Slashdot Mirror


Eddie Izzard As ... Doctor Who?

cmdr_forge writes "The BBC is reporting that Former Doctor Who Tom Baker says that Eddie Izzard is to be the next doctor for the TV show that starts 2005. How awesome is that!"

354 comments

  1. meh by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who cares? He'll be replaced with no explanation anyway.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:meh by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

      That's only alittle funny :-/

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    2. Re:meh by RTPMatt · · Score: 1

      a new who? I had not even heard. well, sweet, the doc rocks!

    3. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hadn't even heard?!?

      Pff, call yourself a geek!

      Please remove your tinfoil hat and Tux pin and hand them in at the front desk on your way out. ;)

    4. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares?

      I care alittle.

  2. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay, I know a lot of people have no clue who the fuck Eddie Izzard is, in America, but as an American I have to say he is one of my favorite comedy performers, not quite but *close* to the same level of the likes of George Carlin (let's be honest, NOBODY is at the level of George Carlin, but Carlin).

    I still am skeptical of how well the new Dr. Who series will be done, but putting Izzard in as the good Doctor is a GREAT step!

    1. Re:Excellent! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Even George Carlin has always looked up to Richard Pryor as the master.

      Although, all things considered it be better if George plays The Master. I'll leave it to your tasteless imgination as what role Richard could play.

      Other than that minor caveat I'm with you.

      I have to admit my first reaction to Izzard as The Doctor was . . ."Ummmmmmmmmmm, maybe, I don't know," but the idea is starting to grow on me.

      I generally take that as a sign it's a good idea.

      KFG

    2. Re:Excellent! by Dj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, well, us folks in the UK actually know what Izzard has done in the acting department; he was fantastic in 40 and his Imdb entry seems to miss the play screened on BBC4 with Eddie as the father of a special needs child which was just heart breaking.

      And the transvestite stuff? Well, Eddie Izzard dropped that from the act years ago. And anyone who can do five minutes on jam and make it hilarious is fine by me. Oh yes, and if you've ever seen him go bilingual in a set, well, then you're lucky to have seen a master of international comedy (who takes the international bit seriously).

      If all you can see is a frock on stage, that says more about you than it does of Eddie Izzard.

      And, for the record, I think he'll be a superb Doctor.

      --
      "You know you want me baby!" - Crow T Robot
    3. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Carlin is in a league of comedians who's jokes are so insightful and hysterical that even after 20 years will crack people up."

      Dirty words, how insightful. And don't try to pretend that anyone under 40 recognizes Carlin as anything but the Seven Words You Can't Say On TV Guy, which is only marginally better than being the Watermellon Smashing Guy.

      I'd rather see the Cross-Dressing Guy any day. He can do a set on classical literature, geography, world politics, religion, and jam, then turn around and do it again in French--without, I might add, sinking to the level of cheap scatalogical humor.

    4. Re:Excellent! by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't think of the two as being in the same boat at all.

      Carlin is very inciteful, Izzard is surreal. How people try and mix the two is beyond me.

    5. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Woo Hoo. Look at me I'm an attention whore. I wear female clothing!"

      That's "feminine clothing" or "women's clothing" moron: the clothing is inanimate and thus has no gender in the English language.

    6. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shave his head and Pryor can play Davros, he already has the wheel chair.

    7. Re:Excellent! by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Your ignorance of the importance of George Carlin's work is astounding. Carlin's 'cheap scatalogical humor', such as his fart jokes, have always been minor bits. Anyone that thinks he can't do a set on topics such as politics, religion, and literature obviously hasn't seen a damn thing he's done BEYOND the 'seven deadly words', which in itself is an important social commentary.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    8. Re:Excellent! by Angostura · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely this should be modded 'inciteful'?

    9. Re:Excellent! by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      I think you have missed most of Carlin's work.

      Sure there are the trivial humors, but there are also a lot of profound thoughts, ideas, and views on world events.

      BTW, it is spelled 'scatological'

    10. Re:Excellent! by iainl · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And don't try to pretend that anyone under 40 recognizes Carlin as anything but the Seven Words You Can't Say On TV Guy"

      Nonsense. As the original post title suggests, we all know him as Rufus from Bill & Ted before we know about Seven Words...

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    11. Re:Excellent! by pinko-rat-bastard · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it is more likely that the Slashdot crowd knows him mainly as "Mr. Conductor" from Thomas the Tank Engine. (Personally, I think Ringo did a better job, though)

      --
      YooHoo/2U2
    12. Re:Excellent! by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Dropped the transvestite bit? Not on his latest comedy tour, Sexie

    13. Re:Excellent! by Dj · · Score: 1

      When I say dropped, I mean as a major element of the act itself. I mean, if you listened to that element of the act, the major point of it was "So I like to wear a frock, it doesn't make any difference does it"...

      --
      "You know you want me baby!" - Crow T Robot
    14. Re:Excellent! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Actually, anyone under 15 would probably recognize him as the guy who replaced Ringo on Shining Time Station.

      Hey, there's an idea for a brilliant Doctor: Ringo!!!

    15. Re:Excellent! by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

      Wehn I saw sexie he said something to the effect of...

      "I keep getting told this is a gimmick, well it's a 20 years long gimmick."

      (^not a direct quote)

      He had fake breasts on for Chrissake.

      I don't think I would say he has dropped it. It's about as much of an aspect of his personality as the fact that he is friggen hilarious.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    16. Re:Excellent! by TomV · · Score: 1

      I still am skeptical of how well the new Dr. Who series will be done

      I'm not too worried. Russell T Davies has consistently shown himself to be one of the most talented UK TV writers in a generation, and he's a long-standing fan of the show, even to he extent of having written a very well-received New Adventures novel (Damaged Goods). And most reassuring of all is the clear statement that it's to be made for a family audience, not anal longterm fans like me or cliquey teenage genre-viewers.

      Mind yuo, all the evidence at the moment suggests Davies wants Bill Nighy for the part, which would represent a *fantastic* return to the original premise of a mysterious and somewhat grumpy stranger with a very uncertain background. Hartnell all over again instead of the knockabout comedy the show was reduced to in the Graham Williams era, when Tom B had been in the role rather too long and was getting bored and playing it for laughs, and which the show never really recovered from.

    17. Re:Excellent! by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      If you're gonna choose a rock star for The Doctor, it would HAVE to be Roger Daltry...I mean c'mon, give him the overcoat and scarf, and voila!

    18. Re:Excellent! by mr.+methane · · Score: 1

      Hey, dressing up as captain kirk is one thing.. but wearing a dress? ewwww! lol lol

    19. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, can't do that... Daltry's busy on the History channel!

    20. Re:Excellent! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > "And don't try to pretend that anyone under 40
      > recognizes Carlin as anything but the Seven
      > Words You Can't Say On TV Guy"

      Not even that. He's that guy who gave the trucker head in exchange for a ride in that Jay and Silent Bob from Clerks lame movie, thus ripping off a scene from Big Trouble by Dave Barry.

      And the only reason I know that about that movie is that I watched the ad on TV, of course. From 7 words you can't say to sucking cock on prime time TV. Quite a change in our country in the last 40 years, eh?

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    21. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eddie Izzard is an Azerbaijani fucking genius!

  3. Sheeit by Jamal+von+Bismarck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Melikes Izzardboi. Mewishes he be swell and all in 'tis bountyful personae. Dr Who be rockin da shizzles tambien, much respect.

    1. Re:Sheeit by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      fuck you

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Sheeit by playtime222 · · Score: 1

      You just know this guy is really white... :)

  4. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0276447/

    IMDB Is Your Friend.

  5. Actually by gdav · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bill Nighy is the front runner. Tom Baker was just voicing his opinion. See the Times.

    1. Re:Actually by jweatherley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, Tom Baker is great but he is as mad as a crate full of squirrels. Ananova reports that he reckons Melinda Messenger would make a good assisstant because:

      'Melinda would be good as she can scream and has bosoms. It doesn't really matter if she can act.'

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    2. Re:Actually by TomV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tom's been on a bit of a media blitz recently. Note that Tom, back when he was the incumbent, suggested that the Doctor should have a talking cabbage as a companion.

      At this ridiculously early stage in proceedings, I'm rather in favour of Bill Nighy for the part, and there seem to have been a few leaks suggesting this is Russell Davies' feeling too. He seems t ohave let it slip in conversation with Doctor Who Magazine editor Clayton Hickman, and has mentined it elsewhere as well.

      But let it not be forgotten that Eddie Izzard has been branching out into very serious drama recently and has turned out to be a very capable and powerful actor, so if he gets the part, no worries.

      But seriously, Tom's not into facts, Tom's into stimulating interesting conversation. and here we are, interested, and conversing :-)

      tV

    3. Re:Actually by arb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Tom Baker is great but he is as mad as a crate full of squirrels. Ananova reports that he reckons Melinda Messenger would make a good assisstant because:

      'Melinda would be good as she can scream and has bosoms. It doesn't really matter if she can act.'


      I think his assessment is not too far off the mark. Very few of the past assistants could act, and Melinda does have bosoms - quite nice ones in fact! ;-)

    4. Re:Actually by Amanset · · Score: 1

      Well, the ever-groovy The Sun thinks it will be that chap who played Egg on This Life according to this story.

      I think we can excuse any non-Brits for not knowing who he is.

    5. Re:Actually by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > But seriously, Tom's not into facts, Tom's into stimulating interesting conversation. and here we are, interested, and conversing :-)

      --Mod parent +1 Insightful

      --Agreed, until we hear an official public announcement everything is up in the air. Personally I won't put stock in anything I hear (as far as articles like this go) until the 1st episode is in the can and on its way to distributors. Until they finish the 1st part of the final product, ANYTHING can change.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    6. Re:Actually by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      they're not real you twat

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Actually by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      Bill Nighy is the front runner.

      The only logical choice for the new Dr Who is that quintessential English gentleman, Chris Eubank.

    8. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point.

    9. Re:Actually by arb · · Score: 1

      So? Who cares if they're real or not? They look okay to me.

    10. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eubank is not a gentleman by any stretch of the imagination. He is arrogant, purile and a bully. He certainly is not a Gentleman.

    11. Re:Actually by Tet · · Score: 1

      Please don't even mention that. Someone might take you seriously, and I shudden are the mere thought of it...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    12. Re:Actually by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

      Actually... I vote for Bill Nye (The Science Guy).
      The show could be educational as well as weird!

    13. Re:Actually by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just proves that you're only ever going to LOOK at women's breasts...

      Beggars aren't usually good choosers.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    14. Re:Actually by lone_marauder · · Score: 1
      Note that Tom, back when he was the incumbent, suggested that the Doctor should have a talking cabbage as a companion.

      Well, they did seem to go for this with regard to his arch enemy.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    15. Re:Actually by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Bill Nighy is the front runner.

      Excellent! I always thought the Science Guy would make a great Doctor.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    16. Re:Actually by pyros · · Score: 1

      Not Bill Nye, Bill Nighy. Viktor in Underworld, and the singer in Still Crazy.

    17. Re:Actually by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      they're not real you twat

      I have to go with the "Man Show" on this. If you can grab them, they're real.

    18. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's safe to say that no one here is going to do anything but look at those ones in particular.

    19. Re:Actually by starfish23 · · Score: 1

      I vote for Jon Tickle from BB4!

    20. Re:Actually by drauh · · Score: 1

      Heh. Yeah, he is mad. See this: http://www.diepunyhumans.com/archives/006506.html

      (Symphony is a furniture company...)

      --
      This is a tautology.
    21. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a guy who is so smart and nerdy as to have a .sig suggesting that about red and blue, you're pretty damned stupid. (Unless you're English, in which case not knowing the lame joke about Bill Nye, Science Guy, is understandable.)

    22. Re:Actually by G-funk · · Score: 1

      'Melinda would be good as she can scream and has bosoms. It doesn't really matter if she can act.'

      What's wrong with that? Sarah was the best assistant, and what does she do apart form scream an d look good?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    23. Re:Actually by oniony · · Score: 1

      And just think how many Opterons you could make from the silicon...

      --

      Powered by onion juice.

    24. Re:Actually by mink · · Score: 1

      "Mad as a crate of squirrels" is an important thing for acting characters such as Captain Rum.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  6. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by decaying · · Score: 1, Informative

    The filming of Red Dwarf is due to start May 2004.... it keeps getting pushed back....

    --
    ----- One piece short of Legoland
  7. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I have to turn on my TV?

    What's a tv?

    Hmmmm...

    1. Re:Damn by timelady · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      tv is an old fashioned version of streaming multimedia content.

      --
      Nothing - well thats something.
  8. eddie izzard? by timelady · · Score: 2, Informative

    tom's always been noted for leg pulling. richard e grant has the best qualifications, imho!

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
    1. Re:eddie izzard? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tom was just a little off. Bill Nighy is going to be the doctor and Eddie will put on a dress and play his assistant.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:eddie izzard? by Biscit · · Score: 1
      Now we start with the Bill Nighy rumours?

      Tom is as we said a little bit mad, and knows no more than the rest of us.

      BTW people are also talking about Alan Davies (of Jonathan Creek fame), Richard E Grant, and Stephen Fry. Alan said on daytime TV his next project is "Not exactly new".

    3. Re:eddie izzard? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Alan said on daytime TV his next project is "Not exactly new".

      Ground Force?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  9. Nope. by sakusha · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not going to happen. Tom Baker is pulling your leg. And you fell for it.

    1. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who got first post on this article, I'd like to point out that I did correctly predict that the post would be +5 informative over a half hour ago. (Although it's only at +4 informative as I'm posting this.)

    2. Re:Nope. by khallow · · Score: 1
      Not going to happen. Tom Baker is pulling your leg. And you fell for it.

      And the BBC reported it. Doesn't get any better than that.

    3. Re:Nope. by sakusha · · Score: 1

      And even I, who posted the comment, am appalled that it had +5 mods.

  10. This sucks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cross-dressing comedian in the new Doctor Who? What's with that? I thought the doctor was supposed to be a non-sexual character, but I just knew there'd be some kind of homosexual agenda in the new Doctor Who. It kind of ruins it, because I thought Richard Grant would be a much better choice for the new doctor. I realize it might not be the way modern TV is done to not have a character like the Doctor interact sexually, but it would ruin the series, I think, if he did. Don't screw the series over.

    1. Re:This sucks.. by timelady · · Score: 1

      the whole ambiguous sexual aspect of the doctor was part of his alienness, anyway. geez, look at how crappy the appalling movie was* with its crap of trying to make the doctor half human, and attracted to grace. saints preserve us, NO!
      *paul mcgann WAS a great doctor, bad script not his fault!

      --
      Nothing - well thats something.
    2. Re:This sucks.. by JonStewart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Izzard isn't gay.

    3. Re:This sucks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just replying to this moron since I accidentally modded him up, not down.

    4. Re:This sucks.. by .gary.mchugh. · · Score: 1

      Um,..

      transvestite does not equal homosexual..

      tv /= homo

      as well you know..

      or should know, before you do/say anything rash! Take that you anonymous closet queen! :)

  11. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by Sad+Loser · · Score: 1


    I thought they were all in prison. Well one of them anyway.
    Anyway why hasn't Richard E Grant of the legendary Withnail and I got the role?

    --
    Humorous signatures are over-rated.
  12. but wait, there's more by mentaiko · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ok, let's get this straight. The BBC news division is reporting that Tom Baker made this claim, which has been denied, in turn, by somebody back at the BBC entertainment division.

    So I think this can still be filed under "rumors", same as 4 days ago when this appeared on the bbc.co.uk website. Way to stay on top of late-breaking news, /.

    1. Re:but wait, there's more by prell · · Score: 1

      The news on slashdot is only as good as the contributors and editors, and does not really have the resources afforded to "genuine" news sources, so I tend to cut it a little slack. It's not really a news site; it's more of a community weblog with editors.

    2. Re:but wait, there's more by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      It's even better than that - the story was originally run in The Sun! http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-%202003452301 ,00.html

      I remember someone mentioning that Tom Baker once hinted that the next Doctor might be a woman (that would've been for the 5th Doctor). He did it purely to screw with everyone.

      And it worked. Again.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  13. It's about 15 years too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Dr. Who loving baby boomers are toooooo old to be interested.

    1. Re:It's about 15 years too late by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ??? Baby Boomers? What about GenXers? I'm a little too young to be Generation X, but I know a few who are just as into Dr. Who as I am (born circa 1970).

    2. Re:It's about 15 years too late by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      ??? Baby Boomers? What about GenXers? I'm a little too young to be Generation X, but I know a few who are just as into Dr. Who as I am (born circa 1970).

      If you were born circa 1970, you're pretty firmly GenX, actually on the older end of GenX.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    3. Re:It's about 15 years too late by TomV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the Dr. Who loving baby boomers are toooooo old to be interested.

      Alternatively, the Dr. Who loving baby boomers are now old enough to have kids to watch with,and t oappreciate that the show is primarily for their kids, and only secondarily for them too :-)

      Remember that 'family viewing' is the BBC's Holy Grail here. It's not us thirty-year-olds who were viewers first time round the BBC is interested in, it's not 18-25 genre-fans, the idea seems to be to get back to the 1970's when over half the British viewing public used to sit down as a family after the football results and before the big gameshow to watch Doctor Who together, as a family.

    4. Re:It's about 15 years too late by unitron · · Score: 1
      "It's about 15 years too late ...the Dr. Who loving baby boomers are toooooo old to be interested."

      No, we aren't.

      Of course it'll probably be another 15 years before PBS or somebody actually shows the new episodes in the states. :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:It's about 15 years too late by GypC · · Score: 1

      EH? The baby boomers are old enough to have grandchildren to watch with.

    6. Re:It's about 15 years too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess Dr Who is much much better than a baby boomer music concernt by the Rolling 'kidney' Stones.

      Die boomer music

  14. Thou be failings by Jamal+von+Bismarck · · Score: 0

    Ja FP be fine, but yo attitude be whiny an shit. Betta lay low punkstaboi.

    1. Re:Thou be failings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whiny? I'm boastful. Big difference there. As far as laying low, I don't think I'll have much of a choice for the next 72 hours (or anyone else in this building either.)

    2. Re:Thou be failings by Jamal+von+Bismarck · · Score: 0

      Mesaid you be whiny just like some lil gurl. "Gna gna, me be FP, blablabla" an shit. Troll be a art, you shaint give da bad name to 'tis. Respect for the FP tho mate.

    3. Re:Thou be failings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't think that's considered whining, but thanks, and much love y0

    4. Re:Thou be failings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are still a fuckwit moron who thinks that just because he got his one and only FP that he is the shit...

      Yeah, like you'll ever get first post. If by some luck of the draw you someday do, I sincerely hope for your sake that you make the most of it when you get it.

  15. Slashdot.... by oPless · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    News for Nerds, News from Last Week.

    Slow day guys ? Or just a long Submission Queue?

    Seriously tho, if the reports are true, Eddie Izzard woul, IMHO, be a fantastic Dr Who.

    About bloody time BBC ! What took you so long to listen to the loyal fanbase?

    I'm a bit worried BBC Wales is looking after the project tho.

    Ah well, something to look forward to I suppose.

    1. Re:Slashdot.... by TomV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      News for Nerds, News from Last Week.

      Ah, strictly, the news from last week was 'Doctor Who coming back to Saturday nights'. The Eddie Izzard rumour's a smidge more recent (middle of last week rather than 2 fridays back.

      About bloody time BBC ! What took you so long to listen to the loyal fanbase?

      As part of the loyal fanbase for the last thirty years, I'd say what took so long was for us, the loyal fanbase, to stop pestering them, harassing them, sending hatemail, insulting their intelligence, claiming that we knew better than them what makes good TV, flooding their switchboards with flame-calls every time they mentioned the show... Eventually we calmed down and started acting more like mature adults. These new stories, I sincerely hope, will NOT be for the likes of me. When I was a happy little 8 year of viewer/fan, Doctor Who wasn't made for people in their thirties with an unhealthy interest in vintage TV shows, and I am absolutely confident that Russell Davies won't be making a show for me (and himself for that matter).

      Also my personal view on 'what turned it' - the original viewers (not fans, viewers) grew up and created a new generation of potential child viewers. There needed to be a critical mass of 8-14 year olds who'd never seen the show, but with parents who remembered it, and that was always going to take a while. Remember that the key requirement here is for 'family viewing' - they were waiting for those families to be ready. No 8-year-olds? It's not Doctor Who then.

      I'm a bit worried BBC Wales is looking after the project tho.
      No worries there. The BBC's much more decentralised now than it was when Doctor Who was last made, and a lot of productions are sponsored from one of the regions. The particular production department involved usually doesn't imply location, setting, casting or any of that. BBC Wales films stuff in England, Scotland, Wales, wherever. As does BBC Sctoland, and so on.

      tV

    2. Re:Slashdot.... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rational decision making and logical argument has no place here at Slashdot, what you're supposed to write is something unbelievably stupid like:-

      "Yay! Edide Izzadr is teh r0xors!!!!"

      See?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Slashdot.... by mlk · · Score: 1

      But that was for the old gernation of slashdot, not we have to grow up, and type:

      "A11 R bazez be10NGz t0 uz!"

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:Slashdot.... by oPless · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I unreservedly Apologize.

      Teh Izzard is teh R0x0r5!111!!

    5. Re:Slashdot.... by oPless · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking

      "Last Updated: Thursday, 2 October, 2003, 12:54 GMT 13:54 UK"

      *Is* last week.

      And you know what those welsh are like, y'know, what with the sheep and all.

    6. Re:Slashdot.... by oPless · · Score: 1

      ok now I'm confused.

  16. Re:Insider info on who the new doctor really will by ari_j · · Score: 0, Troll
  17. When Baby Black Jesus Was Born... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun Was There!

    In other words, I'm just pointing out that the British tabloid had picked this up first, but I'll be instantly modded to -1 troll for my subject line before anyone actually clicks the link. Oh well, I've got karma to bur-....nevermind. =P

  18. NO! That's Not The Doctor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it definately could be any of his fans.

  19. I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    if he's gonna plant a flag on every new planet he discovers?

    1. Re:I wonder.... by Rangerk8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe not, but I can't wait until he offers a Dalek "Cake or Death?"

      --
      "Where am I going, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
    2. Re:I wonder.... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see him offer to put daleks on spikes.

      "err eek errr eeek THUMP"

      Eh, you had to be there.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      & of course his new enemy, the Beekeeper!

      "Ahhhh! I'm covered in bees!"

    4. Re:I wonder.... by znaps · · Score: 1

      I'll be waiting for him to pull out his Hodododod.

    5. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just the Dalek babies mind you, I don't think he wants to struggle with the adults. It's the american dream.

  20. Re:Insider info on who the new doctor really will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know nobody will click on it. I posted it more out of humor and tradition than trying to get people to click on a blatant goatse.cx link. Trolls aren't that stupid. Fag.

  21. Who is is that Eddie Izzard ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pardon non-english people, but who is that Eddie Izzard person anyway ?

    1. Re:Who is is that Eddie Izzard ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very funny transvestite comedian. He did a great HBO comedy special called "Dressed to Kill." You can find the audio to it on kazaa.

    2. Re:Who is is that Eddie Izzard ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even better is his stand-up show "Glorious". buy the dvd. OBEY THE COWARD. BUY IT!!!

    3. Re:Who is is that Eddie Izzard ? by martinX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Greetings, non-internet person. Allow me to introduce you to Google.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  22. umm [btw, i was first post this article] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously you're not familiar with the stereotypical Dr. Who fan.

    Damn, forgot about that two minute thing. By the way, I was first poster in this article. I also posted the think about the pic of the new doctor that was actually a post of one of his fans.

  23. Tom Baker Selling Crappy Products by Effugas · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.boomspeed.com/kajardine/Tom_Baker-Comme rcial_Voiceover_Outtakes.mp3

    As Warren Ellis wrote on his blog (which of course is where I found this, right next to the mind-boggling sci-fi snippets), This Is Essential.

    For the curious, take the most regal sounding brit you've ever heard. Now make him sell something utterly absurd -- and give him the cojones to say so.

    Repeatedly.

    A new classic.

    --Dan

    --Dan

    1. Re:Tom Baker Selling Crappy Products by marko123 · · Score: 1

      Strikingly similar to (and sounds like a parody/homage) Orson Welles doing the same thing.

      Can't find the link off-hand.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  24. Lets ask him by skinfitz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well I'm off to see Mr Izzard next month - if I think on I'll ask him.

  25. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can not get to google's webpage, I think somewhere major there is a DNS entry messed up or something, all I can get is a page relating to http://www.cpanel.net/ that says "this website is not up". And when I try altavista.com as well, the same thing happens. What area are u located, geographically? im in the tristate area, (Southwestern Ohio) and I'm using Time Warner Cable Cincinnati's Roadrunner ISP. Anyone else with some details or explanations? Is cPanel trying to one up Verisign? Or are the 2 of us just noobs and don't realize we accidentaly turned on Microsoft's "Search Engine Optimizer" option (although i get the same problem in firebird and IE)

  26. Izzard would be excellent by tickticker · · Score: 1
    Izzard would fill in Bakers shoes well.

    I'm so happy they found someone I appreciate, I could just put on a dress and tell jokes in french.

    --
    If I allowed you to read this sig... it would burn your eyes out

  27. Paul McGann by Xetrov · · Score: 2

    I think Paul McGann would been cool in the series.

    1. Re:Paul McGann by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I agree. It also would have had the benefit of increased continuity, as well as not taking away yet another one of what are supposed to be a somewhat finite number of regenerations (the Master's shenanigans notwithstanding)

  28. correct sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...he's a transvestite. he has sex with women. he just dresses in women's clothes and tarts himself up a bit to look nice when he goes out.

    he's also one of the funniest men alive IMHO.

    so the question remains: what the fuck is Doctor Who? i'm not english so i don't get it. it's almost as confusing as how the dutch speak four languages and smoke marijuana but we can't even talk to our cab drivers.

    1. Re:correct sir... by darien · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who is interesting mostly because of what it's not. While shows like Star Trek and Blake's Seven provided groups of bombastic characters in exciting situations - sort of cowboys and indians in space - for the kids to idolise, the Doctor was always an alien, with no particular allegiance and no mission to speak of. He doesn't even have a gun. His adventures are often pedestrian, and for a lot of the time he observes rather than leading the action.

      While the production values were often pretty atrocious, and many of the stories amazingly overlong and dull, this was a breath of fresh air; and I think many of us feel that, in these days of Attack of the Clones and Terminator 3, we need to Doctor to bring some restraint and ambiguity back into our lives.

  29. WTF? by Jamal+von+Bismarck · · Score: 0

    'Tis be mein appreciation for da Izz and D.O.C.W.H.O. You modstas be retarded or sumthin', get da clue an some love or getda fuckat...

  30. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check your hosts file. there is some malware modifying it. You are not the only one with this problem.

  31. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in the Seattle area using Comcast cable for an ISP (formerly ATTBI). I am far from being a n00b and made it a point to turn off the msn search that automatically comes up. I also have not heard anything in the news about google or altavista experiencing a DoS attack, which was my first suspicion, but unless I am mistaken, /. would have been all over that one since it is the search engine most mentioned on this site. Anyone else experiencing the same problem?

  32. Dr Who - The Next Generation by quinkin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    OK so it's not a cross post from a trek fan... :)

    They have just started playing the original Dr Who in Australia again and I am getting a massive kick out of watching my son react the exact same way I did 25 years ago.

    If you have never watched Dr Who from behind your dad's back (cowering in fear everytime the cellophane alien or plastic dinosaur lurches into view) the you just haven't watched it right. :)

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
    1. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Do do dooooooooooo, do-do-doooo, do-dooo, do-do-dO DODODODO-DODODODO-DOdoodoodooooododododododo

      Well, it's Dr Who music you bastards.

    2. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you have never watched Dr Who from behind your dad's back (cowering in fear everytime the cellophane alien or plastic dinosaur lurches into view) the you just haven't watched it right. :)

      Heh, I remember doing that, hated those damn cybermen and the big fat guys with no neck that you had to stab in the back to kill them, they were freaky.

    3. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by watzinaneihm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Am I the only one around here who has never seen Doctor Who on TV but have read all the books? My favorite was Terrance Dicks books, usally large size fonts, clear and funny narration and the best stories. !!!
      Hope to see it this time. BTW. Any idea if BBC will put it on the International channel instead of all the local ones?

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    4. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? ALL the books? Last I checked there was something like 1400 Dr. Who Books. It's the largest book series in existence. If you've read them all then I'm very impressed.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    5. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by Kanon · · Score: 1

      I've read virtually all of them. The Target novels are very short and if you start young enough (I've been reading Doctor Who books for over 20 years) you can easily get through them all.

    6. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Of course not. My school library had a huge lot of them. I have read all the Terrance dicks books in the collection (Ok I never kept track, but i cant seem to find any I have not read) and many of the others I found in the town library.The books being small I could borrow and finish it off the same day and return it the next day. Kept it up for around a year and a half.
      So probably read not even 1/3rd of the total, if you say 1400 is the actual number of books.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    7. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Ahh!!! I bow to the master!!!!
      Just out of curiosity, who is your favorite author?

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    8. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative
      the big fat guys with no neck that you had to stab in the back to kill them
      Sontarans.

      God, I'm such a nerd.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by goon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah it's kinda fun to watch the 2yo & 5yo run around the house shouting *EXTERMINATE* and asking questions about the Tardis travelling through worm holes.

      blast the ABC for voicing over the end credits though - bloody ads :(

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    10. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by ralphclark · · Score: 1
      OK so it's not a cross post from a trek fan


      No, it's cross dressing from a trek fan.


      While I'm on the subject, has anybody else seen Izzard's hilarious Trek send-up routine? And more importantly, which of his videos is it on? I've bought two so far, and still no luck :o\

    11. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by TomV · · Score: 1

      Ah, now the Targets were the original mainstream novelisations, and were the major thing I used to spend my pocket money on when I was a kid.

      After the cancellation, Virgin Books got the publishing rights and did a long series of 'New Adventures' with the McCoy Doctor, plus 'Missing Adventures' with the others, slotted into the existing continuity. Virgin lost the deal at the time of the TV Movie, when the BBC reclaimed it and started their ranges, the 'EDAs' (Eighth Doctor Adventures') with the McGann version, and the 'PDAs' (Past Doctor Adventures) with the others. These ranges are still going, one a month, with the latest EDA, "Emotional Chemistry" by Simon A Forward, due out later this week.

      Then there are the novellas from Telos Publishing, the Faction Paradox spinoffs from Mad Norwegian Press, and almost certainly more that I'm not aware of.

      That's excluding pure unendorsed fanfic.

      So in the 'classical' sense, you're right in saying you've read 'all the Doctor Who books' ('classical' implying 'Target novelisation of TV stories') and in the wider sense the other chap's right that there are many hundereds of other books you've not yet enjoyed - lucky you!

      tV

    12. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by Kanon · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying I've just read the Target novels. I have a full set of Virgin novels (Read them all) and an almost complete set of the BBC novels that came afterwards.

      I also have all the Telos novelas and I'm about to order the Faction Paradox spinoffs (Although they aren't strictly speaking Who anymore)

    13. Re:Dr Who - The Next Generation by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Sontarans are awsome. The 6 part 'Invasion of Time' was one of my favs.

  33. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U R vary stupid plz fx thx

    seriously stop using fucking windoze its not secure

  34. do you got flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that squrll was covered in makeup! -EE

  35. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by decaying · · Score: 1

    Craig Charles was on remand years back.... pre-season 7

    hehehe Pies fan.....

    --
    ----- One piece short of Legoland
  36. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blow me bitch. I live in a free country and am free to use which operating system I choose to.

    And learn how to fucking spell

  37. Those wacky Englanders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The new series is being scripted by Queer As Folk creator Russell T Davies for BBC Wales, which is behind the new series."

    Is there a typo in there anywhere?

  38. Ghetto Pig Lattin (off topic) by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I didn't do any actual research , but I have come to realization that all the izzle-speak is nothing but "pig-latin from the hood". It's got the same basic *kind* of substitution rules and about the same information kenitics [data compression is to elaboration, as consicice word choice is to izzlizing] given the number of nonsense-symbols that can be added to the informaion stream.

    So white people stole jaz from black people, and now black people have stolen pig-latin from white people.

    Who are the better theives? 8-)

    I would have recommended they steal something else, like investment banking, but most black people I know are too honest for investment banking. /sardonic-but-evil-grin

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
    1. Re:Ghetto Pig Lattin (off topic) by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      This stuff makes for good encryption tho. Understanding this stuff in real-time is a challenge. It would be an interesting research paper, if the researchers would stop getting shot.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    2. Re:Ghetto Pig Lattin (off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think we should just call it even and all get along. i got first post this article btw.

    3. Re:Ghetto Pig Lattin (off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This stuff makes for good encryption tho.

      ph0r 5h1zz|_3 |\/|4 n1zz|_3

  39. Re:ANYBODY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be better than the last moron who played him. Here's a hint: the show is called "doctor <B>WHO</B>, not "doctor spurting fecal fount". [emphasis mine]

    But, that movie was relatively good. If Dr. Who went more in that direction it probably would've been better.

    oh yeah, btw i got first post in this article. cool eh?

  40. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's this sort of attitude that is going to keep things like Linux, open source, freedom of information, and at the same time, privacy, down. Instead of talking down to people, you could explain what's wrong, and mention that it wouldn't happen in Linux because blah blah blah. No need to hate on us uninitiated. It's like one of those clubs where u need to know the secret handshake to get in and in order to know the secret handshake, u have to be in the club. Really, what does that do other than make us less likely to bother trying Linux. Luckily for me, I have a few friends who are going to a computer science school, and they have been actually helpful in getting me started on my transition from MS to OS. Until I can use linux to get stuff done on a regular basis, I need to keep winblows around. And all the name calling and condescending bullshit in the world can't even affect that fact. You need to extrapolate the idea of open source to all areas of your life, including your social skills.

  41. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by Lips · · Score: 1

    Richard E. Grant would be fantastic. He was very funny playing the Doctor in "Dr Who: The Curse of Fatal Death" for Comic Relief. But then Rowan Atkinson and Joanna Lumley also played the Doctor and were a riot!!!

  42. Re:Offtopic by orthogonal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has anyone else out there been having problems accessing Google or Altavista?

    Perhaps you're using malware: Check this thread out.

  43. Dr Who? by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dr Heimlich!

    1. Re:Dr Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really a maneuver yet, it's more of a gesture.

  44. and my big question is: by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who the frell is Eddie Izzard???! (excuse the cross-series reference).

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:and my big question is: by Zemran · · Score: 2, Funny

      A cross-series reference is appropriate, as Eddie Izzard is a cross-dresser :)

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:and my big question is: by slittle · · Score: 1

      I guess it really is Dr Who?

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    3. Re:and my big question is: by mlk · · Score: 1
      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    4. Re:and my big question is: by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1

      You might have seen him in 'Mystery Men' a couple of years ago. He played Tony P.

