Slashdot Mirror


Enterprise Season Premiere Tonight

l0key432 writes "Enterprise, Star Trek's fifth series, begins its second season on UPN tonight at 8pm/7pm central with the episode Shockwave Part II, airing just before the series premier of the new 'The Twilight Zone' show at 9pm/8pm central. Shockwave II is the conclusion to last season's season-ending cliff-hanger, and additional info can be found at this page(possible spoilers!) on StarTrek.com." Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.

383 comments

  1. First season was lame, but TNG's was lamer. by Typingsux · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And I'm very happy how TNG came around. As a matter of fact, on TNN at 11PM EDT "Best of both worlds" is on. It seems like I'll have a TV night for once.

    --
    The above post is an editorial, the poster cannot and will not be held responsible for all or in part for it's contents
    1. Re:First season was lame, but TNG's was lamer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you idiot. TNG happenned in the future. Newer tech, cooler, better. This freaking so called "Enterprise" is outdated. Then what else is there to watch in a trek movie? Must be acting! If I want a trek movie, I want to see the the techs! I hope this show die soon.

    2. Re:First season was lame, but TNG's was lamer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! The transient phase indused optical power coupler shorted out the negative ion plasma distributor in the mega hyper warp module!

      In scottish: It canno' go any faster!

      You're the kind of person who enjoys StarTrek's over done (and not too well thought out) holodeck, time travel, and intrapersonal (I swear, I don't give a shit if some virus causes Tuvok to hulicinate--what was my point again?) episodes, aren't you? I hope a plague wipes people like you out. Really.

    3. Re:First season was lame, but TNG's was lamer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Oh no! The transient phase indused optical power coupler shorted out the negative ion plasma distributor in the mega hyper warp module!

      >> In scottish: It canno' go any faster!

      "Oh no! The Eludium Q36 Explosive Space Modula-TOR is missing!"

      "That creature has taken the Space Modula-TOR!"

      "Now I shall have to create more Martians!"

      Shoulda had Marvin on the Enterprise instead of that damn robot! HYMIE would have made a better robot!

    4. Re:First season was lame, but TNG's was lamer. by MATTtheROGUE · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah, I remember 1st season TNG. But the 1st season of
      • enterprise
      want that bad! i mean, at least they introduced the ferengi as creathures that do more then duck and weave and twiddle there arms (like twiddling your thumbs, but using whole arm). It really was good
  2. Vulcan luvin... by override11 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully something tragic will happen and they will have to enter the decontamination room and spread goo on each other again!!!!

    --
    No I didnt spell check this post...
    1. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Psmylie · · Score: 5, Funny

      What would be even better is if they had Seven of Nine do some kinda time warp thing and she can be in the decontamination room with the vulcan chick and they can be spreading goo on each other and and Troi could be there too and for some reason the blue chick from Farscape and ... urgh..

      *GASP!*

      *INHALE!*

      *EXHALE!*

      Whew, just had a little ubergeek hyperventilation there.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    2. Re:Vulcan luvin... by FigBugDeux · · Score: 1

      You need more than getting to see hoshi's boobs?

    3. Re:Vulcan luvin... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Hopefully something tragic will happen and they will have to enter the decontamination room and spread goo on each other again!!!!

      That Vulcan is one skanky girl. The translator is cute, tho'.

      Not that I've got anything against Vulcans, I liked Spock's apprentice in the one where Kirk and Bones get exiled to the prison planet. I am amazed that Kirk never made a move on her, maybe that bit ended up on the cutting room floor.

    4. Re:Vulcan luvin... by iamsure · · Score: 3, Funny

      How in the name of geekdom could you leave Skully out of that?

    5. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Scutter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I liked Spock's apprentice in the one where Kirk and Bones get exiled to the prison planet.

      That's Kim Catrall, baby! She was a hottie until she started doing "Sex and the City". Now she's just annoying and old-looking. Ahh, how I miss the "Mannequin" and "Big Trouble in Little China" days... *sigh*

      Oh, geez, I almost forgot Porky's! w00t!

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    6. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ubergeek? You mean "pathetic geek". And if you don't know where the umlaut is on your keyboard map try "uebergeek" - it's the correct anglicized spelling.

    7. Re:Vulcan luvin... by colwuk · · Score: 1

      when did we manage that?!

    8. Re:Vulcan luvin... by nayrbmai · · Score: 1

      Crap... With the way the UPN affiliates in Joplin, MO handle things, I'll probably have a service interruption during those "peak" moments...

    9. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

      We probably won't get to see them; I think she's just posing for Holding Your Own Boobs Magazine.

    10. Re:Vulcan luvin... by tweek · · Score: 1

      I am David Lopan.

      Bring me the girl with the green eyes!

      hehe. Is that out on dvd? I need to own that one for my occasional fix.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    11. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get any "goo" on you? Check your ear lobe...

    12. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Here in Memphis there will probably be a thunderstorm about 80 miles away that UPN will have to cover intently for the last 12 minutes of the episode. It happened last season.

      Thank God for Kazaa, I got to see the end the following night...

    13. Re:Vulcan luvin... by ethereal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      SNL: "Just Hands, and Boobs".

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    14. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Doom+Ihl'+Varia · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's out on DVD. John Carpenter is god.

    15. Re:Vulcan luvin... by GraZZ · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the decontamination room, but if you watch the 30 second promotional clip it looks like Hoshi gets to show a LOT more skin than we've seen so far :)

      She's way hotter than the silly Vulcan anyhow...

    16. Re:Vulcan luvin... by FigBugDeux · · Score: 1

      tonight!!!

    17. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Psmylie · · Score: 2

      How in the name of geekdom could you leave Skully out of that?
      Ran outta breath, sorry ;)

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    18. Re:Vulcan luvin... by nytes · · Score: 1

      About 2 seconds after Hoshi's moment, we see a clip of Trip having an orgasm.

      I'm not sure I needed to see that.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    19. Re:Vulcan luvin... by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      C'mon Dave, 2000 years and no one yet has fit the bill?

    20. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

      Troi? Oh no! You really ruined it for me! There is nothing at all sexy about Troi. In fact, she has great "limpening powers" if you know what I mean. I'll agree with you about Seven of Nine. I'm still not convinced by the Vulcan chick--she seems like a shallow Seven-of-Nine wannabe.... sofar. But she's no Troi. She doesn't yet cause me to scream when she opens her mouth.

    21. Re:Vulcan luvin... by Psmylie · · Score: 2

      Funny that you have a problem with Troi, but not with "the blue chick from Farscape" ;)

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    22. Re:Vulcan luvin... by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      Stop your blasphemy, or I will send you to the "hell of the upside-down sinners"!!

      (grin)

      "...the blackest of magic - my soul swims in it..."

      "..to the armys and the navy and the battle's they have won - to the red, white, and blue - the colors that never run...may the wings of liberty never lose a feather"

      "...and rule the universe from beyond the grave...or check into the Psycho ward - whichever comes first, eh, Lo Pan?"

      or, my favorite:

      "...the Ram butts his head against the edge, and his horns become...entangled..."

      I think someone needs to do a sequel to that classic film...something like "Jack Burton & The Warriors of the Black Blood of the Earth" or something like that. Get "Egg Shen" and the rest of the cast together(minus Kim Catrell, because she's so friggin' stuck-up with her "Softcore-Porn-in-the-City" series that she's got tunnel-vision) and take it to the next level...eh?

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
  3. Bah by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Troll

    Forget preempted, around here you need that fancy digital cable thingy to even get the channel its on.
    And digital cable sux0r oh so very much : (

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Bah by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2

      Taco, the Detroit Red Wings haven't even started pre-season yet, so you don't have to worry about the show being pre-empted on UPN 50 out of Detroit.

    2. Re:Bah by Bob+C.+Cock · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think you need to worry about missing it due to a sporting event for 2 reasons.
      1) UPN doesn't broadcast sporting events. (Yes I'm aware they broadcast Pro Wrestling but that doesn't count.)
      2) The only compelling sporting event on tonight is the A's Vs. Angels game which is being broadcast on ESPN.

      So if you're a baseball fan, get some dual screen action going and watch both. I myself am going to be at the game so gonna miss Enterprise.

    3. Re:Bah by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2

      UPN 50 out of Detroit broadcasts approximately 30 Detroit Red Wings games annually.

    4. Re:Bah by AndyL · · Score: 2
      Doesn't broadcast sporting evnets? Are you kidding?

      My Local UPN affiliate always, without fail, shows a hockey game in Star Trek's time-slot.

      Now, I'm not a hockey fan, but I'm pretty sure the hockey season hasn't started yet. However, I do not belive this will stop UPN from withholding Star Trek from me. I have confidence that they will find a way to somehow broadcast hockey instead of Star Trek.

    5. Re:Bah by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 0

      The sports problem tends to be a local thing. Here it's fscking college basketball on Wednesday nights. Damnit, I'm an alumnist, who do I complain to?

    6. Re:Bah by captaincucumber · · Score: 1
      when I lived in minnesota, star trek episodes were frequently pre-empted by minnesota fscking Timberwolves games

      You probably live in Nevada or something where there isn't a professional team within a few thousand miles.

  4. And this is Stuff that matters ? by bushboy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, well it may be airing if your in a certain part of the world, but for everywhere else in the world, it's not.

    Oh - but wait - I forgot ! - 99.9% of /. readers are from North America !

    Silly me...

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by Party+Remover · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Your" right! How typically arrogant and imperialist of us. As Americans, we must be especially conscious of our status as the lone superpower and make efforts to avoid imposing announcements about our TV schedule on other cultures.

    2. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by C_nemo · · Score: 2, Informative

      im not from north-america(scandinavia actually), but i enjoy the bad acting of any star trek show( + TNG is pretty cool too). file swapping /capping/ripping/wathever will enable me to watch this episode in less than a week. so, yes, this is stuff that matters

    3. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aww, jealous?

    4. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are always the nice and friendly people that rip tv-shows for us in other parts of the world :)
      Big thanks to them!

    5. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      well I am, at least! ;-)

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    6. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic, I've already watched it, it's been available for download for hours now. ;-)
      Without giving anything away I'll just remind everyone that Hoshi Sato is really cute, especially topless. A pity she got a shirt from Malcolm so quickly.

    7. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by hatchet · · Score: 1

      Actually we will get full episode from internet. Producers from many series said that it's fine with them for episodes to spread via internet.

      I know for sure producers of Southpark and Stargate SG-1 said it's ok for episodes to be availbile on the net. I'm sure it's same for Farscape too. (do you really think they would air this in slovenia?) But heck.. i watched all episodes that i downloaded from internet (we have good and quite cheap connections here) and i'm a supporter, a fan.. or an addict if you like.
      Can producers loose money because of me? Absolutely not.. if I wouldn't get it from internet i couldn't watch it and I couldn't do a shit about it.
      Can they profit? In fact, they can... if we get critical mass of local fans.. maybe local TV stations will see series as popular ones and buy rights to air it.

    8. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by jareth780 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event."

      [Nerd#1] Is that true?
      [Nerd#2] Let's get 'em!
      [Nerds] (nerdy growling)
      [Football player] Let's get out of here!
      [Nerds] (more nerdy growling, chase football team off field)

    9. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      Can producers loose money because of me?

      No, they are usually "tight" with their money, not "loose" with it. :-)

      Back to the topic, free copies (or at least easily distributable ones) got MS on top, and some recording artists (as well as Linux providers) see the wisdom in getting your show/music/product out there and popular. It's an old and successful tactic, I'm glad to see some producers using it. It's really good for _us_, the end user.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    10. Re:And this is Stuff that matters ? by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You, sir, just made my day. I am in your debt. Funny stuff, that.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  5. Donkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone put it in the donkey network and post the link here?

  6. Funny... by Adnans · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Just finished watching 2x01! Satellite feeds rock! :-)

    -adnans

    --
    "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
  7. Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by swein515 · · Score: 1

    Aside from the "get a life" fanboy/girls at trekbbs.com, does anyone really care about this show? Or find it remotely interesting? I dunno, I watch the occasional episode, and it just doesn't go anywhere. It all feels too calculated. Maybe season 2 will be better.

    1. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by spagma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It takes some time for them to work into a groove. I didn't think last season was bad at all, and I am looking forward to each episode this season. Its definitely worth a watch.

      --
      If it won't boot, Fsck it!
    2. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Aside from the "get a life" fanboy/girls at trekbbs.com, does anyone really care about this show? Or find it remotely interesting? I dunno, I watch the occasional episode, and it just doesn't go anywhere. It all feels too calculated. Maybe season 2 will be better.

      And the obvious comment--and I know this will tag me as a troll--is "How can geeks possibly stand *any* of the Star Trek shows?" We're talking about people who go ballistic because AMD is not longer stamping MHz values on processors, and these people like B-quality shows with bad acting and ridiculous science at every turn?

    3. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by smd4985 · · Score: 1

      i like enterprise. then again, i'm a sucker for anything that takes place on a spaceship. as bad as you may think it is, at least it isn't a reality show. THOSE are the worst....

      --
      smd4985
    4. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by C0LDFusion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's not about anything anymore except for the hot alien chicks.

      --
      Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
    5. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by FyRE666 · · Score: 0, Troll

      100% agree. Right from the title music I just knew it'd be crap. I gave it a chance, and watched twice, but I realized I honestly couldn't care less about any of the characters, the technology, or the plot. Which doesn't leave much.

      At least Voyager had Jeri Ryan as eye-candy...

    6. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you like Pigs in Space.

      PIiiiiiiggsss in Spaaaaaace.

    7. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. I could not care less about it. Star Trek is dead -- they're just going through the motions. What's really pathetic is that there are enough zombie fan boys to actually watch this trash.

    8. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by jasonditz · · Score: 1
      I'm a hopeless fanboy, and even I agree with you. Its been all downhill since Roddenberry died.

      Enterprise lost me the minute they introduced the villanous "Saliban".

    9. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the inevitable sequel series...

      Tuuuuuxxxxxx in Spaaaacccceeeeee!

      In which Tux looks for a legendary planet of Herring for him and his people.

    10. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... Hi.. i'm an idiot.. i like star trek and it's all i talk about.. duh.

    11. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by NetFu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know, maybe I'm the only one who feels this way, but "Enterprise" is the first Star Trek series since the original '60s series that was really consistently interesting. TNG and it's many spinoffs were, for the most part, boring, politically-correct, pieces of crap. Not that all episodes were terrible, but I've avoided seeing WHOLE SEASONS of TNG because so many of the episodes became so boring, and I don't really care if I ever do see them. On the other hand, I've seen each of the original series' episodes at least 10 times.

      Maybe the fact that "Enterprise" was intended to recapture the action and humor style of the original series and thats why it appeals to people like me (I generally see people who liked TNG dislike "Enterprise"). Or maybe the episodes are more like real science fiction and not just intended to expand the audience to people who'd rather watch "Friends"...

    12. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by operagost · · Score: 1
      Hoshi.
      T'Pal.

      'nuff said.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by bhawbaker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      what's trash to you is treasure to others

    14. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by nayrbmai · · Score: 1

      I'll 2nd that... Too bad Hoshi already got laid though....

    15. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because hollywood is hollywood -- it's unlikely we'll ever encounter a series/movie that actually stands up to /. style scrutiny.

    16. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I generally see people who liked TNG dislike "Enterprise"

      I thought most of us disliked DS9..

