Slashdot Mirror


Pigeons Faster than Internet

An anonymous reader writes "The topic of pigeons and modern technology has come up a number of times now. For instance, we have the Google pigeon rank method, and there have been several April fools hoaxes like this previous story and RFC 2549. Now the Waikato Times is reporting in this story about how pigeons are being used to transfer large amounts of data in a short amount of time. The pigeons have proven to be faster and more relieable than electronic means. However, as you will see from the story there is still the occasional packet loss. This is definitely a case of high bandwidth wireless networking."

192 of 265 comments (clear)

  1. Rimshot by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Funny

    [...] the pigeons were 99 per cent reliable, Mr Andreef said. "They also work for peanuts."
    Heh.
    1. Re:Rimshot by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also note, you should make sure the firewall outside your pidgeon coop can see color, as you don't want any of those evil bit containing pidgeons through the door or you may be forced to restart the data transfer as your data packets are scrambled and pooped out in little piles.

      Nore, typically the evil bit comes in the form of a red tail, talons, and a hooked beak. Occasionally it comes on all fours, with a red furry coat, fluffy tail and black tips on it's ears.

    2. Re:Rimshot by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Pidgeons have no text editor preferences, and they can't run GNU. They're just pidgeons.

    3. Re:Rimshot by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Of all crazy things. Last tuesday was my real time systems final exam and modelling this "IP over Avian Carriers" using petri nets was part of the second question. I kid you not.

    4. Re:Rimshot by Wellspring · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You laugh, but check this out. Drug cartels in Pakistan are using carrier pigeons to route messages. The logic is obvious: any landline medium is expensive and can be traced. And any RF technology can be intercepted by American spy satellites.

      If a signal (ie pigeon) is caught, the signal isn't received by the intended receipient. You can also send signals without the sender knowing the physical location of the other party-- useful for security.

      Actually, now what I think of it, that is the area that bin Laden is believed to be hiding out in. If I were him, I'd be using carrier pigeons and dead-drops to communicate with my followers. I'm not sure if we're even looking for them, but even if we were, finding a species of bird in those mountains? Separating it from the non-pigeon birds? Catching the RIGHT pidgeon (if too many pidgeons disappear from being intercepted, you stop talking for a while)?

      Navajo was devastatingly effective in WWII. There was a plan to drop bats equipped with timed incendiaries-- a town was devastated in a test using this weapon. Don't underestimate steam-punk methods.

    5. Re:Rimshot by raehl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If a signal (ie pigeon) is caught, the signal isn't received by the intended receipient.

      Or after you're done reading the message, you could just put it back on the pigeon and let the pigeon go again.....

    6. Re:Rimshot by LegionX · · Score: 1

      Just combine this with PGP encryption :)

    7. Re:Rimshot by phorm · · Score: 1

      And while you are at it, add a small tracer allowing you to track where the pigeon goes. You can trace it to the destination and the sender rather easily this way.

    8. Re:Rimshot by zeroprime · · Score: 1

      I tried putting a firewall up near my pigeon coop a while ago... I guess I didn't configure it correctly and all my pigeons were subsiquently roasted.

      --
      Hey! come on! try dividing it by anything!
    9. Re:Rimshot by Wellspring · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It will be very difficult to capture a pigeon without killing it.

      Special equipment could pull it off, but we'll have to build / buy that, get it to the right people, and even then we still won't know where to use it. Finally, how do you identify pigeons? Only way I know is visually. Soldiers would have to be trained to identify a pigeon themselves (or relay pictures to trained experts, in which case they'd get a response only after a long delay).

      Bottom line: very tough problem to solve.

    10. Re:Rimshot by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      I don't think using carrier pigeons is a good idea when Dick Cheney is after you:

      http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/30155

      I' m glad I'm not a pheasant.

    11. Re:Rimshot by vidnet · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Several attempts have been made, but none have been successful.

    12. Re:Rimshot by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention Tom Lehrer

      "All the world seems in tune on a spring afternoon
      When we're poisoning pigeons in the park..."

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    13. Re:Rimshot by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Obviously The packet over pigeon people haven't seen Packet over Sheep.

      http://www.devilnet.net/rfc3203/

      Its obviously more stable than pigeons :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    14. Re:Rimshot by plotdot · · Score: 1

      As we have seen time and again since 9/11, the only successes against high tech have been low tech, the lower they are, the more successful.

      --
      wags
    15. Re:Rimshot by eam · · Score: 1

      Jamming the signal is trivial. Just release a few hundred hawks in the area. Even if the pigeon doesn't get caught, it might be less willing to fly when the hawks are in the area.

  2. Yes, but my internet connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesn't poop all over the place. I keed! I keed!

  3. So by Pingular · · Score: 5, Funny

    Increasing bandwidth would be cheap enough. Either by more birds or bigger birds. Kind of like servers :)

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:So by lullabud · · Score: 1

      and of course, higher density media.

  4. Mental imagery by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just reading the slashdot blurb, I get the image of a pigeon with a couple of DVD data discs tied to it's feet, and the resulting attempt to fly is quite comical...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Mental imagery by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

      Maybe two of them could carry it together.

    2. Re:Mental imagery by loucura! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are suggesting that DVDs migrate?

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    3. Re:Mental imagery by njvic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that an African or European... whoops wrong species!

    4. Re:Mental imagery by loucura! · · Score: 1

      Now look here, you can't even give the quote properly. It's like you have an aversion to the word "you". Now, you will learn to quote things properly and voluntarily or we will be forced to say "Ni..." at you.

      Ni...

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    5. Re:Mental imagery by LadyLucky · · Score: 1

      If they we're swallows, you could tie it between them.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    6. Re:Mental imagery by null-sRc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are suggesting that DVDs migrate?

      you'd think the regiononal encoding would stop that!

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    7. Re:Mental imagery by Aelfy · · Score: 2, Funny

      pfft... sod the pigeon, DVDs make pretty good frisbees.

      Perfect for transporting data around the office. Just make sure to shout "Incoming Transmission!" before throwing them as they can leave a nasty scar.

    8. Re:Mental imagery by loucura! · · Score: 1

      I'd be inclined to be nicer if he would get the quotes right, nothing is worse than a crazy Python fan who can't even copy and paste properly.

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    9. Re:Mental imagery by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I would not think they do, they are tied to a specific zone.

    10. Re:Mental imagery by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what ever! Read read read. Way too late. Check date next time. Mod sibling up!

    11. Re:Mental imagery by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Until you send them a "DeCSS" pigeon. (read: mate)

  5. Yeah... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny

    *writes note saying "ping" and ties to to a pigeon*

    This is going to take awhile...

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    1. Re:Yeah... by lullabud · · Score: 1

      you know though, i'd say that pigeons are more like a connectionless protocol, like UDP, since you don't really get feedback. homing pigeons are one-way, you know. now, if we could train a dog to run to all the various caves and then back to base it'd be something like token ring.

    2. Re:Yeah... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      You don't need a pigeon for that.

      Just bring in the machine that goes PING! .

      And the most expensive machine in the hospital.

      /Python

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    3. Re:Yeah... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe they could use gollum, and then it would be a tolkein ring.

  6. Still true by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway"

    1. Re:Still true by Pingular · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway"
      -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    2. Re:Still true by inburito · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or, "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a flock of pigeons with blue-laser dvds strapped on to their feet flying on the sky."

    3. Re:Still true by halo8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dont..

      i got a friend that lives a 1/2 hour away.. hour round trip.. we like to exchange warez files.. CD's ISO's 750-1.4Gb. FTP over cable or DSL.. dosent beat me in my car

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    4. Re:Still true by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 5, Interesting

      +4 on that post? Wow. You have singled out an author for a quote that comes in many different shapes and forms. The motivation for doing so is hard for me to comprehend, but I'd like to show you some other forms of it, including the original :

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
      wagon full of tapes.
      - Dr. Warren Jackson, Director, UTCS

      heres some more variations :

      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magtapes.";

      "the highest bandwidth transatlantic data channel was a freighter fully-loaded with punch cards."

      "the bandwidth of magtape and a pickup truck." (c. 1973, DEC, Maynard MA);

      and,

      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a kid on a moped with a backpack full of CDs.";

      finally,

      Dai Davies, director of Dante, which provides high-speed networks to Europe's research institutes, said that before now the highest data transfer speed was achieved by putting the tapes in a van and driving them to where they need to be analysed.

      Delivery vans can carry lots of tapes at the same time which means that Europe's roads have a relatively high bandwidth. "You can send a few hundred megabytes per second through DHL," he said.
      - BBC News, 16 September 2003.;

      Now I thank you for finding one of the many people who have spoken a permutation of the quote, but really it is quite a superfluous and trivial effort. Especially considering we all have the same access to Google that you do. =\ Tanenbaum's version appeared in 1988, but as you can see the line was spoken as early as 1973.

      In conclusion, singling out a person who might have spoken the sentance is pointless. And adds little to the conversation.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    5. Re:Still true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Score: +1, Pedantic

    6. Re:Still true by wiresquire · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Did you look at your sig ?

      --

      So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

    7. Re:Still true by snap2grid · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a box of Blu-ray disks being launched across town with a giant Acme rubber band.

    8. Re:Still true by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Some additions to this impressive list:

      Also, on Computer Stupidities:

      Customer: "What's the fastest way to move 500 megabytes of data daily from Santa Cruz to Los Angeles?"
      Tech Support: "Fed Ex."

      ...and for what it's worth, University of Oulu computer museum has a box of punched cards on display, with a Finnair tag on its side, and a note that it did have higher bandwidth than modems.

    9. Re:Still true by manastungare · · Score: 1

      Someone recently happened to mention that NetFlix is probably the largest bandwidth provider these days.

    10. Re:Still true by sootman · · Score: 1

      And then someone replies to you re: bandwidth vs. latency, and the thread mercifully ends. right? :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    11. Re:Still true by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what you are talking about.

      I am looking at your sig though, and I really hope that you dont think it applies to the comment I am responding to. Oh god.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
  7. Hmmm by mandalayx · · Score: 5, Funny

    The concept had just hit a snag however.

    Nesting karearea (native falcons) have attacked and killed some of the pigeons mid-flight.

    "A pigeon can fly at a cruising speed of 65km/h, 100km/h when pushed," said Mr Andreef. "But native falcons fly at up to 250km/h."

    Once he discovered what was happening to his birds Mr Andreef grounded his 50-pigeon operation.

    He expected the falcons' nesting season to finish within the next few weeks.


    The pigeon communicators better get ready to welcome their new overlords--the Falcons. Can you see the DDoS attacks coming?

    1. Re:Hmmm by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Makes me think of Monty Python and the Holy Grail even though that wasn't pigeons it was swallows.

    2. Re:Hmmm by Passman · · Score: 1

      So wouldn't the Falcons already constitute a Denial of Service?
      And considering they are coming from different nests, you could say it's distributed.

      Therefore, this brand new medium has already suffered its first DDoS. That's gotta be a record.

      --
      Minne-snow-da: Winter is comming...
    3. Re:Hmmm by thogard · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you could open one of these nice cheap flashing bicycle warning lights and put that on the bird as well. At 250km/hr, the flashing lights just might confuse the falcons enough to go find some other dinner (or as the kiwi's would say Tea)

  8. Games by fredrikj · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tried playing Quake III over this, but the ping time made it rather frustrating :|

    1. Re:Games by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now we know the real reason "Duke Nukem Forever: Rats of the Air" was delayed.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Games by arcanumas · · Score: 2, Funny
      If there was significant lag then your connection is low bandwidth. Try purchasing more pigeons.

      If there was 100% packet loss then your firewall may have barbequed the pigeons. Check your back yard.

      Thank you.

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    3. Re:Games by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Wow. It's actually pretty rare for me to laugh because of a Slashdot comment... Meh. Never have mod points when I need 'em...

      --
      Lalala
    4. Re:Games by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 1

      Imagine playing duckhunt using Pigeon Wireless (TM). No client-side software required! (ignore the fact that ducks != pigeons)

    5. Re:Games by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't remember the old play by mail RPG games - you know, before common home computers. By common I'm talkin TRS-80 era kinda stuff.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    6. Re:Games by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      Mail RPG games? Man, that's even geekier than sitting in someone's basement on a Friday night. At least in the basement you get some human contact, even if it's with a bunch of dudes that are either skinny or fat.

      -B

  9. so.... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 5, Funny

    does packet colision occur when the pigeon hole principle comes into effect?

    xao

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
  10. Pigeons Dropping Packets by fastdecade · · Score: 5, Funny

    "the pigeons were 99 per cent reliable"

    The thought of pigeons transferring data gives a whole new meaning to dropping packets.

    I speculate they would become only 60% reliable when flying over statues, park benches, and human beings.

    1. Re:Pigeons Dropping Packets by noone06 · · Score: 1

      Just imagine a pigeon DDOS attack..

    2. Re:Pigeons Dropping Packets by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      It's the newly washed and waxed cars you have to worry about them encountering.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  11. How about .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... swallows ?

    (European or otherwise).

    1. Re:How about .... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      I don't think a dead parrot's going to provide me with a lot of bandwidth. Still, I guess it's better than dial-up.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    2. Re:How about .... by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Mmm, I dunno. What's their airspeed velocity?

    3. Re:How about .... by d3faultus3r · · Score: 1

      They'd need to be African swallows to carry the load and those are nonmigratory. Otherwise you'd need two of them to carry the coconuts...er I mean DVDs or hard drives. Though you could engrave the binary on the coconuts but that would lose a lot of storage space compared to a DVD or hard drive.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
    4. Re:How about .... by UnixRevolution · · Score: 1

      ... swallows ?

      (European or otherwise).


      only if you're serving pr0n.

      --
      You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  12. Large packet size by moeffju · · Score: 1

    Definitely.

    --
    follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
  13. Netflix by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember also the story posted last year - Snail Mail Still Winning The Bandwidth War, where the discussion focused on Netflix.

    I think it's an interesting way to compare the two, but it's ultimately pointless. I can carry my 60 gig HD across the room (or the house) in much faster time than I can send all that data over my home network, and that's likely going to be true as both transfer rates and storage capacity increase with time. Pigeons are novel, of course, but as mentioned earlier, packet loss is a bitch.

    1. Re:Netflix by Kegetys · · Score: 1
      Pigeons are novel, of course, but as mentioned earlier, packet loss is a bitch.

      Not to mention hardware loss, when the pigeon with your 180GB HD tied to its leg doesn't come back.

  14. I wish I were a kid again... by segment · · Score: 2

    Follow That Feather

    Fully aware of the gravity of the situation, Dick Dastardly and his proud men try to eliminate the pigeon with a feather seeking homing missile. the cartoon

  15. Avg velocity of an unladen pigeon, anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So is a swallow faster or slower?

  16. wireless pigeons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    check this page out for wireless pigeon database access

    no idea if the wireless protocol they are using involves avians in transit ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  17. cartoon throwback by segment · · Score: 4, Funny

    Muttley you snickering floppy eared hound, When courage is needed, you're never around! Those medals you wear on your moth-eaten chest, Should be there for bungling at which you are best!

    So, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop that Pigeon

    How?

    Nab him! Jab him! Tab him! Grab him!

    Stop that pigeon

    Now!

    You Zilly, stop sneaking it's not worth the chance, For you'll be returned by the seat of your pants! And Klunk, you invent me a thingamybob, That catches that pigeon, or I lose my job!

    So, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon, Stop The Pigeon

    Stop that Pigeon

    How?

    Nab him! Jab him! Tab him! Grab him!

    Stop that pigeon Now!

    The mp3

  18. One hell of a rush by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "A pigeon can fly at a cruising speed of 65km/h, 100km/h when pushed," said Mr Andreef. "But native falcons fly at up to 250km/h."

    Wow. I realise they won't be going at 250kph for very long (presumably during a swoop down from above) but that's a fantastically fast speed for something of flesh and blood...

    "The terminal velocity of a falling human being with arms and legs outstretched is about 120 miles per hour (192 km per hour) - slower than a lead balloon, but a good deal faster than a feather!" (from falling feather)

    So I guess until someone straps a jetpack on their back and power-dives, no human will ever experience it...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:One hell of a rush by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      So I guess until someone straps a jetpack on their back and power-dives, no human will ever experience it...

      Ummm... you first, then I'll decide whether or not to try, 'kay?

    2. Re:One hell of a rush by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I would imagin the terminal velovity of a human pointing like a bullet is much higher then if you have your arms outstretched.

      Also. if you are horizontal you are much slower. I don't know if the arms outstreched was in that direction or not.

      Lastly. Of course a bird that is designed to dive can do so faster then a mammel designed to stand up strait.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:One hell of a rush by naxi · · Score: 1

      In 1960, Joseph Kittinger set a record for fastest speed by a human through the atmosphere, as well as highest parachute jump and longest freefall. He reached speeds of 614 mph (982 km/hr) and survived the attempt to make other jumps throughout his life.

      Regular skydivers who dive head-down with arms and legs tucked in for more streamlining have achieved speeds of 180 mi/h (290 kph) from average skydiving heights.

      --

      He's dead, Jim. You get his tricorder, I'll get his wallet.
    4. Re:One hell of a rush by kasperd · · Score: 1

      "A pigeon can fly at a cruising speed of 65km/h, 100km/h when pushed," said Mr Andreef.

      And somewhere else he said 20km in about 6 minutes. so which numbers are correct?

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    5. Re:One hell of a rush by seibed · · Score: 1

      remember though: kilometers are kind of like canadian dollars.

    6. Re:One hell of a rush by Ores · · Score: 1

      its an interesting question, it maybe the 20KMs is the distance of the road though

    7. Re:One hell of a rush by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      That's gotta hurt. At terminal velocity, the air exerting enough force on you for it to feel like 1G. And all that on the top of your head...Better hold it straight, or you'll break your neck.

  19. Imagine.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    50,000 pigeons with a note saying "SYN" tied to them flying to Utah..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Imagine.. by herrvinny · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the resulting reply, as 50,000 pigeons drop down to the ground, going "ACK" after getting shot....

    2. Re:Imagine.. by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      *That's* why SCO didn't use SYN cookies - they didn't fancy 50,000 pigeons "delivering the payload" from on high :-)

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    3. Re:Imagine.. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you've got 50,000 pigeons pooping, go for a "buffer overflow" exploit.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Imagine.. by armando_wall · · Score: 1

      "50,000 pigeons with a note saying "SYN" tied to them flying to Utah.."

      LINDON, Utah, Sat 13th, Dec 2003 -- The SCO Group, Inc.

      SCO announced that it's dropping all its current business model based on unix and servers, in favor of a new and promising pigeon market in Lindon.

