Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Runs X, KDE, Gnome, StarOffice and Tuxracer

freax writes "Today in the the xbox-linux mailinglist: I'm typing this into KMail using a USB keybaord (and a USB mouse) in front of the TV connected to the Xbox. ... and even StarOffice works quite fine. TuxRacer also runs (look at the new screenhots on the website), but only with one frame per second. Check out screenshots here."

307 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Can you run Wine? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    So the question now is whether you can run the X-Box emulator on the result.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Can you run Wine? by Indras · · Score: 4, Funny

      So the question now is whether you can run the X-Box emulator on the result.

      And if you can, will it be faster than the original, because of the OS upgrade? ::grins::

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    2. Re:Can you run Wine? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1, Informative

      The processor doesn't need to be emulated, but the API's can. Think wine.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    3. Re:Can you run Wine? by HeUnique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And here's the REALLY scary part! if you buy an XBox today, most chances that even if you manage to install some mod chip - the xbox-linux won't run on it. MS changed chips and code based on the analysis of the MIT hacker...

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    4. Re:Can you run Wine? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Not at the moment. However, CXBX is a work-in-progress. Some relevant portions from the page:
      How hard is it to create an emulator for the XBox? Unlike the other major new next generation consoles I think the XBox will probably be the easiest to emulate. The architecture and operating system of the XBox so much resemble a Windows PC that it may be possible to simply convert XBox games to Windows. That is, replacing the system calls of XBox applications (the games) with substitutes when emulating it. This may seem hard and impossible to do (converting executables to work on other, but similar operating systems for similar architectures), but in fact it has already been done before: Project Odin allows Windows applications such as Quake 3 or Starcraft for example, to be run on IBM's OS/2 Warp.
      CXBX replaces system calls in XBox boxes (a Microsoft term for application) with Win32 API system calls, allowing for direct execution of the box. However, some system calls still need to be replaced by hand. But of course, who needs to emulate an XBOX when you can emulate on an XBOX? (Thanks to Emulator Zone for this useful information I'm sure all readers will be interested in.)
      • MAME-X What do you mean, 70+ games for the XBox? Try over 3000! This is a port of MAME for the XBox which allows you to play tons of arcade classics on the XBox.
      • GNUboy Yes! The all time favorite handheld is here! This is the Xbox port of the Gameboy emulator.
      • Handy The Atari Lynx emulator has been ported to the box... If I could only fit it in my pocket...
      • Stella The known atari 2600 emulator has come to the xbox!
      • Daedalus The N64 emulator is progressing well on the Xbox too!
      • Snes9X That's right... SNES on the xbox!!! snes9x..only 12-x years late!
      • GBA-X GBA on the Xbox...
      • X-Nes NES on the xbox.
      • SMSPlus Master System/Game Gear emulator.
      • FCEU-NES NES emulator. known for accurate emulation of offensive language

      Hope this helps. Enjoy emulating on your box!

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    5. Re:Can you run Wine? by checkyoulater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How the fuck is this modded to +5 Funny?

      Because it is funny? Geez, don't be so sensitive...

      Maybe you should refrain from posting until you understand irony.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    6. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And how close is Bush to shutting down Bin Laden after a year?

      He's probably dead right now. Do you know for sure otherwise?

      This doesn't change the point that the Sudanese offered Bin Laden to Clinton three times and he turned them down each time!

      They begged for him to take Bin Laden, and Clinton did nothing, because it wasn't popular. That's Clinton's legacy. Nothing will change the fact that Bill Clinton is solely responsible for the worst terroist attack in American history.

      Go ahead, try to spin it. The truth remains.

    7. Re:Can you run Wine? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      How the fuck is this modded to +5 Funny?

      Yeah, it should have been +5 Insightful.

      Hey just what else are you going to do on a box that has a low end pentium and outputs only to a TV?

      It is a cool hack but at the end of the day you can get the same effect much more easily by adding a $60 TV out card to a PC. I just put together a PC upgrade with a new motherboard, processor, video card and memory for $350. So OK thats a tad more expensive than the $200 of an Xbox but the result is a heck of a lot more useful.

      And don't get me started on the 'cheap supercomputer' idea, no you can put as many Xboxen together as you like, you are not going to break any price performance barriers because the price/performance of your basic block is simply not cutting edge, even with Microsoft making a loss on every unit. Also whatever you gained in hardware savings would be rapidly lost through the cost of powering a farm of the damn things. If you want cutting edge price/performance get boxes that don't waste money on a disk, have a larger processor, more RAM and come with multiple LAN ports.

      So logically once you have the X-box running linux the next thing to do is run Wine and then the Xbox emulator. The Multics or Lisp machine emulators would also be pretty cool. Alternatively if someone could get a ZXSpectrum emulator up and running on it.

      As it stands this hack is pretty much like the fact my Zaurus runs Linux, kewl but completely irrelevant to why I have the device.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    8. Re:Can you run Wine? by warmcat · · Score: 2

      In fact there have been no reports of the new version of the xbox out in the wild yet. I think MS have warehouses full of the old ones to get rid of.

      I purchased a second one for routing/ printerserver duties last Friday, and it was manufactured in May 2002. So I think we're still pretty safe for a few weeks.

    9. Re:Can you run Wine? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Xbox is now £159 in the UK. This means I am getting something which can be used as a Linux box very inexpensively.

      Instead of having to pay a lot of money for a SOHO network server (broadband router/smtp/file server/firewall/etc) I can now pay £159 and let Microsoft subsidise the rest.

      Don't get me wrong, I wouldnt want an Xbox as my main workstation - the specs aren't powerful enough - but running Linux on an Xbox does have its uses.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    10. Re:Can you run Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just like all the creationist "truths" are trolls

    11. Re:Can you run Wine? by wheany · · Score: 2

      Or you could just go and buy the official Playstation 2 Linux kit. And you don't have to possibly ruin your console by installing a modchip...

      And the best part is (because we all know Microsoft is eeeeevil), you are not giving Microsoft (or in slash-speak: "Micro$oft") any money.

    12. Re:Can you run Wine? by Hrshgn · · Score: 1

      If you buy an XBOX, install Linux and never buy any XBOX games you are actually getting money from MS.

    13. Re:Can you run Wine? by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What? Do you honestly think when you go and buy an Xbox, the clerk behind the counter pushes a magic button, and an Xbox factory churns out just one Xbox that is delivered to you post haste?

      No.

      Microsoft has made (and paid for) hudreds of thousands of Xboxes beforehand, and have them sitting in a warehouse somewhere, waiting to be delivered to customers. They might actually be in a backroom of your local game-boutique, but anyway, Microsoft has already lost money making the consoles. What you are doing is giving them back some of that money. Think about it...

    14. Re:Can you run Wine? by sh00z · · Score: 1

      IANAA (I am not an accountant), but won't they be able to write off those unsold warehoused boxes on their Federal taxes at the end of the year? Better to buy one to make *sure* they lose money...

    15. Re:Can you run Wine? by wheany · · Score: 1

      So why do corporations lose money at all? They can always write off any losses on their taxes, right?

    16. Re:Can you run Wine? by kableh · · Score: 2

      Nothing will change the fact that Bill Clinton is solely responsible for the worst terroist attack in American history.

      Yea, I'm sure Reagan arming and training Al Qaeda has nothing to do with that. Or America's ass-backwards foreign policy for the past 30 years.

      Conservative assholes like you blasting Clinton for his past transgressions make me sick. Get over it. Try questioning the Federalist asshole you have respresenting your party now instead.

  2. Wahoo! by Jacer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have an X-box, and NO games, just the DVD kit. (I entered the taco bell challenge 600 times!!) Now I can do something other than play DVD's on it!

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:Wahoo! by cioxx · · Score: 3, Funny

      I entered the taco bell challenge 600 times!!

      I hope your ass exploded from all those burritos.

    2. Re:Wahoo! by Jacer · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      i just took a hand-ful of tickets each time i went there, which was every day because my friend (who doesn't have a car and works there) always needed me to pick him up

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    3. Re:Wahoo! by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I entered the taco bell challenge 600 times!!
      Your name wouldn't happen to be Lazlo Hollyfeld?
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:Wahoo! by Wizy · · Score: 1

      Real genius is the best movie of all time.

    5. Re:Wahoo! by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. :-)

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  3. Prize ? by kila_m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean someone will win get the $200,000 ?

    1. Re:Prize ? by *xpenguin* · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably only $100,000, because the second step of the project hasn't been completed (make it legal and have it run without a mod chip). It sure looks impossible to me.

    2. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that only way to do it is to find bug in Xbox BIOS (or whatever - but this will be surely fixed by MS) or brute-force decrypt CDs signing key so we'll be able to sign Linux CD as regular Xbox application.

    3. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh, did somebody say distributed processing? Come on then, talk about massive civil disobedience. Fucking come on then!

    4. Re:Prize ? by reverius · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but brute-force decryption doesn't sound legal (think DMCA). I think they keyword for the prize money was "legal" way of doing it.

    5. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but fuck DMCA! Here in Europe is it completely legal (at least now). World - USA != 0

    6. Re:Prize ? by Nameles · · Score: 1

      It makes me wonder if MS can legally enact DMCA on the XBOX, since it's an American item? Ignore the fact that it's made in Mexico and other such places. I doubt they can legally, but they will find a way to do it because America = world.

    7. Re:Prize ? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but fuck DMCA! Here in Europe is it completely legal (at least now).

      I hate to tell you this, but the EU is considering a DMCA type law of its own. The DMCA was brought about because of a WTO treaty that more or less required it. EU signed this treaty, too.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    8. Re:Prize ? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      There's nothing in DMCA that prohibits cracking a key that is used for signing.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    9. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

      There are moments when I love Czech republic not being in EU ;o)

    10. Re:Prize ? by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

      And that means what to a large team of lawyers?

    11. Re:Prize ? by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Surely the second method would violate the DMCA, and not qualify for the other half of the money (illegal)?

      The legality of the first might depend on what the bug was, I guess... Still I'm sure the legality or lack thereof won't frighten people, there's a roaring trade in PSX modchips despite their grey status.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    12. Re:Prize ? by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

      I don't see how it would violate DMCA IF you don't do it in USA (and maybe EU). If you take "final product", it is completely legal even when proces used for creating isn't legal in USA. It's like buying goods from state with lower legal working age.

    13. Re:Prize ? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      It means DMCA is about as useful to them as a city ordinance against having a dog bark loudly all night. They can bully outside the system, but if it ever comes before a judge, they lose. Even Kaplan's wackiness and corruption has limits, I suspect.

      I'm just a hopeless idealist, aren't I? ;-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    14. Re:Prize ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      To have a brute forced key would allow for signed applications to run on the platform. This would increase interoperability. There is an exception clause in the DMCA that allows for this.

      Please read the Act.

      Chapter 12
      Section 1201

      (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a)(1)(A), a person who has lawfully obtained the right to use a copy of a computer program may circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a particular portion of that program for the sole purpose of identifying and analyzing those elements of the program that are necessary to achieve interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, and that have not previously been readily available to the person engaging in the circumvention, to the extent any such acts of identification and analysis do not constitute infringement under this title.

      (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b), a person may develop and employ technological means to circumvent a technological measure, or to circumvent protection afforded by a technological measure, in order to enable the identification and analysis under paragraph (1), or for the purpose of enabling interoperability of an independently created computer program with other programs, if such means are necessary to achieve such interoperability, to the extent that doing so does not constitute infringement under this title.

    15. Re:Prize ? by kubrick · · Score: 2
      True -- I guess I assumed the prize donator specified US laws, but I'm not sure about that. The prize money is in US$.

      Still, give them ten years and the only places you will be able to do this will be China, North Korea et. al.

