Slashdot Mirror


A Gator By Any Other Name

MFS! writes "CNet reports that Gator, everyone's favorite ad software, is changing its name to Claria. Gator's CEO says "We feel that the Claria Corporation name will allow us to better communicate the expanding breadth of offerings that we provide to consumers and advertisers." He fails to mention what "Claria" is supposed to mean or how it accomplishes this goal, but it seems that the name change may be no more than an attempt to distance the company from a moniker which has become involved in allegations of spyware."

373 comments

  1. Gator is evil by nucal · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... but I'd be happy to install Claria.

    1. Re:Gator is evil by Davak · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news... our weapons for cleaning this crap off have not changed their names:

      Spybot

      Ad-Ware

      Davak

    2. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      127.0.0.1 localhost
      127.0.0.1 ads.osdn.com
      127.0.0.1 claria.com
      127.0.0.1 gator.com

      nuff said.

      - Moomin

    3. Re:Gator is evil by anakin357 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work at a rather large ISP, and strangely enough, when there is obvious adware installed, when I tell them it's downloading advertisements and such, they actually beleive the ads are coming from websites they visit (sometimes ours).

      I actually had someone the other day accuse our homepage of popping up pornographic advertisements. The very first thing out of my mouth was, "Have you installed KaZaa?"

      He reluctantly agreed, and said "Oh, so it's KaZaa?"

      "Yep, you need to get rid of that junk"...

      Here's my point: People are stupid. Changing their name once every couple years lets them stay ahead of the curve, because remember, Chrismas is coming, and we'll have another ~5-10 million (guessing here) computer users on the internet. When a screen pops up saying would you like to syncronize your time, keep a calendar, be able to see the current weather conditions, etc etc, they think: "Well wouldn't that be cool?"

      The answer is no.

      --
      http://www.fsckin.com/
    4. Re:Gator is evil by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Bah! A bunch of corporate morphing net-kooks! I'd try to nomimate them for kook-of-the-month, but they'd probably sue me or something. (Another mark of kookery.) Next they'll probably threaten to invade Canada like Grubor, just you wait!

      Claria: Spyware by Kooks.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Gator is evil by Zugok · · Score: 1

      that is because it sounds somwehat similar to chlamydia

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    6. Re:Gator is evil by dytin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to be to nit-picky, but that should be Ad-Aware, not ad-ware, which is what gator's eWallet is.

    7. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be to nit-picky, but that should be Ad-Aware, not ad-ware, which is what gator's eWallet is.

      Trying to fool people into installing spyware -- shame on those darned viral marketers!

    8. Re:Gator is evil by Eccles · · Score: 1

      "Yep, you need to get rid of that junk"...

      And you didn't tell them about Kazaa Lite?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    9. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, it would only be informative if he knew what he was talking about. They are not going to be using only the domain name as a host.

    10. Re:Gator is evil by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      I hate having to change my sig...

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    11. Re:Gator is evil by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      It's amazing how much of a problem people have with these fundamental attribution errors. My company has been accused several times of adding people's email addresses to porn spam lists ("it couldn't have been anybody else, we bought stuff from you 3/4/20 days before we started getting porn spam!"), breaking computers ("my computer won't boot anymore, it must be your screensaver"), and so on.


      I know technology is confusing, but god, it's frustrating when no matter how hard you try to be honest and release good, useful products, you still get blamed for all the nasty shit that other people do out there.

    12. Re:Gator is evil by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Claria. Ask your IT department. It's time to ask your IT department. Ask about Claria.

      Claria side effects include bandwidth loss increased advertisement and loss of privacy if they continue or are bothersome check with your IT department contact your IT department immediately if your develop rapid or pounding disk access OS instability or unusual sluggishness while using this software.

      Claria. It's right for you.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    13. Re:Gator is evil by rossy · · Score: 1
      You are 100% right!

      You know, I think if I use Linux, I can sync my clock without pop ups... but I'm still stupid.

      --
      Ross Youngblood
    14. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Actually this would be better, since your browser doesn't have to contact your machine (or anything) each time the server is requested.

      127.0.0.1 localhost
      0.0.0.0 ads.osdn.com
      0.0.0.0 claria.com
      0.0.0.0 gator.com

    15. Re:Gator is evil by jafuser · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually this would be better, since your browser doesn't have to contact your machine (or anything) each time the server is requested.

      127.0.0.1 localhost
      0.0.0.0 ads.osdn.com
      0.0.0.0 claria.com
      0.0.0.0 gator.com


      I'm replying to this with full quotation, as the AC may not be noticed at Score 0, yet I'd like to see someone address why this is rarely recommended in place of 127.0.0.1.

      I've been using 0.0.0.0 for blocking hosts for a long while. It seems to result in faster page loads since the pending images don't hang the browser up. This is useful especially on websites where the text is not yet rendered in wait of size information for the pending images.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    16. Re:Gator is evil by Condor7 · · Score: 1



      Congratulations! You just got modded "Informative" for not getting the joke.

    17. Re:Gator is evil by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Must be nice.
      I work in tech support and we're not allowed to tell people that KaZaa is spyware riddled garbage. I guess management is afraid we'll get sued.

      So I get to deal with, "This computer is slow! it's a piece of junk!" when they've brought it all on themselves by installing crap on it.

      Tell 'em KaZaa sucks for me, will ya?

    18. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK

      0.0.0.0 is every interface on your machine , if you have 3'ips then 0.0.0.0 will create a request for all of them at once

      127.0.0.1 is just the local loopback adapter not all of them

    19. Re:Gator is evil by bedessen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do people cling to this retarded 'hosts' method of blocking things? It's the fucking stone age. It leaves a stupid broken image icon for every "blocked" picture. It fails even more ungracefully if you actually HAVE a web server on localhost. It has absolutely horrible granularity -- either you block everything (ad images, non-ad images, legitimate HTML, stylesheets, ...) or nothing from a particular host.

      Try something like privoxy, which will replace those images with a 1x1 transparent image, so that there's no disruption in the page layout. And it will be a HELL of a lot more effective at blocking ads and annoyances than playing whackamole with a stupid list of static hostnames in some file. Can you say "regular expressions"?

    20. Re:Gator is evil by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Yep, that was my immediate thought when I read this. I routinely add the domains spreading malware to my companies name servers, as well as my friends, family and my own. Claria will be going in tomorrow! Nice to get the heads up ;-)

    21. Re:Gator is evil by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > You just got modded "Informative" for not getting the joke.

      He got the joke, dick, he was just pointing out a misspelling, which was certainly not part of the joke.

    22. Re:Gator is evil by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      It's not Ad-Ware it's Ad-Aware, Ad-ware is what you have on your computer that Ad-Aware get's rid of.

    23. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://adblock.mozdev.org

      I think the selective blocking of Flash objects is what won me over. Plus, it is integrated into the browser rather than being an external app with a proxy to run through and all that garbage.

    24. Re:Gator is evil by anakin357 · · Score: 1

      I was recently told by management I could not tell people what a "cookie" is, so I know how that feels.

      I *will* tell people that it is spyware riddled garbage, just because you asked...

      In all truth however, your customers should be more afraid of getting sued themselves.

      --
      http://www.fsckin.com/
    25. Re:Gator is evil by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

      this is true, i think people get a rush because THEY GET TO USE THE HOSTS FILE!! OMG ISNT THAT ON LINUX TOO!

      yeah, get proximitron, it rocks the boat.

      --
      this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    26. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh...you must've missed it too...

      the original joke was suggesting that the anti-adware companies would change their names to sound like spyware (the reverse to gator changing it's name to sound like it isn't). as such, the names were both spelled correctly.

      your sense of humor seems only equalled by your sense of decorum. next time, try understanding someone's humor first before trying to second guess it...because chances are that 99% of the people on /. are smarter than you are.

    27. Re:Gator is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using provoxy myself and it introduces other problems. The regular expressions lead to false positives and break a lot of innocuous things. There are other issues such as page load delay. All the work put into browsers' progressive rendering capabilities is wasted.

  2. The real question is: by bl1st3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long will it be before they start suing people for calling Claria spyware? Its inevitable. Thats what the software does. Noone wants to be advertised at, especially without their knowledge on their own computer.

    We put up with commercials in TV because a TV is relatively cheap. But when most users pay 2000+$ for their computer, and then have programs installed without their knowledge with other programs, then of course the terms will be created.

    Claria == Spyware (now im the first to say it)

    --
    hrrm.
    1. Re:The real question is: by Davak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quote from their page...

      Claria Offers Multiple GAIN Network Ad Vehicles To Meet Your Campaign Objectives:

      Instant Message Sliders
      Instant Message Pop Ups
      Pop Unders
      Tag-A-Long Sliders
      Flash and Rich Media


      Okay, they attack using instant messaging, sliders, and pop under windows.

      Spyware or not--this guys are using advertising methods that they are evil.

    2. Re:The real question is: by Illbay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We put up with commercials in TV because a TV is relatively cheap. But when most users pay 2000+$ for their computer,...

      Okay, so by your theory, if I buy a new plasma flat-panel at $2,500 or so, I will suddenly become outraged the next time I see a floor wax commercial?

      Conversely, if I buy an eMachine at $400, I'm pretty mellow with Gator on my box?

      Hello?

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    3. Re:The real question is: by EricV314a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I put up with commercials on TV because thats what pays for TV content.
      Gator is more like telemarketing than tv commercials. If I am paying for internet access they have no legal right to hijack my internet connection just to bombard me with ads. I pay for my phone not telemarketers.
      We must make it clear to gators err.. clarias clients that we will never by a product or service from thaem just because they advertised to through thoe means. Only then will companies like this die a slow and torturous death

    4. Re:The real question is: by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I believe the reference was to the difference between paying $20+ monthly for internet vs "Free" Television Programming in the US. Obviously "Pay" Tv has commercials, but "Premium Pay"(HBO, Cinemax, SHo, etc) doesn't. If HBO started having commercial advertising on top of the $5-10 a month it costs to bring into your house... there would be rather alot of grousing.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    5. Re:The real question is: by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Gator is more like telemarketing than tv commercials. If I am paying for internet access they have no legal right to hijack my internet connection just to bombard me with ads.


      Gator is basically just malware like any other virus or trojan. Just because a company produces it and claims it has a valid purpose doesn't make it any less evil. The CDC started claiming BackOrifice2k was a remote administration tool, but that didn't make it any less frustrating to find someone had compromised your system and installed it on there without your knowledge to take control of your machine.

      Everyone whose computer I have ever found Gator (and tons of other spyware) on has had no idea what it does or how they installed it. They click on some link (these are teenagers for example.. they're click happy) and suddenly they have a wonderful new time syncing app or a datebook! Great right? Well, until their computer eventually slows to a halt and starts crashing, personal information is spewed out across the Internet without their consent, and/or their computer is used as some kind of distributed cracking node without their knowledge. McAfee, Symantec and others need to be forced to accept that malware like Gator IS a virus and needs to be cleaned from a system. We shouldn't have to use yet another malware cleaner like Adaware to get rid of it. If Gator and other spyware made it VERY clear they were installed and cooperated 100% with the add/remove programs in Win2k to completely remove themselves and ALL their components when you remove them then I wouldn't have such a huge issue with shareware software installing it. It's an annoyance at that point, but easily remedied like having an AOL icon created on your desktop.

    6. Re:The real question is: by bunhed · · Score: 2, Insightful
      TV is relatively cheap

      I was thinking the other day that I spend $40/mo to watch 20+- minutes of advertising/hour. My TV/surround setup is probably worth about $2000. Something is wrong with the whole picture.

    7. Re:The real question is: by Illbay · · Score: 1
      First, he said "a TV" is really cheap, not "TV service" is really cheap.

      And I have no "premium pay" channels on my DISH Network subscription--yet I still pay about $40 a month. And I see PLENTY of commercials!

      This is just a really, really bad analogy. Best to drop it.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    8. Re:The real question is: by Illbay · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you're right on. The TV analogy is lame. TV is entertainment. While my computer CAN entertain me--if I have time for it--mostly I use it to get work done, just like my telephone.

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    9. Re:The real question is: by jrumney · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Ad banners on websites that are placed there by the website owner are like TV advertising. In both cases, the advertising revenue is paying for content which you would otherwise have to pay for (or pay more for). Gator is something else entirely. There is no up side to Gator advertising. You don't get any free content in return. All the ad revenue goes straight into Gator/Claria's pocket.

      Maybe they are right about it not being spyware (who knows what information it is sending back, but maybe it is none), but it is certainly SPAMware.

    10. Re:The real question is: by c77m · · Score: 1
      Pop Unders

      I wonder if the Vanderhook brothers could get a judgement against Claria like they did against X10?

    11. Re:The real question is: by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      We put up with commercials in TV because a TV is relatively cheap. But when most users pay 2000+$ for their computer, and then have programs installed without their knowledge with other programs, then of course the terms will be created.


      Your analogy DOESN'T WORK. TV != Ineternet or a computer. The mediums are different. The intentions are different. Hell, their initial uses were different too.. academia vs entertainment.
      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    12. Re:The real question is: by hamster+foo · · Score: 0

      Um, HBO DOES have commercials. They're all commercials for HBO shows, but they still qualify as commercials.

      --
      - b
    13. Re:The real question is: by stanmann · · Score: 1

      15 minutes of commercials is not annoying unless it interupts the program flow...

      I watched angel last night on TV for the first time in almost 3 years... vs watching a commercial stripped version... I have no idea what the show was about because of the Commercials...

