Slashdot Mirror


Infinium Labs Threatens Gaming News Site

Over the past year or two, Slashdot has run a number of stories about Infinium Labs and their Phantom Game Console (that phrase still makes me smile, every time). I think we've been generous to them, taking their game console talk at more or less face value, despite the vaporous nature of the product. Now they've decided that threats are a better plan for improving their image than producing a real product, and threatened HardOCP over an older news story. Our own Robin Miller has talked to Infinium and written up his impressions of the situation.

340 comments

  1. Litigious Bastard Powers, Activate! by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Funny

    What, are they gonna sue Penny Arcade too?

    Dude, Whoa
    I Hate The Stupid Phantom

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Litigious Bastard Powers, Activate! by Didion+Sprague · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is this Phantom thing the same as the 'Zapstation?'

      I pre-ordered the ZapStation five years ago. Someone said it was running on a Celeron 333.

      I got a pretty good price. Anyone know when they're shipping?

    2. Re:Litigious Bastard Powers, Activate! by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      What, are they gonna sue Penny Arcade too?

      Infineon should sue Infinium Labs, I was confused by the name similarity. Clearly there's precident. Maybe HardOCP should notify Infineon, and get this monkey off their back.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Litigious Bastard Powers, Activate! by Ledskof · · Score: 2, Funny

      Infinium Labs, maker of the Phantom Gaming Console, initiates the Phantom Lawsuit (tm).

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    4. Re:Litigious Bastard Powers, Activate! by lacrymology.com · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I read somewhere that they were going to synchronize its release with that of the Apple Pippin. I can't wait!

      -m

      --

      #
      # Modus Ponens
      #
    5. Re:Litigious Bastard Powers, Activate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is this Phantom thing the same as the 'Zapstation?'
      I pre-ordered the ZapStation five years ago. Someone said it was running on a Celeron 333.
      I got a pretty good price. Anyone know when they're shipping?

      Why don't you check their websites for the info?
      ZapMedia.
      ZapStation

      Things seem 'rather clear' to me.

  2. Way to win over potential customers by mwheeler01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought this kind of behavior was reserved for companies that could afford to lose customers or that had an existing customer base. What do they wish to gain? Slander is difficult to pin on someone especially new organizations if you're in the public eye.

    --
    Pretty widgets? What pretty widgets?
    1. Re:Way to win over potential customers by loserbert · · Score: 1

      C'mon man! Any company can do dumbass things to kill themselves. It's practically a requirement nowadays.

    2. Re:Way to win over potential customers by Naito · · Score: 5, Funny

      um, like SCO? what customers?

    3. Re:Way to win over potential customers by EvilAlien · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I don't think they are at the "potential customer" phase of their business plan. I believe they are still at the "potential product" phase, since Rob's articles suggests they have finally passed the "potential office space" phase.

      The Phantom isn't vaporware... the COMPANY is vaporware. These guys are probably failed spammers... what is Bachus going to have once Infiniwhatsit strips him of his credibility?

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    4. Re:Way to win over potential customers by cgenman · · Score: 2, Funny

      "hmmm... We have this console, which has been running for two years, 25 million dollars in venture capital, offices on both coasts, 60 onboard developers, and boxes and boxes of beta units just ready to go, but people still think we're vaporware. How do we let gamers know that we have a real product ready to sell for the 2004 christmas season?"

      "I know! Let's sue a journalist!"

      "No, no. Too harsh. All people want is a solid, physical unit shipped to a news magazine like IGN for their inspection. Why don't we take one of those thousands of beta units we have in the warehouse, load it up with Metroid Prime like in the screenshots, and ship it to IGN with a mockup console hacked out over the weekend in Flash? We could easily hook it into our existing nationwide network of game servers we had to put up for our Beta."

      "I really think you should consider the 'suing a journalist' option."

      "Is that really the best way to leverage our company's assets? What if we just threatened to sue?"

      "It is a proportionate response. No journalist worth their salt would imperil their career by standing up to a threat to sue. By being benevolent and just threatening to sue, people will know you have weight behind your claims."

      "How's the mansion Bob?"

      "Great. Yours Frank?"

      "Peachy Keen."

    5. Re:Way to win over potential customers by dellis78741 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The project is a goner long ago. Getting the article removed is simply an attempt to cover his tracks before he launches another scheme to vacuum up investor money. He doesn't want some future journalist to dig this up when he's doing a new song-and-dance for the monied crowd.

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
  3. Go Infinium.. or something.. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    I'm no legal strategist but wouldn't it be smarter for Infinium to actually demo one of these consoles then go after HardOCP for slander/defamation/whatever? Right now it sounds like they don't like the attacks on their vapourware. My idea assumes, naturally, that Infinium actuall has a Phantom console to demo...

    Infinium needs to shit or get off the pot (ala SCO)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It can't be considered slander since the statements were made in a published article. Libel would be the correct terminology.

    2. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by Seth+Finklestein · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm an annoying punter but wouldn't it be smarter for Infinium to actually demo one of these consoles...

      The Phantom console is real. It was demoed at CES. Penny Arcade, HardOCP, and other so-called "news sites" are slandering the company. I don't need to tell you how poor of an "editor" Michael Sims is for publishing such a biased article on Slashdot.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Game Industry Maven

      --
      I'm not Seth Finkelstein. I still speak the truth.
    3. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by hchaos · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm no legal strategist but wouldn't it be smarter for Infinium to actually demo one of these consoles then go after HardOCP for slander/defamation/whatever? Right now it sounds like they don't like the attacks on their vapourware. My idea assumes, naturally, that Infinium actuall has a Phantom console to demo...
      It would be smarter, because they could then show that the HardOCP's statements were in fact false, which is necessary for a libel or defamation claim, but they wouldn't win anyway, because they would still have to show that HardOCP knew the statements were false. And the "use of Infinium's proprietary images ... with the intent to tarnish Infinium's image and dilute the value of its name" isn't going to get them anywhere, because HardOCP is a news organization, and has a lot of protections against this kind of thing, and definitely is not subject to trademark issues on this matter.

      The letter is probably nothing more than legal posturing, intended to scare the little guy, but of little use to anyone who has their own lawyer.
    4. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by The+Gline · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That they had a prototype unit up and running does not make it real. Real is when they have them coming off the assembly line and available in stores.

      The negative news surrounding the company is because they have promised the moon and delivered squat. Game library: no show. Alliances with developers: zilch. The unit itself? As far as I can tell, ONE prototype was demoed. A prototype is not proof that the device is being mass-manufactured.

      Can I buy the console? No. Can I play anything on it? Not really. Ergo: vapor.

      --
      Honorary Member of Jackie Chan's Kung Fu Process Servers
    5. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infinium is going through a major reorganization right now.

      Tim has hired on some big names, a few from X-Box fame, and there is money in the bank. They're going back, doing things they should have been doing all along.

    6. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by faust2097 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I've seen they have yet to show a working prototype that is actually playing games on it. They have a giant aluminum box with a PC case concealed entirely within it that they plug in and the logo on the front lights up.

      When I first heard of the Phantom I assumed it was one of those startups that exists for the purpose of failing but getting the founders paid while it happens. There's a lot of dumb people out there with a lot of money to throw around. At this point though it seems like they're going to go through with the whole thing and it's going to suck as much as we all think it will.

      One funny side note, it appears that the champions of overdone Flash BS, 2advanced, have made a "strategic marketing alliance" with Infinium Labs. If this means that they're not getting cash up front for their work they're in for a nasty shock.

    7. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by phil+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't the truth an absolute defense against libel?

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    8. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by darkmayo · · Score: 1

      At CES they did have a small demo for a few Ziff Davis reporters and what not. 1up.com has the report on that. So there is a machine that plays games and is all shiney looking but its not really about the hardware is it considering its really just a PC. Does the delivery system work, do they have the server for said delivery system do they actually game developers who want to work with this niche product.

      If the Troll who posted below is right then they would be looking to make the Phantom certain providers, sort of like PPV in hotels and what not, if this is the case then they need to convey this to the consumer, the "made by gamers for gamers" and every other little tidbit that I have read regarding phantom suggests they do want this to be bought in stores.

      --
      "I am a kernel in the linux army"
    9. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by screwballicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The prototype proves one thing:

      They can demonstrate a nice PC case mod.

      They have NOT demonstrated the ability to for example produce peripherals. They are using off the shelf logitech peripherals, as demonstrated in their screenshots.

      And I could easily be wrong, but the Phantom logo on that logitech keyboard just looks photoshopped on to me.

    10. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oye.. And it's not even a nice case mod. It's just a POS.

    11. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The Phantom is a relatively standard PC with a very [i]un[/i]standard content delivery system. Their demo for 1UP consisted of the gaming end, not the content delivery end. That's fundamentally no different than me demoing a game on my MegaSpecterGhostotron gaming console that I'm typing on right now.

    12. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

      It's just a AMD XP/Nforce based NC/terminal running XP embedded, with any games running off RAM via a broadband connection.

      Meaning all that's in the box is prabably a mini ATX NForce motherboard (with embedded audio, video, ethernet & USB) some RAM & a AMD CPU.

      The venture capital is probably hypothetically needed to create a natio-wide subscription based broadband network for delivering the games. Well at a guess I'd say that's what his spiel is to investors.

    13. Re:Go Infinium.. or something.. by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      I think they used that massive back projection screen to try and make that humungous POS aircraft-hanger of a "console" look dainty.

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  4. What a great way to get gamers to buy your product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sue a well known gaming website.

    /Guinness beer dude

    BRILLIANT!

  5. Bad move by zeux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We did the same with DNF but 3D Realms never did something like that.

    That's maybe why lots of people here still think DNF is not vaporware ;)

    1. Re:Bad move by debian4life · · Score: 5, Funny

      You gave me an idea. 3D Realms(DNF) can claim that Vaporware is their intellectual property and sue Infinium for infringing on that.

  6. The next step... by zz99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next step in their buisness plan is perhaps to do a SCO

    How about suing another console vendor for $1 Billion for infringing on IP in their vaporware console?

    1. Re:The next step... by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Nah...turns out they bought the remaining assets of some company from the 70s that made a pong console, therefore they have the sole rights to any console game or derivative.

      After all, without Infinium knowhow, there is no way Sony or Nintendo could have succeeded with the PS2 or GameCube.

  7. Losers. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    I preemptively named my software company The Vapour Software Company, so that when people read articles about my late products they just think the writer is mentioning the name of my company again and again. The later my producs, the better the free advertising!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  8. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This will be the first console that will have a port of Duke Nukem Forever.

  9. How To Make Friends, corporate edition by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lackey: Sir, we're not catching enough flies!
    President: Very well. Activate the Vinegar Device!

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  10. Is Andre Lamothe there? by SpaceRook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I seem to remember Andre LaMothe being associated with this project. Is he still there? The dude has put together some great game programming books.

    1. Re:Is Andre Lamothe there? by Michalson · · Score: 4, Informative

      He's got his own console type thing (it seems to be directed at developers, since it's of the "make it yourself" breed not seen in the last 20 years). Try the official site XGameStation

    2. Re:Is Andre Lamothe there? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Which still hasn't come out, though it was promised for december last year :-(

  11. hmm... by NeoGeo64 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this thing supposed to come out, like, what, a year ago?

    I still want my Indrema!

  12. Interesting Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Step 1: Alienate your potential customer base by threatening to sue anyone who says anything bad about you. And make sure to get as much bad press as possible, before the product is even released.

    Step 2: ???

    Step 3: Profit!

    1. Re:Interesting Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No exposure is bad exposure. They just got a load more articles written about their console, without having to invest in any design or development work.

    2. Re:Interesting Business Plan by mcc · · Score: 1

      Step 2 is "Abscond with the investor money while your company folds".

  13. Time to make some money by MBraynard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else here want to short this publicly traded turkey?

    1. Re:Time to make some money by SoTuA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ooooh, big profit. :)

      I borrow at 1.5 cents a share and buy them back at one cent a share!

      And I'll do it with ONE THOUSAND SHARES! (pinky to motuh a la Dr. Evil) Muahahahaha!

    2. Re:Time to make some money by rcs1000 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it's not publically traded.

      They might have found getting through the due diligence process tough. And the lack of (allegedly) a real physical presence would have been a bummer.

      MMMmmmm...

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    3. Re:Time to make some money by MBraynard · · Score: 4, Informative
      NO.

      It is publicly traded. See here!

      Just what made you think they weren't?

  14. Don't look behind the curtain by curtisk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is the VC cash running out? What are they trying to keep "under the radar"? Their CEO at least is making a grand living producing nothing.....is this bad press pissing on their gravy train perhaps?

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  15. In related news.... by reverendG · · Score: 4, Funny

    SCO announced today in a press release that they have acquired ownership of Infinium Labs and all rights to the Phantom game console.

    In news related to this related news, legal procedings have been initiated against Slashdot, Penny Arcade, and the chick who used to work for Infinium who said something on Slashdot.

    --

    Why should I argue rationally with someone being irrational? I'll just mock them instead.
  16. This is damn sad. by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I have to give props to Roblimo for having the courage to have a bit of satirical fun with this, it almost makes me want to cry to realize that things have gotten this absurd.

    Has the business world become so totally detached from reality that they honestly believe that they shouldn't be criticised for something as blatantly bullshit as this? What kind of strange alternate reality is this company living in?

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    1. Re:This is damn sad. by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What kind of strange alternate reality is this company living in?

      The United States of America.

      --

      - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

    2. Re:This is damn sad. by Nic-o-demus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What kind of strange alternate reality is this company living in?

      The reality of greed. I've known people like this. I agree completely with you- it's very, very sad. There is a kind of personality that craves "luxeries." Even before they have made any money, if they go on a business trip, they like to be in the nice hotel, to sit in the hot-tub, to eat expensive chocolates. Then they get some money, usually through some fluke or because some other greedy person has been duped, and then for the rest of their lives, they feel like they deserve that kind of income. So then they spend the rest of their lives (or until they have a real life changing experience *cross fingers*) doing everything they can to maintain it. They sponsor nascars, they buy stock in airlines, they blow through venture capital without any accountability or sense of responsibility- it's simply the money they deserve. A lot of criminals (of the enron sort) are made this way.

      It's worse than a drug habit, because the whole world is telling them on some level that what they're doing is "success." As inneffective as it often is, it is good that society in general can tell a person "your drug habit is destroying your life." In the world of greed, though, this rarely happens. Instead, the person is circled by his greedy lawyers (tm) and business friends and political friends in high places. (I'm not saying those professions are all greedy- it's just that the greedy among them clump together).

      Anyway, whether you make money or not, if you feel you would ever be susceptible to that feeling/habit, the one thing that we as humans can do despite popular culture's teachings is change our own character and personality with concious effort. The reason "Riches Don't Make you Happy" sounds so cliche is because it's true. And yet how many of us can actually be honest with ourselves and admit we believe that money will make us happier. Anyway, now I'm rambling. That's my brief overview of the altered reality of greed.

      For the record- I LOVE INFINIUM LABS! Those terrible things the journalists said about you can't be true, and nothing I said in this post should in any way be construed to be referencing any of your noble founders.

    3. Re:This is damn sad. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. They just realize that they have a chance of getting away with it. The only thing they believe in is power and money - for them. It's a very prevalent attitude right now, and it's really, really screwing up commerce in the US. Almost as much as the insane governmental regs.

  17. [H]ardOCP's response: by freidog · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have extended HardOCP.com's pledge to correct any and all possible inconsistencies or errors in our editorial entitled "Behind the Phantom Console" personally to Timothy Roberts and Kevin Bachus of Infinium Labs and they have yet to inform HardOCP.com of any information we presented as being not correct. This courtesy was extended on September 17, 2003, the date the article was published and has been extended several times since then with no reply ever being received by HardOCP.com. It is my opinion that Infinium Labs' only interest is stifling HardOCP.com and our opinions. HardOCP.com still stands by our thoughts and opinions put forth in our editorial and no amount of legal badgering and frivolous lawsuits will change those opinions that we have shared with our readers.
    _____________________________
    Kyle Bennett
    Editor-in-Chief @ HardOCP.com


    Nice to see they have no intention of rolling over.

    1. Re:[H]ardOCP's response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who cares about karma? Modding is for the readers not for the writers.

      I think you confused this site with an online MMORPG

  18. Good for HardOCP! by NSash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is our official response in regards to this matter:

    I have extended HardOCP.com's pledge to correct any and all possible inconsistencies or errors in our editorial entitled "Behind the Phantom Console" personally to Timothy Roberts and Kevin Bachus of Infinium Labs and they have yet to inform HardOCP.com of any information we presented as being not correct. This courtesy was extended on September 17, 2003, the date the article was published and has been extended several times since then with no reply ever being received by HardOCP.com. It is my opinion that Infinium Labs' only interest is stifling HardOCP.com and our opinions. HardOCP.com still stands by our thoughts and opinions put forth in our editorial and no amount of legal badgering and frivolous lawsuits will change those opinions that we have shared with our readers.

    It's good to see a website refusing to be intimidated by spurious legal threats. To often, all it takes is the sound of a lawyer clearing his throat to get a website owner to panic and pull content. Of course, HardOCP is not exactly a two-bit operation, and Infinium Labs is far from a massive corporation, but I'll take my victories where I can. Here's to the free press.

    1. Re:Good for HardOCP! by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or they could just purge every mention of the Phantom from their website and wash their hands of it. I know it would look like they were giving in, but honestly I don't think I'd want my website to show up on a Google search of "Phantom Console" or "Infinium Labs".

  19. Legal action (well..sort of) by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

    for something they don't own/have.

    *COUGH* Sco *COUGH*

    --
    Sig it.
  20. $1,250,100 ... by Magus311X · · Score: 5, Funny

    $1,250,100.

    Is it just me, or is anyone else wondering about that $100? I mean, $1.25 million is a nice, round number. Easy to remember and deal with, but that $100 extra is some sort of ugly wart at the end.

    What is it? A birdbath? Prettier shingles? What honestly adjusts the price of a house by $100?!

    ----- ----- -----

    1. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's the assessment value used to calculate the guy's taxes, not the sale price of the house. Every dollar counts when doing taxes.

    2. Re:$1,250,100 ... by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a $1.25M house, but the dude framed the first $100 bill he ever stole, and hung it in the foyer. Hence, $1,250,100.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you looked at the bottom of the Property Appraiser's Page, you would see that the last transaction on the property was when it was sold in 2001 for $100.00. That's where it comes from.

    4. Re:$1,250,100 ... by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      What's more - how did this property sell for $100? Is it really worth one and a quarter mil? If so, what's the story behind this apparant gift?

    5. Re:$1,250,100 ... by dafunn · · Score: 1

      Eh, that's just so Mr. Choad can claim he paid "more than 1.25 meeleeyun dollars" for his house.

      Of course, he only makes that claim after the initial claim that he paid $3M for it, and someone investigates and counterclaims it was only $1.25M, and then he threatens to sue because the sale price was actually greater than $1.25M....

    6. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Cutriss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bender: You put a one and two zeros at the end of that and you got yourself a deal!

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    7. Re:$1,250,100 ... by NoOneMuch · · Score: 3, Funny

      He bought the house on eBay, and the extra $100 is what won the bid. ;-)

    8. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is a "foyer?"

      I hear that all the time. A "foyer".

      "Hey, Bob, drop it in the foyer."

      I'm looking around: "The what?"

      "Huh?"

      "Drop what where?"

      "Drop that. In the foyer."

      "What the fuck is a foyer?"

      Can someone explain?

    9. Re:$1,250,100 ... by 36526542DD · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is him selling the house to a relative or associate for $100, to protect the house from litigation and bankrupcy.

      That way, when his virtual house of cards comes falling down, which it will, he still has a physical house to go back to.

      Dishonest people filing for bankrupcy (which accounts for about 98% of bankrupcies) often transfer assets into the names of their children, etc to avoid losing them.

    10. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that OJ bought a house in FL and everyone wondered why at the time and it turns out that it is because the FL laws apparently prevent taking the primary residence from someone based on legal monetary claims against them.
      I don't really have to say it, do I?

    11. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lobby. Wherever the front door is, it'll be the bit that's just inside from there, assuming it's a fairly large building. It's usually a fairly open space.

    12. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      Florida laws are interesting when it comes to homes...they have protections so that you can not loose your home in legal action. That is one reason why so many elites have multi-million dollar homes in Florida.

      I remember reading an article that stated this when discussing the assets of some of the Enron execs.

    13. Re:$1,250,100 ... by EMR · · Score: 1

      Appraiser details. Click the "transfers button". AFAICT he bought the thing for $100!!.

    14. Re:$1,250,100 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's usually a fairly open space.

      Yeah, we call that a room.

  21. OK NERDS, LISTEN UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm going to spell this out for you now, and after it is proven, I will reference this post.

    Lyssa Watson is a dude. He's posting with a chick's name, signing with kitty ASCII art and "with love", because he knows you fools will mod him up. Just because you sexless wonders think he's actually female and that your mod points entitles you to a chance.

    Unfortunately, it will work. It always does. When the account has some real nice karma going for it, it will be troll after troll. And you'll cry into the last tissue from your bedside box of kleenex, most of which was used up while thinking about how you may one day meet Lyssa Watson.

    1. Re:OK NERDS, LISTEN UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how in the hell do you know? You magically know all of this based off 2 posts?

  22. Re:through my eyes by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, now you did something right.

    But the conspiracy theorist in me is wondering how someone 'new around here' in one article just happens to have worked for the company featured in the very next one ;^>

    quite a coincience you have to admit.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  23. Article In Question... by Metal_Demon · · Score: 3, Informative
    I believe This is the article in question.

    Anyways, anybody who is trying to sell stuff to the geek community needs to realize that most geeks just get pissed off by these companies bitching about stuff like this. Making threats(bullying) and trying to censor people(notice the .sig) annoys me.

    --
    Trust Your Technolust
  24. Put Up or Shut Up by Kurt+Wall · · Score: 1

    All Infinium needs to do is show the goods. HardOCP has repeatedly offered to retract factual inaccuracies provided Infinium identifies what the inaccuracies are. As it is, they're threatening to sue because someone called their bluff.

    1. Re:Put Up or Shut Up by PS2+INFORMANT · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is something unlikely to happen. I have posted on their closed Phantom forums for quite sometime now and Hard OCP is often discussed. No one from the company or any of the supporters can offer any sort of official counter to much of anything said in the article. So far all they seem to complaign about is Tim's age being posted wrong, not a very good case for a defamation lawsuit if you ask me. They ignore inquaries into counter claims for the rest of the article. They also threaten to ban anyone who speaks of Hard OCP on their forums, most people who are skeptical rutinely have their posts deleted, censored, closed, or ignored. For the longest period of time you couldn't even link to the Hard OCP article in question, any mention of Hard OCP on the boards was displayed as Hard Opinionated corrupt propaganda which is amusing since that statement can easily be turned around to apply to them. The only thing close to an official response given by the company was posted on the forums, it was taken down a short time later probably due to the fact that all it basically said to the members was "They are lying, trust us." In short Infinium seems to be a lousy excuse for a competent company, can't answer to criticism, can't produce a product, can't explain exactly how projected product will work etc, It is amusing to confront the few diehard fans they have on the boards with hardcore facts though, something I shall continue to do until honest answers to my questions emerge.

  25. I had no idea..... by loserbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nobody ever told me that I'm a nerd before. Oh well....

  26. Best Damn Gaming Company on the Planet by toupsie · · Score: 4, Funny
    Even though Infinium Labs hasn't released one product for the consumer gaming market, I would like to be on the record saying that Infinium Labs is the best damn gaming company on planet earth and the COO has a nice house.

    Just covering my bases...I hate lawyer letters...

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Best Damn Gaming Company on the Planet by Alsee · · Score: 1

      P.S.
      SCO rocks!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Best Damn Gaming Company on the Planet by nolife · · Score: 4, Funny

      A++++++++++++++++++ Great company, would buy if they ever make something.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:Best Damn Gaming Company on the Planet by davew2040 · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but I think you accidentally added " letter" in there somehow :/

    4. Re:Best Damn Gaming Company on the Planet by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Tim Roberts, is that you? Man, we really need the Slashdot editors to pull an Amazon and tell us who posted this review.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  27. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    This is a new troll account and all of the above is pure bullshit.

    Let's see - this person is claiming to be Lyssa Watson but the domain the account links to is registered to Lisa Sabin. Furthermore, no Lyssa Watson has ever been employed at Infinium. Check the history of this account for further proof that this is thinly veiled disinformation in an attempt to gain karma [from moron mods] to further troll activities.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm curious as to how you know Infinium's employment history.

      That doesn't discount what you're saying re: bullshit troll account, but it is strange that you know Infinium's all-time employment roster.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not saying your wrong at all.I just dont know (nor do I much care really)
      But Mr/Mrs/Miss AC, how is it you know Infiniums employment history? I looked on google and found no evidence of any Mr/Mrs/Miss Anonymous Coward ever having been employed by Infinium.
      I checked slashdot and found that you have mostly been responsible for a great number of missinformed posts, flaimes,and even a decent number of outright lies.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  28. Website gone? by Talvi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it just me or has their website vaporized as well?

    1. Re:Website gone? by potus98 · · Score: 1


      Try phantom.net instead of infiniumlabs.com. Of course, it'll probably be /.'d too...

      --
      This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    2. Re:Website gone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone notice that the law firm that sent the notice has the domain www.mofo.com :) you would think they would have taken moandfo or something

    3. Re:Website gone? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "Try phantom.net instead of infiniumlabs.com. Of course, it'll probably be /.'d too..."

      With a 1.1 MB flash front page, it won't be long now.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  29. Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, the HardOCP article is more of an attack on the credibility of the founder of the company. While it's nothing but a listing of hard facts, it paints a very bleak picture of Tim Robert's competence as an entrepreneur. Essentially, it charges that many of the companies he worked for were failures, and the only ones which are still operational (or could at least be contacted) had family members working in high places there. The only exception to this is a company that went IPO a couple of years after he left and then sunk to the point of being threatened with delisting. They basically come out and say that the man is a multi-time loser who has wasted millions of investor dollars and whose business doesn't even have a physical office -- just a bunch of press releases.

    As a news organization, HardOCP has a lot going for them in a slander/libel case. The only thing I think which they might be liable on is the implication (not a direct statement) that Tim Roberts being at WorldCom was somehow related to the bankruptcy of WorldCom.

    As for the trademark violations, IANAL, so I don't know how liable a news organization can be for using a company's name and logo in a report without their permission. I doubt that they're going to be in any serious trouble, so long as they go back and place "tm's" on everything, but trademark law has surprised me many times before.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by AndyBusch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Holy cow! Someone used libel and liable both correctly and both in the same post.

      You just made my morning.

    2. Re:Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by ajs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the article is a very well-crafted case against this guy's credibility. I would be shocked if they wanted to actually take this one to court. The hope on the part of Infinium must have been that this pissant little website would bow under legal threat and retract, regardless.

      Oops ;-)

    3. Re:Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Have to wait to read the article at home, but any libel case is difficult because you have to prove malace. Infinium would have to prove intent. If the facts paint a bleak picture, then so be it. But do you really think HardOCP was intending to drive business away from Infinium?

    4. Re:Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Yeah but would thay have spelled lose, correctly?

    5. Re:Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      But do you really think HardOCP was intending to drive business away from Infinium?

      Oh yes, very clearly. HardOCP was essentially pointing out that the company was as much of a Phantom as its namesake product. It had no offices to speak of at the time the article was written, only a mail box. That casts serious doubt on them having actually had a research lab and employees at the time, especially because they claimed to already have an office, when they didn't.

      Additionally, they cast very serious doubt on the credibility of the chief executive of the company's competence by listing all the failed businesses he worked at, and pointing out that of all the ones that still exist, he had relatives there in high places (implicating nepotism) or they are hardly considered successful.

      The article was a very compelling argument that he shouldn't be trusted with investor's money, and HardOCP even went so far as to warn that investors tossing money at Tim Roberts were "throwing the dice."

      Malice is easy to prove. The falsity of their claims is not, and is the strongest part of HardOCP's case against Infinium. You can be as utterly malevolent as you want so long as you never lie.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    6. Re:Not an attack on the hardware, per se... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy cow! Someone used libel and liable both correctly and both in the same post.

      But someone made a classic use/mention mistake in their post:

      Someone used 'libel' and 'liable' both correctly and both in the same post.

  30. seems like their site is down.. by ashot · · Score: 5, Funny

    The console must also double as a server.

    --
    -ashot
    1. Re:seems like their site is down.. by Iamnoone · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Not unless their console runs :
      Windows Server 2003
      IIS 6.0
      ASP.NET

      From http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.phan tom.net check out their server/hosting change history - 6 different IP blocks and hosting companies in the last year...:
      Windows Server 2003 Microsoft-IIS/6.0 27-Jan-2004 69.59.176.20 ServePath, LLC
      Windows Server 2003 Microsoft-IIS/6.0 2-Oct-2003 69.59.138.220 American Registry for Internet Numbers
      Windows 2000 Microsoft-IIS/5.0 7-Sep-2003 129.41.63.115 IBM Corporation
      Linux Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_perl/1.26 PHP/4.2.2 FrontPage/5.0.2 mod_ssl/2.8.12 OpenSSL/0.9.6b 17-Aug-2003 12.106.77.147 ENFRASTRUCTURE
      Windows 2000 Microsoft-IIS/5.0 20-Jun-2003 216.23.47.122 Linc Inc.
      Windows 2000 Microsoft-IIS/5.0 26-Jan-2003 129.41.63.115 IBM Corporation
      Linux Apache/1.3.14 Ben-SSL/1.41 (Unix) mod_throttle/2.11 mod_perl/1.24_01 PHP/4.0.3pl1 FrontPage/4.0.4.3 rus/PL30.0 28-Jul-2001 209.203.195.108 Direct Marketing Entertainment, LLC
      Linux Apache/1.3.12 Ben-SSL/1.38 (Unix) PHP/3.0.15 FrontPage/4.0.4.3 rus/PL29.4 3-Dec-2000 209.236.9.108 PG & C Leasing, INC
    2. Re:seems like their site is down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait?

    3. Re:seems like their site is down.. by KevboY2K · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are switching DNS servers with very bad timing, and although it looks like the "slashdot effect," it in fact is not. You should be able to reach it in some parts of the country and not others right now based on if your ISP has updated it's DNS listings yet. They did the same thing with http://forum.phantom.net/ last night. Don't believe me? http://69.59.176.19/ says it all.

  31. Interesting by CrypticSpawn · · Score: 1

    A few months back I remember seeing that 2Advanced did some flash for them. If you know about 2advanced, you will know they aren't cheap. Anyway, I was watching the forums and waiting for this thing to come out. Needless to say, I forgot about them, so I think this is just a way to drum up some publicity, I know they are probably getting slashdotted to hell by now.

  32. Why not suing Gamespy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would certainly buy their product if only they would sue Gamespy out of existance. I can't stand Gamespy's biased "journalism" sponsor mirrored here at slashdot anymore.

    Oh.. and despite my numerous wishes for a change the games.slashdot.org colors are still a pain.

  33. Dude. by bad+enema · · Score: 1

    Would you post your real name at Slashdot?

    Think about it.

    1. Re:Dude. by bad+enema · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "YOU FUCKING THINK ABOUT IT YOU FUCKING MORON. DO YOU THINK THAT THIS LYSSA WATSON ACCOUNT IS NOT A TROLLING ACCOUNT?!??!!"

      Hey looks like someone's already ran all the scenarios through their head. Given this, and the fact that you've looked through the account makes you the pathetic loser. "Do you believe that by coming to "her" defense, she'll e-mail you privately and then you can meet and make sweet love? You're fucking pathetic"

      I don't post my email address here publicly.

      Damn, you ever tired of being wrong?

  34. Actually, it's libel. by *weasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slander regards spoken insults, in print it's called libel. That aside, it isn't libel if it's the truth. So long as nothing HardCOP said was fabricated - it's an open and shut deal. Infinium is just wasting even more time and money not making games.

    Why the hell does Infinium labs care now, five months later? If they felt wronged by the story, you'd think they'd have at least demanded a retraction back when it broke. So my guess is that this is the only way they can get back in the headlines anymore. They probably had some press release recently that was passed over by the media - so now they're fighting to be remembered.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they were consulting their lawyers, checking to see what they could do about it. Then they could even spend some time doing research about HARCOP's sources...

    2. Re:Actually, it's libel. by calbanese · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, if they were disparagin the product, its not slander or libel. Those are reserved for people. If its a product, its injurious falsehood.

    3. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Winkhorst · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Doesn't there actually have to BE a product?

      In any event, I just sent the following email to their corporate lawyers, who, amazingly enough, go by the acronym MOFO:

      Gentlemen:

      First let me say that your corporate name, MOFO, sounds as if it were specifically designed to strike fear into the hearts of anyone you deal with. Or perhaps you just don't understand the slang meaning of the term MOFO.

      I have just read the article, "Behind the Infinium Phantom Console," at the HardOCP site against which you have apparently issued a nasty letter in your best lawyerly legalese. I am curious, since I take the idea of freedom of speech quite seriously, just why exactly your client and you refused to supply the above mentioned site with any information as to what exactly you found inaccurate or distressing about that article. Personally, I found it quite enlightening and informative. Just for the record, just what exactly DO you find inaccurate about this story? I am always interested in learning the truth and I look forward to your reply so that I may further my knowledge of this company and its director.

      Regards,

      [deleted]

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    4. Re:Actually, it's libel. by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "I am curious, since I take the idea of freedom of speech quite seriously"

      Is the federal or a state government trying to shut down HardOCP, or forcing them to retract an article?

      In other words, how is this a 'freedom of speech' issue?

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    5. Re:Actually, it's libel. by plenTpak · · Score: 4, Informative

      mofo's been featured on slashdot before: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/15/195620 0

      mofo seems to be a contraction of Morrison & Foerster LLP.

    6. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assume HardOCP is writing constitutionally protected speech (i.e. content that is not libelous, hate speech, or any of the other things that have been declared not protected under the 1st Amendment). If that is the case, then another individual / company / lawyers may not use the courtroom to squelch them.

      To put it another way, if they actually sued HardOCP, then HardOCP could get the whole thing thrown out on 1st Amendment grounds by showing what they said is protected.

    7. Re:Actually, it's libel. by goldspider · · Score: 4, Informative
      "Assume HardOCP is writing constitutionally protected speech...then another individual / company / lawyers may not use the courtroom to squelch them."

      Infinium Labs would go to court to prove that HardOCP's article was libelous, and therefor not protected speech. One of two outcomes would occur:

      A. The court agrees with Infinium Labs, ruling that the article is not, in fact, protected speech. HardOCP is punished and this case is not a First Amendment issue.

      B. The court agrees with HardOCP, ruling that the article is protected speech. Infinium Labs' case is thrown out, and this case is not a First Amendment issue.

      So either way, this is not a First Amendment issue. Try again.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    8. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Winkhorst · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was not specifically refering to constitutional prohibitions on the limiting of freedom of speech by the government. It is my personal opinion that freedom of speech is important in any environment, whether governmental or not. And whether this broader protection is guaranteed by any legal document or not, it is certainly a basic human right to be able to speak your mind as long as you don't infringe on the rights of others, for instance, my right not to have to wade though 500 pieces of junk email everyday.

      Focusing on what is actually happening here, at the very least it appears that a particular company is using its monetary power to usurp the courts for the purpose of shutting up someone who, again at the very least, appears to be bringing up some rather embarrassing points about the history of a particular corporate executive associated with that company. It is certainly important that the public in general and investors in particular be aware of this history, for it directly affects the viability of that company.

      The flaw in the system seems to be that it requires significant sums of money to defend oneself against this kind of attack, so that, in my own humble opinion, it is incumbent upon the courts to see that any such misuse is punished to such an extent that it dissuades others from attempting to protect their good names by stifling all suggestion that that good name may have been purchased with advertising dollars and not with acts of merit.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    9. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why the hell does Infinium labs care now, five months later?

      It's hard to access the internet when you don't have any offices.

    10. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      Is the federal or a state government trying to shut down HardOCP, or forcing them to retract an article?

      Indirectly, yes.

      MOFO is relying on state and/or federal law and the threat of force via the judiciary to silence a member of the press.

    11. Re:Actually, it's libel. by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "MOFO is relying on state and/or federal law and the threat of force via the judiciary to silence a member of the press."

      And if, in a court of law, it is determined that HardOCP committed libel, they should be silenced, or at least punished proportionally to the crime.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    12. Re:Actually, it's libel. by goldspider · · Score: 1
      "...it appears that a particular company is using its monetary power to usurp the courts for the purpose of shutting up someone who, again at the very least, appears to be bringing up some rather embarrassing points about the history of a particular corporate executive associated with that company."

      They aren't usurping the courts in the least. If HardOCP committed libel, and Infinium sues them for it, they are using the court system in precisely the way it was intended.

      "It is certainly important that the public in general and investors in particular be aware of this history, for it directly affects the viability of that company."

      Unless of course that information as presented in the article isn't true. If that is the case, Infinium has every right to sue.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    13. Re:Actually, it's libel. by crymeph0 · · Score: 1
      A. The court agrees with Infinium Labs, ruling that the article is not, in fact, protected speech. HardOCP is punished and this case is not a First Amendment issue.

      B. The court agrees with HardOCP, ruling that the article is protected speech. Infinium Labs' case is thrown out, and this case is not a First Amendment issue.

      If it's not a First Amendment issue, then what are you implying protects the speech?

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    14. Re:Actually, it's libel. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      [To mofo.com] First let me say that your corporate name, MOFO, sounds as if it were specifically designed to strike fear into the hearts of anyone you deal with. Or perhaps you just don't understand the slang meaning of the term MOFO.

      Vincent Flanders of Web Pages That Suck used Morrison & Foerster LLP (mofo.com) as an example of bad domain name choice. The other one used as an example was analtech.com (that's right, it's not that kind of company =)

      The article is no longer on the WPTS site, but the WPTS book has this bit: "...I received a lot of e-mail explaining the choice. Basically, the law firm knows what it means, and they're proud of their name because they want to have the image of a law firm you don't want to mess with."

    15. Re:Actually, it's libel. by milo_Gwalthny · · Score: 1

      You don't want to send that letter because, in addition to a reply, you'll get a bill. And the three hours of partner time and ten hours of associate time answering that question will take will cost you, say, $3,800.00.

      --
      Milo
    16. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at B again. What do you think is protecting the speech, bub?

    17. Re:Actually, it's libel. by goldspider · · Score: 1
      If you insist on picking nits...

      A. The court agrees with Infinium Labs, ruling that the article is in fact libelous. HardOCP is punished and this case is not a First Amendment issue.

      B. The court agrees with HardOCP, ruling that the article is not libelous. Infinium Labs' case is thrown out, and this case is not a First Amendment issue.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    18. Re:Actually, it's libel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget libel and slander. There should more importantly be another rule that states that whomsoever points out the difference between libel and slander in ordinary conversation, shall be hoisted from the nearest tree and hanged until they be most certainly dead with the strongest of rope available.

  35. Answer by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    A county assessor.

  36. Calling shenanigans by msgmonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    I call shenanigans on this post, namely because:

    1) "Macroscale Design" is n't a degree I've heard of, if anything for designing products you'd have a product design degree.

    2) You don't do product design in rendering packages like maya and lightwave, more like Solidworks or if you did n't have the cash Rhino3D.

  37. Re:through my eyes by loserbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who knows, look at her links... the one in her sig is for a high school volleyball team, yet she has a degree in macroscale design.

  38. They have no intent to sue by blorg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I thought this kind of behavior was reserved for companies that could afford to lose customers or that had an existing customer base. What do they wish to gain? Slander is difficult to pin on someone especially new organizations if you're in the public eye.

    They have no intent to sue. They just hoped that by sending a threatening letter they might get HardOCP to take down an article that might scare away the venture capitalists that they want to extract money from.

  39. Now we're in a quandary... by coupland · · Score: 1

    Oh I'm torn, what to do, what to do... "Litigous Bastards" is already taken.

    Oh, and for Infinium... I probably wouldn't have bought your console before, and I definitely won't now but... are you DAFT? I never read the original article but I'm on my way to read it now. What is the technical term for this practise? "Unadvertising"??? Yanno, when you pay good money for BAD publicity for your products? (shakes head...)

    1. Re:Now we're in a quandary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant:
      Oh I'm torn, what to do, what to do... "litigious bastards" is already taken.

  40. ID numbers reveal the scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    she's my friend and I can vouch for her

    Leola (754828)

    Lyssa Watson (754835)

    Amazing how both of you joined right about the same time given your ID numbers.

    Thanks for identifying another troll account!

    1. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by loserbert · · Score: 1

      Ouch!!!!! That hurts... 8^)

    2. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh huh....and there's no possible chance that a troll is masquerading as a "fairly famous geek girl" in order to build karma and troll better? Riiiiiiight.....

    3. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can prove that this new account really belongs to "famous geek girl" Lyssa how, exactly?

    4. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Poster wrote:
      Man, somebody is on the crack today. Googlenews around for Lyssa, she's a fairly famous "geek girl," ...
      Google news only gives the following for "lyssa watson":

      Your search - lyssa watson - did not match any documents
      so much for that theory.
    5. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you guys private investigators in real life?

      I don't know about everyone else, but I am ...

    6. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, a search on Google (not Googlenews) turns up (at sfpoetry.org/other.html):

      LYSSA WATSON is thirteen years old and has dreamed of being published since she was seven years old.

      So, you have crushed the dreams of a 13 year old who has wanted to be published since she is 7. You bastard.

    7. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Yahoo search turns up the same single reference. So much for the "famous geek girl". My question now, is, have we identified a 3rd troll account (the one who said Lyssa Watson is a "famous geek girl"?

    8. Re:ID numbers reveal the scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Girls go to the bathroom at the same time. Why shouldn't they all join Slashdot together? Maybe they heard Slashdot was a great place to pick up guys?

      Nah. I'd think we'd better stick with the troll theory.

  41. Re:How do you know there wasn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another up and coming troll account. Same person. Note their UIDs, how quickly they each registered.

    "females against microsoft" is a nice ploy, too. these are up and coming troll accounts.

  42. PT Barnum School of Publicity by bbsguru · · Score: 2, Interesting
    PT said it best: "Any publicity is good publicity, as long as they spell your name right".

    With that in mind, I hope these bastards at Infernalium.com are blessed with an army of dyslexic sycophantic PR flaks.

    1. Re:PT Barnum School of Publicity by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      PT said it best: "Any publicity is good publicity, as long as they spell your name right".
      With that in mind, I hope these bastards at Infernalium.com are blessed with an army of dyslexic sycophantic PR flaks.

      I did that in response to a Usenet spam; had a go at the guy in my reply and subtlely swapped two letters in the URL quoted from the original article. If anyone was still minded to click on the site after reading the reply, they'd get it wrong.

      I don't think this is exactly a fantastic anti-noise tactic for Usenet though.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  43. hah by Loie · · Score: 5, Funny

    anyone else find it humorous that the lawyers who wrote the threat letter are at www.mofo.com ?

    1. Re:hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mofo is *huge* in IP law.

      Yes, their domain is funny.

    2. Re:hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    3. Re:hah by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      quick google...

      Named after the Penn and Teller fan channel? Seems a bit obscure.

      A motor racing league?

      New York sports team?

      None of those meanings seem particularly funny, and if it aint on the first page it cant be important :-)

    4. Re:hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mofo is short for motherfucker.

      I hope you weren't being serious.

    5. Re:hah by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that's what mofo stands for. Obviously yet more proof that americans can't spell then... it should be mofu if it is an abbreviation; otherwise it would be referring to a woman who works for a dutch aircraft company.

  44. Umm Do they Realize by DarthTeufel · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do they realize that by doing stuff like this they are making an enemy out of thousands of potential buyers? While the NERD army is not as prestigous as the KISS army, we can fight it out with the best of them.

  45. let's blame SCO! by JWG · · Score: 2, Funny
    since there hasnt been an SCO story today, let's find a way to relate this story to SCO.

    we could re-name the title of this story to something like:

    SCO's lawyers take break from hell to perform pro-bono work for Infinium

  46. Take it easy... by jgrumbles · · Score: 1

    They need more money to develop their already outdated by 2 years console.

  47. Re:through my eyes by loserbert · · Score: 1

    It took the public link out of its profile.. here it is

  48. credibility... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all, Bachus is a seasoned pro [...] in an interview with gamesindustry.biz published January 29, 2004, he said, "I plan to be working in this industry, hopefully at Infinium but if not then somewhere else, for a long time, and ultimately all I have is my credibility."

    What, no skill, talent, experience, vision, morality or integrity? That damn journalist must have cut those bits out to save on his word count.

    (though, to be fair - from a slashdot editor, I would have expected : 'All I have is my credibilty, and my credibility').

  49. Scientology connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I have no proof and only speculation here, but don't the actions of the company and the CEO sound like the standard practices of Scientology? The connecetion to Sarasota, which is very near to St. Petersburg, is another interesting coincidence. but again, this is just speculation. Does anyone other there have the time do some investigation?

  50. I think HardOCP should agree to remove the article by inkless1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But I would take it even further, following Robin's strategy.

    Just remove all articles. Inifinium has produced nothing but laughable trash when it comes to PR anyway and I don't think the gaming industry needs any more from blowhard vaporeware merchants. Don't give these guys any soap box, good bad or otherwise, in which to con venture capitol from anyone else. Especially with the clear lack of respect they have for the online community you would think they would want to entice.

    Just make them vanish. I mean jeebus, these were the rocket scientists who couldn't get an online email form to work right - who thinks they can produce a secured broadband game delivery console before Sony and MS swallows up the market?

    They want the "truth" to come out? Fine. Let them put a product on the shelves. Until them, just blackball them from the web.

  51. Pic of the Infinion Phantom BoxCubeStation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Pic of the Infinion Phantom BoxCubeStation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the Panasonic-Q Gamecube+DVD-player hybrid.

      Phantom has yet to submit anything to Sidetalking :(

  52. established customer base by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought this kind of behavior was reserved for companies that could afford to lose customers or that had an existing customer base.

    They already have 25 million units sold, and they're moving more all the time.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  53. Proving everyone right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is hard to imagine what they could ever get out of suing this company. Screw the idea that "this will alienate customers" because you can't have customers of nothing. This action only bolsters everyone's correct opinion that the Phantom does not exist.

    This move does, however, get people talking about the console again. Personally I had forgotten all about it and it seems that Infinuim does not want us to do that. Is there some way to moderate Infinium news down as Troll so that we can filter it out? It does not really matter, I am sure these morons would only create a new accout (company) for the purposes of Trolling the world again.

  54. Re:More info on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for pointing out a link in the article linked to in the writeup, whore.

    this is informative?! i guess it got all the mods hot and bothered that a *female* is against microsoft.

    fucking troll

  55. next up at [H]ardOCP by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    an "Infinium Phantom Console" PC case modding contest. ;-)

    1. Re:next up at [H]ardOCP by Rallion · · Score: 1

      *Points to empty Bawls bottle.*

      Look! It's my Phantom! I added a Bawls bottle!

  56. Infineum? Damn near killed 'um! by Frennzy · · Score: 1

    er...oh nevermind.

  57. What a Momma's Boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timothy: Mom! You weren't supposed to say that you ran the company

    Timmy's Mommy: I'm sorry Timmy, I can't remember everything...

    Timothy: And tell my sister to not give out my phone number or email if someone calls there.

    Timmy's Mommy: Yes dear, just please stop yelling at me.

    Timothy: Remember, those companies are supposed to make my resume appear better and divert attention from my massive and consistent string of fuck ups.

    Timmy's Mommy: Yes dear, just please stop yelling at me.

    Timothy: If I don't find some more investors to rip off, then I will have to sell my 3 M house (now worth only 1.2 M) and come back and live in the basement like all the other slashdot readers. And I'll probably have to touch my sister's junk and sell the videos to make money to pay off the mortgage.

    Timmy's Mommy: Yes dear, just please find more investors...

  58. Two ways to respond. by vitaflo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If Infinium really wanted to shut up HardOCP, they could take one of two actions. They could either file a silly lawsuit, or actually show the console working and playing games to the press.

    Given the fact that they chose the former, I think it's speaks volumes about what sort of product (or in this case lack of one) they have to show, and makes HardOCP's article all the more credible.

    1. Re:Two ways to respond. by CavyDriver · · Score: 1
      or actually show the console working and playing games to the press

      Actually, HardOCP is still is good shape. Infinium would have to prove that HardOCP was wrong at the time they published the article.
      IANAL though, but it's a pretty simple concept.
  59. Product? by KeeperS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shouldn't Infinitum Labs be more concerned about, you know, getting some sort of product out on the market? The fact that they're suing seems to prove that the Phantom is nothing more than vaporware. If you have an actual product that's actually going to be worth buying, suing only pisses your customers off. If Infinitum Labs was really worried about the claims made against them, they should try and disprove that information or at least put an optimistic spin on it.

    So, to Infinitum Labs, I say this: release your console! At the very least, demonstrate that this isn't some ploy to bilk money out of investors. What's that, Infinitum Labs? You say you can't do that?

    1. Re:Product? by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be nitpicky here, but i think it is apropos that you mistakenly called the company infinitum, as in Phantom console release dates "ad infinitum"
      (It's Infinium, btw. If we're going to smear the company, lets get the name right ;)

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    2. Re:Product? by KeeperS · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realized that after I posted. It's annoying how Slashdot doesn't let you edit your posts, isn't it? Anyway, it is kind of funny that I mistakenly called them Infinitum. Freudian slip?

  60. Re:Google Powers, Activate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmm, you know that you posted four links to www.penny-arcade.com, I mean, the main page. Not any particular comic?

    Does this look familiar to you?

    (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!)

  61. Now everyone knows about it by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Before this i'm sure even most of those who read the original Slashdot article forgot or didn't know about what was going on.

    Thanks to their frivilous lawsuit everyone and their dog will know about it. I can't imagine this sort of thing will be good for business.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  62. I have seen this type of scam before!! by nexusone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just think if you can fool a few rich people or companies, you too can live in a 3 million dollar home and not have to do any real work!!!!

    Scam #1: Start a business in a hot area, get a few componies interested in your idea's. Get investers interested in your company, but telling them how companies are dying to buy your new product. Then sale the company before people realies there is no product and it starts fold.

    Scam #2: Tell investers you have a new product idea for a hot market, get them to invest lot's of money. Then pay yourself an outragous salary, until you have used up all the investment. Then say you were a victem of a tough market.

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
    1. Re:I have seen this type of scam before!! by mlh1996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is modded funny, but it's true.

      Scam #1 was actually the MO of one company I worked for. They eventually fired me because I kept barging into the boss's office and demanding that we actually hire some damn programmers.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    2. Re:I have seen this type of scam before!! by TheHawke · · Score: 1

      Mod it up man! This reeks of scam so much that I had to go wash my hands after reading their website, looking at the property assessment, seeing a 1.25 million house go for 100 bucks, this reeks of a slick con man hard at it.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  63. Stupid Moron Powers, Activate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They advertise a fast AMD Athlon XP 3200+ processor on a high speed Intel motherboard. Man, I would have liked that back with my Athlon 1.2 GHz. That VIA chipset sucked, everyone knows Intel makes the best chipsets!

  64. Who are they trying to kid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About Infinium Labs

    Infinium Labs is an industry-leading (to bankruptcy) global entertainment and interactive game company (so globally omnipresent they don't even have an office). Infinium Labs has developed (posted specifications) and is marketing (hijacking investors) its flagship product the Phantom Gaming Service, a leading edge and intuitive game and delivery system that is the performance leader in the interactive entertainment industry (performance may vary). Founded and managed by senior interactive media, entertainment and technology leaders (spoiled rich bastards) with proven industry experience and success (undeniable failure), Infinium Labs markets a robust (non-existant) game system that appeals to a wide audience of interactive gamers with its ease of use quality assurance and robust delivery system (rest assured, it's easy to deliver us your money!)

    Infinium Labs Corporation was formed in October 2002 and is headquartered (P.O. addressable) in Sarasota, Florida.

  65. Re:Troll's gone already! by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    If you look at the troll's only journal entry, they've called it quits already: (cut and pasted for the lazy):
    And just after I began too. Apparently my 'karma' is now 'terrible' and this means I can only post twice daily. This happened because some people believed I was a 'karma whore troll'. I did a bit of googling and found the wikipedia slashdot 'troll' page. While this is all very fascinating, I really have better things to do than participate in a community like this.

    So goodbye and good luck slashdot!

    No mention of the "she's a guy" shit, though. Not a bad mornings' work :-)
  66. using google's power to discredit phantom by jdkane · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Beyond the fight about the article itself, I am most surprised at how Google's power is used to effectively and accruately trace the owner's history. The article in question also makes effective use of the Google cache to point out content at a specific point in time.

    It seems the Phantom gaming company is subject to the power of Google. I'm surprised they haven't sent legal letters asking Google to remove them from cache (maybe that's happened already -- I didn't read all of the related articles associated with the main articles).

    I'm not surprised that Google is powerful, but instead how easy it could be used against somebody. It's a real eye opener, and potentially frightful to any public/coroporate figure.

    Even for non-famous individuals, like most of us, this can be scary. For example, as we go through life some of our values and beliefs change based on the journey. However a repository of what you *were* like and what you *did in the past* might not accurately reflect what you are today. The use of information can sometimes be scary.

    1. Re:using google's power to discredit phantom by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they haven't sent legal letters asking Google to remove them from cache

      You don't need a legal letter to do that. All you have to do is put the magic words in /robots.txt or in a <meta> element, and well-behaved robots such as Googlebot will remove the site on the next crawl.

    2. Re:using google's power to discredit phantom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along those lines, for other cave dwellers - after emerging from one's cave:
      Don't look directly at the sun.
      Definitely, don't look at IA with all the really old blinking text embarassing personal shit on it nor should one use the Alexa Tool Bar

    3. Re:using google's power to discredit phantom by Newspimp · · Score: 1
      However a repository of what you *were* like and what you *did in the past* might not accurately reflect what you are today. The use of information can sometimes be scary.


      What you have beleived and what you have done in life, sometimes in significant ways, contributed to who and what you are today.

      If I go and kill someone, and then start going to church, it doesn't take anything from the fact that I would be a murderer. I may be completely different of a person, but am no less or no more.

      If that makes it difficult for me to obtain work, where a murderer isn't an ideal candidate, then the answer isn't to delete any evidence that I did it. The answer would be to have never done it. If nothing else, then it simply means I must to explain myself and my changes to any future prosepctive employers.

      Same thing with him. The facts, which are exponentially important when an investor is considering investing their money, are simply that. If he didn't want his credibility hurt by his former actions, he shouldn't have taken those actions.
  67. Infinium should hire Derek Smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he's put out some products. I wouldn't call them quite GAMES though. Both suffer from delusions of grandeur and are mocked in the games industry so it seems fitting.

  68. Legal grounds (Or: ROTFLMAO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Threatening action against a news site under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (43(c) of the Lanham Act) is tantamount to putting a leash on a kitchen sponge and calling it a housecat.

    FTDA was intended to protect famous trademarks from being "diluted" through third-party derivative use. Unfortunately for Infinium, they'd have trouble simply proving their mark is "famous" in the legal sense of the term ("famous" for what? Vapor?). Even worse for them, injunctive relief under FTDA now adheres to an "actual harm" standard (Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Inc., U.S., No. 01-1015, AKA "that Victoria's Secret case), which Infinium would be hard pressed to show.

    Finally, of course, their threat is absolutely meaningless because of the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(4)(C):

    The following shall not be actionable under this section: * * * All forms of news reporting and news commentary.
    Oops. How much they pay for that legal representation again?

    -Watchful.Babbler (*Still* no freaking password!)

    1. Re:Legal grounds (Or: ROTFLMAO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a side note, one of the legal threats has to do with HardOCP "attempting to ... associate [Timothy] Roberts with the bankruptcy of Worldcom [sic]".

      According to HardOCP's article, Roberts' resume listed his work in "[s]tructuring creative Wholesale partnerships" for WorldCom.

      Now, I worked for WCOM before it went bust, and its was on the wholesale side of the business that the truly evil work went down -- in particular, the inflation of profits by swapping bandwidth between WCOM and wholesalers and recording them as sales.

      This does not, of course, mean that Roberts was involved in WCOM's demise, any more than I was. But it does suggest that Roberts was proximate to that demise, and HardOCP has an arguable journalistic interest in bringing that up.

      - Watchful.Babbler

    2. Re:Legal grounds (Or: ROTFLMAO) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Oops. How much they pay for that legal representation again?"
      • At least MOFO can't be sued for false advertising ... They tell you right in their name who you're dealing with.
  69. IANAL by Attaturk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I dunno. With a background like that of Tim Roberts and a product named "Phantom", I'm sure I could be forgiven for thinking that perhaps this was the strategy from the start.

    1. Produce hype and raise investment for a product that sounds like, looks like and feels like it's going to be vapourware.

    2. Wait until the hordes of enthusiast web sites start labelling the product vapourware.

    3. Sue the crap out of one of the smaller, juicier targets on the basis that they're having an financial impact on the product's ongoing development.

    4. Rinse, repeat steps 1 and 3 until you've raised so much money you can either a) actually build the product or b) do a runner.

    5. Well, profit. =P

    Maybe I'm just a little jumpy in this SCO-et-al era. I'm not trying to bait but I would genuinely love to hear some /. IANAL's and IAAL's debunk this particular conspiracy theory. :)

    1. Re:IANAL by Cynikal · · Score: 3, Funny

      do you think you really need to ASK for an oppinion from slashdot ANALs?

    2. Re:IANAL by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      do you think you really need to ASK for an oppinion from slashdot ANALs?

      Now that just sounds dirty.

    3. Re:IANAL by Cynikal · · Score: 1

      Thats how it was intended

  70. Quite Right. by RLW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had never heard of this letter the flap was linked here. If the intent was to remove the article in hopes it would not be noticed by more people, they have failed in a big way.

    It's sort of like when the Catholic church say we should boycott a movie. One that many have never heard of until the publicity of the boycott helps to a) make more people aware of the movie and b) pique the interest of those who may wonder, "What's the big fuss, maybe I should go see it to check out the hub-bub."

    Had this letter never been written, then it would not have been linked and I would never have seen it. By Show of hands how many here are seeing this for the first time?

    1. Re:Quite Right. by The_K4 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, but All "Good Catholics" won't go to the movie becasue the church tells them not to, and everyone else is going to hell anyway so the Catholics will just laugh at the poor sinner......

    2. Re:Quite Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Catholic Church" hasn't made official statements about popular entertainment since movies had sound. The ones who do that aren't directly affiliated.

  71. It's a Scam (article text) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behind the Infinium Phantom Console : Many of us are well aware of the buzz surrounding the Phantom gaming console and the promises made by the company developing it. We look past the hype and press releases and take an honest look at who's behind the Phantom and the success of their previous ventures.
    Wednesday, September 17, 2003
    Date
    Miscellaneous
    Categories
    Infinium Labs
    Manufacturers
    Steve Lynch
    Author
    Kyle Bennett
    Editor

    Introduction

    By now, the whole world has heard of Infinium Labs and their infamous Phantom Game Console, but what do we really know about what could be the next big gaming console or the people bringing it to market? At this point, we know little beyond what they've been willing to share. We haven't seen the console outside of a few 3D renderings, we haven't seen the facility where they claim beta units are being built, and we haven't seen the Infinium Labs base of operations.

    So, what do we know? Well, not much at first, so we decided to compile and research all of the publicly available information we could find and see what we could learn about Infinium Labs and their new console. What we discovered was that the CEO of Infinium Labs, Timothy Roberts, has helmed several businesses that have failed or have gone bankrupt in the last six years. A couple of these high profile bankruptcies cost investors in those companies millions and millions of dollars. Mr. Roberts is now the head of a new company, Infinium Labs, and is rounding up money from investors to realize his latest vision. We've read about at least one person who has stated that Infinium Labs has generated at least $25 million in venture capital and has also reported seeing a prototype console in person.

    Let's start by first taking a look at what the Phantom console is actually supposed to be. Below are press release excerpts from Infinium Labs:

    Infinium Labs is an industry-leading global entertainment and interactive game company. Infinium Labs has developed and is marketing its flagship product the Phantom Game Console(TM), a leading edge and intuitive game console and delivery system that is the performance leader in the interactive entertainment industry. Founded and managed by senior interactive media, entertainment and technology leaders with proven industry experience and success, Infinium Labs markets a robust game console that appeals to a wide audience of interactive gamers with its ease of use, quality assurance and robust delivery system. For more information, please visit www.phantom.net or www.infiniumlabs.com. Built By Gamers for Gamers(TM)

    Phantom Game Console(TM)
    If you have a need for blazing fast processor speed, cinematic graphics, and Dolby Digital(TM) Surround Sound, then experience the Phantom Game Console(TM) for a true high performance gaming environment. The Phantom(TM) provides access to more games of every genre than any competing product. Phantom's breath-taking speed, graphic realism and Dolby Digital(TM) 7.1 Surround Sound put it in a class of its own . . . the must-have high performance game console. Experience the new world of Phantom(TM).

    Phantom(TM) is the next-generation game console that supports PC games, games on-demand, game rentals, game demos and seamless upgrades. It is the fastest game console on the market and includes a broad selection of pre-loaded games. Phantom(TM) offers gamers a more exciting and compelling gaming experience than any other game console or PC on the market. Phantom(TM) is an always on broadband device, which allows gamers a wealth of options, from wireless connectivity to massive multiplayer capability . . . to allowing gamers to demo and experience games before purchasing or subscribing.

    Components & Features

    Case Feature Set

    Phantom(TM) Features:
    - State of the art design and technology
    - Pre-loaded games that appeal to wide variety of users and gaming needs
    - Ability to download more games than offered by other game consol

  72. Jiggery-pokery? by karmaflux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can anyone decipher that?

    ...and does anyone else suspect that this whole ordeal might be a front for the REAL BUSINESS?

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1

      A Cafepress shop? Wow... how, uhh... impressive... Is that for real?! If it is, then now I know these Phantom people don't exactly have it together...

    2. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You betcha it's real. It's linked to from www.infiniumlabs.net.

    3. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      "Certain statements included in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements. "

      Ain't that the truth!

      Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    4. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The absolute best is the Phantom calendar, which provides 12 detailed and revealing images of what this company is capable of delivering with their next-gen graphics chips and whatnot.

      http://www.cafeshops.com/ilabs.9676686?zoom=yes# zo om

    5. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by jasoncart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow - I want one of them "Pahntom Wall Clock[s]"

    6. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "arasota, Florida - January 6, 2004 - Infinium Labs, Inc., formerly Global Business Resources, Inc. (OTC BB: GBBR) announced today that on January 5, 2004, (after the closing of the markets), it completed the acquisition of Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, formerly Infinium Labs Corporation. The transaction was completed by the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Infinium Labs, Inc. into Infinium Labs Operating Corporation with Infinium Labs Operating Corporation surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Infinium Labs, Inc."

      Reminds me of "and the first party of that contract will be henceforth be know as the first party of the contract...".

    7. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      the Phantom Gaming Service, a leading edge and intuitive gaming and content delivery system that is the performance leader in the interactive entertainment industry.

      It's easy to be a "performance leader" in a market that has no competition. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is no other "gaming and content delivery system" out there, at least functioning as in Tim Roberts "vision".

      This statement is a load of B.S. Everything that I've read (including roblimo's article, HardOCP's article, Tim and Peter Robert's Home pages, and Penny Arcade) leads me to believe that these guys are complete B.S. artists.

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    8. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      Did you catch the name on that press release?

      James Roberts. Must be another brother. Or perhaps the guys father? Nephew?

      Not vaporware. Right.

    9. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by deprecated · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Jiggery-pokery? by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      It's a pretty standard shell game. I'm not sure what it's called, but I've seen almost exactly that sequence of events when a small group of investors takes over a private company. They create a placeholder corporation (in this case GBBR) which "merges" with the target, takes over its name, and spins off the placeholder to go after the next target. There are probably some very good accounting reasons for all the jiggery-pokery. Or something.

  73. I won't decide on this issue yet by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting to hear what Gabe and Tycho have to say.

  74. Venture capital running dry? by Roached · · Score: 1

    I assume this guy doesn't keep up with the relevant news on sites like HardOCP which is probably why he didn't read the article until recently. Probably he was trying to get a new influx of venture capital and the investers told him what they read on the review sites and to go fly a kite. That might be what set this off.

    1. Re:Venture capital running dry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you nailed it.

  75. I Smell Fraud by 36526542DD · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It really makes me mad when people get away with crap like this. This man defrauds investors over and over and over, and gets away with it in full public view.

    Martha Stewart acts on a tip from her investor and dumps her stock and she'll likely go to prison and lose it all after being dragged through a lengthy federal process.

    This idiot, on the other hand, really defrauds people again and again for millions of dollars, and does so blatantly while bragging about the size of his house (among other things, I'm sure) and walks away scott-free.

    It ain't right.

  76. Re:What a great way to get gamers to buy your prod by ILL+Robinson · · Score: 1

    Really....

    What better way to gain a good rep with the community than to sue a well-known gamer's site.
    Sheesh - just goes to show that they have not one clue about the market they're looking to sell to.

    May not be the final nail in the coffin, but the nails are definitely in place.

  77. Re:Yup, looks like a troll account. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y'all need to get a life kids. Bullshit posts? Fake accounts? ... So why don't you all admit that you have nothing better to do than to bitch that someone is pretending to be a girl?

    I'm no slashbot and am a big fan of crapflooding, but this level of admission is just pathetic. You loser boys living in front of your computers are just as lame as those bitching about fake accounts. Some of you idiots even pay this site just to karmawhore. So to both the slashbots and the troll wannabes, both y'all just get your ass outside and enjoy the world. There's more to life than Slashdot.

  78. Remove everything by john82 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only thing that [REDACTED] gets out of this is publicity. Over and over they have proved to have absolutely nothing: no offices, no capital, no product, no sense.

    I would suggest that we cease and desist with ANY discussion of non-existant companies suing over non-existant damage arising out of non-existant product. Therefore HardOCP, Slashdot, et al should simply remove all references to [REDACTED] and their alleged console the [REDACTED].

    It's the only way to ensure that such sites aren't the victims of spurious legal action. Else they'd be accessories to fraud for perpetuating information about things that don't exist.

  79. Random amusing guesses by vidstudent · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. The newly built outhouse...why flush money down the drain when you can bury it under your feces?
    2. A pretty new GameCube to compare his vaporware to.
    3. A Microsoft Windows license, granted in return for Infinium's DRM work.
    4. The collection of burnt-out CPU's he's kept over the years...he should read HardOCP sometime.
    5. The desktop calendar with enough months to display the Phantom's actual ship date.
    --

    Nicholas Eckert
    vidstudent

  80. Immortality by way of a Karma-Chaser by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    The original article can be preserved forever in the /. archives by the first karma-chaser to post it here after HardOCP is /.'ed. Then let's see them try to remove that.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  81. 1.25 mil??? by ILL+Robinson · · Score: 1

    ...looks to me like Infinium is trying to locate their next round of funding.

  82. Infinium is actually really cool! Check it out! by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone trashing Infinium here has not bothered to try out Infiniums offerings themselves. If you lazy asses would go to their web site you'd see that they have produced many great things already, including a really cool logo, an Acrobat PDF file with cool graphics embedded in it, and a kick-ass schweeet streaming video file that has techno beats, flashy words and graphics flying all over the screen, I was was like "Whoa! That logo is cool!" I want to upgrade my connection to T3 so I can download the bigger versions of the promotional versions, and here them in Dolby Surround!

    The problem with most lame-ass gamers these days is everyone expects to go to the store and buy a plastic box and you bring it home and plug it in and "play with it", as if pushing buttons and controllling things on the screen really matters. Well that's old thinking. Now days we don't have to hold a gaming system in our hands to appreciate it. We can just download a promotional video clips (that are all free by the way, why pay for games when promotional videos are free?) and it shows you what the system would look like, that is if you wanted a plastic box taking space in your home, but we don't have to actually hold it and play it, do we? No!

    Infinium is taking the next bold step into "non-interactive promotional gaming" and all of you are just screwing around wasting money on your Pac-Man ancient history non-promotional I-have-to-hold-it-in-my-hands gaming systems. Losers! All of you! I'm never reading Slashdot again, at least not until I come back to work on Monday, I swear, all weekend no Slashdot!

    1. Re:Infinium is actually really cool! Check it out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot exists on weekends?

    2. Re:Infinium is actually really cool! Check it out! by randomErr · · Score: 1

      Give us an f*@king demo, not just some rendered shoot of what it might look like and some specs of what it might do. Don't bitch unless your bitchin' where the damn system.

      You could build a system by the time it comes out.

      Anyone trashing Infinium here has not bothered to try out Infiniums offerings themselves. If you lazy asses would go to their web site you'd see that they have produced many great things already, including a really cool logo, an Acrobat PDF file with cool graphics embedded in it, and a kick-ass schweeet streaming video file that has techno beats, flashy words and graphics flying all over the screen, I was was like "Whoa! That logo is cool!" I want to upgrade my connection to T3 so I can download the bigger versions of the promotional versions, and here them in Dolby Surround!

      The problem with most lame-ass gamers these days is everyone expects to go to the store and buy a plastic box and you bring it home and plug it in and "play with it", as if pushing buttons and controllling things on the screen really matters. Well that's old thinking. Now days we don't have to hold a gaming system in our hands to appreciate it. We can just download a promotional video clips (that are all free by the way, why pay for games when promotional videos are free?) and it shows you what the system would look like, that is if you wanted a plastic box taking space in your home, but we don't have to actually hold it and play it, do we? No!

      Infinium is taking the next bold step into "non-interactive promotional gaming" and all of you are just screwing around wasting money on your Pac-Man ancient history non-promotional I-have-to-hold-it-in-my-hands gaming systems. Losers! All of you! I'm never reading Slashdot again, at least not until I come back to work on Monday, I swear, all weekend no Slashdot!

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  83. nice piece of investigative journalism by Semi-Lagrange · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AFAIK HardOCP's article is a great little example of investigative journalism that dares to go a little deeper under the surface. This is pretty atypical given your average pseudo-tech articles with which we're being bombarded these days. Can you say Tom's? I knew you could. They just won themselves a regular reader. (ok, maybe for this week)

    --
    No hay banda
  84. Phantom exists and it is .... by Hadji+Baba · · Score: 1

    phan-tom (fan'tuhm) n.
    1. an apparition or specter (The company)
    2. an appearance or illusion without material substance, as a dream image, mirage, or optical illusion. (The device)
    3. a person or thing of merely illusory power, status, efficacy, etc (Timothy Roberts!)

    Thanks to Random House Webster's Dictionary for clueing me in.

  85. Hah! They call *that* a threat??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *This* is a *real* threat:

    "It must be apparent that the combined strength of all your terrestrial
    forces is but a ridiculous nothing that I couldsweep away, with simply
    a twist of a dial, for all time. A single one of my energy cannons
    would suffice to change any of your larger continents into a boiling
    sea of lava within a fraction of a second. With this ship alone, I
    could destroy your entire solar system. Just remember this. Call me,
    please, before it is too late."

    -- Thora of the House of Zoltral

    (from Perry Rhodan #1: Enterprise Stardust by K.H. Scheer)

  86. It's coming: MARCH 31st 2004 !! by potus98 · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to Phantom.net, the "creed comes to life March 31st 2004 at our Phantom online store where customers can customize their own Phantom Gaming Service to meet their individual needs." They go on to refer to March 31st 2004 as the "e-commerce launch" ROTFLMAO!!!!

    There website reads like a vaporware/dot.bomb parody. Oh PLEEEASE let me submit my credit card information to the "Phantom Online Store"!


    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    1. Re:It's coming: MARCH 31st 2004 !! by potus98 · · Score: 1

      Wow! I think this is like my first post to get modded up. This is soooo cool. Thanks g[uys|als]!

      'Course, now I'll probably get lamed down for this follow-up. Oh well... :-(

      --
      This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  87. cock pistol, aim at foot, fire...ouch! by rbird76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good idea Infinium! Now everybody knows about the article you didn't want them to see. Intimidating people into not revealing inconvenient facts only works if you're big enough and ruthless enough to scare the people who have the information into submission. Since you aren't big enough to do that, people are willing to stand up against you - and the information you wanted to keep away from the world is spread about for all to see.

    Your response to the article should tell your prospective investors that you're not smart enough to actually deserve their money or to use it wisely.

    1. Re:cock pistol, aim at foot, fire...ouch! by Milican · · Score: 1

      Yep, I would not have seen this article if it were not for the threatening letter. My opinion of Infinium Labs is that it is a sham. I think the folks at HardOCP did everyone a great service by doing the due dillegence that any investor should do before investing in a company. To be honest I thought the company was a sham before seeing the HardOCP page. Putting a 3GHz processor in a consumer console just isn't going to be profitable at this time because no one is going to pay the amount of money required to purchase the console and Phantom cannot afford to sell at a loss.

      JOhn

  88. (as stated on my personal site) by PrimeWaveZ · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Infinium Labs will partner with BuyMusic.com to provide music services on the Phantom console. Their CEOs seem like they'd get along very well, and have about the same success rate in business ventures. Only time will tell.

  89. MOD PARENT UP +5 PERCEPTIVE, REALISTIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Make this site a tool, don't let it make you a tool.

  90. mofo.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their attornies' website is http://www.mofo.com ?

    Now *that's* truth in advertising.

  91. The "Spinal Tap" of Tech Manufacturing. ROFLMAO!! by LazloToth · · Score: 1



    The HardOCP article is beautifully done, as are the follow-ups. You gotta love it - - as long as you're not an investor. But if you're looking for a REAL gaming console, email me for the .pdf files. I have dozens of both electronic and physical addresses, so you can be sure that I, personally, will read your comment eventually. I do NOT accept PayPal. Thank you.

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  92. Re:What a great way to get gamers to buy your prod by kfg · · Score: 1

    Frankly I think it's a great idea. Imagine, if you will hoards of gamers storming the stores and buying these things two and three at a time. All the high end model too. $500+$120=$620 apiece for a box of nice parts, all sold by Infinium at a loss.

    And since it's really just a standard PC done up in a doofey box getting Linux to run on it will be a piece of cake. I predict about 1 hour from first sale to first running system.

    Try imagining a beowolf cluster of these things. No, really imagine a beowolf cluster of these things.

    How about a home LAN of nVidia 3D accelerated 3ghz P4s at $420 apiece?

    Yep, I think every gamer should support HardOCP in this matter by purchasing as many Phantom's as they can lay their hands on.

    Which brings us right back to the joke embedded in the products name.

    KFG

  93. Re:I think HardOCP should agree to remove the arti by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I don't think would set a good precident for H to just take them down on an editorial at the first sign of legal trouble because that shows how easily H buckles to pressure, attracting other maggots to pressure them. To me, that would undermine H's credibility. If H didn't put up that page then much of the gaming world might not have known about how far down the con game goes.

    And no, I don't think Infinium has jack for credibility either.

  94. On the other end by use_compress · · Score: 1

    Supremum labs has released everything they promised plus or minus epsilon.

  95. Re:Google Powers, Activate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, he is aware of that. He is not here for the post, he is here for the google crawler, as his subject line indicates. He wants google to find the link between terms like "Worst" and "Homosexual" and Penny Arcade. Unfortunately, he is not a particularly skilled google bomber, and apparently does not realize that he is meanwhile increasing the value of significantly more realistic search terms like "Comic" to Penny Arcade.

    I grant "google bombing n00b" awards to both of you. Congratulations.

  96. Re:I think HardOCP should agree to remove the arti by inkless1 · · Score: 1

    Blackballing is hardly the same as the capitulating to the demands.

    If H didn't put up that article, and nobody else put up Infinium articles, many people would either not know Infinium exists or forget about them. That would make for a happier world, and make it harder for Inifinium to put their con on.

    Not saying they shouldn't have done it in the first place - but at this point, let's just remove them from the memepool and go about our lives.

  97. Kevin Bachus... by scot4875 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So was this Kevin Bachus' "first move" after joining up with Infinium Labs? I don't recall hearing any other action from him since leaving Microsoft.

    So, after a couple (few? I forget exactly when he defected) months with the team, the best thing he can come up with to add credibility (wasn't that one of the things he was touted to do?) to the Phantom is to sue a news site for libel and diluting their trademark?

    What exactly was he in charge of on the DirectX team, anyway? The patent portfolio?

    Or, giving him the benefit of the doubt, maybe calling the phone-in press conference was just the first task Mr. Roberts assigned him to?

    It just makes me feel so warm and fuzzy inside when I see all these video game industry "leaders" from Microsoft (Seamus "I want to invent another layer of middle-man!" Blackley in particular) leave, only to be shown for the useless, uninspired jackasses that they are. It's a little harder to survive when they don't have a near limitless supply of cash, eh?

    --Jeremy

    --
    Jesus was a liberal
    1. Re:Kevin Bachus... by gassendi · · Score: 1

      So was this Kevin Bachus' "first move" after joining up with Infinium Labs?

      No. He set up Capital Entertainment Group in I think 2001. He was also with Wild Tangent but seems to have left.

      So not much of a success record for him then.

  98. Just call him what he is a conman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally caught up to Roberts since there were some people that actually checked on his "credentials".

  99. Freedom of speech applies only to government. by autophile · · Score: 1
    I am curious, since I take the idea of freedom of speech quite seriously

    Did you know that the prohibition against restriction of freedom of speech applies only to the government?

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:Freedom of speech applies only to government. by Speare · · Score: 2, Informative

      The plaintiff asks the Court to impose penalties.

      The Courts impose penalties by interpreting the Law.

      The Courts cannot stifle free speech any more than, paraphrasing, the Congress who shall pass no Laws to infringe against the freedom of speech or press. Now if some journalist was squelched by their boss, or by the Editor of some other newspaper, then you're right-- the First Amendment doesn't cover that. We're not talking about corporations controlling the avenues of speech on their own, we're talking about corporations controlling the avenues of speech, with the force of Law.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Freedom of speech applies only to government. by EriDay · · Score: 3, Informative

      IANAL, but I believe you have misinterpreted the article you cite. Those people were fired, not something that requires due process in a court of law.

      Both slander and libel require due process in a court of law, and are statutory, not constitutional, meaning that congress has enacted a law. The 1st amendment starts with "congress shall enact no law". If you and I have a business relationship (employment), you are free to cancel it for what I might say or write. If you want to force me to take back my words, you're going to have to take me to court where we'll we get into that constitutional laws trump statutory laws thing.

  100. I'm eagerly awaiting the movie... by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Funny

    MoFo: The Phantom Menace

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  101. Re:I think HardOCP should agree to remove the arti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep in mind they not only want the article removed, they also want a retraction printed. While they might get the lawyers to agree to part of the demands, it doesn't seem likely in this case. And, printing a retraction would harm HardOCP's credibility to it's readers.

  102. Here's what really bothers me by kevx45 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With all the commenting of vaporware, censorship, and after reading the article, here's what bothers me. 1) This sounds like Fraud. Really, really, really bad fraud. I don't think I would buy this game console for that reason. But, I have other reasons to. 2) Because the "Phantom" console uses a custom version of the Windows XPe kernel (the hell is XPe by the way... I've never heard of it.) Even though Microsoft has let this sort of thing happen before, I don't think they'd let it go on to for too long. Especially with X-Box 2, etc. I'd think that Microsoft and Sony would do something like the streaming game content themselves, along with adding other stuff that could be useful. 3) These people have no idea about console design apprarently. Aren't the rules of console design supposed to be "standardization" of product, so that EVERY game you design can work on EVERY console you PRODUCE! What's with this "configure your own system" crap? What if a new game comes out that you can only play on the highest end configuration and you have the bottom of the barrel. Yeah, that's not good. I just don't trust this period. It's definitely not a "fair cop guv."

    --
    "Now there's a look in your eyes, like black holes in the sky"-Pink Floyd
    1. Re:Here's what really bothers me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shine on, you crazy diamond you

  103. Lawyers with a sense of humour??? by fair_n_hite_451 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who knew

    www.mofo.com as their web site address?

    What will those whacky legal professionals come up with next?

    --
    Reason why there is hope for the future generation #364:
    "I wish my grass was emo so it could cut itself."
  104. My Phantom Console is on order !!! by DangerSteel · · Score: 4, Funny

    And yes, it was expensive, but worth it. Price is no object so I ordered the "top of the line" model complete with a Bitboys video card and I even get a certificate to take to the store and pick up my copy of Duke Nukem Forever!! I WIN !

  105. does anyone else... by ophix · · Score: 1

    does anyone else find it hard to take seriously a letter from a law firm whose second level domain is "mofo" ?

  106. Ques from RIAA? by archaic0 · · Score: 1

    They must be getting their ques from RIAA... if at first you make bogus claims and the public doesn't bow to you, then sue!

    RIAA did it with their sales numbers, and Infinium is doing it with their product as a whole. They're lucky anyone as taken notice of them for this long at all.

    If they had any forthought at all, they would have been raking in the cash from Amazon ads on their site and maybe actually got 25 Mil to start on something. ...oo, oo, or what if they set up a Cafe Express shop with Phantom gear! That would be sweet!!

    --
    [ http://www.dvigroup.net/self ] ...where I keep my pennies and nickels...
  107. Infinitum labs linky in news post is wrong by Mixel · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's at infiniumlabs.net, not infiniumlabs.com

    Wouldnt want them to miss out on their own (3rd?) slashdotting...

  108. Company Funding by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Using the Infinium labs legal team to fight a case of lible against an individual merely makes him look more guilty(of being incompetent in this case).

    Learn from the ants not the grasshopper.

    As far as the Phantom goes it sounds like the kind of thing I would be interested in depending on how modular and cheap they are able to keep it. Don't let the head of the company being a complete ass from letting you enjoy what could potentially be a quality product.

    From the above you can tell I am optomistic about the chances of the product launching, it's more like I believe it could launch. There really wouldn't be any work involved in creating the system they are talking about, grab some off the shelf components, add cheap modular OS, add win emulator (WineX?) Make deal with one of the billions of PC game designers to publish some games. And now this fellow has a bee in his bonnet maybe he'll get off his ass and do it. Or at least build an office :)

  109. Re:Been rejected a lot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you two retarded?

  110. If its a valid legal tactic.... why not for radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off is this a valid legal tactic, suing someone because their perceptions might not gel with your idea or might endanger your effort?

    If it is, can the govt. (local or fed) sue, lets say 'certain' radio talk show hosts who publicize and rabidly follow information they cannot verify? For eg in OH (could be another mid-west state) conservative talk show hosts just went on and on and on about .5 billion ds that the state supposedly had, to defeat a tax raise. Of course the state didnt have it and the bill was defeated, in no small part due to a certain syndicated show. If there is a similar situation can the govt. legally go after the host or does that fall under free speech?

  111. Pretty much confirms it was a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Every time I see this reaction I just assume the reporting was correct, its a standard reaction from certain sorts of scam artist. Do anything that props up the lie at the core of the scam. The worst possible action to take if Phantom is real.

    Just like SCO they need publicity and they don't care what sort it is, as long as a few more potential 'investors' get to hear about the company.

    Does Phantom exist? It doesn't really matter, there's no difference between vapourware and a real product that never ships. All I can say with certainty is no-one in the industry actually seems to care so far.

  112. hmm, phantom doesn't sound so real now... by rwrife · · Score: 1

    After reading the article they almost have me convinced that the Phantom is not real and this guy is just trying to steal investors' money. If I were investor I'd pull out now.

  113. Just about says it all by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 3, Funny

    Infinium's law firm is called MoFo. That just about sums everything up nicely.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  114. Mofo? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    According to "Web Pages That Suck" (old book), the owners of the domain (at least at that time) knew exactly what "mofo" meant and were proud of it.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  115. I figured out the real business plan... by Inebrius · · Score: 1

    They are working a deal with hollywood for a movie, "Boiler Room 2: Back in Business".

    This is all pre-movie publicity. And if they get Vin Diesel to star in it:

    Profit!

    (Did anybody else think of Boiler Room while reading the Hard OCP articles?)

  116. Boycott Phantom! by tbond_trader · · Score: 1

    So they want to surpress free speech in the gaming community? I saay boycott this piece of shit when it comes out to send them a message, that is IF it ever comes out.

    1. Re:Boycott Phantom! by rwrife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hmm, how exactly do we boycott something that does not exist?

  117. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Savvis the same Savvis in Herndon, Virginia? The same one using an unsecured wireless router that's easily detectable from anywhere even close to the headquarters, including the Dulles Toll Road? :)

  118. Tim Roberts should be #1 at f*ckedcompany.com by rwrife · · Score: 1

    Tim Roberts should have his on dedicated section on f*ckedcompany.com. Actually, he shouldn't be listed, he's doing ok.....his investors should be listed they're the ones being f*cked.

  119. I smell another lawyer letter by parawing742 · · Score: 1

    Now the next step will be to at DDoS to Slashdot's crimes against their company.

  120. If Hype is dying out... by aepervius · · Score: 1

    ...then send threat letter to somebody to raise again awarness of your company.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:If Hype is dying out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But hype is dead. They can't back up anything they say.

  121. Okay, I give up by stwrtpj · · Score: 5, Funny

    I give up. I can't tell the litigious bastards without a scorecard anymore.

    Okay, someone clue me in. Which litigious bastards are we supposed to be angry at now?

    These litigious bastards ...
    these other litigious bastards...
    now these litigious bastards ...
    or perhaps (and oldie but a goodie) these litigious bastards

    Man, that's going to be an awful lot of HREFs to compile in my posts to talk about anybody on Slashdot anymore.

    --
    Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    1. Re:Okay, I give up by SB5 · · Score: 1

      I really like that... You should turn that into your .sig

      litigious bastards is the reason we have HOT!!! on our coffee cups and the reason why humans don't evolve anymore. You can't evolve if you don't cull the weak!

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  122. MoFo an investor? by littlej · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone else find it a bit funny/wierd/strange (whatever) that MoFo is listed on the Phantom's web site as an investor? I don't know about you, but how many law firms do you know of invest in gaming consoles?

    Also why is it that there are two legal counsils? One in California (MoFo), and one in Florida (IcardMerril)? Futhermore why would two different law firms haw use pretty much the exact threatening letter? Did they get it from the same book/website/Matlock episode?

    I'm in Canada and I can tell it doesn't smell right from way up here!

    1. Re:MoFo an investor? by littlej · · Score: 1

      I also forgot to mention that the forums on the Phantom website were dead. DAMN, and I was hoping to join thier online community...

  123. Catholicism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fun being Catholic!

    Shouldn't you be doing seventy nine Hail Marys for getting an erection when you showered this morning?

  124. IAAL - Here's the legal standard for libel... by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...by a journalist. It's the doctrine of "actual malice" enunciated by the court in the case "New York Times vs. Sullivan". Essentially, the journalist has to have actually lied or acted with a deliberate disregard for the truth in publishing the defamatory story. Unless Roberts can successfully argue that HardOCP isn't a media outlet protected under Sullivan, I doubt that he will prevail in a libel lawsuit.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  125. Did anyone else notice the resume?? by murfygirl · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Who puts this on their resume, unless they are just trying to stream a line of BS.
    Quickbooks, Quicken, CuteFTP, WINRAR, WINACE, WINZIP, Windows Media Player, Real Player, Roxio Easy CD Creator, all internet browsers and most others.
    I removed some of the stuff that was acceptable on a resume, but who asks if you can use Winzip or WMP. That's like asking if you can use the microwave.
  126. One thing to say: by MathFox · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It smells like a SCO to me!

    --
    extern warranty;
    main()
    {
    (void)warranty;
    }
  127. Shuckster and Jiver by bitbucket911 · · Score: 0

    Did you guys happen to notice that this blowhard's house was "sold" to him for a mere $100? Someone *gave* him this house.

    http://www.sarasotaproperty.net/scpa_transfers.a sp ?PropID=0008-15-0002

  128. Re:I think HardOCP should agree to remove the arti by monkease · · Score: 0

    well, being a first-time visitor to HardOCP today, i must say that they're benefiting from all this hullabaloo as well.

    of course, we all hate it when people do things for attention, don't we?

    i think i win the cynicism prize.

  129. The "I" in RIAA is for Infinium by superultra · · Score: 1

    Who would have thunk the RIAA and their methods would be so prolific eh? Maybe this suing your customer base thing really works! Infinium is just jumping on the bandwagon next to Blizzard and Verant.

  130. Isn't that the marketer's dream? by _LMark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's no such thing as bad publicity."

    I kind of see it like spam. Most of the people who read about this will be pissed off, but a few will be intrigued and preorder a console or invest in it as a long shot. With the exposure they're getting, they're going to "accidentally" reach at least a few receptive minds.
    Also, on the offhand that they actually put together a product in some form, no matter how poor it is, people will now have heard of it...

    (For the record, I think it's bogus and am apalled at their attempts to further pervert the legal system for financial gain.)

    --
    'the Internet is right.'
  131. stock info by mabu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Links to the company's SEC filings are here. Pretty illuminating.

    1. Re:stock info by BiOFH · · Score: 1

      Aw, dang... I saw this: :: Changes in Control of Registrant, Acquisition or Disposition of Ass::

      and thought for a second they meant Tim Roberts. Turns out it's just "assets" with the "ets" cut off, not Roberts.

      --
      - I am made of meat.
  132. Re:What a great way to get gamers to buy your prod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 Hour?

    Slap a CD drive in the bitch, and boot up Knoppix. What? 15 minutes? 30-45 including the trip home from Best Buy?

    Yarrrr

  133. $1,250,699? by qrash · · Score: 0

    Well if it was $1,250,699 I would start to get a bit suspicious...

    --
    you may find the Higgs in this signature.
  134. Re:What a great way to get gamers to buy your prod by kfg · · Score: 1

    Yep, the drive home from Best Buy was included in my time estimate. However, I was considering the issue a full install on the HD.

    KFG

  135. I guess they don't have anything to say... by forgeeks · · Score: 0

    http://www.mofo.com/about/pressroom.cfm

    Error Occurred While Processing Request
    Error Diagnostic Information
    ODBC Error Code = S1000 (General error)

    [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Could not use '(unknown)'; file already in use.

    Hint: The cause of this error is usually that you have opened your database in its native environment using exclusive mode. This is a particular problem for Microsoft Access because the default open mode for all databases (unless you specify otherwise) is exclusive. You can (and should) override this behavior in Access using the Multiuser/ODBC section of the Options dialog.

    Another possible cause is that you have set up your ODBC data source to be opened in exclusive mode. Unless you only want one user at a time to access your database you should never set ODBC data sources to be opened in exclusive mode.

    SQL = "SELECT Distinct m.MediaID, m.Title, m.Author, m.DateSpec FROM tblMedia m, tblMedia2Type t WHERE m.active=on AND t.Rel_M2T_MediaTypeID=1 AND t.Rel_M2T_MediaID=m.MediaID ORDER BY m.DateSpec DESC"

    Data Source = "MOFO"

    The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of (CFQUERY), occupying document position (2:1) to (2:55) in the template file D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\sights\Mofo\about\pressroom.cfm .

    Date/Time: 02/20/04 13:05:31
    Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
    Remote Address: 24.210.187.160
    HTTP Referer: http://www.mofo.com/

    --
    -- Powered By Linux
  136. This is indeed my first time as well by ePINOY · · Score: 1

    I haven't followed too much onto the story of Infinium labs since their game console broke out into the news. It seems that HardOCP did a pretty detailed job in trying to figure out what Infinium Labs is all about. And yes, this is the first time I've seen the article at HardOCP. Sucks for Infinium Labs.

    --
    suteki!
  137. Whew by rpillala · · Score: 1

    When I saw the title I thought Infinium was threatening to launch a gaming news site.

    At least it's just pointless legal gestures.

    Ravi

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  138. SCO and Infineum! by euxneks · · Score: 1

    The SCO business plan is not a plan for success!

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  139. I now understand vaporware by hambonewilkins · · Score: 2, Funny
    I originally thought it was called vaporware because the product didn't actually exist. Now I realize it's called vaporware because the company is sniffing fumes. Lots and lots of fumes.

    The article is a really good read, btw. What is wrong with this firm? No, wait, don't answer that.

    --

    God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
  140. Oh, they fully understand the slang meaning. by devphil · · Score: 1


    They didn't when they first derived the name, but they learned quickly. And trust me, they think it's hilarious. They're not a fly-by-night shop, either; they've earned the respect of their peers and their customers.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  141. It's because they are selling stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From filings with the SEC:

    THIS STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT is made as of the 22nd day of January, 2004, by and between Infinium Labs, Inc. (the "Company"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal offices at 2033 Main Street, Suite 309, Sarasota, Florida 34237, and SBI Brightline VI, LLC, a California limited liability company with its principal offices at 2361 Campus Drive, Suite 210, Newport Beach, California 92612 (the "Purchaser").

    On January 22, 2004, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with each of SBI Brightline VI, LLC and Infinium Investment Partners, LLC (each, a "Purchaser") obligating each Purchaser to purchase, upon the Company's election, up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $7.5 million (representing an aggregate purchase price for both Purchasers of $15.0 million). Each agreement requires that the Company register the shares under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), for resale by the applicable Purchaser, and each Purchaser's obligation to purchase the shares is contingent on the shares being so registered. After the shares are registered, the Company may elect to sell the shares to the Purchasers in two tranches that must be sold in the following order:

    Number of Purchase Price
    Shares Per Share
    500,000 $7.00
    500,000 $8.00

  142. Sycophantism by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I once had a sig that read "It's easier to listen to a sycophant, than a critic", and, after reading the above I was reminded of a criminology book I once read (apologies for not being able to remember the title) that posited the theory of "right-brain thinking" as one of the principle sources of criminality in man. In right-brain theory (if it can be called a theory), individuals learn from early childhood that satisfying the ego comes first, above all else . This leads to a rigid adherence to a "me first" attitude in every aspect of life. In essence, right-brainers mature with little to no self restraint, living every day in a constant state of "gimme now!!!" possessiveness. Anyone that tries to "oppress" the selfish behavior is automatically perceived as the "enemy", while those that encourage it are blessed as companions in arms.

    Reading about this Infinium nonsense, and thinking over what you wrote, made me wonder: could capitalism will prove to be the greatest curse that mankind ever brought on itself? Could we be creating generations of right-brainers, all feeding one another's egos for the sole purpose of eliminating all competition?

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    1. Re:Sycophantism by Nic-o-demus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could we be creating generations... all feeding one another's egos for the sole purpose of eliminating all competition?

      I would say that capitalism in its most raw form did exactly that. Hence we had (and some countries still have) problems with child labor, destructive monopolies (ahem), etc. etc. The thing is, when groups of right-brainers as you call them get too large, even capitalism spits them out. All the advances we've made in capitalism, from child-labor laws to employee-stock ownership plans, to new SEC oversight and laws that make Enron-type things not happen, are all the public reacting and plugging up another hole that greed exploited. It's comforting to know that capitalism + democracy patches those holes up, and while it will never eliminate greed, it does keep things in equilibrium more or less.

      But as for the individual that suffers from it... That's the travesty.

      Slashdot's reaction to this guy is a perfect example how society tolerates that right-braindness to a degree, but once they feel someone has crossed a line, it's a steep, slippery slope, and their 'friends' don't tend to stick with them, even if they're involved in the fall.

  143. Good on 'em by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Ripping of venture investors is like get rich quick schemes - the people getting ripped off have let their greed overtake their common sense & thus deserved to be ripped off. IE it's karma

  144. Humbug by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    In regards anyone with a western middle class back grounds (or better), yes being rich won't necessarily make one happy, but in regards anyone who's lived in grinding 3rd world poverty for any sort of length of time, wealth will definitly make one happy.

    One's perspective all come's down to where one is coming from.

    People of western middle class backgrounds have no idea what the insecurity of grounding 3rd world poverty is like. Just imagine what it would be like knowing that if one can't manage to get a days work tomorrow doing 15 hours manual labour in tropical heat, then one will have no money to feed one's self & one's children. Then just imagine the security that one would fill with sudden wealth, when one has had to live like that all one's life.

    The only one's in the west that can really comprehend the insecurity of wondering where one's next meal is coming from, are Junkies who are willing to beg, borrow or steal to get their next shot (otherwise they'll be too sick to function)

    Really there's no one happier than a 3rd world peasent that's all of a sudden wealthy

  145. Logboat Key - home to rich people by MREBoy · · Score: 1

    Ok, one of the links provided by the NewsForge story indicates that Mr. Roberts lives and/or owns property on Longboat Key. Well, I live in Sarasota, which is right next to LBK (as the locals call it).

    That island is so saturated with rich people, its scary. I got bored one night and checked out LBK via census.gov. Less than 20k full time residents, 97% white, 50-60% over 65 years old, and the island has a bigger taxable value than the city of Bradenton, which has over 51k people.

    (And for a good laugh, hit www.longboatobserver.com and search for "Cops Corner". You too can see what the people on LBK call the police for.. "June 14 2002 4:49 p.m. -- 3400 block Bayou Sound. Property lost. Subject is missing hearing aid worth $5,300.")

    And if anyone wants 'em, I could be taking pictures of this guys house in less than 20 minutes :)

    MRE

    ___

    --
    http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL, USA
  146. Hudsucker by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    Hey check out my invention.
    What is it?
    You know, for kids.

    Oh wait, that was Tim Robbins, not Roberts

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  147. [H]ardocp Not a Gaming news site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.hardocp.com

  148. Tiny, unimportant answer by Babbster · · Score: 1

    The "e" in Windows XPe stands for "embedded."

    1. Re:Tiny, unimportant answer by kevx45 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Ewwww... I just realized something: Windows XP Embedded. BTW: I know this is OT, but we've come across some virus problems here at my dorm/Auburn, AL area that seem to delete the TCP/IP protocol. Anyone know anything about that. Seems to affect Windows XP Home and Win 98. Anyhow, I dunno, just thought I would mention it. Kev

      --
      "Now there's a look in your eyes, like black holes in the sky"-Pink Floyd
  149. Content rating, zero by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 1

    I like the phantom flash site for broadband, I'll givem that, atleast it actually exists..

  150. "High-Octane Gaming System" (runs on gas!) by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Industry Leader, leading gaming system, performance leader in the interactive industry...

    Isn't this in the U.S., where you can sue people for harrasment because their wearing to bright colors?
    How come this plain and utter nuissance of a company even still exists?
    Isn't their any law preventing a company from spreading bullshit or is it all ok under that 1st amendment thing?

    We've got free speach in germany too. But if you go on bullshitting the public on that level over here, you're bound to recieve some major legal ass-chewing from the Boersenaufsicht (german SEC) or some court. Just like SCO Germany. They we're hushed within a few months time last year. Shut up, proove your public statements on pay a large fine.
    Is it that hard to establish an exempt ruling that does the same in the US?
    I mean, coffee spillers can sue MCs for large sums, so where is the problem?

    In this area I find the US law system a tad unbalanced, don't your think so too?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  151. Re:Been rejected a lot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Two"?

  152. Re:PARENT=TROLL by ashot · · Score: 1

    why offtopic? he is a troll, just trying to help =/

    --
    -ashot
  153. Has anyone noticed by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    In the article that has Infinium all pissed, there is a quoted press release with the slogan "Built By Gamers For Gamers (tm)"

    Am I mistaken, or is that slogan already taken and trademarked by Interplay?

  154. Standard Press Release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sarasota, Florida [city of origin] - January 6, 2004 [date] - Infinium Labs, Inc. [company name], formerly Global Business Resources, Inc. [their previous name] (OTC BB: GBBR) announced today that on January 5, 2004, (after the closing of the markets), it completed the acquisition of Infinium Labs Operating Corporation, [they are saying they bought this corporation] formerly Infinium Labs Corporation [the corporation's former name]. The transaction was completed by the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Infinium Labs, Inc. into Infinium Labs Operating Corporation with Infinium Labs Operating Corporation surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary of Infinium Labs, Inc. [that corporation is now a subsidiary of them.]

    As a result of the acquisition, Infinium Labs acquired the Phantom Game Service. [now they have the Phantom Game Service] The Phantom Game Service is a next-generation gaming system that supports games on-demand, game rentals, game demos, seamless upgrades and patch management. At launch, the Phantom(TM) is expected to be the fastest, most powerful gaming system on the market and will include a broad selection of pre-loaded games, on-demand games and game rentals.[described]

    The Phantom Gaming Service is an always-on broadband device, which will allow gamers a wealth of options, from wireless connectivity to massive multiplayer capabilities, allowing gamers to demo games before purchasing or subscribing. [described] For more information on the Phantom Gaming System, please visit www.phantom.net. Infinium Labs, Inc. does not have any material operations other than those acquired in the acquisition. [more info, but they don't have all info]

    About Infinium Labs, Inc. [they will give info about the company]

    As a result of the acquisition, Infinium Labs Inc. is an industry-leading global entertainment and interactive game company. Infinium Labs has developed and is marketing its flagship product the Phantom Gaming Service, a leading edge and intuitive gaming and content delivery system that is the performance leader in the interactive entertainment industry. Founded and managed by a management team with extensive experience in interactive media, entertainment and technology, Infinium Labs markets a robust gaming system that appeals to a wide audience of consumers and interactive gamers with its ease of use, quality assurance and robust delivery system. For more information, please visit www.infiniumlabs.com or www.phantom.net.

    Safe Harbor Statement [standard statement for legal reasons]

    Certain statements included in this press release may constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from such statements expressed or implied herein as a result of a variety of factors including, but not limited to: the development of the Infinium Labs technology, the successful marketing and distribution of the Phantom Gaming System, acceptance by the market of Infinium Labs, products and technology, competition and timing of projects and trends in the gaming industry, as well as other factors expressed from time to time in filings Infinium Labs will make with

  155. Roberts is a crook, but this is BAD journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be the one who is defending Roberts/Infineum--in fact, I have no doubt they are vaporware purveyors, and Mr. Roberts is a financial vaporware wizard par excellence, if you will--but the original HardOCP article itself, while amusing and entertaining, is a class A example of sloppy, and yes, potentially libelous reporting. It's the same breed of "reporting" that makes Michael Moore movies so frustrating--you agree with the point, but the method is so flawed.

    IANAL, but I'm a senior editor of a mainstream US magazine and if this copy came across my desk the writer would be back on the street doing some real reporting--this article is 99% deskside reporting, with the exception of the funny photos. Whatever unverified facts he doesn't scoop up from the internet (we all know how reliable it is, right?) he gets from either anonymous "volunteers" or he makes an assumption and calls it fact. Sure, he attempts some half-hearted phone calls, but according to the lawyer's letter, he was given opportunity to clarify some points which he refused to do. And how about giving Roberts a chance to defend himself (in a meaningful way)? How about putting in context the fact that 90% of all dotcom-era businesses were guilty of the same excesses (and failures) that his early businesses were party to? How about talking with anyone who has seen the damn Phantom, or works for Infineum or even one person in the gaming industry? And the WorldCom comment is just an absurdity..... etc.

    As much as I agree with the sentiment of the article--Roberts IS a Huckster, IMO--the fact remains that this is a sloppy piece of reporting, and while our libel laws are generally pretty generous to the media, I don't think the lawyer's claims are so farfetched in many cases. This piece was clearly conceived as a hatchet job from the get-go, and would've been stronger, and iron-clad against lawsuits, if some very basic journalistic rules had been followed. So much for fair and balanced...