      Actually, part two specifies unsigned code must run without hardware mods; thus brute-forcing a key is not an option.

      From the site:

      Project B: Run unsigned code on an Xbox without any hardware modification

      Development of a CD-ROM (image) that makes an unmodified Xbox run any unsigned code from the CD, and can make the Xbox start bootloader code as described in Task 4 (with the Xbox kernel intact) or as in Task 1 (with the Xbox kernel not being used any more).


      & "All solutions have to be legal." They don't give jurisdiction, so I assume that applies globally, including the US.
      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    16. Re:Prize ? by kistel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but it will be an EU guideline, not a law. This will be implemented by laws independently in each member country. And, this will not happen too fast.

      IMHO the main problem is that the EU tries to follow the US in many ways, even if those are Not Good(tm).

      Who was it who said "We'd better follow the American's dreams instead of the American dream..."?

    17. Re:Prize ? by kill-1 · · Score: 1
      Sorry, but it will be an EU guideline, not a law. This will be implemented by laws independently in each member country. And, this will not happen too fast.

      Well, here in Germany we probably have our version of the DMCA by the end of the year. That's fast enough.
    18. Re:Prize ? by kubrick · · Score: 2


      I'm guessing the word 'trusted' here doesn't apply to the customer?
      </tongue_in_cheek>

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    19. Re:Prize ? by egreB · · Score: 1

      Good thing Norway's not a member of EU, then. But the way norwegian policies are at the time, it's not too unlikely they'll pass the law in Norway. I sure hope not.

  4. Finally by davidstrauss · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can spend $200 on a poor-quality, non-upgradable (and non-waranteed) Pentium III instead of building my own for about the same amount.

    1. Re:Finally by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pentium III ? More likely Celery^Hon according to this screenshot...

    2. Re:Finally by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      According to http://www.chipworks.com/news/11Xbox.htm, it does use an Intel Pentium III. Ignoring certain information returned by a processor can falsely indicate its speed and model. Early releases of Windows 98 said PIIIs were PIIs.

    3. Re:Finally by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 1

      According to this page and this one, it uses the Celeron. Well, mabye they used the PIIIs at first, then switched to Celerons later to keep the price very low. That's a possibility. Or mabye they used a P3 with the cache reduced (isn't that a Celeron anyway ?)...

    4. Re:Finally by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I can spend $200 on a poor-quality, non-upgradable (and non-waranteed) Pentium III instead of building my own for about the same amount"

      I'm sure Linux users everywhere are ready to buy a PC from Microsoft so they can run Linux on it. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Finally by norton_I · · Score: 2

      What I have heard is that they used a custom PIII/Celeron with a 100 MHz FSB, 128K cache, and a different cache associativity (higher) than either the PIII or the PIII Celeron.

      I don't remember the exact deal with the cache, but the configuration is not identical to any desktop or mobile PIII Intel sold.

    6. Re:Finally by peterprior · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm.. thinking about it.. seeing as Microsoft is making a loss on every box sold, and hoping to make money on the games instead, if we ALL by an xbox but no games, Microsoft should go bust :D

    7. Re:Finally by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      I believe Celerons produced during the PIII era used a PII core.

    8. Re:Finally by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Smart move. Not only will you cause damage to the game market (which, btw, lends a huge hand to making the PC market successful), but you also give MS reason to buy a few senators and get shit like the SSSCA passed.

      If you don't believe what I'm saying will happen, then here's an alternative point of view: You can't possibly buy enough XBOXes to make MS go broke. 10 million would have to be sold in order for MS to lose 1.5 billion.

      There's no way 10 million people would buy XBOXes and go "Yeah! Im screwing ms!!" and not think about doing something practical with them, like playing games.

      Face it, you're not going to succeed at doing anything but make MS invest more in DRM. Good choice.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Finally by HansRH · · Score: 1

      That is my understanding as well. Despite the fact that it has 128K L2 Cache like its Celeron sibling, the cache is 8-way set associative like the PIII.

      Sources: Anandtech (specifically discussing Xbox and other consoles), and Firingsquad discussion of PIII and Celeron differences.

      Hans

    10. Re:Finally by peterprior · · Score: 1

      I'm very sorry... what was I thinking?

    11. Re:Finally by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I apologize for not seeing the humor. You're not the only one that suggested buying systems to screw MS. The other dude sounded pretty serious about it.

      Sorry bud. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:Finally by peterprior · · Score: 1

      np... :)

    13. Re:Finally by Stormie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pentium III ? More likely Celery^Hon according to this screenshot...

      Actually the Xbox CPU is neither a P-III nor a Celeron, but something inbetween. It has only 128KB of L2 cache (like a Celeron, a real P-III has 256KB), but that cache is 8-way set associative (like a real P-III, a Celeron only has 4-way set associative cache).

    14. Re:Finally by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      That's in the US.

      Here in Europe you get the previledge of spending $450 on an X-Box

    15. Re:Finally by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I hate to question the logic of engineers, but it does seem pointless to me to keep the cache size the same, but make it 8-way set associative.

      1-way Set associative means that basically you can't store two numbers with the same lower bits. This isn't that big a deal, since memory is usually used fairly contiguosly (sp?), so the lower bits change a lot.

      However, you do sometimes want to cache two address with the same lower bits, so to do this they came up with the idea of 2-way set associative, where you divide the memory in half, and make half of it a place to put the second-address with the same lower bits.
      I'm not very good with explanations.

      But basically, say 4-way set associative was good enough not kick out cached values too early, then changing that to 8-way would halve the effective cache, without helping anything.
      They are banking on 4-way overflowed too often.
      Which I'm very surprised at, as games do tend to run in very small memory and code loops.

      I'm going to shut up now..

    16. Re:Finally by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      $450?

      The price of Xbox in the UK is now £159 (around US$ 250. Which part of Europe still has them at this price?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    17. Re:Finally by AYeomans · · Score: 1

      Or you can spend $200 on an upgradable warranteed 800 MHz PC with LindowsOS.

      If only they were available in UK. Still, the X-Box is now $201+tax, not too bad an exchange rate.

      --
      Andrew Yeomans
    18. Re:Finally by Hanul · · Score: 1

      Price dropped to 249 (from 299) in Germay last week. 479 was just in the first few weeks. Sales were so low MS had to cut the price nearly in half now.

    19. Re:Finally by Stormie · · Score: 2

      I hate to question the logic of engineers, but it does seem pointless to me to keep the cache size the same, but make it 8-way set associative.

      Well, I guess the important thing is that having the 128KB cache instead of 256KB saves money (obviously vital for a games console), whereas going with the 4-way cache instead of 8-way wouldn't save much if anything.

      However, you do sometimes want to cache two address with the same lower bits, so to do this they came up with the idea of 2-way set associative, where you divide the memory in half, and make half of it a place to put the second-address with the same lower bits.

      2-way set associative means that each piece of memory can be cached in two different places (and when it needs to be cached, some algorithm e.g. Least Recently Used will be used to decide which of those places it should be cached). This is unquestionably a good thing, it means you can avoid ping-ponging if two subroutines being called alternately both happen to map to the same cacheline. It certainly doesn't mean that you can only cache half as much stuff or anything bad like that.

      8-way set associative is quite high.. probably high enough that as long as your code fits in cache, you won't get any evictions due to different chunks of code fighting over the same cachelines..

      There can be a performance drawback to increasing n in an n-way set associative cache, as the increased complexity of the cache lookup logic means that it can be slower to retrieve a cacheline. I have no idea if there is a difference in practice between the P-III and Celeron L2 caches, though.

    20. Re:Finally by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      Netherlands

      It was just a cursory look - maybe i could find a cheaper price if i looked harder

    21. Re:Finally by sheean.nl · · Score: 1

      Eur 270

      --

      If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving definitely isn't for you.
    22. Re:Finally by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      The idea is that you can cache two bits of memory with the same lower bits. We both agree with that (I think - your wording is slightly wrong at the start).

      But if you do this, then it means you split the cache into 2, and only use the second half if the first half location is used up. _If_ you don't ever have 2 hits with the same lsb, then you won't use the second half.

      HMM. Thinking about it, we are both right - you more than me. Because you have split it into 2, you are halving your range (you reduce the number of bits that you include in you lsb by one) and so what would originally go in the second half, now tries to go in the first half, then overflows to the second half. Ah..

      So yes, there is no drawback. (other than what you mentioned)

  5. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I can finally play TuxRacer at one FPS instead of all those crappy professionally made Xbox games!

  6. more screenshots? by kemster · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have some screenshots of the Xbox playing games with Wine running on X and Linux? Because if I can play PC games with Wine, X, and Linux on it (and a modchip of course), then I'll definitely get one.

    1. Re:more screenshots? by lmfr · · Score: 1

      As you can see by the frame rate of tux racer, no accelerated driver exists for Linux, and it probably wont ever, for no specs exist, no open source driver exists with 3d acceleration, and I really doubt NVidia will have one available for that card. (Until someone hacks the driver?)

    2. Re:more screenshots? by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      just how different is the Xbox hardware? i always thought it was a pc with a hand held controller and a TV out.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    3. Re:more screenshots? by wheany · · Score: 1

      You were wrong.

  7. Mirror before it gets slashdotted by barureddy · · Score: 1

    I don't run any servers so I can't provide the bandwidth.

  8. Almost like by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    a PC!

    [No wait! Zot!] NO CARRIER

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Almost like by tshak · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Just like the PS2! Dumbass.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:Almost like by Matey-O · · Score: 2

      OR a dreamcast, toaster, hottub.

      YOUR point?

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  9. finally a reason to buy a box by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 1

    Just kidding.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
  10. More importantly, how about Apache... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Samba, FTP, POP, NNTP, Squid, NFS, Grid engine.

    Y'know, all those services that an ISP or similar might find handy in a *big* server farm.

    Hey, how's about a Beowulf of those. :)

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by David+McBride · · Score: 1

      Much better than that.. you can have a Linux server farm sponsored by Microsoft. They subsidize production and sell those things at a loss, remember.

    2. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? This thing is the antithesis of server class hardware. It's a consumer toy, designed as cheaply as possible, with tons of things attempting to prevent you from doing computer-like things with it.

      If even one of these things makes it into a commercial server environment, I will be very surprised.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      Well, if they can run stuff like X11 and StarOffice (!) on it, I'm pretty sure everything on your list is supported (assuming there is no problem with the NIC)

    4. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Replace "commercial server environment" with "mp3 server for the kitchen"

      Actually I would get one if it can play DivX movies with it without modchip (Linux or no Linux)

    5. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

      If you want MS to sell a lot of these babies, without making profit on the games, get Internet Explorer and Outlook running on it. I would buy a dozen for the office.

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    6. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Not any more. The XBox has been in production long enough that they cost less to make than they sell for. And Microsoft wrote off the development costs against taxes a year ago.

      They make a profit on the boxes, now.

      --
      -- Alastair
    7. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by revoemag · · Score: 1

      Nope. Its pretty much commonly known that MS is still losing money on each console. Unlike PS2 and GC, the X-box has 2 extra pieces of hardware. The HD and the LAN adapter. And they have not sold enough hardware yet.

    8. Re:More importantly, how about Apache... by faaaz · · Score: 1

      Why would you need Internet Explorer or Outlook? You can use Mozilla and Sylpheed instead, at least that's what we use at the office.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
  11. Doom 3 by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is awesome! Why is this awesome? Because now people who have an Xbox will be able to play Doom3 at the *same time* that it comes out for the PC.

    All this without the Anal Leakage (TM) that is the Xbox gamepad.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Doom 3 by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Why is this awesome? Because now people who have an Xbox will be able to play Doom3 at the *same time* that it comes out for the PC.

      Well, maybe you and a couple other people in the world.

  12. keybaord by *xpenguin* · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm typing this into KMail using a USB keybaord

    Looks like it's a buggy USB keybaord.

    1. Re:keybaord by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      I'm leaning towards the fact that due to Microsoft Ethernet vulnerabilties, a varius (probably kaoshide) infected the WM_LBUTTONDOWN message queue. That seems more likely on an MS system.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  13. The Linux Che by zapf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Check out this picture.

    "this is the beginning of microsoft's end."

    Because everyone knows that Tux Racer is going to be the catalyst for change.

    Oh, and GLTron.

  14. Why this is a good thing by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There's a reason why I think this is a Good Thing, and it goes beyond some stupid "Microsoft sucks, make them spend money!"

    This is the true beginning of a low cost, easy to use system. If the boot up totally doesn't destroy the system, for $200 you can get yourself a machine that:

    • Plays games (hopefully, the Xbox will have better exclusive games than just Halo and Shenmue II).
    • Plays DVD movies.
    • Plugs into a TV (which every American has), monitor (which most people can get for cheap).
    • Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).
    • With one hardware base to deal with, it should be easy to develop driers for - a major thing for developers. In some way, the Xbox Linux system could help for quick development (much the way that Quake III first came out for the Mac systems, since hardware wise there was a set "known" value for hardwae).


    This won't be perfection or anything as silly as that, but I'm curious to see where it goes. Great work to the team.
    1. Re:Why this is a good thing by InnovativeCX · · Score: 1

      ...Not unlike my laptop ;)

    2. Re:Why this is a good thing by neo8750 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).

      this plan works till your boss walks in and see you playing halo.

    3. Re:Why this is a good thing by el_benito · · Score: 1
      "With one hardware base to deal with, it should be easy to develop driers for"
      Whew! Dude, thank Gawd! I, for one, am so freakin sick and tired of dealing with wet PS2s!
      --
      http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    4. Re:Why this is a good thing by inerte · · Score: 1

      But I believe MS loses money on Xbox sales. If people start to pay 200 for it and use it with other purposes, MS might raise the price.

    5. Re:Why this is a good thing by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2

      And just give the market to Sony? Sony, who at least has a Linux kit (granted, they make it just about as proprietary as possible, but it's the thought that counts, I guess) would laugh their asses off if Microsoft raised the price of the Xbox to make up for heavy linux based sales.

    6. Re:Why this is a good thing by X0ff · · Score: 1

      This is NOT the beginning of a low cost, easy to use system. This system is low cost only because Microsoft is losing money on each box sold. Once a serious trend develops they will accelerate the develpmont of the HomeStation and get rid of it.

    7. Re:Why this is a good thing by mad_cow · · Score: 1

      Plays games (hopefully, the Xbox will have better exclusive games than just Halo and Shenmue II).

      The xbox has, of late, had pretty weak titles. Just around the corner, though, there are a number of interesting candidates: that Star Wars RPG by Bioware, Panzer Dragoon, and Psychonauts all have a bit of my attention. The guys at Penny Arcade just had a little discussion about the Xbox and it's lineup of games.

      Plugs into a TV (which every American has), monitor (which most people can get for cheap).

      Plugging a computer into a TV doesn't really intrigue me. It's got crappy resolution and is generally not set up properly for you to do any real work with. I have one a Shuttle Spacewalker hooked up to the TV in the living room, and it's only really good for playing divx's on a screen larger than the monitor.

      Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).

      I think that, for the most part, getting Linux running on the xbox is just a novelty. It's right up there with running Linux on PS2 or Linux on the Dreamcast. Cute, but really pretty useless. The other thing that concerns me is the quality of the hardware itself. Microsoft's taking a hit on each and every unit that they sell, so it makes sense that they'd try to reduce their loss by putting lower-end components into the case. I think that it's probably quite good to play games on, but I question its reliability for anything more intensive. Especially in a business. Then again, the price is about right to try it out, and if it doesn't work, it's not much of a loss.
    8. Re:Why this is a good thing by zaffir · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shenmue II was released on the Dreamcast in Europe. You can either import it and use a boot disk (freely available at a number of sites, www.dcemulation.com being one of them), or download a pre-cracked version (although 4 CDs will prolly take you a long time on a p2p network).

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    9. Re:Why this is a good thing by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

      Just a bit of trivia - Shenmue II is not an Xbox exclusive. It's available for Dreamcast (PAL only).

      You can add a DVD-ROM drive to any PC for as little as $30. Doesn't a modchip for Xbox cost around the same, if not more?

      You can plug your PC into a TV or a monitor, too.

      If you've already paid for that monitor or TV, you can get a PC that runs Linux for $200.

      So basically, what you're saying is that for $200 you can get a computer that runs Linux, plays DVDs, and plugs into a TV or monitor...or you could pay the same amount get an Xbox, which is non-upgradable, and doesn't have all the standard ports that a PC has?

      --
      Oops!
    10. Re:Why this is a good thing by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      Well, what really gets me is that you can have a high quality AV system that has almost all the hackability of a PC, but without having to deal with various noise (both signal and auditory) issues that a cheap box you built yourself would have.

      I mean, have it be an mp3 / movie playback system for your nice highend AV setup. You got dolby 5.1, you could use divx's with AC3 support, the works. And it has lan.

    11. Re:Why this is a good thing by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Runs Linux for network admin types (imagine a few of these suckers in your business - $200 for a Staroffice/web browsing/java running machine).

      Call the sales rep from IBM and say "no". If he asks why, explain to him that $2000/seat for fully supported workstations is too much. We decided to use the guy with blue hair, a bolt through his nose, and a minivan full of cracked $200 game consoles.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    12. Re:Why this is a good thing by Boxcarwilli · · Score: 1

      Great, now they will have a monopoly on the hardware...........which is even worse their their current monopoly.

    13. Re:Why this is a good thing by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      And I must say that it is well worth importing. Shenmue 2 EU was one of the best games that I have ever played. It was truely an epic.

    14. Re:Why this is a good thing by pmz · · Score: 2

      There's a reason why I think this is a Good Thing, and it goes beyond some stupid "Microsoft sucks, make them spend money!"

      I stopped thinking the X-Box was a good thing once I saw "Microsoft". It doesn't matter what functions or specifications the X-Box has, because Microsoft is one company I will never invite back into my home.

      Recommending the X-Box also means recommending: proprietary file formats, perverted standards, overwhelmingly aggressive business tactics, and Palladium. All good, right?

    15. Re:Why this is a good thing by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      --childish sig--

      Could you also warn us with --childish post-- so we can skip your posts, please?

    16. Re:Why this is a good thing by pmz · · Score: 1

      Could you also warn us with --childish post-- so we can skip your posts, please?

      No.

  15. Advantages? by extagboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there any real advantage to doing this (graphics maybe??) on an X-box as opposed to a real pc or is just something to do when youre bored?

    1. Re:Advantages? by rosewood · · Score: 2

      $200 is pretty fucking cheap for something like this ?

    2. Re:Advantages? by caferace · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I know I'll get modded down for this. Enjoy.

      The advantage to doing this is to fsck with Microsoft. The rest is just gravy. I do love the .png from sourceforge though. That is too cool.

  16. Soldering required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    or just a DVD boot into Linux?

    can you read/write from the hard drive?

    1. Re:Soldering required? by gmplague · · Score: 1

      From the readme:
      Linux can also mount non-locked HDDs on the box IDE port. By
      default we do not mount any HDD. Although we have the code
      and keys to unlock the drive in software we decided not to
      issue it yet due to the trouble bugs would cause. It is
      believed that a UDMA drive of reasonably recent vintage is
      required for correct operation with the nVidia chipset
      currently.


      So in answer to your question - "sorta" but that should be a definite "yes" shortly.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    2. Re:Soldering required? by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      But you still need the modchip ?!

    3. Re:Soldering required? by warmcat · · Score: 2

      Yes, you need some kind of modchip / BIOS replacement in order to get any unsigned executable to run on the box, including Linux.

  17. Is there any point to this? by pubjames · · Score: 2


    I've never understood what all the fuss is about with Linux on the X-Box. Apart from being a fun hack, is there any point to this?

    1. Re:Is there any point to this? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      You can run lots of Linux software on it. Cheap webserver, fileserver. Run a few arcade game or computer emulators on it. Makes a cheap broadband web browsing box, sit in the living room with a TFT screen and the XBox and chill out...etc....

    2. Re:Is there any point to this? by J_DarkElf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure there is a point.

      An X-Box is basically a custom built PC, so if you run Linux on it, you get a cheap, quite powerful, near intell-compatible computer, with a powerful graphics card.

      That's why MS made the X-Box OS so limited, they don't want people to use it as a cheap PC -- it is being sold far under cost price, so they'll have to earn money on it by selling games.

      If you run Linux on it, and play free games instead, you are costing Redmond quite a lot of cash ;)

    3. Re:Is there any point to this? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the same point as fussing about running linux on a playstation, or on a dreamcast, or on my cellphone, or on a nintendo, or, or, or, or.

      why does there have to be more of a point than just people playing around and showing others who might be interested?

    4. Re:Is there any point to this? by lmfr · · Score: 1

      is there any point to this

      Yes, "it's a fun hack" :)

      Besides, they're breaking microsoft's security system. Err... one that gives more trouble than usual.

      Some will say "beowulf cluster", stack of xbox, xbox in the office, etc., but those forget that there are cheaper, faster, and better supported standard pcs around...

    5. Re:Is there any point to this? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      Besides, they're breaking microsoft's security system.

      which security system is that? firewall, encryption, authentication? help me out here?

    6. Re:Is there any point to this? by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've never understood what all the fuss is about with Linux on the X-Box. Apart from being a fun hack, is there any point to this?

      Yes, there's a point to it. These geeks are demonstrating the stupidity in crippling a computer with DRM, and they're deriding Microsofts attempts to make a so-called "secure platform". Microsoft has said that they want the future for PCs to include these crippling technologies. What they are doing is proving to MSFT customers and shareholders that the company is full of shit, and DRM can't be done (never mind whether or not it should be done).

      I don't know if that's their motivation or not, but that's the effect. Their motivation might just come from solving a difficult problem and learning something in the process - you should try it!

    7. Re:Is there any point to this? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      An X-Box is like a custom built PC?

      What's so custom about it?

    8. Re:Is there any point to this? by lmfr · · Score: 2, Informative
      The part of the system that stops you from running unsigned code, change the OS, use the hardware as you want...

      Different that other security measures, this one is intended on stopping the user, owner of the machine, to do with it as it pleases him.

      Anyway, google, and the paper.

    9. Re:Is there any point to this? by msaavedra · · Score: 1

      The XBox has hardware-based security to prevent running unauthorized code. Read here for an in-depth description of how the security was cracked.

      --
      "Any fool can make a rule, and any fool will mind it."
      --Henry David Thoreau
    10. Re:Is there any point to this? by ferrocene · · Score: 1

      Why do people ask this EVERY SINGLE TIME someone gets linux to run on some hardware. Can't people just assume that this question is going to be asked? I predicted at least 2 people would "complain" about the "point of it" before I clicked on the link, and so far I'm on par.

      What's the point on getting linux to run on anything? Productivity? Games? Graphics? Pursuit of knowledge? I mean, that's why we have open source, right? So people can learn from others on all types of hardware and software. Free flow of information. My own theory is the point is in the journey, not the destination. But that's just me.

      --
      Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
    11. Re:Is there any point to this? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "why does there have to be more of a point than just people playing around and showing others who might be interested? "

      Because the content providers are already in a nasty tizzy over circumvention of protection devices? Hackers/Crackers already have a bad rep that's helping get shit like the DMCA passed. More of this kind of stuff without an obvious helpful reason is just going to make them spend more money on politicians.

      You really want MS to back the CTPBPTPBA?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:Is there any point to this? by jsdkl · · Score: 1

      A great wise person once said, "If you have to ask why, you don't understand."

      'Nuff said.

      Ryan

    13. Re:Is there any point to this? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "This sort of action is ammunication *against* the DMCA etc and worth supporting for that reason even if you don't see point to it other than a fun technical exercise. "

      It won't happen though, will it? Some dumbshit's going to port MAME over to the XBOX and show people how you can turn it into an arcade box. Trust me, the content peeps will find a way to twist it. "They're just using it to pirate ROMS!!!" and some dumb crap like that.

      Before you argue with me: Just because the hypothetical argument isn't rational doesn't mean they wouldn't try it. This is the same industry that said that Apple was promoting piracy.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:Is there any point to this? by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      for $200 I thought they where 733 celerons , 10 gig hd and 128 Meg of ram .... thats pretty cheap ... where can I get better?

    15. Re:Is there any point to this? by mobets · · Score: 1

      hmmm, they had Intel Alter a chip for them, nVidia alter a chip for them, figured out a fast and efficient way to have the video card and processor share the ram. It is very custom.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    16. Re:Is there any point to this? by npietraniec · · Score: 2

      No...

      If you have to ask, then you'll never understand.

      Saying that you're asking because you don't understand is a pretty blatently obvious statement.

    17. Re:Is there any point to this? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Thats a custom computer for MS... when I think of custom PC though, I think of customized for the end user.

  18. toaster-linux by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

    But wait, I can run Linux on my toaster, Look I opened a telnet session to my blender, ftp'd to my refigerator and I can finger my microwave - I am working on getting TUX Racer to run at 0.5 FPS - I'll post screen shots as soon as I do.

    1. Re:toaster-linux by dirkdidit · · Score: 2, Funny

      and I can finger my microwave

      That is undoubtedly the most disturbing thing I've ever heard in my life.

  19. One Possible Use by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

    Not to slightly contradict my previous statement about building your own PC for the same price, but I do see one use: a networked audio appliance. The combination of the ethernet and digital sound output would integrate well into a home-theater setup. Good remote control and on-screen displays would round out the setup nicely. It would be much cheaper than Sonic Blue's solution.

    1. Re:One Possible Use by boopus · · Score: 2

      Well, with Sonic Blue's solution, you're paying for the software, the pre-hacked linux kernel, and the support. You pay through the nose for it, but you get a lot. You can plug it in and think of it as a music appliance, not a computer playing mp3's. Ask anyone who coughed up $1200 for an empeg (the central is designed by the same group) if they think it was worth the price...

      That being said, an xBox hacked to be a home audio server would be a nice toy and a great way for a geek to get extra value out of it when they already want it for games.

  20. Hold on a second.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How do we know the screenshots aren't created with a PC connected to the TV? :)

    1. Re:Hold on a second.... by davidstrauss · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do we know you're not just a Microsoft employee posing as a /. user?

    2. Re:Hold on a second.... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      You don't but I assure you I'm not (and never will be). It was just a thought, development seems to of moved on quite rapidly from a small distro that didn't do a lot to one that is almost complete.

    3. Re:Hold on a second.... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      development seems to of moved on quite rapidly from a small distro that didn't do a lot to one that is almost complete.

      The porting was quick because it's... not really porting. Internally, the Xbox is just a normal wintel PC, celeron CPU, NVidia graphics, ATA hard drive, etc. Once the kernel boots, and drivers exist for the graphics chipset, it's pretty trivial to throw everything else on.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    4. Re:Hold on a second.... by gmplague · · Score: 1

      Actually you do know it's not connected to the TV... If you watch the video, you see him pull out the monitor, and hook up the keyboard and video, and see the x-box logo, see him put the disc in. So it's pretty clear that it's the X-box.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    5. Re:Hold on a second.... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      How do you know that wasn't a just to throw you off, and the monitor was really fed a signal wirelessly? Like those Amiga terminals.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    6. Re:Hold on a second.... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Timmeh, in post 4185950 , pointed to this video file that shows the setup and booting of Linux on the X-box. It would be better if it showed them taking the x-box out of a sealed package first (i.e., no modifications), but this is still pretty good (and I don't know if it's possible without mods anyway).

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    7. Re:Hold on a second.... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      pointed to this video file

      Lovely. A video clip showing Linux installation that's a Windows avi so we can't (easily) watch it on a Linux box.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:Hold on a second.... by damiam · · Score: 2

      Have you ever heard of mplayer? xine? xanim? avifile? xmms? Most or all of these come with any recent distrobution.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:Hold on a second.... by kistel · · Score: 1

      Uhm. You know, once I saw a show of David Copperfield. He was floating around a scene, and a lot of cameras recorded it from every direction as he flew by.

      So it's pretty clear he _was_ flying.

    10. Re:Hold on a second.... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      "posing as a /. user"

      hmmmm

    11. Re:Hold on a second.... by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      It's probably a DivX file. Besides, mplayer and Xine can play almost anything nowadays. If your Linux box has good video accelleration, it can be done with no load on your CPU. Plays back just as nicely (sometimes better) as Windows with most codecs.

  21. Go loss leader! by jmd! · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Go loss leader! I didn't really need another PC, but if me buying an xbox to use as a PC costs Microsoft money, then I guess I can find some use for it.

    1. Re:Go loss leader! by ryants · · Score: 2
      but if me buying an xbox to use as a PC costs Microsoft money
      Uhm... not buying the XBox would probably hurt them more, don't you think?

      I'll bet you're one of those kinds of people that sees "Save $100 off product Foo!" and will rush out and buy Foo, even though you don't need one, just to "save" the hundred bucks.

      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    2. Re:Go loss leader! by GreenPhreak · · Score: 2

      No, actually buying the system and not buying games costs Microsoft more money than if you were to not buy the Xbox at all.

      You see, Microsoft is selling the Xbox at about 150 dollars below the cost of manufacturing it. They make up that money by selling games at a profit price, but if you buy the Xbox and then don't buy their games, they have lost money. Thus, people buying Xboxes and then using them as Desktop systems with Linux ends up costing Microsoft in the long run.
      QED

      --
      I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi
    3. Re:Go loss leader! by ryants · · Score: 1
      If it costs Microsoft $100 whenever they sell an Xbox, they are actually losing that money.
      And not buying it costs them:
      • the cost of manufacturing a unit.
      • the cost of storing unsold units.
      • market share/sales numbers that the MarketRoids can use (most important).
      That which is seen, and that which is unseen, as the old economics saw goes.
      --

      Ryan T. Sammartino
      "Ancora imparo"

    4. Re:Go loss leader! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      So I pay 200 so Microsoft loses 150? how is that going to work?

      Look at it this way. Let's say I own a candy making shop where I make cotton candy on sticks. Let's say that my cost to make cotton candy is $1.50 per unit including the cost of sugar, electricity to run the pot, colouring and the stick.

      I open my shop and sell you cotton candy on sticks for $1.00 each. I'm losing 50 cents on each sale, right? I paid $1.50 wholesale for something that I'm selling to you for $1.00 retail.

      How long is my store going to stay in business before I'm so far behind on my rent payments that the bailiffs lock my door? This is where business volume can work against you. If I am selling 10 items per day I will go broke more slowly than if I am selling 100 items per day. "Hey, my store was a huge success! People were rushing in steadily and purchasing the product!" But I went broke.

      See?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    5. Re:Go loss leader! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Heh. That's interesting math:

      Manufacturing cost = $350 (not sure if that's true, but we'll run with it just for giggles)

      MSRP = $200

      When an XBOX is sold, MS makes MSRP - a very small commission for the store it's sold at. (Stores make nearly no money on Game consoles.)

      So MS is out $150.

      When the item is out, MS is out $350.

      So, as near as I can tell, $350 > $150, therefore MS loses more money when an XBOX isn't sold.

      Now, your argument is that people should buy XBOXs and not buy games for them. (In other words, people should pay for nothing) You're assuming that when you sell that XBOX, nothing will be there to replace it. WRONG. MS will not only make another XBOX in it's place to sell, but it'll be cheaper. Manufacturing cost is based on the total money spent to make these units divided by how many are sold. It takes a lot of money to get the factory started and so one. Once that's done, it just keeps churning out consoles. As time goes buy, the price goes down. (Not including that CPUS, RAM, etc get cheaper over time...) Eventually, MS will sell these at a profit. (assuming Sony/Nintendo don't undercut them to death.)

      Now let's get back to the pscychology of buying a unit and not buying games with it: You're screwing yourself out of $200 that way. MS's systems sold # goes up, giving people more reason to buy one. They're going to buy it and play games for it. Meanwhile, you either have an expensive doorstop, or a shitty Linux machine. Woop-de-doo. 10 million XBOXes would have to be sold for MS to lose 1.5 bill. They have 40. Can you honestly tell me common sense wouldn't prevail with 10 million+ people involved?

      If you don't like MS, don't buy their products. 'Sticking it to them' is not likely to do anything but good for them.

      Frankly, I'm sick of all these "I hate MS" posts. If you get so zealous about attacking MS, not only will you never be taken seriously, but you'll also give them the ability to say "were just misunderstood." Pick your battles. Fight MS for making you buy Windows, don't fight MS for making a good game machine.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Go loss leader! by caferace · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I'm sick of all these "I hate MS" posts. If you get so zealous about attacking MS, not only will you never be taken seriously, but you'll also give them the ability to say "were just misunderstood." Pick your battles. Fight MS for making you buy Windows, don't fight MS for making a good game machine.

      Whatever. I hate Microsoft with good reason. They totally screwed over a company I used to work for.

      Here is a wrench in your "math".

      Buy a Xbox with the sole intention of putting Linux or whatever on it.
      Microsoft uses that sale (amongst the aggregate total) to estimate the projected revenue from future game sales.
      Games sales disappoint Wall Street analysts, since the boxes weren't used for the purpose intended.
      Microsoft's stock price declines, the dominant market share is weakened, and they have to behave like a good corporate citizen.

      I kinda dig that scenario. Not like Xbox is going to precipitate this, but....

    7. Re:Go loss leader! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Microsoft's stock price declines, the dominant market share is weakened, and they have to behave like a good corporate citizen"

      Stock price and market share are not the same thing. Market share is how many people have XBOXes and how many people have GameCubes. Stock price is a measure of investor confidence. Since MS is so big, XBOX could be a flop and hardly rock their boat, stock-wise.

      "kinda dig that scenario. Not like Xbox is going to precipitate this, but.... "

      The only harm you'd do is to the game companies trying to sell games. Not cool. Not cool at all.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Go loss leader! by tealover · · Score: 1

      Whatever. I hate Microsoft with good reason. They totally screwed over a company I used to work for.

      If your mentality is indicative of the prevailing level of intelligence at your former company, I don't think Microsoft had to work very hard to screw them over.

      But you sit in your mom's basement and put the finishing pieces on your Takedown of Microsoft. I'm sure Patton got started in a similar fashion.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    9. Re:Go loss leader! by nathanh · · Score: 2
      So, as near as I can tell, $350 > $150, therefore MS loses more money when an XBOX isn't sold.

      This assumes that all the X-Box units have already been made and are stored in a warehouse somewhere.

      The more likely scenario is that Microsoft built a few 1000 extra units and builds more as stock is sold. So let's assume 1000 units are sitting unsold in a warehouse. That is $350,000 in stock. Nobody buying another X-Box therefore costs Microsoft $350,000. But if 3000 people buy an X-Box and Microsoft achieves a best case scenario of having no stock left then Microsoft loses $450,000.

      The 1000 units in stock number is a fictional guess, but the thought process illustrates that your logic is flawed.

    10. Re:Go loss leader! by caferace · · Score: 1
      But you sit in your mom's basement and put the finishing pieces on your Takedown of Microsoft. I'm sure Patton got started in a similar fashion.

      Oooh. Did you take Debate 101 in Junior College? I'm stung to the core.

      Mom doesn't have a basement at her new house, I'm nearly 40 and the best I own is a PS1. I find bugs in other peoples software. It's my job and I seem to be pretty good at it. Your point?

    11. Re:Go loss leader! by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Off-topic mini-rant: Why can't you write "thousand" where necessary to aid literacy? "MS built a few 1000" reads like "MS build a few one thousand".

      It seems I've been told this a 1000 times...

    12. Re:Go loss leader! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Oooh. Did you take Debate 101 in Junior College? I'm stung to the core.

      Mom doesn't have a basement at her new house, I'm nearly 40 and the best I own is a PS1. I find bugs in other peoples software. It's my job and I seem to be pretty good at it. Your point?


      If you're as good at debugging software as you are at debugging your arguments, you may want to look for another career.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    13. Re:Go loss leader! by caferace · · Score: 1
      Good lord. I wish I could mod myself down.

      Since you're apparently too much of a wuss to post with a email address, and your website consists of the brilliant text: "Under reconstruction" I guess my only retort available is here in public.

      Blow me, schoolb0y. You have no skills.

    14. Re:Go loss leader! by ianweeks · · Score: 1

      It takes a lot of money to get the factory started and so one. Once that's done, it just keeps churning out consoles. As time goes buy, the price goes down. (Not including that CPUS, RAM, etc get cheaper over time...) Eventually, MS will sell these at a profit. (assuming Sony/Nintendo don't undercut them to death.)

      Xbox CPUs are getting more expensive. They use Celeron 700s, which are already very old. Intel has to keep producing these CPUs especially for the Xbox. So Intel hardly has any economies of scale (small number of CPUs) and high opportunity costs (instead of Celeron 700s they could be making Pentium4s). Nvidia has the same problem.

    15. Re:Go loss leader! by dennism · · Score: 2

      Now let's get back to the pscychology of buying a unit and not buying games with it: You're screwing yourself out of $200 that way.

      What? I don't get it -- I can think of a number of reasons to buy the X-Box without games -- and none of them involve "screwing over MS":

      DVD Playback

      DiVX Playback

      Emulators

      Homebrew Games

      I think that I can get $200 worth of use out of the X-Box without even buying one game. If the functionality provided by the X-Box meets your needs and is worth the $200, then go for it. The games you buy at Toys R Us and Wal-Mart aren't the only things that make it useful.

      --
      dennis
    16. Re:Go loss leader! by wheany · · Score: 1

      What huge surge?

      Who in here honestly thinks that people buying an Xbox just to run Linux on it would make any noticeable bump in the sales?

      Yeah, hahaha, I know, MS hasn't sold many Xboxes anyway, so a few slashbots buying one just to stick it to MS would double their sales. Hahaha! But seriously though, does anyone think they can really influence MS's sales figures?

    17. Re:Go loss leader! by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Analogy is flawed.

      A more accurate version is this:

      You've made thousands of sticks at a cost of $1.50, and they're sitting in your warehouse. If no one buys them, you've lost $1.50 per stick. But if people buy them, you're only losing $0.50 per stick.

      It's called unsold inventory.

    18. Re:Go loss leader! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Since you're apparently too much of a wuss to post with a email address, and your website consists of the brilliant text: "Under reconstruction" I guess my only retort available is here in public.

      Blow me, schoolb0y. You have no skills.


      Heh. Pathetic.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  22. Re:yay! by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    What did they loose? A broadside?

    There are significant between loose and lose
    I know, I should just let it go, but I'm curious: What is so difficult about spelling "lose" properly?
    The correct spelling even saves you one keystroke per occurrence.

    Ah, well, back to work.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  23. Re:driver bug by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

    I beat you by two minutes.

  24. This is great! by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    Everytime someone buys one of these and put linux on it, it COSTS MS money...
    Lets drive them out of the console market an hurt them so much they dont come back.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2
      Everytime someone buys one of these and put linux on it, it COSTS MS money...
      Lets drive them out of the console market an hurt them so much they dont come back.


      All you Anti-MS zealots have your fun picking on MS, but don't destroy the game market in the process.
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:This is great! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      How the hell are folks going to destroy the game market by messing with MS?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "How the hell are folks going to destroy the game market by messing with MS? "

      Buying a bunch of systems and not buying games? Can you honestly tell me that screwing game companies is the right away to approach an attack on MS?

      Think about it. That's why there was so much hooplah over the release of the PS2. It was $200 in the hole on a per unit basis as well. Sony needed 4 games per unit sold, and at best they got 1. The PS2's launch titles sucked so ppl watched DVD's on it instead.

      If that kind of shit continues, the game market will have the same breakdown it did in the Atari days. It doesn't take much for a game company to say "well just make another Quake killer, we can't risk doing something original."

      Call me nutso if you like, but if you hurt small game companies in this little spat, then you're no better than MS.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "the game market can go to hell for all I care. "

      Bad call. The success of the PC is largely in part due to the success of the game market.

      "This is a cheap box, one that I can use for any number of things including linux development. I can throw it in the corner and have a mp3 server... "

      If that's what you want to use it for, have fun. If you want to use it to 'screw MS', then you're not doing anybody any good.

      "I don't buy things for games. There's no reason to. "

      I'd correct that by saying "There's no reason for YOU to [buy things for games]." Which is a fair statement that I'd have no problem with.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "How would this destroy the *CONSOLE* game market?

      How does it help the market? "We'll push MS out so that only Sony and Nintendo will compete"? Yeah, thanks. Brilliant.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:This is great! by revoemag · · Score: 1

      actually MS begged the publishers not to make ports and for the most part they didn't.

    7. Re:This is great! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      okay, fine:

      a.) XBOX, being PC based, is easy to develop for. Therefore you can get started cheaper than with Nintendo or Sony.

      b.) More choices = more competition. That's always good.

      c.) Sony's arrogant as all get out. Trust me when I say: You'd rather have MS in the ring than Sony. Sony doesn't give a rat's ass about developers.

      d.) MS added a new twist to the console arena with the built in hard drive and ethernet port. What did Sony add to the PS2? Nothing of interest. The PS2 is a harder-to-program-for minor update to the PS1. They don't care to do anything but milk money where they can.

      e.) I don't think you're going to pay any attention to what I'm saying so I'm gonna stop here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:This is great! by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1
      Because the introduction of the Xbox has ennervated the games industry, like it or not.

      Good try, but that's actually an antonym of the world you were *thinking* of, which is probably 'energised' (-ized for the Americans in the house).

      Enervated means "To deprive of nerve, force, strength, or courage; to render feeble or impotent; to make effeminate; to impair the moral powers of."

  25. Good good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that an Amiga monitor?

    1. Re:Good good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    2. Re:Good good by hpavc · · Score: 2, Informative

      cool thing about those monitors always was the dual RCA inputs ... and the toogle .. very nice design.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    3. Re:Good good by woodja · · Score: 1

      It's the original Commodore 1084 monitor manufactured around 1987. My parents still have it and it works like a charm. See http://amiga.emugaming.com/monitors.html for a photo of one.

  26. Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2

    if we went and did that, now would it. Where's the fun in that?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      "Childish" isn't the right word, but it's the first one that comes to mind.

    2. Re:Yeah, but it wouldn't *cost* MS $150 a pop by Art+Deco · · Score: 1

      Early reports were that M$ lost money on every X-Box it sold. The old razor and blade game; sell the razor at a loss and mark up the blades a bunch and make your money there. If it is true that M$ looses money on every box it sells than buying them up to run Linux would hurt them. While it may be true that M$ lost money initially I don't believe that they would let this situation go on for long.

  27. Re:yay! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are significant between loose [dictionary.com]

    significant what? significance is maybe what you had intended to type? perhaps, you wanted to type "There are significant differences..". perhaps it was just a human mistake. regardless, what you intended to type, and what appeared on the slashdot posting were two entirely diferent things causing significant disruption in the overall karma of the slashdot world.

    ah, well, back to browsing.

  28. Screenshots! by Motor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hehe... I've been to enough computer shows to know that a box (be it Mac/PC/X-Box) sat next to a TV/monitor showing an interesting demo is just not something you can believe!

    --
    We all know that crap is king
    Give us dirty laundry!
    1. Re:Screenshots! by Timmeh · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's exactly what I thought too, I mean, other than that I don't think they'd do that kind of thing on the official page or anything. But, check out this video: http://xbox-linux.sourceforge.net/pic/xbox-linux2. avi, it's 1:34 minutes long, encoding in DivX 5/mp3 and it shows him setting it up and booting up. Putting the cords in and everything. Fairly Convincing.

    2. Re:Screenshots! by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      And screenshots are??

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:Screenshots! by Cranky_92109 · · Score: 1

      The fact that the TV is actually an old Amiga monitor makes me a lil suspicious. Though that doesn't really mean anything since back in my college days, an Amiga 1084 on top of a VCR for a tuner was all the TV I had. :)

    4. Re:Screenshots! by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      it's 1:34 minutes long, encoding in DivX 5/mp3 and it shows him setting it up and booting up. Putting the cords in and everything. Fairly Convincing.

      Considering the amount of people that have been fooled by first person demos, I certain wouldn't believe anything that doesn't involve downloading the source code and setting up myself.

      But then again, I'm no offering $200K.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    5. Re:Screenshots! by rhysweatherley · · Score: 2

      So, get a chipped X-box, download the distribution, and try it yourself. Or wait for a zillion other /.'s to do it and report their experiences. With open source, checking for a fake is trivial.

    6. Re:Screenshots! by crivens · · Score: 1

      Me too. Even if he showed us a video of him doing it, it would be too easy for him to hide the cable running from his PC to the TV.

      It's a con I say!

    7. Re:Screenshots! by fzammett · · Score: 1

      BEST... SIG... EVER!

      --
      If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
    8. Re:Screenshots! by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      it's 1:34 minutes long, encoding in DivX 5/mp3 and it shows him...

      So why is it that this, and just about all the other (ahem) DivX content has the same soundtrack? Must be an encoder thing...

    9. Re:Screenshots! by ces · · Score: 1

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  29. And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by unsinged+int · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Check this out.

    Some choice quotes:

    Where was the idea to xbox-linux born?
    To run unsiged code on the Xbox, wouldn't it be enough to write a boot loader, make someone with the SDK sign it and spread it on the internet?
    Is your project illegal? Doesn't forbid the DMCA all this?

    1. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by g4dget · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder whether your German is any better than their English.

    2. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by fo0bar · · Score: 1

      I thought that site's grammar was exceptionally good considering the project is run by germans (IE, english is not their first language).

    3. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by nulleffect · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it was translated from French with one of those nasty web translators.

    4. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

      Okay crucify me...I didn't know they were Germans. I would have cut them more slack and not posted that had I known.

    5. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by guzzloid · · Score: 1

      http://www.satirewire.com/news/0010/international. shtml

    6. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by warmcat · · Score: 2

      American, Austrian, German, English, and other places too.

    7. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Shows what you know. DMCA is now a verb, as in "Didja hear Apple DMCAed some poor sap for getting iDVD to run on non-Apple drives?"

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    8. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by vandy1 · · Score: 1

      Well, mine is, but hey, that's why I've been studying German 5 years...

      - Ich hasse diese Englische Dummkopfen!! ;-)

    9. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by SilverSun · · Score: 1

      FYI
      Ich hasse diese englischen Dummkoepfe!!

      --

      KdenLive/PIAVE - non-linear video editing

    10. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by kju · · Score: 1

      You are studying german for 5 years and you cannot write 'Ich hasse diese englischen Dummkoepfe!!' correctly? Ich glaube nicht, daß Du wirklich gut Deutsch kannst.

    11. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      No, if you're going to post on Slashdot, that needs to be:
      I wonder weather youre Germans any better then there English.
      There, that's fit to be printed in the Boston Globe! I mean, "Their, thats fit to printed in the Boston Globe!"

      >;)

      (Apparently, the editting in the Boston Globe has been going downhill, allowing things like "His wife and him were..." - it's all been downhill since the Boston Globe was bought by the New York Times. >;))

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    12. Re:And you thought Slashdot's grammar was bad... by vandy1 · · Score: 1

      Tja, ich erinnere mich nicht immer an die pluralen von Korpeteilen... Wir duerfen beim HSC (das ist so wie das Abitur) naemlich ein Woertebuch benutzen. Michael

  30. Incredible. by cioxx · · Score: 1

    Finally I can start a web hosting business!

    Thanks linux guy.

  31. Way to go... by Badanov · · Score: 1

    Nice work so far. You all should be proud.

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  32. Your camera is faulty by cca93014 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, you need to take your camera back to whereever you bought it. There's some really fucking annoying penguin stuck to the lens that's being included in every shot.

    I can't believe you haven't noticed it.

  33. tux racer by mgebbers · · Score: 4, Funny
    TuxRacer also runs (look at the new screenhots on the website), but only with one frame per second.


    so it's the same as a normal pc with a geforce then


    **boom boom**

    :D

  34. Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    Then he would have enough money to buy a beowulf cluster consisting of 1001 of them (Including the own he currently owns ;-) )

    This expensive cluster would probably run a modified version of Tux Racer at a decent number of FPS.

    1. Re:Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

      "This expensive cluster would probably run a modified version of Tux Racer at a decent number of FPS."

      I doubt it... it would however contribute to Global warming.

    2. Re:Wow, if he gets the $200,000 by tunah · · Score: 2

      He can do this without the $200,000. With microsoft's security record, you don't need to own them, just to 0wN them ;)

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  35. xbox.com hosted on XboX by BeyondALL · · Score: 1

    Is http://www.xbox.com/ hosted on a XboX running Linux with Wine + IIS ???
    I'd love to see that ;-)

    --
    "If you keep an open mind people will throw a lot of garbage in it."
    1. Re:xbox.com hosted on XboX by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2


      I can't verify it's NOT on an X-Box, but, here's a bit of info that would help in the persuit of the truth.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  36. bit thin on details by g4dget · · Score: 2
    I couldn't find a lot of details on the web site. I suspect this involves changing the BIOS, right? Or can this be run simply by sticking a CD/DVD into the machine and powering it up?

    How far are we from a Linux distribution for the Xbox that can be booted from CD? I think that would be great for a web server farm (or a home web server).

    1. Re:bit thin on details by littleRedFriend · · Score: 1

      You could click the hyperlinks on their site.

      Task 1: Replacement BIOS

      Due tue the work of serveral people, we can boot Linux through a replacement ROM. The kernel and the initial RAM disk reside in the ROM. The Xbox hardware is initialized, but video output does not work yet.

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    2. Re:bit thin on details by g4dget · · Score: 2

      Well, the video hardware clearly is working (though perhaps unaccelerated), since something is being displayed, so that paragraph is out of date. The question is: what point are they at now?

    3. Re:bit thin on details by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      'minor modifications' in my mind quite easily converts to 'get a modchip'. unfortunately xbox modchips aren't yet dirt cheap enough to justify buying the 250$(here) machine. for ~330-350$ you can get a bit of pc hardware too.. and as far as it comes at just pure gaming platform my already outdated pc has kicked it's arse all the time it has been on market.

      i'm wanting one as heart of mame cabinet though.. ;)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:bit thin on details by Troed · · Score: 1

      You can get modchips for $20 if you're good at soldering yourself. If you want one of the better ones, professionally installed, you're looking at ~$80

  37. RE: DRM Can't be done by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    While the 1st-gen DRM schemes can be broken, what happens when better integration prevents you from being able to "chip" a machine? What happens if the cost of the chip (and installation) keep going up?

    I think this is more of a lesson to MSFT about what precautions you need to make for a DRM box to really work!

  38. It's all evoultion. by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 1

    God creates man... Man creates computer... Gates creates microsoft.... microsoft creates most sucessfull OS on the market... DOJ distroies microsoft... Linux inherits the earth.

    It's even true on a Microsoft piece of hardware. How 'bout them apples Gates?

    1. Re:It's all evoultion. by selan · · Score: 2

      And it could even work without the DOJ step. Linux inherits the earth because Linux is just better :).

  39. A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on Xbox by neverkevin · · Score: 2, Informative

    To all those people who think buying an Xbox and running Linux is good because it causes Microsoft to loose money, your better off not buying an Xbox. Microsoft has already taken a loss on those nice shiny new Xboxes that you see in the stores. By buying them you are helping Microsoft recoup $200. If you don't buy the Xbox then Microsoft is out an additional $200.

    And if you want to keep Microsoft out of the console market your better off buying a Playstation 2 and some games. Building up Sony's market share is more likely to keep Microsoft from making an Xbox2 then Linux Xbox. Of course , Sony's business practices aren't much better then Microsoft, but that is going way off topic.

  40. xmame by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What we really need to get running on this is xmame. Nearly 3500 arcade games on your living room television set!

    Now there's $200 worth of entertainment!

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:xmame by tunah · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    2. Re:xmame by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Not done.

      xbox-mame uses a pirated copy of the xbox dev kit, copyrighted by Microsoft. That's why MS could and did shut 'em down.

      This, though, should allow us to get "real" xmame going in it with no need for MS's dev kit. Then MS will be unable to shut that down and all they could do is fume silently while the rest of us are going "WOCCA WOCCA WOCCA WOCCA GULP!" (Hey, Bill did say that Linux was PacMan so heck - if you've got it flaunt it! *tee hee*)

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    3. Re:xmame by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2

      All the time on /. we see people that do not read the article, and yes some of us get mad, and some just laugh. This guy though has gone to a new low and not even read the article that he posted. Had he read the article that he linked to he would have seen that is clearly says it is no longer hosted because it was not legal ... o well so goes Slashdot :)

      (Sorry had to do it)

      --
      man .sig
      No manual entry for .sig.
  41. Re:better call your lawyers by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 3, Informative

    xbox linux is ILLEGAL software. The developers have broken microsofts encryption to run their own ILLEGAL unlicenced software. This is a violation of the DMCA, and you could be SUED.

    Who gives a flying fuck anyway? BTW, Microsoft seems to be passive about 'hack the box' issues so far(from the net hack for Halo to Linux)...maybe they want xbox to get some more attention in the news?

    If Microsoft wanted to, they would have sent the Bill Gates Swat Team and stormed their ass down already.

  42. Re:better call your lawyers by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 1

    Microsoft should hire the guy's for actually trying to do something useful with an X-Box, I mean for God's sake how many freaking gaming consoles does the world need !!!

  43. In the olden days.. by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... we used to buy game machines to play games, not turn them into half-assed computers.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:In the olden days.. by beruche · · Score: 1

      ...Well, there's the Intellivision computer addon (the ECS) on my bookcase at the moment. I love it to pieces, but if I even called it half-assed, I'd be overestimating it. Then there was the Aquarius, the Coleco Adam... But they're fun at least!

    2. Re:In the olden days.. by gozar · · Score: 1
      ... we used to buy game machines to play games, not turn them into half-assed computers.

      No, in the olden days we turned computers into very capable game machines! I know I played more games on my Atari 800XL vs. my Atari 2600.

      --
      What, me worry?
    3. Re:In the olden days.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Hey!! I had an 800XL too!

      I miss that little computer. :( *Sniff*

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  44. It's a small step... by Libor+Vanek · · Score: 1

    ...for Linux but big crash for Pd ;o) (I think MS is testing some basic components here - running signed code only, special BIOS etc. etc.)

    1. Re:It's a small step... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      I agree. The XBox is a perfect testbed for that project whose name shall not be spoken.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  45. Yawn... by Jerf · · Score: 2

    You know, people have been saying this since at least the Intellivision. Try #1 Try #2 (And something for the 2600 is niggling at my brain... there might have been something for that, too.)

    After 20+ years of this line... I'll believe it when I see it. Not one second sooner. And with Microsoft fighting this tooth and nail... frankly, the Dreamcast had a much better shot here (what with most or all of them able to run custom CD-ROMs with no modifications to the unit), and it didn't happen either.

  46. Re:yay! by perlyking · · Score: 2

    That's just rediculous!

    --
    no sig.
  47. CD32 runs Amiga OS! by incunabulum · · Score: 1

    whoop-dee-freakin'-doo!

    --
    Why does this sig rock so hard?
  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. Re:yay! by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

    I believe the post was written in Shakespearian English, which had no fixed spelling. Often lose and loose were used as a sort of double-meaning. See page xxxv of the introduction to The Everyman Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice." Do you see how irritating off-topic references are?

  50. Hello moron by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot. Pure and simple.

    If you DO buy an X-Box even without buying any games you are still giving MS $200.

    If you do NOT buy an X-Box, MS gets NOTHING from you. That costs them more than simply buying the X-Box and then not buying any games.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  51. C= Lives! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Check out screenshots here.

    The monitor looks a lot like a Commodore 1902A. I think they're just faking us out with some Commodore-64 graphics!

  52. James Bond is convincing too. by sapped · · Score: 1

    Oi, just because it is a video doesn't mean that it can be believed. You can rent a James Bond movie at Blockbuster where it actually looks as if he can singehandedly save the world - without getting his tie out of place!

    With a little bit of video editing experience I could put together a video showing you where I just put together some code and voila - there is a new OS on the screen of my PC!

    However, all the cynicism aside - I doubt these guys would do that as it would be a fair bit of effort and they would be nailed fairly soon.

    --

    Employing incompetence: $35/h
    Fixing the resulting mistakes: $1000's
    Employing me: Priceless

  53. At last! A way to fairly compare PS2 and XBOX by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The means is upon us at last to fairly compare the power of the two systems - the ultimate benchmark, Tux Racer!! Can the PS2 Linux system beat 1 FPS?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  54. Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by kajoob · · Score: 5, Funny

    at this rate, we'll only have to buy up a shade over 26 million of these puppies to eat up Microsoft's $4 billion cash reserve. The Empire is about to fall!

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by msevior · · Score: 1

      Interesting! That 26 million is about the difference between the number PS2's and Xbox's sold. However has 40 billion in reserve so they're prepared to lose 10% of that to get in the game with Sony.

    2. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by Quixote · · Score: 2
      Microsoft's $4 billion cash reserve.

      Sorry, MSFT's cash reserves were $5,116,000,000 as of 03/31/02. But, keeping cash reserves around is like keeping money in your mattress; they have invested most of it. If you count that too, their cash on hand is actually close to $40 Billion. So, you'll have to buy 260 million XBoxes, or, about 1 for every living human in the USA.

    3. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Well, don't forget that Sony is a major conglomerate corperation with its hands in the pockets of the gaming industry, the consumer electronics industry, the music industry, the movie making industry, the solid state storage industry, need I go on? They are sure to have huge cash reserves to keep their PS line up and on the go against Xbox while all M$ makes is cruddy software and overpriced computer perhiperals.

    4. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      Not funny.

      The money is lost no matter what, by buying 26 million machines MS would have extra 5200 millions extra of cash...(assuming 1Xbox=200US$).

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    5. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by randomErr · · Score: 2

      Aren't you assuming someone who buys an XBox doesn't buy any licenced games or controllers?

      I'm sure someone will buy a game or two like Toe Jam and Earl.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    6. Re:Microsoft loses $150 on each xbox it sells..... by alexpage · · Score: 1

      26 million Xboxen running Linux? Wow, imagine a Beowulf cluster of those!

  55. I apologize in advance for the following post by sheepab · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Can you imagine a beowulf clust...er...nevermind.

  56. I want one by psicE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People have said this in other forms, but no one's summed it up so far.

    When it comes down to it, why do most people use Windows? Not because it's simple or Linux is complex - most computer users couldn't install or manage Windows configurations, so the added complexity of Linux wouldn't make much of a difference if the defaults (a la Mandrake) were any good. Not because it's more familiar (Start Panel, anyone?), or because it runs their productivity apps (most people can be set up with OpenOffice and not notice a difference).

    People use Windows because it's got the games. As commentators have said time and time again, the computer industry is driven by gamers. No one buys a Pentium 4 2GHz computer with a GeForce 4 Ti because they want to run Office, eh? Geeks resort to dual-booting, Linux for most tasks and Windows for games, while most users simply use what works best - Windows for everything.

    Now, with Xbox, there's an opportunity. Games, by their very nature, defy multitasking. When you're playing a game, you're not doing anything else, period, and you expect real-time performance from your computer. No file/print serving in the background, no preemptive multitasking meaning that your game is only running half as fast as it could. The computer should be doing nothing else but running a game. When you put a game into a console, it loads up that game, isn't running anything else in the background, and thus can (theoretically) give you better performance than any desktop with a full-blown OS can.

    So, suppose you had an Xbox with Linux installed. A user decides they want to type a document, or surf the web; they boot up Linux, and can open Moz or OO. Then, they decide they want to use a game. They shut down Linux, put the game CD/DVD in the Xbox, and load it up.

    Essentially, users have the benefits of a dual-boot situation without the downsides. Games are fully integrated, having every piece of software you need to run them built-in to the disc; the fact that it uses DirectX behind the scenes is irrelevant. And when you're not gaming, you load up Linux, which requires almost no configuration because it's for a standard PC configuration; the Xbox, in fact, may soon be the most ubiquitous PC configuration (plurality) anywhere.

    Users are happy because they get a $200 computer that they can use equally well with a TV, HDTV, or computer monitor; and due to its compact nature, could easily be transported from room to room if need be. Microsoft is happy because people are buying Xboxes, which means they buy games; so MS still ends up making a profit, because most people who buy the Xbox are going to get at least one game (which puts MS almost at break-even).

    1. Re:I want one by psicE · · Score: 2

      I have to compliment you - this is one of the rare AC posts that is actually good enough for me to reply to. Wow.

      You're absolutely right - you're a light gamer. The average person wouldn't dare pause their game to read a story; and chances are, they'd have a standalone sound system, with a high-quality receiver and speaker set. Even you, when you're playing a game, aren't really doing anything else; the fact that you have a large number of applications open in the background doesn't distract from the point that, while you're playing, your computer might as well be in hibernation, except for your music (covered) and your headlines.

      As for frame rates; remember, you've got an LCD. (I've got 5. :D) LCDs have the wonderful attribute that they don't need to be constantly refreshed to keep their image. Therefore, refresh rates have nothing to do with flicker, and everything to do with blur. If you're playing a visually-intensive FPS, and you're getting 50 FPS on an LCD, there will be a barely-noticeable blur on the screen at all times, and that's it. 75 FPS is ideal, because the human eye is capable of seeing the equivalent of little more than 72 FPS, but it's much less of an issue for LCD-type displays than for others.

      Essentially, you're in a unique situation. The average gamer and PC user is nothing like you. They barely multitask at all, let alone when they're gaming. They don't develop, of course. They just want to type their docs, read their email, play their games, and be done. For geeks like you and I, we have real computers, high-end PCs and Macs. For most users, though, an Xbox will be more than adequate.

    2. Re:I want one by TheClarkey · · Score: 1

      Very very insightful. Your thoughts do bring back to my mind the Amstrad Megadrive. This was a bit of a flop, mainly because well most prefered the snes to the megadrive.

      The applications for linux on a console are also pretty well documented for developing countries. I'm sure someone (most likely either MS, Sony or Nintendo) will see this very good way to drive up sales. "Much more than a console". The smart money must be on Sony or Nintendo packing Linux into future systems or MS chucking on some version of windows.

      One problem with relying on TV sets is that you can be restricted to crappy resolution rates if you have a crap tv.

    3. Re:I want one by wsapplegate · · Score: 1

      You just forget one (very little) problem: The XBox has to be chipped to run Linux or anything else than Microsoft-blessed code. That means only knowledgeable people (read geeks ) will do that. The only others who cash out to chip their box are (1) people who want to play imported games (not a lot of people, and probably not interested in using their console as a computer) and (2) warez d00dz, who probably would boot it up just to be l33t but then put it in a drawer...

      Oh, and BTW, you need a storage space for your documents. The XBox HDD uses FATX. Does this filesystem possess all the features you would need in an Unix OS (permissions, for example)? And how do you install new software on your machine (like that personal accounting package you just saw on SourceForge and that's not included in your distro)? Sorry to say that, but for now, the XBox isn't a menace to the PC hegemony, just yet another costly geek gadget...

      [ Disclaimer: This post written in b0rkenEnglish. We axxept no reklamations on the bade gramar. Thank you. ]

      --
      Xenu brings order!
    4. Re:I want one by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      The XBox has to be chipped to run Linux or anything else than Microsoft-blessed code.

      Right now - yes. Are you sure it'll be the same way in a week from now?

      Oh, and BTW, you need a storage space for your documents. The XBox HDD uses FATX. Does this filesystem possess all the features you would need in an Unix OS (permissions, for example)? And how do you install new software on your machine (like that personal accounting package you just saw on SourceForge and that's not included in your distro)?

      What's to prevent them from making a fs-interface?
      And who cares about permissions? It's a single-user environment, not a fully fledged PC.

      Besides you said it your self - only geeks will use this, and only geeks looks for stuff at Sourceforge. The rest of the populace settles for what comes with their PC.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    5. Re:I want one by psicE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft's a big software company. Nevertheless, do you know where most of their profits come from? 40% are from Office, its biggest seller.

      Microsoft is fast realizing that a non-subscription-based Windows cannot be expected to be a moneymaker for long; people are just too prone to pirate. The idea very well may occur to them to port Office to Linux, because they know full well that they'd gain more profits from additional sales of Office than they'd lose from sales of Windows. And once MS is offering products from Linux, why wouldn't they at least make it possible (if not any easier) to install Linux on the Xbox?

      Knowing MS, they'd be much more likely to install a version of CE on the hard drive, which would allow people to run Microsoft-certified apps. But I can't think of a good reason why Microsoft wouldn't allow people to run Linux on the box, if it meant that MS would have more system sales, and thus more game sales (and more licensing fees from game developers).

      As for the other minor problems you mention: [a] The doctrine of first sale says that Microsoft can stop no person from buying a $200 Xbox, putting in a $40 mod-chip, installing Linux, and selling it for $300 plus shipping. MS may not like it, but users would; they could get a full-featured computer that ran all Xbox games for only $300, which is as much as some people paid for the Xbox as it is. [b] The filesystem doesn't need any special features. The Xbox by its nature isn't going to be used as a server, so in effect it's single-user; and there are no other filesystem features you need to download software off SourceForge (arguably we need a more standardized package format, but that has nothing to do with filesystems).

  57. MOD UP PARENT +5 HI-LARIOUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    OMFG!!! It's funny 'cause Window$ suxs!!! HA HA HA!!!

  58. Re: There's no reason to... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Tell that to everyone who plays games.

    Mine plays a fantastic game of Halo. My friends love to come in, grab some couch and a controller, and blow off some steam. It's called entertainment, and socialization, and fun. You know, fun? What you see everyone else having?

  59. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by The+Real+Chrisjc · · Score: 1

    Such a shame the psx2 is pants in comparison to the xbox eh?

  60. Job At Micro$oft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Around the time the X-Box came out, didn't some bozo at MS say that if someone were to get LINUX to run on it, there would be a job waiting for them?

    1. Re:Job At Micro$oft? by egreB · · Score: 1

      I remember something like that as well. But anyone who can get Linux to run on XBox most certainly does not want to work at Microsoft..

  61. Re:Better $200 PC than Xbox by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

    Walmart sells $200 PCs now. These would make a better PC than an Xbox.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  62. Re:At last! A way to fairly compare PS2 and XBOX by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, because the PS2-linux system supports accelerated 3D graphics. The XBox might too, in a while.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  63. Re:Better $200 PC than Xbox by Glytch · · Score: 2

    The question, of course, being which evil empire you'd rather support less.

  64. Re:tux racer by PyrotekNX · · Score: 1

    Tux Racer will run at that speed unless accelerated drivers are installed in x which i doubt they have gotten to yet.

    Maybe the linux nvidia drivers will run on that. If they do then the speed will be more like 60fps.

  65. Re:better call your lawyers by PyrotekNX · · Score: 1

    It's illegal to run unlicensed software made with MS' SDK. However Xbox linux does not use the SDK and is perfectly legal software.

  66. Screw the game companies by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    > The only harm you'd do is to the game companies
    > trying to sell games. Not cool. Not cool at all.

    No, screw em hard and screw em now. Any company that gets in bed with M$ gets screwed into the ground eventually. Best they get burned now while they still have other markets. They can take a hit to their stock price, what they can't take is allowing M$ to run Nintendo & Sony out and then be forced to assume the position, leaving M$ the only game company.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:Screw the game companies by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Yeah, good idea, get them burned before they've had a chance to make money. Nice Starbucksian business strategy there.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Screw the game companies by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      sig: If it's theft to listen to music before buying it, then it's theft to refuse returns on albums that suck.

      No it's not. Dickwad.

      a) It isn't theft to listen to music before buying it. It's breaking copyright law to make unauthorised copies of said music.

      b) Your second point is just dumb.

      Change your shitty sig, fucktard.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    3. Re:Screw the game companies by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      ") It isn't theft to listen to music before buying it. It's breaking copyright law to make unauthorised copies of said music."

      Sorry, but the RIAA already gets an economy where customer satisfaction is not guaranteed. They created a situation where people'd want to try shit out.

      And why is my second point just dumb? Is that all you have to say? Saying somebody's point is dumb without having a reason to back that up is just dumb. Heh.

      And no, I'm not going to change my sig, why dontcha grow up instead? I make a pretty good point actually. Too bad you're assuming things that aren't true. I guess it's hard to see when your point of view is obustructed by your anus.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Screw the game companies by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Shut up dick-for-brains. You don't even know what he's taliking about, so you don't know what you're talking about.

    5. Re:Screw the game companies by yatest5 · · Score: 1

      that was pretty weak, you big puff.

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    6. Re:Screw the game companies by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "that was pretty weak, you big puff."

      So, in other words, I was right and you have no means to defend yourself. Weenie.

  67. Let's not tarnish their hard work . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    First, only fixed costs decrease as volume increases. Since the xbox is basically a lower end pc (which is a mature and highly competitive market), I am willing to bet my Economic's degree that the majority of their costs are variable in nature (very easy MES point, not ideal for monopolies, low fixed costs).

    Second, the unbought xbox verse hacked xbox losses to MS projection is correct in a per box analysis. However, total losses will be much higher from the hacked xbox due to the asymetric nature of information in these circumstances.

    Third, these guys are "cool" (check out their music videos). At every point of the development of Linux, there was always someone there to complain that it just didn't make sense to port to this platform or write a clone of that application. After a decade of stubborness, the community has something to brag about, and humanity has a tool that does not discriminate based on the distribution of wealth.

    In conclusion, there is no corporate front sacred from the scrutiny and manipulation from those possessing the ability to do so. Corporations are the creations of man and, therefore, must be constantly judged by man. If a corporation were to fall from grace in the eyes of individuals savvy enough and many enough, its fate would be sealed. In the end, I do not see hate as being their motivation, but their belief that what is good, will continue to survive. Their job is simply to hasten our journey to that conclusion.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  68. Re: DRM Can't be done by Beansack · · Score: 1

    Which gives me an idea. As long as Microsoft wants to continue to compete in the low end they mush make DRM truly optional. Their software is now the most expensive part of a computer. The hardware has been getting cheaper and cheaper and ther software is getting more expensive. Otherwise the cost of closed hardware will drive the demand for alternitives and drive MS into Apple territory. Afterall, if MS is able to fritz chip all pcs, what will be the difference between PCs and Apples. Not a whole lot.

  69. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Accipiter · · Score: 2

    Loose != Lose

    Look it up!

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  70. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Slowping · · Score: 1

    My question (which I'm sure others have also raised), is why it is a good thing if Microsoft doesn't make an Xbox2?

    I'm not attacking neverkevin.... I'm just curious as to what people are thinking. Making Microsoft lose money on the XBox will only cause them to shut down the XBox unit. It's not really going to hurt their Windows or Office units.

    Isn't competition a good thing? Even though I have no wish to see Microsoft dominate the set-top-box market, their huge budget and presence forces all others to continue with innovation.

    I enjoy seeing boxes hacked, like the Dreamcast. I also like seeing Linux being used in creative locations. But I wouldn't go as far as to say we should somehow drive a potential competitor out of a market.

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *beware the cute-bunny virus
  71. Composite monitor by insanegadgets.com · · Score: 1

    They use this type of monitor because it has a composite connection. This is the easiest way of connecting the Xbox to a monitor.

    1. Re:Composite monitor by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      They use this type of monitor because it has a composite connection.

      It also has a separated-video connection.

  72. Hey look! by Pacorro · · Score: 1


    My Xbox is now an X box, because it runs X.

  73. Sorry, no 200K. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    It says something like 'runs with slight modifications'. *MEEEEP!*
    Wrong answer.

    200K still waiting for anyone who dares to go for it.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  74. Extremely Important by nathanh · · Score: 2

    I see a lot of people justifying the worth of this port. Some people say it's "sticking it to Microsoft". Others say it creates well needed negative publicity for DRM. But I'm not seeing a lot of people talking about the obvious benefit: MORE VALUE FOR THE CONSUMER!

    Imagine a CD from AOL with Mozilla on it. The only instructions required are "Insert this disc into your X-Box". The CD connects to AOL automatically. You enter a unique code (perhaps printed on the CD sleeve) and the login process is completed. In under a minute you're sending and receiving email and browsing the web. Text entry could be via an on-screen "virtual keyboard" or a USB keyboard with an appropriate dongle.

    Don't like the ISP idea? How about a Logitech USB keyboard bundled with a complete office suite on an X-Box disc. Automatic bootstrap straight into OpenOffice. Files are saved to the conveniently included hard disk. Logitech can bundle appropriate dongles to connect their USB keyboard and a USB printer to the Microsoft-USB ports. Home users who can't afford (or don't want) a PC can still reap the benefits of a word processor at home.

    This is a huge opportunity for companies to to reach a wider audience. Linux is irrelevant. What is relevant is APPLICATIONS and a closed well-defined system that can run them. If you only think of an X-Box as a games console then you're not going to be convinced. If you think of it as a cheap computer with a hard disk and broadband connection that millions of people have in their homes, then you'll understand that Linux/X-Box really is important.

  75. I might be wrong.... by akincisor · · Score: 1

    ... but I think that people buy game consoles to have fun. If some people are having a lot of fun by fiddling around with the Xbox doing anything, loading Linux on it inclusive, I think that thats good. I'm not so sure this is hurting M$ very much, it seems to me that this is bringing it additional publicity, not to mention the number of linux-geeks who will be buying Xboxes to try it out! just a thought

  76. What a logic... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You finance MS but that means you cost them cash.

    Lets see, situation 1, you buy a Xbox,

    MS invests around 350 in each Xbox: -350
    You buy an Xbox: +200

    Total for MS: -150 (plus the potential to recoup money via games, because you will buy games once the box is gathering dust there).

    Situation 2, you don't buy a Xbox,
    MS invests around 350US$ in each Xbox: -350

    Total for MS: -350. Full stop, you will not buy games even if you were tempted to.

    Now tell me, what costs MS more?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  77. Stop helpping Bill by ghinckley68 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to deal with MS software and servers all day long and they suck. However while i do not like what MS intentions with xbox are(ie dominate yet a another market) i do think the xbox is a fantastic little box. If you are running linux on it just to say you can do it great. But dont think that it is hurting them, your are doing for more to help MS then Bill could ever hope to buy. Free publicity! The best way to fight MS is to deny them existance. How many of these are going to get converted world wide a few hundred maby a 1000 tops. Bill spends that kinda of money on breakfest. Stop kidding your self people you are helpping him not hurtung him.

    --
    Linux modi 2.6.26-2-parisc
  78. Xbox has advantage over PS2 running linux by joeler · · Score: 1

    Xbox definitely has the advantage over the PS2 for running linux, as Xbox is nothing more than a stripped down pc. It is good for those people that tied up a lot of money in the Xbox, now they have more use for it. Although linux runs on the PS2, it's not going to be the primary reason people buy a PS2 because many linux programs require more porting to work on the non-intel PS2 system- more people will continue to buy the PS2 because that is where the most/best games are. Linux is great, I use it exclusively but when it comes to games, nothing beats the PS2.

    --
    >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  79. Question: why, except for the kewl factor? by jopet · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am missing something, but why would I want to use a Xbox running linux? True, the hardware is very cheap, but: on the one hand there are no good linux games I would want to play on the linux-Xbox. On the other hand the hardware isn't fit to be used as a cheap replacement for e.g. a router or a workstation for development or office applications. I dont see the point.

  80. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by darien · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If you think you can do better, create your own superpower.

    We're on the case.

  81. I use this one by Lispy · · Score: 1

    as my bedroom tv. And of course whenever i wanna play some c=64er games...

  82. Almost by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > When you're playing a game, you're not doing anything else, period, and you expect real-time performance from your computer.

    For most games & gamers, yes, I would agree - the game IS the computer.

    However I can provide a few examples where that's not 100% correct.

    When I was playing UO, I always had UO Assist, ICQ, and UO Map running. Other guilds (usually PK ones) ran IRC in the background. Why? Because the game didn't provide the proper tools to automate a lot of tedious activity / communication.

    In D2X, I usually alt-tab out to RuneWizard (to check rune words), to diabloii.net (to check stats on items), to ChippyDips skill calc, and/or to my spreadsheet template of my character's stats/skills.

    Another example: Playing a (single player) rpg/shooter, and I'm stuck for the past 30 mins. I tried everything I can think of, but it hasn't helped. Alt-Tab out to google or gamefaqs and hit the walkthru to get a hint. I know it would of been a huge PITA to quit the game, load the browser, check the info, then restart the game.

    Granted, I'm a power-gamer, but I can't be the only one, who finds it extremely frustrated when I can't alt-tab out of a game on my computer.

    Now for a console, there is no need to switch to another app in the middle of game, since you can't anyways. However, that doesn't mean you don't want access to other info when you are playing the game! What I do instead is use my main computer to load up the FAQs :-) since it is adjacent to my consoles.
    i.e. I want to try out some of the interesting cheat codes in GTA3. Pause the game, look at the computer beside me, then go back to the game.

    My $0.03

    Cheers

  83. Re:Mod chip is the problem by wheany · · Score: 1

    You are sadly mistaken. The closest thing to a killer app on the Xbox was Halo.

    Who in their right mind would think that Linux would sell more Xboxes than any game released on the Xbox.

  84. Re:A better way to make Microsoft take a loss on X by Ost99 · · Score: 1
    Of course , Sony's business practices aren't much better then Microsoft, but that is going way off topic.
    Not much better? They are actually much worse. While Microsoft is off killing competitors, Sony is out forcing DRM on Microsoft and buying politicans in order to make it law.

    What is worse? A monopoly on closed source OS, or the extinction of the pc? If Sony and Disney get it the way they want, the PC dies and a DRM Microsoft machine replaces it. Microsoft would be more than happy to just sell Office and WinXX with a subscription model giving them say $150 a year for 95% of all desktop PCs. They would NEVER have pusshed for DRM if they didn't think it would be mandated by law. Now they are just making sure they still sell 95% of all OS's (the fact that they now will sell 100% doesn't hurt, but that cannot be why MS is doing this).

    Still off topic, but Sony ain't better at all.

    - Ost
    --
    ---- Sig. gone.
  85. Cheap Linux box that costs MS money by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    It may seem strange to buy a "PC" from Microsoft to run Linux, but let's look at it a little closer.

    Microsoft LOSES money with each XBox sold. They hope to recoup that money by selling licenses to the game manufacturers. So, if say a few million XBoxes were to be sold without any game purchases it'll go straight to MS's bottom line. (So maybe it's not as ironic as it might seem.)

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Cheap Linux box that costs MS money by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Sheesh, someone always posts this on an X-box article (this is what, the 4th time in this particular one?)...

      MS already made the X-boxes. They've already lost the money. You buy an X-box, you're reducing their UNSOLD INVENTORY - you're giving them money back.

      MS will not go bankrupt because you buy their unsold boxes. Please get that into your head.

    2. Re:Cheap Linux box that costs MS money by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Yay!! Common sense prevailed!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  86. Re: DRM Can't be done by pmz · · Score: 1

    ...what happens when better integration prevents you from being able to "chip" a machine?

    Anyone out there know how much it would cost to put the important parts of a PC onto one chip using modern manufacturing techniques? This would mean anything significant to DRM (cpu, audio, and graphics) would need to be in one package soldered to the circuit board. I suppose it would have to include encrypted IDE and memory busses, too. If this can be done within the price ranges typcial for a PC, it will be done, and we really need to worry about it.

  87. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
    Europe was not united when world war 2 occured. Germany was the strongest military power in Europe at that time. European countries have a tradition of not budgeting so much weapons, in favour of things that their people gain from, but the european union has more people and greater monetary reserves than the U.S.

    You euros have been loging for the days of good old Rome for over 1500 years. Many have tried to strip away your nation identities through war, now the mega rich are trying to do it through trade but the result will be the same. Your like a buck of emotionally stunted adults longing for to be kids again, get over it and grow up.

    If you all want to surrender yourselves to an authority so you can compete with us, good luck to ya'. Youll learn the hard way... again..

    --
  88. Re:Stupid dittohead bitch by octalc0de · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded down? This is a great post. Although it could be Offtopic, it at least warrants a (Score: 1 Offtopic).

  89. BUT ITS MICROSOFT by ftg888 · · Score: 1

    I will not have anything that microsoft makes/produces/blesses in my house. Its just
    wrong.

    Now the funny thing is NVIDIA is being investigated becuase it wrote down 7 million
    worth of useless graphics xbox chips just because
    MS changed their security roms.

    Wouldn't it be funny if MS DUMPED their BOX.

    XBOX going cheap......can you say SEGA....

    K.

  90. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    are you as sure as the men who called WWI the war to end all wars??

    --
  91. Re:Yawn, another fuckwit American... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    Wars usually break out when you least expect. I am not hoping for a war, but all it takes is one nutjob with a gun..

    --