Slashdot Mirror


Sonicblue files for Chap 11

An anonymous reader writes "ReplayTV and Rio maker Sonicblue is a goner, filing for bankruptcy and selling their assets to D&M, the Japanese parent company of Denon and Marantz. No word what will happen to all those Replay users out there -- that $140 deal on Amazon isn't looking so hot now, is it?"

304 comments

  1. Poor Sonic :-( by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I loved the way the hard-drive based Sonic players connected to your PC without the need for special drivers. Your PC just saw the Sonic device as another hard drive.

    That said, I could not buy one of their players because they would not support WMA files. Over 5gb of my collection is in that format.

    I was forced to go the Creative Labs route with their Nomad Jukebox 3 (Which I got with a 40gb hard drive,,,,,, smooooooooooooth).

    1. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      I was forced to go the Creative Labs route with their Nomad Jukebox 3 (Which I got with a 40gb hard drive,,,,,, smooooooooooooth).

      Yeah, they're nice and all, but they are just too big to fit into my pocket, presonally I prefer the Zen route or the iPod way.

    2. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'll never get the fascination with the iPod. It's twice as much for half the storage as my NJB3.

    3. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How can a first post be redundant?

      Offtopic, troll, flamebait, overrated... maybe, but how can it possibly be redundant?

      Whats up with that?

      Mayhaps moderators are retarded?

    4. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. version of style I feel, goes well with their foil hats.

    5. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My iPod is one *fifth* the size of your NJB3, and is 37% lighter with battery than your NJB without battery.

    6. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      awwwwwww you poor WinWanker (c) (tm)

    7. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO!!!

    8. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by x_man · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I'm sad to see the only other real competitor to Tivo go under, my personal experience with SonicBlue was abysmal:

      I bought the Rio 600 when it first came out and it's a piece of junk. On the hardware side, the device stopped working after about a week and I had to return it. Also, the batteries constantly discharge even if you don't have the device turned on so after a week of sitting in my workout bag, I still have to recharge the darn thing. The little cassette adapter they sell that you plug into your car stereo has also quit working. On the software side, you're forced to use this horrible, non-intuitive download app to load MP3 files. Luckily, I found the Linux variant and I use that now.

      After a few months, I realized 32 MB was nowhere near what I needed so I broke down and ordered the PROPRIETARY memory expansion module - no CompactFlash memory slots here. SonicBlue's online web site ordering mechanism failed to inform me that they were out of stock when I placed my order. Two weeks later I decide to call and only then did they tell me that the device was out of stock. So I canceled my order, or so I thought. I found another web site and ordered the expansion and forgot about SonicBlue for awhile, that is, until four months later when I received a memory expansion box from SonicBlue and my credit card was debited $80 or so.

      So I call up Sonic again - believe me you don't want to sit on hold with this company - and finally got the charge reversed and returned the item. And thankfully, that has been the last dealing I've had with SonicBlue.

      If Sonic's Replay service was anything like their web ordering and MP3 player divisions, I think it's safe to assume that this company needed to go.

      On the lessons learned side of things, always research your tech and open standards can mean the difference between paying $40 for an generic add-on and $80 for the proprietary version.

      X

    9. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What insightful and concise reasoning! You certainly changed my opinion and the opinion of others.

      A score of "-1" and "flamebait" was truly deserved sir.

    10. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by DorianGre · · Score: 1

      I have a PNP 300, the very first RIO, and it is still going strong. Yes, it is cheap plastic, but works great for my daily run. 32 MB was too little, but $19 for a generic SmartMedia card doubled my memory and I now have an hours worth of workout tunes. They never had a proprietary anything, but rather purchased their components from everyone else and put it all together. Nothing proprietary here. Not like the Sony memory stick, for instance, just good ole SmartMedia.

    11. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      That said, I could not buy one of their players because they would not support WMA files. Over 5gb of my collection is in that format.

      Their CD-based players (the Rio Volt series) support WMA...not that I've ever needed that capability, as I've always ripped to MP3, but the capability is there.

      (On my last long drive, though, I left the SP90 and home and ran AeroPlayer on a Palm Tungsten T. 256 megs is enough for 4-5 hours, and it supports both MP3 and Ogg Vorbis. I brought along a CD with more music to load onto the card (through a notebook and a card reader) for the return trip. The SP90 skips on rough roads, but the Palm doesn't.)

      BTW, dBpowerAMP lets you convert from WMA to more open formats. (You could also build the WAVDest DirectShow filter (part of the DirectX SDK) and use it in GraphEdit to convert WMA to WAV, but that's a cumbersome approach that requires Visual C++ to implement because the WAVDest filter is only supplied as source.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It fits in your pants pocket, the Nomad Jukebox does not... unless you have some bigass pants.

    13. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by MrTangent · · Score: 1

      "I could not buy one of their players because they would not support WMA files. Over 5gb of my collection is in that format."

      Ouch. I can't believe anyone uses the WMA format. It's practically impossible -- at least in my experience -- to transfer it, edit it, or render it into another format. Why wouldn't you use mpg (mpeg-4) or mov files?

    14. Re:Poor Sonic :-( by MrTangent · · Score: 1

      Oops, I was thinking of Microsoft's proprietary video format. But the topic remains, why in the hell did you use WMA? Mp3 or Ogg Vorbis is clearly the best way. If it doesn't have DRM built-in already, WMA most assuredly WILL have DRM built-in at some point. That might make your precious audio hard to transfer to a portable at a later date, without some sort of annoying authorization process (or worse, you might have to PAY to encode and transfer the cd's you ALREADY OWN to a portable device -- don't trust proprietary Microsoft technologies... EVER. Especially in light of their upcoming DRM methods).

  2. good...no more spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In one way I'm sort of glad. I never was successful in getting them to stop sending me spam even after repeated calls to their main office.

  3. I guess they had to sell the dept. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "from the dept."

    Pretty sad. Can't even afford their dept. here on Slashdot.

    1. Re:I guess they had to sell the dept. too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was from the missing in action dept.

    2. Re:I guess they had to sell the dept. too by jmoriarty · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is a NULL in there that you missed. "from the (NULL) dept." implies that SonicBlue has turned into nothing, and that if anyone tries to dereference their assets it will blue-screen the parent company's accounting. See? It is a coding reference and a Microsoft dig all in one!

  4. Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by fetta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hopefully Tivo won't go the same route. Fortunately, if it did, the active Tivo hackers community would probably provide some solutions for replacing the discontinued service portion of the Tivo product.

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
    1. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      /.ers have got me seriously thinking about getting a Tivo. Everyone seems to like it so much.

    2. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      With the increasing power and flexibility of PVR cards for the PC, how long until TiVo et al become -1 redundant, because nerds can roll their own, and "dudes" can order it as an option when "they're gettin a Dell"?

      All the do-it-for-me type features can surely be replicated in open source, and automatic listings and whatnot can be had via the 'net.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by zsmooth · · Score: 1

      Stop thinking about it and get one. Seriously.

    4. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All the do-it-for-me type features can surely be replicated in open source

      People have been saying that for years, and so far, nothing. There's something to be said for doing one thing, and doing it well, and that's what the TiVo does. Add to that the fact most people prefer to watch TV on TV, and that's why TiVo is better.

      I say this as an owner of an All-In-Wonder which tries (keyword: tries) to replicate some of the TiVo features. Some things work, some things sorta work, and some things don't work at all. And this is with a relatively powerful computer. The only real advantage the computer has it the ability to transfer media, and if MPAA, etc ever let them without a fight, I'm sure TiVo will work to add this.

    5. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine nothing on TV worth recording.

      I cant think of a TV show that I'd be upset if I missed.

      I've never used the record feature on a VCR in my life. I dont see why I'd need to upgrade it to something digital.

      But that's just me.

    6. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's going to take a while; because of the massive investment in "infrastructure" set up for TiVo with regard to its database of programming information, from which the guide gets its data and from which season passes, wish lists, thumbs up/down and autonomous recordings flow.

      The roll-your-own crowd seems to think a free replacement for TiVo is as simple as putting together some inexpensive hardware and throwing one's luck to the wind in hopes that guide data can be pulled from the net. However, after using one for a few months now, I can say that the value added by the TiVo service is not something that can be inexpensively provided by goodwill alone.

    7. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Couple this with a good card that does TV out, and you've got a go. I have one, it works great.

      The hardware for a roll-your-own is still too pricey to make it worthwhile, as this card costs as much as a tivo, but that will no doubt change.

      There's no reason you can configure a PC to do one thing and do it well. That's what I did with the media box I put this card in. Well, it does more than one thing, also works as a MAME box. Runs a P3 600, and has no problem recording TV in the background while playing Mortal Kombat.

      I agree with doing one thing and doing it well, but it's also nice to only have one box sitting by your TV.

      Sorry for all the compusa links... I found the card for 100 bucks and the case for 150, but I didnt feel like googling for better links.

    8. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by irving47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You really do need to go ahead and get one. It probably sounds cliche to say, "It will change your TV viewing experience," but, "It WILL change your TV viewing experience." :)

      Mods: -1 Redundant! Thpbpbpbbt.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    9. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by irving47 · · Score: 1

      I think the tivo hackers would do that also. They'd probably use tvguide.com/listings or something similar if TiVo's guide stopped. I just don't see that happening though. I think they're going to pull it off. Hopefully alone.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    10. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by zsmooth · · Score: 1

      A Tivo's not for you then.

    11. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      Hopefully Tivo won't go the same route. Fortunately, if it did, the active Tivo hackers community would probably provide some solutions for replacing the discontinued service portion of the Tivo product.

      I'm not a Tivo owner yet, but I will be soon. Anyhow, I heard something about DirecTV's Tivos only working with DTV and other Tivos not working with DTV.. Does that mean that DTV is providing the Tivo service to their customers? Are DTV customers then protected in the event that Tivo goes belly up?

      -matt

    12. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DirecTV Tivos are part of the satellite reciever box... it's not designed to work with anything else.

      Regular tivos will work just fine with a directv receiver though.

    13. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the other day when I reading about eh mythTV project... Could we not get the XML-TV feed and apply it to the TiVo database.... Just a thought

    15. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, ChaoticChaos. If several thousand whiny nerds buy a product or use a service, you should too.

      Google TiVo Linux. Linux Gentoo Google TiVo. TiVo ThinkGeek Copyleft.net Debian. Google Lego Lord of the Rings Linux. Linux TiVo Gentoo.

    16. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV is a mindless stream of homogenized "news" and "discussion" that panders only to the very lowest denominator. That's why I don't watch TV.

      I prefer to read Slashdot.

    17. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by jandrese · · Score: 1

      DirecTivos don't work on a DirectTV system because they save money by pulling out the MPEG encoder chip and just writing the compressed streams directly on the HDD. That's why they don't work with regular TV, it isn't already compressed for them. The DirctTivos still use the same guide data though, so they'll still be up a creek if Tivo goes under (although they'll still work as a regular cable box). That's also why DirecTiVos are cheaper than regular TiVos.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    18. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm just hoping that someone releases a DVR, and before eveyone startes screaming TiVo i said DVR not PVR. As in a dumb box that doesn't have a service, taht doesn't require a phone line that is just a VCR with a HDD. I don't care about comercial skipping, or it knowing what's on. I just want it to be able to record (preferably 2 programs at a time but 1 will do) to an internal HDD. I HATED Tivo. First it kept trying to dial the phone while i was ON IT! It started taping things I didn't want.....I watch Law and Order all the time, so it started taping NYPD Blue which i don't like...couldn't get it to stop taping it. Infact on 2 occations it taped that INSTEAD of what i asked it to tape at the same time. When I went on vacation it had tried to dial up it's home base, somehow froze and left my phone off the hook for almost a week. Then TiVo wanted $250 to replace the internal modem to fix it..... I know i'm probably in the minority having had this kinda problems, but I really didn't want the menus and all the extras in the first place. I just want a basic DVR! Ok, i'l stop ranting and raving now.

    19. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Anyhow, I heard something about DirecTV's Tivos only working with DTV and other Tivos not working with DTV.

      Standalone TiVos work just fine with DirecTV. DirecTiVo works better, though, because it eliminates a digital-to-analog-to-digital conversion. (FWIW, I use a standalone TiVo with digital cable and haven't noticed any degradation. That might be the result of recording everything at best quality, though.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    20. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Well, I read somewhere that TIVO had a 'failsafe' type plan, that if they went bankrupt...they had a way of people opening their units up...so that they would not completely shut down due to lack of a service call. I do not know if this is true, but, sounds reasonable. I would think possibly ReplayTV would have a company 'deathmode' type software switch that could be thrown....any one else heard or know of something on this?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Eccles · · Score: 1

      /.ers have got me seriously thinking about getting a Tivo. Everyone seems to like it so much.

      Either that, or a HTPC (Home theater PC.) I got one with a DVD writer to serve as the latter; via the network I can also use it for generic data backup for my main PC. No chance of that going out of business, you can upgrade for HDTV, play hi-res MOVs/AVIs/etc., use it as an MP3/Ogg player, expand it trivially, etc. You pay for it in (probably) a higher initial price and a less convenient set-up, though.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    22. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the Hauppauge unit doesn't work in Canada. It uses TitanTV for listings, and they're USA only. I guess I'm stuck with ATI...

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    23. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This appears to be outright B.S. Tivo never would record a suggestion instead of something you told it to record... and if you want it to stop recording suggestions completely you just toggle that option off.. Tivo is very smart and user friendly software for those of us that bother to set the ridiculously easy options. I love mine.

    24. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      The one I had was never that user friendly. I will admit that I had kind of an early model, but after spending alot of money and having that many problems, i really am not big on PVRs.

    25. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by thynk · · Score: 1

      Can the TiVO stream live tv from my home network to my PC at work so I don't miss SouthPark?

      NO? Then I'll just continue using my ATI All in Wonder card as a TiVO type device.

      Kind of sad that I have to pay $75 a month for the 4 channels I watch 3 times a week. At least my kids will get some use out of it while they visit.

      OTOH, I really like my RioVolt MP3 Player. Maybe I'll pick up one of the higher end models on clearance somewhere.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    26. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your mom prefers to suck my cock.

    27. Re:Keeping my fingers crossed for Tivo by weaknees · · Score: 1

      Actually, the DirecTV/TiVo units pull the guide data from the satellite. The guide data is from DirecTV, not TiVo, but the TiVos still have to dial in to TiVo. If TiVo were in trouble, DirecTV would no doubt have a way to avoid the dial-in issue. I wouldn't be surprised if it was in the DirecTV/TiVo contract now.

  5. A bargain opportunity, perhaps? by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, what kind of opportunities does this present to the home user? Presumably we're going to see lots of these units showing up on eBay - can't you just use it as a standalone PVR without the service???

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:A bargain opportunity, perhaps? by stevel · · Score: 1

      Some Replay models can be used without a subscription, some can't... The current models require a subscription. I am a TiVo user, not Replay, but I'd assume that people who already have Replay units shouldn't fear that their boxes will turn into doorstops overnight. The data service should continue for some time to come.

      It does not bode particularly well for future development of the line, but who knows what D&M will do with it?

    2. Re:A bargain opportunity, perhaps? by flagstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There have been a few posts along the line of "is my ReplayTV worthless without the service" ... but the article doesn't actually say that the service is going away, just that the assets have been sold to D&M. It's early days yet, but has anyone seen anything about their intensions? It's possible (maybe not likely, though) that the service and development will continue under the new owners.

      --
      These people have looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    3. Re:A bargain opportunity, perhaps? by jbarr · · Score: 4, Informative

      To answer your question specifically, NO. The current version of the ReplayTV software requires service connection. If there is no guide information, you CANNOT record anything. For newer boxes, if you paid for the lifetime service, you can use it to manually record, but if you are paying month-to-month, then you are outa luck. As for older models, you need the guide information to record.

      Also, and this is critical, service connection is required to set the clock.

      I have three ReplayTV boxes ("upgraded" 2001, stock 2020, and new 5040), and if the service gets cut, I am screwed.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    4. Re:A bargain opportunity, perhaps? by markr · · Score: 1

      That's incorrect. You can do manual recording without the service, at least on the 3 year old 2020 unit I've got. And in my typical bad timing, I just ordered a new one which is currently in transit...

      -Mark

  6. Too bad. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wished Matsushita Electric (the parent company of Panasonic) had bought out SonicBlue at least a couple of years ago.

    Panasonic could have kept the ReplayTV PVR and Rio players as a viable line of products or at least incorporated its technology into Panasonic products.

    This is why I think TiVo will be purchased by Sony fairly soon, given that Sony already is committed to using Linux for consumer product development and also Sony is a TiVo licensee. Given Sony's name recognition, TiVo products could really become popular under Sony's stewardship.

    1. Re:Too bad. by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's an interesting one... Sony products do resemble the quality that the Rio line had.

      I dropped my original Rio on hard tile floor once. The front little controll pad popped off and the battery fell out. It still works to this day.

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    2. Re:Too bad. by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Actually, Panasonic has their own interesting hard drive/DVD-R/RAM recording product. It doesn't seem to have the same guide capabilities, but the fact that it can record to both DVD and the hard drive makes it quite an interesting product. You can check out the specs here.

  7. What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by Clockwurk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm kind of curious why Diamond and its offshoots have such a tough time staying afloat in today's market. Diamond made really good video cards, then got bought S3 (and hasn't been seen since). Now Sonicblue (Diamond Rio) has gone under. I really want to know if they just weren't as popular a brand as I thought or if they were very poorly managed.

    1. Re:What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cause the products and support where crap! They could have cornered the mp3 player market except their stuff was cheaply made and badly designed. Their Rio backpack was a stupid idea, proprietary memory/battery made with crappy parts. Guess they wanted everyone to buy new backpacks every couple of months after the cheap rechargeable battery dies. Too bad they where stupid enough to make the battery easily replaceable.

    2. Re:What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've heard from a person or two who used to work there, they were very poorly managed--rampant internal problems from massive employee theft to bungled (if not outright fraudulent) accounting.

      After the reorganization that led to the creation of Sonicblue (the video card operations were sold off, I think to ATI), they never really got back on their feet. Cool MP3 players are a nice "in addition to" business but not a core business, and once they bought ReplayTV it all but vanished from the marketplace--I don't know what happened with that, but I'm guessing they zigged when the market zagged.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see here...

      Diamond video cards worked fine, but they were virtually identical to the S3 and 3DFX reference boards.

      Their drivers were known to be buggy and loaded with weird stuff (e.g. the click on the desktop, get the start menu stuff they put in their 95/98 video drivers). So you were better off with the S3 drivers shipped with your OS or the S3 reference drivers.

      Their support and commitment to their customers sucked. I had a Diamond ISDN adapter, a couple of months after I bought mine (this was like 1998) I found out the drivers would not work with the latest NT4 service pack. Call Diamond. They tell me they know about the problem but have no plans to release updated drivers. Ever.

      Don't even get me started on the support issues with their earlier MP3 players.

      You treat your customers like that, you go under. At least you should. It really is that simple.

    4. Re:What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by thoennes · · Score: 1

      You go under if you're not a monopoly.

      There must be some math to this. Capitalism natuarally forms monopolies. Monopolies naturally prevent capitalism. This would say that capitalism is inherently unstable.

    5. Re:What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by FuzzyDice · · Score: 0

      S3 = Sonicblue. They changed their name 4 years ago to better reflect their change in focus. news.com.com

    6. Re:What's wrong with Diamond MM??? by lanner · · Score: 1

      Poor managment. You are right. Their products were pretty good. They could have been making Nvidia based video cards these days, but being bought by a stupid compnay like S3 killed them. S3 has only made poor performing video chipset in the last few years.

      Mismanagment.

  8. Damn! by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought the original Rio, I bought the RIO mp3-cd player, and I even had bought stock. I was hoping that they would turn it around after seeing their advisory a few months ago. It's too bad that SonicBlue didn't capture the digital media market, they entered too early.

    I guess when the big coporations started selling their mp3 players it was all over. Damn.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      and I even had bought stock

      Hahahaha, I'm laughing at you, and not with you!

    2. Re:Damn! by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 2, Funny

      I already sold it... I KNEW someone was gonna score a funny moderation point off that one!

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    3. Re:Damn! by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      I also had the original Rio PMP300 and my Rio mp3-cd player is sitting in my car to this day, with an iRock hooked up to it so my radio can play it. (no CD in my car stereo.)

      Great products. The Diamond Viper Ultra 770 was a hell of a card.

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  9. TiVO may benefit...or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, now that SonicBlue seems to be out of the picture, now the only major retailer of PVR technology is TiVO. Unless you count UltimateTV, which I guess is still being sold, but I haven't seen ads or any indication of Microsoft pushing it for a long time.

    Tivo COULD do well by this, since if support for ReplayTV drops dead, users of ReplayTV will still want SOME kind of PVR (and I'm not talking about those who are willing to waste days and weeks hacking the box, here)...or, could make it harder on them, since the MPAA and their relatives now only have one big company to focus on.

    The next business quarter will probably be a turning point for PVR technology. TiVO has a better chance of surviving if those that are orphaned by ReplayTV move over to it. If they don't, TiVO instead will be 'hanging on' for some time, and its fate (and ability to manage lawsuits like the one ReplayTV got, DMCA-wise) will be a lot more uncertain.

    1. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by Dielectric · · Score: 3, Interesting

      TiVO shouldn't have any more problems with lawsuits than it has right now. By not having a few key features that ReplayTV had, TiVO has successfully skirted a lot of those issues. Commerical skipping and program sharing were two biggies that would likely bring down the thunder, but TiVO has smartly avoided that. Yes, I know TiVO has a secret code for 30-second skip, but I tried it and it sucked. I like the fast-forward much better.

      The TiVO hacking community has been careful about allowing program sharing for these reasons as well. None of us want to see TiVO go down for some dumb lawsuit.

      I think this is probably good for TiVO in some respects, but the uncertainty it will cast for PVRs in general will probably overshadow the good bits. Man, double metaphor. What do I win?

    2. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Go check the statistic for yourself, but DishPVR has a larger customer base than TiVo at this time.

      Microsoft discontinued their side of the UltimateTV product line and sold the ongoing support to DirecTV.

      TiVo is more widely known because they have been friendly to their customers, and have not fought customers that are interested in seeing what more they can do with the TiVo products, so long as theft of service is not an issue.

      TiVo has also been reasonably sensible wrt usability and features when it comes to protecting the broadcasters. The 30 second skip is not advertized as a feature, and is not documented in the product literature. It is not a blank seaker, which is more accurately what Replay did, so you do have to fiddle around looking for the end of the commercials, though it is not as bad as watching 20 30 second comercials every 5 min of programming.

      Then again, that's my opinion. You have fun with your own.

      -Rusty

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by Scyber · · Score: 1

      ReplayTV may survive in one form or another. It is too early to tell what the intentions of D&M (the company buying the replay & Rio assets) are.

    4. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      If TiVO is smart, they'll offer a subscription service to the Replay customers. Extry revenue!

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    5. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by zsmooth · · Score: 4, Informative

      TiVo is more widely known because they have been friendly to their customers, and have not fought customers that are interested in seeing what more they can do with the TiVo products, so long as theft of service is not an issue.

      Preface: I have Tivo. I love Tivo.

      The Series 2 (with 3.2 software) is hardly hackable at all. A boot PROM checks the signatures of the kernel and all startup files and replaces anything which has been changed before booting. No adding anything to rc init files like on the Series 1. A couple hackers at tivocommunity have socketed their PROM chips and flashed new ones which bypass the ROM checks, but they still haven't succeeded in getting MyWorld (the main tivo app) up and running.

      Even if they do manage it, which I'm sure they will, socketing your PROM is still way out of the level of expertise of almost all Tivo users. The general consensus is that the chip is not flashable on board either (long debates about this, as some Tivos appear to ship with PROMs that ARE flashable on board, but even on those there's no way to actually run a flashing utility on the machine since there's no way to get a shell prompt once the box boots because you need to disable the PROM... you see where this is going.)

      I don't fault Tivo for this - they are certainly showing they work hard to keep people from being able to extract video, which will probably be good for them in the long run. They're still cool about hard drive upgrades, but that's about all the hacking you can do on the newest units.

    6. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by zsmooth · · Score: 1

      By the way, if anyone's interested more in this PROM stuff, the thread to read is here.

    7. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      First off, the fact that DishPVR has a larger customer base than TiVo can be explained easily, and is a statistics gimmick. Dish dropped EVERY one of it's recievers execpt for the PVRs and one ultra-low-end model, thus giving customers who want a better box no choice. In addition, Dish is now giving away one PVR, and one low-end reciever to all new customers (darn... all I got was one low-end box)/

      In terms of customer satisfaction, TiVo definitely rules all, and this will ultimately determines the fate of the companies. SonicBlue was known for horrible support, and I believe that the hardware was rumored to be of a lower quality than TiVo. TiVo is known for great customer relations (they even encourage their employees to post in unofficial tivo-related message boards. how many companies do THAT?)
      The TiVo software couldn't be easier to use, anybody in my family can use it. Replay is harder to use, but not frustratingly so. The dish PVR510 software sucks (haven't used the 721 yet). Pause, rewind, etc. work like they do on TiVo, but the similarities end there. "Season Passes" on the Dish unit work based upon time, not program (similar to they way in which you can program a VCR). Searching for programs to record (IMHO, TiVo's most valuable feature) only works a few days into the future, and takes about 2 minutes per search. The box simply doesn't stand up against the Tivo

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    8. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Go check the statistic for yourself, but DishPVR has a larger customer base than TiVo at this time."

      That's because Echostar gave away 500,000 units for free.

    9. Re:TiVO may benefit...or not by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I have the Canadian ExpressVU 5800, which is similar to the 508 offered by Dish Network in the US.

      Currently due to Tivo (and I suppose Sonicblue) not offering their products in Canada, there is NO OTHER PVR HERE. Yes, you read that right, there is exactly ONE PVR service in Canada and ExpressVU has it.

      I'm still at a loss to understand why Tivo is dragging their ass in getting their system installed up here. It's cold here, it rains a lot, people watch a helluva lot of TV. Bring the damn thing here and you'll make a FORTUNE.

      The 5800 isn't anywhere near as good as the Tivo software, but it sure beats the hell out of nothing at all. Sure, the big feature I'd like is the season pass option, being able to search at least a week ahead of time, and some other minor software functionality tweaks.

      The 2 minutes per search thing may be due to the network there? Executing a 2 day search on my machine takes about 10 seconds per search.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  10. ReplayTV gone? by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't ReplayTV is going to disappear anytime soon. The company may be liquidating it's assets but anything(ReplayTV subscriptions) that has a steady revenue stream is bound to be of interest to someone.

    1. Re:ReplayTV gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't ReplayTV is going to disappear anytime soon. The company may be liquidating it's assets but anything (ReplayTV subscriptions) that has a steady revenue stream is bound to be of interest to someone.

      I wish it was easy for me to believe that. If all the million people who bought a ReplayTV did so month to month (and some didn't, because they got lifetime subscriptions, and that money is long gone now), that's still only $15 million a month.

      Northpoint's thousands of subscribers were axed by AT&T in 2001 with an agregate worth of a LOT more than that. I wouldn't count on ReplayTV service being saved for this amount. It isn't very much, and TiVO can't pipe their info into the ReplayTV anyway, because someone else owns the hardware assets and schematics (thus, methods into the boxes). Expect TiVO to do $50-100 rebates or something for former ReplayTV owners, on the condition that they send in their old boxes, post-haste.

    2. Re:ReplayTV gone? by SkreamNet · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression, at least a year ago, that ReplayTV wasn't subscription based, rather the higher price of the units reflected what was equal to a lifetime subscription.

    3. Re:ReplayTV gone? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True for the older units, like mine, but not for the newer ones.

      I'm pretty sure the company that's buying Replay, D&M holdings will use this opportunity to invalidate the lifetime subscriptions for the older players, in an attempt to either force us to buy new units, or cough up subscription fees.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    4. Re:ReplayTV gone? by DustMagnet · · Score: 1

      The Anonymous "Reader" who sent this certainly had an axe to gride. Chapter 11 isn't "a goner". I'm sure someone will pick this stuff up. They get the Replay unit without the debt, nice deal. My biggest worry is they will settle the court case and I'll lose my automatic commercial skipping.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    5. Re:ReplayTV gone? by coloth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      use this opportunity to invalidate the lifetime subscriptions for the older players, in an attempt to either force us to buy new units, or cough up subscription fees.

      I hope you're wrong, and I think it would be very foolish of D&M to do this. I am one of the early ReplayTV customers. I have a Replay 2020 which I've upgraded, swapping in an 80GB drive for the 20GB. The original cost of the machine to me was $700, and the drive cost about $300 (80GB were just out at the time).

      So, with $1000 sunk into my machine, I was hoping to not replace it until I jump to HD, probably next year.

      What I would say is that, this may be kind of like the airlines and their frequent fliers. If an airline goes into bankrupcy, the mileage plans are generally safe because the company doesn't want to alienate their best customers.

      I think the same may apply here.

      However, when I upgrade to an HD unit in the next 18 months, I fully expect to pay a monthly. So, if they're nice to me, they might have a nice little sale there.

      --

      Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

    6. Re:ReplayTV gone? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      I hope you're right. I hadn't considered that they might be smart enough to realize that us early adopters are their best bet to buy an HD product (providing its not crippled by excessive DRM).

      Mine's a 2020 as well, 100 GB drive here. :)

      I'm a bit jaded by the manufacturers who try to weasel out of commitments whenever possible.

      I also got screwed out of about 3 grand by HomeLife when they went Chapter 11 without delivering my furniature (could have been worse, I did get 2 grand back...) so Chapter 11 is not a phrase I react charitably to.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    7. Re:ReplayTV gone? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      The Anonymous "Reader" who sent this certainly had an axe to gride.

      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." - Somebody, but nobody's sure who really said it.

    8. Re:ReplayTV gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that expression, but "that $140 deal on Amazon isn't looking so hot now, is it?" isn't just stupid, it's clearly intended to be mean.

  11. Arghh.... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After much research I bought my ReplayTV a month ago. I love the thing. With the commercial skip and the quick advance, I actually enjoy my favorite shows now.

    I wonder if D&M will try to maintain the unique value that ReplayTV presents. It is a hackers paradise. I also paid my $299 for lifetime activation. I also got an e-mail asking about a future product that was just a ReplayTV player that would stream video from your recorder to the player in another room. I was really excited about that as well...

