, bigger, and better ways to cut down even more trees.

      If they could harvest efficiently with this puppy without clear-cutting or requiring tractor-trailer-capable roads, it could actually be ecologically beneficial.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And shoot ewoks.

    3. Re:Wonderful... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It also needs more knee-jerk comments from uneducated people. Thanks for doing your part today!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Wonderful... by alan_d_post · · Score: 1

      Probably better than building logging roads, though.

    5. Re:Wonderful... by thule · · Score: 1

      If you read the web page:

      "The goal of product development was a machine that has the best possible working stability and minimum impact to the terrain."

      So they are trying to make things better.

      I also heard that a few years ago they started de-barking the trees on location so the chips can fertilize the ground.

    6. Re:Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we need more vague and condescending, yet factually barren posts as well. Bravo!

    7. Re:Wonderful... by 10+Speed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a properly managed forest is a renewable resource

    8. Re:Wonderful... by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you ever seen a logging operation in action? Didn't think so. The fact is that the tractors that are used tear up a good sized swath and compact the soil making it harder for the forest to re-assert itself. This six-legged beastie is a great idea if they can make it competetive with current logging vehicles as it will reduce the ecological impact that logging has and that's a good thing. It's not like all research put into logging tech is bad; for example the use of log skidders (bulldozers pushing logs from where they've been cut to where they're put on the truck) has been greatly reduced by stringing up huge cables at the top of the hill being logged. Logs are attached to said cable and are carried downhill to log landings to be put on waiting trucks. This results in less damage done to the log so less needs to be logged and fewer necessary roads and less use of skidders meaning lower environmental impact and quicker restoration of the forest.

    9. Re:Wonderful... by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      I want to see one scurry, and I do mean scurry, around the woods carrying a tree. Then the lumber companies might be interested.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    10. Re:Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I also heard that a few years ago they started de-barking the trees on location so the chips can fertilize the ground.

      And as everyone knows, de-barking trees is really good for them...

    11. Re:Wonderful... by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      This is a better example of recursion then Elvis dieing and coming back as a Elvis impersonator.

      -- 90% of all percenatages are made up on the spot

    12. Re:Wonderful... by JoeBlows · · Score: 0, Troll

      well, becasue the tree huggers who want to save forests went too damn far, now there are 200% more trees in the forests than there were 150 -200 years ago....IE, 200% more fuel to get those flames up to crown fire tempraturs so we can have more efficent ways of burning millions of acers of forest.

      good job.

      --
      True capitalism = lots of similar companies = jobs for everyone who wants one.
    13. Re:Wonderful... by sould · · Score: 1

      These things are designed so that people can log in hilly country where logging before was not possible.

      I for one will to start investigating grappling hooks, etc.

      No other way to take on the logging bastards.

    14. Re:Wonderful... by Helter · · Score: 1

      No, but if the tree has already been cut down we really don't care what's good for it, now do we?

      On the other hand, leaving as much of the tree behind to decompose IS good for the rest of the trees.

    15. Re:Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe you

    16. Re:Wonderful... by Helter · · Score: 1

      Logging isn't neccesarily a bad thing. I personally have seen logging in effect my entire life on some land that my family owned, and the parts of the forest that were logged were much healthier and much more receptive to wildlife than the parts that weren't.

    17. Re:Wonderful... by Chad+Stansbury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, logging roads have turned out to be very beneficial for fire fighting here in the West. Turns out that fire crews would have a much more difficult times getting to the remote (and as is the case here in Denver, not so remote) burns. Not only do logging roads help get the equipment to the burn site, but they also provide a good fire break.

      Just goes to show that nothing comes free in this world.

    18. Re:Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, it's also these same tree huggers that _start_ the forest fires while they're out "being one" with nature (and forgetting to put their fires out/burning notes from boyfriends/cooking weenies/etc/etc).

    19. Re:Wonderful... by JoeBlows · · Score: 0, Troll

      ok..don't but I suggest you read most of the popular news and research before you shrug me off.

      --
      True capitalism = lots of similar companies = jobs for everyone who wants one.
    20. Re:Wonderful... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
      On the other hand, leaving as much of the tree behind to decompose IS good for the rest of the trees.

      Encouraging canibalism among trees is a good thing? :-)

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    21. Re:Wonderful... by alan_d_post · · Score: 1

      Why are these fire crews needed at all? Surely towns in areas that burn should expect major fires to come. Houses in remote areas of the west should expect to burn to the ground periodically.

      I understand that we have a temporary problem of over-accumulation of dead wood and brush because of the last hundred years of fire suppression. Does this mean that we need logging roads through every bit of vegetated land in the west?

    22. Re:Wonderful... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      Because of course the world certainly needs newer, bigger, and better ways to cut down even more trees.

      There are more trees in our country now than when Columbus hit the shores. Why? Because people buy them, so the logging companies keep planting more.

  7. Lethal looking motherfucker... by sfled · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...a little bullet-proof glass, some armor & weapons...the little bitch is made for close-quarter urban demolition zone warfare.

    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
  8. How long until it's hacked? by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I imagine someone's already working on a hack to make this bad-boy dance the funky chicken. It'd be cool to watch a bunch of them dancing in sequence...

    1. Re:How long until it's hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine someone's already working on a hack to make this bad-boy dance the funky chicken. It'd be cool to watch a bunch of them dancing in sequence...

      If you know who we'll offer you a reward....er wait, we 'encourage' you to find weaknesses. Report them to your local authorities, they WILL take care of YOU er...the weaknesses.

    2. Re:How long until it's hacked? by Flarelocke · · Score: 1

      Now THAT's how to play Dance Dance Revolution.

    3. Re:How long until it's hacked? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      It'd be cool to watch a bunch of them dancing in sequence...

      Especially if they got a line of SDR as backup dancers. And then, suddenly, Dancing to an Electric Boogaloo 2002.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:How long until it's hacked? by southpolesammy · · Score: 2

      ROTFLMAO...

      One of the best laughs I've had in weeks. Just picturing it in my head brings a smile to my face. Thanks.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  9. evil by khold · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all we need is to put the friggin laser (the high powered laser mounted on a jet) and mount it on the friggin 6 legged logging machine.

    --
    rm -rf sig
    1. Re:evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, wan't that a spiderman episode...

    2. Re:evil by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      What about that gauss gun that guy was building from disposable cameras. A couple of those and you really are getting towards a nice battlemech. Perhaps some particularly bored and suicidal slashdotters could be persuaded to arm some of these up to the teeth and fight it out in a battle to the death. I for one would quite like to see CowboyNeal get a bolt of white hot plasma up his ass.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    3. Re:evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to play an Evil Genius on /. then you need to get the lingo down.

      They are frickin' lasers, not friggin lasers.

    4. Re:evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What about that gauss gun that guy was
      > building from disposable cameras. A couple
      > of those and you really are getting towards
      > a nice battlemech.

      Ok, the fallacy has to stop somewhere, it might as well be here.

      A pure gauss gun is almost useless as a weapon. It takes significantly more electrical energy to accelerate a projectile to lethal speeds than it does chemical. The chemical energy is also easier to transport (How many wall outlets do you think there are on a front line?) and requires much simpler (therefore cheaper and more robust) equipment to use. The only way a gauss gun will see combat any time in the near future is as a hybrid weapon. IE: regular old firearm with a gauss boosting stage.

      Thank-you and goodnight.

  10. AgroMech's! by xdroop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool -- Nice to see the underpinnings of BattleMechs are coming along nicely. I'll be flying my Phoenix Hawk LAM any century now!

    --
    you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    1. Re:AgroMech's! by Maran · · Score: 2

      "I'll be flying my Phoenix Hawk LAM any century now!"

      Yeah, but then you'll get sued by Harmony Gold for copyright infringement.

      Although a few medium lasers would sort that particular problem...

      Maran

    2. Re:AgroMech's! by jafac · · Score: 2

      Hell, just talking about it violates the DCMA. Call the cops!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  11. Aieeeee by Sirion · · Score: 1

    MAN those things are loud. At least the operators at a nice interior with their 120 decibels of pain. (Though noone else will ever know quite how loud the videos are, once the first thousand people try to download the 7 megs of mpegs off of their site within the next 3 minutes. :)

  12. It moves like a 6 legged cat by gelfling · · Score: 2

    In the movies it lifts its feet like a cat. This is the cool ass machine of the year.

    1. Re:It moves like a 6 legged cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I've never seen a six-legged cat.

    2. Re:It moves like a 6 legged cat by happyclam · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Where the hell have you seen a six-legged cat?!?!

      Or, more to the point, how in the world would you know how a six-legged cat moves?

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    3. Re:It moves like a 6 legged cat by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      Too bad that two-headed kitten didn't live long. Would have been cool seeing that thing as an adult. I have seen a 6 legged cow, but the extra two weren't exactly usable. There was, I think, a two-headed snake that did quite well.

      Ripley's Believe It or Not, what a great place!

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  13. ~Imagining~ by Kedanoth · · Score: 4, Funny
    Imagine parking this puppy at the mall!

    Yeah, that would rock, until I see an old lady with a cart full of soda cans pass me at full speed on the mall's perimeter road. ~sob~

    1. Re:~Imagining~ by cHiphead · · Score: 0

      ... but isn't that what the 50mm autocannon on the roof is for?

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  14. What are the costs? by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's nice to see someone trying to lower the impact on forests, but if this machine costs too much to opperate, it won't sell. Margins are EXTREMELY important to logging companies. That's why they have to low ball the Fed. Gov. to harvest in public forests and why the US logging companies lobbied our Government to impose those protectionist tarriffs on the Canadians.

    If this company wants to make a go of this, they're going to have to make a military version. I don't know about you, but if I saw one of these things comming at me, I'd run for the hills!

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

    1. Re:What are the costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It probably isn't for logging. Mount twin .50 caliber machine guns and it would be great for dealing with tree-spiking Earth First!ers.

    2. Re:What are the costs? by still+cynical · · Score: 1

      After watching the video, I'd say you could STROLL for the hills! :-)

      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    3. Re:What are the costs? by CaptainPuppydog · · Score: 1

      That's why they have to low ball the Fed. Gov. to harvest in public forests and why the US logging companies lobbied our Government to impose those protectionist tarriffs on the Canadians.

      Actually, when one looks at the tariff issue, one finds it weird that raw logs are exempt, as are log homes (built here, disassembled and shipped to the US)... also it I find it strange that the tariff level =(approx) exchange rate... and the fact that the tariff funds go directly to the complaintant lumber companies (ruled Bad by a recent WTO preliminary finding...). The lumber companies were in a no lose situation... get the tariff, their timber holdings value goes up, they get the money from the tariffs, the competition goes down, they can charge more for their product... the two losers are people buying homes in the US (dimensional lumber is Not exempt), and millworkers in Canada (3 mills shut down so far in BC with approx 700+ jobs gone)... sigh. I believe the WTO also recently issued a prelim finding that the US's previous 19% tariff to be Bad as well... no word yet on the current 27% tariff...

      The joys of being so close to the US I guess...

    4. Re:What are the costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logging!? Why the hell would anyone think of logging when all the goddamn forests are on fire?

    5. Re:What are the costs? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2

      It's nice to see someone trying to lower the impact on forests, but if this machine costs too much to opperate, it won't sell. Margins are EXTREMELY important to logging companies.

      Clearly you've never seen one of these loggers operate. They're pretty common because in spite of their high initial costs, they are extremely efficient.

      The harvester head grips a tree near the base and cuts the tree off. The arm is strong enough to control the descent of the tree so it doesn't fall back on the operator. (see the Phase I photo)

      As soon as the tree hits the ground, the two wheels that you see will pull the trunk through and trim the trunk to lengths specified by the operator - to maximize the use of each log. As it pulls the log through, the branches are stripped and left on the ground to decompose. And it's FAST.

      The whole process from grabbing the virgin tree to loading the logs on the truck takes about 15-30 seconds. It's absolutely amazing to watch how fast it works, especially if you've ever had the privilege of taking a tree down with a chainsaw. It can take a tree down every 60-120 seconds - look at the length of the boom on the harvester in the top photo.

      Look at the videos on the simulator page. It shows more of the process. In fact, the simulation looks a little slower than these do in practice.

      The wheeled vehicles are problematic because of the amount of debris this process leaves behind. The walker should be able to cruise through forests, plucking out trees without compacting the ground, or destroying much other foliage.

      The next real problem is extracting the logs from the forest where they're left. It'll cut a truckload of logs in 15 minutes. There must be a legged forwarder in development that just brings logs to the trucks to haul off.

