Slashdot Mirror


CD Duplicator Refuses Linux Job, Citing MS Contract

Jonathon writes "Seems a Microsoft imposed restraint of trade agreement and concerns about the SCO suit have prevented a New Zealand company duplicating 500 CDs for our upcoming installfest. The installfest was mentioned on /. just days ago."

491 comments

  1. The Installfest by Zaffle · · Score: 5, Informative
    The actual installfest site is here.

    As one of the helpers for the installfest, I can say that this is pretty much only going to help our cause. We couldn't ask for better advertising (both the NZ Herald, and Slashdot).

    We will be ready, Saturday, with plenty of CDs (we hope).

    --

    I use to have a funny sig, but slash cut it off, and I forgot what the punchline was.
    1. Re:The Installfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA, you think slashdotting the site is helpful!?!?

      Okay, the site *is* light-weight and can probably handle a mild one. But it always cracks me up when people are all, 'we could use the advertizing' and their site blows up into a thousand little pieces.

    2. Re:The Installfest by wishes · · Score: 1

      http://installfest.linux.net.nz

      --
      /sig
    3. Re:The Installfest by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

      As one of the helpers for the installfest, I can say that this is pretty much only going to help our cause. We couldn't ask for better advertising (both the NZ Herald, and Slashdot).

      I'm sure the Society told these guys, "if you turn us down, we'll become more powerful than you can possibly imagine..."

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:The Installfest by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How much does it cost to ship 50 freshly burned Knoppix CDs to NZ by Saturday? Can you give me an address so I can price shipping?

    5. Re:The Installfest by Jarth · · Score: 1

      This is getting to me ... cowering people ... an article over at the register wich is stating Open Source is in for a really exciting trial (read dangerous). And now this, i hope you'll have to go and get another five hundred cd's to make copies or something of that order.

      Just to make the world awake to the powers that are trying to get HOLD OF OUR LIVES while still being merely human.

      So i'm a bit emotional ! All this multi-national more powerfull then the people and their governement kind of news i getting me pretty *ngry just because of the stupid fact these trials are about to happen.

      --
      free dom(inion) - free energy - free your mind - whee!
    6. Re:The Installfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The site loaded fine for me. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass.

    7. Re:The Installfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass.

    8. Re:The Installfest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as we're describing the implosion as "a thousand".. why not "a million kajillion"?

    9. Re:The Installfest by TekPolitik · · Score: 1

      As one of the helpers for the installfest, I can say that this is pretty much only going to help our cause. We couldn't ask for better advertising (both the NZ Herald, and Slashdot).

      If you still have problems, get the duplication done in Australia. An agreement of the nature cited is flat out illegal here, so you shouldn't encounter the same problem.

  2. Re:weird.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    52x writers are under $50USD and a 500 pack of cd-rs is probably well under $100, im sure they can get some volunteers to sit and burn all the discs needed.

  3. Not so surprising by McAddress · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bill Gates did not become the world's most successful business by being dumb. He is doing a very good job using the whole SCO issue to take away people's confidence in Linux. He has done a nice job putting pressure on the CD copying company. He is hoping to make the name "Linux" synonymous with phrases like "infringing copyrights" and "illegal".
    He is not stupid, and if Linux does not watch its back, the penguin might get slain, leaving the world without a reliable and secure OS.

    1. Re:Not so surprising by HillBilly · · Score: 4, Informative

      It wouldn't be worth the risk of a big MS contract over 500 cd's anyway, to any cd copying company.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    2. Re:Not so surprising by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I don't think it'll go down like that. I mean, sure, Software Images didn't get the contract for 500 CDs, but someone else (like Stebbing Recording Ltd?) did and they probably made a buck out of it. I think it is Bill that needs to watch his back, lest the a flock of hungry penguins eat all the herring while he's busy throwing FUD into the media.

      Silly little companies like SI need to go out of business. It sounds like they're being MS-NZ's little bitch, and while that's good for the moment (if you like biting the pillow, that is), I don't expect they'll get any OSS business in the future. Is that a big thing? Yes, because that's the direction the market is moving and they've just blown themselves out of that game.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      leaving the world without a reliable and secure OS

      Uh. It's not as if *BSD is dying or something. ;)

    4. Re:Not so surprising by Narcissus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Leaving the world without a reliable and secure OS? I think some of the BSD coders would have something to say about that...

    5. Re:Not so surprising by quigonn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SCO is about to attack BSD, too. Although all SCO claims are totally ungrounded, they know how to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    6. Re:Not so surprising by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but the very fact that they believe they'd lose that contract for being "disloyal" says a lot about how Microsoft treat their suppliers.

    7. Re:Not so surprising by jkrise · · Score: 3, Funny

      "says a lot about how Microsoft treat their suppliers."

      And OTOH, they reward their loyal clients with Palladium, LookOut, spam, Subscription (dis)Advantage, BSA audits etc. Being an MS loyalist is tricky business!!

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    8. Re:Not so surprising by stephenbooth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds rather like being a commissar under Stalin. Everything's all fine and dandy until one day the secret police are knocking your door down and dragging you off to a re-education camp in Siberia.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    9. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
      My Dear Friend IBM,

      I am highly compelled upon strict recommendation, to write you this very
      urgent and confidential letter.I do hope my letter will not embarrass you
      since I had no previous correspondence with you.I hope this mail will not
      come to you as a surprise.I am sending this proposal with due sense of
      humanity, responsibility and with few awareness that you will give it a
      sympathetic attention. I regret to the inconvenience it may cause you base on
      the condition that we have not met before.

      I wish to use this opportunity to introduce myself to you, I am Mr. Darl
      McBride,the CEO of the former proprietor of Unixware in my home city of
      Lindon, Utah, My Vice President Christopher Sontag had a synflood shot by the
      GNU rebels on his way travelling to White Plains, a city after New York, your
      headquarters along with my daughter, My daughter died on the spot while the
      HP-UX team rescued my Vice President, he was taken to hospital for medical
      treatment which he later died about three months now.

      Fortunately, My Company has Ten million and Five hundred thousand United
      States Dollars(US$10.5 million) cash, which he intended to use for investment
      purposes overseas. This money is kept with private security company in Europe
      since two years ago. It is only my son and myself that know where the money
      is kept and has the documents for it.

      Due to the current situation in the market concerning GNU's vendettas towards
      my family, we seek your assistance to transfer the ownership of this fund to
      you so that you can asisst us to claim it and used for the purpose of
      investment as intended by my Vice President.

      My family is currently being probed by this present GNU for alleged
      involvement in misappropriation of GPL code during his regime.

      Towards this effect, an embargo restricting my family members from traveling
      or carrying out financial transactions without their express permission is in
      force. Right now, my son and myself have concluded plans and decided to take
      immediate claim of this fund so that we can use it to better our lives and
      alliviate our present suffering hence this contact.

      However, I have an arrangement on how you can help us to recieve this money
      after receiving some assurances from you. The money personally belongs to my
      Vice President and he intended that it still be used for investment. No
      record ever existed concerning this money, neither is the money traceable by
      the GNU rebels because there is no documentation concerning the funds in the
      SEC reports. Bearing in mind that your assistance is needed to transfer this
      fund, we propose a commission of 20% (Twenty Percent) of the total sum to you
      for the expected services and assistance. While 5% is mapped out for
      miscellaneous expenses.

      On your positive consent, I shall expect you to contact me urgently to enable
      us discuss about this.Your urgent response is highly needed. I must use this
      opportunity to implore you to exercise utmost indulgence to keep this matter
      extraordinarily confidential, while I await your prompt response.

      Best regards,

      MR. DARL MCBRIDE, SCO LINDON UTAH

    10. Re:Not so surprising by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Gates did not become the world's most successful business by being dumb.

      If he's so smart, then why can't he make a profit on anything besides his illegal monopolies?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    11. Re:Not so surprising by tuzzer · · Score: 1

      SCO is about to attack BSD, too.

      Umm, where did you read that? I'd just like to read it myself...

      --

      bash$ less COPYING
      bash$ more CREDITS
    12. Re:Not so surprising by confused+one · · Score: 1

      He does make a profit... Off of his defense contractor investments -- Yes, some of our weapons are built by companies in which Bill's invested money...

    13. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He makes a profit on sales of Halo for the XBox. There, I have cited an individual example thus disproving your statement that he cannot make a profit on anything besides his illegal monopolies. Thus, you are a douchebag. And remember that even if the XBox division is losing money for Microsoft, Microsoft is making profit off of sales of Halo. You're these guys, you will never, ever touch a vagina you fucking faggot. Stop being so gay about everything.

    14. Re:Not so surprising by miu · · Score: 1
      SCO is about to attack BSD, too.

      I've been wondering about this. SCO is wandering around muttering "gonna sue you so bad" about lots of people - including MS and BSD. AT&T is probably the only company that could have won a lawsuit against Berkeley or BSDI or Windriver, and they got their head handed to them. SCO has to realize that their claims are much weaker than AT&T's.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    15. Re:Not so surprising by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Let's rephrase this: Why should Bill Gates bother with other approaches, when his monopolistic approach has made him so rich?

      Let's face it, "The Market" richly rewards such behavior. Millions of people constantly complain about how awful Microsoft software is, but
      they keep buying it. It doesn't take a lot of brains to figure out where the money is in this game.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    16. Re:Not so surprising by zsau · · Score: 1

      The Devil doesn't die---and it's already been tried by fire.

      --
      Look out!
    17. Re:Not so surprising by Larsing · · Score: 1

      If he's so smart, then why can't he make a profit on anything besides his illegal monopolies?

      Because it's much easier! That's why it's illegal.
      Unfortunately, he's smart enough to get away with it...

      --
      Ethics is what you say you do. Morals is what you actually do.
    18. Re:Not so surprising by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      Thank God, IBM didn't just buy them out, because then He would say "See, there was something up, look at what happened"

    19. Re:Not so surprising by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      >>He is hoping to make the name "Linux" synonymous with phrases like "infringing copyrights" and "illegal".

      Not surprisingly, scox's ceo darl mcbride, constantly compares linux to napster. Darl compares anybody who uses linux to the copyright music theives. Paying royalties to mcbride for linux, is just like closing napster - according to mcbride.

    20. Re:Not so surprising by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      >>Uh. It's not as if *BSD is dying or something

      scox claims ownership to *BSD, just the same as linux. according to scox, both works are derived from unix, and scox owns unix. therefore, according to scox, linux and bsd users owe royalties to scox.

    21. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Linux, *BSD has a piece of paper proving they don't owe SCO a damn thing.

    22. Re:Not so surprising by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

      Then penquinistas shift strategy:
      Linux: So good they pretent it's illegal.

      -b

    23. Re:Not so surprising by Jester99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If he's so smart, then why can't he make a profit on anything besides his illegal monopolies?

      This is +5 insightful??!

      Microsoft started in a college dorm room. Within twenty-five years, Bill Gates turned it into an empire. In the competitive market for software in the 80s and early 90s, Microsoft swept over the competition, thanks largely to Bill Gates's ability to move MS into the right place at the right time, signing the right contracts with the right companies.

      Now, he's reaping the benefits -- they've got $40 billion in cash, a 90%+ marketshare, and, yes, a monopoly. Bill Gates would eat you for breakfast in a "non-monopoly situation." Lord knows, he's done it to enough other companies.

      Now, I'm sure Bill's still got a few tricks up his sleeve. If he were forced to compete in a free market, he'd probably still be doing pretty damn good for Microsoft. But why would he want to exert himself like that, if he can spend less effort maintaining the status quo, where not only does Microsoft make a profit, but they exceed the GDP of several small countries?

      I'm certainly not an MS fanboy, but wisecracks like the parent post's are just ignorant. Monopolies don't come out of thin air -- you get to be the monopoly by being the best at the market (even, or probably especially, if that means being ruthless).

    24. Re:Not so surprising by rifter · · Score: 3, Interesting


      "SCO is about to attack BSD, too."

      Umm, where did you read that? I'd just like to read it myself...

      Linked For Your Pleasure! In this article, Chris Sontag makes the case that essentially every operating system on earth is now SCO property. Somehow Sun is "in the clear,"but Microsoft is not. Key elements of this argument:

      1) The original AT&T contracts deeded all IP derived from Unix back to AT&T

      2) BSD is derived from this codebase as are all sysV implementations. Microsoft and Apple's current OS Offerings owe at least something to BSD.

      3) The BSD case covered pre sysV code, which the SCO released under BSD license a few years ago in any case.

      4) BSD has been contributed to since the case in 1994, and in some cases has received Linux code.

      5) SCO alleges that the BSD folks have not lived up to their end of the 1994 agreement

      It's a scary case, but honestly I don't see how any judge could grant such sweeping power to SCO. It would destroy the IT market utterly and cast a chilling effect on any computer science innovation in the US. This case is going to ultimately end up having to decide many age-old issues which have caused us problems such as people who do not create IP but lay claim to it after buying bits of companies then exercise their rights in a much more egregious manner than the original IP holder would have, and the court-testng of the GPL, among other things.

    25. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, if I had mod points, I would mod you through the roof! But hopefully someone else will.

    26. Re:Not so surprising by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Microsoft started in a college dorm room. Within twenty-five years, Bill Gates turned it into an empire. In the competitive market for software in the 80s and early 90s, Microsoft swept over the competition, thanks largely to Bill Gates's ability to move MS into the right place at the right time, signing the right contracts with the right companies.

      It had more to do with his father being a wealthy and politically well-connected lawyer. That also helped considerably with his speeding tickets.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    27. Re:Not so surprising by cactopus · · Score: 1
      scox claims ownership to *BSD, just the same as linux. according to scox, both works are derived from unix, and scox owns unix. therefore, according to scox, linux and bsd users owe royalties to scox.


      Not really. The USL vs. BSD case blew that one away long ago.
    28. Re:Not so surprising by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      McBride has hinted a couple times that BSD may not be safe. He hasn't made any overt threats yet, tho. IANAL, etc...so I don't know whether or not he could carry thru (it's likely any similarities in SCOunix/BSD were lifted from BSD tho, IMHO)

      "But on Wednesday, McBride wouldn't rule out that the investigation could have implications for Linux companies, Apple Computer, Microsoft, BSD versions of Unix, and other companies using the various operating systems."

      http://news.com.com/2100-1001_3-981569.html

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    29. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leaving the world without a reliable and secure OS.
      Well there is always Solaris and the BSD family (at least until SCO expands their FUD campaign to BSD)
      Linux is hardly the only reliable and secure OS - one of the better *free* ones, true, but the world is not coming to an end without Linux.

    30. Re:Not so surprising by VorpalHamster · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is not the world's most successful business. In fact, Gates isn't even a business.

      --
      If you're telekinetic raise my hand.
    31. Re:Not so surprising by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

      I believe the correct response is "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?"

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    32. Re:Not so surprising by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I had heard that it had to do with his mother helping him get the IBM contract. (This was a slashdot post, so it isn't the most reliable of sources, but nobody contradicted it.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    33. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monopolies don't come out of thin air -- you get to be the monopoly by being the best at the market

      Hey -- go take an economics course. You don't create a monopoly by being the best. You do it
      by illegally cornering the market with dirty tricks and extortion.

      You know, Bill never graduated from that dorm room with a degree? He's just a cheat and a crook.

      Talk about ruthless software: DRM, EULA, Outlook Viruses..

    34. Re:Not so surprising by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But MS has never really competed in a mature free market. Well, there are surely some contempoary examples but I suspect that they are markets where MS is losing money by the bucket load.

      BillG was in the almost unique position of being able to structure the industry around Microsoft, rather than the more conventional case of fitting into an existing market. ie, the market that MS has a monopoly in was largely created by MS itself. Now, undoubtably if MS did not create the market, someone else would have. Overall, I think MS's contribution to the computer industry (the parts that might have turned out different if MS did not exist) are overwhelmingly negative. But, it cannot be denied that MS has had a huge influence on the computer industry, to the extent of essentially dominating most areas.

      I agree that BillG is clearly very good at what he does (good at marketing, thuggery, knifing people in the back, whatever you want to call it). But he was incredibly lucky to be born at exactly the time he was, or he would not have been able to do it.

    35. Re:Not so surprising by dcuny · · Score: 1

      I'm confused... Since this exact same response was posted yesterday, should it be scored as -1, Redundant or +1, Cleverly imitating Spam?

    36. Re:Not so surprising by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Don't be so naieve.

      You know damn well that that won't stop SCO from making a big noise, spreading mucho FUD and suing everyone.

      If you learn one thing from slashdot it should be that you can sue anyone for any reason in the USA and don't even need to have a decent case either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    37. Re:Not so surprising by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I need to finish my OS for when Linux goes down in flames. Then I can be the author of the most popular free OS instead of the least popular.

      Isn't that what open source is all about? Who is most popular?

      Try these OSes on for size:
      Retro Forth
      AtheOS
      VSTa
      TinyOS

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    38. Re:Not so surprising by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      DOS the best in the market?

      Really, what are you smoking?

      DOS became predominant because of it's initial association with IBM. Gates literally leveraged the IBM monopoly until Microsoft was entrenched enough in the market that he could engage in monopoly tactics of his own.

      It's really pathetic when you forget the DRDOS case while discussing SCO v IBM.

      Microsoft after 1981 always had an edge over other players in the market that had ZILCH to do with product quality.

      DOS vs. MacOS
      DOS+Windows vs. OS/2
      NT vs. Unix

      Everything else that Microsoft sells was either stolen or purchased from the small fry that couldn't keep up with the MS warchest funded by abusive OEM distribution contracts dating back to the days when Microsoft made the most user hostile OS on the planet.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    39. Re:Not so surprising by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Too honest for my own good.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    40. Re:Not so surprising by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      'Roberts said "like all good non-compete clauses it isn't [clear cut]. Each situation will have to be evaluated case by case".'

      This is amusing, too. Like a GOOD legal contract, it is UNCLEAR what it says? Um, no... It's unclear so that MS can apply pressure without even needing to spend any effort. The other companies apply the pressure to themselves.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    41. Re:Not so surprising by Arandir · · Score: 1

      leaving the world without a reliable and secure OS.

      Mac OSX, Solaris, IRIX, HPUX, yada, yada, yada. Oh, did you mean to say "free"? Very well then: FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Plan9, Atheos, yada, yada, yada.

      Will SCO gun for those systems next? Probably. But so what? You have to live in the present without wasting time about what's going to happen ten years from now.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    42. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no.

      Microsoft got its megabucks because it happened to be asked to write MS-DOS.

      It *was* a software company before that, but not a major one.

    43. Re:Not so surprising by Arandir · · Score: 1

      You mean if I had a father who could have fixed my speeding tickets, I could have been a billionaire too? My dad actually did help me fix a speeding ticket once by having a private talk with his friend the judge. But I'm still not a billionaire. I'm not a millionaire either. I don't own any businesses. Fat lot of good that ticket fixing did.

      Face it, Bill Gates didn't become a billionaire because his daddy was a lawyer or because his mommy knew somebody at IBM or because he didn't have to pay a $100 speeding ticket as a kid.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    44. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Bill Gates did not become the world's most successful business by being dumb.

      And I always thought it was called MicroSoft...

      -AT&F2

    45. Re:Not so surprising by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Face it, Bill Gates didn't become a billionaire because his daddy was a lawyer or because his mommy knew somebody at IBM or because he didn't have to pay a $100 speeding ticket as a kid.

      Correct. He became a billionaire by establishing and maintaining an illegal monopoly.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    46. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He is not stupid, and if Linux does not watch its back, the penguin might get slain, leaving the world without a reliable and secure OS.

      Oh yeah, because Linux is the only reliable and secure OS available.

    47. Re:Not so surprising by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Wrong! Bill Gates didn't wake up one morning and decide to set up a monopoly by the afternoon. If that's all it takes I could do it too. On Monday I establish a monopoly, on Tuesday I maintain it illegally, on Wednesday I bank my billions, and on Thursday I apologize to everyone and then retire to Tahiti. I guess your problem is that Bill didn't retire on Thursday, so that you didn't get your turn at the billions on Friday.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    48. Re:Not so surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now, he's reaping the benefits -- they've got $40 billion in cash, a 90%+ marketshare,"

      NO NO NO!!! Why do people keep saying this. MSFT has ONLY $1 billion in cash. Moreover, they $40B they list as short-term-investments stock in MSFT that they purchased. (I don't understand how that is possible but that's all I could tell from the SEC fillings last year; maybe someone can illuminate.) This means that if investers get cold feet that $40B vaporizes.

      Everyone is completely underestimating MSFT's ability to collapse. All that has to happen is the people to loose trust in thier ability to make a profit.

      There are many things going against them. They have been increasing the amount of future revenue counted as current income on the books. They also have had to start paying dividents on thier 12 billion shares because they aren't growing like they used too: a decent dividend could mean $12B/year. (Doesn't anyone else thing it's insane that they have 12 billion shares?)

      It would be good if someone/slashdot ran a story about the true financial picture. (Including a 10 year list of billg's insider trading. that in itself will make most people sick.) If you think BillG isn't really scared about the future of MSFT, then why has he been selling billions of dollars of stock over the last 3 years. That's just what the CEO of Enron did while he stood around and told everyone in Enron not to worry.

      3 year balance sheet:
      http://biz.yahoo.com/fin/l/m/msft_ab.html

  4. Act like you have a pair by TitanBL · · Score: 5, Funny

    Later, he said Microsoft's lawyers' advice was: "It's conjecture. It depends on who, what, when, the technology, and a whole bunch of things and the Herald is not a good place to get into a legal discussion." He went on to explain: Have you ever been pussy whipped by your girfriend? Well, if you have, you would understand our relationship with microsoft.

    1. Re:Act like you have a pair by djupedal · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight...

      Microsoft said "You burn those CD's and you're sleeping on the couch!"

      ...is that how this went down...?

      Geek A to Geek B: How's your sex life?
      Geek B: Mine? Fine, um....oh, you mean with other people in the room.

  5. Re:weird.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it's what the k3wl h4x0rs use.

  6. The company's name by McAddress · · Score: 2, Funny

    The name Yesterday Technology certainly describes the company perfectly, choosing Windows over Linux, that is so 1995.

    1. Re:The company's name by calyxa · · Score: 3, Funny

      but from where I sit, it's 5 hours ago tomorrow in NZ. when the programmers there put together a new build for me to test, I get 'software from the future'!

      -calyxa

      --
      Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
    2. Re:The company's name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to choosing Linux which is so 1975.

    3. Re:The company's name by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if they won't let people copy Linux CDs because of MS, send an XP cd and ask for 500 copies...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:The company's name by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What I don't understand is why (and yes I'm going to make an offtopic "Why didn't MY submission make it?" comment) this story is a big deal, when MS just hikacked tens of thousands of computers to be sold by the Thai government with Linux pre-installed by offering Windows to purchasers for 250 Baht (about US$6). There were supposed to be a hundred thousand Linux computers by December, and now there will be, like zero. Check my journal for the details.

    5. Re:The company's name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a translation is in order here? How many people here can read Thai?

    6. Re:The company's name by mjmalone · · Score: 1

      How is this illegal in any way? Microsoft does this all the time. I work at the US Naval Academy and we certainly do not pay full price for ANY microsoft product. Our current license for MS Office was $17 per user and allows each user to install the software on their office and home computers. MS does this all the time, whats the news?

    7. Re:The company's name by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I can, and the infomation that I gave is buried in the middle, so I summarized instead of translating, as I usually do.

  7. Questions about copyrights, or the non-compete? by Obliterous · · Score: 2, Informative

    Either one would be a valid, LEGAL reason for not doing the work, even if it was unhelpful. With the apearant backpeadaling, I'm likely to suspect that someone waffled after hearing about SCO's lawsuit.

  8. It's a private company by panurge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They can sell to whosoever they like. The situation would presumably be different if they had a monopoly (I say presumably because I don't know about New Zealand law) but that can't be said of CD duplication. It's essential that companies do have the right to refuse orders without giving reasons, because every order taken on involves some degree of commercial risk ranging from nonpayment to public liability. Were this not so, it would make for some interesting scams by dishonest buyers. The best protection for buyers is that salesmen as a breed want to be able to sell to anybody with money, and that provides a certain counterweighting to the caution of the legal and finance departments.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not a story because 'some company isn't duplicating Linux CDs,' mind you. It's a story because 'some company is allowing MS monopolistic tactics to compromise various business deals, including, but probably not limited to, the Linux OS.'

      This is more or less what happens with monopolies. They tell people who do good business with them that they can't do business with their competitors.

      Now, I'm not saying that this is right or wrong (monopolies have to do something to stay in business, since they're so big and normal practices stop working), but it's something worth discussing.

    2. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They can sell to whosoever they like.

      Actually; no. There are usually rules (don't know about New Zealand, but a lot of other countries have them), stating that a company can not discriminate people. I.e. they can not choose not to sell their product(s) to a specific segment of the population based on social status or ethnic background.

      I have no idea what kind of laws and regulations you are referring to.

      Then again, YLLMV (Your Local Laws May Vary).

    3. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is more or less what happens with monopolies.
      > They tell people who do good business with them
      > that they can't do business with their
      > competitors.
      >
      Precisely! And that's why the only answer in this case is: Fuck both of them! Use alternatives to Microsoft products and make sure, those alternatives are printed on CD's made by companies *not* encumbered with stifling conditions.

    4. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > a company can not discriminate people
      >
      Regardless of whether this is true or not, why would you *want* to do business with a company like this at this point??? The only sensible approach is to take your business to people with a far more positive impact in the world than those espousing an unnatural software monoculture.

    5. Re:It's a private company by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Depending on the jurisdiction they MAY have the right to refuse business without stating a reason, but that doesn't make it moral.

      Yes a business should have a right to refuse business, but they do have an obligation to give a reason. Otherwise the customer has no way to even know WHY they are being refused, and that pretty much voids all of those laws forbidding some reasons. If it was because they were unsure the LUG had the right to reproduce the material they should say they need proof of their reproduction rights and/or they sign some sort of indemnification document to protect the duplication shop. If it is because of a contractual obligation with Microsoft they should have to SAY so. If exclusive contracts can remain secret all sort of anti-competitive behaviour is possible with no way to ever prove anything.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    6. Re:It's a private company by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Regardless of whether this is true or not, why would you *want* to do business with a company like this at this point???

      Good point. Maybe because the company did not say "no" upfront, but chose to wait long enough with their refusal that they thought their customer no longer had any other options (because the event was too close).

      Didn't work out in this case though, it appears that now the Linuxfest guys are pressing their CDs at Stebbing Recording Studio.

    7. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moral? Why is refusing to copy Linux CDs immoral? Refusing to copy Linux CD's doesn't even enter into the pantheon of the thousand little immoral things we do each day just to get buy. I suggest you re-examine your petty morality and try and find some real priorities.

      And refusing to do business based on a perceived conflict-of-interest is not immoral either. It's good business. Those 500 CDs are a one time thing, but a contract is guaranteed long-term income and one had best not turns one's nose up at being able to provide income for the future.

    8. Re:It's a private company by jkrise · · Score: 0

      " It's not even a story because 'some company is allowing MS monopolistic tactics to compromise various business deals, including, but probably not limited to, the Linux OS.'"

      I think it's a story of spreading SCO-FUD to NewZealand, after getting kicked by LinuxTag in Germany. Since the SCO case is gonna take months before anything further happens, FUD is being spread around at prospective Linux newbies. This monopoly stuff is ir-relevant and im-material.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    9. Re:It's a private company by jkrise · · Score: 0, Redundant

      " It's not even a story because 'some company is allowing MS monopolistic tactics to compromise various business deals, including, but probably not limited to, the Linux OS.'"

      I think it's a story of spreading SCO-FUD to NewZealand, after getting kicked by LinuxTag in Germany. Since the SCO case is gonna take months before anything further happens, FUD is being spread around at prospective Linux newbies. This monopoly stuff is ir-relevant and im-material.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    10. Re:It's a private company by Cliffy03 · · Score: 1

      It is not only how monopolies work, but how many large companies deal with suppliers. Go ask a Tier 1 or 2 auto parts supplier. They get told how much to make, when to make it and how much they will get paid for it. And then are told next year, we want 15% more product at 20% less cost. Deliver or die.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
    11. Re:It's a private company by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't have a thing to do with the specifics of this case or with Linux. If a business is going to refuse to accept my money I expect them to give me a reason. It is a matter of respect if anything else. This case smells too much like "We don't serve your kind here."

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    12. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse is that a foreign owned company (Microsoft) is dictating to New Zealanders what they can and cannot do. That is a load of bullshit, and typical of the style of american corporations.

    13. Re:It's a private company by Monty+Worm · · Score: 1
      The situation would presumably be different if they had a monopoly (I say presumably because I don't know about New Zealand law) but that can't be said of CD duplication.

      Well - I left NZ about two years ago. At this time there were 2 pressing plants in the country - Software Images and Stebbings. For a while Software Images where the only game in town, but they were nice and friendly to do business with.

      For the record, New Zealand law allows for copyrighted goods to be imported by people other than the copyright holders - Parallel Imports are very much legal.

      --
      ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    14. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in other words thanks to Micro$haft half of NZ's pressing capacity is off-limits to Linux...

    15. Re:It's a private company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, New Zealand law allows for copyrighted goods to be imported by people other than the copyright holders - Parallel Imports are very much legal.

      With the exception of DVDs... or at least non-zone 4 DVDs
      The MPAA lobbied hard for that one.

  9. Who cares by hobsonchoice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great publicity for the event, but apart from that, who cares?

    I don't know about NZ, but where I live there (and it ain't silicon valley) there must be a dozen or more businesses in very easy distance which do CD mass duplication. So here's a tip: just ask somebody else.

    1. Re:Who cares by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

      The problem is, in NZ, as far as I know, Software Images is the only game in town. In fact, they're an Australian company, but with a pressing plant in Auckland.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    2. Re:Who cares by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      ...there must be a dozen or more businesses in very easy distance which do CD mass duplication.

      I'm sorry, but there just isn't here in NZ. When we want to burn a CD, it's either them, or we have to pull out a magnifying glass and burn it by hand under the sun. Hell, be barely have power down here you know. And those Aussies don't help matters.

  10. YRO by node+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since this is under YRO, I figured I'd ask: whose rights are being violated here? (I can't see any rights violations)

    This seems more like a story about how evil Microsoft is. And evil they are, which is why I neither purchase nor support their software.

    1. Re:YRO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Since this is under YRO, I figured I'd ask: whose rights are being violated here?
      The topic is Your Rights Online, not Your Rights Being Violated Online.

      The automatic flood of "what does this have to do with my rights?" to all YRO threads is getting just as bad as the flood of "*BSD is Dying" posts to all BSD threads. Give it up.
    2. Re:YRO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the flood of "Your Rights Online" stories are full of whining pussies who wouldn't understand IP and basic law if it jumped up and bit their dick off, but they'll whine about Linux and how Microsoft is keeping them down or something comments? Are those getting tired yet? Well GOOD.

    3. Re:YRO by MrLint · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds kind of like using monopoly power for illegal restraint of trade.

    4. Re:YRO by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "whose rights are being violated here?"

      Gee, I dunno; how about the right of the company to do business with whomever they please? If this were an American company, Microsoft would be nailed to the wall for something like this. Promotional offers loosely tied to non-competes are difficult to push on companies here, and outright non-competes when it comes to selling products are simply not legal. This is why I can walk into a supermarket and purchase either Pepsi or Coke. Neither Pepsi nor Coke can force the supermarket to not carry the other's product.

      If I own a business and a company comes in and tries to tell me who I can and can't do business with, my instinct is to tell them to go to hell. For this company, however, it's totally understandable for them to feel the need to bend over and take it from Microsoft. You can't expect them to toss away a lucrative contract for a small, one-time sale.

      This isn't a story about Microsoft being evil, (although you could infer that they are from the content of the story), so much as it is a story about Microsoft once again abusing its corporate power to squeeze out competitors. It's about Microsoft using tactics which are illegal in some countries, and are such for good reason. It's in YRO because there's no YRG (Your Rights in General).

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    5. Re:YRO by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Sounds kind of like using monopoly power for illegal restraint of trade.

      I'm sure that's what the submitter thought too. While it's true that Microsoft has engaged in both immoral and illegal activities, this is not one of them. Every time MS does something that people don't like, they cry "foul". What possible monopoly can MS have where they could tell a CD copier to exclusively service them? MS doesn't even have a monopoly in OS's (Mac OS X, Linux, etc), office suites, (Open Office), web browsers (Safari, Mozilla, Netscape). Just because your willpower is too weak to stay away from Microsoft, don't blame them. (or if you do keep away from MS, then how can you call them a monopoly?*)

      Anyway, I don't see how MS has the power to force a CD maker to unvoluntarily choose to not do business with others. IBM could do the same, so could Apple, and even RedHat. In this case, MS did it. Sure it shows how they suck, but it doesn't make them a monopoly.

      * Just to save one set of back-and-forths, MS was found by a court to be a monopoly, but pi was legally set to the value of 3 in some southern state too, don't make it so though. If they own 100% of the distribution of something other than their own product, let me know. Apple has a greater monopoly than any MS has.

    6. Re:YRO by MrLint · · Score: 1

      or if you do keep away from MS, then how can you call them a monopoly?*)

      That and your attempt to dodge about pi is irreverent. The court found MS to be an illegal monopoly. If you don't like it. well thats kinda too bad. You can say the sky is pink with yellow dots, but its not.

      Anyway, I don't see how MS has the power to force a CD maker to unvoluntarily choose to not do business with others.

      Because you missed the part where MS says the company signed a non-compete clause. See thats the whole thing with coerced, its an offer you cant refuse.

    7. Re:YRO by node+3 · · Score: 1

      That and your attempt to dodge about pi is irreverent. The court found MS to be an illegal monopoly. If you don't like it. well thats kinda too bad. You can say the sky is pink with yellow dots, but its not.

      The court can call the sky pink with yellow dots, but it's not. If the court's decision is all it takes to convince you of something, then there's not use talking to you. Microsoft is not a monopoly. They were found to be a monopoly by a court, but looking up the definition of the word doesn't match reality. The court's purpose is to find out how the government is going to treat them. Oh, and the court found MS to be in violation of a consent decree, not of being a monopoly (the consent decree was entered into in order to prevent an initial anti-trust lawsuit). Furthermore, what happened to the case in appeal?

      Because you missed the part where MS says the company signed a non-compete clause. See thats the whole thing with coerced, its an offer you cant refuse.

      Uh, yeah. OK, whatever you say. I'm sure the CD copying place could have just said, "Sorry, we don't want to sign a non-compete clause. You'll have to take your business elsewhere." The fact is they entered the contract voluntarily.

      Reply if you wish, I'm done with you if you continue to argue based on feelings and not facts. Just because you don't like MS (neither do I), you really really want your anti-trust, monopoly, coercion allegations to be true, so you ignore the facts. Coercion requires force. MS applied no force (force is a physical thing, simply saying "or I won't do business with you" is not force, even if some people imagine it to be so). Monopoly requires being the sole supplier of some commodity. MS is not the sole supplier of anything except MS software (like Apple is the sole supplier of Apple software, IBM is the sole supplier of IBM software, etc).

      But since you feel that MS is a monopoly, then it must be so, the facts be damned. I pity you.

    8. Re:YRO by MrLint · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Personally I blame parker brothers for your lack of understanding.

  11. Don't you just love non-compete clauses? by speedfreak_5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looks like they can't do anything for any of Microsoft's competitors ... but would linux itself really qualify as a competitor? I know there are many people who package distributions, but what if it was a non-commercial distro such as slackware they were trying to burn?

    And as long as they mentioned SCO, I would love to see them driven into the ground for what they're doing.

    --
    Why yes I am paranoid! Thanks for asking!
    1. Re:Don't you just love non-compete clauses? by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      but would linux itself really qualify as a competitor?

      That's what I've been saying for a long time...

    2. Re:Don't you just love non-compete clauses? by secret_squirrel_99 · · Score: 1

      ... but would linux itself really qualify as a competitor?

      Who cares? You ( and just about every other poster in this thread) are missing the point. Its an insigificant order, for an even more insigificant amount of money. Is it worth even the smallest possibilty of annoying a large (probably their largest) customer over?
      If this were your business would you even consider taking an order that might net you $100.00 at the risk of annoying your best customer? If your answer is yes, I'd suggest that you avoid going into business for yourself.

      The reality is that they made an agreement with MSFT. We'll give you x amount of business and in exchange you don't work for our competitors. It happens every day in every industry and no one questions it. The further reality is that no one at MSFT would give a rat's ass if they printed these CD's . Just the same, for the insanely small amount of money involved, its not worth the aggravation for the vendor. Its not like theres any risk that this will develop into another major client or anything

      --
      If privacy had a tombstone it would read "We did it for your own good" . -- John Twelve Hawks
  12. This could be a good thing... by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now you have ample ammo for suing SCO for libel, slander, defamation, etc...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:This could be a good thing... by Dante_J · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Now you have ample ammo for suing SCO for libel, slander, defamation, etc...

      The trouble is Who will do the suing?

      IBM? Redhat? Knoppix??? certainly not Knoppix.

      Lets face it, even though this is in NZ, it sets a very nasty precedent internationally.

      And although IBM have been playing it cool, as they should, with the rabid SCO flinging mud everywhere the concerning thing is that some of that mud might stick.

      Feature for feature, tech for tech and even on usability grounds Linux is beginning to really become a desktop option with mountains more flexibility than Windows - any flavour of windows.

      MS have played very very dirty in the past, and it would not surprise me in the slightest if it's their intention to do so again, and this case is testing the waters. Anyone remember Stacker?

      However this is a delicate time for Linux in the hearts and minds of the general uninformed masses.

      For the criminally insane at SCO to get some of their allegations to stick is a significant blow in Linux Marketing in the short term.

      It would help significantly if IBM made an big, loud, international, and official statement about the Damage SCO is doing to their market and reputation, and threaten serious legal action.

      A response form IBM like this would strengthen, not damage the reputation of Linux and Open Source software.

      Rusty, Tridge, Martin, have you fellows had smoco with some IBM lawyers recently?
    2. Re:This could be a good thing... by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And an even better case for waiting outside the guy's office with a baseball bat and a ski mask.

      Sure, MS can deny you a future contract, but one linux zealot (and belive me, there are tons) can deny you a working set of knees.

      If you haven't yet, I'd suggest reading up on "Assasination Politics". Basiclly, a group places bets on how someone will die. Once enough bets are placed, the pot grows to be huge. Then one of the betters (that word seems right, but feels wrong) decides to take matters into his own hands and make his bet come true. Very clever stuff.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    3. Re:This could be a good thing... by jkrise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The trouble is Who will do the suing?"

      Huh.. why not some "Association for Open Source in New Zealand", like Linux Tag in Germany? After all, the Duplicator does mention the SCO case as a ground for refusal to honor a contract.

      "Lets face it, even though this is in NZ, it sets a very nasty precedent internationally."

      True, but when LinuxTag successfully asked SCO to shut up, and even got a penalty of 1000s of Marks if SCO spoke rotten things, did that not set an international precedent? In the US, the so called protests ended as a farce. Poland and Australia, I believe, have got restraint orders against SCO as well.

      Let New Zealanders show which side they are on: The SCO-MS FUD GNUterrorists, or against. This is a good opportunity for them.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:This could be a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, the so called protests ended as a farce.

      I also agree, after reading and viewing what went on at the protest, I was almost thinking that these were SCO employees staging something for a PR stunt.

      If any of them were linux users, they need to be barred from ever using linux again.

      Scumbags... the whole lot of them, mostly the idiot hugging McBride...

    5. Re:This could be a good thing... by royalblue_tom · · Score: 1

      Well,

      In the US, it would be the Federal Trade Commission, and in the UK, it would be the Office of Fair Trading. I suspect there is an equivalent office in NZ for complaints of a breach of fair trade regulations" complaint.

    6. Re:This could be a good thing... by achurch · · Score: 1

      The trouble is Who will do the suing?

      Yes, I'd say that's trouble--Who ought to be paying attention to first base.

    7. Re:This could be a good thing... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > ground for refusal to honor a contract.

      This is untrue, although it may be due to a misunderstanding or misstating. The company had NO contract with the Installfest people, therefore they could not be guilty of breach of contract. What they did was basically refuse to SIGN a contract with them, which is their choice as a private company (assuming such laws are similar between U.S. & N.Z.).

    8. Re:This could be a good thing... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yes, I read more than a dozen pages of the writeup on that plan...

      There are several problems with it. First of all, it makes money the sole determination... So those with the most money are the ones who will get their way. Also, it is not necessarily true that the politician that is angering the most people, would be the one doing the worst things... Think back to the issuse of slavery... Lincoln would be the most hated man in the US, but not because he was doing wrong, rather, because he was doing right, yet there's no doubt the price on his head is huge.

      Another HUGE show-stopping problem, is that the theory assumes that money is completely liquid. This is certainly not the case. All it takes is for the government to tell banks to put a hold on the money (and to detain anyone trying to collect it) and the money will not only never change hands, but will provide an easy way for law enforcement to collect the accused...

      I read it, thought about it, but there's just no way it could possibly work. Nothing in the real world is completely anonymous.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  13. Keeping Track of SCO's Victims by Schlemphfer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Is this specific 500-CD deal a big thing? Of course not. But a few people in New Zealand have been measurably inconvenienced by the FUD spread by SCO.

    I think little by little, SCO's efforts to create FUD may inconvenience substantial numbers of people. It wouldn't be a bad idea for a website to be started, for keeping track of the myriad ways that SCO's threats of copyright infringement liability have caused tangible expense and inconvenience.

    It would be a good knowledge base to have, and might come in handy for purposes of a potential class-action suit against SCO, if the company's claims of infringement are found by the courts to be without merit. In any case, this would be one way to give SCO's backers some FUD of their own.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:Keeping Track of SCO's Victims by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      OK, so this is heresy - bear with me...

      I think it might be best to do it on a totally-provably licence compliant Windows system. Arrghhh, I can't believe I said that... Never mind. The idea being that SCO can't get it shut down for copyright or IP violations. Or pick some other OS that's absolutely not related to Unix.

    2. Re:Keeping Track of SCO's Victims by jkrise · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I think little by little, SCO's efforts to create FUD may inconvenience substantial numbers of people."

      Ditto. Other strategies (MS is involved with these, apparently) include Gartner going round the world promoting the SCO FUD. People need to remember that GNU and Linux took a lot of daring, creativity, powerful people etc. If they can't look browbeaters in the eye, they probably don't need the free stuff.

      Rather than keeping track of SCO and MS victims, a better approach, IMO would be to give wide coverage to the views of stalwarts like Linus, RMS, ESR etc. Groups like LinuxTag in Germany and others in Poland and Australia have done great pro-active work and have asked SCO to shut up.

      Since GNU and Linux derive from international efforts, and benefit all nations as well, (unlike SCO-MS which benefit only the US, primarily), the true facts about SCO must be beamed across mainstream media throughout the world.

      In fact, Slashdot could avoid devious SCO interviews, and focus on anti-FUD efforts. HP withdrew it's Linux PC notebook offerings in Thailand, and MS is offering XP and Office for $36!!

      SCO's case is about contract dispute, but many in the media talk about IP violations, as if they knew what that meant. Let's all adopt a healthy Dirtier-than-SCO attitude - let's have a /. article on this topic.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    3. Re:Keeping Track of SCO's Victims by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 1

      I think it might be best to do it on a totally-provably licence compliant Windows system.

      Actually, SCO would have you believe that Solaris is the only safe option.

      --
      Suck figs.
    4. Re:Keeping Track of SCO's Victims by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      In fact, Slashdot could avoid devious SCO interviews, and focus on anti-FUD efforts. HP withdrew it's Linux PC notebook offerings in Thailand, and MS is offering XP and Office for $36!!
      I want to know where you are getting your Thailand info. So far, I have only seen the news in Thai, and would like more details than the newspapers are giving. The price I saw for Windows on the "ICT Computer" (pre-loaded with Linux, originally) is less than 300 Baht, or about US$6. I am in mourning now.

    5. Re:Keeping Track of SCO's Victims by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Agreed. However, Microsoft did at least buy a SCO license "to avoid future problems" with SCO. On the other hand, unless Sun's prospects improve soon, they might find themselves belonging to someone else...

  14. Wuss! by Nucleon500 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The complete and utter spinelessness of every company in existance is getting on my nerves. SCO may be evil, but at least they're doing something. Here we have a company which won't press Knoppix CDs because of either (they won't say which) baseless and and completely unsupported FUD from an insane law firm / software vendor on the other side of the world, or language that may or may not be in a contract they may or may not have with Microsoft, which may or may not be legal. Lawyers have filled every industry with complete, namby-pamby wusses.

    Besides, SCO has claimed that every single modern operating system (except Sun, they are quick to point out), is at similar risk. How could a CD company stay in business if they refused to duplicate anything McBride said was his?

  15. Next /. headline in company's future. by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linux Community Refuses to Give Business to CD Duplicator, Citing Questionable Ethics

  16. Linux's image by Jarlsberg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is further proof that the SCO debacle is hurting the image of Linux in the marketplace and in the eyes of the consumer. SCO may not have a sound case, but they are causing a lot of confusion about the legality of Linux.

    There's also the part of the contract with Microsoft. This company is obviously not going to risc their probably very important economic ties to Microsoft for a mere 500 cd copy job -- no sane business person would -- but yet again we see evidence that the strong arm tactic Microsoft has employed since the DOS days (anyone remember DR DOS?) is still very much a part of their modus operandi.

  17. IP or Microsoft by den_erpel · · Score: 4, Informative

    I do not think that the SCO case made them refuse the job. When I read the article, the SCO case gives them an excuse not to do the CD duplication (of a small number, 500, of CDs).

    They lose almost nothing, while they are sucking up to M$, possibly gaining much more with the obfuscated licensing. I assume M$ will gladly pay their losses, considering the press coverage this thing will get.

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    1. Re:IP or Microsoft by Jarlsberg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I do not think that the SCO case made them refuse the job. When I read the article, the SCO case gives them an excuse not to do the CD duplication.
      Aren't you contradicting yourself? The SCO case haven't been tested yet and until it is, any action they take based upon the case is precautionary. So while the SCO case in itself can't force them to deny the job, they are denying it because there might the problems down the road. I'm guessing that there won't be, but hey, some people are more uncomfortable with the odds than I am.
    2. Re:IP or Microsoft by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      You are probably right - 500 CDs is probably too small of a job, so the company came up with some lame reasons not to do it.

      What's more interesting to me, though, is the lack of comment regarding Oracle's hostile takeover attempt of Peoplesoft, which prompted Peoplesoft to file suit. Note that the US DoJ and a couple of state AGs have become more interested in Oracle's tactics as well, and not a mention on /. Some article about 500 CDs gets mentioned and not Oracle? If you are not familiar with the situation, Ellison told the marketplace that after they do the takeover, Peoplesoft will be shut down. He has backpedaled since then.

      Such is the tech business.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    3. Re:IP or Microsoft by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      If they weren't so tied to Microsoft, they would never have brought up the SCO case at all. The SCO case simply allowed them to avoid stating what their real reasons for refusing the job were. They wanted to refuse the job in a way that made the Linux people look bad and made them not look bad.

      The SCO case is still having an effect, but that effect isn't as strong as people here are making it out to be. It's probably still actionable under libel laws though.

    4. Re:IP or Microsoft by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > some people are more uncomfortable with the odds than I am

      Especially when it could cost them their business and everything they own...

    5. Re:IP or Microsoft by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And it's appropriate that they should be interested.

      I, personally, disapprove, but I don't think of either as an OpenSource company, so I don't have a personal reaction. More of a "this is more evidence of how vile our legal system is". It doesn't make things look any worse than they already did...Or did you perhaps think that Oracle was a good guy. If so, you haven't been paying attention. This is worse than most of what they've done, but it's sure not the only thing.

      Face it, there are more battles going on right now than any one group of people can attend to. So you've got to focus your interests or be spread so widely that you have no effect on anything.
      Thus: I avoid movies and music CDs because I despise the MPAA and the RIAA. But that's not where I'm focused, so I rarely go on letter writing campaigns about them, even though that's a clearly appropriate thing to do, if that's where your interests lie.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  18. slashdot crowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets slashdot them!

    1. Re:slashdot crowed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better do that here. just type in what you think about them and then press submit (a couple of hundred times). This will kill their quotes system for a while == no money earned. Let them feel he effect of enraging (or a mere mention on) slashdot!

  19. When is the Fall of MicroSoft Scheduled anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No empire lasts forever, are the masses at the gates of the castle yet?

    1. Re:When is the Fall of MicroSoft Scheduled anyway? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 5, Funny

      No empire lasts forever, are the masses at the gates of the castle yet?

      No, but the masses have surrounded the castle of Gates!

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  20. Re:In New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the mare might get jealous...

  21. The dumb company in question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:The dumb company in question... by RyatNrrd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey, hey! Here is a feedback form!

  22. Legality of the issue ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't know how the law works in New Zealand, but I know for sure that in France (and probably in other countries where Latin right rules), it is illegal to refuse to sell goods or services without reason. In this case, the SCO thing is clearly insignificant... So I very much think that there could be a quick legal decision that would force this CD press to do the job, would the case arise in France.
    Did anyone check how things work in NZ ?

    1. Re:Legality of the issue ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in your case I would get a Canal+ card over here in Austria, sorry, this kind of behavior is quite common all over europe at least with pay tv stations.

    2. Re:Legality of the issue ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do have a few reasons. Jacks

    3. Re:Legality of the issue ? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure that in most countries. You can discriminate against anyone you like if you have a reason, as long as It's not against sex, race etc. And potential law suits sound like a good enough reason to refuse bussiness to me.

      I don't support what this company is doing, or the SCO case (I feel I need to point this fact out on slashdot), but I think your comment is a bit overrated.

    4. Re:Legality of the issue ? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Dunno about New Zealand, but in this country, it is effectively illegal to refuse to supply someone with goods and/or services if they are a member of a minority group {black, asian, jewish, gay &c. Mathematically, males constitute a minority group, but do not count for the purposes of law.}

      In a disreputable suburb {the sort of place where they send pro-lifers and they come back believing abortion should be freaking compulsory} of the city where I live, some underage white youths went into a shop owned by an Asian gentleman and demanded that he sell them some cigarettes. He quite rightly refused to serve them, and they left in a bad mood. When the youths later returned to the store with petrol, matches and baseball bats, it was eventually treated by the police as being a racially-motivated attack.

      The kids were in the wrong, I do not doubt, but the motive was not racial. They almost certainly would have done the exactly same to a white shopkeeper. The motive was simply that the shopkeeper refused to supply them with fags.

      The point I'm making is if you are a member of a minority group, you often can claim unfair discrimination. There's even a name for this: "Playing the Race Card".

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:Legality of the issue ? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > You can discriminate against anyone you like

      Why would I discriminate against someone I like? I would discriminate against those I don't like, as that makes more sense :).

    6. Re:Legality of the issue ? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Well, You would if you worked at Microsoft, or any other company that sells crap/rip-offs ;)

    7. Re:Legality of the issue ? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Well, You would if you worked at Microsoft

      Then I'm not discriminating against those I like. If I worked at MS, I'd have to hate everyone.

  23. And SCO by zonix · · Score: 3, Informative
    CD duplication company Software Images has refused a request to copy 500 Linux software CDs for a Linux Installfest this Saturday, because of concerns the job would breach a contract with Microsoft and infringe intellectual property rights. [...] When questioned by the Herald on Friday, Software Images chief executive Allan Morton said his company's wariness of Linux was due to legal action between SCO and Linux over intellectual property issues.

    This is of course total BS. If MS does somehow have a hand in this, maybe it's time to get SCO out of the way after all. The longer they stay around, even though their case against IBM is close to vapour, the longer MS can trick these companies into believing the FUD - they probably don't know any better, who can blame them?

    My $0.02.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  24. Let them know how you feel ... by pherris · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the article:
    Software Images general manager David Hill denied there was a non-compete agreement with Microsoft.

    But the existence of a 15-page contract with a non-compete clause was confirmed by Microsoft competitive strategy manager Brett Roberts.

    Feel free to email David at david.hill@softwareimages.com asking him to clarify his statement. There's also a contacts page.
    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh that's smart (NOT)... encourage the lunatic fringe to send the guy offensive emails so that the stories Microsoft told him about Linux users being a bunch of childish fools gains credibility.

      Let's act like grown-ups here and realise that although the company's attitude may be somewhat lacking, they are within their legal right to do what they're doing whether others like it or not.

      Remember, they're not the only supplier in town and if they won't do the job, there will be others who will.

      Mind you, as has been stated, it's rather nice of them to turn an otherwise unnoteworthy transaction into an item of important news. Sure beats paying for advertising and you've got to admire those who use smart (spam-free) marketing tactics!

    2. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Well not only does this company not to seem to know WTF their contracts are, but they may end up with only one customer. If Microsoft has a product in every market, what are they going to be allowed to duplicate? Games? nope MS makes games. Utilities? Does MS sell any separately? Reference material? MS sells the encrata encyclopedia. Office productivity SW is out. OSes are out. Browsers are out. Home finance is out. Data bases, out. how restrictive is it?

      As for the SCO bit, the case is currently not on trial, not in a court in australia, and there is no injunction.

    3. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Unfallen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Let's act like grown-ups here and realise that although the company's attitude may be somewhat lacking, they are within their legal right to do what they're doing whether others like it or not."

      Legally true, but acting like "grown-ups" is clearly more than just letting laws trample all over you, as is becoming more and more evident every day. As an open-source, anarchic "sector", we have no great recourse to legal funding, so we need other channels to influence people to the same extent as those that do. One of these is peer pressure.

      While "lunatic fringe" e-mails to the guy may certainly not help anything, if we can encourage people to send concerned, inquisitive, polite, but most importantly, a lot of e-mails to him, then it starts to become a bit more of a force than a bunch of people whinging about it on a discussion board. ;)

      I'm going to mail him and ask for more details, express my disappointment, et al. The more the better, I say.

      It's not about laws, it's about whoever has the loudest voice.

    4. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Oh that's smart (NOT)... encourage the lunatic fringe to send the guy offensive emails so that the stories Microsoft told him about Linux users being a bunch of childish fools gains credibility.

      Let's act like grown-ups here and realise that although the company's attitude may be somewhat lacking, they are within their legal right to do what they're doing whether others like it or not.

      So essentually you say that this company has the right to be annoying and unfair, but Slashdot users don't?

      Call them, mail them, annoy them. Like the Microsoft-bootlickers would say: "If it's legal, it's OK."

    5. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Arsewiper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I just sent him this - hope it helps:

      Dear Mr Hill
      You are probably receiving a lot of grief generated by a discussion on Slashdot (www.slashdot.org). As you will see if you view the discussion some of the community have taken issue with the news report that you are refusing to support alternative software to Microsoft. That's a pity and it's probably going to bring you a lot of hassle.

      I've had an idea that might resolve this for all parties. If you were to offer copy the disks for free you would not be breaking your MS agreement while supporting the communities of programmers out there and thus creating a more positive image than your company is currently getting.
      Let the group know on Slashdot and hopefully it will bring you peace.
      Just trying to help.
      Good luck with your business.

      Kind regards,

      R.

    6. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we hack their NT 4.0 box hosting the asp files. It's behind update by several years.

      We should make the hacked page rather witty, I believe Saint IGNUcius would be the right Saint to use when posting poetry on our hacked page. Here.. Here.. post the hymn of the free software song on the hacked page!

      Join us now and share the software;
      You'll be free, hackers, you'll be free.
      x2
      Hoarders may get piles of money,
      That is true, hackers, that is true.
      But they cannot help their neighbors;
      That's not good, hackers, that's not good.

      When we have enough free software
      At our call, hackers, at our call,
      We'll throw out those dirty licenses
      Ever more, hackers, ever more.

      Join us now and share the software;
      You'll be free, hackers, you'll be free.
      x2

      But if you really want them to know we mean buisness and we are after all a bunch of terroristes then sing the following instead.

      Rejoins-nous, partage le logiciel;
      Libère-toi, hacker, libère-toi.
      Rejoins-nous, partage le logiciel;
      Libère-toi, hacker, libère-toi.

      Les avares amassent beaucoup d'argent;
      C'est exact, hacker, c'est exact.
      Mais ils n'aident pas leur prochain;
      C'est très mal, hacker, c'est très mal.

      Quand nous aurons assez de programmes
      Libres pour nous, hacker, libres pour nous.
      Ces licenses néfastes, nous les jetterons
      Pour toujours, hacker, pour toujours.

      Rejoins-nous, partage le logiciel;
      Libère-toi, hacker, libère-toi.
      Rejoins-nous, partage le logiciel;
      Libère-toi, hacker, libère-toi.

    7. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Let's act like grown-ups here and realise that although the company's attitude may be somewhat lacking, they are within their legal right to do what they're doing whether others like it or not.

      Yes, but a thousand letters (paper letters not email) telling them that they will no longer be even considered for any duplication services for your company because of this WILL get their attention.

      The owner of that company, and it's a small duplication house compared to the big guys... will sit up and take notice at 1000 paper letter on his desk all telling him that he wont get any sales from XX company because of his actions...

      Paper letters people, email is 100% worthless as a way to communicate anything important .

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by pherris · · Score: 1
      Oh that's smart (NOT)... encourage the lunatic fringe to send the guy offensive emails so that the stories Microsoft told him about Linux users being a bunch of childish fools gains credibility.

      Although I didn't "encourage" the sending of offensive email I should've worded my intentions better. I want people to send well crafted messages giving their informed opinion about how people who work with M$ usually get burnt in the end. Also how a company like his not only could save money by using OSS but could make money off of it (CD duplication).

      I agree that the last thing OSS needs is a bunch of trolls emailing Mr. Hill goatcx links and messages that only contain "U SUX". Hopefully this guy will get more emails like I mentioned.

      Let's act like grown-ups here and realise that although the company's attitude may be somewhat lacking, they are within their legal right to do what they're doing whether others like it or not.

      No one ever mentioned legality here. Assuming there are no antitrust issues then they have the right to refuse the job. We also have rights. We can email him complaining about his company's actions. We can boycott his company and products. We can also tell others of this issue, ask them to responsibly contact the company, complain and boycott.

      I guess what I'm saying is "be nice, tell this company they're wrong and why."

      --
      "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    9. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If you were to offer copy the disks for free

      Yeah, I see that happening -- a business giving away their product for free "just once." But it is a good thing to mention, as it shows them that they are losing business by being strongarmed (whether they realize it or not) by a foreign company.

    10. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1
      Indeed. If pragmatism is the only thing in the world that matters, let it be that if you cooperate with Microsoft, you die as a business.

      Take the guy out. He doesn't have a right to run a business. It's a privilege, and when rendering assistance to Microsoft became more important, that privilege expired. There are LOTS of duplicators more worthy of existence than this.

    11. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Unfallen · · Score: 1
      As a follow up, and in the interests of archival recipts, I received the following e-mail from David Hill in response to my e-mail (politely) asking for further information. He refers repeatedly to the "mostly disgusting" feedback they have received, and while I certainly would like to see them changing their tune with regards to Linux distro copying, I have to agree with him when he says that "This does the Linux community no favours", and whilst I recognise the fact that people are free to post whatever they like to public e-mail addresses, far better results would be achieved through an air of vague professionalism and tolerance in such circumstances.

      Here is the response we gave to the NZ Herald, sorry it is quite long, also thank you for an intelligent response, sadly the level of response from others has not been as professional.

      Regards
      David Hill

      General Manager
      Software Images Ltd
      Us http://www.softwareimages.com

      The Editor
      NZ Herald

      Over recent days our business has been inundated with feedback on a NZ
      Herald article that at best, was less than flattering and at worst vulgar
      and personally threatening. Sadly it reflects an inability to communicate
      the facts clearly and deadline pressures for your journalists to submit an
      article.

      Your article is factually incorrect with respect to the reason we declined
      to replicate Mr McKee's CDs. We wrote to him to "withdraw our quotation and
      offer" citing that "Software Images is unwilling to be dragged into any
      public debate with your organisation or others". Also, it was "a commercial
      decision of Software Images, so that our team can retain focus on our
      business activities not public debates."

      Personally I am unwilling to make a decision on behalf of a client under
      journalistic pressure.

      The feedback that has since been directed to our staff and our business has
      been mostly disgusting and a sad reflection of the improper power of the
      press and the internet. Sadly, rather than altering the decision, it has in
      fact reinforced it.

      A popular IT industry website today notes "... this is pretty much only
      going to help our cause. We couldn't ask for better advertising (both the NZ
      Herald, and Slashdot)." So it seems that the NZ Herald is prepared to
      damage the good reputation of our business to advertise the interests of
      others; rather than accurately report.

      Therefore; I suggest the NZ Herald should print a correction and this
      letter.

      Furthermore there are basically two commercial issue that any reputable
      replicator faces;

      1. Respect for Intellectual Property (IP)
      Software Images places a high value on our clients IP, we have indeed turned
      down work in the past where ownership/copyright/IP, whatever term you want
      to use, is to our knowledge in question. This probably differs from many
      replicators who may just rest on their disclaimer, or just turn a blind eye.
      Software Images will always try to protect and respect others IP as we hope
      people will respect ours. In this case we were still gathering information
      about the SCO v IBM litigation, when being pressured for a story by the
      reporter concerned. However, the fact that we were aware of it, our company
      we will err heavily on the side of caution until we are presented with
      sufficient data to make a decision.

      2. Existing relationships
      Software Images is a Microsoft Certified Partner, and has earned a quality
      relationship with Microsoft NZ. The relationship goes past the point of
      customer/supplier of CDs and packaging. We have developed and implemented
      systems that serve our clients at a strategic level. This involves the
      exchange of creativity, ideas, and of course Intellectual Property. We
      believe there can be a conflict of interest for us to supply the same kind
      of high level services to Eaden. We have a non-compete clause in our service
      level Agreement with Microsoft which we res

    12. Re:Let them know how you feel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but a thousand letters (paper letters not email) telling them that they will no longer be even considered for any duplication services for your company because of this WILL get their attention.

      The owner of that company, and it's a small duplication house compared to the big guys... will sit up and take notice at 1000 paper letter on his desk all telling him that he wont get any sales from XX company because of his actions...


      In general, people who have the need to duplicate enough CDs to affect a duplication company's books in any significant way already have a preferred CD duplication company. Having 1,000 people write to this company stating they will not use their services because of attitude X is the same as having the slashdot community saying to Sun that they will not buy an E15K because of attitude Y: those sales were not there to begin with for them to lose, regardless of their attitude.

  25. Re:ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot he also mentioned SECURE.

  26. Knights of Modern Royalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm reminded of the English tradition of Knighthood. Where some subject becomes a knight and is granted
    dominion over a parcel of land.

    Microsoft granted this company so many parcels of foo, so long as they upheld Microsoft's honor. And on a larger scale, Isn't dominion what was promised to the RIAA, Media Cartels, others, in exchange for their "loyalty"?

    Maybe I stretch things too far. But it seems the power of the common man has dwindled to nothing outside of a small space that's been allotted. Any attempts to reach beyond this space are met with resistance and punishment.

    All these guys wanted to do was duplicate some cd's.
    But that activity appears to be outside the domain Microsoft is willing to grant them. How have we gotten into the situation where we must beg persmission to do mundane tasks like this?

    Is the large scale duplication of information getting to be a little too risque' for the peons? Gotta keep an eye on stuff like that now?

    The box that makes up our collective free will is getting smaller and smaller as each cubic centimeter is parcelled off to the Knights of Modern Royalty.

  27. Now what... by floydman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    every linux supporter is somehow being effected by this SCO/Linux issue. Even YOU as a system admin. or programmer are. I mean i am a linux programmer where i work, and devlopers form the other side(MS dev.) keep on asking, whats up with this SCO thing, so are you planning to go back to Visual c with a wide smile.. . PERIOD..out of subject..

    what i wanted to say is, companies like IBM, SUN, Oracle, Redhat, Suse and others are losing money, credability, business, and are instead gaining lots of headache, questions, bla bla bla...

    Why the fuck dont they just group, put an end to it. They already spent billions in investments on Linux, espically IBM and Oracle(who supported Linux clustering), if they care for their business and investments, they should act, and FAST, before this thing really grows and starts to actually draw back customers who had linux on their considered solution list, knowing that Linux opened new business grounds for them, and they cant deny it, they owe linux exactly s much as linux owed them...

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
    1. Re:Now what... by rhizome · · Score: 1

      every linux supporter is somehow being effected by this SCO/Linux issue.

      You're hysterical. All anybody has to remember is that the SCO junk is only about contracts between IBM and SCO, that's it. No copyright. No patents. Just legalese that doesn't mean anything.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    2. Re:Now what... by floydman · · Score: 1

      Did you ever do business???
      Imagine your self buying a 10 million $ project, you would not pay one single penny unless you are 100% sure that every thing is clear, and figured out, otherwise you have a dozen other things to invest in.

      --
      The lunatic is in my head
  28. His mobile number 021 626 361 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's from the contacts page so I guess he wants people to call him their.

    1. Re:His mobile number 021 626 361 by laemas · · Score: 1

      nice one. I just txt'ed him then. No secretary will be "screening" those. go icq and its free sms to gsm phones (021 is vodafone , to txt try +6421 626 361). oh yeah.

    2. Re:His mobile number 021 626 361 by hdparm · · Score: 1
      to dial from outside nz, ++64 21 626 361

      not that i think somebody will actually do this...however, Pacific/Auckland timezone may be an interesting feature for you guys in US and EU

    3. Re:His mobile number 021 626 361 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hill David B
      32 Gwilliam Pl
      Ponsonby Auckland

      Home phone number : 0-9-376 8366
      Wife name = Sue Haywood.

      Has 14 minor police records and 2 criminal records and 1 DUI + 1 domistic violence [reported but not verified], 1 count of grand larcney and 1 count of fraud with the past 5 years.

    4. Re:His mobile number 021 626 361 by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > to dial from outside nz, ++64 21 626 361

      I don't have a "+" button on my phone.

  29. I need to keep quiet ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Funny

    and not tell my electricity supply company that I use Linux at home, just in case they decide that because some of my neighbours run M$ boxes, that they can't supply me with power any more.

    1. Re:I need to keep quiet ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [rant]
      This reminds me of my ISP - they only support Windows. If there's a cable fault, then to prove it I have to take my Linux firewall down, power off, shove my Windows 98 caddy into the machine, reboot, and go through fscking winipcfg with them until I can convince the idiot behind the helpdesk that it's their fscking problem
      [/rant]

      Point being - give someone a Microsoft course and you teach them to be a parrot. Teach them Linux and they may start thinking independantly.
      Keep quiet ? Yes I love being patronised by idiots who think I said 'My firewall is knackered' when I said 'My firewall is NATted'
      I'll just keep quiet and let parrots take over the world.

    2. Re:I need to keep quiet ... by MadJo · · Score: 1

      *Awk! Polly wants a cracker! Awk!*

      You are absolutely right about giving MS courses will teach people to be a MS Parrot. However, still too many schools only support MS products, sadly. So while we run our (illegal?) Linux boxes, there are people being educated, who haven't seen a prompt in years, if at all...

    3. Re:I need to keep quiet ... by confused+one · · Score: 1
      With you're ISP, insist on talking to tier 2 support. The lower level people are reading a script; and, generally aren't trained enough to actually diagnose a problem, if it falls outside their script...

      I've successfully done this before and it worked. Now, having said this, I have run into two ISP's that just refuse to deal with anything but Windows.

    4. Re:I need to keep quiet ... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Mine, too.

      I recently moved and signed up for cable broadband in my new location. They offer a pretty sweet deal - 3mb/128k $30/mo no install fee - but of course, they don't support linux. No big deal, I told the operator.
      When the install guys were here, one of them had to do some work on an outside line after they had me hooked up and windows running. So I got a cup of coffee for the other guy inside who was monitoring the line and rebooted to Mandrake, showing him how easy it was to set up the network (enter numbers, network restart, no reboot, etc). He was mighty impressed, and had the guy working outside come in and asked me to show him, too. Needless to say I've burned some Mandrake CDs (and Knoppix Live CD) this week for them. :-)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:I need to keep quiet ... by Artifex · · Score: 1

      [rant]
      This reminds me of my ISP - they only support Windows. If there's a cable fault, then to prove it I have to take my Linux firewall down, power off, shove my Windows 98 caddy into the machine, reboot, and go through fscking winipcfg with them until I can convince the idiot behind the helpdesk that it's their fscking problem
      [/rant]


      If you can get DSL at your location, you should be able to go with a provider that supports Linux. I know Speakeasy is one provider for DSL in the US that claims to be "Linux friendly," and there are probably several others both in the US and elsewhere.

      Don't just rant; vote with your feet.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  30. Yeah, but by iamacat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have you really been running it for years, without a crash in the middle? Years of uptime is commonplace for UNIX servers, with many software and even hardware updates without a reboot. Maybe you should rethink what stable means.

    1. Re:Yeah, but by zumbojo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have never had a damaging crash of any kind actually, even when running some rather buggy and/or demanding applications (Blackbaud and IIS come to mind). The key is to install the patches (just like in Linux), make sure you have f*ckin' rock-solid drivers, and dear jesus use a UPS. Try it - even though it costs money to run (oh, boo hoo $200 bucks...) it works with everything.

    2. Re:Yeah, but by eidechse · · Score: 1

      Are those servers utilizing a gui subsystem? How about some form object/component framework (e.g. CORBA, COM)? Are they some tier in an n-tier scenerio?

      Or are we talking about an NNTP, SMTP, <some other fairly simple protocol>? Or perhaps a server dedicated to a single app/purpose that exclusively runs custom code for that purpose?

      Years of uptime on a server class OS isn't that interesting if the server is doing something fairly simple.

    3. Re:Yeah, but by RichiP · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have worked for an ISP that serviced individual as well as corporate clients nationwide and we used a combination of Linux servers and Cisco equipment. The servers were rock-solid, with or without patching, I could (and did) administer any of the devices (router or server) via a dialup, any customization we needed we could because we had the source, never had a problem with lock-in, all the software conformed to standards, and nothing could rival the techsupport given by the community. Try it - even though it costs no moent to run (oh, boo hoo $0 bucks...) it works with everything.

    4. Re:Yeah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but IIS is a "demanding application"? If Apache ever knocked down my OS, I would shit my pants!

  31. i'm sure we'll have a reliable and secure os... by splerdu · · Score: 1

    Laws of a free market economy: some company will be there to fill the demand.

    But it wont come cheap.

    1. Re:i'm sure we'll have a reliable and secure os... by eidechse · · Score: 1

      "Free market" also means free from private interference.

      I don't recall a whole ton of new phone companies popping up to free customers of having to rent their phones Ma Bell.

      How about price fixing?

      If too much power acumulates in a single commercial entity or a small number of commerical entities the "free" market can be influenced. In those situations I don't think it's reasonable to conclude that an entrepreneur is going to suddenly show up and restore balance.

  32. CD mass duplication by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Funny

    The problem can easily be solved by picking up a few of these CD burners. 500 CDs? No problem!

  33. Dude, posting his cell? Thats cold. by pherris · · Score: 1

    As every GNU/Linux fan on the planet is saying "Can you hear me now?" BTW, in case they take down or change their contacts page here is Google's cache.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Dude, posting his cell? Thats cold. by srn_test · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not that bad - it's not like he'll be paying to receive the calls...

    2. Re:Dude, posting his cell? Thats cold. by radja · · Score: 1

      and it has an 'off'-button.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  34. Re:Helping the cause by Jeffna · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... I can say that this is pretty much only going to help our cause

    I'd say so. I downloaded Knoppix last night after the previous installfest story piqued my interest.

    Things to note:

    I've used Micosoft software since I started using PCs.
    I'd never used any version of Linux before.
    I was very impressed with what I saw.

    Congratulations guys, you just gained a brand spanking new Linux user.

  35. yes, but it's very limited by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Informative

    One can usually discriminate however one wants, with the exception of certain sorts of discrimination that are prohibited. You can kick someone out of your restaurant because you think they're an ass and personally dislike them, but you can't kick someone out of your restaurant because they're black and you personally dislike black people. In some countries there are exceptions to this for private clubs (e.g. the Masters can prohibit women, and the Boy Scouts can prohibit atheists and homosexuals).

    But in any case, this case is completely unrelated to that, as it's about restraint of trade and anti-competitive business practices (if it's about anything at all).

    1. Re:yes, but it's very limited by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      the Masters can prohibit women, and the Boy Scouts can prohibit atheists and homosexuals

      What, seriously?

      I mean, I can't stand golf or the boy scouts, so whatever, but is this really true? I'm too surprised to be articulate right now.

    2. Re:yes, but it's very limited by mrscorpio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes it is true.

      Frankly, I am for this - not the prohibition of women (my wife), atheists (myself), and homosexuals (my best friend), mind you, but the right for a private establishment to allow or not allow anyone they choose for any reason.

      Notice I say PRIVATE. The Boy Scouts and The Masters are private organizations, paid for by individuals, not the government, i.e. tax dollars. Everybody pays taxes (well, in theory), so everyone should have access to publically/federally funded organizations. Individuals fund private organizations, so those individuals should then also decide who is eligible for the benefits enjoyed by members of said organizations.

      On a smaller scale, saying that you don't think private organizations should be able to discriminate would be akin to saying that you couldn't keep someone out of your house for a prejudicial reason. What's prejudicial? Shouldn't matter, it's YOUR house and you should have a say in who comes in the door. The same goes on a larger scale. The Masters does not prevent women from playing golf and the Boy Scouts don't prevent atheist from learning how to survive in the woods. Nor does the KKK prevent blacks from being white supremacists (Laugh, it's a joke. And also a Chappelle Show reference). So why not move along to another club that will have you as a member, or start your own, rather than clashing with a group that doesn't want you?

      I know I am putting many words in your mouth in this reply, but I'm always making this point with other people when the topic comes up so I figured I'd translate it to written form for the purpose of slashdot discussion. If the views I'm replying to don't reflect your opinions on the matter, no offense intended.

      Chris

    3. Re:yes, but it's very limited by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      I know I am putting many words in your mouth in this reply,

      Oh, just a bit :-)

      I agree that a private organisation should be able to make, within reason, any rules they like. I'm just staggered that they choose these particular rules.

    4. Re:yes, but it's very limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you can kick the niggers out pretty easily - all you have to do is make it policy that only people who know their daddies are allowed to dine. That'll keep the fucking porch monkeys out. Did you know that 70% of coons in the USA are born out of wedlock? They're animals. They don't respect civilization at all - just eat and fuck - ANIMALS!!! Seriously, they're almost as bad as the fucking ragheads. Those pieces of shit in dirty bedsheets haven't contributed anything to civilization except a thousand years of killing people. The world would be a much better place if everyone was white. I mean, cultural diversity is bad - let's face it. All it does is throw people who don't see the world in the same way together and create strife. As the whites have proven over the years, they are the most intellectual race. LONG LIVE THE WHITE RACE!!!

    5. Re:yes, but it's very limited by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Why? Atheism goes against half of what the Boy Scouts stand for & teach.

      (Don't flame me, I'm Agnostic.)

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:yes, but it's very limited by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Boy Scouts accept a lot of public funding. More details here.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    7. Re:yes, but it's very limited by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "The Boy Scouts and The Masters are private organizations, paid for by individuals, not the government, i.e. tax dollars. "

      But I bet the Boy Scouts are organized as a not-for-profit organization and receive a number of tax deductions as a result of that status.

    8. Re:yes, but it's very limited by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > almost as bad as the fucking ragheads. Those pieces of shit in dirty bedsheets haven't contributed anything to civilization except a thousand years of killing people

      I know this isn't exactly a well-thought-out or possibly even serious statement, but some people truly believe this crap. Until a thousand or two (someone else can provide specifics) years ago, the Arabs/Muslims were pretty much the pinnacle of technology. Many of the greatest inventions, and especially methods (agriculture, chemistry, you name it) came from the Middle East.

    9. Re:yes, but it's very limited by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Funny... when I was a member the religion was strictly formal: We had to assert that we were religious every meeting. Period. Nothing else.

      What the boy scouts was about was 1) how to survive in a physically taxing environment (the woods, the ocean, etc.) 2) how to be a well regimented member of a group of well regimented boys.

      Point 1 was what we enjoyed. Point 2 was only moderately successful. (After making Life scout, I became an anarchist for a few years. But I did know HOW to be a well regimented member of a group.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:yes, but it's very limited by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      So should rainbow push be forced to have KKK members sitting in the front row, what about the NAACP?

      --
    11. Re:yes, but it's very limited by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Umm Look the parent to your reply is a moron, but I will point out Islam is only about 1500 years old. So what we see from this is what an Islamic culture managed to so to a scientifically advanced people.

      --
    12. Re:yes, but it's very limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, until the terrorist "religion" called Islam made them completely useless for everything but causing destruction and violence. Islam is evil.

    13. Re:yes, but it's very limited by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they consider religion one their tenets for some reason. I didn't make the rules up....

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  36. As George Harrison once said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    .

    All good things must pass. I know, I had some great corn last night and there it was again, almost as fresh-looking as going in the other end.

    .

  37. boycotts? by buro9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i'm usually amazed how seldom people will resort to boycotts.

    whilst i would have no doubt that MS are obviously a large part of their business, it is obvious that no business survives with just one good horse in their stable.

    with a good enough word-of-mouth campaign it should be possible to inform local businesses and companies of the boycott, inform them of other options, and thus remove a chunk of their potential business.

    500 cds may not hurt their purse strings, but 100 x 500 will.

    do we forget just how much power we have?

    1. Re:boycotts? by cerberusss · · Score: 1
      500 cds may not hurt their purse strings, but 100 x 500 will.
      Where do you get 100 customers in New Zealand who give a flying fsck about the company not printing Linux CD's?

      I don't want to be negative, but there are just not enough people who care about this to make an impact. OTOH I would certainly refuse to do business with them anymore, if the facts are like we assume here.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:boycotts? by MadJo · · Score: 1

      Instead of a boycott, you can probably reach more, if you can convince the business-owner of his 'mistake' in insight.
      Or would you rather bankrupt an honest, be it a bit naive, company? And make a lot of people jobless?

    3. Re:boycotts? by alienw · · Score: 1

      The reason boycotts are seldom resorted to is because their effectiveness is equal to zero. Businesses won't give a flying fuck if a CD manufacturer refused to press someone's CDs because they weren't sure of the copyright status. It's a perfectly valid reason, anyway, and I don't see why the hell Slashdotters are getting so upset with it. If I run a CD manufacturing company, I have the right to reject any and all job offers, regardless of the reason.

    4. Re:boycotts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should establish an "Ms-whore" list: do not touch even with a long pole

    5. Re:boycotts? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > if the facts are like we assume here

      OMG! Someone that doesn't assume that the truth is what they want it to be. I bow to your openmindedness, thank you.

  38. Slackware by A1miras · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slackware IS a commercial distro and in fact one of the oldest commercial distros.

    However, your point is well taken. Just replace "Slackware" with Debian.

    --
    Take Care

    A1miras
    1. Re:Slackware by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Slackware IS [one of the oldest] commercial distros

      Really? What's the name of the company that first produced it? I've never heard of Slackware Inc. I thought slackware was basically a DIY Linux and not really a distro at all. Does it have certain packages that are all installed by default (other than the kernel)? Does it have an installer?

      I haven't tried touching slackware in a long time because I thought it was basically just a bunch of tar/gzipped files that you had to assemble (not ASM, I mean the action) "by hand."

    2. Re:Slackware by __past__ · · Score: 1
      Really? What's the name of the company that first produced it? I've never heard of Slackware Inc.
      Slackware(R) is a registered trademark of Slackware Linux, Inc.. Right there, at the bottom of the page.

      And since when does having a default set of packages make a distro commercial?

    3. Re:Slackware by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I think you believed the propaganda a little too much.

      A lot of people absolutely insist that Slack does not have "package management" because the package management system Slack uses does not track dependencies. This has lead to others thinking that it doesn't have package management, and when they hear that packages are stored in TGZs, assume that what's meant is that Slack users have to cd /usr/src, untar, ./configure, make install, etc.

      You don't. You have a fairly normal friendly menu-driven frontend for installation, you pick and select packages to install, and subsequently you can install and uninstall others, either from the command line (using installpkg and removepkg) or via the Slackware setup utility. You can download packages from sites like www.linuxpackages.net.

      Slackware does package management. It manages packages. It's just not the greatest implementation, and those who argue that because it's lax in one area, it can't be a package manager, need a good kick in the goolies.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Slackware by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I think you believed the propaganda a little too much.

      I'd like to point out that my questions arise not from propaganda, but from ignorance. I truly did not know the answers. Thank you for explaing that to me though.

      Is that package manager specific to slackware (and/or contain "slack" in its name), or can it be installed & used (despite possible dependency issues) on just about any Linux base?

    5. Re:Slackware by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > an it be installed & used on just about any Linux base?

      Pardon me, I realized, after the fact, what a stupid question that was.

  39. Finally by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And finally the Linux community realizes that the SCO case is to be taken seriously...

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      NOT A TROLL

      I take children with fireams and mosquitoes in tropical, malaria-infested countries seriously.

      The sort of damage that the SCO case can do - regardless of the merits of that case - is something that should be taken seriously.

  40. Slashdot: The END is Nigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot: The END is Nigh

    Or was that the Register? Extinction is a natural course. Relax.

  41. My few cents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a Linux user myself for many years I now see the sideeffects of Open Source myself and started to eye for alternative Operating Systems such as MorphOS (Pegasos), MacOSX, BeOS Zeta and Microsoft Windows. There are various reasons for me to do this.

    a) The Open Source community used to be a nice one, the philosophy of it was valued high in the first couple of years but meanwhile the entire situation has changed. Companies are trying to protect their IP, other companies don't work fair with the Open Source company by not backporting their changes in the original sources and so on.

    b) The audience changed totally, you need to deal with more and more complaining and ranting people every day. People that are always dis-satisfied regardless what you do. Even I as Programmer need to deal with these people. I spent my time writing the programms, fixing bugs, answering technical emails, pay for the Webspace, offer the software and yet you need to deal with dis-satisfied people all overwhere which leads into demotivation of doing something better.

    c) Many people wandered off from Linux and Open Source by using alternative Systems (preferabely MacOSX) thus they have a working, aesthetical, nice, round and standardized desktop environment with all tested tools. They can get their work done and don't care for Linux and it's Open Source that much anymore as they initially did. A lot of people started to work a lot less on Open Source because they don't see the need to do this anymore because they get all the software with better quality offered on their alternative System.

    Here an example: A lot of GNOME developer moved away working on MacOSX these days and don't look back, while they still help with various fixes, coding etc. they still do this as funjob, they don't see the need to work as hard to make a good Desktop because they have a Microsoft independant OS (MacOSX) which offers them everything and more than GNOME for example. Of course they also see the points written by me here with all the ranting people, no fair play of companies and the general demotivation.

    Face it, we all like to be honoured for our work, we all like to hear 'thank you' from the people outside that we spent our time working our ass off on the tools we offer. But the reality is that we deal more with complaining people rather than people who said 'thank you'. We all like to earn some money with what we do. Look, we sit down the entire day, weeks, months working on the Tool, we pay for Webspace and more and we don't even get the money back for the Webspace we pay once per year.

    Open Source is indeed a nice thing but the times has heavily changed, complaining users, demotivation, dirty play with companies, sueing of people who wrote Open Source applications like the freecraft person. A very nice game and now it's not available anymore because he got is ass sued off.

    Think about it, is it really worth the trouble ? We should concentrate back to the old roots and try making some bucks with our work, getting the webspace paid, stop the insanity with open source. it's a good idea but the license is only a hype. Like everyone can fork the code and release his own version of the software which only ends in 20 derivates which each of them still doesn't do the work it was aimed for. Not to mention that we all are individual people who work for fame, for money for being someone in the community. You work on the software because you love it because you never think about someone comming up forking it and then one day you see a derivate of your work floating around in the community and you get heavily pissed off and stop working on it and feel disappointed and have thoughts in your head saying 'what did i do wrong, why did this person fork my software' and so on. Please don't understand me wrong, think back the time when emacs got forked to xemacs. Or think back when KDE Desktop got heavily trashed by RedHat. You are itching at the egos of people with this. It's really better to start thinking about new and better ways and search for an alternative work on an alternative System.

    1. Re:My few cents. by aeoo · · Score: 1

      It is sad to read your comment. I'm not sad because what you say is true. I'm sad for you.

    2. Re:My few cents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free Software exists because we choose to live in a world in which our freedoms are not limited in certain ways. Once we make that decision, all the same old problems of making money, paying the bills, deal with assholes, etc are still there. This is not a another plain of existence, it's just a system for distributing and licensing software.

      All you ego-oriented people, who worked on software for the reputation or bragging rights or something, are a bunch of relunctantly accepted groupies. Your code is as nice as anyone else's, but who wants to be around when your bankaccount finally hits the fan, as with the Linux Router Project guy ?

      Even the most fanatic Raider's fans still pay the rent and keep a job during the week. (Ok maybe not some of those guys.) Even Richard Stallman does a bit on consulting when the money gets low. You "labor of love" fanatics were allways a disaster waiting to happen. Don't hit your ass on the door on the way out.

      You do realize that "normal" Free Software programmers get paid, right ? Sometimes they earn a salary from a company (usually in this case only a portion of their work is Free), sometimes they work as consultants to small businesses setting up networks and etc and assist projects that help them make money (my case), or any of a myriad of situations as varied as the industry was *before* ESR wrote the Cathedral and Bazaar essay which attracted all the fan boys.

  42. If linux geeks were more like Los Angelians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This place would be nothing more than a structure fire. Comeone people. Don't take this crap. Burn the mofo - or at least loot yourself one of those disc pressing machines.

    1. Re:If linux geeks were more like Los Angelians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man I don't know if you're actually from LA or not, but don't screw around. I actually deliver pizzas in south central Los Angeles. Two people have been killed within the past 2 weeks within my delivery area (arlington to S. Central).

  43. Re:ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but they discontinued NT, so unfortunately we would have to use that unstable windows 2000, or the infamous windows XP.

  44. I live in NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't know of any such laws. You wouldn't get away with refusing to serve homosexuals etc.

    I doubt the courts would actually even care about the issue.

  45. Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by marcushnk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After ATI win a MS contract for the next Xbox, they now don't support linux drivers.. whats the bet its the same sort of contract.

    utter bastards.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by entrigant · · Score: 1

      I would just mod you down, but it'd probably more productive to just set you straight. So two points...

      1) When nvidia worked with microsoft for the first xbox they didn't stop supporting linux

      2) ATI hasn't stopped supporting linux.

      Nothing more to see here.. move along.

    2. Re:Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      "After ATI win a MS contract for the next Xbox, they now don't support linux drivers."

      No shit? I heard that ATI was dropping Linux support but, uh, this smells..
      That should be illegal..

    3. Re:Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What are you talking about? ATI supports linux, go to their site and see, the unsupported was there for 6 hours when they were re-doing their site. I thought this matter was resolved. Why is everyone modding the troll above?

      I'm a Radeon 9700 user and I just got an updated driver from their download page. And am playing UT right now using that (which is btw giving me more fps than the xp version).

    4. Re:Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Just the same way Nvidea dropped linux support when they got the same contract..........

    5. Re:Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      When did this happen??
      I've got an nvidia card and Linux.
      I just checked on the drivers update status a few weeks ago and they still had Linux drivers for download. Matter of fact I just now went there and here's what they have.

      From Nivida.com downloads,
      "Linux Graphics Driver Download

      Version: 1.0-4363
      Operating System: Linux IA32
      Release Date: April 24, 2003"

      Are they now *NOT* going to support Linux in future hardware and not release new and improved drivers for existing cards and customers???

      Damn!

    6. Re:Bet its the same trick they used with ATI by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I take it the concept of sarcasm has missed you totally. Have a nice day. (IE what i meant in my post was Nvidea had the same contract and their linux support got stronger during the same period. This has nothing to do with the xbox contract.)

  46. The last thing Linux needs... by 5.11Climber · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is to have a hate email/phone mail campaign against these bozos. It will confirm to Software Images and probably others that they did the right thing in refusing the order.

    --
    Arf!
  47. Microsoft never told them to not to do this! by hng_rval · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the article:

    Roberts said the contract with Software Images did not contain anything that prevented Software Images working with the Open Source Society or pressing Linux CDs "or anything like that".

    He said Software Images made their decision before talking to Microsoft "for their own reasons".

    "It's very much a Coke/Pepsi situation. If you are an ad agency dealing with Pepsi you don't pick up business with Coke."

    When the Herald pointed out that Open Source software was a competitor to Microsoft, Roberts said: "I guess so, but the NZ Open Source Society isn't."

    --
    Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    1. Re:Microsoft never told them to not to do this! by Ernest · · Score: 1

      And yet they didn't do the job.

      Hopefully this will backfire on them, as other businesses requiring a cd duplication will now go somewhere else.

      --
      Ernest J.W. ter Kuile
    2. Re:Microsoft never told them to not to do this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps they didnt want to get involved in the sco mess? they have every right not to, especially for the small benifit of a small 500 cd copy job. whether sco is right or wrong they could cause problems for this small company and they have no oblifation to involve themselves in this.

  48. A list of possible Home Phone Numbers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Give Him a call

    Our country code is 0064

    Enjoy ;)

  49. Re:New Zealand is such a stupid place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He may be a dick, but you can't spell.

    It's:

    "You're a dick."

    See, the "you're" is a contraction. It combines "You" with "are". "Your" is a possessive pronoun.

    Didn't you graduate 3rd grade?

    --
    A.C.
    (Not from Oz but still can't stand stupid grammatical mistakes.)

  50. [OT] A Coke and Pepsi situation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "It's very much a Coke/Pepsi situation. If you are an ad agency dealing with Pepsi you don't pick up business with Coke."

    Um... I work for an ad agency, and our company deals with both of the above mentioned companies. We work around the possible problems by having different teams work with the individual companies. (I think this is semi-public knowledge, but I'm posting AC anyhow, to be on the safe side.)

    That said, the deal with Software Images is just a hiccup, lost business for them. I'm sure there is a long list of other companies that will duplicate for them without any trouble at all. Move on, nothing to see here.

    1. Re:[OT] A Coke and Pepsi situation? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I'm sure there is a long list of other companies that will duplicate for them

      Not in New Zealand, there isn't.

  51. Reliabile Duplication Services by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's right, New Zealand businesses! Software Images has helped you make a decission towards reliable outsourcing for your data duplication needs. If you need an outfit who can be trusted to handle your order, even important rush orders, Software Solutions is not your provider.

    Data duplication is an important last step to any project that requires physical media for distribution. You need to know that your order is accepted and being handled and processed quickly, efficiently, and reliably. At Software Images, your data duplication order may be green-flagged by their expert account managers... only to be refused at a later date.

    Your order may be refused because, on a "case by case basis", the data in question might be considered in competition with Microsoft. And as Microsoft continues to reach in to new sectors and attach new niches... who's to say if one is in direct competition or not? But you'll find out. After your order has been rejected and you are forced to scramble for another outsource provider.

    Your order may also be refused if an industry competitor makes unfounded alligations as to owner of the intellectual property contained in your duplication order. No need to wait for a court ruling. No need for proof of a currently valid license. Your important job will be rejected, leaving your business high and dry.

    In this tough economy, every business needs reliable outsource providers. They need to know that services will be there for that important job or rush order.

    With Software Images, you won't know.

    Software Images. They're not there for you. They're there for their major account - Microsoft.

    1. Re:Reliabile Duplication Services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A couple of hours ago, I independently raised these exact points in a polite email to Software Images as to why my business (inside their geographic area) cannot afford to rely on their service.

    2. Re:Reliabile Duplication Services by sn00ker · · Score: 1
      Software Images. They're not there for you. They're there for their major account - Microsoft.
      Excuse me, this is Slashdot. What the hell do you think you're doing? correctly using their, there and they're - And all in the same sentence.
      You ought to be ashamed of yourself. Next we'll be getting people putting facts in their followup posts.

      --
      "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr, userfriendly
    3. Re:Reliabile Duplication Services by MacrosTheBlack · · Score: 1

      He must've used his non-MS grammar & spelling checker. :P

  52. Why not break into the RIAA storehouse? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    With all those 436x burners that they've had seized, the Linux guys could have 500 cds in the blink of an eye!

    An eye punctured with shards of flying CD, of course. Hillary can oversee the whole operation! But only for a minute...AHHH!

    >;C MY EYES!

  53. Installfest is for the past by justsomebody · · Score: 1

    It would seem it's time to start with CDCopyFest

    --
    Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  54. Better Yet... by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1
    Ask for a 1hr quick quote asking to get 500 Linux CD's duplicated ;-)

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  55. Re:weird.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    quite possibly the second greatest hoax of all time (the first of course being Cmdr fucko's assertion that slashdot is a more advanced system than Kuro5hin & FARK) is that hackers use Linux. This myth is constantly perpetuated by fanboi's attempts to crapflood message boards, IRC, and newsgroups with the assertion "hey, I don't need no steenkn' control panel, I have LOONIX!!!11!" and the associated rubbish.

    The simple truth of the matter, is that Linux is all but uninstallable on anything but a computer. Anyone who claims that they installed Linux on a computer is quite simply lying. This is due to a number of facts, including the legacy support of i386 processors. Newer chipsets, such as the SCO and Macintosh video cards, have workarounds and can achieve a subtle increase in gaydar rankings, but you'll never see Linux running on anything with a reasonable amount of RAM.

    To its credit, however, Linux is quite capable of running a watch, or similar sub-complex hardware. This is because it does its job very well, that is, keeping time. In fact, it will waste cycles maintaining its own clock, discarding the perfectly useful CMOS clock found in most post-1975 computers.

    As a response to the smelly teenager who insists on wearing his favourite t-shirt 5 days a week to your workplace, simply ask him (when he next shouts at you blathering on about freedom of choice) about which VM you should use... the one that crashes all the time, or the really slow one?

  56. Heh by jazman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Software Images' account manager Dean Baker...backtracked, saying there may be an issue due to a "replication agreement" with Microsoft."

    So they're in bed with MS, that's why they don't want to promote Linux. The SCO FUD is just an excuse; they just don't want to upset MS.

    Still, we all know what happens to companies that get in bed with MS. Eventually MS f**ks them.

    1. Re:Heh by CyberDruid · · Score: 1

      I thought I was the only one who played typing of the dead...
      Truly a great game

      --

      Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  57. Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malaysia by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Malaysia being the world's #1 producer of PIRATED CDs, VCDs, and CD-ROMs, has more than enough talent and capacity to make ANY NUMBER of high quality CD, even in a short order.

    The cost of making CDs in Malaysia is EXTRA-ORDINARILY LOW - amount to LESS THAN USD 0.25 per CD, with quantities of 500 or more.

    No, I am NOT a CD pirate. I just know enough people who are in this line of "work" to know the cost.

    Not only the cost is low, the CDs they produce are also of high quality - rejection rate of less than 0.5 %, and turn around time can be as short as 5 days.

    And since it is NEVER ILLEGAL to make Linux CD-ROMs, legality wise there shouldn't be ANY PROBLEM.

    So, next time if you wanna make CDs, or you have a rush job and still want to have high quality CDs made, give Malaysia a call.

    You won't be disappointed !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  58. Small-and-Flaccid� been doing this for years... by StandardCell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember nine years ago when I was shopping for a top of the line PC (at that time, a 486DX-2/66). I walked into a local computer superstore and told them what I wanted; however, I also wanted to save a few bucks and just have the hard drive boot to a DOS prompt, no more.

    The salesperson was very pushy and asked "well what are you going to install on there?" and I of course responded "anything - SCO Unix (note: what irony, little did I know...), Linux, BSD...why?" Well, sadly, I was informed by the salesperson there that I "would not be receiving a hardware warranty if I did not order it with Windows."

    Needless to say, I walked out shortly thereafter and later learned that this was a common practice at the time and at later points in time. The moral of the story is that anything that Microsoft might have its grubby little hands, in any form, may affect the average Joe in unimaginable ways, and many imaginable ones. Just like me, and just like the folks trying to legally dupe CDs.

    1. Re:Small-and-Flaccid� been doing this for years... by krray · · Score: 1

      Jeez, I make comments like this against Microsoft and those posts get flamed to TROLL. How funny.

      I too went to my local mom/pop shop that was Microsoft Certified Partner among others. They also do Netware and that's where I wanted a little backup (just in case :).

      I go with them because they work with me. They have no issues with me cracking a case and pulling the power supply and handing it to them for warranty replacement.

      The day I walked in and tried to purchase NO OPERATING SYSTEM PC's (to run Linux) as was told they couldn't sell them to me that way was the day I literally stopped using Microsoft Windows.

      I paid the Microsoft tax to get the hardware -- and those PC's still run Linux to this day. For every Windows license I've had to purchase (I am the IT mgr here :) there have been three Linux or OS.X boxes going out the door with it.

      All over a few thousand dollars in Windows licensing. I swear Microsoft can't see the forrest through the trees sometimes. Ironic that our corporate network has -0- Windows servers and has now about 35% Windows desktops and dropping off every year.

    2. Re:Small-and-Flaccid� been doing this for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in mid 2000, the dotcom I work for was just a small startup. The founders picked Gateway as the preferred vendor, since they would preload Linux on the servers for us. We bought 4 of their higher end servers, they came loaded with redhat, and stickered for Win2000. the MS cd was in the box. We had no problems with 3 of the machines, but the 4th had some hardware glitches with the embedded ethernet.
      Gateway tech support would not talk to us because we were using " third party software" on the machine! They would only troubleshoot if it had Windows NT or Windows2000 on the box. Explaining that THEY installed the OS, 3 identical machines had no problems had no effect on the support staff, up through 3 tier.

      The CEO got involved, had our accounts rep issue a return bill for all 4 machines, and he went to the local pc shop and bought no name clones, they are still running today!

      Gateway must be a wholey owned subsidiary of MS to clame that anything but windows is "third party software"

    3. Re:Small-and-Flaccid� been doing this for years... by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! Usually it's hard for businesses to
      see the benefit of migrating from their "normal" OS to the "mysterious" Linux OS. How did you make them see the light? Did you have to handle retraining the end users to use Linux? How did you accomplish this? How about your IT staff, did they quickly get upto speed on Linux or did you have to rotate Windows people out and bring in employees with a 'nix background. Excuse me for so many questions, but I am sure there are more people out there who would like to get some ideas on how to migrate their company over to Linux from Windows.

      Thank you,

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
  59. Its not about the SCO lawsuit ! by Mr+Europe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The SCO lawsuit is not preventing copying Linux cd's as timothy wrote !
    Software images just has a non-competement agreement with Microsoft.

    1. Re:Its not about the SCO lawsuit ! by vidarh · · Score: 4, Informative
      Read the bloody article. Especially this part:

      Yesterday Software Images declined to do the job, citing intellectual property concerns.

      When questioned by the Herald on Friday, Software Images chief executive Allan Morton said his company's wariness of Linux was due to legal action between SCO and Linux over intellectual property issues.

  60. I have a vision..... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of angry villagers, marching up the road with pitchforks and torches in hand.

    Er, what's the name of that street in Redmond??

    1. Re:I have a vision..... by Brynath · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One Microsoft Way

    2. Re:I have a vision..... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      At least Apple has a sense of humor

      " Apple
      1 Infinite Loop"

      ( from http://www.apple.com/contact/)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:I have a vision..... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Is that their address, or their philosophy?

    4. Re:I have a vision..... by Brynath · · Score: 1
      both

      scary ain't it?

  61. The whole SCO issue could backfire... by RoLi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you take a deep breath, take a step back and look at the facts:

    • IBM only got into trouble because they messed with proprietary software (SCO's).
    • Never was anybody successfully sued for using free software. So far nobody was even unsuccessfully sued, remember that SCO has so far only put out threats and not sued anyone. (And they won't.) In the commercial software world, suing and fining users is just normal business. Just look at how many companies are getting fined by the BSA every year.
    • When SCO has lost their case (and they will), a lot of people will see that the OSS licenses are indeed the only "no sue" and "no hassles" licenses.

    I think Microsoft made a big mistake with the whole SCO thing. The more people are aware of licenses and the more people understand the GPL, the worse Microsoft looks in comparison.

    The SCO case does hurt Linux in the short term, that's for sure. But in the long term, it will be just a confirmation of what many already know: That users of GPLed software are much safer from legal problems than users of commercial software.

    With the millions of shares Microsoft executives sell constantly, maybe they don't care about the long term...

    1. Re:The whole SCO issue could backfire... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 4, Informative

      remember that SCO has so far only put out threats and not sued

      No, they have formally filed suit. What they haven't done is gone into court, which promises to be intensely amusing, and not in a good way for SCO.

      What they have threatened is to reveal evidence that would be damaging to IBM and give them control of Linux. Anybody who has actually looked at the details of the situation knows this is just verbal flatulence, with overtones of commercial fraud.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    2. Re:The whole SCO issue could backfire... by expro · · Score: 1

      They clearly have not filed suit against Linux distributors -- only against a Unix licensee for his Unix license.

    3. Re:The whole SCO issue could backfire... by RoLi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sorry, I did not make that clear in my post: They never sued anybody for using Linux, they sued IBM for messing with their proprietary software.

      What they have threatened is to reveal evidence that would be damaging to IBM and give them control of Linux. Anybody who has actually looked at the details of the situation knows this is just verbal flatulence, with overtones of commercial fraud.

      Exactly.

    4. Re:The whole SCO issue could backfire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IBM only got into trouble because they messed with proprietary software (SCO's).

      This has yet to be proven. And you repeat it again in your next post.
      Please don't further the FUD by saying that IBM messed with SCO's proprietary software. You might also consider that the word proprietary in this context is, at best, dubious. SCO continued to release its own version of Linux for quite some time after filing suit, making proprietary not so proprietary.
    5. Re:The whole SCO issue could backfire... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it's even less than that. I think, not sure, that they are saying that while they were working with IBM, IBM developed some softwear which they jointly held as a trade secret, and which IBM later included in Linux, devaluing their ownership (which they had shared with IBM).

      The allegations range all over the map, but I *think* that's what the court filing alleged. (Of course, I think I heard that they ammended it..but I don't know in what way.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  62. What are we trying to achive?? by jkrise · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem isn't one of piracy - you can't pirate GNU / Linux - it's free. The fact is MS-SCO is spreading their FUD globally (where I live, Gartner is actively carrying the SCO FUD). Joe ServicePack's attention span and analytical-skills must not be over-estimated.

    By moving the CD copying to Malaysia, it's sort of implied that there's some pirating going on here! Newbies to Linux don't need this FUD - it could deter a few of them from joining the fest.

    Yesterday's interview, McBride stated that the case is entering a 'discovery' phase - this clearly indicates that SCO is only interested in FUD, and not a quick court action. It would help if more countries follow the example of Germany, Poland and others in exposing SCO's conduct, and seek penalties for future instances of FUD.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      actually, you *can* pirate linux. try redistributing it without following the GPL. if you don't follow the GPL, you fall back on basic copyright...which would not allow you to redistribute it legally, hence, piracy.


      1-2-3

    2. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A FUD modifier here at slashdot would also help.

    3. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A contract with Microsoft bans a CD duplicating company from making Linux CDs. That is a restraint of trade, banned by most anti-trust law. I do not know about in New Zealand specifically, though. Maybe it is legal there.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    4. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Quarters · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yesterday's interview, McBride stated that the case is entering a 'discovery' phase - this clearly indicates that SCO is only interested in FUD, and not a quick court action.

      That 'discovery phase' that you incorrectly put into quotes isn't some made up thing that SCO is using to delay a court action. Discovery is a part of every litigation that happens. Unlike TV courtroom dramas where the defense introduces some amazing new evidence at the last minute, thus saving the day, in real court cases both sides know *everything* the other side knows *before* the trial even starts. There are no surprises and no 11th hour miracles.

      The fact that the litigation is now in discovery does not in any way, shape, or form, indicate that SCO is just interested in FUD.

      Geez, if you can't be bothered to learn even a little bit of how the court system works at least go rent a copy of, "My Cousin Vinny". Discovery is covered very well in that movie by Marisa Tomei.

    5. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by krilli · · Score: 1

      By moving the CD copying to Malaysia, it's sort of implied that there's some pirating going on here! Newbies to Linux don't need this FUD - it could deter a few of them from joining the fest.

      Hardly.

      Finally using Malaysia to manufacture CDs that are actually legal is all that much prettier.

      Now that we are aware of the fact that the link between piracy and Malaysia exists, we must use it to our advantage, not make it stop us.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    6. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you talking about? In that movie Marisa Tomei's character was a surprise expert witness put on the stand at the last minute to present a dazzling display of automotive knowledge and trounce the prosecution's case by using obscure knowledge. :)

      Other than that, your statement is correct.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    7. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by breadbot · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The article isn't clear (okay, the Microsoft guy in the article isn't clear), but it doesn't seem like the Microsoft non-compete agreement is being invoked -- it's more like Software Image got nervous about the SCO suit and said that it's the Linux users' responsibility to show that they own or license the relevant intellectual property.

      So how would one prove to a skeptic that one has a right to use the intellectual property contained in a Knoppix distro? That's a lot of code, and I doubt its covered by just one license!

    8. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by ChartBoy · · Score: 1
      where I live, Gartner is actively carrying the SCO FUD

      Gartner has been Bill's marketing b*tch for many years. I've never seen a study from them that didn't bend over backwards to promote an M$ technology or product. FUD (combined with "nobody ever got fired for buying M$") are standard themes in their presentations.

    9. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      But she doesn't introduce any new evidence, only new interpretations of existing evidence.

    10. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      There can be 11th hour new evidence. But the Judge must say it is okay. And the other side gets adequate time to prepare their response to this new evidence. This is keeping with the idea that the "other" side (whichever one that is) always gets to question, cross examine, argue, scrutiniize, refute, re-interpret, etc. everything that is presented.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    11. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --That 'discovery phase' that you incorrectly put into quotes isn't some made up thing that SCO is using to delay a court action. Discovery is a part of every litigation that happens. Unlike TV courtroom dramas where the defense introduces some amazing new evidence at the last minute, thus saving the day, in real court cases both sides know *everything* the other side knows *before* the trial even starts. There are no surprises and no 11th hour miracles.--

      I think if there is new evidence that was not known before the trial but was discovered during the trial, I think it can be entered in, although both sides and the Judge would have to know about it before it could be presented.

      Disclaimer - I'm not a lawyer.

    12. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "in real court cases both sides know *everything* the other side knows *before* the trial even starts. There are no surprises and no 11th hour miracles."

      Perhaps someone might like to point this out to SCO, then? They have done nothing but obfuscate over the nature of their complaint since the beginning. After all, you can't have FUD without UD.....

    13. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by topham · · Score: 1

      Gartner provides self-fullfilling prophesies to the 'decision makers'.

      If you release 4 products that are identical except for branding Gartner will find a way to declair one of them the winner, and, low and behold, 6-8 months later they'll be right...

      Gartner has it's uses, but when you spend $1500 on a report and fail to take it's advise you look like an idiot...

    14. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Discovery can also be used as an excuse to go on a fishing expedition through proprietary information. Infact, McBride has already explicitly declared interest in such activities. Also, certain parties like to drag their feet during discovery. Sometimes they even get sanctioned for it. So, SCO can certainly use discovery as a method to delay this case coming to trial.

      Given what they've said so far, it's a bit naive to assume that they won't abuse the discovery process.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    15. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      the case is entering a 'discovery' phase

      I can't help but keep reading this as disc-covery every time I see it in the disc-cussion here.

      yes, [sic]

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    16. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All of this bunch belong in JAIL!!! The SCO Bunch for attempting to "pump 'n' dump" their stock at Linux's expense And Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer for TREASON for displaying their source code to COMMUNIST CHINA and having as their second largest businass partner a company from the national homeland of AL QUIDA, All of this in order to continue to prop up their TREASONOUS ONE WORLD "Global Corperation" MONOPOLY!!!

    17. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      Geez, if you can't be bothered to learn even a little bit of how the court system works at least go rent a copy of, "My Cousin Vinny".

      Good plan. Let's all learn the basics of the legal system by watching movies. The folks writing movies wouldn't mislead us...

    18. Re:What are we trying to achive?? by Azathoth!EDC · · Score: 1

      The movie "My Cousin Vinny" was directed by Jonathan Lynn, not Marisa Tomei.

      uk-hyuk ;)

  63. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Heartz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    CD Pirates are one of the primary reasons why Linux is gaining ground in Malaysia. They are cheap, and have all the latest titles. Linux enthuthiast who need the latest ISO's just needs to go to his local pirate distributor and usually in 2-3 days, you'll be able to get a copy. Especially useful for those of us who don't have Broadband internet at home.

    They are also actively promoting Linux to businesses who are looking for alternatives to microsoft during the latest software piracy crackdown.

    Pirates have brought linux to Malaysia! Pirates aren't that bad after all ;)

  64. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, that's a bit too late, recent police and government crackdowns have more or less crippled these duplication rings. I know, I live in Malaysia where everyone is complaining about not being to buy VCDs or DVDs for less than USD2.00 anymore (at least not easily :) Yes, what you want are LEGAL duplications as opposed to the illegal pirated ones, but the point is that the cheap CD makers are the pirates and their machines have just been consfiscated, so tough.

  65. No no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You are going about it all wrong. Here's how it works:

    I was checking out their web page and it's pretty slick. Each time you go to it, they feed you a graphic of a different person up top. Presumably employees, although they could be models. Anyway, I reloaded the page (shift-reload in moz) a few times checking to see how many different ones they had, and imagine my surprise when, after about six hundred reloads, up popped Natalie Portman, nude and petrified!!!!!

    I guess it's an easter egg, pretty well hidden too, not like the managers are going to sit there and shift-reload over and over again, no-one but the horny nerd that did the page for him and maybe some of his friends, and all the horny nerds here at slashdot now that I discovered it. Yipeee! Make sure and save the image once it comes up, otherwise you have to do the whole thing from scratch to see it again.

  66. XPLite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://www.litepc.com/xplite.shtml

    1. Re:XPLite by MadJo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      isn't this just a leetle beet off topic?

  67. Another SCO article? by screenrc · · Score: 1
    Hi guys, there is more in life than
    tracking the Caldera/SCO story minute-by-minute.
    Most of you already agree that SCO is full
    of it, then why not behave the way you always do? Like when someone posts on Slashdot
    wild allegations without evidence, you
    would moderate SCO as "troll" and that is the end of it.


    For God's sake, enough with SCO already!

  68. Public Telephone Numbers by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    In the 1980s, the prime minister of new zealand had his home phone number listed in the phone book (under Muldoon, Rt. Hon. Sir Robert). He said he hardly ever got any crank calls.

    In the 2000s, a movie (Bruce Almighty) has a phone number in it that doesn't start with 555 and various people around the world get called up to 20 times an hour asking if they are God.

    Maybe the proliferation of crank calls on tv and radio shows, and email spam has led to this being seen as acceptable by the public? Not fun for the person on the receiving end though.

    1. Re:Public Telephone Numbers by dago · · Score: 1

      In 2003, the (current) president of Switzerland still has its home phone number listed in the phone book (you can even got it on internet).

      He also has the small '*' which states 'Do not desire to receive advertisements' .

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
  69. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    [~]% telnet linuxforums.co.nz 80
    Trying 202.49.94.189...
    Connected to linuxforums.co.nz.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    GET / HTTP/1.0

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
    Content-Location: http://192.168.0.1/index.html
    Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:37:07 GMT
    Content-Type: text/html
    Accept-Ranges: bytes
    Last-Modified: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:40:04 GMT
    ETag: "86a02fd94f34c31:927"
    Content-Length: 2220

  70. Ha! by TheDredd · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet if I walked in there with a copy of UT 2003 and asked for 500 copies of it they would say: "No problem, mr Smith"

    1. Re:Ha! by MadJo · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, I think they would refuse it. Because it is not a Microsoft product.

  71. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by mirko · · Score: 2, Funny

    rejection rate of less than 0.5 %
    So, that means in doubt they should burn 3 more CDs to have the 500 required.
    Will this help them benefit from the 501-1000-unit batch cheaper than the 1-500-unit one ?

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  72. Well, they can sue SCO for fiancial damage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is caused by the SCO case, the NZ linux group can sue SCO for that.

  73. Non-compete: fuzzy is a good thing? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Roberts said "like all good non-compete clauses it isn't [clear cut]. Each situation will have to be evaluated case by case"."

    Shouldn't legal contracts be clear? Or is eaving plenty of weasel-room a tactic by lawyers to leave room for the FUD to spread.

    1. Re:Non-compete: fuzzy is a good thing? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > leaving plenty of weasel-room a tactic by lawyers

      You nailed the hammer on the head.... or something.

    2. Re:Non-compete: fuzzy is a good thing? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1
      Not if you intend to win, and you're anything like evenly matched.

      It is possible Microsoft likes fuzzy because they have armies of lawyers and can beat the United States of America: that is not true for most people.

      In any normal healthy situation, very clear-cut noncompete agreements that don't get greedy or overreach are WAY better, because if you go to court with them, you won't lose. If it's fuzzy or greedy or ridiculous, there's a good chance your noncompete agreement will lose, and you'll wind up with nothing.

      Seems like monopolists distort EVERYTHING, right up to and including what is to be considered normal and sensible in the legal sphere. NO, if you are not a corporation more powerful than any individual nation-state in the f**king world, you should not make your legal contracts ambiguous and plan to march upon a road of FUD... in fact in any healthy society it will be better to communicate clearly, draw clear boundaries and be honest. That is a winning social strategy among peers, because it means you can be interacted with predictably, and trusted to do what you say.

      What Microsoft does is Mob thinking. I'd love to see them all jailed. I suppose killed would be nice, too. Not a joke, I would like to see that happening. I honestly think the damage these people does, goes WAY beyond the obvious.

  74. In this case bad publicity is good by jolyonr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The replicators are probably loving all the harsh publicity they are getting in Slashdot and around the Linux community, anything they do to upset and aggrivate the Open Source world will probably score them bonus points with Microsoft. The more we bitch about them here, the more Microsoft will love them.

    However, they'll need to be careful, dealing with Microsoft is not something I would envy - I met someone once who used to work with them, and he told me that ".. the only time M$ wouldn't piss all over you is if you were on fire."

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:In this case bad publicity is good by zummit · · Score: 1

      Someday these CD replicators may not be needed as everything (software, entertainment, etc.) might be delivered via big ol' fat pipes.

  75. Good!! by powerlord · · Score: 1

    Not only does MS acknowledge that Linux is a competitor (Pepsi vs. Coke so we must be on par :grin:), but we get to be Coke, the obviously superior choice :p

    (especially with choices like cherry, vanilla and lemon)

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  76. You are looking at the wrong company by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    The CD duplication company is not a monopoly, but MS is (at last legally, in the US). They may be limited in what kind of anti-competitive contracts they are allowed to enter.

  77. Email / Phone # by Jaysyn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let's Slashdot em' & tell them how dumb that was.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  78. The Sheriff of Nottingham by mousse-man · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like we need a new Robin Hood who shoots the Sheriff of Nottingham and gives software to the poor.

    1. Re:The Sheriff of Nottingham by HiThere · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read your Robin Hood a bit more carefully.. Whenever possible Robin Hood *humiliated* his enemies. He tried to avoid killing them. (Though he did make them walk home barefoot and in their underwear..or occasionally tied backwards on a horse.) But he carefully robbed them of all the wealth they were carrying.

      I'm not sure whether the Normans had a rule about "kill one of us and we'll kill ten of you", but that's a rule that dominant agressors have used frequently. So Robin Hood acted in such a way that it wouldn't have mattered if it had existed.

      Note also that justice didn't have much to do with either sides actions. Or at least not always. (The Robin Hood of legend was much more heroic than I can imagine in a real person.)

      I say the Robin Hood of Legend, because the name doesn't seem to attach well to any one historic character, though there are tales that attach to various outlaws which are also attached to Robin Hood. I suspect that if the deeper roots were followed there would be a connection between Robin Hood (i.e., Robin i' the Hood), and Robin Goodfellow (alias Puck). And, quite possibly, to the English bird... (Not to the US bird called a robin, which is a different species with a much less feisty temperment.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:The Sheriff of Nottingham by whig · · Score: 1

      Well said. Robin Hood is portrayed as a playful thief, but his main claim was to the rights of the people to the forests, which had been claimed by private interests under the English enclosures acts. This left many poor people without a right to live and support themselves, but on the terms set by the local lord. Therefore, all the wealth which the lords flaunted about themselves were in effect stolen in the first place from the peasants.

      --
      Peace and love, y'all
  79. Report them to the Commerce Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is anti-competitive behaviour.

    Raising Your Concerns by Contacting the Commission

    Readers who are aware of behaviour that appears to breach the Commerce Act can forward information to the Commission. The Commission will consider this information and, if appropriate, initiate an investigation.
    The Commission also carries out its own market monitoring and surveillance activities. An investigation that identifies a breach of the Commerce Act may lead to the Commission taking one of a range of actions, including prosecuting businesses in the High Court. Actions the Commission can take are outlined in the Commission Processes section of this publication.

    To contact the Commission with information:
    Telephone 0800 94 3600
    Write to:

    Contact Centre
    Commerce Commission
    P O Box 2351
    Wellington

    Email: contact@comcom.govt.nz

    http://www.comcom.govt.nz/publications/pdfs/anti -c ompetitive%20practices%20final.pdf

    Put Software Images out of business.

    1. Re:Report them to the Commerce Commission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done! Polite mail sent.

  80. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    CD Pirates are one of the primary reasons why Linux is gaining ground in Malaysia. They are cheap, and have all the latest titles. Linux enthuthiast who need the latest ISO's just needs to go to his local pirate distributor and usually in 2-3 days, you'll be able to get a copy. Especially useful for those of us who don't have Broadband internet at home

    It's ironic that people will go to illegal channels as the most efficient way to get that which is free and legal anyway. Showing that distribution businesses do not need to own monopolies to be profitable.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  81. Re:weird.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry...this comment makes no sense whatsoever....

  82. Awh Crap! by rosewood · · Score: 0

    Man! I just stepped in a big pile of FUD.

    One day I want to sue my competition just to fuck my competition, even if I have no real case!

  83. That's not how it works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It typically works the other way. Standard Oil says "give me a rebate on my oil deliveries" to the railroad companies. Then, when they get low priority, Standard Oil says "Give me a rebate on my competitor's oil deliveries."

    Then when he finds out that he's not getting all the rebates he's asked for, he hauls them into a room. "Gentlemen, you have been cheating me. I could sue you in court and win, but I'm not going to. I'm simply going to ruin every one of you." And Rockefeller (because that's who this is) did.

    That's monopolistic practice. Not "don't do our competitor's CDs, see, we'll pay you a little extra not to do it." It's instead, "don't do our competitor's CDs. If you do, well, Garnett there did, and look, all of a sudden he lost his business with the RIAA, and the postal service didn't deliver his finance payment on time, and all his bills came due at once, and look... really, it's better not to do our competitor's CDs. I'm sure you understand."

    Not that that's what happened here -- I have no idea what happened here. But that's the mold of a monopoly: just a touch of war.

  84. What is FUD? by reason100 · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what FUD is. Anyone care to enlighten me?

    -RLG

    1. Re:What is FUD? by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

      FUD = Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.
      RTFA = Read The Flaming(*) Article.


      * There was a bit of a crackle on the line as the person said this word, but I can't think of anything else that would fit.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:What is FUD? by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Companies use it when they have an inferior product to try to scare people away from their competitors. It usually only works on people who don't know the real merits of the products.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:What is FUD? by reason100 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I read the article you ass

    4. Re:What is FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like Linux users, huh?

    5. Re:What is FUD? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > FUD = Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

      When I first saw that acronym it meant "F*cked Up Data." Then, in the nineties, when everything technology was cool and they had to use acronyms on censored TV, they said things like "Read The Friendly Manual" and "Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt." At least, that's my take on it.

    6. Re:What is FUD? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      That wasn't an instruction, just a passing mention.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:What is FUD? by pyros · · Score: 1

      FUD meaning "Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt" comes from old IBM marketing campaigns, back when they were the ones in the anti-trust cross-hairs.

    8. Re:What is FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o ya in the context of this discussion I AM SOOO SURE he was referring to linux users!

    9. Re:What is FUD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fucking" would fit nicely.

    10. Re:What is FUD? by pod · · Score: 1
      they had to use acronyms on censored TV, they said things like "Read The Friendly Manual" and "Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt." At least, that's my take on it.

      That may be your take on it, but don't feel too smug, because it's the wrong take. Fear Uncertainty and Doubt has nothing to do with Fucked Up Data, and was certainly NOT created for its TV friendliness.

      And RTFM... do you expect some TV tech help dude or a sitcom actor to say the F word on TV? Of course they'll substitute something else that makes sense. Fuck .. friggin, shit .. crap, etc. Definitely nothing to do with coolness of anything.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    11. Re:What is FUD? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      No one ever got fired from MS for spreading FUD. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:What is FUD? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > And RTFM... do you expect some TV tech help dude or a sitcom actor to say the F word on TV

      No, I expect them to not use it at all. RTFM means what it means, and if the meaning of it offends someone, then don't use it at all, instead of trying to look smart by using acronyms (incorrectly).

  85. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pirates have brought linux to Malaysia!

    How do you think MS even got popular? Back in 1995-96 I hardly knew anyone with a legit copy of Win95, their computers all came with 3.1 and they borrowed 95 from a friend.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  86. Everyone, submit this story by autechre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the FAQ, if your submission was rejected by one editor, maybe another will approve it, and they also appear to cave if many people keep submitting the same story.

    I want to believe that this can't be completely legal. Does Thailand have any "illegal dumping" laws like (IIRC) the U.S.? Also, if this deal goes through, it might make interesting ammunition the next time Microsoft tries to "estimate" costs of illegal copying. Wait, how much is Windows really worth again? Retail, OEM, or $6? Along those lines, I wonder if any of Microsoft's big customers will be annoyed that someone else is getting a much better deal than they are.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    1. Re:Everyone, submit this story by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Well, Microsoft just landed their biggest contract for a whopping $470 million(about $950/copy).
      With whom? Why, the US gov't, of course!

    2. Re:Everyone, submit this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing how adaptable Microsoft is with their pricing. $6 to the people of Thailand, $950 to the government.

      It doesn't cost Microsoft anything to run off a few thousand extra copies, essentially legitimizing the practices that have been going on since Windows 3.1 (hey, could I grab a copy of Windows from you?). Except now it's legal, and the "copies" are $6 officially sanctioned Microsoft products.

      They get to have it both ways. High prices for those that will pay, and people still using their products even when they can't afford it.

  87. Proof Positive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that M$ is REALLY worried about Linux.

    And yet another example of M$ innovation. When threatened by a competing product, they:
    1. spread FUD about the competition.
    2. litigate; either directly or through secondary parties that they manage to pump cash into.
    3. lean on their partners (for today, anyway; they'll get it in the back tomorrow) to leverage their monopoly position.
    4. do anything, ANYTHING except compete on the technical superiority of their product because they have none and they are not about to provide any!

    It's all kind of sad, really.

  88. You CAN pirate Gnu/Linux - 2 ways by abe+ferlman · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Offer the binaries without a corresponding offer for the source code.

    2. Hijack the ship coming from Malaysia with all the linux cd's. Equipment you'll need: eyepatch, parrot, pegleg, makeshift plank for the crew to walk, silly accent. Say "Yarrrrrr!" a lot and complain about scurvy.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    1. Re:You CAN pirate Gnu/Linux - 2 ways by henrygb · · Score: 1
      Hijack the ship coming from Malaysia with all the linux cd's. Equipment you'll need: eyepatch, parrot, pegleg, makeshift plank for the crew to walk, silly accent. Say "Yarrrrrr!" a lot and complain about scurvy.

      In fact, the Weekly Piracy Report suggests that a ship from Malaysia to New Zealand could have to travel through the most pirate infested part of the world.

    2. Re:You CAN pirate Gnu/Linux - 2 ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and sodomise the cabin boy.

  89. Thailand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really illegal to go commando in Thailand?

    1. Re:Thailand by hesiod · · Score: 1

      >Is it really illegal to go commando in Thailand?

      WTF does that mean?

  90. Or lie. by autechre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take screenshots of what happens when you go through winipcfg and put them on your hard drive. Then just browse through them and pretend you're actually doing it.

    Comcast doesn't seem to care what I run; they say something to the effect of, "OK, well you'll have to set that up yourself." As long as my DHCP client works, they don't seem to care that it's OpenBSD. I know I've checked my end, so I sometimes tell them I don't run Windows (if they start going into details), and sometimes just tell them what they want to hear. Besides, the lights on the cablemodem are generally what they ask about first, and they can do some diagnostics (and even upgrade the firmware) from their end.

    If they service your area, Speakeasy DSL is actually friendly to *nix-like operating systems (and people who want to run servers). Sadly, now my cable bandwidth has been increased and I am lazy. Maybe one day Comcast will actually become the NAT/upload fascists they claim to be.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  91. Coke/Pepsi by poincare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:
    "It's very much a Coke/Pepsi situation. If you are an ad agency dealing with Pepsi you don't pick up business with Coke."

    This seems like a legitimate reason to refuse a Linux job. In the current climate it's clear to most that Linux is strong competition to Microsoft. I'm suspect that there exists at least one other company offering similar services, which isn't doing business with Microsoft directly, and can see the value in becoming a provider for the Linux community.

  92. We need to do something about this issue. by ekran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the Linux community has to draw a line and say that enough is enough. And I think we have to sue SCO over this issue. If not, then our problems with SCO will escalate and in the end hurt Linux. This incident in New Zealand only proves this.

    1. Re:We need to do something about this issue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck? This has *NOTHING* to do with the SCO case, you numb waste of an orgasm. Go fuck yourself.

  93. Linux has GPL, unlike BSD by expro · · Score: 1

    So, there have been no contributions to BSD since that piece of paper was written? Unlike BSD, Linux has a GPL proving they don't owe SCO a thing.

    1. Re:Linux has GPL, unlike BSD by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Funny, the BSD systems also have a license saying they don't owe SCO anything either.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:Linux has GPL, unlike BSD by expro · · Score: 1

      But not one that only grants use of the code to someone who does not use their own IPR to restrict use of the code, such as Caldera distributed Linux under. To me, that is a big difference.

    3. Re:Linux has GPL, unlike BSD by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Completely beside the point. The BSD license still says I don't owe SCO shit.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  94. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >It's ironic that people will go to illegal channels as the most efficient way to get that which is free and legal anyway

    No, it's ironic that most people, including the justice department that brought the action against them, still use products from a company convicted of illegally leveraging a monopoly.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  95. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not post a website? anything to get one started? or are you just making some judgement on how all the pirated cds come from malaysia?

    1800-malay-cds? ;p

  96. Two words. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Fair trade.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  97. Re:Helping the cause by soloport · · Score: 3, Insightful

    just wait until you buy a shiny new piece of hardware and install it... or a game... i wouldn't delete that windows install just yet

    Plenty of shiny new hardware breaks Windows -- in fact, so does a lot of old hardware.

    I play Quake, Unreal Tournament, America's Army, etc. on Linux. Can't think of any better games that I'd want to play on Linux -- nor any that I can't.

    Are you just a lttle behind the times? Fear is usually fought with fear; There's nothing more fearful, at times, than change.

  98. A few bits of interest... by node159 · · Score: 1

    The New Zealand Hearld is an unreliable paper, they get basically everything wrong one way or the other (to cite an example, they can't even get the name right for a 700 people land, that had everybody playing CS 'against terrorism' on ONE server). So thier take might be completly off...

    NZ is small, if you have a contact with Microsoft, you do everything you can to please them. Otherwise they might cancel the contact next time it comes up for review. Which in NZ could mean the company would have to scale back significantly or even shut down.

    Ohh and yes, MS is a big boy in this country and throws its weight around quite happily.

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  99. Why the fuss? by jopet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Go to their competitor and let them do the job.

    1. Re:Why the fuss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuss is to make sure EVERYBODY goes to their competitor.

  100. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of shiny new hardware breaks Windows -- in fact, so does a lot of old hardware.

    You can't just talk out of your ass and expect people to believe you. I've purchased plenty of shiney new hardware in the past and I have never had any compatibility issues with Windows.

  101. He is not joking BTW... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I shudder at the posibility of naming a street after Billy bot himself.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  102. ObSimpsons reference by gosand · · Score: 1
    They lose almost nothing, while they are sucking up to M$, possibly gaining much more with the obfuscated licensing. I assume M$ will gladly pay their losses, considering the press coverage this thing will get.


    Yeah, right. ObSimpsons reference:

    Homer: I reluctantly accept your proposal!

    Bill Gates: Well everyone always does. Buy 'em out, boys!
    [Gates' lackeys trash the room.]

    Homer: Hey, what the hell's going on!

    Bill Gates: Oh, I didn't get rich by writing a lot of checks! [insane laughter]

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  103. Screw the CD duplicators by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just work out a user friendly way to install from the internet. Older versions of RedHat used to install via FTP. Gentoo installs over the net. What "Joe Average" needs is a happy medium:

    -They pop open IE in Windows and go to the "Install Linux" web site and start the procedure.
    -It brings down a self extracting tar.bz2 archive which expands to %TEMP%.
    -It also creates another file that stores the actual location of %TEMP% in Windowspeak.
    -It then executes a Windows based binary that will format a floppy, a bootable ZIP or Jaz disk or burn a CD-R/RW as bootable medium.
    -It also unpacks file that contains an ext2 filesystem to %TEMP%

    When the floppy, Zip, Jaz or CD-R/RW are complete, the user is instructed to reboot with the new boot disk. When they do, they are first presented with a partition manager that allows them to resize their Windows partition and set up space for the Linux installation. Then the file with the ext2 filesystem is mounted and the real GUI based installation begins pulling the distro from the internet. (Network configuration, X with framebuffer support, etc... has already completed in the background)

    Obviously this would only be suitable for people with high bandwidth, but that could be solved too... The installer should allow the user to pause the installation and shutdown so that they can do it in phases. When they reboot, the installer would see the partially installed system and allow them to continue from where the log indicates that the install left off.

    CDs need to go away as an installation medium.

    1. Re:Screw the CD duplicators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I do not agree with that! All too often, people take the huge persence of the Internet as something that will always be there, like air!

      At the very least, you have to bring up a virgin system to the point where it can connect to the Internet. I and my son have many, many friends who bring their new or existing (but in need of upgrading) system over to my house so that they have access to my expertise BUT also so that they have access to a working Internet connection to be able to download drivers, patches, etc. before their system is capable of hitting the Internet.

      Now, I could see a minimal Linux boot CD (ala Knoppix) to bring the system up enough to connect to a LAN (or perhaps even to the Internet) and then initiate the download and install process. If bandwidth is a problem (500 machines!), poerhaps a local server with install files could be used. Hell, with newer system and PXE, you wouldn't even need a CD.

      OOOPs! maybe I'm back to the parent's post! Never mind!

    2. Re:Screw the CD duplicators by SickKiwi · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how much we pay for broadband here in NZ??? ie $70 for 1 gig traffic per month (both ways) or half that for a 5 gig International limit capped at 128k.

      Unfortunately at those prices it makes installing off the net not a viable option for most users.

  104. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you'd stated the opposite, you'd be accused of being a troll and astroturfer. Funny how things work, innit?

  105. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me too! Oh yeah, I don't run Windows, so of course I had no problems with it. :-)

    If you've never had problems with hardware in windows, you've never installed much more than the latest video card.

  106. Don't be dumb, child by Pac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get your facts straight, kiddo. It is not like Bill inherited a railroad empire from Dad, he build the godammed illegal monopoly from ground up, starting from a 3 man operation back in the seventies. You may question his business ethics, his excessive greed or whatever, but thinking he can't outsmart most of us with his hands tied and his eyes closed is dumb (and dangerous - underestimating the enemy is the fastest path to a unforgettable defeat).

    1. Re:Don't be dumb, child by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Get your facts straight, kiddo. It is not like Bill inherited a railroad empire from Dad, he build the godammed illegal monopoly from ground up, starting from a 3 man operation back in the seventies. You may question his business ethics, his excessive greed or whatever, but thinking he can't outsmart most of us with his hands tied and his eyes closed is dumb (and dangerous - underestimating the enemy is the fastest path to a unforgettable defeat).

      But know your enemy. Bill Gates isn't smart, he's canny, just like Al Capone was canny. Al Capone was succesful and rich as well, but like Bill Gates, he had little respect for the law. Ultimately the world learned that Al Capone wasn't all that smart, as he neglected to pay his income taxes and got life in Alcatraz for that.

      A more accurate way of looking at it: never underestimate how much it hurts to get bitten by a cornered weasel.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    2. Re:Don't be dumb, child by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Certainly his business acumen cannot be doubted. He had help, but he wasn't the only one. But I have no evidence indicating to me that he has ever exhibited much technical skill. (A bit, granted. Not just anyone could modify a Basic interpreter, and I believe that he actually did that, rather than just hiring it done.)

      But his main contributions are sharp business acumen and lack of ethics.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Don't be dumb, child by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      One wonders if Microsoft would have died right there and then if he had not successfully blackmailed MITS.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Don't be dumb, child by odin53 · · Score: 1

      FYI, Al Capone didn't neglect to pay his income taxes. He couldn't pay his income taxes, because if he did he would have admitted to committing all sorts of crimes. The beauty of the Internal Revenue Code is that it demands that you report ALL income, legally or illegally obtained. Obviously, Al Capone wasn't about to report his illegal activities to the federal government, but that meant he had to take the risk that the government could get him for income tax evasion.

    5. Re:Don't be dumb, child by cyberformer · · Score: 1

      This is why many big-time criminals use money-laundering schemes. It can be as simple as a drug dealer going to a casino, buying a bunch of chips and then cashing in his "winnings", or as complex as the web of off-balance-sheet partnerships created by Enron.

      Capone was just too arrogant and greedy. He didn't want to pay taxes, and thought he wouldn't get caught.

  107. Can you say Monopoly? by ikeleib · · Score: 1

    Good job, I thought you could.

  108. Microsoft's violations by _iris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if they denied to press Microsoft's discs when Microsoft was litigating the case brought against them by Caldera or the case with the DOJ.

  109. ...let's not go to NZ. It is a silly place. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    /python

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  110. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by carambola5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    -Hi, Malaysia? Is this Malaysia?
    -Yes sir. You have reached the tourist center for Malaysia. How may I help you?
    -I need 500 CDs burned fast!
    -Excuse me sir?
    -Like I said, I need 500 CDs burned and shipped before Saturday. I read about your country's amazing capabilities to do something like this on Slashdot and I figured I'd give it a shot.
    -I'm sorry sir, this is a tourist hotline.
    -Don't get smart with me, buddy. I know for a FACT that all you guys up in Malaysia are in the CD pirating business. Don't make me turn you in.
    -I'd be happy to refer you to our Business Bureau.
    -You don't get it! I don't want a bureau. I want some CDs. Legal CDs! Linux CDs! And you guys have to make them.
    -I'm sorry sir, but I just can't help you.
    -Sheesh. What do I need to do to get your country to make some CDs for me? Do I need to bribe you?
    -Sir, you'll have to contact someone else for your needs. I can't help you.
    -Sure you can. You're from Malaysia, and Malaysia makes CDs. Now what's it gonna take? Twenty dollars? A few shiny trinkets? You Malaysians go for that kind of stuff, right?
    -<click>

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
  111. Re:New Zealand is such a stupid place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, from what I hear, they're all sheep fuckers.

    "They're" is a contraction as well. It's (It is) a combination of "they" and "are". Why would they need to graduate 3rd grade if they can just go out in the field and fuck sheep?

  112. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've purchased plenty of shiney new hardware in the past and I have never had any compatibility issues with Windows.

    Whoops. I am an idiot. I totally forgot about all the problems I had with 2 of my last 3 computers. I take that back.

  113. Re:Helping the cause by Ktulu_03 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Welcome. Knoppix and Mandrake are two great distro's for beginners. After you've learned a bit, and want to learn more, I'd suggest trying another distro, like debian, redhat, or gentoo. Good luck... -Kevin

  114. Otherwise it wouldn't be funny by Pac · · Score: 1

    If Masters disallowed children-party clowns from being members and the Boy Scouts wouldn't accept three-legged iguana owners, we wouldn't be discussing it, would we?

  115. looking for employment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it seems that a lot of these people should be looking for legal employment, no? What better transition than to legally producing free software cds?

  116. Coke and Pepsi by eMartin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It's very much a Coke/Pepsi situation. If you are an ad agency dealing with Pepsi you don't pick up business with Coke."

    BS. This is more like telling some local kids with a lemonade stand that you can't help them because Pepsi doesn't like the competition.

  117. Across the board ... by royalblue_tom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In other news, companies supplying toilet paper, soda, coffee, cleaning products, and office space, to Microsoft in New Zealand may not supply companies using products that may compete with Microsofts' ...

    1. Re:Across the board ... by royalblue_tom · · Score: 1

      Offtopic ... hmmm. Let's see.

      Story - CD duplication firm declines to provide service, due to prior contract with Microsoft.

      Comment - implies other firms may also decline to provide service, purely on the basis of prior contracts with Microsoft (i.e. for products that any office based company might need). Aimed with a tongue in cheek attitude, looking to make (restraint of trade) point with slight humour.

      In the case of posting modded as Offtopic, I respectfully dissent.

  118. SCO Doesn't Scare Me - - I'm Eager For the Kill by LazloToth · · Score: 1


    Mr.Boies, heading the SCO "legal" team, epitomizes what a great many people despise about lawyers. Truth is not what Boies seeks - - it's billable hours, and SCO are the suckers who'll have to pay the bill. I'm sure that, by now, even Boies recognizes that there's no stopping the Open Source juggernaut. But why should he care about that? Even if his case is flushed down the crapper, he'll walk off with millions. Gates, likewise, will capitalize from this sad and misguided effort by SCO for a while. But I submit to you that even Gates sees the inevitable outcome, which, at the very least, is a MORE publicized Open Source movement. In the advertising world, all publicity, good or bad, is exposure which can be spun to one's own benefit. Unfortunately, SCO stockholders will profit from this very principle, too, even if their case tanks.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    1. Re:SCO Doesn't Scare Me - - I'm Eager For the Kill by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      As has been said countless times before, Boies is working on a "No win no fee" basis. I don't know where you get it from that it's otherwise.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:SCO Doesn't Scare Me - - I'm Eager For the Kill by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Where do YOU get this from?

      Is the contract between Boies and SCO now public knowledge?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:SCO Doesn't Scare Me - - I'm Eager For the Kill by LazloToth · · Score: 1


      Where did you get this information? I've not seen anything to suggest Mr. Boies' firm is working on a contingency basis. Links?

      --


      It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    4. Re:SCO Doesn't Scare Me - - I'm Eager For the Kill by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Erm, yeah. It's been mentioned, like, in virtually every write-up I've seen on the discussion. Entering "Boies contingency SCO" into Google will get you four pages of links of which most refer to the relationship.

      Where do YOU get it from that it isn't a contigency basis?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  119. microsoft is a burden on society by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Distributors ship it with computers because consumers expect it and never get exposed to anything better such as linux.

    Install fests give non-penguineers a chance to experience the glory, so Microsoft sees it as a threat.

    Just like AOL, Microsoft survives and advances by making deals with other companies and sucking them dry. Many companies are scared shitless of shipping a PC without Windows for fear of Microsoft contract revokation.

    Microsoft has made every computter manufacturer its bitch. On a whim they can revoke their agreement with Dell. Dell would then be forced to ship with another OS and drop their prices significantly or bribe their way back into Microsoft's stranglehold.

    You become a monopoly not by being the best in the market, but by being the fittest in the market.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  120. The problem with these "private" groups by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

    is they have a habit of multiplying when things get difficult. You know the disease starts spreading, or as all supremacy groups like to complain, "I hate xyz because they breed." Oh wait...

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
  121. Bullshit by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "It had more to do with his father being a wealthy and politically well-connected lawyer"

    Absolute Bullshit. Yeah, he came from a well off family. But his daddy didn't build Microsoft. He did. If anything, his family instilled a sense of drive and competitiveness in him that made him succeed. Just because you come from a family with some money doesn't guarantee success. How many rich families have we seen where the kids just weren't up to snuff with their parents? Can anybody say "Kennedy"?

    Bill Gates was more successful than his father ever was. Donald Trump came from a similar background. His dad was rich, but not super rich. He had the drive to succeed on levels far higher than his own father. Same with Ted Turner.

    No doubt, having families with money gave these guys an advantage when starting out, but please, be more honest. If they weren't any good themselves, they never would have succeeded. Period. Daddy's bucks can only help you so much.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Bullshit by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates was more successful than his father ever was. Donald Trump came from a similar background. His dad was rich, but not super rich. He had the drive to succeed on levels far higher than his own father. Same with Ted Turner.

      Well, looking at your posting record, you only ever have good things to say about Microsoft and Bill Gates, and perhaps not coincidently, only bad things to say about Linux and open source in general. I'm not sure I should trust your opinion of how well-connected Bill Gate's father was/is, or how little/how much he helped juniour get his start in life, let alone teaching him how to thumb his nose at the law.

      Furthermore, I suspect you normally post from an IP on the Redmond campus.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    2. Re:Bullshit by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha ha. Have you actually READ my posts? If you did, it was with a filter, seeing what you wanted to see. I'm an advocate of open source in general, and Linux in particular. I just don't live my life with ideological blinders. I'm active in my lug, and statewide with other Linux groups. Maybe I should resign because I don't fit your idea of what Linux user should be?

      Naaaa, ain't gonna do it. I'm not going sit back and accept whatever crap people throw out on the net, be it from OSS advocates or not. We could use a big dose of honesty, especially here on slashdot. And your comments on Gates sounded petty. I'm sick and tired of the MS chip we have on our shoulders, and when I smell bullshit, I'm going to call it.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    3. Re:Bullshit by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Everytime I ponder why Microsoft has %90+ marketshare and Linux does not, I come across a post like yours and realize why.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he came from a well off family. But his daddy didn't build Microsoft. He did. If anything, his family instilled a sense of drive and competitiveness in him

      I hate to nit pick... but this is a bad one.

      This is not the correct usage of 'if anything'. In your example it would have to be followed by something like 'if anything, they discouraged him and wanted him to become a lawyer like his dad'. I think the phrase you are looking for is 'at best'.

      Just a little FYI, I know /.ers appreciate this kind of help.

  122. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now you want a ... spanking?

    j/k - welcome to the club

  123. SCO sounds like the poor little rich kid... by karlandtanya · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Mommy's off shopping at Bloomie's, and Scooter is out playing with his new basketball...

    A new family has just moved into the neighborhood. They're a hippie bunch, they all work different jobs, and even the kids work around the house to help out. Mommy says they're kinda low-class.

    The primary purpose of the GNU organization is to create free software based on valuable commercial software.

    Translation: "Mommy, that new kid wants my spot on the team. He's picking on me."

    As long as the Linux development process remained uncoordinated and random, it posed little or no threat to SCO...

    Translation: "Hee Hee The new kid sucks."

    IBM initiated a course of conduct with the purpose and effect of using Linux to unfairly compete in the enterprise market.

    Translation: "That new kid's kicking my ass. Cheater!!!"

    It is not possible for Linux to rapidly reach UNIX performance standards for complete enterprise functionality without the misappropriation of UNIX code, methods or concepts to achieve such performance, and coordination by a larger developer, such as IBM.

    Translation: "My mommy bought me a whole home gym and personal trainer. That new kid must be using steroids."

    And, finally, this quote from IBM with which SCO takes issue in their complaint: ?IBM will put US $1 billion this year into Linux, the free operating system.

    Translation: "Hey! That new kid just got recruited by State!"

    Which makes the summary of the whole suit:

    "Mommy! Waaaa!!!"

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  124. MOD PARENT FUNNY, OK? by NeoNormal · · Score: 1

    How can the parent of this post not be modded "Funny"?

  125. MS-DOS 6 was hardly best in the market. by emil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The billions that Microsoft has earned, which have come at the cost of true innovation in our industry, emerged when Microsoft generated substandard copies of Lotus 1-2-3, WordPerfect, etc. (Eudora?) and packaged these absolutely inferior, substandard applications with integration that would have been impossible to achieve without control of the OS.

    I can't explain the reasoning behind Lotus' preference of OS/2 for 1-2-3 versus Windows (which helped kill them). I can't explain why WordPerfect stayed in the DOS world a little too long.

    One thing that I can say is that, if we had wanted the proprietary software market to survive, the antitrust trial should have happened in the late 80s, at about the same time that Microsoft started knifing DR-DOS in the back.

    Now, Microsoft has destroyed all the other major proprietary players on the desktop, and the industry has banned together behind GPL software in an effort to stop them.

    In the end, Microsoft is doomed. You can only charge for something that is free for so long.

    Perhaps the pity of it is that all of the other proprietary players will eventually go down as well. Eventually, all OS and major application software will be free. The GPL and BSD licenses will someday walk over Microsoft's grave. It is only a matter of time.

    1. Re:MS-DOS 6 was hardly best in the market. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You can't explain the reasons? These questions may help.

      How long the MS developers get to study the Windows APIs before they were released to the other companies? How much did access to the APIs cost those developers? How do you know?

      I don't know the answers...I remember, however, that there were questions (not answers) about them at the time Win95 was released. Possibly earlier.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  126. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Thuktun · · Score: 1

    Pirates have brought linux to Malaysia! Pirates aren't that bad after all ;)

    Pirates have also brought all sorts of Microsoft products to Malaysia. All Microsoft has to do now is to somehow convert their market penetration there into paying customers and they're set...

  127. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you like getting shit on, because that's how we treat the n00bs.

  128. Guns... Lots of guns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kinda shit is exactly why the US founding fathers detailed the right to bear arms. It's our last defense against bad politicians, the ultimate veto.

    It wont be done by an organized army of citizens, it will be more guerilla-style. Random people, sick of all the bullshit, randomly popping off politicians who have forgotten that their first responsibility is to the PEOPLE, not the megacorps.

    Something that's strongly needed, reminding them who they really serve, real people, not a fictitious legal entity. Instead of being primarily concerned with "which gives me the best kickback", they will be more concerned about "should I vote for bill x, or will I get popped off".

    Political terrorism at it's best.

  129. FUD & GAMES by MountainLogic · · Score: 3, Funny
    My favorite expansion is FUD & GAMES

    FUD = Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.
    GAMES = God Always Makes Engineers Suffer

    1. Re:FUD & GAMES by arcadesdude · · Score: 1

      eFfed Up Disinformation :)

      --
      --arcades
  130. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One time, I attached a USB CD-RW drive to my then Windows 2000 PC, and Windows 2000 stopped recognizing my regular, installed CD-ROM drive. Even after I unplugged and restarted the computer, I still couldn't use it.

    And then there was the "incident" that made me switch to Linux. Let's just say that waiting eighteen hours for the Windows 2000 to format my hard drive (after an error with Windows popped up) and having every attempt to reinstall Windows 2000 end in an error is not a pleasant experience.

  131. KNOPPIX Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What part of Bootable Linux on a CD son't you understand?
    The reason for giving the CDs out was to give the timid a working Linux distro that did not "invade or damage" their MS system.
    Knoppix is the perfect tool for demonstrating the power of Linux without the FUD of dual booting, repartitioning, etc etc that frightens the uninitiated.
    I carry a CD with me to night classes. I demo linux in the computer lab, freaking out the support people the first time I had linux pop up on their Secure Win2K machines

    1. Re:KNOPPIX Linux by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      The point is that bootable CDs as nice as they are should become a thing of the past. If anything, OSes should load over a LAN by now. (The network is the computer...)

  132. Guilty until proven innocent? by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    Surely thats the implication here - which is just plain wrong.

  133. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USD 0.25? Do you mean 25 cents?

    I've been buying my blank CDs in spools of 100 at SAMs for about 20 bucks which comes out to about 20 cents per CD. Sure, I have to burn them myself, but with the money saved for the CDs and shipping from Malaysia and pirate (eye patch/peg legged kind) insurance, I could buy a couple extra burners and have them done myself in a couple days.

  134. don't forget about Paladium. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates said you will be able to turn it off and run whatever software you want. Yeah, right. You can see the clear intention in every move Micrsoft makes.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  135. they want to keep their questionable deal with m$ by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    The problem isn't one of piracy - you can't pirate GNU / Linux

    Wake up and smell the bullshit. IT's got nothing to do with any piracy concerns. Microsoft got the duplicator to agree not to make Linux CDs. They want microsoft business a lot more than that want a tiny 500 CD order, so they are glad to play along. They admitted as much, but when it became clear that this would make public a bad and likely illegal business deal they started hiding behind claims that the MS deal was confidential and grabbed the SCO claim (likely at Microsoft's suggestion) as a reason they would not make the CD's. It's only an excuse, not a reason.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  136. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ironic that people will go to illegal channels as the most efficient way to get that which is free and legal anyway.

    The true irony is that as long as Microsoft doesn't crackdown on the pirates too much, they have a near monopoly on the legitimate and the black markets. But if Microsoft really cracks down on the software pirates, then that pushes the pirates customers to cheap, but legitimate alternatives like Linux.

  137. there are many non-Unix operating systems by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

    "Essentially every operating system on Earth" is an overstatement. OpenVMS is based on TOPS-10, TOPS-20 and RSX-11M; it owes nothing to Unix. IBM's OS/360 has roots older than Unix, as does the Burroughs B5000 Master Control Program. I believe CDC also has an operating system that is not derived from Unix.
    John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)

    1. Re:there are many non-Unix operating systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the artical you will see that SCO claims that *every* modern OS is a UNIX dirivative.

      Now that UNIX isnt a modern OS is becide the point but yes as SCO sees it *every* modern os would include OpenVMS (Digital created VMS, digital licenced UNIX, Digital created Dec UNIX, which became Tru64...) and all of IBM's OS's (remeber IBM couldn't creat an OS on its own till it licenced AT&T UNIX ;))

      Ya it doesnt make any sence to me either, but neither does any of SCO's reasoning.

  138. Re:Turn about is fair play! by Zoolander · · Score: 1

    Well, at least it was funny Flamebait... :D

    --
    Meep.
  139. WTF? by mark-t · · Score: 1
    "It's very much a Coke/Pepsi situation. If you are an ad agency dealing with Pepsi you don't pick up business with Coke."
    Could anyone explain to me why not?

    Okay... I can see that if you *ARE* Pepsi then you don't go around advertisng Coke, but if you're a third party agency that advertises whatever your clients pay for, why can't you advertise for both products? As a third party, you have no vested interest in the success of one over the other, so any claim of being unfair couldn't be substantiated.

    This claim smells almost as fishy as SCO's own claim.

    1. Re:WTF? by micq · · Score: 1

      As a third party, you have no vested interest in the success of one over the other, so any claim of being unfair couldn't be substantiated.

      I am not a marketing major, but I would say that an ad agency very much has an interest in their clients success. So much so that representing two clients of competitive nature, atleast inasmuch as Pepsi and Coke are, you can't be true to both, and it creates a problem.

  140. punish the perps, not the victim! by twitter · · Score: 1
    feedback@mss.co.nz

    It's the company address to http://www.microsoft.com/nz and Brett Robers.

    David is the victim here. He's had to refuse work for fear of M$. We can imagine they threatened to remove all bussiness from them as well as hit him with a lawsuit if he did not carefully read the provided script. It takes extraordinary character to stand up to a threat like that and we should not fault David for not sacrficing everything he owns.

    I imagine David's inbox is going to be crushed by a bunch of M$ paid trolls anyway. Making other people look bad is just another part of Microsoft's advertising budget. I don't put it past M$, famous for astroturf.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  141. that's true. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Software Images. They're not there for you. They're there for their major account - Microsoft.

    That's ture, Software Images has been forced to reject legitimate work and damage their reputation.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  142. Why not advertise both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    if you're a third party agency that advertises whatever your clients pay for, why can't you advertise for both products?
    For the same reason why the same law firm won't have (say, oh, I don't know...) both SCO and IBM as clients, when they're involved in litigation between each other.

    Posting as AC from work, but you know who I am
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO

  143. Re:Helping the cause by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I play Quake, Unreal Tournament, America's Army, etc. on Linux. Can't think of any better games that I'd want to play on Linux -- nor any that I can't.

    Agreed! I just got GTA3 Vice City yesterday. It installs and runs under Linux no problem, using WineX 3.1!

  144. Re:Helping the cause by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "I play Quake, Unreal Tournament, America's Army, etc. on Linux. Can't think of any better games that I'd want to play on Linux -- nor any that I can't."

    It'd devastate your argument if you tried to think of better games you'd want to play on Linux.

    You're only kidding yourself.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  145. Strategies for avoiding the problem altogether by Marrow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First: Setup network installation servers and perform as many installs as you can via ethernet.

    Second, try to install the machines that HAVE cd burners first, then use those machines to burn cds for the machines that cant be installed via the network.

    Third, call a competitor for the company you are having problems with and give them an opportunity to gain some ground on their rival.

    Welcome the challenge and have fun with it. The more you let these fools drag you down, the more you let them win. They don't deserve to win.

  146. Tell the full story about an illegal history by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    If he's so smart, then why can't he make a profit on anything besides his illegal monopolies?

    This is +5 insightful??! Microsoft started in a college dorm room......

    If you want to talk about the start of Microsoft, tell the full story. Bill started it, not in his dorm room, but by using an emulator for an 8080 at Harvard. He didn't even have an 8080 when they did the first basic interperator, it ran on an emulator on a Harvard school computer. Bill was caught doing this, and called to task for it. Seems it was illegal for him to be using the school computer for this private, business project! He was reportedly given the choice of stopping this improper use of Harvard's computer or leaving school, he elected to leave school.

    So Microsoft was started with an illegal act and has continued the tradition to this day. Lots of other good parts to the story too, like basic being released only on hardware memory boards that never did work. But if you're going to call Bill a businessman, be sure to add a phrase like "just like the Columbian drug lords or Al Capone".

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Tell the full story about an illegal history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He didn't even have an 8080 when they did the first basic interperator, it ran on an emulator on a Harvard school computer. Bill was caught doing this, and called to task for it. Seems it was illegal for him to be using the school computer for this private, business project!

      Any college student worth his salt will be willing to use college resources to further a money-making scheme. There's nothing wrong with this. Hell, it's the American way!
  147. Re:Helping the cause by Unordained · · Score: 1

    or slackware! (yes, gang up on the newbie with distribution-wars ...)

  148. Re:weird.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I/O access to the CMOS clock is slow. The support of both old and new processors does not imply instability.

    This so called "legacy" support exists in all PCs. Like your ugly PC with an 8042 in it driving your ugly dumb keyboard. Apples also have legacy.

    Nobody really understands what you are arguing about. Are you for some OS in particular over Linux? Windows, MacOS X, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, Irix, ... ?

    As a person who uses 5 of those operating systems on a daily basis I have to say that all operating systems pretty much suck.

    ps- NetBSD runs a lot better on a wrist watch than Linux anyways.

    pps- which VM? Hrm. well normally you can't pick one and end up with either the slow one or the one that crashes all the time. Sometimes you end up with one that does both, that's always fun too. If you didn't try running more than 1 process it wouldn't really matter anyways, so that's probably your fault. ;)

  149. Re:Helping the cause by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    My new motherboard only works with Windows XP. According to the sticker on it and the sales guy at Fry's. Apparently they keep getting them returned because people didn't realize that it wouldn't work with Win2k.

    So Windows will run the latest hardware, but it helps if you keep dropping $200 or whatever it is for a new version of windows everytime you upgrade.

    (yes. Linux, NetBSD and FreeBSD will run on it. didn't try OpenBSD).

    --
    I'm not some open source zealot, I hate Windows because it's a waste of my time.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  150. Bullocks. by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    I've got Mandrake 9.1 running beside Windows2K Pro on an NForce2 MB with a GeForce 4 ti 4400 graphics card. The onboard NIC doesn't work in Linux. The Buolt in sound is iffy. The Nvidia board is not accelerated. Under Windows the NIC works, the sound is fine and the video is accelerated. Out of the flipping box. No bullshit. No recompiling. No problem.

    As for games, there are more than will not run that there are that will. And not everyine is a fan of run and shoot games.

    Linux has come a LONG way since I first used it back in 1993. It's actually to a point where most people might have a chance of actually getting some use out of it. But be realistic. It's not ready for prime time yet. The hardware support is still lacking (but that's not really Linux' fault, that's just the way it is), the availability of games is still overly limited (again, not Linux's fault, but it is still true) and it's just not fiully baked yet.

    Linux may be fine FOR YOU, but it's not for everyone. Quake, UT, AA and Tux Racer may be all the games you need, but not everyone likes such a limited selection.

    You blind elitism is doing more to harm Linux than it is to help it.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Bullocks. by Tekzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This guy making more sense than most people on both sides of this arguement. You should read his last line and think hard on it. Foaming at the mouth Windows Disciples(tm) wear their ignorance like a badge of honor, but by reciprocating you make yourself look pretty silly too. I love Linux, and have a Linux box. Most of my machines run Windows because it does work for what I need, and when I want to play the latest shrinkwrapped game off the shelf or want to stick the latest piece of hardware in my box it works. Sure it has its flaws, most of them are directly to the company that makes it :) Linux has its flaws too, as well as its great strenghts. The absolute freedom to do what you want with the system is its biggest. My grandmother couldnt work with Linux though, but she could use Windows just fine. I can't believe I just supported Windows. Bleh. Also remember, competition is good. Repeat to yourself, competition is good. It absolutely drives innovation and refinement above anything else in our society.

    2. Re:Bullocks. by Tekzel · · Score: 1

      Bleh, it stripped out all of my paragraphs when I posted that. I hate it when posts amplify my natural ignorance :)

    3. Re:Bullocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hardware is not the only problem, It's also software. I am not just talking about games, I am also talking about software such as Graphics editing Software, The GIMP may be fine for some, but, Linux doesn't have any software similar to Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro.

      Also, there are no decent Sound Editing Programs out there for Linux similar to Goldwave. If Linux supported my Hardware & had better software support, I would move to Linux, but the way it looks now, the only real choise I have is Windows.

    4. Re:Bullocks. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      I've got Mandrake 9.1 running beside Windows2K Pro on an NForce2 MB with a GeForce 4 ti 4400 graphics card. The onboard NIC doesn't work in Linux. The Buolt in sound is iffy. The Nvidia board is not accelerated. Under Windows the NIC works, the sound is fine and the video is accelerated. Out of the flipping box. No bullshit. No recompiling. No problem.
      What Nic card is it? I bet it works fine. Did you actually even try to install the drivers from, uhh, www.nvidia.com? They use a common code base so all of the features that are there for MS windows are there for Linux. Maybe try to educate yourself on a topic before you spout out crap. I have installed MS windows hundreds of times and and tons of hardware that did not work until I installed a driver. It is no different for Linux. You can't gripe about having an non-accelerated NVidia card when NVidia puts out a great driver. They have a driver for their NForce stuff for Linux as well.
      Linux has come a LONG way since I first used it back in 1993. It's actually to a point where most people might have a chance of actually getting some use out of it. But be realistic. It's not ready for prime time yet.
      Whose prime time? Your prime time? I guess Oracle, IBM, HP, DELL, SAP, PeopleSoft and tons of other big players are just wasting their time and efforts? I do believe that an OS has far more capabilities then to just play a game. Go buy a PS2, GameCube, XBox, etc. if you want all the games.
      Linux may be fine FOR YOU, but it's not for everyone. Quake, UT, AA and Tux Racer may be all the games you need, but not everyone likes such a limited selection.
      Just as Linux may not be FOR YOU, don't try to speak for everyone. I am playing RTCW under Linux now and I get better framerates then under an ms windows OS. Here is a list of some games I see out for Linux natively or work perfectly with Wine:

      RTCW
      Ballistics
      Bandits: Phoenix Rising
      Candy Cruncher
      Creatures Internet Edition
      Disciples 2: Dark Prophecy
      Hyperspace Delivery Boy
      Majesty Gold
      Mindrover
      Mindrover Downloadable Update
      NingPo MahJong
      Soul Ride
      Max Payne
      Kohan - Immortal Sovereigns For Linux
      The Sims (Mandrake Gaming Edition)
      Hoyle Card Games 5
      Diablo 2
      Resident Evil 2
      Commandos Behind Enemy Lines
      Hoyle Casino 5
      Megaman X5
      Aces High
      Kohan - Ahriman's Gift
      Incubation
      Shadowman
      K Hawk: Survival Instinct
      Steel Panthers World At War
      Gunman Chronicles
      RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
      Blade Runner
      Die Siedler 4
      You Dont Know Jack Television
      Tropico 2 - Pirate Cove
      Jump Start Preschool
      3D Mark 2000
      Black and White
      Fallout 2
      Manx TT SuperBike
      The Last Express
      BlitzIn 2
      Crazy Marbles
      Warcraft III
      Sudden Strike Forever
      SimTower
      Mortal Kombat IV
      Moraff's Maximum Mahjongg V2
      Deep Space Nine: The Fallen
      Carmageddon 3
      Train Town
      There a hundreds more that work great in WineX with either a 5 or 4 out of 5 rating.
      You blind elitism is doing more to harm Linux than it is to help it.
      And your ignorance for Linux does more harm then good as well.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:Bullocks. by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      What you are describing points to Mandrake not being ready for prime time. I too have an Nforce2 board and under gentoo, my onboard nic and sound work just fine. The sound is a version of the Intel ICH audio controller and is supported by the vanilla linux kernel. Mandrake is not detecting it or setting things up properly. Alsa supports the nforce audio more completely than the kernel drivers. My GeForce3 is fully supported too and plays games very well.

      I can understand your frustration though, just point it in the proper direction and problems get solved much quicker. Many games now run fine in plain wine or winex. You could either pay for a winex subscription and get binary packages or compile the CVS version.

      Also keep in mind the simple truth that you are free to not run linux. It is not as easy to find support for new hardware or run the newest software on and I understand that. I choose to run linux and still choose to run WinXP. I've seen several people put much more effort into whining about how bad linux is than it would take to learn how to properly configure an installation.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  151. Our answer should be: by wilddur · · Score: 1

    Thank you very much. I'm going to another shop becouse you want me to pay for something I'm not going to use.

    We are clients. If a shop receives a pair of clients that refuse to buy a full PC becouse of their M$ policy they may start to think about it.

    This is the power of free market.

  152. Re:Helping the cause by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I like solitaire, sokobon, tetris, nethack, rogue, angband and moria. All run perfectly fine on teletype hobbists OSes.

    Neverwinter Nights runs on Linux and FreeBSD just fine. I play it almost every weekend.

    Notice I don't play it during the week because I am one of those types of people who has a job and does that instead of worring about what games my computer can play.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  153. Re:Helping the cause by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Neverwinter Nights runs on Linux and FreeBSD just fine. I play it almost every weekend."

    I'm glad you found a game you like.

    "Notice I don't play it during the week because I am one of those types of people who has a job and does that instead of worring about what games my computer can play. "

    I have a job and I play games in the evening.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  154. Compete? I call bullshit by spitzak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Microsoft does not compete. If things had happened slightly different than it did in 1980 then somebody else would be in Billy Gates' monopoly position, and Billy would be posting on Slashdot complaining about that monopoly's unfair practices. He could write Windows exactly like it is now and it would have ZERO impact on the market. Quality has absolutely zero to do with who is on top.

    You know this to be true. Everybody does. Any argument that Microsoft competed on the quality of their products is absolute bunk. Any quality is due to them hiring good people, but guess what, the alternative monopoly would have hired those same people!

  155. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knoppix already is debian. He can use debootstrap to install debian from the Knoppix cd.

  156. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Notice I don't play it during the week because I am one of those types of people who has a job and does that instead of worring about what games my computer can play.

    So, instead, at 10am on a weekday, you're posting on slashdot about what games you play?

  157. Re:Helping the cause by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ouch.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  158. Re:Next time you wanna make Linux CDs, call Malays by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 1


    So, next time if you wanna make CDs, or you have a rush job and still want to have high quality CDs made, give Malaysia a call.

    OK what is their phone number?

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  159. actually, bill *did* inherit! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    He inherited his empire from IBM. Aside from the incredible luck (read your history) of getting the original IBM contract, and his even more incredible luck at being left in the cat-bird seat when IBM's monopoly began to bust apart at the seams (which is really just an extension of that first piece of luck), Billy has shown no more than fair-to-middlin' business acumen.

    Oh, and he also inherited the wherewithal to start up a successful business from his parents. This is not a case of "successful hacker builds gigantic company from nothing", this is a case of "rich kid with all the right contacts leverages money and contacts into even more money."

    I don't think Billy can outsmart me with both hands tied behind his back -- certainly not in my area of expertise (software development). In business acumen, I'm sure he has me beat, because that's not my field, but can he outsmart your average businessman? I seriously doubt it. He didn't show any amazing ability to defeat his opponents until he already had that monopoly in place (thanks to IBM).

    Of course, underestimating the power of his monopoly, and or his ruthlessness (which is pretty fair-to-middlin' as far as business ruthlessness is concerned, but is backed by that good ol' monopoly) is a pretty quick road to disaster, but lets not give him more credit than he actually deserves. Down that road lies fear and paralysis, which is just as sure a route to defeat.

  160. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    RTFM ya lame newbie!

    Just helping to ease your transition :D

  161. Try any advanced cordless mouse.... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    .. you can have the standard mouse features with the windows driver, or some of the advanced features, but not all of them, with the manufacturers drivers. Some Choice.
    This is with a Logitech cordless mx700, under Win2k or XP.
    It works perfectly well with Win98, which, as soon as I get my drives backed up, I'll be reinstalling.
    I like windows and dos, but not the restrictive new flavors.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  162. History by Pac · · Score: 1

    While I do not deny that Gates and Allen were very lucky to get the original IBM contract, they had to be very smart to beat the competition in the GUI arena during Windows early years. They had some luck there (when Apple, for instance, refused to port their OS to the Intel platform, a move that would probably have left us with Apple at the top). Before v 3.1, Windows could barely run two instances of its own clock at the same time and there were worthy players (GEM, for instance, or the text-based DeskView).

    In the development area, Borland and Watcom were the two companies developers cared about. While Visual Basic was an instant hit, its original crippled enviroment couldn't be used for serious development. With Visual C++ Microsoft managed to turn the wind around once again.

    As for being "a rich kid with contacts", there are those everywhere. It garantees nothing past the first couple of opportunies. People will see you because they know your Dad, but they will only keep turning to you if you can prove you are good.

    But, please, don't misundertand me. I am no BillG fan, I just think one can't really dismiss his intelligence just because one does not like how he uses it (as the original poster did).

    1. Re:History by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd argue that the success of Win3.1 and later had more to do with leveraging their monopoly than anything else (even luck). It's easy to forget (now that the world has been converted to the religion of GUIs) just how successful MS-DOS was in its day. And their lack of success with earlier versions of Win (not to mention such memorable "innovations" as Bob) just shows that there's some things that are so bad that even a monopoly can't apply enough leverage to get them moving. :)

      In the development arena, MS was always the company to beat. Borland made a suprisingly good showing for a little while, but Watcom's great press and excellent reviews never really turned into major sales. And MS's compilers got a lot of public sneers during Borland's heyday, but still got an awful lot of quiet, day-to-day use.

      Anyway, I guess those are quibbles, because I don't really disagree with your main point: BG is clearly a very competent businessman, and it is dangerous to underestimate him. I just see more people (in ordinary life, not here on /.) who overestimate him than underestimate him, so I just had to interject my usual arguments.

      cheers

  163. For everyone else: His mobile number +6421 626 361 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +6421 626 361 or 006421 626 361,

  164. Has anyone phoned or SMS'ed these guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you phoned or SMS'ed, let us know.

  165. Re:Helping the cause by AtariKee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not trolling by saying this, but MAME has all the games I'd ever want to play :)

    --
    "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
    "Thank you, Master Control"
    -Sark and the MCP
  166. it's still strictly formal by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    All you have to do is profess a belief in a "higher power." Many people get away without even doing this, but if you make a point of refusing to profess that belief, they may kick you out. Other than that, they don't actually go around trying to make sure you really do believe in God.

    It's still kind of a silly rule, but it's promoted by some conservative elements within the organization who feel that being religious is a necessary component of being a good person.

  167. Re:Helping the cause by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "I'm not trolling by saying this, but MAME has all the games I'd ever want to play :)"

    I don't think he had you in mind. I think he's referring to the gamer who wants new games every so often. I fit into that category, and I think Linux would be a ridiculous OS to have for that. The main reason being that Windows not only gets the good stuff, but it also gets the stuff a lot sooner than Linux does.

    Instead of getting a system and waiting for stuff to trickle down to me, I found the games I want and picked the system that plays those. So I have a Windows PC and a GameCube. Linux might be on the radar if it didn't get hand-me-downs. ;)

    On the other hand, there are people who find games to be a secondary priority. Linux is probably fine for them. Heck MAME alone (like you said) should be good for them. I do agree with NG, though, that people who are reserved about switching to Linux because of games are going to be disappointed.

  168. Re:Helping the cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you'd stated the opposite, you'd be accused of being a troll and astroturfer. Funny how things work, innit?

    I'll try the opposite.

    One problem... where can I download a version of Windows that runs off a CD so I can see what all the fuss is about?

  169. Re:In this case bad publicity is good ..for sure! by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    ".. the only time M$ wouldn't piss all over you is if you were on fire."

    Only if you work for MS?

    Or maybe.... they will piss all over you if you are a competitor or a hardware partner that tries to innovate without MS approval and a lions share piece of the action!

    Firewire, usb (which they got anyway with enough money grease), fixed ram chip based hard drives on a pci or ide slot, the original windowing software that they couldn't clone fast enough but could buy for a pittance, the good ideas that are open source like a spread sheet, and proprietary win modems, printers, chips, etc,etc,etc........the system utilities they tried to clone, compression software they needed virgins to write, etc,etc.... The very PC itself with the aid of Compact.

    MS is a corporate/intellectual property side stepping or financial raiding organisation, not a software firm. History will be blinded to the truth because everybody loves a winner. There is no way the moral high-ground of Linux and Gnu can stop them, because of their rediculous wealth and American Government/lobby connected control. So give in, learn to love MS and your PC. Millions swear it is the greatest thing since sliced bannock, and will defend MS to the end.

    How to stop worrying and love the PC, someone should write it!

    Quit trying to find a reason to believe. Linux for business is a dead starter, and Bsd has already been buried. Businesses have been blind-sided and cannot get away from the MS office/windows addiction/costs even if they try.

    Most simple minded MS word users crindge at the thought of learning anything new and think that MS office is God come to them on their office PC.

    They are taught to think that in private business sponsored MS, IT schools. Here in British Columbia you cannot even find a College that teaches anything other than MS approved office software training!

    Linux install fests are no threat to Goliath, David with a little rock in the right place, was a different matter.

    What Linux needs is a killer PC that it runs instantly without a frigging DRIVE C TO BOOT FROM.
    Cheap RAM CHIP based hard drives could have done exactly this. The manipulation of the hardware, bios chip and ram market by Goliath is the real crime! Get your heads out of the sand, NewZealanders ....Oh sorry you guys are EMU/wine freaks not Ostriches.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  170. Re:Helping the cause by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

    The Typing Of The Dead, Worms Armageddon, Diablo 2.... These are not Linux native, but you might be able to get them to work on an emulator.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  171. MOD PARENT UP!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a very important point - Linux is seen by many outside the US as the only potential alternative to American domination of a strategic technology area.

  172. Not quite what I got... by iamatlas · · Score: 1

    [~]% telnet linuxforums.co.nz 80
    Trying 202.49.94.189...
    Connected to server.02net.co.nz.
    Escape character is '^]'


  173. EMAIL the CEO by oob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To: chris.due@softwareimages.com
    Cc: logan.jay@softwareimages.com, cristian.giurgiu@softwareimages.com,
    rudy.clavel@softwareimages.com
    Subject: Refusal of Linux CD Order

    Dear Chris,

    I have just read with dismay the Slashdot and NZ Herald stories regarding your refusal to copy CD images of the Linux operating system for use at an
    upcoming Linux Installfest to be held in New Zealand.

    I understand that this refusal is due to a deal that your organisation has with Microsoft Corporation, your unfounded protestations of copyright infringement concerning Linux not withstanding.

    I believe that you are fully within your rights to make such a deal, sordid though I believe it to be, and to refuse work orders from your customers as you see fit.

    Like many others however, I dislike your decision and chose not to use your services or buy your products until such time as your decision is reversed and you make adequate restitution to the Open Source community.

    Further, I am in the process of contacting every person I can think of who might be in a position to do business with you to explain my decision, in the hope that they also may chose to do business with one of your competitors.

    I hope that the loss of business that results, along with the terrible press you have been getting encourages you to rethink your decision.

    Please withold any platitudes regarding the SCO Group suit against IBM, they are neither relevant to your decision or in themselves have any basis in fact.

    Regards,

  174. Re:My few cents. (Trolling) by mchappee · · Score: 1

    Hi Bill. Missed you at the meeting today. Nice interview in USA Today, you really let Ol' Big Blue have it! Weird, I've never seen you post to Slashdot before. That was great! :-) This is exactly what Jim was talking to Balmer about, before, well, you know.

    Poor Steve. He really thought it was gas. :-( The cleaning crew was *still there* when I left for lunch. I heard the pants were a total loss. Anyway, don't let the "Open Sores" :-) thing get to you. You should see some of the things coming out of R&D! The next version of "NT" is *SO* integrated that the whole thing loads up in a single Visual Basic project. And the beauty part is that we used a Mac OS X box to do it! They ship with a CCT (Code Convergence Tool) called /bin/cat that allowed us to combine all of the source files into One Big .bas file. It was so cool. It went something like: /bin/cat kernel32.bas hal.bas comctl.bas ie6.bas palladium.bas cia_code.bas > nt_2004.bas

    Hehe, we'll have to "license" the code to that tool. :-) Well, I have to get back to work. Steve'll be back any minute. He's started keeping a change in his car 'cause he was sick of driving all the way home every time. Talk at ya later.

    Marcus Ellington
    Director of Software "Acquisitions"
    Microsoft

    PS, maybe we should remove the quotes around "Acquisitions" in my title. Seems a little blatant...

    --
    /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
  175. Re:Helping the cause by Trepalium · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does the Neverwinter Nights expansion pack -- Shadows of Undrentide work on Linux or FreeBSD (e.g. is 1.30 patch available yet).

    --
    I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  176. The same could be said of Windows by Mongoose · · Score: 1

    A lot of the programs in windows aren't owned in whole by Microsoft. Several of the utilities for example are not made inhouse, and the IP doesn't belong to Microsoft to do as it will.

    It doesn't mean anything. Here's horrible analogy: If you had to prove everything in your car at any moment is in fact yours, then I bet you'd be in trouble -- no recipts for your laptop, bag, and your old tennis shoes? Our these pictures yours in your wallet - your not in them! ;)

    When every cd printing house requires such detailed proof they'd go out of bussiness fast.

  177. Re:Helping the cause by thirdrock · · Score: 1

    I play Quake, Unreal Tournament, America's Army, etc. on Linux. Can't think of any better games that I'd want to play on Linux -- nor any that I can't.

    When I can play 'Shogun: Total War' under Linux, that Winders partition is GONE DADDY GONE.

    --
    >>
    I am the director, and this is my movie ...
  178. Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory rocks in Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I challenge you to name a better game!

  179. How not to help by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

    It has been a diffcult time recently, with various recent Linux issues creating problems for us in the NZOSS from a public relations point of view. Our concern when reporting the issue we had with Software Images to the NZ Herald was that the problem of exclusivity agreements could become widespread, and that this would restrict our ability to compete.

    However, as a result of this story Software Images has received threats and abusive email to such an extent that they will probably report this to the NZ Police. And to be clear, I support this 100%. I and the society have been professional and polite in our dealings with Software Images, and the same is true in return.

    It is simply not acceptable for people to be making threats to companies and their employees. I am deeply upset that people would take it on themselves to write abusive and threatening emails, and abuse people by phone.

    Its not a good look for open source in New Zealand, but more importantly its JUST WRONG! These abusive emails were not appreciated by the NZOSS.

    To be clear I am not refering to people who communicate respectfully and intelligently about the issues. Being passionate about open source is good. However, the abuse I am talking about stepped way over the line.

    Regards,

    Peter Harrison
    NZOSS

  180. Moderation really sucks here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we punished for replying, thoughtfully, to an existing article? If you are not happy with the topic, mod down the parent. If any meta-moderators are reading this, I hope you get on the case. Thanks!

  181. Can't handle a little competition? by wizrd_nml · · Score: 1

    Let me start by saying that I've got Linux in my blood. I only use Windows at work, cuz I have to.

    But I completely agree with the Pepsi/Coke argument. If you were a company making your living by selling/servicing Microsoft products, would you jeapordise that for a measly order to copy 500 CD's?

    Business relationships are built on much more than just contractual agreements.

    How would you like it if RedHat started selling Windows XP on its website?

    As a Linux community we've always approached Linux with passion. For everyone else trying to make a living it's about numbers and Linux numbers don't add up.

  182. Re:Helping the cause by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Yes. Most of the servers require 1.30 right now. You can run 1.30 with the original data (no expansion) or with the new data packs (expansion pack).

    ps- go on "Realm of the Dead"/Heaven vs. Hell and maybe I'll see you.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  183. Linux in Thailand by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    MS just hikacked tens of thousands of computers to be sold by the Thai government with Linux pre-installed by offering Windows to purchasers for 250 Baht (about US$6). There were supposed to be a hundred thousand Linux computers by December, and now there will be, like zero. Check my journal for the details.
    I found the article which you linked to, but it is in Thai. Can you point to a published English version?
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:Linux in Thailand by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Basically, my journal is a translation (summary, in this case) of Thai Linux info. I don't know of any English sources, or I would give one, gladly.

  184. I stand corrected. by LazloToth · · Score: 1


    http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/os/story/0,200004 8630,20274933,00.htm

    Yep, I'd missed this detail - - apologies to Boies, et.al. Doesn't change my opinion of Boies' involvement - - just means he'd like an even bigger take if SCO's bullsh*t case pans out.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  185. Hmm by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    Do they have a contract with MS, or a retainer?

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.