    17. Re:Enterprise is boring, sorry it has to be said. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      perhaps its because AMD is producing real chips, and Star Trek is fiction?

      by your logic, geek should not like Star Wars(the first one).

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Well aleast you get UPN by mokapa · · Score: 1

    I don't even get UPN. :(

    --
    What was that I just dra...
    1. Re:Well aleast you get UPN by Boone^ · · Score: 2

      The local fox station here carries some UPN programming, so basically I get to wait until Saturday at 5 to view the Premiere. :/

    2. Re:Well aleast you get UPN by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Carefull! You'll get moded -1 troll for comments like that! (I did) ;- )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  9. Re:Enterprise sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can't be worse than DS9, can it ?

  10. Rick Berman is the Lorne Michaels of Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ever notice how sometimes an executive producer (like Lorne Michaels of Saturday Night Live) gets a job and then never leaves?

    Wouldn't it do some good for the franchise for some change? Whether you like Rick Berman and Brannon Bragga or not, a new perspective would be nice...

  11. Tonight? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It was on last night (Sep 17, 2002) at 10pm EST (GMT-4) in Canada...

    So if you haven't seen it, someone else here probably has. So you don't want to read on if you want to avoid spoilers.

    So essentially ... SPOILER ALERT(!!) for this whole story.

    1. Re:Tonight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EST is GMT-5

    2. Re:Tonight? by GrBear · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was on WSBK last night too, which is a US station, and a UPN affiliate. In Canada, I counted it being on three different channels, an hour apart from each other.. 7pm MST, 8pm MST and 9 MST.

    3. Re:Tonight? by MrNixon · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in DST, because GMT doesn't move.

    4. Re:Tonight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? The Lone Gunmen are dead? WTF! I was going
      to watch that episode. Wait till I get my hands
      on chrisd...

  12. thanks, by Sarin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the television stations in my country haven't even made effort to air the first season this year,
    I'll keep an eye out for it on alt.binaries.multimedia.startrek and alt.binaries.startrek , thanks to the people there I've been able to follow the first season.

    1. Re:thanks, by bogie · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Don't waste your bandwidth. Enterprise is just an embarrassment. The acting is terrible. Imagine every character being as bad an actor as Janeway and you have the Enterprise cast.

      BTW this is coming from someone who watched and for the most part enjoyed every Star Trek season before Enterprise. Enterprise is complete crap and for the first time I have no new watchable Star Trek.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:thanks, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait?

      Mods: Have you really paid attention to the show? It's almost like Scott Bakula is doing his best Captain Kirk impersonation!

    3. Re:thanks, by goldorak_dan · · Score: 1

      FYI, It's already starting to show up.

  13. Already saw it by Franco_Begbie · · Score: 1

    It aired last night on an independant station in Calgary, Alberta, Canada last night at 8pm MT. Pretty decent start to a new season IMHO.

  14. Old news ;) by BagOBones · · Score: 1

    It was on last night on one of the local networks.. Time cops are the worst thing ever added to the ST universe.
    Clearly the new focuse of Enterprise is sex. Then again Kirk was always making out with aliens.. O well.

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:Old news ;) by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Maybe the sex drive of Star Trek captains decreases as the civilization advances... :-p

    2. Re:Old news ;) by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      I like the time travel plots, as well as the time cop idea. probably cause I've always been interested in time travel. I know 90% of the plots would end up causing a paradox, but I still find them fun to watch. I agree with what most people on the holodeck, why are they allowed to create holo-people knowing that if they find out they are not human they become alive?? as for the overacting and impulsive behavior of the crew I think they got the idea from ST:TOS as the crew was also out-spoken but not as much, showing that people humans became more and more tame as time goes on enterprise-TOS-TNG-DP9-voyager. They could have gotten a lot better person for the captain then Scott bakula, horrible actor , I keep hoping he'll "quantum leap" his ass out of their ;)

    3. Re:Old news ;) by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      There are only 3 Time travel plots I have enjoyed.. 1) ST the voyage home 2) STNG: The one where Datas head falls off 3)STNG: First Contact
      There where a few others that where not bad but for the most part the plots seem to be work arounds for killing the crew or srewing up and having no problem bringing them back or fixing the problem.
      There was NO NEED to ANY time travel in Enterprise.. unless they did it by accident by flying around a star really fast ;)

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    4. Re:Old news ;) by strangemoose · · Score: 1

      You'll call me crazy, But I like the Time travel plot in the Voyager Finale, all teh Borg are DEAD! w00t.
      I have that episode on VCD somewhere...
      /me goes to watch ;)

      --
      Sig? What sig?
  15. upn by jfinke · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize that upn carried sports... And the way that they having been hyping this, there is no way that it would happen. Are we bitter about someting?

    1. Re:upn by cdh · · Score: 1

      You do realize that many UPN stations carry local sports, right? Ditto with "big three" stations. For example, on Sunday, Sep. 29, the day of the season premier of Alias, our local ABC station will instead show the Vikings/Seahawks game. They'll rebroadcast Alias at 11:30pm. Of course, I'd probably watch the Vikes anyway, but it's not just "smaller" UPN stations that do this.

    2. Re:upn by jfinke · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I don't recall ours doing that... But, maybe it is just I am never interested in the sports that they are showing.. :D However, we do have a local "sports" station. So, ... that may be the reason. However, I seriously doubt that anyone will preempt it for anything except war with as much buildup and advertising they are doing. Unless that that is just in my area.

  16. Yay already found it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get it here:
    ed2k://|file|Enterprise_S02E01_Shockwave_Pa rt II.FTV.ShareReactor.mpg|436287384|3587476d43bea9ac a5bb0b5629da6653|

  17. Hmmmm all you unlucky Yanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if you were fortunate enough to live in Canada, then you would have seen it last night.

    It was good, VERY good. At least I liked it.

    Have fun, I promise not to give anything away here. (Other than the obvious, that they "get out of it" in the end)

  18. The comercial trailer sold me... by Kith_Me · · Score: 1

    If you watch the trailer you see dupall(?) in bed with man, he looks vulcan. But aside from that point, I am curiouse how they are gonig to deal with the whole "Archer Stuck Deep into the futur" problem.

    I'm sure if they re-calirbrate the pulse-ION beam into a phase shifted Proton scan they can grab him... Hehehe, God I love that show.

    --
    "CPU's Don't make mistakes....They just miss a few cycles sometimes..."
    1. Re:The comercial trailer sold me... by tenchin · · Score: 1

      Actually I think that the tachyon stuff is the proper aproach, but do they equipment to emit those type of particles? maybe thaey will be going to steal it from the sulliban? how knows, this stuff is really cool

  19. THE LONE GUNMEN ARE DEAD by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    I mean they are going to be in this episode. I'll be watching with a beer in hand and wishing I had a TIVO. I'm sure they are going to *stuff* the breaks w/ commercials.

    I feel bad for those New Yorkers who won't be able to record it. :(

    1. Re:THE LONE GUNMEN ARE DEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why won't New Yorkers be able to record it?

  20. doesn't cut the mustard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always liked Star Trek, but I don't like Enterprize. The original series and The Next Generation had something in comon - each eppisode had some kind of philosopherical and interlectual point to ponder in it. The eppisodes were clever and subtle.
    This new Enterprize isn't like that. It's part of the mod scene, which means brash, sleezly, violent, and mainly concerned with chest thumping. It's more like rebranded WWF than the Star Trek of old.

  21. Captain Jonathan Archer is Dead by techstar25 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's already been broadcast in the east coast.
    Sorry about the spoiler.
    ;-) just having a little fun.

  22. Time to dig out the P2P apps by EkiM+in+De · · Score: 1

    Well it's that time of year; time to dust off the P2P applications and try and hunt down a copy of the show before I leave for work.

    Over on this part of the great pond Enterprise is not showing on TV, so this is the only way I can get my fix.
    Note to Self: must get to the shops and buy some CD-Rs.

    --
    Patriotism is the opium of the masses
    1. Re:Time to dig out the P2P apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enterprise season 1 is currently showing in the UK on Sundays at around 1830 on CHannel 4.

  23. A question.. by unorthod0x · · Score: 0, Troll

    A question for those that have already seen it: Does it have the same horrific opening theme song?

    1. Re:A question.. by Adnans · · Score: 2

      Sadly yes, they didn't change the theme song. But it's starting to grow on me.

      -adnans

      --
      "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:A question.. by MrAl · · Score: 1

      I was in a restaurant the other day and whatever station they were playing in the background was playing the theme song. Strangely, taken out of the context of being a theme song for a Star Trek series (which I thought was really blasphemous) the song was pretty good.

      From that point on I've changed my opinion of the opening song - it's pretty good and certainly a nice change from the status quo formula that has made up much of the Star Trek universe (writing, plots, dialog, etc.).

    3. Re:A question.. by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1
      Sadly yes, they didn't change the theme song. But it's starting to grow on me.

      I knew it! I just knew it!

      It's not a song at all! It's some sort of musical fungus! Quick! Everyone, use your Mute buttons! Fast forward, if you can, while you still can!
      --
      The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
    4. Re:A question.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "A question for those that have already seen it: Does it have the same horrific opening theme ?

      Well I don't know about you guys, but I feel like going apeshit when a show has a song I don't like. Without a good song, that show sucks! I also don't buy books without illustrations on the cover. :P

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:A question.. by Schnapple · · Score: 2
      I was in a restaurant the other day and whatever station they were playing in the background was playing the theme song
      And now for the obligatory history of "Faith of the Heart".

      Every time I walk into Albertson's I hear it, too - but it's not Russell Watson that's singing it. Probably wasn't him singing it when you heard it, either - it was probably Rod Stewart.

      The story (as I follow it) is this - the song was written by Dianne Warren. She's famous for the big, boisterous, overdone theme song from movies. "I Don't Want To Miss A Thing", "My Heart Will Go On" - all hers. She was commissioned to write a song for the movie Patch Adams, so she writes "Faith of the Heart", and they get Rod Stewart to record it.

      Thing is, the producers for whatever reason decide it's not good enough to be in the movie (doesn't really fit) and so they relegate it to the end credits (and I don't think it was the first song in the end credits, either.

      So when the producers of Enterprise need a song, they want a "big" song for the opener, seeing as how they've decided to deviate from the "Whoosh!" formula of shows past. They figure out that there's a potential Dianne Warren gem that's been tossed to the side and they can pick it up for cheap. Of course, they don't want to afford Rod Stewart so they decide to have the song re-recorded using an unknown, Russel Watson, who just sounds a whole lot like Rod Stewart.

      And so the flame wars rage on, what with the "Patch Adams Reject" song opening the show. Personally, I kinda like it. Sure, I'm not as diehard a Trekker as others, but I'm cool with the song.

    6. Re:A question.. by mikefoley · · Score: 2

      You're gonna have a hell of a time when you start meeting girls.

      --
      What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
    7. Re:A question.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "You're gonna have a hell of a time when you start meeting girls."

      Tell me about it. The first time I bring one home, my girlfriend'll kill me.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:A question.. by MrPoopyPants · · Score: 1

      It could be worse. They could be using this song.

  24. I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Thag · · Score: 2

    Enterprise IS boring.

    Plus, the "Dear Doctor" episode really really pissed me off. Leave an entire race to die, get laid! What a great moral...

    Frankly, I only really watched Enterprise because Special Unit 2 was on afterwards, and after they took SU2 off the air, there was no reason to watch Enterprise any more.

    I'm looking forward to Firefly on Friday. Joss Whedon writing, and Ben Edlund to keep the show going after Joss loses interest.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Plus, the "Dear Doctor" episode really really pissed me off. Leave an entire race to die, get laid! What a great moral...

      I thought that was one of the most thought-provoking pieces of sci-fi to hit television in a long time.

      For those unfamiliar with the plot (spoilers ahead):

      Enterprise encounters a small pre-warp vessel manned by a crew carrying a fatal disease. Phlox agrees to help their people (the Valakians). When Enterprise arrives at the alien planet, the doctor discovers that the Valakians have a genetic flaw causing them to fall prey to the disease. He concludes that it will eventually lead to their extinction. The Menk, a less advanced humanoid species, are subjugated by the Valakians but show promising signs of intellectual development. Doctor Phlox resists interfering with the natural evolution taking place on the planet, asking Archer what would have happened had ancient extraterestrials given Neanderthals an advantage over Homo Sapiens on Earth. Although it's one of the hardest decisions he has ever faced, Archer agrees with the doctor's reasoning. Even though the doctor has developed a cure for the disease, Enterprise gives the Valakians medicine that will only slow the symptoms and ease their suffering.


      I found it to be a fascinating insight into the moral responsibilities that they faced: Cure the sick, leaving them to continue their subjugation of a developing species, or allow nature to take its course while doing what they could to ease suffering.

      P.S. No, I did not have the whole thing memorized. I did a bit of web surfing to get the names of the species and some plot specifics.
    2. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Drachemorder · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It was definitely thought-provoking, but my enjoyment of it was muted by the fact that I disagreed with the conclusion.

      I hardly think it's morally correct to deny a race the cure to their genetic disease in favor of what might happen thousands or even millions of years in the future. To me it's the same moral question as "Does the end justify the means?" --- should one do something that seems wrong in the present in order to promote a future good?

      Besides, on a more practical note, I think it would have made for more interesting character development later in the series if Archer had taken the opposite opinion and stuck to his moral guns, even if that meant a rift developed between him and Phlox. It would be fun to see the captain and the doctor at each other's throats!

    3. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Enterprise IS boring."

      Women find computers boring. Is it because they're uninteresting, or that they just don't get it?

    4. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by cecirdr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The conclusion to not interfere seems valid if you consider "humanity" to be outside of nature. If you consider "human-ness" to be part and parcel of how nature works, then our technological advances are no different than a thunderstorm, earthquake, or healing summer shower....metaphorically speaking.

      In other words, perhaps "interfering" could also be part of nature's plan or "natural evolution". Humanity is a part of nature too...just as elephants are both destructive and constructive. We just use technology as our agent of change.

    5. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Fenresulven · · Score: 1

      Actually I've always considered what they did to be the best temporary solution to the problem, they bought themselves several years to discuss the ethical issues and rewieving the evidence. They can now choose to do nothing and let them die, or return in a year or two saying: "What do you know our researchers managed to develop a cure".

    6. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Excellent... you said it far better than I could.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by nhavar · · Score: 2

      I agree somewhat with the thought, but it can be twisted.

      As an example look at the American Northwest. For several thousand years man existed within the natural ecosystem. When the different anglo cultures arrived the assumption was that they had dominion over everything in site and could shape it to fit their needs. Technology was used as an agent of change. This included almost complete obliteration of several animal species. We justified it by saying "We're the alpha preditor, no other alpha preditors need to exist". Likewise we used the "we're part of nature and our actions are within that scope".

      To this day ranchers and the Idaho government say idiotic things like "We killed all the wolves 70 years ago, don't bring back things we got rid of." Similar attitudes prevail with some races of people (indians and other minorities), animals, plants, and insects.

      In nature there is a balance. However messy it might be. In human society we work to continually tip this balance in our favor often to the detriment of nature itself. Additionally this tipping of the scales can have serious repercussions on our future.

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    8. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Plus, the "Dear Doctor" episode really really pissed me off. Leave an entire race to die, get laid! What a great moral..."


      it was a great moral, unless you have rather simplistic moral views. I begrudgingly agreed with Phlox's assessment of the situation. I wanted them to save the dying population, but at the same time I had to agree that nature was taking its course. The "subservient" race of people were experiencing rapid evolution. to help the dying race would be to cut off that branch and deny it the chance to grow. This would be, beyond good and evil, morally wrong on an intensly universal level. In a thousand years or more, humans will return to the planet and find a thriving civilization which will greatly outstrip the previous dying civilization.
      Here in this episode we have the beginnings of the foundation of the Prime Directive. You cannot interfere in the internal self-determination of one species over another. I am shocked that you could not understand that.

    9. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by perlyking · · Score: 2

      Well we all find something boring dont we :-)

      I found Enterprise boring because it felt like Bonanza meets Quantum leap.
      Anyone know why?

      --
      no sig.
    10. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like a 50% ripoff of an episode of TNG in which a race of people are addicted to a drug, and picard decides not to give it to them, even though one threatens to kill riker with his electric hands. Also, there is another race whose entire economy is founded on selling them this drug, and they know it, but they tell the first race that they are selling them necessary medicine. But picard can't tell them about it because of the prime directive.

      Yay for recycled plotlines.

    11. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by cecirdr · · Score: 1
      Yup...understood. I'm just trying and idea on for size. Mass extinctions have always occurred and somehow nature survives. The form may be completely different and eons may be required for rebuilding, but nature does survive. Man may use technology tip the balance for far longer and steeper than more natural approaches but balance *will* be restored. Now...we might not like what happens when that restoration begins....there will probably be a mass die off of humanity and much social and economic upheaval. But balance will prevail.

      The fact that man is part of nature doesn't justify raping and pillaging the planet, but in the television show mentioned, the use of technology was not going to be used for pillaging. That was why I mentioned "man as a part of nature" idea.

      Man may cause himself to become extinct, but that won't destroy nature. Even if we destroy much biodiversity, it'll rebuild just like it did after the dinosaurs. We just may not be here to see it. No big loss to the world really.

    12. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      In nature there is a balance. However messy it might be. In human society we work to continually tip this balance in our favor often to the detriment of nature itself. Additionally this tipping of the scales can have serious repercussions on our future.

      The so-called "balance" of nature exists only if you group all of nature together. Look at any species individually, and they work to do the same thing you just accused humans of.

      Striving to the best of our ability to subjugate all other forms of life is how most life forms work. The fact that we can see that there is benefit in other species beyond what we can immediately use them for means that we're better than nature; our mindless quenching and re-quenching of hunger and lust is just being an overly effective natural species, not an evil intelligent one.

    13. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Cure the sick, leaving them to continue their subjugation of a developing species, or allow nature to take its course while doing what they could to ease suffering.

      I think there was a huge plot hole left open in the episode -- the Valakians were never fully told (or shown) that the other species was approching a full intelligence. Had they done that and shown a poor reaction to it, it would have made much more sense.

      However, considering how the Valakians never appeard to mistreat the Menk, I consider the Doctor a serious jerk in this case. It seems pretty obvious it would be better for the two species to live in harmony (which it seems they would) than let one be wiped out. Or at least that's what Greenpeace would like us to think. ;-)

      And, last but not least, the Doctor's counter-argument is a poor one at best. He doesn't consider the possibility that the two species (human/neanderthal) could possibly live together happily. Imagine the difference in the world if that had happened.

      Fortunately, it still doesn't sour me on the captain. I just consider his feeble mind to have been swindled against by another half-argument. :-)

      (Okay, yeah, I take this too seriously. So what?)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I hardly think it's morally correct to deny a race the cure to their genetic disease in favor of what might happen thousands or even millions of years in the future. To me it's the same moral question as "Does the end justify the means?" --- should one do something that seems wrong in the present in order to promote a future good?

      To some extent, it's like the nature shows one sees. While the cinematographers and crew could easily frighten off the wildebeasts, thus, saving them from the lions, they do not.

      This is also not a matter of "doing." It is just the opposite: Dr. Phlox did not actively attempt to interfere with the natural evolution in action on the planet.

      It would be fun to see the captain and the doctor at each other's throats!

      I thought that it was more interesting to see Archer develop intellectually and emotionally as he started to understand Dr. Phlox's perspective. He realized that, through their technology, they had the ability to play god, saving species and dooming others throughout the galaxy.

    15. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Research the number of animals that the first humans in the Americas wiped out ten thousand years ago using nothing but fire and spears. The reason the native Americans were stuck in the hunter-gatherer stage was because they had exterminated any species they could have possibly domesticated. The animals in the Americans hadn't evolved to fear humans.

      Where do you think the mammoths went?

    16. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      The conclusion to not interfere seems valid if you consider "humanity" to be outside of nature.
      [snip]
      Humanity is a part of nature too...just as elephants are both destructive and constructive. We just use technology as our agent of change.


      To extraterrestrial ecosystems (exoecosystems?), humanity is outside of nature. By your logic, we would be perfectly justified in travelling to a planet and destroying it because we are part of "nature" and we have the ability to destroy the planet.

      Along with our technology, knowledge, and intellect come responsibilities. While you cannot hold an elephant responsible for destruction they cause, we can, and should, hold ourselves responsible for our actions. While we might be able to play god someday, I hope we have the wisdom not to.

    17. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I think there was a huge plot hole left open in the episode -- the Valakians were never fully told (or shown) that the other species was approching a full intelligence. Had they done that and shown a poor reaction to it, it would have made much more sense.

      The fact that they had not recognized and encouraged this on their own speaks worlds about their view of the other race. In a matter of a few hours or days, it was obvious to Phlox that the Menks were a developing race with great promise yet they were still being treated much as humans treated slaves in centuries past.

      He doesn't consider the possibility that the two species (human/ neanderthal) could possibly live together happily. Imagine the difference in the world if that had happened.

      And imagine the difference in the world if Neanderthal's shared with Homo Sapiens the unfortunate tendencies towards genocide and prejudice.

      That's the danger with playing god: You end up being ethically responsible for the outcome.

    18. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by bafu · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a 50% ripoff of an episode of TNG in which [ ... ] But picard can't tell them about it because of the prime directive.

      There is no Prime Directive at the time of Enterprise. The ep they are discussing struck me as another step in laying the groundwork for Starfleet making such a rule. Once that was in place, future commanders, like Picard, could just point to the Prime Directive and say, "Sorry, love to help, but my hands are tied."

      Yay for recycled plotlines.

      Like TNG was groundbreaking... ;-)

      Long before TNG did Prime Directive stories, TOS had done them. And long before that the same concepts were explored in written SF ...and so on ...and so on. It's fun when you can see something really, truly new, but if that was the only criteria that made something good then there wouldn't be much reason to watch any Star Trek. The thing is, if it's well-done it's fun to watch. So what if Ghost in the Shell covers the same ground as Blade Runner? They are both more fun to watch than any ST:TNG movie... ;-)

    19. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >it was obvious to Phlox that the Menks were a developing race with great promise yet they were still being treated much as humans treated slaves in centuries past.

      I don't think they were treated like slaves. Slaves were usually beaten into submission, along with other horrible human rights violations. I didn't see that on this episode. They had reasonable jobs that fit their intelligence, lived happily in their own communities, and didn't complain, even though they clearly had enough intelligence to be able to do that if they weren't happy.

      That doesn't sound at all like slavery on earth. I certainly didn't hear the Menk singing "Wade in the Water"... :)

      Not to mention I didn't see anything _forcing_ the Menk to work. They didn't have to, AFAIK. They just wanted to because they're all good hearted people on that planet. If only people could have this sort of co-existence here...

      I simply saw a race of people whose intelligence has gone unnoticed. This isn't all that unusual -- even we do this with other animals (are dolphins smart? What would it take to convince you they are?).

      >And imagine the difference in the world if Neanderthal's shared with Homo Sapiens the unfortunate tendencies towards genocide and prejudice.

      The two races on the show were peacefully co-existing. There appeard to be no spite or malice towards the Menk, and this goes to prove that these races have no human reactions to such things as a lack of intelligence (most humans instinctually scorn this, and treat "stupid" people poorly).

      >That's the danger with playing god: You end up being ethically responsible for the outcome.

      The moment Phlox made the cure he became ethically responsible either way. It's a catch-22 -- do nothing, one race dies, and people blame it on you. Do something, and an unpredictable outcome happens.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    20. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by cecirdr · · Score: 1
      Hahaha! :-) I'm laughing with you, not at you. I see your point. Hmmm, how about this one? Perhaps we *don't* know the full future ramifications of our technological actions? Yes, we're much "smarter" than elephants in certain ways and one can posit that we should take responsibility, but it's very doubtful that we truely understand what or if our technology will exert any impact or significant reshaping of the world over millenial timeframes. We definately know short term consequences...much moreso than the elephants....over hundreds of years, but we have no clue as to our impact over thousands or millions.

      On the short term, we're all pretty much on the same sheet of music. We actually love this place called earth whether we admit it or not and I expect that our natural tendencies to protect what we love will come into play eventually. ....even with those who seem "clueless" or cruel at the moment.

      So, I agree with you that we have a larger perspective and understanding than ....say the elephants and we should try to operate within this world in as neutral a way as possible. But I can't shake the notion that there's a *much* more vast equation and we don't have a clue about that, just as the elephant doesn't have a clue about how his behaviour fits into a bigger picture.

      So....back to the star trek episode... perhaps we can do what we can with our technology as we see morally fit at any given timepoint in our evolution. (morality is constantly in flux) Do what you want and let the big picture take care of itself. Don't back yourself into a corner and limit your choices over issues that may be beyond our perspective at the moment.

      I know many people will disagree with me, but when a person or a group of people are involved in a situation such as postulated in the trek episode, acting is like playing God and not acting is like playing God. Either way, thousands of lives are in your hands. So, like I said above...just do what you feel is best, don't artificially limit your choices and let the big picture sort itself out.

    21. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Thag · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It was definitely thought-provoking, but my enjoyment of it was muted by the fact that I disagreed with the conclusion.


      This is a very nice way to put it. It doesn't quite capture my utter moral abhorrence of the episode's conclusion, though.

      To me, the moral of the episode was "Because I disagree with these people's politics, they all deserve to die." And in particular, Phlox's dialogue about how the ruling race being genetically predisposed towards the disease that was killing them amounted to some kind of genetic destiny was utterly chilling. To me, it's the secular humanist equivalent of "God told me you have to die."

      If I were Archer, I would have suspended Phlox's medical licence immediately, ordered him to give over the cure, and launched a court-martial inquiry back home to determine his ongoing fitness to practice medicine. (Practice it somewhere else, that is, because he would never practice medicine on my crew again.)

      On the other hand, this is from the same franchise that put nurseries on warships, so expecting any kind of moral consciousness from them is probably an exercise in futility.

      Jon Acheson
      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    22. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Saeger · · Score: 2
      But I can't shake the notion that there's a *much* more vast equation and we don't have a clue about that, just as the elephant doesn't have a clue about how his behaviour fits into a bigger picture.

      We do have a tiny clue, but you're right that it's not enough to see the big picture from our current perspective. You can't teach an elephant to engineer a space shuttle any more than a human can be taught to understand "42".

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    23. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by fendel · · Score: 1

      Women find computers boring. Is it because they're uninteresting, or that they just don't get it?

      I beg your pardon?

      fendel
      (female, and anxiously awaiting her new OEM Athlon XP2000+ from Googlegear)

    24. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Heh. I had a feeling I'd flush out a femme with that comment.

      So I gotta ask: Did you think I meant you in particular, or did you think I meant every single female living today on the entire planet?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    25. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Hey idiot, you forgot to hit the 'AC' button when you tried to pose as me. Ass. lol.

    26. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Thag · · Score: 2
      it was a great moral, unless you have rather simplistic moral views.


      You must certainly be an innovator in the field of morality then.

      I begrudgingly agreed with Phlox's assessment of the situation. I wanted them to save the dying population, but at the same time I had to agree that nature was taking its course.

      If your mantra is "Let nature take its course," why be a doctor?
      The "subservient" race of people were experiencing rapid evolution. to help the dying race would be to cut off that branch and deny it the chance to grow. This would be, beyond good and evil, morally wrong on an intensly universal level.

      Except that in the actual episode, the ruling race was shown to be fairly benevolent, and in no way was preventing the subservient race from developing, becaue there they were and the development was going on.

      In a thousand years or more, humans will return to the planet and find a thriving civilization which will greatly outstrip the previous dying civilization.
      ...that they killed.

      And, how does it necessarily follow that the subservient race will thrive in the absence of the ruling race? If the ruling race dies off rapidly and civilization collapses, most of the subservient race will die in the ensuing dark ages. Possibly all of them.

      Here in this episode we have the beginnings of the foundation of the Prime Directive. You cannot interfere in the internal self-determination of one species over another. I am shocked that you could not understand that.

      And here we see why Kirk frequently defied the Prime Directive. And I'm not at all surprised you couldn't understand that.

      Jon Acheson
      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    27. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      I think the Prime Directive stuff strikes the wrong chord in an age when our leaders are perfectly willing to bomb the shit out of less advanced cultures--for money. If you like that sort of stuff, you're not going to like the Prime Directive.

      However, the way I interpret the situation is that the Prime Directive is exactly right, and our current leaders are perverted shithead bastards.

      Although, having said that, I do think it's a bit hard to draw this analogy with regard to helping less technologically advanced cultures here on Earth. The Prime Directive presupposes that we are dealing with an insulated society that has not been tampered with by the technologically advanced powers. As a matter of fact, there is no such society on Earth right now. So the question of whether we should do something to undo some of the poverty and diseases in Africa can't be seen in a Prime Directive context, because we are responsible in large part for their social ills. (By "we" I mean, again, the technologically advanced powers.) We bully their economies and leave them to dig in diamond mines, if we leave any work for them at all... We sell them weapons and watch them blow holes in each other. So yes, the Prime Directive allows the Federation to undo the damage they cause to societies. That's why "charity" for Africa is a moral imperative, but interference with an undisturbed culture is a moral transgression. These values make perfect sense in my opinion.

    28. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by legoboy · · Score: 2
      I found it to be a fascinating insight into the moral responsibilities that they faced: Cure the sick, leaving them to continue their subjugation of a developing species, or allow nature to take its course while doing what they could to ease suffering.

      Pshaw. Letting nature take its course. You're defending genocide, here. "I have a cure for what will kill billions! But to give it to you would be tantamount to interfering with evolution! Therefore, no cure for you!"

      Billions die deaths that he is directly responsible for (choosing to take no action is equivalent to choosing to take action) but at least the good doctor can sleep at night!

      Hell, the justification was that the other race was developing and that the dying one was holding them back, a theory which had no support whatsoever. If all people were dying and we had been busily developing the intellect of dolphins (by attaching laser beams to their heads), would it be morally unjust for us to look for a cure? I think not, and when the pansy environmentalists realize that their own neck is on the line, 99+% of them would want the cure, too.

      As others in the thread have mentioned, there's no such thing as externalities in the theory of evolution.

      --
      If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    29. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by Drachemorder · · Score: 2
      "This is a very nice way to put it. It doesn't quite capture my utter moral abhorrence of the episode's conclusion, though."

      I always try to put things nicely on /. because my opinions are generally the sort that would get me flamed and/or modded down to oblivion if I stated them in anything other than a non-aggressive manner. :-)

      I do tend to agree with you, though. And to me, the worst part of the doctor's opinion is that he treats evolution as a moral principle, not just a scientific explanation for the development of life and civilization. That bothers me for several reasons --- one of which being that evolution is an inherently ruthless process of the strong surviving at the expense of the weak. To put it mildly, I don't see that as something a civilized species should derive moral principles from. (Unless, of course, your civilization is Klingon.)

    30. Re:I watched it as the lead-in to SU2. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      actually, it has the apearance of though prevoking, but really it's trying to force you to think there way.

      Really thought pervoking would have had the same delema, but no other moral stand, like subugating another race.

      "what would have happened had ancient extraterestrials given Neanderthals an advantage over Homo Sapiens "

      again, pretty lame, sure there would ba an impact on homo sapiens, but by the same token, the neanderthals would be pretty happy.

      picture a world where that did happen:
      "what would have happened had ancient extraterestrials had not given Neanderthals an advantage over Homo Sapiens "

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. His right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about his left?

    The Lone Gunmen are dead, by the way.

  26. Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by loggia · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you are wondering where the archetypal "searching for humanity" character is on this show, it is reportedly Captain Archer's dog Porthos.

    After having his brain advanced 1,000,000 dog years, Porthos will become an ensign and have to grapple with an Earth that does not grant individual freedoms to dogs. Look for episode "Man's Best Friend" where Porthos is deemed the propery of Starfleet and Archer must argue that Porthos deserves to makes his own choices.

    1. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by fataugie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh huh...so after he takes a shit on the captains chair, his name is going to be changed from Porthos to "That fucking dog"...

      At least that's the way it works in my house....

      --

      WTF? Over?

    2. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      No , don't forget he'll want to "become more human" so he'll get drunk , stagger back to his kennel , throw up , get confused climb onto the captains chair, throw up again , THEN take a shit on it... and promptly fall asleep for 12 hours.

    3. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Porthos will become an ensign and have to grapple with an Earth that does not grant individual freedoms to dogs."

      He'll also have to face discrimination, as Starfleet doesn't allow anything with more than 2 legs to board a starship.

    4. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > After having his brain advanced 1,000,000 dog years, Porthos will become an ensign and have to grapple with an Earth that does not grant individual freedoms to dogs. Look for episode "Man's Best Friend" where Porthos is deemed the propery of Starfleet and Archer must argue that Porthos deserves to makes his own choices.

      After 1,000,000 years, Porthos will be dressed like a flamboyant 70s pimp, and worried about his appearance more than anything, and, oh, no, wait, that was the Cat from Red Dwarf... Wrong series. My bad.

    5. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by pauls2272 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Later, Porthos's brain is transplanted into a human. He's called Westley...

    6. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and he will change his name to Jar-Jar.

    7. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by ethereal · · Score: 1

      Westley: "As you wish."

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    8. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      Porthos wins his case and becomes a member of the bridge crew, but the end comes when he forgets where he is and goes over next to control console and lifts his leg...

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    9. Re:Porthos Becomes Sentient Lifeform by jbarr · · Score: 2

      Porthos is a kennel. ;-)

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  27. Minor Nit: Spelling by Foggy+Tristan · · Score: 1

    Actually, shouldn't it be Premiere? (It's the premier episode, but a season premiere.)

    --
    Beware typoes.
    1. Re:Minor Nit: Spelling by Andy+Social · · Score: 1

      Compared to the usual spelling (or is that speeling?) standards online, that is a pretty minor nit. Want to trade spellings of "your" for a while?

      --
      Illegitimi non carborundum
    2. Re:Minor Nit: Spelling by Foggy+Tristan · · Score: 1

      What, you mean like days of you're? :)

      When Pearl Harbor was running its little banner ads for the DVD version, I came across one that had Harbor misspelled. Pretty funny. Wish I still had it.

      --
      Beware typoes.
    3. Re:Minor Nit: Spelling by Andy+Social · · Score: 1

      Did they spell it like they were British, maybe? At least that would be a valid alternative.

      --
      Illegitimi non carborundum
  28. Build your own Warp Engine by XScB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Farnell the electronic component suppliers have taken it on themselves to bring the people of Earth into an age of interstellar travel early by having started to stock Dilithium Crystals. If you go to the Farnell site, select the UK site, then the Online Catalogue, Electronic components and finally Crystals, you can see them.

    Unfortunately they seem to be out of stock right now if you were thinking of building your own Warp engine.

    1. Re:Build your own Warp Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the correct moderation would be "Informative" since it's true!

    2. Re:Build your own Warp Engine by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Won't do you much good without anitmatter, if I understand my Star Trek "physics".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Build your own Warp Engine by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      radioshack is out too, they're always outa flux capacitors too, they always say 2 weeks, but then i call back...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  29. Enterprise's problem by Aexia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great premise, likeable characters and good actors.

    It got off to a great start. The Broken Bow was easily the best of the Trek pilots.

    So what's the problem? It almost seems as if the producers want Enteprise to ASPIRE to be as mediocre as Voyager was.

    It's stuck in that "nothing can change week to week" mentality that Paramount has long imposed on Trek. Worse, it's not even particularly bad like Voyager was early on... it's just... there. More often then not, it's not good or bad. Just something I could care less about.

    The Temporal Cold War is at least a step in the right direction, even if I think they've removed too much of the mystery from it. Compare "Future Guy's" appearance in the pilot to what it was in the finale. Initially, you couldn't tell anything about him and there was that cool distortion effect. Now, he looks like a guy dressed in stage black.

    Sullick and Daniels are a little too black & white. I wished they could've pretened for more than a fraction of an episode that the Suliban might actually be the good guys. Or that there were no good guys in this fight.

    But the fact that they have an continuing, if infrequently returned to, storyline is a positive step. Having *consistant* internal continuity is generally a good thing for a show. It's an incentive to watch, when done properly.

    As it is, I generally don't care about Enterprise.

    1. Re:Enterprise's problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree - although to have too strong a carry on subplot(s) can turn it into space opera, which becomes frustrating to anyone but the addicted.

      I've watched maybe 6 episodes from series one, and couldn't really care what order they were in - thats wrong. You should feel SOME progress, and feel SOME 'hurrah - I made a connection, I got the joke' moments.

      The Simpsons actually does this really well, from tiny references to a shirt Homer once wore to the more obvious "Maggies shooting Burns didn't make sense" references. But it still hangs together week to week.

    2. Re:Enterprise's problem by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      Or that there were no good guys in this fight.

      Well, there's nothing to say that couldn't still be the case. The best villians, IMO, are the ones you think are your friends (or who actually are your friends -- personally, I think they should have kept Evil Willow as the Big Bad for this season of Buffy).

      Anyhow, both sides are obviously manipulating their pieces (enterprise/suliban) to further their own ends.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:Enterprise's problem by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I think you just explained why I don't watch it: there's no reason to. Nothing is going to happen this week that will prevent me from watching and understanding next week. Oops, dinner was late, I'll skip Enterprise. Having fun playing with the kid, I'll skip Enterprise. (Okay, bad choices, but the former can certainly be worked around, and the VCR is for the latter. But I don't care)

      I watched the repeat of the season finale, and really enjoyed it. But if I miss next week's episode, what does it matter?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:Enterprise's problem by iabervon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There actually have been a number of episodes which refer to previous episodes; mostly of the sort where they do something in one episode, and then encounter people who have heard about it and want them to do something else because of it.

      I think they've done a good job of maintaining the Trek "everything is fixed at the end of the episode", while having people notice that this group has an impressive record of getting into situations and resolving them.

      I'm not entirely convinced that Daniels's side is actually good; it seems like all of their information has come from Daniels, and he might just be feeding them propaganda. Sullick is clearly against them, but might have reasons for it. There's a lot of potential for a major plot twist at some point.

    5. Re:Enterprise's problem by Control-Z · · Score: 1
      It's stuck in that "nothing can change week to week" mentality that Paramount has long imposed on Trek. Worse, it's not even particularly bad like Voyager was early on... it's just... there. More often then not, it's not good or bad. Just something I could care less about.

      I think you're onto something here. If it were a serial more like Buffy I think it would be a lot more interesting than "neat little wrapped up in one hour with big bad danger thwarted at the end" episodes. Of course that would be an obstacle to new viewers, but the way this series is going they better do something!

      My best memory of the ST:TNG series was the major Borg battle series of episodes. Those were better than all the movies put together.

    6. Re:Enterprise's problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does *anyone* who watches these shows give a *damn* about continuity? I'd like to see the show that explains how the Klingon went from RRRidges on forehead, to no ridges, back to rrridges in the space of a few hundred years. Etc.

    7. Re:Enterprise's problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great premise, likeable characters and good actors.

      Except I can't for the life of me remember and crew member's names beyond John and Hoshi. What's up with that?

    8. Re:Enterprise's problem by sjgman9 · · Score: 1

      That actually was explained, sort of.

      There was an episode of DS9 where the defiant got stuck in the past thanks to an orb. The defiant wound up right near the Enterprise of Captain Kirk.

      The Enterprise and Defiant were near some space station and klingons were on the station too. They were trying to kill Tribbles. There was a brawl in the cafeteria where Worf has to point out that yes those were ridgless klingons, its a long story and not discussed with outsiders.

    9. Re:Enterprise's problem by Equinox · · Score: 1

      You can't remember Trip? As posted above, he's a drunken engineer for God's sake! What are you doing on /.? (Standard disclaimers apply...for the humour impaired, I'm teasing.)

    10. Re:Enterprise's problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. Count your blessings by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.

    That sure as hell beats getting pre-empted by some terrorist attack.

    1. Re:Count your blessings by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      That sure as hell beats getting pre-empted by some terrorist attack.

      Well, Bush might terrorize Irak anytime, mabe even tonight, trigger happy as he is. So you never know.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Count your blessings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, Bush might terrorize Irak anytime, mabe even tonight, trigger happy as he is. So you never know.
      <sarcasm> Yeah that foolish, foolish Bush. Doesn't he realize that Iraq is our buddy now? They couldn't possibly have anything against us... after we wiped out the 4th-largest standing army in the world!

      And that not wanting weapons inspectors to come in... that's just because of national pride... they aren't making any weapons!

      And gassing their own people... that's only bad when Nazis or Soviets do it, but for Persians, it's just how things are done! </sarcasm>
    3. Re:Count your blessings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.
      That sure as hell beats getting pre-empted by some terrorist attack.
      Unless you're the terrorist...
    4. Re:Count your blessings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Looks like the rest of the world will pressure
      him to wait until millions are killed in a bioattack
      on the U.S, Israel, or elsewhere, either through Sadam,
      or from the people he gives the bio germs to.

      Well, we might as well wait it out and pretend that
      he's a peaceful person, or that nobody would be so
      irrational as to attack the U.S. on its own soil.
      (That would NEVER happen, right?)

      Seriously though, if you think a bio attack on the
      U.S. is unlikely . . . were you surprised at all by
      Sept 11? Did you see that one coming?

      For my money, I'll take sides with the 'terrorist'
      who at least follows some rules of civilized warfare
      and does not INTENTIONALLY target innocent people.

  31. Finally by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1, Troll

    Some real sci-fi!

    I'm so sick of waiting for new episodes. Enterprise is, bar none, the best sci-fi show on TV.

    That includes Farscape. "We fired our writers and hired a 6th grade creative writing class!"

    I mean come on. Fucking telepathic clams? This is supposed to be quality!??! Not to mention that the alien races look worse than most Halloween costumes! If you think those are good, you obviously haven't been involved in any theater!

    I'm looking forward to having some good sci-fi. Fortunately, even when Star Trek sucks (which Enterprise most definitely doesn't), it's better than Farscape, Babylon "We Love Politics" 5, and Star "Overacting is not optional" Wars.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. Star Trek is basically just an action show. There's virtually no science in it. If you want to call it anything, call it Techo-babble-fiction.

    2. Re:Finally by compupc1 · · Score: 1

      Actually Star Trek is far less about action and more about being a parallel to humanity. If you were to watch, most episodes have a bit of action but out of a season of 26 there's usually only 3 or 4 "action shows". The majority are other things like dramas, comedies, and also some "classic sci-fi" episodes. This is one of the biggest min-nomers. Trek is NOT about action like Star Wars is, and when people watch it expecting lots of action and then don't see any, they assume something is wrong (which it isn't).

      --
      -James
    3. Re:Finally by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I mean come on. Fucking telepathic clams?

      Dude, you need to get out more.

      I mean, Earth Girls Are Easy, but everyone from the Fifth Invader Force knows that $cientologist chicks are, like, the worst lays on the planet.

      *rimshot*

    4. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are insane.
      Farscape has been the best SciFi I have ever seen on TV, the problem with viewers is it's not for the small minded.

      www.savefarscape.com

    5. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to mention that the alien races look worse than most Halloween costumes!

      Although they're a little more creative than the "nose-ridge of the week".

    6. Re:Finally by ramdac · · Score: 1

      It's Techno-babble fiction.

  32. "With my luck..." by Thenomain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    With OUR luck, the ending will be reported in a Slashdot article on the front page.

    --
    This now concludes our broadcast day.
  33. Thats what some people like about it by Viol8 · · Score: 0

    Not everyone wants to watch the Sci Fi equivalent of a morality play or a sociology lecture. Sometimes its nice to watch some ass get kicked instead of "lets discuss this in my ready room" followed by 10 minutes of interminable hand wringing and "but the prime directive says we can't shoot anyone who's attacking us , we have to feel their pain and understand where they're coming from". Gimme a f*cking break.

    1. Re:Thats what some people like about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be from the might-is-right-and-goodness-is-weakness school of thought.

  34. Enterprise is it's own nation? by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow, I knew Star Trek was big, but not so big to have it's own Prime Minister. I wonder who the Premier could be...

    Unless of course the editors meant premiere which is the first public performance of something. Nahhh.

    1. Re:Enterprise is it's own nation? by sielwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      From 'dict premier' (highlighting mine)

      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:

      Premier \Pre"mi*er\, n.
      The first minister of state; the prime minister.

      From WordNet (r) 1.7 [wn]:

      premier
      adj 1: first in rank or degree; "an architect of premier rank";
      "the prime minister" [syn: {premier(a)}, {prime(a)}]
      2: preceding all others in time; "the premiere showing" [syn: {premiere}]
      n 1: the person who holds the position of head of state in
      England [syn: {Prime Minister}, {PM}]
      2: the person who is head of state (in several countries) [syn:
      {chancellor}, {prime minister}]
      3: the position of the cabinet minister who is in charge of
      government affairs [syn: {Prime Minister}, {PM}]
      v 1: be performed for the first time; of a play, ballet, or
      composition [syn: {premiere}]
      2: perform a work for the first time [syn: {premiere}]

      What have we learned from this: there are different flavors of English (UK, US, Engrish). So some people take the lift from the first floor to the lorry. Some take the elevator from the second floor to the van. While others take the happy number one good star ok.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    2. Re:Enterprise is it's own nation? by Andy+Social · · Score: 1

      Um, you misused "it's" in your subject about misuse of words. I love a good irony.

      --
      Illegitimi non carborundum
    3. Re:Enterprise is it's own nation? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      The headline: Enterprise Season Premier Tonight.

      Part of speech of "Premier" in the headline: noun.

      Part of speech highlighted in Slashdot post: adjective.

      Your definition does not give a noun form of "premier" with the required meaning. As far as I know, there isn't one.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    4. Re:Enterprise is it's own nation? by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      Curses! Strunk & White have failed me once again. (Or rather, I failed to use Strunk & White.)

    5. Re:Enterprise is it's own nation? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Um, you misused "it's" in your subject about misuse of words. I love a good irony."

      Bye bye virgin alarm. Heh.

    6. Re:Enterprise is it's own nation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I knew somebody who installed Linux recently. I'd love to get a story posted on Slashdot.

      I wish there were a lot more M$-shill sites out there! You can never have enough of those!!!

  35. Dork alert, dork alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek? "I hope it doesn't get pre-empted by some sporting event?"

    Better change your pocket protector before the show so you don't have to change your shirt if your pens explode!

    Nerd. This is why IT professionals are looked at like such dorks. Us normal IT guys get a bad wrap.

    1. Re:Dork alert, dork alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you "normal" IT guys also cannot spell or use proper grammar, so you're just as much a dork as the "geeks."

  36. Discrepancies by magicsquid · · Score: 2

    As further testament of Star Trek's near universal appeal, I read this on ESPN Page 2 yesterday...

    Last spring, "Enterprise" wound up with part one of a time-travel cliffhanger. You may recall that in the original Captain Kirk episodes -- which come after "Enterprise" chronologically, since the new series is a prequel -- time travel was depicted as an astonishing discovery.

    In "Enterprise," time travel has already happened several times and is practically viewed as common. So how could Kirk, who is supposed to be born years after the era depicted in "Enterprise," not have known that? And how come in "Enterprise," the Vulcans are the big spacefaring power in Earth's part of the Milky Way, their ships and diplomats everywhere -- but in the Captain Kirk episodes, which happen later, the Vulcans are depicted as an insular, technologically modest people, and Spock is described as the first Vulcan ever to explore space.

    --


    "Chances of RHIC-induced Armageddon are exceedingly rare, but... you never know." - MIT Physicist Bob Jaffe
    1. Re:Discrepancies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.

      Hey, look over there!!

      *whoosh*

    2. Re:Discrepancies by Blob+Pet · · Score: 1

      While there are lots of discrepancies, TOS never claimed that vulcans weren't a spacefaring power and they didn't have diplomats everywhere...remember Ambassador Sarek in Journey to Babel? I believe the claim was that Spock was the first to join Star Fleet, not to explore space. T'Pal is not a member of Star Fleet. Vulcans were exploring space long before at least as early as when the Romulans left Vulcan. Time travel knowledge can be easily explained by the fact that such abilities can be very dangerous and thus classified.

      --
      "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
    3. Re:Discrepancies by For+me+to+poop · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scrathcy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we, to believe that this is some sort of a, a magic xylophone or something?

      ...I'll field this one!

      --
      Here's a spoiler... You will die a lonely man.
    4. Re:Discrepancies by Maran · · Score: 1

      "Spock is described as the first Vulcan ever to explore space."

      Huh? Where the heck did that come from? First off, there's the Romulans, who are (unless I'm mistaken) decended from Vulcans. Then there was the USS Intrepid (the one that got eaten by the giant single-celled thing), which had a crew entirely composed of Vulcans (which means a Vulcan captain, which implies a Vulcan who's been in Starfleet longer than Spock). I'm ignoring "First Contact", as that's not part of the original series.

      As for "technologically modest", wasn't it the Vulcan Institute of Science that developed that sensor net thing the blind woman wore, in that episode with the Medusan(?) ambasador who couldn't be looked at?

      Or am I completely wrong, not being a trekkie?

      Maran

    5. Re:Discrepancies by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

      This is my whole problem with the show, they are essentially rewriting Star Trek history as it was laid out in the original series, essentially invalidating a number of things. In the episode Balance of Terror the Romulans only had vessels with impulse power and it was established that the war with the Romulans that took place was conducted before warp drive was discovered. So in the original series human's met the Romulans before the Klingons, but in Enterprise we met the Klingon's apparently before the Romulans. And not to nit pick but as I watched last season there were at least half a dozen other major continuity issues.

    6. Re:Discrepancies by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      In the episode Balance of Terror the Romulans only had vessels with impulse power and it was established that the war with the Romulans that took place was conducted before warp drive was discovered.

      So they fought an interstellar war at 1/4 c? I really, really doubut that. Maybe they had poor engines, but they definitly had warp.

      So in the original series human's met the Romulans before the Klingons, but in Enterprise we met the Klingon's apparently before the Romulans. And not to nit pick but as I watched last season there were at least half a dozen other major continuity issues.

      "Temporal Cold War."

      Enterprise is 4th dimensionally prior to all other version of 'trek... but becuase of the TCW, it's 5th dimensionally later. What I'm going to watch tonight is the "now" in the trekiverse.

      I doubt that Paramonunt's going to try and explain this to anyone (too much pain for too little benefit), and they might not even realize it, but they will follow through on it. Aside from the actual facts of the episodes, anything and everything in the "continuity" is up for grabs if it will make a good story.

      Or have you allready written a letter complaining about the odd look of the klingons?

    7. Re:Discrepancies by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      One of my gripes was that the Federation didn't encounter the Ferrengi until Picard's time! Isn't that nearly 2 centuries after Enterprise?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Discrepancies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor am I a trekkie, but I *do* recall that cloaked ships were a big deal in the first series, but they are common in the new one. Not to mention the Klingons appearance "Klingons have rrridges, oops, they don't, now they do again...
      What would have been *really* brave would have been to had an even more primitive looking and smaller set than the original...although I do approve of the goo applications to the Vulcan chickarina...

    9. Re:Discrepancies by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      One of my gripes was that the Federation didn't encounter the Ferrengi until Picard's time!

      One of my gripes is that the Federation encountered the Ferrengi.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    10. Re:Discrepancies by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Spockers was the first Vulcan to join starfleet, and the first Vulcan to volunteer for service on a Human ship, IIRC. Intrepid was full of Vulcan types, but it was a Vulcan-only crewed ship.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  37. Brannon Braga: Farscape is "Whiz Doodle" of Sci-Fi by loggia · · Score: 1

    Star Trek executive producer Brannon Braga called Farscape the "whiz doodle" of sci-fi.

    What does this mean?!

  38. Three Words by serutan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Time Travel.
    Wesley.

    1. Re:Three Words by MaxVolume · · Score: 0

      Go back to WilWheaton.net ya troll!!!!

    2. Re:Three Words by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Funny

      the words being "die die die"?

  39. Even ESPN can see problems with the timeline by scotay · · Score: 1

    I was looking forward to Enterprise and its promise not to use a particle-of-the-week approach to wrapping up each episode. I'm afraid the temporal cold war sounds like another crutch for weak screen writers. Heck, even ESPN's Tuesday morning quarterback is left questioning the situation (find near the end of the article).

    At the end of the cliffhanger, something goes horribly wrong and Archer and the agent from the future find themselves again in the San Francisco apartment, but 900 years later. All San Francisco lies in smoking ruins; something Archer did in the past has altered the time line, and that's the cliffhanger. But what TMQ noticed was that except for broken windows, Archer's apartment looked exactly the same in the 31st century as it had in the back-to-the-past scene in the 22nd century. Nothing in Archer's apartment had changed in 900 years.

    You know your in trouble when the dumb Jocks are smart enough to figure out something is wrong here.

    1. Re:Even ESPN can see problems with the timeline by spookymonster · · Score: 1

      Archer screws up.
      A day later, all life on Earth is destroyed.
      Archer and Future Guy reappear in the future. Earth is exactly the way Archer left it, which isn't suprising given that no one has stepped foot on the planet since it was destroyed.

      The only mystery here is why wasn't his apartment covered in 900 years of dirt and dust?

      --
      - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
    2. Re:Even ESPN can see problems with the timeline by yomegaman · · Score: 0

      I guess you missed the author information at the bottom:

      Gregg Easterbrook is a senior editor of New Republic, a contributing editor of The Atlantic Monthly and a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution. He is believed to be the first Brookings scholar ever to write a pro football column.

      Not exactly a "dumb jock"...

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    3. Re:Even ESPN can see problems with the timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's self cleaning of course. ;P You don't honestly think we'll forever clean our homes ourselves do you?

    4. Re:Even ESPN can see problems with the timeline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the spirit of your comment, except that last part. Dumb jocks? Didn't your mother teach you not to use double negatives?

      Seriously though, jocks who are the stereotypical stupid usually do not get to the professional level, esp. football. I'm not saying what they do is rocket science, but most are more articulate, worldly, and observant (that's their trade) than your average geek. Not to sound Gundam 0083ish, but they aren't your average (high school) jock.

    5. Re:Even ESPN can see problems with the timeline by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 1

      not to be pedantic, but when he isn't writing his football column (which is pretty good), that "dumb jock" is "a senior editor of New Republic, a contributing editor of The Atlantic Monthly and a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution", according to the author bio at the bottom of the page.

  40. Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Thag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of the major problems with Enterprise is that TIME TRAVEL SUCKS. It's been completely overdone, BADLY, particularly on Trek, and I for one am not going to watch any more time travel eps.

    Because they're ALL THE SAME EPISODE: crew encounters time wedgie. Crew solves time wedgie puzzle. Time returns to normal. Teenage son lies to a cute girl at school to impress her, but gets found out and learns an important lesson about honesty. Roll credits.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    1. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was always hoping that when Geordi or Data was sending the chronoton/tachyon burst that was going to set things straight after that week's temporal anomoly, that as soon as he hit the last button on the control panel some secondary character would just blink out of existence. The crew would look at each other, shrug, and go on with their business.

    2. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by iabervon · · Score: 2

      There's something different going on with the time travel on Enterprise. First, we have people "from the future", who could be just well-informed people from the present. Then, we have the captain going "to the past", but he doesn't seem to have changed anything in the present by doing that; he finds out a bunch of stuff about the present there. Finally, we have the captain going "to the future", but it's indistinguishable from any other destroyed city. When the captain went to the past and spent some time there, he returned to the present later than he left.

      Most likely, there isn't time travel going on, just shape-changing aliens recording events and playing them back in a holodeck-like thing. They could just have a clever sort of teleporter, a holodeck, and be using time travel as their excuse for having a lot of information that they don't want to admit to collecting.

    3. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2

      I've found that Enterprise' time travel storyline has a different flavour from those of Star Treks past (future?...nevermind). The biggest problem is that the writers seemed to think that time travel itself is a plot. It's not.

      Time travel can be a great plot *device*. And in the case of Enterprise, I've found it to be a very interesting one. It's not a matter of temporal fluxes and causal loops, it's more the story of a guy who gets drawn into a battle between two much larger, much more powerful groups. Like Frodo in Lord of the Rings. I agree - I'm sick to death of episodes that use time travel/anomalies as if they're a plot in and of themselves. But I think Enterprise is different - and I've enjoyed what I've seen so far.

    4. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Aexia · · Score: 2

      Actually, Enterprise's plots, at least early on, seem to follow the formula:

      1. Enterprise encounters new planet/race/ship/widget.
      2. T'Pol advises caution.
      3. Archer and Tripp mock T'Pol and Vulcans in general.
      4. Away team is sent to investigate/explore.
      5. Away team gets in trouble.
      6. Something rescues them.
      7. Archer et al learn no lessons from the experience.

    5. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by EvlG · · Score: 2

      I'd like to amend your episode plan:

      1. Enterprise encounters new planet/race/ship/widget.
      2. T'Pol advises caution.
      3. Archer and Tripp mock T'Pol and Vulcans in general.
      4. Away team is sent to investigate/explore.
      5. T'Pol advises caution.
      6. Archer and Tripp mock T'Pol and Vulcans in general.
      7. Away team gets in trouble.
      8. Something rescues them - usually T'Pol.
      9. Archer et al learn no lessons from the experience, and instead just mock T'Pol and Vulcans in general.

    6. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by nayrbmai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And if they didn't, damnit, it would be a 10 minute show...

    7. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Time travel will give me a headache!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Thag · · Score: 2

      That is a pretty amusing thought, in a dark sort of way. Never happen on Trek, or course.

      Jon Acheson

      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    9. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      ...8. Profit?!?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    10. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by perfects · · Score: 1

      > TIME TRAVEL SUCKS

      Well, it seems to me that when the producer chose the near-future time period for Enterprise -- a great choice IMO -- they had three choices:

      1) Live with "the Titanic problem" i.e. everybody knows how it ends. In this case we know that Kirk and Spock explored the galaxy later on, so we know that the human race was not destroyed, Earth was not conquered by aliens, etc.

      2) Give up on exploring all of the "big" plots like that.

      3) Use time travel to leave open the possibility that the future will not unfold the way we expect.

      Personally, I like the whole Temporal Cold War idea. It adds a layer of complexity that would be missing if their travel was limited to three dimensions. But that's just me. I liked DS9 too.

    11. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Thag · · Score: 2

      I see a fourth possiblity: tell the story of the birth of the Federation on a relatively small galactic stage, using new races that are "close to Earth," and not even bringing the Romulans into it for a season or two.

      We have no idea what happened then: it's completely virgin territory, except for some of the paperbacks, and they're not canon. So you would have complete freedom, except you couldn't destroy the Earth, [big deal] and things would have to be moving towards the birth of the Federation.

      A fifth possibility, that would have worked just as well, would be to tell the fanboys "We're restarting the Trek universe for this one. Continuity from the other series need not necessarily apply." For one thing, it gets rid of all the history that was already supposed to have happened and didn't, like Khan and the Eugenics Wars. It would also give you a good excuse to fire the writing staff and hire actual talent.

      Jon Acheson

      --
      All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
    12. Re:Enterprise's problem is TIME TRAVEL SUCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to do that without the obligatory red shirts; how else would they know who to dispose of?..

  41. Your luck by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.

    You're a lucky fellow, then?

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  42. so when do *we* get it? by splateagle · · Score: 1

    OK, Canada saw it last night, those of you in the states with UPN will get it tonight, anybody any idea when it's due to appear in the UK? (any channel, which most likely means Sky 1, right)

  43. Re:In my opinion by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    Pretty impressive considering the show starts before the theme song. Sorry, but it had to be said.

  44. Viewing Enterprise in St Louis by bay43270 · · Score: 2

    For those of you in St. Louis who don't know, channel 46 (currently home shopping) will become a UPN station next April. The owners were nice enough to strike a deal with HSN to show two hours of UPN a week until their contract runs up in April. Enterprise will run this Friday at 7pm (last years last episode) and 8pm (this years first). Next week, Enterprise will show at 7 and Buffy at 8.

    There's an article out on the post dispatch web site, but I don't feel like looking for it right now.

    1. Re:Viewing Enterprise in St Louis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many thanks for the information, you've made a college dork's life so much happier

    2. Re:Viewing Enterprise in St Louis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Thanks for the info.

    3. Re:Viewing Enterprise in St Louis by vrmlguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, you can do what I did, which was scrap Charter, buy DishNetwork, and sign up for the superstation package, which consists of the UPN stations in NY and Boston and the WB stations in NY, Denver and LA. This provides two benefits: (1) I get to watch Enterprise and Buffy with the rest of the country, and (2) I never have to worry about KPLR preempting Angel and Smallville for Blues hockey. The only drawback is having two stations that advertise themselves as "WB 11".

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  45. When trouble is near... by OSUJoe · · Score: 1

    ... the only thing that can save the enterprise now is Ziggy, everyone's favorite time travel probability computer!

  46. Bizarre mods by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Offtopic? Twice? This is a person that wrote about watching Enterprise in an article about Enterprise.

    Hardly the most insightful comment ever, but certainly on topic.

  47. Re:Brannon Braga: Farscape is "Whiz Doodle" of Sci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mainly that it sucks total ass.

  48. Do you think Gene Roddenberry would like this show by loggia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you noticed that since Gene Roddenberry's death the franchise has truly suffered?

    Sure, the showrunners bristled at Gene's humanist view and various objections to darker themes - but sure enough, since his death the franchise has continually become less-and-less "beloved."

    There are so many elements that ignore Roddenberry's view in Enterprise that I wonder if it is the first show that is hardly "Star Trek" at all?

  49. Damn plugins by theefer · · Score: 1

    Shockwave ? I already told you that I hate those flash plugins !

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Damn plugins by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      They don't work on my system. Any way, I'm looking for information, not flashy "content". If you don't want to give me information, I don't want to see what you have any way.

  50. dumb jocks? by splateagle · · Score: 1

    you know *you're* in trouble when the dumb Jocks are smart enough to know when to use an apostrophe :D

  51. When is it coming to Holland ? by l0rd · · Score: 1

    Been waiting for ages and ages for the new star trek to air here. When o when will it come :(

    1. Re:When is it coming to Holland ? by happyvalley · · Score: 1

      One second. It's not showing in the Netherlands?
      I'm supposed to move there in October. As I
      understand it, internet connections are way slow.
      So downloading will not be feasible.
      I think I have to notify my boss.

    2. Re:When is it coming to Holland ? by hoytt · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I thought it was on BBC Choice in the UK, which is a BBC station I can't get. I do hope a commercial station here (NET5, SBS) will buy the series, because I sure as hell won't fork over 15 for 90 minute videos.

    3. Re:When is it coming to Holland ? by l0rd · · Score: 1

      Actually, that depends where you live. In a lot of places in Holland you can get ADSL/Cable. So if you wanted to you could download all the episodes you want. That's how I watch The Sopranos ;).

      If you know the post code (Post code) of where you're going to live, you can check if you can get ADSL at https://oms.xs4all.nl/adsl/aanvragen/index.php.

    4. Re:When is it coming to Holland ? by l0rd · · Score: 1

      I hope BBC 1/2 airs it one day (not holding my breath). Commercials can really ruin a series. Anybody who watches 25 on Yorin in Holland knows this....

      If they ever released a TIVO here that would be another question whatsoever ;).....

    5. Re:When is it coming to Holland ? by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2
      Enterprise I has been on German TV, but I don't know how long before they show Series 2.

      It can come even faster on your favourite P2P (ads stripped as well!).

  52. Like a fungus... by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

  53. lucky indeed by slam+smith · · Score: 1

    Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.

    That counts as good luck in my book. A good game sounds a lot more interesting.

    1. Re:lucky indeed by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      There are few things more boring than sport. It's like watching paint peel, but without the exitement.

  54. Re:In my opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The theme song reminds me of Bon Fucking Jovi. Every time.

    I end up muting the entire intro. "Faith! Of the heart!"... um, yeah. Talk about an overdone mass of pretentious musical wanking. Only thing that could have made it worse is a big-hair band, all in spandex, banging their heads and jumping in sync.

    Has our desire to willingly accept anything "sci-fi" or "trek" completely blinded us to absolute banality of enterprise?

    Yes, yes it has. Now if you don't mind, I'm going to try to find Enterprise-2x01-Shockwave_pt2 on the p2p networks!

  55. Re:English, motherfucker, can you speak it? by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I see. Sounds like you're a "special" case.

    I'd suggest trying out the Gnome distro from Ximian, HTH.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
  56. Re:Do you think Gene Roddenberry would like this s by serutan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We tend to forget that people involved with a specific popular thing have a perspsective bigger than that one thing. I don't know if Roddenberry would personally like Enterprise, but I'm certain he would judge it first as a television show and second as Star Trek. After all, he was a veteran writer, director and producer who did plenty of television other than Star Trek. I bet Gene would think pretty well of Enterprise as television, and would certainly allow that this one is somebody else's baby.

  57. Re:Get some priorities! by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    Im sure the souls of the victims have better things to do, like play harps or eat grapes with 72 young virgins, than watch in horror as we enjoy the first episode of the season of Enterprise.

  58. Lone Gunmen by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's all very well and good, but do the Lone Gunmen get killed?

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  59. Re:English, motherfucker, can you speak it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice waste of your +1 bonus there, Sparky.

    How do you figure that Ximian is "Icaza free"? Are you implying that Ximian have stripped out all of the original code written by him?

  60. Cliff-hangers et al. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    Shockwave II is the conclusion to last season's season- ending cliff-hanger

    On other news, Macromedia today announced that it will be sponsoring the season-ending cliffhangers for this season and the next one as well.

    Under the scenario being considered, this season might end with a nailbiting mystery about a Flash, while next season might feature some FireWorks in its finale. Readers will note that this is in addition to a four-hour long episode featuring the Starship Enterprise undergoing ColdFusion.

  61. Re:Get some priorities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be doing my part for world peace by not killing a single person while I watch Star Trek.

    World peace through couch potatoism. Lazy people don't kill people.

  62. lucky me! by motardo · · Score: 1

    I get to wait till saturday to see the premiere!! :(

  63. Re:Do you think Gene Roddenberry would like this s by evilpenguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you notice how much better TNG got after he died? Did you notice that Roddenberry was egomaniac who claimed he had every good idea? Read Harlan Ellison's "City on the Edge of Forever" for a strongly opinionated (from Harlan? No way!) and documented (Harlan kept track? No way!) counter-view of "The Great Bird of the Galaxy."

  64. Trek is in the hands of philistines by f-f-f-f-fuuubar · · Score: 1

    Enterprise is a slight improvement over Voyager, but it won't go anywhere. These are the same Hollywood types who produced Voyager, which had incredibly inconsistent characters, couldn't keep track of where the ship was, and huge plot events evaporated the following episode. They had a brief moment of glory when they introduced Seven, who actually had a character development story arc. Once the ratings went up, it was back to the same old grind.

    I could go on all day, citing chapter and verse, but it would just give me another ulcer. Why can't these idiots write? This is why the Trek franchise will never amount to anything: No one with a brain or a heart is running it, and they wouldn't recognize real writing if it fell in their lunch.

    --
    A sig is a waste of bits.
    1. Re:Trek is in the hands of philistines by operagost · · Score: 2

      Voyager disappointed me because the ship (and the crew) ended seven years without spacedock, as shiny and new as when they left. I was hoping for battle scars, weird hacks, and assimilated alien technology - especially after they picked up a Borg! Where was the mental instability (other that the Captain)? Everyone was just fine with being stuck out there after the first season!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Trek is in the hands of philistines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its unfortunate, as modest as it now seems TOS
      clued me into some physics at an early age. (although they screwed up occasionally).
      I mean they had a black hole presumably before the
      term was common ( referenced as a black sun).
      And I always got the feeling that they were out on a limb truly in as risky a situation as a sailing ship in the 1600s. From TNG to enterprise things have gotten steadily worse, I don't think they have a science advisor that they listen to and I feel more risk and adventure on my 20min commute to work.

    3. Re:Trek is in the hands of philistines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEWSFLASH: They 'borrowed' plenty of borg technology.

      Did you even watch the show? ;P

    4. Re:Trek is in the hands of philistines by operagost · · Score: 1

      But they didn't keep any. They added some kind of Borg plating to the hull in one episode... THEN REMOVED IT FOR NO REASON! They did acquire Borg Transwarp technology... but barely used it because it didn't work well with the Federation tech. They were also having to get odds and ends from various traders... shouldn't they have been stuck with funny almost-compatible parts and have to pull off mad haks in engineering to use them? Maybe it's only because I'm an engineer that I would find that interesting (or funny.. imagine a transporter malfunction doing a sudden site-to-site from the chief engineer's shower to the bridge)!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  65. Hopefully It Won't Suck by Etriaph · · Score: 2
    I love Star Trek, I mean I really do. I've never been able to watch an episode of any of the five franchises and not at the very least enjoy myself. But this whole time travel thing gets out of hand. Berman and Braga have this habit of setting up what could be a really cool show and then they do a "Oh, all we had to do was press this button on the tricorder and we were fine! Dr. Crusher, come rub my bald head!"

    See, they come up with great initial ideas, and then sort of shlop them right afterwards. This is getting tremedously annoying. I don't know what's worse, the pain of waiting for it or the disappointment of the delivery of something horrible. I'll watch, probably enjoy most of it, then go to a coffee shop later and wonder why I put so much faith in two guys who constantly make me feel like an idiot viewer (maybe I am, but I think more than the other guys).

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
  66. Re:Do you think Gene Roddenberry would like this s by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Since Roddenberry's death, there have been what, 400 episodes of the show, 5 movies, and untold numbers of books, comics, etc. Perhaps we've become so inundated with Trek that it's no longer 'beloved'.

    The greatest thing that happened to Trek was when GR was moved to EP. Go look at some of the garbage that was made/produced during his reign. This is primarily season three of TOS and season one of TNG. Utter crap.

    DS9 is easily the most underrated show of all Trekdom. The last few seasons were wonderful. Thanks in no small part to the fact that GR wasn't around to bitch and mess it up.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  67. Re:Get some priorities! by napoleone · · Score: 1

    There are billions and billions of stories in the naked universe, this has been one them.

    --
    mem in MMII
  68. Theme song was written by Borg... by spookymonster · · Score: 1

    ...after they assimilated 10 years worth of Starsearch and American Idol runner-ups.

    Resistance is futile.

    --
    - Despite popular opinion, I am not perfect.
  69. Beverly Crusher! by doublem · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    All that red hair, and the full bosom.

    Spreading gel all over the Vulcan chick.

    Beverly Crusher, Queen of the MILFs

    Mmmmmmm

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Beverly Crusher! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MILFs?

      Care to expand the acronym for us unenlightened types?

    2. Re:Beverly Crusher! by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      MILF= Mothers, i'd like to f***. And yes, I had to ask too.

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
    3. Re:Beverly Crusher! by jachim69 · · Score: 1
      But only if she's been turned into an Irish Setter by Q, first.


      Oh... MILF?

    4. Re:Beverly Crusher! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always did prefer Beverly to the better endowed Deanna Troi. It's the old Ginger/Mary-Ann, (or Bailey/Jennifer) argument if you will. Beverly's compact little dancer's body is much sexier than Deanna's exaggerated one.

      Anyone remember which episode it was that had them both working out in some really sexy leotards?

    5. Re:Beverly Crusher! by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Bailey/Jennifer

      WKRP in Cincinnati, in case anyone else didn't catch it right away. I haven't seen WKRP in ages, and the names didn't click. It took a bit of effort to figure out - a google search on Bailey and Jennifer gets about 98% false hits.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Beverly Crusher! by doublem · · Score: 2

      Oh Yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

      Wore out the damn rewind button AND the tape.

      To bad Gates McFadden never did any nude scenes.

      Perahps she could be temted now. Julie Andrews was older than McFadden is now when she did her first topless scene.

      "Tonight on HBO, Dr. Crusher on Red Shoe Diaries, followed by Real Sex: Trek Edition, Gates McFadden talks about her sex life with live demonstrations"

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    7. Re:Beverly Crusher! by jweatherley · · Score: 2

      The term MILF was used (invented?) in American Pie and refered to Stifler's Mom.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    8. Re:Beverly Crusher! by PyroMosh · · Score: 2

      Never saw real nudes of her, but here's the closest I've ever seen. Sorry for the quality of the scan, I lost the magazine years ago, and I found this one floating around gnutella.

      http://female-ejaculation.com/crusher.html

      I'm sure she's not nude under there, but I've always loved this shot...

    9. Re:Beverly Crusher! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pegasus.

      Don't ask why I know that without looking it up.

  70. Sport by dswan69 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it is damn irritating when they replace entertainment with sport.

    Cancelled my subscription to a local channel after this happened one time too many.

  71. Huh? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    What sports would UPN have to prempt a show?

    1. Re:Huh? by tweek · · Score: 2

      Atlanta Thrashers hockey here. That's if there were a game tonight.

      My girlfriend always got preempted on her WB affiliate back home by the Red Wings. not that she cared because she loves hockey but it interfered with her Angel watching.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  72. They did have one of the best episodes ever...... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IMHO, the episode Shuttlepod One was one of the best Star Trek episodes I've ever seen.

    Basically Reed and Trip are on a shuttlepod out in the middle of nowhere and it looks like the Enterprise has been destroyed. The pod is damaged and they have a very limited amount of air left. And they are light years away from anything.

    It was Sci-Fi at it's best, a human drama between Trip's completely irrational hope (although deep down he knows the truth) and Reed's attempt to prepare for their pending deaths. They deal with things like whether or not to be comfortable and just accept death or be miserable and squeeze out a few more hours.

    I'll take one of those episodes over 10 technobabble shows anyday.

    Brian Ellenberger

  73. 5th Series ! Memory Error by Kryptic+Knight · · Score: 1
    l0key432 writes "Enterprise, Star Trek's fifth series


    Some mistake I think .. lets count

    1. TOS
    2. TAS
    3. TNG
    4. DS9
    5. VOY
    6. ENT

    Did someone forget to count The Animated Series?

    --
    --- This meme is memory intensive
    1. Re:5th Series ! Memory Error by mcwetboy · · Score: 1

      Did someone forget to count The Animated Series?

      That's not a bug; that's a feature.

    2. Re:5th Series ! Memory Error by emir · · Score: 1

      Sometimes after TAS, they decided (roddenbery i think) that TAS shouldnt be made part of star trek universe, dont remember exactly why but it was inconsistent in some way with TOS/TNG

      --
      -- http://electronicintifada.net --
    3. Re:5th Series ! Memory Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 1. TOS
      > 2. TAS
      > 3. TNG
      > 4. DS9
      > 5. VOY
      > 6. ENT

      Now, for $10000, guess which alien culture manufactures processors that use those assembly opcodes!

    4. Re:5th Series ! Memory Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the middle letter of the 6 series spells

      OANSON

      OAN Son would be the son of Oa, plant of the green lanterns!

    5. Re:5th Series ! Memory Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TOS was the zero series. classic fence post error. what kind of geek are you?

    6. Re:5th Series ! Memory Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's commonly accepted that The Animated Series is not considered official canon.

  74. available for days by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    on Dalnet #startrek-central nuff said

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  75. Big Trouble In Little China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best. Movie. Ever. :-)

    1. Re:Big Trouble In Little China by The+Dobber · · Score: 2

      Ranks right up there with Buckaroo Banzai. In fact BTiLC was/is a retooled version of the never executed sequel to Buckaroo. "I've been ionized, but I'm okay now" (BB)

  76. Re:They did have one of the best episodes ever.... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Funny
    "It ain't gettin' any of our bourbon!"

    Ah, finally, a Star Trek character I can identify with -- a drunken engineer.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  77. Being in Canada rocks!!!! by cprice · · Score: 1

    Saw it last night!!!!

  78. Fifth series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So counting the Star Trek cartoon, wouldn't this be the sixth series?

  79. Hoshi in the buff!!! by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    Did you see that 30 second episode teaser?!!!

    All I can say is... "Unnnggghhhhh... ahhhh...."

    I just hope that my Fiance doesn't see me do that drooling tonight...

    -.-

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Hoshi in the buff!!! by nayrbmai · · Score: 1

      We could all use a little more Hoshi in our lives... Just have your Fiance's mother call... That should do for an hour or so...

    2. Re:Hoshi in the buff!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The actress is cute (not hot) but her character is just such a turn-off.

      I mean she rescues slugs from other planets and pets them. Oh wait ...

  80. Saliban? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's run by the evil Osima Ban Luden, right :)

    It's "Suliban", BTW.

  81. Likeable characters? Are you nuts? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    Great premise, likeable characters and good actors.

    Boy am I ever stunned to read this. You actually like the characters? I've always thought that the unlikeableness (is that a word? no? oh well...) of the characters it the main reason why I think the show is below average. I'm curious as to which characters you like. I've always liked The Original Series, even with it's hokey elements, because I respected the characters. I would have loved to serve on board the Enterprise under Kirk because I respected the abilities and personalities of the crew. But here's how I see the Enterprise crew under Archer:

    • Archer: way too anxious to prove the Vulcans wrong. Doesn't stop to think before he does something.
    • T'Pol: For someone who is supposedly devoid of emotions, she acts like a pouty little child an awful lot.
    • 3rd in command (whatever his name is): Whines a hell of a lot.
    • Hoshi: Probably competant in her work but you really can't trust her to keep her head when things get rough.
    • Doctor: Need I say anything here?

    Well, I could go on and on. I understand that this show is supposed to be about mankind's first tentative steps into space so please spare me the follow-up posts telling me that the characters ought to be poor at their jobs. It's just that it's not interesting to me to watch people who seem borderline-incompetant representing humanity in space. I would certainly not want to serve aboard Archer's Enterprise. I would fear for my safety and I sure wouldn't be able to take orders from the meatheads in charge.

    Honestly, people really like the Enterprise crew? I'm still stunned about this. Is it just me who finds this new group as unpalatable as the Voyager group (and, yes, I realize I'm inviting jokes about 'palatable' and how that word relates to 7of9 or T'Pol)?

    GMD

  82. Nothing on TZ? by calgodot · · Score: 1

    You dumbasses are all hell-bent on arguing the virtues of ENTERPRISE which, however bad it may be, is better than no STAR TREK at all. What about Twilight Zone? Absent all these years, re-tooled back to original style with a walking host, the always superb Forrest Whitaker, with his creepy lazy-eye. This is a bigger piece of cultural history than even STAR TREK. I'll watch the new ENTERPRISE - I'll record the new TWILIGHT ZONE.

    --
    --- yr pal cal "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
  83. Re:Likeable characters? Are you nuts? by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    * Archer: way too anxious to prove the Vulcans wrong. Doesn't stop to think before he does something.
    * T'Pol: For someone who is supposedly devoid of emotions, she acts like a pouty little child an awful lot.
    * 3rd in command (whatever his name is): Whines a hell of a lot.
    * Hoshi: Probably competant in her work but you really can't trust her to keep her head when things get rough.
    * Doctor: Need I say anything here?

    What? You mean the characters have (gasp) FLAWS?!?!?

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  84. In my area... by cnelzie · · Score: 1


    UPN is Channel 50 in Detroit. Those... er.. rat bastards keep showing "The Detroit Pistons" or "The Detroit Red Wings" games instead of Enterprise... It really irks me sometimes...

    Hopefully when Digital comes out, you will have a choice of watching Channel 50A (Enterprise) or Channel 50B (Red Wings Hockey)...

    Of course, with my future wife... We will be watching Red Wings Hockey... Which isn't to bad. (After the game is always very nice...)

    -.-

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:In my area... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah! that pisses me off, too. although i don't mind the wings, who the FUCK cares about the PISS-tons chucking a ball at an orange circle.

      seems like the NHL would be able to schedule around Wednesdays, though. bastards.

  85. Pilot rocked, show worse by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    I LOVE the premise. My problem is that I don't feel like they are the first ones out in space.

    Setup: First humans in deep space, only "friends" are the Vulcans that Archer hates.

    Obvious Solution: Find new friends, make new allies.

    Archer's Solution: Piss everyone off, choose moral high ground over allies, make no new friends, etc.

    It's a strange new world, they should start becoming friendly with more powerful races. Instead, he is content to be a jerk.

    The very anti-semetic pro-terrorist episode REALLY offended me. A though-provokative episode showing that the anti-terrorist rhetoric can be flawed would be a GREAT Trek episode, in the vein of some of the ST:TOS episodes. Instead we get a 1-sided episode where there Arab-looking terrorist is a great, friendly guy, and the leader of the anti-terrorist contigent looked very Jewish.

    ST:TNG tackled the terrorism question, pointed out that if Washington lost, he'd have been a terrorist.

    Enterprise is a LOT like Buffy. Most episodes are mediocre, some of them show tremendous promise that they'll be great episodes, but the good ones end with a cheap ending that disappoints. Each week, we tune in, ready for more disappointment... Maybe that should be UPN's slogan. :)

    Alex

    1. Re:Pilot rocked, show worse by Shuh · · Score: 1


      ST:TNG tackled the terrorism question, pointed out that if Washington lost, he'd have been a terrorist.

      Kind of hard to be a "terrorist" without being able to blow up women and children. I think you are looking for the term "rebel soldier."

  86. I'm just glad there _is_ a series 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard somewhere they were planning to can Enterprise after series 1, and that would have been a tragic waste of a good idea. I'll probably have a while to wait till i see series 2 though, i'm in the UK with no digital TV ATM :-(

    I hope they make a series to go after Voyager too, it'd be so cool seeing more of the armour and transphasic torpedoes from the finale :-)

  87. Re:KDE women -- alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now I'm using FVWM. Once you figure out the configuration files, it's great. (Or, if you want real simplicity, go with TWM. I used to use it.)

  88. Re:Likeable characters? Are you nuts? by EvlG · · Score: 2

    I think he means to say, the flaws in the characters are not really matched with enough positive aspects to make them worth watching.

    I really wish they would kill off Hoshi. Every time she speaks, I cringe, because I know she is just going to whine like she is PMSing.

  89. Never mind Twilight Zone by Control-Z · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    I'm watching Fast Lane. If it's half as good as the commericals it should be a blast.

  90. Wasn't that a Voyager episode? by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Wasn't that a Voyager episode, with Torres and Paris stuck in space suits (not even a shuttlecraft) with the ship nowhere in sight and the air running out?

    And wasn't something similar done in DS-9, somewhere in the Delta quadrant before the war?

    This episode might have been new, but the writers keep treading over the same ground.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Wasn't that a Voyager episode? by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Seems to be common with sci-fi movies. I can't think of one at the moment.

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  91. Star Trek:Enlisted Guys Script by Art_XIV · · Score: 2

    Scene: A passage in the Enterprise. Several enlisted men are standing about waiting to go through a door marked "Restroom".

    SM2 (SPACEMAN 2nd CLASS) PETERS: Yeah... 'n so I gotta spend the next 14 days cleaning the bridge.

    SM1 CHUNG: Awww mannn! You got screwed BIG time!

    SM2 PETERS: 'N that ain't the worst of it! So I'm standin' there waiting for PO Snuffy to turn on the freakin' generator, 'n I'm standing there holding the buffer, when alla the sudden Cap'n Archer walks in. He looks at PO Snuffy, points at me 'n goes [Mimics Captain Archer's voice] "Doesn't that spaceman have anything better to do, Snuffy?"

    SM1 CHUNG: [Slapping head in disbelief] Awww no!

    SM3 HERNANDEZ: Noooooooo!

    SM2 PETERS: Yeah... So the PO hides the porncorder while Archer's lookin' at me, and he goes "Peters! Start buffing the deck!!!" and I go "YESSIR!" and I leave the hold, buffer and all.

    CHUNG & HERNANDEZ: [Laughs]

    SM2 PETERS: Yeah. It was pretty messed up. But anyway, the Vulcan-babe-F.O. was with the Captain!

    SM3 HERNANDEZ: Oooooooooo!

    SM1 CHUNG: Man-o-man! I'd like to show her what I had "augmented" on the last shore leave.

    ALL: [Snickers]

    SM2 PETERS: So anyway, it looked like the Captain and FO Hottie were getting ready to
    go to the decontamination room again...

    Suddenly Chief Petty Officer Nixon rounds a corner.

    CPO NIXON: Goddamit you shitheads! Get back to work! NOOOOWWWW!

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
    1. Re:Star Trek:Enlisted Guys Script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the neat things about B5 was they had an episode along these lines, "The View From The Gallery", where a major series of events on the station are viewed from the point of view of a couple of the maintenance men.

      Made for a good episode.

  92. Star Trek is the feces in the television toilet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek==lame, boring, overdone, too long on tv, crappy movies, same plots over and over and over and over and over and over. The fans are need to get lives and should have listened to Shatner when he said "Get a Life!" cuz he was onto something there.

    Enterprise is the worst of the lot (except for Voyager, which is so terrible it can't even be classified as a TV show.) If TV would be a toilet then Trek is the shit that drops in it, and like shit it needs to get flushed away once and for all.

    The Star "lets pretend that all aliens look exactly like a human but with different skin color" Trek horse has been dead for so many years and it still getting whippped! Stop it, put it out if it's misery-don't watch trek and it will go away!

  93. away teams by HighTeckRedNeck · · Score: 1

    Well one thing's for sure. The craft is too small to lose one or two extras on every away team. But one thing I can't figure out. How come the Klingons look like the Klingons from the next generation and not the first. Have they been doing a bit of the time warp. "Lets do the time warp tonight" opps wrong show.

    1. Re:away teams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They went all MIchael Jackson in the original Trek.

  94. hey, a lone gunmen/entrprise crossover!!!! by thenarftwit · · Score: 1

    yeah, the could have mulder and the lone gunmen beamed to the future in a future eppisode of the time wars, they help stop the war and get beamed back before the died!!!!!!

  95. Re:Enterprise sucks ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but it has Jolene Blalock in a tight outfit. That makes up for most of the suckiness.

  96. Please don't ever say that again... by orichter · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're creating a self fulfilling prophecy. You know they get half thier story ideas from Slashdot trolls.

  97. Farscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I rather prefer Farscape than Star Trek. It is more in phase with the "human nature". But Enterprise is really ok.

  98. The Time Travel Crutch by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    This has got to be the lamest long term plot device a Trek series could ever employ because it so cheapens the series on a whole-- The fact that the Pioneers really didn't do it on their own, but had there hand held every step of the way by some time traveling agent. It's sad, really; beyond the bungling they normally engage in they. They are freakin out manned, out gunned and have only one ship on the frontier and the best the script writers can come up with is the happy-go-lucky adventures of the Starship Enterprise?

    Honestly, exploring the frontier should have been enough, with all the technological advancements to be made and races to be encountered. Throw in something wierd here, a hint of a possible temporal cold war there and they should have been set. The Trek history is more than rich enough to sustain a series like this one on it's own. Notice I said hint. Not bathing the viewer in time travel higgly-piggly like the writeres here do. A little forshadowing or chance encounters, but not the bat upside the head like they've been doing. It's sick. I'm not bashing ST:E simply because it's not my ideal, but more because it's just plain sloppy.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  99. Scottie !!!! by hoytt · · Score: 1

    If Scottie was ever the true Scotsman he played in StarTrek TOS and those 6 films, he must have had a storage for his scotch somewhere. A Scot abroad isn't complete without a decent supply of Whisky

  100. Jeffries Lube by hedley · · Score: 1

    We need another eye popping decontamination scene like last year!

    1. Re:Jeffries Lube by MadBurner · · Score: 0

      Ahh-MEN! She's got a great rack.

  101. Preempted by sporting event by Fastball · · Score: 2
    Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.

    Are you ready for some FOOTBALL!!!!!

  102. TiVO KNOWS..... by krb · · Score: 1

    TiVo + Season Pass(Enterprise) + Season Pass(Junkyard Wars) == Happiness

    What, i'm easy to please.

    --
  103. Its on Usenet: alt.binaries.startrek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downloaded it this morning

  104. Re:They did have one of the best episodes ever.... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
    "She's got a nice Bum" was the funniest thing since "I can see my house from here!"

    I still chuckle at both of those...

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  105. Except it had just one small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    .. believability.

    Apparently the NX-01 "bumps into" an alien ship. This is the cause of the debris field that Trip and Reed find.

    See, Trip and Reed are off testing the weapons on the shuttlepod, which needs to be done a long long long long long way away (out of communications, no doubt).

    By the time the two finish their tests and reach the 'meeting point' the NX-01 isn't there anymore because it is so damn important for Archer to ferry the de-shipped aliens home that they strand a warp-incapable shuttlepod out in the middle of nowhere. Hell, Archer doesn't even do the simple courtesy of leaving the poor guys a message of any sort saying "don't go anyplace, we'll be back soon, try not to choke while you're waiting".

    More damningly, we are not even presented with any compelling reasons why the aliens need to get where they're headed right now, nor why Archer can't simply warp to the shuttlepod, cut their weapon testing short, pick 'em up and take the aliens home. He just leaves the meeting point without so much as a "bbiam" message, nor collecting the spare hull plating (what do they patch the hole with? hmm??).

    That, combined with blatant scientific errors like using fingers and mashed potato as hull sealant, body hair growth after death and the supposed "drop your impulse engine and you slow down even in space"... well..

    I suppose it was a good character piece, if two people getting drunk and discussing the local Vulcan ass is 'characterization'.

    I could have gotten into the episode so much more if it wasn't a completely contrived situation. But the fact of the matter is, all it takes is a little bump for brave Captain Archer to strand his two best buddies in the middle of nowhere for three days while he ferries strange aliens someplace unimportant.

    But what the hell! It was a "character" ep! Right??

  106. For the love of God... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    Please tell me they dumped that suck-ass theme song.

    Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  107. "Rule-book" ethics in Star Trek by dachshund · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is also not a matter of "doing." It is just the opposite: Dr. Phlox did not actively attempt to interfere with the natural evolution in action on the planet.

    What's amusing is that the end result of all this moralizing is the Prime Directive. Under that philosophy, the Federation is allowed to help a race provided that their civilization has crossed the arbitrary line of developing warp technology. If the race hasn't quite made it there, then it's just too damn bad for them. Post-warp civilizations' destiny is apparently impervious to interference.

    It reminds me of the strict ethical codes that medical researchers must obey with respect to research animals. When performing experiments on a mouse, for instance, there are strict guidelines one must follow to insure that the animal is treated humanely. If that same mouse jumps off the table and runs out of the room, it immediately becomes "vermin", and you could pluck its legs off one at a time with impunity.

    That's the type of "rule-book" ethics that Star Trek loves. It always irritates me the way Trek episodes always justify their characters actions and make them seem heroic-- there's a token amount of reget, but not enough to get them down. It always struck me that a lot of these episodes should really end with the main characters lying around in a drunken stupor and contemplating suicide.

  108. What about the series Sliders ? by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

    People are bringing up the comparison of the Neanderthals and Homosapiens. Doesn't anyone remember the television series Slider which came on FOX and then moved to the Sci-Fi Channel?

    I think it was the Neanderthals (?) and Homosapiens were living on the same world in one dimension, and either one was the dominant and subjected species and they never got a long. Maybe Enterprise also ripped this plot too!!

    What is they too could live together, but the series never showed that, each was trying to exterminate the other ala Nazi style.

  109. Re:Likeable characters? Are you nuts? by Backov · · Score: 1

    Yep, I like the characters. They're not military caricatures like they were in (early) TNG.. They're not hams like TOS.. They seem real, genuine.. What's not to like? Sure, Hoshi is a little whiney.. But Trip and Malcolm are great. And the captain has a good mix of annoying self-righteousness and childlike enthusiasm.

    Best. Star Trek Series. Ever.

    Seriously.

    Cheers,
    Backov

    --
    In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  110. I want a return of... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    ... the Space Hippies! With Hutch (of Starsky &... fame) playin' his groovy electric space banjo, jammin' with Spock. I bet they could share some heavy space herb, too. That's what I want to see! Yeah! Roddenberry rules!

    --
    That is all.
  111. Why Enterprise is the best Star Trek Series by Anenga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about the rest of you, who are probably a lot older than me (I'm barely 18), but Enterprise is the only Star Trek series I can bear to watch. And I actually enjoy it, and have planned to watch it tonight.

    The reason a lot of you probably don't like it is because it's different from the geeky Star Trek you know and love. This one is more humble, down to earth - more "Human" and contemporary. The technology is actually feasable, and I'm being introduced to the new races and themes. When I would watch Deep Space Nine or Voyager, I would be confused. There was just too much going on, and too much plot which requires you to already know something about Star Trek.

    But in Enterprise, it is much more enjoyable. I am actually being introduced into the Star Trek universe just as the cast "Crew" are. And that's why I enjoy it, and continue to watch it.

    1. Re:Why Enterprise is the best Star Trek Series by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      The reason a lot of you probably don't like it is because it's different from the geeky Star Trek you know and love. This one is more humble, down to earth - more "Human" and contemporary.

      Next Gen was the "geeky" one, followed by Voyager and DS9 (which was a crap Babylon 5 knockoff). The problem with Enterprise is that the universe is badly planned. In the original series, Kirk could swagger around the galaxy meddling in other people's business because he was the captain of the Flagship of the mighty Star Fleet of the powerful Federation. Whereas Archer, in Earth's only starship which is primitive by the standards of other species freely meddles (see the episode where he frees a bunch of alien POWs) with established space powers... and nothing happens. They don't have shields yet but the writers were too lazy to think of an alternative to the "shields failing" plot device so they simply called it "hull polarization" and carried on as before.

      Even the beginning, where Archer is complaining that the Vulcans were holding back Earth by withholding technology... hardly holding them back if they didn't have it! It would have been far better to say that Vulcan diplomats were restricting passage through their space, because now it's saying that humans didn't make it into space on their own. Every episode is "Enterprise outgunned, miracle happens, everyone escapes". Not to mention that the rest of the galaxy seems to be getting along fine... why does anyone need the Federation in the first place, and how did Earth, a backwater, come to be the capital?

      I had high hopes, but sadly Enterprise is actually rubbish. The only Sci-fi worth following in TV at the moment is Stargate. It does the Enterprise premise (ordinary humans venturing into a galaxy that is far more complex and dangerous than they ever imagined) far better than Enterprise does.

  112. The soundFX aren't cool anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with the later Star Trek shows as compared to the originals is obvious. SoundFX. The original was alive with all sorts of cool noises. I especially likes the bridge science station one which sounded like one of those mechanical black flipping toy dogs.

    Boof! Boof! Beep! Beep! Chuff! Whirr! Eeeooop! Woop! Woop! Shhhhhssst! Fooot! Errrrp! Woof! Ping! Chirp! Eeek! Blip! Blip! Eeewwwwwuup! Woof! Woof! Zing! Chufff! Bleep! Buzzzz! Ping! Ping! Wooof! Zip! Plink! Shuffffft! Werrrrt! Wooof! Woof! Eeeeurpppp! Zing! Booof! Booof! Fleeep! Fleeep! Damn...it... Spo...ock! Splurrrt! Woof! Woof! Zip! Bong! Bleep! Bleep! Eeeep! Wizzz! Splat! Bzzzzzzz! Ftzzzzzzt! Bleep! Wooop! Whippp! Errrk! Ping! Gong! Zipp! Zippp! Farrrt! Chuffff! Chuffff! Shuuuzzzzz! Zip! Plonk! Blip! Fritzzzz! Blipp! Fting! Ptawng! Woof! Woof! Fliptang! Eeek! Blip! Blip! Booof! Fleeep! Splurrrt! Woof! Woof! Zip! Bong! Ripppp!

  113. Dr. Crusher, come rub my bald head! by Nindalf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Picard used to dip his bald head in oil, and rub it all over her body.

    1. Re:Dr. Crusher, come rub my bald head! by pianophile · · Score: 1

      Ha! Seinfeld reference sighted. Wasn't it Ghandi originally?

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
  114. That opening title must go -- too American by tekrat · · Score: 1

    I'm not complaining about the Rod Stewart sounding song -- somebody else will likely do it for me.... I'm complaining about the opening title's visuals.

    They are trying to show these space "firsts", like the moonlanding, and the first warp drive ship -- but please, where are the Russians in all this?

    I mean, they show Alan Shepard, which is fine, but where the hell is Yuri Gagarin? If they really wanted to present a history of Earth space travel, it needs to be more balanced.

    Esign Chekov would be displeased with this vision of the Future -- where only Americans have gone into Space.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  115. Lorry/Van by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Britain, a van and lorry are different things- lorry is usually larger.

  116. Time Line Changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rick Berman to writers:
    OK... We have 25yrs or so of history that we can't keep straight anymore. How can we manage this?

    Writers:
    Temporal Cold War changes the time line.

    Rick Berman:
    Poof

    Fans:
    That can't happen yet...

    Rick Berman:
    Yes it can, new Time Line!!!

    Fans:
    &%^&%^&$$&

    Rick Berman:
    What!!! I just changed the rules... just like Kirk

  117. Warning by Locke!Erasmus · · Score: 1
    CmdrTaco has one official warning for trolling due to the inflammatory nature of his story.

    After all, if he hadn't flamed Enterprise in his original story, this thread would be filled with nothing but the highest praise for the show, right?

    --
    I should have picked out the nickname Demosthenes!Tecumseh.
  118. what they _need_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    are some Marines. Bear with me here.

    In the season finale, Archer, Vulcan Chick and Trip did a smash 'n grab on the baddies space ship. Depriving Enterprise of ALL their senior leadership.

    That situation was just crying out for a heavily armed and armoured team of Marines, all of whom know what to grab, and just enjoy the hell out of powerfull and advanced weaponry.

    My .2 cents.

  119. I'm Not Alone!!! by noddyholder · · Score: 1
    Of course with my luck, it'll be pre-empted by some sporting event.


    Someone else has this problem too? And I thought it was just the hayseeds running this chickenshit UPN station here in Charleston that was doing it. I'm not alone!!!!

  120. Enterprise in the UK by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    Anyone know what happened to the Enterprise showings on Channel 4 in the UK this week? Something funny happened at the weekend -- Saturday was a repeat of last week's but there was a new episode in a Sunday slot as well, I think -- but the midweek showing (which I usually watched) seems to have gone. While everyone else is looking forward to/slagging off season two, I'd settle for the second half of season one for now... ;-)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  121. Damn Cable by ari_j · · Score: 2

    My cable network's UPN provider (from 250 miles away, incidentally) became FOX recently, and now it's almost entirely your typical static-plus-warning-message about cable companies being prohibited from carrying duplicate programming (they do carry two TBS's, the bastards), so the only time that FOX is active is when the other one is showing something different. This in the wake of Futurama's cancellation - I'm left with absolutely jack squat for good TV. Well, the History Channel is great; but I mean good fictional TV.

  122. Hoshi goes topless! by UnknownQ · · Score: 1

    That's right, Hoshi loses her shirt in this episode! About time if I say so myself.

    --
    Wherever you go, there you are!
  123. This time you get a topless Hoshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding.

  124. Not thinking through leaves room for new ideas by cmeans · · Score: 1
    Yes, but it's those situations that they (writers etc.) create and haven't yet decided how the characters are going to get out of, where they end up creating new "trek lore".

    A particular instance comes to mind...

    There was an early episode of ST:TOS, with Spock (and probably Kirk et. al.) being detained by some impolite alien (not that Spock isn't an alien...but hey). They (the writer(s)/director) hadn't figured-out how Spock etc. were going to get out the predicament. Nimoy apparently popped-up the suggestion that he touch the guy on the neck (or something like that). Lo! and the Vulcan Neck Pinch was born.

  125. Just watched it... Uuuhhhhgg.... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    There are shows that can waste an hour of your life, then there are shows that can utterly waste an hour of your life and make you vomit afterwards. This is one of those series, this episode in particular was devoid of any redeeming value. I'll sum it up for you:

    Part 1: Crew is interrogaated on Captains whereabouts.
    Part 2: Captain and time agent construct a communicator out of bubblegum and duct tape in the desolate future.
    Part 3: Captain contacts crew, concocts zany plan.
    Part 4: Hoshi crawls around in ducts, emerges topless (can you say "fan service"?).
    Part 5: Captain emerges from future to kick alien butt, Enterprise yet again narrowly escapes a better armed, more numerous foe.

    It's like they purposely built up part one just to make part two so utterly anti-climatic and predictable as to make you want to jab your eyeballs out and never hear the phrase "we're making history with every lightyear" ever again. This was the season premier? All I can say about the writers is that they have a seriously long way to go. We're talking 40 years in the desert long...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  126. Responses to comments on Enterprise by MaverickUW · · Score: 1
    Okay, I haven't seen this first episode yet, but I feel the need to comment on other people's responses to different comments, so here goes.

    Okay, first off, Paramount gives Trek a lot of freedom to not do the 'Everything is fine at the end of the day' thing. For those who payed attention to DS9 starting with the episode "Jem'Hadar," you'll notice DS9 had great freedom to not do the everything is fine at the end of the day. I mean, that episode ended up with the good guys (the Federation), barely escaping with their lives (not counting the Odysssey getting rammed by a ship while it was retreating). The dominion war was a great example of this. Of course in the end it managed to work out, but it took 2 whole seasons to finally resolve once the combat began. Now if that's not waiting a little longer than the end of the day, I don't know what is.

    Sadly I'll mention voyager. Somehow a starship winding trapped 70 years away from Federation space doesn't exactly seem completely wrapped up at the end of the day...

    The Ferengi in Enterprise: Who says history records them as the Ferengi?

    Okay, the last thing I have to mention is those few comments about how Archer and company are out there doing more damage in the end. As we've already seen, the Andorians, who are later allies, but look to be the best of the antagonists in the series. As people pointed out with the temporal cold war thing, the best villans are those who are your friends, or who are goodguys (think about it, in the same way Robin Hood was a Villan). The Andorians have already shown both sides of this, and the series may best be served by showing the continued encounters with the Andorians, and how their anger with the vulcans was eventually resolved to the point that they all became allies and made the Federation... Sure it sounds like Voyager and the Borg, or TOS and the Klingons, but in this case we know that everybody eventually gets along, but how these two races which have very hostile parts to them become this way could be what truly develops this show into some of the best trek.

    I was afraid of Enterprise when I heard Bakula was going to be captain (I loved Quantum Leap, but it just didn't seem right). But I watched anyways, and have decided I like the show, for maybe different reasons then the past series, but I see a lot of potential there. I know you'll say TPTB will screw it up (and I'm sure to some extent they will), but I'm still interested in seeing where it goes from here.

  127. Rut by ZigMonty · · Score: 2
    Enterprise is stuck in a rut. In Australia we're still somewhere in first season and it seems like every second episode involves the Captain being invited to a planet, being captured, beaten up a few times, and then rescued by the rest of the crew. He always has at least one other crew member captured with him. Who this other crew member is seems to alternate among all main characters.

    Seriously, I like the show but every time that idiot accepts an invitation to a strange planet, without some sort of backup plan, I want to hit him.

  128. Re:They did have one of the best episodes ever.... by bungo · · Score: 2

    Not only is it the same story as the Voyager as someone else has already noted, but it appears to be even similar to the TOS episode Galileo 7.

    It was Sci-Fi at it's best, a human drama between Trip's completely irrational hope (although deep down he knows the truth) and Reed's attempt to prepare for their pending deaths. They

    An in the TOS episode, the same thing occured with Kirk and Spock. The had a twist in then end, when Spock performs an irrational action which had little chance of success and which shortened their time in orbit before they burned up, but by a stroke of luck, it worked (amazing, eh?).

    In Shatner's autobio, he said that he started off not liking the next gen episodes, as they were ripoffs of earlier TOS episodes.

    It appears that either all of the plots in existance have already been used in other trek episodes, or the writers just like to rehash old plots 'cause it's easy and it worked last time.

    (Ok, I read the earlier slashdot article which discussed that there are only a few basic plots, like man vs man, man vs nature, nature vs nature, but as far as I know, they haven't done a trek plot of dog vs vampire* - so there's at leat one left).

    .

    * with thanks to the original poster of those plots who refered to Stephen King.

    --
    "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
  129. Few Favorite Quote by RobertNotBob · · Score: 1
    I have a new favorite quote from Star Trek


    I just made the biggest mistake in the history of Time Travel this morning"

    --
    ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
  130. No, it didn't. by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

    .. believability.

    Um, the episode made perfect sense; you just weren't paying attention.

    Apparently the NX-01 "bumps into" an alien ship. This is the cause of the debris field that Trip and Reed find.

    No. The debris was caused by the microsingularity things hitting Enterprise (or hitting the other ship and screwing up the docking procedure, I forget which).

    See, Trip and Reed are off testing the weapons on the shuttlepod, which needs to be done a long long long long long way away (out of communications, no doubt).

    No. The shuttlepod's comm systems got blown out by another of the microsingularities. They mentioned several times that the comm was down; didn't you notice?

    By the time the two finish their tests and reach the 'meeting point' [...]

    No, that's the point; they didn't finish their tests. They had to return to the rendezvous point early because of the damage to the comm systems. Again, they mentioned this at least once.

    [...] the NX-01 isn't there anymore because it is so damn important for Archer to ferry the de-shipped aliens home that they strand a warp-incapable shuttlepod out in the middle of nowhere.

    *sigh* Archer doesn't know the shuttlepod is stranded. He fully expects to be there and back long before the shuttlepod returns to the rendezvous point, and he fully expects to be within comm range of the shuttlepod the entire time (remember, Enterprise doesn't know the shuttlepod's comm systems are down) and to be able to get back in plenty of time if a problem does arise. As far as Archer knew, there was no reason why he shouldn't take the aliens home, or why he should need to retrieve the shuttlepod before doing so.

    He just leaves the meeting point without so much as a "bbiam" message, nor collecting the spare hull plating (what do they patch the hole with? hmm??).

    With the hull fragments that they came back and collected after dropping off the aliens, of course. Why make the aliens wait for days while they patched up the hull? It's not like those hull fragments wouldn't be there when they got back.

    That, combined with blatant scientific errors like using fingers and mashed potato as hull sealant, [...]

    The "fingers and mashed potatoes" were temporary patches until they could get to the proper hull sealant. They even said as much IIRC. And remember, these were micro-breaches, caused by a micro-singularity; fingers and mashed potatoes would have been enough for a short time.

    [...] body hair growth after death [...]

    (shrug) How many people without medical training would have made the same mistake? Besides, weren't they half-drunk by that point?

    [...] and the supposed "drop your impulse engine and you slow down even in space"...

    Um, didn't they come to a full stop before jettisoning the impulse drive?

    [And yes, I fully expect to be mocked as a "squealing fanboy loser" for correcting all this. Look, this was all explained right on screen; it's not my fault you weren't paying attention.]

    --
    sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt