Slashdot Mirror


Searching for the Oldest Running Application

A columnist from InternetWeek has completed a search for the oldest running commercial software application. His results are interesting (note that he's mostly skipping over mainframe applications, just looking at PC-based apps).

305 of 433 comments (clear)

  1. It's got to be by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello World!!!

    1. Re:It's got to be by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny

      10 PRINTLN "HELLO WORLD"
      20 GOTO 10

      And this is filler, since my impersonation of pre-shift key BASIC triggered the lameness filter

      --

    2. Re:It's got to be by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Hey, I modified a thread engineering program for a TRS-80 for a friend's machine shop back in 1981, and wrote them a new version completely from scratch in GW-BASIC in 1982. They are still using it today (although I had to port it to the IBM PC Basic compiler.) I also wrote a brute-force change gear combination searcher that took a few minutes to sift through all their possible gear combinations.

      At least they've upgraded their PCs a few times since then. But the software still runs. It just runs faster (the gear calculator now has the results before the screen refreshes.)

      --
      John
    3. Re:It's got to be by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, I'll confess -- My line 10 was really "PRINTLN "I LOVE AMY MCCRACKEN"
      It was the 3rd grade, what did you expect?

      --

    4. Re:It's got to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      i've been running this:
      .LOOP:
      JMP .LOOP
      on my commodore 64 since 1983. i'm still waiting for it to finish. maybe if i got a faster computer.
    5. Re:It's got to be by penginkun · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know the syntax for earlier home computers, but under Applesoft BASIC, it'd be:

      10 PRINT "HI"
      20 END

      followed immediately after by:

      10 PRINT "HI"
      20 GOTO 10

      I'm guessing it wouldn't have been much different. ^_^

    6. Re:It's got to be by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Funny
      10 PRINTLN "HELLO WORLD"
      20 GOTO 10

      That's going to produce 0HELLO WORLD as repeating output, which I don't think is what you want. LN is an uninitialized variable. PRINTLN isn't a valid command, but it'll get interpreted as PRINT LN, which will display as 0.

      (The scary part is that I fired up Applewin to verify those results...I was going to fire back ?SYNTAX ERROR IN 10 as a reply. I have no life. :-) )

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    7. Re:It's got to be by tenman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Now they have Java versions of this file...

    8. Re:It's got to be by stixman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Put in on Linux. It does infinite loops in 5 seconds, man. Fsckin' awesome.

      --
      -
    9. Re:It's got to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      May I suggest Pioneer 10's stabilizer program.

    10. Re:It's got to be by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      On a Commodore 64, you'll just get a syntax error, since there's no PRINTLN command.

      You must be awfully young if you learned BASIC on an Apple...

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:It's got to be by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the fact that Apples (Apple 1, ca 1976) predate Commodores.

      Apple was the first system to ship with a Basic Interpreter IIRC

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    12. Re:It's got to be by McPierce · · Score: 1

      PRINTLN isn't a valid command, but it'll get interpreted as PRINT LN, which will display as 0.

      What are you talking about? println is a valid BASIC command.

      --
      Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
    13. Re:It's got to be by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      PRINTLN isn't a valid command, but it'll get interpreted as PRINT LN, which will display as 0.

      What are you talking about? println is a valid BASIC command.

      Not in any BASIC I've ever used (Applesoft, Integer BASIC, TI BASIC, Color & Extended Color BASIC, Atari BASIC (& Microsoft BASIC for 8-bit Ataris), etc.). You use PRINT to generate text output. Maybe it's valid syntax for Visual BASIC or something like that...if it is, that would explain why VB bears as much resemblance to BASIC as INTERCAL bears to BASIC.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:It's got to be by McPierce · · Score: 1
      Not in any BASIC I've ever used (Applesoft, Integer BASIC, TI BASIC, Color & Extended Color BASIC, Atari BASIC (& Microsoft BASIC for 8-bit Ataris), etc.). You use PRINT to generate text output. Maybe it's valid syntax for Visual BASIC or something like that...if it is, that would explain why VB bears as much resemblance to BASIC as INTERCAL bears to BASIC.

      I'm thinking more GW BASIC, APPLE & IBM PC[jr]. On all of those platforms, it was available. Also, on the ATARI I seem to recall the same, though at the time I did more assembler than BASIC programming. I didn't do much with the TI or CoCo computers. I've never used Visual BASIC so couldn't respond there.

      It may be that the versions you've worked with were lacking the keyword or that you just never used it? Do you have references to documentation for those versions that list their completely keyword set?

      Some references available online:

      --
      Darryl L. Pierce "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
  2. Mainframe by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    note that he's mostly skipping over mainframe applications, just looking at PC-based apps

    That makes a biiig difference. I'm contracted out to a bank that has a mainframe system thats been in operation for around 30 years, beating the program her found.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Mainframe by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      video games too. somewhere out there there's a working space invaders that beats it too

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    2. Re:Mainframe by EdgeShadow · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't mean to be nitpicky, but if you'd bothered to read the whole article you'd have noticed that he mentioned a mainframe program called DATAMOD that dates back to October 1971, which is over 30 years ago. As the main focus of his article was PC applications, however, his article did not give much information on mainframe apps.

    3. Re:Mainframe by iocat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My girlfriend's mom wrote some of the first conversions of actuarial tables to mainframe, from books, in the 1950s and 1960s (all done w/ punch cards and machine language, of course) at a life insurance company in Mass. The company was still running a lot of her orgininal code when she retired a couple of years ago.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:Mainframe by obotics · · Score: 1

      On a related note, I am sure that someone out there still has a working pong sitting in their garage somewhere... :-)

    5. Re:Mainframe by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

      My girlfriend's mom wrote some of the first conversions of actuarial tables to mainframe, from books, in the 1950s and 1960s (all done w/ punch cards and machine language, of course) at a life insurance company in Mass. The company was still running a lot of her orgininal code when she retired a couple of years ago.

      This is obviously an apocryphal story.

      Who can spot the inconsistancy that gives this fakery away?




      Exactly.

      We all know /.'ers don't have girlfriends.

    6. Re:Mainframe by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey now.. A lot of slashdotters have girlfriends.. They just don't look like girls.

    7. Re:Mainframe by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 1

      I think I may have worked near her programs. I used to work in actuarial at an insurance company in Mass that had actuarial black-boxes dating back to around then (written in Assembly, of course)--a friend of mine got the envious task of rewriting some of them into C to make them a little more maintainable/usable...

    8. Re:Mainframe by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Funny
      Reminds me of the old joke (suitably changed for /.):

      What's the difference between a /. girlfriend and an elephant?

      About 200lbs!

      How do you make them the same?

      Put the Elephant on a diet!

      Ah yes, humor at its worst...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    9. Re:Mainframe by dubbreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey now.. A lot of slashdotters have girlfriends.. They just don't look like girls.

      More like a CRT with wires to a grey box with led's and optical drives? The only reason i have a gf is she hasn't read my browser history.. "Oh, you read slashdot?" (puts shirt back on, walks out door).. Now if she found out i posted as well...

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    10. Re:Mainframe by nomel · · Score: 1

      I do! It's "Super Pong" though. Has a "game mode" switch that lets you pick the mode...such as holes instead of paddles. I need to fire it up one of these days...ran on D cell batteries too, so no need to plug it in to a power outlet!

      I remember I used to try to play it without the TV, just by the sounds...I would hit the ball every once and a while, a couple times in a row...but the computer always beat me.

    11. Re:Mainframe by mezron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, they look like a palm ;)

    12. Re:Mainframe by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

      Sometimes they do if you squint hard enough.

    13. Re:Mainframe by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      Come on now! You expect us to believe that you managed to get her shirt off before she figured out that you're a Slashdot geek?

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
    14. Re:Mainframe by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1
      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    15. Re:Mainframe by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      ok maybe i meant jacket.. ;)

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    16. Re:Mainframe by Savatte · · Score: 1

      The best part about the palm is that you can smack it around as much as you want, but it always comes back and is within arms reach.

  3. Oldest and most influential.... by Xandar01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Solitaire

    --
    Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
    1. Re:Oldest and most influential.... by obotics · · Score: 1

      Dude, you haven't played Windows card games until you have played Freecell :-)

  4. My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On a 8088. It works so why change. Which is actually really true. Sometimes why do you need to upgrade to a faster computer if all you want to do is run 1 application that is simple and does the job quite well. Lotus 123 for DOS on an 8088 is quite stable and fast to. (it feels faster then running excel on a 1ghz system) The 8088 and lotus 123 is bassicly the right tool for the right job. Why complain or tinker with it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Funny
      bassicly the right tool for the right job. Why complain or tinker with it.

      You must be new here... [/tongueincheek]

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    2. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by bre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lotus 123 seems to the job quite well for his dad, so why should he change hundreds of options to customize his excel to do the same for a lot of more money?
      Having a lot of options does not necessarily mean that a program is better suited for a problem than a simple one...

    3. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      Share work with who? No one within a city radius still uses that program.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    4. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by escher · · Score: 1

      I actually have (in a box in my room) Lotus 123 for the PCjr. A few floppies and two cartridges!

      Unfortunately, the PCjr itself died a few years back.

    5. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by 2sleep2type · · Score: 1

      The first full time 'programing' work I did was putting together some macro's in 123. I increased the output of 3 people by over 100% with 2 days development. Now that's an ROI I dream of today. They where still in use a few years ago, I believe they still will be now. Unless the machine it's running on has packed up. 123 was a great spreadsheet. It had a fair amount of on screen help. Was quick to use and powerfull. I remeber that it was ruined by a very poor windows port that was very unstable. Lots of patches and x works under patch 1 but y dosn't.

    6. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Interesting
      why change? maybe because excel xp has hundreds of more options than lotus 123 and is easier to share work.
      For a brief period of time my mother-in-law entertained the notion of becoming a medical transcriptionist. The doctors rattle something off into a handheld recorder, you get the tape, you type it out. One of those on-the-side businesses.

      So we do some investigation and one of the things she'd need is WordPerfect. I don't remember if this was a requirement (like she'd be sending these files digitally) or if it was just the "accepted thing", but we started to research how much it would cost to get her WordPerfect, which we though was sorta asinine since her PC already had Word (came with the machine of course).

      Then we found out that you really had to have WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS. You know, the one with the blue screen and a slow, VGA-based preview mode.

      Of course I didn't know then how in the world you would even acquire a legitimate copy of that. Or even if it was possible.

      We found someone else in the business and asked her why in the world this ancient program was still being used. She told us that the legal and medical professions still use WP5.1 religiously both because everyone's so used to it and because everything in the program since that version just slows them down. Remember, these people are the ones typing the volumes and volumes of legal and medical documents out there. They want productivity and they want it now. They don't want to wait the half second for Word to figure out whatver it's doing in the background to render bullet points.

      WordPerfect released WP6 for DOS at one point, probably the most advanced graphical application DOS ever saw. But of course few if anyone wanted that - they either fell into the camp which wanted the lean and mean DOS WP5.1 or the people who were already seeing how nice Windows made everything look already. To this end WordPerfect even released a WP5.1+ to give WP5.1 compatibility with WP5.1 documents. WordPerfect was also pretty good about at least trying to be on every desktop platform, like OS/2 and Linux. WordPerfect was then bought and sold about five times, and for the last three or four major versions has been on board the sinking ship that is Corel. Hell, Corel even tried to pit it on Java at one point.

      So the short version of the story is - the reason people don't want to change is that sometimes the options slow them down. Plus there is such a thing as version lock-in syndrome. Ask any psychotic Counter-Strike player which version is better and they'll tell you "man, every release since version (whatever) sucks!"

    7. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by werdna · · Score: 1

      There's also Visicalc on a 6502. But many applications antedate that.

    8. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Arandir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a couple of medical transciptionists, and WP5.1 is king. Why? Because when you're typing 120 WPM you can't afford to reach for the mouse. Because they all have these medical dictionary modules that are written for WP5.1. And because when your word processor is your job, you really don't give a rat's ass if it has a GUI or not.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    9. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by PlaysByEar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everyone (incorrectly) believes DOS == bad, no mouse == bad. What they fail to realize is how all the mouse movements/menu naviation slow you down. I just left a job where they are getting ready to transition to a Windows program because "DOS is bad." I bet it won't seem so bad when they see how it takes twice as long to do the same task. There's a reason for the name keyboard shortcuts. I hope their new program has them.

    10. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait till the drive releases it's magic smoke, or wait until the CPU calls it quits. While it's been reliable, it'll eventually fry itself out...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    11. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by odin53 · · Score: 1

      told us that the legal and medical professions still use WP5.1 religiously both because everyone's so used to it and because everything in the program since that version just slows them down. Remember, these people are the ones typing the volumes and volumes of legal and medical documents out there.

      At least at big law firms, no one uses WP5.1 anymore -- everyone uses Word. Still, many firms only recently (within the past 5 years or so) transitioned from it.

    12. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      WP5.1 rocks. Last good version they ever made. The graphical versions that followed were never stable, or even close to fast. Can't count how many division by zero errors I got in 6.0.

      I still find myself wanting to do 'reveal codes' in Word 2000...

    13. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by jokercito · · Score: 1

      Damn it! Because we can! :P

      It's a joke. Laugh! Har har!

    14. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Forge · · Score: 1

      Someone else uses the name "Bill Gates" on Slashdot in all the popular variations.

      If he loged on as B1!! G@T335 you wouldn't belive it :)

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    15. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mice don't slow you down when you are typing 120 wpm, so that's not the reason. Legal/Medical types use WP5.1 for one of three reasons, and none of them have to do with speed.

      1) Their documents have have less formatting than this slashdot post. All 10pt double-spaced Courier. The medical types don't even bother with pucntuation sometimes.

      2) They've got macros that they bought 10 years ago that won't convert. WP even sold a document managment system at one time.

      3) Those two industries are notorious tightasses. Yes, they will run WP to the end of time just to avoid spending $1K on a new computer.

