Slashdot Mirror


You Are Here (On Earth)

Anonymous Coward writes "NY Times today has an essay about a map of the entire universe produced by two Princeton astronomers using a variety of data including the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Its view begins with the Earth at the bottom and extends back almost to the Big Bang at the top, including such objects as the Sloan Great Wall, 1.37 billion light-years long. The map can be found here."

332 comments

  1. I can see my house... by Karl+Prince · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see my house...

    --

    mailto:EatSpamAndDie@princeweb.com
    1. Re:I can see my house... by mainframemouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me too, though mines on Betelgeuse.

    2. Re:I can see my house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that you, Ford, you hoopy frood?

    3. Re:I can see my house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I wish I had a weapon.

    4. Re:I can see my house... by TehHustler · · Score: 1

      Mine's there, but some arsehole is about to knock it down to build some kind of by-pass.

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    5. Re:I can see my house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe I thought about the same thing. Warcraft II rules! :)

      MOD PARENT UP

    6. Re:I can see my house... by balbord · · Score: 1

      It's your own fault! You've never been to Alpha Centauri? Oh, for heaven's sake, mankind, it's only four light years away, you know!!

      --
      "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
    7. Re:I can see my house... by xmas2003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you want to see some pretty darn cool pictures of MY house, check out these satellite photo's of my house.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    8. Re:I can see my house... by corian · · Score: 1

      perfect! now all we have to do is fill your living room with popcorn, and...

  2. I'm here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great.. but where the hell are the restrooms?

    1. Re:I'm here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Above the mantel, but below the mesosphere. And pretty much all of New Jearsy.

    2. Re:I'm here.. by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Obvious:
      http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjuric/universe/p3 .100.gif

      Noone around to see you, you see?

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    3. Re:I'm here.. by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 1

      Mostly in Australia.

      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    4. Re:I'm here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the restaurant??

  3. She canna take any more captain!! by kiwioddBall · · Score: 2, Funny

    With 500k graphical images to download you can be sure that by the time you read this you are too late - its been slashdotted!!

  4. Google is your friend! by TheMidget · · Score: 3, Informative

    A usual with the NYT, Google is your friend. Just click on the "If the URL is valid..." link, and here you go, without any need to make up data for the subscription form!

    1. Re:Google is your friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Good tip. :-) There is of course also the version for super lazy geeks. :-)

    2. Re:Google is your friend! by ballpoint · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well well; this does away with the need for the PARTNER= NYT links.

      From now on I just need to remember to paste NYT URLs into the (Google) search box instead of the address box in Opera.

      Simple & Neat. Thanks !

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    3. Re:Google is your friend! by Aelfy · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but why does this work? It seems to load exactly the same link, from NYT and not Google's cache. Strange

    4. Re:Google is your friend! by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Referer header. If NYT thinks that you were referred by Google news, it lets you in, if it sees that you come from Slashdot, it doesn't (except with the PARTNER hack...).

      As Google news, and Google the search engine have the same Domain, NYT apparently does not (yet...) tell them apart.

    5. Re:Google is your friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work for me; NYT still wants me to register. Probably you already have one of their cookies.

    6. Re:Google is your friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could it be that you are using Internet Explorer? If so, reinstalling Windows might help (without first going to the non-referred link after re-installation).

    7. Re:Google is your friend! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      You might be blocking your referrer info. Some browsers can be set for this to let users preserve their privacy better.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:Google is your friend! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just published a method to circumvent copyright protection.
      Prepare yourself for a visit from the DMCA police.

    9. Re:Google is your friend! by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Prepare yourself for a visit from the DMCA police.

      I'm not overly worried here. I'm European, and fortunately we do have weapons of mass destructions (France's force de frappe), so I'm quite confident that coward Bush will not dare to set his feet here, hehe!

      (For those who don't know: one reason why Iraq was invaded was because they did not have any WMDs. On the other hand, countries that do have WMDs, such as North Korea, are safe!)

  5. Whoa by rfinnvik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oooh, the Total Perspective Vortex!

    *waits for Gargravarr to make an appearance*

    1. Re:Whoa by kevinbarsby · · Score: 1

      If that's the case shouldn't the readership of Slashdot be dramtically reduced, as those who view the Vortex have their Souls burnt away?

    2. Re:Whoa by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, except someone got a decimal point wrong. Slashdot readers still have their souls, but no lives.

      (-:

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  6. Hey you by Timesprout · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get out of my garden !!!

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Hey you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paint my fence!!!

    2. Re:Hey you by rmezzari · · Score: 0

      Unless you are a nude love-in...

      --
      "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds !"
  7. complete, sure by lemody · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard that next time they are going to release the last decimal of pi.

    --


    class he-man extends man!
    1. Re:complete, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I shouldn't say this publicly, since I signed an NDA, but rumour has it that the last two digits are 42.

    2. Re:complete, sure by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      I heard that next time they are going to release the last decimal of pi.

      But will they tell us whether there's an even or odd number of stars up there?

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    3. Re:complete, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Beat them to it!

      1.0

      (base pi)

    4. Re:complete, sure by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Funny
      I heard that next time they are going to release the last decimal of pi.

      Mmmmmmmmmm .... pie.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    5. Re:complete, sure by ahogue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obligatory Fox Trot reference.

    6. Re:complete, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, 42... but the real question is: "what is the question"... hmm hmm

    7. Re:complete, sure by ralmeida · · Score: 1

      The last digit is 1, on base 2.

      If it where 0, you could just take it off...

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
    8. Re:complete, sure by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, the last digit of pi either 5, 9 or 4.

      This can be proven, if somewhat bizarrely, by showing that since pi is the sum of an infinite number of rationals, and there are an infinite number of them that have decimals which repeat forever, that for a hypothetical digit position that is infinitely far away from the decimal point, each digit from 1 through 9 would occur infinitely many times. The sum of 1 through 9 is 45. Since each digit occurs the same number of times, the sum in this column must be 45 times some number which has a last digit of 5 or 0. Since this hypothetical infinityith digit is the last digit of pi, there is no carryover from following digits sums, so the last digit must either be 5 or 0. If it were 0, then you could drop this digit and perform the same task as before, but this time since you are adding an extra 4, the sum must either end in a 4 or a 9 for this digit.

      QED

    9. Re:complete, sure by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Here's all the digits of pi, in base pi:

      1

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    10. Re:complete, sure by noselasd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And since there is no last digit of pi, the whole thing is ofcourse useless to discuss.

    11. Re:complete, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm...what part of infinity don't you understand?

    12. Re:complete, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this universe the answer is most certainly odd.

    13. Re:complete, sure by flewp · · Score: 1

      Erm, it's 0. Pi is exactly 3.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    14. Re:complete, sure by Joe+Enduser · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are new around here, aren't you? You see, open source is all about choice. If I don't like the last digits of pi, I can simply fork the project and make it end the way I want!

    15. Re:complete, sure by Alsee · · Score: 1

      each digit from 1 through 9 would occur infinitely many times

      True.

      The sum of 1 through 9 is 45. Since each digit occurs the same number of times

      False. Just because each digit appears an infinite number of times does not mean that have an equal distribution.

      Look at the sum of N^2. The last digit is always 0,1,4,5,6, or 9. Each number appears an infinite number of times, but 1,4,6, and 9 each appear twice as often as 0 or 5. And even that distribution only works out exactly if you happen to stop counting after an exact multiple of 10. The ratio between 1's and 5's could easily be double PLUS ONE if you stop counting on on a 1,2,3, or 4 digit, and it would be double MINUS ONE if you stop counting on 5,6,7, or 8. It only comes out exactly double if you stop counting on a 9 or 0 digit.

      So there are two flaws. One, the distribution of digits from rationsals can be uneven, and even if it was even you still can't stop at some arbitray point to make it come out even.

      It's like saying the sum of all integers is even. It's only even if you stop at certain points, and odd if you stop at other points.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    16. Re:complete, sure by Alsee · · Score: 1

      the last decimal of pi.

      The last decimal of pi is . and it comes right after the three.

      Next question!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    17. Re:complete, sure by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

      "False. Just because each digit appears an infinite number of times does not mean that have an equal distribution."

      False. You're not wrapping your mind around the concept of infinite very well, which is understandable. If you repeat this pattern infinately:
      4444144441
      You would want to say that 4 occurs four times as often as 1, but this is not actually the case. In reality, both numbers are occurring infinately, which means they are occurring the same number of . . . oh no, I've gone cross-eyed.

      Well, there's five minutes of my life I'll never get back . . . ;-)

    18. Re:complete, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 4 still occurs 4 times more often than 1. Even though they occur infinitely many times the infinity of the 4's is larger than the infinity of the 1's.



    19. Re:complete, sure by aduzik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the last digit is 4. Pi is exactly 3.14, duh! Transcendental Shmancendental.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    20. Re:complete, sure by Alsee · · Score: 1

      See my reply later in this thread, it answers both you and an AC's post.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  8. Voyagers and Pioneer. by kiwioddBall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is interesting to see the Voyagers and Pioneer spacecraft on there. It is a fascinating subject for me, I believe that our technology will advance at sufficient speed that we will actually catch up with these craft with some future technology, and the issue will come up as to whether we bring them back to Earth as museum pieces or leave them on their course with special protection orders on them.

    Food for thought.

    And on an unrelated topic - Be careful - there is an acronymic something called WMAP lurking just on the far side of the moon, obviously hiding from earth.

    I'm sure it is waiting for the perfect moment to attack!

    1. Re:Voyagers and Pioneer. by TehHustler · · Score: 5, Informative

      WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) is sat in the L2 langrange point, beyond the Moon, monitoring all sorts of radiation type stuff. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF -8&q=wilkinson+microwave+anisotropy+probe&spel l=1

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    2. Re:Voyagers and Pioneer. by Igloodude · · Score: 2, Funny

      Special protection orders? Anyway, I'm sure some aliens will be happy to modify them and send them back to us, at which point the issue will come up as to whether the Creator is still around. Down, V'ger, that's a good boy.

      --
      We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
    3. Re:Voyagers and Pioneer. by fallingdown · · Score: 1

      Bring them back! Otherwise they'll become self aware and kill us all!

    4. Re:Voyagers and Pioneer. by icebones · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is interesting to see the Voyagers and Pioneer spacecraft on there. It is a fascinating subject for me, I believe that our technology will advance at sufficient speed that we will actually catch up with these craft with some future technology, and the issue will come up as to whether we bring them back to Earth as museum pieces or leave them on their course with special protection orders on them.

      it wouldn't matter, The Klingon's would still use it for target practice

      --
      Life is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
    5. Re:Voyagers and Pioneer. by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Neh, they've probably put them in orbit around pluto already to sell them as antiquities later on.

  9. Sloan Great Wall? by sakusha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is this bit on the map about the Sloan Great Wall? I googled around but only found a reference to the map itself. If this is the biggest cosmic structure ever discovered, news of it sure hasn't traveled very far outside the astronomer's circles. What is the Sloan Great Wall?

    1. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by TehHustler · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah, but is it visible from space!? (meh, sorry)

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    2. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by nv5 · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by Scarblac · · Score: 4, Informative

      I found this: http://www.newscienceparadigms.com/astro/great_wal l.htm. Googled for 'wall light years sloan' after a few other tries :-) Apparently an even bigger wall has been found, but I 'm no astronomer either :-)

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    4. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by Inominate · · Score: 3, Informative
    5. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've heard it's so big, you can see it from China.

    6. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by you_think_I'm_dumb! · · Score: 0

      The Sloan Great Wall is termed a large structure and shouldn't exist if you want to believe in the big bang. Oh? you didn't know? the balance of proof suggests the big bang is incorrect.

    7. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of this either, so thanks for asking. Only on slashdot can you ask a legitimate question and get called Flaimbait.

    8. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting article, why on Earth was the parent modded as Flamebait ? His was a perfectly reasonable question.

    10. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by wickedj · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the "Great Barrier" which leads to "Sha Ka Rhee"?

    11. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I just choked on some spring water I was drinking after I read that.

    12. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      you_think_I'm_dumb!

      Yes, but only because you keep saying stupid things.

    13. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by sakusha · · Score: 1

      ok thanks guys, I guess I should have googled for "sloan great wall" instead of sloan great wall, all I turned up was stuff about some guy named sloan visiting the Great Wall of China.
      Interesting that this structure is considered evidence against the Big Bang theory. I'm always rooting for the underdog so I am still holding on to the Steady State theory.

    14. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the largest wall of urinals known to mankind.

    15. Re:Sloan Great Wall? by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1
      It's actually track 6 on Sloan's 2001 release, Pretty Together.

      They're an awesome Canadian band. Check them out

  10. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no such thing as a good lie.

    There is, however, such a thing as a good model, as any true scientist will tell you. Obviously, the only perfect model of the universe is the universe itself; however, the derivation of useful models which are by design imperfect is absolutely at the heart of science.

  11. Paper Version by BigBlackDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    This map was published as a special pull-out in New Scientist, just before Christmas last year. Very cool.

    --
    /* This comment may not be thread-safe */
    1. Re:Paper Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this is the kind of centerfold scientists like?

  12. Urinals in Space! by boog3r · · Score: 2, Funny
    Following this announcement:
    (Reuters) Announcing their latest push toward monopolization of the intragalactic bathroom market, Sloan Valve Company announced today their "Sloan Great Wall" which will be able to flush billions upon billions of stars into their new "Sloan Black Hole."

    Investors showed their appreciation and stock prices backed all the way up to the fifth floor, when a plumber was called to alleviate the massive flooding.
    --
    signatures are for fools with hands
    1. Re:Urinals in Space! by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      which will be able to flush billions upon billions of stars into their new "Sloan Black Hole."

      Interestingly, you don't need a black hole to get rid of unwanted material. Due to the expansion of spacetime, simply rocket something away from you faster than the escape velocity of your local group of galaxies (perhaps 1000km/sec), and eventually it will vanish from your observable universe, or at least become redshifted to invisibility. (The flip side, is that alien civilizations near the edge of our observable universe may be rocketing their trash in our direction as we speak. And if it hits us, not only would it be a highly icky experience for us, we would be fundamentally unable to get back at them for it.)

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    2. Re:Urinals in Space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Due to the expansion of spacetime, simply rocket something away from you faster than the escape velocity of your local group of galaxies (perhaps 1000km/sec), and eventually it will vanish from your observable universe

      Not if it hits the moon and bounces back.

    3. Re:Urinals in Space! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interestingly
      I don't know about the rest of your statement but I can say unequivocally that you are dead wrong here

  13. But where's the fairy cake? by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Funny
    I thought looking at the whole of creation, as extrapolated from a piece of fairy cake, was supposed to screw with my mind or something. It doesn't appear to have done so, and I can't see any fairy cake either... I'm sooo disappointed!

    Pretty cool picture though; It'll look real nice alongside the Unix Family Tree on the wall. If only there was a landscape version... time for some PostScript hacking I guess.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:But where's the fairy cake? by Gamoid · · Score: 0

      Unless, of course, this is all a massive virtual universe with you at the center. Then you would be shown as the most important thing in the universe and stay sane.

      That's how Zaphod did it, anyway.

    2. Re:But where's the fairy cake? by cyrek · · Score: 1

      The Total Reality Vortex doesn't take the log to base ten of the Universe like this map does; It shows you your relative size to the unadulterated, unlogarithmified everything.

      IMHO, Showing someone their relative size to just the planet we live on would be enough to make most people's minds implode.

      --
      Insert witty sig about inserting witty sig here, here.
    3. Re:But where's the fairy cake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Unix family tree shows Linux as being derived from Minix 1.0! I wonder what Linus would say to that?

  14. Not to be found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Nope.

    Can't see SCO anywhere.

  15. Look closely... by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you zoom in on the SDSS galaxies at about 1 giga-parsec, it looks like one of them's broadcasting a message... looks like... "Can you hear me now?"... that can't be right.

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
  16. Hmm... I did not find by tsager · · Score: 5, Funny

    the restaurant at the end of the universe!
    So this map must be a fake!

    1. Re:Hmm... I did not find by msh210 · · Score: 1

      That was temporal 'end' temporally, not spatial, iIrc.

    2. Re:Hmm... I did not find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That restaurant was deliberately left out by SCO to latter prove that it's in fact their IP.

    3. Re:Hmm... I did not find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YRC

    4. Re:Hmm... I did not find by Imperator · · Score: 2, Informative

      The restaurant was at the end of the universe in time, not space. IIRC, it was a place where you could get a good meal while you watched the universe end--over and over again. So if it were to be on that map, it would have to be within our light horizon, which means the end of the universe would have already happened here. The good news: the restaurant might be out there beyond our vision. The bad news: we might see it one day. :)

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    5. Re:Hmm... I did not find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good news:
      Well you see arthur, the restaurant has this amazing bubble, it protects it from this stuff! I think.

    6. Re:Hmm... I did not find by aduzik · · Score: 1

      I thought the end of the universe was in Houston, Texas, where there's a Starbucks across the street from a Starbucks.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  17. Re:Harold Shipman, Dead at 57! by tsager · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On which map?

  18. the sun? by mandalayx · · Score: 1

    Looking at the map, you'll see that the sun is actually not that much farther from the Earth than Mars. I found that kind of interesting.

    Anyone up for some Icarian missions? Maybe we should suggest a Sun Base to our deer leader :)

    1. Re:the sun? by MadMoses · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Maybe we should suggest a Sun Base to our deer leader

      George is a deer leader? That explains some things.

      --

      Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    2. Re:the sun? by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 5, Informative

      Looking at the map, you'll see that the sun is actually not that much farther from the Earth than Mars


      It looks that way, but in fact the y-scale is logarithmic. Mars is at around 0.4AU away, whereas the Sun is (by definition) at 1.0AU. So really, the Sun is more than twice as far away.


      Plus, this map must be a snapshot in time, since it's quite possible for mars to be "on the other side" of the Sun, and thus further away from Earth than it, depending on the relative phase of the two planets' orbits.

      --
      These sigs are more interesting tha
    3. Re:the sun? by echucker · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a snapshot, because it includes various probes and Halley's comet at specific positions, and does not plot a path of movement for them.

    4. Re: the sun? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > > Looking at the map, you'll see that the sun is actually not that much farther from the Earth than Mars

      > It looks that way, but in fact the y-scale is logarithmic.

      So when we visit, can we get there quicker by taking the logarithmic route?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:the sun? by nmg196 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe we should suggest a Sun Base to our deer leader :)

      I've heard the people on the Sun have had problems with global warming and high levels of background radation. In their favour though, they do seem to have got nuclear fusion working, which we have so far failed to do here on Earth.

    6. Re:the sun? by fuctape · · Score: 1

      The x-axis indicates a 360 degree view -- I'm sure they plotted the *average* distances of the solar planetary bodies.

    7. Re:the sun? by missing000 · · Score: 1

      I've heard the people on the Sun have had problems with global warming and high levels of background radation. In their favour though, they do seem to have got nuclear fusion working, which we have so far failed to do here on Earth.

      Not to nitpick, but we seem to have had some success (dare I really call it that?) with the same type of fusion reaction observed on Sol. I believe they call it a "thermonuclear bomb"

      Our success at controlling this type of reaction is a different story of course.

    8. Re:the sun? by AntonyBartlett · · Score: 1
      Not to nitpick, but we seem to have had some success (dare I really call it that?) with the same type of fusion reaction observed on Sol. I believe they call it a "thermonuclear bomb"

      Well, since we're not nitpicking, I wont mention that (iirc) one's fusion and the other's fission.

    9. Re:the sun? by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Well I was kind of simplifying it...

      The Hiroshima bomb was a fission bomb (hydrogen bomb) - but that wasn't a very powerful bomb (RELATIVE to recent nuclear bombs). New nuclear bombs are fusion bombs (thermonuclear) but still have fission bombs in them as starters.

      What I was trying to say, is that nobody has successfully harnessed fusion (as occurs on the sun) as a significant source of power (except for political power!). They've only managed to harness it for creating weapons (which isn't really 'harnessing' it at all - it's just letting the reaction run haywire on purpose to create a big horrible mess in someone elses country).

      As you say though, I think they are making some progress and I think there are plans to build the worlds first fusion reactor in France.

    10. Re:the sun? by missing000 · · Score: 1
    11. Re: the sun? by 2short · · Score: 1


      Well, yes, you can get there considerably faster taking the logarithmic route. So if you can figure out how to have your craft accelerate constantly the whole way, a lot of stuff is not really that far away. Of course, if you're going a really long way, you'll get to going really fast, and constant acceleration will take more and more thrust. (Damn you, Relativity.)

    12. Re:the sun? by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

      Now can someone explain the horizontal axis?

    13. Re:the sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angle from center of Earth.

    14. Re:the sun? by AntonyBartlett · · Score: 1
      Oops. Glad we weren't nitpicking ;-)

      Perhaps I should hire myself out as a "Nuclear Bomb Making Expert" then. No... really - I figure I'd be doing the world a favour.

    15. Re:the sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the sun is ~93 million miles from earth, whereas Mars is ~300 million miles from earth. So yes, you're correct that it's closer than Mars.

    16. Re:the sun? by phazei · · Score: 1

      >Maybe we should suggest a Sun Base to our deer leader :)

      Perhaps you are insinuating he would look good on the wall with antlers?

    17. Re:the sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's quite possible for mars to be "on the other side" of the Sun, and thus further away from Earth than it, depending on the relative phase of the two planets' orbits.

      If you look at the map, you'll see an acltual example of this assumption holding true: Venus is shown to be further from the Earth than the Sun.

    18. Re:the sun? by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      George is a deer leader? That explains some things.

      Just a remote reference to kim jong il's livejournal :)

  19. China Seeking Royalty Claim! by graveyardduckx · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Chinese government is claiming to have property rights over all thing relating to "Great Walls" and are demanding the universe pay royalties for using this "Great Wall". In other news, the computer used to generate this map of the universe was running Linux so SCO is now claiming ownership over the entire universe. Permits to live in their universe may be purchased at any local SCO vendor for $699.

    1. Re:China Seeking Royalty Claim! by fatgeekuk · · Score: 1

      Not permits... time limited licenses with "no liability" clauses. They will issue the terms of the next license just as soon as they have finished placing their orders at magrathea.

      Ha, SCO, I slipped in the bath in YOUR universe, I want some moneee puleze.

  20. Re:Bad joke. by Tagren · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Proud owner of a Mensa membership card.


    Just so you know. 'Mensa' Without the 'a' in swedish means when a women has a period... :)
    And.. when you add the 'a', that is like saying that she 'has a period' right now. To have a period.

    ---
  21. comoving future visibility limit by wine · · Score: 5, Informative

    This weird comoving future visibility limit that is mentioned at the top of the map is explained in detail in the paper:

    [...] which shows how far a photon can travel in co-moving coordinates from the inflationary big bang to the infinite future.[...] This is the co-moving future visibility limit. No matter how long we wait, we will not be able to see further than this. This is surprisingly close.

    Yeah, that's only 19,027Mpc ;)

    1. Re:comoving future visibility limit by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've referred to it for many years as the "light cone" or "known space" (not as in Niven's Known Space). It's quite sobering that the universe, even that which we can mathematically predict (i.e., the result of the big bang) is so vast that there are areas that we will never interact with and, relativistially speaking, do not exist for us.

      (And yes, I am quite aware that it's silly to say "never" when it comes to anything like this, but you most often work with the most proven theories. There *may* be an anti gravitational force, for instance, but I'm not leaping off the Eiffel tower anytime soon).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  22. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Proud owner of a Mensa membership card.

    You should have returned it to its owner.

  23. hmmm... by jdifool · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    including such objects as the Sloan Great Wall

    'Told ya that the fucking chinese were everywhere..'

    jdif

    --
    Let's overcome our weakness.
  24. Not 1.3 Billion light years long by wsloand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The wall is actually 760 million light years wide... the comparison is that one light year is 1.3 billion times the length of the Great Wall of China. (Info is from here.)

    1. Re:Not 1.3 Billion light years long by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      That's a good analogy that made the whole thing easy to grasp :) But how many LOC's and VW Bugs is it?

    2. Re:Not 1.3 Billion light years long by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I'll need that figure in furlongs, leagues, and nautical miles, too. Thanks

    3. Re:Not 1.3 Billion light years long by 2short · · Score: 1

      3.57412789 x 10^22 furlongs
      1.29409676 x 10^21 leagues
      3.88229027 x 10^21 nautical miles

      Happy to help.

  25. Can anyone see Beagle 2 out there? by gwicks · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's got to be somewhere on the map!

    --
    All spelling mistakes are in my mind and are faithfully reproduced by my fingers
    1. Re:Can anyone see Beagle 2 out there? by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Yep, STILL stuck in Martian customs.

    2. Re:Can anyone see Beagle 2 out there? by BabyDave · · Score: 1

      Easy [points] - it's there ... and there ... and a few pieces are here ... a bit of it's over there as well.

  26. Anyone else feeling insignificant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone?

    Just me then.

    Oh well.

  27. This is too cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now that we have a map, how long before the kids start asking "Are we there yet?"

  28. Total Perspective Vortex by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

    Strange, I looked at that map and I had a feeling of, well, elation, joy, immense personal satisfaction, and an even higher feeling of self importance.

    1. Re:Total Perspective Vortex by caston · · Score: 1

      Quite the opposite. I left tiny in comparision and alone being so far away from even the closest star.

      --
      Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    2. Re:Total Perspective Vortex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The sun is within travelling distance.

    3. Re:Total Perspective Vortex by o'reor · · Score: 4, Funny
      The sun is within travelling distance.

      Confirmed. Last time I took a trip around the Sun, it took me about a year to do it. And for free ! Food and accomodation at your expense, though.

      Space tourism is much more affordable than some say.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    4. Re:Total Perspective Vortex by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Hey, is that really a piece of fairy cake? Man, if I told you how much I needed this, I wouldn't have time to eat it.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  29. good, but what about those surprise galaxies? by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Surprise Galaxies at the Edge of Observable Space do not fit here?

    If I'm right they would be somewhere above the Sloan Great Wall..

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  30. This is wrong! by Doomrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is clearly wrong. It doesn't look anything like the map in Frontier: Elite II.

    1. Re:This is wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I know. How am I ever supposed to get to Riedquat with this thing?

  31. Re:Bad joke. by Lijemo · · Score: 5, Funny

    All flat maps of the US are lies. I mean, don't these people realize that it's impossible to make an acurate flat representation of a curved surface? Rivers change course, mountains are growing and erodeing, and don't even get me started on changing town and county boundaries. Besides, some of these maps have less than 50 meter accuracy in the placement of roads. They are lying to their customers!

  32. Map of the universe.. hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    SCO won't be happy when they find out they're not at the center of it...

    1. Re:Map of the universe.. hmmm.... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


      They are. Check out how far down below the surface of the earth that map goes.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  33. Re:Bad joke. by wildsurf · · Score: 5, Interesting
    thus you can't create such a map.

    Brings to mind this passage from Lewis Carroll, 1897:

    "That's another thing we've learned from your Nation," said Mein Herr, "map-making. But we've carried it much further than you. What do you consider the largest map that would be really useful?"

    "About six inches to the mile."

    ""Only six inches!"exclaimed Mein Herr. "We very soon got to six yards to the mile. Then we tried a hundred yards to the mile. And then came the grandest idea of all! We actually made a map of the country, on the scale of a mile to the mile!"

    "Have you used it much?" I enquired.

    "It has never been spread out, yet," said Mein Herr: "the farmers objected: they said it would cover the whole country, and shut out the sunlight! So we now use the country itself, as its own map, and I assure you it does nearly as well.
    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  34. Reminds me of the "Great Chain of Being". by Daverz · · Score: 2, Funny

    But where's Hell and that old fart on his throne?

    http://www.stanford.edu/class/engl174b/chain.htm l

  35. Earth-centric map by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously the Spanish Inquisition got to them first. Incidentally, the link says the Catholic Church finally agreed the Earth wasn't at the centre of the solar system in 1983!

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Earth-centric map by Descartes · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I know you're kidding but it's an interesting thought. As far as we can observe (because we can only observe a certain distance out, etc.) the universe it perfectly spherical around us right? So why not have the earth as the center of the universe. Maybe they were wrong about the solar system, but I don't think it can be proven that the earth isn't the center of everything.

      Although, you could get technical and say that in order to have a center something must have a shape and that in order to have a shape the universe couldn't be infinite, which is of course impossible.

    2. Re:Earth-centric map by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Well, no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!

  36. Re:Bad joke. by !the!bad!fish! · · Score: 1
    Obviously, the only perfect model of the universe is the universe itself...

    You've seen the Matrix too often.

    --
    Kids today are tyrants. They contradict their parent, gobble their food, and tyrannize their teachers. - Socrates 400 BC
  37. I've noticed you troll/flame a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I took a look at your previous posts, and you've got about 50% troll or flamebait moderation. Which tends to tell me that many people here think you're an idiot...no matter what your Mensa card says.

    1. Re:I've noticed you troll/flame a lot by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...educated id 10 t? I looked into taking the Mensa test once. Then I realized that I really don't want to think that hard so I found the nearest comic book, grabbed a Pringle's can and a Mt. Dew and all of a sudden an incredible feeling of comfort rushed over me!

      "Report from the NEA: public school officials are elated! One administrator says: 'since we eliminated tests there is no more prayer in school!'. "

      --
      Have you hugged your penguin today?
    2. Re:I've noticed you troll/flame a lot by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I took the test, scored enough to be accepted but declined. I saw too many members with the same attitude as the Bad Joke poster and I don't like it.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  38. Re:Bad joke. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are you talking about?

    This is a GREAT model/map for teaching. the general population sit's ther eand simply drools when they see a log chart so this is obviousally not for general public consumption but for scientists and students to use to get a better grasp on spatial locations from earth center at that given point in time.

    pan this all you want, but I was able to teach my child some very important facts about our solar system with this chart. Her astronomical sciences teacher at her middle school was not able to explain a couple of the topics as clearly as this chart/map does.

    This is a great tool, if you are not able to understand it's usefulness that is your loss.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  39. Check out the "Zone of Avoidance"! by HawkinsD · · Score: 4, Informative
    I love the "zone of avoidance."

    Perhaps it's an area that smells bad?

    Oh, no, wait, it has to do with dust.

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    1. Re:Check out the "Zone of Avoidance"! by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      Farnsworth: All of zone's have name like that in the galaxy of terror.

      /futureama

      --

      -Bucky
  40. You are here (on Internet) by ZBigDid · · Score: 1

    http://perdu.com/ Did

  41. name of the preprint primary author :-) by Heraklit · · Score: 3, Funny


    did you notice the name of the primary author from the preprint on astro-ph/0310571?!

    J. Richard Gott III - and guess what "Gott" means in german?

    (same as english "god" of course! :-)

    1. Re:name of the preprint primary author :-) by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      And guess whose name starts with a J?

      Jesus, of course!

      So his name is Jesus Richard God III. Hey, Jesus Dick, how ya doin'

    2. Re:name of the preprint primary author :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on! Everybody knows that Jesus' middle name starts with 'H'!

      As in ... Jesus H. Christ!

    3. Re:name of the preprint primary author :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wrote a pretty cool book, too.

    4. Re:name of the preprint primary author :-) by burns210 · · Score: 1

      so J. Richard Gott III, his dad, and HIS dad would make the 3 gods? Like the holy trinity? Wow, i bet they have a very large ego in that family.

  42. Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a university server, you dolt.

  43. Center by Spire · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, so Earth really is at the center of the universe! I knew it!

    --
    begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
    1. Re:Center by gunnk · · Score: 1

      Actually, wherever you go, you are the center of your observable universe. So for Earth-dwellers, Earth really *is* the center of the (observable) universe.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
  44. No wonder Linux doesn't get any respect... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > Pretty cool picture though; It'll look real nice alongside the Unix Family Tree on the wall.

    Per the photo gallery at the bottom, Linus needs to grow a beard.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  45. Location and orbit of WMAP by Morgaine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LOL, that post made the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) sound like a secretive spy satellite. :-)

    Actually, WMAP is a hugely successful astronomical microwave observatory which sits at Earth's second Lagrange Point (L2). L2 is 1.5 million kilometers on the opposite side of the Earth from the Sun. This informative page shows the location and how the probe got there very clearly.

    The WMAP was launched in June of 2001 and has made a map of the temperature fluctuations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation with much higher resolution, sensitivity, and accuracy than its predecessor, COBE. It has been a huge success.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  46. Re:Bad joke. by condensate · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess the drawers of this map were well aware of all the problems you mention. It is however not their goal to produce an accurate reproduction of the universe, but rather an idea of how large a large scale can be. Then, it is a static plot, and no time involved here. Think of it as a snapshot. If you had read the article you would have noted that the authors gave a concise introduction of how their map was drawn. The map should show large scale structures and keep the shapes locally correct. Therefore, they have to use a (4D, of course) metric (the Friedmann metric) that does just this: It introduces so-called co-moving coordinates which keep objects at a constant position while the universe expands. Perhaps you should think about reading the article first and then complain. There is a reason for this model that they did. When you want to understand large scale structures, 4D stuff does not count, since how would you imagine this anyway, you want to have an impression of size as we see it, since we do not have another frame to see it from... There the map does a great job.

    --
    Black holes were created when god tried to divide by zero
  47. Mostly harmless by TTL0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    " Its view begins with the Earth at the bottom "

    "What? Harmless? Is that all it's got to say? Harmless! One word!"
    Ford shrugged.
    "Well, there are a hundred billion stars in the Galaxy, and only a limited amount of space in the book's microprocessors," he said, "and no one knew much about the Earth of course."
    "Well for God's sake I hope you managed to rectify that a bit."
    "Oh yes, well I managed to transmit a new entry off to the editor. He had to trim it a bit, but it's still an improvement."
    "And what does it say now?" asked Arthur.
    "Mostly harmless," admitted Ford with a slightly embarrassed cough.
    "Mostly harmless!" shouted Arthur.

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    1. Re:Mostly harmless by bedmison · · Score: 1

      It's the Total Perspective Vortex, a hedious device that reveals how insignificant you are by showing the entire infinity of the universe, and a little sign saying "You Are Here."

  48. Re:Bad joke. by ideonode · · Score: 4, Informative
    Others too have written about the (im)possibility of creating a map on a 1:1 scale.

    Borges did so in "Of Exactitude in Science" in A Universal History of Infamy":

    In that Empire, the craft of Cartography attained such Perfection that the Map of a Single province covered the space of an entire City, and the Map of the Empire itself an entire Province. In the course of Time, these Extensive maps were found somehow wanting, and so the College of Cartographers evolved a Map of the Empire that was of the same Scale as the Empire and that coincided with it point for point. Less attentive to the Study of Cartography, succeeding Generations came to judge a map of such Magnitude cumbersome, and, not without Irreverence, they abandoned it to the Rigours of sun and Rain. In the western Deserts, tattered Fragments of the Map are still to be found, Sheltering an occasional Beast or beggar; in the whole Nation, no other relic is left of the Discipline of Geography.


    Umberto Eco then took up the challenge in "On the Impossibility of Drawing a Map of the Empire on a Scale of 1 to 1" in How to Travel with a Salmon:
    When the map is installed over all the territory (whether suspended or not), the territory of the empire has the characteristic of being a territory entirely covered by a map. The map does not take into account this characteristic, which would have to be presented on another map that depicted the territory plus the lower map. But such a process would be infinite


    A nice summary of the three can be found here
  49. well well well by fabio · · Score: 0

    whaddaya know, here i thought that i were in a proll other starsystem, but then these jolly good fellas give me a map of the whole universe, how nice of them to make me able to pinpoint earths location for the great armada of zokchburhl

    *resistance is futile, or fuzzy, i dunno*

    --
    *resistance is futile, or fuzzy, i dunno*
  50. you lose fuddite protection when you stop lying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's what that o'neil guy must be wondering?

    disgruntled former employee sindrone? it's DOWtful.

  51. Another map by swinerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Perhaps less scientific, but it looks cooler: An Atlas of the Universe

    1. Re:Another map by dubstop · · Score: 1

      I'd never realised that Wolf 359 was so close.

  52. Re:Bad joke. by majuric · · Score: 2, Informative

    What we are plotting on the map is the universe in 'comoving coordinates', which are determined by cosmological parameters (amount of luminous matter, dark matter and dark energy in the universe). They're the ones that determine the global curvature of space, and in the past few years have been measured very accurately (eg., with WMAP).

    What you seem to be objecting to (among other things) is that the map should somehow depict local curvature as well (eg., you talk about closed timelike loops, black holes, etc). However, note that in that case you'd also have to object to every map of the _Earth_ that has ever been made, because it doesn't take into account the small increase in Earth's area due to mountains and depressions ("And their map would be f**ked around mountains for obvious reasons").

  53. Cool... Now how do I print it? :) by Dodgy+Chris · · Score: 1

    I'm so going to be spending the next few hours trying to print it out on the A0 printer.

    Any people who know what they are doing know how to rotate it? So its printed across the width of the printer (thus using the least paper possible).

    1. Re:Cool... Now how do I print it? :) by paul_n_miller · · Score: 1
      poster
      ./poster -v -mLet -pA0 all.ps > foo.ps
      Deciding for 3 columns and 6 rows of landscape pages.
      only the middle column has the image
      anyone have a better way to print this?
      --
      sig? what sig.
    2. Re:Cool... Now how do I print it? :) by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how to print it properly myself. I tried a simple "lpr all.ps", and got just one page of output, from the bottom up to about the Sun.

      The web site refers to printing each page and then joining them. What pages?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Cool... Now how do I print it? :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Find a Mac.

    4. Re:Cool... Now how do I print it? :) by Lijemo · · Score: 1

      The "individual sheets" section under the "Figures" heading halfway down the page. It has six seperate images to print seperately.

  54. Re:Bad joke. by Balthisar · · Score: 1

    Close to the same in English, "menses" from Month. English is my native Language, but I'm stupid and only know this from learning Spanish where the word is "mes" for month. Supposing I were female I'd know that I imagine.

    Oh, yeah, speaking of Spanish, "mensa" means dumb or silly. But FWIW "Bimbo" is a brand of bread. :)

    --
    --Jim (me)
  55. Traffic was terrible by OH-58aKiowa · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had to park out near Rigel and walk in. Who wants to bet my radio will still be there when I get back? Rigel's a tough neighborhood. I walked in to a bar and ordered a shot. Everybody ducked.

  56. Re:Bad joke. by fuzzybunny · · Score: 5, Funny

    All flat maps of the US are lies.

    You bet they are. I've spent hours looking for the gigantic 'M' that's supposed to be near the immense yellow dotted line crossing through my town.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  57. big hotspot/blemish on universe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's how they're looking at US now. this is what you wanted?

    the planet/population rescue mandate remains in crisis mode. the danger of overheating (peacing off?) the main processors remains real/is increasing. lookout bullow.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators... get ready to become a active member/stakeholder of the wwuniverse.

  58. Lost... by Rutje · · Score: 1

    Finally, I will not get lost anymore..
    Just remeber to bring a compass!!

    --

    I want my karma, and I want it now!
  59. Parsecs by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    In what facets of astronomy are parsecs the dominant unit of measurement?

  60. Re:WMAP by anubi · · Score: 2, Informative
    It is the Wilkinson Microwave Anisortopy Probe.

    Its in the LaGrange L2 point, opposite the earth from the sun.. ( so earth shields it from sunlight and solar interference, I suppose. ). Anyway, its mission is to map the picture of the Universe as seen by microwave radiation.

    Here's some links courtesy of Google...

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  61. Look! There! by whovian · · Score: 2, Funny

    I found Waldo hidden in the Great Wall!

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  62. Wait a minute....! by armando_wall · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert, but if sciencists think the universe is infinite, whatever map they draw will just be an infinitesimal portion of it!

    So, these maps should be called "Maps Of Our Neighborhood" instead, don't you think?

    1. Re:Wait a minute....! by pklong · · Score: 1

      They have produced a map of the visable universe. It is thought that if you travelled far enough you would end up back where you started as space is curved anyways.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    2. Re:Wait a minute....! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Whoever said scientists believe the universe is infinite? AFAIK this isn't as well accepted as you may think. I have *no idea* how it could *not* be infinite myself though.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. I , for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new Universal cartographers.

  65. I have a major complaint by Slick_Snake · · Score: 1

    First if it is to represent the entire universe there should be stars beyond the point of the Big Bang. An Explosion is space would disperse matter in a rough spherical manner, thus the Big Bang should be in the center not at the far end. Either we are not able to see the stars on the "other side" of the Big Bang or the Big Bang theory is not valid. I have faith that the Big Bang theory is mostly sound so WE must acknowledge that the map is very incomplete. It should be the map of the known universe.

    1. Re:I have a major complaint by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're forgetting that the farther away you search, the farther back in time you see. What you observe a foot away from your eyes is roughly one nanosecond old. The events we see on the sun really occurred about seven minutes ago. And, somewhere waaaaaay out there, is the origin of some (very old) remnants of the Big Bang, which are just now reaching us.

      There is the possibility that material from some other Big Crunch fed into what became our Big Bang, but its quantities and properties have nothing to do with our existence. For all intents and purposes, there is nothing "beyond" the Big Bang. And if there was, we are completely unable to observe it.

    2. Re:I have a major complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Not on a logarithmic map it wouldn't. The same distance at the other side of the center would be be
      twice as far, so on a logaritmic map it would extend a constant small distance beyond.


      However, you misunderstand the big bang. It's not like a great explosion throwing matter away from a center. It's spacetime ITSELF that expands, taking the contained matter with it. Think of a big rubber sheet with the galaxies attached to it. Now stretch the sheet. All galaxies move away from each other, but there is no center (fold the sheet into a sphere and slowly blow up the resulting balloon if that makes it easier to visualize the absence of a center for you).

    3. Re:I have a major complaint by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

      People keep forgetting that the "big bang" didn't happen in a place. IF it happened, it happened everywhere, hence the word "big", and the universe is infinite.

      Alternately, it might not have been BB, but a white hole, and the universe has a size, and time was very slow near the centre for a while due to gravitational effects.

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
    4. Re:I have a major complaint by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      What you and grandparent missed was that this map is actually a 360 degree map... Look at the bottom (x) scale...

      The map should really be viewed as extending outwards from you with 0 h being straight ahead, 6 h being to your right (for example), 12 h being behind you, and 18 h being to your left. The big bang at the top of the map isn't straight ahead of you, it's all around you, as far away (and as far back in time) as the map extends. We're on the inside of the shell, not the outside. That's why there's nothing on the 'other side' of the big bang.

      -T

    5. Re:I have a major complaint by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

      For light from the Big Bang to just now be reaching us, wouldn't that mean that the Earth and our solar system had to get here (from the point of the Big Bang) much faster than the speed of light? As far as I can imagine, light from the Big Bang passed us on the way here in the first instant after the event, right? Or, is it possible that we weren't part of the Big Bang, and therefore CAN see the light from the event?

    6. Re:I have a major complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. Space could have expanded faster than the speed of light near(time-wise) the big bang. Now, possibly, expansion of space is slowing down.

    7. Re:I have a major complaint by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

      So, say we did get here faster than light approximately 4 billion years ago. Humans had time to evolve and realize there was a universe out there and can now see about 15 billion light years away. This light from 15 billion ly away comes from near the time of the Big Bang. How many orders of magnitude faster than light would we have had to travel for this to be possible? Any easy way to crunch the numbers?

    8. Re:I have a major complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF it happened, it happened everywhere, hence the word "big", and the universe is infinite.

      I understand your point, but it might be more correct to say "IF it happened, it simply happened." Period. There was no "everywhere" for it to happen. "Everywhere" implies space, and possibly time, which there clearly was not. Then again me using the word "was" implies past and time also. So dammit!

  66. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  67. Re:In the spirit of the last story by panurge · · Score: 1

    Because it should be 4000 miles from the center, obviously. They're rocket scientists, they know these things.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  68. Re:Bad joke. by Ba3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you actually looked at the map, and rtfa, you would see that it is not a navigational map, but rather an attempt to juxtapose our insignficance in the observable universe, and our absolute significance in being the point of observation of the universe.

    "Objects close to us may be inconsequential in terms of the whole universe but they are important to us," (Dr. Gott, from the article)

    But then again, your stunning cognitive ability to discredit this 'map' without even understanding why it was done, should silence a mere layman like myself. Mensa would be proud.

  69. Re:Bad joke. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    there is no cheese spreader.

  70. Oort cloud this Spring Break! Book now and save... by vertigo_ok · · Score: 0

    Suddenly, I feel very small. The kind of feeling I got when I saw this:

    http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceo pt icsu/powersof10/index.html

    Its funny how one can be so tiny on one scale, then turn around and see a whole other universe right beneath them. We live in a very interesting place. Very groovy, baby.

    --
    haud servio tui deus neque tui diabolus huad servio tui regalis neque tu
  71. Space Exploration, Dubya style by 955301 · · Score: 1

    That must mean that the next two locations after Mars which the President would propose to send manned explorations to would be Mercury and the Sun...

    Who want's to bet?

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  72. How long until this data hits Celestia? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Right now Celestia by default only shows most of the stars in our arm of the Milky Way, plus two or three neighboring galaxies. Any reason why it couldn't be loaded up with the results of this survey at some point?

  73. Re:errrrggggg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary Rodham Clinton is the sexiest woman alive:

    I dunno, her daughter's not bad either

  74. Re:More importantly... by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

    ...whats the bit below it marked as CIA2 wall, godamnit!

  75. Re:Bad joke. by Kynde · · Score: 1

    Others too have written about the (im)possibility of creating a map on a 1:1 scale.

    Impossible? I don't think so.
    Gimme some petabytes of diskspace, a neat digicam with a good macro functionality and _some_ time and I'll ... oh feck it, how about fries and a coke?

    --
    1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
  76. Humanoid "juggler" figure in Great Wall map? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    I see a pattern that looks like a human figure dancing, perhaps juggling a beach ball on his or her left arm, in the lower portion of the image of the Sloan Great Wall?

    1. Re:Humanoid "juggler" figure in Great Wall map? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      yea i saw it too... here's looking at you, kid! :)

  77. Earth at the Center? by ocie · · Score: 1

    So the church was right all along!?!

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:Earth at the Center? by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      Earth has to be at the center... If you were on Mars and made a map, Mars would be the center, so on and so forth. The universe is so vast and in all directions, it only makes sense to have your location be the starting point for this type of map.

  78. That S.O.B. is down there somwhere... by DaleBob · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think I see my dad.

  79. Re:errrrggggg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like dogs, maybe....

  80. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would hate to have to fold a map like that...

  81. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All models are wrong-but some models are useful," distinguished statistician George P. E. Box.

    Box's profound contributions to statistics include fundamental work and classic references on the design of experiments and the forecasting and control of time series with so-called Box-Jenkins models.

  82. What's that near Pluto? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    It looks like "Guaoar", but the crappy font makes it hard to read. I've tried a few similar words and Google has given me squat.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:What's that near Pluto? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quaoar.

      Big space rock.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:What's that near Pluto? by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

      that would be Quaoar a recently found Kuiper Belt object.

      cheers!

    3. Re:What's that near Pluto? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Kwa-oo-aah-ohh-roar-arr-ahh-ohh-raaahh-oh-raahh-ah -raar-oo-uhhh-raa....

      ahh, fuck it. Whoever named the damn thing deserves to have his tongue cut out.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  83. Re:Bad joke. by firewrought · · Score: 1
    When the map is installed over all the territory (whether suspended or not), the territory of the empire has the characteristic of being a territory entirely covered by a map. The map does not take into account this characteristic, which would have to be presented on another map that depicted the territory plus the lower map. But such a process would be infinite.

    Nonsense... a good introspection system can take into account its own existance. For instance, Java and C# both get it right w/their reflection mechanisms. Professor Eco should know better.

    --
    -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  84. Re:Bad joke. by jeroen94704 · · Score: 1

    In the town where I live, "Mensa" is the name of the student union's restaurant. Every student can get a Mensa membership card and eat there for 3 bucks.

    So I don't know what all the fuss is about.


    --
    He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
  85. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    -- Dammit! I said Stop poking me in the eye!

    Well, put your mouth on it like I told you to.

  86. People of earth by PTDC · · Score: 1

    What are those large yellow things hanging in the sky in exactly the same way that bricks don't?

  87. Re:Bad joke. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
    and only know this from learning Spanish where the word is "mes" for month.

    And monthly = mensual.

  88. Okay! Where's the Nexus of Sominus? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Just need to know so that I don't accidentally aim any laser beams in that direction when trying to pull or push ducklike alien beings to or from Cleveland....err Earth.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  89. What is WMAP? by jonr · · Score: 1

    Just outside the Moon.

    1. Re:What is WMAP? by applemasker · · Score: 1

      It's the Wilkinson Microwave Anistrophy Probe (homepage - http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/) which =measures the cosmic microwave background radiation thought to be remnants of the Big Bang.

      --
      Bush Lies On the Record.
    2. Re:What is WMAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what Microsoft are pushing instead of AAC. Gives a whole new meaning to "Where do you want to go today" - to the dark side of the moon! (DRM crippled, of course...)

  90. Obvious(?) Alias Reference by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

    I was actually thinking that Arvin Sloan's (of the show Alias) master plan has finally been revealed. At long last!

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  91. It's funny, but... by gykh · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought when I saw that map was,

    "Eureka! Now I have a truly fitting wallpaper for my 21 workspace desktop....Excellent"

    (Said to the voices of Prof Fink, the Comic Book Guy and Monty Burns, in that order)

  92. How come Heaven's not listed? by jbarr · · Score: 1

    Just wondering...

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:How come Heaven's not listed? by telax · · Score: 1

      It's too far that we could see it. But when we find a solid firmament from the space, it's just behind that ;)

      --
      telax - Just another vim and c hacker.
  93. What I found odd... by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

    ...was that from the Heliopause to the Oort cloud, there's nothing. Why is that? Did they just not get around to mapping anything in that area, or is it really simply empty, lonely space?

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:What I found odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah it's from like 10 to the 6th to 10 to the 10th there is nothing, but all the other stars are pretty close to other stars, there aren't anymore that have four powers of seperation. Are we just that alone compared to the others or is the map not accurate?

    2. Re:What I found odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The distance from earth to stars on the map is something like 8*10^11 to 9*10^11, so the distance between these stars is on the order of 10^11 or at least 10^10. This is the same as the distance between 10^10 and 10^6. (if you subtract 10^6 from 10^10 you get pretty much 10^10 still). So the map is correct.

    3. Re:What I found odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn math stuff always screws up enjoying astronomy.

  94. Re:the Centauris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    You mean Londo and Vir?
    </b5ref>

  95. Parent Advisory: Lame portuguese PI joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Name an animal that has more than 3 eyes and less than 4?
    A: Piolho!

    Ok... ok...
    "Piolho" is Portuguese for "lice".
    "olho" is Portuguese for "eye".

    Pi + olho, get it? 3.14 eyes!
    Bhahahahahahahahahaha (sniff) I kill myself!

    ok, I'll go to my room now

  96. Distances in miles, in case anyone's interested. by Chas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The map is a representation of approximately 11.912216896 DUODECILLION MILES.

    That's 11,912,216,896,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 ,000 miles longhand.

    I wonder how many burgers White Castle would have to serve to make a stack that reaches THAT far....

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  97. Hmm by solidsmooky · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the map remind anyone of that old asteroids game?

  98. Mod this up funny! :-P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That I say.

  99. Enter, Beeblebrox... by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    Enter, Beeblebrox, enter the vortex!

    Okay, okay.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  100. not MS Streets&Trips by KaiBeezy · · Score: 1


    Italo Calvino's description of the mythical city of Eudoxia has long been one of my master narratives for any extensive, complex structure (Internet; universe; everything):
    ------------

    In Eudoxia, which spreads both upward and down, with winding alleys, steps, dead ends, hovels, a carpet is preserved in which you can observe the city's true form. At first sight nothing seems to resemble Eudoxia less than the design of that carpet, laid out in symmetrical motives whose patterns are repeated along straight and circular lines, interwoven with brilliantly colored spires, in a repetition that can be followed throughout the whole woof. But if you pause and examine it carefully, you become convinced that each place in the carpet corresponds to a place in the city and all the things contained in the city are included in the design, arranged according their true relationship, which escapes your eye distracted by the bustle, the throngs, the shoving. All of Eudoxia's confusion, the mules' braying, the lampblack stains, the fish smell is what is evident in the incomplete perspective you grasp; but the carpet proves that there is a point from which the city shows its true proportions, the geometrical scheme implicit in its every, tiniest detail.

    It is easy to get lost in Eudoxia: but when you concentrate and stare at the carpet, you recognize the street you were seeking in a crimson or indigo or magenta threat which, in a wide loop, brings you to the purple enclosure that is your real destination. Every inhabitant of Eudoxia compares the carpet's immobile order with his own image of the city, an anguish of his own, and each can find, concealed among the arabesques, an answer, the story of his life, the twists of fate.

    An oracle was questioned about the mysterious bond between two objects so dissimilar as the carpet and the city. One of the two objects -- the oracle replied -- has the form the gods gave the starry sky and the orbits in which the worlds revolve; the other is an approximate reflection, like every human creation.

    For some time the augurs had been sure that the carpet's harmonious pattern was of divine origin. The oracle was interpreted in this sense, arousing no controversy. But you could, similarly, come to the opposite conclusion: that the true map of the universe is the city of Eudoxia, just as it is, a stain that spreads out shapelessly, with crooked streets, houses that crumble one upon the other amid clouds of dust, fires, screams in the darkness.

    - from Invisible Cities

  101. Ah ha!!! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    So the Earth *IS* the center of the universe! :)

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  102. Alert! Script kiddies out there by r00zky · · Score: 1

    What are these "Trojans" just past the Asteroid Belt?
    Is the Earth going to be r00ted soon?

    --
    I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
  103. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post has become a "black hole", enveloped by a negative karma cloud so powerful that only clicking on the Parent link of one of the many debunking replies can penetrate it.

  104. Silly Scientists by BaronCarlos · · Score: 1

    I thought we beat this subject to death.

    The EARTH is NOT the Center of the Universe? Why do we keep drawing our maps that way?

    Copernicus and Gallileo are rolling in their graves right now.

    Next you will be telling me that the Earth is flat!

    *looks at the map again*
    Oh wait, you are!

    --
    *Carlos: Exit Stage Right*

    "Geeks, Where would you be without them?"
    "Got Linux?"

    1. Re:Silly Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we draw the maps that way because that's where we are. everything that we see is seen from earth, so it's distance from us is the most natural distance to use. plus, if they're going to use a time scale like that, earth has to be at the center, since that's the only way we know how things looked (since the light takes time to get to us, blah blah blah).

      next time you're hanging out in the oort cloud or whatever, you determine the distance to everything in the universe from there, and you go ahead and draw a map centered there and tell us all about it.

      or just be happy with what you're getting, cause it's pretty kickass as it is.

      good job princeton astronomers.

  105. And for the second page of the same article try by flyingace · · Score: 1

    And for the second page of the same article try this

    Click on "If the URL is valid..." to see actual article.

  106. Logarithmic axis is really cool... by trveler · · Score: 1

    This map reminds me of a film I saw on PBS once, and then again at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in D.C., called "Powers of Ten". Starts with an overhead camera shot of some people having a picnic. The camera starts to pull away, at the rate of another power-of-ten units each second. You see the earth, then the solar system, then the galaxy, then other galaxies, etc. Then the whole process is done backwards, right back down to the original shot of the picnic. Only this time, the camera zooms in further by powers of 10, into the skin on one of the people's hands, then into the cells, then the atoms, etc. It's really a must see.

    --
    ... is whot bwings os tugevza tsuzay.
  107. Galatic Center by dbooster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This may be off-topic, but it's something I have been wondering about that this story reminded me of. That is, have there been any more theories or discoveries as to what lies at the galatic center? The last theory I heard was one of hundreds of massive black holes, tho I never did understand how that would cause the massive sphere of light we always see at the galatic centers of other galaxies.

    Anyone want to share some light on this?

    Thanks!

    -db
    "What does god need with a starship?"

    1. Re:Galatic Center by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >what lies at the galatic center?

      A massive explosion that will sterilize Known Space in about 20,000 years. The Puppeteers have already fled.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Galatic Center by Hassman · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? The massive sphere of light we see at the center of other galaxies are millions and millions of stars...just like in our.

      When you look out and see "The Milky Way" you are looking toward the center of our galaxy where most of our stars are at. The fact that there are massive black holes at the center doesn't have anything to do with the light we see...why would it?

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  108. Re:Bad joke. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, you people haven't heard of the Flat Earth Society...

  109. You've got to be kidding right? by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 1

    ...extends back almost to the Big Bang at the top...

    I thought that at this point the Big Bang theory has actually been disproven without a shadow of doubt by many teams of blast physicists and astronomers all confirming each others work. Anyone have an upgrade of Scientist 4.8.32.1 lying around to send to thees guys? Their making wonderful art based on old / false info. It really surprises me that this falsehood is still acceptable in the respectable halls of Princeton... or did they just not get the memo?

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding right? by carn1fex · · Score: 1

      I think youre confused, the basic "big bang" theory stands and has been proven numerous ways. What happened in the seconds, hours, years after the big bang is what causes controversy.

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  110. Re:Bad joke. by wrax · · Score: 1

    Sure its not exactly as precise as some would want, but not everyone has 300 bucks to blow on a PDA.

  111. Re:Bad joke. by RobertFisher · · Score: 1

    I totally agree. I read about this poster several months ago when it first appeared as a preprint on the astro-ph preprint server. I loved it so much that I printed out the postscript version to put on the door of my office at work.

    Almost any technically-minded person who stops to look at it finds it very cool, and often has questions about it. The mark of its usefulness as a teaching tool is the fact that many cool astronomical facts can be picked up simply by carefully looking at it. For instance, there is an enormous gap in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey galaxies when plotted on this map. At first you may think it is simply an artifact, but actually it occcurs where we are trying to peer through the center of the galaxy -- the so-called "zone of avoidance". It shows up on the plot because the data are plotted in galactic coordinates. The plot is rich in such detail. A few more are mentioned in the astro-ph paper; truly curious and interested folks would benefit from reading it.

    Bob

    --
    Science, like Nature, must also be tamed, with a view turned towards its preservation.
  112. Total Perspective Vortex - HGTTG by alexborges · · Score: 1

    ..."Zaphod heard a distant terrible cry of pain 'What was that?' he asked. 'Its a recording, we play it for every next victim of the vortex'...

    --
    NO SIG
  113. They have slashdotting graphs too... by EqualSlash · · Score: 1


    http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjuric/universe/ sl ashdotting/

  114. Slashdotting Data by rogue555 · · Score: 0

    The wonderful folks at Princeton are keeping track of our activities. Check out the effect of slashdotting on their traffic here.

    --
    "That's not ironic, it's just mean!" - Bender
  115. Won't someone help the MST crew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that we know where the Mystery Science Theater ship is can't we help Gypsy, Tom Servo and the gang get back?

  116. star wars by theMerovingian · · Score: 1

    In the most recent star wars movie, ObiWan and Yoda are looking at a big 3d map of the star system. Obi refers to a small planet to the north of something. Being a map maker for a living, I was somewhat incensed - cardinal directions aren't really applicable in space.

    For a cool website on interstellar mapping, check here.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:star wars by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      I assume Obi is referring to a galactic system of coordinates where "Galactic North" and "Galactic South" are in the corresponding directions of their galaxy's axis.

  117. Weird by Eccles · · Score: 1

    They have Venus displayed as being farther away than Mars and Mercury. Granted, at specific points in time that may be true, but it might have made more sense to do average distance or even show a line for the variation in distance for Mars, Venus, and Mercury. Everything farther away has much less variance as a percentage of distance.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  118. Gallileo was wrong by dpgilliland · · Score: 2, Funny

    So Gallileo was wrong. The universe does revolve around the earth ;)

  119. Map of the "universe" by patricksevenlee · · Score: 1

    For most people here, this one is good enough :) http://www.stdimension.de/Cartography/Source/map_v oyroute.jpg

  120. big M (Re:Bad joke.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is by Platteville, Wisconsin. The students at the university go and paint it to keep it reasonably white.

    1. Re:big M (Re:Bad joke.) by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      Hmm, yes. I walk there when I get bored sometimes. You can even touch it! Sure enough, there's a big, white, rocky "M" there.

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
  121. Check out the data points on *that* cluster! by MasonMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obligatory reference to centerfolds and geeks.

    Carry on.

  122. Re:Distances in miles, in case anyone's interested by wgnorm · · Score: 1

    So what's at

    11,912,216,896,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0 00 ,001 miles?

  123. Re:Bad joke. by clintp · · Score: 1
    "It has never been spread out, yet," said Mein Herr: "the farmers objected: they said it would cover the whole country, and shut out the sunlight! So we now use the country itself, as its own map, and I assure you it does nearly as well.

    I assure you: the problem isn't unfurling a map of that size, the problem is folding it back up again correctly.
    --
    Get off my lawn.
  124. You never hard of the millenium falcon??? by Thrymm · · Score: 1

    Its the ship that made the Kessel Run in less than 5 Parsecs

  125. Re:Bad joke. by Aapje · · Score: 1

    Others too have written about the (im)possibility of creating a map on a 1:1 scale.

    Borges did so in "Of Exactitude in Science" in A Universal History of Infamy":

    In that Empire, the craft of Cartography attained such Perfection that the Map of a Single province covered the space of an entire City, and the Map of the Empire itself an entire Province. In the course of Time, these Extensive maps were found somehow wanting, and so the College of Cartographers evolved a Map of the Empire that was of the same Scale as the Empire and that coincided with it point for point. Less attentive to the Study of Cartography, succeeding Generations came to judge a map of such Magnitude cumbersome, and, not without Irreverence, they abandoned it to the Rigours of sun and Rain. In the western Deserts, tattered Fragments of the Map are still to be found, Sheltering an occasional Beast or beggar; in the whole Nation, no other relic is left of the Discipline of Geography.


    Interestingly, the problem Borges identified has disappeared because we have computers. We no longer have to create an immense, cumbersome map, instead we can store the map on a small harddisk. Furthermore, the monitor allows us to display any piece of the map without having to unfold an immense document. Finally, the computer can easily scale the document so that we can convert the map to a useful scale.

    Umberto Eco then took up the challenge in "On the Impossibility of Drawing a Map of the Empire on a Scale of 1 to 1" in How to Travel with a Salmon:

    When the map is installed over all the territory (whether suspended or not), the territory of the empire has the characteristic of being a territory entirely covered by a map. The map does not take into account this characteristic, which would have to be presented on another map that depicted the territory plus the lower map. But such a process would be infinite.


    This is mostly a thought experiment and less valuable in the real world. The problem of creating the map and keeping it up to date will be the obstacle long before the infinite recursion will be a problem (which you can just avoid by not expanding the entire map). Still, it is a nice example of real-world infinite recursion. The best example that I know is a visual effect that the Droste company used for their boxes of cocoa. The nurse carries a plate with a box of cocoa which shows a nurse carrying a plate with a box of cocoa which shows... Simple, but a very good introduction to infinite recursion.

    --

    The Drowned and the Saved - Primo Levi
  126. Center of the Universe by captnjameskirk · · Score: 1

    I loaded the .gif and used Photoshop to find the exact center. No matter how hard I tried, I couldn't find SCO. :)

  127. Reading the article without registration by Marco+Krohn · · Score: 1

    Copy the link, go to google and search for the link. Yes, right, search for it you won't get a result, BUT google will tell you "If the URL is valid, try visiting that web page by clicking on the following link" and if you click that link you have access to that article.

    ----
    thanks to a slashdotter who found out that having the right referrer solves the registration problem :-) my addition was just to not use the browser itself to modify the referrer, but use good old google for that.

  128. aww... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing sadder than a neglected third-rate troll. It's somehow touching to find one every now and then. Maybe with some more practice you'll get a few bites someday.

  129. Well It's nice.... by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 1


    But we all know what question needs to be answered...

    How many VW Beetles is it to the Sloan Great Wall?

    --
    Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
  130. What is the x-axis? by one-of-many · · Score: 1

    What are the 6h, 12h, ... units?
    They look like 60 of 360 degrees, but if the earth spins, how do you draw the zero radial?

    1. Re:What is the x-axis? by gjbivin · · Score: 1

      "Right Asension", which is similar to longitude. For astronomer's ease-of-use, they divided the sky sphere up into 24 hours in this direction, so it is easy to determine when a given position rotates into view. The equivalent of latitude is "Declination", which is measured in degrees the same way as latitude is. R.A. and Dec. are relative to the sky, so a fixed star is always at the same R.A. and Dec. no matter how the Earth is turned (ignoring precession of the Earth's axis, which complicates things over the years) 0 hours R.A. is the Vernal Equinox.

  131. 45 billion years? by suitti · · Score: 1
    Accordingly, those Big Bang embers are now some 45 billion years out.

    As the Universe is considered to be 13.7 +/- 0.2 billion years old, and things move at light speed at maximum, how is anything over 27.4 billion years from anything?

    --
    -- Stephen.
    1. Re:45 billion years? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Maybe because the universe has, in the meantime, expanded ~ effectively accelerating the speed at which objects move away from each other? Only guessing.

  132. Not exactly (Re:Center) by hacksoncode · · Score: 1

    If you look carefully at the map, the Earth is at the *bottom* of the Universe.

  133. Not at E-M L2, it's at E-S L2 by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe) is sat in the L2 langrange point, beyond the Moon,

    Not technically correct...

    The map shows it right on the other side of the moon, but that's misleading - it depends on when the 'picture' was taken. On that date, the moon and WMAP lined up.

    However, WMAP is at the Earth-Sun L2 point, not the Earth-Moon L2 point.
    If it were at Earth-Moon L2, we could never communicate with it, except through a relay satellite elsewhere. Instead, it's at the Earth-Sun L2, in permanent 'shadow', which is perfect for its purpose of observing the background radiation.

    -T

  134. What is Right Ascension (the x-axis)? by one-of-many · · Score: 1

    Most definitions out there were horrible. Here's my take.

    Right Ascension - the angle to the east, measured in hours and minutes, between an object in the sky and the Vernal Equinox (the point in the earth's equatorial plane where the sun passes from south to north) in the celestial equator (the circle in the same plane as the earth's equator and with the earth as it's center).

    I am not sure if the 0 hr line includes the earth at all times or at the time of the Vernal Equinox. Or if anyone bothers to make the distinction when most things are so far away.

    http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/right+ as cension

  135. New Scientist by NekoXP · · Score: 1

    .. gave this chart away in an issue a few weeks back. It looks MUCH nicer in colour ;)

  136. Re:Bad joke. by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Have you checked at McDonalds?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  137. Something I've always wondered by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    How, exactly, do they generate 'pictures' of the milky way galaxy?

  138. Re:Distances in miles, in case anyone's interested by tntguy · · Score: 1

    You could decrease the number drastically by measuring the trail left by the expulsion of consumed burgers.

    According to my calculations, you'd only need three.

  139. Re: Last digit of pi [Was: complete, sure] by dbMudd · · Score: 1

    Actually, the last digit of pi either 5, 9 or 4.

    This can be proven, if somewhat bizarrely, by showing that since pi is the sum of an infinite number of rationals, and there are an infinite number of them that have decimals which repeat forever, that for a hypothetical digit position that is infinitely far away from the decimal point, each digit from 1 through 9 would occur infinitely many times. The sum of 1 through 9 is 45. Since each digit occurs the same number of times, the sum in this column must be 45 times some number which has a last digit of 5 or 0. Since this hypothetical infinityith digit is the last digit of pi, there is no carryover from following digits sums, so the last digit must either be 5 or 0. If it were 0, then you could drop this digit and perform the same task as before, but this time since you are adding an extra 4, the sum must either end in a 4 or a 9 for this digit.

    QED


    Two big problems (in addition to the fundamental issue that since pi is irrational it can have no 'last' digit):

    First, just because each digit occurs infinitely often doesn't imply that each occurs equally often. For a simple example, it's trivial to write an inifinite series of digits that contains each digit an infinite number of times and never sums to a multiple of 45: 1 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 0123456789 ...

    Second, you later state that the final non-zero digit of any multiple of 45 must be a 4, 5, or 9, but this is also false: 180, for example. In fact, the last non-zero can be any digit (except for zero, of course): i.e. 90, 180, 270, ...

    In the future, sir, please remember that you are allowed only one completely outrageous statement per post, and comport yourself accordingly.
  140. Question by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    How can the Milky Way center not be... in the center? It's so close to the Milky Way Disk! Is it a matter of perspective?

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
    1. Re:Question by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      We are on the edge, roughly, of the Milky way. That means the furthest part of the edge is twice as far as the center.

      Take a look: the center is at a little less than 9 kpc (kiloparsecs) and the bulge of the disk edge is at about 20 kpc. Seems OK to me.

      The vertical scale is logarithmic.

  141. frontier: elite comes to mind by ardor · · Score: 1

    i am still amazed by the starmap of this game. the scales are immense, yet this game, fitting in 1mb, spans an entiry GALAXY. of course, i know, the planets are generated and not stored etc. etc. yaddayadda. nevertheless it's impressive. the main developer, david braben, stated years ago that the planets move according to newtonian physics, and that most of the stars near earth are real & at their correct place. now I wonder: does something like a elite-style starmap exist? i mean, in 3d, with the galaxy forming a plane and the stars being points on this plane, each star with a specific distance from the plane.

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
  142. Map of the Universe by elronxenu · · Score: 1

    There's an even better map of the universe here, at http://www.anzwers.org/free/universe/index.html

  143. WTF??? by mark-t · · Score: 1
    Okay... who modded this up as "Interesting?"

    I was just bullshitting, people... geeze. :)

    Ah... that must be it. I forgot the smiley.

  144. Great map but.. by Uplore · · Score: 0

    can anyone see the Beagle?

    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
  145. You got the quote wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's

    "Carter, I can see my house!"

  146. Re:Bad joe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a GREAT model/map for teaching. the general population sit's ther eand simply drools when they see a log chart so this is obviousally not for general public consumption but for scientists and students to use to get a better grasp on spatial locations from earth center at that given point in time.

    Whereas those of us in the know use apostrophes for plurals and fail to capitalize the first letter of each sentence.

    This is a great tool, if you are not able to understand it's usefulness that is your loss.

    Oh yeah, and we also don't know the difference between "it's" and "its."

  147. 2 Questions by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    This map shows that the universe is both accelerating and decelerating at the same time? How is this possible? (Last I heard, the universe was expanding, and the rate of expansion was accelerating.)

    What is this Great Wall?

  148. Open up the bag... by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    I was just bullshitting, people... geeze. :)

    Announcer: Well, Mrs. Prezky, open up the bag and see what you've won.
    Mrs. Prezky: [stupified] Uh... why, this is a bag of shit!
    Announcer: That's right, Mrs. Prezky. But it's really great shit!
    --The Firesign Theater

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  149. Whew! by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

    For a minute there I thought it was NMAP.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  150. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, are wrong, wrong, wrong. These are the same infinity. I can tell you how to pair up the 1's and the 4's such that every 1 is paired up with a unique 4, and every 4 is paired up with a unique 1. There are the same number of each.

    For example: give each position an index number, starting from one. Pair the 1 at position one with the 4 at position five. Pair the 1 at position two with the 4 at position ten. Pair the 1 at position six with the 4 at position twenty-five. This pairs every 4 with a unique 1, and every 1 with a unique 4. Hence, there are the same number of 1's and 4's.

    1. Re:WRONG by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I can tell you how to pair up the 1's and the 4's such that every 1 is paired up with a unique 4, and every 4 is paired up with a unique 1.

      Yes, but the parent poster was still right. There are four times as many 4's and 1's, and both of them equal infinity.

      The original problem was an attempt to match up the infinite number of each digit in PI into groups suming "45". The problem is that is there are four 4's for each 1 then you need to run farther and farther ahead in the string of digits in order to find a 1 to match up with the current 4. You then wind up with an infinitely long stretch of the string where you've already yanked out all of the 1's but you haven't processed the 4's yet. This smashes the attempt to properly process the string in clusters making "45". For every 1 you've processed you've run past three unmatched 4's.

      You've still got the problem that the last digit is jumping wildly over every possible value during each of the ten steps of the 0-9 cluster. By merely shifting the position of your ten digit cluster window you can "prove" the last digit must be anything you want it to be.

      Just because you could arrange to only "look" when the last digit is 5 doesn't mean the last digit really is 5. You could just as well arrange to only look when the last digit is 3.

      Proof that the last digit of the sum of the digits of pi is 3:

      After the decimal point there are an infinite number of each digit. Match up two 0's, two 1's, two 2's, two 3's, two 4's, two 5's, two 6's, two 7's, two 8's, and two 9's. The sum is 90, the last digit is zero so they never affect the last digit of the sum. Since we have the 3 before the decimal point then that last digit is always 3.

      If course if we had included the 3 before the decimal point in the matching process then we would have "proven" the last digit of the sum must be zero.

      If we had grouped one of each digit rather than pairs of each digit then we'd be adding 45 each time. The "3" proof above would then "prove" that the last digit must be 3 or 8, and the "0" proof above would "prove" that the last digit was 0 or 5.

      You can manipulate the "proof" to get any result.

      The only time that sort of method works is if each step you are getting closer and closer to a limit result, such as 0.99999 repeating. The further down the list you go the smaller and smaller the maximum distance from 1.0. With something like looking for the "last digit", that "last digit" changes wildly with every new digit you add. It is not approaching a final value, it is just infinitely flickering over every possible value.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  151. Snarky BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just establishment puffery. If they'd look at actual observations they'd reach different conclusions. See Arp.

  152. FWIW: Table by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    Mensa is supposed to be from the Latin word for table. Something to do with it being a round table sort of organization where everyone is treated equally.

    (Buncha frickin geniuses. Yeesh!)

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  153. But... by KennyP · · Score: 0

    Where are the fire exits?

  154. Re:Bad joke. by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

    A map like this might do the trick. Implementation details are left as an exercise to the reader.

    --
    "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)