Slashdot Mirror


Gentoo 1.4 Final Released

markds writes "After a long wait, the Gentoo team has finally released the latest version of their distribution. Gentoo Linux 1.4 is now available. 1.4 includes automated kernel builds, CFLAGS generation, the Gentoo Reference Platform, and support for netless installation." And Beost writes "It looks like our favorite disto gentoo has released two of the new v1.4 LiveCDs. Enjoy!" Reader Luke-Jr points to the list of official mirrors and "unofficial (though created by developers) BitTorrents." (Of course, you can also buy CD sets for a variety of architectures from the Gentoo store.)

398 comments

  1. Great release by dook43 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm glad that my favorite distribution has finally gone retail. I will definitely be among the people that shell out $15 for the two pressed CDs and the printed installation manual.

    Been using Gentoo for my linux boxes since late 2001; I couldn't be happier.

    --
    This comment was randomly generated by a school of piranhas chewing on the PCB of a Microsoft Natural Keyboard.
    1. Re:Great release by GeckoFood · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...$15 for the two pressed CDs...

      Don't forget SCO's $699 licensing fee... ;-)

      --
      Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    2. Re:Great release by natmsincome.com · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      What I don't get is how they get off charging for a single CPU license when they say the code that was taken was only for SMP?

    3. Re:Great release by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that would actually be $1398.

      I'm sure there is a byte or two of infringing code on each CD.

      (p.s. yes, i know it's a per CPU fee.)

    4. Re:Great release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I will definitely be among the people that shell out $15 for the two pressed CDs and the printed installation manual.

      Soooo, Gentoo stands to make $30 out of the deal then? Oh wait, I'm not planning to buy one...

    5. Re:Great release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For mission critial stuff, I still do not suggest Gentoo. As as example I point to forums.gentoo.org. Which was moved over to Debian just 2 days ago due to security and other issues mission critical issues that infest gentoo.

      But for the hobby person or linux guru thinking of testing out a new disto, give gentoo a try, but i suggest doing this on a free (fast) harddisk (hopefully one where you have no critical paritions).

    6. Re:Great release by dpilot · · Score: 1

      But SCO is only licensing binaries, so it's just not possible to get a regular Gentoo release into compliance, only the bootstrap binaries.

      That's the real fallacy of SCO licensing. How many of those systems are running stock kernels.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    7. Re:Great release by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      www.gentoo.org So why is the rest of the site still running Gentoo then?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    8. Re:Great release by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Gentoo is a great idea, and I'm in no doubt that it's nery cool to compile everything on your computer before you can get productive with it.

      As I'm no longer in IT I don't need to maintain a massive network any more, but my modest home network of 3 computers of various architectures would have been very tedious to get into a useable state with Gentoo.

      My preference is to keep it simple: install Slackware and just recompile the applications (and the kernel, of course) that will actually accrue some performance benefit.

    9. Re:Great release by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      As I'm no longer in IT I don't need to maintain a massive network any more, but my modest home network of 3 computers of various architectures would have been very tedious to get into a useable state with Gentoo.

      Actually, it's not that tedious. Once you come up with the list of applications you want to install, it's a single command (albeit a long one). I've found that most of what I want will be installed by installing a PHP application and Mozilla -- the former will build all the web-related dependencies and the latter will build all the X-related dependencies.

      Since you have various architectures, you can't build once and install the resulting package on all of your systems (unless you will settle for the lowest common denominator like i386), but the Portage system does allow you to retain the packages for use later or elsewhere.

    10. Re:Great release by rjch · · Score: 1
      Don't forget SCO's $699 licensing fee... ;-)
      I won't. (says he setting fire to a cheque for AU$1075 and putting the ashes into an envelope)
  2. I don't mean to whore....but.... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For 80% of the responses Most people that read this article will say to themselves "Gen-what? Big deal, my *insert distro here* has already done all of that!" or "Wow, so some Linux distro does a few things that *insert Mac or Windows version* has been doing for months, or even years".

    Just keep in mind this much: Whether you are a Red Hat user, a Mandrake enthusiast, or a Slackware zealot, we have all "been there". And like it or not, distros like Gentoo and Debian keep hope alive and stay true to the Linux and open source "roots".

    No, I am not a Debian or Gentoo user. In fact I am a Red Hat and Windows 98 user. I recognize valiant efforts and righteous grass roots development movements when I see them, however, and I pay my respect and homage to them.

    So, despite how bad this post may come off as a karma whore (and you all know that I love to write karma whores), just keep in mind that it is people like the Gentoo team that have made Linux the phenomenon that it is. OK, feel free to mod me down now.

    1. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. Its a shame posts like these need to be one of
      the first 6 because we know gentoo zealotry is
      getting out of hand and spoiling the reputation
      for many of the users.
      I can download my distro for free, or apt-rpm
      dist-upgrade too okay?

    2. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Artifex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're not whoring. The reasons why I went ahead and bought the CD set when it came up, even though I'd already downloaded the ISO, were a) I was lazy b) I needed to know the CDs weren't going to fail on me like a copied ISO might, and c), the biggest reason of all, I want to support Gentoo.

      My primary experience with Linux in the home has been SuSE, and I know I'm going to find Gentoo painful to start up and might even go back to SuSE at this stage in the game. But Gentoo seems to be about much more than Linux: from what I understand, they're working on platforms for other OSes out there, and that greatly increases the probability that many more people will benefit from their work on Portage and the rest.

      Oh, and just in case someone thinks I'm karma whoring, myself (like I should care?), let me say that I also broke down and ordered an OEM version of Windows XP Pro yesterday, along with a requisite piece of hardware to meet the licensing terms, etc.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "My primary experience with Linux in the home has been SuSE, and I know I'm going to find Gentoo painful to start up and might even go back to SuSE at this stage in the game."

      Don't say that just yet. I was in the same boat but after following the directions and asking the friendly folks on the gentoo-user mailing list and forums.gentoo.org, I easily found everything I needed, and life is good. :)

    4. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by bogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "just keep in mind that it is people like the Gentoo team that have made Linux the phenomenon that it is"

      Err not really. Gentoo came along way way after linux became a "phenomenon". Its also very much a minority distro. If you want to thank someone, thank Slackware, Red Hat, and Debian who have been giving and giving for years now.

      Nothing against Gentoo, but let's give credit where credit it due. It's going to be a long time before Gentoo can be lumped in with the above distros.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    5. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      No, its commercial distributors like Red Hat and SuSE, and also hardware companies like IBM and Intel, that have made 'Linux' what it is today. By funding development, contributing technology, providing professional support, and developing products installable by end users. These things help expand users of Linux beyond the small base of geeks who have been using it for the last ten years.

      Gentoo is none of these things. The installer is a step backward from, say, Slackware from 10 years ago, in that there really isn't one. The package system, aside from the fact that it builds from source by default (which has now been proven to be of no meaningful benefit to most users), is like Debian's, but the quality control process is basically non-existent in favor of a philosophy of throwing up immediately every new release regardless of whether it is broken or not. Its a distro aimed at the typical slashdot user, with no hope of ever being useful to anyone else. Even developers are more likely to use a professional distribution such as Red Hat, since they are the standard platform their software should run on. And no self-respecting corporation would install an unmaintainable distribution consisting mostly of beta and untested software that 24+ hours of dedicated, hands-on attention to install on typical hardware. If the efforts of Gentoo developers were put towards improving an existing non-commercial distributions such as Debian, or improving the open source programs themselves, it would clearly be advancing the cause of Linux -- instead they are duplicating existing work and stepping backward in time, producing a product that almost no one wants, and no one at all needs, and this doesn't help linux at all.

    6. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Actually, it appear that there are more Gentoo users than Debian users at the moment, and Gentoo is the fastest growing distro. It's hardly a "minority" distro.

    7. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      notice how he said "people like". It's the hacker spirit that gentoo seems to embrace that has made linux what it is.

    8. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of credit, shouldn't you be giving some to SuSE??

    9. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Artifex · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't say that just yet. I was in the same boat but after following the directions and asking the friendly folks on the gentoo-user mailing list and forums.gentoo.org, I easily found everything I needed, and life is good. :)


      Well... I chose SuSE because of its very nice KDE and office-type applications integration, and YaST2(3,4, whatever they have now). In other words, it's pretty, I can be productive right away on it, and all that. Same reason why I have licensed MS-Windows versions, too, of course. I'd like to play around with Gentoo Linux because of the speed appeal and the almost-rolling-my-own, but it's going to take a while to get it going.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    10. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What's a long time in computer terms?

      Face it, we have Intel and AMD on the cusp of major architecture changes AND the migration to the 64 bit processor. Both changes require a complete recompile of your system to exploit the improvements.

      At the same time, you have a distro that for the first time brings parity between the x86, PPC, and sparc architectures. Plans are even in the works to port portage to Cygwin, BSD, and MacOSX. The GCC compiler is getting good enough at building across architectures that a new hardware platform could have a Linux port in weeks.

      Computing power and RAM are plentiful in PC's. People bicker about 19 hours to compile OpenOffice, but I can remember a time when (assuming it was possible at all) a compile like that would take weeks.

      All of these factors are pointing us to a world in the near future where binaries are an afterthought. Even if the hardware you are running on can't compile on the fly, you can plug it into a server farm that CAN.

      Gentoo may be a half-assed Linux distro. But it has the potential to completely change how we distribute software.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    11. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My primary experience with Linux in the home has been SuSE, and I know I'm going to find Gentoo painful to start up and might even go back to SuSE at this stage in the game." Nah.. I didn't have any problems getting into Gentoo, and I had no prior Linux/Unix/non-Windows/etc experience at all.

    12. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 4, Informative
      I needed to know the CDs weren't going to fail on me like a copied ISO might.

      Odd. The only times I've ever had CDs burned from ISOs fail is when the burner failed to burn the disc properly.

      There is, of course, a simple way to check that it did burn properly. Assuming you burned it as MODE1 with one data track and no additional postgaps you can do this:

      dd if=/dev/cdrom bs=2048 | md5sum

      Then compare that with the md5sum of the ISO. If you added a postgap, then specify the number of 2048 byte blocks that make up the ISO with count=XYZ

      Another method is to use find and md5sum redirected to a text file, something like:

      cd /mnt/loopbacked_iso
      find . -type f -exec md5sum {} \; > ~/known_good_md5
      cd /mnt/cdrom
      find . -type f -exec md5sum {} \; > ~/cdrom_md5
      diff -u ~/known_good_md5 ~/cdrom_md5

      That works a bit better in cases wher you have intentionally added/deleted/modified files and want to make sure nothing else got changed. Note that you may or may not need to pass that through sort; I'll leave that as an excercise for the reader.

    13. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Kevin+DeGraaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I needed to know the CDs weren't going to fail on me like a copied ISO might

      Uhm... you do know about md5sum, don't you?

      --
      We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked.
    14. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      That should be in the Gentoo FAQ. MHO, but it really should be.

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    15. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Ig0r · · Score: 5, Informative

      "...a distro that for the first time brings parity between the x86, PPC, and sparc architectures."

      Debian has had a synchronous stable version for Alpha, ARM, Intel x86, Motorola 680x0, PowerPC, and SPARC since mid 2000.
      Most recent stable release supports 11 architectures.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    16. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You have had ISO copies "fail"? Is that because you are a complete and utter useless twat when it comes to downloading the iso's, or because you are a complete and utter useless twat when it comes to burning them onto CD?
      Because, holy fuck man. I have _N E V E R_ had that problem.

    17. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by arkane1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They said "people like the Gentoo team".
      Not the Gentoo team, themselves.
      They're right, it was people who wanted to better Linux, make it more configurable and give the user more options.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    18. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by pyr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget mips!! Gentoo runs on mips as well. Current supported machines are SGI Indy, SGI Indigo2 (R4k), and SGI O2 (R5K). I've got an R5K Indy with gentoo mips, and it works great. Distcc and fast machines with cross-compilers make it really fast and easy too.

    19. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

      It's people like the Gentoo team that have made Linux the phenomenon that it is.

      That is to say, it's not the Gentoo team, but people with similar attitudes and motivations. The Gentoo team are continuing on the same traditions.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    20. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by jfb3 · · Score: 1

      He said people "like" the Gentoo team made linux what it is, he didn't say "the Gentoo team" made linux what it is. Geesh.

      Unless of course english is not your first language in which case, nevermind...

    21. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by diamondc · · Score: 1

      uh yeah.. how did you come to this scientific conclusion Mr. Anonymous Coward?

      --
      "I keep looking in the want-ads under 'revolutionary' but there don't seem to be any listings.. "
    22. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Xabraxas · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The package system, aside from the fact that it builds from source by default (which has now been proven to be of no meaningful benefit to most users)

      That's not entirely true. Building from source gives you control of what support you want to add. The USE variables are the upside to this method.

      And no self-respecting corporation would install an unmaintainable distribution consisting mostly of beta and untested software that 24+ hours of dedicated, hands-on attention to install on typical hardware.

      Actually there is an unstable branch to Gentoo for beta and untested software. I use Gentoo stable and never had a single problem with it. Most "self-respecting" corporations that do use Gentoo tend to have a seperate build machine where they can build binaries and emerge them on the other machines.

      If the efforts of Gentoo developers were put towards improving an existing non-commercial distributions such as Debian, or improving the open source programs themselves, it would clearly be advancing the cause of Linux -- instead they are duplicating existing work and stepping backward in time, producing a product that almost no one wants, and no one at all needs, and this doesn't help linux at all.

      This is just garbage. Gentoo is not Debian. Gentoo is after a different market. It is about fine-grained control, it's not just a non-commercial distro with good package management. Those two things just happen to be an added benefit. The control Gentoo offers is powerful yet simple. That's what people like. To say that Gentoo is something that nobody needs or wants is very naive. It is positively something people want since it is growing rapidly. I would hope it is something people need, since it was created to fill a need.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    23. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      "it is people like the Gentoo team that have made Linux the phenomenon that it is"

      I think the original poster meant that it's people who are trying new approaches that helped Linux; not that it's the Gentoo team itself that has caused the phenomenon.

    24. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a RedHat and Windows 3.11 user

    25. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by scsi_pants · · Score: 1

      As someone who switched from Mandrake to Gentoo about a year ago, let me share something from my experiance:
      The only other box I have around the house is an old 486. I didn't want to use this for the 3 or 4 days my box was compiling the gentoo stuff, so I did the vast majority of the compiling from a chroot inside my 'drake install. This may be a bit slower (overhead of xmms, mozilla, etc running while i'm using the box) but it allowed me to continue to use my box.
      Might not be the best for your situation, but if you've got a limited number of boxes it's a nice option to have.

    26. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by jankinz · · Score: 1
      "Err not really... If you want to thank someone, thank Slackware, Red Hat, and Debian who have been giving and giving for years now."

      i believe he/she said "people LIKE the gentoo team." in actuality, you misunderstood or misread the previous post. read: people who innovate and work hard to produce in the name of open development and open standards. in my mind this includes the slack, red hat and debian team members as well as a host of others.

      if you think about it, linux is a minority OS, so faulting gentoo for being a minority distro is tantamount to saying linux is insignificant because more people use windows.

    27. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps he looked at Distrowatch?

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    28. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by innosent · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't have any problems getting into Gentoo, and [...]

      I agree. While Gentoo is certainly not the easiest distribution to install, the install guide documentation is quite good, and even inexperienced Linux users won't have much problem installing it. Even starting from stage1 (where you have to build everything), the most difficult part for inexperienced users is compiling the kernel, but if you can handle a kernel compile, you'll have no problem with Gentoo.

      Once you're used to the system, you'll appreciate the fact that announcements like this release don't matter, since you're only two commands away from the latest versions of all packages on your system ("emerge sync" to update the ebuild [packages] list, and "emerge -u --deep world" [--deep gets all dependencies, not really necessary] to update every package on your system, except the kernel).
      It may seem like it would be difficult to install an entire system from source, but it's really quite easy, just pay attention to the USE flags, and be patient, because it will take a while to compile everything. One more tip, there are a few packages (OpenOffice.org especially), where a binary version is available, and this will save a ton of time if you don't care that it's 100% optimized for your system, and/or don't feel like spending longer to install an office suite than it took to compile Gnome and KDE combined.
      So try it, it may be exactly what you want in a distribution, and if it isn't, at least you know it isn't. As an added bonus, you'll probably learn something new about Linux.

      --
      --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    29. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately the parent poster here clearly doesn't understand the danger inherent in assuming a CD-R is good if it simply reads correctly.

      When you burn a MODE-1 ISO-9660 data CD-R, it's not simply writing your data out directly to the disc -- it's being encoded through no less than three sequential error detection and correction systems. Audio discs and discs that use MODE-2 without ISO-9660 error correction still go through the two sequential error correction and detection encodings inherent in the CD design.

      The actual data on the disc is always riddled with errors -- the pits/lands (or in the case of a CD-R, the stained areas of dye) are simply too tiny and numerous to not have them obscured or distorted by microscopic scratches, bits of dust, tiny bad patches of dye, cosmic rays, etc. When you read a CD your CD-ROM drive is constantly correcting errors on its base level (C1), and if there is even a tiny visible scratch on the disc it's probably having to rely on its secondary error correction system (C2) to read the disc properly.

      In normal operation your drive doesn't even TELL you about these errors -- the only way to know about them is to use special equipment or use a few special brands of drives that support reporting this information (C2 errors are reported by a number of drives, but C1 errors are only reported by a few drives (Plextor Premium, and recent Lite-On drives come to mind) and not in a standard way).

      ISO-9660 MODE 1 (and MODE 2 with correction) adds a third layer of error correction to protect your data if all else fails, that's why a somewhat scratched disc still works.

      What I'm trying to say here is that simply comparing the md5 sum of your cooked (i.e. ISO-9660 error corrected) data track is not a way to judge the quality of a burn. Your disc might read fine today but die tomorrow.

      dd doesn't know the difference between a well burned disc with only a few C1 errors and no C2 errors, versus a badly mismanufactured disc that might've been exposed to the sun at some point that is riddled with errors that only your ISO-9660 third-level error correction is managing to fix. The first disc will probably last quite a while, while the second disc is already on its last legs and will probably not be readable in a month.

      Analyzing these "hidden" errors is key to getting a good burn and making trusted archival copies.

      (Unfortunately it seems that CD-Rs are nowhere near as durable as they are supposed to be. Many cheap brands of discs burned only 6-7 years ago are becoming unreadable now! So far my Metal Azo Verbatim Datalife Plus discs are holding on like troopers though -- knock on wood -- but even on those I can see C1 error counts creeping up over time).

    30. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that is very informative. I had no idea all that went on in a simple CD-ROM drive.

    31. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by reddish · · Score: 1

      'A recent stable Debian release', uhm.... Continents have been known to drift several miles in between stable Debian releases.

      I'm a big Debian fan though. Unstable and testing are really quite useable these days.

    32. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by mijok · · Score: 1

      ...but it's going to take a while to get it going.
      Don't worry. I used to run Debian but switched to Gentoo and installing it was very, very, convenient (and the instructions are good). If you already have a partition, on which you'll install it, just chroot to that and let Gentoo compile in the background whilst you use your SuSE installation until Gentoo is complete - which, if you compile X, KDE and so on will take 24+ hours unless you have an extremely fast computer, mine is a P3 450MHz and a complete compile to a desktop from scratch took almost 36 hours. So in the end, installing gentoo on a different partition whilst using a another Linux installation in the mean time was the most convenient (although configuration-wise not the easiest) Linux-installation I've ever done and the result was an OS I could boot into straight away and still compiled specifically for my system :) After using Debian I was impressed by the speed increase with Gentoo 1.2 and I'm looking forward to an even bigger speed increase with 1.4 since I'll be compiling it with pre-linking - instructions can be found here, if you want to try that straight away (and thus avoid a new compilation from scratch later). Happy compiling!

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    33. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      If the efforts of Gentoo developers were put towards improving an existing non-commercial distributions such as Debian, or improving the open source programs themselves, it would clearly be advancing the cause of Linux -- instead they are duplicating existing work and stepping backward in time, producing a product that almost no one wants, and no one at all needs, and this doesn't help linux at all.

      Just as the users who want a stable system with prebuilt packages where the maintainer decides the dependencies are served by Debian, Gentoo serves those who want to make those decisions themselves. If Linux and open source in general is about anything, it's choice.

      Besides, perhaps a few of the ideas that Gentoo experiments with will make it back into Debian making it an even better distro than it already is.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    34. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Firstly let me say that whomever modded this shit up needs to have their mod privledges revoked.

      secondly let me point out a few things, one you misread the parent. he said "like" the gentoo team, not just them. secondly gentoo did not come along "way after" linux became a phenom. linux got "hot" in late 99, and didnt really get ANY market share until mid-late 00. gentoo came along in 2001 a whopping year later. Also gentoo is not a minority distro its on of the top 4; and its the fastest growing distro by two fold.

      i am not a zealot for any distro, cause i can do what i want with all of them. i however do use gentoo on all of my non-production servers, and all of my workstations.

      and just out of pure curiosity what exactly do the above distros offer that you dont get with gentoo ?

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    35. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both changes require a complete recompile of your system to exploit the improvements.

      I'm perfectly happy to let my distro maker do that for me. What advantage do I have if I recompile my own packages? I'm more likely to introduce conflicts and get compilation flags wrong than someone who has done this thousands of times before and has a testing team in place to check it all before I use it.

      Face it, compilation is a one-time problem, and it doesn't matter wether that compilation is done pre or post consumer. emerge is just a gimick.

    36. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I chose SuSE

      I've been partial to SuSE, too, mainly because of the huge 7 CD releases that include all kinds of lesser known packages that are convenient to have around, especially living beyond the reach of DSL and cable modem broadband connections. If there's something you need, downloading lots of MBs takes too long.

      Gentoo advertises something like 4000 packages.

      Is a fully loaded Gentoo distribution comparable to SuSE in that regard?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    37. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Which only gauges interest, and frankly, when I was a Gentoo user for that brief period of time last year (coming from BSD at the time), it seemed like DistroWatch was pushed a lot on the Gentoo forums. So, it really doesn't surprise me that Gentoo has a lot of hits there.

      I'm not aware of any good way to measure Linux distribution use.

    38. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      From your link:

      It follows that those distribution added to DistroWatch recently would generate high average hit count - simply because they weren't around during the low-traffic times. United Linux and other recent additions will simply have to wait a few months until I have a more representative data set to get into the tables.

      If this is too be believed, Gentoo figures are likely inflated due to the increasing traffic at distrowatch.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    39. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Perhaps the stable version of debian takes so much time to get out because synchronizing all these platforms takes time (especially as most of the new linux developpers these days are working on x86 machines exclusively).

    40. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by luisdom · · Score: 1

      All of these factors are pointing us to a world in the near future where binaries are an afterthought. Even if the hardware you are running on can't compile on the fly, you can plug it into a server farm that CAN.
      Or a server farm that has everything pre-compiled with most common combinations, now that HD space is plentiful in PC's... oh, wait...

      Seriously, I really don't believe in Gentoo's system of compiling everithing, when 80% or more of the people is compiling with the same options... that is, wasting time doing something that a lot of people has already done. Mantaining a good-comprehensive set of compiled packages it's a better idea, for me. And (please, correct me if I'm wrong, I'm a mdkr) that is what debian is doing...

    41. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I just happend to be in that 20%. Just because you don't need it, doesn't mean its crap. By that logic we all should have been happy with Windows 98.

      My problem is that I need to maintain a pile of servers. Compile time isn't the issue, they are dual 1Ghz machines with boatloads of RAM. I found under RedHat I was downloading and compiling most of my major packages anyway because I needed a newer version than was available. And I just don't trust outside binaries. They have bitten me in the ass on a lot of occasions.

      Now in a production environment, once I build a box, it stays built. I only fix the parts that need patching because of security vulnerabilities. In my case Gentoo is a perfect fit.

      At home I like to play DVD's, dump video from my camcorder, and use my playstation through the frame grabber on my quasi-supported video card. While binaries do exist that let me do that I've found them brittle and buggy. I'm pulling off a new package to do this and that every week. I find the source approach simpler to maintain. Again, Gentoo is a perfect fit.

      Is it a perfect fit for everyone? No. For most people? Hell no. For me? Yes.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    42. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      Very true. I'm quite familiar with CD errors as I have done a lot of work with audio CDs which don't have the added layer of error correction present on data discs. For most normal purposes, checking the md5sum of the cooked data before using it should be sufficient. At least you know the cooked data is still reading properly which is better than getting through half of an install and finding out the disc is bad.

      I doubt that in the few months that a distro ISO is good for (before the next version comes out) that the disc would deteriorate that much.

    43. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiyo Yuden 48x CD-R silver/blue media and a Lite-On LTR-40125S ZS0J. Cyanine dye - yes, 48x rated cyanine. Burns at 32x with no C1 errors on the disc consistently (unless you are deliberately writing weak sectors, for, say, copy protection mastering). Still totally C1-free three years later stored in a relatively normal, fairly cool, dark room and handled carefully and occasionally (although you should avoid heat and sunlight for all discs, pressed or otherwise, due to warping).

      Remember that you have to be able to produce a perfect disc to master - mastering houses reject discs containing C1 errors for some tasks (sometimes, repairing the weak sectors is not an option, like sending off a gold game).

      If you've ever had dud burns, it's because you're using cheap shitty media, probably sourced from CMC Magnetics (the eponymous Coaster Making Company). Some older media was okay but is now reaching its shelf life. Really bad media, today, sometimes won't last the day, or even the burn. Not all media is that bad. Taiyo Yuden is hands-down the best for virtually all burners. Ritek and Ricoh can be good too, but only if your burner likes them. Don't confuse manufacturers and brands - for example, Ritek are manufacturers, but Sony are a brand - they do NOT make CD-Rs - and will buy from whatever manufacturer they can. Most retail discs are branded, and quality can vary depending on manufacturer. Many dyes degrade over time - pthalocyanine is legendary for this, especially when produced to bad quality control standards.

      Basically, this goes for a lot of media - as costs come down, so does quality control. Those really cheap 10p CD-Rs are that cheap because they're rejects.

      Azo holds on pretty well, so does cyanine, but it's all about consistency and build quality, and the exact composition of the dye and impurities in the composite, and... oh, and the burner makes a huge difference too! Remember slower burns aren't always better, and that CMC media that was good right after you burned it might be jet black and dead a day later (I'm sure that's where those people got the idea for those disposable DVDs from).

      Good CD-R burns should last as long, carefully handled, as the majority of pressed discs - well over 20 years. Even the better CD-RWs do degrade, watch out for that. Beware label-side damage of any kind, or sunlight or heat exposure, as these will kill any CD, pressed or otherwise. DVD burns are weaker, especially +RW discs, but again it's all about media quality and drive tolerances and the format is too new to really be able to tell consistently.

      Put it like this. You're better off on a good CD-R burned with a good burner at a good speed than any floppy or tape, if you're not an asshole with storage and handling.

    44. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by BigJimSlade · · Score: 1

      but if you can handle a kernel compile, you'll have no problem with Gentoo.

      You don't even have to handle that now! They have added a new tool (read the instructions for more details on it) that will auto configure the makefile for the kernel to compile with all the options of the LiveCD. With these options, you should get all the hardware "detection" features of the LiveCD kernel on your installed system.

      Of course, Gentoo is always about options. You can still go thru and build the kernel yourself.

    45. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by auferstehung · · Score: 1

      Nothing against Gentoo, but let's give credit where credit it due. It's going to be a long time before Gentoo can be lumped in with the above distros.

      Like the LWN Distribution list of Leading Distributions.

      --
      Logic is not Divine.
    46. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by wdebruij · · Score: 1

      the biggest reason of all, I want to support Gentoo.


      then just donate directly. There's a link to paypal at the gentoo homepage. $10 in donations far outweights buying $15 of CD's.

    47. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by SaucyWrong777 · · Score: 1

      I have used windows my entire life. (Aside from a brief go with Slackware that I found unsatisfactory). Gentoo is the distro that finally broke that trend. I still use Windows for games, but I use Gentoo now just as much. I learned linux on a Gentoo system, and I'll probably be using it for as long as it stays around.

      The only problem I've had with it is that recently I rebuilt my computer from the ground up. I formatted everything and wanted to rebuild Gentoo using the 1.4 rc4 LiveCD, but the kernel they load wouldn't pick up my Integrated GigE controller. I was too lazy to get a kernel working, so I just waited for 1.4 Final. THankfully, my NIC was detected and as we speak my stage-1 installation is compiling happily away.

      I'll probably also spring for the pressed CDs :)

    48. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looking at the distrowatch figures is silly. I really don't think there are more Yoper installations out there than debian. These values are for the past week, and don't figure in the integration of years and years of installations long before there were these newer distros.

    49. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Yert · · Score: 1

      Getting debian to run on my R5K Indy was an 8 hour chore, just for the base system and apt-get. I've been thinking about trying Gentoo on the thing, but didn't know how mature the mips port is - if you feel like sharing your experience or some tips, could you drop me a line? The dick crashed a while back, and it's been collecting dust for about a year now, but I'd like to get it back in the game so I can help with the IndyCam driver development. :)

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    50. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by Yert · · Score: 1

      Concievably, you could NFS or Coda share the portage tree for that server farm, and that way, once one machine has compiled the app, the others could simply install it. Might save you a bit of time, if anything, as long as the hardware and compile options are the same.

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    51. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      And that is exactly what I have been using.

      Each server has a copy of the portage tree that is cloned from the build server. The make.conf file has them all use a common distfiles and packages directory over NFS. I do one step further and add a subdirectory for each architecture (i686, i486, etc). I was experimenting with compiling for athlon and pentiumIII, but I found that I really wasn't getting anything for the extra build time for each architecture. Now everything on my network is generic i686. I keep i486 around for some older equipment I deploy as kiosks.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    52. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      Taiyo Yudens are excellent, yes. I've always been impressed by the quality of burns on TY media. However it's not possible to burn to a disc without any bad bits... There seems to be an inconsistancy in consumer/hardware between reporting errors that C1 has fixed (happens on every disc) and errors that C1 wasn't able to fix (should be the case on a very good burn). The former is basically the same thing as BLER (though BLER is written as a rate rather than an absolute value) while the latter is worse.

      Unfortunately TY media is hard to get cheaply with any sort of good protective surface on the media layer. A lot of the bulk TY media you can get has very good media quality but is easy to damage...

      For my bulk stuff I usually use the ubiquitous TDKs. The majority of TDKs for sale today are made by Ritek, and you can tell them apart from the others by the markings on the inner rim. Unfortunately lately TDK has also sourced a bunch of discs from CMC Magnetics (blech). The CMCs have a really distinctive black ink labeling on the inner rim though so it's easy to spot them.

      A long time ago TDK made their own CD-Rs. I own a bunch. I don't know why they don't anymore.

      Anyway for archival stuff I still favor Verbatim's Datalife Plus (Mitsubishi Metal Azo). The initial burn quality is not quite as good as TY's but the discs have excellent coating and the Azo dye is extremely durable. All my Azo discs I've burned in the past are still very good today.

      Incidentally while Lite-Ons are excellent burners for the price, I still recommend Plextor Premiums over them for a quality burn... They simply use better parts (and you pay for that). Also Yamaha burners when you can still find them for sale are very good. It's a shame Yamaha exited the burner market. :-(

    53. Re:I don't mean to whore....but.... by pyr0 · · Score: 1
      Sorry for the slow response, but I just moved halfway across the country. Anyway, right now getting Gentoo to run may be more of a chore actually. The only real way to install it is to actually use Debian's netboot image much as you would use the Gentoo 1.4 live cd for a PC installation, meaning the initial part of the install is like Debian (getting DHCP on the network, tftp the image, etc). I started from the initial Stage 3 tarball because I had problems with 1 and 2. Kumba on #gentoo-mips on irc.freenode.net has been working on building new stage tarballs with more current packages, which should hopefully make things better. I think he has been thinking about trying to create a Gentoo netboot too so we don't have to use Debian's. The latest binutils properly supports mips I through IV ISA levels. In my make.conf, I use -mips4 -mabi=32 -Os -pipe (I think so...not at home to log into the machine).

      Since I installed, I have had few problems. I got Apache 2.0.46 with mod_php 4.3.1 (I think that's the right version...) and one of the latest mysql versions to all compile with no problems. I even compiled Xfree86 on it! If you are serious about trying Gentoo on your Indy, you might drop by the #gentoo-mips channel on freenode. There aren't too many people there usually, but the numbers are growing. I go as geoman there.

      Another thing, having a cross-compiler has been a savior for me. I have a howto I created that is actually hosted on my Indy's webserver, but I don't have internet at my new home yet, so I can't serve it up right now. If nothing else, compiling a kernel on my AthlonXP blows away waiting for it to compile on the Indy. Like I mentioned in the parent post to yours, I have succesfully used the cross-compiler through distcc too. Once you get the big things compiled for your system, the smaller programs typically don't take all that long. Whenever I have to update something, I do it while I'm asleep or away from home.

      I've actually been wondering about using my Indycam. The latest CVS kernel has support for the VINO/Indycam stuff, however from what I understand the clipping is all wrong. The driver loads for me but I have no idea how to try and capture an image...it was so much easier in IRIX. I've got a second Inday (R4K 100mhz) laying around that I was contemplating getting IRIX onto to just use it for the Indycam. Only problem is, it's got a GR3-XZ 24 bit grahpics board (I actually got the second Indy because it had the 24-bit XL board so I could use the newport console driver in linux on my R5K, and swapped video boards), which is apparently too new of a board for the PROM version in that machine, so it doesn't work. Anyway, I'm rambling now, so I'll quit. :)

  3. Tried it, will try it again by Akardam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although I had some major problems with Gentoo not booting after install on one of my test systems at work, I was still impressed with the relative ease presented by a system still so powerfully configurable and tweakable (I was installing from a Stage 1 1.4 (RC2 I think) build). I will definitely keep it on my list next time we have a box ready to roll out. I do wonder whatever happened to that one guy who wanted to fork Gentoo... did he ever follow thru with his plans?

    1. Re:Tried it, will try it again by Unregistered · · Score: 5, Informative

      ask for help in forums.gentoo.org if you have installation trouble. I'm sure we could have gotten you up and running easily.

    2. Re:Tried it, will try it again by register_ax · · Score: 1

      You mean Zachary T Welch? If we are talking about the same guy he did indeed follow through with his fork Zynot. It was discussed on slashdot on the 26th of June.

    3. Re:Tried it, will try it again by SWPadnos · · Score: 1
      Yes, he did.

      It's at http://www.zynot.org/.

      --
      - The Sigless Wonder
    4. Re:Tried it, will try it again by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      I am in the same boat as you. I wanted to like it, I really did. But it took way too long to get a decent system up and running, and gnome whorrrfed all over itself when I was trying to do the ol' emerge -u crap.

      Who has time to let their machine just sit and compile for days? But maybe if good things happen with 1.4 I'll try again. I'm a glutton for punishment though... this RH9 system has been nothing but beautiful for me so far.

  4. To all 1.4_rcx users by Unregistered · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do not need to reinstall. Gentoo version numbers only refer to the install CD. emerge -u world and you'll be in the same place you would be with a 1.4_final install.

    1. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Bytal · · Score: 2, Funny

      emerge -upD world will do the same exact thing as installing from this cd. ie it will rebuild all software to the latest version available in portage. Whether you would really want to do this and ruin your beautifull, stable system is, of course, up to you :)

    2. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by RealityShunt · · Score: 1

      Actually I'll be doing a new install on a different partition, so my old install remains intact regardless of the various mistakes I know I'll make.

      Having just bought a new 120Gb HD for the system ( the old install is in a 8 Gb partition on a 20G drive) I'm ready for and have the room for experimentation.

      That said, anyone out there in the Gentoo world had experience with doing the 2.6 series kernels with 1.4(beta)? Any advice would be appreciated.

      Thanks!
      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    3. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      Make sure you do a emerge modutils. compile the kernel with the command make;make modules_install(I'm not sure if you still need the modules_install), and make a dir called /sysfs That's about it. Also there is no bootsplash for 2.6 kernels if you want to have that.

    4. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a Gentoo fanatic, I do this monthly, which is roughly the amount of time it takes to finish.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    5. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      Someone mentioned on usenet a couple days ago something about pty support in the kernel. What's up with that?

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    6. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by swillden · · Score: 1

      You do not need to reinstall.

      Eh? Would you*ever* have to reinstall? I thought perpetual upgradability was one of the strengths of Gentoo, like Debian.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Time to upgrade that 486 ;)

      My P4-1.8Ghz does that in about a little under 24 hours.
      Of course, you can still do whatever you normally do while your doing that, it'll just be a little slower.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Which is good to know, since I missed this announcement while going from stage1 to full install this afternoon... seriously...

      Unfortunately, this post comes from Mozilla on Windows XP because I have yet to emerge - say, X, or anything like that - but I did really spend the afternoon installing from a stage1 1.4_rc3 CD... *sigh*

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    9. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by cosjef · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a 2.4 to 2.6 guide.

    10. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by trippinonbsd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats whats nice is for man! nice -20 emerge -u world or you could even make a dedicated nice xterm nice -20 xterm or a "mean" one! nice --20 xterm Nice keeps everything running nice and smooth!

    11. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by RealityShunt · · Score: 1

      thank you thank you!!! /me crashes for the night, two days of work then the fun begins :)

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    12. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by mobets · · Score: 1

      I tried it, but couldn't get nvidia's drivers to compile for it. I didn't try very hard, but gentoo's installer, and the installer I downloaded directly from nVidia gave errors.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    13. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by register_ax · · Score: 1
      You should also check your hard disks, they could be bottling up. hdparm seems to be all too often overlooked. hdparm /dev/hda would let you see set parameters and hdparm -tT /dev/hda would run it through a test. Obvious warning...the command can be hazardous to data when setting your system to unsupported schemes.

      from man:

      hdparm provides a command line interface to various hard disk ioctls supported by the stock Linux ATA/IDE device driver subsystem. Some options may work correctly only with the latest kernels. For best results, compile hdparm with the include files from the latest kernel source code.

      OPTIONS
      When no flags are given, -acdgkmnru is assumed.

      from version:
      $ /sbin/hdparm -V
      hdparm v5.2

      tutorial @ http://linux.oreillynet.com/pub/a/linux/2000/06/29 /hdparm.html

    14. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even my now lowly P3 1ghz does an emerge -U world in a couple hours, tops, after 2 weeks or so of updates. *shrug*

      Its not like they update the big stuff (Xfree, OpenOffice, Gnome, KDE) every month. Even then you're looking at 24 hours *maybe* on a slower machine. Hell I run Gentoo on my ancient G3/450, too, and I'm not particularly bothered by install times.

    15. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      I'm running 2.6 beta right now with the NVidia drivers. Make sure you're using media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496 as the latest drivers in portage don't work with 2.6.

    16. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by hdparm · · Score: 1
      hdparm seems to be all too often overlooked.

      Thanks for mentioning that, man ;o)

    17. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Likes+Microsoft · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I thought the point of Gentoo is that for people who already have it installed, release versions become irrelevant.

      --
      -- Who am I? How did I get here? My God, what have I done?!
    18. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Funny, I'm getting bugfixes and updates all the time in Debian unstable for the packages you mention. And someone did recompile them, although it sure as hell wasn't me, thank God. My computer has more important things to do.

    19. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Zigg · · Score: 1

      When I used Gentoo, I did have to reinstall it a few times. Things may have gotten better since, but having been a packager for OpenBSD awhile, and observing how most ebuilds were constructed at the time, I was frankly shocked things didn't fall apart more often.

      The biggest problem was a blatant disregard for the fact that just about any given open source package is going to compile differently based on what's on your system unless you very, very explicitly specify its intended feature set beforehand. Not observing that gives you a nice system at the time, but one that is absolute hell to upgrade or slim down.

      You need predictable dependencies, and that's one of the key reasons I swear by Debian.

    20. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Tony · · Score: 1

      emerge -upD world will do the same exact thing as installing from this cd.

      Yay! I get to nitpick!

      Just a quick correction before all these newbies think that the install consists of lists of packages scrolling up the screen: you *really* want emerge -uD world . The p in "emerge -upD world" tells it to print out what it would do, and not really do it.

      Leave out the "p". You'll be happier for it.

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    21. Re:To all 1.4_rcx users by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except you'd get boned because of one or two minor niggling little problems.

      Man, I hate that distro now. It's like "let's all go back to 1995 when we had to figure this shit out the first time!" Whee.

  5. Changelog! Getcha changelog! by James+A.+A.+Joyce · · Score: 4, Informative

    Changelog, hot off the press!

    (Now I wonder how long it will be before someone posts the "Gentoo Linux Zealot Translator"?)

    1. Re:Changelog! Getcha changelog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats todays changelog only, quite long if you ask me, hehe :-)

    2. Re:Changelog! Getcha changelog! by Luke-Jr · · Score: 2, Informative

      That appears to be the daily CVS changelog which covers the portage tree, which has nothing to do with releases...

      --
      Luke-Jr
    3. Re:Changelog! Getcha changelog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [user@slashdot]$ emerge anonymous-gentoy-fanboy

  6. Wooohooo! by RealityShunt · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's time to finally start that Gentoo install with the 2.6 kernel series that I've been putting off.

    I've been seriously too interested in the outside this summer. I have an actual tan, a girlfriend, and have put enough miles on the bike that I have to replace the tires. Enough! It's time for this insanity to stop!

    Time to download and emerge! Bring on those multi-hour computer sessions! Woot!

    --
    Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    1. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      multi-hour? what kind of geek measures his computer sessions in anything less than whole days

    2. Re:Wooohooo! by phyrestang · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget the bike, how many miles on the girlfriend?

    3. Re:Wooohooo! by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      *per day* my friend, per day! :) realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    4. Re:Wooohooo! by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      flamebait?

      Humor impaired mod.....I've been running Gentoo since Rc1.4_1 and use it pretty much exclusive of every other OS on this computer. Screw you.

      It's a reality of Gentoo that one spends a lot more time loading and configuring the OS than on most other modern distributions. We at least ought to be able to joke about it. Guess the mod just didn't understand. Too bad. He/she should give Gentoo a try. It rocks.

      Read my comment asking advice about 2.6 elsewhere in this story thread....

      realityshunt
      [ looking forward to a weekend spent inside on the 'puter while it is over 100 deg F outside ]

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    5. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well in order to figure that out, we'd have to know:
      a. how many times per week he has sex
      b. how often each session lasts
      c. how fast a fucker he is
      d. how long his dick is

      somehow I doubt we're gonna get that info outta him :)

    6. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's 15 years old, hence the bike rather than a car. Even if she's dating a nerd at that age, she can't be that weathered.

    7. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you haven't heard of motorcycles. They're like bicycles, but a lot more powerful.

      Sheesh. Kids these days.

    8. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rest assured that those of us in our mid-late twenties will find better things to do during our mid-life crises than buying a motorcycle...

      Like going for twenty year old girls, yeah, that's the ticket.

    9. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that dude from six feet under got a motorcycle...albeit for free it was still his escape...or was he in his 30s making him an irrelevant example?

    10. Re:Wooohooo! by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Forget the bike, how many miles on the girlfriend?

      The unit of girlfriend usage is a 'thrust' not a mile.

    11. Re:Wooohooo! by joss · · Score: 1

      That aroused my curiosity and I am such a geek, I just had to get a rough idea. I reckon that reasonably regular sex will lay down about a mile a month [and I think you know what I'm saying], but you're welcome to do your own math.

      If women [and men too I guess] came with a 500 mile warranty, marriage wouldnt be such a scary prospect :/ and divorce would be far less common.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    12. Re:Wooohooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not familiar with the show, so I couldn't tell you.

    13. Re:Wooohooo! by geeklawyer · · Score: 1

      ha ha!! "where the British empire stashes its loot" funny blog

      --
      -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
      journal
  7. Gentoo... by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah the best part about gentoo is... emerge openoffice 16 hours later you have a build.

    1. Re:Gentoo... by billatq · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah the best part about gentoo is... emerge openoffice 16 hours later you have a build.

      Or emerge openoffice-bin and get it for the time it takes to download :-). Of course, I'm using FreeBSD right now..

    2. Re:Gentoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hm,... the install takes only 15 seconds if you use GRP (btw gentoo developers, it would be nice if you combined this with p2p!)

    3. Re:Gentoo... by hatrisc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      though, using distcc with a cluster of about 16 nodes, you should be able to cut that down to an hour. of course, not many people have 2 free computers at home, let alone 16.

      --
      I write code.
    4. Re:Gentoo... by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, do what I did.

      1. Set your Athlon XP 2000+ box up with Gentoo

      2. Optimize everything for the Athlon

      3. Set out a plate of milk and cookies.

      4. Start the openoffice emerge running

      5. Go to bed

      In the morning the milk and cookies will be gone and the OpenOffice elves will have left you a copy of OpenOffice, tailored to your machine.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    5. Re:Gentoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? only took 436 minutes to do emerge ximian openoffice on my 1800xp. Would have been less but I wasn't aware the a flakey ide cable was making my dma drop to udma2.

    6. Re:Gentoo... by TCM · · Score: 1

      Remember, this is /.

      I don't reach 16 myself, though :(

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    7. Re:Gentoo... by Synn · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wow, so it compiles in about the same amount of time it takes to start it up...

    8. Re:Gentoo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sleeping for 18hrs isn't exactly healthy.

    9. Re:Gentoo... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      I remember when I had Gentoo installed (reverted to Debian now), and first installing X and KDE after a Stage 1 install. I set it going about 0100 and went to bed. The next morning, I got up at 0700, (naively) hoping it'd finished. I then went to work, came home and it still hadn't finished. I went to bed early that night, and the next morning, I had X and lovely shiny KDE 3.1 ready to go!

      Gentoo isn't a distro for people without patience!

    10. Re:Gentoo... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Besides, I've found that compiling OO.o works better than a package. I've built it on gentoo and freebsd and have been free of the random crashes that plagued my debian install. Weird little things like rotating a 3d object would crash it before.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  8. Re:Story not posted from Gentoo 1.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    actually it was. :-) Thnxs to the Gentoo reference platform (collection of pre-built stuff) a 20 minutes or less install (with KDE/gnome,X,apache,sql...) is possible

  9. good news! by dcstimm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want to thank Drobbins, Seemant, and All the gentoo developers! Thanks for your hard work for makeing linux even better!

    Please support gentoo by going to gentoo.org and buying the livecds...

    1. Re:good news! by El+Neepo · · Score: 1

      "Please support gentoo by going to gentoo.org and buying the livecds..."

      Why? Gentoo is a for-profit company, donations and other typical "support the unpaid open source developers" sentiments don't apply.

    2. Re:good news! by Luke-Jr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I understand it, that's only because it was easier to register a for-profit company when Gentoo was started. I think we are trying to change to non-profit, though.

      --
      Luke-Jr
  10. Gentoo fork? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I am looking forward to seeing the Gentoo fork (Zynot) release some code.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Gentoo fork? by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

      Someone catch this on the metamod...

      How is this a troll? If you thought the poster was trying to ignite flamage, then the post was "-1 Flamebait." (which would still be wrong)

      It's easy to check whether the poster is trolling.

      The Zynot Foundation

      Weeell, I'll be. Iff'in there ain't a Zynot Foundation that went and forked the Gentoo distro.

      For the record, I'll be interested to see what the Zynot Foundation does with the Gentoo code base, too. They're supposed to be bringing it to the embedded market easier through better support for cross compiling, plus a different portage implementation.

      --
      -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    2. Re:Gentoo fork? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Why is this a troll?
      It's merely a statement!

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  11. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe that this got modded down! This was a complete truth!

  12. Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Official Gentoo-Linux-Zealot translator-o-matic

    Gentoo Linux is an interesting new distribution with some great features. Unfortunately, it has attracted a large number of clueless wannabes who absolutely MUST advocate Gentoo at every opportunity. Let's look at the language of these zealots, and find out what it really means...

    "Gentoo makes me so much more productive."

    "Although I can't use the box at the moment because it's compiling something, as it will be for the next five days, it gives me more time to check out the latest USE flags and potentially unstable optimisation settings."

    "Gentoo is more in the spirit of open source!"

    "Apart from Hello World in Pascal at school, I've never written a single program in my life or contributed to an open source project, yet staring at endless streams of GCC output whizzing by somehow helps me contribute to international freedom."

    "I use Gentoo because it's more like the BSDs."

    "Last month I tried to install FreeBSD on a well-supported machine, but the text-based installer scared me off. I've never used a BSD, but the guys on Slashdot say that it's l33t though, so surely I must be for using Gentoo."

    "Heh, my system is soooo much faster after installing Gentoo."

    "I've spent hours recompiling Fetchmail, X-Chat, gEdit and thousands of other programs which spend 99% of their time waiting for user input. Even though only the kernel and glibc make a significant difference with optimisations, and RPMs and .debs can be rebuilt with a handful of commands, my box MUST be faster. It's nothing to do with the fact that I've disabled all startup services and I'm running BlackBox instead of GNOME or KDE."

    "...my Gentoo Linux workstation..."

    "...my overclocked AMD eMachines box from PC World, and apart from the third-grade made-to-break components and dodgy fan..." "You Red Hat guys must get sick of dependency hell..."

    "I'm too stupid to understand that circular dependencies can be resolved by specifying BOTH .rpms together on the command line, and that problems hardly ever occur if one uses proper Red Hat packages instead of mixing SuSE, Mandrake and Joe's Linux packages together (which the system wasn't designed for)."

    "All the other distros are soooo out of date."

    "Constantly upgrading to the latest bleeding-edge untested software makes me more productive. Never mind the extensive testing and patching that Debian and Red Hat perform on their packages; I've just emerged the latest GNOME beta snapshot and compiled with -09 -fomit-instructions, and it only crashes once every few hours."

    "Let's face it, Gentoo is the future."

    "OK, so no serious business is going to even consider Gentoo in the near future, and even with proper support and QA in place, it'll still eat up far too much of a company's valuable time. But this guy I met on #animepr0n is now using it, so it must be growing!"

    1. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative
      That's cute and all, but if you get scared off by the FreeBSD or Debian install process, RUN LIKE HELL FROM GENTOO. I use Gentoo myself, and it's great, but it's not an install for the newbie. That said, after you've gone though the full install (I'm talking stage 1, none of that stage 3 wimp stuff) you will have learned a LOT more about how Linux works than you will from a text based installer.

      PS. Good job on reaching 1.4! Go Gentoo!

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. My friend who never touched a CLI before, or a programming language managed to follow through the line by line instructions on the gentoo website.
      disklabel is one hell of a lot more confusing than Linux' fdisk, as is the forgiving network configuration (the entering netmask in hex froze me for a minute).
      Gentoo is for a new class of newbie: one that has time to fiddle and not just click install.
      And how does emerge kde (to install everything required by kde) teach you how the kernel works? Or partitioning? Or newfs? Or /etc/resolv.conf? Or how the C libraries work? Or how the system is based?
      It doesn't, it's just a time consuming load of hogwash leet wannabees jump onto to say 'I use a source distro!'

    3. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by lurgyman · · Score: 1

      ...and I'd like to take time to point out how wonderful it is that Gentoo has unified almost all the trolling on /. into the battle of the Gentooists vs. NonGentooists, without discrimination on the basis of topic or facts. :)

    4. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      I've actually noticed a significant improvement in KDE's responsiveness under heavy system load with my Gentoo install, as vs. my Mandrake and RH installs on the same box (with same kernel version and recompiled kernels from the dist kernel).

      I don't have any benchmarks, and can't really prove it, but there is a noticeable difference. No, I can't explain it...but it *is* why I use the Gentoo install much more often than either of the other ones.

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    5. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      I absolute agree. I used Mandrake and RH for a few years (mostly for their beautiful stability over windows); installing Gentoo taught me a lot about how the system operates -- especially about config files and what they are for, and about kernel compiles/config.

      I'm pretty thoroughly hooked now :)

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    6. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Depends on what you mean by difficult. Try hacking the RedHat 6.1 installer to boot on a thinkpad with 16MB of RAM, and a modern PCMCIA network card.

      And this was last year, because 7.+ refuses to even LOOK at a machine with less than 32MB. The boot from scratch and do everything by hand approach I ended up learning by my self through weeks of excruciating trial, error, and usenet clippings.

      Then of course there is the wonderful habit the RedHat installer has of mounting my RAID as /dev/sda during installation. When the new OS starts, it moves to /dev/sdd, completely frelling the /etc/fstab file. I ended up booting those server off of floppies for close to a year. It was only until I played with the Gentoo installer that I learned enough about the boot process to permanently fix that problem.

      Point in click is nice. But I generally find it doesn't make my life any easier. But then again, my world seems a little strange to outsiders.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by mvdw · · Score: 1

      Bah, kids these days. I installed slackware 8.0 on a machine with a small amount of RAM (8? MB) - start first console, fdisk, mkswap, computer died from lack of RAM. Next boot, swapon, and you're away. 16MB is no challenge at all.

      The trick I've found with RedHat is to use the "text" mode install - it uses a lot less memory; you might even be able to do it with 16MB or less.

    8. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Nope, the 32Mb limit is built into the installer. Believe me, text mode was my first thought to. I did actually try slackware in the process of getting Linux on these thinkpads. (Not to mention Debian and a few LFS micro-distros.)

      6.1 didn't care about the memory, but it didn't understand how to talk to the PCMCIA network card I had. I finally tricked it into using an existing kernel module by mounting the compressed initrd from the netboot floppy, hacking the pcmcia subsystem, and then ALSO hacking the RedHat installer script. Immediately followed by unmounting the compressed image, and reinserting it onto the floppy.

      Yeah, yeah, cake to me now. But everything seems like rocket science the first time you do it. Damn, I didn't even know python before I started futzing with the Anaconda scripts.

      And all that to install a minimal X-windows system to act as a remote terminal...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    9. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Gunfighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I installed Gentoo at several of my customer sites. Some of the installations replaced Windows servers, others replaced Red Hat installations, and some are brand new servers.

      I can tell you, without a doubt, that real, serious businesses are using Gentoo very successfully. Granted, someone less familiar with Linux could very easily have slapped up a RedHat9.x server for them in less time, but with Gentoo I was able to give the customers exactly what they wanted. I was able to give them a very robust, secure solution thanks to the minimalist nature of Gentoo. No features they didn't want, no services they didn't want, and everything went without a hitch (with the exception of one customer's PHP 4.3.2 thanks to his programmer naming some functions the same as the native PHP functions... duh).

      Case in point: One local customer had been running a Samba server on RedHat with Win98 clients. They wanted to increase security by establishing a PDC for their domain AND move their website in house (Java-powered site running under Tomcat). I configured the RedHat Samba instance to use LDAP only to find that... Redhat's Samba doesn't (or didn't at the time) support LDAP! A Gentoo installation later (ok... so I went home and came back the next day while the Stage2 compiled... big deal), and it was as simple as 'USE="ldap" emerge samba tomcat' to get them up and running. They recently called me to say that they liked my idea of switching from their (albeit lacking and somewhat poorly designed by someone else) Java-based site to a Plone site. 'emerge apache plone' and away we go.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    10. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that - what - the seventeenth time you've posted this?

    11. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by MrKinkade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apart from the fact I could have sworn I saw an identical post like this the other day, a quick response from a general linux newbie. Might be a little more deserving of it's mod if it were original.

      As a newbie, I didn't find Gentoo difficult to install what so ever. It comes with a step by step instructions that are only difficult to follow if you don't understand English. I'm sure I'm not alone here. The thing that makes text based installs hard is when the developers fail to explain some of the terminolgy they use in the install. First time I installed and put slack on my computer the interface wasn't daunting, but I had absolutely zero clue as to what / or /dev/hda1 was, and neither was it properly explained.

      The reasons why I like using Gentoo are:

      a) Better understanding of linux.

      I really hated slack when I first used it. Not because it performed badly or anything like that. It was the fact that there was so much to be included in the install that I didn't need or I had no clue as to what it did, and therefore if it was really useful to me. When you don't understand a system it makes it hard to decide what is cruft and what is depended on or important.

      With gentoo this was different, I started off with your basic shell, that is the bare essentials of the system that I could add the parts I wanted to. Also when emerging something, the building text flying past didn't help me me feel like I was empowered with the good of open source, but I DID get to see the dependancies of a program as it was downloaded (or using -p to show this without actually downloading any source).

      b) To have only what I need, and not what disto's think I should have.

      I could do all this with debian and forgo the compiling, but from what I am aware it takes new versions of packages absolutely ages to get into stable Debian releases.

      Really, this is just a cry for people to notice the cut&paste reply of the zealot translation.

    12. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Xabraxas · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It doesn't, it's just a time consuming load of hogwash leet wannabees jump onto to say 'I use a source distro!'

      Must

      Not

      Feed

      The

      Trolls!

      Oh I just can't help it. First of all...NO. You'd be surprised to find out that there are many experienced Linux users using Gentoo. It's about choice and it's about control. Gentoo gives its users the most fine grained control of any Linux distro and it does it in a very usable way. See my sig for details.

      Gentoo does force a lot of people to learn more about Linux than they do whether they like it or not. This is not to say that it's not possible with other distros but there are no gui utilities for Gentoo and so the users are forced to use the CLI much more and are forced to edit config files much more, giving them a crash course education in Linux. Whether this is the best way or not is debatable, but whether or not people tend to learn more with Gentoo, well, that is not debatable. Read the forums. Personally I'm happy that a lot of newbies are jumping in with Gentoo and learning a lot more off the bat than they would with Red Hat or Mandrake. To each his own. Let's not fight about distros, at least we're all using Linux.

      I don't think it's fashionable to use Gentoo although it seems quite fashionable to bash Gentoo.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    13. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      *pffft*

      I made that installer work on an IBM 486sx with 8M of mem.
      Tried getting more mem but couldn't find anything that fit to that box.
      It was funny as hell tho :D

      Took me 2 days, but I learned to use loop-back devices that day! =)

    14. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      If you like to learn a lot how the system works, make a free partition and start consuming this:

      http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/

      I once created a LFS. I was going to make my very own distro for one box so I know exactly what's in there.

      After I had finished, I came to the conclusion that it is wayyy too much of a hassle for me to track all the patches myself.

      Now using Debian on that box. I'm much happier now that I know what each file on the system does.

      It was also a great excersise to learn the build and compilation tools better. I "cross" compiled that on a AMD Athlon. Target was Pentium I.

    15. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you get scared off by the FreeBSD or Debian install process, RUN LIKE HELL FROM GENTOO

      Load of crap. Unless you have ADD, Gentoo installation is really just a test of your l33t abilities to read instructions and type things that could be scripts.

      Compare to Debian, who's installer barely does anything and leaves one to have fun with modprobe and RTFM.

      I don't see how anyone who could have managed to install OS/2 (for example) could have any problem with FreeBSD.

    16. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh maybe you should try doing something other than a full install in slack and then you'd realize that you can get the "bare essentials" of the system by only sellecting what has been marked as required or reccommended in the slack install.
      I have nothing against gentoo, I personally dont use it because the optimizations really dont have much benefit, I dont have time to site around for hours for things to compile, I can learn much more from debian than I can from gentoo. I used the unstable of debian, and it is DAMN stable. What I'm hearing from you are professions from a self proclaimed newbie saying "I dont know how to install slackware the way I want, and if you want new stuff you have to *shudder* use an unstable version" Basically you haven't tried anything other than slackware where you blindly did a full install. You are told that you will learn a lot of linux by using gentoo, so you proclaim that as well. You would seriously learn more using slackware. Your own post is proof of that fact. Now that you have emerge, you're really never gonna know everything that's on your machine unless you stop before each emerge and look up exactly what it's installing.
      If you've ever been a unix admin in a high paced environment, you'll realize that gentoo really isn't suitable.. especially when you need a 14 1u webfarm up and running NOW.

    17. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by zsau · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That said, after you've gone though the full install ... you will have learned a LOT more about how Linux works than you will from a text based installer.

      Nonesense. I use Gentoo. I learnt most of what I know of Linux from my Slackware days before Gentoo, so maybe I'm mistaken, but I'm almost certain that installing Gentoo doesn't teach you all that much. You know mostly what you have installed, but you don't learn of the significance of the various packages when you emerge system or run the bootstrap script. You don't even now how to ./configure --help | less; ./configure [desired options] && make && make install!

      --
      Look out!
    18. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Redhat since 5.2 on a pair of PCs (just your basic file/print/net/mail/firewall/proxy cache/web/etc servers) I've learnt more about Linux after installing Gentoo 3 months ago than I did in the previous 3 or 4 years of rpm'ing, dl'ing, rpm'ing, f'ing and blinding.

      I want to know how it all works, because it's the only way I'm going to know how to fix a linux setup when it's stuffed. I've now got 5 gentoo machines on the network (2 of them dual-boot with windows) and they distcc to their heart's content.

      Sure, it takes time to compile but before I leave work tonight I'll emerge -U world on this machine. It can slog its guts out while I'm not here ;-)

      Cheers
      Simon

    19. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by fruey · · Score: 1
      CRUX

      The perfect lightweight distro. Total ISO size less than 200Mb, I installed it without problems on an old PI 233MHz with 32M RAM, could have got away with 16M.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    20. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used RedHat since 7.3 started in Nov of last year. In that time I have used SuSe, Mandrake and Slackware. They where all broke in som e way or another. I was able to get free BSD , Debian,Turbo Linux, installed but could not get X configured to where it would start period. I tried Gentoo stage 3 and was unable to even get that installed. I tried rc 1.4 for athalon. I got 3 Gentoo Essentials CDs. I havent even looked at these. I hope they are the source you all are talking about so I can use them on my RedHat Box that is not broken. I still have slackware 9 on the other box. I am going to try and fix the shutdown scripts. halt -p wont power down it is much like a crappy 95 PC we have at work then its safe to turn off the power. Of course the power managment in SuSe was broken also. It would not power down the moniter period. RedHat 7.3 worked flawlessly on this PC.
      I cant get X configured in debian and cant even get Gentoo stage 3 installed. I guess I will stick to RedHat for the real work. And try and learn more through the use of Slackware.
      Take Care

    21. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Try hacking the RedHat 6.1 installer to boot on a thinkpad with 16MB of RAM, and a modern PCMCIA network card.

      Try emerge-ing anything on that same Thinkpad...

    22. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      In those cases I build the entire OS on a modern box, chroot, and perform the install. Once the "new" OS is ready I make it into a tarball. During the installation on the thinkpad, I simply use my tarball instead of one of the Gentoo stages.

      And btw, emerging small packages isn't all that bad. Would I try to build KDE? No. But then again, you wouldn't really want to run KDE on a thin machine like that either. XFCE is good enough for me. Anything more complicated and I just run the programs off my big machine through ssh, or just slave the laptop over to the big machine with:

      X -indirect thebigbox

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    23. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by kindbud · · Score: 1

      That said, after you've gone though the full install (I'm talking stage 1, none of that stage 3 wimp stuff) you will have learned a LOT more about how Linux works than you will from a text based installer.

      I have to disagree with that. I installed Gentoo 1.4pre-release, and was hardly at the machine for most of it, so what it installed and how it installed it, I didn't see. I don't think I would have known what was going on, in fact, unless I had previous exposure to Linux installations.

      But then my first Linux install was Slackware 1.0 with kernel 0.98pl12. I think you can learn more about how Linux works by building your own router floppy. Learning what you can get away with throwing out is more instructive, I think, than watching all the crap you can toss in get tossed in.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    24. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Jeedo · · Score: 1

      For a guy whou couldn't install FreeBSD or debian on his desktop and is now using Gentoo as his only operating system that makes me smile:)

    25. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      This is funny BECAUSE IT'S FRIGGING TRUE.

      I spent 1 month with that disaster called Gentoo. If you know nothing about Linux or Unix and you want to learn the innards, then by all means, Gentoo kicks ass.

      If you want to get ANYTHING done, use another distro.

      (I've been using Linux since about late 1994, and Gentoo totally reminds me of the bad old days... Now I have better things to do with my time than wait 48 frigging hours for KDE to compile (again, because the first time I apparently did something wrong).)

    26. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      I 100% agree with you. Compile-time is not an issue with Gentoo. The only time investment is on install but like was discussed on this thread - it's a non-issue since it's a total learning experience. One of the things I like the most about Gentoo is how (for the most part) the software that is installed is the default version straight from the open source projects and not customized by a distribution vendor to work with this GUI and that other CLI program. When I need to know how something works about a program, I can still completely use the actual documentation for that program and know that it's the same thing. That is a big help.

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
    27. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by MrKinkade · · Score: 1

      Just quickly, and for your information. I haven't done a single full install of Slackware... Ever.

      Only installs I have done have been using menu or expirenced mode, which allowed me to look at what was being installed and on my second attempt allowed me to remove duplicate applications (And by duplicate I mean duplication of function, ie. having bitchx AND xchat is a waste of space. Having KDE/QT AND Gnome/GTK is also a waste of space). I haven't liked full-installs since Windows and I prefer to remove some of the stuff I don't need during install, rather than later.

      And, with regard to: "Now that you have emerge, you're really never gonna know everything that's on your machine unless you stop before each emerge and look up exactly what it's installing"

      Now, which of these two methods is easier:

      1) installing hundreds of packages and sifting through them for the ones I want, and the dependances that the applications need. [Slack install doesn't do anything about dependancies. If yo remove a library a package depends on, if you don't know what it needs, you're fucked. It's not going to work, is it?]

      or

      2) watching emerge fetch packages and dependancies or just doing a pretend emerge.

      Either way I know what is needed by what, and personally, I think that being given the information through emerge will help me learn faster than hunting it down will.

      The complete opposite is true of your statement about my "proclaiming" Gentoo being easier to use. For one, I wasn't making such claims. What I was saying is that it's not as hard as people say it is. AND that the install was well documented and explained better than Slacks.

      Really, I just think you need to actually read the post, and quit with the assumptions. You should know what happens when you ASSuME.

    28. Re:Ask And Ye Shall Receive. . . by Zigg · · Score: 1

      Oh, come now.

      Gentoo: emerge -k hotplug; rc-update add hotplug default

      Debian: apt-get install discover hotplug

      The difference? The latter doesn't require compilation.

      (At the risk of being uninformed, like the parent post, would it not be true that hotplug is only going to deal with hotplug PCI and USB devices? discover, OTOH, deals with PCI, ISAPNP, etc. etc. etc.)

  13. Wow! The Anti Joyce league is at it again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post has been modded Informative, Funny, Overrated and Flamebait. Who knows where it will end up?

  14. The funny part is... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Informative
    That most of us Gentoo users are already running 1.4.

    Sigh, whatever Distro can upgrade the entire OS (in place!) with a single command: emerge -u world.

    Of course, some pressed discs would be nice for posterity.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:The funny part is... by SyntheticTruth · · Score: 1


      FreeBSD. :-)

      Buildworld is different, but same concept. I have a new server I'm needing to get up and running, I think I'm gonna be using Gentoo on this one.

    2. Re:The funny part is... by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sigh, whatever Distro can upgrade the entire OS (in place!) with a single command: emerge -u world.

      redhat: apt-get dist-upgrade
      debian: apt-get dist-upgrade
      yum: yum update

      I upgraded from Redhat9 to the new beta this way.

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    3. Re:The funny part is... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the time I tried to upgrade glibc on 7.2, following that infamous "every week a new vulnerability" phase last year. I would attempt to upgrade GLIBC, only to find that the package needed a new version of RPM. I tried to update RPM, but it needed a new version of GLIBC. Upgrade them both, and I discovered exactly how many packages rely on GLIBC...

      'Twas messy.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:The funny part is... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Good luck. I find portage nice. A little choatic at times... but what is life without a little variety.

      My problem is that I've been continually patching my boxes since 1.4-rc2. There have been dozens of changes to the baselayout and dependency tree, so every once in a while I find myself performing surgery to explain how to get there from here to my poor confused computer.

      I'm just glad to have the option.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:The funny part is... by tdrury · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've never used apt-get. Does it compile from sources like emerge?

    6. Re:The funny part is... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Nope... apt-get is a frontend for dpkg on debian.
      Essentially, it sees the dependancies, snags them from the net, and manages everything for you.
      Of course, entirely in binary format.

      I believe you can do it in source also with certain flags, but I've never tried it.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:The funny part is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try apt for RPM (what the previous poster is referring to) or up2date.

      *sigh* Some people will never stop bashing RH when the problem is really just their own stupidity.

    8. Re:The funny part is... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Apt-rpm I thought up2date was the total "shiznit" until I found apt-get for rpms. One thing, it helps me find crap I don't need. The other day doing a dist-upgrade, it was going to upgrade xchat. And I though, I don't use xchat! So I removed it. Who knows, maybe someone will port emerge to redhat. :P

    9. Re:The funny part is... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Stupidity is a state of mind. Someone else's mind, at least.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    10. Re:The funny part is... by biostatman · · Score: 1

      mandrake: urpmi --auto-select

      --
      For the love of $DEITY, loose != not win!!!!!
    11. Re:The funny part is... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It can, it's not as transparent as emerge though.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  15. Gentoo has a new USE flag by snkmoorthy · · Score: 4, Funny

    USE="-SCO" emerge gentoo

    1. Re:Gentoo has a new USE flag by Dante333 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude I thoguht you where kidding, but I checked. Sweeeet

    2. Re:Gentoo has a new USE flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? What does it do? (having seen the "checked it" post and having run a quick search....

    3. Re:Gentoo has a new USE flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's rather weak (then again most of the gentoo community (apart from Mark and Jason) are like this). Thie SCO tag causes a DOS pings at SCO while doing emerge. It's pretty childish and weak, though it wouldnt have much an effect (since the pings are being sent to a server that usually does not reply to them)

    4. Re:Gentoo has a new USE flag by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      Too bad the USE flags doesn't work like you imply - they only modify the way ebuilds with support for that specific flag get built, not the way emerge runs.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    5. Re:Gentoo has a new USE flag by axxackall · · Score: 1
      USE="-SCO" emerge gentoo

      These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

      Calculating dependencies ...done!
      [Blocks B ] other-distro/SCO

      USE "gentoo" emerge unmerge SCO

      --

      Less is more !
    6. Re:Gentoo has a new USE flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe so, but that is kind of amusing.

      and, I think you are dead wrong about most of the Gentoo community. there is a LOT of really nice stuff in portage just waiting to be emerged into your system.

      Those people don't get enough credit, so calling them "weak" is out of line.

      Now, I would agree that there is just too much politics in the gentoo group, and that most of the gentoo forum postings are very nubie/intro sort of "how do I set up apache" but the developers deserve thanks, not a slap in the face.

      so, THANK YOU GENTOO DEVELOPERS!

      signed,
      Anonymous Coward

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. AMD-XP Watch out by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just reading the forumabout 1.4 release, seems AMD-XP CD2 has problems.


    "GRP CD2 for Athlon XP is not available currently. Frankly, we've had all sorts of problems with the Athlon XP build.

    Athlon XP users can safely use the i686 set."

    1. Re:AMD-XP Watch out by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm running 1.4 on an Athlon I built from stage 1. The trick is to use mem=nopentium. There is an errata between the Kernel, GCC, the Athlon XP, and possibly some mother-board memory controllers that causes the 4 to not play nice. Before I stumbled on the solution on the forums the machine would lock up randomly.

      YMMV.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:AMD-XP Watch out by Dolohov · · Score: 1

      I should point out that I just installed CD1 on my Athlon XP and it seems to be working fine so far, though I'm not quite finished.

    3. Re:AMD-XP Watch out by PotPieMan · · Score: 1

      I wonder what those of us who purchased the Athlon XP CD set are going to receive.

    4. Re:AMD-XP Watch out by fosk · · Score: 1

      YMMV indeed. I've had no such problems with my XP and 1.4 from stage 1 so I must lack that motherboard memory controller that screws up :) Is this yet again something VIA related? The only thing that's managed to lock up the machine is KDE3 with some unstable keramik update.. BTW I use the regular x86 ebuilds, not ~x86.

    5. Re:AMD-XP Watch out by scott-thomason · · Score: 1

      I'm running dual AMD-MP's, and everything works just great...rock solid indefinitely (at least, until a thunderstorm blinks the power out). FYI, here is my CFLAGS:

      CFLAGS="-w -march=athlon-mp -O2 -pipe -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -mfpmath=sse"

      I did have trouble with this hardware when I first bought it...bad RAM. Bleeding edge XP/MP chips are very choosy about their RAM. After returning mine for RAM that passed my vendor's memtest86, only to have it still fail mine in a few locations, I resolved the problem by UNDERCLOCKING the chips just a hair (with soft-BIOS clocking, you can tweak it just a few cycles at a time). Now everything is rock-solid. But the point of this is...it wasn't the software causing the flakiness!

  18. More Torrents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://f.scarywater.net/

  19. Gentoo on PowerPC? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried the X86 version, but the PPC version had outdated, buggy, packages by comparison to Sid.

    The LiveCD is great; Gentoo-like, but without X on startup. I keep a copy handy for when MacOS overwrites my bootloader.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:Gentoo on PowerPC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That is because the packages are build against the *stable* ppc tree instead of the unstable tree :-). Unstable has kde-3.1.3 et al, just set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS to ~ppc

    2. Re:Gentoo on PowerPC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running ~ppc here on a TiBook - no problems to speak of.

    3. Re:Gentoo on PowerPC? by axxackall · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That is because the packages are build against the *stable* ppc tree instead of the unstable tree :-). Unstable has kde-3.1.3 et al, just set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS to ~ppc

      Then the original poster's point can be re-expressed this way: the stable tree of PPC is far behind the stable tree of x86.

      the unstable PPC tree is even more unstable than the unstable x86 one. I've played enough with all of them and I know what I am talking about.

      The problem with PPC tree is a lack of developers having PPC in hands. You know, x86 is still dominating, even in Linux world.

      --

      Less is more !
    4. Re:Gentoo on PowerPC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too play with both (as do several friends), and I can honestly say the present ~ppc is anything but unstable.

      The only "problem area" I'm aware of is lm_sensors support.

  20. The number on reason for using Gentoo... by Dante333 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its a great learning exprience. I learned more about linux installing gentoo (way back in the old days when it was still using gcc 2.95) than using Red Hat for a year. It may take a while to install and update, but it does teach you whats what on a linux system. That and portage just rocks. There is even a NWN ebuild

    1. Re:The number on reason for using Gentoo... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Its a great learning exprience.

      BZZZT. Wrong!

      If your mission is to learn about linux, you can't go wrong with Linux From Scratch. It explains how to compile everything yourself, with easy step-by-step instructions. None of this silly hand-holding that you get with portage/emerge.

      LFS for learning, Gentoo for portage.

  21. Here's the thing... by sethadam1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Use Gentoo all you want. But Gentoo is *bleeding edge*. I don't know a single sysadmin who uses Gentoo on their servers. Further, I don't know a single one who WOULD use Gentoo on their servers.

    Gentoo is a project, a hobby, a desktop OS. It's a fantastic product, don't get me wrong, but it's just not getting into the professional world, and even the die hards I know acknowledge that. Whereas Debian is definitely used by many in the server room, my perception is that Gentoo hasn't crossed that line yet. RH, SuSE, Conectiva, and a few others seem to have that area locked up (for now).

    1. Re:Here's the thing... by RealityShunt · · Score: 0

      "t's a fantastic product, don't get me wrong, but it's just not getting into the professional world"

      Not yet, no. But it will.

      realityshunt

      --
      Democracy is susceptible to being led astray by having scapegoats paraded in front of the electorate.
    2. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm using it on at least 15 production servers as we speak. Alpha, SPARC, PPC, and x86.

    3. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you lose. NO ONE runs SPARC linux on production servers. If you are really doing that, you deserve to be fired immediately.

    4. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have gentoo on three machines in my office including our file server. Thought Debian is still our distro of choice for our production servers.

    5. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, because if he's posting AC he's automatically lying... right.
      # uptime
      21:57:29 up 11 days, 10:00, 1 user, load average: 1.13, 0.35, 0.11
      # uname -a
      Linux catena 2.4.21-sparc-r0 #1 Sat Jul 19 13:35:38 MDT 2003 sparc64 sun4u TI UltraSparc IIi GNU/Linux


      Working just fine here!
    6. Re:Here's the thing... by silvwolf · · Score: 0, Troll

      I suggest a brief look around the Gentoo forums.. You'll find a number of people using Gentoo on production servers.

    7. Re:Here's the thing... by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      dear troll,

      Gentoo is only bleeding edge if you use bleeding edge software.
      Just like any other GNU/Linux that you install a bunch of bleeding edge software on.
      If you use nothing but stable packages, that YOU know are stable, what the hell is the problem? The "magic Gentoo application" running under everything makes it bleeding edge? Have you ever used a GNU/Linux distro before? It's not like something is being hidden from you. Gentoo just makes a few things easier in a way that a lot of people are really enjoying. If you don't have the competence to configure and lock down GNU/Linux, and you require some special agreement with a big company distro like Red Hat, maybe you should learn a little more about GNU/Linux before deploying ANY distro. Of course I'd rather you stick to some GNU/Linux distro to run your pretty purple servers that some slick salesman made you feel all warm and fuzzy about, but only a newbie would spout off about what distros are being used and be SO wrong.

      So how is Gentoo a Hobby and just a Desktop OS? What software makes it such? And what is so unstable and unpredictable and unreliable about it? Or whatever the problem is that you are focused on.

      thanks

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    8. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some junk in your basement != production server.

    9. Re:Here's the thing... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      I use Gentoo on a number of production-environment systems, including systems used for training as well as my network's firewall system. Gentoo is EXTREMELY fast and stable and works very well.

      My only caveat about Gentoo is that it lacks the clear security backport update system that Red Hat and Debian do. Some backports are made available in Gentoo but some aren't -- instead you just upgrade to a fixed version. If you are absolutely adamant about keeping your software at the same version, Gentoo may not be for you.

      I considered using Debian for the firewall, but because of the heavy CPU loads it has to undergo, I picked Gentoo instead for its optimized compiles. It has performed like a good little soldier ever since.

    10. Re:Here's the thing... by caluml · · Score: 1

      calum@falstaff:~$ uname -a ; uptime
      Linux falstaff 2.4.18 #2 Thu Apr 11 14:37:17 EDT 2002 sparc64 unknown
      07:03:59 up 242 days, 18:24, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.05, 0.01
      calum@falstaff:~$

    11. Re:Here's the thing... by quigonn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gentoo is only a hobby distribution, simply because companies cannot afford recompiling Gentoo for 2 days. Face it, this takes quite a lot of time, and time is money. That's business. That's why my company only deploys Debian and RedHat installations, simply because they're done quickly. No customer wants to pay 960 euros for a Linux installation, but 120 euros (given that one hour of work costs 60 euros, that's what we charge to most customers) are still OK. That's business.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    12. Re:Here's the thing... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Gentoo is only a hobby distribution, simply because companies cannot afford recompiling Gentoo for 2 days.

      I must respectfully but strongly disagree.

      First, Gentoo is not so much a distribution, as a set of very powerful programs and scripts that you use to build your own "distribution," customized however you like.

      This only needs to be done once (per organization, not per machine), and you end up with a distribution that is completely your own, customized to your company's needs, optimized for whatever CPU architecture(s) you have the most of, and free from the stupid linking and dependency hell problems that continue to plague binary distributions, especially if you have to build software that isn't already part of them.

      You get to use whatever versions of software you choose, not what a distribution maintainer has chosen for you.

      The process takes hours, not days, except for very large programs like KDE, Mozilla and OpenOffice, and there are binary packages for these. But you will want to spend time testing any distribution, and it will be much more than 2 days, and the time needed to compile even the largest programs is pretty insignificant by comparison.

      Face it, this takes quite a lot of time, and time is money. That's business.

      And that is exactly why I chose Gentoo, even though my time is very valuable (and was even more valuable at the time). I wanted a Linux distro that worked the way I thought it should, and no commercial distro does this (and not Debian either, though it and Slack probably come closest). I knew that the small amount of time I'd invest up front would be more than repaid down the road, as I'd have a clean, up-to-date system that would practically maintain itself, but according to my own preferences.

    13. Re:Here's the thing... by I+Have+No+Moose · · Score: 1

      I don't know a single sysadmin who uses Gentoo on their servers. Further, I don't know a single one who WOULD use Gentoo on their servers.

      You do now.

      --
      Freedom is still the most radical idea of all.
    14. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Junk? He doesn't say what MHz that system is, but I'm quite certain that box would make a decent server in _many_ instances.

      Go back into your hole.

    15. Re:Here's the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. We have fast build servers here for nearly every architecture. We deploy machines every day, and we couldn't be happier (more productive) with another distro.

    16. Re:Here's the thing... by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of binary packages?
      It takes 0 days to compile packages that are already compiled.

      So what about things that you need to install that there aren't any available binaries for? Well, even RedHat and Debian and whatever else has to compile software that isn't in binary form.

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    17. Re:Here's the thing... by quigonn · · Score: 1

      So, what's the advantage of Gentoo then. When using binary package, Gentoo is yet another distribution.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    18. Re:Here's the thing... by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      The point was, it doesn't take DAYS to get up. Nothing to do with whether or not it's just another distro.

      However, if you must get it up and running as fast as possible, use the binaries. Then when you have time, compile it.

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
  22. Too soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm still compiling the last version!

    1. Re:Too soon! by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Too soon! I'm still compiling the last version

      Time to upgrade that PDP-10

  23. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentoo uses it's very own system called Portage. It downloads the sources and compile them for you, and fix dependencies. It's by far, in my opinion, the best of them all, except that making a full install from stage one and getting a fully-functional work environment will take you a few days.

  24. Gentoonites by Raven-sama · · Score: 1

    I've used Gentoo on and off for about a year now. It's IMHO one of the best distros available if you can spare the time waiting for software to compile :) Anyone who says 'well sure it can do this but distro xxx does it better!' obviously never used Gentoo as if distro xxx does it better, then just change it yourself! Someone mentioned how it's not for n00bs, however assuming you don't run into any problems, it's not really that hard to set up, and the forums are a great source of help for anyone who gets stuck. Anyway, gotta go, my girlfriend is away for the week so she won't yell at me for hogging the compy to compile 1.4! :)

  25. I'm confused... by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

    The torrents have been slashdotted, but my download is going slow. What gives?

    1. Re:I'm confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try ftp://ftp.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo/releases/ x86/1.4/livecd/i686

      Getting over 400 kb/s from them currently....

    2. Re:I'm confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here, try this link:
      http://dev.gentoo.org/~luke-jr/torrent/gent oo-1.4/

  26. Gentoo Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a gentoo user, but I'm nearly gone sick with the amount of newbies finding gentoo and trolling all over slashdot. Not a single story goes by without fanatical trolling from gentoo idiots.

    Recently at my LUG meeting I was even too ashamed to mention gentoo when 2 other guys came up and talked about all the free distros and then mentioned how much newbies and idiots generaly prefer gentoo.

    1. Re:Gentoo Trolls by lightcycle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd have to agree, but add that there also is a fair amount of anti-gentoo trolling in connection with every gentoo related story on /.
      Gentoo has strong and weak points, just as every other distro, and just as every other distro it isn't for everyone. This gentoo/anti-gentoo trolling is counterproductive as well as ashaming to every serious linux user, and I would like to see the discussion hitched up just a few notches above the sandbox level it's currently at. If we could do that, a balanced discussion might help users find the distribution best suited to their needs. After all, having choices will only benefit linux.
      Oh well, end rant...

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    2. Re:Gentoo Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How thoughtful! Not only do you warn us of Gentoo trolls, you provide an illustrative example. You rawk!

    3. Re:Gentoo Trolls by Gherald · · Score: 0, Troll

      Someone please just add "gentoo" to the fscking lameness filter!

    4. Re:Gentoo Trolls by Monty67 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well Spoken. One only has to visit Distrowatch to see that there is a distro for (any)everyone's needs.

      Personally I looked into it along with a number of others. Installation time was a major factor for me so I ended up with VectorLinux. For me, that was
      -my- best choice, for others, another distro.

  27. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    "Gentoo uses it's very own system called Portage. It downloads the sources and compile them for you, and fix dependencies. It's by far, in my opinion, the best of them all, except that making a full install from stage one and getting a fully-functional work environment will take you a few days."

    Interesting... I'll have to try it out on a spare partition and see how that goes.

    All my Linux experience is with RPM based distros (Redhat, Mandrake), but I REALLY have wanted to try a Debian based one for the flexibility APT gives you. The only problem is, Debian isn't very cutting edge (not a bad thing, it's just a very conservative distro), and the other Debian based distros are basically commercial...

    RPM's and dependencies suck... I don't know how many times I've gone to install a RPM only go get into a "go get this RPM first, then go get THIS one first before you can install THAT RPM..." clusterfuck...

    I wish Redhat would do something about this, or switch to APT... It's the only major flaw in their distro.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  28. Anyone tried -Os? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was just about to do a second Gentoo install when I read this, and now it's cemented. Now, to choose CFLAGS. I have a 2.4 GHz system, but only a 7200 RPM HD, so I'm thinking of using -Os. I'm hoping this will improve load times for big apps, and I've heard it also allows better cache usage. So, has anyone done a -Os system, and would they recommend it?

    I was going to benchmark this by loading OpenOffice before and after compiling it with -Os. On a cold boot, the -O2 load time was 12 seconds, and 3 when it was in cache. So I re-emerged, and I ran out of space! OpenOffice takes over 1.6 GB to compile! Perhaps lack of -Os isn't the problem.

    1. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by Arker · · Score: 1

      So free up some disk space and let us know your results.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by Junta · · Score: 1

      I use -Os on my laptop with 128 MB RAM, and it has been a lifesaver in avoiding swap. On a laptop hard drive at 4200 RPM, swap is too painful to endure. It does significantly shave quite a bit off of the size of applications. But if you have plenty of memory and you are trying to reduce program load times, I don't think -Os will buy you much. The difference is at best 2-3 MB of difference on large programs. That 2-3 MB is rather trivial even on a 5400 RPM drive.

      Of course, your drive RPM should have little to do with a good deal of load time unless your filesystem has really scattered things about, and there is a lot of seeking involved.

      Of course, my final question is, assuming you are in the world of IDE, why do you call 7200 RPM slow?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by pantherace · · Score: 1
      Yes, I use it on my p2-300 (160MB RAM)laptop system, it runs very snappy. I generally use KDE on it and it's great. (Reminds me of a faster RedHat system or a Much faster Windows system.)

      I am now in the process of building everything with it (O3 does little more than -finline-functions, (and I other thng I can't recall over the top of my head) over O2, and Os is O2 minus a few that bloat code size, and some optimizations to make it smaller. Which means less cache misses hopefully, and possibly faster. (It certainly feels faster than a p2-400 I have used with O3)

    4. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      So, has anyone done a -Os system, and would they recommend it?

      I'm currently trying to install something - anything - on a 486/50 with 12MB of RAM and a 10GB drive. In this one particular context, optimizing for space would probably see some real results. Otherwise, nah, I wouldn't mess with it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by CaptainPhong · · Score: 1

      You might want to look at UPX (there's an ebuild for it). It'll give you smaller executable sizes than -Os. Also, you'll still be able to use -O3 so you get the speed enhancements that entails. However, since UPX decompresses on program load (more quickly than loading the uncompressed executable), you don't get the in memory savings of -Os.

      Also, on average, -Os apps will be faster than -O1, but slower than -O2.

      --
      ... "Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the w
    6. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I've got a piii dell latitude with an 18gb hd, after a just in case windows partition, I've got 15g left. Currently I've got debian on it, but I'd love to put gentoo on it. But it seems to me that gentoo is quite a bit bigger than debian. In debian I can get away without all the -dev packages, and portage seems to leave a lot of stuff lying around. Does anyone have any pointers on keeping disk space used by the system small?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Anyone tried -Os? by pantherace · · Score: 1
      I have gentoo on a laptop with a 5GB hd (p2-300) I have a 3.5GB / (some tiny /boot, and storage partition) of / only 3.1GB are used (home accounts for 200-300MB, (though it probably should be on a seperate partition.)

      portage leaves stuff lying around, but in constant places. /usr/portage/distfiles stores downloaded source packages, and /var/tmp/portage stores the build directories. if you don't care to have that laying around just do (rm -f /usr/portage/distfiles (-r is not a good idea as there is a cvs-src dir under there) and rm -rf /var/tmp/portage/*. This will free up some space (doing this on my laptop takes the usage down to 2.9GB)

      Admittedly you will have the "-dev" stuff around, but just headers and such mostly, and by using USE flags, you should be able to eliminate any dependancies you don't need (for example: ldap, cups, samba, etc)

      All depends on how you configure it (that goes for any distro, but gentoo is easier to configure than most in my experence)

  29. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by xchino · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is based on neither. Gentoo uses (and basically IS) a packaging system called portage, which is similar to FreeBSD's ports. It is the nicest package management suite I have seen within Linux. All dependencies are handled for you, and optional support can be defined through a USE variable. Say if you want php but don't want support for gd or java, you could set the USE variable to -gd and -java, and then simply "# emerge php" and all patches, dependencies and options are retreived, configured, and compiled for you with one command, based on what you want your system to be. Aside from an install not designed for newbies or the lazy, gentoo is IMHO the easiest distro to use and maintain, perhaps even for newbies, once installed.

    To me the optimization is secondary to the amazing package management system, and the fact that it stays out of my way and let's me decide what I want my system to be.

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  30. Re:Great release MOD WAY DOWN by loginx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Says the Anonymous Coward...

  31. gentoo topic by quannump · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is it too much to ask for gentoo to get its on topic category? its got a pretty cool logo. jeez even turbolinux has one.

    --

    1. Re:gentoo topic by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      Yeah good idea.. just as long as they don't use that bloody cow logo..

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    2. Re:gentoo topic by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Funny

      is it too much to ask for gentoo to get its on topic category?

      This is Gentoo; you're supposed to download the vectors and compile your own logo on each box where you want to see it.

  32. but what about my SCO license by heff · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If i've already purchased my SCO license, will I need to purchase another one to download and compile this? Or is the license I have more like a "blanket" license?

    just gotta make sure before I start breaking laws.

    --

    --

    |-_-| . o O ( bEef!)

    1. Re:but what about my SCO license by soleblaze · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the sco license if for linux binary packages only.. but it doesn't stop you from bribing that rebel friend of you whose always breaking the law to compile everything for you

  33. You want to know what I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you have no life.

  34. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    How bad is the installer? I must dual boot with Windows at work... How hard is it to install in that configuration?

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  35. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Debian packages are .deb's, like the Redhat packages are .rpm's. apt runs on top of the package manager to handle the dependencies. You can get apt for rpm from a number of different places (freshrpms, jpackage, fedora, etc.)

  36. Why I like Gentoo by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

    The combination of the BSD and Debian package tools works really well in Gentoo and so far I love being able to install and play with newer software. All in all I give it a thumbs up since the online documentation is excellent and will answer most, if not all of my installation questions.

  37. netless install? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I never paid much attention to Gentoo because I figured you have to have a T3 to get all the software. Does this mean you can do builds from the CD? I just might have to try it out then!!

    I'm a FreeBSD lover these days (thought I at home I use Red Hat and OS X) and the ports collection is a great concept. It sounds like I'd love Gentoo.

    1. Re:netless install? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      128/128 ADSL will do JUST fine for gentoo.

  38. Call me crazy by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    but I do, its a small network, but Gentoo has worked with hardware that failed with Mandrake. Probably a direct result of a correct make.conf file and proper compiler settings. ROCK SOLID and STABLE for MONTHS!.

    And yes I'm a Gentoo biggot.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  39. Question for parent author by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

    Haven't you tried any other modern distributions? Debian comes to mind with apt-get. In fact, I've had more luck upgrading Debian than I have had with Gentoo lately. Specifically, be careful if you unmask a package like transcode - it makes emerge -u world have a fit...

    1. Re:Question for parent author by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I have to agree. Portage is like a race track or a Mosh pit. Never turn your back on it. I've had to manually intervene a couple of times on some basic upgrades.

      But hey I'm just going to invoke the "Apple Jacks" principle, and state psychotically that I "Just like it."

      (For those who don't live in the US, Apple Jacks is a breakfast food that doesn't contain any apples whatsoever. Every commercial an adult asks a bunch of kids why they like it, and their reply is always like a cult member "We just do...")

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  40. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by soleblaze · · Score: 3, Informative

    Installing Gentoo is pretty much just typing in a laundry list of commands. (see the Gentoo x86 in guide to see what I mean)

    You also have to edit some of the configuration files, but I think the documentation explains it pretty well.

  41. Debian *is* very recent, while still stable by The+Revolutionary · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I don't want to take anything away from the Gentoo project, as it obviously satisfies a need or interest in the community, but I am sick and tired of the untrue stereotype being propogated that Debian is not recent.

    If you bother to read the documentation, just barely, even the simplest overviews on the Debian website, you would know that you can also use Debian testing and unstable; you are not limited to stable.

    (Yes, sometimes it is appropriate to limit yourself to stable, and when you do, what you get is a system that is very stable, and very closely scrutinized for bugs; look at Debian's own bug-tracking system even).

    I am running: GNOME 2.2, Firebird 0.6 / Mozilla 1.4 / Epiphany 0.8, Nautilus 2.2.4, GIMP 1.3.17, OpenOffice.org 1.1, Abiword 1.99.2, Evolution 1.4.3, Gnumeric 1.1.19, XFree86 4.2.1, etc.

    No this isn't "cutting edge" if you consider cutting edge to be following development branches and cvs snapshots. Of course not, but I don't want that.

    Within reason, it is very recent, and it is stable; as stable as the upstream source, which is all that you can expect from any distribution.

    My base system is almost entirely out of Debian stable. The rest of the system is out of testing/unstable only as required to satisfy the dependency versions for these applications.

    I have never had the state of my installed packages corrupted by using testing/stable.

    There is probably a better way, but this is enough for me (please post if you have an even easier way, as I'd love to know):

    "apt-get update" to update the package information from the repositoriees.

    "apt-get -u upgrade"
    "n" to see the packages available for upgrade from all repositories.

    "apt-get -u install x" to upgrade package "x".

    I could just answer yes to "apt-get -u upgrade", yes, and I recommend others to do this if they don't want to be bothered further, but I prefer to make the decision each time when I want to keep a package from stable instead of testing or unstable.

    1. Re:Debian *is* very recent, while still stable by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      What I like about Gentoo though is that it makes it easy to mix stable and unstable packages. For instance if I absolutely must have the latest version of something, I can type "ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge blah" and automatically get the bleeding-edge version of blah, without affecting the rest of my system (unless something else compiles against blah).

      Also Gentoo "stable" is a little different from Debian "stable" and RedHat-release-"stable". Gentoo "stable" still updates to recent versions of stuff, but only ones that have been tested heavily already to work properly in the Gentoo environment and be relatively bug-free. In other words on a Gentoo stable system if I do a global update, it will grab new versions of things, just not the bleeding-edge versions.

    2. Re:Debian *is* very recent, while still stable by ThyTurkeyIsDone · · Score: 1

      I am running: GNOME 2.2, Firebird 0.6 / Mozilla 1.4 / Epiphany 0.8, Nautilus 2.2.4,...

      My base system is almost entirely out of Debian stable. The rest of the system is out of testing/unstable only as required to satisfy the dependency versions for these applications.

      That sounds a bit fishy. If you're running Mozilla 1.4 etc., then you must be using much more recent versions of core packages like glibc than the ones in stable (unless of course all of those recent applications are unofficial backports). What that means is that for all intents and purposes, you are running testing or unstable, and might as well update the rest of your system. (Pure unstable is probably cleaner and more hassle-free than a wild mix of all three branches.)

  42. Obvious flamebait by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Okay, I see how having a system entirely tailored and compiled for my own system is great, sorta. Aren't there thousands of other people using AMD Athlon processors? Why should I have to compile a binary that everyone else has already got on their Athlon? I can see having several versions of the binary to cope with INTEL/AMD discrepancies but how much optimisation is really done with a custom compile?

    1. Re:Obvious flamebait by omega9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The biggest advantage of (the option of) compiling on your own box is customization of the package, which far outweighs the speedup from being a local build job. For instance, say you want to install a package that has four USE flags. They are all mutually exclusive and each calls it's own dependancy. In Gentoo, you're able to build that package with only the options and dependancies you desire, possibly none (single package, no USE settings). In a binary distro you would have to offer 16 (2^N where N=number of USE flags) different packages and still have to worry about deps.

      While I believe there is a genuine advantage to compiling on you own hardware, I also believe people incorrectly prioritize it above the level of potential customization.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    2. Re:Obvious flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - Far too much emphasis is placed on the 'optimization' you get from compiling your own binaries. Sure that draws a lot of people in, in fact it was one of the reasons I wanted to try it out.. But what keeps people using Gentoo is the customizability that Portage provides.

    3. Re:Obvious flamebait by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *While I believe there is a genuine advantage to compiling on you own hardware*

      now that's just stupid, is it genuine advantage that instead of one compile(by the developer, or package maker), 100 000 compiles happen on user machines? not really.

      the platform that does the compiling doesn't affect the outcome of that compile, you could compile them on any platform the compiler runs on and get the same end product, there's nothing inherently good about compiling it on your own machine (apart from customizations that are _VERY_ often TOTALLY UNNECESSARY, you can throw any flags you want at it but it doesn't mean that it does anything with them, nor do the -O flags always mean much more than coolnes, it's like this gentoo troll that said that removing ps/2 support from mozilla helps quite a bit, mozilla doesn't speak to ps/2 itself anyways though).

      the portage system is very handy though, for easy installing. however the biggest advantages of it(individual compiles) fail on the low end computers where they would be most of use, it's very hard to keep a computer up to date (and usable at the same time) if the compiles take days, which they could with p200-k6-2-400mhz range of hardware, not to mention totally impossible with the low space available on many of these machines(on computers where it would be of advantage to have many options to limit many dependencies you don't have the space to compile everything anyways). the kernel is compiled locally usually on all other distros too(or the possibility at least).

      gentoo is still a newcomer, the very much hyped kid on the block (the biggest advantages of gentoo have been available on other distros for years). the biggest gist in the linux community against it is the over hyping by (newbie)users, yeah i do realise that many 'oldies' like it too and it has potential, but it's just frustrating to see hyping thats right up there with urban legends (that resemble infomercials at points). there's reason these like it too, gentoo aims at the casual from windows switcher(with games and all) rather than the usual developer or office-programs users that the other distros aim for.

      oh yeah, i don't even have a linux machine currently, just bsd firewall, win2k gaming machine and a beos irc/mp3 box. i do use one for my email but that's not mine and runs slackware. however knowing the power of debians apt-get and the ease of use it gave i can really understand why people not knowing it(or other similar tools) think portage is the best thing after sex.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Obvious flamebait by omega9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the sake of completeness, my original remark was "While I believe there is a genuine advantage to compiling on you own hardware, I also believe people incorrectly prioritize it above the level of potential customization.". This is important for the fact that I was agreeing that the advantage gained by building locally is often incorrectly billed as the greatest feature of Gentoo.

      The attraction to building packages locally comes from the amount of customization available to you. Personally, I enjoy having that level of customization available. We can argue all day about how much CFLAGS can actually impact software performance, but you missed my greater point before and I'm afraid you might miss it again so we'll leave it alone. Interestingly enough, you have a very defined dislike for trolls, but you exhibit the overuse of capital letters, the attitude that your opinion is the only opinion, and site constant misinformation.

      It's my observation that Gentoo users in general prefer it for the ease of keeping the system up to date and the amount that it can be personalized in the process. In the same vein, Gentoo is not dissimilar from LFS, a distro that also requires building packages locally. If the issue you take is one of local builds then you would be better off taking issue against the entire genre of source based distrobutions as Gentoo is not entirely unique in that regard. If your issue is with it's popularity, then perhaps it's worth it to reexamine the fact that a source based disto is in fact that popular right now.

      "the portage system is very handy though, for easy installing. however the biggest advantages of it(individual compiles) fail on the low end computers where they would be most of use"

      The remark "however the biggest advantages of it(individual compiles)" would lend itself to admit that there are actual advantages of individual compiles, just that they're being lost on lower end hardware. If there are, in fact, advantages to individual compiles then I suggest rethinking your arguements against custom CFLAGS, etc. . Also, I'm aware of at least on person who has completed a successful install on a P133, though doing so was for entertaining/educational reasons. I would agree that Gentoo is not the best suited distrobution to use on such hardware, but it is possible if you have strong enough reasons.

      "(the biggest advantages of gentoo have been available on other distros for years). the biggest gist in the linux community against it is the over hyping by (newbie)users"

      I would argue that if the biggest advantages of Gentoo have always been available, then Gentoo would not be nearly as popular as it is today. It's true that Debian's apt system is a stunning package manager, and ports have been around on FreeBSD for years, but the biggest advantage of Gentoo is not any individual component, but the way they function and are tied together. Maybe what you perceive as over hyping is just the general noise created by a user community excited about a distro they like. Gentoo wouldn't be the first distro to have users with a common aura or excitement (ex. Debian).

      "oh yeah, i don't even have a linux machine currently..."

      I may be wrong, but now it seems like you most likely haven't spent any time on a Gentoo machine and all your points are purely academic.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  43. Easy Slashdot karma formula by WalterDGeranios · · Score: 5, Funny
    OK, feel free to mod me down now.

    Step 1: Make a comment.

    Step 2: Type "I know everyone is going to mod me down" or "OK, mod me down everyone."

    Step 3: Those tricksy Slashdot readers outwit you and mod you up!.

    1. Re:Easy Slashdot karma formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 4: ???
      Step 5: Profit!

    2. Re:Easy Slashdot karma formula by ceeam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Eh.... May I try?...

      Ok, Mod me down everyone!

    3. Re:Easy Slashdot karma formula by luisdom · · Score: 1

      New slashdot moderation option: "-1, Obedient Moderator"

  44. A production server by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

    This is a look at my preparation for upgrade to Gentoo 1.4 final on a production, connected to the internet and dealing with secure data server. Are we running bleeding edge packages? A few. Is is stable and fast? You bet it is. I also have redhat systems in the same configurations. Those of us that are using Gentoo aren't stupid or naive, just experienced and willing to push some boundaries for a good idea.

    xxxserver root # emerge -uDp world

    These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

    Calculating world dependencies ...done!
    [ebuild U ] sys-devel/patch-2.5.9 [2.5.4-r5]
    [ebuild U ] sys-devel/libtool-1.4.3-r1 [1.4.1-r10]
    [ebuild U ] sys-apps/groff-1.18.1-r3 [1.18.1-r2]
    [ebuild U ] sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.19-r1 [2.4.19]
    [ebuild U ] sys-devel/automake-1.7.5-r2 [1.7.2]
    [ebuild U ] sys-apps/psmisc-21.2-r3 [21.2-r2]
    [ebuild U ] net-analyzer/nmap-3.30 [3.27-r1]

    We examine the proposed updates for any known issues and when we are satisfied with testing, finalize the updates to production. Gee, that is the same procedure I use with redhat too. Whooda thunk that?

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  45. OT SCO: Re:Great release by Sancho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I seem to recall SCO claiming that since the code was introduced so long ago, it has contaminated every build since. While the contributing code was perhaps localized at first, it's impossible to know how the code /around/ it would have evolved had their IP never been introduced. All of Linux from that point on is tainted by their code, and thus is their IP.

    I have not seen the code in question, and I certainly hope that MicroSCOft loses this battle, but should they win, I could really see this claim as having some weight. Linux evolves, and parts of the kernel interact with other parts. You could, for example, take concepts from their code and use those concepts in the single-processor scheduler. It's impossible to know how far the taint has spread since the code was out there for anyone to read. It's fairly safe to localize it to Linux, though, and since this is actually just a money grab, it makes sense. And the logic behind it is fairly sound (as much as I hate to admit it).

  46. Reverse dependencies by normalperson · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Is unmerging a package safe yet?


    Do packages that depend on the package I'm unmerging also get unmerged automatically or do they stay installed (and broken?)


    Of course, I tend to like to try out new software on a whim a lot and frequently install something to use for a few hours before I decide whether or not it's worth keeping on my system (usually not).

    1. Re:Reverse dependencies by Omicron32 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, unmerging individual packages is generally safe, but it won't warn you if you're about to unmerge a dependancy for something.

      If you install a program you don't want, you can just check /var/log/emerge.log for the last stuff you emerged in, and emerge it all out (the package, and it's deps).

      Of course, if you're 'ard enough, you could always try using --depclean. ;)

    2. Re:Reverse dependencies by axxackall · · Score: 1
      Yeah, unmerging individual packages is generally safe, but it won't warn you if you're about to unmerge a dependancy for something.

      Then it's not safe.

      --

      Less is more !
    3. Re:Reverse dependencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # emerge world

      Will put any missing dependency back in.

      # revdep-rebuild

      Will fix it if dynamic links are broken.

      # etcat depends {package name you want to unmerge}

      Will tell you what you might break. Write a small shell script around this so that it only reports the installed dependencies of packages if you want.

      I would say that Gentoo isn't safe for people who don't know what they are doing.

  47. Best song ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Artist : Bad Religion
    Song : I Love My Computer

    I love my computer you make me feel alright
    Every waking hour and every lonely night
    I love my computer for all you give to me
    Predictable errors and no identity

    And it's never been quite so easy
    I've never been quite so happy

    (Chorus)
    All I need to do is click on you and we'll be joined in the most soul-less way
    And we'll never ever ruin each other's day 'cuz when I'm through I just click
    And you just go away

    I love my computer you're always in the mood
    I get turned on when I turn on you
    I love my computer you never ask for more
    You can be a princess or you can be my whore

    And it's never been quite so easy
    I've never been quite so happy

    (Chorus)

    (Bridge)
    The world outside is so big but it's safe in my domain
    Because to you I'm just a number and a clever screen name

    All I need to do is click on you and we'll be together for eternity
    And no one is ever gonna take my love from me because I've got security,
    Her password and a key

  48. Gentoo 1.4 FINAL?!? OMG.. I think I'm gonna faint by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    I remember when 1.2 was out and everyone was getting 1.3 together (development). Everyone wanted to know what was going on, etc. After a while, 1.3 was going on forever, extending into new realms, etc...
    Man, it feels like 1.4 lasted nearly forever in the development cycle.. 1.4rc1, 1.4rc2, 1.4rc3,4,5,6,7,8.... lol I know it wasn't that many, but man.
    I'm sitting here thinking, "wow... it's out... it's finally out" and all of this time I've been essentially running it :P (emerge -u world)

    So. to put this to a closing... "Oh my dear god, Gentoo 1.4 FINAL is out!! Pop open the keg and lets finish it off, cuz now we can start complaining about 1.5 not being done! wooohooo!" :)

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  49. Gentoo Stable by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

    Have a look at this: http://stable.gentoo.org/

    They are addressing the very issue you brought up with this new "flavor" of Gentoo.

    Not sure how successful they are at this time, though.

  50. Re:OT SCO: Re:Great release by eggnet · · Score: 1

    That's all well and good, but a copyright is not a patent. It's ok to take ideas from copyrighted works.

  51. BitTorrent Files for Slashdot Effect Victims by mnemon1c · · Score: 1

    torrent files are located here: f.scarywater.net/

    --
    Ah, the last peanut -- overflowing with the oil and salt of its departed brothers. -Homer
    1. Re:BitTorrent Files for Slashdot Effect Victims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are the same as linked from the story, although with stats ...

  52. Oh Please... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While the contributing code was perhaps localized at first, it's impossible to know how the code /around/ it would have evolved had their IP never been introduced. All of Linux from that point on is tainted by their code, and thus is their IP.

    That's about as realistic as the MS programming monkey that once copy-pasted two lines of Linux 0.01 into Windows would now make all of Windows the IP of Mr. Linus.

    Derivative works are more than just inspiration, I can't create a story in the Star Wars universe but I can certainly make one in a *different* galaxy far far away. It's not like any other story involving being in another galaxy would be "tainted" and the IP of George Lucas, just because I saw the movie.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  53. What You Said! by Mooncaller · · Score: 1

    I wish people would READ the comment they are flaming. It would also be nice if moderators would think befor they give points. Modding up an illogical post is even more illogical.

  54. Already? by spudchucker · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm still building 1.3

  55. Love Gentoo!! by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    Its the only Linux distro that I could get to work.. every time..
    It is teaching me HEAPS by being very easy to use, and extremly configurable at the same time..
    I can "emerge" a feature or application.. play around with it.. screw it up ... and when I can't fix it, unemerge it and re-emerge it without hurting my system one iota!

    I love the forum and IRC chat guys.. they are soooo friendly and helpfull totally unlike my experiances with the mandrake, redhat etc crowds..

    It's also a freaking EXCELLENT gaming platform :-)

    Yyay for Gentoo!

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  56. WineX by dakryx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else hear about how Transgaming forced gentoo to stop having ebuilds of their source? Transgaming said gentoo was making it trivial to install from gentoo. All in the pursuit of profit eh?

    1. Re:WineX by nagora · · Score: 3, Informative
      Anyone else hear about how Transgaming forced gentoo to stop having ebuilds of their source?

      To be fair, the ebuild was installing from the CVS tree which was provided for the use of developers, not for massive numbers of downloads.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:WineX by Drakon86 · · Score: 1

      You see, their cvs release didn't include support for various copy protection schemes like SafeDisc and SecuROM. They were only included in binary packages which you couldn't redistribute.

    3. Re:WineX by nagora · · Score: 1
      They were only included in binary packages which you couldn't redistribute.

      I think I'll resort to Scottish law and find them "not proven"...

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:WineX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit!

      When Transgaming first released winex they took an approach that was more like 'the binaries are for people who wants to support us, have support, have rights to vote, and would be confused by having to compile the whole shebang from cvs".

      Oh yeah and they were supposed to give back their stuff to the wine project after a while. They didn't.

      In my book, Transgaming is evil.

      Well since the cvs is for developpers only, I'll act as joe-end-user and get the binary from p2p networks and install that.

  57. Available on BudgetinuxCDs.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This release is available on CD from BudgetLinuxCDs.com

  58. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    probably the reason every newbie troll here with an e-machine is using this lame distro. If i hear any more gentoo, i'm personally gonna kick thir asses

  59. Sorry, not as good as ANAL CUNT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Internet is Gay
    You've got no friends
    You stay home all day
    You've been to every website
    Because you're fucking gay

    The Internet is fucking gay
    You fucking faggot loser queer nerd

    You've got no friends
    You stay home all day
    You've been to every website
    Because you're fucking gay

    Technology is Gay
    How many megs of RAM do you have in your computer
    Technology's gay
    Hey, why don't you check out my website at www
    Technology's gay
    I love looking at the Star Trek website, and I eh
    Technology's gay
    Let me fax you my email address
    Technology's gay

    I Got An Office Job For The Sole Purpose Of Sexually Harassing Women
    If you work with me prepare to get harassed
    When you're standing at the copier, I'll pinch your ass
    I don't care if you're ugly, don't care if you're old
    You're still a woman and I want to make your life miserable

    I'm gonna make you quit because you're a woman

    I'm gonna spread rumors that you're easy
    I'm gonna threaten to rape you on your email
    I'm gonna leave a dildo at your desk
    So everyone can see it you stupid cunt

    I'm gonna make you quit becuase you're a woman
    I'm gonna make you quit you fucking cunt
    I'm gonna make you quit you fucking bitch
    I'm gonna make you quit you stupid cunt

  60. Converting from Redhat to Gentoo by caluml · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could I convert an existing Redhat server to Gentoo - without rebuilding from scratch? Can I not download "emerge" and start emerging system? Has anyone done it? How did it work? How to get rid of the "cruft"?

    I don't have a backup of that server, so I can't go for the wipe and rebuild - also, it is running a 24/7 e-commerce site.

    (Of course I have a backup.)

    1. Re:Converting from Redhat to Gentoo by tangent3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes you can.

      http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=8884
      h ttp://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=28559

      Enjoy! :)

    2. Re:Converting from Redhat to Gentoo by dotgain · · Score: 2, Informative
      Parent is informative, but just to add a bit to the discussion:

      About the easiest way to set Gentoo up is on a system with free space already up and running any other Linux system. You simply partition and format the space, and using your existing system download a stage1 and unpack it there.

      You then "chroot" into this new install (of course still running RedHat or whatever) using a terminal and being building your system, Gentoo's install docs are pretty good these days.

      One thing makes me wonder about Gentoo though, just how much redundant compilation is going on here - surely many people compile effectively identical binaries every day, it's not as if there's a million different instruction sets / archs / etc, and I wonder how much collective cpu time could be saved (read: not wasted) by using platform-specific binaries.

      You can say all you like about rpm, but installs of them are sometimes hours faster. But at the end of the day, the only thing I'd change about Gentoo is it's extensive use of Python, I think it's a slow dog. Bite me.

    3. Re:Converting from Redhat to Gentoo by prator · · Score: 1

      Damn you! I just got my fileserver running on RedHat, and I was going to leave it alone. Now I have to go try this. :P

      -prator

  61. I'M IMPRESSED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just installed it for the first time and I must say I'm really impressed! My Gentoo system seems to be a lot faster than the debian that I switched from. I'll stick to Gentoo! Documentation was also top notch - it covered everything very well!

  62. Re:Great release MOD WAY DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the Anonymous Coward did say that. Wow, you're smart for noticing that arn't you!

    Oh wait, you were trying to make some sort of point, wern't you? Well never mind.

  63. LiveCD for Apple PowerBook 17"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,
    I would like to try the Gentoo 1.4 LiveCD on my Apple PowerBook 17".

    What ISO files should I download and burn to CD?
    http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/distribut ions/ gentoo/releases/ppc/1.4/livecd/

    Thanks!

    1. Re:LiveCD for Apple PowerBook 17"? by Drakon86 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hello! You should download livecd-ppc-1.4.iso to get a bootstrap system. Then you may choose the GRP CDs for your appropriate architecture to get a wide range of precompiled packages. Sincerely, Alex

  64. Gentoo is young at hart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentoo is the most attractive distro for all ages. Teenagers seem to like it very much. Surely, other distros will need to invigorate their image if they wish to attract talented youngsters, but the Gentoo forum is flashy, fun, and most of all very friendly. I'll bet that the best of Gentoo is yet to come.

    1. Re:Gentoo is young at hart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly, who else can boast of a -SCO USE flag type feature?

    2. Re:Gentoo is young at hart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teenagers pergaps?

  65. TranS(CO)gaming by Drakon86 · · Score: 1

    Well... but their CVS still has all the ebuilds for WineX-Transgaming!. Anyway, Transgaming seems to be very lame^H^H^H^Hgamer-oriented, and installing their Winex distribution on a gentoo would be a simple matter of extracting the RPM, by rpm2cpio, rpm2targz of rpmoffset. Also, Transgaming doesn't distribute the source for their WineX modifications (as it seems to me they even didn't bother to add their "open" mods like d3dgl for 3.1 to sourceforge wineX CVS tree) And they surely do not distribute the binaries to everyone. However, I have been able to find available copies on the Net for every release. :) Gentoo does not mirror the WineX distribution on their distfiles mirrors, so I don't see anything wrong with them) If the rumour is real, then Transgaming really starts to suck.

    1. Re:TranS(CO)gaming by rosie_bhjp · · Score: 1

      FYI, Its not rumor, it was confirmed in the Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.

      Cheers,

      --
      A radio maverick jumps to internet only. The Future of Rock n Roll
  66. Re: You might want to try alternative methods by zr-rifle · · Score: 0

    Personally, I prefer installing a minimal, graphic Mandrake 9.1 system, using the install disk partitioner to setup the partitions required to install Gentoo to mount automatically at boot. Once I'm inside Mandrake, all I have to do is the following: 1) open up a console terminal 2) >mount -t proc proc /mnt/gentoo/proc 3) >cp /etc/resolv.conf /mnt/gentoo/etc/resolv.conf 4) >cd /mnt/gentoo 5) >chroot /mnt/gentoo bin/bash 6) >env-update 7) >source /etc/profile 8) download a stage tarball 9) start building 10) ???? 11) PROFIT!!! So I can browse the web, check my mail, play freeciv while my system builds on my machine. Beat this, Microsoft! More information ca be found here. Gentoo is basically Linux Lego. Just remember not to swallow the small plastic parts.

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
  67. the torrents kind of suck by oohp · · Score: 1

    I tried to download i686 stage3 iso from the torrent but it just plain sucks. It stopped at 6% an hour ago and doesn't start moving since. I even stopped it and tried getting the file again but no luck. Ahh, I guess stage3 just isn't that popular. Yea, I guess I'd be better off with an optimized ls(1) which would list files blazing fast, heh.

    1. Re:the torrents kind of suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always start with stage I. The fact that other distros have lobotomized most of use does not mean Gentoo needs to. Just start with stage I and get your freedom back.

  68. Red Hat will have yum by ultrabot · · Score: 1

    I wish Redhat would do something about this, or switch to APT... It's the only major flaw in their distro.

    Yum is in rawhide, and allegedly it is better and simpler than apt. Red Hat is switching to a more open model with RHLP (P is for Project), and yum is a good fit for that.

    --
    Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
  69. Now I really wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just _why_ ppl always take OpenOffice as an example for gentoo compiled stuff. I mean it's JAVA, shouldn't it have machine-independant bytecode? How could that possibly be optimized for your machine? (Aside from optimizing the VM itself).

    I always get the openoffice-bin ebuild. Now KDE, that's something I compile from source.

  70. Tried it, but ... by mbirk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was I the only one who dropped Gentoo when they went from 1.2 -> 1.3 and you couldn't do a simple "emerge -u world"? There was something like four manual update scripts to run. When that didn't work right off the bat, I decided to punt. Not that I couldn't have gotten it to work, but I was worried that this would happen with every major (or even minor) release.

    Emerging applications was sometimes flakey as well. I particularly recall having difficulty upgrading KDE.

    I was also occasionally frustrated with portage scripts lagging the latest tar balls (or not existing altogether), but of course that happens with every package system.

    I had always wished the USE variables would get set automatically, too. So that if I had, say, Postgres and TCL installed the --with-tcl configure option gets set without having to fiddle with the USE variable. That's a weak complaint, though, since that feature is pretty unique to Gentoo anyhow.

    Now I'm using Red Hat fairly happily. However I seem to spend a lot of time building custom RPMs to get the equivalent of Gentoo's USE. *sigh* Still, grabbing whole suites of packages from jpackage.org et al via apt-get is pretty sweet.

    Anyway, not trying to spread Gentoo FUD. With the amount of popularity and support Gentoo has going for it, I'm sure some or all of these issues have already been addressed, right? I'll have to check it out when I finally decide to cannabalize my Windows box! :-)

    1. Re:Tried it, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not the only one. I get the impression that gentoo's emerge was forced to grow too fast. I used to run it from one of the first releases, and after about three years errors came up when emerging, ofcourse they might have been fixable, probably very easy, but the best thing about portage was that it was a no-brainer for updates. Perhaps python is not the right choice for a packaging system.
      As events unfold with the fork of Gentoo called Zynot, I might get back to using it (or at least, the fork) since they managed to attract Geert Bevin, the main driving force behind a new version of Portage (called portage2, or Bagheera), written in C++. Geert left Gentoo some time ago because, amongst other things, he believed that in the long run Python would not be viable for a rock-solid packaging system.
      Gentoo is great, but emerge is not quite ready for the server I believe.

    2. Re:Tried it, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I just realised I don't live at my current place for Three years, so I must have the time wrong. Anyway, from Gentoo 1.1(?) and upwards, that should be :)

    3. Re:Tried it, but ... by aeoo · · Score: 1

      No, you're not the only one. Breaking compatibility caused me do stop using Gentoo, along with other issues.

    4. Re:Tried it, but ... by CaptainPhong · · Score: 1

      That was a pretty serious consternation at the time, but it was a pretty exceptional situation.

      The reason for the problem was because gcc >=3.1 broke ABI compatibility with gcc = 2.9x (for C++ at least IIRC). That means apps many compiled with gcc 3.x wouldn't work with shared libraries compiled with 2.9x and vice versa. That makes upgrading gcc then recompiling all those apps _in place_ extremely hairy.

      That doesn't even get into the list of apps that didn't compile with gcc 3 because they relied on some incompatable feature that got dropped.

      Now, the gcc folks say the C++ ABI now conforms to some sort of standard so they don't plan on breaking it again (we can hope.) The solution at the time was a bit ad hoc and certainly less than graceful, but it was probably a one-time situation. Even if it wasn't, there have been some improvements in portage that should prevent or reduce the problems with that sort of change. You can have multiple versions of gcc installed (it uses SLOTs now, though there are some other complexities behind the scenes to make that work). I've got both 3.2.3 and 3.3 out of the unstable branch installed right now, and I can toggle back and forth (with gcc-config) for things that don't yet work with 3.3.

      As a side note, I think the jokes about compile times have finally outlived both their humor value and relavence. You can use GRP to install almost as quickly as other distros. The really long compiles (OO, Mozilla, KDE, Gnome, Xfree, gcc) get updated pretty infrequently, and unless you've got a dog of a computer, most other updates only take a few minutes. On the long compiles, they can be done overnight or in the background. Your mp3s won't skip because xmms and its dependancies are one of the few things that actually benefit in a significant way from higher optimizations.

      --
      ... "Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the w
  71. To everyone above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This specifically to those of you who are running Gentoy on your production servers:

    I hope you are fired and replaced with a competent administrator.

    That is all.

  72. Don't you see an obvious contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since processor speed and RAM are becoming so plentiful, doesn't that *eliminate* any reason to compile specifically for your box and get that 0.5% performance boost? Why not just install a binary package? If your machine is fast enough to build something like OO.o in less than eternity, I doubt you will even notice a performance improvement, and it is an absolute certainty that any difference will not have any real-world significance. Can you imagine trying to sell management on Gentoo because "our secretaries will be able to open the word-processing program in 4.8 seconds rather than 5.5 seconds, thereby allowing increased productivity that will make our company more profitable"?

    (granted, there are some special cases, such as compilers for developers, where execute times matter, but the idea of building an entire desktop system with machine-specific optimizations seems silly. With current hardware, virtually everything executes vastly faster than the user can keep up with or even notice).

    1. Re:Don't you see an obvious contradiction? by Zigg · · Score: 1

      It's really just for the same type of people that overclock everything because they need "that last little bit", then fail to take into account their system's shortened lifespan, the time spent getting it OC'd in the first place, etc. Explaining to this type of person that there is a contradiction in their reasoning is simply a waste of time.

    2. Re:Don't you see an obvious contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A properly overclocked system does not have a significantly shorter lifespan. Most systems will survive much longer than they're considered useful (by most), with or without overclocking.

      If a person decides they want to squeeze every last little bit out of their existing hardware, where's the problem? WTF is with all these anti-overclockers these days?? People who want to tweak things will tweak things. Clearly they have the time to do so, so why do you care? I know a lot of people who overclock (or at least experiment with it), and not a single one of them thinks it's something it isn't. The Gentoo users I know are the same way. It's about control.

  73. Re:Great release MOD WAY DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, I know, I know: SCOfftopic!

  74. Re:OT SCO: Re:Great release by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they win (by that I mean there really was SCO code in the kernel) the code will be removed from Linux or rewritten. The person who added it will be sued by many Linux vendors for putting it there. SCO's case is with the person who put the code into to the kernel, not with Linux users. But of course by creating this fuss they're hoping to make money and get people to use their crusty Linux distro.

  75. Gentoo installation moans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is everyone bitching and moaning about the installation of Gentoo stages? The documentation should be followed by the letter. Of course, you should be able to read basic english. Point your finger to Debian if you want a real sucker of an installation.

  76. Unofficial bittorrents mentioned... Here they are by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    These were mentioned in the post but not actually pointed at.

    Hop on!

    http://dev.gentoo.org/~luke-jr/torrent/gentoo-1. 4

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  77. democratic alternative to Gentoo .... ?? by Anguo · · Score: 1
    I do wonder whatever happened to that one guy who wanted to fork Gentoo... did he ever follow thru with his plans?"

    He has attracted many people who now are part of a growing community (358 members so far)... That probably will get bigger once a first release comes out.

    What I like the most about this new, as yet unnamed distro, compared to Gentoo, is that it is on the path of becoming a truly democratic " distro (a la Debian) with the tools to achieve the goal.

    --
    http://www.masquilier.org/republic/election/ Condorcet, Plurality voting and alternative voting enabled bulletin board.
  78. Security updates for testing? by gnalle · · Score: 1
    I read something on one of the pages that Debian team does not feel obliged to provide securiry patches for stable. However it seems that they often do it anyway.


    How many percent of the security bugs are only corrected in stable but not in testing?

  79. Configuring apt-source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In Debian you can chose to compile all your packages at home using apt-source. Has there been any plans of improving the configurability of apt-source to win back some of the people who left for Gentoo.


    I guess that it would make a difference just to add -arch and -O2 to cflags.

  80. Re:OT SCO: Re:Great release by blytkerchan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IMHO, the mere fact that they *have* a Linux distro means they published the Linux source code under Linux's license - which means they agreed to the license (but IANAL)

  81. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by theanorak · · Score: 1

    Once the initial build's finished (and you can speed that up a fair way by starting at stage 3), I think Gentoo is a distro for the lazy - think about it: instead of having to find an application, download it, (build and) install it, all you need is one command and 1 minute/hour/day/week of compile time.

    --
    === Ask yourself if it's really necessary...
  82. Re:Great release MOD WAY DOWN by loginx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Of course I do.
    The point being... very lame to hide under the AC just so you don't get modded down for asking mods to mod someone else down...

    Thuth is... no one cares what you think so take your lame paranoid freak ideas up your colon, thank you very much.

  83. *bzzt* wrong! next item! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need to "compile everything."

    The second CD of the 2-CD set is the Gentoo Reference Platform, which contains "over 600MB of pre-compiled applications such as KDE 3.1.2, GNOME 2, OpenOffice, Mozilla, mysql, postgresql, Apache 2 and many more."

    Pre-compiled binaries are just as available as sourcecode only packages. Its your choice.

  84. Re:Oh Please...(it would be tainted if...) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Derivative works are more than just inspiration, I can't create a story in the Star Wars universe but I can certainly make one in a *different* galaxy far far away. It's not like any other story involving being in another galaxy would be "tainted" and the IP of George Lucas, just because I saw the movie.

    It would only be tainted if Lucas made a prequel to it.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  85. Installation by GlamdringLFO · · Score: 1

    I just started with Gentoo a few weeks ago, and while the installation was somewhat tricky, it was not any more difficult than Debian.

    It did take a while to get the ebuild thing figured out, and I had a few weird issues with my system, but one of the best parts about Gentoo is the immensely helpful set of user forums. I was able to find solutions for every single one of my problems there, as well as guides for installing trickier systems like mail-server combos, &c.

    I really like Gentoo because it's not difficult to find out what I need to do. It does take a little bit of patience up front, though, and I admit, compiling KDE for two days is something I hope I don't have to repeat soon.

    --
    Skal! AMS
  86. Larry the Cow by jimcooncat · · Score: 1

    On the About page of the Gentoo site, Larry the Cow reveals his frustrations with other Linux distros. Hmm, this reminds me of the Gateway commercials running a little while ago where Ted Wiatt talks to a Holstein heifer with a male voice.

    I dunno, but I gotta wonder if these are examples indicative of a common psycho-sexual trend among computer-using bovines ...

    1. Re:Larry the Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone else on Slashdot understands what you're talking about.
      In case they're reading, a COW is female, a BULL is male. Meeting Larry the Cow or the Gateway cow (with a male voice) would be like picking up some 'chick' with a deep voice at a nightclub... you'll likely find a bit more than you bargained for when you get 'her' back to your parent's basement.

    2. Re:Larry the Cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wondered why that milking machines had four of those thingies when I only needed one -- and Larry got REAL happy!

  87. "It takes too long to compile Gentoo" by BoysDontCry · · Score: 1

    This has been addressed in version 1.4. From the install docs: Note: A complete Gentoo Linux 2-CD set contains the Gentoo Reference Platform, which is a complete pre-built Gentoo Linux system including GNOME, KDE, Mozilla, and OpenOffice. The Gentoo Reference Platform ("GRP") was created to allow rapid Gentoo Linux installs packages for those who need this capability. The "compile from source" functionality, which is the cornerstone of Gentoo Linux, will always be a fully-supported installation option as well. The purpose of the GRP is to make Gentoo Linux more convenient for some users, without impacting Gentoo's powerful "compile from source" installation process in any way. Cool stuff!

  88. Time out! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2
    OK, everybody!

    Is it not possible to start a thread on any issue without including 150 posts bashing SCO? I heartily agree that they should be pilloried, but preferably when it's on-topic.

    1. Re:Time out! by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Today has been a really bad day. It's been a bad week. A moment to bang on a deserving head can be cathartic.

      But I'll agree, right after I posted, a better place to bang became available.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Time out! by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Is it not possible to start a thread on any issue without including 150 posts bashing SCO?

      While you do have a great point, the new SCO license does not prohibit such bashing.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:Time out! by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Is it not possible to start a thread on any issue without including 150 posts bashing SCO?

      No.

  89. MOD PARETN -1 OFF TOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT IS OFFTOPIC YOU NAZI ASSHATS!!!!!!
    --
    # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

  90. Yeah by renata.org · · Score: 1

    Finally. And all I have to do is emerge sync && emerge -u world. Thats why I love Gentoo.

  91. the ppc version doesn't even boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm the iso matches the md5sum, but it no worky...what a shame.

    Tried it on 3 oldworld machines (which they no longer support), and 2 new world machines. No go. Great QA guys :P Glad I didnt shell out $15 for it.

    1. Re:the ppc version doesn't even boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works perfect on every machine here.
      Even oldworld, which they *DO* support (even nubus using X-compilation). As for QA, the kernel used on the iso has been tested for a month. They even invited people to help test rc8 betas. Can you mount the iso under os x? If not, your cdrw is broken.

    2. Re:the ppc version doesn't even boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget to hold 'C' when rebooting with the cd in the drive.

  92. Question: Checkout of binary subdistro possible? by graf0z · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    is it possible to make a "binary sub-distribution" from gentoo? Consider this situation: i have a lot (>100) of appliances with small footprint (~50-100MB, eg. on USB-stick) with nearly identical hardware. I would like to run gentoo, but i do NOT want to install a compiler. Instead i would like to compile on a "master" system and then distibute binary packages for installing/updating the appliances.

    In other words i want to checkout a binary distribution from gentoo according to a special hardware profile.

    Any hints how to do that? As an absolute gentoo-beginner, i was not even able to install gentoo without gcc (okok, it's a source distro ...).

    Thanks, /graf0z.

  93. Re:gentoo topic - USE THIS ONE by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1
    here's the one I use, wish Slashdot would take it:
    Gentoo icon

    CB

  94. Re:OT SCO: Re:Great release by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Yeh, but they won't publicise that since it could be a lawsuit killer.

    I can see a few early retirements happening it SCO once the share price has risen enough. Do they even sell any software any more?

  95. fishing for compliments is what it's called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so you know

  96. Re:OT SCO: Re:Great release by aziraphale · · Score: 1

    > The person who added it will be sued by many Linux vendors for putting it there. SCO's case is with the person who put the code into to the kernel, not with Linux users.

    Hmm - interesting point about what the remedy would be if SCO is right. If it is SCO code in the kernel (i.e., code on which copyright belongs to SCO), then there are two illegal acts:

    1) plagiarism and passing off - the person who contributed the code to the kernel claimed code as their own that was not theirs. That's illegal, assuming the person doing the passing-off resides in a jurisdiction where SCO's copyright is recognised. And no, they wouldn't need to be sued - the relevant government could prosecute them for copyright infringement.

    2) distribution - this is where the real damage is done. Anybody who distributed the infringing code would be guilty of copyright-infringing distribution. You may claim 'good faith' belief that you had the right to distribute the code - but, I'm afraid, the GPL comes and haunts you here. The author disclaims all warranty and indemnity, if I recall. In other words, you're on your own, and it was up to you to make sure that the author of the code was telling the truth. So, anybody who ever distributed the code (and, under the GPL, thaqt could be anybody, couldn't it? not just distros, but mirror FTP site hosts, people who burnt copies for friends, anybody) could be liable to prosecution for infringing SCO's copyright. Doubtless, they could try to palm the suit off onto the original infringer, but because of the warranty disclaimer they may not get away with it.

    The lesson? When someone hands you a chunk of code with the GPL on the top of it, before you exercise any of the _rights_ the GPL grants you (such as redistribution), make damned sure the person who granted you those rights had the rights to grant in the first place. When someone licenses you code, you're entering into a legal agreement with them - you'd better be sure they're in a position to hold up their end of the bargain.

  97. I agree by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Gentoo's a great distribution, but it is hardly one of the founding distros.

    Gentoo has been around for, what, a year? Slackware and Debian have been there almost from the beginning. RedHat's done a lot to popularize GNU/Linux.

    Now, Gentoo has contributed something important. Namely, portage. It's not for everyone, though (no distro is), and you shouldn't bother recommending it to anyone who doesn't have the patience and desire to use it. There are many benefits that one can get (smaller code, completely customizeable system, choosing which version of something you use, etc), but they aren't of interest to the majority of people. That's fine.

  98. WAIT FOR IT.... by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Informative

    the latest kde packages (3.1.3) are still marked unstable in portage, so unless you want to compile KDE twice in a week wait until the kde packages move to stable.

    Can't think of anything else to wait on though.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:WAIT FOR IT.... by Squinky86 · · Score: 1

      Why would you need to compile kde twice in a week? A simple 'ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge kde' will get you your wonderful kde 3.1.3. Note that 3.1.3 has a nasty scrollbar bug in konqueror, so you might actually want to wait for 3.1.4 :). 3.1.3 is mainly only cosmetic facelifts and small bugfixes, I haven't seen much new functionality compared with 3.1.2.

    2. Re:WAIT FOR IT.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      ls /usr/portage/kde-base/kdelibs/kdelibs-3.1.3* ....
      kdelibs-3.1.3-r1.ebuild
      kdelibs-3.1.3.ebuil d

      Because the gentoo packages are/were still unstable.

      If you want a ?stable? system then you will be rebuilding kde some time soon.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  99. Re:Question: Checkout of binary subdistro possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You bet. Emerge has the capability to create binary packages similar to that of slackware, meaning they're just tgz's of the final compiled product. Then you can install the package with emerge as well, which will install all the deps (which can be precompiled as well) and stuff you need.

  100. Yar... Re:The funny part is... by RdsArts · · Score: 1

    Sigh, whatever Distro can upgrade the entire OS (in place!) with a single command: emerge -u world.

    freeBSD - portupgrade -aRr

    And then me system be upgraded, yarrrrr.

  101. What installer? by Tony · · Score: 1

    There really isn't an installer, though there are some in development (just search for "gentoo installer" on sourceforge). As another reply said, it's just a laundry list of commands.

    This means it takes a fair bit of knowledge to install. A lot of that knowledge can be gleaned from the install docs (which are *excellent*), but previous knowledge is certainly beneficial. If you know the difference between Lilo and Grub, you should be fine.

    That said: thought Gentoo has a great package management system, it falls short of Debian in the package management area; however, it's a more-current system than Debian. Also, unless you have either a lot of time, or a fast machine, or both, it can sometimes be a pain in the ass keeping up to date.

    (Me, I kick off updates at night, and it's *usually* finished by morning, unless it has to update XFree86, Mozilla, and Openoffice all at once.)

    IMNSHO, Gentoo is for those who are tired of simple life of "apt-get update". It's a lot of fun, believe it or not, as frustrating as it is (WHY isn't CFLAGS in a file that doesn't get updated with every Portage update?).

    For me, it was either the Hurd, or Gentoo. Once I'm bored with Gentoo, I'm moving on the the Hurd; but for now, Gentoo is plenty to keep me occupied.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  102. monthly? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I do it three times a week. It's the only way I can keep up, being on a 56k dialup.

  103. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  104. Re:OT SCO: Re:Great release by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    I think Linus is very careful about what gets in, so if the code was SCO's then someone has duped him.

  105. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said!

  106. *whew* by i8urtaco · · Score: 1

    I installed gentoo about a week ago. After running emerge sync for awhile the screen went blank. For some odd reason I thought my computer had given up and gone on strike until I reinstalled slackware. Thank God it was just going into sleep mode.

  107. What'S so great about gentoo then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No I do not think that portage is sooo great, that I would need a system based on it, no matter what. It's nice for compiling, but you can archive the same thing with debian too. I'd also agree to the people complaining about eternal compiling sessions, but what I think is the main advantage is:
    "being up to date".

    Debian has serious problems there. I want a system that feels l33t and looks nice, like every desktop user does. And if a new vesion of mplayer is out that supports one more video format and is a little faster --> hell yeah I want it on my box (and no I don't want to check every month if there is a new version and manually upgrade).

    The same level of being up to date in Debian can only achieved with backports, which are mostly incompatible with one another. That is the main difference between Gentoo and Debian. Gentoo is for personal users who like a little more action like patched kernels and flaky CFLAGS and who don't mind upgrading every couple of days. Debian is more industrial Linux.

    Differences to Suse and Mandrake: Suse (and Mandrake) think to much! I want to know what's going on, and not have nested scripts working behind my back. I don't know why everyone thinks it's cool to have the system work like XP.

    Differences to RedHat: Red had want's me to pay for upgrades

    Differences to Slakware: What was that packet management thing again?

    And some complaints too:
    Some packages simply never move from testing to stable even if the stable stuff doesn't work (like Eclipse for example)

  108. To anyone that modded this "flamebait" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an ass. You are a Gentoo "zealot." Gentoo is NOT a production server OS. If you use it that way, you're an idiot and I'd fire you if you worked for me.

    Stop being such fucking dorks. You sheep need to learn to suck it up and use the best tool for the job, not just what you think will make your friends think makes you 1337!

  109. PPC Torrents by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    PowerPC 1.4 Torrents are now available at http://dev.gentoo.org/~luke-jr/torrent/gentoo-1.4/ with the rest...

    --
    Luke-Jr
  110. MOD PARENT -2 OFFTOPIC, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IT IS OFFTOPIC YOU NAZI ASSHATS!!!!!!

    But this is off the topic that was originally offtopic! Trying to dig us out of the hole are you? Well, I'll help.

  111. Re:What is Gentoo based on? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

    The one-command part goes for any good distro these days... For example, in Mandrake you can simply: urpmi applicationname (tho in my experience they have so few apps you end up having to compile everything by hand anyway)

    --
    Luke-Jr