    SonicBlue did such a great job buying up all these cool gadgets, I wonder what really went to their demise?

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    1. Re:Arghh.... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way. I bought a Rio S35S yesterday and just before seeing this story I bought the 256 MB MMC expansion card. This little thing is so cool and small I hope they continue to produce and support them. The iPod is really cool too, but I wanted something _tiny_ as possible and with 384 MB in such a small package I am happy.

    2. Re:Arghh.... by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I think a better product is the Cowon iAudio CW200.

      It has 256 MB of memory (not quite the 384 MB that your Rio has), and looks to be smaller than the Rio. And it has a much more compact shape and in my judgement, is more pleasing to the eye.

      I bought one for my wife and she loves it ...

    3. Re:Arghh.... by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      Looks pretty neat.

    4. Re:Arghh.... by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 1

      SonicBlue did such a great job buying up all these cool gadgets, I wonder what really went to their demise?

      Cool gadgets do not a profitable company make.

    5. Re:Arghh.... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Cool gadgets do not a profitable company make.

      What about Frigidaire? Thank you ladies and germs, I'll be here all week. Enjoy the buffet.

    6. Re:Arghh.... by nbvb · · Score: 1
      Cool gadgets do not a profitable company make.


      A.
      P.
      P.
      L.
      E.
    7. Re:Arghh.... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 1

      Well, I meant cool gadgets are a minimal requirement , in my opinion. Obviously it had to be mis-managemement or something else.

      Someone replied Apple, and I agree, they show how you can make a profit off of cool gadgets.

      I looked at SonicBlue's financial statement and they lost 30 million on 60 million revenue. Something is wacked when you can't you lose that much money... The sad thing is that someone else will be able to pick up their cool gadgets for 10 cents on the dollar and make a profit (I hope). Oh well...

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
  12. Can't say I'm sad by Bastian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My brother and I have both owned RioVolt players. Between the way they both just quit working after about a year (as did their replacements) and the way they had this habit of just crashing if you push the volume button too quickly or when they encountered a cooked mp3, I'm not too happy with the quality of their products. To make matters worse, I have tried to use their e-mail tech support several times, and have never been able to get a response.

    1. Re:Can't say I'm sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never had any problems with mine.
      Maybe if you didn't urinate on it so frequently you'd have better luck.

    2. Re:Can't say I'm sad by lvdrproject · · Score: 1
      Indeed. I got a RioVolt SP250 in November of 2001, and i haven't had a single problem with it. Aside from the lack of Vorbis support, and the slightly large form factor (when compared to iRivers, at least), i'd say it's one of the best MP3/CD players around. Certainly better than those horrible Sony ones with the red back-lit screens, and the RCA ones. I haven't tried iRiver, but i suspect that the world champion title for MP3/CD players is between Rio and iRiver.

      But i don't know. Maybe the older models (SP150, SP50, &c.) were genuinely bad. The parent gives the impression that he owned a RioVolt (though perhaps not the same one) for at least 2 years, so i don't know. Not sure when the SP250 came out.

      Eh, that's my experience, anyway.

  13. Well, scratch that idea by EvilStein · · Score: 0

    Just last night I was talking to my girlfriend about getting a ReplayTV.

    Guess it's gonna be a Tivo after all. Once someone gets the Series II Tivo/DirecTV (all in one) units in stock.

    Think the new parent company will keep making them?

    1. Re:Well, scratch that idea by Malc · · Score: 1

      "Once someone gets the Series II Tivo/DirecTV (all in one) units in stock."

      I despise these integrated units. It makes it rather hard changing services. I want a PVR with built-in digital decoder so that it can run independently of service and set-top box.

    2. Re:Well, scratch that idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get the standard Tivo unit and hook it up. The video quality is excelent when I record a channel from my Digital Cable box (for those channels which are digital that is.).

      Yes, it does, somewhat degrade the image, but not enough that I care.

      Now if I could just legitimatly get Canadian guide data I'd be happy...

    3. Re:Well, scratch that idea by cob666 · · Score: 1

      Tweeter usually has the Hughes model in stock. I'd really like to see Sony release a DirecTivo unit though!

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    4. Re:Well, scratch that idea by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Then get any of the TiVo SA products.

      What you are looking for is a built-in Digital Encoder, as the signal from your sat receiver will be analog.

      The integrated pvr/sat receiver system uses a digital receiver (actually two) that processes the digital stream, and stores it decoded-re-encoded on the hard drive, then uses a single decoder to display the stream to your TV.

      There are also HDTV capable receivers, which will use a system similar to the sat receiver systems to store the digital stream from your local TV stations if that is available.

      Enjoy.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    5. Re:Well, scratch that idea by telstar · · Score: 1

      I've got a deal link to the Hughes Series II on my website if you're interested. The nice thing about those is that the service is only $5 a month and you can record one channel while watching another.

  14. TiVo is becoming a verb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Much like Google. Even if it's not in everyone's homes yet, most people know what it is. ReplayTV was just their unsuccesful competitor.

    1. Re:TiVo is becoming a verb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is, unfortunately, meaningless to the success or failure of the company.

      If you don't believe me, go look up the history of the Escalator corporation. Or buy a Xerox-brand xerox machine. Or a PC, you know, from IBM.

      The term is "brand-category" and it can be as much a curse as a blessing. I agree completely with the poster who said their savior would be getting bought by a CE company.

  15. Make Replay Open Source! by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it would benefit the customers if they were to make Replay Open Source. The vast experience and technical know-how of the Open Source developer community would allow the natural evolution of Replay which would introduce a lot of new functionality.

    It would be a shame not allow the Open Source developer community complete access to Replay.

    Only when we provide a simple way of cracking encrypted PayTV channels can we wrest control away from HBO.

    Which is nice.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:Make Replay Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going Open Source does not benefit "customers". No offense, but if you're reading slashdot, you really aren't counted in any demographic survey...

      Getting the technology pervasive across multiple companies, now THAT would help customers. Getting Replay inside of the other D&M products would be cool. Combining that technology with the other D&M tech company (Mediabolic) would be cool too.

    2. Re:Make Replay Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      They won't, because making the code open source will hugely reduce its value. It would actually be illegal to do this.

      As for "wresting control from HBO" ... uh... excuse me?

      If you don't like HBO's prices, don't pay for the service. You have no right to the content for free just because you own a TV.

    3. Re:Make Replay Open Source! by RatBastard · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes! That's how to fix everything! Starving children? Make farming Open Source! War with Iraq? Make GW Bush Open Source! Can't get laid? Make women Open Source!

      Bah!

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    4. Re:Make Replay Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god, you've just solved all the world's problems in one fell swoop!

    5. Re:Make Replay Open Source! by Artifex · · Score: 2, Informative
      It would be a shame not allow the Open Source developer community complete access to Replay.


      Even if they don't, as long as their schedule subscription service stays around, it's still a good box for hackers to play with - the 4xxxx and 5xxxx series talk to each other with a kind of XML to send programs back and forth, and they have NICs on board, so as you can imagine, it's not impossible to write software for your computer that emulates the request functions of another ReplayTV and sends the program direct to your hard drive in a nice MPEG format.

      I was looking into getting one, and if there's confirmation that the service will continue for at least 3 years, I'll probably buy one with a lifetime subscription (which apparently allows manual recording) based on this... just think - a PVR that you don't have to upgrade the drive for internally, because you can download everything from it (and back to it), and no hacking shell necessary.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  16. chapter 11 dosent mean theyre dead by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Informative

    It means theyre fucked up, and need some time to gather their maoney and pay off debts. Its not good, but its not the end.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:chapter 11 dosent mean theyre dead by SkreamNet · · Score: 1

      If they're selling off their assets (which are all their product lines) to repay debts, what would be left to continue to operate? They'd have nothing to sell.

  17. No Surprise by Jack+Comics · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is no surprise. I saw this coming months ago. In early December of 2002, I purchased a Sonicblue ReplayTV 5040 as an early Christmas present for myself. I set it up three weeks later, the week of Christmas. It worked fine for about a month, no problems. However, suddenly, while watching a recorded episode of "Enterprise" on Sunday, January 19th, about halfway through the episode, the ReplayTV got stuck, with no movement whatsoever. The unit failed to respond to any remote control-issued commands. I then turned the power off and back on, and it was stuck at the boot-up screen. I tried unplugging it altogether, replugging it, but got the same thing. I called Sonicblue technical support a few days later, and they agreed that the machine was broke, and asked me to send it in and I'd get a new ReplayTV 5040 unit in return ASAP.

    I shipped out my broken ReplayTV 5040 unit, waited about two weeks, and did not hear or receive anything from Sonicblue, and noticed that my credit card was still being charged the monthly service fee. I called Sonicblue back up, and asked what was going on, and they said they were out of ReplayTV 5040s, and asked me to be patient while I wait to get mine. I noticed the last week of February, that I was charged another monthly service fee. I called Sonicblue back up for a third time, and they said they would suspend my account temporarily until I got my new ReplayTV, but they would not refund me the two months of service charges that I got no service for. When I asked what the status was of my new ReplayTV 5040 unit, I was told they still have not received any new units, and asked me to continue being patient and wait.

    Well, it's a month later, two months after I sent my broken ReplayTV 5040 unit into Sonicblue, and I still haven't received a new or repaired unit. At this point, I doubt I ever will. Oh well, that was $320 wasted. :(

    From what I hear, TiVo has been having similar trouble. It's a shame, DVR was a fantastic idea, but it doesn't appear to have really caught on with the consumers, and being fought by Hollywood and television executives didn't help any. I guess I should just go back to using a VCR and buy a Super VHS VCR in the meantime, heh.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:No Surprise by Sircus · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you bought it with your credit card, talk to your credit card company. You should be able to get a full refund, with the possible exception of the service fee for the month for which you did have service.

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    2. Re:No Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can prove when you sent your unit in, and have evidence of payment for services (that you did not get), take them to small claims court.

    3. Re:No Surprise by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

      However, suddenly, while watching a recorded episode of "Enterprise" on Sunday, January 19th, about halfway through the episode, the ReplayTV got stuck, with no movement whatsoever.

      That's a new feature in the latest PVRs. They can detect when you've been laying around in Cheetos-stained underwear watching Star Trek for more then 7 hours. They're doing this to avoid lawsuits from fat people for ruining their lives.

    4. Re:No Surprise by Ixitar · · Score: 1

      I am assuming that you paid for your unit with a credit card. Talk with your credit card company and dispute the charges. You got a lemon and now they are not replacing it and you don't even have the lemon.

    5. Re:No Surprise by Babbster · · Score: 1
      "DVR" (I'll use PVR from here on out) isn't going anywhere. It may change its public form (there may eventually be no "TiVo" or "ReplayTV") but Dish Network has done quite well selling their PVRs and DirecTV subscribers have bought quite a few PVR units (most with the TiVo brand).

      Personally, I have two of the older Replay units (and I'll just pray that they keep up the service for us), and despite isolated problems I have to say that my experience with them has been extremely positive. If I lose the service, it will rush me toward picking up a couple of the [relatively cheap at $199] older Dish PVR systems and wait for HD recording capability to be introduced before picking up an even newer one.

      In this house, at least, PVR capability is sticking around, even if I eventually have to roll my own. I simply can't do without it anymore.

    6. Re:No Surprise by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Well, it's a month later, two months after I sent my broken ReplayTV 5040 unit into Sonicblue, and I still haven't received a new or repaired unit. At this point, I doubt I ever will. Oh well, that was $320 wasted. :(


      Hopefully you used a full-service credit card. You should be able to get the charges reversed on at least the two months you were fraudulently charged, and possibly get something back on purchase protection, since the company sold you a defective product and went defunct before replacing it.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    7. Re:No Surprise by eMilkshake · · Score: 1

      You really should contact your credit card company. They can be good at helping the consumer and doing a charge back to a provider that is, in effect, committing fraud.

  18. Not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (sigh) Another fine US electronics company bites the dust... When are American companies going to learn that overhyping, overmarketing, underdeveloping products just doesn't work? I'm so tired of buying products that look they were beta tested by chimps. Look at the Motorola T720 cell phone released by Verizon... This one passed through Verizon's supposedly rigorous testing process. The software on the first release was so buggy that Verizon actually recalled the hardware, even though a simple software upgrade would've sufficed. The lastest firmware versions aren't much better. It took me five minutes to realize that the software was sh*t, due to the screen being garbled by going through menus.

    Even the company that makes Chia pets recently filed for bankruptcy. Apparently there was too much money being spent on "Ch-Ch-Ch-Chia" ads and not enough on quality control. Rumor has it that over 50% of the Chia pets that made it to store shelves were cracked or broken. Of the remaining good ones, 4% had missing seed packets (!) and 8% had dud seeds. Depressing.

    1. Re:Not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does a US company actually MAKE the Chias?! I guess I always assumed they were made in China and boxed up in that 70's style packaging.

      Anyway, good riddance. I don't understand how a company who makes fuzzy green ceramic sheep can ever exist in the first place.

    2. Re:Not another one! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Chia pets were a fad, like mood rings or the pet rock.

      Hardly an example for the failure of the american technocracy.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hardly an example for the failure of the american technocracy.

      True, but I believe the types of problems the poster described are indicative of the low quality we can expect from many goods and services nowadays, fad or no fad.

      I think that spending money on advertising that could be used to improve quality is typical today. Maybe it does work in many cases? (As for chia pets, I have no idea about their quality as I never had one.)

    4. Re:Not another one! by boskone · · Score: 1

      I can agree with you that a lot of products today are pretty junky, but I have to disagree on the T720. I got mine from ATT so maybe there's a different version of software on it, but it works dandy. i've had it two months and put probably 30 voice hours on it plus 5 wireless web hours and it's been great.

      I'm sorry you've had bad experiences though, I hope mine doesn't suffer a similar fate.

    5. Re:Not another one! by brianosaurus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't understand what that has to do with Sonic Blue. They don't make Motorola phones or Chia Pets. They do make the ReplayTV, and I don't think they overhyped or overmarketed it. And I definitely don't think it was underdeveloped, though it does have room for improvement.

      On the hype side, they couldn't hype this thing enough. I bought one of the first generation units, and was hooked. I can't watch TV without it anymore. I no longer have to schedule anything around TV shows. Everyone I know who has a ReplayTV (or Tivo) thinks it is the best thing ever. If you haven't used one or don't watch TV, it does sound ridiculous. But if you got one for a week or so, you'd realize how great it is.

      As for marketing, I have seen a few ads in magazines for Tivo and Replay. I think I may have seen a Tivo commercial on TV. That is a far cry from overmarketed.

      Perhaps if they had been able to market better, there would have been more success. People see PVRs as "fancy VCRs", and in that respect can't justify the price tag. VCRs are in teh $100 range, so why spend $500+ for the "same thing".

      And as for "underdeveloped", I disagree. This was a totally new type of device. Yes, it is the digital evolution of the VCR, but it went WAY beyond that. When I tried out the DishPVR (long after I was a replay convert), it was basically a digital VCR. All recordings were time+channel based (thursday 8:00-8:30 ch 5). The DishPVR simply replaced a VHS tape with a hard drive.

      ReplayTV and Tivo, on the other hand, took advantage of the hard drive and the fact that the device was a computer and did much more. You could record every episode of Friends just by setting up a show-based recording. It could catch the prime-time episode and all reruns on any station. If a show changes time slots, the replaytv follows it (South Park is a good example). Tivo can even reccommend shows for you based on what you choose to record, though I've never used that feature (i watch enough TV as it is.. I don't need my TV telling me to watch more).

      Neither device ever seemed like beta quality to me, or like it was released too soon. There are occasional glitches, but they are few and far between (far less than on some popular computer operation systems). I think both companies knew they were breaking new ground, and knew that they couldn't survive with a half-assed product.

      I think this is another case of a product that was ahead of its time. As I said above, most people don't get it. Its one of those things you have to try in order to understand what it really does for you. The TV industry was against it because it changed their model, and just like the RIAA says, change is bad.

      While this may be "another fine US electronics company bit[ing] the dust", its surely not for the reasons you suggest.

      --
      blog
    6. Re:Not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Motorola phones are steaming piles of shite. Didn't you ever see the T120 on T-Mobile - the worst phone I have ever seen.

    7. Re:Not another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree. I think US businesses, despite their apparent strength, are in fact quite week. I'm a Saudi businessman in the import- export business, so as you might guess, my frequent travels take me to many places around the world, on every continent.


      I wanted to share my experience in the "great" country of America.


      So, I was in Chicago, Illinous last March for about a week on business. A bit of background: Chicago is a crime-ridden city in the middle of farms, full of half-occupied skyscrapers. The main industry seems to be stock manipulations, and the hotel valet gave me strong directions not to talk a single block off my path. But as a professional I had to see what I was getting into. The squalor and poverty rivaled that of a third world nation. Let me tell you this, if this is America's best, then I'd hate to see the worst.


      Anyway, when I stepped off the plane from New York (which is no paradise itself, as that place has gone down the shitter since the financial firms were convicted of fraud) I was shocked. The whole place smelled like a combination of vomit, death and human defecations that had been left out in the sun for a day or so. And it was probably BECAUSE there was vomit and human defecations all over, with many people seemingly terribly drunk or even near death, lying in agony in the streets from God knows what. Kids were dealing drugs on street corners, and broken glass covered the streets. I almost retched, and I've certainly been in some sketchy places in my travels but NOTHING like this.


      People spit everywhere. Trash litters the streets. I found myself looking DOWNWARD much more than looking FORWARD when I walked.


      Noise pollution is endemic. It doesn't help that their infernal language consists of gibberish that is a cacophony for any human ear to bear. How do they speak and listen to that shit without going crazy all day long is beyond me.


      Anyways, Americans stink -- literally. There is no concept of personal hygiene whatsoever. Meetings with even top officials were hourlong sessions of having to endure hot sweaty bodies that smelled like pork, and rancid breath that smelled like cheeseburgers. Geez, at least use deodorant for crying out loud. And you guys might want to try going on a diet. To the last man, every American I saw was fat and ugly, and invariably ate at "McDonald's" and "Burger King."


      The hypocrisy, corruption, and double-standards from the highest levels of government on over are the norm at the same time America claims its economy is back on the rise. Foreigners recieve bad looks and even (I heard from an associate) verbal intimidation and harassment!


      Traffic is horrible. Rules are non-existent except for at traffic lights: red means to go fast, green means to go REALLY REALLY fast.


      The whole country, in my assessment, is a lost case. I feel I will be doing more work in China and East Asia. America is obviously the benefactor (and now the victim) of an economic bubble that will put Japan's to shame. Without the moral and economic discipline possessed by the Japanese, America will never work its way out. I predict America will be widely considered a "Third-World" nation during my lifetime.


      Anyways, the one redeeming quality were the girls, who really are as easy as all the rumors. I was having dinner (by the way, how can anyone eat nothing but hamburgers all their lives, is way beyond me) with a young female business associate, and afterwards, we had a few drinks. One thing lead to another, I bought her a few drinks, and I had sex with a bright 25 year old programmer. Boy, those American girls sure can get it on -- almost as good as the Chinese. Much better than even the vaunted Thai whores, and worlds apart from anything in Europe.


      So yeah, screw the hell hole that's America. It's a lost cause of a country suspended by nothing so much as their own stupidity.

    8. Re:Not another one! by JamieF · · Score: 1

      Mr. Troll Sir, please go back to FuckedCompany where you belong. You'll get a lot more of the anti-arab racist responses you're trolling for there.

  19. TiVo's savior: Sony. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my personal opinion, the only way TiVo will continue to survive is to merge with a larger company.

    That company is Sony Corporation. There are two good reasons for this: 1) Sony already has experience using Linux for consumer products, so developing for TiVo will not require a new learning curve for their engineers, and 2) Sony already is a licensee of TiVo technology.

    With the recognition of one of the best-known brands in the world and Sony's powerful marketing muscle, Sony could incorporate TiVo technology into HDTV tuner boxes (cable, over-air, and DBS) and even onto projection TV units. It's even possible that Sony could even merge TiVo technology into products derived from the successor to the PlayStation 2.

    1. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Expect, if that happens, Sony will replace the hard drive in the Tivos with memory sticks.

    2. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by irving47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can see why a lot of people would think it would be a good match, but Sony is too big in a bad way, in that the DRM would get cumbersome and we'd end up with commercials we couldn't fast forward through, and DivX-like restrictions on movies we want to record.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    3. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe, but you know that if Sony buys TiVo you can kiss TiVo's cool hackableness goodbye.

      Sony would replace that little picket security fence that the TiVo developers put up with a big-ass "GET THE FUCK OUT" sign. And the recordings will surely be smothered in DRM.

    4. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by Hallow · · Score: 1

      The cool hackableness is pretty much gone with a TiVo Series 2 anyway.

    5. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by DdJ · · Score: 1
      Expect, if that happens, Sony will replace the hard drive in the Tivos with memory sticks.
      Hm, might be interesting to have a TiVo with memory stick support, actually. I'd like to be able to record a program to a memory stick and then plug it into my laptop to play it back later.
    6. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by luzrek · · Score: 1
      Sony is already selling a PVR with TiVo Service.

      My guess is that Sony (and other electronics manufacturers) will end up selling the hardware with TiVo continuing to exist as a service, rather than as a brand of hardware.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    7. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by satterth · · Score: 1
      Nah, that won't happen...

      First they'll out source the GUI software to some company, and they'll make it painfull to use. All the MPG video will be converted to a weird ass ATRAC type format that noone can read or view anymore. Then they will put some type of DRM stuff in that will only let you view a recorded show 3 times.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    8. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony. by weaknees · · Score: 1

      We are certainly hopeful (for many reasons) that TiVo will endure, and we suspect that if for some reason TiVo does not, then there will be an acquisition. Interestingly, though, it is DirecTV that is heavily relying on the TiVo service. Unlike the other manufacturers (Philips & Hughes) that have announced Series2 TiVo boxes, Sony has not (yet). So while the Sony SVR-3000 is a great-looking box that seems to have been designed from scratch, Sony has not yet committed to a next-generation DirecTV box (to our knowledge). Overall, I'm just not sure that Sony is the right partner. TiVo as a company has no desire to be a hardware company...they want to focus on the TiVo service and let someone else manufacture the hardware. Seems to me that, given this, it is more likely going to be a content provider (cable or satellite-type company) that is a better match if TiVo sells or is acquired.

  20. Class Action Lawsuit? by mrnick · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I purchased a Replay TV 4040 when it was bleeding edge. Now what? Am I screwed? Seems like if they stop providing the guide, with no way to get the software to use another guide they are not providing the service I paid for! Can we sue? I'm sure there will be tons of unhappy people if they just turn it off.

    Nick Powers

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
    1. Re:Class Action Lawsuit? by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, I think you're screwed Mr. Nick.

      More people in the US have outhouses than PVRs. I think that was in Newsweek or something. You may love your ReplayTV, but those poor people in the Blue Ridge Mountains don't even have indoor plumbing. Just for some perspective, I know you love your PVR as I do mine.

      You could sue, I suppose, but there would be no point in suing a company with no money!

    2. Re:Class Action Lawsuit? by guacamolefoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I purchased a Replay TV 4040 when it was bleeding edge. Now what? Am I screwed? Seems like if they stop providing the guide, with no way to get the software to use another guide they are not providing the service I paid for! Can we sue? I'm sure there will be tons of unhappy people if they just turn it off.

      Yes, you can sue. You can always sue. You will not win, because bankruptcy stays suits against the debtor. I see no reason a court would lift the automatic stay under these circumstances.

      Essentially, you are in the position of an unsecured creditor of Sonic Blue. In other words, YF, with some emphasis on the "F".

      GF.

    3. Re:Class Action Lawsuit? by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      Now is the time on Slashdot when we say, "I told you so!"

      I told you so!

      I refuse to buy Tivo, ReplayTV, or other service-based products. I'd rather throw my money at something that doesn't continually drain my checkbook. I don't own a car, either.

      You'd be amazed how cheap my living expenses are, especially considering that almost all my electronic devices have power-saving modes.

    4. Re:Class Action Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear arrogant fucktard,

      Do you subscribe to an Internet connection that "continually drains your checkbook," or do you leech off the connections at your parents' house and your school?

      You sicken us all.

      Sincerely,
      The Real World.

    5. Re:Class Action Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on not enjoying your life! Seriously though, no one cares whether you choose not to pursue ongoing expenses. I like having a car. For that matter, I like paying rent, because it beats living on the streets. Oh, and I like paying buying food and other things. It's interesting to note that I actually like doing things that cost money.

  21. FYI, chap 11 vs 7 by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the good ole US of A, chapter 11 is reorganization. This gives a the company protection from creditors to get its house in order. Companies often come out of chapter 11.

    Chapter 7 is liquidation. This company, as they say, is no more. This is for companies that are looking for an organized sell-off of assets.

    More info at 411bankruptcy.com.

    So SonicBlue is not necessarily gone for good. However, if they are selling off their major product lines, I wonder how they plan to achieve profitability.

    1. Re:FYI, chap 11 vs 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      if they are selling off their major product lines, I wonder how they plan to achieve profitability. ... must ... resist ... Aaargh!

      1. Sell of major product lines
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    2. Re:FYI, chap 11 vs 7 by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative

      It should also be pointed out that the vast majority of Chapter 11 filing fail, and the company has to end up liquidating. See Loki Games as fairly recent example of a company that filed Chapter 11 and ended up in Chapter 7. For that matter, United Airlines looks like another that's headed for the trashbin.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    3. Re:FYI, chap 11 vs 7 by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, if they are selling off their major product lines, I wonder how they plan to achieve profitability.

      My bet is that they don't plan to--they plan to take the money from the asset sales and "wind down operations," as the euphemism goes. While the usual IANAL disclaimer applies, I think the reason for Chapter 11 in this case may simply be that the Chapter 7 liquidation proceedings give less control over what's left of your company's assets, and the sale thereof, than Chapter 11 proceedings do.

    4. Re:FYI, chap 11 vs 7 by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      I think you're right.

  22. NOOOOOOO by mesach · · Score: 1

    I was hoping that thie would get better....

    I really like the replay, but after seeing MythTV I may just use that, it really looks like a nice solution, but I really wanted that channel skipping.

    NOOOOOOO....

    --
    moo.
  23. sales had to be affected by rumors by asv108 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a lot of people stayed away from purchasing ReplayTV units due to the company's financial situation. Consumers don't want to fork over $400 for a PVR when there questions as to whether the company will exist in a few months time. I think they also overestimated the market for people looking for broadband enabled PVR's. A year ago, ReplayTV's were ridiculously expensive, not many people are willing pay $1000 for a PVR. Trying to dump them on the market as a last ditch effort to get new customers just increases the speculation as to the viability of the company.

  24. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could simply restate widely held notions, as this one has done.

  25. I got one by hendridm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe he meant "debt" instead of "dept", or maybe just "from the debt dept"?

  26. Disappointed TiVo owner by mjh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As a TiVo owner, I'm really disappointed by this news. Don't get me wrong, I'm NOT disappointed by my TiVo. I love it. You can have it after you've pried it from my cold dead fingers. But competition is a good thing. I liked the fact that TiVo had competition. It kept TiVo afraid of losing customers and forced them to make customer desires a priority.

    Now, there's no competition and anyone who is addicted to PVR functionality is basically stuck with TiVo. (MythTV not withstanding.) And TiVo now has little reason to fear the loss of customers, so they have less reason to actually improve the product.

    I love my TiVo, but this I think this is a bad thing.

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  27. Denon & Merantz is HIGHLY respected by cybrthng · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These companies have TOP NOTCH "consumer" digital equipment from receivers, dvd players to high end display devices.

    I personally think this is a *GOOD* thing as i can't wait to see what comes up and out of this!!

    1. Re:Denon & Merantz is HIGHLY respected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. If Denon or Marantz continues with ReplayTV, we should expect a much higher quality product than anything Sonicblue manufactured.

  28. LA Times analysis of DVR market by Krelnik · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The LA Times had an interesting article just Monday about the failure (so far) for DVRs to really take off in the consumer marketplace. Quote: "it must be said that the revolution is way behind schedule. Far from being an indispensable household appliance, the DVR remains a device of cliquish partiality."

    Read it here (free registration required, yadda, yadda):
    Mass Rollout of DVR Technology Stuck on 'Pause'

    1. Re:LA Times analysis of DVR market by TheOneEyedMan · · Score: 1

      Doesn't a lot of the benefit of owning a PVR come from everyone else no doing so? If / when everyone owns a PVR we'll see a lot more product placement and fewer commercials. Currently, PVR owners see a lot fewer ads and don't suffer through a lot of product placement either.

      --
      Reality is that which refuses to go away when I stop believing in it. --Phillip K. Dick (remove SPAM to email)
    2. Re:LA Times analysis of DVR market by randyest · · Score: 1

      you don't own a PVR, do you? Skipping commercials (either manually via Tivo, or automatically with ReplayTV) is a relatively minor part of the wonderfullness of PVR's. As cool as it is to avoid commercials, it's less than 1% of the overall appeal of PVR to me.

      Pause, rewind, auto-record, etc. are the real major advantages of PVR.

      And product placement is not an annoying interruption. Not too terrible, methinks.

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:LA Times analysis of DVR market by TheOneEyedMan · · Score: 1

      Indeed I do own one, it is my major reason for doing so

      --
      Reality is that which refuses to go away when I stop believing in it. --Phillip K. Dick (remove SPAM to email)
  29. Re:Rio sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Funny - I just got two Rio 600 MP3 players (32 Mb and 64Mb models) given to me in the last two days by two different people. They don't have enough memory to hold many songs, but they seem to do what they do well enough, and they're automatically recognized by iTunes.

  30. Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a Rio Riot and I feel that I was mercilessly ripped off. Buggy firmware, outstandingly poor support on _WINDOWS_, nonexistent on other OS's, and extremely weak driver updates.

    Goodbye, Sonicblue, you steaming pile of dung.

  31. Frontpath Progears by Mar1boroMan · · Score: 1

    So does this mean that the Sonicblue Frontpath Progears will get even cheaper, or that my current ones have just become collector's items. :)

  32. Why no subscription free PVR by fruey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If only you could get a PVR that just worked, and was programmable like a VCR, with Showview or some other listings, and could pause live TV?

    Ideally the box would compress MPEG-2 or 4, and allow you to interface it to a PC for archiving of old shows onto a SVCD or VCD format / MPEG-2 / DivX.

    Wait... what am I saying? Why not just buy a PC with an ATI All-in-wonder card?

    PVR will only work if there's enough take up. Sky, in the UK, as well as Canal+ in France, are setting up their next generation to go PVR, as *part* of the regular satellite subscription service. This will work. Sadly, the cable companies were not in on the deal with SonicBlue. If they had been, and could have charged $10 extra per month for it or something, and made a deal on hardware, then it would be workable. You cannot beat the giants, they will be right behind with their products.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by dameron · · Score: 1

      MythTv at www.mythtv.org does everything you require, and it's open source to boot. It has a very nice semi-transparent program guide that automatically downloads schedule information for your cable/sat system into a mysql database and lets you record shows, pause live tv, etc.

      -dameron

    2. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      If only you could get a PVR that just worked, and was programmable like a VCR, with Showview or some other listings, and could pause live TV?

      Sure. Are you willing to pay $500 for it? That's how much the hardware costs. Ooops... forgot. You're not spreading the software development costs out over a monthly subscription... up that to $750 then.

      and allow you to interface it to a PC for archiving of old shows

      Oh... up it to $1000. We're gonna get our pants sued off.

      Wait... what am I saying? Why not just buy a PC with an ATI All-in-wonder card?

      Because the interface sucks rocks. Actually, sucking rocks would be an improvement on the interface and recording quality.

      Frankly, the monthly fees aren't really for the guide data - yeah, some of the costs go to that and to the dialup/web servers to support the customer base, but the vast majority covers development costs and day-to-day operations. If you're willing to have a PVR that will never have a software update, never have new features, and has to rely on the amazingly crappy show data that is broadcast in sideband (ala VCRPlus+) then you could get a standalone PVR. But it's going to be around $500 to cover the hardware and development.

      Or I can sell you one for $400, then charge you ~$10/month or a largish lifetime fee, provide software updates, new features, oh, and better guide data. As business models go, I'll take the second one.

      You're right about the giants coming though -- most cable operators are looking to provide PVR style functionality soon. But wow are they crippled. Of course, it may not matter - the boxes are cheap (usually free) and the monthly fee just becomes another line item on a $100/mo cable bill. I keep hoping that TiVo, at least, will be able to fight a lot of these guys on a patent basis, but it seems unlikely.

    3. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can, Pioneer sells one.
      $899.95 with a 20 gig hard drive.

      you can buy it at Circuit city.

    4. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's stupid. I can build a Linux box with an All-In-Wonder card and a 40 GB hard drive for $600.

      You're stupid. Philips is stupid. Everyone is stupid except me.

    5. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      Wait... what am I saying? Why not just buy a PC with an ATI All-in-wonder card?

      Or the Hauppauge PVR-250/350 cards.

      The only downside is that the software is still somewhat immature.

      Having spent a *lot* of time on PC-based PVR project, and having tried a number of hardware/software options, I think the PC solution is only about 90% there.

      However, it's absolutely brilliant for creating archival copies of programs broadcast on TV.

      The PVR-250 in particular does an excellent job of capturing to MPEG-2 format (SVCD or DVD) in realtime and once you've edited out the ads you can fit a 1 hour program (or two half-hour ones) onto a single 700MB CDR in SVCD format.

      Movies are easily fitted onto two CDRs or a single DVD +-R/RW and the quality is excellent.

      Tapes suck for long-term storage -- some of the recordings I made on top-quality VHS tape just five or six years ago are alread showing signs of degrading. In theory, CDRs should last ten times that (normal storage caveats).

      Tapes are also a hugely inefficient use of space. By switching to CDR I can now fit more than four times the amount of material on the same shelf.

      Whether you intend to use your PC as a PVR or not, a decent capture card is a worthwhile investment these days.

      Hell, with the right capture card you can even get all the music and movies you want for free without downloading from the Net.

    6. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by sheldon · · Score: 1

      "If only you could get a PVR that just worked, and was programmable like a VCR, with Showview or some other listings, and could pause live TV? "

      It's called the RCA Scenium DRS7000N, a combination progressive scan DVD player with Hard-Disc Recorder.

      It has a 40 Gig harddrive, can record about 30 hours of television, pause live TV and can even store and playback MP3 and JPEG files.

      Cost is about $600.

      I considered it, and ultimately opted for building my own PC. 80 Gig drive, ATI All-In-Wonder 8500DV card... now the only problem is software. I've been involved with the Snapstream Quartz beta and it's looking pretty good. I have to download the latest beta to see what's improved.

      While I spent $600 on my PC solution, it's a bit more flexible even if it isn't as easy to use.

    7. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For software, you might want to check out MythTV. It needs MySQL and QT 3.1, but most distros (eg Redhat 8) have those.

    8. Re:Why no subscription free PVR by sheldon · · Score: 1

      My time is worth something to me.

  33. That's why slashdot is losing money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of those departments. All of that overhead to keep them all in operation. I bet they don't even know how many departments they have. That has got to be an accounting nightmare!

  34. It's a damn shame, but I can't say I'm surprised by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative
    I recently bought at Rio Sport 35S. I loved the idea of 128 megs (upgradable to 256) with no moving parts, but the sad fact is it's rather poorly engineered. I'm not sure if it's the cold, or static electricity, or what, but I can't walk around outside wearing it without it suffering a hard reset every 5 minutes or so. I've also gotten some bizarre bursts of static electricity (the first time it happened, I was walking out of an airport, past the metal detectors, so I thought that might have something to do with it, but it's happened twice since with no obvious reason).

    Oh well, others are making good competitive products, so I guess there's no reason really to be sad to see them go.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  35. Office is the Bermuda Triangle of Santa Clara by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2, Funny

    Former resident: Exodus!

    1. Re:Office is the Bermuda Triangle of Santa Clara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have made more money selling parking to AMC customers.

  36. Damn... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... I haven't sent my rebate form in.

  37. Oh no! by Geekenstein · · Score: 1

    Now only the evil TiVo will have a product, and its a monopoly! Monopolies are evil!

    Oh, wait. We like TiVo, don't we?

    Yay TiVo!

    1. Re:Oh no! by Mr.Phil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did TiVo force SonicBlue out of business? Did TiVo engage in anti-competitive practices to drive SonicBlue to bankrupcy? On both counts, No.

      TiVo is not preventing anyone from selling a PVR device. Too bad that there was such a high saturation in the nitch market of PVRs that SonicBlue couldn't stay profitable.

  38. The problem with Replay by Daimaou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have one friend that has a ReplayTV machine and another who has a Tivo, so I have looked at both of them. Personally, I like the Tivo better.

    The problem with both of them for me is that they are bundled with a service that you are charged monthly for. I'll admit the service is a good one, but I think people for the most part don't like the idea of paying each month for something they can do manually with a VCR. Tivo and Replay have some nice features, but after all, recording a show is still the primary function and most people don't want to pay for that.

    If Tivo and Replay would operate just like a VCR and allow you to use their service if you want to, or just use the system as a regular VCR if you didn't want to pay the monthly fees, then I think both systems would probably catch on a lot more than they have.

    1. Re:The problem with Replay by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      I'll admit the service is a good one, but I think people for the most part don't like the idea of paying each month for something they can do manually with a VCR.

      I thought that the idea of a PVR was that you didn't need to do something manually.

      If Tivo and Replay would operate just like a VCR and allow you to use their service if you want to, or just use the system as a regular VCR if you didn't want to pay the monthly fees

      If someone wants a VCR, why wouldn't they by a VCR? It astounds me that someone would buy a PVR if all they were interested in was a VCR.

      I guess they might be interested in the capability to record to a non-removable media, but it doesn't seem like that big of advantage to me. It's got limited storage, and you can't take a program you've recorded to a different set, or bring it to a friends.

      -Brent
    2. Re:The problem with Replay by mccalli · · Score: 3, Informative
      If Tivo and Replay would operate just like a VCR and allow you to use their service if you want to, or just use the system as a regular VCR if you didn't want to pay the monthly fees, then I think both systems would probably catch on a lot more than they have.

      Certainly Tivo already does this - don't know about Replay as I've never seen or used one. Tivo will allow you to manually set time and channel and record however.

      The thing is, there's no value in that to me. The whole value of Tivo is in the data it provides, not the hardware and not even the software (although I like the interface). Without the data, nicely categorised with descriptions etc., the Tivo isn't much better than a VCR to me. With the data however, it has proved a god-send.

      That's the real service - the provision of accurate and categorised data. That's why you pay your subscription.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:The problem with Replay by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      That's the real service - the provision of accurate and categorised data. That's why you pay your subscription.

      Is it really worth it though? I pay £5/year for my digiguide subscription, which gives me program listings for all the channels I have 2 weeks in advance and detailed descriptions of them. I'm happy paying £5/year for this data, I would not be happy to pay £120/year for exactly the same data on a TiVo. Now if I could get a £200 machine that would record MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 in real-time and control my cable decoder box and only cost £5-10 a year to run I would buy one today. I don't want to have to pay almost half the cost of the box every year to keep running it, and I don't want to buy a lifelong subscription from a company that may not survive the year.

      I have no idea if ReplayTV or TiVo can change cable channel. Their adverts seem targeted at terrestrial TV users. The cable box has an RS-232 port, so I assume it's possible...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:The problem with Replay by NitzerX · · Score: 1

      The subscription fee is the death for Replay and will be the death of TiVo if they don't change their business model.

      I am not going to pay $10 / month for a glorified TV Guide. I could care less about the other crap that comes with the service. I've been quite pleased with my series 1 TiVo without the service.

    5. Re:The problem with Replay by oscarm · · Score: 1

      Didn't see anyone else make this point yet but you *can* get a Tivo with a lifetime subscription for $300 bucks now. Sure you have to spend more money on top of the hardware but then you don't get to complain about the monthly charge.

    6. Re:The problem with Replay by Mochatsubo · · Score: 1
      If someone wants a VCR, why wouldn't they by a VCR? It astounds me that someone would buy a PVR if all they were interested in was a VCR.
      Is it really that hard to understand?

      1. Capacity. Compare 120 GB vs. 2 hour VCR tape.

      2. Quality. Compare best recording quality to HDD vs. VCR tape.

      3. Programming Flexibility. Record daily/weekly over same program space, so instead of getting n copies you record over the same show slot.

      4. Time shifting.

      -mim

    7. Re:The problem with Replay by supercargo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The subscription service may be the death of Tivo, but the service itself is worth every penny. I paid the lifetime $250 at the time I got my Series 1, so my average monthly charge keeps getting less ($10 and counting). For the 2 weeks I was sans hard line telephone and hadn't gotten the TivoNet card installed, going back manual programming was a nightmare I don't care to repeat.

      It was easily as awful as watching TV at Tivo-less friend's house.

      --
      -- "He is a being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten mackerel by moonlight, stinks as it shines." -
    8. Re:The problem with Replay by Carpathius · · Score: 1

      ReplayTV, and, I'm sure, Tivo, can control your cable box. In fact, mines controls not just my cable box, but also a satellite receiver and I could hook in an external antenna as well.

      I don't pay a cent, but then I've had mine for quite a while. If my ReplayTV stops getting schedule information, I'll either be building a new computer to take over the ReplayTV duties or buying a Tivo.

      Sean.

    9. Re:The problem with Replay by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
      I have a Tivo. I do not pay a monthly fee.

      They have a lifetime subscription option ($250 now?). Consider that amount part of the price of the box and ask yourself if the combined price is reasonable.

      If so, buy it and never pay a monthly fee.
      If not, let it go and quit whining about the service change.

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

    10. Re:The problem with Replay by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Now if I could get a £200 machine that would record MPEG-2 or MPEG-4 in real-time and control my cable decoder box and only cost £5-10 a year to run I would buy one today.

      UK-based then, like me? £200 you can't do, but £300 is an option for that at the moment. Tivo UK is selling off its hardware for £99, and a lifetime's subscription costs £200 - no more subscription to pay. The guide information will keep coming regardless of Tivo - it's the same guide information that Sky use for their Sky+ box I think, and that's going to survive.

      If you can find a box, that might be a good option for you right now. And Tivo can control cable-decoders - it doe fine with my NTL/Pace box.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    11. Re:The problem with Replay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not just the monthly fee, the need for downloading stuff, etc. The main thing is the lack of capability of tossing a bought or rented DVD in one slot, a blank DVD in another, and recording from one to the other. My VCR can do that easily -- in two hours or less I have a reasonably clear backup tape for time-shifting or archiving purposes. I'm never going to buy any kind of device which has FEWER features than my VCR. What kind of "progress" is that?

  39. PC not in the livingroom yet by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People still want a black box that's one stereo rack unit, like the DVD/VCR/CD player/et al, and a user interface easily compatible with a remote control.

    The PC based solutions are nowhere near that level of functionality yet.

  40. Re:Poor Sonic :-( ... 5 gB of WMAs... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "That said, I could not buy one of their players because they would not support WMA files. Over 5gb of my collection is in that format."

    Well, if any good comes from this, atleast I'm sure you're making Daddy Gates happy by encoding in and refusing to switch from his platform-proprietary format.

    *Sigh*

  41. Your own damn fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was really stupid to put your music collection into the WMA format because it's not a standard like MP3 is. It's only supported by Windows. Sure there is good support for WMA across hardware music devices but there is better support for MP3!

    It would have been like replacing all your records with 8-track tapes! WMA will be like 8-track tapes, it will just be a fad that will fade away when something better comes along.

    Besides, if you stick with WMA you may become shocked if and when DRM starts to restrict what you can do with your own digital copies of your own CD's that you already paid for!

    1. Re:Your own damn fault... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AC:
      It would have been like replacing all your records with 8-track tapes!
      WMA will be like 8-track tapes, it will just be a fad . . .
      How true. Kind of like Ogg.
  42. Re:It's a damn shame, but I can't say I'm surprise by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    Weird. I bought mine yesterday and walked four miles wearing it last night. Not a bit of trouble. My only desire is to get some headphones that will reproduce bass better.

    I would guess your problem is static. That is not an issue here in South Florida because it is like 80 deg. and 115% humidity.

  43. but will they open the hardware specs? by ksheff · · Score: 1

    I have a Rio Volt 250 which is perfect for long trips. It's probably the main reason why I haven't converted my CDs into ogg format: it only plays mp3 or wma files. Since the firmware can be upgraded, it would be nice if they opened the specs so hardware like this can be adapted for other file formats. I'm sure the ReplayTV users wouldn't mind being able to switch over to a Tivo subscription and keep the same hardware.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  44. TiVo is doing fine... by Wee · · Score: 5, Informative
    They beat analysts' expectations, revenue is up more than they thought ($60.2 million this year vs. $19.4 million last year), licensing means they'll sign up more people than they thought this year. They didn't meet their growth projections for the holidays only because stores didn't have enough product to sell. That isn't necessarily a "bad" kind of problem. More info on news.com.com.com.com.com.

    Doesn't look to me like TiVo needs a savior.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:TiVo is doing fine... by SuuSt · · Score: 1

      "They beat analysts' expectations"

      Yeah, analysts expected them to loose a hell of allot of money, and instead they just lost allot of money. Just because you beat expectations doesn't mean your doing well.

  45. OT: A Moderation Lesson by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    If it's the first time the idea is expressed in a story, it's not redundant, and I meta-moderate accordingly. [BTW, I don't consider "the way the hard-drive based Sonic players connected to your PC without the need for special drivers" (or any other part of the post) to be a "widely held notion," so even if I agreed with your position on 'redundant' this post doesn't qualify.]

