Slashdot Mirror


Commodore BBSes Return using the Internet.

oldbitcollector writes "Several Commodore 64 enthusiasts have developed a method for putting Commodore BBS sytems on the Internet. Users can "dial" using a standard 64 connected to the Internet or by using a "CG Term" for the PC. Details can be found here."

261 comments

  1. What? by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 5, Funny

    No VIC-20 support? Darn, and I've even got a tape drive.

    1. Re:What? by Zapper · · Score: 1

      Dude! Let's hook up, I got the 16k RAM expansion.

      --
      So much to do, so little bandwidth.
      --
      Try Mozilla
  2. Legacy by commo1 · · Score: 1

    Wow! I hope they can port the Apple II to the internet in the same way. This might be the begining of a legacy movement to get older systems no only running but on the WWW in one working format or another. Even if it's just an FTP login or telnet prompt --- Way cool....!!!!

    1. Re:Legacy by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      How 'bout a web server?

      Hey, it ran on a C64, and the server lasted through a two-week long slashdotting... An Apple //e would normally have twice the RAM. Now we just need LANceGS support in the Contiki A2 port...

  3. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! Let the ASCII wars BEGIN!

    1. Re:cool by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      There are still quite a few BBSes out there, feel free to visit mine (theroughnecks.net) especially if you like ansi telnet... :) (can get a telnet client from my website, for dos/ansi..

      There are quite a few free, and non-free options.. I run on synchronet, while mystic and elebbs also get some use...

      Synchronet is being actively developed under windows and linux(x86), in addition to big-endian ports in the works. There is also MBSE for linux..

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  4. Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just what the world needs-- more underpowered computers connected to the internet so that we can all DoS *ahem* I mean Slashdot them.

    Hip hip Horray!

    1. Re:Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      In your News Night TV 6 advantage at 11 - today someone wrote the first C-64 worm. This worm finds all internet enabled C-64's and turns them into undead zombies, capable of unleashing a DDOS attack of about 19200 baud combined.

      System admins, for some reason, are not paying much attention to this latest threat.....

    2. Re:Oh boy! by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shit... you could DoS 'em with a fancy toaster... wouldn't take much.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:Oh boy! by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Just what the world needs-- more underpowered computers connected to the internet so that we can all DoS *ahem* I mean Slashdot them.

      Yeah, it's sure good to know that things haven't changed as far as underpowered computers connecting on the Internet...makes me want to hook my fishbowl to it :>

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    4. Re:Oh boy! by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck, that external power supply brick for the C64 was a toaster!

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    5. Re:Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't be the first 64 worm anyway, slapnuts.

    6. Re:Oh boy! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1, Informative

      Funny thing is, those BBSes probably can't scale, but a C64 running Contiki (actually, it was before the web and VNC servers were added to Contiki, but it was the same technology) doesn't melt when the web server that's SERVING DYNAMIC PAGES, the TWO VNC servers, and the RealAudio server gets slashdotted. Funny, how the DSL modem comes MUCH closer to melting than the C64 when under a /.ing...

  5. Weird by ziggy_zero · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's with that period? It makes the headline seem so...threatening, ominous.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:Weird by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm... I've seen a lot of grammar Nazis around... never a grammar paranoid :)

      .

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:Weird by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Commodore BBSs were such fun for cracker sysops. Since they stored user passwords in the clear for any sysop to read, once you had sysop access on two different popular BBSs, you could tell who used the same password on all their accounts everywhere.

      Once upon a time, there was even a BBS owner/sysop I knew who didn't bother to use more than one password.

      Need I say more?

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's with that period? It makes the headline seem so...threatening, ominous.

      They. stole. the. idea. from. Deloitte.

    4. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Weird by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Once upon a time, there was even a BBS owner/sysop I knew who didn't bother to use more than one password.

      True, but what could you gain access to with other people's passwords at the time? Another commodore BBS? Getting a chance to cheat in an online game? Posting as this person, "I am a foofoo head because I use the same password everywhere!" Once upon a time, passwords were pretty damn worthless.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:Weird by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      ...what could you gain access to with other people's passwords at the time?

      one word. Reputation.

    7. Re:Weird by talon77 · · Score: 1

      Actually, there were a ton of BBS's that charged. I ran an 12-line BBS that charged $.30/hour (Big bucks, ahh yeah). So if you had a password for a paying account, you could use it to transfer credits to a non-paying account, or just to access the site for free. Passwords have always had a purpose.

    8. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a social experiment, I set up a public BBS on my C=64 (using EBBS), and posted the Sysop password as part of the login screen.

      I wanted to see whether people would try to hose it, even if there was no challenge in cracking the password, or if they would self-administer it.

      Well, it was up for about a day before a punker-doodle decided to format the floppy...

  6. setting low expecations by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Funny

    One has to wonder about an implimentation for "fringe" computers when the website (http://www.petscii.com/) supports IE but only gives a blank page if opened in Netscape.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:setting low expecations by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      For some reason he fails to use any HTML, HEAD, or BODY tags in his pages. I suspect ignorance, not malice. As usual.

    2. Re:setting low expecations by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Microsoft ported IE to the Commodore 64.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:setting low expecations by witchman · · Score: 1

      I can see the page just fine using Firefox 0.8

    4. Re:setting low expecations by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      IIRC, head and body tags aren't absolutely neccesary. They're simply there for your convenience.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    5. Re:setting low expecations by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      No, they have always been required. However, since MSIE 4.0 and up, IE has allowed extremely poor HTML grammar. This leads to a lot of bad web pages and "web developers" that can only code for the latest MS browser.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    6. Re:setting low expecations by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      What version of Netscape are you using?
      Opens fine for me.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    7. Re:setting low expecations by Zapper · · Score: 1

      Probably saves himself a considerable amount of disk space by their omission. :-)

      --
      So much to do, so little bandwidth.
      --
      Try Mozilla
    8. Re:setting low expecations by larsoncc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what you said. Firefox works just fine.

    9. Re:setting low expecations by nomadic · · Score: 1

      That's a good thing. If some piece of OSS did this people would praise it as being "robust", but MS gets criticized...

    10. Re:setting low expecations by platipusrc · · Score: 1
      well, it would be similar if gcc would allow this program to compile:

      int main ({

      int x = 1;
      x=x+y;
      return y;
      };

      I personally think that web browsers should barf on pages that don't validate. It might not be possible to do that now because almost no pages do, but it would've been nice if the browsers hadn't started out allowing such bad coding.
      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    11. Re:setting low expecations by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem you realize is that the "web" was being marketed as the peoples medium not a techies wet dream.... so supporting less than 100% HTML would be a good idea.

      For the most part forgetting a tag or here there while violating the almighty standard really poses no huge problems. What pisses me off is the demand for huge graphics, flash, sounds, ActiveX, etc...

      Seems people can't express what they want to say so they make up scores of useless animations that don't say anything.... for them!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:setting low expecations by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      I personally think that web browsers should barf on pages that don't validate.
      Well, that would eliminate many* sites. In fact, there'd probably be only two sites left on the whole i-net.

      * No wonder it is blocked; they get failing remarks for their "master development" skillz:

      File: Slashdot.htm
      Doctype:
      Encoding:

      I was not able to extract a character encoding labeling from any of the valid sources for such information. Without encoding information it is impossible to validate the document. The sources I tried are:

      • The HTTP Content-Type field.
      • The XML Declaration.
      • The HTML "META" element.

      And I even tried to autodetect it using the algorithm defined in Appendix F of the XML 1.0 Recommendation.

      Since none of these sources yielded any usable information, I will not be able to validate this document. Sorry. Please make sure you specify the character encoding in use.

      IANA maintains the list of official names for character sets.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    13. Re:setting low expecations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is not just trying to undermine the W3C here. Netscape has a patent on the HEAD and BODY tags, so IE just ignores them.

    14. Re:setting low expecations by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Following the rules of a language, even a markup language, should be mandatory.

      And I criticized MSIE for this years before I'd heard of OSS. This isn't zealout MS bashing, it's an expert (7 years web development) opinion.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    15. Re:setting low expecations by platipusrc · · Score: 1

      well, your site link validates, and so does mine, so that should be enough to keep everyone entertained for a while doncha think? ;)

      Also, one my favorite sites validates, too!

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
    16. Re:setting low expecations by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      No, they have always been required.


      No, it's optional. Check the specs for HTML 4.01.

      The HTML element is optional.

      The HEAD element is optional.

      TITLE however is required.

      BODY is even optional.

      So the following should be perfectly valid HTML (let's watch Slashcode screw this up...)
      <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
      "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
      <title&g t; I should be valid</title>
      <p>Unless my author screwed up that is</p>
      Damn, well, the opening title tag gets screwed by slashcode, but you get the idea.
    17. Re:setting low expecations by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      I should just add that IIRC, the rules are toughened up in XHTML, making the whole HTML, HEAD, BODY bit required.

    18. Re:setting low expecations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the standards-compliant Opera browser, and combat IE while still viewing many sites (petscii works here...)

    19. Re:setting low expecations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Web... being marketed...? Are you stupid? It's just here. Nobody asked fucking morons to start butchering HTML and making utterly worthless glam pages.

    20. Re:setting low expecations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using slashdot as an example of bad HTML really doesn't help your argument. We know slashdot is utterly horrid HTML and have been trying to convince the lazy asses behind it to fix it up. Hell, people have even offered to help and they still won't do it. If it takes being puked on by every browser in the world, then I say make with the regurgitating.

    21. Re:setting low expecations by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      how is the title, which is in the head, required when the head is not?

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    22. Re:setting low expecations by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't know. I put it down to some weird SGML thing. I ran across this example on Ian Hixie's (Opera and Mozilla dev) blog about a year ago (and I was just as suprised as you appear to be).

      My best guess is that the UA is obliged to work out for itself where HEAD should have been, and create a "fake" one in it's DOM. Kind of like how HTML 4.01 doesn't require you to close P or LI tags, so if you don't, the UA works out where they should be closed, and closes them.

      Another thing that's worth defending IE for (and there arn't many) is it's error recovery. HTML is a very permissive markup language. The specs don't define exactly what should happen in cases of malformed markup, so UAs are free to try just about anything to recover. So IE coping with all sorts of garbage doesn't go against any rules.

