Slashdot Mirror


NEC Unveils Methanol-Fueled Laptop

genericplacebo writes "Japanese computer giant NEC Corp. Monday revealed a prototype of a laptop computer that runs on a methanol fuel cell instead of a rechargeable battery, and said it will start selling it next year. NEC initially plans to introduce a computer with a fuel-cell system able to run for five consecutive hours on a single cartridge of methanol fuel, but also plans to make a PC within two years that can run continuously for as long as 40 hours."

363 comments

  1. Merger... by mgcsinc · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was already worried about the concepts of television, telephony, and high-fi merging entirely with that of the personal computer, now I have to worry about computers becoming strikingly similar to automobiles and weed-whackers?

    1. Re:Merger... by howiefl · · Score: 2, Funny

      What we should be working on is a methane powered laptop then all of those late night pizzas will be put to good use.

    2. Re:Merger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the last few days I've submitted stories that have been rejected and then... a few hours later a friend of the mod submits the same story. One or two, sure, but 5?

      Lovely little incestuous family you guys have there.

    3. Re:Merger... by jdray · · Score: 1

      ...or cigarette lighters?

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:Merger... by ecloud · · Score: 1

      Well to maximize your personal methane output I'd recommend beans or egg salad rather than pizza.

      But a fuel-powered laptop would be handy for keeping your pizza warm.

    5. Re:Merger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it certainly would have made my first lawn mowing job more interesting if I could have played dn3d while whacking weeds...hooray for progress!

  2. Well by dysprosia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Doesn't say how chunky the battery will be. Or how heavy it will be. Battery life is a Good Thing, but if it's gotta be at the price of portability, what's the point for a laptop?

    1. Re:Well by CeZa · · Score: 3, Informative

      1.9 lbs. fuel cell

      but total weight including everything required to transform the power,etc. is 4.9lbs. so where usual batteries weigh 1 lbs. +/- 2 this one would weigh 5... so the ultrathin 4lbs. laptop weighs 9lbs.

    2. Re:Well by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seems to me that the proper approach would be to make a laptop that can run on either a battery or a fuel cell. If you're running near AC, run on battery and recharge occasionally. If you're on a 10hr flight or something and they havn't been thoughful enough to have accessory plugs on the plane for laptops and such, or if you're on safari in the middle of Africa, switch to the fuel cell.

      The issue I'm worried about is that the laptop/fuel cell industry will to do what printer manufacturers did for the printer. In other words, make the fuel cell hardware cheap and affordable and price-fix the actual fuel refill components as high as possible to maximize profits. The old razor blade pricing scheme.

      From what I understand of fuel cells, besides requiring the fuel itself which is rather cheap, it requires a rather expensive (and no-doubt proprietary) catalyst component (platinum?) which sort of throws the "refill at home" idea out.

      Maybe you could get 5x methanol refills before replacing the catalyst or something, but I'm waiting to see what the pricing of the fuel technology will be before jumping onboard.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:Well by ancukiewiczd · · Score: 1

      It would be kinda hard to price-fix methanol considering how standard it is... that's like trying to price-fix water. This is, of course, assuming that only pure methanol is needed.

    4. Re:Well by BitterOak · · Score: 4, Insightful
      By definition a catalyst is not consumed in the reaction, and so theoretically, it should not be necessary to replace it for a very long time.

      As far as I understood, the whole advantage of fuel cell based laptops was you could simply open a spout and pour more fuel into it, like a camp stove. If, instead, you must buy proprietary cartridges like printers, I don't see why people would opt for a fuel cell based computer rather than a conventional rechargeable battery. In fact, the proprietary scheme you described above would be rather more like a laptop which runs on non-rechargeable batteries! I can't imagine anyone buying such a thing.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    5. Re:Well by madskills · · Score: 0

      Correct. You don't replace the catalytic converter in your car every 5 tanks of gas do you? It's the same catalyst - platinum.

    6. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, on the 10 hour flight, you could get those little airplane booze bottles and fill up ... alchohol is a lot more plentiful than electricity in underdeveloped areas.

    7. Re:Well by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you can get 55 gallon drums of methanol various places, ag supply is one of them. That should last you ...awhile, heh.

      Personally, I like methanol over a hydrogen-based economy (at this time), liquid fuel, very little of anything weird required to use it, and storage is no problem. Gas up your ride, gas up your box at the same pump!

    8. Re:Well by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >By definition a catalyst is not consumed in the reaction, and so theoretically, it should not be necessary to replace it for a very long time.

      Precisely correct. The open question is whether impurities in random cheap methanol sources will poison the catalyst, like running leaded gas through a car with a catalytic converter.

    9. Re:Well by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      if you want some good info on fule cells just google the DoEnergy and such. Fuel cells preferably use only pure methanol or H2 (not as combustable as people think it is; hendenberg was ignited by the paint, not by the gas) as they produce only small amounts of products (H2 makes water and e-, essentially. i think a small amount of CO2, not from the H2, logically, also). Methanol produced large amounts of CO2 as compared to H2 but is considered the next best thing. Better if you consider the ability to get it. If it companies can make it so that the catalysts and the membranes (the important parts) are inexpensive and don't break, while miniaturizing the whole thing, this really could work well. Not to mention the heat put off is negligible (no combustion).

    10. Re:Well by SlipJig · · Score: 1

      I don't see why people would opt for a fuel cell based computer

      Except remember, it still gets 5+ hours of continuous use and you can "recharge" it instantly. I know a lot of people who would pay mondo bucks for that capability, seeing as how being business people, they'll expense it anyway.

      --
      Read my keyboard review.
  3. Don't drink and drive! by NumberField · · Score: 5, Funny

    Computers are already too unstable and crash-prone. I hate to think how it'll be when my laptop is busy drinking alcohol while I'm trying to work...

    1. Re:Don't drink and drive! by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2
      " Computers are already too unstable and crash-prone. I hate to think how it'll be when my laptop is busy drinking alcohol while I'm trying to work..."

      Yeah but look at all the great writers like Hemmingway that were constantly pissed. Your e-mails, blogs and IMs could now become so much more... expressive.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:Don't drink and drive! by halftrack · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Mind you, methanol may induse blindness which may be considered an advantage when having to use Windows.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    3. Re:Don't drink and drive! by karit · · Score: 1

      Reminds a bit like the Simpsons when Homer found out about alcohol fueled car and had picture of him going one for you one for me .....

      --
      http://blog.karit.geek.nz/
    4. Re:Don't drink and drive! by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Nah. The webcam would just stop functioning.

      --
      Lalala
    5. Re:Don't drink and drive! by ThomasFlip · · Score: 0

      Actually if you drink methanol you will die in matter of seconds.

      --
      If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    6. Re:Don't drink and drive! by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      Bite my shiny, metal ass.

    7. Re:Don't drink and drive! by RALE007 · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I've been waiting for! "I'm not an alcoholic! I don't drink alone. I only drink socially... my current drinking buddy is a P4 with a gig of ram...."

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    8. Re:Don't drink and drive! by hashwolf · · Score: 1

      To drink or to work?

      That IS the problem!

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
  4. So what by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this means jack squat to me right now. I have an iBook that lasts about 4-5 hours on a full charge and to power it all I have to use are those little holes in the walls you may have seen.

    Fuel cells WILL be a big deal, but right now you're retarted to buy one: electricity just workd too well already

    1. Re:So what by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I assume that you would still be able to plug into the wall to use your laptop when you don't want to use the fuel cell. The best part about this is the 'instant recharge' effect. You don't have to wait hours for your batter to recharge. If the market takes off you will be able to buy Methanol fuel cells at starbucks.

      Laptops seems like a great market entry point for fuel cells.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    2. Re:So what by DarkMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The point with this is that currently you cannot buy one. This is (one of?) the first methanol fuel cells laptops. Give it a year (frankly, year an a half given typical engineering development time estimates), then, and only then, will you have a choice.

      Now, all that aside, I'd rather have the fuel cell system. Let's assume that they weigh the same, and run for a similar time on one charge, like you suggest. With a methanol fuel cell, a replacement charge will weight, what, 100g, cost around a dollar or two, and be field recharageable. This means that I can carry enough fuel to last a day of use without falling over. To do that same trick with batteries, you'd have to carry 5 spare batteries, each costing, what, 50-75 dollars [0], and weigh the thick end of a kilogram each. Not only that, but spare batteries have an interenal discharge rate, meaning that they cannot be stored indefinitly (It's about a month for NiCd, less for NiMh, dunno about Li technologies).

      Granted, if you break a methanol cartridge, then it's not pleasant stuff. Mind you, nethers the contents of your typical battery.

      The trade off is then you can carry much more fuel, but you'll need to find a specialist to get more, vs the limited fuel and easy refilling for battery technologies.

      Once the runtime of a single cartridge of methanol gets up, to me that's a no brainer. YMMV

      [0] Off top of head, no actual idea how accurate that is - it's based of raw cells.

    3. Re:So what by Minderbinder106 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sweet, you spelled 'retarded' wrong. What a retart

    4. Re:So what by Surak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course almost no one will call them 'Methanol fuel cells' because that sounds too nerdish and is too difficult to say.

      So when you go to Starbucks and order you're double espresso latte with extra whipped cream and sprinkles on top, you'll probably be asking for a 'meth pack' with that. :)

    5. Re:So what by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      yeah, I saw that too....why the hell do you always spell something wrong when you are describing how dumb something is?

    6. Re:So what by Izago909 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That just sounds wrong. You try to help save the environment by saving energy, but you drink over-priced products from a company that levels thousands of acres of rain forrest to grow coffee. Lets not forget that they fund intertribal warfare to help remove any people living there.
      Thats like WalMart fighting sweat shops by only selling clothing "Made in the USA". Yea, some small Pacific islands are US holdings, even though sweat shops run amok there. But who cares as long as the gas your SUV sucks down isn't shown by popular media to fund terrorism. "Your Hummer helped kill over 3000 people."

    7. Re:So what by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " I have an iBook that lasts about 4-5 hours on a full charge and to power it all I have to use are those little holes in the walls you may have seen."

      Ever been on a plane ride where those holes in the walls don't seem to be anywhere near your seat?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:So what by Orne · · Score: 1

      Refill at Starbucks? I knew their coffee tasted a little funky...

    9. Re:So what by Zirnike · · Score: 4, Informative
      Methanol is like isoproponol. It'll evaporate fairly quickly, shouldn't damage your laptop's plastic much, etc. Unlike IPA, it can be absorbed through the skin and causes nerve damage, but it requires a fair amount for any significant effect. Basically, if you break a refill cartridge, wipe your hands then pick up the spill, and that's pretty much it. Only people like me who work with it all the time really need to be worried about exposure.

      (MSDS sheet for MeOH.)

      Admittedly, I'd be happier if they got ethanol fuel cells working. It's much less toxic, and supplies are easier to find.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    10. Re:So what by Surak · · Score: 1

      That just sounds wrong. You try to help save the environment by saving energy, but you drink over-priced products from a company that levels thousands of acres of rain forrest to grow coffee. Lets not forget that they fund intertribal warfare to help remove any people living there.

      Ummm...yeah, exactly, right. Don't forget those bleached paperboard coffee cups they serve that coffee in either. Let's also not forget that methanol itself is somewhat harmful to the environment, either (although it's much more environmentally friendly than gasoline or batteries and comes from a renewable source [corn].) As a Wiccan, I'm very environmentally aware. I might poke fun now and then (mirth and reverence being very important in our society and to us as human beings), but I take these issues very seriously.

    11. Re:So what by gnarled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      iBooks along with most laptops have very nice removable battery packs. Maybe a system could be devised where the battery pack could be swapped out for the methanol cell whenever you need something for a much longer time than 4-5 hours. Then when your off the plane you can put your battery back in and go back to using your standard convenient energy source; ie the wall.

      --
      I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
    12. Re:So what by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      I think that i'd be right at the front of the line if somebody developed one of these. Very useful indeed

    13. Re:So what by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to use lab grade methanol to clean computers. Takes the dirt and grime right off an old IBM PC/AT case, with the paint coming off if you rub a little longer.

      Built like tanks, those old IBM machines.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    14. Re:So what by kavau · · Score: 2, Insightful
      this means jack squat to me right now. I have an iBook that lasts about 4-5 hours on a full charge and to power it all I have to use are those little holes in the walls you may have seen. Fuel cells WILL be a big deal, but right now you're retarted to buy one: electricity just workd too well already

      Well, just think about the wildlife photographer, who uses his notebook to assess his digital photographs; or the "embedded reporter" in the middle of (whatever country Bush is going to invade next)... they surely won't want to trail a 2000-mile extension cord behind that's jacked into the wall of their cozy home!

      Get a grip, man: there are people with needs different from yours, and that's no reason to call them retarded!

      Note to moderator: how the heck is this insightful?

    15. Re:So what by Patik · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet you're fun at parties.

    16. Re:So what by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ever been on a plane where they let you take a large quantity of some highly combustable hydrocarbon into the cabin with you? ;-)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there were a demand for this, Starbucks would already give you a charged battery in exchange for the drained battery and a moderate fee.

      Methanol would be a bit more convenient, and fully interoperable between brands, but I really don't think the demand for effective quick-recharging is enough to drive a switch to methanol powered appliances.

      Don't get me wrong -- to sell, the fuel cells do need to be quickly refillable. But if they do take off, it will be only because of higher energy density than electrochemical cells.

    18. Re:So what by Stubtify · · Score: 1

      haha great post, wish I had mod points right now. I hate meeting people like that at parties.

    19. Re:So what by pj737 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and so what? Who's going to buy a laptop just so they can use it on the plane? Either you're real lucky or your job sucks.

    20. Re:So what by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... carbon... Coal fueled laptops!! THAT will work! it is an old technology and should be easy to implement. Just has to have the right sulfur content, around 40% and it will be PERFECT. it would work GREAT in planes and would be a HIT in places like California! Schweet. Now i just have to wait for the money to roll on in...

    21. Re:So what by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, and so what? Who's going to buy a laptop just so they can use it on the plane? Either you're real lucky or your job sucks."

      Ask any salesman or business executive who does business deals. They have their laptops up all the time. They also have PDAs, wireless email, etc. The demand is there by a group of people who'll be happy to splurge on the company's dime.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:So what by binarybum · · Score: 1
      Admittedly, I'd be happier if they got ethanol fuel cells working. It's much less toxic, and supplies are easier to find.


      Easier for you maybe! But for those under 21 they'd have to ask their older brothers to go out and buy them laptop batteries.

      --
      ôó
    23. Re:So what by pj737 · · Score: 1

      Great, but I still don't see the benefit of the fuel cell over an extra battery or universal battery (70+ watt-hours). A truly mobile businessman would invest in a Centrino-equipped laptop, like an IBM. It can run for 7+ hours on a 55 watt-hour battery. An additional 3-4 lb universal battery (approx $300) would provide an additional 9+ hours. 16+ hours?? Yeah, some flights w/stopovers could be this long, but would you (or could you) be on a laptop for that long when flying?? If so, you're definitely an anomaly. Manufacturers don't market to anomalies..

    24. Re:So what by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      I don't preach to others. I'll talk with people who are curious. But its irritating to me when people make half-assed attempts to do something when it comes to not destroying the environment that sustains you. Only when the last tree is cut, the last fish dead, and the last bit of water polluted, will people realize that you cant't eat money.

    25. Re:So what by RALE007 · · Score: 1

      I think the whole Linux/Free Beer thing has gone a little too far. It's safe to say it's officially out of control when your laptop starts knocking back cold ones.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    26. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...right now you're retarted...

      Says the genius who can't spell retarded.

    27. Re:So what by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > fully interoperable between brand

      No way... Laptop batteries are not interchangeable, there's no reason to believe that methanol cells will be either. They'll have different storage capacities, different designs, etc.