    16. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      WP5.1 is the one app I absolutely can't live without. I own newer versions (up thru WP2002) and use them for stuff that needs fonts or complex layouts. But when I want to get real work done, particularly creative work, I revert to old 5.1 for DOS, usually running in a Win32 DOS window.

      Why? Because it lets me just *type*. I don't have to think about anything else. There are no technical distractions. When you're in the grip of the creative writing process, you don't want to be arguing with your software.

      And it will run on any piece of crap PC, all the way back to a two-floppy 2MHz XT, on almost any species of DOS or Windows. I need never wonder if whichever-available-PC will run it.

      So, yep, when I want efficiency, I don't give a rat's ass if it has a GUI or not. In fact, I'd just as rather the "not". :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by thynk · · Score: 1

      Everyone (incorrectly) believes DOS == bad, no mouse == bad.

      Maybe not everyone! I grew up beliving that mice belonged in cages, windows belonged in walls and menus were for restraunts.

      Up until I found a decient emulator, My C64 was still in service until a few years ago (awsome games). I still play M.U.L.E. On the NES emulator from time to time too.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    18. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If anything (except the hard drive) breaks, sticking the hard drive in a new system shouldn't be difficult. Many machines still have ISA slots.

      If the hard drive craps out, he may be out of luck, but I'd trust that hard drive over a modern one. Hope he's backing up onto floppies (preferably 3 1/4 inch).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    19. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Amen on the hard drive - we have an 85MB connor drive at work that is 12 years old. It's still booted / used 8-10 hours a day to run a DOS PLC control system for our lab and shut off overnight.

      Yes, I've made a backup, over IPX via our mars-nwe netware emulator on our file server that connects it to the 'modern' world. It's backed up to a drive that's *one thousand* times larger. Ah, the never-ending march of technology.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    20. Re:My Dad Still uses Lotus 123 by werdna · · Score: 1

      Or Wizardry, heh heh

      Thanks, but Frankston and Bricklin were certainly first. I remember the first time Wizardry beat Visicalc on the Softalk poll list was one of the high points for me.

  5. A further study might include... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...reasons for why really old software/hardware is still in use today. Many people complain that businesses are using heavily outdated software and hardware. These complaints claim that using outdated tools indicates lethargy on the part of the business or organization. However, that is not always so.

    Idealy, when programmers write code or engineers design systems, they do it with the ages in mind. While plenty of software developers think that code is throw-away, there are some like myself who like to write enduring code. Perhaps a lot of these ancient systems were just designed so well that their obsolescence is still a long ways off. In that case, the oldest software and hardware is probably to be the most coveted. You usually don't find systems or software today that lasts for decades (and if you're on Microsoft's leash, you're lucky if your software lasts for a year).

    It'd be really interesting to see the results. Are these systems really good or are the owners just really lazy?

    1. Re:A further study might include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Idealy, when programmers write code or engineers design systems, they do it with the ages in mind.

      Knowingly or unknowingly, you have said something really insightful there. I had an "aha" moment after reading your comment. Consider a Microsoft programmer working on Windows 2003. He knows that Microsoft is already working on the new improved Windows 2005, and the developer on Windows 2005 knows that plans are already under way for Windows 2007.

      Now where is the motivation to build reliability and security into the system when you know the code you are writing will not have a usage of more than two years (or so Microsoft hopes, since ideally they would like everyone to upgrade to the version du juor instantly).

      No wonder the products that come out seem like they were written in a half baked manner.

    2. Re:A further study might include... by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cost of upgrading is also a major factor. I work with financial institutes, many which use mainframes and some with cobol programmers, etc. All the backend systems still work, work in a reliable time, and have yet to really break. Why spend the tens of millions of dollars and the years to upgrade to a new high-end DB, and reprogram an entire backend to a system which isn't broke in the firstplace?? And, if you decide to change, how secure are you to copy over the financies for hundreds of thousands of people and ensure that you aren't creating lawsuits (missing money) or pissing off the SEC (bad reports due to corrupt data)?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    3. Re:A further study might include... by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This though fits right into our society's view on everything being disposable.

    4. Re:A further study might include... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Enduring code is fine, and certainly preferrable, in the mainframe/server arena. However, I see no excuse for letting desktop applications fall behind the times. Users need to be able to truly own there data, and they don't in any way if they can't use it in the larger world... unless, of course, thats your intent, not letting the data escape your archaic system /grin.

    5. Re:A further study might include... by denissmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who currently runs 1 app on DOS and two apps on Windows 3.11 and has to support NT 4.0 and Mac OS 9 there are a few issues, in addition to the very accurate ones that you state.
      I manage a facility that does high-end graphics printing, and if I have a printer that is 12 years old and still makes brilliant prints, but it hasn't been marketed in 10 years then no one will write modern software to support it. So I'm "stuck" with DOS. The issue that worries me, then, is massive hadware failure on the PC, cause I have to find a pre-PCI bus computer. The second issue is data format closure ( read proprietary data formats and character settings) until we have ISO character support and XML or open data storage standards we can't have real data portability, and without data portability you are trapped in a legacy codebase. It is probably a well written peice of software ( or you wouldn't have built so much of your company around it) but it is still a trap. PROPRIETARY data formats are always a trap.

      --
      I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
    6. Re:A further study might include... by Textbook+Error · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Consider a Microsoft programmer working on Windows 2003. He knows that Microsoft is already working on the new improved Windows 2005, and the developer on Windows 2005 knows that plans are already under way for Windows 2007.

      Do you really think they throw it away each time? Unless you're working on something that's pure marketing fluff, code written for one release has a very good chance of being around in the future.

      It's a law of nature that code always lives longer than you expect - the cost of throwing things away and rewriting from scratch is almost always worse than the downside of massaging it to deal with the next requirement. It's the mark of good software that it's ameanable to that - unless you're writing a throw-away bit of toy code for yourself, you should assume that anything you check in is probably going to be around in some form for years...

      Happened to me recently when doing consultancy work for a company I used to work for 10 years ago. They still have modules which are pretty much unchanged since I wrote them way back when as a new grad, minus the inevitable bug fixes and new features.

      --

      Nae bother
    7. Re:A further study might include... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Witness UNIX and it's clones. MS would have you believe that running an OS or using programing tools from 1995 is wrong but I somehow don't think everyone around here would agree.

      TW

    8. Re:A further study might include... by GebsBeard · · Score: 1

      This is a dead on statement. It is irritating to hear people bash decades-old "obsolete" programs in production in one statement then turn around and lament the woeful state of software stability in todays world in the next. You can't have it both ways folks. You either have rock solid stability, in which case you can *expect* businesses to stick to the product like glue - even over a period of decades - or you can pick up software with the latest flash bang (which as we're now learning will frequently flash then crash with a bang).

    9. Re:A further study might include... by Slamtilt · · Score: 1

      Many people complain that businesses are using heavily outdated software and hardware. These complaints claim that using outdated tools indicates lethargy on the part of the business or organization. However, that is not always so.

      The thing is, people who say "This software is old! We demand an upgrade!" are often actually saying "This software is crap! We demand good software!". Sadly, they don't generally realize that the crapness is the root of their complaints. IME, if the software is reliable and not particularly difficult to use, you can get many year's worth of production out of it, without real complaints from the users.

      The problems arise when you have to upgrade some other thing which forces an upgrade of your old but working thing. It's hard to guarantee the upgrade won't be crappier.

  6. Does he use the Spinocylinder? by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 4, Funny
    My chiropractor is still using Medi-Soft on his 286-10MHz with 512-Kbit RAM and an old 40-Mbyte drive, running DOS 5. He refuses to spend the time to learn something new.

    Yeah, that's a guy I want to be adjusting my back. Probably doesn't believe in that 'new fangled' aspirin for aches, either.

    1. Re:Does he use the Spinocylinder? by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shit, he believes in chiropractic for starters. Doesn't that worry you enough?

    2. Re:Does he use the Spinocylinder? by obotics · · Score: 1

      .... and how did you find this out exactly?....... :-)

    3. Re:Does he use the Spinocylinder? by sbillard · · Score: 1

      Patent pending.
      Patent pending.
      Patent pending.
      Oh yeah, you too - patent pending.

    4. Re:Does he use the Spinocylinder? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably doesn't believe in that 'new fangled' aspirin for aches, either.

      So he's still using opium? Heck, in that case sign me up!

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:Does he use the Spinocylinder? by knobbyberry · · Score: 1
      My chiropractor is still using Medi-Soft on his 286-10MHz with 512-Kbit RAM and an old 40-Mbyte drive, running DOS 5.

      It sounds like the Chiropractor you're talking about is my father. But FWIW, vertical-market apps are not cheap, and for the medical market (with which Chiropractic shares the same insurance-billing related processes), there's an expectation that you'll have big big $$$ to burn (upgrades aren't much cheaper than outright purchases). My dad practices part-time out of his home, and for him, if it ain't broke, it don't need fixin.

    6. Re:Does he use the Spinocylinder? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      he believes in chiropractic for starters. Doesn't that worry you enough?

      Chiropractors *do* statistically help according to one study I read. They are just more expensive than a "regular" back doctor. The advice was to try your regular HMO first and go thru their programs. If they fail (and you still have money), then try the chiro.

  7. How about you? by iocat · · Score: 2

    Hey slashdot community, what's the oldest program you've seen running at the office or home, not counting classic games? Personally I've been using Bank Street Filer on Apple //c (c. 1983) to catalog my game collection, just for kicks. Most of my collection is classic games, so it seems appropriate...

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    1. Re:How about you? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      well, if I fired up my C64 (with Star NP10 dotmatrix printer) I could have Bank Street Writer running....

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:How about you? by nbvb · · Score: 1

      I still have a 5.25" floppy with BSW for MS-DOS 1.0 on it somewhere.

      I had the Apple //e version as well, but I have no idea where that floppy went ....

    3. Re:How about you? by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      'ls' in PDP-10 compatibility mode?

    4. Re:How about you? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hey slashdot community, what's the oldest program you've seen running at the office or home, not counting classic games? Personally I've been using Bank Street Filer on Apple //c (c. 1983) to catalog my game collection, just for kicks.

      I still log vehicle maintenance (oil changes, repairs, etc.) in some spreadsheets under AppleWorks 3.0 (released in 1989). As simple as the data are in the files, I could just move them to text files and edit them with Notepad, but it gives me an excuse to fire up the IIGS. (It also got some use when I wrote some software (and built some hardware) a few months ago to use an Apple II as a programmable temperature controller for my beer fridge.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:How about you? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      We keep a catalog of our movie collection under AppleWorks, and about thirty 5.25" floppy disks :)

      Run it on a Apple //e clone machine, too. "Laser 128 compatable" computer. Man, thet thing's a cheap hunk o junk, but it always works when you need it to!
      =Smidge=

    6. Re:How about you? by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      Hey slashdot community, what's the oldest program you've seen running at the office or home, not counting classic games? Personally I've been using Bank Street Filer on Apple //c (c. 1983) to catalog my game collection, just for kicks. Most of my collection is classic games, so it seems appropriate...

      Back when I was still a regular reader of rec.games.video.classic, there was someone on there who was cataloging his collection with the built in business apps on a Commodore Plus-4.

      Old school, indeed.

      --saint

  8. lharc.exe by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm still using lharc.exe by good ol Yoshi.

    The archives are a little larger, and it does not take the longer file names, but for compressing one or two files it is much smaller and much easier to use than old dos PKZip (which needs 3 much larger files to do what lharc.exe does) or any Winzip version.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:lharc.exe by rigmort · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Yoshi's version a knockoff of PKarc by Phil Katz? Or was it the other way around? I used to run ino him on the BBSs of Milwaukee back in the '80s... what a waste.

    2. Re:lharc.exe by jrstewart · · Score: 1

      Actually, as noted in the documentation of early versions of LHarc, it's conceptually derived from LZari, another archiving program from Japan. There were lots of different archivers back in the day that largely shared a command set, including the early arc and zoo and the later arj. Some people may better remember lharc as `lha' as it was later renamed to match its file extension.

      I don't know whether Yoshi's or Katz's program came first, but I find it unlikely that one was a "knockoff" of the other.

      Geez. I haven't used LHarc in 10 years. I can't believe I still remember this junk.

    3. Re:lharc.exe by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, my friend was using pkunzip.exe he had gotten maybe a decade ago.

      well, sometime this spring he ran into stuff that wouldn't run on his computer for some mysterious reason, after a bit of ircing i found out why it didn't work.. since obviously it didn't handle long filenames too well :)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  9. DOS Rulz by AwesomeJT · · Score: 1
    Talk about old software, I have friends that are perfectly happy with DOS and don't want that new GUI thing. Of course, I like Linux, at least I can feel comfortable in 20 year old unix box which still hasn't needed to be rebooted.

    Over all, the quality of modern software has gone way down so I won't be surprised if there were lots of unix based applications still running.

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
  10. A good read... by Stephonovich · · Score: 1
    I found the article to be quite interesting. I did find it somewhat suprising that a business app would be the oldest. One would think a game would be, due to their immense popularity. Perhaps Atari and such thought that the PC would never dominate the consoles as a gaming platform.

    In any case, a good read.

    (-:Stephonovich:-)

    --
    "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
    1. Re:A good read... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Actually, after the game crash of '83, everyone just assumed that the gaming console was dead and buried.

      After all, why would anyone pay for a video game only device, when they could get something like a Commodore 64, play the same games, and do their taxes and write letters?

      When the Famicom was introduced to America, it was called the Nintendo Entertainment System. They restyled it to look more high-tech, with its front-loading cartridge slot, and promised keyboard and disk add-ons which never came out (they did in japan, though). They basically marketed it as a home PC system to compete with C-64s and Atari STs and PC Jrs, etc.

