Slashdot Mirror
DNS Inventor Predicts Future of the Internet
afra242 writes "BBC News has an interesting article which discusses what Dr Paul Mockapetris, the creator of DNS, thinks about what the Internet will be in the near future. He states that currently, we are in the Bronze Age of the Internet and phones will be phased out completely, to be replaced by web addresses."
If this is the bronze age of the Intarweb, Slashdotters represent the Beaker People.
The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
Now, as head scientist and chairman of Nominum, a DNS management company, he has been reflecting on how the net has grown up.
The father of DNS and a scientist working at a DNS management company believes that everything will be controlled by a DNS-like system, absolutely unbelievable!
We have these things called bookmarks... People rarely remember web-addresses as it is. I know that entirely too many people believe their entire "Internet" is their homepage (while working for ATTBI during the @Home changeover I *personally* received several calls from concerned people that their Internet was gone and replaced by this "ATT BY" thing as their homepage had changed from home.excite.com to www.attbi.com). I would venture to say that most people get their information from a handful of sites and don't bother to remember much other than google.com or yahoo.com. I know that I get most of my information from a handful of remembered sites and I consider myself a bit more Internet savvy than the average user.
"It is quite possible that phone numbers will have disappeared and people will just use menus off their phone. I don't think there is particular value in having them."
He theorizes something that already exists! So instead of bookmarks for phone numbers we have these things called address books. You look up someone's name in there and you click on it. It dials. Absolutely brilliant. Thanks for showing us the way!
He's no longer a visionary. He's just pretending to be one. What he did for us changed the Internet from the start. This article on the other hand means nothing as it already exists in popular form.
... catch you dialing up www.talkwithhotbabes.com - only $4.95 per minute!
currently, we are in the Bronze Age of the Internet and phones will be phased out completely, to be replaced by web addresses
And web addresses will be replaced by? What after IPv6?
phones will be phased out completely, to be replaced by web addresses
That might seem a little overly ambitious, but phone service itself for sure will probably go to something all digital. I use Vonage right now and would never switch back. POTS is a last great holdout on the analog to digital conversion.
Of course there are still a good many other poor countries who have such a dated infrastructure that will insure that POTS sticks around a while.
Prediction 1: He wants web addresses to replace phone numbers.
Isn't this pretty much already happening now? With the advent of cell phones and even home phones that allow phone book storage, this already happens. There are people that don't even remember their HOME phone number because they always pull it from the menu on their cell phone, or use voice-activated dialing.
I'm not so sure I follow. Google has become so successful because of their search technology. With billions of webpages and websites, and probably even more billions of phone numbers, how is that going to help? It's still tough to find web addresses with easy to remember names these days. Atleast with Google it makes it much easier.
Prediction 2: Access for all, Security
Wasn't this already introduced a couple years ago? Since the advent of broadband, it has been the goal of changinging everything over to that and giving access to all. However, I think it's something that is going to happen a lot sooner than we think, thanks in part to wi-fi. Wi-fi is becoming increasingly popular with everyone these days from hotels, cafes, even in parks. Thankfully, he did point out that security needs to be tightened up before a lot of this goes mainstream.
Correct... This is more than likely going to be the next big explosion on the net (behind searching of course). But I just wish it would actually happen in the right order. Get the security practices down, then introduce access for all, but make sure they can understand it first.
Hmmm.
But seriously, isn't it already that way? I only know two phone numbers: my cellphone and my normal phone. If I want to call someone I just look up their name in my "phonebook" on my cell or phone and I click "call". So in some way we already have the thing he talks about. You could consider the phonebook function in modern phones as an equivalent to a local "hosts" file.
Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
I understand the thought of dumping phone number and mapping them names in the future. I just don't think DNS or DNS like directory is what is needed.
As of right now, I just share my contact list between my phone and my pda. I think the future is convergence. I'm waiting for the ideas to make my life simpler now.
-- Bryan
I think Vint Cerf had a similar article to this a few months back, which dealt with the difference between computing now and in the future. His main point was similar in that all communication will be IP based and that IPv6 will accomodate for those spaces. Another interesting point was that he stated that computers would no longer rely on human to computer interaction, but more computer to computer reaction.
Personally, I think companies are already doing similar things like Apple's XGRID.
GroupShares Inc. - A Free and Interactive Stock Market Community
-------
artlu.net
The internet will replace your telephone, television, electricity, water, gas, and sewer. Rather, everything will come and go to and from your house through a single "big pipe". It will be a marvelous future...
Unknown host pong.
I'm tired of having to remember so many damned numbers.
"Searching and finding people are certainly the two areas that still need to develop further, according to Dr Mockapetris, and replacing numbers with web addresses will help that, he says."
Everybody has a little key-holder with a fingerprint reader. Just let somebody push his finger to add him to your contacts. Furter information about the person is stored online.
If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
Lets think about this. This is the guy that saw the Internet (or what became the Internet) and decided that the one thing this wonderful new decentralized network needed was a highly centralized system for mapping host names to IP addresses - thus eventually creating all the problems we are now experiencing with ICANN?
And we should respect his opinion why?
..how everyone who ever had a hand in making the coffee that was drunk by the person who thought about submitting the RFC for anything vaguely related to the internet's inception seems to be lauded as some sort of oracle, all-knowing of all-things internet.
But this bloke does have some ideas. And did invent DNS. So I guess that makes it ok.
I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you
Alot of the stuff you see on Sci-Fi usually end up influencing us in one way or another, when he said eliminating phones I think he meant more of regular phones you see today. either way, I wouldn't mind calling someone like this: votp://us.florida.1974.:12:12/crypticspawn
I believe in the distant future, humans will be able to use the internet to order pizza and HAVE IT DELIVERED to their homes. I know this may seem hard to believe, but the children of the future will never have to suffer a world without pizza and the terror of growing your own tomatoes or the horror of kneading dough.
Phony McRingRing: I'm here to explain why the convenience of one area code in Man's Voice: -Your Town- has been replaced by the convenience of two area codes! ... Scientists have discovered that even monkeys can memorize 10 numbers. Are you stupider than a monkey?
Wiggum: How big of a monkey?
"There is no spoon." - The Matrix
From the article:
Although advanced countries are at the point where most people have net access in one form or another, much still needs to be done so that every man, woman and child on the planet has it all of the time, he says.
One of the things that struck me about the media coverage about the war on Afghanistan is just how poor and primitive the majority of the people on the planet have it. There are arguably about 1-2 billion people in the G8 countries. How many other countries have running water? Indoor plumbing? Electricity? Look at the goat farmers in the middle east. Do you really think that everyone is going to have web access anytime soon?
The idea that the entire world has our standard of living is simply false.
Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
VoIP anybody? Seriously, I would LOVE it if my broadband ISP was more like my phone company. for starters, I wouldn't have to pay an extra $25 just so I can get a friggin static IP. I mean, dynamic IP addys would disappear. ("hey, Jim, what's your phone number today?" "143.225.33.205 ... as long as my phone doesn't reboot.")
Lagito ergo expectabo
Some cultures in the world are still in the Bronze Age -- period. What good is ubiquitous Internet connectivity to a people that are comparatively primitive?
Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
Paper, snail mail, hiking boots and such will always exist as needed elements of human life. Thesse predictions are not only short sighted of how it deepens the gap between the have and have nots, but the driving forces in evolution of computer technology are Military and Gaming IMHO. The driving force in real world implementation is probably the online porn industry. And as always the prime force against most of what Dr. Mockapetris states is privacy concerns. Otherwise projects like this April Fools note would already be underway. Note that my information is just as scientific as his predictions :)
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
uhm, pardon me here, but since when was building a *quality* website easy?
these same people that can't figure out how to operate a built-in phone book on thier nokia now need something.name? i think not
If you have to call the goatse.cx guy, for goodness sake don't be looking at your cell phone screen when he answers.
There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
This is a step in the direction that I have been asserting (much to the chagrin of those who have to listen to my nerd-like ramblings) to all my friends and co-workers: "Soon, we will all be assigned IP addresses at birth". Now that, my friends, IS the future!
Sig? - yeah, whatever.
> Surely you mean this kind of Beaker person?
Yes that was part of the double entendre. But you see, if you read the Wikipedia page about the Beaker people, you'll see that Slashdotters really are much like them, in contrast to other groups around at the time.
The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
" and phones will be phased out completely, to be replaced by web addresses."
Kinda funny that this article came up when it did. Just a couple of days ago I was looking for a cheap PocketPC/Palm that had built in wireless so I could use it for messaging at home and at work. I have fond hopes that it'll do voice chat one day.
To date, I haven't exactly phased out my phone. On the other hand, I rarely use it instead of ICQ or email to chat with my friends.
"Derp de derp."
gotta be.
"In the future, the Internet will be twice as fast, ten thousand times larger, and so expensive only the five richest kings in Europe will own it!"
I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
The problem is the form factor of the cell phone. Cell phones typically have a numeric keypad to keep the size reasonable. The easiest way to input a phone number is to enter numbers.
The biggest current trend is that everyone is switching to wireless phones. Most people don't want to carry around a phone large enough to contain a keyboard. Voice recognition works well only for words that are commonly used. For weird IP addresses, you would have to say each letter one at a time.
Imagine you meet somebody. You want to store his/her phone number your phone book on your cell phone. Which is easier? Typing 820-833-5214 or typing a 16 letter word into your 10 button keypad?
Great. Any the next time I lose power at my house, how will I call the power company? Or 911?
(S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))
So, we'll replace all this with web addresses so that if a big DNS host goes down like it did last week, then nothing will work.
GREAT!!
Maybe he is just predicting the future he wants, so that people will remember his name without having to say " - the inventor of DNS"
Anyone remember when they used words for the first couple letters of a given phone number?
So going to web addresses from digit-based phone numbers would actually have a retro flair to it, after a fashion...
I only R part of TFA, but I noticed this quote immediately. This doesn't seem like much of an insight to me. Of course we'll look back on it and laugh, isn't that how it always goes? We used to drive covered wagons pulled by horses on dirt roads. It's quaint now, but back then they were at the edge of technology. All (er... most) of us here know that the network infrastructure is weak and likely won't carry us much further in its existing state, but rest assured, we'll get there. One step at a time, that's the way it's always been.
Wasn't there a comercial several years ago where a hot chick passes a guy at a party a piece of paper with her e-mail address on it? Does anyone else remember that?
You know, after reading this something is pretty clear to me. I hate technology, in its current state.
...
When I'm in a face to face conversation, and one of my buddies 'Jim' says "just drop me an email", I cringe. Let's see... I've got only one email address listed under 'Jim' in my handheld's address book. Was that his home email, or his work email, or his personal-but-I-can-read-this-at-work email? Damn, I don't remember, and my handheld's software didn't provide space to make such a note.
Okay, I'll give him a call and ask... no, that's his home number.. where is his cell phone number? Crap, doesn't matter... no cell phone signal. Fine, I'll just wait until I get home...
Okay, my home address book has what I need... I send off that email. Now I wait two days for him to reply. With three email addresses, you can't expect 'Jim' to check them all constantly, right?
So two days later, 'Jim' replies... but I didn't see the message. I accidentally deleted it, instead of an advertisement for Cia.lis that was one line down.
I'll call 'Jim', and see why he hasn't written me back. Hmm, his phone service tells me that 'all circuits are currently occupied'. I'm sorry, but what the hell is that supposed to mean?
Oh, ok now his phone is ringing... hmm, poor connection, I can barely understand him. Jim says he replied to me... hmmm...
Oh, there it is, in my deleted messages folder. Ahh, but my email server stripped off the attachment, fearing that zip file of fake Olsen twin porn he sent me was a virus.
I give up.
As self-serving as it might seem (the creator of DNS, who works for a DNS company, is pitching DNS as a cure-all solution), maybe he has the right idea. Let's face it, the DNS system works. And it works well enough that there is just one of them in use. You don't hear "oh, you can't get to my website, because you are using the wrong DNS system."
A single, elegant system for uniquely identifying a human being, and then routing all communications to them (phone calls, emails, instant messages), independant of the devices being used to communicate, would be great. I, for one, would welcome that.
Obviously, though, the physical and socal infrastructure is not there yet (spotty cell phone coverage, unsolicited calls and emails, unproductive business competition). We've got a long way to go.
Something like this?
isn't part of the people that use technology already on route to working without phones, but using the internet instead to stay in contact?
this might be becouse all my fellow students are IT students to, but when we arent face to face, we use instant messengers allot, where other people would use phones.
and most of us have only 1 or 2 e-mail adresses that they regulary check (and a few extra for the spam), but when we send a message, we know that we will either have a repply within minutes (when using IM) or within a day or 2 (when using mail).
with phones, the other person needs to be close to that phone to get a responce... with IM, you can send a message now and read the repply later...
All indicators show that the human race is selectively breeding itself for stupidity.
I predict that the social security number will be replaced by an IPv6 address. When you are born, this address will be how you are identified and located. Eventually, all the people in the world will be given an IPv6 address when they are born
How else will big brother or the anti-christ keep track of you. Is there a correlation between the number of the beast (666) and IPv6? There will be eventually.
While Dr. Mockapetris believes that de-numberizing the way we remember/contact people is the way of the future, I believe this does nothing to further help the much needed cause of finding people, places, things. THAT, I believe, is the way of the future, and "doing away with phone numbers" simply does not help that.
"It is quite possible that phone numbers will have disappeared and people will just use menus off their phone. I don't think there is particular value in having them."
Did he forget what his DNS is even based on? no matter how many layers of indirection he places on top of the current system, you can't replace the fact that people need to be identified uniquely in one way or another. If he believes a person can be remembered more easily by myphone@whatever.com (or whatever other convention he uses other than phone numbers) he still misses the point on how we obtain these names/numbers in the first place.
When reading this article, i've tried to forget the fact that he has his own DNS management company now, yet his inisistence on building an "alternative" phone-numbering infrastructure and using his clout of being "the father of DNS" only hints that he really has no new "vision" of the future and is trying to profit on whatever soon-to-be-outdated technology he happened to invent.
DNS certainly helped the internet grow enourmously.. but if you think about it now, its really not needed as much any more other than advertising.
Alternative forms of gathering your bookmarks/phone contacts/unknowns is the future.
They claimed that they would be MORE IMPORTANT than DNS, and that getting the right "RealName" was key to having a successful website. They kept coming around to my employer at the time (a Big Media company) trying to convince them to pay top $$$ for RealName keywords before "someone else" did.
Thankfully, they went out of business, and DNS is still here!
Best Buy can have you arrested
To Quote many of my close personal friends when using my telephone, "HI, I would have called sooner but he's got a rotary phone."
Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
I buy a new phone. I power it up and it asks for some kind of personal ID info. This might be SSN in the US, driver license number, or a domain name (phone3.bigmeat.com). With all your phones set to that domain name, your home server (or ISP) will forward to whichever phone detects your on-body bluetooth emitter (or RFID tad). All a person has to do, to add someone to their address book is enter an email name and then press the talk button to call them, as opposed to the text button, to email them. The phone has some kind of MAC address but unless you're a network admin, you'll never know it.
I drank what? -- Socrates
Ninnle Linux: The Internet is Here!
> He states that currently, we are in the Bronze Age of the Internet
We are? Well, *somebody* needs to pony up 1000 food and 800 gold to get us into the Iron Age. I wanna build a Wonder, here!
Chris Mattern
I don't like the idea of my ISP fucking up a router, or DNS, and I can't make/recieve any phone calls.
Better yet, how about Al Q toasting a couple key locations and taking out all internet service/phone service for the whole country? We wouldn't be able to call 911, *OR* get any pr0n.
boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
Slashdot is every bad article written during the .com boom. "I think the future is convergence". THIS is +5 interesting??? There isn't a negative number small enough to express how redundant this comment is.
Are you in need of laxatives or are you a Pakled?
I loved that episode.
IPv6 does much more than just give addresses to things. It does QoS, multicasting, anycasting, inter-network broadcasting, and any number of cool things that allow routers to be much smarter.
To think that we won't want routers to be any smarter than IPv6 lets them is maybe a bit short-sighted. To suggest that IPv6 is just about the address space is missing the big picture, I think.
It hurts your job advancement possibilities when you suddenly laugh out loud whilst sitting at your workstation.
(So does browsing Slashdot for that matter...)
If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
It's more user friendly to have phone number type addressing for all this human interface stuff on the net instead of trying to subnet mask your telephone.
It's called Directory Assistance.
We already have a lot of younger people who (from what I have read anyway) can't read an analog clock or write cursive easily. Digital clocks and representations are the norm, along with only reading text and typing more than writing. I also think-can't prove it but think-that calculators are making the ability to do simple math with pencil and paper a lost art as well in the general population.
I can remember when the teachers made us turn in our slide rules before tests.
Man, I wish I still had mine, along with the leather holster. It was sort of the geek badge around school, even moreso than a pocket protector (had one of those, too). You had to have a mechanical pencil for drafting, a black warrior #2 for math and taking notes, and a black ink pen for taking tests (so you couldn't change your answer). You could use blue for taking notes if you wanted to. Written papers had to be either legible cursive, or typed, double spaced, with correct punctuation and paragraphing. Form/appearance and content were equally graded, because it was explained this was important later on in the academic and business world.
Good and bad. I wonder what bits of technology I would give up to have a simpler and politer society. Back then we didn't have school massacres, the kids weren't forced drugged (or voluntarily drugged), we didn't have JBT "officers" roaming the halls, no one cared if you carried a gun to school and put it in your locker for target practice or hunting after school, and you just didn't see teachers scared like they apparently are now. Any "acting up" in class got swift retribution, it didn't de-evolve into focus group studies and child protective services seizing the kids or any of that nonsense, and the parents went along with it, granting parental like priveleges to the teachers as a default while the kids were in school. You acted decent and within some normal bounds of politness and respect, or ya got it, usually a sneaker wrapped with tape or a paddle. I think I got it three times total my entire grade school career, near as I can recall, most likely deserved I might add.
Nowadays the kid acting up would be drugged with some sort of speed and downers mixed most likely,because he obviously must be suffering from a plethora of long named psychological "conditions", then have a life-long record, the teacher would get suspended and incarcerated as a terrorist, and the kid might be taken from his parents and put in some pervo scam foster care money mill.
Times change.
What would I swap??--hmm, big screen sensurround plasma TVs for a start, to get that innocence back.
Celebrating DNS's 21st birthday
DNS is finally old enough to drink (in Oregon at least)! How do you celebrate a name server's birthday? Take it out to see ip addresses strip?
God damn I'm funny.
Movie News - "Entertainment news, bitch!"
When I read the title of the submission, I thought that there might be some unique incite into the future of the internet, but this article was exremely lacking. The only real prediction that he makes is that all voice calls will be routed over the internet. I guess that is an easy prediction with all of the working in VOIP. However, I was hoping he would have something more interesting to say, not simply just saying that there is a lot more room for innovation.
SIGFAULT
the future of the web by inventor of dns? NO thank you!
after email, the worst protocol in the world. I'd rather have no future.
If anyone is waiting for big business to come up with an end-all solution like this, don't hold your breath.
What will happen is this: some large, well-funded organization (let's say a large university, as it'd be fairly likely) will say "Screw it, we're going to try something new..."
They'll come up with a completely new system, free of dependancy on existing infrastructure. Fast ethernet, secure email, multiple-medium instant messaging, land-line and roaming telephony.
Sure, they'd need some sort of gateway to communicate with people outside the system... but if it's enough of a hassle, and communicating within the system is easy, it just 'proves' the point, all the more.
I'll also bet that the attempt won't work. It'll fail miserably. Costs will be too high, students will be loathe to adopt unfamiliar technologies, or someone will demand some sort of backwards compatibility that will kill the idea.
But someone else will sit back and watch, and learn from the mistakes. They will then impliment such a system, stealing the pros from the first experiment, and losing the cons. This second system will be really nice, and will win people over.
Just wait... it'll happen...
Does it means more $$$ for companies like VeriSign? I don't quite like them anyway.
I don't remember peoples phone #'s because I only have a cell phone and it has menus with the names of the people I want to call. Unless of course I use voice activated dialing. //Not impressed.
I don't think DNS is the answer.
The problem with DNS is this: No "fuzzy" matching. DNS does not have Google's ability to spell-check names. SO, yes, DNS is good for making things a little easier to remember, but other technology should be used for things like voice matching, etc.
More pr0n.
More Warez.
More Spam.
Less Lawrence Welk fan websites.
Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
Sort of like national identity or tax numbers; get a URL at birth to last you your life. If only the system would change every few years ...
So, I now do this: I just remember the URLs I always use (or, if they're large (where large generally means anything besides name.{com,org,net} -- local government sites, or stuff in the UK or whatever), I remember what keywords bring that site up first in Google, then hit "I'm Feeling Lucky". As for the reminder function, now I save them in a Yahoo! Notepad note, which is accessible from (more or less) any machine.
As a side note, I never click on the location bar to do this typing; I invariably hit the key combo to bring up the "Go to URL" dialog. This generally confuses almost everyone who sees me do it.
"A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
What happens when we get to the Industrial Age of the Internet? Or the Atomic Age? Or -- wait for it -- the Information Age?
All our heads asplode, that's what happens.
"A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
I don't know about this, but having an algorithmic mapping between phone numbers and IP addresses (prolly IPv6) seems sensible. That way, all the communications technology can converge on a single nomenclature for addressing endpoints. At least this way, DNS becoms the equivalant of a phone directory, put in name to get the IP address/phone number or visa versa.
Come to think about it, the same could be said for street addresses. Probably want to wait for IPv8 or IPv12 or something like that before that made sense though.
Welcome to the net of 1000 lies. Upgrades are scheduled soon that should bring us to the 10,000 lies mark.
[It's a joke... Laugh. And yes, for the record, I was permanently scarred by kids making fun of my name in 2nd grade.]
I was lucky to have Paul Mockapetris as a professor in the early 80's before the widespread use of networks (UUCP was hot stuff at that point in time.)
One of the things I remember most, was his acronym for the OSI model: "All Professors Should Teach Networking Like Paul" so your could remember this. Of course, a lot has changed since then, but I was lucky to get a head start on it all -- thanks Paul!
Another cool thing about this class was that Marshall Rose was a fellow student. He's written a few RFCs since then.
-ch
"There's a sale at Penney's!"
Look at your own address zippy@cs.brandeis.edu. Isn't this a nonsense statement? "zee,eye,pee,pee,why,at,sea,s,dot,bee,our,a,en,de, e,eye,es,dot,e,de,you
I just coincidently wrote this for inclusion on another forum, it fits in with your observations of win some and lose some looking back in time, which I agree with.
"I remember seeing an "impeach earl warren" billboard. I asked my folks about it and they said some kooks put those up. Took me years to really find out what that was all about. And I don't think it was because my folks were bad people, just totally propogandized into it. They eventually got hip too, I know they haven't voted dem or repub for several election cycles now, although I think any of the other choices wehave been presented with over the past few decades aren't that swift either.
Things weren't always all that great though, I distinctly remember when I first learned to read, the city we lived in still had a sign at the main drag entrance that said "no 'N-word's allowed" along with the moose and elks and kiwanis signs.
The US has always had a somewhat decent *theory* of government, but I don't think we ever really had it in practice as designed,never, no matter how far you go back and look. Jefferson wanted to especially address slavery, and got out voted on it for example, completely destroying the concept of individual soverignty and establishing an official governmental and societal precedence for ignoring the words as they were intended in english. It took more than a century to establish women as human beings with any rights. The patenting and copyrighting aspects to our laws were in no manner shape or form supposed to be the abomination we have now. We were never supposed to have corporations running the government or acting outside the US publics interest, yet they have so since day 1. We weren't supposed to have an all powerful executive branch just spewing edicts, yet almost all of them did so,because power easily taken usually is. We have consistently broken our word with treaties. We have consistently interferred in other soverign nations for connected elite business/corporate interests, including about every foreign war we have ever been in, I honestly can't think of an example were we didn't, except for the second war with the british.. We have consistently persecuted religious and racial minorities, all the way to genocidal actions. We have consistently passed new laws every year, without removing any older ones, establishing the principle that government is an open ended growth industry and it is near illegal to make it smaller. We have consistently allowed manipulations of the money supply to skew with normal market functions, usually to the producers detriment and the middlemen & skimmers benefit. We have consistently not provided equal protection under the law between any two states in matters relating to federal law and guaranteed individual born with rights, they let the states slide on that one big time, but then overstepped their bounds on many other issues. We have almost consistently since the civil war tolerated a standing army, and made it patriotic to adhere to that, when it was originally set up that a standing army was abhorrent and would lead to abuse. We established a precedent for the standing army to not only be construed as a supre patriotic subset of the population, but to glorifying following illegal orders from a commander in chief, just because he said so, and monies were taken from the people with an non-excise illegal tax to fund those efforts.
and yada yada yada.
I think we have a collective consciousness of remembering what was good, and glossing over what was bad.
Most humans/nations/tribes/governments/religions you name it, any particular grouping, etc do that, so I think it's safe to say it's just normal human nature and doesn't make us any worse than other peoples-but it doesn't make us much if any better, either. It's a near draw as close as I can call it.
I also don't think it's even possible to have freedom without strife. I don't think it's possible to have an honest government, because you must give away-grant- power to do so, and it will be
I think you fail to understand the kind of shift that will happen when international dialing codes and area codes simply go away. When you can rely on underlying systems like DynDNS married to a directory system that will allow you to plug a SIP phone anywhere, get a DHCP address - register to a directory server - and start taking calls immediately. Or what will happen when cellular providers go IP behind the scenes.
His insight that Domain Naming services tie it all together is quite important. Despite what you think.
You may very well be correct. That is one approach to locating services on the internet: Know the name of the service a priori. Curiously, it is also precisely the approach that Microsoft took with Active Directory.
There are other approaches, however. The world's oldest and largest directory provider, Novell, bet the farm on the Service Location Protocl, or SLP. Sun & IBM are also very prominent in the SLP community [as well as the closely aligned Project Liberty initiative].
Bottom line: There are multiple, competing approaches to the problem of finding resources on the internet. Heck, when you get right down to it, there's nothing wrong with the old Altavista PeopleSearch. Over time, one of these initiatives will win the greatest market share, and all of the survivors will almost certainly become "compatible" to some extent or another. And it may very well be that Microsoft's approach [DynDNS in conjunction with Kerberos] will be the winner. But there's been an awful lot of resistance to Redmond thus far, and their Passport initiative has, to date, been just shy of an utter and complete disaster.
However, there are two enormous stumbling blocks to further adoption of DNS: Classically, it is an unencrypted protocol with no proper sense of authentication whatsoever. If it is to move forward, the industry will have to move towards encrypted, authenticatible versions of it.
The second stumbling block is much more ominous, however: Against what database [i.e. directory] is DNS to be authenticated? Who will hold the master keys to the server-side authentication and who will hold the master keys to the client-side authentication? Once you require authentication, you give up every ounce of your anonymity on the internet. [Obviously Project Liberty suffers from the same fundamental flaw.] Once you lose anonymity, Big Brother knows who you are, where you are, and precisely what you are doing for the remainder of your life on the web.
Now you could argue that the telecomms already have that power over you when it comes to classical POTS, and that a court order [or "warrant"] is required for the telecomms to release your telephone dialing history, but in all truth: How many times have you used classical POTS to post a political tirade anonymously on a web bulletin board? Or download some pr0n, or place an off-shore bet on a sports team, or purchase a nice Mosel riesling from Wine Commune?
A simple solution would be to use the Major System, instead of the lousy encoding on the current phones. This system has been used by memory experts since the 1600's.
Instead of 2 having "ABC" and 3 having "DEF", the phones would have each digit encoded with consanants, and EVERY phone number would be able to be mapped to a memorable phrase.
For instance, if you met Jenny (867-5309) in a New York (212) bar, she could slip you her "number" as "hunting fishkill mishap", and you could remember that (assuming you didn't have 10 beers). In the morning, you could just key in the critical consanants (n-t-n g-sh-k l-m-sh-p) from her phone phrase, and you'd have her number (n-t-n, from hunting = 212, g-sh-k = 867, l-m-sh-p = 5309).
The major system more evenly distributes words over a number space, so that you can remember them better. It's a shame that Ma Bell didn't lay out the phone this way in the first place - we'd all have better memories, and have learned from 400 years of memory techniques.
Talk about illogical, how about basic reading comprehension here. You need all of the above. You need the ability to do math in your head, on paper or blackboard, and with a calculator or program with a computer.
As to lawn mowing, GLAD you brought that up so I can refute your claims. I am a mowing guru. I have some serious leet skills when it comes to mowing and trimming and clearing. If it existed you could say I have a PhD in that discipline. That's basically what I do for a living, and you know what? I have close to a dozen different mowers I use working, some that are worth in the mid 5 figures range and weigh multiple tons and are capable of mowing entire large trees down to ground level, right down to a SCYTHE that runs on strict manpower that I use to trim some very steep and rough areas where about nothing else will work, because you can't get to it with a machine. I use the *right tool for the right job*.
OK man, you got me! Great troll!