      I think they also incorporate forest management systems in these as well. The harvester measures the diameter of the tree when it locks on so the operator can reject a tree which is too small. I think there's a GPS device in the harvester that records the locations of the trees for the forwarder to find, but also to track which trees are going to mature when. The next season, they can optimize where they cut.

    6. Re:What are the costs? by ces · · Score: 2, Informative

      I note this was developed in Finland. I suspect logging machines with a low impact on the forest environment are more popular in Scandinavia and Europe in general where there is a greater belief in sustainable forest practices than in the US or Canada. Also if these machines are fairly effcient at logging compared to traditional thinning or clearcutting practices I can see them being used in the US, after all many of the machines used in logging are already quite expensive, heck in some places they log with helicopters!

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    7. Re:What are the costs? by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      Why do you assume that this company needs to sell in the US and Canada to make money? The original company that designed this is based in Europe (namely Finnland). And there lower impact on the forest ground is extremely important. In Europe there is more selective logging than elsewhere and hence something like this would go miles.

      North America does not practice that much selective logging. Most of it is clear cut, with replanting. The only place where selective logging is partially used is on the West Coast. On the West Coast selective logging must be used because otherwise there would be no more grand trees.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    8. Re:What are the costs? by renderhead · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you, but if I saw one of these things comming[sic] at me, I'd run for the hills!

      The hills? You fool! That's where they are designed to operate!

      Besides, I don't think you'd need to run. Judging from the movies of these bad boys in action, a casual stroll for the hills would probably do the trick.

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    9. Re:What are the costs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just walk toward the hills...but it can walk up the hills too... hmmm...

    10. Re:What are the costs? by hopews · · Score: 1

      I bet a disaster/rescue version of this might do well in post earthquake or post bombing rubble. Its flexibility might expedite digging out the remains of the world trade center. Although I suppose in case where the stability of the rubble is in question, or there are people under it, stomping around might not be such a good idea.

  15. (+5 Informative) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The submitter is probably one of the people you see out on the road who drives a huge fucking gas-guzzling SUV and acts all fucking tough to make up for that they have a fucking tiny penis.

    1. Re:(+5 Informative) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to someone like you who has to attack the penis size of others in a vain attempt to quell his own pent up rage caused by his own sexual inadequacy.

    2. Re:(+5 Informative) by farfolen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      touche!!!

      --
      werd to yo motha, muh nizzle.
    3. Re:(+5 Informative) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to someone like you who has to attack the penis size of those who attack the penis size of others in vain attempts to quell their own pent up rage caused by his own inadequacy to quell your own pent up rage caused by your own sexual inadequacy. Yeah

  16. Silly submitter... by Flamerule · · Score: 2, Informative

    We must be careful with our Star Wars nomenclature. Both in tactical operation area (um, the woods), size, and appearance, this wood-cutting thingy most closely resembles an AT-ST, not an AT-AT. I think this may invalidate the numerous rebel grappling-hook jokes I see popping up. Unless that rope they used to trip 1 or 2 of the walkers in Return of the Jedi were grappling hooks....

    1. Re:Silly submitter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get beat up a lot?

    2. Re:Silly submitter... by delta407 · · Score: 2

      Actually, there was an AT-AT in Return of the Jedi, in one shot on the lower-left side of the screen.

    3. Re:Silly submitter... by delta407 · · Score: 2

      No, I'd say they're closer to AT-PTs. Though not strictly Star Wars canon, the design is much closer.

    4. Re:Silly submitter... by OneFix · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing here...Anyhow, I kinda like the AT-STs more...they're definately faster and are realy meant as an anti-troop weapon. The AT-ATs are realy meant to take on buildings and such. It's kinda like the A-10...There's just something facinating about a machine that is built for nothing but "mowing down troops". Take a look at a video of the A-10 firing it's big gun.

    5. Re:Silly submitter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We must be careful with our Star Wars nomenclature.

      Why do I get the feeling you're a virgin?

    6. Re:Silly submitter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The AT-AT in SW:ROTJ is actually quite obvious. What most don't realize is that there is an AT-ST in SW:TESB.

    7. Re:Silly submitter... by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Actually, the A-10 is in no way, shape or form an antipersonnel weapon. It was conceived, commissioned, designed, built, and deployed as a dedicated antitank attack plane. That big gun you're drooling over makes it one of the most effective tank-killers on the modern (or any) battlefield.

      It's remotely possible that it could be used against personnel as a secondary mission (maybe with bombs), but since personnel are protected from heavy weaponry by both the Geneva Convention and the Warsaw Pact, it's highly doubtful. I know for a fact that the calibre of the gun is far too large to be legally targetted against troops. Furthermore, the milk-crate-sized rounds it uses are far too expensive to expend against anything but big-money targets (where their muzzle velocity and the extreme focus of their penetrating power makes them very cost-effective).

      [/nitpick]

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    8. Re:Silly submitter... by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Actually, the ones in Episode II (which are called AT-TE's) are the closest
      because they have six legs. The AT-AT's had four and the AT-ST's only two.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    9. Re:Silly submitter... by OneFix · · Score: 2

      Well, according to one of the documentaries on the History channel I belive, the specified use was always for tanks, but in reality...the whole idea surfaced out of the cold war and the "remote" threat of soviet occupation of the US. The whole idea was really that if this were to happen (it was certainly a possibility then)...All of that would pretty much go out the window and what we really needed would be what is essentially a flying tank with a bad-ass gun.

      And I'm also quite aware that the gun heats up fairly quickly, which means that it wouldn't be so easy to take out a whole bunch of troops.

      Of course, if I'm not mistaken, a good bit of these were use to drop Napalm in Vietnam...needless to say the A-10 is still a great asset to the military...I mean, the whole plane is designed to carry that huge-ass gun.

    10. Re:Silly submitter... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      I hope there's somebody there to slap you...

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    11. Re:Silly submitter... by WEFUNK · · Score: 1

      Of course, if I'm not mistaken, a good bit of these were use to drop Napalm in Vietnam...needless to say the A-10 is still a great asset to the military...

      Thanks for the interesting theory about the A-10 as a flying tank rather than just a tank-killer, but just to let you know, the A-10 was not used in Vietnam. It was developed to fill a void in close air support that became obvious during Vietnam. The first prototype flew in 1971 and the first production aircraft was completed in 1975. The A-10 was well on its way to being retired before it finally had a chance to prove itself in the Gulf War. They are to be replaced by the new JSF. And just to get back (closer) to topic, with their heavy armour, redundant systems, and "titanium bathtubs", it would take a hell of a lot more than a bunch of Ewoks and their logs to knock one of these planes out of the sky... Although several were lost in the Gulf War, A-10's have made it back to base missing just about everything you ever thought a plane needed to fly and to keep the pilot safe. Wow.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    12. Re:Silly submitter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right till you say it LOOKS like an At-St. Are you some kind of fuckin idiot?? At-St are 2 legged scout transports. This thing has 6 legs, so it looks MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH more like the 4 legged At-At then the At-St. Go get a fuckin clue.

    13. Re:Silly submitter... by Drachemorder · · Score: 2
      since personnel are protected from heavy weaponry by both the Geneva Convention and the Warsaw Pact, it's highly doubtful.

      If you're about to lose a war and have your nation taken over or wiped out, would you care anything about what "international law" says?

    14. Re:Silly submitter... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Probably not. The point is that currently only one country has this plane, and that country isn't currently at risk of losing its homeland to an invader, and knowingly targetting personnel with that gun would be a war crime, and firing milk-carton-sized shells made of a material that you can only get from spent fission reactor fuel rods would be laughably cost-ineffective, it's a safe bet that the A-10 was never intended as an antipersonnel weapon (and has never purposefully been used as such).

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    15. Re:Silly submitter... by jafac · · Score: 2

      Additionally, though the GAU-8/A's 30mm Depleted Uranium shells are easily capable of penetrating the side-armor of most tanks, it's most effective against the TOP armor, which is often thinner. Easily done from the air.

      Also, the gun has such significant recoil, that it's hooked up to the plane's engines. When the gun fires, the engines fire up. Otherwise the plane would lose too much airspeed when it fires.

      Also, the gun is very long - consider about HALF the length of the A-10 plane.

      I don't see the GAU-8/A being put deployed in a land vehicle any time soon. Walker, wheeled, or tracked. Just wouldn't be half as effective.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    16. Re:Silly submitter... by jafac · · Score: 2

      There's actually a lot of really cool design built into this plane.
      It was designed for low altitude, risky missions. Killing tanks or other hardened targets.

      It was designed with two engines, so if one got shot-off, it could still fly. Dual rudders, both for the same redundancy purpose, and also to block IR emissions from the engine's tailpipes as viewed from the side. It was also designed to be able to fly with half a wing blown off.

      Also has the best payload options as far as armament goes in the whole US arsenal of warplanes. More hardpoints, more total carrying capacity.

      Very tough planes. Never vary popular, because of their looks, compared to other planes - until they were proven in the Gulf War.

      There is a lot of talk about when these planes are retired, that they could be very easily repurposed to fight forest fires, due to their incredible carrying capacity, and quick turnaround time on the ground.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    17. Re:Silly submitter... by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      It was designed for low altitude, risky missions. It was designed with two engines, so if one got shot-off, it could still fly. Dual rudders, both for the same redundancy purpose, and also to block IR emissions from the engine's tailpipes as viewed from the side. It was also designed to be able to fly with half a wing blown off.

      I have three words in response to that:

      Engineers. Kick. Ass.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    18. Re:Silly submitter... by arban · · Score: 1

      I do believe it more closely resembles the MT-AT Transport (expanded universe).

      --

      "You like Chinese food." -Fortune Cookie
  17. real? by tps12 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Those pictures look like they were rendered in 3DMax or so. I cannot view the videos, since I run Linux (Linux forever!), but I'm skeptical...do they have a prototype, or just some pretty animations?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? You need Xine or VLC or Mplayer or .

    2. Re:real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't view mpg's in Linux? I guess some people are too dumb to run Linux, or maybe just like to bitch a lot. (I get to swear because they did it in the post).

    3. Re:real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm saddened that your blatent troll garnered 3 responses thus far. Those slashdotters need more edumacation!

    4. Re:real? by flacco · · Score: 2
      I cannot view the videos, since I run Linux (Linux forever!)

      What the hell are you talking about? there are a half-dozen viewers for linux. I just watched it minutes ago on gtv.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    5. Re:real? by phutureboy · · Score: 1

      Yep. Xine displayed it just fine for me.

    6. Re:real? by sulli · · Score: 1

      You are correct, there are a lot of viewers for Linux.
      Hardly any Linux user goes very long without installing them.
      But apparently tps12 is a little bit clueless, or else just hasn't gotten around to installing mplayer.
      Thanks for pointing it out, though, as some other users might find it of interest.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  18. a 6 legged cat^H^H^H killing machine by MouseR · · Score: 2

    I give it 2 years before it makes it into the military.

    1. Re:a 6 legged cat^H^H^H killing machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only place this thing would be an improvement over current wheeled or tracked vehicles is in mountainous terrain. I don't think we'll be invading the Himalayas or Atacamas anytime soon.

    2. Re:a 6 legged cat^H^H^H killing machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the military would invest a lot of money in something like this if they could get these machines moving a bit faster and make them more versatile (ever seen those walking toys that fall on their side and can't do anything? they'd have to work that out).

      Of course, just imagine seeing something that looks like a large mechanical tiger charging through the forest towards an enemy base, dodging trees and other obsticles with ease.

    3. Re:a 6 legged cat^H^H^H killing machine by onosendai · · Score: 1

      I'll give you $10 that it's already in the military

      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
    4. Re:a 6 legged cat^H^H^H killing machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the us is just about to invade anything - what did you do the last year - hiding in a cave with no cnn?
      hey, it's the mountains where those ultra intelligent and incredibly evil top-terrorists are hiding, you know?
      oh and by the way we now have the possibility to even invade switzerland in the next war. last time they had too much alps around them making any attempt to take them futile. but now HAR HAR HAR

    5. Re:a 6 legged cat^H^H^H killing machine by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      ever seen those walking toys that fall on their side and can't do anything? they'd have to work that out)

      It loks like the center of mass for this thing is low enough that anything that could tip it over on its side would be enough to give a wheeled/treaded vehicle problems too. I think the big problem would be keeping the legs moving correctly if they're going at a high rate of speed. Wheels and treads are nice because they're so simple. Round and round and that's it.

      Psychological effects of weapons are cool, but they don't last long. Familiarity breeds contempt, and so forth. So unless it's inherent in the design (like it is here :), one shouldn't really spend much effort towards that end.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  19. Ted Geisel's spinning in his grave... by Lurkingrue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone else think this looks like one of Dr. Seuss' worst nightmares?

    Somewhere, a Lorax is crying...

    1. Re:Ted Geisel's spinning in his grave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Pretty soon, even Loraxes will be extinct...

    2. Re:Ted Geisel's spinning in his grave... by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1


      Unless...



      There's always hope...right?

    3. Re:Ted Geisel's spinning in his grave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This machine was on a dutch tech program a few years ago. The entire idea here is so safe the forest, or at least it was back then.
      This machine can walk through the forest without destorying the ground or young growth. Of course they still cut down trees but now they can select individual trees to harvest without destorying the landscape around it. Better then the whole-sale logging they do now I think.

  20. For 500 bucks extra.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    .. they'll throw in a free Chewbacca custom.

  21. AT-AT dead ahead! by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trooper: Sir, small green AT-ATs approaching!

    Rebel Officer: Damn! Are you sure?

    Trooper: Yes, can't you hear it? ... Its that loud "lawn-mower" sound... Kind of like a trash-compacter...

    Rebel Officer: Oh yes... Whats the ETA?

    Trooper: Well, given their current rate of speed, I would say 2... no make that 3 weeks.

    Rebel Officer: Good work Trooper - We had best begin to pack up the base and move out by no later than... noon tomorrow.

    Trooper: Roger roger.

    --

    my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    1. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by Maeryk · · Score: 2

      Trooper: Sir, small green AT-ATs approaching!

      Rebel Officer: Damn! Are you sure?

      Trooper: Yes, can't you hear it? ... Its that loud "lawn-mower" sound... Kind of like a trash-compacter...


      Officer: are they coming for tea?

      Trooper: No Sir.. I think its worse than that.. they have a FLAG.. (and saws)

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    2. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      Officer: are they coming for tea?
      Trooper: No Sir.. I think its worse than that.. they have a FLAG.. (and saws)


      Eddie Izzard?? He simply rules :)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    3. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      They're loud and slow to give the trees a chance to get out of the way. Rather sporting, don't you think? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by inerte · · Score: 1

      Or the Elvis that protect the forest. These drunk little bastards never know when to leave.

    5. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by dboyles · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trooper: Roger roger.

      Roger Murdock: We have clearance Clarence.

      Captain Oveur: Roger, Roger. What's our vector Victor?

      Tower voice: Tower's radio clearance, over!

      Captain Oveur: That's Clarence Oveur! Oveur.

      Tower voice: Roger.

      Roger Murdock: Huh?

      Tower voice: Roger, over.

      Roger Murdock: Huh?

      Captain Oveur: Huh?

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
    6. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      ...damn clever of them.

      --

      -pyrrho

    7. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by MrCreosote · · Score: 2

      "Elvis has left the forest!"

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
    8. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Hooom. Yes. I might agree with that. Hooom. Give me a day or too...

    9. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Hoooom. Yes. I might agree to that. Hooom. Give me a day or two...

    10. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      1st generation of StarWars walkers?

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    11. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It appears that you were mighty hasty posting this twice. Harroooom.

    12. Re:AT-AT dead ahead! by jjsoh · · Score: 1

      LOL. Very hilarious.. Thanks! :)

  22. Gates has one already... by kingkade · · Score: 1

    Didn't you know? All diabolical, evil genius' have one of these. Duh.

  23. Re:BETTER LATE THAN NEVER by DaCrusierI · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    fp you jew nigger spic raghead fucks

    What kind of idiotic, insensitive and utterly pointless comment is that? Wow, we've got some true pricks on this site

  24. military version by lingqi · · Score: 5, Funny

    would probabbly look a lot like the "tank" in [Ghost in the Shell]. which would make sense, IMO, because the manuverability would be *so* superior to track-driven tanks.

    well, with a couple decades of engineering work to make it move faster and more adaptable, anyway.

    at the mean time, i want to see a consumer version for *real* off-roading. and the crane thing can be used to grab hot women out of their convertables while dozing around downtown LA.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:military version by Saeger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sure, legged maneuverability is great, but you'll have to trade off speed and ruggedness for something the size of a tank ('AMIE' from the movie Red Planet is a cool beast though).

      A conventional tank's armor protects its means of locomotion pretty well (like a tortoise), but legged creatures have it all hanging out there.

      Just concentrate your attack on the weak joints and it's game over.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:military version by guttentag · · Score: 2

      So by the time we invade Iraq, these will be about 100 feet tall, manned by Desert Storm Troopers and equipped with laser guns? This gives Saddam time to equip his air force with grappling hooks. Only I thought this scene was supposed to take place on the tundra...

    3. Re:military version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, used to making links on E2 I see.

    4. Re:military version by lingqi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hmm... you know...

      1) if you rip the belt / track with a mine, etc; a conventional tank is out of service. i assume a military version of a walker can walk with 4 or 5 out of the six legs, albeit slower, etc

      2) there are "armored" creatures in nature too where the legs are not exposed. think armadillo for example

      3) same goes for humans as to the "attack on the weak joint". that's why there are such things as ARMOR. hell, take a look at a medieval knight and how every joint they have are armored.

      lastly, with *enough* manuverability you no longer even have to worry about being hit (as much), because you can
      a) dodge the damn shells (lateral movement)
      b) get to them before they get to you (terrain adaptability advantage)
      c) get to a place where they can't get to you or where you would have a significant tactical advantage (climb a steep hill / up side of a building, etc)

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    5. Re:military version by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

      Just concentrate your attack on the weak joints and it's game over.

      No, I played that game. I had to shoot a magnetic grappling line at it and fly around it a few times. Then it fell over and blew up.

    6. Re:military version by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually by the time we invade Iraq, even if we had them, they would sit unused. Deserts are almost ideal for tank battles. I still have an excellent book by a military stratigest, written from the stand point of being at the WWII African battles, he actually went down to study these. Since by and large tank strategies haven't changed alot since WWI or even before, the strategy didn't change the peices just got bigger. Our tank heavy forces are nearly unbeatable. That is one of the main reasons Desert Storm, was so much more successful than Vietnam. Wheeled and tracked vehicles don't have many disadvantages to walkers on flat open ground. This might get used in heavly damaged urban areas, but that would be about it.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    7. Re:military version by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Major problem is...trees.

      There's not a lot in the way of terrain that can't be negotiated by a tracked vehicle. Yes, there are some steep slopes that are tough to climb, but frequently those are covered with trees. Hard to drive a tank through trees.

      Modern MBTs have a speed of 30+mph over broken terrain. Outside of Mechwarrior, no legged vehicle of anything like the mass of an MBT comes near that speed.

      Legged battle machines seem like a cool idea, but I don't see the advantage that outweighs their fragility.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:military version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why the tank in "The Ghost in The Shell" has a shield surrounding it which took quite a few hits (if i recall) before being shut down.

    9. Re:military version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but you can't dodge my super-duper-laser!
      Then we make super reflective anti-laser armor...
      ... but we will make a rail gun.
      ... but but my invulny shields will stop your rail gun...

    10. Re:military version by wheany · · Score: 1

      dodge the damn shells (lateral movement)

      The real world doesn't work like the Matrix. Those damn shells travel at several hundred meters to kilometers per second. Dodge that!

    11. Re:military version by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

      It MIGHT be possible, given sufficient systems for detecting the trajectory early enough on, and sufficient distance to the gun. Of course, the movement would be too jerky for humans, but the machines are becoming autonomous anyway. Secondly, if you dodge a direct hit, you will still suffer some damage when the shell hits the ground a few feet away.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    12. Re:military version by zoombat · · Score: 1
      There's not a lot in the way of terrain that can't be negotiated by a tracked vehicle. Yes, there are some steep slopes that are tough to climb, but frequently those are covered with trees. Hard to drive a tank through trees.

      Hmm.. would they be useful in ground combat in a forested area? In the same way that an armored unit is vulnerable without foot soldiers (and vis versa), the two together are formidable.. but in a forested setting it seems like we have to rely on solely foot soldiers on the ground since tracked or wheeled vehicles wouldn't be able to manuever between (or through) the trees. Would it be helpful in those situations to have a an armored legged vehicle with some mounted heavy weapons?

      Also, it seems like the legs could be at least partially protected by some sort of skirt around them. It might look like a big ballerina or something, though...

    13. Re:military version by jafac · · Score: 2

      Maneuverability is superior to track-driven tanks only in very bad terrain or close quarters. But out in the open, the tank's ability to go 50-60 mph would still be unmatched. Getting outmaneuvered or encircled is a bad thing.

      So a "walker" tank would only be of benefit in areas where you're trying to flush out troops that have hidden someplace where tracked tanks can't go. (like the remote mountains of Afghanistan?)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:military version by Moofie · · Score: 2

      Seems to me like any sort of heavy weapon is going to be a long-range weapon, and the mean free path in a forest is pretty short.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm no expert on armored warfare doctrine, and there may well be a place for a system like this...but my suspicion is that a much much smaller (say, man sized) powered walker would be far more useful and flexible than one the size of a tank.

      Assuming, of course, that it can be made to be FAST. Slow things die on modern battlefields, unless they're REALLY good at hiding.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    15. Re:military version by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      pray tell, what's the name of the book?

    16. Re:military version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manuverablity would *suck* compared to treads. The M1A2 weighs *70 tons*. Can you say ground pressure?

    17. Re:military version by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Panzer Battles by Maj. Gen. F. W. Von Mellenthin. Its very good, but quite technical, I found it quite similar to reading disertations, not as bad as say IEEE's Spectrum, but certainly not bedtime/beach reading for me.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    18. Re:military version by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      You can probably find it fairly cheap in used book stores, there was a reprinting of it in paperback, after Schwarzkopf had it on his desk during a major interview. If you're really interested here's a cheap copy on ebay, not mine, as I still haven't finished it.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    19. Re:military version by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      danke herr nelson.

  25. If I saw it cumming at me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, sure, I'd run for the hills, too. And would pray to find no horny hillbillies trying to fuck my ass, like they did to Jon Voight in "Deliverance"...

  26. Holy shitbags by mangu · · Score: 1

    I belong to the Holy Shit Church, and that robot there is *exactly* what we need to handle the bags full of the Holy Shit. We are getting one as soon as we can find a patron wealthy enough to finance it.

  27. Imagine doing crowd control in one of those! by crovira · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let one of these these suckers on a crowd of rowdy drunken students or, after equipping it with 3D trackball controlled armament, wrapping it in titanium and Kevlar, on a throng of maniacs and religious zelots enacting scenes from "Palestinians VS Jews, Episode 28,000"

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  28. Terrain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The goal of product development was a machine that has the best
    possible working stability and minimum impact to the terrain.

    Yes, chopping down hundreds of trees is def. minimal impact.

  29. Where are the wacko's complaining about deforestat by danbeck · · Score: 1

    Where are the wacko's complaining about deforestation? Our "dwinding" tree supply is almost run out here in America! WHERE IS THE UPROAR? I CAN ONLY SEE A MILLION TREES IN MY BACKYARD! SOMEONE HELP US!

    er... sorry.. just figured any article that mentioned trees should have some misinformed idiot complaining about the 3 trees we have left in the world due to evil Americans. Just helping keep the community stay alive...

  30. needs claws by mr_burns · · Score: 5, Funny

    HAIL ANTS!!!!

    This thing needs pneumatic claws so it can grip the sides of mountains and buildings. Walking a cliff face or wall vertically or horizontally would be a requirement for any kind of urban deployment of this technology

    Also, it should look more like an actual giant armored space ant.

    turret with high powered water/foam/fire cannon would be a nice option. Perhaps with harpoon/grappling hook gun with high test line on gear reduced winch. That way it would be able to swing from building to building and fight fires, mothra or those angels from evangelion.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
    1. Re:needs claws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yes. we all need more skycraper-climbing walking machines to handle the pressing forestry and logging needs of our largest cities.

      or perhaps you were picturing a deep forest uber-machine that fights crime in the middle of f*cking nowhere?

    2. Re:needs claws by happyclam · · Score: 2
      Also, it should look more like an actual giant armored space ant.

      Have you seen an actual giant armored space ant? You must be the same guy that said this walks like a six-legged cat.

      :op
      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    3. Re:needs claws by C+R+Johnson · · Score: 1

      You mean like these? Okay, its only 1 claw. But the head does swivel.