      Regards
      Luke

      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
    5. Re:and my big question is: by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1
      He's a British comedian, noteable for:

      a) being very funny (YMMV of course)

      b) wearing dresses (inspite of a long tradition of straight and gay British comedians dressing in drag he actually is a transvestite- and no apparently he's not gay, he's just a tranny).

      c) telling the least offensive jokes you've ever heard (you've heard the saying- 'comedy is always cruel'?- wrong!)

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:and my big question is: by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      He is very bi.

  45. Bah, lies... by Peterus7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tom Baker is just saying that because he's bitter that they told him the only part he'd be getting was that of Davros...

    1. Re:Bah, lies... by Wolfrider · · Score: 4, Interesting

      --What *I* think would be interesting, is if they brought Tom Baker back... ...as THE MASTER!!

      --People's JAWS would drop. Imagine the controversy, oh the hurly-burly!!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  46. Doctor... who?! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "How awesome is that!"

    Doctor who? Doctor WHO?! No, serious, I'm really asking, who's Eddie Izzard?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Doctor... who?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who the fuck is doctor who?

    2. Re:Doctor... who?! by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Informative


      Eddie Izzard is a commando Transvestite commedian Extremely funny, bizarre use of imagery, his act in French is funnier than his English act as his vocab is limited so it just sounds even more brilliant.

      Has done gigs in the US, been in a few films and is generally a bit of an all rounder. As a comic he'd be a sort of cross between Bill Hicks and Robin Williams, some politics, loads of insanity.

      Describes himself as a "militant liberal"... this means you storm the parliment building and start with the words

      "Its okay, we'll pay for all the damages"

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    3. Re:Doctor... who?! by jester · · Score: 1

      A TV who thinks he is funny but isn't. Gets lots of time on chat shows and game shows in UK based on very limited talent (IMHO :-)

    4. Re:Doctor... who?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...As a comic he'd be a sort of cross between Bill Hicks and Robin Williams, some politics, loads of insanity..."

      ...but funny.

    5. Re:Doctor... who?! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "A TV who thinks he is funny but isn't."

      Oh... you mean like Bob Saget?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Doctor... who?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Thats executive action transvestite.

      P.S: Did you know your cat is drilling behind your sofa?

  47. acting can be hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Melinda would be good as she can scream and has bosoms. It doesn't really matter if she can act.'

    I for one think it's a shame that no one has respect for natural talent these days. Tom Baker obviously could see past superficial behavioral traits such as acting ability, etc.

    --
    BTW, I got first post on this article.

    1. Re:acting can be hard by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      If you think those are "natural talent," I've got a bridge to sell you...

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  48. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, checked for all the usual suspects, ran Adaware and Hijackthis just for shits and giggles, and still the only thing that comes up is "cannot find server or DNS error"

    WHAT THE HELL SLASHDOT? IF THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH YOUR FAVORITE SEARCH ENGINE, WOULD YOU NOT HAVE REPORTED IT TO THE REST OF US? 'STUFF THAT MATTERS', MY ASS!

  49. If you don't know the difference... by IBitOBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...you arn't entitled to an opinion.

    Cross-dressing and "homosexual agenda"? Be serious. There is no deterministic relationship between the two outside bad steriotypes.

    Izzard is straight and tranvestite. I'm homosexual, dislike "drag shows" and pusshy-queen walking steriotypes, and would go naked before putting on a dress. Getting transvesties onto TV is about as far from my agenda as you can get. I don't want them not-there, but seeing a man in drag is like watching straight people kiss; it does nothing for me at all and generally looks a little creepy. 8-)

    Lumping people into broad categories just because you haven't bothered to do any fact-finding, and then claiming they lumped themselves and are now subscribed to a particular "agenda", is tiresome and childish.

    On a less-side note, I dislike anybody sexualizing characters that don't need it. It makes for bad literary construction as no mater how you slant sexuality you, by definition, slant it into a niche. Izzard could be a hoot as the doctor if he is capible of playing the character. I've seen him in suit and tie so I think he could pull off a nice excentric personality without injecting sex where it doesn't need to go.

    [FURTHER ASIDE]
    I once had an over-straight homophobe ask: "What do you mean 'phobia'? Why would I be afraid of some faggot?"

    My response: Clearly you are affraid that there are men out in the world who might think about you, and treat you, as badly as you think about and treat women.

    I have never met a homophobe, or indeed any man who used the phrase "homosexual agenda" (etc), that didn't also misstreat, marginalize, or rampently objectify every woman foolish enough to approach him.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
    1. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Viol8 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm afraid whether you like it or not , Drag Queen (read transvestite) and gay and solidly linked
      in the public psyche , and I'm afraid a lot of that is down to militant gays. How many times have you watched a gay pride carnival on TV only
      to see a bunch of (frankly ugly) blokes dressed up to look like female brazilian dancers or some other ultra feminine stereotype? Ok , I imagine 90% of gays would not
      want to look anything like that but if the self styled gay "representatives" keep pushing these stereotypes then people will absorb them.

    2. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I am the AC who has the reply right below yours, and I actually meant to say that, but forgot. I am actually bisexual, and though I really don't have any reason to advertise it anyway (I'm in a monogamous heterosexual relationship, so who cares who I might be interested in if I weren't in that relationship? People can assume whatever they want as far as I'm concerned), but the way gay groups on campus acted was certainly a strong motivator to disassociate myself from the LGBTA community.

    3. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cross-dressing and "homosexual agenda"? Be serious. There is no deterministic relationship between the two outside bad steriotypes.

      Mardi-gras ring any bells? It's a stereo-type that is generated by the queer community. Just check out any mardi gras or gay tv show.


      have never met a homophobe, or indeed any man who used the phrase "homosexual agenda" (etc), that didn't also misstreat, marginalize, or rampently objectify every woman foolish enough to approach him

      Either this is complete crap (and a huge generalization), or you need to get out more. People who for many reasons who disagree with the idea of homosexuality get labeled as homophobic. Thats just stupidity.

    4. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drag Queen and Transvestite are two very different things, and if you can't work out the difference between them then please stop talking on the subject, as you are not qualified.

    5. Re:If you don't know the difference... by neillewis · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between drag and transvestism. Most of the TVs I've met have been either straight or bisexual, in fact most TVs dress up at home and don't let even their wivess find out. When you see coverage of a pride parade on TV, they're going to pick the most outrageous spectacle. So I can see why it seems that way.

      I know it's off-off-topic but Izzard would be a fabulous strange and intelligent Dr Who, but I think unfortunately he"s probably got bigger fish to fry. My vote for fantasy Dr Who goes to Steve Buscemi.

    6. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think in your last paragraph, that you perhaps make the same mistake that you accuse others of making. NOT that I don't agree that some it is certainly true on occasion, but I don't think that its necessarily the case that misogyny is tied to "homophobia".

      Personally, I am quite happily married, and find that my wife is one of the best people I know. I am extremely grateful to have someone as intelligent and understanding as she is in my life.

      That said, I also happen to find homosexuality very objectionable. There is NO link between the two attitudes.

      Also, on top of this, and you won't believe me, I am NOT homophobic. I simply disagree with the lifestyle, but I don't think it is wise to ostracize anyone based on thier sexual (or any other) preference.

      It is, as someone (I think DesCartes) said, "I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to death, your right to say it". I am a believer in freedom of choice, that everyone can make thier own decision about what they do. I also happen to believe in an absolute good and an absolute evil.

      If, therefore, I really believe this, I must respect your choices and position on different ideas. It does NOT mean that I must agree with you on whether those are good decisions, but I respect your right to make them.

      I do believe that there are some people who are homosexual that DO have a political agenda, and will do everything they can to make it painfully obvious what they do in thier spare time. I for one, don't wish to know if someone is sleeping with another person of the same sex. Heck, to be really honest, I don't want to know about hetero relations either.

      Personally I find the idea of talking about other people's sex life rather disturbing. I also find the male-female couples you see plastered together on park benches (ever been to Lisbon?) quite disturbing. They should get a hotel room (except some aren't old enough to be able to rent one). But when I take my kid through the park, I shouldn't have to explain what "that couple" are doing, regardless if it's a hetero- or homo-sexual couple.

      Mod me up, mod me down. I say what I believe.

    7. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid whether you like it or not , Drag Queen (read transvestite) and gay and solidly linked
      in the public psyche


      Yes, but how is that different from what the grandparent post said?

      First, the grandparent post complained about people who are ignorant of the difference between gay and transvestite. Then, you stated that most people don't know the difference between gay and transvestite (e.g. that to most people, they're the same). It sounds to me like you're in agreement. :)

      Perhaps the difference is the implication in your post of "if most people believe something, it must be okay to believe it". I disagree with that. If 90% of people believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth, they're still just ignorant.

    8. Re:If you don't know the difference... by cafebabe · · Score: 1

      As Eddie himself says, most transvestites fancy girls. It's less "drag queen" than "male lesbian".

      --
      When violence rules the world outside / And the headlines make me want to cry / It's not the time to just keep quiet
    9. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      Definition time (as much as anything in the transgendered sphere can be defined...

      Transvestite: Man who (usually) gets a kick out of dressing as a woman. Not necessarily a sexual kick and some would describe it as expressing their feminine or sensual side. Most TVs are straight men.

      Drag Queen: Usually a gay man, normally very over the top in dress style (think Shirley Bassey gowns and serious makeup) and done as a form of entertainment.

      Transsexual: Man or woman who is mentally the opposite gender to their body. Think man in a womans body (or vice-versa) to try and get the idea. May or may not undergo gender reassignment surgery but will probably live out their life as their 'preferred' gender both at home and at work.

      This is not a good area for uncertain or inexact use of words ;)

    10. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Umm , a drag queen likes dressing in womens clothes and a transvestite likes um , dressing in womans clothes. Yeah , I can see the difference.

    11. Re:If you don't know the difference... by hey! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, who's fault is it that when gays have a public event, that the majority of gays get no coverage but the media focuses on a few drag queens? Or that the coverage of transvestites in these events is very, very superficial, calculated to to deliver the "shock" that of course, everyone is expecting?

      People don't like having their preconcetions challenged, and prefer to see images that comfort them by confirming their predjudices. Making people think has never been safe business practice from the days of Socrates up to the present.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:If you don't know the difference... by hellfire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't believe this was modded up. This argument is the same argument that a woman was raped because she dressed provokatively, that a hacker is inherently evil because the media has played up the word hacker, and that its okay if the public at large attaches a label to others with little information!!!!!

      See the movie "To Wong Fu, thanks for the Memories, Julie Newmar." There's a nice explanation between all the different "categories," if you permit me to categorize, of this type of psychology.

      There are men who are heterosexual who like to dress in women's clothing (transvestite). There are men who want to act or feel feminine, and some of them even get operations to be as close to female as possible (transsexual or transgendered). There are men who, in the words of Wesley Snipes character "Gay men who have way too much fashion sense" who are "drag queens" and dress up and act as women but do not do it for sexual pleasure.

      There are many different levels to homosexuality and lesbianism. As with just about every other goddamn thing on the planet, its complicated and layered and just because one is ignorant does not give anyone the right to make gross generalizations and say its okay to make them because that's the only thing they "see."

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    13. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      Drag queens dress as a women to entertain, transvestites do it for other reasons (i.e. they like the feel of ladies underwear *shivers*)

      Btw, the currently accepted politically correct term is transgendered, and no I'm not either. But I do have a drag name (even if I've never done it) of "Vaceline Di Yawn."

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    14. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Drag queens dress as a women to entertain, transvestites do it for other reasons (i.e. they like the feel of ladies underwear *shivers*)"

      So drag queens just decided to wear womens clothes purely as a career choice? Yeah right, pull the other one.

      "Btw, the currently accepted politically correct term is transgendered,"

      You can go shove your politically correct terminology where the sun doesn't shine.

      But I do have a drag name (even if I've never done it) of "Vaceline Di Yawn."

      Vaceline eh? Bet that'll have them rolling in the aisles. The yawn is appropriate however.

    15. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid whether you like it or not , Generalizers (read broad brush) and stupid are solidly linked in the public psyche , and I'm afraid a lot of that is down to militant Generalizers. How many times have you watched a street interview on TV only to see a bunch of (frankly ugly) blokes sounding like the combination of an autistic child and GW? Ok , I imagine 90% of Generalizers would not want to sound anything like that but if the self styled Generalizer "representatives" keep pushing these stereotypes then people will absorb them.

    16. Re:If you don't know the difference... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I think he would make a great doctor. Tom Baker "my favorite doctor" was very funny. Doctor Who has always had a bit of humor. Jelly baby?
      As for cross-dressing or homosexual agenda I really doubt it. Unless they have loons writing the script then it they will keep the doctor more or less a sexual. I mean in all honesty the odds of a timelord being turned on by a human is about the same as a human wanting to marry a Chimp.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    17. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "prefer to see images that comfort them by confirming their predjudices."

      I don't really think seeing a bunch of drag queens on TV comforts anyone. They get up peoples noses if anything. And what exactly do these
      events make people think about? That gays exist? No shit! The whole point of these events is for a bunch of egotists to stromp around irritating people , nothing else.

    18. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      > "Drag queens dress as a women to entertain, transvestites do it for other reasons (i.e. they like the feel of ladies underwear *shivers*)"

      > So drag queens just decided to wear womens clothes purely as a career choice? Yeah right, pull the other one.

      I didn't say as a career choice smartass, I said to entertain. Some do get paid for it, and actually they get quite a bit. Drag queens don't run around everywhere they go in their drag clothing like transgendered folk do, usually they'd only either do it in a gay club or when shopping for more ladies clothing.

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    19. Re:If you don't know the difference... by destine · · Score: 1

      This is a pretty funny thread. Actually if you go to a gay pride parade there is usually one or two floats that hold the drag queens. Drag queens are attention getters and performers. Media chooses to show them all the time because they are more sensational. I honestly don't know for sure but transvestites are spooky. They dress for sexual reasons. Transvestic fetishism is a sexual dysfunction as is Transsexuallity, though it has nothing to do with sex except in the medical term of sex=gender. Strange how they lump them together. If you see a transsexual float in a gay pride parade you'll just see a bunch of normally dressed women and men. Blue jeans and practical shoes mostly. We're kind of a boring bunch in all reality and most of us don't have a backbone to stand on so chances are you won't see a transsexual float unless it's a really large parade. Sad but true. Eddie Izzard I think would be more associated as a cross dresser as he just likes the clothes or maybe, and this is stretching it, a drag queen since he performs like that.

      A transsexual on the other hand is someone who, for reasons unknown(but I have my theories) believe that their gender somehow got mixed up. I am transsexual. Believe me, it's not sexual. Last time I had sex, normal male/female type sex where I was the male role, I cried all the way through it. Not a pleasant situation to be in. So it's really not proper to lump that up with sexual issues either. And to boot I'm a lesbian and I'm not alone. So you can't lump me in with guys who just want to be with straight guys. It doesn't work that way.

      In my experience, most gay men find drag queens a source of entertainment but really find women in general completely lacking anything that they find attractive(with the possible exceptions of boobs. They are hypnotic to a good portion of gay men for some strange reason.) Maybe that's a little harsh, a small portion of gay men are complete mysogenists as conversely a small portion of lesbians are complete man-haters. But the guy who said that 90% of gay men would rather go around naked than wear a dress, would hold fairly true.

      Anyway, as you can see there really is a good seperation between everything. But we need each other for various reasons, such as gay rights and transgender(lumping of crossdressing, transsexuality, and gender expression) are linked together politically. If for instance, a bill passes that protect gay rights it specifically will leave out gender rights currently so that if a gay men is a bit nellie or a gay woman is a butch they can be terminated based on gender expression. It seems the gay community tries very hard sometimes to seperate itself from the transgender community when both are needed together to provide for a more well-rounded alternative community

      I'll get off my soap box now.
      =)

      --
      Lissa Guillet

    20. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me like you are intrigued by them and are feigning "disgust" to hide your true feelings. Typical reaction of someone who may be bi-curious.

    21. Re:If you don't know the difference... by hey! · · Score: 1

      They get up peoples noses if anything.

      And you don't think that people can find the ability to feel superior to a bunch of "weirdos" comforting?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    22. Re:If you don't know the difference... by schon · · Score: 1

      This argument is the same argument that a woman was raped because she dressed provokatively

      No, it really isn't. If you believe that calling someone names and creating poor excuses for performing violent acts are equivalent, then you need to seriously re-examine your perceptions of the world around you. You're dangerously close to tripping Godwin.

      Perhaps you might say that it's the same as callingn a woman who dresses provocatively a "slut", but it's nowhere near excusing any violence perpetrated by anyone, anywhere.

    23. Re:If you don't know the difference... by hellfire · · Score: 1

      If you want to split hairs, I disagree. The previous post explicitly stated (wrongly) that it was the gay community's own fault for the perceptions that people have of them. In my example, its stating that its the woman's fault ofr her own rape.

      Both conclusions are wrong, because the actions of said object of the offense are not their own fault, but the fault of the people around them who are making false conclusions. Its obviously a difference in extremes, but then again, if you were a gay man in today's society, with all the gay bashing and homophobia that results from these perceptions, you might not think its all that extreme either.

      No Godwins were harmed in the forming of this conclusion my friend.

      --

      "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    24. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Slurm-V · · Score: 1

      Quite right. It's not homophobia - it's stupidity.

      --
      Of course it's going off the rails. How else is it ever going to fly?
    25. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see your "stupidity" arguement hold up under the concepts of evolution and survival of the species. Makes homosexuality out to be "stupidity" really.

    26. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That said, I also happen to find homosexuality very objectionable.

      Too true. Good on ya for posting. It seems that anyone who holds this reasonable and balanced view is unfairly labeled "homophobic". What a crock. The 'gay comunity' would like to label such as rednecks, bigots or whatever.

    27. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I also happen to believe in an absolute good and an absolute evil.

      Isn't it funny how people's definition of good and evil, right and wrong, are based on their own convictions, misbelieves or twisted world-view. What is fine for one person, is wrong for another. What Osama bin Laden did is acceptable to many, yet objectionable to many also. This is the kind of situation you get, when you don't have a definitive benchmark or standard to judge good and evil by. I too believe there is an absolute good and an absolute evil. What I feel or believe has nothing to do with this fact. We will all be judged be this standard when we die, regardless of our opinions.

    28. Re:If you don't know the difference... by Slurm-V · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see your "stupidity" arguement hold up under the concepts of evolution and survival of the species. Makes homosexuality out to be "stupidity" really.
      No, it only demonstrates your inability to see the larger picture. As you may not be aware, organism populations tend to expand to fill their available food source supplies - in terms of holding back our population growth (and our population is still growing despite homosexuality) non-breeders are actually doing us a favour by pushing backward the event of wider scarcity, permitting those genes with a desire to replicate the ability to do so with greater opportunity, comfort and chance of success.

      I suppose you could argue that their lack of breeding potential prevents possible successful mutations from entering the gene pool, but that assumes a) homosexuals don't breed (which is obviously a lie - take Oscar Wilde as a counter example, or babies created from frozen gametes) and b) that celibacy, vasectomies and hysterectomies are all in the same boat - which totally ignores the fact that the processes of evolution and survival are not always best served by mass spawnage alone (especially as we have little in the way of culling predators), but also by controlling the environment (for example, by agriculture) so that the genes of each generation are in a situation most conducive to survival (ie not necessarily an uncontrolled, overcrowded one where life is cheap).

      None of which has anything to do with the fact the fact that Eddie Izzard would undeniably be a good choice for the doctor (amongst other, equally good choices) so long as he didn't drag it up - I'm not sure the world (as indicated by the AC I replied to) is ready for that.

      Apologies for the off-topicness, I just wanted to see if the argument did hold up.
      --
      Of course it's going off the rails. How else is it ever going to fly?
    29. Re:If you don't know the difference... by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      "How many times have you watched a gay pride carnival on TV only
      to see a bunch of (frankly ugly) blokes dressed up to look like female brazilian dancers or some other ultra feminine stereotype?"

      Well, honestly, I'd suggest you blame the media for that. They tend to focus on the small minority of more 'colorful' participants in these parades.

      But really, homosexuality is orthogonal to cross-dressing. Yes, there are people who are in both camps. But that doesn't mean they're TIED TOGETHER. Yes, the public psyche might think they are, but they'd be wrong.

      It's not "gay representatives" that are "pushing" these stereotypes, frankly. It's a media distortion that picks out the fringes as if they were "representative". And of course anti-gay forces and homophobes with an anti-gay agenda seize on this and exploit it every chance they get. But you know something? If it wasn't this, they'd find or make up something else.

      Whatever.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  50. Tom Baker Making Prank Phone Calls by devphil · · Score: 3, Informative


    Okay, so it's not him, just someone who sounds a heckuva lot like him, pretending to be the Doctor. Doing it for a radio show.

    One day, called Tom Baker himself, who took it in stride as only a British Time Lord can.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Tom Baker Making Prank Phone Calls by Sabalon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even better was the one where he called Sylvester McCoy - I'm not sure if he ever realized it was a prank call.

  51. ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's funny. If I hadn't already gotten first post in this article I'd mod that up!

  52. Re:ANYBODY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'm just some random AC; so my opinion doesn't count for much. But anyway, well done on the FP, guy. Nice work.

  53. Orson Welles selling peas before its time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's here ...in July.

    Commentary here.

    Cheers.

  54. For my less enlightened countrymen... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eddie Izzard is this hip comedian from England. If you had an ounce of good taste you would know this.

    1. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by Nodatadj · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think the word you were looking for is "shit" not "hip"

    2. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by goon · · Score: 1

      hip or flippant? I remember watching Izzard on a parky interview with Nigella Lawson. Izzard came across as an ill educated tosser. He strikes me as being the *least intelligent* of the *doctors*. I don't know but I just can't get my head around a *dress wearing* doctor ... he's not even scottish.

      I guess the best thing to do is wait for his performance. If he is any good I'll eat my words. Interesting that Tom Baker has a positive spin on Izzard as a choice.

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    3. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      I'm still hoping that Alan Davies will get the part. He'd be perfect based on his stint on Jonathan Creek. However, I don't think he will get it simply because of the similarities between Jonathan Creek and Dr. Who. The major one being that Creek is a "hero" of sorts who doesn't use brawn but uses his brain.

    4. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by Bertie · · Score: 1

      I think if there's one thing you could never describe Eddie Izzard as, it's "ill-educated". Going to Paris and doing your whole show in French isn't exactly representative of your average Englishman's command of the French language.

    5. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by goon · · Score: 1

      Alan Davies
      Damn good choice that one. I cannot agree more. JC's
      very similiar in some ways as you suggest to the Dr Who character. Just one question, what happened to the Dr Who they used for the last Movie? Why isn't he continuing?

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    6. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by goon · · Score: 1

      yeah, language skills. I must admit that after reading a couple of bios he has not done a lot of television and may have been doing the Parky show to *shock*.

      As for doing a show in french, I havent seen the show. Just because he appeared to me be a *bit rough* around the edges doesn't prelude intelligence.

      --
      peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
    7. Re:For my less enlightened countrymen... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      He did a series of audio stories (not for broadcast) that had a few episodes. Apparently a lot of people liked them because I hear that he was supposed to be quite good.

  55. Rumours... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    I've heard three names as possibles for the next Doctor Who. Eddie, Richard E. Grant and Alan "Jonathan Creek" Davies. Fortunately I think they'd all rock in their own special way.

    1. Re:Rumours... by Metatron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd have to say when I heard about the series, my instinct said it had to be Alan Davies, I really think he'd do the role justice, however since I have seen this list of "candidates" I think Richard E Grant and Eddie Izzard could definitely do very different but just as good jobs. At the end of the day, they just better ensure that they get good scripts.

  56. Re:ANYBODY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.

    A lot of people don't realize how hard I've worked towards this. It's taken years for me to build up enough of a tolerance to type with this much alcohol in me.

  57. Re:yeah i rawk (maybe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It happens it was no one. But since such a silly story is supposed to be a gift for trolls, flamebaits and so on, you don't need to wonder who's going to post next. You may now wonder which stories the "editors" (janitors) are rejecting while approving such a crap.

  58. Actually I agree. by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    I vote for Nighy too. He just looks the part.. serious and much more realistic as a Time Lord. A transvestite would constantly kick your suspension of disbelief in the nuts.

    http://humans.bitofearth.net/bill/bill2.jpg

  59. Tom Baker Selling Crappy Products on a crappy site by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

    I think that is the biggest pap smear horseshit blog I've ever been on. Thanks for posting that waste of life loser existence wannabe goth retard crap.

  60. Gay, Transvestite, who cares? by taff^2 · · Score: 1

    I'd have thought that the intelligent readers of slashdot would have been above such stereotyping, but as they say, you live and learn.

    I for one hope the rumors about Eddie Izzard landing the part are true. I'm a huge fan of Izzard, and I think his surrealist views and dry delivery would make for an excellent Doctor Who.

    Having said that, Richard E Grant or Alan Davies would both suit the part well, although Izzard is still my favourite. Not only is he a very funny guy, but he's also quite good as an actor.

    Roll on 2005!

    --
    Karma: Bad. (As in Good?)
    1. Re:Gay, Transvestite, who cares? by Dewin+Cymraeg · · Score: 1
      Actually I don't think Eddie Izzard is gay. He's a straight transvestite.

      I'm a huge fan of Eddie Izzard too - my girlfriend and I are going to see him doing a gig December. But I'm not sure he's right for Dr Who. I thought they were going to go back to the roots, and I know his roots are camp, but I wonder if Eddie isn't just a little bit too camp?

      I think Alan Davies probably has the right level of campness to pull it off, or Richard E Grant - I like both of them.

      But hopefully it'll be someone who's willing to commit to a few series, not just six episodes.

    2. Re:Gay, Transvestite, who cares? by mlk · · Score: 1

      To quote the man himself:
      "[he's] a male lesbian".

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  61. Re:yeah i rawk (maybe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The other stuff is probably just as boring as well though. Probably stuff like this that I originally heard about this a couple weeks ago:

    slow night-type news article

    Not that it was a big story last week or anything, I'm just a step ahead of the game lately. Probably that's why I had first post this article.

  62. Eddie Izzard As Doctor Who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Yes, and who will be playing The Mare?

  63. i can just see the first episode by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 2, Funny

    'oh no the TARDIS is covered in bee's, run charlie run.....'

    ok people, get your quotes out..

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    1. Re:i can just see the first episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but just imagine the gun fights.

      BAD GUY: *ZAP*

      DR: Missed.

  64. Re:Tom Baker Selling Crappy Products on a crappy s by Effugas · · Score: 1

    Obviously not a man who Respects The Pig.

    --Dan

  65. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

    Keeps getting pushed back? Smeg!

  66. at least.. by Joff_NZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    All of the rumored guys would be good as the next Doctor..

    At least you know it won't be Ben Affleck.....

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
  67. We're way off topic but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Isn't "homophobia" a hatred of gays based on a fear of one's own homosexual urges? I don't think it's a fear of gay people.

    Going even farther off topic, I'd just like to make a comment on your last paragraph. When men are around other men, they play down their attachments and feelings for women. This is psychological fact. Actual poor treatment of women is absolutely wrong, but when women aren't present, men will often talk about them in a more callous manner. I played rugby for a year in college, and some of these guys would say the most sexist, derogatory stuff. Some of them actually were assholes, who ought not to be allowed within 100 feet of another human being. But there were also a good number who weren't that way. Some of them were just acting out a role, in the same way that guys who talk trash (during sports or videogames or whatever) may actually respect or even like their opponents.

    I bring this up because I often notice the same phenomena with respect to gay bashing. Yeah, "gay" or "faggot" are often used as insults, but in many cases it has no meaning. Just as calling someone a "bitch" is rarely meant to imply that the person in some way resembles a female dog, gay related insults are often much the same way. I recall reading an article in my freshman year about a gay guy on the soccer (I think it was soccer) team. The article talked about how there was a lot of worry that it would be a bad situation, because the guys on the team tended to use terms for homosexuals as insults. The players were frankly surprised it was even an issue. Basically what they said was "yeah, sure guys would say those things, but no one actually MEANT it." The gay teammember said basically "I do get treated a little differently, but not in a bad way. Most of these guys have never met anyone who was openly gay, so they're a little worried about saying something that will offend me. For the most part though, they're a great group of guys."

    Now, I went to a relatively enlightened school and I'm not trying to say that there is no such thing as sexism or homophobia. That is clearly untrue. Indeed, even saying derogatory things about groups of people does reveal prejudices. However, I'm also suggesting that perhaps people aren't always as bad as they seem. Sometimes, the way people act in one context is not a good indicator of their personal morals or deeply held beliefs.

    1. Re:We're way off topic but... by Shelrem · · Score: 1

      A) No, homophobia does not mean that you hate homosexuals due to repressed homosexual urges. It's quite simple. If you hate or are afraid of homosexuals, then you are homophobic. Look it up in the Oxford English Dictionary or any other dictionary for that matter. It may list repressed feelings as one of the definitions, but not to the exclusion of general hatred.

      B) I do know what you mean about terms becoming detached from their original meanings, as "fag" often is. However, using the terms "gay" or "homosexual" in a duragatory manner is not only a direct response to the modern emergence of homosexuality, but is also intended to be hurtful or dismissive my many people today, so by using it, others don't know which way you mean it, unlike the term "bitch."

      Let me put it another way: i'm of somewhat German descent, and i'm not anti-semetic. Does that make it alright for me to call my friends "dirty kikes?" What about in public?

      I'm not intending to be the language police, but i've heard the whole "calling someone queer/a fag/gay/homosexual in a duragatory manner doesn't mean i don't like people who are queer/fags/gays/homosexuals" and while i believe it doesn't, i can't help but assume that it usually does.

      b.c

  68. Bill Bailey by WebfishUK · · Score: 1

    Eddie is an excellent suggestion, particularly when Lenny Henrys name has also been mentioned (I ask you!). Another possibility would be Bill Bailey. He's mad enough but might lack the physical presence.

    --
    -- "Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!"
    1. Re:Bill Bailey by Stween · · Score: 1

      Bill looks crazy though, so naturally could play the Doctor.

      It might get predictable after 6 episodes, but if he just did his crazy-eye-look every few minutes, he'd be a passable Doctor.

    2. Re:Bill Bailey by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Via Spaced, I'll just float the idea of Simon Pegg.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Bill Bailey by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Avec le Darlek ?

  69. Who is Eddie Izzard? Never heard of him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enuff said.

  70. ... or a woman !!! by Metatron · · Score: 1

    Okay, so having seen some peoples (IMHO) very silly responses about a gay or a transvestite actor, I thought I'd share the other thing I have heard people talk about, (main reference being the BBC1 "points of view" show), and that is possibility of having a female doctor.

    Cat, Pidgeons ;)

    Discuss.

    1. Re:... or a woman !!! by Metatron · · Score: 1

      Notes:

      1. Yes, I know Eddie isn't gay.
      2. Yes, I know I can't spell pigeon
      3. I in no way expressed an opinion, although I'm not sure if the regeneration would allow for a sex change or not, which may or may not be the silliest part of this.
      4. I'll still go for Alan Davies, Richard E Grant and then Eddie Izzard in that order, I haven't been overly impressed with any of the other names mentioned.

  71. Erm, what?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...Eddie Izzard is to be the next doctor for the TV show that starts 2005. How awesome is that!"

    Do any of you non-Brits actually realise who Eddie Izzard is or is this just another shining example of people who have seen a Monty Python flick suddenly assuming they know everything about British comedy? Yep, thought so.

    1. Re:Erm, what?!?! by ender- · · Score: 1

      I know *of* Eddie Izzard. I saw his comedy act on tv one day. Damned near laughed myself to death. I've also seen an interview with him on not too long ago. He seemed like he wanted to get out of the comedy gig and into the acting gig [more than he already was].

      I'm sure there's a lot of his stuff I'm not aware of, but what I've seen is funny as hell...

      Ender

  72. I can't believe no-one has mentioned... by Jedi+Lofty · · Score: 1

    ... the perfect choice: Michael Palin! Eddie would be great, though, I'm sure. Who's that? Kev the Dalek? Steve the Dalek?

    --
    - There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't
  73. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, you're free to use whichever OS & browser you choose. However we're free to refuse to solve problems for you, especially problems which are caused by your own free choice. We're also free to tell you to stop using it, because the browser is question is a fucking peice of shit which allows ridiculous exploits which cause these problems. Even then, if you had one ounce of common sense you would be upto date with your patches from Microsoft, and you would not have this problem.

    In conclusion, stop using Internet Explorer as it is a peice of shit.

  74. Re:Offtopic by Eucaryont · · Score: 1

    When you say 'we' do you mean we as in 'we the pompous gasbag'?

  75. i might of watchd it by l1nux_guru · · Score: 1

    but not now cos hes so unfunny and he thinks hes funny cos he wears womans clothes. my dad used to write dr who fanfic but i only do red drawf

    1. Re:i might of watchd it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your Red Dwarf writings contain capital letters? How about punctuation where needed?

    2. Re:i might of watchd it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He knows better... he's just trying to imply that people who DO NOT want a gay/tv (or whatever...) Dr. Who are as young and dumb as his post appeared to be.

      What a waste.

      It would have been a believable troll if he made fewer punctuation errors.

    3. Re:i might of watchd it by l1nux_guru · · Score: 1

      I posted that at work and I'm not even supposed to read /. so i just type in and go go go! My punctuation sucks but the more i write the better I'm getting

  76. My old "Eddie Izzard" joke gains new relevance... by ayjay29 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When creating the first series:

    Director: We want to do a space-sci-fi-time-traveling show. We need a big spaceship, with lots of flashing lights, and fins and things.

    Props man: This is the BBC, scale it down a bit.

    Director: OK, we need a cheep plastic model spaceship that hangs on wires that we can do cheesy fly-by shots with.

    Props man: This is the BBC, scale it down a bit.

    Director: Well, we need something. What have you got?

    Props man: Well, we have this old police phone box from "Dixon of Dock Green.", it needs a lick of paint but...

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  77. REG should get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Richard E. Grant should get the gig - if only to complete the Withnail double (along with McGann). I can hear him now - "I'll say one thing for the Cybermen - they do keep a remarkable cellar!"

  78. Re:Bill Bailey (and The Dr Who Belgian Jazz sketch by TinheadNed · · Score: 1

    The only problem would be me expecting him to sing his song about Dr Qui et le TARDIS. And Davros 'Il n'est pas tres realistique'

    And no, Bill Bailey is a great comedian, but not a startling actor, perhaps because he just looks wrong and the audience expect his comedy

  79. Pure speculation by DuncMan · · Score: 2

    This story is based solely on some personal thoughts and speculation by legendary eccentric ex-Doctor Tom Baker. Someone has taken certain comments out of context and run with them. Read http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/news/drwho/2003/10/01/71 26.shtml carefully.

    To the best of my knowledge, Tom has no influence on the casting etc. of the new Doctor Who but he often has interesting insights to share (his autobiography is wonderful).

    Personally, I know Paul McGann will be excellent if he has the opportunity to continue as The Doctor and I intend to tell/ ask/ beg him to pursue the part whenever I see him or his agent. I don't see any reason why we need to move on to a new Doctor, though some of the rumoured candidates are promising.

    And anyone criticising the TV movie is deluded- it was excellent in so many, many ways (the TARDIS! the costumes! the dialogue! Sylvester! Paul!) and it's quite remarkable that so few concessions were made to the absurd desires of the American producers involved.

  80. Yes.. but no... but yes... but no.. by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 1

    "Conflicting... feelings rising... could be... amazing... could be disaster... confusing... thoughts..." ... Anyway, I think Izzard could actually be quite good. He is a good enough actor when needs be.

    Although personally I would have preferred Anthony Stewart Head. He has the image and presence of The Doctor and has done audio readings (I believe).

    --

    How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

    1. Re:Yes.. but no... but yes... but no.. by Laika · · Score: 1

      If anyone from Buffy even remotely comes close to this project, sheesh... Spare us all, please...

  81. Re:My old "Eddie Izzard" joke gains new relevance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually Garry Gillat (former Doctor Who magazine editor and, FWIW, gay as the day is long) once said that the difference between Doctor Who and Star Trek's attitude to special effects is how they (would) approach "The Power of Kroll".

    Writer: "There's a scene with a five mile high octopus."
    Doctor Who producer "Shit. We'll see what we can do"
    Star Trek producer "Make it a guy with a funny forehead"

  82. "So we eat God every morning?" by Sphaleotas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tom Baker confirms the story's complete rubbish in conversation with Danny Baker (http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/insideldn/dannybaker/ archive1_clipoftheday_2003.shtml [from 27'19"]). Sue McGregor is a senior BBC journalist.

    He was also responsible for the 1980s rumours that a woman was going to get the part.

    1. Re:"So we eat God every morning?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was also responsible for the 1980s rumours that a woman was going to get the part.

      He was ultimately proven correct on that one:

      http://www.table76.demon.co.uk/DrWho/CurseFD.htm l

  83. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I mean "We, the people that are being asked to solve this problem by someone who cannot solve ut themselves." If someone wants help, they should listen very carefully and stop complaining if they don't like the answer given.

  84. The Doctor is trying The Master's tricks? by Anomylous+Howard · · Score: 1

    I thought Time Lords only had 7 lives (regenerations). Haven't there already been 7 actors playing the Doctor? Shouldn't the Doc be dead by now?
    Or, is it 7 *RE*generations, meaning that the new doc will be the last?

    1. Re:The Doctor is trying The Master's tricks? by DuncMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Time Lords have 12 regenerations for a total of 13 lives (including the first life). Most Time Lords' lives can last thousands of years before needing a regeneration, but The Doctor leads dangerous lives... I'm also wondering whether these lives are consecutive, or a regeneration could be a shift sideways through 13 concurrent, individual, lives. It would allow for the numerous 'solo' adventures and eliminate certain continuity issues.

    2. Re:The Doctor is trying The Master's tricks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as of the last doctor who movie (the USA one) he went onto his 9th life I believe... he's got plenty of mileage if they stretch this one out a few years :)

    3. Re:The Doctor is trying The Master's tricks? by TomV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which would be all very well if it weren't for the 'how far back can you go, how many lives have you lived' scene in Brain Of Morbius, which suggests that the Tom Baker version was already number 12 (assuming, reasonably enough, that you can ignore Peter Cushing and Trevor Martin) by showing 8 pre-Hartnell Doctors (actually the faces of various members of the production team, for which they then had to compensate Equity). Except that the 'only 13 lives' bit was introduced rather later.

      Doctor Who continuity was never much more sturdy than the sets - or, to put it more positively, Doctor Who never let silly continuity niggles get in the way of telling a good story.

      Anyhow, if it came to the crunch, it's not as if the BBC would stop the show becasue they'd run out of permissible regenerations, is it?

      tV

  85. not eddy izzard!! by BloodAngel_Au · · Score: 1

    BBC has just announced that filming on a new Dr Who will begin in November with Richard E Grant in the main roll. His new story the Scream of the Shalka will be very different, It will debut on the internet www.bbc.co.uk/cult/drwho before being released on dvd and it will be animated. Richard played Dr Who in Dr Who and the curse of fatal death, a spoof story made for charity.

    1. Re:not eddy izzard!! by VdG · · Score: 1

      The Internet Dr Who has been common knowledge for ages and is not related to the new TV series, although it does give Richard E Grant a head start for the role of the new Doctor.

  86. Gay Daleks by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 1

    Does that mean we can have the Gay Daleks back, too?

    --
    Smegma.
    1. Re:Gay Daleks by therus121 · · Score: 1

      My god, i thought i was the only person who remembered TV Offal... was one of the funniest shows i ever saw, especially it was on when i was a (drunk) student... I'll never forget the "don't love me for fun girl" Boyz Zone 'cover... Therus

  87. Eddie Izzard? Dr. Who? Who is That? by triso · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    Is Dr. Who still being produced? I ask because it was/is the only example of excellent writing, okay acting and poor special effects in SF TV.

  88. Re:eddie izzard? - Bill Bailey by xgarb · · Score: 1

    Bill Bailey would be great. Kind of a musical, fckwitted version of Tom Baker.

  89. Tom Baker quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""You always feel Eddie Izzard knows something you don't, or has been somewhere you haven't been."

    But would you really want to go there anyway? He'd sure have me hiding behind the sofa.

  90. They should have gone with... by calbanese · · Score: 1

    Bill Haverchuck

  91. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download an updated AV/Spyware checker. You have something recent.

  92. Re:Eddie Izzard? Dr. Who? Who is That? by DuncMan · · Score: 2, Informative
    Is Dr. Who still being produced?

    As a TV series, Doctor Who ceased regular production in 1989, though a succesful and stunning TV Movie which introduced Paul McGann as the 8th Doctor in 1996. The franchise continues in numerous other media;

    • A series of audio dramas from Big Finish ( http://www.bigfinish.com/drwho/ )
    • Books from Virgin, the BBC, Telos, and Big Finish ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/doctorwho/books/ )
    • A long-running magazine every 4 weeks
    • DVD and VHS releases of stories
    • CD releases of stories with lost video
    I ask because it was/is the only example of excellent writing, okay acting and poor special effects in SF TV.

    Doctor Who showcased ingenious creativity in the face of limited resources. In an era of vacuous movies and series propped up by special effects (Star Trek: Enterprise is a rare exception), Doctor Who will always stand out. Little wonder so many people love the programme.

  93. 2005? Geez, go long.. by Cragen · · Score: 1

    1. Sorry. I cannot get excited about anything more than nine months away. 2005 might as well be a Y3K event to me. 2. BBC=>England=>!USA/Cox Cable == no BBCTV. zzzzt. Does Izzie do Ozzie? (yawn..) Meanwhile....

  94. assistants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But then Peri, the fifth doctor's final assistant and the sixth doctor's first, had big bosoms as well.

    But IMHO she had this awfully whiny voice, and was a pain in the neck. I though of her has having "two qualifications for the job."

    1. Re:assistants by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I'm an unrepentent Peri-ite. She was the best!

      The whiniest, though, was Mel. Her screams could shatter titanium. One time she was in some kind of force field bubble, and her screaming actually cracked my skull.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    2. Re:assistants by darien · · Score: 1

      her screaming actually cracked my skull.

      That would explain why you like Peri... :P

  95. NO NO NO by isorox · · Score: 1

    The new Dr Who should be Will Smith!

    Unless he's tied up being the next James Bond

  96. Tom Baker's upper lip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got a bunch of the Doctor Who DVD collections and have enjoyed them. Douglas Adams even wrote an episode. But one thing I have started to notice. His upper lip always has a sore on it. What' up with that? None of the other Whos had that.

  97. John Cleese! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Now there's a Doctor I could respect, follow, nay, even spit upon.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  98. Alright... by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    It's good to see an Executive Transvestite really getting somewhere in life!

  99. Eddie Izzard is a straight transvestite FWIW by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

    For the record, Izzard is heterosexual.

    1. Re:Eddie Izzard is a straight transvestite FWIW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, it wouldn't matter anyway, since the doctor NEVER has sex. If he did, that would wreck the show.

  100. This is JUST SPECULATION by shadowlight1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tom Baker was a great Dr. Who, but lately it seems he is a loon with moments of lucidity. Have any of you read his interview at the BBC?? It's hard for him to remember SEASONS of Dr Who at this point. Or, he was just pretending. Either way, he was a loon in the interview.

    It's much too early methinks (2 years out) for an actor to be chosen for Dr. Who.

    When Big Finnish, who does the Dr Who audio adventures, solicits scripts, they say "write it for any Doctor" and then it is customized to a new Doctor's persona after the actor is chosen. What this means, is any time between now and late 2004 a Doctor could be chosen, even with the script fleshed out. Naturally, to generate the most hype, people will be speculating on the actor (or actress!) to play the Doctor. Paul McGann, the 8th doctor who was in the Fox TV movie, has been quoted as saying he wants a FEMALE doctor this time around, or an African American one -- this doesn't mean it's going to happen -- it's just actors voicing their opinions.

    For the latest Dr Who news the best place to go, IMHO, is www.gallifreyone.com. It's a well-maintained fansite that seems to be tearing through the flurry of speculation and sticking to official BBC press releases.

    I can't wait for the Doctor to be back on TV.

    1. Re:This is JUST SPECULATION by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      I think this goes back to something Pertwee said - it's just a job. People come up to him, acting like they know him because they know all of his episodes, but to him it was just one of the many roles he has played.

      Probably same with Tom - it was just a period in his life - over 20 years ago even.

      It's the fans that come up with the questions such as in episode 98 you pressed this button to open the viewer in the tardis, but in ep 104, that switched opened the door - at what point did this change? Was it the tardis acting up, or did it get rewired?

      Gallifreyone.com is awsome!!!

      As for Doctors - just have to say it :) Rowan Atkinson did a good job in Curse of the Fatal Death and could probably do a good Doctor. Paul McGann was good and I wouldn't mind seeing him back (hate to waste regenerations everytime the BBC decides to try again) Lenny Henry, alluded to in another thread, would probably get me to fly to London on vacation just to watch the premiere :)

    2. Re:This is JUST SPECULATION by Dominic · · Score: 2, Funny


      > saying he wants a FEMALE doctor this time around,
      > or an African American one

      Wait a minute.. the Doctor changing skin colour I can understand, but why would be suddenly become American? That makes no sense at all...

  101. Re:Offtopic by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

    Congrats on your first post, but calm down will ya?

    as far as google from cincyrr .. I am getting there just fine. No problems on the east side of town at all.

    IHPBT , I don't care

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  102. brm brm *ciao* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    la singe est *sur* le tardis..

  103. designated screamer by mckwant · · Score: 1

    Don't laugh. I would swear that the Buffy TV series had a "designated screamer" position. Willow initially, then Cordelia up until she was replaced by Dawn.

    Great screams, and although I've never actually tested this out empirically, I'd wager the designated screamer, in its various incarnations, did at least 85% of the screaming in the series.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  104. EXTERMINATE, EXTERMINATE THE HOMOMPHOBES! by bodland · · Score: 0, Troll

    EXTERMINATE, EXTERMINATE!!

    1. Re:EXTERMINATE, EXTERMINATE THE HOMOMPHOBES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? It's not only FUNNY, but DESIRABLE. Would you have moded someone who said "exterminte the racists" down as a troll? Espeically if they were making a Dr. Who Daleks joke?? Please.

      MOD PARENT UP!

  105. The Doctor by panda · · Score: 1

    For me, the Doctor was and always will be as portrayed by Tom Baker. I guess it's just the age I was and the time that it made it to TV in the US, but Tom Baker is the first Doctor that I saw and the best.

    BTW, he also plays a very interesting Sherlock Holmes.

    Thing I like about Tom Baker is his wonderful sense of humor and style. He'll take a role that everyone expects to be played one way, and take it in some totally new direction. Very interesting actor to watch.

    As for who gets to play the Doctor next, I don't really care. It will be ages before we'll get to see him in the States. Heh, I may just have to plug the TV in again if Dr. Who returns.

    --
    Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
  106. You've been watching too much Eddie Izzard when... by bjorky · · Score: 1

    Daleks are called things like Kev or Steve. And you know that they make excellent plumbers because they've got that plunger-arm. Death or plumbing!

    --

    "Defenestration" is to throw out of a window; what's a word for throwing 'Windows' out of something?
  107. Hmm.... by inteller · · Score: 0

    .....first we are told it is being produced by the same guy who did Queer as Folk. Now they are getting a cross-dressing comedian. Who wants to place bets the first episode finds the Taurdus crashing in San Fran?

  108. How awsome is that? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    He seems a bit of a flake.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  109. The assistant is who we care about... by Druss.the.legend · · Score: 2

    I love Eddy Izzard - but lets face it Its the Dr's assistant that we all care about. She must be hot and able to screem. If she wore short skirts like Teela it would be a real advantage

    1. Re:The assistant is who we care about... by leoxx · · Score: 1

      You mean Leela, not Teela. Also, I though Romanadvoratrelundar (aka Romana) was the hottest sidekick myself. Who could forget her outfit in her very first scene! Magnificent!

    2. Re:The assistant is who we care about... by ewhac · · Score: 1

      ...lets face it Its the Dr's assistant that we all care about. She must be hot and able to screem [sic].

      No.

      After the easily-panicked Tegan, the whiny Peri, and the impossibly stupid and useless Mel, Ace/Dorothy was a welcome breath of fresh air.

      Tegan at least had the benefit of reasonable stories, so the peril in which she found herself was at least plausible, but her voice grated after a while. Peri, portrayed as a spoiled American, would just sit and whine most of the time. And do not get me started on Mel, a strawberry blonde candy-striper clumsily written into the show who would stand motionless four feet from the Imminent Peril and scream at it. Granted, she could shatter transparent aluminium panels at 400 paces, but this super-power was never used to great effect by the writers.

      Contrast with Ace. This woman did not take shit from anyone, and would blow you to smithereens as soon as look at you. ("Last one out's a gooey mess.") No idle simpering hostage, she. She was intelligent, resourceful and, while a bit chaotic, could always be relied upon to cause as much trouble for the bad guys as possible.

      The assistant needs to be an assistant, not a tool for cheap plot devices.

      Schwab

    3. Re:The assistant is who we care about... by schon · · Score: 1

      I though Romanadvoratrelundar (aka Romana) was the hottest sidekick myself.

      Yes, but I much preferred Lalla Ward (your link was to Mary Tamm) as Romana. She had a better sense of humor, and there was something oddly compelling about her..

  110. Wow by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    I come to /. and find a story about one of my fav comedians - how awesome is that?

    "Cake or death? Uh, cake please!"

    Yours truly,
    Jeff, the God of Biscuits

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  111. Will he say it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please let him ask a Darlek,
    Which is it?
    Cake, or Death!?

    1. Re:Will he say it? by schon · · Score: 1

      Please let him ask a Darlek

      A Darlek? You mean like this one? :o)

  112. Not work friendly by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    Ananova reports that he reckons Melinda Messenger would make a good assisstant because: [...]

    Whoa! Thanks for the cool image link and everything, but needs a "not work friendly" warning. :-)

    1. Re:Not work friendly by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

      Ill second that.... luckily my co-workers didnt catch that one...

  113. What about ...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carol Vorderman? I think she's make a great Dr - 'bout time they gave the gig to a chick!

  114. Talking cabbage by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Tom's been on a bit of a media blitz recently. Note that Tom, back when he was the incumbent, suggested that the Doctor should have a talking cabbage as a companion.

    And a talking cabbage would not have fit into Dr. Who perfectly because?

    a) It would have shown up the other aliens with amazing makeup work.

    b) Precludes irish companions as well because of the corned beef factor.

    c) Cabbages can't talk in real life.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Talking cabbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      c) Cabbages can't talk in real life.

      And there you have the basis of what's considered funny in the UK. If it doesn't happen in real life, it must be funny (or simply, anything absurd is funny).

  115. And what could be more surprising than... by Shoten · · Score: 1

    The 1st Battallion TARDISS Brigade?!?

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  116. if he performes in drag... by E_Let · · Score: 1

    they'll have to change the name of the show to "dr. what?!!?"

  117. i'll save you and eddie the trouble by tomalok · · Score: 1

    well, my wife and i went to see him in chicago on 2.oct... great show, though i'm still left wondering how attached his new breasts are -- whether they're actually implanted or if they're "lee press-on breasts". anyways, i digress.

    after the show, since we were at the back of the orchestra section, we nipped off for a few beverages at the wine bar across the street from the schubert theatre, and managed to get back across the street again in time to have the distinction of being the the last people to be allowed in to talk to eddie at the end of the night.

    the question was put to him, and he'd heard the rumor earlier in the day (perhaps by others who he'd talked with earlier that night), but he has not been contacted by the BBC regarding this matter. and yes, this apparently all started when tom baker put his name out there as an example of someone who he thought would make a good doctor who.

  118. Baker was misquoted by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    Baker didn't even make it as a claim. It's right there in the original article (the one this story links to misquotes him) that he was giving his opinion.

    Speaking of Tom Baker, a couple of recent links: an mp3 of Tom fooling around with a commercial voiceover that's been circulating on the blogs lately, and another website with some Dr. Who prank calls, comedy skits, and also that aforementioned outtakes mp3.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  119. Wow, you could not be more misinformed by name_already_taken · · Score: 1
    As someone who has been to several gay pride parades, and been in three of them, I can tell you that most of the people at these events are not dressed the way you describe in your post.

    The simple fact is that your local tv news people pick the most eye catching or outrageous image from each event they cover.

    A few years back the midwest AIDS Ride made a stop in a local town, and out of the hundreds of normally dressed folk the local paper found the one guy in a dress to photograph for the article.

    By far the vast majority gay guys have no interest in wearing womens' clothing.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  120. Tsk tsk... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

    "How awesome is that!"

    That's a question. Therefore, it should end with a question mark. Funny how that works.

  121. YES!!!! by Music+of+the+Spheres · · Score: 1

    "Och You can sit on the side of the Tardis. Look good in photographs..." I know - no-one will catch the reference but... Eddie Izzard would be perfect. Richard E. Grant takes second place only because I want to see him play 'the Master,' too! But please... not Jonathon Creek. He'd be like a more depressing clone of Tom Baker.

  122. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's super-cool

  123. Should add a new dimension.... by mormop · · Score: 1

    (Do your own metallic voice)

    Dalek 1: The dosctor is escaping. Stop him before he reaches the stairs

    Dalek 2: Don't worry, in those heels he's got as much chance of getting up them as we have.

    Top marks to Eddie - Bexhill's finest!

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  124. Cake or Death! by tomdarch · · Score: 1

    The Anglican Jihad has begun!

  125. How about Lenny Henry? by Tugar · · Score: 1

    Why not?
    Oh. You don't want a Black Doctor?

  126. Eddie Izzard would be great by ForsakenRegex · · Score: 1

    I've yet to see Eddie be anything but great, even in stuff that sucks. I think he's make a great Dr., regardless of the truth of the rumor.

    --
    "A man talking sense to himself is no madder than a man talking nonsense not to himself."
  127. Re:Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Asshole,

    The trolling community would like to thank you for participating in our online experiment concerning OS choice and gay sex. Your insight has helped a great deal in our research, and as a token of our appreciation, we would like to inform you that...

    YHBT, HAND

    P.S. You don't need IE to browse the web fucktard. If it's a flash site where Mozilla doesn't work, then it's not worth seeing anyway ... really.

  128. Re: Cowering behind dad (or the sofa) by matthewd · · Score: 1

    Do kids really do this sort of thing now a days?

    Dr. Who just seems so tame in comparison to what kids are exposed to now, e.g. the Jurassic Parks, Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, etc. I mean I started my daugher on Jurassic Park when she was four, and although it scared her the first time she loved watching it again and again. I mean she could only watch Toy Story so many times before getting tired of it. And my son loves to shout "Off with his head!" (Alice in Wonderland) and laughs hysterically at the end of Fellowship when Aragon beheads the orc.

    I guess maybe some parents just decide to desensitize their kids much later in life...

  129. great... by PrImED73 · · Score: 1

    eddie izzard as doctor who, now all we need is bill bailey as avon in the remake of blakes 7

    --
    --Mods giveth, Mods taketh away--
  130. Awesome ? by The+Mgt · · Score: 1

    What, like a hot dog ?

  131. Re:HHGTTG, Dr Who - What about Red Dwarf by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    'cos Richard E Grant cannot act to save his life and is extremely annoying !

  132. Very short episode... by suss · · Score: 1

    That will be one short new episode...

    The tardis materializes, except it's a fridge now instead of a phonebooth...
    Eddie gets out in full drag saying 'Hello sailors! Where are the fishburgers, i have some jam for them!'

    Thousands of angry Doctor Who fans enter the stage, ripping Eddie to shreds, Michael Grade(*) in the shadows, laughing maniacally

    The end.


    (*) Michael Grade is the BBC1 controller that cancelled Doctor Who at its peak, maybe a bit too obscure a reference.

  133. Sounds like he's been reading Rankin by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
    "suggested that the Doctor should have a talking cabbage as a companion"

    Already been done - Armaggeddon: The Musical

    .02

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  134. Or... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    "I like my assistants like I like my coffee - in a plastic cup"

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  135. What did you find the best in fear defense ? by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    Personally I found hiding behind a pillow was sufficient protection ... though when I used to watch the incredible hulk I found I had to use a duvet at times ;-)

  136. Eddie Izzard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How awesome is that!

    Only just slightly less awesome than getting my balls caught in an elevator door and hearing someone plan alternating repeat visits to the basement and roof.

  137. Tom Baker on London Tonight by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    Tom was interview on the London regional news programme on BBC-1 last week, "London Tonight". Hovering around were the obligatory Dalek and K9. Tom was in top form, as eccentric as ever, but was only given two minutes at the end of the show. He acted as if Eddie Izzard was going to be THE Doctor, and acted as if he had been given hallowed news. However, it was only speculation. He dismissed the suggestion that Richard E.Grant would be the next Doctor with the phrase, "Oh, Christ!", and dismissed the notion that the new series would have a James Bond style, the whole genre of which he rubbished as "tedium". Tom's interview was only a few minutes long. I wonder why?!

  138. That link is SO damn funny! by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

    My respect for Tom Baker has only increased!

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  139. Talking Cabbages (Re:Actually) by crataegus · · Score: 1

    Well, this was the 70s here. Didn't Davey Jones make his famous "God is a verb not a noun," comment in that decade?

    --
    DISCLAIMER: Use of this advanced computing technology does not imply an endorsement of Western industrial civilization.
  140. Sounds Great ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only problem is that it's not true. Ah well.

  141. Favorite Companions by TPFH · · Score: 1

    My favorite companions were Zoe, because she's smart, and Ace!, because she was always blowing stuff up.

    In The Pirate Planet the Doctor has been knocked unconcious and is having nightmares about Leela and woke up screaming "No more janus thorns! No more Janus thorns!" I wonder if a future incarnation of the Doctor will wake up screaming "No more Nitro-Nine!"

    I've never been a good judge of acting so I couldn't tell you if Wendy Padbury and Sophie Aldred were good actors.

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you