Slashdot Mirror


Behind The Coolest Gadgets - Linux or Windows?

An anonymous reader submits "Sister sites LinuxDevices and WindowsForDevices have kicked off what they're calling the Great Embedded Device Smack-Down, to see whether Linux or Windows Embedded powers the best and coolest devices. The Smackdown highlights more than 350 gadgets in nine categories, along with some entertaining "pre-game commentary" featuring the latest market share figures for the two OSes and a whacky clipart image of Stone Cold Bill Gates taking on The Tux."

178 comments

  1. Slash fixed now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    was slash slashdotted, or was it a server problem?

    I think we need to know.

    1. Re:Slash fixed now? by Truid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      see this post for more info 503 errors on 7/28/2004 seems to have been a perl issue but I doubt we will ever know the truth. Security Through Obscurity the slashdot way .

    2. Re:Slash fixed now? by mysterious_mark · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Looks loke slashdot got slashdotted?! Had to drink an entire cup of coffee slashdot free! M

  2. MacOS? by Scrameustache · · Score: 0

    iPod

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:MacOS? by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

      iPod doesn't run MacOS 9 or 10, I don't think it even runs darwin. Correct me if i'm wrong about darwin.

    2. Re:MacOS? by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      Ipod's embeded software is not MacOS....

    3. Re:MacOS? by K-Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      iPod runs an embedded OS, as does the Airport Express (Broadcom chipset, I believe, with Linux, like Linksys routers). Apple seems to have more embedded OS's than regular ones.

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    4. Re:MacOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod runs on a slimmed down version of Mac OS X. Check for the mach_kernel on the root of the drive.

  3. Neither? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What runs an iPod?

    1. Re:Neither? by koi88 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not mac os, not linux, not windows.
      Apple bought the iPod's operating system from Pixo, a small company, that meanwhile has been acquired by Sun (try www.pixo.com).
      It seems to be a proprietary OS.
      Some information: http://www.fact-index.com/p/pi/pixo.html

      --

      I don't need a signature.
  4. I would like to see more devices like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they are neat and good for the community to toy with. Who knows what inventions could become from this?

  5. thats just wrong by Zorak+Man · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I knew gats didn't like linux, but to resort to violance, I didn't think he was even that low.

    --

    404 .sig not found
    1. Re:thats just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to type.

    2. Re:thats just wrong by solive1 · · Score: 1

      I don't think gatling guns would have an operating system preference.

    3. Re:thats just wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could use some spelling lessons as well.

  6. Popcorn by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 4, Funny

    My Linux popcorn maker maximizes the popped to unpopped kernel ratio. Far superior to my older Windows model.

    --

    --
    Are you a Chipotle Fan?
    1. Re:Popcorn by wackysootroom · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not Fair!!!

      The Linux version of the popcorn maker uses a much better kernel than the windows version.

    2. Re:Popcorn by fbrain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought the Windows kernel popped more ofter?

      --
      Avontech | Play dirty! They started it!
    3. Re:Popcorn by VistaBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought the Linux popcorn maker put more kernels into a panic.

    4. Re:Popcorn by tyler_larson · · Score: 4, Funny
      The Linux version of the popcorn maker uses a much better kernel than the windows version.

      The Linux popper does infact use a much more solid kernel than the Windows version. Microsoft tried to harden their kernels by popping modified microkernels instead.

      Unfortunately, over time, the unpopped pieces tend to accumulate at the bottom of the Windows popper, substantially slowing the popping process, and periodically requiring the user to completely wipe the machine and start over fresh with a new batch.

      The Windows popper also seems to be highly susceptible to contamination by foreign elements, affecting output performance and popcorn quality. Microsoft, in response to this problem, simply stated that "well-behaved butter would not damage the popper". Unfortunately, there's a wide selection of low-grade butter available for the Windows popper; some of it actually targets the weaker aspects of the Microsoft kernels and can cause substantial damage to the popper and anything connected to it.

      The Linux popper is much better adapted for mission-critical kitchens, though the Windows popper is extremely popular in the home.

      --
      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
      RFC 1925
    5. Re:Popcorn by mike260 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but my Windows popcorn maker's got a big, shiny on/off button instead of a command prompt.

    6. Re:Popcorn by gosand · · Score: 1
      The Linux version of the popcorn maker uses a much better kernel than the windows version.

      The Windows version is just a bunch of half-popped kernels with lots and lots of extra butter and salt on them to make them seem more appealing.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    7. Re:Popcorn by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      DON'T YOU DIE ON ME, BENEDETTO!!!!!!

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

      I am yelling.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    8. Re:Popcorn by spacefrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The Linux popper is much better adapted for mission-critical kitchens, though the Windows popper is extremely popular in the home."

      Probably because home users don't like having to type:

      $ cat ~/corn > /dev/snack/popcorn/input
      $ pop_ctl --startup --device=/dev/snack/popcorn
      $ pop_ctl --status --device/dev/snack/popcorn

      popcorn status: popping 342/7873 kernels. .....20 minutes elapses....

      $ pop_ctl --status --device/dev/snack/popcorn

      popcorn status: complete, waiting in buffer.

      $ cat /dev/snack/popcorn/output > ~/bowl

    9. Re:Popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but still, MacPopper pop twice as fast!

    10. Re:Popcorn by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tried typing that into my popper, and it didn't work... What are you running, BTW? I'm on a pretty old setup, so let me guess- you're running the new version of the corn shell?

      HAHA. god. that hurts.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    11. Re:Popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you don't know about popkorn that is included in the latest version of KDE?

    12. Re:Popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people have found that some kernels in their Windows popper record their popcorn eating habits and send it off to a company on the Internet.

      I also heard that the windows popcorn licensing is going to change in 2005, and the next version will have popcorn rights management all over it. I guess the popcorn suppliers are close buddies with the manufacturer of the windows popper.

      There is also a forum where people are very actively porting Linux to the Zpopper, which out-of-the-box also runs Windows but is a lot cheaper than the official Linux and Windows poppers. Rumors say that the manufacturer of the Windows popper is trying to stop all this, but I don't think they'll succeed with that.

    13. Re:Popcorn by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      No. MacPopper pops the most perfect popcorn, but it takes forever.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
  7. Did anyone else... by Throtex · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... just click on the link to see the "whacky clipart image", then hit the back button immediately after? Or was it just me? :)

    1. Re:Did anyone else... by xsecrets · · Score: 1

      Sure did, but only 10 posts and already /. effect has kicked in.

  8. At least by Hitch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it seems like this is all in good fun...
    it's nice to see good-natured rivalry based on merits rather than name-calling and finger pointing.

    --
    You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
    http://propheteer.org
    1. Re:At least by doofusclam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Definitely. Some folks round here could do with remembering this, rather than taking any Linux/MS remarks personally.

    2. Re:At least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are obviously a karma grubbing M$ employee.

    3. Re:At least by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      So what..You callin me a Windows Weenie? HuH? HuH?
      Let's take this outside!

      --
      Sig it.
  9. Love our Cyclades console port servers by csoto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Our old TS models are great, but the new ACS are even better. Darn easy to use, and rock solid.

    They run Linux, BTW...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:Love our Cyclades console port servers by mangu · · Score: 1

      There's also a development system for those who want to create custom applications. I used a bunch of TS's with software I wrote when no other terminal server could do what I wanted.

  10. Alternate view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the Windows model run hotter, though?

  11. Choosy Robots Choose Linux by grunt107 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a recent study, 100% of all robots that reported chose Linux.

    1. Re:Choosy Robots Choose Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you misspelled "slashbots." Oh wait...

  12. So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It's embedded, so long as it runs seamlessly so that it does what it should why on earth is any customer going to give a flying fuck what OS it runs.

  13. Number of Devices by Noksagt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The table of how many devices of which type run which OS seems to only list which OS devices ship with. Linux has been ported to many Windows devices, so you cna flash them to Linux. While windows should work with many of the linux devices, I think it isn't trivial to buy a license to put it on your device that shipped with Linux & to then flash it to run windows.

    1. Re:Number of Devices by DMadCat · · Score: 1

      Seems to me they didn't do very good research on these lists.

      Apparently they've never run into Neoware Thin Clients running Linux?

  14. DRM... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it runs Microsoft's software, then it necessarily has some sort of DRM on it. Thus, I'd have to favor Linux.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:DRM... by danheskett · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If it runs Microsoft's software, then it necessarily has some sort of DRM on it. Thus, I'd have to favor Linux.
      Nope. Not true. A Big Old Lie.

    2. Re:DRM... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but that does not make it a lie.

      Also, if you can point me to a music device that runs Microsoft's software that does NOT have ANY DRM on it, please provide a link.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:DRM... by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "If it runs Microsoft's software, then it necessarily has some sort of DRM on it."

      Care to back that up with some sort of logic? Tell you what, explain what DRM is on my Windows Mobile PDA and mo, the ability to play back DRM files is NOT DRM in and of itself unless you think that Real Player for Linux makes Linux DRM as well.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:DRM... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it can play back DRM files, then it necessarily has DRM on it. I hate to say it, but DUH!!!

      And of course SOME Linux devices will have DRM on them, but not all of them will. Microsoft is in the DRM business, then it will bundle DRM at every opportunity it gets. While the decision to include DRM in a Linux device will be made by the individual OEM.

      Thus, with a Microsoft derived product, you will get DRM. With a Linux derived product, you might get DRM. I'll take my chances with might.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    5. Re:DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is not bliss!

      Just because DRM is there, doesnt mean its used does it? You obviously dont understand DRM one bit, and your comments have proven your ignorance to anything beyond, oh MS = DRM = Evil.

      MS derived does NOT mean it has DRM. Get a clue. Not all MS products have DRM.

      Now, care to try again?

    6. Re:DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because DRM is there, doesnt mean its used does it?

      Excellent !! The DRM is sitting there just to fry some chicken, right ? Why do you get your logic from ?

      MS derived does NOT mean it has DRM.

      Have you ever tried installing the latest windows media player on your beloved XP/2k desktop/laptop ? Do it before doing sweeet talking on behalf of M$.

      As the parent said, with linux there is the choice of getting rid of DRM, if possible. Not so with MS.

    7. Re:DRM... by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      You'd favor something that didn't let you play files with the DRM as opposed to something that did. Just because the device is DRM capable doesn't mean it's forced on you. Nobody makes you click the button to enable DRM on wma encoding.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    8. Re:DRM... by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      Also, if you can point me to a music device that runs Microsoft's software that does NOT have ANY DRM on it, please provide a link.

      How is this relevent? Just because Pocket PC supports DRM media doesn't mean it prevents you from using anything else. The only way to financially support DRM is to buy media that only runs on it.

    9. Re:DRM... by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Why do you get your logic from ?

      Get who you grammar from do your?

  15. Mars Rovers by kippy · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:Mars Rovers by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      Guess Linux gets the prize for most "far out" device LOL

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Mars Rovers by bsd4me · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC, Wind River had a picture on their homepage of one of the previous Mars projects with a blurb saying that it ran VxWorks

      --

      (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    3. Re:Mars Rovers by uss_valiant · · Score: 1

      And if you need a more specific link...

      Mars Rovers are running a real-time linux OS

    4. Re:Mars Rovers by vondo · · Score: 1

      More specific, but says it runs a real time OS from "Wind River." This is vxWorks, not linux. The page never mentions the word "linx"

    5. Re:Mars Rovers by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Quite true - IIRC the Sojurner probe ran VxWorks. From what I heard, VxWorks was even part of the reason for a computer problem they had (not sure of the details). Not as bad as the Spirit problem, though.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    6. Re:Mars Rovers by bsd4me · · Score: 1

      A little digging reveals some of the facts about this. IMHO, a priority inversion problem could have happened with any RTOS, but should have been picked up during testing.

