Slashdot Mirror


Linux for Non-Geeks

norburym writes "This is not an intro Linux book for your mom. Well, actually it's an intro Linux book for the author's mom! Linux for Non-Geeks came about by virtue of Rickford Grant's desire to create an easy to follow guidebook to installing, configuring and using Linux for his mom who, at 72, was on a fixed income. Her erstwhile son suggested giving her an old box of his with Linux installed. Willing to go along, she asked for book suggestions to learn about Linux. Stumped by the meager offerings, Grant decided to write up a set of instructions on his own. Egged on by relatives and friends to subsequently publish his manuscript, Penguinistas the world over can now rejoice! A far cry from dumbed down editions of how-to comic book style manuals from other publishers, No Starch Press has adopted a smart series of books for the capable, no nonsense audience; those folks who are not afraid to try new things and who want a clear and (more importantly) practical approach to enhancing their skill set. This book is a stand out in that series." Read on for the rest of norburym's review. Linux For Non-Geeks, A Hands-On, Project-Based, Take-It-Slow Guidebook author Rickford Grant pages 336 publisher No Starch Press rating 8 reviewer Mary Norbury-Glaser ISBN 1593270348 summary A Hands-On, Project-Based, Take-It-Slow Guidebook

The title explains exactly how Grant's book is laid out. It's for Windows users, Mac users, and new or inexperienced Linux users who are non-geeks (or wannabe-geeks) and who are itching to take the plunge into Linux without having to wade through a multitude of books aimed at power users, online HOWTOs, weblogs and IRC channels. This is one volume with enough worthy information to credit the cost of the $34.95 investment.

The content is based on Redhat's Fedora Core and includes CDs for installation. As such, the author has chosen to go with the default Fedora desktop, GNOME. Choices have to be made: Fedora Core vs. Mandrake vs. SUSE vs. Xandros etc., and GNOME vs. KDE vs. Enlightenment, etc. Grant has chosen stability and ease of use, and he has chosen well. Fedora would have been Redhat 10, had Redhat gone that route. They didn't and we can all lament the changes the company has launched toward focusing on corporate gains or we can move on. Moving on, we can see immediately that Fedora Core is excellent and if Red Hat's idea in Fedora's community focus is to go the Debian route and have lots of experienced eyes taking care of this project, then it will continue to be excellent. Once you get into this book and get your fancy tickled by Fedora and GNOME, go wild. 'Nuff said.

The first two chapters of the book cover the 'penguinista' mindset (why you're even looking at a book on Linux), hardware compatibility and the install process. Easy enough, and Grant does a great job of leading the reader through this process. It's the scary part, after all! Once the deed is done, the reader is introduced to Chapter 3, 'A New Place to Call Home'. Gnome is the desktop of choice and the author goes into detail, easing the reader through a wealth of GUI options. Lots of screenshots and photos give the reader a clear sense of what to expect when they are navigating through the choices. Lots of time is spent on customizing and some may find this trivial but there is nothing more frustrating to the beginner than being told to "click click click" when they aren't comfortable finding the correct windows, buttons and choices. After spending some time on this chapter, the reader will be able to progress through the book with confidence.

Connecting to the Internet is the next chapter, with information presented on hardware, connection options, using the browser, email and IM. The Internet is a must-have so this chapter is well placed. Get 'em going and they'll keep plugging along!

Once the reader is up and running, a side road is taken for those who want to get more familiar with the GUI and who like to tweak everything to look as individual (and tacky) and they can.

After getting on the Web, printing is probably next on the list in importance. Grant dedicates Chapter 6 to explaining how the reader can achieve good printing karma with printer support, printing to PDF, changing settings and handling queues.

Part one of external media is covered next, with an introduction in to floppies (whaaaa?), data and music CD reading/playing/burning, and ISOs (an absolutely necessary part of life for Linux users, especially since we all tend to experiment with different distros when they become available!).

With Chapter 8, we get into the core of every OS user's skill set, no matter how newbie the newbie is, one thing everyone wants to know how to do on their platform of choice: how to install applications (did I say "games"?). Grant gives the reader a very well written chapter on package management, walking the reader gently through four examples, including Skoosh and -- woo-hoo!! -- Frozen Bubble (well, we all need Frozen Bubble!). He even gives the reader a taste of "dependency hell" (don't panic! It's a controlled environment!). There will be a few folks who complain that RPM is Redhat-centric thinking and they'd be right. We are working with Fedora Core after all. Remember the "'Nuff said" above'?. Grant later presents chapters on APT and Synaptic and also on compiling a program from source so the reader has ample chance to get geeky.

A (too short) chapter on the terminal and the command line is wedged in between with practice projects on pyWings and pyChing that brings it all home. Part two of data management comes next, covering USB storage devices and the Windows partition, if there is one. Chapters 13 and 14 deal in depth with music (audio formats, mp3 support, apps like Grip, Rhythmbox and XMMS) and 'getting arty with the GIMP' (including how to scan and use your digital camera).

Then, it's back to business, with several chapters dedicated to workplace productivity and what options are available to Linux users in a 'dark side' dominated world. Grant looks at several office suites including OpenOffice.org (the clear winner) as well as KOffice and some stand-alone apps like AbiWord, Dia, Gcalctool and GPdf. There is also quite a bit of excellent coverage on fonts (a must read!) and finally, language support within Linux.

Now, if everything is working well so far and you can connect to the Internet, print, get your work done and play games. So what's left? Doing it all from your living room, bedroom, even bathroom! In short, going wireless. Grant succinctly explains what it means, what you need and how to do it.

The last few chapters of the book deal with bits and pieces of necessary information that are essential to the reader for further Linux exploration: system settings and system updates, KDE, 'odds and ends' and the requisite troubleshooting section for "uh oh, now what do I do now?" moments. Lots of help and resources round out the book.

A few things could have been expanded on or included: a bit more on firewalls and internet security (we are not entirely immune, after all), handling email attachments is missing (the author promises an update to this on his web site), something on yum and device installation; the slim description of installing a CD-RW drive in the book merely refers the reader to his web site where one can download PDF instructions ...hmmm, that seems a bit skimpy. Installing drives and cards (especially sound cards) would have been a nice chapter on its own, especially since this would most likely require re-compiling the kernel. The reference to this on Grant's web site results in a 'broken' pdf link and no obvious way to alert the author to the damaged file.

At this writing, there are only a few errata but it would be wise to take a peek at Grant's site before delving too deeply into the book.

Overall, I like how Grant chose to lay out his chapters; he's anticipated the needs and expectations of the level of reader he's targeting and placed well-constructed topics in a logical series of chapters. Nicely balanced information for a new Linux user, an on again/off again Linux user or for the switcher (is that trademarked?!). Other distros will be a short leap after reading this one volume. So yes, I lied: Linux for Non-Geeks is for your mom -- and for you, too, come to think of it. (And are those references to Vonnegut scattered about? Erudite crowd, Linux folk, yes?)

You can purchase Linux For Non-Geeks, A Hands-On, Project-Based, Take-It-Slow Guidebook from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

260 comments

  1. "Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...desire to create an easy to follow guidebook to installing, configuring and using Linux for his mom who, at 72, was on a fixed income. Her erstwhile son suggested giving her an old box of his with Linux installed....


    I do not think it means what you think it means.

    See here.
    1. Re:"Erstwhile"? by space+oddity · · Score: 1

      yeah - thought he'd died when i read that - or maybe she disowned him for trying to help?

      not sure what you think it means but it aint right.

    2. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Otter · · Score: 1
      I do not think it means what you think it means.

      You beat me to the punch, while I was still trying to imagine what on earth he does think it means.

    3. Re:"Erstwhile"? by HelbaSluice · · Score: 5, Funny

      Simple. She got so confused trying to install and run Linux using his book that she disowned him.

    4. Re:"Erstwhile"? by madprof · · Score: 1

      That book must really suck...

    5. Re:"Erstwhile"? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Yeah. Right.

      KFG

    6. Re:"Erstwhile"? by CatLord42 · · Score: 1

      Why not? Here's the link anyone could do for themselves:

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=erstwhile %20

      I can only guess he thinks it means something totally random (to us).

      Hmm. Her random son? ;-)

      --
      Meow. Now!
    7. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      closest I can imagine, he meant "earnest"

    8. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...desire to create an easy to follow guidebook to installing, configuring and using Linux for his mom who, at 72, was on a fixed income. Her erstwhile son suggested giving her an old box of his with Linux installed....


      I do not think it means what you think it means.

      perhaps he was her inconceivable son?

    9. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure seems wrong to me.

      Though, my Oxford Compact dictionary defines the base "erst" as being "formerly; of old". Is it possible that (seeing as I have seen numerous other similar [mis]uses) "erstwhile" has aquired a different meaning of "long-time" (of old)?

      "Mee sooo hoorny, me love you eeerstwhile!"

    10. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the effort of writing the book killed him.

    11. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess he meant "firstborn".
      "Erst" = "first" in German.

    12. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Random_Goblin · · Score: 2, Funny

      esrt while son

      surely he just means to erst as long as the condition son is true?

      ah... i'll get me coat....

    13. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Random_Goblin · · Score: 1
      perhaps he was her inconceivable son?
      doesn't that lead to some sort of grandfather paradox?

      *insert tumbleweed here*
    14. Re:"Erstwhile"? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      Accept it, get over it.

      Like a popular joke, the common ad hominem criticisms of someone else's spelling/grammar/writing mistakes are getting old and over used.

      It may have been funny at one point.

      It may have even been a cheap way for the critic to make himself or herself look scholarly at one point.

      Now, such criticisms are just old and boring.

      If anything they make the critic look like s/he doesn't have anything intelligent to say about the content of the message at the best and at the worst it makes them look mean/adolescent.

      If a person does not have anything to say about the meaning of a message or if they desire to make themselves appear to be more intelligent they would be better served by reading something on the topic of the message rather than dissing someone else with some cheap tactic.

      No offense to anyone and I am not addressing anyone in particular

    15. Re:"Erstwhile"? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      All you're doing is "correcting" people's conduct, in just the same way that they're correcting the poster's misuse of a particular word. You presumably imagine that people will learn from your rebuke and not make the same "mistake" again, in the same way that those commenting on the misuse of "erstwhile" hope that others will avoid making that mistake.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  2. Dude, she's a MILF!!! by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mom Installing Linux Fervently

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    1. Re:Dude, she's a MILF!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and also
      ALS: Approaching Linux for Seniors

    2. Re:Dude, she's a MILF!!! by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

      I think the F stands for "frequently," at least until she finds a distro she likes.

  3. yeah! by techefnet · · Score: 0

    hehe, its good that we get more good books about installing/using linux, then maybe linux will get more accepted by people/comapnies (its already came a long way tho..).. cool that 70 year old moms use linux for sure ;)

  4. But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can think of one major reason. Security. Actually, given how bad windows security has been lately, I'd recommend that most users not use windows unless their geeks and know how to keep it clean, and free of Spyware. I already install mozilla whenever I come across a Spyware infected machine. There is some Spyware that infects mozilla on win32. (The user gets a warning about installing XPI, but it's not even as menacing as IE ActiveX warnings. On the other hand, many Spyware programs install themselves via security holes in IE)

    Running as non-root on a Linux machine is much safer for the naiveté surfer then running windows.

    We'll have to see how XP SP2 fares as far as protecting users from all the people who want to rape them.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by mandalayx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      reason #2: free as in beer.
      reason #3: geek friend is evangelizing :)

    2. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strange argument, the ones that cant keep windows secure, not an immensly difficult task these days with the tools available, are the ones least likely to be able to run linux, or are you suggesting they install something friendly like linspire or whatever its called today which runs as root by default I believe?

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      You cannot keep Windows secure as long as you are running IE and Outlook.

    4. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by sqlrob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless one of those tools is a hardware firewall/router, it is an impossible task, especially for the non-geek.

      My father is set up with Linux, and doesn't know squat about computers. He has no problems with it whatsoever (well, over and above the same PEBKAC ones that existed with Windows as well). Of course, he doesn't *maintain* that system, I do. He doesn't know what root is or even that it exists.

      A HW firewall would have been a more expensive and difficult proposition in his case - dialup. How common are dialup routers (no, I don't mean "do they exist", I mean walk into Best Buy or Comp-USA and get one).

      The average time between connection to the ISP and a Blaster hit was 8 seconds. Nimda was 2 and a half minutes. (Times are from a little less than a year ago) How is a non-geek going to protect a Windows system from that?

    5. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Funny

      reason #4: babe magnet.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    6. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Especially as this book is about Fedora -- which comes with a basically broken Up2date applet thing.

      Welcome to Linux, Mom, where everything is secure!

      Step 1: Read the manual for 'yum'
      Step 2: Use google to locate repository mirrors
      Step 3: Learn vi so you can update a configuration file

      Yeah, right.
    7. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

      How is a non-geek going to protect a Windows system from that?

      By patching on time? A visit to Windows Update every two weeks or so should work.

    8. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by LadyMayhem · · Score: 1

      Running linux isn't all that difficult with the tools available. With KDE or Gnome I find it as simple as running windows ever was. It is no more difficult to install than windows, the programs are easy to use, anything you could need comes with the OS (at least in the case of some one who isn't computer saavy), and on top of that is the added bennifit of good security and paying nothing. As for a program that automatically runs root, why would any one want to do that? At least for down loads and such root is a password away.

      All n' all I dont see the problem.

    9. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange argument, the ones that cant keep windows secure, not an immensly difficult task these days with the tools available, are the ones least likely to be able to run linux, or are you suggesting they install something friendly like linspire or whatever its called today which runs as root by default I believe?

      I think the argument is that the people who hardly know how to install anything would be better off with Linux. They don't need to install a firewall, at least one but preferrably two adware scanners, a virus scanner and a new web browser to be secure with Linux. Okay, to be fair _maybe_ I should say "don't need to yet", but we are all living in the present here, right?

      (P.S. Linspire hasn't run as root by default since before it was called that. Oh well, accuracy not required on SlashDot, yadda yadda yadda. Now tell us about XP Home.)

    10. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by sqlrob · · Score: 0, Redundant

      On dialup?

      And how does a non-geek buy a computer, hook it up to the net, and download patches without getting compromised, even assuming that they know using AV and Windows Update is a prerequisite? The box will be owned in a matter of seconds.

      Buy a new Windows computer and out of the box, it *cannot* be safely hooked up to the Internet to get the patches to make it safe to connect to the Internet. How do you resolve that Catch-22 for a non-geek?

    11. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      s/and/or/

      Better yet...

      s/IE and Outlook//

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    12. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "A HW firewall would have been a more expensive and difficult proposition in his case - dialup. How common are dialup routers (no, I don't mean "do they exist", I mean walk into Best Buy or Comp-USA and get one)."

      Not common by "species", but there's at least one good one. Check out Apple's Airport Extreme base station with modem option. Mine's been a godsend. Trashed my Linksys within 5 minutes of installing the Airport.

      Even CompUSA (usually useless) should carry them - just be sure to verify it's got the modem option. And yes, they're more expensive. Worth every extra dime in saved frustration for me.

    13. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The average time between connection to the ISP and a Blaster hit was 8 seconds. Nimda was 2 and a half minutes. (Times are from a little less than a year ago) How is a non-geek going to protect a Windows system from that?

      Why do you think Symantec is such a big player? I see their suites bundled with a lot of new machines, at least as much as MSOffice. Shold be safe out of the box. It nags you to get updates, or probably can do it unattended. Otherwise, one of several software firewalls (eg ZoneAlarm, which has a free version if you spend a minute to find it) are easy to set up (even for a non-geek) and stop most of these direct attacks.

    14. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Buy a new Windows computer and out of the box, it *cannot* be safely hooked up to the Internet to get the patches

      If it's a "new" Windows PC, XP has a firewall built in. Turn it on. Then download the patches. Or, again, as it's "new", ask the retailer to show you how to do this, and either to patch it before you take it home &/or supply a CDR of the current patches (the "network install" free from MS's update site). If you want to think of your PC as an appliance, fine, treat problems with it the same way you would with your refrigerator, if it breaks the first day ask the dealer to fix it.

    15. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Alranor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Granted, I could possibly be wrong about this, but I thought the XP firewall started after the network interface, thus giving all those lovely worms out on the net a nice window of opportunity to infect the PC while it's booting.

      Can someone confirm this?

    16. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by sfe_software · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, given how bad windows security has been lately, I'd recommend that most users not use windows unless [they're] geeks and know how to keep it clean, and free of Spyware.

      I agree somewhat, but I do believe things are getting better.

      On the one hand, I do know many people with (relatively) new XP-based machines that, upon a "system restore" cannot connect to the 'Net long enough to get the necessary updates. Of course I end up walking them through enabling the firewall, or (as was the case today with my cousin) aborting the shutdown that one of the XP/RPC-based worms causes...

      ...but, SP2 does promise to at least enable the firewall by default. Granted, a properly configured machine shouldn't require a firewall, but I wouldn't run a Windows box without one (and preferrably either a hardware-based firewall, or an external *nix box). But it's a great start.

      Had XP (or 2000) had an enabled firewall by default, we'd have been much better off, all the way back to Code Red/Nimda up to the latest ones (I stopped keeping up any more, but there was an RPC based one, and one that hit LSASS.EXE, etc)... so like I said, it's a great start.

      Also don't forget the Honeypot project a couple of (few?) years back. IIRC (which I probably don't) they connected a RedHat 6.something box to the 'Net, and it wasn't 30 minutes before it was rooted via an automated worm (or whatever)...

      The point is this: Microsoft is *finally* getting some things right. They may be sacrificing some ancient backward-compatibility in favor of security, but they're finally doing some things right. Granted, every other OS in the world is far ahead in most of these areas, but it still is nice that MS is getting there...

      It will be nice to not cringe whenever I hear a relative say "I'm finally getting a computer!"...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    17. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, the one which has a reverse polarisation?

    18. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent use of FUD my friend. You could have of course checked if you were talking bollocks (you are ) before you posted your little karma-whoring post, but where would the fun in that be?

    19. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting full nvidia support for games
      Getting your USB camera to work
      Getting your iPod to work
      Getting decent sound support


      All fairly trivial tasks that would have a n00b searching for their XP disks in frustration. You knew that anyway, so please go back to your dick-waving.

    20. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Alranor · · Score: 2, Informative
      And of course you can cite the fact that i'm talking bollocks?

      The reason I asked it here is because I recalled something along these lines having been mentioned previously on Slashdot and thought I might get a quick reply.

      Since you asked, i've checked, and while I may have been incorrect, I certainly wasn't talking bollocks, as you so eloquently put it.

      From Technet's page on changes in SP2

      In earlier versions of Windows, there is a window of time between when the network stack was running and when Windows Firewall provides protection. This results in the ability for a packet to be received and delivered to a service without Windows Firewall filtering and potentially exposes the computer to vulnerabilities.


      While I was mistaken as to exactly why this was, the fact remains that, prior to SP2, even if you had the XP firewall installed there was a window of time at boot when the PC was unprotected, quite potentially for long enough to become infected.
    21. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Tiram · · Score: 1

      It worked on me! My Linux geek and I have been going steady for two years now, and we moved in together half a year ago. Last week we got cats:)

      --
      The knuckles, the horrible knuckles!
      (I'm a girl, you know)
    22. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by penguinbrat · · Score: 1

      Well, I can say from experience that non-geek users install Linux because of the security (virii,worms,spywayre,etc..) and Windoze simply not working right. My mom's computer was recently infested with 1/2 dozen viruses before she realized it, and when she did she was pissed about it. I walked her through installing GenToo over the phone, when KDE was finally up and running she kept repeating the same words - "cool", "wow", "oh, neat!". All she know about the command line, is "emerge -s [insert app name]" and "emerge [insert app name]", she is in love with it! I've introduced another girl in my class to Linux via, Knoppix and going to help her install GenToo also - she is installing Linux because for what ever reason ME doesn't like her new DSL and simply will not work - she gets the famous blue screen all the time. She's on an older computer and can't afford a $1,000+ for a new version of windoze plus the hardware - Linux to save the day!

    23. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Anthony+Stuckey · · Score: 1

      I don't know if Best Buy sells them, but my mother's house has had a 3com OfficeConnect 56k for the last 18 months. It's worked wonderfully.

    24. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by cascadefx · · Score: 1

      My parents have an old 98 machine that was decommissioned from my Dad's employer and he was allowed to have.

      They don't own any other computer and buying a new one is too expensive.

      The system has to be wiped and it won't run newer versions of windows and they want me to set it up.

      I already told them that they are going to be set up with Linux. The cost matches and they are less likely to get virus infections and there are no Linux spyware apps (the bane of Windows support) that I know of.

      They only want to be able to play mahjong, solitaire, get email, run spreadsheets, and get access to the web.

      All of that can be accomplished with Linux.

      I told them that they won't be able to walk into a store and buy software for their computer, but there are free/open source options for most things that they might want and there are web services (like H&R Block web tax) for some things that don't have equivalents.

      I will also be able to remotely admin their system over their dial-up(remote desktop in Windows would be a bit too slow).

      They are excited...

    25. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by k12linux · · Score: 1

      For example to get the patches for the IE hole announced a week or two ago? Oh wait, MS still hasn't released a patch and people's PCs are being "infected" by some big-name web sites. At least according to this article.

    26. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by LadyMayhem · · Score: 1

      USB camras work fine for me, i dont have an iPod, archos works though even if it isnt as sleek. As for the rest i've just never had a problem

  5. In other words... by lboxman · · Score: 5, Funny

    This IS TFM

    --
    Regexes are like cocaine. The first hit is pretty good, but afterwards you try to use them to solve all your problems.
    1. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Have you read it?

    2. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for sending me home with a smile. "This is TFM"? That has got to be the funniest comment I have ever read on Slashdot.

    3. Re:In other words... by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other words...

      This IS TFM


      I thought that was the Kama Sutra.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    4. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Considering that the story involves a 72 year old woman, that's not the sort of image I like to get while I'm eating.

    5. Re:In other words... by Jim_Hawkins · · Score: 1

      You're new to Slashdot, aren't you.

    6. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is Slashdot.. TFM is the instructions on the back of your microwave burrito package.

    7. Re:In other words... by eoyount · · Score: 2, Informative
      I thought that was the Kama Sutra.


      No, TFM for Slashdot is called the Karma Sutra

      Thank you, I'll be here all week.
      --
      To understand recursion,
      you must first understand recursion.
  6. Normal People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wouldn't it be nice if it actually got more normal people to start using Linux?

    1. Re:Normal People by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      it would definitely make me take a look at it. At least it doesn't seem to have the condescending tone that too many Linux sites/tutorials have.

    2. Re:Normal People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just don't expect them to post on slashdot.

    3. Re:Normal People by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      it would be, except....then instead of convincing people to try a new OS thats different....you have to convince them to read a book *and* try a new OS thats different.

      If theyre too lazy to learn how to click buttons that only look different, how the hell do you expect to get them to read something? Linux will take off a bit better when you don't need a book to use it.

      As it is a new drive may need mounting, people will need to know what root is, *why* root is, and why they shouldnt use it all the time, and they'll damn sure want to know why numerous programs cant be downloaded and clicked on to install them.

      Some people arent open-minded enough to try something new, some people just dont have the time to learn how to use a very different operating system , whatever the bonuses, because they have a life and want things to just WORK.

      Example? I installed Knoppix on my brothers pc, his windows copy was pirated and kept messing up. When it installs, it installs symlinks on the dekstop to the optical drives which, eventually but *randomly* fail. After checking in 2 or 3 forums I still havent had a clear explanation of how to fucking get them to work properly; and its the kind of thing youd expect knoppix of all distros to do so you wouldnt have to mess with it.

      But I do have to mess with it, nothing I try has worked, and I hope to hell someone and the knoppix forums has a better answer tonight than they did last night; cause as much as I prefer linux...this is a total waste of time.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  7. At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by sdo1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I won't buy those on principle even if they may contain pertinent information on a subject I'd like to learn about.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by TheAdventurer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I buy them if I need to learn about something they cover. I am confident enough in my intelligence not to be put off by a silly book name. ;)

    2. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Funny

      I won't buy those on principle even if they may contain pertinent information on a subject I'd like to learn about.

      Agreed. I won't buy any Dummies books, for the same reasons I wouldn't buy the popular Calculus for Fuckwit Retards or Programming for Crackhead Asshats.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    3. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by JNighthawk · · Score: 0

      There is a HUGE difference here. It's just a silly damn title that's not insulting or inflamatory in any way, unless you're way too uptight to appreciate the books anyways. They deliver all the knowledge necessary in simple steps. I learned to program C++, VB and script PHP from for Dummies books.

      Hey, Aardpig, they might even have How To Laugh at Yourself for Dummies, because if you are looking for a manual on a subject that for Dummies covers, then you probably no squat in the subject area, hence making you a Dummy.

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    4. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you have "pig" in your username.

      I guess you're so pompous that'd you'd only buy books for "geniuses"?

    5. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dummy.

    6. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since I'm intelligent enough not to believe in sympathetic magic I feel no particular aversion.

      YMMV

      KFG

    7. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's only insecure nerds that have a problem with the "Dummy" label -- when you lack any social skills, you have to comfort yourself by telling yourself you are "smarter than everyone else" (even when you don't know jack shit, see most /. posts).

      The average intelligent person has no problem saying "I'm a dumb about Auto Repair/Home Buying/Whatever, I don't know anything about it.", and buying a book.

    8. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by agraupe · · Score: 0

      Get over yourself. You, I imagine, like most other people, are not born possessing all the knowledge in the universe. If you are worried that it will make you look non-1337, or whatever the hell else, then I wouldn't suggest any thing "for smart people".

    9. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      then you probably no squat in the subject area, hence making you a Dummy.

      That would be 'know'. LOL, hoist on your own petard!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    10. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      I guess you're so pompous that'd you'd only buy books for "geniuses"?

      Hmmm, looking at my bookshelf.... Knuth... Stroustrup... yep, I guess you're right!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    11. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by another_henry · · Score: 1

      This curious "dummy" is confused about how that relates to the parent comment... could you explain?

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    12. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by kfg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sympathetic magic is the belief that like effects like. Stick a pin in the likeness of someone and he'll feel pain, break a stick to protect against snakes, etc.

      Ultimately this was applied to words as well. The practice of "spelling" comes out of the belief that a word for something "is" that something, in the same manner that a voodoo doll "is" the person it represents. There is an innate "sympathy" between the noun and the thing it represents. A modern psuedo scientist might call them an "entangle pair" on his website trying to sell you secret mystical books of power (a grammar).

      So the idea that I'm trying to convey is that I am not influenced by the book being assigned to "dummies" or that it has the spelling "dummies" on its cover. It has no hold on or power over me. I may purchase it, borrow it from the library, read it, absorb its contents, but that does not in any way make me, or imply that I am, a "dummy" because that is just an arbitrary sound/collection of letters arbitrarily assigned by some marketing geek (in the pejoritive sense of the word) who believes in sympathetic magic.

      Plus I have this magic crystal that some gypsy women sold me to protect me from "dummies" books.

      I don't suffer the editions that treat me like a dummy gladly, however. Some of their authors apparently don't have a magic crystal.

      KFG

    13. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by PushyB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back in the good old days, if a contraption didn't work as advertised, the problem was either bad design or bad instructions. Since the dawn of high tech, people have accepted the silly idea that if they can't make it work, they must be dummies.

      At least this book acknowledges the idea that there are intelligent people out there who don't want to roll their own or even use a command line.

      My own forays into Linux have been plagued with all sorts of problems. I usually bug my SO (who is a linux evangelist) and frequently there is no easy answer.

      I am glad of any attempt to ferret out the most likely questions and concerns and address them as though dealing with an adult.

      --
      Denise
      Will manage Novell network for money.
    14. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by dhammabum · · Score: 1
      Hey, i found Programing for Crackhed Asshats very helpful. I'm looking froward to contributing to kernel development with my kickass code.

      --
      I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
    15. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      I might buy the last one, just for the joy of people seeing it on my shelf at work.

    16. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by brad3378 · · Score: 1

      Today I was visiting one of the local casinos and I laughed out loud when I saw one of the slot machines decked out in a "winning for dummies" theme.

      --

    17. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i no squat either. i no know no-one who no squat. i know lots of people who do not KNOW squat, however.

    18. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by BobWeiner · · Score: 1

      It's good to know that users still do have a choice.

      --
      The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    19. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying the books are okay because it's just a joke, but you didn't catch the joke yourself? ;)

    20. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation :)

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    21. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by lovejoyman · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      If I'm interested in a topic or have something I want to accomplish but need more knowledge in order to do so, I don't care what the title is as long as it helps me.

      Usually a "Dummies" book I've read leads me to more intermediate books which then lead to advanced books and topics. Learning begets learning.

    22. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      When I worked in ISP tech support I sent someone to Barnes & Noble for "Dialup Networking For Complete And Utter Jackasses". I'm not sure if they found it or not, but they didn't call back...

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  8. Sounds great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I still think using that the elderly using Linux with increase their number of gray hairs and raise their blood pressure :P

  9. More! More! More! by Metteyya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux community definitely needs more books like that and users like that. Only increase of Linux desktop boxes can push software developers/companies to writing their for-now-Windows-only software for penguin system.
    Additionaly, this is the only way to surpass the chicken-egg problem, as software companies aren't willing to (as we can see today) port their software to non-Windows.
    So, kudos to author!

    1. Re:More! More! More! by penguinland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, this is wonderful. As a person who considers themself a geek, but does not know very much about Linux, I think this book could be marvelous for me. I've been wanting to switch for a while now (sadly, I'm still on XP Home). The thing that's kept me back is that I don't know how to use Linux well, and don't know what questions to ask to get better at it. I have a box running RedHat 7-or-so, but I screwed it up by changing something I apparently shouldn't have (I can't find my programs as root anymore :-P). This lack of Linux know-how has been my main reason for sticking to windows, and now hopefully, I'll be able to change that. If more people could write books like this, the world would be a pretty great place.

      --
      "Flying is the art of throwing yourself at the ground and missing." - Douglas Adams
    2. Re:More! More! More! by eille-la · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows dosent need a book to use it in a simple way.
      Computers are now seen as powerfull tools that saves you time!
      When you are not a computer geek, reading a book to learn how to use the computer is WASTED time.
      What could be nice is a really simplest-default-configured and already installed KDE without too much features visible at first, as it is scary and obligate to learn why there is that much apps installed if they are for the same use.
      Simplicity dosent need a book.

      The book is maybe a good thing for people with much of free time and willing to really learn someting.

      But my point in this post is that I think it could be better to concentrate this kind of energy (wanting to see F/OSS more used by public) in developing and organising a really easy way to use a desktop computer. KDE seems the best at this time but there are still too much things to understand and learn to make it as main stream as it could be.

    3. Re:More! More! More! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still see people advertising these "How to use your computer" cds that help you to learn such complex topics as "Windows" and "MS Word". So, I'm not convinced that a brand spanking newbie with a new Windows machine will immediatly know what to do either.

    4. Re:More! More! More! by eille-la · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looking at computers users now, in western coutries, I wonder if the people not using desktop computers (ms windows) will ever do. These ones are probaly relatively old compared to the younger who have been raised in a much more computer supported society.

      Brand new average young users have no problem at all to explore enough the desktop computer and software in order to do what he wants. I think the culture now make this easy.

      Young users can already figure out how to get things done if you present them an installed and ready to use KDE screen. But there is some lacks (which would be a long offtopic post) that show, compared to windows, that usability isnt good enough yet.

      There is a market for the light-geeks who buy the "for dummies" books about everything (how to burn CDs, etc). But to get the majority on a diferant (free) OS you have to make it usable as easily as windows is now. After you can think selling these useless books to everyone who will want to buy them.

      And for the ones who will cry about "linux should not try to copy windows!":
      Windows is a model of usability that the world currently know and use everyday.
      You must integrate many similar aspect of usability if you want people to switch to free os one day.
      And of course there is many good things in windows, thats not all bad. But being a closed source os simply make it as evolutive as a very little and simple blue painted plastic piece lost in a desert (a big desert).

    5. Re:More! More! More! by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      since its not the early 90s anymore, almost everybody is used to windows.

      you cant make a system thats so intuative that people used to the windows way will beable to use it straight away.

      there is no way of installing any operating system on a bare box without knowing how to change the boot order and understanding partitions (or logical drives). (my grandpairents wouldn't beable to install windows xp or any linux distro as theyve never owned a computer)

      there's no way of making it obvious how to use something different, without making it the same.

      KDE is simple enough for anybody to use, without being patronising (hiding files from people)

    6. Re:More! More! More! by eille-la · · Score: 1

      Well, should we expect end users to install linux themselves?
      When a linux desktop is gonna be a real strong alternative to windows, it will come pre-installed with sold computers.

      And for the intuitive system, if the user knows he got a new kind of OS (not a microsoft product), its gonna be easy to understand how to use it if it look more like windows. Their intuition have been forged by microsoft windows and such... there is no choice to start where microsoft is leaving, the monopoly caused everyone to think in the windows way.

      I just can't wait to see how will evolve a true F/OS desktop system with the majority of people using it, and much of them making it getting better every hour.

  10. Speaking of red hats... by jejones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever hear of the Red Hat Society? It's a society inspired by that "When I am old I shall wear purple..." poem. I think Red Hat is missing a neat tie-in by not giving Red Hat Society members Fedora Core discs, or maybe this book. Hordes of older women using Linux would pretty well put a stake in the heart of the "Linux is too hard to use" BS.

    1. Re:Speaking of red hats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have heard people say that it is too hard to use a lot, and I agree, it is not a simple, single brain cell point and click for all but the most basic operations, and GOD FORBID!!!!, if someone asks a stupid question they will frequently get attacked for being stupid, or get irrelevant answers...

      Q: what do I have to do to see my windows partitions in Mandrake....
      A: Dont use mandrake, is much better, your an idiot if your using mandrake...
      OR
      A: Just get rid of your windows partition, windows is crap anyway...

      This kind of crap is why I put off using linux for so long, and why, despite all the many (oh so many) problems with windows I am not going to recomend to less computer illiterate people to use.

    2. Re:Speaking of red hats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Linux is too hard to use" BS? Are you joking? Do you know how much jargon and arcane naming schemes you have to learn just to get it all hooked up?

      Look at yourself. If your job involves computers, or if you know how to program you are not a competent person to judge whether or not Linux is easy.

      When there actually is more than one or two grandmothers who can use and configure linux without the help of their technically savvy grandson, then I'll recommend it to friends. Ten years? Twenty perhaps? But not today.

  11. Hello Granma. by xenostar · · Score: 5, Funny

    - Oh, Hello Grandma, what'd you get me for Christmas this year? - Well, me and grandpa thought about it and decided to give you... our .bash_profiles. Hope you like them.

    1. Re:Hello Granma. by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      Well i suppose they though giving out the HKLM section of the windows registry was too simple for them and it would be considered a present that not much thought was put into?

      end users dont play with ~/.bash, just as they dont play with the windows registry or regserv32.dll.

    2. Re:Hello Granma. by JPriest · · Score: 1
      1) Put your left hand all the way up in the air.
      2) Now place your right hand all the way up in the air.

      3) The next time a comment goes completely over your head, at least try to intercept it.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  12. Business Plan by DaveKAO · · Score: 5, Funny

    1.) Have sad story about good'ol Mom.
    2.) Write Geekish book and get free PR on slashdot.
    3.) ???
    4.) Profit!!!

    1. Re:Business Plan by .+visplek+. · · Score: 1

      What a great idea! Write a book for your mom and have it published. He could have just printed her a copy on his well supported HP Deskjet.

      --
      - Save a tree, eat more woodpeckers
    2. Re:Business Plan by howman · · Score: 1

      This is one of the rare examples where 1 and 2 are actualy #3...
      Whodathunk?

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
    3. Re:Business Plan by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Isn't 3) Sell book for $34.95 ?

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    4. Re:Business Plan by isorox · · Score: 1

      1.) Have sad story about good'ol Mom.
      2.) Write Geekish book and get free PR on slashdot.
      3.) ???
      4.) Profit!!!


      There's no step three though, it goes straight to profit

  13. I call bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Curing Cancer for Dummies" wouldn't make you whip out your wallet?

    1. Re:I call bullshit. by phraktyl · · Score: 1

      If it only targeted dummies, I wouldn't be worried about it. I'd call it survival of the fittest.

      --
      Karma: Marginal (mostly due to the border around the website)
  14. Non-Geek Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely the first chapters must be devoted to the great Linux jihads!

    Chap 1: Gentoo is t3h 1 4 u
    Chap 2: KDE was here first
    Chap 3: Becoming a man of vi
    Chap 4: What of Redmond? (Onward Linux Soldiers)

    Hell if they're going to be linux users, the least we can do is teach them the basics, eh?

    Then the appendices --

    Appendix A: How Are You Gentlemen? (Blending in)
    Appendix B: Attacking Your Leaders (They're blowhards, hackers, they're blowhards!)
    Appendix C: Forums of Attack (Slashdot, Installfests, LUG meetings, etc.)

    1. Re:Non-Geek Linux? by Metteyya · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have another proposals:

      1: r341 h4ck0rz uz3 LinuxFromScratch
      2. f*ck GNOME and KDE, r341 h4ck0rz uz3 WindowMaker
      3. r341 h4ck0rz uz3 vi/emacs (choose your favorite and stand near one side of this neverending flamewar)
      4. r341 h4ck0rz uz3... I mean they don't use...

      Yes, I think that MY concept of book would make a great basic reading for all those linux-users-to-be.

    2. Re:Non-Geek Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Chap 5: homosexual orgies with hung and horny black men on the down-low.

  15. What if by iMaple · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This is not an intro Linux book for your mom. Well, actually it's an intro Linux book for the author's mom!

    What if the author has a sibling(from the same Mom). If he/she reads the article he is going to be confused no matter how well written the book is.

    1. Re:What if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drums: ba-dam dish'

    2. Re:What if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ???

  16. non-geeks ? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I only have very limited experience with non-geeks using linux, but my experience has shown that they don't read, and don't think they should have to read to use linux. My non-geeks don't even pretend to solve or diagnose the problems, they just call for help immediately. I think the non-geeks this book would help most, are those already solving their problems using google.

    1. Re:non-geeks ? by mandalayx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ever played a video game without reading the manual?

      yeah, I think it's like that.

      crack open your car manual one day, too. there's some useful stuff in there. like how you're supposed to check your tire pressure regularly.

    2. Re:non-geeks ? by Tongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a linux thing, it's a non-geek using a computer thing. For many months after introducing my Mom to a computer I had to constantly remind her to read the messages that popup, and call me if she didn't understand what it was saying/asking. For some reason new computer users (windows/linux/otherwise) always just click away at whatever button is the closest to their mouse. It comes down to them not understanding, not caring, and just wanting the damn popup to go away.

    3. Re:non-geeks ? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I only have very limited experience with non-geeks using linux, but my experience has shown that they don't read


      You just summed up one of the major impediments to desktop Linux and to the tightening up of security in general.

      You have a choice between the insecure POS, which they know, and the very secure OS which they don't. They don't want to learn anything new. At all.

      Today I tried to set my mother up with Trillian, so she could use MSN Messenger and be able to click links (we-read I-have Sygate set up to not allow connections from IE, which MSN is hard coded to use. If any MSN developers are out there, I hate you forever) and go auto away and countless other things she could use.

      She refused to use it because she wouldn't change one of the ways she does things, namely changing her online status (normally it's in a menu at the top, in Trillian it's in a submenu in a menu at the bottom). She could have enjoyed her-brr-online experience much more if she'd stuck at it, but after thirty seconds of not trying-"I don't like this. It isn't the same.".

      Damn newbies :)
      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:non-geeks ? by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      I also find that sometimes that non-geeks annoy me when I'm looking over their shoulder and they have to read every word of every message that pops up. After some time with Windows, every geek gets to know what the general information and warning messages are and if they're important or not...

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    5. Re:non-geeks ? by blindbat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is why I won't install Linux for most friends. I will help those who will help themselves, but for some who have asked I tell them to stick with Windows. Why should I waste my time keeping their systems running when they won't do anything to learn on their own.

    6. Re:non-geeks ? by DigitalBubblebath · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say I was a geek (ok, I read slashdot ;), but I would find this book very useful.

      I *really* want to learn how to use Linux for many reasons, but I just don't have the time to sit down for hours and hours and figure everything out on my own.

      Something like this could prove an invaluable shortcut for me. Remember, not everyone has a lot of time on their hands!

    7. Re:non-geeks ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just summed up one of the major impediments to desktop Linux...

      im sorry, you are wrong. this is one of the failures of desktop linux, and to a lesser extent windows as well.

      people are there to use the operating system, its the other way around. most times anyone complains about the 'stupid users' they are making a fundamental mistake. most desktop users dont want to use a computer. they want to perform a task. the computer is just the tool to that task and it should stay out of the way as much as possible.

    8. Re:non-geeks ? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      For some reason new computer users (windows/linux/otherwise) always just click away at whatever button is the closest to their mouse. It comes down to them not understanding, not caring, and just wanting the damn popup to go away.

      About 10 years ago we had a book shop with a database Point-of-sale system, that included details of about 20,000 books. Because this database was incredibly valuable to the business I'd set up a daily backup program (which involved 5 sets of floppies, just press the menu selection to start and feed the floppies in), and a Norton Disk Doctor check on every boot.

      After making sure the staff understood how to use this I felt content. A few months later I got a call that thy had problems, the system was failing somehow. So I went back, booted, and saw an incredible number of disk errors. The staff said this was "normal", had been happening for weeks, and by pressing Escape the error messages would go away. Pulled out my hair a bit then, wondering why they had never mentioned this to me when it happened. So it turned out that the hard disk had some bad sectors. OK, so restore the backups to another PC. All 5 sets (Mon, Tue, Wed, Thurs, Fri) were corrupt, as they data had gone bad over a week earlier and the "good" sets had been overwritten, the entire database was lost. The staff went back to ringing up sales by hand. The shop went out of business soon after (sales were terrible; would have happened anyway.)

    9. Re:non-geeks ? by Karora · · Score: 1

      I only have very limited experience with non-geeks using linux

      While this is no doubt true for you, you should consider also that a book doesn't have to be a solution for everyone for it to be a very worthwhile and useful book.

      My own mother certainly would read such a book. Whenever my parents get some new technology she will sit down and read the documentation, cover to cover, going through all of the examples, until she understands it. That might not make her an average 70-year-old, but it does mean that there is some sort of a market for this.

      So while my father would fit more within your experience, my mother would love a book like this to go with her shiny new Linux install.

      Unfortunately I haven't got my parents running Linux yet. I did try once a few years ago, but had problems getting my father's #1 most important application working: Microsoft Encarta World Atlas.

      I am tempted to try again now though (using the latest Wine, WineX or Crossover Office to run the Windows apps) because I think that the experience would be better for them now they've gone through the nightmare of a brand-new (but unpatched) Windows XP box and a dial-up internet connection.

      If I do try again I think I will definitely be buying them this book, or something similar, to go along with the installation. At least they are already happy users of Mozilla and OpenOffice.org :-)

      --

      ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
    10. Re:non-geeks ? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like a ...nonbie.

    11. Re:non-geeks ? by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The bad thing about using a search engine to try and look for helpful guides is that most of the guides on the internet for linux installs/usage are complete technical rubbish. Plus, the information is so scatterred and contradictory that it makes it virtually impossible to do a google on "linux guide" and come up with anything that makes sense to the average person.

      Having a centralized, easy to use guide for Linux is fucking priceless. I have tried to install Linux more than once, and have run into contradictory information within the first couple of pages of their own manuals! It's quite absurd. "Little" things like partitions and file system choices can make or break an OS install.. and they've always broken mine.

      --
      Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
  17. Fedora Core by sp00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The review talks about using Fedora, but doesn't mention whether it's version 1 or 2. This would be nice to know, especially since there are some major differences between the two.

    1. Re:Fedora Core by porkrind · · Score: 1

      It's Fedora Core 1, but we chose not to emphasize that because the target audience doesn't really care :@)

      -John Mark
      Acquisitions Editor
      No Starch Press

  18. Mothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somewhat sick and tired of sorting out my mother's PC from virii, trojans, spyware ad infinitum. I wiped her box and installed RH (should have used Debian in retrospect).

    Interestingly, once she knew which icons were for email, word processing and browsing, she was off. Her only problem was when her ISP changed dial-up telephone numbers, and the moron on support only had windows experience (or script). He claimed that the service she'd been using fine over the last year didn't actually work with Linux. A quick ssh and change of telephone numbers had her online again(*).

    She even found out how to add a new printer on her own, something she never managed to do with windows.

    (*): The telephone number changed meant that the previous low rate number became a standard cost per minute, and massively increased her cost of being online. The ISP didn't bother to notify her, and it wasn't until she got a phone bill that was 5x higher than normal that we knew something was afoot.

    1. Re:Mothers by iReflect · · Score: 1

      How did you SSH to it if it couldn't get online?

    2. Re:Mothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      over the network... from his parents' basement.

    3. Re:Mothers by jroop · · Score: 1

      I suppose he could have her set the modem to answer and call her via modem. I dunno.. I'm on cable now and forget all that dial-up nonsense... ahhhh... ignorance is bliss...

      jroop

    4. Re:Mothers by cammoblammo · · Score: 2, Funny
      She even found out how to add a new printer on her own ...

      Something ESR has trouble with. Well done, mum!

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    5. Re:Mothers by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 1

      He may be a moron because he claimed that it wouldn't work with Linux, but don't call him a moron because he doesn't have any experience with Linux. I know some highly skilled technicians that have no Linux experience (myself being one of them).

      Ooooh, you don't have experience with (insert program/OS here), so you must be an idiot!!!

      Cut out the infantile attitude. That attitude is half the reason more people don't switch over, jackass. Mod me down if you like, this asshole had it coming.

      --
      Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
  19. Seems like a good book to support by grunt107 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am setting up a Linux (JDS) system for my grandparents, who keep saying they'll never learn. To this end I have been creating a screen-captured document of the common tasks (login, read email, reply to email, delete email, fwd email, create/open documents in OOo, play CD). This book may shortcut some of this. The easier something is to understand the more often it gets used.

  20. Rickford Grant's Mom comments on the article by iMaple · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am a geek, You insensitive clod !!!
    Rickford Grant's Mom

  21. I hope his book isn't like his webpage.. by x.Draino.x · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at this write-up on why GNOME is better than KDE. I am a GNOME fanboy, and I still dis-like his article. He doesn't provide any really good reasons why one is better than the other. Just lousy opinions with no backing. I really hope he put more thought into his book.

    1. Re:I hope his book isn't like his webpage.. by cxvx · · Score: 1
      I hope his book isn't like his webpage..

      I can't even start to imagine reading a book with white letters printed on black paper.

      The pain that would cause would probably make me want to poke my eyes out :)

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  22. teach the CLI by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My parents can't move to Linux because they need specialized Windows apps not to be found this side of the divide. Nope, nor Gracenote nor LillyPond make for even decent musical typesetting packages in a professional environment.

    Yet they keep messing up their files dragging-and-dropping to wrong places or generally fucking up with the GUI.

    So I got them Cygwin and Bash, and taught them to manage their files that way. It works.

    1. Re:teach the CLI by sls1j · · Score: 1

      Try mups found at www.arkkra.com. It's a very nice musical typesetting program.

    2. Re:teach the CLI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... what exactly is lacking in, say, Rosegarden/Lilypond? It gives you much better results than you could EVER hope to get from, say, Finale. What is it exactly that your parents use?

    3. Re:teach the CLI by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1


      Try Rosegarden. It's a decent Cubase-like app.

      Just a suggestion.

  23. Read the website more careully Re:I hope by iMaple · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rickford's writeup is not on why GNOME is better than KDE. He writes on Why I like Gnome better
    He doesnt really make any claims just says why he likes somethings. Infact he says Just to be fair, however, I should state that KDE is no dog. In fact, the first Linux desktop environment I used was KDE, and it was sufficiently impressive to reel me into the Linux world for good. and concludes the article with Enjoy finding out which environment is best for you by playing around - that's half the fun, after all. Which to me doesnt seem like KDE bashing at all.

    1. Re:Read the website more careully Re:I hope by x.Draino.x · · Score: 1

      But he ends the article with "you know what my advice is". Not a very convincing article for someone who might be looking for direction. I also think it's odd to display a very amateur piece of writing on a website that advertises his book.

    2. Re:Read the website more careully Re:I hope by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Yeah , u do have a point there.

  24. My statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, I have come to a conclusion. I have silently read Slashdot for several years and have seen COUNTLESS references to this on-going project of having "mom use Linux".

    Today, I came to a realization. Each and every poster on Slashdot has a mom-fetish. That is the ONLY explanation. Every mention of mom is either posted or moderated up. Mom mom mom.

    Christ, quit with this horrid maternal obsession, please.

    1. Re:My statement by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Mommy, He says I have a fetish .... Bohooo

      Moderators read the parent ... Haha now you have to mod me up

    2. Re:My statement by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      lets watch your post get modded down for mom bang^H^Hshing.

    3. Re:My statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. You're taking this in entirely the wrong context. When we say 'mom' we don't mean our mothers, we mean the ongoing project to develop an artificial intelligence based on the AI from MoM (Master of Magic).

      HTH.

    4. Re:My statement by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Awww, mom, do we have to?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    5. Re:My statement by RKone2 · · Score: 1

      I think it's just that slashdotters can't stand having a windows box in the house.

    6. Re:My statement by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      If there was ever a +6 funny comment in Slashdot, this one would be it... :D

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  25. Linux for Non-Geeks? Yeah Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's like saying "Windows for non-Morons" or "AOL for the Technically Competent"

    1. Re:Linux for Non-Geeks? Yeah Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deny deny deny..

  26. gone that route by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grant has chosen stability and ease of use, and he has chosen well. Fedora would have been Redhat 10, had Redhat gone that route

    which would have been Redhat 17 if they had gone Slackware's route... which would have been Redhat 23 if they had gone Mandrakes route... which will be SCO Linux 2004 when SCO decides they want to get into another lawsuit, by claiming Linux kernel 0.1 is a derived work of SCO Linux 2004.

    1. Re:gone that route by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      slackware linux jumped versions because red hat had a much higher version number, and people kept asking (apparently) "when will you be upgrading to linux 8" or something along those lines. read slackware's FAQ (i'd link but im lazy)

  27. Linux for Non-Geeks? by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blasphemy! Burn the heretic and his unholy scribblings at the stake! Oh, ye cursed, ye fool! You'll have worse things to worry about than dependency hell. May Saint Ignucius have mercy on yer wicked soul.

    Alexis de Torquemada

    Chief Inquisitor

    1. Re:Linux for Non-Geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face it- ya can't Torquemada anything!

  28. A trend? by mratitude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One can only hope. When I first admitted that I was interested in C programming (remember Power C's $20 compiler and libs?) I was scrounging for books that would definitively explain C programming from the point of view of a novice, NOT a programmer!. In the early 90's, that nearly didn't exist. The technical priesthood still held sway and they did demand their tithe.

    The early Linux efforts at documentation carried through with the priesthood mentality - Every person writing the documentation just assumed you already knew what he or she knew and what they wrote offered only what he or she thought you needed to know. Not all mind you, but most.

    Which is the worst assumption any writer can ever make, IMHO.

    --


    Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
    1. Re:A trend? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Every person writing the documentation just assumed you already knew
      Excellent point. I am frequently critized for assuming that everything I know is common knowledge, and giving presentations that don't present enough background to the audience.

      I can imagine this is a downfall with geeks writing documentation in general. Everything we know is now obvious [to us], so we only document the non-obvious parts.
      The new reader tries to use the docs, but finds themselves frustrated because the docs start out at too high of a level, and the additional resources they refer to are also at too high of a level for the beginner.

    2. Re:A trend? by YoungHack · · Score: 1

      Yes! I loved PowerC. It had the greatest debugger. I still have a licensed copy around somewhere.

  29. For an audience of 3 by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With all due respect to the author, who I'm sure wrote a fine book, no one sits down and reads whole manuals. Some people will grab a manual to find a solution to a problem. The rest will ask someone, do a workaround, or do without. 330 pages? That's about the thickness of a John Grisham book. (Though I'm sure this one has more pictures.) IOW, huge.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:For an audience of 3 by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With all due respect: I LOVE reading manuals!! I enjoy the format as some like the cliff-hanger aproach of novels. The first "manual" on Linux I read (and this was so that I could install RedHat 4.0 on an old 486 EISA based swerver) turned out to not be a manual at all. The author had grabbed every HOWTO and Mini-HOWTO he could find, then interspersed that with Usenet posts and spell checked IRC replies. In spite of this eclectic editorship and the fact that Linux of that vintage on a purpose built Netware box just can't be done, I done it. Why? because I read novels the way other folks watch TV..
      You start on PC Mag, migrate to (the old) Byte, before you know it you are drooling over the fold-outs in Dr Dobbs... The reading of tech lit is in itself a joyous exercise.
      a non-geek book on Linux is exactly what the world needs.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  30. Good timing by bludstone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just installed my first linux (mandrake 10) this weekend.

    Of course, im a geek. Not a linux geek, mind you, but still a geek.

    Im having fun discovering a whole NEW slew of prolems to deal with. Of course, these are slight more managable then the ones i used to deal with :-)

    google, slashdot, and random linux gurus online have been wonderful. thanks folks! :D

    I should pick this up.

    --

    no .sig
  31. Linux for non geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Riiiiiiight, like that will ever happen.

  32. haha.. such futile attempts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    might as well write a book called "quantum mechanics for the blind, the stupid, and the illiterate"

    1. Re:haha.. such futile attempts by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      You insensitive clod! I am blind, stupid and illiterate, why shouldn't I learn about quantum mechanics too?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:haha.. such futile attempts by Auton · · Score: 1

      Such a book exists. I read it, and of course now cannot remember the title. Its main charatcer is a perfectly ordinary joe like you or me (or actually, on second thought, not much like you or me, more like the average joe... :) ) who has some very vivid dreams about relativity in between (and during) lectures. The combination allows even the more dense to grasp what relativity and quantum mechanics is all about, in broad terms.

  33. Re:Or you could just install a firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    She had been told many times about the standard problems windows users have to cope with, and how to minimize them. NAT router with a dial-up!? Twat. Besides, why should she have to buy hardward because the windows OS is a toy. Or maybe she should have bought win2k (then 300UKP).

    You are way off the mark an all accounts. Her installation was live after 23 minutes (yeah I know that's slow, but the box is slow!). Browser: mozilla, email: evolution, word processing: open office. All easily selectable at install if not part of the defaults. There was no install part of the OS, reboot, install some more, reboot, get drivers, reboot etc etc. Install virus checker, reboot, install tacky free/spyware so-called firewall, reboot. BTW the linux kernel has a real firewall built in.

    So bad luck there my boy, she has a clean, trouble free system after nothing more than a few minutes work on my part. Furthermore, she's not tied into any subscription virus check to keep her partially protected from a known, weak, trashy toy of an OS and associated virus magnets. Furthermore, my support time has been limited to the one single incident and she hasn't had to spent a single penny for a complete suite of applications for her needs.

    You say security through obscurity? Ever heard of IIS? Closed source, less than a 1/3 of the install base of the open source apache, yet compromised more than anything else. Hmmm, how many trojans have I had to content with with Linux over the last seven years? Must be the same as the number of viruses that hit me. Zero.

  34. Freud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on what I've read of Freudian psychology, it is quite likely slashdotters do have a thing for their mommy.

    Freud claimed that people normally develop oedipal feelings, but people can normally resolve them themselves. The common way to resolve this is to transfer those feelings from the mother to another woman (girlfriend).

    If you look at the situation of the common slashdotter (really, how long has it been since any of you even saw a girl?), it becomes apparent that many slashdotters are unable to resolve this issue.

    ...
    So maybe we could get the CDC to declare slashdot a medical disaster area and send in the needed "medical" supplies to treat our horrible [mental] illness.

    1. Re:Freud by Etcetera · · Score: 1


      Freud claimed that people normally develop oedipal feelings, but people can normally resolve them themselves.

      Nitpick: "People" is unnecessarily vague. Men (can) have oedipal feelings... women (can) have electra complexes.

      Here's a brief overview

  35. Linux in easy steps book by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 2, Informative
    I came across Linux In Easy Steps whilst browsing a bookstore today, and it's a great great book.
    I sticks to the Mandrake install, covers all the usual stuff (playing music, editing files, browsing blah blah) , and then finishes off with a bit of bash scripting.
    A superb intro for the newbie Linux people - i heartily reccomend it.

    No , i'm not connected with the book or the publisher in any way - i was just impressed with the layout and the usage of screenshots and the step by step explanations within , in purely non-geek terminology.

  36. Fedora vs Mandrakelinux by joestar · · Score: 1

    "As such, the author has chosen to go with the default Fedora desktop, GNOME. [...] Grant has chosen stability and ease of use, and he has chosen well."

    He would certainly been still more happy with something such as Mandrakelinux 10.0 Official, which is easier to use than Fedora, and more stable. Additionally, it's available for download for free, and benefits from official Mandrakesoft updates.

    Mandrakemove would have been an excellent choice as well since it doesn't require any installation and can store user's data on a USB key.

    1. Re:Fedora vs Mandrakelinux by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, of course! It would be impossible to have a discussion about Linux for "Moms" without someone bringing up "but distribution X does Y SO MUCH BETTER than the one you chose!"

      Yada yada, shut the hell up. There are hundreds of distributions, and a dozen that are actually usable. This book is about Fedora. If you don't like Fedora, that's fine, it's your choice. But don't sit here and tell the author of the book that he *should* have chosen a different distribution. Maybe he's never used Mandrake. Maybe he didn't know the new version was coming out. Maybe he doesn't have a USB key. For whatever reason, he wrote about Fedora, so just cope with it, ok?

      I'm sick of all this "my distribution is better than yours" penis-measuring. Get over it, people.

    2. Re:Fedora vs Mandrakelinux by Lshmael · · Score: 1
      This book is about Fedora. If you don't like Fedora, that's fine, it's your choice. But don't sit here and tell the author of the book that he *should* have chosen a different distribution. Maybe he's never used Mandrake. Maybe he didn't know the new version was coming out. Maybe he doesn't have a USB key. For whatever reason, he wrote about Fedora, so just cope with it, ok?
      Which would be fine if the book was "Linux for Rickford Grant." However, the book is for "non-geeks" to help them use Linux. As you admit ("There are hundreds of distributions, and a dozen that are actually usable."), the distribution you choose *is* important. It is possible that Mandrake is more user-friendly than Fedora (in my personal experience, Mandrake 9.2 was more user-friendly than RedHat 9), which would make it better suited to non-technical users.

      Suppose I wrote a book on Linux for non-technical users that used Gentoo, from a Stage 1 install. Using your reasoning, this would be fine, despite the fact that it would be a horrid book.
    3. Re:Fedora vs Mandrakelinux by Quebst · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of all this "my distribution is better than yours" penis-measuring. Get over it, people.

      Which distro has that app? I'd like the rumors to be certified once and for all.

      Sounds like a good idea, but if someone can't wade through installing and running of a modern distro, I doubt they'll make it far in the book.

    4. Re:Fedora vs Mandrakelinux by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      There are hundreds of distributions, and a dozen that are actually usable.

      I'm sick of all this "my distribution is better than yours" penis-measuring.

      But you just claimed 12 of the penises are longer than the rest. Did you mean you got sick of it between the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of your post?

  37. i dunno.... by Rooked_One · · Score: 1
    linux is a peice of cake if all you want to do is surf, write a document, and email...

    If you want to do anything else on the other hand...

  38. A polished turd still smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I don't think you can make a complex-often-broken-thing fit into the mainstream by writing a book about the complex-often-broken-thing targeted to the mainstream. I am a mechanical engineer with a math double major. I have been using Linux on and off since 1999. I can compile my own kernel, write a little code and my job involves networking industrial controls. I am the most tech savy person that I know.

    I got a new PC at work so I thought I'd install Linux on it and dual boot. I still use AutoCAD and PLC software that is Windows only. I wasted three days trying to configure 2 different distributions and eventually gave up. Everytime I try Linux I end up wasting huge amounts of time trying to get the last 5% of the install tweak the way I want.

    By contrast on Windows XP it took about 2 hours to install emacs, cygwin, apache, php, mysql, myphpadmin, thunderbird, and firefox. Plus I can change screen resolution by right clicking on the desktop. Imagine that, I just described how to change screen resolution in 5 words. I spent 14 hours trying to get XFree86 to accept the screen resolution I wanted. I must have read 50 printed pages worth of mesage-board postings, documentation, etc. I suceeded only to have it break again when I typed apt-get upgrade.

    I love Linux but I have found that its like being given instructions on building a gps unit when all I want is directions to the bathroom. And trying to hide the complexity behind control-centers and set-up wizards doesn't seem to help much.

    1. Re:A polished turd still smells by r00tdenied · · Score: 1

      Hmmm I find it funny that it took me only two hours to set up a SuSE 9.1 / WinXP dual boot system. Additionally I can right click to change my screen resolution in KDE. I think you're just spreading misinformation. . .

      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
    2. Re:A polished turd still smells by iamplupp · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, you can change the screen resolution from the desktoop in linux too. at least if you have gnome installed. (applications->desktop preferences->screen resolution)

    3. Re:A polished turd still smells by LadyMayhem · · Score: 1

      This really makes me wonder exactly what you were trying to do to the poor OS. I'm 16, not the most technical person on the block, and installed linux in 2 hours. The instalation was as simple as any michine I've put windows on, and has run quite well since then. There are numerous things I find much easier and some things I find harder but it shouldnt be giving you that much trouble. As for screen resolution, did you make sure your monitor supports it? if so two people already said how.

    4. Re:A polished turd still smells by sktea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      An Anonymous Coward wrote:
      I don't think you can make a complex-often-broken-thing fit into the mainstream by writing a book about the complex-often-broken-thing targeted to the mainstream.... I am the most tech savy person that I know.

      The word is "savvy." ("Damn that spell-checker! Why didn't it do its job?!")

      Out of curiosity, coward, what distros of Linux did you use? All of my dual-boot experiences with Windows (XP, 2K, ME) and Linux (Mandrake, Redhat, Fedora -- core 1 not core 2) have been good thus far.

      You seem to imply that Linux is more complex than Windows; I would not say so. Different, more involved, sure. Windows is complex too, only Microsoft made it look simple... flash and ease of use sell, or Windows wouldn't rule the commercial PC market. But sometimes too simple, IMHO. I call it the law of conservation of intelligence: broadly, the more intelligence you build into the tool, the less intelligence the tool user is willing to expend to figure out how to make it work.

      Regarding polished turds... I have a bias toward function, myself: I care comparatively little about the design or form if the underlying function is sufficient. Case in point: I maintain a few Linux servers whose interface consists of a command line. I have done little or nothing to make the administrative interface(s) user-friendly, which is of little matter if they work. In a pinch, I can direct a technician simply to reboot a server if it fouls up, but none have, since frankly they're too simple for much to go wrong. Polished, no. But it works.

      Then you've got Windows, which looks great, but occasionally -- okay, frequently -- has problems. I tend to focus on security, as that's my field, and Windows is not terribly secure. Polished, yes.

      Now which one, of Windows or Linux, would I call a polished turd?

      Of course there's a big difference between servers and workstations, although Microsoft successfully blurred that distinction years ago... sure, I run Windows XP, though I've hacked it a bit so not EVERY process runs in the system context, and installed so many third party add-on security products (antivirus, antispyware, antietc.) that it's noticeably slower than the hour of the initial install.

      I also run KDE, Gnome and Fluxbox. FWIW I tend to prefer Fluxbox; in fact I downloaded Blackbox for Windows and plan to give it a try.

      Anyway, what do you want out of your PC? If you want simple setup and operation, or compatibility with specific third-party apps, go with Windows. (But backup your data often.) If you want something generally more reliable, less demanding on your hardware and easier to control, give Linux or BSD a try. And maybe buy a book like this next time.

      (Last minute relevancy to topic -- yes!)

      --
      Sometimes I have to say to hell with it and just eat my jellybeans.
    5. Re:A polished turd still smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Linux works everything is fine, but at times it can be VERY picky about certain things, even if they normally should work.
      I really like linux, it's on my normal pc, my laptop and i use it daily and almost exclusively (though this is posted with windows), yet i find linux to be very complicated.

      There are a lot of solutions that have grown over time and have become so complicated by now, that it's very hard to do the most simple things without reading A LOT of documentation

    6. Re:A polished turd still smells by pan_sapiens · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yet another way to change screen resolution ....

      using a fairly standard Mandrake 10.0 install:

      Press
      and
      to toggle

      (obviously depends on whats in your XF86Config-4, but it should probably be okay by default anyway)

    7. Re:A polished turd still smells by pan_sapiens · · Score: 1

      argh ... I used pointy brackets, stuff got stripped (clearly exposed myself as a Slashdot n00b :) ) should say: press Ctrl Alt - and Ctrl Alt + to toggle resolution

    8. Re:A polished turd still smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can install Debian from the sarge test candidate in about 20 minutes or so. I'm a bit of a geek; CS major in college, technical consultant for a living and free time open source developer, but I really don't think linux is hard to use at all. Esp. Debian. It has always recognized my strange hardware and doesn't lose it's mind when I do something out of the ordinary (Windows was something of a crazy grandmother when I would do things my way). apt-get makes my world go 'round. Figured I represent the Debian side of things. :-)

    9. Re:A polished turd still smells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I tried to install Fedora Core 1 and Knoppix via hd-install(Debian). I used Knoppix and qtpartd to resize my XP partition. I could not get Fedora to give me a screen resolution beyond 800 x 600. I read all of the post on the internet about my graphics chipset and I tried various XFree86 config tools. Knoppix defaulted to a nice resolution so I did a hd-install. But I prefer Gnome over KDE. To get apt-get to install Gnome I had to remove a bunch of other software. Apt-get would just fail and say that it wasn't installing Gnome and display some dependencies. I thought apt-get was supposed to take care of dependencies! I figured there must be some unresolveable conflict but from the man page I could not firgure out how to identify the conflict. Eventually I did get Gnome installed and I then installed Evolution. But I couldn't get my Zire 71 to sync. I eventually figured out that I needed to pass the vendor and product information to the visor module upon loading. That got Kpilot and pilot-link working but gnome-pilot still failed. I read every posting about gnome-pilot/evloution/USB PalmOS devices on the internet and still couldn't get it to work. I eventually tried a apt-get upgrade and got 300MB worth of something. Apparently it upgraded my Gnome desktop. I don't understand why one day an apt-get upgrade gets a few small packages and the next day it upgrade the whole desktop. This upgrade broke gdm. KDE will still run as will a palin X session but Gnome will no longer start. I checked the logs and could find nothing suspicious. This is the point where I had wasted enough time and went back to XP.

      I'm sure that I could have persisted and got my system setup like I wanted. I could have ordered the CD set for Gentoo or FC2 (I don't have high speed access except at work where they frown on 600MB downloads). But the point is that I get paid to network industrial controls, install new equipment, respond to regulatory compliance audits, etc. Not to configure my workstation OS. I get 95% of the functionality of Linux by using Cygwin, MySQL, etc with 10% of the setup time. If FC1 or Knoppix/Debian had installed cleanly with Evolution and gnome-pilot working out of the box I would be using Linux now.

      If I want my Zire 71 to sync in Windows I do this

      • Go to palmone.com
      • Navigate to the download section and download the sync software
      • Double click the install software and click through the install wizard
      • Set Zire in cradle and push the sync button
      With Linux I had to do this
      • Find the palm configuration wizard in KDE
      • Click through the wizard and try a sync - Fails
      • Find the palm configuration wizard in Gnome
      • Click through the wizard and try a sync - Fails
      • Upon failure check /dev/pilot existence and permissions
      • Check /var/log/messages to see if the visor module is loaded and see what ttyUSB port is used. It uses 0 and 1.
      • Search the internet to see if /dev/pilot should point to ttyUSB0 or ttyUSB1
      • Create the /dev/pilot to /dev/ttyUSB1 link
      • Read the pilot-xfer man pages
      • Issue pilot-xfer -p /dev/ttyUSB1 -l command
      • Push the sync button - fails
      • Search the internet for Zire 71 and Linux
      • Verify that postings are related to my version of pilot-link and gnome-pilot
      • Modify /etc/modules.conf to pass Zire vendor and product ids to visor module
      • Try pilot-xfer - success
      • Try gnome-pilot, failure
      • Search internet for pilot-xfer workiing bu gnome-pilot broken
      • Try a dozen suggested fixes - none work
      • Try Kpilot -works sometimes
      • Give up because of work piling up while I tried to install and configure Linux.
      Like I said: I love Linux and open-source but Linux sucks up enormus amounts of time when something goes wrong and I have to fix it. I believe that Linux will be the last operating system. But it will be a while.
  39. car driver analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cars can be described in three ways:
    The dummy's point of view: "Oh look, pretty red color"
    The driver's point of view: "Turn the steering wheel to the right to turn right"
    The engineer's point of view: "The newton force required to make a 90 degree turn depends on the distance from the center of the steering column that the force is applied ..."
    This book will help only if it written for a car driver style point of view. Not dumbed down, not full of technical information that the computer user will never use.

    Car manuals and driver's ed books do not show you how your engine works. If you need to know that, you need to get a different book or have someone else fix it for you.
    Computer books for users should be the same. Just the info on how to use what you will use, very basic maintenance, and nothing else. If more info is needed to fix something, time for a more indepth book or a call to your local computer geek.

    Unfortunately I have yet to find such a book for computer users. They either go too dumb or to full of information useless to the end user (great for the geek and semi-geek though).

    At 337 pages, I am thinking this one may be just another failed attempt with too much info for the end user.

  40. Some more good reasons. by twitter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Security is nice but the big deal for me is all the beautiful, first class software that comes with any Linux distribution. This essentially boils down to KDE/Gnome, but the list goes on and on.
    1. Uptime. Nothing sucks so much as having to open everything I WAS working on every other day or so.
    2. Window managers with multiple desktops. One is not enough to organize work and play.
    3. Modern Browsers, Konqueror, Mozilla, even Galleon. Where would I be without tabs, pop-up blocking, and everything else modern browsers offer?
    4. Modern mail clients. Kontact, Kmail, Evolution, Balsa even. Kontact rocks for syncs to my handheld computer. What do you get with Windoze, a mail client that lacks a spell checker?
    5. GIMP and friends.
    6. K3B and Eroaster for burning CDs.
    7. No DRM to mess with my music. It is very nice to know that ogg won't go away and neither will any of my legitimately gotten music.
    8. APT, for getting all of the above without much trouble.
    9. The ease of install. Mepis goes on in 30 minutes or less and gives you everything the average user could want. One CD that runs live so you know it all works.

    That's a short list. I could think of more.

    Free software is more than stable and hard to break, it's excellent in every way these days. Fedora is very good too and addressing all of the reasons I moved to Debian based distributions two years ago but doing it with the same Red Hat ease of use I sometimes miss. The new interfaces are beautiful and functional.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Some more good reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD,

    2. Re:Some more good reasons. by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      And you, "Anonymous Coward", have spent how much bandwidth to complain about this guy? And how many hours have you spent compiling links to everything this guy has said?

      And you still don't have the balls to post with an identity?

      Now you know why you have Score: 0.

      The moderators may be stupid, but they're not THAT stupid.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    3. Re:Some more good reasons. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      What do you get with Windoze, a mail client that lacks a spell checker?

      Um, what are you talking about? Outlook Express has a spell checker.

    4. Re:Some more good reasons. by CoolCat · · Score: 1

      Modern mail clients. Kontact, Kmail, Evolution, Balsa even. Kontact rocks for syncs to my handheld computer. What do you get with Windoze, a mail client that lacks a spell checker?

      Sorry, but Outlook 2k3 is probarly one of the best mail clients around. Nothing I've used (Yes, tried all the above) even comes close, except maybe Mail.app on OSX combined with AdressBok and iCal as a good second place.

    5. Re:Some more good reasons. by James+McP · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like linux, but it has its problems. Where Windows is a fluffy, nerf environment with no locks, Linux is a hard and lockable place with lots of sharp edges.

      Here's my windows survival tips

      1. Uptime.
      Other than obsolete applications my company uses that the vendor won't even consider providing support on, I don't have crashes. My Win2k box stays on all week, only being shut down on the weekends.
      Run windows update and just pull out the silly crap that will try to DRM your machine. No Media player 9!

      2. Window managers with multiple desktops.
      I agree. Do a web search for IMPVWM.exe. I've been using it since Win95 and it's worked on every Windows variant I've tried. It occassionally fights with an application that will *not* let go of the processor, but otherwise nice. If need be email me and I'll send you a copy.

      3. Modern Browsers, Konqueror, Mozilla, even Galleon.

      Agreed, which is why I run Mozilla/Firefox on Win2k.

      4. Modern mail clients.
      Can't speak on this one; I've got a webmail server set up. Corporate uses Outlook2k3, which does have a spellchecker. But gawds, the Exchange server is slooooooow!

      5. GIMP and friends.
      Agreed. I run Gimp on Win2k

      6. K3B and Eroaster for burning CDs.
      Never used 'em. I have a few freeware burners I use.

      7. No DRM to mess with my music. It is very nice to know that ogg won't go away and neither will any of my legitimately gotten music.

      Agreed. I don't use Windows Media player and convert my own audio to MP3 or Ogg. (Yay Winamp!)

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  41. Computers for geeks and only geeks by Psymunn · · Score: 1

    No. No it wouldn't
    Usability shmoosability
    Computers where never meant to be usable, practical, or accomplish much of anything. The fact that they do was an unfortunate side affect and now everyone and their mom is apparantly using one.
    And then they complain when things go wrong.
    Things are supposed to go wrong!
    Afterall, if i don't have to work out why I have an error dialog popping up (windows), or why deleting a file called fstab suddenly stops me getting to things like my hard drive (linux) or if i simply don't have to reformat my computer every month or so, then i'm not having fun am i
    The inevitable loss to entropy of a file system, not to mention irriversable damage done to system files by my own short sighted tinkering, are what make computers what they are: a hobby.
    Unfortunatly, some people decided to tell the general world about the joys of the internet and e-mail and now, not only do we have to contend with the latest fad of cyber clutter (homepages, blogs, pictures of peoples cats) we get viruses and spyware to boot. And, while these viruses afford yet another welcome chance to reformat, suddenly you have to listen to your uncle joel complaining that his computer crashed.
    It's a toy. It's supposed to crash. It's a feature.
    Oh well... I'm only half joking. All I can say is at least the linux world are trying to provide easy to use, fresh out the box, systems for the productive, unknowledged members of the society, while still maintaining distros that, thankfully, make it as hard as possible to do anything in a speedious manner.

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  42. Still get spyware installed by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    even with mozilla as my browser. Must be all those pr0n sites!

    Admittedly, I'd say the average week's haul is only about 10, and I'm not convinced that Seek and Destroy's definition of spyware is altogether correct, some cookies are fine.

  43. FYI About Mozilla Spyware by Anthracks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't believe that vulnerability exists anymore in Firefox 0.9 / Mozilla 1.7. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238684 if you're interested in the details, but basically that patch made unrequested attempts to install an XPI illegal, sort of like how the pop-up blocker works. You have to click a link or something along those lines for the request to be valid.

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
    1. Re:FYI About Mozilla Spyware by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      Along those lines, this is probably the tip of the iceberg for future Linux vulnerabilities. Mozilla requires that you install .jar and .xpi code from untrusted sources to add simple things like themes. RPMs and other binaries are rarely signed in an easily-confirmable way. Who doesn't download RPMs for their distro from a 3rd-party site? Who checks every line of code before compiling?

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
  44. MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what have the blind to do with "stupid and illiterate"?

    1. Re:MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is it in braille.?

  45. well by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's not hard. But it seems that most people don't know anything more about their computers than how to use the start menu. A huge number of computers are infected with spyware, these days. And tons of them are left unpatched.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:well by E_elven · · Score: 1

      Nope, not start menus. Most users can use the desktop icons, though.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    2. Re:well by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      you're right, securing windows isn't hard at all! you only have to:

      • run windows update
      • reboot
      • run windows update
      • reboot
      • run windows update
      • reboot
      • install ZoneAlarm...oh wait, you already got pwn3d...start over...
      • re-install
      • run windows update
      • reboot
      • run windows update
      • reboot....
      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
  46. speaking of insecure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    speaking of insecure, why do you post then as anonymous coward?

    1. Re:speaking of insecure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you poas as an anonymous coward?

  47. Linux isn't hard ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does everyone keep talking like it's hard!? Wanna browse the web? click an icon. Wanna check mail? click an icon. Wanna burn a CD? click an icon. And just like Windows programs each mail reader and browser and what not are gonna have their own setup. Yes, some differences here, but Linux isn't harder, it's just different! Getting an internet connection in linux is no harder than it is on Windows if you have Cable; just turn the damn computer on!

    1. Re:Linux isn't hard ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever tried to get an internet connection with Linux when you don't have a cable connection but rather, say, an ISDN telephone line and an AVM Fritz! card classic? Turning on the computer (and even swearing during the process) will not help you in any way... :-)

    2. Re:Linux isn't hard ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanna set up some urgently-needed Windoze app with WINE? Wanna improve some garbled looking window layouts and fonts? And then wanna try to make it usable by not only root but also the other users on the system? Believe me, this can be done, but not by clicking an icon.

  48. Set yourself Linux tasks by Brandon+Glass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only way to really learn Linux is to get something into your head that you want to do, and then start taking a step by step approach to accomplishing it. For example, set yourself the goal of setting up a mail server, for example, and then start researching what steps need to be taken. Break the task down into sub-sections: Installing the operating system, securing the distribution of your choice, installing the neccessary packages, etc.

    I think that learning Linux seems a huge task to you at the moment not because it's beyond you, but because you have no direction in terms of what you want to do with Linux. I believe that almost everyone has the capability of running Linux successfully, but I don't think that it's suitable for all purposes, yet.

    I agree that books like this will help bring some people to Linux, but unless they actually have something in mind that they want to use Linux for, they won't get past the "installed Linux and messed around with KDE/Gnome a bit" stage.

    1. Re:Set yourself Linux tasks by Tiram · · Score: 1

      Personally, I use Linux for the exact same things as I use Windows: reading and writing plain text, e-mail and news; making Web pages and the occasional graphic; and a little surfing. That's about it actually. (If I described my work day like that, they'd probably fire me -- let's hope the boss doesn't read /.)

      Apart from making Web pages and the occasional graphic this pretty much covers what most computer users do as well. Why should they spend time actually learning Linux?

      --
      The knuckles, the horrible knuckles!
      (I'm a girl, you know)
  49. Token smart-ass comedian comment by Apostata · · Score: 1

    Quote: Erudite crowd, Linux folk, yes?

    1. Hey, it's Yoda! [chuckling to himself]

    2. Hey, "Erudite"? I thought this book was for geeks, not Greeks [holds his ribs as they swell with the expansion of his lungs as he laughs out loud at his clever retort]

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  50. Now wait just one minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I thought the idea was to get MORE people to use Linux. Like it or not, the non-geeks will be the deciding factor for the success of the OS, in whatever flavor we like to use it.

    The only thing I really care about is being a thorn in Billy boy's side. If that means getting Linux into as many Windows users' hands as possible, I'm all for it.

    I might be considered a semi-geek. I like to put together and troubleshoot hardware. Windows is all I've ever really used extensively. That is, until Mandrake 10 and suSE 9.1. I haven't booted back into Winders since suSE installed on my machines. Don't miss it one bit.

    Say what you will, but these are 2 sweet distros tailor-made to get Windblows users into the Linux community. They set up and run with no hassles, and they'll do everything that Windblows users are accustomed to doing, by default. And they do it faster and more stably, at that.

    I appreciate the knowledge of the Linux community, and my hat's off to you, but elitism to the extreme won't spread Linux any faster, if at all.

    Take a minute and help a Windows user see the light. The OS you save may be yours.

    Penguin Power! Flippers Up!

    1. Re:Now wait just one minute by spee · · Score: 1

      good that i'm a geek ~~

      --
      "it's easy to be smart. just think at something stupid to say and then don't say it"
  51. [OT] Your site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you aware that there is a (kickass) Scheme system named Gambit and the last release is version 3? Just in case you didn't know...

  52. It's an excellent start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've just described the uses of a geat majority of computer owners in the US.

    The major distros will surf, email, write docs, burn CDs, most of the mundane stuff, as well as, or generally better than Windblows.

    That is a great start, and I've waited for a long time to see it get to that point. I love to see Microshaft get a little nervous, especially once people find out the distros are free, and they can get one of their more knowledgeable buddies to burn 'em a copy and show 'em how to install it.

  53. What? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Well, I wouldn't really call cookies *spyware*. If you're really getting 10 exe files installed a week, um, you're doing something really wrong.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  54. isn't that something like by santakrooz · · Score: 1

    iTunes for music haters?

    1. Re:isn't that something like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to have something against music to want to listen to it in iTunes (under Windows that is).

  55. what if...... by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    Ever notice how hard it can be to read through a "man" page? What if we also had a "dumbed down" version of a man page available for newbies? eMan (easy man) or something like that.

    --

    1. Re:what if...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eMan (easy man) or something like that.

      Proper name for them would be woman.

    2. Re:what if...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean the woman page?

  56. Open Content by Michael+JasonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only the book was published under an open licence then I could modify it to suit my Fedora Core 2/GNOME using mum, and others could modify it to suit there Mandrake 10/KDE using moms. The author would get the benefits of others keeping the content up to date, and off the shelf sales (assuming the source was released under a non-commercial licence). The rest of the community would benefit from a book that would better suit our needs.

  57. if it's new... by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. then the vendor should do it as a courtesy before it leaves the store. In fact, they should be updating those machines as they sit around waiting to be sold.

    Patches should be treated like a "recall", in fact, IMO, people would take them more seriously if they WERE recalls. People understand a "recall".

    Of course, ignore all that, most people won't do quat until after it's hosed... what was I thinking...

    1. Re:if it's new... by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Calling it a recall is an excellent idea. Convincing MS and stores to handle things that way is something else entirely. Anything that cuts into margin just ain't going to happen.

    2. Re:if it's new... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Calling it a recall is an excellent idea. Convincing MS and stores to handle things that way is something else entirely. Anything that cuts into margin just ain't going to happen.

      I think it could, if the alternative is pissed off cutomers who insist on returning "Internet ready" PCs becasue they self-destruct the first time they try to use them. Geeks look for the cheapest and best hardware, put it together and install their own software. Non-geeks buy the whole package from a retailer, and pay extra for the privilege of not having to worry about setting it up. There is nothing wrong with this attitude, but the retailers have to make sure that what they sell actually does what they claim or imply it will do.

      Of course, the best solution for a non-geek is a Macintosh. Costs more up front but considering what people are willing to spend for extras on, say, a car, it's pocket change for a quantum leap in reliability.

    3. Re:if it's new... by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a mac classic guy for years and years from that reason exactly. I bought a machine, it all worked, it was easy to use, never got hosed or owned or anything. If I got a peripheral, I plugged it in and it worked.

      I remember sitting around with my roomate back in the day trying to upgrade his modem on a 486 running 3.11. Nightmare, something as simple as that. You would think unscrewing one card and screwing in another and applying the driver from a disk would "just work". Nope. Both of us struggled for days on it off and on, we took it to the local neighborhood ubergeek, HE couldn't do it. A normal big bucks for the time off the shelf at the computar store card modem. Around the same time I got a new one for my mac, plugged it in, selected it from the list of modems, it worked.

      Anyway, I switched from macs when apple stopped development on classic and went to a unixy thing that wouldn't run on my hardware, and the combination of the two just got even more expensive, I got priced right out of macs. I had JUST bought a semi new PB1400 and OSX wouldn't run on it, couldn't upgrade past 64 megs RAM and the dang thing USED was expensive. Nuts. I'm screwed then. I'm looking around, had heard of "linux". So I just got some old pc junkers, fixed them up, then got linux discs. It wasn't that hard, I got it up and running and on the intarweb. Seems to work OK, albeit not even close to as easy as classic always was to my way of thinking. It's still not, but "easy enough" now for most normal things I use a computer for. AFTER that initial foray into linux I understood the whole FOSS idea, which I now agree with and support. Windows has never held any sort of fascination for me, I went way too long with no virus du juor or having to set IRQs or needing a firewall or sacraficing chickens or anything to be content with putting up with that kludgy and insecure mess I saw all my friends always struggling with. Irony was they would call my mac a "toy" because it just sat there and worked, as they always were trying to barely keep their machines on the net or keep them from crashing. I thought it was hilarious, but hey, people root for their home team even if they haven't made it to the finals in 50 years or something,mmust be human nature. I think a lot of the "sticking with windows" that has occurred in our society is that humans won't admit they made a mistake when it comes to buying something, especially when the product they buy has no warranty or recall provisions to it. They got stuck with a lemon, and rather than admitting it was a lemon, and entirre lemon fixit it industry grew up around the concept of lemon="good". And this REALLY applies to giant businesses where some powerful VP in charge of buying the expensive stuff gets hosed with 10,000 lemons. he gets to skate on that decision because his buds at the country club, the other VPs, bought the same lemons, so a long time ago they decided to ignore the fact they bought lemons so all of them wouldn't get fired. Well, that and I can't prove it but I bet there's been billions of dollars in kickbacks over the years too that went to the VPs in charge of buying stuff. It exists in every other business, so I doubt it doesn't exist in the expensive paid for software industry.

  58. Of laptops and winmodems by thinkninja · · Score: 1

    I think Linux desktop support is pretty much there/em. Non-geeks can plop an ISO in, run through the graphical installer, and come out with a desktop system where everything pretty much works. Yeah, GNOME/KDE will look hugely different to XP but then the XP interface was itself quite a departure from the previous versions of Windows. It's just a case of adapting to a new desktop environment.

    However, most of my non-geeky friends have laptops and things don't always just work here, AFAIK.

    Is there an installer that has especially good laptop support? I would love to get them to switch away from Windows but I don't want to a) install it for them and, subsequently, b) become their tech support bitch.

    At the moment all they do is natter about pop-unders when using Firefox (I suspect they're actually IE windows launched from resident spyware; yes, I tell them to run AdAware, trendmicro, etc.) or other Windows 'fun' like worms or viruses. All I can do is stare at them blankly.

    If they could start using Linux on their own, without too much handholding, I'd have a lot less staring to do...

    --
    "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
    1. Re:Of laptops and winmodems by cahms26 · · Score: 1

      I have had great success running Debian on my laptop (Dell Inspiron 1100). The install process let me tasksel a bunch of laptop specific stuff which was nice since I didn't know what half of them were before that. The sarge installer has reached the test candidate stage and I've been very happy with it since beta 4. Though I'd suggest installing testing for any newbie. Also, this webpage was so remarkably helpful I archived it in my own doc collection.

    2. Re:Of laptops and winmodems by thinkninja · · Score: 1

      I'm tempted to try the new d-i but I don't have any cdrs. I guess I could ask him to give me one...

      Failing that, I have a Woody dvd but...well, I don't know what networking hardware he has so updating may be a PITA.

      Actually, whether or not I install Debian for him at all is contingent upon support for his modem. He's still on dial-up, you see :/ The main point of putting Debian on there was so he didn't get 0wnz3rd checking email and browsing the web. If he can't get online, for him there's really little incentive to switch.

      His girlfriend (whose laptop it nominally is, although he uses it the most it seems to me) insists that I reinstall OfficeXP because of Word. I'm pretty sure that she'd get used to OO.org in time, though. And eventually they could be weened of Windows altogether...

      Anyway, I'll have to wait and see on Linux support for their winmodem. I doubt they'd be willing to pay for a Linuxant license and I know that they wouldn't want to buy a hardware modem because of the cost and the fact that it's not integrated into the laptop. But, if I can get the modem working for free, then I'm sure they'll be happy converts.

      </rant>

      --
      "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
    3. Re:Of laptops and winmodems by cahms26 · · Score: 1

      One good way to test the modem thing is to use a live CD distro of debian. Knoppix would be a good call.

      In trying to convert my parents, I weened them off of software first. Since firefox, thunderbird and OO.org run on windows as well I started there. Now they are ready for a debian install as they are used to using those three packages and mainly what they do on the comp is that stuff. Only questions left is there MP3 player and digicam. I plan on using Knoppix to test that angle.

      I should also note that in my current job I've gotten firefox and thunderbird accepted as the department standard browser/email client. OO.org is still in conversations. It's just too bad I won't be here to complete the cycle and get them on debian. Oh well, onto bigger and better things.

  59. Really, it's not there. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Um, what are you talking about? Outlook Express has a spell checker.

    Not with Windows 2000 Pro. I know because that's what the last company I worked for gave me. I had to spell check in Open Office until I figured out how to make Mozilla mail work with their exchange server. I can't vouch for XP, but I suspect that you have to buy Office to get a spell checker there too. Don't blame me for that company, like most, thinking that XP is not what they want on their desktops. That's what I had and that's what most people get.

    In any case, not having to look for a spell checker won't make up for all of the other things Outlook Express lacks, much less all of the other 8 things that make me love Linux on the desktop. Modern Linux distributions are easier to install and use than Windows and most commercial software.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Really, it's not there. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      [i]I can't vouch for XP, but I suspect that you have to buy Office to get a spell checker there too.[/i] No, I have a spell checker on my OE, and I'm using WinXP. As far as I know there's always been a spell checker on OE, there is on the Win98 machines I play around with at work. If it didn't come with the version of OE on Win2000, updating to IE/OE6 would probably add it.

  60. Linux for Non-Geeks? by areve · · Score: 1

    What kind of geek reads a Linux book anyway? $man man

  61. give granma a blowjob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blowjob is the best distribution of linux ever

  62. the biggest problem is the EULA by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EULAs are the debble. Here you got fabulously successful companies who by common sense observation SELL software but in legalese they uh loan it to you or something in exchange for you paying for the box it comes in or something. It's nuts. They insist on every possible legal protection and every possible penny in profit, yet NO LAWS apply to the actual product. No warranty, no recourse, no nuthin. It's nuts. I still fail to see why there hasdn't been a massive joe user backlash with a BIG class action suit. forget bundling and browser inclusions and all that jazz, a class action suit over useability for purpose, a warranty. If someone sells a product call it selling, this "license to use but not own" stuff is the ripoff scam going on.

    with free software, I got no beefs, I know up front what the cost is-free-and that I might need to tweak, or get hosed with some aspect of it. I don't expect a warranty of any kind, and am pleasantly surprised that the developers keep working and fixing it. To me it's "so what" on any warranty with free software so I don't mind a EULA there. It's worth "free" to me or minimal cost on a data transfer medium. But to charge what entities like MS charge, SERIOUS folding money, get entire companies sucked in, millions of home users, then they have no warranty at all? Nuts. Software been around decades now, time to take the training wheels off and have our legal systen and society treat it like any other product if they insist on treating it like a product when it comes to money.

  63. All cookies by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    Oh, they are all cookies, I don't think I've had an exe /installed/ on my PC, whether virus or spyware, in two years, whether I've been using Moz or IE.

  64. Sounds familiar! by embill · · Score: 1

    I haven't read this book, however, the concept sounds very similar to Marcel Gagne's book Move to Linux: Kiss the Blue Screen of Death Goodbye. I wonder if Mr. Grant read this book before he "decided to write up a set of instructions on his own"?

  65. _Intro to Linux_ is under the GFDL. by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    > If only the book was published under an open licence then I could modify it

    There's always the Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide book. It's published under the GNU Free Documentation License. Have fun!

  66. lots and lots of sharp edges. by twitter · · Score: 1
    My Win2k box stays on all week, only being shut down on the weekends.

    That's better than I got following most of the above advice. My box sat behind a firewall. I used Mozilla for mail and web. I never fooled with media junk, especially windows media player, so if it was not on there I lived without. I got GIMP for the few times I wanted to edit an image. I lived with the single screen and desktop. After four months or so, the damn thing had trouble staying up all day.

    All of the above was tedious work I don't have to go through with any modern Linux distribution. For all of my trouble, it was not enough. I consider install time and performance issues very "sharp corners." Why go through all of that so that they might be able to keep a box up for a week when they could get all the same features and better performance in 30 minutes with a Mepis CD?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:lots and lots of sharp edges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD

  67. OK, I give up, I'll go M$ today! by twitter · · Score: 1
    As far as I know there's always been a spell checker on OE, there is on the Win98 machines I play around with at work. If it didn't come with the version of OE on Win2000, updating to IE/OE6 would probably add it.

    Being able to get a spell checker by upgrading both IE and OE for free (soul sucking EULAs are free, right?) has convinced me that I need to run out and buy Windows XP for all six of my computers. I'll have to buy Microsoft Office for at least one of them and Adobe Acrobat Writer so I can send well formated pdf by spell checked email. I'll also have to learn to use Microsoft's firewall and how to make it work on a 486. I'll probably have to also buy some remote desktop software to replace ssh with X forwarding, so that I don't have to buy five new monitors or a switchbox. I'll also want a fancy video card with multiple desktop software. See, Microsoft had the solution for me all along. All I needed was another $2,000 or so and lots of time to fight viruses. Why on earth have I been sitting here relaxing with machines that just work?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:OK, I give up, I'll go M$ today! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Being able to get a spell checker by upgrading both IE and OE for free (soul sucking EULAs are free, right?) has convinced me that I need to run out and buy Windows XP for all six of my computers.

      Really, your reactionary post makes no sense. IE/OE6 is a free upgrade, as you said. And can be installed on even Win98 (maybe 95, too). I don't know why you keep getting and extra point added to your post score. So far, all you've stated is that Microsoft's free email client does not have a spell checker, which isn't true.

      I'm not trying to defend OE as a great email client. I use Firefox and Thunderbird for my internet apps.

      I'll also have to learn to use Microsoft's firewall and how to make it work on a 486.

      Is setting up a firewall on Linux as easy as checking a single checkbox? You comments are becoming more ironic.

    2. Re:OK, I give up, I'll go M$ today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical psycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

      I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

      If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

      To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. I mean, this is an article about email disclaimers, right? The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx. WTF?

      Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

      More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own.

      More? Bad spelling in astounding conspiracy theories, more offtopic FUD and uninformed "I'm right, look at me" rants, promptly proven wrong. Worse even, twitter wants to be RMS, apparently (that first one is a winner). I mean, really. You think?

      FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD, offtopic FUD

  68. No! No! No! by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

    > Linux community definitely needs more books like that

    No, we don't. We need manuals that we can legally redistribute and modify (including translations and updates). So I recommend Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide for newbies instead.

  69. will it work on my mom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she never tried linux but is very familiar with VMS on the Vax

  70. yes, as easy as it gets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    DIE/DOE6 is a free upgrade, as you said. And can be installed on even Win98 (maybe 95, too).

    I own one copy of Windoze 98. To move the rest of my computers would cost big bucks and leave me with considerably less reliability, function and value.

    I don't know why you keep getting and extra point added to your post score.

    I'm an old fart with excellent karma, gained by wasting many hours and submitting many stories. You could say it's earned, mostly by sharing useful information, like what follows.

    Is setting up a firewall on Linux as easy as checking a single checkbox?

    Guarddog. OK, you have to click more than one button, but a firewall with one button might not work so well. Smoothwall is as easy to configure as any WAP. If you don't like that, you can copy an ipchains script like Ian Hall-Beyer wrote.

    1. Re:yes, as easy as it gets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

      I mean,

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Fuckin' aye, twit! You're really getting there!!

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  71. Mod this UP please by Burz · · Score: 1

    These are quite valid points. The only thing I would add is that Linux distros have made significant strides in usability.