Slashdot Mirror


Buggy Bugging Backfires On German Police

Alethes writes "The BBC is reporting that German police have been caught bugging cellphones at the expense of criminal suspects who found a unknown and inaccessible voicemail number listed on their bills that was being used to record calls. Telecommunications authorities said that nearly 20,000 lines were currently being tapped."

270 comments

  1. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

    1. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumkoff?

      Nien spieken se Deutch...

    2. Re:hmmm... by whovian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ach Du D'oh!

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:hmmm... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Nein!", according to The Simpsons (German).

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:hmmm... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 3, Informative
      what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

      Scheiße - roughly pronounced "Schiess", but I believe "Do'h!" works.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    5. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny
      what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

      Remember Wolfenstein?

      Halt!
      Kommentein!
      Aus Pass?
      Vonsaff!
      You panic and run into a wall:
      ###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!

      Ok, so I KNOW the Vonsaff is wrong..

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    6. Re:hmmm... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe it's roughly:

      Scheißetwaswirklichschlechtesgeschehenundesüberras chtemichgroß

      Used in a sentence:

      Mein Automobil ist defekt. Scheißetwaswirklichschlechtesgeschehenundesüberras chtemichgroß!!!

      (sorry about slashdot breaking the word in two. They obviously have no respect for the German language.)

    7. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sheisse : literal meaning is 'shit'

      Remember that Southpark episode where cartman's mom was in a sheisse movie? but no one knew what sheisse was? Well, that's what it is. Poop.

    8. Re:hmmm... by unicron · · Score: 2

      I was pretty damn sure that nein meant no. When Mr. Burns married Marges mother, the groom side was Barney and an old guy in aWorld War 1 German officer uniform. Barney told him "down in front, and he replied 'NEIN!'".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    9. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recognized some of the german in that part. I think the guy was saying "eat my shit".

    10. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dontcha think Scheiße pretty much covers it?

      Ah German -- a word for everything. What was the one for "that feeling to get when your neighbor's house is on fire"? Ich vergesse.

    11. Re:hmmm... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      sheisse : literal meaning is 'shit'

      Exactally. "The crooks found out we are tapping their phones"..."Shit!" (or replace with "Do'h")

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    12. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Dontcha think Scheiße pretty much covers it?

      Ah German -- a word for everything. What was the one for "that feeling to get when your neighbor's house is on fire"? Ich vergesse.

      Scheiße! Mein freunds casa ist vershekt!

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    13. Re:hmmm... by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're absolutely correct, which just happens to illustrate the fact that in contrast to common belief, The Simpsons is not always correct. It's just that there isn't really a better translation for the "D'oh!" ... "argh", perhabs.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    14. Re:hmmm... by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, my favorite is schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen.

      The English translation would be "tank".

    15. Re:hmmm... by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Babelfish won't translate this unless you insert some spaces in the German. So I entered

      Scheiß etwas wirklich schlechtesgeschehenundesüberraschtemichgroß

      and got this English translation:

      Shit somewhat really bad-happen-and-surprise-me-largely

    16. Re:hmmm... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Ok, so what was teh word that sounded like "Gunnerstchaffel!"?

    17. Re:hmmm... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Ach! Mein leben! :)

    18. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "that feeling to get when your neighbor's house is on fire" = Schadenfreude

    19. Re:hmmm... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Don't remember that one, possibly:

      Schutzstaffel!

      I'm not sure if the spelling's correct, and I think there's an umlaut over the U...

      That was the name of the secret police.

    20. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Nein, nein -- wir sollen EIN Wort finden!

      Perhaps schadenfreude is close enough?

      Uh-oh, here comes the moderator who speaks German. Hide!

    21. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Ach! Mein leben! :)

      I looked that up, and all I found was "Acht, Mein Leiben".

      Which is "8, My Dear" :)

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    22. Re:hmmm... by whovian · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure whether you get a good feeling or an ominous feeling, but if you are taking pleasure is his misfortune:

      Nachbarhausesverbrennungsschadenfreude
      (?)

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    23. Re:hmmm... by Bonker · · Score: 2

      I understood that a significant number of German speaking internet-users use 'ss' instead of the 'spassbe' (sp?) character so as not to confuse computers without an extended character set.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    24. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know how you could tell - I was using an 8-bit sound card - it all pretty much sounded like:

      MMPHWAFFMPH!!

    25. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ach, my life is a better translation

    26. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Warum so viel Slashdotters Deutsch sprechen?

      Don't bother to correct grammar/spelling -- I know I haven't done this since high school. Didn't know I'd face situations like this.

    27. Re:hmmm... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Barney told him "down in front, and he replied 'NEIN!'".


      wouldn't be the currect usage then?

      Hey you in front of me, get down.
      No.

    28. Re:hmmm... by quigonn · · Score: 2

      G'schissena, "schadenfreude" is already an English word, just like hinterland and rucksack (and several others, which I don't remember anymore).

      Anyway, it's really funny to see English-speaking people speaking or even writing German. :-) And then , you can overcharge them by speaking (or writing) one of the German dialects. Mine is the Upper Austrian dialect, so beware. ;-) (sometimes, not even Germans understand me!)

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    29. Re:hmmm... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      I understood that a significant number of German speaking internet-users use 'ss' instead of the 'spassbe' (sp?) character so as not to confuse computers without an extended character set.

      No, they do it because the ess zet (scharfes s)
      is offically depricated and is only supposed to be used for those handful of words where ss doesn't convey the same meaning. That and german youth are fairly americanized using our words and customs a lot of times.

    30. Re:hmmm... by jakobk · · Score: 1

      ß is not deprecated.

    31. Re:hmmm... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who were the ones in charge of this bungled bugging? Col. Klink and Shultz?

      --
      How ya like dat?
    32. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Upper Austrian ... oh Gawd that's one of the most arrogant, and among Germans at that! It amazes me that a country so small could have so many dialects. But it's good to have someone somewhere who makes Americans look modest. ;-)

      Yes, along with a thousand others we've absorbed schadenfreude -- a uniquely wonderful word -- although I doubt 95% of English-speakers could tell you what it meant. At least we had the good sense not to name a company "Fokker." People here were always uncomfortable with that one.

      Oh well, gotta go plan the destruction of the world -- you know, being American and all. And watch what you say on the cellphone, eh? :)

    33. Re:hmmm... by tempfile · · Score: 2

      No, it's not deprecated. The spelling reform just made it a little less widespread.

    34. Re:hmmm... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >At least we had the good sense not to name a company "Fokker."

      Sure, but what about this? At least you tried... :-)

      But this, I don't understand at all. Especially the one in Staines, UK (near the bottom).

      (Not to moderators who don't have much ball bearing experience: Work safe link. Seriously.)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    35. Re:hmmm... by Asprin · · Score: 2


      Remember Wolfenstein?
      ...


      Or, my personal favorite:

      GUTEN TAG! [BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM]

      It's hard to believe that actually scared me at one point in my life, but it did.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    36. Re:hmmm... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Actually it wasn't even 8 bit. The Apple II had a 1 bit speaker just like the PC speaker pre-Soundblaster. A few games like Wolfenstein used it to (barely) play voice samples.

    37. Re:hmmm... by Pius+II. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the german translation for "tank" would be "tank" (Nein!) or "Panzer", the exact translation for that long word would be "trench destruction armored force vehicle".
      In the Bundeswehr something like "Schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen" would probably become something like "SGVPKW".
      I can safely assure you that _noone_ ever uses such words in Germany. They are understandable, but they would be incredibly bad style. In fact, every normal german text could probably translated word-by-word (except for the word order) and would be accepted as a perfectly ordinary text by native english speakers; the same goes for english->german translations.

    38. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Or, my personal favorite:
      GUTEN TAG! [BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM]
      It's hard to believe that actually scared me at one point in my life, but it did.

      Hmmm I was actually referring to Castle Wolfenstein on the Apple ][. That sounds like a Wolf3D quote.

      But I know what you mean. My friend had a pirated copy, and 3 levels wouldn't generate properly. His Apple was in the living room, and after walking through empty floors, with only dead guards laying around, and playing it with no sounds for 15 minutes, an SS popped into a Room and Yelled "Vonsoff!".

      I jumped so high, I about gave HIS MOM a heart attack.
      (She was about 4 feet away from me watching TV).

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    39. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Schadenfreude is only one of several words that has been introduced into English.

    40. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those fucking Germans. How can anyone be into scat porn?

    41. Re:hmmm... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      and if you wanted to record something, one way to do it was to type in a machine language program from a magazine and hook the audio source up to the joystick port - it did work though

    42. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why not type it with the umlaut? Schützstaffel. [Multi_key], [u], ["]

    43. Re:hmmm... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Hey I remember that program from the magazine too! Was it from Nibble? Except it wasn't the joystick port, the one I remember used the cassette port.

    44. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I suppose ... Schadenfreude? Basically the same feeling CmdrTaco would feel if kuro5hin's server facilities burned down.

      --
      +++ath0
    45. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      In the Bundeswehr something like "Schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen" would probably become something like "SGVPKW".

      Oh, the english military gobblespeak is just as bad. You just don't have the lingual option of just merging the words to form new ones.

      Think of the "highly mobile multipurpose wheeled vehicle". HMMWV. Also called M998. Or just Humvee.
      --
      +++ath0
    46. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      You mean that one -ß- i guess. You'd pronounce that "esszett" with a german tongue or "as-cet" with american language.

      --
      +++ath0
    47. Re:hmmm... by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sankt-Florians-Prinzip (Saint Florian principle): ""Heiliger Sankt Florian, verschon mein Haus, zünd and're an!" - "Holy Saint Florian, spare my house, put others on fire". As in "If it has to happen, let it happen somewhere else".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    48. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget the Siemens Tower in Cumming, GA!

      http://www.forsythchamber.org/1024/memberservice s/ showmemberlist.php

      cant give a good link but damn! Talk about Innuendo!

    49. Re:hmmm... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Why do they need to translate "D'oh" into anything? It's not like it means anything other than ""D'oh!"" in English, anyway.
      I mean, the first time I heard Homer say it, I got the meaning without having to consult a dictionary, despite never having heard the expression before, ever.

      Unnecessary translation = D'oh!

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    50. Re:hmmm... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      True story (annotated for nonlocals):

      Back in the 20s, my grandfather, from Oberschlesien (Upper Silesia, now Poland), went to the University in Muenchen (Munich). After a week of listening to people speaking Bayrisch (Bavarian), he writes a letter home to his mother expressing shock at the number of foreigners in Muenchen -- in fact, he has yet to meet a German in the city, after an entire week!

      Of course, he *was* an absent-minded professor type, but still...

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    51. Re:hmmm... by 1nfern0 · · Score: 1

      accually that was the movie. when the kids post a message on the message board for la resistance. yep

    52. Re:hmmm... by unicron · · Score: 2

      Actualy, it does have meaning, it's Homer's brain not able to decide between "damnit" and "oh crap".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    53. Re:hmmm... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      umm.. there isn't an umlaut there.

      --
      Free as in mason.
    54. Re:hmmm... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      and wouldn't a slashdotter be a "Schrägstrichpunkter" in german? *g*

      --
      Free as in mason.
    55. Re:hmmm... by hkl387 · · Score: 1

      I think it was

      Luftwaffe!

      ("Air Force", literal translation would be "Air Weapon")

      The Schutzstaffel (SS, not ßß, he) was something between a paramilitaristic elite police and and elite soldiers (Waffen-SS)

      The secret police was the GeStaPo (Geheime Staatspolizei, "secret state police")

      Phew!

      By the way, in no country more telephones are wiretapped by the state than in Germany.
      Germany is one of the very few countries in Europe that doesn't have yet passed an information freedom law.

    56. Re:hmmm... by G�tz · · Score: 1

      Wrong, they searched the web for clit:
      10 million hits, first one featuring Cartman's mom in a porn movie.

    57. Re:hmmm... by pit_bull · · Score: 1

      Fokker is a dutch company.

      You know, the country that had a minister-president called Kok?

      --
      _ Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.... -
    58. Re:hmmm... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Well, "d'oh" (especially the last part) sounds rather English / American, IMHO. Just importing the word straight off may not work very well.

    59. Re:hmmm... by Grab · · Score: 2

      You ever been to Britain? Accents R us!

      Grab.

    60. Re:hmmm... by rEWDBOi · · Score: 1

      My favorite "German" word is "Ausgeschnitzel". Which is not a German word, really.
      It appeared in one of the early Indy-Jones adventures on Amiga written on a torpedo on a German sub.
      We quickly adopted it into our own special style of German, meaning something like "broken" as in "Don't use that bathroom, it is ausgeschnitzel".
      FYI, I am German. But back then, our special language consisted of quotes from the German translations of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes and Hape Kerkeling movies.
      We even developed our own martial-arts style called Hübnern. But don't get me started on that..

    61. Re:hmmm... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      farfenpuken!

    62. Re:hmmm... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      You're right about the cassette port... -- I miss those magazines

  2. Re:My Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fo shizzle my nizzle yo!

  3. Jah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ve have vays of making you talk.

  4. Oops! by natron+2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How in the hell do you manage to do this? I can understand if it was done by a hacker or novice phone tapper. These guys are supposed to be pros. I guess you could say that their cover is blown. Funny Germans.

    1. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laugh it up, American-boy, your 'superpower' got a hole blown in a 'supercarrier' by a goat herder on a raft, and I seem to recall 3 planes slamming into buildings, one of them the nerve center of your 'superpower military might'.
      At least the Germans are funny and don't go around posturing to the world about how big their penis is.

    2. Re:Oops! by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

      The USS Cole was hardly a supercarrier. It wasn't even a plain old Aircraft Carrier. It was just a standard, run of the mill Guided Missile Destroyer.

    3. Re:Oops! by HedRat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny Germans.

      Indeed. My wife is half German and half Mexican. It seemed like a good idea at the time. I never realized how quickly I'd get tired of sauerkraut tacos.

    4. Re:Oops! by mosch · · Score: 1

      actually it still is a guided missile destroyer. It was recommissioned a little more than a year after it got attacked.

    5. Re:Oops! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      The Cole wasn't even armored (Since the US Navy doesn't have any armored ships in commission other than the Aircraft Carriers). The Cole is what the Navy refers to as Tin Cans for a reason, they have lots of firepower, but depend on their active defenses excessively (Phalanx and the SM-2ER missiles). Think of the outrage if they had actually sunk the attacking craft before it blew up.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    6. Re:Oops! by _Spirit · · Score: 2

      From what I recall from an article about this, the technical details are handled by the phone company, they are required by law to have an infrastructure in place that can forward conversations to the police. The police just show them the paperwork and tell em which lines to tap. Sounds like the phone company involved is going to be in deep sh*t and the police isn't to blame.

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    7. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a euphamism for oral sex?

    8. Re:Oops! by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      [sauerkraut tacos] Is that a euphamism for oral sex? (half german/half mexican)

      I believe that's a wetback blitz.

    9. Re:Oops! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --sauerkraut tacos--

      Tacos aren't actually Mexican although you can find them there. They are Texan.

  5. The news here is by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that they got caught. German laws allow for this, Sloppy work on the part of either the telecom company or the police (or both). If its one thing American Inteligence ( homebound anyway) is good at is keeping the public unaware of these types of things. Is that a good thing? Thats an agrument for another post.

    1. Re:The news here is by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      makes one wonder if this was a telecom employee's (read:sysadmin) way of getting back at the police, for getting a ticket....

      quote "give me a ticket, eh? well, we'll just let everyone know your little secret mister cop"
      --this is when said person adds voicemail box to all tapped phoneline bills with simple perl script....

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    2. Re:The news here is by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      german laws allow making people pay something they don't order? (ie, phonecompany would have to to be able to categorize what it's billing it's customers anyways, how are they going to explain, "you pay 4$ for 'special services'" "-i didn't order any!" "well but mr. klotz from berlin police did".)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:The news here is by Jump · · Score: 1

      A german private mobile phone company made the misstake (it's called O2). I guess somebody has big trouble now. One might think tapping phone lines is bad, but given the fact what criminals can do using mobiles I think it is ok.

    4. Re:The news here is by christoph_s · · Score: 1
      Sloppy work on the part of either the telecom company or the police (or both)
      it was an error of a new version of the accounting system of the telecom company. didn't check if the bbc-article pointet this out, but a lot of posts indicate that it didn't...
  6. Headline by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This headline is almost good enough to be a contender in the Favorite Past Slashdot Headline.... poll!
    Buggy bugging, ha!

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  7. Great by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they've given Ashcroft an idea to both monitor possible terrorists AND increase revenue for the US govertment...

    Record all of their conversations in voicemails, then charge them for the priviledge. Go Patriot Act! :)

    1. Re:Great by rczyzewski · · Score: 1

      Where do you think the technology and idea probably came from?

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      There seem to be a few serious misconceptions in how this article is presented. The first is the idea that the police were "caught" wiretapping innapropriately... if you read the article it appears that the wiretaps were legal, the issue is that these suspects found out they were being tapped because this mystery number suddenly appeared on their bill.


      Misconception numero duo, that the German police were attempting to charge suspects for their being wiretapped. No, if you (once again) read the article it is clear that these suspects being charged on their bills WAS the screwup. Obviously the German Police did not want these potential baddies to get a mystery charge on their cell bills and tip them off to the fact that they were being bugged.


      Finally, it doesn't appear to be, at least completely, the German Police's fault. What happened is, they fiddled their mobbys (the article doesn't spell it all out but by all appearances with an appropriate warrant and the cooperation of the phone company) so that when they made a call it would hook up and record the convo into a voicemail box. The phone company upgraded the phone software and the upgrade was incompatible: the bug made the caller get charged for the hook-up to the voicemail box, and that charge tipped them off that something was fishy. Oops.

    3. Re:Great by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Better yet, bounce them to 900 numbers or obscure Carribean ones that charge you an arm and a leg before you figure out what's going on.

      After all, these are just terrorists, right?

      I had no idea a cellphone tap was this easy, or this easy to screw up.

  8. Free call? by philibob · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's listed on their bills... I just hope they weren't charged for it.

    1. Re:Free call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking from experience, phone calls TO a(n) cell phone ('handy' in Germany) are not charged against your minute plan. The cost is charged to the party making the call, at a rate different than the local and long distance rates.

    2. Re:Free call? by McFly69 · · Score: 2

      No man. They charge me 6 Euro for it. I am fighting with Vodafight to refund those charge and the 900 number charges that just "appeared." Of coruse I am not going to admit I called them :)

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  9. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    what exactly is a mud-person?

  10. inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Inaccessable? Most voice-mail systems use a 5-digit password. Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5" (many detectives from the Montreal Urban Police, for example).

    Hacking most voicemail boxes is so simple because of the simple password.

    Not to mention war-dialing the number trying all possible passwords from a land line.

    1. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5"

      That's the combination for my luggage!

    2. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by soup_laser · · Score: 1

      Oh No! Mine too! I think there is a DEA/FAA conspiracy. Must be part of the new Homeland Security dept's activities. Is there PGP for luggage?

    3. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Exedore · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, I suppose they could figure out a way into the mailbox, but all they would hear are the conversations they've already had.

      "I said what?!? To who?!? Ohhh, I'm so mad... just wait 'till I get my hands on me!

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    4. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not just their conversations, bot others as well.

      That's what happened up here. Guys were punching into the cops' voicemail, hearing them talk to their informants, making dates with their mistresses, giving their wives excuses for being late so they could keep their "date" with their mistress, etc.

      Very embarassing

    5. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Is there PGP for luggage?

      Yeah, it's called a booby trap.

    6. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boobies! I wannit! I wannit!

    7. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Exedore · · Score: 1

      The article is kind of sketchy on details, but I just naturally assumed that there wouldn't be just one central voicemail to which all conversations are recorded... that would be rather tedious to sort out, wouldn't it? More likely, each tap had its own mailbox.

      But like I said before, the article is kind of skimpy on details. Anyone find another source somewhere?

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    8. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      they could figure out a way into the mailbox, but all they would hear are the conversations they've already had.

      And delete them. "Press 3 to delete all pending messages." *bleep*

      So much for the evidence.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  11. Big Bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not surprising. I saw a program that said before the wall came down East Germany had something like 80 - 85% of the population under surveillance.

    1. Re:Big Bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not surprising. I saw a program that said before the wall came down East Germany had something like 80 - 85% of the population under surveillance

      America wants to hold all world records. Ashcroft et al will make sure that they break this one.

    2. Re:Big Bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what's a former security worker to do? It was mote like one-third of the population was involved in surveilling the rest! Some Russian officials once visited East Germany and were scared, as Zee Germans had perfected it to a degree the Russians never imagined!

      It's probably happening here in the good ol' US of A, probably on a far larger scale.

      Now be a good drone and go back to your life of producting for the hive.

  12. Coming to a town near you by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a something related to chew on . . . especially after last nights election results.

    "A little-known amendment in the Senate version of the bill makes it much easier for ISPs to disclose e-mail communications without being served with a warrant, which had been prohibited before the Patriot Act of 2001." - wired

    Check it here

    1. Re:Coming to a town near you by saskboy · · Score: 1

      AOL was also sued successfully by a Hong Kong company, for the to release the real name of a mouthy user who badmouthed the company's stock.
      Seems the States will soon being looking like Germany?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Coming to a town near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . especially after last nights election results.

      Hey wanker! WTF does last nights election results have to do with your posting?

      Wanker.

  13. It is too bad that this did not happen in England. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

  14. Who are you worrying about? by Havokmon · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    How many people are concerned that German police MAY have been involved in illegal wiretapping?

    Now, ask yourself if your concerned with the quality of the software doing your billing at any number of companies..

    "Whoops, we didn't intend to share your personal data with 'Spammers-R-Us', it was a technical glitch during an upgrade. Sorry."

    Maybe if the German police can levy some damages on the phone company, we can feel better about other companies making sure that what they say is private, stays private.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  15. Yo by ch-chuck · · Score: 0, Troll

    schizz it.

    (patience, it's slow even before /.ing)

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word to the wary or curious, above link just converts page to Snoop Dogg lingo.

    2. Re:Yo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh....my....god...

      thank you so much for that link. that is hilarious!!!

  16. Schultz - "I see nothing...I know nothing" by bje2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    no wonder the germans were dumb enough to get caught doing this...i mean, c'mon, they never caught onto the old radio transister in the coffee pot routine...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  17. It's worth it by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 0, Troll

    Giving Germany's extremely liberal immigration laws, Al-Qaeda has established quite a foothold in the country.

    The German police aren't trying to listen in on private phone calls -- they're trying to snatch terrorists who are plotting attacks against Americans. Al-Qaeda cells coordinating international terrorism is an everyday occurence in many German cities, and the police should do everything they can to save lives from murderous attacks.

    Remember: Mohammed Atta and his crew of butchers, who murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11/01, plotted the entire scheme in Germany. The fact that the tapping showed up on the phone bills is not a good thing -- it's sloppy work, and it could mean lives lost to terrorism.

    1. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DO YOU EVER STOP YOUR KARMA WHORING?

      You're fat (you said it yourself in your journal). Go back to AOL with the rest of the herd.

      Don't get me wrong, 9/11/01 was a sad day, but we don't need/want your commentary. Look at the replies to your post (and since most of them will get modded down w/the trolls(along with this one), browse @ -1), all of them say the same. All you are is a karma whore. Spread your legs for the karma. Quit trying to pass off that pseudo-intelligence. We're all on to you.

    2. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are you getting your news from? FOX? this all a load of made up crap. Get your facts srtaight please. Germany is not a liberl immigration country and they are one of the last places that they can hide in the EU.

    3. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorists are much like hackers and there will always be an exploit. I would rather die in an act of terrorism so that the civil liberties of my friends and family and countrymen were protected, rather than give them up for a little extra security. Any true American would agree. "Give me liberty or give me death."

    4. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because she's fat she has nothing of relevence to say? WTF? How old are you?

      What is the median age of /. posters anyway? 5?

      Well you certainly aren't mentally over 5 anyway. Why don't you go back to kindergarden and learn how to behave properly in a social group.

    5. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, nowhere in the article did it say that al-Qaeda was specifically being targeted. While I'm sure that suspected members of al-Qaeda have been bugged, in the article, it said that "dozens of criminal suspects" found that their phones were bugged. Yes, just "criminal suspects." And these are only suspects. They may not be trying to listen in on private phone calls from people like you and I, but that's what they risk doing in the process. Sure, this may help prevent crimes, but it can also invade privacy. SO the question is: where do you draw the line? And I don't think there are any easy answers to this question.

    6. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... I'm so glad I'm not the only one who has noticed this user, I've never said anything, thinking it wouldn't matter or that no one else notcied this person. Her account needs to be cancelled.

    7. Re:It's worth it by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2, Informative

      -Remember: Mohammed Atta and his crew of butchers, who murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11/01, plotted the entire scheme in Germany-

      News to me - where did you get this piece of information, please?

      --
      It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    8. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God! Finally, someone on Slashdot who understands the need to give up certain civil liberties to defend our country against evildoers who wish to destroy the freedom that our countrymen fought long and hard for! That it occurred in a country where this is perfectly legal is not germane (no pun intended), the sentiment is there. Would that we were on the right track (though the Patriot Act puts us firmly upon that road).

      I applaud the Germans for their keen vision in the 21st century. Hopefully they will work the kinks out of this so they can go back to bugging people silently without bothersome judicial review. Let freedom reign!

    9. Re:It's worth it by jpm165 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Terrorists are much like hackers and there will always be an exploit. I would rather die in an act of terrorism so that the civil liberties of my friends and family and countrymen were protected, rather than give them up for a little extra security. Any true American would agree. "Give me liberty or give me death." "

      I agree. I would rather have you die in an act of terrorism than to give up my civil liberties...

    10. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read her fucking bio, cock

    11. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sloppy work is not a good thing regarding September 11.

      A liberal law however is a good thing: The quota of germans living on welfare or in jail is lower than the quota of americans in jail. At least we try to deal with problems instead of locking them away!
      And having incompetent cops in breaking privacy at least makes me feel a little bit more secure in my privacy.

      There's much more in life than tracking terrorists: www.septembereleven.de

    12. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To OP: what a tool...

      Now follow the others off the cliff like a good little lemming...

    13. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another beautiful troll by the lovely SexyKellyOsbourne. Keep up the great work.

    14. Re:It's worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking that it might be worth giving up my civil liberties to have you die.

  18. German police wiretapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to remember something about this on Yahoo, the link is here, the article is a bit dated I believe but is still relative to this case. What a gross injustice to humanity. It seems that no matter where we are in the world, the government is watching us...

  19. Installing new software by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    They should have read that SP3 EULA more carefully.

    "...GIVES US THE RIGHT TO BLOW ALL CURRENT AND FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS"

  20. Uh huh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said"

    Any idea what Service Pack it was? :))

  21. And to think it was a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What he meant to say was "Rubber Baby Buggy Bumpers" ten times fast.

  22. I'm not sure what's worse.... by innosent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The software errors/stupidity that let the alleged criminals find out they were being tapped, or the fact that we don't have those errors here in the US. Not that I do anything wrong, but I'd still prefer not to be monitored by the government. This reminds me of a /. article a while back about the US taking bids for a central repository of personal information. It may sound like a great idea to the politicians, but after a while they're going to need money, and guess what?... Then everyone's personal information is up for sale. Telcos have been doing this for a while, even my university (UCF) does this, and I get a few dozen porn/marketing spams a day, just because they have my email address in their records. And you thought spam was a problem now....

    --
    --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    1. Re:I'm not sure what's worse.... by Nicolai+Haehnle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is something I've been thinking about lately. May sound weird by some, but it should be possible to find out whether you've been bugged (pardon the pun) by the police. Obviously, they won't tell you as long as the investigations are still going, but it would be _very_ interesting to know afterwards.

      A good friend of my mother had been in regular contact with some RAF terrorists back in the '60s or '70s - AFAIK neither my mother nor said friend were actually involved in anything though. If I were in a situation like this I'd be curious to know how much the police has got in their archive about me.
      Anyway, I don't think many people on Slashdot know details about German law, so I guess I'll have to find out myself whether this is possible...

    2. Re:I'm not sure what's worse.... by paule9984673 · · Score: 1
      In Germany, you have no right to know wether you have been bugged - not even (or rather: especially) when it was a mistake.

      Although the recordings have to be erased if they did not produce court relevant material, they are usually not, since only the police knows about them anyway.

      It is a German tradition to regard the citizens as tributaries. That's why we dont have any conspiracy theories - there's no need to conspire against someone who you regard as property.

  23. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    This would have never happened back in the good old days of Hitler!

    Very funny. My grandfather died in Auschwitz.

    He got drunk and fell out of his guard tower.

  24. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Eccles · · Score: 1

    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    If it happened in Bavaria, we could say it backfired on Bavarian Bundespolizei..

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  25. Amazing by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5"

    That's the same combination I have on my luggage!

    --
    "You get what you pay for after all." --
    1. Re:Amazing by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      Aha! Another fan of Spaceballs!

    2. Re:Amazing by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Spaceballs!?!
      Oh, shit. There goes the neighborhood.

    3. Re:Amazing by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I see your schwartz is as big as mine...Lets see how well you "handle" it.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:Amazing by espo812 · · Score: 1

      That's the same combination I have on my luggage!

      What do you know, the number for the voice mail was 1-800-DRUIDIA

      --

      espo
  26. This was for mobile phones? by dubious9 · · Score: 1

    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    Don't you just have to sit and listen somewhere to tap mobile phones? You should be able to discretely listen to mobile phones(with the blessing of the teleco's) easily. The bug must have been somewhere in the overhead of logging thousands of calls.

    Since the bug is probably in the overhead and not the actual tap itself, the teleco would probably be the party at fault.

    --
    Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    1. Re:This was for mobile phones? by mijok · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not quite. All countries in Europe use the GSM network - digital with encryption, packet switching etc. security features (search "GSM encryption" on google if you want more information). So it's much harder to tap into that than to any POTS. Thus it's the obvious that the police goes through the network operator.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    2. Re:This was for mobile phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Besides, which is easier, following 20,000 different suspects around everywhere with portable recievers (assuming all the encryption and channer switching and stuff isn't a problem), or having all tapped phone calls automatically sent to the police station, similar to what they already do with tapped landlines?

    3. Re:This was for mobile phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why receivers? Most mobile conversations are clearly audible at least 100 yards away.

  27. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    what exactly is a mud-person?

    A person of colour. Otherwise known as Spook, Nigger, Porch Monkey or Obsolete Farm Machinery.

  28. READ SexyKellyOsbourne Journ al and BIO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STOP MODDING THIS FREAK UP! Have a look at her Journal and Bio and you will see that this Karma Whore doesn't have anything of any importance to say. SHE IS A TROLL!!!!!! I don't have to make this up, read the BIO and Journal, its all there!

  29. Quote... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Funny

    Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb! - Dark Helmet

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
    1. Re:Quote... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Ooh...my sig...
      Yay!

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  30. Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Two senior security staff at Finnish telco Sonera have been remanded in custody, charged with breaching customer privacy by allegedly riffling through private telephone records in an attempt to identify an internal mole

    Read the rest here. Now, I consider this worse - you can expect policy to breach privacy - but you are not supposed to expect that from a major telco....or...actually...are you?

    1. Re:Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 2
      policy

      s/policy/police/

    2. Re:Related News from Finland by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      "Now, I consider this worse - you can expect policy to breach privacy - but you are not supposed to expect that from a major telco....or...actually...are you?"

      No, you aren't, but to be fair Sonera seems to have handled this incident pretty gracefully instead of covering up for the few employees that are suspected of the crime: "The NBI investigation was launched recently at Sonera's own request". I think this says more about the company than the breach itself.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    3. Re:Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 2
      The NBI investigation was launched recently at Sonera's own request".

      Ofcourse, after the breach had been already made public by Helsingin Sanomat. Anyway, yes, I agree - it's better that this is discussed publicly - than kept secret. Oh, and to me it's the same which telco it was - the interesting part is that atleast now everyone knows any company can get caught for it. Also, hopefully this makes the BOFHs at all the gazillion ISPs consider their acts before lurking customer emails - it still the same issue even though the media is different.

  31. There is no limit to what we should do! by reverendG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The German police believe that over 20,000 people need to have active wiretaps on their phones?

    German authorities can only use wiretapping in serious cases such as murder, money laundering, kidnapping or treason.

    I think that when there are this many people who are being monitored, there's a problem. Just take a moment and think about the number of people it takes to monitor and administrate that level of surveillance!

    --

    Why should I argue rationally with someone being irrational? I'll just mock them instead.
    1. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by tempfile · · Score: 2

      This seems to be a result of the "security package" legislation after September 11. They liberalized wiretapping, and even home searching, I believe. I should read that law some time. Before 11/9, the police needed a court warrant to do this in most cases, but now they can do a lot more by suspection. A bit sad in a country that has phone and mail secrecy in its constitution, but the public didn't care.

    2. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by Jump · · Score: 1

      Let me see, ~80 million people, that's 80 000 000 / 20 000 = 4000 observers per criminal.

    3. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Let me see, ~80 million people, that's 80 000 000 / 20 000 = 4000 observers per criminal.

      Geeez

      Let me see, ~80 million people, that's 80 000 000 / 20 000 = 4000 observers per criminal suspect

    4. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by penfold69 · · Score: 1

      So, anyone thinking of relocating to Germany then? The country with 20k 'serious' criminals that need wiretapping.. I'm just on my way to buy an airline ticket........ OUT!

      --
      Beer Coat: The invisible but warm coat worn when walking home after a booze cruise at 3 in the morning.
  32. Jeez... by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    The Gestapo'd be embarrassed by these lightweights....

    I bet Hogan is behind it all!

    I can hear it now ... 'HoooGAAAAAANN!'

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  33. Illegal? by wiredog · · Score: 2

    How so? Even in the US it would be legal if the police had the proper warrants.

    1. Re:Illegal? by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How so? Even in the US it would be legal if the police had the proper warrants.

      Err No.

      A software glitch displayed information that was supposed to be private. I want to see posts on where the responsibility lies for 'software glitches'. Not "My privacy was invaded illegally". So far I can only see that there were 20k taps total, dozens in Germany. Home, Work, Cell. 3 per person. That gives you approx 6 thousand people total, say 'Telecommunications authorities".

      But that's not the issue, I don't care about the legality of the taps, I want to know what the company has to give up because of their 'glitch'.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  34. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by AftanGustur · · Score: 5, Informative
    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    Unfortunately, no

    It is illegal for the UK media to report on incidents that involve national security.

    Yeah, yeah, laugh as you want, you can even claim that it's rediculeus to claim it has anything to do with national security, laugh while you still have the right..

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  35. Dupe! by xchino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot has made an unauthorized copy of a previous post. The RIAA will prosecute to the fullest extent the DMCA provides...

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  36. Installation of New Software? by airrage · · Score: 2

    A couple of things seem rather odd to me, 1) Why do you need a voicemail to track callers (I do not profess to understand the underlying workings of cell-phone infrastructure). 2) They installed new software that cause the problem, but it really only showed up on the invoicing system? So did the install a new invoicing system? Sounds like they don't have their hacking all that together over there....but just my gut instinct. Maybe someone could shed some greater light on the subject...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Installation of New Software? by allism · · Score: 2, Informative

      The voice mailbox was not to track callers, it was to record phone conversations on the phone lines. The billing for the voice mailbox was not supposed to show up at all, but after the software upgrade the owners of the phone lines started being charged for the voice mailboxes that were being used to record their phone conversations, even though they were not actually able to retrieve messages from the mailboxes.

  37. Wouldn't it be funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this software had spyware?

  38. Re:It's worth it-Sides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is your statement a condemnation of Germany's poor immigration policies? Or an advocacy of Germany's poor civil right's record? Remember ANYTHING can be justified by those magic words "In the name of..." Just ask Ashcroft.

  39. If only... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The charge had been listed as a phone sex number, there wouldn't have been a problem.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  40. And with the german goverment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expect more back firing

    linux ist nicht gut fur die welt

  41. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The German translation of the Simpsons ist very sitty, that's a well-known problem.
    Futurama is even worse.

  42. WTF?? by Ted_Green · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "Remember: Mohammed Atta and his crew of butchers, who murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11/01, plotted the entire scheme in Germany."

    Where the hell are you getting this? One of Mohammed Atta's possible places of residnece was Hamburg, Germany. But so was florida. In fact, Florida was one for Waleed Alshehri, Wail Alshehri and Abdulaziz Alomari. Who *all* happened to be on AA #11 Boeing 767.

  43. Balderdash by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The police ARE trying to listen in on private phone calls, in the hopes of finding something there. Would you say police seaching private homes was OK simply because they're only looking for criminals? Not if you believe in any form of privacy.

    "Al-Qaeda cells coordinating international terrorism is an everyday occurence in many German cities" -- you have direct knowledge of this? I haven't seen it reported anywhere. Maybe we suspect it is "an everyday occurrence" but suspicion without evidence is nothing, and acting on that to monitor 20,000 numbers would be harassment. Police doing "everything they can" would logically include what besides phone taps? Fighting terrorism is a worthy cause, but trashing everything we believe in to do it is not.

    Give blame where blame is due, but nothing is gained by mindlessly rounding up the usual suspects. Al Queda is evil, and so is an authoritarian police state.

  44. The suspects! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    The problem was they were billing the "suspects" not the criminals in jail with phat bank accounts!

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  45. Worth Pointing Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This article from 1998 indicated that Germany has had suspected criminals under surveillance for quite some time. So this shouldn't come as much of a surprise. In fact, it was said that several nations in the EU had similar policies in that article. If that is true, then this isn't a good time to be a civil libertarian. Big Brother is watching quite a few of us.

    Now here's something to think about: These German police who conducted this were up so sloppy that the bugging information showed up on phone bills. So: how many governments are doing this the right way (i.e. without the public's knowledge?)

    1. Re:Worth Pointing Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >These German police who conducted this were up so sloppy that the bugging information showed up on phone bills.

      It was the telco's fault, not the police.

      Learn how to read AC.

    2. Re:Worth Pointing Out by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      From Pulp Fiction:

      LANCE

      She ain't my fuckin' problem, you fucked her up, you deal with it -- are you talkin' to me on a cellular phone?
      VINCENT
      Sorry.
      LANCE
      I don't know you, who is this, don't come here, I'm hangin' up.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  46. Too bad they bombed the Bundestag by daves · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... it could have made for a better headline.

    --
    People who disagree with you are not automatically evil, greedy, or stupid.
  47. Um.....That Sux by syntheticsanityOS · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Um.......i guess we have no rights online or on the phone, at least they don't.

    1. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 1, Troll
      Um.......i guess we have no rights online or on the phone, at least they don't.

      Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

      -Brent
    2. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ummm how hypocritical is that?

      Why should they have rights?

      Everyone should have rights.

      Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right?

      What the hell is wrong with you. You're like every other idiot in this country that thinks "Well G Dubbaya is taking away rights of certain people so that I can keep mine and live a happy life." It reminds me of something I read a while ago -

      In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and still I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.

      If you change communists to terrorists, jews to muslims, trade unionists to hackers, you basically have the situation of today.

    3. Re:Um.....That Sux by karlm · · Score: 2
      Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

      Noce Troll, you got me. Good idea. If we take away thier right to a torture-free interrogation, we'll find that nearly 100% of the accused criminals confess to their crimes and we can execute them there in the interogation room.

      There are reasons you can't take away any of someone's rights until they're convicted by a jury.

      Oh, and it's a slippery slope. One day accused terrorists are held for just a month or two without being charged, a few years later they sodomize you until you confess to driving under the influence back in 1973, you dirty scum of a degenerate human you.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    4. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      If you change communists to terrorists, jews to muslims, trade unionists to hackers, you basically have the situation of today.

      This idea of "protecting" and "defending" criminals who will then return the favour by doing all they can to destroy us is preposturous. That seems to be like saying that you should stop the government from finding and punishing the person who burglered your neighbors house. After all, if the government is willing to go after those who steal property, they'll surely go after those who own property next. In the meantime, Mr. I've-Protected-You-To-Protect-Me comes around to burgler your house.

      No thanks, I'll have none of that scenerio. I'll use my liberties in this democracy to strongly defend not only those people who would take away my liberties, but also to keep a government that will protect my liberties using every possible measure available. And I think that based on the elections results yesterday that most Americans agree with me.

      We live in a good situation here. I can't wait for these 2 strong years of further strengthing ourselves against those who are bent at our destruction.

      -Brent
    5. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

      Ok whatever, live in a dream world where your liberties are protected by having them taken away by the government. I think based on the current president that most Americans are fucking retarded.

    6. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

      This idea of "protecting" and "defending" criminals who will then return the favour by doing all they can to destroy us is preposturous.

      Actually I was talking about protecting and defending your rights and the rights of other people. You don't seem to understand what's going on in this country, do you realize how many people were arested in NYC the weeks following 9/11 just because they looked suspicious and held for very long amounts of time (the law saying that they couldn't hold you for more than 48 hours or whatever amount of time was lifted.) They were given no right to an attorney, no lawyers, no phone call, no trial. If I were arrested I could have been sent to jail for 3 weeks, not been told what I did, then released and not able to fight back. Terrorists didn't take away our rights or liberties, the government did.

      I'll use my liberties in this democracy to strongly defend not only those people who would take away my liberties, but also to keep a government that will protect my liberties using every possible measure available.

      You will use your liberties to defend people who would take away the liberties and also a government that will protect your liberties by every possible measure available (by taking them away)? Wow so basically you're giving up your liberties and the liberties of all other citizens just so terrorists can't take away your liberties? Umm wait who has the power to give and take liberties... THE GOVERNMENT. So let's defend the government the only being capable of taking away liberties to stop terrorists from taking away our liberties (which they can't do anyway... I hope this eventually sinks through, only the GOVERNMENT can take away liberties and they've been doing that for over a year now.)

    7. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      If I were arrested I could have been sent to jail for 3 weeks, not been told what I did, then released and not able to fight back. Terrorists didn't take away our rights or liberties, the government did.

      Would you rather spend 3 weeks in jail cooperating with federal investigators, or worry about being blown up in the next building that Al-Quida is going to blow up? It's no contest for me, I'm taking the 3 weeks.

      -Brent
    8. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

      Co-operating with federal investigators? Do you think they did that in jail? No it was more like

      Police: get in jail
      You: Why?
      Police: We said, GET IN JAIL!
      You: I said WHY!
      Police: Looks like we've got a trouble maker
      *police throw you into jail*
      You: Don't I get one phone call? Can't I speak to an attorney?
      Police: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHA did you hear that george, he wants a phone call!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
      3 weeks later
      Police: Well you can get out now
      You: What did I do? I'm going to sue the crap out of this police department!
      Police: HAHAHAHA SUE US!?!?! Good luck buddy but thanks to new laws we were legally allowed to detain you for nothing more than being suspicious.
      You: Well I'm going to get someone to believe me and we'll fight back.

      This is where people like you come in...
      You: Help! Help! I'm being repressed! Other People: Whatever, that's what you get for being a terrorist ok.
      You: A terrorist?!?! WHAT! I didn't do anything!!!
      Other People: Sure you didn't, look at you, you're from palestine, you had to do SOMETHING!

      Remind you of anything? Like the japanese during WW2 right after Pearl Harbor? Oh sure it's ok lock up all the Japanese, as long as they can't blow up any more of the armies bases we'll be fine, who cares if they'll be hated for the next few years and unable to get jobs after being arrested for absolutely no reason. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

    9. Re:Um.....That Sux by rweir · · Score: 2

      I'll be fine. I'm not a Catholic or a Protestant. I'm a Jedi!

      I am not the terrorist you seek.
      *waves hand*

  48. Oh silly me. by Ted_Green · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You live under a bridge and have a thing for billy goats.

    Bravo. Quite a good troll.

  49. Librarians should follow this lead by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps this can be employed by your local librarian as well:

    "Oh, that's a not a late fee, that's the 'records retrieval' charge... Gee, I'm sorry, that should have been billed to the FBI, let me take that off of your account. Now, do you still want me to fetch that Civil Engineering book on demolition explosives?"

  50. Billable wiretaps in New York by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Something like this happened in the US about a decade ago, in New York, and it's one of the reasons the FBI pushed CALEA through.

    The New York office of the FBI was wiretapping various Mafia types (with some success; they eventually broke the New York Mafia). The taps were done by New York Telephone, and were implemented by ordering a remote extension from the circuit to be tapped to an FBI office. This was a billable service, and it wasn't cheap; the total costs of all those circuits were a strain on the FBI budget.

    One month, the FBI didn't pay the bill for one of their "extensions". The billing software then started billing the other party on the line, the person being wiretapped. Big embarassment.

    This was part of the motivation behind CALEA. Not only did it hurt the investigation, but it embarassed the FBI. (The FBI is very thin-skinned. "Don't embarass the Bureau" started with Hoover and lives on.)

    All this is in one of the books about how the FBI took down the New York Mafia, but I don't have the cite.

    1. Re:Billable wiretaps in New York by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      I recommend the book "Goodfella Tapes" by George Anastasia. I just finished reading it (for a crime class), complete with a guest speaking from the author. It's basically the story about the Philadelphia/South Jersey Mob War that occured about 1993-1995, based largely around FBI wiretaps, bugs, and other black-bag material. It's claimed to be the largest FBI wiretapping operation ever, and it almost got nixed by the overseeing judge after the first 4 weeks because nothing was happening (until two days before the 4 weeks were up).

      My favorite part was a guy who's office they had bugged. He pretty much said "I'm gettin' so paranoid I even had a guy come sweep the place."

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Billable wiretaps in New York by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see the software:

      if (!PaymentReceived(WiretappingAgency)) {
      SendBill(Customer);
      }

  51. Oldie but goodie by PolyDwarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    From Germans to everyone:

    All your calls are belong to us.

    1. Re:Oldie but goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From Germans to everyone:

      All your calls are belong to us.



      And their response?


      Somebody set up us the bug!

    2. Re:Oldie but goodie by JivanMukti · · Score: 1

      No, more like...

      All our bills are belong to you.
    3. Re:Oldie but goodie by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      That coming from Echelon country is preposterous.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  52. ironic by zenst · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its funny how in Germany they seem to want to charge the customer were in the UK all the mobile teco's got pissed off with requests for duplicate bill's from the police (which have all call's made and when) that they started charging them.

  53. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    ...or "Buggy Bugging Backfires: British Bobbies Buggered"

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  54. Even better by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2

    "Buggy Bugging By British Bobbies Backfires"

  55. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, one more...

    If this happened in Amish country, it could read, "Buggy buggy bugging backfires in bucolic backwoods blunder".

    I promise not to post for the rest of the day.

  56. Easy! by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    He's psychic! Or psycho? Well, socially challenged or "troll".

    Seriously, a significant amount of 9/11 planning took place in Germany (Hamburg?) ... and in England ... in that hotbed of insurrection, Florida ... and my neighbor's garage (oops, shouldn't've said that). Remember how they used public internet terminals in libraries to communicate godknowswhat? Communication is so easy now that location barely matters.

  57. I wish had more mod points! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will someone please mod parent down below a threshold of 0.

  58. MOD PARENT DOWN PLEASE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you need a reason other than the crap ass post itself, read the replies to it and then read SexyKellyOsbourne's Bio and journal!

  59. excessive alliteration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about this as a title...

    Buggy Bugging Backfires on Bavarian Bureau!

  60. fuck off you dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure let the f-ing govt take away all our liberties, under the "I have nothing to hide" moniker. Well, you DO have something to hide, YOUR PRIVACY. They can sieze property w/o cause, tap your phone, spy on you, hell even get your library habits WITHOUT CAUSE. I'm sorry to say, but idiots like you who want security over freedom don't seem to understand that without freedom, who cares about security?

    Now that the dumbass republicans control both houses, i'm sure we'll lose more of our rights, multinational corporations will gain a bigger foothold in world domination, and you will be arrested for "looking" at a cop wrong.

    DONT SAY I DIDNT TELL YOU
    (see that small camera in your bathroom?)

    1. Re:fuck off you dumbass by Raven1 · · Score: 1

      Are you really that ignorant?

    2. Re:fuck off you dumbass by ethanms · · Score: 1

      Better question... is the person who mod'd his post "insightful" that ignorant.

  61. What's CALEA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, I see, it's short for Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, a bill that "was passed in 1994 in response to rapid advances in telecommunications technology, such as the implementation of digital technology and wireless services, that have threatened the ability of law enforcement officials to conduct authorized electronic surveillance."

    Loads more info straight from the Horse's mouth.

    Incidentally, these websites are extraordinarily helpful. Now that the government has effectively scared serious criminals away from using the phone, we're free to spend much more time spying on political "agitators" and minor drug dealers :)

  62. Five Times Fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say that 5 times fast:

    Buggy Bugging Backfires
    Buggy Bugging Backfires
    Buggy Fuggy Fackbires
    Fuggy Fugging FUCK!

  63. How would the German police respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the German police would say something like:

    "Das cellphones ist nicht usen fur trakken das badfolken. Das policen ist nicht snoopen das folken a la 3rd Reich. Relaxen und watchen das bills increasen. And Kwitchurbelliaken."

  64. More importantly... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Zey have vays ov making you pay forr it!

    RMN
    ~~~

  65. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone who isn't white.

  66. PGP for luggage by azizlumiere · · Score: 0

    -Please enter your 10 digits prime number combination to open your luggage.
    -1627600127.
    -Thank you.

    --
    -Linux is SO fast it does an infinite loop in 5 seconds.
    1. Re:PGP for luggage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Now please enter the illegal prime number to access the DVD's in your luggage.

  67. Those crazy germans! by ChuckMaster · · Score: 1

    This is the same country that outlawed red blood in video games. Well, if the those violent video games and nazi symbols aren't getting through, how is there crime to even wiretap? *couch* sorry, choked on my own sarcasm.

  68. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Is /. English? If not then it wouldn't be illegal, but thanks for the tip anyhow.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  69. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by cmeans · · Score: 2
    Actually, it could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires on Bosh Bulls" and it would have stayed on-topic ;)

  70. Uhmm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you mean Destroyee, don't you?

  71. A slight flaw in that argument by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    Even assuming the remaining 15% were all agents of the secret police, how could they keep up with everyone else? Each agent would have to tap, monitor and follow six people.

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:A slight flaw in that argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Even assuming the remaining 15% were all agents >of the secret police, how could they keep up >with everyone else? Each agent would have to >tap, monitor and follow six people.

      It was impossible for them to monitor everyone. This however, not a problem. The idea one *can* be monitored is a very forceful deterrent.

  72. Thank God the Berlin Wall Came Down by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And those awful communist Bad Guys are gone and the Good Guys won. Everything's all better now.

  73. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Everybody · · Score: 1

    Or even better:
    Buggy Bugging by British Bobbies Backfires ?

  74. It's a miracle! by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You post that every day. Does the man resurrect or something?

    RMN
    ~~~

  75. You forgot the obvious... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    Start the sentence with "Bugger!"

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Malcolm+MacArthur · · Score: 1
      Minimalist:

      Buggers Buggered Up

      :-)

    2. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

      You mean their ass was on the line and they cocked it up? :-p

      RMN
      ~~~

  76. But don't worry... by Puk · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US government/law enforcement/intelligence agencies would never use their powers to spy on people. Aren't you a PATRIOT?

    -Puk

  77. Re:Perhaps more importantly... by symbolic · · Score: 2


    If they were charged, will they get a refund?

  78. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by netsharc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, Bundespolizei means Federal Police, so it wouldn't make sense to put a state together with it.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  79. Re:Damn Krauts. by Trespass · · Score: 1

    I think it's someone who makes pottery.

  80. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

    Try saying that ten times fast!

  81. Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In the film Brazil, after your arrest you have to pay for your own interrogations, your stay in prison and so forth; they send you a bill afterwards for the Governmental services you 'used'; or if you don't survive the interogation, they present the bill to your next of kin.

    Sounds to me like the Germans just sent the bill a bit early; they should have sent it after the investigation was complete.

    1984 came late it seems...

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    1. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it'll be fair? Taxes can be lowered if prisoners will pay for their prison services?

    2. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      You left out a ;-) which makes me think you are worryingly serious.

      No, it will be unfair on the rest of us. They'll come out of prison with huge debts, and have to commit more crimes to avoid going back in for lack of payment. Insurance premiums would go up massively; and the thieves will get less money on the item once they have fenced it than the item is worth, so non criminals lose out all the more.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WetCat · · Score: 1

      What if they'll have mandatory bancruptcy
      ( amnesty on their debt WITHOUT putting into credit history)
      when they leave out their prison ?
      But while they are in prison their are billed for prison maintenance.

    4. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by rweir · · Score: 2
    5. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by NTDaley · · Score: 1

      They billed it to his charge account beforehand.
      What was presented to Mrs. Buttle afterwards was the refund check, because Information Retrieval were supposed to be working on Tuttle, not Buttle.

      --
      bits and peace
      Nicholas Daley
  82. first ON topic comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First ontopic comment I've read so far and some stupid moderator marks it off-topic...I guess they got distracted by the shiny objects and forgot that the thread was about misbilling...

    1. Re:first ON topic comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't insult cats by comparing them to /. moderators. BTW, wanna see me getting modded up? Here goes:

      Macs are really cool, especially if you dual-boot to Linux. Oh, and Steve Jobs is a hunk!

      (now it shouldn't take more than 5 minutes for this message to reach "+5, Insightful")

  83. Dangerous by locarecords.com · · Score: 1
    I think that the fact they got caught shows that they are still naive when it comes to using the technology. But as they work out ways and means to control the technology we will less hear about it, and more scarily experience it unknown to us....

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
  84. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

    Or: Blatant Buggy Bugging Botched, Backfires: British Bobbies Buggered, Baffled. Boffins Blamed.

  85. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by beebware · · Score: 1

    No, Slashdot isn't, but the British Broadcasting Corporation (aka The BBC) who's coverage of this story Slashdot has linked to is.

  86. Alliteration Competition Entry by Shackleford · · Score: 1
    How's this for a headline:

    "Big Brother's Biggest Blunder: Bad buggy bugs beget big bill-related bungle. Backlash begins."

  87. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...you can even claim that it's rediculeus...

    Wow... I didn't realize that "rediculeus" one of those strange words that's spelled differently here in the US. I'm going to have to start slinging it around... "Take a look at the rediculeus colour they painted that alarum box!"

  88. Isn't that, like, alot of tapped lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telecommunications authorities said that nearly 20,000 lines were currently being tapped."

    Is it just me, or is anyone else thinking: "Holy Cow! 20 *thousand* people with their phones being tapped?"

    A few hundred, sure. That's probably the day-to-day level for their current crime investigations. But 20,000 in a country with a population of 82.5 million is a lot, IMO. The equivalent number for the US would be 67,100 persons with their phonelines being tapped. That's a city the size of Yakima, Washington that is under investigation of committing crimes.

  89. Schadenfreude? by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    Nur wenn man seine Nachbarn hasst.
    Und wer nicht?

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  90. Schadenfreud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Schadenfreud, or shameful joy. When you are laughing at the misfortune of others.

  91. They WERE charged for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yes, indeed -- they were even charged for it.

  92. Re:Um.....That Sux - Sure Does by RgnadKzin · · Score: 1

    Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

    Am I to presume that you can decide precisely whose rights are to be ignored, just by looking at them? In order for you to discern who should be tapped and who should not be tapped, you must first understand that probable cause is required in order to obtain a warrant.

    So does that make the choice:
    - tap us all or
    - tap us at random or
    - tap us because we're different,
    instead of
    - tap us upon the basis of a sworn affidavit showing probable cause?

    When you can tell the difference between friend and foe on sight, let us all know. It will make this war far easier.

    But that should not deter us from violating a "few" people's rights under the rule of necessity to impose peace and order under law martial rule, should it?

    Until it is your rights that have been violated.

    Or do you presume to sacrifice your essential liberty in exchange for some unattainable temporary safety?

    In that case, you deserve neither liberty nor safety, and that is what you will get.

    Feel free to mod me way, way down.

    --
    Liberty is not a concept... Liberty is a way of life!!!
  93. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by flossie · · Score: 2
    Is /. English?

    That depends on the legality of the revolution. After the fiasco in Florida a couple of years ago, the Queen is reported to be seriously considering revoking the declaration of independence.

    =o)

  94. Bundesgrenzschutz Abt. 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A VIRUS IS A DISEASE
    TERRORISM IS A TRANSGRESSION
    PIRACY IS A CRIME

    THIS IS THE CURE

    BGS9 BUNDESGRENZSCHUTZ ABT. 9

  95. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
    It is illegal for the UK media to report on incidents that involve national security.

    Such as just last month, when they gagged the press from reporting allegations that the UK govenment contracted Al Qaeda to assassinate Gaddafi.

    Not only did they gag reporting the story, they also demanded that the media can't even report (or protest) the fact that they have been gagged!

    Welcome to the free world. Leave your brains and integrity at the door please...

  96. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bosch

    Dur

  97. I'm an american german - I wanna laugh too. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    And Kwitchurbelliaken.

    I understood the joke in every fake german word, but what you mean with "And Kwitchurbelliaken." I really couldn't figure out.
    Could you get closer to real german spelling or give a translation of what's that suposed to mean?
    Thanks. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I'm an american german - I wanna laugh too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit your bellyaching.
      Quit yer bitchin.
      Stop Whining
      etc.

      BTW: Is Scheiskopf (sic) a used slur in German? Closest english equivalent is Sh*tHead

    2. Re:I'm an american german - I wanna laugh too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -he meant " quit your belly-achin' ", meaning " stop whining ".

  98. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Well, Bundespolizei means Federal Police, so it wouldn't make sense to put a state together with it.

    I don't speak German, I just got Bundes from Bundespost and Bundesliga. But how about "Buggy bugging backfires on battalion of burly blond Bundespolizei battling baddies based in Bavaria"?

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  99. Re:Winona Ryder Verdict In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just metamoded up the person who modded you down, cause I'm sick of fucking hearing this shit

  100. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cram it, tosser.