      --
      The alternative to limited government is unlimited government.
  31. rover by !splut · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think we've found the perfect replacement for those boring Mars rover designs. I'd like to see this think hobbling around the red planet taking mass spec measurements of things.

    And when the Martians come to investigate the lander, it'll be alien stompin' time! Ka-krash!

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
    1. Re:rover by klparrot · · Score: 1
      Too bad it probably takes thousands of times more power than solar arrays and batteries can provide to a Mars rover.

      Hmm, so it deforests and probably wastes huge amounts of energy too (walking takes effort; see quote below). Nice. :P

      X-Homer: They have chairs with wheels? And here I am, using my legs like a sucker!

  32. Way to rip off Memepool...again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Slashdot's "journalistic integrity" just seems to be getting better and better.

    I have to go shower now... I just used "Slashdot" and "integrity" in the same sentence.

  33. But can it run like a deere? by LauraLolly · · Score: 2

    My ten-year-old is in love with it. Oh, cool! will it ever be seen at state fairs in the NW?

    I wonder if we can convince Deere to have one at the state fair in Iowa.

    Woohoo!

    1. Re:But can it run like a deere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait to see one at the Heny Machinery Field days in Oz

  34. speed bumps by Garion911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Awesome! Now I'll never be bothered by speed bumps, I can just step over them!

    Oh wait...

    --
    Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
  35. Well fuck by Com2Kid · · Score: 0, Troll

    That is it, mankind has officaly gone to f*cking far.

    Yee freakin gads folks, this is like something out of a science fiction horror movie, big ass machines going around eating up trees? Well fuuuck, all we need is some slave labourers to be pushing it along rather then using gas and we'd have ourselves a nice dim bleak ass future.

    I repeat.

    fuck

    1. Re:Well fuck by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1, Troll
      Yee freakin gads folks, this is like something out of a science fiction horror movie, big ass machines going around eating up trees? Well fuuuck, all we need is some slave labourers to be pushing it along rather then using gas and we'd have ourselves a nice dim bleak ass future.

      I repeat.

      fuck
      Writer looking for greeting card publisher Inquire Within

      LMAO -- Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a WINNER. Top prize for the best comment-content-to-sig mismatch of the year!
      Can't wait to see your portfolio, Sport!
    2. Re:Well fuck by Com2Kid · · Score: 0

      Helloooo, giant six foot robot walzing around tearing down trees, how the hell is mentioning the closeless of this to any number of dark sci-fi stories a troll?

  36. excuse my ignorance by loomis · · Score: 1

    Excuse me if I'm totally off base here, as I know nothing about logging. This machine seems to be more friendly to the environment, and that's its selling point or whatnot. But isn't logging like destroying the habitat anyhow, thus making this machine's eco-friendliness moot?

    Loomis

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:excuse my ignorance by 10+Speed · · Score: 1

      as far as I know just about all of the commercially harvested forests in North America are replanted after harvesting.

      They are a renewable resource.

      However one of the problems with some of the comercial methods is errosion through wind and rain of the disturbed soil (very important in some catchment areas). This machine goes along way towards eliminating that by causing almost no damage to the surface it treads upon.

    2. Re:excuse my ignorance by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 1
      I know what you're saying, but what I think they're trying to do is eliminate a lot of the logging infrastructure that's needed to log. You need to cut roads into the forest to move all the heavy equipment into the area - even it's just to remove only a portion of the trees. With this, you could walk in and grab just the trees you want - hopefully, without cutting down a shitload just to get your trucks in. The question is: can it do it and still be profitable? Otherwise, the logging companies will just keep using their VERY destructive ways. IMHO.

      Anyone out there in the business to add to this?

      --

      There is no spoon or sig.

    3. Re:excuse my ignorance by 10+Speed · · Score: 1

      no longer in the business but...

      forests are harvested in sections...generally the roads are already there as trees need maintenance throughout their life cycle (pruning and thinning to ensure a good quality of timber. If a road is pushed through, the trees in its path are almost always harvested, not wasted as you seem to imply.
      There is a possibility that your a basing your views on 3rd world logging operations shown on tv. These are different to those run in North America...

    4. Re:excuse my ignorance by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Replanting after defortesting doesn't get you back a forest.

      While trees are renewable, forests are not, at least on anywhere near the same time scale. But yes, perhaps something like this could let trees be taken without destroying the forest. Perhaps. Maybe.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:excuse my ignorance by 10+Speed · · Score: 1

      Most forests are cycled so that sections are cut and other sections are harvested in a continuous cycle...Sure there are times when some areas only have seedlings in them, but that is offset by the areas that have fully grown trees in them...That is the theory at least...

    6. Re:excuse my ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Visit an industrially managed 'forest' in Finland (Plustech is a Finnish company). Besides looking like a field of uniform trees without too many other species growing, the conventional tractors turn the ground pretty much upside down. After logging, it looks like a war zone. Then the forests are also criscrossed by service roads for trucks so that the trunks can be tranported out. I don't know if the walker tractor is ever going to be commercially viable, but there is certainly room for improvement in the current logging hardware.

    7. Re:excuse my ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >This machine goes along way towards eliminating
      >that by causing almost no damage to the surface
      >it treads upon.

      Well, yes and no... from what I've understood, the harvester itself doesn't cause much damage to the surface, but unlike traditional wheeled harvesters, it cannot move the trees it has cut down. So you need a truck to pick up the logs, probably negating any environmental advantage gained by using the walking harvester.

      Also, the harvester is way too slow and light to be economically feasible. It would probably be useful as a pr stunt ("we really care about the forest") but doesn't have much real production value.

      Very fancy technologically-vise, though. I bet the r&d engineers have had lots of fun building this thing.

    8. Re:excuse my ignorance by uncle_ben · · Score: 1

      One of the most damaging aspects of logging as i see it is the machines that wheel around the woods destroying all the undergrowth. This one is a tiptoeing machine that'll leave all those little blueberries still pickable. I'm no logger but i have seen many places just totally raped due mostly to wheelmarks etc.

      --
      # everything zen? don't think so.
    9. Re:excuse my ignorance by bogomipe · · Score: 1
      Trees have a very neat feature included per default: THEY GROW BACK!

      Come to Finland where this contraption was developed and you'd see what I mean: trees, trees, trees and trees until you're sick of them. And at the same time, we're home to many of the world's leading paper companies.

      Yes, it might come as a shock, but trees actually grow back when properly dealt with.

      --
      - mipe -
    10. Re:excuse my ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Forest can survive the cutting down of trees, after all trees die all the time and new ones grow back. The traditional problem is that logging companies cut down entire forest in one go, cause machine style harvisting was impossible otherwise. This leaves the ground open to be washed away by the first rain and you get deserts where you had forest. This is bad.

      this machine helps in two ways. Cause it is more manouvrable it can walk around trees and take only a select few of the trees, say 1/3 of the trees leaving the others standing. Also very important is that it don't cut up the ground, apparently from a program I saw on the first protype its foot print is about the same weight as a human/deer. So when it puts its foot on a sapling the sapling will bounce right back.

      All in all this machine would allow logging companies to use machines and yet be selective. If it works, prototype was years ago and it still is in testing, it could make a real difference. Of course the noise is very high, but the same a regular forest machines.

  37. Can't view mpegs? by Jon+Howard · · Score: 3, Informative

    I cannot view the videos, since I run Linux...

    Dude! Get MPlayer or Xine. There are others, but those two seem to be pretty well done.

    1. Re:Can't view mpegs? by lamz · · Score: 2

      He must run Linux the way Toonces the Cat drives a car...not very well.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  38. chris dibona(r) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shitbag? isn't he talking about you chrisd?

  39. Eco-goodbye by greygent · · Score: 2

    Great... yet another mechanism to destroy the Pacific Northwest's (formerly) vast forests, after "buying" them from the corrupt US Forest Service.

    1. Re:Eco-goodbye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save a tree, wipe your ass on a spotted owl.

  40. Fuel Spent vs. Fuel Harvested by Jon+Howard · · Score: 2

    Considering that these things burn some kind of fuel, and that they harvest wood which can also be used as a fuel (or turned into methyl alcohol to create fuel), what do you suppose the ratio of fuel spent to fuel harvested is for these puppies?

    I'd bet it leans heavily to one side, specifically the spent one.

    1. Re:Fuel Spent vs. Fuel Harvested by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • Considering that these things burn some kind of fuel, and that they harvest wood which can also be used as a fuel (or turned into methyl alcohol to create fuel), what do you suppose the ratio of fuel spent to fuel harvested is for these puppies?


      • I'd bet it leans heavily to one side, specifically the spent one.
      Uh, NO FUCKING SHIT DUDE

      It is called entropy, if you find a way around it tell the rest of us, k?

      EVERYTHING in life, let me repeat that, EVERYTHING in life takes more energy then you get out of it, logging included. You never get more then what you put in.

      Mankind is an pro-entropic entity, we help the universe along to its eventual heat death! (or else we couldn't exist. ^_^ )
    2. Re:Fuel Spent vs. Fuel Harvested by farfolen · · Score: 1

      I don't think much logging is done for teh prupose of fuel refining...

      --
      werd to yo motha, muh nizzle.
    3. Re:Fuel Spent vs. Fuel Harvested by canadian_right · · Score: 2
      It can't be worse for fuel than using helicopters, which is quite common when logging rough mountain sides where road building is expensive, and has undersirable environmental effects (even more so than for flat land).

      Big trees are worth quite a bit of money.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  41. Downsides by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    (sniff sniff) "Sir! I think your car stepped in something on the way to work this morning."

  42. Congratulation for trying by metoc · · Score: 1

    Star Wars introduced that AT-AT twenty years ago, and ALIENS the CAT walking forklift 15 years ago. Back in reality we have seen walking machines in labs for decades.

    So after decades of research, the only commercial walking machine you can buy is an AIBO, and you can only lease a Honda ASIMO.

    Is the walking lawn tractor slow and noisy? Yes, but so were IBM 360s and Ford Model Ts.

    So congratulations to a company willing to do the hard R&D. With luck they will have a commercial machine on the market in a decade.

    And then we can start hacking!

  43. Whew! by eyepeepackets · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm so glad I saw this article here before I ran into one while hiking and found myself wishing I had brought a change of underwear. Not only that, but I'd probably never, ever again eat those funny mushrooms.

    Thanks Slashdot!

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    1. Re:Whew! by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Offtopic reply:

      Your sig should really say, "Everything in the universe blows", not "sucks". A friend's physics teacher in high school taught his class the phrase, "Physics doesn't suck. It blows." If you're in a pressurized ship in space (i.e. vacuum), and you open a door to the vacuum, the actual newtonian force that moves you out of the ship is the atmosphere pushing you out. There's no "sucking" force. ("Suction" is really just the effect of a high-pressure area pushing into a low-pressure area.)

      Well, that's enough physics for the day. :)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:Whew! by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Hiya,

      Well, two things. First, one day I was reading on /. and I was seeing a large number of negative posts, which resulted in the sig. I wanted to poke fun at all the negative posters and I have this love of the double entendre. Second, "suck" is a reference to the gravitational force which, if I remember correctly, manifests in all things with mass, so a more accurate sig might say "pulls" instead of sucks, but that would kill the double entendre.

      Thanks for the post though, was interesting.

      Cheers,

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    3. Re:Whew! by Saeger · · Score: 1
      That's funny, because I distinctly remember my Highschool chemistry teacher saying, "Nothing sucks OR blows, there's only differences in pressure."

      ;-)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  44. What's the point? by alchemist68 · · Score: 0

    What's the point of creating a machine that has minimal impact on the terrain of the forest? It's cutting down the damn forest, freakin' idiots. The forest is going to be a god damn barren field when they're done with it. Who cares if there are tread marks in the ground? Does anyone think the logging industry is concerned about environmental impact of the forest they are destroying? Yeah, I thought so...

    1. Re:What's the point? by Helter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Do you actually know anybody in the logging industry? No? I didn't think so.

    2. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the question isn't so much if he knows anyone in the logging industry. It's whethe he has any clue about modern forestry. He does not.

  45. Hardly news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... this is hardly news. Me and my roommates built a few of these over spring break freshman year. We had some interest from a few of the local loggers, but not enough to mention it on Slashdot. Maybe this should be classified in the "Been there, done that Dept.?" or perhaps just wait for something new to come around before posting to Slashdot.

  46. Slow and loud? Huh? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Have you ever even been around any construction/industrial equipment or machinery in your life? That thing is not loud by any means. In fact, until I watched the videos, the impression I was getting from all the loud comments was that this thing sounded like a jet engine or something (kinda like my comp sounds, heh). This thing is suprisingly quiet. I mean, if you listen closely as it walks, you can even hear the chains on its feet dangle and clank as the feet pads move. Sure, it isn't museum quiet, but your typically lawn mower is probably louder than this thing. I'll agree that it isn't all that fast, but I think the speed is almost just right for walking through forests, you don't wanna run into trees going too fast now.

  47. Wrong!!! by univgeek · · Score: 1
    It is called entropy, if you find a way around it tell the rest of us, k? EVERYTHING in life, let me repeat that, EVERYTHING in life takes more energy then you get out of it, logging included. You never get more then what you put in.

    And next you're going to tell me that NO nuclear reactor can produce energy? Or that pumping oil from the ground takes MORE energy than we get out of the oil?

    You may think that you know thermodynamics, but you DON'T!!!

    --
    All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    1. Re:Wrong!!! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Or that pumping oil from the ground takes MORE energy than we get out of the oil?

      Hello Mr "I can't think back any further then my ass."

      How is THIS one for you.

      Energy gone into producing oil:

      Dinosaurs born, big ass trees grew, dinosaurs ate trees, died, turned to oil. We pump oil out, burn.

      Now then, you have entropy going all to hell throughout there, you have the energy used up by the trees, by the dinosaurs, by the dinosaurs EATING the trees, and so forth. Energy IS used and spread about, there is NEVER A NET GAIN IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF SHIT THE UNIVERSE HAS TO PLAY AROUND WITH.

      Just because YOUR sorry ass did not have to sweat to make something work does not mean that somebody (or something) else did not use up the energy!

    2. Re:Wrong!!! by Flarelocke · · Score: 1

      He wasn't disputing that the amount in the universe is constant, he was disputing the idea that the amount in any given subset of the universe is constant. We take in energy from the outside. That's the counterpoint to entropy that allows us to function. A nuclear reactor spends fuel that would require more energy to produce than would be released in the reactor. Thus, we acquire more from the environment to sustain the process. All of these processes that acquire materials for energy production must necessarily acquire more energy than it expends, or it would be counterproductive. The energy was always there; we just go and get it.

      Now, the previous post argued that all processes must decrease the total amount of energy available; this is not true because not all energy is available.

    3. Re:Wrong!!! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      All of these processes that acquire materials for energy production must necessarily acquire more energy than it expends,


      And I am arguing that it only 'aquires' more energy if you only look back short term! Looking back long term there is 0 net gain.

    4. Re:Wrong!!! by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're going to try to randomly repeat what smart people once said, at least try to get it right.

      Remember the tuna sandwich rule: When you eat a tuna sandwich, you profit in energy. If this wasn't true, people would die of starvation eating tuna sandwiches.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  48. Mecha PS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're interested large scale mechanized walkers, check out www.mechaps.com They have a facility in California for building 2 legged mechs. Their site is kind of lax on the details, but their forums have more information.

  49. Now all the eco-terrorists have to do... by Kredal · · Score: 2

    Is wrap the legs of these things with cables a few times, and *CRASH* the walkers come tumbling down... Come on, haven't they ever seen Empire Strikes Back?

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Now all the eco-terrorists have to do... by Zyrmfxl · · Score: 1

      I have always wondered exactly what kind of super space material those damn "tow cables" were made of. Somehow strong enough so that three coils of that... um... black string could somehow stand up to the power of between four and sixteen massive hydraulic lifters. Uh... Yeah.

      Theory: The black string was actually organic in nature, and infused with billions upon billions of mitichlorians. Hm... I should write for LucasArts.

      --
      "Oh, well I'm sorry if you don't appreciate my random murders!" - Crow T. Robot,
    2. Re:Now all the eco-terrorists have to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The string is probably made from carbon nanotubes. This is the same stuff that has been proposed to create a space elevator with a very thin line of the stuff.

    3. Re:Now all the eco-terrorists have to do... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Say it's a cable with tensile strength X. Say that the walker can exert 500X force with it's hydrolics.

      Now, note the direction that the walker has to push in order to break the cables, and note the direction the hydrolics are actually set up to push.

      This is a simple case of leverage, the cable wins.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  50. Less logging my ass... by greygent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're obviously not clued in on how the logging industry works. These advancements will in NO WAY WHATSOEVER reduce logging. It will, however, increase profit, but don't think for a second that logging companies are going to log any less of their "purchased" parcels of land.

    1. Re:Less logging my ass... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You obviously missed his point. :)

      There will be more logging, the world is growing, and wood products are needed. This 6 legged beast can save land by not crushing it like a bulldozer, so the forest grows back quicker.
      The solution is not less logging, its reforestation and proper management. These machines are just tools to help. If there was no requirements to reforest, companies would just use large machines and flatten the land, its much easier.

      *But* this technology is only for American forests (we have laws about our own soil). Companies like Citigroup and Boise Lumber cant get away with that in the America. But the rest of the world, its rape and pillage time.
      -
      Beer Good, strippers and beer better...

  51. posted already by aaronsb · · Score: 1

    Heh. I replied with a link about this device in an older article. I believe it was the build your own battlemech posting. Wheee!

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/07/26/1216 25 3&mode=nested&tid=159

  52. Other fun legged machines by big+tex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if you think the logging machine is cool, check out the Spiderplow http://www.spiderplow.com

    I worked on a crew that used one of these, installing fiber optic cable down the median of an interstate. The frickin' thing can go through the legs of highway signs, climb off of an 18-wheeler trailer SIDEWAYS, and stand on 1 leg while it's ripping.

    The controls seem to be a little more involved than the logger, though. It's got a panel of about 30 two-way levers to control all of the motions. each leg can extend/retract, swivel forward/back, raise/lower, rotate each wheel right /left independently, plus about a dozen controls for the fiber burying blade.

    Spiderplow = more bandwidth.
    John Deere Forester = toilet paper.

    It's ovious which one is the high-tech toy for the nerds :)

    --
    I think I need a new sig here.
    1. Re:Other fun legged machines by BgJonson79 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spiderplow = more bandwidth.
      John Deere Forester = toilet paper.


      With all the shit on Slashdot, isn't more toilet paper good?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    2. Re:Other fun legged machines by RegularFry · · Score: 1

      Holy Spider Bikes, Batman! Someone's been playing too much Dark Reign!

      I can't believe how cool that thing is.

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    3. Re:Other fun legged machines by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      If we're talking plows... I prefer the PL2. It's a Subsea plow owned by Saipem and it looks mean (it gets used to trenching things like undersea oil/gas pipelines and fibre optics)

      You can see some brief info on it here. The thing weighs 150 tonnes, and operates at depths of up to 400m. Not the kind of beast you want to meet in a dark alley at night. ;P

  53. *drool* by Viper118 · · Score: 1

    OK, now that is just sweet.

  54. So you can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    march around blinding people left and right...

    1. Re:So you can... by Zaak · · Score: 1

      I'd say that a 100kW IR laser at close range would do a lot more than blind you. In fact, your incandescent ash would probably blind plenty of people by itself.

      TTFN

  55. Can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to see one of these at the Henty Machinery Field days here Down Under.

  56. Not at all by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those legs are way too vulnerable.

    Imagine rope or netting looped around a couple. I doubt they have much power for moving, simply strength for holding up. Think of your own legs when someone tied your shoelaces together. A puny little shoelace and you couldn't break it with your legs! One of the few things I believed in whatever Star Wars episode that was (New Hope?).

    The legs need armor, but trying to armor them individually and completely would add way too much weight and bulk.

    Consider a tank -- all that armor on the sides and some on the top. Battleships armored the individual turrets, but almost all the rest was on the sides and under the deck. Individual compartments were not armored. Not even magazines had their own armor, they were simply buried as deep as possible within the armor.

    1. Re:Not at all by Charm · · Score: 1
      One of the few things I believed in whatever Star Wars episode that was (New Hope?).

      Return of the Jedi. Which features the impressive battle on the forest moon of endor. AT-ST were destroyed by a combined ewok and rebel alliance army. Methods used were logs, and ropes mainly. The AT-ST were tripped or smashed.

      Empire Strikes Back. Battle on Hoth. Some AT-AT were destroyed by the Rebel alliance as the Empire moved in on their base. The Alliance managed to evacuate on time. Snow speeders harpooned the legs and then flew around the AT-ATs until they tripped over. Luke also destroyed one with his light saber and a grenade IIRC.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    2. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the few things I believed in whatever Star Wars episode that was (New Hope?).

      You doubt the Star Wars documentaries?

    3. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Starwars you had walkers with either 2 or 4 legs so there was no redundancy on the AT-ST and maybe 1 leg for the AT-AT. The legs were also much longer/taller in relation to the main carrage.
      This vehicle is rather squat and has six legs. It could possibly afford to loose up to 3 legs and keep moving (not all along one side).
      Not much you can do about the light saber though :)

    4. Re:Not at all by NorthDude · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, if it looses 3 legs, it means that it will be left with one leg only on one of its side. Won't be able to move with that.
      It can't afford to loose more then 1 leg per side...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    5. Re:Not at all by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2
      Actually, since these things are going to be moving some rather large logs around, I would think that they might have rather strong legs. A net would still trip them up, but it would probably be able to get free.

      As for armor, the legs could be built out of stronger material, as opposed to actually putting 3 inch thick plates on them. And since this is a slow one or two man vehicle, I don't really see being on the front lines in the middle east. Possible as a scouting vehicle, or to move vehicles that are stuck in the sand. Until we start fighting where there are trees or other obstacles that would slow a normal apc or tank, we probably won't be using these too much.

    6. Re:Not at all by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --I doubt they have much power for moving, simply strength for holding up. --

      I bet you doubt wrong. Those legs are hydraulic with plenty of power. A little rope is not going to tip this thing over. Besides the operator can see and is not blind.

      I think this is a great idea. It can probably go just about anywhere. The enviromental impact is much less than a track vehicle would be. The only negative might be the cost and maintenance. Those hydraulics might have to be maintained more than a track vehicle.

      This is great. I'm glad slashdot posted this one.

    7. Re:Not at all by phorm · · Score: 1

      So equip the legs with razor-sharp protrusions or blades then? Suddenly spider-tank just becomes a lot meaner, and I would think twice about jumping on it to attack the operator then too.

    8. Re:Not at all by jafac · · Score: 2

      Most likely, the first application of such a vehicle militarily would be to tear down Palestinian houses. The Israelis already have some fairly specialized vehicles designed for this purpose.

      In fact, this would be a great combat engineering vehicle if you think about it.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  57. An improvement over the AT-AT by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    They also built its body closer to the ground, making it harder to wrap with a harpoon line.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  58. Another Misconception abounds by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most environmental groups either worry about the effect of logging on local wildlife, or the rampant destruction of trees in south america.

    The fact that a cool-ass tree-cutter comes along really doesn't bother them too much. Its more of the parking lot thats gonna replace the tree they hate more.

    --
    | - | - |
  59. Re:BETTER LATE THAN NEVER by nelsonal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you don't want to see them set your preferences above 0 or so. However there is some pretty good stuff that gets missed or occasionally suppressed at 0.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  60. Diamond Age by boredman · · Score: 1

    First thing that came to mind was a prototype chavline, a la The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson. Granted, the chevaline had four legs and no enclosed cockpit, as I recall. Still, that's the first thing that sprang to my mind. Wow. I want.

  61. hmmm by SlugLord · · Score: 1

    Why isn't it green?

    It is a John Deere after all. (well it's from a subsidiary anyway)

  62. give it time.... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    think what a mess cars, bikes and motorcycles were at first..... i'm sure in time it will destroy the forest like nothing else...... if anything else is left to destroy by the time they perfect it.
    actually when you consider the time they probably spend accessing logs by building roads and what not......

    NO WAIT! SCREW THIS! they should only be logging forests they planted to log in the first place. if the forest floor is rough and messy, then it is meant to be left alone. i hope the Army takes this project over and uses it to shoot rebel scum. please leave the trees alone. thanks bye!

    1. Re:give it time.... by mestreBimba · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't feed the trolls but......
      Have you ever been in a forest? Timber is one of the few sustenable resources that most countries have. You cut it down (don't clear cut) replant and thirty years later.. viola new full size trees. There is a lot of private land held by the timber industry that is cut and replant and recut land. A good chunk of it is in rough terrain.

      Now forest floors may be rough terrain for a number of reasons. Geography and topography is the major one, but a creeper like this could just step over deadfall, boulders and bramble without having to remove them. Thus minimizing environmnetal impact.

      Timber is a resource that is renewable when managed correctly.

      --
      Fly Fish? Participate in our forum
  63. Looks cool, but what does it do? by Brant · · Score: 2

    I watched the videos, and I can't imagine this thing hauling logs around and keeping balanced. What would this actually be used for in a logging operation?

    Brant

    1. Re:Looks cool, but what does it do? by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2
      Cutting logs without damaging young trees and the rest of the forest.

      It's not meant to haul a pile of logs. Just the one that it cut. If you look at the second photo, that shows exactly what it's going to do. Cut a log, strip it of it's branches (I've seen those cutters before. That's what the roller looking parts are for), and stack it for some other truck to haul away.

  64. Re:Where are the wacko's complaining about defores by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, if used wisely (which as always is a big if), something like this could be quite good for helping to stop deforestation. No roads need to be cut into the forest, and no clearcutting; instead a couple of guys with these could pick out a tree here, a tree there, and still leave the forest basically intact. It's like plucking a few hairs from your head here and there, vesus shaving one spot.

    Oh, and the question is not "tree" supply. It's forests. A forest is more than just a bunch of trees, ya know.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  65. Every time.... by Restil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I see something like this.. I get inspired..

    That doesn't mean I accomplish anything useful...

    That just means I'm destined to spend the next year attempting to one up that thing.. just because I know I can....

    Until the next project comes along....

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  66. My PC can connect to that thing! by paul248 · · Score: 1, Funny

    According to my Windows 2000 "System Properties" dialog, my PC is already AT/AT compatible! I guess I won't have to buy a special interface card now.

  67. Good hoax - but no cigar by bangzilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Go to the John Deere home site http://www.deere.com/en_US/deerecom/johndeere_worl dwide/index.html - no mention of "PlusTech" at all. If you look closely at the photo's of the machine and the video you'll notice they look 'artificial' -- a little too clean and crisp compared with the background. Also, if you're going to video your state-of-the-art vehicle wouldn't you get a better location for your camera than back behind a boat-load of trees and bushes? Funny how the web site is unfinished (i.e. the boaring elements to fake up havn't been done -- but the fun graphics have). Well executed mind-you, but someone should tell the guys (or gals) who did this that it's "April 1" they should have been shooting for, not "August 1"

    --
    Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
    1. Re:Good hoax - but no cigar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate get you diappointed, but those machines is a real thing, no hoax. Because I was seen that machine a farmers booth a summer 2001.

    2. Re:Good hoax - but no cigar by bogomipe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sorry to spoil your fun, but the project has been popping up in Finnish media for several years now. The company developing the beast was bought up by John Deere some time ago.. maybe the integration of the companies and websites is a bit behind schedule?

      --
      - mipe -
  68. too slow by MrCreosote · · Score: 2

    I want to see them make one that can go as fast as a Zoid.

    With weapons to match.

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  69. Like This? by ashitaka · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    1. Re:Like This? by cHiphead · · Score: 0

      Very rarely am I as terrified by links in slashdot comments.. you sir have succeded where others failed.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Like This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does a Childerns Cartoon Movie scare you?
      The Neko-Bus is from the Studio Ghibli Film "My Neighbor Totoro"
      More information and news about other fin Japanese animated Films from studio Ghibli can be found at
      www.nausicaa.net

    3. Re:Like This? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Here's a life size version that a friend and some of his associates made for burning man. I believe they built it on an old used van they bought.

  70. I knew it... by Ironpoint · · Score: 0, Troll



    I knew it would happen. Someday big corporations would gain the strength they need to crush the forests. Huge behemoths would walk the forests leaving a swath of destruction with their mechanized chainsaws and huge claws. The stench of diesel fuel would replace the sweets smell of pine.

    I knew...

    Someday they would come to Fern Gulley, and all that could stop them was a 4 inch man and a bunch of HOT pixies.

  71. AT-AT made me think star wars, but by Archfeld · · Score: 3

    the actual pictures make me think Terminator, one of these coming out of the foggy woods, on a hunting day....hilarity is bound to ensue :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  72. One Step Closer to Mechwarrior... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Funny

    If anybody has read anything about the history of the Battletech universe, WorkMechs, the predecessors to BattleMechs, were developed in the 21st century. Only 900 years until total Mechwarrior happiness!

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
  73. Re:Any Gnomes involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO, NO NO!! *This* is how to do a PROPER /. "how-to":

    1. John Deere forestry machine
    2 AT-ST
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

  74. What About the Steeper Slopes?? by sexecutioner · · Score: 3, Informative

    Look, in Tasmania the forestry industry is pretty fucked for lots of reasons. Yet "they" still come out with the same crap that you've just spouted. Chain logging may reduce the impact on the soil due to wheeled and tracked vehicles. However, it also means that the idiots can also log some of the steepest slopes, that is those that they would have never been able to log before. They (the logging companies) don't give a rats ass about the ecological implications of what they are doing, they are simply trying to subdue the public (and Government in many cases) long enough for them to screw us all over. I only feel a bit churned up over this because in Tasmania we have 400 year old 70+ metre tall Eucalyptus Regnums (the tallest hardwoods in the world) being sold for chips at just over AU$1000 a pop - it makes me sick

    1. Re:What About the Steeper Slopes?? by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as a slope so steep that it couldn't be logged. In Oregon, greater than 95% of the forests have been logged at least once, probably better than half has been logged twice. Since the trees live where the mountains live, slopes exceeding a 60% grade have been logged. In fact, a steep slope is easier to log. Start at the bottom and work your way up letting the logs roll or slide down the hill, causing a lot of damage (or use the cable system now). Hell we did lots of that using nothing more technologically advanced than mule teams. Should a 60% slope be logged? Of course not; about ten years later the roots will have rotted out and the hillside comes down with the next big rain. That's where intelligent regulation comes in. If you don't want your 400+ year old trees logged for peanuts, write your Congressman or whatever the down-under equivalent is. Start those petitions, agitate, hell sit in trees if necessary. Just don't gripe about the technological advances that may improve logging for people and ma nature because they just aren't to blame and won't let us log anything new.

  75. It's the New Millennium humvee! by Gray · · Score: 2

    I'm sold, do they have any color other then Deer Green?

  76. Damn! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    I just about dropped my Jedi training ball when I read that!

  77. HOLY CRUD by Maverick+TimeSurfer · · Score: 1

    By Eru! That has got to be the coolest vehicle I've ever seen! How come that doesn't get much publicity? I didn't think any commercial/industrial grade walking vehicles existed! Flippin' Dustpuppies, you bet Thinkgeek should carry these!

    --
    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
  78. It's... it's... it's... by happyclam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IT'S A GIANT COOTIE!

    Seriously, remember the game "Cootie" when you were kids? (Those of you who aren't kids anymore anyway.)

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:It's... it's... it's... by bungo · · Score: 1

      Seriously, remember the game "Cootie" when you were kids? (Those of you who aren't kids anymore anyway.)


      Or... we're not from the US and therefore didn't share the same sort of childhood experiences as you.

      Since you've been modded up to +4 (at the time I'm writing this), would you mind explaining to those of us who don't understand you, exactly what you're talking about?

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    2. Re:It's... it's... it's... by happyclam · · Score: 2
      Or... we're not from the US and therefore didn't share the same sort of childhood experiences as you... would you mind explaining to those of us who don't understand you, exactly what you're talking about?

      Sorry, I figured "Cootie" must already have been in every country in every language since it was so ubiquitous when I was five years old... or at least it seemed that way when I was five.

      Try these:
      YesterdayLand Toys, with pictures
      Instructions for the game
      and Milton Bradley's product page.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  79. Quite old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As anyone who read the article knows, this isn't a new new invention nor is it made by John Deere company.

    The sig-legged bugger was originally designed at Helsinki University of Technology (at which I am conincidentally studying ;)) and later a small company (Plustech I think) was formed to continue the project.

    This beast is really a interesting product, but I've heard that no customer wants to be the first to use for real-life logging and pay for the huge development costs...

  80. Speed control? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

    So just how is that trottle lever marked?
    -- Walk --
    -- Trot --
    --Canter--
    --Gallop--

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  81. slow and loud for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    These walking machines are great for reducing damage while logging by reducing the need for road building and reducing the tracks they make on the ground.

    All present walking machines share one big problem though, they are inefficient. This one needs a big diesel to generate constant hydraulic pressure, most of which is used just to keep it standing. Hardly any is left to propel the machine forward.

    Animals typically use almost no energy to stand, and get most of their locomotion energy back through tendons etc.

    Another problem is that bugs fall a lot. The six legged gait is not particularly stable at speed. Fast bugs switch from six to four leg gait when they speed up, and even two leg gait for sprints.

    So this machine is stuck with the dead-slow one-at-a-time gait or the tippy six leg tripod gait, which is still pretty slow, and it has to have a big ass engine because of the inherent inefficiency.

    I guess JD figures all of the above are worth it to silence the whining Greenies who cry over every tree. I'd say this year's fires are a pretty good argument in that direction. I expect to see a bunch of these things running up and down in the next few years, thinning the over grown bush.

    Hope this works out for JD, as in a few years these things will hit the used equipment market. Then we can hot rod 'em!

  82. maybe... by pixitha · · Score: 1

    If it was a lil bit quieter...and a lil faster it would be awesome for scaring the crap outta ppl.... put some lights or neon flow strips or something on the legs... i can just see it now...... wee!!!

    --
    "an eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind"
  83. Can It Plant Faster Than It Cuts? by Kensor · · Score: 0

    For several millennia humans have consumed longer-lived trees and forest habitat at higher rates than they have been replaced. Forest resources may be able to be renewed, but they are not being renewed at sufficiently high rates to stop or reverse their age-old consumption rates. Civilization generally, and advanced society in particular, is so dependent upon various levels of technology that are not well-integrated with nature that it seems unlikely that the biosphere can continue indefinitely to support humankind without more human concern for biospheric stability and continuity. The question of the next few millennia may be whether or not humankind can learn how to put the essence of humanity into some reproducible non-biological form before the biosphere is no longer able to support biological human habitation. Whether or not it would be easier, in the long run, to plant trees, create forest habitat, and live as humans in better harmony with the terran biosphere than to attempt to embed some subset of human characteristics into non-traditional materials in order to be able to live in radically altered terran or non-terran environments is a moot question if humans continue to resist living in sustainable harmony upon the only planet we are sure can sustain us.

    1. Re:Can It Plant Faster Than It Cuts? by infie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I wonder what the 'terran biosphere' thought about the millions of acres of unmanaged 'pristine' forest that burnt to cinder in Utah... Maybe that was Earth Mother Gaia's reward to us living more 'well-integrated' in 'better harmony.' Or maybe she was giving us a lesson in how to 'consume longer-lived trees and forest habitat at higher rates'.

  84. Forestry has been subsidised for years by Howzer · · Score: 2
    It's NEVER profitable on its own.

    Why doesn't the government pull the money out and then we can all go straight to growing hemp for all our pulp needs?

    And you could use the zero THC varieties, so don't go crazy with the "evil weed" bullshit, ok?

    1. Re:Forestry has been subsidised for years by j-beda · · Score: 2

      It is a challenge to get dimensional lumber out of hemp however. The steel instustry might be happy with going to steel framing systems, but most housing in the USA and Canada is still built with lumber.

    2. Re:Forestry has been subsidised for years by Howzer · · Score: 2
      >It is a challenge to get dimensional lumber out of hemp however

      And so that's what you use timber for. I didn't say (actually, no-one is saying) never cut down trees, but cutting down old growth for pulp is just idiotic, when there are better, cheaper, cleaner alternatives, triply so if the government has to prop it up with my money!

      And of course, that's what is happening. Using plantation timber for lumber? Go right ahead. Great use of resources.

  85. Re: mode by freaq · · Score: 1

    i've always thought of HTML as

    <foo> <!--this is where foo begins >
    this sidebar is foo'd
    </foo> <!--this is where foo ends >

    so, should i take a real course or is my conceptualization too far removed from reality to benefit from guidance?

    --
    united states nuclear device terrorist bioweapon encryption cocaine korea syria iran iraq columbia cuba
  86. Re:Where are the wacko's complaining about defores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry. In Finland (the originating country of that contraption) we have at least three million and three trees.

    I'd like to have one of those for our summer hideout. Just to get those damn firs out of our otherwise nice forests.

    Seriously, I do not think that deforestation is not that serious of a problem, at least in temperate areas. If Americans and Canadias manage somehow to hack down every tree in the subcontinent: do not worry, there's plenty in Russia. And they probably wouldn't mind selling it for dollars. (Or even notice, in case one went in with a C-130 on a out-of-the-way abandoned airfield).

  87. Goblin Shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the heck are the night elves when you don't expect them?

  88. Draft horses by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2
    The tool depends on the task.

    In some areas it might make sense to consider draft horses and sledges and drag the trees to the nearest road. They're probably cheaper to operate and less impact on the terrain. Certain types of soft terrain or areas where you may not build roads are examples. If the cutting is done when the ground is frozen, movement is easier. Adding modern materials or design (tracks?) to the sledge could reduce the number of draft horses used.

    Six legged walking machines definitely have a hi-tech coolness, but are a young technology. Four legged walking machines have been refined by us for thousands of years for the specific task of dragging heavy things.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  89. Shouldn't that have been .. by AftanGustur · · Score: 2

    With regard of Yesterday's news a better title might have been:

    Talibans: AT-ATs are Coming to a cave Near *!You!*

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  90. Looks legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was able to get to the site using links from www.deere.com through www.timberjack.com

    http://www.deere.com/en_US/cfd/construction/deer e_ const/docs1/affiliated_companies.html?sidenavstate =00001

    http://www.timberjack.com/development/concept-de ve lopment.htm

  91. And they said computers would be the paperless era by Soporific · · Score: 1

    So they made a machine that would replace .5 humans traditionally sawing a Weyerhauser Weed and let it roll down the mountain. The vehicle is something I'd like to use to take to the bar, but it didn't seem like it was anything that would revolutionize the logging industry. Humans are built perfectly to chop lumber at an extreme angle.

    ~S

  92. Re: mode by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    It's like the paragraph tag. Your browser shouldn't complain if you close a paragraph you never officially opened (like this one).

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  93. I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK by wheany · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always wanted to be... a LUMBERJACK!

    Leaping from tree to tree, as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia! The larch! The redwood! The mighty Scotch pine! With me
    best girl by me side, as we sing, sing sing!

    Oh, I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I sleep all night and I work all day.

    (He's a lumberjack and he's OK, he sleeps all night and he works all day.)

    I cut down trees, I eat my lunch, I go to the lava'try, On Wednesdays I go shopping, and have buttered scones for tea.

    (He cuts down trees, he eats his lunch, he goes to the lava'try, On Wednesdays he goes shopping, and has buttered scones for tea.)

    I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I sleep all night and I work all day

    I cut down trees, I skip and jump, I like to press wildflow'rs, I put on women's clothing, and hang around in bars.

    (He cuts down trees, he skips and jumps, he likes to press wildflow'rs, He puts on women's clothing... and hangs around in BARS?!?!)

    I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK,
    I sleep all night and I work all day

    I cut down trees, I wear high heels, suspenders and a bra I wish I'd been a girlie, just like my dear Pappa!

    (He cuts down trees, he wears high heels... suspenders and a BRA?!?!)

    Oh I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I sleep all night and I work all day Yes I'm a lumberjack and I'm O-K... I sleep all night and I work all day!

  94. Not a good idea by ciryon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone could easily disable it by flying an aircraft with wire around its legs!

    Ciryon

  95. Cabin Motion and Seasickness by clickety6 · · Score: 1


    It's a bit hard to tell from the videos, but it looks as if the cabin moves around a bit as the legs walk. I wonbder how this compares to driving a caterpillar-tracked vechile over the terrain? Would the cabin movement be more prone to induce "sea-sickness" motion effects?

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  96. Indeed, old news from Finland ;) by korpiq · · Score: 2

    Instantly when seeing the vehicle I noticed it was the same that made the news here years back. Glad to see it's making progress.

    Can't wait to have the "civilian" version: never mind parking problems - just step over 'em!

    Finland, Finland, Finland; the place I want to be
    freezing, drunken, paid and prized for innovative anarchy

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
  97. AT-AT modeled after elephant by wlevin · · Score: 1

    In the Star Wars: Magic of Myth exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum of Art, I learned that the AT-AT's gate was modeled after that of an elephant. And distorted elephant noises mixed with slick highway traffic sounds were used to create the TIE Fighter sound effects.

    --

    --
    http://www.macboy.com
    Cartoons for Mac Geeks
    1. Re:AT-AT modeled after elephant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > gate

      No, "gait". No wonder your post was confoozing at first.

  98. Fast on Endor... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    If you want to go faster through the woods you could still use the imperial speeder-bikes, right?

    1. Re:Fast on Endor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer these babies

  99. Won an award already in 1996 by bogomipe · · Score: 1
    The walking beast developed by Plustech in Finland won an environmental award already in 1996 and has been popping up in the local media steadily.

    --
    - mipe -
  100. AT-MT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A believe in one of the books (the Timothy Zahn trilogy), there was mention of a six legged AT-MT walker developed for mountainous terrain.

    *NERD!!!*

  101. Re:One Step Closer to Mechwarrior... OR Labors by BRSloth · · Score: 1

    Oh, how much time until I can drive my Patlabor? I just can't wait!

    Cryogenics NOW!

  102. I speak for the trees by frenchgates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I realize that the purpose of this device is to lessen the impact of vehicles on the forest, which is great, but is anyone else freaked out by its resemblance to the rapid forest destroying machines in Dr. Seuss's "The Lorax"? Maybe Hollywood can make a live action version now.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  103. Question by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    Is a logging company paying you to post in forums?

    1. Re:Question by Helter · · Score: 0

      No, I've just grown up my whole life with logging on part of my families ground. People give loggers a hard time out of ignorance. If they actually knew the first thing about logging they'd realize that it isn't neccesarily bad, and that the vast majority of the loggers out there are actually doing a service to the forests that they work in (even WITH the roads that they have to cut). I have no personal interesting in the logging industry (my family lost the land a long time ago after the controlling generation died off).

  104. It always amazes me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but if this machine costs too much to opperate, it won't sell. Margins are EXTREMELY important to logging companies."

    Really now, you think John Deere might have some concept of how much they can expect to sell logging equipment to logging companies for? Is it really too much to think that they just might have actually considered that when they designed the frigging thing?

    These companies really are lucky to have Slashdot Geeks here to catch their mistakes. I'm sure they're extremely grateful to you, for pointing out that they have to be careful how they price it or they might not sell any.

    Thank you, Captain Fucking Obvious.

  105. More SF becoming reality by ab762 · · Score: 1

    Dean Ing wrote about a similar machine in his 1976 story Malf

    It's a good man-machine interface story, if you can hunt it up. No spoilers :-)

  106. Needs... by aardwulf · · Score: 1

    a level 4 turbo or something. yea, parking it is a bitch, but damn, come on...at least get me there quickly...

    reminds me of the scene in office space where the old man w/ the walker is kicking all the traffic's ass. i would put $5 on the old man vs. that thing..

  107. Build your own... by aardwulf · · Score: 1

    These are fun...made w/ muscle wire... nitinol

  108. Re: Equations as profanity by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 1

    how about incomprehensible equations?

    Works for me! When I get upset, I tend to yell "Tangent of 90!!!"

    --
    3. Profit!
    2. ???
    1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  109. OK, that's disturbing.

    A giant cat with an internal carrying capacity?

    That's as sick as gigantic, long-legged insects with their carapace hollowed out, and...

    Uh, never mind.

    --
    3. Profit!
    2. ???
    1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  110. On memepool a week ago... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    Is Slashdot now just a memepool retread?

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  111. another application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wonder if they've considered a version of this vehicle for fighting forest fires?

  112. Um... Memepool ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez- now I just have to read one site a day

  113. AT-AT: Bah! What's REALLY cool is... by jbarr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...the cutter mechanism on the end of it's boom. That is REALLY cool. I saw a show on TLC (I think it was Modern Marvels or something) that showed how this cutting head works. It grabs onto a tree trunk, cuts it off, rolls the length of the trunk stripping off the branches, and then rolls back over the trunk cutting it into pre-determined lengths. It estimates these lengths by determinig the tree's length by using the tree's diameter and stored "tree data" based on tree type. Seeing this thing in action leaves your eyes glued to the TV and your jaw glued to the floor!!!

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  114. Over Macho Grande? (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:Over Macho Grande? (n/t) by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'll ever be over Macho Grande....

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  115. It's gotta be said... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing perambulates like a Deere...

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  116. Definately not off topic... by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 1

    This is very geek. It is an engineering masterpiece. MechE's around the world are rejoicing.

    --

    -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

  117. The Hills? by IPFreely · · Score: 2
    if I saw one of these things comming at me, I'd run for the hills!

    The Hills? NONONONONO! That's where they are most effective. You need to run to the flat wide open spaces. That way you could out run and out manouver it on your trusty tricycle.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  118. more like a AT-TE by Henriok · · Score: 1

    It's more like the AT-TE witch can be seen battling the Trade Federation on the ground on Geonosis in Attack of the Clones. AT-TE even got three legs!

    http://www.starwars.com/databank/vehicle/atte/in de x.html

    --

    - Henrik

    - when the Shadows descend -
  119. uh... Whoa? by CthulhuTequila · · Score: 1

    Okay... yeah... this thing just eats trees for breakfast. I'm pretty sure someone could put one of these to good use on a battlefield, but forget guns man. Just convince this Tree Mech here that those Taliban guys are just really funny looking trees (eg). Seriously, I'm sure that it could be set up for some serious combat, but until we get into fighting in rough terrain (Forest, really rocky areas, maybe Jungles... but that might be a stretch), this big guy just isn't going to be very helpful. Except of course as an intimidation thing. You know, you've got a gun, you've got tanks backing you up. But they've got a giant metal spider walking towards you with a really big gun aimed at you. Just don't tell them how much better the tanks that are following it are in this terrain. Laters

  120. AT-AT? by p4n1c88 · · Score: 1

    I think it's more like an AT-PT. Still damn friggin' cool.

    --
    -------
    People are great... When they don't come near me.
  121. Walkers need close-quarter arms by maddogsparky · · Score: 2
    Walking battle platforms need close-quarter arms, in addition to the mid-range and long range armements that they have been depicted with in existing movies/games. Flaws that easily restrict movement have been available as a plot forwarding device to give the little guy a chance to stand up to the behemoth. In Star Wars, entanglement devices were used. In the original Mech Warrior, if the smallest mechs could get in close enough, the main armements of the giants couldn't aim low enough to hit them.

    If the walkers in Star Wars were equipped with close weapons, they would have a) been able to dispatch the Ewoks/rebels that cast the nets or set the triplines and b) been able to destroy the entaglement device. In Mech Warrior, close quarter armements would have been able to hit mechs that were below the range of the main weapons, eliminating the "save zone"

    A real-world waling weapons platform would be able to use a rapid-fire projectile weapon to the same effect. Small belly-mounted turrets would be able to fill this niche.

    --
    science is a religion
  122. Riiiight... by tgd · · Score: 2

    Like any Slashdot readers go hiking. That means actually going outside and being with Nature!

  123. Uhh, no, it's not possible by DG · · Score: 2

    Modern tank main guns, when used in the anti-armour role, don't use an explosive projectile. Instead, they fire a dart of dense metal (like tungsten or depleted uranium) at very high velocities. The pure kinetic energy drives the penetrator through the armour, and the sudden pressure rise within the fighting compartment superheats the air inside, killing the crew and (usually) cooking off any ammo inside the turret in a secondary explosion.

    The muzzle velocity of these projectiles ranges from 1400 m/s to 1800 m/s.

    Typical engagement ranges in open country extend from 5000m at the very outside, down to about 1000m Ranges in close country are correspondingly closer.

    That means in the best possible case (a 5000m engagement in open country) you will have roughly 3 seconds to realize you have been fired upon, attempt evasive action, and get the vehicle clear of the space that will be occupied by the penetrator.

    At more typical ranges, you have 1 second to accomplish same.

    Not going to happen. Sorry.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    1. Re:Uhh, no, it's not possible by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      Can you say "Jump"? Remember, these are new capabilities. If an unmanned/remotely operated tank could just jump to the side, or plain upwards, it MIGHT be possible to dodge a significant percentage of incoming shells.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

  124. Re:Where are the wacko's complaining about defores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly people like him can not see the Forest for the Trees.

  125. Gun platform stability and ground pressure by DG · · Score: 2

    There's two more disadvantages to consider - gun platform stability, and ground pressure.

    A legged vehicle is probably pretty stable while stationary, but what happens if you fire a 125mm main gun while walking, with legs up in the air?

    The other consideration is ground pressure. Tanks weigh between 40 and 70 tons. They spread all that weight over the large surface area of the tracks, and get the ground pressure down to a more reasonable level. What happens if you move from the high-surface-area tracks to 6 low-surface-area legs, especially in muddy or soft terrain?

    Kinda embarrassing to get your AT-AT stuck in the mud....

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  126. Re: mode by j-beda · · Score: 2

    I think you missinterpret. I think that the paragraph tag is an opening tag which should use a closing tag with a slash, but most browsers will not complain if you never close it.

  127. Re: Equations as profanity by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    my father has long substituted "square root" for "fuck all". Not an equation per se, but in same ball park.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  128. Elephants are a better solution for green logging by patiwat · · Score: 1

    Back in the old days, the great teak wood forests of Northern Thailand were logged using elephants. Very nimble, incredibly strong, elephants could drag giant logs across the worst of terrain, with minimal damage to the ground or to the surrounding ecosystem. Sure they left around large piles of manure, but that at least helped fertilize the soil.

    Then American-style mechanized logging came in, the great forests were indiscriminantly clear cut, and the elephants were replaced with 10-wheeled trucks. The elephants and their mahout masters were left unemployed, and now roam Bangkok, beggers, to be hit by cars and gawked at by tourists.

    I admire this mechanized logger as a good way to log with less damage to the forests, but aren't we developing technology where environmentally friendly four-legged solutions already exist?

    Patiwat Panurach
    patiwat@sloan.mit.edu

  129. No problems here, mate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 38" penis!

  130. Your ideas intrigue me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    So what do you estimate a cargo plane load of hardwood logs would fetch on the open market? I would assume that Japan would be where to get top dollar, da?

  131. E2 links... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it works for the [story], but not in the replies, right?

  132. BattleTech meets reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is kind of funny-- In the war game/novels/cartoon/Video Game BattleTech, they attribute the battlemechs conception to robots just like this used in Mining and construction. :)

    Maybe someday I'll finally be able to buy myself a Locust. :)

  133. Re: mode by susano_otter · · Score: 2

    I've noticed that my browser does not complain when I close paragraphs that I never explicitly opened (like this one).

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  134. Ewoks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long until the Ewoks start battling the Empireal forces?

  135. Oh Boy! by thefluxster · · Score: 1

    Oh GOOD! Finnaly, a machine that can cut down 1 tree per hour! Just what we need! And to think, it only cost millions of dollars in researching and developing. Ah, the marvels of modern technology. We've got a speed demon on our hands here - fire the cutting crews and buy a dozen of those babies. What? We don't have enough money and our revenues would go down the drain?! WHO CARES! It's new and "improved"! We've GOT TO BUY IT!!! (sheesh)

    --

    Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.

  136. How many gaits? by lamz · · Score: 2

    That's one of the coolest machines I've seen in a while. The videos show two gaits: Going down the hill, it moves one leg at a time -- walking. On flat land, it moves three legs at a time, always keeping a tripod on the ground -- trotting. I wonder if it has any other gaits? Galloping would be something to see...

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  137. Fluidity of Motion by TheHouseMouse · · Score: 1

    I saw a very similar machine on a tv logging special a while back. And while you would assume that the 'AT-AT' would be a very stiff and rigid machine, it wasn't. To view video of it (and i'll once again point out, it wasn't the same machine) in hi-res @ 30fps was stunning. The arm just seemed to have a life of it's own as it wildly swept in to grasp, trim, and cut it's next victim. It by no means seemed precise in it's movements, but the randomness and looseness it had really gave it charm. I know it seems out to talk to passionantly about a logger, but it was just crazy.

    --
    Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.
  138. Enviro-Warriors vs. Beetle-bot by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    Where are the wacko's complaining about deforestation? Our "dwinding" tree supply is almost run out here in America!

    The tree people are not complaining because they (understandably) are scared to death of the evil walking insectile death-robots that the foresters now possess .

    We are helpless to resist their untippable tripod-balanced might.
  139. Oh Joy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A more efficient weapon to finally destroy what forests we have left. Any doubters remaining, try flying form L.A. to Portland or Seattle sometime and look at all the bare patches out the window.

    1. Re:Oh Joy.. by cramped+bowels · · Score: 1

      It's this, not the Spotted Owl whats putting the lumberjack out of work. Nothing left to but to put on women's clothing.

  140. Lethal Looking? Re:Not at all by pauly_thumbs · · Score: 1

    The only thing lethal about it is that the operator's sillouette is available for all with an AK47 to sight in on. If you ever talk to any engineers who have worked in a combat zone a common complaint about heavy machinery is that sometimes the operator is a perfect target, often an experienced combat heavy machinery operator will choose a crappier machine for the job if it makes them less of a target. If someone can see your sillouette .. they'll take a shot at you.... especially if you owe them money.

    The best defense sometimes in combat is a good shovel.

  141. It has to be slow.... by rhombic · · Score: 1

    Otherwise there wouldn't be time for the dramatic snowfield battle, they'd just walk up and blow the generators.

    --
    1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
  142. From the horse's mouth. by Kobal · · Score: 1

    As a forester, I can call that toy work-related, so I'll have a shot (12 gauge - not!) at it. Though it may look like a tech leap, it's not much more than the last evolution of the "spider" wlaking excavators (4 fulcrums, 2 wheels, 2 articulated arms) that have been around since the 60s. It sure may go on harsher slopes than tracked and wheeled ones but it's only a harvester, which means you still have to get skidders and loaders on the field, or get the logs evacuated by cable or throwing (don't do this at home.) I don't think this system will be stable enough for a skidder anytime soon. Actually, I'm not sure it could even be used with the heavier harvesting heads, hence limiting its usefulness to small softwood. That's ok as long as there's a market with large scale mining-like logging operations, but hat won't last for long, as it's already being abandoned for most of the tropical logging, and Northern America won't be able to sustain it much further either. That you need to keep some degree of forest cover to avoid turning the slopes to badlands defeats its purpose. And ecocertification is becoming a must have to sell the logs and derivative products, which will make clear cuts less frequent... On the other hand, it can come handy on rough, uneven land. Armour was mentioned earlier. Most of the thick steel plating is underside to limit damage from stumps, rocks and unexploded canon and mortar shells. The best destination I could think of to this system is a multipurpose tractor for stump shredding, soil preparation and planting in small mountains areas to limit soil erosion. I'm not expecting anything like that from John Deere, as they mainly make ultra-specialized tools (harvesters and feller-bunchers for that one, I guess), but another manufacturer may do it. Of course, you'd still probably do better with a walking excavator most of the time. A distant second best use would be on WW I and II battlefields, though this case is in unheard of in the USA. All in all, this probably won't be much more than some offside experiment for the marketing guys to tout around, not the logging mainstream. Yet, I have to agree it would indeed look good on a parking lot.

  143. We're coming in from the North, below their radar by whuppy · · Score: 1

    "When will you be back?"
    "I can't tell you that. It's classified."

    --
    whuppy enjoys smelling like diesel fuel
  144. you got me wrong by lingqi · · Score: 2
    1) modern armor is *quite* capable of stopping inert projectiles. see here about M1A1/2 op notes:

    excerpt:
    Protection -- According to the Army report, 8 Abrams crews reported being hit by fire from the Iraqi T-72 , but there was no damage. Later reports claimed that 100-mm rounds fired by T-55 tanks simply glanced off. 125-mm rounds from the T-72 dented the M1A1's armor, but did not penetrate. Of the over 1,950 M1s and M1A1 tanks in the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations (KTO), only four suffered catastrophic damage and four were damaged but repairable, the Army report stated. Later analysis revealed that of the four that caught fire, three were hit erroneously by US AGM-114 Hellfire missiles. No crewmen were injured because the bustle doors and blow- off panels worked as designed to vent the explosions upward.

    please note that US army post a more serious threat to itself than any enemy shells, due to the advances in armor technology

    2) a tracked tank makes an easy (easier) target because you have *zero* lateral movement. a tank's position can be predicted with reasonable accuracy and simplicity. add side-back movement, however, aiming becomes much more of a pain in the ass. that's why you run zig-zag to lessen your chance of being hit by bullets (if you are a lowly infantry unit).

    3) one other reason for legs is the ability (i am not sure on this as per the current state of technology, but hopefully this is something they would strive for) -- sudden and fast acceleration. the time for you (as a person) to run, stop, hop sideways, etc is minimal compared to if you wan to do similar things with the best of tanks. hence making the dodges (if you are concerned about those still) possible.

    i firmly believe that legged battle vehicles will be the future; i could be wrong, of course. but in my view there are simply too many benefits to pass up by sticking with current sort of technology.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  145. Predicted by an SF writer in 1976... by alispguru · · Score: 2

    Dean Ing wrote a short story called "Malf" in which he describes a legged vehicle designed for logging. One of the walkers gets stolen by a Mafia-linked guy who uses it to rob a bank (!) and the good guys have to chase it down with another walker.

    The story isn't online anywhere, but it can be found here.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  146. Elephant by Mittermeyer · · Score: 2

    There is already a bioengineered solution to this problem- it's called an elephant.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  147. Cutting Trees by airship · · Score: 1

    You should see one of these things cutting trees. The arm grabs the trunk, auto-locates at the selected stump height, cuts the tree like butter, and immediately strips all the branches. It's impressive.
    Working at Deere is cool. We get to play with all the cool "big boy" toys. :)

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  148. FASTER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanna see that thing sprint!

  149. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine parking this puppy at the mall

    Forget that! Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

  150. Re:BETTER LATE THAN NEVER by DaCrusierI · · Score: 0

    Yea, I know what trolling is. I'm not new to the 'net world ... either way, this is tasteless and pointless ... I ignore a bunch of troll, but this one I could not hold back

  151. yeah looks like a Super-Axe-Hacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh huh, it looks almost just like a Super-Axe-Hacker

  152. Thunderbirds are go! by jrcollins2 · · Score: 1

    Reality is finally catching up with the classic Thunderbirds TV show.

    Separated at birth?
    http://pioneer.crc.paragould.ar.us/~adam/f ab/TB/si dewinder.jpg

  153. looks more like an AT-PT by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    My God I'm so sad that I know what that is.....

  154. No, you're just wrong by DG · · Score: 2

    Keep in mind that I'm a retired tank troop commander, so I sorta know what I'm talking about.

    1) Modern armour can stop APFSDS rounds

    Under the right circumstances, yes, but consider what the "right circumstances" are.

    Firstly, any data from the Gulf war vs American tanks is data that describes second or third line equipment vs state of the art equipment. In case you didn't know, the digits in the designation of Soviet-era equipment represent the year it was first identified by NATO - so a T55 was first encountered in *1955* and a T-72 in *1972*

    Related to this is that the Soviets never sold their top-line equipment to client states. They kept the good stuff for themselves, and sold derated stuff to customers.

    Secondly, the price of all that armour protection is a great deal of mass. While the exact composition of the M1's armour is still top secret, it is known to have at least one layer of depleted uranium in it (the same stuff used in the penetrator) It also has a bunch of ceramics to defend against HEAT warheads, and an anti-spall layer to help the crew.

    On a legged vehicle, you have to not only move this mass forward, you have to LIFT it too.

    On a tracked vehicle, the tank rolls over its tracks much like a train. There is suprisingly little friction there - ask anyone who ever made the mistake of trying to change both tracks at once, and had the tank roll away from them.

    The idea of 65 tons JUMPING straight up in the air is just ludicrous. Work out how much energy that would take! And then work out the ground pressure when it lands, and figure out how far it'll be driven into the soil.

    2) Tanks are very much more manouverable than you seem to realize. They can spin in place at very high speeds, and then squirt out in unexpected directions. The first time you actually see a tank in motion, it'll scare the crap out of you. These are not giant lumbering monsters, they are 65 ton sportscars.

    3) Even if you somehow manage to find a power source that could drive a legged vehicle, even if you can solve the ground pressure problem, you still have to deal with the fact that you're still completely dependant on crew reaction time to recognise you're being shot at, assess the incoming tradjectory, and then make an appropriate evasive action. The incoming round is supersonic, so no help there. Radar and other active sensors give away your position, so that's no good. You're down to the Mark I eyeball picking up the muzzle blast... and at an average of 1 second from firing to impact, you'd have a better chance at dodging a bullet.

    Not gonna happen.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  155. Government's by sexecutioner · · Score: 1

    In tasmania there is quite a solid and well established greens movement that has had a string of major wins (and losses) over the past few decades. And yes, I've gone and sat in trees and spoken at ralleys and written to the government. But the logging is so strongly entrenched with the government that it's a complex social and political problem - as it is everywhere no doubt. Anyways, the news is somewhat good as we just had an election and the greens party went from 1 seat to four (out of 25) so the battle shall continue.