Slashdot Mirror


DIY HVAC

An anonymous reader writes "I found this very interesting project called DIY Zoning. It allows one to add air flow balancing, temperature control, zoning, home automation, and more to an existing or new HVAC system. After getting a $200 electric bill, this sounds like a good solution for those who are getting screwed with outrageously high electric bills due to their HVAC unit especially since organizations like TVA have raised the electric rates."

315 comments

  1. (Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family! by (1337)+God · · Score: 5, Informative

    DIY Zoning is just one in a family of projects.

    Don't forget about Haywire, Jukebox, and ServoMaster, all of which are hosted at SourceForge and directly tie-in to the temperature zoning system featured in this Slashdot posting.

    [Oh, and FWIW, Professor Tkachenko's son is a cutie (an old college friend of mine knew him)!]

    --

    Background: 28/M/Bi-Sexual; Owner of a Linux company; MBA Harvard 2003; B.S. Comp Sci MIT 2000
  2. What about water conservation?? by troutfisher · · Score: 2, Funny

    Im just waiting for someone to recycle toilet water for showers. When is the madness going to stop.

    1. Re:What about water conservation?? by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Would there be anything wrong with using your shower water as toilet water? I honestly can't see anything wrong with that and it'd certainly cut down on somebody's water bill from month to month.

    2. Re:What about water conservation?? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is going to be the vaguest answer you ever got:

      I saw a program on PBS or The Discovery Channel or HGTV or God knows what channel...

      about a hotel in Arizona or Malaysia or Australia or god knows which country

      which has a water recycling system installed. They have low flow toilets, and a filtration system, and the water is in a clear acryllic case. All the water for the all the systems is mostly recycled.

    3. Re:What about water conservation?? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or rain water. You could save rain water for several purposes, like toilet water and watering your lawn.

      It's even mandatory these days to install a rain water reservoir for new houses (here at least).

    4. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      There's a great deal that can be done to conserve water. Here's a few things:

      • Install stormwater tanks. Hook them up to your roof's stormwater system, with the excess (that the tanks can't store) going into the stormwater drains, as the whole lot used to do. Use this water to flush toilets, water gardens, and possibly wash clothes and shower in (depending on the quality of the rainwater you get).
      • Redirect water from your shower to gardens, toilets, etc. You may need to treat it to get rid of soap, shampoo, etc. residues.
      • Fix those leaking taps.
      • Take shorter showers.
      • Install a water-saving shower head.
      • Stop hosing down the damn concrete driveway. Use a broom, or a blower if you're that damn lazy.
      Here in Australia, stormwater tanks used to be illegal! That's changed, though, as the Powers That Be came to the realisation that our water resources are limited, they won't be expanding, and yet they have to support a growing population. The scary thing is, since my father installed stormwater tanks for our showers, toilets, and laundry, our water bills dropped by a third (or more).

      As an aside, there's one place in Melbourne (Aus) that has no water bill. None. Zero. Zip. They were actually investigated pretty thoroughly when this happened, because authorities assumed they were stealing water from their neighbours. Not so, though; they were just very efficient with their water use and recycling, and were able to fill their needs from stormwater.

    5. Re:What about water conservation?? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I saw a thing a few years ago on a fix it show that had a fancy lid for a toilet that when you flushed it, first the water flowed through a fountain at the top before it went into the commode so that you could wash your hands without turning on the sink faucet.

      Of course I've never seen one in person, so it obviously didn't catch on.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    6. Re:What about water conservation?? by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed, one of the problems we have, conservationally speaking, is that we use our drinking water for everything. There is no water shortage, overall. We have just as much water after you flush your toilet as before. It's just that that water is no longer suitable for drinking.

      Would you buy bottled water to pour into your toilet? Probably not, and yet that is essentially what you're doing right now.

      I like to use a good, old fashioned cistern, a big bucket to collect rain water, for many uses that don't involve ingestion. Why buy "bottled water" to spray across your lawn/plants? Hell, your plants even like it if it's a bit, ummmm, shitty.

      You can learn a lot about water managment by reading books on sailing. When blue water cruising, management of drinking water while still getting other things done requiring the use of water can mean the difference between life and death, not merely a larger water bill. Salt, rain, grey and fresh drinking water all have their various ideal uses.

      KFG

    7. Re:What about water conservation?? by FosterKanig · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is Slashdot. Most of your suggestions involve showers. And bathing.

      There is no money to be saved, with those who don't bathe.

    8. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The run-off from showers / sinks is called 'grey water' (as distinguished from toilets, 'black water'). Just Google for 'grey water recycling'.

    9. Re:What about water conservation?? by gomoX · · Score: 1

      They are already doing it in Japan. My aunt lived there a while. It seems that they like to take a bath after their showers. The water from this bath is later used to do laundry.

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    10. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?

      Sow you talk like a female pig.

    11. Re:What about water conservation?? by jfinke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently got back from Disney World. At Epcot, in Innoventions, they have a "home of the future" tour. Most of the stuff is fluff stuff that if you read sites like slashdot, you would already know about. However, one of the interesting things they show is a plumbing system that takes the hot water going down the drain of your shower and uses it to heat new water going into the shower. I think that she said something like 30% efficiency.

    12. Re:What about water conservation?? by really? · · Score: 1

      That's not very nice. Just because we're geeks ... I resemble comments like that.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    13. Re:What about water conservation?? by Looks_Like_A_Penguin · · Score: 1

      That describes a fairly large percentage of toilets in Japan, I would love to have one in my house in the US for the water savings. These toilets also come (at a cost) with heated seats, and automated bowl cleaners installed.
      LLP

    14. Re:What about water conservation?? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Don't they do this on the ISS?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    15. Re:What about water conservation?? by stilwebm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I stayed at a place like this in Australia. It was a vacation house in the Kangaroo Valley, about 2-3 kilometers from the nearest paved road and 2.5 hours south east of Sydney. It's apparently fairly common in remote areas, not just in Australia. The toilets were low flow, though not much lower flow than the rest of Australia. However, the water was not recycled for drinking water in this case.

      There were two tanks - one caught the majority of the rain water for fresh water, and filtered and chlornated it. The second caught the sewage, again chlornating it and filtering it. The second tank was used for water plants and landscaping and cleaning.

      In the island nation of Burmuda (and other low-lying ilsands which lack freshwater) all homes collect their freshwater from their roof as well. For fire fighting, the tanks must have an unlocked access door for fire tucks to pump water out of the tank.

      Learning things like this make you really appreciate the availablility of fresh water. And staying in the Kangaroo Valley in January makes you really miss HVAC. =)

    16. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      They have low flow toilets, and a filtration system, and the water is in a clear acryllic case. All the water for the all the systems is mostly recycled.

      What's the point of low-flow toilets when you have to flush them 3 or 4 times to get all the shit down? Thankfully I have good old fashioned high flow toilets that only need one flush to totally evacuate the entire bowl full of god-only-knows-what-I-ate-last-night.

    17. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im just waiting for someone to recycle toilet water for showers.

      It happens now. I piss in the Arkansas River in Colorado knowing that it is going on to Texans.

    18. Re:What about water conservation?? by Almost_anonymous_cow · · Score: 1

      The problem lies in the fact that you are not allowed to collect storm water/rain runoff and such. Since in colorado that water is "owned" by various people since that water feeds into rivers and then is diverted off into storage areas. Then is either used in agriculture or then treated. So places that are big into water law ie colorado catching storm water just isnt possible.

    19. Re:What about water conservation?? by nemesisj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hong Kong is kind of unusual (at least, I've never heard of this being done anywhere else) in that they have two different plumbing systems. Toilets use salt water, and the rest of the system uses fresh water. This is because they have to buy their fresh water from mainland China, and it severely reduces their costs to use salt water for their sewage.

    20. Re:What about water conservation?? by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      Grey Water toilet is a great idea until you find out you have a main break in your area and they shut your water off and it will be off for 5-8 days due to weather/whatever excuse.

      In which case, the 3-5 gallons in your toilet would have come in handy. (There is, of course, 30-60 gallons in the water heater if it is prolonged...)

      So if you want to use a system like that, make sure you set aside some containers filled with fresh water in case of an emergency where your water is off. That being said, grey water toilet is a great idea.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    21. Re:What about water conservation?? by michrech · · Score: 1

      It's even mandatory these days to install a rain water reservoir for new houses (here at least).

      Where is "here"?

      Just wondering...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    22. Re:What about water conservation?? by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 1
      As an aside, there's one place in Melbourne (Aus) that has no water bill. None. Zero. Zip. They were actually investigated pretty thoroughly when this happened, because authorities assumed they were stealing water from their neighbours. Not so, though; they were just very efficient with their water use and recycling, and were able to fill their needs from stormwater.
      That sounds very cool, although in Canberra at least you still have to pay a "network availability charge" even if your water supply is disconnected. )-:
    23. Re:What about water conservation?? by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe you should check out the web page for the "Grey water toilet". He uses a nice big plastic 55 gallon drum to store the used water in and it is pumped into the toilet as needed. If anything, he should fare better than the rest of us in a lack of water situation as his shitter will have a ready water supply.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    24. Re:What about water conservation?? by Spruce+Moose · · Score: 2, Informative
      I like to use a good, old fashioned cistern, a big bucket to collect rain water, for many uses that don't involve ingestion. Why buy "bottled water" to spray across your lawn/plants? Hell, your plants even like it if it's a bit, ummmm, shitty.

      It's not such a good idea to use black water on your garden, especially on plants intended for human consumption and is probably illegal wherever you live.

      I was talking with a neighbour about grey water and he pointed out that in general we take water quality for granted unless there is an outbreak of some horrible water-borne illness, which is the point behind the various planning laws to do with grey and black water usage.

    25. Re:What about water conservation?? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      And the little thing that sprays water in your ass. Hard to get used to at first, but pretty nice. The bathroom in America is uber-lowtech compared to Japan.

      I liked the bathtub that maintained a constant water temperature and water level. That was nice...

      --
      My other car is first.
    26. Re:What about water conservation?? by nolife · · Score: 1

      My house has a well for water and a septic system for waste. I am already doing what you suggest you insensitive clod!

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    27. Re:What about water conservation?? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Well, if black water gets into my cistern something has gone horribly, horribly wrong.

      KFG

    28. Re:What about water conservation?? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      However, one of the interesting things they show is a plumbing system that takes the hot water going down the drain of your shower and uses it to heat new water going into the shower. I think that she said something like 30% efficiency.
      This is not science-fictionic EPCOT-fare, but something that is widely used.
    29. Re:What about water conservation?? by jfinke · · Score: 1
      Actually, at this point, I don't know if there is anything in Epcot that I would consider futuristic. Everything in this particular display can be bought currently. Of course, since it is all top of the line stuff, you will pay up the nose, till it becomes popular enough that the price will come down.

      For example, they have a HD Plasma equipped Jacuzzi spa. I am guessing that it is at least $20k. Probably closer to $30k. :)

    30. Re:What about water conservation?? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      His point was in a normal toilet the tank water is potable, if a bit disconcerting, a grey water tank isn't. Althouth the grey water tank lets you poop you dehydrate.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    31. Re:What about water conservation?? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The big globetrotting cruise ship was supposed to have grey water recycling to reduce desalinization requirements. I've been waiting for a tiny flow toilet for liquid waste and a more reasonable flow for the solid waste jobs. Too often the newer 1.5 gallons per flust toilets require multiple flushes, although they are getting better in that regard.
      On a hideously wasteful note, I visited my grandmother this weekend, and she has an ancient showerhead that kicks out well more than the newer showerheads, the shower was a luxury I had forgotton about over the past few years of low flow showers.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    32. Re:What about water conservation?? by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "His point was in a normal toilet the tank water is potable"

      Hehehe, well, those funny blue discs in my tank tank beg to differ with you.

      I guess his point may have been a valid one for potable water, although, I would probably opt for bottled water from the local store.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    33. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, you must be a Republican.

    34. Re:What about water conservation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may sound dumb, but it's true--there have been advances in low-flow toilet's in the last number of years to the point that low flow toilets now flush better than your old fashioned high-flow ones. If you don't believe me, go buy a brand new one from the store.

    35. Re:What about water conservation?? by funwithstuff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And of course, there are places like Mount Nebo, just outside Brisbane (Australia) which don't have town water connected. Rain water/tanker delivered only. So you have to do all of the above and buy huge water storage tanks. Not everyone even in the first world has what to most of us are "basic" amenities.

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
    36. Re:What about water conservation?? by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You have Slashdot confused with France. Geeks shower only when needed, not every n hours just because someone arbitrarily decided that n+1 hours makes you dirty, whereas the French, well, they just don't bathe at all, for some reason. :)

    37. Re:What about water conservation?? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Flanders. North part of Belgium (Well, until the revolution comes).

  3. HVAC Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioning by maliabu · · Score: 5, Informative

    for non-eXtreme geeks like myself, HVAC stands for Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioning.

  4. That project doesn't conform to the industry specs by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not that it would matter to you if you are working on it by yourself, but without support for the technologies that the spec requires going forward, you face the unenviable position of being stuck with some out of date specs.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  5. Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Put the real thermostat somewhere hidden and place a dummy one in the hall for the wife and kids.

    Putting a circuit in to turn off the AC when someone opens a window helps too.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, that works until said spouse calls the repairman because the furnace/AC isn't working and discovers you have been less than forthcoming about what you think about cost cutting measures.

      A better idea: talk with the husband/wife and determine what you can afford to set the thermostat to. Make it clear to the kids that it is not their place to adjust the thermostat.

      Seems easier than coming up with an elaborate decoy system.

    2. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even cheaper, don't get married and don't get kids.

    3. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't leave your VCR, radio and all other electric devices on standby all the time. They use up a significant amount of power each year.

    4. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, unplug your clock radio if you don't need the alarm function. The glowing LEDs use up a whole 5 cents of electricity (probably $5 in Europe) each year.

    5. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Daniel+Quinlan · · Score: 4, Funny
      Put the real thermostat somewhere hidden and place a dummy one in the hall for the wife and kids.

      Yeah, because divorce is always cheaper than paying higher electrical bills, right?

    6. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by eriksarcade · · Score: 2, Funny

      ahhh, the slashdot way!

    7. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by shepd · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do believe that is false economy. The wear on the receptacle and plug itself will likely cause premature replacement of either. Meaning...

      You will pay more for parts than for the electricity ($1.25 for the entire lifetime of the device, or, about 30 cents yearly).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by /dev/trash · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're not married with kids are you?

    9. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by cfuse · · Score: 1
      A better idea: talk with the husband/wife and determine what you can afford to set the thermostat to. Make it clear to the kids that it is not their place to adjust the thermostat.

      Or just say: "Bitch, get back in the kitchen and make me some pie. And tell those damn kids to get off my lawn."

    10. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by mchappee · · Score: 1


      > A better idea: talk with the husband/wife and determine
      > what you can afford to set the thermostat to. Make it
      > clear to the kids that it is not their place to adjust the thermostat.

      Gee Mr. Cleaver, can The Beave come out and play?

      Matthew

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    11. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Kent+Brewster · · Score: 5, Funny

      Placebostats worked quite nicely for me a few years back when I was converting a warehouse to an open-plan office building. The poodleheads in sales and marketing froze to death in the offices and the tech support types sweated in the cube farm in the middle. This had resulted in spectacular Thermostat Wars in the old building, and quite a lot of interest from the poodleheaded sales and marketing types in making sure that Everyone Who Mattered was warm enough the next time around. (Remember, the person who is colder always beats the person who is hotter, especially if the person who is colder is a female person and the person who is hotter is not. This seems counterintuitive; the person who is colder can always wear more clothes, while there is a lower limit to the number of clothes the person who is hotter may remove in the workplace ... but I digress.)

      We found some very nice dummies that lit up, clicked, and hummed convincingly. Problem solved ... although I must concur with the poster above me who said Don't Try This At Home.

    12. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the 'kids' are housemates who are 20-25 years old, and don't like being told that it's plenty cool enough in the house.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    13. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, decoys work.

      I work for an HVAC controls contractor selling Automated Logic controls. We routinely install sensors with setpoint adjustment sliders on them, then limit the adjustment to +/-2 degrees. Some customers ask us to limit it to +/-0 degrees, essentially installing a placebo. It works. Even when there's only a placebo in place, the service calls are for actual problems.

      People only need to think they're in control to feel better. And any spouse that calls a repairman without consulting their mate is a nympho, just so you know.

    14. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by afidel · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU. I have been thinking that all the people whining about standby mode have been whining about nothing. Now I have the proof to back it up. Thirty cents per watt per year is so miniscule. Hell I saved almost $20/month by putting up drapes in front of my sliding glass door in addition to the blinds.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Put the real thermostat somewhere hidden and place a dummy one in the hall for the wife and kids.
      Is a surefire way to utterly disable your system as 'hidden' spots tend to not get any airflow, and thus their temperature does not vary as much as the rest of the house.
      Putting a circuit in to turn off the AC when someone opens a window helps too.
      Learning to live without AC helps even more.
    16. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I saw an article a few months back in the WSJ about many a company that saved a collective fortune with dummy terminals. Our building went the opposite route, the HVAC system simply breaks whenever anyone tries to adjust the temp.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    17. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean I should leave my 100W guitar amplifier on standby all the time, instead of turning it off?

    18. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by mpe · · Score: 1

      Don't leave your VCR, radio and all other electric devices on standby all the time. They use up a significant amount of power each year.

      In winter and cold climates if you turned them off you'd wind up using at least as much energy for an alternative source of heating.

    19. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      Not if you live somewhere with over-engineered square-pin plugs like the UK or Malta ;-) I've never seen one of our plugs wear out.

      Anyway, this misses the point; all that is required is the on/off switch, not unplugging the thing from the wall!

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    20. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Anyway, this misses the point; all that is required is the on/off switch, not unplugging the thing from the wall!

      Now there's the problem! Edison plugs don't have an on/off switch, and separate wall switches are extremely user-unfriendly (how many times have I turned off a friends TV when looking for a lightswitch? Too many.) :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    21. Re:Easier way to lower the electricity bill by bradly.mcconnell · · Score: 1

      Install ceiling fans in the rooms where you spend the most time - they make a world of difference both summer and winter.

  6. This king of thing... by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is going on a lot here where I live. Berea College has completely rebuilt many of their buildings to make them more environmentally friendly, and to cut down on their "outrageous energy costs". Not to mention that Berea College owns all the utilities here anyways.

    I really don't get why this kind of project is really worthy of doing anyways. May save some money, but most people's houses dont use more than 1500 kWa of electricity a month... ~140$ of electricty around here (considering we pay the "Berea College Utilities" tax). Now a worthy project would be covering your house with solar panels and breaking even on your utility bills ;).

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:This king of thing... by canavan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Photovoltaic panels are NOT (yet?) environmentally friendly, as their production is a very messy and energy consuming process.

      Your argument about Berea owning the utilities seems flawed, unless of course they are operating their own oil wells or hydroelectric plants or whatever, in which case they could still sell the excess energy they are not wasting due to the rebuild.

    2. Re:This king of thing... by Cameroon · · Score: 1

      Well, the panels would still be worthwhile so long as using them prevents more mess than creating them causes.

      I have no idea if that's the case, but I imagine someone around here knows...

    3. Re:This king of thing... by Synonymous+Yellowbel · · Score: 0

      IIRC (though imprecisely) the energy break-even on a solar panel with average domestic usage is many years, somewhere around 10 - 15. May be as low as 7 though.

    4. Re:This king of thing... by canavan · · Score: 1

      This depends a lot on where you live. In sunny parts of california, outside the smog of LA, on may be luchy and reach break-even in 10 years, in Canada or Norway, it will probably never happen.

    5. Re:This king of thing... by shokk · · Score: 1

      What is the expected lifespan of a panel put into use? If it pays for itself in 10 and lasts about that more or less, it may not be worth it. If it lasts 75 years, then we are thinking too short-term by declaring the process dead because it may be obviously messy...start covering the grass.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    6. Re:This king of thing... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Most of the math I've seen shows them paying for themselves in about 15-20 years. However, that cost does not account for the amazingly environmentally nasty production method. The pollutants that are a by-product of PV cell creation are similar to those from printed circuit board construction, but you don't have to cover your roof in printed circuit boards.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:This king of thing... by Synonymous+Yellowbel · · Score: 1

      I don't know the lifespan of a panel, but it sounds like you misunderstood my implication. I would guess that panels would generally last longer than their break-even point, but by indicating that there was a break-even point at all, I meant to imply that they do become worthwhile if in use for a sufficiently long period.

    8. Re:This king of thing... by vthome · · Score: 1

      The primary reason for this project was *not* the cost, but comfort. Read the FAQ:

      http://diy-zoning.sourceforge.net/docs/FAQ.html# ob jective

      See, in Arizona, it gets really hot sometimes...

    9. Re:This king of thing... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      What about a water/pipe heating system, I know of a bunch of systems in Montana, used for pre water heating, why couldn't more be used in a home heating system. The other technology that seems like a killer idea are geothermal heat pumps, they have another name, but that's the trade name. It's basically a reversable AC that uses the earth as its condensing/expansion coil (depending on if you want heating or cooling. They use electricity, but work very well.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:This king of thing... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Well, the answer would be it takes alot less solar panels for a truly energy efficient building. And it may be cheaper to scrap the building and do it over right, than use the panel on solar panels so that more than have the energy actually produced is wasted through the windows and walls. I'd much rather live in an average home with great windows, great walls, a good roof and decent flooring, than I'd be in a poorly built house covered with solar panels. Trust me, it is alot better to build with the environment in mind than against it and use energy to "correct" bad design.

    11. Re:This king of thing... by shokk · · Score: 1

      What I meant to say was that if they last 15-20 years and pollute less over those 15-20 years than continued use of current fossil-based methods, that is still a step forward. If PCB manufacturing pollution is considered more harmful, then as ObiWan might say "this is not the solution you are looking for."

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  7. HVAC? by halo8 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    WTF is an HVAC???

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  8. Bills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why I only use solar energy!

    Ack, gotta go, a cloud's coming!

  9. Do it yourself by capz+loc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A friend of mine is doing this himself using parts from a website (the name escapes me) and drivers that he is writing himself. I also ran into this a while back. It looks like a lot of work, but considering how much a system like this would cost, its probably a pretty fair bet for experienced hackers with some spare time.

    1. Re:Do it yourself by APL+bigot · · Score: 1

      The referenced site:
      www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-mini/Home-Electrical-Contr ol.html

      ASCII art diagrams!? Wow, real 1337!

      --
      Heisenberg may have been here.
  10. Don't complain about TVA by frostgiant · · Score: 5, Informative

    Complaining about TVA rates? Haha... You are getting some of the cheapest, subsidized electricity in the country.

    Read this:
    http://www.nemw.org/tvareport.htm

    1. Re:Don't complain about TVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why should 242 million Americans be forced to subsidize the electricity rates of the 3 percent of Americans who happen to live in the Tennessee Valley? (from the link)

      because next time there's a New Madrid 3 month long Earthquake, any energy system but electric will kill more people than firestone tires. TVA is all about keeping nuke plants off of land that'll kill the east coast with fallout next time.

    2. Re:Don't complain about TVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TVA recieves NO federal funds... They did for the the parks such as "land between the lakes" that it operated but that has been turned over to Corp of Engineers. (services have been slashed since then- corp gets the same dollars).

    3. Re:Don't complain about TVA by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      No but look at the cost of building one of those dams, that were basically gifted to the areas that get the power. Those of us lucky enough to live in a hydro plant powered area pay for the variable costs of the power, they didn't have to pay off the cost of the dam.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    4. Re:Don't complain about TVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be paying for a variable rate but it isnt because of TVA take a closer look at you local provider (Electric Board). There rates are the ones that are changing. And another thing dont complain if you have gas heat TVA does not have anything with your gas bill.

  11. wow that freaked me out for a second by re-Verse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone remember way back in the BBS days of the early 90s (when the net was new or undiscovered for so many) when HVAC meant "hacking, virii, anarchy, cracking"?

    What a weird yet fitting title to see on /.

    1. Re:wow that freaked me out for a second by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought that was HPAVC.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:wow that freaked me out for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually you used any of those letters
      depending on what you actually had on your board.

      You didnt HAVE to be HPAVC or HVAC.

      God those were the days.. I ran Renegade
      for 6 years.

    3. Re:wow that freaked me out for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was. The P was for Phreaking (phone mischief)

    4. Re:wow that freaked me out for a second by jorlando · · Score: 1

      Thanks for remind me that I'm old as a dinossaur... I knew that the acronym reminded me of something. Better I start thinking about modding wheel-chairs and how to get high using alzheilmer's medicine...

    5. Re:wow that freaked me out for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh - I'd moderate you funny over my own comment if i had the karma :)

    6. Re:wow that freaked me out for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was indeed.

      HPVAC == Hacking/Phreaking/Virii/Anarchy/Cracking

  12. Zoning rocks by MajorDick · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an ex plumber-pipefitter, zoning is a must for any eficient system.

    Take this house for example, 2000 sq ft 2 story farmhouse, 1950's anderson windows, still nice but not real tight, no in wall insulation, attic is aesbestos (but now sealed)

    The house is set up into 3 zones, on an old , circa 1950 American Standard electro-mechanical zone system, it is hot water heat, about half baseboard, the other half cast radiators, the heat throught the hose is awesome, never too cold anywhere. Now, the fun part, we dont have gas, and electric was way too ineffecient to heat this house soooo, my grandfather a pipefitter as well installed the system back in the 50's ,it is looks like a full blown commercial install, When I was out of town once the boiler went out (flooded expansion tank) so my wife called the company I worked for, my friend glen cam out and said , "uhhh youre gonna have to call in a commercial outfit were all residential and Ive never seen a system like this before Chris (me usually handles all our commercial stuff"

    The wind up of all this , my heating bill for the entire year ? Under $600 Thats 350 gallons of oil, I only took 310 or so after 13 months last time I topped off. And I live near Cleveland Ohio (Akron), not exactly warm winters here ya know

    1. Re:Zoning rocks by PepperGrunties · · Score: 1

      So what do you recommend for a one story 1960's Florida house with mostly awning windows and a 300 sq. ft in-law suite on the other side of the garage from the 1600 sq. ft. main part of the house. Should I pay to add it to the main AC system? It's currently some kind of geothermal setup where there is no outdoor evaporator.

      I fear mold and mildew issues in that part of the house in the summer.

      Thanks!

    2. Re:Zoning rocks by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      Sorry, cant help you, heating was my specialty, steam and hot water, here our Plumbers union is part of the Pipefitters union (one of very few in the country that way, so I was trained in both) The air guys as we call them could help better, the only time I ever used geotherm was to eliminate chillers in a hospital.

      Beside, this is Ohio we dont need (I mean REALLY need) Air conditioning like you folks in Florida :)

    3. Re:Zoning rocks by afidel · · Score: 1

      Average high temp during the summer is only about 8 degrees higher in Tampa Florida then it is in Cleveland Ohio, so yes we need AC just as much as they do.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Zoning rocks by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      I dono, I can handle heat, even excessive heat, as long as its fairly dry, and Oh yes It gets muggy here, especially the last 2 years it seems, but its on and off, but In Florida (even more so in Mobile AL) I feel like Im trying to breathe underwater. I use AC as much for the temp reduction as getting the damm humidy out of the air. Maybe thats just me, like I said heat I can handle try working in a boiler (yes inside) and welding all day long, average temp inside 130+ degrees. You get used to it but damm just keep the humidity away from me !

      Or you could be like my dad he has this syndrome, I cant find it on the web at least the way Im spelling it, basically if he gets even the slightest cold his body improperly triggers and it acts like hes going hypothermic, he looses feeling in his extremeties , he gets confused, all kinds of stuff because the blood rushes to protect his organs. Its funny to see someone wearing glovs and a hat at 55 deegrees :)

    5. Re:Zoning rocks by instarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and electric was way too ineffecient to heat this house

      Electric resistance heating is 100% efficient. What you really should say is the cost of electricity in your area makes electric heating too expensive.

  13. Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's quite simple, really.

    Learn to do without.

    I know it sounds contrite, but hear me out.

    Do you really need both of those monitors? If not, chuck one, or turn it off. Monitors draw quite a bit of power. Also, make sure you turn off your monitors when you're not using them, or make sure their power saving modes are on. Alternatively, you could go LCD to help reduce the costs, but I've always looked at that with some suspicion in that the prohibitive costs related to 19" and higher LCD's offset the potential savings.

    How many computers are you running? If the answer is more than one, ask yourself if you really *need* to be running the others. Sure it's nice that you've gotten that old P233 up and running as your firewall, but frankly, a Linksys dedicated router/firewall is going to draw much less power, with fewer moving parts.

    Air Conditioning: Learn to live a bit warmer. Learn to open windows instead of reaching for the thermostat. You'll find that your body can and will adjust to warmer temperatures if you let it. I live in the South with oppressive humidity and heat during the summer and my dad tells me stories of him growing up when they didn't have A/C. It can be done. And, if you follow the first 2 items above, you'll find your house isn't as hot. Computers + Monitors == lots of heat. Now, in my apartment, I don't have central A/C, only a couple window units, unfortunately. A trick I've learned is to shut the door to my bedroom, which happens to be decently sized, and only run the A/C in that room. It gets downright cold pretty fast. Now, it does make me somewhat of a prisoner in that room, only venturing out to use the can or to cook something in the kitchen, but I've learned to cope. Besides, I can grab my laptop and browse the web wirelessly from anywhere in my house. Also, at least here, the hottest part of the summers is only one or 2 months that you have to "suffer" through. Actually, if you work a lot, here's an excuse to work some OT. :)

    My bill dropped from $150/month to less than $50/month once I adopted these measures.

    If you're married with kids, feel free to ignore because I'm assuming most of the /. readership are bachelor males. Of course, a fantasy alternative would be to get a girlfriend with her own place and just crash over there.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      I agree, the entire approach to the DIY problem as advocated in the SourceForge project is overkill. For those of us who simply can't stand the heat, there are very reasonable do-it-yourself solutions which consume very little energy, provide wireless and RS-232 interfaces for monitoring, and free one's time up for more meaningful projects (I've provided links elsewhere). This project seems to be a solution in search of a problem...

    2. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by dattaway · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you really need both of those monitors?

      My monitors *are* my zoned heating system. A small quartz heater take up what else the distributed computing doesn't make. I can keep my living area around 80 degrees (I like it hot) with a total monthly utility bill less than $100.

      The hotter months, I move my hobbies down to the basement in the furnished bomb shelter. Underground, its much cooler. My LCD displays with the backlight on soft only consumes a few watts, so they are good. Summer utility bills are less than $60 and I get to leave florescent lights on.

    3. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Smidge204 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's all fine and good. In fact, it's excellent.

      But a good HVAC system will save you electricity AND fuel, being better able to meet the heating/cooling demands better. That translates to lower costs all around - AND more comfort!

      A good HVAC system doesn't even need to be all that complicated, either. Chances are it's already possible to have your home re-evaluated and do a minor tweak to save a few bucks.

      If you've got baseboard heat (hot water), and ever had or will soon have your boiler replaced, it's worth doing a detailed heat load calculation. Chances are the guy installing the new boiler will probably size it up to handle what the radiation is designed to put out - and typically it's quite a bit more than you actually need to keep the house comfy warm!

      This results in the boiler cranking out more hot water than is actually required, and with a single-zone system you'll end up with some rooms too hot and others too cool. The boiler will also short-cycle more often, resulting in poor efficiency.

      There's several solutions you could use. Putting the right sized boiler is obviously the best way to go if you don't want to redo the whole house, but if you've got plenty of radiation (and a newer, non-cast-iron boiler!), why not run your system at a lower water temperature? The boiler won't have to work as hard to get up to temperature, and it'll stay off longer (feeding off the latent heat to keep the water warm). A simple tweak of the boiler's temperature shutoff and a 3-way mixing valve is usually all it takes.

      While you're at it, clean that fintube. Maybe throw some insulation on those pipes in the basement. Little things like that are easy to do and certaintly can't hurt.
      =Smidge=

    4. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      the computational potency of the earth is not infinite. do not turn of your computers, and make sure they are doing something at all time so long as it is reasonable to do so. i have 3 computers on right now, although one is being used to look at porn and browse slashdot(two relatively useless activities). contriubte to folding@home, or even seti@home if you must... help distributed computing projects with your cycles if you have nothing better to do with them. only leave your cycles empty when you are using your computer actively, and when you 'might need them' (ie, my main system(p-166 with 32mb ram) thrashes when i'm using either 100% of my ram+swap or 100% of my cpu... and this wastes human-time.) instead of looking for YOUR best interest as a capitalist, look for the SPECIES best interest by helping us increase the computational fortitude of the whole.
      thedark.moonside.org total Mhz: 351

      don't like the cost? then join us in the revolution - there's no reason for electricity to cost anything beyond simple greed, and the initial costs.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    5. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah I _need_ to have 3 pc's running.

      how the hell you except me to keep warm you know? the central heating isn't the best around here and it's usually only hot for 1 month per year.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Here's another one. Air Conditioners: Get a f'n swamp cooler and use that instead. Keep the AC around for when the swamp cooler has failed. If you put a cover on it, it will keep for a long time. The swamp cooler does nothing but pump a little water (a trivial amount of electricity) and blow a lot of air (a few amps for a really big one to cool a good sized house, say four bedrooms, but less than running an AC compressor and fan.) They blow a lot of cool air, and on really hot days they may drop the temperature 20 degrees. For larger loads you can add a cooling tower which is supposed to do quite a bit.

      The one problem with swamp coolers is, they don't work in the places with the highest humidity, which is even hard on an AC system, which has to remove that water to efficiently remove the heat. So if you live in Florida, it's not going to help you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1
      . Learn to open windows instead of reaching for the thermostat.


      *snort* Yea I'm going to leave my windows wide open and invite burgulars. That's a fantastic idea. WRT to the "it can be done" referencing living in the sauna that is Spring to fall in Florida, just because it CAN be done doesn't mean I'm going to do it voluntarily. I like to sweat when I'm excercising, having sex, or OD'ing on Curry/Chili. Not when I'm sitting still or sleeping.

      And the humidity and mold (esp. Aspergillus Niger) in Florida will really do wonders for my allergies, the condition of my hardware/books/etc.

      No thanks. The humid, moldy environment can stay OUTSIDE where it belongs.

      I think turning machines off when you're not using them is a good idea, but I have many reasons (MythTV being one of them) for having more than one machine running at times.

      FWIW, my internet lag is lower with the dedicated PPro 200 running smoothwall than it is with the dedicated consumer box it replaced. Thats a priority for me. Might not be for others, but since gaming is ~80% of my entertaining budget, I take it seriously.

      Also, Im now seeing 19 monitors for around $100 more than 17's. Still only 1280x1024, but I'm tempted to replace my CRT for the reasons you list (and because the 17" LCD I got for my secondary display has a much cleaner color profile than the CRT.
      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    8. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Your advice is sound, except a lot of us (well, me) live in apartments. Mine is a converted house (3 units). The biggest problem is that I have no control over what the landlords decide to use where. The biggest thing I've done is put those nifty flourescent "bulbs" in various light sockets.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    9. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Moofie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Learn to live a bit warmer?

      Please. Do you live in Texas? I don't want to hear about doing without air conditioning. I had no AC in my car, and I had to drive a lot. Spending eight hours sweating in 80 consecutive days of over-100 degree heat is not fun.

      I'm sorry, but air conditioning in this state is not a luxury one can "do without".

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Moofie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...solutions that you can't bother to link to? Somebody had a problem, they solved the problem, they posted the solution, and you think they shouldn't have bothered because you don't like the solution?

      Boy, I sure do love useless backbiting. It makes me so much more eager to share the fruits of MY labor with the world.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      If you live in an apartment, you have little or no control over the HVAC anyway, and probably pay a flat fee for heating (or it's built into your rent). So yeah, little you can do 'bout it... might be able to convince the landlord to take a look, since it'll save him some cash and make the tenants more comfy!
      =Smidge=

    12. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      I did provide links...browse at +5 and look for them.

    13. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but air conditioning in this state is not a luxury one can "do without".
      Right. That's why the state was utterly depopulated until AC was invented...

      Don't confuse your inability or lack of desire to cope with natural law.
    14. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another option in high humidity locations is to just get a de-humidifier.

      If you own your home, consider getting awnings, trees, or some other source of shade for your western exposure.

      Also, try and create a cross-breeze through the house from the bottom of the "cold" side to the top of the warm side. Double-hung windows and attic fans are both good for this.

      Zoning's benefit is that you don't over heat/cool areas that aren't occupied.

    15. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      One trick I picked up last summer was to take a quick cool shower right before bed. The water cools you off, and again when it evaporates. My apartment has no AC and while I am fine during the day up to about 105, the warmer nights here in the summer, were a bit more than this desert boy could adapt.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    16. Re:Here's some solutions to help lower the bill: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like to sweat when I'm excercising, having sex,

      Uhh, dude, you read slashdot. I seriously doubt you do either of those things. Ever.

  14. Looking in all the wrong places by pongo000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The project was born out of a total and absolute frustration which in turn was a result of a fruitless search of information about existing temperature zoning solutions. The only information available on the zoning system manufacturer web sites was usually "call us for an estimate". The estimates were usually being performed by salespeople. Technical people were difficult to get. Read the complete story for details.

    The author obviously didn't look in the right places. Here are a few links to get started:

    SmartHome
    HomeTech Solutions
    Bass Burglar Alarms

    I've done business with all three, and have retrofitted my home with a two-zone system powered by an RCS zone controller and electronic dampers. All three have been extremely helpful in providing technical advice.

    One thing to remember: The HVAC business (as well as the burglar alarm business) are very protective of their turf. You stand little chance of finding an HVAC contractor willing to work with you on designing a custom HVAC system.

    1. Re:Looking in all the wrong places by vthome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Beg to differ - I did look into those places, all three of them.

      SmartHome - X10? A device with unreliable delivery? One network failure, and Boom-Puff up goes in smoke your expensive equipment. Thank you.

      And the others - well, they may have not existed at the time the project was started - that was about three years ago.

      As for your warning - yes, that's right. If you read the articles on the site, you'll find that this exact warning is written in bold face all over. Too bad. Go read the history of the project, and you'll see how they treated me back then :)

  15. Programmable Thermostat? by Tablespork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So this is essentially a programmable thermostat for your PC with some more advancded features like zones, right? Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Programmable Thermostat? by vthome · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are.

      HVAC *is* a rocket science. Read the FAQs on the site to find out *why*.

  16. Open sourcing everything by nmoog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The HVAC community is definitely different from Open Source community, and whenever they get close, it gets quite hot

    Doesn't seem that hot - fun reading I'd say! The idea is great though (not new, but great) - As open source branches in to more and more area, the people involved with open source software are more likely to adapt OSS principles to non-software aspects of their work.

    "An open-source future is one in which we realize that reality itself is open source" to quote an unknown guy on the internet. Hope it happens this year!

  17. Open Source Energy Initiatives by Snoobs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the idea of open source energy solutions is a great idea. Right now, we have NO choice of who we buy our electricity from. The situation with electricity and fuel is 20X worse than Microsoft's control of the computer industry. What happens when petroleum gets too expensive and runs out?

    Its time to do something about it.

    1. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by toast0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On a similar note, we have no choice of who we buy our water from, and who we give our sewage to.

    2. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by Bagels · · Score: 1

      ...Actually, I'm not sure how it works elsewhere, but here in Maine we can choose who to buy power from on an open market... of course, the same company, Central Maine Power, still "delivers" the power via its powerlines.

      --
      --- Bwah?
    3. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live.

      If you live in a "wet" climate, I'm sure there's little stopping you from collecting your own rainwater, which wold be suitable for just about everything short of drinking. (A distiller or neutralizer/filter might be adequate for potble water, though... I wouldn't trust it for drinking myself without some kind of treatment!)

      And around where I live, we don't give out sewage to anyone - the whole area is private cesspools. Not necessarily better or worse than municipal sewers, though. Just a different way to handle it.
      =Smidge=

    4. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by slash-tard · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you "open source" an energy provider?

      Do you have all of the supporters eat taco bell and donate the excess methane at the nearest methane collection center?

      I guess the electricity could come from static buildup from all the hairy slashdot readers.

      Alternate providers is hardly open source, and having alternate providers of a single commodity isnt going to help when its depleted.

    5. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe you don't have a choice, but I do.

      My water comes from my own well in the front yard. I'm in control of it. If I want to know whats in it, I have to test it. If I want to kill bacteria I have to buy the clorine, and follow directions. If the pump breaks I have to fix it (more likely pay to fix it, the pump is 200 feet underground).

      My sewage goes to my own septic tank. I have to pay to get this pumped every few years, but there are several different companies that will do this. When the lines freeze I have to figgure out how to thaw them. (Stupid installer can't install lines that don't freeze... I'll try again to correct that next summer, but it isn't as easy as it sounds)

      If you have a choice, get city sewer, it is much cheaper, and a lot less hasstles. I prefer well water, but some will disagree with me, it is a matter of taste. Most of the people who disagree with me have had problems with their well though, something to take note of.

      Even if you have city hookups, you have choices. You can vote for someone who won't maintain the plant for instance. Closer to home, most city water systems could use further treatment. They give you safe water, it may or may not taste good. It may or may not stain your clothing. It may or may not need extra soap to clean clothing. It may or may not have sand mixed in. And those are just things locals watch for, your area may have other things to worry about.

      Most people don't think of any of the above though. Just turn on the tap and there is water. (at least where /. is common, most of the world's population doesn't have that advantage) I don't normally think about it either, but once in a while I have to.

    6. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by whovian · · Score: 1

      You're partly incorrect:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=water+delivery

      As for sewage, I agree. As long as somone takes all my shit, I'm happy.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    7. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by michael_cain · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Depends on where you live.

      If you live in a "wet" climate, I'm sure there's little stopping you from collecting your own rainwater, which wold be suitable for just about everything short of drinking. (A distiller or neutralizer/filter might be adequate for potble water, though... I wouldn't trust it for drinking myself without some kind of treatment!)

      And around where I live, we don't give out sewage to anyone - the whole area is private cesspools. Not necessarily better or worse than municipal sewers, though. Just a different way to handle it.

      Depends very much on where you live. Here, in one of the Denver suburbs, semi-arid climate, the following rules come into play:

      • No new cesspools or septic fields allowed. Inside the city limits, developers are required to connect to city services. If you have an existing septic field, and want to subdivide a portion of your property, you won't be given permission until you shut down the field and connect to city services.

      • No new wells allowed. If you decide the septic field is not worth the trouble and want to connect to city sewage, you'll have to shut down an existing well and connect to city water also. Outside the city, wells have a different set of problems. Shallow wells are not reliable. Deep wells into some aquifers are regulated by the state now. Up in the foothills, it is not unusual to have to drill 10K feet in order to establish a reliable well. Pumping water that far is expensive.

      • Collecting rainfall and storing it is, in general, illegal. Senior water rights to runoff from your property are held by someone downstream. Trust me on this one, buying water from the city is cheaper than trying to find all of the people that might have rights to your runoff. Since some of those rights will be held by the local municipal government, who will not be shy about taking you to court when you try to install a cistern of any size.
      Water law in the western US is bizarre, to say the least.
    8. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by EvanTaylor · · Score: 1

      You should REALLY look into your history book for answers to those laws. The homestead act, and the utter failure that it was (the railroad would bring rain by changing the electromagnetic fields on the prairie, or that there was a 7 year or so wet spell when they drew up the plans for that area) and the extreme need of water in your area caused that legislation. If someone messed with your water you could kill them and tell the sherriff in the morning, no harm no foul.

      Those laws, as limiting as they are to you now, back in the day helped make your area of the US livable and less chaotic.

      --
      Sleep is for the weak.
    9. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by enronman · · Score: 1

      Actually, in many (but not all) states you DO have a choice of where you buy your power from. Overall, the basic economics of being able to deliver power on demand have a cost range that is pretty tight. Free choice with power if fine and all but your not going to see it cost that much less because quite frankly most power companies are NOT making money hand over fist. If your aware of anyone making some outrageously HUGE profit please do share.

    10. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      That is definately messed up.

      So let me get this straight... I can be taken to court by the town for putting a 30-gallon trash can under the downspout on my house?

      Does it occur to anyone that this saves the municipality water in the long run?

      They'd be better off making laws against watering your lawn and washing your car, which I'm sure they already do. If you're going to use X gallons of water to keep a garden in the back yard, it makes much more sense to collect rainwater for it than to let it soak into the ground wasted, only to pump it out again miles away and pipe it all the way back.

      I can't even see how the other reply to your post applies here...it's not like you're pumping it out of a stream, it's falling on your property! By that logic is would be illegal to have a well period, because that water would otherwise be pumped out elsewhere!

      Bizarre indeed!
      =Smidge=

    11. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Those laws, as limiting as they are to you now, back in the day helped make your area of the US livable and less chaotic.

      No argument about that. I lived on the Nebraska side of the Colorado-Nebraska border for several years. The 1923 South Platte River Compact is still binding and sets a schedule for how much water Colorado must deliver to Nebraska, in the river bed (not by pipe!), for each day of the year. Prior to the compact, Colorado was diverting the entire river and putting the Nebraska farmers out of business. It was not unheard of for there to be "raids" across the border to blow up diversion facilities. However...

      How much sense does it make to preserve the same laws today? Agriculture is less than 5% of the gross state product in Colorado, is barely less expensive than buying food from wetter areas, but accounts for almost 95% of the water use in the state. Because the farmers hold the most senior rights, they are not required to change their practices and conserve during dry years -- even though a 10% decrease in agricultural use (quite feasible through improved techniques) would save more water than used by all the cities in the state! Using that water on lawns to attract people who work at IBM or Liberty Media or any of the new biotech firms in Boulder is a much more "efficient" use of the resource.

      At the time that most of the water laws were put in place, interracial marriage was illegal in most places and many states did not allow women to vote (Colorado was an exception there). The fact that something made sense 100 years ago does not mean that it makes sense today.

    12. Re:Open Source Energy Initiatives by shplorb · · Score: 1

      Here in Adelaide, Australia (where the last linux.conf.au was held) we have/had a septic system. The town that I live in has recently been hooked up to the sewer system, after being on septic tanks for 150-odd years. We eventually forced the governments hand when an environmental survey was done and found that way over 50% of tanks were defective and leaking raw sewage into the river, but the bastards got us back - they made us pay through the nose for the system. (I guess the upside is that now blocks can be subdivided because you don't have to set aside space for a tank + soakage area)

      Our house is relatively new, about 12 or 13 years I think. From around the time when we built it, the government banned traditional septic tank + soakage systems. Instead now you have to install an aerobic treatment system. (Known as a Supertreat or Envirocycle system.)

      Ours worked great (it's now disconnected and sits there with the controller box sitting on the top of the tank that's exposed in the corner of the lawn - too expensive to remove, we'll use it to store rainwater for the garden) - you have a normal septic tank that solids settle and decompose in (needs to be sludge-pumped every 5 years or so) and another tank that the liquid overflows into. Inside, that tank is divided into quarters, with each quarter containing a baffle structure. The water moves from one segment to the next, whilst an aerator pumps loads of air into it. Bacteria grow on the baffles and consume much of the nutrients in the water, and they thrive because they're oxygenated (aerobic decomposition - produces carbon dioxide rather than the methane/landfill/swamp gas you get from anaerobic decomposition). When the water reaches the last quarter, it's pumped out and has a bit of chlorine injected into it to kill the nasty bugs and neutralise the odour. The water is suitable for irrigation/non-primary contact.

      We used to use it to water our lawns and gardens and they were always lush-green - even in the middle of summer. Since hooking up to the sewer system our lawn is almost dead this summer, and so are the gardens. We have water restrictions (thanks to lack of foresight by successive governments) and if we were to water our lawns and gardens with as much water as we got from the septic system our water bill would have us eating baked beans for dinner every night. =\

      It sucks. We had to pay a ~$150 service contract yearly for the supertreat system, which got us quarterly inspections and chlorine top-ups. Now we have to pay sewer rates and our garden is essentially dead =[ (Heh, and here we are living of a friggin' plant nursery!) We had the option of not connecting to the sewer system because of the supertreat system, but we would have had to pay the sewer rates anyway just because it runs past our place! (The reasoning being that access to mains water and sewer services increase the value of your property (Oh, and the rates are based on the value of your property too!) Why the fuck don't they do that for power and gas too huh?)

      Lifes a bitch, but you do have choices. Sink a bore or put in rainwater tanks and a supertreat system.

  18. Use less power? Nah, use more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is the fate of a few third-world countries compared to the convenience of a heated driveway.

    Throw that snow shovel away!

  19. Here are some more ideas (with graphs) by mc6809e · · Score: 4, Informative

    This site includes a number of ideas for reducing that energy bill, including zoned heating/cooling. There are several interesting real-time graphs of current energy use.

    I found the site while searching for information on heat pump water heaters. One example graph they give shows the heat pump water heater using less than half the energy as resistive heating.

    If installed properly, a heat pump water heater will also help air-condition your house. A good place to put ducts is in the kitchen, where the waste heat from cooking can be removed and used to heat water. Ideally, the returned cooled air can be directed at your refrigerator's condenser coils for increased efficiency.

  20. Two concerns: Resale and housing code by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While there's no good reason I can think of that retrofitted zoning would be a zoning problem, sometimes what's permissable and what's not isn't always self-evident.

    It would royally suck to need something inspected later on, such as when selling a house, only to be told it wasn't code and had to come out or be expensively upgraded to meet code. I've done a ton of electrical work (some in conjunction with remodeling which was heavily inspected) and nobody said boo, but it was all code-compliant.

    And speaking of resale, even though a zoned hvac system would be nice, one that's more complicated than your grandma can operate will actually lower your resale value to most people since it will be seen as a maintenance liability. I put in a Honeywell 7 day programmable thermostat and my wife hated me for a couple of months until she figured out how to work it. I can only imagine what she would do with something that made one room cold and another warm without being totally obvious (like a 15" LCD touch screen with a floor plan of the house and car-type heat controls).

  21. History lesson by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1, Funny

    Most history books will tell you that the inventor of air conditioning was Willis Haviland Carrier. This is not true, as I can prove beyond all doubt.

    The air conditioner was actually invented by three Jewish gentlemen. Just look at the front of any air conditioner and read their names: Norm, Hi, and Max.

    1. Re:History lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, this is rated Score 0, Troll.

      Proof that Slashdot modders Just Don't Get It.

    2. Re:History lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because there's no moderation for -1, Unfunny

  22. No HVAC here, sorry. by small_dick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But my swamp cooler keeps the house cool and saves me a lot of money over my A/C cooled neighbors.

    Evaporative coolers use electricity only to spin the fan vs. compressing freon or whatnot, which takes a lot more energy.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
    1. Re:No HVAC here, sorry. by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 3, Informative
      When I lived in New Mexico, I set my swamp cooler on a timer to come on about half an hour before I got home. After working in the field some days in 90-100F heat, it was sure good to come home to a place that was just the right temperature. MUCH less expensive than refrigerated air, and the increase in humidity was welcome.

      In a somewhat related note, a little trick for those of you with swamp coolers. When you start them up for the first time in the spring, after you flush the system and scrape out the scale and dust, fill it with water and add half a cup of fabric softener to the reservoir. Makes the whole house smell clean. This may not sound like much to people who don't know swamp coolers, but for those that do- you know how bad they can stink after a winter of disuse!

    2. Re:No HVAC here, sorry. by ross.w · · Score: 1

      These are great if you live in a dry climate (Texas, Dubbo, Sahara Desert) but they aren't very good in a humid climate unless you put ice in them. That means that here in Sydney and in most coastal type areas they aren't usually very effective.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    3. Re:No HVAC here, sorry. by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Maybe some parts of Texas. But here by the Gulf (Houston area) we have constantly high humidity. Nobody around here has a swamp cooler.

  23. $30 solution by Squeezer · · Score: 2, Redundant

    go to home depot, buy a $30 digital thermostat. install it yourself (its 3 wires for the heat/AC and a AA battery for the thermostat). program it so in the summer your AC is at 78 when you are home, 85 when you are at work, and in the winter, 68 when you are asleep and 72 when you are home). the digital thermostat will easily pay for itself in 1 month in the summer.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    1. Re:$30 solution by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      To save even more money, set your home to 85 when you're home, 95 when you're out in the summer, and 60 when you're asleep/64 otherwise in the winter. Man was not designed to live within a ten-degree window.

  24. Yes you do by nuggz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually I think you do have choice.

    Here you can buy from the government regulated electrical power grid. Or you can generate your own electricity. Solar cells, gas generators, waterfalls or whatever you want.
    But there is a reason most people don't do this, the utility price is easy, cost competative and reliable.

    I think rates aren't all that high, most people waste huge amounts of electricity. I read somewhere the average household in my area uses 750kWh/month, I just just over 300 kWh.

  25. Re:HVAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heating, Ventillation, Air Conditioning.

  26. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Kudos is deserved for a +5 first post.

  27. Before you do *any* of this stuff. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 5, Informative

    Insulate your house. Insulate your attic, insulate the walls, insulate the pipes and add secondary glazing. It's the cheapest and most effective thing you can do.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Before you do *any* of this stuff. by ender81b · · Score: 3, Informative

      Like most people you miss the single greatest point of heat loss for any house -- the windows. Get some decents windows people!

      Now, if you are me, you live in a apartment located partway underground and you love mother earth. Thanks to being mostly underground my heating/cooling bills are 1/3 of my upstairs friends. Viva La Basments!

    2. Re:Before you do *any* of this stuff. by rmpotter · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... forgot "the windows", eh? You should look up the meaning of glazing in the parent post. Then all will be clear to you ;-)

      --
      Is this sig nificant?
    3. Re:Before you do *any* of this stuff. by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Ummm...glazing is windows. What do they teach in the schools these days?

  28. No dampers here by certsoft · · Score: 4, Informative
    But I did split the house into three "psuedo zones". There are temperature sensors in three areas, only one of which is used to control the central heating/cooling at any one time. This keeps the occupied area pretty close in temperature, while the un-occupied areas have less control.

    Not as good as using dampers, but much simpler. I put a copy of the webpage for this system on my website:
    System_Hvac

  29. My fundamental problem with HVAC... by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

    If it doesn't suck, it blows.

  30. RHVAC by rholliday · · Score: 3, Informative

    My father owns an HVAC company, and he uses a program called RHVAC to run loads of new and replacement installs, and gives the full report to the customer before they purchase. So not all companies are that bad. :)

    --
    Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
  31. yeah, but a kernel panic would be a bitch.... by chrisopherpace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like a pretty cool idea, and cheap. From reading the site, its definetely cheap. Somewhere around $20/room for tempature controls/etc. I just don't like the idea of it being computer-controlled, in areas like where I live, it would suck if the controller crashed, and it was -40 out. Frozen pipes/kitty cats.

    1. Re:yeah, but a kernel panic would be a bitch.... by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      I didn't get too far in to the site, but for systems like this there are usually failsafe modes that open all the dampers and allow full control to a "master" thermostat that runs like a normal system if the computer/controller loses power or crashes.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:yeah, but a kernel panic would be a bitch.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually run my underfloor heating from a old (networked) p200 laptop with a blown lcd screen, running linux, the FUSE userspace filesystem and a ibutton link controller, a homebuilt parallel port relay controller controls 24vac to the solenoid valves for each room and it sits in a little control loop maintaining temps for each room for the desired temp for that hour.
      I kind of worried about crashes, but Im glad to say, since I left the system running in jan to work away and left it in the care of my wife (who is NOT *nixy), that its only gone down once, and that was due to a power outage that lasted 9 hrs and drained the battery. I can ssh in remote and take a look and make sure alls well for peace of mind. My wife goes in and sets the temps for each room using a hacky gui I made for it running under apache/php, and she's really happy, so happy she's okay'd the computer controlled bath (think jacuzzi, solenoid remote taps/waste, canned mp3's). Sometimes you have to have a little faith in your own workmanship you know ;)
      Weve got similar stuff working the X10 stuff too, and I have to say that since we junked all the windows software and rolled our own gui linuxy stuff against the usual backends, things have improved 110% there too...
      Be brave, do a bit of testing to satisfy yourself, then go for it!
      One day Ill make a website about it all, and host it on someone elses servers to avoid my house being ./'d !

  32. heating and cooling costs? by MakoStorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just do what I do. Gorge and eat as much as you can in the summer, turn the thermostat to 60 in the winter and sleep for 6 months.

    Works for bears, works for me.

    1. Re:heating and cooling costs? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm a cold-freak. I don't turn on any of the heaters in my apartment and just wear socks on my feet to keep them from getting too cold, or wrap up in a blanket. The heat from downstairs is enough to keep things above freezing. :) Of course, I also wear shorts year round... (Mid-Winter electric bill: $38).

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:heating and cooling costs? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 1

      Winter isn't over yet.

      Get back in your cave.

  33. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking Nazi piece of shit.

  34. Re:Two concerns: Resale and housing code by Junta · · Score: 2, Informative

    From looking at their site, I would say if it subtracts value or decreases resale value, you can likely undo all your hardware changes in a couple of hours at no cost (servos on the actual vents, wiring in the duct system, no extra cutting, drilling, or equipment in inconvenient places.) While the solution is suboptimal (as they say, vent-placed equipment is not perfect), it is cheap and easily reversible in case you worry about that.

    Now as to the usability, it appears there is a current problem there with respect to the common user. However, once invested in the hardware and if you have a decent head for development, the system seems that it has a great potential for being amazingly simple (I have not looked at the code myself) to tack on a custom designed GUI with your touchscreen in mind. Of course, embedding a significant flat panel in the wall is not so reversible as the cheap approach ;)

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  35. Only 200? by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And that's for a business? Now you understand what the whole ruckus was about in CA, back in 2001.

    My home electric bill is roughly $200 (The water is also about $200). And that's LA DWP, which was a damn sight better than the poor fools who got 10x rate increases during the crunch.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  36. It's not the heat, it is the humidity (honest) by Latent+Heat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The air conditioning load is made up of 1) sensible heat (the kind you measure with a thermometer) and 2) latent heat (the kind that makes you feel hot and sticky and mutter "it's not the heat, it's the humidity." The latent heat is the difference in enthalpy (internal energy at constant pressure) between water in the vapor and liquid states (listed in steam tables). When you cool air, you condense water, and the latent heat given off has to be carried away by the air conditioner coils.

    The sensible heat load is the outside temperature seeping through the walls, but it is also the sum beating down on the roof and walls and pouring through windows. The latent heat load is largely the result of air infiltration with some contribution from showers and cooking: running a dryer contributes to latent heat because it pulls 150 CFM of inside air through the dryer vent that gets made up by air seeping in.

    One of the points made was that in fall in Florida, the air conditioner runs less so the indoor humidity climbs to the sticky range. They are recommending a variable speed air handler so that a low flow setting, the air gets chilled more so more of the AC goes into humidity removal. Heat pipes have been recommended as well -- to pre-chill the air handler input and pre-warm the output to trade less cooling for more condensing.

    Other approaches include not running your fan in continuous mode because that just evaporates the moisture film on the coils every time the AC cycles off to better draining cooling coil pans.

    But a fundamental problem is that the latent heat load is pretty much constant across the day while the sensible load varies with the sun and contributes to the big electrical peak. One idea is to paint the roof with titanium white to cut down on the sensible heat load.

    The idea I have is to try to smooth out the electrical peak load by letting the AC run more at night and run a little less during the day, and to let the sensible-heat temperature cycle up and down during the day, but to have some combined measure of heat and humidity remain constant. Instead of maintaining a constant temperature to try to maintain a constant indoor dewpoint.

    This system would 1) have it cooler at night to make sleeping easier -- I can stand it warmer during the day, 2) smooth out electrical peak demand, 3) more efficiently remove humidity averaged on a 24 hour basis because humidity removal efficiency goes down if the AC duty cycle goes up during the day and you are pulling the indoor humidity below 50 percent.

    Carrier makes a rather expensive ($200 plus) Humidistat product that controls the AC to both temperature and humidity targets. A cheaper solution for me is to use a setback thermometer which lets the temps go down at night and go up during the day, and to only start lowering temps at sleep time. A typical setback unit has night, wake, day, and return times -- I may go for 75 night, 74 wake, 77 day, and 78 return (the thermal pulse from the sun shining all day makes it through the house by evening, and at 78 the AC will be cycling to lower the humidity anyway). I also use an electronic humidity gauge and dial all those temps up or down a degree or two to get about 50 percent RH).

  37. what about the enviroment??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who gives a toss about the $200 bill... think of what your doing to the enviroment!!!

  38. Re:Throw that shit away. by U.I.D+754625 · · Score: 0

    You are right, humans have existed for thousands of years and we've only had home AC for less than 100 years now, right? The only reason I'm using heat this winter in New England is to keep the water running, so a 40 degree thermostat setting is fine. AC in the summer? Hahaha. Right. The parent isn't flamebait, it's just a damn good solution.

    --


    //Blessed are they that run around in circles, for they shall be known as wheels.
  39. Dupe... by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 1

    If it was on Slashdot 2 years ago, does it still count as a dupe?

  40. Re:HVAC? by T-Kir · · Score: 1

    Ummmm, Hoover VAcuum Cleaner! Yes, that's it! Not that I'm advertising them or anything (although I use Dyson myself).

    ;-)

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  41. Solar thermal systems work in cloudy conditions by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    They have to in the UK. The vacuum tubes used in domestic installations these days are around 80% efficient at collecting solar energy and converting it into heat, about 1kW/m^2 here, more as you get closer to the equator and less through winter.

    You simply size the system to provide the amount of heat you want at the time of year you want, the heat is stored in a water tank until required. Solar thermal systems are quite a bit cheaper to implement than photovoltaic.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  42. Re:HVAC Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioni by Totto · · Score: 5, Funny

    > for non-eXtreme geeks like myself, HVAC stands for Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioning.

    And for the rest of us, it stands for High Voltage AC. Though that's usually fairly darwinistic as a DIY-project.

  43. Re:HVAC Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High Voltage Alternating Current

  44. MOD GRANDPARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deutschland Uber Alles!

    1. Re:MOD GRANDPARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, I had a bunch of fun replying to this ethnocentric moron. Not one word of which I'm going to publish here.


      So, where were the flamebait modders when they were needed?

  45. Re:Throw that shit away. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    Humans also existed for a long time before indoor plumbing, so you could just get rid of that too. Then you won't even have any pipes that could freeze and no need for heat at all. The rest of us, however, prefer to live in the 21st century.

  46. bad programing by bluGill · · Score: 2, Informative

    That is a cheap solution that will for for some. However your temperature settings are wrong.

    When you are at home in summer, set the thermostat to 85, or 2 degrees below the outdoor temperature. You do not need it any colder, you body can handle high temperatures just fine. (There are exceptions, but those folks are under doctors care often anyway) When humidity gets to you, lower the thermostat just enough to get some of it out of the air.

    In winter your pipes need heat more than you do. Invest in a few sweaters. When you have guests raise the temperature to 68. When you are sick set the thermostat above 68 if it makes you more comfortable. Set it to 62 when you are sleeping, invest in some blankets if this seems cold. I keep my thermostat at 60 in winter, no matter what, and I'd go colder but the thermostat is upstairs, and I don't want to chance my pipes freezing.

    Check with your utility before doing anything though. Mine offers a discounted energy rate (off-peak) if I let them control the AC. I need to leave the AC on my at home temperature all day, because when I get home they normally hit peak loads, and so are most likely to turn my unit off. (This sounds bad, but in practice you never notice it, other than lower utility bills despite having a cool house all the time). They have a similar program for heat, but I have gas heat so I don't pay attention

    1. Re:bad programing by Darmox · · Score: 0
      In winter your pipes need heat more than you do. Invest in a few sweaters. When you have guests raise the temperature to 68. When you are sick set the thermostat above 68 if it makes you more comfortable. Set it to 62 when you are sleeping, invest in some blankets if this seems cold. I keep my thermostat at 60 in winter, no matter what, and I'd go colder but the thermostat is upstairs, and I don't want to chance my pipes freezing.


      In my house, we made it until November 8th this past year before we turned the heat on at all(in southwest Michigan.) The pipes won't freeze until it gets quite a lot cooler, and especially not if you are running water occasionally. The thermostat got *just* under 50, and I could see my breath pretty often.

      It's just a matter of Gumption:)

      (Although, now, the heater stays set at around 62 most of the time.)
      --
      If I was that drunk, I would have remembered it -- H. Simpson
    2. Re:bad programing by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you come live here. We'll see how long you last with the thermostat set at 102.

      Fuck the heat. That's why I have opposable thumbs: So I can obtain tools that make my environment suit me.

      I will happily sleep in a room that's about 40 degrees, though.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:bad programing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      However your temperature settings are wrong. When you are at home in summer, set the thermostat to 85, or 2 degrees below the outdoor temperature. You do not need it any colder, you body can handle high temperatures just fine.

      You are the one whose temperature numbers are wrong if you think everyone lives in a location where the high temperature in the summer is 85F! I'm sorry, on days when the ambient temperature is 108F, 2 degrees below the ambient temperature is 106F, and your body really cannot handle temperatures above 100F just fine. Eventually, the evaporation of sweat is simply insufficient to keep your body temperature at 98.6F.

      Also, if you read the web site that the story is about, you'll see that the reason the project was started is that the author lives in a 3-story house where the temperature can very between rooms as much as 10F. This is inefficient no matter what you set the thermostat to. The point is to cool and heat the house evenly, so that you are not cooling one room unnecessarily just to get other rooms to a comfortable temperature.

    4. Re:bad programing by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should have said "the lesser of" 85f, or 2 degrees below the outside tempature. I thought that was obvious.

      That said, yes the body can handle tempatures of 120F just fine, I know people who have done it. They drink a lot of water, and are amused by people like you who think it can't be done. They also adopt with things like afternoon naps so they can work in the cooler part of the day.

  47. Re:Throw that shit away. by U.I.D+754625 · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but what will you say in 2000 years?

    Humans also existed for a long time before ass washing slave monkeys, so you could just get rid of those too. Then you won't even have any monkeys that could freeze to death and no need for heat at all. The rest of us, however, prefer to live in the 78th century.

    --


    //Blessed are they that run around in circles, for they shall be known as wheels.
  48. Re:HVAC Heating, Ventilation, & Air Conditioni by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    You mean it's not high vacuum, like inside a CRT?

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  49. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    What the fuck does this post mean? I've read it twice, now three times. I'm going to read it several more times before the end of this comment probably. Without support for the technologies that the spec requires - What spec? Going forward - What's going forward? The support? What does 'go forward' mean in the context of support for technologies required by this nonexistent specification? And uh, so what if your specifications are out of date? Technology from the 1980s still works. Does any of this mean anything at all?

    Nothing done on the page is difficult. There are some servos attached to some register vents such that they can be opened or closed. Typically one would connect each servo to a small microcontroller such as a PIC chip, to provide communications. A simple network protocol using (for example) RS-422 serial over a pair of copper will provide low cost power and communication. (Two pair of cat3 or cat5, 5v power on one pair and data on the other.) Provided everything is centrally connected a simple scheme like this will work without any real trouble and is not at all complicated. You could hire someone good with electronics to do such a thing for you on contract very reasonably.

    You could do it even easier by using hardware which has servo control and serial communications built in already, and you only need write the software to structure the communications, with the dirty work handled for you. It's a lot cheaper to do it with the PIC chips though, they'll only need (at most) a few caps and maybe a voltage regulator on them, so they can handle the voltage drop of having a bunch of them on the same wire.

    It would probably only cost you about $50 per device (register, or whatever, you can obviously control a lot more than vents with a scheme like this) to do it wirelessly, and digitally. If you don't mind either spending more money or accepting a low number of commands per second (which might be annoying while tuning the system) you can encrypt all of the traffic as well. Using EEPROM PICs you can even do upgrades over the wire if you get chips with enough storage and write your software carefully.

    Anyway, wtf are you talking about dude?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  50. Out of date by avi4now · · Score: 1

    This site mentions that some parts may be introduced in May 2003. There are also some 404 links.

    Why is this considered news?

    Also, for someone new to the site, the organization is lacking. I found myself frustrated and unable to find what I wanted.

    1. Re:Out of date by vthome · · Score: 1
      Sorry, dude. I was busy making the system work, and neglected the site. By the way, if I knew what you wanted, I'd be more than happy to give it to you - all you have to do is *ask*.

      Here: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=52647

  51. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check the 2/29 project news page.

    The 'industry' is moving towards a certain goal (UPnP being the big item). This project is moving towards a different goal because it is not based upon the industry standards.

    By setting up the system according to the guidelines of the SourceForge project, you risk installing a system which you will have to maintain yourself if something significant malfunctions because your system is not built according to the industry standards.

    Please RTFWebsite before you start spouting off.

  52. A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by almaon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a fairly paltry income, I was willing to do anything to cut back on expenses to make my daily life a little easier to live.

    Started with the electric bill, did the obvious things, knocked the thermostat in a direction that'd keep the costs down. Replaced all the bulbs in the house with florecents. Switched to more energy effecient devices and appliances. It helped, but didn't make a real dent. My problem was heating and cooling. I live in a location with all the seasons. Very hot, very cold.

    Then a co-worker inspired an idea. He faught in Viet Nam, told me bout how the guys rotated back to the world and stopped in Hawaii for refueling. All the guys in combat were so used to the hot humid jungle that the 88F weather of Hawaii was just too cold for them, they all had on leather jackets trying to beat the chill.

    It was then I realized, that to a degree, my battles with TVA were more easily won by conditioning. All these years I had been spoiled by AC and electric heat. So I did a little experiment this Winter.

    I vowed never to turn on the heat unless there was a chance that the pipes might freeze. Went and bought a coleman sleeping bag and a bunkbed at a thriftstore, kept myself closer to the cieling and snuggly in my sleeping bag. Kept very warm at night, during the day I'd burn a few candles just to take the chill out of the room, wore long sleaves.

    My electric bill went from 270$ a month to around 30$.

    Success through suffering. But the experiment worked, now I can run around in shorts when it's 38F out and it's not big deal to me.

    How will I fair during the Summer tho? Many people die in the South from heat stroke, so I'm a little concerned about that. I really don't wanna die or get sick to save a dollar. So I think I'm going to do some zone cooling, reasonable AC set on 80 and lots of fans.

    The methods illustrated in the story would have been tempting, but I'm a renter. Not a whole like I can apply to the living structure without violating my lease and being homeless where it's gonna be really cold out.

    1. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I speak for the rest of us when I say: you are an idiot.

      (and I mean that in a brotherly, "I respect your willpower but no way am I freezing / living in a bag for a few hundred bucks" kind of way)

    2. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The only problem is in my experience, air conditioning costs are far higher than any heating costs. Our electricity bills are 500 AUD/quarter with an air conditioner, $300/quarter during this summer with no air conditioner. (The rest I can blame on the computers.) In addition to this, I'm hoping the computers do enough heating to avoid having to turn on any actual heaters during winter.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it is a matter of what you get use to. I grew up in Southern Wisc/Northern Ill. During the 70's, we had times for several weeks, the temp never got above -20F (I remember one week, where the temp never got above -35F). I did not mind it one iota. Later, I would run around with a windbreaker when the outside temp was 20F.

      Then I moved to Colorado in 1979. After being here for 2 years, I went back for a middle of winter visit with an ex-girlfriend. I dicided to walk up the road to where she was working, after all I grew up with -38F, still had the same clothes, and it was only a 20 Minute walk. Well, I almost lost my ears for that little stunt (yes, they turned black due to severe frostbight and the docs waited for 1 week before deciding that they did not have to go).

      That showed that anybody can get use to anything if they are exposed and acclaimate to it slowly. Several seasons will help. Personally though, I would turn on the heat. You will find it easier to deal with others.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Started with the electric bill, did the obvious things, knocked the thermostat in a direction that'd keep the costs down. Replaced all the bulbs in the house with florecents. Switched to more energy effecient devices and appliances.

      Other things to try:
      • keep all your interior doors closed, and close the heating/cooling vents in unused rooms (but don't close more than 50-70% of the vents - see the web site's info about static pressure)
      • if you have large rooms, or rooms with no doors between them, hang sheets or blankets from the ceiling to create separate heating/cooling areas (in a small enough area, a TV or computer may provide enough heat in the winter)
      • lower the temperature on your water heater - it doesn't need to be scalding hot, it just needs to be warm enough so you can have a comfortable shower
    5. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by freeweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has EVERYTHING to do with what you're used to. The simple fact is, there is no one correct temperature, and not everyone is comfortable living in extremes of either heat or cold.

      I live in a climate known to have some of the greatest temperature variations on the planet. -40C in the winter, +40C (and humid) in the summer. Yes, Alaska is colder, and yes, Florida is much, much warmer (especially when it's humid out). But it doesn't drop to -40 in Florida that often. Up here (central Canada, for those curious), you can always tell when people have just moved here, and from where. Mostly we get people from warmer climes, and they're the ones wearing scarfs and mitts when we're walking around in a T-shirt (this is pretty much any temperature above freezing during the spring).

      How's this relate to HVAC? Well, it's funny. We get roughly 2-3 months a year where the temperature is above "room" on average - that is, 20C/68F outside during the middle of the day. Yet, most new houses, and plenty of older ones, have central air. People who don't live here think we're crazy. There are really only a few weeks every summer where it's so hot that your house even warms up inside, and yet we spend a ton of cash on an A/C unit. Why?

      Well, our electricity is CHEAP. Mostly (all?) hydro-electric. But the biggest reason is our bodies. Let me tell you, living in this climate, you *really* notice heat. When it gets close to 30C outside, it's unpleasant. Add in the 60-70% humidity, and I can hardly move outside. When it gets in the high 30s (100F and up for the yanks), it's intolerable. Our bodies simply aren't used to the heat. After a few days of this, most people just seem to laze around. It becomes difficult to concentrate at work, and sleeping is well nigh impossible. There's also the sweating factor. I just don't do it. It's never warm enough for me to perspire much here, unless I'm doing some strenuous activity. But for a couple of weeks every summer, people start to smell, and not in the roses kind of way.

      I talk to people who live in places like Texas, Florida, Mexico.. and to them this is pretty much what it's like all the time (or at least most of the summer). They're used to it, and have adjusted. Of course, the thought of going for a walk at night when it's -25C outside is simply impossible to them :) All the talk in this story has been to the effect of "keep your thermostat at 85F and you'll save money". Sure, but I'd never sleep. I mean seriously. It doesn't cool down at night here like it does in dryer/higher places. If I'm not in a place with a basement, A/C is the only way to go.

      If you're used to sleeping in 85F, fine, but not for me. If you enjoy sweating all the time, hey, that's your perogative. But I gotta tell you, I enjoy creature comforts. You could also save a lot of money by living in a tent, sleeping on the ground, or washing in a local lake/river (assuming that's legal where you live). Sometimes money isn't the only reason to do something.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    6. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      lower the temperature on your water heater - it doesn't need to be scalding hot, it just needs to be warm enough so you can have a comfortable shower

      it also helps if it's warm enough not to be an ideal breeding ground for bacteria. think about what bacteria like: warm, moist environments. if you set your hot water heater's thermostat to 110F, you are giving them a nearly ideal environment.

    7. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How will I fair during the Summer tho? Many people die in the South from heat stroke, so I'm a little concerned about that. I really don't wanna die or get sick to save a dollar. So I think I'm going to do some zone cooling, reasonable AC set on 80 and lots of fans.

      If you really want to solve this problem, the best thing is to get down to the lowest body weight you can reach that is still healthy for your particular body. I'm 5' 9.5" tall, and when I was at around 140 lbs (or even lower), 80F was no problem for me at all. Pretty comfortable, in fact. I had electric bills of about $20 a month. These days, I'm at 170 lbs, and the heat really bothers me. My electric bills are more like $150 a month, although I do live in a larger place now than I did then and electricity is more expensive. But still...

    8. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think about what bacteria like: warm, moist environments. if you set your hot water heater's thermostat to 110F, you are giving them a nearly ideal environment.

      Except that the water supply has chlorine in it. Is there enough to stop bacteria from growing?

      This page has some useful info. It mentions 120F as the recommended (and minimum) temperature, saying anything less will have unintended consequences (it doesn't specifically mention bacteria).

    9. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Many people die in the South from heat stroke, so I'm a little concerned about that.

      That's something I've never really understood... Even in the hottest places on earth, all you need to do is poor a bucket of water over your head, and you'll feel cold for about an hour.

      Why people die of heat stroke in/around their homes, I'll never know.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      They were trying to save water, too! ;)
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    11. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Antarius · · Score: 1

      It could also be a case of "You get what you paid for..."

      Would it be fair to assume that you are basing your opinion on a brand reknowned for poor quality, power sucking performance like LG, Fujitsu, Samsung, Panasonic or even one of the million no-name brands that are currently being spouted out of China like diarrhoea? (Hint: note how many of them have the same model number)


      Air Conditioning is well known as being a highly efficient form of heating and cooling. (Geothermal is better, however!)

      In fact, a decent system will have a COP of 3 or more; I've even seen one brand (Toshiba, with their new R410A based systems) claiming a COP of 6! Carrier, before UTC turned them into something worse than LG, have claimed COP of 3+ for as long as I can remember.

      Then there are the new 'Inverter' models. Traditional systems draw around three times their operating current when they cut in. Inverter systems do away with this by not actually cutting out, but slowing the compressor's operation when cooling/heating capacity is not required.

      This not only consumes less power, but also gives a more stable temperature gradiant, as no dead-bands are needed. It's like comparing an analogue joystick to one of Atari's original digital ones. (Remember them? When things got dodgy, you could disassemble them and play directly on the pads.)

      Ducted Inverter systems are also available, and a correctly sized unit will be cheaper to run.

      A cheaper option to an Inverter system is to look at 3-phase. Some of the Aussie power companies are making it attractive to install 3-phase to run Air Conds. Once upon a time, you had to justify why you needed it (eg, Welding), and Air Conditioners were not a valid reason.

      3 Phase units will draw power from all 3 phases (which saves changing the name), which reduces the actually wattage per phase. Most power companies charge at the same tarriff as single-phase, so you effectively shave the running costs down by 60-70%.

      That said, I've got an older (single phase) Carrier ducted myself (before they were K-mart quality), with no particularly fascinating features. This last quarter, my bill was AUD$280 (down from $450) - which includes cooling a 4 bedroom house. I think that a large proportion of this saving was upgrading my 28 year old Kelvinator (still running) to a Liebherr (200kwh/year). And, before you compare tarriff's, South Australia's power is generally more expensive per kwh than Melbourne and Sydney.

      The most ineffecient appliances in my house are systems that generate heat with non Heat-Pump technologies. These are my vivarium (Ceramic Heat Emitters & standard filament bulbs) and a PC running an earlier Athlon. (I'm considering housing it in the vivarium to reclaim the heat, however I'm sure the humidity would not be a Good Thing(tm))


      Other indications that "Heat Pump" technologies are quite efficient are some of the new 'Heat Pump' hot water systems, where the condenser is used to heat water. (Some people retrofit their A/C to do this, however once their water is hot, their cooling capacity drops dramatically, and liquid refrigerant is piped back to the compressor. Not good for the valves... Also, it can only be taken advantage of during summer.)

      My favourite would be a clothes dryer that was once produced by AEG. It was a 6Kg dryer with a 6 star energy rating (earnt 7.9 on calculations), using a mere 130kwh/year. (By comparison, most brands use over 600kwh/year for a 3.5Kg dryer) Unfortunately, I didn't have a spare AUD$5,200 (Not a typo!) lying around while they were still producing them.


      So, if you have a ducted AC (and not a split system which you're unfairly trying to use to use to cool/heat more than a single room - they are a room air conditioner) and you're paying too much, then you either need to change brand, t/stat placement or introduce a zoning system like the one mentioned in the article. There's generally a reason why brands like LG are half of the price of a more reputable brand for a ducted system.

      FWIW, all of the good commercially-produced zoning systems that I can get my hands on, start at ~AUD$2K

    12. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Let's just say that changing brands isn't exactly an option unless the landlord happened to donate money for it.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    13. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Antarius · · Score: 1

      'nuff said.

      There are two types of landlords:

      1) The kind that value their tennants and view their rented premises as a long-term asset. and
      2) The kind that spend as little as possible, charge as much as they can get away with, and do token gestures such as put in cheap garbage appliances so that they can justify higher rent.

      The latter are notorious for putting in the cheapest, nastiest A/C's that they can find - and it is invariably undersized. ie, the old school 'wet the finger and guess that a 1 HP unit will do.(1)' Heat-loads, actual area size or insulation - let alone other contributing factors such as windows sizes, Northward facing walls/windows, roof style & colour etc.


      Alas, there's not much you can do in this situation - unless the machine is faulty.

      I recall somebody once putting a nail through the condenser in an obscure position, causing the refrigerant to leak out with great force and losing the oil. After running the compressor without oil for a while (which usually requires manually pushing the contactor) it soon burnt out. The point? Cheapies cost more to fix than they do to replace...Not suggesting anything here, though...


      (1)I won't even go into how much I hate people talking in HorsePower when it comes to Air Conditioners. The capacity of the motor is not the only bearing on the operation of the system - I have seen a '1.5 HP' system provide 3.2Kw heating capacity, while another brand was 1.5Kw. Big difference!

    14. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The property wasn't a dedicated "rental property", but one which the owner rented out for 6 months while they were living in another place. We got kicked out just as fast as we moved in.

      In our area (Marrickville) you can throw out the insulation aspect 90% of the time, because home owners get a grant to install soundproofing to block out the aircraft noise. Hence we had double-glazed windows with thick curtains which were left shut most of the time, and fairly good insulation.

      But we know the air condition was at least unmaintained. We had to get a guy to clean it out because every time it was turned on, the mouldy air caused people to get sick. It was probably an old unit, not so much a bar unit. *And*... the real estate guys were such assholes that we didn't get paid compensation for having the cleaning done. And that's how it always works with real estate. Assholes, the lot of them. One of the few fair generalisations in existence.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    15. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Antarius · · Score: 1

      I'm a real estate agent, you insensive clod!

      Well... Maybe not. I couldn't pass the ethics and morals test. (I had some.)

      Seriously, it sounds like you had a bum deal. Of course, don't tar all air conditioners with the same brush.

      All refrigerated A/Conds have return-air filters. These should be cleaned regularly; how regularly depends on use and the environment. At worst, I'd love to hear of people cleaning them monthly - it's when I hear "what filter?" that I feel like educating people with a sharp instrument.

      Usually the filters are washable, so open up the facia (or the return air vent on a ducted), pop the little bugger out and give it a rinse out under the tap. Let it dry and then throw it back in.

      This will not only improve air quality, but will increase efficiency as the air will get to the coils better. Never run a unit without the filter, otherwise you'll need some coil cleaner and an hour or two to spare.

      Other maintenance includes ensuring that the condenser (outdoor unit) is kept clean and unobstructed. These fellas get chock full of dust and crap and should be blown out regularly too. Also, ensure that the grasses/plants etc haven't grown into them!

      Finally, there are some cleaning products on the market that you can spray into the fancoil while it is running - it kills mould, mildew etc. It's called "Clean Air, Home & Office" IIRC.

      My favourite trick with ducteds is to get the cleaner "Vanilla Fridge Wipe" (ingredients: Water, Ethyl Alcohol, Ethyl Vanillin & Vanillin - sounds tasty!) and spray it below the return air box. It sucks up and gets distributed around the system - and makes the place smell nice. And being practically water & ethyl alcohol (which most true geeks are acquanted with), it's not a health hazard.

    16. Re:A nerdy approach that certainly outweighs mine by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      All refrigerated A/Conds have return-air filters. These should be cleaned regularly; how regularly depends on use and the environment. At worst, I'd love to hear of people cleaning them monthly

      This is where your head will spin. They said "look, here's a receipt for when we got it cleaned six months ago."

      Hahahahahahahaha. - sigh -

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  53. -1, Troll by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This whole submission is a sensationalist troll. "this sounds like a good solution for those who are getting screwed with outrageously high electric bills due to their HVAC unit". According to the article rates went up 7.4%, hardly a 'screwing'. Thus, if your bill was $200, that means it was $186.74 before, which means your "HVAC unit" (the definition left as an exercise to the reader) is pretty much shit anyway.
    How does this stuff make the front page, is the editorial staff of Slashdot the Socialist Worker's Party or something?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:-1, Troll by evilviper · · Score: 1
      According to the article rates went up 7.4%, hardly a 'screwing'.

      I can tell you that the rates in my area went up astronmically (California)...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  54. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    UPnP is absolutely the wrong direction to go. If it's DIY in the first place, you are ideally suited to maintain it yourself, and UPnP is insecure (as in, it makes no attempt at security) and unnecessarily complicated for such a simple task as this. It requires a web server and parsing XML, not to mention TCP/IP... It might make sense for a commercial product but it will be expensive, adding probably a good fifty bucks to each device. (You could use Lantronix XJack or XPort or wtfever it is for example.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  55. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by shokk · · Score: 1, Troll

    If only they weren't written in Java. Seriously, I'm buying a multizone heated home and had thought of this project, but forgotten that it was Java based. I would consider it more if it were a hardware product and since they talk about Embedded Java, that might be a possibility in the future. Until then I won't consider bogging my server down with it.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  56. Finally! by code+shady · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now i just need some soil moisture conent probes, and some light meter things, and i can finally have my computer controlled, uber-efficient closet marijuana garden!!

    ah, technology.

    --
    Look out honey cause I'm usin' technology
    Ain't got time to make no apologies
  57. Re:HVAC? by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

    Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning system.

    --
    -CowboyNick
  58. Buy a new fridge, and other suggestions. by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting
    May save some money, but most people's houses dont use more than 1500 kWa of electricity a month... ~140$ of electricty around here (considering we pay the "Berea College Utilities" tax). Now a worthy project would be covering your house with solar panels and breaking even on your utility bills ;).

    Actually, the single most worthy project would be simply buying a new refrigerator. They are the #1 electricity consumers in almost every household, because they run 24x7x365, and are never thrown out until they completely fail(after years of working below the already mediocre factory performance). Newer refrigerators are MUCH more efficient than those made 5, 10 years ago. There are even models that are so efficient, they can be run entirely off solar power.

    Wanna reduce your electric bill, but can't replace your fridge? Leave enough space behind it for airflow, and vacuum/dust the coils, especially those under the unit. Oh, and properly set the controls; buy a thermometer and adjust until both compartments are cold -enough-. The freezer control, by the way, doesn't control the freezer compartment temperature- it controls the RATIO of cooling between refrigerator and freezer compartments.

    All in all, even if you buy a new fridge, it could end up paying for itself in a year or two in saved electric costs. Oh, and slowly switch your lights over to fluorescent bulbs, wrap hot water pipes in foam insulation, put sealing inserts behind outlet plates+switchplates, etc. In the winter, cover windows in rooms you don't use with the window insulation you can buy at the hardware store. Find out the R-rating on the insulation in your walls, attic, etc; old insulation can be horrible compared to the latest new stuff(which can often be "blown" into place, install is a cinch). Got an old furnace? Get a new one; they're also a thousand times better these days. My folk's new gas furnace is so efficient, its exhaust is a 2" PVC pipe that is barely warm to the touch when it's going full blast...

    Last but not least, turn off the damn computer when you're not using it, get an ISP account with webspace instead of running your own webserver, etc. I worked it out once...100-200W over 24x7x365 equals a LOT of money per year!

    1. Re:Buy a new fridge, and other suggestions. by Doco · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just couldn't let this pass by -

      "I worked it out once...100-200W over 24x7x365 equals a LOT of money per year!"

      First - that math is for 7 years, it should be 24 x 7 x 52.179 or 24 x 365.25

      200W x 24hrs/day x 365.25days/year = 1753.2kW-hours / year.

      At a rate of $0.08/kW-hour = $140.

      Now - that is assuming that it is using the full 200W all the time. A 200W or 300W power supply is needed because there is a lot more power used when the disks are spinning up or that CD/DVD is spinning and writing. Even a more busy CPU and graphics card will draw significantly more power. So that box is probably drawing only a fraction of that power on average which means that it isn't really close to that much.

      Now if I could just find my clamp-on amp-meter to give some real power numbers on my own boxen.........

    2. Re:Buy a new fridge, and other suggestions. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      You would expect about 70W if there is no power savings, and the CRT is off.

    3. Re:Buy a new fridge, and other suggestions. by Antarius · · Score: 1

      I concur.

      I bought a Liebherr refrigerator a while back - the first thing I noticed (when I got over the power consumption - which was a paltry 200kwh per year) was the insulation. We're not talking the piddly 200mm of insulation that you're lucky to get with a fridge. We're talking "try and get your hands around this" thickness.

      That model has finished now, but I've been looking at newer ones on Liebherr's site, like this one. 182 kwh per year for a 413 litre fridge? That's an unbelievable difference!

    4. Re:Buy a new fridge, and other suggestions. by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Bah! As computer geeks, we should be willing to just accept the cost of powering our computers as a condition of our lifestyle. After all, its not like we're going to spend that money as readily on fancy cars or anything (which are a lot more expensive).

      I did some measurements a few months ago, and my rack of computer equipment has a continuous draw of around 1000W. That's the stuff that runs 24/7, and doesn't include monitors (which I do shut off when I'm not home). And guess what? Soon I'm planning on putting some more power hungry stuff into use, and that number will shoot up quite a bit.

      If you really care about power, though, I strongly recommend thin clients. I currently have a bunch of Sun Ray units (yes, they require Solaris/Sparc on the server, but they're just one example of a possible solution). These things use less power than a laptop, make no noise, and basically let you stick a "desktop setup" anywhere you can snake an ethernet connection to. So for the power draw of single decent desktop (I'm using a dual-proc Ultra 60, which has a 350W power supply and is quieter than the PC sitting next to it), you can have as many desktops as you feel able to share CPU power with.

  59. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that at some point in the future when some big, expensive component fails and you go to the HVAC store to pick up a new one, you may find yourself SOL because none of the new machines works with your DIY setup. Maintaining a set of wires and conduits is one thing. Trying to fix the main unit because no new units work in your DIY HVAC system is not a fate to look forward to.

  60. Re:Throw that shit away. by IamSorrow · · Score: 1

    You mis-understand here, what he is saying about AC and excessive heating is correct, humans have lived without it for a very long time and not suffered. Whereas indoor plumbing has improved the life expectancy of man, heating and cooling may help us live comfortably but overall it's a comfort thing not a health issue.

  61. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The main unit in this case can be a PC which uses devices not unlike the control units (except without servo control) and which have a power supply for the other devices, as an interface to the system. And, there are no big expensive components which are difficult to interface to because they are either on or off. Heating devices have a thermocouple which will provide a few mA of current to let you know when they are ready, you can pull that signal and then you just connect it through to another wire to turn on the heater. (I assume that AC is similar, though obviously not identical.) A thermostat is an amazingly simple device, especially electrically. Those devices will (at least internally but also externally) work like this basically forever because there is no reason for them not to.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  62. Zoning is about comfort as well... by Roonster · · Score: 1

    Personally I'm interested in adding something along these lines to increase the comfort in my home. I have a 1964 Built Side-split home, and the upper floor with bedrooms is always much warmer than the lower floor family room. This is a problem in the winter with heating and in the summer with cooling. The house has upgraded windows and attic insulation, but the temperature variations make it difficult to keep all levels of the house comfortable. Adding something along the lines of this project could really make a difference.

  63. HVAC? No, In Floor Heat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I bult my house I used Wirsbo(tm) tubing under the hardwood flooring upstairs, and in the concrete slab downstairs. It is set up with zones, digital, 7 day thermostats, etc. The floors are always warm, any backup heat is from a pellet stove. All DIY. It is very comfortable.
    The heat for the infloor system is from standard water heaters. Since the water heaters are downstairs, I don't need to turn on the thermostats for pump control - simple thermosiphon will cause the hot water to flow thru the system in the upper two stories.
    The system is simple and convenient. If power goes out I still have heat from thermosiphoning.
    It is possible top retrofit homes with this system, either with baseboard radiators or running the tubing between the joists (plus some drilling to get to each joist bay) as long as the crawl space is available.
    There are other companies besides Wirsbo that produce this type of heating system/product.
    When you are ready to build/buy your own house I recommend comparing HVAC and infloor heating. Look at "Fine Homebuilding" magazine for ads and articles, they are at the obvious web site.
    To make my heating system more viable I used foam insulation for R-50 in the walls and R-60 in the roof. Double paned windows and a 5 foot overhang to reduce summer heat gain (my outside walls are 11 feet high). If the are more than 8 people in the house at a time I need to turn all the heating off, as the heat thrown off by the bodies raises the inside temp.
    All in all a rather pleasant solution to the heating/cooling system.
    Since I live on the northern California coast I don't need cooling. Average year round temp is 55 degrees F.
    If you need cooling the system could be adapted for that. To cool the house you only need to cool the circulating water, a heat pump would the best solution.

    1. Re:HVAC? No, In Floor Heat! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Radiant heating's other benefit is that it doesn't take much energy to make the place feel warm.

      Be careful with radiant cooling, though; condensation is a bit of a pain if you are trying to really cool a significant load.

    2. Re:HVAC? No, In Floor Heat! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Thanks, when I buy a home later this year I will look into this. Using cheap natural gas for heat in a manner that won't kick up my asthma will be great and maybe I can use the yard as a heat sink for cooling during the summer (though lowering humidity is a major part of cooling around here so might still need the AC unit)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  64. Re:Two concerns: Resale and housing code by big+punkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A few months ago, I bailed on a seven-year stint as an active HVAC contractor in Florida; I love this project.

    But I am glad I don't have to answer the radio shout for help from the poor on-call technician who gets a look at this equipment for the first time at 0200 on a Sunday morning. If something breaks on a system like this, and the geek that built it is gone, then things will likely progress as you describe: The hardware changes will be undone in a few hours, returning the system to a state understood by the servicer, even if the problem is as simple as a mechanically broken servo link. Many of the HVAC techs working have trouble using their VOMs efficiently on the high voltage sections of the system. For these guys, controls are mysterious scary voodoo magic. For such a cool system to survive its inventor it'll need killer documentation, easy to find and comprehend, and hard to lose.

    The article mentions the Trane XV1500. We had a bunch under our care; they were wicked good air conditioners. They stopped making them because the average service tech was helpless to make them go when they broke, so they tore them apart and tried to make them work in a more simple way...which was not possible with those systems, as the compressor was a frequency-controlled DC motor. Much unhappiness for tech, for homeowner, for service company, for Trane. So now they make a condensing unit with two old fashioned compressors, and stage those. They still get butchered, but at least coldness can happen on an emergency call on the 4th of July weekend.

  65. Re:Throw that shit away. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    I'm not insulating the goddamned loft unless the landlord pays for it.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  66. Check out this week's "This Old House" by stryders · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to my schedule the episode of This Old House on PBS this week will show how in Bermuda it is standard practice to collect rainwater for all a house's water needs - in fact if a family uses too much water, they're forced to buy water from the government. Show info here shows up to last week's episode: This Old House

    1. Re:Check out this week's "This Old House" by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's why the houses there are such bright light colors, so you can tell easily if there is something nasty on your roof.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  67. Gray-Water Toilets! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    directly tie-in to the temperature zoning system featured in this Slashdot posting.

    The temperature controller is an *excellent* idea, I think I'll take a look at incorporating it into my house.

    Here's my little (non-computerized) ecological project: a gray water toilet which recycles water from my washing machine.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Gray-Water Toilets! by Unoti · · Score: 1

      If I have gray water toilets, how are the dogs and cats in my house supposed to get water!

    2. Re:Gray-Water Toilets! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

      If I have gray water toilets, how are the dogs and cats in my house supposed to get water!

      Using the bowl of clean water you provide.

      My cat was never a toilet-drinker anyway, but the gray water really did surprise my buddy's dog the first time it came over.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    3. Re:Gray-Water Toilets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your nick is "BigBlockMopar" and you're talking about ecological projects? How about burning your car, chrysler has a long history of making the least fuel effecient and most highly polluting engines on the market, and you evidently have a big one.. ;)

  68. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Come on, a cheap mini-itx with a decent processor can be put together for less than the cost of a simple digital thermostat, let alone one as complex as a multizone controller.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  69. Re:Throw that shit away. by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    Plumbing! It's the lastest invention! It allows water to flow from one place to another. Pipe the shit right out of your house! Plumbing!

  70. Gray Water Toilet - pictures and info! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Would there be anything wrong with using your shower water as toilet water? I honestly can't see anything wrong with that and it'd certainly cut down on somebody's water bill from month to month.

    I meant to reply here rather than my post in the previous parent, I clicked on the link and brainfarted about the subject.

    My toilet costs me about $200/year to flush (based on number of flushes per day counted for a typical week, and the size of the toilet's tank). So I built a system to refill it using water from my washing machine.

    I did also consider using the water from the shower, but in practice, the water from the washing machine provides enough water to keep the storage barrel full.

    Whether you have one or several toilets, the number of flushes per day is probably proportional to the number of people in the house. Since the laundry usage is also proportional to the number of people in the house, the water barrel is likely to remain full, but I'm sure there'd be no harm in dropping a pipe off the clean-out port at the bottom of the bathtub/shower U-trap, putting in another U-trap to serve as a vapor barrier, and draining that into the barrel. A couple of barrels should probably also be paralleled for a high-volume multiple toilet installation, but if you store too much water, it will start to grow (stinky) algae.

    I tried paralleling barrels, but in practice, I didn't need to - just two people in my house. It'd be very easy to do, just a hose connecting fittings near the bottoms of each barrel, and they'll reach an equilibrium even if it's several minutes after the washing machine has finished a drain cycle.

    As for what's wrong with gray water toilets, I don't know. I know it's against building codes here, but I don't know why. My system, not being a permanent installation or requiring any modification to the existing plumbing, skirts the rules about building codes.

    I have yet to find a single disadvantage to my gray water system.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Gray Water Toilet - pictures and info! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Fuck building codes. If you're saving the town money (if more people use more water, they need a new water treatment center), they should at least make it legal to do so. Also, who the fuck decided that they can tell you what you can do to your own house? If I want to do a shitty job (haha) installing a toilet, that's my right. It's my toilet and my house. If banks or insurers want to make rules, fine. It's technically their house. But it is NOT the government's house!!

      What's next? Computer code? "You can only overclock your computer by 500MHz on Tuesdays and you must have 4.8 fans per gigaflop."

      Fuck you. My stuff, my rules. Who lets shit like building codes fuck our society?

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Gray Water Toilet - pictures and info! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fuck you. My stuff, my rules. Who lets shit like building codes fuck our society?

      Well, yeah. I'm quite a Libertarian, but unfortunately this is just one of those things where there have to be government-enforced standards. (You're certainly not going to trust contractors to do the right thing, are you?)

      Why are building codes important? Look at fire and earthquake damage in third-world countries like Taiwan and Iran... 300 people die in department store fire in Taipei... Notice that sort of stuff doesn't happen in the US, Canada, EU or Australia very often?

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    3. Re:Gray Water Toilet - pictures and info! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to trust the contractors. They are checked by building inspectors, or an informed consumer.

    4. Re:Gray Water Toilet - pictures and info! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me just say...

      You, to me, are an intelligent environmentalist.

      Trust me, for those that know me, that is one high compliment. Don't take it lightly. :-)

    5. Re:Gray Water Toilet - pictures and info! by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Fuck building codes. If you're saving the town money (if more people use more water, they need a new water treatment center), they should at least make it legal to do so. Also, who the fuck decided that they can tell you what you can do to your own house? If I want to do a shitty job (haha) installing a toilet, that's my right. It's my toilet and my house. If banks or insurers want to make rules, fine. It's technically their house. But it is NOT the government's house!!

      If someone's do-it-yourself blackwater reclamation system malfunctions, you could get an outbreak of something like e. coli or cholera that can wipe out an entire town.

      We're spoiled by our clean water supplies. It used to be that one of the leading causes of death was water-borne illnesses. Now, diseases like cholera and dysentery are just names, if that.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  71. HVAC is too expensive! So we went for swampies. by zardie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Over the past few years, we've had to replace our 20 year old central heating system (as our old one died) and recently, we've had cooling installed in the house.

    Originally, we investigated the possibility of going for an HVAC reverse-cycle capable system but the running costs, along with the prohibitive installation costs were from Mars, or something. They wanted "only" AU$3000 for install of the three phase, plus it was about ten grand for the system and installation.

    Installing split-system wall units was also an idea, however, cold air doesn't easily move throughout the house due to airflow being restricted so you'd realistically want units in every room. All of a sudden, Carrier's centrally airconditioned system doesn't look too bad.

    In the end, we went with two evaporative coolers from a company called Brivis (Australian). These units are self-cleaning and self-maintained, too, so we don't have to dash up on the roof every six months. Our heating system is also from the same company and was the most efficient on the market when we had it installed.

    Now, the nifty thing is that our wall controllers have backlight LCD displays and use RS232 (or 422 - I can't remember but I know that it was standard) for communication, so it should be easy to, say, hook one up to a PC if I really wanted to, although these AU$200 wall controllers have been installed in factory environments with 12 coolers in them. On one controller.

    And because the installers of the cooling were slack (we should be able to have both coolers AND the heater on the ONE controller) and didn't want to run cables under the house, they installed seperate controllers for each cooler. So I've got one to play with if I felt like running some cables.

    So how is it? Cheap to run, but be warned that evaporative coolers are better when you start them in the morning before it gets hot - the ideas is to cool the air by moving a lot of it. Windows need to be kept open to allow the airflow to occur or else things get very humid. And on a reasonable day, I've had the coolers bring the temperature from 38C down to a comfortable 21C.

    But as other people have observed, these coolers become ineffective on humid days - we had a day with 80% relative humidity where the temp came down from 40C to about 32C - still a change, but it was still hellishly humid inside.

    I'd love real HVAC cooling. It's dry, quiet and I can keep all the doors and windows closed, however it costs a fortune to install and a fortune to run.

    Also, most HVAC systems had zoning as a feature. Heck, my heating has zoning built-in. I don't see what all the fuss is about.

    1. Re:HVAC is too expensive! So we went for swampies. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      These units are self-cleaning and self-maintained, too, so we don't have to dash up on the roof every six months.

      I have a self-cleaning swamp cooler myself, and I can guarantee that you will be going up to clean it out at least once every 3 months (unless you don't mind the strong smell of bacteria).

      Besides, you really need to go up there twice a year anyhow, if just to cover the unit when it gets cold (and uncover it when it warms up again).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  72. Openess in Controls Industry by tc9 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Begining to change - a number of these industries are moving into SOAP, with such niche languages as CSML (Control System ML) and legacy-extenders such as Bacnet/XML and LON/XML creeping into the market

    Check out the Continental Automated Building Association (CABA) a consortium of companies now working on OBIX, (Open Building Information eXchange) whose mission is to expose the API's or Building Automation Systems (HVAC, Access Control, Security, even X10 is on board) under a common XML schema.

    Somewhere out there is a White Box ML, for interfaces to Refrigerators, Washing Machines, Dryers, etc. This effort is an extension of the earlier UPNP (Universal Plug and Play) work done earlier than SOAP was around for interfaces to consumer electronics, computing, home automation, home security, appliances, printing, photography, computer networking, and mobile products.

    SOAP is also creeping onto electric meters (see Power Measurement's ION line, some of the GE product lines) although these are still priced more for the industrial solution. Eaton Electric's Cutler-Hammer is even selling a SOAP-enabled Power Panel (you know, the grey box with circuit breakers in your back room)

    The IAI, the engineering standards group, is working the issue from the other end, developping top-down standards drilling down to meet OBIX coming up, most notably in Green Building XML (GBXML) which has a lovely schema. Major CADD companies such as Autodesk, Bentley, and Intergraph have committed to support GBXML in their tools when modelling is used for design.

    There is going to be a lot more of this in the future, and SOAP is going to be the ticket.

  73. Arc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose they meant Ark, but still... trying to come up with a catchy saying, you should try to spell things right.

  74. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by vthome · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not a professor, for better or worse :) That's a different guy you're thinking about.

  75. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by vthome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Time, time, time. DIY Zoning is modular, and in the very beginning I hoped that TINI (that runs native Java) will be able to host one of the modules. Alas, never had time nor chance to get my hands on it. Still, thinking about rewriting the project in C++, after all the architectural things are done.

  76. plumbing by cjsteele · · Score: 1

    coincidentally, I spent the weekend plumbing in my washer and dryer... It wasn't tough -- a bit time consuming, but not technically challenging or overly difficult.

    I would encourage everyone to do their own home-repairs, but that's just me.

    -C

    --
    "This above all, to thine own self be true" :x!
  77. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by vthome · · Score: 1

    I may agree about UPnP - I've just started thinking about it last night. What other alternatives would you suggest? Jini is DOA, and it's too heavy anyway, and there's nothing else out there, really. However, experience shows that the damned *difficulty of configuration* is the major showstopper for this project.

    Any insights would be much welcome.

  78. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by jrockway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Java can be compiled to native code. Why would you rewrite something just to change the language!?

    --
    My other car is first.
  79. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by shokk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've considered that, but you are ignoring the most expensive part of all that: my personal time in setting that up and getting it balanced out to where my family and I find it usable. It is the difference between a TiVo and MythTV: where I am concerned I would choose the latter, but because my family gets put into the equation I go with the former. Could I have gone with a Radio Shack learning remote? Sure, but throw my then-6-year-old into the mix and I went for the Pronto so that they don't have to remember "AUX1 is for this, but you have to hit AUX2 anbd power after that." I don't want the family to have to reboot the system because they're friggin freezing and some stupid patch hasn't been put up on a site yet. Besides, a lot of the digital thermostats from sites like SmartHome integrate into MisterHouse which runs on Perl and doesn't bog my server down. Best of both worlds.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  80. Oh my God, that's cheap power by HPNpilot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Con Ed in New York is about 3 times that. The little tables on energy efficient bulbs doesn't even go as high as our electric rates.

    Energy efficiency is very important here and would have a great payback period, except that unless you do it entirely yourself the contractors will make you pay through the nose. The state makes various "barriers to entry" such as several layers of licensing so tradespeople's hourly rates for jobs of that kind of size are comparable to lawyers and doctors (I am not kidding).

    When it gets hot here it is frequently very humid and this takes even more energy to cool. My worst computer failure was one summer when I was out, the air conditioner tripped off, and the room where I had my system got to 130 degrees. The complete failure and subsequent head crash of the disk was made serious by the failure of the backup system to make usable tapes for the past month.

  81. Re:Two concerns: Resale and housing code by vthome · · Score: 1

    Yes, there *is* a usability problem. Mostly because I am (stand corrected, *was*) happy with the way it worked.

    What kills it is the lack of feedback. People see this stuff, start reading the docs on the site, and by the page ten they fall asleep or get scared and go away. And I never find out *what* scared them away.

    Sure the site needs redesign, as well as GUI, but damn it, where do I get *time*???

    Now, a touchscreen was *definitely* thought of :) Take a look at the code, you'll like it :)

  82. DIY Waste of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh, it's clear "nerds" don't know anything about houses or homebuilding.

    a) Zoning is much less efficient if you have an open staircase (your upstairs is always warmer than the downstairs, but it's possible to use this to your advantage in opposite seasons - cool basement in summer, warm upstairs in winter). It's also not very useful if you have an unfinished basement and your zones are upstairs/downstairs.

    b) Yeah, you can crank your house up to 85F while you're away at work in the summer, and down to 55F while you're away at work in the winter. Ask yourself this question: is it cheaper to maintain a relatively constant temperature, or is it cheaper to let the house settle up and the work the hell out of the AC or furnace to get it back to a comfortable temperature?

    c) Horizonal zoning works. You can also achieve the same effect for free by manually adjusting the registers in rooms or areas that are normally unoccupied.

    1. Re:DIY Waste of Money by sidetrack · · Score: 1

      re b) - It's cheaper to let the house "settle up" - since less energy is used over all. You will also be putty your heating/cooling system through fewer cycles (as well as less overall work), and thus wearing it *less*, not more.

      BTW, I'm in the process of installing this system, and it looks good so far (only one zone on at the moment tho').

    2. Re:DIY Waste of Money by vthome · · Score: 1

      b) Yeah, you can crank your house up to 85F while you're away at work in the summer, and down to 55F while you're away at work in the winter. Ask yourself this question: is it cheaper to maintain a relatively constant temperature, or is it cheaper to let the house settle up and the work the hell out of the AC or furnace to get it back to a comfortable temperature?


      I'm too lazy to ponder about that. I'll let the computer figure it out.


      c) Horizonal zoning works. You can also achieve the same effect for free by manually adjusting the registers in rooms or areas that are normally unoccupied.


      Horizontal zoning does indeed work, but if you want to shuffle the registers yourself all day long. As it says in the FAQ, the temperature balance in the house changes every second, depending on season, weather, wind, time of day, phase of moon and Philip Morris stock price.
  83. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by vthome · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm not sure this is a viable option. To be absolutely honest, I've never tried this, and if someone's got the time to show me how (or even better, to make the native compile an option in the project), I'd be ecstatic ;)

    However, the rewrite is not "just to change the language". Different languages have different paradigms and idioms, and some things are possible to say in C++ that you have no way of expressing in Java, and the other way around (like, try calling virtual methods in C++ constructor).

  84. Re:HVAC? No, In Floor Heat!--WHAT ABOUT COOLING!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you run cool water through it, the mold will kill anyone with alergies. To get any cooling out of the system, the water will end up being below the dewpoint in most of the country. Condensation brings mold. This is bad.

  85. Here is another solution: by chevelleSS · · Score: 1

    If you happen to own your own house and your heating bill seems high, Try installing Aluminum insulation in the attic. This type of insulation reflects 97% of all radiative heat from entering your house through the attic and I found to be dirt cheap ($130 on E-bay) to cover 1000 square feet of attic space.

    1. Re:Here is another solution: by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      It would be a while before I would install this but I'm curious. Where does it go? Between the stud/truss and sheath or inside between the stud/truss and the sheetrock? I couldn't tell from a picture. How does it compare to things like housewraps or just more fiberglass (more than R19 in the walls or R35 in the ceiling). Thanks.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  86. I do this for a living.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    For heating, zoning works well, since your heating costs are proportional to the difference between inside and outside. For cooling, it's a little different, since the equipment size and air volumes need to be reasonably matched to get a working system. If the airflow is decreased because a zone is closed off, the equipment is less efficient. How much less, compared to the savings of not cooling a room is up to you. Also, having zones shut off can cause floodback conditions, causing wear on the compressor, which can cost alot more than you can save. Heating is less critical, although you can have heat exchanger problems in a furnace if there isn't adequate airflow, ie. half the zones are closed.

    IOW, be careful. I sell my expertise. If someone wants to design a system, then they are welcome to, but I'm not interested in getting involved. This isn't unscrupulous. Guess who you'll call if it doesn't work? Or something burns out? And my time is expensive. I could fiddle with something for days, but will I be payed for it?

    Another issue is the high efficiency cooling equipment, or heat pumps. In humid areas, if you install as per manufacturer's specs for the most efficient, the unit will not dry the air out, and can contribute to mould and high humidity issues. So you may save a couple hundred over a year, then need to spend multiple thousands replacing windows, saturated insulation, etc. Again be careful.

    Swamp coolers work well in very dry areas. In moderate to humid areas, don't even think of them. They will rot your house, and possibly make you sick.

    The best way to save on cooling costs are to shut it off. To save on heating costs, have the house cooler and even cold at night.

    Derek

  87. Swamp cooler? Surely you jest. by Atario · · Score: 1

    UGH. Having grown up with one, I can tell you what these things give you: an exchange of humidity for heat. It may be 10 degrees cooler, but it's also about 80 to 90 percent humidity. Bleah. You can have it.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  88. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    try calling virtual methods in C++ constructor
    You can do this just fine.
  89. Don't unplug your computer to save energy! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    Don't leave your VCR, radio and all other electric devices on standby all the time. They use up a significant amount of power each year.

    If you have to heat your house for the majority of the year, that suggestion is idiocy.

    All the electricity consumed within your house serves to heat it. How?

    The heat from the ~5% inefficiency of the clock radio or VCR's transformer radiates into your house as heat. The light from the display eventually gets absorbed by something dark and is re-radiated as heat. The sound from fans, motors, etc. is just vibration of air molecules and is attenuated over distance as the air molecules rub against each other and create heat.

    With the exception of light, RF and sound which escape your house, 100% of the electrical energy that you consume in your house serves to heat it. Electric heaters are 100% efficient, whether the device consuming the energy is a space heater or a computer (how many watts of energy go out the VGA, audio and network ports? Effectively zero.).

    Now, you can calculate the cost of fuels - oil/gas heat versus electricity - and the per-BTU cost of the heat from each energy. In my case, with a 35 year old oil furnace (which I cannot replace right now for a variety of reasons), the efficiency of the furnace is only about 70%, so my cost per BTU of heat from oil goes up 30%. Which makes it cheaper for me to leave all the lights on, to fire up a collection of old machines crunching SETI@Home units.

    So, in my case, it's more cost effective and energy efficient to leave the clock radio and VCR plugged in.

    Never mind, of course, the fact that turn on and turn off cycles have a tendency to damage electronic equipment, especially the consumer stuff which are designed for continuous duty and optimized for low cost. Blowing a MOSFET in my VCR's power supply or a filter capacitor in my clock radio are both going to be more expensive to repair than the energy the clock radio or VCR would have consumed.

    So... do the math before you make unfounded blanket statements. It sounds like scientific policy conceived of the massive technical knowledge conferred with an arts degree. (I get *so* tired of the "I'm educated! I have a valuable opinion about everything!" crap, and they seem to be especially prone to idiotic brainwashing at weird campus rallies.)

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Don't unplug your computer to save energy! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      Read this. Is 9.4% of your power bill irrelevant?

      If you have to heat your house for the majority of the year, that suggestion is idiocy.
      Sure, if you happen to live in Canada. But most people don't need to heat their home 365days/year. Many even use airconditioning for several months a year to get rid of some heat.
      The heat from the ~5% inefficiency of the clock radio or VCR's transformer radiates into your house as heat.
      A 95% efficient clock radio? You mean a clock radio with a high quality switching mode power supply? I find that hard to believe. More likely it has a (cheaper) 60-75% efficient power supply.
      Transformers are quite effective. 95% efficiency is likely. But PSs have quite a bit more components.
      The VCR? Perhaps. Modern day VCRs are more efficient than older ones.

      Price of heating doesn't depend on efficiency alone. In fact natural gas is the cheapest way to heat a house (Can be differend in other countries) even if it's less efficient than an electric heater.
  90. This is a microcontroller application by Animats · · Score: 1
    Well, first off, you don't really want to run your HVAC from a PC. You want some little microcontroller doing the job. You might talk to that from a PC, but don't put the PC in charge.

    The next logical step is to put in some passive motion detectors, so that when nobody is home, the HVAC system knows it.

    1. Re:This is a microcontroller application by sidetrack · · Score: 1

      Yep - deploying this system on a uC is not out of the question - initial development on a PC is simpler / more flexible tho' (and I already have a PC on 24/7, which I can use).

  91. $200, that's cheap ! by bavodr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Two days ago I paid my bill, 250 EUR. Given that I live alone, with almost no electrical devices turned on, that is even considered a low bill here in Belgium.

    Average families with two children can expect 300 EUR to 500 EUR bill each year.

    1. Re:$200, that's cheap ! by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Wow.. I live alone and my monthly electric bill runs $35-$45 (28-36 EUR) in the winter. However I have gas heat so my gas bill goes rom $3 in the summer to $50 in the winter. Either way I'm still getting out dirt cheep compaired to some other people like my parents.

      BTW I own a condo and not a house. Thats why its so low.

    2. Re:$200, that's cheap ! by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Each year?

      Chances are the submitter meant he got a US$200 electric bill for that month. Not that year!

      Under LIPA we pay about 12 cents per kWh. That's after a rate cut from a few years ago, too. It's estimates that the 19% decreas in electric cost saves the average homeowner US$240 per year... which means the average cost is still over a US$1000 a year.

      Note: 1 EUR ~= US$1.24
      =Smidge=

    3. Re:$200, that's cheap ! by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Apparently Americans consume ridiculous amounts of electricity.
      US$1000 a year means about 8300 kWh/year. That is about twice the amount a typical Dutch household consumes, and even then there are efforts to bring that down (by promoting energy-saving equipment etc)

      We all know that the US government does not give a damn about the environment, but maybe the citizens could be more considerate...

  92. Re:Two concerns: Resale and housing code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Two very good points.

    That's why, ideally, I'd like to see a commercial product designed to retrofit a home HVAC system to be zoned, and I'd like to see the following features:

    1. Fallback mode, where there is a simple, battery-powered central controller that can operate it like a plain vanilla system if something goes wrong with the rest of the system. Sort of like the human heart and respiratory system: the higher brain can take manual control when necessary, but there is an "animal brain" that takes over if need be.
    2. Controller units in each room with no readout and just two buttons: the "it's too hot" button and the "it's too cold" button. EVERYTHING is controlled by these buttons. The system has AI to correlate preferences with the time of day, day of the week, etc. There is no need to set things according to a schedule with some crappy membrane keyboard designed-by-a-monkey user interface. You just press the buttons when you feel uncomfortable, and it learns the rest. It learns that some rooms are not occupied at certain times, that some rooms' temperatures drift downward faster (in the winter) than others, and that some people (person in bedroom #1 vs. the person in bedroom #2) like it hotter or cooler. Additionally, there is a sort of constant energy-saving "pressure" to the settings. In the summer, it never keeps it too cool and relies on you to occasionally (once every couple of days maybe) hit the "it's too hot" button to confirm that you still need the cooling effect that it is providing. If you don't, it will gradually raise the temperatue (by perhaps 0.5 or 1 degree Fahrenheit per day), or at least the temperature for that zone at that time of the day and week.
    3. A knob that controls how energy-efficient you want to be. Basically, this would control the level of responsiveness to the "too hot" and "too cold" buttons. Set it to "miserly", and the system more aggresively adjusts the temperature, requiring you to hit the discomfort buttons more often. Set it to comfy, and it keeps the temps about the same.
    4. Final feature: a temporary override or "snooze button". Let's say I'm normally happy having it at 77F during the summer, but it's 3:00pm and I am having a big, big group of people over at 5:00pm. I should be able to tell it to start chilling down the house in advance.

    Basically, everything but the last one is a simplification of the user interface. You don't really necessarily care what temperature your house is (in most cases), you just care if you're comfortable or not and what compromise you are making between being comfortable and saving energy. If you can just adjust both those things, then you get everything you need and the system is easier to operate than a normal system, and not really much harder to maintain.

  93. errr ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely that should be resent? Unless you actually do look like a three line comment. In which case I apologise profusely.

  94. Sustainable lifestyles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear US Slashdot readers.

    Perhaps you might like to reflect on the fact that you unsustainable lifestyles are the problem here?

    Why was there a way in Iraq? WMD or oil?

    If you drove cars that were as economical as those driven in Europe it would cut your demand for imported oil by 90%.

    1. Re:Sustainable lifestyles... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      I would post the "PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS" asci however I guess it contains to many junk characters. :/

    2. Re:Sustainable lifestyles... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Dear European reader:

      Last time I checked, late-model Volkswagens seem use more fuel for a given engine size than similar vehicles made in Japan. BMWs and Mercedes aren't economical at all.

      Forget European cars; buy Japanese.

      As for the Iraq war question, ask Tony Blair. He's European, in case you didn't know.

  95. It's more about COMFORT than economy by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    "this sounds like a good solution for those who are getting screwed with outrageously high electric bills"

    No. Basic zone control via air flow control is mostly about comfort and preventing hot and cold spots. It does save a bit of money, but mostly because you don't have to overcool one area to make another cool enough to tolerate.

    If you get into advanced control, with schedules for individual zones, temperature diferentials between zones, and all the things this project seems to make possible, you could save more money.

    However, the most important part of an energy-saving system is the hand that controls the thermostat. I remember some TV coverage at the height of the California electricity crunch ... a woman complaining about her huge electricity bill, while her two kids played on the carpet behind her in t-shirts and shorts. If she had turned the t-stat down 10-15 degrees and put the kids in warmer clothes she would have saved a bundle.

    All the basic moneysavers apply: sun screens for windows in hot climates (worth a fast 20 drop in indoor temperature), insulation in the attic, weatherstripping and caulking, storm or dual pane windows ... whatever gets you the fastest return on investment.

  96. High flow shower heads by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Most of the low flow in shower heads is done through a washer that is easily removed. However if you have a newer house, the pipes themselves are low flow. I'm thinking of running a second line...

    --
    This is my sig.
  97. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by PoPRawkZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I work for a HVAC wholesale distributor and I can get a Honeywell Chronotherm IV Single Stage Heatpump for 63.62 USD. The guy in the article 'vt' was using a Honeywell Chronotherm III. I don't know anyone who could build a micro tower for less than that.

    --
    peace,
    -Grokent
  98. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    If remote issues are you problem, get the (ahem) Sony programmable remote. The interface is fully programmable, so you don't have to teach anyone anything. Of course, this is a $300 or so remote....

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  99. Re:Swamp cooler? Surely you jest. by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    This is true, but if the outdoor humidity is near 0% (Like Arizona, for example), then the added humidity will probably help the comfort level quite a bit.

    That being said, since swamp coolers work by evaporating water, they tend to do *nothing* in humid climates... except grow mold and mildew!
    =Smidge=

  100. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    The canonical rule is KISS, Keep It Simple, Stupid. (Kind of like Read the Fine Manual.) There's no need for a complicated protocol. Define classes of devices and support them. The first one we're interested in is a heating register. The settings will presumably be on or off, and maybe a middle setting. Feedback, if any, will probably be restricted to open, closed, or in between. You can use a simple optical sensor ala floppy drive to count marks and detect the door's position (not with much granularity, but how much do you need?) if you really want feedback. Meanwhile the device itself should store "calibration" information so that it knows where to set the servo, so all you have to do is ask it for open or closed. So you will need commands to nudge the device up or down one step for each state you're interested in. Not a big deal, I think.

    Remember the devices don't have to be very intelligent. Only the controlling unit needs to be. If you make it smart enough it can interface to disparate systems and even broker communications between them if necessary. The devices being intelligent is about as necessary as a bolt knowing how to screw itself in.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  101. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by vthome · · Score: 1

    See, the thing is that the abstraction layers are not where you think they are. It's not the register itself that is a device... It's a long story - take a look at the site, *then* let's talk.

    As for KISS, totally agree. As for optical sensor - now, *that* is already an overcomplication. There are other feedback mechanisms - indirect through temperature change, etc.

  102. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by vthome · · Score: 1

    Couple of differences...

    First, you work for a *distributor*. A brief glance at the landscape shows that not only it is nearly impossible for an average home owner to get a hold of wholesale prices, but, to add insult to an injury, HVAC contractors become quite jealous and may drop you like hot potato if they find something "not installed by licensed HVAC contractor" in your house.

    Second, you'd be surprised how low are the prices on used computers...

    As for Chronotherm - well, it's just a thermostat, right? No zoning included, right?

  103. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    But now you're talking about having a temperature sensor, which requires just as much support hardware as the optical sensor. Most of these microcontrollers already have counters, you just count increment or decrement pulses and you know where the thing is set. Optical sensors are better than switches because they don't have points, they don't wear out. An optical sensor is just an IR LED, an IR Receiver, and a template with some holes in it to make it generate pulses. A lot of people use cheap mice as rotational sensors because they are around $3, have two high-resolution optical sensors, and have RS-232 serial output, which is easy and cheap to interface to. (A good cheap mouse also has three button sensors, and they generally have at least two.) The problem with using mice as the sensor units for heating registers is that you only get two registers per mouse and you need one serial port per mouse. If you have a small house with only six registers, you already need three mice and that won't help you control the registers, so you might as well build something that does the sensing, too.

    It's true that you don't strictly need a sensor though. A friend of mine built a system like this for a geek house in Santa Cruz (Darkwater) something like a decade ago. I dunno what he used to control the servos, but since it was when he was learning PIC assembly for a wide range of other projects, I can only assume he used PIC chips. Instead of a serial interface, however, the chips did only one thing; open the damper when the thermostat in the room itself requested heat, and turn it off. The thermostats would also be fed into an OR tree at the furnace, which would turn on if any thermostat demanded heat. This was in Santa Cruz as I stated, where no one (almost) has AC, so it was heat-only. If you're doing heating and cooling through the same vents, to do it right is much more complicated. For example, room A wants to be colder, room B is fine, and room C wants to be hotter. Now you really want to know how far out of their desired temperature range the rooms are, so you can decide whether to apply heat or cold, and for how long.

    In order to really do this right (or what I consider right) you need a temperature sensor in the room (not just a thermostat, which demands cold or heat, but doesn't tell you how far past spec it is) and optimally you should have a sensor on each door and window so that you can tell if your efforts to change the room's temperature will bear fruit. You also want to know the temperature inside the vent, and the ambient (outside) temperature.

    Personally I envision each sensor having a list of features, each feature having a set of capabilities. For example your ambient temperature sensor, assuming it is in a single device, has the feature TEMPERATURE and the capability READ. A register might have TEMPERATURE READ (for the temperature of the air just before it leaves the register), VENT READ (to read the vent's position, optional) and VENT SET to set the vent to some percentage open. So you could query the register controller with "CAPABILITIES?^M" and it would send back "TEMPERATURE READ^MVENT READ SET^M". This is, of course, by way of example, I happen to like human-readable protocols. Incidentally in my hypothetical system devices communicate via RS-422 serial and the same protocol is used by device and host, and you need some way to specify which device you're talking to. I also want some scheme for autodiscovery but that could be as simple as walking IDs. However I would rather use unique (but settable) serial numbers for devices than have (say) dip-switches to set an ID, though that would also be an acceptable solution. The only problem there is that you can only have as many addresses as you want to wire up, you can multiplex the signal but that requires additional circuitry. It'd be better just to have devices with their own ID, I'm contemplating using EEPROM PICs anyway.

    The more data you have to work with the more "intelligent" your

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  104. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by shokk · · Score: 1

    My Pronto was $200 off Ebay for a programmable interface. Works well and I can make pretty pretty pictures for buttons and menus.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  105. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your family sounds pretty stupid. Maybe you should cut them loose.

  106. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by vthome · · Score: 1
    Dude, are you sure you don't want to join the project? :)

    A lot of people use cheap mice as rotational sensors because they are around $3

    This basically doubles the cost of a sensor, which is by itself the same $3. Multiply by number of registers, and you have a sizable figure already, in comparison to the price of the rest of the equipment.

    I agree, this would be a good solution for a 100% bulletproof installation, but the thing is, in reality - it's overkill. I've had servos work for about 3 years without a single failure. Servos are designed to be abused, and they stand that pretty well. And again, there are other fault detection measures that don't require additional hardware.

    It's true that you don't strictly need a sensor though. A friend of mine built a system like this for a geek house in Santa Cruz (Darkwater) something like a decade ago. I dunno what he used to control the servos, but since it was when he was learning PIC assembly for a wide range of other projects, I can only assume he used PIC chips. Instead of a serial interface, however, the chips did only one thing; open the damper when the thermostat in the room itself requested heat, and turn it off. The thermostats would also be fed into an OR tree at the furnace, which would turn on if any thermostat demanded heat. This was in Santa Cruz as I stated, where no one (almost) has AC, so it was heat-only. If you're doing heating and cooling through the same vents, to do it right is much more complicated. For example, room A wants to be colder, room B is fine, and room C wants to be hotter. Now you really want to know how far out of their desired temperature range the rooms are, so you can decide whether to apply heat or cold, and for how long.

    In order to really do this right (or what I consider right) you need a temperature sensor in the room

    Done

    and optimally you should have a sensor on each door and window so that you can tell if your efforts to change the room's temperature will bear fruit.

    No hardware is required here - watching temperature change trends gives the same result. Trane CM-Zone (at least) does that.

    You also want to know the temperature inside the vent,

    Done

    and the ambient (outside) temperature.

    Done

    Personally I envision each sensor having a list of features, each feature having a set of capabilities. For example your ambient temperature sensor, assuming it is in a single device, has the feature TEMPERATURE and the capability READ. A register might have TEMPERATURE READ (for the temperature of the air just before it leaves the register), VENT READ (to read the vent's position, optional) and VENT SET to set the vent to some percentage open. So you could query the register controller with "CAPABILITIES?^M" and it would send back "TEMPERATURE READ^MVENT READ SET^M".

    Some of the information is not quite necessary - for example, temperature of the air leaving the vent is practically useless. "VENT SET" is a must :)

    This is, of course, by way of example, I happen to like human-readable protocols.

    Same here

    Incidentally in my hypothetical system devices communicate via RS-422 serial and the same protocol is used by device and host, and you need some way to specify which device you're talking to.

    Herein lies the problem. Sure, RS-422, RS-232 and 1-Wire are nice protocols, but out of them just one (I *know* RS-232 doesn't, and I *suspect* RS-422 doesn't) protocol, 1-Wire, supports the facilities for autoprobing for *any* hardware that is connected to it. Sure, there are some devices on serial ports that act intelligently when asked to, but *one* bad device will spoil things for the rest of them.

  107. Re:That project doesn't conform to the industry sp by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Some of the information is not quite necessary - for example, temperature of the air leaving the vent is practically useless. "VENT SET" is a must :)

    While you can infer anything you like from the data provided, if something should go bad you will have nothing to fall back on. While I can see that watching the change in temperature in the room will give you a good indicator, based on what you know of ambient temperature, which doors or windows are open or closed. But if any component in your system reports erroneous data you will have no way to know except that the system starts misbehaving, and a person notices. This might be acceptable but since we can avoid it, we might as well do so.

    imagine mentioning words like "EEPROM", "PIC", "multiplex", and others like that to an ordinary non-geek. You'd get a boot right away. The system's gotta be idiot proof, period.

    That stuff is all internal to the device, and thus irrelevant in that it need not be exposed. Only the unit's ID number which can be as simple or as complicated as you like so long as (for the basic idea of not having two devices colliding in the name space) they are unique to the channel they are on, or for more flexible configuration, unique to your system.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  108. Cool by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info, I'm looking for a new remote to work with my new AV receiver (the included remote is rather humungous and unwieldy).

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  109. Re:(Godfather Voice) Don't forget about the family by PoPRawkZ · · Score: 0

    The comment I replied to insinuated that thermostats were overly expensive. I was just pointing out that the markup is made by the contractor who makes a margin AND charges for install on top of it. DIYourselfers would find it advantageous to purchase their thermostat direct from a retail outlet either on the net for through a local distributor. My company personall does very little business with the public, but several of my competitors do offer retail.

    --
    peace,
    -Grokent
  110. Re:Do it yourself HVAC by Zurk · · Score: 1

    neato.

  111. wrong by bmajik · · Score: 1

    the german cars that come to the states are not representative of what most of europe is driving. only the large displacement engines make the journey over the pond do the US market. BMW has numerous 4 cylinder and diseel models but these are not seen in the states because they are not cost effective to bring here, and to a lesser extent don't support BMW's branding image of a luxuruy marque.

    Similarly, the VW Passat has something like 20 engine and gearbox combinations in germany but very few here.

    That said, japan makes some very fuel efficient cars. The fuel efficient ones tend to be pretty shitty in terms of sporting character, however. The typical german car doesn't suffer from this... especially the TD models.. the base turbodeisel engines in german spec vehicles are putting out similar torque to the highest performing JDM vehicles. 320nm in a subcompact TD is not uncommon, of less than 2 liters displacement.

    In the USA BMW has never sold a 5 series with less than 2.5L. This is the "baby" engine here. In the 80s there was the 528e with the 2.8L "economy" motor. IN europe the idea of a 2.8L motor being "economy" or "small" is ridiculous. The same year that the USA got the 528e with 2.7L, and the 535 with 3.5L, most european markets also got a 516 with 1.6L I4, a 520 with 2.0L i4 (or i6), a 528 with 2.8L i6.

    Note that all of these models are typically lighter than their US counterparts as well, (less standard options.. i.e. you could get a 7 series BMW with crank windows, and a 5 series BMW with cloth interior), which further improves fuel economy (and performance, for that matter)

    VW is certainly no leader in specific output, and have some real duds in the US market (the base model 2.0 gas engine being a notable peice of garbage, in all respects). On the other hand, a comparison of JDM and euro-spec engines should take a few things into consideration

    1) fuel quality and type
    2) displacement
    3) total output
    4) specific output
    5) torque profile
    6) powerplant weight

    i think what you'll find is that many JDM (and us imported) motors are very lacking in torque as compared to US and german counterparts. While high specific output is admirable, the difference between a 240hp Honda S2000 motor and a 240hp E36 M3 motor is more than 0hp. The M3 takes an extra liter of displacement, but rewards you with roughly 80 more ft/lbs of peak torque, and over a MUCH broader range than the S2000 motor. That is a 50% torque increase (which golly.. so is the displacement increase).

    Wether or not performance, torque, flexibility, etc are important to you is up to you and your driving style. the BMW i6 is a very economical motor, given its capabilities. But nobody drives it for that reason.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:wrong by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This isn't about torque, it's about who has any right to criticize.

      I'll agree that BMW 7-series aren't representative of the typical European car, but I'd say Volkswagen Jettas and Passats are, and my point is they're not the most fuel-efficient cars around. And even if Mercedes G-wagens aren't representative of the "typical" European car, they certainly do come from Europe, so I on that basis I challenge the parent poster's assertion that America wastes too much fuel when his own homeland is just as bad at building gas guzzlers as we are, even if not as many people are buying them. No one fawns over tiny economy cars here, but neither do they there.

    2. Re:wrong by bmajik · · Score: 1

      the Passats you see in the US are NOT representative of the euro market models. Re-read what i said about the passat - over there it has a much much wider variety of engine choices... all of which are lower displacement than the 2.8 offered here.

      The 2.8 incidentally is not a bad motor - far from it - it makes 190hp and 203 ft/lbs, revs very freely with a near 7000 rpm limit.

      Re: right to criticize -
      well, its common for someone in germany with a RUF 911 or similar gas guzzling car to ride their bike to the market instead of drive the porsche. so in that sense, when people take to the roads they do so to DRIVE, not for a 5 minute start/stop cycle. The fuel costs in germany HAVE affected peoples thoughts on driving there in a way that they haven't in the US.

      the basemodel passat and jetta engine is a 1.8L turbo in the states. Not a gas guzzler by any means. Nor the pinnacle of fuel economy, but all in all it is a good powerplant.

      Really we'd all be better off if people were driving base model passats as opposed to escalades or grand cherokees. That may have been the point being made. Here in Fargo, essentially every vehicle is a GM with the 3800 motor. 3.8L for an uninspiring, underwhelming car seems ridiculous. That's more than some of europes most exotic super cars.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  112. If you feel so strongly about the water issue by tepples · · Score: 1

    At what HTTP URL have you published your open letter to your legislators about this issue? And have you sent the letter to your state legislators?

  113. One drawback by potat0man · · Score: 1

    My father just put this in his den. I'll admit, it feels nice to step onto off the cold tile. But if I sit there watching tv for more than ten minutes with my fee flat on the floor, they start to sweat like no tomorrow.

  114. Chrysler Ecology? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    Your nick is "BigBlockMopar" and you're talking about ecological projects?

    Hello my AC stalker, who nit-picks everything I ever say, but lacks the balls to post with his username. Good to see you again, you've been quieter recently. I so enjoy shooting you down.

    Yup. I'm into muscle cars - you know, the big 1960s and 1970s American V8s. Guys like me are usually interested in getting the most power out of these already powerful engines. Now, guess what the laws of stoichimetry say about power? Yup, clean burn, to get the most power out of every single drop of gasoline.

    Consequently, many restored 1960s and 1970s musclecars burn *cleaner* on HC and CO emissions than the state-mandated emissions tests on modern cars. And note that this is without catalytic converters which restrict the exhaust flow and therefore cause up to a 20% decrease in the mileage of so-festooned newer cars.

    However, old cars (before 1972-1973) do not have EGR systems (which reduce fuel efficiency and therefore increase CO2 emissions). Not having EGR systems causes the emission of NOx gases. Fortunately, NOx is created in - and stable at - the temperatures and pressures inside the engine's cylinders. When it reaches our temperature and pressure, it disintegrates fairly readily.

    How about burning your car,

    I think that wouldn't be beneficial to the environment. For one thing, the combustion of plastics and vinyls (primarily interior padding and wiring harness components) is always messy, especially when they're designed to be flame-retardant.

    Another thing would be that the vehicle would then have to be replaced. Manufacturing a car requires terrific energy resources even assuming perfect reclamation of materials by recycling. You should really try calculating how much CO2 is liberated during the combustion of coal in a steel mill in order to manufacture a car. Lifetime tailpipe emissions are nothing compared to the manufacturing; and modern cars are only incrementally more efficient (Moore's Law does not apply to cars). It's more environmentally friendly to maintain your car and keep it as long as possible than it is to replace it after a mere 20 years. I'd invite you to do the math. You will find all the required understanding in even a first year college chemistry textbook.

    chrysler has a long history of making the least fuel effecient and most highly polluting engines on the market,

    Really? That's news to me. Let's see... where would you like me to start?

    While the only foreign manufacturer of note (VW) was still making their highly inefficient air-cooled Beetle engines, Detroit was building water-cooled (good for emissions) flathead engines. In 1959, Chrysler introduced their Slant-6, an OHV inline 6 on a 30-degree incline and using a tunnel-ram intake manifold. It was an extremely high-tech engine conceived for fuel efficiency and powered their economy cars (while Ford and GM didn't offer efficient and clean OHV engines for their cheapest offerings).

    From the 1960 to 1966 model year, Chrysler's Slant-6 won the Mobil Economy Race, going further on a tank of fuel than other offerings.

    At the same time, Chrysler's car bodies were almost all lightweight unibodies with the sole exceptions of the Imperials and trucks. This while Ford and GM continued to build huge quantites of heavy full-frame cars into the 1980s.

    By the 1970s, the Slant-6 was still more refined, fuel-efficient and clean-burning than most of GM and Ford's early OHV engines - you will note that GM and Ford had to discontinue a greater percentage of their engine lines in the early 1970s as the Clean Air Act and CAFE were introduced. Even so, the Slant-6 was fitted with feedback carbs and electronic spark advance systems. While they were buggy, the feedback carbs and spark advance systems were pioneering steps toward today's full-feedback EFI systems.

    You'll note that by the late 1970s, Detroit was using electronic ignition (if not with spark advance) on all their offerings, while the

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  115. just how much do you pay for water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Family of 5: $35/month, less than 500 per year. Never think about the amount we use, our house is rarely empty and I swear our washer runs 3 hours a day. I'd guess we spend more on toilet paper.

    Why bother putting resources into conservation of something so inexpensive?

    Now my heating bill is another thing, upwards to $300 on a cold month. I have hot water heat and the idea of installing a bunch of valves and re-doing the plumbing for zone heat sounds like great fun, just not cost effective either.