Slashdot Mirror


Soundless Music?

Julez writes "Hi, Found this on icLiverpool's site, thought you might find this interesting.... A bizarre experiment in soundless music has revealed how people's emotions are affected by noises they cannot hear..."

362 comments

  1. hand? by D4Vr4nt · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..Like the sound of one hand clapping?

    --
    R4NT.com - A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
    1. Re:hand? by AyeFly · · Score: 1

      heh, i can clap with one hand. lock your wrist back, while keeping your fingers loose. shake vigorously. your fingers should slap your palm, therefore your clapping with one hand.

      --
      Sig- http://www.dreamhost.com/rewards.cgi?ayefly
    2. Re:hand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know I cry out in agony every time a tree falls in the woods, and I'm not there.

      It's sympathetic pains of the dog in me feeling for the bark that is torn away.

      That's got to be it.

    3. Re:hand? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Or you can just clap with one hand like Bart does: hit the palm of your hand with your fingertips

    4. Re:hand? by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

      Ahem...actually, that's the secret slashdot NERD handshake that you're talking about...you need to be careful whom you perform that feat around or you'll be single for life.

      Remember, you've been warned. :-D
      Cheers!

      --
      Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
    5. Re:hand? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The koan is also phrased as "You can make the sound of two hands clapping. Now what is the sound of one hand?"
      Hakuin Ekaku (1686-1769)

      One can imagine that the "sound of one hand" question is answerable, while the "sound of one hand" query is nonsense. If one can be enlightened by pondering nonsense, so be it.

    6. Re:hand? by tevman · · Score: 1

      actually the sound of one hand clapping is explained here

      --
      sig is broken try again tomorrow
    7. Re:hand? by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Imagine the following:

      A: What is the sound of one hand clapping?
      B: Thinks about two hands clapping
      B: Thinks about one hand ...
      B: Tries to answer the question by thinking about it as he usually does
      B: ...recognizes, how his thoughts speed along fixed rails like a train
      B: is suddenly able to leave the rails and becomes enlightened.

    8. Re:hand? by Open_The_Box · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that mean the bark is worse than the sound-bite?

      Sorry... sorry... bye... sorry...bye...

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
    9. Re:hand? by tenman · · Score: 1

      well put

    10. Re:hand? by Walrus99 · · Score: 1

      If the cypress tree in the garden falls on Schroedinger's cat, does the cat make a sound?

    11. Re:hand? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Should have been" One can imagine that the "sound of one hand" question is answerable, while the "sound of one hand clapping" query is nonsense. "

      Ah well...

    12. Re:hand? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Actually koans work because there is no such thing as the right answer. What is important is more the way you react to the challenge and present your answer and not so much what the answer you come up with is. And an experienced teacher will be able to differentiate between immediate and learned answers

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    13. Re:hand? by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1

      Depends on if it is dead or alive, I suppose.

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Maybe it's good... by andyring · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if our emotions are affected by what we cannot hear, maybe it's a blessing in disguise that my new car stereo got ripped off on Sunday (from the church parking lot during service, nonetheless, bastards.....)

    1. Re:Maybe it's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those dirty heathen Arabs! lets bomb them I say!!

    2. Re:Maybe it's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it's pretty clear God hates you. Sorry.

    3. Re:Maybe it's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lemme guess, overland park?

    4. Re:Maybe it's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the car itself did not get stolen (happened at my church, to a traveller from Australia who had his luggage, including passport, in the trunk)

    5. Re:Maybe it's good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You`ve been bombing them for 40 years. Why else do you think they're so pissed off at you? Because they envy you? Yeah, right.

    6. Re:Maybe it's good... by rem1313 · · Score: 1

      next on slashdot - tasteless food!

    7. Re:Maybe it's good... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you let the collection plate pass one too many times.

      --
      Huh?
    8. Re:Maybe it's good... by punchdrunk · · Score: 1
      maybe it's a blessing in disguise that my new car stereo got ripped off on Sunday (from the church parking lot during service, nonetheless, bastards.....)

      Pretty common actually. Think about it. You know everyone who parks there ain't coming out for at least an hour. It's not that uncommon to have a number of cars broken into all in a row in a church lot. (No I am not a stereo thief, just someone who's grown up going to lots of different churches.)

    9. Re:Maybe it's good... by frozenray · · Score: 1

      > next on slashdot - tasteless food!

      Since when is airline "food" supposed to be "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."?

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    10. Re:Maybe it's good... by nullgel · · Score: 1
      *sigh*

      I feel your pain. Believe me. It just happened to me as well.

      http://www.nullgel.com/_temp/thugs1.JPG

      http://www.nullgel.com/_temp/thugs2.JPG

      This happened during the day, while I was working. Very scary too, since I work for the DoD contractor Raytheon in a supposeded secure parking lot surronded by a barbed wire fence. But they messed up by hitting the car of an engineer. My anti-personnel car security system should be operational in the next month.

      I hope they try again...

    11. Re:Maybe it's good... by Jettra · · Score: 1

      It's already out there. I believe they named it Tofu.

    12. Re:Maybe it's good... by spektr · · Score: 1

      Well, if our emotions are affected by what we cannot hear, maybe it's a blessing in disguise that my new car stereo got ripped off on Sunday (from the church parking lot during service, nonetheless, bastards.....)

      Don't fool yourself. Your mood already IS affected by something you can't hear (anymore).

    13. Re:Maybe it's good... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      My anti-personnel car security system should be operational in the next month.

      How many extra batteries do you have in there now, and how big is the capacitor you're using?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    14. Re:Maybe it's good... by nullgel · · Score: 1
      Hmm... That beats my silly napalm cannon idea.

      Who am I kidding. I'll probably settle for razor blades on the back of the deck.

    15. Re:Maybe it's good... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      I'll probably settle for razor blades on the back of the deck.

      Nah, you'll just risk hurting yourself. Go for the battery and capacitor idea. Hook it up so that it'll only nail somebody who actually tries to remove the radio. Also, make sure you have some other device in the car that would require power from those extra batteries so that when the homicide investigators inquire about their purpose, you have a good defense. Then sound thankful that you never tried to remove the radio yourself. :-)

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    16. Re:Maybe it's good... by nullgel · · Score: 1
      Also, make sure you have some other device in the car that would require power from those extra batteries...

      Easy. Eight 15" woofers need 1.21 gigawatts. Oh wait...

  4. Less sensational title: by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The effects of powerful but inaudible vibrations on the human body and nervous system...

    Hell, I bet you could even make their ears bleed if you juice it up enough.

    1. Re:Less sensational title: by xaxat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, the concept of inaudible is important here because while individuals may not be able to ackowldge hearing certain souds, that does not mean that it does not have an effect.

      I can not see if ultraviolet, but it has an effect on my body.

    2. Re:Less sensational title: by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      Or, even more interesting, attempting to cause orgasms!

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    3. Re:Less sensational title: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It even has an effect on your vision. The blur that comes from your eyes' inability to focus near-ultraviolet is perceived, even consciously. Without it a bright light source would still look glary, but in a slightly different way.

      This is why reproduction media never really reproduce - you can imply the presence of, say, a big bright explosion, but you certainly can't simulate it. I laugh (ha! I say) at people who claim "96kHz is way more than enough to reproduce anything you can hear" or some such. Sensation and perception don't work like that.

    4. Re:Less sensational title: by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Generally people found that they experienced more in depth versions of the emotions they were feeling before the infrasound began."

      Surgeon General's Warning: Do not take Viagra while listening to infrasound.

  5. Does it also apply to... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

    .. sounds we block out ourselves?

    It would go a long way to explaining why talking to my mother still pains me, even after I drone her out..

  6. New Present by cranos · · Score: 1

    Gotta remember to get one of those cannon thingies for next valentines day. Turn it on at just the right time and whammo. ;)

    1. Re:New Present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then what, hope that your hand gives you a big kiss?

    2. Re:New Present by trmj · · Score: 1

      From the artice:

      "a 12m-long, 30cmwide drainpipe cannon"

      From the post:

      "get one of those cannon thingies for next valentines day"

      Hmm... you wouldn't be compensating for something, would you?

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    3. Re:New Present by cranos · · Score: 1

      No comment

  7. A lil something in the food, maybe... by citking · · Score: 3, Funny
    Those feeling uncomfortable when the concert began, found their mood turning to anger.

    Some physical affects were also experienced, including tingling in the back of the neck and a strange feeling in the stomach.

    Is it just me, or do you get the feeling that the pre-concert banquet might've been contaminated with something?

    --
    "This food is problematic."
    1. Re:A lil something in the food, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, perhaps Hoffman would have been proud, or perhaps Alexander Shuglin?

  8. IG-nobel Prize for sure! by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    I nominate them for an ig-nobel prize

    --

    1. Re:IG-nobel Prize for sure! by gaeamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You sound rather dismissive. Why would this be fundamentally different than the effects of ultrasound? That can be used to achieve diagnostic imaging and therapeutic effects on soft tissues.

      Why would other physical effects for infrasound be so unbelievable/preposterous/trivial?

      Considering their mention of a possible rational cause for "haunted" emotional states, I'd say that they're working from a good perspective; and the potential could be very lucrative, scientifically speaking, but potentially nasty, commercially--imagine a little joy-inducing infrasonic emitter either in honeymoon suites at a major hotel chain ("Oh, BABY!!! Best sex EVER!!!"), or on shopping carts, set to go off when a customer pauses in a given aisle in the supermarket, "driving up sales" (indeed!). You might just go cuckoo for Cocao Puffs

      G.

      Playing Dungeons and Dragons games on the computer sort of compounds the dorkiness, compressing it, and shaping it into a monument that gets beaten up at lunch. --Tycho, www.penny-arcade.com

    2. Re:IG-nobel Prize for sure! by trezor · · Score: 1

      I'd still go for weed, though. Now that's natural :)

      And you want sales up? Stoners can help!

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  9. Paul Simon Reigns Supreme? by Sagarian · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Sound of Silence, indeed.

    1. Re:Paul Simon Reigns Supreme? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      I heard the album was golden

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    2. Re:Paul Simon Reigns Supreme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the imitating-paul-simon dept.

      We'll be charitable and assume you were subliminally affected. ;)

    3. Re:Paul Simon Reigns Supreme? by Sagarian · · Score: 1

      Damn, missed the original subtitle. Musta been too obvious. Apologies. Damn!

    4. Re:Paul Simon Reigns Supreme? by Plug · · Score: 1

      The song is called "The Sounds of Silence", and refers to the little things that you hear when it's 'silent', but of course it isn't really.

  10. Re:Noise i can't hear? by spencerogden · · Score: 1

    Maybe she wouldn't get so mad if you spelled fiance correctly.

  11. Standing waves.. by jasno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if the individual experiences were determined by the location in which the listener sat. It would seem that standing waves could form, with some people getting blasted, while others feel nothing.

    Not a very technical article, but interesting nonetheless.

    Practice makes rejects

    --

    http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    1. Re:Standing waves.. by racermd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As the other reply mentions, you'll need parallel walls for standing waves to form. In addition, the wavelength is sufficiently large enough that everyone would have *some* experience.

      As a practical experiment, you can try to get the same results by using a fairly large, consumer-available subwoofer in a small room. Mute any "main" speakers and play some sine-wave sweeps. No matter where you go in the room, you'll be able to hear the sound. However, due to the parallel walls, you're going to experience some standing waves in the room. This is most observable when you place the subwoofer near one corner of the room and you stand in the opposite corner.

      It's interesting to note that when you place a loudspeaker closer to walls the low-frequency response seems to be more pronounced at the expense of spatial diffusion or "openness" in the higher frequencies (the sound seems to come from a point on the speaker rather than being more diffused around the speaker). That's why you should experiment with the placement of your own speakers so that you get the right sound from your system.

      And isn't the military using something similar to this to achieve similar results? IIRC, the US military is experimenting with ultrasonic waves to induce pain and nausia for the purposes of non-lethal immobilization of an opponent. Maybe it was some radio frequencies. I don't exactly remember, and it's way too past my bedtime to go looking. Pretty cool all the way around, though.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    2. Re:Standing waves.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Standing waves.. by rabidcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the other reply mentions, you'll need parallel walls for standing waves to form. In addition, the wavelength is sufficiently large enough that everyone would have *some* experience.

      If you get a standing wave, there will be silent spots regardless of the wavelength. Now, if the wavelength is greater than twice the size of the room (depending on where the speaker is) you have no chance of getting a standing wave, but that's another matter.

    4. Re:Standing waves.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you need parallel walls to get standing waves, then it explains why they chose the Metropolitan cathedral instead of the Anglican - the Metropolitan cathedral is one big circular chamber.

    5. Re:Standing waves.. by XNormal · · Score: 1

      As the other reply mentions, you'll need parallel walls for standing waves to form

      The only cavity that will not have standing waves is one with walls that completely absorb sound. Any reflection will create some kind of standing wave. It's true that a cavity with a complex shape is far less likely to have such deep nulls or as many nulls as a cavity with parallel walls. In cavities with parallel walls standing waves are governed by a simple set of equations. Other shapes may require numerical analysis to find their resonant modes.

      This bulb shape definitely doesn't have parallel walls. It was designed using numeric optimization of differential equations. It is capable of creating standing waves of such high amplitude that they go way into the nonlinear acoustic zone and can be used as a pump with almost no moving parts.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    6. Re:Standing waves.. by rabtech · · Score: 1

      It is a well known effect in the audio world... for every surface that a subwoofer is in close proximity to, the effective level of sound from the subwoofer at that frequency is increased by 3db.

      Placing a subwoofer in the corner of the room will result in a 6db increase, because it is in close proximity to two additional hard surfaces.

      The math behind this is very complicated, and it is only effective for larger waves (hence bass frequencies).

      --
      Natural != (nontoxic || beneficial)
  12. Wham!!! by neurostar · · Score: 1

    ...Turn it on at just the right time and whammo. ;)

    I hope you weren't refering to this part of the article: "Those feeling uncomfortable when the concert began, found their mood turning to anger."

    Because then the whammo might be a door slamming, or a back-hand slamming ;)

  13. Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... their emotions (mainly anger) are caused by not being ABLE to hear the sounds.

    Maybe I can get a research grant for taking people and changing their emotions via wavelengths of light that nobody can see.

  14. Sound makes no difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah - this probably explains why my girlfriend's mood changes the same way whether I fart silently or not...

  15. Sixth Column by Kafir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Robert Heinlein's Sixth Column the good guys (defending America against Pan-Asian invaders) use "subsonics" to make people uneasy. That's what this study says "infrasound" (same thing, different name) would do: make people who were already nervous more nervous, without their knowing why.
    I assumed this was already well known science; the other possibility is that Heinlein was uncannily prescient (even for him.)
    Anyone have more background on this?

    1. Re:Sixth Column by DAQ42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, there is a note called the "brown" note. It's a tone that causes humans to lose bowel control (I don't know if this has already been mentioned, I read comments at a level 3 or above rating. Yeah, I'm lazy, fuck you trolls *thwack*). There are also tones that induce vomiting, nasal bleeds, and lung failure, heart failure, and epiliptic seizures in non-eplilectis subjects. It has to do with the tonal resonance on the cells and other such meat space stuff. There are a lot of things that cause sympathetic vibrations in matter. Most people are not aware of this, but if you live in a large city, the feeling you get when you are out away from civilization (like I mean, out there, away from power lines a must), is the lack of the low tonal B vibration caused by the 60 (or 50, or 47, or 78, depending on your country of origin) in the air. Electricity flowing through power lines in power grids causes a tonal vibration that can actually be measured by human senses. You can actually feel the difference.
      As an anecdotal reference, I was travelling cross counrty (USA), and was out in the desert (no power lines within several score miles). It was peaceful. It was quiet. My senses felt jazzed and alive, mainly because they weren't constantly being bombarded by that 60 cycle hum of electrics around me.
      Anyway.
      So natch.

      --
      Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
    2. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to offer anecdotal counter-evidence, the feeling I get in the Wilderness areas of Colorado is about the same as I get in a backyard of Oahu, Hawaii (behind a house with electricity). There's simply too many sensory differences between urban landscapes and less-urban to say all the differences in near-subconscious feeling you experience are electromagnetic in nature.

    3. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting? How about funny, it's a south park reference for crying out loud, that should be a clue.

    4. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

      No, this has been common knowledge (or at least theory) for years and years. The US Army experimented with sonic weapons, i think Frank Herbert might've mentioned them in Dune (and if not, David Lynch sure did in the movie)... i even remember reading a really old Enid Blyton book... Secret Seven? Or maybe it was the Hardy Boys... Definitely one of those kid's mystery books the Bad Guy was using ultra-low-frequency organ playing to make people feel uncomfortable and think a house was haunted. Hell it could've been Scooby Doo even, it was years ago. I always thought everyone knew about this kind of stuff? God knows there have been plenty of new age "gurus" who have taken advantage of it by releasing CDs full of "uplifting" one-finger-synth-chords.

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    5. Re:Sixth Column by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      I hate it when that happens - I mentioned this book to a friend just the other day in relation to a subsonic story line in a TV series, and now it comes up again, in a freaky way.

      Anyway, I know the book you mean (I must have read it about 20 years ago) - it was one of The Three Investigators books - I just did a brief google based on the fact that I remembered the clever kid's name was Jupiter, and that they had an HQ in the middle of a junkyard. Judging from this page it was "The Secret of Terror Castle".

      Ah, that takes me back... :-)

      Tim

    6. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

      Thankyou! You rock :-) Damn i read all of those. Nancy Drew, Hardy Boys, Three Investigators, all the Enid Blyton ones... before i discovered sci-fi and that was the end of it heh

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    7. Re:Sixth Column by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      I don't rock that much - if I did, I would have read the rest of these comments and noted that others have mentioned the same book by name a couple of times already, just further down the page :-)

      Tim

    8. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..."brown" note... causes humans to lose bowel control... tones that induce vomiting, nasal bleeds, and lung failure, heart failure, and epiliptic seizures... has to do with the tonal resonance on the cells and other such meat space stuff... Most people are not aware of this [you mean there might be someone other than you who is aware of this? O Lordy I hope not!]... lack of the low tonal B vibration

      Hey dood, what kinda stuff you been smokin'? That must be some powerful weed!

      And despite the psychedelics, you managed to type all that in with only one or two typos! Wow, you the man!

      Sure do wish the moderators were a leetle more discriminating though. You deserve high marks for "funny" but zilch for "informative" or "insightful".

    9. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing, there really is a term "brown noise" (not "note" though). It's actually named after Brownian motion, because the power spectrum sort of resembles it. It's similar to white noise, pink noise etc in terms of how it actually sounds. And no, it doesn't make you shit or get off the pot. ;)

    10. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read comments at a level 3 or above rating. Yeah, I'm lazy, fuck you trolls *thwack*).

      How anyone can manage even at +3 I do not know. I browse at +4 and even that gets annoying pretty quickly.

      I remember when there used to be like 20 post at +2 on a normal front page story, all worth reading. Nowadays it is quite common to have stories with 50+ comments rated +4 or above. Noise >> signal here at Slashdot; business as usual.

    11. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,

      I remember from New Scientist in the UK many years age (early 70's) some guy made a 7Hz oversized "French Police Whistle" with a 1Kw motor, he ran it for less than a second and ended up in a wheelchair due to internal organ resonances.

    12. Re:Sixth Column by TheMidget · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How anyone can manage even at +3 I do not know. I browse at +4 and even that gets annoying pretty quickly.

      ... and, as grand-parent post shows, even at +5 you are still not safe from being trolled...

    13. Re:Sixth Column by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can confirm this. There was some infamous demo at a conference where someone showed that the resonant frequency of the average anal sphincter muscle was around 37 Hertz. At a high enough acoustic output level, you could cause involuntary resonance of that muscle. So, when I worked for Leslie Speakers in the late 60's, we had a lab room with excellent bass speakers that could put out serious acoustic energy in the 20 to 50 Hertz range. I set up an HP audio oscillator driving something like a 250 watt RMS power amp driving a massive bass speaker in an enclosure, then parked my butt in front of the speaker and with the amp turned up, swept through frequencies. I could feel various internal organs, though very acoustically damped by their internal surroundings, kind of resonantly responding in certain ranges. My guts felt really strange at some frequencies and I could feel unpleasant sensations in my kidneys, and definitely the small intestine. But getting to the point, I found you can get the sphincter to resonate as claimed. I did not carry things too far, as I was afraid of damaging myself internally. By the way, you will NOT get this kind of acoustic wattage out of a home stereo and home speakers. Oh, and you'll never see McGuyver doing this..

    14. Re:Sixth Column by sootman · · Score: 1

      I saw a really interesting documentary about the brown noise once. A camera crew followed these four kids from Colorado who went on a trip to play music and...

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    15. Re:Sixth Column by thevoice · · Score: 1

      I believe the frequency needed to cause humans to lose bowel control is somewhere around 14 hz. It helps if it is of a high amplitude.

      It, perhaps, could be said, that there is no good excuse for knowing this...

    16. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is complete BS.

      "You're right Osborne! People will believe anything!"

      Gravity will always get you down.

    17. Re:Sixth Column by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electricity flowing through power lines in power grids causes a tonal vibration that can actually be measured by human senses. You can actually feel the difference.

      Uhhh...no. Yes the AC power generates a wave at 60Hz. It's a common problem in analog to digital conversion when you need sensitive measurements. You have to make sure to exclude that data from the wall. But that wave is ELECTROMAGNETIC. If our senses could pick it up, we would see it, not hear it.

      Why would we go to all the trouble of building speakers if all we needed to do was put AC through a wire to make sound?

      Here's an experiment for you: get a tuning fork that resonates at 60Hz. Give it a smack. Hear that? 60Hz is well within the audible hearing range. Now let's say you are right; why does the AC sound act on us subconsciously if it's just a tone at 60?

    18. Re:Sixth Column by dacarr · · Score: 1

      I would concur with the lack of power lines eliminating the ambient 60 Hz tone. To demonstrate this, go out to a remote area where there are a lot of power lines and just listen. You'll hear it.

      --
      This sig no verb.
  16. First subliminal messages... by Rtech · · Score: 1

    Now infrasound messages. Only... would a tinfoil hat work against these sounds, or just amplify them?

    1. Re:First subliminal messages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For this you need the full Cone of Silence, I'm afraid. But never fear - well actually ALWAYS fear, naturally, but anyway they're only $99.95 from the paranoia shopping network. Get on the shoe and order yours today!

  17. No Control Group? by Fly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be an interesting experiment if they had a control group. The end of the story mentions some things they want to try, but if there was any type of control group, I didn't see it mentioned in the story.

    --
    end of line
    1. Re:No Control Group? by m3000 · · Score: 1

      I was also wondering this. Where is the group of people who heard the concert, but had no infrasound being blasted out at them? From just reading the reactions, it seems like all of their symptoms could have just been caused by the audible music.

    2. Re:No Control Group? by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

      The experiment mentions two conserts on the same day and infrasound being switched on and off at intervals during the concert. It's a while since I had to do any stats but that'd provide data for within groups and between groups measures wouldn't it?

    3. Re:No Control Group? by Fly · · Score: 1

      If the infrasounds were switched at different times, that might provide interesting additional data. However, the article did not say that, AND it still would not be an actual control group. The control group must not experience the modified input at all.

      --
      end of line
  18. Speaker by WaaX · · Score: 1
    The infrasound vibrations were created by an ultra-low loudspeaker inside a 12m-long, 30cmwide drainpipe cannon
    I wish they have more details about that. My neighboor would love it!
  19. I thought science content was going to be withheld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so terrorists couldn't use the information against us.

    I'd rather see a crazy person running at me with a grenade than blasting me with music I can't hear that makes me mad.

  20. old hat... by jarn · · Score: 1

    Surely this has been known about for over a half century. One of Robert Heinlein's earliest novels, Sixth Column/The day after tomorrow contains examples of using subliminal music to frighten the occupying forces.

  21. Hmmmm... by meme_police · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...when I feel the walls shake to the beat of some faraway b-boy with boom boom speakers filling up the back seat of their lame import I feel nothing but anger.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

    1. Re:Hmmmm... by DavittJPotter · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't discriminate so blindly!

      Domestic cars have subwoofers too.

      --
      "If there's hope, it lies in the proles..."
  22. Gas up the Mystery Machine, Scoob! by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Some scientists also claim it is the cause of the uneasy feelings and changes of emotion experienced in places believed to be haunted.

    Mr O'Keefe added: "When places affect people physically and they aren't able to explain it, they often attribute their feelings to being near a ghost."

    And I would've gotten away with it, if it wasn't for you meddling kids!

  23. Sound by jmulvey · · Score: 2, Funny
    "They showed the audience's emotions intensified as the inaudible sound vibrations, too low for the human ear to perceive, were blasted out during a 50-minute piano recital... Some physical affects were also experienced, including tingling in the back of the neck and a strange feeling in the stomach."

    Inanimate objects were also strangely affected by jumping off countertops, showing their incredible, pitiful anguish for the music's deep feelings. Buildings showed their emotion by creating cracks in their foundations, no doubt in sympathy for the bifircated feelings expressed in song.

  24. In other news... by silvaran · · Score: 1

    An arbitrary experiment in contentless websites has revealed how people's emotions are unaffected by websites they cannot see...

    Wait for it.... ah... slashdotted.

    1. Re:In other news... by trmj · · Score: 1

      slashdotted, 56k modem, what's the differece? takes about the same time to load.

      Yeah. There's absolutely NOTHING available. Not even 1-way cable. Anybody got an (affordale) apartment for rent?

      --
      Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  25. Re:Noise i can't hear? by Flamerule · · Score: 1

    Jesus Christ. She's a girl, so it's fiancée.

  26. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hell, I bet you could even make their ears bleed if you juice it up enough."

    Most modern music will do that.

    Seriously I wonder if this can be used in psychological warfare? Bombard Saddam with this on a regular basis.

  27. John Cage by FosterSJC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is reminiscent of some of John Cage's avante-garde work. Here is the AMG write-up.
    While his creations did not use inaudible sound explicitly, he is famous for his 4'33", a piece of this length completely silent. I have a friend who saw it "performed" live, and he was apparently quite moved. The pianist sits down at the piano, lifts the key-gaurd, and prepares to play. The performer remains attentive at the keys for 4 minutes and 33 seconds, then finishes and closes the key-guard.
    My friend said he was struck by how open he became to the sounds around him, to the concertgoers. These were things he'd never heard before. And there was an order to it, that was somehow created from all of the audience members intensely focused on eachother.

    1. Re:John Cage by cornjchob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, my favorite work of Johnny Cage was the uppercut when you were on the bridge as a finishing move--bam! A punch to the crotch, and you were lying on your back in 3 foot tall spikes. Now that's a sound you hear over and over.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    2. Re:John Cage by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      Fight Cage, Johnny Fight
      Use your split punch and make 'em cry
      Be tough, shoot your green fire
      The shadow kick, we all admire, is strong
      Fight for your life
      Mortal Kombat at the speed of light
      So beat the bad guys and make 'em sigh
      Johnny Cage is not afraid to die

      (With thanks to Praga Khan)

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    3. Re:John Cage by evel+aka+matt · · Score: 1

      Christ, can we say "karma whoring"?

      Yeah, 4'33" is just like using inaudible sound waves to stir-up emotions. I mean, they're both quiet!

      eam

    4. Re:John Cage by mindriot · · Score: 1

      I wonder what happens with an audience who have heard (no pun intended) about this piece. I mean, once most of the audience know "oh, this must be that famous 4'33'' piece..." then the reactions should be quite different; nevertheless the outcome should be interesting on its own.

    5. Re:John Cage by Graphyx · · Score: 1

      I would like to actively offer my services to play this peice. I am sure that my proformace of this music score will stir your emotions. I take the standard rate of $1500 per peice. Please email me any requests.

  28. could this be related to depression? by jasonrocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scientists have begun analysing the responses of 250 people who took part in the study into the effects of infrasound, carried out at Liverpool's Metropolitan Cathedral last September. They showed the audience's emotions intensified as the inaudible sound vibrations, too low for the human ear to perceive, were blasted out during a 50-minute piano recital.


    This sounds an awful lot like depression, the intensified emotions that is. I know this is a little early to tell, but could these experiments help us understand depression a bit more?
    --

    void
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Brown noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And right in the middle of a Clarinet solo.... "Ppbpbpbppbpbt! ppt. pbbbpbt!" Piles and piles.... Everywhere....

  31. Worse noises you can't hear but ..... by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    changes your mood poll.

    1) The Silent Fart
    2) The Wife/Girlfirend
    3) That sound you *know* Uncle Sam makes as he dips into your pocket
    4) The sound of your carrer flushing down the bowl post bubble.
    5) The sound of my Karma flushing down the bowl after this post.
    6)Cowbow Neal's Silent Farts

  32. that silent pianist dude... by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    Maybe this explains why people like that silent pianist dude so much.

    People would pay good money to see this guy sit down at a piano and NOT play it!

    (Anyone remember his name?)

    1. Re:that silent pianist dude... by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      John Cage

      He "wrote" 4'33"--a song that consisted of a pianist sitting down, act like hes intent on playing for 4 minutes and 33 seconds, and then get up. Crazy shit. Good ol' 7th grade General Music class. I knew it would come in handy somewhere.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    2. Re:that silent pianist dude... by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      cool...thanks dude.

      (I had better things to do in 7th grade...like daydream of getting back home to play Nintendo!)

  33. Re:Noise i can't hear? by EatHam · · Score: 4, Funny

    if you are looking to get rid of the silent treatment, try the following:

    "Oh, the silent treatment? Good. Now I finally have some peace and quiet."

    Guaranteed to put a loud and immediate stop to the silent treatment.

  34. Did this violate copyright? by po_boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if they had to pay royalties to those who have copyrighted silence.

    1. Re:Did this violate copyright? by fatboyslack · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I was going to reference that slashdot article and put in a witty comment. But as a first I decided to first read what other people wrote, then write my witty, easy karma scamming comment. ( a first for /.?) Thanks for nuthin' po boy!
      /sarcasm
      /lame knowledge of hmtl

      --
      Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -- Leo Tolstoy
    2. Re:Did this violate copyright? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, because the two works share absolutely no similarity. In the case of the John Cage piece the pianist makes *no* noise for four minutes and thirtythree seconds, focusing the attention of the audience on the noises they themselves are making. ( And as an aside the piece isn't properly performed unless the pianist enters the hall, sits, opens the keyboard, THEN remains silent, and finishes the piece by closing the keyboard and taking a bow. That is how it is explicitly written)

      In *this* case a piano is playing with a really low bass note underneath. Even deleting the piano a note is still being played, whether you can hear it or not.

      KFG

    3. Re:Did this violate copyright? by po_boy · · Score: 1

      What are you trying to say?

  35. Ack! by RyanFenton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those are the same responses one would expect with any audience coming to attend an experimental performance. Some would slowly get angry as they began to feel that their time had been wasted. Some would feel amused at watching the rest of the audience. Some would feel conspiritorial as they thought they realized the intent of what was happening - most Music 101 courses have a lecture mentioning experiments where a minute of silence is considered a work of art, where the "music" is the audiences reaction itself.

    Don't expect any radical advancements into generalized knowledge about human emotional reaction based on this evidence.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with the fact the study was less than scientific they did mention that the 'silent' sounds were sent out at certain time and the surveys asked how the people felt at certain times during the piece. If a statistically significant portion of the audience had their emotions intensified at the same points as the infrasound I'd say they have a pretty strong case. (or at least enough evidence to get funds for more study)

  36. Slashdot has been doing this for... by MoThugz · · Score: 4, Funny

    quite some time now. How many times have you actually read an OS-specific article and feel a strong urge to either back up comments promoting the stability or other "good" criteria of your OS of choice or lambast arguments mentioned by supporters of other OSs?

    Almost every time? Heh, poor mortals... I bet you never view the source for the particular article now, didn't you? How else can you miss the <EMBED FILE="/sounds/brainwash/BSD_is_dead.wav" TYPE="sound/propaganda-OS_activism">.

    Don't bother checking the pages now... I'm sure the Slashdot gods have now detected my blasphemous post and deleted such references accordingly.

    1. Re:Slashdot has been doing this for... by ry4an · · Score: 1

      Sort of like MRML

  37. bothersome eh? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Those feeling uncomfortable when the concert began, found their mood turning to anger.
    [...]
    During the concert, guests were asked to fill in questionnaires

    I know I tend to get a lil' angry when I'm asked to fill in questionnaires while I'm trying to enjoy a concert...
    ;- )

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  38. old news by Cached+Hit · · Score: 0

    according to this , these guys were'nt the first to address the issue.

    --
    "look ma! no hands!!!" - random amputee
  39. Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already by zazas_mmmm · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is nothing new to listeners of avante garde noise rock.

    John Zorn experimented with high pitched frequencies outside of listeners' auditory range on Krystallnacht. Track 2 has high pitched frequencies that coexist with the sound of breaking glass that cause feelings of anger, pain and nausea. The liner notes discourage repeated listening (I kid you not).

    The Flaming Lips Did this on Zaireeka, their 4-CD (played simultaneously) experiment--wherein they used frequencies lower than the normal auditory range to create feelings of disorientation (funny since the Flaming Lips most pop-oriented songs can do this too).

    I'm sure more examples can be found within the annals of experimental noise rock.

    --
    I'm a friend of a friend of the working class.
    1. Re:Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and the song The Beatles made with the sound that made dogs bark, but we couldn't hear.

    2. Re:Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 1

      Ummm, i'm not sure about that. How many people have stereos that accurately reproduce sounds below 20Hz and above 20KHz? Clearly and without a dire signal-noise ratio? Not Very Many. I doubt many average systems without a subwoofer will even go much below 50Hz, and that's certainly still audible. And the frequency range of CDs stops at 22050Hz = 22KHz, as well as turning into more-or-less square waves by then too.

      It's all very well experimenting with this kind of sound, but it's pretty pointless to record it on to CD. It works best in a live environment where you can afford a sound system that will cleanly and LOUDLY(!) reproduce the full range of frequencies. That way you can also make sure you're controlling the space so as not to hit any resonant frequencies by accident.

      Heh, whenever i played "Chase" by Giorgio Moroder at my old house my keys would rattle on my desk like crazy. Free live percussion :-)

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    3. Re:Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already by knewman · · Score: 1
      "And the frequency range of CDs stops at 22050Hz = 22KHz, as well as turning into more-or-less square waves by then too."
      The frequency range of CD's is actually a bit lower than that, due to analog anti-aliasing filters used before the A/D conversion. If any frequencies above the Nyquist frequency (22050Hz for CDs) get to the A/D convertor, they get converted falsely at a frequency that much *lower* than the Nyquist frequency. Which sounds horrific. So most A/D conversion chains have hefty brick wall analog filters to knock out any frequencies above about 20kHz, just to be safe.

      Those analog filters cause phase shifting in the nearby upper frequencies. This is why higher sampling rates make music sound better in spite of Nyquist. At a 96kHz sampling frequency, those analog filters can be more gradual and at a less audible frequency (about an octave higher) so that the phase shifting is at inaudible frequencies.

    4. Re:Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already by rcs1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have MP3s of these, and haven't noticed a thing. ;-)

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    5. Re:Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also,
      Pootie Tang "Sine Your Pitty on the Runny Kine"
      Sah dah tay!

  40. This could just as easily been called. . . by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    How people are effected by the sound of tectonic plates moving, or how people are effected by the sound made by giant crickets from Mars ( which might well be good to know come the invasion)

    Are you ready to Ruuuuuuuuummmmmmmble?

    It's certainly no secret that people are effected by really, really low bass notes. As the article itself notes church organs have been using this trick to spice up the "Glory Hallelujahs" for centuries.

    The part that's interesting is that seems to be a mood *enhancer*, rather producing any specific effect, so if the power of the Lord is already moving you that organ is going to move you more.

    Let's hear it for the Church and gut level empiricism.

    Don't install one of these "sub-sub-woofers" if you have pissy neighbors though. It reminds of the Bill Cosby joke about cocaine:

    "It enhances my personality"

    "Yeah, but what if you're an asshole?"

    KFG

    1. Re:This could just as easily been called. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reminds of the Bill Cosby joke about cocaine:

      "It enhances my personality"

      "Yeah, but what if you're an asshole?"


      Somehow, I doubt this is an exact quote...

      Primarily because Bill Cosby is well known for avoiding the use of anything resembling explitives in his comedy; he believes that the use of such language is the mark of a comedian whom must rely on the 'shock' value to get a laugh out of the crowd... Meaning that foul language in comedy is the mark of a poor craftsman.

    2. Re:This could just as easily been called. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The asshole part is correct, though the tape we have of the routine has Cosby saying "Yes" instead of "Yeah". FWIW, I think that was the only expletive in the act...

    3. Re:This could just as easily been called. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

      Bill Cosby:Himself.

      Rent it.

      KFG

  41. Sonny Bono strikes again by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cage's estate actually won a lawsuit over the copyright on this work. Apparently, the estate now has a legal precedent on owning all musical works composed entirely of rests.


    Sonny Bono is the personification of counter-productive copyright law.
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Sonny Bono strikes again by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did not win a lawsuit. The parties reached agreement without litigation, both sides, in fact ( as is often the case in such matters), claiming victory.

      If Mr. Bat had not explicitly given partial author's credit to Mr. Cage on the album the whole thing would likely never have come up in the first place.

      What seems to have ticked off Cage's heirs is the implication that Mr. Bat and Mr. Cage had collaborated on the piece and was thus trading on his reputation without authority.

      *Not* that he had simply recorded a silent piece.

      KFG

    2. Re:Sonny Bono strikes again by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the estate now has a legal precedent on owning all musical works composed entirely of rests.

      Nope.

      The precedent only applies to works for which it is claimed that Cage was a composer of.

      Mike Batt used "Batt/Cage" as the composer credit for his work, which was a cuter little joke that ended up costing him six figures. If he hadn't made any claims that his work was based on Cage's, he wouldn't have had to pay.

  42. Oh that's nothing... by Nix0n · · Score: 1

    A bizarre experiment in soundless music has revealed how people's emotions are affected by noises they cannot hear...

    No big deal.

    My girlfriend's emotions are affected by things I never said.

  43. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by EatHam · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It can be used as non-lethal technology...
    By using very low frequency electromagnetic radiation -- the waves way below radio frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum -- he [Eldon Byrd] found he could induce the brain to release behavior-regulating chemicals. "We could put animals into a stupor," he says by hitting them with these frequencies. "We got chick brains -- in vitro -- to dump 80 percent of the natural opioids in their brains,'"Byrd says. He even ran a small project that used magnetic fields to cause certain brain cells in rats to release histamine. In humans, this would cause instant flulike symptoms and produce nausea. "These fields were extremely weak. They were undetectable," says Byrd. "The effects were nonlethal and reversible. You could disable a person temporarily," Byrd hypothesizes. "It [would have been] like a stun gun."
    Ripped off from here
  44. 4'33" by akiy · · Score: 1

    John Cage had this already in his piece 4'33"...

    --

    --
    http://www.aikiweb.com - AikiWeb Aikido Information

  45. Parallel walls? by pompomtom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Standing waves are created by parallel reflecting surfaces.

    Gakk... site is now /.ed, and I didn't note the site of the experiment, but I can't imagine you'd test this in a place likely to be effected by standing waves.

    --

    Buckets,

    pompomtom

    "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
    1. Re:Parallel walls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      besides, at the frequencies they are talking about, the wavelength would be well over 80 feet, so the resonating zone distance whatever thing would have to be really big, or else outside.

    2. Re:Parallel walls? by Forgotten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but there's still always an interaction between the sound source and the environment. That applies both to the infrasound and the piano piece. The sound bounces around off walls and furniture and people, interferes with itself, beats, gets absorbed, gets concentrated, gets funky...the point being that even in a standard recital, no two people are exposed to the same aural experience because they're necessarily sitting in different places. It starts to get a bit Heisenbergian the more you think about it. And it's even more mixed-up with multiple sound sources.

      This is why a live concert will always have value, no matter the fidelity of recording and reproduction. Even if you really could reproduce the sound at a location (which you can't), it'd just be the sweet spot chosen by the sound engineer.

      No substitute for being there.

    3. Re:Parallel walls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google for "Wave Field Synthesis".

  46. In other news by dubiousmike · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just bought an HDTV set that doesn't show an HDTV picture.
    It makes me feel pissed...

  47. deaf people fighting... by scubacuda · · Score: 5, Funny
    this will probably get trolled down...

    But oddly, this (for whatever friggin' reason) reminded me of a deaf couple I once saw fighting. The guy got really angry and closed his eyes. The lady was SO FURIOUS that he wasn't "listening" to her that she tried to PRY the other guy's eyes open with her fingers! What I wouldn't have given to know what they were talking about!

    (Am I a bastard for laughing HARDER b/c I knew that they couldn't hear me?)

    1. Re:deaf people fighting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but its still freakin' hilarious

    2. Re:deaf people fighting... by Forgotten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are a bastard, naturally, but I still appreciate the anecdote. Deaf culture is pretty interesting. Hearing folk might do the same thing if one partner put their hands over their ears and went "nyah nyah nyah not listening". ;)

      Lately I've been watching Sue Thomas, F.B. Eye. That's gotta be the only thing that could have ever got me to watch PAX TV...but it totally kicks ass, taking me off guard with some new understated observation on Deaf life every week. The people in the article need to do some experiments looking at the effects of infrasound on deaf people's emotional state now.

    3. Re:deaf people fighting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a deaf friend who goes to raves and dance clubs pretty frequently. He can feel the intense sound vibrations, despite not being able to hear them. All that, combined with the light effects and drugs, adds up to what seems like a pretty interesting sensory experience.

  48. Darwinian? by jun270 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps this response is similar to the primitive "fight or flight" response. Natural sources of these "infrasounds" include "earthquakes, severe weather, volcanic activity, geomagnetic activity, ocean waves, avalanches, turbulence aloft, and meteors and by some man-made sources such as aircraft and explosions" according to this site: http://www.etl.noaa.gov/et1/infrasound/

  49. Just so long as you're not a chicken... by cosyne · · Score: 3, Funny

    "True story: 7 Hz is the resonant frequency of a chicken's skull cavity. This was determined empirically in Australia, where a new factory generating 7-Hz tones was located too close to a chicken ranch: When the factory started up, all the chickens died.

    From Borland's Turbo C Reference Guide..."

    The internet says it's true, and that's good enough for me.

    1. Re:Just so long as you're not a chicken... by Forgotten · · Score: 2

      It's not just for chickens any more - 7 Hz has been urban legendised in a lot of different forms. 7 is a number that gets a lot of that, of course. It would be an interesting coincidence if the same resonance were lethal to both chickens and studio musicians.

      TAFKAC has it as false, but without a full explanation. Not that it really needs one.

      But hey, don't take my word for it - you can pretty easily create a 7 Hz pattern just by tapping your finger on something thumpy. If this is your last post, we'll know it really is dangerous to people. If instead you post from KFC, well, good for you. Personally I'm vegetarian so I'll hold back on risking any poultricide...just in case.

    2. Re:Just so long as you're not a chicken... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      True story: 7 Hz is the resonant frequency of a chicken's skull cavity.

      Unlikely.

      But it IS in the range of entrainment frequencies of neurons.

      Nerves (especially sensory nerves, which have receptors for non-other-nerve-pulse stimulous), after being fired, go through a series of steps during recovery:

      - Absolute refractory period, where nothing can fire them.

      - Negative afterpotential, where they can be fired by a stronger-than-normal stimulus.

      - Postiive afterpotential, where they can be fired by a WEAKER-than-normal stimulus.

      Followed by a return to the resting state.

      The ramp from refractory to negative to positive afterpotential serves to encode the strength of a continuous stimulus into pulse-train frequency.

      But if you hit it with a periodic pulse of stimulus, so that every nerve of the particular type that fired on one pulse will be in the middle of the positive afterpotential at the next pulse, you can quickly get all of 'em firing in unison on every pulse.

      This is particularly interesting when done with a strobe light. It occurs near the flicker-fusion frequency (around 14 hz, I think). The visual field (even portions only lightly illuminated by the strobe and stroingly with other light sources) tends to disolve into flickering saturated colors, something like a psychedelic poster.

      DON'T try this if you're susceptable to epileptic seizures. (Lightshow operators know the frequency in question and avoid it for fear of injuring the viewers.)

      It's not unreasonable to believe that this effect, working on the nerves controlling the skeletal muscles, breathing muscles, intestinal tract, or the heart, could cause severe medical problems very quickly. (A similar phenomenon may occur with certain muscles, too.)

      The signal would have to be reasonably strong, however. If it could be triggered with a weak signal it would have evolved out quickly or defenses evolved, and if it could be triggered with a moderate signal there would be organisms using it as a weapon.

      And of course different frequencies (over a narrow range) might affect different organ systems.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  50. so that's why the bass helps the acid trip so much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just love the nice bass beats when I'm trippin'

  51. Question by Zelet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If cows "moo" and ducks "quack" what do monkeys do? Why don't we have a word for their sound? If we do what is it? It has been driving me nuts all night.

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    1. Re:Question by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      I thought it was just "ooh ah ah ah", you know, in that screeching monkey type voice.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks man, as if insomnia isn't bad enough I'll be thinking about monkey noises....and how to profit from them...

    3. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They gobble. Didn't you learn anything in school?

    4. Re:Question by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      They "screech", I believe.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    5. Re:Question by scubacuda · · Score: 1
      I don't know what sound they make, but I do know that a group of monkeys is called a "troop" or a "cartload."

      Other animal group names include:

      pariament of owls
      shrewdness of apes
      and
      raft of otters.

    6. Re:Question by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Howler monkeys scream like banshees. You can hear them from their small cage most of the way across the Seattle Zoo. Other monkeys' noises sort of pale in comparison.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    7. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old Macs have a Monkey sound (possibly in the default Scrapbook file?). It's kind of a screechy "eep!". But not a Wild Eep.

    8. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      monkeys chatter

  52. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by Snoopy77 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Seriously I wonder if this can be used in psychological warfare? Bombard Saddam with this on a regular basis.

    Why bombard him with soundless music when we can bombard him with tasteless music. 24/7 of N-Sync should pound him into submission.

    --
    "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
  53. It's been done before by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

    Simon and Garfunkle tried it before, but it took Pootie Tang to make it work...

    --
    Fnord.
    1. Re:It's been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, this has been known for a long time. Back in the early days of cinema, directors used to use "subliminal" pitches to control the emotions of the audience. This was actually outlawed. After that, the film-making industry started using natural sounds which had those inaudible pitches in them, which is what the high-pitched strings in Alfred Hitchcock thrillers were a product of, and this is still common practice today.

      Also, when CDs came out, there was much ado in the professional acoustics world about the fact that these inaudible frequencies were neglected - in part why CDs took 15 years to actually gain any popularity.

      Pete

  54. Overkill rulez by Compuser · · Score: 1

    This just proves my belief that whenever you think
    you need to be within certain limits, you need to
    design about an order of magnitude beyond them.
    So is there some music recording equipment that
    goes from tens of millihertz to a megahertz?
    How difficult would it be to make one?

    1. Re:Overkill rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Short answer: no.

      Long answer: It would take many different kinds of sensors and something to combine all of them together at the end to record something on that order. And lets not even talk about playing it back... sub, woofer, mid, and tweeter aren't going to cut it at all. Although... i wonder if you could take some sort of huge membrane with known resonances, (or several of them) and use incredibly accurate, high speed laser distancers to detect the vibrations going through it at millions of hertz. Even then, you would have problems sampling because you have to sample at twice the rate you want to reproduce at (That's old man Nyquest for you) and there simply aren't electronics that can process that in real time, digitally. But if you have to, it could be done. Your microphone would just be the size of a semi.

    2. Re:Overkill rulez by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Thing is, I am a scientist who has done a lot of
      research involving vibration studies. So as far as
      low freq. part is concerned you can certainly do
      it, you just need to find all resonant frequencies
      of your concert hall, figure out where to place
      your accelerometers and measure away. It's the high
      frequencies that I wonder about. How do you handle
      directional sound?
      So assuming the last question has a well-understood
      answer, the real question is: who has setups like
      these? Anyone? Does anyone sell stuff like that?
      I know that whenever a serious music hall is being
      built they call in acoustic engineers. Is any
      hall built to record a fuller frequency range?

  55. How does this reply affect your mood??? by w3svc_animal · · Score: 5, Funny

    .

    --

    Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

    1. Re:How does this reply affect your mood??? by scubacuda · · Score: 1


      emotionally bereft

    2. Re:How does this reply affect your mood??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must...kill...parent...poster...

    3. Re:How does this reply affect your mood??? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > .

      No, it has to be louder than that.

      .

  56. old idea by glsunder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A decade ago, when I was into speaker design as a hobbiest, I remember reading about subsonic sounds having an effect on people in an audio book or journal. IIRC, they talked about at least one experiment. Basically, it found that people felt uneasy when exposed to low frequency sound and suggested that some old drafty castle halls and rooms that had a reputation for being haunted could designs that caused inaudible low frequency standing waves. My memory's a bit hazy (hey, it's been 10 years), but I'm pretty sure that some researches found a couple of places where that was the case.

  57. exploding chickens? by prockcore · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that urban legend about chickens heads exploding because of a near by factory that generated an inaudible 7khz tone which resonated perfectly on a chicken's skull?

    Wonder if that's what these scientists originally set out to debunk :)

  58. What I want to know... by thetelepath · · Score: 1

    is if the people would've reacted the same way if absolutely nothing was played at all, just sitting there. I'm sure some of them might've still gotten angry after figuring out they just wasted an hour listening to genuine silence. :)

    --
    Because it's about grace. It really is about grace.
  59. I believe it... by J-Piddy · · Score: 1

    I mean, I don't hear my bank account growing, I don't hear any nice young women calling me, and I don't hear anybody respecting my opinions.

    And strangely enough, that makes me feel down.

  60. If you a deaf by Uart · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    then all music is soundless...

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    1. Re:If you a deaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of deaf people enjoy music, experienced tactiley. Is it "soundless"? A matter of semantics - and really, who cares?

    2. Re:If you a deaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your moderation sucks, If i could i'd metamoderate you out of existence. offtopic no; If you wanted to mark this one down, i would have went with flamebait. Maybe troll.

  61. mp3 question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The MP3 format is lossy (you loose parts of the sound (particularly the parts you can't "hear"), at the advantage of a much smaller file). Would such an encoding cause this effect to not work?

    thanks

    1. Re:mp3 question by majestynine · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes, it would.

      All mp3 encoders have a high and low pass filter to cut off frequencies outside the range of normal human ears. Even if you disabled this, you'd still need special 'low loudspeakers' that are capable of generating tones that low anyway. (most consumer subwoofers will do down to about 30hz)

      So in other words, this won't be a new addition to your home theatre any time soon. (Although an 'emotion' woofer would be really cool on some movies ;) )

  62. Heh by IanBevan · · Score: 1

    emotions are affected by noises they cannot hear...

    My emotions are affected by cars and beowolf clusters I cannot own.
  63. see Toffler, also by collapser · · Score: 0

    Alvin + Heidi Toffler note, in War and Anti-War how subsonics can be used as a defense mechanism, where the sound is on the same frequency as the resonance of materials found in human internal organs - in other words, the dreaded brown noise.
    <BR><BR>fun idea, I just hope the sound engineers are doing their job properly at the next gig I go to.
    <BR><BR><BR>On a personal note, I am acutely affected by ultrasonics - some of which include televisions, which means I can hear a high pitch whenever i am in proximity to a TV (even if it is behind a closed door). I have also experienced this in physics class, where a high voltage was being passed through a sphere painted with metallic paint.
    <BR>can anyone enlighten me as to how this ultrasonic side-effect occurs in the first place?

    --
    <B>note to self:</B> <I>post as html</I>
    1. Re:see Toffler, also by Forgotten · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because it's not ultrasonic to you - you can hear the 15.75 (or therabouts) kHz horizontal scan of the TV. You may also be able to perceive the 60 Hz vertical scan as a low buzz. Some people can perceive that well into adulthood. I've just about lost it now (at 34), but in high school I could tell if the NTSC green-screen monitors in the Apple ][ lab were switched on from the floor above and a couple of hundred feet away (they were much louder if the computers were off, hence no video signal). It was really pretty irritating sometimes. As you note, tones near the top end can make you feel quite squidgy.

      So you (and I) just happen to have a higher top-end than most people your age (I'm guessing), in your cochlea, cortex, or both. This is as much a curse as a blessing so don't go feeling too superior (after all if it were really superior, everyone would be that way). But don't worry, you won't be able to hear it in 5-10 years. ;)

      I'm not familiar with the sphere experiment. Possibly your physics teacher was some sort of alien spy. It sounds a bit like the inversion of the way some microphones work, so the sound would have been able to vary with the voltage. But if you could hear it, it was sound, not ultrasound - more or less by definition.

    2. Re:see Toffler, also by frn123 · · Score: 1

      When passing parked cars, i can hear if their car-alarm is activated. Only for some alarms tho, others are maybe of better quality/other frequencies.

    3. Re:see Toffler, also by TheLink · · Score: 1

      And they say on the Internet nobody knows if you're a dog... ;)

      Seriously tho, what if we are losing our high frequency hearing because of all these irritating CRTs blasting out 15+KHz over the years?

      --
    4. Re:see Toffler, also by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Seriously tho, what if we are losing our high frequency hearing because of all these irritating CRTs blasting out 15+KHz over the years?

      We are losing our high frequency hearing... but it is certainly not because of the frequency emitted by CRT's.

      Case in point: The majority of the world's population isn't around a CRT enough (if ever) to get any kind of ear damage because of a CRT. People who are also well-nourished enough and live in a rural enough areas to discount environmental damage.

      It's still quite possible to test these people for the range of frequencies they can hear. And it has happened, and is well documented.

      The findings are relatively conclusive: As you get older, the maximum audible frequency decreases with age.

      The rate of degradation is fairly constant, however there are factors which do increase the degradation.

      For instance, an American who:
      * doesn't listen to loud music
      * has never been to a dance club or rock concert
      * doesn't work at an airport, etc...
      * but is frequently exposed to 'normal' noise
      * (ie. Ned Flanders)

      Will have a lower rate of hearing degradation.

      However, when an American attends his/her first rock concert or other prolonged exposure to that level of volume, s\he will show a measurable (and permanent) decrease in the maximum frequency that s\he can hear.

      The reason that many MP3 encoders filter out anything above 16 kHz is that around 25-30 years old, that is the maximum frequency the average human can hear. Why retain information that all but the most golden of adult ears will be unable to hear? That is an example of how most such engineering works -- fitting the solution to 99.999% of the problem.

      Its also why the developers of the CD figured that a maximum reproduceable frequency above 20kHz would be sufficient -- They went for the maximum possible (at the time, which was 22. kHz) in a failed attempt to satisfy the audiophiles.

      (Disclaimer: I have a scientific disdain for audiophinles: Audiophiles will pay $4000 for a *power cable* which they believe will give them better sound -- when the electrical utility's wiring is (far and away) the weakest link. Who cares how clean the power is from your house to the audio equipment -- the vast majority of any noise is going to come in from the miles of wire from the power plant to their home-- not from the feet of wire from the power plug to their equipment... or their house's wiring...)

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    5. Re:see Toffler, also by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      The reason that many MP3 encoders filter out anything above 16 kHz is that around 25-30 years old, that is the maximum frequency the average human can hear.

      Agreed but for one distinction - that's the maximum that (Western) adults have indicated they can hear in lab tests. This has some applicability, but it's also about the test. People thought they knew the resolving limits of human vision until someone developed the vernier acuity test. A lot depends on the test, and we've only begun to get clever in developing them. Things like threshold and JND tests are interesting and useful, but not the final word. There is no final word.

      Ultrasound may (probably does) affect the perception and experience of other sound, just as the infrasound in the informal experiment cited in the article. This could be true even when it's clear that the cochlea isn't responding at the high end where it used to. There may be (are) other mechanisms of response we don't know about yet.

      That doesn't change the utility of the studies of course, nor many of the inferential conclusions. For instance it's pretty ironclad that normal response to high frequency sounds declines steadily with age (and acutely with trauma) as you note. But I wouldn't assume from that that a low-pass filter (or 44kHz sampling resolution) can't change the listening experience for a 65 year old listener. I think it still can, even if subtly.

  64. I get angry and frustrated by prockcore · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I get angry and frustrated by webpages I cannot read. ./ effect is hazardous to our health.

  65. Possible "Spiritual" Relationship Too by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think of all those high-church folks who maintain that "rock is a tool of the devil."

    Okay, hang in there, and don't mod me down YET...

    My father for years has preferred a high-church style worship service, where the newer, "pop" elements such as drums and bass guitar are shunned. He has maintained that certain types of music themselves are capable of creating a purely emotional response, independent of the actual spiritual qualities of the music. For this reason, he feels it's dangerous to emphasize rock-style worship services, because there might be confusion or conflict between the emotional push of the music and the individual's ability to freely approach his God on his own terms, without someone else kicking at his subconcious.

    The spiritual aspects of this aside, I believe this article lends some credence to that viewpoint.

    (I rather LIKE the bass and drums, and I personally feel that I often NEED a kick in the rear, so to speak, to get me paying attention to the spiritual. So it's okay with me to use infrasound to get my attention...)

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Possible "Spiritual" Relationship Too by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      According to the article, cathedrals and churches have used infrasound (presumably organ) to enhance emotions for a few hundred years. I'd personally think that high-church style music would therefore actually be more likely to cause 'kicking at the subconscious' than rock music, which is not likely to hit such low lows. At least with the rock music, you're aware of the effects, whereas you can't hear the infrasound.

    2. Re:Possible "Spiritual" Relationship Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've noticed based on my study of world religions, their scriptures, personal observation at different worship services, and just talking to people that there's a big difference in music and denominations.

      For example, if you walk into a Roman Catholic Church, especially one where the Latin Mass is still being said, or one that still holds tightly to its history of traditional Catholic music in the service, you'll see that worship is fixed more on the Eucharist (the body and blood of Christ present before you). The focus isn't as much on how the individuals FEEL as much as it is focusing their minds and hearts towards worshipping God.

      Walk into a fundamental Christian Church (or any given protestant denomination (non denominational means protestant, if you think otherwise it's time to read some Church History books and learn the real history of Christianity) and you'll see people either jumping up and down, swaying in the pews, yelling and screaming, or just caught up in the loud 'praising' to rock, pop, or other such lively music of our times. Usually the so-called pastor will deliver (what the people attending may call) a lively sermon and you will hear the people talking more about the music and the sermons as the basis for their choice in choosing their Church - whereas the Catholics are more likely to tell you that the reason they are Catholic is due to many things, some being that (a) it is the Church founded by Christ, (b) the Eucharist is there - it is for worship. Yes, the music and a powerful homily helps, but worship is the reason they're there.

      With the Protestant/Fundamental Churches what you're more likely to see (when compared to the Catholic Mass) is people being entertained. "The music and the sermon" they say. They are entertained by the music, (they are more likely to focus on themselves and those around them during their service instead of focusing their attention on worshipping Christ) and they are entertained by the sermon. Chances are a great majority of them will walk out of their Protestant church feeling great from all the entertainment. Just as if they had attended a football game and cheered in the stands, chatted with friends, and their team won. A great many of them will NOT remember their pseudo-pastor's sermon, since it only served to envigorate them with the message for the moment.

      Many people feel Catholic Masses are too 'boring' or 'dismal' because there is less chance in many of the parishes of lively music and a firey sermon that jolts you. So a big majority of people will 'church hop' through Christian denominations and look for what fits (entertains) them the most. The problem is, these people have a serious lack of education when it comes to Christianity. They likely don't understand the real meaning of the word worship, or how to worship, so they confuse entertainment with worship. How many churches have you been to where they boast of having a TV in their same 'worship' space on Sunday for football and/or the superbowl? C'mon. In a Catholic Church such worship space is sacred, and for good reason. Most often they're the ones who believe their fundamental pseudo-pastor when they are told their Church was established by Christ. Wrong. Christ established the Catholic Church, and this is fact. Protestant/Non-denominational churches didn't exist until the 1500/1600's when Martin Luther broke away from his Catholicism. The waves of his split (and circulation of controversial pamphlets) are still felt today in the thousands of Protestant denominations we see today.

      My advice to those who would flame me because they enjoy the entertainment at their Protestant church is to: read the history of Christianity and study how worship existed in the East before it came to the West. Once you understand the real meaning behind worship, you'll see why a lot of Catholics leave Mass feeling good for different reasons. They weren't entertained. They were devoting their time to serious worship. The effect goes beyond mental/physical means and extends into the spiritual.

      I'm not saying the Protestant churches have zero value. You're still there to pray and sing to God. You exist to help and love one another. But since the 1600's, those who have broken away from the Catholic Church have seperated and watered down their services to the point that many of them appear more like pep rallies than worship services.

  66. Best News Ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well hopefully this means I won't have to listen to Dashboard Confessional and all those other emo bands.

  67. No, John Cage does by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 2, Informative

    John Cage totally has Paul Simon beat in the 'sound of silence' game. His song, 4'33", IS silence!

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:No, John Cage does by Van+Halen · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but according to this article (last paragraph), he is suing some guy for plagiarising that piece. My god, this makes the RIAA antics look angelic! Ridiculous.

    2. Re:No, John Cage does by Van+Halen · · Score: 1

      Eh, that's what happens when you post while doing something else. Meant to say his publishers sued (and got a 6 figure settlement), not that he is suing. I'm not even sure if the guy's still alive?

    3. Re:No, John Cage does by dotgod · · Score: 1

      I never realized somebody could write SO MUCH about absolutely NOTHING.

  68. The Microsoft Sound by maxmg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I strongly suspect that those stupid Windows startup jingles have an infrasound component. Drives me NUTS every time I hear it...
    That would also explain why they were so expensive.

    --
    I asked for a refund - and got my monkey back.
    1. Re:The Microsoft Sound by Tyrian · · Score: 1
      I admit: I'd never been particularly enthused upon hearing the Microsoft Sound, but decided to revist it when I came across this entry on everything2:

      "The idea came up at the time when I was completely bereft of ideas. I'd been working on my own music for a while and was quite lost, actually. And I really appreciated someone coming along and saying, 'Here's a specific problem -- solve it.' The thing from the agency said, 'We want a piece of music that is inspiring, universal, blah-blah, da-da-da, optimistic, futuristic, sentimental, emotional,' this whole list of adjectives, and then at the bottom it said 'and it must be 3¼ seconds long.' I thought this was so funny and an amazing thought to actually try to make a little piece of music. It's like making a tiny little jewel. In fact, I made 84 pieces. I got completely into this world of tiny, tiny little pieces of music. I was so sensitive to microseconds at the end of this that it really broke a logjam in my own work. Then when I'd finished that and I went back to working with pieces that were like three minutes long, it seemed like oceans of time." -- Brian Eno


      The 'father' of ambient himself made the sound, despite his personal use of a Macintosh. Just food for thought.
  69. Binaural beats? by majestynine · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Binaural beats (stfw for loads of info) work by causing the brain to 'hear' the resulting frequency which would normally be outside of the human range of hearing (ie 4hz).

    This is done by playing two different frequencies into the different ears (ie 300 hz into one ear, 304 into the other: your brain then entrains to a 4hz frequency)

    Does anyone have any idea if this device could remove the need for the two frequencies by simply generating the Such things would be useful for brain washing, because if a speaker can put his audience into an alpha state (2/3hz), then they are more susceptible to impressions (thats why many religions use repeditive beating drums in their rituals etc)

    1. Re:Binaural beats? by Animus+Howard · · Score: 2, Informative

      > This is done by playing two different frequencies into
      > the different ears (ie 300 hz into one ear, 304 into the
      > other: your brain then entrains to a 4hz frequency)

      Proximate, but no panatella.

      It's not your brain that does that, it's an actual physical effect. The technical term is heterodyning and it takes place with things like radio waves as well as sound waves, so it can't be a "brain" thing.

      If you mix a 100KHz radio signal with a 110KHz radio signal you will generate "beat" signals at plus-and-minus the difference, i.e. 90KHz and 120KHz. In fact that is the basis for many (all?) analog radio/tv/etc. receivers. The tuner uses an oscillator to generate an RF signal of a certain frequency, which beats with the off-air signal to produce a new signal at a specific frequency. The tuner then decodes the signal at the "intermediate frequency". Change the freqency of the RF oscillator and you change the off-air frequency which beats with it to produce the intermediate frequency. That way the tuner can be optimized to receive a single frequency, thereby simplifying the design.

    2. Re:Binaural beats? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      You're correct that heterodyning occurs with RF, but that involves a non-linear mixing step, not simple wave superposition. An article in Sci American described the effect noted by the previous poster, i.e. that the brain does 'create' tones that aren't there depending on the frequencies of tones imposed on the ears. Note that if your scenario were true, the subject would hear two tones, one the sum, one the difference (assuming perfect mixing).

      In your example (again assuming perfect mixing), a 100KHz signal mixed with a 120KHz signal would produce 20KHz and 220KHz signals, along with the original 100KHz and 120KHz signals. A doubly-balanced mixer would supress the input signals, leaving only the sum and difference products.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Binaural beats? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      It's not your brain that does that, it's an actual physical effect. The technical term is heterodyning and it takes place with things like radio waves as well as sound waves, so it can't be a "brain" thing.

      No, it would have to be a brain thing in this case, because each ear is hearing a pure (unmixed) frequency, assuming you're using headphones. The sound waves themselves aren't actually physically combining. It's possible they might be resonating within your skull so I wonder if the effect still occurs when you turn the volume down low. I'm going to try this with my music gear and see what actually happens.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  70. Genius idea! by Kethinov · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I should get into soundless music. That way, no one will have to yell at me from across the hall to turn it down!

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  71. Re:Experimental Noise Has Been Here Already-IV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm wondering if those mood CDs, you know the ones that say they will give you more energy, or mellow you out, make you sleeep better, etc use such a principle? Ususally you can find them in the new age section.

  72. The Project's Website by Stinson · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found the project group's website at spacedog.biz, the webpage being specfically http://www.spacedog.biz/infrasonic.htm

  73. Conspiracy by naoursla · · Score: 1

    The government has been using this for years in their orbital mind control lasers.

    fnord

  74. Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is not news and its bad science. Its been VERY well documented for over 1000 years that infrasound stirs emotions. Cathedrals have long had infrasonic and ultrasonic pipes in the organs. Nazi's used to play infrasonics at rallys to insight violent emotions.

    dont beleive me? just do a google search for "cathedral infrasonic organ". Or check out this page which mentions the use by nazi's

    the fact that the articel mentions none of this prior work sugests this is crap science.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by jesser · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or check out this [borderlands.com] page which mentions the use by nazi's

      That sounds scary, but do you know why infrasound weapons haven't been used in actual battle?

      Infrasound weapons seem like they'd be good terrorist weapons, because you can't tell whether you've been attacked by one or not. Once the media started reporting that terrorists are using infrasound weapons, any momentary nausea could cause people to get scared and possibly more nauseous.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    2. Re:Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      An article is not a research paper. I think the fact that the article mentions none of this prior work suggests this is crap journalism.

    3. Re:Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by torpor · · Score: 1

      You could say that about lasers as well.

      Can't see them.

      Can't easily detect them (well, that may not be true), can only feel their burning presence.

      It's a good thing terrorists don't have these, eh?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    4. Re:Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Once the media started reporting that terrorists are using infrasound weapons, any momentary nausea could cause people to get scared and possibly more nauseous.

      That's one trait they share with chemical weapons. Had it not been for the spectre of Bin Laden, the 21 might still be alive!

    5. Re:Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 3, Informative

      the fact that the articel mentions none of this prior work sugests this is crap science.

      No, the fact that a highly summarized article on a news website doesn't mention prior work suggests it's crap reporting. If you read any scientific papers from these researchers and there's no prior recognition or control groups mentioned...THEN it's crap science. What you've done is like reading the Science News article on the human genome mapping project and crying foul.

      (and they did mention prior work in church organs anyways, as I quote:

      Infrasound has been used by organists in churches and cathedrals for at least 250 years to create grand, high-octane music.

      Some scientists also claim it is the cause of the uneasy feelings and changes of emotion experienced in places believed to be haunted.
      )

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    6. Re:Cathedrals and Nazi's use infrasound by gobbo · · Score: 1
      Hitler [or one of his cronies] claimed that "without the loudspeaker, we would never have conquered Germany" [paraphrased and hearsay from Jacques Attali, ymmv]. They understood emotions and acoustics. That knowledge was largely transferred to USSR and USA spy agencies after WW2.

      [btw: you mean "incite", though they did have insight into violent emotions too]

  75. I have only one thing to say... by kentyman · · Score: 1

    I'm speechless.

    --
    You know where you are? You're in the $PATH, baby. You're gonna get executed!
  76. Two minutes fourty-two seconds by kenh · · Score: 1

    When I first read this, I thought it was about pieces like "2:42", which is a carefully "composed" piece that dictates the manner the piece is to be approached, the behaviour of the "player" while the piece is performed, and is really a study in what is, and is not, music. The "piece" is composed of full rests, and is typically performed by approaching, sitting down and being ready to play the piano for, you guessed it, two minutes and fourty-two seconds.

    The crowd reaction/noises are, in effect, the composition.

    It has been transcribed to other instruments, if you don' thave a piano handy... ;^)

    --
    Ken
  77. I made an infrasound speaker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easy:
    1. buy a pair of speakers with 12 inch woofers from your local cheap 'n' nasty discount shop.
    2. connect them to an amp that's way too powerful for them.
    3. play music as loud as you can.

    ignore the smoke that you'll see and smell after a couple of minutes, that's just a normal part of the conversion to infrasound speakers.

    they work really well. my emotions became really intense (only anger though, no joy). in fact, they work so well that my emotions become intense even if i just look at them.

  78. Infrasonic QGM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Infrasonic QGM
    www.chinahealthways.com

    Have Fun!

  79. Was I the only kid who read Three Investigators? by epepke · · Score: 1

    More than 30 years ago, I read a kids' mystery book centered on The Three Investigators (roughly equivalent to Nancy Drew or The Hardy Boys but a bit smarter) where infrasound was used in a supposedly haunted house.

  80. Re:yes. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1
    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  81. It's still Rock and Roll to me... by FifthRayne · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think you misunderstood the basic premise of the experiment. The "Infrasound" was added on top of music played by a Russian pianist. In Soviet Russia....wait, I promised I wouldn't make a lame reference.

    1. Re:It's still Rock and Roll to me... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "The "Infrasound" was added on top of music..."

      Well, actually it was added underneath.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  82. Settlements by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The parties reached agreement without litigation

    One out-of-court settlement could be regarded as a slight (but not precedent setting) win for the copyright or patent owner, as it makes the others marginally more likely to settle or face the full wrath of the legal system.

    What seems to have ticked off Cage's heirs is the implication that Mr. Bat and Mr. Cage had collaborated on the piece and was thus trading on his reputation without authority.

    So would it be wise to think of it as more of a trademark issue than a copyright issue? In that case, Cage's estate would be able to sue Midway, as Midway's Mortal Kombat video game (which features a character named "JOHNNY CAGE") plays an excerpt of "4"33'" (that is, calls the MusicStop() function) during some of the menus.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Settlements by kfg · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think so. I get the feeling it was more of an issue of reputation. More akin to slander than a trademark violation. Some people still rely on the concept of "good name" rather than pulling the trademark card.

      Certainly Cage's estate *could* sue Midway, but are either unaware of the issue, or since no *explicit* claim of joint authorship was made simply haven't gotten their noses out of joint over it.

      KFG

  83. Re:Noise i can't hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That had me laughing so hard I cried.

  84. Re:or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ya one rubber + your parents and we wouldn't have had to read that post

  85. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ran across some college kid one time that said he made one for a friends dog with a frequency of around 8hz. Apparently it helped reduce the number and severity of the seizures the dog had.

    You know the deal though. He said she said. Take with a grain of salt and call me in the morning.

  86. The Microsoft Sound in Cool Edit by yerricde · · Score: 1

    There's no infrasound in the Windows start sound, at least in the versions I use. I just ran "The Microsoft Sound.wav" (Windows 95 boot), "The Microsoft Sound.wav" (Windows 98 boot), "Windows Logon Sound.wav" (Windows 2000/ME boot), and "Windows Logoff Sound.wav" (Windows 2000 shutdown) through a Cool Edit low-pass filter with cutoff frequency 20 Hz, and negligible[1] energy remained. (I did not test Windows XP boot sounds because I don't have immediate access to a Windows XP machine at my location.)

    [1] I define "negligible" as anything whose average power is less than -48 dBFS, the absolute noise floor of 8-bit linear PCM.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  87. Hmm by Heynow50 · · Score: 1

    "They showed the audience's emotions intensified as the inaudible sound vibrations, too low for the human ear to perceive, were blasted out during a 50-minute piano recital. Those feeling uncomfortable when the concert began, found their mood turning to anger. Others, who had felt happy, started to notice sensations of joy." Hmm, I wonder if joyous ones were women and the angry ones were their husbands who were dragged to a piano recital.

  88. Of course by cmdean · · Score: 1
    people's emotions are affected by noises they cannot hear.

    Look at the emotional reaction of a parent after more than 30 seconds of sudden silence from the kids. Shock, then fear, usually followed by anger...

  89. Liverpool, you say? by ptaff · · Score: 1

    I guess it's not the first time that people get moved by music from Liverpool without being able to hear it. A similar worldwide experiment took place between 1962 and 1966. Then the lads made music to be listened to.

  90. argh... by ferrocene · · Score: 1

    I have that damn Britney Spears song running through my head again. I wonder how that hap...

    oh.

    --
    Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
  91. A ripoff of pootie tang by frizzzanks · · Score: 1

    pootie tang's latest track was soundless music, and it was soundless music too.

  92. Pootie Tang! by boysimple · · Score: 1

    Pootie done did it again! Pootie done did it again!

    --
    My life is dedicated hosting
  93. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Funny


    There's only so much torture you can give before it becomes inhumane..

    I'm fairly sure N'Sync for more than 5 minutes is cruel and unusual punishment.

    Tortured like that for 10 minutes, he'd probably die of an internal hemorrhage, or give up the locations of every missile in the country, and give you his 67 wives. :)

    (don't get optimistic. Only two if the wives are remotely cute)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  94. Beatles - Sgt. Peppers by wass · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Beatles did this too at the very end of the Sgt. Pepper's album. The second-to-last thing you hear (or don't hear) is a very high audio frequency, lasting a few seconds, which probably most audio equipment of the time couldn't reproduce well, but John Lennon said it was put there just to annoy your dog.

    Even cooler is the last about 4 seconds of the album, which is an endless loop (when played on vinyl), where the needle stays in the same circular track ad infinitum. On CD, they play the loop a few times before ending the track.

    While on the subject of cool vinyl tricks, supposedly (I haven't seen it), Monty Python had a comedy record with two intertwined spiral tracks. So when you played the same side, sometimes you'd get one track, and sometimes the other. Must have totally tripped out some folks.

    --

    make world, not war

    1. Re:Beatles - Sgt. Peppers by compling · · Score: 1

      most audio equipment of today wouldn't reproduce it either - amplifiers etc. have filters with cutoff at 20-20kHz, the human hearing range.

      it seems to me that the beatles' masterplan of dog-torture never worked out.

    2. Re:Beatles - Sgt. Peppers by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      Even cooler is the last about 4 seconds of the album, which is an endless loop (when played on vinyl), where the needle stays in the same circular track ad infinitum. On CD, they play the loop a few times before ending the track.

      This is true of [some] versions of Pink Floyd's Meddle LP. The final "beep" of "Echoes" just keeps going and going and going...

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  95. From the Simpsons by andyrut · · Score: 1

    Lisa Simpson: You have to listen the notes she's not playing.
    Other Patron: Pfft, I could do that at home.

    1. Re:From the Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how far back in the comments do you read before you post?

  96. Re:Better yet by symbolic · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Go into another room. You'd be amazed at the effect that a little bit of stray bass can have on someone. For people that live in close quarters (condos, townhomes, and apartments), this effect is all too common - neighbors might think they're being very kind by keeping the volume low (which they are), but they don't realize that lower frequencies travel further, and are not absorbed by surrounding surfaces at the same rate as higher frequencies. Because of this, even bass at seemingly low levels can be heard clearly enough by people in close proximity to affect concentration, sleep, etc.

  97. What frequency? by Q3vi1 · · Score: 1

    I want to know the sound pattern that triggers people to be horney, particularly women. Maybe I'll set up a small infra-sound system at a club, or in my room :)~~ I'm just dirty like that.

  98. Ah yes...sound free from me to thee by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ...like the smell of a barking spider.

    "Out of the cave, right now, you filthy mouth breathing neolithic bastard!"

    1. Re:Ah yes...sound free from me to thee by DRACO- · · Score: 1

      LOL Barking spider...

      One of my brother's friends calls them "Chinese barking spiders"..

      I topped it with "Tazmanian albino barking spiders".

      Sometimes I just say "Damned spiders" or slam my foot on the floor and say "Got the stinky 8 legged bastard".

      (For those that dont have a clue, blaming a fart on your dog isnt the norm anymore. Now we blame it on barking spiders which confuses the hell out of anyone new to the concept and gets stuck in the stink as everyone else makes a move away from the explosion site)

      DRACO-

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
  99. Well, now we know by KallNoJoy · · Score: 1

    If a bear shits in the woods and.... ah, never mind.

    --
    next($sig) unless($sig =~ /funny/);
  100. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by mumkin · · Score: 2, Informative
    You are, perhaps, recalling the 24/7 rock bombardment of a holed-up Manuel Noriega during the US invasion of Panama?

    George Washington University's National Security Archive has a playlist of what the psyops guys used to subdue Noriega here. See Pages 4, 5, and 6 specifically.

  101. No control group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There should be another group of people gathered together who are not exposed to the sound waves. Then the possibility of simply spending time with others in silence accounting for changed emotions can be ruled out. This is the hole in the experiment - which is quite interesting and warrants things being done correctly.

  102. silent pianist dude = John Cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Cage

  103. Pootie Tang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (In Chris Rock voice) Poootie!!! He's too good!! HE'S TOO GOOD!! POOOOOOTTIIIEEE!!!!

  104. The Sound of Silence by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

    /Abraham Simpson : Turn it up... TURN IT UP!!!!

  105. am i the only one thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That it would REALLY get interesting if you smoked some weed first? :)

  106. Speaking of experiments... by djupedal · · Score: 4, Funny

    We used to have a borrowed sine wave generator to play with when we were kids. It initially seemed to be doing something, but as we couldn't hear anything, we decided to find out if it was actually working. We brought in the normally lazy cat, and cranked up the generator...the cat exited at high speed. I'm sure there were emotions related to that experiment, but beyond our reaction of laughter, the cat was not in any mood to provide details.

    1. Re:Speaking of experiments... by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      Pity. I'm sure that would've been an interesting conversation. :)

  107. A "moment" of silence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, now I recall seeing that played at concert shortly after he died about 10 years ago. Instead of having a moment of silence, they commemorated his death by playing 4'33".

  108. Damn! by djupedal · · Score: 1

    And me without a matching set of aluminum foil earplugs and pointed hat!

  109. Re:Was I the only kid who read Three Investigators by SnakeStu · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought of, when I saw this topic come up, was a Hardy Boys book that also used the same type of effect in a supposedly-haunted house. I never read The Three Investigators. Did one copy from the other?

  110. Re:Was I the only kid who read Three Investigators by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    The book was called "The Secret of Terror Castle", and was my first introduction to the mysteries of sound waves. I just read this about 6 months ago (going through some stuff from kid days...)and it is still a good book; they have their headquarters in a junkyard, Jupiter Jones builds gadgets and repairs stuff they find there to use in the solving of crimes and mysteries.

    Very geeky, realistic(YMMV), and cool in that early 60's sort of ham radio way.

    Technology ruins those kind of stories.

    Good books for a kid who likes Harry Potter - the 3 do all these things relying on brain power and not magic. The thinking may transfer....

  111. Oxymoron - the silence is deafening by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    Maybe not deafening, but isn't this a form of remote mind control?

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  112. Low Frequency Vibrations Make People Happy by saikou · · Score: 1

    Yesss! :) Look at all those massaging chairs people bought over the time. Wonderful vibrations, make you feel nice and comfortable.

  113. Re:Was I the only kid who read Three Investigators by Silh · · Score: 1

    I vaguely remember this book, but it was the first thing that came to mind when I read this. IIRC, they used a pipe organ where the pipes had been lengthened to decrease the frequencies, and it generated feelings of fear for those inside the haunted house.

    Three Investigators was as great series of books, though. I always wished I had a hideout like their RV hidden under the junkyard.

    ??? (For those who understand the reference :)

    --
    -- Silhouette
  114. OT: Good terrorist weapon by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 1
    Infrasound weapons seem like they'd be good terrorist weapons, because you can't tell whether you've been attacked by one or not.
    I think you have a misunderstanding of terrorism, which is somewhat understandable considering the current state of the world. Terrorism is a tool utilized to cheaply attempt to get policy changes as an alternative to war. That is, Osama bin Laden could attempt a conventional war against the US, would likely get slaughtered and accomplish nothing. However, by making a public act of terrorism to instill fear in the population, it becomes possible to 'scare' or instill 'terror' into the target so that they feel vulnerable, despite their incredibly powerful militaries that are supposed to protect them.

    Because of this reasoning, infrasound would be an absolutely horrible terrorist weapon, unless you claimed responsibility for it. There's a reason that terrorism utilizes really horrific methods that are really public.
  115. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by GreatOgre · · Score: 2, Funny

    I seem to recall that elephants communicate using low frequency waves. I wonder what any elephants that might have been within range thought of the crap they were hearing.

  116. Infrasound as a public nusance by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the 1980s, the Center for Computer Music and Acoustics at Stanford was playing around with infrasonics. I had a horse at a barn about a quarter mile away, and the horses got very upset when CCRMA pumped low frequency audio into the ground. Horses get some contact audio via their legs, and can sense footsteps. To them, this sounded like some big creature they couldn't see. I complained to the head of CCRMA, and they stopped doing outdoor tests.

  117. IF only they could do this to Rap Music.. by siouxmoux · · Score: 0

    IF only they could do this to Rap Music..

  118. Re:Multiple Grooves by knewman · · Score: 1

    I think the Monty Python album was promoted as being "three- sided".

    I bought an album at a thrift store yesterday that was similar. It was produced sometime in the 1950's or 60's for the purpose of playing bingo at home. The record came with cards, and the audio was someone calling out "B-2, N-34" etc. The cool thing is that there are 4 intertwined spirals so that when the needle drops, you get one of 4 possible tracks.

  119. Digital Music by md81544 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The outcome from experiments like this would be interesting for us with respect to digital music.

    People (well, HiFi geeks) have been lambasting CDs since they came out because digital music doesn't contain the "whole picture" and now with MP3 and OGG we are chucking out even more of the sounds which we can't hear.

    This is interesting. The reproduction of your OGG file played through your streaming device on your LAN may sound excellent, but does it have the same power to challenge the emotions?

    I can't get so excited about music these days (compared to when I used vinyl), but maybe I'm just getting old...

  120. The Exorcist by opencity · · Score: 1

    In The Exorcist they used some sub-aural sounds to scare. When I saw it in rerelease a couple of years ago (perfect date movie) after a decade of making dance records with 808 kick drums etc ... I could here some very bass-y tones providing ominous ambience.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  121. umm by andy_fish · · Score: 1

    can you say, "expectation effect"?

    --
    & I wish I knew the password to your heart . . . &
  122. pootie tang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pootie tang, with chris rock! Remember the soundless hit song of pootie tang?

  123. Thunders by golo · · Score: 1

    I remember reading sometime ago a theory on how the effect of the low frequency componets of thunders is what made ancient people think of them as signs form the Gods. Also I think hearing a thunder out in the country where there are less obstacles to attenuate it is far more "moving" than hearing it in a city.

  124. Output by CubicDDD · · Score: 0

    Wow! ... now i can play music on my no-soundcard-system!

  125. Even journalists do it. by caluml · · Score: 1

    By Laura Davis, Daily Post
    Some physical affects were also experienced...


    Some physical effects were also experienced

    You've got to cry when Slashdotian type errors occur in proper (?) journalism.
    I'm surprised that they didn't mix up you're, and your, and there, their, and they're.
    Laura Davies, hang your head in shame.

  126. In Recent News... by RyansPrivates · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has introduced Windows Media Player 10, which has support for the new DirectEmotion Layer. It also ensures that all 'infrasounds' encoded in the new format will have embedded DRM (Digital Rights Management). Microsoft in turn destroys the GPL OpenEmotion project.

    From Microsoft.com

    --
    If at first you don't succeed... How does that go again? Ah, forget it.
  127. Re:Multiple Grooves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a great big beautiful wonderful incredible super spectacular day.

  128. bingo details by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Ok geek call here but I'd *love* to get a copy of that Bingo album. Could you post up as many details as you have about that album so I could try to track it down... cheers

    1. Re:bingo details by knewman · · Score: 2, Informative
      The title is "Sandy Becker Calls BINGO". The fronts lists it as RCA Victor LBY-1034. The cover is red and yellow with a bingo card pictured. On the back is listed another "secret spiral" record, "LBY-1025 - Mel Allen's Baseball Game". The Copyright is listed as "1959 by DeSylco, Inc., Washington, D.C."



      The label on the disc is blue, and the imprint is "RCA Victor Bluebird". On the label, it says "sandy becker's bingo" and "this is a Secret Spiral Record (K1CP-5272). Engraved in the vinyl is "KICP-5272-25"

    2. Re:bingo details by fantomas · · Score: 1

      cheers for the info!

  129. air-lock by joehahn · · Score: 1

    im sure being inside an air-lock re and depressurizing 10-times-per-second will change one's mood.

    --
    *I used to be quite irreverent and ignorant. I am probably much smarter now. I seem to realize this every 45 days or so.
  130. Reminds me of Cannon Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skaven made this tracker music piece, Cannon Angel...

    Now I'm gonna open that file, copy/paste the story from it... it ain't sonic tech, but I'd imagine such sounds exist, which can stimulate you to heaven...

    The Story:

    After the Indo-Guinean war in 2088, the Limbic Telestimulator was banned from military use with an international treaty. But before this, the Valmet TK-8008 battle walker had already attained a legendary reputation amongst the sociocentralist troops. The soldiers who had survived its attack, have described it as a 'religious experience' and have been permanently affected, spending the rest of their lives writhing in obsessive desire. A new art genre was born; songs composed by the desperate souls who craved to be once more brutalized by this 'divine machine'.

    Wings like Razors
    Radar Eyes
    Thighs of Steel
    Chaingun Arms

    CANNON ANGEL;
    Will You Fuel My Heart?
    Will You Take My Life?
    Will You Hear My Last Breath?
    Will You Feast On My Death?

    Crush me;
    Grind me;
    Puncture me;
    BURN me BLIND!
    AAARGH!

    The idea of the weapon was crudely simple but effective: with a focused micromagnetic fluctuation field, the enemy soldiers' brains were stimulated remotely. Pure, raw, orgastic pleasure was found to be the most effective way to nullify the target's situational awareness, and make it an easy shot for the dual chainguns of the TK-8008. The stimulus was so strong that it left a permanent trace of addiction in the brain. The survivors could witness their fellow soldiers run into the fire and moan in crazed bliss as the HV-APE slugs hit their bodies.

  131. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
    "I wonder what any elephants that might have been within range thought..."

    Probably that those darned whales never shut up.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  132. Anti-infra-sound, anyone? by ites · · Score: 1

    If it's true that urban industrial infrasound pollution disturbs our bodies and minds, would it be possible to design passive or active noise reduction strategies to create a healthier living and working environment?
    E.g. silent rooms with insulation specifically designed to cut-out infrasound, or with anti-noise panels that actively eliminate it?
    I'm reminded of the effects of infrasound on marine mammals. Various armed forces use ultra-low level sound waves for carrying information across oceans, and some researchers believe this interferes with the navigation systems of whales and dolphins. Think cetecean brown noise...

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  133. Subwoofers by fateswarm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not only on cathedral organs and nazi experiments, but on simple every day life subwoofers this is on work as well. Most good(==expensive) subwoofers use a wide range of low frequencies that can only be "heard" by the body.

    It's not very difficult to imagine how it works. Remember how some low beat sounds in night clubs makes the body tremble.

  134. I Can`t Hear You ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yesterday upon the stair I met a man who wasn't there. He wasn't there again today. I wish that man would go away.

  135. Behind you! by olethrosdc · · Score: 1

    I think there had been even more interesting experiments regarding infrasound. One of them was related to temporary hallucinations that would induce the image of 'ghosts' at the periphery of your vision. This was actually confirmed experimentally iirc.

    The other interesting thing was that it is possible to use infrasound to create the effect of a noise that is coming from behind you. A noise coming from behind you naturally gets you 'anxious' and 'worried' because of the implications. (And yes, it is possible to make a sound coming from anywhere to sound as if it is coming from anywhere else - there are standard filtering techniques for that). Anyway, there are some particular infrasound frequences that have the 'behind you' effect I think.

    --

    I miss my rubber keyboard.(Homepage)

    1. Re:Behind you! by jellyfish_green · · Score: 1
      Yep, there was an investigator who found a natural infrasound resonance pattern in a "haunted" laboratory.

      Here's the link: Parapsychology

  136. Proper controls? by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't mention how they controlled for the piano music playing. So how do they know the people weren't reacting to the audible music?

  137. Psuedoscience with pseudosilence by Davak · · Score: 1

    Come on. Give me a break. This isn't science! You put a million coders in a room at the same time and tell them: "Hey, we are doing something to you. How are we affecting your coding?" Some people will say I am better... and some will say I am worse. Who cares if this pseudosilence is being played or not. Whatever. Just drawing attentions to somebody's emotions will probably cause someone to focus on those emotions and make them more intense. The control group will eliminate this "placebo" response. Do this for a week at a concert. For half the concerts have the pseudosilence playing... for the other half don't. Geez... just basic ole science. Davak

  138. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

    From the summary page:
    SouthCom has not yet produced a Noriega Compact Disc of these songs, so you'll have to dig them out of your personal music library, if you can.

    From an update on a further page:
    8/01: If you cannot find them in your personal music library, maybe someone else has a copy on one of the numerous file-sharing applications on the web.

    Ok, so I made that update up...but it's a nice playlist they have on pages 4-6. Some really good classic rock.

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  139. power of the oz aboriginal instrument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    called the yirdaki (better known as didgeridoo amongst whitefellas) can only be felt live and unplugged... you not only hear it..but feel it's bottom end frequencies travelling through your body

    yo, manymak %=====o

  140. Prior art by leoboiko · · Score: 1

    Before starting your experiments, please note that silence is patented.

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  141. OT: STFW by cluke · · Score: 1

    Interesting acronym.. did you just make this up, or is it widely used? (I'm presuming it's like RTFM but for google)

    Oh.. hold on... ;-)
    I've googled and found it in the jargon file.
    Still, I'd never heard it before.

    1. Re:OT: STFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU

  142. philip k. dick by kipple · · Score: 1

    ...mood organ anyone?

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  143. Re:Multiple Grooves by Fulton+Green · · Score: 1

    That's from an old, old Mad magazine! Late '70s timeframe.

    It was one of those "floppy vinyls" you could tear out of the magazine and play on a turntable. The song would start out with this "Super Spectacular Day" song, which was all cheery "Until ...", then the needle would take one of six possible paths, each of which described some kind of personal catastrophe.

  144. Latest hit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pooty done did it again!

  145. Re:ATTENTION TROLLS by Jesus,+Son+Of+God · · Score: 0

    You know, really, I don't think trolling JesusGeeks is funny. It's too easy, it's like the difference between trying to beat up little kids and the difference between trying to beat up your friends. Your friends can handle it, and it's all good fun 'till they kick you in the gonads.

    Wait. Did that make more sense than the stuff I said some 1970 years ago?

    Let's hope so...

    --
    +++ They all asked, "Are you then the Son of God?" He (Jesus) replied, "You are right in saying I am." (Luke 22:70)
  146. OT: funny story: Re:Noise i can't hear? by bongoras · · Score: 1

    My EX fiancee and I were driving home from a friend's house -- an hour ride -- and she was pissed off and not talking. I put some music on the radio and lit up a butt. About 15 minutes down the highway she said "well, I'm not going to ride all the way home in silence."

    I said, "I knew it was too good to be true."

    end of the silence... start of a fight...

  147. Intensify emotion. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Real life is full of sounds too low for you to hear. They probably cause sensations on the back of your neck and wierd feelings in your stomach all day. Adding infrasound to a concert made it seem more 'real' by adding these wierd sensations. Those that were going to hate the concert anyway REALLY hated it and those that were going to like it REALLY liked it.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  148. That explains everything.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    I thought somone had spiked my drink, bloody terrorists and there infrasound wiped me out for a day and I spent the next 3 days recovering.....

    (I think it was a hystermine release)

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  149. Ballard by alexmagni · · Score: 1

    Another interesting point made by Ballard in a long story (short novel?) of him, many years ago:
    The Sound-Sweep, Science-Fantasy #39 '60

  150. Infrasound & Elephants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    According to this Space Dog article by the same researchers, "The female elephant, for example, is only in oestrus for four days or so, once every four years. When she's ready for mating, she emits a distinctive, infrasonic call that attracts males from up to 4 kilometres away."

  151. Light & "night" have different effects due to by adzoox · · Score: 1
    We did an experiment in college where we blindfolded a person. They were not able to tell whether it was dark or light in the room. We used sound detectors to detect sound in the room with the lights on or the lights off. There was no "humanly detected" sound with the lights on (they were special lights, had UV and other spectrums in it) - the "no light" room had no detectable sounds period.

    We asked the "test subjects" to tell us which music was the original and which music was a copy. IN EVERY case, we played the exact same song from the exact same source, and in every case the "test subject" would pick the music heard in the dark as the original.

    This proved that light, undetectable to human ear sounds, have effect the listening experience. I suppose it could be extrapolated that since Music affects mood, so would inaudibles.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  152. I'd like to listen to that... by Peale · · Score: 1

    It'd be really nice if the site had released an MP3 of what they were doing in that theatre, so we could "listen."

    Oh, wait...

  153. Ben Hur by jmichaelg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My father was a teenager in Los Angeles during the 20's. Years ago, he told me that the director of Ben Hur (I think the 1925 version) wanted a scene of a crowd stampeding. Since the crowd was comprised of extras who didn't have a lot of acting experience, the director induced panic by playing a note on a 20 foot long organ pipe. The note was infrasonic and generated a level of unease that the extras couldn't identify but when instructed to run, they willing complied.

  154. Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the blasterbeam story telling that it has given orgasm to several womens in a outdoor concert... I'll let you search the web further on this one...

    P

  155. This will bew a good tool for increasing terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now the government has a secret tool up it's sleave, play unheard music on the streets to create more violence.

  156. NOT the first of it's kind by oakbox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As the concert at the Metropolitan Cathedral was the first of its kind, the experiment must be repeated to ensure that the affects are caused by infrasound and not by another stimulus.

    Sorry to burst the bubble, but I was a member of a band in 1997 (Urilliasekt) that did several infrasound performances. I didn't have a 12m long pipe and a big expense account, so settled for using computer generated tones through performance speakers that harmonized at the desired frequencies. Even though I thought I was brilliant in coming up with the idea, I later found out that someone else had thought of it first. The British Army experimented with harmonzing tones to produce infrasound in 1973. . . as a form of crowd control in Ireland. They had to stop because it induced epileptic seizures in some of the listeners.

    -oakbox

    --
    Not just answers, the correct questions.
  157. New tool for Oscar fever... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... as the film companies slip in emotion inducing infrasound to enhance the emotional content of the movies. "That movie moved me so much!" Yup. Like at 4 Hz.

    And an enterprising pan-handler with some technical savvy ....

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  158. The Hills Are Alive.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...With The Soundless Music

    Imagine Julie Andrews singing that one.

  159. Standing Wave Experiment by Ryoki Ikeda by nuxx · · Score: 1

    An interesting album to listen to with such a setup is Ryoji Ikeda's matrix for rooms. (review here).

    From the review...
    Now, by turning your head and/or slowly moving around the room, the sounds do change, slightly... perhaps with a little more patience and better-developed neck muscles I could have learned to "play" a particular tune, but mostly only get a bit of an not-excitingly-noticeable up-down-up-down pitch shift, sort of.

  160. Re:Better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When my neighbor parks his delivery truck outside the barely audible sound can drive me nuts. The whole house resinates with it and it can go on for half an hour. It's easier to feel than hear. The same can be true for loud music from cars, but at least they drive by before the feeling builds.

  161. Re:Multiple Grooves by gughunter · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, this is available on the MAD CD library (it was in stores a few years ago -- every issue of MAD scanned in, from the '50's to 1999 or so).

  162. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by Bizaff · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We got chick brains -- in vitro -- to dump 80 percent of the natural opioids in their brains,'"

    Aw, man! I've been tryin to get chicks to dump their brain opioids for all this time without infrasound!

    I don't know what that means, but it sure sounds pimpin.

  163. Anti-infrasound? by zackbar · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there might be a reverse of this sound that would calm people down.

    It seems like if there are sounds that amplify emotions, there should be sounds that diminish emotions.

    That would be great for places where riots or brawls break out. Instead of spraying pepper-spray at the crowd a few days ago, the Epitome security guards could have just played the calming infrasounds.

  164. The biscuit? by zackbar · · Score: 1

    I didn't know he played the piano!

    Was ally mcbeal in the audience?

  165. The Marketing of One Hand Clapping by gabec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else think we'll see stores seriously investing in bose speakers now? (to play these sounds that manipulate how you feel.) Customers will just think they /really/ like that store!

  166. Re:Less sensational title:-Bend me,shape me. by rushiferu · · Score: 1

    "Why bombard him with soundless music when we can bombard him with tasteless music. 24/7 of N-Sync should pound him into submission" And land you in front of a war crimes tribunal. There are laws against torture.

  167. Re:Noise i can't hear? by Placido · · Score: 1

    >> Guaranteed to put a loud and immediate stop to the silent treatment.

    Huh. Also likely to put a loud and immediate stop to your life.

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  168. Pooty Tang by FozzTexx · · Score: 1

    Pooty Tang does it again!

  169. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The album is called The Sounds of Silence. The song is called The Sound of Silence.

  170. SACD, DVD-Audio by Josuah · · Score: 1

    So, now there's a study which would seem to encourage the move back towards higher fidelity audio recordings, namely SACD and DVD-Audio. (I don't think we're going back to vinyl.) I suspected as much, but it's good that someone has executed a scientific study on the matter, although more studies are certainly needed.

  171. The power of placebo by dg123 · · Score: 0

    This experiment cannot be considered serious as long as there has not been a double test : one without this "silent music" (placebo) and one with it.

    Afterwards, comparing results on both can lead to many surprises.

  172. My emotions ARE affected by soundless music.... by fataugie · · Score: 1

    I am really really pissed off that I wasted my time and money buying something that has no sound.

    Come to think of it, I can see the new Conway Twitty Greatest Hits album.....74 minutes of silence.....

    --

    WTF? Over?

  173. Sound of Silence by mowph · · Score: 1

    In Japan, we actually have a "sound" that is made by a completely silent situation. It goes like this:

    " shiin..." (Sounds like the English word "sheen".)

    No kidding.

    There are some theories about the origin. The most believeable is that it was originally worded to match the "white noise" that your body creates itself in the absence of other sound. You can hear it if you listen carefully enough. (Or if you have tinnitis.)

    From my understanding of the article, what we have is a karaoke version of Max Smart's Hall of Hush?

  174. Earthquake? by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This feeling of unease might just be the result of evolution and conditioning, where subsonics emitted from the ground are a prelude to earthquakes.

    Subsonic == Earthquake
    Earthquake == Bad
    therefore
    Subsonic == Bad

  175. This is not new at all! by vDave420 · · Score: 1
    I remember reading about this phenomenon a LONG time ago!
    Here is the first book I remember reading that mentioned it. The Secret of Terror Castle (Three Investigators, No 1)

    Here is the link

    This book was published in 1964, as a childrens mystery book. Not exactly new science.

    -dave-

    Use BearShare for all your p2p needs!