    28. Re:So what by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      Doh, the airline you use must have a crappy inflight bar.

      --
    29. Re:So what by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 1
      You try to help save the environment by saving energy, but you drink over-priced products from a company that levels thousands of acres of rain forrest to grow coffee. Lets not forget that they fund intertribal warfare to help remove any people living there.

      Maybe I missed something, but who's trying to save the environment here? This is all about extended running times without recharging batteries, not saving the environment (as opposed to say, fuel cells in cars).

      --
      Why?
    30. Re:So what by Cyn · · Score: 1

      so do coffee mugs - doesn't mean you can't buy a container larger than your mug and top it off just fine.

      hotdogs and hotdog buns come in mismatched sizes, I still seem to see people eating hot dogs on occassion, can't be all bad. [well, okay, hot dogs suck pretty hard - like your bologna with 150 first names, but the point is there]

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    31. Re:So what by Cyn · · Score: 1

      I dunno, if you show up at Starbucks and ask for 'meth', chances are you won't walk out of there with what you want. You might get a shiny new pair of bracelets and be escorted by a nice blue uniformed public servant, though.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    32. Re:So what by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      where do you think all those dead batteries end up? That's right, in your ground and your water supply. Laptops already have the same battery life as they are promoting. The environment isn't THE reason, but it is A reason.

    33. Re:So what by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > so do coffee mugs - doesn't mean you can't buy a container larger than your mug and top it off just fine.

      Yes, but a coffee mug's connection size (the hole) is independent of the source connection (the coffee pot pouring hole). While the fuel itself will be interchangeable, the cells that hold that fuel probably will not. I believe I may have just misunderstood the statement being made (i.e., parent meant fuel, I meant container).

    34. Re:So what by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that they would supply it denatured. 90% of the cost of ethanol on the standard market is taxes on alcoholic beverages. Ethanol which is used industrially is generally tax-exempt I believe, and you can get it in 5 gallon containers for probably $30.

      The standard way to avoid taxes is to denature the alcohol so that it cannot be ingested. I don't know all the rules in avoiding the tax, but I'm guessing standard methods are to either put a fair amount of methanol in the fuel, or to add a poison of some sort. The poison route has the advantage of needing less contaminant. Neither route of course gets around the toxic materials complaint.

      It is unlikely that NEC will convince the various states to not tax the sale of undenatured ethanol for use in laptops unless the containers are so small as to make extraction of the ethanol impractical. But that also has large costs.

    35. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that anything like pop tarts?

  5. Cost? by levin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So . . . how much will it cost to recharge/replace the fuel cell?

    --

    `which fortune`
    1. Re:Cost? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      "So . . . how much will it cost to recharge/replace the fuel cell?"

      More to the point, will your mates include your laptop in the next round?

      Free as in methanol, anyone?

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:Cost? by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      Better question: What about hydrogen cells? I'd like the idea of using electricty to split water at home than paying some unseen body for ethenol. It might also be cheaper too.

    3. Re:Cost? by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You remember those stories about how drinking "moonshine" (homemade) alcohol can make you go blind?

      That's because of methanol.

      Methanol = industrial alcohol (poisonous)
      Ethanol = grain alcohol (drinkable)

      Gonna be awfully hard to use a laptop when you can't see!
      =Smidge=

    4. Re:Cost? by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 1

      Methanol (a room temperature liquid) is much, much, much easier to store and transfer from container to container than hydrogen (a notoriously difficult to contain gas). A device capable of containing the latter will invariably be much simpler and less expensive than the former.

      Besides, local laws permitting, anyone can make methanol at home as well with an appropriate small garden plot and a still.

      As for cost: "The Methanex non-discounted US reference price for July 2003 is $263 per tonne (79.0 cents per gallon)." That sounds like wholesale... but the markup shouldn't be more than a few hundred percent, so it should still be considerably less than $1 per pint.

    5. Re:Cost? by ewhenn · · Score: 1

      Go blind?

      Maybe, but you still get a wicked buzz...

    6. Re:Cost? by ChuyMatt · · Score: 2, Funny

      nononoNO! that is not alcohol. You are mixing up one taboo with another. One you do with your hand and your mouth and the other with you hand and... erm... welllll... you know. That and harry palms too, right? or am i mixed up?

    7. Re:Cost? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I don't think *drinking* is the reason he'll go blind while using his computer.

    8. Re:Cost? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      drinking alcohol is ethanol.

      Methanol == TOXIC!!!

      Bad alcohol... Bad, Bad Alcohol. Do not drink the Methanol -- Here, have a beer instead.

    9. Re:Cost? by brakk · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. Especially since my apartment is all-bills-paid. I've been looking for a way to take some of this free electricity with me when I move into my own house.

  6. Let's see.... by mbstone · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I get to use the carpool lane of the information superhighway?

  7. Light humor follows by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dare you to put an AMD in it.

    1. Re:Light humor follows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah - too hot for meths, as any fule noes.

  8. That's kind of wierd. by Meat+Blaster · · Score: 1

    I run on methanol, too.

    1. Re:That's kind of wierd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you're saying you're not only blind but dead also?

    2. Re:That's kind of wierd. by m0rphm0nkey · · Score: 1

      Ok so meatblaster has a little chemistry problem. But so do I, methanol=methane? or a close derivative? Does this mean we can stick a tube up our arses after a particularly lentilicous meal and (with the benifit of an AC (alternate crap) adapter) run various electronics?

      Or maybe this is the new cyber cafe? Possible....

    3. Re:That's kind of wierd. by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should take some Beano, sir.

      --
      This sig no verb.
  9. AA ? by lordsilence · · Score: 1

    Hope we won't see an increase of computer-enthusiasts among anonymous-alcoholics.

  10. Incase of Slashdotting by DaddyExcellent · · Score: 1, Informative

    TOKYO - Japanese computer giant NEC Corp. Monday revealed a prototype of a laptop computer that runs on an ethanol fuel cell instead of a rechargeable battery, and said it will start selling it within a week. A number of other companies are developing similar fuel cells, which promise to power electronics ten times longer than the lithium-ion batteries currently in use. Also, users will be able to keep operating their computers by replacing the fuel cartridge or refilling with ethanol fuel, instead of recharging the battery with electrics. NEC initially plans to introduce a computer with a fuel-cell system able to run for ten consecutive hours on a single cartridge of ethanol fuel, but also plans to make a PC within two years that can run continuously for as long as 200 hours. Fuel cells produce electricity without generating pollutants, through an electrochemical reaction that uses oxygen, hydrogen and cress. Japanese companies are shaping up to be pioneers in fuel-cell technology. NEC rival Toshiba Corp. said in March it developed the world's first prototype of a ethanol-type fuel cell system to run notebook PCs. It also plans to commercialize its product in 2004. Among other leading Japanese micro fuel cell developers are Sony Corp (news - web sites)., Casio Computer Co. and Hitachi Ltd.

    1. Re:Incase of Slashdotting by henrygb · · Score: 1

      When did a page reproducing the original article get rated "Informative" when it is full of deliberate errors? Try "Funny" instead - at least for the cress.

    2. Re:Incase of Slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma Whore, I doubt yahoo will get slashdotted.

  11. Fuel Cell = RIP off by rkz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some might think that fuel cell is the greatest thing since Lithium Ion batteries but its really another way of getting money out of the poor consumer. The current range of IBM R40 centrino notebooks can provide you with 4 hours of battery life.

    Laptop makers are looking for the high profit margins that ink jet printer manufacturers enjoy. How much will these full cell cartrages cost? Around $5 a pop? Thats absurd, wouldn't you rather recharge the fucking thing!

    1. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earlier today on techtv(it was a re-run, I believe this was the 397th time they've showed that episode), they reviewed a laptop from ibm, they said it averaged about 7 hours on a single charge, they had better increase the battery time up before they release that laptop, or people are going to be justifiably pissed off.

    2. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by egommer · · Score: 1
      Laptop makers are looking for the high profit margins that ink jet printer manufacturers enjoy.

      Don't worry! With my new seringe, rubbing alcohol, and duct tape kit I will refill your cartridge for $3.99 plus shipping and handling. If you act now? I will throw in a box of Q-tips and klenex to help you dry out your eyes and clean out your ears for those long flights to conspiracy land.

      --
      Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
    3. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by oolon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It says it the article that your be able to refil it, (hay you gas your car without thinking about it). Methanol is very cheap you will be able to buy a bottle of it from a Home Improvement (DIY) shop for 2 bucks and the size bottles they sell I will expect that will be 10-20 or so charges. Which compares quite favourably with electric. As to flying on planes and such, they are making sure the are approved before releasing them to the public.

      James

    4. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Some might think that fuel cell is the greatest thing since Lithium Ion batteries but its really another way of getting money out of the poor consumer. The current range of IBM R40 centrino notebooks can provide you with 4 hours of battery life."

      No, it's really another way to provide power to people who can't always get it. Imagine the business traveller spending all day getting from one end to the country to the other. He can't recharge his laptop on the plane. He could bring an extra battery or two, but those are at least $150 a pop. If all he has to pay is $5 to get his laptop going again (without even needing to charge, mind you) then he's got himself a good valuable service.

      Fuel cells certainly wouldn't be a rip-off for the sales people working at my company. (Although I do feel they are doing something wrong if they actually have to work on the plane. That's their business, though.)

      Laptops will come with both battery and fuel cell options, it's not like fuel cells will be the only player on the block.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0

      you will be able to buy a bottle of it from a Home Improvement (DIY) shop for 2 bucks...

      I'm sure they'll add some sort of 'required' proprietry substance... Hence ruling out the refill-at-home idea...

      (Hell, they'll probably patent the concept of adding something 'special' into something ordinary for the purposes of raking in shed-loads of cash.)

    6. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by oolon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They could but I doubt they would for the simple reason, they are competing against rechargable batteries if they do not offer a product that works better for a similar price they will not get anyone to switch from the status quo, after all rechargables are good enough that we don't use one time batteries. Refilling does not have to be free, electric seems free, just cos you get the bill all in one go and forget about it. Refilling just has to be convenient [going to a shop each time is not convenient unless like your car you can do it once a week] and cost effective [comparied to the status quo], 10-20 cent refil would be my guess.

      Working better does not just mean extended life is the only thing that might be improved. Other options are, better shelf life (i.e sitting idle for 6 months on 3/4 full and still be 3/4 full on use). Still providing 5 hours of unconnected usage after 2 years of product use.

      James

    7. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by sribe · · Score: 1

      Laptop makers are looking for the high profit margins that ink jet printer manufacturers enjoy. How much will these full cell cartrages cost? Around $5 a pop? Thats absurd, wouldn't you rather recharge the fucking thing!

      Actually, a great deal of what they're looking for is higher output in order to power faster processors.

      Methanol is a very potent neurotoxin, is relatively volatile, and has a much lower energy storage density than ethanol. Ethanol is relatively non-toxic by comparison (unless you imbibe very heavily), is less volatile, contains much more energy per mass or volume unit, and can be made and distilled to an acceptable grade by just about anyone, anywhere.

      And none of that matters one bit if you can't come up with a catalyst to "crack" the hydrogen out of it. Remember, fuel cells do not "burn" their fuel!

    8. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by confused+one · · Score: 1
      How long do you really think it will be before someone comes up with a "refill kit" that will allow you to fill it with methanol from the local hardware store (available by the quart or gallon)?

      That is, if it's not already refillable (which it's supposed to be...)

    9. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Methanol is very cheap you will be able to buy a bottle of it from a Home Improvement (DIY) shop for 2 bucks and the size bottles they sell I will expect that will be 10-20 or so charges.

      Two words: Fat chance.

      These are going to take cartridges that you'll have to buy prefilled. The recuring revenue potential of a system like that will be too big a lure for laptop manufacturers to ignore. Expect them to lobby for FAA regulations only allowing the prefilled canisters on airplanes to preemptivly squash any lawsuits from people wanting to refill. I predict ~$5 a charge.

    10. Re:Fuel Cell = RIP off by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      $5 for (an eventual) 40 hours? That's 12.5 cents an hour. Not bad at all, and about the same price as most battery-operated devices today cost to run. Personally, I'd pay that to have a laptop that could last the duration of a plane trip without having to be recharged. As it is, I can't get through a single DVD movie on my laptop's lithium ion battery.

  12. alternatives by jnguy · · Score: 1

    I suppose its a good thing to find alternatives for electricity and energy, but is this pratical. Having people fill up cartridge with gas in order to use their laptop. Unless there are as many refill stations as their are electrical sockets, I won't be getting one

  13. First Read "Methanol" as "Methane"..... by bluesky74656 · · Score: 1

    and figured these fuel cells should be easy and cheap to refill, the price being a late night at Taco Bell. :)

    --
    This page was generated by a Flock of Attack Kittens for you.
  14. am i stupid? by libnatel · · Score: 1

    but what the hell is methanol?

    1. Re:am i stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Methanol is methyl alcohol.

    2. Re:am i stupid? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      CH3-OH The simplest alcohol. Methanol is sometimes referred to as wood alcohol because it was originally produced when wood is broken . Ethanol on the other hand is one carbon larger: CH3-CH2-OH This is grain alcohol, the kind we drink. It's kinda too bad they're not using ethanol instead of methanol. It would be great for iowa, and one day we might have robots who dring malt liquor for power. (The cigar just looks cool) Plus, I'd have an excuse for that flask in my briefcase. ;)

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:am i stupid? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I meant to say methanol is produced by breaking wood down with heat and collecting the vapors. Distillation essentially.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:am i stupid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean I broke all my pencils for nothing ;)

  15. Fill 'er up by Chatmag · · Score: 1

    Methanol can be produced from organic waste products. I'd hate to think about having to go to the local sewer treatment plant and ask them to fill up my laptop.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  16. Not allowed on airplanes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consider if you really think the FAA will allow you to bring spare FUEL onto an airplane. I expect that the place where you really need longer battery life - an airplane - will be the one place where these are not allowed.

    1. Re:Not allowed on airplanes by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

      Not to mention all of the leaky fuel cells that are gonna register with the bomb-sniffer machines now in place at airports.

      Basically means that if you put a leaky one in your laptop and then take it out before (possibly even days before) you head off to the airport you may still get flagged as a terrorist and have a major problem on your hands real quick.

      It really amazes me how some people will push an idea forward knowing full well how much possible chaos it will create for other "working" systems. And I say "working" lightly.

      Of course I don't have any technical data behind the fuel cell gadgets so any and all of the above is just pure speculation.

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
    2. Re:Not allowed on airplanes by lobotomy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Wrong. Quote from a Space.com story that appeared on Yahoo News (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=9 6&ncid=753&e=10&u=/space/20030603/sc_space/on_the_ edge__the_future_of_fuel_cells):
      The Department of Transportation gave the industry a big boost last October when it announced that a fuel cell design by PolyFuel would be allowed on airplanes, a change from the airline industry's rigid "no fuels" policy. Methanol powered devices, such as cell phones and laptops, should appear within the next two years.
    3. Re:Not allowed on airplanes by firebee · · Score: 1

      I'm not up on the latest stuff, I guess, but I though that the bomb-sniffers were looking largely or entirely for nitrates. I'd find it kind of surprising that they would look for alcohols, given that alcohols are common in cleaning products, cosmetic products, and of course beverages, all of which are likely to come in contact with (or leak in) people's luggage.

      Additionally, I'm pretty sure that methanol is about as volatile as isopropyl alcohol, which is to say pretty volatile. I think you'd have to completely soak the bag, and then not air it out afterwards, to leave any residue after a few days.

      And even if they did test for alcohols, and you came in with a bag dripping in (and reeking of) methanol, I doubt you'd get "flagged as a terrorist". More likely, you'd just get your bag gone through, as at least in my local airport, the bomb-sniffer things seem to be used as first-pass screening to select bags to search by hand.

      Now, I don't know that you'd be able to carry the actual fuel cells on the plane -- it would depend on the size of the container and how it was sealed. If it was like a print cartridge, it would go through, just as you can carry on print cartridges now (You can, right? I'd actually never thought of it before). If it was like a fuel bottle for a camping stove, then it wouldn't go through.

  17. How about on airplanes? by expro · · Score: 4, Funny

    It must be that it will be easier to take extra flammable fuel on board an airplane than extra batteries!

    1. Re:How about on airplanes? by VCAGuy · · Score: 1
      It must be that it will be easier to take extra flammable fuel on board an airplane than extra batteries!
      Yeah, I'm sure the FAA/CAA/Transport Canada will be absolutely thrilled at the prospect. I can see it now: "I'm sorry sir, we need to confiscate your fuel cell."
      --
      Q: "Why do sound techs say 'check 1, 2'?"
      A: "Cause if they could count any higher they'd be lighting techs."
    2. Re:How about on airplanes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the FAA has already certified fuel cells. Someone figured out how to make them work when watered down, so they aren't highly flammable.

      This was on /. already... I'm too lazy to search.

    3. Re:How about on airplanes? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      If they expect people to use it, the manufacturers will have to get exemptions from the FAA. If properly designed...

    4. Re:How about on airplanes? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > the FAA has already certified fuel cells

      According to this, that isn't true. One of the quotes:

      > Because MTI's micro fuel cells are powered by methanol, a flammable liquid, the FAA is banning them for in-flight use

      Granted, that's from the last few days of 2002, but the FAA is a U.S. gov agency... allowing something previously banned would take many, many months of bullshit and paperwork. That's even assuming they got on top of it in the beginning of 2003.

    5. Re:How about on airplanes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't it take some expensive scanning equipment to tell the difference between a not-highly flamable fuel cell and a terrorist modified highly flamable fuel cell?

    6. Re:How about on airplanes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry, but...

      i don't think this will fly :)

  18. Batteries? by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Why would anyone use a battery if you can plug it into the little holes in the wall?

    1. Re:Batteries? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Why would anyone use a battery if you can plug it into the little holes in the wall? "

      Can somebody please explain to me why this is insightful?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're an idiot who feels the need to pollute slashdot with his penis envy.

    3. Re:Batteries? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Because you're an idiot who feels the need to pollute slashdot with his penis envy."

      If he has penis envy, then why are you trying to make yourself sound better than him?

  19. Ob Homer by eap · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mmm...alcohol fueled computer. One for you, one for me.

  20. Not only crash... by sharlskdy · · Score: 1

    This adds a whole new level of meaning to crash and burn!

    1. Re:Not only crash... by Exiler · · Score: 1

      I thought after the movie "Hackers" was released the geek subculture silently agreed never to do that.

      --
      Banaaaana!
  21. Methanol? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It uses METHanol?

    Leak or vent even a little of that onto/into the user and he could go blind.

    Even WITHOUT surfing porn sites. B-(

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Methanol? by halftrack · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got 5 liters of 50-80% methanol sitting on the floor and handle it quite often when flying model airplanes. And yes it's toxic and you can go blind, but only if you drink a reasonable amount (or maybe get it into your eye.) However I routinly spill it on my skin and even blow suck on tubes that carry methanol and it's never made me sick. So unless someone drinks it, it's not more dangerous than, say using a pair of scissors. You have to do something stupid to get seriously injured, not much more dangerous than gas I suppose (probably a bit more toxic.)

      --
      Look a monkey!
    2. Re:Methanol? by DarkMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not quite.

      It will only adversly affect vision when consumed. Getting methanol on your hands has an unpleasent smell and leaves the skin feeling really yucky [0]. If you leave it there for prolonged times, then it can cross the skin, but I'm not convinced that's a significant danger in a consumer product (given that people will tend to go an wash it off should it get spilt).

      Methanol/Ethanol solutions are available from my high street - it's not that dangerous.

      In fact, I'd rate it about as dangrous as boiling water, or there abouts. Even if consumed, there is an appreciable quantity before the effects kick in [1]. So, yes, drinking the contents of a methanol cartidge will be really unpleasnt, and probably have perment nasty effects. Just like drinking the contents of your typical battery, in fact. [2]

      [0] I was a lab chemist, that's from experience.

      [1] The real problem is vodka that's contaniated with methanol. It's cheap, and the sort of people who tend to buy that drink enough to get retinal damage. It's not skin contact.

      [2] Ok, yes, it would be easier to crack open a methanol cartridge and drink that. It's all about levels of risk.

    3. Re:Methanol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methanol is toxic, and can be absorbed through skin or by breathing fumes. But "even a little of that" won't hurt you. You'd have to drink the stuff. And if you go as far as to drink from your battery, the heavy metals in Li-ion or NiCad batteries will probably be more dangerous than methanol.

    4. Re:Methanol? by alienw · · Score: 1

      No, you (probably) can't go blind from getting it into your eye or breathing fumes. It's not the methanol that's so toxic, it's the byproducts which are formed when it's digested (like formaldehyde). Virtually all methanol poisoning cases occur when people substitute it for ethanol and drink it.

    5. Re:Methanol? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'd rate it even safer than that. Given the choice of putting my hand in methanol, or boiling water, I sure know what I would choose!

      Methanol is toxic in amounts measured in milliliters (50-500), not amounts that one could get transdermally from occasional contact.

      The toxicity of methanol is interesting. It's not directly toxic, it breaks down into formaldehyde in your liver, which is toxic. The antidote to methanol poisioning is ethanol, because it has a higher affinity for the things that break methanol down into toxic stuff. It basically keeps your liver busy so it can't get around to killing you. This is the same route of toxicity as antifreeze.

      Chronic exposure is probably a bad thing, but I doubt that will be an issue, as you said, the stuff in today's batteries is much nastier, and we don't have problems with that.

      Anyway, that's my lay understanding of the issue. I work with various solvents all the time, including methanol denatured alcohol, and other than dry skin, I've never had any ill effects, and I'm pretty sloppy with them. I worry much more about fire hazard than toxic effects.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Methanol? by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
      The antidote to methanol poisioning is ethanol

      Interesting ... so when you come running into a hospital and say you have methanol poisoning, they're gonna fill you up with booze?

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    7. Re:Methanol? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pretty much. Basically you will get an everclear IV drip.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  22. Pull start boot? by cpopin · · Score: 3, Funny

    So I'll have to pull start this laptop to boot it up?

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
    1. Re:Pull start boot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly hope so. Best. Idea. Ever.

  23. I can't wait... by Captain+Kangaroo · · Score: 1

    ... to try to get one of these things through airport security, to say nothing of the 5 replacement cartridges I'll be carrying in my briefcase.

    1. Re:I can't wait... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I took a chem class but it's methanol (CH3OH) and not methane (CH4). Menthanol is much much harder to ignite. The problem I'm curious about is the emissions, methanol results in formaldehyde (CH2O) when combusted. I'm not sure what the fuel cell results in but I'm thinking it's the same. So, where does the waste go???

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:I can't wait... by borgboy · · Score: 1

      Its an electrochemical reaction with platinum as a catalyst. Yields water vapor and electricity, and, uhh, some oxide of carbon. Yeah.

      --
      meh.
  24. From printer cartridges to fuel cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok heres whats going to bake your noodle about adopting fuel cells: Will fuel cells be proprietary in the same manner that printer cartridges are proprietary?

    Will you only be allowed to buy your fuel cells from your laptop manufacturer for an overpriced ammount? And how long until they start emplacing mechanisms that ensure that your fuel cell can't be refilled outside of the factory? And worse yet, when will they start using the DMCA to enforce these policies?

    1. Re:From printer cartridges to fuel cells by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Will fuel cells be proprietary in the same manner that printer cartridges are proprietary?"

      Yep. In the same way that batteries and AC power supplies are.

      Is that a bad thing? Not necessarily. I mean I understand what you're saying, and I think your fears are justified. However, I wouldn't fret just yet. There's a well established alternative to fuel-cells that people'll be happy to revert to if these companies get greedy. Lithium ion batteries. The printing industry doesn't have this type of competitor except for laser printers.

      It'll be in these company's best interests to not piss off their customers, or this model won't work well. On the other hand, it could potentially make laptops better machines. If they're making money on your buying refills, then they want you to keep your machine longer. They certainly wouldn't want you switching to another brand.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:From printer cartridges to fuel cells by ahunter · · Score: 1
      Will you only be allowed to buy your fuel cells from your laptop manufacturer for an overpriced ammount?

      Probably. The fuel for the fuel cells, on the other hand... Depends. If this takes off, a nonproprietary method of refuelling will doubtless be much more popular as refills will be much more widely available as a result.
      And how long until they start emplacing mechanisms that ensure that your fuel cell can't be refilled outside of the factory?

      Never, because it's not as if battery technology will go away. If this can't compete, it will die. (Would anyone buy something that has to be sent back to the factory every 40 or so hours?)
      And worse yet, when will they start using the DMCA to enforce these policies?

      DMCA! DMCA! There, I said it! Now mod me insightful! (Sheesh). I bet they'll patent 'em, too, the evil corporate pigopolists that they are. Probably copyright the manuals, too, the bastards.
  25. Methyl alcohol by dark-br · · Score: 5, Informative

    Methanol (methyl alcohol) is produced from the distillation of wood and is a clear, colorless, volatile liquid with a weak odor that is somewhat sweeter than ethanol. Methanol is used in the industrial production of many synthetic organic compounds and is a constituent of many commercially available solvents. Products that are available in the home that contain methanol include: windshield wiper fluids and de-icers, antifreeze, glass cleaner, canned heat, paints, varnishes, paint thinners and removers. It can also be used in gasohol, which could present problems as people try to siphon the gas by mouth and accidentally ingest some. Methanol is a natural fermentation product and its concentration may be up to 300 mg/L in wine, and even higher in other spirits.

    Methanol is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract mucosa as well as through the skin and lungs. Both inhalation and transdermal exposure can result in toxicity. The exact lethal dose for a human is not known. Doses as low as 25 cc of 40% methanol have been reported as causing toxicity. In other cases doses up to 500 cc have occurred with no side effects. Most sources consider the minimal lethal dose to be around 100 cc (1 g/kg). Poisoning with methanol may be accidental or intentional. There have been epidemics of methanol toxicity in cases where illicit whiskey has been sold to large populations or when the less expensive methanol was substituted for ethanol in drinks.

    Once methanol is absorbed it is rapidly distributed in the body water with peak blood levels occurring in about 30 to 90 minutes after exposure. If ethanol is not present 2-5% of the methanol is excreted unchanged by the kidneys and a small amount is eliminated by the lungs. At low blood levels the half-life of methanol is 2-3 hours. Once the blood levels rise above 300 mg/dl, the enzymes that metabolize methanol become saturated and the elimination half-life increases to 27 hours. When this happens a greater amount of the methanol is eliminated unchanged by the lungs and the kidneys. During therapy with ethanol the half-life of methanol becomes 30-52 hours.

    Methanol itself may cause inebriation but by itself in almost completely non-toxic. The methanol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase to formaldehyde and then to formic acid. Clinical findings correlate better with formic acid levels than with methanol levels. It is these two metabolites that cause toxicity with formic acid being more responsible. It is the formic acid that causes the profound metabolic acidosis that is typical of methanol poisoning. The overall mortality of methanol poisoning is approximately 20% and among survivors the rate of permanent visual impairment is 20-25%.

    1. Re:Methyl alcohol by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

      Heh. Reminds me of an accident that occured in a lab a friend of mine worked in a few years back. An undergraduate was pulling a 5-liter bottle of methanol off the (top!!) shelf of the reagent cabinet, slipped, and dumped the whole bottle on her head. A grad student ran back to his desk and pulled out a fifth of vodka from a drawer, handed it to the undergrad and yelled "DRINK!" then got to his car and drove her to the emergency room. Luckily she had just recently turned 21. Was back at work the next week, too.

    2. Re:Methyl alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the few therapeutic uses of regular alcohol is in treating methanol (and ethylene glycol) poisining. All the alcohol dehydrogenase (an enzyme) in your body will be busy with the regular booze and won't convert the methanol to a more nasty chemical.

      What's more interesting is that humans have an enzyme (alcohol dehydrogenase) that no other animal has.

      We've been drinking booze for a long time (evolution-wise).

  26. Start lobbying Congress now... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I can see where these fuel cells will find their way onto the "Prohibited Items" list at airports all over the USA.

    As it stands, even simple Bic lighters are prohibited and will be confiscated from all checked baggage... I can only imagine what they'd do with a methanol cartridge.

    1. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      I can only imagine what they'd do with a methanol cartridge

      Um... confiscate it too? What else is there to imagine? I suppose they could high-five each other, have everybody over for a methanol party, go blind because they never can remember if its ethanol or methanol that's safe to drink...

      Laptop manufacturers might as well dream up a laptop powered by U-235 (single charge might last 500 yrs) as far as airport acceptability is concerned.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    2. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lighters are not prohibited. Just FYI

    3. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Bic's are prohibited? What about steal wool and a 9 volt battery? Stick the wool in the drink you're served and touch the wool with the battery terminals and you'll get a nice little fire going.

      I'm sure I could think of dozens, or hundreds, of ways to do mre damage with innocent items than with a Bic lighter. Doh.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by firebee · · Score: 1

      From all checked baggage, yes -- that's been the rule for as long as I can remember. But have they changed the rule about "smoking materials carried on your person" that would seem to allow lighters? Oddly enough, I don't pay much attention to the rules on flammable materials in planes, but my recollection is that you can carry lighters and other personal-type flammable things in your carryon.

    5. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already been approved by the FAA.

    6. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God fucking damn it you're a retard.

      EVERY TIME, without fail, that a laptop fuel cell article gets posted, you and a thousand fucking retards come out and mention airplanes.

      They're approved for air travel, and they have been for months. SHUT UP.

      Not only that, but you think it's so fashionable to point out safety concerns like a good scared little american. God damn it, live your life and stop worrying about tiny bottles of alcohol.

      Fucking moron.

    7. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the fire-inducing propety of the lighter that is the problem... I think it's the posibility of making a small bomb/poison with numerous lighters full of unknown chemicals.

      That said, it's a very stupid security precaution to say the least.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by achurch · · Score: 1

      As the complexity of technology increases, so does the number of people who don't have a clue but pretend to anyway. I'm waiting for the day they decide to ban dihydrogen oxide...

    9. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by qqtortqq · · Score: 1

      You can bring a lighter in your checked baggage, as well as in your carry on stuff. TSA is lightening up a bit.

    10. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by RALE007 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Laptop manufacturers might as well dream up a laptop powered by U-235"

      I'm curious as to the real pro's and con's of that (sarcastic) suggestion. Radioactive materials are already present in many products, U-235 can already be aquired by any bad guy with half a brain or a deep enough wallet, so why not? I (honestly) would love to hear all the reaons why I'm stupid for asking "why not?". I'm not trolling I really mean it, someone enlighten me on something I don't know much about.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    11. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Hmmm...

      Con's:

      1) Shielding alone for the uranium, would turn the battery into a luggable, defeating the purpose of having a laptop.

      2) Landfills filling up with NiCad batteries is bad enough, but Uranium?

      3) People are idiots. A good percentage of them would unfoolproof the foolproof protections and cause a mini China Syndrome while trying to boot Windows.i

      4) Expensive. Can you imagine how much it would cost? How much does U-235 cost per ounce?

      Pro's:

      1) A single charge would probably outlast the usable lifetime of the laptop, and would also probably outlast your usable lifetime.

      2) Bragging rights. "How long does your laptop last? 4 hours? Hah. Mine lasts 4 centuries." OK, that really stems from 1).

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    12. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that this is really a serious discussion, but you need to add heat to your con's. This would be a thermal pile, and that's a lot more heat than a fuel cell or battery, which are already too hot.

