Slashdot Mirror


Blinkx and You Won't Miss It

WebfishUK writes "The Guardian is running this story about Blinkx a a kind of "search companion" which aims to bring internet searches in closer contact to what you are working on. Its total search approach (including email attachments, blogs and local files) seems to have some parallels to Googles Gmail engine. Could this be the first real technology threat for Google?"

182 comments

  1. "search companion" ? by ack154 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Maybe it's just me... but "search companion" sounds a lot like "spyware." Let's hope this is not the case with this software ... although, this part kind of worries me:
    Blinkx's planned business model involves getting advertising revenue from contextual adverts, product channels and white labelling, but she emphasises that the search is independent: it is mathematically based and just looks at words and their context. She adds: "It is clean, but users don't know that so we show our advertisements in a different colour".
    I think I'll just stick to Google/Gmail and let them read just my email. I don't need someone also reading all of the data on my PC to serve ads.
    1. Re:"search companion" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, Blinkx has an even worse track record than Google when it comes to protecting My Rights Online. I installed the beta version of their software onto my "dumping ground box," an old Athlon 700 running on a FIC AZ11 motherboard with Windows XP Professional Edition Service Pack 2, Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock, and OpenOffice.org 1.1.2 SFX edition.

      During my usage of the software, I saw numerous pop-under banners being spawned by Internet Explorer, even when I was using Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock! It turns out that Blinkx actually creates a pseudo-proxy server and routes all traffic through it. Even historically secure browsers like Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock were foiled by it.

      After one too many ads triggered from Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock, I re-imaged my dumping ground box. Please boycott Blinkx.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Watchdog and Privacy Advocate
      Not affiliated with Seth Finkelstein, but still hates Michael Sims

    2. Re:"search companion" ? by Horia · · Score: 2, Informative
      On their site it says :

      The blinkx windows client automatically finds web pages, news articles and documents on your machine that are related to the content of your active window.

      Or is it "The blinkx windows client automatically displays ads and questionable links based on spying what you do" ? Haha.

    3. Re:"search companion" ? by Burianski11 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I would like to let them read my email as well... got any invites?

    4. Re:"search companion" ? by SquadBoy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They go for like 3 bucks on ebay. Having said that tmobiletestaccount@yahoo.com

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    5. Re:"search companion" ? by Dissenter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. It's hard to trust anyone out there with, but to this point, Google hasn't done anything that makes me worry about the Gmail ads and knowing that it's just displaying them in the page doesn't wory me like anything that is installed on my machine as a "helpful companion." That pesky "Lycos Sidebar" is supposed to be a search companion too, but that's the most annoying spyware app ever. (Damn users and their Internet Exploder.)

      --

      Dissenter
      "There is no knowledge that is not power."

    6. Re:"search companion" ? by xmorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      exactly.

      Actually, I think any software that has the word "companion", that is not a real person is either spyware, addware or annoyware.

    7. Re:"search companion" ? by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 1
      no, bonzi buddy is the most annoying piece of spyware and adware, it talks and tells you to buy more stuff from bonzi.com

      -Signatures are good for the Soul-

      --
      "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
    8. Re:"search companion" ? by magefile · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize that the guy who runs google-watch hates Google for personal reasons, and has a major conflict of interest? Also, why do you sign your post "Seth Finklestein", then say at the bottom "Not affiliated with [SF]"?

    9. Re:"search companion" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Seth Finklestein," a fictional character, is not affiliated with Seth Finkelstein.

      How much clearer do you need me to make it?

    10. Re:"search companion" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this a troll?

      man... the mods are on crack.

    11. Re:"search companion" ? by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down guys and think before u mod something informative. What is the matter with the mods. This is a troll, try installing it and see. Common Even historically secure browsers like Mozilla Firefox 0.9.2 with Adblock and Flashblock were foiled by it. is laughable. Search companion may later sure be a fertile ground for spyware but right now atleast it is not.

    12. Re:"search companion" ? by Jahf · · Score: 1

      No kidding ... I've been using Gmail for a couple of weeks and until you mentioned it I had forgotten that it even HAD ads.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    13. Re:"search companion" ? by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      I keep forgetting Gmail has ads, I just don't really notice them very often. Unlike Hotmail where all I see is tons of graphics and ads, not to mention the format changing every few months so I have to go looking for which button takes me to the friggin inbox.

  2. Could this be Google's first technology threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No.

    Maybe we should update the old UseNet cliche :

    Imminent Death of Google Predicted : Film at 11

  3. Woohoo!! by scoot241 · · Score: 4, Funny

    An even quicker way to find porn, music, and movies. If this searches IRC channels too, we'll be set for life!

    1. Re:Woohoo!! by Bloodlent · · Score: 1

      This is so cool I'm surprised they didn't say "in Japan"

    2. Re:Woohoo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this searches IRC channels too, we'll be set for life!

      Not life, really, but a remarkable simulation of it.

      / Your star burns! I require frozen treats.

    3. Re:Woohoo!! by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Last time an article on slashdot recommended Vivisimo and I was blown away by how much better than google it was in many ways. So I wouldn't count out another search engine making google obsolete in the future.

    4. Re:Woohoo!! by zors · · Score: 1

      Its pretty good, for some things. For quick searches, i'd go with google, the first results tend to be more on target. For research, i might go with vivisimo instead, because of the clustering function.

    5. Re:Woohoo!! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      If this searches IRC channels too, we'll be set for life!

      Obviously not your life, as you don't have one.

    6. Re:Woohoo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damnit people, click the "reply to this" link!

      Why?

    7. Re:Woohoo!! by Cred · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tried finding porn with this.. "free porn" nor "free porn pictures" gave any really free porn picture sites, galleries.

  4. Since when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..is Google's GMail an engine?

    1. Re:Since when.. by ack154 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well I'm pretty sure they're just referring to the back end of Google searching that powers Gmail. And speaking of my own use, it's one damn quick and easy search engine for email. I have like 500 emails in just one of my "labels" and I can search and fly through them with no problems. It's my "ebay" label, so I look for specific items or that "one thing" that I bought a while ago and forgot to leave feedback or something like that... but it's quick, efficient, and well... it's Google.

    2. Re:Since when.. by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 0, Redundant

      since when is Microsoft Windows an operating system?

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  5. Dashboard clone? by Peter+Winnberg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't this just a clone of Dashboard?

    1. Re:Dashboard clone? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Grr... I was just about to say "no, Dashboard is the other feature; what you want is Spotlight," before I realized you were talking about GNOME's utility.

      Damn namespace violations!

      But yeah, it sounds like Dashboard + advertising to me.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Dashboard clone? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Looks to be very much like it.
      It only seems to work with MS+IE though.
      I was unaware of this dashboard deal... but now I want it.

    3. Re:Dashboard clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like you to provide evidence that supports that "fact" that you have listed in your sig.

    4. Re:Dashboard clone? by merdark · · Score: 1

      Except that dashboard never reached a first release, and doesn't search the web I don't think.

      Why is it people always try to suggest that something copied open source software? I bet 99% of the people on this planet don't know what the gnome dashboard prototype is. I also bet the Blinx people have no clue, given that blinx is an IE based product.

  6. Blinkx website privacy page. by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our Commitment To Your Privacy

    Your privacy is important to us and blinkx makes every endeavor to ensure that all of our products protect your privacy.

    Most importantly, BLINKX NEVER REMOVES, COPIES, FORWARDS, AMENDS OR OTHERWISE MOVES ANY OF YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION from your COMPUTER (INCLUDING YOUR E-MAILS AND DOCUMENTS). YOUR INFORMATION STAYS ON YOUR COMPUTER.

    blinkx works by comparing relevant information to deliver results, but never uses the original documents. The only actual hard information blinkx collects is your e-mail address when you decide to download the blinkx client.

    We use the information you directly provide about yourself purely for this blinkx beta program. We do not share this information with outside parties and for no other commercial matters. When we receive email correspondence, we use return email addresses to reply with the information requested. Such addresses are not shared with outside parties.

    Should you have other questions or concerns about these privacy policies, please send us an email at feedback@blinkx.com
    blinkx's Website

    This policy only addresses our activities from our servers. Other websites (including those that we link to and third party websites or services that we co-brand) may have their own policies, which we do not control, and thus are not addressed by this policy.

    This site recognizes the home server of visitors, but not their e-mail addresses. This site also uses "cookie" technology so that we can better understand how to improve the experience of visiting our website. Also, blinkx tracks the Internet address of the domains from which visitors are coming and uses this data for statistics and analysis on the levels of success of our web programs, but the name of the visitor remains anonymous.

    The names and contact information of persons who request information about blinkx, its subsidiaries, its products and/or its services are added to our data base, so that they may be contacted in the future regarding blinkx's products, services or future opportunities. This contact may occur by e-mail, telephone or mail, as blinkx deems appropriate. We do not sell or rent any information about our visitors, and we have no plans to do so in the future.

    We use industry-standard efforts to safeguard the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information, such as firewalls and secure socket layers where appropriate. However, "perfect security" does not exist on the Internet.

    You acknowledge that acceptance of this privacy policy, as updated from time to time at this location, is a condition to your use of our website and you agree to be bound by all of its terms and conditions.

    If you have any questions regarding our policies please e-mail blinkx's webmaster at feedback@blinkx.com

    blinkx home page

    1. Re:Blinkx website privacy page. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Blinkx website privacy page. by mikeophile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After reading this...

      blinkx works by comparing relevant information to deliver results, but never uses the original documents. The only actual hard information blinkx collects is your e-mail address when you decide to download the blinkx client.

      And then this...

      This site recognizes the home server of visitors, but not their e-mail addresses. This site also uses "cookie" technology so that we can better understand how to improve the experience of visiting our website. Also, blinkx tracks the Internet address of the domains from which visitors are coming and uses this data for statistics and analysis on the levels of success of our web programs, but the name of the visitor remains anonymous.

      They are pretty much saying that they *only* collect your email address and all of your web browsing data, but don't worry since they don't have your "name".

    3. Re:Blinkx website privacy page. by kantai · · Score: 1

      No, it says it collects referral information, most websites do.

    4. Re:Blinkx website privacy page. by demaria · · Score: 4, Informative

      All they're saying is that they record the Referrer information from an HTTP header. That doesn't say they collect "all of your web browsing data". Just sites that link to their homepage from browsers that have the referrer enabled.

    5. Re:Blinkx website privacy page. by mikeophile · · Score: 1

      After reading the rest of the site blinkx seems pretty tame privacy-wise. I believe I incorrectly inferred that they collect search data.

      They have a nice interface too.

    6. Re:Blinkx website privacy page. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Um, you do know that a default apache install logs exactly the same kind of data (IP, pages visited, refering URL, etc) don't you? Also, any modern web app practically has to use cookies, as it's the only way to maintain state without a superlong URL.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
  7. Free advertising by goldspider · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Could this be the first real technology threat for Google?"

    Free advertising on The Guardian and Slashdot can't hurt.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Free advertising by timts · · Score: 0
      actually it might hurt them, since they are not getting money but have to pay the huge bandwidth from slashdot.

      I tried "screw you" as keywords in it, the result comes back very slow and it's not what I want

    2. Re:Free advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't get screwed?

    3. Re:Free advertising by acebone · · Score: 1

      D'OH ! You have to search for 'Screw Me' to get that ...

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
  8. And they hated Google . . . by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, and people made such a fuss over Google reading your e-mail for ads, doesn't look like this is any better:

    And you have to do nothing! Whenever you browse a website, read a news story, check your e-mail or write a document, blinkx automatically delivers suggestions from the Web, news or your local files; which you can view by simply clicking the links or rolling over to get a summary of the information found.

    Not only email, it does everything!

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:And they hated Google . . . by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      Yea, and that sounds a lot more like spyware than Gmail's barely noticeably text ads.

    2. Re:And they hated Google . . . by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One important difference: Google stores your info on their servers, and parses them for ads on their servers. This does the searching and parsing on your machine, and just requests ads from the server (according to their privacy policy)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:And they hated Google . . . by cuzality · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So where do I get my invitation to blinkx?

    4. Re:And they hated Google . . . by Zaranne · · Score: 1

      When I said I needed some new search engines...this is not what I meant. I need to search the NET, not have it search ME!!!

      Zar
      I have learned that you cannot make someone love you. All you can do is stalk them and hope they panic and give in.

      --
      So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    5. Re:And they hated Google . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of ads, chalk another tally mark for paid placement on slashdot.

    6. Re:And they hated Google . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And you have to do nothing! Whenever you browse a website, read a news story, check your e-mail or write a document, blinkx automatically delivers suggestions from the Web, news or your local files; which you can view by simply clicking the links or rolling over to get a summary of the information found.

      Note to self: make sure the wife and kids aren't using the same browser that I use to search for porn...

    7. Re:And they hated Google . . . by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who cares, as long as no data is sent to them?

      I do care if they read stuff and collect it, but if they don't, what's the problem? Same goes for Gmail btw.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:And they hated Google . . . by toasted_calamari · · Score: 1

      It's funny, people made such a big deal about how google parses your emails on the server. Of course, everyone who sends mail through a server with spamassasin installed has their messages parsed in a similar way.

    9. Re:And they hated Google . . . by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the same thing alexa used to be?

      Why would anyone want this? Is it also supposed to be similar to the old what's related in Netscape 4.x (Powered by alxea back in the day?)?

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  9. Uh... by xenostar · · Score: 2, Funny

    For some reason the words "search companion" always make me cringe.

    1. Re:Uh... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      For some reason the words "search companion" always make me cringe.

      You mean like "Trusted Computing"?

    2. Re:Uh... by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      I'm inclined to think more along the lines of "Bonzi Buddy"

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  10. The Good and The Bad by marnargulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On one hand this is obviously potentionally spyware. I mean, it logs everything you do, and advises you to check out such and such. However:
    Did anyone check out that graphical linking system? It was genious. You go to a seed link, and it spiders from there. Graphically representing the links each time. So you search for "frogs" and it starts a "frogs" seed. Then a few branches come out, such as "frog legs", "cromwell's frog" and "horned frog". Then those branch new links as well. And it just keeps going. At first I said "this is stupid, I searched for a broad term, and only get 3 links?" but then I watched as it added sublinks to main links, and was very impressed.

    1. Re:The Good and The Bad by cuzality · · Score: 1


      The "graphical linking system" looks a lot like the Kartoo search engine...

    2. Re:The Good and The Bad by nine-times · · Score: 1
      'Did anyone check out that graphical linking system?'

      It doesn't seem to work for me, but it looks like it might be kind of like The Visual Thesaurus. It's pretty neat, and I've been wondering when someone else would license their "thinkmap technology" for other things.

    3. Re:The Good and The Bad by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Or you could have the same result by using a more specific search, without all the clicky-clicky and without having to hope that you guess the right sub-catagory.

      Nope, google got search right, interface wise.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:The Good and The Bad by marnargulus · · Score: 1

      This isn't about effieciency or anything like that, it is about innovation. This was just something that I hadn't seen (at least that was implemented in a usefull manner). Sure they don't having it working like Google has thiers, but Google has been around for a while, and they aren't exactly stupid over there. They are the best in the biz. I'm just saying this is like a new type of PDA came out with a display that went wirelessly to your glasses. The quality will be poor at the start, but it is the starting point that is really important. Imagine if Google decided to make something like this, where their searching was optionally shown as a 3d model. You could find parent links, and not just be researching the same sight over and over because someone else linked to it from their page and you got a hit from that. The graph shows "oh this is just a link back to that page" and it is intuitively obvious.

  11. Won't be a threat by Dibson · · Score: 0

    a threat as long as it's only on Windows. IE security will just keep blinkxing yr system down.

    --
    -- Why keep us waiting? We are not made of time.
  12. You're right by GillBates0 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Blinkx has two selling points. First, it doesn't only search the web but simultaneously scours news sites, emails, attachments and your own hard disk. It also searches blogs.

    Google searches blogs too. So their USP is that it "scours" your hard disk and emails and lots of other "local" information as well. That's exactly what spyware does.

    Heck, I think (not sure here) that the Myway and other spywarish IE toolbars provide a search box to search the web while monitoring my "local" activity.

    I really don't see what the big deal is here. It's a whole lot of BIG words (contextual/etc) without much substance.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:You're right by gowen · · Score: 3, Informative
      Google searches blogs too. So their USP is that it "scours" your hard disk and emails and lots of other "local" information as well. That's exactly what spyware does.
      Hell, thats what Windows "Find" does, or find . -print | xargs grep

      The important point is *what happens to that data*. Spyware collates it and sends it to its master. Blinkx says that theres doesn't do this.

      So its not spyware.

      Mind the strap on that tinfoil hat.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:You're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blinkx says that theres (typographical error; probably "there's") doesn't do this.

      So its not spyware.


      Talk is cheap. Let's see some source code.

    3. Re:You're right by ack154 · · Score: 0

      You know... Gator (and any other spyware app out there) says they're not spyware either...

      Just FYI.

    4. Re:You're right by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

      theirs sorry

    5. Re:You're right by cavicster · · Score: 1

      Whether it is spyware or not the word "Search Companion" is a bitter term and it was a poor choice to use it.

    6. Re:You're right by stoborrobots · · Score: 3, Informative

      The key is more than that Blinkx doesn't use it for spying... The USP is that it uses the local information as a context for the search (and potentially the ads as well). Google cannot know what you're working on, so it guesses from the keywords. Spyware doesn't care, it mostly only feeds you ads. Blinkx (claims to) use the information to improve the quality of your search results.

  13. Google already dangerous.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    There was an article a while ago about using Google to search for "hidden" files and such on servers. There was an interview with a guy who did it and everything. If Google can already do this and Gmail can search your e-mails (some of us lucky ones of course), why do we need a crappy thing to "enhance it"?

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Google already dangerous.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Google article you are talking about was about stupid people who store private shit on public webservers and think that if they don't link to the file from their homepage, no one can download it.

    2. Re:Google already dangerous.. by cuzality · · Score: 1

      blinkx is just trying to head off Google, which is working on a utility that will apply Google's search power to your computer.

      Story:
      SAN FRANCISCO, May 18 - Edging closer to a direct confrontation with Microsoft, Google, the Web search engine, is preparing to introduce a powerful file and text software search tool for locating information stored on personal computers.

      Google's software, which is expected to be introduced soon, according to several people with knowledge of the company's plans, is the clearest indication to date that the company, based in Mountain View, Calif., hopes to extend its search business to compete directly with Microsoft's control of desktop computing.
      ...

  14. Maybe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New technology promises to destroy Mecha-Google... In Japan.

  15. A REAL Search Engine by tgrigsby · · Score: 4, Funny

    So search engines have gone from searching a dedicated database to searching the text on the internet. Then it was searching images on the 'net. Now they can extend that to searching your email and local drives, all with one interface.

    Cool.

    But if you really want to impress me, make one that can search my house, my pockets, and my kids' rooms for my keys and wallet....

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    1. Re:A REAL Search Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad, I took your wallet. I am sorry. There was no money in it, I swear.

    2. Re:A REAL Search Engine by alip · · Score: 1
      But if you really want to impress me, make one that can search my house, my pockets, and my kids' rooms for my keys and wallet....

      Imagine the privacy advocates jumping on that one.

    3. Re:A REAL Search Engine by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Funny

      But if you really want to impress me, make one that can search my house, my pockets, and my kids' rooms for my keys and wallet

      They have those already. They're called burglars... oh, you meant you wanted something to search for your keys and wallet and return them to you.

    4. Re:A REAL Search Engine by Trailwalker · · Score: 1
      oh, you meant you wanted something to search for your keys and wallet and return them to you


      Away from /. land, this is done by a creature called a "wife".
    5. Re:A REAL Search Engine by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Away from /. land, this is done by a creature called a "wife".

      However, you can't integrate "wife" with the search engine because you do not want "wife" to know all your search results for porn. And doesn't "wife" classify as spyware? "Wife" takes your credit card and banking details and does more damage than the Russian Mafia could with that information.

  16. Re:Worse that CmdrTaco! by strictnein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Worse that CmdrTaco!
    Holy shit! The submitter's grammar is worse than CmdrTaco's!

    GUESS WHO? You!

  17. In a related story.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardrives an order of magnitude too small, and broadband an order of magnitude too slow....

  18. So what's the big deal? by dacarr · · Score: 1

    It sounds like what google ads does anyway from within the unpaid versions of Opera.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  19. um, it bites? by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, when you asked if this was a technology threat to google, did you mean to indicate that you'd tried the technology? I'm working on a project on the CRM industry right now and just tried a variety of searches in both blinkx and google, and blinkx was not only less relevant, but also way, way slower.

    1. Re:um, it bites? by yohan1701 · · Score: 1

      I also tried it and found it painfully slow. I could be a /. effect but I don't think so.

  20. Re:Could this be Google's first technology threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Usenet? That posse of Luddite introverts stopped being relevant five years ago.

  21. Technology Threat for Google? Maybe yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing is that google is limited to a website, that means that you have to run a browser every time you want to search for information.
    Its seems to be a good idea to use a software to do all that work (they are right, its even faster) but some of us are so paranoid about spyware that we can't trust anyone.
    So its up to you if you want to try it. I'll wait until they release the linux port.

  22. no Thunderbird support by lart2150 · · Score: 1

    the e-mail part of blinkx only works with outlook (express) and eudora.

    1. Re:no Thunderbird support by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      the e-mail part of blinkx only works with outlook (express) and eudora.

      Not to mention that it doesn't work on Linux or the Mac, or with any browsers other than Internet Explorer.
  23. first real technology threat? by Yogurt+Earl · · Score: 0

    Could this be the first real technology threat for Google?


    No.

  24. BBC story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The BBC is also running a story on this.

  25. *cough* OSX *cough* by citizen6350 · · Score: 1

    this functionality has existed on OSX for several years now..

    --
    "Sorry Im not more user-friendly."
    1. Re:*cough* OSX *cough* by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      this functionality has existed on OSX for several years now

      I'm on OS X. Is there some app or Sherlock plugin you download for this? Do you have a link?

    2. Re:*cough* OSX *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my TI powerbook is currently broken (the LCD screen cracked, and Apple doesnt cover that in the original warrenty) so I cant look it up. I AM thinking of a particular 3rd party program-- its a tool that stays up in the bar and when you press a combonation like 'apple+space' a drop down appears, in which you type 3 letters. This will give you the top 15 matches (from all of your apps/emails/etc) that you can choose from/open.

      I cant for the life of me remember its name!

    3. Re:*cough* OSX *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSX has a feature that displays ads to you while working on your computer? Pfew, happy I'm not a Mac user.

  26. about the speed by skeletor935 · · Score: 0

    Considering everyone from slashdot just searched using their wesite, the speed has been reduced to a relaxing 4000000000 ms

  27. I'll Stick To Google by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 1
    I think I'll stick to Google on this one. Yeah, it's fairly cool looking, but over my dial up connection, Google actually gives me what I want quickly. This gives me some good stuff, perhaps in a better way that Google does, but it takes a second or two longer. I know I should have patience, but I use Google because it's fast and it's not cluttered. I can't say the same for Blinkx.

    With any luck, this will offer another major engine though. The less people who are using one search engine, the harder it is to build a page just so it will come up quickly in search results.

    1. Re:I'll Stick To Google by Errtu76 · · Score: 1

      Competition is always good. It helps improvement on the existing software. Just look at what yahoo/hotmail did in response to gmail. Everyone tries to keep up with standards, improvements and in the end you, the end-user, have a broader choice of search engine.

      But yeah, i'll stick with google too (for now). Having an extra app running in case i 'might' be interested in whatever is on my screen, is not for me. Imagine this thing running through a proxy server at work. Somebody wants to be funny and writes you an email with offensive/inappropriate words in it. Blinkx grabs those words and searches for them. All through the (probably) monitored proxy. Not cool.

  28. The name Blinkx by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

    Isn't Blinkx the name of that purple ape on that Bonzai Buddy adware/spyware?

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  29. Not a threat if... by caldroun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...it is "Optimized for IE & Broadband Users". Google is not so.

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
    1. Re:Not a threat if... by congaflum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You gotta love the use of the term "optimized for", when waht they actually mean is "requires" :-)

    2. Re:Not a threat if... by Bloodlent · · Score: 1

      Ummm. Requires? No. It works fine on the Moz.

    3. Re:Not a threat if... by congaflum · · Score: 1

      Well, they do have "blinkx Broadband requires Microsoft Internet Explorer(TM) 6.0 or above" written in a wee font right above where it says "Optimized for IE & Broadband Users".

      Perhaps they were too lazy to try it in anything else.

    4. Re:Not a threat if... by magefile · · Score: 1

      Works fine in Moz and Firefox, on Win, Lin and Mac. I haven't tried it in Opera, but others have posted saying they have. Perhaps they only *support* IE, but it works anyway.

    5. Re:Not a threat if... by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      "optimized" usually means the designer copy-and-pasted someone else's code instead of using frontpage like everyone else does

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    6. Re:Not a threat if... by congaflum · · Score: 1

      You are talking about "Blink Broadband" right? (That's the part that they claim is "optimized for IE"). It certainly doesn't work in Firefox when I try it.

      In IE, I get a list of search categories on the left, which gradually turn red as they get populated. Hovering over one updates the results panel on the right.

      In Firefox, only the top category seems to get populated. Hovering over the other categories does sod all.

      And sections like "news" and "visualizer" are just disabled.

  30. I remember this... by Mildog · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Blinkx. I remember this back when it was called "Bonzi Buddy".

  31. Review of Blinkx by glinden · · Score: 4, Informative

    A good review of Blinkx with some discussion. I've also got a post about Blinkx that includes links to discussions of Linux version of something similar (Dashboard) and Microsoft's attempt (Implicit Query).

    1. Re:Review of Blinkx by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1
      from gigaom.com article discussion:

      ...but this is VERY nice... . Its almost enough to get me to switch back to IE as my main browser

      Comment by Rick Gregory 6/17/2004 @ 2:23 pm

      see how dangerous that blinkx thing is!

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  32. Watson Search Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watson delivers context-aware intelligent information retrieval technologies to create critical search improvements. With Watson on the desktop, users get the information they need from a variety of private and public online sources -- delivered automatically while they work. You can learn more about Watson at http://www.openroad-tech.com

    The system came out of the research of Jay Budzik at Northwestern's Intelligent Information Laboratory.

  33. meta-reply by proj_2501 · · Score: 0

    in soviet russia...web searches YOU! (in japan)

  34. They're not alone by joeykiller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe this is a threat to Google, but I don't think the competitors are far behind. Nat Friedmans Dashboard and Sideboard have been mentioned elsewhere, and it seems like Microsoft is planning a similar application themselves.

    Apparently Google is planning local hard drive searches as well, in a pre-emptive move against improved search techologies that will be a part of Windows/Longhorn.

    So I guess Blinx won't be left alone for long. However, when it comes to search, the more players the better. Google is well on its way to become the new Microsoft, and I don't think it's in anybodys best interest to get a search monopolist.

    1. Re:They're not alone by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Blinkx is only a threat to the users who install it.
      it's just YAN popup toolbar for windows, which infests the windows system and makes it's dll's unwritable to all users of the system, except administrator. just what we need, another popup toolbar bringing a flurry of ad windows everytime we do anything in windows, and this one supports firefox and mozilla... instead of just windows explorer and ie... oh and hey, what google is doing isn't reading all your local files to serv targted popup ads, but rather, trying to make it easier for you to search for things weather they are on your hd or the internet... and no it won't let you search your neighbors hd.. that's what kazza-lite is for...

  35. Spotlight by atomm1024 · · Score: 1

    This sounds a LOT like Spotlight, a search technology built into Apple's next major Mac OS X revision, 10.4 Tiger. Of course, Blinkx could be anywhere from coincidence to an unusually fast and successful emergency-Apple-ripoff.

    --
    Signature.
  36. Going back to the newpsaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google with their fancy alogrithmithings, netforks and other gizmos, I'll just sit on my front porch and read the paper like I always do.

  37. They don't seem to have very good results by polveroj · · Score: 1

    A search for "google" only brings up pages on *.google.*, and google.com is near the end. Either they don't index many pages or they limit the number of results for each search. (It's also possible that they just hate google.)

    1. Re:They don't seem to have very good results by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      A search for "google" only brings up pages on *.google.*, and google.com is near the end.

      Yes, that is because, like the article says, "it uses artificial intelligence". They have programmed it to intelligently keep you away from their competitors.

  38. Re:Could this be Google's first technology threat? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This can easily be wiped out by companies like Microsoft and Apple anyway. In Apple's case, all they would need to do is link Spotlight with Sherlock with some simple plugin.

    The reason Google can compete is that it isn't an application that you have to download. Anything that is a downloadable application will be easily snuffed by major software companies like those that make instant messaging apps like Microsoft, AOL, Yahoo, and Apple.

  39. All crap. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

    With these two...

    1) Spotlight
    http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/spotl ight.html

    2) Google
    http://www.google.com

    I won't need anything else. I wish "Search Engines" was a catagory so I could uncheck it and ignore all search engine news. I've got 1 and 2. I'm done.

    1. Re:All crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, Spotlight is just a rip-off of LaunchBar, which I was using for months when I was on a Mac (10.2.x even, didn't have to pay for an upgrade).

      So all you people who say that Apple never copies, only innovates... let this be a lesson to you.

  40. Re:bullinks, & you'll miss robbIE? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    the ok.txt stuff seems to be a check for open proxies. See my journal for a discussion on this. The other stuff is pretty lame attempts to screw up wndows boxes. Again, see my journal entries.

  41. Interesting software.... by changa · · Score: 1


    This seems and interesting concept... But could they PLEASE not use light grey text on a white backround.

    This thing is hurting my eyes.

  42. Remembrance Agent for emacs all over again. by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

    Sounds just like the Remembrance Agent for emacs which has been around since about 1996. It's also similar to the Dashboard program that Nat Friedman made for Gnome. There's enough prior art that I have no doubt that blinkx will get a patent.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  43. just whois the hostIE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in our journal, it looks to be robbIE.snoop?

  44. Find a needle in a Haystack by Croaker-bg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This harkens back to the good ole Haystack doo-ma-jiggy that came out of MIT sometime ago (slashdot Here and MIT HERE)

    The concept is a simple one. Don't keep things in order in your folders in email or on your machine anymore. Just dump it all in one big place and have a meta engine of some sort index it all for you and then build queries for what you need. Realistically this is a great idea for those folks that had problems using the analog file cabinet for so many years (ala Jimmy James and the file of banana under "bright curved yellow things" for instance). The potential for abuse is really no greater than if M$ were to upload all of your "explorer find" searches back to Redmond. Those of you that us XP when you have to will notice that there is even an option to save a search query now for quick use within the XP shell. All this new company has done is just made it a little easier for the typical end user to create their search meta engine. The MIT one was brutal for a learning curve and more importantly it didnt have a decent place to put advertisements!

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Search information from your desktop by kalki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "search information from your desktop"

    This one feature is enough to know that Blinks is not going any where.

    I don't know why people are still tied to the Desktop. One of the great success of Google is that its not tied to the desktop (yeah, I know they are working on desktop tools too).

    People travel and move, change computers, change system, reformat...blah..blah. All that learning over your desktop is of no good use.

    Beauty of google (web interface search) is i get the same great results no matter where I acces it from, which machin I access from ...

    Desktop search sucks...but the concept of desktop itself sucks in the first place.

  47. Windows only... by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

    I guess that I'll just stick with `find | grep` and grepping through my mail directories. No biggie, can probably find what I'm looking for quicker anyways.

  48. Optimized for Broadband ? by apankrat · · Score: 1

    Optimized for IE & Broadband Users

    I was not tracking recent haxor lingo developments, but doesn't
    "Optimized for Broadband" mean "Now With Even More Bloat" ?
    Am I supposed to be excited by it ?

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
    1. Re:Optimized for Broadband ? by caldroun · · Score: 1

      Translation: More crud we can shove down your pipe.

      --
      "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  49. Interface, compatability. by Tragek · · Score: 1
    I see a couple of big problems in the future for blinkx (besides the obvious problems of a stupid name and ad pun).

    First off: Blinx requires XP or 2000. Sure, that's a big market, but even in windows, 40% of people still run windows 98.

    IE is required, though mozilla support is supposedly in dev.

    Second of all, did anyone try out blinkx broadband.... what interface woes. Slow, bloated, and the big U word: UGLY! The licence is also not exactly optimal....

  50. No mac support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since it requires Windows only the masses will be able to use it. As I am typing this on a Mac, I have yet to use it, but it sounds like spyware that catches the ideas of what people are looking for. Why not build this into a website like google or make code it in Java so everyone can use it? I see this as much as a threat to Google as HotBot, Altavista, or Excite.

  51. spyware by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1

    install a spyware agent on your system? no thanks. i like my data. and i'd like it to be mine. it's up to me alone whether i want to share my data with the wider world. blinkx as a threat to google ? not a chance. google can sleep easy, as i'm sure they are already doing.

  52. A new Slashdot category by LS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, now that Slashdot is accepting submissions for spyware, I think they should create a new category. They didn't accept my submission for Bonzi Buddy!!!

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  53. Technology threat? by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    I see this as unlikley. Google has technology so advanced it is surrounded by "top secret" style secrecy. In other words we have no idea what Google is working on. What we do know is it is always something revolutionary and suprising. Only time will tell but it is reasonable to expect that Google is already working on the next big thing and is more likley than not to continue to be on the razor edge of technology

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  54. Re:erm.. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1
    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  55. Does it run on other consoles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked, Blinkx needs the XBox hard drive to support its '4D' gaming feature...

  56. What about Watson? by sanjaysood · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Watson delivers context-aware intelligent information retrieval technologies to create critical search improvements. With Watson on the desktop, users get the information they need from a variety of private and public online sources -- delivered automatically while they work. You can learn more about Watson at http://www.openroad-tech.com

    The system came out of the research of Jay Budzik at Northwestern's Intelligent Information Laboratory.

  57. Blinx sounds cool, but unfortunately... by jcjewell · · Score: 1

    ... I, like many others I suspect, simply won't install blinkx because it requires IE, which I refuse to use anymore.

    Long live FireFox/Mozilla.

  58. Ha! by jpsowin · · Score: 1

    Did you even look at their homepage before suggesting they are a threat to google? It is horrible. Their motto is "blinkx And You'll Never Miss It." They can't capitalize their own name but they can capitalize "And." Looks like a spyware company without a webmaster to me.

    Threat? Google? This must be a joke. Maybe Webtek is a threat as well.

    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      blinkx And You'll Never Miss It.

      I know they were trying to come up with a catchy slogan, but it can also be interpreted as "Try Out blinkx And You'll Never Miss It" because you'll never use it again.

  59. did anyone else read the comments on the review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....talk about astroturfing....

  60. Ok, Blinkx looks lame, but: by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a Spotlight-like search mechanism for Win2K? No, I'm not interested in WinFS. I want something that will index every local file/email and let me search it via a live query like Spotlight will.

    I know there are shareware projects like this for the Mac. Does anyone have any experience with shareware products like this for the PC? Anything you like?

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:Ok, Blinkx looks lame, but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about X1?

    2. Re:Ok, Blinkx looks lame, but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to ZOË "Googling Your Email"
      http://zoe.nu/

  61. Worthless by Skraut · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What good is a search engine if it can't find me litigious bastards

    Though, it can help you find Slashdot http://us-search.blinkx.com/BlinkxBroadband/?q=lit igious+bastards&x=10&y=6

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:Worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The results look pretty good when I just clicked this link - which means they may have read the comments and done something about it or have done what they claim with "every search you do helps it learn more"..?

      The refine search checkboxes are a definite bonus though - check results 1 and 3 and click refine and you get a list of documents - every one about the SCO/litigious bastards saga.

      Google just appears to help advertise SCO - any related query takes you directly to www.sco.com.

  62. Time Sweeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first, I thought this was somehow related to Blinx- The Time Sweeper, one of the worst concepts ever to hit a game console.

  63. Re:erm.. by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    All that stuff is very cool, what it makes me wonder is how much cooler the stuff they don't make public is.

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  64. BlinkX is in no way affiliated by Lispy · · Score: 1

    with BlissX, my band. Had to clarify this.;-)

    1. Re:BlinkX is in no way affiliated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your band suckX.

  65. I'm not allowed to tell you that: by alex_ware · · Score: 1

    blinx only allows "approved" reviews mmmm yessss
    no firefox support

    --
    If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  66. Hrmph by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    I won't even try it until I get some serious assurances that this isn't going to puke spyware on my machine.

    If they were charging money for it I'd be more comfortable with it- it would be obvious where the profit is coming from!

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Hrmph by jd+levy · · Score: 1

      Have you checked out their website? Looks to me like they're planning to make money from ads and commerce...

    2. Re:Hrmph by Halil+H · · Score: 1

      Just saw this on their Website: Blinkx is totally against the principles behind spyware and adware. User's usage of the Internet is private to them and should never be passed on or used by third parties. Blinkx makes no such record of usage and users remain anonymous to us. We consider Pop ups are an intrusion and Blinkx will not utilize such methods. We also believe that any suggestions links or search results should not be tainted by paid inclusion. Such practices mean that users cannot differentiate between links there on merit and because of payment. Blinkx does serve commercial suggestions on its clearly marked shopping channel which users can elect to ignore or disable. We use the income from this to fund our service.

  67. Clearly lying in their EULA by neil.pearce · · Score: 1

    BLINKX NEVER REMOVES, COPIES, FORWARDS, AMENDS OR OTHERWISE MOVES ANY OF YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION from your COMPUTER (INCLUDING YOUR E-MAILS AND DOCUMENTS). YOUR INFORMATION STAYS ON YOUR COMPUTER.

    How do they actually perform a search relevant to the user then? Through the power of ESP? Does it install a feckin' UGella.dll or something?

    1. Re:Clearly lying in their EULA by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      yes but only in the Japanese version

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  68. Sponsored stories. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    You know, for how much Slashdot seems to love Google, I propose they follow in Googles footsteps in terms of advertisers.

    I think they should have a special section at the top of the page where the top three stories are the sponsored stories that always seem to filter in with the rest, but that we inevitably catch.

    This story was nothing more than a press release, and Blinkx has practically zero chance of being a threat to google, especially with the way it generates ad revenue (read some of the other posts here to find out how).

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  69. optimized for IE?????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the fact that most people who try out new technology trends like these don't use IE, wouldn't it help blinkx if they removed the note 'Optimized for IE'??? To me, that was a turn-off.

  70. Once again... by duncangough · · Score: 1

    It's interesting what good pedigree and some good PR will do. The app. is destined for nothing though - no-one really wants to search locally and on the network at the same time. "Where did I lose my files? Was it here, on my laptop, or over there, on the ever-expanding web?" The only interesting thing is the Gruaniad article which puts the buzz down to blogs. Which is cute really, PR that incrimintes blogs as a way of hiding the fact that this is just PR.

    1. Re:Once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw the press release yesterday so decided to check this out.....I'm actually finding it really useful...

  71. Cross Platform by ryouki · · Score: 1
    I looked at their sight enough to find this:


    blinkx is not currently available for Macintosh or Mozilla, but due to your requests, we're working on it!


    Without support for Mozilla, I doubt it works on any *nix.

    A search engine that works on one platform is not much of a search engine.
    1. Re:Cross Platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just downloaded this - according to website, support for Mozilla coming early August.

  72. Re:Could this be Google's first technology threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n00b

  73. Re:Could this be Google's first technology threat? by timeOday · · Score: 1
    No.
    What it could be is the first acquisition of a newly cash-gorged public google.com.
  74. TROLL - Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from their website:

    blinkx is not currently available for Macintosh or Mozilla, but due to your requests, we're working on it!

    As disappointed as I am that it is not available for Firefox or Mozilla yet, this sounds like a lousy troll.

  75. tech is irrelevant - doomed by stupid name by gribbly · · Score: 1

    Could this be the first real technology threat for Google?

    Maybe, but it's kind of a moot point because that's a really stupid name. I didn't read the article, and quite frankly I don't have to know that this won't catch on unless it's licensed to/duplicated by someone else who gives it a reasonable moniker.

    "Oh I found it using Blinkx"? What the hell where they thinking...?

    grib.

    --
    maybe
  76. Re:erm.. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    desire to inflate stock price can do wonders for that kind of curiosity :)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  77. I use find like this by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1
    I think find . -print | xargs grep does not print the filename, so I use find . -exec grep $WORD {} \; -print


    MS might come out with a new filesystem anyway that is indexed. So lets see how blinkx does.



    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  78. blinkx - Amazon connection? by jd+levy · · Score: 1

    Anyone else heard rumours that Amazon are behind this?

    1. Re:blinkx - Amazon connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I did... ...heard they are keeping it quiet...dont wanna piss of A9

    2. Re:blinkx - Amazon connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be a case of Alexa revisited....remember that old automated hyperlinking company?