    --
    The pig browse. With Google. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.
  176. No Surprise by Microsift · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dogs' hearing extends to much higher frequencies than humans. Dogs cannot hear low frequency sounds that humans can hear. This is why thunderstorms freak out dogs, they can't hear the thunder, but they can feel it.

    Responding to another thread, yes, organs and synthesizers do create sound that is outside the range of human hearing, but it's not done as part of some mind-control experiment, it affects the quality of the sound that you can hear(somehting to do with harmonics). Anyway that's what I recall from Music Theory...

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:No Surprise by green1 · · Score: 1

      purely anecdotal... but when I was buying speakers I was shown a pair that were supposed to be "as good" as the really expensive ones I was looking at... and they sounded great... but something was missing... the difference that I beleive I was sensing was the lack of any frequency response outside of the audible... you could "hear" the music just fine... but you couldn't "feel" it. the stuff outside of the audible spectrum may not be heard... but it defintely adds "depth" to the sound.
      The sub-audible portion (the base) is definitely felt, and adds a lot of depth to the music. I don't know enough what the high end frequencies add... (but I would suspect that they are just as important to the "full experience")

  177. Silent but deadly by Thrazzle · · Score: 1



    A fart can sure affect people's emotions even if they dont hear it. :)

  178. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PRAISE be the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

  179. DVD-Audio and SACD by sven7 · · Score: 1

    This seems to support arguments in favor of the wider frequency ranges offered by the higher definition music formats, DVD-Audio and SACD. While this seems to deal mainly with those frequencies below 20Hz, high-def audio proponents also claim that there are frequencies, above 20,000Hz, that can affect the enjoyment of music. Of course, your speakers have to be able to reproduce those frequencies. :)

  180. boom cars by klarck · · Score: 1

    So it's probably those gsd-dsmned inaudible base overtones from those fscking boom cars that those dsck-weed kids drive up and down my csck-sscking street all dsmn hours of the day that have been fscking pissing me off all this time!

    Otherwise, I'm usually a very laid-back person.

  181. Think of the implications! by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Ok, assume that some large organization (preferrably an acroymn ending with AA) who's members have discovered the use of these "subsonics" to induce "happiness" and other emotions.

    1) These emotion influencing subsonics can increase sales of songs in which they are embedded.

    2) Control of emotions can be useful at large events or for other large organizations (government).

    3) MP3's probably strip out the subsonics (depending on the bitrate, of course)... so they attenuate the usefulness of these subsonic-embedded songs. Thus removing the control element.

    Is this why the music industry is also anti-MP3, even though they could embrace the future of music?

    Is this why the government is loathe to control the "music cartel"? Because ultimately, the cartel is more useful than the alternative?

    Curiouser and curiouser...

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  182. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've seen how people emotional state are also affected by Weapons of Mass Destruction that no one can see.

    And "evidence" we can't see either.

  183. Live at the Deaf Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In San Francisco during the mid/late 70's, punk bands had a difficult time finding venues to play in.

    One place they found was the local deaf club, which turnd out to be a great choice because the deaf folks loved the LOUD music.

    Why? Because they could feel it, and dance to it.

    I have a record that was released from some of the shows there called "Live at the Deaf Club".

    It features bands like the Dead Kenndeys (who do a killer version of Police Truck), Flipper, and such.

  184. Soundscapes and Acoustic Ecology by gobbo · · Score: 1
    Acoustic ecology and soundscape studies try to puzzle out the whole relationship of humans to sound; this goes from physics to cultural stuff like music, and includes wierdness like how we respond to harmonics, sub/ultrasonics, and the like. Just a FYI since no-one else has mentioned this and it's core to the topic.

    World Forum for Acoustic Ecology

    Silence and Noise

    World Soundscape Project

  185. Schr�dinger by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
    . It starts to get a bit Heisenbergian the more you think about it.

    I think you mean "Schrödingerian." ;-)

    Everything is music,
    -Toddhisattva

    1. Re:Schr�dinger by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "Schrödingerian."


      Are you certain?


      Rich

  186. Time for the tinfoil hat. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Ripped off from here

    Some of the other techniques described in articles linked from that site involve direct brain stimulation by VHF or microwave energy.

    If they start going into general use - even intermittently - it may be time for the tinfoil hats.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  187. Re:Better yet by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Another thing is that movie producers know very well about the effects that sound can have on their audience. They will sometimes introduce inaudible, low-frequency noise ( 20 Hz), because it has that very effect. Lower frequencies tend to raise anxiety, and so they're used in situations when they audience is supposed to be gripped with fear or suspense.

  188. Well... by Iscariot_ · · Score: 1

    When someone drops a silent but deadly, I obviously can't hear it, but it definitely affects my emotions (such as "RUNNN!!!").

  189. References by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Not a very technical article, but interesting nonetheless.

    One thing that REALLY bugged me about the article is that it said "scientists" did this experiment, but DIDN'T say WHICH scientists, not naming people, the institution, the funding agency, etc.

    Makes it hard to find out more about the experiment.

    (At least they named the site where it was performed. So if the paper, excerpts, or another more complete report made it to the web we might be able to dig it out with a keyword search, rather than retreating to a library and digging out the medical and accoustic journals.)

    And then the media wonder why people no longer look to them for news...

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  190. Bizare? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    What qualifies this as a "BIZARE" experiment, and stated in both the article itself and the slashdot writeup?

    As stated in the article itself and as many other posts here have indicated, people have _knwon_ for quite a long time that ultralow frequency sound has an effect on people. So someone came up with an experiment to test exactly what that effect is, complete with control group and everything.

    Neither the thing they are testing nor the method used to test it seem particularly bizare to me.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  191. Letterman by srichman · · Score: 1

    Letterman also owns it.

  192. nethack? by SmileyByte · · Score: 1

    My emotions are affected by noises I cannot hear everytime I play nethack...

    You hear a jackal howling at the moon. --more--
    You hear a mumbled curse. --more--
    You hear a rushing sound. --more--
    It hits! It hits! It hits! --more--
    You hear the howling of the CwnAnnwn.

    This was "heard" in an ASCII screen. THAT made me shiver.

    --

    h@hh@hh@...@.&.... "You shall not pass!"
  193. talking dolls by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    While on the subject of cool vinyl tricks, supposedly (I haven't seen it), Monty Python had a comedy record with two intertwined spiral tracks. So when you played the same side, sometimes you'd get one track, and sometimes the other.

    That's how the pre-semiconductor string-pull talking dolls (starting with "Chatty Cathy") generated multiple sayings. Several spiral tracks, and the one you got depended on the disk position when the needle dropped onto the lead-in.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  194. The Neverending CD by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    The second-to-last thing you hear (or don't hear) is a very high audio frequency, lasting a few seconds... John Lennon said it was put there just to annoy your dog.

    Coincidentally, I heard the White Album and figured about half of it was entirely audible sounds put there just to annoy humans (-1, Troll).

    On CD, they play the loop a few times before ending the track

    Is there any theoretical reason they couldn't do the loop 'for real' on a CD and have it actually work on a normal player?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:The Neverending CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any theoretical reason they couldn't do the loop 'for real' on a CD and have it actually work on a normal player?

      yes, because there are no needles in a CD player. the laser moves on a track at a specific speed, depending on how far along the album is. it wouldn't get "stuck" in a loop.

  195. Hiss/whistle by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I have also experienced this [hearing "ultrasound"] in physics class, where a high voltage was being passed through a sphere painted with metallic paint. can anyone enlighten me as to how this ultrasonic side-effect occurs in the first place?

    If it's being continuously charged (i.e. a van de graff generator with a rubber belt) you'll get ultrasound because the corona discharge makes the system act like a relaxation oscilator:

    - Voltage rises until the ionization potential of the air is exceeded and the air molecules start breaking up, becoming conductive.
    - The ionized air leaks off charge until the voltage below the extinction potential, and the arc goes out.
    - Now the voltage rises again. Repeat indefinitely.

    Similar to the way a neon-lamp/capacator/resistor/DC power supply blinky-light works.

    The arc heats the air and causes it to rush away, creating a pressure wave. This is what you hear.

    The basic cycle will vary with the charging rate and geometry, but typically will be either a high whistle or ultrasonic.

    Both the exact timing of the individual arcs and their locations are somewhat random, and ionized gas is a negative resistance (higher current, more ionization, lower voltage) which amplifies any signal at any frequency, so random variations in anything that affects the voltage or current get amplified. People whose hearing quits at a frequency below the basic cyclic rate hear the "envelope" - the lower-frequency variations of the arcing - as a random-noise "hiss". People whose hearing extends up to the cyclic rate or beyond hear the whistle - with the random variations making the whistle sound somewhat hissy, like a breathy note on a flute.

    (Of course if the sphere was being charged by a flyback-like electronic high-voltage supply operating at a near-ultrasonic rate, like the flyback system in a TV or monitor, you might just be hearing the power supply, or the arcing happening at the peak of each charging cycle.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  196. Nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soundless music has been around for decades. Back at the BBC when the musicians went on strike, they
    often employed the talents of Adolphus Spriggs, a non-playing musician.

  197. a-HA! GOTCHA! by ekhben · · Score: 1

    "The most recent update from the UN Weapons Inspection team in Iraq has finally provided concrete evidence of weapons of mass destruction. All across the country, pipe organs and other infrasound weapons have been deployed, ready to transmit their deadly sounds to any nearby American citizens.

    When asked to comment, Saddam replied, 'What the fuck?'"

  198. You forgot to mention by nidarus · · Score: 1
    That this interesting piece of.. uh.. information.. was a comment in a code snippet that did just that - generated a 7Hz tone. I think it was to demonstrate Turbo C's PC-Speaker capabilities.

    I wonder if the people who wrote this example really had something against chickens.

  199. On the subject of Church Organs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually... I've noticed based on my study of world religions, their scriptures, personal observation at different worship services, and just talking to people that there's a big difference in music and denominations....

    For example, if you walk into a Roman Catholic Church, especially one where the Latin Mass is still being said, or one that still holds tightly to its history of traditional Catholic music in the service, you'll see that worship is fixed more on the Eucharist (the body and blood of Christ present before you). The focus isn't as much on how the individuals FEEL as much as it is focusing their minds and hearts towards worshipping God....

    Walk into a fundamental Christian Church (or any given protestant denomination (non denominational means protestant, if you think otherwise it's time to read some Church History books and learn the real history of Christianity) and you'll see people either jumping up and down, swaying in the pews, yelling and screaming, or just caught up in the loud 'praising' to rock, pop, or other such lively music of our times. Usually the so-called pastor will deliver (what the people attending may call) a lively sermon and you will hear the people talking more about the music and the sermons as the basis for their choice in choosing their Church - whereas the Catholics are more likely to tell you that the reason they are Catholic is due to many things, some being that (a) it is the Church founded by Christ, (b) the Eucharist is there - it is for worship. Yes, the music and a powerful homily helps, but worship is the reason they're there....

    With the Protestant/Fundamental Churches what you're more likely to see (when compared to the Catholic Mass) is people being entertained. "The music and the sermon" they say. They are entertained by the music, (they are more likely to focus on themselves and those around them during their service instead of focusing their attention on worshipping Christ) and they are entertained by the sermon. Chances are a great majority of them will walk out of their Protestant church feeling great from all the entertainment. Just as if they had attended a football game and cheered in the stands, chatted with friends, and their team won. A great many of them will NOT remember their pseudo-pastor's sermon, since it only served to envigorate them with the message for the moment....

    Many people feel Catholic Masses are too 'boring' or 'dismal' because there is less chance in many of the parishes of lively music and a firey sermon that jolts you. So a big majority of people will 'church hop' through Christian denominations and look for what fits (entertains) them the most. The problem is, these people have a serious lack of education when it comes to Christianity. They likely don't understand the real meaning of the word worship, or how to worship, so they confuse entertainment with worship. How many churches have you been to where they boast of having a TV in their same 'worship' space on Sunday for football and/or the superbowl? C'mon. In a Catholic Church such worship space is sacred, and for good reason. Most often they're the ones who believe their fundamental pseudo-pastor when they are told their Church was established by Christ. Wrong. Christ established the Catholic Church, and this is fact. Protestant/Non-denominational churches didn't exist until the 1500/1600's when Martin Luther broke away from his Catholicism. The waves of his split (and circulation of controversial pamphlets) are still felt today in the thousands of Protestant denominations we see today....

    My advice to those who would flame me because they enjoy the entertainment at their Protestant church is to: read the history of Christianity and study how worship existed in the East before it came to the West. Once you understand the real meaning behind worship, you'll see why a lot of Catholics leave Mass feeling good for different reasons. They weren't entertained. They were devoting their time to serious worship. The effect goes beyond mental/physical means and extends into the spiritual....

    I'm not saying the Protestant churches have zero value. You're still there to pray and sing to God. You exist to help and love one another. But since the 1600's, those who have broken away from the Catholic Church have seperated and watered down their services to the point that many of them appear more like pep rallies than worship services....

  200. Terrorists no, US Army Yes. by TastesLikeChicken · · Score: 1

    a) Infrasound (7-8hz 150+Decibles) is typically used as a NON-LETHAL weapon (for crowd control). However like most non-lethal weapons it can kill. Thus it is illegal throughout the US (AFAIK).
    b) untill recently Infrasound was very indiscriminate (anyone in earshot could be effected, and there is no "bullet proof" vest for the police to wear). Which made it hard to use. However HyperSonic Sound (http://www.atcsd.com/tl_hss.html) is working on a device for the US military that will have (very) directional capability. (http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/soni c_bullet020716.html)
    In a city region against terrorist, a weapon like this could be invaluable.
    c) I doubt terrorists would want to use this because it's
    1) not very portable (yet) it requires a BIG LONG tube to create infrasound.
    2) is (usually) non-lethal.

    --
    Until our children are no longer molded into castrated sheep democracy remains a fake and a danger. -A. S. Neill
  201. on the other side of the register... by Luke+the+Obscure · · Score: 1

    This kind of reminds of some of the research I read while investigating higher sample rates in recorded digital music. In the very recent past, proffesional music studios used to record in 48 kHz, and then dither down to 44.1 kHz (the sample rate of music CD's). The main disadvantage to this is that the highest recorded frequeny would be 24 kHz (this is due to the Nyquist Theorum), and CD's do not reproduce any sound above 22.05 kHz. Some research has been done showing that the inclusion of frequencies above 22.05 kHz, which are mostly inaudible, do in fact lead to increased activity in the brain. What this activity is, however, has not yet been identified.

  202. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff
    on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
    -- Linus Torvalds, about his failing hard drive on linux.cs.helsinki.fi

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...