Slashdot Mirror


TRON Enters Alliance With Microsoft

David writes "As widely reported on OSNews.com, Forbes, IDG, CNet, AustralianIT, and Ashi Shimbun - Microsoft Corp. has entered into an alliance with the T-engine Forum, the consortium behind the free software TRON operating system. As TRON runs billions of devices worldwide, this will help Microsoft's goal of cementing WinCE / .NET in places as diverse as your toaster and cell phone, perhaps in a setup similar to how X-Windows is in relation to the Linux kernel." (Continued below.)

David continues: "This arrangement is ironic, as Microsoft is part of the reason why the U.S. in the 1980s prevented Japan from putting TRON into schools on the desktop by account of trade rules, which would've meant Linux may've never gone beyond being a footnote in the comp.os.minix archives. No doubt Microsoft is aiming to keep Linux out of the embedded space, and may in the long-term foster an environment where using anything other than industry-licenced OS software on the desktop becomes unviable for everyday tasks because all the infratructurial systems we take for granted today like radio, television, phones, IM, require Palladium-style walled gardens."

229 of 303 comments (clear)

  1. But... by condour75 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll never believe it... Tron fights for the users. He'd never work for the MCP.

    1. Re:But... by bludstone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Greetings program.

      --

      no .sig
    2. Re:But... by Xeth · · Score: 3, Funny
      He'd never work for the MCP.

      Get with the times man! Now they're calling it TCPA...

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    3. Re:But... by oolon · · Score: 2, Funny

      [End of Line]

    4. Re:But... by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get a clu.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    5. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you have any idea how many outside systems I've gone into? How many programs I've appropriated?

      Regards, Bill Gates

    6. Re:But... by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      MCP:"Put him in the games, let him hope for awhile, and then blow him away."

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    7. Re:But... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I'm worth millions of your man years.

    8. Re:But... by Logicdisorder · · Score: 1

      Yea all I need is fucking CE on my toaster. If the smartphone software is anything to go by as far as embedded devices, we are all up shit creek. I can see no need what so every for there to be any embedded OS to be in my toaster, oven, microwave etc. This stuff works pretty well now why make it more complex by adding embedded systems in it, means more shit to go wrong. Now there are people out there that would like to have this stuff on the internet so the can get a MSN message on there Pocket PC saying that there toast has poped and yea I can see how nice that could be but it just seems really lazy to me, you could just get off you ass and have a look.

      There is a place for embedded systems I just do not see why the hell it needs to be in my fucking toaster.

      --
      "The most dangerous creation of any society is that man who has nothing to lose." - James Baldwin, American author
    9. Re:But... by INSSOMNIAK · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Hi there! Would you like some toast?"

    10. Re:But... by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      There already is an embedded OS in your microwave. Maybe it's TRON. (Maybe not) But there is something regulating the operation of your microcontrollers. You didn't think that you just magically push buttons, and the tooth fairy puts those nice little numbers up on the LED display did you? You may even have several embedded OS'ses in one microwave, depending on what's in it. Now the toaster, you may not have an OS there, but if for some reason you have a microcontroller in there, it'll have an OS as well.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    11. Re:But... by sammaffei · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for my own Microsoft glow-in-the-dark frisbee that I can keep my code on.

      Shame it will only come in red. ;-)

      --

      Political correctness is the newest form of slavery.

    12. Re:But... by Jeagoss · · Score: 1

      intellitoast Just thought it matched the topic perfectly :)

      --
      Password Authentication Bypassed for Root
    13. Re:But... by mwood · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Now they'll have to put APA displays on microwaves so they can bluescreen. :-{

      Microcontrollers? We don't need no stinkin' microcontrollers! An oven is simple enough to just work out the logic and wire it up. These days I suppose you'd use a PLA or something, but back when all we had was stone knives and bearskins nobody thought it was hard to design logic for something that simple.

    14. Re:But... by rifter · · Score: 1

      "Hi there! Would you like some toast?"

      Toaster:"You seem to be trying to make toast. Would you like some help?"

      Refrigerator:"You seem to be trying to find the butter. Would you like some help?"

    15. Re:But... by Logicdisorder · · Score: 1

      yes but those OS(and I would not call them that more like a PCL system) in those systems a very fucking simple and just fucking work. What I was going on about was the next gen which would allow you to connect to the internet. Now I think that is just fucking dumb, I should not need to run a hot fix on my microwave to fix a RPC bug that allows some fuckwit to DoS it and you fucking know that it will happen. And the main point I was going for was the fact that the more we get computer thinking for us and doing stuff that we are more than capable doing we are going to end up a bunch of fat lazy wankers. Now you might be cool with that and that is fine but it will be a cold day in Hell before I buy a fucking toast that needs a internet connection before it can cook my fucking breakfast.

      --
      "The most dangerous creation of any society is that man who has nothing to lose." - James Baldwin, American author
    16. Re:But... by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, without a lot of the fucks. I don't really need a smart toaster either. The dial-a-color method works great for me too. I don't like Microsoft, and the benefits of simple OS's like TRON are their stability, which is probably directly related to their simplicity. Any more middleware or bloatware adds points of failure, and possibly, RPC bugs, as you've so eloquently (sic) put it.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    17. Re:But... by unusdemorsmortis · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, all that you have there are a couple PLDs and a microcontroller, nothing too complex, made something similar in my first digital circuits class. No OS needed in microwaves. BTW, I use a toaster that was made in the 50s (possibly before, don't know when my grandma bought it), and it makes damn good toast. Why do you have to be going and trying to screw it up by putting MS crap on it when toasters were making perfectly good toast before a digital computer was even conceived?

    18. Re:But... by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      The Microcontroller itself has an os on it. damnint. Why don't people think that small?

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    19. Re:But... by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Real Time OS (RTOS) and TRON are the microcrontroller OS's of choice.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
  2. That's Tron and Microsoft by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    They fight for the users.

  3. Shoot me now! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too late, they already put Windows on my gun, and it just keeps rebooting when I pull the trigger.

    1. Re:Shoot me now! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Too late, they already put Windows on my gun, and it just keeps rebooting when I pull the trigger."

      I tried to commit suicide using a Linux based gun. Unfortunately, by the time I figured out the right switches for the sht command, I felt better!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Shoot me now! by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, by the time I figured out the right switches for the sht command, I felt better!

      RTFM. It's sht [options] [caliber] [number of bullets], where -l is for lead bullets, -number is how you specify the number of the body part you want to shoot (where the default is in the air), -h for high velocity, and -q for auto reload. How much easier could it get?

    3. Re:Shoot me now! by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "RTFM. It's sht [options] [caliber] [number of bullets], where -l is for lead bullets, -number is how you specify the number of the body part you want to shoot (where the default is in the air), -h for high velocity, and -q for auto reload. How much easier could it get?"

      I tried to use the auto feature for caliber, and it wasn't working. I had to look that up. Oh, and it's -H not -h. Stupid man page had a typo in it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Shoot me now! by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Too late, they already put Windows on my gun, and it just keeps rebooting when I pull the trigger.

      That's just how it goes. If it didn't reboot, then you would've had a fatal error :p

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    5. Re:Shoot me now! by EverDense · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to use the -w & -k switches if you are intent on a murder/suicide.

      -w [number of wives to shoot]
      -k [number of kids to shoot]

      use the -q flag to query you before the gun will start shooting other people's wives and children.
      or use the -Y to answer "Yes to all", and blow everyone away.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    6. Re:Shoot me now! by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Nice to see the programmers thought of polygamous cultures. Usually these programs are really culturaly Western European in nature.

    7. Re:Shoot me now! by EvilAlien · · Score: 2, Funny
      Bah, the n00b should just use DrakSuicide and let the wizard walk him through it. He's not ready for the command line.

      Disclaimer: I am a Mandrake user, and I used DrakSlashdot to post this

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    8. Re:Shoot me now! by Lucky+Bastich · · Score: 1

      Well, Microsoft has done well in the pussyfication of computing. Maby they'll do the same with guns. Please stay tuned.

    9. Re:Shoot me now! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      & last but not least -S for silver bullets.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    10. Re:Shoot me now! by iebgener · · Score: 3, Funny

      How much easier could it get?

      well, you need to be root to do that.

    11. Re:Shoot me now! by beerman2k · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I'm still having trouble building it...

    12. Re:Shoot me now! by kubrick · · Score: 3, Funny

      -number is how you specify the number of the body part you want to shoot (where the default is in the air)

      An improvement on the first version, where the default was the foot.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    13. Re:Shoot me now! by sonoluminescence · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard you can still use the -flintlock switch for BSD compatibility.

      --
      Karma: Bad. Calmer, good.
    14. Re:Shoot me now! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      Man, just use Winsht under Wine already!

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    15. Re:Shoot me now! by nojayuk · · Score: 2, Funny
      Too late, they already put Windows on my gun, and it just keeps rebooting when I pull the trigger.

      That's what you get when you use a point-and-click interface with a killer app.

    16. Re:Shoot me now! by Noah+Adler · · Score: 1

      The real advantages of this type of implementation become obvious when you use it many times, or as part of a script. For example, you could easily set up a cron job to automate your suicide once a week, and always get the options right.

      Try doing that with your Windows gun!

  4. BSOLC by forsetti · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blue Screen of Light-Cycle?

    --
    10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
  5. Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't want a MS powered toaster. It would bring down my power network, and I would be open to power line viruses. Besides, it might start doing weird things and throw the toast at the ceiling for no reason, or just refuse to toast, and I'd have to reboot the toaster to get it to work again...

    No thanks! Spare me the Microsoft stuff and give me a good old mechanical toaster! Yah!!

    1. Re:Sorry... by LordOfYourPants · · Score: 4, Funny

      If my toaster were Linux powered, my toast would come out perfectly every time. The caveat is that the toast would have to be cut up into 40 pieces and thrown up into the air because the toaster is mounted on the ceiling and everyone who suggests that it should go on a counter would be told "You can open up the toaster and see the guts. Go build your own."

      On top of that, no one knows that they have to cut their toast into 40 pieces before a perfect toasting session because asking for help with their toaster nets them a "RTFM," leading them to a 400 page manual that explains everything but they kitchen sink when they just want to have a piece of toast. That, or they get directed to toast tech support which charges them $50 a year for a straight answer.

      There'd be a ToastMaster who would decide when and where the latest model of the toaster gets released. Again, other gizmo fans could roll their own toaster, but people taking on names like ToasterOne would end up getting in shit for doing so.

    2. Re:Sorry... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget you'll only be able to use MS certified bread in the toaster.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    3. Re:Sorry... by oolon · · Score: 1

      The OS with MS bloat will require a 200 Gb hard disk to fit it on, fortunately it doubles as the heating element.

      James

    4. Re:Sorry... by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      > I don't want a MS powered toaster. It would bring down my power network, and I would be open to power line viruses. Besides, it might start doing weird things and throw the toast at the ceiling for no reason, or just refuse to toast, and I'd have to reboot the toaster to get it to work again...

      You fool! Don't you know you can only use licenced bread with a Microsoft toaster?! Otherwise you add the potential for security vulnerabilities, like other people taking you toast!

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    5. Re:Sorry... by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      The OS with MS bloat will require a 200 Gb hard disk to fit it on, fortunately it doubles as the heating element

      No, that would be silly. Everybody knows that the toaster will have an internet connection where it can download the variuos .net services into ram.

      You will have perfect toast every time.

      And when there are death-related incidents due to the SOtoast virus Microsoft will be able to quickly download a patch to your toaster.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:Sorry... by BardicStorm · · Score: 1

      Do they sue the playset manufacturer because they were smarter than the instructions and as a result the swingset fell on their kid?

      Actually I think a more apt comparison would be that they ask their handyman friends to help them build the playset because they can't understand the japanese assembly instructions.

      There are those who do not feel comfortable wielding a hammer and those who have trouble understanding technical manuals.

      That said, RTFM, then if you need help ask. But don't always assume that because someone is asking, they haven't RTFM.

    7. Re:Sorry... by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      You have just instantaneously been added to my "Friends" list for coming up with a great tongue-in-cheek way of pointing out how elitism is hurting Linux. Bravo! What shocks me is that you haven't been modded to oblivion by the fair and balanced pro-Linux crowd that constantly hovers here.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    8. Re:Sorry... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they just want to make a friggin' tarball. Without reading through a godawful horribly formatted man page that requires scrolling through tons of never-used parameters just to create one. It's easier to ask someone who knows (and also the prevailing attitude is that someone experienced would know a better or easier shortcut way to do it).

      But I guess that wouldn't let people be elitist. That sort of elitism comes from geeks with no social skills. Normal people are willing to help out.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    9. Re:Sorry... by racermd · · Score: 1

      "Mmmmmmm.... Toaster Patches.... Gaahghghaaghghghaaghhgh..."
      - HJS

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    10. Re:Sorry... by isaac · · Score: 1
      But... the toaster manual is in Extended Backus-Naur Form! Everyone knows EBNF is the optimal way to configure and document the configuration of toast-making devices!

      -Isaac

      (those that miss the joke should look up EBNF and sudo. Mommy! It burns!)

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    11. Re:Sorry... by geschild · · Score: 1

      For people like you, there would be the Knoaster, or alternatively, you could buy the Lintoaster at a small premium but with full backward compatability...

      Now stop bitching, tongue-in-cheeck or otherwise, and just be glad the damn thing is fitted to the ceiling securely. :-D

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    12. Re:Sorry... by curne · · Score: 1

      No, they just want to make a friggin' tarball. Without reading through a godawful horribly formatted man page...

      Ahh, but is that not the very nature of Un*x command line tools, that you have to know them? When people open up a terminal and ask me about making tarballs, I invariably explain the ins and outs of what I tell them to type. In my opinion, they absolutely need to know unless it is the last tarball they will ever touch.

      Plus, I think you are being unfair to man pages. They were born that way, they cannot help it. :-)

      --
      All interpreted languages are abstractions over Lisp
    13. Re:Sorry... by pod · · Score: 1

      In the olden days, tar would not check things as carefully as it does today. I've zeroed out many a tarball and ruined many source, err destination?, directories, by not being on the ball and mistakenly switching -c and -x at an inopportune time, or putting the directory before the tar filename, or forgetting the slash, or some other such silliness. C and X are even right next to each other on the keyboard, so it'a an easy typo to make late at night.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    14. Re:Sorry... by rifter · · Score: 1

      That said, RTFM, then if you need help ask. But don't always assume that because someone is asking, they haven't RTFM.

      If the answer is actually *in* TFM, and they are asking the question, then they have not read TFM enough.

      That said, I have actually gone hunting for TFM on some things only to find an FAQ that says "This is for people who don't RTFM" but does not contain any useful information (or FAQ's for that matter. I think "how the hell do I make this work?" would be a pretty frequent FAQ for something with no useful manual). I thought of mailing the author, but they say they answer no questions and there is no mailing list, so I gave up on that package. :P

    15. Re:Sorry... by rifter · · Score: 1

      But... the toaster manual is in Extended Backus-Naur Form! Everyone knows EBNF is the optimal way to configure and document the configuration of toast-making devices!

      -Isaac

      (those that miss the joke should look up EBNF and sudo. Mommy! It burns!)

      Egad. I thought you were joking... man that is scary! :P

  6. In other news... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

    The classic arcade game "Discs of Tron" has been renamed "Discs of SELLING OUT."

    1. Re:In other news... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      TROFF
      [ End of line. ]

      For those old BASICA hounds out there. You know who you are.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  7. TRON for the Intel 83C442 by Radio+Shack+Robot · · Score: 1

    TRON, Yes! The Intel 83C family is quite capable of running WinCE, and with TRON keeping the bios up, this will work great. Microsoft made a great black power decision.

    --

    Beep. Boop. Beep. You have questions. I have answers and your home address.
  8. Re:OMG by JanusFury · · Score: 1

    Yes?

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
  9. What's going on here by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS: Who are your users?

    TRON: Forget it mister high mighty Microsoft. You aren't making me talk.

    MS: Suit yourself

    *derez of TRON commences*

    1. Re:What's going on here by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Yeah it's TRON...

      cat MStron > TRON

      A TRON is a TRON. Right.... I didn't think so either. I hope they backed up the good TRON!

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
  10. Oh my User... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    In jail, held by the MCP

    RAM: Oh my User...Tron--they've got you in here?

    TRON: Not for long, friend.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  11. Re:I for one by TheIzzy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Err, shouldn't that be "I for one welcome our Microsoft Overlords... Again"

  12. I have no real problem with this BUT ...... by zymano · · Score: 1

    Toasters & other simple electronics , no problemo . I will have a major problem if Monopolysoft gets into our new futuristic HDTV sets .

  13. such a shame by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Leopards don't change their spots
    Lions don't lie with lambs
    Microsoft doesn't play well with others

    Its really a shame that theres always someone out there who figures theyr'e the ones that can get a fair shake out of Microsoft.

    Microsoft allready moved against TRON being adopted by japanese schools. (WTO trade regs were their weapon of choice). Does anyone at the TRON project really think the vole of redmond has had a change of heart ?

    The only ray of hope here, is that it will provide a great impetus to embeded linux. I can just see chinese party officials thinking their refrigerators are spying on them because they run microsoft operating systems.

    1. Re:such a shame by Bendebecker · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The only ray of hope here, is that it will provide a great impetus to embeded linux."
      Nope, the only hope here is if one of us users can get into the system and liberate TRON before he gets the bits blasted out of him on the game grid.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re:such a shame by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that the T-engine Forum is like Pete the Puma when he and Bugs Bunny are having a social tea?
      [Microsoft] How many lumps do you want?
      [T-engine Forum ]Oh, three or four.
      [Microsoft]Wham! Wham! Wham! Wham!

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    3. Re:such a shame by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Leopards don't change their spots
      Lions don't lie with lambs
      Microsoft doesn't play well with others"


      Ah, but caterpillars turn into butterflies. Your argument is defeated! Buahaha!

      See how easy it is to attack an argument that overly relies on metaphor? I'm really suprised you were modded up.

    4. Re:such a shame by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is you getting into bed with Microsoft.

      This is you getting fucked.

      Any questions?

    5. Re:such a shame by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See how easy it is to attack an argument that overly relies on metaphor?

      For every common phrase or saying, there is an equal and opposite phrase or saying.

      For example:

      "The early bird gets the worm" vs. "Good things come to those that wait."

      Or, my personal favorite:

      "Great minds think alike" vs. "No two fools differ."

    6. Re:such a shame by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "They were just making a point."

      Actually I think it was more likely they were karma whoring.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:such a shame by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The early bird gets the worm" vs. "Good things come to those that wait."

      I prefer this one:

      "The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse always gets the cheese!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:such a shame by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "The purpose of a metaphor is to illustrate an argument, not to prove it."

      Oh please. We both know that his comment was "I hate Microsoft, why doesn't everybody else see that? Give me karma please."

      "And your "rebuttal" was meaningless,"

      Nope, it wasn't. Read it again, this time take off the "he's being an elitist asshole" goggles.

      "so the real question is who modded YOU up?"

      The two dudes with mod points who saw the humor in my post.

    9. Re:such a shame by daeley · · Score: 1

      That's because cliches are double-edged swords.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    10. Re:such a shame by AstroDrabb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I hate MS as much as the next guy. However, this looks like it will STILL be TRON and it will STILL be a free RTOS. They are just going to allow MS and their .Not crap to run on it. I guess this is how MS wants to try to get a monopoly on the embeded world.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    11. Re:such a shame by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "We do not know this, this is your supposition."

      Actually I read that into his post too. Though I agree with you, it's possible that he's just got an idea about Microsoft that he cannot back up with facts or anything like that.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    12. Re:such a shame by 1010011010 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about:

      • The Earth makes one revolution about its axis each day.
      • Air at normal pressure and temperature is less dense than uranium.
      • Microsoft cannot be trusted


      How could anyone ever arrive at the conclusion that Microsoft will not screw them?

      Microsoft's intentions in this deal are transparent. They tried to crush TRON with Super301. Now they're trying to subvert it. When TRON is just a way to run .Net, why would one need TRON?

      Same story, different day: "Microsoft seeks absolute control."

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    13. Re:such a shame by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      You could also just turn it around, "The early worm gets the bird." :)

    14. Re:such a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most people would read the original post as don't expect something to act against its nature. The original posts further refference to the Microsofts prior attack on the TRON forum establishes that prior behavior.

      If there is evidence that Microsoft Cooperates well with Open Source projects, I certainly would like to see it. The last time I can recall them using OSS was when they had to be sued to put the BSD copyright on their TCP stack. If there is an examples of Microsoft enterring into mutually successfull joint ventures with other Operating system companies, I would like to see it.

      On the other hand I can name examples of Microsoft playing dirty pool with its partners, and competitors alike. OS/2,Stack Electronics, Navigator, Digital Research, Taligent, Pink, are all examples of what fun it can be to participate with Microsoft.

      So is there anything to with the above rant or are you just Astroturf (tm).

    15. Re:such a shame by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Not to make an obvious karma-whore rant, but no one -- not even IBM -- has ever emerged from an "alliance" with Microsoft unscathed. What makes the TRON consortium think they'll be the first such example?

    16. Re:such a shame by kfg · · Score: 1

      Lions don't lie with lambs

      They most certainly do. . . when they're hungry.

      KFG

    17. Re:such a shame by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      Personally I prefer:
      > Is a bear Catholic?
      > Does the Pope shit in the woods?

    18. Re:such a shame by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know exactly what WTO trage reg it is that compels foreign governments to buy Microsoft?

    19. Re:such a shame by Lexic0n · · Score: 1

      Does anyone at the TRON project really think the vole of redmond has had a change of heart?

      Interesting typo. A Freudian slip perhaps?

      vole - n. - Any of various rodents of the genus Microtus and related genera, resembling rats or mice but having a shorter tail and limbs and a heavier body.

      I smell a rat!

    20. Re:such a shame by gravious · · Score: 1

      hey, you funny, me laugh long time!
      why no funny mod points for you?
      you sliced right throught their argument with your pointy edgey riposte.
      this posting business is a right lark.
      what was the topic again?

      --

      Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
    21. Re:such a shame by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • How could anyone ever arrive at the conclusion that Microsoft will not screw them?
      Perhaps because gobs of money exchanged hands underneath the table at a really run-down bar & grill on the bad side of town. All in unmarked bills.....

      Of course that's just purely hypothetical (I.E. Don't sue me Microsoft. :P)

    22. Re:such a shame by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the earth makes one rotation about its axis once a day.

      Yeah, *that* "R" word. Sorry! Sorry everyone!

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    23. Re:such a shame by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      It's only a matter of time before TRON is subverted by the dark side. Whenever Microsoft gets their claws into something, they eventually either buy it, run it into the ground so their own version can take its place, or steal all the ideas from it and make their own clone of it.

      Once enough embedded hardware is out there that requires .NET and other MS services, they'll start asking the TRON people to please extend this so .NET will work more efficiently, and please use this API for these things, and before you know it, all TRON devices will require .NET to function.... or there will be a TRON.NET which works just like normal TRON but is incompatible at the API level. Guess which one most big businesses will be encouraged to buy?

      Too bad, it WAS a nice elegant system. I guess my toaster will now require 512M of RAM just like all other MS products...

    24. Re:such a shame by noselasd · · Score: 1

      >Microsoft doesn't play well with others Ofcourse they do, as long as it's to their benefit also. Just like 99% of all other commercial companies. If you want to blame the way e.g. Microsoft runs things, blame capitalism

  14. Shit... by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where's Flynn when ya need him?

    Sark: "You're just an ordinary program!"
    Flynn:"So are you. One that should have been erased."

    Flynn:"Come on, how can you expect to rule the world if you can't solve a few unsolvable problems."

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  15. This just in... by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Funny

    TRON and Microsoft are only working together on a new security system that will be able to protect heterogeneous systems from attack, so there is no reason to worry.

    The first SDK for this software ("Skynet") should be out in about 18 months.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:This just in... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The first SDK for this software ("Skynet") should be out in about 18 months."

      6 years later, after the war is over, the OSS community will have finally finished making an Open Source copy of the system. There were no problems with the launch of Kskynet as it didn't have enough features to make it self-aware.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:This just in... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      The first SDK for this software ("Skynet") should be out in about 18 months.

      Finally. It's like, more than 6 years late already.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:This just in... by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      I (a unimportant nobody) am annoyed by you and people like you who make banal, tired references to pop culture that have been made hundreds of times before, in a pathetic attempt to snatch up some karma, and therefore, have some way of not feeling totally worthless. I'm one person, but there are a bunch of other people here too, who feel the same. I wish you would just end your life.

      Oh, you just wish you'd thought of it first.

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    4. Re:This just in... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      There were no problems with the launch of Kskynet as it didn't have enough features to make it self-aware.
      Or the user interface was so bad, it couldn't figure out how to use itself.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Oh Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Better than having to pay an extra $699 to SCO for my toaster.

    1. Re:Oh Well by Clanwolfer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better than having to pay an extra $699 to SCO for my toaster.

      No, you'd just have to pay SCO their special reduced price for embreaded Linux systems.

      --
      I've traveled so far. So how come this wheely thing I'm in hasn't gone anywhere?
    2. Re:Oh Well by spamtastic · · Score: 1

      Yes, but now the toaster has to come with ctrl, alt and delete keys.

    3. Re:Oh Well by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      But will it have ctrl-alt-del buttons?

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    4. Re:Oh Well by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
      No but you must register it within 30 dyas otherwise it stops working.


      or


      or


      Once in a while it will produce a blue toast of death.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  17. so why nobody is able to do something? by wilddur · · Score: 1

    If there is an big electrical company building another company sometimes there is an antimonopoly comision who needs to aprove the fusion.

    M$ has enough money to buy any company making a good operating system. At least, Tron is free.

  18. This is part of the .NET vs Java war by bizcoach · · Score: 4, Informative
    The main point seems to be:

    The agreement will allow the Windows CE .NET platform for digital devices to work on top of T-Kernel.

    1. Re:This is part of the .NET vs Java war by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      The agreement will allow the Windows CE .NET platform for digital devices to work on top of T-Kernel.

      Apparently they just wanted a better kernel than the WinCE kernel. Not hard.

      Java is already on a ton of competing devices, including Linux based ones.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    2. Re:This is part of the .NET vs Java war by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      good point. The story sounds familiar:

      1. Microsoft "cooperates" with an established competitor
      2. Microsoft embraces and extends established standard (TRON OS)
      3. Microsoft cuts ties with competitor and/or drops support for the standard


      Since WinCE uptake has been slow for embedded devices, this plan will "cut 'em off at the pass" by inserting .NET between the low-level OS and user-level apps. .NET is the new "OS".
    3. Re:This is part of the .NET vs Java war by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There's trouble wi T-Kernel. One of T-pointers as gone outen scope on T-stack frame.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:This is part of the .NET vs Java war by lpricci49 · · Score: 1

      What??? "Since WinCE uptake has been slow- -" WinCE is #1 based on licence revenue of embedded OS's. Lawrence Ricci (eMVP)

  19. No more burnt toast. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

    It'll bork well before charcoal, excellent news.

  20. No, they'll play fair enough. by JayBlalock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, I have no doubt that Microsoft will play relatively fair with these guys. If they're a non-profit org, that means they could pretty much pick up their toys and leave anytime they want. (in realistic terms; I obviously don't know what kind of contract was signed) The idea appears to solely be to let Microsoft take over what has always been a pretty serious competitor in Asia in the handheld markets. I have little doubt that whatever comes of this will be named "Microsoft Tron" or "Powered by Microsoft TN Technologies" or something like.

    It's just more assimilation. (and just think, they were probably prepping this deal at the same time they were whining about the China-Japan-Korea superOS being unfair)

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:No, they'll play fair enough. by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      "It's just more assimilation."
      ROM: "If you have any use he assorbs your functions and if you don't he sends you down here to gets the bits blasted out of you."

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    2. Re:No, they'll play fair enough. by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      As tiresome as the TRON quotes on this page have already gotten, that one is disturbingly appropos.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    3. Re:No, they'll play fair enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, but, this is basically working to put WinCE's functional layer over the top of TRON. You don't think Microsoft is going to GPL WinCE do you? Or see through TRON's goal of an open world-wide computing system which would have Microsoft on a level playing field with IBM, Sun et al? Many people will somehow program for that WinCE layer, and at some later date Microsoft may well dump having TRON running underneath for their own kernel software.

      Imagine how screwed Linux would be if X-Windows, KDE, Gnome, QT & GTK were owned by a company that decided to charge 699$ per copy. You could still use *Linux*, but most of the software wouldn't work. This will probably lead to the same thing with TRON/WinCE.

    4. Re:No, they'll play fair enough. by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      "TRON's goal of an open world-wide computing system"
      You'd have programs lined up just to use this place...

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  21. not looking forward... by s0rbix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not looking forward to the BSOD on my toaster...

    1. Re:not looking forward... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I'm not looking forward to the BSOD on my toaster..."

      You're two versions behind on Windows. Would you find it funny if I made a joke about how a Linux based toaster would have a USB port, but the kernel wouldn't know what to do with it? No, because Linux supported USB years ago. Think about it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:not looking forward... by IanBevan · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm not looking forward to the BSOD on my toaster...

      Is that a Brown Slice Of Death ?

    3. Re:not looking forward... by AArmadillo · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but that is what we must deal with to have such wonderful innovations as Clippy(tm) for the toaster. "It looks like you're making toast! Would you like help?"

    4. Re:not looking forward... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "We still occasionally get BSODs on XP at work. Not as often as 98, but they are still there...

      It will stop being funny when they are gone."


      It was December of last year when I saw a BSOD in XP. The joke's not funny. Tell it in 1999 and it's hysterical.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:not looking forward... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "It will stop being funny when they are gone."

      So it's okay to make kernel panic jokes about Linux?

    6. Re:not looking forward... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I saw a BSOD in WinXP in the last two months. I don't take great care of my XP partition, but hell, I don't take great care of my Linux partition either. I used to be a very careful Windows user, and as a result, even Win9x was stable for me. But Linux doesn't need me to be so careful (beta software, devel kernels, the works) and I just don't have the time to babysit my OS anymore.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:not looking forward... by ATMAvatar · · Score: 1

      That would be because Win2k/XP is written to reboot automatically instead of dispay a blue screen. I'm surprised you've seen one at all.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    8. Re:not looking forward... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "That would be because Win2k/XP is written to reboot automatically instead of dispay a blue screen. I'm surprised you've seen one at all."

      Um, yeah I would see that. You see, I do a little thing on my computer called work. When it goes missing, I notice. And believe me if XP did pull shit like that on me, I wouldn't be defending it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:not looking forward... by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Oh nonsense! I've never, ever once had a BSOD with Wi

      NO CARRIER

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    10. Re:not looking forward... by drfreak · · Score: 1

      It's not only ok. Been there, done that, have the screensaver.

    11. Re:not looking forward... by dann0 · · Score: 1

      No, Buttered Side Over Done.

      --
      "The big question in our lives is how to be at the same time a hedonist and in a hurry" - Alain Ducasse (?)
    12. Re:not looking forward... by cactopus · · Score: 1

      Clippy in the toaster would cause electrocution.

    13. Re:not looking forward... by cactopus · · Score: 1

      Is that a Brown Slice Of Death ?

      No black slice of death.

  22. Evil MCP by rindeee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, wait a minute. I always knew there was something strange about those Microsoft Certified Professionals and they ugly biege MCP polo shirts that were tucked frumpilly into their 38" Husky "big boy" denims. Little did I know how deep their dasterdliness ran. /shutter/

    ER

  23. Re:I for one by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    It should be, "Welcome the high and mighty Master Control."

    Come now children, we must all bow down to Emporer Gates.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  24. This one is very obvious by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My first reaction to this is that here is Microsoft trying to stem the tide against the proposed OS that China, Japan, and Korea are thinking about.

    In Japan, Microsoft has a fair bit of prestige... unlike, say, in Europe or the US where MS's reputation is sullied by the anti-trust suits. The Japanese, IMO, don't really think that the general public minds MS dominance... but then the Japanese wouldn't say openly that they hate MS or anything. Plus most IT workers would be thrilled to work for MS Japan... they have lots of cash after all. There seems to be no debate here about "which OS is better" like there is in other western countries.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:This one is very obvious by danny256 · · Score: 1

      In Japan, Microsoft has a fair bit of prestige

      I don't know about that, they still use the bill borg icon

    2. Re:This one is very obvious by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      So, your point amounts to saying that Microsoft can buy lots of prestige and people in countries that are not economically well-off. True, but that doesn't make building a nation's computational infrastructure on top of the products of a single foreign vendor a good choice. And while Microsoft makes lots of money, it employs comparatively few people, so most IT workers still end up empty-handed.

    3. Re:This one is very obvious by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      it's probably a matter of the Japanese crash. Fifteen years ago they were promising whatever, generation 7, or 4 or 5, some number. They were pushing everything past it's esoteric limits. Then, humbled for a few years. I can't wait until Japan is back on track.

      --

      -pyrrho

    4. Re:This one is very obvious by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      How was that his point? Japan and (South) Korea are amongst the most economically well-off nations on the planet.

    5. Re:This one is very obvious by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I've lived there while the Japanese economy was bad, and believe me, when the Japanese say their economy is at its worst since the war, its still in better condition than most other economies.

  25. In Microsoft America... by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..."Windows Powered"(TM) toaster sticks fork in YOU!

    ~Philly

    1. Re:In Microsoft America... by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      The good news is that the new toasters are supposed to include a "compatability mode" for bread that wants direct access to the heating unit, not the HAL (Heat Abstraction Layer, of course!). But unfortunately, new drivers will have to be written to make it work with older toaster covers, or 3rd party heating coils.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    2. Re:In Microsoft America... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      direct access to the heating unit, not the HAL
      Oh great, I go to unplug the toaster and it blinds me with a freakin' laser. And I'm not even called Dave!
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. They've Already Done It! by serutan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Talkie Toaster

    Would anybody like some toast?
    Well then, would anybody like some toast?

  27. MCP? by Schnake · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft Certified Professionals?

    ----
    * Before someone tries to corrects me, don't worry, I already know the reference to Tron the movie.

    1. Re:MCP? by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Before someone tries to corrects me, don't worry, I already know the reference to Tron the movie.

      "correct"

      Sorry, I had to. :-)

  28. Ashi Shimbun? by poslfit · · Score: 1

    Ashi Shimbun? Is someone pulling my leg?

    1. Re:Ashi Shimbun? by BJH · · Score: 1

      It's a misspelling. It should be 'Asahi Shimbun'.

    2. Re:Ashi Shimbun? by antoinjapan · · Score: 1

      ashi is the japanese for leg

    3. Re:Ashi Shimbun? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Yes, strange as it may seem, I do know that after 13 years in Japan...

  29. I'm all for it... by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 2, Funny

    if it means that when I can't figure out how to use a kitchen appliance a little anthropomorphized cartoon refrigerator character pops up, waves at me and tells me what to do.

    1. Re:I'm all for it... by El · · Score: 1

      That's waves at me, sticks out it's hand, says "pay up, sucker!" then tells me where I want to go today...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:I'm all for it... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I know it's like, the stupidest most stereotypical anime ever besides the old superdeformed shit with the godzirra sensibilities, but the character Sumomo from Chobits is just fantastic. Sumomo is a six inch tall android ("persocon" - compare "pasocon") who is very helpful.

      Sumomo is basically like a little laptop computer that can run around and converse. She answers basic questions but is unnaturally good at determining what one is trying to say, or so it seems from the fansubbed stuff I've been watching. You never know what kind of liberties they're taking. She has GPS navigation. But of course, persocons have amazing visual recognition skills and so on, they're definitely a "won't it be nice when" kind of thing. They're also quite animated, with a great deal of freedom of motion, and a long runtime.

      One day, though, I think that is the primary way we'll interact with computers, except for technical types. The persocons can be plugged into displays, each other, and assorted peripherals, of course.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. Not totally useless by bizcoach · · Score: 1
    I don't want a MS powered toaster.

    For any device with complicated enough functionality that it makes sense to put a microprocessor into it, it may actually be a useful feature for the device to be able to answer http requests with an XML document that provides a system status report. If you have 100 toasters or whatever, this will allow to check conveniently and efficiently which ones are broken.

    1. Re:Not totally useless by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

      That is assuming the toaster would still be http-reacheable when it "breaks".

      Last I checked, when a toaster is toasted, there isnt much left to repair.

    2. Re:Not totally useless by bizcoach · · Score: 1
      That is assuming the toaster would still be http-reachable when it "breaks".

      No, I wasn't assuming that. When the toaster doesn't respond at all, the program that does the diagnostics check on all toasters knows that it (or its network connection) is broken.

    3. Re:Not totally useless by AJWM · · Score: 1

      it may actually be a useful feature for the device to be able to answer http requests with an XML document that provides a system status report.

      Got something against SNMP? Especially "if you have 100 toasters or whatever".

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Not totally useless by unusdemorsmortis · · Score: 1

      Remember, that the toaster only costs about $25 to build, but the liscensing and registration costs inflate that to $500, so repairing that toaster now becomes a very good strategy.

  31. So finally, it is down to you by imipak · · Score: 1
    ...and it is down to me. Ever since a kindly friend explained the concept of Free software to me ten years ago, the question of Microsoft (as the exemplar of Propritariness and ruthless business practices) interacting with Free (and later OS) phenomena has been bounced around. Probably he and I talked about it back then. Would Microsoft be destroyed? Would they open-source Windows? Attempt to subvert the movement? FUD it to death? Suppose they ported Office to Linux? All these sorts of questions have been debated to death, especially on Slashdot. Well now we finally get to see how Microsoft treat Free software that they (think they) 'own'. Will they promote the Freedom aspect as a feature? Try to find loopholes in the license allowing them to fork a closed version? Quietly kill it and replace it with some bloated abomination? Perhaps they will themselves be virally assimilated, perhaps the power of the meme will turn the heads first of the engineers, then of the programmers, and then the project leads,.. revolution from within...

    Wow, definitely time I got some sleep ;) I guess we'll know in a couple of years.

  32. Clippy ][ by dswensen · · Score: 2, Funny

    This will mark the return of Clippy, mark my words.

    It appears you're trying to make toast. Would you...

    A) Like advice on which bread to use?
    B) Adjust your toast settings (will require Microsoft TOAST(TM)(R) Install CD)
    C) Prepare your spread of choice?
    D) Just go make some damn eggs (Microsoft Eggs will open in new window)

    1. Re:Clippy ][ by Laconian · · Score: 1

      Let's hope that when you turn the "Toaster Assistant" off, an animation is shown where Clippy's metallic self falls into the toaster and dies in a cascade of sparks.

  33. Hey by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    1980's: There are no problems, only solutions.

    2000's: There are no competitors, only Microsoft.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  34. Arghh... by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

    please! no more "Tron & MCP" jokes!!! i can't take it anymore!!!

    1. Re:Arghh... by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Fine.

      "When I depart, this toaster, and everything in it, will automatically de-rez."

  35. Slight correction by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1
    from the sound-of-mechanical-breathing dept.
    That might as well be the sound-of-silence dept., if WinCE has anything to do with it... :^)
  36. P2P by potpie · · Score: 1

    I guess this would be okay as long as I can use P2P file-sharing software on my toaster. Wouldn't that be nice? I've heard that Linux can run on anything more powerful than a toaster, but if Microsoft begins running NT on toasters, maybe somebody should produce a similar device based on Linux. Put speakers on it. WAIT A MINUTE!!! Will the new toasters/fridges/alarm clocks/cyborgs/zombies be vulnerable to virus attacks? And what exactly (If MS beats Linux to the toaster) does a blue toaster of death look like?

    --
    Esoteric reference.
  37. Oh... THAT's the problem.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

    "Some git installed Linux on my toaster. Took me ages to figure out that you have to hold the shift key to adjust the browning knob!"

  38. SCO is more compassionate than that by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    they'll charge you no more than a few hundred for your own toaster, provided that you can't get a shell on it.

    (Does a Titanium PowerBook count as a toaster? I'm willing to demonstrate cooking with it.)

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  39. Cement by liam193 · · Score: 1
    As TRON runs billions of devices worldwide, this will help Microsoft's goal of cementing WinCE / .NET in places as diverse as your toaster and cell phone, perhaps in a setup similar to how X-Windows is in relation to the Linux kernel."


    The first thing I thought of when I saw this write-up was this poster about MS's new OS.
  40. Top 10 Advantages of TRON/Microsoft Alliance by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    10. Hey Jeff Bridges: Time to get back to the arcade! It's Tron 2 time, not "The Bigger Lebowski".

    9. When that whirling MCP pillar slows down, it looks just like Steve Ballmer.

    8. Microsoft brass threatening Apple execs to send them back to the garage they started in.

    7. Don't ya just love those little Recognizers moving across the screen stomping worms?

    6. Anything that gets Boxleitner and Jurasik acting again brings us closer to that Babylon 5 re-launch.

    5. TRON? "Space Paranoids". Microsoft? I'm paranoid just using the 'Net.

    4. I can't see enough of the replay of the time when they sent Clippy down to die on the game grid.

    3. Microsoft now suing the moribund Star Trek franchise to smithereens for DS9's use of the Solar Sailor in one episode.

    2. Wendy Carlos changes back to Walter in honor of the composition of new TRON music.

    1. When that whirling MCP pillar slows down, it looks just like Steve Ballmer.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  41. But there would also be... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    ...a fork() for getting your toast out with if it ever gets stuck.

    <badaboom>

    Seriously, there would also be "spinoff" toaster manufacturers who make really pretty and easy to use toasters (Mandrake), and even portable toasters that don't need to be bolted to the counter (Knoppix) - which, thanks to the power of apt-get, can be bolted to the counter and drowned in 8,000 (yes, really!) accessories if you so desire.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  42. Oh great, by wardomon · · Score: 1

    now I'm gonna have to reboot my toaster!

    --

    - - - If the sun is a star, why can't I see it at night?
  43. My toast is burning... by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1

    because my toaster's embedded Windows CE seized up and I can't eject the toast.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  44. First my fridge.. by aaron_ds · · Score: 1

    Next MS is going to want to install Palladium in my children. Does that mean i can't reverse engineer them? (DMCA) ;)

  45. Run for the storm shelter... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...but grab the source first!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  46. Good initiative... bad judgement by Gunfighter · · Score: 1

    Given this course of action, even devices like my vacuum cleaner and mini-fridge will be vulnerable to DCOM exploits.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
  47. Is Tron Free Software? by bizcoach · · Score: 1
    Well now we finally get to see how Microsoft treat Free software that they (think they) 'own'.

    Is this Tron kernel thing really Free Software? Their FAQ doesn't sound like it...

    Q14: What are the license types available for T-Kernel?

    The T-Engine development kit includes T-Kernel and a license to execute it on the kit. You will hence be able to execute T-Kernel by buying the kit.

    If you would like to use T-Kernel on hardware other than the kit, such as your final product, you will need to conclude a separate license agreement with Personal Media Corporation, who is the developer of T-Kernel.

    If this is the case, you can choose from the following licenses:

    (1) Project license by product type (with source code)

    This license is granted by the type of the product. You may apply for this license, for example, when you produce a car navigation equipment in which T-Kernel is embedded. You have only to pay the license fee once regardless of the number of copies you produce as long as the copies are of the same product type. With this license, the more copies you make, the less your unit cost will be. However, you will need another license agreement for a different product or another type of the licensed product. This license is suitable for T-Kernel-embedded products to be manufactured on a large scale.

    (2) License by copy (without source code)

    With this license, the license fee needs to be paid for each copy. In this case, the source code is not given to you, and thereby you are required to run the copy on hardware that is compatible with the T-Engine development kit. This license is suitable for T-Kernel-embedded products of which many types are produced but only a small number of copies are made for each type, or for relatively large-sized T-Kernel-embedded products such as those used for plant control.

    Please contact Personal Media Corporation for more details about the licensing details or licenses other than the above.

  48. Windows Versions by zoloto · · Score: 1

    As TRON runs billions of devices worldwide, this will help Microsoft's goal of cementing WinCE / .NET in places as diverse as your toaster and cell phone

    Well bring out your tinfoil hats everyone. Microsoft has already created this OS to cement their foot in the door.

    WindowsCE
    WindowsME
    WindowsNT

    That's WindowsCEMENT

    Yup, time to bring on the tinfoil body suit so they don't pick up my vibe.
  49. Re:I for one by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

    I think that should be "I for one, welcome our new ToasterLords!"

  50. Coffee maker by rgcustodio · · Score: 1

    requirements: 512MB RAM and a Pentium 5 itll make a cup in 30 minutes, because of the number of times you would need to reboot the coffee maker! i always believed in the KISS (KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID) philosophy! who would want WinCE and .NET on an hard-realtime embedded system?! damned! where is this world going.

  51. Lessons from history by One+Louder · · Score: 1

    As they did with everyone else with whom they've "allied", the alliance will last exactly as long as it takes for Microsoft to get any proprietary information they want, then they'll kill the deal. The industry is littered with the empty shells of companies formerly "allied" with Microsoft.

    1. Re:Lessons from history by bizcoach · · Score: 1
      As they did with everyone else with whom they've "allied", the alliance will last exactly as long as it takes for Microsoft to get any proprietary information they want, then they'll kill the deal.

      This particular business alliance isn't about MS getting information from the alliance partners, it's about both sides increasing their ability to sell their commercial products. I predict this alliance to be stable for the foreseeable future (until MS loses their dominating position in the PC OS market) for unrelated reasons.

    2. Re:Lessons from history by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      I must agree on this one. This is just another opportunity for Microsoft to establish market dominance where they currently have no relevance.

      From a business perspective, once the alliance is complete this provides a way to immediately announce the availablility of WindowsCE on more platforms than anyone else. Ug.

      While it is great to have a free market economy, it is unfortunate when companies have huge financial coffers that provide them a golden parchute to commercial success. The good news is this won't last forever; the bad news is this could last long enough to quelch any real innovation.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    3. Re:Lessons from history by rgcustodio · · Score: 1

      Given these circumstances! I DONT KNOW why T-Engine Forum had the guts to go ahead with the alliance. I dont see anything good in this alliance.

  52. Rather Scary If You Think About it by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Here MS is trying to buy their way into the largest 'non pc' market there is.

    If this is real, then it spells disaster for a LOT of embedded people out there..

    Ultimately it will impact us 'regular folk', when you have to license your damned refrigerator, and MUST have it online or it stops working.... or wonder if your ABS brakes will really work when it comes time to use them. God help us all.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. My dog eats butterflies! by pr0ntab · · Score: 2, Funny

    Therefore: BSD is dying, QED.

    Wait, now I'm confused. What was this analogy about?

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:My dog eats butterflies! by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  54. The library barrel-1.2.2.4 has not been found by melted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please download it off some obscure site, then satisfy its dependencies then satisfy the dependencies of its dependencies only to find out that it either blows up when you use sht command or would not compile due to bugs in the code/different GCC version/missing files.

  55. Not a good idea for the kitchen by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Martha, the kitchen has a virus ...... again...

    1. Re:Not a good idea for the kitchen by caluml · · Score: 1

      Who is Martha?

  56. cut out the crap bit by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's goal of cementing WinCE / .NET in places as diverse as your toaster and cell phone, perhaps in a setup similar to how X-Windows is in relation to the Linux kernel."

    Good so we can take off the WinCE bit and just replace it with X-Windows?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  57. Re:Obligatory by H.G.+Pennypacker · · Score: 1
    It is not X-Windows. It is X, or X Window System or X11.. etc. However, it is specifically NOT X-Windows.

    HTH. HAND.

    --
    -- HG Pennypacker, wealthy industrialist and philanthropist
  58. CeMeNT Pun? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    ...this will help Microsoft's goal of cementing WinCE / .NET....

    I'm not so sure the use of the word "cement" was entirely accidental. (Don't tell me I'm the only one who immediately thought of the Windows CeMeNT thing?)

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  59. What happened to this? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    TRON + Linux = "T-Linux"
    I tried to email these bone-heads, however I get weird errors trying to send email to office@www.t-engine.org

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  60. quick!l by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    let's hack the gibson and destroy tron!

    oh wait, wrong movie. damn.

  61. Mosaic? by MoronGames · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember another product called Mosaic. Microsoft did something with it, and Mosaic pretty much disappeared. Hmm... Could the same thing happen here?

    --
    hey!
    1. Re:Mosaic? by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You must be thinking of viola

  62. Maybe it is not that bad? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    I hate MS more then the average /.er. However this snip from the article doesn't sound that bad.

    The forum is developing a next-generation TRON system called T-Kernel to speed up the development time for new electronics products. The group will make the source code for T-Kernel available in November, Mr Yamada said.

    The agreement will allow the Windows CE .NET platform for digital devices to work on top of T-Kernel.

    So it will still be free and the code will still be open and NOT controlled by MS. However, MS is happy to just get their nasty claws in on this one way or another. Now, I wonder what the situation will be in a few years as MS tries to take this over and create another monopoly.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  63. MS Toaster tm. by incom · · Score: 1

    Still better than MS Toaster tm. , which must be bought inseperable from the countertop, and costs hundreds of dollars. Not to mention the random fires and worm infestations that would afflict your kitchen.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  64. Enemy's Enemy is Friend by taweili · · Score: 1

    Linux is probably the biggest threat to TRON in Japan given Japanese government and large industrial giants like Panasonic and Sony's attitude toward Linux these days. On government side, the Japanese government is proposing to Chinese and Korean governments to develop Microsoft alternative based on Linux. Sony, Panasonic, and others were probably biggest licensee of TRON are moving to Linux.

    What does TRON has to do to survive? Hooking up with enemy's enemy is a unavoidable.

  65. That's Gonna Be One Thin .NET by cmholm · · Score: 1
    (What I hope is) the problem with this scenario is the overhead even a tailored .NET layer would add to an embedded device. WinCE hasn't seen a lot of take up because of licensing costs, perceived lack of reliability, and even with the device-specific tailoring, thirst for resources.

    TRON is unlicensed, reliable, and light weight. A .NET layer is going to have to be hidieously slimmed down to fit in most devices TRON is used in.

    The only reasons I can see a vendor using .NET would be a perception that some development time might be cut in graphics front ends and networking stacks. There are already network and graphics libraries in play in the embedded world, and unless .NET can prove very nearly as tightly coded, who'll want to pay to support the overhead?

    The cost driver in most mass consumper electronics isn't the software developer, it's the bits and pieces making up the device. Is Samsung gonna want to increase the OEM cost of a phone by, say, $10/unit to support some neato Microsoft hardware abstraction?

    I think this will be much ado over nothing.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  66. Huh? by Compuser · · Score: 1

    Seems like MS now is to TRON as Trolltech/Qtopia
    is to embedded Linux. That said, original TRON is
    public domain, so it's not clear why MS would
    need any agreement to port their CE GUI to it.
    Could it be then that the new TRON T-kernel will
    not be public domain. That would suck for a lot
    of manufacturers.

  67. So where's the code? by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    If this is an open-source project, doesn't it force MS to disclose their code too?

    Otherwise MS is in breach. Not that they aren't already in contempt for a lot of things they've been found guilty of...

    Or could this be what Microsoft calls a viral infection into themselves and could the open-source community use this to force MS to open all their source?

    How do we know MS hasn't already included GPL code in Windows without releasing the source-code?

    By SCO's weird logic, all of MS's products are derivative of GPL components, and MS should be forced to give back all the money they've collected.

    Can you imagine that?

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  68. my interpretation by f00zbll · · Score: 1

    I read the article and if I understand correctly, they already have the next generation kernel. Now they are adding a layer, so that windows stuff like CE.NET can run. So basically an emulation layer that converts windows API calls to TRON system calls. It's still open source and MS can't hijack it. If anything, it will force microsoft to make their applications more reliable and they should learn how to write a real-time operation system in the process. Since winCE obviously isn't a "true" real-time OS in the pure definition.

  69. TRON is free, what happens when MS Corrupts it. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    They said the inventor could of been a penny billionaire just by the amount of devices it has been installed on over the years. In fact he runs it on his home pc instead of Windows.

    I'm sure MS wants to get something in there they can charge royalties on.

  70. Window CE is just one of the middlewares for TE by pario · · Score: 5, Informative
    Everyone here seems to have missed the main point. This alliance only means that Microsoft will create a version of Windows CE .NET that runs on the T-Engine platform. T-Engine is a collection of standards for embedded hardware, realtime operating system and middlewares, and for the T-Engine platform Windows CE .NET will be just one of the middlewares. This news is not even about Microsoft taking over TRON or MS vs Java; in fact, there are T-Java and T-Linux under development, by Sun and Montavista, respectively, and other GUI middlewares on sale, which were originally part of BTRON, the TRON desktop OS. Most information about T-Engine is available only in Japanese at this point, but you can find some in English here.

    As a sidenote, the main thrust of the T-Engine platform is high portabilty of middlewares across various embedded emvironments with different CPUs. This portabilty is made possible by a standard opensource kernel, which is based on micro-ITRON 3.0, and standalization of hardware. Dr. Sakamura even said he is going to fix the specification of the realtime kernel by the end of year and it will not be changed for the next HUNDRED years for the sake of comatibilty of middlewares. Moreover, there are rumors that a subsidary of Panasonic is developing a desktop operating system based on T-Engine. This is a very exciting year for the TRON project indeed.

    1. Re:Window CE is just one of the middlewares for TE by Khalid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed here the press release for T-Linux

      http://www.mvista.com/news/2003/t-engine.html

  71. Toasters? by euxneks · · Score: 1

    WinCE / .NET in places as diverse as your toaster and cell phone

    So.. then... the smoke will mean it's working? I don't get it...?

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  72. yeah but by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    The windows toaster will connect to the internet without your permission and download advertisements that will be burned onto the bread you put into the toaster. The linux toast will just come out with a cute penguin on it, but of course you'll be able to change that by setting the toast-image flag.

  73. Um, too bad M$... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I'm boycotting M$. I don't use M$ products. Don't have any M$ products in my house and never will. None in my 1975 German car either..
    I don't have anything new, I don't buy new things. Tough shit M$..

  74. boooring by Dan+Farina · · Score: 1

    Don't you know? NetBSD already runs on many toaster platforms.

  75. Tron is open source?? by molo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I said it before and I'll say it again: where can I find the source and the license to tron? It seems that tron is more of an open specification of a RTOS, and there are a ton of closed binary-only implementations.

    This actually kinda reminds me of the MIPS processor architechure.. there is an open specification and lots of people produce chips for the ISA.. but it wasn't until opencores came along that there was an open implementation.. and there is no open implementation for TRON yet, AFAIK.

    Is tron open-source? Where is the code? Where is the license? Whats the story here? If it really is open-source, why can't someone point to the code? Something is fishy here.. or perhaps its just lost in the translation.. but I can't figure this out.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Tron is open source?? by rgcustodio · · Score: 2, Informative

      TRON is not an implementation BUT a set of specifications that describe an OPEN COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE.
      i suggest everyone read this introduction to TRON: http://www.assoc.tron.org/spec/tron_overview_eng.p df

    2. Re:Tron is open source?? by kahei · · Score: 4, Informative

      *sigh*

      TRON is a set of standards, SOME of which relate specifically to a realtime OS.

      You can buy the standards from the TRON Association and implement them.

      There is no source, unless you write some.

      Incidentally, how precisely did the parent post get modded *up* rather than *down*? I mean, I don't usually RTFA any more than the next guy, but it's a bit depressing that so many people made their opinions public without stopping to learn what the topic even *is*.

      By the way, MS deal with TRON consists of layering .NET on TRON in the same way many other things are already layered on it (or, to put it another way, making CE .NET conform to the TRON standard). This is a sensible and obvious thing to do and is the kind of thing TRON is designed for. Nothing to see here, tinfoil hats back in pockets please, move along.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    3. Re:Tron is open source?? by joelsherrill · · Score: 1

      TRON is a set of standards. I know of two free implementations of the microITRON standard -- eCos and RTEMS. --joel sherrill

    4. Re:Tron is open source?? by molo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. The reason I was asking was because the last time TRON was mentioned on slashdot, it was in an article calling it "the unknown open-source OS".. that is where I posted my previous question that I linked to (which went unanswered even though it was +5). So that article is totally misleading and false.

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/16/1521 20 8

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  76. Gates Wrote TRON by cygnus · · Score: 1

    since bill gates and paul allen wrote TRON, the 'trace-on' command they added to BASIC when they were first hacking together MS-DOS from what they bought from Seattle Computer Products, couldn't it be said that TRON was always in an alliance with Microsoft? :)

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  77. Hmmm... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe that joke about Microsoft making something that doesn't suck (vacuum cleaner) may be coming to real life very soon?

  78. I think ... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

    ... that you deserve a mod-up. The world hasn't got enough Terry Pratchett references yet.

    The Amazing Maurice rocks!

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  79. These guys need help by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is there address in order to ask them if they are:
    1) Completely mad
    2) In advanced stages of dementia
    3) Under severe coercion
    4) Have a death wish.

    Remember not to sent inflammatory correspondence as this is unlikely to influence them :-)))

    T-Engine Forum Secretariat

    (In the YRP Ubiquitous Networking Laboratory)
    The 28th Kowa Building
    2-20-1 Nishigotanda
    Shinagawa Ward
    Tokyo 141-0031
    Japan
    Tel: +81-3-5437-2270 (Representative)
    Tel: +81-3-5437-2338
    Fax: +81-3-5437-2271

    Email: office@www.t-engine.org

  80. Microsoft a Board Member??? by rgcustodio · · Score: 2, Informative

    anyone of you guys read the T-Engine site??

    http://www.t-engine.org/english/member.html
    it says Microsoft is an A Grade Member and is a Board Member? whoa! i didnt get to see the site before the alliance so did MS just become board member in an instant or what?

    1. Re:Microsoft a Board Member??? by blue_collar_man · · Score: 1

      If you scroll down even farther, MS is also an e member.
      Maybe they upgraded?

      I don't see anyway MS could possibly bully that group around. There be some BIG names on the board. Some of them like Linux.

      --
      -- Up to no good and lovin' it!
    2. Re:Microsoft a Board Member??? by rgcustodio · · Score: 1

      i just hope!!! i just hope!!! they might ruin a perfectly good OS.
      ive used uTRON on some of my projects thats why i dont like MS having its hands on it. MS has a kind of "Midas Touch" it turns everything it touches into gold (mines) but makes it worthless.

  81. GNU by kahei · · Score: 3, Funny


    You may be thinking of a vendor sht. He's probably using GNU sht, which takes caliber etc from a file of tab (NOT space -- think make!) separated records -- exact syntax available in handy 'info' format.

    Frankly it's easier to just use windows and call IFirearmsEx::WGunSystemBulletOperationShootEx32(HG UN gun, HAMMO ammo, LPTRAJECTORY trajectory, LPSHOOTPARAMS params, DWORD reserved1, DWORD reserved2, BOOL &bHitYesNo)

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:GNU by Scherf · · Score: 1

      I'm debugging an MFC App at the moment (well, besides reading Slashdot), and that comment actually made me spit Coke over my keyboard.
      Hilarious...

  82. While everyone's so worried about their toasters.. by DMadCat · · Score: 1

    I'm still trying to Ctl-Alt-Del and End Task on the ice machine (which is of course "not responding") and reboot my refridgerator so I can make dinner!

  83. Re:I hereby forbid any more Tron jokes by gravious · · Score: 1

    how is this post modded as flamebait? as predicatable as the nerdy tron jokes is the nerdy modding.

    --

    Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
  84. Reminds me of Java... by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1
    it will not be changed for the next HUNDRED years for the sake of comatibilty of middlewares
    Little OT: I wished the creators of Java decided to make a great language and then freeze it. That way, the true portability could have been reached (like you write once and it runs everywhere). I see 3 big problems with Java:
    • Right now, everytime I run a Java app, I have to upgrade Java (granted, I only run an app about once a year...).
    • And the last time I wanted to run a Java App, it was a Java 1.4 app, and while it was out for Windows, Java 1.4 for Mac OS X took another 3 months until it came out :-(
    • When creating apps that should be compatible with consoles and cellphones, you cannot rely on an upgradable runtime environment because these devices often aren't upgradable at all. Therefore, true "run anywhere" cannot be promised without freezing Java.
    Of course, to freeze Java, Sun would need to would first need to make the language bug free (which couldn't have been said of 1.1, and there still are bugs in the newest incarnations) and have a clear, nice, rounded-up feature-set.

    We can still hope, though, that they will someday see the light :-(

  85. Stupid question by kinnell · · Score: 1
    The tie-up would enable appliances, cars and other gadgets worldwide that operate on the group's free TRON operating system to eventually work like personal computers.

    Why would I want my car to work like a personal computer? Wouldn't it be better if my car behaved like a car?

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  86. No WinCE on small devices by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

    How likely is it that we are going to see WinCE/.NET on small devices? These still typically use 8/16-bit micros. I would imagine WinCE requires a 32-bit micro.

    Sure, prices are dropping but the smaller micros will always be cheaper. Let's face it, they're good enough for a microwave or toaster or...

  87. Trogdor and Microsoft merge... tonight at 10 by FluffyG · · Score: 1

    thats what i thought of when i saw the title... imagine a one armed dragon with an ass load of money

  88. Sendo by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Its really a shame that theres always someone out there who figures theyr'e the ones that can get a fair shake...
    I'm not sure how TRON is going to be able to avoid getting the Sendo treatment like everyone else.
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  89. Re:yes...a viable supported embedded system by lpricci49 · · Score: 1

    WinCE PLatfrom builder is about $1K, with an IDE better than anything else (except maybe Tornado). There is a 120 day full funtion free trial, and you can build emulators of multiple CPU's/Systems to write code on your PC. This is not costly. The 16 bit Tron is an interesting addition to the .NET family of OS's. If they supply a CLI (an open stadards, not controlled by MS) you can write .NET apps in C#, J# or for that matter FORTRAN.NET. It is not infected with the GPL like Linux, so serious products can be made. If TiVO was TRON, there would be no websites hacking TiVO. Lawrence Ricci

  90. Re:my toast! by mink · · Score: 1

    reminds me of the toasters in Red Dwarf.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  91. EULAS on toast! by jmors · · Score: 1
    Be sure to pay careful attention to and thoroughly read the Microsoft EULA that will be burned into each slice of toast.

    Does this mean that my toaster will be susceptable to viruses now?

    --
    The Matrix is real... but I'm only visiting!