      OTOH playing 10 minutes of coming attractions before the sopranos comes on is something that can easily be ignored...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    14. Re:The real question is: by hdw · · Score: 1

      Well Gator/Claria can be compared with TV commercials.

      TV programs are either payed directly by the customers suscribing to the channel (or pay per view) or indirectly by showing commercials.

      Just as some software are payed directly by the user or indirectly by showing commercial (pop-ups, banners et al).
      And just as the TV networks handle the commercials and pay out money to whoever produced the TV program, there's companies handling computer commercials handing out money to whoever produced the computer software.

      So far it's not a problem, I can chose to install 'AD-ware' programs because I don't want to pay for it. Just as I can chose to watch movies on channel 3, with annoying ads every 20 minutes, because I don't wanna pay for a movie channel without ads.

      The real problem with Gator/Claria (and many others) is that they show ads all the time, not just when I use the software that they're supposed to pay for.
      And worse, the software that's payed for by the ads don't really tell me what I'm installing.
      Instead they say "with this software you get this wonderful extra tool/helper for free" and not "you've chosen to install the 'adware' version of this software, this means that we will install a piece of software that (when it works correctly) will monitor your surfing habits and pop up commercials tailored after your habits."

      What the 'extra' software really do is usually tucked deep in some 40 page fine print EULA, if mentioned at all.
      Ok, there are exceptions, where they actually tell you, but they're _very_ rare.

      If Gator/Claria stated what they're up to when the software installed it wouldn't be spyware.

      But they don't, so it is, now sue me.

      --
      Executive Pope (small) Kallisti Engineering
    15. Re:The real question is: by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      I put up with commercials on TV because thats what pays for TV content.

      remember those days when you had no ads on cable because, as opposed to air TV, you actually paid a monthly fee for the service?

      Now not only you pay, but you STILL have to put up with ads, AND (as if that wasn't enough) channels like HBO want to charge a 'plus' because they're 'premium' channels

      fuck'em, i say.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    16. Re:The real question is: by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Maybe they are right about it not being spyware (who knows what information it is sending back, but maybe it is none)

      If it isn't sending information back (has anyone looked at it in Ethereal?) then the program itself must have a list of advertising subjects to tailor ads based on which webpages the user is browsing.

      Either way, Gator/Claria leaves open the possibility of them tracking what websites (or at least what types of websites) you visit. Either by getting a list of the sites themselves or keeping track of what kinds of ads the Gator software requests. This is probably a great deal of paranoia on my part but it is theorically possible, and do we trust them to have the best of intentions?

      With that in mind I would maintain that it still deserves to be called spyware -- cease and desist orders notwithstanding. But that's just my two cents. In any event I think we'd all agree that it's a worthless POS that deserves to die a hideous death.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    17. Re:The real question is: by hamster+foo · · Score: 1

      Granted. I actually like most of the HBO commercials. I was simply pointing out that they still have commercials.

      --
      - b
    18. Re:The real question is: by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      I have an emachine, you insensitive clod! They actually aren't that bad for just browsing. Unfortunatelyt, I managed tobuy it before I knew anything about computers(hence my high uid) and it looked good on paper... How the hell do they get a Celeron to run at 1.8, anyways? They can't be overclocking it that much, it runs fairly cool

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    19. Re:The real question is: by Eccles · · Score: 1

      How the hell do they get a Celeron to run at 1.8, anyways?

      The 1.8 Ghz Celeron is an Intel spec product, not an eMachine special. It actually uses a P4 core, so has a longer floating point pipeline and does somewhat less per cycle than the lower clock-rate Celerons. It has less cache than regular P4s, so it is slower than a P4/1.8.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    20. Re:The real question is: by mwood · · Score: 1

      "They click on some link (these are teenagers for example.. they're click happy) and suddenly they have a wonderful new time syncing app or a datebook!"

      Ha, that's one reason I popped for XP *Professional* for the family computer. Only the administrator account can install software. Definitely worth the extra $100, if you must run MS Windows at all.

    21. Re:The real question is: by mwood · · Score: 1

      "I was thinking the other day that I spend $40/mo to watch 20+- minutes of advertising/hour. My TV/surround setup is probably worth about $2000. Something is wrong with the whole picture."

      Something certainly is. I paid less than $250 for a very nice 27" TV from a respected manufacturer, and a bunch of networks send me programming through the air for free. You got a raw deal indeed.

    22. Re:The real question is: by bunhed · · Score: 1

      Not a lot of TV signals floating around in the air out here, unfortunately. However, you are right, I did get stupid with the TV :_/

    23. Re:The real question is: by nolife · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered about the self placement commercials. Is this a real benefit? You are already paying for the premium service. I guess if you were considering dropping the service, a commercial may swing you the other way but I figured the annoyance of the commercials would cause a net loss of customers. The Disney Channel does the same thing. For broadcast stations it makes sense but for pay stations, it seems questionable.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    24. Re:The real question is: by stanmann · · Score: 1

      They are somewhat archaic, but the purpose is "coming events" If you don't have a TV guide, then you may not know what is coming on next... OR, without the previews, you might assume(if you haven't heard of it before) that the sopranos is a show about music and write it off as boring.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    25. Re:The real question is: by hamster+foo · · Score: 1

      I can kind of see it for HBO in that it's a promotion of upcoming/current programs generally. I've never quite understood why Time Warner Cable will advertise on their cable service. I'm pretty sure the payment I send to them each month will keep me from forgetting them, and I don't see how flashing their name up on the screen could really disuade people from leaving them. I'm sure there's some benefit to it that I'm totally missing though.

      --
      - b
    26. Re:The real question is: by EricV314a · · Score: 1

      No. Gator cannot be compared to tv commercials. If I am for instance watching Monday Night football, I expect to see ads for Bud Light, Dodge, and Applebees.
      When I am reading Slastdot I DON'T expect to see ads for Karas Adult Playground or whatever company would be stupid enough to buy advertising from gator. If you were watching a pay per view movie or a dvd and ads kept popping up in front of that, then you may compare gator to tv ads.

    27. Re:The real question is: by TaoJones · · Score: 1

      The CDC started claiming BackOrifice2k was a remote administration tool

      Uhm, especially considering the cost (nothing) BO2K actually a nice tool. The fact that it can be used by idiots to attack systems run by idiots is my problem?

      but that didn't make it any less frustrating to find someone had compromised your system and installed it

      If it's "your" system, isn't it your fault they compromised it?

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
  3. Translation by Davak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We feel that the Claria Corporation name will allow us to better communicate the expanding breadth of offerings that we provide to consumers and advertisers."

    Translation: "We feel that changing your name will allow us to continue our evil actions under a different alias... and continue to profit."

    1. Re:Translation by Davak · · Score: 0

      Doh!

      Correction: "We feel that changing our name..."

    2. Re:Translation by KDan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or better:

      "We feel that the numerous clueless users whose cluelessness we take advantage of have started to become aware that 'Gator' is something they don't want on their machines so we are changing our name to confuse them and keep ahead of them."

      Next names lined up: Cuddly-Web, Patriot, Love, Upgrade, MS Windows Update, iloveyou.exe. Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    3. Re:Translation by KDan · · Score: 0, Funny

      Ok, "Daniel" was meant to be on the next line. I'm sure they wouldn't go as far as to take on such a cool name.

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    4. Re:Translation by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      "We feel that changing our name will let our spyware program be installed undetected by annoying ad removal tools in users' computers, and create confusion in the bunch of users who learned to recognize and avoid Gator".

    5. Re:Translation by swordboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, many ISPs had blocked off stuff from Gator's networks so they needed a new non-gator DNS from which to generate pop-ups.

      I build PCs for friends and family occasionally and now I will need to update the HOSTS file on all of them or this shit will get reinstalled.

      I can't believe that open-source isn't addressing this issue and that we will have to wait for Microsoft to come up with a *real* solution (shudder). Is this the only use for trusted computing?

      Seriously, there are some freeware programs out there but they are much too complex for users who don't know whether to click YES or NO when prompted with blatant spyware. If someone could just come up with a simple auto-loading, auto-updating piece of software that simply made these decisions for the user, we wouldn't be here today.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    6. Re:Translation by EricV314a · · Score: 2, Funny

      must remember... Daniel = evil.
      Welcome to the lions den.

      Yours Truly
      King Darius's former advisors

    7. Re:Translation by blowdart · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly
      litigous
      and
      rotten
      internet
      avertisers

    8. Re:Translation by Fernando+Scandolo · · Score: 0

      You omitted the ??? step. If it was that simple, then everybody would be a millionaire :p

    9. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't believe that open-source isn't addressing this issue and that we will have to wait for Microsoft to come up with a *real* solution (shudder). Is this the only use for trusted computing?

      Open source developers have addressed this and other annoying issues.

      If you don't want to use the solution offered, become that developer that offers the one you're looking for or support the ones who you think can deliver it.

    10. Re:Translation by Channard · · Score: 1
      Translation: "We feel that changing your name will allow us to continue our evil actions under a different alias... and continue to profit."

      Correction: "We feel that changing our name..."

      What correction? You haven't seen the new Claria 1.0, with the built in deed-poll feature, have you?. Thanks to Kazaa's spyware component, I'm now legally known as Mr Sparkle's Floor Wax.

    11. Re:Translation by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Taken right out of the playbook of Phillip Morris, err... Altria!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    12. Re:Translation by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing. Like adding the 'altr' from altr-uistic or whatever makes them good. Adding anthing relating to clarity doesn't make gator better. It just means they'll find more victims^W clients.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    13. Re:Translation by meliadus · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like when the UK's notorious nuclear reprocessing plant changed its name from Windscale to Sellafield: Same pollution, different name!

      --
      "Self-denial is indulgence of a propensity to forego." - Ambrose Bierce
    14. Re:Translation by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't believe that open-source isn't addressing this issue

      It has. I run Linux quite happily, and have never run into the slightest set of problems with things like Gator. There just isn't any spyware. (There is, incidently, a piece of software called "chkrootkit", which is about the only thing currently needed. Well, unless you count "spamassassin", though I'm not sure you were thinking of spam originally. Those two pieces of software nicely pick up the vaguely unpleasant things that people might send my way.).

      It hasn't been addressed on Windows because most OSS authors don't *like* Windows.

    15. Re:Translation by yerricde · · Score: 1

      I just call the company "Kraft".

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    16. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Apple's applications software company once known as "Claris"? These guys wouldn' be trying to hitch a free ride on the reputation of Claris, by just changing a single letter, now, would they?

    17. Re:Translation by valmont · · Score: 1

      actually EarthLink's spyware blocker does a pretty damn good job at blocking adware. it's powered by WebRoot. but of course, you gotta be an active earthlink member to use it ... i'm a member but i'm on macos x so i don't use it much. i have played with it under VirtualPC along with the rest of their Total Access 2004 suite just for kicks and to know if i could recommend the whole thing to my windows-using sisters. i can honnestly say i was impressed and i *want* them to use it so they fscking stop calling me for support. I think EarthLink is the first ISP out there to have put out a very decent non-intrusive internet software package for windows users: the bulk of the software manifests itself as a minizable, repositionable, closable "toolbar" and an icon in the tray. It clearly is a departure from their older "all-inclusive-sandbox" approach of the "earthlink 5.0" days.

  4. Gator by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    Oh, thats really going to help these assholes.

    Spyware is spyware, by any other name.

    1. Re:Gator by agentZ · · Score: 1

      Now now. Smoke some of these Altria cigarettes and you'll feel much better!

  5. A gator's got teeth by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Funny

    It likes to bite. You go down to the watering hole and it jumps up and grabs you by the neck and forces you to install it.

    Claria is a social disease. You get it by going to websites that specialize in doing dirty things. Those who get it are usually unaware that they have it, and they are no doubt not using virus protection.

    1. Re:A gator's got teeth by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would stick their thumb up Jeff McFadden's arse...

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    2. Re:A gator's got teeth by Epistax · · Score: 1

      We can call it iClap, as in..

      "Dude, I went to this awesome website... ah man it was great it had so many pictures but.. uhh... I got the iclap..."

    3. Re:A gator's got teeth by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      "Dude, I went to this awesome website... ah man it was great it had so many pictures but.. uhh... I got the iclap..."

      How about a t-shirt? Ya know, with a Gator on it and something like: "I installed Kazaa and all I got was this lousy spyware t-shirt."

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:A gator's got teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too Damn Funny....and I want a T-Shirt. Hmm...actually, now that I think about it, my room-mate's dad works in a print shop...I just might start taking orders ;-)

    5. Re:A gator's got teeth by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Hmmm...Gator...Thumbs up rectums...

      Crikey! This sounds like a job for the Crocodile Hunter! Everything's a beaut' to him and he has no problem using "digital" means to determine wild animals' genders.

      Let's ring 'im!

      GTRacer
      - No need to check here

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  6. claria.com by JamesP · · Score: 1

    Is the new address of "online behaviral marketing" specialists.

    gator.com is not working.

    Well, Claria, go to hell, it's still the same crap.

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:claria.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is the new address of "online behaviral marketing" specialists.

      >gator.com is not working.

      Like your spelling.

  7. Minor correction... by DjMd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The CEO said "We feel that the Claria Corporation name will allow us to better communicate the expanding breadth of offerings that we provide to consumers and advertisers"...
    Instead of communicate he ment to say obfuscate. Its an understandable mistake...

    Crap by and another name still sticks to the bottom of your shoe and smells bad...


    --
    DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
    1. Re:Minor correction... by Davak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wanna see what evil will be appearing on your network soon? Source: Claria

      Date-Manager
      Gator E-Wallet
      Weatherscope
      www.precision-time
      gainpublishing
      Searchscout

      I know I've seen several of these installed already on our systems at work.

      Once spyware, always spyware.

    2. Re:Minor correction... by Professor+Bluebird · · Score: 1

      I'll add these to my hosts file and point them to 0.0.0.0, and when I go to work, they'll go in the DNS server there as 0.0.0.0 .

    3. Re:Minor correction... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      I wonder if I can get them to back down from using the name??

      http://www.claryia.com/

      It's a hosting company my friend and I were going to start, but never got off the ground.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    4. Re:Minor correction... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Clarica will sue them for stinking up the neighbourhood?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Standard procedure by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Excellent trick, tried by Monsanto when they were grilled for producing genetically hacked foods, favoured by nuclear power stations when they have bad leaks, and above all by tin-pot dictators who think that calling their ruined country by a new name will attract a new generation of foreign investors.

    Crap is crap by any name. This kind of maneouver just confirms that they feel they have something to hide.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Standard procedure by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Union Carbide and the singer formerly known as Prince.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Standard procedure by cyberformer · · Score: 1

      It only works for a while. People soon start to hate the new name as much they hate the old one. Think of Verizon, Cingular, Qwest, all of which were once new names thought up at great expense.

      The one semi-successful one so far is "Altria" (Philip Morris), but that's only because it doesn't really use the new name for much. It's just a way for the parent company to distance itself from the tobacco business. Claria could be something similar: a way for the company to present itself to investors or customers while still conducting its spyware activities as Gator. The business plan is something like this:

      1. Salesman from Claria approaches Megacorp offering dirt-cheap online advertising.

      2. Megacorp buys advertising, believing that Claria is like DoubleClick or Google adwords, not the hated Gator.

      3. Ads for Megacorp pop up in Gator, earning it boycotts, class-action lawsuits and general ill-will among potential customers.

      4. Gator/Claria is sued into oblivion. But by then, it's had an IPO (people are more likely to buy stock in Claria than Gator) so the management and VCs are already rich and don't care.

    3. Re:Standard procedure by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      FWIW Qwest was the original name of a long distance company - one of these "1. Lay fiber. 2. ????. 3. Profit!" types, I remember them being featured in Wired. They bought (thanks to the telecommunications stock-market boom - think AOL taking over TW) a number of older companies. It wasn't a case of name changing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  9. I've got something for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Claria is evil spyware.

    If ever there was something that made me want to hire a lawyer it would be these gator scum... I don't know whether it was them or another spyware - but it disabled mozilla on my machine so I had to use IE until I ran a spyware sweep and then mozilla worked fine.

    Forcing people to use buggy software. What they are doing is illegal hacking, they should be prosecuted.

  10. Re:"moniker" by Coderstop · · Score: 0

    It's a word.

    moniker

  11. Claria is spyware!!! by night_flyer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hope slashdot doesn't get forced to remove this now...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:Claria is spyware!!! by frozenray · · Score: 1


      Calling Gator/Claria "Spyware" is inappropriate and derogatory in my opinion. In view of this fine company's outstanding efforts to expand the breadth of offerings that they provide to consumers and advertisers (they practically bend over to do it), their exemplary support of the legal community and the general openness of their offerings to hitherto unknown forms of espionage, I suggest we refer to Gator/Claria as Goatseware in the future.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    2. Re:Claria is spyware!!! by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      More importantly, I hope they don't have to remove this now...

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    3. Re:Claria is spyware!!! by joe_bruin · · Score: 1

      you will notice that the slashdot "editors" now refrain from calling gator/claria spyware. say it with me now:

      gator is spyware!
      GAIM is spyware!!
      claria is spyware!!!

  12. Changing Names by CGP314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Makes me think of how Philip Morris changed its name to Altria (Sounds like they are now altruistic) or how Palladium was changed to Next Generations Secure Computing Platform Whatever. (Sounds like they are trying to make your computer safe)

    They don't change the business, they just try to run from their (well deserved) reputation.

    1. Re:Changing Names by sckienle · · Score: 1

      Name changing is a constant game. The Boards need something to do when they aren't merging/acquiring or changing the reporting structure of the company. They have to earn their somewhat inflated pay.

      My favorite stupid name change is the one proposed by the board of PWC Consulting prior to being bought out by IBM: Monday. I think IBM bought them out just to keep their employees from dying of embarrassment!

      --
      I don't see things in black and white; I see the gray. Heck, I actually see in color, which makes things more difficult
    2. Re:Changing Names by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      The Pasadena Plastics Complex became Houston Chemical Complex after a huge explosion in that small town.

      Same old story, and the sad thing is it works. Just when I finally have the family computer users able to remember that Gator is bad, I have to work on another name for them.

      I'm going to thinkgeek.com and getting one of those No I will not fix your computer t-shirts.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    3. Re:Changing Names by Danse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the funny thing is, everyone still refers to them by their old name anyway. When you read about Altria, they always say something like "formerly known as Phillip Morris" or something along those lines. So now we'll see "Claria, formerly known as Gator"...

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    4. Re:Changing Names by jradice · · Score: 1

      Changing a company name can really work well in the long-term for the business. Sure, right now we all realise that Altria is Phillip Morris and the Claria is really Gator. But, in a few years will we remember that these companies once had *bad* reputations?

      I think a sterling example of a successful name chane is the airline AirTran. Sounds like a nice, successful, safe airline, right? Ah, but we forget that AirTran was formerly known as ValuJet. You'd never be caught dead flying ValuJet after its tragedy in Florida. But, sure, you'll fly AirTran because you haven't heard anything bad about it!

      So, just wait a few years until *Claria* somehow gets some good PR. Most will forget about its Gator past and assume its a new reputable company.

    5. Re:Changing Names by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the USA PATRIOT Act as another example of subversive naming tactics.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    6. Re:Changing Names by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      I read this and all I could think of is "the artist formerly known as Prince"... :)

    7. Re:Changing Names by cyberformer · · Score: 1

      NGSCB sounds deliberately obsure, but Microsoft has been pronouning it something like "Ingsoc". If you read 1984 (Warning: huge text file), it all makes sense.

    8. Re:Changing Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me think of how Philip Morris changed its name to Altria (Sounds like they are now altruistic) or how Palladium was changed to Next Generations Secure Computing Platform Whatever. (Sounds like they are trying to make your computer safe)

      Nothing like coming on Slashdot to get those unbiased views of Microsoft... Nothing wrong seeing them mentioned in the same sentence as Philip Morris, good friends of the health industry! .........

    9. Re:Changing Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me think of how Philip Morris changed its name to Altria (Sounds like they are now altruistic) or how Palladium was changed to Next Generations Secure Computing Platform Whatever. (Sounds like they are trying to make your computer safe)

      Nothing like coming on Slashdot to get those unbiased views of Microsoft... Nothing wrong seeing them mentioned in the same sentence as Philip Morris, good friends of the health industry!


      Well Microsoft was found guilty of changing the name of one of their products. That is illegal where I come from! Once you come up with the name for a product, you CANNOT change it! Now changing the name of your company is A-OK!

  13. Google by Pingular · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, searching for Gator brings up www.Gator.com, which takes you to www.Claria.com, but search for Claira brings up websites about Claria headsets, I wonder how they're going to get round this.

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Google by Decaffeinated+Jedi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Strangely enough, searching for Gator brings up www.Gator.com, which takes you to www.Claria.com, but search for Claira brings up websites about Claria headsets, I wonder how they're going to get round this.
      Just keep linking to their site like that, pal, and Google's PageRank will eventually take care of the rest.
      --
      DecafJedi
      my weblog: apropos of something
  14. Never name your company the same as your product by Brento · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He fails to mention what "Claria" is supposed to mean or how it accomplishes this goal

    It just illustrates why you don't name your company after a single product line. If that product turns out to have bad side effects (like cancer or flipping SUV's over) then you need to change the company name so prospective investors and customers don't think it's the only thing you do.

    Did you know Bridgestone is the parent company of Firestone? Of course you didn't. And while you would probably think twice about buying a Firestone tire for your SUV (even though it was only one model of tire involved out of Firestone's entire lineup), you wouldn't think twice about putting on a Bridgestone tire.

    Likewise, if Gator wanted to come out with a second product tomorrow, they couldn't - because who would install Gator Calculator or whatever? Nobody. But who would install Claria Calculator? The same millions of users who installed Gator.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  15. A rose by jstrain · · Score: 1, Funny

    by any other name would smell as...oh, wait. This is Gator.

  16. So when does America change its name? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (n/t)

    1. Re:So when does America change its name? by KDan · · Score: 4, Funny

      New Bush initiative:

      "Make no mistake, it is without any misunderestimation that I have decided that the great country that is America needs a new name. We need a name that will better symbolise the warmth and happiness that we spread throughout the world. After much thinking, we have come up with the name 'Cuddles'. Starting on January 1st, the United States of America shall simply be known as 'Cuddles'."

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    2. Re:So when does America change its name? by Cooper_007 · · Score: 1
      You know he just calls it that so that it's easier to remember...

      Cooper
      --
      Paranoids are simply those with all the facts.
      - Transmetropolitan -

    3. Re:So when does America change its name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you got your crlf's correct this time... or we would have had:

      Starting on January 1st, the USA shall simply be known as Cuddles Daniel. :)

      AC

    4. Re:So when does America change its name? by JPelorat · · Score: 0

      Feh. More like Inciteful.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    5. Re:So when does America change its name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's "Bonerland".

    6. Re:So when does America change its name? by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      Silly. They'd use a marketing firm, which would produce 'Xtreeem Amerika!" Skateboarders on the banknotes and all.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  17. These guys aren't the sharpest tool.... by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 1
    in the tool box. But they are tools.

    So they change the Name of the company and the website, but forgot to rename Gator(R) eWallet ! Yeah, cause I'd trust these folks with any of my financial info.

  18. Claria is the name of my ex-wife by armando_wall · · Score: 5, Funny


    She used to read my mail without my consent.

    1. Re:Claria is the name of my ex-wife by Art_Vandelai · · Score: 0

      That must be an example of prior art - maybe you can invalidate their patent!

  19. Claria? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe "Chlamydia" would be a more appropriate name..

    Hey man, I just installed Chlamydia!
    Can you get rid of it?
    I dunno, I think I gotta go see an expert.

    1. Re:Claria? by oshy · · Score: 1

      Thought "Thrush" would be better for a bunch of irritating c*nts

    2. Re:Claria? by ripcrd · · Score: 1

      It requires shots to get rid of. A shot of Ad-aware or a shot of Spybot Seek and Destroy.

      --
      --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
    3. Re:Claria? by vix86 · · Score: 1

      Maybe "Chlamydia" would be a more appropriate name..

      Oh so I'm not the only one that heard "Chlamydia" when I read "Claria" :)

      That's good to know.

  20. Does this mean their going to replace the gator? by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    Claria sounds like a blobule type of animal; I highly reccomend either a clear yellow blobule, or brown-to-light brown blobule with either a smooth or coarse texture.

  21. In the spirit of Googleism by Ratface · · Score: 5, Funny

    Top hits for "Claria is" on Google...

    Claria is looking for talented web developer with strong design and Java development and skills.

    Claria is a top quality commercial headset at a very reasonable price.

    Claria is supposed to be adorable but..ehm...please, be kind...give her back her bunny doll?

    Claria is a trademark of Claria.

    Claria is generally considered one of the best universities in the world

    Claria is a brown eyed, brown haired, rather voluptuous 27 year old woman of average height.

    Claria is the leading strategic hiring partner for technology start-ups

    claria (TM) is a registered trademark of Claria Headsets

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:In the spirit of Googleism by WegianWarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      claria (TM) is a registered trademark of Claria Headsets



      I smell a courtaction comming up... the 'new' Claria (ex Gator, but still a bunch of evil, stinky bastards) will sue the 'old' Claria (Claria Headsets) for using their IP. ie the name Claria...

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:In the spirit of Googleism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this time, even though they're in different industries, they might have a case... since Gator will be SEIOUSLY dirtying the name.

    3. Re:In the spirit of Googleism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be pedantic but, wouln't that be Claria(r) is a registerd trademark... if it's just (tm) then it's just a trademark, and not a registerd one.... *mumbles off into distance*

    4. Re:In the spirit of Googleism by PhukLunix · · Score: 0

      Claria is a brown eyed, brown haired, rather voluptuous 27 year old woman of average height. Post rest of pics plz. Or a Torrent.

    5. Re:In the spirit of Googleism by Zigg · · Score: 1

      This picture? From the source page... not what you expected I bet.

    6. Re:In the spirit of Googleism by jafuser · · Score: 1

      And this time, even though they're in different industries, they might have a case... since Gator will be SEIOUSLY dirtying the name.

      I was about to post that very same thought.

      I recognize that in law, a trademark name can be shared if two companies offer distinctly different products; but what of the situation where a very unscrupulous company chooses to move in (even though their product is distinctively different)?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  22. Tyres by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget, though, that there really wasn't anything wrong with the Firestone tyres. Ford stupidly told customers to run at absurdly low pressures to improve the stability of a badly-designed vehicle, and since the tyres were being used out of spec, they failed. Everyone knows blowouts are caused by running on soft tyres (or they should).

    I run Firestone tyres on one of my Citroens, because they are the closest to the proper Michelin X tyres (which aren't made in 145SR15 any more). Never had a problem with them.

    1. Re:Tyres by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Michelin X tyres (which aren't made in 145SR15 any more)

      Don't Citroens have metric rims, which is why you need Michelin tyres on them?

    2. Re:Tyres by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Nope. The only European cars with metric wheel rims are some BMWs (535TD springs to mind) and some Mercs. They're a bitch to find. Fortunately there are Imperial-size tyres that are "close enough" (but I wouldn't risk it), or you can get aftermarket wheels.

    3. Re:Tyres by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, though, that there really wasn't anything wrong with the Firestone tyres. Ford stupidly told customers to run at absurdly low pressures to improve the stability of a badly-designed vehicle, and since the tyres were being used out of spec, they failed. Everyone knows blowouts are caused by running on soft tyres (or they should).

      That's not quite true. Ford had them run at low tire pressures to smooth out the ride and it was when the owners let it slip lower that the problems occurred. Ford just removed the margin of error.

    4. Re:Tyres by Elbow+Macaroni · · Score: 1
      I had 4 of those wonderful tires. I find it impossible to believe that the tire pressure would make them fall apart like they did. As I would drive around for about 4 months, one after the other of these so called tires would become a shredded heap of rubber and steel.

      Good thing I didn't do any highway driving at the time or I might be dead like some of the other people.

      You work for Bridgestone right?

      --
      -------------------------------------
      Technically, we are beyond survival.
    5. Re:Tyres by DrDoombender · · Score: 1

      Off topic easy:
      Actually, yeah. Look it up, any tire that is under or over inflated will have major problems. Most tire manufacturers recommend 30-40psi for tires. Mine have a spec of 35 psi, and not only do you notice it in your fuel economy if they go down to oh say, 20-25psi but you are also putting added pressure on the tires in the form of friction and weight. Which is why the real bad guy is Ford and not Firestone. But most people assume that because the tires went bad, that firestone was making bad tires. But you'll find that in many cooler states like Oregon, the problems didn't persist. In the case of states where its warmer, you had problems. This has to do with friction, and increased heat within the tire. As I was unaware at the time, as your tire moves, it creates friction which actually heats up the tire as it moves. Heat(from friction) + Heat from road & environment + lower psi = lots of trouble for stupid gas guzzling SUVs.

      but in either case, its all about common sense. I mean how many 18 wheelers do you see carrying a hundred tons of payload with tires that are under inflated? Most of the time, you have 18 wheels at a high tire pressure to ensure that the weight is evenlly distributed across all the tires to prevent premature wear on the tires, less fuel consumption....etc.

    6. Re:Tyres by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Nope, I've just worked with cars and lorries for a long time. If you run a tyre soft, it will overheat and collapse very, very quickly. Any make of tyre.

    7. Re:Tyres by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Most tyres (yes, I know how to spell too :) are made by one of three companies: Firestone, Goodyear, or Goodrich. The tyres under their own labels are their low-end products.

      However, those sold under other names are built to different specs. That's why when Atlas tyres (Standard Oil's product line) were absolutely top of the line quality, while Firestone-labeled tyres were barrel-scrapings. Atlas tyres were made, by Firestone (IIRC), to Standard Oil's specs.

      Road service techs have told me that they often make bets on the culprit before going out to fix a roadside flat -- and the top three bets are on Firestone, Goodyear, and Goodrich, because of the above, with Firestone being the worst. (In my observation, they wear more poorly than average, even if outright fails are limited to occasional bad runs.) Also, the tyres put on new vehicles are the absolute bottom end quality (to save the car dealer money), which is why many people immediately replace them when they get a new vehicle.

      BTW, that some big name manufacturer made the product to another company's specs is true of a great many products in all fields. Frex, that private label dog food you just paid a fortune for was probably made by Purina or Doane's (in America), or ConAgra (in Europe). It's more cost-effective to contract to an existing manufacturer (who also has a distribution network in place) than to build your own plant and buy your own trucks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. why not name it... by jlemmerer · · Score: 1, Funny

    WindowsAE (Advertisement Edition). The basic functionality of phoning home is already implemented in the OS, and the ads will be a "feature" that you can charge

    --
    ".Sig Stealer" was here
  24. They still have some working pages by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 1
    The main page is just redirecting you to claria, how ever.....

    This one works... !

    so does this... !

    No redirect here!

    same for this!

    From any of those links above you should be able to browse through the old site.

  25. Re:"moniker" by Burb · · Score: 1

    moniker = (Slightly obscure) British English expression meaning "name"

    --

  26. I'm surprised . . . by Momomoto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That Clarica hasn't complained about Gator's new name being so similar to theirs.

    If I were in the life insurance business you'd better believe I wouldn't want my name associated with something so malicious as spyware.

    --
    "Max, come over here. French-Canadian bean soup. I want to pay. Let them leave me alone." - Dutch Schultz
    1. Re:I'm surprised . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing that Clarica is just as - if not moreso - insidious than Gator, I don't see what the difference is.

    2. Re:I'm surprised . . . by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...That Clarica hasn't complained about Gator's new name being so similar to theirs.

      Of course, Clarica's name is the result of a rebranding of their own. Until 1999, they were Mutual Life of Canada.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  27. Oh my by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

    And all this from a company which used to produce decent form autocompletion software?

    How sad. DotCOM goes bust -> companies collapse -> remaining resort to bad measures.

  28. I just mailed claria.co.uk the headphone company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And asked them nicely to investigate any legal avenues they might have in relation to challenging gator. They may or may not react, but I think we should support them if they decide to take action. Certainly this story should be covered, to give them something to distinguish themselves from a potential PR disaster.... so Slashdot articles could send traffic their way. But only if they have the balls to stand up to these spyware bastards... or at least speak out against them.

    I feel it is the least we can do to help some small company which will no doubt have to change it's name because of all this.

    It's sad really. Much is ill in the world.

  29. Great :P Now we have by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Claria-- The spyware formerly known as Gator.

    Oh Drat. Now I am going to get a cease and dissist letter.....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  30. The real problem by t0ny · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As the parent post said, Gator/Claria is essentially forcing unwanted advertising down the throats of computer users.

    Another casualty is performance: these spyware programs arent just tracking your usage and pushing advertising, they are consuming finite computer resources in the form of processing power, networking bandwidth, and memory space.

    I have seen firsthand what all of these programs do to a corporate environment, and it is just as bad (if not worse) than a virus. The difference between a virus and spyware is that the former can kill or corrupt your computer, while the latter weakens and sufficates it.

    Since these computers have no protection against the spyware, this causes many effects- all of which bleed resources from the company.

    1) degraded computer performance: the worker now has to work slower

    2) increased network bandwidth consumtion: this degrades network performance for the entire company, as well as again consuming an ever-growning share of a finite resource (WAN bandwidth)

    3) increased computer support: the time and expense involved in having somebody diagnose and fix the problem effecting the client computer(s)

    Once you start trying impliment a solution, a company is forced to spend thousands of dollars and hundreds of man-hours planning and implimenting a solution to stop all the spyware.

    I would encourage companies to start taking legal action against these spyware companies. What they are doing is every bit as bad and immoral as releasing computer viruses into the wild.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:The real problem by diersing · · Score: 1
      Take advertising out of the equation. Your argument that its unwanted is universal, whether it be TV, billboards, or computer means, its the job of the advertiser to inform us of their products and services. No one WANTS to be bombarded with ads, its usually a means to pay for commercial programming or facilitate something else via *corporate sponsorship*.

      At some point, we need to push responsiblity to the user. I've seen the window when I hit certain sites that asks if I want to install Gator. Why would anyone, anywhere, anytime click YES unless they know and want the product they're being prompted to install?

      In a corporate environment.... why in the hell do your users have the rights to install it in the first place?, tighten that shit up and take away their rights to install. Or hey, get a firewall and block the traffic.... and no, its not going to take thousand of dollars or hundreds of man hours if you know what your doing (especially since you should already have this infrastucture in place anyway). If your firsthand experience is as a sysadmin you should know by now to stop complaing and fix it. The alternative is to pay for more bandwidth to handle all your lusers spyware, weatherbots, lotter trackers, eBay sniping.... come on now.

    2. Re:The real problem by mwood · · Score: 1

      *sigh* These programs can do very little to a corporate environment, because *you control the routers*. See floods of inappropriate traffic with certain address ranges? Sixty seconds of ACL editing makes those ranges disappear from the Internet (so far as your network can tell) and the adware starves.

      If your users are on any recent version of MS Windows, you also control the directory and so the workstations. Add a policy forbidding Win32 to run known ad/spyware executables. Push out a startup script or IPSEC policy that turns off troublesome ports. You have more power than any emperor dared dream of! Use it for good!

      By all means sue, if you find a way. But don't stop there and don't wait for the lawyers.

    3. Re:The real problem by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about all the bugs. Gator has caused so many problems with Internet Explorer that Microsoft dedicated several knowledge base articles to it. Mostly erroneous "cannot find server or dns error" errors, and sometimes crashes.

    4. Re:The real problem by owlstead · · Score: 1

      1) sounds like McAfee
      2) sounds like McAfee (to a certain extend)
      3) defntly McAfee, just had to fix yet another corrupt mailbox file

      And we pay to have this stuff on our computer :)

    5. Re:The real problem by t0ny · · Score: 1
      In a corporate environment.... why in the hell do your users have the rights to install it in the first place?, tighten that shit up and take away their rights to install.

      I know there are ways from ever letting it become an issue, but there are a few things in the way...

      1) I'm not always the person who creates the network. Many (most) times I am working with what was assembled by the people before me.

      2) A great many corporations and government institutions are still using Win9x clients. You cannot practically restrict installation rights on at OS.

      3) Removing installation rights is a very politically charged issue, especially in a mixed or upgraded environment. Also, many times the admin doesnt have the authority to create policy, so you need to have a Manager or CIO who is both willing to take the heat, and technically competant enough to understand the scope of the problem (before it becomes a major issue, at any rate).

      Or hey, get a firewall and block the traffic.... and no, its not going to take thousand of dollars or hundreds of man hours if you know what your doing (especially since you should already have this infrastucture in place anyway). If your firsthand experience is as a sysadmin you should know by now to stop complaing and fix it. The alternative is to pay for more bandwidth to handle all your lusers spyware, weatherbots, lotter trackers, eBay sniping.... come on now.

      4) In many environments, I cannot change the rules on the firewall, this is handled by another person or department. However, there ALWAYS has to be a firewall; Im setting one up next week, and have in the past, so I already know its not a huge undertaking.

      Im not complaining. Im mearly providing more information in order that others can understand the whole situation. You have to admit, a lot of people at slashdot dont really see issues in terms of corporate needs, which they should.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    6. Re:The real problem by t0ny · · Score: 1
      We use the 4.5 version of McAfee; this should be the only one used at all, IMO. Use the latest SuperDAT after installation, it includes the *very necessary* engine upgrade.

      The only problem I have ever had is that, after it is installed, you cannot run scandisk or defrag with McAfee running (on Win9x); it will hang up the computer. To fix this, turn off the services (the VScan *and* the console; a lot of people forget the console).

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    7. Re:The real problem by diersing · · Score: 1
      From the sounds of it, your consulting at some poor locations. I personally have done some work in government offices (state and city) and I've not seen any 9x clients. NT4 yes, but almost all have leveraged MS into 2k or XP.

      In the real world corporate clients I've been to, the only people that even bark (or notice) not having admin rights are developers. For the most part, users just need to run what they need (outlook, word, etc) and if an admin loads it beforhand they don't/won't notice not missing the rights.

      I recently took a small law office from 9x to XP. That was the first time in about 6 years I saw a 9x box in a business. Its just too damn unreliable and unsupported for anyone to do business critical applications in this day and age.

      Admittedly, I usually work at larger companies and this law office was the first that didn't have a domain/directory. I can't believe a sysadmin would tolerate an environment where resources (both local machines and bandwidth) would be wasted. Even in office politics, which I sometimes may not understand, who's going to side with wasting resources?

    8. Re:The real problem by t0ny · · Score: 1
      From the sounds of it, your consulting at some poor locations. I personally have done some work in government offices (state and city) and I've not seen any 9x clients. NT4 yes, but almost all have leveraged MS into 2k or XP.

      Its not for want of spending money; they have a huge contract with Unisys, for which they are getting absolutely nothing. We are talking hundreds of millions of dollars, for which Unisys is providing a helpless desk, a handful of desktop support people, sub-par email services, and WAN support. The WAN guys are good. All told, I could set up a department to provide the same level of support for maybe two million. *Somebody* high up must be getting pretty nice kickbacks.

      In the real world corporate clients I've been to, the only people that even bark (or notice) not having admin rights are developers. For the most part, users just need to run what they need (outlook, word, etc) and if an admin loads it beforhand they don't/won't notice not missing the rights.

      Some people do, but there are too many people who want to waste time with customized screensavers, desktop themes, and other such shit. Needless to say, they are not the productive people.

      There are a few users who I would actually say need it, because they deal with outside companies which have custom applications. In a perfect situation, however, they would need a support person to install it and give the application the appropriate level of rights. This suggestion of mine was shot down, because it raised the bar on the desktop support people's required level of competance (which is pretty low). The only people they had who knew what they were doing were two consultants (who have since been laid off), and the dept manager (who was reorganized to another city department).

      I recently took a small law office from 9x to XP. That was the first time in about 6 years I saw a 9x box in a business. Its just too damn unreliable and unsupported for anyone to do business critical applications in this day and age.

      Nobody wants to spend any money. The problem is that, in this area, most management people have no idea what is going on with IT, nor do they care. Most CIOs have accounting backgrounds, and dont care for computers.

      Admittedly, I usually work at larger companies and this law office was the first that didn't have a domain/directory. I can't believe a sysadmin would tolerate an environment where resources (both local machines and bandwidth) would be wasted.

      Hey, if they dont want to spend the money, what more can I do? I had to pester them for over a year just to get an autoloader for backups. Fortunately, my manager started attaching stuff on to other budgetted projects, so we were finally able to update a lot of equipment. Unfortunately, I was never able to set all of it up before I was laid off (I think they only have one consultant left there, out of about ten or so). I guess that was a big problem, even though I was doing all the LAN/WAN support for the department (not the City), I had no pull because I was a consultant.

      Even in office politics, which I sometimes may not understand, who's going to side with wasting resources?

      You would be surprised.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    9. Re:The real problem by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Wonder if some big datacrunching outfit could sue 'em for theft of CPU cycles??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  31. Gator may be gone but GAIN still lives... by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 1
    Gator may no longer exist, but a quick search on the Claria website reveals that GAIN, the company which actually distributes their loverly applications still exists.

    Now I might be fooled into thinking that Claria wasn't spyware, but I thought that the name GAIN was still attached to it pretty closely. It makes me wonder if they will be rebranding this company too...

    The public can't be that stupid, can they?

    1. Re:Gator may be gone but GAIN still lives... by eresquigal · · Score: 1

      > The public can't be that stupid, can they?

      Given that 99% of the PC's in the world are running Micro$oft OSes, that can only be a rethoric question.

      Right ?

  32. Overflow them! by rabalde · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They install a program on your machine that sends data over your connection about your behavior, right?. So, why don't we give them what they're are asking for? Why don't develop a program to send fake data to the server that gator is connecting to? If the data is credible (=random but correct), they have a mountain of crap data about users ... and voila, their business plan is useless

    1. Re:Overflow them! by caston · · Score: 2, Funny

      You first.

      --
      Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    2. Re:Overflow them! by mwilliamson · · Score: 1
      Someone post the hostnames that gator communicates with...perhaps some TCP dumps too.

      I can't because I run a real OS that doesn't have a provision to allow for "drive-by" downloads.

    3. Re:Overflow them! by X_Bones · · Score: 1

      When Gator sends this credible-looking (but purposely inaccurate) data to their clients, the clients turn around and use it to decide what types of advertisements to put on what web pages. By following your plan, we'll end up seeing ads for products you'd never buy in a million years on web pages with a completely different focus from the product being pushed. If I see an ad for adult diapers or whatever on, say, Gamespot, there's no way I'm gonna click it. But if I happen to see a good deal on RAM or a hard disk or something, I won't be completely pissed off since the product is something I might actually need one day. I'd say it's better to give Gator and friends accurate data and ignore the ads, or give completely bogus data if you really want to make their business plan useless.

      Of course, all this is theoretical in my case; my hosts file is something like eight hundred lines long...

    4. Re:Overflow them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the idea, although, by modifying their script to defeat the purpose they intended it for, we could be subject to violation of the DMCA...

    5. Re:Overflow them! by dekashizl · · Score: 1
      Why don't develop a program to send fake data to the server that gator is connecting to? If the data is credible (=random but correct), they have a mountain of crap data about users ...
      I am definitely in support of this approach. I feel that people and companies that abuse public systems and trust (like Gator and friends, SPAMmers, etc.) are best put down by negating their expected benefits.

      More than a program to fight Gator, I think we need a framework to defend people against this entire class of assault. Gator/Claria/Cuddles/C00lNetToolz/whatever defense could just be a plugin that a user might download.

      SPAM as well can be fought essentially by overwhelming SPAMmers with responses. They want to get people interested in their product, and with the cheapness of email, (I've read) around 1/10000 response rate is profitable. SO give them 50000000/10000 response rate (spam the response addresses) and see how much longer they can operate.

      I have started a project to arm the masses and allow us to take back what should rightfully be ours: our computers, our bandwidth, and our time. The human brain does not defend against invading microorganisms -- lots of individual white blood cells do. Is anybody else working on anything like this?
    6. Re:Overflow them! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You have apparently never seen a system infected with gator and other spyware. I saw a machine several weeks ago that was so incredibly bogged down with gator and ilk that it was literally unuseable - there were so many popups that the user was unable to click on the windows he wsa trying to use, so many popups were occuring. The 2GHz tbird w/ 512M was running at a snail's pace. I don't even want to know how he got so much spyware installed on his system.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    7. Re:Overflow them! by X_Bones · · Score: 1

      And how does this affect any company's bottom line again?

      I'm not debating that Gator and friends are scumware, believe me; I'm just questioning the effectiveness of the OP's plan to flood Gator with bad data.

    8. Re:Overflow them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just questioning the effectiveness of the OP's plan to flood Gator with bad data.

      Bad data results in lower click-thru traffic for advertisers. Lower traffic results in advertisers questioning their methods and demanding more accurated data. If Gat^H^H^HClaria can't deliver, advertisers will find someone who can.

    9. Re:Overflow them! by BillX · · Score: 1

      Trouble with this, is that you'd be sued/PATRIOTed/anti-hacker-lawed to death the nanosecond you were identified as the creator of this program.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    10. Re:Overflow them! by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      Very good idea. In fact, we can make such a program work like Seti where the clients dowload blocks of data to send to 's network and then send back reports of what they have done so it can be tallied up and the sender can be ranked by how much data they sent. That way you can have a competitive atmosphere that should give people an incentive to participate.

      Do have any links that list out the hosts + protocol for different spyware programs? That would be a good tool to get me started on it.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
  33. Just like Palladium by Quizo69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Hmmm, this Palladium of ours seems to be garnering a lot of bad press lately. I know, we'll call it NGSCB so no one will know what it really does!!" - Microsoft stooge.

    "Man, this Total Information Awareness idea of ours seems to be upsetting those pesky privacy advocates. I know, we'll call it Terrorism Information Awareness, then if the privacy advocates cry foul we can call them unpatriotic and lock them up at Guantanamo." - John Poindexter.

    Face it people, when a company/organisation changes the name of something to obfuscate it's true intentions, you know it's a bad thing.

    I say play them at their own game. Just call spyware "Clariaware" from now on.

    Quizo69

    1. Re:Just like Palladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Claria is Spyware, its spyware. Claria is spyware its spyware. Did I mention that Claria is spyware? That's because Claria is spyware, its spyware. SPYWARE

    2. Re:Just like Palladium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Just FYI, Palladium changed its name because there's a firewall product of the same name, the writers of which were understandably upset when websites like www.stoppalladium.com started popping up

    3. Re:Just like Palladium by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      What is this Total Information Awareness you speak of? I know only of Total Information Technology. "and when you're sucking on the TIT, I have you by the motherboard!" (Robin Williams Live on Broadway, as Bill Gates)

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  34. Gelfling by wigam · · Score: 0, Funny

    Looks like Spyware, tastes like Spyware. MUST be spyware.

  35. who cares? by mstamat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gator is crap, so who cares? I wonder what kind of morons use such software. Bonzi Buddy rulez!

  36. How to pronounce? by geekster · · Score: 1

    I feel like a morron trying to say Clair...

    1. Re:How to pronounce? by geekster · · Score: 1

      and a moron who can't spell his own ... definition? Hey, at least it's not my native tounge

  37. add another by real_smiff · · Score: 1

    first into my head was clara.net, a reputable UK (now European) ISP which is probably also now noticing an unfortunate similarity... bummer eh :/ Still I'm not the sort of /. nut who's gonna suggest "similar names shouldn't be allowed", 'cos we all know that's just a slippery slope.. I wonder how strong an association is really formed in peoples' minds by these sorts of name "similarities".. probably little, unless the word is already an adjective in the language. Hmmm, deep! :p There's probably loads and loads of companies with similar names to claria if you start looking (which i'm not gonna do eh).

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  38. Here's an incredibly novel idea... by mu-sly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of renaming themselves in a pathetic attempt to remove their undeniable links with spyware, why not just stop writing spyware, and instead write a piece of software that's actually useful for something.

    That way, people will download their software based on it's own merit, rather than having the new Claria spyware drive-by installed on them in the same fashion that the Gator spyware currently is.

    Changing your name to disassociate yourself from your past activities is something career criminals like to do. In this case it is nothing short of a total admission of guilt.

    1. Re:Here's an incredibly novel idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well strangely it does save passwords. Me and a few coworkers found this out when a user was having problems logging into something. I check out her system and shes got Gator and some Acceleration softare installed. I uninstalled Gator and she tried to get back into a webpage to do some work but she had her password saved in gator for the past 6 months. If you ask me I think its a security risk to the network having this adware saving passwords. We had to report it to security.

    2. Re:Here's an incredibly novel idea... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      The way they are doing it now, they are making money without actually selling any software. If this model works for them why should they write non-ad-ware software that people have to put forth the effort to buy?

      Even if what they are doing isn't ethical, it is legal and it is making them money.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  39. If this works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a mere name change could work wonders, perhaps Micro$oft could change their name to
    FreeOS, or say, $30os, to somehow indicate that they have decided to relent on their high prices, and offer a decently-priced operating system. For instance, the "FreeOS" version comes with XP Professional, with no telephone support.
    The possibilities are endless!

    1. Re:If this works... by princewally · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought XP Pro was already free. Didn't cost me a cent.

      Oh, wait....

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
  40. Just like ValuJet by Mr.+Dop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...Changing to AirTran, will probably work for it in the short term, most people wont remember the change in the long term, and there fore the ruse will work unless they change their practices. And yes the public is that stupid.

  41. Not spyware! by anaphora · · Score: 1, Informative

    Remember guys, Gator is not spyware. It's adware. Please refrain from using the former term.

    1. Re:Not spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as if ads are wholesome.

  42. A Gator By Any Other Name by the_DaRKaNGLe · · Score: 1, Funny

    Still smells as swee.... errrrmmmm no it doesn't.. it smells like something alright thoug...

    --




    A problem cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created it.
  43. I thought they changed it to slimeware.com by Dynamoo · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought Gator had changed their name to Slimeware.com. It certainly looks like a similar sort of outfit. Hmm..

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  44. Claria vs Gator by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that we can call Gator "spyware" again, as long as we're sure to refer to Claria as "adware" instead? Adware, spyware, it's all the same thing. The only difference between it and viruses is that viruses don't hide behind the fine print of a EULA. That, and they don't annoy me quite as bad

  45. Carnivore / Gator by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of Carnivore.

    The FBI simply renamed it to DCS1000. "We had a concern that it wasn't a good name for the system".

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
  46. Another day... by upside · · Score: 1

    ...another DNS entry to route to 127.0.0.1

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  47. Re:Does this mean their going to replace the gator by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    Funny...to me it sounds like an allergy medicine. Claria...clears your head and reports back to us what you've been sniffing.

  48. And in SImilar News Today.... by H8X55 · · Score: 0

    Microsoft CEO Bill Gates announces that the much anticipated 2007 Windows Desktop Release, tentativly called "longhorn" will be renamed "linux".

  49. Re:like Philip Morris is Altria by DynamiteNeon · · Score: 1

    I thought of Phillip Morris also when I read this.

    The sad thing is that most people are probably going to fall for this sort of marketing tactic. Most of these companies only need to trick the people who aren't paying attention.

    I know many non-technical people who were actually starting to recognize Gator since it's the most common, and now they have to start over again.

  50. You can get pills for that.. by Channard · · Score: 0

    Claria is a social disease With a better suited name, too. Cue a thousand 'Do you have clarmydia?' anti-spyware websites springing up.

  51. Not spyware? by bo0ork · · Score: 1
    No, much worse. This is a quote from their privacy statement (my highlighting though):

    What software is on the host computer:

    Information about software installed on the host computer may be accessed and stored on our servers. We may identify the existence or non-existence of certain software titles on the computer (including GAIN-Supported Software), as well as their version numbers, so that we can determine whether to take steps to offer new software that does not currently reside on the computer, to offer upgrades to the software that does currently reside on the computer, or, following the release of new versions of GAIN-Supported Software, to automatically upgrade, at GAIN Publishing's discretion, GAIN-Supported Software that has previously been downloaded onto the computer. We may also utilize this information to determine whether the users' of the computer are in compliance with The GAIN Publishing Privacy Statement and End User License Agreement.

    --
    Does everything include nothing?
  52. It's called rebranding by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When a brand name has become a negative influence in the decision process that make consumers use (or not) a product, a standart industry strategy is to change the brand name.

    It makes all sense for them to do it. On the other hand it also shows that the Gator brand name has aquired negative associations in people's minds (or so the Gator, now Claria, corporation believes) - this is a victory of sorts for those that tried to inform people about the evils of Gator products.

    To maintain the pressure on this company, a possible strategy to follow is to inform people that Claria = Gator, thus maintaining the negative association in people's minds.

    PS: I suspect they paid some expensive marketing consultant that told them that "Claria" brings sub-conscious mental associations with Clarity.

  53. OTHER NAME CHANGES by Vengie · · Score: 1

    In other news, Gator Corporation has changed its name to Claria Corporation. In still other, seemingly unrelated news, SPYWARE has changed its name to GATOR CORPORATION.



    (no)apologies to snl, lung cancer and altria...

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  54. But... by Angram · · Score: 0

    "You don't get any free content in return."

    What about the "Gator E-Wallet"? Technically it is a service/product.

    --

    GL
    1. Re:But... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Giving Gator your CC info etc?!?

      omg... god forbid...

    2. Re:But... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      What about the "Gator E-Wallet"? Technically it is a service/product.

      It might be a service/product if someone knowingly installed it, and the ads only displayed while it was in use. But this thing piggybacks in on other unrelated programs and tries to install itself when you click on a link in a popup, expecting to be taken to a webpage. Any "services" or "products" that Gator/Claria installs alongside itself are straw men probably designed to get around some law somewhere.

  55. Two can play that game. Three even. by babbage · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Gator^H^H^H^H^HClaria,

    Gator^H^H^H^H^HClaria is Spyware, you fuckers. Spyware. Spyware. Spyware.

    Please send me a nastygram. My career is stalled, and I could really use the publicity.

    Love,

    Wil Wheaton ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Chris Devers

    Linux/OSX weenie who doesn't even use your crappy SPYware.

    PS- It's spyware.

  56. Re:"moniker" by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    For an exploration of things, names, what they're called and what their names are called, go ask Alice

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  57. but... by Kegetys · · Score: 1

    Is there a Linux port available?

  58. Tsk Tsk by Chapium · · Score: 0

    All that beautiful gator promotional art gone to waste. *sigh*

  59. In related news... by WwWonka · · Score: 1, Funny

    Satan has changed his name to Cherry Creampuff.

  60. Nice vague name(not!) by aaaurgh · · Score: 1

    I worked for a company called System Art for a while, they wrote CRM software. They decided the name was too vague(!) and lacked impact so spent weeks coming up with a new one - they even got the contractors involved (I ducked out) in brain storming sessions and role playing scenarios - one guy had to pretend to be Nelson Mandela visiting the company!

    In the end, after all the sh1t, they opted for one of the two names that the direcors had originally come up with (surprise, surprise).

    What was this new miracle of marketing identity that would lead them into the next century? "Centrix"... like, duh! It didn't change the fact that the company was in trouble and the software design was crap!

    --

    Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
  61. anyone checked out the management team? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has anybody checked out the management team profile? it actually looks quite impressive, in terms of the academic level. compared to the guy from emarketersamerica, these people actually seem to constitute a strong team.

    but i wonder how, being educated where they were, did they come to such whacked ideas like running a shitware company.

    say, so what do those famous schools teach you? how to make profit with whatever it takes?

    1. Re:anyone checked out the management team? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart people do evil things for personal GAIN.

      And don't let "titles" fool you. Not only does the cream rise to the top, to quote Jesse The Body Venture, "The scum always rises to the top."

      All you need to do is look at the current occupier of the White House to realize that brains and abilities aren't required to acquire impressive titles.

  62. Someone needs to read The Cluetrain Manifesto by Malic · · Score: 1
    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
    1. Re:Someone needs to read The Cluetrain Manifesto by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I thought I'd click on that 'cluetrain.com' link. Haven't been to that site in years. I remembered it as being one of those 'Everything Is Completely Changed' websites that provided a considerable amount of the smoke and mirrors that fueled the dot.bomb frenzy.

      It doesn't seem to have changed at all. The authors of the page have a few valid points, but they run away with it in ways that many people have figured out how to shrug off.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  63. Better name by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they wanted better market perception, should've just changed their name to Philip Morris.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  64. Recursive acronym by Zapdos · · Score: 1

    Claria is the
    Loathing
    Asinine
    Renamed
    Intrusion
    Applic ation

  65. Clairia? by Griim · · Score: 1, Funny

    What the hell? That sounds like a little girl's name. Maybe they should call it something like Red Queen?

    "You're all going to die down here..."

  66. Rats by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

    Now I have to change my .sig again.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  67. Claria, *HELL* -- it's name should be Obscuria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn hidden spyware, even the name is an insult.

  68. lets publically deride the "Claria" name too by mwilliamson · · Score: 1
    CLARIA IS SPYWARE. ...now come get me Mr. laywer, I dare you.

    Since Gator Inc. is putting real money into changing their name, lets make sure that the term "Claria" is equated with exactly what they are peddling. Annoying crapmongering software that spys on what you are doing, sends interrupting ads, and slows your system/connection.

    When you think "Claria," don't just think "Spyware," think "Turd-Ware"

    1. Re:lets publically deride the "Claria" name too by marmoset · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps a "Google bombing" is in order. I'll go first:

      Get your spyware here. One-stop shopping for all your pop-up and pop-under needs.

      (the theory is, if enough people link the word spyware to Claria's site, it'll become an 'above the fold' first page hit for the search term on Google.)

      Let's fsck up their rebranding effort!

    2. Re:lets publically deride the "Claria" name too by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

      If a bunch of people put such things into their sigs, it will have a much greater effect that us talking about it in the threads.

    3. Re:lets publically deride the "Claria" name too by swschrad · · Score: 1

      evil claria.com
      crapware claria.com
      poisoning claria.com
      pinhead-weasels claria.com

      and on to the next contestant in the linking sweepstakes.....

      --
      if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  69. A rose by any other name... by herrvinny · · Score: 0

    would still smell as sweet. Gator by any other name would still smell as BAD!! SPYWARE, SPYWARE, SPYWARE!!! Or if you don't like that, what about loserware, slows-down-your-computerware, fuck-offware, virusware, a-piece-of-crapware, and all the other -wares.

  70. clearly, pliny was not consulted by Ravagin · · Score: 1

    While "claria" has several latin meanings involving shining brightly or being clear or bright, whitaker's Words also cites it as a "beetle infesting beehives."

    Niiiiice.

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

  71. This Just In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to all the negative publicity, Claria, formerly known as GATOR, has just changed it's name to Oceania. But don't worry, their sound business model and high quality software remains the same.

    Double plus good!

  72. We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Currently, there are a couple vendors that provide "remote, automated guru service". Symantec and a few antivirus vendors look for malware using a series of tests devised and constantly updated by experts, and then applied to many, many computers.

    Ad-Aware searches for spyware and adware.

    Windows Update searches for updates to Microsoft software.

    There are websites that will scan your computer for basic remote security holes.

    The problem is that there is a growing number of components that do automated guru tasks, because there isn't enough gurus, enough time, or enough money to take a guru out to each house or even work each machine remotely. People don't need to know about each field, as a result, but *do* need to be aware that such software is necessary in each field and run it/buy it/whatnot. What's needed is some (probably commercial and relatively inexpensive) comprehensive "Complete Computer Maintenance Service". It'd do automated virus checking (might do a partnership with Symantec to use their engine), look for spyware/adware, provide updates from *all* software vendors, warn about security issues with your current setup, look for common misconfigurations, warn about discontinued software that you're still using, provide simple flowchart based troubleshooting and possibly fix-it wizards (Outlook doesn't work), etc. The big benefit is that currently almost all home machines are unadministered, and this could be done quite cheaply, because it scales. Hell, OEMs could bundle service like this.

    The important thing is that each machine must *never* require actual individual attention from a human being, or else costs shoot up (though perhaps optional commercial phone support could provided as a separate service). The base service should be on the order of $10/month at most. It'd keep IT costs down and keep small businesses and home systems much more maintained than they are now.

    My suggestions here were somewhat Windows-centric, mostly because most current Linux folks *need* someone else administering their box, but that will probably change as well.

    This is also something that "Joe Sixpack" publications like PC World could easily review ("service foo caught more problems on our ten test machines that service bar did").

    Finally, a corporate version of this service could also be sold to even places that can afford in-house IT staff (one that pops up its reports on a centralized control machine in an IT center). That makes a *good* first pass for IT personnel (so they don't blow time on ordinary tasks), helps keep up on problems with specific software that no single IT guy can possibly keep up on, and makes the service money.

    1. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      The problem is that there is a growing number of components that do automated guru tasks, because there isn't enough gurus, enough time, or enough money to take a guru out to each house or even work each machine remotely.

      True, but there are plenty of unemployed "web developers" (html or frontpage monkeys) who could be perhaps taught to troubleshoot these enough to run adaware and cleanup a machine.

    2. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      What's needed is some (probably commercial and relatively inexpensive) comprehensive "Complete Computer Maintenance Service".


      What we also need is flying cars. They should also be rlatively inexpensive. And safe - at least as safe as terrestrial automobiles. That includes maintenance. And they should be easy to fly with minimal training.

      Of course - history shows that the devil's in the details of implementation. The closest we have come in decades of flying car ideas is a long line of prototypes.

      I appreciate ideas that go beyond the status quo. But at the same time, I can't help to think that sometimes people who toss them around have a distinct lack of appreciation for the details and complexities involved.
    3. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by ShadarLogoth · · Score: 1

      Pfft! clearly you need to get in the know. Aol 9.0 will do all of these things *and* your laundry!

      It'll even prevent all the hot aol girlies from dating gurus who fix their computers..

      Isn't that how you got all *your* dates?

      --Shadar

    4. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Yes, prototypes like the Moller Skycar. I heard the MSRP was going to be about a million dollars, when the FAA certifies it for sale.

    5. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by joto · · Score: 1
      Yes, prototypes like the Moller Skycar. I heard the MSRP was going to be about a million dollars, when the FAA certifies it for sale.

      Oh please. Mr Moller has been working on this skycar of his since the 1960s, and during that period he has always been just a few years from completion. In the meantime, he has used about any trick of deceptive advertising in the book in order to lure money from easily fooled investors and geeks.

      Given the number of years Moller has been at this, and the lack of success so far (he hasn't even done one untethered flight, I have high doubts if Mr. Moller will ever reach the age where a skycar (his or someone else's) will ever fly.

    6. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Okay, fine. Tell me what's wrong with the suggestion.

      There are automated tools that provide subsets of such a service.

      There are (extremely expensive) services that provide such services by physically sending people out to locations to perform essentially the same task each time.

      Where is the bad assumption?

      Flying cars require technological sophistication, require a *market* and a set of recognizable benefits other than novelty, and have significant social barriers (look how dangerous people are with normal old ground-crawling cars and imagine them flying wherever they want).

      I'm willing to recognize problems with such a proposal, but you'll have to air your objection for me to do so.

    7. Re:We need a goddamn fix and there's money in it by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      Alright. It might have been a bit unfair to compare your idea to flying cars. You'll have to forgive me for overstating the issue to make a point. And the point is that while the idea sounds good, there are lots of details that make it far less trivial than it sounds.



      Okay, fine. Tell me what's wrong with the suggestion.

      There are automated tools that provide subsets of such a service.

      There are (extremely expensive) services that provide such services by physically sending people out to locations to perform essentially the same task each time.

      Where is the bad assumption?


      In your origional post, you stated:

      The important thing is that each machine must *never* require actual individual attention from a human being, or else costs shoot up (though perhaps optional commercial phone support could provided as a separate service). The base service should be on the order of $10/month at most. It'd keep IT costs down and keep small businesses and home systems much more maintained than they are now.

      And that is where we run in to trouble. The current automated tools will still run in to cases where they need human interaction.

      Bundling these tools together in to one product offering makes sense. And, in fact, its been done in a similar manner with Symantec's Internet Security product. This package includes an antivirus, personal firewall, spam filter, content filter, etc. These are all components one can find individually from different vendors or, in fact, Symantec themselves - bundled.

      The difference between Symantec's product and what you're proposing is the overall intent. You're talking about a "guru in a box". The expectation there is that either the customer can get a live person to help them in difficult situations or the software itself is 100% self-reliant. Symantec doesn't make any such claim with their product (or do they?).
  73. Help for a better Claria. by LeGarcia · · Score: 1

    From the Claria Website:

    Tell us how we're doing or give us an idea on how to make it better.
    at http://www.claria.com/contact/ or just click here

    GIVE'EM HELL!!! (I already did) =^)

    LE+

  74. Windows & IE are the problem because they allo by jay_in_pa · · Score: 1

    I don't have any adware/spyware/virus problems with MacOS X or Linux with Mozilla or Safari.

    The simple reason is, that they don't allow things like this to work by Default.

  75. Exactly why we need a stronger term than SPYware by MikShapi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And this is why this sort of software should be called RAPEware.

    Last I checked, violating someone without his/her consent, against his will, and giving him no ability to stop it when he asks to is called RAPE in the English language.
    I see no reason why the term cannot apply to one's computer.

    --
    -
  76. Let me be one of the first to say by jcrash · · Score: 1

    Claria is SPYWARE

    --
    I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
  77. Hmm by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the name of an STD.

    --
    http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  78. Re:I just mailed claria.co.uk the headphone compan by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Damn, we need a couple of expensive headsets where I work, but Claria (the headset company, not the spyware company) doesn't have the ability to do online ordering. I'd have happily recommended purchasing from Claria.

  79. Re:I just mailed claria.co.uk the headphone compan by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    I did exactly the same, and in less than 20 minutes I got a response that wasn't automated. I didn't realize corpoglomerates did that any more.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  80. How Smart! by fetus · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news, Saddam Hussein has legally changed his name to Charlie Brown. George Bush and children around the world rejoice and they laugh together at the funny antics and antidotes of Iraq's leader and his funny dog Uday.

  81. Why do Windows users get all of the ads?!?! by naelurec · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why is it that Claria only supports Windows?!! Am I, a FreeBSD user not worthy of being advertised to? No Gator, no popups in Mozilla .. Well .. atleast I still have my spam email..

  82. PR speeling erroors. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a moniker which has become involved in allegations of spyware."

    Shouldn't that be "a moniker which has become involved in alligator spyware"?

    Fscking spyware crap...

  83. Re:Never name your company the same as your produc by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Interestingly enough though, firestone still managed to ai market share on rival Goodyear. Talk about bad manageent, goodyear managed to turn vry public bad news about a compititor into a loss for them. I'm not much a manager, but I think I could do better.

  84. bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "online behavioral marketing" .. and thats not considered spyware? they are still bastards :P

  85. Claria instantly reminded me of this name.. by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Funny
    Chlamydia.

    Come to think of it, so did the name Gator.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Claria instantly reminded me of this name.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're hanging around with the wrong kind of chicks, dude.

    2. Re:Claria instantly reminded me of this name.. by DrDoombender · · Score: 1

      Here are some other names that Claria/Gator plan on using in the future.

      Communist party/KGB, U-2, Voyeurists, RIAA, MPAA, Telepaths inc., el-diablo, mephisto, Carnivore, Devourer, Soul Eater....any other names?

      Claria/Gator's Product offerings:
      Spyware which reports info. about users
      Sinks your clock (whoo!)
      lots and lots of pop-ups
      Crash your computer
      Use up bandwidth.

      hrm....changing their name though. Like a con-artist with many aliases.

      Anyway, I figured I'd get on the Gator bashing too because I'm sick of their interpretation of a so called useful product.

  86. Re:Exactly why we need a stronger term than SPYwar by elf-fire · · Score: 1

    Get real! I would rather have 100 or more spyware programs on my PC than to be raped one single time. Yes, spyware is annoying, but to compare it to a physical assault is outrageous.

  87. Domains to block... by jefftp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a list of Claria's domains where downloads are available:

    gator.com
    claria.com
    searchscout.com
    precisio n-time.com
    weatherscope.com
    date-manager.com

    If you're running a web caching system, block on those domains and your users are protected from unnecessary help desk calls.

  88. Easy to explain the name.... by r_cerq · · Score: 1

    Anyone benefiting from their spyware will now be able to anser:
    Customer: "How the hell do you know I like that?"
    Low-Life Advertiser: "Clariavoinacy!"

  89. Marketing trumps common sense again by mwood · · Score: 1

    Maybe, just maybe, learning to speak clearly and fully and precisely would go a lot further toward communicating the breadth of their offerings to the customer than does replacing one meaningless noise with another.

    Maybe it was Friday afternoon, everybody was too full of unicorn to come up with anything useful, but they hadn't issued any memos lately to justify their existence, so: Claria!

  90. Call to arms by dr.+electron · · Score: 1

    Now, everybody should put a link on the 'links' page (or any other page of their choise), naming the link "Spyware" and pointing it to: http://www.claria.com/

    Like: <a href="http://www.claria.com/">Spyware</a>

    And guess what google will do? Yes, correct :-)

  91. Another thing to answer No to... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

    "Always install software from Claria Corporation?"

  92. Too much pharmacutical telivision by DenialX · · Score: 1

    I guess cholera was taken...hmm lets try a name that sounds like a new alergy perscription instead.

    --
    - DenialX
  93. "Inciteful"? Explain yourself... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    You're about due a regime change over there, aren't you?

  94. Nameless names by colmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a growing trend in corporate business. During industrial times companies were named after their primary product or, occasionally, the name of the founder.

    General Motors, International Business Machines, etc. etc.

    Now that corporations are increasingly involved in the amorphous "business" of owning each other and outsourcing, they'd rather people NOT know who they are. So brands are given memorable descriptive names, but the names of the financial entities behind them are designed to slide off the memory. Altria, Worldcom, etc.

    Frankly I find this all very scary. The current nightmare future of corporations replacing governments doesn't have any Gibson-like overtness to it. People won't swear allegiance to Coca-Cola or fight for the Microsoft army. Rather the entities with all the power in the world will gradually become more and more vague and more and more distant from the popular conciousness. And not as the result of some sinsiter conspiracy, but rather the natural result of market trends.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:Nameless names by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Altria, Worldcom . . . Canopy

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  95. Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Create a virus

    2. Claim that it is 'online behavioral marketing' software

    3. Profit

    Rinse, Wash, Change the name, Repeat

  96. Claris by g0at · · Score: 1

    I wonder what Filemaker Inc. thinks of this.

    -ben

  97. In Other News...Happy Chrysanthemums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The US military is changing the name of its enormous, 7.5 ton BL-82 "Daisy Cutter" bomb, as were used in Afghanistan, to the new name of "Happy Moon and Stars Chrysanthemum" to invoke mental images of playful Chinese fireworks instead of ungodly flaming death and destruction.

  98. Re:Exactly why we need a stronger term than SPYwar by IM6100 · · Score: 1

    You seem to have assigned a meaning to 'joystick port' that few of the rest of us use. Are you sure you're not a little more involved with that mere machine than you should be?

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  99. new name by 56ksucks · · Score: 1
    So basically, enough people have wised up to the pop up box that asks for permission to install gator that they have to change the name so people won't recognise it. People should really wise up to the face that unless you know exactly what that little pop up box is going to do to your system, and you approve, you should NEVER choose yes!

    ----

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

    1. Re:new name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like your user name, but I liked it better when I misread it as "k56sucks," a play on "k56flex." Perhaps you should consider changing it.

  100. Let me be the first to say it... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    1. Cook up harebrained business model
    2. Omit "???" step
    3. PROFIT!

    BTW, I'm patenting that business process model, so ya'll better get your checkbooks warmed up!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  101. DO NOT look at laser with remaining good eye by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  102. Worked for Phillip Morris by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    so why shouldn't it work fot the gator?

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  103. No, that's not the problem by lokedhs · · Score: 1
    Sounds simple doesn't it? It's not quite accurate though.

    You are probably referring to the fact that a userland application can't mess with the OS installation. However, I could easily write an application that mimics Gator eWallet that would run in GNOME and Mozilla/Galeon/Epiphany.

    The only reason these things doesn't exist (or at least very rare) for Linux is that there aren't enough clueless users yet. If they switch from Windows you can be sure that the spyware will follow.

    Linux does make it a lot easier to identify spyware though. Fewer places to look, and contrary to windows you can always trace what is happening.

  104. Why do you hate clara by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If their intentions are to profit??

    McDonalds cuts the amazon trees to profit. BP and shell pollute the environment to profit. Companies know the cure to AIDS but keep it secret to profit and the scouts sell the cocaine, to profit. If you manage to be rich, we congratulate you, no matter how you managed it, and this is what we do in corporate america. May teh best man win.

  105. Claria is spyware! by theghost · · Score: 1

    Got keep up with the times. Wouldn't want to miss my chance at being hit with a lawsuit because they thought i wasn't talking about them.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  106. User Awareness is Key by chengrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As many on this board are aware, PC Pitstop launched a major awareness campaign about Gator and its activities. Gator in turn sued us, and we finally settled and the terms of this agreement are confidential. However, we'd like to post our opinion about Gator's recent name change.

    We believe that the only solution to this problem is one of awareness. When a user sees a Gator Active X, it must be eventually engrained into their heads to click NO. Gator is indeed clever, because by changing names, it makes an awareness campaign more difficult and also expensive. By analyzing the recent moves, it seems that Claria is comprised of three organizations:

    GAIN Publishing - This organization contains the software packages eWallet, Precision Time, Date Manager, and Weatherscope, and also the GAIN network. GAIN Publishing is also responsible for selling the advertising on the GAIN Network. Note: It seems that recently Gator/Claria has changed the name on their Active X certificates from Gator Inc to GAIN Publishing.

    Search Scout - Search Scout is a product of their relationship with Overture. This organization is responsible for managing the Overture relationship, and also determining in which situations Search Scout will over ride the user's browsing experience. Note: We have recently discovered that Search Scout pops up not only when Google or other web searches but on specific sites. For example, I was listening to Gateway's earnings conference call, and Search Scout popped a full page window, with the title "Looking to purchase a computer?".

    Feedback Research - It seems that this is a new organization. It seems that the purpose of this organization is to run targetted surveys to users of the GAIN network. We recently have found (and have screen shots) of a survey that Feedback Research is running to users of the Google Toolbar.

    Claria is a smart company. Their name change is good evidence that they are trying to keep ahead of the rising anti Gator sentiment on the internet. So we just need to be smarter. Here are a few ideas to hopefully spur more awareness:

    1. Companies UNITE. One thing that I have learned from slash dot is that the impact on company's productivity and expenses is more measurable than to individual consumers.

    2. Know the beast - I hate to say this. But I want to encourage everyone to install Gator on your PC to know what it is doing. It is clear that Gator/Claria is constantly changing its tactics to its environment, and the more eyes watching their behaviour the better. Of course, uninstall the software before it gets to be too aggravating.

    3. Tell everyone you know - No one is protected against Gator. It can show up on anyone's computer at any time. So everyone needs to know about Gator.

    4. Tell your company not to advertise with Gator and/or Overture.

  107. In the words of the late/great Bill Hicks... by Luketh · · Score: 1

    How the hell do they live with themselves? I bet they sleep like fucking babies at night.

    --
    A computer without a Microsoft Operating System is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
  108. Way better! by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    I can now say Fuck Claria w/o subconscious fear for my member!

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  109. And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cancer changes its name to Gator.

  110. Change of name every few weeks soon? by Denyer · · Score: 1

    Although the baseline IQ of populations doesn't alter much (and that of computer users frequently dips as home units become more widespread...) existing IT-using populations do learn eventually.

    Some even learn to look out for behaviour rather than software names... I predict Claria won't be the last rebadging, anyway...

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  111. Thank God for faux-Latin nonsense words! by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Otherwise evil companies would have now way to escape their own reputations!

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  112. Don't have product name==company name, or do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did you know Bridgestone is the parent company of Firestone? Of course you didn't. And while you would probably think twice about buying a Firestone tire for your SUV (even though it was only one model of tire involved out of Firestone's entire lineup), you wouldn't think twice about putting on a Bridgestone tire.

    Huh? What if Bridgestone tires had been failing? What would Bridgestone, Inc. have done then? And yes, I did know that Firestone was made by Bridgestone before the story came out. In case I forgot, each newspaper article reminded me.


    And by the way, there are plenty of examples of companies renaming themselves after their most (or only) successful product.

  113. Re:Never name your company the same as your produc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know Bridgestone is the parent company of Firestone? Of course you didn't.

    Of course we didn't. Because nobody on slashdot knows as much as you.

    Arrogant prick...

  114. Re:I just mailed claria.co.uk the headphone compan by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

    What kind of response did you get?

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  115. Transitive Property of equality by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
    a=b and b=c implies a=c

    Gator = Spyware and Claria = Gator

    Therefore, Claria = Spyware.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  116. Someone has to say it... by metalslinger · · Score: 1

    This means victory. Of course they don't want it to look that way but here's the deal. Gator's been getting ton's a bad publicity. They need people to want to advertise with them, but no one wants bad publicity. They can sue the public into giving good publicity to them, that would be impossible. So the only thing they can do is pretend that they have come out with a better way of making people believe they are good, gaining good customers along the way, while in the background losing the gator stigma. The only way to get rid of them for good is to keep giving them a bad name. Instead of Gator is bad now we need to push Claria is bad. They're in a public arena and when the public looks to them as bad they can't sell ads for the public. When they can't sell ads they go out of business. So round one is done and we've won. Now onto round two.

    --
    /. Heroics - 99.999%
  117. Eeew by davmoo · · Score: 1

    We could also change the name of "dogshit", but it will still stink just as bad.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  118. They were thinking ahead... by ydnar · · Score: 1

    [ydnar@akiba ydnar]$ whois clariasucks.com
    [whois.crsnic.net]

    Whois Server Version 1.3

    Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
    with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
    for detailed information.

    Domain Name: CLARIASUCKS.COM
    Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
    Whois Server: whois.register.com
    Referral URL: http://www.register.com
    Name Server: DNS9.REGISTER.COM
    Name Server: DNS10.REGISTER.COM
    Status: ACTIVE
    Updated Date: 03-sep-2003
    Creation Date: 03-sep-2003
    Expiration Date: 03-sep-2004

    >>> Last update of whois database: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 06:24:03 EST <<<

    NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
    registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
    currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
    date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
    registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
    view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

    TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
    database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
    automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
    modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
    Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
    information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
    about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
    guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
    by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
    for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
    to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
    unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
    or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
    that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
    repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
    prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
    use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
    query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
    domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
    to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
    operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
    Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
    reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

    The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
    Registrars.

    [whois.register.com]

    The data in Register.com's WHOIS database is provided to you by
    Register.com for information purposes only, that is, to assist you in
    obtaining information about or related to a domain name registration
    record. Register.com makes this information available "as is," and
    does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a WHOIS query, you
    agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that,
    under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1) allow, enable,
    or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial
    advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic mail, or by
    telephone; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
    that apply to Register.com (or its systems). The compilation,
    repackaging, dissemination or other use of this data is expressly
    prohibited without the prior written consent of Register.com.
    Register.com reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
    By submitting this query, yo

  119. Does this mean we can freely call Gator spyware? by camusflage · · Score: 1

    As long as we say that Gator, and not Claria, is spyware, we won't be sued?

    Please then, allow me to be one of the first to say.. Claria is spyware.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  120. Claria headsets: where I've heard that name before by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    I was wondering where I had heard the name "Claria" before. Then something jogged my memory.

    Claria is the trademarked name of a line of headsets produced by HEADSETS 4U HEADSETS 4U - About us. I had been involved in a purchase decision for headsets for use Emergency Room, Intensive Care Unit, and switchboard and help desk settings in a mid-sized hospital; the Claria headsets were found to be suitable.

    I've sent a note to their CEO about the possible trademark infraction. The name confusion between their product and ex-Gator is obviously not to their benefit.

  121. "Claria" is unclear by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Really, if you don't see the fnords, they won't eat you....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  122. I'll take Claria-D, please by apoupc · · Score: 1

    Is there a decongestant version that they offer? They can call it Claria-D... which could be Claria without the congestion of spyware.

  123. Claria... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...rhymes with malaria. Yup, it's pestilence.

  124. Shouldn't it be manSE.cx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now it just sounds like "mankex".

  125. someone should sue? but who??? by camperslo · · Score: 1

    Apple Computer should sue because Claria sounds too much like Claris and would reflect negatively

    Apple Records should sue because anything that reflects negatively on Apple Computer may reflect negatively on them.

    Farmers should sue because anything that reflects negatively on apples is bad for them.

    Microsoft is in there somewhere too, as groundwater contamination from Windows-loaded drives in discarded PCs is known to cause worms in apples, at least on Halloween.

    Zoo-keepers should sue because Gator carries a more negative feeling than those lovable reptiles deserve.

    Maybe no one should sue, just feed the Gator execs to the gators instead? Season to taste adding lawyers.

  126. Dave Barry said it best: by Brett+Glass · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Changing names is a sound idea, an idea based on the scientific principle that underlies the field of marketing, which is: People are stupid. Marketing experts know that if you call something by a different name, people will believe it's a different thing.

    That's how "undertakers" became "funeral directors." That's how "trailers" became "manufactured housing." That's how "We're putting you on hold for the next decade" became "Your call is important to us."

    --Dave Barry

  127. No you wouldn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  128. Great Name! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What's good about this name is that when the business plan fails they can start selling allergy medicine!

  129. More damage by temojen · · Score: 1

    4) Increased helpdesk workload as the bookkeeper keeps calling the helpdesk with vague descriptions about "my computer says everything I do is being watched" == direct financial damages
    5) Increased power bill due to all those stolen transistor state-changes. == direct financial damages
    6) Increased equipment failures as all those infested Laptop HDDs spin up and down every 30 seconds == direct financial damages
    7) Increased Labour costs researching how to really remove gator and all it's components == direct financial damages

    If someone starts a class action that I'm in the class of (Canadian, technician for a company that had an infestation, but my own computer (*NIX) was never infested) I'll join.

  130. If it looks like a reptile by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1

    smells like a reptile, and acts like a reptile, its a reptile. Giving it a pretty name doesn't change the fact its a slimy creature you should never turn your back on.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  131. reasons... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    The reason they changed the name is the CEO went to a cocktail party, and someone asked him what he does:

    "Well - I'm the CEO of Gator Corpora^@#"*gets punched in face*

    BTW, you think people would pay money to see Alan Ralsky, Darl McBride and this guy get the crap beat out of them? Or at least make arrangements to have the crap kicked out of them?

  132. Quote translation: by Dracos · · Score: 1
    "We feel that the Claria Corporation name will allow us to better communicate the expanding breadth of offerings that we provide to consumers and advertisers."

    In layman's terms: "'Gator' has to much brand recognition. We feel we can better serve our advertisers under a name no consumer has heard of."

  133. Re:I just mailed claria.co.uk the headphone compan by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    You certainly should have been modded up. The response I got was...

    Jeffrey

    Thank you for this notofication

    Regards

    Neil

    Nothing terribly exciting, but at least they made an effort, and obviously got the message.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  134. You can polish a turd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but it's still a turd. :)

  135. to paraphrase Shakespeare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An asshole by any other name, would still stink.

  136. images by DanDan · · Score: 1

    Our proxy blocks gator.com, but not (yet) claria.com. All the images on claria.com are hosted on images.gator.com, so the home page shows up as just a bunch of broken images, a few of which have ALT tags. Funny.

  137. Yeah, but... by LNN · · Score: 1

    ...does it run Linux?

  138. Ohhh...I was way off by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    I thought gator was a pain in the ass spy ware program slowing down my friends' computers. But now it's this claria. It's not spyware, it's behavior marketting. Didn't you guys see those people with happy faces on their website? They're happy because their behavior is being marketted. yay

  139. Re:"Inciteful"? Explain yourself... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    Heh. Go troll somewhere else, child. Democratic Underground, perhaps. They'll like your loaded phrases and insinuations over there.

    And if you don't get the wordplay between Insightful and Inciteful, I'm certainly not going to bother explaining it.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  140. Re:I just mailed claria.co.uk the headphone compan by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

    Yeah, at least they replied. I don't know anything about Claria. Perhaps they are small enough to not have an automated reply for emails or maybe they are just shooting for the customer service. Anyway, it was nice that they replied.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  141. Riiiight.... by Down8 · · Score: 1

    Claria is spyware.

    Come and get me.

    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  142. Altria by Breconides · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Philip Morris, which changed it's name to Altria "to better clarify its identity as the owner of both food and tobacco companies that manage some of the world's most successful brands.

    http://www.altria.com/

    -Luke

  143. As Jesse Jackson once said by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    an attempt to distance the company from a moniker which has become involved in allegations of spyware.

    I deny the allegations, I deny the alligator, and I deny the Gator too!

  144. Remember Philip Morris? by wonton_mein · · Score: 1

    Ha. Remember Philip Morris changed its name to Altria? Now Gator is Claria. Nice.

  145. Boy am I relieved by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    It's hard to use this nickname with Gator around. Everybody thinks they're the first to make a pop-up joke around me.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  146. Reasonable by Kelz · · Score: 1

    We feel that the Claria Corporation name will allow us to better communicate the expanding breadth of offerings that we provide to consumers and advertisers.

    The reason for this change is simple: Gator is too well known as adware.
    Though claria reminds me of malaria or chlamydia, people will likely be less suspicious of it, as the name isn't said with a spit after it.

  147. A turd by any name by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Whatever you want to do is fine by me, and you can call it anything you want as long as you don't infringe on one of my own trademarks, but if you install your crap on my pc without my express consent or knowledge, you're guilty of a serious crime, period.

    I don't think gator actually installs that way, but some spyware installers have used remote exploits in IE to do it. If I run a windows box, I only do so because it's needed for applications. It's not appropriate for people to install things on my computer without my consent, regardless of whether they are able to do so or not.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  148. People are not stupid by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    It's this attitude that is the problem really. People are not stupid for ending up with these spyware things on their machines... it takes a real knowledge of what's going on on the web, and an innate distrust of things to spot these things easily.

    With the amount of things that say "Your internet connection has been tested and is slow, click here to fix" and things like that, to someone who doesn't know any better seem like a reasonable thing to click on.

    The Gator popups seem somewhat reasonable if you aren't initially thinking that all things that popup without your asking are bad.

    You may well say "Well people should learn more about these things before they get on the internet"... well, maybe so, but then also the internet is all pervasive now, and whether you like it or not you sort of almost need to get on it these days... and its the people who are just curious, or need to get online to read the e-mails from their family overseas etc who are most vunerable... in fact I have an Aunt who is around 70 or so, and just got Broadband internet installed... and I'm heading over to her place on the weekend (She's interstate), and I hate to think what's been installed on her machine after just 4 weeks of having it installed.

    And trying to say "Well, install Firebird then, that stops all sorts of things", yeah, and it also makes playing back streaming video and almost anything needing a plugin a nightmare... I'm yet to have it playback streaming Windows Media files as theres no obvious way to have a plugin installed for it... and if I can't work it out, there's no way she would.

    Stop thinking everyone thinks like a geek or is dumb... there's many different ways of thinking, and they aren't all IT-centric

    1. Re:People are not stupid by furasato · · Score: 1

      Very true. There are many people out there that do tasks in the work field that I know I am not capable of. Run a car dealership? Heck, I wouldnt know the first thing about it. Doesnt mean I am dumb. Same logic that applies to general users and computers. I dont expect any of my clients to know that a subnet it, the 7 OSI layers, and so forth. But, I do know that I need to put controls on thier PCs to prevent them from making mistakes, like installing Gator/Claria. And truthfully, some of them really don't need to be on a PC in a corporate enviroment. If all they did was to do their job, go where they are only supposed to, my job would be alot easier. But many times, they go in search of porn during thier shifts, and if they have admin access, shit gets installed. Then, they complain and state they need new computers. I just clean thier PCs off, and let thier supervisors know where they have tried to go on the net, and let the supervisors handle it.

  149. Next Name Change to X? by IgnacioB · · Score: 1

    Why not change their name to X, ACME, or WeDontSpy, or SlashDotSux? They will still get Slashdotted, gain a little press, and make AdAware and the other companies to add one more line of code. Why not setup accross the street from their HQ with trebuches and fling the corpses of spammers through the front window? No? OK how about actual cans of SPAM?

    1. Re:Next Name Change to X? by Backov · · Score: 1

      I prefer to use live spammers, it's more humane.

      --
      In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  150. Claris? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Surprised that 'Claris' hasn't been mentioned yet.
    Don't Apple own this trademark? If so, aren't they going to sue Claria's asses into oblivion?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  151. Re:"moniker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story is about Gator, not about your ignorance of the English language, nor your inability to use a dictionary.

  152. MOD PARENT UP by yelohbird · · Score: 1

    Insightful!

    --
    h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-slash-dot-dot-org
  153. We have a responsibility! by thenoog · · Score: 1

    Take whatever opportunities present to spread the word. Make web pages with 'Gator' on them that say "Claria" is their new name. Better yet, why not lobby Google to substitute the word "Claria" every time 'Gator' is searched for...

    --
    - In a knowledge based industry your main asset will always be people -
  154. let me be the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to say it. Claria is SPYWARE!

  155. TIA is a DARPA project by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    Here's a government link:

    http://www.darpa.mil/body/tia/tia_report_page.htm

    And here's some others (remove the Slashdot spaces):

    http://www.epic.org/privacy/profiling/tia/

    http://www.isn.ethz.ch/researchpub/publihouse/info security/volume_10/C3/C3_index.htm

    http://www.eff.org/Privacy/TIA/20030523_tia_report _review.php

    http://havenworks.com/military/tia-total-informati on-awareness/

    Quizo69

  156. Well, at least they won't last very long... by rakslice · · Score: 1

    I bet a shiny new nickel (it's a Canadian one, currently up to a balmy 3.80 US cents) that the former Gator Co. is going to get their pants sued off by Clarica for trademark infringement.

  157. lockpicking book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quality lockpicking book for sale at http://cafeshops.com/hackingtexts

  158. Re:"moniker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gator ? Hasn't it become Claria ?
    BTW, it is not my ignorance of the English language but of your slang, there's a big difference, here, ArschLoch.

  159. Re:Does this mean we can freely call Gator spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please then, allow me to be one of the first to say.. Claria is spyware.

    Don't say it to /. Say it to them. They would love to hear from you.

    If you want you can tell them again and again.

    Or if you don't want to use those forms, you can simply email, call, or fax them:

    info@claria.com
    jobs@claria.com
    support@feedba ckresearch.com
    Tel: 650-232-0300
    Fax: 650-232-0400

  160. the problem with mega-packages by ailaG · · Score: 1

    you mentioned teaming up with symantec and all that. the problem with your package (although it does sound good) is just that -- this software's vendor chooses symantec for you. if a new antivirus software company wants to start working, they'll have an awfully tough time, since everyone is using your mega-solution, and symantec already provides the antivirus protection there. in comparison, many of the other features of your program would cause similar effects in other "fields" of software and maintainance. what i just described is the rise of a monopoly. we all complain about microsoft, people comment that they have programs like IE built-in, so users don't download other browsers. same thing goes for anything else in windows. what you're suggesting is another microsoft.. what you can build, however, is a program that does your clicking for you, like you suggested. i.e. something that checks which programs you have installed, and updates them for you, all at once.

    --
    -= ailaG =-
    1. Re:the problem with mega-packages by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      That's a legitimate concern, but there's little barrier to entry (other than the fact that it may be hard to compete with so much *stuff*).

      McAfee can easily partner with another major IT services provider that wants to do something like this.

      I can't see people being easily locked in to something like this, though I could be wrong.

  161. Re:Exactly why we need a stronger term than SPYwar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong! Rape only refers to vialation of sexual context. Since computers are not capable of reproducing computers, it cannot possibly be a rape.

  162. Re:Exactly why we need a stronger term than SPYwar by MikShapi · · Score: 1

    The three orders of magnitude that exist between robbing a store and robbing a couple of billion from wherever the US treasury stores it doens't mean that the former is less of a 'robbery' than the latter. The term applies to both regardless of severity.
    Yes, getting raped yourself is less fun than having your computer raped, but it's still rape.

    And as for that 'rape applies only to sex' comment, we do 'base-rape' when we play tribes, don't we? (or is it something else you've been doing with the mortar each time the rest of us were flattening enemy installations? ;-)

    --
    -
  163. Claria by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    It's clar, ya shouldn't install any of their shyte.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  164. admin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i just lock everyone out of access on their PCs with win2k at the office.

    sure, the accounting broads get mad "why can't i install flash on my computer? what do you mean i'm locked out, do you think we're children? well, no, it's not for work"

    after putting them in their place, if it's somewhere that isn't crap, i'll install it for them, and let them know it's for their own protection.

    admins who let users (stupid idiots) install apps on their own are asking for trouble.

  165. presidential candidate using gator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was removing gator/gain from my parents' computer and noticed ads for johnkerry.com on it.

    A leader of the free world he will never be. Not even Bush/Ashcroft would buy that cr*p.