      It worked, and it brought the console back from the brink of extinction.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:A good read... by Stephonovich · · Score: 1

      However, I believe when the SNES came out, gaming started catching on again. Possible even the NES. And then, with the PlayStation, it really got rolling. I myself don't own a console, and am quite happy with a computer for gaming. I have friends who have consoles if I feel the need to use one:-) (-:Stephonovich:-)

      --
      "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
    3. Re:A good read... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the NES sold in far greater numbers than the PlayStation, though I could be wrong..

    4. Re:A good read... by Stephonovich · · Score: 1
      That may be. The NES kicked the console revolution. I personally believe the PlayStation kicked it into high gear though. Just like cell phones have beena around for more than a decade, but have really kicked off in the last 3-5 years.

      (-:Stephonovich:-)

      --
      "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
  11. Longest running app? by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

    Definitely the Blue Screen of Death!

    1. Re:Longest running app? by BlueShades · · Score: 1

      Along with kernel panics hahahahahaha Linus: Sure, I have had my linux box crash plenty of times. Dude from SuSe: It must be your CPU. -LW 2001 San Francisco

  12. got one right on my comp by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    My father got a 286 in 1990 and had a custom accounting software package made then for his office. Cost him some 300 $ then.

    The 286 was junked 2 years back but the the software still runs in the office on a pentium 100 and my computer too(as a backup). Other than bringing it upto date for y2k, the code is the same.

  13. Slashdotted... by BlindSpot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well we know it's definitely NOT his web server!

  14. Scorched Earth myself by Openadvocate · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can submit Scorched Earth myself. I had totally forgotten that my PC had an internal speaker until I ran it.

    --
    my sig
    1. Re:Scorched Earth myself by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude... its time to upgrade! Scorched 3D complete with an OpenGL renderer!

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Scorched Earth myself by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      Me too, but I guess that was mostly because the limited space in DOS filenames. :)

      --
      my sig
  15. MS Flight SImulator by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft Flight Simulator: A Century of Flight.

    I'd say 100 years is a fairly long-running app.

    1. Re:MS Flight SImulator by haystor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, before Windows 2000 there was Windows 3.
      I guess that would make it 2000 years old now.

      How about version numbers? Emacs is on 21.something now. I think AutoCad is up in the 16 range by now.

      --
      t
    2. Re:MS Flight SImulator by NullProg · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC They bought this from Sub-logic. I still have the original box at home. 5.25 for the Apple ][.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    3. Re:MS Flight SImulator by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Well, before Windows 2000 there was Windows 3.
      I guess that would make it 2000 years old now."


      Now I understand why Slashdot was so whoopty doo over Mozilla reaching version 1.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:MS Flight SImulator by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      No no, it's much more then that...

      Look at the bottem of the page.

      © 103 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

      I would say that 1900 years is the longest running app.

  16. Lazy IS staff by jwhitener · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like some of these places just have plain lazy IS staff. I mean, take that office still using an ancient form of Lotus notes. The excuse, "cause the mainframe can't handle uploads in any other format" or some such nonsense. You don't place the burden of old mainframe technology on the users front end.
    Any large company thats been around a while is going to have a legacy system here or there, its up to the IS staff to interface the old with the new.

    1. Re:Lazy IS staff by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      That presumes that the IS staff is up to that work, that the cost of the additional work necessary is going to be defrayed by additional productivity of the people using the applications.

      One of the problems with upgrading to Excel is that in current and upcomming versions the file format is proprietary and may not lend itself to backwards porting to a format that the programmers can work with. Breaking up Excell workbooks and saving each page as a Lotus Spreadsheet, or better yet a csv file, takes training on the part of the user, or a secondary process that has to be run either on the workstation or the mainframe.

      In a tight economy, costs are going to be carefully reviewed. A lot of projects that would be relevent will be canceled as well.

      I know of companies that still use punch cards. Sure they could update, but as long as they have punch cards, and the equipment works, why break it.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  17. err...in reply to the 'google french victory..... by captainfugacity · · Score: 1

    Reply to topic, reply to this...the buttons were so close...the offtopic was second friggin' post at the time.

  18. Damn by unicron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the entrance to my work, we have little pc set up running a dos based virus scanner app. It's been there for at LEAST 10 years. I've never seen a single person use it. About 2 weeks ago they FINALLY got rid of it. I have NEVER seen monitor burn that bad...it looked like the app had gone monochrome but it was still plain as day.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  19. I read that as the oldest *running* application... by paynter · · Score: 1

    ...which would be more-or-less equivalent to the longest uptiime, I guess.

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html

  20. WordStar by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am still running WordStar to type up my billing invoices, although I admit it is WordStar 4 rather than the original 1982 vintage PC-DOS WordStar. By the way, the Borland IDE's (Delphi, etc) were pretty WordStar compatible for the longest time, but I haven't checked lately if they still recognize all the ^KB, ^KK, and all that.

    1. Re:WordStar by Ooblek · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You're not the only one. I've run into a few people using wordstar over the years. One was a guy using it on Win95 to keep track of old correspondence. The other, if you can believe it, was my computer science college professor that ran it under one of the Windows emulators for Linux!

      But, by far, the oldest app I've seen was an audio console fader automation system. WordStar may pre-date it in history, but these were 8086 machines with Seagate st-225 20MB hard drives that ran Xenix. They were probably rarely turned off since the early '80s because they recorded and played back the fader movements on an early automated recording console. Everyone was afraid to turn them off in case the hard drives didn't spin back up.

      Come to think of it, the timeframes of when the software and hardware was available may place it into the mid- to late- 80s, but I'm sure it caught up for hours running in that time after being powered up for so long.

    2. Re:WordStar by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My dad uses WordStar in a Win2000 command window!

      He insists it's easier to use than Word or whatever.
      Easier than learning new tricks, perhaps.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    3. Re:WordStar by gmack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually for awhile word and notepad supported the wordstar command keys. Don't know if they still do as I havn't used windows on a personal machine since 98.

      Alternatly "joe" in Linux still uses the wordstar command set.

    4. Re:WordStar by spyderbyte23 · · Score: 1

      I fired up XEmacs to check -- M-x wordstar-mode is still there.

      --
      -- Support Ometz le-Serev.
    5. Re:WordStar by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      I am still running WordStar to type up my billing invoices, although I admit it is WordStar 4 rather than the original 1982 vintage PC-DOS WordStar. By the way, the Borland IDE's (Delphi, etc) were pretty WordStar compatible for the longest time, but I haven't checked lately if they still recognize all the ^KB, ^KK, and all that.
      How about JOE, an open-source editor I use on Linux???
    6. Re:WordStar by Reziac · · Score: 1

      IMO the standard Windows command keystrokes are descended mainly from WordStar, in general structure, even if not directly. Since I detest WordScar, that probably explains why to this day I still can't remember Windows standard keystrokes. :) (I've managed to avoid WS for many years now, but I use Windows every day.)

      OTOH... I don't have any problem remembering WordPerfect 5.1 DOS keystrokes. I've read that they're descended from early UNIX keystrokes as used on mainframes, hence stuff like F7 for QUIT. (I use WP5.1 every day, but seldom use any species of *NIX. Go figgur.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:WordStar by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      My company (About 3 years ago) actually deployed WordStar (for dos, forgot what version) for a customer via NT4 Terminal Services/Citrix Metaframe.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    8. Re:WordStar by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Granted, I don't use it every day, but about two weeks ago, I fired up a CP/M machine we have where I work... Z80 processor at 2.5 MHz with 32K RAM and 2 8" floppy disk drives.

      I needed to modify some old assembly source code that hadn't been moved over to a PC-based cross-assembler like most of our old source. The program I was working on was written in '86, the WordStar editor I used was from '83.

      So there.

    9. Re:WordStar by lperdue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Wordstar=good WP program. I still have 1.0 running on CP/M on my Kaypro II ... I use it sometimes for my book writing...CTRL codes a LOT better/faster than mouse.

  21. 10 years?! by Stephonovich · · Score: 1
    They left an app running for 10 years? What's the point? Were you supposed to scan stuff you brought in/took out?

    (-:Stephonovich:-)

    --
    "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
    1. Re:10 years?! by unicron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you were bringing anything from home they expected you to check it for virii on the way in.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:10 years?! by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, lets scan stuff with a 10-year old virus scanner so we can't possible infect all the computers inside that are hooked up to the internet!

    3. Re:10 years?! by unicron · · Score: 1

      Well no one ever used it so it never got updated, it's just that no one thought to excess it.

      As for being hooked up to the net nothing, NOTHING gets through. We've never had a success intrusion.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    4. Re:10 years?! by Stephonovich · · Score: 1

      Really? No virus infections ever? How many employees is your company? (-:Stephonovich:-)

      --
      "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
  22. Oldest App, or Oldest RUNNING app... by reezle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read the article the other way.
    I'm thinking it might be much more interesting to throw the mainframes, etc back into the fray, and find the oldest continually running app...

    It just might turn out to be a copy of Novell server sitting in somebody's closet, or inside a wall...

    I suppose we'd need to qualify exactly what an application is, and perhaps we'd find an example where it didn't meet the criteria when switched on way-back-when, but has had bits added to it along the way, and now does?

    1. Re:Oldest App, or Oldest RUNNING app... by sporty · · Score: 1

      You prolly mean oldest app or longest running app. :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Oldest App, or Oldest RUNNING app... by Enraged_jawa · · Score: 1

      The oldest running ap, no doubt, is the collective telephone billing and call distribution system. (Runing Unix from the late 70's).

    3. Re:Oldest App, or Oldest RUNNING app... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >>and find the oldest continually running app...

      It just might turn out to be a copy of Novell server

      A friend of mine works for Novell, one of their clients had an IBM server running Novell (I don't know which version) that had not been rebooted in almost EIGHT years. That's no power outages, no crashes, nothing. Says a lot about both the software and the hardware.

  23. Old software... by Warui+Kami · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did some contract work for someone (names hidden to protect the innocent) last year who was using a database package named CornerStone (I think).

    This program was written by the people at InfoGames for internal use in the early 80s and then sold as a product starting in 1984 or so.

    I was called in when his Pentium-class machine he'd been running dos 6.2 on died and he needed either a replacement or the program hacked to run on newer OSes. It turned out that it would not run on FAT32 or NTFS partitions, or in Windows in general due to memory handling, but ran just fine under VirtualPC 5 (MacOS X 10.2) with a <2GB partition.

    Just for kicks, I moved him almost entirely over to the Mac and set up one of his Win95 machines to run it in dos-mode as a back-up. After using it for the last 15 years, I doubt they'll ever change. Inertia in the officeplace is a scary thing.

    1. Re:Old software... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ... named CornerStone ... written by the people at InfoGames ...

      Almost - written by Infocom, the writers of many excellent text adventures, such as Zork.

    2. Re:Old software... by JonRock · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be Infocom Cornerstone. The point was that since Infocom had experience in getting their games to run on many micro platforms, that could leverage that technology into making business products that also ran identically on many platforms. CS was not an internal tool--it was always intended as a product.

      Unfortunately, they underestimated the knowledge of *business apps* that would be necessary to make this work, and the extra costs of expanding the company for this development eventually overwhelmed them. Today we know that the technology for a single development platform that is itself retargeted to host systems can be a product in and of itself. That might have been a way for Infocom to have avoided such a deep commitment to the business environment, although even that road has its share of wrecks.

  24. When Microsoft was open source ... by tetranz · · Score: 1

    Slightly OT but can anyone else remember a typing tutor program by Microsoft written in TRS-80 basic?

    I think its the first MS software I remember. The second would have been Edtasm (edit assembler) for TRS-80.

    1. Re:When Microsoft was open source ... by swb · · Score: 1

      The first MS application I ever remember was TASC (The AppleSoft Compiler).

      IIRC it was two sides of a 5.25 floppy, each side of the floppy holding one of the two compiler stages.

      Of course I never did anything useful with it, other than compiling brickout and being amazed at how unplayable it had become.

  25. Bah by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    We still support dispatching systems that date back to the late 70s. So I guess an HP mainframe doesnt count, but do the dumb terminals that have been replaced with PCs count?

    PC Term or minicom or whatever dos based terminal software got shoved on there when the PC came out.

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I know for a fact that some custom code I wrote in the early 90s is still running. It basically just printed bin labels for an inventory system.

    I know it's a shock to geeks, but a commodore 64 can drive a 1200 baud serial printer just as well as a dual Xeon 2.4 with a jigawig of RAM.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Bah by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I know it's a shock to geeks, but a commodore 64 can drive a 1200 baud serial printer just as well as a dual Xeon 2.4 with a jigawig of RAM.

      Um, the only problem is that the C64 doesn't have a print spooler, and you'd have to write one. Not a big deal, I could probly whip one out in BASIC quick enough, but you'd only have 56K-print spooler in which to store shit for printing. It's not nearly so important whether it can drive the printer, it's more important whether it can queue the jobs. :)

      Not trying to be too anal, but with the C64 Commodore Business Machines dropped the "Business Machines" and sold a gaming platform. Smartest thing they ever did until they let that jackass run off with all the money and the company had to fold. Otherwise, we might be talking about the Amiga monopoly and how bud-ridden that girl is...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  26. DOS databases... by njan · · Score: 2

    One large retail company I worked for as a DBA still used a version of well-known DOS database package which can't have been last updated any later than 1990, and was probably much older. The floor of the office dealing with their product line had an office intercom and klaxon system - so that all of the employees could be informed when they needed to quit the database software (every 10 minutes or so) because the system wouldn't handle multiple users and they needed to syncronise the managed copy with a working copy linked into the store systems. :)

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
  27. how about... by intermodal · · Score: 1

    unix? or DOS? ls and dir have been used for ages both on servers and desktops.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:how about... by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I think the aim was 3rd party apps.

      robi

    2. Re:how about... by intermodal · · Score: 1

      well, i understand that, but such fuzzy semantics are ludicrous. Linux is a kernel, Mach is a kernel, HURD is a kernel, win32 is a kernel. ls is a tool, dir is a tool, excel is a tool, vi and emacs are tools (though emacs is also an OS), Excel is a tool, Photoshop is a tool. cutting it up like this is like the semantics between calling everything done in Perl a script and everything done in C++ a program. I have seen Perl programs that go far beyond what I would consider a script, and C++ things that would qualify as a small script. So without better defined categories, they're going to have to acknowledge that its pure opinion and not fact. Typical for a Michael post.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Also. I thought that perl is a scripting language because it is interpreted and C++ is a programming language because it is compiled? The size of the script or program is not going to change it into one or the other. A three line compiled program is still a program and a 3,000 line interpreted script is still a script.

    4. Re:how about... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      ls and dir have been used for ages both on servers and desktops.

      They're talking about how old your version is, not the program itself. My ls isn't that old. I also added on the GNU color version, which is probably even newer but has no man page.

      > man ls | tail -n 8
      [n spaces removed, per lameness filter]
      STANDARDS
      The ls utility is expected to be a superset of the IEEE Std 1003.2 (``POSIX.2'') specification.

      HISTORY
      An ls utility appeared in Version 5 AT&T UNIX.

      BSD July 29, 1994 BSD

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    5. Re:how about... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Linux is a kernel, Mach is a kernel, HURD is a kernel, win32 is a kernel

      Well, not exactly. Win32 is not a kernel, but an API (originally one of four - Win32, WOW, OS/2 char-mode, and (crippled) POSIX). Win32 OSes have a kernel, of course - VMM in the case of 9x-bases OSes, HAL/NTOSKRNL in the case of NT-based OSes.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  28. My Mom by scrotch · · Score: 1

    My Mom is a paralegal and still uses some DOS word processor on an old 286 with a 5" floppy to type letters and legal stuff. She's got a PC running Windows 98 in the same room, but won't use it. She says she can get a letter printed from the DOS app (wish I knew what it was) before she can get Word open.

    I've always used Macs, and tried to tell her how much easier the GUI the GUI would make everything. (Though I didn't know how to get all of her old files onto the new PC with that tiny 3.5 floppy.) Then I watched her type the 'old way' once - making selections before the screen finished redrawing, spewing out 80 words a minute and printing in a keystroke - and she convinced me. There is no point in newer software for her.

    1. Re:My Mom by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, I've been saying since the first release of Windows 3.0 -- if you're working solely with text, you're going to be better off in a text environment!

      In a way, I think Windows took a step backwards when they eliminated MS-DOS and made Windows the whole OS. I mean, getting rid of the old 16-bit DOS code made sense, but things might have been more flexible if they just put some work into a major DOS upgrade - and made Windows '9x launch from DOS optionally, like Win 3.x did.

      Look at all the work MS had to put into making the DOS compatibility layer run as many older apps as possible. Instead of that, I would have preferred a Win environment with no "DOS commnand prompt" or "DOS box" of any kind. If you want to run DOS apps, you just do it without typing "win" to start Windows up.

      The GUI does make things easier for *desktop publishing*, where you're working with multiple fonts and graphics interspersed with your text. For "typewriter simulating", like most offices still do with their computers, a GUI is just needless overhead!

    2. Re:My Mom by amber_lux · · Score: 1

      uses some DOS word processor on an old 286 with a 5" floppy

      Probably Wordstar. The Wordstar Command set is very extensive, and intuitive. OTOH, I am noted for considering that GUIs are user-hostile, and designed to minimize productivity.

      spewing out 80 words a minute

      At that speed, a GUI will drop her typing speed by between ten and twenty percent. Fifty percent if it is from that crappy company that might one day learn how to write software that works.

      Wind under Thy Wings

      Amber

      --

      Suppose you did.
      Suppose you did not.

    3. Re:My Mom by edwdig · · Score: 1

      Win9x WAS designed exactly like you wished it was.

      Edit MSDOS.SYS and change BootGUI=1 to 0 and you'd get your command prompt on boot, and typing win would start the GUI. Or, download TweakUI off MS's website and get a control panel to make the change.

    4. Re:My Mom by rtscts · · Score: 1

      It's called OS/2.

  29. Oldest Source code i could find ... by Linux+Home+Automatio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's a clip from the comments I found in a program to calculate Sun rise & sun set:

    ** SUN.C Version 1.0 Michael Schwartz December 25, 1984

    I've only modified it slightly to correct for float and double. I still use it in my Home Automation software to calculate Sunrise/Sunset. Hey it works well.

    --
    Linux Home Automation
    http://mywebpages.comcast.net/ncherry/
    http://hcs.sourceforge.net/
  30. Quicken 5 by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    I still run Quicken 5. It's a lot faster and more intuitive than the newer versions, and I don't have to deal with Intuit's new DRM and spyware. I back up the whole program and all 6 years of data on a single floppy.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  31. Is your application running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well you'd better go catch it!

    n00b!

  32. We just stopped using... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    Paradox 4.5 for DOS,
    Lotus 123R3 (DOS),
    We had (up 'til last month) a Win 3.1 machine (a 486) on our network (Great Plains Dynamics for DOS),
    and within the last 3 years have finally killed off the old Novell 3.12 servers (replaced with Novell 5 and 6).

    You want old? We got old...

    1. Re:We just stopped using... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The place I used to work at had a 286 printing bills of lading at the shipping desk.

      If it hasn't broken (and I doubt it has), I'm sure it's still in use today.

      After all, if it aint broke...

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  33. It's SyncSort by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    The oldest commercial application, i.e. one sold as a software product, is SyncSort. SyncSort was one of the very first commercial third-party software applications. It was also the first to be patented. SyncSort, Inc. was formed in 1969.

    SyncSort was the first useful sort program to break the O(N log N) barrier (yes, this is possible, CS101 kiddies). This was a huge win for mainframe shops with their big tape-to-tape sort jobs. That's what all those spinning tape reels were doing on early computers. SyncSort cut days off some batch jobs.

    You can buy current versions of SyncSort. The old versions for IBM mainframes are still available, and you can get it as an Active-X control for Windows. So that's a 34-year old product, little changed in decades and still doing a useful job today.

    I did maintenance programming on a competitive product, UNIVAC Exec II Sort/Merge, around 1969. SyncSort was faster. They really did have a better, and patented, algorithm.

    1. Re:It's SyncSort by HidingMyName · · Score: 1
      SyncSort was the first useful sort program to break the O(N log N) barrier.
      Radix sort has been around for a long time. If it isn't being done using Radix sort, how do they do it (with Willard's Fusion Trees?)
    2. Re:It's SyncSort by Quixote · · Score: 4, Informative
      > SyncSort was the first useful sort program to break the O(N log N) barrier (yes, this is possible, CS101 kiddies).

      Just because it uses radix sort it doesn't mean it isn't O(N log N). The radix itself is O(log N); you have to look at each entry at least once.

      Remember, we're talking theoretical issues here (since you brought up the O(.) notation).

    3. Re:It's SyncSort by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      SyncSort was the first useful sort program to break the O(N log N) barrier (yes, this is possible, CS101 kiddies)

      You're playing with semantics there. No, sorting faster than O(N log N) is not possible. Yes, it is possible to divide a sort into two steps, such as computing a sort key and then doing the actual sort, such that the second of the two steps is less than O(N log N).

      This allows you to save time when repeatedly sorting unchanged records, but saying that you have a faster-than-O(N log N) sort algorithm is a misstatement, because it depends on precomputed keys and you are not taking the time to compute those keys into account.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    4. Re:It's SyncSort by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

      >No, sorting faster than O(N log N) is not possible.

      Sorting faster then O(N log N) is posible. What is NOT posible is sorting faster then O(N log N) while ONLY using the > operation to order elements.

      If you make a program that generate N random numbers between 0 and 56000 sorting them in O(N) will be simple.

    5. Re:It's SyncSort by pclminion · · Score: 1
      No, sorting faster than O(N log N) is not possible.

      Generalized sorting, you are correct. However, it's possible to sort ordinal types (such as integers) in O(N) so long as the range of values is definitely bounded. You just go through the array, increment a counter for each ordinal value you see, then go back again and output the appropriate number of occurrences of each ordinal.

      An extremely special circumstance, but it is O(N) sorting nonetheless.

    6. Re:It's SyncSort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Goddamn kids. There's a bunch of bad information in this thread.

      It's possible to sort in better than O(n log n) time. There are three sorts that perform in O(n) time: counting sort, radix sort (to which other posts refer), and bucket sort. (For the details, get a good algorithms book, like "Introduction to Algorithms by Cormen, Leiserson, and Rivest [yes, the RSA Rivest]).

      There are also a special sorting algorithms for machines with multiple tapes (external sorting). The k-way tape merge and the polyphase sort use multiple tapes to efficiently sort a data set. They were way cool back before you were born. It's entirely possible that SyncSort is the company that invented one of these (although I can't find any information to confirm that).

    7. Re:It's SyncSort by Animats · · Score: 1
      Sorting faster then O(N log N) is posible. What is NOT possible is sorting faster then O(N log N) while ONLY using the > operation to order elements.

      Exactly. ">" loses information, and that costs you. There are better ways that use the value of the key.

      If you make a program that generate N random numbers between 0 and 56000 sorting them in O(N) will be simple.

      Yes. It's easy for well-distributed data. The breakthrough in SyncSort was that it works fast even when the data isn't well-distributed. It's continuously computing statistics on key distribution and changing the way it distributes incoming records into bins on the fly.

      Actual graphs of SyncSort speeds vs. number of records show a curve worse than linear, but better than O(N log N).

      When SyncSort came out, sorting involved many tape drives, even more tapes, and even more tape changing. Big sort runs could take days.

      LOAD REEL 14624 ON 2/7
      WRONG REEL! LOAD REEL 14624 ON 2/7
      LOAD REEL 75349 ON DRIVE 2/9
      LOAD BLANK 2/11
      UNLOAD 2/11 AND LABEL AS SORT-0067

    8. Re:It's SyncSort by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Yep - Syncsort, FDR, etc - third party applications in mainframe. But nothing compared to Ditto from IBM, kind of utility. There are other utilities as old ( or maybe even older ) commonly used in mainframes. My oldest is a sorting, selecting, merging utility ( using for ex. Syncsort as the sort ) year -72, enhanced -74, still used. So - we better classify the oldest by platform, operating system, etc.. have a nice day.

    9. Re:It's SyncSort by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      The worst-case time for any of these algorithms is still O(n log n)

    10. Re:It's SyncSort by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      Turn to page 178 of your Introduction to Algorithms book (if it's the 2001 edition) and tell me what you think of it... (the proof that the lower bound of any deterministic or randomized sort is omega(n lg n) )

    11. Re:It's SyncSort by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      to break the O(N log N) barrier (yes, this is possible, CS101 kiddies).

      No, it isn't. If you have an algorithm that does you should publish it because I know of NONE. You can have a sort algorithm that does better than O(N log N) SOMETIMES, but the O(f(N)) notation refers to the upper bound on the algorithm.

      There are some limits that just can't be broken. It is mathematically provable that you can't do better than O(log N) for N-bit hardware addition or multiplication. I wouldn't be suprised if someone out there has actually proved O(N log N) to be the lower bound for sorting. Just looking at all the values in the sequence is going to be O(N).

      (yes, this is possible, CS101 kiddies)

      No, it's not. You really shouldn't be both insulting and wrong. If you have special information about the data you're sorting, you can do better, but those are special cases. It is incorrect to state that a special purpose algorithm solves the general case. Being old and biased against younger people doesn't make you right. You weren't born knowing anything about sorting, and there's nothing wrong with being in CS101.

      By the time I finished writing this someone has pointed you to a proof that you can't do better. I suggest you read it. You're never too old to learn :)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  34. Strom looks like my Hiigh School art teacher by simul · · Score: 1

    In summary: There's a bunch of people out there who either were too poor, to cheap or never needed to upgrade their software.

    I debugged an DOS/Informix 1.0 system for a shop on Wall Street this year. Did I like it? A bit. But only because it was *new* to me. Teh guy who built it hated it so much that he wouldn't take money from the company to maintain it any more. And with good reason.

    Is that really intresting to anyone? Maybe only for nostalgic technophiles with good fashion sense....

  35. Go outside by teetam · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Go outside USA and you will find tons of such applications still being used.

    Remember, only in the Western world is software/hardware cheap when measured against the cost of living.

    In India, for example, a cheap PC would cost more than what most people earn in a month. I bet there would be many schools and homes with old PCs and software simply because it costs too much to upgrade.

    --
    All your favorite sites in one place!
  36. Wow.... by Stalemate · · Score: 1

    What a way to spend the holidays. I don't think I could stand the excitement...

  37. Why Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As long as you keep up with regular maintence and run the same programs, there is really no need to upgrade. If a program ran good and stable 20 years, excluding any hardware problems, it should run the same on the same old machine. Why waste money just to get a fancier, more appealing interface and countless, annoying, useless options that will never be touched.

    Plus they just don't make them like they used to. I have seen many modern pentium based system come and go (and get chucked in the dumpster), while the 286, 386, and 486 systems still go strong.

    1. Re:Why Upgrade? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      As long as you keep up with regular maintence and run the same programs, there is really no need to upgrade.

      Yeah, I just changed the oil on my old Atari 2600 and fired up pac-man. Talk about the worst massacre of an already shitty game....

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  38. Norton Commander for DOS by Larry_Dillon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not the oldest, but I still put Norton Commander for DOS (circa 1989) on boot floppies. A two pane file browser, an editor and lap-link file transfer in under 80K.

    If I still had an older version, it did most of the same stuff in about 53k. it was from around 1985.

    --
    Competition Good, Monopoly Bad.
    1. Re:Norton Commander for DOS by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      And Total Commander (formerly known as Windows Commander) is a great replacement.

      Norton eventually came out with a windows version, but the viewers were VERY slow, and most of the keyboard shortcuts didn't work. TC/WC is far more like the original NC.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    2. Re:Norton Commander for DOS by UpLock · · Score: 1

      'Norton' Commander was conceived of and written by John Socha, who was Chief Architect at Peter Norton (aka Betty Crocker) Computing and who is justifiably proud of this simple, elegant creation.

    3. Re:Norton Commander for DOS by AlinuxNCSU · · Score: 1

      Word up. Norton Commander was one of the most useful pieces of software I'd ever seen. It was so much more powerful than meets the eye, though. It had a built in menuing system, among other things. In the days when the more pipe was horrible, its file viewer was a Godsend to young kids like me who wanted to learn about every file in the system. Any DOS system without nc was not complete. My first (of very few) forays into piracy was giving copies of nc to anyeone I knew with a new computer.

      When I converted over to Linux, Norton Commander was one of the few pieces of software I saved. When I saw Midnight Commander for Linux, I rejoiced. Unfortunately, it really wasn't the same. NC was powerful because of it's simplicity. Throwing the kitchen sink in just ruined it.

      Fortunately, bash and the graphical tools on all OSes are good enough that I've all but forgotten norton commander. Thanks for bringing up the nostalgia. ;-)

    4. Re:Norton Commander for DOS by rtscts · · Score: 1

      FAR is more like the original NC.. it's text mode, but still Win32 native. Beats the shit out of that eyesore GUI version, IMO...

    5. Re:Norton Commander for DOS by knobbyberry · · Score: 1

      For years, I could not have functioned using DOS (or Win 3.1) without NC.

      Clearly it was getting long in the tooth, and I was fortunate some years ago to run across a SUPERIOR native Win32 app patterned after NC called "Total Commander". It's the only shareware program I've ever registered, and I've gotten far more than my money's worth. Though it's a GUI app, you can drive it totally from the keyboard. It's well maintained, and some new features are still being added. I rate it A+++.

      I wish there was a Linux version of Total Commander. I've tried (and occasionally still use) Midnight Commander, but I'm a Linux newbie, and lack of consistent terminal behavior makes MC operate inconsistently for me. A Linux native GUI version of MC (or Total Commander) would be nice.

  39. Oldest running must be running! by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok I was going to use my final moderator point on this but i found far too many offtopics for me to do it. I do belive the longets running application they are looking for is the LONGEST STILL RUNNING from start to today. Like uptime but just a single application.
    There was reciently the longest running computer hunt and now i suppose they want the longest running application. Im sure its going to be a database or a print or file server of some kind but you never know, someone may still have Word running and they never quit it on their dos machine 10 years ago :)
    I'm sure theres still really old applications in use today but its unlikely they have been running all this time.
    People, Please read the article before you chose to reply.

  40. NT4 Uptime? by de+la+mettrie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One reader sent me screenshots to prove that his Windows NT v4 server is still up and running of 1,079 days with nary a reboot, and being used to serve up IP addresses for about 3,500 client workstations.

    Just the far end of the bell curve? A quick photoshop job on the screenshots? Or... maybe Windows is of some use as a server OS after all?

    1. Re:NT4 Uptime? by Deagol · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'd say it's more a function of the service (DHCP?) than anything. You can't much simpler than DHCP. I'd never expect to see an NT domain controller, file/print server, Exchange, or IIS server make it more than a couple of months without a reboot.

      That's like being proud of a UNIX/Linux server for having a 3-year uptime when all it does is serve ntp queries! The lack of a power interruption is more impressive than the machine staying up.

    2. Re:NT4 Uptime? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Just the far end of the bell curve? A quick photoshop job on the screenshots? Or... maybe Windows is of some use as a server OS after all?"

      My company had a WinNT4 Server with at least 6 months uptime. Sadly we took it down to move offices, so who knows how long it would have lasted. Also, we have Exchange running on NT Server that stays up for months at a time. We're all surprised about that though because the machine has a buggy motherboard (it's a prototype machine) a hard-drive that should fail any day now, and temperature problems. Frankly, even *I* am surprised it's gone on this long. That damn server just won't die!

      To anybody still running NT Server and IIS today, I have a little piece of advice: Install 'URLScan' from MS's site. What it does is it takes a URL request and filters it out based on parameters you define. The idea here is to prevent buffer-overflows by stopping unusual requsets. (For example, why would 'cmd.exe' need to be in a URL?) I installed that (during the Code Red days) and never had to mess with that machine again.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:NT4 Uptime? by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      Hehe...

      Good humor.

    4. Re:NT4 Uptime? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Gee, I guess he missed a security patch or two along the way, eh?

    5. Re:NT4 Uptime? by dobedobedew · · Score: 1

      I have to respond to this. A friend of mine that runs a small shop in a mall has an old file server running NT4 Terminal Server Edition. It's an AT&T Pentium 90 with 128 MB RAM, and two 2 GB Narrow SCSI drives in a software mirror.
      It serves files to five workstations running various flavors of windows, and their DOS-based Point of Sale system.
      Other than the time we physically relocated the shop, it has had two reboots in the five years that it has been in service.
      So, believe it or not, NT4 really can be a reliable server platform. Certainly not most times, but it will occassionally work just fine without ever needing to be kicked.
      BTW, I have a dual PII server running RedHat 7.3 right next to the old server, just waiting to take over for when the NT4 box finally dies. I see no reason in removing it from service if it still runs and works fine.

    6. Re:NT4 Uptime? by transient · · Score: 1

      GIS data server on HP-UX: 1243 days.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    7. Re:NT4 Uptime? by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's more a function of the service (DHCP?) than anything. You can't much simpler than DHCP. I'd never expect to see an NT domain controller, file/print server, Exchange, or IIS server make it more than a couple of months without a reboot.

      I'd be happy to send you a screenshot of an NT4 box showing an uptime of over 600 days. It is used as a SQL server, file/print sharing, and the primary domain server for a small business.

    8. Re:NT4 Uptime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There is no reason a properly configed and secured NT box cant run for greater than a year. It's only 1337 Slatdot types that refuse to believe a decent NT admin can in fact run a NT network with every bit of stability of a UNIX system. The only time I had to reboot a NT box runnng exchange 5.5 and SQL server was to move it. 8 months without the screen even been turned on for one system.

    9. Re:NT4 Uptime? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      In my former life I had a couple of File / DHCP / DC on NT 4 that easily got over 100 days uptime under windows NT 4. The only reason they came down was:

      1. Service Packs.
      2. Power failure.

      So yes, Windows apparantly can run that long. On the other hand my iBook, Linux and Sun boxes regularly outdo that at home.

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    10. Re:NT4 Uptime? by GrubInCan · · Score: 1
      Wait until Server 2003:

      "We're seeing crazy uptime numbers now, like three months, six months" - Jeff Stucky - senior systems engineer on the Microsoft.com operations team.

      Crazy!

  41. Novell 3.x = most stable server ever. by talon77 · · Score: 1

    I am a network consultant, and there are still dozens of 3.2 servers in Omaha that I support. These servers are the most reliable you will ever see, with most of them have over 3 years of uptime without being downed once.. and the last time they were down was because a tape drive failed or another hardware component needed replacing. Netware 5.x/6.x isn't quite as stable, but I'd still but it up against an MS box any day of the week.. Its a shame that developers keep going away from it.

  42. TeX by Submarine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most mathematicians and computer scientists use a program called TeX to typeset their papers. TeX takes a .tex file as input and spits out a .dvi file, which can be postprocessed by drivers to produce PostScript or PDF files. TeX was written by professor Donald Knuth of Stanford University; the current version is still essentially similar to the 1983 version!

    TeX has a horrible syntax and funky limitations, but there are so many available packages for it (such as LaTeX and the associated packages) as well as external applications (BibTeX) and tons of mathematical files made for it that it just cannot be replaced.

    Some crazy people even use TeX to
    typeset a newspaper and a personnel directory.

    1. Re:TeX by larien · · Score: 1
      At my previous job at a university, we had to create about 300-400 accounts a year. What used to happen was that the username/password list was FTP'd to a PC and mailmerged in Word to print out "here is your username and password" sheets. This was very intensive and very annoying as you had to remember how to use mailmerge every September and get it to play nice.

      I rewrote all the user creation scripts while I was there to make it easier to work with and part of that was a perl script to create a LaTeX file (OK, not strictly TeX...) and print it to a laser printer. Made life so much easier to simply run ./print.pl class.out rather than the FTP/mailmerge/print.

      As far as I know, they still use the scripts for user creation; I certainly doubt they've rewritten them.

    2. Re:TeX by evvk · · Score: 1

      > TeX has a horrible syntax

      Syntax? What syntax? The problem with (La)TeX is that the documents are programs where commands may read ahead in the source file--in which way many of the inconsistent "syntax" extensions are implemented--making it difficult to implement e.g. a Latex to HTML converter (as can be seen from the dozens of such attempt none of which work satisfactorily). Disrecarding this difficulty, (La)TeX is really a joy to write unlike (SG|X)ML based formats (or *shudder* using a word processor) which are far too verbose to be edited without special programs that are inferior to good text editors.

    3. Re:TeX by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Speaking of crazy people,
      One or two of my CS professors (about 5 years ago) told us that we should all be using TeX for all our schoolwork.

      I was using emacs for programming, and short docs, and MSWord or AmiPro for longer docs and papers.

      I always looked at them like they were crazy, but they didn't seem to notice.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    4. Re:TeX by Mooncaller · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, there is no satisfactory replacment for TeX.

    5. Re:TeX by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Your CS prof wasn't crazy, he was smart. I resisted using TeX for years, but once I finally gave in and learned it-- originally just intending to use it for math and CS papers, of course -- I realized that it really is the best thing for writing any kind of academic document. If you're writing a novel, sure, use a dedicated word processor. But if you're writing anything that involves citations and divisions into organized chunks, TeX is the way to go.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    6. Re:TeX by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      I KNOW TeX is great (even unrivaled) where you need exact layout of math symbols, formulae, etc., but it would have been a HUGE waste of time for me to try to learn it to write a total of a few dozen 5-10 page documents in my academic career.

      I used to use WordStar to write term papers in High School, and even it seems advanced compared to TeX.

      Of course, now I write (a little) HTML by hand, which is just as bad or worse than TeX, I suppose. :P

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    7. Re:TeX by tbuskey · · Score: 1

      One company I worked at did thier user manual in LaTeX. It was CFD software. Lots of fluid dynamics equations. Graphs, etc.

      Someone wrote a dynamic viewer on unix (SunOS/Irix/AIX/HP-UX) pretty quickly. This was '93.

      Anyways, they decided to change to a new help file format (Windows Help?). This required a translation to word. We had macs and used Word 4 on them. The PowerPC was just coming out.

      This LaTeX document which could be produced on a low end sun. We could probably run it through OzTeX on a Mac SE.

      The word version grew and grew. It consumed the SE. It consumed a Quadra 800. Adding sections/references (lots of them!) was very painful. The file size grew from 1MB to many many megabytes.

      If you want to do scientific docs or have lots of references, etc, LaTeX is very cool. Word sucks.

    8. Re:TeX by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Well, what I meant was that even for non-mathematical papers, the 5-10 page stuff you describe, I've come to love TeX's powers of layout and -- especially -- organization. Citations, cross-references, chapters and sections and subsections, all that stuff. As long as you're working in a good text editor (I use BBEdit) then it's just like working in an old-school word processor (WordStar or WordPerfect, say) only with much more control over the document. Now, granted, a good TeX-based werp, something that gives you some of the goodies but also gives you by-hand control of the formatting on the level of WordPerfect's "reveal codes" feature, might not be a bad thing. I gave LyX a try and wasn't too impressed, but that might turn out to be useful one of these days.

      I also write pretty huge chunks of HTML by hand, so take this FWIW. ;)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:TeX by dprovine · · Score: 1
      TeX can be a pain in the neck, but if you chose to use MSWord instead then you're the one who's crazy. WYSIWYG word processors are basically just perfected typewriters. They've taken out the problems of a typewriter, but haven't advanced a bit. And Beyond just the problem of huge file sizes (my 70-page thesis is only 90K as TeX files), there's the problem of intentionally-obfuscated file formats.

      When I did my thesis, several dissertations available seemed relevant to my topic, but I wasn't going to spend $30 per copy to get them. Most of the authors, found via the web and contacted by e-mail, were happy to send me digital copies. One guy told me that he couldn't read the electronic copies he'd saved, since his computer had been upgraded and the new stuff wasn't sufficiently backward-compatible. If he wanted an electronic copy of his own paper, he'd have to scan it in and then fix up the misreads.

      My wife has used troff for years (she started before TeX existed), and can still read and print and trivially grep through documents well over 20 years old. They've moved across a dozen kinds of hardware and as many flavors of Unix, and all are still 100% usable.

      Using LaTeX is like writing programs instead of doing everything with pencil and paper. It'll take longer now, but over the long run you'll save a ton of time and trouble.

      And, of course, nothing looks as good as what you get from TeX.

  43. different take on longest running.... by laugau · · Score: 1

    I would be more interested in the application with the longest uptime.... that is a GOOD application.

    I aint rebooted that thar database in pert-near 15 years

  44. Law Firms by Scot+Seese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did some work for a law firm a few years ago. They were using an MS-DOS package called "Juris" to handle all their time billing. As you can imagine, this was the #1 priority mission-critical application for them. Juris is allegedly the 800 pound gorilla in the legal sector.

    IIRC, Juris was written in 1986, or something like that. The company that makes it was getting ready to roll out a "test" version now featuring - WINDOWS support. *Gasp!* This was a few years ago.

    I wager that the oldest running application is probably in a factory somewhere, producing something very low tech. Like an 8088 hooked up to a lathe trimming brown rubber toilet plunger bulbs. Those manufacturing guys rarely upgrade, and arguably never need to.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    1. Re:Law Firms by BKX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're are probably more apps like Juris out there than people realize. My dad owns a chain of restaurants and he still uses the same accounting software that he got 15 years ago. Back then he ran it on a 286 with DOS 3.3 but later they released an upgrade so he had to get a 486 with DOS 6.2. Now he's using a Cyrix MX200 with the same HD from the 486 that he's had for something like 8 years. Four years ago the company that makes his accounting software was talking of releasing a Windows version but every one of their clients (supposedly) bitched because how could you enter data quickly if you have to use a mouse. My dad won't switch for that reason alone; instead, he pays $500 a year for updates on the taxforms and whatnot and $10000 every 5-7 years or so for major upgrades. Sounds insane but its the only software that allows a novice to enter 600 invoices in under 2 hours. Try tackling that one Microsoft.

