Slashdot Mirror


Googling Behind China's Great Firewall

xcham writes "The OpenNet Initiative, a joint project of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto, the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School, and the Advanced Network Research Group at Cambridge, have released a bulletin regarding the type of filtering applied to Google by the Chinese government. Most notably, certain keywords are filtered, as well as Google's 'cache' function. More information on how the keyword filtering is implemented is available in a previous bulletin."

344 comments

  1. I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I not noticed any filtered . Life in China is and great, and we talk not blocked. I slashdot!

    1. Re:I'm behind the by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

      Really? Why is it that I can never access the San Jose Mercury news web site when I am in China, regardless of where the connection originates from?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:I'm behind the by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well that explains the speech of new Chinese immigrants! They're still suffering from post-filtering syndrome!

      "I no you! Understand?" ;-P

    3. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems you lack some sense of humour! You've been staying in China for a too long time...

    4. Re:I'm behind the by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pidgin English is too similar to filtered English.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:I'm behind the by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I meme coming.

      do think cute?

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    6. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Chinese people, I can't understand you, with your Ching Chang Chong!

    7. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute, yes...in Japan!!!

    8. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Rick James, bitch!

    9. Re:I'm behind the by nkh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chinese (mandarin) is not the most difficult language to understand in a conversation. The difficult part is to speak it. Japanese is easier to speak (from a french background).

    10. Re:I'm behind the by timts · · Score: 1

      support
      I remember reading something that USA has internet filter as well

    11. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the heck is unixbox filtered? :/

    12. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not one that applies to everyone. Some groups/individuals may have them.

    13. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love to learn Chinese, any Chinese, but the "5 ways to pronounce this syllable and they all mean something wildly different" is a little intimidating from an American speaker of English and some German.

      Having nothing in common with my native language could make it easier I suppose, there aren't the overlap and "gotchas" that there are when you go from say a "douche" in Germany to a "douche" in America.

    14. Re:I'm behind the by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative
      The BBC is blocked as well.

      As an aside, I set up a simple unencrypted squid proxy on a box in the USA, and whenever I encounter "the block", I just hit F12-x in Opera, and reload the site. The simplest of proxies will defeat the Great Firewall.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you havent noticed anything being filtered!

      If the filters are working as intended, you will never even know that some thousands of restricted sites even exist! So if you are not aware of the existance of these "bad" websites, how can you ever 'know' that they are being blocked from your viewing? ...nice english. i guess the government is blocking language translators too.

    16. Re:I'm behind the by xyr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      im currently behind the Great Firewall and without a proxy i can access most of the sites i usually visit: nytimes, the post, guardian, der spiegel, newsweek, grouphug o.O & co., scmp and of course /. with this story. also, other good things that will get you around the wall (and that i am also normally using at home) are p2p software and freenet. and for your IM needs, use trillian with encryption, nothing will be blocked.

    17. Re:I'm behind the by marktwen0 · · Score: 1
      grouphug o.O & co., scmp and

      What is o.O & co.?

    18. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so learn japanese! just as cool as chinese, but without the confusion of "eat food" sounding almost the same as "eat s***"

    19. Re:I'm behind the by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Their English is better than your Chinese, I'm sure ;)

    20. Re:I'm behind the by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      'Tis true. Every time I try to speak Mandarin for "Thank you", they just look at me without the slightest clue what I'm saying. That's despite the fact that it sounds exactly the same to me when they say it. :-(

    21. Re:I'm behind the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. BBC News is blocked. But most of their other services, like TV schedules and weather reports, come through fine.

  2. They'll never even see this?! by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

    They will never have the freedom to see a bunch of fucking shitty sex that will help them be free to have incest while reading Playboy in the Bermuda Triangle!

    Triangle Man beats Firewall man!

    1. Re:They'll never even see this?! by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Parent is making a joke that because of his use of filtered words in his post this page will be filtered and will not be seen in china. Its a joke not a troll. Aparently the mods use a similar filter and mod down posts containing obscenities regardles of their pertinence to the discussion.

    2. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aparently the mods use a similar filter and mod down posts containing obscenities regardles of their pertinence to the discussion.

      Or perhaps some people are sick of garcia's continual karmawhoring.

    3. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'll admit that it wasn't funny enough to deserve a funny mod but still isn't a troll. Complaining about karma whores is worse than karma whoring itself. I find nothing wrong with it if the person contributes to the discussion. If its crap ignore it. And BTW funny mods don't count twoards karma
      from the slashdot faq

    4. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could be the case as well.

    5. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma whoring? How about intelligent posting? If you don't like what I have to say set me as a Foe -5.

      At least when I post something it is well thought out and researched, it isn't some uneducated fuckwit comment that has no bearing on the on-topic discussion (ie your bullshit post).

    6. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma whoring? How about intelligent posting? If you don't like what I have to say set me as a Foe -5.

      Yeah, I'm going to bother to get an account just so I can manipulate the slashview. I, among others, think you karmawhore. Deal. BTW, too chickenshit to reply using your actual account?

      At least when I post something it is well thought out and researched, it isn't some uneducated fuckwit comment that has no bearing on the on-topic discussion (ie your bullshit post).

      Nice language and reckless, baseless accusation. "Well thought out", eh?

    7. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm going to bother to get an account just so I can manipulate the slashview. I, among others, think you karmawhore. Deal. BTW, too chickenshit to reply using your actual account?

      Chickenshit? If anything it would be "Karmawhoring" because it's Insightful as any other post here and would be deserving of a straight shot to +5.

    8. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chickenshit? If anything it would be "Karmawhoring" because it's Insightful as any other post here and would be deserving of a straight shot to +5.

      No, it would be blatently offtopic and modded down as so, hence your cowardice. Heh, you even pay to be on this site. Sad, really.

    9. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you even pay to be on this site. Sad, really.

      As you can see my UID is rather low which means I have been a part of this site for quite sometime... It would be really sad if I utilized what this site had to offer and did not pay.

    10. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you can see my UID is rather low which means I have been a part of this site for quite sometime...

      I've been on this site since it was Rob's hobby project running on a single Alpha box. It was a cool site then. Today it is shit.

      It would be really sad if I utilized what this site had to offer and did not pay.

      This site has nothing to offer but a bunch of think-they-are-smart geeks whining about Microsoft and whoring themselves for Apple. Slashdot has deteriorated into a lame mockery of itself. Its only quality is the sheer number of troll biters.

    11. Re:They'll never even see this?! by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 2, Funny

      This site has nothing to offer but a bunch of think-they-are-smart geeks whining about Microsoft and whoring themselves for Apple. I don't know about the "whoring themselves for Apple" part, but the Microsoft hatred is very strong. One day, back when I was still using windows and word, word crashed one time too many because I moved a text box from point A to point B. I cried out to the tech gods, "There must be an easier way" and of course I turned to google to find another way. (All hail Linux). This story is too long at this point, and the post doesn't really matter anyway, but I'll speed things along here. In a moment of extreme frustration I typed into the google search bar "Microsft SUX". The very first search result was a post here at slashdot. I joined up and have been here at least once a day ever since. (Penguins are sexy wise beasts, Amen).

    12. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gayest. Post. Ever.

    13. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be gay would be me saying I wanted to suck your dick. But then I would get modded down because most geeks are raging homophobes.

      Well, fuck that - I'm PROUD of my sexual orientation and anyone who doesn't like it can bite my shiny metal ass! I've been here longer than most of you (look, once again, at my UID) so I'm sick of all the newbies who think they can judge me.

    14. Re:They'll never even see this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been here longer than most of you (look, once again, at my UID) so I'm sick of all the newbies who think they can judge me.

      It's a bit hard to look at your UID when you are posting anonymously, fuckwad. Anyone's length of time on this site is irrelevant. Posts that do nothing more than step in tune with the Slashdot groupthing are equally lame regardless of the user. People who "contribute" to this slagheap of a website as if it's contributing to the greater knowledge of the world will be judged for their sins.

  3. tunneling by Raleel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet those in the know get a free shell account in another country and ssh tunnel all their web traffic through it.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:tunneling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they filter all binary connections and only allow ASCII characters?

    2. Re:tunneling by secolactico · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bet those in the know get a free shell account in another country and ssh tunnel all their web traffic through it.

      ... because a high volume of encrypted traffic would never attract the attention of the authorities...

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:tunneling by t0c · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually if you RTFA you'll see that they filter HTTP GET requests using packet sniffing... then they just send a reset packet effectivily killing access.

    4. Re:tunneling by Shisha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Read the parent please! SSH tunneling means that the even "HTTP GET" will come accros as something totally garbled. Whether they'll come after you, just because of encrypted connection, or whether they found a way of cracking SSH on the fly is another question (unlikely thought).

      BUT! They're not bothered. If a few geeks read forbidden stuff, that won't change much. I'm sure there's already dissident minority. What they don't want is some critical mass of people getting the wrong idea. Which won't happen for a while, because most Chineese haven't seen a PC. On the other the peasants never really mattered in China, so maybe they (Chineese government) have a good reason to be paranoid.

    5. Re:tunneling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but a higher volume of several hundrends of encrypted channels will never get any chinese super-cluster to decrypt it or their attention to arrest them all.

      Of course that would maybe mean other more severe acts of cencorship like banning of the 22 port altogether or even banning certain users to access the internet.

    6. Re:tunneling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Yes, but a higher volume of several hundrends of encrypted channels will never get any chinese super-cluster to decrypt it or their attention to arrest them all.

      How about sending out several hundred spies to trojan those pcs, or installing hardware bugs - a camera?

    7. Re:tunneling by bfields · · Score: 1
      I bet those in the know get a free shell account in another country and ssh tunnel all their web traffic through it.

      ... because a high volume of encrypted traffic would never attract the attention of the authorities...

      Most ssh users don't use it as a way to avoid censorship--they use it to e.g. keep their passwords secret. Do they have no script kiddies in China?

      --Bruce Fields

    8. Re:tunneling by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Most ssh users here [in the US] don't use it as a way to avoid censorship, because we don't have to (except for the Olympics, of course). But if we were in China, we would (at least I would, unless I was afraid of getting cought).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:tunneling by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      ... because a high volume of encrypted traffic would never attract the attention of the authorities...


      What about using steganography to create an VPN tunnel? Perhaps this already has been done...

      For example:
      1) An application makes an HTTP connection to www.DearLeader.com., and downloads pictures of Kim Il Sung--likely not content the censors would be very concerned about.

      2) Server and client side applications encrypt/decrypt data into the pictures.

      3) Visit a different website a few minutes later.

      Sure--you'd probably end up with a 56k virtual connection while using broadband, but your motives are safer...

    10. Re:tunneling by bfields · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Most ssh users here [in the US] don't use it as a way to avoid censorship, because we don't have to.

      OK. My only point is just that if I were, say, a Chinese geek setting up a linux box, ssh would probably be one of the first things I'd install and use, for the same reasons it's one of the first things I install here. So there are probably plenty of people using ssh there for the usual stuff--logging into their server to check their mail, encrypting a remote X session, etc.

      Thus I'm questioning the claim that Chinese authorities could use the presence of encrypted traffic to find censorship-circumventors. Such traffic could very well be lost in the bulk of everyday VPN and ssh traffic.

      Though of course sufficiently sophisticated traffic analysis might still be a threat. (E.g. it might be possible to recognize that a bunch of ssh traffic to an outside site has packets whose size and timing looks like ssh-tunneled http traffic from mozilla).

      --Bruce Fields

    11. Re:tunneling by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's true. What I was really trying to say, though, is that (based on my usage) only a few percent of my communicating is encrypted. If I were in China, and went from having 5% encrypted to 100% encrypted, I think they'd be able to notice.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    12. Re:tunneling by amerinese · · Score: 1

      hey, this is off topic, i know, but i take issue with: "On the other the peasants never really mattered in China..."

      um... can we say COMMUNIST REVOLUTION? seriously, the whole reason mao succeeded is because he got the support of the people.

      on topic--here's an example of how weak the filtering is in some ways. a friend of mine tells me that Taiwan's president, "Chen Shuibian [in Chinese of course]" is blocked on Google, but this is easily circumvented by simply searching for "Chen Shui".

      you can probably think of many ways of circumventing IM filtering or google filtering as well.

  4. And the /. effect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...will essentailly "censor" the report too. Whee!

    1. Re:And the /. effect... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > ...will essentailly "censor" the report too. Whee!

      Yeah, but before the site goes down, we'll all know how to swear in Chinese! W00t!

    2. Re:And the /. effect... by freakmn · · Score: 1

      I'm still sitting here trying to figure out how to pronounce |

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    3. Re:And the /. effect... by freakmn · · Score: 1

      And I'm also trying to figure out how to get it to show up... ??|? this ???|?\ing copy and paste thing!

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  5. We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As our tests below indicate, China blocks access to the Google cache and to searches that contain certain keywords

    I can't help but wonder how long until this begins to happen in the US, all in the name of fighting terrorism

    1. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before we start blocking keywords, we'll need the giant firewall. Good luck.

    2. Re:We're next by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't care about viruses, worms, trojans, MPAA/RIAA funded relgulations in the government, political parties, voting/e-voting, wars, etc, but they do care about something...

      And that something is the freedom to view porn. Once the US government decides that it is acceptable to expand their reaches to cover the indecency of porn on the net people WILL get pissed off enough to end that bullshit.

    3. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can't help but wonder how long until this begins to happen in the US, all in the name of fighting terrorism

      I can't help but wonder when you and your ilk will stop saying this in every article.

    4. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe when the government stops taking away our rights.

    5. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After having viewed some snippets of the Republican convention, and understanding that about 50% of the American public will vote for that party, I tend to believe that the avarage American will be too clueless for that.

    6. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe when the government stops taking away our rights.

      Name one right the government has taken away from you in the last 4 years.

    7. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you read the Patriot Act?

    8. Re:We're next by Wehesheit · · Score: 1

      some sort of Great fireWALL?

      --
      This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
    9. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one right the government has taken away from you in the last 4 years.

      Have you read the Patriot Act?


      That is not an answer to my question. Name one right.

    10. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't help but wonder how long until this begins to happen in the US, all in the name of fighting terrorism

      Sure, why should we talk about the reality of China when we can talk about your self-dramatizing paranoid fantasies instead! A sense of proportion is way overrated, anyway.

    11. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right to live my life knowing that the government can't detain me indefinitely. I no longer have that right post-9/11/PATRIOT Act.

    12. Re:We're next by nanter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That is not an answer to my question. Name one right.

      The right to due process of law as granted in the 5th Amendment.

      Want more to be listed, smart guy?

    13. Re:We're next by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      That is not an answer to my question. Name one right.

      MikeMacK would have replied, but his right to free speech has been taken away.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    14. Re:We're next by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Many tinfoil hatters said the same thing when Disney refused to distribute F9/11 by Moore, yet that movie had the best opening for a documentry.

      Tinfoil hatters also yelled censorship when the U.S. news outlets declined to air the beheadings enough though a simple web search turns up tons of websites with the footage.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    15. Re:We're next by LoveMuscle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Name one right the government has taken away from you in the last 4 years. How about the fourth amendment. Go read the patriot act section 213 for more.

    16. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, since you obviously have not read it (like most members of Congress). How about my right to privacy. The government, for whatever reasons they choose, can wiretap my phone, find out what I read at the library. How about my right to a fair and quick trial - they again can detain me without cause - just because my name is not Abdul does not mean that it won't happen. Wake up.

    17. Re:We're next by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > As our tests below indicate, China blocks access to the Google cache and to searches that contain certain keywords
      >
      > I can't help but wonder how long until this begins to happen in the US, all in the name of fighting terrorism

      The proper thing for the government to do is to allow its citizens access to the content... and to log all the traffic instead.

      You're free to read whatever you want. Most people Googling for sensitive topics are merely researching them. If your clickstream indicates otherwise, then it's time for the hammer to come down.

      I can think of a few books that have effectively (and possibly for good reason) disappeared from library shelves and retreated to professors' bookshelves in recent times. One title from 30 years ago comes to mind. (No, I don't own a copy.)

      Googling for that title is just fine. If I were still studying that field, I'd sure as hell be leery of buying a copy online, though :)

    18. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      search on american google (google.com) for kazaa lite

    19. Re:We're next by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Actually, individual segments of a vocal population push the censoring/outlawing...and they do it one small bit at a time.

      Think about it...did you know that rifled air-pressure-powered pellet guns are considered firearms in Michigan?

      I've been told there's legislation in the works to prohibit the sale of firearms used in a war. Meaning M16s, sure. But that also includes WWI-era Springfield rifles and 18th and 19th century muzzleloaders.

      The appropriateness of either measure depends on your involvement with various aspects of the issue. But with every measure comes someone's justification. (Whose validity also depends on your involvement with the issue...)

      (Someone's bound to correct or clarify on these points...consider it welcome. IANAE.)

    20. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      And why would we want to talk about the reality here in the US when it's so much easier to just march lockstep with the rest of the sheep.

    21. Re:We're next by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1st adm via campaign finance reforms. Look what Bush and Kerry say about 527's.

      Corps paying for the convention and all the closed door parties at it is OK but if normal people spend their personal money it's a crime.

      Tell me how that makes sense.

    22. Re:We're next by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      They tried that. It was ruled unconstitutional, violating freedom of speech.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    23. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't help but wonder how long until this begins to happen in the US, all in the name of fighting terrorism

      More likely "under the guise of"

    24. Re:We're next by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      I often hope while reading /. that the Tinfoil Hat Brigade is right. I mean at least they will be the first to be silenced, then I wont have to listed to them anymore, and I can read /. sans all the conspiracy theories and communist America predictions....

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    25. Re:We're next by Viceice · · Score: 1

      Watch PBS' "American Pron". http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/porn /

      you can watch it.

      Aparently, if 9/11 didn't happen, Bush's war on terrorism would be a war on pron.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    26. Re:We're next by Lorean · · Score: 1, Funny

      Slashdot needs a 'paranoid' modding option.

    27. Re:We're next by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      people who's little world gets offended easily by such pictures/footage don't go into the net specifially looking for them.. it's just sensible from the army/gov viewpoint to censor things like that and it's not that surprising(and there's not too many news stations that would like to make their viewers feel offended by showing stuff like that).

      anyways, just show the nipple and make a huge fuss over it so you don't have to discuss ugly things(and lets face it, if you can't show a fucking nipple accidentally in whats supposed to be an erotic dance display it would be quite far fetched for a beheading to be 'ok')..

      f9/11 though.. disney could have made gobs of money with that.. but then again it would be more disney'ish to produce a drama movie about the events 20 years later.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    28. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Funny

      I didn't know Herr Ashcroft was a regular /. reader? I've almost been modded down to TROLL. I hope Guantanomo has internet access, I'll miss /.

    29. Re:We're next by Johnnienumlock5 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that protestors of Bush are secretly hidden away whenever he makes an appearence. All you have to do is look "the wrong way" and you are taken to a fenced area sometimes miles away from the speech. I know, I was there.

      --
      http://www.users.muohio.edu/reamsjp/donate.html
    30. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Only if we also get "right-wing nut" mod too.

    31. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing happened in the democratic convention.

    32. Re:We're next by psidon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The proper thing for the government to do is to allow its citizens access to the content... and to log all the traffic instead. You're free to read whatever you want. Most people Googling for sensitive topics are merely researching them. If your clickstream indicates otherwise, then it's time for the hammer to come down.

      And what would you use to define a "clickstream" that should trigger the hammer to come down?? That's still invasion of privacy if you ask me. What I look at is my own business. If it's criminal, that's one thing, but tracking what everyone does all the time and then waiting to pounce is ridiculously invasive IMO.

    33. Re:We're next by plover · · Score: 2, Informative
      rifled air-pressure-powered pellet guns are considered firearms in Michigan

      Most people who hear the words "air rifle" remember the lever action Daisy B-B guns, and they remember B-B gun battles with their friends. The worst anyone ever went home with was a stinging bruise, (no, Mom, nobody put their eye out) and everyone had a great time.

      Modern air rifles are nothing like those B-B guns. Compare the Daisy to my rifled RWS Diana 350 which fires a pellet at 1250 fps. You can even buy actual rimfire .22 caliber ammo that isn't that fast. Believe me when I say that I would NOT want to get shot by this springer. It's a great varmint gun -- very quiet and powerful enough to kill small game. But don't confuse it with the toys of your childhood.

      I can certainly understand why Michigan would consider it to be in the same class as a firearm. It performs substantially the same tasks.

      --
      John
    34. Re:We're next by vgaphil · · Score: 1

      They are working on the first amendment as we speak....

      --
      A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
    35. Re:We're next by RWerp · · Score: 1

      I've been told there's legislation in the works to prohibit the sale of firearms used in a war. Meaning M16s, sure. But that also includes WWI-era Springfield rifles and 18th and 19th century muzzleloaders.

      It is easy to render a rifle unusable. If someone collects this stuff for reasons of historical interest, he doesn't need to shoot from it (and most propably won't, because his precious item might blow up, taking a large part of his arm with it). Just make it illegal to sell usable rifles used in war.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    36. Re:We're next by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Many tinfoil hatters said the same thing when Disney refused to distribute F9/11 by Moore, yet that movie had the best opening for a documentry.

      Disney is a private company, not a civil liberties group. It has the freedom (as in freedom) to decide which movies it likes to distribute, and which not. It's for their shareholders to decide whether it was a good move or not.

      Tinfoil hatters also yelled censorship when the U.S. news outlets declined to air the beheadings enough though a simple web search turns up tons of websites with the footage.

      Freedom of speech also has its limits, like the respect for the dead and their families.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    37. Re:We're next by RWerp · · Score: 1

      I can think of a few books that have effectively (and possibly for good reason) disappeared from library shelves and retreated to professors' bookshelves in recent times. One title from 30 years ago comes to mind. (No, I don't own a copy.)

      I thought that "Mein Kampf" was published earlier.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    38. Re:We're next by RWerp · · Score: 2, Informative

      and I can read /. sans all the conspiracy theories and communist America predictions....

      s/communist/fascist

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    39. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beleive section 213 allows for the delay of the notification of a seizure under a warrant.

      For reference:

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      I don't see how delaying the notification of the execution of a warrant takes away from its grounding in probable cause or specificity of scope as defined in Ammendment IV.

    40. Re:We're next by Peyna · · Score: 2, Funny

      1250 fps? Talk about overkill, I'm usually happy with about 40-60.

      --
      What?
    41. Re:We're next by Peyna · · Score: 1

      527's are pumped full of money by large corporations as well; because they are allowed to accept unlimited amounts of money and basically side-step the issue of CFR.

      The Supreme Court already decided the First Amendment issue as it applies to CFR (for the most part) last year. Namely, that it is necessary in order to reduce real or apparent corruption in the government to restrict freedom of speech. It isn't being done to silence people as much as it is being done in order to protect our democracy from corruption by corporations and other groups.

      --
      What?
    42. Re:We're next by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Funny how 'CFR' didn't address unlimited donations by corps for parties, conventions and travel. I know that travel has 'limits' but having to pay the cost of a first class tick to get the use of a private jet that costs 2000 USD per hour to fly isn't right.

      CFR wasn't and isn't about reforming CF it is about keeping those currently in the power structure where they are and ensuring that any upstarts can not compete on an even playing field. Just look at how hard the two main parties fight to keep 3rd parties off the ballot.

    43. Re:We're next by Peyna · · Score: 1

      John McCain is one of the leaders behind CFR, and I believe his motives are genuine. Oddly enough, the case that I mentioned was basically Republicans and Democrats both trying to get major provisions of the BCRA declared unconstitutional. (The Act was drafted by McCain and Feingold.)

      --
      What?
    44. Re:We're next by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No, they are not. He didn't do anything to ban any of the things in my above post nor has he done anything since to have them banned. CFR is like the tax code, it is large and complicated because of so many loopholes.

    45. Re:We're next by Trent05 · · Score: 1

      And why would we want to talk about the reality here in the US when it's so much easier to just march lockstep with the rest of the sheep.

      What the hell are you talking about? How has your life changed since the introduction of the Patriot ACT? I'm not a big fan but it hasn't stopped me from going to the library or voicing my opinion on anything. Do you REALLY think you have to live off the grid and hide from police??

      I LOVE /.

      I blame Dubya for 9/11.
      But I oppose anything he does to prevent another terrorist attack.

      New York is not treating the protesters fairly.
      China is Communist, therefore noware near as evil as the US. *cough* tiananmen square *cough*

      Bush - "If I knew back then what I know now, I would've still made the decision to invade Iraq." - He's a hate-mongering dictator!!
      Kerry - "If I knew back then what I know now, I still would've authorized the use of force against Iraq." - He's our man!!

      While I'm burning Karma - Howard Dean lost the election when he told a Iowa citizen that "George Bush is NOT my neighbor.", telling the guy to sit down and shut up a few moments later probably didn't help either. Most Democrats don't have a blind hatred for the guy like some people seem to have. Most of my friends are Democrats and don't like dubya, but they understand he's not some religous crusader trying to take over the world.

      Celebrity Activism - Hmmm, Papa Roach is going to vote for X, maybe I should too.

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    46. Re:We're next by mikael · · Score: 1

      1250 fps? Talk about overkill, I'm usually happy with about 40-60.

      How else are you going to shoot those pesky vermin in the fields around your farm, while remaining in your computer chair and reading slashdot at the same time? I just hope the BB gun comes with a laser sight and zoom lens (both pointing towards the target).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    47. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name one right the government has taken away from you in the last 4 years. ... That is not an answer to my question. Name one right.

      How about the right to remain silent? As of this summer, states may now pass laws saying the police can demand that you identify yourself at any time and for no reason. If you refuse, you can be jailed and fined.

      The fact that you may have done absolutely nothing wrong or even suspicious is no longer good enough to preserve your anonymity on the street. How's that for a right lost to fear, uncertainly, and doubt?

    48. Re:We're next by MrDomino · · Score: 1

      Offhand, the right to keep and bear arms--infringed upon (something the Constitution was pretty explicit about not allowing) by the ban on automatic and semi-automatic weapons. That's not the last four years, though. Yeah, in general, things more recently have been more about restricting and setting limitations on freedom than about explicit removal of rights, though that's another thing that's been done on more or less a regular basis since the end of World War II and the creation of the National Security Act of 1947.

    49. Re:We're next by globalar · · Score: 1

      What's most disconcerting is that such legislation as the Patriot Act was approved by elected officials. Said representatives are intended to provide some balance between the people and the state (ideally moderate law). If that balance is disrupted by outside influences and major events, then this radical reaction may become endemic.

      That is, this is not an isolated event of corruption or total control, but possibly a trend.

    50. Re:We're next by MikeMacK · · Score: 0
      How has your life changed since the introduction of the Patriot ACT?

      It has, but probably in a good way - I watch politics much more closely than I used too. No, I don't fear for my life or think the library police are coming for me. But the fact that we are even having this conversation tells you that a lot of people (not all people) are concerned about what our government is doing in the name of "protecting" us. I don't blame W for 9/11. I think the protesters are doing a great job in New York. I think Kerry has the wrong position on the war - I'm not a Democrat - but I'm also not a Republican. What I meant about my comment about marching in lock step like sheep is that most conservatives tend to back "their guys" to the exclusion of all else - like the Limbaugh ditto heads - their philosophy seems to be go along with the crowd, don't question and attack anyone who disagrees.

    51. Re:We're next by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Nah, copyright infringment is a greater threat to America than terrorists.

      Google has already be hit with quite a few DMCA notices to censor links to certain websites. For example check this Google page and scroll to the bottom:
      In response to a complaint we received under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 1 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint for these removed results.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    52. Re:We're next by jonwil · · Score: 1

      no, they would just force search engines, ISPs and so on to block for them.
      And anyone who doesnt comply with the new rules gets sent to that place in cuba with all the barbed wire and stuff.

    53. Re:We're next by Idealius · · Score: 1

      It's so they can win.

      They can't help the people they represent and try to make the changes the people want unless the representative wins.

      Haven't you realized that offending someone is the quickest way for to get people not to support you? The more specific/personal/REAL a representative gets, the more they risk offending a certain voter-base for themselves.

      It's that simple.

      @_@

    54. Re:We're next by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% on the "Disney can do what it wants with its own private company" point.

      > Freedom of speech also has its limits, like the respect for the dead and their families.

      AARGH! Hell no it doesn't have limits; or at least not for the reason you mention! I have the right to publicly make fun of anyone who died in the WTC, insult any military personnel alive or dead -- any person at all, regardless of the status of their brainwaves. RESPECT IS NOT MANDATED BY THE GOVERNMENT! I choose not to do those things out of respect, but to claim that I do not have the right to voice my opinion just because someone might be offended is MORE OFFENSIVE than the opinion itself!

      This is a far cry from yelling "Fire!" in a theatre. There is no threat to public safety because I may choose to disrespect someone who happens to be dead at the time. Not "speaking ill of the dead" is a joke. If a person acted like a jerk, I'm not going to call them an angel just because they died. I'll just say -- to myself, out of respect for their family, not because of the law -- "thank goodness I don't have to listen to his crap any more" and move on.

    55. Re:We're next by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I can think of a few books that have effectively (and possibly for good reason) disappeared from library shelves

      If you don't mind, could you be a bit more specific?

    56. Re:We're next by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I hope Guantanomo has internet access

      Internet access? It barely has bathroom access...

    57. Re:We're next by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 1
      Q That is not an answer to my question. Name one right.

      A The right to due process of law as granted in the 5th Amendment.

      Want more to be listed, smart guy?

      OK, supposedly smart guy...

      Name one right that cannot now be circumvented by the Patriot Act and didn't apply to you anyway if you were of color, wearing a turban or veil, or using a laptop outside a library?

    58. Re:We're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suffice it to say that it was not a work of philosophy or fiction :)

    59. Re:We're next by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Suffice it to say that it was not a work of philosophy or fiction

      A dictionary? A Biography? Science textbooks?

    60. Re:We're next by rand()0 · · Score: 1
      I don't see how delaying the notification of the execution of a warrant takes away from its grounding in probable cause or specificity of scope as defined in Ammendment IV.

      Probably cause (before the warrant is actually issued) can be as simple as "we think you're hiding something" or "you look suspicious". Once they search your house, one of three things can happen:

      1) They find nothing, and lie about the probable cause.

      2) They find nothing substantial, confiscate something harmless and misinterpret how you intended to use it.

      3) They find something incriminating, whether or not it was what they were looking for.

      In any case, they can backdate the warrant with whatever they found in the house, and we're in a guilty-until-proven-innocent state.

      --
      It takes 7 less muscles to smile than to frown. The rest of you are just lazy.
    61. Re:We're next by rand()0 · · Score: 1

      On the subject of my last post, I forgot to mention that they could already do that, because they're already lying about the warrant, so they could lie about showing the warrant to you before searching your house, but now any claims of "they didn't have a warrant" are nullified.

      --
      It takes 7 less muscles to smile than to frown. The rest of you are just lazy.
  6. Proxy by cuban321 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Question: What's stops someone from doing SSH forwarding to a US box, or using a US proxy?

    1. Re:Proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing, it's pretty common.

    2. Re:Proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer: if the "information retrieval" folks in China are handy enough, they just block all ip addresses with known proxies, and do random packet searches for banned phrases, at the backbone servers, right?

    3. Re:Proxy by so-logical · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fear of punishment? Tanks?

    4. Re:Proxy by hasdikarlsam · · Score: 2, Informative

      A private shell account isn't an open proxy, and you can't search SSH connections.

      It's encrypted, you know.

    5. Re:Proxy by KoolDude · · Score: 1


      Question: What's stops someone from doing SSH forwarding to a US box, or using a US proxy?

      Answer: Because everyone wants to run BitTorrent in the background.

      --
      getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
    6. Re:Proxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting put in jail, or worse, possibly for my family too.

      That would be enough to make me not want to do that. Some random computer search, they might find me.

  7. Impressive by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Damn impressive proof of concept for the US/UK governments. Lets hope they don't get any ideas. There are already some laws in place that prevent US citizens from viewing foreign content, concerning security patches etc. on some foreign software. Perhaps they could use the chinese method for filtering that out or any other unlikable for that matter.

    1. Re:Impressive by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      "There are already some laws in place that prevent US citizens from viewing foreign content, concerning security patches etc. on some foreign software."

      Wow, that's news to me. Sources please?

    2. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think he's piling some additional confusion on top of Alan Cox's already nonsensical claims that revealing the details of security patches is illegal under the DMCA.

    3. Re:Impressive by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      If you try to access Showtime from outside the US, you get this:

      "We at Showtime Online express our apologies; however, these pages are intended for access only from within the United States."

      Why? Are they producing some super sekrit content that is not supposed to be seen by non-Americans?

      I really want to know because I don't think my life can go on without seeing their site.

    4. Re:Impressive by Lazyhound · · Score: 1
      There are already some laws in place that prevent US citizens from viewing foreign content, concerning security patches etc. on some foreign software.
      Could you elaborate on that?
    5. Re:Impressive by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
      Some have asked me to elaborate on:

      There are already some laws in place that prevent US citizens from viewing foreign content, concerning security patches etc. on some foreign software.

      The DMCA is one instance of a law that prohibits import of certain types of software(this includes source code, which should be considered free speech), specifically that which circumvents copyright protection on digital media. What I was originally refering to with security patches had to do with the laws that govern encryption strength and export(which also restrict import, usually at the same strength). I remember an article which unfortunately I am unable to find which was discussing how a security patch that was released(forget what for, possibly openbsd) would fall under this category and that such a law prohibited importing its source but somehow allowed it in binary form. If I find the article ill post a link as a reply.

  8. This is insane by savagedome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The keywords include 'paper', 'triangle' and 'simple'??
    Talk about censorship going out of control.

    Well, atleast they can search for 'cthulhu' ;)

    1. Re:This is insane by grazzy · · Score: 1

      its almost like echelon, "bearded middle east man" probably grants you a "go directly to prison"-card.

    2. Re:This is insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, China has shown those damned filthy origami practitioners that it will not stand idly by while they create [CENSORED] swans!

    3. Re:This is insane by bobbozzo · · Score: 3, Informative
      The keywords include 'paper', 'triangle' and 'simple'??
      Talk about censorship going out of control.

      Triangle Boy is/was a anonymous, encrypted proxy system that had a distributed structure. Anyone could run one, and publish it's IP. I think you can understand why the Chinese gov't would want to block people from finding it.

      I don't know if it still exists, but Google brings up lots of (old) links.

      Personally, I use SSH to tunnel to a remove private Squid proxy to get around evil corporate firewalls/filtering. I don't know if SSH would work from within China or not though. It would probably be dreadfully slow though.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    4. Re:This is insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Paper Football can be a dangerous sport.

    5. Re:This is insane by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      its almost like echelon, "bearded middle east man" probably grants you a "go directly to prison"-card.

      Except that it doesn't. If you get flagged by Echelon, that usually just results in a black Chevy Impala outside your house for a few months before they figure out that you're nobody. They're worse than they used to be, but it's not like they're StaSi...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:This is insane by grazzy · · Score: 1

      How would you know? Did you try it? I dare you.

    7. Re:This is insane by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, atleast they can search for 'cthulhu' ;)

      heh. Everyone deserves the opportunity to be devoured first.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:This is insane by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How would you know? Did you try it? I dare you.

      I used to work in intelligence for the US Army. The first thing you do is filter out the crap (e.g. random losers saying "bearded middle east man") so you don't waste limited resources chasing dead ends. Believe it or not, intelligence professionals look at context. In fact, context often gives produces better intelligence than the initial flag. Contrary to the beliefs evinced by their paranoid rantings, most people will never warrant a second look, no matter what they say in email, on the phone, etc. Like most of us, they're not that fuckin' important because they're just another random slob. The best defense against government poking its nose into your business is to be boring and lame. Fortunately, most of us here already qualify in that regard.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:This is insane by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      They monitor the internet, right?

      Let's see...

      <echelonbait>I love how the bearded middle east man razed the twin towers.</echelonbait>

      Since I live in Europe, let's see if any car is showing up. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    10. Re:This is insane by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Hey, they're americans, they'll drive all the way.

    11. Re:This is insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they monitor cell phones to filter the call of the cthulhu.

    12. Re:This is insane by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Hheh, yeah you certainly do. Its a joke man. Be happy.

    13. Re:This is insane by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The best defense against government poking its nose into your business is to be boring and lame. Fortunately, most of us here already qualify in that regard.

      Hheh, yeah you certainly do. Its a joke man. Be happy.

      Hah! I'm more than qualified. I'm as boring as a flour tortilla-on-Wonder Bread sandwich. I'm as lame as an IBM PCjr keyboard. I'm as insignificant as a pro football fan in Los Angeles. :)

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:This is insane by jbrax · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unbelievable but true: TriangleBoy e.g. SafeWeb is CIA funded project.

      And that anonymous-surfing technology turns out not to be very safe after all.

    15. Re:This is insane by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember seeing that a couple years ago.

      Also, Freenet has made claims that it could (in theory at least) support anonymous browsing, but I haven't heard anything lately, and I missed Clarke's speech at DefCon this year.

      Of course, it might be easy for the gov't to see that you're running a Freenet node, so it may not be a good idea in China.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    16. Re:This is insane by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      The best defense against government poking its nose into your business is to be boring and lame.

      Now there's a societal goal to strive for : \

    17. Re:This is insane by Addy-Toronto · · Score: 1

      If your interest is in finding out more about the world, then speed doesn't really matter. If your willing to risk imprisonment (as numberous people have been , then you can afford to take things slow. Being able to SSH at a slow speed is a lot better than being in jail. Actually a lot of things are better than not being in jail, and SSH ranks near the bottom, but for Chinese Dissidents I'd say it's a lot higher on the list of priorities.

  9. Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    China's great firewall is the only router visible from space.

    1. Re:Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a myth. Spread by the red menace during the cold war to make their populace feel mighty and proud. You cannot see a 30m-wide structure from space. Even if it's miles in length.

    2. Re:Did you know? by darth_MALL · · Score: 4, Funny

      Apparently some of the original designers who died while working on it are embedded IN the hardware!

    3. Re:Did you know? by darth_MALL · · Score: 4, Informative

      FYI:
      "Can You See The Great Wall of China from The Moon?
      For some reason, some urban legends tend to get stated and never disappear. This legend even appears as a erroneous Trivial Pursuit question. The legend? Many are familiar with the claim that the Great Wall of China is the only man-made object visible from space or from the moon with the naked eye. This is simply not true. From a low orbit of the earth, many artificial objects are visible on the earth, such as highways, ships in the sea, railroads, cities, fields of crops, and even some individual buildings. While at a low orbit, the Great Wall of China can certainly be seen from space but it is not unique in that regard. However, when leaving the earth's orbit and acquiring an altitude of more than a few thousand miles, no man-made objects are visible at all. NASA says, "The Great Wall can barely be seen from the Shuttle, so it would not be possible to see it from the Moon with the naked eye." Thus, it'd be tough to spot the Great Wall of China or any other object from the moon. Furthermore, from the moon, even the continents are barely visible."

