Slashdot Mirror


Smart Billboards

djdanlib writes "The New York Times ran this story Sunday about the Mobiltrak smart billboard system. It works by detecting what radio station you're listening to as you pass by a billboard, then displaying advertisements targeted at that station's demographic. It's kind of like a real-time Nielsen Ratings system for radio. And it's entirely passive, requiring no special hardware in your car - it receives the faint tuning signal generated by your radio." We've mentioned these before.

313 comments

  1. Oh boy... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Oh boy... by TWX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous."

      How about the flip side? I listen to NPR a lot, and if enough people are listening to non-corporate radio, it'll be really interesting to see what kinds of ads are displayed.

      Of course in Phoenix, almost all of the corporate stations are running extremely frequent ads for adult stores like "The Castle Boutique" and "Fascinations", or ads for participating in medical studies, so the content could get rather lewd or strange if these advertisers take to the billboards...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Oh boy... by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you claiming there's no advertising on NPR? I guess plugs for sponsors don't count for some. They do for me, however.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:Oh boy... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How about the flip side? I listen to NPR a lot, and if enough people are listening to non-corporate radio, it'll be really interesting to see what kinds of ads are displayed.

      Wow, I must be further left-of-center than I thought. NPR isn't corporate radio?
      To answer your original ponder about what kind of ads, how about ADM, Saab, Keane, etc. They're still ads, they're still for-profit corporations paying money for their ads to be placed on advertiser-supported broadcast radio.
      Pledge drives support the operations budget of the local re-broadcaster, not NPR.

      --
    4. Re:Oh boy... by TWX · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're not sitting there with ten minutes of bombardment from your local automobile dealerships advertising $10,000 for your trade, commercials for anti-depression medication, ads from your local nightclubs talking about the ladies that'll be there Thursday night, etc...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Oh boy... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yum - federally funded radio! I can see the ads now:

      "Vote for this politician, who is just like the other one, except for his stance on the death penalty!"

      "Support our drive to change this wholly irrelevant government policy! Ignore the $=power equation, and the fact that you=$0!"

      "Vote! Cloak the government in the mantle of legitimacy!"

      "Vote twice! Cloak the government in the Mantle of Legitimacy +2!"

      Corporate sponsorship is fundamentally no different from federal sponsorship. Both sponsors want you to be a good sheep. Both hold up the threat of mutton to encourage you to permit your fleecing.

    6. Re:Oh boy... by Enzondio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pledge drives support NPR as well because local stations have to pay to get NPR programming, thus they support NPR with funds obtained (in most cases anyway) primarily from pledge drives.

      It's indirect, but it's still support.

    7. Re:Oh boy... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Forget the plugs for sponsors... the @#!*$^!! begging season is the *real* pain. Fortunately, it's all temporally colocated, so I can find somewhere else to listen to classical music for a month or so.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    8. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate sponsorship is fundamentally no different from federal sponsorship.

      Yeah, I can't tell the difference between Fox News and NPR.

      When does Old Navy plan to fire up the ovens and gas all the Jews that they can get their hands on?

      Yeah, that's what I thought. Corporate sponsorship doesn't mean it's wonderful, but for all the abuses, it's quite different than letting the government control more and more. Many of the large corporations (steel anyone? IBM?) aren't players any more, and most wield any significant power for far shorter periods than the government itself.

      I think you've been listening to NPR too much, and please, don't vote Dean or Darth Nader.

    9. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no Dean? Who then?

    10. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When does Old Navy plan to fire up the ovens and gas all the Jews that they can get their hands on?

      I don't know, but if it means that I won't have to see any more Old Navy ads, then show me to the showers...

    11. Re:Oh boy... by IM6100 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Garrison Keillor used to have a whole routine set up around the fact that he could mention who sponsored his programming, but that he wasn't supposed todisclose what they produced or turn it into a commercial. He used to joke around for a minute on Prairie Home Companion about 'This Program brought to you by Cargill' and then guess (wrongly with humour) about what products Cargill might possibly produce.

      Now, Keillor and his ilk just rattle out a whole ditty for each corporate sponsor, written by that sponsor, often a regular commercial for whatever of their current products they want shilled.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    12. Re:Oh boy... by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous.

      It could get worse. I spend most of my driving time listening to (and using) a CB radio.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    13. Re:Oh boy... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      There is never 10 minutes of commercials between programs. The programmers know people wouldn't stand for it and would change the channel.

      Has it been that long since you viewed non-taxpayer supported television/radio?

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    14. Re:Oh boy... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Funny
      Has it been that long since you viewed non-taxpayer supported television/radio?

      I recently viewed non-taxpayer supported radio, but I got bored after it just sat there doing nothing for a while.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    15. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr, uhh ... just how much money do the feds give to NPR?

    16. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To answer your original ponder about what kind of ads, how about ADM, Saab, Keane, etc."

      Don't forget about Microsoft. Their slogan on NPR still makes me laugh out loud: "Your potential inspires us to make software to help you reach it." I'm not joking. That's their actual slogan. It's the kind of sentence that you have to say to yourself a few times just to understand.

      "Pledge drives support the operations budget of the local re-broadcaster, not NPR."

      No. Although money from pledge drives goes to local stations, they still have to pay tens of thousands of dollars each year to NPR and other programs they carry. So, ultimately, quite a bit of the money from pledges goes to NPR.

    17. Re:Oh boy... by 2short · · Score: 1

      Most people must stand for more ads on radio than I will, I never make it through a comercial break.

      Personally, my listening goes about 50-50 between radio supported entirely by advertisements and that supported by some less intrusive advertisements, but mostly by voluntary contributions of listeners.

      Does anyone listen to taxpayer supported radio much? I can't pick up Voice of America in my area, and I hear the programming is pretty lame in any case.

    18. Re:Oh boy... by TWX · · Score: 1

      We have NPR stations KJZZ and KBAQ in the Phoenix area. KJZZ does NPR talk show stuff during the day, which is often fairly interesting, and Jazz at night. KBAQ is classical, 24/7. Unfortunately KBAQ's transmitter is painfully low-powered, so they don't come in terribly well in many parts of the city.

      NPR's stuff on KBAQ is mostly limited to quick news blurbs and some Garrison Keeler stuff. KJZZ is the station that spends a lot of money on the full time programming, some of which is subsidized by the government's budget. I've found that NPR's news is good because it doesn't seem to sensationalize stuff nearly as much, and unlike other talkshows on corporate radio, they seem to give more fair airtime to people with contrasting views on a particular subject. "Talk" on most other stations seems to be "rant at" more than conversation.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    19. Re:Oh boy... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      It's always one week. With little breaks for the news.

      And the announcers getting hysterical trynig to meet their quotas each hour.

    20. Re:Oh boy... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Is the Howard Stern show still on the radio these days? That could get dangerous.

      I actually remember Howard Stern talking about this type of receiver for stray heterodyne tuning signals back when someone figured out how to do it and Robin was reporting about it in the "news". (This was years ago. Once he realized he could get women to take their clothes off in his studio, the show really went downhill.)

      He loved the idea, since he always maintained that a large number of his listeners don't like him or are ashamed of themselves for listening to him, and this hurts his ratings since such people will not report their true listening habits to Nielsen. He called it the greatest invention in human history.

    21. Re:Oh boy... by DangerousBeauty · · Score: 1
      As a compulsive radio station surfer, I wonder if somehow in my psychotic hunt for a good station, if I happened to be driving by these billboards, could I short them out? Or wreak some other havoc.

      I would think that this would also not work at all in high traffic areas, due to the volume of cars/radio stations.

      Of course I'm sure they've thought about all that.

      --
      *A Life Without Compromise*
    22. Re:Oh boy... by 2short · · Score: 3, Informative

      As I refered to obliquely, about 50% of my listening is to my local NPR member. Here in Colorado, there's a similar split: an all classical music station, and a "News and Information" station that's really the "everything else" station. I'd be really happy if they set it up so I could give my donation to just the "News and Information" part. I've got nothing against Classical music; I just don't listen to it. Of course, then I'd be wishing they'd ditch the jazz and really do pure "News and Information".

      Anyhow, by asking if anyone listened to taxpayer supported radio, I was actually trying to make a probably way too subtle point...

      My local public radio station gets some high 90s percent of it's budget from listener contributions, which I beleive is typical. Most of their content comes from NPR or PRI, which in turn get almost all their funding from dues paid by the aforementioned local stations. Both at the local and national level, the public radio organizations get very small amounts of funding for specific purposes from competive government grants. Anyone can compete for these grants; there is no specific public radio funding in the US or Colorado budget.
      So I don't think it's reasonable to call NPR "taxpayer supported radio". (You'd have a much better case for referring to Boeing as "taxpayer supported aviation", which I doubt the original poster is in the habit of doing.)
      Thus, for (admittedly minor) humerous effect, I chose to pretend he was talking about the only actual "taxpayer supported radio" I know of: The US propaganda network Voice of America, which cheifly brodcasts overseas.

      So now I've taken my original quick smart-ass post and competely beaten it into the ground. (Does that make this a long, dumb-ass post?)

    23. Re:Oh boy... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      So THAT's what their trying to say... I thought it was "Your potential inspires us to make software to help you read shit" Didn't make any sense.

      Really...

    24. Re:Oh boy... by hazem · · Score: 1

      Do you have much experience with anything like Serius radio or XM? I'm strongly considering it - I would be willing to pay $11/month for commerical free music.

      More on the topic of these billboards, it wouldn't take much to make fake transmitters that could fake them out. One could set their transmitter for the oldies station, and the darn things would only ever show X-lax, Metamucil, and AARP commercials!

    25. Re:Oh boy... by mwooldri · · Score: 1

      Sure there may be "underwriting" on NPR... but think about this outside the USA for a minute. There are other countries where radio *is* pretty much non-commercial. Londons' Piccadilly Circus would be a perfect example of a place where this technology would work... but what kind of listener listens to BBC Radio 4? There are no adverts, not even underwriting on BBC stations.

      I guess (for the paranoid) TV Licensing could take out a series of ads. Imagine driving down the road, and seeing your name on this electronic billboard... "Hey! You! In the Blue Ford! Why haven't you paid your TV Licence?" I'd be dead scared if I saw that (yes I do drive a blue-ish coloured Ford!)

      Mark.

    26. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be especially scared if I saw that because it would mean that the retards that put the billboard up couldnt spell 'license'.

      Moron.

    27. Re:Oh boy... by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 0

      Well, I guess I might have to get rid of the scanner that let's me listen to the Communist Propaganda station.

      But, seriously, doesn't it seem like it would create a major discrepancy for advertisers? Advertisers pay so that they can get seen (and, in some cases, regardless of the demographic). If an advertiser for some upscale product places an ad, and gets stuck because nobody listens to whatever station it caters to, how would the pricing work? Because, even if they don't get charged for the ad-time, they still have to pay some money to develop the ad and would presumably want some guanateed viewtime to at least diffuse the development costs? Not like billboard ads would be so expensive to develop.

      Plus, it doesn't seem to make much sense to me. On the road, much of the advertising is geared towards "impulse" purchases. Granted, there are the car ads and such, but the vast majority of the ads are of the "Wendy's Next Exit" or "Shell 2 MI" sort that you might want to show regardless (and sort of have a demographic-neutral appeal). I don't think radio station preference has much of an influence on fast food preference, or gas preference (I could be wrong). It makes sense to me to keep the specialized advertising for television and magazines (where it's somewhat more reliable to determine the audience, rather than driving, where the major convern is where am I going and where can I get gas/food).

      And of course it gets complicated in congested areas where it's anybody's guess which ad they should display (I imagine the majority or the stations, but then how is that any different from how it presently is?).

    28. Re:Oh boy... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [laughing] Or what about my truck's radio? It hasn't worked in years! Hmm... maybe as I drive down the road, all the billboards will go blank. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    29. Re:Oh boy... by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Pledge drives support the operations budget of the local re-broadcaster, not NPR"

      That's rather misleading. Most of NPRs funding comes from dues paid by the local re-broadcasters, and hence from those pledge drives. A smaller portion of their funding comes from the companies you mention, and I'd agree with you in calling them ads. But they're a lot less obtrusive than the ones "comercial" radio. The advertising message isn't even "ADM makes great products"; it's "ADM is a nice company because they support NPR". In short, I have much less concern that NPRs editorial integrity might be compromised by the companies that support them.

      So I guess you could call them "corporate radio" but I'd call them "vastly less corporate influenced than any other radio organization with enough resources to produce worthwhile content".

    30. Re:Oh boy... by robslimo · · Score: 1

      KOSU in Stillwater, OK has reduced it to 3 days, starting last year or so. They say pretty much what the earlier poster said, "Pledge early and well and we'll get this annoyance over with." It has worked out quite well.

  2. Would love to see this on a freeway by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Talk about blipverts...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  3. Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Ryunosuke · · Score: 0, Insightful

    While I'm sure this was a good idea 10 years ago ... it's almost 2004. Auto mp3 players are under $150, who actually listens to the radio anymore? I've not listened to anything FM for 4 or 5 years ... sounds like they're a little behind the times.

    1. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by phil+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Auto mp3 players are under $150, who actually listens to the radio anymore?

      uh, people who want traffic reports? People who want to listen to the news or weather?

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    2. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Ryunosuke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I agree, and you're most likely right. I'm one of those weird people that gets prepared before they go out.

    3. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      I listen to a lot of sporting events on the radio. I haven't got the channel to watch Norwegian football live, so I listen to it on the radio, but I'd probably go nuts if somebody interrupted the football match to tell me how cheap I can get the latest footballshoes at the nearest store.

    4. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by worst_name_ever · · Score: 5, Funny
      People who want to listen to the news or weather?

      Oh man, you are so behind the times. I ripped all my news and weather reports to mp3's a long time ago. Now I can listen to peace treaties or car bombings, sunny weather or rain, depending on my mood on any given day! It's great!

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    5. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by smoondog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I listen to the radio. NPR. I commute and get my news on the way to work each morning.

      -Sean

    6. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I listen to the radio when I'm driving about town. Out in the country the radio signals are often too poor, so on goes the MP3s (lappie, and one of those cassette adaptor thingies with the cable that you use for portable CD players in cars).

    7. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 1
      uh, people who want traffic reports? People who want to listen to the news or weather?

      Those are people who listen to AM, not FM. I'm pretty sure this doesn't work with AM.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    8. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by NSash · · Score: 3, Informative

      The parent is completely out of touch with mainstream society. "Who actually listens to the radio anymore?!" I guess the record labels can stop paying Top 40 stations to play their crap, seeing as how no one listens to them. I guess all those rap stations my friends listen to can fold, since their only remaining membership is luddites.

      Yes, MP3 players are getting cheaper, but an iPod is sill $200, and every car built in the last 30 years has an AM/FM radio. Aside from just the weather, the news, and talk shows -- streaming, time sensitive content -- the radio offers the opportunity to hear new music.

      You might disagree about the benifits of radio, but the fact is that most people don't own an MP3 player, and most of those who do still listen to the radio. "Who still listens to the radio?" On the freeway, the vast majority of people.

    9. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

      uuum... If I want the traffic report, or news or weather, would I be interested in corresponding commercials on those billboards anyhow? Is it just me, or does anyone else fail to see the connection between commercial behavior and afore mentioned radio listeners...

      --
      -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    10. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but around here (Cincinnati), FM stations do have traffic and weather during commute time. Besides, I listen to NPR news in the morning. NPR isn't on very many AM stations.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    11. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Most of the stations, both AM and FM, in my market, Detroit, have weather and regular traffic reports.

      Maybe if you live in the boondocks then FM stations may not do reports, but I suspect just about any large market onesthat have been around for a while do...

    12. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      That just reminded me of how different football (soccer to me) is outside the US. Our football is all about advertising and TV timeouts. I'd probably go nuts if somebody didn't interrupt the football game to tell me how cheap I can get the latest whatever at the nearest wherever.

    13. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by spiny · · Score: 1

      wow! you can predict traffic jams and auto accidents?

      do tell ....

      --

      Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
      Leela: No he didn't.
    14. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the FM radio part of it, but Cincinnati has the first (and only, so far) billboard I have seen that is a full billboard-sized color screen (it must be one of those screens like they use at the new Pro Stadiums). It is on Southbound I-71 just a few miles before you hit downtown. I have seen it the last few trips between Erie, PA and Louisville, so it has been there at least 6 months to a year (I don't remember when I first saw it).
      This billboard screen could work with a radio sensing system, but with 4 lanes of Southbound traffic, it would have to pick ads based off of what the system judged to be the most popular station at the moment or it would go nuts changing ads. I would think any system like this would have to do some kind of station averaging for it to have any value (to the advertiser) in any location where there is any sort of heavy traffic.


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    15. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      "I don't know about the FM radio part of it, but Cincinnati has the first (and only, so far) billboard I have seen that is a full billboard-sized color screen"

      Ever drive past that puppy at night? I swear, if its after dark and I am heading south past Dana Ave, I grab my shades.

      That thing is DANGEROUSLY bright at night. I would *think* (that would be dangerous in Cincinnati) that it would have some type of ambient light detection on it so that it dims itself, but if it does, its not working.

      Its not quite as obnoxious as the one north of town, up around exit 50 on 71, by the roberts center, but its close.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    16. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by mshiltonj · · Score: 1
      Auto mp3 players are under $150, who actually listens to the radio anymore?

      uh, people who want traffic reports? People who want to listen to the news or weather

      And people who want 10 minutes of commercials for every 8 minutes of music. And for people who like to listen to "morning personalities" engage in forced banter, lame call-in contests and laugh like they've been sniffing nitrious oxide.

      No thanks.
    17. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people who want 10 minutes of commercials for every 8 minutes of music. And for people who like to listen to "morning personalities" engage in forced banter, lame call-in contests and laugh like they've been sniffing nitrious oxide.

      No thanks.


      Thanks for deciding this for everyone.

      You know it's people like you that make the average guys life just a little bit worse everyday.

    18. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      I forgot about the Roberts center -- was too busy watching SUVs go into the median around there last night (was coming back from my Sister-in-law's graduation and there were icy spots between Columbus and Cinci). I suppose they need the brightness so that the signs are visable during the day, but surely they could dim them a little at night - especially Roberts. You can see that sucker several miles away.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    19. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I listen to XM radio. I know when the traffic reports are broadcast on AM, so I listen to AM just long enough to get the report and switch right back over to XM. FM radio? What's that?

    20. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      I get my traffic reports via ham radio. There is a guy in Troy who runs what is called the Capital District Commuter Net every weekday. He collects traffic reports from fellow hams, and disseminates them on request. Best part is, you don't need to be a ham operator to hear the report. Any radio that can receive 146.94MHz will let you participate vicariously.

      Similarly, the same radio which I use to participate in that will also bring me a weather report by tuning in the NOAA weather station WXL37 on 162.55MHz.

      Hm. I wonder what these billboards will do when they see the only radio active in my car is way out-of-band :-)

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    21. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      the radio offers the opportunity to hear new music.
      Obviously, this is a usage of the word "new" with which I was not previously familiar.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    22. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by astrawinski · · Score: 1

      Depends on your prospective, I suppose. Every person I work with has an mp3 player. I'm an adult, as are my co workers. We all use CD players and rarely ever listen to the radio. I ride a motorcycle, so I get traffic and weather before I leave for work.

      Trying to get a radio working on a motorcycle is futile, unless you don't mind looking at an antenna mounted somewhere (shiver). Even then, who wants an ugly radio mounted somewhere (Goldwing owners notwhithstanding)? My bike vibrates quite a lot, and the ride is pretty rough (it's a custom) so using a CD player is out for the most part. A portable mp3 player is a cool way for me to listen to my tunes while on the scoot.

    23. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Indeed, the sport of American Football was tailor-made for tv broadcasting, with plenty of pauses for commercial spots in the game, and the season culminating with one of the greatest marketing extravaganzas of the year (the Superbowl).

      I can't stand the sport myself, would rather watch Baseball, Hockey, Rugby, Tennis, Golf, Curling, Bowling, Celebrity Poker, Synchronized Swimming, pretty much anything rather than American Football. It's simply too boring. A brief moment of action followed by 10 minutes of waiting. Rinse, later, repeat. Now Canadian Football, there's a sport! :)

    24. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this is a usage of the word "new" with which I was not previously familiar

      It's the same type of NEW as used in the "New Testament"

    25. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by unitron · · Score: 1

      There's no reason that this can't work with either AM or FM or both, as long as the radio being detected adhered to the industry standards of an Intermediate Frequency of 455 kHz for AM and 10.7 mHz for FM. You would need one circuit to detect the local oscillator of AM radios and another to detect the local oscillator of FM radios and a third circuit to detect which of the first two was picking up a signal at any given time, and after that it'd be pretty much the same as an AM snooping only or FM snooping only system.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    26. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by unitron · · Score: 1

      If the only radio active in your car is way out of band then most likely your local oscillator will be running at a frequency too far removed from the frequency band to which these things are sensitive, and they'll probably show you an ad for something they think will sell to people without a car radio or who choose not to listen to their car's radio.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    27. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      And often, it's a novel use of the word "music" as well.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    28. Re:Welcome to 10 years ago ... by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      It's not easy to hear new music if all you do is listen to MP3s of CDs you legally own...

  4. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... how saucy those billboards would become if there was a Playboy radio channel!

    1. Re:Imagine... by Ledge · · Score: 1

      There is.....but it's on XM.

      --
      If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
  5. This would be funny if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny


    They made them find out what satilite TV station you were watching in your car, and put on an ad for that.

    I'd drive around all day watching porn ;)

    1. Re:This would be funny if by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Using TEMPEST technology, that can be possible!

      No wait, that's if they want to watch what you're watching.

  6. Hacks? by AbbyNormal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally a way to get back at all of those stupid SUV driver!

    Stuck in bumper to bumper traffic...SUV cuts you off.

    Broadcast message to billboard: "Man in Silver SUV with license plate 12345 has no pants on, is currently drinking, and likes to beat small puppies".

    --
    Sig it.
    1. Re:Hacks? by four2five · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yes....that's the most just thing I've heard in ages. You need to contact your congress[man|woman] and get them to look into that.

      --
      -or so you'd think
    2. Re:Hacks? by jhigh · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the problem with SUV drivers again?

      --
      Social Engineering Expert: Because there is no patch for stupidity.
    3. Re:Hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      They're a bunch of arrogant assholes with small penises that they're trying to compensate for with their oversized, gas-guzzling vehicles that they use to intimidate everyone around them.

    4. Re:Hacks? by jhigh · · Score: 1

      Nothing like stereotyping an entire segment of the population. Rather close-minded don't you think? And what do YOU drive?

      --
      Social Engineering Expert: Because there is no patch for stupidity.
    5. Re:Hacks? by filmsmith · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the AC, but I drive an efficient Saturn and was almost broadsided this morning by some woman who was not only driving too fast in her Gas Hog of an SUV, but also didn't bother to pay attention to the road stripes. Her desire to change lanes in the middle of an intersection (turning right, we were!) almost caused her to pay me as much as her car cost in medical bills (maybe I'm exagerating here...).

      The point is, they seem to have little regard for people in 'smaller' cars and most don't even have a NEED for these monsters. 'No Blood for Oil!' cry the people, yet so few focus their effort on the 'Oil' half of that battle cry. I'm not saying a war for oil is just, I'm just saying there should be two fronts, not just the one against the government. And the first to be under sights should be the Gas Hogs known as SUV.

      fs

      p.s. But that is just my humble opinion.

    6. Re:Hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On the whole, the other AC is right . . . most of the selfish, arrogant drivers that cut people off close, pass in the exit lanes, tailgate, etc. etc. are in SUVs. This is based on many, many hours of observation in a major metro area.

      Of course, there are exceptions.

      Now, would you like to attempt to justify the daily driving of a gigantic road menace that's generally a hazard to all normal cars around, and when taken on the aggregate vastly increases U.S. dependence on foreign oil? I'm all ears.

      And anyway, what does it matter what the AC drives? Why even ask?

    7. Re:Hacks? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Now, would you like to attempt to justify the daily driving of a gigantic road menace"

      You know, one of the nice things about living in the US is NOT having to justify why you buy or drive a certain car. Your free to do so, as long as it is legal.

      I don't drive a SUV...I drive a gas guzzling German sports car....SUV's annoy me in that I have a hard time seeing around them, but, I don't think anyone has to justify what they like. You may not like it...and I would argue you have some valid complaints, but, as long as its legal, no one should have to explain their tastes or choices. If someone can afford it...more power to them.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      as long as its legal, no one should have to explain their tastes or choices. If someone can afford it...more power to them.


      So, I take it you don't mind if I buy a couple senators?

      -- Jack Valenti

    9. Re:Hacks? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Hmm sounds like someone is attempting to compensate for something himself. Crist bad drivers are everywhere, they can be driving 5 Series BMW's, Honda Civic's or Ford Expidition's it really doesn't matter. My experience is there isn't one group of cars that are any worse or any better.

    10. Re:Hacks? by micromoog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You pretty much summed it up . . . the US is all about doing whatever I want, regardless of how it affects other people, 'cause it's my RIGHT, goddammit, my RIGHT!

      Other examples of this mode of thinking in action:

      • telemarketing/spam
      • frivolous lawsuits
      • owning slaves

      There's more to morality than the law. There's more to life than fulfilling your own small selfish desires. But it's your right to think otherwise.

    11. Re:Hacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=14839

    12. Re:Hacks? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm having pretty much fun with life. I figure you only get one shot at it...

      I see so many people who are so worried about this and that....and I'm thinking they're wasting their life...in the end, what will they have done, really? And to not have enjoyed the one shot you get at it?

      As far as legal stuff...yup, I think we need tort reform. And, last I looked owning slaves was illegal. And it was not only the US that has slavery...it was big business way before we became a country, and was practiced in just about any country you could name today....

      And...just out of curiosity, what is there to life besides "fulfilling your own small selfish desires"? I'd love some examples...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Hacks? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      You don't have to justify yourself, but you still should be able to if pressed.

      Yes, "I get more pleasure out of it" is a valid reason, (perhaps, ultimately, the only reason for doing anything) but you should (1) make sure it's best in the long term and (2) make sure it doesn't harm others all that much, because then people might feel compelled to kick your ass, and that would lower your longterm joy.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    14. Re:Hacks? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      The point is, they seem to have little regard for people in 'smaller' cars and most don't even have a NEED for these monsters.

      That's a gross generalization. Yes, I'm sure you notice them more since they have big vehicles. But I've personally seen just as many--if not more--bad drivers driving smaller cars than SUVs. But when they do it you just honk your horn and flip them off and forget about it. When it happens with an SUV all the sudden it's some crusade.

      They're just bad drivers that have big cars. Keep it in perspective.

    15. Re:Hacks? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      I've personally seen just as many--if not more--bad drivers driving smaller cars than SUVs. But when they do it you just honk your horn and flip them off and forget about it. When it happens with an SUV all the sudden it's some crusade.

      Yes but when a bad driver in a small car hits you it results in whiplash and some minor damage. When a bad driver in an SUV hits you it results in your car being crushed and your body parts spread over the road.

      Which would you prefer?

      Of course you could protect yourself by driving an SUV, but this will prompt the bad driver to buy a tank, you know because they need the extra boot space for their golf clubs.

    16. Re:Hacks? by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of them that I've come in contact with (thankfully not physical contact, or else I'd likely not be here to talk about it) drive like they're still driving the family car they used to own. They often tailgate, apparently not realizing that it takes significantly longer to stop one of those land yachts than it does a normal sized car. While they might be able to see greater distances due to being so high up, they often can't see what's right next to them as they change lanes (usually without turn signals; do SUVs even come equipped with them anymore?).

      SUVs are marketed to appeal to agressive drivers, which means that bad drivers often drive them. I can't count the number of times my medium-sized Acura has nearly been run off the road or completely wiped out by one.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  7. Schism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Smart Billboards, Dumb Advertising.

    1. Re:Schism. by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dumb Advertising...

      1. Advertising is dumb.
      2. Advertising works.
      3. Marketers use adverstisements that appeal to the most people.

      Conclusion: most people are dumb.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:Schism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What idiot modded this "funny"? It's clearly "insightful"!

    3. Re:Schism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good call!

    4. Re:Schism. by eaolson · · Score: 1
      Dumb Advertising...
      1. Advertising is dumb.
      2. Advertising works.
      3. Marketers use adverstisements that appeal to the most people.
      Conclusion: most people are dumb.
      If I may edit your comment ever so slightly...
      1. Advertising is dumb.
      2. Advertisers claim that advertising works.
      3. Marketers use adverstisements that appeal to the most people.

      I'm starting to think that the nearly non-stop, frenetic rate at which I'm exposed to advertising is having a negative effect. I tune it out like nothing else, work out technological ways to avoid it as much as possible, and am annoyed by that gets through.

    5. Re:Schism. by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      That which is funny is usually humerous because it has some amount of truth to it. Consider "Funny" to be a subset of "Insightful."

    6. Re:Schism. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Signs, signs, everywhere signs.... so we just start ignoring them. I agree with you 100%.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  8. The google link by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. If my radio.. by kautilya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Umm..if my radio isn't on will I get a message.."Switch on your radio stupid moron! I am not getting any signal. I gotta play some ad for you"

    1. Re:If my radio.. by Lanoitarus · · Score: 1

      Maybe it will assume youre playing a CD and hit you up with some Tower Records ads...

  10. Changing stations quickly, by John+Courtland · · Score: 1, Interesting

    to burn these fuckers out somehow. That would become my new pasttime, if it were possible.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    1. Re:Changing stations quickly, by zeroprime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that if enough people are driving by, it'll happen on its own.

      --
      Hey! come on! try dividing it by anything!
    2. Re:Changing stations quickly, by hazem · · Score: 1

      My guess is the system doesn't actually target individual cars, but gets an aggregate reading from the traffic in general. It may be able to determine that the strength of the signal for 95.5 is twice that of 101.7, so it does twice as many ads for the 95.5 market demographic.

      With that in mind, you could probably build a small transmitter that you could drop nearby the thing and force it into thinking it has a majority of punk-rock or oldies listeners.

  11. High traffic areas... by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just a general Q and O...
    How well would these wok in high traffic areas? I could see something like this in Kansas or some other place where you have time to hit the reciver, change the ad and such, but in a high traffic area?...would it try to pick up if you driving a Ford POS or a Beemer and then chose the ad based on that?

    What if I am listening to Art Bell? Would it show me an ad for the latest book on Shadow Gov? Jim Rome? How to have a take a not suck? Kim Kommando? Your a loser and need to return your computer right now? Top 40? All you $$$ belong to us - The RIAA? (off topic rant I know)

    Seriously, seeing an ever changing sign in a high speed/high traffic zone is an pile-up just begging to happen. I would hope they keep these kind of things in areas where concentration can be peoperly applied to them without the detriment to overall driving situation.

    (This post too sucky to spehl cheq...)

    1. Re:High traffic areas... by Philosinfinity · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have some vision. Let's go about this paragraph by paragraph.
      How well would these wok in high traffic areas? I could see something like this in Kansas or some other place where you have time to hit the reciver, change the ad and such, but in a high traffic area?...would it try to pick up if you driving a Ford POS or a Beemer and then chose the ad based on that?
      Nope, the billboard cannot pick up what type of car you have... at least not until cars emit some sort of RF ID. So here's how it works. I have this billboard that polls all the local traffic that it can poll. After having a demographic created, I can simply tune my add for the one most suited to that demographic. Then, as traffic changes quickly, each billboad is up for a set time (say a minute or 30 sec). Once this time limit has been reached, the billboard polls again. What if I am listening to Art Bell? Would it show me an ad for the latest book on Shadow Gov? Jim Rome? How to have a take a not suck? Kim Kommando? Your a loser and need to return your computer right now? Top 40? All you $$$ belong to us - The RIAA? (off topic rant I know)
      I'm hoping that is nothing more than a joke. Ever notice that during sports games there are a lot of beer and food ads? That's the kind of marketting changes they mean. People who watch certain shows are more likely to buy certain products. Same with radio.
    2. Re:High traffic areas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How to have a take a not suck?

      Is this English?

    3. Re:High traffic areas... by tetranz · · Score: 1

      They must do a spectral analysis of the 'noise' and look for peaks at local oscillator frequencies corresponding to local stations and standard intermediate frequencies.

      Of course that works best in high traffic areas.

  12. not good in rush hour by Savatte · · Score: 1, Interesting

    imagine driving down the street, and the bilboard is getting signals from lots of cars, and practically turns into a strobe light from the constant changing. actually that would be pretty cool, but I could see some epileptics complaining.

    1. Re:not good in rush hour by Gildor · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the article, the billboard analyzes patterns to find out what ads to display at what time of day; it doesn't change for every car that comes down the road:

      "Using the information collected by the Mobiltrak device, Future Ford knows that on weekdays that stretch of I-80 carries a lot of drivers who listen to country-and-western stations, so that's when the dealership advertises the Ford F-150, a popular pickup truck. Evening drivers, Mobiltrak has found, are more apt to listen to talk radio and adult contemporary, so they see ads for Tauruses and Escorts"

    2. Re:not good in rush hour by CriX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, give the engineers a bit more credit. They're not morons. The prospect of a schizophrenic, strobing billboard I'm sure has been considered.

      Just as elevators in tall buildings don't get all flabbergasted and shoot out of the roof, these bill boards should be pretty well behaved too.

      --
      Moderation: +1 pwnage
    3. Re:not good in rush hour by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      Oh, there are worse boards out there, trust me! There's two along the freeway southwest of us. One in particular has attracted a huge number of complaints from motorists and the State Patrol. They can't do anything about it directly, since it's on private land and privately owned, but it has not been for lack of trying.

      The thing is a huge, bidirectional, full-color matrix display that is frequently doing its best to imitate a color TV set. We're talking full-motion ads, in full view of all four lanes of Interstate 5 north and southbound.

      I've never thought of it as anything but an enormous, obnoxious, and exceedingly unnecessary distraction for drivers in a part of the freeway where they definitely do not need distracting. I've made it a point never to recommend, or do business with, any local business that has advertised on that sign.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    4. Re:not good in rush hour by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Just as elevators in tall buildings don't get all flabbergasted and shoot out of the roof..."

      Sigh...another cherished fantasy down the drain :-(

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  13. Hmmm.... by telekon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking before I posted, "What happens when there's bumper-to-bumper traffic; how do you target every car when they move that slowly?"

    But then I got to thinking: could you drop a radio next to the billboard and amp the faint tuning signal, so, say, all the people listening to top 40 see ads targeted toward NPR listeners?

    I guess this is theoretically possible. Funny how every new advertising technology begs the question, "How can I subvert this?"

    --

    To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      Funny how every new advertising technology begs the question, "How can I subvert this?"

      It may *prompt* that question, but it does not beg it. 'Begs the question' != 'prompts one to ask'

      See here

      Yours, the Language Taliban

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by plexxer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was thinking before I posted, "What happens when there's bumper-to-bumper traffic; how do you target every car when they move that slowly?"

      Simple! If it detects traffic moving that slowly, it puts up an ad for the local metrorail system :)

      --
      The government's moral compass is controlled by GPS.
      In times of crises, they alter it to suit their needs.
    3. Re:Hmmm.... by Zwets · · Score: 1
      I was thinking before I posted, ...
      You must be new here!

      (sorry, couldn't resist)

      --
      One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. - Will Duran
    4. Re:Hmmm.... by ()vnorby() · · Score: 1

      Maybe if their was heavy traffic, the system could find the radio station that the most people were listening to at that moment in the range of the ad and display the ad the longest for the largest demographic, then the next largest demographic display the second longest ad and so on.

      --
      -Vib, videogame freelancer for news0r.com, videogame.net, and vnorby.tk
    5. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was thinking before I posted, ...

      You must be new here!

      No, he's not.
      He obviously didn't RTFA.

    6. Re:Hmmm.... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should put up political advertising for the alternative candidates who didn't oppose road widening in the name of 'fighting urban sprawl.'

      Yes, there are powerful bureaucrats in power who actively oppose widening the road where needed, because they want to impose their values on us.

      Those billboards would be a hell of a good time for people who oppose that crap to deliver a message.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    7. Re:Hmmm.... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      which works great as long as the local metrorail system actually works and is on time.

    8. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, we all LOVE 23 lane freeways running through our neighborhoods and forests and such... Just the America I am sure our "forefathers" had envisioned.

      And before you say "Not in My backyard" remember that before the freeways were there it WAS someone's backyard... What happens when that "someone" becomes you, just so that people can get to the mall faster?

    9. Re:Hmmm.... by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      >I was thinking before I posted

      You're new here, aren't you?

      .

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  14. Station Surfing by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The way I station surf - NPR, Rock, Top 40, oldies,.... all in a span of seconds - the billboard would be flickering like disco ball!

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

    1. Re:Station Surfing by zeroprime · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel sorry for their passengers

      --
      Hey! come on! try dividing it by anything!
  15. Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would seem that a particular radio station or advertizer could hack the system and bias the billboard by leaving a box of cheap battery powered FM radios by the side of the road (or a weak FM transmitter). With all those radios tuned to the same station it would fool the billboard into thinking that the cars where tuned to that station. Thus the billboard would leave the same ad up and log high ratings for the station.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Broadcasters wouldn't want to do this because the ads ont he billboards would compete with the ads they play on their stations. The station doesn't own the billboard, Mobiltrak (or some advertising agency) does.

      If the advertising agency charges per impression, then advertisers also would not want to hack the system in this way. They are purchasing for a specific demographic and will have to pay for impressions outside of that demographic. Why not just get a standard still billboard in that case? Why advertise your "tabacco and tabacco accessories" to people listening to Rush Limbaugh when you can just pay for those listening to New Rock.

      --
      -no broken link
    2. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by G4from128k · · Score: 1

      Broadcasters wouldn't want to do this because the ads on the billboards would compete with the ads they play on their stations. The station doesn't own the billboard, Mobiltrak (or some advertising agency) does.

      Good point. But if Mobiltrak data is used for radio station listener rankings, then hacking is good for broadcasters. If a broadcaster (call them K-HACK) looks popular (even by artificial means), then it can charge a higher rate for all of its ads. In fact, the data will inevitably bias advertizer's choice of radio stations, too. If an advertizer finds they are paying for 24 hours of impressions on a billboard because everyone seems to be listening to the K-HACK station, then that advertizer is likely buy radio ads on K-HACK.

      If the advertising agency charges per impression, then advertisers also would not want to hack the system in this way.

      Excellent point! Under most pay-per-impression rate schedules, the advertizer wants a fair system. But your point also suggests that Mobiltrak has an incentive to hack its own system - hacking it to bias results toward the radio station that maximizes display of ads with the highest negotiated per-impression price.

      --
      Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    3. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Why advertise your "tabacco and tabacco accessories" to people listening to Rush Limbaugh when you can just pay for those listening to New Rock.

      For some reason I get the feeling that pipe and pipe tobacco ads would be better targeted at people who listen to Limbuagh's programming than they would to a youth demographic. Pipe smoking is on the rise again. It's a pretty pleasant way to smoke, with significantly fewer risks than cigarettes or cigars. Yes, Prince Albert may again become a phrase referring to something (pipe tobacco) that Grandpa would have understood. (even if the smaller-company regional tobacco brands do taste better.)

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    4. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by radja · · Score: 1

      or maybe I'm just a consumer trying to fuck up business for advertisers... put a radio next to it so it keeps showing the same commercial over and over. everyone gets sick of it, and if you're lucky, the advertised company gets the bill.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    5. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by Hatta · · Score: 1

      But can I spoof it from my car? I don't want to reward the corporations who are stealing our scenery. Should these become common I'll definately have to look into ways to mask the signal from my car.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by Fjord · · Score: 1

      The "tabbacco and tabacco accessory" stores that I have heard advertised have cases and cases of bongs, tshirts with big marijuana leaves on the front, skateboards, and semipronographic bumperstickers as the majority of their stock. I wasn't really talking about a classy tobacconist.

      --
      -no broken link
    7. Re:Broadcaster/Advertizer hacks for this by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I know. I was just being a damned goof. And carrying on because I recently discovered the marvels of pipe smoking.

      I know what a Head Shop is. I used to buy records (and smoking accessories) in them.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  16. Easily corrupted by dheltzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if an enterprising radio station put a powerful radio tuned to their station next to the billboard's receiever?
    Then it would overpower the car radios and make it appear that all the cars are tuned to that station. This would seem like a good thing for that station's marketing department.

    1. Re:Easily corrupted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the companies who advertise on these boards will buy a certain number of seconds their ad will be displayed. I guess the algorithm controlling the board will be designed in a way that all the ads get shown regardless of whether the receiver system works or not.

  17. Thi gives me n idea by supertbone · · Score: 0, Funny

    I am going to through this idea out to the Slashdot crowd.

    I would like a similar device that would allow me to detect radio station frequencies but that would also allow me to broadcast back and that same channel with in a small radius.

    Why would I want that? This way I could tell the motherfucker who cut me just off to go to hell and suck my cock!

  18. I've seen these signs by pantycrickets · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I lived right by the one they had in Roseville, CA. It was extremely bright, annoying, and dangerous seeming. While you are driving down the freeway (especially at night) it was so bright that you couldn't not look at it. Which I'm sure is the point. But when you have thousands of people flying by at 70mph, it just doesn't seem safe.

    1. Re:I've seen these signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      70? You're only doing 70 on 80? Geez, you must have been nearly backended dozens of times ;-)

    2. Re:I've seen these signs by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

      70? You're only doing 70 on 80? Geez, you must have been nearly backended dozens of times ;-)

      Yeah, actually I was thinking of the freeway speeds where I am currently. But you're right. The speed limit there on I-80 is 65MPH, so generally people are going 80MPH. That's even more dangerous.

    3. Re:I've seen these signs by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're allowed to listen to the radio while flying .. doesn't it interefere with the delicate electronics and make you die a horrible horrible flaming death?

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    4. Re:I've seen these signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most pilots are tuned to some radio station at one point of the flight or another (takeoff and landing at a minimum, in the US just about all the time because there is no uncontrolled airspace)...they also broadcast!

  19. easily hackable by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1, Redundant

    just go get a 10$ walkman from radio shack, tune it into your local opera station, place walkman near the billboard... fun? okay, no, not really. but easily hackable it would seem...

    1. Re:easily hackable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about just shoot the fucking box running the billboard, then spraypainting obsceneties on it?

  20. And who pays for this? Seems different. by ianscot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Out of passing (pun intended) curiosity, will this work for anything but the wholly-owned model like the Ford sales lot in the NYT article? I can see that idea -- country listeners want the F150s, the "alternative" station maybe gets the Ford Focus picture. But many companies don't have products for every demographic. Do they just not want to consider this option, then?

    Most billboard business is based on renting the space. If you have to rely on a radio station's demographic to get your ad up there, how would you pro-rate that rental fee? Does the radio station get anything out of it, if you try it that way? And so on. Seems like a substantially different business model could build around this idea -- something "hits"-like.

    (And more importantly, what does this mean for public service announcements? If I'm driving down the road and all the billboards are tailoring themselves to messages about the D.A.R.E. program, am I listening to Rush Limbaugh, or what? How about if all the pictures turn to messages about abortion?)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:And who pays for this? Seems different. by sparkes · · Score: 1

      the "alternative" station maybe gets the Ford Focus picture

      [off-topic bit]
      This is something us brits don't understand, what is alternative about a pretty boring family car?

      I, for one, don't understand why these have taken off among the young in the states. Over here (where they where designed, manufactured in germany I think) they are driven by old folks.

      oh, a little bit of trivia, I developed the software that tested the seat rails in the focus. This is one reason I have for never owning one ;-)
      [/off-topic]

      swinging portable radios on telegraph poles anyone? ;-)

      sparkes

    2. Re:And who pays for this? Seems different. by iainl · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, you weren't the evil being responsible for designing the Focus's light brackets (front and rear, but mainly front). I hate them with a vengeance beyond their mere ugliness, for reasons I don't quite understand.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:And who pays for this? Seems different. by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1
      Welll the ford focus has a few things going for it, its big, but not that big, it is quick, and it doesn't cost too much (well under $25,000) and really it doesn't look that bad, I know in europe you have lots of small cars,a nd this vehicle looks like a big one, but here in the states, this car is small, and has some pick up to it. Also, marketing, frankly I would never own a ford, myself.

    4. Re:And who pays for this? Seems different. by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      the focus is popular among young people because it's CHEAP.

      the ford ka would probably take off here among people who don't want to spend money on a car.

    5. Re:And who pays for this? Seems different. by splattertrousers · · Score: 1
      This is something us brits don't understand, what is alternative about a pretty boring family car?

      I assume the OP was talking about the little tiny Focus, which seems to be the most popular one around here. The other Focii don't seem to be too popular.

      I was in the UK not too long ago, and I had a lot of fun looking at all the different models of cars on the roads. But I was surprised at the number of American cars there. I can kind of understand why some Americans buy American cars, but I don't understand why anyone else would.

    6. Re:And who pays for this? Seems different. by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Because they can't afford to bring in a Jaguar for it's monthly tune-up?

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. People seem to be misunderstanding by jerw134 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This sign doesn't react to what it detects. It simply logs what stations people are listening to, so that the advertiser on the board can look at that info and decide who to target during different parts of the day. It works exactly like Nielsen ratings. The info gets collected and people look at it to make decisions, it's not reacted to immediately.

    1. Re:People seem to be misunderstanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Misunderstanding" seems to imply they actually read the article, which is a rare occurence around here.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Some questions by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can somebody explain in layman term how this works exactly?
    • Why does every radio emit a signal? Is it inefficiency? Is it really every radio or only old ones?
    • Is this signal broadcasted back through your antenna or is this just a faint signal inside your radio and they have really good receivers in their billboards?
    • Has anybody tried to create a radio that doesn't emit this signal?
    • Is this only something with FM radio, or also with AM?
    Thanks for some clarifications.
    1. Re:Some questions by cryptor3 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Why does every radio emit a signal? Is it inefficiency? Is it really every radio or only old ones?

      Your radio has a component in it (an oscillator) that vibrates at the frequency of the station you're listening to. This is "tuning" into the station. This vibration is what emits the signal.

      Is this signal broadcasted back through your antenna or is this just a faint signal inside your radio and they have really good receivers in their billboards? Definitely a result of good receivers in the billboard. Though I think the antenna helps.

      Has anybody tried to create a radio that doesn't emit this signal?

      Not that I know of. I don't think it's really been a major issue worth pursuing in the consumer market. The best way to do it would probably be to shield the box. But since you've got to have an antenna linking the oscillator with the emag signal, you can never completely isolate it.

      Is this only something with FM radio, or also with AM?

      Both AM and FM. You've got to have an oscillator to tune into either one.

    2. Re:Some questions by mellon · · Score: 4, Informative
      Most FM radios use superheterodyne receivers (actually, I'm not sure how true this is anymore, what with software-defined radios, but it certainly has been historically true). There's a pretty good quick explanation of how this works at this site. Look at the text around the first diagram.

      The key is that the frequency of the local oscillator varies, so if you can detect the output of the local oscillator, you can tell to what frequency the radio is tuned. I'm oversimplifying greatly, and the article I've referred to is a pretty rough overview - if you really want to know how this stuff works, you need to do some serious studying. :'}

    3. Re:Some questions by asquared256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A radio has a local oscillator, operating at 10.7 MHz above or below the tuned frequency for FM and 455 kHz (?) above below the tuned frequency for AM. When you mix two frequencies, the two original frequencies, and their sum and difference result. The radio mixes the local oscillator signal with the incoming signal to get 10.7 MHz for FM and 455 kHz for AM. The rest of the circuits in the radio are tuned to that frequency. Actually older radios didn't do this, they just had variable tuning circuits in every stage, necessitating multi-gang variable capacitors and such. I think this system operates by sensing the (frequency - {10.7 MHz,455kHz} ) signals emitted by nearby radios.

    4. Re:Some questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inside radios, signal demodulation is made by mixing received signal to a fixed-frecuency internally generated one. The results are the add and the substract of both signals. The added is discarded, but the substracted is low frecuency enough to get processed and extract the sound.

      All this signals can be detected outside de receiver, and the fixed-frecuency one is widely know, so the dialed can be calculated.

      Old hams knows all this stuff well :)

    5. Re:Some questions by phil+reed · · Score: 1
      Your radio has a component in it (an oscillator) that vibrates at the frequency of the station you're listening to

      One minor nit: the frequency of the oscillator is typically at (frequency of station) minus 10.7 MHz. (For AM, it's (frequency of station) minus 455 KHz.)

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    6. Re:Some questions by persona+9 · · Score: 1
      >Why does every radio emit a signal? Is it inefficiency? Is it really every radio or only old ones?

      >>Your radio has a component in it (an oscillator) that vibrates at the frequency of the station you're listening to. This is "tuning" into the station. This vibration is what emits the signal.

      you can squash this leak by adding a bandpass filter to your radio front end.

      >Is this signal broadcasted back through your antenna or is this just a faint signal inside your radio and they have really good receivers in their billboards?

      >>Definitely a result of good receivers in the billboard. Though I think the antenna helps.

      yea, the RF of your radio's tuning oscillator leaks out and is radiated by your antenna. we used to detect U2 subs that way.

      http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF -8&oe=utf-8&q=HF%2FDF+OR+Huff-Duff&sa=N&tab=wg

      >>Has anybody tried to create a radio that doesn't emit this signal?

      >Not that I know of. I don't think it's really been a major issue worth pursuing in the consumer market. The best way to do it would probably be to shield the box. But since you've got to have an antenna linking the oscillator with the emag signal, you can never completely isolate it.

      again, a few cheap inductors and capacitors will fix this problem, it just saves the manufacture a buck or so per unit. FCC mandates spurious radiation to be below a certain level and if it meets spec. It's approved

      >>Is this only something with FM radio, or also with AM?

      >Both AM and FM. You've got to have an oscillator to tune into either one.

      both AM, and FM, and most any receiver (radar detector detectors work the same way.) Sometimes Hams use their local oscillator to feed a frequency counter and do some simple math to figure exactly what frequency they are receiving on

    7. Re:Some questions by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      FCC mandates spurious radiation to be below a certain level

      Is this (the mining of the LO signals) the electronic equivalent of "dumpster diving?"

      Just a thought.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    8. Re:Some questions by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Most FM radios use superheterodyne receivers (actually, I'm not sure how true this is anymore, what with software-defined radios, but it certainly has been historically true).

      It is absolutely true.

      First, there are not enough software-defined radios out there to make any kind of difference. Most radios on store shelves are still the classic analog model, with the only digital components being the phase-locked loop that lets you get it to exactly the frequency of your favourite station.

      Secondly, with the still-low speed of cheap analog to digital converters (ADC's) that might make their way into a consumer radio receiver, it is likely that superheterodyning will still be used in order to get the frequency down into a range that the ADC can handle. There is probably some room for the actual IF to change, no longer being fixed at 445kHz for AM and 10.2MHz for FM, but the principle will remain.

      It is also noteworthy that the LO (Local Oscillator) frequency is not the same as the frequency of the station received. Instead, it differs from the frequency of the station by the IF--again, either 445kHz for AM or 10.2MHz for FM. It can be either over or under, depending on the design of the radio, but I believe it is over on most radios. For example, listening to 810 AM here in the upstate NY, my radio would produce an LO frequency of 1255. If I had a radio that would tune in that step (instead of skipping over 1255 between 1250 and 1260), I should be able to pick that up if it is placed close enough to another radio tuning in 810.

      Similarly, on FM, if I was listening to 89.1, I should be able to pick up a dead carrier on 99.3. This is all the billboard is really doing.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    9. Re:Some questions by w9wi · · Score: 1

      Actually, frequency+10.7MHz. (and for AM, frequency+455KHz) That keeps down the range of frequencies the oscillator must tune across, as a percentage of the operating frequency. Which makes the oscillator easier to build.

      Besides the jamming plans, you could foil such a system by using a different intermediate frequency, which would cause the oscillator to be on the "wrong" frequency for what the board expects. For example, with a 10.7MHz IF, when tuned to dance music station 102.5 The Party, my oscillator would be on 113.2MHz. If I changed the IF to 9.9MHz, my oscillator would be on 113.2 when I was listening to country station 103.3 KDF. Many car radios already use alternative intermediate frequencies for AM. (for different reasons)

      It *is* possible to build a radio that doesn't use an oscillator at all. Many early (1920s) radios used such circuits. It's far more difficult to build a FM radio with such a circuit but it has been done.

      Sometimes, you can hear other people's oscillators. Tune your car radio to a weak station that's 10.6 or 10.8MHz higher in frequency than a popular local station. Drive in heavy traffic. On occasion, your radio will go silent - the weak station is being swamped by the oscillator in a nearby car.

    10. Re:Some questions by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      What about tuning in software? E.g., GNU radio

  25. My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by aphor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I primarily listen to my iPod using an iRock FM transmitter. Its signal strength is low enough that I fear Billboards may overpower it.

    If I *ever* catch a commercial interrupting the sanctum of my iPod to my car stereo, I will clip the antenna lead and install a loop around the sticky pad where my iPod sits. If that doesn't work, I'll cut radio completely out. I'll get a preamp and amp with a direct connection.

    Who needs radio? I won't go back to radio until there is some kind of cellular packet radio with multicast distribution. Then I could listen to my favorite stations cross country. Even with a 5GB iPod, smart playlists allow you to randomly rotate 2.5 days of continuous uninterrupted no-repeat music from your own collection. Even a 64MB flash based MP3 player will give you 45 minutes to an hour. 256MB is easily one leg of a car trip or a two-way commute.

    In my family, smart billboards would be called "a day late and a dollar short." All it's really worth is a line in the sand drawn by the Ad companies. Flip them the bird!

    --
    --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
    1. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by KirkH · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think that's how it works. The billboard displays an ad, it doesn't hijack your radio station.

    2. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by kalel666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's going to happen is the billboard will sense your iPod playing mp3's and assume you've "stolen" them. A message will then appear telling you to pull over and await your RIAA overlords and cavity search.

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    3. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by aphor · · Score: 1

      I guess I didn't read this carefully enough. I had a kind of big-brother moment there. Thanks for keeping my feet on the ground :)

      What happens if 200 people are in line looking at the billboard doing 65 and everyone is listening to something different? I don't read billboards while listening to good music. I still see radio content changing to accomodate the smart billboards...

      --
      --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
    4. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Parent obviously didn't even read the /. blurb, much less the article.

    5. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mac fags certainly get your panties in a knot over the stupidest things!

    6. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Who needs radio? I won't go back to radio until there is some kind of cellular packet radio with multicast distribution. Then I could listen to my favorite stations cross country.

      Who needs radio? How about people who don't want cross country homogenized ClearChannel radio? For some, this might be a matter of principle--they want to listen to local deejays spin discs with a local flavour. For the rest of us, it's a matter of practicality--I have a passing interest in local news and weather forecasts, and while driving I'm very much interested in local traffic reports.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising, he uses a Mac.

    8. Re:My iPod + iRock = devalued radio (wasted ads) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is not insightful. Mod parent down. Parent either did not RTFA or else has no understanding of how radio works.
      The way an iPod would interact with this is that the billboard would detect that someone's radio is tuned to a band with no station.

  26. hacking the verts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A simple oscillator would be enough to jam the thing to one demographic. I hope they put some up in my area.

  27. Spoofing the billboard by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think these things work by detecing the radiated IF leakage from your radio (an old spy trick). But it also means you could spoof one of these. Just put a leaky battery powered radio right near the billboard.

    this way I could get the bill board to restrict its selection to topics. If my Ad was in that rotation then I probably just improved its visibility five or ten fold. I could sell that to people who place ads.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Spoofing the billboard by tetranz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wouldn't it be getting the local oscillator? That would need to assume a standard I.F. Its many years since I've played much with the internals of radios but are standard I.F's still 455 KHz for AM and 10.7 MHz for FM.

      You're right, it would be easy to screw up.

    2. Re:Spoofing the billboard by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      You're right, it would be easy to screw up.

      Yep, right until the FCC caught you. I'm pretty sure that could be construed as operating a jamming device, which is a felony. Even if it isn't, it's operating an unlicensed transmitter, which still gets you nailed.

      If you do this in your car, they might not care. Mess with advertising dollars, and they will.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:Spoofing the billboard by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the only way they could work. I can tell you from direct experience, though, that any billboards that have this are going to have to have a pretty sensitive receiver and a good antenna system, thanks to how weak that local oscillator signal is. That's going to drive up the cost significantly.

      Another consideration: Do all modern broadcast receivers use the exact same first IF frequency? I can say with confidence that very few 2-way radios do. I've seen a number of cases where even different model series of radios from the same manufacturer will have different IF's. Motorola is a great example of this. I've seen them use 10.700, 14.400, 21.400, 11.245, and 45.000, all depending on what series of radio it was.

      Anyway, getting back to spoofing: It might be amusing to, if one has mobile HF capability, adjust one's HF radio to a frequency other than what the broadcast radio might be putting out and key-down for a few seconds (in AM mode, so you'll put out a real carrier -- SSB would do nothing unless you actually spoke). See if you can fool the silly thing.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    4. Re:Spoofing the billboard by IM6100 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah! I'll just install my antique Atwater Kent tuned-stages radio in my car, which is non-superhetrodyne!

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    5. Re:Spoofing the billboard by IM6100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No it's not. It's operating a regular radio, probably even one that's FCC approved. All radios 'leak' out this form of RF when in use.

      It might be classified as littering if you go dumping radios all around, but nothing the FCC could get you for.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    6. Re:Spoofing the billboard by astrawinski · · Score: 1

      Yep, right until the FCC caught you. I'm pretty sure that could be construed as operating a jamming device, which is a felony. Even if it isn't, it's operating an unlicensed transmitter, which still gets you nailed.

      While I'm not sure about the FCC calling such a device a jamming device, I do know that it could never be called an unlicensed transmitter. All receivers have a Local Oscillator and use Intermediate Frequencies. Having a leaky one in either circuit certainly doesn't make it a transmitter.

      As a matter of fact, I'm not sure that the FCC would really get involved much at all. Since these billboards are just receivers, I can't imagine them paying the FCC licensing fees for anything. Even so, I say wipe the prints off the radio with the leaky IF or LO and hide it in the bushes. Leave it on an NPR station. That'll leave 'em scratching their heads for a few minutes, anyhow.

    7. Re:Spoofing the billboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Just put a leaky battery powered radio right near the billboard."

      You can power a radio with leaky batteries? And I've been buying new ones like a sucker.

    8. Re:Spoofing the billboard by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No it's not. It's operating a regular radio, probably even one that's FCC approved. All radios 'leak' out this form of RF when in use.

      Only superheterodyne tuners do this. Regenerative tuners will do this only if they're improperly adjusted. TRF tuners will never do this. I guess that means it's time to break out the old Atwater Kent...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:Spoofing the billboard by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      any billboards that have this are going to have to have a pretty sensitive receiver and a good antenna system, thanks to how weak that local oscillator signal is. That's going to drive up the cost significantly.

      You mean compared to a 20 by 50 foot Jumbotron display?

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
    10. Re:Spoofing the billboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, just pay some guy standing with his portable radio all day long under the billboard....

    11. Re:Spoofing the billboard by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Almost every radio on the market that's a cheap consumer radio is a superhet. Certainly, if someone cruises the thriftstores and buys all the cheap radios to screw up a billboard system like this, the radio they'll be getting will be a superhet.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  28. "We've mentioned these before." by hype7 · · Score: 4, Funny
    We've mentioned these before.


    Hmm, what's this then? Some kind of new editorial disclaimer to enable double posts? :)

    -- james
    1. Re:"We've mentioned these before." by NSash · · Score: 1

      The article isn't a "double post," it is now a "follow-up." Really.

    2. Re:"We've mentioned these before." by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      We've mentioned these before.

      And we'll mention these again, and again, until you ignorant consumers get it through your thick skull what the next big thing is!

      Did I say that out loud?

    3. Re:"We've mentioned these before." by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      It's called an "update."

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  29. National conglomorate? by garcia · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it display a table of executives slaughtering a baby when you drive buy listening to a ClearChannel or Infinity station? ;)

    1. Re:National conglomorate? by sparkes · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK Clearchannel own most of the billboards not the radio stations.

      If they start taking over radio stations wholesale they have a whole lot of advertisising space to push their wares.

      and now they can selectivly push them on roads where their pentitration is low ;-)

      sparkes

    2. Re:National conglomorate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US they own most of the radio stations AND most of the billboards (they bought out ackerly communications here in the NW for example a few yards back, a major billboard owner) so this is truly a match made in demographic heaven.

  30. This would be funny if-"joy" stick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I'd drive around all day watching porn ;)"

    Now aren't you glad cars can be driven one-handed?

  31. WTF?... by Hayzeus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Back up a little. So these Machines mentioned Before -- they're like Carriages, only without Horses? From whence do they derive their Motive Force -- some kind of Magnetikal Effect? -- Poor Dick

  32. What if the radio is off? by drywater · · Score: 1

    If my radio is off, will the billboard be disabled? I listen to Public Radio more than anything else, does that mean I see buildings for pledge drives all over?

  33. Is this a "problem" that needs a tech fix? by rm007 · · Score: 1

    I know this is /. and everyone is supposed to be predisposed to boxes and gagets etc., but I really have to question whether this product addresses a problem that really requires a technological fix. From what I see in the article and the Mobiltrak website, this localizes advertising content on the basis of the characteristics of road users in a particular area at different times of the day. For the most part, in any large metropolitan area, the advertisers and market researchers already know this, that's how they decide what billboards to put where and how much to charge for them. Presumably this service offers some improvement on existing market research products in terms of timeliness, accuracy and/or cost. Even then, claims about superior targeting of advertising translating into superior results from advertising are not easy to measure in that sort of advertising.

    --


    I've finally got around to changing my sig
  34. Ok.. by hookedup · · Score: 1

    How long can these ads possibly be displayed? I dont know about your town, but in mine, there is tons of traffic, wouldnt these ads be changing quite quickly? Or do they simply take a random 'signal' every so often to determine the ad it's supposed to show.

    1. Re:Ok.. by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      I would say that it takes a sampelling and attempts to determine the most popular at the time eh?

  35. I'm telling ya... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... driving is soon going to be much more hazardous with the advent of new, "Pop-up Billboards".

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    1. Re:I'm telling ya... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remind me to get a stronger bumper.

      Could be fun to run over the pop-ups ;)

  36. What Billboards? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

    I don't know what its like everywhere, but in the Washington DC metro area there aren't too many billbords. Zoning has eliminated them as "visual polution". I know of a few up along I-95 in Baltimore, but I can't say that billboards are too common along my drives.

    Would have been a great idea 40 years ago, though...

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
    1. Re:What Billboards? by splattertrousers · · Score: 1
      I don't know what its like everywhere, but in the Washington DC metro area there aren't too many billbords

      You are lucky. There are billboards all over the US. I've driven across the country a few times and you can't escape them.

    2. Re:What Billboards? by jason0000042 · · Score: 1
      I don't know what its like everywhere, but in the Washington DC metro area there aren't too many billbords

      You are lucky. There are billboards all over the US. I've driven across the country a few times and you can't escape them.
      As an emigree from the DC metro area I just have to say, the lack of billboards does not make up for having to live in the DC metro area. <emoticon>
      --
      i don't like my old sig.
    3. Re:What Billboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I've found billboards while driving on major interstates that aren't used by commuters to be way more entertaining than most of the stuff we're talking about here - you know, South of the Border, Kids! Start Screaming for the next 10 miles!

      Or Jesse James and his wild west show! Or my favorite, all the billboards on the approach from the east into Amarillo - 120 Oz. Steaks, eat it all, and it's free!

      C'mon. That's they way it's meant to be. =)

    4. Re:What Billboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad billboards are illegal in my home state, Maine. :-D

  37. Let me get this straight by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny
    I have to have a foil wallet to keep my EZ-Pass and credit cards from finking on me, an RFID jammer for my clothing tags, turn my cell phone off to keep from being tracked with the 911 locator, the FBI can use my OnStar to listen to conversations in the car and now I have to have a billboard jammer to keep everyone on the planet from knowing what radio station I listen to?

    Being paranoid is getting to be more work all the time.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Let me get this straight by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

      You could just live in a faraday cage ...

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can still track you even if the phone is off.

    3. Re:Let me get this straight by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      on the contrary, being paranoid is getting easier all the time; there are more reasons for it and the reasons are more explicit. what's more work is REMAINING CALM!

  38. Radio evangelists by Hieremias · · Score: 1

    This would work great down in the bible belt. Every time it detects someone listening to a radio evangelist, it could flash big letters "SEND MONEY" with a 1-800 number.

  39. Feh! by Asprin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  40. finally -- technology comes through by dandelion_wine · · Score: 2, Funny

    I been waiting for a sign that'll fix me up with a tuba-playin girl.

    Hello, this is Harris. I'm in right now, so you can talk to me personally. Please start talking at the sound of the beep

  41. It's Minority Report come true! by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    And Tom Cruise ignored the ads too. I was thinking the other day; I'm not sure I've ever bought *anything* on the basis of an advert. However, I've avoided certain products and services because I find their ads so incredibly annoying.

    Once we have finally achieved wall-to-wall adverts on every possible medium - and we're nearly there - the backlash will begin. It's like the PFY who comes up to you in an electrical store and starts trying to sell you stuff...why do I always want to punch him?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:It's Minority Report come true! by Fjord · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the other day; I'm not sure I've ever bought *anything* on the basis of an advert.

      It's impossible to know if you have. Adverts can influence you in indirect ways, such as a friend seeing one and trying a product and then recommending it to you. An advertisement can also bring a familiarity of a product to you, so that when you are in a grocery store and you are looking at many similar products, you would grab one that was advertised in your past (although you are not thinking of the advertisement, just that the name rings a bell).

      I don't understand why people are so admant about not having advertising "effecting them," as if it indicated some weakness of mind. I freely admit that there have been times I'm watching TV and an ad for some fast food place somes on and I'll think "that looks good, and I haven't been there in a while, I think I'll have that tonight." Food is probably the number one advertising that influences my decisions directly. I also will look at coupon I get in the mail to see if there are deals on things I need anyway. I feel it's financially irresponsible to not do that.

      --
      -no broken link
  42. XM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, what about when the driver is listening to XM or Sirius radio? Or what if we're listening to a cd or something? I never listen to the local radio anymore.

    1. Re:XM? by Phreakiture · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it will probably not react to XM or Sirius radios, unless you are using a modulator with it (to listen over an FM station preset in your car) in which case it will read garbage.

      That last statement probably needs more elucidation. If you have your sirius/XM radio being rebroadcast on, say, 99.3, then the billboard will detect your LO at 99.3+10.2=109.5 and correctly conclude that you are listening to a radio tuned to 99.3, and it may also detect the modulator's carrier at 99.3, and conclude that you are listening to 99.3-10.2=89.1. If there are stations on neither of these frequencies, it won't be able to make any sense of it.

      As a practical matter, you shouldn't set your modulator to the frequency of an existing local station, as you will probably not get very good audio.

      On the other hand, XM and Sirius have the potential to sell info, since the radio is entirely under their control. That is not to say that current models transmit this info, but since ALL models are manufactured under supervision/license, future models may have the capacity to store/retrieve/forward that info.

      Then we would have a Sirius problem :-)

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  43. another reason by rakanishu · · Score: 1

    not to listen to radio.

    Sounds like something out of Minority Report.

    1. Re:another reason by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Turning off the radio sure beats gouging out yours eyes, that's for sure.

    2. Re:another reason by jason0000042 · · Score: 1
      Turning off the radio sure beats gouging out yours eyes, that's for sure.

      More useful would be popping the ear drums, but I take your point. It consistently amazes me that people still listen to the radio at all.

      For that matter, it amazes me that people look at billboards. I can drive by a hundred of billboards and not know what any of them said. This is, I feel, not impressive. It is just an essential survival skill for living in modern america.

      --
      i don't like my old sig.
  44. Shades of Minority Report by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

    "Mr. Anderton, you look like you could use a Guinness right about now!"

    "John, how about a nice relaxing vacation in the Carribbean?"

  45. NPR Billboard: by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    NPR listeners will be presented with a blank billboard, as they prefer to donate rather than support advertisers.

    (I'm a rabid, die-hard NPR listener myself)

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  46. Another problem with these by UrGeek · · Score: 1

    "Minority Report" advestisers (maybe call it Mind Spam?) is if you trash these devices, they know who you are and can call 911 and report you.

    Never to get a hold of your dean's subcuteanous transpoder and clone it.

  47. OT: low tech spam on Mexican beach by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Advertising everywhere, all the time, reminded me of my experience at a Mexican beach last week. While a sitting on the beach admiring the natural and human scenery, hundreds of [ licensed ] vendors walk by every few seconds pushing everything from blankets, artwork, tatoos, food, sexual partners, etc. 99.9% of the interactions are "not interested", but they keep on coming all day. Its much like the MS TV commercial why the Blubberfly boots the salesmen.

    1. Re:OT: low tech spam on Mexican beach by barakn · · Score: 1

      but its nice when you don't have to get off your ass to buy a cigar...

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  48. Dumb idea by dar · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the kind of idea that sounds cool on the surface, but can't really work out irl.

    How many billboards have you driven past lately where you were the only one around in a car?

    Even if it does some kind of averaging. What, you're going to average Howard Stern and NPR? Is the result going to be better than the vanilla demographic they have for that area anyway?

    --
    My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
  49. Threshold breaking drivers by MisterMook · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder what would happen if you designed your "leaky radio" signal on purpose to appear from multiple car radios. Maybe a career of driving in rush hour traffic for some unlucky bastard? Guys driving around town with special getups designed to break the threshold levels of the billboards and turn the adverts to their employer's ads? Ick. It sounds about as fun as artifically inseminating sheep for a living.

  50. Not quite right by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are almost right, but not quite.

    The way a modern superheterodyne radio works is like this:

    You want to listen to a radio frequency at F1.
    The radio creates a local oscillator (or LO) frequency of F2, such that abs(F2-F1) = F3, where F3 is a fixed, intermediate frequency (or IF). A common IF for FM radios is 10.7 MHz, and a common IF for AM radios is 455 kHz. By pulling the signal to a fixed frequency the rest of the radio's design can be better optimized and simpler.

    Now, F2 can be either F1+F3 or F1-F3, it make little difference. So one way to confuse the system would be to retune the radio so that it uses "the other IF" - i.e. if the radio is using F2=F3+F1, retune the guts so that it uses F2=F1-F3.

    Alternatively, replace the IF strip to change F2, and then retune the radio appropriately - if the sign's systems assume an IF of 10.7 MHz, and you are using an IF of 9.7 MHz, that will confuse the sign. The difficulty there is getting components designed for a non-standard frequency. If the radio is using the old "tuned slug" design this isn't so bad, but if the radio is using a crystal filter you are looking at custom crystals.

    However, there is no need for the LO to be coupled to the world - the first stages of the radio can amplify the RF and decouple the first LO mixer from the world. It just takes a bit more work on the sheilding of the radio - you use a milled block of aluminum rather than foil sheilds. I know, since that is what I do for a living - design radios (well, radio test gear, which is a special case of the class Radio)

    However, building a jamming oscillator at the needed frequencies to scramble this sign, while completely illegal, is also trivial - buy a cheap FM transmitter kit and retune it slightly. Of course, by causing interference you are in violation of FCC part 15 rules, and will get nailed if you get caught, so don't, 'mkay?

    If it bothers you, just don't listen to the radio.

    1. Re:Not quite right by orn · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      I'd like to play around with this. I'm an electrical engineer, so I know my anode from my cathode, but I don't know much about RF design beyond the basics.

      So, say I want to find someone's LO frequencies. It seems like you need an antennae tuned to about the LO that you expect to find. What kind of general purpose solution is there that will cover most of the bases? A spectrum analyzer plus an antennae, but is that really the best solution? And what kind of antennae will give me the best cross spectrum support?

      Okay, now how about the targeted solution. I now know the particular LO that I'm looking for, what's the best design to be able to pick up the signal? Finally, what if I want to determine where the signal is coming from... where do I find DF designs?

      Thanks!

      --
      1. 2.
    2. Re:Not quite right by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Well, first I'd point you at the Amateur Radio Relay Leagues's website - www.arrl.org.

      That said:

      You need to lock the problem in a bit more. If you are just looking for FM radio LO's, you'd be looking in the range of about 70-125 MHz (assuming 10.7 MHz IF, high and low side injection).

      For an omnidirectional antenna, you'd be looking at a discone. For a directional antenna, that wide, you'd probably want to use a log-periodic as a yagi would be too narrow band.

      Then, if you are looking for signals, a sensitive spectrum analyzer or communications service monitor - I'd suggest looking for a used IFR-1200S, IFR-1200Super, or IFR-COM-120B, but I'm biased as hell since I helped design the 120B. Check eBay (gag). Don't buy a 1200 dash-nothing or 1200-a - it does not have the spectrum analyzer in it. If you can find a 1200SRA that would be even better, but I don't think No Such Agency has given those up.

      For DF work - IF you get a strong enough signal, then you can use something like a Ramsey electronics kit DF rig. You can also look up Fox hunting for more information.

      Simplest way to scratch that itch - Get a ham ticket, find your nearest club, and sit at the feet of the Elmers.

    3. Re:Not quite right by Mooncaller · · Score: 1

      Do you guys need a Test Software Developer or Test Engineer? I spent the last six years developing test software, test processes, and test executives for RF/MW spectrum analyzer products at Agilent/HP. This includes Test Development enviroments. To bad Agilent has decided to self destruct!

    4. Re:Not quite right by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      All I can say is, send in your CV to our HR department.

      http://www.aeroflex.com/aboutus/employment/jobs. cf m

      Personally, ***I'D*** like to see some more Test guys, to help write autotests.

      But I don't hire people.

  51. Defeating the purpose... by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

    this way I could get the bill board to restrict its selection to topics. If my Ad was in that rotation then I probably just improved its visibility five or ten fold. I could sell that to people who place ads.

    Yeah, and you "improved" your marketing expenses five to tenfold. Ads are charged by exposion - radio and TV ads by the (expected) number of viewers/listeners, outdoor ads according to how many it is estimated will pass by. That's how Times Square is more expensive than Hwy 149, Beaumont, Texas - surely the point of these new billboards is to charge relatively more per exposion, but level it out on serveral ads, thus increasing the total income from the board.

    What you COULD do, however, is to tune your leaky radio to the local conservative channel, and sit and watch the money flow out of Bush's campaign funds...

  52. And I have the right by panxerox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    to put a 5 dollar solar powered transmitter 20 feet from the billboard dialed to the classical station.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  53. hrmmm by POds · · Score: 1

    doesnt the melboure yarra river tunnel have this or something similar?

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  54. What next? On-the-fly MRI Brain scans? by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    If they are able to scan your brain as you drive towards the billboard, they could possible determine something about you, and use that to select custom advertising for you....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  55. Neuros FM transmitter by Greg+W. · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, what will the billboard think when it not only gets the news that I'm listening to a radio station that doesn't really exist (91.9MHz), but also gets blasted by the 91.9MHz FM signal my car's emitting? Will they use Tuneprint to figure out what song is playing? Will they simply categorize me as "geek" and display ads for computer stuff?

    Nah, they'll probably be too stupid for that. They'll probably think "Wow, this guy's listening to bumfuck cornfield radio!" or whatever the 91.9MHz station is that sometimes leaks through and interferes with my music. I'll probably get ads for Bibles or manure.

    Exception: I listen to a college radio station show on Thursday afternoons: Guerrilla Radio, on WRUW 91.1 FM, 1630-1730 Thursdays. Unless I forget.

    1. Re:Neuros FM transmitter by splattertrousers · · Score: 1

      Heh, I wonder what ads they will show if everyone driving by is listening to a non-existant station because they are all broadcasting their mp3 players to their radios.

      (Perhaps they'll show ads for car stereos with auxiliary input jacks...)

    2. Re:Neuros FM transmitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll probably get ads for Bibles or manure.

      There's a difference?

    3. Re:Neuros FM transmitter by log0 · · Score: 1
      There's a difference?

      Sure there is.

      Manure = shit
      Bible = bull shit

      So you could say that a bible is manure but you couldn't say manure is a bible.
  56. All your billboard are belong to us by Man+of+E · · Score: 0

    We get radio signal,
    billboard screen turn on.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig
  57. What would be interesting... by ()vnorby() · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What would be interesting are billboards that send out ads. For example, you are driving by a heineken ad, and it says on it "tune your radio to 89.7" or something like that and you could listen to the ad that went along with the billboard. Might be useful if you wanted more information about an the subject of the billboard. Kind of like a drive-by movie theater where when you are in the right range, you can hear the movie audio.

    --
    -Vib, videogame freelancer for news0r.com, videogame.net, and vnorby.tk
    1. Re:What would be interesting... by Maresi · · Score: 1

      Argh!

      Imagine you drive through Utah, thousands and thousends of mor(m)onic ads along your way!

      And your radio keeps saying "Please tune your radio to 88.8, the bible radio"

      Id rather listen Britney than THAT (ugh, what a hellish imagination!)

      NO!

      Dont even think that!!!!!

      --
      The checkbox said "Requires Windows 98, NT, or better. And so I installed Linux
    2. Re:What would be interesting... by ()vnorby() · · Score: 1

      Your right, if the radio "keeps saying 'Please tune your radio to 88.8, the bible radio'", but I mean text on the billboard that says "tune your radio to 88.8" you can simply ignore it, or, if you are interested, tune in.

      --
      -Vib, videogame freelancer for news0r.com, videogame.net, and vnorby.tk
  58. Ok class, can you say HERF? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I have a HERF gun that will fix this...

  59. iPod price by elcid73 · · Score: 1

    iPods retail for $299 (us) in their cheapest form. I you can tell me where to get one (other than eBay) for 200, do tell.

    1. Re:iPod price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just get an archos

  60. Re:We've mentioned these before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just thought we might discuss the tech this time last time the posting went a little something like this. Of course you might think I was trying to get this started again, but I wasn't. I was just pointing out the nature of Slashdot.

    When we last left our heros they were saying........

    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:2, Offtopic)
    by Twirlip of the Mists (615030) on Sunday November 24, @09:48PM (#4747951)
    (Last Journal: Friday April 04, @02:24PM)
    havent you noticed Dubya's war on Iraq is about what Iraq might do

    Sound defense policy is always based on capability, not intention. You can't read the enemy's mind, so you have to act on what he could do if so inclined. Any student-- even an armchair student-- of military history can tell you this.

    If it reaches a point where the possibility that an enemy might act becomes sufficiently real, and the danger posed by that enemy's capabilities become sufficiently great, then the only reasonable course of action is to respond with military force. To do anything less is to... well, is to be Poland circa 1939.

    If, on the other hand, you feel okay about the thought of another Pearl Harbor-- one involving nuclear or chemical weapons-- then carry on.
    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:2, Insightful)
    by cperciva (102828) on Sunday November 24, @09:55PM (#4747992)
    (http://www.daemonology.net/)
    If it reaches a point where the possibility that an enemy might act becomes sufficiently real, and the danger posed by that enemy's capabilities become sufficiently great, then the only reasonable course of action is to respond with military force.

    In that case, it's time for the rest of the world to declare war on the United States of America.
    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:2, Insightful)
    by marsonist (629054) on Sunday November 24, @11:23PM (#4748519)
    I equate it as such. If a formerly convicted criminal, on parole, is running down the street pointing weapons at police officers, must the officers wait until the trigger is pulled to respond, or should common sense be used. This is the situation we are in with Iraq. We have seen his past actions and know that he cannot be trusted. There are many who feel that any potential threat from Sadam could be dealt with via international political pressure. The U.N. has been trying this for over 10 years, with the only result being the suffering of Iraqi people. There are only so many ways to appoach such a situation with most options having been already axhausted.
    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:2)
    by Twirlip of the Mists (615030) on Monday November 25, @12:05AM (#4748722)
    (Last Journal: Friday April 04, @02:24PM)
    Best analogy ever. You, sir, kick ass.
    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:1)
    by sydlexic (563791) on Monday November 25, @01:18AM (#4749064)
    If someone is running down the street pointing a gun at you and you have time to figure out it's a formerly convicted criminal, on parole, then you probably have time to figure out a lot of other options, too. You might also be able to figure out that a) the gun isn't loaded and/or b) it's a water gun and/or c) the person isn't pointing the gun at you, but instead at that the big puppeteer standing over you pulling your strings.
    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:2)
    by arivanov (12034) on Monday November 25, @03:26AM (#4749609)
    I somehow do nopt remember Saddam in the war tribunal dock at Hague....

    Or did you mean the specialist in ordering the shooting Afghan weddings and blowing up vehicles on the territorty of friendly states by drones?

    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:2)
    by arivanov (12034) on Monday November 25, @03:22AM (#4749601)
    The moderator who moded this down as troll is a redneck dubia hugging idiot.It is correct, to some extent on topic, in reply to the previous post and exactly what the rest of the world would do if they manifested dubia thinking. Thanks god they do not.
    Re:Minority Report - RUINED (Score:1)
    by martyn s (444964) on Sunday November 2

  61. Random Thoughts by LuYu · · Score: 0

    • This could hurt Top 40 listenership as many people listen to those songs when they think that no one knows what they are listening to.
    • People still listen to radio? I thought it was the dinosaurs. I thought they went exctinct because of radio.
    • What if you are listening to a CD or mp3s? Will newer versions use a laser to pick up vibrations from the windshield? Will they be able to check your credit card records to determine whether or not you have paid for that particular song? "RIAA Sues Motorists"
    • What is the demographic for Britany Spears? Retarded? "K-mart doesn't suck!"
    • I guess Big Brother really is watching me, and those eyes do not seem to follow me. They actually do follow me.
    • Will Big Brother change race for different demographics? Will Big Brother ever be Big Sister? Will Big Sister have a moustache?
    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  62. and content by the corporations by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Informative
    The corporations are steering more of the content as well. Someone in Redmond must have gotten irked by the thought of not having control over the radio content.

    Seriously, what if the majority of riders are listening to truly non-commercial stations like student stations e.g. ones with voice id's like "WCBN 88.3 FM - at the far left of your radio dial" or "Radio Free Ann Arbor". Would the billboard show an ad for a state or city park or a free concert? Or just tell people to bike to work?

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:and content by the corporations by urmensch · · Score: 1

      Probably something like "Vote YES on the greenbelt".

  63. Because the radio isn't full of ads already? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

    So what businees need is this filling? Did the Clearchannel radio execs wake up one morning and realize that 20 minutes of commercials per hour was not enough?

    Coming soon: Revolutionary new smart e-boards create customized, targeted advertising across multiple mediums to provide a fully immersive, multimedia marketing opportunity which responds in real time to complement FM radio advertisement, maximizing penetration to target demographics. Consumers can now receive 2 hours worth of advertisements every hour, and still get fifteen minutes of today's top hits (as determined by a small focus group with vaguely similar demographics to the region I live in) as well, sandwiched between inane local DJ blather intended to make the locals feel like their music is "customized" for their area.

    This just reinforces my tendency to not listen to the radio at all. My car CD player handles mp3 CD's, so I really don't listen to the radio anymore, and on the rare occasion that I do, it gets turned off at the first commercial break (usually less than ten minutes).

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  64. No...please by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1


    Good God! Who cares about the ads for public radio - imagine the hell of pledge week!

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  65. Hey, this could be good! by Oggust · · Score: 1
    What's with all the negativism? This could be really good, if it worked[1]. Think about it, there are no privacy concerns here, the advertiser doesn't know who you are, just what station you're listening to. [2]

    If this can make billboard ads more interesting to me (which is what it's about, really) then I'm all for it.

    /August.
    [1] I have doubts about that though. Problem 1: I don't always listen to something interesting, just whatever tuned in first and wasn't horrible. Problem 2: what if there's lots of cars close by, even on a reasonably full highway they'd have real problems figuring out which car is listening to what and flic the sign at high speeds. And in a gridlock?
    [2] Of course, the guy behind you might figure out which channel you're listening to by watching "your" sign. Big deal...

    --
    "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
  66. I knew it! by subterranean · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the police are using this technology to profile drivers? I have had police cars swing around or drive up close enough to see me when tuned to the local hip hop station. Maybe it's just because I drive a crappy car...

    1. Re:I knew it! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      heh, was the hip hop sound level 120 db at a distance of 10 feet from your car? Playing almost any kind of music with extreme volume will get one checked out by the boys in blue in some neighborhoods.

  67. Next they pick up on RFID tags ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    What did you buy last in the shop ... show some adverts that relate to that so you might buy some more.

    So you just picked up your hot date, and being a health concious sort of guy dropped round the chemist (== pharmacy for US readers) before meeting her - so what gets flashed up on every billboard as you drive her home ?

  68. ? Non-corporate radio ? by lildogie · · Score: 1

    "... and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting ..."

    Have a look at Noam Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent."

    Et tu, NPR, et tu?

  69. Great by discHead · · Score: 1

    And I'm an NPR fan. Just what I need, more ads for Viagra and Sleep Number beds.

  70. My .02 by filmsmith · · Score: 1

    IM6100 already hit the points I was goint to hit, but it also dawned on me that operating a jamming signal would be something the FCC could track down. But $5 radio's from Target? You really think they'll spend the effort tracking them down? There's not a damn thing you can use to identify them with. Sure, you could go around town and see who's been buying up Radios, but at that point you're wasting more money than is neccessary for a petty crime (if, as was pointed out, it is even a crime at all).

    fs

    1. Re:My .02 by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      All the FCC needs to do is classify it as "interference" which the user of the radio is required to correct, by law. Read the Class B electronic device statement on any radio (or other electronics).

      Again, this would probably only be enforced if one advertiser parked a radio near one of these BBs to make sure that their ads got a better rotation, which I believe was the original poster's point.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:My .02 by hedley · · Score: 1


      If I was the billboard designer, I would expect a
      doppler on the receive signal or I won't display the ad. Then you would need at least a moving 5$ Target radio to change the ad. Even rush hour traffic ususally crawls at walking speed so there should be a small doppler component, that would be the signal you collect.

      Hedley

    3. Re:My .02 by filmsmith · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. I'd also expect it to take the average station tuned in and display an ad for that demographic. No need to appeal to us few listening to NPR when the whole rest of the interstate is tuned in to KSUK 108! All POP all the time!

      Though, after all these niceties, it sure does tie up a lot of cash for nothing more than a billboard, no?

      Oh, well. At least there aren't any charities that this money could go to ...!

      fs

    4. Re:My .02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh nope. You just detune the radio to look like a doppler.

  71. What happens if two cars are beside each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....one listens to country and the other rock, will the billboard compromise and show some Rock-a-Billy stuff?

  72. BSOD by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    On,

    A humorous note. Early one Friday morning in L.A. my wife was driving by one of those monster billboards that are essentially big video terminals and it had a BSOD, a bunch of hex/binary/error codes, etc., and a MS logo floating in the lower corner.

    She found it quite humorous.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  73. Oh boy... by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you just paid up quickly the begging season would take less time... :)

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  74. Lovely by Ryosen · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah. I can just see what this is going to be like during rush hour on the New Jersey Turnpike with a thousand cars streaming pass, all tuned to different stations, as the billboard flashes maniacally to keep up and cars careen off the road while thier drivers fall into epilleptic fits.

    As if my commute wasn't difficult enough already.

    --

    Ryosen
    One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
  75. Stupid idea by chadm1967 · · Score: 1

    All the billboards are bad enough, now they want to do this?

    I'm sorry, this is a stupid idea!

  76. Badvertisements by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    I dread the day goatse gets its own radio station...

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  77. how long until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people with rfid tags who are blacklisted will be displayed on the billboards when they pass by, sure, it'd work well for people who were known sex offenders, but the way the FBI has been marking people as terroristic threats because they partake in protest, peaceful or not, even if it's not in this nation.. they get put on a blacklist.
    a nun in colorado (or was it utah?) had a mysterious police record of being a suspected tetrrorist, and this showed up after she attended a peacful protest in mexico.

    and before you grab your tin foil hat, I dont think the government can read your minds. they can just beat that out of you. ;P

  78. Smart billboard? by MainframeKiller · · Score: 1

    No, that's a smart billboard!

    --
    http://www.club977.com/ - The 80's Channel!
    Your source for commercial free 80's music!
  79. The schizos where ahead of their time by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    You know those crazy guys who like to wear tin foil on their heads and say that they are being monitored all of the time? I think they may be right.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  80. Cover your eyes by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to see what they would show on the billboard if they see a lot of Howard Stern listeners driving by.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  81. Privacy by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Privacy issues aside, I'd hate to see ads related to the content I listen to. When I'm not listening to the news, I listen to rock. And believe me, I in no way like or subscribe to the culture that seems to go along with it.

  82. radio? by wobblie · · Score: 1

    What happens if I'm listening to Phil Hendrie?

    Considering the wasteland that radio is, this is hardly good news, in fact, it's way worse than what we have to deal with now.

    They should just do away with billboards altogether, they're an eyesore.

  83. So, how do I block it? by blate · · Score: 1

    To all the EE geeks out there... How can I block these billboards from seeing what radio station I'm listening to? Is it possible to jam them out without disturbing my or other drivers' radios?

  84. Not on the IF frq by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't want to transmit on the IF, but on the 1st LO freq - so you'd want to transmit somewhere between 70MHz and 125 MHz.

    If you have an aviation band HT you could use that, or if you have a military rig, but otherwise your HF rig won't do any good.

  85. Oh darn!! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    And it's entirely passive, requiring no special hardware in your car...

    And here I was hoping I'd have to add hardware to *MY* car in order to make things easier from some smelly ad executive somewhere!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  86. Might as well... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The headlines are all the same anyway...

    Unrest in the Middle East
    Wildfires Rage in Western States
    Economic Woes Hamper Bush Re-election Effort

    Sean

  87. Shades of Minority Report? by gizmonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That was the first thing I thought of when I saw this article.

    Personally, I found the advertising techniques in that movie to be a hell of a lot scarier than the whole Future Crime stuff. Probably because the advertising could happen. As I watched the movie I was picturing advertising execs having wet dreams, and board meetings saying, "We need this!"

    And now, here is the beginnings of it.

    --
    WWJD?
    JWRTFM!
  88. Does this work for TVs too? by Lanoitarus · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if TVs have the same kind of leaking? cause more and more cars these days are coming with TVs in them, and TV schedules are more scheduled (i.e. i drive past a billboard at 7:15 watching FOX, so it shows me a ad targeted directly at the kind of person who watches simpsons... like maybe a ad for slashdot

    1. Re:Does this work for TVs too? by anubi · · Score: 1
      Yes, it does work for TV's too.

      This is how it works. All modern receivers are of the "superheterodyne" design. What they do is mix the incoming signal spectrum from the antenna with a "local oscillator" that runs ( 10.7 Megahertz in the case of FM, 455 Kilohertz for AM, or 45 Megahertz for TV ) from the signal you wish to receive.

      The signal you wish to receive will now appear right at the the 10.7 ( or other listed ) frequency at the output of the "mixer" stage, which is in the "front end" of the tuner. It is little more than an analog multiplier with gain. In the days of the old vacuum tubes, they just fed two grids with the two signals, then extracted the multiplied output off the plate ( pentagrid converter tube ). It was inexpensive to make, and the design was so robust it would last a lifetime without readjustment.

      The reason they do this is that it is very easy to build very high gain amplifiers that only work at one frequency. So the signal that you are "tuned" to is the only signal arriving at the "intermediate frequency (IF)" amplifier at the correct frequency. The IF amplifier has an extremely high gain, but only at one frequency ( typicals listed above ). So only the signal you were tuned to got amplified; the rest fall out of pass-band and are ignored.

      Leaving the IF amplifier, the frequency carrier is decoded for its content ( demodulated ) and sent on to the speakers or like.

      So, by using a spectrum analyzer or the like, they listen at the billboard for the faint signal of your car radio's local oscillator electronically whistling 10.7 MHz away from the signal its tuned to.

      Now, TV's emit a helluva big signal at 15,756 Hz. That's the horizontal scanning frequency. Its gonna do that no matter which channel its tuned to. ( 15,750 for B/W ). This frequency is very precise. ( It has to do with being a submultiple of the 3.57545 Mhz Color Carrier - so it doesn't form herringbone patterns on the screen. ). I haven't studied any LCD TV's with a spectrum analyzer so I can't report on them, but I do know conventional displays radiate so much that you can actually pick up their emissions and recreate the image displayed on another monitor.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  89. Mod Parent Down: RTFA by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Heck, the poster (and the moderators apparently) didn't even read the freaking blurb at the top:

    "It works by detecting what radio station you're listening to as you pass by a billboard, then displaying advertisements targeted at that station's demographic... [a]nd it's entirely passive."

    All this thing does is aggregate which signals emitted by all the tuning oscillators in everyone's radios are strongest and then change a digital billboard to display an add which is most appropriate to the most drivers on the road. Your iPod/FM adapter plays your iPod's music over some frequency that no one else is using. You would be a statistical anomaly on the billboard's system due to having to use a different station from everybody else and would be irrelevant to the system.

    It does NOT override the FM signal in the area with new ads. That would be a severe violation of FCC regulations as well as cause a ton of road rage.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  90. Easter Eggs by femto · · Score: 1

    So, if you illuminate the billboard with non-standard frequencies, will 'Easter Eggs' be found?

  91. doing our homework before we post... by aphor · · Score: 1

    Right. Someone else already pointed that out. My mistake. And you may have also missed where I said I was having a "big-brother" moment.. Thanks for teaching us about doing our homework before we post...

    --
    --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
    1. Re:doing our homework before we post... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Sorry to have been nasty about it.
      I get way too upset about that sort of thing.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:doing our homework before we post... by aphor · · Score: 1

      What I hope is not lost:
      Making the same mistake when you point out someone else's mistake.

      It's kinda funny if you take a step back and give yourself a chance to smile and appreciate the irony :)

      --
      --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
    3. Re:doing our homework before we post... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Oh, actually I wasn't making a mistake there. I was well aware that others had pointed out that you didn't read the article in the body of their messages, that it didn't hijack your radio signals, and that it would just pick up your oddball station.

      No, I was being a bastard about the fact that you had a +5 moderation on a post where neither you nor the moderators had bothered to read even the top blurb, so I posted my comment to sum up the reasons why you didn't deserve a +5 mod and to complain about the moderators who boosted you and titled my message to grab moderators' attentions in the hopes of getting the post modded back down which seems to have happened.

      That was really the unnecessarily nasty part, and I apologize for that. To be honest, I deserve a few "-1, Offtopic" mods myself.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  92. Smart Billboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens during rush hour when dozens of cars can pass in a few minutes?

  93. Will it detect my mp3 player plugged by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    into the aux. jack and the fact that the tuner has done nothing for months, I am not even sure it still works to tell ya the truth.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  94. Overkill by LeBain · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Why not just buy advertising on the radio station you want to target?

    --
    Give serendipity a chance.
  95. THE BILLBOARDS DO *NOT* CHANGE AUTOMATICALLY by nutsy · · Score: 1

    For those who haven't read the article (from the looks of things, everyone, including the person who posted the link): the billboards only detect what radio tuners are being tuned to over periods of time. It's up to the owner of the billboard to aggregate the raw data and decide what ads should go up when. As amusing as it sounds, you can't play twiddle-the-billboard by spinning the dial continuously. Remember, marketers still want themselves to control what you see. Maybe you could frustrate the system by leaving your radio on quietly and tuned to silence/static as you go by, but that's probably about it.

  96. Simple to jam. by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    The parasite signals emitted by the radios are very weak. An oscillator producing signal of suitable frequency is a trivial thing to do. If the billboard would employ Doppler effect recognition, or measure passing cars, add amplitude and frequency modulation, which will move the frequency up a little, raise the output power from zero to max, shift the freq down a little, then lower the output level. Then repeat the cycle in random intervals; a microcontroller will do. The whole assembly may be powered from a solar cell, for long life, and if equipped with a directional antenna, may be quite far away from the offending billboard (or a group of them); the required signal intensity is so low that the likeliness of interfering with anything other than the intended target is low even over lower ranges and relatively high power outputs.

    Maybe we should give a culture jamming hint to Adbusters crew...

  97. My Car Doesn't Have a Radio... by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 0

    ...you insensitive clod!

  98. CBC by rocca · · Score: 1

    In Canada, we have a national radio broadcaster called the CBC which has several radio stations for different regions in the country, and doesn't have sponsorships, advertisements, pledge drives or anything else. Of course we pay for it with tax dollars, but it's nice to be able to listen to interesting stories and music without ads.

    1. Re:CBC by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Don't want to start a big flame war about it, and I hate ads as much as the next guy, it's just I don't like being forced to pay for government programming.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    2. Re:CBC by rocca · · Score: 1

      No worries about flamewars, I enjoy hearing others opinions and can certainly understand where you're coming from.

      It's one of those things however that is going to exist anyway and has a very minimal cost overall. The equivalent of 10 full-time employees maybe and it's not like they are paying for the broadcasting licenses or antenna space on buildings the government already owns.

      There are always going to be things that the government provides that are not of use to every single Canadian, but I'm sure there are services that I pay for that you use and I don't. For example, I'm pretty sure that I'll never have a need for a breast examination nor will my wife require a prostrate test.

      There are some other benefits to the CBC other than obsecure Canadian artists though, I particularly like to hear about what is happening across the nation from a Canadian standpoint, not something you can hear on any other radio station in the Americanized media that is otherwise prevalent.

      It's one of those 'National Identity' things. :-)

  99. Re:Monitoring of Sattelite reception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can monitor the station you are listening to in your car is it possible to monitor what TV station you are watching at home? Is this how the cable company can determine if you are stealing channels?

  100. Having fun by gnovos · · Score: 1

    So, go buy yourself a cheap $5-$10 transistor radio, add some nice fresh batteries, tune it to SuperTejano 108.2 and dump it on the side of the road next to the sign. Enjoy the ensuing inexplicable rise in tamale flavored snack goods suddenly being tested out in your neighborhood.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  101. I do not listen to radio . . . by npsimons · · Score: 1

    So does that mean I'll get a blank billboard? One can only hope . . .

  102. Spycatcher by RemoteRabbit · · Score: 1

    This same technique of listening for the faint signal was invented and described by Peter Wright Author of spycatcher who used it during the cold war to look for Russian Agents in the UK who were listening to transmissions from moscow. (If you read the book u will see why it was banned) The man was a genius and he also stopped a very early defeat for the UK in WW2 by inventing another technique for deguassing ships to stop them from triggering magnetic mines. ok not 100 per cent relevent but amazingly readable.