Slashdot Mirror


Low Profile Satellite TV Antennas for Vehicles

Brian Mattis writes "CNN is reporting a new antenna system that allows SUV's, minivans and cars to receive DirecTV video and audio programming on the road. Future plans call for internet access as well. This could be a nail in the coffin of Sirius and XM radio."

318 comments

  1. Good by 56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In-Car-Internet + 802.11b = mobile open wifi ap's

    1. Re:Good by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      I have to say that your sig rocks. I listen to that MP3 on a regular basis.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    2. Re:Good by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      This doesn't have DirecPC capability. You won't be getting 'net access through it.

    3. Re:Good by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the second paragraph in the article:

      In the future, the antenna system will provide high-speed Internet access.

      Also the net access potential is mentioned in the blurb.

      --
      Why not fork?
    4. Re:Good by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Color me blind.

    5. Re:Good by fjania · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In-Car-Internet + 802.11b = soccer moms in minivans driving even worse than when they are on their cell phones

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just what we need. More distractions for todays drivers. Here's some clues people. Pay attention to the road. Kids noisy? Tell em to shut the fsuk up.

    7. Re:Good by 56 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes that's a fabulous idea. If your kid is noisy, you should tell them to shut the fuck up.

      Oh, wait, no.

    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than spoil the pretensious little brat, why don't you teach him to behave. You see sonny, for years people have been successfully traveling via car. Without the aid of internets, dvd, satellite broadcast and cell phones.

      Teach you kid some self control. Maybe he'll grow up into someone you'd be proud of.

    9. Re:Good by 56 · · Score: 1

      I like how the person or people wanting to discipline the kid, either by swearing at him or by simply 'teaching him to behave' are posting as annonymous cowards.

    10. Re:Good by Peterus7 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Two thoughts on this:

      If cell phones make people stupid while they're driving, what will this do?

      Also, if the RIAA ever wins over the government and makes P2P illegal, there could be mobile P2P... Wow, that would be fun... Car chases over 11 k/s...

    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In car pay-per-view pr0n. LOL.

    12. Re:Good by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      You see sonny, for years people have been successfully traveling via car. Without the aid of internets, dvd, satellite broadcast and cell phones.

      Yeah, and it sucked too. We used to take long car trips when I was young, they were boring as hell.

      I use a couple of gameboys to keep my kids occupied.

    13. Re:Good by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Just great. All i need is something that disconnects more often than an AOL dialup account. Think of this; your sitting there trying to load your email, a car comes by at 35 mph and you get a few k of data... you wait and wait for antoher car to finally be able to finish the download. I dont think that AP's in a car would do much unless you had a laptop in the back seat but why not have a cat-5 connection right on the door of the car or near the cup holder? Also when i buy a car i know im not going to want to spend any extra on something like this. Im sure many other people wont pay for this and for it to be very cool you would need lots of people to get it.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    14. Re:Good by orcus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe try introducing them to a good book for the car trips.
      Oh that's right - modern kids get someone else to do their reading for them.
      Never mind.

      --
      First they burn books, then they burn people.
    15. Re:Good by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      My four year old has a pixtar with the learning cartridge. He is learning phonics now.

      My eight year old is the top accelerated reader in his grade (not just his class). He reads at a 6.5 grade level. Funtional literacy is considered 6th grade level. He reads better than the majority of *ADULTS* in the U.S.

      He reads, but gets tired of it. Kids tend to have short attention spans. They need multiple activities.

    16. Re:Good by macrom · · Score: 2

      I get VERY motion sick when reading books in a car, especially in the back seat. I have no idea why, but a good book isn't worth puking over, IMO.

    17. Re:Good by InadequateCamel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they do not NEED multiple activities in the form of mobile roving internet access. All of us catch enough CRT emission as it is. I don't know the numbers and am loathe to trust them, but childhood obesity and (more tellingly?) diabetes seems to be rising. Why do you think that is?

      It is not the responsibility of the parent to buy crap for their children so that they can be occupied every minute of every day. Just because it is there does not mean you have to buy it! My computer has been online for a few months now, so I didn't grow up with the Internet or with the latest gadgets, and I like to think that I turned out fine :-) I had multiple activities, like playing with friends OUTSIDE and playing sports, and I did not read regularly (unlike your son, whom you should be proud of, though reading better than most adults in the US is hardly an achievement :-)

      TV is a terrible waste of your time. Too many of those I know are hopeless couch potatoes and it is a shame. Sadly it seems that those with short attention spans turn into excellent TV addicts (brain turns off). Providing even MORE computer access will do little to deter your children from this, IMHO. Half of the reason that you drive somewhere is to do something new and to get out of the house, not to take the computer outside with you!

    18. Re:Good by dhartman · · Score: 1
      Yeah no kidding!

      "Shut up kids! Oprah Blimpfree (or blimpy depending on the week) is on Dr. Phil this week and I want to see what her latest fad diet is."

    19. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This person Obviously has not children.

    20. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, you did not turn out fine.

    21. Re:Good by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      They don't have a computer in the car, they have gameboys. I only put a TV in the car for really long trips.

      Car trips are a waste of time. Until teleportation is common, we are stuck with them. I either keep the boys occupied, or they fight. Then I have to beat them. Which sucks.

    22. Re:Good by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Agreed, when I was a kid I hated long car rides, because I was basically stuck with my mind and my walkman. Books could make me sick in 20 minutes, and I'd feel that way the whole day, so I avoided them like the plague.

      Even video games would give me motion sickness eventually, although I found I could use them for an our or so. I can only imagine how my stomach would churn at reading Slashdot on the road. This is why I love finally being able to drive on trips, it gives me something to do.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    23. Re:Good by Perrin-GoldenEyes · · Score: 2

      Hate to ruin your fun, but it's even worse. The soccer moms switched from minivans to SUVs long ago. And to make matters even worse, they usually don't drive the smaller SUVs. I think the prime example of today's soccer mom-mobile is the Ford (found on roadside dead) Expedition.

      And if you think soccer moms are bad as a car driver, it's FAR worse when you're on a motorcycle and their stupid mistakes could much more easily kill you. Grrrr....

      --
      -Perrin.
      Now I want you to go in that bag and find my lightsaber. It's the one that says bad mother-fscker on it.
    24. Re:Good by gorilla · · Score: 2

      Motion sickness is caused because you have two conflicting signals. The motion sensors in your ears tell you that you're moving, but your eyes are telling you that you're not. This confuses your brain, and you get sick. It's worse when you read, because if you weren't reading, you'd be looking out the windows, and getting some indications that you're moving.

    25. Re:Good by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      No, I mean that once we start installing wireless communications into cars people will start bringing computers with them. You stated that your children use computers as part of their learning, and that is great, but you then stated that kids NEED multiple activities. In keeping with the original post and the fact that you earlier mentioned the Gameboys I just extrapolated from there to computers.

      There was three of us, and while it may have been bad for my parents at the time I think that because they didn't attempt to fill my every waking moment with activities we are all better off. Eventually, we all learn how to sit there and think quietly. Kids are being pestered more and more, and all they really need is to be left alone to figure some stuff out for themselves.

      One of them will fall asleep (unless it is a short drive, and then the "keep them occupied" argument goes out the window) and the other will start using his brain rather than a computer because there is simply nothing else to do. Or he will fall asleep :-) But it's a win-win situation.

    26. Re:Good by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you know me so well!

      I am really quite sensitive and frightened. Inadequate is probably a better word! That is why I hide behind a screen name, my dear friend.

      I don't even like camels. Do you see my problems?

    27. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf "soccer"?

      Oh, you mean wop-hockey

  2. Streaming audio by Steev · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Think of all the (commercial free) streaming audio channels that you could listen to instead of the crappy radio stations that exist right now.

    1. Re:Streaming audio by geek · · Score: 2

      That is almost the only real aplication i see for this. TV is cars is stupid not to mention dangerous. It's about time though that we had a good replacement for radio.

    2. Re:Streaming audio by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      we have a TV in our car - well worth it... those 12 hour road trips to utah would be a pain with 2 little girls in the back screaming about how they want to be there already... trust me - TV in the car is one of the best things ever to happen to this world.

    3. Re:Streaming audio by Steev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just not in the front seat ;)

    4. Re:Streaming audio by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      lol, gotta agree with you there... i just have the feeling that people don't spend 100% of the time in the car actually driving. like if you stop for something to eat, you could go through drive thru, park, and watch TV... but yeah, this would definitely encourage morons to watch TV on the road.

    5. Re:Streaming audio by Insane+One · · Score: 1

      The ones talking on the cell phone while watching tv and reaching into the back seat while driving will be cleansing the gene pool. ;) When they miss the turn in the off ramp and go sailing into the air....hopefully a commercial will come on and they will see what is happening. LOL

      --
      "I have gone to look for myself, If I return before I get back keep me here"
    6. Re:Streaming audio by cameldrv · · Score: 5, Informative

      Relax, it's illegal for you to have a TV that is visible to the driver.

    7. Re:Streaming audio by harlequinSmurf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dno't know much about the in-car TV's but a boss at an old job bought a BMW that had one in the dash. The moment the car was in motion the screen would blank and you would be left with just the audio.

    8. Re:Streaming audio by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet most of us survived quite well without a TV in the car.

      Hell, I have many fond memories of driving around with my parents. Reading a book, playing with stuffed animals with my sister, looking out the window (Perfect for my INFP personality), pondering the world...

      12 hours spent sitting immobile in the back of a car while staring at some canned entertainment doesn't sound healthy at all, especially for kids.

      Perhaps you should break the 12 hour road trip into 2 six hour drives?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:Streaming audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that would suck to actually have to interact with your children.

    10. Re:Streaming audio by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's illegal to drive without a seat belt also but that doesnt stop 10,000 people a year from doing it.

    11. Re:Streaming audio by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      in the car - yes. the car is not a good place to do it. that's why we're on our way to utah in the first place. it's obviously a family vacation to spend time with the family. does everybody hate me? this is like the 4th comment that is just randomly aimed at me for no apparent reason other than to make me look evil.

    12. Re:Streaming audio by oateater · · Score: 1

      More like 20,000,000... But yeah, TV + Driver = Crash. I'd like it if "Internet flew around like the radio" :) One day, that is my dream. Fast - Wireless - Free.

    13. Re:Streaming audio by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I grew up without TV in the car as a kid too, but wished I could have had it. Sure, I love reading a book, but every time I tried to do that in the car I got nauseous and threw up. Watching a TV screen probably isn't nearly so motion-sickness inducing.

      Break the trip into smaller parts? You haven't been out west, have you? Unless you want to hang out at some old gas station, or some town that has a population of 15, there's usually no place to stop in between.

    14. Re:Streaming audio by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      These people responding to you are complete morons. Have they never taken a long car trip with their family? There's really not much to do, and a TV to watch would be great if you're the passenger. Look at some of these retarded ideas they have:

      Chatting with the driver: potentially unsafe, and it's hard to maintain a conversation for hours on end.

      Reading a book: hello? motion sickness??

      Playing with stuffed animals: maybe if you're 3, but most people take car trips all the way into adulthood and beyond.

      Looking out the window: unless you're the type that likes to watch paint dry, this isn't going to hold your attention for long.

    15. Re:Streaming audio by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      On the contrary, I live out West (California). I've been to Utah a dozen times, and probably travelled 20,000 miles with my parents throughout the Western states when I was a kid. Hours in the car.

      My wife and I have done a dozen 12-hour journies through the West. Even done a big 20 hour road-trip from Boseman, Montana all the way to Reno, NV (Could have made it all the way to San Francisco, but it hurt too much). Next time, I'll stop in Winnemucca or some other town on 80.

      Sure, the west has big expanses of stuff that looks boring, but there are zillions of parks to visit, and some chain hotel (motel 6 quality or higher) within a few hours of eachother. Millions of people drive through the West, and there is a big hotel industry taking advantage of the opportunity.

      Of course, I don't have kids, but I have gone on several 5+ hour trips with a toddler in the last few years.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    16. Re:Streaming audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of all the (commercial free) streaming audio channels that you could listen to instead of the crappy radio stations that exist right now.

      No doubt. That was the first thing that entered my mind when I read the article.

    17. Re:Streaming audio by Earthworm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In-car TV is common for any fairly modern car in Japan. As you said the video will turn off when the parking brake is disengaged, however it is not at all difficult to bypass this safety feature. As a passenger Ive seen drivers watching TV at 110+ km/h several times on Japanese expressways. It's not at all comforting to see.

    18. Re:Streaming audio by secolactico · · Score: 1
      The ones talking on the cell phone while watching tv and reaching into the back seat while driving will be cleansing the gene pool. ;)
      Unofrtunately they might be eliminating from the gene pool third parties that might someday be necesary... :-(
      ...yes, I did see your smiley
      --
      No sig
    19. Re:Streaming audio by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's illegal to drive without a seat belt also but that doesnt stop 10,000 people a year from doing it.

      Spurious comparison. When you don't wear a seatbelt you don't drive any worse, and you suffer no consequences until you have an accident. If you have a TV in front, you drive badly, and the first time a cop pulls you over and sees that TV, you're in for a big, big fine. I guarantee that the first time someone gets ticketed for having a TV on the dash is the LAST time it'll happen. You can't say that about a ticket for no seatbelt.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    20. Re:Streaming audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when? i saw a replacement rearview mirror for cars yesterday that had a mini tv in the left side of it. and what about all those in dash dvd/cd players that the screen flips out and up to that the front seat passangers (driver included) can see??

    21. Re:Streaming audio by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2

      It's about time though that we had a good replacement for radio.

      What, you mean like XM and Sirius, satellite radio w/o commercials? Something like 100 channels? Sirius just so happens to be 60 music channels, 40 weather/entertainment/news channels. And Kenwood happens to have a great deal for those interested, that works out to about $50 plus installation, starting Jan. 12. I was just looking at it tonight, and will probably do it. We don't need DirecTV to replace radio in cars. The replacements are already here, and there are two of them, both good, both relatively inexpensive, and available at your local car audio store TODAY. For more info, Sirius is backed by Kenwood and Jensen, while XM is backed by Sony, Pioneer, and whoever else I can't remember right now (Aiwa and Alpine maybe, not sure).

      Ahh crap. I sound like a satellite radio commercial.

    22. Re:Streaming audio by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Watching a TV screen probably isn't nearly so motion-sickness inducing.

      You would be surprised... I actually tend to get more motion sick watching DVDs on my laptop in cars than I ever have reading a book. The worst though has to be reading a console on a laptop in a car, especially when compiling things and watching the text scroll by. Ugh. That'll make ya sick in a hurry. TV screens aren't quite so bad, but really the best way to keep yer stomach about ya in a car is to look outside so the motion matches what you're seeing. Anything else is asking for trouble if you do it for too long.

    23. Re:Streaming audio by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But where is the fun in having commercial free satellite radio throughout your 12 hour drive? The whole fun part is listening to the different formats and sounds of radio stations as your cross the country. Oh wait, forget it, that was before the 1996 Telecommunications Act and Clear Channel and Infinity bought all the radio stations and made their formats all the same. :-) Why not just get an mp3 player for the car? 12 hours of songs per disc.

    24. Re:Streaming audio by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      But in all the ads, the car is parked. There's no danger here. (did I really need to add a tag?)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    25. Re:Streaming audio by EatHam · · Score: 1

      The whole fun part is listening to the different formats and sounds of radio stations as your cross the country

      Especially when they have both kinds of music - country AND western. w00t!

    26. Re:Streaming audio by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Relax, it's illegal for you to have a TV that is visible to the driver. ...That's why you mount it as a HUD.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    27. Re:Streaming audio by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I've seen a TV that occupies a small corner of the rearview mirror on MTV. Don't know if that's leagal?

    28. Re:Streaming audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what we do on long trips. 4 cds packed with mp3's. Everyone gets to have songs and I randomize them so that there is a little bit of everything on each cd. It sure makes long trips seem togo by faster.

    29. Re:Streaming audio by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2

      My head unit happens to be an mp3 player also, but I'm still thinking about getting the Sirius receiver. You see, while I may be able to put 8-12 hours of music on one CD using MP3s, and while they sound just fine and dandy, my music collection isn't infinite. It's not even close. Sirius has things such as an Indie music chanel which is probably music I've never even heard OF, much less heard. So if I can broaden my horizons a bit, listen to something I haven't been exposed to before, then it's a good thing.

      Oh wait... that would be giving myself some culture.. we slashdotters can't have that now, can we? ;)

    30. Re:Streaming audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The transmission has a kill switch to turn off the TV. Easy part, I cut the wire to the kill switch in my BMW. Now, TV on the drive!!!

    31. Re:Streaming audio by Malachi · · Score: 1

      I dunno, back in the day (1982-/+) there were 4 kids in a big ol van, we'd go cross country and my dad rigged up an vcr and a minitv strapped down in the back (way before the times imo).

      The canned programming he gave us was things like Puff the Magic dragon and Bob Hope, Dean Martin, Jerry Lewis movies.. which I think has added to my appreciation of early cinema. You can't watch the tv the whole time and thats when I'd cut through those amazing choose your own adventure books ate through the entire robotech series.

      So I think you can turn out just fine with some programming for those long drives. Kids should still understand fundamentals of reading, self entertainment, and participating with the family on a trip, but without that in our car, I guarentee we woulda stopped more for an ass beating to leave so and so along.

      -M-

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
    32. Re:Streaming audio by Malachi · · Score: 1

      .. how does that work? I was in best buy the other night and they have those fold down tv's that go in the central top console which is perfectly visible to the driver.. if it was made to go there and its visible to you as a driver.. you still get a fine?

      I gotta think something like this is a little skewed..

      Also don't forget seat belts were a lobbied effort to not get air bags in cars.. it should be a persons choice to wear or not to wear a seatbelt. There are also stats available through the National Motorist Assoc. that show that seat belts don't always save lives and those without have a good percentage of survival rate.. something that has now just become another revenue generator for your local county.. (ok.. no more ramble)

      -M-

      --
      "Life is all about strategy, mathematics and psychological perceptiveness."
  3. cool by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 0, Insightful

    this is great. very cool.

    1. Re:cool by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ok, i have something to say to whoever modded me down. What are these comment sections for? they are for people to state their opinion. What did I do? I STATED MY FREEKING OPINION. Just because i didn't add detail doesn't mean the comment is overrated. Whoever runs this site better get some new moderators - the current ones suck.

    2. Re:cool by mstyne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, YOU suck.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    3. Re:cool by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      no argument there - i'm not the greatest person ever.

      thank you to whoever modded me up again - and sorry for saying "they suck" - not all are so stupid, and it's not sucking, i guess, just a really bad logical approach towards modding comments intelligently and neutrally (not taking sides on linux/MS topics - which happens WAY too much. i just got modded -1 flamebait for saying MicroSoft is better than linux (flamebait, maybe as in "what do you think is gonna happen on slashdot???") but it shouldn't have been -1)

    4. Re:cool by NathanBFH · · Score: 1, Informative

      The moderators are your peers: people who contribute to the forums get a certain amount of mod points every few weeks. It's the readers who mod up and down posts, not anyone that works at Slashdot.

    5. Re:cool by BarrettAnderson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      i did not know that. thanks. How do i get mod points? can I?

    6. Re:cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didn't understand what "mod points" he was refering to buddy. and no, you shouldn't mod that comment up, but you most certainly shouldn't mod it down either.

    7. Re:cool by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      The faq tells all. The first thing you need to do to get mod points is to stop getting so many 'offtopic' mods. It sucks, but many people with points are eager to mod down instead of up.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  4. Direct TV? by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, in addition to cell phones, people will also be watching 'Sex In the City' while driving? Yike.

    1. Re:Direct TV? by 56 · · Score: 1

      One would assume that laws ensuring no monitors may be aimed at the driver would apply/be passed if they do not already exist.

    2. Re:Direct TV? by sweetooth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Things like that do exist. In dash DVD players have to be hooked up so that they are disabled when the car is started in some states. However, every installation I've seen for one of those things has had a switch hidden somewhere instead of being hooked up to the ignition. Or, a switch in the middle to hide the fact that the safety feature is disabled. I can't speak for all states, but it's that way in several.

    3. Re:Direct TV? by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Don't be too sure... the 1993 "Visionary Tecgnology" Ig Nobel Prize was "Presented jointly to Jay Schiffman of Farmington Hills, Michigan, crack inventor of AutoVision, an image projection device that makes it possible to drive a car and watch television at the same time, and to the Michigan state legislature, for making it legal to do so."

    4. Re:Direct TV? by Insane+One · · Score: 1

      What about the other people in the car that are not driving?
      If I put a in-dash dvd player in my car and get the head rest replaced with in head rest video monitors for the back seat. The person sitting in the passenger seat next to the driver would be watching the in dash monitor and the people in the back seat would be watching the one's in front of their seat.
      I was looking at doing this to my car (my cousins husband own a car audio shop). He showed all the stuff you can do to the car which was amazing...like dolby digital, 5 channel dsp's/amps. I saw a caddy escalade he had in his shop with a couple game systems and lcd monitors...
      Another point I could make is what is the difference between navigator on the monitor and say the matrix?

      --
      "I have gone to look for myself, If I return before I get back keep me here"
    5. Re:Direct TV? by sweetooth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The rules only apply to the front display, so if you have a passenger in the front seat they don't get to watch because it could be a distraction to the driver. Rear displays are still ok. Of the units I've seen installed the cut off stops the display in the front from either turning on, or ejecting from inside the unit (display comes out and folds up) specifically so that multiple display setups still work.

      Your second point is valid, the onboard navigation unit can be just as distracting, but I don't believe they fall under the regulation which is for tv/dvd type media. Of course this is going to vary by locale, and I can only speak specifically for Nevada. Though I understand California, Washington, and Oregon are also regulated. I also have a friend that runs a car audio shop and he has to explain to people constantly about what they can/can't do, and then how to get around it.

    6. Re:Direct TV? by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Let's point this out right now...

      The law saw this one coming. DVD-in-the-car systems exist, but by law video screens must NOT be within the field of vision of the driver. No, you cannot watch TV while driving.

    7. Re:Direct TV? by Insane+One · · Score: 1

      I wonder what ohio's rule is. I have known quite a few people that have in dash video that could watch it while driving. The people I knew were smart enough to not watch or at least turn the display down or away and just listen to the audio.
      The problem as I see it is we need technical minded people in washington. The politicians that think a computer is a person that did complex firing solutions for the dept of war needs to be educated or asked to step down.

      --
      "I have gone to look for myself, If I return before I get back keep me here"
    8. Re:Direct TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nail in the coffin for XM and sirius? Doubtful. In nearly every state it's illegal to have a moving picture being played within the drivers view. Most people also don't commute with other riders. XM and Sirius' equipment also don't cost $2400 bucks. In an economy such as the current one, even XM and Sirius are struggling to hang on... and wouldn't you have to pay another subscription to directTV for this? BTW> Satalite based mobile setups have been around for a while. Check out AcceleVision (I Believe that's their name). They have a small dish that sits in what looks like a cargo carrier, and tracks the satalite at up to 20 degrees a second, and works with DirecTV. It's success rate isn't high either.

    9. Re:Direct TV? by 56 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah but what the fuck is a Ig Nobel Prize?

    10. Re:Direct TV? by The_dev0 · · Score: 2

      It's a novelty award given to pointless studies and stupid ideas, I think. Go on, use google. I dare ya.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    11. Re:Direct TV? by ChadN · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, in California it is already the case that I can watch TV while driving; I just need to be stuck behind a monster SUV (which are about a third of all the cars), with it's TV on (which is about an eighth of all monster SUV's). Since I can't see around the huge damn things, I have to look through them, and I therefore am occasionally watching some TV (usually through almost totally tinted windows though, which makes it even harder to see what might be coming up ahead.)

      Note - this only applies in heavy, slow traffic, though. Otherwise, I'm staying well behind those mutha's, or whipping around in front of 'em.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    12. Re:Direct TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex AND the City

    13. Re:Direct TV? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Informative
      Things like that do exist. In dash DVD players have to be hooked up so that they are disabled when the car is started in some states. However, every installation I've seen for one of those things has had a switch hidden somewhere instead of being hooked up to the ignition. Or, a switch in the middle to hide the fact that the safety feature is disabled. I can't speak for all states, but it's that way in several.

      This isn't something that varies from state to state. Federal law prohibits the manufacture of cars with driver-visible television/video, and all states prohibit the operation of a vehicle while television is visible to the driver. If there are cars with "override" switches, then these switches were added after manufacture, after sale, by a third party.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Direct TV? by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      I was under the impression these were state laws not federal, but I could be wrong. I also implied that these switches were added either by the installer, or by the owner and not the manufacturer.

    15. Re:Direct TV? by buckminster · · Score: 1

      The challenge is getting your universal remote to work with those slow moving monsters. They're usually watching some Mulan crap, but now we'll have the option of switching to adult swim.

      A new wave of freeway IR remote hacking is upon us. Rejoice!

    16. Re:Direct TV? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Federal law covers automotive manufacturing and prohibits driver-visible TV. Additionally, the feds have "strongly encouraged" states to adopt rules similar to those suggested by the Federal Highway Transportation Safety Administration. One of those rules is the "no TV" rule. Most states have enacted law prohibiting the presence of viewable TV while the car is in motion. The few that didn't already had laws against "distracted driving" and merely issued more detailed enforcement guidelines. You're right, actually. Installing such a switch after purchase isn't illegal. Flipping that switch while driving, however, is illegal.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    17. Re:Direct TV? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      It's not necessarily the moving pictures, but the 50 "music choice" (ha!) channels which are broadcast. Nobody really believes that XM and Sirius will remain commercial free, but DTVs MC channels are a cheap selling point - a way to add 50 more "channels" at a fraction of the bandwidth. There's no real need to change that.

      If you already have a DTV subscription, one would hope that your car would be an "additional receiver" at $5 (is that right?) per month. Besides, in two years the price will come down and you'll be able to pick one up for $150, and in ten years you'll be able to have one factory-installed in your new car for $1000. (Those detriot guys are always right on top of all that techno-stuff).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    18. Re:Direct TV? by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      Which driver? I get distracted watching OTHER people's TVs in their cars.. the few that I've seen. "Hey what movie is that? It's... it's.. WHOA! Phew that was close. Anyways, it's..."

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    19. Re:Direct TV? by mikeage · · Score: 2

      Not for long. It's going finishing up new production soon. Of course, there's always reruns...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  5. Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by pardasaniman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes!! I can now live in my car!!

    Internet, TV, Sleep

    1. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by Strudelkugel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Right, now family hour will be in the back seat of the car. Makes sense, that's where many families got started! Or should I say, "instantiated"...?

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    2. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by rindeee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Suddenly living "In a van...by the river!!!!" takes on a posotive connotation.

    3. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

      Oh, I get get it. Your such a geek you don't need to Shower

      Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot, that he himself could not eat it.

    4. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I get it. You're such a 13-year old you don't know the correct usage of "your" and "you're".

    5. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by PD · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I was malloc'ed.

    6. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing you need is sanitaryfacilities and then you are all set to go, otherwise it might stink a bit after your first set of meals comes out processed and with an odeur.

    7. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      Where are you going to shower?

      Oh. I forgot. nevermind

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    8. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by macrom · · Score: 2

      Maybe so, but most of us were new'd. Ahem.

    9. Re:Woohoo I can cut 100 Grand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that car will start stinking soon. Or does it have a toilet and shower?

  6. Oh god by geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please no. Cell phones are bad enough. All we need is some blonde in an SUV causing a 200 car pile up on I5 because she was watching Martha Stewart Living and talking on her cell phone while doing her make up at 80mph.

    1. Re:Oh god by xombo · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, it seems that driving is now becoming a luxury instead of a seious thing that people focus on, that is why we have to have speed limits in america. America is worst for this in my opinion, it is discusting, seeing these fat american people smoking, eating, talking on cell phones, talking to friends in the car, all at the same time. It is a discusting thing to see, it makes me think of all the greasy looking people on invader zim.

    2. Re:Oh god by geek · · Score: 2

      Its gotta really bad, i agree. I knew a guy that would smoke, eat and talk on a cell phone while driving his stick shift ford F150. He also had the worst driving record I have ever seen.

      The problem I think is people are seeing driving as a right and not a priveldge. I mean Ray Charles could get a drivers license in California. Some things need to change in a big way.

    3. Re:Oh god by TTMuskrat · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing until I read "equipped with backseat entertainment systems" in the article. This makes it a little better imo.

      On the same note, many cities are writing or looking into writing legislation making cel phone usage in cars illegal unless you are using a hands free set. Austin is one of those cities.

      --
      Support bacteria! It's the only culture most people seem to get.
    4. Re:Oh god by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

      A lot of vehicles that I've seen with televisions or whatnot have them mainly for the people who sit behind the driver and person sitting shotgun. So if they keep the monitors away from the front, I don't think this will be as big a problem.

    5. Re:Oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      just to be clear... it's fine if a brunette does this.

      Or a man. Or not in a SUV, or on I80, or if it's Arsenio Hall's new Star Search that's bein' watched....

    6. Re:Oh god by kindbud · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's a 200 car pile up, but you want to blame the blonde, just because of the other 199 TV watchers and cell-phone talkers, she was the first to blow it? What about the slashdotter in the Gremlin next to her who didn't see her swerve because he was watching The Making of LOTR:ROTK while encoding and beaming a pirate video stream as a test of the 802.11 free metropolitan WAN set up by his LUG using autonomous Aibos equipped with access points which roamed the city according to directions from a distributed program that moved the robot dogs around to optimize coverage at any moment under the control of a clever algorithm? What about that?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    7. Re:Oh god by niloroth · · Score: 1

      " A lot of vehicles that I've seen with televisions or whatnot have them mainly for the people who sit behind the driver and person sitting shotgun. So if they keep the monitors away from the front, I don't think this will be as big a problem."

      Well, first off, anyone who thinks that people who custom mod cars wouldn't be able to simply route this to a display to the front seats is out of there minds. We are basicly talking about the equivilent of the types of people who overclock their CPUs to get more FPSs for quake. They know how to do it, they will do it, and they will teach their friends how to do it. This will end up in the front seat, and it will end up being a cause for accidents. There is no way around that. I have already barely avoided 2 accidents in the past year in situations where I was wondering "what the hell was taht person smokeing", only to realize that they had a portable DVD player mounted on the dashboard.

      God help us if the old people who only have their drivers liscenses thanks to the fact that the AARP is a huge lobying block ever get turned on to this. I really will quit driveing.

      Justin

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:Oh god by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      It could be worse. It could involve internet access (like so many posters so far have mistakenly assumed). Imagine her driving around with a high-powered microwave transmitter on top of her soccer-mobile.

    9. Re:Oh god by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      I think the back seat is a little distracting, for other drivers! I saw one while driving on the freeway. It was really bright and I was inclined to gawk at it and find out what they were watching. Partly my fault I agree, but still distracting.

    10. Re:Oh god by mstyne · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duh, in that case it's O.K.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    11. Re:Oh god by giel · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, it's about access isn't it? I mean wireless access? Roaming access?
      I'd like to roam her access point. U ouch

      Have to l

      girlf
      mmblhhh

      --
      giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
    12. Re:Oh god by geek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Someones always gotta get all politically correct huh?

      How about the closet homo watching gay porn while jerkin the gerkin and gabbin on the phone with "CandyCain" down the expressway when he missed his off ramp colliding with the blonde do to spontaneous self inflicted "Pearl Neckless"?

      Any other minority groups we can put down?

      -todd

    13. Re:Oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --
      There's a 200 car pile up, but you want to blame the blonde, just because of the other 199 TV watchers and cell-phone talkers, she was the first to blow it? What about the slashdotter in the Gremlin next to her who didn't see her swerve because he was watching The Making of LOTR:ROTK while encoding and beaming a pirate video stream as a test of the 802.11 free metropolitan WAN set up by his LUG using autonomous Aibos equipped with access points which roamed the city according to directions from a distributed program that moved the robot dogs around to optimize coverage at any moment under the control of a clever algorithm? What about that?
      --

      Lemme guess, it was all done in Python, too.

    14. Re:Oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha the worst part is, the only thing you need to do this now(almost) is a few truck loads of caffine deliverd to mit.

    15. Re:Oh god by JPawloski · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of Jetblue - the airliner that has inflight DirecTV in every seat. Anyone else see DirecTV having a monopoly?

    16. Re:Oh god by afidel · · Score: 2

      Why do you think that direcpc is high power? This link indicates it is 3W max, thats not what I'd call a lot of power

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    17. Re:Oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa. you had some cool ideas in that flame. autonomous aibos that act as wireless APs... Hrm...

    18. Re:Oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you want to blame the blonde, just because of the other 199 TV watchers and cell-phone talkers, she was the first to blow it?"

      Blondes are ALWAYS first to blow it.

      Mmmmm...

    19. Re:Oh god by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2
      Well, first off, anyone who thinks that people who custom mod cars wouldn't be able to simply route this to a display to the front seats is out of there minds.

      Bear in mind that (in every state in the US at least) it is illegal to have a television in the front seat where the driver can watch it, turned on or not, for obvious reasons. Also, every police officer in the US knows this and the first time one either a) sees you watching said TV, or b) pulls you over for something else and then notices the TV (turned on or not), you will likely face a hefty fine. People driving with a portable DVD on the dash? I guarantee that the first cop that saw that pulled them over. TVs in the front seat have been a no-no since the advent of the portable TV and enforcement has always been quite strict ('cause it's DANGEROUS). This will never be a widespread problem.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    20. Re:Oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All we need is some blonde in an SUV causing a 200 car pile up on I5

      damn west coast motherfuckers. All those stupid bitches out there.

  7. Good. XM deserves it. by Caoch93 · · Score: 1
    I knew it would only be a matter of time that a much improved satellite-to-car system would become available. XM just isn't it.

    See my experience with XM for my reasons why XM isn't it.

  8. XM/Sirius killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article: "KVH's system will be marketed to current DirecTV subscribers, and sold through consumer electronics retailers. The antenna system will cost roughly $2,000 to $2,500, and the satellite programming will be less than $10 a month."

    I can't see this as being an XM/Sirius Radio killer until the price for the gear lowers quite a bit. Folks in the market for digital radio aren't the same as digital TV+Radio+DirectTV subscription.

    1. Re:XM/Sirius killer? by racas · · Score: 1

      Especially with this just being the antenna setup, not the a/v hardware... You still need either your dropdown video for the back, or in-headrest video panels, PLUS your sound system.

      I'm sorry, I'll stick with my linux mp3 box. It's cheaper and no monthly costs.

    2. Re:XM/Sirius killer? by SpacePunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Directv has been available for years to people that spend on motorized antenna mounts that home in on the satellite signal and keep it tracked. And that mount is cheaper.

      Move along people, ther's nothing more to see here.

    3. Re:XM/Sirius killer? by afidel · · Score: 2

      The upfront cost is kind of high, but as part of a new $30,000+ vehicle which is already having a couple thousand dollar entertainment system installed it's not out of the question. I can say that this would be MUCH better than the same couple of DVD's or trying to get broadcast in long enough to watch something while driving cross country. Bring the cost down to about half that and I would probably go for it, especially if you don't need a new subscription, just take your smart card out of the home receiver and pop it into the vehicles.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:XM/Sirius killer? by spotter · · Score: 2

      what about the phone line that one needs? wouldn't this be the be what those directv hackers would love?

    5. Re:XM/Sirius killer? by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Directv has been available for years to people that spend on motorized antenna mounts that home in on the satellite signal and keep it tracked. And that mount is cheaper.

      And it work's great when you're parked in the trailer park. It's hard to keep a servoed driectv dish locked on at 65 mph, unless it's in a huge dome. The point is this dish is kinda flat and fits in an under-5-inch enclosure.

      The press release might be a more reliable source than CNN.

  9. Silence is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " KVH's system will be marketed to current DirecTV subscribers, and sold through consumer electronics retailers. The antenna system will cost roughly $2,000 to $2,500, and the satellite programming will be less than $10 a month."

    I'm sorry. WHO will be paying that kind of money, to keep their kids quiet?

    1. Re:Silence is expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same people who buy fully-equipped SUVs for outrageous prices. These DirectTV setups will be optional equipment available at your nearest Mercedes, BMW, Acura, Lexus, Cadillac, etc. dealer relatively soon I bet.

  10. Jetblue... by MasterSLATE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of Jetblue - the airliner that has inflight DirecTV in every seat. Anyone else see DirecTV having a monopoly?

    --

    [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    1. Re:Jetblue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of Dish Network?

      If their buyout of DirecTV had happened, you could argue there would be a monopoly. But the way things stand now, there are two pretty big providers - just DirecTV is a better service imao.

    2. Re:Jetblue... by racas · · Score: 1

      Jetblue's got it going on though... I flew from Long Beach, CA to Oakland, CA. Free video, free headsets (which they didn't ask to be returned), and it all cost less than $60.

    3. Re:Jetblue... by mstyne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      just DirecTV is a better service imao.

      In my ass off? Is that you, goatse guy?

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    4. Re:Jetblue... by ArkiMage · · Score: 1

      No problem, this antenna should be compatible with DiSH Network as well. I have a Sony DirecTV dish I use with my DiSH system just fine.

    5. Re:Jetblue... by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

      No. They don't have a monopoly. There's still Dish Networks. They have a fair amount of subscribers.

    6. Re:Jetblue... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      What, you want to schedule a dish install on the airplane?!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Jetblue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like the freebie headsets that Jetblue hands out, you can bring your own. Jetblue is the only airline I've seen that uses a standard headphone jack with no silly adapter for proprietary headphones.

    8. Re:Jetblue... by joe52 · · Score: 1

      This is totally off-topic but American Airlines also uses standard headphone jacks these days. Now I wouldn't really recommend American (I had one bad and one terrible trip on American last month), but they do use standard headpone jacks.

    9. Re:Jetblue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      United has headsets in the seatbacks (in front of your seat) that you can use for free and also uses a regular/standard walkman-type headphone jack if you prefer to use your own headphones.

      I don't know if other airlines do this as well, but they also patch through the cockpit "over-the-air" transmissions (which is really neat to hear, esp. at busy airports such as Chicago's Ohare/ORD).

    10. Re:Jetblue... by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

      Well, what I mean is... I know Dish Network exists, BUT, EVERYWHERE is DirecTV. You rarely hear about Dish Network. DirecTV seems to have a firm hold on the market, and seems to always get the partnerships, while Dish doesn't. Just an observation

      --

      [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
  11. Oh Excellent by core+plexus · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    More consumerism: The antenna system will cost roughly $2,000 to $2,500, and the satellite programming will be less than $10 a month.

    Wow, everything is so cheap nowdays. Well, no matter the cost, I must have it if you're going to get one.

    Man Gets 70mpg in Homemade Car-Made from a Mainframe Computer

  12. Two Way by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if they just add in car black boxes and a two way feature, you can have the local news programs doing up to the moment reports on drives who crash while watching the local news programs on drivers who crash while watching the local news programs on drivers who.....

    Those ludites may have had a point.

    1. Re:Two Way by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

      I think you've got some recursive TV programming going on there... or is it recursive crashing... or is it recursive TV programming... or is it recursive crashing...

    2. Re:Two Way by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Or they could do a study to determine if more people crash and burn while watching NASCAR or the fishing channel.

  13. Well this is an accident waiting to happen by Kalewa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see the freeway pileup that would happen when the administrator of the first ever movile webserver gets slashdotted.

    1. Re:Well this is an accident waiting to happen by Snoopy77 · · Score: 2

      .. and the confusion that follows when identical cars, mirror images if you will, appear everywhere ... and some not so identical cars with a huge exhaust with goat skull stickers all over it.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  14. WiFi? by TTMuskrat · · Score: 1

    Isn't WiFi supposed to be the "mobile" internet access?

    --
    Support bacteria! It's the only culture most people seem to get.
  15. It's been done before. by sakusha · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is nothing new, tracking dishes are available at any RV dealer. They only work on the interstate, when the turns and the position change are gradual. Go around a 90 degree turn and the dish can't track fast enough. They suck.

    1. Re:It's been done before. by Nefrayu · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is different. It's a phased-array non-directional antenna. It shouldn't suffer from the problems of previous low-level technologies that you might have used before.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    2. Re:It's been done before. by curiosity · · Score: 1

      Which is why this is interesting, since it uses a phased array antenna, instead of an actual moving dish. Minimal re-pointing delays.

      Also new is the $10 fee to add the mobile programming. Normally if you have DirecTV in your RV, you need a separate subscription, not just the $5 "add-a-receiver" fee, since there's no phone line attached.

    3. Re:It's been done before. by regulas · · Score: 1

      You may want to read the article a bit. The current RV units are slow to track because of the mechanical nature of the tracking. This unit is a phased array, compleatly different type of thing.

    4. Re:It's been done before. by hhawk · · Score: 1

      Just a side point, even though the mech. units "fail" temp. during fast turns, they soon enough "sync" up. JetBlue uses such a system on their airline and is great.

      A phased array approach I imagine would be even better.

      --
      http://www.hawknest.com/
    5. Re:It's been done before. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Normally if you have DirecTV in your RV, you need a separate subscription, not just the $5 "add-a-receiver" fee, since there's no phone line attached.

      Orrrr... You could just have hooked it up to your home phoneline when you were activating it. Once it takes the hit, there's no reason it needs to be hooked into a phone line ever again, AFAIK.

      Actually, there's no need to have it plugged into the phone line when it takes the hit, either. It's just that DirecTV wants to see it "phone home" on your caller ID. Using that good old noodle, I'm sure you'll be able to think up a reason why the caller ID would be useless (party line, WPP, auto *67 dialer) and why after the first call it would never call in again (only plug it in for an hour a week to watch Junkyard Wars, can't leave it plugged in as you're living in a church on a hill). :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:It's been done before. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      yeah, and dont expect a nice clear signal while moving. cince it's Ku Band sattelite that also lives in our favorite Ghz land everything will happily attenuate and absorb the signal.

      Watch broadcast TV in a vehicle while driving... This is the EXACT effect that you will get unless you are driving in an open field with nothing obstructing the direction to the sattelite.

      oh and hope its not raining hard, snowing hard, large flock of birds.....

      I see it as a cool idea for RV's that way you dont have to use the bulky james bond sattelite aiming system... although they do look cool when started and the dish unfolds and rotates until it finds the signal..

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:It's been done before. by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, a phased-array antenna is directional. It can be steered without being physically moved, though.

    8. Re:It's been done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The KVH low-profile antenna DOES rotate in azimuth, "like a CD in a CD player", according to their press release. From my reading of their release it looks like it electronically points the beam only in elevation and, even then, they augment this with a little mechanical tilt. However, I do not agree that these in-motion tracking systems "suck". They track at rates up to 50 degrees/sec -- suitable for all but the most agressive driving. And even when they do lose signal (usually a tree or overpass), the screen freezes momentarily. They have gyros that keep them pointed at the satellite even with a signal disruption. That is you could be driving down a tree-lined street, loose signal because of blockage, stop at a stop sign and turn right while still blocked, and the signal would pop back to live TV the instant the line of sight is restored.

  16. Got Sirius, Not Interested by Beebos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Got Sirius, not interested.

    As far as what I want to listen to while I drive, Sirius has it all, except the Yankees.

    2 NPR stations, BBC, World Radio Network, Public Radio International, C-SPAN (which carries the network's sunday morning talk shows), CNBC, CNN, Bloomberg, and more.

    When I want to hear music there are 60 commercial free stations. Then there are about 20 entertainment channels. And TechTV is coming!!

    I couldn't be happier with it.

    1. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      My friend will be pleased to hear that you're satisfied -- he designed some of the antenna-pointing algorithms for the Sirius satellites, and was tired of hearing how well XM was doing. He, of course, is on the fence about subscribing. :)

    2. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by Cyno01 · · Score: 2
      And TechTV is coming!!
      On the radio?
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by ShaggusMacHaggis · · Score: 1

      i have XM radio and we have Cnet Radio (techtv used to be cnet tv)

      However, we don't have NPR :(

    4. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      Got Sirius, not interested.

      We know. And as an owner of a VCR, you don't want a TiVo either.

    5. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      Got Sirius, not interested.

      Of course you're not. You laid out money for a cool but doomed service.

      btw, I get commercial free radio as well...and I don't pay a dime. I change the station to something else when ads come on. Just like you do when any one of your 80 stations play something shitty.

      :P

    6. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by Beebos · · Score: 1

      I as aware of this possiblity and knew I was taking a chance. However, I looked at the finances of Sirius and XM and determined that although SIrius has fewer subscribers currently, its finances are in better order. I think Sirius has at least two years to make a go of it. If it fails in two or threre years, well, that will have been a fun two or three years for me.

    7. Re:Got Sirius, Not Interested by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      good point

  17. Competition with satellite radio... how? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This could be a nail in the coffin of Sirius and XM radio.

    Um, how? I was under the impression that satellite radio offered audio-only programming.

    First of all, most people who have TVs in vehicles have them for either a DVD player or a VCR. Sticking a movie in is going to keep the kids quiet for at least 90 minutes. Getting satellite TV only going to keep them quiet for 30 minutes at a time and encourage channel-surfing, which will drive the parents nuts.

    Satellite radio offers the same audio channels and programming coast-to-coast; fewer (or zero) commercials, and entertainment you can enjoy without having to take your eyes off the road.

    Don't get me wrong - I think satellite radio will crash and burn, but DirecTV for vehicles certainly won't be the death of it...

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    1. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by rizawbone · · Score: 1

      by your argument, people should get rid of thier in-dash radio and just play cds and tapes.

    2. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by Ledge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps because DirecTV offers streaming audio in addition to it's television broadcast offerings?

      --
      If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
    3. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by benh57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ahem. This is DirecTV. They offer many digital audio only channels, as well as video: See Here. No commercials, no eye off road.

    4. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      According tot the article this can deliver streaming radio.

    5. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      DirecTV has 36 channels of audio programming. It would be fairly trivial to extract only the audio stream from the broadcast once it's been decrypted and pipe it into your car's sound system.

      About all it's missing is talk radio... but frankly you can tune into a cable news station and get pretty much the same thing. Yeah, you have commercials again, but I think that both Sirius and XM have commercials on their talk channels as well.

      This isn't a satellite radio killer yet though... way too expensive.

    6. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Considering the quality of radio these days, I'm surprised anyone cares whether or not their car's deck has a tuner in it or not. Mine's permanently tuned to the local college station (that's if I'm not using the CD), and most of the time even they play nothing but bunk.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be fairly trivial to extract only the audio stream from the broadcast once it's been decrypted and pipe it into your car's sound system.

      Well, AFAIK it isn't encrypted (wow), and what little bit of "protection" it had was broken during the F-card days, which were (fortunately) pre-DMCA.

      Hmmm... does that make this legal?

    8. Re:Competition with satellite radio... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last time I checked I had over 120 channels of no-commercial digital audio on my sattelite subscription...

      Hmmm, in fact it seems that it has MORE than xm and sirus does.... interesting fact... NO regular channels with ad's ... ALL of them DMX style music only .... wow much nicer than XM or sirius combined!

  18. Aussies Beware by Malicious · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Gone are the days of fancy Boomerang antenna's on the backs of Limo's. Ah, the 80's

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Aussies Beware by 56 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's not a knife... THIS is a knife.

  19. SomaFM by 56 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No more recording the Groove Salad stream to listen to in th car!

  20. WTF? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This could be a nail in the coffin of Sirius and XM radio"

    Just like car-mounted UHF/VHF antennae drove the final nail in the coffin of FM radio?

    Apples and oranges.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KVH says its system will allow cars to receive more than 300 channels of DirecTV satellite programming and 50 channels of commercial-free radio.

    2. Re:WTF? by hendridm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Just like car-mounted UHF/VHF antennae drove the final nail in the coffin of FM radio?

      Obviously the moderators of this post have never seen or used digital cable or satellite television. DirecTV comes with lots o' music stations. Plus, Internet access would allow for Internet radio as long as it lasts.

    3. Re:WTF? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "and 50 channels of commercial-free radio."

      Sirius says their current system has 100 channels, including 60 commercial-free music channels. And the antenna doesn't cost four figures.

    4. Re:WTF? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Obviously the moderators of this post have never seen or used digital cable or satellite television."

      I, on the other hand, have DirecTV

      "DirecTV comes with lots o' music stations."

      Sirius has twice as many audio-only channels as DirecTV. And the hardware won't run you four figures.

      "Plus, Internet access"

      Satellite internet access in a car? Either you're talking about uploads via cell-phone (which kinda defeats the purpose of satellite connections), or you're talking about putting a high-power microwave transmitter on the roof of your car (something that the FCC (and possibly the FAA) seriously frowns upon, with good reason).

      FCC regulations require that DirecWay transmitters be installed professionally (x-number of yards off the ground, etc. etc.), and said regulations won't let you mount it on an RV (or any other moving platform).

      Try again.

    5. Re:WTF? by r00tdenied · · Score: 1

      That would be XM. . .Sirius has 100% commercial free radio.

      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
    6. Re:WTF? by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Wrong again. Sirius's 60 music channels are commercial free. There are still commercials on the news channels.

  21. Finally.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    .. real time traffic reports.

    1. Re:Finally.. by Isca · · Score: 1

      ...with real better-than-disney "motion simulator" effects when there is another traffic jam caused by wrecks!

    2. Re:Finally.. by ejaw5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gee..and we thought rubbernecking was already bad enough on the side of the highway we're presently driving on at the time, now people can slow down to watch car crashes that happened elsewhere

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
  22. Antenna aiming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    So this thing automagically aims the antenna at where the DTV sat is supposed to be? Last time I had DTV service if the antenna was a couple degrees off you didn't get a signal. I think the XM and Sirius satellites have a bit more of a broad signal pattern... Not to mention DTV sucks ass anyway.

    1. Re:Antenna aiming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you even read the article? for that matter did half the people that are posting comments identical to yours???

  23. Conflicting Trends by CatWrangler · · Score: 5, Interesting
    On the one hand, we have those who telecommute and stay off the roadways, on the other, there are those who basically live in their cars. I know several people, personally, who commute 4 hours a day in bumper to bumper traffic.

    It sounds bad, in that it might cause accidents, but it may in effect encourage carpooling. If folks had a wide array of entertainment options on their trips, this may actually encourage more responsible commuting.

    --

    ---
    When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

  24. Sirius by momovt · · Score: 1

    I have read where Sirius is planning on streaming video along with their current music. This way they won't be left in the cold.

  25. could be used in train by stonebeat.org · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In california, I commute via Light Rail (Train). Now if you put one of these on train, and make it data enabled, everyone will be able to connect to the internet.

    That could a good for the environment, as more people will like to travel on trains with internet connectivity.....

    1. Re:could be used in train by afidel · · Score: 2

      Japan is looking at placing 802.11b AP's every X meters along the path of the shin-con-sen (sp?). This would allow fast data rates and assuming the train is long enough great agregate bandwidth as people in different cars would be talking to different AP's.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  26. ummm.....no. by synchrostart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could be a nail in the coffin of Sirius and XM radio.

    Except that XM Radio has a nice thing in their music that DirectTV lacks in theirs.....really good programming. The stations and variety on XM are amazing. Fred and Ethel RULE. Throw in a little jazz, blues, all the classical, comedy and the 80s channels and you have a stunning group of stations. I traveled cross country in my truck with it 2 months ago and didn't hear the same song twice nor did I listen to a single CD.

    BTW, Heidi Selexa, one of the DJs from the 80s channel is great!

    1. Re:ummm.....no. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Except that XM Radio has a nice thing in their music that DirectTV lacks in theirs.....really good programming.

      A couple of years ago when I got DirecTV, I tried using their audio channels to avoid listening to repetitive radio at work. I'd set my computer to record an 8-hour long MP3 of a DirecTV channel, then bring it in to work on a Jaz disk (just about the only use I ever found for a Jaz drive, BTW).

      The problem was, even thought the DirecTV channels I listened to played more obscure music than the radio, they were still very repetitive. Each one seemed to have its own rather limited playlist. I got tired of that and gave up after a few weeks.

      Moreover, the sound was muddy even before I recorded it. The spectral display on my MP3 software showed that they did a sharp cutoff at something like 16KHz or less, and I'm sure they made other shortcuts on compression quality to save bandwidth.

  27. Available now in Korea by djupedal · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a Skylife satellite subscriber, here in South Korea, and the company has recently offered their service [site not in English] for those that wish to receive TV and music programming in the cars/vans, etc. Costs/fees work out to approx. US$500.00 per year.

    I've seen the installs, and while I'd like to have one myself, the external receiver unit is rather large at this time, and I'll wait for something less bulky. With the amount of time spent sitting in traffic here, this would be a welcome break. It's about the size of a 12" tire/wheel, and looks a bit out of place sitting on the roof or trunk of the average car.

    1. Re:Available now in Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering why Koreans drive so horribley. I'd like to know what that last guy was tuned into when he almost ran me off the road last weekend going to Seoul.

  28. DirecTV is stupid by Reikk · · Score: 0

    Give me a break with the stupid directv shit. The only thing it's good for it the amount of NFL games you get. It's music selection sucks. XM is the way to go.

  29. Re:Conflicting Trends (OPTIMIST!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OPTIMIST !!!

    It is more likely that this will encourage people to purchase even bigger vehicles that they can load up with more and more crap to entertain themselves with. At least this is going to the marketing standpoint of most automotive companies. I don't see this being a standard feature in Honda's new hybrid car, but I do expect that it will show up in many luxuary SUV's and full size sedans.

  30. how will regular directv customers feel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for 10$ a month getting tv programming to thier cars, when it costs 100$+ a month for that same tv programming to thier house.

    i know the equipment for the car has to factor into that lower rate, but still... i would feel cheated if i was a customer paying for thier service to my house.

    1. Re:how will regular directv customers feel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's kinda what I was thinking too. I think they meant that it will cost $10 a month for current DirecTV subscribers. Basically you will be paying $10 to have a second dish and receiver on your current DirecTV account. If they give the full DriecTV service for only $10 a month they better be ready for a serious backlash from their current subscribers

    2. Re:how will regular directv customers feel? by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2

      >If they give the full DriecTV service for only $10 a month they better be ready for a serious backlash from their current subscribers

      Isn't all the hack cards on the market the consumer backlash to current Direct TV Pricing?

      I have yet to see an XM or Sirius hack ... Maybe it's the pricing. You need to remember the XM/Sirius target market. Drivers who spend time in the vehicle on long drives. Satelite Radio is very popular with truckers, I don't see them giving up XM/Sirius for this. I do see them replacing the current Direct TV dishes they own with this new antenna for when they are parked at night. Setting up the dish each night is a pain.

      I also like the new XM Delphi module, removable receiver that you can move from car to desk to home all on one $10 subscription. I got mine :-)

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
    3. Re:how will regular directv customers feel? by journey- · · Score: 1

      The "Less than $10" is coming from the fact that it costs like, $9.95 to "add a receiver" to your current directtv bill. So for another $10 you can get an extra access cards.

      On a side note, if you want to save money on directtv just split it with a few friends. We split a dishnetworks bill for pretty much everything they have across 3 different residences, which saves alot of money.

  31. It's done on many Navy ships. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not uncommon for U.S. Navy ships to use these. The crew chips in and buys the dish and subscription. They scrounge up a junked tracking system from some obsolete system that's been thrown away Put them together and they have T.V. at sea. A big moral builder. Particularly during the play-offs.

    1. Re:It's done on many Navy ships. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >A big moral builder.

      Sounds to me like during this Iraqi "crisis" morals are the last thing the military should be building up in its soldiers. ;-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:It's done on many Navy ships. by smyle · · Score: 2

      Moral building? From televangelists?

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  32. but not Vans, Trucks, Busses, or mopeds? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    ...allows SUV's, minivans and cars to receive DirecTV...

    Am I the only one who found this enumeration a bit odd? I mean, why not just say "vehicle"?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:but not Vans, Trucks, Busses, or mopeds? by tellurian · · Score: 1

      It's called fluff...

  33. Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by Texodore · · Score: 5, Informative

    Has anyone posting about the death of satellite radio actually listened to it? As a subscriber of XM, and a very happy one at that, I thought I'd chime in.

    Advantages of satellite radio over DirecTV (and/or Dish Network) radio stations.

    - Satellite radio can afford more bandwidth just to the music than DirecTV, resulting in a better reception.
    - Satellite radio doesn't use a directional dish. I'm in an office building and pick up XM at work just fine.
    - XM has DJs. You can call in and request stuff. It's personalized, and they actually know music. It's not a playlist of 200 songs on random.
    - Audio stations on satellite TV are provided by a third party. They're generic, just a rotating plyalist.

    I'm not convinced those that knock satellite radio have ever heard the depth of the musical library that is available to the listeners. No way is satellite TV going to put in the time or effort to develop that kind of library or personalize it for those that are listening.

    DirecTV in the car isn't going to kill satellite radio. Anyone who has listened to stations on XM and the music stations on DirecTV or Dish Network will tell you that.

    For a good example of the musical depth on XM, go to fred.xmradio.com and checkout the 2002 Fred Essentials. Listeners voted on the 2002 top classic alternative songs of all-time. They're "playlist" is over 5000 thanks too all of the listener input.

    I've had XM since November of 2001.

    1. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      I've got XM in two cars and the programing is excellent.

      I listen to Hank's Place, Boneyard, Fred, etc and I find the programing to be much better than local radio (Portland OR) and a billion times better than the streamed stuff from Direct TV.

      I've heard alot of classic rock on the Boneyard that I didn't know exsisted before I had an exposure to this size of a library.

      http://www.directv.com/DTVAPP/see/MusicChoice.js p

      http://www.xmradio.com/programming/full_channel_ li sting.jsp?sort=number

      Direct TV doesn't hold a candle to XM or Sirius

    2. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by afidel · · Score: 2

      - Satellite radio doesn't use a directional dish. I'm in an office building and pick up XM at work just fine

      Did you read the article? This is about a phased array antenna, basically a synthetic array of direction antennas packaged together in on flat package that with the help of some software becomes an onmidirectional antenna, you don't have to direct this antenna to the signal, it locks onto the signal and changes it receiving pattern to pick it out. As far as the concern about DJ's if this was a big enough market I'm sure Hughes could hire some on air talent.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by tgd · · Score: 2

      I to fair, if you're in an office building and can get XM radio, you're almost certainly getting it from a terrestrial repeater, not the satellite. XM (and Sirius) are absolutely directional, and the signals barely penetrate walls.

      I get XM fine in my car, and at work (in Boston where according to my SkiFi radio I get nearly full strength terrestrial signal, and no satellite at all, even though I have a south facing window next to my cube).

      At home 30 miles outside Boston, I can get a satellite signal with the antenna stuck into any of my south facing windows, but no XM at all anywhere on the other side of my home, which unfortunately includes my living room.

      I do *love* XM radio though, but signal-wise its no different than Satellite Tv.

    4. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by tgd · · Score: 2

      I to fair? Ugh, mental note, no posting on /. before coffee... I meant "To be fair".

    5. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2

      Out in acton I can pickup that repeater on a cloudy day ... as for the antenna, before my skyfi boombox arrived I played with the car antenna mounted on a cookie sheet inside my house (leominster). It gets better reception and does not have to be anywheres near a window in the house (and I get 3 bars out of four on the sat.)
      To bad the SkyFi BoomBox and Car Kit antenna's are not swapable :-(

      I had a conversation with an RF eng. a few weeks ago and the SkyFi car is a phased array.

      Pay once, listen anywhere

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
    6. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

      or just buy out XM or Sirius ... doh!

  34. Possible extensions to the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five years from now. Handheld recievers with retinal scanning. Go to the mall and watch Farscape.

    Twenty years from now, cranial mounted recievers with occipital lobe scanning. Be propelled to a consumer reciever center and watch Farscape.

    In the future, you won't have to be at home to be a moron.

  35. Portable - that's the main thing by Nefrayu · · Score: 2

    So, depending on the size of this wonder, and any power requirements, I might actually be able to realize a unit that I can take with me in places other than my car.
    I like to have a handheld TV at sports events to watch replays and analysis as it's broadcast, especially since I often get stuck with crappy endzone seating (no, I won't pay for better). So once the price on this comes down a bit, it shouldn't be too hard to wire it up some of my existing gear and make a unit.
    All that's needed are my Sony Glasstrons, my DirecTV boards (repackaged in slim form), this antenna, and a power supply that can last 3 hours. I can't wait! Don't worry, once I build the thing I'll blog it up and submit it, and CmdrTaco won't post it. But you'll get to see it eventually.

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
  36. TV's do NOT belong in cars! by Zenjive · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's just way too much of a distraction, even if it's just in the backseat to placate your screaming little brats with Disney's latest brainrot!

    --


    A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
  37. Apostrophes beware by MrEd · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You get a 0 out of 3! Time for re-education...

    --

    Wah!

  38. Where do I send the cheque??? by Elvis77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where do I send the cheque??? It promises to "put an end to back-seat bickering among grumpy siblings during long family car trips". I don't care how it works or how much it costs I want it...

    --

    The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed (SK)
  39. Which way was that again?!!!!!!! by dmanny · · Score: 1
    From the article, (in the first sentences, no less):

    The Middletown-based company will introduce a satellite TV antenna that transmits movies, sports and news programming to sport utility vehicles (SUV), minivans, and luxury automobiles equipped with backseat entertainment systems.
    The last time I checked, CNN is still in the broadcasting business. They even are reported to have some familiarity with satellites. You would think they would know that this is a receiver and not a transmitting antenna.
    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    1. Re:Which way was that again?!!!!!!! by Nefrayu · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The antenna receives, but it transmits to the vehicle's entertainment system. Chain of command syntax is a bitch.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
  40. Reasons by yerricde · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only one who found this enumeration a bit odd? I mean, why not just say "vehicle"?

    Vans: Vans are probably close enough to minivans that the submitter didn't think it necessary to bother mentioning them.

    Trucks: It may be harder to mount such an antenna on top of a pickup truck.

    Buses: Buses are commercial vehicles and need a "public performance" license for the copyrighted shows.

    Mopeds: Don't even think about it.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Reasons by Radi-0-head · · Score: 1

      They didn't mention motorhomes, though.

  41. Radios do NOT belong in cars! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Funny

    (same rant, circa 1940)

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:Radios do NOT belong in cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same rant, circa 1940)
      My ass its the same argument. Maybe if you used the same sensory organs for driving and listening to the radio. Dood, if you can drive with your ears closed, u can drive while listening to music. Now trying to drive with your eyes closed? Didn't think so.

    2. Re:Radios do NOT belong in cars! by Elvis77 · · Score: 1

      I am sure lots of people drive with their eyes closed. It is the only possible explanation for the weird crap I see on the freeway everyday.

      --

      The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed (SK)
    3. Re:Radios do NOT belong in cars! by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

      Hehe, Queensland drivers are the worst. ic your from Brisbane too :-) (me too).

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    4. Re:Radios do NOT belong in cars! by Elvis77 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I think they all sleep between the Gold Coast and Brisbane on the five o'clock run

      --

      The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed (SK)
  42. the nail in XM's coffin by vena · · Score: 2, Informative

    doesn't need to come from this. they have over 320k subscribers and continue to bleed cash. 12 months to live, i'm willing to bet.

    1. Re:the nail in XM's coffin by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Coincidently, they have 12 months until they're profitable... though they have enough funding to operate through the end of 2004. Sirius is in a similar situation...

  43. now here is a device by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Funny

    that will decrease auto related fatalities. /sarcasm

  44. pretty neat except.... by zogger · · Score: 2

    ...this is really cool except for the price! 2500 clams?!? say WHUT? huh?

    I've had TV in my vehicles (all vans or RV's) since the early 80's, it's cool. Think I'll pass on phased array tv until it doesn't phase my wallet as much. I have a crank up and crank down swivel antenna now on our RV, works ok. If over the air don't work, pop in a tape. If that don't work, I got 4 other radios to choose from, 3 of them transceivers. If that don't work for "entertainments" I'll park and chase the ole lady around.

    heh

  45. Kinda like this... by bjtuna · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A company named Winegard already makes products like this. Check out their mobile dish units.

    cheers

    1. Re:Kinda like this... by MeanMF · · Score: 2

      I think "low profile" is the key here... Winegard's dishes are anything but.

    2. Re:Kinda like this... by bjtuna · · Score: 2

      This particular Winegard model is pretty low-profile... just 15" high. Not sure how high the ones in this story are; I'm too busy/lazy to check :)

    3. Re:Kinda like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. The new phased-array antenna is 4.5" inches tall.

      Not the honkin' 15" 43 lbs. contracption.

      Seriously, some people here have very poor reading comprehension.

    4. Re:Kinda like this... by bjtuna · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some people here have very poor reading comprehension.

      As I already admitted, I didn't read the article at all. Doesn't quite fall under "reading comprehension" if you ask me.

  46. Oh Great.... by thumbtack · · Score: 5, Funny

    First I have to deal with idiots dialing their cell phone, no someone watching the playboy channel?

  47. Marine units cost $3000 and up now... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Tracking sattelite dishes have been very popular on boats. The only problem is the expense -- lately, they're down to about $3000, but until the last couple of years they cost several times that. Maybe this will pave the way for cheap marine units, and cheap internet access for boats.

    There's nothing like programming from a quiet cove in British Columbia -- but I still have to go into a marina to pick up my email.

  48. Mobile Radio Telescopy by handy_vandal · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I want is a low-profile radio telescope for my car, so I can search for signs of intelligent life while commuting to work. (God knows it's tough to find intelligent life on the freeway ....)

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Mobile Radio Telescopy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, it's tough to find it at work, too!

    2. Re:Mobile Radio Telescopy by lostchicken · · Score: 2

      Damnit! You took my joke!
      I have a notebook that I let run SETI when I'm in the car and I say I'm using high-powered computing to search for intellegence on the road.

      --
      -twb
    3. Re:Mobile Radio Telescopy by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

      Transmit the message "Is O.J guilty?" If the answer comes back "Yes", that's a sign of intelligent life.

  49. Available now in Korea for much less.... by djupedal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Approx. US$#500.00 will get you equipment, installed, and service, for one year. Available now. I use Skylife at home now, and when they include Internet, I'm down w/the mobile receiver.

    As usual in the US, the [communications] consumer is being taken for a ride.

    1. Re:Available now in Korea for much less.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Korean system is much simpler both for the satellite and the mobile antenna. Because Korea is so small (by comparison to the US) the signal strength from the satellite can be much stronger than the US. That is, in the US the energy must be spread over a much larger area, whereas for Korea it may be focused (by a more directive antenna) to a smaller spot. Koreas coverage is more like the spot beams used in the US to provide local channels. Thus the mobile antenna may be much smaller. Secondly, the demands on the receiving antenna are dramatically different with respect to look angles. In the continental US the elevation angle of the satellite varies from 20 (tip of Maine) to 60 degrees (southern Texas). Korea is tiny and this look angle is much much smaller. This greatly simplifies the antenna design.

  50. IN SOCIALIST HOLLAND by giel · · Score: 2

    YOUR PHONE CALLS YOU WHEN DRIVING. No really.
    Since last year one is only allowed to make phone calls when driving if one has a handsfree set installed.

    I hate it, but it makes sense. Yet they have to stop al those @#$%^&'s from calling when cycling around town on their their bikes:
    'Wait a minute, gotta switch to my right hand. What? Yeah... Yep. I'm turning left, wha'
    C R A S H!!!

    --
    giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
    1. Re:IN SOCIALIST HOLLAND by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Same in Australia, friend. Pity the police here are too lame to enforce it ( or anything really that involves leaving the car)

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  51. DirecTV has probably already got ... by rtphokie · · Score: 2

    ClearChannel, Fox, Premier, and every other major radio distribution channel on speed dial. Heck maybe even Pacifica. If this goes down, I could see syndicated radio programs (I wont mention any by name because it will just turn into a dumn flame war, it always does) making their way onto DirecTV audio channels. Perhaps even in a way that they are only available to "mobile" subscribers who pay a premium for that service.

  52. TechTV isn't coming... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually... TechTV on Sirius is kinda aborted...

    What Sirius wanted TechTV for TechLive, it's 9-hour all day tech news and tech stock coverage program. Well, one market crash later that idea didn't look so smart, and TechLive is now the name of a 30-minute primetime magazine show.

    With the dramatic shift in programming diet, and the fact that TechTV doesn't own the radio rights to content it doesn't produce, I think all you can really expect is to find the audio half of Call for Help and The Screen Savers on a talk station eventually.

  53. This does not entertain... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...those of us who don't have a back seat.

    Bloody discrimination!

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:This does not entertain... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      If you don't have a back seat, you are in one of two situations.

      First, you are a redneck with a pick'emup truck. You would break the receiver trying to force in your Waylon Jennings 8tracks.

      Second, you are driving a sports car, in which case, who cares?

      Personally, I'd like one of these for my motorcycle. Would really help keep the wife awake on the back seat. Or if I ever get the sidecar, a TV in there would be pretty cool.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:This does not entertain... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      In my case, it's the latter.

      Who cares? Well, dammit, I care. I mean, what's the point of having hundreds of horsepower snarling and growling through a fat tailpipe, crazy tight suspension that judders over painted lines in the road, and tires as wide as Texas if you can't watch teevee while driving?

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  54. Jet Blue has this and ... by wytcld · · Score: 3, Interesting

    aside from the channels randomly going in and out, the ones that come through are most all thoroughly boring, unless your thing is sports ... several channels of sports.

    Jet Blue is so TV-identified that they have a bunch of large flatscreens above the checkin counters in their JFK terminal ... showing a bunch of network TV with the aspect ratio wrong, since they've stretched it sideways to fill those screens. At least the sound's not on.

    At least when we run out of oil we can park our jets and SUVs and watch TV. In Germany after midnight there's a channel with nothing but the view from the front of a car driving; another channel with the same from a train. Somebody better sign up the American rights.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  55. Conflicting technologies by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    Maybe I'm missing something here, but from advertisements I've seen I was led to believe that Direct TV now requires the user to hook up every box to a land line telephone line. My guess was that they were doing this to thwart the .001% of people who might locate a second box at a second location (like a relative's house) on a different dish and share the connection. So if I have a nice flat K-band dish for my car and receiver, what the hell good does it do me if I have to have the receiver hooked up to a landline?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Conflicting technologies by malice95 · · Score: 2

      thats no required. I only have 1 of my 4
      receivers hooked up to a phone line. there
      is nothing stoping me from moving the others
      to a car/mobile home

    2. Re:Conflicting technologies by bastion_xx · · Score: 2

      Not true. A co-worker has had DirecTV for over a year. No landline hookup cause there ain't no phone in his apartment.

      Normally both Dish and DirecTV will only require a phone hookup in the event there are multiple receivers on the same account, and, of course, to upload the contents of the smartcard for PPV purchase and whatnot.

      Also, both providers are aware of the snowbird (i.e., them's older folk that travel the highways and byways). They'll let you do the mobile RV thang, you just need to provide a registration for said vehicle.

      Now try to teach your father-in-law how to point the bloody dish when at a camp hook-up is another thing!

  56. How does this kill XM radio? by signe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, so let's see. DirecTV costs approximately $30 a month for a package that will get you the 36 (or so) audio channels that they have. Not counting any hardware costs. XM costs $10 a month for 101 audio channels, with a much better variety than DirecTV or Dish's package, as far as I've seen.

    XM has numerous pieces of hardware out on the market, both headunits and addon receivers. XM's hardware is already included in many vehicles from the factory. DirecTV has nothing in the way of dedicated audio hardware for vehicles, and very little in the way of selection or integration for their video hardware.

    XM has land based repeaters, so that you can get a signal when your LOS to the satellite is blocked (for instance, within most cities). DirecTV has nothing of the sort.

    And most importantly, GM owns Hughes, which owns DirecTV, and has a huge stake in XM. I really don't think DirecTV is going to go after XM's business.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
  57. here is one by zogger · · Score: 2

    --what you want(more or less) exists, check the freqs and specs out

    http://www.icomamerica.com/receivers/handheld/ic r3 main.html

    if you are rich and buy two, please send me one....

    right now all I got like this is an old b/w watchman I picked up for 8$ used. works OK, but this icom unit, well, you get what ya pay for

  58. On XM Radio by ironfroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    XM has had most of its nails in from the beginning. Many companies have been succesful in monopolizing on something they could easily be the only to give away. But, XM fails to realize two things.

    1) The majority of customers don't see enough worth in the difference between their product and regular AM/FM radio to be a good option.

    2) Building off a public network like radio doesn't work all that well when the current model has been carved into our brains.

    Once internet access is more common in vehicals, its only a matter of time before internet transmitted radio with location specific spliced advertisements is the norm. I welcome the change.

    1. Re:On XM Radio by larryj · · Score: 1

      You're probably right about people not seeing enough difference between XM and regular AM/FM radio.

      Unfortunately, people couldn't be more wrong. I can't STAND to listen to regular AM/FM radio after getting XM. $10 a month is a bargain for the variety, lack of commercials, quality of sound, etc.

      We bought a new car for my wife this past weekend. The factory XM setup isn't available yet and it's driving her nuts having to listen to FM and CDs.

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:On XM Radio by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, your opinion seems to be prevalent in those who have little experience with the satellite radio companies.

      You truly don't know what you're missing until you check it out. I've had XM for about a year now... I've had 7 friends sign up after some extensive listening. Mind you, in the beginning all of these people swore they'd never pay for radio.

    3. Re:On XM Radio by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, your opinion seems to be prevalent in those who have little experience with the satellite radio companies.

      That is part of my point on the matter. Most people don't know that they would enjoy XM enough to pay for it, and most of those people won't get a chance to find out.

      Additionally, by the time the "XM expirience" spreads to a sufficient portion of the population, a more open alternitive will be available that will be adopted first. What will consumers choose? XM Radio or DirectTV with internet access giving them millions of choices in internet radio along with internet access and 300+ channels? And people realize the need/want for TV and Internet on the go.

      So, which do you think they will be more likely to choose?

  59. Would you like to play a game? GTA online! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine if they come out with a net version of GTA... now imagine that you're playing it while driving... and everyone driving around you is playing too... reality... net... life... death... is this real or is it a game... what's the difference?

  60. Face south? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Need the antenna always face south? If they come up with an antenna that need not be directional, why not introduce one for the home market, as well?

  61. For those of us who have an ounce of common sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few thousand dollars vs a few hundred...who's going to win that battle?

    I just bought an XM radio system...the Delphi SKYFi system with the portable boombox dock. I must say, it is the best $129.99 + $99.99 I have ever spent. $9.99/month is not much to ask for all the channels you get...especially because I'm a techno/dance freak and the hick town I live in has barely seen a paved road since the days of Henry Ford, let alone music that can be made with something other than a jaw harp and a banjo.

    What kind of monthly charges are going to be incurred by someone with one of these new in-car dish systems? I spend enough money on my service at home, let alone pay more to have it in my car. Hell, an extra receiver in your home costs about $10.00 more a month.

    Furthermore, if you are in your vehicle so long that you need the entertainment of television over radio, you probably have no business being distracted that much in the first place while on the road...everyone knows lengthy driving is one of the most mentally exhausting things a person can do...you honestly want to make it worse by watching TV at the same time? And don't tell me that you will just be "listening" to it...that's a flat out lie. If that's all you really wanted to do, you'd stick with a radio.

    What happened to the days of practical inventions...these days we just seem to be getting off-the-wall, frivolous money-wasters that are worth less than the paper some talentless hack looking to make a dollar scrawls them out on.

    In conclusion, this idea seems about as constructive for the modern driver as the drive up liquor store...and will probably be just as dangerous.

    END OF RANT

  62. Let's project this forward... by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    It's been about four years since I first saw news of Boeing using phased array technology to put this stuff on commercial airliners for about $4 million a pop. Now it looks like the same thing has been shrunk to the size of a CD player and made available for less than one thousandth the cost. Can we expect this to shrink to a size and cost that will make it reasonable for my tablet in four more years?

    Also, one of the neat things about phased array approaches is that they are very frequency agile. Since the 802.11 world has now got FCC approval to pursue phased array designs to boost range to four miles,perhaps we can end up with a single system that would use 802.11 when available and satellite otherwise.

  63. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? -- Yes by DrRobert · · Score: 1

    I have XM radio and consider it a must for all the talk channels, BBC, old radio, comedy, etc. I don't listen to the music channels at home because the sound quality is noticably worse than CD... of course in the Mustang going 90 it doesn't matter much. The XM radio has really made road tripping better. The subscriptions are too expensive... I would feel fine with $2-3/month, but $9.99 makes me thing about cancelling it every month.

  64. This is great until... by supersat · · Score: 1

    ... you drive under an overpass, bridge, trees, etc. The last thing you want while playing Quake 3 from your back seat is major packet loss. Sattelite radio systems have the advantage of having terrestrial repeaters in major cities so this isn't as much of a problem for them.

    1. Re:This is great until... by essell · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea just how latent a two-way satellite connection is? I mean, I get your point. But your example is flawed in the fact that *NO ONE* in their right mind would play Quake 3 over 2-way sat connection.

      I'm not saying it hasn't been tried. But I'm pretty sure all sane people have given up on trying to play Quake on a connection with a 1000ms to 5000ms ping.

      --
      i swear my userid used to be lower.
    2. Re:This is great until... by supersat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know that sattelite connections are laggy. I'm just making a point. ;)

    3. Re:This is great until... by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      well you cant use the internet over xm anyways. im missing the point.

  65. Nail in the coffin? by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

    With a projected cost of $2-2.5k for the hardware, I doubt this will knock off sat radio for those who only want audio. A Sirius or XM rcvr is a couple hundred bucks, and the monthly sub is $10-12, similar to this. Since I would think sat radio is going to find more of a market with truck drivers and sales types, who mostly travel alone, (So nobody in the back seat to watch video), audio-only will predominate.

    --
    -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
  66. Ceiling mounted tilted screen by phorm · · Score: 2

    A lot of people have mentioned that DVD-players come with a display-kill setup which will kill the video when driving (although it's easy to disable). Another thing that might be worth mentioning is that a lot of the screens I've seen for DVD, TV, etc in a vehicle are ceiling-mounted and tilted so that only the back and passenger seats can see it properly. There might still be a peripheral-vision distraction though, but it looked like the driver could not at least directly view the screen.

    1. Re:Ceiling mounted tilted screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah so every driver *BEHIND* the Minivan/SUV can watch... Brilliant... BOTTOM LINE TV is cars should be mounted so neither the driver of that car NOR the driver of other cars can see it..

      In a Minivan on the floor or the back of seats is the right place.. NOT the ceiling..

  67. $4.99 a month, not $30? by name_already_taken · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you already have DirecTV at home, after buying the phased array antenna and mobile receiver, couldn't you just add the receiver onto your current home DirecTV account as an additional receiver.

    My 2nd box only costs me $4.99 a month, how is this different?

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:$4.99 a month, not $30? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >My 2nd box only costs me $4.99 a month, how is this different?

      Dumb people that tell DirecTV their other receiver is in an RV, or can't be hooked up to a phone line get charged the extra idiot tax, that's how. ;)

  68. XM and others still good by dethl · · Score: 1

    I have Dish Network...their audio programming sucks balls. On top of that, its worthless for me to have a TV and satellite reciever in the car if i'm the only one driving it.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
  69. If they can afford it... by Peterus7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This thing is gonna be a godsend for truckers.

  70. OT: Babelfish translations from Korean to English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Has anyone tried Babelfish's Korean to English translator before? The results you get make no sense. I mean it's not like doing German to English where you simply end up with bad grammer. I'm talking about "where the hell did that come from" kind of translations. Try running http://www.skylife.com/system/index.html through the Fish. Look at the far left column. "3 rose of Sharon satellites?". What the hell? Or futher down the page under "Classification", where it says "phay With wheat leaf wool syen - temporary disability every". I have no idea what it says in Korean, but how does Babelfish come up with that?

    The Japanese to English translator works pretty well. Or at least significantly better than this. What is it about Korean that makes it so hard for translation software to decypher?

  71. this is ancient by XO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I started working for the company I work for, 8 years ago, a person approached me, and mentioned "I work for a company that designed a DirecTV dish that automatically tracks the satellite while you're moving. You mount it on your RV or camper, and it just follows along."

    At that point, the price was $3k.

    Old News.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  72. It won't be DirecTV internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just canceled my account, they're going broke! :)

  73. heh, only 2? by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 2

    Stuff like this will put alot more nails in alot more coffins then 2 satilite radio companies. When people are driving, they need to be DRIVING, With their eyes on the road, not watching the damned TV. And people will, and people will die because of it. The thing with Cellphones is that they only take your mind and an ear to use, but do not require you to stop watching the road less your dialing and don't know where the hell the numbers on the keypad are. What is going to happen here is the same damned thing that happenes at home. Some people will be watching the TV, and something really interesting will come on, and you will be not watching it and doing something else, and everyone will start laughing or something and you Look Over. The only difference is here, your in control of something moving very fast. That's not the problem though, if the fucking idiot who had a TV put in that they could see dies and so does their family, that's not a problem, there are too many people out there anyways. The problem is when he does this surrounded by other people and OTHER people suffer from that fuckers mistake.

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
  74. Anyone got a good pointer for phased array tech? by CityZen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know the very basics of a phased-array antenna: you've got a bunch of little antennas, and you combine their signals by matching the phase delay from the feed line for each one.

    But how do you aim them in the case of a mobile unit like this? The only other phased-array DBS antenna I've seen requires you to point the whole thing.

    Also, DirecWay uses linear polarization (vs. circular polarization for DBS). How is that handled? (ie, you've got to deal with not only azimuth and elevation, but also skew angle.)

  75. NOT QUITE A NAIL IN THE COFFIN... by raam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many people are going to pay $2500? How many want to watch TV in their cars?? How many people want only 50 DirecTV muzak stations without DJ's and dedicated stuff that XM and Sirius provide???

    Jumping the gun a bit, nostradamus.

    1. Re:NOT QUITE A NAIL IN THE COFFIN... by loganjw · · Score: 1

      I agree w/ raam. I have XM myself (and love it) and I see no need for in vehicle television. I'm single anyways and drive a Civic so I wouldn't need that expensive stuff anyways. Besides, doesn't DirectTV just stream random songs on their stations? I'm sure it's not like XM where I can call or email them with song requests or actually get on the air.

    2. Re:NOT QUITE A NAIL IN THE COFFIN... by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 1

      I love my XM radio. I had to go down to Mexico a while back and it was with me all the way. I got a nice strong signal while in Mexico as well. Plus, I love having CNN and my 90s station at all times.
      Long live the Delphi Skyfi radio!!!

  76. Re:Has anyone listened to satellite radio? -- Yes by DennyK · · Score: 2

    If you don't want to pay the monthly fees, why not get an MP3 player? The CDR MP3 players aren't much more expensive than a good CD head unit, and you can fit 10 hours of 128K MP3s (which sound just as good as a CD in a moving car, and much better than FM) on a CD-R. A few CDs would tide you over for even the longest road trip. And whenever you get bored with your current selections, just hit KaZaa^W^W err...legally purchase more music and make some new ones. The only think you might not like is the lack of talk radio, but personally, I consider that a huge plus. (Have you ever tried to find a radio station that plays music 24/7 in Central FL? There must be some sort of state law that says radio stations can only play idiotic blathering "talk shows" between 8AM and noon, and those lame "My Sex Life Sucks So I'll Call The Radio Station And Whine About It" shows after midnight. ;-D )

    My JVC was the best $300 I ever spent. I haven't had to listen to an annoying radio ad or loudmouthed DJ for months.

    DennyK

  77. KVH makes some other cool stuff by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They make a DataScope which is a monocular witha digital range finder and compass built in. Its sort of like the device luke was using when he got hit over the head. I've wanted one to help line of the pringles cans

  78. Heh, Heh! Now to Hack Poindexter From My Limo! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny

    In a few years, I can hack from my limo (babes in the back), using encrypted links, no one can find me, no one can stop me, I can get in anywhere...

    BWHAHAHAHAHAHAH....

    Oh, wait...

    Sorry, thought I was posting to Phrack...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  79. Added input on the technology by tacocat · · Score: 2

    I first saw this some 15 years ago in a NASA TechBriefs article. It's been 15 years in the making before someone could propose making a commercially viable product.

    After a brief conversation with a Radio Guru in my workplace it was concluded that this is going to be very expensive and with the existing infrastructure of cellular and land-line already inplace, not likely to be adapted as a general use product.

    It might be useful for streaming data one way, but it won't do well with two way communications because of the economics of having all your users in dense areas. Even with one way data streaming it's a bit pricey. A better cellular network would kill this in a heartbeat

  80. PARENT NOT FUCKING OFFTOPIC by doc_traig · · Score: 2

    Christ, enough with the incompetent moderating. Please, let's take the points away from these uptight, trigger-happy douchebags already.

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
  81. So, catching DirecTV hackers... by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    could now turn into a high speed chase?

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  82. Now remember kids... by browman · · Score: 1

    ..driving while watching TV is dangerous.

    For those who absolutely feel the need to be able to melt your brain during this one time of the day where you previously couldn't. Thanks in advance for ridding yourselves from the gene pool.

    --
    You fool! You've given cheese to a lactose intolerant volcano god! Do you know what that means?
  83. Re:Good. XM deserves it. by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

    Eh... I've had XM for about a year and have nothing but the highest praise for the company. I travel quite a lot, so I liked the idea of not losing radio stations as I drove.

    XM is great. I've only lost signal one time... in the tunnel from Cincinnati to Kentucky. The programming on the dance channels is beyond excellent, and ever request I've made has been played within half an hour.

    I don't know what more you could ask for...

  84. Theft? Car Wash? by jot445 · · Score: 1

    It's enough trouble to keep the $500.00 radio in the Jeep from getting stolen (much less my Jeep itself!). How am I gonna keep this $2000.00 unit from getting lifted the first time I leave my SUV in the parking garage overnight?

    Further, what will going through the automatic car wash do to this unit? Scrape it right off? Clean up the signal a little?

    Wake me when they build the unit into the car or inside the car.

    "A real friend says to you in the jail the morning after, "Hell yeah, that was fun! Let's do it again!""

    --
    The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  85. Not for Cars, for Apartments by dscottj · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody has noted the potential this has for folks with space and location restrictions. There's an untapped market of potentially tens of thousands of apartment renters out there who can't, or won't, mount even a smallish dish but who would be happy to have satellite TV.

    The only way to get a dish in my old apartment, for example, was to mount it on a tripod in my living room. No thanks. With this thing you could just suction-cup it to a window and you're in 'bidness.

    $2500 is too steep by a factor of five, but if successful I'm sure it'd come down in price.

    --
    AMCGLTD.COM. Where cats, science fictio
  86. Illiterate Pig Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not as bad as your spelling or should I say, "not as 'discusting'."

    Literate Americans spell the word thusly: disgusting.

    Now, you try. Don't forget to stay in school and say "ugh" to drugs.

  87. Great, just friggin great by DigitalDad · · Score: 1

    I already have major problems with people using cell phones while driving, now they will be watching Springer at highway speeds. Now there will be whole new excuses for irratic driving and subsequent accidents.

    Cop: "What happened here?"
    Driver: "I'm sorry officer, I was watching Jerry Springer when a fight broke out and got emotional"

    Just a plain ole STUPID idea.

    --


    My good sig is in the laundry
  88. This will completely invert the age old argument by way2trivial · · Score: 0

    known as "shotgun"

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  89. Oh Good! by TitleSeventeen · · Score: 1

    Now i can play unreal tournament while i am driveing on the turnpike

  90. Moderators -- Please Read by Violet+Null · · Score: 2

    Once again, JPawloski plagiarizes a post. The parent post is a copy of this post. Note that the linked post was made about two hours before the parent.

    If you want to moderate the comment, please mod the parent post down and the original post up.

  91. May be good for RVs by Tananda+Trollop · · Score: 0

    I own an RV, but have held off from buying "in motion sattelite tv" because the price is rediculous ($3000 - $5000 for hardware). The setup uses a nearly full-size direcTV dish but puts it under a radome and has to actively track GPS coords and direction of travel to keep the signal. (Lots of complex circuitry and moving parts to wear out)

    This thing looks like it would REALLY make it affordable for RV owners, assuming it's:

    1) Not Vaporware
    2) Decent Quality

    As to having one in a car, I suppose if you're tired of buying video games and DVDs to keep the kids quiet, it's not such a bad idea.

  92. Aiming for Satellites and Ground Repeaters by WeirdKid · · Score: 1
    This may be offtopic and a bit ignorant on my part, but why is it that a DirecTV dish needs to be somewhat precisely aimed at a satellite, but an XM antenna merely needs a line of sight to the southern sky? Is there a significant difference in the way these satellites are broadcasting?

    Also, before you write off XM, is DirecTV planning on deploying ground-based "terrestrial repeaters" as XM has?

  93. benefit to land-based DirecTV? by nlh · · Score: 2

    Pardon my lack of knowledge of phased-array antenna technology, but does such a system now eliminate the requirement of a clear-facing southern view to get DirecTV access?

    There are lots of people I know in lots of places (i.e. apartments) where they'd _love_ to get DirecTV and dump the cable monopoly, but simply can't because either their apartment faces the wrong direction, the landlord won't let them put a dish on the room, the building has a contract with another cable company, etc, etc.

    I'm lucky because my apartment faces south-west, so I'm the envy among my TV-watching friends in that I can actually get DirecTV in Manhattan, but there are plenty of folks who aren't so lucky.

    So does this mean more access to DirecTV?

    nlh

  94. I *have* listened to XM.....and it sucks! by butt-rock+camaro · · Score: 1

    First off, it seems like nothing more than even more "sounds all the same" corporate broadcasting than what's already available on my FM dial. How many more "new rock alternative" or classic rock stations do I need? Not to mention that the DJ inevitably are all fuckheads too; talking over every song. So IMO, the $9.99 or whatever for XM is not worth it.

    But what really gets me is the fact that it doesn't even work everywhere! It seems to have a lot of holes in my area. (Bremerton, WA) I rode around with a friend who had XM in his car; it didn't work coming up the street where I live, it doesn't work at all in the Western part of the county, it didn't work in many places on a drive to Seattle, etc. Simply put, when I think "satellite radio," I expect a service that works everywhere a satellite can see (with the usual exceptions like tunnels, etc.).

    Apparently Sirius is supposed to have much better coverage; they use three elliptical orbit satellites as opposed to one geosynchronous sat. The idea being your antenna gets a better signal due to the fact that the signal source is closer, and not so much on the horizon. But whatever the technical stats are, my real question is whether they can pull off good programming.

    It seems like they're going a long way with commercial free programming, and they carry NPR. In fact, if they had KEXP (Experience Music Project's station), there is no question that I'd subscribe to Sirius.

  95. It's too bad we can't get one for home use. by Artifex · · Score: 2

    ...or rather, for apartment use. When you live in a "community" that has rules restricting your ability to mount anything on the walls or roof, and you don't want to put anything down at ground level because someone might walk by and steal it, it's rather hard to get set up for satellite tv, unless you want to do the sackcrete-box-and-pole route, which isn't always sturdy, can still be a pain to set up, etc.

    An omnidirectional flat antenna wouldn't attract nearly as much attention, is easier to place, and I suspect that you could probably stick it in a window if you didn't have a balcony or anything outside with line-of-sight to the satellites.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  96. Everyone missing the point by Mordac · · Score: 1

    This is a consumer multi-phased array dish. A flat dish that doesn't need aimed. Navy uses them but they're massive, this is tiny by comparison. You're looking at a very happy RV/Bus market where the $2000 cost isn't bad. In five years the price will drop down so that it can be used on a house rooftop at the same price of a nice dual-lnbf dish.

    No more placing 2 dishes on a roof to get signals from 2 different satellite orbits, just one flat tile that blends in with your fiberglass shingle roof.

  97. Got Replay, Not Interested by Beebos · · Score: 1

    Got Replay, Not Interested

  98. Will never take off by tbonium · · Score: 1

    Seriously folks, has anyone looked at how big these antennas are? Read on for my contribution to the FUD:

    If you had a Hummer and wanted to go camping, I could see this as a solution to the TV-addicted society.

    "Hey honey, let's go camping." - "No, I'll miss Springer." - "No you won't, I just bought a big thing for the roof of the car, so you can watch while I fish"

    Also, if I were a thief, the stupid EXTERIOR antenna (which covers an entire roof-rack) would be equivalent to a big "BREAK HERE" sign.

    If I were a cop, I would sit in a helicopter and start TV-profiling for drivers that needed a ticket to lighten their wallet. As an added bonus, my coworkers could watch Dr. Phil while writing the tickets.

    If there is any hope, it would require HDTV OTA, good signal coverage, and an internal antenna. The minute you lose view of the southern-sky, the DirecTV signal dies (tunnel, anyone?). The line-of-sight isn't an issue on a boat (unless you are circumnavigating the world). The company's original target market is the boating community, not autos. The technology is cool, but the application of it is dubious. These things have a better chance if they are made for a golf cart.

  99. Talk about a 'rip off'... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... I assume these antennae need to be fitted externally?

    at $2k a pop, I foresee a lot of "rip-offs" to anyone who doesn't garage their car behind a stout lock..

  100. Scary Scenario by coopaq · · Score: 1
    I will chase and haunt the guy
    in front of me if I am trying to use 802.11b
    to download music from his car. He will swerve, brake,
    slow down and speed up with me on his ass the whole time
    not knowing that he has that rare pink floyde track I want.

    -J

  101. Cool. by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

    Gotta go buy one of those for the Buick!

  102. Rollover Sledding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it now.... the SUV with the new 'Sled-after-rollover' feature, since that antenna adds enough surface area to the roof. Once more thing that a normal person has to watch out for - 4-inch thick flying saucers that communicate with outer space.

  103. Re:Anyone got a good pointer for phased array tech by CityZen · · Score: 1

    I've done a little research, and I think I've figured out the aiming:

    The phase delay from each micro-antenna must be electronically adjustable. By carefully tuning the delay from each element, you can effectively aim the antenna.

    This makes sense if you imagine the wave fronts as they intersect with the antenna. By carefully choosing what "points in time" are added up from each element, you can put together the wave fronts coming from the direction of your choice.

    I still haven't figured out the polarization issue, but I imagine that they effectively have two antennas at right angles to each other, and that by doing some trignometric calculations on the two signals, they can figure out the original cross-polarized signals.