Slashdot Mirror


CT Lottery to Offer PC Game

nstrom writes "The Connecticut State Lottery is giving out a PC game (for Windows, presumably) with their new scratch-off lottery tickets which offer a chance of winning $25,000 by playing. This news article from the Hartford Courant mentions that the game might be targeted at children, but there's no mention of any problems involving software cracking, which is what I immediately thought of. I'm sure there are some bored crackers out there who'd tackle this for a chance at some cash. What do you think?"

301 comments

  1. I'm waiting for this to come out for PS/2 by cindik · · Score: 0, Funny

    or Xbox.

  2. Outrageous by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think it's unconscionable that Connecticut is having a lottery offering crack for children to raise cash.

    I'm going to call up my radio station immediately and express my opinion about this obscenity.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Outrageous by arcmay · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure there are some bored crackers out there who'd tackle this for a chance at some cash.

      [In Chris Rock voice:]
      Crazy cracker-ass-crackers. They always tryin' to beat the lotto and steal the cash from non-internet havin' brothas. Cracka-ass-crackers!
      [End Chris Rock voice]

    2. Re:Outrageous by sconeu · · Score: 1


      What's that you say? Oh, that's very different... Never Mind.
      </VOICE>

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Outrageous by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      But with TCPA, nobody will be able to crack it anyway... (or more precisely, nobody will be able to *run* a cracked copy)
      I think this program will require everything from the BIOS to the OS to have the right crypptographic signatures...

  3. Lottery: def by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lottery
    english - noun
    def 1. A tax on people who suck at math.

    (I admit, stolen from a bumpersticker, but I think it's funny :))

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Lottery: def by swb · · Score: 1

      This is right, and I laugh every time some state legislator argues we should set up some new casino or game to raise money for some project that can't get funding otherwise.

      I'm not sure if they think people will gamble more or if those places print money behind the scenes. I'm guessing the latter.

    2. Re:Lottery: def by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually it's the way the state gets it's welfare money back.

    3. Re:Lottery: def by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You forgot option #3 - whether or not people end up gambling more, the legislator is sure to get a nice, steady stream of campaign contributions for his efforts to "provide funding for such needy causes."

      You'll notice that gambling initiatives never are proposed to fund highway development or the general fund. They're always "earmarked" (a bogus term that any accountant can get around) for education, welfare, etc.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually not true. People can have rational preferences over wealth levels that imply they should play the lottery, even though the expected return is negative.

    5. Re:Lottery: def by tmark · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Lottery...def 1. A tax on people who suck at math.

      I hope, for consistency's sake, you don't have any insurance policies.

    6. Re:Lottery: def by TXH-88 · · Score: 1

      You're a first year economics student aren't you?

    7. Re:Lottery: def by Santos+L.+Halper · · Score: 1

      I'm not required by law to play the lottery. I am required to have insurance.

      --

      "Ask not for whom the bone bones. It bones for thee." --Bender
    8. Re:Lottery: def by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "A tax on people who suck at math."

      A person with a lottery ticket has infinitely more chances of winning than a person that has none. So nyeah!

    9. Re:Lottery: def by kafka93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No.. a person with a lottery ticket has *one* more chance of winning than a person that has one.

      Q.E.D.

    10. Re:Lottery: def by kafka93 · · Score: 1

      Erm, than a person that has none. *sigh*

    11. Re:Lottery: def by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I remember when I learned statistics waAAAaaay back in high school, figured out my Dad's chances of winning the million dollar prize and went home and informed him how "stupid" he was for playing.

      He sighed and told me that for 1 dollar a week he could day dream about winning the millions, retiring before he was 40 and doing everything he ever wanted to do in his life but couldn't because he had been kicked out of the house at 15 and had to get a real job instead of going to school and learning statistics. It was a pretty cheap day dream.

      I still occassionally buy lottery tickets to this day :-)

    12. Re:Lottery: def by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      " No.. a person with a lottery ticket has *one* more chance of winning than a person that has (n)one."

      How many non-players would it take for the group of them to have the same chance of winning as a single ticket-holder? What does n/0 approach again?

    13. Re:Lottery: def by CaptainStormfield · · Score: 1

      I hope that you're not risk adverse, i.e. that your marginal utility per dollar does not decline as you accumulate more dollars!

      --
      "The dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program." - Niven
    14. Re:Lottery: def by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      Not the point. The person with a ticket may have infinitely more chance, or probability - but only one more chance... (or one more chance per ticket, anyway).

      "Chances" as in a count noun is not the same as probability.

    15. Re:Lottery: def by EvanED · · Score: 1

      He's talking absolute difference, no ratio.

    16. Re:Lottery: def by swb · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that gambling initiatives never are proposed to fund highway development or the general fund.

      Until now! Our own Dick Day (as in "Dick Day before he dicks you") is proposing just that.

      Around here we have a lot of Indian casinos, and usually the new gambling proposals are either casinos sited a lot closer than Indian casinos or some kind of statewide thing that wouldn't entail a lot of travel. The Indians complain because they know the market for throwing away money is finite and it will drain customers.

    17. Re:Lottery: def by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      That has been my point.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    18. Re:Lottery: def by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 3, Funny

      You make fun of welfare recipients yet you can't spell "its."

      That's right! Before we even approach the problem of getting people off of welfare, we need to correct the problem of people occasionally mistakenly using "its" instead of "it's"; for that is the real problem facing America!

      spell-checked to avoid the pedantic nit-pickings of spelling/grammar-nazis

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    19. Re:Lottery: def by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      A person with a lottery ticket has almost certainly already lost. All he has is the recipt for the stupid tax.

    20. Re: Lottery: def by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > How many non-players would it take for the group of them to have the same chance of winning as a single ticket-holder? What does n/0 approach again?

      What is the expected gain for a group of 1000 non-players as compared to a group of 1000 players?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    21. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chances" as in a count noun is not the same as probability.

      According to the Dictionary, specifically definition 2: "The likelihood of something happening; possibility or probability. Often used in the plural.".

      Keep an open mind and don't assume superiority so readily.

    22. Re:Lottery: def by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, the original poster was correct in the use of "it's". He said "It's the way..." meaning "It is the way...". He was not using the possessive pronoun "its".

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    23. Re:Lottery: def by geekee · · Score: 1

      it's is short for it is.
      its is possessive for it.
      the parent used "it's" correctly, I believe

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    24. Re:Lottery: def by geekee · · Score: 1

      Actually, only got the 1st "it's" right.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    25. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, he used it's twice. The first usage was correct, but the second was not.

    26. Re:Lottery: def by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      How exactly does making fun of welfare recipients "approach the problem of getting people off of welfare?"

    27. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      getting people off of welfare

      Grammar check: Failed... :-)

    28. Re:Lottery: def by Frac · · Score: 1

      You make fun of welfare recipients yet you can't spell "its."

      And according to the laws in the planet you're from, you can't make fun of welfare recipients if your grammar is not perfect?

    29. Re:Lottery: def by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1
      How exactly does making fun of welfare recipients "approach the problem of getting people off of welfare?"

      hmmm, ask a stupid rhetorical question and... well... I'll go back to being a smart-ass :)

      I drew that implication, using your reasoning as the premise, as a joke to make fun of you. My thinking went like this:

      1. This guy stated: You make fun of welfare recipients yet you can't spell "its."
      2. This is a cut if misspelling "it's" puts you on, at best, equal ground with someone on welfare and thus implies that you are not in a position to criticize a person on welfare. Therefore, given that this person isn't making this post for absolutely no reason, they must be assuming that this premise is true.
      3. OK, this guy seems to think that he can make this person look dumb with this reasoning. I disagree, so as a joke, I shall further and exaggerate this line of reasoning.
      4. [magnitude_of_problem(spelling errors) >= magnitude_of_problem(being on welfare)] implies [importance_of_solving_problem(spelling errors) >= importance_of_solving_problem(being on welfare)]
      5. OK, now I'll just come up with an amusing way to make this into english to discredit his reasoning, 'cause I'm really sick of this kinda (spelling == accountability) crap


      Does that help answer your question? I wasn't too far of with my assumptions, was I?
      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    30. Re:Lottery: def by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 1

      I apologize for my spelling error. I will try not to let it happen again.

    31. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      The correct spelling is "it's."

      See http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000227.htm

    32. Re:Lottery: def by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      A person with a lottery ticket has infinitely more chances of winning than a person that has none. So nyeah!

      Correct. We buy a few buck worth a week. Its cheap entertainment, no hangover, and moderately legal.

      To be honest, we don't have the lotto in this state, so we drive an hour to another state to buy them once a week. And if it comes to a vote here, I will vote against it. I saw what happened in TX when it first came in. It became a tax on the poor. Call it what you will, but I prefer NO lotto here so only those that can drive a bit can get them, not every welfare mom that just need to walk to the corner Circle K store.
      Same reason I fly to Vegas, but don't want casino gambling here (NIMBY syndrome I guess)

      So its simple, we need a law to make it so everyone must buy lotto tickets out of state but not in your own state, so poor people can't buy them and get poorer. :-)

      Sucks to be right when it sounds that bad.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    33. Re:Lottery: def by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually it's the way the state gets it's welfare money back....

      Before we even approach the problem of getting people off of welfare, we need to correct the problem of people occasionally mistakenly using "its" instead of "it's"; for that is the real problem facing America!

      "Occasionally" and "mistakenly" are both adverbs. Stylistic suggestion: "...people occasionally using 'its' instead of 'it's' by mistake...." Also, you may want to insert commas when beginning a sentence with an adverb such as "also" or "actually."

      What, I don't get a "70% Funny" like the original poster? We can mock the poor but we can't make light of someone who has not mastered his native language?

      For discussion: have you ever visited a casino (especially towards the first of the month)? How do we solve the problem of getting the elderly off of Social Security?

    34. Re: Lottery: def by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      What is the expected gain for a group of 1000 non-players as compared to a group of 1000 players?

      The non-players should do better by approximately $1000. :)

      Personally, I prefer three-card monty. My chances of winning are effectively the same as if I played the lottery, and at least I get to be entertained by some high-quality sleight-of-hand and (usually) a good line of patter as well. :)

    35. Re:Lottery: def by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Six words:

      Judge not lest ye be judged.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    36. Re:Lottery: def by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      You make fun of welfare recipients yet you can't spell "its."

      I probably shouldn't continue this nit-picking of grammar, but I can't help it. (-1, Offtopic)


      Since your post is a compound sentence, it should have a comma after recipients. You meant to type 'You make fun of welfare recipients, yet you can't spell "its."'.

    37. Re:Lottery: def by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      What a wonderful story...I always pay out on people (funny enough, using the same maths related def as above)...I never will again. Thanks for the unique perspective.

    38. Re:Lottery: def by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      No.. a person with a lottery ticket has *one* more chance of winning than a person that has one.

      Sigh Please remove Q.E.D from ur signature. I was breaking my head over a divine meaning behind that Typo!

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    39. Re:Lottery: def by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Occasionally" and "mistakenly" are both adverbs. Stylistic suggestion: "...people occasionally using 'its' instead of 'it's' by mistake...."

      I would prefer "on occasion". Please collect your gold star at the teacher's desk.

      You missed the relevant error: "its" and "it's" should be transposed.

      Also, you may want to insert commas when beginning a sentence with an adverb such as "also" or "actually."

      Actually, that wasn't me.

      I'm surprised you didn't note that I shouldn't begin sentences with prepositions, or my improper use of the word "even".

      What, I don't get a "70% Funny" like the original poster?

      No, because your post isn't funny. It's just a bunch of nitpicking in what I can only assume is an attempt at irony. The gist of my post is that nitpicking over grammar is pedantic. You nitpicked my grammar. That's not funny, it's missing the point. It would have been ironic if I had been stating that grammar was important while making those mistakes.

      We can mock the poor but we can't make light of someone who has not mastered his native language?

      Oh shit, I failed the authoritative "Permission-Denied English Mastery Test". Now how will I get into grad-school?

      For discussion: have you ever visited a casino (especially towards the first of the month)?

      nope.

      How do we solve the problem of getting the elderly off of Social Security?

      I'll let you know after I master my native language. I'm not sure I have the grammar to attempt such a feat.

      --
      "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    40. Re: Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK here is easily the most petulant post of all time but please know I have the best intentions.

      It's spelled "Three Card Monte".

      Sorry for being a dick, but I was born that way.

    41. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Go back to being a smart-ass? You never stopped.

      And you still can't spell!

    42. Re:Lottery: def by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

      But that's what's evil about the Lottery. It sells daydreams to people who are too poor to afford real ones.

      Lots of people play the lottery multiple times, every day, looking for that dream. If they took that money and invested it, they could retire years earlier. If they spend it on night school, the could get a better job and have a chance at making those dreams come true. If they spend it on college for their kids....well, you get they point. But they don't. They spend it on the Lotto because they don't know any better.

      Spending a buck a week on a dream is a good deal. Spending grocery money on the lotto because "This time, I'm gonna win fer sure!" is a scam...run by the government, and it's not right.

    43. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, what i really wonder is whether this is marked +5 Insightful instead of the type or because of it... (g)

    44. Re:Lottery: def by DEBEDb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's all nice among us nerds, but it's
      really equivalent to:

      TV - a subtle way to extract money
      (via advertisement - see "brainwashing") from
      people who don't know better.

      Even so, the analogy is as flawed as most of them :)

      Did it ever occur to you that people may like
      to gamble
      , regardless of the odds? The
      money that they may lose due to odds not being
      in their favor can thus be considered money
      they'd spend on a flight to, say, Florida, to
      lie on the beach all day. What is the difference,
      really?

      I don't like to gamble - it's just not my thing -
      but my parents do, about once a year. They are
      professionals (not pro-gamblers :),
      earning money in that old-fashinoned way, and
      the gambling is just another variant on "lying on
      the beach sipping cocktails all day".

      Is there really a difference here? I think not.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    45. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judge not lest ye be judged

      That's from Herbaliser. On a COMPLETELY irrelevent note... they rock!

    46. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was from jesus...

    47. Re:Lottery: def by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
      Very true. Because he worked hard (sometimes 2 or three jobs) and saved his money my Dad retired at 53 (13 years after his dream date :-) and has been fishing and hunting every since.

      I've seen people ahead of me in checkout lines buying $100 worth of lottery tickets who I know can't afford that. If they took that $5200 a year and put into savings ...

    48. Re:Lottery: def by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    49. Re:Lottery: def by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      This is a cut if misspelling "it's" puts you on, at best, equal ground with someone on welfare and thus implies that you are not in a position to criticize a person on welfare.

      The poster was making fun of the intelligence of those on welfare. Welfare is not based on lack of intelligence. Poor grammar is (at least somewhat). I was making no statement about the importance of the problem.

    50. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second one.

    51. Re:Lottery: def by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      Q: How do we solve the problem of getting the elderly off of Social Security?

      A: Send all of our kids to China.

      Personally, [note correct use of comma after leading adverb] I've never quite understood the whole concept of "Youth-in-Asia", [note incorrect placement of comma outside of quotes, as techies are want to do] but this seems to be the textbook answer.
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    52. Re:Lottery: def by Frank+White · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. Did you expect him to read all the way to the end of the sentence?

      --

      Custer's Revenge: The greatest video

    53. Re:Lottery: def by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      There is a story that when the Italian government first proposed a lottery the Catholic Church made its objection to state run gambling known. The Revenue Minister reassured the Papal Nuncio, saying that the lottery was not gambling but rather a tax on imbeciles. . . Eschew Obfuscation!

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    54. Re:Lottery: def by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's right! Before we even approach the problem of getting people off of welfare, we need to correct the problem of people occasionally mistakenly using "its" instead of "it's"; for that is the real problem facing America!


      Doesn't that bug you! Each spelling error I see flies out at me and bites me in the face, it really sucks. The sad part is, I spell better than you guys and English is my 3rd Language. There's tons of spell checkers out there, and yet, the spelling everywhere gets worse and worse. But I digress. I am looking for a chance to crack that software just for fun.
    55. Re:Lottery: def by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      As in "I'll take my chances" which is non-count.

      You can't say "There are many chances" when using the word to mean probability - the best you can say are "The chances are high" or "The chances are good".

      Unfortunately, as this is a point of grammar, the dictionary wasn't so useful.

  4. No wait, you don't understand it by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the government doing it, so that means there's nothing wrong with it. Quoth Reverend Lovejoy:

    Once something has been approved by the Government, It's no longer immoral.

    Of course, it would be wrong for private individuals to run gambling operations, just like it's wrong for individuals to steal...

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Of course, it would be wrong for private individuals to run gambling operations

      Uhhh, you've heard of Las Vegas, right? Reno? Atlantic City?

    2. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Native Americans run their own casinos and bingo halls, up here in Canada. They're completely independent of the government.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    3. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      Ah, but those are all government approved and regulated gambling institutions. Plus (in Nevada anyway) the government takes 7% off the top (not nearly enough).

    4. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by shdragon · · Score: 1
      Native Americans run their own casinos and bingo halls, up here in Canada. They're completely independent of the government.


      Well, down here in the good ole states, everyone's gotta pay tha man.

      --
      "...we dont care about the economics; we just want to be able to hack great stuff."
    5. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      They do that in the US, too, but only because they are given sovreignty within the reserves, as an effort to assuage national guilt and appease conscience.

    6. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by noblee · · Score: 1

      um, plus here in CT we have 2 huge casinos... and the government does skim the profits, but then again, the tribes contribute ENORMOUSLY to the traffic and thus cost the state money. while the state may make money off of this, it is sort of like a tax on cigarettes or other "sins." sorry, I had to sit through the governor's budget address today and am a little tired of listening to the complaints about taxes (damned internship).

    7. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      They do that in the US, too, but only because they are given sovreignty within the reserves...


      Given sovereignty?

      -- this is not a .sig
    8. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      Yes, the indians are bad.

      At least the friggin mohegans helped pay for that nifty highway shebang. The Mashentuckets are bitching because noone wants to pay for road widening required for their drunk patrons to safely get there, lose money, and leave.

      I'm sorry if this is flamebait, but my house lost about $100k value when the Mashentuckets moved in. It was originally worth somewhere around $200k. That's half of what my house was worth when we bought it. Plus the ghetto blaster music, the dog fights, the drugs, and pretty much all the signs of the poor that recently got rich.
      Yah, I'm sorry, I'm just bitter.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    9. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Yes, given. After it was taken away. It certainly wasn't left for them as part of the original plan.

    10. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by Rosey · · Score: 1

      Actually, the whole of federal Indian law is based on the "reserved rights doctrine". The sovereignty exercised by Indian tribes was not given to them by anyone. Tribes retain all of the powers of a sovereign except those that have been surrendered by treaty, clearly abrogated by the Federal govt, or are inconsistent with the tribes' status (as lesser sovereigns under the ultimate control of the Federal govt).

      This doctrine dates to the 1832 Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia and has been the foundation of federal Indian law for the past 170 years.

      That Indians' rights are those that they reserved, not those that they were given, is reflected in the term "Indian reservation".

    11. Re:No wait, you don't understand it by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Hm. I guess I misunderstood.

      I figured we took all of the land and claimed it as our own, and then later reserved land for them (perhaps before developing on it ourselves). To me, that seems like we gave it to them, but I might be wrong about the facts.

  5. The lottery is still a better investment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...than hardware manufacturers.

  6. Play the game enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I *click* play enough, will I finally be able to *click* hit that *click* stupid *click* monkey.

  7. Many games already do this by Doctor+Sbaitso · · Score: 3, Funny

    which offer a chance of winning $25,000 by playing

    Is it real money... or do they just show your character with a $25,000 cheque and some text that says "You are the winner!" with some cheesy background music?

    --

    ---
    Hello, Slashdot user. My name is Dr. Sbaitso. I am here to help you.
    1. Re:Many games already do this by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "or do they just show your character with a $25,000 cheque and some text that says "You are the winner!" with some cheesy background music?"

      Could be worse. Could be "Money Tree Money" that's only redeemable at certain "special" websites.

    2. Re:Many games already do this by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      No, you win $25,000 Banana Bucks (tm)

      *cough*actualcashvalueonetenthofonecent*cough*

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:Many games already do this by Prep__ · · Score: 0

      which would still be worth 250 so its not too bad

    4. Re:Many games already do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, I think they were talking about the total value...so it's not that great.

  8. Why not? Earn money based on skill by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It seems that this is the basic theory in this - maybe i'm missunderstanding, but it doesn't really seem like a lottery at all - sort of a quake3 tournament for people that don't have the skill to play quake3, or aren't inherently good at fast reflex requiring games.

    I bet if there was a game like Diablo 2 where some sort of cash reward was involved, but it was a pay to play service like EQ, many many people would get very hooked on it. HEY DON'T STEAL MY IDEA ****patent pending****

  9. On the subject of lottery... by J0hn+Carm4ck · · Score: 0

    Don't swallow a little spunk, swallow a lotto!

    --
    John Carmack
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seems like there would be some legal issues with this as CT has state laws against on-line gambling. Most states do, for that matter.

    1. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Seems like there would be some legal issues with this as CT has state laws against on-line gambling. Most states do, for that matter.

      Surprisingly enough, when governments make laws against things they claim to not like, they usually leave nice big exemptions for themselves in those very same laws. Gun laws area great example of this.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    2. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I hope it is. Maybe it will establish a precident that online betting isn't so evil, and the US can stop wasting money prosecuting casino and sportsbook owners.

    3. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Informative
      Seems like there would be some legal issues with this as CT has state laws against on-line gambling. Most states do, for that matter.
      Which, I'd imagine, is precisely why this computer game doesn't connect to the internet. Diane Patterson from the CT state lottery summed it up in the article: "To have Internet gambling you have to be on the Internet."
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    4. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by EvlG · · Score: 1

      The problem with online gambling is regulation.

      How do you ensure it is fair for the people who choose to take part in it?

    5. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Being as I have been making most of my free money lately buying stuff at estate sales and selling it on ebay, I say 'all power to them!'

      I am not stupid enough to gamble, but those who are have lots of fine posessions that I can bid on by the skid at auctions when their household is being liquidated.

      Plus, stupid taxes lower the taxes of the clueful.

    6. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I tend to be more concerned with the sportsbetting end of things in my quest for legalized online gambling. This isn't such an issue in that arena, as the results can't (easily) be fixed.

      You are correct that online casino games are a whole seperate bag.

      I see no reason why online sportsbetting shouldn't be legal, however.

    7. Re:Shouldn't this be construed as on-line betting? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Why should fairness in gambling be regulated? The people participating are greedy - they're hoping to make easy money with no effort. So what if they lose it. Sometimes greed bites ya.

  12. Sounds like a trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conspiracy theory: tempt the unethical computer gurus to get themselves imprisoned before the coming new world order takes hold.

    It's possible! *X-Files theme*

  13. I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by loucura! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I seriously doubt that every cd will be "winable", more likely, they have a limited run of "winable" cd's, followed by a larger run of cd's with limited winnings (like five or ten dollars), which the majority of scratch-off "winnings" are.

    They'll probably have one cd that can win the "grand prize", and that one is probably at the bottom of the St. Charles River in Quebec.

    --
    Black and grey are both shades of white.
    1. Re:I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1
      I seriously doubt that every cd will be "winable", more likely, they have a limited run of "winable" cd's, followed by a larger run of cd's with limited winnings (like five or ten dollars), which the majority of scratch-off "winnings" are.

      Oh, you mean like the article says?

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    2. Re:I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by loucura! · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was commenting on the write-up, that states that "crackers" are going to win all the money.

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    3. Re:I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they should partner with AOL to piggy-back on their CDs. :)

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    4. Re:I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by lostchicken · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but this is Slashdot. Here, we post articles, but don't ever read them. Instead we have debates about what they probably say.

      --
      -twb
    5. Re:I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      If you post an article about a subject, but don't actually read it, quantum mechanics states that the article will be a superposition of all possible articles about the subject. Hmm, maybe I can use that to sue someone for libel. I should patent that, "A Method for Gaining Money Through the Application of Quantum Mechanics to Internet Journalism and Civil Law". I should work for amazon.com.

    6. Re:I think it's just an animated "scratch-off" by robotbrain · · Score: 1

      *putting on rubber boots*
      Could you tell me around WHERE in the St. Charles River in Quebec?

  14. This is only fair. by Mothra+the+III · · Score: 3, Funny

    Camel Joe shouldn't have a monopoly on inappropriate advertising aimed at children. Nice to be able to have a smoke while you are gambling, kids!

    --
    Worst. Sig. Ever.
  15. Deal cut by which distributor? by Wino · · Score: 0

    Publishers have been selling lottery tickets to small game developers for decades now. The general public should get their shot! =)

  16. Can you blame them though? by zachjb · · Score: 1

    Seriously though. They have a skill and need money, so why not combine the two and find out how to make the money.

    I suppose people would look at this as stealing, but in actuality it is just survival of the fittest.

    --

    --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
    1. Re:Can you blame them though? by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Probably better odds elsewhere. After having actually seen what passes for security in the online gambling industry all you need really is a java decompilor.

      Many of the online casino games tell the server whether it won or lost. And on one particularly funny case the game connected right to the SQL server at the casino.

      The first place I worked did better with a flash/php combo but theve never bothered to upgrade apache or ssl since I quit.

      It's quite sad really I'm supprised these places don't get ripped off more often.

    2. Re:Can you blame them though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isnt everything survival of the fittest then?

  17. What do I think? by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What do you think?

    It sounds dumb, that's what I think. But I wouldn't worry about crackers (people trying to crack the game and win the cash kind of crackers). They state the odds are 1 in 260,000. This is their business and you damn well better believe they won't be paying out more than that.

    Even if they are foolish enough to let out a game that can easily be cracked (doubtful, they'll probably just put an encryped code on the winning CDs and check it when you come to redeem), they can refuse the prize at any time. So if too many people come to redeem it, "Sorry, we're paid out. Read the fine print, go home."

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    1. Re:What do I think? by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Can you think of any cracker that would submit their cracked code, try to claim the winnings but in the process have to go through all the legal steps required? Having scrutiny by The Man(tm) as soon as they are announced as winners?

      What a great tie in for the FBI. Convince many states to hold computer aided lotterys. "Rig" the lottery so that a medium to advanced cracker had a guarenteed winning game. Then swoop in an monitor all the winners interactions online, IRL, etc.

      robi

  18. Odds by Yo+Grark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think my odds of cracking the software are better than winning the lottery!

    Yo Grark
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Odds by telstar · · Score: 1

      I thought zero was equal to zero....

  19. Lotto by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny

    All you need is a dollar and a dream...

    ...and Window XP
    DirectX 9.0
    64 megs of ram
    A 3D accelerated video card
    A sound card
    A mouse
    A keyboard

  20. Cracking not possible by Dragon218 · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have these in Louisville. Basically you buy a scratch-off ticket with a serial number on it. You enter that into the computer game and click the shiny buttons. Then, after wasting 10 minutes, find out what your prize is. Then you take the ticket to your local gas station and tell them it's a winner. They scan it and give you $3 or so.

    I suppose you could put in serial numbers until you find the $25,000 winner. You wouldn't get anything out of it.

    --

    "It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
    1. Re:Cracking not possible by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      So what does CT get out of it but interest from people?

      [don tinfoil hat]

      Perhaps there's something in the EULA to collect personal information and/or check for 'illegal activity'?

      [/hat]

    2. Re:Cracking not possible by 00klaDM0k · · Score: 1

      Does it require an internet connection?

    3. Re:Cracking not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it requires to have the right ticket to present to the gas station...

    4. Re:Cracking not possible by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could put in serial numbers until you find the $25,000 winner. You wouldn't get anything out of it.

      Are the serial numbers distributed in some predictable order? Once you have the winning serial number, then you can find the store which is distributing that serial number.

    5. Re:Cracking not possible by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      and then you could blow $30,000 buying all the tickets until you find the right one. that's assuming, of course, that they keep track and publish which store has what ticket numbers, which would be very, very stupid of them.

    6. Re:Cracking not possible by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      So what's to stop someone from scratching off the ticket and just bringing it straight to the local gas station? The most they can do is tell you it isn't a winner. That way you wouldn't have to install their bloated adware on your already unstable copy of Windows 98 just to recover $3 of the $33 you already spent on the stupid things...

      On the second point, even if you were to put in serial numbers until you found the $25,000 winner, then what? You still don't have the ticket you'd need to turn into the local gas station. And you can bet they're going to examine the "big winnner" very carefully to make sure it's authentic!

    7. Re:Cracking not possible by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it basically says that in the article. I wish submitters would actually READ them before they type their synopsis.

    8. Re:Cracking not possible by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they don't publish it, but that doesn't mean you couldn't figure it out.

    9. Re:Cracking not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's to stop someone from scratching off the ticket and just bringing it straight to the local gas station? The most they can do is tell you it isn't a winner.

      This is the parent's point. A lottery involving a computer game is just the same as a regular lottery, except it gives you an excuse to play a computer game. Kind of ridiculous, really: does someone who wants to play computer games need an excuse so badly?

      Also a little dangerous, as it provides a mechanism to let lottery players-disproportionately drawn the poorest and least educated segment of society--get their kids involved/hooked at an early age.

    10. Re:Cracking not possible by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I had a friend in high school who used to play the scratch tickets and ended ahead, since in the state at the time the wining tickets were generally printed in groups, so the cashier at his hangout would tell him when to buy from a roll that had had several large winners.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    11. Re:Cracking not possible by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      I remember Coke did some "code under the cap" game in the mid 90s when I was being exposed to all the HACKER.TXT files from BBSs and I was young and impressionable. So I decided to wardial the coke codes. They had an 800 number you call and enter codes to see what you won. Surprisingly, after about 30 codes, I hit the code (a code?) that won the grand prize. Now, either it was freak statistics, or the codes just followed some algorithm to determine prizes. In any case, it was cool hearing the phone message that the grand prize winners will hear, but without the winning cap, it was useless information.

      I suspect this is similar in implementation.

    12. Re:Cracking not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way to know if a ticket is a winner is if the lottery database was cracked, since each ticket has an identifying number on the back. Only then can you look at a ticket without scratching it off to determine if it's a winner.

      Even if you did crack the software, the only way to "win" is to have a ticket with the right combination of numbers, which you have to scratch off to find anyway. Cracking the program and discovering any of the combinations is just mental masturbation.

  21. Bored? by dotgod · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm sure there are some bored crackers out there who'd tackle this for a chance at some cash.

    If there's $25k involved, I'm sure even a cracker who wasn't bored would give it a shot.

  22. Crackers by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I read the article and it's pretty vague on how the game actually informs you of a payoff -- if all of the games are the same and give a chance at winning, you can bet that this will be cracked in less than 24 hours.

    It seems like the best way to do this would be *not* having some random chance of any given game winning, but instead link in a seperate module for 1 in 260000 that has a cash redemption code at the end or some such. In other words, have a 'loser' version, and a 'winner' version, with none of the winner's code in the losing version.

  23. Connecticut Lottery Game by chubso · · Score: 1

    My guess? I doubt that the game is issued with win encrypted. It cannot be how well you play the game, just that some games are set up to allow the player to win. Only those games will win, and they will win every time. Cracking makes no sense if all the disk has is a game that runs you around with no link to the money. Either that ot they are really looking to get hacked.

  24. We've had this for a while... by eisbar1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Western Canada anyway... Western Canada Lotto Corp. It's bloody expensive for a scratch-ticket type game though. $8 to get in, and $4 for each additional ticket. Eisbar

    1. Re:We've had this for a while... by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      We have it in Quebec as well. They give out the CD's for free and the tickets are $4 each.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    2. Re:We've had this for a while... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but isn't that like 75 cents US? j/k

  25. Target: Children by handy_vandal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course it's targeted at children. Only a child would expect to win the lottery.

    "The Lottery: When You Need Millions of Dollars, Right Away!"

    --
    -kgj
  26. Lottery Winner Hit By Meteorite!! by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    There's a universe where that happens.

  27. It does sound pretty sketchy... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    considering it's centered around a cartoon character. Didn't the CT lottery learn anything from Joe Camel - that cartoon characters and vices don't go together?

    I've always found it ironic that gambling is so bad that it needs to be illegal in most places, yet it's OK for state governments to run lotteries - which probably offer worse odds than legal games would. Sounds like rent seeking behavior to me.

  28. Hacking potential doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'm pretty sure the element of chance is not in the game, it is in the CD. Each CD has a hardcoded id code associated with it (probably located all throughout the CD). Only way to hack it is to get the list of wining id's, crack the id coding scheme, buy $100,000 worth of professional CD equipment, and make a "corrected" id copy.

  29. Re:Why not? Earn money based on skill by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're probably pre-determined. They state odds, 1 in 260,000. I doubt they can predict people's "skillz." You have no more chance of winning this by skill than you do playing scratch off bingo. You know, "Damn, I was so close, next time I'll scratch off the "B" column first. I can effect the outcome of a pre-printed lottery card..."

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  30. Cartoons gambling is mmmbad, mmkay? by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "You cannot say it is not related to children when you use cartoon figures. It's obvious children will gamble with this product," Steinberg said. "There should be no cartoon figures in any form of gambling."

    That sounds rather ridiculous. There have been many Simpson's episodes in which Homer, Marge, and even Bart have gambled. Not that that makes it right, but there is quite a precedent with cartoons gambling. There are much bigger things to worry about.

    --
    Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    1. Re:Cartoons gambling is mmmbad, mmkay? by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      There have been many Simpson's episodes in which Homer, Marge, and even Bart have gambled. Not that that makes it right, but there is quite a precedent with cartoons gambling. There are much bigger things to worry about.

      But, nonetheless, in all of those episodes we see harmful consequences due to their gambling. You think we'll see that in this game? Mmnah.

      -T

    2. Re:Cartoons gambling is mmmbad, mmkay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up and quit pretending to be a karma-whoring girl, dumb-ass.

  31. Not Funny. Sad by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    But even sadder is that it is true. And this is being put out by the State, no less.

    1. Re:Not Funny. Sad by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      State governments probably get more net profit from tobacco sales than the tobacco companies themselves. Anybody ever run those numbers?

    2. Re:Not Funny. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone did (I forget who). State and Federal governments get a larger take on tobacco sales than the tobacco companies.

      Remember you anti-smoking Nazis, it it your patriotic duty to smoke. At least 3 packs per day. If you don't the terrorists have already won. You will also help save Social Security.

    3. Re:Not Funny. Sad by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      From "net profit", subtract the medical expenses and loss of taxes to the government from the people who get cancer, it's probably not a profit at all. On the other hand, I've heard it argued that by killing of people in their 60s, they save on benefits.

    4. Re:Not Funny. Sad by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Run the numbers. You are likely to find out the income from tobacco sales beats the entire medical budget....

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    5. Re:Not Funny. Sad by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You say "you are likely to find". So you're just guessing too. I'm "sure" the costs of smoking are far more than the benefits, unless one plays with numbers to hide the costs, or transfer them to others. Here's one page which puts cost/benefit at 10:1, the author has an axe to grind, but he backs it up.

      From Cigarettes: A Huge Cost to Society:
      Smoking as of 2002, costs Americans $157.4 billion per year. The annual amount is about $3,391 per person. Each pack leads to medical costs. Each pack reduces productivity. The total per-pack cost is calculated at $7.18. -- U.S. Centers for Disease Control.
      Some people say this is all just "opinion." But think about it, the mathematical calculation aspect. Add up the costs of the tobacco-related medical care, divide by number of packs.
      As each pack costs smokers far less than the actual cost impact on America, nonsmokers pay the difference. Nonsmokers pay the difference via increased taxes and insurance premiums.
      For this reason alone, the per-pack tax should be $7.18. States receive only about $16 billion a year from tobacco taxes and the widely touted Attorney-General-initiated settlement. This is barely 10% of the aforesaid costs.

      The Centers for Disease Control has much more on this.

    6. Re:Not Funny. Sad by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      You seem to be forgetting 1 thing, though...."export". American companies sell cigarettes all over the world without having to deal with the consequences...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:Not Funny. Sad by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      American companies sell cigarettes all over the world without having to deal with the consequences...

      As I said earlier, "unless one plays with numbers to hide the costs, or transfer them to others."

      So some states that export massive amoounts of tobacco may come out ahead on that basis. It's fucking evil and immoral, though. My mother smoked a pack a day, and died of cancer. So I have an axe to grind...

  32. You can't lose if you don't play by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the article..."There is a one-in-260,000 chance of winning $25,000 in the game"

    That means each chance is "worth" about 9.6 cents. That's some pretty long odds for not-so-great money, and I'll bet it ends up costing alot more than 10 cents a try.

    1. Re:You can't lose if you don't play by mosch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, there are a number of other prizes as well, but yes, the house take on a lottery is completely insane, usually somewhere in the neighborhood of 50%.

      If you actually want to win $25k, you're better off going to Vegas, putting $25 down on black, then hoping black comes up ten times in a row. The odds of that working are only about one in 1200 or so, depending if you're playing on a single zero or double zero wheel.

      Sure you can't do it as often, but that's for the best anyway, isn't it?

    2. Re:You can't lose if you don't play by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      You could also do a little better by heading over to the craps table and betting pass or no pass 10 times in a row.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:You can't lose if you don't play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in most states, the lottery has a 65-75% payout. The odds of winning your money back are between 1:3.5 and 1:5 usually depending on the number of prizes in the game. Then from the remaining money, the lottery has to pay for the printing of the game, has to give the retailers their cut, has to pay the validation company for every transaction on the terminals, has to pay for marketing costs.

  33. No different than video slots by jgoeres · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would refer anyone with questions about this game's alleged (pre)pubescent target audience to the fine, upstanding American cities of Las Vegas, Reno, or Atlantic City for comparison.

    Anyone who has been in a casino in the last 5 years has noticed the proliferation of colorful, fully-animated, cartoon slot machines. Almost nothing (except stuff from IGT) has mechanical reels anymore. The new machines _scream_ out "I'm like a video game! Note my humorous caricatures of rednecks, TV stars, and clowns!"

    Sure, the lottery game probably appeals to a certain juvenile instinct in the players (which is what I'd personally have a bigger problem with), but I doubt that this rises to the level of a conspiracy to bilk money from players who are too young to collect the potential purse from playing. It's just a bit of Vegas seeping into the respectable, honest, dependable investm^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hlottery industry.

    And besides, *$4* for one in 260 kiloChances??? Thanks, but I'll stick to baiting reckless drivers to chase me down and assault me so I can sue them.

    Justin

  34. Well... by iwillrefuse · · Score: 1

    If you going to put a tax on the poor, they might as well be poor children.

  35. Gambling addiction. by Asterax · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a subtle attempt to get kids good and addicted to the lottery at a early age ensuring they're future buyers of the purchasing of physical lottery tickets.

    Or a subtle attempt to draw out all those hackers silly enough to try their hand at the lottery, illegally of course.

    So, will there be any cheat codes for this? :P

  36. wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are these types of stories included here soley for readers to make lame jokes about? Seriously, how is this news for nerds? How does this spark useful debate? Does anyone find this interesting? This sucks our inteliigence away. I feel dumper for even having read it.

  37. Re:Why not? Earn money based on skill by megamouse · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you've misunderstood the theory. From what I gather in the article this isn't skill-based at all. Rather it seems that the game is linked to the lottery tickets you buy -- the game is just another (slower) way to discover if the ticket you hold is a winner or not.

    --
    apple nipple hungry
  38. Already been done by Mo+B.+Dick · · Score: 0

    This was already done in Iowa a few years ago, so this is old news. It was big news when it first came out. But I don't think it lasted very long. It was just a big ploy to get people to put more money into it

  39. Oh Goody! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the new game, Treasure Tower, players may use their computer mouse to lead a cartoon character from ancient Babylonia through "a fantastic and humorous universe" of exotic Middle Eastern passageways, palaces and hidden doors in search of cash prizes

    Anyone else thinks this reeks of "Find the one hidden pixel less then the size of a grain of sand?"

    I am also willing to bet that they don't even have that pixel at all.

  40. Re:Why not? Earn money based on skill by nomadic · · Score: 1

    You know, "Damn, I was so close, next time I'll scratch off the "B" column first. I can effect the outcome of a pre-printed lottery card

    Ah, you mean quantum mechanics...

  41. another promotional tie-in by bobdotorg · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about bundling an X rated video game with a pack of condoms. Name of the game: 'Plan B'.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:another promotional tie-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that many people use condoms while masturbating.

    2. Re:another promotional tie-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what is known as a "posh wank" ..... bet David Beckham's had a few of them, eh?

  42. "game might be targeted at children" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. If they have Barney or someone urging kids to buy lottery tickets ("Gosh, they help our state's senior citizens! You should always help your elders!")..

    Most likely, though, this is yet another simple troll. It's like saying Quake 3 is marketed to children because "It's a game!" (Erm, no.), or Evangelion is marketed to kids because "It's a cartoon!" (Erm, no.)

    It's like the bullshit they pulled with the tobacco industry. C'mon - Joe Camel being targetted at kids?

    You ever look at Joe Camel? He was ugly as shit, and dressed funny. If they were marketting to kids (Thoughts of idiots in marketting departments aside), they would've had a purple dinosaur lighting up every five minutes.

    "Kids love cowboys! Thus, CowboyNeal is marketted to kids! Oh, someone, think of the children!"

  43. Thank you! by spoonist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Connecticut State Lottery,

    I would like to sincerely thank you. For quite some time now, I've wanted to hone my reverse engineering skills to a very fine edge. Lately, though, I have lacked motivation.

    For a while, I dabbled in reverse engineering on-line gambling software. However, depositing money in some shady off-shore bank first really put a wet blanket on my enthusiasm.

    This announcement has rekindled my desire to expand my reverse engineering capabilities. I look forward to practicing on your software.

    Thank you.

    -spoonist

  44. There not the first... by nairnr · · Score: 1

    Been there done that, played the card games... There is no chance of cheating, since the card is verified just like any other lottery card. The key determines how the games plays and shows you what you win (or not win). Even if you don't enter the correct key while playing the game and win the 25k on your computer, you are never going to collect it...

  45. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're supposed to offer $12,500......

  46. Wow... by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny
    "It's got softer music. It's nonviolent. The action figure is a traveler, not a superhero."

    "We don't think that a child would really be interested in playing this game."

    Well, at least they understand modern kids!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Wow... by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      "It's got softer music. It's nonviolent. The action figure is a traveler, not a superhero."
      "We don't think that [anyone] would really be interested in playing this game."

      CT is making their own version of Sims Online?

  47. Cartoons... by petronivs · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "You cannot say it is not related to children when you use cartoon figures. It's obvious children will gamble with this product," Steinberg said. "There should be no cartoon figures in any form of gambling."

    I guess slots are improper, then. Can't have those cartoony-looking fruits. Hey! Fruits! I betcha someone's gonna say slots are gay now...

    --
    This is the real signature
    (Beats those shadows on the cave wall, don't it?)
    1. Re:Cartoons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slots are gay now... can't have those cartoony-looking fruits

  48. Hold your horses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By the description of the game it seems pretty much like the one available here in Quebec. Here the two games are a Mah-Jongg type and a mini-putt type of games. The basic point is that they are not casino-type games, so as such would not encourage per-se children to become money-playing addicts.

    What is more, the games have parental control protection in case you think playing too much golf is dangerous to your 4-year-old.

    I understand that the point is that children are attracted to computer games, put believe me, these are well executed but lame games... And at some point, you have to take responsibility as a parent to control what your child does.

    Finally, the games are certainly easily crackable. The catch is that "winning" the game has no value. As the article points out, its the ticket that has the value, protected by a zillion digits control number. So it is on the same level as other scratch-and-win games.

    1. Re:Hold your horses by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      It says the game is owned by Lotto Quebec, just being distrod by Connecticutt.

      But here's something even stupider:

      <quote>
      "You get four tickets for $15. Where could you buy a video game for 15 bucks? You can't," said Derevensky, co-director of the McGill University Youth Gambling Research and Treatment Clinic in Montreal.
      </quote>

      Methinks he should check out game prices at Future Shit^H^H^HShop - Microsoft Flight Sim 98 = $14.99 Cdn, Railroad Something-or-other $9.99 Cdn, playable demos of various games ("Raven Shield", etc. - 1 cent), Maxis 6-game Sim Packs (SimIsle, other titles) under $20.00. Derevensky should get out more.

  49. Lottery & ATM's by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, states would do well to partner with banks to put the lottery in bank ATM machines. When you go to withdraw cash, you have the option to buy so many lottery tickets, using funds from your account. If you lose, too bad. But if you win, instant payout.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Lottery & ATM's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you win, instant payout.

      Yeah cause ATM machines carry $25,000 in cash.

      You do realize that ATM machines don't actually print money, right?

    2. Re:Lottery & ATM's by sahala · · Score: 1
      Actually, states would do well to partner with banks to put the lottery in bank ATM machines. When you go to withdraw cash, you have the option to buy so many lottery tickets, using funds from your account. If you lose, too bad. But if you win, instant payout.

      I don't know much about the lottery-ticket buying demographic, but I'd bet that the target audience isn't of the ATM-card carrying, bank-account-in-good-standing type. No offense to those of you out there who do actually buy lottery tickets. I just don't think that there would be a significant increase in lottery players if ATMs dispensed tickets/winnings.

    3. Re:Lottery & ATM's by dustinmarc · · Score: 1

      There are ATM's somewhat like this in Connecticut casinos already. You tell the ATM how much you want to take out and right then it asks you if you want to bet double or nothing on a hand of video poker. Not sure where the profit goes though. The casinos in Connecticut are on Native American Reservations so it probably doesn't go to the state.

      --


      Microsoft should hire me. I can write code that doesn't work faster than the guys they have doing it now.
    4. Re:Lottery & ATM's by flink · · Score: 1

      Stores don't pay out $25k either. Over a certain ammount, you have to go to the lottery office to arrange payment. The ATM could print a receipt or send a message to the lottery computers indicating a win.

      It could still pay out cash for smaller winnings, say less than $200.

  50. Seriously... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...if it doesn't run on a Mac or Linux, does that show favoritism by the Gov for a company found guilty of abusing its monopolostic position? I would think the Gov would put out something platform neutral. Javascript, flash, or better yet Java plugin.

    1. Re:Seriously... by Threni · · Score: 1

      "I would think the Gov would put out something platform neutral. Javascript, flash, or better yet Java plugin."

      Yeah, if I was in charge, i`d try to hurt a company which has provided me with millions of dollars in taxes.

    2. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does that show favoritism by the Gov for a company found guilty of abusing its monopolostic position

      No, it shows that the goverment made a wise choice by developing for a platform that 99.99% of their users have.

  51. won't be crackable by bgs4 · · Score: 1

    each winning disk will likely have some unique number identifying it as a winner. The best you could do would be to duplicate someone's winning disk, and then they would just be confused as to who actually won (you could do the same with a winning scratch ticket). I'm sure it won't be crackable-- as if they would have something like:

    if winning_disk:
    allow_winning_door_to_open = true
    else:
    allow_winning_door_to_open = false

  52. Simpson's Reference by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    What is the Simpson's audience? Un supervixed kids, or the older than 18 crowd. With all the political satire, in jokes, and social comentary the Simpson's is hardly a kid show.

    The comparison doesn't hold that some cartoons talk about gambling so it must be ok for all to do so. Think target audience.

    robi

    1. Re:Simpson's Reference by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1

      Given that the much-hyped 300th episode of the Simpsons had Tony Hawk (Pro Skater) as a guest star, I'd say that The Simpsons was aiming for the 12 and up crowd that night. It's also worth noting that The Simpsons is syndicated, and is shown throughout different parts of the nation between 3:00PM and 6:00PM (kids watch it when they get home from school).

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    2. Re:Simpson's Reference by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. I'm a 27 year old skateboarder who grew up watching Tony Hawk in the old Powell Peralta vids (Search for Animal Chin, Future Primitive, etc) along with other skaters my age. How do you work out that his appearance on the Simpsons was to appeal to children? Is it because the first you've heard of him was when the playstation game came out? (Again, a console aimed at the teenage to young adult market) That's a real stretch. The simpsons is also the most heavily televised show IN HISTORY. Just because it's on at 3:00 am in peru does that mean it's only aimed at meth-smoking nocturnal freaks?

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    3. Re:Simpson's Reference by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      With all the political satire, in jokes, and social comentary the Simpson's is hardly a kid show.

      Nevertheless, my five-year-old daughter loves it. And check out all the toys, tee-shirts and other Simpsons merchandise. It's not all bought by sad "comic-book-store guy" types, mostly it's kids.

  53. i've already seen that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://192.197.135.2/produits/prod10.htm

    sorry but the link is in french...

    In Quebec, the loto society is offering a similar product, with a comparable range of prize (well, the prize are in canadian buck, so they worth almost nothing... :-( )

    The concept is that they give you a cd for free (I think that you can also download the program from their site), then you buy a ticket, scratch and enter the number at the begining of the program, and let play the game...

    Whatewer you're doing during this ten minutes of dreaming does'nt mind, and the program tell you that you hav'nt won anything at all...

    so it is impossible to crack as an usual lotery ticket...

  54. crackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm sure there are some bored crackers out there who'd tackle this for a chance at some cash. What do you think?"

    I'm sure other people besides white people would want to try this too.

  55. If theyre smart enough to put it in! by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they have a clause like that, otherwise theyre gonna loose tons of money on this.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  56. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work for a company that produces scratch and win lottery tickets, this is actually old news. Many countries/companies have produced such a game

    The game (of which I haven't played) has nothing to do with skill, it only depends upon the numbers that are under the scratch off material on the physical ticket. so even if you could "crack" the game it wouldn't do anything for you because to clain the prize you need the physical ticket.

    The game is nothing but a formality if you didn't have a PC you could just simply turn the ticket in and the retailer would tell you if you've won/loose and for how much.

  57. Oh sure .... LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if winning_disk:
    allow_winning_door_to_open = true
    else:
    allow_winning_door_to_open = false

    Right?

    Well it doesn't take a FREAKIN' GENIUS to "swap" these....

    If someone is lame enought to code this, then a jnz/jz or jne/je swap will be enough. *smug grin*

    Peace out.. l337phr33

    1. Re:Oh sure .... LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you change this on a CD-ROM how exactly?
      (you need the cd/ticket to claim prize)

  58. Lotteries are a tax on the stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government wipes out the 'numbers' games as illegal, then turns around and comes up with lotto.

    Then they come up with these scratch off games, which can be played and redeemed instantly, the odds are determined and printed in advance so the house NEVER loses. Then they throw in small ($5, $10) wins so people can win, redeem and buy MORE tickets...

    Scratch off and Keno are a hundred times worse than the old numbers rackets, and run by your government. They're a tax on the stupid.

  59. Re:If theyre smart enough to put it in! by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

    It's a state lottery. They don't lose money. No matter what.

    --
    "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  60. Oh sure .... LOL "uncrackable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if winning_disk:
    allow_winning_door_to_open = true
    else:
    allow_winning_door_to_open = false

    Right?

    If someone is lame enought to code this, then a jnz/jz or jne/je swap will be enough. *smug grin*

    Sure looks "uncrackable" to me, L0L...

    Peace out... l337phr33

  61. Stealing Bread by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    Just like it is moral to steal bread to feed a starving family, but not if you put anything on it like jelly.

    robi

  62. Connecticutt lottery program by jamsession · · Score: 1

    By any chance was this program released as open source?

  63. Let's get them hooked on gambling early... by Ben1234 · · Score: 2

    This is attrocious, lotteries are basically gambling. (I know, don't buy it or use it, but it's often not that easy for someone who is addicted) This is like targeting kids with cigarettes, get them hooked young and you have a customers for life. I know some might argue that lotteries contribute to worthy state programs but I think the longterm consequences (yet another addiction) should seriously be considered. If they do produce a game don't target it at kids and make it obvious what it is -- a vehicle to get you to play the lottery more often!

  64. Huh. Has anyone... by ah.clem · · Score: 1

    ... posted the binary and some access codes for d/l? I think a lot of /. folks would like to take a look at it.

    --
    "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
  65. Speaking of gambling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bet you $50,000 that I can crack it.

  66. nothing to hack by redfood · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I'm sure there are some bored crackers out there who'd tackle this for a chance at some cash"

    From the article it sounds like the ticket determins if you win money and the game is just window dressing.

    From the Courant:
    "Customers may choose to forgo the CD and just scratch and turn in their ticket to see if it's a winner"

  67. Reminds me of the Cadillac PowerPlay contest by PseudoThink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They sent out a DVD-ROM game you could play, which was basically a Macromedia choose-your-own-path game with Quicktime movies. Highest three scores would win an Escalade, powerboat, or motorcycle. They tried to make you play it while you were online, the idea being that only your first reported score mattered. That was easy to circumvent though (thank to plaintext registry keys), so you could play as many times as you wanted to find the optimal solution (skill was not a factor, though finding the highest valid score was a tiny bit tricky). Needless to say, my friend and I both got into the final round (along with 100 or so other fellow cheate...I mean, very lucky players), from which the winner was selected by a lame 50 word essay. We tried to "hack" that too by making a funny video presentation and web site, and including the urls in our essays. But we didn't win...some lame limmerick and word play essays were the winners...bastards! But if the lotto game was anything like that, you can bet their first winner will be mere hours after they release the game. It's probably linked to a ticket number, though, like someone else said. That's the easiest way for them to render hacking attempts useless.

  68. Like wargames... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A person with no lottery tickets has already won.

  69. Plenty of games for =$15 by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    "You get four tickets for $15. Where could you buy a video game for 15 bucks? You can't," said Derevensky, co-director of the McGill University Youth Gambling Research and Treatment Clinic in Montreal. "You wouldn't give your 9-year-old a drink of alcohol because you know it is not appropriate. Most parents are totally unaware that gambling is a problem among youth."

    Derevensky may be missing many of the items that make good games (and even crappy new games) cost more than $15. I am betting that this game does not have great graphics, fluid gameplay, engaging story line, or even cool weapons and gor ydeath scenes. What kid is going to want to play it.

    You can go to Walmart and get tons of totally crappy games for $15.
    robi

    1. Re:Plenty of games for =$15 by sqlrob · · Score: 1
      You can go to Walmart and get tons of totally crappy games for $15.

      Or even good ones that are just slightly older (Fallout 1 & 2, Planescape: Torment, Elite Force, Alpha Centauri...)

    2. Re:Plenty of games for =$15 by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      NO! Alpha Centauri isn't old! NOOOOOO!!!

      *sob*

      *sniffle*

      Well, you might be right. Humph.

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    3. Re:Plenty of games for =$15 by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Considering that I just picked it up for less than $5, new, It's old.

  70. Many games already do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    which offer a chance of winning $25,000 by playing

    Is it real money... or do they just show your character with a $25,000 cheque and some text that says "You are the winner!" with some cheesy background music?

  71. We have something like that here in Quebec. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The computer game is only there to tell you if you have a winning ticket and no matter how well or how bad you play the game, you'll get the prize if your ticket is a winning one, skill is not a factor, the computer game is not a factor, the only thing that is a factor is the number on the ticket you buy, and that number can only be seen by scratching the ticket so hacking the game to see what all the winning numbers are is useless.

    It's a dressed up instant lottery.

  72. Yep a chance for crash by antis0c · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and a get into Jail free card!

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  73. Right... by siskbc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's actually not true. People can have rational preferences over wealth levels that imply they should play the lottery, even though the expected return is negative.

    ...wanna look at a statistical distribution of who plays the lottery? Wanna look at what types of TV shows they advertise during, and when they air? Your average lottery player is generally not all that bright, usually quite poor, and frequently un/under-employed. Particularly those people who play it with any regularity (ie, not for the occasional novelty). There's a reason they advertise during those inane judge shows that air during working hours.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Right... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I no longer live in the US, but I always hated the California and Illinois lottery commercials showing someone in a tux stepping out of their stretch limo with a beautiful woman on each arm, all for winning a scratch $10000 lottery prize. I say that, if it weren't the gov't making such a commercial, it would have been pulled as fraudulent immediately.
      I guess that's another tick for "people who suck at math."
      Dan

    2. Re:Right... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Nah, 10 grand is enough for a limo, a tux, and 2 escorts. For one night. Barely. It's at least a little more plausible than the idea that drinking a certain type of beer gets you the limo and the hookers.

    3. Re:Right... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      There's a reason they advertise during those inane judge shows that air during working hours.

      How would you know? :)

  74. What bothers me... by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
    ...is this quote from the article:
    "You cannot say it is not related to children when you use cartoon figures. It's obvious children will gamble with this product," Steinberg said. "There should be no cartoon figures in any form of gambling."
    Since when are children the only people who like cartoon characters? It seems like the assumption is being made that cartoons only appeal to children, and (as many here know) that's inaccurate.
    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    1. Re:What bothers me... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Well, then abridge his comments. 'Cartoons that are not boring, nor featuring tentacle rape' should cover it well enough.

  75. Why stop there? by dwdyer · · Score: 4, Funny
    When you go to withdraw cash, you have the option to buy so many lottery tickets, using funds from your account. If you lose, too bad. But if you win, instant payout.

    Heck, why not have an option to receive your Income Tax refund in lottery tickets?

    Or maybe a certain percentage of your paycheck? Wait -- they call that stock options.

    --
    -dwd-
  76. I can see where this is going by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    *hack hack hack* Hey look, I won! *hack hack hack* Heh! I won AGAIN! Gee, what are the odds ;)

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:I can see where this is going by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing to hack. You have to buy a scratch ticket and enter the # on the ticket. Big deal. Hack all you want. If you want to claim the prize you had better have the paper ticket.

  77. Re:In other news... by Mario+B · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, you need to have a winning ticked to claim any prize. Each ticket you buy will get you a different "code" to play the game (the code determines if you're going to win and what the prize will be).

  78. MOD PARENT UP FUNNY AS HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP FUNNY AS HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking.

      That was about as funny as the "In Soviet Russia, Lottery programs you" jokes.

  79. They ARE smart... by Mario+B · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, you need to have a winning ticket to claim any prize. Each ticket you buy will get you a different "code" to play the game (the code determines if you're going to win and what the prize will be).

  80. Did someone mention Orwell? by release7 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Let's see, what did Orwell have to say about lotteries?

    They were talking about the Lottery. Winston looked back when he had gone thirty metres. They were still arguing, with vivid, passionate faces. The Lottery, with its weekly pay-out of enormous prizes, was the one public event to which the proles paid serious attention. It was probable that there were some millions of proles for whom the Lottery was the principal if not the only reason for remaining alive. It was their delight, their folly, their anodyne, their intellectual stimulant. Where the Lottery was concerned, even people who could barely read and write seemed capable of intricate calculations and staggering feats of memory. There was a whole tribe of men who made a living simply by selling systems, forecasts, and lucky amulets. Winston had nothing to do with the running of the Lottery, which was managed by the Ministry of Plenty, but he was aware (indeed everyone in the party was aware) that the prizes were largely imaginary.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  81. In other news... by I+Love+this+Company! · · Score: 4, Funny
    All you need is a dollar and a dream...

    ...and Window XP
    DirectX 9.0
    64 megs of ram

    The odds of getting Windows XP to run smoothly with 64MB of RAM are now greater than winning the actual lottery.

    --

    "All art is quite useless." -- Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean less than? =)

    2. Re:In other news... by techstar25 · · Score: 1

      =funniest post I've ever read on /. ever.

  82. hacking the $25000 prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I doubt its possible.

    Most likely winning the video game alone does not automatically land 25k. I would assume that if/when you win the video game, it will give you some way to enter into a lottery draw.

    Win a chance to win 25k

    yay

  83. Lottery subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    States should offer a lottery subscription: You sign up for one or more numbers to play every week, and the state deducts the ticket price from each paycheck. If your number comes up, you win. No more slips of paper! And lots of revenue for the state. It'd be like signing up for extra taxes.

  84. OMG, a game for $15!!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get four tickets for $15. Where could you buy a video game for 15 bucks? You can't...

    Uhh, last time I checked, if you already have a computer TO RUN THE GAME, there are alot of games that cost less than $15.

    Go back to watching little kiddies play inside your office - you might learn something.

  85. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    These have been around for some time. Lotto Quebec has been offering a PC video game lottery for about a year, and I believe the province of Ontario is now as well.

    I don't think they offer much fodder for crackers. The worst you can do is bypass the silly video game thing to get your name in a standard drawing.

  86. This is /., so someone has to say it.. by sconeu · · Score: 1

    What taxes?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:This is /., so someone has to say it.. by intermodal · · Score: 1

      well, there are two possible replies, so i will give both without taking a side since it can work both ways for his arguement:

      Microsoft pays no federal income tax due to a clever ruse they have gotten to be legal.

      Retailers pay a considerable amount of sales tax on said products when purchased retail, though the OEM version's sales tax associated with it is almost certainly negligible when you compare it to the rest of the hardware, esp. when the OEMs rather than the sofware company are the ones paying the sales tax.

      IANAL or accountant, and I do not know the sales tax laws in said state.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  87. tearin' thru tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after the first week the winning numbers will be known and people will be killing each other, stealing lottery tickets, etc..to find the winning numbers!

  88. The difference between lottery and gambling by yo303 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I have never understood the difference between so-called "illegal" gambling and legal gambling such as the lottery and church-run bingo games.

    It's not just the level of skill involved. Let's have a look.

    • One-armed bandits - gambling, no skill required
    • Horse betting - gambling, some skill required
    • Poker - gambling, skill required

    • Government lotteries - not gambling, no skill required
    • Bingo - not gambling, some skill required
    • Playing the stock market - not gambling, skill required

    What exactly is the difference? As was mentioned elsewhere, Reverend Lovejoy said it best:

    Once something has been approved by the Government, it's no longer immoral.

    yo.

    1. Re:The difference between lottery and gambling by BTWR · · Score: 1

      I haven't played Bingo since camp (M&M's bingo - where we'd all lose cuz we ate all of our chips) - but I'm seriously curious, how exactly does Bingo have any skill?

    2. Re:The difference between lottery and gambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You answered your own question: the skill in bingo is marker management (whether the markers are M&M's or an ink blotter).

      Hey, he didn't say it required a lot of skill.

    3. Re:The difference between lottery and gambling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This difference is governments and churches reserve this lucrative business for themselves and want to lock out competition.

      The government simply makes laws to prohibit competition.

      The church, lacking the enforcement powers of the government, uses more devious techniques to convince sufficient numbers of people that it is bad, unless church sponsered.

  89. Iowa was the first in 11/2000 by hether · · Score: 1

    Iowa was the first to offer this Treasue Tower game. The story on this page from 11/16/00:

    Lottery's Treasure Tower Sales Going Well

    Iowa is the first state in the nation to offer an instant-ticket lottery game that can be played on a home computer. Sales of the game began in October, and have gradually been introduced to all of the game at select shopping malls. As of November 14th, the Iowa Lottery has collected approximately $187,456 in sales from the game.
    Treasure Tower is a unique combination of a scratch game and CD-ROM technology, with the security of built-in parental control. The Treasure Tower CD cannot be activated without a code from a scratch ticket, which must be purchased at an Iowa retailer by someone age 21 or older.
    Players initially buy a Treasure Tower pack containing a CD and three scratch tickets for $12. After the game is installed, future tickets can be bought for $4 per ticket.
    Recommended minimum computer re-quirements for the game:
    Pentium® 166 MHz compatible
    Windows® 95, Windows® 98 or Windows® 2000
    32 MB main memory
    20 MB available on hard disk
    CD-ROM player 8X
    Sound card (compatible with DirectSound®)
    SVGA Graphics card (640 x 480 pixels in 16-bit mode)
    The game will not operate on Windows NT, Mac or Linux systems. Players experiencing difficulty playing the game can call 1-888-852-5558 for assistance from 8 a.m. to midnight.
    The game will automatically install itself when inserted into the computer. Treasure Tower then asks for an access code, which is found on scratch tickets in the game. Each ticket contains a single access code good for one adventure. Once installed, the game can be played again and again with different tickets granting access to different adventures.

    Expansion of Gambling?
    Critics contend that Treasure Tower is an ex-pansion of gambling, and is a form of video gam-bling at home. They are also concerned that the game, with cartoon characters, targets kids. The Iowa Lottery is emphasizing the parental control features of the game that allow adults to block access to the game by those under the age of 21. By entering their own password in the game, players can block anyone else from playing the game.
    Set in the Babylonian era, Treasure Tower takes players with a character known as "the Traveler" as he explores the Treasure Tower, a desert castle. The tower has 100 rooms and the code on each ticket gives the player 10 lucky stones that grant access to at least 10 of the rooms. As the traveler searches the tower, the player helps him find objects and symbols in each room. Finding three identical symbols wins a prize. Prizes start at $4, and reaching room 100 at the top of the tower wins the top prize of $10,000.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:Iowa was the first in 11/2000 by hether · · Score: 1

      BTW, on that same page

      Lottery Goes Scratch and Sniff
      Much less controversial is the Lottery's other scratch game called Easy as Pie. This game features the first scented lottery tickets introduced in Iowa.
      Tiny capsules of the pumpkin pie scent were applied to the edges of the latex area on the front of Easy as Pie tickets. The scent of cinnamon and pumpkin pie will be released when players scratch their tickets. :-)

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    2. Re:Iowa was the first in 11/2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I found this at Government Computer News.

      IOWA

      DISPUTED BET. The Iowa Lottery Board has come under fire for rolling out the first scratch lottery game on CD-ROM. The Treasure Tower game requires users to buy scratch tickets, then play a CD-ROM interactive game that lasts 15 to 20 minutes.

      The Truth about Gambling Foundation, a Burlington anti-gambling group, has condemned the Treasure Tower game and called for it to be regulated by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission because of its similarities to slot machine gambling.

      Ingenio Filiale de Lotto-Quebec of Montreal developed Treasure Tower. To run it, users need at least a 166-MHz Pentium, Microsoft Windows 95 and an 8X CD-ROM drive.

  90. $$$$$exyGal == Ekrout (a guy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    $$$$$exyGal is a fan whoring guy...want proof? Check out these links

    $$$$$exyGal's obsession with fans (scroll down to the end of the porn links):
    http://slashdot.org/~$$$$$exyGal/journal

    Ekrout's obsession with fans:
    http://slashdot.org/~ekrout/journal

    Notice that Eric Krout compares his # of fans to the same type of people in both cases!

    1. Re:$$$$$exyGal == Ekrout (a guy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a username like '$$$$$exyGal' and the protest in the .sig that 'I'm a girl'... it took you this long to figure it out?!

      It set my 'doth protest too much' sensors off first time I saw it.

  91. The CD's a gimmick by krisbrockway · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The store I work at got in one of the demos for this game, and since I'm the "resident computer geek", they had me test it out. The CD part of the game is just a complete gimmick. You buy a ticket, which has some long number you type into the program. You watch it go through some corny animation sequences, where you click on every damn thing on the screen, then afterwards, it shows if you won anything. The CD itself doesn't do anything, you need the $4 ticket to claim the prize.

    Personally, I think it's going to flop. A lot of the people that I see who buy lotto tickets either go immediately scratch them, then return five minutes later to cash them and buy more, or they just purchase occasionally. This won't appeal to either group; the occasional buyer won't want to drop $25 for the "starter kit" with CD, and the addicts want their money right away, and won't buy it.

    1. Re:The CD's a gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok maybe but can I choose the number when I buy the ticket?
      If i live outside of USA how can I get the CD and order the number of my choice?

    2. Re:The CD's a gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's to stop you from bringing your laptop to work, typing in all the numbers to the unbought tickets, then buying only the winners?

    3. Re:The CD's a gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'll end up on tlc/discovery's next caught on camera show

  92. This is Baaadddd! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    How many kids will get a hold of this on their own. I mean, my 4 year old understands windows enough to run the autorun-setup program!

    parental keys only work after it's installed. I just don't like the idea of kids randomly getting ahold of this.

    My wife is horrible about gambling! I have a stuffed dog from the fair that cost $50! We just kept on playin' until she won something and in the end we ended up owing the guy like $30 cause we weren't payin' before each shot. Since then, I don't let her out of my sight at the fair, or at least hand her a budget and cut her off! the dog serves as a visual reminder! If she ever walked in a casino, I'd be bankrupt!

    They say people should stop themselves, but I'll tell you that certian personalities just can't stop hoping for the big score! Putting this in any form where kids can get it unattended is just wrong and should be stopped! The people planning this should be booted from office or fired, whichever applies! If your Legislative critters get ideas like this--boot 'um!

    1. Re:This is Baaadddd! by JCash$ · · Score: 1

      Not trying to flame here, but you apparently do not understand the concept here. The game is merely an interface to input numbers obtained from a purchased lottery ticket. Unless parents are going to be buying tickets for the children to use in the game, I do not see a problem.

      --
      -Poo will never be unfunny.
  93. Look shit up once in a while. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    You may find your misconceptions destroyed!

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    1. Re:Look shit up once in a while. by unicron · · Score: 1

      I did. It's EXACTLY how he mentioned it. That book is great. He even confirmed my original theory that most rednecks spend an amount of money on a Nascar ticket equivalent to half a years rent.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  94. It happens once in a while. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    THey had 911 come up in a pick 3 a few days after it happened, and one time a planes flight number came up. ALthough over the course of the year they come out way the hell ahead.

    ANd how morbid do you have to be to play the numbers of a downed plane.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  95. Re:fp beeyatch!... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOT... XDDDDD

  96. And that's ok. by raehl · · Score: 1

    1) The state lottery is not going to send out its goons to kill you if you get too far in the hole.

    2) It's better for the stupid to be paying their stupid tax to a fund for roads/education/etc so that my taxes are lower than for them to be paying their stupid tax to the mob. That doesn't help keep my taxes down.

    Although I don't necessarily agree with the assessment that the lottery is merely a tax on the stupid. The lottery is entertainment. Spending $36 on lottery tickets isn't any worse than spending $36 on Quake CDXVII. In fact, wasting your $36 on the lottery may even be preferable, as at least you still have the hours of time you saved by NOT playing Quake left to do something constructive.

    If people want to spend $5 for a day or even a few minutes of wondering if they've won, what makes them any worse than someone who spends $40/month and wastes hours on end playing Everquest? The consumer is entertained for some amount of time, and when that time is over, they're left with nothing of value.

    Gambling is only "bad" because it's entertainment where the people who REALLY like it can very easily entertain themselves into bankruptcy and other bad things - the ratio of dollars consumed to time required to consume it is high. Hell, I bet I know more people who are broke because they play paintball too much than who are broke because they gamble too much. *ANY* form of expensive entertainment will mess up your life if you do it too much.

  97. This will only end badly. by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

    And in other news, a local hacker was arrested today for hacking into a pigly-wiggly lotto machine. Other local hackers in hysterics.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  98. Lottery Cracking by Apreche · · Score: 1

    Wow, I live in CT, this could be sweet. I've been thinking about hacking the lottery for awhile. I mean ever look at those lottery machines that convenience stores have? They are pretty much big dial up network appliances. They connect to the lottery database and keep track of everything. That's how they know which store sold which winning ticket at what time. It is a computer network, and is therefore not 100% secure. If there was some way to root it you could counterfeit a ticket. Then trick the lottery database into thinking that that ticket was actually sold at a particular store at a particular time and date. And if you go to the store and actually buy a ticket, and just change the numbers in the database, the security camera in the store will verify the validity. Now they've got a game where you can win 25 gs online! I gotta find a way to win, just once.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  99. The perfect drug by opticfiber · · Score: 1

    The adding convience for gambling addicted lemings is applaudable. But why stop thier? Why not create an entire online lottery site, call it casino.ct.us .

  100. odds by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    my understanding that teh 1 in 26,000 or whatever it ism is just the odds of winning any prize like say your doller back.

  101. My kids are already gambling online. by Kent+Brewster · · Score: 1
    Have you ever taken a look at something called NeoPets? It's chock-full of cute little wheel-o-fortune applets. And each of your cute little no-that's-not-really-a-Pokemon critters only gets to play them once or twice a day, so it's guaranteed appointment TV for the little addicts.

    "Dad! Nooo! I can't go to bed yet! Blinkyboo423 didn't get to shake the Money Tree yet!"

  102. Re:Why not? Earn money based on skill by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    Yeah, a cash reward in Diablo. I can imagine how that'd be:

    The same group of 10-20 people would get the prize. Why? Because it'd be the ones with plenty free time to play, who are addicted and have no social life. There'd be some competition between them of course. If you limited it to one win per person all that would result is the same person getting another account to get yet another price. And the average player would have about the same chances of winning something as of getting struck by lightning.

  103. Not enough by wembley · · Score: 1

    What do I think? 25,000 isn't really enough to upgrade my town so that I can produce a third champion. The Night Elves are so gonna kick my butt...

    --

    Share and Enjoy!

  104. Smart crooks have better things to do. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    I believe that involving children in lotteries is a bad idea. It gets children thinking that gambling is a good idea, which is very wrong. It's like those companies that offer credit cards to young students--under 18, I believe--with a parent's co-signature. Most of these kids are not even qualified to be responsible for a credit card... All this does is place them in debt from a younger age.

    As far as hacking the program is involved... sure, someone will waste their time with this. But there are really smart criminals out there who can do the same amount of work and steal millions upon millions of dollars... Why risk about the same length of time in prison for "just" $25,000.00?!?!?! It's like jackasses who rob banks, or even worse, convenience stores... What do they get? $200? And for this, they'll end up in jail for 20 years for armed robbery... Why fsck around with this shit when they can push a few buttons on a computer and jack 8 billion bucks like that hot actress did in that movie with Sean Connery a few years ago? Man, she is so hot! I have a feeling she really likes me. I mean, fuck, the justice system is all fscked up... You put the F-word on someone's website and go to prison for 100 years... but you build nucular weapons and all you get is a piece of paper from the U.N. politely asking you to throw it in the garbage, and if you don't, well, then they'll talk about it on the news until they get blue in the face and in the meantime, you're continuing to prepare yourself for a world-class war of biblical proportions. Why not do shit the smart way? The flippin government should say, "We're gonna blast you to the stone age, and then we're gonna send you a bill to cover our expenses in doing so." But I digress... I don't think that ain't nobody gonna mess with this program to jack 25000 bucks... Cuz the state of conneticut is a lot smarter than that... They'll use unbreakable rot-13 encryption.

  105. To the "you'll never wins" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I always thought. Bought a ticket on odd occasions. Then, a month ago....
    *****WINNER*****

    it changed my life. my advice? have a flutter every now and then.

  106. How it works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did some research, here's how it works:

    You get a CD-ROM with 4 scratch-off tickets. You can throw the CD-ROM away and scratch off the tickets and win your prizes. If you want, you can install the software on the CD-ROM and enter in a code on the back of the ticket. You play the game, and eventually it'll tell you if your ticket won.

    I'm going to reverse-engineer the winning number verification routine and write a winning number generator, then print my own tickets and make thousands of dollars. I can't wait, it's going to rule.

  107. This game is already in widespread circulation.... by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

    Game Info

    I think it's a good idea that its now being bundled with lottery tickets. If you're playing the lottery, you'll undoubtedly find this game both entertaining and highly educational.

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
  108. Not really new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lottery computer games have existed for some time now.
    At least here in Canada.
    Actually, the Connecticut game in question was already deployed around here for quite some time. And it is not the only one...

    http://www.ingenio.ca/ang-content-realisation.ht ml

  109. Misinterpretation by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    My reply was intended to anthony dipierro... Sorry...

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  110. Net messages are hack proof! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    struct Client2ServerInternetLottoMessage {
    short numBytes;
    bool wonTheLotto;
    double numDollarsWon;
    bool hasToPayTaxes;
    char [] internationalBankAccountIDToTransferCashTo;
    };

    Nah, no problems here.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  111. Beat the system by Low+Key · · Score: 1

    If this game is based on the serial number of a lottery ticket, and the game can figure out if the number is a winner, then all that needs to be done is figure out the algorithm to figure the dollar amount a number is worth. (Since the game can do it without an internet connection then it must be predetermined)

    At that point you would have to go around and buy a ticket here and a ticket there until you find one that has a serial number near one of the winners you have discovered.

    Then just buy enough tickets so that you get your winning serial number.

    Boom! Instant $25,000.00

    1. Re:Beat the system by NoDoZ · · Score: 1

      the game's not based on a serial number, but number under the scratch-off part. there's no way of knowing that # unless you've already bought the ticket.

  112. Iowa has been doing this for quite awhile by NoDoZ · · Score: 1

    I remember a couple years ago, you but two tickets at $4 each, and it comes with the CD. after you enter then numbers, it goes through a certain sequence in the game to get to your prize. It always ends the same way with the same ticket. You redeem the ticket just like any other scratch off game.

    I still have the CD here, because I wanted to crack it to see what kind of purty animation it shows if you are the grand prize winner, but I'm too lazy and haven't got to it.

    If you want an ISO of the CD to crack, just say so, I'd be glad to send it to you, I'd love to see it cracked.

  113. We have those CD lotteries in Quebec by M1000 · · Score: 1

    Seems to be exacly the same thing. But the thing is that the code you buy is already winning or not. The game has *nothing* to do with the fact of winning or loosing. Personnaly I'm against it; Some people will think that they can "beat" the game, or that they have to get a better score... But no. Here a link to those games:

    1. Re:We have those CD lotteries in Quebec by M1000 · · Score: 1

      Sorry here is the link:

      http://192.197.135.2/produits/prod10a.htm

  114. Cracking *is* possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could, however, compose a list of winning numbers.

  115. Been there done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As stated in other posts, loto-quebec has been doing this for years. Heres more info

    http://www.loto-quebec.com/web/html/60112_06_e.s ht ml
    Says here that the first one was launched in february of 2000! Over 3 years ago.

    http://192.197.135.2/produits/prod10a.htm
    They currently have 3 different CD ROM games...

    However, more games have been distributed in the past but were taken out after a while.

    So this isnt exactly news!

  116. Quebec Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ingenio , a subsidiary of Loto Quebec makes the software for Quebec and has exported it to at least the Iowa State Lottery and the Belgian National Lottery. Conneticut will be buying the same program. http://www.ingenio-quebec.com/ang-content-realisat ion.html

  117. I did tech support for this in 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When this thing first came out in Quebec, in 2000, I was part of the team who did phone support for this thing.

    Those of you concerned with needing a bomb of a machine need not worry, as it's only a sprite based game that ran just fine on 3 year old hardware.

    As for having kids play, or that being an issue, I don't remember that being a problem either. They did tell us to report any kids or stuff like that, but frankly, this was too dull for kids to get interested in.

    The people who did get interested though (especially around the first of the month), were the same people who live big for that first week of the month (beer and casino), and have to eat kd and grilled cheese sandwiches the rest of the month. For the most part, these were not nobel price recipients.

    You try to get some illiterate to understand that his video card is in fact not a "Circus Logistic", but a Cirrus Logic, and that he needs to gout and download drivers for it....

    At least it payed...

  118. Cartoon gambling by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    In the FA: Steinberg said. "There should be no cartoon figures in any form of gambling."

    Here in Hong Kong the game parlour machines are roughly 50% street-fighter style,and 50% Mahjong or card games. All use cartoons. Many of the games have a femal opponent who disrobes as you progress... I'm pretty sure some parlours pay off in cash, though it's illegal.

  119. It's worse for the winners - Washington Post by MickLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Way back (probably Oct 10, 1993), there was a Washington Post article that followed up on the winners of Maryland's first million-dollar lottery. Almost all of them said winning was the worst thing that ever happened to them.

    I got the date from this website.

    But here's also a quote from the website that gives the typical scenario:

    ------

    "Paul McNabb was Maryland's first $1-million lottery winner 20 years ago. He has now seen his last check, the final $50,000 on his two-decade splurge. He now faces life after lottery. Has the money changed him for better or worse? The story is told by the Washington Post.21
    "Today McNabb lives in a rented two-bedroom apartment near Lake Mead outside Las Vegas, where he drives taxi on the night shift. He doesn't own a car or any property. The lottery experience has ruined his ability to trust his fellow humanity.
    "For a year after his award, his story appeared in dozens of papers, on radio and television, including those in Canada, Britain, and Australia. He received thousands of letters from people wanting money. Religious groups, travel agents, investment counselors, budding film producers, literary groups, poor people all wanted a part of McNabb's good fortune.
    "One letter-writer threatened McNabb's two daughters, whose pictures had appeared in newspapers and on television, unless money was forthcoming. He turned the letters over to the FBI. He feared for himself, his daughters, his wife. His house in the Owings Mills area, near Baltimore, was broken into three times, presumably by people who thought $1 million might be lying around, he said. People came to the door, called on the phone, accosted him everywhere. Rather than to continue enjoying this limelight, he ran for cover, to the shores of Lake Mead, where he joined the military.
    "'If you had gone through what I went through that first year, you wouldn't have trusted your own mother,' he said. 'Do you realize I've lost 20 years of social life, of being human? I never got over the point that I always had to be on my guard.'
    "Stories like this, with variations, can be told about many instant millionaires. Many of gambling's big winners have had their lives turned topsy-turvy. They bear the scars for life.

    ------

    The real losers are the winners. But also losing are the losers. And the people who are taking something [state services] for nothing [lottery-style theft], since they are undermining their own society.

    In line with fasting, people just might try giving up their little personal evils, and maybe we could all live with a little less government, a little less war, ... I dunno.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:It's worse for the winners - Washington Post by everflow · · Score: 1

      In line with fasting, people just might try giving up their little personal evils, and maybe we could all live with a little less government, a little less war, ... I dunno.

      i like this one ... sounds great

      --

  120. we've had them for awhile in calgary, canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    We have a solitare cdrom game - you put in the cdrom, get a ticket, scratch to reveal your number and enter it into the game. It lets you play the soliatre game and If you can finish the game, you win. Now - here's the catch. You still have to take the ticket in to 7-11 to get it "validated" so really - all the outcomes are predetermined. There's no cracking to be done as you could just buy the ticket, scratch it.. and have the clerk validate it for you.

  121. Re:Lottery: def--Insurance is the same game though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same math that shows lotteries to be bad economics also shows that insurance is bad economics. Yes, the insurance companies have to collect more money than they pay out. Hence, assuming the actuaries do their jobs right, the insured (on average) would be better-off investing their premiums.

    For the record, I don't gamble but I do carry insurance. Obviously, this is an emotional choice rather than a strictly "rational" one. The moderate cost of insurance allows me to not worry about catastrophic (although rare) events. For some people, the minor cost of a weekly lottery ticket allows them to dream of really wonderful events (even though it is a very remote possibility).

  122. Something missing... by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    One thing I would be very worried about is the potential of government sponsored software to abuse my box. I can think up a number of nasty scenerios. I can already hear the tech support call: "I installed your lottery software on my machine and none of my applications run anymore, I keep getting these advertisements for the lottery when I try to access my system folder, and worst of all the uninstall program won't even run at all." Then the single tech support person says: "Oh that is no problem, just format your hard drive and call Microsoft for support after that"

    1. Re:Something missing... by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1

      This is just DUMB. You worry about this for GOVERNMENT software? Government software???
      WHAT? So you are afraid of software that obviously has to confrom to certain standards and must not be crap because its being paid for by the taxpayer and will be heavily screened by the media.

      I can think of ZERO "nasty scenarios" in which a representative would put his CAREER on the line by having us pay for intentionally malignant software, like so brilliantly expounded.

      moron.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    2. Re:Something missing... by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      I was not talking about intentionally malignant software. I was referring to buggy code bought from the lowest bidder.

      I am not at all worried about government software, after all they are big users of Windows. How secure can you get?

      "I can think of ZERO..." Sums your flame up nicely.

  123. Cybero by fabsah · · Score: 1

    We had the same game in Belgium about 2 years ago. It was called Cybero. It lasted a few month but people didn't liked it. It was a mess for the National Lottery. I've heard this kind of game is pretty well implemented in Canada. Well, that's what the belgian lottery told us ...

  124. Re:No it does not by CyberDruid · · Score: 1

    When you add something as simple as the standard logarithmic utility function (which basically means that if you have $1.000.000, your utility/happiness/survival will go down more from losing $1.000.000, than it will go up from gaining another $1.000.000), a rational agent becomes risk averse and can thus theoretically benefit from insurance. Lotteries become even more of a sucker deal when you involve the utility function.

    BTW, IANAE.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  125. Return of the 2-D sidescroller! by Argon+Sloth · · Score: 1
    While reading his section, something reminded me of pitfall
    Treasure Tower won't hold much appeal for game-savvy children because it is "leisurely. It's got softer music. It's nonviolent. The action figure is a traveler, not a superhero."
    If I am not mistaken, Pitfall didn't have much music, was mostly nonviolent, and the figure was a traveler, not a superhero. Sure pitfall may have had those alligators that may eat your man, and your character occassionally gets run over by logs, but that's not violence. The alligators do not eat the player in an act of aggression, they eat you because they are lazy bastards who can't be bothered to go to the kitchen for a snack. On a similar note, the logs are mostly inanimate objects, sure they move but not by choice. The do cause your charcter pain, but their no more violent than stubbing your toe on a door frame. Am I the only one to make this connection? I know I wasted many many hours playing pitfall as a child. Also, I don't believe that the people behind this scheme have children or access to computers as children.
    "We don't think that a child would really be interested in playing this game. If the parents are responsible and implement the controls, we feel this is a very safe game,"
    To a child who believes that computers only exist for the purpose of playing games, the concept of any game on a computer is exciting at first. Who reading this has never, ever, scanned a computer at a library, store, school, or any any other public place for any games beyond those installed with windows by default? What makes the geeks of today so different as to not want to 'play' with 'game' they can get their hands on.
    --
    Laziness is a virtue, anyone who bothers to tell you otherwise, is clearly lacking it.
  126. How to wean the elderly from Socialist Insecurity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just cut 'em right the fuck off; let the worthless old looters freeze in the dark!

  127. YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAND.

    Try reading the morons histrory some time.

  128. Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iowa is not exactly the first since treasure tower (and most of these CD based lottery games) was made by Ingenio, on of Loto-Quebec subsidiaries.

  129. This is made by loto Quebec by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1

    This game was used in loto quebec lotteries.
    Heres how it works.
    You buy a scratch ticket.. if you dont have the cd, it will be more expensive.
    You install the game and load it up.. ooh pre rendered 3d.
    You scratch your ticket, there is a code.. Enter the code into the game and you will play a predetermined game where what you win depends on the code you enter. If you win, you take the ticket and bring it to a lotto terminal and claim your prize.
    As you can see, there is zero possibility for cracking.
    Loto Quebec has other games to, check it out!
    http://192.197.135.2/produits/prod10a.htm

  130. I'm in grad school... by siskbc · · Score: 1

    ...that's the very definition of underemployed. ;)

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:I'm in grad school... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. :) They need to work you harder though. Judge Judy should not be one of your courses...

  131. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    American business long ago gave up on demanding that prospective employees
    be honest and hardworking. It has even stopped hoping for employees who are
    educated enough that they can tell the difference between the men's room and
    the women's room without having little pictures on the doors.
    -- Dave Barry, "Urine Trouble, Mister"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...