  45. Here's why by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

    so it can read email.

  46. pay at INRIA by Submarine · · Score: 1

    Somebody from INRIA (a computer science institute) told me that their accounting services run an old COBOL program to process the pay. The engineers who wrote the code are now retired...

    1. Re:pay at INRIA by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... and because nobody's left who understands it, unknownst to the company, the original authors still receive their full paycheck in the mail every every week, even though 2 of them are deceased :-)

  47. 7zip by svallarian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you tried 7zip yet? Freeware and handles long file names in dos + has a nice gui version that will handle rar, zip, and lots others.

    Steven V.

    --
    I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
  48. that's nothing by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    i want to know who the oldest living slashdot poster is ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's nothing by DaBj · · Score: 2, Funny
      i want to know who the oldest living slashdot poster is ;-)

      Trick question!
      Slashdotposters don't have lives...
      =)
      --
      "GNU's not Unix....it's Linux" / Kami "kokamomi" Petersen
    2. Re:that's nothing by rapett0 · · Score: 1

      I am 25. :)

  49. Emulation in the future by azpcox · · Score: 1

    System emulators are going to be more and more necessary to run these legacy applications that can't run on new hardware anymore (for whatever reason). Maybe this was why Microsoft snatched up VirtualPC as a way of maintaining their user base by allowing them to run the latest hardware and software as well as their older software in an emulated, but still very usable, mode.

    --
    What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
  50. Embedded software lasts longest by gregor-e · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My oldest still running apps are embedded in products that were introduced in 1983, performing oil and gas well monitoring and control. Solar-powered, Z80 microprocessors, deployed waaay out in the middle of nowhere. I suspect this code will continue to run until the hardware fails or the well runs dry.

  51. Oldest running Apple apps .. that are STILL in use by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting
    One of the things I suppose validated (for Steve Wozniak) the Apple I and lives on in the iPod is the game; breakout.

    But, how old is Visicalc for the Apple II IIe or even I - wasn't it the first app for the Apple or maybe Turtle?

    I believe the date for these programs would be 1977. (Visicalc 1979)

    I know of several college professors at Clemson that use Apple IIe's for milk volume analysis and "calling" the cows in for milking at the Lamaster dairy Agricultural arm of Clemson too. I also know one professor that still uses VisiCalc.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  52. And the rest of the world? by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When I was working in Mexico in the mid-90s as an independent consultant one of my clients (a small hospital in northern Mexico) had an application that they used to track patient payments. I'm not sure what it was based on, maybe dBase? Anyway, it used some sort of database. But it's possible it was propietary.

    This was 1994-ish and the IT guy there told me that they had been running that thing for about 7 years. That means it had been in use since '87 or so.

    About four months ago I got an email from one of my old subcontractors, who is now employed full time at that hospital (which is not small anymore). His note was unrelated to this application, which I did not touch or otherwise use. He was asking me somethng about one of the other systems I did work on there. But he mentioned it in passing, and I just remembered when I saw this article.

    So that means that they've been using it for the better part of 15-16 years.

    When you're third world, you tend to keep stuff around until it breaks =)

    1. Re:And the rest of the world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hi. Second-world refers to, or at least used to refer to, the Soviet bloc. Third-world was a term used for countries that were neither allied with the Soviets nor members of NATO. Just thought you'd like to know.

    2. Re:And the rest of the world? by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      At my university's (Tartu University, Estonia) library building, there are a group of assorted (vt220, vt510 etc) terminals, mostly used for email access and mudding. One of them (I don't know the type) has exactly the look of a TV-typewriter - small black and green screen, and a keyboard that feels like exactly like an old typewriter. It's like out of the movie "Brazil"... I have no idea how old it may be, but judging by the look it's definately over 20 years. As there weren't too many mainframes around here and those that existed have all probably been disassembled, it may as well be (one of) the oldest running pieces of computer hardware. I doubt whether there's any older Soviet computers running around here.

      As for software, then last year in an AI class we were demonstrated the 'product' of a voice synthesizer program dating back to late 1970's or early 1980's. The audio file was quite new, but I don't know whether it was ripped from an audio tape or freshly made - the voice was speaking Russian with a terrible Estonian accent :D

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  53. I win by blitzoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have an ancient Abacus that was bought from an medievel marketplace - and I still use it to do my business tax!

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
  54. Oh, man... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    do I feel old at the mention of "PIM"...those were gaining popularity when I got into computers (1993'ish) while in college.

    About 5 years back (maybe longer) I worked for a company that moved off an HP 1000 for their cad/cam and accounting/payroll for the sewing plant.

    Know what finally did the HP 1000 in? Not backups, not parts, not software or ability to function...but politics!

    (sigh) {
    Was a few more paragraphs that got eaten from clicking a link in my mail client...frack! grrr!}
    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  55. "Oldest" type stuff by dark&stormynight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Speaking of "oldest" tech things...it would be interesting to find out what the oldest telephone number in continuous use in the US is or the oldest email address.

    1. Re:"Oldest" type stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The oldest telephone number in consistent use is "0" for operator

  56. Atari 800 by Lonath · · Score: 1

    I know someone who still does word processing on an Atari 800... :) She's using it to write the manuscript for a book that will be published. That's probably older than most other things, but I don't know when those Atari 800's first came out.

  57. Re: Good for your dad! by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sometimes, it really does amaze me that the computer industry is so worked up over what to do with recycling of old systems and all the computers getting thrown in the garbage - yet they act like getting more use out of the older ones isn't possibly an option.

    I'm currently working for a small company that reclaims and refurbishes old Apple Mac systems (everything from the black and white 9" screen SE's and Classics to the first generation of PowerMacs). People give the things to us for free all the time, since they're written off as useless junk. In fact, we're able to get them configured as pretty nice little "starter" systems for students, small children, and public-access machines for the elderly in retirement homes.

    Some of the best "classic" games and educational titles of all time ran on these computers, and there's no reason a 3 or 4 year old kid today won't find them just as exciting as kids did back when these machines first came out!

    Remember Oregon Trail? How about KidPix, Print Shop Deluxe, Lode Runner, Prince of Persia, and all the Scholastic educational games/software?

    For the older folks, there's plenty of great freeware and shareware: monopoly, GNU chess (who even needs a color screen for chess?), backgammon, card games, Shanghai (the matching tile game), and much more.

    Claris Works runs quite well on the old Macs too, and gives students a real inexpensive solution for typing papers, not to mention simple spreadsheets.

    At some point in time, I plan on putting together a nice system build for old DOS machines too, full of kids' games and educational titles - and see if we can't give some old 8088's and 286/386 machines a new life too.

    Those old systems were built like tanks compared to what's offered today. Look at how heavy a real IBM keyboard (or machine) is! Small children aren't going to break one of those as easily as they will some cheap eMachines mini-tower.

  58. MCS map contouring system - ealier than 1969 by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    Scientific Computer Applications incorporated out of Tulsa OK might be a candidate. They handle the MCS coutouring program and this is still one of the best applications of its type even today. I am pretty sure it was available before 1969. I tried to call then to confirm the date of its first release but they were not in. Friday aft - go figure eh?

  59. Oldest Process? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    I think KeyKos used to claim that they had the longest running process. Of course, this isn't fair, because their processes can outlive power and equipment failures. Still, interesting and relevant.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  60. Find the oldest hardware... by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    First find the oldest running hardware platform, then you might find the oldest software.

    I would think that NASA use some very old hardware and software.

  61. Not real old, but old enough... ~1987 by armus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we have an invoicing program (DOS) for a garment business from around 1987. to this day, we still use it but have subsequently moved on to a window's based program. this DOS program now runs on wink2k boxes. i had to modify the autoexec.bat and config.sys files for it to work. LOL it's a pretty solid program... we have less problems with that one than we do with the windows program. (prob due to less features and no 'window's programing...) (now i'm reminiscing about the old DOS days.. mmmmm..) -armus

  62. Tandy 102 by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Here at my desk I have a Tandy 102, circa early 1980's (NOT my primary machine). Its OS is by Microsoft, and is reported to contain the last production code BillG personally worked on. A few K of RAM, a few K of ROM, and an 8(I think) line, 40-column screen. You can see some of the bad ideas which were stolen from CPM and enshrined in DOS, like 8.3 filenames (files in RAM) and the three letter filename extension gives file type.

    It still works, and its spreadsheet easily uses relative cell references. That nifty little feature seems to have gotten lost in MS's spreadsheets between then and now. Today, one of my cow orkers needed to do something in a spreadsheet ... ``relative references!'' I told him. Half an hour later, none of us could figure out how to do it in Excel.

    Sometimes, the old stuff is good enough to warrent putting up with its limitations. In this case, maybe not. But MS's spreadsheets have gone way downhill since the early '80's.

    1. Re:Tandy 102 by jonfelder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Excel's default behavior is to use relative references. Are you using the correct terminology? If you copy a calculation from one cell in excel to another it will use a relative reference for the calculation.

      Excel also does absolute references...you just put a $ in front of the column and row number (i.e. a1 becomes $a$1).

  63. Air Traffic control by doghouse41 · · Score: 1

    There is the UK air traffic control systems, which were based on 1960-era systems.
    This doesn't quite count as they were replaced by new state of the art systems last year. I hear that they may even have finished debugging the new systems ;-)

    1. Re:Air Traffic control by akb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US Federal Aviation Administration is the largest purchaser of vacuum tubes in order to run our air traffic system. Is that scarier than shoe bombers or what?

  64. Kermit Sprang to Mind by HidingMyName · · Score: 1

    It may not be the oldest, but it was a very popular terminal emulation/file transfer tool back in the day. I still think Kermit may be used by some sysadmins and folks on modem based connections (although kermit has a lot more features).

    1. Re:Kermit Sprang to Mind by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Kermit is still being actively developed. So I'd say that it most likely still used by quite a few people.

  65. NetWare 2.x anyone? by mj01nir · · Score: 1

    I migrated my last NetWare 2.2 client late last year (still on the original 286 hardware). Surely someone is still running NW2.x somewhere!

    --
    the no .sig .sig
  66. Factories are probably the ticket by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    I once had to show up in a chocolate factory where they were running some old Citrix server on NT4 terminal server edition, with some old industrial server serving a special serial interface for packaging boxes onto a pallet and wrapping the whole stuff in plastic. The hardware problem was pretty interesting as the chips the stuff was running on were actually some 6502 and some old UARTs I remember vividly to be found on old ISA serial cards. I luckily had one of these in my stocks, coming from ole Amiga days. A few solder operations later, I turned on that old box, and lo behold, it was running CP/M, with a copyright notice from 1982. I asked the guy in charge if he was not afraid the hardware would break one day and that it would be irreplacable. Upon this question, he lead me down into the cellar and showed me five fresh PCs of the same time, with the batteries removed so they could not leak! They were still on their first industrial 6502 controller box!

  67. They need a decent Novell admin! by acoustix · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article: "They can't really upgrade their NetWare servers because they have production applications that run on the older versions, you know, those older versions that still make use of IPX, a protocol that Novell has moved away from. Their clients are all a mishmash and need to be refreshed, but they figured they would wait until they could roll out a new version of Windows. Plus, to make matters worse, there was a period of about a year when they didn't have anyone on staff who really knew Novell"

    Novell has not moved away from IPX. It has been and still will be supported in future versions. I'm teaching 6.0 and it still uses IPX/SPX for several functions. They need an admin with a clue!

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  68. Re:Don't you remember? by CommandNotFound · · Score: 1


    "60% new code!"

  69. Re: Good for your dad! by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    it seems that the latest programs are not necessarly better. Who rembers running Wordstar on an 8bit system using CPM ? (64k Ram , but only 56K for programs)

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  70. Oldest hardware for modern use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This definately is not the oldest running software, as it was written only a few months ago, but it surely makes old hardware useful in a "modern" sense: The Contiki desktop OS for 80's 8-bit microcomputers like the C64, the 8-bit Ataris, Apple ][, etc. It features a full Internet suite, complete with TCP/IP stack, web browser and web server! Wonder what the world would have looked like if we'd had software like this back then...

  71. Neumann still uses a Commodore PET by burris · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I visited Neumann in Berlin and they used a Commodore PET and some ancient software to measure the frequency response of microphones in their anechoic chamber. This was several years ago but I believe they still use it.


    They also used a 40+ year old measurement microphone to calibrate it.


    burris

  72. I had to by a 286 by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a 286 PC on Ebay. It has a hardware card for controlling racks of slide projectors. (Remember those old bajillion projector slide shows in the '80s? I still make those.) The software that drives the card (VER5 from AVL) is from September 1981.

    Unfortunately, I have since discovered that nobody sells 5.25" floppies any more. Good thing there's 30MB left on the hard drive. That should last a lifetime!

    1. Re:I had to by a 286 by ashitaka · · Score: 1
      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  73. old Mac Plus 1MB by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    screenshot of something not real old... 1987. Still works.

  74. old program by Sarin · · Score: 1

    I had to hack a program a while ago, which was the main database program of a psychologist my father knew. The guy who made the program died right after the first rerun of dukes of hazard.
    It took me more time to access the 180kb 5.25" disk than it took me to fix it using a hex-editor and changing the values for their adress and phone info.

    1. Re:old program by SamBeckett · · Score: 2, Funny

      wtf.... why do you associate someone's death with dukes of hazzard reruns??

      I hope when I die, someone says....

      "SamBeckett died right after the 30 year aniversery of Futurama rerun on Tuesday night right after Geriatric Friends"

  75. I could have been a contender by dbk25 · · Score: 1

    Back in the 1980's, I wrote a few programs that performed back-office calculations for a major Wall Street brokerage firm. The earliest of those ran in (??? ZDS ???) Basic under CP/M on Northstar Horizons. Those programs were used daily for many years, possibly into the 1990's. If they had held on a bit longer (and thank goodness they were retired and replaced by modern tools), but if they had, they might have been in the running. Interesting days, back then.

  76. On a similar note... by mivok · · Score: 1

    what about the computer with the longest uptime ever (both still running and longest that isnt still running)?

  77. Because sometimes there is a better way by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The situation I always like to bring up is libraries. A perfectly aceptable method for doing research that worked for year and years was card catalogues and physically searching through journals. You can still do it, there is no reason why it doesn't work. However, it is MUCH more efficient to have a computer do the search for you, and better still if the whole journal is electronic so you can do full text searches, and just download the article straight to your computer.

    Our university has done this. The physical card catalogue has been completely eliminated, all searches are electronic now. Also, while there are still floors of physical journals, many of the popular ones are available in PDF format for download.

    It is amazing how much more efficient it makes research. It's even better because I can tie it in to databases of things that aren't even contained in this particular library.

    Some times people get so caught up in the fact that the way they do something "works just fine" that they miss the fact that there is a much more efficient way to do it.

    1. Re:Because sometimes there is a better way by chiph · · Score: 1

      Card catalogs and electronic indexes are both worthless when faced with one of my former roommate's research technique. He would plagiarize from a book or journal, then intentially misfile it on another floor so he wouldn't get caught.

      Now, if each book had had a RFID chip in it...

      Chip H.

  78. Old source by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is not running the software, but I am stil intermittenlty patching code whose copyringht statement at the head (written by me) says "Copyright 1984. We still have users of that software, they still find bugs with new hardware, we still fix them. Admittedly, that 1984 software is not much in use, but 1994 software is still definitely mainstream support (the article regards Win98 as incredibly old).

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  79. It's at SAC running on a CDC 11 bit Cyber ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    PRAY_WE_GO_THERE:
    MOV _PTR_INCMING_SOVIET_WARHEAD_CNTR, A
    MOVB (A), B
    TESTB B, B
    JE PRAY_WE_GO_THERE
    CALL _RETALIATE
    RET

  80. I always liked... by Grog6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...going into radio Shack and typing

    10 Print "Shit!";
    20 Goto 10

    and walking away.

    later, that evolved into:

    10 Print "Fuck You!!";
    20 y$=inkey$:if y$="" OR y$"" then 10

    which basicly grabs the 'break' from the buffer before it can be processed, requiring a reboot to clear.

    Adding the line (before executing) :

    basica fuck.bas /r

    to the autoexec.bat ran the program from boot.

    Truly evil, we were.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:I always liked... by salimma · · Score: 1
      Adding the line (before executing) :

      basica fuck.bas /r

      to the autoexec.bat ran the program from boot.

      Truly evil, we were.


      Now we know how they got the idea for using to skip config files...
      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    2. Re:I always liked... by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on, that's no fun. We used to go into Best Buy and others of the like. On the computers, we'd pop up a command prompt and type the following...

      del command.com
      debug
      a100
      mov ax,40
      mov ds,ax
      mov word ptr [1234], 72
      jmp ffff:0000
      [CR]
      rcx
      10
      n command.com
      w
      q
      exit

      For those of you kiddies, this replaces the command processor with a program that reboots the computer. It was so fun just to leave it and go away. The next time the computer is rebooted, it magically continues rebooting itself. You can't break out of it without a startup floppy.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    3. Re:I always liked... by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least you weren't destructive. My little brother's friends made a sport of playing with peek and poke commands to torch in-store display phosphors.

    4. Re:I always liked... by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

      How did you tear yourself away from torturing small animals long enough to waste your time on this sort of thing?

    5. Re:I always liked... by Tri0de · · Score: 1

      I just liket to change the prompt to

      Formatting C..........complete

      and watch the carbon based lifeforms freak out.

      --
      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
    6. Re:I always liked... by rve · · Score: 1

      Nerd!

    7. Re:I always liked... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1
      "Truly evil, we were."

      If you wanted to put more load on the hardware, you could always have used:
      10: mode(int(rand * 16))
      20: goto 10
      Nothing like listening to a monitor's circuits clicking away trying to keep up.
    8. Re:I always liked... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too. But I have started doing something a little more sporting. Break the "you cant touch this computer. You gotta watch this demo" protection on the l4me b0x3n down at the local CompUSA/Best Buy/whatever and trying to get a copy of UD a distributed computing client running. Fun and useful. More useful than wasteing clocks on demos. I have tryed to get them to run this stuff on their own, but all I got was blank looks... and they are supposed to be a computer store. Cracks me up... So I help 'em along.

  81. We are finally getting rid of WPDOS 5.1!! by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    65 lawyer firm.

    So why are we using WordPerfect?

    Simple answer: Bills. The 20-year old accounting system and the groddy macros used to create the client-specific bills requires it. (All other documents are produced on Word 2K)

    With the rollout of a new accounting system the need for WP will be gone and 60 legal secretaries will sigh in relief.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  82. Mac Toasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Bank of America (used to be SeaFirst) here in Seattle still has some branches with Mac toasters on everybodies desks. Everybody is hard at work and has external drives underneath them. I can only imagine they either use some priprietary software or just use them for terminals.

  83. Re: Good for your dad! by nomel · · Score: 1

    I used to spend HOURS playing load runner on my Apple IIC when I was a kid! That game was awsome.

  84. Obsolete & online by obtuse · · Score: 1

    The truly obsolete are likely not to be online. If they're still using... Say original Lotus123 or something older, it's likely that they are keeping what works, but may not bother reading e-info.com. How do you reach out to them? Massive newspaper classified ad campaign? Radio advertising? Maybe we should put the message on Pogs or Burma Shave signs.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  85. Still have Draw Poker! for my 2001 PET by Graemee · · Score: 1

    My original 1978 copy of Draw Poker! for the Commodore PET 2001, still works on my PET.

    Since the tape came with the PET maybe this is a rare orginal software & hardware combo LOL.

  86. Hypercard (don't laugh) by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    I bought a Mac SE a few years ago just to run Hypercard. I've got 2.2 and still have the floppies. 1993

    Never did get around to doing what I planned with it.

  87. Time marches on by SunPin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still play Nuclear War (1989) and I think Project Space Station (1987) was one of the best strategy games ever--a precursor of RTS. But I am addicted to multi-tasking and I am quite fond of the research efficiency gains you point out.

    Most people don't need to upgrade and become a slave to hype. I'm running everything off a 800 MHz system (4 years) and I intend to squeeze the last drop of energy out of it(8 years or more). I'm not on a more modern system or OS because Mr. Bill Gates slammed the door on my Dragon Dictate system... a 1997 discrete speech program that doesn't get along with XP.

    Why would people upgrade these days? High quality RAM, a decent video card and a decent hard drive will handle everything for people that don't give a flying fsck about games and are mature enough to just stay put. I'll probably get a flat panel monitor within the next couple years but that fits with one of my subobjectives--don't get a PC that consumes so much power that it burns my house down.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Time marches on by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Heh, that sounds like me. I keep what I like and what works in hardware and software, and I don't really give a flip if it's new, old, or which-era-did-you-say-this-was??

      My if-all-else-fails emergency machine is a 286 (it does everything I absolutely can't live without, and my better UPS will run it for two solid hours). The oldest utils I still use on every machine are WAITN.COM, to wait n-tics (1983) and CalTech's File Modify, a hex editor (1985).

      My newest machine is a P3-550 (not quite at the end of its life cycle -- CPU and HD can be upgraded) and since it's stable and does everything I ask it to, there's no real reason to rush out and buy a new one. Same with software. WP5.1 for DOS is still my everyday workhorse. I prefer Netscape 3.04 to newer browsers. I get some of my email thru a BBS. My gaming machine is a P233. I feel like a cave man. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Time marches on by onepoint · · Score: 1

      I recal in 1983, my favorite game on my c-64 was a nuke plant simulation. I got real good and could reach 95 to 100% output for hours at a time.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    3. Re:Time marches on by SunPin · · Score: 1

      After I got RDRAM with my current system, I realized that I would be able to keep this machine for a long time. All my systems, going back to my PCJr and XT are still being used by people.

      As computers consume more energy and parts (like Dell drives from IBM/Fujitsu) become total crap, it's not likely that we'll see an article like this in 10 years about today's systems. I hope I'm wrong but I doubt it.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    4. Re:Time marches on by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Most of my systems are built from other people's castoffs (including a P2 and a P3, what is the world coming to already?! and a friend just found a Celeron 800 on the curb on trash day!), and I have a couple clients with no money whose systems use parts from my scrap pile. I see no reason to trash something that can still be useful -- it's not like it eats much in the meantime! I still have a working XT myself, tho it's not been used since it was needed to Y2K test a utility some while back.

      Dell is using Fujitsu/IBM drives? Great, talk about designed to fail! :( Yeah, I'm sure today's latest and greatest will be the museum pieces of the next decade -- and certainly, there will be people who need or want that system of the future. But for most, it's like computers have become a consumable.

      One really odd thing I've seen over and over, is that when people get a new computer, they feel like they *must* get rid of the old one, and all their old software, even if they liked it better. It's as if they think there's only enough magic smoke allotted to each household to keep one machine running.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  88. Re: WP5.1 and TeX by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    People who like the ability to tinker with formatting codes in WP will probably LOVE to use LaTeX. At least that's how it's happened for me. I used WP5.1 on DOS (on a 286) for a long time, then had a brief interlude with Windows 3.1 Word 2.0, until finally discovering the joys of Linux and LaTeX.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  89. Re:How about you? -Yardi Property Mgt- by rmarquis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, it's not me, it's my dad, but he bought an Apple //c for his real-estate office in 1983 and still uses it to keep track of the rental properties he owns.

    My wife and I figure that a fairly simple spreadsheet would probably do the trick these days, but he won't part with it. As he argues (and I can't find fault with it, really), it works, so why mess with it...

    I'd have moved him to AppleWin long ago if I still had the bits and pieces I needed to transfer the disk images, but alas...

  90. MORE 3.1 on Mac OS X by oaklybonn · · Score: 1
    I use Symantec MORE 3.1 (1991) on Mac OS X almost every day. Its my preferred note taking application. I've been using MORE since MORE 2.0 in 1988. MORE 3.0 probably still works, but I paid for the 3.1 upgrade and damnit I'm going to use it.

    I'm sure lots of PC apps still work, but then again, the PC architecture hasn't really advanced in that time.

  91. Character is important. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From the article: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." And that's as correct as anything I've ever heard.

    Here at my job, we have such a mixture of different computers dating from the '70's to just two months ago. To squeeze every possible bit of value out of the money we spend, this company has never put a computer out of commission, partly because doing so could wreak havoc on our system, considering how ad hoc it is, characteristic of things that started out small and then grew, and grew, and grew. That's how our network is... and nobody around here is brave enough to make drastic changes.

    Besides, we've got a huge investment in various software packages and custom programs that translate data between them. These run on so many different hardware configurations and operating systems that it isn't even funny.

    In fact, the way some computers are attached to each other is funny... there are the old coaxial cables, there are newer cat5 cables, there are RS232 cables and "LapLink" cables. Hell, there are even little boards that one of our guys here built in his garage some years ago, to get some of our older dinosaurs communicating. Each of these things was put into place one by one, to solve a very particular short term problem, each turned into a very permanent part of our organization, and all are still functional and are being used extensively.

    There are a bunch of newer boxes here, made out of computer scraps that people have "donated" over the years, running Linux, and in my spare time I like to write scripts to automate all kinds of repetitive tasks. I like the way our network is because it gives the thing a lot of character, kind of like old towns have, as opposed to cities that are engineered onto a huge grid. And I like to think of this network as a town in the wild west... It's so much fun to screw around with these petty things, but then, we all bring our junk cars and old hot rods into work on the weekends to fix them, or to take parts off and sell them; we all have this way of doing petty little shit all the time, and believe me, we love every moment of it!

  92. Re: Good for your dad! by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 1

    I do. I remember typing assignments on an Epson PX-8 with that, with an 80x8 screen. I often look back on it, and I think I would prefer using the PX-8, except it can't do TeX.

  93. RE: I would have loved to reply dbase3. by fshalor · · Score: 1

    Dbase3 can't even deal with years. And NO ONE ever gets paid more than ONCE a month in Dbase's world. :)

    If we ever turn on our annuls experiment, the code was written mostly in the 70's-80's. Should still work. I think it's all in a drawer full of punch cards. It worked when it was last used and has been kept in condidition.

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  94. Apple ][e/Reading s/w by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    A small, private school I support is still running Apple ][e's with some reading software on them. Luckly, my boss is an Apple packrat and has greedily collected any old Apple (Mac or what-not) that the local public school system has gotten rid of.

    Personally, I have a Mac Plus (1 MB RAM) running Minix, booting off of an old 20MB drive. I fire it up from time to time for fun.

    My Quadra 650 (64MB RAM) is still fired up to scan things. This machine has been rock solid, running my orginal copy of Photoshop 2.5, Quark 3.11, Illustrator 5.5. I have a customer that runs an identical system to put out a 50 page monthly newsletter. He doesn't see any need to change things.

    In the closet is my Ti 99/4A with 16k of RAM. The cassette player still works with it and I've loaded up a vector drawing program I wrote in basic (enter x,y screen coordinates for line end points). I used this to draw ships for Traveller. I also had the obligatory character generator for both D&D and Traveller. It's been about 4 years since I last ran this stuff. Hope it still works.

    Current Mac is a 5 year old beige G3 that's been upgraded to a 450MHz G4, dual video (20" Colorsync's) running the latest OSX. Nice that the old hardware holds up so well. Have started looking for a G4 AGP board for my next machine, though. Quartz extreme only works on AGP cards :(.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  95. Insurance claim reserve accounting circa 1961 by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I was until recently charged with, albeit rarely, running a FORTRAN insurance claim reserve accounting program originally written in 1961. The only major mod was a conversion in 1984 from card to tape input.

  96. The LEO, redux by sysjkb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apropos of the Leo mentioned in a previous slashdot story.

    I saved this post from alt.folklore.computers in 1998. Terribly impressive. I'm not sure his age estimate is neccessarily accurate -- the final incarnation of the Leo ceased to be manufactured in the latter half of the 60s, so it may be a bit younger.

    On the other hand, I wouldn't put it past some organization having been forced to make something like the orange leo y2k compliant.

    Yours Truly,
    Jeffrey Boulier

    From: Deryk Barker (dbarker@camosun.bc.nospam.ca)
    Subject: Re: Multics
    Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers, alt.os.multics
    Date: 1998/11/09

    Peter H. Coffin (hellsop@execpc.com) wrote:
    : Barry Margolin wrote:
    :
    : > For that matter, how many portable OSes have been implemented by *anyone*?
    :
    : The most current OS/400 (v4r3) will still run programs compiled on the
    : System 38 tranparently. That's 10-15 year old object code over at least
    : one complete architecture change. The machine also has a history of
    : being able to run in System 36 mode, over that same architecture change.
    :
    : I'm not sure if that counts as a ported OS or not, and I do work for
    : IBM, so I'll stop now...

    Peanuts.

    When my wife was working for Honeywell, in the 1980s, one of the
    customers she had dealings with was British Telecom.

    BT, at one location, had what they called the "orange Leos".

    Now, for those who don't know this, the LEO was the world's first-ever
    commercially-oriented machine (1951). Even more amazingly, the Lyons
    Electronic Office was designed and built by the J Lyons company,
    best-known as manufacturers of cakes and for their nationwide chain of
    corner tea shops.

    Anyway, an "orange Leo" was an ICL 2900 mainframe (they came in orange
    cabinets), emulating an ICL 1900 mainframe, emulating a GEC System 4
    mainframe emulating a LEO.

    30+ year old executable code over 3 architecture changes....

  97. Theyre all DOS programs by mnmn · · Score: 1

    This kinda makes DOS the champion. Even todays BIOS updates are distributed on DOS floppy disks. Care to buy a tokenring card made in 2003? The driver disk supports DOS among others.
    Before DOS there was BASIC, but BASIC programs unfortunately werent interchangeable much. A commodore64 program wouldnt run on a BBC. DOS and the x86 architecture were the first hardware and OS standards that crossed the threshold. Today, Intels releasing the Itanium, but making sure the 32-bit x86 emulation works well. Microsofts releasing Windows 2003, which will still run DOS apps.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  98. LP. by Kwiik · · Score: 1

    I can see it now. Lawsuites, all over the place. "They forced me to upgrade my software, and therefore my hardware by officially proclaiming my software the oldest...it was so embarassing" "They required us to change to newer technology. New operating systems *cough*tryingnottosayit*cough* new coke vending drivers, new everything! It cost my company millions in productivity." "I walk down the isle of cubicals and all I could see was solitair! It's horrific! Before it was too inconvenient for the employees to lay the cards out on their desktop, but now they have more pixels!" One satisfied employee: "u c the pc wuld crash 5 mins after i load my programs anywho. i'm better playing solitair. watch my time go DOWN!!" This is a sad state in corperate affairs..

    --
    Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    1. Re:LP. by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      mod parent up for funny

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    2. Re:LP. by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      mod parent down for troll (same person as the parent asked to be modded)

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
  99. Most used older utility in our shop: by alecto · · Score: 1

    IEFBR14, the program that does nothing.

    1. Re:Most used older utility in our shop: by IEFBR14 · · Score: 1

      It does nothing, but does it very well!!

    2. Re:Most used older utility in our shop: by alecto · · Score: 1

      Love the username :).

  100. PDP-11 by Roarkk · · Score: 1
    The company that I work for still does third party maintainance on quite a bit of older DEC equipment, mainly VAX's. When I first started, I was amazed at the amount of space that was taken up by VAX 6000's. I thought I'd seen the most ancient still-running hardware in existence.

    Imagine my shock when we received a call the other day from a manufacturing plant in Tennessee to ask if we could repair their old PDP/11+RA81 (a huge ~300MB hard drive) system. The worst of it was that my boss ran in back and pulled out two working spares!

    1. Re:PDP-11 by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      No.. sad is I had one my my garage (complete Vax system actually 11/730 sound right?) just a few years ago. The 20 temrinals took up alot of space too. Never did have the boot tape...

    2. Re:PDP-11 by hughk · · Score: 1
      PDP's were relatively low tech but had some excellent software such as MUMPS (a database-RAD system, much loved in the health sector) and RSX-11S/M/M+ which seemed to do well for real time. At one stage you would find these boxes hidden away in all kinds of control systems. Although Digital later produced true microprocessors, which were PDPs on a chip, they were too expensive and too late.

      If you want real fun, look at the +5v bus-bars inside a VAX 6000 through 9000. They were big and exposed. Engineers must remove wrist watches etc. whilst working inside the thing.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  101. Mainframes forever by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Finding the oldest mainframe app still in use would be very difficult. I first learned to program on an IBM 360 mainframe, back in the 70s. (This platform still lives, both as backward-compatible IBM systems and as various emulators.) I seem to recall that the most widely used interpreter for the 360 was a program that emulated the IBM mainframe that dominated the business market before the 360 was introduced. Presumably there was a nested interpreter for the platform before that. It would not suprise me if some machine language program hand-coded by Grace Hand or Alan Turing is still running somewhere, in nested-nested-nested compatibility mode.

  102. a funny semi-on-topic thought by perlchild · · Score: 1

    While only reading the headline, and not the exchange, I was sure the winner was going to be the Internet, although the change in name from "ARPANET" to "Internet" might disqualify it in some minds...

    After all, the whole of the network, per se, was never to my knowledge, entirely offline all at once(although my memories of the first Great Internet Worm are dim, and might be misleading) and if one has a broad view of "application" wouldn't the tcp/ip suite of protocols and the protocols built on them conceivable as a single application or set of applications, whose person is to communicate(aka exchange information, whose value is arbitrary) ?

    Thoughts on this, if constructive, appreciated

  103. Re:I bet you never thought of this by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    How about 'sh'?

  104. MSC.Nastran by YoDave · · Score: 1

    Before joining the 200? version convention, MSC.Nastran had versions in the low 70's

  105. Re:no mouse == good by BKX · · Score: 1

    I remember InterSex (or something like it). Some kid gave it to me in sixth grade. I ran it on my hand-me-down 286 (which I learned how to use in 6 months without a reference or a GUI three years earlier. Imagine learning DOS commands by randomly typing in command looking things. Took a month to figure out the filesystem structure and what dir and cd did by brute force. Man, that was a long time ago.) Unfortunately my mom found the game and threw the computer away. I was pissed as hell. Two weeks later, she bought me a top of the line 486 with 4MB RAM, 250MB HD, Win 3.1 and a ProAudioSpectrum 16 with onboard SCSI-1. I wish I hadn't sold that soundcard; it was best I have ever used.

  106. Oregon Trail by bwags · · Score: 1

    As a Middle School computer teacher, kids still love the old oregon trail game by MECC. I remember that one from my Apple ][+ days as a 7th grader. Ahh... the classics.

  107. Re:no mouse == good by Uerige · · Score: 1
    Imagine learning DOS commands by randomly typing in command looking things.
    Oh yes, the good old times. I remember that when I started doing all these things I did not understand more than maybe ten words of English. That way, I learned both the English language and how to use a computer...
    Anyone remember the MS-DOS 'help' command? MS-DOS is the best documented OS I've seen until today. Maybe there were only 30 executables on the system, but every single on was very well documented...
  108. the rest of the story? by DuctTape · · Score: 1
    I'm waiting for the other half of this story: did you marry her? Take her to the prom? Uh, get a cold turn-down to the popular pick-up line of that era?

    DT

    --
    Is this thing on? Hello?
    1. Re:the rest of the story? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      Sorry to disappoint, but she moved later that year. No prom, no 2.5-kids-and-a-dog. I don't think I showed her my programming prowess. (How geeky do you think I am? Wait, don't answer that)
      Again I say: It was the 3rd grade, what did you expect?

      --

  109. Ancient and Gothic... by simong · · Score: 1

    According to their website The Sisters of Mercy still use ruggedised portable 486s running DOS 3.3 and Voyetra Sequencer Plus to power Doktor Avalanche for live shows. Sequencer Plus was first released in about 1987. They claim it's only crashed twice.

  110. Re:no mouse == good by benzapp · · Score: 1

    ProAudioSpectrum 16 with onboard SCSI-1. I wish I hadn't sold that soundcard; it was best I have ever used.

    Those things were great. I remember comparing it to a Sounblaster 16... The SB16 looked like it had been constructed from radio components purchased from the rat shack, numerous huge capacitors, random layout. The Pro Audio Spectrum had a tight layout, mostly on chip components... AND the SCSI-1 connector like you said.

    Ahh the memories.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  111. APL by michael_cain · · Score: 1
    It's not a commercial app, but I still use, on an almost daily basis at least as a calculator, APL\11, a UNIX-based interpreter for a version of APL (A Programming Language). I believe that the original version of the program was written by Ken Thompson at Bell Labs before version 6 UNIX, which would put it at about 1975. The program was modified at Yale, distributed on the Berkeley BSD tapes for a while, heavily modified at Purdue and came back to me at Bell Labs in 1981(?). I took it legally with me to Bellcore and then to USWest, and while I was there nagged the AT&T lawyers into letting us almost give it away. I'm not sure if there are still copies of the source tucked away in some Internet archive or not. I ported it to an early version of Linux in 1992.

    I have some statistical and optimization routines written for it back in '81 and '82 that I still use. Deep down it's a toy, without a lot of the things that would be needed for a commercial APL, but contemporary processor speed and memory size makes it a toy on steroids capable of some fairly serious number crunching.

    For those of you not familiar with APL, it has been described as "a mistake, carried through to perfection" and "a write-only language." For certain kinds of problems, though, it makes programmers very, very effective.

  112. Wish I had known.... by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    Wish I had known about this before. I have "Utils" directory that I've hauled around from computer to computer since, at least, 1986, when I added DIRERASE.EXE to my utilities (09/09/1986). The second oldest is a shareware editor written by a friend of mine entitled, simply "E" that I used for a long time (07/06/1987).

    The oldest commercial apps I have are FASTBACK.EXE (a backup program, I think it was commercial), dated 08/17/1988. And SPINRITE (a great tool for setting the interleave of your MFM or RLL hard drive (10/12/1989). It doesn't seem to want to work under Win2K... Strange.

    And then the all important CORETEST.EXE, a hard drive benchmark app that was great (04/23/1990).

  113. Re:WordStar and console automation by son_of_asdf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there are still a lot of console automation systems running on old c-64s, 286 machines, classics macs. My old Allen & Heath console uses a C-64 for mute automation, although we threw that system out years ago--it is easier just to do it manually.One friend of mine still uses a Mac classic for midi sequencing--he sees it as a talisman of sorts.

    --
    Don't Panic!
  114. Re:The mainframe world winner might be ... by clard11 · · Score: 1

    Damn, you beat me to it :-) And APARed several times folks...

    --
    catch (ModDownException mde) {post.modUp("Interesting")}
  115. Most advanced graphical DOS app? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    WordPerfect released WP6 for DOS at one point, probably the most advanced graphical application DOS ever saw.

    Even counting Quake by Id Software?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Most advanced graphical DOS app? by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      Yup, even counting Quake, I mean I never could even get Quake to print my term papers, let alone write them on it.

  116. Re: Win '9x by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    No, Win '9x was NOT designed as I wished it was.

    I realize you could edit the MSDOS.SYS (or use a tool like TweakUI) and hack it so it starts at a command prompt.

    Problem is, the MS-DOS, v7.0 running beneath it was not nearly refined enough to keep DOS a viable product. Microsoft was hell-bent on killing DOS, as you can see by the steps they took throughout Windows '9x updates to hide the DOS layer from plain view.

    Finally, by Win2K, DOS was eliminated completely.

    What I had in mind (among other things) was a DOS that automatically saw the total amount of RAM in a system and could auto-allocate any of it as EMS or XMS on demand, without need for loading device drivers in CONFIG.SYS to "manage" the memory. In fact, it seems like they could have designed it so conventional memory always appeared to still be a full 640K, no matter how many devices you told it to load into conventional. That way, all the old hassles of juggling device drivers around and running "memmaker" would vanish.

  117. Info-ZIP by yerricde · · Score: 1

    for compressing one or two files it is much smaller and much easier to use than old dos PKZip ... or any Winzip

    Have you tried switching to the Info-ZIP suite?

    zip -9 foo.zip f1.doc f2.txt f3.exe
    unzip foo.zip
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  118. IBM Personal Editor 1.0 by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

    I've still got a copy of IBM Personal Editor 1.0 on my machine. It runs in the DOS window of XP on my dual Athlon 2000 computer. Quite a difference from running it on the original IBM PC at 4.77 MHz. I got a copy from a girlfriend in college whose Mom worked for IBM. Man, that was a while ago.

    Why do I still use it occasionally? Because it has block editing features I've never seen in another editor. It rocks! Jim Wyllie, whereever you are, you da man!

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  119. 1978 Northstar by zero_offset · · Score: 1
    I know a guy who does his job-cost estimating on a 1978 Northstar, which is a Z80 machine. It's just a roughly 500-line BASIC program, so I offered to rewrite it for him free of cost to run on his 2GHz P4, but basically the machine has never given him any trouble and he's happy with it. You should see the printer, it's enormous.

    Here is a blurb on the machine: Northstar Horizon

    --

    Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005