    13. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by galen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The whole point of banning bic-type lighters in checked baggage is that under the low pressure conditions that exist in the cargo hold they can explode or leak. They've never been disallowed in carry-on because the cabin is pressurized. It's just common sense.

    14. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Lighters ARE prohibited in checked baggage. You can carry them on though.

    15. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by RALE007 · · Score: 1

      First of all, (obviously) I am not a scientist nor do I have any nuclear power background knowledge (aka I'm an idiot talking about something he knows nothing about). The comment I originally replied to had made the sarcastic statement of "why not power laptops using U-235". Ideas that think out of the box can be intriging even if they are unreasonable and I found that sarcastic statement intriging. It made me think, what if some NEC lab monkey really wanted to try to find a way to use U-235?

      My understanding of nuclear power may be way off (I have never read into it much nor had much of a great desire for an indepth understanding until now). If I recall correctly (that's a big *if*) nuclear power works by using a radioactive material to heat water, causing it to expand and force its way through a conduit moving a turbine that's hooked up to generator (or something along those lines, this is a very old memory I could be way off). Lets say we make a mini reactor that works under the same principle, but on a much smaller scale with much lower core temperatures. If I recall, a meltdown at a nuclear power plant would entail the loss of coolant to the core, allowing the radioactive material to get so hot as to melt it's way out of it's protective containment, releasing a spew of radioactive steam on anyone unlucky enough to be within a few hundred miles.

      If we made a mini reactor, it would be very small with a core much cooler than its big brother power plants. Only enough to heat to force a small amount of water through a small generator, down a cooling line, and through to the core again would be necessary. If a minimal amount of U -235 was used, and lets say it was mixed together with lead into a tiny brick, you'd just get a small, perpetually warm brick of lead with a little bit of Uranium mixed in. The item would not be warm enough to make a mini melt down, and even if taken outside of shielding, it would only be harmful because of the rays given off (gamma?), but the U - 235 or U - 235 contanimated materials would not disperse, boil off, blow up, or whatever as in a China Syndrome scenerio.

      Now that raises the question in my mind, how much shielding really would be needed for a minimal amount of Uranium already mixed into a tiny lead brick? If I recall correctly, isn't the most harmful radiation given off by Uranium gamma rays? and they can travel through a significant amount of lead correct? So a lot of shielding is required to stop all harmful radiation. My question now is, if we only use a tiny bit of Uranium, how much harmful radiation is it giving off? A large enough amount to give me cancer after two hours of laptop use? Or a minimal amount like the cell phone in my pocket. Could minimal shielding be used to keep harmful rays within safety tolerance? I sure don't know the answers, and I don't necessarily expect you to either, I'm just thinking about "what if's".

      As far as "do I know how much an ounce of U - 235 would cost?" I have no clue. Even though it is safe to assume it is a very expensive material, our best case scenerio model is saying we'll only need a minimal amount. Yes our supply of power would require this expensive compenent, but the Methanol batties of the original story also require a very expensive compenent as a catalyst, platinum. Maybe the amount of Uranium would be minimal like the amount of platinum in the methonal, and would not make the cost of the device unaffordable. (Wishful thinking k?)

      So lets say we get to the point of having a mini reactor, too cool for meltdown, warm enough to create enough power for a device such as a laptop, with a safe and tolerable amount of harmful radiation escaping, small and light enough for convenient use, at a price worth paying for a lifetime of power from our device. The last concern (I believe?) was having U - 235 in land fills is worse than batteries.

      Well, if the U - 235 is so valuable, why wouldn't it just be recycled instead of thrown into a landfill? Who says it will ever be throw

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    16. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      [the uranium is] back in the earth where it came from, just maybe not the exact same spot as it's original home.

      As to the landfill thing, I believe Uranium is a metal, denser than lead, is smelted from uranium ore, which contains low concentrations of uranium oxide. The pure uranium metal does not occur in nature, any more than iron does. Iron oxide (rust) but not iron.

      I have heard that depleted uranium is used in armor piercing rounds by the US military. There have been some questions (and few answers) about how healthy this practice is for friendly troops.

      It would seem to me that placing concentrated sources of uranium in a landfill would be distinctly unhealthy, both for those with a house built on top, and those downstream of the runoff.

      Interesting thing is, radon gas is a by-product of radioactive decay, usually in granite formations. You could probably find at least a dozen uranium atoms in every ton of granite.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    17. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by RALE007 · · Score: 1

      Ok, you have some fair points, but I disagree with some of them.

      Take a magnet, go outside, and rub it around in some loose dirt or sand then look at it. There, you have just discovered naturally occurring iron. True it is not 100% pure iron but it is most definitely ore rich in pure iron. It would have to be smelted to get impurities out, but I do not believe what's sticking to your magnet is iron oxide. Smelting the ore does not change it's chemical composition (right?), it simply separates the pure iron from all the other useless junk it's bonded with. I'm pretty sure the liquid iron deep in the bowels of the earth that create our lovely magnetic solar radiation shield (and powers nifty compasses) is not iron oxide. Maybe I'm wrong, if so I've had a misconception about iron my whole life.

      Uranium *is* a metal, and yes it is denser than lead. The depleted uranium ammunition (most notably used by the A-10 "Warthog") is assumed to have health risk factors, and it has even been suggested that the depleted uranium ammunition is the culprit behind the "Gulf War Syndrome" that so many veterans seem to be plagued with. I can't think of a better word, but I would assume it's due to the "ingestion" of Uranium particles thrown into the air when a round flies into the ground / armor plated tank / whatever. Getting a radioactively decaying substance permanently in your body is a bad idea. (Going back to my mini reactor for a laptop rant, it'd be just as bad for you to grind up the Uranium/Lead brick and eat it / inhale it / try to make pot brownies out of it). Radioactive substances, if I recall correctly, chemically bond with your bodies skeleton, ensuring you with a (shortened) lifetime of setting off Geiger counters as a bar trick to pick up on chics. (With uranium in your body, pick up on all the girls you can, your earthly time is limited and your soldier will be firing blanks anyways).

      Concentrating Uranium within a small localized area such as a landfill probably would be bad, you have a very good point on the run off comment, but I still (wrongly?) stand by my stance that additional radioactive material would not be introduced to our planet as a whole, but it may definitely be dangerous to localize so much within a small space.

      If my thoughts are wrong please correct me and thank you for the response and insight.

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    18. Re:Start lobbying Congress now... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      ...stand by my stance that additional radioactive material would not be introduced to our planet as a whole, but it may definitely be dangerous to localize so much within a small space.

      Exactly my point. All elements present on/in the planet, will continue to be so. It's the artificial localization and concentration that concerns me. As well as the synthesis of certain compounds which would almost never occur in nature, at least in harmful concentrations. (So-called man-made chemicals. Incidentally, some people think that because something is "natural" or "organic", its good, or at least safe for you. Heh. Poison mushrooms are organic. Nuff said.)

      As to iron oxide reacting to a magnet, this is the very basis for the operation of audio tape equipment. Also, there may well be elemental iron at the earth's core, but iron, wherever exposed to oxygen, forms iron oxide, absolutely. Elemental iron, when found in nature, has never been so exposed.

      The use of depleted uranium may be found in the coming decades to be as foolish health-wise as the careless application of mercury as a decoration by the "mad hatters" of the 19th century. It is also a sobering thought that as late as the 1950's, visionaries dreamed of houses and even cars powered by nuclear energy.

      On a side note, most (all, maybe?) smoke detectors use a small amount of radioactive material to operate, though not as a power source. Mine has Americium. What's to keep an industrious terrorist from ordering thousands of smoke detectors, harvesting this radioactive stuff, and making a dirty bomb?

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  27. Yeah, methanol fueled... by mikeophile · · Score: 1
    V8 dual-hemi, supercharged laptop.

    Does it include a roll-cage?

  28. Well... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    which promise to power electronics ten times longer than the lithium-ion batteries currently in use.

    Let's say the average laptop battery lasts 4-5 hours, as given in a previous iBook example. So that's 40-50 hours.

    How many folks ever need to be in front of a laptop for 40-50 hours?

    1. Re:Well... by mikeophile · · Score: 2, Funny
      "How many folks ever need to be in front of a laptop for 40-50 hours?"

      Welcome to Slashdot!

    2. Re:Well... by SoupaFly · · Score: 1

      What an absurd example. If everything operated based on that logic cell phones would have to be recharged every 6 hours and your watch battery would have to be replaced once a week.

    3. Re:Well... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      Okay, you're out in the field, miles from anything resembling an electical outlet. Do you want to carry around several pounds of heavy batteries, or a pound or two of fuel canisters to power your laptop running your experimental equipment. Or maybe you're on a long-haul flight from New York to Sidney. You can't afford first class, so you're stuck in coach, where there are no data ports. Once again, do you want to bother with the hassle of swapping out batteries halfway through the flight?

      Yes, if you're near an electical outlet at all times, then you probably don't need a fuel cell. But if you're in a situation that you're quite possibly going to have a significant delay in getting to a power source, you're probably going to like the fact that fuel cells promise to provide long life, plus the capability of being able to hot swap without multiple power outlets. Yeah, it's not for everyone, but many people would find such a feature to be of great advantage when heading out onto the field.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  29. In the news ... by Vanieter · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Man dies from carbon monoxide intoxication after using laptop for five straight hours, more at 11"

    1. Re:In the news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CSI writers should be paying attention, there's one-half of an episode in this fuel-cell thing.

    2. Re:In the news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, they will strech it out to atlest ten episodes.

    3. Re:In the news ... by r84x · · Score: 1
      "Man dies from carbon monoxide intoxication after using laptop for five straight hours, more at 11"

      Fuel cells do not "burn" methanol at such a rate as to cause carbon monoxide poisoning, even in a smallish room, if they use a technology similar to this, which I would suspect they do.

      --
      Karma: Can there be a void?

      .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

  30. Sounds Dangerous by Flwyd · · Score: 1

    Running a laptop which has a liquid as poth input and output sounds like a bad idea. I have enough trouble trying to keep my soda away.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  31. It's Been Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is just one of the times a story on a methanol-based laptop was covered.

  32. Finally by poptones · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Nice to see products finally coming about. I wonder how many tons of old batteries go into landfills every year from stuff like portable music players and flashlights? Or camcorders and laptops? The future is getting greener all the time.

    1. Re:Finally by evilviper · · Score: 1

      How often did you throw away your old laptop batteries? The future is getting less-green all the time...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! You know what they say, the future is always greener on the other side. . .

  33. Finally by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Smelly laptops for smelly geeks.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  34. Methane by jinglecat · · Score: 0

    Big Deal

    I run 5+ consecutive hours everyday on methane.

  35. If only they'd make them run on methane! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd have an endless supply of fuel! My laptop would never go down.

  36. Mooooo...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is methanol in any way related to methane?
    If so, the 40 hour time limit could easily be cirumvented by attaching one end of a hose to the rear end of a cow and the other to the notebook.

    1. Re:Mooooo...... by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Not very portable, though.

      To be really mobile, laptop owner would have to be vegeterian. For producing good quality methan, (S)he would also need to apply the following technique when eating:

      1] chew

      2] swallow

      3] repeat (yeah, sucks, i know)

      and to keep farthing all-day-long.

    2. Re:Mooooo...... by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to see you sitting on your cow walking down the street surfing the web on your laptop.

      You: Come on boy! Giddyup! We're not going anywhere!

      Cow: Moooooo!

      And try to get your cow past an airport checkpoint! I'll stick with methanol...

      --
      "Men lie."
      "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
      -Dan Brown
  37. Travel, portability by tyrelb · · Score: 1

    What about travel on airplanes? Lots of people like to bring laptops on airplanes... And what about portability? If your fuel cell runs out and you need a replacement, how easy will it be to replace? Just imagine working late at night when your fuel cell empties.

  38. Maybe for the army by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    These laptops could be good for those of us who go camping or for the army, for researchers who do not have an electrical outlet in close vicinity. Of-course for them to be useful, the fuel cells should last at least 50 hours at a time but for sure not 5. Once they do last for 50-100 hours a case can be made for them to be used by general public.

  39. supercharged by da2 · · Score: 1

    i'm just waiting for some idiot to try and connect N2O or similar to it.

  40. Methanol 101 by dark-br · · Score: 4, Informative

    Methanol (CH303) is the simplest alcohol, containing one carbon atom. It is a colorless, tasteless liquid with a very faint odor and is commonly known as "wood alcohol."

    Methanol is one of a number of fuels that could substitute for gasoline or diesel fuel in passenger cars, light trucks, and heavy-duty trucks and buses.

    It's physical and chemical characteristics result in several inherent advantages as an automotive (or laptop) :) fuel:

    Emissions from methanol engines/laptops are low in reactive hydrocarbons (which form smog) and in toxic compounds. Methanol-fueled trucks and buses emit almost no particulate matter (which cause smoke and odor, and can also be carcinogenic), and much less nitrogen oxides than their diesel-fueled counterparts.

    It can be manufactured from a variety of carbon-based feedstocks such as natural gas, coal, and biomass (e.g., wood). Use of methanol would diversify the country's fuel supply and reduce its dependence on imported petroleum.

    Methanol is much less flammable than gasoline and results in less severe fires when it does ignite.

    It also is a high-octane fuel that offers excellent acceleration and vehicle power.

    With economies of scale, methanol could be produced, distributed, and sold to consumers at prices competitive with gasoline.

    Because of its outstanding performance and fire safety characteristics, methanol is the only fuel used in Indianapolis-type race cars. Following a series of methanol vehicle development and demonstration programs throughout the 1980's, a limited number of methanol passenger cars and buses are now commercially available. There are approximately 14,000 methanol passenger cars in use, mostly in Federal and private fleets, and about 400 methanol buses in daily operation, mostly in California.

    Methanol is used in a number of consumer products, including paint strippers, duplicator fluid, model airplane fuel, and dry gas. Most windshield washer fluids are 50 percent methanol.

    1. Re:Methanol 101 by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 1

      It also is a high-octane fuel that offers excellent acceleration and vehicle power.

      Huh? I was under the impression that octane was an entirely different chemical (C8H18).

      --
      ...just my 2 gil.
    2. Re:Methanol 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also is a high-octane fuel that offers excellent acceleration and vehicle power.

      > Huh? I was under the impression that octane was an entirely different chemical (C8H18).


      Yes and no. There is a chemical called octane - in fact, there are many isomers of n-octane (n is short for normal) that are also called octanes. Some of the isomers of octane burn with much more energy than others. These days, gasoline does contain some octane, but it contains lots of other things: anti-knock agents, detergents, oxygenates and other flammable chemicals. The octane number refers to how much energy you get from burning the gas. The higher the number, the more energy. A high-octane fuel only means that you get more energy when you burn it. Fuel doesn't need to contain octane at all, but the phrase high-octane is still used how much energy is in the fuel. Kerosene (aviation fuel) has a very high octane number, but almost no octane.

      At one time, the octane number referred to the ratio of isomers of octane. There is one isomer of octane (I forget which) which gives off a lot of energy. There is a different isomer of octane that gives very little energy when burned.

      To measure the energy in gasoline, a sample would be burned, and compared to the best and worst octane isomers. An octane number of 80 would mean the energy when burned was equivalent to a mixture of 80% of the best octane and 20% of the worst octane.

      A little more thought will tell you that the slightly higher octane number in "premium" gas (92 compared to 87 or so) means there is a very small energy difference over regular gas. Buy regular gas (unless your engine knocks, but that's another story)!

    3. Re:Methanol 101 by PD · · Score: 1

      And octane doesn't have to be octane when it comes to fuel. It's an octane rating.

    4. Re:Methanol 101 by kavau · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a gift from heaven. Too bad the oil lobby is going to do everything they can to delay the industry-wide adoption of methanol fuel cells. I think the fact that this technology is pioneered by a Japanese company speaks volumes.

    5. Re:Methanol 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post looked all a bit too karma-whoringly familiar.

    6. Re:Methanol 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They won't burn methanol, like race cars, it will be used in a fuel cell.
      And btw, no way this will be allowed on airplanes.

    7. Re:Methanol 101 by Xendarq · · Score: 1

      Methanol is CH3OH, not CH303. Posted for the benefit of the many of you using /. to prepare for your chemistry midterms.

    8. Re:Methanol 101 by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I am a chemist - this is only somewhat accurate.

      There are various isomers of octane. The octane rating on fuel has more to do with ignitition properties than total energy output, however. There are other posts in this thread which are more accurate.

      I would be curious if somebody could post a link to the actual testing methodology. I'm pretty sure that total energy output is not what is measured.

  41. Re:Methyl alcohol (good cut-n-pasting!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  42. Methanol stores - in your area now! by garyok · · Score: 1

    Where do you go to buy methanol? Your local chemist or drugstore? They won't have it, and even if they do they'll make you sign a poisons register and stuff. I suppose you can get a still knocked together and brew your own, but what are the chances you're going to clog up the cell with the funky brewing by-products. I suppose you're supposed to order it from chemical suppliers, but do you really want to wait a couple of days to use your laptop while they mail your order to you?

    If they could get a fuel cell working off butane gas, now I'd buy one of those. Much handier and about a second and a half to fully recharge the cell. That'd be progress. This is a footnote.

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
  43. This is good news... by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 2, Informative

    Already 3 posters that prefer batteries over fuel cell powered laptops. Well, I can't say I disagree that batteries are better, but there are exceptions. There are places where charging a laptop is not possible.

    I'm always going to a little coffee shop where the only power outlet is all the way in the back, so I can't recharge my battery. Now I have a laptop that lasts for about 4 hours between charges, but I can't always show up there with a fully charged battery. Why do I keep going there? Somebody upstairs has an open wireless router. Can you spell free broadband access? :)

    But that's not the only case. I do small tech jobs, that sometimes take more than the 4 hours my battery lasts. It's annoying to alway hunt for a spare outlet. On one of my last jobs the guy had such a jungle of power wires under his desk that I was literally afraid to plug in anywhere..

    And I doubt that the only power source for the laptop would be the methanol fuell cell. You might be able to use a battery or mains instead. But if that isn't the case, running exclusively off methanol is not that expensive.

  44. Windows + Methanol = BIG EXPLOSION! by Bucci.com.br · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine the size of the explosion when windows crashes ?? LB

    1. Re:Windows + Methanol = BIG EXPLOSION! by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      It'll be about half the size of the explosion from when someone tries to put an AMD in it.

  45. An application does exist! by silverhalide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see most people scoff at the idea of buying fuel cell cartridges for their laptop. Well, then this laptop isn't for you -- you have easy access to electricity. This is revolutionary because now you have a portable computer ANYWHERE, and you can recharge it with a little cartridge instead of lugging a huge generator with you.

    Hello military and 3rd world applications. I can see a brand new market -- deploy some these bad boys, set up a wireless access point, and you have an instant internet community with no other power infrastructure.

    This is another step in getting computing power to the third world and closing the digital divide.

    1. Re:An application does exist! by sheldon · · Score: 1

      I can see a brand new market -- deploy some these bad boys, set up a wireless access point, and you have an instant internet community with no other power infrastructure.

      Absolutely! Because when you don't have an electrical power infrastructure, the first thing that is needed are laptop computers connected to the internet! Screw cooking and lighting! Those aren't nearly as important as surfing p0rn!

      I can see the military, scientific and commercial uses for this. But don't kid yourself into thinking this is part of some utopian world achievement. It's not. Computers are a luxury item compared to food, clothing and shelter.

    2. Re:An application does exist! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      First of all, batteries are already "a little cartridge". Just because notebooks often come with rechargeable batteries, doesn't mean you have to have one, and carry a generator around... You could either have disposable notebook batteries, or you could have a large number of rechargeables that you ship back and forth for recharging.

      Besides, it seems to me that rechargeable batteries are a MUCH better option for 3rd world countries... When your chemical cartridge runs out, you can't hook it up to your solar panel to gradually recharge. You MUST go out and pay for a new one. You might as well go into the third world and get them hooked on heroin... It would be just as expensive of an addition.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:An application does exist! by pj737 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that you still have to lug around the fuel. If you're gone in the mountains for a week or two, how much fuel will you need??

      You can't depend on a feasible methanol distribution system of any kind in a third world country.

      A truly autonomous power supply is solar powered. The sun shines everyday, everywhere (except for part of the year in a few high-suicide rate countries) so you'll always have juice and you never have to lug a fuel source around. I'm still waiting for an affordable solar powered solution for laptop mobility. This is TRUE portability.

    4. Re:An application does exist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hello military and 3rd world applications.

      If you're starving, I don't think email is your first priority.

  46. The devil is in the details by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    Fuel cells are certainly a promising technology, and it is no suprise that they will eventually make their way into consumer devices. NEC apparently will offer this model as early as next year, but a few details are missing from the article.

    How much space does the fuel cartridge take up compared with an average laptop battery? How much does the fuel cartridge weigh compared with an average laptop battery? How much is the initial fuel cell cost compared with an average laptop battery? How much is the incremental cost of refilling the fuel cartridge compared with recharging an average laptop battery?

    It gets big points from the geek factor of being the first on your block to have a fuel cell powered laptop, but predicting whether it will 'cell' to more than a few who are desparate to impress requires a lot more information.

    --
    -- Adam
  47. Perfect name... by ncc74656 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...for a methanol-powered notebook:

    Bender.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  48. Why Methanol??? by dtjohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Methanol is a very potent neurotoxin, is relatively volatile, and has a much lower energy storage density than ethanol. Ethanol is relatively non-toxic by comparison (unless you imbibe very heavily), is less volatile, contains much more energy per mass or volume unit, and can be made and distilled to an acceptable grade by just about anyone, anywhere.

    1. Re:Why Methanol??? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      have you considered that fuel cells based on "not hydrogen" need to completely crack the alcohol on the fly. I just guess that being the simpler molecule it would be easier to find a suitable enviroment.

      btw: If you cant danger level, have you ever considered how dangerous lith/ion cells can be?
      Just throw an old on into fire...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Why Methanol??? by mlush · · Score: 1
      Methanol is a very potent neurotoxin, is relatively volatile, and has a much lower energy storage density than ethanol.

      Methanol is not drinkable and therefore is not taxed

  49. screens by da2 · · Score: 1

    so how do we power one or more screens to go with that 40hr PC

  50. UPS by vigilology · · Score: 1

    Perhaps these could be made into cheaper UPSs?

  51. How about a little generalization? by Atario · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instead of developing this strictly for laptops, why not come up with a general-purpose methanol (or other) fuel-cell? One where you could have your choice of plug type, polarity, voltage, and AC or DC? Like one of those omni-usage wall-warts, but without the wall? If it were no bigger than, say, a six-pack, I bet it would be more than useful for travelers of any sort.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:How about a little generalization? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      Coleman makes one; but, it's about the size of a case of soda and requires pure hydrogen (can we say K-bottle). Several other companies are working on small fuel-cells (for cell phones, etc). They're trying to build them into cars. You can go out (right now) and buy fuel-cell based generators (instead of the ubiquitous diesel).

      Where have you been? Well, OK, it'll be a few years before you get the six-pack sized general purpose AC or DC generator; but, it's coming...

  52. Re:They will have to be cheap by phelddagrif · · Score: 1

    If the manufacturers want the mainstream audience to pick up on fuel cell tech, then the cells are going to have to be mighty cheap say 50c each, otherwise the cost of maintenence goes through the roof. If I were getting 200 hours off of a single charge, I don't think that asking a dollar or so is that bad.

    Think of how much electricity is used after recharging your laptop battery 50 times. If they can make fuel cells cheaper than the electricty cost to charge the batteries for equivalent time.

  53. Possible scenarios by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1

    Marathon LAN party? Though the user might crash before the laptop ran out of juice. And if it'll run 40 hours without a recharge, if you use it for 10 hours a day, that's 4 days you don't have to come out of the closet in the guest room at your mother-in-law's house.

  54. I power my body through methamphetamines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this laptop thing is a similar phenomenon.

  55. Kinda suicidal, don't you think? by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

    "Mmm...alcohol fueled computer. One for you, one for me."

    Considering that this computer runs on methanol and not ethanol, that would not be a particulary good idea.

    1. Re:Kinda suicidal, don't you think? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see "The Princess Bride"?

      "Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line... "

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    2. Re:Kinda suicidal, don't you think? by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "Didn't you see "The Princess Bride"?"

      No, haven't seen it. Any methanol-drinking in it?

    3. Re:Kinda suicidal, don't you think? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      You should see it. There's a seen where the hero gives one of the enemy characters a challenge, "To the death."

      He takes the goblets of drink in front of them, hides them behind his back, does something, and presents them back to the enemy with a challenge. "One of these goblets is now poisoned."

      The one for you, one for me thing reminded me of that scene. You should see it. Good movie. I won't spoil the movie by telling you the resolution to THAT one, but then again, you can google it easily enough.

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  56. Should have been ethanol..... by northwind · · Score: 1

    Finally we would have had some fun at work.

  57. Sweet machines! by jdub! · · Score: 1

    Yeah, these machines are sweet, I'm writing this from one right now! *hic*

  58. Yeah! by John+Jorsett · · Score: 3, Funny
    Some might think that fuel cell is the greatest thing since Lithium Ion batteries but its really another way of getting money out of the poor consumer.

    God damn them to hell for offering products to people. Bloody capitalist swine. We'll immolate them on a stack of their own fuel cells! Power to the people! Or not, in this case.

  59. Help - I can't see the machine by northwind · · Score: 1

    Methanol induces blindness.

    That will make for some interesting tech-support calls

    And maybe more Braille keyboards.....

    1. Re:Help - I can't see the machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, and I believe eating today's batteries would... kill you?

  60. Methanol=Liquid, Methane = GAS by Vidiot3k · · Score: 1
    In case you fellers don't know what methanol is...

    1. http://www.afdc.doe.gov/altfuel/met_general.html
  61. Where did you get those numbers? by poptones · · Score: 1
    The fuel cell outputs current, ergo "transforming it" takes a switching power supply - just like the laptop already has. And even a switcher for a home PC doesn't weigh more than a few pounds; take it out of the box and it's not likely to weigh more than a pound or two. And that's for a home unit.

  62. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  63. what is the target market? by u19925 · · Score: 1

    NEC claims 5 hr battery life. those who want this battery life can possibly buy transmeta based computer. you get lower speed and better battery life. how many of you would want Lithium battery and 1 GHz computer vs fuel cell and 2 GHz computer, if they both have same battery life and same cost? i would go with former.

  64. Little old meths drinker, me. by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    Reckon I'll need a bigger screen for when I've emptied the fuel cell.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  65. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you start getting crazy ideas about alcohols for energy, know this: It would take all the farmland in the entire world to supply us with enough corn alcohol to fuel America's cars.

    Our best bet is coal power using scrubbers (no output but Carbon Dioxide and heat) until we find a better source of electricity. Fuel cells in general require poluting the environment heavily or taking of unrenewable resources in order to get any good amount of power (check gasoline fuel cells and the expensive and environmentally costly catalysts for normal cells).

    I doubt very much that this alcohol battery could hold as many joules as a lithium-ion within the same amount of space. Ask yourself how reusable it is as well before you get your hopes up.

    Far be it from me to ever criticize slashdot for being unremarkable..

  66. By-products by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 1
    Does anyone know what the by-rpoducts of the reaction would be? I'm no chemist, but I'm guessing water, carbon dioxide, and probably heat.
    I don't really mind the CO2, but water and more heat with my laptop? I dunno....

    Of course I'm guessing about the reaction and leftovers. Can someone tell me if I'm right or wrong?

    --
    Two Rules For Success:
    1) Never tell people everything you know.
  67. Explosion or Electrocution - take your pick... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Do fuel cells produce gases? Even if they don't under normal circumstances, is it possible for a defective one to produce gases?

    The reason I ask is - a small leak, and a spark, and you've got more to worry about than spilling the expresso on the keyboard.

    Until its proven (and I don't see people combusting at the local Starbucks), I will have a fallback plan:

    1. Get one of those heavy duty backup storage batteries used to jumpstart automobiles (these have 'cigarette lighter' style female plugs on them).
    2. Get a rectifier to change the 12 Volt DC to 120 Volt AC - they come for automobiles with the cigarette lighter style male plugs.
    3. When the laptop starts to die, pull out the backup power source: connect battery to rectifier and plug laptop into rectifier 120 Volt AC outlets - just like being at home, without all the yelling (you could even hide this setup in a backpack - unless, of course, you wanted to use the handy dandy 'jumper cable' attachments for crowd control(tm)).

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Explosion or Electrocution - take your pick... by Kjellander · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do fuel cells produce gases?

      A fuel cell running on methanol produces water and carbon dioxide. The same stuff your body produces btw, but the human body produces other stuff as well (think farts).

      But anything containing methanol might catch fire if the methanol leaks out, yes.

    2. Re:Explosion or Electrocution - take your pick... by volsung · · Score: 1

      Or replace step 2 with: purchase car adapter for my laptop.

    3. Re:Explosion or Electrocution - take your pick... by firebee · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a great idea! I've been thinking lately that it's such a waste to run my CD player off of batteries in the car when I've got a perfectly usable car jack right there. I'll just get one of those inverter thingies and plug the AC adapter into that! ...or not.

  68. Are these fuel cells fart-rechargable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Taco Bell would make a great recharging station.

    1. Re:Are these fuel cells fart-rechargable? by Phishpin · · Score: 1

      Methanol, not Methane.

      --
      -phish
  69. Even better by poptones · · Score: 1
    it's a step toward freeing us all from the grid. There are plenty of people in the US who have to generate their own power because they live halfway up a mountain or ten miles from the nearest grid connection. Once this evolves into a technology capable of supplying higher currents then we can be rid of internal combustion generators in off-grid applications.

    Of course, if the catalyst isn't capable of being "cleaned" or efficiently replaced then it's all just so much more useless crap...

  70. LiIon batteries are just as bad- limited lifetime by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative
    The current range of IBM R40 centrino notebooks can provide you with 4 hours [basoncomputer.com] of battery life.Laptop makers are looking for the high profit margins that ink jet printer manufacturers enjoy. How much will these full cell cartrages cost?

    Guess what? Nobody ever talks about it, but Lithium Ion batteries have a VERY finite lifetime; a FEW(very few) hundred discharge-recharge cycles; every time you discharge the battery, and the more you discharge it- the more of the battery you permanently destroy.

    Companies that make these Lithium Ion cells(no foolin', that square battery contains a whole bunch of cells that are almost exactly AA size) won't sell them to you, of course- why? Because if you overload them, they catch on fire pretty handily, so you have to be a "certified" "solution provider" lest you blow yourself up. Mind you, the battery companies could install thermal/current fuses in the batteries, but they don't want to, because it conveniently lets them control the market, and gives them an avenue of escape if a pack for some camcorder or digicam has serious problems- they can point the finger at that company.

    So, even though Panasonic still makes the cell used by my Powerbook Lombard, and even though you cannot buy new Lombard/Pismo batteries(they're no longer made, period), I can't fix my lombard's battery.

  71. SUCK ON COCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YUO

  72. The Future is...Methane! by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    Flatulence- the smart choice! Talk about a renewable resource! I'm sure we'll all want to own a laptop with a seatbottom power source. Heck, we just convert our cars, and presto! Exxon Stations are replaced by Taco Bells. It gives the term "plugged in" a whole new meaning. Why isn't Nader "behind" this?

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  73. specialist refuelers by nounderscores · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long do you think that the printer ink refillers start marketing knock off fuel cartridges and "self fueler" fuel purifiers which filter camp stove quality wood alcohol into laptop grade fuel?

  74. pasted from www.fuelcelltoday.com by forkboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Direct Methanol Fuel Cells (DMFC)

    The direct methanol fuel cell is a variant of the PEM fuel cellwhich uses methanol directly without prior reforming. The methanol is converted to carbon dioxide and hydrogen at the anode. The hydrogen then goes on to react with oxygen as in a standard PEM fuel cell.

    Anode Reaction: CH3OH+ H2OCO2 + 6H+ + 6e-

    Cathode Reaction: 3/2O2 + 6H+ + 6e- 3H2O

    Cell Reaction: CH3OH+ 3/2O2CO2 + 2H2O

    These cells are expected to operate at around 120C, which is slightly higher than the standard PEM fuel cell, and give efficiencies of around 40 per cent. One drawback is that the low temperature conversion of methanol to hydrogen and carbon dioxide needs a larger quantity of platinum catalyst than in conventional PEM cells. This increased cost is, however, expected to be more than outweighed by the convenience of using liquid fuel and the ability to function without a reforming unit. The technology behind direct methanol fuel cells is still in the early stages of development but it has been successfully demonstrated powering mobile phones and laptop computers, potential target end uses in future years.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    1. Re:pasted from www.fuelcelltoday.com by Have+Blue · · Score: 1
      These cells are expected to operate at around 120C
      Hmm... Laptops already have fairly serious heat problems, to the point where I cannot use a 12" Powerbook because of the left palm rest. And now the power supply is going to be at 120?
    2. Re:pasted from www.fuelcelltoday.com by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Since water is a byproduct, they may have some sort of condenser built into the fuel cell so that as the water vapor condenses, it cools the cell a bit. Of couse, liquid water draining from the cell may be a bit annoying, so maybe that's not such a hot idea. (no pun)

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:pasted from www.fuelcelltoday.com by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      In this paragraph, it states that these cells operate at a higher temperature than PEM cells, then goes right ahead and states that this LOW temperature requires more platinum than PEM cells. It's worded in such a way as to suggest the writer is kinds fuzzy on his knowledge of fuel cells- Is a lower temperature reaction MORE or LESS efficient, and does lower temperature lead to MORE or LESS catalyst being needed? And finally, is your fuel cell actually low-temperature or high-temperature compared to PEM?

  75. TACO IS HOMOSEXUAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOMOS and ANAL COX are too.

  76. What about the porn industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine methanol powered vibrators.. longer porno shoots and more powerful vibrators.

    or a laptop version of the FUFME

  77. Good Idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have just brought up the idea of the "razor / Razor blade" problem where we'll be sold the fuel cell cheap then scapled on fuel.
    I wonder if there will be fuel cell refill kits available anytime soon...

    I can just see Joe Sixpack drilling a hole in the side of a fuel cell, poring some methanol in it, not sealing it proberly, then getting his balls blown off when his hotter-then-the-center-of-the-sun AMD chip spontaneously ignites the leaking fuel... :)

  78. That's ethanol... by Hobbex · · Score: 3, Funny


    Methanol will just blank out the screen...

  79. Heat and efficiency by StriderA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, but what about heat?

    Reading some information on various fuel cells, it mentions various types, the coolest being the Direct Methanol Fuel Cells (DMFC) which runs at about 120-190 degrees F (about 50-100 deg C) which would require their own heat problems, which are already a big deal with laptops. Aside from all the "what about on airplanes" questions, I'm wondering about how well the laptop will run at those temperatures. They'll have to swap out some components comming standard on laptops nowdays (s-video/etc) in exchange for fans.
    If you want longer battery life, you can get more batteries, so the only real advantage I see is they're safer for the environment in the long run.

    I'm thinking I'll wait until they become more widestream and they have some of those issues worked out before I jump on that wagon.

    --
    "When will this FP stuff stop?" "After the great growing..." "The great growing?" "Yea, when people grow up."
  80. Phew... by Bake · · Score: 1

    Thank god it's not fueled by ethanol.

    If it were fueled by ethanol I'd always come back to the two choices ... Two more hours of laptop time, or get drunk.

  81. Re: yea... downsides though... by op51n · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately batteries are still crap enough that after a certain amount of recharging they develop a memory. Note if your cellphone is of a certain age now it won't have even nearly the life it used to. Now with cellphones nowadays the batteries have tended to become cheaper to replace (I remember mid-90's when to get a new battery for my cell it was going to cost me around £100) at around £30, but laptops as far as I know are still far more expensive to do so for.
    Fuel cells on the other hand won't have such a problem, allowing you a constant and reliable battery life, something I know I would like.

    ALl this doesn't mean I'm on board. I have many doubts about the pricing as someone pointed out, and whether you can top them up yourself or if it's a one off deal each time. But it will have advantages.

  82. Re:LiIon batteries are just as bad- limited lifeti by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

    Do you mean batteries like this?

    I have never had trouble finding batteries for old laptops. If you need one, you can find one no problem.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  83. Re:LiIon batteries are just as bad- limited lifeti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All rechargeable wear out. That's Chemistry.
    As for the Cells I am sure you could find some and Fix the battery. There are places On the Net that will do it for you. Goggle it.
    Li-Ion do not like many things. To much current,Too much voltage, heat, cell imbalance, over discharging. The explode quite mighily when they are unhappy. That is why you can not get them at Radio Shack. Now let me get back to my Battery Charger softwre before before fuel cells make me unemployed.

  84. Propane? by ocie · · Score: 1

    Why not make it use propane? Coleman could come out with a cool looking and rugged computer for camping. When you were done computing, you could detach the canister, hook it up to the stove and make some s'mores.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:Propane? by Bryan_W · · Score: 1

      Or use an AMD and cook s'mores while using the computer

  85. Re:How about reading the article? by koko775 · · Score: 2

    doesn't the site mention a 40-hour version for PCs in 2 years...?

  86. How much do you expect methanol to cost? by MasteroftheVoxel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised at how many slashdotters are suspicious about this technology.

    Methanol is *extremely* cheap to make. We are talking about buying a gallon or two for less than a dollar. Yes, it is flammable but not like gasoline. There isn't a risk of explosion. Do you ever worry about your lighter exploding in your pocket? Yes, its poisonous but only if you drink it. Ever drink glass cleaner or windshield wiper fluid? Didn't think so. Its sort of like that. Its much worse to drink gasoline (we use it all the time in cars and how many people are poisoned by that?) and opening a laptop Lithium-ion or Nicad battery and eating the contents is far worse.

    I'm surprised at how happy people are with laptop batter performance these days. You are lucky to get 4 hours, especially if the battery is old. YOu can get more, but the batteries get very heavy! Methanol, on the other hand, is quite light.

    1. Re:How much do you expect methanol to cost? by trouser · · Score: 1

      Ever drink glass cleaner or windshield wiper fluid?

      ummm.....yes.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    2. Re:How much do you expect methanol to cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good... but I'm not convinced yet. Are you sure that cheap dollar-a-gallon methanol is pure enough for a fuel cell?

    3. Re:How much do you expect methanol to cost? by pj737 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, I never drank windshield wiper fluid or glass cleaner but I know I got it on my hands before. As for methanol, you don't wan't any of this stuff getting on your skin. Methanol is readily absorbed through the skin or mucus membranes. Once in the body it is converted by the liver to formaldehyde, a very poisonous chemical. And who the hell opens up there Li-Ion batteries? You're in a pipedream thinking you can just grab a gallon milk jug filled with methanol to fill your laptop fuel tank. If this ever becomes reality, you'll be buying specially made and approved cartridges or canisters (sold by laptop top co's) to refill your laptop. They'll be at least 10 times pricier per ml than your cheapo plastic jug o methanol. But check eBay for special methanol refill jugs for 1/4 the price, but like those cheapo ink refill kits, your laptop may not work!

    4. Re:How much do you expect methanol to cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And who the hell opens up there Li-Ion batteries?

      Nerds do. If they existed when I was a teen, I would have. I open mercury batteries. Fun stuff. I probably still have higher than average levels in my body.

  87. From the article... by bad_fx · · Score: 1

    Fuel cells produce electricity without generating pollutants, through an electrochemical reaction that uses oxygen and hydrogen.

    Hmm, call me sceptical, but I'd think it'll still generate waste...

    The two ways they can distribute the fuel (I assume) is in a cartridge of some type which then gets thrown away when empty - which would be considered a pollutant right? Or in some sort of packaging which you then then use to refill your fuel cell - and the packaging of *that* then becomes a pollutant.

  88. Where does the water vapor go? by jmuzic1 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the combustion of methanol produce water vapor and carbon dioxide?

    1. Re:Where does the water vapor go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no combustion. There is a small amount of water produced, which may either be evaporated, or, more likely, will be RECYCLED inside the unit to DILUTE the methanol.

  89. Hemp is better and will work in a Diesel engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biodiesel will work in modern diesel engines with NO modifications. The technology does exist to shift away from petroleum.

    www.biodiesel.org
    www.hempcar.org

  90. Allowed on planes? No. by r84x · · Score: 1
    "As to flying on planes and such, they are making sure the [sic] are approved before releasing them to the public."

    You know, nail clippers are "approved" and they snatch those before you go on a plane...

    I cannot believe that "they" will ever allow a flammable substance such as methanol onto our airlines.

    And yes, I realize that hard liqour is flammable and served on planes, but it is not nearly as volatile as pure methanol is.

    --
    Karma: Can there be a void?

    .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    1. Re:Allowed on planes? No. by oolon · · Score: 1

      Depends really, if you could design a casing that when ruptured neturalising all the methanol that would be one option. Another option would be to allow them to be flown "empty", and allow people to plugin laptops (A much more useful thing for long haul anyway) also then they could sell you more methanol at the other end... It was not long ago people where not allowed to use computers at all on planes, if the business customers (high value) demands it, it will be made to happen some how. If this is the only way to get a "battery" that still works to anything like its full lifetime 3 months after purchance, it will happen.

      James

    2. Re:Allowed on planes? No. by in7ane · · Score: 1

      How about butane in lighters? The airlines allow lighters onboard without any problems.

      Maybe it will come down to lobbying by the manufacturers though to get the cells approved on planes

      But I can't resists... imagine a bunch of terrorists with a beowulf cluster of those on a plane

  91. Any ethanol-based model ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Waiter, two shots for me and three for my laptop!

    Darling, the six-pack in the fridge is not for me - it is for my notebook, believe me!

    Honey - I had to go to the bar - my laptop run out
    of fuel ...

  92. How about Vodka fuel cell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way, you can go into any bar and order a round of drinks for all the laptops.

  93. I can see it now - The Official Laptop of NASCAR by Whizzmo2 · · Score: 1

    Subj sez it all

  94. High-octane fuel != C8H18 by dark-br · · Score: 3, Informative

    Octane rating is how its called the fuel resistance to detonation.

    The octane rating of a fuel is what most people are familiar with, but there seems to be a lot of confusion surrounding it. In simple terms the octane number you see at the pump is the average of two octane numbers; the Research Octane Number (RON) and the Motor Octane Number (MON) or (RON + MON) / 2. This final octane number is sometimes referred to as the Anti Knock Index or AKI. This pump octane number is a measure of the anti- knock characteristics of a given fuel.

    MON and RON are determined by standardized ASTM laboratory tests. The details of the tests are not as important as what they mean in terms of performance. Low to medium-speed knock characteristics are determined by the Research (RON) method, while high-speed and partial throttle heavy load knock characteristics are determined by the Motor (MON) method. MON testing is conducted under more stringent conditions with the timing on the test engine advanced and run with a higher inlet air temperature, so the MON number tends to be lower but also more valid for high-performance applications. There are a number of more valid tests that have been developed to determine the anti-knock characteristics of fuels used in high performance engines, but the aren't in general use at this point so we are stuck with the old reliable pump octane number.

  95. On an airplane? by rossz · · Score: 1

    I bet Homeland Security (aka the Gestapo) won't allow these on a flight.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  96. Substitute Fuel on Planes? by 6e7a · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would be cool if we could use ethanol instead of methanol in a pinch. Imagine flying long distances in coach class. You could buy bottles of booze and keep your laptop going indefinitely!

    "Excuse me, what's the highest proof you sell on this flight?" :-)

  97. Methadone fueled? by sakusha · · Score: 1

    I must need new eyeglasses, I could've sworn that headline said "methadone-fueled."

  98. Coffee, Tea, or Me? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Stewardess: And what will you have, sir?

    Passanger: I'll have a nice glass of Bordeaux, and my laptop will have a vodka straight-up.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  99. Re:Change the OS, not the battery... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I think you have your 'insight' confused with your 'idiocy'. If you have Windows 2000 crashing daily then you, sir, are:

    1. An Idiot who can't configure his system
    2. Using obsolete hardware
    3. All of the above


    Windows 2000 and XP run continuously for VERY long without needing to be restarted. Here's my home server's uptime...
    System Up Time: 111 Days, 23 Hours, 51 Minutes, 24 Seconds
    Wow, looky there. Now lets not make this into one of those "My uptime/penis is bigger then your uptime/penis" wars, but just come away knowing that you, and the original comment are nothing but illinformed trolls.
  100. 2Fast 2Furious by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    I'll wait for the nitrous version and then install a rear wing and a big exhaust tip (to make it sound faster).

    1. Re:2Fast 2Furious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.spymac.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo= 33769&papass=&sort=1&thecat=500

  101. No problem... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    ...if you fly your own airplane.

    Seriously, all you geeks out there need to try having a few flying lessons. We need more private pilots in this country. If you've got the "right stuff" you owe it to yourself to learn how to fly. And no, you don't have to be rich either. I only make about $35k per year and I could even afford to buy my own single engine airplane. A modest one only costs as much as a new Chevy pickup truck and is a hell of a lot more fun.

    1. Re:No problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We need more private pilots in this country.

      Why?

    2. Re:No problem... by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      So many buildings... So few pilots...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    3. Re:No problem... by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      Seriously, all you geeks out there need to try having a few flying lessons.

      What he said. Really. Turn the computer off, go to your nearest small airfield, and get yourself a trial lesson booked. Then book more lessons and go for a private pilot licence. Learn to navigate by map, compass, stopwatch and what you can see out of the canopy. Get a life beyond bloody computers.

      Flying rules, and I cannot recommend it enough!

      Flying rules.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  102. Why not ethanol ? by ThomasFlip · · Score: 1

    Methanol is one of the most toxic liquids around. Why wouldn't NEC develope an ethanol based fuel cell which could potentially run on vodka or rubbing alcohol ? Does one less carbon molecule produce that much more electricity ?

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    1. Re:Why not ethanol ? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Because Ethanol is controlled by the ATF (at the federal level) and states ABC laws; and by law (in America) has special taxes applied to it. Methanol is therefor cheaper.

    2. Re:Why not ethanol ? by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      As long as you spike the ethanol with something that makes humans sick (like they do with the lab supply products) it ISN'T controlled by the ATF.

  103. AIRPORT: DUMP YOU METHANOL HERE by wukie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well you can forget about boarding an airplane with a flammable liquid for starters.

    As for the printer industry. If your stupid enough to go for the cheapest printer without researching the TCO, well you deserve what you get!

    Competition will force at least some of the manufacturers to make their cartridges refillable. The rest will attract the "chumps" as the printer industry and mobile phone carriers still do.

    1. Re:AIRPORT: DUMP YOU METHANOL HERE by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well, when you board the plane you switch to an ethanol fuel cell which works on the free alcoholic drinks ;).

      One for PC, one for me, one for PC, one for me.