      "This is so exciting", said Darl McBride, SCO's CEO. "Selling pigeons is definitely the way to go", he added. He didn't discard the possibility of suing pillow vendors who use pigeon feathers as stuffing material without paying licensing fees.

  20. On "Packet" Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nesting karearea (native falcons) have attacked and killed some of the pigeons mid-flight.

    Puts TTL into perspective...

  21. Time for an upgrade by Stalus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "A pigeon can fly at a cruising speed of 65km/h, 100km/h when pushed," said Mr Andreef. "But native falcons fly at up to 250km/h."

    Looks like a perfect opportunity for an upgrade. They just have to train the falcons, and then they'll get a network that's 2.5 times faster, and less likely to be devoured.

  22. Flightspeed? by XaosTX · · Score: 1

    But what IS the flightspeed of an unladen swallow^H^H^H^H^H^Hpigeon?

  23. Faster than the internet? by Trbmxfz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nick Andreef's pigeons are faster than the internet, but no match for falcons.

    Faster than the internet? Let's see:

    - The picture shows a Memory Stick. That's at most 1GB (the blue MS like the one on the picture are at most 256MB, but let's be generous),

    - the pigeons go at 65 kph,

    - they have to travel over 20 km.

    That's 20km/65kph = 1107 seconds. Which converts to slightly less than 942 KBps. Now, I don't know what kind of ISPs they have in New Zealand, but 1MBps shouldn't be that hard to achieve! Even using the announced 3GB capacity of a single bird, that's just 3MBps.

    Maybe if they had used one of those wireless networks they wouldn't need to feed pigeons (and clean up after them)? Even the falcons go at a mere 10MBps bandwidth!

    1. Re:Faster than the internet? by agm · · Score: 1

      Now, I don't know what kind of ISPs they have in New Zealand, but 1MBps shouldn't be that hard to achieve!

      Heh. Then you've never been to NZ, where a connection that fast would have a data cap of 600Mb! I kid you not.

    2. Re:Faster than the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's one line. Just like broadband is made of several smaller lines with individual limits, this pigeon network is made of several pigeons which can EACH carry a packet.
      It even mentions a fleet of 50 pigeons in the article. So if they only had 256MB memory sticks, like the one in the picture, that would be 3.2 GB.
      Again, if you read the article rather than skimmed, it mentioned that the flight time was six minues (600 seconds) That would be equal to about 5.3 MBps. Good luck getting that kind of transfer rate for as much as those pigeons cost them.

    3. Re:Faster than the internet? by phrawzty · · Score: 1

      Well, it's reasonable to assume that he meant it's faster than the internet connectivity he'd otherwise have available. Said connectivity being described as "...phone lines and telephone exchanges of (in)sufficient quality...".

      Even with a ~56k modem, 942KBps is quite a bit faster. :)

    4. Re:Faster than the internet? by dave1g · · Score: 2, Informative

      Traditionally the capital B is used to refer to Bytes and a lower case b is for bits... I don't know of any 1MBps (8 Mbps) ISP that is cheap outside of Korea... I have a 2 Mbps cable modem in Austin, Texas from road runner...

      Wireless (802.11) links over 20km get a lot of attention on Slashdot but are very uncommon, and they might be persistent connections but they are much slower than 11 mbps.

      And if you meant microwave antenna... damn those are super expensive and need perfect line of sight.... The pigeon idea is both novel and apparently, when no falcons are around, also practical.

    5. Re:Faster than the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except fot the fact that they might use just more than one pigeon. I think they said a network of 50, and 0.942 x 50 =47.1 MBbs

    6. Re:Faster than the internet? by Trbmxfz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know of any 1MBps (8 Mbps) ISP that is cheap outside of Korea...

      Japan maybe? But indeed, I goofed; buying several megabit links may not be cheap in most countries (and is apparently impractical in the case explained in the article).

      Wireless (802.11) links over 20km get a lot of attention on Slashdot but are very uncommon

      What? Are you implying that what is said on Slashdot doesn't always closely reflect reality? Man, I'm disappointed!

      Also, assuming fifty falcons, carrying three one-gig memory sticks each, we get up to a whopping 4 gigabits per second. I don't know if I'd let birds handle that many memory cards (they are expensive), though.

      And don't get me started on the ping times, as others have mentioned already.

    7. Re:Faster than the internet? by fredrikj · · Score: 1

      six minues (600 seconds)

      360 seconds.

    8. Re:Faster than the internet? by Trbmxfz · · Score: 3, Funny

      six minues (600 seconds)

      Sorry, I didn't know they used the metric system for minutes too! In the US of A, six minutes are only 360 seconds :-).

      if you read the article rather than skimmed

      Since their figures don't seem to be consistent, I had to discard some of them; 20km at 65kph should take about 18 minutes, not 6. Otherwise, you're of course right: they wouldn't do it if it weren't cheaper than the actual network connection they can get.

    9. Re:Faster than the internet? by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Again, if you read the article rather than skimmed, it mentioned that the flight time was six minues (600 seconds)

      Ah, finally someone else is using metric time.

      Anyway, I've got to run. This chilly Smarch weather has made me sleepy and it's only 25 o'clock!

    10. Re:Faster than the internet? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      It's simply a race.

      Say that your pigeon has an average time V for the velocity (damned physics and their letters). Unless we are building faster pigeons, we'll assume this this average to be fixed. You know you want to reply you monty-python-heads.

      Let's also assume we aren't making storage or jumps in transmition time any faster than before. It's fixed too. S for storage capacity time to double, T for transmition speed to double.

      Which is greater? VS or T? I haven't worked out the units, since I'm lazy, but you get the idea. If storage gets bigger and bigger at a faster rate than the transmition times to double, then pigeons could be a feasible solution -- ala sneaker net?

      Maybe NOW it's silly, but you never know :)

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    11. Re:Faster than the internet? by David_R · · Score: 1

      Now, I don't know what kind of ISPs they have in New Zealand, but 1MBps shouldn't be that hard to achieve!

      Yeah, but these are being used in the middle of nowhere (or, in New Zealand parlance, the wop-wops), where line integrity and signal/noise ratio makes an internet connection of suitable bandwidth unlikely.

      Broadband is experiencing a very slow pick-up through New Zealand; one of the reasons is that it is prohibitively expensive in some parts of the country to get set up, if it's actually available at all.

      If you RTFA, the owner/operation actually says "We don't have phone lines and telephone exchanges of sufficient quality to transmit the data, so we came up with the pigeon concept."

      In conclusion, using pigeons under these circumstances makes sense.

    12. Re:Faster than the internet? by danila · · Score: 1

      No, it's you let see. First, landlines are obviously out of the question. Now about the wireless. 1Mbps is realistically the maximum you can reliably get in remote areas. But 1Mbps means you have to spend 20 minutes sending the data, which means stopping the tour for 20 minutes and sending the data - you don't want to lose you connection, etc. The point of the case, though, was that the tourists don't like to wait!

      Thus the real benefits of pigeouns is near infinite last-mile bandwidth. Like with e-mail, you quickly send the message and disconnect. And you don't have to worry that the recipient will not see it until 20 minutes later.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    13. Re:Faster than the internet? by dave1g · · Score: 1

      OK so there are a few places where you can get such awsome speeds, but... this is in New Zealand...

    14. Re:Faster than the internet? by Isomer · · Score: 1

      Practical internet for consumers in New Zealand is "JetStart" which is 128kbit ADSL. So yeah, it is much faster. :)

    15. Re:Faster than the internet? by trommaster · · Score: 1
      That's 20km/65kph = 1107 seconds. Which converts to slightly less than 942 KBps. Now, I don't know what kind of ISPs they have in New Zealand, but 1MBps shouldn't be that hard to achieve! Even using the announced 3GB capacity of a single bird, that's just 3MBps.

      Sure, but last time i checked, getting an internet connection underground behind kilometers of rock at that speed isn't really possible....

    16. Re:Faster than the internet? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Waitomo is well away from any of the bigger cities, so they won't have ADSL, and possible even have fairly low-grade phone lines.

      Also, decent broadband is -expensive- over here, depending on what plan you have, you get about 500M free and then pay 15c per meg, or more.

      Or you can get 128k with a 10G cap, and 10c/M over that..

      Typical pricing
      here (Telecom 0wn the market, so most other ISP's have similar pricing)

      So even if full-rate ADSL was available, the pigeons would still be a hell of a lot cheaper.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    17. Re:Faster than the internet? by stefanb · · Score: 1
      That's 20km/65kph = 1107 seconds. Which converts to slightly less than 942 KBps.
      Only if you assume that only one pidgeon can be en-route at any time. Over the space of 20 km, and with an unlimited supply of pidgeons, I would guess you could fit at least 20.000 on to the "line". If we use the available space above and to the left and right, probably a lot more.
  24. Packet loss= by vwjeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shotgun

  25. Faster? by AmoebafromSweden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, these pigeons are fast, But can they bet a 747 loaded with DVDs?

    1. Re:Faster? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a 727, but flying fast so it's the equivolent of a 747

  26. A Snag? by durtbag · · Score: 1

    We must report the evil h4X0r falcons to the Dept. of Homeland Security so they can be prosecuted like the terrorists they are.

    --
    itadakimasu
  27. What happens if it is a big load? by IANAL(BIAILS) · · Score: 1

    What about two pigeons carrying it together? I suppose they could have it on a line... they'd just have to use a strand of tree bark and hold it under the dorsal guiding feathers.

    Well why not?

    1. Re:What happens if it is a big load? by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      Actually, the proper technique is called "packet fragmentation." Before departure, the pigeon drops the large packet high over rocks and it fragments everywhere. Multiple pigeons can then each grab fragments well within the Maximum Carrying Unit, and the destination party gets the job of reassembling the packet. Unfortunately, the fragments may be more difficult for the pigeons to carry, and they are more likely to get dropped, especially out there in where the routes the pigeons take might be loaded with unexpected hinderances...

      Okay, okay, so I shouldn't quit my day job, I know...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    2. Re:What happens if it is a big load? by Mris · · Score: 1

      "Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate?"

  28. Stop that markedroid talk! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    transfer large amounts of data in a short amount of time

    I want numbers! KBPS, % packet loss, maximum latency, roundtrip time, number of hops to destination! No stupid "large amounts"!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Stop that markedroid talk! by simonecaldana · · Score: 1

      does # of Library of Congress please you? ;)

  29. IP over avian carriers implementation by gspr · · Score: 1

    Although lacking "quality of service information", the closely related RFC 1149 has been implemented by the Bergen LUG.

  30. s/swallow/pigeon/ (was Re:Mental imagery) by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    SOLDIER #2: Wait a minute! Supposing two pigeons carried it together?
    SOLDIER #1: No, they'd have to have it on a line.
    SOLDIER #2: Well, simple! They'd just use a strand of creeper!
    SOLDIER #1: What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
    SOLDIER #2: Well, why not?

    1. Re:s/swallow/pigeon/ (was Re:Mental imagery) by 56ker · · Score: 1

      The reference is to Monty Python and the Holy Grail in case anyone doesn't know already.

  31. exploit! by Coyote · · Score: 5, Funny

    birdtraq has a posting documenting the 'falcon exploit' describing it as a DOS (denial of seed) attack similar to the 'buckshot' attack, in that not only is the route broken, but the media is eaten. It is noted that even though the carrier may seasonally be reclassified as 'lunch' the data payload may be considered unappetizing and therefore recoverable. Affected users may attempt the alternate SSL (Slow Sparrow Layer) method in hopes of being overlooked. The vulnerability affects owl users of Linux and Windows. In a related story, SCO claims that since it has proved in court that it owns all code ever written, it will be selling licenses on a per egg basis to existing pigeon owners as soon as the massive hummingbird attack on its own server ends.

    --
    My metamoderation cancels your moderation
    1. Re:exploit! by dwillden · · Score: 1

      BRAVO, That needs a +20 funny

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  32. An added advantage by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    When a spammers sends a load to you, the pigeon will hit the firewall.

    Have plenty of barbeque sauce on hand. (Although Szechwan peanut sauce is nice too.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  33. I still prefer TCP/IP by Guiri · · Score: 2, Funny

    TCP/IP doesn't leave shits all over the place

    1. Re:I still prefer TCP/IP by kruczkowski · · Score: 2, Funny

      I take it your not a firewall admin.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  34. python by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1

    and for extra bandwidth, two pigeons could string a load of dvd-rs onto a strand of creeper.

    held under the dorsal guiding feathers, naturally...

  35. if it were swallows instead... by mraymer · · Score: 5, Funny

    SOLDIER #1: Where'd you get the data?
    ARTHUR: We found it.
    SOLDIER #1: Found it? In here? That's impossble!
    ARTHUR: What do you mean?
    SOLDIER #1: Well, there's no Internet access for miles.
    ARTHUR: The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin or the plover may seek warmer climes in winter, yet these are not strangers to our land?
    SOLDIER #1: Are you suggesting data migrates?
    ARTHUR: Not at all. It could be carried.
    SOLDIER #1: What? A swallow carrying a case DVDs?
    ARTHUR: It could grip it by the edge!
    SOLDIER #1: It's not a question of where he grips it! It's a simple question of weight ratios! A five ounce bird could not carry a one pound DVD case.
    ARTHUR: Well, it doesn't matter. Will you go and tell your master that Arthur from the Court of Camelot is here?
    SOLDIER #1: Listen. In order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings forty-three times every second, right?
    ARTHUR: Please!
    SOLDIER #1: Am I right?
    ARTHUR: I'm not interested!
    SOLDIER #2: It could be carried by an African swallow!
    SOLDIER #1: Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European swallow. That's my point.
    SOLDIER #2: Oh, yeah, I agree with that.
    ARTHUR: Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court at Camelot?!
    SOLDIER #1: But then of course a-- African swallows are non-migratory.
    SOLDIER #2: Oh, yeah.
    SOLDIER #1: So, they couldn't bring the DVDs back anyway.
    SOLDIER #2: Wait a minute! Supposing two swallows carried it together?
    SOLDIER #1: No, they'd have to have it on a line.
    SOLDIER #2: Well, simple! They'd just use a strand of creeper!
    SOLDIER #1: What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
    SOLDIER #2: Well, why not?

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  36. LBC? by OutRigged · · Score: 1

    How many Libraries of Congress can it transfer per second?

    --
    RaGe
    We're all just noise on the wires..
  37. TCP/IP? by Wateshay · · Score: 1

    I certainly hope they're using UDP. TCP would seem to have a bit too high latency to be practical.

    Hmm... multicasting would be a bitch.

    --

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

  38. This can only lead to one thing. by gklinger · · Score: 1

    Pidgeon porn.

  39. Too bad.... by twoslice · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am not vetrenarian - I have rescued a crashed server before - but I don't think I could save a crashed pigeon...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Too bad.... by Peridriga · · Score: 1

      I guess the old problem solving technique

      1) Reboot
      2) Technical Tap (kick)

      Probably won't work in that case either

  40. The old solutions are sometimes the best by pbug · · Score: 1

    This solution makes my think about how many times we want to throw technology at a problem. When the answer is something that is has already been done.

  41. Poisoning Pigeons in the Park by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think Tom Lehrer is a bigger threat to pigeon network security.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  42. Haven't they read Harry Potter? by Beek · · Score: 1

    Owls are the way to go!

    1. Re:Haven't they read Harry Potter? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Not if you're routing traffic through Twin Peaks. The owls are not what they seem.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  43. I can imagine... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a DDoS attack over this looking like a scence out of Hitchcock's The Birds...

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  44. Latency...? by f97tosc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bandwith may be OK, but the latency must be horrible. I don't think I'll sign up for Counterstrike using this method... /Tor

    1. Re:Latency...? by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

      Everyone's excuse for dying in CS is because of latency. "OMG PING TIMES!!!". I frankly don't think anything will change.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    2. Re:Latency...? by Stephonovich · · Score: 1
      Yes, I agree. It cracks me up when people whine about their ping getting up to 30ms. I put up with 300ms regularly, and a good day is low 200's. When I mention this to the people I've just killed, they oddly don't have an answer.

      I figure once I get broadband, I'm gonna do a ton better.

      (-:Stephonovich:-)

      --
      "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
    3. Re:Latency...? by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

      ONLY 300ms on 56k?

      When I had 56k, I usually had 800ms.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  45. Send CD's via. FexEx has very high bandwidth by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1
    An extremely high bandwidth information channel is to send CD-R's overnight via. FedEx.
    • Extremely high bandwidth
    • Extremely high reliability
    Unfortunantly, poor latency, but still good enough for many uses.

    650 (MB) x 1024 x 1024 / 24 / 60 / 60 = 7888.59 bytes per second throughput. And that's only for 650 MB on a CD, and only 1 CD in the FedEx envelope. Multiply this "throughput" by how ever many CDR's you can stuff into a FedEx overnight envelope. And by doing so, you do not increase your latency.

    So if you have a mountain of data, say from a supercomputer, this may be the fastest (not lowest latency) way to send it to a remote location. Faster than any real Internet connection.

    This is also a good way to explain the difference between "bandwidth" and "latency". Good to know when someone is wanting to sell you a "high speed" satellite based internet connection. Just what do you mean by high-speed? Latency or Bandwidth, or both, or niether?
    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    1. Re:Send CD's via. FexEx has very high bandwidth by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      But you multiply by how ever many CDR's you can cram into the overnight envelope. How many? 20? 30? Also, someone pointed out that you can't beat the cost for this bandwidth.

      Finally, I should mention that you could use DVD-R's instead of CDR's.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
  46. pong by Peridriga · · Score: 5, Funny

    pong **** CARRIER LOST

    wow.... That phrase has a great deal more irony now.

  47. Of course someone did ! by Jesrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    So I guess until someone straps a jetpack on their back and power-dives, no human will ever experience it...

    Michel fournier is planning to attempt to skydive from 130,000 feet and reach supersonic speeds (1200 to 1600 kmph / 750 to 1000 mph).

    Nick Piantanida tried and failed to do that in 1965. And all these are unpowered skydives.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  48. it's new cause it's digital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Maybe it's a first for digital images, but its been done for years by rafting companies
    http://www.interbug.com/pigeon/pigeons_ in_the_news /news.cgi?rec_id=21
    and no doubt by various spy groups and such.

  49. 1.8" drives? by Stephonovich · · Score: 1
    Now then, on the subject of stringing something between two pigeons... what about Toshiba's new 40GB 1.8" drives? They weigh about ~ 2 ozs., and are ~ 2x3x.3". Now, the average pigeon is about 1 lb., or a little under. So, if you've got two of 'em, that's 1/16 of their weight. Methinks they could handle that. And as for bandwidth, that's 6MBps, unless my math is screwed up. Which is all too likely. Anyway, um, yeah...

    (-:Stephonovich:-)

    --
    "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
  50. oops by CanadaDave · · Score: 1
    "Nesting karearea (native falcons) have attacked and killed some of the pigeons mid-flight.

    Once he discovered what was happening to his birds Mr Andreef grounded his 50-pigeon operation."

    Whoopsies.

  51. are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they african or european pigeons?

  52. Next up: pigeon network h4xx0rz by thirty2bit · · Score: 4, Funny

    New York Times: Youth Arrested for Pigeon Tampering

    [ name withheld ] was arrested for using an illeagle Pigeon Network Sniffer and accessing huge amounts of data being shuttled by the pigeon network over the last two weeks.

    Police say the h4xx0r sat in Central Park, using large amounts of high-quality seed strewn on open ground to re-route the network data stream and hijack the transfer media. The pigeon data was then compromised and copied to the thief's laptop.

    Authories say that pigeon network customers became suspicious when network latency increased.

    1. Re:Next up: pigeon network h4xx0rz by jpetts · · Score: 1

      using an illeagle Pigeon Network Sniffer

      Surely an ill eagle could never catch a pigeon?

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  53. P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by karlandtanya · · Score: 5, Funny

    Penises have higher bandwidth than cable modems. [The following found, of course, on the Internet.]

    The human genome is about 3,120,000,000 base pairs long, so half of that is in each spermatozoa -- 1,560,000,000 base pairs . Each side of these base pairs can either be an adenine -thymine or a guanine -cytosine bond, and they can be aligned either direction, so there are four choices. Four possibilities for a value means it can be fully represented with two bits; 00 = guanine, 01 = cytosine, and so forth.

    The figures that I've read state the number of sperm in a human ejaculation to be anywhere from 50 to 500 million. I'm going to go with the number 200,000,000 sperm cells , but if anyone knows differently, please tell me.

    Putting these together, the average amount of information per ejaculation is 1.560*10^ 9* 2 bits * 2.00*10^ 8, which comes out to be 6.24*10 ^17 bits. That's about 78,000 terabytes of data! As a basis of comparison, were the entire text content of the Library of Congress to be scanned and stored, it would only take up about 20 terabytes. If you figure that a male orgasm lasts five seconds , you get a transmission rate of 15,600 tb/s . In comparison, an OC-96 line (like the ones that make up much of the backbone of the internet ) can move .005 tb/s. Cable modems generally transmit somewhere around 1/5000th of that .

    If you consider signal to noise , though, the figures come out much differently. If only the single sperm cell that fertilizes the egg counts as signal , you get (1.560*10^ 9* 2 bits) / 5 s = 6.24*10^ 8bits/s, or somewhere in the neighborhood of 78 Mb/s . Still a great deal more bandwidth than your average cable modem.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hmm.. so it's kinda like using Bittorrent if I download pr0n and then "keep the connection open" after - download 700MB, upload 78,000TB ;)

    2. Re:P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by LazloTheDog · · Score: 1
      I guesss that neasb Penis Birds can solve all our bandwidth problmes!!

      JM

      --
      Oink, Oink!!
    3. Re:P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by BLiP2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Welcome to the slashdot autopost reply menu. Please select a reply to the parent post from the choices below:

      [A] A masturbation joke involving terms such as "packet loss"

      [B] A lonely geek joke involving "being unable to find a server to connect to." (this post may include vague allusions to male/female connector ports.)

      [C] A viagra/erectile dysfunction joke involving "hardware malfunction" and "connection stalling."

      [D] (Advanced users) a BDSM joke involving master/slave hardware configurations.

      --
      Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
    4. Re:P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by seibed · · Score: 1

      Brings new meaning to the term 'syn flood'

    5. Re:P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Parent was copied verbatim from this node, which includes some interesting follow-ups...

    6. Re:P....., not Pigeons have the bandwidth! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Sure.
      Of course, you get packet loss of 99.9999999 per cent.

  54. RFC1149 implemented by RPoet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The LUG in my area, Bergen Linux User Group, implemented RFC1149 when Alan Cox visited (of course he was a key part of the project). Pigeons were used in a real-life experiment that had IP implemented over avian carriers. See the details with pictures here.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  55. Hold the envelope to your forehead? by djupedal · · Score: 1

    You would still have to insert and mount those 50 Memory Sticks. The 3.2gb of data isn't received until it is online. You have to strip the birds, run inside and poke them all into readers, etc.

    Once I have that much data on my computer, I can read it almost instantly. Seems someone is overlooking the practicality of this issue just for chatter sake.

    1. Re:Hold the envelope to your forehead? by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      Must be fun trying to stuff the birds into the card readers....

  56. This IS NZ by The+Ancients · · Score: 1
    Our fastest internet (not counting 100Mbit fibre available in Wellington for exorbitant cost) is 8Mbit ADSL. I live 30 metres away from a DSLAM equipped Fibre Fed Cabinet, and can get 800KB/s maximum. Most people are further away, and hence slower.

    The most popular adsl (75% of customers are on it) is limited to 128Kb/s (16KB/s). Why? The price of this is approximately US$30, for 5 or 10GB cap (dependent on ISP). 10GB per month on the full speed is $US450 approximately, and 256Kb/s (32KB/s) is $US25 for 500MB (yes, MB).

    So yes, 1Mbit per second here, while not impossible, is hugely expensive, geographically limited, and capped. Not to mention we have an incumbent Network telecomms company who think that 500MB is all customers want, or need.

  57. Sometimes from the article title alone.... by volpe · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you can tell that 95% of the "Score 5" posts are going to be modded "Funny".

  58. RFC 2549 security update by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Funny

    RFC 2549 needs a security extension to address man (falcon) in the middle insecurity. I propose encoding multiple packets per UDP-style transmission. The Waitomo network lab can report on the "fodder multiplier" necessary to ensure that network noise consumes only superflous redundant packets. A received ACK packet (similarly multiplied) can be flown back to confirm transmission.

    Perhaps a honeypot project can be used to capture attacker packets, baited with pigeons^Wpackets with a low TTL. Once recoded, these "black hat" falcons^Wpackets might be retrained for security enhancement, or experiments with a lower-latency protocol.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  59. It wouldn't get too far by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Jack & the MPAA goons would either ban the pigeons or shoot them down in the name of "copyright protection" ;)

  60. I've seen pigeon packet loss firsthand... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I think we should come up with an engineering specification for packet recovery, utilizing freshly-washed cars. My car recovers damn near 100% of lost pigeon packets whenever I park it outside, so the proof-of-concept is valid.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  61. yeah this is great for now... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    But once it becomes mainstream the service providers are just gonna put caps on the pigeons making them as slow as standard DSL.

  62. I wonder... by Stile+65 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How well will the Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite work over IP over Avian Carriers with QoS? Anyone try it? If you have any implementation tips, particularly for decreasing lag between ZOO and SIMIAN, please post them here.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  63. I'm interested in this. by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

    I'll begin using this when I Linux network driver to interface is coded into the kernel.

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  64. 747s by LauraW · · Score: 1
    My favorite variant on this is from Snow Crash:
    In order to transmit the same amount of information on paper, they would have to arrange for a 747 cargo freighter packed with telephone books and encyclopedias to power dive into their unit every couple of minutes, forever.
    (describing the bandwidth the protagonist has available in the storage unit where he lives)
  65. Should use parrots by johno.ie · · Score: 1

    rfc2549 should use parrots instead of pigeons. There would be numerous advantages since parrots can be trained to memorise additional data, perform simple tasks, and of course you could implement parrot-y checking on all your packets.

    --
    872835240
  66. [E] Pythonesque by Gorimek · · Score: 3, Funny

    There has to be a good swallow joke to be made from it too. If you know what I mean.

    1. Re:[E] Pythonesque by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is, and it's the funniest joke in the world. Unfortunately, I'm in the US. If I were to post it, I would run afoul of the Export Control Act of 1949.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  67. The Future of Outsourcing? by achaudhary · · Score: 1

    Damn. Just when I'd thought we'd reached the limits.

  68. RAIP by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Redundant Array of Inexpensive Pigeons should solve the reliability problems.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    1. Re:RAIP by pyrote · · Score: 1

      Redundant Array of Inexpensive Pigeons should solve the reliability problems.

      Ya but they are a bugger to get formatted.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  69. More information on the pigeons by Norman+the+Wise · · Score: 1

    I don't think this has been posted, but there is a picture of one of the pigeons on the Waitomo Adventures Website as well as some more information... like what happens if the pigeon doesn't come back... well you either get a free t-shirt or if the pigeon ever comes back they'll send you your pics. I think it's a pretty good idea, as it gets the job done, and the charge for the photos covers the "overhead" (pigeon feed, coops, new pigeons, etc.)

    --
    Just another two cents from the Norm...
  70. Re:Faster than the internet? - funny reply by dave1g · · Score: 1

    :-)

    I have posted so I can't moderate, but you made me laugh lol

  71. RIAA says by Phoinix · · Score: 2, Funny

    P2P now stands for Pegeon to Pr0n!

  72. [F] (Reserved for future expansion) by BLiP2 · · Score: 1

    If you have installed a Bukkake hardware module, you may also access jokes dealing with wireless (over the air) technology.

    --
    Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
  73. Re:One hell of a rush (nitpick) by bluelip · · Score: 1

    Humans do fall faster than 250 kph (155 mph).

    According to www.dropzone.com, " a 165 pound guy in a freefall suit did get 244 mph during the competition."

    We don't have to wait for jetpacks, but you will have to change your body position while flying.

    http://dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?pos t= 385239;search_string=freefall%20speed;#385239

    --

    Yep, I never spell check.
    More incorrect spellings can be found he
  74. Savin my pennies by Aqua_Geek · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute! You mean I'm scraping couch change together each month for a non top-of-the-line product??

    That's it, time to buy some pigeons.

    I wonder if pigeons will become the next .com. Can you imagine: new Internet Service Pigeon companies starting up all over the place?

    --
    Disclaimer: This comment was generated by a Flock of Trained Microsoft Programmers for Aqua_Geek.
  75. The literal sense by billyradcliffe · · Score: 1

    It will mean a whole new things now when someone claims their network took a shit on them...

  76. Right by blair1q · · Score: 1

    It's only faster than digital communications if there's no wire anywhere near where you release the pigeon.

    Woopie-ding-shit.

  77. What if we strapped our pigeon slaves... by No.+24601 · · Score: 1

    to AOL cds instead?

  78. Reminds me of something from RFC 2549... by zhenlin · · Score: 1
    RFC 2549:
    Encapsulation may be done with saran wrappers. Unintentional encapsulation in hawks has been known to occur, with decapsulation being messy and the packets mangled.
  79. Quote... by chuckw · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a quote I once read:

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magnetic tapes hurtling down the highway!" -Unknown

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  80. Another quote by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    This article reminded me of this quote:

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon traveling at 60 MPH."

    --
    SIGFAULT
  81. In other news... by monoqlith · · Score: 1

    The pigeon economy has gained 500000000 new jobs, all in the telecommunications sector. Page 4 Editorial: I am delighted to see that at last, those poor pigeons are being employed. The job market for pigeons has declined for many years, and I long wondered whether the pigeon economy would ever improve. Far be it from me to expect this economic turn around, for which I can only credit our president, George W. Bush, and his clever tax cuts. Now that we have found that pigeons are in fact a technological marvel disguised as the simple city-dwelling fowl we have always thought them to be, the job market for pigeons should improve immensely. But more importantly, it is now that, when I see those pigeons in Central Park, darting around & nibbling on bread crumbs, I can say with a straight face, "Get a job, bums!" Kudos, pigeons!

  82. Cargo Ships by flyingman · · Score: 1

    I still maintain the idea that the bandwith of a 800' container ship full of 200 GB hard disks shipped across the Atlantic is huge, e.g. 50 Pb / s.

    Ping time, however, is probably pretty low (10 days) and if the ship sinks you'll have 100% packet drop - eh - loss.

  83. Pigeons faster than internet by Ebenwolfe · · Score: 1

    I wonder.... Would flying pigs constitute spam...? Would spam only be illegal in Muslim airspace...? Would Jews find the whole "airnet" unkosher...? Would a depot for the "airnet" be called a salon...? Should I try to make real friends and get out? Not more...Just out...

  84. Security? by freakmn · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be incredibly insecure? The data could be easily intercepted. But on the other hand, it seems to be the trend that many companies entrust their confidential files to a bunch of birdbrains, so it might not be that different....

    --
    warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.