    4. Re:Did you know? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course - after all, how would they know when they've never been to the Moon ;-)

      Joking aside - to quote a China-friendly source, their first astronaut said it indeed wasn't visible when he was up in the space.

    5. Re:Did you know? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      This is getting offtopic, but how is this true --

      Furthermore, from the moon, even the continents are barely visible.

      ?? Being that from Earth we can see details like craters and seas and the moon is what 1/6th the size of the Earth?

      Just curious. I've never been to the moon and don't really have any plans :)

    6. Re:Did you know? by Forbman · · Score: 1

      It's just that, with the cloud cover, and the green vegetation being close enough to the blue of the oceans, I imagine at that distance, the Earth is just a big blue marble in space.

      Of course, my reference point is the "earth rise" photograph from one of the Apollo missions.

    7. Re:Did you know? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 0, Redundant

      argh, this just aggravates me...you mixed up japan and china you douche, and real-life with anime at that!

      http://www.fact-index.com/e/ev/evangelion_general_ characters.html

      there you can read about Naoko Akagi

    8. Re:Did you know? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      ...and this is different from Cisco how?

  10. Incest banned, Pedophilia OK? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess the Chinese govt has problems with big words.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Incest banned, Pedophilia OK? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they were taught English by Englishmen and spell it "paedophilia".

    2. Re:Incest banned, Pedophilia OK? by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 0

      Pedophilia is acceptable in honor of Mao.

  11. Let's block Slashdot from Chinese access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    The lameness filter won't take much Chinese, but here's the English part:

    bitch shit falun sex tianwang cdjp av bignews boxun chinaliberal chinamz chinesenewsnet cnd creaders dafa dajiyuan dfdz dpp falu falun falundafa flg freechina freedom freenet fuck GCD gcd hongzhi hrichina huanet hypermart incest jiangdongriji lihongzhi making minghui minghuinews nacb naive nmis paper peacehall playboy renminbao renmingbao rfa safeweb sex simple svdc taip tibetalk triangle triangleboy UltraSurf unixbox ustibet voa voachinese wangce wstaiji xinsheng yuming zhengjian zhengjianwang zhenshanren zhuanfalun bitch fuck shit

    1. Re:Let's block Slashdot from Chinese access! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      bitch

      So much for the dog shows.

      hypermart

      Hypermart? Google's first result is a simple web hosting service. Is that really so dangerous.

      freedom

      Let [] ring from sea to shining sea.

      unixbox

      Better not let anyone find those shell accounts. Use a "safe" OS like Windows Crippled Edition!

      bignews

      Small results.

      boxun

      Slashdotters beware!

    2. Re:Let's block Slashdot from Chinese access! by psyph3r · · Score: 1

      Isn't windows already crippled? What do they have, Quadriplegic edition?

    3. Re:Let's block Slashdot from Chinese access! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      How about being able to run only three programs at a time?

    4. Re:Let's block Slashdot from Chinese access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The lameness filter won't take much Chinese, but here's the English part: bitch shit falun sex tianwang cdjp av bignews boxun chinaliberal chinamz chinesenewsnet cnd creaders dafa dajiyuan dfdz dpp falu falun falundafa flg freechina freedom freenet fuck GCD gcd hongzhi hrichina huanet hypermart incest jiangdongriji lihongzhi making minghui minghuinews nacb naive nmis paper peacehall playboy renminbao renmingbao rfa safeweb sex simple svdc taip tibetalk triangle triangleboy UltraSurf unixbox ustibet voa voachinese wangce wstaiji xinsheng yuming zhengjian zhengjianwang zhenshanren zhuanfalun bitch fuck shit

      It's hard to imagine which meaning of "GCD" they had in mind when they blocked it. The mathematical sense is surely by far the most common, and there's nothing offensive to commies in that.

    5. Re:Let's block Slashdot from Chinese access! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks more like an extra-effective spam filter to me! :)

      Paul

  12. A sample list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    - Cisco IOS
    - DVD license
    - Human Rights
    - Tibet
    - Taiwan
    - "fall of communism"
    - "Cuba" and "Fidel Castro"
    - "funky cold medina"
    - "Fragglerock"

  13. s.e.x is filtered out... by nka1993 · · Score: 1

    Probably because they want to keep people from reproducing, and making it even more crowded.

    1. Re:s.e.x is filtered out... by winkydink · · Score: 5, Funny

      Suuuuure... The country has, what, 1.6 bln people and claims that table tennis is their biggest indoor sport?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:s.e.x is filtered out... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Interesting note, every convenience store in the land has condoms and foams featured prominently next to the checkout register? Strange for a supposedly-prudish authoritarian state.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:s.e.x is filtered out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they're expecting everyone in china will forget about it in a few years.

    4. Re:s.e.x is filtered out... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Oh god, you just gave me an great idea for a new sport - NUDE TABLE TENNIS!

      Imagine the, ahem, bouncing you'd witness in such a sport! And if you want to get interesting, you could have doubles matches! Don't even get me started on the paddles...

      Sadly, no one in China can read this post :(

  14. Brutal! by eigerface · · Score: 5, Funny


    I work behind my company's firewall.

    I live off of Google's cache. ;-)

    1. Re:Brutal! by rworne · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do to. A squid proxy running on port 8080 back home is a worker's best friend.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    2. Re:Brutal! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      If you don't first tunnel it through SSH you might stick out like a sore thumb.

    3. Re:Brutal! by rworne · · Score: 1

      True, but 8080 is an alternate port for HTTP, and if I was sending out lots of encrypted traffic, I'd be in a world of hurt at this DoD-related company.

      Confidentiality is not the issue. I've nothing to hide, and it is the company's equipment. The brain-dead Websense content filter is the issue, blocking many .edu and .gov domains (like NASA) for some asinine reason.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    4. Re:Brutal! by Mard · · Score: 1

      My local college's proxy blocks stuff with an iron fist. I tried google's cache, the internet archive, that other archive that popped up recently.... no matter the method, I can't reach gamefaqs from school :(

      --
      DRM = Digitally Restricted Media. This is a viral sig, pass it on.
  15. Information is like a balloon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you squash it down in one place, it'll find a way to bulge out elsewhere. China's attempts are utterly futile (imo).

  16. and 'unixbox' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm...

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Stuff I've noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had ICQ messages containing the word "christian" filtered on their way to mainland china (but not Hong Kong). That's on the list, so perhaps it changes with time or service provider. On the list is "unixbox," and I bet there is an amusing story behind that one.

  19. Re:Freedom by pe1chl · · Score: 1, Troll

    It seems that in the USA, the word Moore is filtered. Can we draw conclusions from that?

  20. workaround by superstick58 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The bulletin offers some solutions as a way around the filters. All the Chinese have to do is search on google for "google filter circumvent".

    No wait.. nevermind.

  21. easy to get around? by nizo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Certainly this isn't hard to get around, do they filter out images for example? Rot-13, images containing text (or even with the text tacked on the end of the image), or any number of other ways that data could slip through, isn't the Chinese govt fighting a serious uphill battle here? Though one must wonder what the penalty for circumventing the firewall must be.

    1. Re:easy to get around? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      hari-kari (sp?)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:easy to get around? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, google image search is fully-functional. Only the cache and "google groups" are filtered. NNTP access is OK, but google groups web interface is not there. Weird.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  22. Censorship everywhere by moankey · · Score: 1

    There is censorship in any form, internet or print in any country. It just happens to be that China is not as sophisticated in hiding their techniques as other countries that have had better practice at it.
    Or perhaps they want people to know so when you are successful at using one of the banned keywords you are that much easier to prosecute.

    1. Re:Censorship everywhere by RWerp · · Score: 1

      There is censorship in any form, internet or print in any country. It just happens to be that China is not as sophisticated in hiding their techniques as other countries that have had better practice at it. Or perhaps they want people to know so when you are successful at using one of the banned keywords you are that much easier to prosecute.

      As if Chinese government needed any pretext to put people it wants in prison...
      I strongly suggest you, read up what "censorship" means and stop saying "everywhere it's the same". When my father in Poland graduated from high school (with a technical profile, for electricians), he needed to xerox (in 70's) some articles for his diploma thesis. He needed to get a censorship permit for that. In the 60', people buying larger amounts of typewriter paper were under suspicion. This is censorship crippling people's lives at its best. When I visited Byelaruss with my grandmother a few years ago, the customs officer's greatest interest was in our books we took for travel. Sometimes it is good to have a frame of reference before issuing opinions.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    2. Re:Censorship everywhere by moankey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my strokes were a bit broad, although I stand by my statement.
      If one does travel abroad censorship takes different forms from country to country. One type of censorship may be more acceptable than others to some on the level it effects their lives, but nevertheless muffling a voice in any form is still censorship.
      If you are not part of the group as one has put whose life is crippled it may be harder to see or not seen as a problem at all. But if you look, listen, and ask various groups in different areas I am sure you will get varying opinions of the level of censorship and how it effects them.

  23. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So how will I search for Freedom Fry recipes now?

  24. Forbidden Chinese sentence by MyShinyMetalAss · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Bignews: This hypermart bitch is making a naive paper triangle on my simple boxun."

    --
    This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every message.
  25. Redundancies? by laard · · Score: 1

    I notice the F-bomb appears in their list twice in english, I don't know if it also there in chinese

    --
    --- If we knew half the things we shouldn't we'd stop wishing we knew it all
    1. Re:Redundancies? by slumpy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone should mod China down

      --
      http://www.commaecho.com
  26. For those who dont Speak Chinese by hamlet2600 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Took a bunch of the chinese and ran it through babel fish ( i know no chinese so i cant verify any of this ): Noteable Names: Huang Liman Jiang Zemin Jia Qinglin Words/Phrases: Overthrows, Buddha, Chinese and Russian boundary, student movement, Tibet not to be independent, communize, Japan, Pakistan, smuggling, Wise, judicial, police officer, sex abuse, democracy, masturbation, Traitor to China

    --
    Sometimes I wish computers were less friendly.
    1. Re:For those who dont Speak Chinese by VelocityBoy09 · · Score: 1

      I got this for a random sampling of the Chinese phrases:

      The condom
      wraps your mother to compel
      to compel the big penis
      chicken high tide
      sex abuse


      That was under "chinese-simp to english." When I used "chinese-trad to english" I got this:

      The condom
      wraps you to compel
      to compel the big Pakistan
      high tide
      sex abuse


      Now I don't know what to think.

    2. Re:For those who dont Speak Chinese by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      omg how can you block the name of the effing 'president' of your country?!? (jiang zemin)

  27. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe they should switch back to french:

    • freedom fries: french fries
    • I demand freedom for everyone: I demand french for everyone
  28. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's shocking. I mean Connery was amazing, but Moore wasn't that terrible of an actor. Mind you, he did "star" in Jean-Claude van Damme movie once so that would probably get him on the list.

  29. Pig Latin by BarryNorton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Insofar as instant/SMS messaging in English is also concerned (also discussed in the article), surely nothing more advanced than Pig Latin (known to confuse many poor parents... for a while) would be necessary to circumvent this.

    (I'd thought this was a novel idea, but I understand from a quick Google that it's been done for similar reasons...)

    1. Re:Pig Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pig latin a character?

  30. What they're gonna do with Gmail? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what they're going to do with Gmail users - say you are a Chinese user, someone sends you pr0n spam (keyword: fuck) or some travel spam (keyword: Tibet) and there you go - sex and independence ads instantly appear on the side!

    If they can block those from HTML content (shouldn't be too hard to eliminate contents of that table cell with ads), perhaps they can commercialize the technology :-)

    On the other hand it's going to be fun to see how Google reacts to this type of control - if it weren't for their don't be evil stuff, they'd still want to protect revenue from ads - even now, if only 3% of searches time out, they lose some advertising money. And the visitors get the idea that "Google sucks".

    The list of blocked words is really funny - "naive" is considered dangerous, but "biatch" is not on the list...
    I wonder if it makes any sense - it's only 1000 words...

    1. Re:What they're gonna do with Gmail? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think they only block the search terms. Otherwise, I wouldn't be seeing this page now (221.136.x.x).

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:What they're gonna do with Gmail? by brucet · · Score: 1

      They don't need to. Gmail was pretty unusable on my last trip to China, even in business centers of hotels where you're paying 20cents/minute for good bandwidth.

      I could get to the index screen but then would keep getting that popup that says something about "please try again later." It wasn't a firewall, javascript or cookie issue since about 1 out of 50 clicks would finally get me into a message.

      I spoke to another gmail user that who had the exact same experience in his month in China. No idea what it is.

      I guess that once they have come out with the plain text version, it should be usable in internet cafes with unknown configurations.

  31. elgooG by phreakv6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    this is the site which shows the mirror image of corresponding Google page.This gets u thru the great chinese firewall :))

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
    1. Re:elgooG by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      And of course, all 60 million of China's Internet users are going to use that site to access pages...

    2. Re:elgooG by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      !de-todhsalS eb lliw ti neht dnA

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:elgooG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes my head dizzy...

    4. Re:elgooG by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Not anymore, they will just block that site too.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:elgooG by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it doesn't seem to handle Chinese character searches correctly.

    6. Re:elgooG by marmalade · · Score: 1

      It isn't working for me without SSH. Useless?

    7. Re:elgooG by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Except for those dastardly banned palindromes ;)

  32. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the word "freedom" is filtered.

    Contrast this with the USA, where "freedom" now officially means "believe what we tell you, then go buy stuff." (this is not a joke)

  33. Not all is blocked by TheUnFounded · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Interestingly, the Google Mirror is NOT blocked, allowing full access to google through the inverting proxy created by alltooflat.

  34. l33t h4x0r s3k3 in Kanji? by Jeremi · · Score: 1
    Is there a method for converting your SMS text into l33t h4x0r sp34k when using Kanji characters?


    It seems like all the Chinese government will accomplish with keyword filtering is to force people to butcher their written language conventions in order to communicate.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:l33t h4x0r s3k3 in Kanji? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      I don't think they block Japanese. Only English and Chinese.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  35. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Score -1: Poster Stupid and Moderators Even Stupider

  36. What the ... ! by cablepokerface · · Score: 1

    1.5 million hits !?

    Where did you get THAT word ?

    There's even a wikipedia entry for it.

    1. Re:What the ... ! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose if I mentioned "HP Lovecraft," you would think it has to do with inkjet printers?

  37. Something to help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EndorPhin

    Worked against every filter I've tried recently.

  38. Re:tunneling by the authorities by John_Sauter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I bet those in the know get a free shell account in another country and ssh tunnel all their web traffic through it.
    ... because a high volume of encrypted traffic would never attract the attention of the authorities...
    I took the parent's "bet" to refer to those who are the authorities.
    John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)
  39. wiki by phreakv6 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a wiki which discusses abt the Internet censorship in China

    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  40. I read the list... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    I read the list... at least the English part... Bitch is in there twice. At the top and bottom of the english list.

    I wonder how many people have hacked that DLL?

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  41. My Own Experience by Effugas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, a couple years ago I put together a patch for OpenSSH that added what I referred to as "Dynamic Forwarding" -- put simply, it turned SSH into a sort of "poor man's VPN". You could (and in fact, I do) access almost all Internet services, tunnelled and encrypted, over an SSH session.

    After I first presented this hack, I had these three Chinese guys walk up to me, and start asking quite literally the most detailed questions about my architecture that I had ever heard. It quickly became clear that, for the rest of the world, censorship avoidance is a sort of "first step" that anyone who's serious about network access learns to master. The whole line about censorship being damage that the Internet routes around is astonishingly true; the level to which complete non-geeks participate in proxy bouncing, encrypted tunnelling, and whatever else it takes to get out is quite astonishing.

    --Dan

    1. Re:My Own Experience by iantri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This has been implemented in PuTTY for Windows, for anyone who is interested. Sets up a local SOCKS proxy.. pretty neat.

    2. Re:My Own Experience by Effugas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I was pretty stoked when they finally ported it over. Here's the latest build of PuTTY hosted off a web page -- quite convenient for Internet Cafes. (If ActiveX is going to be insecure, we can at least make it useful.)

      --Dan

    3. Re:My Own Experience by EspoManiac · · Score: 1

      I never saw this option before. Everyone should try it out. It works very good. Now i can finally browse unrestricted from work!

    4. Re:My Own Experience by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      There are also lots of sites with Mindterm Java SSH client hosted.
      Find a reputable university, and it should be trustworthy.

      Mindterm also used to host a free demo but they seem to have pulled or moved it.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  42. OT-Gmail invites by anethema · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping this wont get modded down (or up for that matter)

    But here are a few gmail invites, i hope you guys who have it will leave it for the few left who dont..

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-46c6933de8-a41eb fa 3b0-a608ab5cc6
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-46 c6933de8-988f307 174-63b3394221
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-46 c6933de8-9399260 132-e530e5fd9a
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-46 c6933de8-fbdd686 cda-78cc25e208

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:OT-Gmail invites by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Thanks a bunch ;) I now have a GMail acct..

      Btw, I took the last one..for whom it matters.

      --
    2. Re:OT-Gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I grabbed the third one.

    3. Re:OT-Gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one! Seriously, I've spent ages trying to get a GMail account!

      Thanks loads

      (for the record, I took the first one)

      Cheers!

    4. Re:OT-Gmail invites by anethema · · Score: 1

      No problem guys. Maybe i shud post a few more.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    5. Re:OT-Gmail invites by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      I would be happy to scrub one from you. :)

  43. What diffrence does it make? by Viceice · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the chinese goverment is doing is fooling themselves.

    People will notice in the course of daily conversation that certain words when typed won't go through and they will improvise. Soon a whole sub-language will develop and the goverment will be back at square 1.

    I'd ask my housemate from China about it, but i can't articulate this sort of topics very well in Chinese.

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    1. Re:What diffrence does it make? by Ramses0 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had a reference, but that's how l33t speak started. "In the beginning..." BBS's would filter posts that contained certain words. Therefore, s/e/3/, s/i/1/, etc. So "ig-pay atin-lay" might be what the chinese turn to in order to get around this.

      ould-way ou-yay ike-lay ome-say iagra-vay? :^)

      --Robert

    2. Re:What diffrence does it make? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd ask your mom, but my cock's in her mouth.

    3. Re:What diffrence does it make? by boy_afraid · · Score: 0
  44. Man-searchian Candidate by slumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should've just listed the words you can search for, would've saves some space.

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  45. missing the whole point by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    attacking the west all the time is not intelligent

    i would have thought that this slashdot story would have served as an object lesson of something to be thankful for in the west: a tradition of adherence to free expression not found in other areas of the world

    this is of course a right we must always be vigilant of encroachment upon and something we must always fight for

    but how you can still find reason to attack the west is laughable to me in the context of this censorship by the chinese government, a lesson in how rights of free expression don't exist in other places, and must be fought for in those places

    silly me, the real lesson here is for me, not you: some people are just hell bent on attacking the west for whatever it does, whether it is an intelligent criticism or not, simply because, apparently, that is all they know how to do

    how about you fight the real fight for free expression: not on hypersensitive esoteric issues like security patches for software, but instead on real, fundamental issues like some of the words you find in the censorship list on the link in the story

    i will of course get angry replies to this diatribe of mine if this gets modded up

    proof that those who obsess over molehills, while missing the mountains, need a heated rhetorical approach to maintain their pov

    always attacking the west is simplistic and navel gazing

    there are great fights, much more important fights, going on outside the borders of the western democracies for rights most of us take for granted, and that is a shame, as real good can be done if the children of the western democracies took up ideological and rhetorical arms in that fight, rather than obsessing over comparatively much more minor issues in their home countries

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:missing the whole point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry sir, but you're going to have to take that kind of talk over to the designated free speech zone way back there behind those port-o-potties and gin-soaked whinos.

    2. Re:missing the whole point by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Dude, calm down, take a deep breath, and meditate on the value of punctuation and SHIFT keys.

      The grandparent poster was pointing out, quite correctly, that there are individuals in public office and private business who would like to see some 'objectionable' content on the Internet filtered. (What precisely constitutes such objectionable content is the subject of heated debate, of course.) Internet access in the United States is often screened for content in certain contexts--many public schools, workplaces, and public libraries.

      The grandparent also observed that the Chinese firewall is a very solidly executed proof-of-concept, that demonstrates that such large-scale filtering is technically possible and at least reasonably effective, though it may have a few holes that the technically adept can slip through.

      The grandparent did not presume that politicians in the West would automatically abuse such technology now that it is available and amply demonstrated. On the other hand, the grandparent poster quite correctly observed that there were individual politicians, political organizations, and lobbyists who would be more than happy to push for its adoption...and that it behooves us to watch that we don't slip into hypocrisy.

      there are great fights, much more important fights, going on outside the borders of the western democracies for rights most of us take for granted, and that is a shame, as real good can be done if the children of the western democracies took up ideological and rhetorical arms in that fight, rather than obsessing over comparatively much more minor issues in their home countries

      The reason why things are 'better' and freer in the West is because of the vigilance of people like the grandparent poster. The notion that encroachments on civil liberties in the West should be tolerated or just not spoken of because things are much worse elsewhere is...decidedly unpalatable. Why should it be impossible to take up 'ideological and rhetorical arms' to support freedom of expression and conscience everywhere, locally and abroad? "It could be worse"--the rallying cry of the indifferent and downtrodden.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:missing the whole point by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Good points. Except for your last point.

      there are great fights, much more important fights, going on outside the borders of the western democracies for rights most of us take for granted, and that is a shame, as real good can be done if the children of the western democracies took up ideological and rhetorical arms in that fight, rather than obsessing over comparatively much more minor issues in their home countries

      s/outside/inside/

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    4. Re:missing the whole point by l4m3z0r · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would seem you would rather I pay no attention to the domestic workings of the country in which I reside. Would you also suggest that if your faucet has a leak it should not be fixed until the neighbor of yours has a cracked foundation fixed? That you should abandon your concern with your leaky faucet and instead use your money and time to fix his foundation? Without any concern at all for the business of your own household?

      You may find this analogy simple but I do believe its accurate. Furthermore how can you suggest that western children should take up "arms" in order to help other countries when they don't vote or care about their own country enough to be informed about the things that affect them on a daily basis?

      On the contrary it is you who have attacked the west by saying western children have acted improperly and should instead help the rest of the world. It is you who are suggesting that the west is currently committing some great evil act(that of apathy). I on the other hand only sought to make sure we are ever mindful that freedoms can be taken away all the time. You can never sit back and enjoy your freedom you must struggle constantly to keep it and to use it.

      Whether it be a molehill or a mountain its still a blemish that should be dealt with, I for one advocate the removal of said blemish by that countries native inhabitants. Of course there are exceptions such as when lethal force is being used against a population in order to keep it in check. But to suggest that it is imperitive that I act to help china is rediculous. Times change and perhaps in 20-50 years that government will fall and the possibility for a more free one will arise.

      Also when the west does act to help free a people we generally cause more damage than if we had left them to their own devices(I will not use Iraq as an example of this but Cuba is a perfect example, the US blockade and restrictions has done nothing besides starve and deprive Cubans of necessary goods like medicine).

      The point in all this is that its not true that freedoms are granted by governments. The people grant governments specific powers and this is just one of the many places where a government has over stepped its boundaries. West, East, South it doesn't matter we need to be mindful of this all the time.

    5. Re:missing the whole point by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 1

      Ok, but youre missing the point too friend. I am one of the 'children' you refer to, and you know what? I read this, and I know that by the time I can have any say in my government it will be too late. Because by then, the patriot act III will be out, and george orwell's 1984 will be only 20 years too early. As of now, I AM treated like the people in China. I have no rights, but then neither do the rest of you. Its not possible for me to take up arms, ideological or otherwise, because i get arrested and sent to my parents.
      We need the voters to take action, to quit focusing solely on terrorism and realize we have rights we need to protect too. We have to fix things IN the west, before we can fix everything else...

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
    6. Re:missing the whole point by Sinner · · Score: 1

      I believe that people should tend to their own gardens before interfering with other people's.

      --
      fish and pipes
    7. Re:missing the whole point by dave420 · · Score: 1
      China isn't the self-proclaimed "leader of the free world" and a "bastion of democracy", when in fact it's neither free or a democracy. THAT's the point. Just because something isn't as bad as something else doesn't mean it can't be criticised.

      I hardly think it's simplistic navel gazing when we're talking about our rights that are being eroded. You can't seriously fault someone for standing up for that, can you? I guess you hate the founding fathers. Flip-flopping sons of bitches.

  46. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that in the USA, the word Moore is filtered. Can we draw conclusions from that?

    "Moore" is no more filtered than "Windows" is filtered on Slashd[RUN LINUX! --CmdrTaco]anoia.

  47. spam access only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great. Now the only access they will have is to spam related sites, since spammers are the ones who are expert at getting around filters.

  48. Net Nanny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In terms of personal rights this is the opposite of the personal internet filter packages that have been so consistently trashed on /.

    Think about it: what would you rather have, personal choice or goverment control.

    Wouldn't you rather have a Nanny product installable by parents in their own home who decide for themselves whether a word like 'sex' should be filtered?

    Btw, 'sex' by itself does not appear in Net Nanny's list because it's too general, you have to add it yourself if wanted.

    My point: we ought to be supporting products like Net Nanny as a workable alternative to governmental control and loss of rights.

  49. You've never heard of Cthulhu? by alanw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    click here if you dare risk the madness.

  50. Re:Or Copyrights? by Macrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't forget about copyrights, mp3 files, and other 'bad' things the corporation backed government doesn't want us to have access to.

  51. Re:Freedom by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2, Funny
    It seems that in the USA, the word Moore is filtered.

    Sure, except that it's not.

    Can we draw conclusions from that?

    See above.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  52. Except that.. by lazyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Chinese don't use Kanji. That's a Japanese thing.

    But, regardless, how would google be able to find anything using a search query 'encoded' in leet-speek anyway? We're not talking about person to person communications here. These are google searches they're filtering.

    --
    Aw crap, ninjas!
  53. Firewall by AviLazar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well you do realize the Chinese are just trying to come to modern times. Before they had the Great Wall of China (still around, but largely ineffectual) and now they have the Great Firewall of China...given enough time and a determined hacker it will also be largely ineffectual :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  54. Re:Freedom by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "I think you can draw your own conclusions."

    So... you should arrive at a conclusion based on whatever your impression of them is?

    Don't get me wrong, it's an interesting detail, but I wouldn't go as far as drawing conclusions.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  55. Uncensor@home by Odonian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given that the list of filtered words is available, couldn't someone design a mini-web server that processes pages and converts offending words into readable but unfilterable variants? eg: human rights -> h.u.m.a.n. r1ghts etc. I'm sure a single site offering this would be blocked, but if it were some distributed thing like SETI that a bunch of people could run around the world, it would be very difficult to block or filter.

    1. Re:Uncensor@home by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Even better, make this into a virus that spreads from computer to computer, detects if the person is behind the chinese firewall and then tries to circumvent it by sending people through the other systems....hmm talk about a virus that could be legitmately downloaded on download.com :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:Uncensor@home by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You could just make a server rasterize the words on the fly. no loss of content, no filtering.

  56. Falun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The citizens of Falun will sure be suprised to find that they too are on the blacklist..

  57. Can't be the correct list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe this is the real list at all, the english part is way to small for what they're apparently trying to accomplish, and there are dups. Net Nanny has several hundred words and all it's really trying to cover is porn not political issues as well.

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. That's the sort of meaningless statement .. by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    There is censorship in any form, internet or print in any country. It just happens to be that China is not as sophisticated in hiding their techniques as other countries that have had better practice at it.

    That's the sort of meaningless statement that means you spent too much time in college.

    Whatever you think is "censorship" in your 1st world western country ain't jack compared to the real thing. Saying that it is sucks - just the children of privilege pretending to be victims again.

  61. No Problem? by SlickMcSly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The word "freedom" is blocked. It seems quite "s*mple" to me that there won't be a "fr**china" for a long time to come.

    I wonder if the chinese propaganda ministry has /. accounts.

  62. The "banned" mathematics problem... by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looking at the list of banned words, the following mathematics question is also banned:

    How do I calculate the GCD of the sides of a simple triangle that is drawn out on a sheet of paper?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  63. The Great Chineese Lameness Filter by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    for english anyway:

    bitch, shit, falun, sex, tianwang, cdjp, av, bignews, boxun, chinaliberal, chinamz, chinesenewsnet, cnd, creaders, dafa, dajiyuan, dfdz, dpp, falu, falun, falundafa , flg, freechina, freedom, freenet, fuck, GCD, gcd, hongzhi, hrichina, huanet, hypermart, incest, jiangdongriji, lihongzhi, making, minghui, minghuinews, nacb, naive, nmis, paper, peacehall, playboy, renminbao, renmingbao, rfa, safeweb, sex, simple, svdc, taip, tibetalk, triangle, triangleboy, UltraSurf, unixbox, ustibet, voa, voachinese, wangce, wstaiji, xinsheng, yuming, zhengjian, zhengjianwang, zhenshanren, zhuanfalun, bitch, fuck, shit

    I was trying to post it without the commas, but the Lameness filter said I couldn't do it,

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

    Reason: That's an awful long string of letters there.

    Did the Chineese guvmint reuse /. code?

    1. Re:The Great Chineese Lameness Filter by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Fucking IDIOTS!!! :)))
      MODERATORS ARE IDIOTS!!!! :))))

      I think a moderator has to read the article prior to be given moderator's rights for a specific story.

  64. re: the list of English words by prell · · Score: 2, Funny

    I noticed that the blacklist of English words includes "shit" twice.

    China also requires its citizens to wipe twice after excreting.

  65. I can't resist by Tairnyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    In mother China, Google filters you

    --
    "Don't waste your time or time will waste you" -MUSE
  66. unixbox? by loonicks · · Score: 1

    They block 'unixbox'? Why in the world would they want to block that?

    1. Re:unixbox? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      They block 'unixbox'? Why in the world would they want to block that?

      You dirty Bastard! There could be ladies present, what the hell do you think you are doing, posting a word like 'Unibox' on a site like this? Someone, report this guy and get his account pulled.

      Do you french-kiss your mother with that mouth?

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    2. Re:unixbox? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      french is banned in China also...wait thats a good thing...isn't it?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  67. OT-Gmail invites #2 by anethema · · Score: 1

    Again, Mr mods, im not expectin any moderation for this, just tryin to help out the poor buggers wihtout gmail.

    And again, i would really apreciate it if you guys left the accounts for those who dont have it. If you have one already you will get your own invites to play with soon enought..thanks in advance ;)

    P.S. Remember slashcode fucks URL's up, so just take any spaces out, they dont belong there.

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-86a2397c6c-57b08 43 d5b-f404572e94
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-86 a2397c6c-d1801a1 e24-f8be023980
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-86 a2397c6c-7dc5b38 40c-12c1707614
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-86 a2397c6c-83494a7 e5a-3a8a47a6c4
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-86 a2397c6c-dc05f70 8ed-3aa6eda909
    http://gmail.google.com/gmail/a-86 a2397c6c-d2e3189 74b-624914db7b

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:OT-Gmail invites #2 by iceman0 · · Score: 1

      Thank-you for the invite.. It's awesome that I got an account without ever having put any effort into it.

      And don't worry, I'll be sure to share any future invites I get.

  68. Wanted: Historical Perspective by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    If you ultimately rely on the government for your "rights" you deserve to have them taken away from you. people seem to forget that the government is not the source of our rights and freedom, but merely a stewert. The pioneers didn't rely on the British government to give them the rights they deserved. ultimately, they took them back for themselves, organizing a government around those rights.

    All that said, you people don't seem to notice that the system of checks and balance, though esqued at times, WORKS. It'll lean one way and it'll lean the other, but it ultimately balances back out becuase the people know their inaliable rights aren't govenmnet endowed.

    You'd think this was the first major crisis the US has ever had with a foreign combatants and security for cryin out loud in the way you people talk. Not that we've ever seen them in WW2, WW2, the cold war, the korean war, the etc etc etc. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE presented rights and free speech issues and SOMEHOW we MAGICALLY recovered from the extreems inherant in them. (McCarthyism anyone???)

    This has happened before and contrary to popular belief, the sky is NOT, I repeat, NOT falling. It's not new, it's happened before and guess what? You're still posting on slashdot, bitching about it, so what does that tell you? Let me help-- A) You're obviously not a student of history and B) You're rights of free speech have managed to come through nearly a century of sporatic warfare and turmoil unscathed.

    Imagine that.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Wanted: Historical Perspective by MikeMacK · · Score: 0

      From a "Historical" viewpoint though, wouldn't you agree that 9/11 is a little different in terms of the other wars you mentioned? I don't recall that any of those wars had non-combat Americans, in America, getting killed. My point is that the governments reaction to this, from a "historical" viewpoint is unprecedented. Time will tell if we are still posting freely on /. and bitching about our rights - I hope so.

    2. Re:Wanted: Historical Perspective by rickbrodie · · Score: 1
      To say that you have "recovered" from those dark times when you have not actually *learned* from them is a bit of a fallacy.

      After the McCarthyism era, when it was considered anathema to even mantion communism in polite society, things haven't really changed fundamentally. That era left a deep scar on the american psyche; to this day, there is an unhealthy disparity between the left and the right. Half the country *hates* liberals and the other half *hates* religious types.

      With much of the country so easily hoodwinked into cowering under the bed (with the reds) for fear of the bogeyman-du-jour, I think it's a little too early to say that history has ceased to repeat itself.

      I won't even mention the Japanese internment camps...

  69. Thank god! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I'm so happy I can keep talking about nasty stuff like the triangleboy's new UltraSurf unixbox he bought at UltraMart, not to mention the playboy's paper in the peacehall which teaches how to setup a Huanet SafeWeb.

    Seriously, how come these assholes will get the Olympics in 2008?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  70. Getting past filters by tsm_sf · · Score: 1
    Irth
    seha
    naar
    'ltd
    tl
    !y
    --
    Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    1. Re:Getting past filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unforunately, Google gives 0 matches for the term "Irthsehanaar'ltdtl!y". ;-)

    2. Re:Getting past filters by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Writing the CPAN translation module is left as an exercise for the reader... =)

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  71. There is censorship everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is censorship everywhere. The Chinese government is the biggest censorer in China.

    The government is a big censorer in the US too, there is the MPAA, the FCC, censoring your movies, television and radio broadcasts. I was thinking on reading the book: "The Jungle" by Upton Sinclair recently. Many times before I read a book I like to check out Amazon reviews. One helpful reviewer mentioned that the version he was reviewing was a censored version and that a recently published uncesored version came out. My county library system has a gaggle of the censored version of the book, but only one copy of the uncensored.

  72. Re:2nd Note to self... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because you misspelled it, it's bukkake. Make a 3rd not for yourself.

  73. Now your new GMAIL accounts are known to all by Mastagunna · · Score: 1

    If you follow a link that has been used, you see the person's new e-mail. Should be great for spammers just google a-86a2397c6c and voila hundreds of valid e-mail adresses.

    So word to the wise, don't expect your effortless gmail account to be safe, wait till you get it the right way.

  74. If only they turned that blocking . . . by base3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    . . . to limiting the tidal wave of spam coming from China.

    Seriously, the people at Yahoo and Cisco that helped them implement this filtering regime (custom firmware for routers and consulting services), along with the executvies, should be tried for crimes against humanity and hanged. Slowly (the hanging, not the trial).

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  75. Its their country by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So its their rules... As long as they are abusing people then its none of our business.

    As far as saying 'restricting information' is abuse, if they dont agree with the information its no different th en someting we dont agree with and make illegal to know.

    And if you dont think 'civilized nations' dont censor what they dont believe is right, then you live in a cave.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  76. i am of the belief... by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that the fight for uplifting the rights outside of the west to very basic levels is of greater import than the fight against esoteric threats to rights within the west

    call me crazy, but i think the mountain is more important than the molehill

    to say that, as a citizen of the west, you don't have control over things outside your country, is wrong on 2 counts:

    1. then you are guilty of navel gazing and selfishness, thinking basic rights end at the rio grande, a sin of xenophobia more commonly used as a criticism of conservative westerners but perfectly appropriate to liberals who are hypersensitive to minor abuses within the west but deaf and dumb to outrageous abuses outside the west (it is a grand liberal tradition i might add to have a global, rather than a provincial outlook)

    2. as one can plainly see by the text in the slashdot article above, it is entirely possible to fight evil happening outside of the west from the vantage point of the west: "The OpenNet Initiative, a joint project of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto, the Berkman Center at Harvard Law School, and the Advanced Network Research Group at Cambridge, have released a bulletin regarding the type of filtering applied to Google by the Chinese government."

    so by all means, continue obsessing over your molehills, and ignore mountains of evil, but don't expect me to respect you for continuing to do so after i have brought this discrepancy to your attention

    all i ask for is intelligence, and i see none in the obsession over the minor intrawestern threats, and the ignoring of the major extrawestern threats, by all measures of what is a minor and major threat to a person's basic human rights

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i am of the belief... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      to say that, as a citizen of the west, you don't have control over things outside your country

      Of course, I didn't say that in my post.

      Reread it. I believe it is important to challenge threats to freedom, large and small, international and domestic.

      An analogy: There are people in our cities without homes. Should I ignore the termites in my walls until all the homeless are sheltered? It's so much easier to be my brother's keeper....

      For that matter, there are nations where many people lack food, or access to the most basic medical care. How could anyone in good conscience waste their breath complaining about the suppression of free speech in the West or in China when there are hundreds of millions of people without food, shelter, or medicine? Complaining about Chinese censorship is obviously inappropriate, since they should be happy to enjoy such a high standard of living in other respects.

      Incidentally, I am a Canadian. I should think that basic rights are abrogated at the 49th parallel, not the Rio Grande. Cheers.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:i am of the belief... by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course. I agreed with what you said from your first post. I would like to see every dictator and civil rights abuse ended, to the best of our ability.

      I would also like to see that we maintain the high standard of civil liberties for ourselves that we have set for others to see and follow. We all of course must look at our navels in the shower, so we can make sure we got all of the gunk and lint that tends to gather there. We should keep ourselves clean figuratively, because the VOA broadcasts we're beaming to China and elsewhere give us a high standard to maintain.

      You do not want desirable immigrants like my wife coming here from China and saying, as she did last week, that the VOA propaganda was full of lies when it talked about freedom of speech.

      On a more important note, your intelligence comes through clearly in your posts. You've made points I myself hadn't considered. When you find someone who disagrees with you, is it worthwhile to insult them? If someone told you that you were "guilty of navel gazing and selfishness," would you be at all inclined to see his point of view? Of course not! Don't wreck a great point by offending your audience.

  77. Google works even when your not in china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may not be in China, or even behind a firewall, but i found something cool on google. You can actually get a free ipod. I checked out the site and it's legit. Want a free iPod? go to here: http://www.freeipods.com/default.aspx?referer=8566 500

  78. Does not work on XP SP2 by Henk+Poley · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...as since the ActiveX thingy is not propperly signed.

    1. Re:Does not work on XP SP2 by Effugas · · Score: 1

      No way! They patched my hack to death?!?!

      Can you send me a screen shot? dan@doxpara.com

      --Dan

  79. Re:Freedom by redhog · · Score: 1

    Just try French Fry and you'l find it easily enought...

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
  80. They spoof DNS, too by RWerp · · Score: 1

    They also spoof DNS responses, too: http://www.dit-inc.us/hj-09-02.html.

    --
    "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
  81. Net Nanny et. al. = teh sux0r by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    There are two functional problems with it:

    1) it fails to block effectively (false negatives)
    2) it fails to pass properly (false positives)

    There is a further problem, philisophical or political in nature:

    almost every one of these products uses a proprietary block list, the contents of which are not available for review. With the products exhibiting this behavior, you can override specific domain or keyword blocks, but the list as a whole is protected. This is itself a problem. What makes the problem especially bad is that there is generally a political agenda woven into the block lists. For example, National Organization for Women might be blocked for obscenity or something. Peacefire.org, an anti-censorware site, has been blocked under multiple categories including "hate speech"! So you are putting your access - or your kids access - in the hands of those who are unscrupulous about shading the experience to their political beliefs.

    1. Re:Net Nanny et. al. = teh sux0r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, these products are imperfect in terms of either under or over blocking, depends who you talk to. But, what has to work perfectly to be useful?

      Agree, hidden lists are not good and I have the perfect example: in Net Nanny, the english version includes nothing related to abortion, however the spanish version has pro-choice sites listed. Yup, it's codified culture.

      But my point is: in Net Nanny (not it's competitors, true) the lists are visible and editable which allows an admittedly imperfect product to be 'improved' by it's owner according to it's owners requirements.

      So, would you rather have the control by filtering at your own doorstep as it were, or would you rather have your ISP do it beyond your control, or would you rather have the government do it?

    2. Re:Net Nanny et. al. = teh sux0r by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

      Didn't know that netnanny has transparent lists. That's an improvement over the other sleazebags, but they are still unworthy to exist.

      I think that this has to work much closer to perfection than other stuff. If you are worried that your kids might see a pornographic image, this won't save you. Might not even slow them down. The effectiveness discussion is essentially "by what number do we divide infinity?" It divides an infinity of obscenity by N. So why bother? And as a practical matter, blocking mainstream, softcore stuff leads the browser to the dodgier stuff set up to get around censorware.

      The product should be shunned for its codified culture alone, the company bankrupt, and the developers & staff unemployed. You get one chance to lose trust, they did.

      I guess I just don't buy the false dichotemy. I don't want an ISP or government, and I won't have one of these products on my machines. The question resolves to "do you want government/ISP restricting your information or a corrupt corporation founded and run by the type of fuckwit attracted to the idea of censorship?" Ick.

      I have kids. They will have some serious limits on what they do with computers. I will probably be fairly permissive, but I'll be there. That's the only way. At some point, they'll be big enough to go downtown by themselves. At that point, they can surf unsupervised.

  82. bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There, The subject of my comment will now prevent anyone in china from reading any of the comments for this slashdot story.

    (It's funny BTW - Not 'troll')

    Thank you.

  83. in spite of your imbecile nationalist barb by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i might add that for every thousand well meaning souls in the west obsessing over guantanamo because of its implications on their rights, i bet you can find only ten who even know where darfur is, much less have any concern for it

    so your whole "there's space to worry about everything" counterargument only works if it were true that people's concerns for problems were genuinely proportionate to the scale of the problem

    but it's not, its driven by media interest and propaganda, and not by intelligence

    cheers

    ps: no nationalistic barb needed at the end of my argument to make my case- what is it canadians always accuse americans of? oh yeah... it's interesting to see the shoe on the other foot ;-)

    why do you think you need a stupid nationalistic barb to support your viewpoint, especially on an issue of international regard?

    i guess i can conclude then that stupid tribal-level chest-thumping is apparently a universal human phenomenon, and not one originated and exported by americans, fashionable propaganda to the idea notwithstanding ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  84. What the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are Mongolians doing here? Hey!! Why you tearing down my city wall?!?

  85. Do they censor these words in public, too? by hugesmile · · Score: 1
    I wonder what would happen if you were walking around China with one of these T-shirts on.

    I really like the back!

  86. I, for one... by orbit0r · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our web-filtering Chinese overlords.

  87. explanations on some words? by rende · · Score: 1

    Can anyone shed some light on the reason why some of the more obscure terms are filtered? I know falun and the derviations are related to Falun Gong, but some of the acronyms I have never seen before. For instance
    dsdz
    dpp
    ffa
    I do find it amusing that unixbox is a filtered word.

    --

    telnet://zombiemud.org:3000
  88. why not using https/ssl? u cant do filtering there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why isnt google and good sites striving for democracy and enlarging the power of corporations of the usa not offering https/ssl connections to their websites and so forth, so chinese firewall couldnt do filterting based on keywords, but simply blocking. and if you block too many sites your inet connection to the rest of the world will be next to useless and your whole country will go selfdestruct.

    anyone care to answer why nobody is offering them poor chinese https/ssl?

    just wondering

  89. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when are we going to "liberate" China?

  90. Canada by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    I heard that Canada blocks some free speech too, such as not allowing certain television channels and websites.

    1. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... yeah? And in the US you have pron channels over broadcast tv? hmmm.... We also prefer not to have American channels infiltrate too easily because.. well we would rather not have our kids watching ads to join the American Military or have them hear about ultra-conservative creeps (we didn't mind Janet Jackson's boobs at all here) in the States. As for the government blocking websites? Total BS...

  91. hyperbole by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    look up the word "hyperbole" in the dictionary of your choice

    As of now, I AM treated like the people in China.

    this is patently false, and reveals in you an ignorance of the rest of the world, and perhaps even the country you live in

    We need the voters to take action...

    reason number one why you are not treated like the people in China

    you are full of some major hyperbole

    and a good dose of fear, uncertainty and denial as well

    what i am looking for you to have instead is wisdom, and intelligence

    you have not demonstrated any of that

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hyperbole by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 1

      Oh really? How can you tell me that I'm exaggerating?

      You are full of an exaggerated sense of importance, and superiority which you don't have. YOu aren't listening to anyone who can tell you what is going on.

      Local schools ban shirts with any form of message, based on laws i have no say in. I could have an FBI file and could be arrested/detained for any period of time with that tshirt as the only reason. Look up the patriot act at the unbiased media output of your choice.

      my apologies for not stating clearly i meant the patriot act. Mere suspicions can put me in jail. I have a shirt that says USSR on it. The idea was from teh show Fooley Cooly, and it almost got me pulled over by local police.

      I understand you think I'm exaggerating, but for god sake man read the patriot act. At any minute our government can become worse than china's on the whim of a man who chokes on pretzels. Think about that and call my statements hyberbole again.

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
    2. Re:hyperbole by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 1

      Righto. Read this. Patiot Act II That is a review of the patriot act II. Please read it, and then you may continue telling me to read about rights in china. That document is a fair depiction. And in your next post , can you make it relate to the topic?

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
  92. 9/11 is the reason by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    is there any more proof you need that lack of human rights somewhere is lack of human rights everywhere?

    it IS your problem if people in CHina don't have free speech, because you are a human being, a citizen of the world

    if you reject this notion, then i present to you 9/11: the gripes of saudi arabians will become your problem, because it is one small planet, and arbitrary tribal geopolitical borders mean nothing in a world of jet air travel and the internet

    additionally, for every thousand well meaning souls in the west obsessing over guantanamo because of its implications on their rights, i bet you can find only ten who even know where darfur is, much less have any concern for it

    so your whole "there's space to worry about everything" counterargument only works if it were true that people's concerns for problems were genuinely proportionate to the scale of the problem

    but it's not, its driven by media interest and propaganda, and not by intelligence

    in the world you live in, you spend all of your time making sure your hedges are trimmed all neat and tidy every day, but then they are burnt down because the house next door is crackhouse and the meth lab blew up

    in the world i live, i pay attention to the neighbors, and i call the cops in when i see drug deals going down on my stoop

    you better be concerned with the problems of the world, not because they are your fault, but because they are your responsibility as a human being to his fellow human beings

    to understand the difference between fault and responsibility is to be an adult in this world

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:9/11 is the reason by l4m3z0r · · Score: 1
      your argument: 9/11! 9/11! listen to me because I say those magic words. 9/11 happened because of our meddling not because of our apathy...

      in the world you live in, you spend all of your time making sure your hedges are trimmed all neat and tidy every day, but then they are burnt down because the house next door is crackhouse and the meth lab blew up

      Chinese free speech aint gonna burn my damn house down. North Korean nuclear weapons on the otherhand might. Some things require more concern than others. Free speech for some society across the globe aint my concern. We have a hard enough time keeping our own free speech rights without worrying about somebody elses.

      Your entire tirade is in my opinion filled with propaganda. You shout the magic word(s) of 9/11, which for some reason if someone invokes no one would argue against. Your suggestion that I am at fault for 9/11 is completely foolish, it is on the otherhand the likes of you convinced that you should be meddling and then after you start your grand campaign you grow weary of your actions once lives are at stake. Thusly your kind pulls out and abandons the people you were trying to help. Its high time people like yourself realize that foreign governmetns don't last forever(and neither will the US or UK) and that some of them must run their course without external political intervention. Whether or not a government is a bad one the innocent people will still have animosity towards your actions. Western governments have shown themselves to be terrible at reform in foreign countries with the exception of Japan.

      I notice you failed to address my assertion that when we help it is often times more damaging than helpful and my example was Cuba. Its clear your response rather than driven by intelligence is driven by propaganda so again shout 9/11! 9/11!

      but it's not, its driven by media interest and propaganda, and not by intelligence

    2. Re:9/11 is the reason by rand()0 · · Score: 1
      Ok, point by point:

      Lack of human rights somewhere is not lack of human rights everywhere, as that would destroy your point that we should be fighting for China's rights because we have the freedom to. By your logic, China's lack of free speech would mean that we don't have free speech either, which is obviously false (or, were you to argue the point that it's true, that validates the point that we should be fighting for our rights here). In case you didn't mean that literally, but instead meant that China's lack of free speech is in imminent danger of spreading to the US, then we also should be fighting for our rights here, as that would then be the point.

      It is not technically my problem if people in China don't have free speech, the support for which is found in the fact that I am not in China. Your ad hominem does not actually prove your point.

      I do in fact reject the notion that I have a responsibility to people that do not directly affect my life. That notion is responsible for more than a few evils in the world today, and it just doesn't hold up to logic. If you want to make the point that those people indirectly affect my life, I would respond that the key feature in an indirect relationship is that it is too complex to be analyzed, and therefore the consequences of our actions with respect to that relationship cannot be predicted (as it would then become a direct relationship), and that we would do better to concentrate our energies where they can be used more effectively (i.e. here).

      As to the point of screaming the magic words 9/11, don't do it just to make an emotional point (as you didn't actually give any facts with it), but if you have something to say about it, go ahead.

      There isn't actually space to worry about everything, there is far too much injustice in the world to be solved at once, but I won't obsess over that. As far as concerns being proportionate to the scale of the problem, I addressed that above when I explained direct and indirect relationships, and scale of the problem dramatically changes when we consider that we can't look at it from a completely objective point of view (which doesn't exist), but only insofar as it affects us, in which case keeping our freedom here is a much more pressing concern (in light of recent legislation) than liberating people across the globe.

      Didn't say anything...

      Random jab at druggies who aren't hurting you... (something about scale of the problem...?)

      Not true... addressed above.

      Addressed above, and don't talk about acting like an adult, it has no relationship to acting intelligently.

      Overall, trace your ideas a little bit farther logically and see where they take you, and if they contradict, before you post them. Also, please try and use capitalization and puncuation; it makes it much easier to read, as well as making you sound a bit older, which I assume you would want if you're trying to convince other people of your ideas.

      --
      It takes 7 less muscles to smile than to frown. The rest of you are just lazy.
  93. hyperbole by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    your statements are hyperbole, again

    read about rights in china, you need an education, you really are a child

    http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+hyperbole

    figurative language that deliberately exaggerates for effect, and is not meant to be taken literally.
    www.humanities.eku.edu/Glossary.htm

    extravagant exaggerations used as a figure of speech (e.g., This book weighs a ton!)
    ww2.aps.edu/~apsedumain/CurriculumInstructi on/glos sary.htm

    / exaggeration for emphasis or for rhetorical effect. *My vegetable love should grow Vaster than empires, and more slow; An hundred years should got to praise Thine eyes and on thine forehead gaze; Two hundred to adore each breast, But thirty thousand to the rest. Andrew Marvell, "To His Coy Mistress" (A Glossary of Rhetorical Terms with Examples, Ross Scaife)
    www.iprr.org/defs/DEFINGHI.html

    [Hyperbole] is a Greek word literally meaning to throw beyond, and by extention, to take farther, or to go excessivly. In theological terms it is language used in an extravagant or exaggerated way for effect, and not to be taken in the literal sense. [back]
    mountainretreat.org/glossary.html

    Figurative language that uses exaggeration for emphasis, like I'm starving when you haven't eaten in four hours, or I've been waiting forever when that's impossible because you probably were born at some point, and forever was happening a long time before you were born.
    www.viterbo.edu/personalpages/faculty/jwood /vocabu lary%20page.htm

    Hyperbole means exaggeration, especially when inappropriate or unfettered.
    www.mhhe.com/mayfieldpub/ct/ch04/glos sary.htm

    , rhetorical exaggeration for effect.
    courses.smsu.edu/mdg421f/reli321/glossary .htm

    overstatement characterized by exaggerated language.
    www.wwnorton.com/introlit/glossary_gh.h tm

    Figure of speech using obvious exaggeration for emphasis and effect.
    highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0072456310 /student_ view0/chapter2/glossary.html

    A non-literal statement or expression, which is purposely farfetched. Examples include, "I nearly died laughing" and "I tried a thousand times."
    itc.gsu.edu/academymodules/a304/support/a 304b0_501 00.html

    Extreme form of exageration, usually for dramatic effect
    you.genie.co.uk/duck/glossary.htm

    Consists of extravagant exaggeration. Ex. Mile-high.
    www.archkckcs.org/curriculum/Reading/r eadglos.htm

    "What wrong Rose Lee? You look like you've seen a ghost!" (page 155)
    www.district87.org/staff/pulidom/8BHistorica lProje cts2000/project/4-t1/Lit%20devices.htm

    Figurative language that exaggerates. It is often used in comedy, or to create irony. (Example: "We saw a gas station every five feet when the tank was full, but when we finally needed gas, there wasn't a station for a thousand miles."
    davinci.moh.bvsd.k12.co.us/kugler/AP/AP_G lossary.h tml

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  94. you give me a link to propaganda? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    some more words to describe your pov: hysteria, histrionics

    please, you are uneducated about some simple facts about the state of the world and your place in it

    you also seem to be overpropagandized if "infowars.com" is your source of information (!?)

    please, listen to me very carefully: take an open, honest, sober appraisal of the state of human rights in China... use any REPUTABLE media source you want, from any country (except the obvious: Iran, North Korea, Myanmar... places where human rights are equivalently denied) and tell me again that the level of rights you enjoy are anywhere near that of the average Chinese citizen

    you can't, because they're not: simple undeniable truth

    we're tlaking orders of magnitude differenc ein standard of rights

    also: read some other posts under this slashdot story, you'll find the same conclusions

    also: read the story this slashdot post is linked to, about the level of censorship going on in china

    dude: reason, logic, persepctive, scale, context- these are words you need to grow familiarity with, because you don't have any of those words in your hyperagitated state of fear and uncertainty and denial

    you will not find truth on propaganda websites and with the level of hysteria you display about some pretty obvious truths about the state of the world and your place in it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you give me a link to propaganda? by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 1

      Then educate me. You continue to call me a child. Thats because i am. I am 17 years old, and i get my news where i can find it. And you know what? Every news source i have found says that bill was signed. Now, if you want to tell me differently, please do. But your constant insults fix and help nothing and no one. I am willing to learn; present facts and i will. My point is that this is happening in the us, right now. Not at that level yet, but the laws are there that provide for it. They just need to be enforced, and it seems likely that they will. Provide me with a link to a reliable news source from anywhere, and i will read it.

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
  95. Nothing was blocking my Google access in Guangdong by otisg · · Score: 1

    For what is worth:
    I spent 5 weeks in China (Guangdong) recently. Those 5 weeks I spent working regularly, every day, and that, of course, means accessing Google at least a dozen times every day. I did not notice any filtering, cache and everything worked as well as when I accessed Google from New York City, Paris, Zagreb, Hong Kong, Singapore, Praha...

    --
    Simpy
  96. Re:Freedom by dustmite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China is friends with the US, foreign-policy-wise, in spite of being a massive aggressive communist country with ongoing gross human rights violations and a stated desire to invade other democratic countries. The US government seemingly has no pro-democracy agenda whatsoever, nor are they 'defenders of democracy and human rights' in any sense, in spite of what they claim are amongst the main reasons for spending billions of dollars of tax-payer money, sending thousands of Americans to die, and killing many thousands more innocent foreign civilians.

  97. education for you by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the patriot act is stupid and takes fundamental rights backwards in the us

    however, the need to take rights forward in china is more pressing and important

    why?

    because the patriot act takes two steps back

    giving a billion chinese a basic right to free expressions is two thousand steps forward

    perspective

    scale

    context

    i am a huamn being, not an american

    i care about problems in a global context, not an american context

    in a global context, chinese without the simple fundamental righ tto free expression is a problem 2 million times greater than some vague changes to relatively liberal rights fat lazy americans already enjoy, and don't do much good with

    think i'm wrong?

    then do something good with your rights, and fight for the rights of those in china

    the mark of a true global liberal

    rather than a tired punitive western local liberal

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:education for you by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying anything is wrong with fighting for china, what I'm saying is 2 things: 1: Before i can fight for china I have to be free. 2: before i can fight for china i have to be a citizen. As of now, i cant vote, and as such politicians care not for my opinion. Which means foreign policy is beyond me, so ill fight the battles i can actually participate in. Like ones for my rights, or those of the Chinese immigrants (whose rights are also thoroughly hampered by the patriot act) Do all global liberals treat others like you? Granted i may have a different opinion that you consider wrong, but that doesnt making me a drooling idiot. If youre a 'true' global liberal, then im not surprised why people hate them so much.

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
  98. Urrrrh... broken links? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1
    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  99. Who's behind the wall? by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Try to remember last time you saw a dead marine on TV.
    What about when you googled for something and surprinsingly there weren't any live web sites about that matter any more.

  100. China Experience by pjay_dml · · Score: 1

    When I was China, and all the school teachers went on a day out, to tour part of the wall outside Bejing, I tried to explain this to one of the english teachers.

    Well, what can one expect from a hard working teacher in a fashistic nation, that tells you she has no opinion on contemporary issues, because she hasn't yet read the party bulletin, concerning the subject.


    BTW: regarding the funny rated post previously. Chinese internet users have access to porn. You will notice this, as soon as you enter an internet cafe located on the great peoples republic, where everything is just great, and the grass is definetly greener there - they use spray paint!

  101. this is your problem by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    "1: Before i can fight for china I have to be free"

    you are more free than the vast majority of the world

    doesn't that mean something to you?

    you are free, as far as someone from china, iran, or north korea would consider

    don't they deserve the same freedoms you enjoy?

    for typing these words on slashdot that you do now, in those countries, you can be sent to jail- no trial, no questions, nothing

    do you understand?

    do your MINOR problems have any context to their MAJOR problems?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this is your problem by Sin+Nombre · · Score: 1

      ok please read this post this time, this is the last post im going to make: I am trying to say that the patriot act is a step towards bringing the U.S. towards korea. Which means no one from united states will be able to fight for freedom over the world. In fact the US will probably help oppressive governments oppress more efficiently. As the US starts a backwards slide, the rest of the world will probably (note the probably) follow. I may just be biased, or then again I may be thinking that helping the US will help the rest of the world. I think its quite a bit of both.

      --
      "Im such a nonconformist I'm going to not conform to the rest of you!"
      "Dude I think we just got goth-served"
  102. They filter by RESULTS, not KEYWORDS by r6144 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm Chinese and in China and can RTFA, and my friends here mostly agree that the google filter works on search results, not keywords (if you search for FaLunGong, you will certainly have some FaLunGong-related sites in the result, so the filter works in this simple case). If the search results contain unapproved sites, it will be filtered however "innocuous" the keyword may be. That's the reason why some keywords seem to be filtered for no reason --- heck, even searching for DengXiaoPing (in Chinese) fails sometimes. Of course, since this is result-dependent, whether or not a keyword seems to be blocks changes randomly with time without Chinese authorities changing anything, and it is IMHO pointless to compile a list of banned keywords.

    BTW, the government is cracking down on porn sites by asking ordinary people to help, and this action is quite popular among most people. Personally I'm indifferent to this, since although I don't visit porn sites, such cracking-downs may well extend to sites disagreeing with the Party, some of the information in which can be quite instructive to a Chinese student (even for someone who mostly supports the Party!). The ironic thing is that although hardcore porn sites are not easy to find in China, and porn is indeed illegal, it is still hard to find a news site that porn-paranoid parents can allow their children to roam freely... you need to be really careful not to stumble onto some pornographic material (or things that are obviously very unsuitable for children) on the biggest news sites.

  103. you are right by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the patriot act is a step towards north korea

    it is stupid

    but there are 2,000,000 more steps to go before we get there

    of more value is the one HUGE step towards freedom of expression by simply making what you say on the internet legal in places like china, simple dissent: in china, you can be thrown in jail for simply disagreeing with hu jintao! (their leader)

    listen to me: "george w bush is a moron"

    something i really believe

    i don't hear any knocks at my door

    so i say it again: do you see the difference between your TINY step backwards and the HUGE leap forward that can be made in china?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  104. Re:Freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My conclusion is that they're trying to filter crappy American propaganda.

    Think about it. Americans LOVE to use the word freedom.

    Yet, they don't realize how fast they're losing it.

  105. pure evil by binarybum · · Score: 1

    only a truly evil government could implement a filter that blocks the word "making" and "playboy"
    but doesn't block the word goatse.

    --
    ôó
  106. i believe... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i believe that the raging fire in your neighbor's garden that threatens to spread to your garden is more important than your aphid infestation

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  107. Re:Saw it in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, i'm in China and i can see it. Just plain old internet, no proxies or anything like that.

  108. An Open Letter to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Censor this!

    bitch shit falun sex tianwang cdjp av bignews boxun chinaliberal chinamz chinesenewsnet cnd creaders dafa dajiyuan dfdz dpp falu falun falundafa flg freechina freedom freenet fuck GCD gcd hongzhi hrichina huanet hypermart incest jiangdongriji lihongzhi making minghui minghuinews nacb naive nmis paper peacehall playboy renminbao renmingbao rfa safeweb sex simple svdc taip tibetalk triangle triangleboy UltraSurf unixbox ustibet voa voachinese wangce wstaiji xinsheng yuming zhengjian zhengjianwang zhenshanren zhuanfalun bitch fuck shit

  109. Where is Google anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did a traceroute to Google and got this:

    C:\WINDOWS>tracert www.google.com

    Tracing route to www.google.akadns.net [64.233.167.99]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 15 ms 17 ms 16 ms foobar.com
    [...snip...]
    9 66 ms 66 ms 65 ms Google.CHCGILDTGR00.bb.telus.com [154.11.3.210]
    10 66 ms 67 ms 66 ms 216.239.46.10
    11 69 ms 69 ms 68 ms 64.233.175.26
    12 67 ms 67 ms 67 ms www.google.akadns.net [64.233.167.99]

    Trace complete.

    So my local ISP has a server just for Google and even Google is not Google but rather akadns.net. WHat gives?

  110. Funny Karma by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
    And BTW funny mods don't count twoards karma

    What I'm wondering: If someone moderates my comment funny, and then someone else moderates it overrated, will my karma go down?
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:Funny Karma by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If someone moderates my comment funny, and then someone else moderates it overrated, will my karma go down?

      Yes. Some call it "Slashdot Math."

  111. Anyone translate the Chinese words in babelfish? by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

    The fish is actually pretty good at Chinese to English. Some examples follow - I'm sure you get the meanings. There's some great insults here too :-)

    Three represent | a table party | party multi- parties | party democracy | people dictatorship | politics | room self-consolation | to console blows the dreary | dreary sexual harasser | color bra | privately to cover the underpants | trousers | trousers place | private crisply to die | the crisp metamorphosis | condition younger sister to hurt | loves the younger sister pain | pain younger brother to hurt | loves the younger brother pain | pain elder sister to hurt | loves the elder sister pain | pain elder brother to hurt | hurts the elder brother pain | pain to have a sextual intercourse | Fang Dabao the | artillery to make likes | liking the sexual intercourse | sextual affection | nature doing likes | the artificial love | doing holds you | to hold Japan you | daily to approve | daily compels | The date penis | chicken I holds | holds dies | holds the breast | young penis | cloudy male genitals | positive to open the bud | bud anus | anus vagina | peduncle | cloudy meat stick | meat meat stick | meat meat hole | meat immoral woman | to swing the scrotum | cloudy testicle | to hold you | holds I | to hold inserts me | inserts you | inserts her | inserts him | to insert does you | dryly to do her | dryly to do him | to do the prostitute | prostitute | to hand over | hands over the masturbation | obscene mouth obscene | obscene anus | fart

  112. "our rights" by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i am not an american, i am ahuman being

    "our rights" apply to chinese as equal to americans according to me

    and i might add, until more people think like me, we will continue to have the problems in the world we do have

    arbitrary tribal geopolitical borders do not make a sound basis for justice, morality, or a human conscience

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  113. Re:Freedom by danila · · Score: 1

    And the USA is not a massive aggressive country with ongoing gross human rights violations and a stated desire to^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H long history of invading other democratic countries.

    You seem to be pretty confused. China didn't attack anyone, despite having several separatist territories that rightfully belong to China (though they respectfully disagree) and human rights violations in China are not that serious, once you ignore the lack of political freedom. Thus there is no reason for anyone to "liberate" them, much less the US.

    And of course there is the fact that China has nukes. The USA doesn't attack countries with nukes, as any North Korean dictator will tell you. :) Deterrence and stuff.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  114. true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in China.It's true,and what makes me angry is that even Google was blocked somedays in 2003!