Slashdot Mirror


Disposable Cell Phones Arrive

headGasket writes "After the disposable cameras, here comes the disposable cell phones. Ideal for trash talk. Seriously, there is a $5 incentive to not dispose of it in the trash and bring it back for a rebate on the next one." These seem like a nice alternative to being locked into a lengthy contract, or for people who only need a cell phone for a short period of time.

434 comments

  1. Reception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would imagine with disposable-grade aerial setups you would get weak reception? If I have to jump into an 80's time warp to get equal reception i'm out :)

  2. Wop Hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a cell phone that works with my tin-foil hat!

    FP?

    1. Re:Wop Hoo! by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Works with your tin-foil hat? These phones are made for tin-foil hat wearers!

      What more could you ask for.
      No contract. Anonymity. Low Prices. That's how cell phones are supposed to work. Don't want the man listening in on my phone calls.

      Hrmph. I think my tin-foil hat is too tight.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:Wop Hoo! by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Definitely - take a look at this:
      http://www.hop-on.com/headset.html

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    3. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh. I bet it will be very popular with drug dealers, criminals and terrorists.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    4. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Or anybody who thinks that their phone habits are NOBODY ELSE'S DAMN BUSINESS.

      You'd do well to remember that your neighbors' habits are not accountable to you.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      " Or anybody who thinks that their phone habits are NOBODY ELSE'S DAMN BUSINESS"

      What country do you live in? In the US your phone habits are the business of the US govt, more specifically the justice dept anti-terrorism division.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    6. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh, NO, they're NOT.

      In case you're wondering, yes, I am in favor of RADICALLY reducing the number of wiretap and eavesdropping authorizations that law enforcement currently enjoys.

      The law is wrong.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I am in favor of RADICALLY reducing the number of wiretap and eavesdropping authorizations that law enforcement currently enjoys."

      Vote for a democrat next time then.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    8. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What difference will that make?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Wop Hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no shit!! They voted that crap into law too. They controlled the Senate at the time so they should share the blame.

    10. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      As a general rule democrats are less likely to trust police. Besides they can't possibly be worse.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    11. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      As a general rule, Democrats want to take away just as many of my civil rights as Republicans do. When one controls the Executive and the other controls the Legislature, we get the double-deuce.

      If there was a party that reliably paid attention to the WHOLE CONSTITUTION, they'd get my vote every time. But, of course, since they'd be neither Republican nor Democrat, they will never have a prayer of getting their agenda realized.

      So, tell me again: What's voting for? Since the Reps and Dems control the entire process to the exclusion of parties that might actually serve the public good, what difference is it going to make?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      " As a general rule, Democrats want to take away just as many of my civil rights as Republicans do"

      I really don't think so.

      "If there was a party that reliably paid attention to the WHOLE CONSTITUTION, they'd get my vote every time."

      There are parties that claim to do that. There is for example the the constitution party. Also most of the Militia movement also claims to want to go back to protecting the constitution. I don't know you but if you are like most Americans there is little chance you'll find much to like in either one of those parties though.

      "So, tell me again: What's voting for?"

      The lesser of two evils. That's all you get in a winner take all system. Pick the issues important to you and vote for the candidates that are least likely to undermine those issues. In your case, if creeping police power is important you should vote for Democrats. Why? Liberterians won't win, and the conservatives are unwilling and unable to check the power of the police. The Democrats distrust the police and are more willing to undermine their power and give defendents more rights.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    13. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I favor changing the system.

      Winner take all is broken. Proportional representation is the way to go. Only problem is, the one debate we're NOT allowed to have is "Are powerful political parties a good idea? Can we do something different?"

      Simply voting for some Democrat is not sufficient. I bridle at the notion that my democratic (little d) initiative can be used for nothing better than "the lesser of two evils".

      Which is why I want to go to Mars and write a new Constitution. It's a long-term strategy. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      " I favor changing the system."

      I think most people do. However the only legal way to do that is with a constitutional convention which would require 2/3 of the states to agree. This will never happen.

      The other alternative is to join a revolution and seek a violent overthrow. There are lots of militias that train for exactly this. Their likelyhood of succeding is about the same as the first option.

      In the mean time you only have two choices. Democrat or Republican. Of the two the democrats are more willing to hobble law enforcement.

      "Which is why I want to go to Mars and write a new Constitution. It's a long-term strategy. : )"

      That seems less likely then either of the two alternatives I have listed but what the hell you never know.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    15. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I understand your contention, that Democrats are more willing to hobble law enforcement than Republicans. However, they're also more willing to hobble my right to keep and bear arms, which I'm equally opposed to.

      I will not vote merely for the lesser of two evils. I will not give my imprimatur to a candidate I do not believe in.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:Wop Hoo! by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "However, they're also more willing to hobble my right to keep and bear arms, which I'm equally opposed to."

      Howard Dean is pro gun. He has a perfect rating from the NRA. Gen. Clark is also pro gun and was the supreme allied commander of NATO. John Kerry is a veteran of vietnam.

      It seems like you have nothing to worry about with the leading Democratic candidates.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    17. Re:Wop Hoo! by binarybum · · Score: 1

      your comment contradicts itself.

      --
      ôó
    18. Re:Wop Hoo! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Nuh uh.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  3. Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would make parking a lot easier if I could just drive my car into a dumpster.
    And how about clothes that last for 1 day so we can keep up with the latest trends.
    Or pets that die after a week, for when you want some love around Christmas but don't want an 8-20 year commitment.

    1. Re:Where's my disposable car by Doomrat · · Score: 1, Troll

      You can dispose of people if you chop them into bits and bury them. There's a rebate opportunity in selling the meaty parts to ethnic restaurants.

    2. Re:Where's my disposable car by rizawbone · · Score: 5, Funny
      Or pets that die after a week...

      Looks like you've never had a goldfish.

    3. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can dispose of people if you chop them into bits and bury them. There's a rebate opportunity in selling the meaty parts to ethnic restaurants.

      But as a sustained farming initiative, it's just not worth it. Let's face it... the cost of raising and feeding humans is far too prohibitive given the meager volume of meat produced. However, kidney, liver, heart, lung, etc. farming is a good growth market to pursue in the future. With the advances in the biotech sector, organ harvesting will all but guarantee you some VC startup capital.

      OTOH, should human meat prices exceed $99/pound, we just might see enough profit built in to make human meat farming sustainable over the long run. But don't farm Asians -- you want to start with Americans as you'll get the highest fat content which makes for some nice marbled cuts, not unlike a fine rib eye steak.

      And for the discerning connoisseur, human steaks go well with potatoes au gratin, a nice yorkshire pudding, and chilled glass of a 21 year old Glenfiddich. Failing the scotch, I'd recommend a 1987 Chateau De Brille. Top the dinner off with a freshly prepared creme de Brule and you'll never find a finer human meal in any restaurant.

    4. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that you have read "A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift.

      Here is a link to the story for the uneducated

    5. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...or a Hyundai or Kia

    6. Re:Where's my disposable car by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 3, Funny

      It would make parking a lot easier if I could just drive my car into a dumpster.

      You could just drive into the Bronx, like people do today, for the same effect.

      And how about clothes that last for 1 day so we can keep up with the latest trends.

      Your clothes will only last a day or so, too, in the Bronx, if you stand still long enough ... say, 45 seconds. This is why pedestrians don't stop at crosswalks if they can help it.

      Or pets that die after a week, for when you want some love around Christmas but don't want an 8-20 year commitment.

      Just get married ... it won't last more than 2 years anyway. I'm hearing the term "starter marriage" nowadays, kind of like a "starter home" except with more practicality and less morality.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    7. Re:Where's my disposable car by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      It would make parking a lot easier if I could just drive my car into a dumpster

      You can already do that. Especially if you're drunk.

    8. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "And for the discerning connoisseur, human steaks go well with potatoes au gratin..."

      I thought I'd just stop in to voice my concern about the number of false alarms to the 911 system because of accidentally bumping that big jolly button, but instead I think I'll just be in the bathroom blowing chunks for the rest of the day.

    9. Re:Where's my disposable car by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Goldfish don't die after a week, that's just the beginning of the range. 1 Week to 10+ Years. My last goldfish lived 5 years, I won him at a fair, then my little sister tipped the tank and he died.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    10. Re:Where's my disposable car by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      And how about clothes that last for 1 day so we can keep up with the latest trends.

      Geeks already have disposable clothes: they just wear the same outfit until it falls off in tatters.

      They say it cuts down on the "expenses" of showering.

    11. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Here is a link to the story for the uneducated

      I see that was written in the literary "age of commas" where having more than one period in a paragraph to save ink had not been invented yet.

    12. Re:Where's my disposable car by adarn · · Score: 1

      Have you ever been to the bronx? The world isn't as dangerous as the TV's stereotypes say.

    13. Re:Where's my disposable car by Ickster · · Score: 1

      I prefer Fava beans with a nice Chianti. {THPT THPT THPT THPT!)

      --
      --- Usually, those that believe in absolutes are ignorant, fools, or both.
    14. Re:Where's my disposable car by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      As a kid, my parents gave me a book about the mysterious future. But they'd already been reading it for ten years, so it was a bit dated by then. Anyway, it had disposable clothes - tennis skirts, shorts and tops made of paper.

      I've never seen these go live, but I can imagine what fun could be had with a court full of paper sports clothing and the waterbucket.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    15. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goldfish, if cared for, living in a good tank, and not overcrowded (1 fish = 10 gallons, no matter how small) can live 20 years or more. the world's oldest goldfish lived to be 43.

      it's always sad to see all those fish die needless deaths because people assume they just die instantly and don't care for them. yes, some might come from the store diseased and probably already dying (e.g. feeder fish), but they each have their own personalities and should be loved and cared for like any other pet.

      or, you can cut them up, slowly, from anus to mouth, rip out their guts really, really slowly, and eat the rest. they're very hardy fish, but it's still fun to watch them twitch as they die from bleeding to death or suffocation. i like to masturbate in the warm, wet entrails of hundreds of tiny goldfish, then eat my own semen in the sloppy mass of fins and scales and blood.

    16. Re:Where's my disposable car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got well over 150K miles on my Hyundai w/o any major problems. They are good cars. I can't comment on the quality of a Kia.

    17. Re:Where's my disposable car by skookum · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! It's with great pleasure that I present you with this week's Most Xenophobic Post on Slashdot Award! Rod, tell the man what's he's just won!

      That's right, Skip, the fine gentlemen will enjoy a free lifetime membership to the Republican Party! He'll need that while he's relaxing on the beaches of sunny Porta Vallarta! Of course, we'll also provide bodyguards at all times to keep all those dirty ethnics from stealing his wallet.

    18. Re:Where's my disposable car by gfim · · Score: 1

      We got three goldfish about 15 years ago. The first died after about 5 years. The second about 5 years after that. The last one is still going strong!!

      Graham

      --
      Graham
  4. Now if we could just... by Freaek · · Score: 2, Informative

    get that global communications network up & running, these things would be great.

    Going on holiday to BumFuckEgypt? No worries, buy a phone there. What, didn't use all your credit? Sweet, bring it on home and finish it there.

    Ooooh, this will be great for Shane Warne, he can SMS chicks without getting found out now :)

    1. Re:Now if we could just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going on holiday to BumFuckEgypt?
      I usually go to BumFuckSanFransisco instead

    2. Re:Now if we could just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A plain old bumfuck is a-ok... anytime, anywhere.

      Just ask prince Charles.

    3. Re:Now if we could just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI BumFuckEgypt has high speed GPRS almost a year ago, DSL three years ago, ISDN even before so we are very connected here, I'd rather call it EgyptFuckFreaek. sigh..

    4. Re:Now if we could just... by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      I have no idea who Shane Warne is, and lack the energy to ego-surf him (her?), but whoever this person is (s)he must also be a massive geek, in order to SMS without a display on the phone. Phew!

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    5. Re:Now if we could just... by sirvulcan · · Score: 1

      shane warne is a aussie cricket player who got in trouble when he sent some chicks lewd and embarrasing text messages... these chicks took it as sexual harrassment. He done this to more than one woman (link 1 - link 2)

  5. Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is great for tourists. The USA use 1900MHz for their GSM networks, so the dualband (900MHz and 1800MHz) GSM phones which are common in Europe are of no use to tourists. A disposable cell phone looks like a good way to stay in touch with home and fellow travellers.

    1. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not to mention terrorists. Like the kind that flew into the WTC.

    2. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure a terrorist is ready to pay for a normal (used) cellphone. They want to appear normal. For that and other reasons they live in the target country for months or even years before the act. A tourist on the other hand won't buy a phone which is useless after a few weeks of vacation.

    3. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't discriminate, there are lots of other terrorists who would love this. What about those South American terrorists who Schwarzenegger battled in Collateral Damage? Timothy McVeigh copycats would have a great trigger now, now without a contract to sign. Or drug dealers?

    4. Re:Great for tourists by GodEater · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most phones on sale in Europe this days are now tri-band - so they support 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz. I've personally been able to use my last three phones in both Europe and the USA without any problems...

      --

      Gentlemen, start your penguins

    5. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That is a very recent development, at least in the mainstream market. The installed base is still dominated by dualband devices.

    6. Re:Great for tourists by DrXym · · Score: 0
      Tourists can hire a phone at the airport, or buy a prepay card, or use a coin box, or use the the hotel phone, or just buy a normal prepay phone.


      Besides which, if tourists are their market, it kind of runs counter about all the bullshit about it being recyclable. How many tourists are going to get the $5 back on their phone if it means posting the thing off and getting some silly rebate cheque?

    7. Re:Great for tourists by kraut · · Score: 1

      Of course you could buy a triband phone instead.

      But I agree, this is most useful for tourists - using your GSM abroad can get pretty expensive pretty quickly. Particularly for other people calling you.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    8. Re:Great for tourists by kju · · Score: 0

      No, the aren't. Most phones today sold in europe are dualband - gsm 900 and gsm 1800. triband types are very rare and usually cost much more than the dualband ones which explains why the triband ones are not common.

    9. Re:Great for tourists by frisket · · Score: 1
      Yes, but their Web site refers to a Feb 24 episode of CSI:Miami! So these people have been around since at least the beginning of 2003? And /. has only just reported on them?

      What the fsck are these idiots doing for marketing?

      I was in the USA with my family for 2 weeks in the summer -- phoneless except for my own tri-band. Why weren't there great piles of these phones heaped up for sale at Logan, JFK, BWI, and Dulles? And in every dime store, corner convenience, and drug store from Mt Cadillac to Baja California? Price them right and make them available, and you'll have every passenger off a transatlantic flight buying one (bar the mugs like me who forked out for the tri-band). Presumably you can dial international from these gizzmos...

      America has forgotten how to sell. This does not bode well for the future.

    10. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except I'd imagine that a disposable cell phone makes use of the least expensive (and least reliable) components.

      How good could the keypad be? The sound quality?

      If you come to the states, your best bet is cellphone rental. They're pretty cheap to rent, and since they're rentals are real cell phones will real service providers, they're fairly high quality (for the states, at least).

    11. Re:Great for tourists by Detritus · · Score: 1
      Presumably you can dial international from these gizzmos...

      I wouldn't bet on it. Many US cellular carriers block international phone calls by default.

      They are also fixated on getting people to sign up for multi-year contracts.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    12. Re:Great for tourists by thynk · · Score: 1

      So these people have been around since at least the beginning of 2003?

      They have been around since 1993 if you look at their financial sheets. Total 2002 sales of $4k and debt of over 7 Million. The register ran an article on them and another company back in 01 - I hadn't discovered the wonder of slashdot back then so if it was run here I wouldn't know.

      I'm still calling vaporware until there is actually a way to buy one. My previous comment about these here

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    13. Re:Great for tourists by lga · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Most phones today sold in europe are dualband


      I sell mobile phones for a living and I have to point out that this isn't true. A year ago most phones were dual band, with maybe 5 - 10% tri band. Recently it's been more like 33% to 50% tri band. Of course now I have moved on to selling 3G phones and the US has once again chosen a completely incompatible standard...

    14. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soon quadband gsm phones will be ubiquitous (like this motorola V600) http://www.latest-mobile-phones.co.uk/motorola/mot orola-v600.htm

      pre-paid SIMs are the way to go for GSM

    15. Re:Great for tourists by Durrik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its vapourware and IMO it will never be anything but. If you look at some of the financial articles on Hop-on they come to the conclusion that Hop-on is just a way to get money from investors. They haven't produced anything and probably never will.

      They're president (Peter Michaels) had to step down because he was arrested by the SEC I believe. I don't remember exactly what happened but he was arrested because of some of the scams he was pulling.

      They work with cellphone chip set manufacturers and then screw them just before going to production and canceling the project. They had a phone get through FCC for CDMA, and they dropped it, even though the software was done for the phone and it passed the compiance testing. This was over a year ago, and they haven't produced anything but press releases. Though no-one seems to be biting they're stock since it has been ~0.10 for a year unlike SCO.

      And the slashdot story doesn't point to anywhere at all, but to the hop-on website as if it was new. Its been on slashdot so often it isn't funny anymore.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    16. Re:Great for tourists by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Killing themselves was better than anonymity to remain out of the reach of the law. Just because *you're* too scared to leave your house now, doesn't mean the rest of us should give up on life, and the future. Best regards from NYC, AC - don't bother visiting, it's much safer for you to just put all your cash in an envelope and send it here. We'll call you, I promise.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Great for tourists by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      But, these provide -total- anonymity if you use cash.

    18. Re:Great for tourists by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know about that. With all the wrong numbers I've answered on every cell phone I've ever owned, local number portability is a godsend to me. With a disposable phone you will get a recycled number, and are thus very likely to get several wrong number calls. I'm sure the terrorists would rather not get a call while building their bomb, if you get my meaning.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    19. Re:Great for tourists by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      But, these provide -total- anonymity if you use cash. As it has been pointed out above, no they don't. They can still be tracked and tapped.

      I guess you are of the opinion that pgp-signed email should not be allowed? What about chainsaws? What about cars and airplanes? They can all be used inapproriately. I guess we should ban all knives as well. Give me a break.

      Just because something CAN be used by criminals doesn't make it bad itself!

    20. Re:Great for tourists by simonpage · · Score: 1

      True to a certain extent, but most modern phones are Tri-band to cover European and American frequencies.
      What puzzles me most is that most mobiles cost 200+('bout $350) to manufacture. The networks normally give 'kick back' to mobile phone retailers, in the hope that the user decides to hold on for a couple of years. So wheres the step 3: profit?

    21. Re:Great for tourists by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Did I say that it was bad? No. I was just saying that if I was a terrorist, I would want one of these rather than a traditional prepaid phone.

    22. Re:Great for tourists by kju · · Score: 1

      Yes, and because you are of course right, 90% of the mobile phones sold by german carriers like vodafone and t-mobile are dualband ones... And all the people i know who recently got a mobile phone got a dualband, not a triband. I don't know where you are located, but in germany triband is still virtually unseen.

    23. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I can't beliee this story is on slashdot.. again..

      I worked for a company that MADE some of the Hop-On phones, and I can attest to how big of a scammer this guy really is. He's being investigated for fraud related to a series of bogus internet gambling sites (do a google search for Peter Michaels and hop-on). He's stepped down as the CEO of Hop-On, but it doesn't change the fact that it's vapour.

      As for the phones. I've extensively used the CDMA version, and I can assure you that it is NOT vapour. It works suprisingly well, and could be viable. Problem is that Hop-On will NEVER get any of these phones. They cheated the company out of approximately half a million dollars in funding, and as a result this company is now witholding the rights to the design.

      Other reasons you won't see this phone in the US:

      -There is no GSM version that I am aware of. The GSM phones that were shown to investors were just butchered Nokias that fit into the casing.

      -The CDMA version does not have the ability to report location information. It is a requirement for all new phones in the US to be able to report this info.

    24. Re:Great for tourists by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Its vapourware and IMO it will never be anything but. If you look at some of the financial articles on Hop-on they come to the conclusion that Hop-on is just a way to get money from investors. They haven't produced anything and probably never will.

      This snippet from their website (this page, specifically) would support your assertion...have a look:

      Patented Technology

      Hop-on has secured multiple disposable-cell-phone patents from the STX patent collection. These patents have an effective filing date back to December 1995, which we believe predates all other patents directed to disposable cell phone technology. These patents include very broad claims directed to a method of operating a disposable cell phone with pre-programmed minutes.The patents further strengthen our competitive advantage, barring entry into the market by other companies.

      They thought this was important enough that they made it their second bullet point. They smell like they could be another Rambus in the making, except that nobody's buying into their scheme.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    25. Re:Great for tourists by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 2, Informative

      So true.

      Just a couple of signs of a company going down:
      - pretending something is a real product, when all they have is a rendered image
      - a new years message written 13th of January still being on the front page, in November, from a guy that has now been arrested.

      I don't know what it is that the same shit keeps coming up on /. but this is just silly. There's nothing new to report, and a quick look at the home page would suggest a company that's in the shit.

      Just an other toop doop tee du-dupe.

    26. Re:Great for tourists by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Actually, I replied to the wrong post... *doh*
      I meant to reply to the guy who said:

      Not to mention terrorists. Like the kind that flew into the WTC

      Because that does make it look like they're saying "Oh the horror!"

    27. Re:Great for tourists by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      He's probably in the UK (look at his website)

    28. Re:Great for tourists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's much safer for you to just put all your cash in an envelope and send it here.

      Wow, now you can get mugged without even going to New York. Isn't the internet great!

  6. Um.. not a nice alternative.. by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These seem like a nice alternative to being locked into a lengthy contract, or for people who only need a cell phone for a short period of time.

    I'd say it sounds quite wasteful, even if the phone is recyclable.. (how many will recycle it?)

    There are alternatives to lengthy contracts, such as prepaid accounts.

    And there are alternatives for people who need a phone for a short period: Renting.

    I'll just chalk this all down as another symptom that some people can't get the idea that waste is BAD.

    1. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      >> (how many will recycle it?)

      If Hop-on takes them to be recycled, then most will. After all, anyone that uses these more than once will be wanting the $5 off.

    2. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by u01000101 · · Score: 1

      Renting brings a lot of overhead with it - it may get more expensive than the disposable solution.

      Maybe there is a niche market for the disposable phones after all.

      --
      if you use a good enough junk-filter, slashdot.org will display a single, *blank*, page
    3. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Artifex · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd say it sounds quite wasteful, even if the phone is recyclable.. (how many will recycle it?)


      I've noticed that in Oregon (where I lived last), where there's a mandatory 5 cent deposit per soda bottle or can, people are much more conscientious about returning them than here in Texas, where there is no deposit, stores won't pay you for them, and you have to go find a "can bank" or something to get paid 16 cents a pound, or whatever they give these days.

      Now apply that with cell phones. Right now, sometimes providers will give you discounts to trade in your phone, or you can give them back and they supposedly give them to needy causes (though I've heard mostly they give them to outfits that fix and clean them and then sell them to nonprofits), but if you try to show up at the local household hazardous materials reclamation center, they want to charge you to take them!

      Imagine if a $25 deposit fee was charged for each phone. Yes, you'd have more people stealing phones, probably. But you'd also have a lot more phones returned instead of winding up in landfills. You could apply a similar deposit fee to phone batteries as well, which are actually more likely to be thrown away.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    4. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Zemran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although I agree with the comment I think that it may not fit the case. Would someone that lives and stays in an area want one of these? I think that the most common customer will be the tourist/business trip. As this is a US thing (note 911 button for example and I doubt that it is on the ROW bands) there will be nowhere for the buyer to get a refund when they return. I think they will just end up in rubbish bin in Europe and Asia.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    5. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw man, i remember can banks. Covered with rusty tetanus spikes, reeking of stale beer, slowly turning aluminum cans into hordes of angry, child seeking bees. There never was a better reason for not recycling.

    6. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Ah, but unless Hop-On are complete idiots, they'll be selling these things at booths in airports...which would logically mean you would be able to turn them in for your $5 refund at the airport as well. Since most business travellers and tourists will want to keep the phone as long as possible, you can bet they'll be taking them to the airport with them.

    7. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Since most business travellers and tourists will want to keep the phone as long as possible, you can bet they'll be taking them to the airport with them.


      Exactly.

      Speaking of airport booths, I'm sure the moneychangers would love to give you $20 of your $25 back if you neglected to get rid of the phone elsewhere. Or I'm sure you could donate them by dropping them into the bag your airplane [strike]stewardess[/strike]waitperson brings around for foreign currency donations to the Red Cross/Red Crescent.

      You know it'll work itself out quite quickly.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    8. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are alternatives to lengthy contracts, such as prepaid accounts.

      And there are alternatives for people who need a phone for a short period: Renting.

      But what about those of us who need untraceable throw-away phones for conducting our illegal terrorist activities? Before we had to rely on cloned cell phones, but with this new technology we may step up to legitimacy!

      - yes, joking, not a terrorist, honest, don't even know how to fly.

    9. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by MabzKhan · · Score: 1

      I agree

    10. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you put a $25 deposit on them, you're going to have every crack-head in the city trying to steal these from people to get the refund. Just what we need, another excuse for the junkies to get violent.

    11. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I'd say it sounds quite wasteful, even if the phone is recyclable.. (how many will recycle it?)

      There are alternatives to lengthy contracts, such as prepaid accounts.

      And there are alternatives for people who need a phone for a short period: Renting.


      um no.

      First off these phones are activated and ready to go in the package. no information connecting you to the phone if you buy it with cash.

      second they are recycleable I.E. you turn it in and they refurbish it and resell it. better than the thousands of regular cellphones that go in the trash every day. I have 5 in my drawer, if the cell companies were not asshats I wouldnt need to thow away a phone,battery,charge every time I switch providers. this is BETTER than any current cellphone setup.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      I'd say it sounds quite wasteful, even if the phone is recyclable.. (how many will recycle it?)

      Unknown, but one things for sure: if you live in a community where low-income people trash-can dive for 5-cent soda cans, they will make damned sure they dive for these things.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    13. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are so correct. Waste, although convenient at times, is bad. I hate how society seems to care less and less everyday about the future state of the world. Everything is limited. Landfills will be tomorrow's (un)natural resources similar to the coal mines, oil and natural gas reserves, etc we rely on today. Mining these will be where some companies will make a lot of money down the road.

      Hey, so many seem to wonder why they should care. After all, they won't have to suffer through it. Well, because our descendents will, and we should could give a damn about them.

      -Slashdot Junky

      --
      .
      Landfill Mining Co.
      Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
    14. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just joking as well, but suppose one lived in a country where civil rights were being eroded by legislation and more and more powers were being granted to the secret police. Obviously no right thinking citizen who had nothing to hide (like you and me) would use them, but they might be appealing to paranoids holding strange beliefs about universal rights and whatnot, you know, people who aren't terrorists per se, just woefully misguided concerning the extent to which we can and must trust our benevolent government agencies.

    15. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1
      And there are alternatives for people who need a phone for a short period: Renting.


      Have you actually looked at rental rates? The phone itself is usually fairly cheap, but the service is ridiculously expensive. It's cheaper to buy one of these and pay $0.10-$0.25 per minute than it is to rent a cellphone and pay $2-$4 per minute if you plan to use the phone at all.

    16. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by IronChef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are alternatives to lengthy contracts, such as prepaid accounts.

      I believe that the prepaid options now available (in the US) all have the same fatal flaw: the minutes expire... use it or lose it!

      If I could buy a prepaid phone and stretch the minutes out over months, I would do it in a second. But as far as I know this is not possible.

      Someone please correct me if I am wrong about minutes expiring on every carrier's prepaid plan...

    17. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by jjhall · · Score: 1

      For a while I had a pre-paid cell phone for my wife with AT&T. The minutes did expire, but only after 3 months. It worked out well when she hardly used it, we would buy a $25 card and it would last the full 3 months. When she started needing it more, we went ahead and got on a regular post-paid plan. Now if they would extend the time out to a year, that is almost as good as non-expiring minutes. Well, close enough for most people anyway.

    18. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by mikeswi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. You really must wonder about those people who INSIST on having their rights respected and who hold that funny little view that "Innocent until proven guilty" should be honored. Why it's downright SEDITIOUS! Everyone knows that anyone who complains that their privacy has disappeared is just a terrorist whose evil plan has been frustrated by all the attention.

      These people really need to looosen their tin foil beanies and GET WITH THE PROGRAM! Everyone knows our overlords at Homeland Security and the DoJ respect the rights they've graciously allowed us to keep.

      Perhaps those people should be rounded up and kept somewhere for safekeeping and let us HONEST, PATRIOT ACT COMPLIANT citizens get on with our lives without worrying about such potentially dangerous persons.

      *hides his outlawed copy of the old US Constitution under the loose floorboard in the kitchen and looks around warily...*

    19. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you keep active service on TracFone (read: buy more minutes every other month) then you will not lose any previous minutes you purchased. Right now you can get a Nokia 51xx and 60 mins for $25US. If these disposable guys can beat that (assuming they get started), then it might be worth while.

    20. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 1
      "If you put a $25 deposit on them, you're going to have every crack-head in the city trying to steal these from people to get the refund. Just what we need, another excuse for the junkies to get violent."

      Not if you pay by a check mailed to a street address or a credit to a cell phone account.

      It occurs to me that tracking the use of, or tapping calls on a stolen cell phone on account of "probable cause" wouldn't be much of a stretch.
    21. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >not a terrorist, honest, don't even know how to fly.

      It's easy. You just throw yourself at the ground and miss.

    22. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I believe that the prepaid options now available (in the US) all have the same fatal flaw: the minutes expire... use it or lose it!

      But it only takes one company to change that, and everyone else will follow. That's what happened in the UK; it virtually changed overnight.

    23. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, are they still like that in the US! In New Zealand prepay minutes last for a year without having to top up. It has been that way for quite some time now (they used to last for only 3 months).

    24. Re:Um.. not a nice alternative.. by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      Tracfone now has 150 minutes for 1 year for $95 or 300 for $150

      Or, as someone else said, if you keep buying minutes, your old minutes don't expire. At the current rate of $18 for 30 minutes for 2 months, it's not that much worse then the 1 year plan.

  7. 21st Century Business Plan by BriSTO(V)L · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is how to make money today: 1. Think of current newish technology that is expensive but cool. 2. Figure that in 5 years it'll be cheap. 3. Take out patents on the *disposable* use of said tech. 4. Wait 5 years for someone elso to make it cheap. 5. Profit 6. Have fun This is probably a reasonably viable business plan - my tongue is only partly in my cheek...

    1. Re:21st Century Business Plan by mccrew · · Score: 1
      The parent has been moderated to 5 as 'Funny,' but really I think it is both insightful and informative. Having patents on the disposable aspect of the invention is really huge, regardless whether they actually produce the product or not. This potentially puts them in the position of "king maker" for this technology.

      On top of that, having a single button for automatically calling 911 may also be something that they will patent, and allow them to go around extracting a pound of flesh from all telephone manufacturers and service providers, and not just cellular telephone providers either.

      -Steve
      (who has been working with his employer's patent attorneys a lot in the last few weeks...)

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    2. Re:21st Century Business Plan by croddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and sadly...

      "Patented Technology

      Hop-on has secured multiple disposable-cell-phone patents from the STX patent collection. These patents have an effective filing date back to December 1995, which we believe predates all other patents directed to disposable cell phone technology. These patents include very broad claims directed to a method of operating a disposable cell phone with pre-programmed minutes.The patents further strengthen our competitive advantage, barring entry into the market by other companies."

    3. Re:21st Century Business Plan by Noah+Adler · · Score: 1

      Too bad you won't be able to do it. I'm patenting that method!

    4. Re:21st Century Business Plan by mcpheat · · Score: 1

      The 911 operators are going to love all the silent calls they get from peoples bags/pockets. It's a big problem in the UK and here you have to acidentally press the wrong key (9) 3 times in a row.

  8. Re:West Wing women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (b) Donna Moss. She's ditzy. I love ditzy women.

  9. Oops! by Shonufftheshogun · · Score: 5, Informative

    I could see the 911 button being a nightmare for the 911 call center; it's centered right between the "send" and the "end" button.

    1. Re:Oops! by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's a good place to put the button. The fact that it is labeled as such will mean that most people will intentionally avoid that button. One of the ways they can 'recycle' this phone is by giving them to prostitutes. No, this isn't a troll.

      Almost all major metropolitan cities in America have a program where unneeded cell phones are given to prostitutes to use in emergencies. Federal law says that all cellular phones have the ability to make an emergency call to 911 regardless of account status. I've read about cell phone recycling centers for phones in Portland, LA, Seattle and San Francisco. I'm sure there are many others out there.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've read about cell phone recycling centers for phones in Portland, LA, Seattle and San Francisco. I'm sure there are many others out there.

      it DOES NOT LOGICALLY FOLLOW THAT:
      Almost all major metropolitan cities in America have a program where unneeded cell phones are given to prostitutes to use in emergencies.
      Would you back up that claim with some other examples or a reference?

    3. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The fact that it is labeled as such will mean that most people will intentionally avoid that button.

      Yes, people will avoid the button when they've got the phone in their hand - but what about when it's sitting in their pocket? My own phone has accidentally called 999 (the number for the emergency services over here) more than once - so if it's only one button that needs to be pressed, that's going to hugely increase the number of accidental calls.

    4. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've READ about them in those cities. I heard from a school counselor about two years ago that major cities were adopting(and subsudizing) plans to give recycled cellular phones for emergency use to those who needed them most, like prostitutes. I first heard about this in an article in the local newspaper but I can't seem to find it online. Surely, there must have been some online coverage of it but I can't seem to google up the right keywords to find it. It would seem that any search with the word 'prostitute' in it will prove futile. I'm at work though, I'll try to find it when I get home.

    5. Re:Oops! by bugbread · · Score: 1

      I think the implication is pretty clear that it will be a problem with people who unintentionally hit the button. Hitting the button when trying to pick up the phone before it stops ringing, people picking up the phone in a grog when it rings in the middle of the night, and, worst of all, drunk travellers who've lost all their manual dexterity.

    6. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These phones don't ring. You can't receive calls at all.

    7. Re:Oops! by Fermier+de+Pomme+de · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless the keypad locks (and most people I know don't even use that feature on the mobiles they own), 911 operators can look forward to many calls originating from pockets, backpacks and purses.

    8. Re:Oops! by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a person who's never used a cell phone, the button between start and end would logically be a pause or a hold button. That's how it works on cassette players, VCRs, and computer mp3 players.

      Make the button a red button and put a little see-through plastic cover on it that you have to flip open to push, and people will know what it's for, and you won't get accidental activations.

    9. Re:Oops! by shepd · · Score: 1

      Of course, to the international traveller who may purchase this phone so they can use a cell phone in North America (because, of course, theirs likely won't work here), 911 means as much to them as 999 means to you.

      A picture of a police car would make a much better button that could be understood worldwide.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Oops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what keypad locks are for.

      Though on phone without display that might be bit harder because it can't hint user about how to turn it off.

    11. Re:Oops! by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Most who are financially capable of international travel also own a tv and have had a misfortune of seeing at least one bad american police series or a movie. Or something like that.

      Though not everyone will pick up such trivial knowledge, lots non-american people do know of 911.

    12. Re:Oops! by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Most phones have menu navigation buttons between start and end, this probably can't be misunderstood as such.

    13. Re:Oops! by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      If it's anything like Nokia's keypad lock, if the sequence 9-1-1 is entered while lock is on, its automatically entered onto the screen and a SND button away from dialing..

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    14. Re:Oops! by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems to me the best way of doing it would be to put two 911 buttons side by side on these "disposable" phones, so you have to press both at the same time for it to dial.

      That's a good idea, I should patent it! (lol)

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    15. Re:Oops! by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but IIRC, doesn't SCO claim to have a full set of patents on the number series "911"?

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    16. Re:Oops! by Bake · · Score: 1

      The keypad locking system on many phones is bypassed when an emergency number is being dialed.

      That is the case with my Sony Ericsson T310, and my Nokia 3310 and I'm sure is the case with many other phones.

    17. Re:Oops! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      According to the Hop-On website, the '911' button has to be pressed for 2 seconds, followed by the 'send' button. I'm thinking I cal manually dial 911+send in under two secs...

      By the way, you can get internal photos, etc here

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  10. Is it just me... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...or does that phone look a shitload better designed than most of the current overgadgety, tacky, moronic-buttoned phones that saturate the market? I swear there's a special kind of drug you must need to be on to design current phones.

    (barring the T610, which is simple and gorgeous for it)

    1. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a matter of taste, I know one or two peeps who kick with a T610 but I think their just boring but something like a nokia 8810 is phat, look all the extra accessories you can get for them more than a t610 has

    2. Re:Is it just me... by Microlith · · Score: 2

      No, that thing looks about as tacky as tacky gets.

      I, quite honestly, would not be caught dead using one of those things. They may be disposeable, but at least make them look decent (and not like fisher-price toys! Look, it's My First Cellphone!)

    3. Re:Is it just me... by sydb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it would have been OK if the logo did not look like a child's cartoon. Change that to a small, modern logo and stick it discretely to the top left of the phone. Get rid of the blue and the stupid "disposable CELL PHONE" and you have something almost ipod-ish. The keypad is fairly nicely laid out.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    4. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The T610 lacks a display which is readable when the phone is standing by. You have to press a key to activate the main display just to see if you missed calls or received a message. Also, who in their right mind makes a phone with a big display, calendar, calculator, etc. but leaves out a way to store addresses for contacts? And hey, that phone can play arbitrary sounds as ringtones, so why can't it be used as a hands-free phone (except with a headset of course)?

    5. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your miles off the mark. it looks more like a toy than a phone, and a t610 doesn't have ANY design whatsoever. Personally a nokia ngage, nokia 3650 or nokia 7650 are miles better designed

    6. Re:Is it just me... by digitalunity · · Score: 0

      Try this phone on for size. It looks sharp. Has enough features to be useful(SMS,voice dialing,infrared) but doesn't do anything that phones shouldn't be doing(like playing music). The battery lasts as much as 10 days for me(light but daily usage). It is very small and weighs only 2.9 ounces. It doesn't have gawdawful ring tones, no flashing lights, no mind-numbing blue backlights.

      It's GPRS enabled and includes a WAP browser too! I love my phone.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    7. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should take a look at something like this. Simply beautiful

    8. Re:Is it just me... by Accipiter · · Score: 1

      I've been pretty happy with my Sanyo SCP-4700. It's a little smaller than I'd prefer, but it's decent.

      I'm not a fan of the gadgety bullshit phones, so I specifically looked for one that was very basic. No "flip out" action, no color screen, no cameras. It's a good phone. Just a tad small. Although I freely admit to being a fan of large, heavy phones; I still want one of the classic Motorola "Brick" phones.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    9. Re:Is it just me... by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Depends how you define "godawful ring tones". Personally, I find old cell phone rings with their bad three part melodies to be awfully grating. Give me a decent 40 part melody full synth ring tone any day. At least it sounds like music is playing as opposed to a bootup error.

    10. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chap, I hope you're trying for "Funny" because "Informative" is right out.

    11. Re:Is it just me... by croddy · · Score: 2
      FWIW, a 40-part melody is extremely rare even in complex orchestral music, and most polyphonic ('zat the word y'r looking for?) ringtones are doing no more than 8-part polyphony.

      personally, I find all cell rings annoying, but the crappy lo-depth, lo-samplerate wavetable synths in the new flashy fones are far more annoying to me than the old single-line sawtooth licks we heard a couple of years ago.

      there's something to be said for embedding a unique 'communication' in the musical signal of a cell phone ring - it's like a bell tower ring, not a goddamned car radio. blasting some fully-orchestrated rendition of 'sunday bloody sunday' whenever a call comes in is just plain tacky compared to a little 4-tone sine ditty.

    12. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I set mine to sound like a normal phone ringing. I haven't come across one other person in the last 18 months who does this.

    13. Re:Is it just me... by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      How about one of these? Clean, elegant design, packed with very feature available. Completely in contrast to the hop-on POS, which looks like a cross between a fisher price toy and a brick.

    14. Re:Is it just me... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Nokia's are shite, both technologically and style. The only thing they have going for them is a fantastic marketing department.

  11. Disposable Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone else find this crass? It looks like the trend towards low-cost, disposable, devices for mass consumption is not going to let up anytime soon. What ever happened to the care for quality, workmanship, and longevity in products? I guess it's as they say, "they don't make 'em like they used to."

    1. Re:Disposable Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd find it crass if I believed that current expensive phones were quality, well made, with any longevity, but after contracts are up they're virtually disposable anyway. if not out of technology or battery life, then out of fashion.

    2. Re:Disposable Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I bought my Nokia 6110 in 1998 and it is still working just fine.

      It was the latest model when I bought it and the price was salty, but it has definitely paid itself back by working perfectly all those years.

    3. Re:Disposable Items by fenwyk350 · · Score: 1

      Sure we've seen this trend in most other technologies but the cellphone isn't exactly priced like a disposable computer. When we can buy a device that works like our computer for 100 bucks and then get rid of it when it is "used up" we will have certainly crossed into a totally new age.

      --
      your computer did what?
    4. Re:Disposable Items by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What about the crappy eMachines/Compaqs/whatever computers that places like Best Buy sell for something like $200 after rebates? As far as I'm concerned they are disposable - they aren't worth trying to fix, and the components are all cheap unreliable junk so they are hardly worth even parting out.

    5. Re:Disposable Items by fenwyk350 · · Score: 1

      We actually had a 50 year old customer in today with an eMachine and didn't balk at spending 40 bucks for a new power supply. Of course this guy had a metal plate in his head and lives with his sister. I am not making this up. So yeah, almost disposable but not yet.

      --
      your computer did what?
  12. 911? by clfrd · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I see lots of accidental 911 calls in the future.

    I don't really see the point of having a huge button for dialing 911.. it's really not that hard to dial, is it?

    The website doesn't say, but I'd also be interested to know if dialing 911 is still allowed after your minutes have expired.

    1. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in the GSM networks, but I guess it's the same with other systems, it is compulsory to support emmergency calls for free, even if it comes from a phone that doesn't belong to the network.

      It even works if it's a phone that does not have a SIM card in it.

    2. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9 and 1 are on the opposite corners of the dial pad. That's why it's 911, not 111 or something similarly easy to dial by accident (actually 111 was used at some point but, before tone-dialing, people frequently "dialed" 111 when they tapped the hook, so it was changed).

    3. Re:911? by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Within EU the number is 112.

      Great thinking there...

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    4. Re:911? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well in australia we have 000... often gets dialled by accident.

    5. Re:911? by Versix · · Score: 1

      I thought 112 was an international number - that is, it works no matter where you are (I know it works in Australia too). Here the emergency number is 000. This also happens to be the exact number that is dialed if I place my Nokia 3310 keypad-down on a hard surface and press the back three times... it seems that the zero is the load-bearing button.

    6. Re:911? by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 1
      The website doesn't say, but I'd also be interested to know if dialing 911 is still allowed after your minutes have expired

      Yes. In the U.S. it is madated that every cellphone be able to freely call 911, irregardless of minutes left. it works even if you dont have a service plan. well, i guess the FCC isnt pure evil...

    7. Re:911? by gibbonboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      While it is law (in the US, anyway) that all cell phones, even un-initialized handsets, must be able to access 911, these unidentifiable phones are a burden on the emergency system. Several localities have given them to the elderly and battered women, and I believe AAA will sell you a phone cheap, the only button on the phone is a big, round, "911" button. People don't realize that with Phase I and II wireless around the corner, these throw-away phones could represent a false sense of security. The wireless carriers have fought tooth and nail to avoid installing Phase II equipment, even though the per-chip cost for gps units is now under 4 dollars. At present, less than 50 911 centers in the US can handle a Phase II wireless call, more can do Phase I, which is just having a callback number. And the stupid (and I mean stupid) 911 button on these phones will mean swamping 911 centers with "butt-dialling" 911 calls, because I don't see a "keylock" button anywhere.

      --
      "Never pet a burning dog."
    8. Re:911? by numark · · Score: 1

      Any cell phone network is required to accept calls to 911 even if the phone no longer has paid service. The cell will detect the call going through and immediately route it without requiring any sort of plan, etc.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    9. Re:911? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1
      ... irregardless...

      GAH! There's no such word! The word is "regardless", not "irregardless"!

      I'm not even a native English speaker, and this annoys the fucking hell out of me.
    10. Re:911? by forged · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to have a SIM card in your cellphone to place an emergency call (I am speaking of my Nokia, maybe other brands allow it too)

    11. Re:911? by numark · · Score: 1

      Ah, I didn't know this as well, though it does make sense. Being a USA resident with a dual-band phone (CDMA and analog) I've never had the opportunity to come across a GSM phone that required SIM cards. Thanks for informing me a little bit more ;)

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    12. Re:911? by WoTG · · Score: 1

      I think the Nokia's except any of the global emergency numbers. I've dialed 08 (apparently Mexico's number) at least once - I had a personally embarassing call back from the 911 call centre... OK it wasn't that bad, but I hated the idea of tying up their phone line. The big problem to me, is it accepts the number even if the keyboard lock is on. That's ok for 911, but as you say, some of the other magic numbers are easy to trigger by accident.

    13. Re:911? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not even a native English speaker, and this annoys the fucking hell out of me.

      So I'm not an "biggoted yank" after all! You ask someone to work on their grammar and they give you "I'm not a native speaker you insensitve clod!"

  13. Is it legit? by Akai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember that Hop-On has been caught in the past passing of repackaged Nokia phones as their "disposable" solutions.

    I believe it when I see it at my local 7-11.....

    --
    Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
    1. Re:Is it legit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure you're calling 7-11 and not some other number [eg:911].

    2. Re:Is it legit? by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

      yeah no kidding...the picture on the website that shows the back side of the phone shows a "CDMA by Qualcomm" - Qualcomm this time?

  14. No product for Europe by tmk · · Score: 1

    I guess you will never be able to buy such an telephone in Europe. We hear all the time about criminals with dozens of cellphones, so that the police never can intercept their criminal talks.

    1. Re:No product for Europe by Kristoph · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No idea why you say that.

      I can walk into any phone shop in Belgium and buy a pre-paid GSM card without leaving my name. I can then use that card in any GSM phone anywhere in Europe.

      I am also aware of similar schemes in other European countries.

      The criminals already have anonymous communication methods and that it is as it should be, because it means the rest of us do too.

      Kristoph

    2. Re:No product for Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is an unecological item.
      Buy-Trash-Buy-Trash-Buy-Trash...

      This isn't a product for Europe...some thing about Kyoto.

    3. Re:No product for Europe by tmk · · Score: 1

      I agree, but the EU-legalitive has other plans. Today you can buy those GSM cards without leaving your name, but when an EU-directive becomes effective you have no choices anymore.

      Beside of that is the German police very industrious in monitoring mobile phones. With an IMSI-Catcher they monitor every mobile within hundrets of meters. With "silent SMS" they can locate every mobile...

    4. Re:No product for Europe by forged · · Score: 1
      • I guess you will never be able to buy such an telephone in Europe

      You got that right.... I can't imagine someone either that wants to buy a crappy, ugly, expensive throw-away cellphone when one can get a basic $50 cellphone and a $10 pre-paid SIM card, which perform much better (voice mail, sms) and that one owns and recharge conveniently ?!

  15. Dis pose a ble... by RLiegh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    are you serious?

  16. Pay phones by mr100percent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, I thought that the reason Pay Phones in the US can no longer receive incoming calls is because drug dealers were using them to do business.

    Wouldn't this just do the same? I can see this as a boon for an illicit dealer.

    1. Re:Pay phones by muffen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can see this as a boon for an illicit dealer.

      There was the same fear here in europe when the prepaid mobile phonecards came into use. As it turns out, they are able to track people even if they use prepaid mobile phones.
      Therefore, I don't think it'll be that bad.

      Actually, I think these things may give people a false sence of security, and it may well turn out to work against the criminals, not for them.

    2. Re:Pay phones by velo_mike · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can see this as a boon for an illicit dealer.

      If it's truly anonymous, think vending machines or straight cash sales, then you're right, illicit dealers could use them as well as the other monsters hiding under our collective bed: terrorists, child molesters, music pirates, etc.

      Is this a reason not to have such things, because they MIGHT be used to break the law? That rationale is being used by the gun ban folks, the MPAA/RIAA, and supporters of the DMCA, among others.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    3. Re:Pay phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But think of how many car accidents that would increase.

      As a separate idea, Wouldn't that also make the ghettoes worse because more drugs would lead to more crime?

    4. Re:Pay phones by SkArcher · · Score: 1

      Alcohol and cigarettes are legal, but you still get people offering black market (i.e. no tax) goods.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    5. Re:Pay phones by danimrich · · Score: 1

      European network operators require you to register before you can start placing calls with prepaid cards. I doubt that something similar could be done with disposable phones.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    6. Re:Pay phones by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      yeah, but it isn't the locating of the phone that is at issue - its who is using it.

      You see, you don't have to register under a real name or address (unlike a contract where you must have a real bank account to pay the bills from).

      There was an issue where people would buy a pre-paid phone to make nuisance calls anonymously. I don't know if the rules or checks have been tightened up since then, but I wouldn't count on it.

    7. Re:Pay phones by Fermier+de+Pomme+de · · Score: 1
      Perhaps because 'sin' taxes are so high.

      Certain legislators would like to see cigs, etc. made illegal but they can't quite do that so instead they pass tax levies that are so high that they are a blatant attempt at getting people not to purchase the products in question.

      Sometimes it is due to 'morality' and sometimes it is an attempt to be everyone's parent. In either case it is an attack on personal freedom.

      This is not the way a tax system is supposed to function. It is an abuse of power.

      We live in a world where market economies are at work. If someone will sell you an identical product for a third the price then what are you supposed to do? Be a sucker and pay 'taxes' that amount to many multiples of the production cost of the goods; all because someone is attempting to legislate morality and behaviour without having the honesty to do it directly?

      These taxes are in some sense very similar to banning the substances in question. It is no wonder that society responds similarly.

    8. Re:Pay phones by muffen · · Score: 1

      European network operators require you to register before you can start placing calls with prepaid cards.

      Not true at all. I have used prepaid mobile cards in four european countries (Sweden, Ireland, Netherlands and the UK) without registering at all. When I left the country, I threw the card in the bin, and thats that.

      If I felt like it, I could pick up a prepaid card each day without any hassle. Hence, this is exactly the same as the disposable mobile phones in regards to criminals using them.
      I have a friend who did something bad once and ended up in court. In court (this was in Sweden, and for those of you that want to know, he was using comviq prepaid mobilecards), they actually played recorded phone-conversations, and this guy was getting a new prepaid card each day or two. They even had ICQ logs as proof.

      If I was a criminal who needed to speak anonymously, I would certanly not be using prepaid mobile phones. With computers, there are many more secure ways of communicating.

      This may or may not help criminals, and I am guessing not, as any criminal with anything in his/her head, will already be using more secure communication.

      Personally, I think this is a useless invention that does more harm than good, due to the increase in dangerous waste (batteries are bad). Why can't they just rent out the phones instead??

    9. Re:Pay phones by danimrich · · Score: 1

      okay, you may be right, I never tried in the countries you mentioned, but I know for sure that its is required in Austria and possibly also in Germany and Switzerland.

      Maybe the need to register for using prepaid cards gives an indication of the extent of surveillance in a particular country. I know of encrypted e-mails and the like, but if I were a criminal, I'd fear that the amount of secure communication I send and receive would direct the attention of law enforcement agencies towards me. Steganography, however, would look quite appealing to me.

      A lot of mobile operators already rent out phones to customers who wish to use their contract when they travel to the US. However, I think that renting out phones would require a lot more logistics than the "return phone for rebate"-approach. It is just stupid to tell people they can discard the phone if they like.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    10. Re:Pay phones by isorox · · Score: 1

      Not in the UK. Buy the phone or sim, and you don't need to register. If you're really paranoid buy a second hand phone and sim through the paper.

    11. Re:Pay phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an important verdict recently that requiring cellphone network operators to register the identities of prepaid customers is unlawful in Germany. This used to be the norm here, though. In any case, prepaid cards are not as anonymous as disposable phones, simply because each GSM phone has a unique id (IMEI) which doesn't change when you use a different SIM card. The IMEI is in protected flash memory which is usually not accessible from the outside without special maintenance connectors and software (same as the the simlock, branding and other information which the customer isn't supposed to modify).

    12. Re:Pay phones by jmbauer · · Score: 1
      I can see this as a boon for an illicit dealer.

      Or a stalker, for that matter.

    13. Re:Pay phones by sydb · · Score: 1

      Bad practice to reply to my own post but I am stunned at the ignorant moderation done to my post.

      There was a subtle point in my post. It escaped certain people, obviously. The parent expressed a concern that this technology would be unsuitable for implementation due to it abetting criminals in their activities. My point is that we create such problems for ourselves by the unjudicious application of legal interference in people's personal lives.

      If we eradicate such meddling then we eradicate the side effects too, and technology can develop as it should - unfettered by irrelevant restrictions.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  17. How will "Law Enforcement" take this? by nickovs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how long it will be before one is obliged to produce ID in order to buy one of these things. Many law enforcement agencies object to cell phones that are not tied to an identifiable individual because it makes it much harder to get an order for tapping the phone.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:How will "Law Enforcement" take this? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pay phones still exist. And you aren't asked to produce an ID to buy a "real" cellphone, either. If I'm a drug dealer or terrorist, I have no problem at all with spending a $120 in cash every other month to buy a barebones cell phone and prepay a plan---and I'll buy a new phone every week during the month or two before a big "event." The fact I can do it for $40 every other month now makes little difference to my trade.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    2. Re:How will "Law Enforcement" take this? by goon+america · · Score: 1

      Answer: You don't even need a wiretap order to intercept radio signals.

    3. Re:How will "Law Enforcement" take this? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Many law enforcement agencies object to cell phones that are not tied to an identifiable individual because it makes it much harder to get an order for tapping the phone.

      Is this really a problem for them? Don't they still have the PATRIOT act in which they don't have to get a warrant as long as they make a "terrorist" claim? Shadier law enforment don't even bother, I think sometimes they justify that that such a tap would simply give leads to better evidence, that evidence (recordings) from the tap itself need not be entered.

    4. Re:How will "Law Enforcement" take this? by hughk · · Score: 1

      In many EU countries, you must produce the same kind of ID to open a bank account before you get a mobile phone even with a pre-pay card. Of couse, this makes even cheap mobiles interesting for those with bad intentions to steal so mobile theft is rampant.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  18. what's the point? by snarkh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    No contract cell service has been available for a long time now, at least in some places. You just buy minutes as needed without any monthly payment. The only investment you make is the phone itself.

    The disposable phone seems expensive (per minute) and mostly useless. The only real application I see is when you go somewhere for a short period of time and need a phone for a few weeks.

    1. Re:what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they're saying you can add minutes later. (So if you have bad credit, you constantly recycle phones, getting the $5 back, which I bet equals the discount you get for adding minutes without purchasing a new phone.)

      While I'm scared of the company's history, this really does sound great. I'm your average two-dollars-over-minimum slacker, but unlike most, I don't need a phone for penis compensation. I'd love a web-capable PDA in my pocket, but I can get one of those with 802.11 and avoid the service fees.

      Nah, I need a cellphone for one purpose: communication while traveling, mostly to handle meeting up at the 'last mile.' (So in other words, I suppose I *could* convince my friends to get amateur licenses or FRS radios, but who'd pull that off?) This use pattern only demands 30 minutes airtime at worst, in the months where I'm actually roadtripping, but now that payphones have been removed everywhere (and those remaining require an entire roll of quarters for 2 minutes of talk), it's a niche I'd buy into.

      I'd go with a conventional prepaid plan, but those 1. expire your minutes (maybe this will too), and 2. usually don't subsidize the phones. $50-$200 isn't worth the convenience of not driving around backwoods towns at 2AM looking for a payphone... but at $30 with talk time included, I'd stash one in my glove compartment.

      I do hope the company isn't as retarded as others have said. I can imagine how they expect the business model to work -- Most buyers will probably be technophobes who want a phone to stash in their car 'for emergencies' (not knowing that 'expired' phones can usually still call 911 anyway, and of course, you don't always want 911, sometimes you want AAA or a family member), so presumably they've gotten over the 'gutted Nokias' (not that a last-gen Nokia with no 'smart' features is all that expensive in parts), and found a design that might even cough a little profit at $30... ...meanwhile, I bet their contracts with the network providers bill on *minutes used.* So, like telcos do with DSL, they can oversell the capacity a bit. A lot of those 60 minute sales will be sitting (and perhaps expiring) unused, while heavy users will create profit by buying refill minutes, or if their credit sucks (or they be ghetto ballin'), constantly trading in perfectly functional/resalable phones, while paying the 'full phone' fee each time.

      Not bad; much better than the old cardboard phone/Polaroid-style-battery idea. 802.11 + VoIP could supplant it, but I don't think WiFi nets will have enough coverage for at least a year or two, and a PDA or laptop that could handle it would still be more than a $100 initial investment, require more geek skill than most of their target market has (me being a special case?), and be much more cumbersome if you want to find out if you passed the right exit while driving.

    2. Re:what's the point? by snarkh · · Score: 1


      Yes, but as I said, you should look into no monthly fee services. You buy the phone (expensive, but you get to use it for a long time!) and then just buy your minutes. No montly fee, no nothing. Extremely convenient. Although, these plans are not available everywhere, perhaps.

    3. Re:what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What country are you in? In the sense that Cingular, Verizon, TracFone, and Virgin all seem to demand a fairly hefty markup on the phones, the minutes, or both... and at best, the airtime purchased expires after 90 days. (While I sorta liked Sprint when I had a full phone, their 'prepaid' service didn't really work like a prepay, at the time.)

      A used phone for one of the less reactivation-angsty networks could be an affordable option, and one I'll probably look into when the paycheck rolls in. But at $100+ phone, then $30 every 2-3 months, that's not much better than having the ghettoest local-only $15/month plan some vendors offer.

    4. Re:what's the point? by snarkh · · Score: 1
      Right, it seems these services are not available in the US (why? no idea).

      However, in many countries in Europe they are very common.

      Rather than to introduce single-use phones it would take make a lot more sense to introduce a reasonable pay-as-you-go program. I suspect phone companies have no interest in it, since many peple will probably choose it over their overpriced monthly plans.

    5. Re:what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, again, if you actually read the article, it's just a pay-as-you-go program that works on 'trade-in' versus minute cards. And happens to produce nicely cheap phones (lowering the cost of entry) as a side effect. ;)

      Do they offer handset subsidies ("Get a phone for $/Euro 20!") for prepaid service over there?

    6. Re:what's the point? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I was just in Staples today, and there was a little kiosk with some TracPhones. There was two models, a Nokia, and something else. The phone was $50 withh a free accessorie kit. I believe it was a charger and headset. Anways there were also calling cards. Anyways, I would be strongly tempted to get something like this.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  19. Health considerations by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder what the quality control will be like on a product that's designed to be thrown away. There's been several studies detailing local microwave heating in the brain (though no-one's sure if this is a serious thing, I sort of side with the cautious on this one. What if ? ...)

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Health considerations by Threni · · Score: 1

      >I wonder what the quality control will be like on a product that's designed to be
      > thrown away. There's been several studies detailing local microwave heating in
      >the brain (though no-one's sure if this is a serious thing, I sort of side with
      >the cautious on this one. What if ? ...)

      Why would it be any different? There have been loads of studies - all inconclusive. At least, none have been able to show damage to the brain, only localised heating. I get that in bed lying next to the radiator.

    2. Re:Health considerations by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1
      Why would it be any different ?

      Well, in no particular order:
      • There is such a thing as a heat gradient. If you're lying next to a radiator, the heat source is (relatively, even if you're head is touching the radiator) far away. The body is used to dealing with heat gradients, and it takes action accordingly. Vaso-constriction and dilation is not an on-off thing.On the other hand, locally boiling individual groups of cells within an area of constructive interference as the energy reflects from the skull is a very different problem for the body to cope with, all it can really do is mop up the mess and carry on as best it can.

      • Microwave radiation at cellphone frequencies interferes with the transmission of sodium and potassium within and without the cell (several studies). The flow of K and Na through cells is crucial to their operation (read up on the 'potassium-sodium pump').

      • The Hippocampus is affected by the same radiative frequencies, with some people experiencing higher (in some cases massively) excitation levels, others lower. This seems to be an individual thing, which doesn't bode well for regulatory authorities...

      • The cost issue of a disposable phone dictates less money will be directed towards safety features, because it simply isn't there to spend. You can't employ those expensive components that work better when the cheap ones at half the price do a 95% job, not if you're aiming to throw the thing away after use!


      Note, I'm not a "tin-hat" bloke. I think the jury's out on whether they're dangerous. Sure, phones kill brain cells, but the brain renews itself just like any other tissue. Memory storage is dispersed (it's actually the pattern of pulses between cells that stores short-term memory, not a cell in its' own right, and the pattern is holographic-like - lose a little and you can reconstruct from the rest). I'm not convinced that a little extra wastage will really hurt.

      On the other hand, just like with GM crops, we'll never really know until people have been born, lived, and then died with the technology commonplace. So, I'm cautious.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    3. Re:Health considerations by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      I truly hope they include a headphone jack.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    4. Re:Health considerations by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      (reply to own post) Looks like they do include a jack as an integral part of the design. No speakers or mics on the main unit.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    5. Re:Health considerations by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      This should be better than regular cell phones as one must use a headset.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  20. Repost? Are these things EVER coming out? by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disposable Cell Phones have been on slashdot many times before, and isn't Hop-On the same company cited for repackaging $200 Nokia's and calling them "Hop-On" phones 18 months ago? I still haven't seen Hop-On phones in retail stores years after they were first announced, and I have a feeling I won't see them for many more years. Might as well start advertising disposable computers too, since I'm sure we'll see those in the next 10 years... probably before the disposable cellphone.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  21. Tracfone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bought a Tracfone from Walmart i like it because i can buy a card form walmart and go online enter a few numbers and add time to it, or buy time online...

    http://www.tracfone.com/home_page.jsp?b=n&flash= NO

  22. Finally, a solution by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now, I can make all my phone sex calls without worrying about my parents seeing the paper trail. w00t!!!

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  23. Re:Repost? Are these things EVER coming out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    imhassi writes "isn't Hop-On the same company


    They're also the same guys who did
    Free DSL not too long ago.


    Pretty cool, that internet bubble was.

  24. Re:West Wing women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As a voting liberal Democrat I don't have anything against transsexuals. She looks great - more power to her!

    It's the conservatism that makes one ugly no matter how good you look on the outside.

  25. Someone please explain this to me... by haggar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have worked and lived in several countries in Eueope, and everywhere, recycling and safe storage of old batteries was top issue. Batteries are VERY toxic.

    And now, an idea to just throw away your mobile phone? Don't these people think about the environment? Yeah, I know, there's a 5$ incentive to return them, but you know as I know, that the average northamerican user of such device will think of the return as a nuisance and will gladly renounce to the 5$ and toss the phone. Even if only 10% does this, you still end up with huge quantities of toxic materials in the environment.

    I'd like to kick the ass of the guy who launched this product.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More cliche boring slashdot radical, even violent, environmentalism.

    2. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      I can think of one way to make this business successfull:
      As one previous poster mentioned, the frequencies used in Europe with GSM are different from those in use in the US. So why not sell the disposable phones to the tourists so they can still phone, and have the phones double as SOUVENIRS ? It'll take some work on the design to make them collectibles, of course.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    3. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by ponxx · · Score: 4, Informative

      > I have worked and lived in several countries in Eueope, and everywhere, recycling and safe
      > storage of old batteries was top issue. Batteries are VERY toxic.

      You've obviously not spent much time in the UK, but I agree with regards to most other european countries...

      It's not only batteries, but also paper, plastic, glass, metal ... in many areas of germany for example each household has 3 or 4 different bins that get collected on different days/weeks.

      When I arrived in america for the first time, I bought a (glass) bottle of water at the airport, and once i had drunk it returned it to the place that had sold it to me (cafe type thing) assuming they would recycle it in some way. The woman just gave me a very strange look and dropped the bottle in the bin right in front of me...

      I have no idea of the actual environmental impact of recycling as compared to driving, air conditioning, heating insulation, toxic waste, lack of filters in power plants etc. etc. but there certainly seems to be a very different mindset about it in western europe.

      ponxx

    4. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      I do wonder that with batteries in the UK. THey always say on them to recycle them in the facilities provided. I always think "what facilities?". Things are improving, we now have roadside pickups for cans, glass, paper, textiles. Not plasic for some reason, though other areas do. Still no batteries though...

    5. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Spruitje · · Score: 2, Informative


      I have worked and lived in several countries in Eueope, and everywhere, recycling and safe storage of old batteries was top issue. Batteries are VERY toxic.


      Well, since most vendors switched from nicad rechargeable batteries to nimh it isn't such an issue anymore.
      Second, even modern alkaline batteries don't contain mercury anymore.
      And if you want to get rid of old batteries you can drop them at most shops.
      don't forget that recycling is a big market in Europe.
      There is a lot of money in recycling.

    6. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by haggar · · Score: 1

      Actually, all the phones manufactured today, for the european market, are triple-band. I am not sure they'll work with TDMA (US) but most of them do support CDMA (US). And of course, all support GSM. Looks to me that a European customer will rather bring his/her phone with him/her, and look for a prepais SIM card.

      Provided he can find one. But in the end, he/she might end up having to use a feature-poor, environment polluting displayless piece of junk.

      --
      Sigged!
    7. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by haggar · · Score: 1

      You are skewing the point I was making: batteries are the most toxic mass-market product today, and most european countries are very aware of the risks involved with chemicals in the batteries. Cadmium, used in NiCd cells (luckily, these are going out) is expecially toxic, even in traces.

      --
      Sigged!
    8. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by haggar · · Score: 1

      And if you want to get rid of old batteries you can drop them at most shop

      Yes, you can, but will you? I will, perhaps you will, but try to look past your nose: most people don't. And these phones just scream "throw me away once you used me", as that's the whole phylosophy behind them.

      --
      Sigged!
    9. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by lga · · Score: 1
      I always think "what facilities?"

      Tha facilities are there, you just aren't looking hard enough. In the UK, nearly every mobile phone shop is part of the Phonebak scheme. You can tell because they have a big green box with a recycling logo (three green arrows) on it. You can also recyle phones at charity shops, which gets them money, or at supermarkets like Tesco, who will give you 5 pounds worth of clubcard points. There is no shortage of phone and battery recycling facilities here.

      A lot of phone companies will allow you to trade-in your old phone toward the cost of a new one, and then recycle the old one.

      Personally I sell my old phones on eBay for a profit.
    10. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is a lot of money in recycling.

      Oh really? Do people come find you and pay you for your trash? Or do you mean that they'll grudgingly accept it if you go force it upon them?

      It's obviously not cheaper to recycle than it is to use new raw materials. If it were, you would see one (or both) of the following:

      • a wage-paying job at the landfill to sort your trash as it comes out of the back of the truck; mining your refuse for valuable materials.
      • corporate buyers coming to your house to buy your valuable raw materials.

      Don't worry, though; one day we will actually use up enough of the raw materials and your trash will actually be worth something.

    11. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      I was talking about US tourists in Europe, not the other way 'round...

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    12. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Seems like the way to help prevent this would be local or federal regulations requiring a $25 refundable deposit on disposable technology like this.

      Dump the phone in a bin and you're out $25. Bring it back and you get a refund.

      That would be enough to ensure that most phones are recycled properly.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    13. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't toss them in the garbage. Put them by the garbage where garbage pickers can find them easily. $5 may not be much to you, but to others that would be a really nice find.

    14. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by haggar · · Score: 1

      Yes, 25 $US is closer to a realistic figure. The problem with pollution and clean environment value, is that it has an effect on everybody and everything, and therefore it's extremely difficult to evaluate. It's more a mentality issue, actually.

      Until the clean environment is not understood as a resource, we're bound to get worse. I hope, with education, the mentality will slowly change.

      But right now, unfortunately, I can't imagine the 25 US$ thing.

      --
      Sigged!
    15. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I was aware of being able to trade in phones. And now you mention it they do indeed have boxes at branches of shops I have now seen them. I had no idea about charity shops though, nor about Tesco.

      So, the facilities are there, other than finding out some someone helpfully informing me such as yourself, where would the average person go to find out this info? I suppose asking in phone shops... do we have any general info about how to recycle stuff? In tesco frequently though and have never seen anything about them taking phones... does this apply to other batteries, btw? Which 90% of people just dump in bins.

    16. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by lga · · Score: 1

      Tesco generally have phone recycling leaflets by the till. When they started they had banners over the till as well. As for batteries, I don't think anyone would object to them being placed in a phonebak box, but I don't know about tesco and charity shops taking them.

    17. Re:Someone please explain this to me... by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Ah, amazing what you miss when you're not actively looking. I will consider this in future...

      well, not for phones, I tend to trade those in - come to think of it I should have assumed that shops would just take then back even as not part of a trade in for recycling...

  26. This seems rather unnecessary. by Colm+Buckley · · Score: 3, Informative

    Making the entire phone disposable seems to me to be rather wasteful and, well, environmentally-unfriendly. The requirement which this phone purports to address seems to me to be already catered-for by the "pay as you go" model.

    Here (Ireland), for example, you can get a decent phone (with no account) for about 100 euro, and then buy call-cards for 10, 20, 50 euro etc. worth of credit. These have a PIN which you use to top-up your account. As an alternative to the "pay monthly" type of account with invoices, it works very well; they're used particularly by teenagers etc. There's no account, nor are one's personal details given to the phone operators.

  27. Price? by Theory+of+Everything · · Score: 0

    I couldn't find the price of one of these anywhere on the website. Does anyone know how much they'll cost (including the $5 "deposit" (rebate) for something that is supposed to be disposable--a $5 bill certainly isn't disposable for most of us!)?

  28. Prepaid SIM cards by haggar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why not just use prepaid SIM cards? That's what we have here in Finland. You get a prepaid SIM card and presto, you get to talk or receive calls. Once the allocated talktime has been exceeded, you just buy a code and "recharge" the prepaid SIM card. Or just buy a new prepaid SIM. SIM cards are small and made of non-toxic material. A much better idea for the environment, and I'd say it's much nicer, as you have YOUR choice of mobile phone.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea as long as your phone supports that... I return from my Taipei/Hongkong trip last month (I am in New Zealand, btw)... I just bought a prepaid SIM at each place with zero hassle...

      However, all the places use GSM900MHz... Many phones can do dual bands; not many phones support triple band, which is necessary in US. It is the big problem for infrequent travellers.

    2. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      I have a tri-band but when we travelled to 900 Mhz countries we just bought my wife a GSM phone on eBay for $25 US. Her European GSM SIM worked like a charm.

      We still have the phone, since we plan to go back in December, but I bet I could sell the phone back for $25. Since the original shipping was about $10 that would is all the cost we incurred.

      Kristoph

      PS. Now if only we could come up with something in Japan.

    3. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Buy a tri-band phone then. Most 'business' GSM phones support tri-band so they should even work in the US.

    4. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Not everyone has a cellphone at all, let alone one that can use a SIM card. I don't have a cellphone, but I can imagine a situation in which I would find it convenient to buy one of these, use it for a short time, and then turn it in for my five bucks.

      I'd also consider buying one for the car for emergencies, but I expect that they expire after at most a few months.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by haggar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, dual band is really entry level, nowadays. In fact, I don't know of any new Nokia phone that isn't at least triple-band. GPRS is on almost all new models.

      Strike that: all new models have GPRS, too.

      --
      Sigged!
    6. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that new low-end (not to mention used!) phones cost sometimes even less than 20e?

    7. Re:Prepaid SIM cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the Freedom of the USA!

      Yes, you are fortunate enough to be in the land of Freedom. The 5 cell phone providers, in heated competition with one another, have all come to the independent conclusion that it is best to lock in their customers.

      How does this benefit the consumer? Well, first of all the cell phone companies lobby congress to pass laws making cell phone service cheaper and easier!

      Let's take some examples:

      Number portability. Most people are confused by phone number portability. AND it costs some money to administrate all those pesky phone numbers. Congress! Please stand up for freedom and prevent such nonsense!

      3rd party telephones. Most people want a new phone every couple of years - they don't need to be confused with choice. Congress! Please don't pass laws that would make it economically possible for people to use a third party cell phone without buying into a long and expensive contract! People only want new phone features with a big pricey new contract!

      Special fees. Most people want to pay more for a contract than what they signed up for. Congress! Please pass laws so that we can charge customers more than what they signed up for! And while your at it, let these fees look like government taxes! Let us call these fees "regulatory fees" and "fcc burden" fees! Customers want low price contracts, but they also want us to stay economically wealthy! Oh, and let our contracts prohibit law suits against us!

      Standardization. Most people want technology to advance. Therefore, there should be no law to help with standardization. Congress! Do let dialing strategies be standardized across the country! Congress! Don't form a US cell phone standard! Congress! Let us come up with all our our roaming rules and definitions!...

      welcome to the freedom of the USA! Please select from one of these five cellular telephone companies:

  29. 911 button by SashaM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how many non-intentional (I'd use the word accidental, but it seems inappropriate) 911 calls are going to be made with that design. It's like those stupid computer cases with the reset button sticking out from the front which you keep bumping against accidentally.

  30. Already exists by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    If you'd consider a phone that's less than $10 as "disposable" than it already exists. It's the Nokia 5160 or 5165. Quick search of ended items on ebay turns up hundreds of Nokia 5160/5165 phones that have sold in the past 2 weeks, most for less than $10, some as low as $1.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  31. loser phone by callmetheraven · · Score: 1

    High end mobile phones are status symbols- maybe this phone should be called the "loser phone" with a big red "L" printed on the back for others to see. The perfect phone for those with no money and no credit. And as usual, the poorest will pay the highest prices, prepaid minutes are always a rip-off, plus no free nights or weekends...

    --
    You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
  32. Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $30 disposable phones will be coming sooner or later.
    Hop-on hope to be the name we remember. But they
    will never be able to beat the giants of the
    industry. Much of the GSM market in Europe is
    already driven by anonymous prepaid cards so this
    is hardly a killing point. Throwing out plastic
    is no killer either, we do this all the time with
    drinks bottles. Poisonous battery waste? Well,
    "disposable" cameras seem to be manageable. So,
    the only real problem is to build this gadget for
    $30, which means a market of such scale that no
    newcomer can create it. You can already buy a
    new GSM in Europe for around $60, so within two
    years at most, a $30 phone will be reality.

    The red herring here is "disposable". No need
    for this. Make the phones dirt cheap, just
    software wrapped around a battery, use
    anonymous pre-paid accounts, sell the
    traffic at a premium, and when the phones break,
    recycle them.

    This will be a massive seller in developing
    countries (e.g. most of Africa) where repairing
    an electronic device is impossible anyhow.

    1. Re:Analysis by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In any case, huge numbers of discarded GSMs are already being sold in Africa at fairly low prices. Here in Belgium most GSM shops let you trade or abandon your old phone when you upgrade, and these phones turn up in the markets in Lagos, Kinshassa, Kigali, Entebbe and so on.
      In today's world, there is very little that is actually truly "disposable".

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    2. Re:Analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Poisonous battery waste? Well, "disposable" cameras seem to be manageable.

      That's because there's a very good incentive to take your disposable camera back to the shop - you don't get your photos otherwise. The relevant parts then either get recycled or properly disposed of. That's totally different to these phones, which will just be thrown out with all the rest of the rubbish.

  33. or a rabbit at Easter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, we've had starter marriages and prostitution for a while.

  34. Anonymous Now by oniony · · Score: 1

    A boon for organised crime. Now every terrorist can be absolutely sure they cannot be traced.

    --

    Powered by onion juice.

    1. Re:Anonymous Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the modern variation of "will someone PLEASE think of the children!"..... "this will aid the TERRORISTS!!!"

      This kind of rhetoric makes me sick.

  35. Been covered before... by muffen · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...on Slashdot

    It's actually kinda amusing reading the comments from that last article about disposable cellphones. Many people though it'd never happen, and now, here it is :)

    1. Re:Been covered before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. Let me know when you can actually buy one...

  36. Travelling by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Well this is a nice alternative to having to take my mobile with my when travelling. Just walk into an airport, send a text messages to people who need to know and just walk around. If it gets stolen, no big deal.

    Of course you would have t owrite down all your numbers in an addressbook but is that such a big deal?

    Rus

    1. Re:Travelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sending a text message might be difficult.
      Receiving one would be impossible.
      AFAICS, the thing has no screen.

  37. Doubt it would work in the US .. by shri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On my last trip over (March '03), I was suprised that the concept of a rechargable SIM had not caught on in the US. I tried hard to find them in both Seattle and San Francisco but could not..

    With the current political climate and the perception that such a phone would only be used by terrorists and drug dealers, I find it hard to belive it would catch on or would be allowed to work.

    1. Re:Doubt it would work in the US .. by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Actually, IMO, the problem in the US is that many phones do not use a SIM. Often the phones, even the GSM ones, are _locked_ into one network.

      (You have to call up and get your GSM phone "unlocked" when you want to change networks though.)

      So, on most networks, you would have to buy a dedicated "rechargable" phone. Since the networks tie you into a plan and, as part of that, they give you a discount on the phone, for most it is _much_ cheaper to simply get a regular phone with a plan.

      Kristoph

    2. Re:Doubt it would work in the US .. by Part`A · · Score: 1

      And how is that different to how it works in the rest of the world? =)

  38. Sucky! by NaveWeiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's only possible because you get charged for incoming calls - a thing that happens only in the USA. All around the rest of the world, if someone had a phone like that she would never dump it, because it could be served as another phone number (another identity!)

    And.. it's hard to believe they'll continue to live. It all looks like a fraud to me. Their site design looks quick-n-dirty, kinda like the site of Earth Station 5.

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
    1. Re:Sucky! by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a non-problem, even when you do not pay for incomming calls.

      First, on most network in Europe, when you use a pre-paid GSM SIM card, you simply cannot receive calls when your credit runs out. I hear on some networks (in Germany for example) there is grace period before this shutdown occurs.

      However, I can just keep a 1 EUR credit on my phone and it will last for about 12 months (the credit expires after that). Since the networks do not go out of business, I dare say this sort of usage must be covered by the caller to the networks satisfaction

      Kristoph

    2. Re:Sucky! by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

      Well, that's sucky as well. Only in Israel you can always receive calls, no matter what your credit is (I hope it won't change). In 2 of the 4 providers, the service includes free caller ID as well.

      --
      Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
      Nave H. Weiss
    3. Re:Sucky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's only possible because you get charged for incoming calls - a thing that happens only in the USA

      You get charged for incoming calls in China too. Even on land lines.

  39. doesn't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In Michigan, we've got a 10 cent deposit on all beverage containers. The stores have Tomra can acceptors that read and squash the cans and print out a receipt that's good at the checkout.

    People que up with a bag of empty beer cans to get their deposit back. With practice, you can get the machine to accept 6 cans a minute.

  40. good for hacking by Biogenesis · · Score: 1

    like seriously, how good would one of these be for hacking from a laptop outside? hard to trace it back. i can just imagine the ads "Disposable cell phone when combined with Intel's Centrino wireless technology..."

  41. New rule for anti-anon proponents: by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    Each post must be accompanied, at a minimum, by your:

    full name
    home address
    phone number(s)
    date and place of birth
    social security account number
    recent passport photo

    Otherwise, STFU. ("Anti-anon proponent". Hmm.)

    1. Re:New rule for anti-anon proponents: by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      Ooh, don't forget to add a fingerprint and DNA swab, we must have those on file. If you've done nothing wrong, why worry about these trivial matters.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  42. Pay as you go by Espen · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This seems to me to be no more than an incredibly stupid and environmentally wasteful way of achieving what is already done in the rest of the world with 'rechargable' pa-as-you-go phones. ie. low-end phones with SIMs carring calling credit that can be topped-up by buying phone cards in grocery stores etc. The only thing you pollute the environment with here is the piece of paper with the top up code.

    1. Re:Pay as you go by hexdcml · · Score: 3, Interesting

      not even that, since most mobile carriers - at least here in the UK are opting for the "electronic" top ups instead.
      This means, you'll have to 'register' a top up card with your phone number, so whenever you need to top up, you simply hand the cashier the top up swipe card and the money and in a short few seconds, your pre-paid account is renewed with however much you wanted.
      I believe the phone operators are offering various incenetives to get you to use the electronic top-ups. ie. small amounts of top up like 5 and 10 are only availible electronically. But yeah.. the only waste from this method, is a small till reciept proving that you purchased the credit.

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
  43. Mod parent up: "+1, Duh" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



  44. Disturbing statements about their patents by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    http://www.hop-on.com/technology.html

    "Hop-on has secured multiple disposable-cell-phone patents from the STX patent collection. These patents have an effective filing date back to December 1995, which we believe predates all other patents directed to disposable cell phone technology. These patents include very broad claims directed to a method of operating a disposable cell phone with pre-programmed minutes.The patents further strengthen our competitive advantage, barring entry into the market by other companies."

    I just hope they haven't actually patented the very concept of a disposable cell phone. The part about "very broad claims" disturbs me.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  45. Obligatory Simpson's quote by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 0

    Homer: What's the number to 911?

  46. A little late? by lotawilly · · Score: 1

    According to this article, they were supposted to hit the shelves in nov, 2001.

  47. If it happens - Car rentals will offer it by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 1

    I can think of a lot of roadside emergency kits that would add this immediately. Renting a cell with your car when traveling would probably also really take off. I hate the idea that there is so much waste. On the other hand if there were no fees until activation - gauranteed. I think there would be real uses for an emergency phone. But whats to stop this company selling a bunch of phones and then quietly folding. Could bring a new meaning to the term Folding Cell Phone. ls

  48. Get a new one everyday. by Population · · Score: 1

    They're disposable. You pick up a new one every day and the cops have to keep tracking new numbers. The more dealers that do this, the more work the cops have to do and the more work the cops have to do means less likelyhood of criminals being caught.

    1. Re:Get a new one everyday. by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      They're disposable. You pick up a new one every day and the cops have to keep tracking new numbers. The more dealers that do this, the more work the cops have to do and the more work the cops have to do means less likelyhood of criminals being caught.

      IMHO, that's more than a little unworkable as your customers would have to do the same. A dealer who can't be reached can't earn.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    2. Re:Get a new one everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And a telephone analogon to dyndns is impossible is it not? ;-)

    3. Re:Get a new one everyday. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You pick up a new one every day and the cops have to keep tracking new numbers.

      That's no how tracking works - they triangulate your position using the relative signal strengths in the cells surrounding you. They can get you within a few feet - some companies are now selling this technology to parents to keep track of children... it's that reliable.

      They can pick up the phone based on the number you dial or even key phrases said during the conversation (echelon) - the number of the phone itself is pretty irrelevant these days.

    4. Re:Get a new one everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but dyndns forwards you to the proper IP. Getting a new cell phone would in this case mean getting a new number. I don't know of a good way to forward phone numbers so frequently.

    5. Re:Get a new one everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My phone's hardly expensive, and it still has a "call divert" option. It's not so unfeasable.

    6. Re:Get a new one everyday. by bugbread · · Score: 1

      There are two issues at play here: locating illicit users, and identifying illicit users. Triangulation can be used for location (and can occassionally prove useful, such as discovering the hideout of wanted criminals, etc.). However, unless the police already know who is using the phone, they'd have to be pretty lucky to find out the user of a given phone.

      Of course, that isn't too different than the situation with public phones, either.

    7. Re:Get a new one everyday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you switch phones too, they can still easily track you.

      The IMEI number (a unique number associated with the physical cell phone device) of the phone is seen by the GSM network. This is what is used to track stolen cellphones.

  49. Hello Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been in the news before - and it turned out to be fake. The "disposable" phone innards were a (at the time epxensive) Nokia. Nowhere was their breakthrough 'paper cellphone tech' to be found. When confronted with this they guys mumbled 'early prototype'.

    There was also supposed to be hop-on.com.au at the time - a free ISP in Australia. Didn't materialize either, but had the exact same artwork - eh?

    See also http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20020329/110230.s html and http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ch ronicle/archive/2002/03/29/BU13539.DTL&type=te ch

    I just wonder - how can this item reappear on Slash? I'm sure it has been covered before...

  50. Silly! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    At least with cameras there is an incentive to bring them back -- you need to get your pictures developed! Sure, there's that $5. I doubt that's enough for most people.

    Even if they did, how many people are going to get one in the first place? You can pickup old mobile phones now for next to nothing.

    I'm in the UK tho, it might be difference over in the US. Anyone over there considering getting one? For what reason?

  51. MOD PARENT UP just a little further please by Jesrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    All we know about human behaviour, and I mean the non-rational part of us, the part which has sentiments and some morality and/or some sense of ownership or territorial defence, well this part is the one that makes us cling to everything we own, makes us attached to that old pair of shoes, makes us feel affection for that old beige box on the desktop.

    That's why we'll see more customization kits, swappable cases and GUI skins for portable phones, and disposable phones will probably fail.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  52. How is this new? by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1

    The concept of the disposable phone is hardly novel. With all the free/cheap-with-service phones that can only used with this service or that service, that's pretty much what we have already.

    1. Re:How is this new? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      ..especially since slashdot has covered the exact same story about 3 times already over the last year.

  53. eh... by mantera · · Score: 1

    i've seen this story in the media over a year ago; why is it coming on slashdot now...

  54. Just buy a new simcard by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clearly, if you use a phone often or for a long period of time, it's cheaper to go out and buy a real phone than to continue buying replacement disposable ones. The main market, therefore, seems to be travelers etc. who will only be in an area for a short while. I'm sorry, but why can't such people just buy another simcard for their existing phone? (As opposed to this crappy disposable one, which apparently can't even send text messages. What the heck is the point of a phone that can't send text messages?) Simcards cost about $6 in most countries, much cheaper than one of these things, and you get the benefit of still being able to use your own phone.

    1. Re:Just buy a new simcard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm sorry, but why can't such people just buy another
      > simcard for their existing phone?

      Because most people still don't own a cellphone?

    2. Re:Just buy a new simcard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all the people I see who berate cell phones as an intrusion of privacy, a fad, a modern piece of technology for technology's sake, I still do not know one person now in the last 3 years who doesn't carry theirs with them constantly. I'd put it under 5% who don't own a cell yet

    3. Re:Just buy a new simcard by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      > What the heck is the point of a phone that can't
      > send text messages?

      Perhaps people like me could use it. I've never sent a text message from my phone, and I suspect it'll be years before I start doing that. Don't assume everyone has the same needs you do.

      --
      [ home ]
    4. Re:Just buy a new simcard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What the heck is the point of a phone that can't send text messages?

      Talking

    5. Re:Just buy a new simcard by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      If you enjoy actual audio-based talking so much, what are you doing posting to Slashdot?

      Text in general is a much more efficient, less ambiguous, less error prone, and (IMHO) vastly superior way of communicating information.

    6. Re:Just buy a new simcard by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      Well if you still don't own a mobile phone, and suddenly decide you need one, then (unless you only use it a couple times a year) buying a real phone with a prepaid plan is cheaper than buying a new disposable every few months. Plus, with a real phone you can get nice features like text messaging, rudimentary internet access, a digital camera, increasingly amusing games, simple PIM features, etc. To me, a disposable phone is like a disposable computer; you're limiting yourself to a very minimal and locked-down version of a device whose real usefulness lies in its ability to do things it wasn't designed to do.

    7. Re:Just buy a new simcard by dirgotronix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the heck is the point of a phone that can't send text messages? I was always under the impression that phones were made to make and recieve voice calls. It's not an instant messenger/camera/pda/toaster/kitchen sink, it's a goddamn phone.

      --
      America - Home of the scapegoat, land of the Corporation
    8. Re:Just buy a new simcard by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Speaking of course from north america...

      Text messaging in other parts of the world is far more popular than voice calls. In some countries because it's free, or nearly free. Instead of paying $0.20/min, you just tap out a text message for free, or for $0.02

      In some ways, I'd prefer it to getting some of the rambling voicemessages I seem to get. Rather than getting 2 minutes of someone blathering on, send me a couple lines of text message that are clear and concise.

      Just no "l33t t3xt sp33ch" please.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:Just buy a new simcard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God! The narrowmindedness is just amazing. Why are you so hung up on the word "phone"? It's just a device with various features. Phone happens to be one, text messaging happens to be another. And for phones that support multimedia messages, a camera is a yet another convenient feature. All of those features cater for different needs.

      Voice communication is excellent for many things, but text messaging is a lot less intrusive and doesn't demand your attention immediately. And it can be used in loud areas, or in a meeting or something when you don't want to talk on the phone etc. Some examples: you're on the subway, running a bit late and just want the other person who is waiting to know that you'll be a bit late. Or your kid lets you know how the soccer game went by sending an sms with the score, which you can then read despite being at work, in a meeting, abroad, or whatever.

      Multimedia messaging is more of a luxury, for sure, but even that has many good uses. "Honey, how do you like this couch?", "Greetings from Thailand! We're having a great time!" - attached with a photo, is pretty useful and fun.

      And so what if it also has a web browser and calendar? It's just software! It doesn't make the phone any bigger, heavier or even much more expensive. Among the hundreds of millions of cell phone users in the world, there are plenty of people who find all that stuff useful.

      So don't be so hung up on a WORD ("phone"). There are many situations where integration gives benefits and "just a phone" isn't a good idea.

    10. Re:Just buy a new simcard by nmg · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that only robots were allowed to post on Slashdot.

    11. Re:Just buy a new simcard by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      1. Transfer Frequency. Not uniform everywhere (US uses different than Europe)
      2. SimLock. Only your operator's simcard allowed. Removal voids warranty.
      3. Risk. You may decide it's safer to take a disposable handy say, to carnival in Rio, than your $300 "smart phone+PDA".

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:Just buy a new simcard by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > So don't be so hung up on a WORD ("phone"). There are many situations where integration gives benefits and "just a phone" isn't a good idea.

      The original poster said "What the heck is the point of a phone that can't send text messages?" He did NOT say "What the heck is the point of a universal multi-function device, one of which is a phone, that can't send text messages?"

      A phone is made to make calls, not a fucking Yahoo! Pager. If your phone has SMS (Glorified ICQ), yay, good for you, but why complain that it isn't a feature on every phone, when obviously, the majority of people never use it.

      You talk of narrowmindedness of the term "phone" and then explain features that are, by definition, not part of a phone. You describe a cellphone/PDA.

  55. Forgetting one thing... by MadChicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To all that say "Use it until it expires, then keep it for 911" or "Get one just to kick around in an emergency kit" are forgetting about BATTERY LIFE.

    Does anyone really think you can recharge these things? Or that they have awesome shelf life? There's probably enough juice to get you through the minutes about twice (for safety) then you have to bring it in to replace the battery pack anyway.

    Just a thought.

    --
    SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Forgetting one thing... by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      DOH. "Rechargable battery and charger"

      And I *DID* RTFA. Blinded by indignation, I claim.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
  56. Hop-Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It sounds like the only thing disposable is the company.

    According to stockpatrol, the former CEO was arrested for defrauding investors.

    Their 2002 Audited Financials, shows over 98 MILLION shares and lifetime sales of just $4,283 (at an expense of $29,576). The company has moved from online gambling (1998-2000), to DSL provider (2000), to wireless phones(2001-). The audit claims: "[...] the Company has sustained operating losses and expects such losses to continue to the forseeable future. The Company has not generated any significant revenues or product sales [...]". It also mentions that the company currently has two lawsuits against it for unpaid fees.

    1. Re:Hop-Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the website, it's all about trying to impress people with money and try get them to invest. I never trust a website where most of the front page is "hey look at what other people wrote about us".

      The site doesn't tell about pricing, but it tells how you can have your logo co-branded on it. There's also investor crap.

      This thing is all about finding fools and parting them from their money.

    2. Re:Hop-Off by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      So in otherwords, they are criminals who are making disposable, traceless, cheap cell phones which will frequently be used by criminals.

      How convenient.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  57. Abusement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That wouldn't be so great, if you think a little bit longer about it. It won't be a problem to abuse the anonymity of these phones

  58. Good idea by loserone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I really can see a use for these - When i go out into town, i dont want my new nokia stolen, so i take an old housebrick-sized phone. It gives me a point of contact, with very little risk - who would want to steal it? I was actually stopped (at knife point) and mugged a few months ago - he took a 20pound note, but not my phone, (or even my student card or driving licence. It's well worth asking to keep it - worthless to the theif + would cost a lot to replace) as for dialing emergency sevices, all nokias seem to have a facility to dial 999 (i live in the UK) at least once a week without you knowing. I often wonder how much nokia costs those services - even with the keys locked, it will still dial out if it's in your pocket.

  59. Stupid by bruthasj · · Score: 2

    Just sell temporary SIM cards at 7-11 and let people figure out how to get a used cell phone for $20 bucks. That's how we do it in Taiwan. Locking into contracts for two years is for weenies. Who cares about changing your phone number every two months!

  60. It's not the phone that should be disposable by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    One more person on the bus, shouting "Hi, yeah, I'm on the bus..." into his phone just might do it. An incentive to not dispose of them in the trash might be nice, but it probably needs to be more than $5.

    I guess these phones are a good idea "for people who only need a cell phone for a short period of time". If I dispose of them and return the phone, can I get the $5?

    Of course with my luck, I'll go to Hell for it and then .. "Hi! Yeah, I'm in Hell.." for eternity. Nooooo!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:It's not the phone that should be disposable by bugbread · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry, the "hey, I'm on the bus!" phase will end as soon as everyone in the States gets over the newness of cheap, popularly available cell phones. One day it will be the equivalent of bragging to people about having a color television.

      Of course, judging from my experience in Japan, the people around cell phone users are half the problem. I've seen people give dirty looks at people talking on the cell phone in a regular voice on the train, even though there are people having much louder face-to-face conversations nearby.

      Personally I think it's just people being annoyed that they can't eavesdrop.

    2. Re:It's not the phone that should be disposable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have a circuit diagram for a gadget a fellow hacker and I designed and build a few years back. Its unpatentable, because its illegal, and very little use to most people - unless you hate listening to Mr 'Yes! Im ON THE TRAIN!' all the way to work each day.... its a wideband GHz range noise generator powered from a small 6v battery which can take out all the mobiles in a 20 meter radius. You should be able to work out how to make one.

  61. Even crappier cell phones arrive by ljavelin · · Score: 3, Funny

    North American cell phone customers were happily surprised this morning when Merison Vireless released a cell phone so shoddy and crappy that most would be happy to dispose of it.

    "I've been waiting for the shittiest cell phone I could," remarked Janice McFarley of Prescott Hills "the phone Merison sold me wasn't that great, but I was planning to keep the unit even though I could no longer afford the service. With this phone, well, it simply has no value! I'd throw it away without a second thought!".

    The new "KrapPhone", with a limited feature set and shoddy quality, is perfect for service providers that are looking to milk customers that have very little money. Robert Slaton of Merison Vireless explained to us that they could make a tidy profit on welfare mothers and the homeless.

    "We find that welfare mothers would like a cell phone, but they can't afford the $30 monthly fees. With this totally crappy phone, we can sell them service, make a tidy profit, and the destitute will be able to remain only 3 or 4 payments behind on their rent. Once they default on our charges, they can simply throw away the phone under the guise of it's crappiness.

  62. Why? by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is a symptom of a society which thinks devices with artificial lifetimes is a good thing. Think of the mountains of AOL cds, junk mail, disposable cameras, disposable print heads, disposable tapes / DVDs etc. Is it any wonder that the US & Europe consume most of the worlds resources?


    It's not like the thing even does something you can't get now. Europe (and I hope the US) sell prepay and full featured phones starting from 50 euros - not just some crappy box that doesn't even have a display. So what is the point of this? I seriously doubt that this device is that much cheaper, and considerably more restricted in features and lifetime.


    The $5 deposit is just a sop.


    It's not like phones are the best devices from an environmental point of view (think of all the needlessly different battery and adaptor types), but at least they're not meant to be tossed away after so many minutes. In fact, most shops often have trade-in schemes for old models and pass them on to charities for refurbishment for third world countries. So some good comes from them.

  63. Welcome - yet again - to the "consumers" world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is rubbish. I mean literally.

  64. The Amway of the Phone Market by supergreentriangle · · Score: 1

    Having just read their 'Sales and Distribution' section, I immediately got shivers up my spine. The type you get when you hear a knock at the front door and the salesperson starts talking about a 'dynamic company' with 'opportunities for hard working people'... The return of the trapezoid business model?

  65. Disposable does not equal cheap. by achilstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great I hope the smart states slap a hefty sales tax on these things to cover the cost of disposal say 100 dollars per unit, doesn't seem so cheap now huh? After all the company positively encourages the user to dispose these things.

    No mention of the initial up front costs of the unit.

    The call rate will certainly be higher to cover costs and make a profit, they do intend to make a profit right? Or are they hoping to pump the share price and make money by selling blocks of shares?

    No sms text, means this tech is already dead in Europe and the rest of the world.

    Anonymous mobile phone purchase is illegal in some countries, ever try buying a legal phone in France without ID?

    Just who is the target customer? Business travellers? Poor students?

    What's the point of a mobile if you can't be sure that the other party will still have the same phone number after a week? Who would you rather do business with e.g. on ebay?

    1. Re:Disposable does not equal cheap. by squarooticus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > Great I hope the smart states slap a hefty sales
      > tax on these things to cover the cost of disposal
      > say 100 dollars per unit

      Do you honestly think the disposal cost of a disposable phone is actually $100? Give me a break. F'n environmentalist whackos...

      --
      [ home ]
    2. Re:Disposable does not equal cheap. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      My god, where have you been all my life? I want to marry you.

      Seriously, your article title is very focused on the hidden problem. Disposable items are luxury items and therefore are expensive. Permanent items cost more but last so enormously longer that in the long term they are much cheaper, even considering your labor in maintaining them. And as you pointed out, who is paying for disposal? The increasing costs of pollution, waste-processing and overall site-dumping, more than show that the costs of disposable items are being socialized to everyone. Cheaper items but higher taxes ... brilliant!

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  66. MODEM hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanna see a radio MODEM hack for these things.

  67. think in terms of distribution by ubiquitin · · Score: 1

    There's a company in Nebraska that makes custom vending machines. One of the advantages of the disposable-phone approach is that you wouldn't necessarily have to negotiate contracts with a peppy salesperson. Just swipe your card, choose your model, and you're on your way. Are the phone sales jobs good for the economy? My inclination is to put those people to work designing a better vending experience.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  68. That and pre-paid SIM cards by forged · · Score: 2, Informative
    Excellent post, I will second that.

    A low-tech alternative to throw-away phones is to simply buy a pre-paid SIM card from a local operator early in your trip, and to use that to make local calls & stay in touch with the family.

    I was in India last week and the network coverage of all major operators was excellent in towns and around urban/touristic areas. The SIM card only cost me Rs.300/- ($6) and included 30 minutes of talk time to Indian phone numbers, and allowed my friends and relatives to call that number. And you don't pay huge roaming fees for receiving calls.

    1. Re:That and pre-paid SIM cards by bugbread · · Score: 1

      True, but that's only useful if your current phone uses the same band and is SIM compatible.

    2. Re:That and pre-paid SIM cards by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      So if you are in europe, you are set.

      If you are in the US, you are screwed.

    3. Re:That and pre-paid SIM cards by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yep.. or buy a triband phone.

      (they're not that uncommon anymore.. it seems the tech has advanced enough that it doesn't add too much cost, or with some models it's cheaper for the manufacturers to just develop and manufacture one phone for the world )

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:That and pre-paid SIM cards by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      The US carriers that used to use TDMA are switching over to GSM, and most of them are offering tri-band phones (not exclusively triband phones, they offer 1900 or 1900/850 (Cingular is running GSM on 850MHz believe it or not) phones too, but they are offering them.)

      Voicestream/T-Mobile has been GSM from the start. Some of Cingular's network always was GSM and they're now switching the rest of the network over to it. AT&T are also going over to GSM at a very fast rate.

      The *only* problem is that many of the GSM phones are service-provider locked, and while I know T-Mobile has had an unlocking policy (something like "we'll unlock it after a year of service", I don't know what the policies of the other carriers are. Of course, you can always bypass this by buying an unlocked phone directly, usually it's $100 or so more expensive than buying from a carrier, and I've noticed Nokia and others are more willing to sell directly than they have in the past. The only awkward bit is getting a SIM-only contract, most carriers aren't set up to sell these over the net or via retail outlets.

      As someone who went from the UK to the US about five years ago, and lived in an area without GSM service for so long, it's a very nice feeling to get it back and be able to start chosing which phone I use without having to phone up an operator and wait 24 hours. There's no way I'd use a bulky PDA phone on the other networks, but if switching to and from is a simple matter of moving the SIM from one phone to the other, suddenly it becomes a very practical option.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:That and pre-paid SIM cards by forged · · Score: 1
      Thankfully that was the case for me, since India uses GSM as standard and my phone is tri-band. I didn't expect any problems, and got none :)

      During my trips to the USA I can also roam to the GSM networks gradually being deployed there as well. Remember, GSM isn't a european standard it is used in many other regions too, with the USA having one of the worst coverage (but that too is changing)

  69. Re:Repost? Are these things EVER coming out? by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    Reading through the pages, it sounded more like a scam / rip off. It was proposed as being 'free' so long as you spent $150 on long distance. Like magazines that take a price hike to give you 'free' gifts.

  70. Suspicious company by Zouden · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought that logo looked similar. There was a company called Hop-On in Australia a few years ago that supposedly was going to offer free internet access (offset by advertising). The company disappeared before it started connecting users, AFAIK. The website (www.hopon.com.au) is dead but the internet archive has a copy. That's obviously the same logo.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:Suspicious company by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Indeed you're right - I thought I smelled a scam when I read the site earlier... (f/x: checks share price).. 10cents a share. Total value of 62,000 dollars.

      Yup. That sure sounds like a company that can afford to develop a mobile phone.

  71. how about good old fashioned... by aepervius · · Score: 1

    ... hotel phone, airport phone, trainstation phone, coin phone, or even phone shope allowing conenction all over th worled ? You might not be able to phone from grand-canyon but for a few use in a decenny it is probably cheaper.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:how about good old fashioned... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      ...Huh?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:how about good old fashioned... by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      Sure... but how do people call you? Even if you arrange to be at a certain phone at a certain time and it accepts incoming calls, there will be someone using it at the appointed time.

      Anyone that's had to share a family / dorm room / hotel phone knows what I'm talking about.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  72. Problem is with nomenclature by s20451 · · Score: 1

    The point is that they are not supposed to get tossed in the trash, but calling them "disposable" suggests that they will be.

    Why not call them "returnable cell phones" or "temporary cell phones"?

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Problem is with nomenclature by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Just like everything is homestyle, homemade and all natural.

      Rule 1 in marketing is to ploy on the F.U.D of people.

      I mean I simply must own a swifter so I can use 28 pads to clean my floor and throw more plastic [or whatever they're made of] in the trash. Then I simply must by bottled water and leave the containers all over the place.

      Not to mention bitch about gas prices while filling my 2500kg behemoth land-yacht.

      People like being able to feel empowered...e.g. "look I'm so rich I can just throw this shit out".

      Meh... maybe it's the manham canner in me or the bottle mangoo on the desk but I really think an ounce of critical thinking is what the mass really needs. Put marketing droids out of work.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Problem is with nomenclature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh... maybe it's the manham canner in me or the bottle mangoo on the desk

      HHAHAHHAHA! taht is teh funney BECAYSE YUOR HAV BEEN BEATEN BY TEH TROLLZ!!!!!!!!!11111one2

  73. tracking, but which one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes triangulation is a great method for locating a given number, but the problem with this is which number do you triangulate to?

    One wonders, if Echelon worked as advertised, would the hi-jackers of the planes on September 11, 2001 have been as succesful?

    1. Re:tracking, but which one by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      One wonders, if Echelon worked as advertised, would the hi-jackers of the planes on September 11, 2001 have been as succesful?

      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

      -Benjamin Franklin

  74. Sony Ericcson T610 by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Is very common, works fine over there and has pretty colours. But the keys are too fiddly. And the early ones had some problems I think. And their version of Q-Bert sucks. When will the One True Phone arrive?

  75. T610 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And hey, that phone can play arbitrary sounds as ringtones,

    Any sound you want, as long as it is very very quiet...

  76. Photoshoped phone by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    Its so thin and disposable it doesn't even have a third dimension!

  77. Cans? Where? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    I see glass (white/green/brown), paper (always full to overflowing, damn junkmailers) and clothes - where are the ones for aluminium cans?

    1. Re:Cans? Where? by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      Well, interestingly at the roadside I often see glass and cans, but never paper. Paper recycling facilities I only ever see at household waste disposal places, major facilities... textiles are a bit more common.

      Newspapers are picked up off the kerb outside the house though, you put them in a carrier bag. I do wonder about that though... do they recycle that carrier bag? As with cans and glass too in my area, you put them in a supplied (reusably sensibly) green box outside the house, they sort it when they come around.

  78. ?disposable? planet/population survives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could happen.

    it'll be a "tough slog" to quote sum/many of the felonious georgewellian fuddite corepirate nazi ?pr? ?firm? hypenosys scriptdead execrable puppets.

    they dumbed up that won to replace the 'misleading facts' tome they tried out on US.

    the daze of the greed/fear/ego based felonious payper liesense ?pr? ?firm? hypenosys stock markup fraud execrable, is WANing into coolapps/the abyss, at the (increasing) speed of right.

    talk about pressure? those fauxking foulcurrs on wall street of deceit/capitollist hill, are having a whoreabull time attempting to hide the news (buy use of phonIE scriptdead ?pr? ?firm? hypenosys) of their felonious payper liesense billyonerrors' latest softwar gangster hostage taking attempts, &/or the adolescent dictator megalomania of the georgewellian fuddites/walking dead perpetraitors of the greed/fear/ego based life0cide against humankind.

    there's a real risk of overheating (peacing off) the main processor. you don't want that?

    for each of the creators' innocents harmed, there is a badtoll that must/will be repaid by you/US, as the aforementioned walking dead will not be available to make reparations, when the big flash occurs.

    the lights are coming up now. consultations are in order. you know where to look/who to trust? see you there? tell 'em robbIE?

  79. 911 button !? by dackroyd · · Score: 2, Interesting


    It's already an annoying problem for the emegency services that phones dial 911 or 999 accidentally and they have to figure out whether its a real emergency and the person is unable to speak or whether the phone is unlocked in someones pocket.

    Now there's just a single freaking button to press ? - That may be a problem.

    --
    "Free software as in beer, copy protection as in racket" - Telsa Gwynne
  80. Re:irregardless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GAH! There's no such word! The word is "regardless", not "irregardless"!
    I'm not even a native English speaker,


    Welcome to English. We've been using this word since the 1920's and will continue to do so.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=irregardl ess

  81. Dunno about you, but... by Phekko · · Score: 1

    I have trouble remembering all my acquintances' telephone numbers as it is. No need for them to change numbers every day or anything, without my PDA I won't remember more than a handful of numbers.

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  82. seems to me... by s33l3t · · Score: 1

    i will be a good for people who dont want to be tracked very easily such as drug dealers or people who holding someone up for ransom. or if nothing else i bet one of those cell phones would do wonders as a wedge to balance out my kitchen table.

  83. Contract? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    It constanty surprises me how many people are stuck with this "contract" idea.

    It's a north american concept.

    In europe, most cellphones are pay as you go. Not the limited, low service, expensive pay as you go service like in the US, but universal, GSM, GRPS, voicemail, data, etc. You want a phone? pick one. You want a phone number? Pick your store, go buy a 25e card + number. No fuss, no contract no signatures, no time wasted. Pop it in your phone, you are done. Need more time? Go anywhere and get a recharge card.
    Going to France? Buddy has an extra card? (not uncommon for people to have two or three). Pop it in your phone.
    Phone got stomped on? Need to make a call? Borrow someone's phone, pop in your card in stead of theirs, it's your phone.

    The whole "contract" idea is just an unnecessary beurocratic waste.

  84. Exploding cellphones by xmple · · Score: 1

    What about nokia cellphones?
    don't you have to dispose them when they burn a hole in your pants?

    --
    Time is the only precious thing I've got left; Don't waste it
  85. terrorism by kipple · · Score: 2, Insightful

    excellent move, in such times. now terrorists won't even worry about giving their name to get a cellphone. they can buy one, call whoever they want to call, then throw the evidence away.

    this makes me think that when there's the chance to make some profit no fear-of-terrorist can stop it. it's interesting to see that this "culture of fear" only arises when profit is under threat, and is forgotten when no money can be harmed.

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    1. Re:Terrorism by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

      im sorry.
      ppl dont run a criminal background check here.
      they only run a credit check.
      once your credit doesnt match up, they will ask you to pay a deposit.
      take $800 with you to a shop, and see how easily you can get a cellphone of your choice.

      now im assuming that a credit check and a criminal background check are two different things, and they dont show up on one another.
      also realize that the terrorists who come here wouldnt have a criminal background.

      whats next? dont let ppl buy t.v's easily cos it might make it easier for a terrorist to entertain himself, and we dont wanna do that?

    2. Re:terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Everyone knows that only terrorists use products or services that provide any kind of anonymity. That's what they were designed for after all, to let Abdullah Mohammed Akhbar call Mohammed Aziz and plot their terrorist acts in privacy.

      This is news to you?

    3. Re:Terrorism by Wintensis · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to note that here in Toronto, the RCMP are already complaining about 'throw down' cell phones - like the pay-as-you-go phones - making it extremely difficult to track/find drug dealers and other criminals (although I believe the interviewee mostly stressed drug traffickers). They will just LOVE these if they hit the shelves! Or course, as other people have noted, there are perfectly legal uses for being nameless on the grid. Back to the old chestnut - do we trample on rights to gain absolute security, or do we accept some insecurity as the price of individual rights.

    4. Re:Terrorism by henryhbk · · Score: 1
      Uh, I don't get how TV's are used to conduct criminal activities... Criminals deliberately use mobile phones, as they are harder to track, and can thrown away (presently it's expensive to do so). Secure wireless communications have a high tactical value in planning and coordinating attacks (good old fashioned bank robberies through terrorist attacks) . Look at how much the militaries spend on this feature, and how much they also spend on technologies to deny it to their opponents. Knee jerk reactions, like the TV thing make little sense in this context.

      P.S. unclear why my original post got rated a troll...

  86. i can see it now... by s33l3t · · Score: 1

    instead of bums collecting cans off the side of the road, theyll be collecting cell phones. hey we might be able to see some well to do bums here soon.

  87. It IS a pain! by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Trust me, putting the 911 button like that IS a pain for 911 operators. I am one. If people would THINK before dialing 911, we wouldn't be so busy answering stupid calls. Over 40% of the calls we take are cell calls, and I'd guess that 75% of those are wasted calls. We at the 911 call center know when there is a wreck. All the phone lines start lighting up. I've even had a 911 call reporting a wreck 20 minutes after the fact. I asked the caller, isn't the police there? She said yes, but I didn't know if you knew about it. HELLO.......McFly......I'm the one who TELLS the fire/police where to go. 911 is a victim of it's own success. For 20 years, we've told people call 911 call 911. Heck, they call 911 like it was 411 now.

  88. Mexican Drug Cartels by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    or for people who only need a cell phone for a short period of time.

    Latin American drug cartels have been doing this for some time with real cell phones. Why? Because by routinely disposing of cell phones means that you are always a few steps ahead of the government (and if you have a billion dollar warchest, why not?). In fact, they represent a large bulk of the cell numbers being used.

    Since it's being done, I don't see why they can't at least make the phone more disposable.

    Oh... and this is related to an older /. story.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:Mexican Drug Cartels by madpierre · · Score: 1

      No self respecting drug dealer would want to be seen
      using a fone as tacky as this disposable one.
      Imagine the embarrasment at the local cartel get-together.

      Hey Chico love your new fone man.
      You gonna fone home to momma.
      Here's a nickle go buy yourself a decent fone man.

      --
      siggy played guitar
  89. Nothing is disposable (nmi) by chemindefer · · Score: 1

    Nothing is disposable

  90. Terrorism by henryhbk · · Score: 0, Troll
    So why is this not an aid to terrorists. In all the movies/books you note terrorists/criminals using cell phones for a brief time then throwing them away. Well, this seems to make this cheaper/easier. There should be a requirement of ID with some verifiable component. I realize it is easier, and easier to forge id, but let's not make it trivial for every common criminal to have a trace-free phone

    While I agree there is some merit to the privacy arguments, as someone who treated victims of the WTC attacks, I think a little viligance is a good thing..

  91. Pay cash by smchris · · Score: 1

    You _know_ the phones must record numbers. Why else would they want you to return them?

    Excuse me. I think I just heard a black helicopter land in the back yard.

  92. looks like vaporware by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

    I see no photographs of a real product on that site, not even a prototype. I kind of doubt that they "have arrived". Looks like vaporware to me.

    1. Re:looks like vaporware by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

      umm, that blue cardboard-like thingie must be it. :)
      it does say "disposable cell phone" on it.

    2. Re:looks like vaporware by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      That "blue card thingie" is not a photograph of a real object, it's a computer-generated illustration.

    3. Re:looks like vaporware by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

      haha, yes. but im assuming its gonna be what the real thing would look like. they wouldnt put it up otherwise (would they?)

    4. Re:looks like vaporware by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      Right. But if they had a real thing to photograph, they'd probably put a photograph there. Hence, my point: I think it's vaporware and they don't even have a prototype.

  93. Look at the 2002 financials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe before you declare this "the arrival" you should take a look at the 2002 financials. This is all total BS. Let's look at some key facts:

    1993 -- New Discoveries Publishing Corp is incorporated in Nevada

    1998 -- They acquire the rights to a Bahama's based online gaming software (read: online casino)

    1999 -- They acquire the licensing rights to actually distribute the software. The lack of regulatory approval forces them to cease operations.

    2000 -- Hey, let's get into the DSL provider market. Also, let's change our name to Hop-On Technologies.

    2001 -- OK, that didn't work, let's get into the wireless business. Oh wait, we're $12.5M in debt. The last sentence pretty much says it all: "There is no assurance that profitble operations, if ever achieved, could be sustained on a continuing basis."

    More good news:

    April 2003 -- Qualcomm terminates the license for breach of contract

    Also, they're being sued for $40,300 by some Australian company, and $244,890 by Arrow Electronics.

    Oh, almost forgot. On April 21st, 2003, the president and CEO resigned. Whoops.

    With $130,065 in cash, as of Dec 31st, 2002, these guys are definitely going to lead us into the disposable company revolution. See you in bankruptcy court!

    Nov 9th, 2003: Gaywads at Slashdot, desperate for a story, cover this without having bothered to check to see if there's any validity to it. Whoops.

    1. Re:Look at the 2002 financials by jeffmock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This thing is almost certainly a scam. The bill of materials for a GSM phone is about $40, even after you remove the display, microphone, and speaker, which these guys seem to have done from the picture.

      Someone's got to pay for this, you can do it with a subsidized contract or you can charge for the phone, and you've still got to find a way to make money.

      Something like this comes up every couple of years. No reason to expect that this one is any more credible.

      jeff

  94. I thought... by keith.bronstrup.com · · Score: 0

    I thought my Motorola C332 was disposable! I have to call up T-Mobile almost weekly for a replacement, but still I'm too cheap to buy something better.

    --
    Error 666 - SCO source has been found in your Linux kernel. Please remove it.
    Formerly kdsolutions
  95. Still prefer a regular phone by mystran · · Score: 1
    I still prefer having a regular phone (and the old one as a spare). I bet you can't take the SIM out of a disposable and replace it with someone elses temporarily because that someone else just run out of his battery..

    Ofcourse if you have a SIMLOCKed joke..

    --
    Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
  96. I wish people would think things through... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    And a telephone analogon to dyndns is impossible is it not? ;-)
    So all the police would have to do to follow your "un-followable" changes of phone is to read the number forwarding information you so courteously furnish them via this dynamic-phone-number service. Somehow I think this defeats the purpose.
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  97. Why not sample real ringing sounds? by swb · · Score: 1

    Whenever I hear a new phone ring and its got that bad sample sound of some music I always wonder why they didn't use that ability to sample actual analog bells? Phones, door bells, buzzers, and so on. It'd be better than a phone version of some gay Justin Timberlake song.

    Disclaimer: I have a 3-4 year old star tac that just makes a "normal" electronic racket when it rings, so maybe the new ones do have real bell sounds available.

    1. Re:Why not sample real ringing sounds? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      I dunno what European or American phones sound like now, but that's precisely what the newer Japanese ones do. The 40 part phones(yes, it's standardized, so there are no 38 part ringers) have vibrato and a few other effects, so they don't sound so bad. The newer ones play actual sound samples, so a lot of people use actual song snippets.

    2. Re:Why not sample real ringing sounds? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I've got a Sony Ericsson P800, and it allows you to use any WAV file as a ring tone. Very, very nice.

      The P900 is even newer (and slightly nicer), and allows you to use MP3s as ringtones.

      http://www.sonyericsson.com/P900/main.htm

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  98. Bad idea to have 911 button by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1
    There's probably going to be some protection against unintentional 911 dialing, like: hold the 911 button down for five seconds, release it and hit the Send button within the next three seconds.

    Time delay is becoming common distinction in the interface for buttons performing radical functions. To turn off the device hold the Off button down for a second or two (like in some monitors), to activate the alarm in an elevator hold the Alarm button down for 20 seconds, and so on.

    Besides, involving more than one button in the call sequence prevents accidental calls. This is why we in Norway don't have an emergency number 111, only 110, 112 and 113.

    Having said that, yes it's still a very bad idea to dedicate a separate button to an emergency number, unless it is to be dialed frequently by the user which is not the case with general population. Let me recall... I'm 29 now, and I've dialed an emergency number twice in my life. Once I called police when I was a kid; it was unnecessary as I was not in any danger, just confused by a gang of older angry kids banging on our door. Later my mother just talked to them and the issue resolved peacefully. The other call was to the ambulance; I should probably have waited a bit before placing it. When the ambulance arrived twenty minutes later, the man who hit his head falling down the stairs and lost consciousness, have already decided and walked away on his own (both times it was in Russia).

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
    1. Re:Bad idea to have 911 button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's a great idea. Hold it down for 5 seconds and then hit talk after you get shot and are bleeding. Why not just dial the number?

  99. another backward solution in the U.S by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

    "The Hop-on cell phone brings cellular phone technology to virtually everyone, regardless of age, income or credit status."

    well, the main thing there is the "income/credit status". its plain.
    while in other countries you can go into a store and get a cellphone to use with cash, or prepaid sim's, i wasnt able to do that here in the u.s.

    i was ready to pay cash, and even had a sizeable amount in my bank a/c. i even had a credit card which i primarily got to get the fone. but no. they would make a call from the shops to the telecoms, who would run a credit check, and then say "sorry".

    at&t wanted me to pay $800 for a crappy nokia. i mean`, the fuckin fone itself would only be worth $10 (maybe even less as they offer it free to anyone who has a good credit , and for some reason, wants that model).

    i cant believe that something like a cellphone, which i consider a basic necessity by now, is treated as though its like im trying to buy a fuckin house.

    as for the fones we want to choose, where are the fuckin nokia/ericsson/siemens stores out here? i didnt find any. everything offered is by the telecoms. ppl flip out over here over fones which are just lame compared to the other places.

    so, i dont think this is a bad thing - this disposable fone. only cos they have a stupid system in place here for something considered basic for any person anywhere else. the whole countrys' running on credit. messy.

    1. Re:another backward solution in the U.S by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

      and i dont like prepaid schemes. i prefer billing.

  100. How much easier does it need to be?! by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Funny
    They made '911' so it was an easy to remember, easy to dial number, yet still a bit difficult to misdial. Now they want to assign a single button to it? So someone's in the back seat of their car making out, a stray [insert appendage here] hits the '911' button, and hilarity ensues:

    *beep* <- 911 was just pressed
    Operator: "911 emergency, how can I assist you?"
    Caller: "*muffle* *muffle* mmmph *muffle*"
    Operator: "Sir...er..or madam, are you in trouble? Where can we locate you?"
    Caller: "*shuffle* *muffle* mmm *smack* *shuffle* *beep* *muffle* *beep*"
    Operator: "Hello?"
    Caller: "*beep beep beep beep beep beep...*"

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:How much easier does it need to be?! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I could see the problem here. My Motorola C331t phone has my friends numbers programmed into 1 touch dialing. I'll get calls from people saying I called them but all they heard was rustling sounds and background noise. (From me dropping it into my pocket without locking it)

  101. Big *WOW* by madpierre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    More toxic waste for our rapidly spreading landfills.
    Just what we've all been crying out for.
    I for one welcome our new purveyors of low quality shite overlords.

    --
    siggy played guitar
  102. Re:Repost? Are these things EVER coming out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might as well start advertising disposable computers too,

    Hewlett Packard has been making those for decades.

    HP home computers... the only PC lower in quality than a gateway.

  103. Another use by a10t2 · · Score: 1
    These seem like a nice alternative to being locked into a lengthy contract, or for people who only need a cell phone for a short period of time.
    ...or for criminals.

    Seriously, these are already giving the FBI all kinds of problems. Big Brother never could keep up with technology.
    1. Re:Another use by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

      seriously, i doubt its the criminals who have a hard time getting a cellfone. its really the common man who comes here on a visit, or a student like me, who have a tough time.
      and anyway, they dont run a criminal background check on ya, just a credit check. i coulda paid at&t $800 bucks as deposit, and i coulda gotten a cellfone when i wanted, the moment i got here.
      im sure $800 isnt much for criminals.

  104. plastic is not recyclable by r5t8i6y3 · · Score: 1

    please spend some time reading about plastic before you respond to this post:

    Plastic
    http://www.mindfully.org/Plastic/plastic.htm

  105. Yay! by dagbrown · · Score: 1

    It's that time of the year again--time for Slashdot to be taken in by the Hop-On "disposable cell phone" scam!

    You'd think that after, what, five or six times now, the editors would've figured it out by now, wouldn't you? Or am I being excessively optimistic?

  106. Old idea by lowrumble · · Score: 1

    So whatever happened to the phone-card phone discussed here?

  107. Dream on by jyoull · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go ahead, try to buy one! You can't. Offer them some investment money... they'll take it!

    Did nobody notice that all images of the "phone" are virtual mockups?

    How many promos/how much hype for this have I seen in the past three years?

    Hmm, BusinessWeek mag was persuadade that they were available back in 1999 and claimed to have tested one.

    It was later shown (by opening the case) that Hop-On's "disposable phones" were really Nokia phones with their own plastic casing put around them. ... and costing WAY more than $30 for the parts.

    There were some delays admitted-to long after the 1999 "demo", in June 2002

    There was a bit of a problem with a Universal Studios tie-in back in 2001:
    "In November 2001, Hop-On announced that it would partner with Universal Studios Home Video to give away a limited number of the disposable phone to purchasers of the "Jurassic Park III" DVD/ home video. The "winners" would get a free Hop-On phone if their copy of the video contained a special coupon. The promotion was cancelled when Hop-On failed to deliver the phones... Universal has advised Stock Patrol that it is sending all of those winners - about 1000 in all - $30 checks (the supposed cost of a Hop-On phone) and a free DVD. "

    See also http://www.wirelessreview.com/ar/wireless_cutting_ room_floor_2/

    and oh, oopsie!!!!
    Disposable Cell Phone Company Hop-On Wireless CEO Indicted For Fraud (April 18, 2003 -- for ANOTHER venture of his, not Hop On, but it looks like a familiar tale)

    Last year we had the story of how it looked like disposable cell phone company Hop-On Wireless was a scam. Since then, I've seen the company highly touted in many news stories, talking about how it was this great invention... but which no one seemed to be selling. Now, the CEO of Hop-On has been arrested for fraud, relating to work he did on an earlier company - but which brings up many parallels to Hop-On. The earlier company was an online gambling site, which he raised a lot of money for. However, they did so by showing software that was really someone else's software "cosmetically altered" to look like their own. Hop-On's "disposable phones" were really Nokia phones with their own plastic casing put around them.

    From the hop-on website:
    Q. When will I be able to buy the Hop-on phone?
    A. The release date of our Hop-on phone is contingent on a variety of factors. We are doing everything we can to get our phones into the hands of all those who want and need them as soon as possible. If you like, you can e-mail us your contact information, and we'll let you know as soon as our phone is available in your area.

  108. $40 for 1 hour talk time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    $40 dollars is alot for a throw-away phone that only allows you to talk for one hour.

  109. Uh Oh... by TygerFish · · Score: 1

    WIth rental cell phones already providing absolutely untraceable service for obscene callers, this new and useful technology should and without a doubt will open up a new world of possibilities to them.

    Whee!

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
  110. You mean we are exporting our toxic waste? by alakon · · Score: 1

    Yes, and then what happens when the old phones die? They end up as toxic waste in a third world country. That reallys gives me a warm feeling inside -- to know that nothing is "disposable." At least here we have some disposal regulations!

  111. "Only In America" by Tim+Ward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just don't get the environmental bit, do they, these Americans?

    Not if they can make money by deliberate waste, anyway; that's obviously a much more important contribution to the American Way.

  112. I'll believe it when I see it by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 1

    Are these things for sale anywhere? The manufacturer's web site didn't have any prices, so I froogled for a vendor. I didn't find any live links to people selling them. However, I did find an article that suspects that Hop On Phones is marketing a non-existant product. They also give the disposable cell phone market a poor prognosis.

    --
    I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
  113. Great... by WookieinHeat · · Score: 0

    "Patented Technology

    Hop-on has secured multiple disposable-cell-phone patents from the STX patent collection. These patents have an effective filing date back to December 1995, which we believe predates all other patents directed to disposable cell phone technology. These patents include very broad claims directed to a method of operating a disposable cell phone with pre-programmed minutes. The patents further strengthen our competitive advantage, barring entry into the market by other companies."


    Just what we need, another monopoly ;-P

  114. Slashdot *has* reported on them by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So these people have been around since at least the beginning of 2003? And /. has only just reported on them?

    I suppose this is the inverse of one of those "repeat story!" posts--a story that's been covered on Slashdot at least twice already and nobody remembers. There's this 1999 story on the patent being issued, and then this one from 2002 about reviewers discovering sample Hop-On disposable phones actually had the guts of a more expensive Nokia model in them because they hadn't actually tooled up their assembly lines yet.

    So yes, they have been around a while...and yes, Slashdot's covered it.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  115. How much are they going to cost? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find any price points listed on that website...it'd be nice to know just how much one would be paying for the convenience of no contract.

    (I'm a bit doubtful about the usefulness of that 911 button. It looks like it would be easy for it to get pressed by accident. If I were the cellphone designers, I'd make it have to be held down for a couple of seconds, at least.)

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  116. I'd like a completely anonymous phone by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Now on one hand, I've been nothing but happy with Sprint PCS for years and years. The bills are fairly high, but I really like the service. On the other hand, I was looking for a cell phone, any kind of phone, for a friend. What my friend wanted was a phone with no monthly payment. On investigation, it turns out that none of the carriers offer any such thing. They ALL have a recurring monthly fee, even the ones where you supposedly "just pay in advance for airtime."

    I would go a step further, and ask for a totally anonymous cell phone. They don't need billing information if I pay cash up front for my usage, right? But none of the carriers get that far, because they don't even get to "no monthly fee, no longterm (or even short term) agreements."

    I thought that Cricket was like that. I mean the sell them at gas stations, I just figured we'd gotten to the point where the cell phone was such a commodity that I could get what I describe. A monthly fee, whether you use the phone or not, is unacceptable.

    There was one company, I think it was Alltel, who got all the way through the pitch, and answered all the questions about "you just pay for calls ahead of time, and use what you've paid for"... And it wasn't until the contract came out that I saw the truth -- you pay $25.00 a month, plus whatever airtime you pay for. Well, fu-huck that,
    it's not what my friend was looking for at all.

    The experience of shopping for a phone for my friend, and even having some of the dealers lie to us, just assures that I'll stay with SprintPCS.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:I'd like a completely anonymous phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.tracfone.com

      There is no monthly fee but you have to buy airtime cards that expire in 60 days or you can buy a year of service for more cash. It works quite well.

  117. The phone is not the issue. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    The contract and the monthly payment is the problem.

    All the phone sales are geared to an "almost free" phone with the service becoming the actual product. I think the "almost free" phone might actually be a better strategy than the "free" phone, but let's not get into that.

    The problem is, you cannot simply buy a phone (even at top dollar retail price, let's say), and then get prepaid service, and have that be the end of it. You have to sign a contract with ALL of the providers and they ALL have a monthly fee (at least $25!) on top of your prepaid airtime.

    The "disposable" aspect of the hop-on isn't really the surprising part. What surprises me is the anonymous, pre-paid, no-monthly fee claims.

    I'd like to get that deal, and I'd be happy to buy a regular Nokia or whatever.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  118. Yeah, it's a scam by Animats · · Score: 1
    "Hop-On" has been hyping this for several years now. They've been wiped out by declining cell phone prices. Their plan was to charge huge per-minute rates ($0.25/minute was mentioned). But there's no reason for anybody to buy their crappy little box - you can get cheap prepaid cell phones from real companies at any 7-11. And yes, the prototype had a Nokia inside.

    They don't even talk much about selling phones any more. They now sell "jeweled headsets" for other cell phones.

    Stock price (HPON.PK): $0.10, down from an all time high of around $0.95.

  119. Mandatory deposit recycling schemes by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    In Wisconsin we don't have a mandatory deposit per bottle/can, but everyone still recycles. It's really simple. All of the inconvenient things like taking leaking bags full of smelly cans to the dirty "can bank" are taken away by the government. Every home has a city owned "recycle bin" that is either a small garbage can, or in some cases, a regular garbage can that's a different color. They usually instruct you to put all of your recycleables in there such as paper/cardboard, glass, certain plastics, and aluminum. You put it out with your regular garbage and they take it away. It's so simple and effective that I don't know anyone that doesn't recycle here.

    We have recycle bins in public, on school campuses, everywhere. It is not unusual to see a garbage can and a recycling-specific garbage can next to each other.

    Now I've also lived in Michigan where they charge and extra 10 cents per can/bottle! Now only is that extremely annoying when you're paying for it, but you have to lug all your *uncrushed* cans to the the store in leaky bags, and watch them feed EACH can into the huge machine, one-by-one, to get your money back. And they only will accept approved brands. So you take all your cans there, then they give you back the ones that they won't accept. And you know what you do with those? Throw them in the trash! What a bass ackwards system that is.

    1. Re:Mandatory deposit recycling schemes by Artifex · · Score: 1

      When I lived in an apartment in Portland, we had specific bins for a while, and they were definitely used by people. So I know how it feels to have it available.

      We supposedly have curbside recycling here, but in the past we've gotten new reports about all our nicely sorted castoffs winding up in landfills anyway because of market oversupply. And if you live something other than an apartment or condo, you can only set stuff out once a week, and put them in plastic bags, not nice neat bins or anything. And if it rains on your bags of paper that day, you've wasted your time. And every neighborhood has different days, and so forth, so it's really a pain. So most of us continue to throw almost everything away.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    2. Re:Mandatory deposit recycling schemes by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      I can't comment on stuff ending up in landfills... I do know that we have recycling centers, but that's all I know about that.

      And if you live something other than an apartment or condo, you can only set stuff out once a week.
      And every neighborhood has different days, and so forth, so it's really a pain.


      Isn't this the same way it works with regular garbage? Why should this be any different? We put out our garbage + recyling bin all at once. This doesn't add any difficulty at all.

      and put them in plastic bags, not nice neat bins or anything.

      By this do you mean that they don't provide bins or they don't allow them? Because if it's just that they don't provide them, it's easily solved. Do they provide garbage cans? Ideally, they should provide recycling bins as well. Maybe Wisconsin just has more environmentalists pushing this stuff through? I don't know, but it does work and it really is as commonly done as taking out regular garbage. People don't even think about it anymore, they just do it. On the other hand I would rather throw out everything than deal with Michigan's flawed system.

    3. Re:Mandatory deposit recycling schemes by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Isn't this the same way it works with regular garbage? Why should this be any different? We put out our garbage + recyling bin all at once. This doesn't add any difficulty at all.


      No, we here in the big city actually get two trash pickups a week. :)

      By this do you mean that they don't provide bins or they don't allow them? Because if it's just that they don't provide them, it's easily solved. Do they provide garbage cans? Ideally, they should provide recycling bins as well.


      They don't provide them, and they apparently won't pick up from them. In our neighborhood, at least, you have to put the recyclables in a bag on the ground next to the big trash can. And if you leave them out the night before, neighborhood critters (not excluding adolescent bipedals) will strew them about your yard. Some neighborhoods do have recycle bins that are provided/sold to the residents, but not us. Like I was saying, it's very patchwork.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    4. Re:Mandatory deposit recycling schemes by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Well that's not gonna work at all. LOL! To me that looks like they hardly even made an effort. There's no way I could have put a simple bag on the ground in the alley at my old house in Milwaukee. The raccoons get into the full size cans, so a bag on the ground would just be asking for it.

  120. Pay Phones Not Recieving Calls?! by avayre · · Score: 1

    How the hell will we get out of the matrix now?!

  121. Nontoxic!? by shumacher · · Score: 1
    Or just buy a new prepaid SIM. SIM cards are small and made of non-toxic material.

    Mmmmm... SIM cards taste like chicken.

  122. That was my first thought looking at their website by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 1

    When your main webpage consists of, on the left, a gif of your product that looks like someone drew in photoshop, and on the right a list of press releases, and on the top your sticker symbol, I have to wonder if you really have a product to sell. Or if you are just running a pump and dump.

    The CSI clip is kind of funny too... it's a bad sign when you are so desperate for publicity that you see your product being used to commit a crime in a TV show as good publicity.

  123. please mod parent up by js7a · · Score: 1

    n/t

  124. echelon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, I don't advocate it at all. Just that the great-grandparent mentioned it as an "effective" device for tracking. Didn't seem to be that effective is all I'm saying.

    1. Re:echelon by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      I would agree. I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone bring this point up before...

  125. Disposable phones and rebates by andy+landy · · Score: 1

    In the UK, we've practically already got that. If your mobile phone is more than 6-9 months old, you'll get scoffed at for "having a brick" by all the 9-year-old kids who have newer and trendier phones than you.

    In an attempt to convince people to switch to a new tariff, you see up to 50 (~$80) rebate being offered for your old handset when you upgrade.

    My phone is 3 years old now, but there's nothing wrong with it, but in today's mobile phone world, that's ancient!

    --
    perl -e 'print "Just another Perl newbie\n";'
    1. Re:Disposable phones and rebates by MrTangent · · Score: 1

      "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

      --

      Personally I don't like the idea of disposable cell phones. Imagine the unprecedented amount of waste this will provide for land fills. We humans already create an enormous amount of trash (a lot of which is not biodegradable and even toxic), so I'd have to say this is a horrible idea. It's almost on par with Disney's recent disposable DVDs that begin to corrode after 48 hours (link and link).

    2. Re:Disposable phones and rebates by binarybum · · Score: 1

      unprecedented amount of waste?

      hit the books greenie -- what about the plastic milk jug just to name one.

      This is hardly going to rank among serious landfill tragedies.

      approximately 8-12h after I've eaten 3 meals at fast food chains while on the road -- now that's an unprecedented amount of waste.

      --
      ôó
  126. Good for criminals.. by pstreck · · Score: 1

    Talk your about your dirty work and get rid of the traceable element. Sounds like we just made crime easier.

    --

    Later,
    Phil
  127. Email by jefu · · Score: 1

    Perhaps these nice people would be interested in getting added to the email lists of (for instance) that poor man in Nigeria. Or maybe they need more Viagra or a Larger Male Personal Copulatory Device.

  128. 911 by morning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The 911 dispatch absolutely hates it when people have preprogrammed 911 buttons on cell phones, as the picture shows for this one. They get way too many accidental calls, and are required to try and folow up on any call made, thus wasting a significant amount of time.

  129. I think the Brothers have prior art on this one... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I remember Trinity dropping her phone in the trash after arranging an "exit".

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  130. Finally by RattRigg · · Score: 1

    Ive been wating for a phone like this forever.
    I dont want a phone that takes pictures manages my phone book, maintains a calander, plays games, plays music, has fancy ring tones and costs $150.00 (or more). I want a phone that makes calls and rings when it gets calls - thats it.

    --
    I started with nothing and I still have most of it.
  131. wow.. by jason.mitchell · · Score: 1

    That thing is fucking ugly.. I would never use a square purple phone.. next stupid idea..

  132. Re:West Wing women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arrrrrgghhhhhh..... My eyes! That chick has a bigger dick than I do!!

  133. what about the part they fight over? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    wasn't there a war in africa over an essentail part required to build a mobile phone??

  134. Prior art by xixax · · Score: 1

    I've been losing cell phones for years!

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  135. Great for terrorists by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    More like great for terrorists. Lets see.... I just need two of these phones. One wired up to a bomb. Then with the other, I can call the other phone to trigger the bomb to go off. All while remaining anonymous. Yes, I have a sick mind. But, you have to think like a terrorist if you want to prevents such a scenario from happening.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Great for terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can't do this with regular cell phones? Or a landline phone and a pager?

      As for the anonymous part that's easy when you have the money just pay some crackhead $100 to buy a cellphone for you or steal some geeks cell phone or pager when they are screwing with their pocket protector.

    2. Re:Great for terrorists by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You can do it with the devices you mentioned. But, the idea would be to have a low profile and not expose yourself to any acts of crime before hand... such as theft. Any evil mastermind will tell you not to leave a trail of bread crumbs back to yourself.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  136. We're A Monopoly, Plan to stay one, And are proud! by Rolan · · Score: 1

    Gee...

    "Hop-on has secured multiple disposable-cell-phone patents from the STX patent collection. These patents have an effective filing date back to December 1995, which we believe predates all other patents directed to disposable cell phone technology. These patents include very broad claims directed to a method of operating a disposable cell phone with pre-programmed minutes.The patents further strengthen our competitive advantage, barring entry into the market by other companies." From: http://www.hop-on.com/technology.html

    Everyone's favorite use of a patent!

    --
    - AMW
  137. How do we know they are cheap if no one has one? by geoswan · · Score: 1
    I'm still calling vaporware until there is actually a way to buy one.

    What I found interesting is how many slashdot readers commented on how great affordable disposable phones are -- but no one has said what they cost.

    Vaporware? Well, that would explain why no one know how much they cost. Lol. Heck, if each one comes with a headset how disposable can they be? Cell phone headsets aren't cheap.

  138. International Attendance at DefCon by rimhoffd · · Score: 1

    This is interesting because there was alot of hoopla about people wanting tempory phones to use durning DefCon 11, the international attendee's got cell phone bill sticker shock when they returned to their respective countries (mostly Canadain that I know of). Now you can be anonymous, and still not miss a great PoolCon party!

  139. This is nothing new. by lord_nightrose · · Score: 0

    Compare to TracFones, which have been out for a long time now. You can buy them pretty much anywhere, and they have a certain amount of prepaid call time alotted to them before they are deactivated. "Disposable Cell Phones Arrive" would be more accurately stated as "New Disposable Cell Phones Arrive."

    --
    This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
  140. One step closer to Gibson by Planx_Constant · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is a cardboard box in a Tokyo subway station and some VR goggles and I'll be set.

    --
    Heisenberg might have been here.
  141. Re. Where's my disposable car by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    Oh, no you don't. Not so fast, pal. I wan't may FLYING car first. When I was kid they said we'd all be driving flying cars by now.

    If they can make a throw-away telephones, they can make flying cars.

  142. Charging for incoming calls by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    Really?
    Now that's evil.

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
  143. Looked sleazy and deceptive to me... by instarx · · Score: 1

    Interesting post about the history of this company and its CEO. When I looked at the site the first thing that came to my mind was that it was deceptive. "Recyclable" it claims in big letters - well of course it is, just like every other cell phone, telephone, radio, and automobile is mostly recyclable in theory. The problem is that it won't be. The recycling logo (the chasing arrows printed on the back) is being misused. It is not legal to use it for a mixed product such as this and it is also illegal for them to claim recyclability for a product that, although technically able to be recycled, is unlikely to be.

    Here is a small excerpt from the Federal regulations regarding inapropriate claims of recylability (19 CFR 260 for those who want to read the whole thing):

    Example 2: A trash bag is labeled ??recyclable??
    without qualification. Because trash
    bags will ordinarily not be separated out
    from other trash at the landfill or incinerator
    for recycling, they are highly unlikely
    to be used again for any purpose. Even if the
    bag is technically capable of being recycled,
    the claim is deceptive


    There are also regulations in 29 CFR 260 prohibiting the claim of recyclability if there are non-minor unrecyclable components of the product, which this phone has. This means that even if this phone is brought back for the $5 rebate it STILL won't be recycled and therefore CANNOT be marketed as such.

    The millions of cell phones that are simply thrown into the trash today are becoming a big environmental concern. This produxt will only make that worse, and the company planning to make them is clearly just trying to spin away that problem. If they were serious about the environmental impact of the phone they would have a real turn-in and reconditioning program rather than deceptive claims of recyclability.