      Tell the flight attendants that you need the expensive stuff coz it has a lot less of the nasty bits that could poison your fuel cell catalyst...

      --
    2. Re:AIRPORT: DUMP YOU METHANOL HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the FAA has already approved the cartridges according to an NPR show I heard a few months ago. They are going to be less flammable than a shot bottle of vodka, like the one's in first class.

  104. Obligatory lame alcohol joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey guys, just checking in to post some lame joke about how MY COMPUTAR WILL RUN ON ALOCOHOL AND SO DO I! LOLERS, ONE FOR YOU, ONE FOR ME! even though ingesting methanol will blind and kill a human being. Hey, it ends in "anol", it's probably the same thing; it can't be that different! So wish me luck as I embark upon this journey of terrible humor at the expense of my dignity.

    Am I rite guys?

  105. Alcohol powered computers by BillLeeLee · · Score: 1

    Woo, alcohol is the next step in computing...FLAMMABLE COMPUTERS.

    --
    www.google.com
  106. Re:LiIon batteries are just as bad- limited lifeti by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

    So, even though Panasonic still makes the cell used by my Powerbook Lombard, and even though you cannot buy new Lombard/Pismo batteries(they're no longer made, period), I can't fix my lombard's battery.

    I too atempted to order Panasonic cells to repair my Thinkpad 770 battery. No luck - they're sold for "approved applications" only. I have to say it's absolute bullshit. LI-ion batteries last me about 14 months.

  107. Car Battery by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

    My laptop runs on an old car battery when I run it out on the back porch. It isn't much of a laptop anymore, of course. I bought it at a bankruptcy auction for a dollar and I'm just too cheap to round up the actual 'power pack' for it, or spend the huge amount for a replacement NiMH battery. So I tore it open, put on a common 1/8" audio jack to feed in the voltage, and it runs happily now on whatever 12 volt supply I feed it.

    I'm looking for a tiny enough distro of Linux to put on it that has actual features, i.e. a C compiler and vi at a minimum. It's only a 386SX-25 and it only has 4 megs of RAM.

  108. self-defeating announcements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    plans to introduce a computer with a fuel-cell system able to run for five consecutive hours on a single cartridge of methanol fuel, but also plans to make a PC within two years that can run continuously for as long as 40 hours

    So, everyone will wait for the 40-hour model, so the 5-hour model won't sell, so the 40-hour model won't get developed.

  109. 7-10 years out, minimum... by lievenl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, it sounds cool to any of us nerd types. But is this really ever going to be useful outside of niche markets like the military?

    Currently, you can get several hours of battery life off a system that you can recharge using outlets that are spaced roughly ten feet apart across the entire industrialized world.

    For fuel cells, you need cartridges (after all, no mainstream user is going to go pouring methanol into their computers themselves). That means a serious distribution infrastructure, because without that little cartridge your system is dead (well, we'll assume it will always run off AC in a pinch). You need vending machines, a good proportion of electronics or grocery stores and Kwik-E-Marts, etc., all stocking a standardized set of cartridge sizes.

    How many hours does your system need to run for this inconvenience level to be worth it? Consider your TV remote or some other non-rechargeable gizmo. Not 5 hours, and I'd say not 40 either. More like a month.

    And how long before airlines say "Sure, it's only a few hundred degree heating element, a volatile liquid, and a system designed to work at sea level. C'mon in!"

    It's challenging to look past the thrill of a new solution to the practical side. I'm sure there are solutions to the problems I listed, but it's all years off yet.

    1. Re:7-10 years out, minimum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This baloney is not insightful, it's with head in sand.

      How can you overlook the advantages?
      Are you so blinded by habbit that you don't see how terrible todays batteries are? They are better than in the past but not better enough. They are the bottleneck of mobile electrics and mobile computing.
      If you could buy just one 'battery', but then you could instantly 'recharge' it by refilling it with a cheap commodity fuel, imagine what that would mean.

      You could easily carry enough fuel to run your laptop for a LONG TIME.

      If you think this won't be happening for 7-10 years, you must think the multitude of companies which claim to be releasing such products sooner than that are lying. This this is proven technology, I don't know why you would think that.

      Head in the sand?

    2. Re:7-10 years out, minimum... by confused+one · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This rated Insightful?

      And how long before airlines say ...

      It's already been approved by the FAA (read previous posts).

      How many hours does your system need to run for this inconvenience level to be worth it?

      It's intended for energy intensive systems like laptops, cell phones, mobile radios, cars, etc.

      Currently, you can get several hours of battery life off a system that you can recharge using outlets that are spaced roughly ten feet apart across the entire industrialized world.

      You don't get outside much do you? They're not 10 feet apart outside your office. Go check.

    3. Re:7-10 years out, minimum... by lievenl · · Score: 1

      It's intended for energy intensive systems like laptops, cell phones, mobile radios, cars, etc.

      Well, yes. My TV remote analogy was because alkalines are rather like fuel cells -- you have to go buy new ones when they die. The less convenient recharge means the time between recharges needs to be longer to offset that. A couple of times longer than a conventional laptop battery isn't enough.

      You don't get outside much do you? They're not 10 feet apart outside your office. Go check.

      I'm a triathlete. Come cycling with me, we'll see who gets furthest from the office... :) But I wasn't talking about your use or my use, I realize there will be niche markets for this tech. I was thinking of average consumers and mainstream adoption. If life brings me within range of an outlet after a few hours of laptop use, and it does, then that's even more true of most other users. That's better than a bag full of methanol cells.

  110. Does nobody notice that we are walking in-place??? by evilviper · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You know, battery life on notebooks really bugs me... No matter what advancements in battery technology there is, no matter how many energy saving features (eg. ACPI) there are, battery life stays very close to the 3 hour mark...

    Why the hell do they keep doing that??? It's like notebook makers all get together and say: "With this new technology, we can double the run-time of our notebooks... Better make the battery half as large..." Is this some sort of scam to get people to buy PDAs? My 486 notebook ran just as long as my brand-new notebook! Why don't manufacturers even try to increase the battery life?

    Better yet, why should I get this new technology, when it's just going to have approximately the same battery life as the oldest notebooks? I know they are promising 5 hours, but I'd bet they'll reduce that to 3-4 hours by time they hit shelves, and I bet the real-life batter time is closer to 3 hours as well...

    Maybe it's just that I'm the only one on the planet that wants a notebook that will work longer than 3 hours between recharges??? Must not be, because Sony seems to be doing well with their double-battery notebooks (hot-swapable), so somebody else must want longer life. Why not reduce the power drain for notebook components rather than going to the fastest technology when it is just effecient enough to allow you to maintain the same run-times?

    You know, it's time I opened my own computer company just to do this all-too-obvious stuff... VCs welcome!

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  111. old batteries? by poptones · · Score: 1
    What are you talking about? I've had at least three laptops become utterly useless because their batteries expired and new ones too expensive to justify replacement. That means not only did the laptops go to the landfill, their battery packs (including the extras bought when they were new) went with them.

    Apparently you think rechargeable batteries last forever? I've sent three laptops that would still be in use today to the landfill because rechargeable batteries DON'T last and the computer won't work (even plugged into the wall) once the batteries badly degrade. And if these fuel cells prove to be rechargeable indefinitely (or long nough to justify maintenance) then they might actually be worth keeping even AFTER the appliance they power goes to the landfill.

    1. Re:old batteries? by pj737 · · Score: 1
      rechargeable batteries DON'T last and the computer won't work (even plugged into the wall) once the batteries badly degrade. And if these fuel cells prove to be rechargeable indefinitely (or long nough to justify maintenance) then they might actually be worth keeping even AFTER the appliance they power goes to the landfill.

      If your laptop doesn't work even with it plugged into your AC adapter, it has nothing to do with the battery. NOTHING. ALL laptops are powered directly by the DC power coming from the AC adapter. In fact, some have no protection (not even a diode) between the power supply and your motherboard. Trust me, I fried a few laptops when messing with portable power supplies (reverse current, overvoltage, stuff like that...) If the battery is fully charged and your computer is plugged into the holes in your wall, the laptop is completely bypassed.

      Fuel cells don't last forever. In fact most of the prototypes now being tested are good for 500 hours. A Li-Ion battery is usually good for 1000-1500+ hours. And, there is waste involved with fuel cell systems. In fact, the waste will be MUCH greater than that produced by faulty or expired batteries caused by natural death. Methanol will be provided in little containers which you THROW AWAY. Moreover, we are not using NiCads anymore. Li-Ion is easily recyclable and relatively benign to the environment even if disposed of improperly. And think of all the gas you'll be wasting in your full-sized SUV running to the local Quickie Mart for a canister of laptop go-go juice. autonomous everything!!

    2. Re:old batteries? by poptones · · Score: 1
      If your laptop doesn't work even with it plugged into your AC adapter, it has nothing to do with the battery. NOTHING. ALL laptops are powered directly by the DC power coming from the AC adapter.

      I suggest you consult a few laptop manuals before casting such foolhardy generalizations. Many older laptops are absolutely NOT "powered directly by the DC power" - the DC adapter simply charges the battery, which THEN powers the laptop. The batteries are used as a glorified capacitor for a "brick" that is unable to supply the peak current needed to startup the computer. If the battery has a high ESR it will never be able to supply this current required by the laptop, which means it never even makes it to the boot screen.

      This is not an uncommon problem. I suggest you ask a few people who have actually owned them - I'm sure you'll find more than a few who have had the same problem with their old laptops.

      In fact, the waste will be MUCH greater than that produced by faulty or expired batteries caused by natural death.

      I see your lips moving, but you don't seem to be saying much. Got anything at all to beef up this assertion? Given we are talking about systems that aren't even in production yet, you've got some real 'splainin' to do, Lucy.

      Li-ion batteries ALSO fail. Sometimes they don't even last as long as nicads - but they have higher power density than nicads so everyone uses them. And a small plastic container in a landfill is a helluva lot more benign than he stuff in a battery.

    3. Re:old batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a small plastic container in a landfill is a helluva lot more benign than he stuff in a battery.

      What about 100 small plastic containers?

    4. Re:old batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't say I knew much about your old laptops, but I've had a different experience. When a battery goes bad, yes the laptop will not boot, but if I remove the battery, it boots fine.

      In my entire life, I've never seen a laptop that wouldn't boot without a battery (on AC). I've used a lot of laptops. I've even used a Tadpole (Sparc).

    5. Re:old batteries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to think that 1 battery full of whatever toxic shit they're made of would be worse than 100 little plastic containers.

    6. Re:old batteries? by pj737 · · Score: 1
      Well, I've taken apart approx 40 laptops in my time. From Compaq's to Vaio's. Never have I come across a wall rat that fed the battery directly without a means to power the laptop. Manuals give little info about the wiring diagram of a computer. In fact, I have never come across a manual that explained the principle behind power supply for the laptop. Perhaps you are talking about much older laptops (pre-94') that operate solely off the battery. I know for fact that today, not a single laptop operates ONLY with the battery connected. Most Li-Ion batteries will have a reduced life cycle even if the battery is discharged 10-20%. Li-Ion does not have the same operating characteristics as PbA type or NiCad. These batteries prefer a very shallow discharge ( Most Li-Ion batteries today only become shot (i.e. produces zero power) once the battery reaches a VERY low voltage - usually I'd surmise that 30-40% of all discarded Li-Ion batteries are still good for another 200+ cycles to at least 75% of nominal (as new) charge but people don't know how or even if their batts can be revived.

      Generally speaking, methanol is more toxic than any component in a Li-Ion battery. From a disposal standpoint, cartridges will have to be produced to transport and distribute methanol to laptop computers. You can't just have a jug of the stuff and expect to pour it into a laundry-type fabric softener receptacle. They will be recharged by canisters, similar to how butane recharges lighters, or CO2 cartridges replace air in a bicycle tire. One bottle may operate a laptop for 40 ours or so. That's 50+ bottles of waste compared to the waste of one Li-Ion battery. And these cartridges won't be made of simple plastics. They will have to incorporate some kind of metal to engage and connector system, so forget about throwing them in the "plastics" container at your nearest recycling depot. It will end up in one place and one place only - the landfill.

      Li-Ion batteries, on the other hand, have a very ubiquitous network of depository stations all over the country, including Circuit City, Home Depot, Best Buy, WalMart, Sears, etc. http://www.rbrc.org/index.html?sp=true

      All batteries are 100% recycled - from the plastic casing to the cathode and anode, to the gelled electrolyte - everything.

      And yes, I do feel that people will be making special trips to the store to purchase these cartridges because they're all out of juice. Drive a car? There is additional unnecessary environmental onslaught directly connected to a fuel cell powered laptop society.

    7. Re:old batteries? by poptones · · Score: 1
      All batteries are 100% recycled - from the plastic casing to the cathode and anode, to the gelled electrolyte - everything.

      Where the fuck do you come up with this nonsense? Jeezus fucking christ does NO ONE understand fact any more?

      And yes, I do feel that people will be making special trips to the store to purchase these cartridges because they're all out of juice.

      Ignoring your completely made up numbers this is still an absurdly stupid argument. Do you really think these laptops will be made to run only on methanol?

      fucking eh... did your mother have any children that aren't retards?

    8. Re:old batteries? by pj737 · · Score: 1

      Hey JerkFace. Have you anything better to do than ridicule (with zero substance) other's posts? Batteries are essentially 100% recycled when the material is reclaimed and put back into the manufacturing process of anything. Li-Ion, PbA, and NiMH are virtually 100% recyclable. BTW, my numbers are not made up and are completely substantiated. Apparently you can't rebut with any numbers yourself. If I don't post fact what the fu*k is??

  112. methanol fires are invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a big problem. If a fire does start it, it is tough to fight.

    Also, most windshield washer fluids are not 50 percent methanol. They are mostly water and soap. There are alcohol-based washer fluids, but the smell when you use them makes its way into the passenger and is unpleasant.

  113. Re: yea... downsides though... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    Trick I learned is to find the heavily Asian part of town. They'll usually have "import stores" that sell knockoffs of batteries imported from Taiwan for next to nothing. They probably come from the same manufacturer as the name brand batteries, but they cost about a quarter of the price. I used to get vibrating Li+ batteries for my Nokia 5100 (which Nokia didn't even make) for about $10, when Nokia wanted $90 for a Li+ battery that didn't even vibrate. Actually most laptop batteries are just a bunch of Li+ cells connected together. If you can pry open your battery case without destroying it, you could probably replace it (though if you manage to kill yourself doing this, forget I said anything. :)

  114. Don't forget about wet pants by pj737 · · Score: 1

    recombining hydrogen with oxygen produces water. Where does it go???

    1. Re:Don't forget about wet pants by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      recombining hydrogen with oxygen produces water. Where does it go???

      It appears as steam... or water vapour. I dunno - if you've got 4 hours of life in a cell, and the cell holds (say) 500mL, that's not a lot of vapour over 5 hours.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  115. Slashdot moderation phase translation explaination by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Top Secret
    eyes-only

    In order to keep outsiders confused (and hence continue to remain ousiders), we slashdotters like have a little fun with the moderation system at times. So here's a little decoder chart for you.

    If a comment is actually saterical/funny (see grandparent) then the appropriate slashdot bizzaro-world moderation is +1 Insightful.

    If a comment is actually a troll (see great-grandparent)in which the basic premise is "This sux. Because I said so." And then the poster ends up replying to himself with the exact opposite conclusion, then the proper moderation will be +5 Insightful.

    If a comment has a genuinely unique perspective on the situation, then of course the correct moderation is to leave it languishing as-is.

    If you need to do some karma-whoring then do a quick google search on the current topic and post the results. Your diligence will earn you a handsome +5 Informative as your reward.

    Well you get the idea. Further examples are left as an exersize to the reader.

    P.S. Or sometimes we also like to believe that by modding a comment +1 Insightful it will become that way.

    Commit this information to memory. Message will self destruct in 5 seconds. End Transmission...

  116. Too heavy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "The cell, weighing two kilograms when built in a computer, will be available to notebook makers in about two years. It can already operate for five hours on 300 cubic centimeters of methanol, according to the report."

    That works out to about 5 pounds total for the cell and the fuel.

  117. Methane Power! by Quixadhal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Excellent, now I can sit at the local mexican restaurant ALL DAY, and my laptop will keep up as long as the refriend beans and beer keep coming!

  118. Re:Does nobody notice that we are walking in-place by shaggie · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are also doing more stuff with your new notebook which can mean more disk access, bigger LCD screens, etc. Bet you weren't watching dvd movies or divx off your 486 notebook. Also I don't think battery technology has improved much over the years, at least not at the rate that other components have improved. We're still at lithium-ion based, far as I know and i could be way off on this, which began seeing mass usage in the early 90s and I've still seen some nickel-hydride ones in new electronic gadgets.

  119. recharge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the heck is going on? what if you cant recharge? i mean methanol is not just something you can plug into a wall for, i really dont think this idea will be accepted for a LONG time because of that. also, something that should be added to this is that where can you get methanol? will you be carrying a big gas tank around just to "fill up" your computer when it gets "low". i just cant see it happening. sorry NEC

  120. Why not a separate methanol power supply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way, any laptop that now runs from an AC
    adaptor powersupply could be methanol powered.

  121. prices by spike+it · · Score: 1

    Damn! Gas prices have risen again, and now my car AND laptop are running on empty!

  122. Giving up on Electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would Benjamin Franklin say? You mean he stood out in the rain with that kite, and almost got himself killed by lightning so we could have electrical powered stuff? All thats left is his picture on the $100.00 bill. I say, giving up on electrical powered stuff is a bad idea. No? Well, just try and crank your gasoline-powered lawnmower this weekend, and come back here with a fresh load of cusswords and tell me you really want your laptop powered by anything that besmacks of "fuel". Now, Solar-Powered laptops, that's the way to go!

  123. Obligatory quotes again by TheAvatar666 · · Score: 1

    1) Make a PORTABLE BEOWULF CLUSTER OF THESE! 2) ???? 3) PROFIT! And always remember. In Soviet Union, THEY make mobile clusters of YOU!

  124. This is probably a bad idea, but... by voidref · · Score: 1
    Here is a pic I took of the laptop at CeBIT De.

    That lump to the right and behind it it the reformer, it spans the entire length of the laptop behind it. Fuel Cell Laptop

    Alan

    1. Re:This is probably a bad idea, but... by voidref · · Score: 1

      BTW the image is in the GWIC format, so you will need somethign that can display that before trying to download.

  125. Re:Does nobody notice that we are walking in-place by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Bet you weren't watching dvd movies or divx off your 486 notebook.

    Entirely besides the point.

    more disk access, bigger LCD screens, etc.

    First off, that's a negative on the LCD screen... My old 486 had an LCD screen almost as big as my current notebook.

    As for disk access, processor, and other improving technology, it's completely besides the point here.

    I don't think battery technology has improved much over the years, at least not at the rate that other components have improved.

    Okay, battery technology doesn't move at Moore's Law speeds, but so what? Technology should be getting more effecient, as batteries improve... It seems like notebook makers are intentionally trying to use the components that maintain the same battery life. If they wanted to have the battery last 6 hours they could, at the expense of a _slightly_ faster processor, hard disc, etc., OR they could increase the size of batteries a bit. It just seems that somebody is going to great lengths to preserve the exact status quo... Obviously it's not some evil conspiracy, which is why I posed the question... I'm not sure why every single notebook manufacturer is going for almost the exact same battery life, but I'd really like to know why that is.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  126. Re:Does nobody notice that we are walking in-place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's actually pretty simple. They have vast teams of market researchers determining what 'everyone' wants. Or rather determining what single product or smallest possible group of products will generate the most revenue.

    They have figured out that three hours is about the minimum for acceptable use from a laptop battery. Any less and people complain too much.

    Of course battery time isn't the major selling point for laptops (at least of the ads are any indication). They are always touting the weight and the 'thinness' of the laptop. Remember the commercial that has the woman pulling out a sheet of paper folding it in half and setting the laptop on it?

    They aren't selling to geeks, they are selling to people who don't really like computers, and don't mind vastly reduced usability for not having as much weight to carry.

    Think about it. Three hours, maybe a little more is about the amount of time it takes to cross the U.S. in an airplane, if you take into account that you aren't allowed to use your laptop for some of it.

    So what manufacturers do is design the battery to be as small as possible and still have a three hour life. Everything else is likewise designed to use that battery up in three hours.

    How often have you seen the debate here about laptop functionality vs size and weight.

    I for one would like a laptop with at least an 8 hour battery life, with modular, removable devices for cdrom, floppy, zip, and at least one extra battery slot. As well as being able to sacrifice any one or all of the above for more batteries, or sacrifice the extra battery for a second drive (dvd or burner). It would be much heavier, and much thicker. For myself I wouldn't mind the extra weight, but a lot of people would.

    My place of employment just got some new laptops. have a single battery compartment, no using two batteries. They have a single modular compartment, for using either floppy or cdrom, but if you need both your screwed. If you need more than three hours, you're screwed.

    The laptops they replaced were a little better. You could have cdrom XOR floppy XOR an extra battery.

    The oldest are the best of the lot. They have a built in CDROM (unfourtnatly not removable), and two bays. One for a battery, and the other for either a floppy, or an extra battery. Even they are far from ideal for my purposes, but I liked them best.

    But as I said the trend is toward smaller machines. The newest laptops are less than half the thickness of the oldest ones, and about a quarter the weight.

    But to answer your original question as to why? It's because that's what market research people say will maximize their profits. Yes many others want more stuff in a laptop at the cost of weight, but the researchers say that focusing on smaller, lighter laptops will bring in more revenue than heavier bulkier ones. There isn't enough market for what geeks often want to make it worth their while.

  127. I love it by v2 · · Score: 1

    Great! Now I will have a use for all that bootlegged , smuggled, cheap booze from russia which burns with a green flame!

  128. laptop refill by kipple · · Score: 1

    excuse me but I missed something.. once the fuel cell is over do we have to change it? or recharging it will do the job?
    also, how often will you have to change the fuel cell for a new one?

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  129. Here are some pics. by pario · · Score: 1

    This is just a mockup, but this one actually works. According to this article (in Japanese), the latter weighs 2kg and runs for 5 hours on 300ml of 10% methanol.

  130. Great... by murat · · Score: 1

    ... They had cars with batteries and now they have computers operating with fuel.. There's something peculiar with those Japanese guys.

  131. Drinking Perfume by Bombula · · Score: 1
    Everone has heard the stories of moonshine making someone go blind. I currently live in a country where alcohol is very expensive and laborers drink specially imported 'perfume' instead of Guinness. Sadly, it accounts for many methanol poisoning cases.

    The worst I've heard of though was about a truck carrying perfume crashing in India several years back and 200+ people dying from drinking the loot they made off with. I guess it was the scented kind of perfume, and not the potable kind...

    --
    A-Bomb
  132. Vroom! by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

    Sweet! Now all it needs is a FAT EXHAUST!!

    --
    "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  133. fart power?? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    At last! The very thing I dreamed about in high school! A fart powered computer!!

    Wow! The only thing that scares me is, how do you "gas" it up?? (please, no goatse.cx references!)

  134. the heat evaporates it & cools the cell by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    maybe

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  135. Finally! by pmasters · · Score: 1

    Now I can have a windoze machine that will actually crash and burn!

  136. wow by underwmj · · Score: 1

    one word...KAAABOOOM

    --
    --"Life's a virgin, a bitch is too easy"--
  137. Hmmmm by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

    I guess now my nickname here on Slashdot actually means something. :P

    --
    Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
  138. And that's because by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    of your own body's enzymes.

    Your body uses roughly the same metabolic process to metabolize alcohols, whether ethanol, methanol, or isopropanol. They are turned into various metabolic by-products, that are either metabolized further, or are toxic.

    Methanol becomes formic acid.

    Isopropanol becomes formaldehyde

    Ethanol becomes acetylaldehyde (and is further metabolized).

    The first two alcohols have metabolic byproducts are quite poisonous (as you might well guess... formic acid is used by some ant species to deter predators... formaldehyde is bad for obvious reasons).

    If you drink the methanol from your laptop, your body will convert it to formic acid. Formic acid is directly toxic to the optic nerve, and you will go blind.... hence the term "blind drunk" from people drinking wood alcohol from homemade stills.

    Note that methanol poisoning is far from the only problem with homemade stills... people that distill their own booze often do it with field-expedient materials (rather than proper glassware)... like using automotive radiators as condensors, or brewing their corn mash in big iron tubs. The former method creates problems because the soldered joints in the radiator cause heavy metal poisoning (lead, mercury) due to the metal leaching into the distillate. The latter method produces iron toxicity (used to be common in South Africa, where the product was referred to as "Kaffir Beer.")

    A little chemistry can be a dangerous thing if you don't know what you're doing.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  139. Not on airplanes? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Can you carry flamable liquids on airlines? That's often where you need to longest battery life.

  140. Ethanol? by n-baxley · · Score: 1

    I don't know anything about this, but would ethanol made from corn be an alternative to methanol for fuel cells?

  141. simplest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    water:
    H - OH
    methanol:
    H - CH2 - OH
    ethanol:
    H - CH2 - CH2 - OH

  142. Let 'em try! by siskbc · · Score: 1
    n other words, make the fuel cell hardware cheap and affordable and price-fix the actual fuel refill components as high as possible to maximize profits.

    Allright, I'll distill my own. Bring it on! ;)

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  143. Recycling Batteries by theora55 · · Score: 1

    There's an industry initiative to recycle batteries from laptops, phones and other consumer products. This does not apply to Alkaline batteries, so you'll have to keep discarding those AAs. Spent NiCAD and LiON batteries can be recycled at Home Depot, Target, Radio Shack, Best Buy, Sears or Wal-mart or for more information click here.

  144. Where will all the water go? by haraldm · · Score: 1
    The catalyzed reaction will produce water and CO2 - while the CO2 can simply be exhausted, what does the laptop do with the remaining water? The sum formula is:

    2 CH3-OH + 3 O2 -> 2 CO2 + 4 H2O

    i.e. 2 mols (64 grams) Methanol will produce 4 mols (72 grams) of water. Where does the water go? (And when will /. allow <sup></sup> tags?)

    Does anyone know what the energy balance is from that reaction? There are some slides here but my chem classes were too long ago. In other words - considering the actual efficiency of these fuel cells, how much water will be produced for, say, an energy of 50 Wh, which is kinda typical for a modern LiIon battery?

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
    1. Re:Where will all the water go? by pjotrb123 · · Score: 1

      will produce 4 mols (72 grams) of water. Where does the water go?

      1. Give away water producing laptop for free
      2. Notice water is hot
      3. Sell instant coffee in large quantities
      4. $$$ Profit!!!

      Wasn't step 3 always missing in all plans? Well here it is!

      --
      I liked my next sig a lot better
  145. 21?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In civilized countries the legal age for
    alcohol is 18, not 21.

    TA

    1. Re:21?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm just going to go around calling other countries "uncivilized".

  146. Minty Fresh by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    I am the only one who read "menthol battery"? :)

  147. Not allowed? When they have booze on board? by SysKoll · · Score: 1
    Awww, c'mon, that would be dumb, even coming from the FAA. Look, the average Business Class galley of a 747 already stores enough booze to refuel the plane twice over.

    Do you know how many vodkas per hour a sexy female attendant must pour into an obnoxious Business Class male passenger to keep him from groping her, these days? Multiply by a whole planeload. There, that's quite a lot of booze, eh?

    So you can see that the teeny little alcohol cartridge of the obnoxious passenger's laptop is an infinitesimal addition. Why, by the time the plane lands, the breath of the guy is an explosion hazard by itself.

    Then again, your argument, dumb as it is, might actually be considered. The Transportation Safety Authority has shown a preference for hiring people rejected as unsuitable by the fast-food retail industry, and God knows what these idiots will invent to keep us "safe".

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  148. Not necessarily true by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    "...but also plans to make a PC within two years that can run continuously for as long as 40 hours."

    Unless, of course, its running Windows ;)

  149. First Thoughts....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a5cii think methanol was methane so.....

    http://www.apps23.dsl.pipex.com/Methane-ol.JPG

    Am I an artist? or am I an Artisté

  150. Re:Does nobody notice that we are walking in-place by shaggie · · Score: 1
    As for disk access, processor, and other improving technology, it's completely besides the point here

    I beg to differ here. The faster a HD has to spin, the more power it eats up, the brighter an LCD screen is the more power it eats up and the newer screens are definitely much brighter than the older ones.

    And since battery technology hasn't really improved much, its all about how much power can be stored in the battery. Notebooks are also getting smaller which means sometimes the battery packed into it is smaller which means less space to store the chemicals required to hold the stored energy or some shit like that. (not an expert on battery, electricity storage, and chemical based energy generation)

    I'm not sure why every single notebook manufacturer is going for almost the exact same battery life, but I'd really like to know why that is.

    Maybe because there are only about 10 factories/companies in the world that are capable of manufacturing these machines. Many of the big names like IBM, Apple, Dell outsource the production of these machines to companies like Flextronics, Quanta, Acer.

    The components used in the production for all the different companies are mainly the same and made by pretty much the same bunch of people.

    You know the scene in Armageddon where they were trying to escape and the shuttle wouldn't power up and the comsonaut said.

    American components, Russian components, all made in Taiwan.

    And I do agree with you, would be nice if vendors would put a bigger battery at the expense of some other component to significantly increase the battery life and hopefully not increase the weight significantly

  151. Methanol powered laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't boarding a plane with a laptop already a hassle? good luck getting this onboard!!!

  152. Re:Does nobody notice that we are walking in-place by evilviper · · Score: 1
    The faster a HD has to spin, the more power it eats up, the brighter an LCD screen is the more power it eats up and the newer screens are definitely much brighter than the older ones.

    It's still besides the point, simply because OEMs aren't forced to put the fastest hard drive, brightest LCD (I hate bright screens, I want mine with far less contrast but it's not very adjustable), the fastest processors, in their systems. My who question was what OEMs do that. They could just stay a version or two back, and the battery life would increase dramatically... The fact bleeding-edge technology uses up more power is ENTIRELY besides the point.

    Another thing I said is that devices should be becomming more effecient, not less.

    HARD DRIVES: With the technology of today, you can easily have a spidle speed of a decade ago, but with the data densities of today, that would seem quite quite fast, but not be rotating any faster. In addition to the same rotation speeds, motors have gotten more effecient, chips have gotten more effecient, etc.

    LCDs: Brighter doesn't mean more power. Newer lighting technology has come that wasn't around long ago. LEDs are brighter than ever, yet using up less energy. Other lighting technology like flouresent has become much better, while being lower power, and lower heat than incandesent.

    PROCESSORS: As manufacturing gets better, the paths get smaller, the voltage drops, etc. Newer chips doesn't mean more heat. More heat is an indication that chip manufacturers are pushing the chips faster than the manufacturing process, rather than keeping the heat down, and not pushing out the MHz quite so fast.

    And since battery technology hasn't really improved much, its all about how much power can be stored in the battery.

    That's blatantly wrong. Battery technology has improved SIGNIFICANTLY. I said that batteries haven't improved at Moore's Law speeds, but still, they have vastly improved.

    Notebooks are also getting smaller

    That's just not true. The notebooks now are FAR FAR larger than anything seen a few years ago. Even my "little" 4lbs 1.2GHz Notebook I have now is more than twice as heavy as my 486 notebook, and a bit larger as well (despite the fact that this is just about the smallest one I could find today).
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant