Slashdot Mirror


Matrix-Style Brain Interface Closer To Reality

atkulp writes "According to this Wired article, a private company, Cyberkinetics is seeking permission from the FDA to test a product called BrainGate that implants in the brain and can control actions on a computer. So far it works for monkeys and they'd like to see it as viable for quadriplegics and others in need. How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card? Sign me up!"

98 of 567 comments (clear)

  1. screw the matrix by proj_2501 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can get a remote-controlled monkey?!

    1. Re:screw the matrix by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a beawulf cluster of US.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:screw the matrix by nih · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    3. Re:screw the matrix by Codeboi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Flash! PETA activist beaten to death by R/C Monkey. News at 11!

    4. Re:screw the matrix by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Funny

      What would you do with a robot on your lap? Never mind. I don't think I'd want to know....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    5. Re:screw the matrix by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      My God, I think you may have just made his point for him Mister AC. Good on you!

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    6. Re:screw the matrix by danila · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about monkey's, but you can find some videos of remote-controlled rats on the net. Google for remote controlled rats video. Some news site have short clips of rats going through the "obstacle course". :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Yes, but .. by Autonomous+Cowherder · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. will I be able to run Linux?

    1. Re:Yes, but .. by SamiousHaze · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe, but you'd be fucked if you botched installing a new kernel.

    2. Re:Yes, but .. by diersing · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, Linux RUNS you!!, or something

    3. Re:Yes, but .. by NeoThermic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or a direct link to your brain got posted on slashdot...

      NeoThermic

      --
      Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    4. Re:Yes, but .. by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > humans are already watercooled!

      D'oh, of course you are right :)

      > I guess liquid nitrogen would work

      That would give a whole new level of meaning to the phrase "Brain freeze."

  4. Not exactly the Matrix by Orion442 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This would enable handicap people to control machines, not vice-versa. It would be killer for fighter pilots though...

    1. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
      It would be killer for fighter pilots though

      I thought so too, until I realised that the human brain has a tendency to wander. Sure, in the middle of aerial combat they'd be focused, but can you imagine what would happen in the case that some pilot is cruising along and thinks of his girlfriend back home? Yeah that's right... a very sharp climb into a stall.

      --
      IAALS.
    2. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I think the plane would dump all of it's fuel. ;)

    3. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, the Matrix is fictional.

    4. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by whittrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      human assisted neuro devices

      The government is working on something similar.

    5. Re:Not exactly the Matrix by grgyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Fox 2, why is your refueling boom extended? Fox 2, do you receive?"

      --
      ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  5. Nice, they've got Matlab routines... by tcopeland · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...for processing the data from the microelectrode arrays.

    Yes, the above link goes to another web site called "bionictech.com", but the two companies merged in 2002.

    1. Re:Nice, they've got Matlab routines... by blakestah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep. John Donoghue (of Brown) has been working on this stuff for a few years, and his former postdoc, implant engineer Nikos Hatsopoulos is another key person at Cyberkinetics. But this is really Donoghue's baby.

      They've adopted the Richard Normann's (of Bionic Tech) implants (the Utah grid), and they are working fairly well for time periods up to a year. You can expect them to be the first to do human studies, and for quite a lot to be learned about the brain in the process, as well as dramatic improvements in the lives of their test patients.

      I'm quite excited to see how it goes for them, and hope for the best.

  6. Wow... by Undaar · · Score: 4, Funny

    So far it works for monkeys...

    Can they use it to teach the monkeys to program?
    That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!
    *ducks*

    --
    ~ "When I'm of that age I'm just going to live up a tree."
    1. Re:Wow... by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny
      That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!

      One time I hired a code monkey to write code for me at work. I would just sit there with my mind a complete blank while the monkey typed on a little keyboard. At the end of the project my boss said "Team, I want you to give a presentation on your code." So I made some PowerPoint slides that said "Hello, my name is Bingo. I like to climb on things. Can I have a banana? Eek eek." I got fired and my job was transferred to India. When I told my wife about it she said, "I told you, never trust a monkey!" The end.

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    2. Re:Wow... by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hate to break it to you, but all your competition in the job market consists of primates.

      We're talking monkeys working for other talking monkeys, making things that will convince yet other talking monkeys (who could be anywhere on the planet of the talking monkeys) to part with their monkey money in exchange for whatever you are making. Really, your whole life is all about whatever pleases a talking monkey.

      It boggles the monkey mind.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    3. Re:Wow... by cygnus · · Score: 2, Funny
      Can they use it to teach the monkeys to program?
      That would make them the ultimate code monkeys!
      *ducks*
      that's just not right.

      code monkeys have to be *monkeys*, not ducks!

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
  7. Ugh... by ManicGiraffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    So....imagine a Beowulf cluster of *me*!

    [rimshot...]

    1. Re:Ugh... by dasheiff · · Score: 2, Funny

      So....imagine a Beowulf cluster of ...us...

      Restance is Futile.

  8. sign me up by rogabean · · Score: 3, Interesting

    sign me up as well! i have wondered though when they seriously would start implementing computer based implants in our brains. it actually seems quite logical as a "next step" sorta thing. i remember when me and friends used to joke that one day we'd be able to add extra memory (RAM) to our brains. watch this have DRM on it! (lol)

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    1. Re:sign me up by JediDan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately believable... The company pays for a brain upgrade that's enabled/disabled at the door and it makes for a more efficient and capable worker. Wrong or right?

      --
      - Dan
  9. Hackers... by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They better make it pretty secure. It would really suck to have someone hack your brain, especially since backing up your brain is a bit difficult right now.

    --
    Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    1. Re:Hackers... by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not the backup that causes the problem, it's the restore.

  10. No M$ for mine... by BitWarrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm game as long as it's not controlled by Windows. I can see it now, it's the ultimate experience in VR except for the minor annoyance of crashing and killing the connected users after a few days.

    1. Re:No M$ for mine... by SpyderPSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm game as long as it's not controlled by Windows. I can see it now, it's the ultimate experience in VR except for the minor annoyance of crashing and killing the connected users after a few days.

      You think it would take that long? ; )

  11. Not like The Matrix at all by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This really isn't Matrix-like at all, though. The implant doesn't feed information to your brain, it only gets information from it. Still, it's VERY cool if it works and is safe. I like the idea they mention of also putting implants into paralyzed limbs to allow the brain implant to move them. Eat it, paralyzation!

    -W
    --

    --
    All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
    1. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by SpyPlane · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it can get information from my brain, can I finally prove to my wife that I have no f-ing clue what she is talking about most of the time, or that I REALLY don't care where we go eat friday!

      Let me know.

      --
      "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
    2. Re:Not like The Matrix at all by 6.023e23 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      True, this application is for reading data, not writing data, but can the other be far behind? (Well, yes it can, but the idea is there.)

      I'm somewhat disturbed that some people's first thought is how this could be used in the military. While there's no doubt that the DoD will be first on the list to play with such toys (that is if they're arent' already in some hidden lab), I'd prefer the focus to be on the medical and scientific uses, especially dealing the quad- and paraplegics, ALS, Parkinson's, etc. I can also think of many applications that, while similar in nature to how a fighter pilot would use it, would be non-military.

      This is still EXTREMELY rudimentary and we have a very long way to go before such input/output can be done on a truly reliable basis with what would be considered a true neuro-computer interface. This is a good step though.

  12. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by thelaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "what happens if i die in the matrix?"

    "the body cannot live without the mind."

    jon the "morpheust"

    --
    -- http://www.cerastes.org
  13. Regretting... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    How soon until anyone can become the ultimate expansion card? Sign me up!"

    Damned ISA interface! I was told when it was welded on that it was all I would need. That and 640K!

  14. I want my math coprocessor by ITR81 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Doesn't everyone need this??

    Don't forget ram doubler. I would love to store memories.

    1. Re:I want my math coprocessor by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Won't work.

      the Digital restrictions management will not allow you to remember anything you see or hear.

  15. We are the Borg by NetDanzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So let's see. First, we connect our brains to the computer. Then we create Internet 3, by directly linking our brains. Then a new anti-terrorism bill outlaws firewalls, and our brains will be wide open to each other. Can anybody say "collective consciousness"?

    1. Re:We are the Borg by shuz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      www.theafternow.com this radio drama does this! Its pertty good! 17 hours long total.

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    2. Re:We are the Borg by canfirman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Reminds me of an episode of "The Outer Limits" called "Stream of Consciousness". It dealt with people in society hooked up to a super-computer to look up any information ever stored in the world as well as non-verbal communication. Unfortunately, it meant the loss of the ability to read, as books became redundant. However, the computer went haywire, making people do strange things (like counting the grains of sand on the beach - becuase it wanted to know), resulting in people's death. The only way to survive was to get "unplugged".

      I don't watch "The Outer Limits" on a regular basis, but I caught this one. Very interesting.

      --
      It is not our abilities that show what we truly are... it is our choices.
    3. Re:We are the Borg by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

      I feel a song coming on....

      We are the Borg,
      We are the children
      We are the ones who assimilate
      So quit resistin'

      It's a choice we're makin,
      Connecting our own brains,
      But it's true we'll make a bigger hive
      Just you and me!

  16. Link to article explaining the monkey mind control by shuz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I could make a long comment about it but everyone will just go to the link anyways. here ya go!
    http://www.health24.co.za/news/Brain_Neurolog ical/ 1-896,25078.asp

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  17. real or virtual viruses to make the leap first? by keot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is scary, although at least at the moment when you're plugged in you are able to communicate with the machine and the real world, unlike the matrix, where you are either fully in or fully out.

    think what would happen if a virus made a leap from our reality to the machine reality; or the other way round...

  18. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Soul+Brother+#1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder if this would work backwards? Is this the gateway to using the human brain as a computer? (After all, we only use a portion of it...)

    No, we don't.

    http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percnt.htm

    -W
    --

    --
    All unfair meta-mods are now being meta-meta-modded as retarded.
  19. I'll pass by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who are eager for this sort of thing puzzle me. Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible. I don't say this to be a luddite, but there are definite limits to where I would personally go with technology.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    1. Re:I'll pass by nodwick · · Score: 4, Informative
      People who are eager for this sort of thing puzzle me. Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible. I don't say this to be a luddite, but there are definite limits to where I would personally go with technology.
      I think you're mistaking the application for this. Dozens of Slashdot posts about the Matrix notwithstanding, this isn't an elective surgery targeted towards geeks who want to get one step closer to their machines. The company line is that it's aimed primarily at quadriplegics who have a choice of either continuing to be unable to interact with their environment or having a shot at gaining some more function.

      In spirit, it's similar to prosthetic devices that people have already been developing that operate using nerve impulses, such as prosthetic legs with knees that "bend" via sensors which pick up nerve impulses in the quadriceps. It's just that with people who are more severely disabled, you're going to have to move closer to the brain to pick up live nerve impulses. It'll probably be a long time (if ever) before this moves into being an elective procedure for entertainment purposes; the Matrix-speak from the Wired article seems to be just typical media sensationalization to give the story a little more juice.

    2. Re:I'll pass by RetroGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible

      You may not have a choice, IF you want to stay competetive.

      Real Soon Now(tm) the implants will be able to be "read' by our brains. Then you have two-communication with a computer just by thinking about it.

      So, instant:
      1. computations, including complex transforms
      2. reference look up. Who needs a library?
      3. communications (holy shit, can you imagine the spam???)
      And these are just off the top of my head (pun?). I am sure that once this becomes common the applications will be endless. Just like the first computers did math (shell trajectories), then later came the cool stuff.

      I will want this!
      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:I'll pass by Dread_ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father was crippled by a severe case of polio. He caught the disease when he was only 10 years old. Because of the nerve and muscle tissue dammage he did not walk until highschool, and then only with full braces and crutches. Now that he is getting older, the neurological and muscular symptoms he had when he was 10 years old are resurfacing and he is again confined to a bed, unable to even help himself sit up, or to breathe on his own (he has a respirator connected to a trache).

      If this technology was proven and could help my father to walk or to even breathe better on his own I think it would be fantastic. DEspite his condition, my father earned three degrees (chemical engineering, mathematics, computer science). I can only imagine what he could have acomplished without his phisical limitations.

      As for being eager for it, I don't presume to know your mind, but I bet you would entertain the idea quite seriously if you were in my father's position.

      I can only imagine how someone who is paralyzed would feel if given the ability to move again. I can even see a system that would not only allow someone to transmit motor neuron function from the brain to the muscles, but also to transmit sensory neuron information to the brain from the extremeties. In essence this could be a complete loop that could allow those with spinal cord damage to actually feel again.

      I think that this is exactly where technology needs to go in this century. Not only will it allow doctors to overcome some of the most tragic and vexing medical conditions, but I believe that it will result, ultimately, in benefits to people who do not suffer from any type of ailment.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    4. Re:I'll pass by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...this isn't an elective surgery targeted towards geeks who want to get one step closer to their machines.
      It'll probably be a long time (if ever) before this moves into being an elective procedure for entertainment purposes;


      Just like plastic surgery was only used for birth defects and accident reconstruction
      Just like stomach stapling was only to be used on the morbidly obese
      Just like Viagara was only to be used for serious erectile problems

      Given a procedure, there will be some who want it (and very early on) simply because it's 'cool'. And there will be doctors who will supply it for the right sum.

    5. Re:I'll pass by dr_canak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work with spinal cord injured individuals. One patient in particular is a "locked-in" quadraplegic. What this means is that, in addition to not being able to move anything from his neck down (he is on a ventilator), he cannot speak. Because of a surgery complication, he bled into his lower brainstem, preventing any sort of muscular control of his mouth. It has also left him with a significant astigmatism and eye spasms preventing him from looking in one direction or controlling his eye gaze for any length of time (even short lengths of time like a few secs).

      So in addition to being completely paralyzed, he can't speak and can't use any eye gaze adaptive devices. He can't use his mouth for tongue depressed switches, and because of facial muscle spasms, even EMG biofeedback has been ruled-out. He is a very rare patient (condition wise) but this is the kind of technology that would really be appropriate/needed for a patient with his level of disability. So gloom and doom matrix/personal privacy issues aside, these kinds of technology can be of paramount importance to paralyzed individuals.

      And for those wondering, he communicates using an upward eye gaze and memorized letterboard.

      1 a b c d e
      2 f g h i j
      3 k l m n o
      4 p q r s t
      5 u v w x y z

      You basically go, "line 1, line 2, line 3,..." etc until he looks up (for "yes"). You then move across the correct row until he looks up to designate the letter. In this way, he can spell his way through communication. I once joked with him its like Wheel of Fortune meets Jeopardy on steroids. Cumbersome, but its the only way, and you can get surprisingly good at it with practice.

      jeff

    6. Re:I'll pass by Fr0mZer0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but I'd like to stay as far away from this as possible.

      My dad used to say the same thing about computers, ATM machines, credit cards, etc. Its a natural reaction to fear technological leaps like this. But the next generation of people will be more willing to accept it.

      The 12-30 years old will dictate if the next 20-30 years will be dubbed the cybernetic age. After all they are the early adopters, more willing to take risks to get ahead in live.

      I want to know when, in that future, will society not only accept cybernetic implants but demand them. How well will you fair at a job interview against a cyborg who codes at the speed of thought. Today's blobbing in boardrooms could foreshadow a time when employees think-chat their brainstorm sessions. The un-enhanced employee will be left behind the 8-ball. Eventually he will be looked at as a second-class citizen who is becoming more and more difficult to interact with.

      I remember there was an Outer Limits, or new Twilight Zone episode where 99% of humans were implanted and connected to a global network. The few that weren't had a brain abnormality that did not allow the enhancement. All interaction was done through the implants. All media was electronic. One scene shows an cyborg girl and un-enhanced boy go into an outdoor cafe, and the waitress is already their with her plate before she even sits down, and the waitress looks at him puzzled as to why she only got 1 order. The girl says something, sympathetically, to the effect of "Oh! I'm sorry I would have orders for both of us, but I keep forgetting you're not implanted."

  20. Cloning next ... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Then I can have a beowulf cluster of me!

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  21. I'd love one. by nate1138 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My biggest complaint about computing is that my brain->computer interface (hands to keyboard that is) is VERY low bandwidth and VERY high latency. And I know I can't be the only one that has this problem. Anybody that codes knows what I mean, you can visualize and solve the problem in your head much faster than you can get that solution into the computer.

    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    1. Re:I'd love one. by tommck · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah... it would be really cool to think about code and have it written and debugged for me... :-) It would be like a manager, only better!

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    2. Re:I'd love one. by moquist · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      ...but sometimes low bandwidth and high latency help to encourage more careful thinking, resulting in higher quality.

      Compare the quality of thought in the average email today (ignoring the ones about your P3N15) to the average handwritten letter, and you'll see what I mean.

      I think the above post about how the mind wanders is apropos; I don't think I want just *everything* from my mind able to fall right out without some sort of filter, and the fingers and the keyboard make a pretty decent filter.

      Perhaps more importantly, I don't want to have to see all the junk that spills out of somebody *else's* mind when they have Brain Broadband.

  22. One Question... by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... How can we try to control things with our brain when science doesn't fully understand the brain?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:One Question... by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We dont have to fully understand the brain in order for this to work. It's a hack, trial and error. When something works, stick with it, if it doesnt work, try something else. We dont fully understand nuclear physics, but reactors work pretty well.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
  23. CTRL-ALT-DEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can I think all three at the same time? Ahh ... I see a blue screen on the horizon.

  24. Military uses by v_1_r_u_5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is really the first step towards cyborgs, instant control for fighter pilots, enhanced soldier response, etc. When you stop to think about the potential, it's pretty fascinating and a bit scary.

  25. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, if you want realistic fighting with the chance of possible brain damage, just join the army.

  26. Hmmm... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new cyborg overlords.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  27. Just be sure to run Ad-aware every week . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Funny
    . . . or you're just asking to be turned into a walking, talking spam bot:

    "Carbon units, take heed: Lengthen your reproductive extension! Wealthen yourself through expediting currency transfer for expired-dictator spouse-counterpart! Observe vixen-type hu-mans frolicking in their dorm-units!"*

    Stefan

    * Stilted borg language added for comedic effect.

  28. Doubt it.. by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Funny

    I doubt you meet the system requirements ;) you need at least a 386...

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  29. Encryption by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 3, Funny
    How do they come up with the encryption keys?

    "Alright, now think of any number between 0 and 18446744073709551615."

    OR, if you're using 128-bit encryption:

    "...between 0 and 3.4028236692093846346337460743177x10^38"

    --
    Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
  30. Gimme Gimme Gimme!!!! by Stonan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Arthritis is really hindering my FPS ability!!

    --
    The GEEK shall inherit the earth...
  31. Another article on the same topic at PopSci by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was the cover story of the Popular Science that I just received in the mail. You can read the article here.

    --
    Do not read this sig.
  32. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by lukior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think if the implants improved to the level for use in video games they would be banned just like performance enhancing drugs like steroids are in sports.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
  33. Re:Gateway to wetware? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "After all, we only use a portion of it..."

    No, we only know what a portion of it is used for. There's a diference.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  34. Just Remember.... by hardgeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just remember our experiences from the computer world...

    NEVER use BrainJack v1.0

    Always wait for the point release!

  35. Seems great at first ... by RedA$$edMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... until you realize your being hooked up to a microsoft product. Takes the blue screen of death to a whole new level.

  36. There are upsides and downsides to this by Polarism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm going to speak on less scientific terms because i'm a cryptologist, not a nanotechnician/computer science genius ;) I see it like this: This can lead to a TON of great things that we've only seen in sci-fi movies and books and games and what not. Perhaps not exactly the same, but this is quite exciting indeed. Think about being "wired" 24/7/365, having a HUD (heads-up display) overlayed onto your vision everywhere you go, interfacing with everything it sees, no longer will we need credit cards or wallets or anything, just interface with the bank network right then and there. We will have a new level of education, kids won't have to do the K-12 thing anymore as they'll already have access to basically all known information with a single thought. They can concentrate on other things instead (which could be bad...they'd lose their innocence at a very young age). Also opens the door for nanotech, however dangerous that could prove to be. I won't elaborate on that though as this is all guesswork and just a bunch of personal theory anyway. This could also cause a devastating breakdown of society and culture, if this tech is developed enough I imagine it would really be possible to put people in a "matrix-like" state, total VR. People wouldn't want to leave. Would also cause massive changes in the political world, governments would completely change to accomodate this because your average citizen wouldn't just be running blind most of the time anymore. They'd be able to see unbiased news if they wanted instead of being brainwashed by Fox or CNN or what not. Just a few thoughts, most of them probably BS but worth thinking about.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  37. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would imagine that there would probably be separate arenas/competitions for physical-interface games and (not sure what the word is) neural-interface games. Just because, like the top-level poster said, it would generate an unfair advantage.

    Frankly, I'd prefer to see neural-interface match-ups because then the games become less of a matter of how well you can properly wield a mouse, but it relies more on strategy. Presumably, all the characters would have the same "physical" (in the game) abilities, so it would be up to the players' strategies and luck to determine who would win.

    --
    True story.
  38. To quote Randy Quaid by MajorDick · · Score: 2, Funny

    "every time the wife would turn on the microwave, I'd piss my pants and forget who I was for half-an-hour."

    Not to mention static electricity would probably be a SERIOUS phobia

  39. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by hesiod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > I would imagine that there would probably be separate arenas

    Too bad you post at zero, because that was a good point.

  40. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Rallion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, the reason I play laser tag is because I suspect it's the closest to that kind of thing that I'll ever live to see.

  41. Wow. by adun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gives the phrase Blue Screen of Death a whole new lease on terror, doesn't it?

  42. imagine the possibilities here: by draco+ni · · Score: 3, Insightful
    On the one hand, we have the very very scary.


    The company's system, called BrainGate, could help patients with no mobility to control a computer, a robot or eventually their own rewired muscles

    ...


    Surgenor said the whole system eventually will be wireless.


    Stray EMI could give you a tic. Someone malicious could actually block/redirect/subvert control of your own body, remotely.


    On the other hand... telerobotics, maybe? Use your brain to control a robot doing a dangerous job somewhere! Going into a hazardous environment from the safety of your control lab...
    Or maybe even a totally virtual environment.

  43. Safety concerns for future versions: by Rallion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Surgenor said the whole system eventually will be wireless.
    And we think cell phones are bad because they're close to out brains?
  44. My Teacher Flunked The Planet by Wired9_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An interesting book by Bruce Coville points to a similar situation...where all humans were once linked. Eventually the need for privacy grew and we created a Psyonic Barrier....I could see just such a scenario playing...

    --
    -Wired9_99
  45. Comparable to Voicemail recognition. by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I laud the effort, it will be a long time before this becomes a proper human interface. Take computer voice recognition... it's still in it's infancy despite years of 'progress'. The issues at hand:
    i) How long it takes the computer to learn how to interpret the signals and what they relate to(its training).
    ii) The training involved for the human to keep a 'steady mind'. How does the system bypass clutter?

    If those two issues are resolved or mitigated, this is a cool prospect.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  46. Re:brain r00t by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As opposed to Windows which just runs all of your thoughts as admin by default? Imagine someone crashing your optical input to get full access to your brain a la smashing SQL Server to grab a whole server.

    AAAGHH!!!! I'm blind!!!

    But, on the other hand, I'm being used to host pr0n... so is it really that bad?

    Imagine a ping o' death on your brain...

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  47. Similar technology by octal666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, about a year ago, in the Catalan Congress on Artificial Intelligence, I attended to an invited conference of a technology very similar to this. Since it was an invited conference it's not in the lecture notes, and I can't rememeber the name of the researcher, but he had a helmet that readed thoughts and could discriminate between many more than up/down, left/right and the like. The main difference was it required no surgery, they were applying it to humans, since with no surgery, it's easier to make experiments and had some pretty impressive videos. The research was being done in a European Union research facility.

    --
    DON'T PANIC
  48. Credit where credit is due... by Cutriss · · Score: 2, Informative

    For anyone that doesn't recognize this, it's an adaptation of a monologue done by Brak from the Space Ghost crew on Cartoon Network. Here's the original:

    One time I hired a monkey to take notes for me in class. I would just sit there with my mind a complete blank while the monkey scribbled on little pieces of paper. At the end of the week the teacher said, "Class, I want you to write a paper using your notes." So I wrote a paper that said "Hello, my name is Bingo. I like to climb on things. Can I have a banana? Eek eek." I got an F. When I told my Mom about it she said "I told you never trust a monkey!" The end.

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  49. Subject is misleading by bradbury · · Score: 2, Informative
    While it is beginning to be quite feasible to begin to connect neurons in the brain or motor cortex to neurons or muscles whose normal connections to the brain have been disrupted this is a far cry from a Matrix-like interface.

    Current estimates by Robert Freitas suggest that it is going to require at least a trillion nanorobots in place within the brain and most probably the installation of an extensive fiber optic network to handle the required bandwidth to provide a matrix-like interface (either for real time full bandwidth human-computer interfaces or for brain/mind uploading into a computer). This may be documented to a limited extent in Ray Kurzweil's forthcoming book The Singularity is Near (est. publication early 2005) and perhaps to a greater extent in several years when Nanomedicine Volume III is published.

  50. Warcraft3 sux by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Starcraft had some strategy depth to it.

    If you plugged your brain into Warcraft3, it'd be like,"This is your brain. This is your brain in a microwave."

    For real, I competed on a world class level for a while, so I know my shit. First one to 1500 wins.

    Blizzard must have lucked out with Starcraft, because the way they balanced Warcraft was borderline retarded.

  51. Re:Quake? Warcraft? by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hence my preference for laser tag, yes.

  52. "The Feed" by kamelkev · · Score: 2, Informative

    M.T. Anderson wrote a satire about this sort of thing. The book was called "The Feed". It's next on my list, haven't gotten to it yet.

    Amazon describes it as:

    "This brilliantly ironic satire is set in a future world where television and computers are connected directly into people's brains when they are babies. The result is a chillingly recognizable consumer society where empty-headed kids are driven by fashion and shopping and the avid pursuit of silly entertainment--even on trips to Mars and the moon--and by constant customized murmurs in their brains of encouragement to buy, buy, buy."

    Sounds interesting, and inevitable....

  53. Wireless and power... by BlueSteel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So now this device communicates over wires, which I'm assuming is also what carries power to the implant. They had said in the article they are planning on producing a self-contained wireless version (which would be really cool). My only question is how it might be powered? Would you need to go under surgery every few months to replace the battery?

    Maybe they would use glucose from our bodies to power the device? I would think though that sending a RF signal would consume a lot of juice. Anyone else have any thoughts on how they might supply power to a wireless implant?

  54. Re:qu4k3??? w4r cr4f7???/ by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Frankly, I'd prefer to see neural-interface match-ups because then the games become less of a matter of how well you can properly wield a mouse, but it relies more on strategy.

    I don't see why this would be the case. Just because the interface wouldn't be based on a mouse and keyboard doesn't mean that different people wouldn't have varying levels of skill operating the interface. It's easily conceivable that people's succeptiblity to biofeedback signals would vary just as widely as hand eye coordination.

  55. It's been a long time coming by X-Nc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Those of us who were dreaming of this back in the late 70's/early 80's will probably not get a chance to try this technology. Bummer.

    I remember when I first read a Gibson novel and he described "jacking into the Matrix"... All I could think was, I want one!

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  56. I don't like it... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Science and technology often come head to head with the inevitable moral question that just because we _can_ do something, does that mean we _should_? But let's just say that we do go down this road, and once they've been tested and proven safe, how long will it be before they are foisted upon us as mandatory, with the ulterior motive that the powers that be would not only hold us accountable for what we do, but even the way we think?

    I generally embrace new technologies, but the potential disasters that this could create for humanity gives me the total creeps.

  57. Old news by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Blind man can see thanks to a camera implanted in his brain
    I thought I read somewhere they're unable to understand the processes in the brain,
    but can reproduce the Outcome of the electronical / neurological process by chips in hopes to once understand how *that gray matter* actually works.
    Neurochips detect brain's reaction to learning

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    1. Re:Old news by Yunalesca · · Score: 2, Insightful


      What concerns me is the neuropsychological reactions this will induce in human brains. For example: if a person is without sight for a very long time - say, from early childhood until adulthood - then when that person regains vision, it can be extremely disconcerting, and he/she may actually be unable, either biologically or mentally (both, most likely) to deal with it.

      Just because you can connect the circuitry or add new parts, doesn't mean that the signals will be processed well, or that the machinery for using the signals will be able to handle the new load. How well it works will depend a lot on the individual with the implants. And it may take a whole lot of work and training the affected individual in order to make the implants effective.

      --
      The floggings will stop when morale improves.
  58. WOAH there! by strider_starslayer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think were seeing a lot of enthused people, but the technology is not what you seem to think it is.

    It's a sensor implated into the back of your head that will take directions from the you, and move around the cursor to match those directions- essentially it will at its best remove the mouse from the computer (it will probabally work as a stylus/mouse once you get used to it).

    Now this might solve a lot of RSD and Carple tunnel problems, but it's not going to let you 'download' massive ammounts of code from your brain into your computer, and it definatly isin't going to send anything back.

    And the technology isin't ever going to do that (well this particularly strain of technology, someone else will work on brain signal decoding some day- this process dosen't decode anything), this technology may however build better prostetic limbs or weelchairs, and it will allow the paralized slow, but functional, access to the itnernet (try typing on a virtual keyboard with your mouse, it's goign to be slow not matter what compared to a touch typer)

    So slow down there, I like you, cannot wait to be able to interface directly with my computer; I'm even interested in this technology (I'm starting to feel the progression of RSD on my 'mousing fingers' (I switch which hand uses the mouse every 6 monthes) and wrists), but I don't expect THIS technology to ever evolve into direct some form of neural interface, that will have to wait for someone else to develop a way to decode/encode human transmission signals.

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  59. Monkey Brains? by arothmanmusic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how long it would take an implanted monkey connected to a computer running MS Word to type up the script for "Hamlet"?