      XML (and by extention XHTML) is much stricter. On encountering the first markup error UAs are supposed to either display just what they have up to that point and bail out with an error, or display nothing and bail out with an error. IIRC If you send invalid XHTML (sans the XML preamble, as is permissable according to XHTML 1.0) to IE with an XML mime type, it will throw it back at you. (Sending XHTML with a HTML mime type or the XML version preamble throws IE into quirks mode, making IE treat the XHTML as tag soup HTML.)

  7. modems by dan2550 · · Score: 5, Funny

    HAH! my 28.8 modem days finally pay off! now I actually can do something that people with broadband can't do. there is nothing like a carrier signal to lift the sprits.

    1. Re:modems by bsd4me · · Score: 1

      28.8? The fastest modem I had for my C64 was 300 baud.

      --

      (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    2. Re:modems by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry to burst your little bubble, but us broadbanders can also connect to these BBS'es using CGTerm, as mentioned in the article.

      Guess you'll have to make do with A-HA and Duran Duran albums for that exclusive sense nostalgia ... oh wait, I have those too :P

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    3. Re:modems by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. I started out with a 110 bps Baudot modem. I also used to walk ten miles through six feet of snow to get to school when I was a kid.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:modems by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I started out with a 110 bps Baudot modem. I also used to walk ten miles through six feet of snow to get to school when I was a kid

      I didn't know 110bps modems could double has snow boots...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:modems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      us broadbanders can also connect to these BBS'es using CGTerm
      Well, maybe we can once that site gets over it's slashdotting...
    6. Re:modems by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I didn't know 110bps modems could double has snow boots.

      Acoustic modems indeed could double as snowboots if you really wanted. Wrap the db-25 cable around your feet and you have little suction cups for those ice patches.

      I suspect the baudot modem was less practical for this application however.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:modems by MrWa · · Score: 1
      Sorry to burst your little bubble, but us broadbanders can also connect to these BBS'es using CGTerm, as mentioned in the article.

      Hey, but the guy some slack. He's still trying to download the article on his 56k modem...

  8. Revolutionary by neoform · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    While we're at it why not use that old 33/66 and 14.4.. nostalgia is all great and all, but using archaic technology really doesn't serve much purpose..

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Revolutionary by Zerbey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You really need to look into this more, a 33Mhz system with a 14.4 modem actually has a lot of uses. It'd make a decent (but very low bandwith) home firewall, for one.

      Just because it's old doesn't mean it's not useful!

    2. Re:Revolutionary by Soko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flat out wrong.

      Where we've been determines where we're going. "Those who don't pay attention to history are doomed to repeat it" and all that. Use that machine, so you can see why things developed the way they did - maybe you'll avoid some of the miskates made prior to you.

      That 33/66 you have contains half of the reasons things are the way they are now. Your new Athlon64 can run DOS, after all, just like the old stuff. Study the older machines, friend, they'll show you much about today's "new" technology.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    3. Re:Revolutionary by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Our school uses an old mainframe and a 9600 baud modem to handle the registration of ~20000 students.

    4. Re:Revolutionary by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      You really need to look into this more, a 33Mhz system with a 14.4 modem actually has a lot of uses.

      For instance, it will keep a door open in the stiffest of breezes.

      Also, it will keep a trout line solidly anchored even in high winds.

    5. Re:Revolutionary by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call your 14.4 modem terribly useful, but I'm in agreement with your comment regarding old systems. I myself run a website hosted on a Macintosh LC III (25 Mhz 68030) running Linux.

      www.32bitwonder.org

  9. Very nice, but... by Travoltus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How can this be very useful? The C64 has about 32K of useable RAM and about an 800K floppy... am I missing something, have they come up with larger mass storage systems for the C64 or something?

    (This isn't intended as a troll or flamebait... it's a genuine question....)

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Very nice, but... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I suppose the safest stuff to trade without recourse for the moment is C64 Warez

      When you log on, check out the Uploads/New!!0-3Decades/ folder for all the latest stuff :)

    2. Re:Very nice, but... by Beebos · · Score: 1

      I assume it is useful for people with C64s to communicate with one another and to up/download software.

    3. Re:Very nice, but... by Phexro · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, IIRC the 1541 was single-sided, single-density, around 160kb of storage.

      But yes, there are various different expansions available, including hard drives and more memory. There were various 3rd-party options, and now someone has developed a way to hook up an IDE drive to a C64. It also can be used to access CF cards.

      I believe that apps had to support the memory upgrade peripherals. I seem to recall them being fairly popular with GEOS users.

    4. Re:Very nice, but... by Cthefuture · · Score: 2, Informative

      800k?! You must be thinking Amiga.

      The 1541 held a massive 170kB (per side; disk had to be flipped manually) and transfered data at a blazing 400 bytes per second.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    5. Re:Very nice, but... by diodeus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A buddy and I wrote an ran a BBS program for the Commodore 64 (the Spence XP BBS).It ran, successfully, on a single 160K floopy drive. It even have a full-screen editor. I was selling it commercially while I was still in highschool.

      We even had to renumber the BASIC line numbers, because they were stores as strings. Many calls to "GOSUB 55000" took up way too much so we did silly things like change that to "GOSUB 3", then line 3 said "goto 55000" Woo hoo! we recovered 200 bytes!

      As the BASIC program grew we ran out of memory and started re-writing bits of it in 6502 assembler. We had bits of machine code stuck in unusual places like the cassette drive buffer, ram under the basic ROM, unused ram between the basic ROM and the OS rom, on the screen RAM, you name it.

      You'd load up the program, then swap the floopy, putting in your "download section" disk. Hey, good programs where 32K back then :)

      Later some company made a proprietary SCSI controller and a 10MB external hard drive. I had two of them for a while. Yup, a C64 with 20MB downwload section.

      I also ran the BBS list for Toronto Computes!, and had a monthly column on BBSing that I wrote between 1985-1995. I was a big supporter of the BBS scene back them.

      - James.

    6. Re:Very nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and you could cook your food on top of the back part of the drive where the power supply was.

    7. Re:Very nice, but... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      How can this be very useful? The C64 has about 32K of useable RAM

      Actually, it's a very secure system to go on the internet with, for one thing: even the smallest Windows virus won't fit in 32K.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    8. Re:Very nice, but... by JohnA · · Score: 1

      Actually, a 170k floppy. :-)

    9. Re:Very nice, but... by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Back in the day for storage on the C64, major C64 BBS's ran SFD 1001 drives a 1 meg floppy drive. SFD stands for Super Floppy Drive. Before HD adapters came along, chain's of floppy drives where common on most BBS's. And really on the C64, 4 megs of diskspace was alot.

    10. Re:Very nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however the amount of pings and scans you get from infected windows machines elsewhere on the net DoSes your puny CPU (not the connection).

      Great solution, I'll take five.

    11. Re:Very nice, but... by eriksarcade · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded down? Its absolutely true!

    12. Re:Very nice, but... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Informative
      How can this be very useful? The C64 has about 32K of useable RAM

      It's actually 64 K of RAM about 51 k of it usable. Most Commodore BBSs swap in and out the various sub-programs as needed.

      and about an 800K floppy

      Most BBS sysops have a hard drive or large RAM drive such as the CMD Hard Drive or RAMLink I started with floppies (which the 5.25" drives were 170 k and the more expensive 3.5" were 800k) but you can only run a text based board (and not a networked one) on such limited capacity.

      ... am I missing something, have they come up with larger mass storage systems for the C64 or something? Hard Drives now can access beyong 4GB (CMD HD), 20x System accelerators (SuperCPU), RAM Drives up to 16MB (RAMLink), and even ethernet interfaces with web browsers (contiki, the wave, etc.) telnet software still in the works.

      (This isn't intended as a troll or flamebait... it's a genuine question....)

      Of all the 8-bit followings the Commodore 64 has been one of the most active and innovative over the two decades since the computer was first produced.

      One girl genius is taking the 64 a step further.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    13. Re:Very nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaah, the good old days - I remember that block of spare RAM above the cassette buffer well...

      The C64`s welcome for assembly language newbies :-)

    14. Re:Very nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, too bad Toronto Computes (Vancouver Computes, Ottawa Computes, Canada Computer Paper et al), got burned and destroyed by Trader.com, the company that purchased them in the mid 90's. Once great publications, now that horrid "digital lifestyle" magazine hubcanada.com. Sad.

    15. Re:Very nice, but... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      ....have they come up with larger mass storage systems for the C64 or something?

      Ummm... I know for a fact you could get mass storage for the C64. They were sold in computer stores in the form of a 10 or 20meg peripheral which was nothing more then a scsi host adapter, and often times an MFM/RLL to SCSI controler. The cooler ones could support 2 MFM drives...I know I bought my 15meg Seagate st-419 in about 1988 for about $300.

      I can speak only from the atari standpoint as far as 8bits with mass storage.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    16. Re:Very nice, but... by yellowstone · · Score: 1
      The C64 has about 32K of useable RAM
      If you're willing to code in 6502 ASM, virtually all of the C64's 64K is usable (*). I once wrote a 6502 assembler that used the RAM 'under' the Kernel image to store its data.

      (*) Some, of course (like the memory used to hold what's displayed on the screen) has fixed use, but most can be used generally.

      --
      150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    17. Re:Very nice, but... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      How can this be very useful? The C64 has about 32K of useable RAM and about an 800K floppy... am I missing something, have they come up with larger mass storage systems for the C64 or something?

      Even 'back in the day' there was mass storage for Commodore 64s. My father taught computer studies at a local high school, and part of his job was managing a network of--if memory serves--sixty or so Commodore 64s.

      The Commodore 9060 and 9090 offered 6.4 and 9.6 MB of storage, respectively. Manual here, for anyone who wants it. Pictures here.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    18. Re:Very nice, but... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn straight.

      I still have a couple of SFDs in my basement. 4,133 blocks free each, a hair over a meg. My 8050, bless it's soul, blew up in the early nineties. (8050 - two side-by-side single-sided SFDs in a 4040 chassis).

      I also have a couple of 4040 chassis lying around intact (except for repairs -- they work), and one which was stuffed full of single-speed Sony CD-ROMs many many moons ago.

      For the parent, The 1541 had 664 blocks free, or about 170K of usable storage. Unless you chose to use track 18 (the directory, track 40 on the SFD/8050), in which case you could eke out a little more disk space.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    19. Re:Very nice, but... by darkgumby · · Score: 0

      I had two or three C64 systems that had an external 20MB hard drive connected.
      Some company had developed a SCSI interface that plugged into the C64's interface port and had some clippies that grabbed onto a couple of places on the motherboard.
      This gizmo created used some sort of funny partition trick to let you access all of that space.
      I used these systems to develop commercial software for the C64 in BASIC way back when.
      Sorry I don't remember more details, it was many years ago.

      The 1541 floppy drive had 360K of storage. Commodore later produced some 3.5 inch drives that I think had more storage space. There were also some memory upgrade cartridges available. I don't remember the capacities.

      For a while I had a PET that had 2 external floppies that each had 1 MB of storage!

    20. Re:Very nice, but... by gklinger · · Score: 1
      You may find the 64HDD of interest. It's a program that when used with an x1541 cable allows you to access your PCs hard disk from the Commodore 64. When you consider that a 5.25" floppy disk formatted on the 64 provided 170K of storage, even the smallest hard disk available today provides almost limitless storage.

      So, dig your 64 out of your closet and have some fun.

    21. Re:Very nice, but... by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      One girl genius is taking the 64 a step further.

      That not only warrants a +6 Fucking Amazing, but a whole story of it's own.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    22. Re:Very nice, but... by Eadric · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a method for hooking up scsi zip drive to a Commodore. Using this method you have unlimited hard drive space in 16 meg drive partitions.

      Another project uses a special cable to allow you to access any PC as if it were a Commodore peripheral. This way you can use your hard drive & cdrom.

    23. Re:Very nice, but... by gklinger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hey James. It's Golan (think back, way way back). Your post took me on a journey down memory (no pun intended) lane. I have much stronger memories of the first Spence BBS program which was equally thrifty with memory. I remember trying to customize it for a friend and constantly banging my head on the desk because you guys had used every available byte of RAM (and then some). The fact that your program was easy to set up and could operate quite nicely with a single 1541 drive made it possible for anyone to run a BBS. It was quite an achievement. Say, what ever happened to Ken?

      And for those who haven't figured the XP part out, X = Xmodem and P = Punter, the two most widely used download protocols at the time.

    24. Re:Very nice, but... by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, IIRC the 1541 was single-sided

      But if you got some scissors and cut little rectangle shaped holes in the appropriate place, you could make the disks themselves double sided. You'd still have to turn them over though, yeah.

    25. Re:Very nice, but... by jetmarc · · Score: 1

      > even the smallest Windows virus won't fit in 32K.

      I once wrote a C64 virus (but didn't put it in the wild). It occupied 9 blocks,
      and if I recall correctly, one block as 512 bytes. It was a "link virus", meaning
      that it attached itself to every file that was executed while the virus was
      resident in memory. It was a kind of proof-of-concept, because back in those days
      link viruses were a new invention. People claimed they could not affect the C64
      (but only "those new" Amiga and PC DOS type of computers).

      The 9 blocks covered only the reproduction code, no payload, and it actually worked.
      It basically added code to the end of the file, and replaced the first few bytes
      by a call to the virus code. A copy of the original first few bytes was kept to
      "fix" the executable image in RAM after making the virus code resident.

    26. Re:Very nice, but... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Hi James, we've never met before, but I'd like to thank you for the Spence BBS. It was hugely inspirational for myself and my friends. I remember being about 14 or 15 years old, tinkering with the source code, learning programming, and having the time of our lives. For me, that was the golden era of computing! .. Back in the day when 416 was the only area code in Toronto! :-)

    27. Re:Very nice, but... by gandy909 · · Score: 1

      **** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ****
      64K RAM SYSTEM 38911 BASIC BYTES FREE
      READY.

      Actually it is 37.9K usable bytes for BASIC programs without any fancy tricks, a lot more for ASM and trickery...

      --

      (Stolen sig) Remember: it's a "Microsoft virus", not an "email virus", a "Microsoft worm", not a "computer worm
    28. Re:Very nice, but... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Yes it did. Search slashdot for it.

    29. Re:Very nice, but... by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, this brings back the memories.

      I sold a few games to a disk magazine (still proud of some of 'em, in fact), and in one I shaved a few milliseconds off the main loop by taking advantage of how BASIC searched for the next line of code after a GOTO or GOSUB: from that line forwatd if the line number's greater than the current line, and from the beginning of the program if less than.

      Also, anyplace where you would use a literal number in the program, you could get extra time by defining a variable as that number ahead of time and using that. But fastest of all, if you were using a literal zero, was just entering a single period instead; BASIC interpreted that as a zero.

      Of course, it got disheartening that you couldn't get any kind of real speed without using assembly. Or worse: my first machine code program was before I got an assembler, so I had to laboriously look up each instruction opcode in the C64 Programmer's Reference Guide! I still remember: RTS is 96, LDA immediate is 169. And um... I think STA was 141. It's because I remember those things that I don't have brain room for verb tenses in my Spanish class!

      Ah, the Programmer's Reference Guide. I still got mine, though it's in bad shape these days....

    30. Re:Very nice, but... by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      Ohh, does this mean I'm qualified to work as a Slashdot editor? ;-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    31. Re:Very nice, but... by Tweester · · Score: 1

      Yeah those SFD's were the bomb. Even if you occasionally had to give 'em 20 minutes in the freezer before formatting a new floppy. Modding CNET 10.0... MCI text... good times... :)

  10. But the question i'm asking is... by g4sy · · Score: 2, Funny

    are they "secure" like the old bbs' were?

    everyone knows that a bbs attracts conspiratist theorists like flies to fido spread over 5km of freeway
    --
    somewhere, on a Big Red Sign:
    if(color==blue){speed--;}
    1. Re:But the question i'm asking is... by diodeus · · Score: 1

      Secure, one of the most popular BBS programs for thr Commodore PET (Steve Punters), allows you to log on as "SYSOP " (the sys admin was called SYSOP back then) and open a new account. It allows all kinds of fun like:

      TO: ALL
      FROM: SYSOP
      SUBJ: THE BBS IS GOING DOWN FOREVER!

      hehehe, giggle.

  11. But do they have a place for .... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ....first posting?

    Actually it'd be interesting if some of the old databases of messages could be restored.... as BBSs carried local events and interesting conversation.... you know before we knew first hand what trolls and flamers were or would become...

    1. Re:But do they have a place for .... by Bobdoer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I take it you never heard of Textfiles.com.

    2. Re:But do they have a place for .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you know before we knew first hand what trolls and flamers were or would become..."

      Are you trying to be ironic there, Tim? ;)

    3. Re:But do they have a place for .... by bwy · · Score: 1

      Actually it'd be interesting if some of the old databases of messages could be restored.

      Hey, you know that is a good idea. As a kid calling BBSs, I really think that the opportunity to communicate with older folks helped me a lot from a maturity/learning/thinking/etc standpoint. It is sad that today it seems like the Internet only causes trouble for younger kids- the sexual predators and stuff. BBSs were a much tighter community, at least in the small town where I grew up. Even if you didn't know the folks at the other end of the line, you probably had common friends.

  12. Wow, this brings back memories by laird · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, this brings back memories. I ran a BBS for years, Bladerunner BBS. It started out running on an Osborne Executive (2400 BPS! 2 double-sided quad density drives!) and then was upgraded to an Atari ST (20 MB SCSI HD, 19,200 BPS Telebit Trailblazer!). The amusing thing was that the CPU in the Trailblazer was much faster than the ST itself.

    One thing I really miss from those days is the sense of community, and the games. I ran a number of games on my BBS, and it was always a lot of fun watching people interact. Unlike modern online games, anyone could write a test-oriented BBS game if they knew a little BASIC, so there were all sorts of cool games. I remember in particular a drag racing game where you could race, earn money, buy upgrades, and compete against other drivers (i.e. other players on the same BBS). The integration of the game into real-time was fascinating -- most BBS games let you make a limited number of moves a day, so people would play a single session of a game for _weeks_. And there were tons of cool timing tricks, like dialing into the BBS at 11:30 so that you'd have the last move before midnight and then the first game after midnight, which could give you a nice advantage (and leave you vulnerable as everyone else moves after you).

    Hey, thanks for the excuse for the flashback. Fun days!

    1. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by laird · · Score: 1

      Ooh, I forgot to mention that the ST ran STadel, an awesome room-based BBS system. Every 'room' had a topic, and could have files, messages, etc. Much, much cooler than the typical command-line BBS's.

      Citadel's had this amazing networking scheme where BBS's could route messages between them so that (like Fido) you could send email (slowly) cross-country with only a series of local phone calls (i.e. free). But it was about a billion times easier to set up, as you simple created a shared room and configured what other BBS' to call to share it.

      I just found http://uncensored.citadel.org/citadel/citanews/new s8706.txt, which recorded the first international Citadel network message, back in 1987.

      And check this out, my BBS is in an old listing. How cool.

      Name: Bladerunner BBS -- Waltham, Mass. USA
      Dial: (617) 891-7338
      Sysop: Laird Popkin (laird@think.com)
      Comm Settings: 8-N-1
      Baud: 300 - 2400 + PEP (Trailblazer Plus)
      Info Updated: 14-Sep-1991
      Notes: Connected to the Citadel and usenet networks (as
      blade.via.mind.org). The BBS runs STadel (a Citadel variant)
      on an Atari ST.

      Topics discussed: Role Playing Games, GURPS, Warhammer,
      AD&D, Call of Cthulhu, Hero/Champions, as well as assorted
      Fantasy and SF and computer-related topics. There are
      also a number of online games, and discussions of SF,
      various computers, and whatever other topics arise.
      There are no online time limits or upload/download rations.

      Ah, that was fun!

    2. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      The amusing thing was that the CPU in the Trailblazer was much faster than the ST itself

      Hardly amusing. The technique of offloading CPU load onto specialized, more powerful (in their own way) specialized coprocessors is older than the ST. Hell, even the blitter could be said to be faster than the 68K in the ST.

      Have you ever wondered what part of your PC does floating-point calculations the fastest? and which one does DSP the fastest? (hint: it's not the main CPU).

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well damn don't sit there and tease us. Hook that bad boy up and give it an IP address, so we can connect and chat about old-school D&D and have flamewars about Amiga vs. Atari.

    4. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and get drunk and cry ourselves to sleep. Oh, sweet memories...

    5. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Since so many sysops around (havnt used that term in years)

      Check out these links.

      http://archives.thebbs.org
      and
      http://bbslist.textfiles.com

      Don't forget to google for Similar pages, if you migrated to PC after the Apple/C64 classic modem BBS'ing, you can find all the Ansi Door games of the past. BTW, you can run door games under linux with dosemu and Linux BBS software for those broadband Tradewar junkies.

    6. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by CaptScarlet22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you forgot to mention the Best BBS game out there, it was called Nuke'em!!!!


      That game rocked!!

      I remember running the "The Phoenix BBS", we were the cracking group called "TBH", The Brotherhood of Hades that was our home page, I was also the warez checker. I'm sure you heard of the "The Phoenix BBS", it was the biggest, 2+ mb....

      It had 2 lines, 2 mega hard drives, 2 more floppy, and it ran and ran and ran!!!!!!



      Well I really miss those days, really. Most of my life, sad to say, was just sitting in my room and playing with my C64, cracking games, running for Garden of Eden (North).....life was just so simple.

      And my handle has never changed...

      Captain Scarlet


      --
      It's left blank because I have nothing to say to you punks!
    7. Re:Wow, this brings back memories by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      Guess what? There are a great many BBSes accessible via telnet these days. So, they are not quite gone. Matter of fact, I run a BBS using Synchronet software for windows. Synchronet is an actively developed, and now open-sourced BBS package (see this page for more info).

      Synchronet was orginally a DOS BBS app, but was ported to Win32, and recently *nix (it will compile on *BSD and most Linux distros, and work is in progress to port it to big endian architectures). In addition to telnet access to the BBS, Synchronet has a built in FTP service for file area access in addition to using the old Zmodem transfer way, and also included in Synchronet are NNTP (for accessing message areas) as well as finger (for inter-bbs instant messaging), and soon a web interface (built in web server).

      Some of the old door game authors are resurrecting their old projects and actively developing their doors again. LORD (Legend of the Red Dragon) is once again under development. I am running the latest beta, v4.07. I am running Legend of the Red Dragon, Barren Realms Elite, The Arcadian Legends, Falcon's Eye, Falcon's Honor, Ambroshia (a brand new door game written in the internet era), several of the Sunrise doors, The Clans, DoorMUD, Sim-BBS, and the Virtual Sysop 3 (ported from TBBS systems).

  13. SWEET JESUS. by aardvarko · · Score: 5, Funny

    And just in case there was any lingering doubt that Slashdot editors might not derive some sort of malignant glee from watching servers go down, now we are posting links to COMMODORE 64s! C'mon, let's be more forthcoming - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, Harnessing the Power of Geeks to Set Protozoan Servers on Fire. BOO-YAH!

    1. Re:SWEET JESUS. by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 5, Funny

      No need to worry-they're all using Epyx Fast Load cartridges.

    2. Re:SWEET JESUS. by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      A while back there was a link to a website on a PIC processor.

      While the iPIC is quite a bit more advanced the Slashdot croud actually contacted the iPIC.
      The connection to the 64 will only permit one connect and after that the server sends out a busy signal.

      All things considered I think the iPIC got hit worse than the 64 ever will.

      Now for the truely retro...
      Connect use the iPIC for the server to an S-100 running an RCP/M BBS.
      (Forget Commodore...)

      And use a Hays 1200 for the modem...
      Or USR robotics 28.8k baud if you REALLY need speed.
      (Yes I know Hays makes faster than 1200 but Hays 2400 and better isn't retro enough)

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    3. Re:SWEET JESUS. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      A C64 running the web server and two instances of VNC server that is now in Contiki, in addition to a RealAudio server, stood up to a /.ing.

  14. and it's as easy... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    ...as sys 49152

    who knew?

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  15. Feels Different by Punchinello · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Commodore 64 BBS is not the same over a high speed connection. I long for the days of my 300 baud modem when I could read the text in real time as it came across my TV screen. It was all down hill after the 1200 baud modems came out.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

    1. Re:Feels Different by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Throttle your connection to 300 bps (NOT necessarily the same as baud - it can be at a 1:1 ratio, as it is on a 300 bps modem, though) at your router. You DO have an old 486 between your cable modem and your desktop, don't you?

  16. Vic20 users have rights too, dammit!!! by TheMadPenguin · · Score: 1

    Well, they do you know ;)

    --
    Mad Penguin

    --
    Linux with kernel panic...
    MadPenguin.org
  17. This is the future of the innurnet! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Funny

    Soon to come: an internet morse code interface for the internet C64 BBS systems, for those of us who really think those 40 columns by 25 lines and 16 colors are a disgraceful novelty item, not worthy of true purists!!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Re:uhh by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    No, old computers don't die ... they just shrink down to a small glowing green dot and disappear.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  20. Commodore 64 huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Triumph the Insult Comic Dog: 'and which of these buttons calls your parents to pick you up'

  21. In case of slashdotting.... by retto · · Score: 1

    Here's the link in case it gets slashdotted...

    last stand bbs minneapolis, mn

    Connecting...

    CONNECTED TO A CENTIPEDE BBS SYSTEM!

    HIT RETURN

    1. Re:In case of slashdotting.... by dr+bacardi · · Score: 1

      You typed that much too fast... slow down and try again at 300 baud.

  22. once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the amount of time people are willing to waste on totally useless crap is amazing

  23. fuk0r by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 0, Troll

    omg you have one disk of a 2 disk game for download AND YOU WON'T PUT IN THE OTHER DISK FUCK YOU&^!)!L:Q210__+2134

    NO CARRIER

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  24. WWIV by BrianDeacon · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to that Wayne guy who wrote the WWIV BBS system (and got the k-rad distinction of being user "1@1")? Quite humbling to the arrogant intellectual bastard in me when I consider that I used e-mail on a BBS system for a couple years, and thought it was "neat" that I could get replies weeks later from people that were 8 or 9 bounces away from me. And not once did it occur to me "What if all those BBS boxes were -always- connected to each other?"

    --

    I didn't pay attention to politics until my country started to scare me. Recently.
    1. Re:WWIV by BillTheKatt · · Score: 1

      Yea WWIV was the bomb. Until everyone started thinking Telegard was great. Someone else earlier wrote about "doors". I remember games like Tradewars and such used to be called "doors" before WWIV but I can't remember which BBS software used that term.

    2. Re:WWIV by Nykon · · Score: 1

      lol, you know, I had the same thought. I ran WWIV for years,from 90-96ish, Nycor BBS in Virginia.

      Anyway, I used to set my dialout, to be immiediate, and had 4 lines running into my parents basement,lol. I swear she thinks I was dealing drugs since she was[is] not technical. Since I was an social e-butterfly, I used 3 lines for dial-in and 1 line for dialing out messages,mail,etc. So most people got mail and recived messages pretty fast,which helped to aid in the spread of the popularity of it,well until that darn internet killed the BBS

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    3. Re:WWIV by laing · · Score: 1

      It was wildcat. Tradewars was a great VR game. I remember spending months playing it (since the BBS limited your play time to some number of minutes per day).

      --
      This space for rent

  25. another day at the k mart by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 3, Funny

    10 PRINT "FUCK"
    20 PRINT "YOU"
    30 GOTO 10
    END

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:another day at the k mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't do much, try

      10 PRINT "FUCK"
      20 PRINT "YOU"
      30 GOTO 10
      RUN

    2. Re:another day at the k mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot: POKE 808,234 to disable the run-stop-restore keys :)

    3. Re:another day at the k mart by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      When I was in high school, just before the national anthem I used to go up to the Qnx machines and enter a quick program to sleep 5 minutes and then start beeping (I forget if I used some kind of playsound API or just printed control chars).

      I was the teacher's pet but he never caught me and he was always REALLY pissed when it went off.

      Sad, aren't I? :)

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    4. Re:another day at the k mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 PRINT "FUCK"
      20 PRINT "YOU"
      30 GOTO 10
      END

      I think by END, you meant RUN? ;-)

    5. Re:another day at the k mart by zcat_NZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back when I was at high-school, we had a 'network'; 16 weird-ass brand computers, connected by 1200 baud RS232 to a Z-80-based 10m 'fileserver'

      There was also a network printer; it even beeped if you sent it a ^G.

      So one afternoon, we carefully crafted up a file full of ^G's and pagefeeds (^L), queue'd the file about a hundred times while the printer was turned off, and went to our next class. Since the network didn't have any kind of 'queue management', nobody had any idea what the problem was and after chewing through about half a box of paper, the printer got sent back to the shop for servicing.

      Good times..

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    6. Re:another day at the k mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use to go in and type poke statements to create a machine code program that changed the colours of the screen for untimed raster effects. And of course locked out the keyboard.

    7. Re:another day at the k mart by varjag · · Score: 1

      Another fun thing to do was to roll the monitor's brightness wheel into full black. Turn the computer on, and OUCH! it's dead!

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  26. While it seems kinda funny... by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's really kinda sad.

    I'm all for nostalgia in some minor way but when do you let it rest? I wonder how many guys are out there praising this move who, the day after they got their x86, were trashing the C=64?

    I still own a working Amiga but even I've come to the point that I'm asking myself; what for? It was great in the day but the day's over. Stop playing Trade Wars and play some MOH so I have another newb I can kick in the nuts...

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:While it seems kinda funny... by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      Who's out there still restoring VW Beetles, or running around with their Hemi? Today's new cars have so much more computing power in them.....

      I know, my state now makes me pay an extra $50/year to have my late model car's OBD computer inspected for proper operation.

      I want my old Beetle back.......

    2. Re:While it seems kinda funny... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      It's really kinda sad.

      The dreams in which I'm dying are the best I've ever had.

      Yup, it sure is a very very mad world.

  27. Parent post is INQUIRING about the TOPIC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And cannot even remotely be offtopic.

    If your reaction to a topic is WHAT THE FUCK that is wholly on topic.

    Please mod up accordingly (and answer, too); thx.

  28. Q-link! AOL! by sleepypants · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until someone writes an emulated version of Q-Link that I can connect to over the Internet. Even better, AOL should open-source the old 8-bit code. Hey, if it works for Netscape/Mozilla, it can work for Q-Link!

    --
    I am Jack's witty signature line
  29. BBSmates.com by W1K-Galoot · · Score: 5, Informative
    Guess it's time for mysemi-annual plug of BBSmates.com. You old-schoolers can look up your old hang-outs, hook up with your old BBS buddies, and see for yourselves that everybody but you aged poorly. :-D

    (And there're a lot of old BBSes available through telnet, though I dunno about C64-based ones.)

    --
    Been using sigs for 20 years. Nothing funny left to say.
    1. Re:BBSmates.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      414...

      Jump Shack is missing, and it was 0-day 37337 GoE.

      W.I.S.E. is missing, the only one that I knew of to move from Color64 to Color128.

      SSG's is missing, but I think that was only up for a week and at odd hours.

      +++ATHZ

  30. Whoa flashbacks. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heres something that might give you a c64 flash back.

    GOOGOOACKACKBADBAD
    Punter :)
    Xmodem-1K and Ymodem-1K
    300 Baud modems you pluged your sound into.
    Sixpack (s2g), Arj, Lha
    4 pixel wide 80 column display on a 40 column terminal
    4 color ansi (And of course Petascii)
    Burping Number 5.
    Dual Sid, playing Skate or Die, Sids rule :)
    Speedload Cartridges, (My fav the Snapshot)
    GEOS and Quantumlink
    Peek and Poke
    Compiled Basic
    Atari 2600 joysticks

    Am I missing anything else? Other than almost every BBS being written in compiled basic, some where written in C. The Amiga where BBS's compiled in C was the rave. Moving on UP. I remember before I got my Amiga, I upgraded to a C128 so I could do real 80 column ANSI, for almost a year during school, I had at least a real ANSI term, DesTerm I recall, even had real zmodem.

    Rusty and Eddies! ;)

    Ok, I should stop now before I go on about moving to PC playing Tradewars on WWIV BBS's and Galaciticom (Before they turned into ISP software.)

    The BBS scene has turned into the IRC scene, now it seems to be the IM scene. Blogs are there too, but I was blogging before it was blogs, so Im blogged out. (Or is Slashdot a BLOG?)

    "Know your roots!"

    1. Re:Whoa flashbacks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      DesTerm is still the best terminal I have ever used for any computer/platform. I miss it. Connecting to anything with it was a thing of beauty.

      I still remember its cascading dropdown menus. Amazingly good program.

  31. Maybe it's just me... by rampant+mac · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I miss the days when Wildcat, iNiQUiTY, Kermit, backbone, "drop carrier" and "line noise" all meant something.

    AT&F&C1&D2

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    1. Re:Maybe it's just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit man, I'm gonna start sobbing! +++ATH0 forever!!!

      Just kidding.

    2. Re:Maybe it's just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT LIVES!!! C-Kermit 8.0

  32. You deserve a "Thanks!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cut my BBSing teeth on boards pulled from that very BBS listing in TC. Used to wait excitedly for the "Big BBS List" to come out every now and then. :)

  33. terminal server by jjeffries · · Score: 1

    It's a [insert old computer here] on a terminal server... one user at a time, just like the good ol' days.

    Remember when the PCers were running multiple copies of their software under Desqview, for a multiline system on one machine? I wonder if you could accomplish the same thing with multiple instances of [insert old computer here] running on your favorite modern OS? Probably lots of file locking (or lack thereof) problems to overcome, though.

    I ran a board for years--taught me a lot, especially about modems and serial communications, and is not a hell of a lot different from my job now, except that I get paid and the modems have gotten a lot faster.

  34. Definition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Am I the only one curious why the submitter used a freaking definition for the C-64. I mean, I realize it's a tad past their prime, but come on...

    Oldbitcollector: I know it seems like every one in here is young and ignorant, but do you really think we're 15?

    I can understand a Sinclair definition a little more, maybe, but a C-64?

    1. Re:Definition? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hell, even being raised on an Apple II when the A2 was already declared dead, I heard of the C64 (especially when I got a 386DX33 (Pentium MMXs were just coming out) with 4MB RAM (I think 16-32 was the standard) and a 14.4 modem (33.6 was quite common then), running IE 3.0 16-bit).

  35. The 1581 drive had 790K by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It used a single sided 3.5" floppy exactly like the double sided ones we have for PCs now.

    Was I the ONLY kid on the block who had one of those drives?

    Back in the old days I bragged about having a combined storage of 1.5 megabytes online! lol. Man, now I have 2 terabytes on 2 networked PCs...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:The 1581 drive had 790K by eriksarcade · · Score: 0

      nope, your not the only one! i still have mine, serial number 192!

    2. Re:The 1581 drive had 790K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I've got a SD drive, too. Still got a box of diskettes for it.

      Really confused the hell out of me--one day (quite a while ago) my father decides he wants to put something on a disk, so naturally he goes for the SD disks, and I didn't realize it.

      Wasted a couple hours on that one, I did.

  36. Correction. by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, it's a very secure system to go on the internet with, for one thing: even the smallest Windows virus won't fit in 32K.

    Not quite true. One counterexample: Win32.Driller, a memory-resident virus which is 8K in size.

    1. Re:Correction. by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what about all those viruses from the C64 spreading to Windows users? Did you think about that?

    2. Re:Correction. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Well, yeah, but it's written in assembler on an ISA with instructions like:
      SORTALPHAFIELDTHREE - sort the first $CX records, beginning at DX, alphabetically, based on the third ^Z-separated string.
      CALCULATEPI - stuff the value of PI, to $CX places, into AX
      FAXBOMB - establish a 2400/8N1 connect to AMD's fax line and sent $CX pages of "black"
      If you can't write a virus in 8KB on Intel assembler, then you ain't a k0d34.
      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  37. fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm tired of RTS and simms games. gimme the oldschool platform games. turrican, lionheart, leander, shadow of the beast, dragon spirit, r-type, agony, project-x, battle squadron, stormlord, gods, lemmings, speedball ii brutal deluxe, etc. etc. etc.
    shit man i could go on all day!
    i'm tired of fucking RTS and simms games and all the fucking polygon lame-ass bullshit they make these days! gimme fucking sprites and nice hand-crafted graphics! the old days were more fucking fun!

  38. Imagine a beowulf cluster of those... by RLiegh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...getting their asses kicked by a lone 286! w00t!

  39. Commodore Like BBS on BSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've been running a Commodore like BBS program on a BSD box for a number of years. It's called The Shack and you can get to it by just a CLICK!

    It's been a fun project and we hope to continue it's development whenever spare time is available.

  40. Re:msg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Sir, Go die you gui loving hippy with your sidecart expansion and AREXX! Regards, C64 user.

  41. Door games? by ValourX · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can play Hack & Slash again? At least this time around I don't have to worry about whether the ultra-fast 14400 line is available...

    -Jem
  42. The old days SUCKED by RLiegh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The new days SUCK

    Face it, computer gaming is for virgin dweebs and hax0r wannabes.

    Put your time to better use; ESPECIALLY YOU mister c64 phr3@k; you've got a wife and kids for god's sake!

    Have some fucking dignity, wouldja?

  43. But... by Fjornir · · Score: 1

    DO YOU SEE A BLOOD RED SWORD?

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    1. Re:But... by diodeus · · Score: 2, Funny

      YOU SEE A RED DOOR TO THE NORTH
      (I called my character A RED DOOR TO THE NORTH)

      > Open red door

      I DO NOT SEE A RED DOOR HERE.
      A RED DOOR TO THE NORTH STRIKES YOU, INFLICTING 30 DAMAGE.

      (I also liked to call my character "1l1l1lll11")

  44. Apple IIgs? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's been done. 2002. Just not up now, unless it is running at another address somewhere.

    But I haven't heard of any earlier Apple IIs being accessible via Telnet, and not any `GBBS "Pro"' systems.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Apple IIgs? by Zutroi_Zatatakowsky · · Score: 2, Informative

      That BoycotBBS is no longer at that adress. Google has a link to "http://boycot.no-ip.com/boycotbbs" but it's not working anyway. So I guess BotcotBBS is dead.

      For a goot Old School BBS, you could always try : it's been running for 18-19 years now. You can connect using telnet or phone lines, just like in the old days. This BBS fulfilled by computer addiction when I went offline (not enough money) for 6 months, 2 years ago. Glad it's still there, just in case. :)

      --
      All Hail Discordia. Hail Eris. Fnord.
    2. Re:Apple IIgs? by Zutroi_Zatatakowsky · · Score: 1

      Holy schmuck, look at that formatting. Guess I'm too drunk, sorry.

      --
      All Hail Discordia. Hail Eris. Fnord.
    3. Re:Apple IIgs? by Pentomino · · Score: 1

      I think I remember calling a GBBS Pro when I was in junior high, around 1992. It wasn't Year-1990 compliant, so it reported the year as 198:.

    4. Re:Apple IIgs? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      it was probably vapourised by the slashdot effect

  45. Oh, give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lots of uses". Yeah, right.

    And who the hell wants to browse the web on a 14.4 modem?

    1. Re:Oh, give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And who the hell wants to browse the web on a 14.4 modem?

      The kind of people still using a C64 and BBSes?

    2. Re:Oh, give me a break by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      And who the hell wants to browse the web on a 14.4 modem?

      I did for a long time when I was an impoverished student and couldn't afford a faster modem (cue violins).

      Actually, it wasn't all that bad unless the site had a lot of java or flash in it.

  46. Citadels were the best! by uptownguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I, too, loved Citadels. Something about the no nonesense approach, just text messages will all those lovely, lovely ROOMS to explore. You can, of course, still find them around today. Whether they have the same feel/flavor is an entirely different subject, of course. Check out the Uncensored! BBS at uncensored.citadel.org. It is running Citadel/UX on a Linux system so you can still feel proud to check it out, even if you're too young to have experienced BBSing the first time around.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  47. DUDE! by mog007 · · Score: 1

    Here's an example of an underrated +5 insightful post: DUDE! THIS IS SWEET! Seriously though, this has some nice implications... just think of all the fun we can have, and now at broadband speed! No more pre-14.4 speeds for me!

  48. Yaaay. Now I can go back to... by shoolz · · Score: 1

    ...forums packed with charged conversations such as:

    "Mmmm... jello"
    "Jellllllloooooo"
    "I like jellolololololololo"

    No thanks.

  49. Re:Q-link! AOL! by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? They're probably still USING that code.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  50. Doing same on Vic20 by Felinoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having writen BBS programs for the Vic20. C64 and C128 (Actually same program evolved as I switched systems.. Also ported to Dos and would have gone to Linux but the BBS died on Dos as the phone company ripped out the wires to my phone line and offered to charge me to fix there own mistake.
    Intrestingly enough I wasn't supprised to discovere I had no callers. I was only supprised as to WHY)

    If the trick is handled all on the PC side (and I expect it is) then it dosen't matter.

    If they are doing it the way I think
    (Commodore userport to RS232 to null modem to PC sereal (rs232) then PC forwards to telnet etc...) this should also work on the Vic20.

    For that matter it should also work for CP/M, Apple II, TSR-80. Pritty much any old BBS.

    Dos BBSes can be done on the same Linux or Windows box that provides the Internet access making it much easier.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
    1. Re:Doing same on Vic20 by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the linked articles (PETscii.com) had a listing of TelBBSes, running on various platforms (mostly C64/128s, but there was an Atari, and some Apple II and Commodore-based BBSes emulated on Windows, Linux, and (!) Amiga.

  51. Anyone want to do the same for Apple ]['s? by darthcamaro · · Score: 1

    I used to run an Apple ][ BBS, I wonder if I could do the same - and if I'd actually get any traffic. Any takers?

    1. Re:Anyone want to do the same for Apple ]['s? by cbm_dude · · Score: 1
      As the author of one of the packages listed on the site (tcpser, a Linux modem emulator/ip bridge), I wrote the software to be target machine agnostic. The software, which can be run as a daemon, simply emulates a standard recent vintage Hayes compatible modem on a ttyS of your choosing. So, any platform will work fine. The cable is a tad tricky, as you need to take a regular null modem cable, cut the target DSR line and loop it to target DTR (Some/most BBS's rely on DCD high to signal carrier detect, so the easy solution is to use PC DTR line to simulate it.) Although I doubt my very rusty C skills will stand up to ./ scrutiny, I run Linux and the other app on the site is a VB app. Thus, tcpser.

      tcpser has the option of emulating multiple modems on one TCP port, which would allow a multi-line BBS (the accept gets sent round-robin style to the next open modem-emu instance. Since the story hit, I suppose I need to upload newer code (since the old code is truly hideous...).

      However, there is more utility in these apps than running a BBS. Old black box units expecting a real modem could now be hooked to a PC without code changes (just change the dial number to X.Y.Z.A:port)

      Still, in true hacker fashion, I did it because I wanted to learn serial programming on Linux, my sockets skills are very rusty, my C skills have fallen into disuse, it was there, and although I welcome the web, I do miss a good local chat on a BBS.

  52. Getting old systems on the net... by oldosadmin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  53. Ah, memories... by jxliv7 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    .

    I remember my C=64 with fondness. I should, I paid $495 or so...

    There was a guy I found who was building 1 meg of RAM expansion slots, I thought I was on top of the world. And when i got my 3.5" 1.44 Mb floppy drive I almost peed my pants.

    I forget the program, but I set up my C=64 to be a BBS for the real estate office I worked in. You could NOT tell you weren't on a PC (286/386) of the period.

    I wrote my first book on that machine, printed it out on a Star printer, and published it.

    And there WERE a few BBSs around with more than one phone line, not to mention a national BBS I think called Q-Link(?). I took courses on that big BBS up in Virginia(?) with a dozen other peolple on line. And who could forget "Windy City BBS"?

    1. Re:Ah, memories... by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      I picked up a C64 the other week on eBay for $30. Now would probably be a good time to resell it.

    2. Re:Ah, memories... by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Funny

      >> a national BBS I think called Q-Link(?).

      They later moved to the PC market and changed their name to America On-Line. I hear they might still be in business.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Ah, memories... by DangerSteel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I still have my original Q-link disks. : ) After some time co-running a C-64 BBS (we were the only guys in town with a 10 meg HD on our BBS) I remember Q-link being my first experience with avatars on a computer. You could join Club Med I think it was called, a tropical island like area to chat with others.

    4. Re:Ah, memories... by Pentomino · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for someone to hack together a Q-Link server, so that QuantumLink will rise again. I was too broke to use it when it first came out.

    5. Re:Ah, memories... by hswoolve · · Score: 1

      And before Q-link was People Net.

      Someone brought some C-64's to a scifi con many-many years ago. Wow, networking, chatrooms ...

      I feel old now.

  54. You think that's bad... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    I've got a PET 2001. Way to leave me and my legions in the dust.

  55. Postage Stamp sized processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I connected a 286 to the internet, and also a Mac LC II. Both of these could only access text pages, such as provided by the National Weather Service. If you went to a site such as yahoo.com, you essentially got turned away, as your postage-stamp sized processor was detected, as well as your tiny motherboard. Really. The NWS didn't care, so you got your text. Found out that you needed some power on your end to get snappy downloads, and if you didn't have it, then you wound up with something like 26 bytes per second, if that. Both of those boxes hard drives had to be prepared on later-model machines so they could get on the internet. Installing the software was nearly impossible on them. Used MS-DOS/Arachne 1.70 on the 286, and Mac OS 7.5.3 on the Mac LC II.

    1. Re:Postage Stamp sized processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are decent browsers available for a 68k Mac, especially with a relatively "modern" MacOS like 7.5.x. Why were you limited to text pages?

      Versions 1 & 2 of Mosaic, MacWeb, and Netscape should all work fairly well.

    2. Re:Postage Stamp sized processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to think of it, the LC II is a 68030 Mac, so Netscape 3 & 4 should work great on your machine.

    3. Re:Postage Stamp sized processors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, iCab is a relatively-modern (HTML 4) browser that will run on 68k Macs. I run it under Basilisk II all the time.

  56. OT: Das Blinkenlights by Jayfar · · Score: 1

    ACHTUNG!
    --------
    Das machine is nicht fur gerfingerpoken und mittengrabben.
    Ist easy schnappen der Sprinngwerk, blowenfusen und
    poppencorken mit spitzensparken.
    Ist nicht fur gewerken by das Dummkopfen. Das rubbernecken
    sightseeren keepen hands in das Pockets.
    Relaxen und watch das blinkenlights...

    http://www.textfiles.com/100/actung.hum

    Hehe. %-) First saw that back in '74 at a datacenter with an IBM 360/30 (though I know it goes back further).

  57. History Lesson by Prototerm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Nothing in this world is new, stupidity in particular.

    Commodore was unbelievably stupid, and made some things harder for programmers. For example, the C-64 and C-128 computers both had a software-emulated UART chip, instead of a real one (to save money, as I understand it, about $5), limiting the baud rate to how fast the computer could process code in what was called a "non-maskable interrupt". The C-64 allowed a max of 1200 baud. The C-128, because it could run at double the clock speed of the C-64 ("Fast Mode", or about 2Mhz), could in theory run at 2400 baud, but you had to write your own version of the UART emulator using well-optimized machine language. Faster connection speeds were out of the question.

    As the author of a few C-64 programs (e.g., "Prototerm"), I can't tell you how many times I wanted to drive to West Chester, and strangle someone. Nowadays, of course, I periodically get the urge to strangle a person or two in Redmond. Fortunately, it's too long a drive.

    Nothing every changes, just the names and faces.

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
    1. Re:History Lesson by Chordonblue · · Score: 0

      And until the A1200/A4000 series, the UART's sucked on the Amiga as well. Use too high a resolution whilest getting a burst at 14.4K+ and you'd miss some data.

      Of course... This sort of thing happened all the time in Windows 3.1 and that wasn't NEAR as much fun! :)

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    2. Re:History Lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Imbezol is right! I was co-sysop of an Amiga BBS that could easily clip along at 56K *WHILE* doing housekeeping (or logged in on the main console). Sometimes, we'd even be playing games while someone was logged in.

      As for the C64, you COULD go faster than 2400 (about a hair over 2660 bps, IIRC) using "Bob's Term Pro", which allowed you to tweak the timing values. However, not many BBSs/modems used such weird timings, so 2400 was about it. Later, a hardware solution that came in a cartridge form (which was just the UART that CBM left out) allowed 14.4Kbps.

      And as for those who say "Why?" - you're all missing the point. We had to start somewhere, and it's nice to know that we can go back and visit once in a while. Besides, where's the real "hacker spirit" that is supposed to pervade slashdot?

    3. Re:History Lesson by teeker · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken. First, the c64 was plenty capable of 2400 baud. I still have mine, along with my Aprotek 2400 baud mini-modem. It always worked fine on my c64 (the really old brown one even)...what an upgrade from 300 (remember the old Commodore 300 baud that could do 600 baud if it was talking to another Commodore modem? wow!)

      Also, the reason there wasn't a "real UART" is because UARTs are for serial communication, and the user port on a c64 was a parallel interface. The CIA (called a u2 IIRC?) handled it, and it worked very fine, thanks. Also while I'm already off topic, it should be noted that the PCs of the period (and I presume other machines) that actually had "real UARTs" used NMIs to read data as well, the same way the 64 did. The buffer was just 1 byte, and if the processor didn't pick it up before the next one arrived, it was lost, just like the 64.

      --
      teeker
  58. slashdotted? by ocie · · Score: 2, Funny

    READY
    LOAD "HTTP://WWW./PETSCII.COM/",8,1

    HTTP 404 SITE NOT FOUND
    READY

    so anyway, I just had to add this little bit to get aroung the lameness filter. So, how's that Internet thing doing?

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  59. To be realistic by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...they better be limiting the throughput to 300baud. Good old days when you could read "in real time" ie. you could read as fast as the data came through the modem - no need for this scroll bar bullshit.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:To be realistic by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      1200 is the most l33t speed at which to r34d!

    2. Re:To be realistic by MagerValp · · Score: 1

      Set recvdelay = 5 in the config file (cgterm.cfg or ~/.cgtermrc) and you'll get 250 characters per second, which is pretty close to what you get on a 2400 baud modem. Though most C64 BBS:s online are already connected over a 2400 baud connection, so there's no need for a delay on the client :)

      --

      READY.
      #
  60. Why Commodore BBSes ruled. by Pentomino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been waiting for Commodore BBSes to return to the net for a long time.

    The thing I liked the most about Commodore BBSes was the color and graphics. Every BBS had little custom color schemes and graphical flourishes here and there. And, of course, the phreakers' boards had the most flamboyant designs. With the popularity of ASCII art today, you can just imagine what Commodore users could accomplish with PETSCII, and what Atari users could accomplish with ATASCII now that you mention it.

    Color64 and C-net boards had a charm that was hard to match.

    1. Re:Why Commodore BBSes ruled. by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      ATASCII was some crazy shit! With that character set you could make some really intricate curved borders, although not in as many colors.

      A lot of the color stuff lives on in the IRC Undernet though. The first time I saw Undernet I just started laughing. It certainly gets your attention!

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  61. Is that all? by empaler · · Score: 1

    I used to dream of snow each morning as I had to carry my parents to work over blistering lava, after which I had to lick the lava clean of whatever I left behind...

  62. 6502 Assembly by bender647 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got the Assembler cartridge! But I can't remember the entry point to run it. Back to read data, poke data looping. :(

    1. Re:6502 Assembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC Sys 49152 will do the trick.

    2. Re:6502 Assembly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, /.: yeah.

  63. Re:Yaaay. Now I can go back to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how's that any different from threads packed with stuff like:
    - *BSD is dying
    - beowulf clusters natalie portman statues from soviet russia
    - GNAA ascii logos and membership signup text
    - first post / you fail it
    - penis bird
    - trolls (the real trolls, the ones who pretend to argue/debate/discourse, and just waste your time)
    and so on...
    Not to mention a really fucked-up moderation system.
    And besides, those ANSI (or color ASCII gfx depending on the platform) were pretty damn sweet. Maybe it's just me, but the who GUI thing hasn't even done anything for me. Last GUI that I liked at all was Amiga OS 3.0...

  64. Ahh the memorys by Felinoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah..
    First BBS I logged into was a DYM BBS.. I was too young to log in and I lied.
    It didn't work out.

    Then I logged into the Forth BBS in SanFransisco. Your command prompt was actually in forth.
    The way forth works is you can add commands so the BBS fuctions were just new commands. I think they locked off the programming features (makes sense but I never tried to edit the BBS so I don't know).
    I remeber the ongoing story of Murphy Law of folly forth. I just folowed the story as it progressed. "Folow the yellow diod"...
    (Being an impressionable kid I actually refered to going to the bathroom as "dumping my buffers" for a while. As in "I gotta go dump my buffers" while dancing the "gotta go to da bathroom" dance)

    Later I had access to some RCP/M and RBBS bbses. The downloads section was just dropping you to a secured prompt.. (think restricted Unix shell where you can't do much) run xmodem filename.ext and then download the files you wanted.

    I always thought of Commodore BBSes as limited but secure. Oh boy I had everyone and there brother trying to prove that wasn't the case. Nobody ever hacked into my BBS but I knew it had nothing to do with Commodore.
    It was that I wrote the program and every time someone TRIED to hack in I changed the code.
    (Staying one step ahead is the ONLY way).

    There were three reasons people tried to hack my BBS.
    1. I once called it uncrashable. I never did that again once it went into a crash recrash loop.
    2. I was sereous about the no cuss words policy (that went away when I hit 18. Mommy might not approve)
    3. I ran my BBS on a Commodore 128.
    Actually worse than that MY software tried to addapt to the user and often failed.
    So I had people hacking my BBS who thought I had an Apple II, a TRS 80, a PC and any number of platforms people didn't like.
    I also had one guy yell at me becouse his 300 baud modem connected to my 1200 baud as a 300 baud.
    (Some 300 baud modems let you go faster but the other side has to have the same kind of modem and support the hack. I didn't)
    And then there was the guy who accused me of stealing his BBS look.
    (His was a brand new BBS and I know my BBS changed it's apperence at least twice while he was online just to accomidate his poking and proding)

    But that was the worst of it.

    However when I want to remember the good old days I log into my Linux box and go into the command line.
    Then I smile.

    Then I type the old forth BBS commands and they don't work.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  65. Waxing nostalgic about Commodore BBS's... by BobWeiner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...my very first introduction to local Commodore BBS's was shortly after I purchased a Datalink 2400 internal modem for my Apple IIGS.

    One of my dad's coworker friends ran a board called "The Ivory Tower", and passed the info along to me. Let me tell ya, up until that time, I had no idea how my life was going to change. I miss the small community feel of old BBS's like "The Ivory Tower".

    I remember also the frustration of hearing those blasted 'busy' signals when trying to call up a popular board. As I made my way around the various BBS's of Knoxville, TN, I came across "The Volunteer BBS" -- it was one of my favorite hang-outs -- it was a PC based BBS, but they had great online games like Millway's Casino and Tradewars 2002. With the Internet being so global, it's getting harder to find such cozy little places to hang out anymore.

    Bring back Millway's Casino!

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
  66. What it needs to make it really authentic... by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is a 2 meg Flash animation that mimics letters slowly appearing on a green screen at 300 baud.

    W E L C O M E
    T O
    T H E
    C O M M O D O R E
    P I R A T E 'S D E N

    1> Warez 2>Chat 3>BBS System

    >?

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  67. one line, save some bytes by BlastQuake · · Score: 1

    1 ?"FUCK":?"YOU":GOTO 1 RUN Of course, it would be oh so much more fun to have the program rewrite itself mid-run using the dynamic keyboard method.

    --
    "What use is power to the Keeps of Balance?" -Disnt of Nightmare LpMud
  68. Online ZORK by fsandford · · Score: 0

    Only if there is an online interactive ZORK

  69. Those were the days by moltar77 · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone else out there who remembers playing World War III on Commodore BBS's? I'd love to play that game again. It was so simple, but who could resist the joy of nuking your buddie's country?

  70. But will today's computers bring back memories? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    The C64 brings back fond memories to me, also. It was my first computer. I started with the BASIC, then spent days and weeks trying to figure out that assembly language stuff... Good fun.
    The Commodore was such a fun computer, you could really get into its guts. Today I look at kids playing with their computers, and it seems like all their knowledge is superficial. If they're really good, they can edit the registry or make their own web page.

    Are today's computers more boring, or does it just seem that way because I'm older now? Do you think anyone in the future will try to create a windows XP emulator just for the heck of it? Does anyone actually miss windows NT?

    (Of course, linux is still fun :)

    --
    Qxe4
  71. Forget Internet; drop back to dial-up BBS by Senor+Wences · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My parents got an Apple ][+ with a 300 baud modem when I was in third grade, back in 1982. I remember the "Cracked" screens with the phone numbers for the BBSs of the pirates who had cracked the games I was playing (Drol, Snack Attack, Taipan, Escape to Atlantis). I also found local 'boards' where I would read what everyone who had logged on before me had posted in the various 'rooms' that I was interested in and I would reply appropriately. I can't remember downloading any warez, though early pr0n was available on CompuServe and my friend John and I racked up an inexcusably large bill after 'downloading' all night. My best friend Jason and I convinced our parents to buy us Mac 512s in 1985, when we were in 7th grade. Jason's parents moved during junior high and he got a second phone line installed and started running a BBS on a Mac Plus he'd picked up for the purpose.

    I remember me and the other geeks who logged on (and who spent time redialing when somebody else was tying up the single phone line) pushing the BBS software Jason was running to the limit; the big hit was being able to fuck with the text display and simulate "animation" by forcing the page of text you were reading to refresh by issuing different backslashes in the text posts. Dumb shit that would take over your text display until it played itself out, but which was amusing nervertheless.

    It's an awesome idea to transmorgify the internet to a C64 BBS, but just imagine a website that tracks either realtime (i.e.. http://npds-tracker.continuity.cx:3680) or better yet just lists possible BBSs and lets people with the old school hardware break it out and dial up to phone numbers that might or might not be busy. There's nothing quite like the end user experience of old BBS software whatever the OS it ran on; I propose the excitement is better created by setting up real BBSs on original hardware as a better alternative to trying to connect old, old boxes to the internet. I for one would consider the thankless process of getting an additional phone line to set up a dial-up BBS on my trusty Mac Plus (formerly a Mac 512 before my roommate pour a beer through it when I cut him off on Tetris) with a HD20 and a 33.6 modem should the demand be there (and methinks it probably isn't).

    Wouldn't it best be experienced as it was originally experienced?

    --
    End of Line
    1. Re:Forget Internet; drop back to dial-up BBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, remove the added capabilities one would gain by putting a classic-style BBS on the Internet, that sounds good. We don't want to be able to place the board on an already existing Internet connection. We don't want people from all over the world, never mind the country, visiting our board. We want single-user BBSes. We want busy signals.

      Or, a PC around P133 vintage can be connected to the Internet via broadband, and using Linux, host a multi-node BBS for next to nothing. No extra phone lines.

      The Internet has the capability to enhance the BBS concept many times over. I'm looking into setting up my own Telnet BBS, I've got just under 50GB of hard drives laying around that I can use for a file area. As a matter of fact, the mere concept presented here (C64 boards on the net) actually popped into my head the other day, although it went no further than 'hey, it'd be cool to set up a 64, connect it to a pc, and run a bbs on the internet'. But I wasn't so much a C64 BBS fan as just BBSes in general, one of my fav boards ran TAG.

  72. C64 bbs for Linux by rabbitear · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I wrote a BBS program for Linux, that tries to be Retro like, ASCII color and 40 column text, but no IBM style >128 text. Its been running via telnet for the past 3 years at: 'velvet.ath.cx'

    slate :o-

    --
    tHe sHacK! bBS (telnet://velvet.ath.cx)
  73. Well, BBS systems are making a general come back.. by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

    ... and I should know, for I run a modern day BBS (see .sig below). Have a look at this BBS software suite and you will see that the world does indeed have a great open source BBS suite that runs on both Windows and *nix. Telnet has done away with dialing in, and also does away with long distance charges. If you look at this page , you will see that there are quite a few Synchronet systems in existence with new systems coming online and connecting into DOVE-Net almost weekly. (DOVE-Net is the QWK message network that is supported and run by the author of Synchronet). Also, thanks to telnet doing away with long distance charges, we have many large inter-bbs message and game networks today. (Of course, good old FidoNet is still around, too, with most nodes interchanging mail via telnet these days).

  74. Whoa... memories... by nsxdavid · · Score: 1

    I can't believe it. Someone actually recorded the fact that these things existed. Ok, I believe that. What got me was that one of my very first contributions to the net is there: Fantasy Roleplaying BBS (FRPBBS). I wrote that for the C64 and it was my first real "thing" if you know what I mean.

    It lead more-or-less on a straight road to writing GemStone I, ][ and III, and thus the company I now run. But to see someone record that FRPBBS existed, brings a tear to my eye. :)

    Yeah... we all have slashdot now... but I was flaming back in the day when 1 user online was the max and THATS THE WAY WE LIKED IT! (smile)

    --
    David Whatley
  75. Who says BBSs are dead? by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Several folks have mentioned that they miss that 'sense of community' that BBSs brought - well it's not like you can't get that sort of community anymore. There are still plenty of BBSs out there that _do_ have an active community of users. OSUNY ssh://osuny.co.uk is one of them. BBSs are still your friend. :)

  76. Only seen on Slashdot? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Users can "dial" using a standard 64 connected to the Internet

    I guess Internet-connected 64's are considered "standard" among geeks. Personally, I don't even have a clue on how to do it, and don't really care since I have no longer got a C64 either. :-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  77. Accurate History by imbezol · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both you and the parent poster obviously don't have any actual experience with the machines. I ran a bulletin board on a C-64 using a 2400 baud modem for years. Further more, the local computer shop ran a massive multi-user bulletin board a couple years later and all the computers in the store were hooked to it. The Amigas were connected at 56k and worked flawlessly as such.

    1. Re:Accurate History by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

      Er, I had plenty of experience with the Amiga at least.

      Note, I did not say that the Amiga would not connect at serial speeds of 56K or above. What I did say was that if you used a high resolution (640X400X16 interlaced, I believe) while attempting to do so, you'd be missing data.

      The UART's in the 500/2000 series Ami only had an 8 byte FIFO buffer - which was fine as long as the system didn't struggle to keep it empty. At higher resolutions it became an issue since, unlike machines like the IBM/PC and C=64, these modes had to 'draw' the text on the screen. Amiga had no hardware character-based graphics at those resolutions - it had to be drawn in software.

      So... The result was, if you tried to use high res with a fast stream of data - you'd be missing some. This is of course assuming that you were using a stock machine. Accelerator cards helped with this as did the newer AGA chipsets on the 1200/4000 series.

      Still an unbeliever? Check this:

      http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF -8 &oe=UTF-8&c2coff=1&safe=off&selm=3ea7nl%248tl%40cr l5.crl.com

      This guy had it right.

      --
      "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  78. The Game of Life? and a 1541 that makes music! by qualico · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember a game called,
    "The Game of Life"?

    Also, there was a program that when run, would make the 1541 belch out a tune.
    I was a very cool!

    I miss my C-64 days. :..

  79. LORD! by smu+johnson · · Score: 0

    Ahh.. new comers to the computer scene in the last couple of years... let me tell you a tell when I used to charm the pants of Violet at the Inn...

  80. Amazed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're new to Slashdot, aren't you?

  81. Hahahaha! by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

    And you all thought that the C64's days were numbered! Nyah nyah nyah, I got ya kinda, I got ya kinda! Now I just need to learn how to connect my breadbox up to the ethernet. Might be interesting, considering the thing was developed when you still called a modem a "Mo-Dem."

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  82. M.P.U! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "step further" a.k.a. "C=1" ( c64upgra.de/c-one/ ) ... jebus!

  83. Damn it's not working by Napoleon+Blownapart · · Score: 1

    sys 64738

  84. SYS64738 by Mobster · · Score: 1

    Ah.. my youthful days as a "Commie". I remember them fondly. Calling the local BBSes and leaving anonymous posts calling this one person a very unkind name.

    And Phoneman! What a program! Wardialer and Terminal all in one! Even Red and Blue box tones!

    Ok.. I melted the wax of my nostalga. Gonna go back to my Amiga BBS now.. :)

    --
    ---- You have been programmed by the Illuminati to not see the word ""!
  85. Not impressive enough. by 68K · · Score: 1

    Let me know when someone does it on a Spectrum 48K. :-)

  86. Re:Yaaay. Now I can go back to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, and the discussion HERE is so much better isn't it? Like 3000 posts saying "First Post!", "Hot Grits" and other associated nonsense is somehow better? Slashdot has the heaviest moderation system I've ever seen--no BBS was ever that bad.

    Get over yourselves Slashdot.

    And for what it's worth, BBSing is alive and well on the internet. Synchronet (www.synchro.net), Citadel/UX (www.citadel.org) and even MysticBBS (www.mysticbbs.com) all have thriving communities. And yes, we all talk about you behind your backs.

  87. I can see it now.... by vgaphil · · Score: 1

    The next big MMORPG.....

    Lemonade Stand!

    --
    A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
  88. The benfit of 300 baud by Markvs · · Score: 1

    As a longtime user of 8-bit PCs back in the day (Video 7 modems, anyone?), 300 baud was perfect for the old systems. Why? Easy.

    **300 baud is the speed you can read at when receiving text from a BBS! ***
    The 110 was too slow, the 1200 was great for games (LORD, Trade Wars/Yankee Trader anyone?), but you kept having to hit PAUSE to read posts! This was a big deal, since back then a 2-5 page post (remember, 40 columns!) was pretty common. Especially if you had a heated message board discussion or a PBMB RPG (play by message board role playing game).

    It was a much different world when e-mail only worked on the BBS you had your account on.

    -Markvs

    --
    46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
  89. Way too much effort. by douglips · · Score: 1

    The holes didn't need to be rectangular. You just had to use a hole puncher to punch a half circle where the rectangle would be.

    The only advantage to making a rectangular hole is to fool your friends into thinking you could afford double-sided disks.

  90. My 9600 baud modem is dead... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    My 9600 baud modem is long dead - and good riddance, I say.

    I have no desire to relive the BBS heyday when there are some many new projects that need attention...

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  91. Electricity Cost by meehawl · · Score: 1

    a 33Mhz system with a 14.4 modem actually has a lot of uses. It'd make a decent (but very low bandwith) home firewall

    Great idea... as long as you are not paying for the electricity. Compare the monthly cost of running a 486-ish system to a modern, $20 hardware router and you talking about a difference of several hundred dollars over several years.

    --

    Da Blog
  92. Cool by falsification · · Score: 1
    This is really cool. I still remember my own BBS days.

    Kids of the next generation should have a chance to know what it was like.

  93. No, not right... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    He's NOT right about the Amiga. High resolutions/color combinations will KILL your connection speed on the old A500/2000. Please read my reply post with a decent reference from a knowledgeable user.

    I NEVER said that you couldn't do 56K on the Amiga. I said you had difficulty maintaining 14.4K whilst doing it in 640X400X16 interlaced. THAT is a fact, not fiction.

    Now I ask you, how often did you use that hires mode? Probably not very - interlaced graphics suck at TV refresh rates. This explains why most people never saw this as a problem or even knew about it.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  94. No AA BBS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not satisfied until someone puts up a AA BBS system with Empire!, perhaps the greatest game ever known and I can slaughter you all with my empire of 99999 serfs!

  95. Re:Well, BBS systems are making a general come bac by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    My IP address is "banned"? *whimper*

  96. Re:Well, BBS systems are making a general come bac by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

    Where are you coming from? I had a lot of "hack attempts" (though unsuccessful :) and I went on an IP banning spree. :/

  97. C64 was simple.. by rofthorax · · Score: 1

    It was just simple, that's why it was popular.
    What I didn't like about it at the time was that to access any hardware in it, you had to flip bits in memory, (poke/peek), they were so efficient with rom they chose not to include subroutines for accessing sound and graphics in a user friendly way, like on the Atari's. But you did have more memory to work with, and the sound was better than the dinky Atari's which had nothing but square waveforms to screw with.

    The C64 used a 6502, which is said to have been a RISC processor, it was to be used as a I/O controller, but in the C64 it was made to be a cevtral processing unit. In the Apple IIgs the 6502 was used as a I/O controller at 10 Mhz. In the C64 it ran at about .5 Mhz . At the time I would have loved to have a 10 Mhz processor, IBM XT's were selling for 5000 dollars and were about 4.5 Mhz. And the IBM's had a maximum memory limit of a megabyte, which was like a lot of memory in those days. But the IBM's were monotone graphics and had a single voice sound output.. Besides nobody would ever use one to play videogames until FM sound cards and EGA graphics were introduced. But by that time everyone had Amiga's and Atari ST's..

    It wasn't until the PC's had windows, and VGA graphics, with soundblasters, that everything switched.. And people started jumping platforms to get the PC.. I got my first PC when In was already in college, about 9 years ago. I had come from a dieing Amiga 3000 with 50 meg HD and 6 megs of ram.

    But I think about the days of the C64, about all of the wierd and interesting stuff, and how it was so much fun to experiment with. Like to play with the SID based synthesizer, and to use paint programs.. I once took apart an Atari Joystick, took the IC card with the bubble buttons, and wrote a program in basic to record and playback drum sounds, using the joystick input to record the button presses.. It would have been better to have something like a Simmons drum for input, but they cost thousands of dollars, and MIDI hadn't even been invented yet. I'm sure if I had had some electronics experience, I would have made my own drum kit and used the C64 as a sequencer. The thing that is bizarre about the C64's is that some musicians still use it as a sequencer.. MIDI data doesn't require a whole lot of space so you could still use a C64 to controll a keyboard setup and drum machines..

    Anyhow..

    PS- Did anyone have that program for the C64 floppy drive that plays "Daisy" by rattling the disk heads?

    --
    Just say no to license servers!!
  98. Re:Well, BBS systems are making a general come bac by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

    T-Online, a big German ISP (*.dip.t-dialin.net); you might be blocking lots of German users, but I should be studying anyway :)

  99. *.t-dialin.net ban lifted due to good behavior.... by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

    Yeah, mass blocking isn't a great thing... I have lifted the block on *.t-dialin.net since the logs are showing less hits from your ISP lately. If you're still interested: telnet://bitbucket.homedns.org