      --

      (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  16. Scary Future by robespierremax · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Microsoft wins the embedded device war, we can look forward to the following things:
    1) Self driving cars which when infested w/ the Sassar2030 worm will all drive us off a cliff
    2) All your personal information stored in a handheld device for your convience... and the convience of the 200+ Spyware programs that are automatically installed as you checkout at walmart
    3) We will finally reach Jupiter only to find out the computer is controlled by a very evil looking red eye "I'm sorry Dave, but you need to download security patches"

    1. Re:Scary Future by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 0

      You're new here. I just want to tell you that you'll fit right in.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:Scary Future by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      1) Self driving cars which when infested w/ the Sassar2030 worm will all drive us off a cliff

      Lemmings, Longhorn edition.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    3. Re:Scary Future by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > 1) Self driving cars which when infested w/ the Sassar2030 worm will all drive us off a cliff
      > Lemmings, Longhorn edition.

      With this Lemmings virus, though, can I designate my car to be a blocker or a builder? Then I would have time to get out before it explodes or drives off the end of the stairs. I don't know where it would get the planks, but I don't know where regular Lemmings get them either.

    4. Re:Scary Future by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Yo! Where you been?!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    5. Re:Scary Future by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Long story... just happened to load it up and see, thought I'd post something. Doubt I'll really be coming back as a prolific poster.

      Got a new job as of today though, which will mean I'm even more busy. How are you doing?

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  17. Linux had an advantage... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... in whatever device that don't have a complex user interaction. The site have more windows devices in PDA, tablets and thin clients where the user could find comfortable using the same interface as in his desktop. But where that interface doesn't matter, Linux should win hands down.

    After all, linux don't have price by quantity (i.e. for devices where price matters is a big advantage), could be use with no x86 processors, could be tweaked for supporting better the surrounding hardware and could require a lot less hardware/memory/etc.

    Anyway, is weird that in the listing they don't put Linux thin clients and terminals, maybe is because almost anything that boots linux and X could work as one, so the market could not be so attractive.

    1. Re:Linux had an advantage... by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      After all, linux don't have price by quantity (i.e. for devices where price matters is a big advantage), could be use with no x86 processors, could be tweaked for supporting better the surrounding hardware and could require a lot less hardware/memory/etc.

      While I can't get to the product listings on the site at the moment, I assume that they're talking about "Windows Embedded" as the latest version of Windows CE, and not Windows XP Embedded. In that context, not all of your arguments stand up. For example, Microsoft's licensing on CE has been very relaxed. Yes, there's still a licensing fee, but it's not all that expensive anymore.


      Also, CE supports several CPUs. The most popular currently seems to be ARM chips, but it also works on x86, MIPS, SH3/4, and I believe even PowerPCs. So, while you could choose to use a x86 processor, you certainly don't have to.


      Finally, the code to CE has been opened up, and while I don't know the exact restrictions on redistributing binaries containing code changes to the core system, I do know that in most cases you don't need to do that at all. Windows CE (and XP Embedded) was designed in a very modular way, and you only need to include the pieces that your application needs. For example, if you want a headless, inputless embedded controller that does all I/O via network, you would include the core kernel and the networking stack, but not the input or output modules. I'm sure you can do the same thing with Linux, but since Linux wasn't designed from the ground up for embedded applications (Windows CE was), the solutions may be more "hacky".


      On a side note, don't confuse Windows CE with Windows NT. The only similarities between the two are the name "Windows" and support for some subset of Win32 (which CE initially wasn't going to support at all, until the designers got smart and realized that there was no reason they couldn't support a small subset of Win32 and allow skills from the large pool of Win32 developers to carry over to the embedded space). The Windows CE kernel was designed independently of NT, and was intended to enforce real-time constraints from the very start. The OS itself really is quite elegant, and even was back in its early life, though the applications (clamshell and pocket PCs) were poor in comparison to competitors (Palm) at the time.

    2. Re:Linux had an advantage... by Moskit · · Score: 1
      The site have more windows devices in PDA, tablets and thin clients where the user could find comfortable using the same interface as in his desktop.

      This could be a very wrong assumption: I do not want my PDA applications to mimic what's on the desktop. Screen size is limited and input methods of PDA are usually different, so applications should take it into account! Desktop apps don't...

      Having used both Linux-based devices (Zaurus) and EPOC PDAs (Psion) I would not hesitate to choose EPOC: software authors follow Symbian GUI design guidelines, making apps very consistent and PDA-friendly to use.

  18. A couple of things by carrett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1. The site is a linuxdevices.com..somehow i think this "grapple" will be biased.
    2. that said, the truth in my experience is that linux supports damn near anything and if it doesn't, you can almost always find a third-party driver because drivers are easier to write when the kernel is open source.
    3. that said, windows is the dominant OS and *a lot* of the mainstream hardware is designed specifically for it. it might be easier to use a device you buy under windows because most "pc hardware" is made to work with windows. it might take time to find the linux driver you need, but eventually you will have it.
    4. continuing on what i said above, if windows hasn't written a driver for your device, you may never see a driver for that device. windows will never have drivers for apple mice/keyboards...they will continue to make their os support only what it needs to to stay on top. this is the difference between corporate and volunteer approaches.

    i'm sure i've only scratched the surface of things that have been said 10000000000000000 times on /. before, but i'd better shut up.

    --
    I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
    1. Re:A couple of things by Coopa · · Score: 1

      ". The site is a linuxdevices.com..somehow i think this "grapple" will be biased." Did you rtfm? If I've read it correctly, there's 2 sites running it. A Windows and Linux one.

    2. Re:A couple of things by dmullenaux · · Score: 2, Informative

      windows will never have drivers for apple mice/keyboards

      Have you tried it? I have for months now been using a USB mac keyboard and mouse in our office server room. Windows 2000 works with it as well as windows 2003. Haven't tried it on NT 4 though.

    3. Re:A couple of things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry NT 4 doesn't do USB so new Apple keyboards will be no go. Old ones are ADB bus and unless you have some sort of converter they aren't going to work either.

    4. Re:A couple of things by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      if windows hasn't written a driver for your device, you may never see a driver for that device. windows will never have drivers for apple mice/keyboards...they will continue to make their os support only what it needs to to stay on top.

      First of all "Windows" doesn't write drivers; Microsoft does. Windows is the name of the product, not of the company that produces it.

      What are you talking about? When I was building a new PC the only extra keyboard I had available to use with it was a USB Apple keyboard. Both the BIOS (on an MSI motherboard) and Windows itself were able to use this keyboard just fine without *any* external drivers needed. I fact, I thought it was pretty clever that Windows automatically re-routed the 'Command' key on the keyboard to be the same as the 'Windows' key.

      Man, that was a stupid post.

  19. How could they miss the HomePod? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MacSense makes the "iPod for the home", in the form of their HomePod. It doesn't run MacOS; it runs Linux and Java (J9).

    More info at GlooLabs.

  20. Palm? by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it interesting that PalmOS is not even mentioned in the "PDA" category. Is it truly dead?

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Palm? by solive1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I do believe this is a Linux gadget vs. Windows gadget article. PalmOS doesn't fit into either of those two categories, therefore its exclusion. (I tried checking the article again to make sure it didn't say something to the contrary, but it seems that it has already been /.ed.)

    2. Re:Palm? by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      or Symbian for that matter. As for BSD? What? don't tell me it's dead

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    3. Re:Palm? by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 1

      Q: Is it truly dead?
      A: Yes.

      --
      "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
    4. Re:Palm? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      PalmOS is far from dead. Hell, even though it is brain dead (in a Mac OS 0.53 kind of way), it beats out Linux PDAs in the area of "usefulness" (as if any other category mattered) 9 out of 10 times.

      But, I point you to the title. "Linux or Windows." There are other PDA/gadget OSes beyond Linux and Windows, but they were only interested in them for this article. I suppose Linux and WinCE capabilities are more alike than the POS.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  21. iPod? by mblase · · Score: 4, Informative

    The iPod's OS isn't MacOS. It isn't even made by Apple. They bought the OS and most of the hardware spec from PortalPlayer and then customized it to their liking.

    1. Re:iPod? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't even made by Apple. They bought the OS and most of the hardware spec from PortalPlayer and then customized it to their liking.

      Doesn't that make it theirs then?
      If they bought it, and customised it?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:iPod? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Theirs perhaps, but they still didnt make it.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:iPod? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You mean like Mac OS X? That's made of two operating systems they didn't make, and parts of one they did, right?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:iPod? by mblase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't that make it theirs then? If they bought it, and customised it?

      No, because PortalPlayer is continuing to license (or try to license) their OS to other manufacturers of portable music devices.

  22. Linux or Windows on the best devices? by airjrdn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tivo runs Linux....nuff said.

    1. Re:Linux or Windows on the best devices? by malfunct · · Score: 1

      My two favorite gadgets are my tivo and my xbox and I think I like my tivo slightly more.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Linux or Windows on the best devices? by airjrdn · · Score: 1

      Almost sounds like you live at my house. :)

      I've modded by XBox and put XBox Media Center & Media Player on it. That's how I view all of my music videos, some movies (for traveling) and where all of my ripped music resides.

  23. neither appear good for websites by craqboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    if the sites are hosted on the corrosponding OS then they are both showing a lot of hurt right now.

    fucking slashdotters :)

    1. Re:neither appear good for websites by XMyth · · Score: 1

      actually linuxdevices is down...windowsfordevices is up...at the moment.

    2. Re:neither appear good for websites by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Well, obvious. This is slashdot, who is interested in stuff running Windows anyway? :-P

      --
      home
    3. Re:neither appear good for websites by steveb964 · · Score: 1

      FYI...

      pearl# nmap -O www.windowsfordevices.com

      Starting nmap 3.51-TEST3 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-07-28 14:58 EDT
      Interesting ports on 216.218.185.157:
      (The 1653 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      135/tcp filtered msrpc
      137/tcp filtered netbios-ns
      138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm
      139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
      4444/tcp filtered krb524
      Device type: general purpose
      Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X
      OS details: Linux 2.4.0 - 2.5.20
      Uptime 41.543 days (since Thu Jun 17 01:56:18 2004)

    4. Re:neither appear good for websites by steveb964 · · Score: 1

      and, looks like their on the same machine, just with different IP's...

      pearl# nmap -O www.linuxdevices.com

      Starting nmap 3.51-TEST3 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-07-28 15:02 EDT
      Interesting ports on 216.218.185.154:
      (The 1653 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      135/tcp filtered msrpc
      137/tcp filtered netbios-ns
      138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm
      139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
      4444/tcp filtered krb524
      Device type: general purpose
      Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X
      OS details: Linux 2.4.0 - 2.5.20
      Uptime 41.546 days (since Thu Jun 17 01:56:18 2004)

  24. its a sad sad day for some by craqboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the windowsfordevices site loaded for me while the linux timed out.......gentoo using newbs might flock and go back to using windows. then again that might not be too bad

    1. Re:its a sad sad day for some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because nobody clicked on the windows site

  25. Digi-Juke? No, I'm Fine by grunt107 · · Score: 1

    I want the the Ponto digital juke box (or the exclusive placement rights):

    "Digipop can store up to 20,000 tunes (compressed in Ogg Vorbis or MP3) and soon will deliver video-clips, according to Ponto-i owner Andre Dias. Sound and video ports enable venues to connect Digipop to existing sound and TV systems.

    The jukebox includes a wired, remote serial pinpad that can control the machine remotely. For example, a bartender could use the pin pad to add credits to user accounts, which are identified by cards with barcode stickers. Ponto-i sells barcode cards for 50 cents each, printed with the venue's logo."

  26. Fair and impartial by crapnutassneck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am sure that linuxdevices.com will be really fair and impartial in a debate over Linux devices. How much credibility would we all be giving it if it came from Microsoft?

    --
    .-=Wit is educated insolence=-. -Aristotle
    1. Re:Fair and impartial by koi88 · · Score: 1

      Read the first line of the slashdot article:
      "Sister sites LinuxDevices and WindowsForDevices..."

      --

      I don't need a signature.
    2. Re:Fair and impartial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come now. The majority here cannot be bothered to R(let-alone-comprehend)TFA, and you expect someone to RTFH(eadline)?

    3. Re:Fair and impartial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fair and impartial" has nothing to do with this contest. Both Windows and Linux fan(atic)s are being encouraged to show off all the shiny neat things that their OS runs on. Each side has their own website.

      This should be far more entertaining than some scholarly study in a more "impartial" environment.

  27. One of the coolest gadgets: Tomtom GO by MrBoombasticfantasti · · Score: 4, Informative
    I recently got a Tomtom GO navigation system and it is absolutely awesome. Link may be a bit flash heavy.

    It runs Linux and it's miles better (pun intended) than the Windows CE counterpart Tomtom Navigator 3 which has occasional glitches.

    If only it could run *BSD... ;-)

    --
    !ERR: Signature not found.
    1. Re:One of the coolest gadgets: Tomtom GO by stienman · · Score: 1

      Link may be a bit flash heavy.

      Link may be a bit flash heavy? That's like saying high fructose corn syrup may be a bit sweet!

      4MB too big.

      -Adam

    2. Re:One of the coolest gadgets: Tomtom GO by Durrik · · Score: 1

      Especially in a discussion talking about embedded systems. Though people who use flash seem to have no sense of the tightness needed for small bandwidth systems.

      For example: (and I am an embedded programmer, who see functionality, speed, and algorithms as more important then flash) I help run a website for a set of international martial arts games. The webserver sits on an ADSL link, that charges $25/gig over the first gig upstream.

      One of the (new) website developers said: I can make a nice fancy flash image for the first page. It'll be very small.
      the rest of us: how small?
      Him: Only about a meg.

      So 4 megs might not be that heavy afterall. To me its heavy, to anyone who does embedded programming, its heavy. Its just a different mindset.

      But a bit back on topic for the general article. If you look at things, WinCE and Linux are probably too burdensen for most embedded devices. Coming from trying to switch out 7 year old ARM development tools for the GCC 3.3 tool chain I've come to realize that alot of open source stuff isn't going to hit embedded devices until they get more people who are into the small, tight, fast mindset. I was taking a set of code that made a 1.5 meg flash image and trying to get it to compile/link with gnu. With all the size optimizations, strip commands (even more then just doing strip, but taking away whole sections like the .comment section) the final code turned out to be 3.9 megs. When you look at it, the difference in price for a million units of 2 meg flash chips and 4 meg flash chips, didn't justify not spending money on the Arm development system.

      So you aren't going to see linux on the small devices until you can get the gnu tool chain to compile smaller code.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
  28. My fav by doombob · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite embedded device has always been the Windows CE gas station pumps. Because something like pumping gas, ordering Big Macs, and asking for directions all at the same time was just too vital a service for people not to utilize.

    1. Re:My fav by WD_40 · · Score: 1

      Cool, now I can roller blade to the nearest gas pump and haxx0r teh Gibs0n!

      --

      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

    2. Re:My fav by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 1

      My favourite has always been the Windows Cell phones.

      --
      "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
  29. I vote for the web and google by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As the coolest 'gadgets.'

  30. Sharp Zaurus? by Spyro+VII · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, I haven't read the article yet (and by the looks of things I won't be doing it either), but offhand the only thing that I have to say is that I've never seen a Pocket PC that can stack up to the Zaurus line of handhelds made by Sharp, on either the coolness factor or the gadget factor.

    It will be interesting seeing how they weighed the Pocket PC PDAs against the Linux ones, and how the fact that a number of iPaqs can be ran with either PPC or some kind of Linux.

    1. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by TrevorDoom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As I've owned a Zaurus 5500, Tungsten T3, and currently own a HP iPAQ 4155, I definately have to give the "coolness," "gadget," and "power" to the iPAQ hands down.

      User replaceable battery (one of the issues with the Tungsten), 400 MHz XScale processor (whole lot more powerful than the 5500), integrated Bluetooth (more than the Zaurus has) and WiFi (more than the T3 has) and with a couple of third-party apps to "fix" the annoying things about the Pocket PC operating system I'm most definately in love with this iPAQ...

      I'm sorry, the handwriting recognition on the Zaurus sucks (Decuma OnSpot for PocketPC, OTOH is able to decypher my hardly intelligable chicken-scratch) and my fingers are fat enough that trying to use the thumb keyboard is annoying at best. WiFi, while not essential in a PDA, is damn nice (access to the fileshares on the Windows network at work while doing things where a laptop isn't readily accessable but I'm in WiFi range is schweet) and gives me the ability to use Pocket Putty to ssh into my fileserver at home while sitting on the couch.

      The Zaurus has a cool "geek" factor, but really, I got tired of the shitty quality of the PIM apps and fighting with the device to try and get it to sync got old after about 3 weeks.

    2. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I gather if you put the Zaurus SL-6000W against the other two though, that it wouldn't be quite so screwed by the other two. That way you get the 400MHz XScale processor, with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, and the only real problem is the batteries are stupidly hard to find (harder to find than the unit itself, and that is really something!) :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    3. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I've owned an SL-5500 and one of the "ueber k-rad" SL-C760s. The latter wins in the "coolness factor," if you're talking about bringing it to a LUG meeting. But past that? I'd rather use a WinCE (not PocketPC, but real WinCE 3.0 or 4.x) or PalmOS device. At least for now. Sure, the hardware is neat, but when the apps really blow- and the battery life sucks- how cool is it really?

      The VGA screens on the C-series is badass. But then again, you can't really read them in bright sun-light. The hardware is fast- or, at least, it'd be fast if it was running CE. But the Linux and Qtopia software provided makes the thing feel as slow as my Newton MP100 running NewtonOS 1.3. Except the Newton did it a lot better.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine the SL-6000x would make much of a difference. Sure, you can get a wifi card for any other Z. And, if you're willing to have a big ass dongle and software that doesn't work very well, you can have bluetooth too.

      But in the end, the software sucks. Yeah, you can brag all you want about being able to run bash, but I've got a unix shell and a boatload of gnu/unix apps on my CE device. The sigmarion 3, and it has a real keyboard.

      It's really a shame- the Zaurus line could've really been something. Opera and NetFront are both really kick ass browsers. Hell, even the Konq port is pretty slick. But past that, good apps are few and far between, with the big exception beyond the browsers are some of the apps from the Kompany.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by Moskit · · Score: 1
      Geekness/coolness/gadgetness certainly, but Zaurus applications are a misunderstanding. It is not a good PDA. EPOC/Symbian applications are much more elegantly designed.

      It is not enough to have a good OS, it's about the applications...

    6. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Actually, all the reviews I've read (and it's been a lot in the past week, because I need to buy a PDA and I'm doing heavy research) say that software was the main improvement on the 6000* compared to the 5x00*.

      That being said, the 6000* _is_ way overpriced. And the Japanese seem to be paying more for the same model as the US, which is bad when the model I want isn't released anywhere but Japan.

      The only real requirements I have for a device are... PIM features, preferably Qtopia/OPIE support, so that I don't have to wait five years to get sync software which works, and Bluetooth built-in. Wireless is a bonus, but Bluetooth is a requirement as if I'm going to suffer having both a phone _and_ a PDA, the two at least need to talk.

      Combined setups might have been the way to go, but I can't find any of the phones I actually want, anywhere in the world. Go figure that all the best stuff isn't for sale.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    7. Re:Sharp Zaurus? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > if you're willing to have a big ass dongle

      Must... resist... Satan.... Make it up... to him... later...

  31. interface is easy to customize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The portablility of X and access to many widget sets should make linux a breeze to port to any display. Linux and Unix can handle complex user interaction pretty well. The problem would be with dealing with proprietary formats. Even the the Open source community seems to have a good grasp of whatever obfuscation Microsoft or Apple throws out to confuse and capture the consumer (e.g. Samba, Open Office, Gnumeric).

  32. Garmin GPS by Mateito · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I so seriously want one of these that I had to let my fiancee by both a new pair of shoes and a new watch.

    No idea what OS it runs, tho, but I'd be interested if anybody knows.

    1. Re:Garmin GPS by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should take a look at this:

      http://www.garmin.com/products/iQue3200/

    2. Re:Garmin GPS by doombob · · Score: 1

      Usually, their OS's are proprietary. They hire a bunch of Compuer Science majors every year to program this stuff. They were working on a PDA integrated with GPS last year that ran on WinCE, but I don't know if that ever got to market. I think they were considering switching to the PalmOS.

    3. Re:Garmin GPS by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I had to let my fiancee by both a new pair of shoes and a new watch

      She doesn't need a new watch, there's a clock on the stove! {rimshot}

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    4. Re:Garmin GPS by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Interesting that a sexist (not reprimanding, mind you, it was funny) joke got modded insightful.

    5. Re:Garmin GPS by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't purchase anything from them. Support and service are pretty much nonexistent. My then fiance bought one for $799 (package deal) since we where going to Germany. 6 months later, they dropped the price by $300 and we have to buy an external antenna for the thing to even work here. Needless to say, we contacted them several times and nothing has come about of it.

      Garmin is Ok in the states. Out East it works perfect but they have some glitches on the west side of the nation that tell you to turn right when you can only go left, etc. Other than that, its decent. Our next one will be an in the car system with voice prompts. We used one in a rental here and loved it better than our Garmin.

  33. Cable TV by fbrain · · Score: 1

    I believe most cable TV boxes in the UK are running a version of linux.

    TV + Linux = Simpsons, Futurama and many other programs I don't get time to watch.

    --
    Avontech | Play dirty! They started it!
    1. Re:Cable TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fbrain : "I believe most cable TV boxes in the UK are running a version of linux"
      No they are not!
      I know for a fact that NTL for example long ago signed on to a technology agreement with Micrsoft after Microsoft had invested some $500 million in NTL.
      Microsoft entered similar agreements with Telewest as well.
      I have never had any cable TV box that was using Linux.
      If you have, please let us know the name of what cabel TV company you are using, will you?

  34. Mac OS X and Palm? by mysterious_mark · · Score: 1

    Seems like a bit of a waste since the two very best OS's are excluded. But we alternate OS'ers are a smug lot and will refrain from comment, (only grunts of contempt). M

    1. Re:Mac OS X and Palm? by solive1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I can't comment on what other devices use MacOS, but, as far as I know PalmOS is just on PDAs and isn't really a desktop OS ported to other devices. Also, iPod (as I've been reading) doesn't even use an OS designed by Apple. Maybe that's why they were excluded.

    2. Re:Mac OS X and Palm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong 2 os's (not palmOS and MacOS).
      He's talking about amigaOS and BEOS, with freeBSD being an implied third.

    3. Re:Mac OS X and Palm? by davidstrauss · · Score: 1
      as far as I know PalmOS is just on PDAs and isn't really a desktop OS ported to other devices

      Windows CE is neither a port of Windows 9x nor NT. Microsoft created it from the beginning as a mobile OS. Windows CE does, however, power a wider range of devices than Palm OS. Your confusion is understandable. There's more overlap now than ever before between Windows Embedded (desktop/server based) and Windows CE.

  35. Bad Joke by prichardson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since the two quick reference guides aren't loading, I think it's time for Slashdotting jokes to commence. I'll start.

    Too bad their webserver was running on one of those linux phones!

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
  36. hardware support issue ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardware support for commodity PCs and specialized embedded systems means two different things. In an embedded system, you often don't have be compatible with unknown other devices. The embedded driver doesn't necessarily need to be shoved into a particular API. Code written for one implementation can easily be ported to another embedded implementation. The problem is getting a hardware manufacturer to release his source implementation for two reasons : 1) competitors could create a plug-in replaceable hardware component for the driver and 2) Microsoft doesn't like it when their minons aid and assist the Linux enemy. My keeping the driver closed they keep Bill Gates happy.

  37. Hey, mad moderatiing MacZealots !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't handle the truth?

  38. aie aie aie by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Looks like Slashdot put the smack down on linuxdevices.com

    Any mirrors?

  39. Hmmm. Which will be slashdotted first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linuxdevices or slashdot?

  40. Well, looking at those numbers again.... by carlmenezes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looking at the direction mobile phones are moving, I think it's a pretty good possibility that the the PDA, handhelds and Audio/Video Devices of the future will essentially be mobiles phones with these features.

    Adding up the counts in those categories we have :

    Linux : 38+17+36 = 91
    Windows: 74+24+8 = 106

    If you add in the "other" category, you have :

    Linux : 91+38=134
    Windows:106+22=128

    Either way, it's really close, except for one thing - the future trend and the contributions made back to the OSS community as a result of the devices that use Linux.

    The thing is, as more of these devices are released, more code and/or documentation and bugfixes will be released by companies back to the OSS community because they will be using many OSS tools in the development of these products, improving them if necessary in the process and finally releasing some of the improvements to the OSS community.

    This will make it easier for more companies to re-use OSS tools and software and we have a potential cascade effect that could create a very wide development base for embedded Linux devices.

    On the windows side, the situation is not the same - companies usually don't release their any portion of their code into a "public pool" for use by the community.

    This essentially means, that while the numbers are an even split now, it looks like the Linux numbers will grow faster than the Windows numbers.

    Now, also remember that with the devices comes whatever the devices are connected to - namely PCs, Macs and the like. Therefore, at the very minimum, this could lead to a much better awareness of the Linux OS. What follows awareness is usually curiosity - and since Linux is a quality product, curiosity can only be a good thing.

    Therefore, I'd just say that although the numbers are an even split now, they actually represent the success of Linux in the embedded devices market and given time, this will seep into the desktop and that will be a good thing. Competition always is.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:Well, looking at those numbers again.... by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 1

      Looking at the direction mobile phones are moving, I think it's a pretty good possibility that the the PDA, handhelds and Audio/Video Devices of the future will essentially be mobiles phones with these features.

      As long as they don't look like the Nokia N-Gage. =)

      --
      "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
  41. Linux 1 - MS - 0 by Heem · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, considering at this time that the windows site is completely slashdotted, while the linux site is up, just a little slow from the slashdotting........

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  42. Linux powers the TiVo by Wateshay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Game over. Next contest...

    --

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    1. Re:Linux powers the TiVo by javaxman · · Score: 1

      No doubt. Between TiVo and the Mars Rovers, if it's about cool, this game is over.

  43. Re:Still #2 And A Very Cool System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only it could run *BSD... ;-)

    ... then it would be dying!!! (badoom boom)

    Thank you, thank you, I'll be performing here all week!

  44. Nope. by Blob+Pet · · Score: 2, Informative

    It lists the iPaq under Linux devices.

    --
    "...today consumers have been conditioned to think of beer when they see a bullfrog..."
    1. Re:Nope. by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Considering Compaq does support iPaqs with Linux (send a borked install to their Research Lab, and it comes back with Linux), I'd say that it's at least semi-official that Linux runs on iPaqs even if it's not a shipping option. Compaq even hosts handhelds.org and has paid engineers to work on the distros for the iPaq.

      Iffy, sure, but not unreasonable to include iPaqs under both categories as a 'Windows' and 'Linux' device.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Nope. by Noksagt · · Score: 1

      It lists the iPaq under Linux devices.
      So it does. It still misses many devices--most ARM-equipped windows devices such as the Axim will also run it.

  45. Be there! SUNDAY! by jav1231 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We've rounded up 150 of the COOLEST Linux devices from all over the far east! (And...uh..the 1 or 2 available in the U.S.)

  46. Re:Linux 1 - MS - 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even better, both run on Linux/Apache servers, so it's Linux 1 - Linux 0.

  47. Blackberry by neilb78 · · Score: 1

    It think my Blueberry (Blackberry 7510) smacks 'em all down.

    Phone
    Email
    Web
    PDA
    Java

    Yummy. It may be some fork of Linux, but I'm not sure.

    --
    © 2004 The SCO Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  48. the future reveals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whatever the status are now, the open modular architecture of time will tell you what the clock is..

    freespirit

  49. Neither, I would hope by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    For embedded systems, you want simplicity, reliability, and understandability. Neither Linux nor Windows give you these. Sure, Linux is more reliable in certain ways, but we're still talking about a hulking system that's not needed in 99% of embedded devices. And, yes, Linux is "understandable" in that you can get the source code for the hundreds out thousands of lines of code in the kernel, but that makes very little difference. In the typical embedded device, you need an "OS" that's about 4K in size, if that.

    1. Re:Neither, I would hope by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      4K? really? If you are talking about CORE O/S functions like preemptive multi-level tasking, memory and queue management,interrupts, clocks, timers, and thats going to be hard to fit in 4K of memory. Add a file system, device interfaces for I/O like serial or USB and a user interface and you are hitting probably 32K. VxWorks Minimum Kernal Size in something like 500K, a full up OS with a Board Suppor Package can be 32MB. You can cut out what you dont use but its still going to be much bigger than 4K!

    2. Re:Neither, I would hope by tao · · Score: 1

      The "typical" embedded device, think microwave oven, trip computer in a car, etc, does not need USB, preemptive multitasking, etc, and uses a very simplified memory management (in most cases static allocations), since they have absolute control over the running applications. Try not to think of embedded devices as being only handhelds and wifi AP's. It is quite common for embedded systems to run on 8-bit or 16-bit CPUs (even if ARM is probably the most used processor these days for the more CPU demanding systems). 4k is a lot when you write applications for an 8-bit CPU.

    3. Re:Neither, I would hope by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Those sort of things dont really need an OS, a microwave is a glorified timer and could be written in-house on something as simple as a PIC. I think the review is just for PDAs and other geeky gadgets that generally have some real meat inside (heh).

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    4. Re:Neither, I would hope by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      you are talking controllers and timers which don't need an OS..Some of them you don't even program in the sense of source code. ASICs/FPGAs take care of it all.

  50. Weird... by temojen · · Score: 1

    19 windows Thin Clients and No Linux models? Very odd!

    Wait.. VIA-EPIA series boards... never mind... they're just only counting the pre-installed ones.

    1. Re:Weird... by woobieman29 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Very odd indeed.... Especially since at least three of the vendors listed on the Windows side (Wyse, Neoware and Maxspeed) all have Linux products that are almost identical hardware-wise to the Windows offerings. Maxspeed's 3xxx series Linux TC's are built with the exact same VIA EPIA board, and supporting hardware as the 5xxx series Windows CE and 8xxx series Windows XP boxes - the *only* difference is the OS image on the bootable Compact Flash media. You can change OS's on these TC's by simply shutting the unit down and swapping the Compact Flash card, or re-flashing the unit.

      --
      \/\/oobie
  51. Botched link in table by Flower · · Score: 1

    The Linux Gateways, servers, AP link is the same link for Tablets and Webpads. This should be the proper link.

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  52. Obligatory SCO bash by Psymunn · · Score: 2, Funny

    But surely you are worried about having to pay out SCO for each kernel you use...

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  53. Not to be a nitpicker or anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    But if a windows worm causes my car to kill me, I want it to be MyDoom. No offense, but if I'm going to die a horrible screaming death, I think it should at least be ironic.

  54. C'mon! It's easy! by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Just look at the statistics in the table, Windows is in more PDA's and Cell Phones, Linux is in more Robots. What's cooler, a PDA or a Robot? A PDA keeps track of your phone numbers, a robot will push you down the stairs. Linux wins again!

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  55. Ultimate gadget by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Just for fun, how about an all-in-one gadget? Most of the components in things are pretty small so i reckon you could make an all in one GPS, Multi-system mobile phone (including satelite?), Wireless (and Bluetooth and Infrared) Hard-drive, Camera (crappy little one if you have to) and maybe even have room to fit an FM radio and a transmitter and several useful I./O ports. And of course it would run Linux;) and have some essential software - media player, tetris, acoustic modem mode etc.. Afew years ago this would be far fetched but it should be do-able now surely? even if it was the size of an old brick-phone (and hopefully robust and water proof) it would be worth it and judging by the cost of most of the components it wouldnt be totally far-out expensive! I dream that one day I will be able to read slashdot anywhere on the face of the earth for practically no cost..

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  56. Response Headers by marinebane · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seeming as http://windowsfordevices.com/ runs Apache on *nix, they might just be biased. They may be inclined to spoil a good story with the truth.

  57. I think we all know the answer to this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WINDOWS!

  58. Re:Linux 1 - MS - 0 by Heem · · Score: 1

    Just means the windows guys don't know how to setup their servers ;)

    Actually, it appears to me that both may actually be run by the same people. Although it would be easy to check up on that, I didnt do it yet.

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
  59. Tag-team? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, Andre the Giant might have fended off a horde of midget wrestlers. But in the embedded arena, where do PalmOS and Symbian fit into the market share? As a developer, I'm targetting the market that I can best reach. Microsoft's platforms have heavy prices in incompatibility and anticompetitive actions of Microsoft itself. But among its competitors, while Linux might lead, it's not alone. I don't expect "LinuxDevices.com" to cover that dimension of this story, but where are the numbers we can use to get the real big picture for these little platforms?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  60. I made a nuclear plant by Epistax · · Score: 1

    I didn't have licenses for any other software so to stay legit I installed Windows Me. Oh.. what's that?.. ..! Oh god! AH!!--

  61. Flamebait, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can never quite figure out why a moderator would waste perfectly good mod points on posts like the one above. If you follow the links, it's obviously a parody of an earlier posting by the original poster (who is clearly a troll). The kicker is that the post above which accuses the poster of being a child molester and includes the creative word "cuntrag" is not "flamebait" but "off-topic". Slashdot - dontchyaluvvit?

  62. Windows... by CPlusPlusOwnsYou · · Score: 1

    We all know windows is the most stable OS for embedded devices.

    --
    "Software is like sex: it's better when it's free."
  63. Obligatory Simpsons reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and a whacky clipart image of Stone Cold Bill Gates...
    More like:
    Worst clipart image ever.

  64. Why is this Slashdot-worthy? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    Here is a similar comparison:
    Number of Vehicle Models:
    Ford 15
    Rolls Royce 2
    The clear winner in terms of reliablity, availability and overall goodness? Ford

  65. What's the logic behind that... by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 1

    There are no thin clients on the Linux side! I don't get it... last time I heard, LTSP was doing quite well...

  66. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. So it's off topic that the original poster is in fact a cuntrag.

    And the GNAA is in fact the nuts on your neck.

  67. OpenBSD Rules by billstewart · · Score: 1

    FR3D MB0G0 says "Linux? Not! Can't preserve Three Laws if anybody can modload a new kernel driver into their heads. You need something really secure like OpenBSD! Just look at this videocam mounted on PDP1 K3n0b3, who's running Linux 2.2 and wuFTPd. You can clearly see the shadow of the chainsaw on the back of your head there... That'd never happen if he were running OpenBSD."

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks