Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Circumvention, AOLandfill, Scoffing

Slashback tonight with more on efforts to stop the flow of AOL CDs from their house to yours, getting modded XBoxes on Microsoft's network, a less optimistic look at NVIDIA's latest chip, and more. Read on for more. Update: 11/22 00:13 GMT by T : Thanks to the AC who noticed the goofed headline ("this is only a test," remember), now amended.

Excuse me, is this the service entrance? We just posted about Microsoft blocking gamers with mod-chipped X-boxes from the Microsoft-run online gaming service; now NiteStar writes "Xbox-Scene.com just reported that a group of Xbox hackers named Team Assembly managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."

Not so fast, mister. The Raindog writes "Since NVIDIA announced its GeForce FX graphics chip, the web has been flooded with a slew of previews and articles that do little more than regurgitate what must have been NVIDIA's official press kit. Slashdot had coverage a few days ago, but since then, a new take on NVIDIA's latest chip has surfaced without all the PR-inspired hype. As it turns out, the GeForce FX's features aren't all that remarkable next to ATI's Radeon 9700 Pro, which has been available for months now."

I liked the old .sig about a black hole that would blot out the sun. Matthew Davis writes "CNN.com ran a story about Jim McKenna and John Lieberman back in October requesting everyone to send the CD mailers they receive to them. When they reach 1 million CDs they'll hand deliver them to AOL. In a recent article by SiliconValley.com they quote Nicholas Graham, a spokesman for AOL stating, "If they reach their goal ... I'd be happy to give them directions and greet them at the door ... We would make a contribution ourselves to put them over the top" Does that mean they're putting Jim and John's address on the top of the CD mailing list?"

Now if only these were CD-RWs ... and they can keep sending me the nice, reusable cases, just no more paper sleeves, thanks.

Still teasing, Stephen. foolish_child writes "Not sure if you noticed, but in the newest paperback pressing of Cryptonomicon (1 November 2002, I think) there is a chapter from Quicksilver at the back. I spotted it in the railway station in Amsterdam, so maybe it's a European edition. I have been checking to see if it was also online but have seen no sign of it - hence the heads up. I'm sure someone will scan it in soon - it is SUPERB! (read it waiting for a train) - Enoch the Red, emissary of the Royal Society, landing in 1700's Boston looking for . . someone. Scary thing is how good his research is as usual - I've just been reading up on Leibnitz and Newton and Co. and . . . you've probably seen it already but I wanted to share :)"

This new edition of Cryptonomicon is probably in a bookstore near you already, and the book proper is (only) several months away.

One small step for BanKind. An anonymous reader writes "It seems CapitalOne's website works with Mozilla, as of this November, 2002. This is good news because many people have CapitalOne credit cards, and previously the site required Microsoft's Intarweb Explorer. This just shows how simply speaking up by e-mailing large companies can evoke change. For more info see here ." Update: 12/03 22:00 GMT by T : Note that this information renders moot the question posed here about Cap One.

390 comments

  1. SLASHBACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    shouldn't that be slashBACK?

    from the stupid-nitpics department

    1. Re:SLASHBACK by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Funny

      no, it should be BACKslash

      --
      - tristan
    2. Re:SLASHBACK by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2

      Actually I was quite relieved to be told where I was in the headline. 17 hours of debugging assembly tends to disorient the mind...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    3. Re:SLASHBACK by hvatum · · Score: 0

      As for Nvidia; I'm suprised every time they release a good video card. I've been waiting for them to stop advancing their card technology and pull a 3dfx ever since they released the geforce2!

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    4. Re:SLASHBACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a BBS in Holland that Oldman ran...
      -Buckwheat

    5. Re:SLASHBACK by datsclark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What did it say?

  2. i was wondering how long that would take.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

    i mean, the reason they caught you is you installed a system mod.... you should be able to install ANOTHER system mod to stop them from catching you. seems obvious.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  3. Slashdot: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashback?

  4. No kidding! by Inoshiro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."

    It's not really surprising that changing the only 2 identity-linked features on a piece of hardware would let you get past their blacklist.

    What you should be asking yourself is: is it moral for you to go online, with your modchip, and screw over people who want to play online without dealing with cheaters? Is it? I don't think so.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read a little closer there buddy, it said, "with mod chip disabled", no cheating with mod chips, just able to get back onto XLive after being banned

    2. Re:No kidding! by Zeebs · · Score: 5, Insightful
      From the slashdor summary:
      managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."[bold my own]

      If the mod-chip is disabled how could they cheat? So is it moral? I think so.
      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    3. Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cheating against others is never moral, but I have a feeling that Microsoft isn't doing this so much to protect their users as they are to try to stick it to those who dared mess with their product. They put a lot of effort into making the XBox fairly hard to hack, and now that it's been done, I don't find it suprising that they're banning them.

      Is it immoral to play online with an XBox that you've modded so that you can run homebrew software, or install Linux? I would hope not. Modding does not necessarily equal cheating.

    4. Re:No kidding! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a little more worried about them picking MACs/Serials that other people already have and wreaking all sorts of havoc when the legitimate owners of the Serial/MAC tries to get online when the hacker has alreayd logged in.

      --
      Why not fork?
    5. Re:No kidding! by Indras · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you're missing a part of your quote, the one that says: (with mod-chip disabled)

      So, they can't exactly be cheating and screwing people over, if the only way they can get on xbox live is with the modchip DISABLED.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    6. Re:No kidding! by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Did you skip over the "with mod-chip disabled?" You still can't use a modchip while playing online. This just lets you play even if you forget to disable your modhip before going online before.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    7. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled)

      is it moral for you to go online, with your modchip

      You are too stupid to live. Seriously. Kill yourself now.

    8. Re:No kidding! by EllF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ino,

      Are all modchips necessarily used for cheating? From what I understand, the most spiffy thing about modding an XBox is that you can run Linux on such a system. If that's you reason for having such a system, how are you screwing over your fellow players?

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    9. Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heck, if you really wanted to screw MS over, it is probably possible to write a little piece of software that will run on the box, set the MAC and serial to initial values, connect, and then be banned. Increment serial and MAC and repeat. Leave running for a day or two.

      Pretty soon, EVERYONE would be banned. There's an ugly situation.

    10. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol... whatever. if it's bad for microsoft, then it must be good for me.
      but I dont think changing your serial number will make it any easier for you to cheat... this has nothing to do with circumventing m$' s modchip detection(they logged back onto xbox live with the chip turned off)
      Taking the moral high ground wont really dissuade cheaters though. for me, 'ethics' doesn't really enter the realm of online gaming.
      (cheating might make me an asshole, but I sure wouldn't lose sleep over it.)

    11. Re:No kidding! by batobin · · Score: 2

      At this point wouldn't Microsoft ban your login/password? Or perhaps might they notify your ISP of what you're doing?

      They're not going to sit idle while their entire database is massacred.

    12. Re:No kidding! by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is terrifying. I hope no one actually tries that.

      --
      Why not fork?
    13. Re:No kidding! by gvonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Modding does not necessarily equal cheating.

      Yes, but not modding necessarily implies not cheating, by all of the methods we know of.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    14. Re:No kidding! by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "the legitimate owners of the Serial/MAC"

      So, who are these legitimate owners? The whole point of the controversy seems to be
      the fact that Microsoft considers themselves to be the owners of those properties.
      I wonder how this compares to federal and state laws that govern who owns what, when a
      product is sold?

      I wonder if this protest will raise any question in consumers' minds
      as to wheter Microsoft even should be using your machine's serial number or ethernet address
      to identify and monitor a user at all.

      So many people posted, focusing on that detail, but few really
      seem to have properly identified the owner of the problem. It's
      not the modchipper, and it's not the so-called "legitimate" user.

      The problem rests on Microsoft's lap, and in no small way because they
      have relied on an insecure identifier to serve as a key
      to secure a system.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    15. Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      Very good point. Still, is it the most effective solution to ban people just because they have the ability to cheat? Whatever happened to banning actual cheaters?

      All they're going to do with this is alienate their geekier audience.

    16. Re:No kidding! by Ravenscall · · Score: 2

      Well, a few years ago they did sit by idlely as the hotmail domain expired and somebody else bought it, soo, in short....

      YES.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    17. Re:No kidding! by m1a1 · · Score: 1

      This isn't so much a problem. They still cannot get online with the mod chip plugged in. However, this allows for a chance to escape blacklisting if someone were to have accidentally logged in before disabling the chip. Still, an active chip will get you kicked.

    18. Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Offtopic, but I find it somewhat disturbing that my original comment has been modded "Informative". Like I gave someone an idea or something.

      I would have much preferred "Insightful" :P

    19. Re:No kidding! by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Cheating has made some games - like Counterstrike - annoying and unfun to play.

      The only real way to cheat on an X-box is to modchip it.

      Thus, to prevent what happened to games like Counterstrike, MS merely has to ban all modchipped X-boxes.

      Sure, it messes up the couple dozen people who bought an X-box to run Linux, but if you really want that, just buy a $200 PC from Walmart. I'd rather them ban modchips than have good games turn bad because of cheaters.

    20. Re:No kidding! by weeeee · · Score: 0

      Mod-chips allow unsigned programs capable of loading altered games with hacks. Hasn't been done yet, but possible.

    21. Re:No kidding! by weeeee · · Score: 1

      Oops, mod down parent. Didn't read it correctly.

    22. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably need to give him instructions...

    23. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was passport.com and someone else didn't buy it. He renewed it for them

    24. Re:No kidding! by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 2

      Or, hey, buy one xbox for linux, and one for screwing with!

      The likelyhood of their [Team Assembly] picking a MAC/Serial combo already in use is *extremely* remote, giving that there are 16777216 unique MAC adresses for *each* network adapter manufacturer. And only God (and Bill) knows how big the serial number space is!

    25. Re:No kidding! by DMBoyd · · Score: 1

      im already on it!
      only 16^6 dial ups to go

    26. Re:No kidding! by Rew190 · · Score: 3, Redundant

      Why do you need to be running Linux when you're going on XBox Live? The whole idea here is that when using Live you shouldn't be able to use ANY modchip. When you're not using Live, then hell, mod it to death. When you are, you can't use any modchips that could potentially let you cheat. I see no problem here.

    27. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ethernet vendor for the chip in the xbox probably does not have that many MAC addresses assigned, so you could limit your brute force attack to just those.

      Heck, you could sniff out enough of the protocol it uses to ban mod'd xboxs, and run that in a distributed attack spread by a microsoft worm. Talk about eating your own dogfood.

    28. Re:No kidding! by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      So slashdot is now a hacker site eh?

      Not only condoning but actually formulating ways of destroying a network.

      I knew it was only a matter of time before you guys crossed the line. This is it.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    29. Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      I'm not making a call to arms for someone to do this. I'm pointing out a potential hole in their model.

      You must be one of those "security through obscurity" people. Discussing the presence of a hole and actually exploiting it for more black-hatted purposes are two totally different and separate things. If I'm a terrorist for acknowledging the presence of a hole, then so be it. However, I think it more likely that you've just got your head up your butt.

      It's Microsoft's fault this hole exists, not mine. If they didn't want people talking about it, they should have coded against it. I have no desire for the Live network to be destroyed, but I do see a way that it could be done. That is -very- sloppy of Microsoft.

      I suppose that you're evil if you publish an abstract theoretical exploit of any buggy network or piece of software, too. Damn hackers - they're all alike, always trying to destroy other people's hard work. We should just lock them all up, right?

      Please.

    30. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and because one person mentions a hacking idea, doesnt mean that "the Slashdot community" is suddenly a group of cablemodem uncappers

    31. Re:No kidding! by spectecjr · · Score: 2
      From the slashdor summary:

      managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."[bold my own]


      This is just a general post, Zeebs -- sorry, but this was a good place to put it.

      Wow. That's so difficult, especially as the MAC address is configurable in the XBOX LIVE! UI.

      Simon
      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    32. Re:No kidding! by Babbster · · Score: 2
      It's by no means scientific, but a website which I'm sure a great many people in the "geekier audience" visit from time to time had a poll on this very subject yesterday.

      On that poll, about 30% of respondents indicated that they felt the banning was "a bit too harsh" or "unfair and wrong." About 70% didn't care or agreed in some way with the banning.

      Again, not scientific but I think it's interesting.

    33. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just plain funny.

    34. Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that MS has a database of all SN and MAC addresses, and that each SN can only be valid given one MAC address, well doing such thing (make a bruteforce program that fakes a modded-xbox logon, in order to ban everyone) could take a long while to do. Of course I assume that the NICs have a range of MAC addresses, but still, you must not only multiply the total of all possile permutations for the serial number, but also multiple that by the range of MAC addresses used by xboxs. This could make a very big number, and hence, take a very long while to bruteforce it.

      -Marton

    35. Re:No kidding! by flatt · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was passport.com, but no harm done. It did screw up hotmail though.

    36. Re:No kidding! by xenode · · Score: 1

      The real geeks do not need gamefaqs! They hunt down every secret and detail themselves. Or something, so I was told..

    37. Re:No kidding! by Babbster · · Score: 1

      You mean that real geeks don't need jobs?? Damn, I knew I was doing something wrong!

    38. Re:No kidding! by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

      Mod chips allow people to alter the contents of the XBox Live harddrive. This means that they could load the hack onto the harddrive, turn off the modchip & reset, log onto XBox Live and cheat. Granted, they'd have to hack the XBox desktop or whatever it's called so that the cheat was memory resident before they loaded the game, which would be difficult, but certainly not impossible.

    39. Re:No kidding! by bogado · · Score: 2

      One could cheat adding a snifer on line and getting more info then they suposed to have. Not having touched theys boxes.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    40. Re:No kidding! by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Here's something to ponder. What are the laws about changing the VIN on your car? Sure you bought the car and technically it is yours but I think if you went and modified it the DMV may have some issues with it if not your insurance company.

    41. Re:No kidding! by sedawkgrep · · Score: 2

      No.

      Without a modified BIOS being active, you cannot run unsigned or code with an invalid cryptographic sign. All binaries are signed; modifying them would would invalidate that.

      "Load the hack onto the harddrive"...do you even have the most remote idea of what you're saying? There is no mechanism in the Xbox to load TSRs or other memory-resident tools...and like I said before - having no (or an inactive) modchip prevents you from running this type of code.

      Hell - even the saved games are signed.

      You should really research things before you just assume something like this.

      --
      Is that a salami in my pants or am I just happy to be me?
    42. Re:No kidding! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      That's right: Real geeks write such wonderful code that, even though it's GPL'd (perhaps because it's GPL'd), people throw buckets of money at them. Really! Just ask Stallman.

      Oh, wait, those aren't buckets of money they're throwing at him -- those are buckets of...

      EWEWWUU! That's GROSS!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    43. Re:No kidding! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      The claim is that they changed both their serial number and MAC address and were allowed into XBox Live. This implies they changed them at random -- there's no indication that they even used a MAC address within the chip manufacturer's range, let alone that they used a MAC address and serial number off another XBox. The implication is that Microsoft is not checking a master list of known good Serial Number/MAC Address combos -- heck, the implication is that they're not even checking that the Serial Number or MAC Address are "valid", they're just checking that one or the other (probably just the serial number*) is not on the "Banned" list.

      * XBox Live is supposed to work from behind a firewall/NAT router, so they're not getting the XBox's MAC address, they're getting the router's MAC address. I doubt they check the MAC address, and I'll bet spoofing the Serial Number alone is enough to use a previously banned XBox on XBox Live.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    44. Re:No kidding! by karlm · · Score: 2
      Confusing cracker/hacker : -1

      Assuming formulaing implies condoning : -1

      Moderation totals: -2

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    45. Re:No kidding! by karlm · · Score: 2

      IP doesn't preserve lower level addresses. Unless a machine on the LAN is cooperating, I don't know of any way to get IP addresses across the globe.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    46. Re:No kidding! by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

      Thanks. You make a good point about the signed/unsigned code.

      I'm not quite conviced that there would be no mechanism for loading a memory-resident piece of code, or perhaps a way of patching the code as it is loaded into memory for instance. After all, if you've managed to replace the dashboard with one of your own creation I'd have thought that you could then get control of the loading process (or is that handled entirely by the bios as well?). Anyway - as you rightly point out - it doesn't make much difference if you can't run unsigned code.

      cheers,

      Tim

  5. Like poking a savage dog with a stick by plierhead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look out for MS's righteous rage when the forged MAC addresses start colliding with existing, non-hacker users and it disrupts the Live service they've paid for! Can anyone say "bolt the door, the wolf's outside" ?

    --

    [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    1. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by meringuoid · · Score: 2
      Look out for MS's righteous rage when the forged MAC addresses start colliding with existing, non-hacker users and it disrupts the Live service they've paid for! Can anyone say "bolt the door, the wolf's outside" ?

      If I was being responsible, I'd set my Xbox MAC address to be exactly the same as the one on my PC... I assume no other Xbox is likely to have that MAC.

      But then again the range of MAC addresses is so vast, why bother with that? The chances of collision have got to be vanishingly small, right?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by rodgerd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Part of the address space is manufacturer specific; if you wanted to create collisions intentionally, it would be fairly trivial to narrow the range down to whoever makes X-Box ethernet chips.

    3. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "Look out for MS's righteous rage when the forged MAC addresses start colliding with existing, non-hacker users and it disrupts the Live service they've paid for!"

      Has anybody anywhere seen two devices on the same network with the same MAC address? That wasn't done intentionally? I mean, we ain't exactly talking about a 4-digit PIN number here...

    4. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's MAC address range is probably owned by them, not by an OEM they used. MAC addresses, while hardware-bound, are not the sort of thing embedded by a chip vendor, they're more likely to be plugged in by someone further up the line (i.e. the board manufacturer.) And the blocks aren't even necessarily owned by a manufacturer. A few years ago somebody on Usenet who had gotten a big block of MAC addresses for some project he was doing handed out some of the extras. I voluneteered to take a block, so I 'own' a block of 256 MAC addresses that are uniquely mine. It's sort of handy, as I buy and mess around with old Sparc hardware. Often it arrives with a dead NVRAM which means I have to assign it a MAC address of some sort.

    5. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange but true... we got shipped two Intel 1000/copper NICs, threw them into two servers, got VERY bad performance. Turns out the switch was getting really confused seeing the same MAC in two different places... manually set one to a different number and it works fine.

    6. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by amorsen · · Score: 2

      It is not that unusual to see two netcards with the same MAC -- most often 00:00:00:00:00:00. Usually the problem is either that the EEPROM was not properly initialized from the factory, or that some driver figured it should override what the EEPROM says. It is a really annoying problem to diagnose if you don't get the right idea quickly, because most things still work most of the time. IP is very resilient, and some misdirected packets won't completely break anything.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    7. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by SporkLand · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, as I'm not on the same sub-net with MS I doubt that my MAC address will make a huge difference. The MAC address shouldn't show up anywhere past my nearest gateway.

    8. Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Any system involving "bans" will inevitably lead to "false" bans. This was all played before with Blizzard and Blizzard.net over Diablo. You needed a login and CD-Key to get onto Blizzard.net, but the warez kids made up CD-Key generators. Keep trying until you got one that worked, nevermind that there is probably a legitimate owner that already has that key.

      The same thing is going on with X-Box Live!. "Mod-chipped" XBoxes are being banned, but the various mods for XBoxes don't work in a consistant way, so the "net" has to be cast pretty far, resulting in "false" bans and lots of complaints to customer service. In practice, they HAVE to let anyone who complains access XBox Live! (there is legal and RP fallout for doing so). So in practice, all you have to do is mod your X-Box and then call customer service and complain that you were banned unfairly.

      This is ignoring the fact that modchip groups have ALREADY figured out how the detection on XBox Live! works and modchips will arrive in the next 2-3 months that are compatible with XBox Live!.

  6. Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You get a EULA that says that you can't access the online gaming forum with a modified X-Box. Then you go and circumvent that by putting a new serial number and MAC address on it, possibly depriving someone else down the line with the identical numbers of playing online.

    You broke the licensing agreement in the first place by modding the box. Why do you think it's right to break it further by circumventing the agreed-upon penalty?

    1. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by kindbud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you think it's right for a seller of a physical product to tell you what you may or may not do with that product after the lawful sale?

      Do we, as consumers, have property rights, or don't we?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You broke the licensing agreement in the first place by modding the box. Why do you think it's right to break it further by circumventing the agreed-upon penalty?

      Duh, when they bought the xbox they sent microsoft a "end-seller license" that said they had permission to hack the xbox, or Microsoft could visit their home and take it back for a refund. They never showed up, thus agreeing to the license. Freedom of contract, right?

    3. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. You can play by the rules though, if you want.
      (I hate it when ordinary peasants start talking like m$ reps... do you really give a shit about their bottom line?)

    4. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can mod your XBox to the gills, but you can't expect to connect to a service with the system. It's like asking Fujitsu to replace your hard drive when you've already broken the "Do Not Remove" sticker.

      You can do whatever the hell you want with your personal hardware, but you just can't use the servers with a tampered-with box.

      No one here has violated your property rights. Rather, you (meaning the modders, of course) are attempting to violate a contract and then proceeding to continue with the violation by circumventing (in violation of the contract again) the penalty for the initial violation.

    5. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that it's legal to license hardware. It's not even covered under copyright. Where do I agree to anything when I open up an Xbox console? If I buy an XBOX, I am fully within my rights to bend or break it in any way I please because it is my property. If I pay for a service I ought to be able to recieve that service without monopolistic entities restricting my access. See US vs Ma Bell.

    6. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you turn off your mod-chip, your X-box becomes a regular X-box and should be accepted on the network.

      What's braindead is Microsoft banning a serial number *forever*. That's unnecessary and that's what will possibly deprive someone else down the line with the identical numbers.

    7. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the XBox box was opened and the system was used (which seems pretty obvious), then the EULA was agreed to. There is no evidence that Microsoft received such a letter from the modders, and no way to certify that they agreed to it in any way.

      An XBox system at the modder's home is evidence of agreement. Nothing of the sort exists in the opposite direction.

    8. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Mononoke · · Score: 3, Informative
      Why do you think it's right for a seller of a physical product to tell you what you may or may not do with that product after the lawful sale?
      They aren't telling you what you can or can't do with the product. They are telling you that you can or cannot take advantage of their service (the servers.)

      Modded xboxes aren't welcome on their servers for the same reason modded games (cheats) aren't welcome on other game servers.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    9. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Jagen · · Score: 1

      Do you want to know what that EULA means to me? Absolutely fuck all. Its not a legal document, ie I have yet to hear of a EULA ever being legally enforced.
      And even if I "break the licensing agreement", so what, its my damn hardware, i'll do what the hell I like to it and there nothing MS can do about it.

    10. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by svvampy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But they're not playing with mod chips enabled, so they own the game and they're paying for the service. Maybe if they were aware of the consequences of attempting to play with a modded box then they wouldn't have tried to do so in the first place. A permanent ban is very harsh considering that they've bought the Xbox, the game(s) and subscribed to the service. Maybe if M$ offered a refund for cancelling their access it would be an issue, but I think they are justified in changing the serial number and MAC address to plat for what they've paid for.

    11. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by ni5mo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why is the Vatican equipped with lightning rods?

      Because God isn't a catholic :)
    12. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's to say that the XBox is "regular" after it has been modded? If the system has been compromised in some way, then it is not the identical system that was sold.

      All that the XBox online system knows about a system are the bits that are sent to it. If someone found a way to compromise a box with destructive code, it could mean some nasty effects for all users of the online system. Even the security system in place now (banning of serial numbers) is ineffective because a compromised box can still switch SNs and propagate malicious code to the servers (in theory).

      So yes, banning serial numbers is not the best way to get rid of security vulnerabilities, but the XBox systems are in place now and they can't be changed so easily. It's really the best MS can do about a bad situation.

    13. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by unicron · · Score: 2

      Then don't connect to their servers. End of discussion.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    14. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your attitude is saddening. This isn't about someone taking your rights away, it's about you taking someone else's rights away.

      That you feel you are in some way entitled to usurp others' rights is perhaps a sign of the times.

    15. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would it bother you if I cloned your cell phone and made a few international phone calls?

      Maybe you wouldn't mind if I encoded your credit card information on one of mine?

      Same concept...a machine that makes itself uniquely identifiable. Changing the identifiable information is not necessarily illegal, but when you use that information to impersonate someone else, it becomes fraud.

    16. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      so what, its my damn hardware, i'll do what the hell I like to it and there nothing MS can do about it.

      The X-box Live! servers are their own damn hardware, and they'll do what the hell they like to them and there's nothing you can do about it.

      Mod all you like, but don't expect to be able to use their servers.

    17. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it up, he's a typical slashdotter. No way you or I can do anything to someone that's managed to convince themselves that what's good is what's fun, and what's bad is what's boring.

    18. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Bagheera · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And many EULA's have been found unenforcable. Remember, this is hardware not software. My WRX didn't come with an EULA from Subaru saying I could only run Amoco Premium in the tank and couldn't change the air cleaner for a K&N, why shoud an X-Box come with an EULA that restricts what I do with MY hardware.

      You BUY hardware, you don't license it.

      Now, I agree with you completely that snagging another MAC and S/N at random is very uncool for the poor sot who actually buys the iron with those numbers.

      As for why it's OK to break the licensing agreement, I point out (again) that hardware is NOT licensed, it's owned. I do not RENT my console. I own it.

      As for circumventing the ban, given the above (I own my iron) I figure it's within my rights as a user to USE the iron I bought and paid for.

      I'm NOT condoning cheating or anything with a mod. This isn't about cheating. It's about the owner's rights to use their own gear.

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    19. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Using MAC addresses to uniquely identify global players is insane. No network programmer would do such a thing.

      I'm breaking a poorly programmed idea. If I break another players' game by plugging in my 3rd party joystick then it's a fault of the system, not of me.

    20. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
      Modded xboxes aren't welcome on their servers for the same reason modded games (cheats) aren't welcome on other game servers.
      Prove that this has anything to do with cheating.
    21. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      When I bought an Xbox it was promised that online gaming was coming, and that was part of the reason for my purchase.

      I'm all for stopping cheating. This has nothing to do with that.

    22. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by skookum · · Score: 1

      Do whatever you want with your XBox in the privacy of your own home. However, when you connect to Microsoft's servers you agree to their policies. If you don't like this, don't use XBox Live.

    23. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      What rights? What negociation? What document? Was it made clear to me that my legal use of my Xbox would prevent me from using the advertised Xbox coming-feature of online games?

    24. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a macroscopic technical problem. Get enough people to do this and not even M$ can afford enough lawers to sue them.

    25. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Breaking the "Do Not Remove" sticker does not void your warranty, contrary to popular belief. Your legally imbued warranty covers all manufacturers defects regardless of what you have done to/with the product.

      And, as to the contract issue... The easiest way around that is to just not agree to the EULA. I have no service agreement with my cable company, they never asked me to sign one. I give them money, they give me cable. I have no agreement with Sony Online Entertainment (for playing Everquest online) because even though they "asked" me to "sign" one I didnt. I give them money, they let me access my account.

    26. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such an idiot. You obviously didn't read the thread two days ago, or if you did it just fell out of your mind like the seive it is.

      Do anything you like with the Xbox.

      Do not expect to play on the Live network if you fuck with it.

      You now have the right to cease your karma whore slashbot bleating and work on some basic comprehension exercises. Right now you're just too stupid to be playing Xbox online, and that's saying something.

    27. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove it doesn't. But even if you do Microsoft don't have to give a shit what you prove. Better exercise your puny consumer power and not buy their product!

    28. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by perky · · Score: 2

      Why do you think it's right for a seller of a physical product to tell you what you may or may not do with that product after the lawful sale?


      They're not. They are stating the rules that govern whether they will sell you a service that they are providing. Much like a casino making the rules for players.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    29. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have asked the terms of the coming online gaming before handing over your money, or waited until they were available for you to consider. Now you're fucked. Better put your Xbox on eBay. Either that or don't play Live. Or accept it. They're your only choices, whining about it here will get you nothing.

    30. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      What's braindead is Microsoft banning a serial number *forever*. That's unnecessary and that's what will possibly deprive someone else down the line with the identical numbers.

      Especially in the event that an XBox is sold as used hardware and then is purchased by another end-user, only to find that they can't play online because one of its previous owners modded it at some point in the past.

      Why even do a lifetime ban? Why not just deny access to the network if a box is modded, and then allow access once the modchip is switched off?

      MS is pissed that their highly-protected hardware has been messed with. I'm not trying to be a MS-basher here, but that's the only logical conclusion I can come up with. They want to stick it to you if you've messed with their hardware. It's not an easily hackable system, and they designed it that way. I can imagine they're not happy about people finding a way around their roadblocks.

    31. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahahaha! It's so refreshing to see a naive youth. Just you try and exchange something after tearing off the warranty sticker. They might not notice, but if they do you have no chance, whatever you think the law says. The law will laugh at you unless you spend far, far more than the cost of your product to make it listen.

    32. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harsh? Who gives a shit. Microsoft own the service and owe you NOTHING. Can't wait until they start prosecuting mod chip kiddies for violating DMCA.

      (a Heinlein fan, and proud of it)

    33. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As has been said previously (but you have trouble understanding this):

      Chop up your Xbox with an axe if you like. Wrap it in latex and use it as a giant dildo. Boil until tender and garnish with capers and mustard. Even add a mod chip!

      But do any of these things and you can't play Live.

      It seems so easy to understand yet these cretins keep saying "my hardware! me do what me want!"...

      (Shame about your plastic rice rocket. Did you buy a huge fin and a Type R sticker? Yeah I know it's only for Hondas but your typical Rice Boy doesn't)

    34. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You didn't hear about the uncapped cable modem users being raided by the FBI? I don't know what you call "legally enforced" but that would seem to qualify. Good luck kid. What they will do about it is kick you off the Live network, and there's not a thing you can do about it. And stop pretending you know how to change your serial number and MAC, you don't.

    35. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. You are offered Live service only if you use an unmodified Xbox. No other hardware qualifies. You lose.

    36. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. And Microsoft CAN stick it to you, too. I just love seeing these pathetic idiots acting oh so clever because they can copy a real engineer's reverse engineering of the Xbox. Then Live comes along, there's this loud BANG, and they look down and see the hole in their foot...

    37. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Using someone else's legitimate serial number you obtuse twat. Don't pretend not to know, it is weak and pathetic.

      Nothing was made clear to you about Live until it was released, that's what released means. Now it is released and it wasn't the way you assumed it was. You are, to coin a phrase, fucked. Pretty FUCKING STUPID to assume anything about a service you knew nothing about.

    38. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by _Knots · · Score: 1

      Potentially speaking you could send your half of the contract in a tracked, return-reciepted method... and as to make sure that you actually sent a copy of what you still have... hmm... there must be a way. It'd need to be something you couldn't forge... like say a bank notarization?

      Just pondering. I might actually do this with the next piece of software I buy just to see what happens. And yes, I'd send it off before breaking the shrinkwrap.

      "Dear [company],
      I have purchaced [product] but would like you to agree to the following before I agree to your EULA: ...
      Failure to recieve a letter stating otherwise on company stationary within [some reasonable time - seven business days?] constitutes your agreement to the above terms.

      Sincerely,
      [name]"

      Alright, alright, it'd never work, but it'd be nice.

      --Knots;

      --
      Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
    39. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think it's kinda funny. They could completely lock out people's MAC addresses by changing the MAC, getting themselves banned, changing the MAC, getting themselves, banned, repeat, repeat, repeat. Then the banning would more or less become useless.

      Think they can monitor the credit card number? There's plenty of fake/stolen ones out there, and they can use those.

    40. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's poorly programmed. Never mind the fact that it works pretty fucking well, some AC on slashdot says it's poorly programmed! He's probably got at least half a computer science degree behind him, quick, pull the service!

    41. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by edwdig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But you're forgetting, Xbox Live is a service. You don't own it. You pay MS to use it. Their terms are you can only use it with unmodified hardware. There isn't anything wrong with that.

      As for the Xbox itself, Microsoft doesn't care what you do with it, nor do they have any say in the matter. They strongly prefer that you buy a lot of games for it, but hell even if you make it a Linux box, they don't care. Just lets them say to developers, "Hey, we've sold x systems, you should make games for us." (Yes, in the long run they don't want a lot of people buying systems but not games, but in the short run it probably still helps them)

    42. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, how many possible MAC addresses are there? How long would it take to use up a noticable chunk of even the small space allocated to MS?

      Dickhead!

    43. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      If you are using MS's hardware (the XBL pipes and servers) against MS's wishes and possibly at the expense of one of MS's paying customers, they have every right to try to keep you off. It's call the right to refuse service.

    44. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Interesting
      As for why it's OK to break the licensing agreement, I point out (again) that hardware is NOT licensed, it's owned. I do not RENT my console. I own it.

      I strongly support the "I bought it, I'll hack it as I wish" attitude. It's my right to play DVDs under Linux, add mod chips to my consoles, and disable macrovision and region coding from my DVD player.

      But.

      This isn't about your hardware. This is about a service you pay for (and agree to a license for up front). You're welcome to hack your X-Box, but Microsoft is free to decline to let you onto their service. Seems reasonable to me.

    45. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by cheezedawg · · Score: 2

      What makes you think these people have lost the right to modify their hardware? They can do whatever the hell they want to their hardware- that hasn't changed.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    46. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a pretty intelligent person to start off a comment with the word "Idiot". Do you get your intellect from your mom or your dog?

    47. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of civil disobedience?

    48. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because God wants to protect the Pope's
      Computers from direct hits.

    49. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
      IF you mod your Xbox it becomes possible to cheat.
      Come on now, I asked people to prove it. How is cheating any more possible with a modded Xbox? It's not like a toggle button comes up when you've got a modded box.
    50. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2
      No one has to prove that. MS can ban anyone, for anytime, for any reason. Period.
      Of course you're right here, but surely we're talking about whether it's right, not whether due to a carefully cast contract whether they can argue their case in the courts - right?

      I'm simply saying that out of your 3 scenarios only 1 is wrong (remember, backups are legal in most places, so we have 4 scenarios, 2 of which should be allowed).

      Microsoft has a moral right to prevent genuine pirated software, and they have the right to stop cheats. They don't have a moral right to stop Xbox Linux or backups, and furthermore Xbox Linux isn't illegal.

      Sooner or later you need to realise Microsoft's game. Because they group the illegal and the legal but undesirable uses together ("who would really want to do that anyway?") they aim to stop non authorised and yet valid choices. I'm quite angry at that. I'm not angry at the idea of hitting down on cheaters - but as each game is signed by the author it wouldn't be hard to detect game modifications. Do you really think this was the best they could do? Do you really think this has anything to do with cheating? Do you really think they couldn't have thought out a better and more accurate way to only detect game modifications?



      No, they're trying make it so that if you run Linux you can't access their gaming network. You either take it all Microsoft's way, or you have none at all.

      This has been their method all along. Here we have cheats and Linux users in the same boat - and how we hate cheaters!

    51. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by mr_exit · · Score: 2

      Microsoft will try to say this but after talking to a product lead at EA, it was clear they verify their own numbers for consoles sold. They then compare that to the number and value of games sold, THEN compare that to the gamess out on the market in different genres and base their decisions on all these things.

      Noone would throw millions developing a game without spending a fair ammount evaluating if that game will sell.

      Xbox owners that dont buy games (or signup to xboxLive) lower the average spend.... and this is just as important to the game makers as the number of consoles out there

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
    52. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2
      THAT IS THEIR RIGHT.
      Usually when people type in all caps they consider themselves passionately responding to someone who disagrees with them. However, I have said it's their legal right. America can nuke the world, I can kick my cat, and that's all beside the point of whether it's right.

      But if you do something they dont like, they can withold service.
      What you are proposing is unlike any law on the planet. Eulas are not always legally enforceable, and they are always superseded by the law of the land. Microsoft haven't

      I couldn't care less about cheaters. I couldn't care less about video games, or Xbox or anything like it.
      Your post disagrees with you.

      The fact is that there hasnt been a better way to enforce non-cheating. Any code can be modified with simple tools that enable cheating. The only way to prevent this is to use secure protocols, trusted hardware, and trusted software. That is what MS has done. Precisely. This method is very effective. Nothing else will be as effective. Period.
      Any connection can be monitored. Say, for example, the connection between Microsoft and the Xbox. The data-stream can be modified with simple tools that enable cheating.

      But yeah, you've certainly shown your true colours. You don't give a fuck if 2 out of those 4 uses are harmed. You think it's the price to pay for the harm done. You disgust me.

    53. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2
      Ho-hum.

      Actually, being able to play online was quite clear. Advertising is a contract. If I'm doing legal things with my Xbox and I can't use an advertised feature then that may be illega.

      I'm not saying I'm right. I'm saying it's not so clear.

    54. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2
      People who PAY for the service are harmed when they pay for the service and Modders+Cheaters disrupt the service.
      Again, you're quite happy to group modders and cheaters. The moral tones of each elude you.

      Unless they run the connection through industry standard stuff like SSL which is trivial to implement. Which blows your theory out of the water.
      There's no such thing as end-to-end encryption. SSL protects connections on the network, at a certain stage, and it does not offer the kind of security we're talking about here when we do not trust one party.
    55. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 2
      iIt occurs to me that this little hole could be used as the basis of a DoS attack on XBOX-Live.

      If enough people do it often enough, eventually enough Xboxes will be banned that MS will have to get rid of the blacklist.

      --
      Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
    56. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Doing something to break a piece of hardware, no matter how deliberate, does not void its warranty. If I buy a car with a faulty air conditioning system and then wreck it on purpose the air conditioning system is still covered under the warranty. Obviously the newly imparted damage to the car wouldnt be covered, but everything that was wrong with it when you got it would be.

      The implicit contract is just that, service for money. It is what we common folk like to call "selling stuff". All the extraneous clauses of the not-agreed-to service agreement have no bearing. With an explicit service agreement I pay you and you give me service AND I cant do foo or bar or blah (insert whatever it is the agreement says you cant do) AND I am bound by the laws of Oregon (whatever) in my dealings with you (common clause) AND I am not entitled to a refund if service is cancelled (another common clause). Without an agreement I pay you and you give me service, period, everything else is covered under consumer law and in no way affected by the agreement that I didnt agree to.

    57. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by saihung · · Score: 3, Funny

      >My WRX didn't come with an EULA from Subaru saying >I could only run Amoco Premium in the tank and >couldn't change the air cleaner for a K&N

      Dammit, if God intended your car to have free air flow, he would've put a a free-flow filtration system on your car to begin with!

    58. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2
      Trusted hardware, signed software, encrypted communications. Thats a pretty strong way to prevent tampering.
      Perhaps you didn't read the article. The pretty strong way to prevent tampering, to prevent cheats, to prevent the untrusted player... it was by beaten by changing the serial number and the mac address.

      Now, you must concentrate on this because this is the part so many people miss, the key item here is that this is how much Microsoft care about cheating.

      Microsoft have to earn that trusted network, and they blew it again. As you say, SSL could have done it, but they didn't bother.

      In Australia they said it should be illegal to sell modding chips for Xboxs. This is just one more way of PR to blur the lines between modders and cheaters.

      But please, the evidence is clear. They don't care about the cheating. They would have done a better job. They care about modding.

    59. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by BlameFate · · Score: 1
      You forgot the line reading:

      The act of opening the envelope in which this letter arrived stands as agreement to the terms outlined above.

      Reverse-shrinkwrap the buggers :-)

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    60. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by ozzy_cow · · Score: 1

      remember, subaru is in business of making hardware. in fact they encourage fine tuning, modding etc (thats why hondas are so popular among tweakers).
      on the other hand microsoft is here to make money on software (game licencing). as the matter of fact i microsoft is even losing money on the xbox hardware itself (so is sony on ps2) not sure about exact number (btw. xbox costs most to make - out of other gaming consoles)

      their main concern is that people who mod xboxes also pirate games. lets face it, thats what 80% of people get their xbox modded for. instead of alienating the eintre tweaker comunity they should just employ different anti-piracy techniques.

      take counter-strike/half-life for example: you buy a game and a cd-key. you can play cs w/ your buddies w/ a warez cd-key but thats no fun. when you want to go online and play everyone else you have to have a legit copy. cheating is not an issue either because it can be detected on the server (a bullet that just went through 4 walls) so thats not an issue either (bad game design on microsoft's side?)

      of course it can be a pain to enter your 15 digit cd-key using the controller...

    61. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you didn't read the article, did you? Sure, the cheaters were able to return, but only with the mod chips removed. XBox Live is still in the state MS intended, ie without cheaters.

      I find the hypocrisy here funny. "Free speech for me, but not those who agree with me." "Sure I have 50GB of ripped music that I downloaded and listen to regularly, but I would have never bought that music, so I am ethical." "Yeah, I modded my console and have coded some 733t and wonderful autoaimers, but modders aren't cheaters." Grow up. Nobody buys your silly affirmations anymore. P2P is for stealing software and music, and modding game consoles is for cheating at games. Plain and simple, case closed. Take your silly lies and peddle them elsewhere.

    62. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by 3Bees · · Score: 1
      Mod all you like, but don't expect to be able to use their servers.

      Unless you can change the MAC address and serial number of your modded box...this attempt to moralize the issue is very tired. They did it, MS will do something in response. That is the game that these guys love playing with their X-Boxes.

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
    63. Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2
      And SSL would be on a per game basis.
      Hang on, I thought cheating was made more difficult on the network? Now they're doing basic security on a per-game basis?

      I am correct again. MS effectively has stopped cheating, and you can't stand it. They have also stopped modd'd hardware running on thier network. Boo hoo for you.
      Where did I ever say I agreed with cheating? Oh, that's right, you're fighting against a cliche of your own invention. Good one.
  7. It's unanimous by ekrout · · Score: 5, Funny
    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:It's unanimous by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      When I saw AOLandfill in the title, I thought it might be a much cooler topic. A lot of used Sparc Ultra machines are showing up on eBay lately retired from use by AOL, and I thought maybe there was a good dumpster dive to go on.

    2. Re:It's unanimous by xenode · · Score: 1

      That second picture deeply frightens me... seriously.

  8. Don't say you werent warned by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you send your AOL CDs back to those guys, you get what you deserve...Them send right back to you.

    1. Re:Don't say you werent warned by Indras · · Score: 2

      Heh, maybe they should see if they can round up old AOL floppies from days of old. I highly doubt AOL is going to send those out to people :o).

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    2. Re:Don't say you werent warned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I think I do still have some AOL 3.5" disks, not reformatted. Now I'm going to go see if I can find them!

    3. Re:Don't say you werent warned by Migelikor1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They scratch them when they get the cds to prevent them from being sent out again.

      --
      My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    4. Re:Don't say you werent warned by jcpii · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really... you should keep all those CDs. Then tile the ceiling of your bedroom like a mirror, take a picture or two like this, and send them to the AOL execs. They can be comforted in know that they brought it on themselves... kinda.

  9. what about the innocent? by reduced · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i bet microsoft checks for dupes on the live network. some paying customer is probably locked out now.

    1. Re:what about the innocent? by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      Somehow, I hardly imagine that they're reached MAC address saturation by now. There are more that 4 possible MAC addresses for one to use :)

    2. Re:what about the innocent? by Sheetrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they can be a bit less draconian with their schemes? Nobody's forcing them to lock people out at all, right?

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    3. Re:what about the innocent? by jasonditz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Couldn't you just change the MAC address to be identical to some other device you already own then? I'll bet if I used the MAC addy off one of my Javastations it'd be unique...

    4. Re:what about the innocent? by Moonshadow · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but I'm fairly certain that MACs aren't expected to be unique. On my school's campus, you have to register your MAC with a central DB to get network access, and there has been more than one MAC address collision with just the few hundred machines I've set up.

      Anyone have more insight into this?

    5. Re:what about the innocent? by livitup · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm... no.

      MACs are supposed to be unique. With most network devices (not just Xboxen) you can force the device to use a specific address that you make up (possibly causing a problem if the MAC is already in use in your broadcast domain) but real use of this ability is pretty rare.

      In any event the first few bits or a MAC are assigned per manufacturer (many manufacturers have more than one) and then they are supposed to go through the rest of the bits assigning a unique set to each device they make.

      At least that's how it is supposed to be.

    6. Re:what about the innocent? by BJH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably wouldn't work. A MAC address is made up of two parts - a manufacturer code (unique to a certain company) and a part code (unique to that particular card, for that manufacturer code).

      I imagine Microsoft is smart enough to check that the Xbox trying to connect to their network is at least using a MAC address that belongs to a Microsoft NIC...

    7. Re:what about the innocent? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      which brings up the interesting follow up question, does Microsoft manufacture the NICs in the Xboxes or did someone else? I mean, if they outsourced it to linksys or something we've all got extra NICs of theirs lying around.

    8. Re:what about the innocent? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Nobody is forcing your to mod your Xbox, either.

      You mod, you don't get to use the on-line service.

      Last I checked, the service is run by MS and if they don't want modded boxes on it, I think they should be have that right.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    9. Re:what about the innocent? by shogun · · Score: 2

      and there has been more than one MAC address collision with just the few hundred machines I've set up.

      Did the mac address have DEADBEEF in it by any chance?

    10. Re:what about the innocent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, but you DO, you DO get to use the on-line service. I do think that was the point of this article.

    11. Re:what about the innocent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nvidia makes the NIC, but the mac is in the eeprom and is provided by microsoft.

    12. Re:what about the innocent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wha?

      A large manufacturer make many more NICs than there are MACs assigned to them (After taking out the manufacturer/product codes).

      The chances of getting two cards with the same MAC is pretty low, though it happens. If every card had a unique MAC address what would be the point of making them changable? The cost of the card could be reduced by removing the NVRAM and associated reading/writing interface.

      I used to work in a company that had just under a 1000 Apple macintoshes. Some of the early NICs used only a small part of the unique range available. Some NICs with the same MAC were very common. I think our record was 5 NICs with the same MAC from one shipment. (Luckly it could be changed using software from Apple. The NIC was a chip on the motherboard, so its not like we could replace it with another.)

      PS: The MACs were being used as part of a larger access control system. (It was a police department)

    13. Re:what about the innocent? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      (many manufacturers have more than one)

      I remember Apple having 2, they flipped the bytes wrongly when they sent it on the wire, then they corrected it. So instead of recalling all those NICs, they just assigned Apple both permutations.

  10. Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The usual point of a petition is to demonstrate to people the mass rejection the public are showing their idea. Returning a million AOL CDs doesn't, IMHO, do this; it just tells AOL that their brand awareness campaign is working (and I dare say AOL know how many they have made).

    If you want it stopped, hit them where it hurts - put a return-to-sender sticker on them, make AOL pay for the postage, or handle them one-by-one, or see if you can use that German law about making retailers pay the cost of removing and disposing of excess packaging... I'm not a genius (I used to be, but I'm told I'm not any more) but surely we can come up with something more persuasive than a one-off dump of a large single load of CDs.

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    1. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by 1DarkZen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not a genius (I used to be, but I'm told I'm not any more)

      You must have gotten married.

      --

      "If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer
    2. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat · · Score: 3, Funny


      You must have gotten married.

      9 years ago, but I know what you mean.

      Cute kids (on your halloween photos) - I bet you can't tell me the trade-off was worth it...

      --
      T

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    3. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cute kids (on your halloween photos) - I bet you can't tell me the trade-off was worth it...

      Shit.. that was supposed to say "wasn't worth it" - no offence intended.... just a little late at night here in the UK, and the odd Freudian slip...

      --
      Tim

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    4. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by LagDemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't bother doing the return to sender bit. The CDs are sent 4th class bulk mail - if the post ofice sees one being returned, it goes straight to the trash.

      --


      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
    5. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      Again (tho you're not to know), I have to say that I'm not living in the US, and whilst what you say may be true for you (I'm assuming, maybe incorrectly, that you are in the US), different laws about return mail apply elsewhere.

      A million CD's returned in one job lot go in the bin in one motion, but a million CDs returned one-at-a-time cost a hell of a lot more to process.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    6. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by David+Walker · · Score: 1

      Question number four on nomoreaolcds.com's FAQ - AOL doesn't see those disks and doesn't have to pay any more postage, it's just more work for the post office guys

    7. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by jfreis · · Score: 1

      maybe dump them all on the marketing directors front lawn to make it a little more personal... anyone have an address?

    8. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you want it stopped, hit them where it hurts - put a return-to-sender sticker on them, make AOL pay for the postage


      In the US just write "refused. return to sender" on the package and stick it in a mailbox.
    9. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by jcpii · · Score: 1

      So, like I said in an earlier post...

      You should keep all those CDs. Then tile the ceiling of your bedroom like a mirror, take a picture or two like this, and send them to the AOL execs. They can be comforted in knowing that they brought it upon themselves... kinda.

    10. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best plan I have thought of to date: Class action Lawsuit.

      I have spoken with a lawyer who agreed with the following:

      When Junk mail arrives I can throw it away or recycle it. Its my choice and there are options available. When I recieve an AOL disk I am under the burden of disposing of it VIA a landfill using my trash can. I have limited space in my trash, (it really is very small and only goes out everyother week, thats the way my city is...). Therefore, this company is putting undue burden on myself and my community and as such should have to pay for disposal costs and possibly damages..

    11. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by Kraaaaaaaag · · Score: 1

      Well, we could all file USPS form 1500 (Application for Listing and/or Prohibitory Order for unwanted sexually oriented advertising in your mail).

    12. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      Now thats what I like to hear... do AOL CD's in the US have the same "connie" girl on the cober that we get here in the UK, the one who wears make-up to look like CoCo the clown ?? Surely make-up that bad only occurs in pr0n.

      In Germany there was a suggestion of a rule whereby retailers would have to take back (and dispose of in a ecological way) excess packing materials for goods - could our Teutonic friends claim the service was intangible (10 days free trial) and the entire CD is excess packaging ??

      We nearly got this law in the UK (it might be a European Directive, but it might never have been passed) but the big retailers lobbied hard and claimed it would destroy the ecomomy...

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    13. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by doublem · · Score: 2

      >put a return-to-sender sticker on them, make AOL pay for the postage

      Guess what bright boy?

      It's NOT First Class Mail. It goes into the Post Office Dead Letter bin.

      You just advised people to raise our postage rates, thank you very much.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    14. Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      Guess what bright boy?
      It's NOT First Class Mail. It goes into the Post Office Dead Letter bin.
      You just advised people to raise our postage rates, thank you very much.


      No, I advised people to try and think of something more effective than a petition (note, I didn't insult the petition or the people doing it, I just made the point that I didn't think it would carry much weight), and gave a few starter ideas of the sorts of things that they might want to think about. If I was proposing any of them as a complete solution I would have said so.

      And AOL is a global phenomenon - who said anything about the US postal system anyway ? I didn't... and not every country follows the same rules as the US.

      If you'll forgive my directness, your sarcasm seems a little rich here given that you're the one leaping to assumptions, and pouncing on one point as if it was the entirety of my comment. You're not the only one to do precisely this, so maybe I'm unfairly tarring you with the sum of faults of others, but I'm asking you to back off and think of something that could help, rather than simply throwing rocks - criticism is more effective if you offer something constructive at the same time.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
  11. At last by bryhhh · · Score: 2, Funny

    woohoo!

    Now I can buy myself an Xbox on my CaptialOne card.

    1. Re:At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      via your temporary AOL account that came with the CD.

    2. Re:At last by slasher+guy · · Score: 1

      But you (luckily?) can't play AOL Cd's on it.

  12. RE: Cryptonomicron by usmcpanzer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just recently (a weeka ago?) purchased the book in the US, and the Quicksilver part is in the back. Can't say I've read it yet, tho.

  13. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is Slashback

    1. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love this whole "IN SOVIET RUSSIA" thing, but jesus christ that was a pathetic attempt. It doesn't make sense.

      IN SOVIET RUSSIA, coasters send you AOL.

    2. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Soviet Russia:

      1. 1. Profit!
      2. 2. ????
      3. 3. Collect Underpants.
    3. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. That would be good, except for the duplicate numbers. You put each number twice...two failures in a row.
      Also, who is that "IF I EVER MEET YOU I WILL KICK YOUR ASS" guy? He's cool, too.

  14. Changing serial numbers and macs... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So they said they changed their serial number *and* MAC address to get back on. This is interesting and points back to something someone said in a previous thread. All you need to do is to make a program to burn through serial number space and get them marked invalid, and you've got a DoS of entertaining proportions.

    1. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by jandrese · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This raises a couple of interesting questions.

      1. Are X-Box serial numbers laid out in some predictable pattern (sequentally for instance?). And if not: 2. Just how big IS that serial number space. Something tells me it's of BIGNUM proportions and it's the kind of thing that you woudn't be able to burn through in your lifetime.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by killmenow · · Score: 1

      The answer there is to have a distributed client. Set up a server or three to dole out portions of that space to Xboxen that have been moded and let a few hundred (or maybe even thousand) DDoS XBox Live.

      Sort of a fsck-msft-xbox-live@Home dealio...

    3. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by einstein · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you might not be able to burn through it, but you could sure make a bunch of people who haven't hacked their X-boxes calling up MS complaining about how they can't use the X-box-live features, and demanding to know why.
      --

    4. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by still_sick · · Score: 2

      you might not be able to burn through it, but you could sure make a bunch of people who haven't hacked their X-boxes calling up MS complaining about how they can't use the X-box-live features, and demanding to know why

      And this is a good thing why?

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    5. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I hope that anyone caught doing that would get life in prison. I can;t believe that you people are actually suggesting/advocating such a thing. You people don't care who you fuck over just to get everything your way. Bunch of self serving mother fucking assholes.

    6. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      Right-O! Then this next story is obviously for you! ;)

    7. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because then l33t kiddies can have their game for free and keep on stealing

    8. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing to people who are assholes, and those who don't know the difference between rights and privileges.

    9. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by SectoidRandom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simply because this will result in nothing but Microsoft's complete reversal of policy towards chips on line! If a significant proportion legitimate users are banned because of what amounts to a design flaw in the system, the system has to change.

    10. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Much as i think it would be fun to stick it microsoft by DoSing their xbox network, you'll probably be labled a 'cybercriminal' and the FBI will show up at your door in suits and sunglasses. Or they'll find some way to apply the DMCA to hold you without bail. Or if not, they'll buy a new law that says they can.
      Game Over, Dude. We loose.

    11. Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      Well, a MAC is 6 pairs of hex digits. 12 digits total, 16^12 or 256*2^40 (trillion) combinations.

      If you want 1/1000 of 1% of MACs banned and you have 1000 Xboxen calling up with new MACs to ban every 5 seconds, it'll take you 163 days.

      Now, each manufacturer gets a code in the first 3 pairs (IIRC) so once you know the manufacturer's code for the Xboxen, you're probably talking about more like 16^6 different combos, which is only 16M. It'd take 10 Xboxen (as above) a mere 3 months to burn through the *entire* address space. They're what, $300 each? I'm sure *someone* has 3 grand to buy Xboxen and try this out. Besides, I'll bet you could sell them for way more than $300 when you were done. I can see it on eBay now: "Own one of 10 limited-edition X-box consoles that brought down Microsoft's X-box Live service! Mods included. A steal at $500."

  15. Actual use for AOL CD's by coryboehne · · Score: 5, Funny

    The other evening (without an internet connection) I was trying to install the .Net framework (dotnetfx.exe) on my laptop and since I had installed windows 98 the version of Internet Explorer was 5.00.x but due to the dependencies of the .Net framework I needed to have 5.01 or later.

    As an aside, when you don't have 5.01 or later it just kills the browser that you do have installed, so it kinda causes a really fun catch-22, no browser to surf the web to find a new browser..... Really sucked.

    Anyway, back with my story.... I was on a frantic search for a copy of IE 5.01 or later when I remembered that I had a stockpile of those AOL Cd's in the garage... I grabbed myself one of them (yellow, no idea what version) and proceeded to find the IE directory on the disc.. Sure enough it was version 5.01.x so I installed it and everything went smoothly from there.

    So, the moral of the story? Sometimes AOL disks do have a use other than coasters or frisbees....

    1. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by peacefinder · · Score: 1
      As an aside, when you don't have 5.01 or later it just kills the browser that you do have installed, so it kinda causes a really fun catch-22, no browser to surf the web to find a new browser..... Really sucked.


      Well, you know, if'n yer that desperate, try ftp.netscape.com. Remember anonymous FTP?

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    2. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by coryboehne · · Score: 1

      do you really think the _average_ user know what FTP is? I doubt it... I especially doubt that they would know to look in the right directory.....

      I on the other hand do indeed know how to use FTP and would have done just that, except for that tiny little problem with not having any sort of connectivity.....

    3. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by David+Walker · · Score: 1

      Another good use is as a decoration! I have a friend who hung a bunch of AOL CDs a foot or so from his ceiling on fishing line - it was really cool when he brought in the strobe lights and disco ball!

    4. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by suricatta · · Score: 1

      AOL and moral in the same line of text? That's almost an oxymoron! :)

    5. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the day I used to use them for coasters, but since the advent of cheap cd burners I have had more coasters than I need.

    6. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time, keep lynx (http://jim.spath.com/lynx_win32/) around on some floppy somewhere (the zip file is 731559 octets). Then you hacve something to download a graphical browser with (like mozilla). (Don't just download mozilla now and expect to use that in future - you'll end up with a really old version when you actually need it. This also goes for IE. It doesn't really matter that lynx will be ancient - you'll only need it for downloading a "proper" web browser.)

      What's wrong with DotGNU (http://www.dotgnu.org) anyway?

    7. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by pknoll · · Score: 1
      a really fun catch-22, no browser to surf the web to find a new browser

      ftp, baby. ftp.

      You remember ftp, don't ya?

    8. Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      No offense meant. It sounded from your post like you did have connectivity, but no browser. [shrug] I've run across folks who were proficient with FTP 10 years ago, but didn't think anyone still ran anon ftp servers. Just jogging the memory.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  16. AOL CD's are awsome... by BSOD+from+above · · Score: 5, Funny

    when you cook them in the microwave for 15 seconds. Just don't try this with anything you care about.

    --
    Karma: Censored (mostly affected by decency laws)
    1. Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by cscx · · Score: 2

      Oh, BTW, don't sniff the fumes that are released either.

    2. Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by F2F · · Score: 2

      shit! am I _that_ old?

      i remember when slashdot _announced_ that cd-s can be microwaved for fun and profit!

      damn... *sip* ...damn

      senility is next, i s'pose...

    3. Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by terkozer · · Score: 1
      I agree wholeheartedly sir!! Checkout this pretty picture of what happens when you do the aforementioned.

      In case anybody needs instructions, here's a nice concise HOWTO

    4. Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      heh, I remember that too. I wonder if that is still in the archives?

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    5. Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by Road · · Score: 1

      You're 6!? Man your old. Buy me some beer?

  17. xbox serial number by FeatherBoa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Team Assembly managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox

    Not only that, you can arrange for any arbitrary XBox to be permanently banned!
    I wonder if there's a way to pollute their blacklist with so many bogus entries that they have to give up.

    1. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cool idea, but maybe they also associate the serial numbers with a telephone number used to dial into the network. Even if you do burn through a huge amount of MAC space, it'd only be for your phone number.

    2. Re:xbox serial number by donutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if there's a way to pollute their blacklist with so many bogus entries that they have to give up.

      Probably not easily. Out of all the Xboxen sold, I'd guess it's a small percentage of gamers who go online with them...so you'd have to get a list of serials for those gamers...then dial in to the service with each and every one of them....sounds like a tedious task that really isn't worth it unless you're hell-bent on pissing off Microsoft.

    3. Re:xbox serial number by m1a1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there's a way to pollute their blacklist with so many bogus entries that they have to give up.

      Ingenious. All anybody who wanted to do that would need to do is write some sort of script/program, that increments serial and mac and logs in. Gets kicked. Increment, log in, get kicked.

      I would imagine you could do it with a shell script if you had linux installed on it.

    4. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except they don't know what number you dialed in from. or you might have broadband.

    5. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh gee! I'm sure glad there is no one out there hell-bent on pissing off Microsoft.

    6. Re:xbox serial number by pythas · · Score: 2

      The XBox is broadband only. Maybe by IP address, but that would be difficult with many ISPs.

    7. Re:xbox serial number by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How very intelligent.

      MS Rep1: Hmm, some dumbshit is logging in with sequental serial numbers from IP address 123.456.789.012.

      MS Rep2: What an idiot... send the death squads.

      Honestly, MS is going to figure out a way to stop that kind of thing very easily.

    8. Re:xbox serial number by killmenow · · Score: 1
      ...task that really isn't worth it unless you're hell-bent on pissing off Microsoft.
      Umm, check your audience...
    9. Re:xbox serial number by shogun · · Score: 2

      I would imagine you could do it with a shell script if you had linux installed on it.

      Or even better dont even use an X-Box, just code up some program on a standard PC that pretends to be an X-Box to the Live service and supply whatever serial number/mac address you want..

    10. Re:xbox serial number by kscguru · · Score: 1
      I wonder if the serial number / MAC address go only to the MS server. If they let this info get down to other clients as some sort of unique ID, they've just created a HUGE hole... (and now I'm wondering if this would be DMCA violation material). If so, this is a purely idiotic design - and call this an academic criticism.

      Anyway, who's idea was it to make GUIDs have the MAC address inside? MS already has a love affair with GUIDs (just look at the mess called COM), but putting identifying information into a supposedly unique number strikes me as a really bad decision. I.e. one of the worst in history for privacy concerns. Something like this is a disaster waiting to happen.

      Privacy and security are related. Because the first attacks against a secure system are to take multiple pieces of "private" information and cross-index it. Ignore privacy, and you've just weakened security. Think, peoples. Think.

      --

      A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

    11. Re:xbox serial number by Lethyos · · Score: 1

      MS Rep1: Hmm, some dumbshit is logging in with sequental serial numbers from IP address 123.456.789.012.

      In Microsoft's own little world, this is a valid assertion. Luckily, in the real world, such an IP address doesn't exist, so there is no risk to anyone. We should be quite safe. Start the DoS.

      --
      Why bother.
    12. Re:xbox serial number by srn_test · · Score: 5, Funny
      Or even better dont even use an X-Box, just code up some program on a standard PC that pretends to be an X-Box to the Live service and supply whatever serial number/mac address you want..

      Then make it the payload of the next Outlook worm...

    13. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Until someone writes a software emulator of the initial connection sequence. At this point, you stop needing a real XBox to do the connection, so you piggyback it onto your favourite DDOS tool.

      There's a certain irony involved in getting a few million Windoze boxens to break Microsoft's own security mechanisms.

    14. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how about all the poor gamers that just want to play? I would personally kick the fucking shit out of someone that I knew had done something like that on purpose and knocked me off line.

      Microsoft may be the big bad guys, but I'd trust them a 1000 times more than any one of you assholes.

    15. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting IP spoofing. You KNOW the negotiating protocol (or should before attempting to send a million bogus numbers), so you never need to hear back from the server. Just kick off packets at the expected time. Send from a different IP each negotiation session (i.e. with a different xbox id). So you don't kill every single id you want (from random packet loss) -- you'll get enough to annoy... Isn't that the point?

    16. Re:xbox serial number by fermion · · Score: 1
      You know, it may be getting easier to 'borrow' an internet connection

      For instance, In houston there is a lot of downtown office space. In particular large sections of larger building are empty due to the failure of a particular energy company, and the repercussions thereof. I wonder if all the connections have been cut off. Would it be possible to sneak in, drop of a modded XBox, and let the DOS attack ensue,

      Likewise is there any reason why a wifi port could not be attached to the modded Xbox, The XBox could be driven around, doing the damage as it captured wireless networks.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    17. Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unless someone releases an open source software that emulate an xbox logging-in the live service.

      that way many users can help with the banfest, and therefore, make it hard to detect such

      -Marton

    18. Re:xbox serial number by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1
      Re banning arbitrary serial nos.


      really isn't worth it unless you're hell-bent on pissing off Microsoft


      Or more likely, hell-bent on pissing off the guys who fragged you.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    19. Re:xbox serial number by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah? and what if that ip address just so happens to originate from some rural area in mainland china? What death squad attacks those conniving rice farmers who play xbox live?

    20. Re:xbox serial number by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Out of all the Xboxen sold, I'd guess it's a small percentage of gamers who go online with them

      You obviously don't work at a gaming store. I work at a gaming store (a boutique, if you will) in a smallish city (~60k), where broadband is surprisingly uncommon (and sucks), and we haven't been able to keep our XBox Live kits on the shelf. For that matter, we never had any on the shelf, they were all preordered. Even our XBox rep was amazed at how many we've sold ('That's amazing. That's absolutely amazing.')

      I'd say it's a fairly big percentage, considering how the Live kit just came out, and it'll only get bigger as time goes on.

      --Dan

    21. Re:xbox serial number by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "I wonder if there's a way to pollute their blacklist with so many bogus entries that they have to give up."

      I don't see it working:

      Nov 22 20:49:20 xbl-auth MOD-check: Banned serial number "1234-1234", account "Slashdot Fan 2002"
      Nov 22 20:49:21 xbl-auth MOD-check: Banned serial number "1234-1235", account "Slashdot Fan 2002"
      Nov 22 20:49:22 xbl-auth MOD-check: Banned serial number "1234-1236", account "Slashdot Fan 2002"
      Nov 22 20:49:23 xbl-auth MOD-check: Banned serial number "1234-1237", account "Slashdot Fan 2002"
      Nov 22 20:49:24 xbl-auth MOD-check: Banned serial number "1234-1238", account "Slashdot Fan 2002"

      The next morning, someone in the XBL division looks at the log files, unbans the serial numbers, pulls up the billing information for "Slashdot Fan 2002", and possibly initiates legal action against Slashdot Fan 2002 (by attempting to equate the serial number spoofing to fraud or account cracking; such claims could be further helped depending on how the network ToS is worded). The easiest part comes from the fact that they already have all your personal info -- there's no dynamic IP address hassle and no need to subpoena the ISP for more information (unless the case gets really serious).

  18. I agree with this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    cook them in the microwave for 15 seconds. Just don't try this with anything you care about.

    I tried this with my hamster, Duffy, and the only sparks that flew were from my mom when she found hamster hair in the casserole.

    Don't microwave things you care about, people.

  19. So NVIDIA is not kicking ATIs butt... by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    Remember ATI is the 500lb Gorilla here, not NVIDIA. ATI just woke up in time to see NVIDIA trying to sneak in on its graphics card market and put the smacketh down, respectfully.

    Lets see NVIDIA wake up and charge a little less that the 1/2 a grand they seem to think their metal is worth...

    1. Re:So NVIDIA is not kicking ATIs butt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATI is the 500lb Gorilla here, not NVIDIA

      ATI has a market cap of about $600 million less than Nvidia, that doesn't exactly qualify them as the 500 pound gorilla.

    2. Re:So NVIDIA is not kicking ATIs butt... by Erik+Fish · · Score: 2

      As the Coward pointed out: You're wrong about Nvidia being the gorilla.

      Even if ATI was the top financial dog it doesn't matter -- both companies make most of their money on low end cards anyway.

  20. Re:SLASHBACK -- errr ... by timothy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're right. Thanks. I should take up drinking coffee, I guess.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  21. AOL CD's by obiedxss · · Score: 1

    I also hate AOL and I wish to collect AOL installation disks. I have 768 so far, and I want to reach 1,000,001.

    Send contributions to SmarterChild@aol.com

    --
    pirates
    1. Re:AOL CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hmmm, that's original.

    2. Re:AOL CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I hate AOL Install Disks"

      said smarterchild@AOL.COM

  22. Late Show with David Letterman website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anyone notice how Letterman's website won't play RealVideo clips from Mozilla? Try clicking on "Big Show Highlight" under the DaveTV section (requires JavaScript).

    The interesting thing is that if you use the Preferences Toolbar (download here) to change the user-agent string to, say, NS 6.2 Lin or IE 6.0 WinXP, it works just fine.

    -CF

  23. AOLandfill Halloween Costume by Aexia · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Saturday night before Halloween I had a costume party to go to. I remembered this Saturday morning. Or rather, Saturday afternoon since that's when I actually woke up. I had no costume.

    But I did have a bunch of crap CDs, some of which were AOL CDs. So I taped them together and went as AOLandfill. Had about strips of 6-7 down each a leg, a sort of vest and a couple on my forearms. Truth be told, it did look like some low-rent Power Ranger battle armour or something, but once I said the name, people thought it was funny.

    I also got to use pickup lines like
    Try me free for 1000 hours for your first month!
    I'm so easy to use it's no wonder I'm number one!

    The terrifying part of the costume may have been how well those lines worked.

    1. Re:AOLandfill Halloween Costume by InsaneFolder · · Score: 1

      Heard a story of people making a coat of scale mail from AOL CD's, the "You've Got Mail" mail. Can't seem to find pictures around about it, though.

      --

      -InsaneFolder
      My other char is '!'
  24. Re:Write to the people at CapitalOne. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, this troll is the same list that appeared in yesterday's Slashdot article "Retailers Swing DMCA To Stop 'Black Friday' Sale Info" (see this). Moderators, please DO NOT mod the parent up!

  25. Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1
    Wow!! What a nice gesture!! You don't like my product so you won't be using it....then you are kind enough to return my promotional and advertisement materials to me free of charge so I can avoid the costs of having 1 Million more CD's made. Very nice guy!!! Saving AOL what must be several hundreds of thousands of dollars in CD pressing and printing fees has to be the nicest gesture I've ever heard of :-)

    "If they reach their goal ... I'd be happy to give them directions and greet them at the door ... We would make a contribution ourselves to put them over the top" - Yes...I'm sure he would. This guy will obviously get a nice bonus check for all the money he saved his company.

    --

    "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
    -Thucydides

    1. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by pheared · · Score: 5, Informative

      A pity you didn't read the original article.

      It would have saved you from looking stupid, since it states that they will be scratching each CD so they can't be used again.

    2. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1
      Whoopsie. Well, at least I feel good knowing that I made you feel better about yourself through pointing out other peoples flaws. If I hadn't goofed...well...who knows. You may not have had someone to point at and laugh about to boost your own self esteem :-) Those of us lowly non-humans who are not perfect such as yourself may make small mistakes such as in thinking that they remembered the original story that was posted several months ago?? And we also use run-on sentences as often as possible as to avoid the nasty punctuation stuff that a lot of people use to make their sentences textbook perfect so that they can impress all the smart people and laugh at all the dumm peeple liek m'eye self.

      In any case...Imagine the wonderful free marketing tool this can be for AOL. :-)

      Have a wonderful evening.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    3. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by pheared · · Score: 1

      Sillycon rabbit, the bible is fiction.

      I guess this is the part where you're "taking it well" while at the same time attempting to introduce some character assassination.

      Unfortunately for you, you are a member of the group that you detailed. Consider your original post. I suppose the thick sarcasm was meant to be informative, rather than insulting. Thought you got them good, didn't you?

      Lesson to learn might be that you ought not attack when you haven't bothered to do your homework. Oh yeah I forgot, the original post was in the past. That was hard to tell from the nature of the Slashback article. Oh and I think Slashdot hasn't a search capability.

      Bumbklaat.

    4. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1

      "Sillycon rabbit, the bible is fiction."
      Of course it is, no sarcasm intended at all. I think it's simply disgusting that so many people believe in these mystical gods that control and create everything. The worst of it is that they impose upon me laws and rules that are based upon their religion.


      "Unfortunately for you, you are a member of the group that you detailed. Consider your original post. I suppose the thick sarcasm was meant to be informative, rather than insulting. Thought you got them good, didn't you?"
      Actually, this all relates to the fact that I thought I had remembered the article stating that they were stringing them all up on a stringer and nothing more. I didn't feel the need to research it as I was sure that I remembered the original article. Surely you cannot possibly be so arrogant as to imply that you have never erred in a similar manner.


      "Lesson to learn might be that you ought not attack when you haven't bothered to do your homework. Oh yeah I forgot, the original post was in the past. That was hard to tell from the nature of the Slashback article. Oh and I think Slashdot hasn't a search capability."
      Actually, I think a better lesson here is that humans are not infallible; it's really not necessary to flame someone rather than inform them in an attempt to show off your intellectual prowess. If this was the "norm" we would all live in a world of assholes.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    5. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by pheared · · Score: 1

      Now if you'll please turn your attention to the last post, you'll see an example of a strawman argument. Observe:
      Surely you cannot possibly be so arrogant as to imply that you have never erred in a similar manner.

      As you can see, the subject subtly changed the focus of the argument from his own actions to whether someone could possibly be infallible. Naturally, this is an easy argument for anyone to prove, thus the straw man has been setup. This is a trick used, often inadvertently, by arguers. Of course, the original issue was not whether I have ever made an error, and the argument proves nothing.

    6. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1

      Ok man, I see no "straw man" arguement here. I am not trying to hide a position I cannot defend. Guilty as charged...I thought I remembered the original posting and therefore did not feel that I had to reference it once again. The previous statement leaves nothing more to debate, you win...I have proven your point for you. I thought I had made this abundantly clear already. All that I am stating now is that the manner in which you replied to it was purely to be an asshole and nothing more. You are attempting to debate an arguement that doesn't exist!! Let me reiterate for you so that you may better comprehend. Yes...I fucked up. I thought I had my proverbial ducks in a goddamned row and posted what I thought was correct. I now know that I was not correct. You win....thats it....nothing more. There is no debate and there most definitely is not any form of "straw man" arguement here as that would require a disagreement of some kind. Grow the hell up and attempt to find better ways to feel good about yourself that don't involve the need to point out other peoples flaws and gloat in your own perceived superiority. Yes....different topic...not the same debate. You "won?" the original one....and as far as I'm concerned I have spoken my peace and my conversation here has now ended.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    7. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by pheared · · Score: 1

      You excitable types are fun to bait.

      poop.

  26. Easily solved.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once they inspect the source IP and simply reverse the transactions that occured within the past few hours. You'll likely end up removing everyone who is on your local ISP from using Live! than anything else.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Easily solved.. by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      You'll still cause ripples, and at least for a few hours, you could cause massive network disruption.

      Also, since you don't need any reply back (I assume), what's to stop you from forging your IP address?

      Even if they were to nullify all bannings in a certain time period, all you have to do is leave it running, initiating a ban every few hours. They'll be so spread out that they can't be effectively isolated.

  27. Trolling on Slashdot Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has anyone given it a good go?
    I've seen a goatse link or two.

  28. AOL CDs in the Post Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    anyone else seens those displays of aol disks being given away in the P.O.?

    Take a few every time you visit....aol will think idiots are signing up and restock them, and if you keep the dispensers empty, you'll being doing a public service by sparing some n00b from the awful aol experience while attriting aol's resources

    1. Re:AOL CDs in the Post Office by molywi · · Score: 1

      or you could just leave them there so AOL will stop restocking them thus making less cd's and making less of an impact on the enviroment - all those aol cd's cant be too good for the EARTH

  29. Happy birthday who? by aster_ken · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who is fkp, and why are we wishing this person a happy birthday?

    1. Re:Happy birthday who? by aster_ken · · Score: 1

      Hey, now! That's not off-topic! It's in the "from the happy-birthday-to-fkp dept." just under the title! I knew I should have posted that anonymously!

    2. Re:Happy birthday who? by mraymer · · Score: 1

      Do not worry, my friend. I just metamoderated the moderation in question as unfair. You've been vindicated! ;)

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  30. AOL cd's how many do you have by headbulb · · Score: 1

    I have over 5000 I figure take a few box's, save a few souls.

  31. Capitalone has worked with Moz. for a long time. by dameron · · Score: 1

    I've been happily paying my online account via Mozilla (on Redhat 7.2, then 7.3)for at least five months now.

    I used to use Opera disguised as IE, but for the past five months (since mid-June when I got a new laptop) I've been using Opera sans javascript, so I know I wasn't dreaming when I paid all those charges...

    I hope.

    -dameron

  32. Nvidia not news ?!?! by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, the same features implemented under ATI are documented but guess what...They will WORK for Nvidia, and they DON'T NOW for ATI.....

    ATI support is about the worst I've ever had the misfortune to need to deal with. The actually make M$ support look forthcoming and really eager to please. 4 rev's of ATI's so called catalyst drivers and things are actually sort of stable, but a slew of games won't run under the 9700pro, for example M$ CFS3 does not recognize the driver set up. If you are thinking about buying a video card I suggest as someone who has a Radeon 9700pro and a nvidia 460, I'd get a cheap GF3 or 4200 and wait and see the NV30. Unless you have money to just burn, ATI has dissapointed again, and they've not corrected any of this All in One Wonder driver issues either....

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Nvidia not news ?!?! by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      I know you're just trolling here, but the real issue is not that some features aren't as good, it's that Nvidia just didn't bother to implement something that ATI and Matrox did implement and is part of the DirectX 9.0 spec. Namely hardware displacement mapping. Hard for it to work on the GeForce FX and not on the Radeon when Nvidia didn't even implement it, huh?

      God I'm tired of people liking things because they're a fanboy for the brand.

    2. Re:Nvidia not news ?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I have few gfx cards around due to my work (nvidia, ati, matrox..) and I had problems with all of them, but the worse ones so far have been with nvidia, hanging the PC..... and the latest detonator drivers simply don't work....on the on the other hand, my radeon 7500 at home seems to work fine. I think that more of the drivers been bad, it seems to me that is more due to the gfx drivers/motherboard drivers combination......

      my 2 cents....

    3. Re:Nvidia not news ?!?! by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      Agreed, ATI has never made my old AIW pro card work right under ANY OS. How old is that card? WTF is their excuse?
      ATI:Yeah we'll sell you hardware, just don't expect it to work correctly.
      That's why I bought an NVIDIA card last year. Yeah, the TV-in/out isn't as nice as that of the all-in-wonder series, but at least it works. Even under linux.
      Oh yeah, that's right too, NVIDIA actually releases linux drivers. And they actually support them. I sent their support email a message just to thank them for doing this (and to let them know it's why I bought an NVIDIA card) and I got a message back within two days saying "thanks for the encouragement"


      I realize I'm just one person with one type of ATI card, but has anybody else read about all the driver issues they've had? Just the issues with their radeon series have been pretty bad.

      So yeah everyone can, go ahead and scoff at NV's newest card because ATI already has a card out with those features. I'll wait to buy a card from a company that doesn't have so many driver issues.
      BTW, I haven't blacklisted ATI forever. They can redeem themselves if the want. But it's porbably going to take a year of no more driver bs for me to ever want anything from them.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  33. More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's even worse than that. Suppose some malicious hacker starts logging into their online systems with a modded system that has a random serial number, with the sole intent of making that number unusable in the online service. The legitimate owner of the box with that number will be denied online service forever. This process can probably be automated.

    Is it possible for someone to sufficiently pollute the MS online database that they will have to change their "lifetime ban" procedures? Or at least, to cause MS a severe case of trouble over it?

    1. Re:More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it possible for someone to sufficiently pollute the MS online database that they will have to change their "lifetime ban" procedures? Or at least, to cause MS a severe case of trouble over it?

      Nope - all they have to do is have it check by IP address, too. If the same IP address keeps getting banned on different MAC addresses, shut down that IP address. Problem solved.

    2. Re:More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

      You must be the tenth person to suggest such a scandalous act.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    3. Re:More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by xenode · · Score: 1

      That'd be nice if they had good measures to detect repeated bannings from the same IP addy, but it will probably take some rogue users getting a large number of MAC/serial combos banned before they really do anything about that.

  34. Are there cheats (yet)? by pigeon768 · · Score: 1
    What you should be asking yourself is: is it moral for you to go online, with your modchip, and screw over people who want to play online without dealing with cheaters? Is it? I don't think so.

    Are there cheats for online games? If not, are there any being attempted?

    The major opposition to mod chips, that I've seen is the belief that it fosters cheating. Is this a real concern or is it just supposition?

    If there are cheats being used and circulated, then ban them. If not, having a DiVX and ogg/vorbis player for your TV sounds damned cool.

    1. Re:Are there cheats (yet)? by Boone^ · · Score: 2

      So does Microsoft do 1 thing now, then when cheats available to they start banning? They're trying to keep a relatively simple thing like an online game service secured. If you bought your XBox for DiVX or ogg/vorbis play, you shouldn't care about the Live service.

    2. Re:Are there cheats (yet)? by windex · · Score: 2

      Cheating, on the software level, with Gamesharks and any in game memory editor, had been a serious problem with online game play on the Dreamcast in the past (it still is, actually, but who the hell still uses their dreamcast is beyond me). Good example, research player killing in the "no player killing allowed or even possible" game Phantasy Star Online.

    3. Re:Are there cheats (yet)? by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      I think the correct term would be automation. Sure, nobody would cheat, but people would do nasty things. A computer can usually play better than a human (the only reason it doesn't always win is that it purposely dumbs itself down), and therefore you could automate it to fire, aim, etc.

  35. For shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Welcome to slashdot. Where personal liberties are above everything else. Mine, that is. Fuck your liberties. I will (possibly) steal your xbox serial number and get it banned because I'm an idiot and forgot to turn of my modchip while trying to connect to xbox live. Now, you will suffer. Of course, MY liberties are all that matters. So go fuck yourself.

    Sincerely,
    A Typical Slashdotter

  36. Once again, think of context. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't forge the IP address easily. Not unless you've already owned all the routers between you and their Live! servers. And if that was the case, why not just own the servers and be done with it?

    And you also assume that they won't take legal action against someone who is distrupting thousands or millions of people from enjoying a service they are paying for.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Once again, think of context. by swillden · · Score: 3

      Nonsense. At most you only have to own the first router or two, and then only if your ISP does address filtering (most don't, simply because it takes bigger routers, although they all really should).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Once again, think of context. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The explicit assumption of the OP was that you don't need to see the reply packets, so why would you need to own the routers in between? Just let the reply packets go off to never-never land.

      AC
      --

    3. Re:Once again, think of context. by quitcherbitchen · · Score: 1

      You could route it through an anonymous proxy. Possibly one on a hacked Windows machine. I'm sure there are at least a few vulnerabilities to let you do just a thing.

      This is just one example of how attackers mask their location.

    4. Re:Once again, think of context. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plz pck up a bk and rd abt "cnctn orntd prtcls", sch as tcp. also, plz die, tks.

    5. Re:Once again, think of context. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      As others have pointed out, just make it the activity of a bunch of boxes owned for a DDOS attack.

      Or, hell, the payload of the next great outlook worm.

  37. capital one by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "It seems CapitalOne's website works with Mozilla, as of this November, 2002. This is good news because many people have CapitalOne credit cards, and previously the site required Microsoft's Intarweb Explorer. This just shows how simply speaking up by e-mailing large companies can evoke change."

    Excellent. Now keep speaking up and make sure they know that you are pleased to be able to continue giving them your business because they respect your personal choices.

    My bank in canada always had a Mozilla friendly site and I made sure I sent them a nice e-mail thanking them ,describing exactly why I prefer to use their services as opposed to my previous bank.

    Positive feedback is just as important as negative feedback!

  38. Please see my other comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other comment here.

    Why would MS be responsible for offerring a refund to someone who violates the service agreement? Termination of service without compensation is exactly what these modders should have expected, it's spelled out in the service agreement.

    I know, they just hit Next, Next, Next, I Agree.

  39. One word: drivers. by pigeon768 · · Score: 1, Troll

    As soon as ATI gets stable, reliable, current, and unifed drivers, I'll consider buying an ATI card. Until then, I'll continue buying the best supported cards in the business. (ie, nvidia's)

    1. Re:One word: drivers. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      unifed drivers

      I don't understand why people actully consider this a feature.

      Woohoo, My driver is 90% code bloat because it supports 10 other cards too!

      Also, have you ever looked at the code for a driver that supports many revs of a chip? Lets just say that I'll be impressed if nvidia can keep it up forever.

    2. Re:One word: drivers. by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      It's a feature because instead of having to go to ATI's site and find the right driver for your card and OS, you just go to Nvidia's site and grab 1 driver that works with the entire line of TNT and GeForce cards with 1 driver for Win9x/ME and 1 driver for XP/2k.

      It's also nice having a video card that can come within about 3 FPS of performance between Windows and Linux.

    3. Re:One word: drivers. by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      It's only 3 FPS slower in Windoze?? Sure seemed like alot more to me.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    4. Re:One word: drivers. by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? 3 FPS slower in Linux. On the same hardware. Of course, I'm talking about 57 FPS vs 60 FPS. And I wasn't referring to any specific game. If you're thinking Doom 3, then, uh, haha, there is no way any current generation of Nvidia cards will be able to play that game with nearly enough detail to make it worth it. I should know. I've tried :)

  40. Never do anything.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice of Capitalone to fix their IE only policy just two weeks after I replace them with a company whose site I can actually use. Or maybe I actually caused them to change. Yeah that's it, it was all me.

    ... just in time to get monitored by the pentagon.

  41. Neal Stephenson needs to get laid by TheHumbone · · Score: 1

    Does our hero's love interest still have an Adam's Apple in the new edition?

  42. Confused.... by wilburdg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Weird. A link in the story description to a reply to that same story...

    Hmmm... But... but.... *head explodes*

    Slashdot: Successfully colapsing the known universe since...

    1. Re:Confused.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot: Successfully collapsing the known universe since... ...2012.

  43. What I'd rather see... by Bytal · · Score: 1

    is a good HOW-TO on getting those nifty AOL tin cases. I'd receive ten thousand AOL cds a day if only they sent them in tins...on second thought they can keep the cds :)

  44. xbox - roll your own network? by feepcreature · · Score: 1
    If you buy an XBox, you can do what you like with it - that's your right. By the same token, MS don't have to let you use it on their network.

    Of course, even if they have been banned, suitably hacked XBoxen could presumably use local networks or maybe even the internet (for games with weak timing requirements). LAN party anyone?

    P.

    --
    Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
  45. Quicksilver by 56 · · Score: 1

    I heard that Stephenson is writing it with a fountain pen, in an effort to keep from making it as long as Cryptonomicon. Hope he fails :)

  46. GeforceFX and 128 bit memory interfaces. by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Going back to the bad old days while the Geforce FX was a bunch of unsubtantiated rumours, I remember the furore around the theory that the FX would only have a 128 bit memory interface.

    Theory goes that by having a 128 bit interface the cards themselves are cheaper to produce. The fact that all bar one of the Radeon 9700 pro cards are using the ATI reference design is surely a testament to how much of a bitch it is to produce a 256 bit memory interface in the real world. But then they go and stick that f*cking vacuum cleaner thing on top. Are you expecting me to believe that a copper heat sink, heat pipes, and a rediculous vacuum cleaner thing is cheap to produce?

    Nah, it's panic innit. NV30 is nowhere near as fast as it should have been and they're having to overclock it's tits off to get any reasonable headway over the R300.

    Personally I blame specification overkill. Given that we won't be seeing DX9/GL2 based games for at least two years, what's the point of having 64k instruction long pipelines? Maybe nVidia are eyeing up the professional rendering market but... well... I dunno. It just seems a little over the top. The "ti200" version might be worth it, but then so is a Radeon 9700 (ordinary, not pro) and you can have that now.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  47. Re:SLASHBACK -- errr ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Since you made a point of putting it in the article, what did the headline read before?

  48. aol CDs by erikdotla · · Score: 0, Redundant

    AOL welcomes these guys because they'll recycle and resend the CDs. Congrats for helping AOL send out more CDs and save money doing it.

    A solution is to hold them until the version on the CDs becomes obsolete, and then deliver them, guaranteeing they won't recycle & resend them.

    --
    # Erik
  49. Stop the madness by Bruha · · Score: 1

    I just got a AOL 7 CD in my package you get when you change your address with the USPS.

    At least it wasnt a butterfly poster from MSN *shudders*

    Vote MSN 8 Commercials the #1 most annoying and stupid commercials!!

  50. xbox - a ban may be harder to avoid by feepcreature · · Score: 1
    It may not be as easy as all that to get round an XBox ban.

    If MS are tracking both the MAC address and the serial number (and if they capture both at manufacture, or registration for the network) then to get past a ban you'd need to get a matching PAIR of numbers - that's a lot harder than just picking any valid serial no.

    Even if they don't have that info for existing boxes, they WILL have the serial numbers, so they can treat old boxes more leniently -- at least until they grab the serial number x mac address pair the next time each XBox is used on the network.

    If there is a collision of serial number, they can invite the innocent and the "guilty" party to call an XP-style registration line where they can be lightly grilled and have their details taken before having their respective MAC addresses re-enabled. That way, if you ever forget to unmod your box before going on line, they know it's you.

    And if registration is linked to your box serial number, you'll not just be able to pick a new one without losing your hard won scores / profiles / treasures or whatever.

    Hopefully there is some reason why this won't work...

    P.

    --
    Paul "Say no to feeping creaturism"
  51. Toyota.ca vs. Mozilla success! by swordgeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When we were looking at buying a new car a few months ago, toyota.ca told me that my browser was too old, and I should use IE5 or 'better.' I wrote to 'em and complained, pointing out that people who shop carefully online for cars are likely to shop carefully for browsers as well. :-)

    A month later, there was a page up saying they were redesigning for Mozilla/Netscape7/Opera compliance.

    Today Mozilla works flawlessly, on their remarkably well designed site.

    Score one for the good guys! And I'm off to make sure Toyota knows I appreciate their effort.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Toyota.ca vs. Mozilla success! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although slightly egotistical that you think you made a difference (I imagine tons of people complained), it is never bad when companies recognize that not everyone uses IE.

    2. Re:Toyota.ca vs. Mozilla success! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      Egotistical? Not a bit! I realise that there were probably a thousand people or more that complained, but I was one of them. If I didn't complain, then there's no telling that anyone else would have.

      Put another way, if I'm apathetic then I can expect others to be so as well. If I'm active, then (hopefully) others are well. I'm a tiny part of the movement, but I _am_ part of the movement.

      And at any rate, the point was to publicly commend Toyota Canada for changing as a result of consumer opinion. As someone else said, if we're going to criticise them for being wrong, we should praise them for getting it right.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    3. Re:Toyota.ca vs. Mozilla success! by Spyky · · Score: 2

      I was pleased to see BMW update their site to support Mozilla a month or two ago.

      Previously all the menubars were severly mangled and unusable in Mozilla.

      -Spyky

  52. Re:SLASHBACK -- errr ... by anotherone · · Score: 3, Informative

    It said "Slashdot: bla"

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  53. ATI vs. NVIDIA by scotay · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a happy owner of a 9700 pro. I'm sure future buyers will be happy with the NV30.

    Despite all the puffery of the PR, they only claim about 40% increase over the 9700. 46 measly frames in Doom III with all the goods!!! Neither of these cards will run the Doom demo well! Hardly worthy of the claim creating a "new era of cinematic graphics". ATI started the new era, and NVIDIA is now matching ATI's offering with a slight increase in performance. Good job to both camps. We will all enjoy the benefits.

    Future NVIDIA purchasers will have ATI to thank for the NV30's clockspeed and required hoover for cooling. There is little doubt that if it were not for the 9700 NV30 would be delivered later or clocked lower. I think ATI really surprised NVIDIA. We shall see who has the next surprise.

    I think the big lie is that cinematic effects only begin with their deeper 2.0+ shaders. If you look at the DX9 demos from ATI, you can see the stock 2.0 pixel and vertex shaders offer plenty of opportunity for cinematic effects.

    The hoopla helps deflects attention away from NV30's lower bandwidth and poorer clockspeed-t/performace ratio compared to the 9700. I suspect the deeper shaders will not perform well for gaming and will only be used in near-real-time applications.

    Both will be decent cards that adequately handle requirements (DX9) that may only start to matter for mainstream games by the time we're debating NV40 vs. R400.

    1. Re:ATI vs. NVIDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATI and nVidia are nice and all, but has anyone tried Doom III with a 3dlabs Wildcat4 7110? I'm curious to see how a real high end card would do

  54. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If you want it stopped, hit them where it hurts - put a return-to-sender sticker on them, make AOL pay for the postage"

    As has been repeated ad nauseum both here and on their website, AOL CDs (like almost all other mailed advertisements) are sent via Standard Mail (not First Class). There is no Return to Sender bit in Standard Mail (unlike First Class).

    Besides, if they were sent First Class, the return postage has already been paid in the price of the stamp. It wouldn't hurt their wallet one way or the other.

  55. Typos Are More Important Than Facts? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    > Thanks to the AC who noticed the goofed headline
    > ("this is only a test," remember), now amended.

    Yet you never corrected the bogus "jumping genes" headline. Why is that?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  56. Happy Shithead! :) 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashback: Circumvention, AOLandfill, Scoffing
    Posted by timothy on Thursday November 21, @06:59PM
    from the happy-birthday-fkp dept.
    Slashback tonight with more on efforts to stop the flow of AOL CDs from their house to yours, getting modded XBoxes on Microsoft's network, a less optimistic look at NVIDIA's latest chip, and more. Read on for more. Update: 11/22 00:13 GMT by T: Thanks to the AC who noticed the goofed headline ("this is only a test," remember), now amended.

    Excuse me, is this the service entrance? We just posted about Microsoft blocking gamers with mod-chipped X-boxes from the Microsoft-run online gaming service; now NiteStar writes "Xbox-Scene.com just reported that a group of Xbox hackers named Team Assembly managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."

    Not so fast, mister. The Raindog writes "Since NVIDIA announced its GeForce FX graphics chip, the web has been flooded with a slew of previews and articles that do little more than regurgitate what must have been NVIDIA's official press kit. Slashdot had coverage a few days ago, but since then, a new take on NVIDIA's latest chip has surfaced without all the PR-inspired hype. As it turns out, the GeForce FX's features aren't all that remarkable next to ATI's Radeon 9700 Pro, which has been available for months now."

    I liked the old .sig about a black hole that would blot out the sun. Matthew Davis writes "CNN.com ran a story about Jim McKenna and John Lieberman back in October requesting everyone to send the CD mailers they receive to them. When they reach 1 million CDs they'll hand deliver them to AOL. In a recent article by SiliconValley.com they quote Nicholas Graham, a spokesman for AOL stating, "If they reach their goal ... I'd be happy to give them directions and greet them at the door ... We would make a contribution ourselves to put them over the top" Does that mean they're putting Jim and John's address on the top of the CD mailing list?"

    Now if only these were CD-RWs ... and they can keep sending me the nice, reusable cases, just no more paper sleeves, thanks.

    Still teasing, Stephen. foolish_child writes "Not sure if you noticed, but in the newest paperback pressing of Cryptonomicon (1 November 2002, I think) there is a chapter from Quicksilver at the back. I spotted it in the railway station in Amsterdam, so maybe it's a European edition. I have been checking to see if it was also online but have seen no sign of it - hence the heads up. I'm sure someone will scan it in soon - it is SUPERB! (read it waiting for a train) - Enoch the Red, emissary of the Royal Society, landing in 1700's Boston looking for . . someone. Scary thing is how good his research is as usual - I've just been reading up on Leibnitz and Newton and Co. and . . . you've probably seen it already but I wanted to share :)"

    This new edition of Cryptonomicon is probably in a bookstore near you already, and the book proper is (only) several months away.

    One small step for BanKind. An anonymous reader writes "It seems CapitalOne's website works with Mozilla, as of this November, 2002. This is good news because many people have CapitalOne credit cards, and previously the site required Microsoft's Intarweb Explorer. This just shows how simply speaking up by e-mailing large companies can evoke change. For more info see here."

    Slashdot Login
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Create a new account ]

    Related Links
    blocking gamers with mod-chipped X-boxes
    Xbox-Scene.com
    Team Assembly
    The Raindog
    coverage
    has surfaced
    Matthew Davis
    Jim McKenna and John Lieberman
    October
    requesting everyone to send the CD mailers
    recent article
    SiliconValley.com
    foolish_child
    more info see here
    T
    noticed the goofed headline
    More on Slashback
    Also by timothy

    Living with Darth Vader
    Slashback: Circumvention, AOLandfill, Scoffing | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 156 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold: -1: 156 comments 0: 151 comments 1: 122 comments 2: 74 comments 3: 26 comments 4: 10 comments 5: 7 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads)
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    wow (Score:-1, Troll)
    by keller999 on Thursday November 21, @07:01PM (#4727641)
    (User #589112 Info)
    FP
    [ Reply to This ]

    SLASHBACK (Score:4, Funny)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:02PM (#4727642)
    shouldn't that be slashBACK?
    from the stupid-nitpics department

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:SLASHBACK by OmniVector (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:05PM
    Re:SLASHBACK by mav[LAG] (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:06PM
    Re:SLASHBACK -- errr ... by timothy (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:16PM
    Re:SLASHBACK -- errr ... by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @08:02PM
    Re:SLASHBACK -- errr ... by anotherone (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:16PM
    Re:SLASHBACK by hvatum Thursday November 21, @07:50PM

    i was wondering how long that would take.... (Score:1)
    by edrugtrader on Thursday November 21, @07:02PM (#4727652)
    (User #442064 Info | http://www.edrugtrader.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday November 21, @06:51PM)
    i mean, the reason they caught you is you installed a system mod.... you should be able to install ANOTHER system mod to stop them from catching you. seems obvious.
    [ Reply to This ]

    BLING BLING (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:03PM (#4727653)
    I am k-rad, dawg!
    [ Reply to This ]

    Slashdot: (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:03PM (#4727657)
    Slashback?
    [ Reply to This ]

    TTT owns! (Score:-1, Troll)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:03PM (#4727658)
    Once again TTT = Time to Troll.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:TTT owns! by The Trolling Troller (Score:-1) Thursday November 21, @07:28PM

    No kidding! (Score:3, Insightful)
    by Inoshiro on Thursday November 21, @07:03PM (#4727659)
    (User #71693 Info | http://web.inoshiro.com)
    "managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."

    It's not really surprising that changing the only 2 identity-linked features on a piece of hardware would let you get past their blacklist.

    What you should be asking yourself is: is it moral for you to go online, with your modchip, and screw over people who want to play online without dealing with cheaters? Is it? I don't think so.

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:08PM
    Re:No kidding! by Zeebs (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:08PM
    Re:No kidding! by weeeee (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:07PM
    Re:No kidding! by weeeee (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:13PM
    Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:08PM
    Re:No kidding! by gvonk (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:23PM
    Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:34PM
    Re:No kidding! by CableModemSniper (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:10PM
    Re:No kidding! (Score:5, Interesting)
    by Moonshadow on Thursday November 21, @07:14PM (#4727760)
    (User #84117 Info | http://captionthis.com/)
    Heck, if you really wanted to screw MS over, it is probably possible to write a little piece of software that will run on the box, set the MAC and serial to initial values, connect, and then be banned. Increment serial and MAC and repeat. Leave running for a day or two.

    Pretty soon, EVERYONE would be banned. There's an ugly situation.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Re:No kidding! by batobin (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:21PM
    Re:No kidding! by Ravenscall (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:37PM
    Re:No kidding! by CableModemSniper (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:21PM
    Easily solved.. by Inoshiro (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:22PM
    Re:Easily solved.. by Moonshadow (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:28PM
    Once again, think of context. by Inoshiro (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:33PM
    Re:Once again, think of context. by swillden (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:00PM
    Re:Once again, think of context. by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @08:01PM
    Re:Once again, think of context. by quitcherbitchen (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:01PM
    Re:No kidding! by Moonshadow (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:43PM
    Re:No kidding! by fishbowl (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:27PM
    Re:No kidding! by Indras (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:11PM
    Re:No kidding! by qbwiz (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:11PM
    Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:11PM
    Re:No kidding! by EllF (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:13PM
    Re:No kidding! by ceejayoz (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:57PM
    Re:No kidding! by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:17PM
    Are there cheats (yet)? by pigeon768 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:31PM
    Re:Are there cheats (yet)? by Boone^ (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:39PM
    Re:Are there cheats (yet)? by windex (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:46PM
    Re:No kidding! by m1a1 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:42PM

    Like poking a savage dog with a stick (Score:3, Insightful)
    by plierhead on Thursday November 21, @07:03PM (#4727661)
    (User #570797 Info)
    Look out for MS's righteous rage when the forged MAC addresses start colliding with existing, non-hacker users and it disrupts the Live service they've paid for! Can anyone say "bolt the door, the wolf's outside" ?
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by meringuoid (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:20PM
    Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by rodgerd (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:30PM
    Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by SN74S181 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:14PM
    More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by Okian Warrior (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:29PM
    Re:More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by ceejayoz (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:59PM
    Re:More like shooting a beehive with a .22 by Istealmymusic (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:07PM
    Re:Like poking a savage dog with a stick by Guppy06 (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:06PM

    Write to the people at CapitalOne. (Score:-1, Troll)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:04PM (#4727663)
    These are the webmasters listed for CapitalOne's website; the people who decided to ban Mozilla from the site. If you're a Mozilla fan, let them know that you use it and you're unhappy with the decision. Threaten to take your banking business elsewhere.
    NAME: Burdge, Jonathan E-MAIL: jlb@io.com [mailto], jlbatdarc@w-link.net [mailto], elby@adequacy.org [mailto], darc@w-link.net [mailto] ALIASES: lb, jlb, Elby

    NAME: Casillas, Luis E-MAIL: casillas@stanford.edu [mailto], em@adequacy.org [mailto] ALIASES: em, Estanislao Martinez, Sylvain Tremblay

    NAME: Corrigan, Barry E-MAIL: barry@bjcorrigan.fsnet.co.uk [mailto], bc@adequacy.org [mailto] ALIASES: bc, ktb (Kiss the Blade), Lover's Arrival, Euroderf, Erbert Paget-Paget, Anya

    NAME: Dickson, Craig E-MAIL: crd@inversenet.com [mailto], mendaxveritas@yahoo.com [mailto], mendaxveritas@pacbell.net [mailto] ALIASES: mv, Mendax Veritas

    NAME: Flickinger, Dan E-MAIL: flikx@geekizoid.com [mailto], flikee@xmission.com [mailto] ALIASES: flikx

    NAME: Haberberger, George E-MAIL: ghaberbe@frontiernet.net [mailto], George.Haberberger@usa.xerox.com [mailto] ALIASES: GeorgeHa, Hairy_Potter

    NAME: Huston, Bill E-MAIL: bozoman@vlad.geekizoid.com [mailto], ALIASES: bozoman

    NAME: Johnson, Peter E-MAIL: peter.johnson@voicestream.com [mailto], shoeboy@adequacy.org [mailto] ALIASES: Shoeboy, Peter Johnson

    NAME: Lockwood, Scott E-MAIL: wsl3@attbi.com [mailto], vlad@geekizoid.com [mailto] ALIASES: Vladinator, Lonesome Cowboy Burt, Quick Star, Pinkerton Floyd, etc.

    NAME: Linwood, Rob E-MAIL: rcl@cs.csoft.net [mailto], rcl211@is9.nyu.edu [mailto] ALIASES: AuntFloyd, Con Troll

    NAME: Mann, Warren E-MAIL: broken@warmann.com [mailto] ALIASES: osm, OpenSourceMan

    NAME: McPherson, Craig E-MAIL: craig@laceyonline.com [mailto] ALIASES: craig, naked&petrified guy

    NAME: Nelson, Brian E-MAIL: elenchos@adequacy.org [mailto] ALIASES: Elenchos

    NAME: Osborne, Michaell E-MAIL: osborm@yahoo.com [mailto], dmg@adequacy.org [mailto], michaellosborne@netscapeonline.co.uk [mailto] ALIASES: dmg, Dumb Marketing Guy, Lord Hugh Toppingham

    NAME: Sassaman, Esther E-MAIL: esther@antioch.edu [mailto], perdida@adequacy.org [mailto], reva_altamira@yahoo.com [mailto] ALIASES: Perdida, Reva Altamira, etc.

    NAME: Skinner, James E-MAIL: spiralx@spazmail.com [mailto], spiralx@adequacy.org [mailto] ALIASES: SpiralX, Manifold, Jon Erikson

    NAME: Stanton, Matt E-MAIL: matt@madeforchina.com [mailto], serf@adequacy.org [mailto] ALIASES: Serf

    NAME: Zikowski, Zachary E-MAIL:

    Read the rest of this comment...

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Write to the people at CapitalOne. by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:19PM

    Breaking the licensing agreement (Score:4, Insightful)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:05PM (#4727679)
    You get a EULA that says that you can't access the online gaming forum with a modified X-Box. Then you go and circumvent that by putting a new serial number and MAC address on it, possibly depriving someone else down the line with the identical numbers of playing online.

    You broke the licensing agreement in the first place by modding the box. Why do you think it's right to break it further by circumventing the agreed-upon penalty?
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by kindbud (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:17PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:22PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Mononoke (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:26PM Re:Breaking the licensing agreement (Score:4, Funny)
    by ni5mo (nismoNO@SPAMlost.net.au) on Thursday November 21, @07:28PM (#4727881)
    (User #590178 Info)
    Why is the Vatican equipped with lightning rods?

    Because God isn't a catholic :)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by unicron (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:31PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:41PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @08:09PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:19PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:24PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:21PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:22PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:23PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:30PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Jagen (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:26PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:32PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by ceejayoz (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:02PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by svvampy (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:27PM
    Please see my other comment by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:35PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Bagheera (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:14PM
    Re:Breaking the licensing agreement by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @08:15PM

    It's unanimous (Score:2)
    by ekrout on Thursday November 21, @07:07PM (#4727697)
    (User #139379 Info | http://www.erickrout.com/)
    Everyone [savyon.com] hates [mit.edu] AOL CDs [kanorb.co.uk].

    Even dogs [nomoreaolcds.com].
    [ Reply to This ]

    Don't say you werent warned (Score:3, Funny)
    by dnoyeb on Thursday November 21, @07:07PM (#4727699)
    (User #547705 Info | http://www.rigidsoftware.com/)
    If you send your AOL CDs back to those guys, you get what you deserve...Them send right back to you.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Don't say you werent warned by Indras (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:13PM
    Re:Don't say you werent warned by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:34PM
    Re:Don't say you werent warned by Migelikor1 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:47PM
    Re:Don't say you werent warned by jcpii (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:00PM

    Further proof: (Score:2)
    by talks_to_birds on Thursday November 21, @07:08PM (#4727702)
    (User #2488 Info | http://www.finchhave...omputers/acspam.html)
    "...managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox ..."
    Any code devised by man can be broken by man.

    t_t_b

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Further proof: by slakdrgn (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:13PM
    Re:Further proof: by aiken_d (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:29PM

    what about the innocent? (Score:1)
    by reduced (reduced@gmx.DEBIANnet minus distro) on Thursday November 21, @07:08PM (#4727703)
    (User #589510 Info)
    i bet microsoft checks for dupes on the live network. some paying customer is probably locked out now.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:what about the innocent? by Moonshadow (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:11PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by jasonditz (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:25PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by Moonshadow (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:31PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by livitup (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:38PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by BJH (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:42PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by jasonditz (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:08PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by Sheetrock (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:11PM
    Re:what about the innocent? by DaveV1.0 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:12PM

    Why return CDs to AOL (Score:5, Insightful)
    by MeerCat on Thursday November 21, @07:08PM (#4727713)
    (User #5914 Info | http://www.schmerg.com/)
    The usual point of a petition is to demonstrate to people the mass rejection the public are showing their idea. Returning a million AOL CDs doesn't, IMHO, do this; it just tells AOL that their brand awareness campaign is working (and I dare say AOL know how many they have made).

    If you want it stopped, hit them where it hurts - put a return-to-sender sticker on them, make AOL pay for the postage, or handle them one-by-one, or see if you can use that German law about making retailers pay the cost of removing and disposing of excess packaging... I'm not a genius (I used to be, but I'm told I'm not any more) but surely we can come up with something more persuasive than a one-off dump of a large single load of CDs.

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by 1DarkZen (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:11PM
    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:21PM
    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:24PM
    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by LagDemon (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:32PM
    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by MeerCat (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:42PM
    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by David Walker (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:46PM
    Re:Why return CDs to AOL by jfreis (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:54PM

    At last (Score:1)
    by bryhhh on Thursday November 21, @07:09PM (#4727720)
    (User #317224 Info)
    woohoo!

    Now I can buy myself an Xbox on my CaptialOne card.
    [ Reply to This ]

    RE: Cryptonomicron (Score:2, Interesting)
    by usmcpanzer (usmcpanzer@hotma i l . c om) on Thursday November 21, @07:09PM (#4727721)
    (User #538447 Info | http://slashdot.org/)
    I just recently (a weeka ago?) purchased the book in the US, and the Quicksilver part is in the back. Can't say I've read it yet, tho.

    [ Reply to This ]

    IN SOVIET RUSSIA (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:10PM (#4727724)
    Slashdot is Slashback
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:41PM

    Changing serial numbers and macs... (Score:5, Insightful)
    by AtariDatacenter (jmccorm@@@yahoo...com) on Thursday November 21, @07:11PM (#4727735)
    (User #31657 Info | mailto:jmccorm@yahoo.com?Subject=SlashdotResponse)
    So they said they changed their serial number *and* MAC address to get back on. This is interesting and points back to something someone said in a previous thread. All you need to do is to make a program to burn through serial number space and get them marked invalid, and you've got a DoS of entertaining proportions.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by jandrese (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:49PM
    Re:Changing serial numbers and macs... by killmenow (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:10PM

    Actual use for AOL CD's (Score:5, Funny)
    by coryboehne on Thursday November 21, @07:11PM (#4727737)
    (User #244614 Info)
    The other evening (without an internet connection) I was trying to install the .Net framework (dotnetfx.exe) on my laptop and since I had installed windows 98 the version of Internet Explorer was 5.00.x but due to the dependencies of the .Net framework I needed to have 5.01 or later.

    As an aside, when you don't have 5.01 or later it just kills the browser that you do have installed, so it kinda causes a really fun catch-22, no browser to surf the web to find a new browser..... Really sucked.

    Anyway, back with my story.... I was on a frantic search for a copy of IE 5.01 or later when I remembered that I had a stockpile of those AOL Cd's in the garage... I grabbed myself one of them (yellow, no idea what version) and proceeded to find the IE directory on the disc.. Sure enough it was version 5.01.x so I installed it and everything went smoothly from there.

    So, the moral of the story? Sometimes AOL disks do have a use other than coasters or frisbees....
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by peacefinder (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:28PM
    Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by coryboehne (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:33PM
    Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by David Walker (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:59PM
    Re:Actual use for AOL CD's by suricatta (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:04PM

    AOL CD's are awsome... (Score:5, Funny)
    by BSOD from above on Thursday November 21, @07:12PM (#4727743)
    (User #625268 Info)
    when you cook them in the microwave for 15 seconds. Just don't try this with anything you care about.
    [ Reply to This ]

    I agree with this post by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:15PM
    Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by cscx (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:31PM
    Re:AOL CD's are awsome... by F2F (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:59PM

    xbox serial number (Score:5, Interesting)
    by FeatherBoa on Thursday November 21, @07:14PM (#4727761)
    (User #469218 Info)
    Team Assembly managed to change the serial number and MAC address of the xbox. After the change they managed to get onto Xbox Live (with mod-chip disabled) with a previously banned xbox

    Not only that, you can arrange for any arbitrary XBox to be permanently banned!
    I wonder if there's a way to pollute their blacklist with so many bogus entries that they have to give up.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:20PM
    Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:49PM
    Re:xbox serial number by pythas (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:00PM
    Re:xbox serial number by donutz (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @07:37PM
    Re:xbox serial number by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @07:54PM
    Re:xbox serial number by killmenow (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:07PM
    Re:xbox serial number by m1a1 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @07:47PM
    Re:xbox serial number by ceejayoz (Score:3) Thursday November 21, @08:05PM
    Re:xbox serial number by shogun (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @08:14PM

    So NVIDIA is not kicking ATIs butt... (Score:2)
    by dnoyeb on Thursday November 21, @07:15PM (#4727774)
    (User #547705 Info | http://www.rigidsoftware.com/)
    Remember ATI is the 500lb Gorilla here, not NVIDIA. ATI just woke up in time to see NVIDIA trying to sneak in on its graphics card market and put the smacketh down, respectfully.

    Lets see NVIDIA wake up and charge a little less that the 1/2 a grand they seem to think their metal is worth...
    [ Reply to This ]

    One word: drivers. by pigeon768 (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:43PM
    Re:One word: drivers. by ivan256 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:05PM

    AOL CD's (Score:1)
    by obiedxss on Thursday November 21, @07:17PM (#4727784)
    (User #241764 Info | http://www.nuklearpower.com/index.php)
    I also hate AOL and I wish to collect AOL installation disks. I have 768 so far, and I want to reach 1,000,001.

    Send contributions to SmarterChild@aol.com

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:AOL CD's by Anonymous Coward Thursday November 21, @08:12PM

    Late Show with David Letterman website (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:17PM (#4727788)
    Anyone notice how Letterman's website [cbs.com] won't play RealVideo clips from Mozilla? Try clicking on "Big Show Highlight" under the DaveTV section (requires JavaScript).
    The interesting thing is that if you use the Preferences Toolbar (download here [xulplanet.com]) to change the user-agent string to, say, NS 6.2 Lin or IE 6.0 WinXP, it works just fine.

    -CF

    [ Reply to This ]

    AOLandfill Halloween Costume (Score:5, Funny)
    by Aexia on Thursday November 21, @07:18PM (#4727790)
    (User #517457 Info)
    The Saturday night before Halloween I had a costume party to go to. I remembered this Saturday morning. Or rather, Saturday afternoon since that's when I actually woke up. I had no costume.

    But I did have a bunch of crap CDs, some of which were AOL CDs. So I taped them together and went as AOLandfill. Had about strips of 6-7 down each a leg, a sort of vest and a couple on my forearms. Truth be told, it did look like some low-rent Power Ranger battle armour or something, but once I said the name, people thought it was funny.

    I also got to use pickup lines like
    Try me free for 1000 hours for your first month!
    I'm so easy to use it's no wonder I'm number one!

    The terrifying part of the costume may have been how well those lines worked.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh (Score:1)
    by SiliconJesus101 on Thursday November 21, @07:21PM (#4727824)
    (User #622291 Info)
    Wow!! What a nice gesture!! You don't like my product so you won't be using it....then you are kind enough to return my promotional and advertisement materials to me free of charge so I can avoid the costs of having 1 Million more CD's made. Very nice guy!!! Saving AOL what must be several hundreds of thousands of dollars in CD pressing and printing fees has to be the nicest gesture I've ever heard of :-)
    "If they reach their goal ... I'd be happy to give them directions and greet them at the door ... We would make a contribution ourselves to put them over the top" - Yes...I'm sure he would. This guy will obviously get a nice bonus check for all the money he saved his company.

    [ Reply to This ]

    Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by pheared (Score:2) Thursday November 21, @07:42PM
    Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....Uhhhh by SiliconJesus101 (Score:1) Thursday November 21, @08:01PM

    Trolling on Slashdot Japan? (Score:0, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:23PM (#4727834)
    Has anyone given it a good go?
    I've seen a goatse link or two.

    [ Reply to This ]

    AOL CDs in the Post Office (Score:1, Funny)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:23PM (#4727838)
    anyone else seens those displays of aol disks being given away in the P.O.?
    Take a few every time you visit....aol will think idiots are signing up and restock them, and if you keep the dispensers empty, you'll being doing a public service by sparing some n00b from the awful aol experience while attriting aol's resources

    [ Reply to This ]

    Happy birthday who? (Score:1)
    by aster_ken on Thursday November 21, @07:25PM (#4727853)
    (User #516808 Info | http://www.campuscomp.com/)
    Who is fkp, and why are we wishing this person a happy birthday?
    [ Reply to This ]

    AOL cd's how many do you have (Score:1)
    by headbulb on Thursday November 21, @07:26PM (#4727866)
    (User #534102 Info)
    I have over 5000 I figure take a few box's, save a few souls.
    [ Reply to This ]

    Capitalone has worked with Moz. for a long time. (Score:1)
    by dameron on Thursday November 21, @07:29PM (#4727888)
    (User #307970 Info)
    I've been happily paying my online account via Mozilla (on Redhat 7.2, then 7.3)for at least five months now.

    I used to use Opera disguised as IE, but for the past five months (since mid-June when I got a new laptop) I've been using Opera sans javascript, so I know I wasn't dreaming when I paid all those charges...

    I hope.

    -dameron
    [ Reply to This ]

    Nvidia not news ?!?! (Score:2, Troll)
    by Archfeld (archfeld@snotmail.com) on Thursday November 21, @07:29PM (#4727889)
    (User #6757 Info | http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 01, @01:53PM)
    Yeah, the same features implemented under ATI are documented but guess what...They will WORK for Nvidia, and they DON'T NOW for ATI.....

    ATI support is about the worst I've ever had the misfortune to need to deal with. The actually make M$ support look forthcoming and really eager to please. 4 rev's of ATI's so called catalyst drivers and things are actually sort of stable, but a slew of games won't run under the 9700pro, for example M$ CFS3 does not recognize the driver set up. If you are thinking about buying a video card I suggest as someone who has a Radeon 9700pro and a nvidia 460, I'd get a cheap GF3 or 4200 and wait and see the NV30. Unless you have money to just burn, ATI has dissapointed again, and they've not corrected any of this All in One Wonder driver issues either....
    [ Reply to This ]

    For shame. (Score:1, Insightful)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:31PM (#4727909)
    Welcome to slashdot. Where personal liberties are above everything else. Mine, that is. Fuck your liberties. I will (possibly) steal your xbox serial number and get it banned because I'm an idiot and forgot to turn of my modchip while trying to connect to xbox live. Now, you will suffer. Of course, MY liberties are all that matters. So go fuck yourself.

    Sincerely,
    A Typical Slashdotter
    [ Reply to This ]

    capital one (Score:3, Interesting)
    by Jucius Maximus (j13moh@netscape.net) on Thursday November 21, @07:35PM (#4727936)
    (User #229128 Info | http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Monday August 26, @01:49PM)
    "It seems CapitalOne's website works with Mozilla, as of this November, 2002. This is good news because many people have CapitalOne credit cards, and previously the site required Microsoft's Intarweb Explorer. This just shows how simply speaking up by e-mailing large companies can evoke change."
    Excellent. Now keep speaking up and make sure they know that you are pleased to be able to continue giving them your business because they respect your personal choices.

    My bank in canada always had a Mozilla friendly site and I made sure I sent them a nice e-mail thanking them ,describing exactly why I prefer to use their services as opposed to my previous bank.

    Positive feedback is just as important as negative feedback!

    [ Reply to This ]

    Never do anything.. (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 21, @07:43PM (#4727986)
    Nice of Capitalone to fix their IE only policy just two weeks after I replace them with a company whose site I can actually use. Or maybe I actually caused them to change. Yeah that's it, it was all me. ... just in time to get monitored by the pentagon.

    [ Reply to This ]

    Neal Stephenson needs to get laid (Score:1)
    by TheHumbone (summvogel@nospam.hotmail.com) on Thursday November 21, @07:50PM (#4728034)
    (User #123110 Info)
    Does our hero's love interest still have an Adam's Apple in the new edition?
    [ Reply to This ]

    Confused.... (Score:2)
    by wilburdg on Thursday November 21, @07:51PM (#4728040)
    (User #178573 Info)
    Weird. A link in the story description to a reply to that same story...

    Hmmm... But... but.... *head explodes*

    Slashdot: Successfully colapsing the known universe since...
    [ Reply to This ]

    What I'd rather see... (Score:1)
    by Bytal on Thursday November 21, @07:52PM (#4728046)
    (User #594494 Info)
    is a good HOW-TO on getting those nifty AOL tin cases. I'd receive ten thousand AOL cds a day if only they sent them in tins...on second thought they can keep the cds :)
    [ Reply to This ]

    xbox - roll your own network? (Score:1)
    by feepcreature on Thursday November 21, @07:52PM (#4728047)
    (User #623518 Info)
    If you buy an XBox, you can do what you like with it - that's your right. By the same token, MS don't have to let you use it on their network.
    Of course, even if they have been banned, suitably hacked XBoxen could presumably use local networks or maybe even the internet (for games with weak timing requirements). LAN party anyone?

    P.

    [ Reply to This ]

    Quicksilver (Score

    1. Re:Happy Shithead! :) 3 by Brent_DS · · Score: 1

      Are you a moron, or is this a slashcode bug???

  57. Whoa, spooky by deepstephen · · Score: 1

    Not five minutes ago, I saw an AOL advert on TV in which a man phones up AOL and says "Hello, can you send me a free trial CD?"

    At this point he picks up his mug from the desk and off the bottom of it falls an AOL CD which he's been using as a coaster.

    Oh my God. The irony is too much. :-)

    --

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (you come and go)
  58. Not Black-and-White by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    Just because Jonny Doe was given a PC so he can use it for school doesn't mean he's not going to use it for games.

    Really, it's not black-and-white. What about the people who got an X-Box for the online games, then learned about modchips and running Linux? What about the people who got an X-Box to serve as a PVR, and decided that playing online games was also Cool?

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Not Black-and-White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear mmol:

      You are not properly asserting your arrogance. Instead of "Jonny Doe," please instead refer to people as "Joe Sixpack" or "Joey Sixpack."

      Sincerely,
      Slashdot

    2. Re:Not Black-and-White by Babbster · · Score: 2
      Really, it's not black-and-white. What about the people who got an X-Box for the online games, then learned about modchips and running Linux? What about the people who got an X-Box to serve as a PVR, and decided that playing online games was also Cool?

      This would be a great point IF there hadn't already been discussion - both by the public and by Microsoft - indicating that modded Xboxes could be banned from the Live service. This seems to be a "let the modder beware" situation. They can still use Gamespy Tunnel with their modded Xboxes OR disable the mod chip before going online with Xbox Live for the first time.

  59. Slashdot Is A Shithole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Taco, Fuck Neal, Fuck Roblimo, Fuck Hemos... in the ass.

  60. Still Good by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Even if there is an infinite number of combinations, this is a valid strategy. The reason is the banned clients dont have to store any state, but the server does. So after some ungodly number of combinations are banned the server will fail from having to store such a large database of banned clients.


    To make the method most effective, its best to make sure the serial numbers/MAC are well spread through the valid number space.

    1. Re:Still Good by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      If they used some sort of balanced tree algorithm, it could scale to many GBs before failing. Of course, this is MS we are talking about here, it's probably a bubble sorted list that gets resorted on each update.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  61. Can we say Anandtech? by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

    Anandtech had all the same info as tech-report when the news hit. There's nothing new or earth shattering being reported at tech-report that anyone who has read Anandtech doesn't already know. Well, except for the fact that tech-report failed to mention that the memory on the GFFX runs at 500 MHz, which is why it needs a huge fan to cool it. The only thing they mention is that "the memory runs faster".

    Sure, they talk down wider memory paths now, but will they say the same when ATI has a newer card out that uses the same technology?

  62. The whole "web standards" debate is stupid by Skapare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole "web standards" debate is stupid, and most especially one sided sites like Zeldman's webstandards.org. All that Zeldman and his cronies are doing is try to push new standards ahead of sane development, probably just so that he won't have to deal with standards like HTML. He has a point, though, as the older standards are lame and the newer standards are better. But he lacks the ability to understand that browser development and deployment will always lag behind, and why. The sad thing is that his kind of suckered lots of web developers into believing that all they have to do is blame the user for having an old browser and all will become better because all users will upgrade. Truth is, that's not always possible or feasible.

    A tour of web sites using the Zeldman style with an older browser will generally work, as he does not advocate breaking them. But what you do get is less than what that browser is capable of. For example, browsers have for ages supported setting a background color or even a background image in HTML. Zeldmanistas refuse to set the background color, or in some cases, intentionally set it to something different than what is set in CSS. So while the site looks fine with CSS, without CSS you get maybe stark gray, or worse, black with black text over it. So what's actually going on here is not a case of these developers adhering to web standards, but rather, they are picking and choosing the standards they want to use, such as by not making use of HTML completely and correctly. So why should he any right to expect that others will choose to use newer standards like CSS or XML or whatever.

    There is also a very good reason to make a web site that works with older browsers. Many groups are now operating in lower income urban areas carrying out programs to get older computers donated to them from businesses that are doing the upgrading. Because of the economy, the number of businesses doing upgrades has dropped off and most donations are rather old. What this means is that most of the people receiving these computers are getting something in the late 486 or early Pentium range, and at best a copy of Windows 95, which is usually all (other than BSD or Linux, which hasn't made it to these programs that I've seen yet ... something for us to get more involved in I suppose) that these old machines with slow CPU, small memory, and limited hard drive capacity can handle. So they end up with usually an old Netscape version 3 browser (Java and Javascript are hopelessly broken, and CSS is non-existant). Newer browsers overwhelm the machine, if they even fit at all.

    This "economic accessibility" isn't yet addressed by law, and may never be. Private business does not have to cater to them. So the banks and other financial institutions listed with specific browser requirements aren't in violation. And besides, we're talking about people who can't afford a computer and have to use limited time community access ISPs just to get online (if the phone and electric bill are paid up). I'm sure the financial institutions have no interest in extending them credit.

    While businesses probably should have a free choice in what, and who, they support, governments OTOH should not. People should have a right to expect their government internet based services to be accessible to all, not just those who can afford a bigger faster computer that can handle the latest obese and overloaded software. And since it is possible to make web sites that not only work well with new standards, but also work well (as well as those standards allow) with older standards that the smaller browsers support, governments should be required to do this in all citizen-facing web sites. In other words, if it can be made to work in a minimal set of standards, it must be made to work that well when that's what's available. Then if it works even better in newer standards in ways that the older standards could never do, that's fine, too.

    What I think might be a better approach to this would be to support the development of a not-so-obese web browser, as well as programs to get systems like Linux deployed onto more of the computers being donated to the economically disadvantaged (aside: why are politically correct words so long?).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:The whole "web standards" debate is stupid by GuruJ · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Properly designed HTML+CSS has no color information encoded into it at all. In older browsers that don't support CSS, you should end up with black text on white.

      The challenge is to convince web designers to separate form from content properly. Done right, websites designed for Mozilla or IE are just as useable on Lynx or Netscape 3.

      Yes, you will lose the 'prettiness' of the webpage. But an older computer shouldn't be running complicated graphical effects anyway, IMHO. The important thing is that all Web users can access the information on the site.

      --
      -- Askari: Give JavaScript the bird.
    2. Re:The whole "web standards" debate is stupid by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So while the site looks fine with CSS, without CSS you get maybe stark gray...

      Very few web sits voluntarily chose a grey background. In fact, that glorious grey is the browser's default background color. If fact, if you visit webstandards.org without CSS support, you're getting the colors, fonts, and layout you asked for. Don't like it, take a trip to Edit > Preferences > Appearance > Colors. Click the button for "Background" and change it to something you like. See, control in your hands.

      So what's actually going on here is not a case of these developers adhering to web standards, but rather, they are picking and choosing the standards they want to use, such as by not making use of HTML completely and correctly.

      Actually, they're making use of the latest version of HTML completely and correctly. Using the various color tags and techniques from previous versions would in fact be violating the correct use of HTML. When you break standards you end up having to do dozens of special cases for the quirks of each browser. If you stick to baseline modern HTML with CSS, all modern browsers will display the same thing looking good, older browsers will degrade gracefully.

      You argue that by not supporting out of date HTML you're somehow discriminating against people with older computers. That's a bizarre claim. By using out of date HTML, you're making it harder for anyone to use it. Modern HTML makes it easier to render a web page in lynx, or on your WebTV, or on a braille display, or be read aloud by a text to speech program. CSS makes it easier to keep your HTML small, speeding up the browsing experience for people with lower quality phone lines or working over an expensive wireless link. Modern HTML degrades gracefully. The old hackery HTML turns into a mess when forced to degrade. The webstandards.org page you complain about may not look pretty, but it's sure as hell usable. It'll work fine under lynx and a text to speech reader will easily and accurate speak the page for a blind person. As someone who occasionally must fall back on extremely low end systems and extremely slow connections, I appreciate how well webstandards.org degrade and curse how poorly most "old HTML" sites do.

      Zeldmanistas...intentionally set it to something different than what is set in CSS. ... So while the site looks fine with CSS, without CSS you get ... black with black text over it.

      Actually, anyone playing this sort of game is most certainly not a believer in Web Standards. Setting the background color at all in HTML (instead of CSS) is not invalid by the standard. No, those people are just assholes.

    3. Re:The whole "web standards" debate is stupid by Skapare · · Score: 2

      In order to make the web site do on an older browser such as Netscape 3 all that could be done on Netscape 3, then color information must be coded in the HTML part. Web sites should not be designed for Mozilla or IE. They should be designed to work in general, and it should come out reasonably well on all browsers still in general use ... if it is your intention to do so. You have the choice and right not to. But don't claim that you are making your site compatible with Netscape 3 if you exclude Netscape 3 users from the color information Netscape 3 is certainly capable of correctly handling. Information can be in the color, too. And some sites are even worse. They do put HTML color info in, different than the CSS color, and (possibly intentionally) the HTML color is the same as the text color (or maybe 1 value step off) making it impossible to read the information. One example of this is in the menu on the left of http://www.state.tx.us/. The text color is #5a61a9 while the background color is #5b61a9. The link text color is set with this HTML:

      <body vlink="#B17070" link="#5B61A9" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0">
      while the menu background color is set with this HTML:
      <table bgcolor="#5A61A9" width="172" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" border="0">
      which clearly shows to me they explicitly intended to make the links hard to read on non-CSS systems. You can see what it looks like in Netscape 4.77 in PNG or (for those using Netscape 3 right now) JPEG format. Older browsers and older computers do handle these colors just fine, so there's no reason not to do it, unless you just want those users to have to deal with the lack of quality presentation. For you, I think that should be your choice. For the State of Texas, they should not be trying to obscure things, and should be trying to make things accessible to everyone.

      BTW, when I contacted officials at the state office dealing with these issues, two months ago, their response was "we're working on it". BS! Just edit the HTML and change the color code.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:The whole "web standards" debate is stupid by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Letting older browsers degrade is the problem here. That is what should not be done. Web pages should not degrade. Instead, they should do as good as they always could do in that browser. I'm not saying you should avoid modern HTML. I'm saying you should not do the degrading thing to be in effect biased against people with smaller browsers.

      Given that CSS is NOT yet well deployed, the use of HTML at the level which says that compatibility is to be avoided (setting background color is still a compatible feature) is an intentional form of degrading, not something compelled by a standard.

      I'm all for standards. But I absolutely insist they be competently and completely implemented and deployed before moving off the old ones. And I'm certainly for shaking off the old ones as soon as possible when the new ones are fully usable. That doesn't mean you can't use the new ones now. What it means is the old ones are still just as much in effect until the new ones have taken their place. It has not happened yet. And people like Zeldman don't even try to improve the situation by supporting efforts to do such development.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  63. CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I have news for you.

    ATI's CATALYST 2.3 and 2.4 drivers will work on every ATI Radeon chipset from the R100 all the way to the R300 used on the ATI Radeon 9700 Pro board. This is pretty much a de facto "unified" driver in my view.

    Besides, there is no such thing as a stable driver. I've read on the alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia newsgroup that many high-end games still have trouble with the latest nVidia Detonator 40.72 driver (shrug).

    At least ATI is getting their act together with the latest CATALYST drivers.

    1. Re:CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they are "unified"(*) does not make them good. Man oh man do ATI's drivers suck ass. From my experience they have been incompatible, all sorts of OpenGL problems, crashing, etc.

      * (they are not really unified since it installes a different driver after the installation proggy determines what card you have)

    2. Re:CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because 40.72 is a beta driver. Beta drivers don't claim to be stable. However, ATI's drivers have been absurdly unstable in the past (I had a friend that had to format his hard drive three times before he called ATI support and they said "oh, yeah, don't install the drivers on the cd, it'll crash your computer"). I've heard that some of the newer ATI drivers are somewhat decent (I heard that they fired almost their entire driver staff. Not sure whether to beleive that or not.) But the nVidia drivers have always been better. Besides, nVidia has nice linux drivers :-p

    3. Re:CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nvidia detonator 23.11 == stable as hell. always revert back to this version if a current version is screwing you.

      Plus, you mention the detonator 40 series as bad...well of course it is, its a beta!!!! the 30 series drivers are still the official WHQL certified ones, and the ones that work.

    4. Re:CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by pigeon768 · · Score: 1
      I've read on the alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia newsgroup that many high-end games still have trouble with the latest nVidia Detonator 40.72 driver (shrug).

      Those are beta, fyi. Latest stable drivers are 30.something iirc.

      But yeah, it's good to see ATI making steps in the right direction.

    5. Re:CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by Quikah · · Score: 2

      40.72 are release drivers which are WHQL certified.

      --
      Q.
    6. Re:CATALYST drivers are unified drivers! by pigeon768 · · Score: 1

      Ah. I haven't checked in 2 weeks, it's changed since then.

  64. Not too hard... by sgtsanity · · Score: 1
    2. Just how big IS that serial number space. Something tells me it's of BIGNUM proportions and it's the kind of thing that you woudn't be able to burn through in your lifetime.

    Not if you had a Beowulf cluster of Xboxes!

    Oh, wait....

  65. Yes, I am a bit by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    cynical about ATI at the moment so it tends to skew my perspective. I'd hardly consider this one "long time dream of software developers" likely to toppple the video card industry. Even if ATI hardware supports every single bloody DX9 feature, if their LOUSY drivers won't run it is a glorified heater. Here's to ATI getting their shit together and driving Nvidia and the market to really put out some high class video cards.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  66. Doom III is CPU limited by magnum3065 · · Score: 1

    Ok, as I'm sure was mentioned when the Doom III demo came out, it is not slowed down by the video card, so any comparison of video cards based on Doom III is completely irrelevant. I ran the Doom III demo on my GeForce4 4600, and my friend got about the same performance on his GeForce DDR. The leaked version of Doom III is very CPU intensive, most likely because it was compiled without optimizations, kind of like the leaked versions of UT2003. Therefore since the CPU is the bottleneck, using a faster card will not have a noticeable effect on the speed. We need to wait until a version of Doom III intended for public use is available to make any judgements of hardware based upon its performance.

  67. To hell with the Xbox serial/MAC addy hackers by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They decided to mod their Xbox, now they are upset that breaking the EULA makes their box incompatible with Xbox Live.

    BooHoo.

    If I were to somehow get OS X running on an AMD chip and iTools no longer worked, the last thing I would do would be to cry to Apple.

    Xbox Live is a little oasis of online gaming where cheating, drastic connection differences and hardware differences are currently nonexistant. It is EXACTLY what legit Counterstrike players have been begging for since the late '90s. Now, a bunch of assholes out to get around their own inability to deal with the consequences their actions have bestowed upon them, are out to ruin it for everyone else.

    XBL is something we've all wanted for years. Now, we can likely expect to see legit users permabanned from XBL because some 1337 hAx0r cannot possibly deal with the fact he can only get ahead in online Xbox games by using ......SKILL!!!!!

    So he uses their serial/MAC.

    Others do the same.

    They also cheat.

    XBL is ruined.

    I know a lot of people think it is cool to fuck over Microsoft at every oppertunity and feel that they should give up on the banning, but if this were anyone else, there would be a lot more outrage than there is now. Something good is on the verge of being destroyed. Too bad no one wants to own up to their own hypocrisy.

    1. Re:To hell with the Xbox serial/MAC addy hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So these people proved that it was possible and published their findings.

      And you are upset?

      It's better that the white hacker's cry foul, then the black hackers silently exploit.

      How would you like to be locked out of XBL because someone faked your serial and MAC and got banned for swearing, etc. You would have little recourse with Microsoft. But now that it is known that serial and MAC numbers can be changed, you have a much better chance of having your box unbanned.

      This is not a new problem. This has been happening with WON ids pretty much since Half-life was released.

    2. Re:To hell with the Xbox serial/MAC addy hackers by Have+Blue · · Score: 2
      XBL is ruined.
      Remember that lamers can also be banned by XBL account, which is independent of IP and MAC. And they probably won't figure out how to spoof THAT anytime soon.
    3. Re:To hell with the Xbox serial/MAC addy hackers by 3Bees · · Score: 1
      Now, a bunch of assholes out to get around their own inability to deal with the consequences their actions have bestowed upon them, are out to ruin it for everyone else.

      Hmmmm....it seems to me that they are doing precisely what you are accusing them of not doing, dealing with the consequences of their actions. The consequences where banishment, and these chaps dealt with it. You don't like it. In your eloquent words: BooHoo..

      Too bad no one wants to own up to their own hypocrisy

      Ahhhh, somebody found an opportunity to stand on a soap-box! Good for you! Too bad that there is nothing of hypocrisy in what these guys did. In fact, it seems that their actions demonstrate a high degree of consistency...hacking a box to take modifications past all the security built in, hacking the box to get past the security built into the servers...please show me the hypocrisy, because I don't see it...

      --
      "I think we should tax people who stand in water! " - Mr. Gumby
  68. No download link for Mozilla.org in the FAQ by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    Online: Technical support

    Q: What should I do if I get the following message: ''The Internet site you are trying to view uses a security certificate that was signed by an unknown authority''?

    A: This message indicates that you must upgrade your browser. To protect the privacy of your personal information, we require your Internet browser supports 128-bit encryption to access our Online Account Services (OAS).

    We suggest you download Netscape version 4.08 or higher or Internet Explorer version 4.0 or higher. For Macintosh users, we suggest Internet Explorer version 4.5 or higher.

    Netscape: Click the link below to download Netscape Navigator or Netscape Communicator:
    http://home.netscape.com/computing/ download/

    Internet Explorer (PC): Click the link below to download the latest browser version:
    http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/

    Internet Explorer (Macintosh): Click the link below to download the latest browser version:
    http://www.microsoft.com/mac/download/

    1. Re:No download link for Mozilla.org in the FAQ by BZ · · Score: 2

      Quite correct. Mozilla.org does not provide end-user support; imo anyone who has issues understanding what the above SSL warning means would have issues using Mozilla in general. (Without support from some entity like their OS distributor, of course.)

    2. Re:No download link for Mozilla.org in the FAQ by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

      yeah, but, getting end users involved is what makes open source, open source. many shallow eye bugs or something.

      Somebody needs to setup Mozilla End user support and figure out how to make money from it....Netscape's support isn't free.

  69. MAC address validity? by xlsior · · Score: 1

    Unless Microsoft 'forgot' to keep track of the MAC addresses of previously released machines, I bet it will be only a matter of time for them to simply compare the MAC address of a connecting xbox against a database of 'valid' MAC addresses...
    (Much like the Battle.net server checking the validity of CD-keys, for Warcraft, Starcraft, etc.)

  70. Re:Other Sites by officeboy · · Score: 1

    I"ve never had problems with CC sites I visit (i use opera) But one place that really pisses me off is costco.com I've emailed then 2-3 times and i never hear anything back except for "Thanks for your suggestions, I'll forward them on to..."

  71. GeForceFX preview mistakes by scotay · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems the GeforceFx previews made some mistakes when comparing the relative merits of the NV30 and 9700.

    For a good read check out this comparison of the new chips. Even this gets a few things wrong

    The vertex shader 1024 instructions limit of the 9700 is mostly misreported.

    The Geforce vertex shader is more powerful, supporting dynamic branching, but the 9700 can do a static branching per primitive with instruction lengths of 65,026. I'm sure such shaders will be equally unwieldy for gaming on both cards.

    It seems some of the reviewers only looked only at what NVidia told them and what DX9 exposes and not what the 9700's actual silicon supports.

    The reviewers barely understand the full capabilities of the 9700 months after its release. I'm sure the FX will provide similar surprises (good and bad) when they actually get their hands on one.

  72. Xbox MAC address spoofing by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just a snippet of info for those that don't know. Spoofing the MAC address of an Xbox is trivial, since as soon as the Xbox Live software is installed, an option is available for manually inputting a new MAC address. Right now I am spoofing my laptop NIC MAC so that I don't need to restart my cable modem every time I go online with the Xbox.

  73. owning hardware? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

    Tell that to RCN who charges me $5 a month for my cable modem. I wonder if MS would attach a EULA to the xbox and consider the purchase fee a one time hardware "licensing fee". maybe I shouldn't give people ideas...

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:owning hardware? by digidave · · Score: 2

      You are renting your cable modem. If you went out and paid $200 (or however much they are) for one and are still being charged this $5 then you have a legitimate complaint.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  74. AOL CD-RW by selan · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember when AOL used to send out floppy disks? I got through my last few years of college without having to buy floppies, because I got them free from AOL. Now those were useful.

  75. BIGNUM proportions.... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

    Are you trying to say that they send a variable number of bits for the serial number and that it is not simply a fixed-width field (32 bit, 64 bit, 128 bit, etc)? And that you think that is likely? It is far more likely that they use a fixed width number. So maybe it's 2**128 combinations, but it's not even close to infinite.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:BIGNUM proportions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So maybe it's 2**128 combinations, but it's not even close to infinite.

      So, what number is close to finite? 2**256? 2**1024? Inquiring minds want to know.

    2. Re:BIGNUM proportions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doh!
      s/finite/infinite

  76. RE: Xbox live hacking by MaverickUW · · Score: 1

    With all this talk about hacking so you can disable x-boxes from the XBL system, if M$ notices a lot coming from the same IP address, why can't they just invalidate the XBL account number (granted, I don't know if they even keep track of account numbers yet)... make people have to pay for the service again....

    Though that would be funny to see a script that gives MS your credit card number for a new account, change the MAC and serial, and repeat. MS certainly wouldn't mind whatsoever.

  77. AOL CD tangent by Pretzalzz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just heard on Car Talk that they decided to send 3.1 yogurt lids to AOL. Essentially, they were going to run a promotional campaign for some cause by printing a message on yogurt lids. The problem was that they put NPR on the lids(since they air on NPR) without clearing it with NPR. When NPR found out they said that the lids couldn't be distributed because NPR didn't want to be seen associated with a commercial product. So Click and Clack were stuck with 3.1 million lids that they didn't have anything to with. They had a contest to come up with the best use for them and the winning entry was "Send them to AOL and see how they feel".

  78. Re:Other Sites by baglunch · · Score: 1

    ...you mean .CA, right?

    --

    Work is for people who lack the imagination to play.

  79. Pnc Bank by jchawk · · Score: 2

    Pncbank has support mozilla for a while now, after reading the quickie about captial one, I sent them a nice email.

    "I just wanted to write you guys to say thank you for supporting the Mozilla web browser. I appricate a company that recognizes and encourages my right to choose a different web browser other then Internet Explorer.

    Keep up the good work, and please continue to support our right to choose. As long as you continue doing what you are doing I will continue to be your customer!

    You guys are awesome."

    Maybe if anyone else uses Pncbank you can send them an email too.

  80. NV30's fan from hell by Animats · · Score: 2

    I just can't see a card that takes two slots and has that huge fan going mainstream. That's just too much.

    1. Re:NV30's fan from hell by TheScienceKid · · Score: 1

      it may suck more than a Kirby vacuum cleaner and though I dont know about your pc, mine has a AMR (Audio Modem Riser) slot above my AGP slot which I wont use in a month of sundays, so I couldn't care less if that slot is used up.

  81. I save 'em all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I empty out the Free Take One bins in Sears, and have my friends and relatives save theirs for me. Why? The stuff bringing the big bucks on eBay today is the shit everybody threw out 20 years ago. Those hated AOL CDROMs are going to sell for hundreds of dollars in new, unopened condition in the 2020s. You'll see. I'll be richer than Bill Gates.

  82. Hang on a minute by Maquis196 · · Score: 0

    Ive been a capital one credit card (wow 4 c's) holder for over a year now,ive had no problems with using the website with mozilla,galean,konquerer,the whole works. I am talking about the Uk site though (www.capitalone.co.uk)

    Maquis196

  83. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  84. Re: One small step for BanKind. by Brent_DS · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah.... Now that you mention it, it did come up in Phoenix when I went there tonight to pay my bill, whereas I usually have to shout an obsenity or two and then open up IE. I didn't even notice this one... Silly me!

  85. Re:Other Sites by officeboy · · Score: 1

    I mean what I say. CC, like Credit Card.

  86. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. AOLandfill by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

    In my opinion, sending all the CDs to two guys and counting on them to ship a million is kind of stupid. Instead, whenever you receive an AOL CD, use a hammer and a nail to place a few holes in recorded portions of the data track, such that the CD becomes useless. Write profanity on it with permanent ink. Then, mail it back to AOL. The advantages of this method are:

    1. This method is similar to a DDoS attack. Packets (in this case, CDs) arriving from every source are unstoppable. Packets arriving from one source (two guys with a million CDs) can be
      • blocked (through some legal procedure that some jerk-off lawyer will conjure up)
      • or used to AOL's advantage (the shipment of a million CDs arrive and AOL simply reships them or something)
      • Thrown away (AOL will receive a truckload of CDs and simply send the truck to the landfill).
    2. This method promises that AOL cannot use the arriving CDs to their advantage. They are destroyed, and thus cannot be reused in any way. Speaking of which, since you received them in the mail, they are YOUR property, and you may therefore do with them whatever you wish. You are therefore allowed to destroy them.
    3. If carried out by enough people, this method will inconvenience AOL...
      • It might let them know how we feel about their environmental damage.
      • If they receive 1000 copies a day, or even 100, that WILL waste someone's time who is receiving packages.
      • Besides, it's kind of like Chinese water torture... CDs will arrive at a steady, unstopping flow.
    4. The involvement of many individuals might convince AOL that they're doing the wrong thing.

    You know all those junk mailers you receive that offer you junk you don't need? Many of them come with postage-paid envelopes. Simply rip up the materials they sent you, stick them in the postage-paid envelope, and send them back. They will have to pay postage, and it will waste their time. If enough people do this, it may cause a reduction in junk mail.

  89. If it's so easy, by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    I'd like to see you do it.

    I know that on my end, all my machines have very strict rules about packets and IPs, as well as verification of them (as well as syn cookies).

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:If it's so easy, by swillden · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see you do it.

      And how would you know if I did? In fact, I've done it many times. My ISP, like most, doesn't do any source filtering, not even of RFC 1918 addresses. Forging my source address is as simple as turning off SNAT on my router. Choosing a different forged address, or using many of them, is slightly more complex, and may require creating custom-formatted IP packets, but it's hardly a challenge to a reasonably competent programmer.

      I know that on my end, all my machines have very strict rules about packets and IPs, as well as verification of them (as well as syn cookies).

      And I suppose you're the sysadmin for a large ISP?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:If it's so easy, by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      "Forging my source address is as simple as turning off SNAT on my router. Choosing a different forged address, or using many of them, is slightly more complex, and may require creating custom-formatted IP packets, but it's hardly a challenge to a reasonably competent programmer."

      Ok, go ahead and do it. Do you know how TCP works? I can't send you ACK packets if my system can't route to your faked 1918 address. The routing issue is a lot bigger than you are trying to make it out to be. Everything needs to be routed, and there is no guarantee of a symmetrical round-trip route!

      But, if you're so confident, feel free to write a program which will send TRULY ANONYMOUS EMAIL by connecting to machines and sending mail directly to the user (since the address is spoofed, you won't be implicated!).

      What's that? Not receiving any ACKs for your SYNs? Oh well.

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    3. Re:If it's so easy, by shepd · · Score: 1

      >What's that? Not receiving any ACKs for your SYNs? Oh well.

      Sounds to me like were down to one hacked router: The one on your end.

      Maybe you've got a clue, but today's frontpage shows that isn't Microsoft's style at all.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:If it's so easy, by swillden · · Score: 2

      Ok, go ahead and do it. Do you know how TCP works?

      Given that I wrote a TCP stack a few years back... yeah, I'm fully aware of how TCP works.

      I can't send you ACK packets if my system can't route to your faked 1918 address.

      Yes. And if the communications is over TCP then this all gets a whole lot harder. The original post that you responded to said:

      Also, since you don't need any reply back (I assume), what's to stop you from forging your IP address?

      Assuming Moonshadow understands TCP, UDP and IP, then that means he's assuming TCP isn't used and the UDP superprotocol doesn't ACK. Of course, he is probably wrong about the lack of acknowledgements, and probably doesn't understand what he's talking about, but, under the terms originally stated by him, your statement about having to "own" the intermediate routers is false.

      However, even if you assume that an ACKed protocol is used (likely), it's still untrue that you actually have to hack all of the intermediate routers. You do have to poison the caches of at least some of them (how many depends on how far apart your real address and spoofed address are, topologically) and you probably couldn't use a 1918 address. This is a sophisticated attack, but not an impossible one.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  90. A use for AOL!!!! by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2

    Woukdn't this the perfect use for AOL accounts. I don't think MS would want to exclude so many users.

    1. Re:A use for AOL!!!! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      XBox Live requires a high-speed connection. There's no harm in banning all dialup AOL users, as they can't us XBox Live anyway. If Microsoft is smart (i know, that's a streach) they've already banned all AOL accounts.

      Geeze, I hope I don't give them any ideas -- next thing you know, XBox Live will only work if your ISP is MSN!

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:A use for AOL!!!! by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2

      I wonder if they check the connection speed. If it on a LAN, then it should be possible to route it via another ISP, even over a dialup line. Difficult to do, but it would be kind of fun watching IP blocks get blacklisted.

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  93. Taking bets on Post Rating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3-2 infavor of insightfull.

    7-1 infavor of informative

  94. Don't try this at home, kids. by rabidcow · · Score: 2

    Ya know, I have no problem with pissing off Microsoft, but how about sticking to methods that are not grossly illegal and likely to get you a heavy fine and/or prison time.

    Doing this is abusing Microsoft's systems, it's about the same magnitude as hacking into their web server and taking it down. If you manage to actually accomplish anything, you will not get away with it, and Microsoft will have more ammo in the "all those evil hackers are hurting our business" play.

    So yeah, it's amusing that you can do this, but don't make a serious attempt.

    1. Re:Don't try this at home, kids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you noticed? If your a /. drone or 3l33t linux haxor then anything that keeps you from being stealing what youw ant and being a selfish git is the man trying to keep you down!

  95. CDs by cosyne · · Score: 2

    Now if only these were CD-RWs ... and they can keep sending me the nice, reusable cases, just no more paper sleeves, thanks.
    A friend of mine was actually asked "Buy blank CDs? Why not just use the free ones from AOL?"

  96. Change? Or Die? by Kwil · · Score: 1

    It could also result in Microsoft going, "Eh, this ain't worth the 300 million dollar loss per year. Shoot the whole thing and use the PR of cutting unprofitable businesses to boost our stock price and give anti-monopoly evidence at the same time."

    --

    That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

  97. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  98. How many pages again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spotted it in the railway station in Amsterdam snip (read it waiting for a train)

    Ah, the leafs are cleared and the NS really is back to their old schedule then ;-)


    /me hopes for a dutch train traveling moderator to catch this post

  99. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  100. nvidia sucks ass matrox rules!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nvidia sucks ass matrox rules!!!!!

  101. Re:Sending Back 1 Million AOL CD's.....No Need Now by hplasm · · Score: 1
    In other news.. 1 Million AOL CDs were accidentally melted when a flamewar broke out today in the vicinity of their thread....

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  102. Microsoft know who you are by natslovR · · Score: 1
    If you are connecting to live you are using your login details. To get your login details you gave them a valid credit card. At the moment they are banning modded machines but allowing you, the account holder, to transfer your details to another 'unmodded' xbox and connect.

    If you start geting machines blacklisted I guess they'll just close your account. Then you'll have to purchase another Live kit.

  103. By engagment by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    happy to give them directions and greet them at the door ... We would make a contribution ourselves to put them over the top

    Very good on AOL's part - they have CoOpted what is a PROTEST AGAINST THEM into a positive PR spin. I fucking love it.

    How disappointing, now when people hear about this, they will think these people were Beanie-baby-style impulse collectors of modern-consumer fare.. nothing radical, nice, warm, cozy farmiliar... how sad.

  104. Yes, they do care. by gosand · · Score: 2
    As for the Xbox itself, Microsoft doesn't care what you do with it, nor do they have any say in the matter.

    Are you sure about that?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  105. So which is it? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    You're getting wishy-washy.

    First it's "hardly a challenge to a reasonably competent programmer.," then it's "a sophisticated attack, but not an impossible one." Excuse my while I throw an InconsistencyException about your argument!

    I really, really doubt the login service uses UDP, unless they've put something on top that will manually do retransmission and acknowledgemeng. The Xbox Live! service does require that TCP port 3074 be used on the Xbox, so I'm guessing they just went the way of using TCP.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:So which is it? by swillden · · Score: 2

      First it's "hardly a challenge to a reasonably competent programmer.," then it's "a sophisticated attack, but not an impossible one." Excuse my while I throw an InconsistencyException about your argument!

      You're referring to two different arguments, and you know it, but I'll humor you:

      In the first case I was referring to the difficulty of spoofing using many fake source IPs under the original set of assumptions, (no ACKing required).

      In the second case I was referring to the router cache poisoning required to do the attack against an ACKed protocol.

      I really, really doubt the login service uses UDP, unless they've put something on top that will manually do retransmission and acknowledgemeng.

      I'm sure you're right. UDP (without explicit ACKs) is often used for in-game data because timeliness is more important than guaranteed arrival, but it would make more sense to use TCP for the login protocol.

      However, an ACKed protocol wasn't the context of the original question, and your statement that the routers had to be "owned" is incorrect regardless of the context.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  106. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  107. Why? by strombrg · · Score: 1


    Why would you -want- to run a modified xbox, when you can get a playstation? Why would you put up with being marginalized by microsoft, when you can be encouraged by Sony?

    Sell your silly xbox (and its games) and get a real console (and its games) from a vendor with a clue.

  108. Better Yet... by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    ...Sell your 'silly' console and buy a REAL gaming machine, a COMPUTER. Then, you can keep up with the latest technology, and run the emulators for (most) of the consoles as well, also, go online *not JUST with broadband, a la Xbox*

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.