Slashdot Mirror


UT2003 LiveCD

ztc writes "Gentoo has added a Unreal Tournament 2003 demo to a version of their Linux-based LiveCD. It has up-to-date nvidia graphics drivers, sound drivers, network drivers, etc. on the CD ready-to-play. LiveCDs have always been a great way to sway potential Linux-converts, but this should really impress them! You can download the iso here." A sneaky way to promote Gentoo. I like it.

313 comments

  1. WOW! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    LiveCDs have always been a great way to sway potential Linux-converts, but this should really impress them!

    Zealot: "And look at this!! You plug in the CD, and it runs Unreal Tournament!!"

    Normal Person: "But... my Windows already does that."

    Zealot: "But you don't understand! It's better because it's Linux!!"

    Normal Person: "But it looks the same to me... ?"

    Zealot: "Well, yeah, but that's the point! It looks the same, but it's on Linux!!"

    Normal Person: "Er.. OK. Show me The Sims next!"

    Zealot: "Give me a few hours to get Quake working..."

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bold words, but true words.

      There still needs LOTS of work to get the gaming industry plugged into Linux.
      Don't get me wrong, this is a wonderful step, but to get gamers to switch is to make the games work faster, get that extra few FPS, etc...
      Linux seems like it'd be a better choice, if all games worked, because gamers tend to overclock their CPUs and the chips on their graphics card, which makes the system instable, and Linux would handle the instability better.

    2. Re:WOW! by Merlin42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Normal Person: "Er.. OK. Show me The Sims next!"

      Sure!! Right here.

    3. Re:WOW! by angst7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your point is well taken, since I often find myself playing the part of the Zealot. But there is more to it than this. I personally have been trying to get Linux to replace Windows on my PCs at home. Not simply have it there as a secondary boot. The only thing that keeps me in Windows at this point is Games. I'm a gamer, I love games, and I can't play them in Linux. This is exactly the type of thing thats needed to keep momentum moving in the right direction. We've been facing this chicken/egg situation where you cant run linux because there are no games/apps and no one will develop games/apps because no one runs linux for too long. I'm way past ready for this.

      Go Gentoo!

      (Offtopic: I have been able to completely convert my laptop to a Linux only box thanks to Mandrake 8.2/Ximian Gnome. I use it primarily for development, and I dont think I'll ever need to boot windows on this machine again.)

      ---
      Jedimom.com, ever been in a turkish prison?

      --
      StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    4. Re:WOW! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh that was funny. GJ. :)

      I remember a couple of years ago, my former office mate was really getting into Linux. He got Samba working and was reaaaally happy about that. Today I understand why Samba's cool, but back then his demo didn't impress me.

      Coworker: "Go to my Linux box under Network Neighborhood."

      Me: "Ok"

      Coworker: "See that directory there?"

      Me: "You mean the folder called 'Public'?"

      Coworker: "yeah!!!"

      Me: "okay.. I'm in there."

      Coworker: "YES!! I got Samba working!! Isn't that great?"

      Me: "Umm.. you spent all of yesterday and today on that?"

      Coworker: "Yeah! It was hard!" (if memory serves, he had a bit of trouble getting it to work on our network, we had some strange issues with it before he started messing with Samba. This was a startup company so the computers were basically band-aided together with whatever MS thought we needed...)

      Me: "You realize that a sane person could recreate that trick on Windows by right clicking here, then clicking this checkbox here, then hitting apply, right?" (I was a bit of a smeghead then, still am today.)

      After that day, a new policy was created that banned the use of the F-word above a certain number of decibals.

      Piece of advice to Linux Zealots out there: Don't brag about features of Linux designed to keep up with Windows. To the uninformed, it makes Linux sound like an un-evolved OS.

    5. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, naturally to demonstrate the ease and power of Windows, you promptly created an NFS share on your windows machine, yes?

      Then for an encore, fired up sshd?

    6. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure!! Right here.

      OK. Now show me Warcraft 3. Or Never Winter Nights. hahahahaha

    7. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can right click on a folder and do the same in Mandrake 9.0 when using KDE.

      So in all due time Linux is getting there...

    8. Re:WOW! by xtremex · · Score: 1

      So you can right click and make the directory available thru apple talk or NFS?

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    9. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normal Windows User: "Now that you showed me that, can you help me re-install the $250 copy of Windows XP I bought? It started blue-screening and rebooting itself the other day. I lost a lot of data. I really want to get it installed so I can play the UT 2003 demo."

    10. Re:WOW! by Shamanin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe the point is: Show me a CD that will boot Windows and showcase a game WITHOUT the need for installing the OS.

      Surely the game distributers would be on the losing end of a lawsuit.

      --
      come on fhqwhgads
    11. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what would really sway *me*? A fucking RELEASE of Unreal 2003, which I ordered months ago only to find out (the day it was supposed to be out) that it would be delayed at least two more months.

      How much do you want to be it's going to be delayed AGAIN in 9 days?

    12. Re:WOW! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      He *did* mention that at the time the story took place he did not understand but now does. Come on guy.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    13. Re:WOW! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      http;//www.transgaming.com

      Might just be enough for you. :)

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    14. Re:WOW! by drzhivago · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So now you've turned your $1000 ($1500, $2000, $2500, etc) computer into the equivalent of a $200 console! Hooray!

      Is that a point worth bragging about?

    15. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're joking right? Please. Tell me you're joking. No one is that stupid.

    16. Re:WOW! by Shamanin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, if you look at it as you have INCREASED your computers ability by the equivalent of a $200 console. You have to realize that in a general purpose computer the benefits are cumulative.

      --
      come on fhqwhgads
    17. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, then fired up the Computer Management Console on his Linux box to control every aspect of any NT/2K machine on the network. Oh, wait...

    18. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      can you help me re-install the $250 copy of Windows XP I bought?

      Sure I can help. Insert the CD and turn on the computer. Done. Have a nice day.

      Need help with Linux? OK - let's see here. First I need you to bring up a command shell. I don't know where it is for the distribution that your're running. Sorry. You can't find it? OK just CTRL+ALT+Backspace to get out of X. OK now I need you to type [command]. OK hmm... it looks like you're missing a package. Type [command] to install it. Dependency problem... hmmm... ok type [command]. That didn't work either eh? Hmmm... ok go to [web site] and download the source code. We'll just compile it. It's better that way anyway. OK now untar/unzip it. OK now type ./configure. Missing libraries... OK no problem. Type [command] to install the package. More dependency problems? Bummer... go to [website] and download those libraries. OK now lets install those. Missing compiler. Hmm... I guess you chose the Desktop setup when you installed the Distro. What you should have chose was the Development setup. I know... I know... you don't code... but .... well... it's too hard to explain. Just trust me on this one. OK so type [command] to install the compiler package. Yay! it worked. Break out the champagne bottles. Oh...right. That's not what we were trying to do. Sorry... in all the confusion I got side tracked and was just glad something finally worked. OK then...now back to that program. No wait... we still have to compile the libraries. Back to the libraries... compile errors. Hmm... edit the source code and see if you can find the line it's talking about and see if you can fix it. You might have to go take some classes in C programming and read a stack of books. Once you get that issue solved, then you *should* (in theory) be able to compile that program you wanted to install. What was it that you wanted to do again? Oh that's right, you wanted to check your e-mail.

    19. Re:WOW! by T3kno · · Score: 2

      This whole thing has really reminded me of the days when I would stick the Spyhunter 5.25 diskette in my XT and boot the computer to play, I never had to worry about the things that came later, himem, emm386, ad infinitum. There was something that I really enjoyed about that, just sticking a disk in, booting and playing a game. I really think this might be a great way for game companies to weane themselves from M$, press the game onto a small bootable linux cd with some fairly recent nVidia drivers (other cards too) and viola you can play. I wouldn't mind sacrificing uptime to play games if all I had to do was boot a cd. Sometimes it's fun getting the games working under winex, but most of the time I'd rather just plug and play. Gentoo is very cool for doing this, game makers take notice.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    20. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a really bad Zealot. You run Windows. You are ill informed. You don't seem to know about Wine or transgaming. You're probably talking about your Mom's computer anyway...

      Plus, you're boring. No one cares that you "want" to exclusively run Linux on your PCs especially when you don't have the "sack" to delete the fscking partition. Actually, I use XFS so I don't need to say fscking anymore...

      I wanted to not use Windows. I deleted my Windows partition. I missed my games. I bought an XBOX. I have games again. You should do this too. Check with mom first, though.

      ---
      Be a man! Don't lack sack!

    21. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then fired up XBill to show the quality of linux games, no?

    22. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Mafia? Morrowind? Battlefield 1942?

      Those are three of the best games in released recent months. And they're selling well.

    23. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to research a bit more. You can buy a system for $149 (no hd or monitor) that you could boot with this distro and play UT2003. So you've turned your $149 PC into a $200 console. Game selection is a bit thin but that will change.

    24. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... except under Windows, I play games and run other stuff in the background. I often leave stuff I'm using open, too.

      With the bootable-cd scenario, I have to close down my apps, reboot, play the game without the ability to alt-tab out to do stuff like check my email, without knowing if someone's looking for me via whatever IM network, etc.

      If I wanted a console, I'd buy one. I like my games to multitask.

    25. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "computers were basically band-aided together with whatever MS thought we needed"
      Well who wants to brag about MS crappy systems that don't want to play nicely with other computers as well as their own. Sounds like a network with a really messy configuration.

      I thought you needed a MSCE to just right click, check box, and hit aply. Knowing how much of a pain in the ass MS can be for even them I kind of doubt it would work that easly.

    26. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piece of advice to Linux Zealots out there: Don't brag about features of Linux designed to keep up with Windows. To the uninformed, it makes Linux sound like an un-evolved OS.

      (posting AC because I've done moderation on this thread)

      Samba shares aren't a feature of Linux designed to keep up with Windows. Samba is used to create interoperability between the two different platforms. Windows machines can't even read an ext2/3 partition, but Linux machines can read/write FAT and read NTFS. Sounds like Windows is behind (albeit by design).

    27. Re:WOW! by jeremy_hogan · · Score: 1

      You seem smart enough to use a break tag, but then again...

      Anyway, you and several others have missed the point(s):

      1) Every day that goes by, there is less and less of a need for Windows
      2) What does a M$ solution cost
      3) Install Linux before ranting about how easy it is to install XP with all 8 reboots.

      It's obvious from your post you have no Linux experience, and are regurgitating complaints and quotes from a year ago (at least).

    28. Re:WOW! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      " Windows machines can't even read an ext2/3 partition, but Linux machines can read/write FAT and read NTFS. Sounds like Windows is behind (albeit by design)"

      The reason I said Linux was 'playing catch up' was because the reason Linux can read/write NTFS and FAT is because Windows is the dominant factor in most networks. (usually on the client side)

      I don't intend to say that NTFS is superior or anything like that, I'm just saying that Linux has to wrap itself around the Windows world to get adopted.

      When MS just has a few mouseclicks to make a network share work, and Linux has to be bent over backwards (at the time, it's not as true today) in order to work with Windows, then the perception is that Linux is trying to catch up with Windows.

      The point I was making is that you're not going to impress a Windows user with a Linux advancement if the perception (technical merits wouldn't matter to the ill-informed) is that Windows is already doing it.

      I'm a Windows guy, in case that's not blatantly obvious. When there's an announcement like "The new kernel supports USB!!!!" , my response is "Wow, it's about time. Soon they'll support light-pens too." If, instead, the article was like "USB has been implemented in Linux, plus there are default generic drivers that'll drive most mice and printers", then 'wow', it's cool.

      I tried to make my point clearer, but I'm too tired to know if I succeeded. heh.

    29. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (posting AC because I've done moderation on this thread)

      Woops, you just undid all your moderation unless you posted from a different IP address.. sorry, better luck next time.

    30. Re:WOW! by Hast · · Score: 1

      Have you tried conencting to a Win NT workgroup with WinXP? It's damn hard, they have switched names on things and buried in a bunch of GUI's.

    31. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, I forgot that even posting AC would undo my moderations. Oh well.

    32. Re:WOW! by perljon · · Score: 1

      Linux cannot write NTFS well. Last I heard that's a good way to scramble your NTFS partition.

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    33. Re:WOW! by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Really? Isn't that what the parent poster said? read(not write) NTFS. You're a friggin' genius

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    34. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I've been hearing that linux is getting there in due time for years now.

    35. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big deal. "Ooo ooo dnscache won't run on Windows 95, therefore Windows 95 sucks anus!"

      You think that everyone should just throw their hands up in the air and forget about the whole idea of gaming on (insert favorite OS here)?

      A simple fact of life is, Win* is trying to move into the server arena, and Linux is trying to move into the desktop arena. These things happen. When they do, it's news. Get a grip.

    36. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First I need you to bring up a command shell.

      press [CTRL] + [ALT] + [F1]

      OK hmm... it looks like you're missing a package. Type [command] to install it. Dependency problem

      apt-get install
      emerge

      or, better yet,
      Need help with Linux? OK - let's see here.
      let me ssh into your box

    37. Re:WOW! by normalperson · · Score: 1

      I switched completely to Linux earlier this year, but I guess you're referring to someone else :)

      And yes, I'm a regular CPMA (www.promode.org) duelist :)

    38. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK hmm... it looks like you're missing a package. Type [command] to install it. Dependency problem

      apt-get install
      emerge


      Uhh... more likely than not, that would just cause a "command not found" type of message. Chances are a newbie isn't going to be running Gentoo or Debian.

      Need help with Linux? OK - let's see here.
      let me ssh into your box


      OK ... and if someone makes the argument to just let them take remote control of your Desktop via Windows Desktop sharing, you're just going to bash them. You're a bigot.

    39. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, I think zealots should stop trying to claim that Linux is "here" with regards to PC gaming when it most obviously is not.

      I feel those that feel it is are the ones who need to get a grip.

      Do try to stay on topic in future.

    40. Re:WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem is, it doesn't work with any of the four (and soon to be five) expansion packs that any real enthusiast of the game already has. If the expansions worked with the Linux version, I'd happily pay again for the basic game - but they don't.

    41. Re:WOW! by cheesypuff · · Score: 1

      you bought windows XP!!!????

    42. Re:WOW! by perljon · · Score: 1

      "but Linux machines can read/write FAT and read NTFS" um... no

      --
      This isn't the sig you are looking for... Carry on...
    43. Re:WOW! by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      but Linux machines can read/write FAT and read NTFS

      Um, yes. That is what he said. I guess I have to spell it out to you. He said that Linux machines can read/write FAT and can read NTFS. He only said read NTFS. He didn't say read/write NTFS like he said read/write FAT

      Read the post before replying next time.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  2. Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bootable CD ROM? As in (R)ead (O)nly? So every time I boot up the cd to play it I'm going to have to set my Player name, my character model, my screen resolution, configure my mouse and keyboard, and all the other preferences?

    1. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee good idea sparky. So every time I boot the CD the first thing I have to do is mount a partition on my hard-drive.

      Of course you're a Linux user so you're use to bending over backwards and walking on coals to do ridiculously simple tasks... so then you can come on slashdot and post to the world that after 5 years, you've finally got Starcraft working in Linux... or that you can now print.

    2. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people like to tinker with things and learn.

      Some people are lazy, unteachable and generally stupid.

      Which are you?

    3. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people are lazy, unteachable and generally stupid.

      Keep that in mind next time you take your car in for repair. Why not just fix it yourself? Too lazy and stupid? Guess what sparky. Not everyone out there cares about the intricate workings of their Operating System. You computer dorks wouldn't have a clue how to change your own oil, let alone how to fix a major mechanical problem. But do I think that makes you lazy and stupid? No... it's not your line of work. You just want to get in your car and go. Well ... wake up Linux Zealots ... us non computer geeks just want to turn our computers on and go.

    4. Re:Uhh... by Lussarn · · Score: 1


      wake up Linux Zealots ... us non computer geeks just want to turn our computers on and go.


      It's not enough when the windows users steal slashdot from the Linux users, no.. Now they are geeks to... And we Linux users are merely zealots.

      Find your own place to hang out. Or maybe we should have a linux.slashdot.org for the real geeks.

    5. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, using your (poor) analogy, cars should be easier to fix, because we're all too lazy to learn how to do it ourselves? Do you write mail to Ford telling them bastards for not including a complete manual on the fuel injection system, and you had to pay a lot of money to a mechanic to have them do it for you?

      You're almost there with your car:computer analogy, but you sort of missed it.

    6. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha ha.

      you were trying to insult someone but you said "story" instead of "store."

      you're dumb, fucktardo!

    7. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then can we have windows.slashdot.org for the trolls? pleeease ?!!

      Oh, wait, we have apple.slashdot.org for the trolls!

    8. Re:Uhh... by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      Don't forget debian.slashdot.org

    9. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would help if you read, i believe he said:
      wake up Linux Zealots ... us non computer geeks just want to turn our computers on and go.

      that was non computer geeks incase you missed it

      that and if you are a geek your generally not welcome anyways, as slashdot is the news portal for nerds

  3. Hint to the marketing department... by MosesJones · · Score: 2

    A good way to sell 3D games is to include screen shots in the demos to give people an idea of what they are going to see....

    Even a link to a site with screen shots would be a plan.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  4. Don't wanna troll but... by jedie · · Score: 0

    do you really want to promote Linux by showing 3D graphics that have absolutely nothing to do with the OS?

    Even if it isn't for the graphics, the newly converted user will feel betrayed when he finds out most games simply won't work under Linux unless he hassles around with Wine(X).

    I've got some serious doubts about this one... they should show the true forté's of the OS instead of some eyecandy

    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
  5. The way it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Bundle Linux with violent game.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    Okay, this is the 10000000th time someone posts that.

  6. Re:Call the cops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the link goes to a password protected page (or download as the case may be). Either Ibiblio has good heuristics to detect a DOS in its early stages or Gentoo's attempt as mass promotion failed due to a bug in the distribution channel.

  7. Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you already have a linux distro or windows, you can find a list of mirrors here. Warning : Its over 90mbs, but its smaller than the CD

  8. slashdot just posted a direct link to an iso by j1mmy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I feel sorry for ibiblio.org

    1. Re:slashdot just posted a direct link to an iso by jachim69 · · Score: 1

      No shit. I can't update my Gentoo system because all the G/\M3RZ are swamping the server.

  9. UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now coupling a blazingly fast Linux port, they're throwing in UT 2003. What more can one ask for?

    Maybe a coffee maker built into my PC to keep me awake for days while playing.

    --
    If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
    1. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What more can one ask for?

      The UT 2003 Demo works in Linux. Very cool. Now show me Warcraft 3... or Never Winter Nights. ROFLMFAO

    2. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UT 2003 Demo works in Linux. Very cool. Now show me Warcraft 3... or Never Winter Nights. ROFLMFAO

      But that's what VMWare is for you know. Because us Linux folks have our "principles". We can't run Windows because it's not Open Source. So we buy VMWare ... ummm ... so we can run Windows .... ummm.... within our Linux box so we can play games. Umm... [Hey guys... I forgot. Why am I running Linux again?]

    3. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's what VMWare is for you know.

      No - that's what WINE is for. So you can play Solitaire ... or maybe even Starcraft (without sound of course).

    4. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A coffee maker in a PC. Wow! That's even better than a fridge in a SGI case ( http://home.planet.nl/~mourits/koelkast/ ).

    5. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 1

      Forget the coffee maker ... we need a direct espresso IV.

      --
      I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    6. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never Winter Nights has a Linux client. WC3 doesn't interest me but it would be nice for those it does.

    7. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      [Hey guys... I forgot. Why am I running Linux again?]

      I run Linux because it's much more stable with older hardware on my server that Windows was. Why do you?

    8. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you?

      Because Linux is kewl man. Winblows is ghey. Linux roolz. I'm a 1337 h4x0r. I have sk33lz beyond belief. Bill Gates is a homo. Dual booting between Moneysoft Winblows and Linux is for pussies. And all you Mandrake pussies out there, either get a real mans distro or why don't you just run Winblows. Cause otherwise you ain't kewl like me man.

      This is my sig. Windoze is ghey.

    9. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OpenSource!!

    10. Re:UT2003 & Linux.... Works for me by Lussarn · · Score: 2


      Now show me Warcraft 3.


      You start bugging me. Posting essentially the same at two places.

      Warcraft 3 screenshot

      Do you need a video too? Now, shut up.

  10. Knoppix too. by dameron · · Score: 0

    Knoppix does much the same. Every machine I've stuck a Knoppix boot cd into came up fine and on our network without having to so much as touch the system configuration.

    http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/

    I thought about mass producing knoppix cds, like a hundred or so, and putting them in cheap sleeves and donating them to the local Salvation Army, Goodwill, whatever. Might come in handy one day when current versions of GNU/Linux are illegal because of DRM.

    Also, has anyone thought that these "live" cds such as Knoppix would be perfect for someone who wants to do things anonymously (like terrorists, or even people with less to hide), i.e. drop by a local library, university, or retailer, pop in a Knoppix cd, cruise the 'net and send a few emails, then pop out the cd and reboot the machine. Let's see the thought police undelete something from a swap file in ram...

    -dameron

    1. Re:Knoppix too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1) Some groups are already making copies of the knoppix to hand out as promotion. The Austin Linux Users Group is working on publishing a few thousand for a trade convention coming up soon.

      2) Knoppix and some other live cds may use a swap partition on the hard drive if they find it, or make a swap file on a windows partition. If you want stealth, there is only one distro for you: Tinfoil Hat, baby, nothin' but the metal hat for me.

    2. Re:Knoppix too. by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      I had never heard of this before now. I'm 54% on the Knoppix after being disappointed with UT2003 (damn my ATI card!) The coolest thing I've seen is the fact that you can tailor Knoppix to your needs and then remaster the CD. Thats pretty sweet.

  11. How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    Is it just as quick or quicker?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      I don't know, and I admittedly haven't messed with ut2003 under linux much, but it is MUCH MUCH slower than quake3 or RTCW on my machine (Athlon 900, GeForce 2Ti, 512MB memory). What is UT doing that is so special that it can't match the frame rate of RTCW, which should be the slower of the two due to the AI and such?

      I'm running with default everything. I may get a chance to actually play with it tonight (g/f was over the night I installed, and although a geek, some things take precedence over computers ;)

    2. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      I dont know how to get fps in ut2003 so I cant tell you exactly, but to me it seems to run exactly the same, the original UT runs about 5fps faster on linux , I have a pritty fast computer (2ghzp4,512M DDR,geforce4 ti4200) so the overhead of the OS is not a problem, from my exp on older hardware linux runs games much faster, for example I remember getting around 10fps more in Q3 on a k6 300 and a voodoo3 under linux (xfree 4.0 vrs WinMe)

    3. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      I'm right there with you. My p3 500 is showing it's age when I get into heated battles or areas with alot of visible distance. OTOH my Geforce4 ti4200 should be able to keep up but this damn cpu is holding me back..

      Oh well, I gotta upgrade for doom3 anyway.

    4. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by Free+Bird · · Score: 1

      It is slower.

      NOTE: I'm comparing a finely-tuned Windows system to a finely-tuned Linux system (including BIOS tweaks). In that case, Windows' desktop-mindedness helps it defeat Linux.

    5. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by idealego · · Score: 1

      The Linux version uses Opengl and the windows version uses D3D by default. Their Opengl code is a lot slower then their D3D code so the Linux version ends up being quite a bit slower.

      If they focused on only doing an Opengl renderer it would be fast on all platforms, apparently only id understands this logic.

    6. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can enable Opengl on the Windows version via uncommenting it in the ini. The performance is practically identical, perhaps half an fps different in most cases.

      Of course running in gl is worth bonus nerd points or something...

    7. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by cthulhubob · · Score: 2

      Dude, UT2003 is doing *way* more stuff than RTCW.

      Their "ragdoll" system is actually performing *both* halves of the IK solution in real-time. Prior to this, games (including Quake 3 and RTCW) had pre-animated poses and only used skeletal animation to interpolate between keyframes. See the dead bodies slumped against the wall or draped over a balustrade? In RTCW, they would be sticking *through* the wall or lying flat on top of the rail. Not very realistic. Now you see the difference?

      UT2003 doesn't even take it as far as it can go - they only do full IK on dead bodies. They're still using traditional animation on the "living" models. Once they start doing that, you'll need some *hefty* CPU power to calculate all the animation. But it will be *so* pretty...

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
    8. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by shaunj · · Score: 1

      I've got a GeForce 4 Ti4200 and I definately get better performance on the livecd than in windows. In windows I run at 1280x960 and on the livecd I can run 1600x1200 no prob (but that may be due to the fact that the live cd is A) loading ONLY UT and B) loading most of it into my memory and then running it from there)

      -Shaun

    9. Re:How does the FPS compare to Windows?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without doubt. UT2003 runs like shit for me with same card and Athlon XP2100+ (with right NVdriver and such). Too bad. :(.

  12. UT2k3 - linux impressions by Merlin42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I downloaded and installed UT2k3 demo on both my linux partition (up to date gentoo) and my W2k partition. I am running an admitidly unbalanced celeron333a w/ 192mb ram and a gf4ti4200-64mb.
    Under linux I get very choppy sound and an almost-kinda-sorta-playable slideshow after setting all the options to their min (ok I left the res at 800x600 ... 320x240 was in the list!).
    While w2k gives me a reasonably playable game ... heck its not completly unplayable at 1600x1200.

    1. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Do you use the closed source nvidia drivers or the shitty nv driver?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by iturbide · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      Does it come with the nvidia drivers? I'm just asking.

    3. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I installed UT2K3 on both of my home systems - Redhat 7.3 on an Athlon 750 with a GeForce 2 MX, and WinXP on a Duron 1GHz with a GeForce 3 Ti500. It runs fine at 1024x768 on WinXP and (a slightly less choppy) 800x600 on Redhat. Obviously these two systems aren't great for a head-to-head comparison, but it does go to show that UT2K3 is capable of running better on Linux than your experience would suggest

    4. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by AlgUSF · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah I hate when people use the nv driver, and complain about choppy video. The nv driver isn't even good enough to play tuxracer.

      When I bought my GeForce4 card and ran tux racer it was choppy and unplayable, I downloaded the drivers from nVidia, and now I can play UR2003, and the graphics are smooth as silk!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    5. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Merlin42 · · Score: 2

      Ok sorry I didn't give enough info.
      I am using the brand spanking new 1.0-3123 NVIDIA drivers

      If it helps my complete specs are:
      Celeron333a - ie the one WITH a cache and the 'blazing' 66mhz fsb
      440bx based mobo which 192mb of pc66 sdram - hey its a celeron and it goes nuts if I OC the fsb AT ALL!
      7200rpm 40gig drive for linux
      7200rpm 30gig drive for w2k - fat32 partition for easier interoperability
      SoundBlaster pci128 - aka es1370 based sound card.
      DEC de4x5 based nic
      and to top things of an ISA scsi card (please dont laugh out loud) to connect my scanner.

    6. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Go to www.nvidia.com, and click on the download drivers link.

      Click through the selections, download the kernel driver and the GLX driver. RTFM (Even geeks have to do this, because it is not the usual ./configure, make, make install) and you too can have killer graphics on your box!

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    7. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by elmegil · · Score: 1

      A celeron 333 on a multitasking OS and you expected something like the latest UT to actually work well on your box?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you've specified the right drivers in your XF86Config file as well.

    9. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Merlin42 · · Score: 2

      Actually I didnt expect it to run until ...to my surprise... I was able to run it on w2k ... I am quite disapointed that linux faired so much worse on my system, I really do hope that either I screwed something up or it is a peculiarity of my system or the beta level software.

      I do get similar SPECViewperf numbers b/w the two partitions. So maybe this is just a bad intereaction w/ my system and the beta level demo.

    10. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Adnans · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am quite disapointed that linux faired so much worse on my system, I really do hope that either I screwed something up or it is a peculiarity of my system or the beta level software.

      It's reallly ver simple. The OpenGL UT2003 drivers are pretty much unoptimized at this point. Remember, the main renderer engine for UT is D3D which means that the game will run faster in D3D mode. Using the OpenGL engine under Windows will probably yield the same crappy result. But then again a dual Celeron 333 is really not up to speed and doesn't even come close to the minimum advertised requirements for UT2003 (At least a PIII 700, etc..). Upgrade! ;-)

      -adnans

      --
      "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
    11. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by AlgUSF · · Score: 2

      I guess it is an unfair comparison though, because I am running an AMD AthlonXP 2100+, KT333 Chipset, 512 MB of DDR 2700 RAM, and a RAID1 setup (2 ATA133 7200 RPM drives). :-)

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    12. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Espectr0 · · Score: 0

      You probably are using alsa. Can it. OSS has still better support from the big guys. Demo worked flawlessly for me...

    13. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen the demo on Windows, but it runs beautifully on my P3 800, 512 MB RAM, GeForce 2 MX, SB Live!, Gentoo system. I've heard it was choppy on a comparable Windows system.

    14. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really do hope that either I screwed something up or it is a peculiarity of my system

      Jesus dude... you would rather have some bizarre unique hardware problem than admit something in Linux might be flawed?? Weird...

    15. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope I'm not insulting your intelligence by asking you this, but did you -actually- switch the drivers? As in, did you edit your XF86Config, remove "nv" from the appropriate area and replace it with "nvidia" (it may be XF86Config-4, I'm not sure). If not you might have the drivers "installed", but they're not being used.

    16. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      wow what did you do wrong?
      I have a P-III 850 dual proc system with a crappy old Geforce2 and it screams. While it sucked horribly at work in the P4-1.7 with some ATI card. I'm guessing the ATI card is half the problem with the win side... but It absolutely screamed at 1024x768 on my Linux box (and it only used one of the processors!)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by dcstimm · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might have forgot to disable arts or esd sound servers, you might have forgotten to disable AGPGART and enable NVGART, you might have forgotten to run hdparm to tweak your harddrives. Maybe your kernel is not set up correctly. Maybe your using a slow distro. Maybe you dont know anything about Linux. Maybe your SDL is not configured correctly. Maybe your using a old kernel? Maybe you forgot to enable your nvidia drivers. Maybe you have alot of stuff running in the background. try ps aux. Maybe the harddrive your using for linux is slower than the windows harddrive.

      Im sure your doing something wrong.

      try these commands

      hdparm -t /dev/hdx (to bench mark)
      hdparm -d1 -c1 -X69 /dev/hdx (I use this to turn on dma, 32bit IO, and udma5.
      do cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status

      make sure AGPGART is disabled and its running NVIDIA for the driver.

      try enabling SBA and FW, the drivers disable them by default.

      Can your board suppport AGP 4x? try turning that on in the drivers also.

      You are probably doing something seriously wrong. Linux is faster than windows, and you should get better FPS in linux.

      good luck and Next time dont post something like that with out trying everything.

    18. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      why I don't use linux reason #2768. Dude, I just want to play the game! Oh, and I want to get chastized for not knowing (and trying) to run: "hdparm -d1 -c1 -X69 /dev/hdx" before having the audacity to post a question somewhere!

    19. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo, sir! My thoughts exactly!

    20. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read in the logs at the UT2K3 website (http://www.unrealtournament2003.com/?chatlog1) that the game has been written with DirectX in mind, not OpenGL (as required on Linux based systems).. Yes I know there is WineX, but thats not quite there yet is it.. Anyway, they said they would have to do lot of work to make the OpenGL version on a par with the DirectX version.. That might explain your speed difference.

    21. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by EthSoma · · Score: 1

      This is because in Windows the game is using DirectX, and in Linux the game is using OpenGL. If you switched it to use OpenGL in Windows you'd see roughly the frame rates you see in Linux (type "stat fps" in the console). UT2K runs about 25% faster with DirectX. Nothing you can do about that.

      See http://www.thehaus.net/index.php?ent=4158

      --
      It is truely written: a man has five times as many fingers as ears, but only twice as many ears as noses.
    22. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      well thats the problem with newbies trying linux, they think it will be fast right out of the box. You need to tweek things. Its not my fault he didnt know how to tweak things.

      Most people that have weird slowness in linux go and research their problems! This guy gave up and went back to windows.

      In the README.linux it says you cant compair ut2003 for linux to ut2003 for windows. its like compairing apples to oranges.

      Also we all know the Nvidia Linux drivers are faster than the windows counterparts. Just go to tomshardware.com and search for the benchmarks they did. (they tested quake3)

      In Windows you have to do alot of stuff to get a game to work but you dont think of it as hard because it doesnt have a "command line"

      setting hdparm at boot is as hard as downloading a driver in windows for your IDE controller.

      I currently run dual p3s, and a geforce 2 mx, and I get anywhere from 40-50 FPS in UT2003. with a res of 1024x768.

      If you are going to compair something do it right or dont do it at all.

    23. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by ink · · Score: 2
      Under linux I get very choppy sound and an almost-kinda-sorta-playable slideshow after setting all the options to their min

      That's what we like to call Mesa software rendering.

      You may want to actually install the NVidia accelerated drivers before you go to publish your results. ;)

      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
    24. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      so yours runs better on redhat? You should try Mandrake or another distro that doesnt use i386 packages, that would probably give you another speed boost.

    25. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      run: glxinfo

      If it says indirect rendering, that's your problem. (By the description that's exactly what you've got.)

      A quick stop to nvidia and grabbign their linux drivers and a quick switch in your XF86 config file from driver "nv" to driver "nvidia" will fix the problems. :-P

    26. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said, there's no fair or reliable way to make a comparison between the two. The Redhat box is smoother at 800x600 than the WinXP is at 1024x768. I can't switch distros right now, my wife would kill me. She just got the hang of Linux on the desktop as it is :)

    27. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2
      Ok, well, I call complete BS on this line:
      In Windows you have to do alot of stuff to get a game to work but you dont think of it as hard because it doesnt have a "command line"
      I just recently bought and installed two games for my windows 2000 pro. system, and I didn't have to do anything for either one. Harry Potter (for my son) and NHL Hockey 2002. Both are pretty graphically intensive (I think I read somewhere that the HP game licensed one of the big engines like Unreal? I could be completely off base on that). I did *zero* other than run the install on both. Both games work flawlessly and look great on my geforce2MX/Athlon 1 ghz-- hardly the latest and greatest hardware. I do see Nvidia driver updates and DirectX versions, as well as sound card driver updates show up in my windows update notifications and install those, but that is the extent of my tweaking.
      Also, I think searching the 'net, finding the right hdparam command to run to make your system run fast, and adding that command to the correct text configuration file so it loads at bootup and downloading and installing a driver (ohh... click "open" after the download) are on completely different PLANETS of difficulty for the typical user.
    28. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      well yeah if that guys knew what he was doing and had his hardware running correctly, ut2003 would have played perfectly, just like how your games are running perfectly.

      hdparm is not new, and its not scary.

      Im sure before you installed harry potter and nhl hockey 2002, you installed you video card drivers, made sure your sound card drivers were working, you grabbed the lastest directX version. You enabled dma on your harddrive (in case it wasnt automaticly set). Im sure you also made sure things like agp 4x was enabled in your bios.

      How is this different than running hdparm and checking your nvidia drivers?

      Most distros will automaticly turn on dma by default, but if he is using a older kernel or distro it might not have happened.

      9/10 you should be able to install a game into linux harddrive and be running with no problems. but thats only if you have your system set up correctly.

    29. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Im sure before you installed harry potter and nhl hockey 2002, you installed you video card drivers, made sure your sound card drivers were working, you grabbed the lastest directX version. You enabled dma on your harddrive (in case it wasnt automaticly set). Im sure you also made sure things like agp 4x was enabled in your bios"

      No. I'll bet he didn't. I'll bet he put the cd in the drive and clicked install. And it worked.

    30. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Is EAX turned off? Its buggy in linux and slows down ut2003 on my pentiumIII700 under w2k, even though I have a sound blaster live. What sound card do you have? Try turning the sound off and see what happens.

    31. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      hey, did you even read my post? That stuff came thru windows update, downloaded automaticaally, and I said "Sure, install that." that was the extent of my 'tweaking'. Not only that, but I'd wager I can take my windows 98 cd, install fresh & those games will install and run fine (they would need DX8, but the installer would work ok.)

    32. Re:UT2k3 - linux impressions by Kraphty · · Score: 1

      I'm running it on an ATI AIW Radeon 8500 and it also screams, as you say it, at 1024x768. I've also got a friend running it on a 32mb ATI AIW, and it also looks awesome with no choppiness whatsoever on his system.

      In conclusion, I don't think it's ATI that's causing the problems.

      --


      Watch out, or I'll have the penguins eat you.

      Oh...and, I'm liquid talent
  13. Were is my pointy-horned cap? by jvmatthe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The submitter wrote:
    LiveCDs have always been a great way to sway potential Linux-converts, but this should really impress them!

    Well, I don't know exactly what the LiveCD does, but I will say that if you're trying to impress them with the game, then I'm not sure that the Linux demo is going to be that impressive to Windows people. If I were a Windows-only user, I'd ask them what the big deal was, since I could play it on my Windows machine already. And I'd point out that, despite the fact that NVIDIA cards are pretty widespread, the demo on Windows supports a wider range of cards, including the lowly 3dfx Voodoo3. And that it doesn't require rebooting the machine.


    If this were a Linux-only game that supported a wide range of hardware configurations and showed off graphical splendor that wasn't generally available on Windows, then that'd be impressive to lots of people. As much as my geeky side can be impressed by the idea of putting together a CD like this, I just don't see Windows people giving a hoot.


    FWIW, I'm not a Windows user. I only use Linux at work and at home. Heck, I even wrote an article on the Linux demo and how it came to be. But most Windows users are still puzzled about why a Linux port even exists. They're certainly not going to want you rebooting their machine just so you can boot up Linux and play it from a CD.

    1. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by Soko · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I agree that Windows users won't actively seek out this - especially if they're happy with thier current OS.

      However, this can be the coup-de-grace for the people who are merely curious about Linux, even more so to those who are considering a switch. Observe:

      WindowsUser: Y'know, I'd like to try that Linux thing but I don't want to hose my Windows machine.

      LinuxAdvocate: No problem. Here's a Gentoo Linux 1.4 CD. You boot from it and it creates a temporary but fully working Linux system. You have an NVIDIA card, so you're good to go.

      WindowsUser: It won't hose my system?

      LinuxAdvocate: Not at all. It won't even look at your disk unless you tell it to.

      WindowsUser: Hmmmmmm - OK, lemme plug it in and re-boot.

      (Many minutes of playing with Linux)

      WindowsUser: Seems stable and fast. It's alot like Windows, too. Not bad. What about games?

      LinuxAdvocate: *ShitEatingGrin* Have I got a treat for you....

      It's a marketing tool. UT2003 is just a way to draw the bees to the honey. Besides, it'd be cool to carry around your UT2003 environment wherever you go...

      Soko
      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by trevinofunk · · Score: 1

      Coming from the viewpoint of a windows user, I think this kind of thing is great. So perhaps the militant hardcore windows group wont go for it, but what about guys like me who are on the teetering edge of switching to Linux. Its sweet things like this that make the difference. And plus, when you argue with a person on why Linux is better, and they say something like "well its so damn hard to set programs up in Linus, like games", you have something to retort with.

    3. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by blixel · · Score: 2

      I'm not a Windows user. I only use Linux at work and at home. Heck, I even wrote an article on the Linux demo and how it came to be.

      It's interesting how virtually all Linux users feel the need to defend themselves against their peers by either condemning Windows or distancing themselves from it (as was the case in this post) by putting a qualifying statement at the start or end of a message when that message might potentially be misconstrued as advocating some aspect of Microsoft Windows.

      Slashdot needs to add checkboxes for posters to simply this process. "Check one or more of the following."

      "Include random Windows bash."
      "Make a funny random joke putting down Bill Gates."
      "Include random glorification message about Linux."
      "Include a statement so readers know beyond the shadow of any doubt I use Linux *most of the time.*"
      "Make up a funny acronym for MCSE."

    4. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by bauble · · Score: 1
      Well, I don't know exactly what the LiveCD does, but I will say that if you're trying to impress them with the game, then I'm not sure that the Linux demo is going to be that impressive to Windows people. If I were a Windows-only user, I'd ask them what the big deal was, since I could play it on my Windows machine already. And I'd point out that, despite the fact that NVIDIA cards are pretty widespread, the demo on Windows supports a wider range of cards, including the lowly 3dfx Voodoo3. And that it doesn't require rebooting the machine.

      This has not been my experience with Windows. :)

    5. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by CanSpice · · Score: 1

      Please note that a demo is not a game. Plus, what happens when WindowsUser gets tired of playing UT2003? They play Tux Racer? PHAAHAHAHAH, right. No, they reinstall Windows.

      If you're trying to sway over users from Windows, games are -not- the way to do it.

    6. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Imagine you wanted to talk about a minor issue regarding abortion in a political context, say whether abortion service providers should have to meet HIPPA requirements or not. You would probably need to preface your remarks in some way to able to effectively communicate that point because abortion is simply so controversial.

      Among the technical crowd the Gnu/Linux paradigm vs. the Windows+extend office paradigm for computing is deeply controversial. If one wants to discuss any minor issue they need to preface their remarks to alert their audience that they are trying to address a minor issue and not the deep issues which strain the community.

      You see the same behavior from almost any minority group which alienated from some societal trend on any issue. While I have no personal experience on this issue I bet if you went to slashsoccor any positive comment about football or basketball would need a similar disclaimer.

    7. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by abischof · · Score: 2

      Could someone explain the etymology of the "SEG"? That is, if someone were to actually eat feces, would not the face turn into a frown instead?

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    8. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by damiam · · Score: 1
      the demo on Windows supports a wider range of cards, including the lowly 3dfx Voodoo3

      Not on my computer it doesn't.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by jvmatthe · · Score: 2
      As of today, the patch for the Windows version of UT2003 has this in the changelog:
      Fixed support for Voodoo3 / Matrox G400.

      Perhaps update and see if that fixes it. (It was this patch announcement that my comment was based upon.)

      Patch available at www.unrealtournament2003.com (among other places).
    10. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      WindowsUser: Seems stable and fast. It's alot like Windows, too. Not bad.

      Anyone else gawk at that line?

      Magius_AR

    11. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      *ShitEatingGrin* Have I got a treat for you....

      A turtle head?

    12. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by isorox · · Score: 2

      And that it doesn't require rebooting the machine.

      You're saying you need to reboot with linux, but you dont need to reboot with windows??

    13. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they want to play games other than UT2003, Neverwinter Nights, Doom3, or .. Tuxracer, there's plenty of other free and commericial games available for Linux.

      Desktops, web stuff, multimedia and offices suites are already there for Linux. Games hit a little slump when loki went under, but it looks like linux gaming is picking up again.

    14. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? by jvmatthe · · Score: 2

      In order to show a Windows person a Linux bootable CD you have to (get this!) shut down and reboot. Funny how that works, no?

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. knoppix by ananke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is a bit off topic, but for the folks who are interested in trying another live linux cd, I suggest taking a look at knoppix.

    It's a really neat distribution, something you could give to your friend if he's interested in what linux is all about.

    ps) If you have trouble downloading iso from their mirrors, I have a small mirror here

    --
    --- d'oh
  16. cool idea, unless by Squarewav · · Score: 1

    what if a person has oddball hardware, or notfully supported hardware, for example I have a sb audigy, that sounds like crap under linux. if they try this live cd only to find UT2003 runs or sounds like crap compared to win32 they are going to think linux=crapy performance, and not try it again

    1. Re:cool idea, unless by forged · · Score: 2
      Hrm, oddball = any ATI Radeon 9000, 9000 Pro or 9700 Pro. How's that for oddball. I have a 9000 Pro and I'm screwed :(

      XFree86 does support your Radeon 7500 and 8500, anything more recent you're on your own ! ATI doesn't offer any better drivers, just "support" by the way of links (www.linux.org ... yeah riight, like that's gonna solve my problem).

    2. Re:cool idea, unless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, 3D support for the 9700 is expected in early 2005.

    3. Re:cool idea, unless by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Sucks when you make an uninformed purchase huh? I had an old Creative gamepad that probably only sold 1000 units. Zero support for it, then and now.

      It's always fun to get the latest whizbang hardware...until you find out the manufacturer doesn't give a rat's ass about linux. Thank god for Nvidia, even if they *are* closed-source drivers.

    4. Re:cool idea, unless by althalus · · Score: 1

      well, if they have funky hardware, STBY (sucks to be you). But as for the audigy card. Look on opensource.creative.com (which links to their sf page). The drivers work great for me. I get excellent sound from my audigy under linux.

    5. Re:cool idea, unless by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      Its always a good idea too look for Linux compatibility when getting new hardware even if you don't use Linux, I find Linux compatible hardware is 90% of the time higher quality hardware that's better supported even under windows, mostly do to the fact its not winmodem type hardware, I've seen so many windows only hardware that worked very poorly (mostly web cams) and support was non existent, no updated drivers, no faqs, nothing not even a download of the original drivers.

      in defense of nvidia the drivers are open source enofe to compile on many different distros and kernel/xfree versions, the only thing that's closed is the actual opengl stuff as opengl is still copyrighted and closed src, nvidia would be sued big time if they opened the src, they could use mesa3D but the performance drop is too much for it to be worth the time porting to it

    6. Re:cool idea, unless by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      I would but it looks like my disto (suse8) thought it would be a good idea to rename all the emu10k1 drivers, if i do a lsmod I get like 10 drivers loaded for it all of the start with snd- like snd-emu10k1, snd-emu10k1-synth, and bunch others, I cant even figure out how to restart them for when the sound realy goes to pot, if I try rmmod snd-emu10k1 I get that device or rseource busy error, I assume couse of the 9 other drivers loaded for it, if someone knows how to stop thoes drivers from loading so I can use the creative ones I will, as its one of the things thats keeps me out of linux, as all my audio sound like its being played thrue the pc speaker

  17. Dang, keep this quiet! by Argyle · · Score: 2

    I saw this early this morning and I began the download. It's at 66% now. If the hordes of /. break my d/l (the ftp is NO RESUME), I'm gunna be fit to be tied.

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
    1. Re:Dang, keep this quiet! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I just stopped & resumed @ 9% with netants. It started right where it left off.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  18. Linux Games by phorm · · Score: 2
    What we really need here though, is for the game to come out on *nix before windows. Although having a fully ready CD (video drivers and all) sounds pretty sweet - I'll be downloading it - chances are that it won't convert many windows users unless one or more of the 3 occur

    • It comes out first in *nix
    • It's more stable in *nix (yes, crash those winblows machines!)
    • It runs better on *nix (per the actual hardware) or requires less hardware power


    Oh, and yes I will be downloading the demo - phorm
    1. Re:Linux Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me be the first to say you need to get your head out of the clouds on all 3 points, because none of them are going to happen. PLEASE.

    2. Re:Linux Games by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

      Sadly I don't think this will happen anytime soon.
      The people are trying to make money off their software sales, and to do that, you have to sell to the largest market. Right now, that largest market is windows.

      Yes, it would be great to see a game come out *nix first. But, if it was my company, I'd release it to windows first, since that is where the largest market share is.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    3. Re:Linux Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Quake3 test did come out on linux first.

    4. Re:Linux Games by YGingras · · Score: 1

      Anyone who ever played 3d games on Linux know this is not true. The only way I know to crash my Linux box is to play a 3d shooter on it. Tribes 2 being the worst but anyone will do given enough coffee to let the system warm up a bit.

      Those games are closed source and their Linux version has the same bugs that make them crash Windows. When they crash, they have all your ressources locked and you recall how you fix this on Windows : the good old resset button. Try it for yourself and stop saying nonsenses.

    5. Re:Linux Games by jonabbey · · Score: 2

      Are you sure your PC has enough cooling? I had severe stability problems with my Athlon Linux system whenever I ran 3d games on my GeForce4MX, but finally I saw an error message that google indicated was linked to hardware problems, and the light went on.

      One can of compressed air and some moist paper towels later, I had cleaned a bunch of dust out of the CPU's heat sink and had improved airflow through the case tremendously, and boom, all my stability problems went away.

      Of course, using the latest NVidia drivers and specifying mem=nopentium in my /etc/grub.conf (or /etc/lilo.conf) file to work around the Linux kernel's problem with AGP on Athlon helped too, but the big thing was cleaning my case.

    6. Re:Linux Games by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

      Didn't Q3Atest come out for linux before windoze?

    7. Re:Linux Games by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

      I forgot to add to the q3a comment...UT (the first one) does run better under linux (Loki fixed a bunch of broken code as they ported it), and of course is more stable too.

    8. Re:Linux Games by glwtta · · Score: 2
      well, the second one is true (at least on my machine) and the third is arguably true - it seems that the OpenGL version runs a bit faster, I'm not sure about "better".

      However, both differences are fairly marginal, so I doubt they'll get people changing their OS just for that.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    9. Re:Linux Games by winterdrm · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then Mac, and then windows. Carmack wanted a smaller number of users testing it out in the beginning. However, later versions of the demo were released in reverse order (win, Mac, Linux).

    10. Re:Linux Games by Unregistered · · Score: 0

      "It runs better on *nix (per the actual hardware) or requires less hardware power" I know quake 3 does this. I run the windoze version under winex on my gentoo (then 1.1a) system. I can get 1280x1024x24 color with highre framerates than on windoze at 1024x768x24. I like. This was even w/ a radeon using generic X support. My only questions about the livecd are 1) doesn't it need a damn big ramdisk? 2) where did the 16mb stage 1 iso go?

  19. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux seems like it'd be a better choice, if all games worked, because gamers tend to overclock their CPUs and the chips on their graphics card, which makes the system instable, and Linux would handle the instability better.

    "Handle the instability better"?? What the hell are you talking about? Does Linux automatically check if an instruction in the CPU is executed wrong?

  20. Re:Hint to the moron poster... by Clue4All · · Score: 2

    This is put out by the Gentoo people, not by Epic. What would you like screenshots of, the CD booting? Go to Epic's site if you want to see UT2003, there were plenty of links to screenshot in the previous article on it.

    --

    Is your browser retarded?
  21. I'm not a Linux guy.. by GrayCalx · · Score: 0

    I've always been a windows guy. But this is the kind of thing that makes me want to try linux at least on a spare machine.

    Basically a grab bag of good, working, linux programs.

    This is a good thing!

  22. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's a project at SourceForge, Triple Threat Linux. It executes every instruction three times, and picks a winner. There's a perf hit, but improved reliability.

  23. Gentoo Newbie by fire-eyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just started using gentoo last thursday. This after 5 years of slackware, and only slackware.

    It's a fantastic distro for those of you with a pretty strong system, I highly reccommend it.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    1. Re:Gentoo Newbie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "5 years of slackware, and only slackware" ... so how does that qualify you to give advice? Seems like a myopic perspective.

    2. Re:Gentoo Newbie by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

      Myopic? Perhaps. You need not shoot the messenger chickens before you've tossed them out with the bathwather (all in one basket, of course)...or something like that.

      Gentoo may not be the Linux distro for everyone. My primary systems are Debian. A couple of years ago I ran SuSE on my Pentium Pro dualie. Prior to that, I ran through a few versions of Red Hat. Before that, I was downloading Slackware on the 14 or so floppies on a 9600 modem. (Chest puffing? Nope. Simply a run-though of my distro evolution.)

      I enjoy Debian's package system. I think they're working on a hardware detection system based off of Progeny's discover program. I also liked the way *BSD systems are distributed with a source tree allowing you to compile programs for your machine. In this sense, Gentoo is the best of both worlds for me: Effective packaging and a "ports tree" of sorts. Debian takes care of quite a bit of the configuration for you, and this is where Gentoo seems to depart. They leave a lot of the configuration up to whoever's got r0o7 on the box, often requiring more man page reading.

      Considering that my Sony GRX570 takes quite a bit of twiddling around with anyway, I felt confident that I could tweak Gentoo. My laptop runs some bleeding-edge acpi patches, so I figured I could try Gentoo out and not feel too badly if anything got borked.

      So far, Gentoo has been a real fun time.

      I've certainly learned more about how a Linux distro works.

      --
      -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
  24. UT2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

  25. Use a floppy disk by yerricde · · Score: 1

    So every time I boot up the cd to play it I'm going to have to set my Player name, my character model, my screen resolution, configure my mouse and keyboard, and all the other preferences?

    You don't have to do that on three out of the four currently popular video game consoles (GameCube, PS2, Xbox), which also store their software on read-only media. They have something called a "memory card" used to store game settings. (The fourth popular console is the Game Boy Advance system, which puts both read-only and read-write storage in each cartridge.)

    Know what? PCs have "memory cards" as well. Just stick a FAT12 formatted disk in the floppy drive.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Use a floppy disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PCs have "memory cards" as well. Just stick a FAT12 formatted disk in the floppy drive.

      I put a floppy in, rebooted the CD, made all my changes in the game how I wanted - but when I rebooted again, none of the changes were saved to the floppy.

    2. Re:Use a floppy disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My computer doesn't have a "floppy drive." Who needs a floppy drive when CDs like this one are bootable.

      The XBOX has a "hard drive."
      http://www.xbox.com/system/xbox.htm

      PS2 has a hard drive too. You can get it as part of the "Linux" kit.
      http://www.us.playstation.com/hardware/more/ SCPH-9 7047.asp

  26. Re:Great.. they have a Linux version but... by fault0 · · Score: 2

    What does Gentoo have to do with MacOSX?

  27. Cool--They make a PPC Linux by Spencerian · · Score: 2

    Nice to see another Linux port for PowerPC systems. While Mac OS X fills all my needs, it's still fun to tinker in Linux.

    So, that brings the Linux for PowerPC distros to the following, and I bet I'll forget one:

    -SUSE
    -Debian
    -RT Linux
    -Mandrake
    -Linux PPC
    -Yellow Dog Linux
    -Gentoo Linux
    -MkLinux
    -HA Linux

    I wonder if the UT2003 code is targeted to x86 or whether it cares. I would presume it does care a lot. A "Windtunnel" G4 has all the necessary specs, otherwise.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:Cool--They make a PPC Linux by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

      Of course it's targeted to x86.. you don't think they'd just give out the source code of their brand new game, and let people compile it for ppc hardware.

      Even so, the G4 isn't so impressive without the use of it's Altivec instructions... which is basically an apple version of mmx/sse .

      I'm pretty sure the linux kernel does make use of Altivec.

      --Me

    2. Re:Cool--They make a PPC Linux by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

      I meant.. DOES NOT make use of Altivec :)

    3. Re:Cool--They make a PPC Linux by DansnBear · · Score: 1

      Why dosn.t anybody ever take the time to reead before they comment? Taken directly from the home page:

      The Gentoo Linux development team is extremely pleased to announce the release of Gentoo Linux 1.4_rc1! The Gentoo Linux 1.4 release candidate 1 is gcc 3.2-based, supporting optimizations for Pentium III, Pentium 4, Athlon (Classic through XP,) K6 (Classic through K6-3,) PowerPC G3 and PowerPC G4 with AltiVec.

      --

      -= Who are The Headlocks? =-
    4. Re:Cool--They make a PPC Linux by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      "with AltiVec" is irrelevant, as most open-source software does not make much use of hand-coded assembly, and that which does (the Linux kernel itself) is generally too low-level for those optimizations to be made. (And remember, compilers won't usually drop in SIMD code themselves; that's why the icc MMX/SSE/SSE2 compiler intrinsics exist.) The "optimizations", in this case, are things like word alignment and instruction ordering, which must be done differently on each processor for optimum performance.

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
  28. Re:specs? by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 1

    From the Unreal Tournament 2003 Website FAQ's

    What will the recommended system requirements be?

    Operating System: WIN 98/ME/2000/XP
    CPU: Pentium III or AMD Athlon 733MHz processor (*Pentium® or AMD 1.0 GHz or greater RECOMMENDED)
    Memory: 128 MB RAM (256 MB RAM or greater RECOMMENDED)
    Hard Disk Space: 3 GB
    CD ROM or CD/DVD ROM: 8X
    Audio System: Windows® compatible sound card (*Sound Blaster® Audigy(tm) series sound card RECOMMENDED) (NVIDIA® nForce(TM) or other motherboards/soundcards containing the Dolby® Digital Interactive Content Encoder required for Dolby Digital audio. Also RECOMMENDED)
    Video System: 3D Accelerator card with 16 MB VRAM (*32-128 MB VRAM RECOMMENDED) 16 MB TNT2-class DirectX® version 6 compliant video card. (*NVIDIA GeForce 2/ATI Radeon RECOMMENDED)
    DirectX® version 8.1 (Included on game disc
    Multiplayer: Internet (TCP/IP) and LAN (TCP/IP) play supported. *Internet play requires a 33.6 Kbps or faster modem

    --
    If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
  29. Question by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Informative

    What the hell is LiveCD? :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  30. Question: Supported Architectures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any ports of UT to other hardware architectures than x86 running Windows/Linux?

  31. FTP mirrors by mortis_aeturnus · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:FTP mirrors by ananke · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because it's a slow day at work... I mirrored it too

      --
      --- d'oh
    2. Re:FTP mirrors by sahrss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I just "mirrored" it on WinMX :)

    3. Re:FTP mirrors by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      You're a brave soul. CNS is going to come after you when you peg their campus-side part of the T-3.

      I salute you. I also am thinking about grabbing my laptop and heading over to torgerson to get it locally....

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:FTP mirrors by ananke · · Score: 1

      As far as I knew, we didn't use any campus links, only for backup :)

      --
      --- d'oh
  32. Lock up the machines physically by yerricde · · Score: 1

    drop by a local library, university, or retailer, pop in a Knoppix cd, cruise the 'net and send a few emails, then pop out the cd and reboot the machine.

    That is, unless the machine's case is locked in a cabinet so that the user can't use outside software. The library would claim that outside software may contain viruses. Besides, how are you going to fit drivers for every single network card and every single modem, including winmodems, on one CD?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Lock up the machines physically by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      its called a kernel. take a look at the cd you will be amazed.

    2. Re:Lock up the machines physically by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Well, it works for my hardware.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  33. Nothing new... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...that convicted warez guy in the article below has had this for months already.

  34. About The LiveCD by psypete · · Score: 1

    This LiveCD is based off the soon-to-be-released Gentoo Linux 1.4. It's still in testing, so don't expect the cd to be perfect. There are other games released on cds like this though, such as Armagetron, bzflag, and soon to appear, pyDDR. Hopefully gentoo will make some kind of application to automate the building of these things things with other games.

    Oh, and with very small modifications you can make a cluster out of these cds. Neato, eh?

    1. Re:About The LiveCD by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Really, there's an Armagetron cd? Nice. I know there's a Frozen Bubble Mandrake-based ISO that's bootable.

      Now what I really want is a nice bootable Xmame disc. I've got the whole mame rom collection and it'd be cool to shuck a dvd to a friends' house, throw it in the pc, and boot into a graphical frontend and start gaming.

    2. Re:About The LiveCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZflag cdrom? neat! where is that?

  35. Games keep people on windows by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

    The only real windows attachment for many people are the games. If you show that Linux can run somee current games too, then they will be more open to trying Linux. It will also help encourage game developers to port to Linux.

    If you want to show someone the power of the Linux Desktop, grab Knoppix

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Games keep people on windows by AndrewGoat · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Some games. Linux has like what, 10 or less runable games and Windows has like what, a billion? Sorry guys. Nice try. Until Mac, Windows, and Linux all have ports for every game, theres still no place for a serious gamer in Linux. I like my EverQuest.

    2. Re:Games keep people on windows by IQ · · Score: 1

      PS2 runs linux. How many games work on that? 2 Billion?

      --
      Adults are obsolete children. - Dr. Seuss
    3. Re:Games keep people on windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Only if you buy it.
      There's no native OS on the PS2, just a BIOS equivalent.

      Even if there were, it's irrelevant, since they don't work on people's desktop machines, which is what we're discussing.

    4. Re:Games keep people on windows by Theom · · Score: 0

      I have MUCH more then 10 games on my box. Then agfain I'm not that much into FPS or RTS and can't afford a fast 3D card. I ahve enough games. Dorry if GNU/Linux atracts developers who make other types of games than you like.

      --

      mp3: l33t term for empty.
    5. Re:Games keep people on windows by SaturdayNight · · Score: 1

      Games don't keep regular people on Windows. Games keep medium-hard core computer people on Windows. I'm a developer, installed Linux at home, got it running and was like this is great, but no good games, so off you go Linux, back to Windows.

      Day to day computer users, my dad, mom, brother, cousin etc. however stay on Windows because of it's EASE OF USE. Like many posts here have alluded to, LINUX is not simple to install, configure and whatnot. My dad wants to buy a digital camera that he can plug in and email pictures to his friends. Takes 5 minutes on Windows, takes how long (can it even be done with included software?) on Linux?

      THAT's why people stay away. Make it easier or no significant number of people will switch.

  36. Question... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    When they say 'ready to play', do they mean it plays off the disc like a platform gaming system, or that you can install it off the CD and then play the game?

    The reason I ask is that if the former is true, then it makes Linux more attractive to me as a gaming machine, particularly if it can handle initiating those drivers while it's running. One thing that annoys the hell out of me is that games in Windows think they need to be installed first. I can understand wanting to have a save-game folder, but I find it ridiculous what all needs to be copied over to the computer.

    1. Re:Question... by psypete · · Score: 2, Informative

      it plays off of the cd right after booting it, autodetecting hardware and setting up XFree86. No need to install anything, just play.

      so people ask, "Oh, what's the big deal if i can play it in windows?" well with this disk you can play it anywhere in a matter of minutes. it's there to show what Gentoo is like and how it can be used. and like most of what Gentoo does, it's optimized for the newest and best hardware, so there are many people left out in the cold. they'll be supported later as new versions come out, but that's not why it was made. it was made to show linux's potential.

    2. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like slow games and reading the cd all the time more power to you. I for one prefer having the big hd and storing the games. This is necessary with the data being loaded or the textures being loaded to the video card on the fly nonstop. Just imagine if it had to read 15 megs of textures from a cd over and over every minute.

    3. Re:Question... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      " Just imagine if it had to read 15 megs of textures from a cd over and over every minute. "

      Modern game systems aren't exactly suffering now from it. B'sides, I have a gig of RAM.

  37. Answer by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 5, Informative

    LiveCD is a standalone bootable CD that you can pop in most newer computers, boot up and play the game.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Answer by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like the old games I had on floppy disks. The only way to play some of them, (since they used a different OS) was to boot off of the disk they were on.

      --
      What?
  38. Reasons for the CD... by Twister002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's one of the big reasons people always give for not switching to Linux? What's one of the big reasons that many of us STILL have Windows boxes or dual-boot?

    The games.

    Now we've got two or three big games being released for the Linux platforms. (UT 2003, NWN(when it's done?), Quake 3(I know released heap long time ago, but it's still a big game) Proof that Linux can run major market games. May help sway some people.

    The future

    What *I* would like to see is games released in this Live CD fashion. So that you don't have to worry about getting the latet drivers. It almost turns any computer into a gaming console. You just put in the CD, reboot, and play. Don't have to worry about clearing out hard drive space or buying a new hard drive so you have enough space. You don't have to worry about having the drivers that work with the game. It's all bundled up in the UT OS I don't know how it was for some people, but it was a PAIN trying to get Quake and Quake2 installed and running under Linux for me.

    Heck you and some friends could burn off these CD's and head to your local internet cafe or Best Buy and play some UT over the net...hehehehe

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    1. Re:Reasons for the CD... by RailGunner · · Score: 2
      I agree. Of course, I said essentially the same thing here:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=38977&c id=4169301

    2. Re:Reasons for the CD... by xtremex · · Score: 1

      I use Linux for everything....for games, I use PS2...

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    3. Re:Reasons for the CD... by sniggly · · Score: 2

      The problem with booting from a dedicated linux gaming cd is that you wont be running anything in the background such as a download or another ap you want to keep open.

      What linux needs is easy installability, easy maintainability and a good looking desktop. It's got everything else.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    4. Re:Reasons for the CD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What *I* would like to see is games released in this Live CD fashion.

      I saw the same idea somewhere: Buy a game, get a free OS :)

  39. great... by dotgod · · Score: 1

    Now you can go to any computer you want, pop the CD in, hit reset, and (assuming there's no BIOS PW) play UT on any x86 box. This could be a very fun way to piss of the people in the university computer lab, who will think you hacked NT to lower user restrictions or something.

    1. Re:great... by CaptainAx · · Score: 1

      Or you can go into your local Best Buy and throw a crossover cable between their high end computers, pop this CD into both computers and play UT against your buddy. You think the store personel would get mad?

    2. Re:great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the admin is a complete maroon and forgot to disable booting from CD or floppy, and didn't set a bios setup password.

    3. Re:great... by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Only if the admin is a complete maroon

      Check.

      and forgot to disable booting from CD or floppy,

      Check.

      and didn't set a bios setup password.

      Check.

  40. Good thing you mentioned "subs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When slashbots hear "footlong," they get really excited.

  41. Boot time by asobala · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zealot > Look at this! It's a demo of Unreal Tournament under Linux. You just put in the CD and it runs.

    Poor dude > What's all that writing?

    Zealot > That's it booting. You don't need to worry about that.

    Poor dude > Why's it taking so long?

    Zealot > That's the amazing thing! Gentoo compiles the kernel, the libraries, the compiler, the compiler again, X, AND unreal tournament before running it! So it runs really fast!

    Poor dude > So how long does it take to get working?

    Zealot > About 3 days from pressing the power on button. But it's fast!

    1. Re:Boot time by psypete · · Score: 0, Troll

      Moron > Hey! Why can't I control the weather from my brain with gentoo?

      Poor linux dev > You have to be able to not use something other than a mouse.

      Moron > Wow, so with gentoo on the cd, i have to wait for it to compile a bunch of crap?

      Poor linux dev > No.

      Moron > So gentoo is made for everyone right? I don't like it! It sucks! It means i have to type stuff! I hate linux!

      Poor linux dev > Good for you. Do i care?

      Moron > Make my programs more stable, more portable, more secure, faster, and prettier.

      Poor linux dev > Hmm, how about you make them yourself? Oh, wait, you can't, you're just a greedy moron demanding things from a guy you're not even paying.

      Moron > But... why did you make it if it wasn't for me?

      Poor linux dev > I made it for myself and people like me. If you don't like it, go use a Mac.

    2. Re:Boot time by Scutter · · Score: 2

      Poor linux dev > I made it for myself and people like me. If you don't like it, go use a Mac

      And now you know why linux doesn't have a bigger market share.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Boot time by psypete · · Score: 1

      What's a market share? :D

      For those of you who want to make money off of linux: you're not getting any help from me.

    4. Re:Boot time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit.

      This is the one thing I never really understood, linux is great for hackers, and certain corperate desktops, and servers, but everyone else complains it sucks, they shouldn't use it plain and simple.

      Linux isn't supposed to replace anything, it's supposed to appeal to a certain type of enviroment, it just happens to be so damn good at some thigns it got used in alot more mainstream ways.

    5. Re:Boot time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor linux dev > I made it for myself and people like me. If you don't like it, go use a Mac.

      There it is folks. The reason why Windows has 97% of the Desktop Market and probably always will. Question to Linux developers. Why even bother putting up a website if you're just going to tell everyone to fuck off?

  42. Re:WOW! QWZX qjkx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry man, I started doing it early this year. Looks like you started in July. To be honest, I'm surprised it took this long for someone else to run with it.

  43. Great, they have it for Linux, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the UT2003 port for Mac OS X?

    1. Re:Great, they have it for Linux, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comes out when OS X runs on a CPU capable to display UT with more than one frame per second.

  44. ATI Cards by solarce · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have not seen this mentioned yet, but I think it should be noted that it is not Gentoo's fault that the UT2003 LiveCD does not run on ATI cards. Epic made the call to only support the newer nVidia cards in the demo and it has nothing to do with Gentoo or the fact that XFree86 has less than ample support for the newer Radeon card line.

    --
    Is a Sig really an expression of the person behind the post or just random nonsense?
    1. Re:ATI Cards by psypete · · Score: 1

      You can bet gentoo will have ATI support in the next LiveCD release, though, whether the game supports it or not. All this from a guy with no job sick in bed. ;)

    2. Re:ATI Cards by jvmatthe · · Score: 4, Informative
      Epic made the call to only support the newer nVidia cards in the demo

      This is false. To cut down on traffic over the AGP bus, Epic used texture compression. Specifically, they used S3TC/DXTC, which is supported by every major, modern 3D video driver on Windows (i.e. their target audience). This extension is currently supported by only two drivers on Linux: the ones from NVIDIA and the ones from Xi Graphics. The XiG drivers support the Radeon cards, but are pay-to-use drivers. However a time-limited demo is available for free. (The server must be restarted every 25-30 minutes or so, in the demo, as I understand it. Buy the real thing, and you get unlimited use, naturally.)

      Epic has also said they're working with ATI and PowerVR (makers of the Kyro cards) to improve the binary-only drivers that each of those companies provides for their cards under Linux. If and when these drivers are released, they will be free-as-in-beer.

      Again: it is the failing of the drivers under Linux to support a required extension, not Epic. Without that extension, performance would be terrible, so it isn't an option of just turning it off.
    3. Re:ATI Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Radeons have 128MB on board, is texture compression really necessary when you can stuff so much data directly on the card rather then xfer it over and over again across the AGP bus?

    4. Re:ATI Cards by jvmatthe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not being a programmer, I can't speak with complete authority, but I can tell you what I know. The full game has an amount of textures measured in gigabytes. (Not on a single level, naturally, but this gives an idea of just how much data we're talking about.) The beta build I've played with was a bigger than 2Gb, of which a big chunk was those textures. They shipped lower resolution textures with the demo and it was still 100Mb compressed. I don't know the size of an individual, high-resolution texture, but I imagine that the S3TC/DXTC is required, given the size of things so far.

    5. Re:ATI Cards by pseudonymouse · · Score: 1
      The DRI status page says:

      " NVidia provides their own closed source, binary drivers. Hardware specs are not available to the DRI developers and NVidia cards are therefore not supported by the DRI.".

      I interpreted this to mean that the other cards are supported via open source drivers. Was I wrong? Does the DRI project just use open source code to integrate closed binaries from various companies? I was avoiding nVidia, but if Matrox and ATI are doing the same things, I might as well pick up an nVidia card and try out this Gentoo 'LiveCD'....

      --
      In a free society you are who you say you are. -- Mumford
    6. Re:ATI Cards by jvmatthe · · Score: 2

      The DRI project writes open source drivers. They do not incorporate any binary bits that I'm aware of. They provide (alpha) drivers for the Radeon 8500 and those drivers are open source. They provide binary-snapshots of the relevant driver bits that you can drop onto your machine for use with an existing XFree86 4.2 installation and appropriate kernel. These drivers do not include S3TC/DXTC and thus cannot play UT2003. This situation may change in the future. If this situation changes, then supposedly other cards like the Matrox G400 and ATI Radeon and possibly the 3dfx Voodoo3+ cards will be able to run UT2003.

      ATI has written their own binary-only drivers for the Radeon 8500 cards. These appear to be a branch of the binary-only drivers they provide for their FireGL cards, since the hardware is related. I do not believe (but also do not know) whether these drivers are based on DRI or not. They could be, since the license allows such a thing to be made. As of this writing, these drivers do not include S3TC/DXTC and thus cannot play UT2003. ATI and Epic are supposedly working together to remedy this situation and I am told that new, compatible, binary-only drivers will eventually be made available.

      Xi Graphics also provides drivers for many cards. Their updated drivers are compatible with UT2003, which makes the Radeon 8500 playable under Linux. A demo of these drivers is available (although it is limited to short periods of use after which time the X server must be restarted) for free and for the full server you must pay a fee.

      PowerVR has their own binary-only driver based on the DRI project available for their Kyro and Kyro 2 cards. As of this writing, these drivers do not include S3TC/DXTC and thus cannot play UT2003. PowerVR and Epic are supposedly working together to remedy this situation and I know that updated, compatible, binary-only drivers will eventually be made available.

      NVIDIA provides their own drivers and they run UT2003 just fine. They are, as is well-known, binary only.

      Hope that clears this all up. Most of this can be gleaned from this article on LinuxGames about UT2003.

    7. Re:ATI Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XFree86 has all the support for the Radeon that ATI are willing to let them have.
      The Gatos project USED to support TV-out on the Radeon cards, but ATI insisted that this be removed and discontinued due to patent issues. The DRI team are more than capable of coding S3TX into XFree86, but ATI insist that this breaks patents and is not allowed. If I were ATI, and if these issues were real problems (I haven't investigated if they are or not), I would provide binary-only support of those features as a plug-in to the DRI drivers. Instead, they are developing their own closed-source FireGL drivers, which from what I've read are quite slothish and not at all geared towards gaming. What's more, I'm sure the FireGL drivers will NOT work on my 64MB Radeon ViVO DDR card - I will have to buy an 8500 or 9700 to use these drivers. Instead I will buy an nVidia. I turned away from nVidia when I discovered their drivers were crap and were causing my Linux box to lock while surfing the net, but if I have to choose between ATI and nVidia, I think nVidia have it - just slightly. But things are looking pretty bad for the Open Source gamer...

  45. Re:specs? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1
    I would like to know just how fast my PC is going to have to be to be able to play the new UT and enjoy it. Please let me know

    We can't really presume to know what makes your PC happy. I will hazard a guess that either Linux or FreeBSD will make it feel free and alive. :)

    I have found that the minimum cpu specs ( 733MHz PIII or Athlon) don't make for a smooth game. A 1GHz processor is my practical minimum. Couple that with a Geforce2 or faster under Linux, under windows expand that to include Radeon 7500 or faster.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  46. UT2003 = Too much like Quake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I don't know about everyone else, but I think that the new UT looks like old UT through a Quake filter. I personally can't stand Quake, (I don't play it since I don't have ADD.) it looks too much like a cartoon. As far as FPS this fall, it's all about BF1942.

  47. No, no...its sheepshifting by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    Gentoo runs WineX (since the source is available), and there are people working on it.

    Gentoo has a different development model than most distros. There is a lot more user contribution in improving it than most; users often write code upgrades. Also, the user forums are INCREDIBLY active. So they are most likely looking to add users who already have some knowledge of Linux, but want to augment it.

    This is one compelling reason: you run Linux? Want to run Wine, but its not working for you? We've got it running - even WineX. Oh, and here's UT as well.

    Seems like a good way to get the flock to join a new fold.

    I myself switched to Gentoo because I was tired of downloading source packages under Mandrake and going through the "find and compile the library that is needed" game whenever I downloaded a program that was too new or too small to be in the distro (its considerably easier to do this type of thing with Gentoo, plus they have more packages), and adding packages that weren't part of the install was sending me into RPM oblivion.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  48. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, Windows XP is $99 for the upgrade, $150 for the full version. Second of all, this is clearly spoken by someone who doesn't run XP. Sorry bud, but you're going to have to a find new act other than "blue screening and rebooting". XP and Linux are equivalently stable.

    But hey, the truth never stops Linux zealots, right?

  49. Then female-dog to the publisher by yerricde · · Score: 1

    but when I rebooted again, none of the changes were saved to the floppy.

    Either read the documentation to find the proper way to save your changes, or complain to the game publisher that the game doesn't support saving.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  50. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have I got a treat for you....

    Exactly what treat are you referring to? That the game selection completely sucks compared to Windows? Or that he gets to run "free" games that happen to suck compared to Windows?

  51. Now if only by base3 · · Score: 1

    someone would do this for MAME with about 500 or so great games!

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    1. Re:Now if only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what if the games are copyright restricted?

    2. Re:Now if only by qurob · · Score: 1


      Do it with XMMS and 500 songs! Then we can all go to jail!!

    3. Re:Now if only by base3 · · Score: 1

      Why? Does eDonkey check for that now?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  52. Duplicate Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I just see this on Saturday?

    1. Re:Duplicate Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's reffering to the release of UT2003. This was about Gentoo's live eval cd which contains the new UT2003 demo as well as other nice features...

  53. It's been slashdotted, here it is by Lucky+Kevin · · Score: 5, Funny
    Since you can no longer get it from the site, in line with other helpful people in other discussions, I have copied the entire CD, gzipped it, uuencoded it and pasted it below. Enjoy!
    begin 664 LiveCD
    M'XL(`+[Z^SP``^R=?W`3U[7'CVR!;?P#FY`0'#`"X OQX9F6M)/^"IAU9DFUA
    M6W(E&0BA=63]P`);<B697_G10!/2 1RD!2DB:,!DZDTDFG78R+9E)_N@\INTT
    MF78F3<F4Z:3_9!A F.@U]Z8-,_VB'&=Z[YU[)6NVNHE1RH"\]'R?<W=71GN^>
    MO7 OO/5?:%0!!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1! $`1!$`1!
    M$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1 !$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!
    M$`1!$`1!$`1!$`1!$`:GRV*1#3 #B\8YO,Q7''XV8AD(9TT@\,;>O,V[K[3;U
    MF&WYUW/[:[YN! #!>;R[IE_V'_T-M+;0:^);6V_,OK\!_UL%JL;8:[L3B3H@9
    M ;VN2FZY6Y=[_*8*)FT"I6O$%PVJQ6"UVN4^V=]DM-HOEJF:#10 5H+`S@"?A,
    MHZZNP/BHZ0%37U>O+1;NZPIWA7M#7?8>J]5BE 4.66%=WM,=FZ0F#*3CD"9C8
    M?UY?D"V[30''J-OD")C\XUZO QSN8VY7/F[/TK;W5<2(^C85KO`FB4D3_[QXQ
    M!7U^3]!G"HR YG9X!C],1]/B\GWDOW_H<%1($01`$L<!49?-_&`$/>&$<MH %)
    M]\\/48BP<@A"D&'E",0A`7.P#R;8DBVWOUS^W][I_E2_R OS_ B,C_CZS,OWP7
    M_K..B>%L`SZ?T*S)_XMHI;^;]5>J5O1"-]O :`V:V?*LT+IS1PN3_MS;[)&XU
    M"]E\$T1%_&^N_R<(@B`(XM ^&T6&/:2`5-SEF4R:YSR3;-W;9-UIL_*/.)3.[
    MX^ED+&V2S ;+=)#F*?=PK;2GZRF:3Y#=)>TQ2T"3M,YD[IY/I3$<L.9>(F*2 D
    MJ7,FD>E,AU.A3'BJ<TMH>BHT/1V24E%,F,Q=VBT2[EB*Q- -AV<R4F:1)4R29
    MGLO$I].=H;E,<C*9S'2&(UB8XS,[35+8Q )?#3)GY5D>:(`B"(/YU,/#OV&'^
    M7PO#?,GE"XP'/2.!Q>#B ZYY1QZ";K9GXFM_M&G($:V$K6ZL"QWC0U^_S!6M@
    ME*\/>,8 "<I<3%L-7Y]>MEEH8GU]S^9R!6MC"U_V.K7Y/T+V5O<+6J\'EK H)!
    MON0.5,$07QKP5X&'+WF"5;"9+VUVU(";+XUM<Z-[,(*3 K1NAWQ%P&V$M7_:/
    MC3)/^!6&Q4QU(.CS^_L7@X^O!WSC?J> [%OQLK4;Q:H"OBU=OXDD@"((@"((@
    M"((@B,\9_LG_:BQJ<6 D8#/G\G^$"0R[_!_R.E"&7_S.V0E4^_V>,0E4^_V=\
    M5:QC_ L\8%VLB_V=L@:I\_L\8@&K,_QF#4(WY/V,(JC'_9WB@&O-_QF: HQOR?
    MX8;J?/[/<()1Y/^,M6`4^3_#"XOS&3[#!XMS^3_##S 4%KP:@AO)_@B`(@B`(
    M@B`(XHN&@=]CA[,`#;!=+(E[NO@=7 <VP5VR+0!+2,`<9B,,TI!M@5FR/PPRS
    MV\G>D:Z%AP`_U6?O 'X-18+EW4JQ/,HLT1)OA"<#/[-D:[B?)MB?97Z8)]HGM
    M,;: W668I0Q>$&^"1PJU6L#3#XX7;4%48TLOAFV)[BNU[+_LWSO8?9 4MQ2!C9
    M*GX;@-E&C>PM?)FI-3(3OAR#E)$)XLOL?4;8(Y9W 0:@)OB&69YG$:$YO,^P'
    M/EN2POWP(TFQO\D&.""VI]F6.;8 EC,?\*-M6IV/[F-BNL+V))YT@"((@"((@
    M"(+XMX-__K\-BP 9<VHY?\5?F_XR];)LF_P?,B@V%^3_C(?Q:?R[_9R39^GS^
    MS WB"I>F:_)^QCVU7Y?^,1Q1;>?[/>%RQ;3[_9WR3;=?-_P&S;Z/ (_P$S;J/(
    M_QD9MLSS?\8<6^;Y/V,/6^;Y/^,;;%F5_S/VLT 1?D],S#K#M!?D_XU&6Z.O9
    M/L:V4_Y/$`1!$`1!$`1!W!2^7 ?(W=@)C-8;_^A_P^Q<9#HYMN]OPL0/M'!\O
    M$N];I-YC<*#5 T)3="1;=U;R0UU]UNE<9#@JC@SGKC[-%K)0.PP((8*GX(6% S
    Damn Slashdot filters have cut this short. I'll post the other 7,343 parts later!
    --
    Kevin
    "It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in" O. Nash
    1. Re:It's been slashdotted, here it is by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 3, Funny

      No no no no! Everyone knows that you should use yEnc. Get with the times! That'll cut your posts down to only 6,421 parts!

    2. Re:It's been slashdotted, here it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... you might want to use yEnc.

  54. Re:Great.. they have a Linux version but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better question: What does MacOSX have to do with UT2003 or Linux?

    So why'd you post that?

  55. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What part of "2003" don't you understand?

  56. Linux vs Windows gaming performance by zaqattack911 · · Score: 1

    I know this topic has been touched on already. But I haven't heard anything really solid so far.

    Has anyone here actually benchmarked the UT2003 demo on linux and WindowsXP with the exact same hardware? (preferable nvidia.. since they are widely supported)

    And using the benchmark utility that's included with the demo?

    I suspect (a hunch), the difference would be not much. The overhead of the XP UI running in the background is pretty small.

    --Etan

    1. Re:Linux vs Windows gaming performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      With NVIDIAs hardware, Linux is actually faster than Windows in lower resolution and only slightly slower at 1600x1200. Quake3 benchmarks are here.

      Since UT2003 is pretty CPU intensive game, I would except that Linux will be faster than Windows XP. However this only applies to NVIDIAs hardware. Other GPU manufacturers haven't released decent Linux drivers.

    2. Re:Linux vs Windows gaming performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone does do a benchmark, it should be done with OpenGL on both platforms. Epic's OpenGL renderer came as an afterthought, so it's more than likely not going to perform as well as the D3D renderer.

  57. How is this off topic? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    This post is precisely ontopic. We're talking about run-off-the-disc Linux distros in this thread. If someone posts a link with information about another such tool for accomplishing this, it's informative. Maybe some people out there want to do something similar, but without using Gentoo.

    Moderators, try using some objectivity! Sheesh.

    --
    Why bother.
  58. a live CD is... by iplayfast · · Score: 2

    A cd that you can pop into your computer, which will boot Linux without actually installing it onto your hard disk.

    (Some people were wondering)

  59. Re:specs? by Czernobog · · Score: 1

    So I suppose us folks running AMD k6-2 500 with 192MB SDRAM and Caldera 2.3 (no updates, can't be bothered, isn't 2.2.14 a beauty?) are going to find it a bit heavy...

    --
    /. Where the truth
  60. KNOPPIX by jbolden · · Score: 2

    Not to begrudge Gentoo (an excellent distribution IMHO) anything I figure I'd mention a full featured (takes up the whole CD) live CD distribution which offers a good generalized suite of applications: office, technical, programming, game, educational... called KNOPPIX. It works really well as a demo and is even quite usable as a portable linux for regular use.

  61. Doesn't work for me by samrolken · · Score: 1

    I have an Athlon Tbird at 1.4Ghz, 512MB of RAM, and a Geforce 2 MX 200 with 64MB, 2x AGP. After booting up, logging in, and doing "x-setup", it says, "no screens found". Anyone else with this problem?

    --
    samrolken
    1. Re:Doesn't work for me by psypete · · Score: 1

      head over to irc.openprojects.net channel #gentoo and ask away. i'm sure it's a very simple fix. and if you could supply more information, we'd all appreciate more of the error (maybe it's in /var/log/XFree86.0.log ?

    2. Re:Doesn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am on a 333 mhz celeron, with a Geforce2mx400, and it runs fine for me, I popped the cd in, and I was running a GUI, truly amazing

    3. Re:Doesn't work for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Geforce 2MX 400 and I have the same problem.

    4. Re:Doesn't work for me by texaport · · Score: 1

      I guess my 24MB Dreamcast running Doom isn't so bad after all -- and I get the ability to Telnet anywhere as root with no password...

  62. PC "Consoles"? by Vireo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I find interesting is the possibility to offer games that come with their own OS. Instead of distributing a game which comes for Windows, Linux, or MacOS, why not put an optimized OS on the CD or DVD so that anyone can boot it and play the game. The game could fetch configs and saved games, if available, on a user-specified location on disk, or better, online. It would work much as a console; of course, having to boot on the CD is a drawback, but console users don't seem to mind.

    1. Re:PC "Consoles"? by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like this idea, but no one really wants to go back to the days of coding for a particular piece of hardware. HAL's and API's have made things easier, and I don't think anyone who hasn't already gone over to the console side of the business really wants to shove their arms back into that particular cow's ass.

      Besides, you'd have to deal with driver updates (since some drivers provide better performance, you'd better believe I want to use those) as well as providing support for hardware released after the game (Quake III had damn well better be able to run on my GF4!)

      It's a cool idea, but not very workable anymore. Back in the day where it was VESA/Soundblaster, this was workable (didn't games used to come like this?) Nowadays, I don't see how it could work except for a very specific config.

      I'll give this the benefit of a doubt though, and despite being a Windows user, I'll download the ISO and compare performance.

    2. Re:PC "Consoles"? by eggnet · · Score: 1

      People don't spend a grand on a single-tasking machine. The going rate for that is about $150-200 (US).

    3. Re:PC "Consoles"? by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Instead of distributing a game which comes for Windows, Linux, or MacOS, why not put an optimized OS on the CD or DVD so that anyone can boot it and play the game.

      I see a major problem with different hardware combinations. I suppose you could build in everything as a module, but then it is hardly optimized. If we all had the same CPU, chipset, GPU, sound card, it would be easy. But then, we'd all might as well be running X-Boxes.

      However, it is still an interesting idea. I have never used an X-Box, but do you actually have to "install" games? Or can you just buy a game, pop in the disc and play immediately?

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    4. Re:PC "Consoles"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never used an X-Box, but do you actually have to "install" games? Or can you just buy a game, pop in the disc and play immediately?

      Just hit the power button, and pop a disc in. Zero to Halo in 5 seconds.

  63. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the comment a few posts up about people saying linux is just catching up with windows isn't exactly true. here windows is just catching up with linux. and i don't believe you when you say it's just as stable...and yes i've used it.

  64. something else by jbolden · · Score: 2

    The only way this happens is a game which requires network transparency. Right now the window's world is using thick clients but a very thin client game meant to be run over a lan...

  65. So this things plays UT2003 w/o installing linux? by n2dasun · · Score: 1

    Maybe its time for a little petitioning. If we can get developers to make games for linux, they can be run from cd's like this on any computer, no matter what the native os is on the computer itself, since it wont overwrite anything. this would make everyone happy(everyone that matters, anyway). Who do I send a letter to?

    --
    I'm determined to reclaim my karma. Now, if I can only find a groundbreaking article and something witty to say....
  66. Actual Retail/OEM Pricing... by cnelzie · · Score: 1


    Windows XP Home Edition Upgrade $99.99

    Windows XP Home Edition OEM (Full) $129.99

    Windows XP Home Edition Retail Box $199.99

    Windows XP Pro Upgrade $199.99

    Windows XP Pro OEM (Full) $189.99

    Windows XP Pro Retial Box $499.99

    Those either prices? From the Internet? From Uncle Joe's White Van Corner Computer Stop(On a different street corner every hour!)? From one of those "Computer Shows" where half the items are junk, pirated, stolen and all sold by Fly-by-night operations?

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Actual Retail/OEM Pricing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, let's see...

      Amazon is $159.00 for the full XP Home.

      Hell, these guys will sell you the OEM version for $99. XP Pro Full is like $269. XP Pro OEM is $165. (I've ordered from these guys, by the way, they're not a "fly by night").

      It ain't difficult to find XP at a discount.

  67. Re:So this things plays UT2003 w/o installing linu by n2dasun · · Score: 1

    This would also convince "other"(ahem) video card manufacturers to stay on top of their linux driver releases.

    --
    I'm determined to reclaim my karma. Now, if I can only find a groundbreaking article and something witty to say....
  68. Nice idea unless you're a hard drive manufacturer by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    Most of my hard drive is dedicated to games. The same games that would probably run alright from my 46X CD-ROM drive, but they insist on taking up precious gigs of my hard drive anyway. I always wondered, if gaming consoles can run off of CD fine, why can't PCs?

    Thanks for answering my question Gentoo. Now how about a full verstion of UT 2003? And where is MS with an LiveWindows for those that are still too afraid to program in Linux?

  69. Re:Michael: The Next Jon Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i agree. michael is a teabag.

  70. Mirror Anyone? by TheCritic · · Score: 1

    Is there a Mirror of the ISO?

  71. Xbox and PS2 hard drives don't cut it by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The XBOX has a "hard drive."

    It's much easier to carry a memory card or floppy disk from one location to another than it is to lug a whole Xbox console. No, don't say "remove the hard drive and put it in another machine" because each hard drive is keyed to an individual Xbox system through ATA authentication.

    PS2 has a hard drive too. You can get it as part of the "Linux" kit.

    The Linux kit for PlayStation 2 needs a blank memory card to store the kernel, so you're not saving any money. In addition, PS2 games can't use a memory card or hard drive formatted for Linux.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Xbox and PS2 hard drives don't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux kit for PlayStation 2 [playstation.com] needs a blank memory card to store the kernel, so you're not saving any money. In addition, PS2 games can't use a memory card or hard drive formatted for Linux.

      It sux that the PS2 Linux kit is more or less useless for games. However, you can get it to work with games if you can find the HDD Utility Disc (currently only available in Japan w/ the consumer PS2 HD). Basically if you can get your hands on the Utility disc (I assume it'll be the same disc available whenever the consumer HD is available outside Japan), you can format your HD for games, then install linux. A person detailed the exact procedure on the playstation2-linux.com forums, but it was a while ago and I haven't found the thread.

      Also, PS2 games can use a memory card that was "formatted" for Linux. All the linux kit does is blank out the card and put a kernel image on it. Granted, if you only have one card then you're SOL. But if you can copy your card data to another card then you can just copy it back after you format it for linux.

  72. Re:So this things plays UT2003 w/o installing linu by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    That's a cool idea. Use Linux to boot into off the CD and auto-detect what it needs.

    The downside is that us Win2k/NT (and presumably Linux) users are used to having their machine up all the time.

    However, I'd be happy to dedicate an OS-less machine just to gaming.

  73. More important than UT is... by DigitalAdrenaline · · Score: 1

    They finally have vi on the install CD. nano irritates me. Kev.

  74. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does a M$ solution cost

    WAY less than my time -- and this is coming from someone who uses Linux every day ... along with Windows XP. I use Linux when I need a server, and XP when I need user applications.

  75. It's useful for two reasons. by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

    First of all, the Linux version has been said to offer better FPS, because you don't Windows eating all your ram. Secondly, this kind of thing is REALLY useful when you're trying to set up a LAN. Instead of someone being the "Linux Bitch" and having to install Linux on their PC so that the Dedicated server will run fast, this allows people to just insert a CD and boot up their brand new dedicated server while the others hook up their computers.

  76. Re:Were is my pointy-horned cap? QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No he is talking about sucking his dick. It's all a big secret code, you see.

  77. Fun and Games at a University by ecliptik · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Burn 10 CDs

    Step 2: Go to University Library where they have decent enough machines and Nvidia Cards

    Step 3: Insert discs and reboot

    Step 4: Spontaneous LAN party among book weary students!

  78. Didn't work by Xenolith · · Score: 1

    On my SS51, it couldn't initialize the USB2.0 ports and running x-setup resulted in a bunch of wingding ascii characters.

    --

    Journal
  79. Infocom by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, that's exactly how the original Infocom games (the ones that shipped on 5.25" floppies) worked!

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  80. Thank you VERY much :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inane babble here...

  81. Hrmmm... Just the reason I looked for a mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I kinda figured that would happen. :(
    Hope it smoothes out soon enough for ya!
    (btw.. that was QUITE rude ./)

  82. A CD that boots Windows.. by big_groo · · Score: 1

    ...and showcases a game WITHOUT the need for installing the OS?

    Sure.

    Click here.

    .

    1. Re:A CD that boots Windows.. by Shamanin · · Score: 1

      ...that is FREE!

      --
      come on fhqwhgads
  83. Sims is ported... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily, the Sims is ported to Linux. Obviously the Zealot just didn't have the CD in his collection. :-)

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people are, or so it seems! I'm no zealot, but I am an advocate of using Linux.

    The other side, if you must, claims that Linux is defficient because it can't play games - how many geeks say they'd use it if it played games?

    Welp, this IS exciting for us advocates, because here is a method for running UT easier than on Windows systems...

    Remember, Windows XP is the least feature rich, and least sophisticated, and least secure major OS out there at this point...

    Yeah, there's the whole "Betamax vs VHS" analogy - but, what's the other side to that analogy? It is that the avarage consumer lost out on a movie format that was of a higher quality and yet more compact than what we all ended up getting. Mute now, becaues DVD is the way to go, so this time, let's not get stuck with VHS in the interim...

    Games on linux, in an easy manner, is a step towards that, IMO.

  86. HTTP Mirror by trawg · · Score: 1

    http://files.ausgamers.com/?agn=details&id=333 2

    1. Re:HTTP Mirror by trawg · · Score: 1

      Uh, for some reason it put an extraneous space in the URL; the id number is supposed to be 3332

  87. Unreal 2003 by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    There is a black eye for Linux. Was I the only person that was so grossly dissapointed with Unreal 2003 that I curled up in a ball and wept like a small child? Why bring up this association between UT 2003 and Linux, it will only harm Linux's reputation. Great I can see the headline now, "Yet Another Crappy Title Runs on Linux." If you want to impress people tell them there is a Linux version of Battlefield 1945 and then watch M$ weep.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  88. Subst Knoppix for Gentoo... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    Knoppix is Da Thang for bootable live-cd linux!!

    http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  89. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, XP (at work) bluescreened and rebooted on me just the other day.

  90. Re:WOW! QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, Linux froze on me yesterday. [and I'm not lying for effect]. It does it every now and then, and I have no idea why.

  91. 219 megabytes... by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

    I've seen 220 megabyte Mlnl CDs out there.

    Anyone else notice this little detail? :-)

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    1. Re:219 megabytes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 5 pack of mini cds and I'll test it soon as the dl finishes.