Slashdot Mirror


Stop Christmas-Gift PCs From Feeding Worms

An Anonymous Reader writes "If you recently set up a new PC with Windows XP, or if you had the pleasure to do a 'reinstall from scratch,' you probably found that many XP systems as they are shipped today are not patched against common issues like Blaster. Given that these worms are still going strong, it doesn't take long for a new system to be infected. In particular, if you have to connect it to the Internet to download all the patches. Well, help is in sight. The SANS Institute released a paper entitled Windows XP: Surviving the First Day." (Read on below.) Update: 12/24 17:59 GMT by T : Thanks for reader Bill Curnow for the updated link. Update: 12/24 19:15 GMT by T : Besides the workaround suggested below, Roblimo has a good suggestion on avoiding the first-day-of-Windows altogether.

"With many screen shots, it will walk you through the procedure to enable the XP firewall and downloading the patches without getting infected while doing so. This could be the (free) stocking stuffer that may save Christmas for your folks ;-). Given that its probably to late now to start downloading your favorite Linux distro."

But if you do have the time and bandwidth, and you're stuck on Windows, a nice live-CD distro like Knoppix or Mepis means you can download patches without racing the worms, and install your patches while offline. (And if you have time to download 50MB, you have time to grab Damn Small Linux.)

291 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Bad link. by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    xp.homepc.org not found.

    Check those links, people.

    1. Re:Bad link. by rf0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.homepc.org/ looks like a dynamic DNS service. I bet all the requests caused the user to get dumped.

      Rus

    2. Re:Bad link. by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Funny
      xp.homepc.org not found.

      it's been clobbered by blaster.

    3. Re:Bad link. by jejones · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like the link should be http://www.sans.org/rr/papers/index.php?id=1298 as nearly as I can tell. Note that it will take you to a PDF file.

  2. Easy by skinfitz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Click Start > Network and Dial up connections

    Right click on your internet connection, choose "Properties"

    Click "Advanced"

    Click the box to turn on the firewall

    Voila. You are safe from Blaster.

    As an added precaution, deselect "Client for Microsoft Networks" from all interfaces except any you really need it on.

    1. Re:Easy by stephenbooth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure about Blaster but, that will still leave you open to a whole host of worms, viruses and exploits; many of which don't have patches/fixes available. ZoneAlarm (free as in beer) seems to consistently come out as the best firewall for Home Windows PCs in labs/test/reviews. I've been running it (on a number of different PCs) for quite a while now (over a year) and the only problem I've ever had with it was because one of the services it blocked was an RPC service (pretty sensible thing to block from the Internet really) which if you block the Microsoft DNS client in XP fails intermittantly. NB that's Microsoft's shitty systems design and not Zonealarm that is at fault.

      Another good step is to install Mozilla as a replacement for MSIE and Outlook Express (or another mail client and browser if you prefer, I like Mozilla).

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    2. Re:Easy by quasarkitten · · Score: 1

      If you have dial-up or do not want to buy a hardware firewall. Then download the free Zone Labs Firewall. It doesn't contain adware or spyware. You don't need the Plus or Pro pay-version unless you need all they extra junk, because they give you the full firewall program. Some cool features it has is it can block programs from accessing the net (Programs ask for permission ) and it has a setting where it hides your IP address when possible.

    3. Re:Easy by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only problem with ZoneAlarm is that it likes to pop up dialog boxes all of the time. This is extremely irritating when you've switched to something fullscreen, and it decides to freeze the network conneciton while it waits for you to answer it's dialog box (which you can't see).

      Granted, this is on a work machine where I'm not allowed to change the settings, so maybe it can be fixed with twiddling, but I find the behavior to be extremely annoying. I much prefer ipfw on my FreeBSD box. Just my $0.02US

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Easy by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Blaster would be on your system before your downloads were complete.
      I've seen it happen.

    5. Re:Easy by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      *gasp* patch your box instead of touting linux fud? who are you and what are you doign on /. -1 troll

    6. Re:Easy by Richard+A+Lake · · Score: 1

      You can get past this problem buy going to the program control tab/programs and entering the program manually with the add button

    7. Re:Easy by thx2001r · · Score: 1

      Another, option (for those in the know on editing Win2k/XP Local Security Policies, etc) is to check out this guide on MS's web site.

      With that guide, you're on your way to creating a template for your family, friends, etc. that you can easily email to them (then they just right click on the file and "Install" from the right click menu). With some configuration in creating one of these templates, you can keep your family, friends, etc., that have no admin backgrounds a bit more locked down than the default for Windows (pants down). Why not help them pull Windows pants back up ;)
      --

      -Joe
      If we're all god's children, what's so special about Jesus? - Jimmy Carr

    8. Re:easy by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Dont worry, Blaster will shut it down FOR YOU before you are even able to go Start -> Shutdown.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    9. Re:Easy by mountiealpha · · Score: 1

      Another way is to disable DCOM: Start > Run... Type 'dcomcnfg' (without quotes), then hit the Enter or Return key or click on the OK button. A Management Console will pop up. Click on Component Services in the left-hand pane. Click on Computers in the right-hand pane, then right-click on My Computer in the right-hand pane and choose Properties. Under the Default Properties tab, deselect the 'Enable Distributed COM on this computer' checkbox. Voila! No more Blaster!

    10. Re:Easy by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Not sure about Blaster but, that will still leave you open to a whole host of worms, viruses and exploits; many of which don't have patches/fixes available.

      It will not leave you vulnerable to network worms.

      As for viruses and exploits, Zone Alarm will not stop you getting infected, nor can it protect you apart from notifying you about outgoing connections.

      Zone Alarm is not anti-virus.

    11. Re:Easy by stephenbooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      XP firewall still leaves a large number of exploitable ports open, like much of Microsoft's product range it operates on the basis of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted (i.e. fix the problem after it has already caused a problem rather than trying to anticipate problems and fix them before they go wild). ZoneAlarm Pro (the payed for version) does have an antivirus function but it is true that the basic package does not detect viruses, neither will XP firewall. It will however block those that propagate through RPC and similar processes rather than email.

      Combining Zonealarm with a decent antivirus package (I use Sophos because I can get it for free through work, we have an enterprise license which basically says that every employee who has a licensed copy on their work PC is entitled to also have it on their home PC) and switching from IE and Outlook Express to Mozilla gives probably about as secure an XP system as you can get and still have it connected to the internet.

      Running a dedicated hardware firewall might be more secure but I suspect that is beyond most non-techie home users and harder for their techie friends to sell them on than just setting up their PC with Zonealarm and Mozilla then giving them a quick intro to the internet.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    12. Re:Easy by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      XP firewall still leaves a large number of exploitable ports open,

      No, it doesn't.

      ZoneAlarm Pro (the payed for version) does have an antivirus function but it is true that the basic package does not detect viruses, neither will XP firewall.

      Firstly, you were originally referring to the free version of Zone Alarm. Secondly, I never claimed that firewalling protects from viruses - that was you.

    13. Re:Easy by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was originally refering to the free version. That is why I said:

      it is true that the basic package does not detect viruses,

      I mentioned the Pro version to indicate that if people want virus protection in their firewall product then it is available. I was upfront about it and stated that I was talking about a different version of the product.

      Adressing your 'secondly'. Viruses are spread by a number of methods: email, disk (or other storage medium), RPC and other port exploits &c. Obviously any product that blocks the exploited ports will block that sort of attack, a worm is an example of this sort of virus. It would be trivial to construct a virus that was spread by both the disk/download vector and the worm vector, ISTR reading about such viruses being written by researchers but not released to the wild. You stated, as part of your arguement in favour of XP Firewall, explicitly that Zonealarm is not Antivirus but did not qualify that with the additional statement that XP firewall is not either. That implies that XP firewall does prevent viruses, or maybe I'm just so used to having to analyse reports and such statements that I see what is left unsaid with greater clarity than others.

      As part of my job I design and build systems to provide secure services. In doing this I have to be aware of potential security holes and so have to test for them. We did test XP firewall, as a possible second line of defense in case of a failure of our hardware firewalls or if an internal person attempted some cracking, and found that it left a number of ports open (RPC is the only one that comes to mind but I do recall there were others) which were potentially exploitable. As I recall it also lacked the 'Stealth Mode' that Zonealarm has so is open to port scanning.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  3. The title should have been.. by Poilobo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our Server: Surviving the Slashdotting

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  4. something wrong? by Stanza · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bad link? It doesn't seem to work.


    Try this instead.


    http://www.sans.org/rr/papers/index.php?id=1298

  5. And they say Slashdot hates Windows by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's been a lot of "Slashdot posts ever anti-Windows article that exists", but this article debunks that.

    I usually recommend a hardware firewall, in particular the little blue Linksys firewalls. Home users can hook up their ADSL connection, plug in the firewall, and then their PC. Then as long as they don't download email until their system is patched and anti-virus is updated, they're relatively safe from most malware.

    This year I've also begun recommending anti-spyware as well. It's amazing how ubiquitous that stuff's become over the past year.

    1. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I usually recommend a hardware firewall, in particular the little blue Linksys firewalls. Home users can hook up their ADSL connection, plug in the firewall, and then their PC. Then as long as they don't download email until their system is patched and anti-virus is updated, they're relatively safe from most malware.

      Except for the folks on dialup. And don't say you can't get a worm from dialup. The payloads are really tiny - it doesn't take that long on 56K. I have personally seen two computers infected with blaster via a dialup connection. If you're on there browsing the web for more than 30 minutes or so, the chances are quite good you'll get one, what with all the scans happening. Most ISPs are blocking the ms networking ports at their border, but within a segment, it's a free for all.

      The only hardware solution is to get a 2nd PC to be the gateway and run iptables on it (not practical), or to get an Apple Airport which will do that for you (because it has a built-in modem), but that's too expensive. I haven't found any other hardware solutions for dialup users - do any exist that are reasonably priced? (read: no more expensive than a linksys home router)

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    2. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They do exist and I think the one that I heard of has an RS232 port to hook up an external modem.

      Try the USENET newsgroups (probably comp.security.firewalls or comp.os.ms-windows.networking.*). Since I don't use dial-up, I haven't bothered to keep track of which devices do it (probably SMC).

    3. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by zog+karndon · · Score: 2, Informative

      SnapGear's Lite2 and Lite2+ firewalls have dialup connection. They're a bit more than a Linksys at $199, because they're a much smaller company than Linksys. Also, SnapGear firewalls run embedded Linux, for those who care.

    4. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot does hate Windows. Just wait for all the "Windows - so insecure, they have to write a guide to getting through a single day without getting r00ted!!" comments.

      For what little it's worth, I've run a variety of Windows versions on my home machine over the last 6 years and have never been compromised. I currently run a software firewall on this box, and I'm not even being portscanned, despite having an ADSL connection running pretty-much 14 or 15 hours a day, every day.

    5. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Is a Linksys home router less than $70? http://www.actiontec.com/products/modems/dual_pcmo dem/dpm_overview.html will do the job, and it'll allow two PCs to hookup at the same time. Also, the 2nd PC setup is practical if you're buying them a new computer, and they've already got one, which is how this /. article was spun (except it doesn't matter whether they've got one or not).

    6. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      He Said:
      This year I've also begun recommending anti-spyware as well. It's amazing how ubiquitous that stuff's become over the past year.

      Which one would you recommend? I have been using spybot search and destroy. I am a Mac desktop support person that has been enlisted to help on pc support calls. Our company is using a mixture of 98 and xp in a novell environment (mid xp transition). About 75% of the help calls that I receive are spyware related. I don't know how these companies stay in business, usually the spyware borks the machine, but that may just be interaction with the novell client. I have found it easier to reimage the machine in most cases. The worst is when 2 or more ad/spy programs get installed and end up fighting with each other for system resources, leaving the computer useless. They also forgot to patch their early XP deployments (pre-company image machines) and got welchia big time. Had to reboot routers, block offending traffic, etc... On my macs I don't have any of these types of problems ;) (sorry, had to slip that in)..

      --
      music lover since 1969
    7. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Except for the folks on dialup. And don't say you can't get a worm from dialup. The payloads are really tiny - it doesn't take that long on 56K. I have personally seen two computers infected with blaster via a dialup connection. If you're on there browsing the web for more than 30 minutes or so, the chances are quite good you'll get one, what with all the scans happening. Most ISPs are blocking the ms networking ports at their border, but within a segment, it's a free for all.

      The only hardware solution is to get a 2nd PC to be the gateway and run iptables on it (not practical), or to get an Apple Airport which will do that for you (because it has a built-in modem), but that's too expensive. I haven't found any other hardware solutions for dialup users - do any exist that are reasonably priced? (read: no more expensive than a linksys home router)

      3Com used to have a device it called a "LAN modem"...it was a 56K modem, router, and 4-port (?) hub all in one box. A currently-available product that would do the same thing is the Actiontec Dual PC Modem...Fry's sells these for about $70. The specs page says it has a built-in firewall, and you can combine it with a switch, wireless access point, or whatever to make it available to more than two computers.

      (A quick check indicates that while 3Com has discontinued the OfficeConnect 56K LAN Modem, the OfficeConnect Dual 56K LAN Modem is a currently-available product. It'll combine two dial-up connections and make them available. At about $300, it's considerably more expensive than the Actiontec product...and if you're going to pay for two phone lines and two dial-up accounts, you might as well bite the bullet and upgrade to broadband.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by eyeye · · Score: 1

      my smc barricade does (about 100, or 90$!).

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    9. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops, shoulda waited a few minutes before posting:

      " Update: 12/24 19:15 GMT by T: Besides the workaround suggested below, Roblimo has a good suggestion on avoiding the first-day-of-Windows altogether."

      They couldn't let a not-entirely-anti-MS article go, without linking to an unrelated, "run linux!" article.

    10. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by araemo · · Score: 1

      D-Link DL-704P.
      It has a printer port, AND a serial port. The serial port can be used with an old serial modem OR a null modem cable, to give you a serial console to the modem. Only has like 20 or 30 port ranges that can be forwarded at one time, but you can forward any ports you want(Unlike some routers I've seen :( ) ... of course, this makes the firewall noticeably less effective, depending on the port forwarded. :P

      And before you scream "But then they have to buy a modem too!" ... pick one up used, I did, and it works great at 56k.

    11. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by cryogen01 · · Score: 1

      I like them too, however you should be sure to port filter file sharing traffic too, because external hosts can reply to MS filesharing broadcasts and get thru the firewall otherwise. Had a worm show up on one of my machines everytime I rebooted until I figured it out.

      DLink? routers filter the filesharing ports (137-139?) by default and are cheaper to boot (although I have no real preference and in fact own the linksys one myself)

    12. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Of course Slashdot doesn't hate Windows. That's why they updated the news posting twice to heap on anti-Windows propaganda. Maybe some of us out there use Windows and like it? Maybe we've used Linux for many years and still prefer Windows? Linux is not "better" than Windows, it's "different." If I'm setting up a web server, I'm sure as hell not going to touch Windows, but by the same token if I'm building a desktop machine, I'm not going to use Linux. Flame away, you're not going to change anyone's minds and you're just gonna piss off your readers.

    13. Re:And they say Slashdot hates Windows by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Ad-Aware rocks my world. http://www.lavasoft.de/ Works well for elminating spyware, and it's free.

  6. Site slow, here's some quick n' dirty instructions by rebelcool · · Score: 5, Informative

    I figure if you're reading this on slashdot you don't need screenshots to find your way around a monitor...

    Obviously, this should be done before you plug the machine into any kind of internet connection.

    -Go to Start and then Control Panel.
    -Once in Control Panel, choose Network Connections
    -Right click on your connection of choice (if there's more than one, do it for all of them) and choose Properties.
    -Go to the advanced tab and check the Firewall check box.

    If you want to know more about how to configure it and modify the settings, click the link below that checkbox for directions.

    --

    -

  7. Re:Easy Alternative by qualico · · Score: 4, Funny

    Click Start > Network and Dial up connections Right click on your internet connection, choose "DISABLE" Voila! The proper config for any Windows Box!

  8. wormies worry me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had just plugged my joystick into the USB port when it started wildly moving in my hand! Worms infected it I swear!

    1. Re:wormies worry me by mustangsal66 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If your 'Joy' stick fits in a USB port, you have bigger problems then the blaster worm.

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    2. Re:wormies worry me by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "If your 'Joy' stick fits in a USB port, you have bigger problems then the blaster worm."

      The nice thing about flaming somebody over the internet is that you don't have to have a big dick to tell somebody they have a small one.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:wormies worry me by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, they were talking about USB Joysticks... you are coming out of left field with this Penis talk. What's up with that?

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    4. Re:wormies worry me by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      If your 'Joy' stick fits in a USB port, you have bigger problems then the blaster worm.

      Smaller, really...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    5. Re:wormies worry me by jred · · Score: 1

      I don't bother to pull it out. I just tell them to ask their girlfriend.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  9. Let's not forget... by GarfBond · · Score: 4, Informative
    those great OSS packages that you can install on Windows, if your recipient insists on keeping that as the main OS :)

  10. Chicken and the egg by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a classic catch-22 when you need to download the patches, but the act of downloading them makes you vulnerable ... I have just bought my parents a new PC (with XP, they're not up to Linux just yet ...) and I never thought twice about doing the windows-update thing... OTOH, they are behind a decent firewall (that does run Linux :-) so the risk is pretty minimal.

    Perhaps all these DSL/WiFi combo boxes will be a blessing in disguise because they all come with a firewall (on by default, with Cisco's Linksys ones :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Chicken and the egg by hazem · · Score: 1

      Catch-22 says they have a right to do anything that you can't stop them from doing. And if you ask to see Catch-22, the law says they don't have to show it to you. What law? Catch-22, of course.

      This sounds a lot like the reasoning used to detain terrorism suspects and witnesses using secret evidence.

  11. A working link to PDF by jmcglash · · Score: 1
  12. It's not just XP by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Informative
    Any distro of anything should be installed with some caution about exploits that may have popped up since the distro was made.

    Some might argue that WinXP comes with the Best Before date already expired, but there's a lot of CDs for many OSs out there with "open security". (The main problem with standard XP is the stupid requirement to phone home to register before downloading the patches to make it safe to be on the net in the first place.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:It's not just XP by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1
      You nonce.

      You have 30 days to activate windows. Plenty of time to download patches.

      Also, you don't automatically get any kind of implicit internet connection - you have to set it up. That gives you plenty of opportunity to click on "protect my computer by limiting... blah blah blah" before making your first connection.

      Get a grip.

    2. Re:It's not just XP by SoCalChris · · Score: 4, Informative

      The main problem with standard XP is the stupid requirement to phone home to register before downloading the patches to make it safe to be on the net in the first place.

      That's FUD. XP gives you 60 days to activate your copy of windows. During those 60 days, Windows is fully functional and allows you to connect without any activation related troubles.

    3. Re:It's not just XP by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1
      In the context of the article, maybe it's because XP comes pre-installed on most/all of the PCs that will be unleashed on the internet tomorrow.

      Maybe that's why the fuck it'd need to be activated, you turd.

    4. Re:It's not just XP by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Actually (at least according to the install of XP Home I just did on my mother's new laptop), its 30 days not 60.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    5. Re:It's not just XP by UU7 · · Score: 1

      You could always call their automated service to activate it.

    6. Re:It's not just XP by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      30 or 60, the point was that within the time limit, the OS is fully functional. You do not have to activate (which incidently takes a few seconds) just in order to be able to download the patches.

    7. Re:It's not just XP by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Because we're not all no good, low down filthy pirates like you - some of us pay for our software, even Windows.

    8. Re:It's not just XP by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      He said that he moved it from one hard disk to another. In times of upgrades, this is normal. XP doesn't have any restriction against upgrading hard disks.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  13. Need for Microsoft patch CD by jaredmauch · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Microsoft needs to ship everyone who does "Product Activation/Registration" with them a CD that includes the patches necessary to secure ones systems. Yes, it will always be out of date, but at least you won't get infected with some 1-2 year old vulnerability.

    People should return non-patched systems that are shipped from the manufacturer, and return systems where the install CDs don't put them to the same patch level they are shipped with.

    while this isn't a cure-all solution to the patch mania that is necessary, but will go a long way to help bring up the baseline security of all these end-user hosts on the internet.

    1. Re:Need for Microsoft patch CD by placeclicker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, they should let you boot your system without all those exploitable services that are turned on by default ( rpc, messanger, etc )

      --

      Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
    2. Re:Need for Microsoft patch CD by teslatug · · Score: 1

      Gotta be careful not to install everything though. My system kept getting locked up from the big rollup they had after SP1. So I am stuck installing the patches one by one till I figure out which one is causing me troubles.

    3. Re:Need for Microsoft patch CD by kenthorvath · · Score: 1

      No, the better solution is to do what Mandrake does, and during installation look for updated packages BEFORE installing them. Yes, this requires a network connection, but who doesn't have that these days? And if you don't have the internet, then the system is fairly secure anyway.

    4. Re:Need for Microsoft patch CD by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, a lot of users are still on dial-up. You run into the same situation, be it with Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat or MS, that you'll end up downloading well over 100 meg in updates/fixes.

    5. Re:Need for Microsoft patch CD by rakerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft does have patch CDs.

      In North America, Office Service Packs can be obtained free of charge on CD-ROM. Order Office Service Packs on CD-ROM

      They also have a free CD as part of the Security Resouce Kit (the technet website, not the book). http://microsoft.order-4.com/securitykit

      I have a webpage with more home broadband security information.

    6. Re:Need for Microsoft patch CD by man2525 · · Score: 1

      The Windows XP is in beta and has been released as an ISO to members of MSDN. Unfortunately, not being a member, I had to patch my uncle's computer over a 44K modem connection last weekend. Fortuantely, it had SP1 already.

  14. First day? by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try first ten minutes.

    Due to some oddities in the purchasing orders for new hardware this year, it ended up that some of us unix guys were tasked with hauling new windows boxes around the workplace for people. We weren't expected to set them up, just unpack, plug em in, and turn em on. Ignorant of how vulnerable windows boxen are, we did just that, doing the silly clicky crap that any OEM relase makes you do, and walked off.

    Within ten minutes, the traffic sniffers the security team has up were getting alarms caused by the machines we had set up and their ports got blackholed in about 15 minutes. One of the machines was already being used as a spam relay, the rest all had whatever viruses are still floating around.

    Was quite an eye opener, I'd thought those viruses were over and done with and weren't a cause for concern anymore. Made me wonder how much bandwidth is being wasted that we don't even acknowledge. Spam is easy because it generates email.. but there's this underlying background noise sucking up bandwidth that you don't even see.

    Course us "unix guys" had a good laugh over it, patting ourselves on the back in true bigot fashion over how secure unices are. But later that afternoon the nfs server that serves our home directories puked it's guts up so it put us in our place pretty quick.

    1. Re:First day? by pavon · · Score: 2, Informative

      No kidding, I just setup some computers for my brothers who just started college. I got a windows messenger (not the IM one) popup before I even had a chance to click on the windows update icon. That was 30 seconds after I logged in, at most 3 minutes since I turned the thing on.

      Once I got the patches, virus protector, and ad-aware installed, everything was fine, but still, there was a reason I wanted to do a clean install.

    2. Re:First day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Boy, something about this just doesn't ring true!

      Within ten minutes, the traffic sniffers the security team has up were getting alarms caused by the machines we had set up and their ports got blackholed in about 15 minutes. One of the machines was already being used as a spam relay, the rest all had whatever viruses are still floating around.

      So your security team was savvy enough to have sniffers for strange traffic but didn't have a firewall secure enough to prevent the machines from getting compromised in the first 10 minutes?

      Do you have any more details on what they were compromised with? and how?

    3. Re:First day? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work for a company which sells PCs retail, we've had a couple computers which had worms *OUT OF THE BOX* (brand new machines, never openend. We're still trying to figure that out.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:First day? by jaredmauch · · Score: 1
      Actually, This is in no way shocking to me. At the last NANOG meeting I attended (Chicago), I heard about machines being infected in about 3 minutes from power-on to infection. They were infected while downloading the patches from the Windows Update site.

      This has increased my public requests for microsoft to send postcards or CDs to people who have registered their product. Since this is mandatory (is my understanding, I don't actually have XP installed because I refuse to buy a new copy of windows each time I upgrade my system), it should be fairly easy. It will matter little to their bottom line to pay for postage and printing of a postcard (or CD if they want to take a more expensive route).

      I've found that people do not believe that their slow DSL or dial-up connections are worth hacking/infecting. The thing is it doesn't take many of them before you create enough traffic to DoS a well connected site/system off the network.

    5. Re:First day? by minusthink · · Score: 1

      "So your security team was savvy enough to have sniffers for strange traffic but didn't have a firewall secure enough to prevent the machines from getting compromised in the first 10 minutes?"

      Where I work, I'm not behind a firewall at all. Everyone is responsible for their own machine (ie. running their own firewall). It's not feasible to do it any other way.

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    6. Re:First day? by minusthink · · Score: 1

      yes, everyone is very technically capable. I work at a place called CIT which basically takes care of the mail/dns/timeshare/etc at the University at Buffalo.

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    7. Re:First day? by minusthink · · Score: 1

      well, when that first virus infection occurs, I'll let you know what my thoughts are on feasible. Don't hold your breath

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    8. Re:First day? by hazem · · Score: 2, Funny

      All I know about Bush is I had a job when Clinton was president.

      Come on, Al! Give it up already!

    9. Re:First day? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I work for a company which sells PCs retail, we've had a couple computers which had worms *OUT OF THE BOX* (brand new machines, never openend. We're still trying to figure that out.

      Not bugs. Features!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    10. Re:First day? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1
      Due to some oddities in the purchasing orders for new hardware this year, it ended up that some of us unix guys were tasked with hauling new windows boxes around the workplace for people. We weren't expected to set them up, just unpack, plug em in, and turn em on. Ignorant of how vulnerable windows boxen are, we did just that, doing the silly clicky crap that any OEM relase makes you do, and walked off.


      Sorry, that's total BS. Not much of a unix guy if you have no idea of the most common worm that made every news outlet on the planet.


      Also RedHat, SUSE, Mandrake, whatever ISOs that you can pick up at a store (you know, normal people, not the l33t people) don't have the latest patches on them either.


      I remember a specific time when I was attempting to download the patches for RedHat 6.2 back when 7.0 was 'don't touch it's borked'.


      Within the first 20 min of me downloading the up2date packages over the web my system was rooted do to a atd exploit.


      Windows isn't the only system out there that doesn't get updated day after day when new patches come out. If you're a 'normal' person (not l33t) and go out and buy a distro (since downloading 3 - 5 600MB ISOs over the web isn't something every user would do - especially one with a new PC when as far as they're concenred their computer came with a perfectly good operating system.


      Or, you could do what I did for the one person in my family that needed a computer for christmas. I bought them an eMac.


      Is Mac OS X by default more secure? No.
      Is Mac OS X by default more stable? Debatable
      Did they have to call me 5 min into setup on how to get something to work? No
      Did they have to call me 5 min into setup on how to print a full color photo with the new printer they got? no

      They did when they got a Windows machine. They'd never have gotten anything working with Linux. These are two 45+ yr olds we're talking about, one without a high school education.

      That's the target market for home computers right now, all those that would run linux have 1 or 2 computers in their home already.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  15. I feel for the home user... by aml666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My systems are behind a Hardware Proxy and a software firewall. I feel safe and have not been compromised... yet.

    Those poor home users who are not technically savvy are pretty screwed. They won't be able to figure out *nix and don't want to pay the bucks for Apple.

    Microsoft should offer (no not MSN) a method for new Windows machines to dial direct for patches before connecting to the Internet.

    This method should be over ridable for the safer crowd.

    --
    www.thejulingtoncreekplantaion.com
    1. Re:I feel for the home user... by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      Direct dial for about 100mb of patch? Welcome to 2003!

    2. Re:I feel for the home user... by aml666 · · Score: 1

      Most of them are using AOL, Earthlink or MSN anyway... I do believe that this is DIRECT DIAL as well.

      --
      www.thejulingtoncreekplantaion.com
    3. Re:I feel for the home user... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Earthlink is pretty much a regular ISP, just a big one.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:I feel for the home user... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      AOL offers broadband, at least here in the UK.

    5. Re:I feel for the home user... by subtillus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the big bucks for apple?
      what are you retarded or something?
      Taken two minutes ago from apple and dell:

      Apple emac 800 $USD shipping included
      Dell dimension 2400: 771$USD shiping included

      My brand new ibookG4 costed 1350, Canadian (with edu discount).

      That's like, what, 7 bucks american?!?

    6. Re:I feel for the home user... by aml666 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked I wasn't retarded. That was kind of rude... I've noticed that most stupid people get REAL angry for no reason.

      Remember: YOU are special!

      --
      www.thejulingtoncreekplantaion.com
    7. Re:I feel for the home user... by subtillus · · Score: 1

      I humbly apologize for the use of the word "retarded", it carried no malice or venom. I am not angry. I am special. I am in the special class. My mittens are sewn to my jacket. But, Mac's are still a good deal and they're quite drool resistant.

    8. Re:I feel for the home user... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      It would be smarter to just start with the firewall enabled out of the box, set to only accept from windowsupdate.microsoft.com. One of the first patches could be the "make the firewall configurable" patch.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    9. Re:I feel for the home user... by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      > Those poor home users who are not technically savvy are pretty screwed. They won't be able to figure out *nix and don't want to pay the bucks for Apple. Uh, you do realize that as far as the non-tech savvy go, Windows, a good GUI *nix distro, and Apple are only about equal ground, right? I'm sure you can claim that each is better in certain areas, but they're all the same in the nature of configuration you have to do in a gui (which is horribly difficult to communicate over the phone)--unless you're doing the actions yourself you're likely to forget the exact words. Command-line can be easier because you can tell them exactly what to type, but then you have to be using their OS for the same reason as a gui, the exact words used between versions change. The fact is, there's only two really good solutions to this. The first is, as Roblimo's article suggest, to just let the user do it themselves--the suggestion about restoring to manufacturer's base install even baring security updates isn't good, but that's more to do with users actually installing stuff and there being no way for a program to automatically "fix" the right things; if there was, you'd never need the button in the first place. The second solution is to have the user think for a change. In that, describe where things are located. Instead of saying "Options", say "Options" or "Preferences" or something like that. Humans, even the non-tech savvy, have pretty good pattern matching skills and should be able to find things better if you admit that the name is around something. Over time, those you help will begin to realize that the above are synonymous for the most part, that you speak vaguely about some things and more distinctly about others which should limit them wandering off when you say something distinct (they'll come back and tell you they can't find it instead of guessing that you meant "" instead), and they might even begin to learn how to do things themselves. After all, if you're slightly more verbose about how things are related (like saying how folder options are a windows explorer thing for which the "My Computer" icon uses) that coupled with the pattern matching they had to do should indirectly force them to learn something which might mean they're able to fix the problem themselves. Of course, the fact that a lot of Windows things (can't speak for Macs, since I've virtually never configured one) are so intermixed might make it next to impossible to allow for some nature of cognitive grouping to occur which would allow for the non-tech savvy to know that if they want to alter X they should look for an "Options" item in X and program Y, a "parent", won't have it. In a sad sort of way, mixing gtk+ and qt elements actually help draw the line between programs better for configuration purposes (kcontrol is still evil).

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    10. Re:I feel for the home user... by subtillus · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, retard.

  16. easy by gyratedotorg · · Score: 2, Funny

    click start -> shutdown

    --
    Gyrate Dot Org - "Where high-tech meets low-life"
  17. Sadly enough by jsav40 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We received a couple of new machines from Dell last week. They were missing just a few patches... actually a few *months* worth of patches. Inexcusable on the vendor's part- how hard is it for them to keep their base install/image up to date??? I had a CD ready to go with the relevant patches etc. & got all of the critical stuff installed before ever connecting to the internet. No wonder that so many home machines are unpatched, people incorrectly (but justifiably) assume that the new PC they just purchased will be reasonablt current as far as security patches goes. That and getting the plethora of XP patches, service packs etc. over a dial-up is very nearly impossible...

    1. Re:Sadly enough by KingDaveRa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its hard and it isn't hard to keep an image up to date. If you're an OEM building systems, you basically build a base install and you then go into a special 'system builder' mode. This enables you to configure the system, load software and set everything up, all without accepting a license agreement or entering user details. If you did that, the copy of windows would be licensed to you, and you only. When its all sorted, you put the PC into its Out Of Box Experience mode. The OOBE is the first thing a new PC will do, which includes the EULA and entering serial numbers and the like. If your image has been entered into the sysprep stage, then its pretty damn hard to coax it back out again. They probably could take an image of it pre-OOBE, but the trouble is, none of these OEMs like to just whack patches on as soon as they come out. If they put on a patch which conflicts with something and they've not tested it, they could be in for a lot of trouble. Its a liability thing on their part mainly. Maybe a better option would be enabling the firewall and the like. I know the OEM we buy PCs from at work are funny about patches and things. We had to ask if upgrading the BIOS on some Intel boards to the latest would bugger up warranties and the like. Thankfully they agreed. It is a catch-22, but it saves headaches for OEMs in some respects, but creates them in others.

    2. Re:Sadly enough by {8_8} · · Score: 1

      I think the average (non-tech) user doesn't even think about security at all when unpacking a new machine. Mom and Dad probably spend their time doing something else besides reading about "computer stuff." I know my parents only find about the big threats after the fact, when the paper has an article about it. Even then, they have to somehow notice it among the stock prices and world event stories.

  18. Re:Easy Alternative by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, the proper technique is called a "reach around". You reach around behind the box, unplug the network cable or phone line (I caught a worm over dialup once, that was the most hilarious thing ever), and consider yourself lucky.

  19. The Easy Way by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or you can just do what I did & get your Mom an iMac....

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:The Easy Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, you got my mom an iMac? Thanks!

    2. Re:The Easy Way by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Or you can just do what I did & get your Mom an iMac...."

      Think of the productivity boost they'll have with no games to play!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:The Easy Way by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      What, and spend the rest of the week trying to explain where the Start button went?

    4. Re:The Easy Way by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      She doesn't play games on her Win32 laptop as it is now. Of course the fact that she hates using it might be part of the problem.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:The Easy Way by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      ..just like you learnt speeling?

    6. Re:The Easy Way by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. I probably have half a dozen games I've paid for and never bothered to install because I'm too busy playing WarCraft III, Quake, or tranquility.

    7. Re:The Easy Way by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:The Easy Way by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The damn thing came with 0 card games & Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 4. I don't get that. At least card games are easy to find, even for a Mac.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  20. why go through all that trouble? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Just get a mac and be done with it.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:why go through all that trouble? by tb3 · · Score: 1

      True, and note that Macs come factory fresh with the latest patches installed. I checked a friend's new machine, and found that it was patched to 10.2.8 (the latest version at the time).

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:why go through all that trouble? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      note that Macs come factory fresh with the latest patches installed. I checked a friend's new machine, and found that it was patched to 10.2.8 (the latest version at the time).

      What's that got to do with anything? Most PCs come ready patched too. The issue is installing the OS from scratch. Tell me, if you'd bought a copy of Jaguar on the same day your friend bought his new Mac, would that have been version 10.2.8?

    3. Re:why go through all that trouble? by tb3 · · Score: 1

      For crying out loud, the whole point of this article is that PCs don't come patched! In most cases, they don't even have the service packs applied.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:why go through all that trouble? by zvar · · Score: 1
      Just get a mac and be done with it.

      The article mentioned most were upgrading, so let's go through the list of software I use.
      • Office. New version for Apple
      • MS Money. ok, I get to go back to Quicken, which I changed from as i didn't like them.
      • Adobe Photoshop Album. iPicture (or whatever it's called) will work. Now all I need to do is re-orginize everything to work with it.
      • Paint Shop Pro. Replace with Photoshop Elements? Is there even a good mid-range graphics program for the Mac?
      • Nokia phone software. Sorry, out of luck.
      • Mastercook. I might find somthing, heck for all I know a Mac version is made.

      So while it is possible to get a Mac, it's rarely somthing as easy as going to apple.com and ordering one and saying here you go.
      Of course if they didn't have a computer to begin with, it's a wonderful idea.
  21. It's not my fault by MidWorldOddity · · Score: 1

    I was recently called upon to fix the neighbor's pc (No, I will not fix your computer). His brother "who does computers for a living" had recently installed XP, no service packs, not hotfixes, and Norton AntiVirus with defs from December of 2000. They wanted to know why their pc wasn't working. And we wonder why all of our tech support is getting outsourced to India...

  22. just say no by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    i get lots of help calls from friends, ralatives, etc. i honestly answer that i can't help them with XP problems. i haven't used windows since 98. i do it nicely, and don't try to be mean, but i expalin that i use linux, and os x, and that i don't know to solve their problem. when they ask about viruses, i explain that i don't have that problem. just say no , and do it politely. if you help them, you are really just perpetuating the problem. and if they persist, at least bring them a cd with OO.org, ,mozilla, and a few other open source goodies. besides, with all the probelms you'll try to solve, you remember once again why it is that you don't use windows!!

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  23. Linux CDs for checkout at the local public library by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe that we should start trying to make Linux CDs available for checkout at the local public library.

    No enough people have the broadband or fast enough download capabilities to handle file sets that above a few megabytes.

    Having the inexpensive CD-R sets available for checkout at the local public library would go a long way to solving the distribution problem of the general public.

    Plus the local Linux group could keep the circulating distributions current and the latest patches available.

    I think that there was a discussion about this on Slashdot recently, but I don't recall.

  24. Slipstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can slipstream all the patches for XP and install from that.

  25. On Xmas Eve by qualico · · Score: 1

    I would hope even the geeks are giving it a rest on xmas eve. Is anyone really going to start patching computers today? Ahh, hell I'm busted. I'm posting on slashdot arn't I? Anyway, I'll try that DamSmallLinux, thanks for the gift!

  26. [Somewhat OT] "Not up to linux yet" by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Odds are, your parents never will be. The only way you'll get the majority of the population to linux is to bring linux down to them.

    c'mon, we live in a society where people can't figure out how to set the time on a VCR. You think they're going to take the time to 'learn' an OS? Most people are happy with a 4 year old system that lets them check their e-mail, save the pictures people send them, view web pages, and maybe word processing and a spreadsheet.

    Now, to keep this from being completely off topic -- you're probably doing more harm than good by putting them behind a home brew firewall, unless you're going to be keeping it updated for them. I'd recommend for general consumer use sticking with ZoneAlarm, along with AdAware and some virus protection software, and maybe some anti-spam service.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:[Somewhat OT] "Not up to linux yet" by Animaether · · Score: 1
      c'mon, we live in a society where people can't figure out how to set the time on a VCR. You think they're going to take the time to 'learn' an OS?


      If learning an OS (the reference being Linux) is akin to figuring out how to set the time on a VCR, then it's no wonder people don't go with Linux.
      Most VCRs these days, at least in Europe, grab the time off a teletext feed. There's no need to set the time unless you specifically want it to be set to a time different from the actual time.
      And if the time being automatically set correctly is akin to using Windows, then who can blame people for using Windows ?

      That said.. I don't think Linux is hard to learn, but there's definitely some ways to go in terms of user-friendliness and offerings of software that Joe User 'has' to use.
    2. Re:[Somewhat OT] "Not up to linux yet" by StormReaver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Most people are happy with a 4 year old system that lets them check their e-mail, save the pictures people send them, view web pages, and maybe word processing and a spreadsheet."

      There are a LOT of people in this situation, and they are the perfect candidates for using Linux. They have a fixed set of needs. Give them a preinstalled and preconfigured Linux box, and they treat it like a fixed-function appliance.

      I'll skip the long details, but my 57 year-old mother got so fed up with Windows' unreliability back in 2000 that she pestered me for weeks to wipe Windows and install Linux. I'd been running it for years and raving to her about its stability and reliability, so she was ready.

      Her needs were and are simple. She wants web access for online purchases, she wants email, and she wants word processing. She also wants my nephew to be able to use her computer to play the games that I have on my computer.

      I did the backup Windows data/install Linux/restore Windows data to Linux routine with Mandrake 9.0, configured her icons, set up her Internet connection and showed her how to activate it, transferred her email to Mozilla (at her request; she likes the all-in-one feature of Mozilla), showed her how to use AbiWord (which she loves) and put the necessary icons on her desktop.

      After a few brief explanations on where Linux was different from Windows (in terms that were useful to her) and how that benefitted her, she was able to use Mandrake for her everyday tasks.

      I keep intending to upgrade her to Mandrake 9.1 (and now 9.2) because the old sound driver from Mandrake 9.0 is flakey, but I keep forgetting to do it. Her system is 100% reliable for her, and Mandrake 9.0 is still chugging along now as it was back in 2000.

      I haven't had to deal with and computer problems on her system, while my dad's Windows system still needs frequent babysitting. If Yahoo Messenger weren't using a proprietary audio CODED, but used something like Ogg Vorbis instead, he would dump Windows in a heartbeat. He used to be a die-hard Windows user, but even he has finally been broken by Microsoft. He just has that one application.

  27. dell included. :) by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    My gf's sister got a Dell PC, which normally I'm against but got it for a hell of a deal ($480 CDN) for a decent p4 2.6ghz machine including 17" monitor, and as I'm setting it up, keeping it offline till I can apply the trusy blaster patch, it was already there! :)

  28. Install from stratch... by VariableSanity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recentally had to install xp from scratch (because my roomate downloaded some virus). After I get xp running again, and get all my programs installed again. I went and bought Nortin Anti-Virus. After the first scan a few hours after I re-insalled everything I already had the blaster worm and some other type of worm! I guess that is what I get for not installing the patches the moment I install xp...

  29. PDF file too large to download by Wills · · Score: 1

    When your only link to the internet runs at 19kBps or less due to telephone line noise, you're paying for the internet telephone call by the second, and you are given a PDF file which turns out to be 1.4Megabytes in size, the first thing I do is hit the cancel button and forget it. Can you summarise the conclusions or does anyone have a small ASCII version of the file please?

    1. Re:PDF file too large to download by mr.capaneus · · Score: 1

      When your only link to the internet runs at 19kBps or less due to telephone line noise, you're paying for the internet telephone call by the second

      1994 called. It wants its internet connection back.

    2. Re:PDF file too large to download by Wills · · Score: 1
      "1994 called. It wants its internet connection back."

      Haven't you got anything useful to say? I don't have any choice but to use this nominally 56kBps but actually 19kBps internet connection. Don't forget 95% of the world's population is still stuck with a 0kBps internet connection.

    3. Re:PDF file too large to download by bgordon · · Score: 1

      Well, that 95% can't get infected with blaster anyway, so why worry about them right now?

    4. Re:PDF file too large to download by Wills · · Score: 1
      "Well, that 95% can't get infected with blaster anyway"

      Why not? Even if a PC is in an area of the world without any internet connection it may still be connected to a local area network and can still be attacked any number of ways including by infection from an MSBlaster-infected PC on the same LAN. It's not uncommon even for a PC which doesn't usually have an internet connection to be taken occasionally to somewhere which does have internet access such as an educational institution and directly connected to the internet from there in order to download updates, send emails, etc -- the only way of getting (occasional) internet access in some places.

    5. Re:PDF file too large to download by Wills · · Score: 1

      Thank you and Happy Christmas!

    6. Re:PDF file too large to download by bgordon · · Score: 1

      Why not? Even if a PC is in an area of the world without any internet connection it may still be connected to a local area network and can still be attacked any number of ways including by infection from an MSBlaster-infected PC on the same LAN. It's not uncommon even for a PC which doesn't usually have an internet connection to be taken occasionally to somewhere which does have internet access such as an educational institution and directly connected to the internet from there in order to download updates, send emails, etc -- the only way of getting (occasional) internet access in some places.

      Well, it's generally been my experience that in places where the population is too poor/too rural to afford Internet connections, they don't usually have computers at home either. Instead, they have net cafes, educational institutions, libraries, etc that have computers with a connection. People I know in those types of places make a trip to a net cafe or library occasionally to check their email or do other online business. Even if they did have their own computer, they certainly wouldn't carry it to the library to send their email.

      Of course, I haven't been everywhere(not even close!), so maybe a place like you describe exists. If so, I'd genuinely like to hear where you have been that the people cannot afford an Internet connection but can afford to have a LAN full of PCs that can infect each other.

  30. The basis for a TV reality show by jhines · · Score: 4, Funny

    Steve B and Bill G install a new Windows PC, without any help, or special privileges, or special help lines.

    Now, that is what I call a reality show.

    1. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Well, there are Fedora and Mandrake, which involve putting a CD in and navigating with a mouse.

    2. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      My bet's on Linus completing the job.

    3. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "My bet's on Linus completing the job."

      I'll happily take your money.

    4. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by dinivin · · Score: 1


      Considering XFree86 ships with support for nVidia cards, what's the big deal?

      Dinivin

    5. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, with RedHat, it's pretty much just typing boot, then hitting the enter key or clicking Next, except when you need to change the time zone, and add users.

      With Windows, it's deciphering the partitioning and formatting stuff, then, finally you get to click through and type your name, company, and license key.

    6. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      OK, I'll correct it for him: How about a reality show with Linus trying to get accelerated video on XFree86 with a nVidia card and a 2.6.x kernel?

      Actually, since it's Linus, I think that Linus would win in no time, considering he knows the difference between 2.4.x (what the nVidia drivers are based on) and 2.6.0 fairly well...

    7. Re:The basis for a TV reality show by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Umm... if I were a newb, and had a blank HDD, I'd probably end up going with default partitions. (I kicked myself for not adding a FAT32 partition, though...) With Windows, it would get VERY confusing. The average person wouldn't know what the hell Setup was talking about in the blue-screen part.

  31. Re:You "unix" guys really oughtta setup a firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because someone brought in a laptop that was infeceted? Firewalls don't help a lot when the attacks are internal.

  32. Microsoft agree that XP isn't safe... by Kyle+McFarlane · · Score: 1

    Microsoft agree:
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm ?storyID =3541058&thesection=technology&thesubsection=gener al

  33. I am just doing this myself by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Using Knoppix and Mozilla, I am getting all the patches from here: TechNet.

  34. The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs faul by realmolo · · Score: 1

    I mean, really. All an ISP (or corporate network admin) needs to do to stop Blaster is block incoming/outgoing NetBIOS ports on their main connection to the internet. It's not hard. And no one should be using them anyway. I'm surprised that all the routers and firewalls sold aren't blocking these ports by default. They really should. It would save THE WORLD so much hassle.

  35. Wasted effort by MAPA3M · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who primarily uses his PC to surf for porn and download music, and does all that on a unfirewalled cable modem connection. So naturally, every now and then someone fucks his box up. At which point in time I get my ass over to his house, format the drive, and reinstall everything from scratch.

    Then one day he asks me why this never(or rather very rarely) happens to me. At which point I came to a realization that I theoreticaly could lock his box down as much as I locked my windows box down(behind firewall, most services disabled, don't use IE, etc.) but then I'd end up spending a whole lot more time in his house unlocking ad installing things that he's probably going to need at one point or another(Flash, configuring ports for e-donkey, etc.)

    Which brings me to a conclusion: If you're giving this PC as a gift to someone who's not as technicaly advanced as you are, don't even bother securing it unless they intend to keep some important info on it. You will be called upon anyway, most likely to reinstall it because someone sent them a screen saver that formated the C drive.

  36. Here on the Hell Desk... by uncleroot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do DSL tech support for a large telco with a three letter name starting with "S" and ending with "C" and I have to bite my lip every time these poor, dumb people call in connecting their brand new Dells and Compaqs to the DSL with no firewall and not a clue as to what Windows Update is and why they need it. The reason I bite my lip is that Windows Update and firewalls are outside my scope of support and I was already told by my team lead not to waste time helping people with that stuff. Even worse, offical training tells us to leave the Windows firewall off when configuring a PPPoE connection - I am not making that up!

    It's sad and irresponsible to let these people wander onto the Internet with their unprotected Windows computers like dogs wandering onto the freeway.

    1. Re:Here on the Hell Desk... by the_argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may seem wrong to you personally, but it *is* outside the scope of your job. You are a help desk to get people connected to the internet, not their personal windows guru. If they want windows help, let them call the PC manufacturer.
      If we use a car idea model, that would be the difference between calling the DMV/BMV to ask how to change your oil, or have them explain why it's important to do so.

    2. Re:Here on the Hell Desk... by jred · · Score: 1

      It's irresponsible for an ISP to require WinXP's firewall feature to be turned off. The ISP, and the ISP's other users will be directly affected if the new machine gets a worm.

      If you use the car idea model, it's more akin to the DMV telling you not to drink & drive. Not only can it mess you up, but others around you.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  37. Update sizes need to be reduced. by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft could reduce the size of patches then they could create a tool that creates a list of downloads required. This list could be placed on a USB memory card, then another tool could be used on a PC with all the patches installed (and a net connection). This tool would download all the patches onto the memory card. The patches could then be installed on the new PC, which could then be connected to the net safely.

    1. Re:Update sizes need to be reduced. by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Well Microsoft admitted they needed to reduce update sizes and have planned to reduce sizes by 30%

      Story here

      If they supply the entire DLL file instead of patches then that bloats the size of a patch.

  38. I just got bit... by cplater · · Score: 1

    I installed XP SP1 today, and the first thing I did after rebooting was to intsall the security patches, then Norton AV. As soon as Norton AV was installed I started getting warnings about welchia. I ran the Welchia removal tool, and then installed ZoneAlarm. Since I won't have much time to work on the machine before getting out of here for the day (and year for that matter,) I've just turned the machine off, just to be safe.

    --
    -- Charles A. Plater
  39. Mirror, just in case by dobedobedew · · Score: 2, Informative

    It took me five tries to get the PDF, so here is a mirror if anyone needs it.

    xpsurvivalguide.pdf

  40. That was in the article by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'll forgive you for not having read the chkdsking article (it was a bad link at the time), but what you mentioned was one of the steps listed in the article, as was the "reach around" that B3ryllium mentioned.

    1. Re:That was in the article by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      DISCLAIMER: I come from an embedded, soft-real-time programming background.

      What the heck is SOFT real-time? Is that like Win-CE?

  41. The first day? by k12linux · · Score: 1
    Windows XP: Surviving the First Day

    That's all well and good.. but how do you survive (suffer?) Windows XP after the first day? ;)

  42. My father had to fight to install XP by AsmordeanX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A friend of my Dad gave him XP Pro as a gift a month ago. He installed it then connected to the net. It took 4 minutes until he was hit by blaster.

    He finally had to resort to getting the guy that gave him XP to make a CD up of the patches so he could actually use XP on the net.

    Personally I just have to say thanks to my linux firewall.

  43. Umm... simple solution that EVERYONE should use... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Given that these worms are still going strong, it doesn't take long for a new system to be infected. In particular, if you have to connect it to the Internet to download all the patches.

    Just uhh... use a router/firewall. Problem solved

  44. Freee Hardware Firewalls by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    They give away printers these days, why not just give each customer a free single port firewall...

    And a cdR with the latest Service Pack/Security Patches.. ( and make it auto-run for the newbees )

    What would that cost a vendor.. 10 bucks tops?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  45. Use a fucking router? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most worms are either email, script faults or RPC/fileshare.

    So don't read email, visit non-update sites or open your ports below say 1000 to the outside world.

    Wow I'm a fucking genius. Since most homes have multiple computers anyways you will want a cheapo 100$ router anyways.

    Praise me!

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  46. Ha! by Denyer · · Score: 1
    "Windows XP: Surviving the First Day" :)

    Happy holidays, everyone.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  47. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your ISP shouldnt have to filter out random ports because someone somewhere wrote some crap software which is now easily explotaible over those ports .
    The fault is all the users who didnt patch there systems .
    I dont know about you but when my ISP starts port filtering I get pissed off , that my decision to make not theres (stupid monkies blocked of port 20 through 25 . I had to run ssh on a different port!)

  48. patching xp by agwis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I finally had to give in and purchase a new computer with xp. 2 things that frustrated me right off the bat was the fact that this new computer was way behind on patches, secondly...just how big the patches were I had to download. Even though I'm on highspeed dsl it still took a good 15-20 minutes to download and install all critical updates.

    I can just imagine how inexperienced people getting new computers for Christmas will feel, especially on dial up connections. When your excited about a new machine, who wants to spend the first couple of hours just trying to secure the machine before you can even browse to your first website?!

    Vendors should be forced to ensure that any computers they sell are already up to date. While we're at it, Microsoft should be forced to ensure that there products aren't so insecure before sales either :)

  49. Re:Linux CDs for checkout at the local public libr by {8_8} · · Score: 1

    What happens when a borrower asks for help installing/configuring Linux? An average librarian probably won't be able to help, especially if it involves anything esoteric. The obvious answer would be a "No support is offered" rule, but what happens when someone sues or brings an official complaint? You know this will happen, especially in our litigation-centric world. All it takes is one successful appellate case and suddenly every library will have to offer support for Linux if they want to keep distributing it. If it came down to spending MORE money developing library Linux support versus spending NO money by yanking Linux distributions, I think the average state government would drop distribution in a second.

    I hate being a law student. I keep thinking in terms of liability. I wholeheartedly support the idea of making Linux available at the library, but I just don't think it would last very long.

  50. Re:You "unix" guys really oughtta setup a firewall by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

    Depends... are there any switches around clever enough to stop this sort of thing?

  51. I got you covered by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

    Step one: Return machine to store and get a Mac.

    Step two: ?????

    Step three: Enjoy your computer.

  52. Source for XP patches? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
    Quoting the headline:

    a nice live-CD distro like Knoppix or Mepis means you can download patches without racing the worms, and install your patches while offline.

    Just where do you download the patch files to do this? I'd love to have a way to maintain an up-to-date patch disk for XP, since I support several dozen XP boxes. Not having to run Windows Update on them individually would be SOOOOO nice!

    1. Re:Source for XP patches? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1
      Somewhere on Microsoft.com. :)

      But seriously, they do have download links for stuff like that. I think the option is catered specifically to sysadmins with large numbers of machines. And can't you run your own internal windows update server and tell the Windows boxes to grab and install updates automatically?

    2. Re:Source for XP patches? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
      Somewhere on Microsoft.com :)

      Yes, I did find a way to do it, once I took the time to use Mozilla to access Microsoft.com... It complained a few times that I was using the wrong software, before letting me into the Microsoft Download Center, but you then have to go through a bunch of menus to get to EACH of the download files.

      Probably the most important patch is the Blaster patch, but there's dozens of others that should be included on a disk...

    3. Re:Source for XP patches? by David+M.+Andersen · · Score: 1

      Oh and if you are REALLY hardcore, you can parse this XML file to get all of the stuff:

      mssecure.xml
      (This file is used by Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer.)

  53. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Your ISP shouldnt have to filter out random ports because someone somewhere wrote some crap software which is now easily explotaible over those ports.

    Well, yes but what happens when the ISP's network is flooded with worm traffic? They really don't have much choice.

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Better yet! by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux /core/1/i386/iso/
    The cure for all that ails Microsoft.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    1. Re:Better yet! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux /core/1/i386/iso/
      The cure for all that ails Microsoft.

      lynx -dump "http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90474&cid=\
      7803746" | sed "s/download.fedora.redhat.com\/pub\/fedora\
      \/linux \/core\/1\/i386\/iso/www.gentoo.org/g" | more

      (Try it...if you cut-and-paste it, it works!)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Better yet! by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
      "If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison..." -Joe Lieberman

      Joe's standing in the polls continue to indicate that No One Likes a Whiner. I guess whining is the whole point of any Micros**t story on Slashdot. See how I tried to steer things back on topic while at the same time take a swipe at the Senator from Connecticut?

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    3. Re:Better yet! by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      "If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power today, not in prison..."

      If I had my way, we'd all be getting blowjobs now, too.
    4. Re:Better yet! by Belzu · · Score: 1

      If I had my way, HOWARD DEAN would get a LAST NAME!!!

  56. No kidding by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
    An Anonymous Reader writes "If you recently set up a new PC with Windows XP, or if you had the pleasure to do a 'reinstall from scratch,' you probably found that many XP systems as they are shipped today are not patched against common issues like Blaster. Given that these worms are still going strong, it doesn't take long for a new system to be infected."

    I had to nuke & rebuild my parents' machine this past Thanksgiving. I set up a dial-up connection on it and proceeded to the Windows Update site. It wasn't able to get through the first round of updates (which would've been Win2K SP4) before it was hit by the Blaster worm. (I ended up reinstalling Windows again and sharing my notebook's dial-up connection over a crossover cable to finally get it up and running. Downloading tens of megabytes of updates over dial-up sucks. :-P )

    Dealing with the worms in circulation is bad enough when you at least have one "hardened" PC to fend off attacks while you get a new machine up and running. Someone who's buying/building a new PC who doesn't have access to another system is screwed in the present environment if the new machine is to run Windows. (Mac OS X, Linux, etc. aren't viable options for all people in all situations, as much as we might like for them to be.)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  57. Firewall by Stigmata669 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As much as everyone insists that XP has more holes than swiss cheese, behind a crappy Linksys firewall my two boxes have never had any problems. I'm lazy about patches and tend to ignore them for months but i've never had a virus. Why? because i don't use their crap email client, i have a firewall, and i don't download warez off kazaa.

    Computers don't get viruses, users do.

    --
    Yawn.
    1. Re:Firewall by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      I agree that everyone should use a router that does NAT at least to block all incoming ports by default, but sometimes it's not possible.

      My friend's dad bought a satellite internet connection (they live out in the country) and the damned thing connected via USB. He (the dad) hooked it up without installing a software firewall (Win2K, so no built in one) and the machine was completely overrun within about 2 hours. He had no chance of getting behind a hardware firewall (at least a router with NAT) due to the way the hardware was built.

    2. Re:Firewall by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could run a Linux router if there's an extra computer handy...

  58. windows update on disk by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

    Windows Update is great for keeping up to date, but a fresh install requires that you connect to the internet before it is "safe" to connect to the internet. This is a problem.

    It would be nice if you could go to the windows update page and download a zip file of all the updates necessary for a fresh install (maybe it requires a CD key or something so it knows what to give you).

    Use another computer that is safe to DL this zip and burn it onto a CD, then you can be guarenteed to have your windows box up to date before going on line.

    This would also be useful for me when I update my brother's laptop which only has a modem connection. It's hell to figure out what it needs and hunt down the seperate files on microsoft.com.

  59. Re:How many Wizards does it take to setup an XP bo by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    First off, the first time any machine is connected to the net by default XP will prompt you to apply updates in the taskbar.

    On new OEM PCs you need to click on START before you see Windows Update icon to launch it.

    At worst on your own install of XP, you'll have to click on START and then PROGRAMS.

    You can't really be serious can you?

  60. Expecting 2003 performance out of 1963 phone lines by tepples · · Score: 1

    1994 called. It wants its internet connection back.

    When some areas' phone lines were strung up in the 1960s or earlier, which was long before telephone modems became commonplace, what's your legitimate gripe about mentioning 1994-class speeds?

  61. Left some holidays out... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    How about Hannukah and Kwanzaa? Lots of people get pcs for those holidays, too!
    Here are some other things I do for my clients when they get a new PC:
    1. Have them buy a new hardware router
    2. Turn on the Windows firewall
    3. Right-click on My Computer, then Manage, Services, and disable: Universal Plug and Play and Messgenger.
    4. I download the newer RPC patch at MS03-039 and install it.

    1. Re:Left some holidays out... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

      And only an Anonymous Coward would say something like that. Happy Kwanzaa to you, too.

  62. Protect Yourself Before Screwing With The Net by reallocate · · Score: 2, Informative

    When installing any operating system, you need to be protected before you open your machine to the depravatoins of the internet.

    Although Windows users incur a higher risk due to the ubiquity of the product. all operating systems are vulnerable to oen degree or another.

    Personally, I am unable to install Windows and download the updates without being infected with at least one virus. When I need to install Windows, the first thing I do is to disconnect the machine from the internet. After the install, I set up my internet connection, enable the Windows firewall, and reboot. Then I download the minimim number of updates needed to install the current version of the Norton antivirus/firewall product. Then I disable the Windows firewall and install Norton.

    The first widespread Linux virus will do damage to the OS' reputation beyond any reasomable limits. Consumer Linux distributions should disable all servers and activate a simple firewall by default. Give the user the option to turn it , not on.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Protect Yourself Before Screwing With The Net by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      Not sure about other distros but, if you tell SuSE 8.1 or above (possibly lower versions as well) that you're going to be running as a Home/Desktop then it will turn off most of the services and setup a firewall by default. The only downside of this is that if you then want to turn FTPd on so you can copy files off you Windows box onto the Linux box over the internal network then it can be a bit of a swine to set up until you work out the exact combination of settings you have to set.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  63. OEM responsibility by Twillerror · · Score: 1

    This brings up an interesting point about OEMs and patching. I've never bought a Dell, I usually build my box. Does Dell ship with the latest service pack as soon as it is available, and do they apply this critical patches to the line immediately or at all? I would at least expect the lastest service pack to be on.

    Another idea would to simply put the machine in a safe boot mode when the machine first comes up. This basically blocks all incoming traffic, and then attempts to connect to the MS site. Either via dial-up, or attempts to do a DHCP thing. Maybe even fire this the first time the network is initiated. It would definately stop the machines from getting infected before they can get patched.

    1. Re:OEM responsibility by taustin · · Score: 1

      I just set up a Dell for a coworker. It had the latest service patch, and many of the later critical updates. But not all. I suspect that most computer makers updated their disk images every few months or so. You always need to hit the update sight on a new computer, to see what's needed.

      As for safe mode, last time I tried, safe mode disabled all networking, period. That was Win98, however. Perhaps XP is better on that score.

    2. Re:OEM responsibility by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What about "Safe mode with networking"? It's right after Safe Mode on 95, 98, ME (AFAIK on the first three), 2K, and XP.

    3. Re:OEM responsibility by Zeriel · · Score: 1

      I know it's there in 2k and XP, and I know it is defintely NOT there in 95 and 98. ME wouldn't even boot on my machine, so.... =)

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  64. Virgin PCs are screwed already... B-) by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
    The problem is that, if you don't have the patches, you are likely to get blasted before your "virgin PC" could download the patches...

    I was looking for a way to do it from a safe computer, i.e., Linux-based. But, thanks - I didn't know about the customization, since I rarely do much on windowsupdate.microsoft.com other than click "Scan for updates".

  65. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by zenyu · · Score: 1

    Well, yes but what happens when the ISP's network is flooded with worm traffic? They really don't have much choice.

    Wouldn't it be much better to just disable the ports where virus floods are coming from and have an auto-dialer call up the customer and tell them their computer is infected, giving them a phone number to call once the system is fixed? Then they would be aware of their problem and probably take some more measures in the future to prevent it...

  66. The Best Christmas Present by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You can give someone is a Mac. Mom got one a while ago, and I have made two troubleshooting calls. One was due to my Dyn-dns client I had installed to reach the box ( the mac hadn't been on for a bout a month), and the other was when I got an email saying, "I can't send email". Classic.

    Compare that to a godawful dialup VNC session on a home shopping network XP box where I needed to fix blaster and the person didn't know how to get to system settings.

    I sold a mac that day with "Guess what, buy a mac and you will never have to deal with this again."

    (and I won't either, to myself) That's why it is the best Christmas present you can give yourself, if you are the designated "computer-guy". Not having to deal with other people's XP is worth its weight in Half-Life Gold, Al Franken, and Myth II: Soulblighter.

    1. Re:The Best Christmas Present by mac+os+ken · · Score: 1

      The best technology related present I ever got was a Mac. Thanks Momma.

      --
      .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  67. An actual solution by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 1

    Since no one else has actually done this yet, I went to the trouble of creating a:
    text version for you to download (11K).
    It looks like its all there but no guarentees.

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  68. Re:Linux CDs for checkout at the local public libr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "...but what happens when someone sues or brings an official complaint? You know this will happen, especially in our litigation-centric world."

    "I hate being a law student. I keep thinking in terms of liability."

    wow... just wow...

    Ladies and gentlemen, this has been a rather harrowing look into the mind of a lawyer.

  69. Re:Linux CDs for checkout at the local public libr by cduffy · · Score: 1

    The obvious answer would be a "No support is offered" rule, but what happens when someone sues or brings an official complaint?

    Have you seen the disclaimer of liability that GPLed (and most other Free) software carries? It's pretty damned heavy-duty.

    If you can show me a US case in which a distributor of Free software was forced to offer support to a customer who had no separate and paid-for support contract, then perhaps I'll consider your argument to have merit. At present, though, I disagree that the liability is so severe as you make it to be.

  70. WIndows PCs should come fully patched from the OEM by OgGreeb · · Score: 1

    It doesn't seem unreasonable to me to expect the manufacturers, particularly the just-im-time ones like Dell, to ship a machine already patched and with the firewall enabled. They slap a disk image on the drive already preconfigured with their junk anyway. Can't they update the disk image more than once a year?

    --
    -- Gary Goldberg KA3ZYW 301/249-6501 AIM:OgGreeb Digital Marketing Inc., Bowie, MD //www.digimark.net/
  71. Re:You "unix" guys really oughtta setup a firewall by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    This is're really a valid reason in large corps. Case in point: The company I work for was recently acquired by a much larger company. They required us to establish a trust with their domain, as well as with other subsidiary domains. There's NO way to filter out this crap in such an environment. Add to that the fact that sales people usually carry laptops with out-of-date virus definition files. Sure, you can script your logon for your domain, but then you have the same situation from other domains. Virtually impossible to coordinate virus def files across so many domains/subsidiaries (we're talking well over 100,100 desktops and laptops).

  72. Microsoft Makes it Easy! by starsong · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's patching system makes it a snap to update your computer. Under Linux I have to groan over long and cryptic commands like "apt-get dist-upgrade" and lumber off to get a snack while my system is automatically updated. With Windows Update and a CD writer you can get a clean, protected computer with just a few easy steps. Allow me to elaborate.

    I run a Windows 2000/Redhat 9 system. I got sick of reinstalling the OS and every single driver, recustomizing, etc, everytime Windows started acting up. So I came up with a solution. I downloaded Service Pack 4. Then I ran Windows Update until it had installed all the patches. I went into the "Add-Remove" programs listing and wrote down the numbers of all the patches I had installed, then went to Microsoft.com and downloaded the standalone installers. I burned them all to CD along with my backups and installers for all the programs I use (OpenOffice, etc) unplugged the network interface, and reinstalled Windows. Apply SP4, all patches, reboot, shut down. Then I booted into Linux and used PartImage (which has decent but experimental NTFS support) to take a snapshot of the installation (size ~600M with compression), reboot, install all applications, customize, reboot, shutdown, boot into Linux, take _another_ snapshot of the partition with all the programs installed (size ~3G). Then I booted into Windows, plugged in the interface, downloaded the things I had forgotten, and had a working system. Now when I need to reinstall I just download the new patches and programs, burn them, unplug, re-image, patch and install, reboot, image, and reboot. If I need to go back to the pristine image (like if one of the patches has an "incompatibilty" I don't notice at first before I blow away the old image), I have it on CD.

    I was hoping to get a boyfriend this year but I suppose that'll have to wait. For some reason I never seem to have the time...

    1. Re:Microsoft Makes it Easy! by donkeyoverlord · · Score: 1
      ...with just a few easy steps.
      Ummmm yeah!
    2. Re:Microsoft Makes it Easy! by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      > I was hoping to get a boyfriend this year but I suppose that'll have to wait. For some reason I never seem to have the time...

      Maybe it has something to do with how much time you spent making Win2000 work!

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    3. Re:Microsoft Makes it Easy! by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      I was hoping to get a boyfriend this year but I suppose that'll have to wait. For some reason I never seem to have the time...

      How can you expect a boyfriend when you have no friends? :-p

      Seriously, though. You could try that OSDN personals I'm seeing advertised on here or put an ad in your journal. I'm sure there are plenty of girl-hungry guys on slashdot.

  73. Re:Not up to Windows yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    If linux is set up right then it is much easier to use then Windows. No I am not suggesting that you install Linux on an older persons machine and let them loose but then I don't really suggest that you do that with Windows either.

    And I'm still scratching my head as to what you are suggesting. As a happy Linux user, I have more than my fair share of MS Windows users running around asking me to help them with this, and set up that. Most /.ers have played the role of family/friend's computer geek. So this is nothing new.

    In the beginning I was tempted to convert them all over to Linux. Now some of the more zealous are probably still thinking this is the best solution, but the sad truth is, Linux isn't compatible with the Microsoft Internet that they want to see. Their friends send them *.exe, *.scr, and *.wmv attachments that they want to run, and you just can't do that from Linux. (OK, theoretically, you can, but it takes a lot of customizing that no one has enough time & money for.)

    If you give them the gift of Linux, you will soon get non-stop whining, followed by the ungrateful cretin in question running out to some department store where they'll purchase a new PC with Windows XP Pro and a service contract. Then they'll brag about how nice their computer runs, and they'll brag about how the customer support is always availble to them, and they'll even brag about how nifty AOL is, and they'll ask if you've ever tried AOL, or any of the other questions that will make a seasoned computer user's flesh crawl.("Have you ever played that `sling-o'? That's just the funnest game!")

    But they won't ask for *your* help again. You just get to stand on the sidelines and watch the approaching train wreck.

    Come to think of it... That sounds like fun! Damn... Why did I agree to install Windows on my brother's computer again?! Why?!

  74. Roblimo fud by greygent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll probably be marked as a troll for this, but Roblimo is just wrong wrong wrong.

    Roblimo has a good suggestion on avoiding the first-day-of-Windows altogether.[link to article]

    Right, until his daughter/granny buys a webcam from the store and wants to hook it up and use it, etc. Or she wants to use x program that only runs on Windows. Grannies and relatives buy lots of this stuff off shelves at the store. The Sims, nearly another other quality game on the planet? Probably isn't going to run on Linux, is it?

    She does websites for pay... what happens when she decides she needs something like Dreamweaver, or Frontpage (gag, but a lot of people still use it) or Photoshop, in those rare cases when the (superior, IMHO) The Gimp won't fulfill her needs?

    Sure, you could use VMWare or some other such deal, but then you'll require a copy of Windows and you'll have spent more time and money than if you had just put Windows on the machine in the first place.

    What a load of narrow-minded horseshit, Roblimo. Your job as a self-appointed Linux advocate should be telling it to the people straight, and you aren't. They'll listen to you and get burned, and won't trust you or any other Linux person, next time.

    1. Re:Roblimo fud by Capt_Troy · · Score: 1

      Roblimo is the Sean Hannity of the Linux community.

    2. Re:Roblimo fud by vapor22 · · Score: 1

      Yeap, this is exactly right.

      A linux box for Christmas is all great until little Johnny wants to play Grand Theft Auto: Vice City that he got from his ill-informed mom.

      then what Roblimo? Well at least he can make a resume and begin online dating

      ---------------

      --
      -- Believe your Justice!
    3. Re:Roblimo fud by vapor22 · · Score: 1

      If all you wanted for Christmas was to play Halo and what you got was a GameCube then the GameCube does suck

      --
      -- Believe your Justice!
    4. Re:Roblimo fud by Kludge · · Score: 1

      reat until little Johnny wants to play Grand Theft Auto: Vice City that he got from his ill-informed mom.

      I may get burned for this, but then Roblimo kept yet another kid from playing a game that he really shouldn't be playing.

    5. Re:Roblimo fud by darthpenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A linux box for Christmas is all great until little Johnny wants to play Grand Theft Auto: Vice City that he got from his ill-informed mom.

      Strange, I *just* played GTA: Vice City on my slackware box, with zero problems. The entire process involved an "installpkg winex.tgz", running "winex3 setup.exe", and navigating to the game in the kde menu. If Little Johnny wants to play Vice City, he should be able to figure out at least this much.

  75. Re:Linux CDs for checkout at the local public libr by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    I remember one person mentioned giving this a try, and having to fight an uphill battle to get the library to understand that CD-R does not allways equal warez. It's a good idea though, and I'm tempted to give it a shot. Barring anything newer, I've got at least a couple old boxed sets of SUSE and Mandrake I couuld donate.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  76. Re:Easy Alternative by rikkards · · Score: 1, Informative

    There needs to be a new moderation added. Call it "Tired" as in this joke is old and isn't really that funny. Kind of like how the French always surrender and that Bush is a moron.

    (Not agreeing or disagreeing with the comments including the fact that MS has always been security unconscious but that the jokes are no longer funny)

    Plus setting any unpatched box Windows or Linux on the Internet with no Firewall in between is stupid

  77. Re:Umm... simple solution that EVERYONE should use by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

    SOHO routers are freakin easy.

    Plug WAN side into cable/dsl CPE, plug LAN side into computer, have computer set to DHCP, which out of the box machines are anyway, reboot.

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  78. a Mac may be better for one reason: support by JonathanF · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm glad to hear that the user on linux.com is happy with her copy of Mandrake, but I can't help but think that a Mac would be much, much better so long as a given person can afford it (remember, you don't need a dual G5, just an eMac or iBook).

    The reason would be the support network for when you do need support. Not everyone is or can afford to drop by, and saying "go check Ars Technica" isn't really helpful. IF they ever need professional support, it would be better to have actual phone and store support for the product.

    Not to mention that you can actually expect to find common peripherals which will work out of the box, or at least have company-supported drivers that you can install.

    Not everyone can justify the cost when you can get a new Linux box for half the price, but I wouldn't want someone spending extra on tech support (or downtime) just to save some money on the initial purchase.

  79. Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I understand wanting to advocate alternatives at all times, but come on now Rob.

    There is no way in HELL that I'd consider giving a linux machine to a friend or relative who is light on technical ability.

    I am already on call to fix the computers of my friends and family, my girlfriend, my girlfriend's best friend, my girlfriend's sister, and my girfriend's sister's girlfriend.

    I'd easily double the amount of free support that I've have to give if I gave someone a linux machine. Even if most of the calls ended up being "No, I can't help you install 'Barbie goes to the beach' because the version that you have is for Windows", that is still crap that I don't want to deal with.

    I'd rather burn a disk with Ad Aware and Spybot Search & Destroy and give it to people than to have to educate people on a system that they know nothing about.

    So many people these days don't know a thing about DOS, so how can you expect them to take the time to learn bash? More times than I would like to remember, I had to use the console to fix a problem on one of my linux machines that just couldn't be done through X. Sometimes the problem was that I couldn't launch X.

    Windows is the devil that most people know. As awful as the security is, as awful as Microsoft's business practices are, Windows is the top dog and most mundanes don't care about anything but being able to check the weather, get email, bring up a few web pages, and play some games. For most people, that is easier to do with Windows.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by KFW · · Score: 1

      I agree, this is typical "straw-man" type of article. I'll bet if a knowledgable user configured Win XP for someone, and then locked it down so that they COULD NOT INSTALL ANY NEW SOFTWARE, then XP would be just as free of tech suppoort needs. From the story he was the one who had to install new softare, since this is notoriously difficult in Linux. If all you need to do is surf the web and edit text files, then it really doesn't matter what OS you're using--they'll all work fine.
      >K

    2. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Actually for a first-time computer user you wouldn't be able to argue that they know Windows already. That's what first-time generally means.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by MrWa · · Score: 1
      I am already on call to fix the computers of my friends and family, my girlfriend, my girlfriend's best friend, my girlfriend's sister, and my girfriend's sister's girlfriend.
      Some service calls are definitely better than others, eh?
    4. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      I'd rather burn a disk with Ad Aware and Spybot Search & Destroy and give it to people than to have to educate people on a system that they know nothing about.

      What makes you think they know anything about Windows? They've been using it for years? So? Just because they've strained their brains memorizing how to use a few programs and get them to do about 10% of what they're capable of doesn't mean the know computers. It's sad to say, but for most people computers really are incomprehensible and too many that could understand them refuse to try.

      Linux is fine, linux is great, but you have to be willing to put in a little effort learning it. Yes, put those programs on. Then, use Task Scheduler to make sure they get run at reasonable intervals. It's about all you can do for people like that.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Some service calls are definitely better than others, eh?

      One time I was at my GF's place and her sister, and her sister's girlfriend came over so I could finish fixing the sister's girlfriend's computer, I was working in my GF's bedroom and all three of them came up to check on me. After the other two women left, I told my GF that I couldn't wait to get back to work and tell everyone that I spent an hour in my GF's bedroom with her and a two lesbians!

      Unfortunately, the most fun I had during that hour was in playing around with her computer...

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Actually for a first-time computer user you wouldn't be able to argue that they know Windows already. That's what first-time generally means.

      Fine then, if you want to be the SOLE source of support for a computer, feel free to give your "first time" friends and relatives linux. At least with Windows, they can go to a local computer store and pay those people for help.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    7. Re:Linux for Roblimo's Stepdaughters? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm so sure there are no people offering Linux support for money.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  80. Re:Easy Alternative by niko9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, the proper technique is called a "reach around". You reach around behind the box, unplug the network cable or phone line (I caught a worm over dialup once, that was the most hilarious thing ever), and consider yourself lucky.

    So what you're saying is, when your getting screwed by Microsoft, and they don't have the common courtesy to give you a reach around; I should go ahead and give myself one?

    Seems like a great idea to me! Thanks ;)

    --

  81. Automated download of all XP patches? by linuxghoul · · Score: 1

    I have been looking all over for an automated (wget style) way to download *ALL* patches available on windowsupdate, for say, windows XP SP1, for offline use, so i can download them all, slipstream them onto my installation media, like i do with the service packs, and voila! have a completely secure installation (as much as a windows install can be completely secure) from its first boot....havent found one yet....anyone managed to do this?

    any help appreciated!

    thx,

    Ghoul

    --
    Sigura Non Grata
    1. Re:Automated download of all XP patches? by jwlidtnet · · Score: 1

      The answer is probably "wait until the next Service Pack--which will incorporate those fixes--comes out, and slipstream it."

      I feel your pain. I wanted to make a "definitive" Win2K install disc, but as far as I could tell the post-SP4 patches won't slipstream in.

    2. Re:Automated download of all XP patches? by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      There is actually a very simple answer to this.

      1) Install Windows 2000/2003 Server
      2) Install Sofwtare Updates Server
      3) Go to http://localhost/SUSadmin/ and set to mirror from http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/
      4) Check IIS Snap in to find out where the content is being served from and go to that directory

      Voilla, all the patches

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    3. Re:Automated download of all XP patches? by Vlack · · Score: 1

      No wget-style way to do this... BUT...

      If you've got access to a Windows machine with a CD burner, you can go to the Windows Update Catalog, and download all updates for a certain Operating System / Service Pack level. Now, the filenames are not very descriptive after having downloaded them, however, it's not like you read that little description anyway ;)

  82. two suggetions & a warning about security upda by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    I'll make two suggestions on what you need to do before installing all those windows security patches:

    I'm not alone in making the first. If you're using a highspeed connection, get a connection sharing router/firewall. These things are amazingly cheap now (as low as a 1/10 of what I paid for mine) and will protect you from a lot of problems.

    My second suggestion is to download a copy of Knoppix and run it from CD before you ever update the Windows software. See if Knoppix cleanly connects to other computers as well as to the Internet. This likely sounds like a strange suggestion, so let me explain why I'm making it: I got a notebook this year and it ran Knoppix fine, connecting to my local network and (through the router) to the Internet. After a few weeks I installed the Windows "security updates". Now Knoppix will no longer boot from the same CD's and connect to the network! I've found some work arounds, but it's clear to me that the security updates are the likely cause for some really evil changes made (I suspect to the built-in NIC's configuration ROM) that stop some Linux configurations from working.

    If you get that new PC and you ever want to run something else other than Windows, it might be nice to know if Knoppix (Linux) ran fine and connected to the network without problems before installing the "security updates"

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  83. good going spamlino by Down8 · · Score: 1

    I'm not the only one who noticed that he set up his step-daughter to spam, am I?

    3rd paragraph, her 'simple web site maintenance tasks' are obviously sending spam.

    Nice job Robby,
    -bZj

    --
    .sig
  84. liability by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    So if I borrow a book on building bird feeders and accidentally nail my hand to my foot I can sue the librarian? God I love this country. But seriously, this would get so complicated for librarians that are having trouble accessing their books on their "digital card catalog." Librarians were probably English majors in college, not computer science. They'd lose it in this venture.

  85. Cat got your tongue? by illumen · · Score: 1

    My mother and father both use linux. Take time to set the computer up so they can do things they want to do. Help them out on how to do things. You can easily customise the system for them. Thus making it much better than an off the shelf system. For example, set up their digital camera to copy the pics into a dated directory, make smaller versions for sending to family via email, and/or for upload to the web. Try and figure out what programs they would like, Set up the apps they use the most on their desktop. Put all their music into ogg format so they don't have to fire up their CD player each time they want to listen to music. Have fun!

  86. lamest secure install guide ever by mgoodman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if the author of that guide seriously thinks that only enabling TCP/IP and activating microsoft's crappy internet connection firewall is going to protect your computer from malicious packets after connecting to the network, he's got another thing coming.

    sure, that methodology is easy and at the very least will help, but it certainly wont ensure security.

    at the very least he could say that if you have a good hardware or software firewall that you should install that before connecting to the network.

    still, the safest way is to simply take use a secured machine (i.e. linux) to download the MS patches and burn them to a CD, then install them from the CD.

    my 2 cents.

    --
    01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00101110
  87. Re:Easy Alternative by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

    you won't get any spyware or data-mining cookies sneaked onto your computer

    What, you're saying that not a single Linux web browser supports cookies? A "data-mining" cookie is just a cookie to track you as you browse the web - one set by an advertising site such as doubleclick. They work just as well whatever OS you're running.

    6. Use your new shiny computer as you're pleased

    Well, y'see, it pleases me to run games like Dungeon Siege, Postal 2, Warcraft 3, and a whole host of others that don't have native Linux versions (don't mention Wine, please). It also pleases me to write code in C# (again, forget mono, it's not nearly there yet). Until Linux provides me the means to do these things, it'll always be my secondary OS, Windows will be my primary, and "advice" to secure my PC by wiping Windows and installing Linux will be treated with the contempt that it deserves.

    However, none of those bugs/holes will expose your PC to worms such as Blaster

    You are of course aware that the first internet-borne worm utilised a buffer overflow in sendmail to infect computers? Don't go getting over-confident - true, I can't think of any Linux-targetting worms at the moment, but it's been done before, and it will be done again.

  88. Re:Easy Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Kind of like how the French always surrender "

    Now thats not true. The French did win the French revolution. Of course that might have been because they were fighting the French but still lets no go around making broad generlizations.

  89. Thank you by Wills · · Score: 1

    That's a tiny file. Thank you! Happy Christmas!

  90. Re:Easy Alternative by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    So, what about the people who don't have an extra computer to install Linux with NAT routing on and have satellite, or can't configure the Actiontec 56K modem+2 port router?

  91. Hmmm by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    If I brought a computer with Linux on it for someone I bet they would never give me a gift or invite me to their Christmas party again.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  92. Re:Magic Bullets by Zeriel · · Score: 1

    I hate to be a downer, but Blaster spreads via vulnerabilities in Windows RPC, i.e. via open network ports. That's what a worm is.

    --
    "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  93. Re:Magic Bullets by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

    Have you read anything about Blaster? It's spread via email attachments posing as Microsoft patches.

    Apparently you've read absolutely nothing about Blaster.

    The Blaster worm does not spread via email, but does distribute itself via the internet looking for vulnerable computers that have not been patched against a security hole first reported by Microsoft in mid-July 2003.

    That kind of ignorance is just another reason we have so many machines on the internet that are left vulnerable to these kinds of exploits.

    A firewire isn't going to do a damn thing to keep it out.

    I do totally agree with you there, though... a firewire won't help protect you from Blaster.

  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    In the case of Blaster, I believe that the packets had forged source IP addresses. The ISPs shouldn't let them out past their border routers if the IP address didn't originate from inside their network.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  96. Re:Easy Alternative by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    OK, I won't mention Wine, the project itself. However, SuSE seems to be taking a VERY nice approach here. They've got a CD with CodeWeavers' two products, and WineX, called the SuSE Linux Wine Rack for $30. Not bad, huh?

  97. Over and over. by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    If you install any Windows OS "from scratch", keep it off the net until you have the latest updates installed from your own patch CD. Turn off RPC, enable MS's internal FW, then go and get the patches you missed!
    It is simple, really. It only takes a few hours.

    Or you can install Mandrake 9.x for most of what you want to do, like surf /.

  98. Slipstream XP with SP1a and RU1 by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

    Why not go with a slipstreamed copy of WinXP that includes SP1a and RU1? Hell you can even make it install all of your apps and drivers automatically, or even tweak the hell out of it! Now from the initial install you've got a protected system, plus if your relatives system gets too screwed up they can pop in their cd and reinstall XP and all their default apps without being tech savvy!

    Jonah Hex

  99. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1


    Wouldn't it be much better to just disable the ports where virus floods are coming from...

    I am sure it would be. Now suppose you are a cable company with a million subscribers. I'd bet that implementing this would cost you several hundred thousand dollars.

  100. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by realmolo · · Score: 1

    The point is, NOBODY should be doign NetBIOS over the internet anyway. It's a massive security hole. If you need to do Windows networking over a WAN, use a VPN. That's why VPNs exist. It *is* an ISP's job to block ports that do nothing but cause trouble.

  101. Why give anyone Windows? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
    I realize some people prefer Windows, or accepts Windows as being the most convenient option, but if it were my relative there is no way I would give them a new PC with Windows on it. With the upcoming Digital Restrictions Management and lock-in that Microsoft has planned for Longhorn and beyond, you're setting your relative up for trouble down the road. Let alone the worms issue.

    I would never do this for a relative or friend. If they are new to computers, now is not the time to introduce them to Windows. Set 'em up on a Linux distro, or even a Mac.

    Yeah, yeah, I know, this sounds like a troll and all, but I am quite serious. Unless you are locked in to Windows for some reason, and given what the Windows world has endured in 2003 and what Microsoft itself says it is going to do to users in the future, please don't inflict this on yet another computer newbie. They won't thank you down the road.

  102. Re:Easy Alternative by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...Mods - mod as troll all you want. I am not trolling, though - these are the facts. Windows really sucks..."

    Why do people make statements such as this? We all know that mods can be biased, the system is imperfect, and karma really doesn't matter. What does matter is having the ability to state one's opinions/beliefs and being able to defend them.

    (tig)

    --
    Ignorance and prejudice and fear
    Walk hand in hand
  103. I used to think like you by robogun · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I had your attitude until late last month.

    I plugged a 98 box into a freshly installed cable modem (Time-Warner RoadRunner if it matters). Within 20 minutes the box was rooted. It was my mistake. I had brought the machine from a network that was behind a hardware router, and placed it directly on the cable modem. I had sharing enabled directly to the c: drive, password protected.

    The worm reset the password to null and enabled sharing of other drives.

    It then tried to write itself to all the fixed disks on the machine (that is how I detected it: I was transferring photos from a compact flash card, thru a USB, when it hanged. A copy of the virus was found on the card.

    It is possible that the infection would not have been detectable without running trojan scan and online antivirus particularly when the speed of cable is considered.

    The worm installed a backdoor on a Windows box, and then tries to locate and infect and windows shares on the block.

    Needless to say, surfing without a condom on a windows machine is dangerous indeed.

    1. Re:I used to think like you by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard similar stories - one of the honeynet machines was compromised within 15 minutes of being connected, iirc.

      That's why I said "for what it's worth" - just because I've been left alone, doesn't mean that everyone else is. Hell, maybe it's a geographical thing - I'm in the UK. Perhaps most of the script kiddies are in the US, scanning US networks. Or maybe I really have just been lucky - after all, on a site with this many users, there's bound to be a number of people who've never seen any activity, through to a number of people whose machines are rooted regularly... and a number of people doing the rooting, too.

  104. Re:Magic Bullets by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Have you read anything about Blaster? It's spread via email attachments posing as Microsoft patches. A firewire isn't going to do a damn thing to keep it out.

    The fact that you apparently write technical manuals for a living, makes this rather amusing.

    I suggest you go and read Microsoft KB article KB823980 and take a look at Microsoft patch MS03-026.

    While it is entirely feasible that someone could email the Blaster payload in an email message that appears to be a page from Microsoft's website, this is not how the worm spreads itself.

  105. Relitives and New PC's, a potent combo by C.+Alan · · Score: 1

    I just know Christmas day, or the day after, I will get a call from at least 3 relitives who got something 'cool' for their PC for christmas, and they are going to want some free 'tech support' from me.

    This is why some geeks truly do cringe when they hear a phone ring on Christmas day.

  106. Now that's BS by melted · · Score: 1

    >> Was quite an eye opener

    You don't read slashot more than once a year, do you?

  107. New XP machines are safe. by RKone2 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who has been getting XP SP1 cd's? I haven't seen a new pre-SP1 CD in over 6 months, any system/copy of XP on the shelves nowadays surely has SP1 built in.

    1. Re:New XP machines are safe. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The Blaster fix is in SP2, not SP1.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:New XP machines are safe. by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      It's not fix. Microsoft isn't addressing the issue. DCOM is entirely unncessary. There is no practical reason for anyone to run it. It just makes you more vulnerable.

  108. modem+firewall ... by timothy · · Score: 1

    I wrote a little thing about putting together a WiFi+modem setup nearly two years ago -- the prices have dropped since then; if you follow a site like techbargains.com, you can probably find a suitable WiFi/DHCP server/3- or 4-port router for something between free and $50 (after rebate), and a 56K hardware modem that would work fine for about $30 -- so I think you can say it's no more expensive than a linksys home router's regular price, anyhow. Hard to believe how much I paid for the same stuff a few years ago, but it's all H2O under the bridge now.

    I'm surprised there aren't yet integrated modem+switch+WiFi boxes as I predict in that writeup that by now there would be.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  109. Three words: by modecx · · Score: 1

    KerioPersonal Firewall

    If you're going to be installing a relative's computer, I'd just suggest that to put all of the nice tools and programs(Kerio, SpyBot Search & Destroy, Mozilla, MP3 and movie players, patches, etc. etc.) onto a CD or USB drive, and avoid downloading this stuff alltogether.

    Grandma probably dosen't have DSL or cable, afterall.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  110. Re:Easy Alternative by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 2, Funny
    >> Why do people make statements such as this? We all know that mods can be biased, the system is imperfect, and karma really doesn't matter. What does matter is having the ability to state one's opinions/beliefs and being able to defend them.

    Well, the only way to ensure not being marked as a troll is to tell the mods to go ahead and mark them as troll.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
  111. Re:Easy Alternative by Free_Lard · · Score: 1

    well, not bad if you don't mind slower performance and unsupported games. WineX doesn't work for every game, and when a new one is released,I would have to wait until it is supported, whether or not it will be supported is determined through voting, taking even more time. if you want to play games under Linux, and dont mind performance lag (i get about 70 fps in Unreal Tournament under windows XP pro, and 30 fps at the most under Linux (SuSE 8.2) with the same hardware), then SuSE's Wine Rack is the thing for you. if you care about graphics so choppy the game is virtually unplayable and entirely unenjoyable, dont bother with it. Windows will remain on hard drive with SuSE until games are worth playing on Linux.

    --
    --daniel

    pushing is the answer.
    pushing will protect you from the terrible secret of space.
  112. Re:Magic Bullets by fm6 · · Score: 1
    I was going by the descripion of Blaster on the link. Perhaps I misunderstand. If you're right, then yeah, a firewall is one way to keep Blaster from spreading. Not a good way, in my opinion.

    Let's not get picky about about what's a worm and what's a virus. Nobody uses these terms with any consistency.

  113. Re:Magic Bullets by fm6 · · Score: 1
    If I got my facts wrong, I apologize. My source for facts about the Blaster from the link in the article. Perhaps I missed something.

    Tech writers do sometimes get their facts wrong. That's why we have technical reviews -- if you can get the engineers to do them. But that's another issue!

  114. Lindows and Lycoris this Xmas by nolife · · Score: 1

    I bought one Lindows and one Lycoris machine for my kids for christmas. Good deal at $199 each at Walmart.com. Both have used Knoppix, Mandrake Move, and Fedora with on thier older machines with good results. I've had the new ones running periodically to configure everything for the local network and creating shortcuts to various places on the home file server and both have been good so far. The Lycoris "looks and feels" nicer but I could not get any video when I played movies with various codecs. I only have two complaints so far with Lindows. Every sub menu has a link to the click and run software library. A bit overboard I think. The other is the always run as root thing. Does not seem like such a good idea. I may look into changing that or wait until they trash it and try something else. I added an extra 256MB in each. The specs and hardware for the computers are identical. I forget the MB type but the CD is an LG and the hardrive is a Maxtor.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  115. Surviving the first day... by luckyguesser · · Score: 3, Informative

    is called "TCP/IP port filtering". I have encountered this experience personally, on my dorm network. When I reinstalled WinXP, I didn't even have time to download SP1 before a virus made its way onto my computer and the IS dept shut off my port. However, I've found that if I leave my network cord unpliugged (card disabled, etc) until I have setup my TCP/IP filtering settings to allow only port 80, I can then download the necessary patches, update, and remove the filter. No problems yet!

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
  116. No... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    No, sooner or later, a computer newbie is going to want to run the latest games, productivity apps, etc. How many of those run on Linux? Not many, unless you're a real fan of America's Army, which for some odd reason, they released for Linux..

  117. Re:Easy Alternative by hdparm · · Score: 1
    The reason were 2 posts above mine. They were moded trolls and mine would appear as such also. I hate being moded as troll whenever I tell what I think of Microsoft and their OS. I do not care about karma, that would be just retarded.

    I stand behind every word I ever said about windows - it isn't half-assed blubbering for the sake of it, it's my opinion based on experience I have day-in-day-out supporting both products for years.

    Windows server and windows desktop are from hell. Linux is not.

  118. Re:Easy Alternative by hdparm · · Score: 1
    You know, the only thing required on Red Hat machine is to click on RHN icon. How hard is that? No dependencies, no rpm knowledge required and definitelly no kernel recompile needed. SuSE has similar update service, Mandrake as well.

    All these services are far superior and easier to use than windows update.

  119. MOD PARENT UP by mikeswi · · Score: 1

    Thanks. The one linked in the story keeps downloading as a corrupted file. Your's works.

    I'll mirror it at http://www.spywareinfo.com/downloads/tools/xpsurvi valguide.pdf also. I intended to write a story about it, so I'll just mirror it myself.

  120. (OT) my sig by tepples · · Score: 1

    hard vs. soft real time. "Soft" means that e.g. in a video game, it's OK to skip an occasional frame.

    1. Re:(OT) my sig by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      "Soft" means that e.g. in a video game, it's OK to skip an occasional frame.

      Well, I've been out of that arena for a few years, but that is not real-time. Video games don't even come close to the requirements of real-time embedded firmware.

    2. Re:(OT) my sig by tepples · · Score: 1

      but that is not real-time.

      Perhaps where you come from, "real-time" is short for "hard real-time". But what I meant is that I don't necessarily think it's OK to lock the machine for 10 seconds at a time while it's processing or to chew through memory like Pac-Man, both of which happen in some very-high-level programming environments I've tried. Many Python and Lisp advocates like to claim that C has no place in application programs that run on 3 GHz machines with 512 MB of RAM. However, 16 MHz devices with 384 KB of RAM are still outselling even PS2 consoles.

    3. Re:(OT) my sig by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Perhaps where you come from, "real-time" is short for "hard real-time".

      Where I come from, "real-time" is short for "real-time". Talking about game playing and language interpreters in embedded real-time is just plain silly. Change your sig, and Merry Christmas!

  121. Re:Easy Alternative by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    The reason were 2 posts above mine. They were moded trolls and mine would appear as such also. I hate being moded as troll whenever I tell what I think of Microsoft and their OS.

    And that is pretty much what I said. And I also said I am doing my part to protect such opinions from biased moderation. So, are you complaining or what?

  122. Yea, don't mention Wine. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "it pleases me to run games like Dungeon Siege, Postal 2, Warcraft 3, and a whole host of others that don't have native Linux versions (don't mention Wine, please). "

    Don't mention Wine, and don't mention Windows. Do you know how many worms my GBA has had? The same number as my Xbox, SNES, GameCube, PS2, TG16, and every other game console. Plus, I don't have to spend 500$ on a video card every year so I can play 2 new games (while breaking 2 old games)!

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Yea, don't mention Wine. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that your GBA has had about the same number of worms as my PC during the 6 years I've had it - precisely zero. Oh, they exist, and they hit people all the time, just not me, because I know how to secure my PC and keep it up to date.

      As for spending $500 and breaking old games, can't say I've ever had the problem - I have games from 5 years ago that I can still play, despite having upgraded from a PR166 to a P4 2.4GHz and from Win95 to XP Pro in that time. I have not once upgraded any hardware and broken compatibility with old games. Perhaps that's because I've stuck with NVidia for my graphics cards, perhaps not. I also don't go for the latest and greatest - UT2k3 runs just fine at high detail levels on my GeForce 3 Ti200. Sure, it'll probably struggle with Doom 3, but that's not due out for a year, by which time my card'll have been replaced, being 3 generations old.

  123. Re:The long-life of the Blaster worm is the ISPs f by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

    The other option is to do what some universities do .
    Your computer gets infected with worm X , automatic network program Y detects this and adds ACL Z to direct all of your traffic to a (secure) download site for patch and once patch is downloaded (and run) remozes ACL Z .
    Sure it might cost a couple thousand to set up but if you are a huge cable company (with millions of subscribers) whats a few k ?

  124. Re:Easy Alternative by hdparm · · Score: 1

    Nope just confirming what you said.

  125. Re:Easy Alternative by dasunt · · Score: 1

    Well, y'see, it pleases me to run games like Dungeon Siege, Postal 2, Warcraft 3, and a whole host of others that don't have native Linux versions

    At least someone liked that game...

  126. Re:Easy Alternative by seraph93 · · Score: 1
    I think the reason is this: When a person states an opinion or belief, there are inevitably other people who will take it to be a statement of fact.

    Consider the following statements:

    1) Windows sucks. Linux is the best.
    2) Linux sucks. Windows is the best.

    If we take these statements to be opinions, then they can co-exist peacefully. Two different preferences have been presented, and no contradiction has occurred, as it would be mad to assume that people do not have different preferences from one another.

    However, if we take the statements to be facts, then there is a conflict. The two are mutually exclusive; both cannot be true. One must be argued, modded, or shouted down, so that only the other remains. Hence, troll moddings, arguments, flaming, and holy wars erupt, instead of rational discourse and discussion.

    It's sad, but seems to be true: Most people believe their own opinions to be facts, and would rather be proven right than learn something about the other side of the argument. You can find ample evidence of this on any message board online. The reason that people make statements such as:

    ...Mods - mod as troll all you want. I am not trolling, though - these are the facts. Windows really sucks...

    ...is probably because they've confused opinion and fact, or because they're afraid that others who have confused opinion and fact will cost them "points". Replacing the phrase, "these are the facts", with "these are my opinions" would have probably earned the poster a better score than his or her current -1.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  127. Wrong by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Grannies and relatives buy lots of this stuff off shelves at the store.

    No, they don't. What the hell kind of Granny you got? Granny (my wife's) surfs the web, and sends lots of email (STOP with the email if you're reading this, Granny!). Grannies may do their bills online or compose a letter and print it. AND MAYBE, at the outer limits, they might even play some music. Linux does 99.9% of what granny wants, and it does it better than M$.

  128. Re:Easy Alternative by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    I play UT:GOTY on both Linux AND Windows, and the only issues I've seen are that it's a bit choppier on spawning, and that there's no sound (both through Wine - haven't tried the native installer). Framerates seem the same (Intel 845) other than on spawning.

  129. What's a backup? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
    I did tech support for an ISP for over seven years, until my call-center was closed. I can't count the number of people I had to try to help when they'd lost email, files, urls or whatever. Sometimes, we got lucky; either they were looking in the wrong place, or hadn't emptied the Trash. The rest of the time, I gave them the company's mantra for the occasion: "Gone is gone."

    On a side note, sometimes the Trash works as a great backup if you know how to use it. I had a caller once delete some system files as part of removing/replacing Dial-Up Networking to make sure these files got replaced. Alas, it crashed at just the wrong moment, before the files got replaced. Now, it can't boot at all. Deo gratis, she had a boot disk. I talked her into going into the directory containing the Trash in DOS, found the files by size, copied them back to \Windows\System, renamed them and got her system working again. I doubt she ever realized that she'd probably been talking to the only tech in the company that could have done that, and it really didn't matter. Yes, I know how to keep files from going to the Trash when they're deleted, but I never have callers do it. Just In Case. That was the worst problem solved that way, but not the only one.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  130. Re:Linux CDs for checkout at the local public libr by {8_8} · · Score: 1

    Parent was a worst-case scenario post, and I admit it sounds pretty paranoid in hindsight. I still think that there could be some sort of case made for forced support. Perhaps some sort of estoppel? There would have to be some pretty severe circumstances for an estoppel argument to work, I imagine. I dunno, you're probably right and I'm just being paranoid.

  131. OEM's should shut off DCOM and messenger by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    DCOM's interface is the reason for worms like blaster and welchia. Shutting it off gives those worms nothing to bind to. I seriously think that OEM's should consider selling their PC's with DCOM turned off. Almost nobody uses it and it's a security risk. The same goes for Windows Messenger. It's an unnecessary service that should be turned off.

  132. Use Qchain.exe by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Qchain will automate the task of installing patches and can be used during installation.

  133. If it were up to me by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    You would be modded to -6 for flamebait, -6 for trolling and your IP would be banned for 48 hours

  134. Blaster within minutes of a fresh install. by Shanep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently upgraded a friends PC from ME to XP Home. She purchased XP, which came with a sticker proclaiming that it included SP1a.

    Since this was a recent purchase and the after thought SP1a sticker was there, I mistakenly assumed that it would be safe against Blaster.

    Regardless, I enabled the built in firewall on the external interface NIC before I connected to the internet via her ADSL.

    I couldn't get it going. I was using the ISP PPPoE driver which was supposed to work, but the ISP suggested I use the built in XP PPPoE driver, which worked fine. The phone tech also said that I must disable any firewall due to the use of a heartbeat initiated at their end.

    So, I reluctantly did...

    Her PC had Blaster literally within a minute or two of connecting.

    But here comes the funny part... to get around the 60 seconds to shutdown, I double clicked the time to set the year back to give me a chance to remove the virus and patch her system. Unfortunately, during this, I had to reboot. At this stage the 30 day registration period was still in effect because I had not registered. Upon reboot, the 30 day period was up, XP was demanding I register now without giving me the desktop! Luckily it seems that it automatically connected.

    Next time I'll just set it back an hour!

    This kind of crap just has not happened to me on my Apple. In the end, I enabled the firewall and she has not had a problem. It might not have happened if I knew XP better (first install), but then I gave up on Microsoft long ago.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    1. Re:Blaster within minutes of a fresh install. by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      If you turned of DCOM, she would've never been infected in the first place. DCOMCNFG ->Default Properties -> Disable Distributed COM Services on this computer.

    2. Re:Blaster within minutes of a fresh install. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip Gary.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    3. Re:Blaster within minutes of a fresh install. by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      No problem. It just frustrates me how Microsoft fails to address the problem by telling people to use firewalls and install patches.

  135. Re:Easy Alternative by jrockway · · Score: 1

    I get 90fps on the Linux version and I can't get the ()&@#Ing nvidia driver to enable AGP without crashing my system. So that's better than windows :)

    --
    My other car is first.
  136. Re:Easy Alternative by jrockway · · Score: 1

    > I have gotten really tough on down-mods while metamoderating. If it looks at all ideological (rather than about the worth of the content) in either direction, then I mark it unfair. If others do the same, hopefully, many of the moderators who let their bias show can be removed, and we won't need comments with disclaimers about the intent

    I have gotten really tough on people who don't moderate good comments about M$ down. "M$ had a patch out months ago"? Oh really? -1 Overrated. Hahahah.

    Frankly, I don't want to hear about windows. I fucking hate it. I only want to read about why Linux is good, etc. Hearing about M$ is about as fun as eating shit. And that's not very fun.

    In summary, fuck microsoft. And this most isn't flamebait, I'm sure other people want to say the same thing.

    --
    My other car is first.
  137. Re:Easy Alternative by jrockway · · Score: 1

    Windows sucks. Linux is the best.

    --
    My other car is first.
  138. Yep Yep Yep by 0x1337 · · Score: 1

    Frankly, people who are having a love affair with Mr. Balmer's micro-company need to go back into their closets and shut up.

    This is Slashdot. Here we cater to a UNIXish majority - as well as a fanatic Apple minority (lol just kidding).

    Don't like it? Don't post - its still a free country. Don't like your Microsoft-worshipping posts getting modded -999? Tough - you were asking for it.

    1. Re:Yep Yep Yep by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Don't like it? Don't post - its still a free country. Don't like your Microsoft-worshipping posts getting modded -999? Tough - you were asking for it.

      You seem to be advertising your reading comprehension problems as well as your problems with logic. The OP was was about people getting modded down for making jokes about Microsoft. And if "its [sic] still a free country", that would imply there is still free speech. Take a chill pill, learn to tolerate people who aren't as intelligent as you, and Merry Christmas.

  139. Just wanted to say "thanks"... by 1310nm · · Score: 1

    My mom and stepfather bought my sister an eMachine for Christmas with XP on it. They live 2000 miles from me, so when I talked to them this Christmas morning, I immediately told them not to plug in the RJ45 until they read the guide I was emailing them (this one). Another shitty proprietary machine saved from becoming an RPC-infected netizen!

  140. Re:Easy Alternative by Mesaeus · · Score: 1

    And who's going to mod the meta-mods ?

  141. Re:Easy Alternative by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I don't want to hear about windows. I fucking hate it. I only want to read about why Linux is good, etc. Hearing about M$ is about as fun as eating shit. And that's not very fun. . . In summary, fuck microsoft. And this most isn't flamebait, I'm sure other people want to say the same thing.

    Well, I'm no MS fan either. I use Linux. That does not mean that MS fanboys should be modded down just because they state their preference. Nor should people be modded down because they make a joke about Microsoft. If you think they should, then you'd better go read the faq about moderation, and you need to get a life - it will give you some perspective, and it will make the teensy irritants easier to bear. Oh, BTW, Merry Christmas, and have a less stressed New Year.

  142. Re:Easy Alternative by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

    Offtopic? See you in META, asshole :)

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  143. First-day vulnerabilities? Point-of-sale updaters! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Because of first-day (day zero?) vulnerabilities with Windows XP, IMO Microsoft should have to provide all vendors of Windows XP with a CD to give to purchasers of Windows XP that will install all critical updates, and design the installer for all future revisions of the operating system package to have an "Insert Critical Updates CD" stage so that one need not ever boot a new Windows installation before patching these problems (abortable if there is no such CD).

    And in cases where older versions are still on the shelf, CDs should still be provided free of charge to the end user, cost for Microsoft to bear. The company is rich enough to provide this service and not even feel it.

    And every other OS vendor as well. Apple should be providing for free security update install CDs automatically at each of its points of sale (Apple stores will download them and burn them to CD for you), the various Linux vendor packages as well (those who download ISOs can get the updates just as easily), and anyone else I might be forgetting (SCO?).

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  144. Re:First-day vulnerabilities? Point-of-sale update by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

    Agreed! I work for a place selling PCs and it's often my job to get them ready for sale. Typically, I'll use the OEM setup kit for XP, set it up on my master PC, connect it to the internet, run Windows update, enable the firewall, disable odd services and so on before whipping out the hard drive and duplicating it.

    A pain! I'd much rather give the customer another CD that the Windows Welcome setup asks them for and that they can use in the future. At the moment, we still have a problem that if the user decides they're going to reinstall XP then they'll have a classic patch-less XP install!

    Ah well...