    Prime example: "First Post" posts are, by your terms, redundant, but that's poor moderation; "First Post" posts are offtopic, not redundant, even though the effect is the same (-1).

    They're not trolls or flamebait, either. A troll is a post that is fishing (trolling) for replies, and has nothing to do with creatures who live under bridges. Flamebait is a subset of troll: it's posting a deliberately extreme statement, baiting hotheads to respond with flames. A "First Post" is neither, but I metamoderat such moderation as "fair" even though it's inaccurate.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:OT: A Moderation Lesson by nomadic · · Score: 1

      A post can be redundant if it simply restates something in the story without adding any information or interpretation.

      For example, if someone had posted a reply to this story saying simply "wow, what do you know, sonicblue is going out of business" that could justifiably labelled redundant.

      Personally I think people take the moderation system way too seriously. There should be 3 moderations in my opinion; interesting, funny, and troll. Don't really need anything else.

    2. Re:OT: A Moderation Lesson by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you say. Which, I suppose, makes this post redundant.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  46. What will happen to ReplayTV service? by Takeel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, what will this mean for those of us who get ReplayTV guide service from SonicBlue? Will we find our service vanish suddenly soon and our money sucked into the blackhole of SonicBlue's chapter 11, or will the buying company continue the service transparently for current subscribers?

  47. Uh Oh by arvindn · · Score: 2, Funny

    So it's the Blue Screen of Death for all the ReplayTV's out there?

  48. Yeah, I have an S35S also by Chazmati · · Score: 1

    I've got an S35S too. Haven't had those static bursts you describe, and it's only done a hard reset once (which wiped out its memory). And while it has one of the nicest displays (IMHO) there are some serious shortcomings:

    Can't upload from the unit. Must be an anti-sharing 'feature'. Deters illegal file sharing, but impinges on fair/legal use as well.

    The non-standard USB cable and proprietary software are an inconvenience. If I'm on the road and want to download some mp3's from a friends collection, I would have to bring my special Rio USB cable and CDROM with their music manager software. I wish you could just plug the thing in with a standard USB cable and read/write files like a 'thumb drive'.

    The 1.80 fireware revision sounded like a good deal, but the thing takes about 5 extra seconds to 'boot up' when you switch on the power. Bummer.

    Plus, the mp3 decoding doesn't really sound that good. I have a ton of "professionally encoded" eMusic mp3's and they sound much worse on the S35S than on WinAMP or XMMS.

    I wonder if I could claim that as a defect in workmanship under the 90-day warranty and exchange this for a solvent company's player?

    1. Re:Yeah, I have an S35S also by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Happily, my hard resets have not wiped out any songs, it just resets my place in the playlist, volume settings, stuff like that.

      Yeah, the non-uploading and proprietary software is too bad, but since I mainly just use one computer, it hasn't really been an issue for me. Besides, with and upgrade to 256 megs, I can go for days without needing new tracks.

      One thing that would be REALLY nice though, would be a better fast forward. The ability to seek forward, say, a minute at a time would be tremendously useful. Another feature they really should have added was a "hold" switch, to prevent accidental button pushing when the thing's in your pocket.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Yeah, I have an S35S also by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      Y'know, the box said it was upgradable to 256 MB but the website says it will take up to 640 MB. I just ordered another 256 for $99, which would make it 384.

    3. Re:Yeah, I have an S35S also by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      Agreed on the FF feature.

      I thought the same about the hold function, but I just found a hold function in the menu. Not sure if this was added in the 1.80 firmware or not. It's a little awkward to activate (Menu, scroll-scroll-scroll, enter, etc.)

    4. Re:Yeah, I have an S35S also by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Why thank you, yes, it was part of the firmware upgrade, so now I have hold too. I'll report back (if slashdot will still let me post to this article) if it seems to help with the hard resets too.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    5. Re:Yeah, I have an S35S also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize this is not a support board for RIO. But......The hold feature has been availiable since the 1.60 firmware (It just was not availiable in the menu). You just needed to press and hold the menu button while pressing enter to turn hold on and off. You can enter hold either way in 1.80.

      "So let me get this straight, they are little blue men with tails and no shirts living in mushroom houses with one woman" -- Phil daily after just learning of the Smurfs.

  49. What about Panasonic's responsibility? by mrnick · · Score: 1

    On the box it states:

    "Please note: There is no monthly fee for the Channel Guide service. Local access numbers are available in most areas: however, telephone charges may apply in certain areas. If you have a question, please call the Panasonic Call Center at 1-888-843-9788 or email consumerproducts@panasonic.com"

    To me that clearly indicates Panasonic's responsibility to provide the GUIDE? I called the number and they stated that zap2it.com was responsible for the guide data. Sounds like passing the buck to me!

    Nick Powers

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
  50. Good riddance! by zerofoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having owned 3 SonicBlue products (RioCAR, RIO digital audio reciever, and a portable RIO player) i'm glad they're gone. I bought these products because they were cutting edge devices that, at the time, no one else had. Sadly, all of these items ,at release, had limited software support....and six months later had none.

    A company must support its products for longer than six months if it's going to survive. Sure, most of these products have 3rd party support now, but to expect that at the corporate level seems like passing the buck.

    -ted

    1. Re:Good riddance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Having owned 3 SonicBlue products (RioCAR, RIO digital audio reciever, and a portable RIO player) i'm glad they're gone.... Sadly, all of these items ,at release, had limited software support....and six months later had none.

      Mod: -5 Bullshit. The Honourable Gentlemen needs to check his facts.



      The RioCar/empeg has excellent software support. They are still periodically releasing enhanced software, despite the player being discontinued over a year ago. Current released version is 2.0beta13, 2.0final is expected within weeks, and rumors are abound of a 3.0alpha release soon afterwards.


      In addition, sine the RioCar/empeg is linux based, third party software support has been rampant. A well known Linux developer along with a few minor contributors maintain a kernel that adds significant functionality to the stock kernel, and allows third party applications to be written.


      At this point in time, there exists applications that;

      • Can utilise GPS receivers to provide location information and follow a route.
      • Can read SYLT ID3v2 tags and display synchonised lyrics.
      • Can let you play Pacman.
      • Can let you play Tetris.
      • Can let you read arbitrary text files.
      • Can let you play a trivia game.


      This list is non-exhaustive.
    2. Re:Good riddance! by zerofoo · · Score: 1

      You missed the point.

      I never claimed there was NO support available for these products. Just crappy support.

      Your "software updates" are all labled "beta" and "alpha". That's crap. I want stable, tested, and supported software. I am a paying consumer not a guinea pig. I do not feel that I should be responsible for testing a vendor's apps.

      My claim is that Sonic Blue did not adequately support these products and relied on 3rd party people to do the work they should have been doing all along.

      -ted

  51. Chia hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears the same thing happened to Chia hair. I was only starting to lose my hair when I saw the commercial one late Saturday night some years back. Now that I'm completely bald, I was hoping they switched from green to brown or black and it had caught on as a common treatment.

  52. Re:TiVo's savior: Sony.(pirate killer) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Expect, if that happens, Sony will replace the hard drive in the Tivos with memory sticks.

    And they'll have to sue themselves for producing a product that is only used by dirty, thieving, pirates.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  53. Anyone know how this affects the S3-Via alliance?? by gwappo · · Score: 1
    Some may recall that S3 changed its name and strategy after newly hired CEO Ken Potashner came on board, who decided to dump S3's graphics into an alliance with Via, and make the recently acquired Diamond Multimedia the core business.

    Now the Diamond part seems to have crapped out badly, does anyone know what is going to happen to the alliance?

    (Some others will recall Potashner recently got kicked out of the company due to problems with enron-isms in his board. He was more of a ".com era" ceo I suppose).

  54. Manual recording by Beebos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Replay users will stil be able to set up their recordings manually.

    You can use the Replay, at least the 4000 series, as an advanced VCR. You can manually tell your Replay to record channel 5 at 12pm everyday or just on Thursdays. It's slightly kludgy to name the recordings, but not difficult.

    1. Re:Manual recording by CaptCosmic · · Score: 1

      Not really. Once your monthly activation expires, the Replay will refuse to aloow you to do anything. No watching TV, no recording programs. All you can do is access the settings menu.

      I know. I bought my ReplayTV as an open box, and someone had already used the free trial period. I could do nothing with it until I contacted SonicBlue and started my subscription.

      So, even though you have one of the new 4000 series Replays, don't expect it to continue working if the service stops.

      --
      -> Capt Cosmic <-
    2. Re:Manual recording by Beebos · · Score: 1

      What about those of us who paid for the lifetime activation?

    3. Re:Manual recording by wmol · · Score: 0

      lifetime activations are the exception to this. if you paid lifetime, the manual record option will not disable itself. but without the guide data, you will have to look up the shows on tvguide.com and program the unit like a vcr.

  55. marantz is owned by phillips by insanely_mad · · Score: 1

    not d&m

    1. Re:marantz is owned by phillips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.dm-holdings.com/en/message.html

    2. Re:marantz is owned by phillips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marantz is the M in D&M. Yes, Philips used to own 49% of Marantz but about a year ago Denon (the D in D&M) and Marantz merged to form D&M.

  56. Bummer by saddino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another product/service of mine bites the dust; I really hope someone keeps the service up.

    Oh well, being an early adopter sucks sometimes.

    Now, will someone finally go and buy up Kozmo's IP and get that idea going again? I need a DVD, some bagels and a bottle of milk. Thanks.

  57. this is so sad. by sirshannon · · Score: 1

    I just decided to buy this a few hours ago, and now I hear they're selling that branch.

    Say it ain't so!!!

  58. rio800 by BeefyOne · · Score: 1

    Too bad, I guess. They lost my attention after three bad rio800 units in a row. Service sucked. See yah Sonicblue and don't bother writing.

    --
    /* No Comment
  59. Re: Why would you want a PVR without service by ip_vjl · · Score: 2, Informative

    If someone wants a VCR, why wouldn't they by a VCR? It astounds me that someone would buy a PVR if all they were interested in was a VCR.

    I can answer that, as I've wanted one, but have no interest in the "we'll find what you like" service.

    1) Pause live TV.

    By the time we get our daugher to bed, it is almost always 8:15 - 8:20. If I tape the show, I then do something else for 40 minutes, as I don't want to watch the end of the show without seeing the beginning. With a PVR, I could start it at 8:20 and be caught up with live tv by 9:00

    2) Random access to shows on tape.

    I record mostly to timeshift. I don't need to archive. I'm not horribly worried about quality (as long as it's viewable). So when I tape, I tend to re-use a few tapes over and over until they wear out. If I tape something, but don't get to it right away I may need to tape something else. I'll either put it on the same tape (after the first show) or get a new tape. Now I either have multiple tapes laying around, or I end up watching my shows in "reverse order" so that I can re-use the tape if need be without writing over unwatched programs.

    With a PVR I could put stuff in and watch it when I want to watch it.

    --

    I'd still like one, but they're just expensive, and I have no interest in paying a monthly fee. Until last month, I was only paying for very basic cable. I don't need a service to automatically look at all the programming when I only have 5 channels of anything worthwhile to worry about.

  60. remembering S3... by yanyan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember when i bought my first ever 3D accelerator, an S3 Savage3D. It was faster than any other card i'd ever used up until then (but then again, it WAS my first 3d card), and i remember Quake 2 running sooo smoothly in all its hardware-rendered glory.

    Over the next few months i started looking around for tweaks that i could perform on the card. I ended up using one program (whose name escapes my memory) that allows you set normally hidden values in the registry to change the Savage3D's core and memory clock speeds, sidebanding, etc. Needless to say i got hooked again on my Savage. Being a regular visitor to S3's website back then, i learned of their next generation chip coming out, the Savage2000, and i thought, this is going to be one helluva chip when it comes out.

    Still i wasn't content with the speed i was getting out of my card, and i was still into reading hardware reviews and stuff. I wrote an email to the creator of the hack program i was using, asking him about other tweaks that he knew of. Sadly, he told me that the Savage3D had a hardware flaw right from the start, a very deep-seated bug that essentially crippled the chip, and all future generations of it, starting with the Savage4, and, i realized moments later, the Savage2000 which i had looked forward to. The programmer told me a few details of the flaw, which i can't recall right now, but basically it was a flaw that reduced the (advertised) triangle rate. For example, the Savage3d was touted to be capable of doing 5 million polys/second, but the flaw caused it to do only a quarter of that figure, around 1.25 million polys/sec. In short, a very serious flaw.

    It was only a matter of time before the actual Savage2000 chip came out, and floundered miserably against competition from Nvidia, the Geforce 256. Thus began my fascination with Nvidia, and soon after i got my first ever card based on an Nvidia chip.

    I think S3 would have been a great graphics chip company if they got the hardware designs down right from the start. Previously, i would insist on using only S3 cards like the Trio32 and the Virge. IMHO they were great cards.

  61. Rio500 by yamla · · Score: 3, Informative

    I cannot speak for the ReplayTV but the Rio500 didn't hold up anywhere near as well as I had hoped. If I shake my Rio500 a little, it loses an internal connection and reboots. Furthermore, the customer service for the Rio500 is god-awful. I went looking for drivers one day after I reformatted my machine. That day, they had 'temporarily disabled' access to the drivers, not even posting the old ones on their site. They didn't correct this for almost a week, during which my Rio was useless.

    Also, there was always a hassle getting the Rio Audio Manager (the _worst_ designed user-interface for managing large collections of MP3s I have ever seen) to reenable the MP3-ripping functionality I should have had. In the end, I went out and bought a copy of another piece of software to rip MP3s and to transfer to the Rio (I forget its name at the moment, it's the popular Windows one).

    Still, I suppose I still use my Rio500. I use it to listen to audible.com audio content and it does a great job of that. For my MP3s, though, I have since upgraded to the Creative Nomad Jukebox 3. I cannot get it to hook up to Linux yet but apart from that, it is great.

    --

    Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    1. Re:Rio500 by JamieF · · Score: 1

      > If I shake my Rio500 a little, it loses an internal connection and reboots.

      Mine does that too sometimes. It's because of the battery shifting around. If you bend the negative battery contact out a bit (so it pushes harder against the negative terminal of the battery) the problem is greatly reduced. Still, if you slap the unit hard enough, the weight of the battery against that contact is enough that is pushes it down, and the positive terminal of the battery loses contact with the positive contact of the Rio. If this is really a problem you could probably wire something up, such as a spring on the positive terminal side, or a much stronger spring on the negative terminal side, so that this never happens. Based on the other ultra-small MP3 players that I've seen, I like the Rio 500 better.

      As for Rio Audio Manager, I agree, it fairly well sucks. I use a Mac with my Rio 500, and for Mac OS 9, the copy of SoundJam MP that came with the Rio worked well for me. Under Mac OS X, iTunes supports the Rio 500 out of the box (rumor has it that iTunes is just a SoundJam derivative) and works well.

      My only gripe with the Rio 500 is that I wish that songs copied to it faster.

  62. I guess I'm not really surprised. by zackbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They didn't really target the audience right.

    The product cost too much, wasn't easily upgradable, and required a service contract (built into the price) to get the guide even if you didn't want the guide.

    Offer me a freakin' digital recorder without a guide, don't push me to buy a service, and don't charge me an arm and a leg, and I'd jump at it.

    That's the problem with tivo too. You don't *have* to get the service, but it keeps prompting you to. Even more annoying, you have to buy the service for EACH UNIT. If you have two or more units in your house, they can't share one guide. Yes, you get a discount on service for additional units, but you're already paying for it on the first unit. In fact, I think the discount only applies if you get the dish units anyway.

    True, each unit requires a phone call. But the units could be networked to share the one guide. Since tivo stopped offering toll free calls for the guide, it's even worse.

    I don't want to have to keep buying blades after I've bought the razor, to steal a phrase. That's why I bought an electric razor.

  63. good riddance to Replay... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    The company buying Replay will simply cancel the product and try to make money off leveraging its intellectual property. Any company wanting to continue to annoy the MPAA and broadcasters with its sharing of recording programs to other members via the net without the permission of the broadcasters is simply repeating the legal mistake of the website in Canada that simulcast the American broadcast networks without their permission... The ReplayTV is toast and all of you people that bought it over Tivo should've known better that SonicBlue couldn't afford the lawsuits. As for people worried Tivo won't have competition; Tivo will still have to worry about Microsoft jumping back in the field. That should keep them on their toes...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  64. Re:american propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will you do if the new "democracy" elects an islamic extremist in Iraq?

    Take 'em out, of course.

  65. Greg Ballard of 3dfx and Sonic Blue is to blame... by havaloc · · Score: 1

    Greg Ballard as far as I know, is/was CEO of both 3dfx and SonicBlue. See the connection? Sonicblue is going to go the way of 3dfx.

  66. Not Likely by jmt9581 · · Score: 1

    Sure it would benefit the customers, but SonicBlue has an obligation to their shareholders to attempt to make some amount of money off their assets.

    Replay will most likely be sold off to D&M like the rest of the company.

    --

    My blog

    1. Re:Not Likely by RembrandtX · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually
      they opened up the RioReciever to projects like jreceiver.sourceforge.net.

      so they have a history of helping out folks with 'defunct' products on that level.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  67. Yeah...Trio and ViRGE had crisp 2D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To my understanding of the past articles, the S3's always had 2D graphics engines that outperformed the Matrox and ATI, but sadly so many complex rendering and filtering engines were produced and Matrox simply had better post-filters and ATI had shitty post filters. ATI is the company that bothers alot, from their past Mach32 products. The Mach64-based products were a huge improvment in the 2D image quality, but they still had typical/stupid bugs that hindered. S3 has always been fast and stable and 100% compliant with that ol' IBM VGA.

    You can put a S3 into any computer, but ATI's latest is *cough* strange, and Matrox is smoking crack on their graphics engine; Matrox just sux now-days, and nothing was better than Matrox's G200 PCI.

  68. TimeWarners going to kill Tivo and Replay too by lkaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here in Austin TimeWarner is trying out a PVR with 80GB of disk space and just about all the features of Tivo (a little dumber and doesn't have commerical skip). It's the same deal as the cable box--you only pay $9.95 a month to lease the hardware.

    There is no way that Tivo can compete with that. Even though it has a better product the cable company just has it beat here from a price and marketing perspective. It's almost sad...

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
    1. Re:TimeWarners going to kill Tivo and Replay too by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Tivo can easly compete with that by including commerical skip. I don't care how cheap a system is, if you cannot easily skip commericals it's worthless.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:TimeWarners going to kill Tivo and Replay too by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Let me see here, I can buy a Tivo and pay for it once, or I can rent an inferior service and pay every month forever?

      It seems like the Tivo is a much better deal.

      And yes, I know Tivo has some sort of subscription service for the show listings, but most of the features work with out it, don't they? The pausing live TV is the feature I would use most, if I had one, anyway.

    3. Re:TimeWarners going to kill Tivo and Replay too by devaudio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This service has to be the worst I have seen PVR wise as well... it has bugs where "season pass" of certain shows disappears after the guide data expires for the week, or it just randomly deletes scheduled recordings out. I have both the Tivo and the TW PVR, and the difference is like having a Luxury Sports Sedan (tivo) and a Skateboard with 3 wheels (Time Warner). If you come in to the middle of a recording (like coming home at 6:15 and trying to watch the 6pm simpsons) you can not say "skip back to the begining" -- you must rewind at 4 X all the way back. The time warner service will NEVER skip commercials tho -- AOL Time Warner and a bunch of other media companies don't like the fact that you can do it now with ReplayTV (and they pretend not to know tivos can be hacked to do it)

  69. ReplayTV has been here before by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1

    ...when it sold itself off to Sonic Blue, and they're still providing service, as they will probably continue to do under new owners.

  70. Well, shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got a Replay last month, and I love the thing. Crap. At least I didn't shell out the $250 'lifetime' fee...

  71. The people who brought you betamax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony is the king of adopting proprietary formats that no one else uses. Memory Sticks, BETAMAX, and assorted others.....

  72. Re:Poor Sonic :-( ... 5 gB of WMAs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up and get back to re-encoding all your CDs with Ogg Vorbis.

    Ogg Vorbis - Because we want you to.

  73. That's too bad... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    I really love my RioVolt SP250. The 8 minutes of memory made it utterly skip proof. I use it while jogging, mowing the lawn, anything. I was really hoping that SonicBlue would create one that used DVD disks. Having 4.7 gigs of MP3s would be (near) perfect.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  74. The latest Archos products require no drivers by lscotte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The latest Archos jukebox products (recorder, FM recorder) work with no special drivers - they are USB storage compliant and work great with usb-storage under Linux.

    Even the older jukebox will work under Linux, you just have to add a readily available driver.

    The nice thing about having a USB storage compliant device is when you plug it in, it just becomes a drive on your system. You can copy anything to or from it as if it was a local HD (it's just alot slower). Nice not having to use any proprietary software or DRM crap.

    Then, put Rockbox, the open source firmware for the Archos on it, and it makes for a very nice solution. On the go, it's a portable MP3 player; plugged into your system, you just play your MP3's with xmms right off the device. Good stuff!

    s/Linux/other_OS/ and s/xmms/other_player/ as appropriate.

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  75. No Competition? by telstar · · Score: 1
    "Now, there's no competition and anyone who is addicted to PVR functionality is basically stuck with TiVo."
    • You're way off on your thoughts that there's no competition. Not only are many cable companies starting to integrate PVR capabilities into their cable-boxes, companies like Microsoft and Sony are likely to integrate PVR functionality into their next-generation video game consoles. I'm a TiVo owner ... and while I agree that it'd be better to have a pure PVR manufacturer in the market ... I think TiVo is in for its biggest challenge when some of these newcomers hit the market.

  76. Empeg is such a great product by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    Just want to thank the original Empeg team once again. Hope they are doing well. Empeg is #2 device all time IMO, next to TiVo.

    1. Re:Empeg is such a great product by Brandis · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I am still loving the hell out of my Empeg ever time I get into my car.

  77. Just like 3dfx by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those too young to remember, sonic blue used to be Diamond Multimedia. Some of the best graphics cards around with the Diamond Stealth line, my first performance card after I got off the triton. Long before the Monster line of products.

    This was a failure from the very start. its very reminiscent of the 3dfx take over. For me, this was CEOs of a dying company buying another company so they could live another day. The company that bought diamond was already failing and they bought themselves probably 4-5 years with the purchase. Im sure it was devastating to share holders. Diamond was a SOLID company before the purchase.

    Diamond was the #1 seller of video cards and they did not make their own chips. Sad.

    Just like 3dfx was bought out by CEOs who also sought to extend their CEO life at the expence of the end users and shareholders.

    Just plain ugly.

    1. Re:Just like 3dfx by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Diamond still wouldn't have lasted for too long even if they weren't bought by S3. From the GeForce era on, Taiwanese and other foreign companies started to dominate the video card market with lower prices, and drivers became the property of the chipset maker. This meant that really, the only business in selling video cards is the razor-thin profits between the manufacturing costs and sale price, and if you're lucky, you'll get people to pay extra for better features; your card was otherwise the same as the other guy's.

      The sound card market didn't do any better, as Creative basically sealed the market with their bankruptcy of Aureal, which there was nothing Diamond could have done to prevent. Since Creative doesn't do licensing, this would leave their sound chip choice to only the smaller third parties, which outside of the hardcore geek community, haven't managed to make it in to many computers(to this day, people still curse about Creative cards, but they still work better than others most of the time). The Monster Sound MX400 was a flop anyhow, so it's unlikely Diamond would have produced another sound card.

      The modem market dried up with the introduction of broadband, and Diamond was in no position to get in to networking, as little Linksys was doing this quite well. The optical drive market was also overrun with OEM drives from cut-throat companies on the low end(I/O Magic, Cendyne0, and then companies like Asus and Pioneer on the high end. Diamond's optical drive business never did well in the first place anyhow, as Creative and their DXR cards ruled that roost.

      The Rio business really was the only viable business Diamond had at the time of purchase. Coming off their win in court with the RIAA, they were selling Rios right and left, and their Nike contract was very lucrative. However, between the commoditization of the MP3 player market, and their own bungling of the Rio line(there were some quality issues that Diamond would have had with or without S3), even that went down the tubes. Unless Diamond would have invented the iPod first, they most likely would have still been in the same situation.

      In the end, Diamond's days were numbered anyhow, they just didn't know it. Without a core business like Creative, it would only be a matter of time until the market ate them alive on their own. S3 only sped this up a bit.
      The sound card market didn't do any better, as Creative basically sealed the market with their bankruptcy of Aureal, which there was nothing Diamond could have done to prevent. Since Creative doesn't do licencing, this would leave their sound chip choice to only the smaller third parties, which outside of the hardcore geek community, haven't managed to make it in to many computers(to this day, people still curse about Creative cards, but they still work better than others most of the time). The Monster Sound MX400 was a flop anyhow, so it's unlikely Diamond would have produced another sound card.

      The modem market dried up with the introduction of broadband, and Diamond was in no position to get in to networking, as little Linksys was doing this quite well. The optical drive market was also overrun with OEM drives from cut-throat companies on the low end(I/O Magic, Cendyne0, and then companies like Asus and Pioneer on the high end. Diamond's optical drive buisness never did well in the first place anyhow, as Creative and their DXR cards ruled that roost.

      The Rio buisness really was the only viable buisness Diamond had at the time of purchase. Comming off their win in court with the RIAA, they were selling Rios right and left, and their Nike contract was very lucrative. However, between the commoditization of the MP3 player market, and their own bungling of the Rio line(there were some quality issues that Diamond would have had with or without S3), even that went down the tubes. Unless Diamond would have invented the iPod first, they most likely would have still been in the same situation.

      In the end, Diamond's days were numbered anyhow, they just didn't know it. Without a core buisness like Creative, it would only be a matter of time until the market ate them alive on their own. S3 only sped this up a bit.

    2. Re:Just like 3dfx by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      S3 only sped it up? And how...

      s3 made Diamond stop selling their NVIDIA based cards. s3 made diamond quit their #1 seller. At the time Diamond was NVIDIAs #1 customer.

      Anyway you slice it, s3 did wrong by diamond. Perhaps they were doomed anyway, but indeed s3 but grease on the skids.

  78. No! No! No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SonicBlue and 3Dfx have somthing else in common...they invented stuff on PC Boards.

    We need to invent somthing...like...stuff on air...yeah air boards. FILE CHAPTER 11, Piss on the creditors equally, propogandize our vallue with stock market schills, sell sell sell all our shit!

    -Gerg Brallad

  79. The real story - dvd recorder w/hd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real competition is coming....

    A basic dvd recorder/dvd player costs just
    under $400.00 now. If that drops $100.00 over the next two years, a Tivo/Replay is not feasable.

    Here are some of the alternatives:

    These are DVD recorders with or without hard disks:

    Panasonic DMR-E30 DVD Video Recorder no hard disk $375.00
    http://techbargains.pricegrabber.com/sear ch_getpro d.php/masterid=602985/search=recorder/ut=c6cfdfee8 9ddea4c

    Panasonic DMRE30K DVD Recorder no hard disk $499.99
    http://www.tweeter.com/product/index.jsp? productId =1181600&cp=1124286.1124353

    Panasonic DMR-HS2 - DVD Recorder with 40GB Hard Disk $999.00 ($100 less elsewhere)
    http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11 171683&m=1&c at=32&scat=244

    Panasonic DMR-E30S - DVD recorder no hard disk $499.99
    http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11166 712&m=1&c at=32&scat=244

    RCA SCENIUM DVD recorder with 40Gb hard disk $599.99
    http://www.circuitcity.com/frame1.jsp?BV_ SessionID =@@@@0576028405.1048273093@@@@&BV_EngineID=ccdfadc hlfhmfkkcfngcfkmdffhdffh.0&upper=head.jsp&lower=fr ame2.jsp&left=leftchildcat.jsp&right=productsearch .jsp&department=TV+Video+and+Camcorders&category=D igital+Video+Recorders

    Philips DVDR1500 DVD Recorder $685.00
    http://techbargains.pricegrabber.com/sear ch_getpro d.php/masterid=520049/search=recorder/ut=c6cfdfee8 9ddea4c

  80. SonicBlue == Go Video by Vengeance · · Score: 1

    I've got one of their CD/VHS players, my father-in-law has a double-deck VCR from them.

    Those machines are actually fairly decent, and I think the Go Video was the first consumer-level dual-deck VCR I'd ever seen... I think they cost about 700 bucks when they came out years ago.

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  81. dammit by austad · · Score: 1

    There goes all that SBLU stock I owned. 52 shares now worth a whoppin' .067 each. Maybe with my $3.50 I can buy a beer. No, I can't... sigh....

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  82. crooks by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Once again, corporation goes out on a limb, doesn't do well, and decides to put its burden on the rest of the community, and fuck over its shareholders.

    I hope that TiVo continues, as people who paid for that box have a right to get the service they paid for -- that, or a refund.

    I also hope that the RioVolt line of products doesn't bite the dust, as they are excellent.

  83. Seconded. by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    I can second that. I didn't stop getting spam until I started bouncing all of their mail to every corporate address that I could find (and addresses of their upstream).

    Good riddance to bad rubbish.

  84. No surprise by psycho_driver · · Score: 1

    Anyone who went through the Savage 2000 support debaucle back when SonicBlue was still S3 has probably seen this coming for miles and miles. Same shoddy management. Same poor marketing and end-user support.

    Good riddance.

  85. ReplayTV by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    One of my buddies has one of these and it kicks ass. He has software on his computer that allows him to archive the mpeg2 stream off the replay unit. He then makes custom DVD's with menus and the works.

    The uncool feature of the Replay unit is that it has to "call home" and get some authorization to continue working (I think every 30 days)

    I'm speculating that they'll either continue this feature and your subscription will just transfer to this new company or they'll send down a software update that'll turn off this feature.

    I'm on a quest to build my own PVR using an haupauge DVR capture card (with a mpeg2 hardware encoder) that'll allow me to archive content to DVD (but I want to do it so it's all automatic) I don't need menus and all that stuff. I just want to pop in a DVD-R and scroll down choose which shows I want to archive and hit the "archive" button and presto, (after 15 minutes) out pops a DVD.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  86. Damn by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
    I was waiting for this -- networked, progressive scan dvd player that plays audio & video media files off a PC. Even a PCMCIA slot for a wireless card!

    Seems like a great play to me. No MPEG4 though.

    --

    If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  87. RioVolt. by Mullen · · Score: 1

    If you can get a RioVolt 250 or 300 for cheap, do so. I have a 250 and it is one of the best products I have every owned, next to my TiVo. Never skips, plays MP3's, built in recharger and fairly lite.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
  88. Nice Yellow Journalism by splatter · · Score: 2

    Come on Taco,

    What does "ReplayTV maker Sonicblue to file for Chapter 11" actually means "ReplayTV and Rio maker Sonicblue is a goner?"

    Nothing.. like many other posters commented chapter 11 is not closing it's doors, its reorginization. and any good editor would have know to make that distinction.

    Oh and BTW "that $140 deal on Amazon isn't looking so hot now, is it?" Thanks for alienating all the replay users. I for one wont be contributing to ANY of YOUR causes any more. Or reading tacos shitty ass posts either.

    Yeah burn my karma I don't care this heats me up.

    DP

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  89. Sonic Blue...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He needed the money! Ohh...

    Andrew "Dice" Clay

    Sorry I could not resist.

  90. Foreshadowing? by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    I have a Rio PMP300, the very first mp3 player ever made. I love it, even if it has a few drawbacks(32mb card limit, no usb).
    And mentioning ReplayTV reminds me of an article from last year saying how Tivo is doomed to fail because they invented the modern PVR.
    That might not happen now that SonicBlue is bankrupt.
    Funny how ironic it is. SonicBlue died due to other mp3 players, and possibly could have killed Tivo Corp with THEIR PVR.

  91. No problem... by OneFix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm glad I did my homework before I bought ...

    I own a RioVolt ... not made by Sonicblue, but made by iRiver ...

    It's actually not that bad in my case, because iRiver also makes the firmware (Sonicblue is real slow even though all they have to do is change the device ID) ... which is the same source code for all of the MP3/CD Players they make ...

    So, I still get new features on my RioVolt ... and faster than Sonicblue released firmwares in the past ...

  92. In other news, VCRs are still alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My two 1980s-era non-DRM'd VCRs are still ticking happily along. I don't even remember what company made them, and I couldn't care less. (smile)

    I have yet to see a value proposition for a PVR or for a DVD cripple-ware device (aka a DVD "player", give me a break, why would anyone buy a "player", crippled at the outset by not being a recorder?) which would lead me to upgrade my VCRs. Give me as a purchaser what I want, make it a hardware device independent of DRM and "software as a service" and downloaded monthly-fee "program guides", in other words, make it just as easy as my two VCRs, and maybe, just maybe, I'll switch.

    I feel sorry for all you young'uns who don't remember when consumer products were manufactured with an interest towards serving the customer rather than some company. One sale - DONE! Relationship with company complete, and ended. Cold hard cash in company's hands, and cold hard product in my hands I could do anything I want with. Man, oh man, I remember when I actually used to buy stuff, when consumer products were actually worth the money...

    Oh, yeh, and in other news, the economy is still sluggish, not enough people are buying the new consumer schlock. Hmmm, go figure...

  93. Long Time Coming by MachineShedFred · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a former employee that went through the transition from Diamond Multimedia to S3 and eventually to SonicBlue, and being layed off when they decided to close the communications division, I saw this happening two years ago.

    Working in the Rio / Comm Division QA labs, I saw that the place to be taking these products was to converge the digital media devices you make with home networking solutions that you also make. There were a few products that made it out the doors that did this (the Dell Digital Audio Receiver and Rio Receiver), and they worked quite well; but soon after, the communications division was to be shut.

    In that reorganization, I saw some incredibly talented engineers (who had been around since before Diamond had bought Supra, and were responsible for the incredible SupraFAXModem and SupraSonic lines) laid off and get instantly hired by other companies in the SW Washington / NW Oregon area, such as Sharp Labs, Logitech, and Intel. These people still work there, creating great products.

    Now that the age of wireless-in-the-home and broadband networking are upon us, SonicBlue has to buy home networking equipment that they once engineered to incorporate into devices that they once had on the engineering roadmap. Due to incredible mismanagement, along with exorborant costs of moving offices, and newfound competition from the digital audio core market (thanks, Apple!) the strain was too much to bear.

    Now I will finally get some form of profit from the Employee Stock Purchase Program, in the form of a failed-investment tax writeoff...

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  94. What will happen to the network? I have an answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The network is actually owned and operated by another company. When you signed up for monthly or lifetime memberships, Sonic Blue got a one shot "commission" on the sale. This network also supports the built in TVGuide that my TV has and some of the scrolling menues on sat or cable TV. As I understand it, the Sonic Blue devices will continue to function properly for an indefinate amount of time.

  95. Return the site. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that the QuickBasic site can have the URL back?
    quickbasic sonicblue
    Has the old QB website pages

  96. Great idea! by digital+photo · · Score: 1

    That sounds like a great idea... bounce spam to the people who spam you... wish it was as simple with the generic spam which hits the procmails..

  97. Well big surprise by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Look who's in charge: "We have great confidence in our business units, and worked to develop a plan that would permit SONICblue to continue operating within the significant constraints imposed by our debt and legacy liabilities," said Gregory Ballard, Chief Executive Officer, SONICblue. He 0 for 2 now.... batting .000

  98. Re:What will happen to the network? I have an answ by gonzoboy · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the SonicBlue Site

    Dear Customers,

    ReplayTV values your business. We are committed to seamlessly transitioning the ReplayTV Service to the product lineâ(TM)s new owners. Everyone on the ReplayTV team will be working closely with the new owners to ensure that our customers continue to receive the award-winning ReplayTV Service without interruption.

    We are optimistic about our future and appreciate your support through this transition.

    Thank you,

    The ReplayTV Team

  99. This doesn't bode well for the Rio MP3 car! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I know not that many people own one anyway, but I have one of the Rio "MPEG car" players. IMHO, this is one of the coolest products ever sold under the Rio/SonicBlue name - even though it's discontinued and apparently wasn't ever really profitable for them.

    Since it's a Linux based player, there is still active support and 3rd. party patches/updates for it. (One guy is even trying to get a working GPS system shoehorned into it!) Still, the "core" code it runs with was provided on SonicBlue's support site, and still received occasional bug-fix updates.

    The last rumor I heard was that the developers were coding for a newer in-car music player product, but were doing update support for the old Rio MPEG Car players on the side, and as sort of a test-bed for changes they were thinking of putting in the new unit.

    Sounds like "official" support might dry up now.

  100. I doubt I will ever buy another Motorola phone by Artifex · · Score: 1

    I've got a replacement P280 from T-Mobile, that is showing some of the same firmware issues as the first one. It hasn't started garbling screens or dialed numbers, yet, like the first one, but it already screws up appointments set in its calendar more than a month in advance. For example, I set some July birthdays into the calendar a couple of weeks ago, and last weekend they went off.

    (I know it's not the SIM card, because I got a replacement from a local store before the phone got replaced)

    Again, this is the second P280 I've had that has had this problem. Oh, and the first P280 had extremely slow menus, but I just put up with it. This one is much faster (possibly because the new SIM card was a different model, because I was assured by Voicestream and T-Mobile people that they never upgrade the firmware on the phones they sell), but without the calendar being useful, it can't compete with the Samsung I could have bought at the time for less. Now, of course, they're even more of a non-player.

    Not to mention that I only "upgraded" to my P280 because my Motorola P7389's speaker died just after Voicestream's (before it turned into T-Mobile) replacement ran out, while I was on a trip. After buying the new phone (I needed the phone for work), I bought a full set of Torx and took the phone apart, re-bent the flat speaker spring-type leads, and it started working again. How those leads could have bent away remains a mystery, but I chalk it down to poor case design since it must have flexed repeatedly.

    So, anyway, since I can't get T-Mobile to credit me with the price of the phone so I can get a different brand and model, I've decided that I'll keep calling them for a replacement every time my current phone barfs up another appointment.

    (And don't get me started on how crappy T-Mobile is. They can't even keep their billing up-to-the-month on their website. Last month, my November bill was still the latest it showed.

    And when I first called support about the phone, they made me drive across town to a store to get the SIM card, instead of sending me one. The guy there said the call center should have sent me one, gave me one, and then told me to go home and call the service number again to get the phone replaced. When I got home, support told me that the store should have processed the replacement, but at least they voluntarily offered to credit me for the $15 UPS fee if I wanted UPS instead of the free postal delivery. On the call I made earlier this week to replace this replacement phone, they refused to do that again, so I opted for the free postal delivery this time. Not a big deal - they will probably be sending me a lot of boxes anyway until my contract (and phone warranty) run out in July.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  101. Good Riddance by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a Rio 500. The firmware immediatly corrupted, rendering the device useless. Sonicblue's tools failed.

    I'm happy w/ my Nomad IIC now.

  102. Got my replay unit with from Panasonic by discovercomics · · Score: 1

    Good thing I got my replay unit with lifetime sub from PANASONIC...They are still in business and will have to support or refund

  103. I'm pretty sure "poorly managed" is the answer... by writertype · · Score: 1
    ...given they fired their first chief executive and replaced him with the vp of marketing, Greg Ballard, who happened to run 3Dfx, bought card maker STB (oops!) and then sold off the company's assets to Nvidia, which then produced the underwhelming GeForceFX.

    So that's my argument, anyway.

  104. Re:Greg Ballard of 3dfx and Sonic Blue is to blame by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 0

    Didn't a bunch of corrupt board members oust Greg Ballard after he revealed they were milking the company with large corporate loans? Serves them right that they go bankrupt. This is what happens when corrupt board members take control. They run the company into the ground. Just my opinion.

  105. question by Erris · · Score: 1
    I got the impression they DRM'd their player about a year ago moving it from a USB file system to something that required a stupid Windoze based client. Is that impresion correct?

    I got a Zaurus, it rocks.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  106. big fault by Erris · · Score: 1
    I don't fault Tivo for this - they are certainly showing they work hard to keep people from being able to extract video, which will probably be good for them in the long run. They're still cool about hard drive upgrades, but that's about all the hacking you can do on the newest units.

    So what's wrong with extracting video? Is that sort of like the crime of making a VHS copy and putting it on the shelf? Or is it more like the real horror of sharing that tape with my friends? God help the fan club! I'm not buying things from people who treat me like a criminal. They can rot if that's their attitude.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:big fault by zsmooth · · Score: 1

      They're not doing it because they think it's wrong for me to save my TV shows. They're doing it to cover themselves in court when the networks are trying to put them out of business. I'd do the same thing if I was them. Tivo is out to make money, not make some philosophical statement about my right to save 150 hours of Star Trek episodes and Japanese porno cartoons on my hard drive.

      If Tivo's anti-hacking schemes make you feel like your being treated like a criminal, snatch of one of those soon-to-be-a-doorstop ReplayTV's.

    2. Re:big fault by weaknees · · Score: 1
      So what's wrong with extracting video? Is that sort of like the crime of making a VHS copy and putting it on the shelf? Or is it more like the real horror of sharing that tape with my friends? God help the fan club! I'm not buying things from people who treat me like a criminal. They can rot if that's their attitude.

      The problem, I think, is that the same people that brought Replay down with lawsuits and legal fees would do the same thing to TiVo. Until the issue is resolved in court or Congress, TiVo won't touch it... it's just too expensive for them to be at the legal forefront.

  107. Re: Why would you want a PVR without service by jabellas · · Score: 1

    There are several new devices coming out that do exactly what you want, like the Panasonic DMR-E30S DVD Recorder

  108. Message from the ReplayTV team... by rtechie · · Score: 1

    Right now on the front page of the SonicBlue website under "Important message from ReplayTV." is the posting:

    Dear ReplayTV customers,

    This morning, we announced the proposed sale of ReplayTV. Rest assured that the ReplayTV service you have come to love will not be affected or interrupted in any way as a result of this process. In fact, we plan to continue to innovate, and believe that the ReplayTV service will only improve through this transition. So relax, enjoy ReplayTV, and rest assured that it will be business as usual.

    We are very excited about our future, and we appreciate your continued support and business during this brief transition.

    Thank you,
    The ReplayTV Team

  109. Reasons to be optimistic... by rtechie · · Score: 1

    First off, I don't think anyone is really lamenting the loss of the Rio line. There are now plent of other high quality MP3 players available. In fact, the dying Rio line helped contribute to the failure of SONICBlue.

    However, I think that there are reasons to be optimistic about the ReplayTV line.

    SONICBlue was invloved in a major lawsuit with the MPAA, etc. over the commercial skip and sharing features of the ReplayTV, this is the same company (then know as Diamond Multimedia) that won the Rio lawsuit against the RIAA, etc. that legitimized MP3 players. During that lawsuit, one definitely got the sense that the the electronics manufacturers (Panasonic, Sony, Sanyo, etc.) were anxiously awaiting the results of the lawsuit so that THEY could get into the business. Ironically, the freedom of other players in the market is what led to the failure of the Rio line.

    IMHO, SONICBlue was poised to WIN the ongoing lawsuit, and win decisively. I got the same sense as in the Rio lawsuit that the major electronics manufacturers were waiting for the results of the ReplayTV lawsuit before jumping into the market. Now that ReplayTV has been purchased by a significant electronics manufacturer (Denon/Maranz) we can expect the lawsuit to go forward and new ReplayTVs to sport even better units with innovative (and "contraversial") features.

    OTOH, current ReplayTV owners (like me) might still be screwed.

  110. Pony up some cash to help. You might make more! by stomv · · Score: 1

    Furthermore -- want to help it succeed on Wall Street?

    Buy some stock. Tivo currently has a marketcap of something like $307 million dollars. If 10,000 Tivo users each bought $100 in stock, that'd be a cool million. You might think that .33% of a stock isn't enough to nudge it upward, but it is.

    And consider this -- how many folks can afford to put in $200 or $500? The fact is, you can bump the stock price up. If the price can consistently stay above $7, it will attract far more general investors (who are wary of penny stocks).

    I wouldn't do it because I don't care about Tivo. But, I do have 5% of my portfolio in other linux stocks, and don't give a damn about profits. If every ha}{0r or n00b or l3t3 kernal coder would buy up some shares, it would make a difference in price -- and stability -- of our favourite companies, particularly the small ones.

    Even in open source, you can still vote with your dollars, both at the register and in the bigger market.

  111. Re:Poor Sonic :-( ... 5 gB of WMAs...MOD PARENT UP by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    Well, it's happened... An anti-proprietary-software post has been modded down, indicating that it is wrong to support platformless software. The end-times are near....

  112. Why not make ReplayTV opensource? by fl8.rsk · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I'm new to the scene and haven't checked all the past posts, but if SonicBlue is going under, why not just open the source for ReplayTV. Someone could easily adapt it to obtain the program schedule from the cable broadcast, just as my television and cable box do. Has this been done? Does anyone know of a hack for ReplayTV? I mean, I coughed up $350 for an 80-hour box, and $250 for a "lifetime" (apparently a fruit-fly's lifetime, not mine) membership fee. I am going to be ticked off if my ReplayTV turns into a paperweight!

  113. Re:The real story - dvd recorder w/hd + TIVO by weaknees · · Score: 1

    The REAL story is TiVo+DVD recorder. The current DVD recorders are for the techies, while a TiVo+DVD recorder would be for the masses and could really gain traction.

  114. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    I'D LIKE TO BE BURIED INDIAN-STYLE, where they put you up on a high rack,
    above the ground. That way, you could get hit by meteorites and not even
    feel it.
    -- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...