Slashdot Mirror


The Walking Dead of Silicon Valley

Frisky070802 writes "CNN has a column about a liquidator who refers to thousands of Silicon Valley startups as the walking dead. It states: 'Pichinson, a self-described "doctor of reality" who helps liquidate companies, says he wouldn't have moved from Los Angeles to Palo Alto a few months ago had he not smelled more high-tech trouble looming.... "There's still another 6,500 to 7,500 companies out there who are among the walking dead."'"

247 comments

  1. Eww by locutus_borg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate Zombies....

    --
    - It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them. - Alfred Adler -
    1. Re:Eww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandpa: Something I never could stomach about Santa Carla, all the damn vampires!

    2. Re:Eww by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nothing a grenade or rocket launcher can't handle. Didn't quake teach you anything? ;)

    3. Re:Eww by Dreadlord · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I, Dreadlord, shall put my curse upon you, and let my army of the undead have revenge, so you never post insults about us, the undead.

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    4. Re:Eww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new zombie overlords.

    5. Re:Eww by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1

      Well, it did teach me that a Double Barrel Shotgun and Quad Damage work nicely too.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
  2. Managers taking hostages? by fjordboy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Sometimes, Pichinson and Sherwood's 60 employees are able to salvage troubled startups by cutting costs and training the executives to rethink their ways. Sherwood even brings in an FBI consultant specializing in hostage negotiation techniques to help management.


    This is possibly an idle curiosity, but how is having hostage negotiating skills going to help out management? Or are these tech firms even worse off than we thought?
    1. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Waab · · Score: 5, Insightful

      how is having hostage negotiating skills going to help out management?

      I imagine the managers of failing tech firms may have the same desperation and confusion that a hostage taker might. Letting go of the failing business model would be analogous to giving up the hostages.

    2. Re:Managers taking hostages? by NickFitz · · Score: 0, Funny

      And then they get jailed.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    3. Re:Managers taking hostages? by fjordboy · · Score: 0

      I suppose that is pretty insightful. Thanks for the answer...I guess that makes sense. Still seems like a weird solution, but this guy seems to have done pretty well for himself.

    4. Re:Managers taking hostages? by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Some companies fail because they have a stupid business model (or none at all), and no amount of business savvy can save them. But some fail because their management is in collective denial about their situation and management strategy.

      A hostage negotiator is largely a psychologist, and psychologists are fairly good with people in denial. Get management to snap out of it, realize that their strategy is in need of correction, and in some cases you can save a company that has at least a good idea.

    5. Re:Managers taking hostages? by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An alternate theory is that it's a gimmick, just like the gimmick of many of the .COMs, that he pulls out every media encounter he gets to validate what he does. It really took the cake when he compared his organization to a hospice -- that is a hospice that takes $75,000 or 7.5% of the sale value, whichever is more...

    6. Re:Managers taking hostages? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A hostage negotiator is largely a psychologist, and psychologists are fairly good with people in denial.

      Someone should assign one of those hostage negotiators to GWB's crew :)
      Sorry, I couldn't resist.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    7. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It wouldn't surprise me... I mean a lot of people probably have their compensation tied up with the company. Many people in dot-com companies worked for almost nothing. If the company restructures and the CEOs get off with very little damage (as they always do), some employees aren't going to take it lightly...

      Of course, I am not endorsing any of this. I'm just speculating on the situation..

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    8. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Glonoinha · · Score: 0, Troll

      No. Read it again in context. It means Pichinson and friends come in as the consultants from the movie Office Space (Bob and Bob) and tell the managers to fire people.

      Those people go freaky from time to time and walk back into their office with guns, take hostages and generally raise a ruckus because white people don't handle being fired out of the blue very well, particularly if they have been working hard and making sacrifices to help the company survive.

      That is when hostage negotiation skills come in handy.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    9. Re:Managers taking hostages? by deuce868 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You guys can't spell and your all fat and you have no culture!

      You have to love this one. So would using your instead of you're count as a spelling mistake? Oops, don't feed the trolls.

    10. Re:Managers taking hostages? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the training may help management prevent the current employees from leaving when they start forgetting to pay them. I see it all the time on fuckedcompany ;)

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    11. Re:Managers taking hostages? by nathanm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is possibly an idle curiosity, but how is having hostage negotiating skills going to help out management?
      I can think of two possibilities:
      1. The managers are worried about disgruntled, laid-off ex-employees going postal, or...
      2. The investors are treating the situation as failed startups who are holding their money hostage.
      Which is more likely? You decide.
    12. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Broodje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with what you say, only because of the crazyness you see on CNN every other year, but I'm also pretty sure that the shoot-the-office scenarios are an after-the-fact deal, not done on the same day. I should check my facts, but I don't recall any ape-sh*ts on the same day as the firings. And, I've witnessed people getting fired. There are many ways to tell someone who put their blood and guts into the company, only to see their bosses make out like kings and ditch the operation. I think this is the common case: How do you tell someone they wasted the last 2-3 years (or more) of their life and not be an asshole about it. Thats a hard problem.

    13. Re:Managers taking hostages? by sparklingfruit · · Score: 0

      I imagine the managers of failing tech firms may have the same desperation and confusion that a hostage taker might. Letting go of the failing business model would be analogous to giving up the hostages.

      These guys should be in Lindon, Utah, not Palo Alto.

    14. Re:Managers taking hostages? by TTL0 · · Score: 1
      My guess is that management uses these techniques to help close down the company.

      If the dev team smells the coffee then they could refuse to release source code, document thier work or system passwords, or potentially cripple the project. (flamebait) I am not judging if the tech team would be wrong in doing this, they many times have a good reason to do so(/flamebait) Not to mention it is always best to end the relationship on good terms because:
      a) maybe things will pick up and you would want to rehire them, or need to pick thier brains about some aspect of the project.
      b) it's a very small world and the techie you 'dissed could very possibly have an influence on the next place mr. management is trying to land a job.

      so yes whatever it takes for management to make a clean break is a good thing.

      --
      Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    15. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously he's thinking about a SCO type business model.

    16. Re:Managers taking hostages? by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      But nobody is holding a gun to said employees head. They are free to leave anytime.

    17. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Yeah but if some guy worked hard and ended up with nothing, that guy is going to get angry. That's the cause of these worker shootings you hear about. Some guy works hard for a long time and then they lay him off. In the dot-com companies, you didn't work long but you certainly worked a lot of hours...

      Of course, people are acting irrationally. If they were rational, there wouldn't be any of these problems...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    18. Re:Managers taking hostages? by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      maybe when the employees they just fired come back to kill them out of spite?

    19. Re:Managers taking hostages? by ExtraT · · Score: 1

      I imagine the managers of failing tech firms may have the same desperation and confusion that a hostage taker might.

      Contrary to common misconception, most hostage takers are not "desperate" or "confused". It is the job of the hostage negotiator to deceive and confuse them into releasing the hostages, or putting themselves into a vulnarable postition.
      Of course, from the stand point of this "doctor of reality" it is very logical to use a brain-washer like that - this way the good doctor will increase his profits in the transaction.

    20. Re:Managers taking hostages? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      hospice

      and this guy refers to himself as a "doctor of reality", too.

      "Only a fool makes his doctor his heir."
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    21. Re:Managers taking hostages? by K-Man · · Score: 1
      For the same reason that some companies get valued below their cash assets - here's an example of one negotiating session:
      Negotiator: OK, Bob, you put down the sock puppet. That was a big step. Don't you feel a little better now?

      Bob: Yes, but I have to...stickiness...

      Negotiator: Focus, Bob, you know that pay-per-click deal won't work; we already discussed that right? So what I need you to do now is put down the checkbook. You can still have it near you, but just put it on the floor.

      Bob: Um...B2B...Unghhh...No!

      Negotiator: Look, Bob, there's no way out of this. The acquisition fell through, the stock is delisted, your IP consists of a domain name and a cookie recipe. The best thing you can do now is put the checkbook down. It'll be so much easier if you put the checkbook down. Now, Bob.

      Bob: I'm so tired...so tired...I used to be ...Wired.

      Negotiator: I know Bob, we're all tired. It's natural, we all make mistakes.

      Bob: I have an idea. A reverse split. I always have big ideas!

      Negotiator: That's right Lenny, I mean Bob. You always have big ideas.

      (from "Of Pointing Devices and Men", one of Steinbeck's lesser-known works)

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
  3. uh oh... by holzp · · Score: 0

    I forsee a bad zombie movie...George Romero are you listening? The Dawn of the Dot Com.

    1. Re:uh oh... by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      I forsee a bad zombie movie first-person shooter tie-in...John Romero, are you listening? The Dakatana of the Dot Com.

      [sorry, couldn't resist]

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
  4. Breaking news: Man says his business will be good by Violet+Null · · Score: 4, Funny

    In breaking news, a professional liquidator who gets paid to oversee companies that are in bankruptcy said that he expects there to be a lot of companies in bankruptcy next year, helping his business.

    Facts pointing out this may not be the case were pushed aside.

    Film at eleven.

  5. Move north... by DocUi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Up a little... you know... Redmond? Had to be said.

    1. Re:Move north... by aquabat · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! Thank you. Please mod parent up!

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  6. How does this compare..... by wpiman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With other industries starting up? What percentage of restaurants fail? Bookstores? Coffee shops? Are these number way out of whack with business as a whole?

    1. Re:How does this compare..... by BillFarber · · Score: 4, Interesting
      With other industries starting up? What percentage of restaurants fail? Bookstores? Coffee shops? Are these number way out of whack with business as a whole?

      Something like 70% of all new businesses fail within their first five years.

    2. Re:How does this compare..... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What percentage of restaurants fail? Bookstores? Coffee shops? Are these number way out of whack with business as a whole?

      Let's not forget restaurants, bookstores and coffee shops actually sell things. Many of the dot-bombs didn't have any products and seemed to be just money-laundering houses for venture capitalists.

    3. Re:How does this compare..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Something like 70% of all new businesses fail within their first five years.

      But 84.7% of people don't know what they're talking about, and make up statistics.

    4. Re:How does this compare..... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Some of them were more like money disposal houses.

    5. Re:How does this compare..... by madro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Behold the power of google ... This article describes a specific study about restaurants in central Ohio, but has a quick blurb about businesses overall:

      "(H.G. Parsa, the report's author) reviewed other published studies that also suggest failure rates of restaurants to be closer to 60 percent or less after three years to five years."

      This is compared to the oft-cited conventional wisdom of a 90% failure rate in restaurants, and 70-80% for other businesses. An early-90s Inc. article says failure rates are inflated because researchers didn't account for changes in ownership -- in other words, just because a business comes under new management doesn't mean that the business has failed:

      "after eight years, 54% of start-ups still survive in some form: 28% have the original owners, and another 26% survive with new owners"

      Now, that Inc. article may be a little dated post-boom, but the basic concept still holds: *you* may have a great product or idea, and a business you launch has perhaps an even-money chance of surviving ... but you probably don't have the skills to make your product/idea stick in the marketplace.

      (I'm wondering what Alan Cox will come up with after he finishes his MBA.)

    6. Re:How does this compare..... by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      (I'm wondering what Alan Cox will come up with after he finishes his MBA.)

      Longhorn?

      /me ducks

    7. Re:How does this compare..... by Darth23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The were not money LAUNDERING operations for the venture capatilists. They were PYRAMID SCHEMES for the venture capatilists, with the ipo as the big payoff.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    8. Re:How does this compare..... by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      Or you're good at coming up with an idea and building out a business - but find the day to day operations once its successful boring and unfullfilling. So you start businesses, work thm up to where theyre self sufficient and then sell them to someone who feels they can make a go of it and doesn't mind the monotony of day to day operations.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    9. Re:How does this compare..... by gstevens · · Score: 1

      Living in central Ohio, I wouldn't recommend using this region as a measuring stick for restaurant and retail successes. First, this is a very high-growth area (on the order of quadrupled in populated in size since 1954). Second, the region has a huge concentration of retail and restaurant chain headquarters. Consequently, I think this area has an obsession with shopping and eating out. (We've been the "Fattest City in the U.S." several times.) The Columbus area also has, I believe, (and I have no reference to back this up) more square feet of retail space per capita than any other city in the U.S.
      In other words, I think Columbus is an odd-ball when it comes to business successes in the restaurant and retail space.

    10. Re:How does this compare..... by flynt · · Score: 1

      The fact that this post got modded to +5 has shown that almost all , if not, all logical reasoning and analytical ability has left this place.

    11. Re:How does this compare..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A report I just read puts that figure closer to 84.8%

    12. Re:How does this compare..... by Basehart · · Score: 1

      If only someone in school, or among friends and family, had said these words when I was a kid. Man, the sparks would have started flying! Those little cogs in my brain would have been spinning like crazy.

      All I remember from teachers and relatives was "get a job". Not once was there any indication whatsover that it was possible to have a cool idea and run with it, make your own career. Actually create a job out of thin air.

    13. Re:How does this compare..... by firewood · · Score: 1
      > What percentage of restaurants fail? Bookstores? Coffee shops? Are these number way out of whack with business as a whole?


      Let's not forget restaurants, bookstores and coffee shops actually sell things.


      Selling things at a loss is a worse businesss plan than not having any product at all.

    14. Re:How does this compare..... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      This one needs modding up for sure. The IPO as a business plan has backfired!

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  7. Re:Quick by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
    Brains! Braiiiiinnssss.....

    Poor zombies... will be hard for them to get their fix...

    --
    This comment does not exist.
  8. Small companies can still survive by Gary+Whittles · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Recently, I was inspired to look up an old company I use to work for. They employed about 12 people total.

    They had three sales people, three support people, on tester, one secretary, three programmers. One of the programmers doubled as their sysadmin. The support staff had to work on bugs for Q&A in their time between calls. They literally had clients that were some of the biggest lawfirms around.

    They made a product. They sold a product. They made money.

    The guys who started the thing took out personal loans to keep it going for awhile. He passed out profits back to the employees when times were good. Honestly, if there was a place to be promoted to or a position open when I was ready to go on I probably would have never left.

    Small companies can survive in the IT world. They just have to have half a clue in their heads to do it.

    Fill a niche, concetrate and expand along the niche not outside it, keep employee and overhead costs low (their building was nothing grand but I had my own office).

    This is basic business stuff that many companies still have no concept of.

    1. Re:Small companies can still survive by larien · · Score: 3, Informative

      And small companies can raise $59m for the owners, even if they only have 21 employees.

    2. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how's that old company doing these days?

    3. Re:Small companies can still survive by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      Indeed . I find my self agreeing with you very much .
      Many tech firms try and be the next big Microsoft by offering a whole range of products . Find an area at which you are good at , there arent a lot of competitors and focus in on that area .

    4. Re:Small companies can still survive by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      number 1...don't open shop in silicon valley! real estate is way to expensive there. Try someplace in the midwest where they still have the auto infrastructure of schools and empty offices for cheap. And your employees can live nicely off 30K-50K!

    5. Re:Small companies can still survive by aquabat · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but is that tubgirl ad supposed to be your sig?

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    6. Re:Small companies can still survive by denisdekat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So true and those are the ones that are. Here in San Francisco I see many folks purposely leaving big company services for small companies as all the folks they worked with got layed off and started their own companies. One example is my friend whose company shut down his division and stoped certain development services he was part of. He then contacted the ex clients and as he was ex employee he offered them same thing cheaper. Of course they took it ;) I see this happening a lot, and maybe I am idealistic about America, California, and San Francisco, but the real entrepeneurs will not go away :) There was money to be made, but only after they got rid of all that bloated middle management LOL

    7. Re:Small companies can still survive by fuzzybunny · · Score: 5, Interesting


      A couple of years ago, I was invited to join some colleagues in a payment technologies startup in Munich.

      This was a highly impressive bunch of people. The senior guys came from one of the major producers of financial transaction enabler platforms, which would be a core part of our offer, with a huge customer base. The management of that company was friendly with the guys starting ours, who had an excellent understanding of the technology and the field, and great customer contacts.

      We had backing from one of Germany's major prestigious conulting firms, and a very senior, respected politician, who would help us to many useful contacts in industry. No fixed costs, and a free office in one of the country's most prestigious locations didn't hurt.

      We had awesome ideas which could be translated into real-life technology pretty quickly (essentially taking existing components and putting them to fairly revolutionary use.) A lot of companies were really looking to do business with us. But we failed. Why?

      The "guys in charge" were an incredibly venal, slow bunch. They took about 6 months (!!!!) to come up with a semi-legible business plan, and refused any sort of capital, even angel funding, beyond what they themselves had put in initially (complete refusal to hand over any control, anyone?) They did not understand the concept of "do something, do anything to get started", including low-level use of free technology, such as improvised websites and initial customers, preferring to plan for pie-in-the-sky everything-must-be-perfect-before-we-move. Suck. A lot of startups die because they have crappy product, or work inefficiently, or a bad business model, or economic realities. Us? Our own goddamm fault, 100%, and I could kick some people for it (no, not myself, I was one of several people constantly screaming to DO SOMETHING, so I feel pretty vindicated, if disappointed.)

      It especially irks me nowadays to see a lot of the technology and processes that we came up with in our spare time (!) in use commercially, 4 years after we died miserably. My girlfriend started work in one of the big-howevermany consulting firms, and showed me a presentation they'd done that year for some eastern european telecoms and financial institutions, which went over like gangbusters. Not plagiarized from us, since someone was bound to do this stuff in the long run, but eye-popping nonetheless. If we'd only...

      The thing that bugs me so tremendously is the sheer wasted opportunity here. I have no mercy with all the crappy dot-coms that blowthedotoutyourass.com (look it up) was so bitter about--there was no reason for most of them to exist. But I really really hate it when a good thing dies for no really justifiable reason.

      Blargh.

      So your comment about "half a clue in their heads" is so spot-on I could spit.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    8. Re:Small companies can still survive by serano · · Score: 1

      I also recently revisited the website of a company I used to work for. It was a small to mid-size consulting company. I was happy to see they had postings for over 20 developer positions, until I looked closer and saw all but 2 of those positions were in India. The 2 in the US were for Senior Project Lead/Architects.

    9. Re:Small companies can still survive by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Small companies can survive in the IT world. They just have to have half a clue in their heads to do it.
      Exactly. Where I work, we used to be as big as 12 employees back in the 1980s. We're a lot smaller now. But we're hanging in there, selling our canned software to our niche customers, and billing custom work.

      You can make a profit as long as you keep your feet on the ground and remember to do what customers want and charge them for it.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    10. Re:Small companies can still survive by Broodje · · Score: 1

      Em, try again. That used to be true a few years ago. It is still expensive (compared to Wyoming, I'm sure), but if you are a tech company, nothing beats being 3 doors down from your customers. There are so many empty buildings in the valley now that they will gladly eat their left hand to get you to sign a lease. I know this, I just got my landlord to chop my lease IN HALF, and get my logo put on the big sign facing North 1rst street. My little dinky company, manhandling the real estate kings. It's still expensive, but it's a renters market.

    11. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, we used to be as big as 12 employees back in the 1980s. We're a lot smaller now.

      How do you become a lot smaller than 12 people?

    12. Re:Small companies can still survive by wjzhu · · Score: 1

      What you shared is true wisdom. Most innovations are obvious improvements that most techies are capable of imagining and implementing, so it is only a matter of time that others will take ideas to products if you dont quickly corner the market yourself.

    13. Re:Small companies can still survive by taradfong · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to play devil's advocate here. I've been part of lots of startups where I too thought that I had all the answers. And maybe I/you did. But this attitude can drive you nuts. So for your own sanity consider this...

      1) Ok, what they did didn't work. That doesn't mean your 'do anything to get started' plan would have necessarily worked either.

      2) The squeaky wheel does get fixed, that is, unless it just keeps squeaking. Then it gets thrown away for a nice, quiet one from India. Seriously, lingering bitterness just means you're cutting off future opportunities

      3) Yes, there was wasted opportunity. It's gone. Forget it. Look for the *next* opportunity! Or do it yourself next time and show them!

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
    14. Re:Small companies can still survive by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Why do I have a funny feeling that his new business was using intellectual property that was owned by his former employer?

    15. Re:Small companies can still survive by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      By becoming 3 people.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    16. Re:Small companies can still survive by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do companies fail?

      Because they fail to make profits?

      No.

      Because the run out cash. People demand to be paid right away, and don't care about your booked orders or even your receivables.

      What's the biggest cash outlay for a business? Almost alway payroll. And the biggest hits on the payroll are usually the founders, who have a massive ego investment in the survival of the business.

      This gives a very small business considerable resiliency. Take a ten person company with two founders who account for a third of the payroll. If they get into trouble, the two founders can take themselves off the payroll for a month or two and work hard to make the cash come in. Try getting 33% of the payroll of a large company to come into work for free AND work extra hours.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:Small companies can still survive by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I got laid-off from a company a few years ago to "cut costs". They let go about 75% of the work force and dropped the payroll by about 25%. In other words they kept ALL of the VPs, most of the Directors, all of the Sales, dropped IT, support, marketing and most of the engineers. Now they add 1-2 minor features to the same product they have been selling for years, call it version X+1 and they all collect fat salaries.

      Why is it that the people who couldn't pass algebra in high school are the ones with the cushy jobs? Maybe it is our own stupidity that we aren't the VPs ripping people off while making 1/4 mil per year. Or maybe it's morals...

      -Comedian

    18. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big problem with the Midwest is that outside of a few large cities, it's deadly dull and the climate sucks. Which is why many of us in the West no longer live there...

    19. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What midwest? Bangalore is THE NEW SiVa!

    20. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could kick some people for it (no, not myself, I was one of several people constantly screaming to DO SOMETHING, so I feel pretty vindicated, if disappointed.)

      OK, so since they didn't follow your advice and failed, it logically follows that if they followed your advice they would not have failed.

      It especially irks me nowadays to see a lot of the technology and processes that we came up with in our spare time

      Yeah, I've seen the ad where the guy who came up with the idea for 'the clapper' missed out on billions because he didn't patent it. Maybe you should look him up and you two can become pen pals or something.

    21. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pulling over old clients after you leave a company is really poor form and shows a complete lack of professionality.

      I would expect that the clients simply never pay your friend since they know there's no recourse on his part.

      If you really have a good product, it's not hard to track down new clients and maybe attract the old clients on your own.

      But to lowball your previous employer in direct competition is unethical, and likely illegal.

    22. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to disagree, for the most part.

      I'm in Germany, too, and worked in "new media" related companies since 1995. I can't count the number of German startups I worked for or where I knew people personally that crashed because they DID "SOMETHING" fast, spent lots of money fast, but didn't think before they did it.

      I remember in 2000 a string of business plans presented to me and my fellow team of developers from various startups who wanted our services. These people had a business plan, they had funding, they had hired the management team, they had a release date for their product. Everything was greenlighted and their company already formed, no way to stop the thing - and they sat there, asking "say, as a software developer, do you think this is possible, technically?" Sheer idiocy.

      Maybe your bosses were the other extreme, maybe they thought too much, but most companies that are now on dotcomtod thought too little and/or too late.

      Afraid of giving away control? I've seen a perfectly fine German company being bought out by an international IT company. That medium-sized company had good clients and was long in the business (relatively speaking, we're talking about the "new media" business), some of them boring bread-and-butter industry clients, but perfectly happy with the service they got.

      The new visionary international managers sent all of us to seminar after seminar with lots of blahblah, put up cheesy mission statement posters at every wall and canceled the contracts with the boring, but long-since happy clients because "to go after the big ones, you have to leave the small ones behind you".

      That German company was dead months after being purchased. In fact, the whole international IT company crashed and burned shortly thereafter, with offices all over the US and Europe.

      I now run a small German IT service company, we're a group of four developers. We made sure to NOT depend on any external money whatsoever. We made sure to NOT accept any "develop for free and we'll share profits later" deals.

      We just threw together some cash, secured clients, got started and were earning a small, but steady and healthy profit right from the beginning. We're doing really well after 2 1/2 years, while the IT business as a whole is suffering in Germany.

      Ok, we're not a startup, we do not have a time of, say, two years of development with nil sales, so we're a different case. But I wouldn't give away control or DO SOMETHING just for sake of doing anything, nonono.

    23. Re:Small companies can still survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they allowed to smoke in bars and restaurants in the midwest? I don't like coming home in a shirt that smells like an ashtray.

    24. Re:Small companies can still survive by Snake_Plisken · · Score: 1

      Don't sales reps who are recently hired often get bonus for "bringing" their client base with them? I have heard of this before, but I don't know for sure since I am not in Sales. Seems to me that if there is a lack of a NDA or non compete then all's fair. If I was a client being pulled from one company to another with a central person involved, I would do it for one of two reasons (both would be best) 1) I have a track record with the central person - I know that if I need 25,000 widgets or 10,000 lines of code by Friday, they will deliver. 2) As mentioned before, they are cheaper. Seems to me to be part of competition in the business world, but then again, this isn't my area of expertise.

      --

      Eat recycled food - it's good for the environment, and OK for you.
    25. Re:Small companies can still survive by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


      You're right--but I did say that I'm not bitter about the whole thing, just disappointed.

      Squeaky wheel--yup. Tried. Did. Wasn't up to the task, unfortunately. The stuff that needed doing was simply not possible for me to do.

      Best thing to do? Learn from mistakes, as you say. Remember, one learns more from a shitty work experience than from a good one.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    26. Re:Small companies can still survive by denisdekat · · Score: 1

      Not the case, he is just web developer, doing web stuff as I understood it. Nothing specific aobut what he was doing, and he has done more with their relationship than their company originaly did. In any case, some folks are using this layoff and restructure chaos to their advantage. I am sure there should be more...

  9. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is more like an advert for his company... I wonder what this will have done to his stock price.

    1. Re:This is news? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

      More to the point ; nothing, because his company is not listed on public markets.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
  10. Liquidators vs Vultures by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only difference between a liquidator and a vulture is that the sh*t from a vulture goes back into the soil as nutrients and helps other things to grow.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by 68k+geek · · Score: 1

      well, being that the liquidator's equivalent of vulture shit is the stuff they spend their (earned from liquidation) money on, allegorically, there actually _isn't_ a difference.

    2. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by pandrijeczko · · Score: 0

      Still got a higher score than you though :-)

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There it is, the greatest thing you'll ever acheive.

    4. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by CACondor · · Score: 2

      Actually, vultures use their feces to cool their legs, so it doesn't go back into the soil as quickly as you might think.

      (Condors do the same thing.)

    5. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by mikeee · · Score: 1

      A liquidator sells business equipment cheap. That has to be a good thing for some other savvy start-up, doesn't it?

    6. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me several readings until I figured that you aren't talking about vulture capitalists... or are you? I mean, from an ethics point of view I don't see much difference between a liquidator and a vulture capitalist.

    7. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's *STILL* a higher score than you've got...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    8. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      I thought liquidators were a cheap source for getting one of those Aeron chairs my sore butt.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    9. Re:Liquidators vs Vultures by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      And one self-defense mechanism of a vulture is to vomit. -Extremely- nasty smelling stuff too. Don't make a vulture nervous, they're disgusting birds when they get riled up. :)

  11. Capitalism. by Raven42rac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This could be part of the "jobless economic recovery" that we have been hearing about. Seriously though, the $4,000 chairs and plasma monitors have to get sold by someone, right?

    --
    I hate sigs.
  12. An interesting point by Sklivvz · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article: 'Sherwood Partners "comes in and talks tough," said Doug Koo, who ran a failing San Francisco startup, Cat Technology. "They teach you that some of the things are a necessary evil."'

    In other words: "Your employees ain't doing shit, but do let some of them read Slashdot all day, it's a necessary evil" ;-)

  13. I predict.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    lol... and when was the last time you saw a Wall Street bigwig on TV saying "I predict stocks will go down this year." It's always "now is a grrreat time to buy stocks!!!

  14. The Walking Dead of ... India! by Channard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With so many IT call centre roles being outsourced to India, why not utilize India's Walking Dead. Specifically, there's an army - pun intended - of people who are considered legally dead in India due to corrupt officials declaring them dead so their relatives could get their hands on their land. I'm not making this up.. see this story

    1. Re:The Walking Dead of ... India! by kzadot · · Score: 1

      They are lucky. I bet they dont have to pay tax.

    2. Re:The Walking Dead of ... India! by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

      Taxes on what? They had all their land stolen from them, and I doubt dead people can be employed.

    3. Re:The Walking Dead of ... India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is Samir Nayeenanajar. My visa was recently expired and I returned back to Bombay after my employment at Innertrode. This was not a problem, since returning tech workers command very high salaries here. But I have been declared dead by the constable in my town. As a result, my land, my goat and my wife are considered available. My nephew has settled in my house and has taken my wife as his own. He has many friends who beat me if I go near my property. This is not a joking matter.

    4. Re:The Walking Dead of ... India! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


      A lot of colleagues of mine worked such long hours that their families just declared them dead anyway. No difference, except that they cashed in on the insurance (needed to make a living if the options weren't looking to pan out...)

      :-)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    5. Re:The Walking Dead of ... India! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      And with all those jobs gone to India we can raise a new army from the subequently swollen ranks of jobless americans, equip them with high tech weapons bought with all the money we save with the outsourcing of techjobs to India, and send the new Legions to clean up N-Korea. According to the CIA the jobless Geeks will come in handy for defusing the stack of A-Bombs Kim Il Song is sitting on. Unless of course they outsource that to India as well.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    6. Re:The Walking Dead of ... India! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...how's the goat doing?

  15. Came to my mind by carniz · · Score: 0, Funny

    Silicon Valley, was it? Just a thought - where is SCO located..?

    1. Re:Came to my mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even liquidators have some morals, don't they? - that and not to mention SCO isn't exactly walking dead, they're more like crawling on all fours looking for somebody to take down with them dead.

    2. Re:Came to my mind by EvilStein · · Score: 1, Funny

      In lovely Utah.

      Might as well be dead, it already looks like a barren wasteland. :P

  16. I would take his comments lightly... by mtrupe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This guy has an interest in tech companies going out of business. What is the difference between what he says and what the dot-commers were saying 3 years ago when they were constantly bragging about huge internet growth predictions?

    1. Re:I would take his comments lightly... by NineNine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The difference is that this guy has real business experience, and has been successful. Dot-commers wouldn't know how to run a business if they were given a "Business for Dummies" book. This guy has done what he's doing before. Most dot-commers were either fresh-out-of-school marketing types or design types. Huge difference.

    2. Re:I would take his comments lightly... by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True.

      Also, an important difference is that the guy is NOT trying to raise capital (AFAIK), which is the main incentive to overrate your market.

      Sure, such an article is a free ad and can't be bad for his business. But he has no desperate need to convince anyone that the market's gonna soar to gazillions.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    3. Re:I would take his comments lightly... by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Yet another point is that he predicts his business will trail off.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    4. Re:I would take his comments lightly... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he is trying to talk business down (just as Bush was accused of "talking down the economy" in 2000).

  17. Hostage Negotiators ARE needed! by sracer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you ever had to negotiate salary and benefits with management? I imagine that many of these companies will try to get of their obligations. These hostage negotiators can convince you that you're getting everything you are demanding... right before they slap the cuffs on you.

    Sounds like a perfect skills match to me. ;)

  18. Branch office possibilities by number6x · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe He'll open a branch office in Lindon Utah. That would be nice.

    1. Re:Branch office possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Funny, first I read:

      Maybe hell will open a branch office in Lindon Utah.

      Would be nice, too...

    2. Re:Branch office possibilities by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      And if we're lucky, his main client will be all of Canopy, not just SCO.

  19. Talking to people who don't want to listen by nuggz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hostage negotiation is getting people to listen and talk when they are feeling hostile towards you.

    Quite a useful skill if you have it.

    1. Re:Talking to people who don't want to listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have you by the balls, now listen to me..."

  20. Chapter 11 protection by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't know a huge amount about US company law, but it seems to me that a lot of firms over there that file for Chapter 11 protection eventually emerge from it and become successful again, so the system works if the fundamentals of the business are good. Here in Britain, once you're seen to be insolvent (however temporarily), 99% of the time you're completely fscked.

    The guy in the article has at least saved a decent proportion of his client firms; it's pretty rare here unless you get a management buyout (e.g. Rover Cars - not exactly a roaring success). Most of the time the firm just shuts down and gets asset stripped. Oh well, we've never had anything *quite* as big as Enron.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Chapter 11 protection by jj_johny · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But the guy's point is that there are tons of companies that even if you wiped out the debts, don't have enough cash or positive cash flow to make it in the long run. These companies are not going to get credit if they go through bankrupcy. Lots of these companies don't have significant debt anyway since they were VC funded - VC exchange funding for equity not debt.

      When I worked in Silicon Valley, there were tons of people who thought that they were smarter than they were, that theit product was better than it was and that the market was bigger than it is.

    2. Re:Chapter 11 protection by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      I have read that most companies that file for chapter 11 do not successfully emerge.

  21. There are signs, from the other side by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used to work for a rather large and well known national (US) retailer in their store operations division. One of my responsibilities was to deal with stores that were slated to close for any number of reasons, perhaps up to 30 a year. If a facility is due to close or upper management is thinking about this (ignore what they tell you - trust me), the one thing they will inevitably do is try to save money on something that won't be around. Executives simply can't resist the allure of saving these costs when they can "get away with it".

    The first place to save said money for a closing or may be closing facility is operational maintenence. These are the kinds of things that can function for a while before their lack of maintenence can be noticed. On a routine basis, it makes economic sense to do certain preventative and aesthetic work on a schedule. Maintenence and building engineers know this, and they know what tends to be put off in the event a building will be closing. While they may not get the official word first, they will almost always know that a facility is closing before someone like the executive secretary.

    Here is what to look for, even if you know your company is in healthy financial shape and that your facility is not about to close. Pay attention to these because the good times are not always so good.

    Parking lots striping, is the parking lot badly in need of painting those lines that tell everyone where to park? Parking lot potholes, are the only potholes that are fixed the massive ones?

    Paint on the walls, most businesses will paint their walls every x number of years, it saves money on electricity (brighter walls allows less light ergo less electric), and this is one of those subconcsious things that can reduce or enhance worker productivity.

    Electrician, does your facility have a dedicated electrian, and if it does, has he been deemed unneccasary? This is a big one, electricians aren't cheap, but their vital to maintaining a smooth facility.

    Light bulbs, most businesses don't wait for those overhead lights to burn out to change them. It costs too much in terms of time when you have thousands of them. It's cheaper to change them all at once over the holidays or the like before they burn out. This is done on a schedule, learn what this schedule is, for this is also a big one that is easily overlooked.

    HVAC, heating ventilation air conditioning. Preventative maintenence like coil cleaning can be put off for a while if you know the facility will be closing, but would never be put off otherwise. Coils are typicaly cleaned at least once a year in the spring, and you can seem them from the outside. HVAC equipment is extremely expensive to service and even more expensive to fix. This is a big one, pay attention to if units are working properly (not if your hot or cold).

    Carpet, this is less obvious since it can last longer, and sometimes a really cheap company is perfectly content to let 15 year old carpet remain in place regardless. This can be a red herring, but it bears watching.

    It is not uncommon for maintenence and building engineering people to feel that the people in their building are stuck up and pretentious, and as a result they will probably feel no need to warn the occupants of the coming closure. While the facilities people probably want nothing to do with you, your security and janitorial staff aren't so biased. They work with facility maintenence on a daily basis and they can often also get wind of what is coming up.

    1. Re:There are signs, from the other side by el_gordo101 · · Score: 4, Informative
      This poster makes some excellent observations. I went through a similar situation at supermarket chain I onced worked for. Other warning signs to look out for:

      • Drastic reductions in inventory/product orders
      • Price reductions (to clear inventory)
      • Cancellation/suspension of supply orders (cleaning products, packaging material, etc.)
      • Hiring freezes
      • Lowered standards in routine facility maintenence (cleaning, sanitation, etc.)
      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    2. Re:There are signs, from the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work for an HVAC controls contractor, so I see a lot of facility maintenance stuff all the time.

      First off, about the "coil cleaning"... The only coils that are *critical* are DX cooling coils. Those are the ones that sweat like a mofo and turn just about any kind of dust on them into concrete. Other coils aren't so picky. Electric heating coils generally burn themselves clean in a few minutes during first use.

      Second, you can't usually see coils from the outside of anything. Coils are almost always protected by filters. And dirty filters are nothing to worry about, really. They just cause nuisance problems with a unit, not massive breakdowns.

      Third, many companies don't maintain HVAC stuff except to repair it, usually because they're budgeted out for years on the stuff. Others just let rooftop air handlers go to pot because they're gonna drop a new one on there in a year or two.

      That said, I know of a company that we sell controls to that has a severe reluctance to update or repair their equipment right now for the exact reasons you spoke of. And to top it all off, some of the points on our system monitor things like "radioactive waste storage"!

    3. Re:There are signs, from the other side by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Thinking about it, I stand corrected on the coils being on seen on the outside of the units, that would more with residential units. As for cleaning, I'm not an HVAC person, I just provided tech support (first tech job) for them. Although I did get sent to Trane for additional night training. All the HVAC was networked and we would dial up to program and diagnose the units and help guide the contractors.

      The contractors I talked to on the phone indicated that coil cleaning was very common in the spring for the newbies or grunts who did just that. As for filters, the contractors I talked too all swore they worked better dirty - never did understand that one. I would hear horror stories about places like Kmart that let everything go to pot, used 80 degree set points and the like, but from what I understand most places are not like Kmart.

    4. Re:There are signs, from the other side by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then you get the OTHER extreme. One summer I got a temp job closing a plant, and moving the contents to another building. After the move, because I knew something about HVAC (Dad was a mechanic for, oh 35 years at the time, and I used to help him) they kept me on as an HVAC grunt

      This place maintianed their HVAC stuff like no other place I've ever seen. My Dad came in to visit, and he was impressed. 5 Machine rooms - year room had at least ONE spare "hot" compressor - piped in, but off, and idle. Open the valves for the water, and turn it on, and you were good to go. Tested at least once/month

      Each room had 2 towers - each could handle 75% of the hottest anticipated day. Most days, you could shut one tower with no problems. The company wanted the air clean and good in their building - we ran 50% fresh air - aka, we dumped half our air. ALL the air was filtered, and THEN electrostatic precipitated - even the warehouse!! No dust. due to the 50% fresh air, the building was at a fairly high positive pressue - we basically worked in a clean room! (Not a very clean one - but..). Every morning, after taking the basic readings, and bringing them to my boss, I grabbed a stack of towels, and clean all the machines - no oil drips, no dust - this was done 2x/day!!! The TILE (not concrete) floors in each machine room were swept daily, and stripped and waxed once/week! Spare parts were in bins, parts labeled, inventoried and the like. PM was done constantly. I swear, they used to keep the "Plant" cleaner than the public parts of most food stores or fast food places I've seen. The place was spotless

      I wonder why nothing ever broke down? (duh....)

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    5. Re:There are signs, from the other side by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever seen something like that was when I used to work security in a high profile skyscraper. %50 fresh air through the baffles, I've never heard of that, it's impressive. Sounds like a pretty tight ship, just curious, was the sup an ex-navy guy?

    6. Re:There are signs, from the other side by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      No idea - I was only there about 12 weeks - a long summer job, the summer before college

      The reason for such a tight ship was it was a watch company. The previous incarnation of that building was the watchmakers shop (they closed THAT a few months before I started), and they move the clock warehouse in. When they were building watches, the place HAD to be spotless, and it carried over

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    7. Re:There are signs, from the other side by wift · · Score: 1

      Pot Holes - check
      paint on walls - peeling & warped wood paneling - check
      we have electricians, carptenters ....
      Light bulbs - 45 out of 81 not working in this room
      HVAC - works good depending on the floor/room your in
      carpet - depends on what floor/room your in
      AND a 150 Million gap in the budget.

      Working in City Hall in Philadelphia ... priceless.

      --
      ....... Thus ends my attempt at wit or whatever
    8. Re:There are signs, from the other side by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Hm, at least they can't outsource city hall to India...

    9. Re:There are signs, from the other side by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Well, on the other hand sometime's it can be reasonable to postpone maintenance. Imagine a military in which 1/6 of all units are typically down for minor repairs. In the middle of a big offensive, one can postpone minor repairs in the short term in return for a better long-term strategic position. Ditto with companies: if skimping on building maintenance for a year or two can keep the company afloat long enough to start becoming a success, why not do it? Sure, there's a cost associated, but if it makes sense, it should be done.

    10. Re:There are signs, from the other side by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      if skimping on building maintenance for a year or two can keep the company afloat long enough to start becoming a success, why not do it? Sure, there's a cost associated, but if it makes sense, it should be done.
      I think that's the point he's trying to make.

      If your company is saying "we're doing fine", but skimping on long-term maintenence, it's a good warning sign that something is NOT fine. It doesn't mean the company is doomed.

      Another one I've noticed -- the water cooler. When the company stops getting water delivered, and starts refilling them with tap water, brush up your resume.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  22. Has SCO sent 7,000 letters? by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the article:" "There's still another 6,500 to 7,500 companies out there who are among the walking dead."....

    Last I heard SCO had sent only about a 1,000 letters or so; wiat a minute, does it mean SCO has 7,000 sister concerns or alibis??

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  23. Re:Chapter 11 vs. Ch 7 by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Informative

    it seems to me that a lot of firms over there that file for Chapter 11 protection eventually emerge from it and become successful again

    Yes, as explained here, Chapter 11 bankruptcies allow the company to reorganize and keep going. It is up a judge to decide if this is in the best interests of the creditors. If the company can make a good case that continuing the business would help them pay off more of the creditors, then that's the route they will go. Companies in chapter 11 can even get funding with debtor-in-possession deals that sign the assets of the company over to whoever is providing the money. Chapter 7 bankrupties (more like true bankruptcies) liquidate the assets of the company and divide the procedes among the creditors.

    With both types of bankrupties the creditors get pennies on the dollar and the shareholders get nothing.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  24. Could someone check that TinyURL link? by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 1

    I'm at work, and I don't want to accidentally trip over something that could get me fired. Thanks!

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    1. Re:Could someone check that TinyURL link? by guyo26 · · Score: 1

      yeah, you definitely don't want to be clicking on that link at work. lets just say consumption junction, ok?

    2. Re:Could someone check that TinyURL link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's tubgirl

  25. Ghost town! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Funny you should mention it, but it's pretty spooky around here now. Driving around, I see all around me empty buildings and "For Lease" signs everywhere. Go by the old 3Com/Palm building and the parking lot is just empty, (well, almost empty). Run over to AMD (Spansion, it's called now)and most of the buildings have been vacated, once again, "For Lease" sign proliferate everywhere. While we're in the neighborhood, we can stop by Fry's and find the store mostly empty, where we used to be able to find all the tech-heads here during lunch hour. D2 (Intel) seems to be ok, meaning it's still hard to find a parking space during the day. Many other companies such as LSI Logic, HMT, HP, Read-Rite, and others have been bought out by another company and liquidated, gone by the wayside and closed up shop, or just relocated and combined operations elsewhere.
    The traffic also shows a dramatic change as well. What used to take me about 2 hours to get home to the Central Valley, I can usually make it in just over an hour, oddly enough, the worst is when I get to Tracy, wjere everyone seems to have moved (It's become a bustling little city, which I woulda never imagined growing up near there back in the 70's.
    Back from the minor digression, It seems sad to me that the whole valley has become fairly lifeless and droll, considering this was where the whole technological revolution began. Thinking optimistically, this may only be a temporary condition until the next great advancement. Or things have just settled down from the great boom of the 90's and are back to normal. I guess we'll see.

    Posted AC because, well, it doesn't matter.

    1. Re:Ghost town! by taradfong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I took a look at buying some real estate in San Jose, and 75% of the sellers were out of luck engineers who're moving out of the area. Real estate up the peninsula (like Redwood City and San Carlos) seems to be holding on, probably buoyed by interest rates. However the rental market is WAY down, you can rent a house that used to go for $3500 a month for $2300, and you can take your time thinking about it.

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
    2. Re:Ghost town! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I took a look at buying some real estate in San Jose, and 75% of the sellers were out of luck engineers who're moving out of the area.

      You realize that it might be like investing in Detroit. Then again, at least San Jose has nice weather.

    3. Re:Ghost town! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think part of the situation in the Valley is that companies figured out that you don't need to be there to be successful, and in fact it's darn cheaper to locate somewhere else. The Denver area is really popular with former Silicon Valley companies, in particular. Chicago is also popular with all the wireless and telecom stuff that's been there a while. They're not booming quite like the Valley did in the 90's, but there are companies moving in.

      I think when the bust finally recovers and tech comes back (though it probably won't be the huge boom it once was), we will have little mini-tech-centers around the country rather than one huge one in California.

    4. Re:Ghost town! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      San Jose will never become like Detroit BECAUSE of its weather. It will become another resort/luxury town like Palm Beach.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:Ghost town! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not really, because anyone who wants "resort/luxury" will move to San Francisco or Santa Cruz. In 10 years both those towns will have have finished their conversion to "playgrounds of the rich".

      San Jose is an ugly smog-filled shithole valley suburb (with no beaches). It's more like San Bernadino than Palm Springs (or Palm Beach). It started as an industrial backwater, and that's where it's going to.

    6. Re:Ghost town! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      San Jose will never become like Detroit BECAUSE of its weather. It will become another resort/luxury town like Palm Beach.

      You mean a place for rich foreigners to play.

    7. Re:Ghost town! by Cyno · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I heard one of the execs of LSI Logic recently bought himself a nice multi-million dollar home in the Los Altos hills, 23,000 sq ft.

      Its a good thing all his employees lost their jobs and had to leave town. Makes traffic on 280 so much more pleasant.

    8. Re:Ghost town! by taradfong · · Score: 1

      I agree with your assessment of SJ, but disagree on SF or SC. Rich people like golf courses, easy parking and exclusivity. SF is crowded, in-your-face radical, inconvenient and unfriendly to old people. There are beaches but they're crowded and more the kind you look at than spend time on. SC is all these things too and is largely infected with irritating college students. Neither town is friendly to any kind of construction, either. Most of the wealth is going to Florida, especially given CA's oppressive taxes.

      Don't get me wrong, I love SC, SF and even SJ a bit. But if I was filthy rich, I'd be on Coronado Island!

      --
      Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  26. Re:Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sam Emerson: My own brother a goddamn, shit-sucking vampire! Oh, you wait 'til mom finds out buddy.

  27. Simpsons Reference by cbovasso · · Score: 1

    "This is the golden age of the repo-man" *burns $100 bill to light his cigar*

    --
    I ask for a car and I get a computer. How's about that for being born under a bad .sig?
  28. First meeting of the W.D.A. (AA affiliate) by slim+hades · · Score: 0

    My names Slim Hades, and I work for a company who's lifespan is about out. It is from years of previous Network Engineers doing half-arsed things with Wi-Fi and basically turning a great WISP opportunity into a money pit. Sigh. Just when I found a career I like. Really, though, it's sad because as an employee of the WDA, it makes it hard to find pride in what you do when:

    1.) You know in a year it won't even be around

    2.) Every cool idea or new thing you think of is only good for your own personal satisfaction, and geeky braging rights, should you choose to exercise them.

    It's nice to have a great enviroment to learn, but not when it's hostile.

    Group Hug?

    1. Re:First meeting of the W.D.A. (AA affiliate) by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't notice the warning signs. During the job interview they asked me "Where do you see yourself in five weeks?"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  29. Send 'em to Lindon, Utah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard a vague rumor or two of a desperate, failing company located there....

  30. Liquidators are getting worried... by gorfie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like somebody is a little worried that their lucrative business of stalking dying companies won't be quite so lucrative in the near future. So he now proclaims that times will still be bad in an attempt to stifle spending by consumers and companies, thus furthing this slump that we're in.

    This reminds me of the Simpsons episode where Bart joins an Internet company and they die at the end of the episode as Bart is confronted by a repo guy lighting his cigar with dollar bills.

    1. Re:Liquidators are getting worried... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      "But it's a golden age for the repo industry... One that will never end"

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  31. You forgot to mention... by Channard · · Score: 1

    .. the huge amount of money you have resting in a bank account that you need our help to get at, in return for a percentage. Oh, wait, that all went to Milton..

  32. It's rather difficult by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    To liquidate a company with no debt and to teh effect of $50 Billion in cash.

    Remember, liquidators do just that: liquidate assets. If your company is failing to make money, has a lot of debt, and is going under, you'll need to liquidate (sell them for cash) to try and pay off your creditors.

    They don't go after companies that make money but espically not ones that make money and have money. Even if MS starts loosing money, they have no outstanding debt so they don't have to worry. They'd have to burn through their cash reserves before there'd be any problems.

  33. According to Inc Magazine by UrgleHoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This article
    states that 4 out of 5 new businesses fail is a myth. Take it for what its worth, another opinion.

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    1. Re:According to Inc Magazine by UrgleHoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's another article on small/new business failure rates.

      Or do the google search yourself.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  34. Of course.. by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 2, Funny

    The repo business is in a golden age, one that will never end! So when is this guy's IPO coming out?

  35. Yet another ad posing as a news story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So this guy does "business process reorganization" or whatever it's called this second. That's way more of an empty career than even being involved in a "Walking Dead" business is.

    These guys are only half a step above cult leaders and gurus, and their entire job consists of being professional scapegoats. Show me one who has ever recommended to cut the salaries of executives... you can't. Their ultimate conclusions are always to get rid of bottom-rung personnel. I don't think you need a third party to come up with that bit of genius to help your company along... you just need an executor to pose as the motivation for the decision.

  36. Moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like it, or think it's corny.. just ignore it. Don't be a karma-tanking chodesmoking asshead.

    Or at least use a moderation that can be metamoderated. Unless you're afraid of something.

  37. Not far off... by gmby · · Score: 1

    I just bought a new box of ten 18G SCSI drives for $11.50each. That's 63cents a Gig!

    RAID the right way!
    We don't need no stinking IDE!

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    1. Re:Not far off... by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Dude! Where? Are they Compaq Ultra 3(20)?

      --
      I hate sigs.
    2. Re:Not far off... by gmby · · Score: 1

      Nah... Just lowly IBM SCAs. Best speed is 40MB/s. Good for redundant/array; not good for video/speed.

      Got them on ebay of course. Search for "corpsys" user.

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  38. True dat by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I can get from Walnut Creek to Mountain View via 680 & 242 in less than an hour. That's a 55 mile commute!
    Getting home is usually an hour to an hour and a half, depending on how many traffic catastrophes have occured on 680. :)

    1. Re:True dat by KGIS · · Score: 1

      Do you make this commute every day? What would justify a daily commute like this? Are housing prices that rediculous in the area?
      I can't imagine any long term job that would want to make me drive this far to work every day. I currently live about 10 miles or so from work and it usually takes long enough to get home. I get frustrated enough when it takes me 40 minutes to get home after a huge snow storm when people forget how to drive a car (gotta love those Canadian winters).

    2. Re:True dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are housing prices that rediculous in the area?

      Yes, believe it or not, they still are. That person is probably paying quite a bit less (in rent or whatever) in the East Bay area than he would be in Silicon Valley.

      Aside: I feel your snow-related pain. I experience the same thing in beautiful Michigan.

    3. Re:True dat by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      I did until I got laid off last week. :) And a few things justify it..
      1)My fiancee has a good job that is less than 5 miles away.
      2)Her son goes to school less than 1 mile away.
      3)My fiancee's cat is kind of old...

      It would be very disruptive to move from where we are now. Traffic is just a way of life in the Bay Area.
      Public transportation is simply not an option.. it takes 3 hours each way.
      And yes, housing prices are WAY out of control in this area.. average home price is like $550,000. I think they're way inflated...

    4. Re:True dat by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Millions of Americans make commutes this long or even longer everyday.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:True dat by BrianH · · Score: 1

      A LOT of people make that commute. I used to work in San Jose and live in Ripon (a little town in the Central Valley), easily a 1.5 to 2 hour daily commute. Why did I work in San Jose? For the $90k+ yearly paychecks. Why do I live in Ripon? Because I was able to buy a 2800sf 4/3 here five years ago for about $180,000, and a comparable home in the Bay Area would have set me back $600,000 easily.

      Of course, I decided to simplify my life a couple of years ago and gave up my cushy $90k a year San Jose job for a $43k a year government gig about 10 minutes from home. Not everyone is willing to give up half their income to eliminate their commute, however.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    6. Re:True dat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would justify a daily commute like this?

      The main reasons are (1) Geography and (2) Greenbelt Planning.

      Unlike a typical metroplex where housing can grow in whatever direction it feels like, the Bay Area is ridiclously constrained by a bay and mountains.

      The things that rack up commute times are the bridges and the fact there's only 2 routes out to the central valley.

    7. Re:True dat by comedian23 · · Score: 1

      I commute very near the other people responding and there is litterally no choice around here. Either you live close to your work and pay $3000/month in mortage or you commute for an hour plus. Otherwise you rent for $1100-1800/month. That is the Bay Area. Luckily my company lets me come in early so I beat the morning traffic and can leave before it gets really bad at night.

      -Comedian

    8. Re:True dat by cubicleman · · Score: 1

      That's a standard commute in many places, not just California. We have it here also in Colorado. I used to commute 60 miles each way to work (from Colorado Springs to Denver). I now live in Denver, and have several coworkers doing 40-60 mile (each way) commutes. That is the reality of the current job market (the market in the Springs is dead for non military work).

    9. Re:True dat by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Of course, I decided to simplify my life a couple of years ago and gave up my cushy $90k a year San Jose job for a $43k a year government gig about 10 minutes from home. Not everyone is willing to give up half their income to eliminate their commute, however.

      How much of that money then goes into the car? Into gas? And does your time have no value? That would be 3-4 hours out of EVERY day that I would have to give up to sit in traffic, and there's no way that $40k a year could be worth that much to me. My time is precious to me, and earning a nice paycheck is useless if I have no time to spend enjoying it.

  39. liquidators spend money in the economy... by freejamesbrown · · Score: 2, Funny

    same difference.
    m.

  40. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tubgirl troll in .sig.

  41. A Strategic Investment viewpoint by BritGeek · · Score: 1
    In the late nineties, I supported the Strategic Investment group of my employer (a large financial services company), by doing Technical Due Diligence on the various companies that they were thinking of investing in. I have also witnessed what's happened to our own investment portfolio since then. It seems to me that there are a few things going on here, that some of the other posters seem to be muddling together:

    1. The companies with obviously daft business models, who managed to get funded on the late nineties, have all faded away. Good riddance to bad rubbish, largely.
    2. The companies with solid business models are making money quite nicely. They will presumably do even better as the economy continues to improve.
    3. There are however, a number of companies in an intermediate state. They are hanging on (sometimes by the skin of their teeth), in the hopes that as the economy improves, so will their sales. If that doesn't occur, then these companies will be continued grist to the shutdown mill...
    --
    "The time is always now" - Victor
  42. Very . . . . Painfull . . . by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This story was painfull to think about. I am 23 years old, I have been laid off 5 times, 3 of those companies don't exsist any longer.

    • Directv BroadBand
    • Transport Logic (Bought by Firstworld, who is no longer around I believe)
    • Encompass Telesystems (Didn't even make it to having a web presence)
    5 layoffs in 5 years. I live in fear, but have become bitter and jaded. I expect a layoff to come at any time. Especially since I work at Intel now.
    1. Re:Very . . . . Painfull . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA!

    2. Re:Very . . . . Painfull . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      5 layoffs in 5 years. I live in fear, but have become bitter and jaded.

      Wow, you're doing great! It took me over 20 years in IS to become bitter and jaded. You're way ahead of most techies...

    3. Re:Very . . . . Painfull . . . by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

      Dude... I know what you mean.

      I was fortunate to work for Digital Equipment Corp in its heyday (80's); they paid me well, and regularly sent me to training in great hotels, with per diem. When you're treated like a valued member over a long period, in a non-adversarial environment, it gives a permanent sense of inner confidence. But I know what it would have been like in your circumstance.

      Just know that things are less stable these days, with the Bush Economy II; it is not you. Graduate education, curiousity, and always learning, are the keys to inner confidence today, no matter who you're in a meeting with.

      --
      Campaign finance reform is national security.
    4. Re:Very . . . . Painfull . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graduate education, curiousity, and always learning, are the keys to inner confidence today

      I noticed that you said "inner confidence" which is 100% right. Its no guarantee to make money as Indians will work for 1/10th your price.

    5. Re:Very . . . . Painfull . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding dude. I'm almost 30, and I feel outdated. I've had to resort to doing something I wouldn't have done: getting certifications.

      Here's some interesting thoughts about your job from Carly (the bitch running HP) and Craig Barrett:

      "There is no job that is America's God-given right anymore," said Carly Fiorina, chairman of Palo Alto information technology giant Hewlett Packard.

      http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/200 4/ 01/08/MNGDI45PV01.DTL&type=tech

      Good luck man, I feel for you.

    6. Re:Very . . . . Painfull . . . by chundo · · Score: 1

      And I'm guessing that using company internet access to read Slashdot probably isn't getting you any brownie points.

      -j

  43. Microsoft's assets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand -- if Microsoft got hit with the punitive damages they richly deserve those assets would be wiped out in an instant. Well a guy can dream can't he?

    1. Re:Microsoft's assets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, nothing would make my life better than seeing MS go down in flames. I'm going to base my entire happiness on this single fact, because it involves me so much.

  44. Ah ha! by mormop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pichinson, a self-described "doctor of reality" who helps liquidate companies, says he wouldn't have moved from Los Angeles to Palo Alto a few months ago had he not smelled more high-tech trouble looming....

    If any real estate agents sell this guy a place in Lindon, Utah around 2005 can they post the news on /.

    Cheers

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  45. SCO! SCO! SCO! by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Something I could never stand about Santa Cruz, all the goddamn living undead bloodsuckers!

    Whoops, they're in Utah these days, aren't they?AAA

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:SCO! SCO! SCO! by ndrw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can't tell you how many geeks here in Santa Cruz are appalled at the behavior of a company that uses our cities name. I guess that would go double or triple for the ones who used to work there!

  46. 90% within 2 yrs - before dot-com by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, the numbers I kept hearing, well before the dot-com lunacy, was that 90% of new businesses go bankrupt within two years. A surprising number of friends and acquaintances started up in the 80's and 90's and repeated this number as well (BTW they're all in business except one, who cashed in and got out.)

    However, that said, it would interesting to see some reliable figures. Funny how it's run full circle - 'dot-com' started out as a pejorative, was the latest rage, and is now a pejorative again.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  47. I blame the V. C.s by Darth23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of the dot com babies were pushed to expand by their venture capatilists, who didn't really care about the companies' long term health. Momentum, expand, expand, expand, get more funding, get some press, then do the ipo so that the VCs can cash out.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    1. Re:I blame the V. C.s by sgt101 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Don't kick the Baby!

      Ok VC's are evil, we hate them, they stole our company, they were nasty to us when we pitched, they were nasty when the company ran, they were nasty when the company folded...

      VC's are mostly: clever; honest; brutal; gamblers. Ok, it's not a great set of characteristics, but they're like sharks, not fun to play with in the pool, but noble beasts by their own lights. Don't hate them for what they are!!! All the VC's I have dealt with have been straight with me "it's our money, it's our company, you will do what we say, if it goes wrong we blame you, your ideas and you lose." not nice, but honest.

      Most people who take VC funding do it for one of three reasons:

      they have to or they will be bust in a month; this means that they have already lost their company and just hope for a few more paychecks and a reasonable pay off in the best case

      they are in a strong position, they want to expand, they are quick hard and clever and have a strong enough cash position not to have to take a follow up deal (that will kill their stake)

      they read stories about how dumb VC's are just handing out money for free. They think that the VC's are dumb and that the VC's will get ripped off, by them... oh dear, oh dear...

      The reality is that venture funds have to make money and the successes (Amazon, eBay, yahoo) of the last tech wave have paid for the failures. I would love to see the sums though but I imagine that the investment in Amazon has paid for hundereds of misfires..... My point is that driving companies to ipo or a trade sale (much preferred) is not evil; who knows what the health of a company after 5 years will be in any case?

      --
      --------------------------------------------- "In the end, we're all just water and old stars."
    2. Re:I blame the V. C.s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people who take VC funding do it for one of three reasons:

      You forgot: "Because the VC will give you a cut of their IPO scam, making you rich".

      Many many dotcom "founders" walked away with millions of dollars in the bank. Do they care if the VC flushed their good idea? No! Because now if they want to start their own company without outside capital, they are in the perfect position to do so.

  48. "The Walking Dead" is a great concept by the0ther · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I hope to use that meme more frequently in my deepest moments of spacing out. I do believe there are so many walking dead amongst us that we subconsciously block them out of our perceptions. This line of thinking would justify my belief that the United States economy really is in the shitter, we just suffer from irrational exhuberance. Something has got to give.

    1. Re:"The Walking Dead" is a great concept by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

      I think John Edwards and Campaign Finance Reform is the key.

      --
      Campaign finance reform is national security.
  49. AllAdvantage.com... hehehe by dave1g · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh how I use to love that site lol...

    I would get a 20 dollar check every month just for running that ad banner thing at night.

    I cant believe there are any of those paid to surf companies still around.

    Anyone who uses them are the people that can break the rules, or they are just the massive pyramid scheemer guys that host websites for the sole purpose of refering people to such site so they get x percentages of whatever their referers do.

  50. I thought Hostage Negotiation was about by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    ...getting the guy with the gun to stand in front of a window so that the smipers can get a clear shot.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  51. What is happening in Silicon Valley by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Firms that went public in 1999 have been living off of their IPO money instead of income. Thats fine - thats the idea (for a while), but these firms are facing a market that is moving towards massive commoditization and thinner margins.

    The software biz is just beginning to enter a phase of massive consolidation and commoditization just as these firms need to show strong revenues. I must agree with Larry Ellison's self-serving comments that 80% of the software firms have no future.

    This will impact Silicon Valley, which contrary to reports has not really generated much in the way of new industry in the last few years...the area is in fact turning more and more to the large firms (Adobe, Yahoo, Oracle, Cisco, Intel, Applied Materials etc) to shore up the local economy.

    But, for anyone who wants to start a new business, I can't imagine a city with more commercial real estate on the market. Take your pick!

  52. Staffing still an issue by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Depending on the type of firm you are starting, you are not going to be able to find a pool of labor in Idaho that matches Silicon Valley. Maybe VB programmers, but not hardware/optical/deep software type stuff.

    1. Re:Staffing still an issue by RicoX9 · · Score: 1

      There are PLENTY of places FAR cheaper to be than anywhere in California. These places include a good pool of potential employees, friendly business enviornments, transportation hubs. Atlanta and Raleigh come to mind.

      Hell, California taxes alone would be enough to convince me to change coasts. Atlanta and Raleigh aren't cheap, but pretty much everything looks cheap compared to Silicon Valley (even afer the dot-bomb).

      I live a couple hours outside Atlanta. I know plenty of people that would be happy to have better (or any) jobs there.

      I fail to understand the HUGE disconnect that people have about starting a business and having to be in California. The state isn't stable. Taxes are outrageous. Cost of living is truly unbelievable (I have an uncle that lives in Palo Alto). I also have a friend that drives over 2 hrs (40+ miles) to work in San Jose because he can't afford to live anywhere near there.

    2. Re:Staffing still an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One area that seems untapped is the Phoenix metro area. Cost of living is cheap (way cheaper than here (Denver area)), great climate, close to California, great airport, freeways, etc...

    3. Re:Staffing still an issue by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      2 hrs to go 40 miles? Oh, the pleasure of living in rural America. Ten miles, 15 minutes tops, if the two traffic lights are against me. An occasional stop, once in awhile, to let the cows cross.

      Granted, the -25F tonite is a bit much.

    4. Re:Staffing still an issue by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised. When I moved to Minnesota from the East coast a few years ago, the locals asked me why I would come here, imagining it must be so much more glamourous in the NYC area. But it really is much nicer here. More and more people are moving to the Midwest because we're tired of the insane cost of housing (I came from S/W CT with a background in hardware & software design), the dog-eat-dog pace of life and just the overall busy-ness of it all. You also find employers offering generous relocation benefits since there is a perception that this area is "flyover country" and no one wants to move here.
      Since coming here I've met others who just liked the easy access to wilderness and outdoor life; not everyone wants to live in a big city. And like others, I've found the Twin Cities area as lively and artsy enough for me to want to continue living here.
      For me the draw was that people were nicer, there is so much outdoors stuff available, and I could own my own home and pay for it with a fairly small percentage of my salary.

      You are partly right of course: tech centric cities will always have high concentrations of people with broad skill bases making it easier to find staff, but even outside those areas you will find a lot of intelligent, highly motivated people who just want what they perceive as a better quality of life in a more slow-paced area of the country.

    5. Re:Staffing still an issue by cubicleman · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are many positive qualities to the Midwest. I'm from a small town in Eastern Ohio and lived in the Cleveland area, Ann Arbor, Michigan (I loved Ann Arbor), and Chicago before moving to Colorado 7 years ago. The #1 reason I don't see myself moving back to the Midwest is the generally horrible climate--dark gloomy damp cold winters, hot and sticky summers.

    6. Re:Staffing still an issue by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      yeah it's miserable, but other than the occasional tornado, we don't have earthquakes, hurricanes, or major flooding up here...it's pretty calm.

    7. Re:Staffing still an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can leave now and take your overpriced, poorly-built housing (Californians mostly did this one) -- and your traffic jams (too damn many people, not enough roads) with you.

      We used to have nice affordable housing made out of brick, and decent commute times from anywhere in the city. All you jackasses with out-of-state license plates moved here without jobs and/or taking jobs away from those who didn't go to East Coast schools, and you wonder why the economy here keeps getting worse when you tell your buddies to come too... "Hey it's great out here!"

      You're breathing up all of our oxygen. Go back where you came from.

      If given a choice between buying a product service from a native or from someone who moved here in the last decade... I'll choose the locals.

      And no, I don't stop and help when I see all your silly asses in the ditch during small snowstorms. Learn how to drive in the damn snow, please... or get out.

      (Hint: 4-wheel-drive does not help you brake quickly. As grandpa used to teach... if you can't get there in 2-wheel-drive, don't go. 4-wheel-drive is for emergencies to get you HOME, not get you to somewhere you're not.)

  53. droll by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 1

    I don't think you know what droll means. Nice post, otherwise.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  54. Yes, but... by taradfong · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure, a few smart guys in a garage will always outmanuevre a mound of VCs and suits. Thing is, the VCs don't care about small potatoes, even very well run and profitable small potatoes. They want big potatoes. They have A LOT of money to manage and they need a MAJOR payoff to make it worth their while. This kind of company doesn't 'scale' in their minds.

    And this is really why the .com thing came and went. The VCs (and Wall Street), who have the money, created an evironment which led to lots of 'fluff' in the form of huge headcounts, 'internet presences' and above all, growth (profits be damned!). Heck, they essentially automated the creation of companies very much like the music industry automates the creation of music (ok, write a business plan, get a valuation, hire, make a website, etc.).

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  55. My own saga. by rjh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My own employment history's likewise:
    • MCI-WorldCom: in Chapter 11
    • McLeodUSA: in Chapter 11
    • Exemplary Technologies: Chapter 7, CEO did time in Club Fed
    • Network Associates: the division I was at got annihilated
    ... I'm currently in graduate school because I've come to the belief that the Industry is just not worth it. Whenever I hear HR reps talking about how they're irked that young engineers have no company loyalty and will abandon ship for the next good offer to come along, I want to shake them vigorously and shout that we've got no loyalty to employers because it's been proven the employer has no loyalty to us.

    I'm 29, and I want out.
    1. Re:My own saga. by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Very good point. I have had only one company make me feel welcome, and that is Siemens Business Services. In return, I have loyalty to them. I was laid off a few years ago, but wiggled my way back in. I am back at Siemens, working at Intel. I know that if Intel tosses me, Siemens will continue to employ me and find me somewhere else to go.

      Also, they recognised my stellar efforts in previous contracts. I did some emergency contract work 3 times, and 3 times i was given a very small raise. That helped me when I applied for a position here later. I applied for one position, but was given a much better position after they looked up my history with the company.

      Man I wish more tech businesses were run like this.

      I might also add that I live in the 'Silicon Forest' of Portland/Beaverton/Hillsboro Oregon USA. Still maintaining the highest unemployment rate in the 50 states!

    2. Re:My own saga. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      After you shake them, give them a couple bitch-slaps for me too.

      Yes, I don't see how they cannot see that there's no loyalty because they aren't loyal to their workers. Competition works for employers but it also works for employees too.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  56. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moderators, it appears, did not understand recursion of humor...

  57. real walking dead not planning any changes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they think they'll be in 'business' long after they've turned US into even further debt & disruption?

    the real felonious execrable will be polluting the airwaves with their self-adulating payper liesense stock markup fraud hypenosys, right up until the big flash.

  58. That article is about right by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I predicted the dot-com collapse with Downside's Deathwatch. Most of the companies listed have went out of business long ago. The remaining ones are mostly just hanging on, with stock prices in the penny-stock range. They're examples of the living dead. Internet America (GEEK) is still around, with the stock around $1 and 82,000 customers left in Texas and Louisiana. Claimsnet.com (CLAI) is at $0.38. There are others. Even after downsizing, the bad-idea companies tend to remain unprofitable. But some of them raised enough money to continue losing at a very modest level for years.

    Silicon Valley has many non-public companies that are quietly dying. Often it's not their fault; they were support companies for the semiconductor industry, which has moved elsewhere.

    I've been reading "The End of Detroit", on how the US auto industry blew their market share. I see many parallels to Silicon Valley. Auto manufacturing hasn't been centered in Detroit for years now. Detroit, as a city, is a ghost town. The population is half of what it was at peak. See The Fabulous Ruins of Detroit. That could happen here.

  59. Gold rush is over. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I guess the archetypical US's Wild West ghost town after the gold dried out had the same feeling.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  60. when they say "walking dead" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they were referring to Darl McBride and the SCO clan.

  61. obligatory poke: by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
    "I wonder what this will have done to his stock price."

    ...depends: Has he sued any big companies and sent out a zillion invoices?

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  62. Why doesn't this surprise more people? by mabu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of the failed tech companies had doomed business models in the first place. Rather than plan for a conservative, common-sense approach, they opted for the "whore model" where they gave out products and services at a loss, thinking that at some point they would later get customers to pay. Even companies like Amazon.com, that has whored itself out and hemmoraged money since day one, with substantive market share, still can't quite figure out how to turn things around so the company is on solid ground.

    There are still a lot of solid, tech companies that are growing, but these are companies that didn't dine on the magic mushrooms being handed out by VCs and other people who were only in it for the short-term payoff at the expense of shareholders, the greedy public and their common sensibilities.

    As the owner of a successful "dot com", I deal with customers every day who wonder why I don't charge "whore" prices for hosting and other services. And they wonder why their cheap-ass services blink on and off or the company they've chosen isn't around a few months later? It used to be that businesses were afraid of dealing with small Internet companies for fear they wouldn't be around or would leave them hanging. Now it's the other way around: they don't trust the big companies, and rightly so!

  63. Yikes! by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    I just moved to Sunnyvale, unaware of the zombie infestation.

    I guess I should just stay in my apartment.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  64. then go to an exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    non-smoking restaurant/bar, you fucking faggot. You probably tongue Robert Reiner in the asshole.

  65. Remember Xodus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those clowns burned through $3 billion in cold hard cash!

    What total imbeciles, gross excessive "bloat" on hosting services which basically requires an empty space with a fiber optic backbone connection coming through the wall.

    Instead Xodus had bullet proof glass, man traps, armed security guards, kevlar reinforced walls, etc.

    What morons, spend all their money on fluff and when bankrupt!

    Typical attitude of Palo Alto nuts with their heads in the clouds!

    LOL

  66. True by flamelord · · Score: 0
    In fact there are so many lies and ill deeds that I have plain lost count and am no longer really keeping track. It's a great excercise for really jogging your brain though. However, I am keeping up with the near present; the current White House theme seems to be to rape the entire middle class, including the upper middle class. The "manageable" deficits are in fact quite manageable if you keep the printing presses rolling (which we are forced to do, since no sane foreigner will buy US treasuries at interest rates which dwarf the devaluation of the dollar by orders of magnitude--you really would have to be quite insane).

    What's great for the Bushies is that they can brag about the wonderful economic growth (in terms of dollar figures). However, if you look at the US growth in terms of actual currencies (that will be worth something in the near future) then we are actually in a economic contraction. So we can expect great growth, and rosy numbers in 2004, for sure. >8% growth perhaps, isn't it great? yeah...uhm.. great.

    This is also not neccessarily a terrible thing for irresponsible idiots who run up their credit cards or take out a huge mortgage, nor for the corporate equivalent, high debt companies (some of which are the walking silicon valley zombies) or those that are writing non-investment grade bonds. I am not concerned about them; these groups have their own (often intractable) problems and besides their parasitic effects, they are irrelevant to those of us that really matter; I am largely talking about the entire middle class citizens.

    For most people the growing federal debt is a very bad thing, and this is especially true for the young generation in their 30's who have been dedicated to prudently saving up for retirement for 20 years into the future. You people had better seriously consider how to protect yourselves (give as much thought as you can spare, and do it as soon as you can).

    For the younger ones starting their career, or for those who have, for the most part, put off saving, but aren't happy with the way things are going in your country, my advice is to look for an exit strategy. Start saving up, be look into moving to another country which will not rape you into slavery, and look for a better future; this isn't how things are supposed to be. I really have empathy for people like the previous poster, because I know so many of us are in the same boat, but aren't quite sure what the right thing is. We think and hope this country can be saved, but it prudent to always have an exit strategy (yeah, like that Noah guy in the bible).


    ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS PRESIDENT:

    I invaded and occupied two countries at a continuing cost of over one billion dollars per week.

    I spent the US surplus and effectively bankrupted the US Treasury.

    I shattered the record for the largest annual deficit in US history.

    I set an economic record for most private bankruptcies filed in any 12-month period.

    I set the all-time record for the biggest drop in the history of the US stock market.

    I am the first president in US history to enter office with a criminal record.

    I set the all-time record for most days on vacation in any one year period.

    After taking-off the entire month of August, I presided over the worst security failure in U.S. history.

    I am supporting development of a nuclear "Tactical Bunker Buster," a WMD.

    In my State Of The Union Address, I lied about our reasons for attacking Iraq, then blamed the lies on our British friends.

    I set the record for most campaign fundraising trips by a US president.

    In my first year in office over 2-million Americans lost their jobs and that trend continues every month.

    I set the all-time record for most foreclosures in a 12-month period.

    I appointed more convicted criminals to administration than any president in US history.

    I set the record for least amount of press conferences than any president s

  67. Only small companies can survive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only small companies can survive. Like this one http://www.synergeticsoft.com

  68. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think the moderators have a great sence of humor. Recursion is redundant! I know, it's not as funny after you explain it. It's the funniest mod I've ever seen. Worth the cost of one karma point. They are free to anyone willing to take the time to write a good comment.

  69. I worked with you? by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1

    "They did not understand the concept of "do something, do anything to get started", including low-level use of free technology, such as improvised websites and initial customers, preferring to plan for pie-in-the-sky everything-must-be-perfect-before-we-move. Did we work together? Yours failed for the same reasons the dotcom startup I was with failed ... they weren't content with having a decent product. The founder stalled and waffled and never committed to anything. He could have had a really good system for the Fortune 5,000,000 (the millions of small businesses) but he had visions of being a Fortune 500 supplier and failed at it.