Slashdot Mirror


More On The Open Sourcing Of Iraq

popdookey writes " The BBC's broadcast, The World, has run a piece on the growing Linux movement in Iraq as was previously reported here on Slashdot. 'In Iraq, a group of computer users has started writing open source computer code. They're Linux enthusiasts. The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries. It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future. The World technology reporter Clark Boyd reports.'"

287 comments

  1. after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    now bill gates gonna invade iraq too

    1. Re:after bush by essreenim · · Score: 1

      I wonder which OS Osama uses, hmm...

    2. Re:after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Probably vxWorks or QNX. His dialysis machine needs a hard-real time OS after all.

    3. Re:after bush by arjun · · Score: 5, Funny

      microsoft is waaaay ahead of you, check thisout !

    4. Re:after bush by elfstones · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      While Bill sends in his troops, we can only hope they wear "US Microsoft Employees" on their shirts. This would be a guaranteed method of taking the heat off of the US military troops.

    5. Re:after bush by nabil_IQ · · Score: 1

      I'll suicide Linux his forces

      --

      Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
    6. Re:after bush by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rest assured, if there is in any way whatsoever, any connection at all between these coders and bin Laden, not matter how ridiculous(their mothers,fathers,cousins,friend passed by a stall where an apple(not a mac) was purchased by someone who SAW the nefarious criminal, SHOCK!) , Microsoft will use it to say that Linux supports terrorism.

      Wait,wait...sorry. Microsoft will get SCO to use it to say that Linux supports terrorism!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS-ama... duh.

    8. Re:after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the 200,000 murdered under the Hussein regime? How quickly you peaceniks forget...

    9. Re:after bush by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. Microsoft will go the extra mile and get Dick Cheney to say it.

      Cheney will say anybody is a terrorist - except Halliburton.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    10. Re:after bush by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      and of course, plastic.com's logo for Slashdot is a jihadi Tux!

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    11. Re:after bush by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... whose graves are mysteriously not turning up.

      The largest mass grave had under 2,000 bodies in it, and these were from the 1991 Shia uprising. There have been about 50 of them found so far, most of them small (50 bodies), and most of those dating to times of war or uprising.

      Tony Blair gave a figure of 300,000 and credited it to the UN. However, his figure came from HRW, which is not UN affiliated, and HRW stated that their figure was simply a pre-war estimate based largely on talking with Kurdish sources and asking them how many were "missing" dating as far back as the Iran-Iraq war.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    12. Re:after bush by Rei · · Score: 1

      Erm, the previous post ate my less-than sign. It should have read (less-than 50 bodies). While some of the graves have been found by talking to locals, many of them have been found through satellite imaging, since there are different minerals below the ground and on the surface in most parts of Iraq, so you can tell where the soil has been disturbed.

      I can provide references if needed.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    13. Re:after bush by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of those 2,000, A) They're not 200,000, and B) most of them died in a revolt.

      In case you're not familiar, most of the OFF "documents" came from the oil ministry, which was run by a Chalabi associate. Go on, go into more detail about OFF! Please! The far right's rage over a story that they know so little about is always amusing.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    14. Re:after bush by msh104 · · Score: 1

      the one running the sco kernel.

    15. Re:after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's what Microsoft calls a partnership :-)

    16. Re:after bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are those 2000 lives worth more than the 11,000 Iraqi lives lost since the US-led invasion?

    17. Re:after bush by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I was watching him the other and thinking "any second now his pants are going to actually catch on fire".

      --
      evil is as evil does
    18. Re:after bush by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Which makes it most ironic that there are two mass grave sites outside of faluja. Both of these used to be soccer fields. One contains over 300 bodies and we are not allowed to know how many the other one contains. I believe that the final death toll there was around 700 so maybe it contains the other 400 people.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  2. Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Phekko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Iraq is anti-US. They code Linux stuff in Iraq. Ergo, Linux is anti-US. Bomb Linux!

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    1. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Iraq is anti-US.

      What, do you mean even after we've bombed the shit out of it, shot the shit out of it, and tortured the shit out of it, they are still anti-US?

      What the fuck?

      Goddamn ungrateful motherfuckers.

      I say we bomb the place.

    2. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Iraq is anti-US.

      Wrong.
      US is anti-Iraq : AFAIK, Iraq never invaded nor bombed US.

      They code Linux stuff in Iraq.

      GCC/GLibC-compliant would be a better assertion.

      Ergo, Linux is anti-US.

      This however is true :
      US = United Corporations (Microsoft, GM, Enron, Monsanto, etc.)
      Linux poses them a genuine threat as it counterbalance their marketing approach and very few besides Linux shall survive without changing business models.

      Bomb Linux!

      How do you bomb software ?
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by ozbird · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. Microsoft is US, Iraq doesn't want the US invading their country, ergo Iraq doesn't want Microsoft invading their country.
      Linux is the logical solution - and the price is right. :-)

    4. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You mean Iraqi's are now getting tech jobs?
      pre-war they had 1 million soldier employed, now they employ what 100,000 soldiers? The economy there is bad for ex killers or skilled labor workers from what I hear, but the tech is booming, doctors, teachers, educated people are seeing double and triple thier old incomes. It's possible this war could change iraq into a technical competitor. Now if only the U.S. could pay our own teachers here triple....

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    5. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by syn3rg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The attempted assassination (April 1993 in Kuwait; 11 Iraqia arrested) of an ex-president (and yes I'd feel the same if it had been Clinton) is internationally accepted as an act of war.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    6. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I feel sorry for you. You must be one of those poor unfortunate souls that happened to be born without a sense of humor.

    7. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by hugzz · · Score: 2, Informative
      Iraq is anti-US

      Wrong.
      US is anti-Iraq : AFAIK, Iraq never invaded nor bombed US.

      A lot of the world is anti-US. Doesn't mean they're bombing or invading the US. That isn't the definitive guide to who is or isn't anti-US

    8. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 0

      to be born without a sense of humor.

      No, it's rather because I have one that I felt sorry for the thread's parent.
      If you consider it was funny then I think you'd better get a life because it was not.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    9. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of the world is anti-US.

      Or maybe it's just the US which is paranoid because as far as I see here in Europe, we just pity you for having such corporation, or testosteron-driven presidents.

      Really : we like American people, we felt sorry for you when 2 planes hit the WTC, we even told you at this time, if you do not remember how compassionate we sincerely were, then you definitely have a problem.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    10. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by hugzz · · Score: 1
      Or maybe it's just the US which is paranoid

      No really, I'm not American.

    11. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wobblie · · Score: 0, Redundant
      How do you bomb software ?

      In CAPITALIST WEST, the SOFTWARE bombs YOU!

    12. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      So now that's why we invaded? Took us a while to act on that one...

    13. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took us a while to act on that one...

      Just take until his son get White House. It's a personal problem but Iraquis & USians lost their lives on it.

    14. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by syn3rg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, but it was just one more reason.
      Seventeen UN resolutions (of which ANY member could enforce), constant AAA fire on coalition aircraft in no-fly zones, unwillingness to destroy or show records of destruction of WMD's (which are well documented, and are beginnning to be discovered), hostility towards neighboring countries (Iran, Kuwait, Israel), harboring known terrorists (Abu Nidal, Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, Abdul Rahman Yasin), sponsoring Palestinian suicide terrorist's families in neighboring countries, and I'm sure there's more. And thats not even counting numerous human-rights atrocities committed against the Iraqi people.
      The man was rightly deposed by the international community (sans France, Germany, and Russia -- whom we discover later had lucrative, possible illegal, contracts with Iraq).
      So with all that, I ask: Would you prefer Saddam was back in power?

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    15. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Meor · · Score: 0

      Linux poses a genuine threat? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahaha Ohhhhh mercy, that's a good one. Haha, Enron. Oh man, this stuff is good.

    16. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      You mean Castro?

      Oh, wait, he's currently in charge in Cuba - nothing "ex" about him.

      My mistake.

      (Heh, heh)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    17. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, MANY MANY American's are very thankful for the help and compassion of Europeans. And we appreciate how many Europeans dissented against the Iraq war (we did here in the US). We will never forget it.

      My wife and I took a trip in June, 2002 to Germany, Switzerland and Austria because we wanted to bridge the gap between Europe and the US. It was a wonderful experience and I'd love to go back again.

      The US is a paranoid nation (The 9/11 should make anyone a little more paranoid), and our president is out of control. But please remember, we all make mistakes. There is a really good chance that President Bush won't be reelected.

    18. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "which are well documented, and are beginnning to be discovered"

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

      Now THIS guy is a complete fucking moron!

      Here we see the corrosive influence of Fox News on /.'ers!

      Not ONE fucking WMD has been found in Iraq! Not ONE!

      Period!

      You complete and utter idiot!!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    19. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 1

      Linux killed OS2 which was already endangered by Windows.
      Linux killed Novell Netware.
      Linux killed Irix.
      Linux killed many alternatives to Windows, in fact.
      So Linux is a threat to non-Free software makers.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    20. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mirko · · Score: 1

      I guess he refered to the "records of destruction", not to the WMD themselves.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    21. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by chris_mahan · · Score: 0

      Except of course for the artillery shells containing Sarin (which happens to be a WMD), one of which was almost used as a roadside bomb in Iraq (was found and defused by US personnel).

      See article in Time Magazine.

      Of course, calling people idiots and morons is not a good sign.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    22. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far left? for suggesting that the WMDs that haven't been discovered, haven't been discovered?

      That is a "fox news" approach: use Ad Homs when the facts are against your firmly held ... illusions.

      the one antique from a decade ago is not the tons of WMDs that were about to be launched against the USA and required killing 10,000+ human beings to prevent.

      Remember: Fox news, and the onion, are entertainment sources - not information sources.

    23. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? (Score:0, Insightful)

      Ahhh, gotta love slashdot moderation. :)

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    24. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wwest4 · · Score: 1
      Sigh...

      > Seventeen UN resolutions (of which ANY member could enforce)

      The US mostly regards the UN as irrelevant - isn't it hypocritical to be using resolutions as an excuse for aggression?

      > unwillingness to destroy or show records of destruction of WMD's > (which are well documented, and are beginnning to be discovered)

      Can you cite sufficient references to weapons that were not destroyed, and those records beginning to be discovered?

      > hostility towards neighboring countries (Iran, Kuwait, Israel)

      Again, since we have been quite hostile toward countries, isn't it a bit hypocritical to cry foul? Israel has also been the aggressor against Iraq (Osirak reactor bombing). The US ambassador implicitly allowed the invasion of Kuwait. clicky. The US backed Iraq in its agression against Iran and tried to spin Iraqi civil rights atrocities against Iran because it was convenient. clicky.

      > The man was rightly deposed by the international community (sans France, > Germany, and Russia -- whom we discover later had lucrative, possible illegal, > contracts with Iraq).

      So Germany, France, and Russia maintained trade ties, possibly illegally (again we suddenly care about "International Law" when it suits us), and we busted in and introduced our trade ties from behind a gun barrel (possibly illegally). Economic interests are always in the background, and no one is disputing that. The difference is that France and Germany, in particular, haven't been using military means to accomplish their strategic and economic objectives. To do so is reprehensible.

      > Would you prefer Saddam was back in power?

      To do so while pretending there is another reason is also reprehensible. If the US cared primarily about deposing dictators and stopping humanitarian crises, there are many other countries with worse situations than pre-Bushite Iraq. Why not them:

      China, Pakistan, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Swaziland, Malawi, Namibia, Rwanda, Congo, Colombia, Indonesia

      The answer is that it's not in our interest at this time. Even Syria and the DPRK are in the background now. Besides, we don't have a good track record when intervening militarily. The poorest countries in the Western hemisphere are those we've messed with (Nicaragua, Haiti) and Afghanistan is in the middle of a humanitarian crisis. Iraq has been even since the US and UN got involved in Gulf War part I.

      So would I feel good with Saddam in power? No. Would I feel better than now? Yes. When Saddam ordered gas attacks under the then-unflinching eye of the US, he killed 7000 of his own people. We have killed maybe 20,000-50,000 of his people, and about 600 of our own, and the ensuing humanitarian crises have affected (read: shortened) the lives of millions of Iraqis. Millions. That's hardly an improvement.

    25. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Yeah! I mean, if the US had attempted to assasinate Saddam and even made it a policy goal, there might have been justification, but... .. oh wait....

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    26. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean the thing that was at its very worst a depleted chemical so far gone that its side effects were "nausea and dialated pupils"

      Congratulations everyone: We've found the "Weapons Of Mass Inconvenience" that we invaded Iraq for. We can pack up and go home!

      A single shell of what is at *worst* decayed-to-the-point-of-worthlessness chemical weaponry that has undoubtedly been sitting in some field for the past decade is nothing. The US has chemical weapons shells strewn across testing ranges in several parts of the country; Iran and Iraq were in a *chemical war* with each other, and you expect this third-world banana republic to know where every last one is?

      When you're not looking "at worst", one might be cynical and note the fact that the US has proclaimed "WMD FIND!!!" about 50 times thusfar in this conflict, only to be later proven wrong with each one. The rate of false-positives with soldier-carried WMD detectors is god-awful, and the mobile labs are simply "pretty bad". The big problem is that organophosphates tend to show up as nerve gas, and other phosphorous chemicals as blister agents, unless studied in a fully equipped stateside/base-side lab.

      Lastly, some loony in our country - a first-world, wealthy, *relatively* uncorrupt nation - managed to acquire and send anthrax to dozens of people. Are you saying that in some backwoods country like Iraq, with a very educated workforce, an equivalent (and even far less successfull) thing couldn't be done?

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    27. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Rei · · Score: 1

      As an American who also dissented, all I can say is:

      Three cheers for Good Ol' Europe!

      Thank you for trying to hold the US back. Perhaps next time, we won't ignore our friends across the pond when they raise serious objections.

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    28. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Doctors Flee Iraq (the Iraqi bloggers out there have been writing about this, too... pretty much everyone with a good educational background who can are leaving. Mostly not due to the insurgency, but due to the kidnappings/crime/instability/checkpoints/power/et c.)

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    29. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq is anti-US

      At this point this is like saying The US is anti-US. The country is fucking occupied if you haven't noticed by now dipshit.

    30. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      Maybe sarin gas is classified as a potential WMD, but this crude IUD made from an old shell certainly was not capable of mass destruction.

      It was expected that Iraq would be an archaelogical site for WMDs, since they admitted to having them and claimed to dispose of them... the case for war was based on a claim that Iraq had an active stockpile and/or weapons program - neither claim has panned out, and one shell containing pre-formed binary sarin doesn't constitute a stockpile or weapons program by any stretch of the imagination, especially considering that we now have a backstage pass to the entire country and we've only encountered one. Hardly a big deal. This was even stated by our own weapons inspectors. And the administration isn't bleating too loudly about this either. Bush said we'd find a smoking cannon, and he knows as well as anybody that this isn't it.

    31. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by mikeg22 · · Score: 1
      Except of course for the artillery shells
      Shells? Plural? Try again. One shell, probably left over from the Iran/Iraq war, and definitely not the product of an active weapons program.
      one of which was almost used as a roadside bomb in Iraq
      Almost used? It was used as a roadside bomb, which clearly indicates these idiots found the thing and had absolutely no idea what it was.
    32. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      > That is a "fox news" approach: use Ad Homs when the facts are against your firmly held ... illusions.

      Thank you for so brilliantly illustrating the Ad Hominim attack.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    33. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since everyone else has covered other bases, while missing an important one. I should mention that the "no fly zones" were not legal. There is no international law supporting it. So, basically, you're saying the war with iraq (part deux) was good because if we violated their airspace, they shot at us, or threatened to. and that was...wrong? what the fuck...

      They were still a soveriegn nation, not our bitch, like they are now.

      what baby? more money? damnit woman!

    34. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah man, if they were looking for a chemical so far gone it just caused nausea and dialated pupils, I could have gotten them a hookup for that.

      billions for bad acid. (new band name?)

    35. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      --
      Wrong.
      US is anti-Iraq : AFAIK, Iraq never invaded nor bombed US.
      --

      Iraq is anti-Iraq. Or you think it's a productive thing to sabotage your own oil pipelines, assassinate rival clerics, attack the red-cross, and car-bomb your own police stations?

    36. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Beat me to the punch.

      The article I saw specifically talked about doctors and other Iraqi professionals being targeted as "kidnapping for ransom" targets by the local gangs.

      As usual, those who can leave a bad situation, will (mostly) leave a bad situation. A few patriots will stick it out until they too get targeted or end up paying protection monies.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    37. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I say we bomb the place. .. again.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    38. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Tobias+Luetke · · Score: 1

      # su -
      # echo "bam!" > ~/bomb
      # mount /boot
      # cp ~/bomb /boot/vmlinux
      # halt

    39. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by karearea · · Score: 1
      WARNING!! Tinfoil hat time!! :-)

      Well of course it makes it easy to find and defuse when you planted in there in the first place :-) Through lack of real evidence the only option was to plant something to make it look like there was WMD in the country.
      AFAICT - the US has the worst terrorists of the lot leading the country (or at least their puppet masters are those leading the country) - invading countries for no valid reason etc. With their hoard of nuclear wepaons I would say they also come close to having a ridiculous amount of WMD themselves!!

      When is the US's war on terror going to start bombing themselves???

      Just a highly contentious and opinionated thought :-)

    40. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Swaziland

      Swaziland? What has their leader done, other than marry lots of women?

    41. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      amnesty int'l summary for 2003:

      "The independence of the judiciary and the authority of the courts were seriously undermined by government officials and police in a number of cases. The security forces continued to enforce long-standing restrictions on freedom of assembly and association. Journalists were ill-treated and harassed when reporting on gatherings viewed by the authorities as political. Women were denied access to social and economic rights through discriminatory laws and practices. Asylum-seekers, including children, were detained in harsh conditions."

      These are the conditions that were evoked to gain support for the overthrow of the Taliban.

    42. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Seventeen UN resolutions (of which ANY member could enforce...

      The US mostly regards the UN as irrelevant - isn't it hypocritical to be using resolutions as an excuse for aggression?

      You should also point out that Iraq's arch foe, Israel has been guilty if defying this handsomne list of fourty-something resolutions, number far exceeding that of any other country on the planet. Somehow I dont see Bush and crew getting ready to bring "regime change" to Israel.

    43. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Except that the article also mentioned that all of the other shells had a hole drilled in them (forgot why) and the assumption is that they didn't drill into this one because they knew what was in it.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    44. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Assuming of course that in fact there was any such thing - which, given that the report from the US military came EXACTLY at the time the torture scandal was heating up, almost certainly means that the report is entirely bogus.

      Any *independent* reporter actually see this shell?

      I didn't think so.

      The OP must be the only moron left on the planet outside Rush and Ann and Bill who still think there are WMD's in Iraq. Even David Kay, the CIA asshole Bush sent over there with the intention of FAKING the fucking evidence had to come back and say he couldn't find ANYTHING! What the hell more do you morons need?

      And now they're STILL trotting out the crap about Saddam and "Al Qaeda" which has been discredited a hundred times by just about everybody on the planet.

      People are beginning to describe Bush as a "dry drunk" who can't think straight and is dangerously unstable. This guy makes Nixon at the height of Watergate look calm and cool.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    45. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      Even if someone wanted to, they couldn't bring forceful regime change to Israel legally, since all of the actual UNSC resolutions Israel has defied invoke Chapter VI of the UN charter. This means they don't carry the threat of force, as do the mostly Chapter VII resolutions aimed at Iraq.

      Why Israel is immune to Chapter VII is that the US, as everyone knows, has long been a staunch ally of Israel, and we use our permanent security council member status to veto any draft resolution which directly threatens the interests of our close allies.

      This illustrates a practical consquence of the structure of the UN - it is very effective at dealing with violations of its principles from a non-permanent member of the security council, while it is powerless to deal with violations of its principles from permanent members of the security council and their proxies.

      So the UN is far from irrelevant to world affairs in general, but it is indeed quite irrelevant when it comes to the actions of a permanent member and its close proxies.

      It is also irrelevant to a moral discussion of "why." The UNSC is merely a political apparatus that frees us to act however we want as a nation, given the means. It constitutes immunity from international cabals or any real sort of international law - an inalienable sort of sovereignty, in stark contrast to the non-permanent members who don't have the benefit of being de-facto protectorates of the permanent members.

      Of course, the ability to act freely can't logically serve as a justification; otherwise, anything is permissible. So the whole debate about security council resolutions is very interesting as a technical international legal issue, but bogus in the context of Americans trying to collectively steer our nation as a moral agent.

      That debate doesn't show signs of ending anytime soon, and relies in part on some reconciliation or resolution of the conflict between Kantian ethics and utilitarianism. It's probably not even that simple, but that would be a good start. As the above thread indicates, stuffing all of the seemingly related issues into a crucible and getting to what is relevant is one of the problems. All of us are guilty at one time or another of chasing something that ultimately doesn't affect the issue.

    46. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      The economy is bad for everyone except foreign contractors:

      "The scale of the task facing the United States and the international community in Iraq has been highlighted by the first detailed figures since the conflict ended on the state of the Arab country's economy.

      Iraq's economy will shrink 22% this year, having fallen 21% in 2002 and 12% in 2001, the United Nations and the World Bank have estimated.

      The figures, which have been published ahead of a major meeting of donor nations, suggest that reconstruction work in Iraq will be slower to take effect than originally hoped.

      Average income in Iraq fell from $3,600 per person in 1980 to between $770 and $1,020 by 2001 and will be just $450-610 by the end of 2003, the UN and World Bank said.

      Even by the end of 2004, the two organisations estimate that average income could be lower than in 2001."

      Iraq's economy declines by half

    47. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1
      Why Israel is immune to Chapter VII is that the US, as everyone knows, has long been a staunch ally of Israel, and we use our permanent security council member status to veto any draft resolution which directly threatens the interests of our close allies.

      I was merely pointing out this hypocritical stance and the selective use of "UN resolutions" as a war cry of the various Crusaders. I call them Crusaders since the religious insanity is the only motive that is left standing after all the other secular ones were demolished by facts one by one as time went by. Also while the Iraq resolutions were primarily a result of the "security council", a useless and corrupt body that indeed turns UN into a tool of the US (since other members seem to lack the singular drive for world hegemony at any cost), many of the Israel resolutions were passed by the General Assembly with vote counts like 174 to 2 (Israel and US opposing). UN will not be an effective operation of any sort until there is a sweeping reform abolishing the "permanent members" and their vetos and making the security council a democratically elected body.

    48. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting why Europe doesn't have the same appetite for destruction as the US. Primarily, I think, it's because they've had war on their soil fairly recently in the public memory, and they have lost their fervor for diplomacy at the end of a gun.

      Anyway, one thing is true whether we like it or not - an evolution of the UN to a more democratic structure can't peacefully occur without a paradigm change sweeping over all security council member states, especially the US. Again, this reduces to an internal, mostly moral debate for the member nations, and the structure of the UN isn't really relevant - it might be a good indicator of where we stand, but it's not representative of the core issues that led us here.

      > UN will not be an effective operation of any sort until there is a sweeping
      > reform abolishing the "permanent members" and their vetos and making the
      > security council a democratically elected body.

      The UN is effective against non-SC members who aren't protectorates, which is not a bad start.

    49. Re:Now this is proof enough, don't you think? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Well with over $8,100 per year, per student spent on education, with an average of 25 students to a class, I don't see how teachers don't make more than 30-35K a year on average.. :(

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  3. OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Iraq is downloading communism! Torvalds for president! Stallman for information minister!

    1. Re:OMG by guile*fr · · Score: 3, Funny

      HURD will crush the hords of penguins, daemons will bath on their blood, Redmond will burst into flames?

    2. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stallman will have a hard time prying that from bagdadbobs hands

    3. Re:OMG by Unique2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see it now:

      "There are no Microsoft infidels in Baghdad. Never!"

      --
      No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
    4. Re:OMG by JaJ_D · · Score: 0

      Iraq is downloading communism! Torvalds for president! Stallman for information minister!

      And I assume McBride for the Disinformation Minister

      :-]

      Jaj

    5. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq is downloading communism! Torvalds for president! Stallman for information minister!

      And ESR for the army!

    6. Re:OMG by Fillup · · Score: 1

      > Iraq is downloading communism! Torvalds for president! Stallman for information minister!

      Man I miss the days when dotcoms like modern humorist actually produced content regularly.

      --
      "I think there is a world market for, maybe, five computers." __ IBM Chairman, 1943 __
  4. Nice blurb by beacher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's just nice seeing a linux article (featuring Iraqis ) that doesn't paint Linux users as terrorists. Don't let Didio interview them, she'll spin an article like "Iraqi Terrorists create KJihad which is what we knew all those Linux users were up to anyways. "

    Nice blurb. Hope Iraq recovers just to face the same job market as over here. Sorry... Yes, someone already peed in my cornflakes.
    -B

    1. Re:Nice blurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just nice seeing a linux article (featuring Iraqis ) that doesn't paint Linux users as terrorists

      But with PhotoShop I'm sure I can!

    2. Re:Nice blurb by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      I imagine the Iraqis would love to have the same job market as the US at the moment. In case you haven't noticed the job situation is a lot worse in Iraq than it is in the US.

    3. Re:Nice blurb by Talking+Goat · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add that Slashdot's "blurb" failed to point out that "The World" is actually a co-production of the BBC, PRI (Public Radio International), and WGBH in Boston. I know that the broadcast in my area is carried on NPR, but actually distributed by PRI. If you're looking for decent international news, sans wacky right-wing skew, you'll dig "The World."

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    4. Re:Nice blurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      If you're looking for decent international news, sans wacky right-wing skew, you'll dig "The World."

      Should read more like: "If you're looking for decent international news, with wacky left-wing skew, you'll dig "The World.""

    5. Re:Nice blurb by timeOday · · Score: 1
      It's just nice seeing a linux article (featuring Iraqis ) that doesn't paint Linux users as terrorists.
      I agree that's nice. What I think is even nicer is to see a blurb about Iraqi people living a normal life, developing their minds and industries, excercising free association, instead of getting blown up, tortured, starved, or gassed.

      Even though I think the Administration's rationalization for the war was a sham, I still think a lot of good could come from it it if the new government becomes stable and protects freedom for its citizens.

    6. Re:Nice blurb by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "if the new government becomes stable and protects freedom for its citizens"

      Which new government would this be?

      The Quislings run by an ex-Baathist-thug, former Saddam assassin, CIA asset Allawi?

      Or the phoney elected one they intend to put in place next year - presumably headed up by the same Allawi?

      It has been said for months that the Bushies intended to find a new Saddam-like strongman to put in place - just like they did the original Saddam, who was a CIA asset for years before he assumed power. Well, now they've done it - again.

      And the Iraqi people know it.

      Unless Sistani can force truly open elections, there is NO chance any Iraqi government will be stable - or protect freedom. And it's questionable whether even an openly elected one will protect freedom - or survive both internal insurgency and external CIA/Mossad manipulation.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  5. Grass roots, corporation-free democracy? by mennonot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My favorite quote from the founder:

    "I wanted to find people to share knowledge with; to learn from them; to speak with guys who share my thoughts."

    He also talks about how the use of open-source software preventing the monopolization of the market by corporations, a big issue in all economic spheres in Iraq right now.

    Sure it's idealistic and a long way off for most Iraqis, but it could be the seeds of important alternatives for the Iraqi people.

    And finally a good sign: "Microsoft refused the be interviewed for this report."

  6. if you are rich and play games...... by gadget+junkie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    it' Windows(c). if you want it to work, it's Linux.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  7. Linux report as WMA audio file by Advocadus+Diaboli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to listen to that report, but unfortunately I did not yet discover how I am supposed to playback a WMA file (Windows Media Player format) on my Debian box. :-(

    1. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Alranor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does mplayer not cope with wma files?

    2. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Debian doesn't include mplayer...but you can still download it from their website.

    3. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      use vlc (apt-get install vlc), it plays wma files out of the box.

    4. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about everyone else, but I have two programs, xmms and mplayer. mplayer has never failed to play, absolutely perfectly, any video file I ever throw at it. Which is more than I can say for any windows video player. Likewise xmms does not fail to play any audio file I ever throw at it. If yours doesn't, maybe you didn't choose the right options at compile-time or maybe you are using a binary distro that didn't add those things in for you. Either compile them yourself from source or use a source based distro like gentoo or lunar linux. However I do have a friend who runs debian and his mplayer/xmms is as good as mine. Maybe you just don't have the codecs installed or something?

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    5. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where is the sourcecode / licensing information for this free wma codec?

    6. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      There's been a debian mplayer .deb for ages... it's on one of the unofficial archives.

    7. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by dave420 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So we're supposed to believe linux's video codec support is better than windows'? You've never heard of directshow filters, have you? Windows dynamically selects the most appropriate filters to render the video/audio/subtitles/whatever. You have complete control over these filters, by the way. If you want to convert an MP3 to a wav file, you can drag'n'drop these filters in the right order, and it'll convert the format for you. It even gets new codecs off the net automatically. Windows provides that functionality to any application that asks for it. That's right - one single, solid way of processing multimedia in your computer. Not tens of individual packages and bits of software loosely tied together to work. If you're going to bitch about windows, at least pick an area it doesn't trounce Linux on. sheesh.

    8. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Linux report as WMA audio file by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1

      Of course you can point us to a DirectShow-compliant RealVideo and RealAudio codec? And of course WMP will auto-download filters for Ogg Vorbis, XviD and Sorenson (the old QuickTime video codec)?

  8. They work fast by neilmoore67 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a, IIRC, recently formed Linux user group in Iraq: http://www.iraqilinux.org/ IMHO it's a good change for open source to make an impact if Iraq's public services are going to have the opportunity to make a fresh start on handover.

    --
    You've probably noticed that people's noses get bigger as they get older. That's because old people are huge liars.
    1. Re:They work fast by isorox · · Score: 1

      They might work fast, but only because they didn't have to dig up their 5 year old PC from the back garden first?

    2. Re:They work fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's a good change for open source to make an impact if Iraq's public services are going to have the opportunity to make a fresh start on handover.
      The first part of your post was informative, but if you meant the "handover" that is expected within days, that is just plain science-fiction!
    3. Re:They work fast by gokubi · · Score: 1

      It's a lot faster if you don't have to dig up your computer before you install Linux on it.

      --
      I'm much funnier now that I'm a subscriber.
  9. Import restrictions? by LondonLawyer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought there were restrictions on exporting Linux from the US to Iraq (which somehow mysteriously don't apply to MS)?

    1. Re:Import restrictions? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Possibly the cryptoloop stuff, but remember that Linux is a global project.

      That's why distributions like Debian distribute encryption-related stuff from servers outside the US.

    2. Re:Import restrictions? by 1s44c · · Score: 0, Troll

      I thought there were restrictions on exporting Linux from the US to Iraq (which somehow mysteriously don't apply to MS)?

      Maybe the regulations only affect secure software?

      So import linux from elsewhere.
      There are mirrors worldwide.

    3. Re:Import restrictions? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I just remembered...there's an exemption in US law for open-source code. Odd as that may sound. Someone have a link?

    4. Re:Import restrictions? by gedeco · · Score: 1

      After the bombings by the US coalition, the iraqi fixing their houses have a desperate need for new windows. I'm sure somewhere, the translation to English got it wrong.

    5. Re:Import restrictions? by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 2, Informative

      The exemption is for source code in general (as opposed to binaries). So you can ship $DISTRO with the full kernel and gpg sources, as long as you include neither cryptoloop nor gpg in binary form. It's a rather strange law...

  10. Developing countries by locarecords.com · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It is very interesting to see how developing countries are looking at Linux and other open source software as a means to leap-frog over technological problems and to create their own home-grown technology industries.

    I have just got back from a conference in Slovenia at Cyberpipe which was full of Linux and open-source enthusiasts developing software that was situated locally.

    And of course, there are also political and economic implications of Linux as it allows countries to avoid the costly licensing problems of Windows etc and also avoid the reliance on the US for closed technologies.

    There were some extremely innovative lo-tech hi-tech solutions to problems. For example re-use of old 8080 PCs with Linux installed to control various devices - one in particular was a 12 bank screen for projecting images using old black and white monitors.

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    1. Re:Developing countries by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      If anyone actually made Linux on an 8080 CPU, I'll _really_ want to know how. For whoever isn't an old dinosaur like yours truly, the 8080 was an 8 bit CPU and could address a total of 64 KB of RAM. (Yes, that's _kilo_bytes, not megabytes.) It also boasted speeds in the low single digit MHz range.

      Now maybe you mean 8086, but even then... if anyone actually got Linux to run on anything lower than an 80386, I'd really want to hear about it.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    2. Re:Developing countries by locarecords.com · · Score: 1
      More info about Slovenia from

      CIA Factbook

      Oh and the conference for anyone interested was the HAIP conference.

      --
      ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    3. Re:Developing countries by antic · · Score: 1

      There've been stories on Slashdot in past months about Linux in China, and with good reason. Yes, piracy over there is rife, but the Chinese are patriotic enough to build a kind of national pride in doing something differently to the Americans and their Microsoft dependence. They also have the discipline to learn and develop with a new operating system and the concept of open-source software.

      The chief threat, I think, stems from that same national pride in their rush to show that they can "do corporate" just as well as the Americans or Europeans. I'm not sure what the overall status of open-source/Linux awareness is amongst the technologically aware in China, but it might be that an opportunity has passed?

      International competitiveness is huge in China recently -- around Beijing, for example, you'll see endless signs touting ISO numbers. It's similar in Vietnam (which could be ripe for open-source and Linux in general).

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    4. Re:Developing countries by Chep · · Score: 1

      8080: amen!

      8086: uCLinux

    5. Re:Developing countries by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, uCLinux doesn't support the 8086, but try ELKS. (reference)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    6. Re:Developing countries by Chep · · Score: 0

      d'oh! you're right, of course. ELKS it is.

    7. Re:Developing countries by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      UZI runs on the Z80. AFAIK you could probably hack it to run on an 8080, I don't think it uses anything special. It is basically a pretty complete 7th Edition Unix kernel.

    8. Re:Developing countries by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      It is very interesting to see how developing countries are looking at Linux and other open source software as a means to leap-frog over technological problems and to create their own home-grown technology industries.

      But they aren't, tho'. Initial development of Linux was funded by the Finnish taxpayer, and it ran on hardware developed in the US, relying on a compiler also developed in the US. Sure there are bits and pieces developed outside of the "developed nations" (no pun intended). Brazil, for example, is an enthusiastic adopter of open source. But, where is the OS developed from the start in Brazil? Where's the processor designed and fabbed in Brazil? Where's the Brazilian compiler that has C keywords in Portuguese? They don't exist.

      Maybe it'll change someday, but right now, there are no home-grown technology industries outside the developed world, and if they all rely on imported tech, there never will be.

    9. Re:Developing countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developing countries? Hell, if this strategy is good for the Middle East, why not the Middle West? Wisconsin ain't so hot on the high-tech despite what the politicians like to say. That whole dot-com bubble thing never really made it here, and they're still crowing about biotech even as biotech companies implode.
      It doesn't make much sense for everybody to be sending their tech dollars to the West Coast (or India) when we could be paying programmers right here to work on open-source projects. But as it is, Iraq'll probably have us beat in high-tech in only a few years...

    10. Re:Developing countries by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Well, various other flavours of Unix are a different story. Unix or some variant have been ported to pretty much every single computer ever made in the last 20 years or so. The parent poster explicitly said Linux, though, which is why I was asking.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    11. Re:Developing countries by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Yeah. Although, if you can get ELKS to run on the 8086, you should be able to get it to run on the Z80. And, if it runs on the Z80, it *might* run on the 8080...


      The 8086 only does a couple of things more than the Z80, in terms of 16-bit operations, after all.

    12. Re:Developing countries by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      I've programmed both in assembly, so, yes, I have some idea of what they can do :) I'm not concerned with what the ALU can do with 16 bit operands. At the very least you could always take the same C code and generate Z80 code out of it, instead of 8086 code anyway.

      I'm concerned with space. One thing the 8086 does do, and the Z80 doesn't do (or not natively), is being able to address up to 1MB of RAM via segment registers. Somehow I just can't see Linux run in 64K of RAM, no matter how you optimize it. (And some of those 8080 and Z80 machines had less than a full 64k available, since they also had to shove a BIOS somewhere in that address space.)

      Now you could do bank switching and whatnot in hardware, to swap more than 64k in and out of the Z80's address space, and code kernel support for that. But that'd pretty much be designing a new machine, as opposed to reusing existing 8080 computers that used to run CP/M. Most of those had no such hardware.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    13. Re:Developing countries by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      The first steps to a Brazillian OS are being made by the OpenBeOS project (now officially renamed Haiku).

      Seriously, one of the most active contributors of the project is one Bruno G. Albuquerque, a resident of Brazil. There are several other important contributors from around the world working on Haiku as well.

      Of course, there are many of the same problems (U.S. compilers, U.S. hardware, etc.), but the base of initial developers is more multi-national, it seems.

      It's just one of those things that will take time. For a long time, the undisputed leaders in computer technology were the US. It's is only natural that Open Source/Free Software be centered around US things at first. The democratizing nature of FS/OSS will naturally push things to a more global nature, by helping level the playing field (every one has access to Linux, GNU, GCC, etc) and allowing developing countries to develop the software that they need at an affordable price.

    14. Re:Developing countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unofficially from CP|team, Slovenia...

      1. the videowall runs on 486, most of them dx2 66mhz, 8mb ram

      2. it also has a server that is dual P933, which also serves 15 free, public LTSP terminals for browsing the web, chatting etc. LTSP terminals are recycled P100

      3. it uses modified version of aalib and can play anything mplayer can play

      4. picture is here http://www.kiberpipa.org/modules.php?set_albumName =album108&id=P1010029&op=modload&name=gallery&file =index&include=view_photo.php

      5. decision to recycle, to combine lo-hi tech etc is not only practical, but also deeply policital

      6. slovenia is not a developing country (at least according to the world bank), but who cares.

      7. politically state of affairs in slovenia is grose. though open source is used to extort at least some discounts from microsoft. one part of the goverment is actually very OS aware and there are pilot projects running... the awareness varies a lot.

      8. Govrnment actually gives some money each year for the OS/free software projects in terms of prizes and grants. This year there was more than 80.000 EUR available, exclusively for OS projects.
      This helps a lot of OS projects, localizations etc.

      9. standard of living here is maybe not as high as in the states or the more developed parts of EU, but many people (forginers) agree that it is much less stresful. Some of them really like Ljubljana (the capital).

      10. Visit us in Cyberpipe if you are nearby! We are glad to host presentations about OS/free software projects, artists that deal with IT technology, VJ/DJ performances... we cannot offer honorarium, but can take care of accomodation.

      Mod this up, pelase! (hope it is in the right thread now)

    15. Re:Developing countries by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Again, there *were* Z80 computers that used bank-switching (Amstrad CPC/PCW, ZX Spectrum 128K and Commodore 128 among others), but that's not really an 8080 is it? ;-)

    16. Re:Developing countries by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      re-use of old 8080 PCs with Linux

      I'll believe it when I see it...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    17. Re:Developing countries by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      The Commodore didn't have a Z80 or 8080, did it? Buy ZX Spectrum would indeed qualify. You're right there. Forgot about that one.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    18. Re:Developing countries by maurizi0 · · Score: 1

      I realy have to say something on this conversation. We (at Cyberpipe/Kiberpipa) DIDN'T use 8080. The computers that are runing our VideoWall are old but not that old:) Nine of them are IBM PS/1 whith Pentium 66MHz and 3 of them are PackardBell Pentium 75MHz. Monitors are color and not black and white. Computers boot from floppy because they don't have Harddrives and are using ltsp tehnology. For displaing they use mplayer's alib to change the movie image in to ASCII symbols and to split the image on 12 monitors one of our guys whrited a simple script (i dont know how does it work). The image is not in color because the alib we are using does not support color ASCII symbols.

      And Slovenia is not a developing country. It has the best GDP of all the countries that joined EU on 1 may and bether than Portugal...

      It was fun to read the first post:))

      regards Maurizi0

    19. Re:Developing countries by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the 128 did, it could run CP/M stuff. It had that in addition to the familiar 6502-derived CPU (not sure if it was the 6510 from the C64, or something else).

    20. Re:Developing countries by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      But, where is the OS developed from the start in Brazil?

      Those metrics are immaterial at this point in time.

      They might be a matter of national pride, but most users and developers of open source software are more than happy to make use of the best that exists already and not reinvent the wheel needlessly.

      Brazil and other countries' success in open source need not be measured by old standards of how many operating systems and how many RISC chip they have created, how many computer languages do they create, etc..

      Rather, their real successes will be measured in terms of how many applications did they contribute to, how much did they contribute to Portuguese localization as well as general purpose bug fixes to applications developed in other countries? And, most importantly, how much widespread deployment of open source in their countries has reduced costs to external suppliers outside the country and potentially improved the average standard of living for its citizens?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  11. Well that's not right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What kind of f'ed up imperialism is this?

    They should be required to buy US software!

    I'm writing my representatives.

    1. Re:Well that's not right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Microsoft is just going to ship several million copies of Windows XP Pro to Iraq and then steal, uh I mean liberate, a couple of thousand barrels of oil to pay for it all?

    2. Re:Well that's not right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonono, they will do their "drug dealer" thing. Leak XP copies to Iraq, let the Iraqis get used to it (read: locked into using it) then charge them excessive amounts when the next forced upgrade cycle comes round (by which time, Iraq will be a thriving democracy).

  12. Bloat solution? by Stallmanite · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe poor countries developing Free software is just what we need to keep the GNU/L bloat under control.

    1. Re:Bloat solution? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      This might be a troll, but I'll bite.

      Don't like GNOME? Use windowmaker. If that's still too fat for you, use oroborus. Still too big? Try setting your window manager to "twm".

      Don't like OpenOffice? MS Office isn't much better...maybe you'd better stick to HTML and CSS with Bluefish. Or maybe vim or Emacs.

      FireFox still too slow? As long as you're dropping features by moving away, try w3m or lynx...two very capable text-based browsers.

      Don't have a 3D accelerator? Play software-rendered Quake. Or (using that same project) use the SDL's aalib target.

    2. Re:Bloat solution? by bigchris · · Score: 1

      Uh, GNOME isn't a window manager, it a desktop environment. I don't really think the comparison is valid, personally.

      For the text editor, I think AbiWord is pretty good.

    3. Re:Bloat solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't like OpenOffice? MS Office isn't much better...maybe you'd better stick to HTML and CSS with Bluefish. Or maybe vim or Emacs.

      Emacs as a solution to bloat? That's a new one...

    4. Re:Bloat solution? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I know GNOME installations predominantly use metacity. Windowmaker provides a lot of the same kind of docking functionality, with a wide variety applications available for it.

      So, in other words, windowmaker can still provide some of the functionality of GNOME, and thus can serve as a replacement.

    5. Re:Bloat solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /*The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries.*/

      Iraq is no developing country.

    6. Re:Bloat solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't like GNOME? Use windowmaker. If that's still too fat for you, use oroborus. Still too big? Try setting your window manager to "twm"."

      TWM! What a resource hog. Try WindowLab!

    7. Re:Bloat solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      Good one!

  13. Microsoft contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I would have thought that George W Bush's administration have already awarded the contract to Microsoft.

    1. Re:Microsoft contract by beattie · · Score: 1

      Microsoft or Halliburton? -- Just because they dont do software shouldnt stop them from winning the contract. :)

  14. I can see it now... by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, SPA "License Inspectors" are sent in. All they find is Free Software. Undaunted, Bill Gates sends in his own lawyers...

    Then it's a year later and the WMA's still haven't been found.

    1. Re:I can see it now... by Eeknay · · Score: 1

      But then they find an old WAV file buried in some guys 200MB hard drive.

    2. Re:I can see it now... by JosKarith · · Score: 1

      WMA's
      Windows of Mass Aggravation?

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    3. Re:I can see it now... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      But they found a huge cache of Ogg Vorbis. Just imagine the damage *that* could do if you used it as the payload of a SCO missile.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    4. Re:I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Undaunted, Bill Gates sends in his own lawyers...

      Hopefully then we will get to see them beheaded on TV

  15. Slow going for linux in Iraq by phreakv6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually its just the opposite that linux today [Wired news] reported few days back. Slow going for linux in Iraq

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  16. Re:Wait, what? by Nakkel · · Score: 0, Informative

    No, they have PlayStation2s running Linux.

  17. I guess Iraq's.. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    patent law isnt written by Microsoft like the proposed EU's.. yet.

    "/Dread"

  18. Re:Wait, what? by Eeknay · · Score: 1

    I actually heard reports that they were running Linux on Xbox, until they realized the Xbox would make a better weapon against the US invasion.

  19. Re:wma? by Pflipp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Weapons of Mass Applications?

    I lost you there.

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  20. Windows "backdoor" by carvalhao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is definitely THE major "backdoor" into Windows market share. While in most developed coutries Linux must open it's way into an already large Windows user base which has economical resources to buy the licences, in developing countries it has the opportunity to get a fresh start PLUS a user base that will hardly be able to pay Windows licences!

    As this applies not only to home users but also to governments in these conditions, this is a major victory. As these countries increasingly become the agricultural and industrial centers of our globalised economy, while the developed countries become information and knowledge producers, the need to interface may leed to:

    1 - The adoption of open middleware standards

    2 - The widespread use of Free Open Source software

    Either way, Open Source gets something out of it! :)

    1. Re:Windows "backdoor" by turgid · · Score: 1
      in developing countries it has the opportunity to get a fresh start PLUS a user base that will hardly be able to pay Windows licences!

      If only :-( In many countries, US-style copyright and software licensing laws to not apply. Many people use unauthorised copies of commercial software (i.e. Windows) anyway moral and legal issues aside.

      If Open Standards, and more importantly Free Software, prevails in places like Iraq, it will do so by virtue of being first: in the right place at the right time like everything else.

    2. Re:Windows "backdoor" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux has a major advantage in Iraq because we blew up most of their windows boxes so they're largely starting from scratch.
      Clearly, the best solution to getting linux on the desktop is to launch invasions and bombing campaigns around the world.
      Only then shall we be from from Gates and his software of massive-installation.

    3. Re:Windows "backdoor" by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the US is basically writing there laws anyway :) We're all set now.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    4. Re:Windows "backdoor" by turgid · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the US is basically writing there laws anyway :) We're all set now.

      ...and people will just ignore them like everywhere else.

      The thing with software is that most people prefer to use ripped-off commercial software rather than legitimate Free software because they perceive that the commercial software must somehow be "better" (after all, expensive things are usually better according to the prevailing mindset). Also, if the rest of the world is using Windows or whatever, that's what people will use. It's the herd mentality. It's human nature :-(

  21. Oh, sure by HisMother · · Score: 0

    > It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future.
    First they'd need to figure out the elusive step 2, you know, in the business plan.

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    1. Re:Oh, sure by johannesg · · Score: 1, Insightful
      How about,

      2. Stop trying to destroy everything the americans or their allies have touched, and instead start working constructively on rebuilding the country?

      That is what my country did after WW2, when the place was in ruins. As a result I have the privilege of living in one of the richest countries of the world.

    2. Re:Oh, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how about not sanctioning a country for 12 years and bombing it to obvlion. Then lie about WMD, invade kill atleast 50,000 civilians and countless army men defending their country? Then continously bomb civilians while "baby sitting" the country?

      Yeah, I'm sure the Iraqis will get all the priveleges the Red Indians got.

    3. Re:Oh, sure by johannesg · · Score: 1
      Well, anonymous sir, maybe they should think of it like this: what do they want to leave for their children? A war-torn desert where all freedom is crushed by religious zealots and / or local warlords, and the population lives in abject poverty? Or perhaps something better? It may just be necessary to swallow all that damn pride and, as I said before, do something constructive for a change.

      As the article suggests, some Iraqi's appear to be doing this already... Too bad really about that (supposedly) small group that thinks differently.

    4. Re:Oh, sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are you proposing? A massive pull out? Hand the keys to the country over to the Saddam Fedayeen? Oh wait, they really do not exist, because I have been brainwashed. Yeah. WHatever.

    5. Re:Oh, sure by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      Well, they can surely create a cottage industry out of selling body parts as trophies from all the beheadings and other mutilations, plus video of all that stuff--like something out of Videodrome.

    6. Re:Oh, sure by interpretthis.org · · Score: 1

      You are comparing two completely different situations. The second world war was nothing like the current war in Iraq. Comparing them makes no sense.

      And you are missing the point anyway when you say "This is what my country did after WW2". The whole point is that the war isn't over yet. The Americans have occupied most of the country but the resistance is still very strong. The Iraqis still have a lot of fighting to do before they regain control of their country. The June 30th hand over is a meaningless political stunt. An attempt for the American rulers to claim that they no longer have any control over the situation.

      And shut up about rebuilding your country anyway, it is not as if you had anything to do with it. I doubt that you are over 60 years of age.

  22. A link to the Iraqi Linux Group? by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know the url of the group reported in the article? I did not hear a domain name or any kind of name mentioned. Any more information about this group would be great if anyone knows a bit more about it.

    --
    Sleep is futile.
    1. Re:A link to the Iraqi Linux Group? by MajGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I couldn't RTFA so I don't know if it's the same group but the Iraqi Linux Users Group headquartered in Baghdad is here.

  23. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

    I don't know.... how dumb *can* you be?

    Much of the development effort behind Linux now comes from USA and code is stored on servers in USA. Last time I looked, USA was still in the world atlas and saying "it's purely global" (if that even means something in real terms - what do you mean by 'purely' there?) or even "it was started by a Finnish student" doesn't really make any difference if the people moving Linux into Iraq are moving it from USA. Whether or not it's the product of a US corporation, US restrictions may apply when you are taking something from the US to Iraq. It has been in the news recently although I couldn't find the link earlier.

    I suspect you are not dumb, just bored and trolling?

  24. US Law (from Silicon Valley LUG Open Letter) by LondonLawyer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Linux is the Free/Open Source UNIX-like operating system kernel that runs on many modern computer systems. Linux is available under the GNU General Public License, which means that users may freely copy, change, and distribute it, but must make source code available to recipients and may not impose any restrictions on further distribution. Linux does contain some security features that use encryption. As such, it is classified under ECCN 5D002. Because Linux is open source, it is eligible for export under License Exception TSU in accordance with 15 CFR 740.13(e).

    On May 7, the President exercised his authority under the Wartime Supplemental Authorization Act of 2003 to suspend most of the provisions of the Iraq Sanctions Act of 1990. On June 27, 2003, the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published an interim final rule (68 Fed. Reg. 38188) amending the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 575, to include a general license authorizing certain new transactions. The export of items controlled by the Department of Commerce was addressed in 31 CFR 575.533(b)(2):

    The exportation from the United States or, if subject to U.S. jurisdiction, the exportation or rexportation from a third country to Iraq of any goods or technology (including technical data or other information) controlled by the Department of Commerce under the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR chapter VII, subchapter C) for exportation to Iraq must be separately authorized by or pursuant to this part.

    The term "controlled by the Department of Commerce" means subject to a license requirement under the Department of Commerce's Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Items subject to a license requirement under the EAR include items on the Commerce Control List that are listed in 15 CFR 746.3 as requiring a license for exportation or reexportation to Iraq.

    Under Section 746.3 of the EAR, an export license is required to export or reexport to Iraq any item on the CCL containing a NS Column 1 in the Country Chart Column of the License Requirements section of an ECCN. Software classified under ECCN 5D002 is controlled for NS Column 1.

    It is important to note that proprietary operating system software such as Microsoft Windows and Sun Solaris have been classified as mass-market encryption products and are eligible for export under ECCN 5D992. These products may be exported to Iraq without a license under the interim final rule (68 Fed. Reg. 38188) amending the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations.

    Under the provisions of License Exception TSU, open source and the corresponding object code may be exported to all destinations except Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan and Syria. Thus, open source and the corresponding object code are treated as if subject only to AT (anti-terrorism) controls. Items subject to AT controls may be exported to Iraq under the interim final rule (68 Fed. Reg. 38188) amending the Iraqi Sanctions Regulations.

    Source: http://linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7318

    1. Re:US Law (from Silicon Valley LUG Open Letter) by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      So its ok to ship windows and solaris... but just a minute when did The good ole US of A get control of linux? Erm it hasn't

      maybe an american giving iraqi's linux distributions might get an american in trouble. but I don't think that would apply to the rest of the world would it.

      Is it just me but does the USA have a tendency to say F*ck you we own the planet.

      If something is given away freely to all, such as linux, then that is the way it is. If you want me to obey American laws and American directives then give me american citizenship.

    2. Re:US Law (from Silicon Valley LUG Open Letter) by danharan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US/UK tag-team also vetoed many other goods. Iraq for example was refused pencils (the graphite can be used to make bombs), paper, ink, chlorine (essential for water purification, but can also be used to make weapons), lightbulbs... the list goes on.

      According to the UN, sanctions have killed over a million people in the time they were in place. People like Denis Halliday even quit and called the sanctions genocidal, squarely pointing the finger at the US and the UK.

      So I'm not the least bit surprised that they would consider Linux dangerous. Anything that could be considered "dual-use" could be banned- even if they are essentials like chlorine.

      What is perhaps more surprising is that a government would keep passing such stupid laws. They won't stop me, e.g., from bringing a Linux distro and encryption packages with me if I go to Cuba. Btw, I live in Canada, so won't face repercussions from the US; I wouldn't recommend this type of behaviour for US citizens as they can decide to give you a hard time.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  25. hardly surprising by manavendra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Contrary to the more obvious knee-jerk reaction and wisecracks this post might invoke, I can can understand how the populace of Iraq feels having been subject to years of anarchy, tyranny and then several years of painful, forced and widely questioned war

    We have all seen dozens of documentaries and newsreports of what the people have Iraq have had to face, especially since this new war

    Yet, in a way, things can only become better. Perhaps the fanatics/militants will target something else (or at least outside Iraq) once the formal hand-over/creation of a sovereign Iraq is completed (think its only 9 days to go now).

    The people of Iraq realize the only way forward is to make the most use of whatever resources available, be it hardware or software. Most services and businesses need technology, and though hardware costs cannot be eliminated entirely, open source software solutions go a long way in reducing costs.

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:hardly surprising by aixou · · Score: 1

      Assuming everything does go well in Iraq (the future is still muddy as of now), I wonder how your typical Slashdotter will respond (say 5/10 years in the future). Will there be doublespeak "I was for it all along", will Bush get any credit?

      I'm genuinely curious. (This isn't really anything anyone can answer now. You can attempt to, but I'll make my own observations when/if the time comes)

      If things go south (even further then they are now), I think I can anticipate the responses, so I don't need any insight there. :)

    2. Re:hardly surprising by cranos · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know you're not looking for a response, but if Iraq is a better place five to ten years from now thenit will be in spite of the americans not because.

      Your average /.er will simply move on to another cause, however there will still be those of us who will look back and think Bush was an idiot.

    3. Re:hardly surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the fanatics/militants will target something else (or at least outside Iraq) once the formal hand-over/creation of a sovereign Iraq is completed (think its only 9 days to go now).

      Perhaps..but probably not. Just look at Suadi Arabia; hardly the model of a peaceful scociety free from religious extremism and terrorism now is it? Afghanistan (Remember them?) continue to struggle with terrists and insurgants. Why would Iraq be any better?

      If anything Iraq is going to be worse. The Shiate majority will form a government at the earliest oppurtunity, which will piss off the Kurds and the Suni's. At the best you can expect cival unrest, at worst downright cival war. I wouldn't be surprised to see Turkey become involved in an effort to put the squeeze on the Kurds again. It'll be a blood bath..but no body will care by then of course.

    4. Re:hardly surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that they'll still look back and think that Bush is an idiot. But I don't think that, if they are better (hell--they already are!), it will be in spite of America. If we did not have the initiative to overthrow Saddam and then pump billions and billions of taxpayer money into the country, along with the priceless cost of hundreds of our soldiers' lives, where would Iraq be right now?

      How can you say that we will have had nothing to do with their being better off?

    5. Re:hardly surprising by nevets · · Score: 1

      How can you say that we will have had nothing to do with their being better off?

      Are they?

      I don't know, and I wouldn't say they are just because we got rid of an evil dictator. There could be worst problems. I don't know. But can anyone list any polls of the Iraqi people whether they think they are better off now than before the war. Of course finding a balanced poll is down right hard if not impossible. Ask mostly those that were directly oppressed by Sadam and you'll get a big yes, ask those that had they children killed during the war, you would probably get a no. But a general random poll of all types... what would that show?

      --
      Steven Rostedt
      -- Nevermind
    6. Re:hardly surprising by aled · · Score: 1

      Sorry I can't found any, just the ones that say:
      "A poll taken by the coalition provisional authority in mid-May shows that 92 percent of Iraqis now view Americans as occupiers and only 2 percent see them as liberators...Fifty-five percent of Iraqis say they would feel safer if the U.S. troops left."
      article

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
  26. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What he means is that once any code has left the US US restrictions no longer apply to that code at that non US location. It need only "escape" once, through some means or other, and then it is "free."

    Why would the Iraqis download Linux from the US when they can download the French Mandrake from Paris, Prague, or Dresden?

    KFG

  27. Slovenia as a developing country?!! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I'd be really interested to hear from Slovenian posters about the economic state of their country, being described as "developing". Last time I was there (1999) it seemed a lot more developed than large parts of the USA (statement not flamebait). Can more informed posters contribute? noting that it was part of the former Soviet Union doesn't wash as a response, so was Estonia and I believe Estonia is now one of the most wired up countries in the world...

    1. Re:Slovenia as a developing country?!! by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      Slovenia was never part of the Soviet Union, it was part of Yugoslavia.

      Only been there a couple times 15 years ago, so I can't tell you what the current state of affairs is there.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    2. Re:Slovenia as a developing country?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Developed" and "developing" usually refer to the high-end of the economy. Slovenia is a very nice country, and they make some high-quality ski equipment, but they don't have a Nokia or a Philips or a Wal-Mart to show for it.

      To put it another way, how influential is Slovenian industry?

    3. Re:Slovenia as a developing country?!! by kd4evr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Current state of affairs in Slovenia:

      - officially joined EU May this year
      - may adopt currency (Euro) in next couple of years
      - inflation some 4% and dropping
      - cost of living close to EU, paychecks lower, though

      - parrent is correct, no globaly-strong economic players there
      - only suitable for investors and VC with thich skin and stamina
      - too expensive and inflexible public administration (could be true in a lot of places, though)
      - taxes the life and blood out of decent citizens and straight businesses
      - little to no perspective for young people & families

      Developing country is a wrong label for Slovenia. The correct indication is that Slovenia is a country that could be well off and has every chance of being a member of the 'developed' club; however, with a self-centered attidute, minorty complex of a small nation and a prevailing sense of envy and narrow-minded greed in most of the population, the nation is draining its resources the wrong way.
      As a non-fitting member of this Slovenian society, constantly contemplating a well known sport of the nation: emigration (or e-migration, for that matter) I still have to develop a term like 'Retarding' country for the state of affairs...

      Damn retards even renewed the M$ licenses without a wink of an eye - for big bucks; at the same time the news was out that M$ flexes to zero to stay in business against the cheaper and the better.

    4. Re:Slovenia as a developing country?!! by zerblat · · Score: 1
      Um, Slovenia is also a very small country (with a population of ~2 million), so it's not terribly surprising that there isn't a Slovenian Nokia or such. Finland has a population of about 5 million and the land area is a lot bigger than Slovenia. In 2002 the GDP per capita was $18,000, which is the same as in Taiwan and Portugal.

      It should also be noted that Slovenia was always the wealthies part of Yugoslavia.

      --
      Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.
    5. Re:Slovenia as a developing country?!! by kd4evr · · Score: 1

      Now which S.O.B. modded this down in matter of minutes? And why?
      So is this how it works: working time in Redmond, people paid to mod down anybody sharing the truth about M$?

      well, since somebod's asking for it, let's burn some more karma by sheding some more light on the state of things.

      Open source community in Slovenia is a strong movement, but compared to what they're up against, they hardly have a fair chance:

      Earlier Slashdot story
      "MS Rails On Open Source, Appeals To Gov't Greed"

      my comment:
      Open source has no bribe money to give (Score:1)
      by kd4evr (712384) on Wednesday May 26, @09:44AM (#9256757)
      attention moderators: Karma2burn

      Reading between the lines, M$ is telling governements (and intereseted governement officials in particular) that it is very unlikely that a big open-source deal in a public service would be accompanied by any sort of bonuses, benefits and commi$$ions for the
      decision-makers.

      1. ignore open source
      2. ??????
      3. Profit?!

      The shortened example below is purely coincidental and totally misses the point:

      Slovenia recently decided on a huge license deal with M$, not even considering open source solutions as well as ignoring the news that M$ is willing to give licenses for free to countries just not to switch to non-M$. Another job well done and taxpayers money well spent, would be in tune with the above article.

      The interesting detail below is purely coincidental and has no point whatsoever:

      Former CEO of M$ Slovenia, now doing intl. business is now married to a former governement-head-of-PR, now vice-chairing the Slovenian chamber of commerce. The happy couple made the tabloid news couple of years ago - he giving her an Audi TT as a gift - or some sort of an engagement present...

      Now mod this!

  28. This is entirely logical by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, they already have the beards, and I'm sure sandals are pretty popular in the Arabian desert ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:This is entirely logical by turgid · · Score: 1
      After all, they already have the beards, and I'm sure sandals are pretty popular in the Arabian desert ;-)

      Dad, is that you? Get back to your Delphi coding...

  29. Weapons of mass defenestration! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0

    Quick, call the marines!

  30. Re:Wait, what? by aixou · · Score: 1

    I actually heard reports that they were running Linux on Xbox, until they realized the Xbox would make a better weapon against the US invasion.


    By throwing the Xboxes at US soldiers? I don't think anyone could survive that....

  31. Electric kinda needed though... by weave · · Score: 1

    Now if the electricity would stay on for more than two hours at a time, they'll be set.

    1. Re:Electric kinda needed though... by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

      good point... Iraq has enough problems as it is, and people are concentrating on open source software? how about creating suitable / sustainable living conditions first?

    2. Re:Electric kinda needed though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You're joking. Fox News says that things are great for the Iraqi people and they'll be building statues to Bush 20 years from now. I hear they want to put Bush's face on the million dinar bill, but Bremmer thinks Bush will be upset because that's not enough to buy you a cup of coffee over there.

    3. Re:Electric kinda needed though... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention US bullets flying through their windows...

  32. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Much of the development effort behind Linux now comes from USA and code is stored on servers in USA.

    • KDE : Trolltech (Norway)
    • Gnome : Miguel De Icaza (Mexico)
    • mPlayer : Hungary
    • Mandrake : France
    • SuSe : Germany

    etc.
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  33. Re:How fucking dumb can you be? by mpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Much of the development effort behind Linux now comes from USA

    Only in the sense that Linus now lives there.

    and code is stored on servers in USA.

    Actually it is all over the planet. Quite a bit of OSS is deliberatly developed outside of the US because of the political minefield of "export restrictions" which exist.

  34. Licenses are'nt the issue by MajGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thing is, we're all assuming the average Iraqi, or even the average Iraqi government minister, *cares* about licensing issues. They don't. This is a country where you can buy pirated CDs with anything you want for next to nothing. If they decide to go with Microsoft products, they'll buy them for a fistful of dinars, install them, and use them for the next three generations with nary a thought of a visit from Redmond copyright police. If Iraq becomes the next bastion of software freedom and advances the cause of FOSS throughout the world, it will be because FOSS DOES THE JOB. Not because of pure idealism, or any longing to breathe free air after decades of tyranny. It's a good opportunity for FOSS advocates to break into an emerging market, but the focus needs to be on the capabilites, ease of use, great support, and security of future development -- not licensing platitudes.

    1. Re:Licenses are'nt the issue by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 1

      You're right - Iraqis (currently) don't care about licenses. But what about copy-protection mechanisms? Didn't Microsoft say that XPSP2 will not install on pirated machines? Linux doesn't come with this sort of restriction.

  35. Uh Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries. It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future."


    Yes, yes, of course it will. Jesus Christ. Does anyone here actually, truly and genuinely believe that a handful of Linux users in Iraq are going to make the nation more competitive when their main natural resource (oil) is being plundered so freely by The West?

    Linux is not the answer to all of the world's problems. Oh, hold on, here's an idea. Stop 'coding' yet another MP3 ripper for KDE, get out a pen and some paper and start writing to your congressmen about the Allies' invasion and occupation of Iraq.

    Free software may help Iraq in the future, but it won't do Jack Shit until they get the rest of their immediate problems sorted first.

    1. Re:Uh Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, you're right. Let's stop coding marginally productive software, and instead write our representatives telling them that the Iraqi people are angry because: a) we overthrew their murderous dictator, and b) we are handing over full sovereignty (including their right to request our forces' departure) in 8 days.

      Better yet, let's write to our congressmen and tell them that while Saddam is still in our custody, we should put him back in power so he can behead everyone in Iraq that has said something negative about him in the past year in a blog.

      Idiot.

    2. Re:Uh Huh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, said it before I could.

  36. Leapfrogging by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The idea is to make low-cost, home-grown software and is said to hold great promise for developing countries. It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future.

    This has happened before; when the former eastern bloc countries wanted to get on the Internet when the iron curtain came down, despite being not especially wealthy, they bought current equipment. As a result, for many years, sites in countries such as Slovenia and Poland were faster than sites in France and Germany that were making do with equipment they'd bought many years earlier.

    --

  37. Tricky questions which may matter... by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1


    Does US-developed code really become 'free' after 'escaping' USA?

    Is there liability for letting the code 'escape' the country and if so on whom would the liability fall?

    If you are a US Linux server provider, can you be held liable if you provide the means of 'escape' of the code to a mirror site?

    What if you are "actively conspiring" to circumvent the restrictions by doing this?

    What is the current legal structure operating within Iraq (which is essentially under US occupation)?

    Could it effect imports into Iraq regardless of exporting country?

    I used import in the title but export on the thought that lay behind it - this was not a typo. I don't know the answers to the above questions but if you are in the USA and involved in coding or distributing Linux out of the country you should probably give them some thought. If you are outside the USA, you should still probably give them some thought.

    1. Re:Tricky questions which may matter... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Well, look, unless the US is willing to actually invade France for. . . .oh. Ummmmmmmmmmmm, nevermind. My bad.

      KFG

    2. Re:Tricky questions which may matter... by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

      dude, to be quite honest, one of the many reasons many of us use linux is because we quite simply don't give a FUCK what you are saying here

      Sure, I recognise that attitude. Try it from the dock if you like. It won't get you far.

      Like it or not, USA is a country of trials and lawyers. It looks to me like Linux is starting to get sucked into an era of court orders and shady dealing - that's what happens when money is at stake. If you want proof, look to SCO.

      MS will use the law to shut Linux out of new markets if it can.

    3. Re:Tricky questions which may matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it or not, USA is a country of trials and lawyers.

      so what? i'm not from the USA. i am not bound their laws. as others have already pointed out, linux is not US owned.

      It looks to me like Linux is starting to get sucked into an era of court orders and shady dealing - that's what happens when money is at stake. If you want proof, look to SCO.

      we're all looking at SCO - looking at it getting NOWHERE. and even if it does get somewhere, that's one company that is trying to save itself from bankruptcy by arguing over a few lines of code it alleges is stolen. it's nothing to do with "linux" as a whole.

      SCO might sue redhat linux. SCO might sue every US linux.

      but like i said, linux is not owned by the US, and the US can do whatever they want. i'll be running linux.

    4. Re:Tricky questions which may matter... by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

      i'm not from the USA. i am not bound their laws. as others have already pointed out, linux is not US owned.
      ...
      we're all looking at SCO - looking at it getting NOWHERE. and even if it does get somewhere, that's one company that is trying to save itself from bankruptcy by arguing over a few lines of code it alleges is stolen. it's nothing to do with "linux" as a whole.
      ...
      US can do whatever they want. i'll be running linux.

      Brave words!

      A few questions:

      - Do you think a foreign hacker isn't targeted by US law enforcement if he is operating outside the USA?
      - Who do you think is drafting Iraqi copyright law at the moment?
      - Do you think that SCO will have caused Linux no problems whatsoever if they lose? What about FUD?
      - Do you think MS have the will and resources to lobby effectively and to enter into pointless litigation to add to the FUD?
      - Do you honestly believe what happens in the USA doesn't effect you and that US antiterrorism restrictions cannot apply if you are not American?
      - Are you prepared to appear in court on suspected terrorist charges just because you were running Linux?

      Unfortunately problems are rarely solved when they are simply ignored.

  38. Xfce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try xfce. A lightweight desktop environment.

  39. Sustainable? by DescData · · Score: 1

    As usual, the article does not address the issue of sustainability of Open Source projects. If the market in Iraq is small, and there is little money for anything, all the more reason for promoting respect for IP. The way to stay alive may not be fat contracts but decent residuals.

    1. Re:Sustainable? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      And how is open source inconsistent with "respect for IP"?

    2. Re:Sustainable? by DescData · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it is. I'm saying that more focus needs to be put on feeding the developers. For a developers in adeveloping country I sure that is more on an issue.

  40. And none if this would have happened... by rotor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...if it weren't for one of the people most vilified by slashdotters. It seems a little ironic that people who are so against what the Bush administration has done in Iraq are so excited about the freedoms that the Iraqi people are starting to see as a result of those actions. Yeah - Bush has problems, but the course in Iraq was the right one to take.

    --
    Addlepated - punk & metal
    1. Re:And none if this would have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There's an excellent article by Christopher Hitchens over on Slate: Unfairenheit 9/11 which really shows the background behind President Bush's decisions with respect to Iraq, and the tough job he's been up against. The article is a must read. It is unfortunate that so much of the mainstream media has distorted the truth. President Bush is certainly not the villain that some portray him to be.

    2. Re:And none if this would have happened... by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 0

      Freedom in Iraq is indeed nice. It'd be nicer if freedom weren't simultaneously under assault here. Hell, the Supreme Court just effectively repealed the fourth amendment, for crying out loud!

    3. Re:And none if this would have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afterwards, read The Essential Dishonesty of Christopher Hitchens for a little balance.

    4. Re:And none if this would have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How many of those justices did George W. Bush appoint?

    5. Re:And none if this would have happened... by Darby · · Score: 1

      Yeah - Bush has problems, but the course in Iraq was the right one to take.

      Really.
      Why Iraq? Why not....say Afghanistan. We blew the shit out of them and then left them to rot. This even though they actually *did* harbor terrorists who attacked us. In fact, as far as we know the guy who really did attack us is still there but we gave up on it.

      So explain to us, if you will, what makes the course in Iraq the "right" one, but that same course was wrong in Afghanistan.

      Unless you can explain that, save the moral high horse. It's completely ridiculous given that we made up a bunch of lies as an excuse to go help those poor dear Iraqis while the legitimate target was left under dictatorial control.

      Oh yeah, and how's that heroin crop doing?

    6. Re:And none if this would have happened... by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Right one to take? Ask the tens of thousands of families in Iraq who've lost loved ones over the last year, and are still being shot at by overzealous guys in uniform. Now, those guys have better boots and bigger guns. They're also worse at restoring power and water, and can't tell the difference between a normal iraqi and a militiaman. Right course to take my ass. If you really believe that, I pity you. Turn off Fox.

    7. Re:And none if this would have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So whats next... Saudi Arabia? They *actually* have ties to terrorism, hell, Osama was a fucking Saudi *Prince*, and all of the September 11th hijackers were Saudi. So... should we invade them? No... they're friends! They give us oil...! Saying that "Iraq is free now!" is a moot point. The decision to choose a leader, no matter how corrupt, rests with the citizens of the country, not the United States. Why dont we invade China? Tienneman Square is proof enough that their people need to be liberated! Remember how we liberated the USSR by invading them? Oh yeah... the people chose that, not a shot was fired, because it was done by self determination, not invasion. Imagine what would happen if we had invaded the USSR... I bet there would be a lot more resentment towards the US if we had.

    8. Re:And none if this would have happened... by rotor · · Score: 1

      We left Afghanistan? When? Can you tell that to my friend who's there right now? I think he'd like to come home (or get into Iraq) if we've truely ceased operations there.

      And we didn't leave Afghanistan under a dictator. We got rid of the Taliban and then (with the U.N.) helped them hold elections.

      However, if you want to know the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan, look at years of U.N. resolutions that Saddam's government summarilly dismissed. The consequence of regime change was outlined in the resolutions. The U.N. showed a weak side and backed down, but someone had to be willing to stand up for this. If the world continued to show that there are no consequences for actions, terrorists and corrupt governments would continue to become more emboldened.

      How many times can you tell someone "no" and then let them continue before they move on to something bigger?

      --
      Addlepated - punk & metal
    9. Re:And none if this would have happened... by rotor · · Score: 1

      Osama was outcast by his family.

      The Saudi government has assisted in tracking down terrorists in their country.

      I'm not arguing on China. There are horrible violations over there.

      The USSR happened to gain a leader in Gorbachev who saw that his country was failing and was open to change as a way to help the issues.

      If Saddam had stopped his human rights violations and complied with U.N. resolutions (which as I stated in another reply clearly stated consequences), there would have been no reason to invade.

      --
      Addlepated - punk & metal
    10. Re:And none if this would have happened... by cqnn · · Score: 1

      Osama still had contacts in-country and access to millions in funding to divert to Al-Queda, even
      if his family had severed ties.

      The Saudis are still considered one of the more
      politically oppressive regimes in the region.

      And he didn't even mention North Korea

      The USSR still had to go thru many years of political unrest to get to the point where we
      considered them as allies, and that's with
      the moniker of "the evil empire" from the Regean

      If human rights violations and non-compliance with
      the UN were the only sole justifications for invasion, then there are a couple dozen other
      countries we should be looking to send forces to;
      including the U.S. itself.

    11. Re:And none if this would have happened... by Darby · · Score: 1

      We left Afghanistan? When? Can you tell that to my friend who's there right now? I think he'd like to come home (or get into Iraq) if we've truely ceased operations there.

      The country is controlled by brutal warlords.
      There is no free democratic society. If our actions in Iraq were motivated in the least by a desire to help free the people as the chimp keeps lying about, then we certainly would have done so there first. We have a hell of a lot more troops in Iraq than in Afghanistan even though Iraq was never any sort of threat to us.
      I thought that would have been clear.

      And we didn't leave Afghanistan under a dictator. We got rid of the Taliban and then (with the U.N.) helped them hold elections.


      No, we left them under several competing dictators.

      look at years of U.N. resolutions that Saddam's government summarilly dismissed.

      Apparently, he did not dismiss them. Otherwise, there would have been some WMDs in Iraq for us to find. But there aren't
      Besides, that is beside the point. The question was what is the difference that caused the Iraqi people to be so deserving of "freedom and liberty", yet the Afghani people have been left to the tender mercies of the brutal warlords who reinitiated the heroin trade as every person with a clue predicted before we even invaded.

      Shrub duped idiotic people into believing Iraq was in some way involved with 9/11 which he, of course, wasn't. This was to justify an invasion which has had the intended affect of transferring the wealth of Americans to his friend's companies.

      Remain in denial over that blatantly obvious fact at everybody's peril.

    12. Re:And none if this would have happened... by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      None, and I sincerely hope that either he isn't reelected or that the remaining sane justices hold out until the end of his second term so that he doesn't get a change to stack the court with any more republican-appointed enemies of freedom like Scalia and Thomas.

  41. Get some perspective... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    If your country was over-run by invaders who have just bombed the fuck out of *everything*, are you going to spend *all* your time building and fixing and digging trenches and laying pipe and all the rest of it? Or are you going to kick back and spend the evening drinking beer and geeking to chill out a bit?

  42. New excuse for invasion... by morie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Linux of mass distribution...

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  43. Take out evil by hatrisc · · Score: 1

    we're not open sourcing iraq, we're "freeing" it from evil.

    --
    I write code.
  44. it's going to take time. by nabil_IQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was a bit realistic when I said it's going to take between 2 and 5 years t have a solid base to build on. Tons of challenges down there now, security is the bigest issue.

    Iraq does have a large technology work force, they lack direction and lack resources. Just so you know, Iraq governement and educational institues been running Unix since the 1970s on mainly ICL mainframes (International Computers Ltd., too bad they are gone now). I personally knew few Unix gurus in Iraq and it's just a matter of time to contact them and show them Linux.

    Linux isn't the solution for everything, but I beleive Linux can do a great job in the servers and office desktop environments, home users will still want to play their favorite game or watch some DMCA compliant movies :P. basically Linux can save Iraq (as a governement and/or businesses operate there) large sums of money by implementing it in government and businesses establishments and in educational institues for both server and desktop environments.

    again, it's going to take time. So let's stay hopefull.

    --

    Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
    1. Re:it's going to take time. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      ICL was bought out by Fujitsu years ago, fyi. Loads of their machines are still in use today.

    2. Re:it's going to take time. by nabil_IQ · · Score: 1

      yes, they are in use, but the buzz about ICL is gone, it was the hot thing in late 1970s and into the 1980s

      --

      Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
  45. open source in irak is not the same because.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The remote exploited bugs.
    The source code beheadings.
    One day you have a kernel running things around and the next day a new kernel is installed bringing lot of compatibility and continuity issues.
    You keep sending troops of coders and the project deadline just gets delayed.
    For every patch applied there is a new breach.
    I18n is something far away from reality.
    Documentation is confuse, what is true for a group is a lie for others.
    Project leaders are only to be found in spider holes.
    If you don't carry a gun nobody takes you seriously.
    If you think Gnome and KDE are the only ones on war you don't know your Iraq.
    The shells just keep blowing up.
    The delivery of updates is not possible due the terrible conditions the infrastructure is.

    Peace.

  46. The Bush Assassination Attempt Never Happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sy Hersh did an excellent job debunking that hoax at the time.

    1. Re:The Bush Assassination Attempt Never Happened by Rei · · Score: 1

      Thanks for saving me the effort of having to track this article down. It's amazing how many liberals even aren't familiar with this.

      To all of the readers out there: If you believe that a group of people behaving like Iraqi boogleg smugglers whose confession was extracted through torture by a totalitarian regime who has interests in enforcing a rift between the US and Iraq (Kuwait) is solid, I've got some swampland to sell you...

      --
      I just invaded Grammar Czechoslovakia and duped Grammar Neville Chamberlain; now it's on to Grammar Poland.
    2. Re:The Bush Assassination Attempt Never Happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks for saving me the effort of having to track this article down. It's amazing how many liberals even aren't familiar with this.
      Luckily, I am not a liberal. I am a radical, so I stay on top of these things. :-)
  47. Social and psychological aspects.... by LondonLawyer · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the Chinese software pirates and the growing adoption of Linux in China are symptoms of the same underlying factor. Could it be that Linux appeals because of its Marxist flavour and that piracy is rife because there is a psychological leaning away from privately owned/controlled intellectual property? Afterall, if property is theft then you're simply stealing back from thieves when you pirate their code.

    What input to Linux has there been from the former Soviet East Europe?

    Seems to me that OSS requires a few basics to flourish (although it can probably do without the full list if there's a particularly high weighting elsewhere):

    - Availability of a communications/organisational network (i.e. the Internet)
    - Affordability of basic computer hardware
    - A recognised need for open, reliable, cheap software
    - Availability of open code to use as the basis for development
    - Skilled coders with time on their hands or who are able to make the time they need
    - A culture which leads to a willingness to share the results of work

    If you don't have all of these, I think development is liable to get stunted.

  48. rebuilding the country is the first priority by jack_canada · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why develope linux in iraq if nobody can afford a pc??

  49. Very Astute by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Open source is never more relevant to Iraq. The whole idea was to open source the oil.

    You get some of it with

    ftp oilfield.com

    Maybe not. It's been slashdotted.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  50. This gives a whole new meaning to.. by StarfishOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Enduring Freedom" :D

  51. Great. More programmers working for $2 a day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >It could leapfrog Iraq into a more competitive future

    Great. More programmers working for $2 a day.

  52. Slovenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unofficially from CP|team, Slovenia...

    1. the videowall runs on 486, most of them dx2 66mhz, 8mb ram

    2. it also has a server that is dual P933, which also serves 15 free, public LTSP terminals for browsing the web, chatting etc. LTSP terminals are recycled P100

    3. it uses modified version of aalib and can play anything mplayer can play

    4. picture is here http://www.kiberpipa.org/modules.php?set_albumName =album108&id=P1010029&op=modload&name=gallery&file =index&include=view_photo.php

    5. decision to recycle, to combine lo-hi tech etc is not only practical, but also deeply policital

    6. slovenia is not a developing country (at least according to the world bank), but who cares.

    7. politically state of affairs in slovenia is grose. though open source is used to extort at least some discounts from microsoft. one part of the goverment is actually very OS aware and there are pilot projects running... the awareness varies a lot.

    8. Govrnment actually gives some money each year for the OS/free software projects in terms of prizes and grants. This year there was more than 80.000 EUR available, exclusively for OS projects.
    This helps a lot of OS projects, localizations etc.

    9. standard of living here is maybe not as high as in the states or the more developed parts of EU, but many people (forginers) agree that it is much less stresful. Some of them really like Ljubljana (the capital).

    10. Visit us in Cyberpipe if you are nearby! We are glad to host presentations about OS/free software projects, artists that deal with IT technology, VJ/DJ performances... we cannot offer honorarium, but can take care of accomodation.

    Mod this up, pelase!

  53. While it's the right thing to do .. by pherris · · Score: 1
    ... right now Iraq is 0wn3d. Yes, the "handover" will happen soon but please don't kid yourselves into thinking Iraqis will have any say in who gets their money from oil sales for many, many years. They will live under a "forced monopoly" imposed by the US where the US will say what software will be used in all government offices. I personally wouldn't be surprised if they figured out a way to at least temporarily outlaw the use of OS/GPL software in the government to give US software companies a chance to get a foothold. Once their data is locked into a proprietary format it will take much more work (and cost) to move to OSS. One of the big reasons Munich moved to OSS was so they wouldn't be locked into one vendor's product.

    If you doubt this and think that Iraq's new constitution and laws won't favor the US remember that it's Hillary Rosen, former head of the RIAA, that's writing their Copyright Laws.

    The move to OSS for Iraq is IMO the right and good thing for them and the OSS community, the move to an open data format for their information is just as important.

    While Bush calls Iraqis "equal partners" he treats them like "sand ni--ers". I apologize for using that phrase but it's truly apropos. Like I said, they're 0wn3d. The widespread use of OSS in their goverment is, IMO, a DOA issue.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:While it's the right thing to do .. by r4d1x · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, the US government is using Linux and unix in some sectors. The military uses a Linux server (RedHat 9 AS) to run item tracking/recieving/distribution point. They also use Unix for the same purposes just in different sector. A little group called NMCI (Navy Marine Corps Infrastructure (?)) has been trying to block the use of open source because the believe that Linux and Unix are very insecure compared to a fully patched NT4 ISS. Someone lied to them...... But none the less, Linux and Unix both have places in the government with the military. Even though Microsoft has a monopoly on the market for idiot users, there will always be a few of us that choose the alternative, and some of them are here in the government.

    2. Re:While it's the right thing to do .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pherris, what you are saying is very one sided. There's a lot more to the picture in Iraq than meets the eye, or that the general press is reporting. So much reporting today is one sided.

      May I recommend a place that does news analysis much more more fairly? Check this out- very fair, three-sided 2004 Election Analysis!

      You might be surprised to read that there are at least three sides to every issue, and even more when it comes to the war on terror and the war in Iraq!

  54. 'Insightful' my ass by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    I was just wondering how far down the page I'd have to scroll to see another "hold everything and feed the children first" merchant. Looks like the concept of a country full of people being able to tackle two problems at once still hasn't sunk in on /.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  55. 9 days away? by incom · · Score: 1

    So they are having elections in Iraq in 9 days? It's not a free country until they have elected leaders.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  56. Now this is proof enough, don't you think?-NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In short. Greed and Evil are killing Iraq from within. We may chastize the Americans, but sometimes the worst enemy one has is ourselves.

  57. Electric kinda needed though...Selfwounding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now if the electricity would stay on for more than two hours at a time, they'll be set."

    Stop blowing up your infrastructure, after it's been fixed.

  58. New Linux Distribution by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Jihadux: The only linux distribution optimized for jihad. You can recompile your kernel, browse the web for beheading videos with Konqueror, and type letters in OpenOffice, which delivers the office productivity tools you need to destroy all Zionists and Crusaders.

  59. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Junis and his Commodore 64 moved there a couple of years ago.

  60. Too late. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Bill can't have Iraq, because according to the title of the article, Iraq has been open sourced.

    Now that Iraq is GPLed, maybe we can figure out why it has been acting so buggy. I'm not a programmer, but I suspect that it has something to do with its relgious algorithms.

    1. Re:Too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing wrong with the trusted sections.
      There is conflict between the kernel control functions. Restrictive schedulers are abusing exclusive locks in an attempt to bypass distributed functions. The equivalent of a DDOS will take care of that -- any limiting function will soon find itself assailed by cleanup routines in every surrounding task. The problems are outnumbered by the good code.

  61. Linux and Open Source by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The story was about the growth of Linux in Iraq. But what about non-Linux operating systems? Are Net/FreeBSD banned because of their mascot, but OpenBSD not because its mascot is Puffy? Enquiring minds want to know!

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  62. you're the idiot by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    if you've been paying any attention at all to anything that has happened in Iraq since their so-called liberation you'd know that most Iraqis want us out and that the longer we stay the stronger more radical forces like al-Sadr get. Even the Washington Post is reporting that the handover is a joke. Most Iraqis recognize the CPA as a puppet of the occupation rather than as an indigenous government. It is spectacularly stupid to put into power a long time exile with open CIA contacts and expect the Iraqis to welcome him as their new leader. The security situation is a nightmare. Like everyone else, I'm glad the thug Saddam is gone too, but what we've left is a power vacuum that is quickly being filled with radical elements on both sides and laying the groundwork for civil war. Meanwhile, US companies are basically looting the country's wealth, doing their best to squeeze every last penny out of the country before the handover becomes official.

    I think it's really cool that linux is gaining ground in Iraq, but the grandparent poster is correct -- linux isn't going to stop the the looting, it's not going to solve the security situation, it's not going to work without electricity, and it's not going to bring freedom or stability to a nation teetering on the brink of civil war.

  63. cool - a new justification for the war by commodoresloat · · Score: 2
    So you're saying the invasion was justified not because of WMD (which never materialized), not because Saddam had ties to al Qaeda (which everyone with a clue agrees that he did not), and not because we would "liberate" Iraq (since we've been against having local elections from the beginning even though many in Iraq have been begging for them, we've shut down newspapers, we're installing a handpicked leader who has been working with the CIA for years, but rather because it might increase the number of linux users in the world. About 10,000 Iraqi civilians dead, exactly 841 American soldiers dead, who knows how many civilian contractors, and over $119 billion spent, and it is worth it why? Because there will be more people recompiling their linux kernels on a saturday night!

    You'll have to forgive the Iraqis if they aren't yet jumping for joy about the open source revolution; they may have other things on their minds right now.

    1. Re:cool - a new justification for the war by rotor · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... That's an interesting one. Let me go back and read my initial post. Ummm yeah - the point of it was summed up in the sentance

      "It seems a little ironic that people who are so against what the Bush administration has done in Iraq are so excited about the freedoms that the Iraqi people are starting to see as a result of those actions."

      I don't really give a damn if they're working on Linux over there. There are enough people working on it as it is. Read the thread if you want justifications for the war.

      As far as your claims on WMD and al Qaeda ties, stop reading the New York Times and look at the smaller stocks of serin and vx that have been found and listen to even the most liberal of the 9/11 Commission calling BS on the reports that they've found no ties to al Qaeda. They released statements after that report came out two weeks ago that the report was false and that there was plenty of credible evidence of ties.

      --
      Addlepated - punk & metal
    2. Re:cool - a new justification for the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some questions to ask:
      1) did the Germans ever attack the US during WW2?
      2) how many civilians were killed by US forces during that war?
      3) how many US soldiers were killed?
      4) how long did that war last?
      5) how much money was spent rebuilding germany after the war-couldn't that money have been better spent in the US?
      6) Would you have supported the war effort if FDR happened to be a Republican?

    3. Re:cool - a new justification for the war by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sorry; you're misinformed. You're saying the one sarin rocket that was found -- and even US generals admitted the Iraqis didn't seem to have any idea what this thing was -- is evidence of Iraqi WMD threatening enough to the US to justify an invasion? Hell, there are rednecks in Idaho stockpiling more chemical weapons than have been found in Iraq! What's more, the sarin weapon found was a binary weapon, that most observers agreed was probably manufactured in the US and probably sold to Saddam by a US or German company before the 1991 Gulf War. The question to be asking is not whether there is evidence of WMD ever existing in Iraq but rather whether there was a large enough WMD program existing in 2003 that it was a significant threat to the US, and the answer to that question is clearly and resoundingly "NO."

      As for al-Qaeda, again, you're misinformed. The 911 commission found no significant COOPERATION between SADDAM HUSSEIN'S GOVERNMENT and al Qaeda. That is very different from saying no ties at all between Iraq and al Qaeda. Of course there have been "ties"; al Qaeda is a very successful international terrorist organization partly because it attempted to cultivate ties to intelligence agencies around the world. All the evidence is that such attempts failed with respect to Saddam Hussein's government. Hell, there are "ties" between al Qaeda and the CIA that are more significant than those claimed in Iraq! While the panel did find that there was communication between these parties, no evidence suggests there was cooperation and in fact much evidence suggests that the relationship between these two entities was rather hostile. The CIA disputes the specific claims of one of the 911 Commission members (hardly the "most liberal" one, as you say), and the evidence that many raise about Kurdish cooperation with al Qaeda in northern Iraq hardly supports the case. Even if that evidence is true, that area was not under Saddam Hussein's control at all since the 1991 war, when it became part of a "no-fly" zone. Did you even read the 911 Commission's comments on the issue?

    4. Re:cool - a new justification for the war by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      you're talking about another war in another era. The analogy might hold a tiny shred of substance IF Iraq was a relentlessly expansionist power like Hitler's germany. Remember, the US attack was a totally preventive attack. It was not a response to some attempt by Hussein to take over the world. It was, many would argue, totally unprovoked. Iraq, by 2003, was totally contained as any kind of threat to its neighbors (hell, Iraqi authorities were not even allowed to fly over huge parts of their own country).

  64. Asymmetric Propoganda [re: truth is out there] by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 2, Informative
    Can't help but comment on you sig, "The Truth is Out There" linking to Moore's 'Unfairenheit 9/11' website

    In the interest of balance and intellectual honesty, you might wish to also link to the Iraqi Torture Video

    hand amputation

    finger chopping

    beating with metal pipe

    arm breaking with metal pipe
    ... presumably more videos exist but DOD refuses to release them

    From the Wall Street Jounal Online Edition:

    The American Enterprise Institute held an unusual video screening [several days ago], and hardly anyone showed up. One who did was the New York Post's Deborah Orin: The video only lasts four minutes or so--gruesome scenes of torture from the days when Saddam Hussein's thugs ruled Abu Ghraib prison. I couldn't bear to watch, so I walked out until it was over.

    Some who stayed wished they hadn't. They told of savage scenes of decapitation, fingers chopped off one by one, tongues hacked out with a razor blade--all while victims shriek in pain and the thugs chant Saddam's praises.

    Saddam's henchmen took the videos as newsreels to document their deeds in honor of their leader.

    But these awful images didn't show up on American TV news ["the truth is out there" but being hidden from us???].

    In fact, just four or five reporters showed up for the screening at the American Enterprise Institute think tank, which says it got the video via the Pentagon. Fewer wrote about it. ["the truth is out there" but being hidden from us???]

    [snip][snip][snip]

    As Orin notes, this "raises a very complex problem in the War on Terror. It's worse than creating moral equivalence between Saddam's tortures and prisoner abuse by U.S. troops. It's that we do far more to highlight our own [western liberal democracy] wrongdoings precisely because they are less appalling."

    Part of the problem may be that the press hasn't quite figured out how to deal with such "asymmetric propaganda," [the internet changes everything ;-];-];-] as Orin calls it. Yet it doesn't seem that it would be that hard to provide context--to make sure that every story about American abuses at Abu Ghraib also included graphic descriptions of what went on there before Iraq's liberation.

    [snip][snip][snip]

    --

    I believe Juanita

  65. You have no idea what you're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just because Saddam Hussein was a tyrant doesn't mean it's ok for the US to be a kinder, gentler tyrant. Iraq was in trouble before the US went in there but are they truly better off today? Have more or less Iraqis died under a year of Hussein's executions or a year of US military collateral damage? We won't know for a long time since the DoD refuses to keep track of how many Iraqis they've killed, like Hussein. Hussein kill people in Abu Ghraib but so didn't the US.

    Why didn't the US simply have Hussein charged with war crimes and brought in front of the WCC like Slobodan Milosevic? Also there are countries in a lot worse shape like Burma/Myanmar yet I don't see Bush running in there. Oh, I forgot, Bush cut an oil pipeline deal with their dictator while their elected leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, has sat under house arrest for over ten years. BTW, that pipeline is being built with mostly slave labor.

    The main reasons Bush invaded was to:

    Avenge the threats against his father

    Look good to the world for booting Hussein. Opps, that didn't work out to well.

    Get a shit load of money to Halliburton and make him and Cheney some big ass bucks. Didn't you know that Bush also owns a large amount of Halliburton stock?

    Bush is also a piece of shit for sending troops in without enough proper body armour or armour plated vehicles. And before you blame Kerry for it (like the RNC is telling you to) Bush could've signed an Executive Order to get those items to the boots on the ground. As a six year US Vet the man sickens me.

    Let's not forget that Bush did not attend his reserve drills for over two years (starting just before the military started regular drug testing). Anything over thirty days is desertion.

    Two wrongs don't make a right. Replacing one dictator with another doesn't fix anything.

  66. Re:Oh, Woe is dialup(and vicariously me)! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No! This is Slashdot. We'll be discussing everything except the article

    Some articles are too over-the-top for even me. This is one of them.

    On June 30 a puppet gubment will be put in place and everything will be so cool except for the exploding oil pipelines and rigs. How is anyone supposed to take the issue of Linux use in that country seriously?

  67. An assumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're assuming that there will be a significant population left after America's illegal war on Iraq for anyone to care.

  68. Supporting Data ??? [Re:You have no idea what ...] by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 1
    The main reasons Bush invaded was to:

    Avenge the threats against his father ... disregard due to no links to supporting data and it contradicts the available evidence Joint Authorization and US Public Law 105-338 and UN Report on Subject (read all 17-pages :-) and UN Resolutions violated by Iraq (btw, each resolution had 'diplo-speak' as in "serious consequences" authorizing war - don't say the US did it without the UN ;-)

    Look good to the world for booting Hussein. Opps, that didn't work out to[o] well. ... disregard due to no link(s) to supporting data ... BTW, it didn't work out too well in post-Nazi Europe/Japan either

    Get a [childish expletive deleted]load of money to Halliburton and make him and Cheney some big ass bucks. Didn't you know that Bush also owns a large amount of Halliburton stock? ... disregard due to there being no evidence that Bush Jr. ownes any Halliburton stock Bush 2003 Tax Return ... perform further research with respect to Cheney due to an "it's a stretch" connection Cheney 2003 Tax Return ... and also here leading to:

    The forms Thursday showed he collected $162,392 in deferred compensation [think 401k - therefore this is not the big bad Halliburton connection you claim] from Halliburton Co., the Dallas-based energy services company he headed until Aug. 16, 2000. Cheney elected in 1998 to recoup over five years a portion of the money he made in 1999 as chief executive officer of Halliburton ... SUGGESTION: you should chat with some HR compensation folk who can explain this other "deferred compensation" plan (its the 'other' 401k the HR types don't talk about to individual contributors). Most companies have this 'other' 401k plan - lucrative but very restrictive tax-wise - perhaps almost like a blind-trust. However, IANAL also IANACPA

    From Christopher Hitchens' review of "Unfairenheit 9/11":

    The majority of pacifists either belong to obscure religious sects or are simply humanitarians who object to taking life and prefer not to follow their thoughts beyond that point. But there is a minority of intellectual pacifists, whose real though unacknowledged motive appears to be hatred of western democracy and admiration for totalitarianism . Pacifist propaganda usually boils down to saying that one side is as bad as the other, but if one looks closely at the writing of the younger intellectual pacifists , one finds that they do not by any means express impartial disapproval but are directed almost entirely against Britain and the United States ... (Orwell's Notes on Nationalism in May 1945)

    ... and still more from "Orwell's Notes on Nationalism" ... thank you Chris Hitchens from tickling my intellect such that I dug for more info ... love the internet

    --

    I believe Juanita

  69. What about .IQ ccTLD? Adam? by jwkckid1 · · Score: 1

    I read the article: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=04/06/21/22392 47 and the interview: http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/0 2/02/1415224&tid=106 regarding "More On The Open Sourcing Of Iraq" with great interest. But was a little disappointed in not seeing anything regarding .IQ ccTLD and internet activity or connectivity in Iraq as of today. Any info on that Adam? Regards, Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827

    --
    Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
  70. Iraq was no threat? by rotor · · Score: 1

    Iraq was never any sort of threat to us.


    Iraq planned attacks against the US. And that came from Vladimir Putin. He and the Russian intelligence community told our government about these plans in the time leading up to our operations in Iraq.

    WMDs have been found in small quantities - just not the stockpiles that had been claimed. Also the engines required for delivery of these weapons (engines which were banned themselves) have been found among scrap metal sent to other countries from Iraq during the time in which the inspections were going on.

    I don't remember a connection directly to 9/11 being hyped by anyone in the administration. Sure, there was press speculation of Iraq financially backing it, but that's all. The administration said that there were ties to al Qaeda regarding training with chemical weapons. The types that have been found in small quantities, and the types that an al Qaeda member caught in Saudi Arabia a couple months ago admitted he'd been trained on in Iraq.

    --
    Addlepated - punk & metal
  71. GNU/Linux OS, made in USA by tepples · · Score: 1

    when did The good ole US of A get control of linux?

    Europeans may control the Linux kernel, but much of the rest of a typical GNU/Linux distribution is Made In USA. A public database of trademarks registered in the USA gives the following:

    • Debian: Software In The Public Interest Inc., New York
    • Fedora: Red Hat Inc., Delaware
    • Gentoo: Gentoo Technologies Inc, New Mexico
    • GNU: Free Software Foundation Inc., Massachusetts
    • Knoppix: derived from Debian and possibly subject to re-export law
    • Mandrake: derived from the precursor to Fedora and possibly subject to re-export law
    • Slackware: Patrick Volkerding, California
  72. wow, my first troll mod!!! by morie · · Score: 1

    Wow! My first troll mod

    Can somebody explain to me why iI got it? I don't mind somebody not finding my joke funny, but how am I a troll??

    I suggest this comment gets moderated offtopic. That I could understand and then I can sleep at night...

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)