Slashdot Mirror


Stress Costs U.S. $300 Billion a Year

jburroug writes "A new study, as reported in the New York Times claims that the stress of the modern always-on work environment is taking a far greater toll on the health of workers than previously believed, to the tune of $300 billion in lost productivity and increased health care costs in the U.S. alone."

418 comments

  1. Isn't that.... by ericdano · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't that the same amount that people spend on porn? Hmmm.......

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Still not what we spend on illegal drugs.

      Marijuana: My anti drug. It kills stress too.

    2. Re:Isn't that.... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Just imagine how much we'd spend on healthcare if porn was ever banned from the Internet.

    3. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None, because we'd all kill ourselves.

    4. Re:Isn't that.... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      True, but some people would probably f-it up, we are Geeks after all, and would spend the rest of their lives as invalids, sucking off the Medicare teet.

    5. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but does that shit run Linux? Well, motherfucker, does it?!?

    6. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the problem with that is?

      Mmmmm... Teats...

    7. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Marijuana: My anti drug. It kills stress too.
      Amen to that.
      And, contrary to popular opinion, I'm not a drooling idiot, but function just fine with my occasional cone to relieve stress.

    8. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uh, yes. Porn runs quite well on Linux.

    9. Re:Isn't that.... by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Weed gives me terrible panic attacks, not exactly a stress-reliever is it.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    10. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you need to try some that isn't laced with cocaine or rat poison...

    11. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It was a priority for the developers.

    12. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you're just a paniky person? Twitchers weird me out...

    13. Re:Isn't that.... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Heh. I always chuckle when I see a program that's for "managing and viewing image galleries", and there are quite a lot of them for Linux, you just know what the developer made it for :P At least one of them is upfront about it though!

    14. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same here. try hash.

    15. Re:Isn't that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh! A Democrat! That's right, you just lie back annd prop your feet up while I put in 7 14-hour days to support your lazy ass. Once we get you fed, we'll tax the shit out of me to buy you a new house. After all, we wouldnn't want you to have to suffer from any stigma rerlated to being a lazy fuckin asshole so wee won't make you use food stamps either. We will give you a "credit card" to use at the store to make sure you are fully comfortable living off hard working people like me.

  2. And they wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just today there was an article about hypertasking.
    Folks, shut off the cellphone, log out of the internet and leave work at work because you're slowly killing yourself with stress.

    1. Re:And they wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look who's talking, Mr. Posting-to-Slashdot at 11:09PM! Err...please pretend I posted this at 8:00 pm. Thanks.

    2. Re:And they wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You, my friend, seem to have never heard of time zones.

    3. Re:And they wonder why by loid_void · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is your BRAIN, this is your brain on WORK! yes, RELAX, don't do it.

      --
      Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
    4. Re:And they wonder why by soimless · · Score: 2

      then again it can allways go to thoughs little squsse balls that are made of flour and lytex

    5. Re:And they wonder why by BlueTooth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I recently dropped a self owned startup for a "corporate" job working for the DoD...for the most part security restrictions make it dificult (i.e. a hassle) to take work home...needless to say, I'm loving it. When I'm at work, I get more done, when I'm at home I get more R&R...

      --
      SPAM
    6. Re:And they wonder why by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Folks, shut off the cellphone, log out of the internet and leave work at work because you're slowly killing yourself with stress. "

      "Some people have an arm that hurts, I recommend amputation!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:And they wonder why by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      The problem is that some people won't have a job much longer if they do that. I think no having a job may be a bit more stressful than having to work at home a bit.

    8. Re:And they wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ironic, but I was listening to the radio (at 5am) and they were talking about bullies at work.

      Stay with me, it's related.

      It was about boss bullies. It mentions how some get off on pushing people around, some only do it b/c it's the only way they know, others b/c it gets work done.

      The worker could operate with a little pressure once in a while, but constant barage from a boss bully can create a stressful environment. Unfortunately, he may have been rewarded in the past b/c he was able to make some impossible due date.

      Eventually, it's assumed you'll have to make these dates/goals. It becomes a constant drive period where you work 110% all the time. This could create a resentment, anger, or "why should I work hard" attitude. Afterwards, stress becomes so overwhelming it gets one suspicious and jumpy.

      People with small heart problems will suddenly develop greater heard problems. Small conditions/ailments become problematic and increasingly dangerous.

      I currently work in a high stress environment, and I'm experiencing some of these symptoms. You can either cope with it, using escape mechanisms, face it dead on, or leave.

      Ironically, leaving an employment can be hampered down because of stress. I can see why so many drugs are on the market to help relax the stressed.

    9. Re:And they wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Illogical reasoning is an indicator that you are stressed.

    10. Re:And they wonder why by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      I don't have a cell phone, but it would help if I knew what "log out of the Internet" meant. Is that some sort of new website?

    11. Re:And they wonder why by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Um, I don't think that is really the employee's problem.

      I personally have put my foot down about "expectations" on the part of management. My wife and I had a baby and I did not want to be a "virtual dad."

      And frankly, even if it didn't work I was prepared to walk. If they are expecting the work of 2 people out of you, they should in fact be hiring 2 people, not making you feel constantly inadaquate.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    12. Re:And they wonder why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you could talk to my manager about that.. I'm one of two sysadmins at a small college, and he demands that we be available to fix any problems 24/7. Gets pretty pissy if he can't contact us via our work-provided cells.

    13. Re:And they wonder why by what+the+dumple+is · · Score: 1

      Inignot: On the moon, the weekend has advanced beyond your wildest dreams. Weekends now take up the entire week, and jobs have been phased out accordingly.

      Err: We get checks from the government. And we use them to buy beer!

    14. Re:And they wonder why by mudshark · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. The assholes managing lots of corps nowadays think that techies and geek-types are so hungry for work that they'll put up with this sort of shite.

      They *don't* own your life (that's the time you're not in the office). My ex-employer made increasing demands on my time and availability off-hours, and it turned into an ultimatum from the engineering and sysadmin/DBA staff: You want these uptime and availability numbers, then pay us to carry the "football" (be on call) and pay for the calls we take and solve. They did it, and it was a good working arrangement.

      Of course, since then I got surplused, wife and I had a daughter and now I'm a stay-at-home dad. Still a better working arrangement....

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  3. easy solution by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Funny

    just make XanaxOTC!!

    1. Re:easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously.... My head would explode if I didn't take a xanax to work every now and them.

    2. Re:easy solution by j3z_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a lot of good reasons not to.

    3. Re:easy solution by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      I keep an old prescritpion of amitriptyline in my desk drawer. It's quite out of date (1994).
      I hold on to it to remind me of the times I took work way too seriously.

  4. great... by dioscaido · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... now the fear of losing money @ the workplace due to stress will cause more stress, causing more money loss, and thereby creating a feedback loop that will kill us all.

    1. Re:great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, if you get too stressed out management will just fire you, thus ending the cycle.

    2. Re:great... by Rocky1138 · · Score: 1

      I believe what you're referring to is a recursive loop :)

    3. Re:great... by mjrpes · · Score: 1

      back in my day we referred to it as a vicious cycle :)

    4. Re:great... by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      ctrl-break?

    5. Re:great... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Oh brother. More "Strategic meetings"...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    6. Re:great... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excellent - I will now start referring to all my recursive loops as vicious cycles.

  5. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'd rather have this than a country like France's 35 hour work week and negative GDP growth and 15% unemployment.

    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather have 15% unemployment or a swelling population of overweight adults and children trying to do anything they can about stress? Would you rather work all week for a measly 12 hours of real enjoyment and happiness on Saturday?

      You may not have these problems, but then you are a member of a very small minority.

    2. Re:Meh by Ed+Thomson · · Score: 1

      There are better things to do with your life than spend all your time than increacing GDP.

    3. Re:Meh by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When you factor in all the unemployed who aren't counted (unemployed "too long", don't have a permanent address, past employer didn't pay unemployment insurance, aren't bothering to claim, not employed long enough, etc), the US might easily beat France on the REAL unemployment figures.


      Those people living like moles in the New York subways sure as hell aren't counted in the unemployment statistics, but equally they sure as hell aren't "gainfully employed" by anyone. That's a few million, right there.


      The European Union may not have the perfect system (and most of Europe holds to the 35-hour week) but they do seem to be more honest about the real cost of their system.


      If we're spending 300 billion dollars from overwork - money we're no longer earning, because a certain US President just eliminated overtime rules - then we're just burning money we don't have. We'd be better off banning the overtime and putting the money into better healthcare. We'd be paying the same, it's just that we'd be in better physical shape when we do fall ill, and the health system would be in better shape to take care of us.


      Of course, you could argue that the country is overcrowded anyway. True enough, but I'm not sure that involuntary euthanasia by excessive workloads is really the way to deal with the problem.


      I guess this could be taken by a cynic as confirming previous Slashdot articles which claimed that Republicans were mentally ill and had deficient brain activity.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Meh by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately, the US is rated 38th in business efficiency among the 188 nations recognized by the UN. Several countries with features like 35 hour work weeks, twice our number of government recognized holidays, Manditory minima of 2 weeks vacation/year, and so on are doing about as well as us

      (England, Scotland, Ireland, Denmark)

      or actually better

      (Australia, Holland, Germany, Sweden, and some smaller nations such as Iceland).

      We rank 7th in average prices, while France, for all the problems you point out is at least 15th, partially though not completly offsetting that high unemployment. France has a much higher average income tax rate (They're 5th, with an average of 50.5%, while the US is 26th, with an average of 30.5%), and I'd argue that that extra 20% is quite enough to give them their unemployment rate.

      Are the French, over all, doing worse than us? Probably yes. Are we doing the best? Probably not.
      Where did I get these numbers?

      http://www.nationmaster.com/

      (On the economic menu, several of these are in the section under ... more economic stats, instead of the main menu. Nationmaster gets its numbers from multiple sources, including the UN councel on economic development, but also the CIA's world factbook.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:Meh by ogewo · · Score: 1

      But France only has a negative GDP because countries like the US work so hard to make their produce valuable. People seem willing to do anything it takes for 20-50 years hoping that retirement for the remaining 20-50 will make it all worthwhile.

    6. Re:Meh by ogewo · · Score: 1

      To clarify: The US and similar workaholic countries are the ones that are disfunctional and are responsible for Frances poor economic state. Why should they work harder? It is the norm in many countries to work as hard as humanly possible and people are killing themselves doing it.

    7. Re:Meh by Romothecus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      GDP can be easily shown to be a falsely inflated measure of economic value and production. If one country gives mothers maternity leave, and mothers stay home and raise children, this lowers GDP in comparison to a second country where there is maternity leave and babies are cared for by hired professionals. The act of hiring and paying a professional increases GDP by the amount the professional caregiver is paid. However, all other things being equal, the actual amount of work done is no greater. All that has happened is social capital has been internalized by the market in one instance, and GDP looks higher. This is not necessarily better unless you think GDP is some magical number that makes everything better.

      In another example, let's say I spill a tanker of oil off the New England coast. Damage to the economy and value of lost oil will be arbitrarily set at $50 billion dollars. If, however, the cleanup costs are $60 billion dollars paid out to various workers to clean up the mess, then the GDP will actually increase by $10 billion dollars, despite the fact that nothing actually got produced - some idiot just made a big mess and then someone cleaned it up.

      GDP is big fat lie.

    8. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that involuntary euthanasia by excessive workloads is really the way to deal with the problem.

      Our leaders have already tackled this problem and they came up with the idea of the 20-80 society and tittytainment.

    9. Re:Meh by sgt_doom · · Score: 0

      Very aptly stated - and with the natural disasters which actually occur far greater in the USA than any other country (please note the two back-to-back hurricanes [Charley and Frances]) really drives up our GDP with the clean up aftermath.

    10. Re:Meh by sgt_doom · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should try to keep current on the news. Air support in Afghanistan over a long period of time was being provided by the French Air Force (per NATO pledge) as they had the most sophisticated aircraft that could communicate with the US military units. Also, to repeat, France hasn't jumped on the bandwagon to offshore an extreme number of IT jobs - sounds like they have some national character after all. I suggest you study the history of engineering to understand what the French have contributed to the world (not to mention their involvement in the American Revolution). Viva la truth!

    11. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yet more proof that conservatives are idiots. Congradulations on being the first in your block to buy the NEW and IMPROVED Party Line 2000! The Party Line 2000 comes complete with a gullible belief in the superiority of the American lifestyle, a reality distortion field that makes the current economic situation look like a boom time instead of the quickly approaching catastrophe it is, and a smug sense of self-importance that leads to the delusion that the two-income family has lead to a net increase in the standard of living.

      But wait, buy NOW, and you get these free gifts!

      • Sheeplevision 9000! Guaranteed to help you see nothing that will disturb your worldview!
      • Nosecandy XP! Now 85% more likely to induce "good thought".
      • Self-flaggelator XLC, for beating yourself up when you can't quite succeed in whatever task your corporate owners assign for you, you deluded slave you.
    12. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If, however, the cleanup costs are $60 billion dollars paid out to various workers to clean up the mess, then the GDP will actually increase by $10 billion dollars,

      Somebody has to work to come up with the 60billion $ to pay for the cleanup.

    13. Re:Meh by Profound · · Score: 1

      That site is scary, check this graph out:

      http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_exp_dol_fi g

    14. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should try to keep current on the news. Air support in Afghanistan over a long period of time was being provided by the French Air Force (per NATO pledge) as they had the most sophisticated aircraft that could communicate with the US military units.

      Who the fuck said anything about that? WHO CARES?

      Also, to repeat, France hasn't jumped on the bandwagon to offshore an extreme number of IT jobs - sounds like they have some national character after all.

      Again who cares? It's obvious they are into protectionism, among other things considering how well le pen does over there.

      I didn't bring that up, obviously France needs a better educational system if you are a product of it.

      I suggest you study the history of engineering to understand what the French have contributed to the world (not to mention their involvement in the American Revolution). Viva la truth!

      I suggest you study HISTORY itself to understand what America has contributed to the world. Then go kill yourself. thx.

    15. Re:Meh by Romothecus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Precisely. But GDP does not care about what end to which work is put - only the amount of work. Remember 1984 - "goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed."

      So in our hypothetical oil spill, the GDP measures the entire process as a positive effect, when in reality it is simply correcting a disaster. Do you really think it helps the economy to go around creating natural disasters and then spending vast sums of money cleaning them up?

      By the same argument, littering is good for the economy, because someone has to be hired to clean up the mess. Vandalism is good for the economy. Perceptions of a lack of security are good for the economy - guards must be hired to create "security."

      GDP fails to take into account if work is being put towards a useful goal. $10 billion net GDP gain from cleaning up spilled oil is not the same as $10 billion net GDP gain from employing engineers to design more effecient car engines.

  6. OMG! 300 Billion?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a lot of money... how will we pay that... oh no oh no oh no....

  7. Gad! by ir0b0t · · Score: 1, Funny

    I need a drink!! **

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
  8. Stressful by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Geez, what a depressing and stressful article.

  9. price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Being the most powerful, wealthiest nation in the world has a price.

    1. Re:price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Yeah, the price is work your ass off for a corporation and ruin your health. Then wind up with no health care benefits, no retirement, and a job that pays just enough to pay the mortgage as long as you don't eat. Benefits: a killer resume that will get you turned down every time cause because you have experience they'd have to pay you for if they still did in this country what you used to do at work. Hell yes! 4 more. Might as well get everybody f**ked instead of just a chosen few.

    2. Re:price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I plan to commit suicide in the next week. But I'm going to do it well. I'll march onto an elementary school playground when they're all gathered up together, and place a shotgun under my chin. It'll be nice to know I've helped make a difference in some people's lives.

  10. people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's because people in the US tend to work to much (sometimes for less money). Hope this shows the rest of the world not to follow that trend in favor of some inexistent productivity benefit.

    1. Re:people in the US work too much by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Well people in INdia work just as hard for 1/6th the cost of me.

      Now explain to me that I work to much or I am as efficient.

      I have a right to work as hard as possible or lose my job to someone else who will work just as hard for less.

    2. Re:people in the US work too much by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 1

      I don't and never will buy that fallacy. We are suppose to believe that we have the worst school system in the world (well almost) and then all of a sudden when one enters the workforce we work harder/smarter/better/longer then everyone else in the world. Blah...

      I work with a lot of different people from many different countries and have nothing but the highest regard for my international colleagues. Whether it's France/China/Germany/Russia/Greece/Spain/England/J apan (in no particular order and not intending to leave anyone out) they work hard now, they worked hard then, and I'll have to put in even more hours if I want to keep up with them in the future.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    3. Re:people in the US work too much by Carmelia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I have a right to work as hard as possible or lose my job to someone else who will work just as hard for less."

      You call that a right? I call that a burden.
      The parent probably meant that he doesn't have to work his ass off to be assured of not loosing his job.

      Also, you could work a lot (60+ hours a week) and still be half as efficient as a 35-40 hours worker, due to stress, fatigue and whatnot.

    4. Re:people in the US work too much by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No the studies show that after 40 little work is done but its never half as efficient as 35-40 hours.

      But I am serious. I am overworked but if I slack I seriously will lose my job.

      Its a sad world we live in but I go to school too and need to put food on the table. All I know is if I do not work over 40 hours things wont get done and my boss will be wondering what I am doing if I am not working regular hours(as in 60).

      I will be replaced but what can I do?

      If the economy improves I could tell my boss to hire more people or quit and find anyone else. But now I am thankfull I do not flip burgers at this point.

      The market is directly manipulated. Either by CEO's or workers. Unions have a bad label because they manipulate prices but its somehow ok if executives lobby the government to bring in H1B1 Visa's and give tax breaks to outsource so I have to compete with billions now for my job. This oversupplies the market and lowers the cost I work and gives an incentive to overwork sine someone else will be happy to do it.

      Its not fair indeed.

    5. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not working regular hours(as in 60).

      12 hours a day is 'regular'? Nice troll. Whoever moderated this up is on crack.

    6. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the real world. 60 hours a week isn't that unusual, a lot of companies "strongly recommend" it.

    7. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nd I'll have to put in even more hours if I want to keep up with them in the future

      Wait, so you're saying they work more efficiently than you, and you need to put in more hours to do the same work? If that's the case, they probably do have better educations.

      The US school system is obviously one of the better ones since so many countries can't even offer schooling to the whole population, but it's no match for the best in the world. Our very best schools are competitive, our average ones are poor by comparison, and our worst schools are practically useless. Can't afford the good private schools or the high property values in towns with good public schools? Then that just sucks for you.

    8. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *shrug* I've done okay with my public school education. Motivation, determination, and good work ethic are bigger factors in success than where your diploma came from.

    9. Re:people in the US work too much by randyest · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm sorry, really. You've some serious replies already. But I can't resist the troll. You mean:

      too much

      . . . and . . .

      non-existent

      Work a bit harder on that spelling and grammar before you try to show "the world" what trend to follow.



      --
      everything in moderation
    10. Re:people in the US work too much by Myolp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In Sweden, and I think this also applies to several other European countries, we have laws that prevents a company from firing its staff without a valid reason. I.e., they can't fire you for arguing with your boss, or not working overtime, etc. Also, when they need to cut back on the staff, its a first-in-last-out rule that is applied to decide who will stay and who will get fired. And you're not allowed to work more than 200 hours overtime per year (exceptions can be made though). Everyone have at least 5 weeks vacation each year, and you always have the right to use at least four of these during the summer. If you get a kid, you have 1 years paid parental leave. Would you like to take a year of to study something? Sure thing, every employee can take one years off as long as they will be studying full time, and you get your job back when your done. Is your kid sick, don't worry, you can stay home and take care off him/her without risk loosing your job.

      Working in Sweden is quite sweet...

    11. Re:people in the US work too much by danila · · Score: 1

      "Motivation, determination, and good work ethic" are important but they do not determine productivity directly. They influence whether you will WANT to work, but education/training (and experience) determine how well you CAN work.

      I had a great education, so I can be extremely productive, but I don't want to be that way - I'd rather slack and have fun doing whatever tickles my fancy right now (including doing nothing at all). Fortunately, one doesn't need to work all the time to have enough money. I think if more people realise it and understand that working 20 or so hours can be enough, the world will be a happier place (the Western world, that is - developing countries need to work harder to build up capital).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    12. Re:people in the US work too much by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I think if more people realise it and understand that working 20 or so hours can be enough, the world will be a happier place

      And the beauty of that is if everyone does it, we may reach a new equilibrium where you don't get left behind for working 'only' 20 hours a week.

      We have tractors, we have trains, we have telephones and printing presses. It's about time mankind realized it isn't still growing grain all day long to survive the winter. The only busy industries these days should be education, sports and space colonization. ;)

      Do your bit for humanity, I say - don't let your staff work too hard!

      -Harmony.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    13. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pussy. I like my job.

      Many times I have been going to school full time AND have 2 part time jobs to mess around with. I happily work 60 hour weeks.

      It's not that big of deal, I don't work for money. I do jobs that I like. Hell half of what I do I'd do for free. I get more techinical stuff done in my basement in my free time then other people get done in their day jobs.

      It's fun. I like my job. Most people wouldn't work if they had to, but the people I generally deal with would work jobs even if they won the lottery (after a long ass vacation though!).

      Working more hours doesn't nessicarially make you more productive. God knows I've been burned out a couple times. I just avoid it, nowadays.

      However on average Americans work more hours AND are more productive PER hour then most other countries in the world.

      It's a double wammy.

      Maybe except for Japan.

      I like my job. I've worked jobs that I've hated, but during that time period I continously looked for other things I could do for a living. If all that was avaible is shit jobs, then I'd work a shit job. Then maybe my productivity would start to blow.

      Stress sucks but it has alot less to do with how many hours you work then YOUR ATTITUDE. I've seen people who only have to work part time jobs that were so fucking stressed out you wouldn't beleive it.

      Shitty attitude is going to make your life suck even if your a millionare.

      I am so tired of this bullshit. People act like American's businesses are so crooked and that's why our country is filthy rich, but it's realy more to do with hard working and creativity then anything else.

      But I suppose most of you are fucking socialists anyways. Lamers.

      Just remember that in America we may have many super large corporations, but they only account for 25 of the work force. 75% of the workforce works for small businesses and they contribute to over 50% of the national GNP.

    14. Re:people in the US work too much by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      But running a business there doesn't sound like it is.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    15. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet oddly enough, Sweden is not collapsing under the burden. The owner of Ikea is the richest man in the world!

    16. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you work 60 hour weeks, go to school full time, and still have time to post long ass messages on slashdot. You obviously need a fraction of the sleep of what is recommended for adult humans. Congrats, you're a freak of nature.

    17. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet oddly enough, Sweden is not collapsing under the burden. The owner of Ikea is the richest man in the world!

      I know one guy who worked at Ikea, and heard of many more. In North-America, Ikea takes full advantage of the 'local laws' and could be compared with Wall-Mart or Target in the way workers are treated (near minimum wages, minimum breaks, ...).

      I wonder what stores are most profitable? Ikea in Sweenden or Ikea in the U.S.?

    18. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is profit the motive? I thought the motive of economic rationalism was the maximisation of GDP and not the destruction of the very people that GDP serves. If you think about it, if we want to maximise GDP, which in turn increases living standards, we actually will have zero profit taken by business.

      So which country's labor laws are better?

    19. Re:people in the US work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is the economic ranking of Sweden and Europe? hrmmm. I think I am seeing a pattern.....

      The US is the #1 economy for a reason.

    20. Re:people in the US work too much by aricusmaximus · · Score: 1

      X years from now, what do you think are the odds a top economic ranking is will give you comfort on your death-bed?

      How about the fact that we have twice the infant mortality rate than Sweden ? Or that we have twice the obesity rate of Sweden?

      Anecdote: My friend has a step-mother who never will have to work another day in her life -- she gets $100K/year just from sitting around and collecting real-estate income. The woman is neurotic beyond belief (hypochondria being the most prominent proble), is unahappily devorced, has spotty relations with her children.

      We try to stay #1 economically. Consider that may not be the best end goal.

  11. i'm a conservative by HBI · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously.

    However, I have to wonder what a high GDP growth and near-full employment are worth if you are dead.

    Obviously there is a problem with ANY form of social engineering - it's untested, and has unpredictable results on society. We conservatives say this in response to welfare programs and affirmative action. Modern capitalism and the downsizing trend have social effects. That's not subject to argument. Instead of a knee-jerk conservative 'but it could damage productivity' response, how about taking a look at the problems instead?

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:i'm a conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I consider myself fiscally conservative (if that matters). I am a self-employed consultant in two different fields (digital imaging and programming). I work hard when I'm working, but when I'm not working, I don't even check my email. I like to work a few hours a day including weekends, but I don't like to work more than 7-8 hours a day.

      My view is: nobody forces you to work as hard as you possibly can. So if you don't want to, don't. You're not lazy, or "French", or whatever, as long as you are making enough to keep from depending on others for anything, and you lead the lifestyle you want.

      Sure, some might look down their nose at you if you "only" work 35 or 40 hours a week, or if you take every Friday off. But you shouldn't structure your lifestyle to suit your friends. Find friends that understand your lifestyle. The more people that do this, the more employers will support it and you don't have to resort to being self-employed if you don't want to do that.

      I think that's the conservative viewpoint: don't like working so hard? Then work less!

    2. Re:i'm a conservative by Siniset · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "as long as you are making enough to keep from depending on others for anything"

      I know this was a side comment, but i do take issue with this sort of attitude. You depend on so many people during your day, that it can boggle the mind. Just imagine how many people you rely on to have that roof over your head, or that car in your driveway, or the fact that you are educated, and are able to be self-employed.

      "The more people that do this, the more employers will support it and you don't have to resort to being self-employed if you don't want to do that."

      Isn't that what unions try to do?

    3. Re:i'm a conservative by XanC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a huge difference between:

      1) hiring the labor of others with your own hard-earned canned labor (money)

      and

      2) waiting around for a handout to be able to hire that same labor.

      The kind of dependency he's talking about is #2.

    4. Re:i'm a conservative by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I think that's the conservative viewpoint: don't like working so hard? Then work less!

      I absolutly agree. Its hard for us that aren't consultants to do that, but ad a fiscal conservative I say thats our damn problem. Personally I work M-F 9-5 and then Friday and Saturday nights. Is it unhealthy? Absolutly. However, I can't stand have 30k in student loans and 2 jobs means twice the contacts in the industry.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After viewing that, I think I've just raised the cost of stress by another few thousand dollars.

  13. U.S. $300 Billion a Year... by danidude · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...does not pay my health.

    --
    - no sig.
  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Go tell it to the Europeans by Cryofan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....with their 4-6 weeks of vacations and holidays each year. We work about 25% more per year than do most Europeans.

    I really do not understand why we Americans have let ourselves be brainwashed into SweatShopAmerica.

    See my sig for links on how the social democracies of Europe fought and are still fighting for a better , less stressful workplace, for universal healthcare, and for a social welfare state/safety net that lets them less afraid of losing their jobs.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, what a disgusting pile of shit you are. Here's a GMail invite for you, scumbag!

    2. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ....with their 4-6 weeks of vacations and holidays each year. We work about 25% more per year than do most Europeans. I really do not understand why we Americans have let ourselves be brainwashed into SweatShopAmerica.

      My employer does a fair amount of business in Europe or with European based companies. Everytime a customer from this continent comes up, we always talk about the numerous weeks of vacation and whatnot.

      People always end up talking about the "high" unemployment rate and the "high" taxes, but they always wistfully look on the health care and 3x vacation....but then they drive home in their 2nd or 3rd car (sometimes an SUV) to a home that's twice as big as they need to their big screen TV that they paid for with a bonus check that could have been put to retirement....

      As long as we Americans want our toys and things, we'll never get get 6 weeks vacation....

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    3. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      It's more than that depending on where you look. Parts of Europe, like France, have mandated 35-hour work weeks, whereas in the US most fulltime jobs are 40-45 hours a week. The motivation for shorter work weeks there is reducing unemployment. The theory is that you can have 7 hours working 40 hours a week or 8 working 35, so the latter is preferable because it employs more people. The problem is that if you pay the employees the same amount per hour, those 8 employees each make 12.5% less per year; and if you pay them the same amount per week (i.e. more per hour), those 8 employees cost the employer 14.2% more per year. Which is why all these short work week initiatives aren't doing much to control unemployment in the parts of Europe which feature them: the unions force employers to reduce hours but not benefits or pay, which increases costs and decreases employers' ability to employ workers. Thus the 7 35-hour employees in Europe would cost about as much as 7 40-hour employees in the US, and there goes the supposed motivation for hiring an extra worker.

      Now I'm not trying to claim that Europeans don't work hard enuogh, or that American's don't work too hard. As it happens I do think that most Americans are being... "encouraged," let's say, to work too hard. I just want to illustrate that this is not a simple problem, and that even small changes, made for the best reasons, can have negative consequences. This is something we need to think very carefully about or we run the risk of ruining our economy - and probably the entire world's along with it.

    4. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by servognome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ironicly this is posted labor day weekend... why do we have labor day in september? Because the goverment felt we needed a token holiday during the 3 month period between 4th of July and Columbus day (which I think most places besides federal goverment ignore)
      The US may have the most "stuff" but we pay for it with our health. We buy a $5000 plasma TV to get our minds off the stress of all the work we need to do to afford a $5000 plasma TV.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The interesting thing is that the number of hours work and productivity are not neccesarily related. I think in some companies at lot of hours are put in, but the results are not untilmately benificial. Enron was renowned in Houston for how hard working the employees were.

      I think what we have brainwashed into believing those who work the most are the most dedicated, when in fact they may just be the least effecient, or, possible, the least qualified to do the job. Or pehaps the employer will not pay for the proper tools because he or she knows that the employee will donate the time neccesary to compensate for the substandard equipment. I am in a situation like that right now. Crappy cheap web designer are costing me a few hours a week of free time.

      One last point. Healthcare and vacations should pay for themselves. A healthier worker will be more effectient. However, this only matters when the company is worried about the long term viability of the worker and has to pay for the long term care of the worker. Neither is that true in the current situation. The pay for unskilled labor is low enough so it does not matter if the worker is not effecient. Skilled labor is often on salary, so it often does not matter if all the labor is inexperienced and takes 25% more time. Health care is largely oursourced to the middle class, through taxes and insurance payments, so that is not a big issue either.

      the belabored point from above is that Sweatshop America is realy TemporaryJobAmerica, in which companies hire on an as needed basis, works the employer as hard as possible, and then throws the employee away as soon as the job is done.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I've heard somewhere that if we wanted the same level of wellfare as a century ago, we'd only have to work 2hrs/week.

      (redundant disclaimer: it's hear-say)

      Anyway with all that unemployment, I wonder how many work there IS worldwide. Divide that by the number of people living on the planet (minus children etc), and maybe you'll get a 20hrs of work per week?

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    7. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is more productive in terms of costs. Not work involved.

      Efficiently is calculated by cost per work returned for that cost. I agree an overworked worker is not as efficient as working regular hours for the cost of 2 workers it just may not be efficient. Especially in this tight job market and economy.

      Businesses view employers as expenses and cost centers. They need to be cut because they get in the way of profits. Sadly this is why the stock market has gone up as of recent. Its because despite the recession businesses are hiring Indians and having 1 person do the job of 3. This saves alot of money.

    8. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      4-6 weeks of vacations and holidays? I consider that fairly typical, even here in the US. For most companies, 10 days (2 weeks) of holidays is standard, and I would consider 2 weeks of vacation to be fairly standard as well, and many offer more.

    9. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We work about 25% more per year than do most Europeans.

      And you still have to shop at Wal*Mart.

      Think about it. It's not like Europeans have a low standard of living. They get paid well, they get great vacations, they get great social benefits. WTF are you thinking, working harder for less?! Something is wrong in America.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    10. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by jburroug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right something is wrong over here, which is why I submitted the story.

      WTF are you thinking, working harder for less?!

      The answer to that is simple: I want a job. It's pretty much impossible to negotiate for a shorter work week for a professional job here. Beleive me, I've tried. When I got hired on at my current job I actually asked if I could get double vacation (4 weeks) or a seven hour work day if I took pay cut, my request was met with a confused stare and a refusal. I was honestly afraid that even by just asking I'd lose the offer because management would then assume that I wasn't a 'team player.' I should point out that the company I work for is considered liberal by US standards - a paid lunch break is factored into our work schudules, which is almost unheard of in the US these days. And we get to leave early on the day before a holiday.

      Still though, I often find myself badgering co-workers to leave on time almost daily. Since I work 10-6:30 (thanks to clients out west we need extended hours) instead of the normal 8:30-5 I know when everyone leaves. Waaay too often they'll inist on staying till they finish "one last thing" which costs them an hour of personal time they won't ever get back. Thus increasing their stress, and their health care costs and raises the insurnce premiums we all pay. So sad. Also makes it harder for me to goof off ala Bonjour Paresse :-)

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    11. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is something what I've been wondering for a while. Having American relatives and seen the work environment, it's hard for me to understand why do you accept the situation ?

      The vacation difference is one thing, but I think the problems in every day living are even worse. Sure, you get paid about half more, but you're also expected to work half more. And for what; to buy some more gizmos? Considering the (much) higher costs of living (housing, medical care, kids), more gizmos and cars is this just about the only things you're getting. In return you're giving up 2-3 hours of time for your family and for yourself EVERY DAY!

      And if I consider my work (R&D field), I don't I could get much more done by spending couple of more hours at work. Or by doing couple of hours after dinner. There is only so much effective working time in day, and being tired and unfocused just doesn't cut it for me.

      Well, I guess it's about what you wan't from life, but frankly I don't understand your choices.

    12. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1



      This is an aside to your post really. I don't have so much experience of working in the States, but anecdotal evidence I've picked up from Americans over here suggests that during our predominantly fewer working hours, the Europeans are more energetic in their work (read: slack less). This seems to tie into the original article nicely.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    13. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      And you still have to shop at Wal*Mart.

      Weird, isn't it? The US economy is staggering in world terms. We hear that all the time. Yet, for the people within the US, their purchasing power isn't wildly different. There are other factors, such as the massive availablity of land, that change things such as the size of your typical house, but broadly speaking, the average US citizen isn't much better off than a european counterpart. And judging by the other posts in this thread, he works a bit harder for it too.

      It's ridiculous to say the money isn't there. We have modern farming equipment, manufacturing, transport. So why aren't we all just sitting back and enjoying the rewards of a few centuries of technological development?

      I think one difference is formed by what the typical citizens of a country are doing. We all compete with each other. The US citizen may be vastly richer than an eastern european, an indian or a chinese, but he lives in a land where everybody else is too. It's not possible to ease off and do a twenty-hour week because you'd get left behind. Our equilibrium is set at 37+ hours.

      But that's not to say that there couldn't be another euqilibrium lower down if everyone typically worked 20 hours a week. A parallel situation would be how there used to be only one breadwinner in a household (typically the husband) and now there are two. Living costs go up and it's now much harder for there to just be a single breadwinner. We've adopted a different equilibrium, just like we've failed to adopt a different equilibrium as technology has progressed.

      I think this has led to a reduction in the amount of work that 'needs' to be done. Assuming technology continues to progress and civilization doesn't slide back again, then this situation can only get more pronounced. Energy required to hold onto a job will continue to increase and benefits to the employee will continue to shrink as the 'owners' have less and less need to for them and the balance of power shifts further.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    14. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by sgt_doom · · Score: 0

      I fear the gains in "productivity" aren't really understood. Two primary measures of productivity: number of American workers and the cost of labor. With offshoring you go from 10 American workers to 6 - thus lower number and greater productivity plus lower cost of labor. Too bad they don't count those 10 Indians or 20 Chinese in the equation......

    15. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by lsmeg · · Score: 1
      People always end up talking about the "high" unemployment rate and the "high" taxes, but they always wistfully look on the health care and 3x vacation....but then they drive home in their 2nd or 3rd car (sometimes an SUV) to a home that's twice as big as they need to their big screen TV that they paid for with a bonus check that could have been put to retirement....

      As long as we Americans want our toys and things, we'll never get get 6 weeks vacation....

      I agree with that last statement, though keep in mind that for a great many people in this country, that big screen TV and home that's twice as big as they need isn't paid for with a bonus check, but instead with increasing debt. It's not neccessarily that pepole in this country just make a lot of money and like our toys. A lot of people really spend more money than they can comfortably afford.

      I have seen many people house shop by figuring the maximum amount they could spend per month on a mortgage, then go out and buy the biggest house that will cost them that much. And then you get a 3 person family (with little to no intent to grow) living in a 5 bedroom, 3 bathroom house.

      And that big screen TV was likely bought because Best Buy was offering "0 payments, 0% interest for 12 months!!!", and they just couldn't pass it up.

      But I agree, our mentality of wanting toys tends to override our want for lower stress in our lives, even if it means spending more than we can afford. For a lot of peple, toys are simply a higher priority than low stress...

      [ end rant on US debt culture :) ]

      --
      It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
    16. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking that working harder in the US gets you bigger houses is a falacy. Land is cheap in the US compared to Europe. The US is almost giving it away! An acre of land that is suitable for developement in E.g. the UK would cost nearly half a million, sterling. In the US it isn't unusual to pick up several acres for a couple of tens of thousand, US. The price I paid for the hous eI'm sat in now would have bought me two houses in the US both with at least an acre of land. So by my standards, I could work less and still buy that nice big house and the three cars.

    17. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Radar|TGS · · Score: 1

      The vacation they give you is *paid* vacation time. There's nothing stopping you from taking additional time off, you just wouldn't get paid for it. There's your pay cut. Problem solved.

    18. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      I really do not understand why we Americans have let ourselves be brainwashed into SweatShopAmerica

      I'll tell you why. I've reached this conclusion recently. It may not be a unique point of view, but for what it's worth (which may not be much) I came up with it myself, not just parroting some other point of view.

      Anyway, let's accept for starters that when people work more/harder, they accomplish more. Some will debate this by arguing the "work smarter not harder" paradigm, but I would claim that all things being equal, those who work harder and longer (and uncut?) accomplish more.

      Well, herein lies the difference between much of Europe and the US, in terms of mentality. As a group, the Europeans are generally content with remaining where they are. If you work 36 hours a week and have a month of vacation, you're saying "yeah we'll take it easy. Do a little work here and there, but mainly we'll just focus on everyone working less so that more people will have to be employed and each one stresses less."

      In America, the culture ends up basically saying "everyone should/will work as much as he can." Sometimes this seems silly, especially when there's relatively high unemployment, but basically it says that as a group, we put pressure on ourselves to crank out as much as possible.

      To me that means we're still a young country, unwilling to rest on our accomplishments. We still want to work work work and do more than anyone else. And this is a good sign to me.

      Think of it this way. Would you rather work for a big slow established firm where everyone worked 9 to 5 with an hour for lunch, or would you rather work in a hungry new upstart where people were working tons more hours because the company was about to roll out a kick-ass product that is going to bring the old established firms to their knees?

      Maybe it's my youth speaking (and hell, I thrive on pressure, anyway), but I'll take the new upstart over the stuffy old company any time.

      Even though there will be more hours to put in.

      The fact that American culture is still closer to that of a young upstart than a stuffy old company makes me happy to live in this country. Given that we're the most dominant country in the world and we still believe in working hard and doing more, making more, bodes well.

      The 36 hours a week and a month vacation stuff sounds pretty complacent from a social point of view.

      I'll take my 3 weeks vacation and a more dynamic attitude, personally.

    19. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      the belabored point from above is that Sweatshop America is realy TemporaryJobAmerica, in which companies hire on an as needed basis, works the employer as hard as possible, and then throws the employee away as soon as the job is done.

      Part of the reason American businesses can stay competitive is that they can shed workers quickly when business falls off, add them back when...now "if"...business picks up again. And that would be fine if those laid off people had health insurance during the down time and we're able to get decent day care so they could work a lower paying job if it came along while they were looking for a better one.

      Not sure a shorter work week is going to help the problem because so few of us over here work jobs that even qualify for a 40 hour week. Wal-Mart keeps their employee hours to less then 30 so they don't have to pay for any benefits. With the changes in the overtime rules more Americans than ever qualify to be worked more hours at the same pay, including nurses. I'm not really cranked about getting meds from a nurse who may be on the tail end of a 12 hour shift, it's going to be really scary to think that same nurse might be on their fourth or fifth 12 hour day in a row.

      I don't have all the answers but I'm certain things can't keep going on like they are. And I'm certain if we put Bush back in office then big companies are going to be writing the work rules for another four years. Just like the drug companies wrote the prescription drug benefit. What a surprise that the biggest benefits went to the drug companies. What sucks is I'm not sure Kerry would be able to make any big changes even if he beats the long odds. He would still have work with a divided House and Senate.

      Either way it pretty much looks like we're screwed.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    20. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by jburroug · · Score: 1

      The vacation they give you is *paid* vacation time. There's nothing stopping you from taking additional time off, you just wouldn't get paid for it. There's your pay cut. Problem solved.

      That's true if your employer will let you take several weeks of unpaid leave without firing you. It's not uncommmon for people here in the US to lose their jobs because health problems force them to miss too much work. If many employers don't have a problem letting people go because of health related absenteeism how receptive do you think they'll be to the idea of letting people take an extra few weeks off "just for the hell of it"?

      Unfortunatly we live in a culture of work here, not a culture of living. Doing things to enhance the quality of your life, at the expense of being a team player at the office are looked down upon and actively discouraged.

      Now in all fairness my current employer would give me extra unpaid time off, or make other unusual arrangements, if something freaky happened and I had to be away. I know I'd have my job waiting if I had to take a month or more off to take care of a sick family member or something. But if I asked for the same time off to go hang out in Greece to chill for a while I'd be laughed at. For the vast majority of Americans it's just plain impossible to arrange European style working conditions, no matter what sacrafices in pay you're willing to make.

      --
      "Listen: We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" - Kurt Vonnegut
    21. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I got hired on at my current job I actually asked if I could get double vacation (4 weeks) or a seven hour work day if I took pay cut, my request was met with a confused stare and a refusal.

      YEAH!!!! I've had the same thing happen, but the self-determination to work less is EXACTLY what I want. That's the American way - not manditory 35 hour work weeks, not six weeks forced vacation. It should be THE EMPLOYEE'S choice to work as much or as little as they want. In so many jobs, I'd have been happy with half-time hours and half-time pay, because I'd still live comfortably, but I'd have time to pursue the important things after hours. It's time to open managers' eyes to this - they DO have the power to make exceptions; we, the employees, need to take back our schedules.

    22. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      See my sig for links on how the social democracies of Europe fought and are still fighting for a better , less stressful workplace, for universal healthcare, and for a social welfare state/safety net that lets them less afraid of losing their jobs.

      Europe is in for a rude awakening. The US has had roughly 140,000 trooops scattered about them since WWII. WE are their standing armies for the most part. Sure, each country has their own defence, but they don't spend nearly as much money on it as they would have to if we weren't there.

      And we're pulling out too. Current plans call for 70,000 troops to vacate since we're not terribly worried about a war right there right now. We've got other issues to deal with.

      Once we do that the EU contries have two choices:
      - Take their chances.
      or
      - Actually spend money on their defense.

      They'll have to pick between the Socialist feel-good insane welfare programs that they have over there and their national defense.
    23. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Defense from who? If I were Norway or France, the attacker I'd be most afraid of is the USA.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    24. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you thinking, working harder for less?! Something is wrong in America.

      Atleast in America, people make more then 1cent a day. I'm sure kids in singapore work alot harder for less.

    25. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      Defense from who? If I were Norway or France, the attacker I'd be most afraid of is the USA.


      Right...

      The last time the US invaded Europe unprovoked was...? Never

      The last time Europe erupted in war was ...? 1939

      The time before THAT that Europe last erupted in war was... ? 1914

      Didn't the Soviets try and invade Finland at one time? The Winter War IIRC.

      Kosovo/Bosnia ring a bell?

      If Europe can keep itself from getting into a gigantic shit storm for a period of 300 years maybe I'd think they could tone down their defenses. Fact of the matter is they ALWAYS end up fighting one another. Hey, not my problem, kill eachother if you want but we're getting the heck out of there because we've got more important things to do than babysit the world's immature children.
    26. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by jschottm · · Score: 1

      ---
      I actually asked if I could get double vacation (4 weeks)
      ---

      Look into state government jobs. In Virginia, a first year salaried employee earns one vacation day per month worked, plus ~15 paid holidays (depending one which day certain holidays fall on), plus 4 personal days, plus 10 sick days. That works out to about 2 months off per year. I make less than I would in a private company, but I get alot more time off (many people I know in similar positions to mine in local companies get 15 days a year off total). That's worth a lot to me.

      If you make a career out of it, the leave just goes up and up - for every 5 years of service, add 3 days of leave. So if you've lasted 20 years in any series of jobs working for VA, you'd be getting 53 days off per year.

    27. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The last time the US invaded Europe unprovoked was...?

      Brilliant reasoning. Nothing can happen unless there has been a precedent - but how the hell did it happen the first time then? Why was US concerned about Soviet Union, after all, when was the last time they had invaded the US?

      1939, 1914

      The years that remind Europe that war is hell - and the US that war is a great thing. The militant nationalism and glorification of war that are going on in the US make me thankful that we're separated by an ocean.

      Didn't the Soviets try and invade Finland at one time?

      Soviets are gone, in case you didn't notice.

      Kosovo/Bosnia ring a bell?

      Oh yeah, the WW3 where the Kosovars and Bosnians nearly conquered the rest of Europe. Hey wait, that was in alternate reality. On this planet I was absolutely amazed that we got rid of the Soviet Union with a civil war in just one country.

      Fact of the matter is they ALWAYS end up fighting one another.

      Fact of the matter is that your skull has been filled with urine.

    28. Re:Go tell it to the Europeans by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      WE are their standing armies for the most part.

      That's because most EU armies are training organizations for the Big One that hopefully will never come. You don't draft 10% of the population into an army (like the plan was in Finland, some others thought less was enough) without a damn good reason, like foreign forces crossing the border or imminent threat of same.

      The beauty of this system is that it is cheaper during the peace and during the war you get both the maximal bang and maximal bang for the buck. No, don't start praising the professional armies - they are more skilled, but for the same resources, they are miniscule. Sure, for biggest countries even that is enough to overrun pathetic third world dictatorships, but anyone whose threat scenario is a third world dictatorship doing mumble doesn't have real threats.

      They'll have to pick between the Socialist feel-good insane welfare programs that they have over there and their national defense.

      Bwahahaha! Tell me, where's the threat that the current EU national defence is insufficient to counter? Right, there isn't one. US troops can leave tomorrow and no-one needs to care.

      --

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
  16. Death Benifits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "jburroug writes "A new study, as reported in the New York Times claims that the stress of the modern always-on work environment is taking a far greater toll on the health of workers than previously believed, to the tune of $300 billion in lost productivity and increased health care costs in the U.S. alone.""

    What health care?

    Lost productivity? Is that anything like "lost sales"?

  17. Garumph by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem about anything that surveys the economic losses caused by productivity losses is that they're all vague measurements of approxiamate things that are then multiplied by a huge group of people. Really, what this means is that while there might be truth in the idea these statistics try to show, the numbers are almost completely bullshit. For example, let's suppose 100 million workers in the united states have air blowing hand dryers instead of paper towels in their restrooms. These dryers take longer than paper towels, let's say maybe a minute instead of 10 seconds. I would think it's fair to say that on average a worker makes 1.5 trips to the bathroom per day. So if the average hourly wage of these employees is something like 15 bucks, 10 seconds of paper towels is worth $0.0417, one minute of air drying is worth $0.25. That means that we're wasting ~$31 Million per day! That's billions per year! My God! Something has to be done!

    1. Re:Garumph by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "These dryers take longer than paper towels, let's say maybe a minute instead of 10 seconds. I would think it's fair to say that on average a worker makes 1.5 trips to the bathroom per day."

      That's assuming that people wash their hands when they're done. If you've ever watched the people that finish up and leave, you'd know better.

      Yeah, I'm the freaky guy that stands in the bathroom watching everyone else.

    2. Re:Garumph by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with your point about statistics being used for vague and innappropriate ends. I, personally have a copy of Darrell Huff's "How to lie with Statistics." (the 39th printing, no less...) published by W.W. Norton, ISBN number: 039309426X.
      It is a very intersting book with does address your point about vague measurements being used for whatever ends the user intends.

      However, I think you are missing the larger point of the article in that it intends to continue the discussion of: are Americans working too hard?

      Case in point here is the idea of the curve of diminishing returns. Can you ever recall a time when you worked so many hours that you were less productive or tires/stressd-out as a result? Where, if you had merely done job X over two 4 hours shifts instead of one 10 hour shift you could have done the same amount of work with less stress and/or fatigue, and in less work hours? I'll bet you probably have.

      I don't know if I have the all the answeres to job stress, but I think it's fair to say that, sometimes, there are other ways to get work done that may be easier on people than just plowing/trudging through no matter how long it takes.

      .

      --
      uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
    3. Re:Garumph by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Well that's really what I meant when I said that there might be truth in the ideas. The idea that stress makes you less productive is certainly something worth discussing, and I happen to agree with it. The statistic(s), however, is rather worthless.

    4. Re:Garumph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think it's fair to say that on average a worker makes 1.5 trips to the bathroom per day.

      My employer asked me to stop taking those half trips to the bathroom. :(

    5. Re:Garumph by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Caught peeing in the coffee, eh?

    6. Re:Garumph by FFFish · · Score: 1

      I would think it's fair to say that on average a worker makes 1.5 trips to the bathroom per day. ... My God! Something has to be done!

      Yah! Send search parties after those poor bastards who made a half-trip... they must have fallen down the hole!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    7. Re:Garumph by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, I'm the freaky guy that stands in the bathroom watching everyone else.

      You call that freaky? I use a hidden camera for that.

      ...

      (just kidding people)

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    8. Re:Garumph by chip_s_ahoy · · Score: 1

      I really hate slipping in what those guys leave .5 of the way to the bathroom.

      Yeah, I know, childish.

    9. Re:Garumph by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      That's assuming that people wash their hands when they're done. If you've ever watched the people that finish up and leave, you'd know better.

      As a Swede who have been an exchange student in Australia, I'd say my experience is that 95% of Swedish men wash their hands after taking a piss, compared to 50% of Australian men.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    10. Re:Garumph by Eric604 · · Score: 0

      50% seems a bit high, i heard they drink beer out of their boots!!

    11. Re:Garumph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wash my hands before I use the toilet, not afterwards. Why bother washing them afterwards?

      I use a keyboard to work on. They are filtier than most toilets.

    12. Re:Garumph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bosses' office was halfway to the bathroom, so I'd just stop there and take a dump in one of his desk drawers. LOOK! I cut my travel time in half, my efficieny is way up!

  18. The Cure by MikeMacK · · Score: 5, Funny
    The advice that most experts offer is deceptively simple: Dr. McEwen, for example, recommends getting enough sleep, avoiding cigarettes and alcohol, eating sensibly and exercising.

    How can I do all that, I'm too busy working.

    1. Re:The Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if I give up cigarettes there will be no dealing with the stress. For those of you who haven't been dumb enough to start smoking, don't do it. Just go out and buy a literal monkey for your back, much easier to deal with.

      Once you're hooked, you won't be able to deal with stress without them. If I could go back and time and beat the living crap out of myself right before I took my first inhale, I would do it. And I would be merciless about it. The damage to the space/time continuum be damned.

    2. Re:The Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And once you factor in daily commute time that leaves you with about 20 minutes daily of personal time which you'll use to shower and do some house chores. Life is depressing...

    3. Re:The Cure by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      You shower?

    4. Re:The Cure by _w00d_ · · Score: 1

      How can I do all that, I'm too busy working.

      The parent was modded Funny but this is true for many people, especially people with a spouse and children. After work, people usually don't have time to exercise since they have to go home, make dinner, spend time with the kids, put them to bed, and spend time with the spouse. Short change time with one part of your family and that creates more stress.

      The solution: move to Europe.

    5. Re:The Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I know you are joking. Dr. McEwen makes a good point. I suffer from stress and anxiety to the point where I have been physically sick for the last 4 years (unable to work or goto school). I can't eat anything unhealthy anymore or I throw up. Eating healthy and exercising has been the only thing that has made me better. Eating pizza or junk food will make me feel dealthy sick. I used to smoke and drink aswell, and I'm sure that didn't help at all. Doctors I went to had no clue what was wrong with me, I had to goto a naturopathic doctor and start taking enzymes and all sorts of health pills, but it worked and after 4 years of vomitting I am finally getting better. Stress (and depression) pretty much took 4 years of my life from me, so I know how bad it is for businesses.

      I really hope our government starts to realize how severe mental health illnesses are and provide some funding and support for the many millions who suffer.

    6. Re:The Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After work, people usually don't have time to exercise since they have to go home, make dinner, spend time with the kids, put them to bed, and spend time with the spouse. Short change time with one part of your family and that creates more stress.

      The solution: move to Europe.


      Yep. If you're that far away then the spouse and kids won't be able to bother you.

    7. Re:The Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to suggest Divorce, but moving to Europe is so crazy it just might work!

  19. on the plus side.... by brauwerman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fortunately, stress is proving a boon to the health care industry, motivating $600M in additional revenue!

    1. Re:on the plus side.... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Unfortuneately, all the extra work caused by the increase in claims has caused great stress to healthcare workers.

  20. excuse me, but how is parent a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is that post a troll?

    1. Re:excuse me, but how is parent a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd wager because the connections the parent makes are baseless. You can't say that France's 35 hour work week is the cause of unemployment unless you're pushing an agenda. Nor does people working 70 hour work weeks in the US mean the opposite.

  21. people in the US work too much-Outsourcing stress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We work too much, and are one of the most productive, and still our jobs go overseas.

    No wonder we're stressed.

  22. Eh? by edunbar93 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can a country lose $300 billion in productivity and still be the most productive country in the world? Americans work longer hours, spend less time on vacation, work harder, and as a result your economy outpaces countries like Japan, whom you used to believe were insanely overworked.

    This is another one of those monetary statistics that we can file under "overblown."

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    1. Re:Eh? by Foxyloficus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure about the 'work harder' bit, as far as I'm aware, productivity per hour worked is higher in most European countries. People in the US do work a lot more hours, but less productive hours. BTW much of the US economic growth that you tout is driven my debt, which is funded from the savings of people in Japan, China and Europe. Economies such as Japan and Europe where people tend to save more and consume less tend to grow at slower, steadier rates. At the moment the US government appears to be trying to stave off a massive economic meltdown by having effectively zero interest rates and huge government spending. I hope this works, because if it doesn't, it's going to horrible globally.

    2. Re:Eh? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about growth though, but more about where you are now. More interesting is that this has been going on for a few years now.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    3. Re:Eh? by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

      1. Because we've got vast resources. We're a large nation with relatively few people in it, but with many diverse communities. This allows cheap expansion, effective regional competition, cheap natural resources, etc.

      2. Because we've got good cooperative neighbors to take advantage of. Canada and Mexico also have vast resources that compliment US corporations' ability to gain money on a large scale. From labor, to timber, to mining to many other things, they expand on what gives American businesses a large edge already.

      I doubt that having the local burger joint employee pulling a 40-hour work week as opposed to a 35-hour one is going to count so much as much as the sheer resource considerations. Employee hours and benefits are more an issue of pushing money around than losing it.

      So long as all businesses are kept to the same environmental pressures to keep employees happy or equivalent, the effect after competition will result in most companies ending up the same finantially. Again, compared to base resources available and other supply chain considerations, reasonable employee standards are a very minor issue.

      I'm just a CS guy with business-owning relatives, and I haven't even slept at a Holiday Inn Express or anything. I can understand how some businesses would be affected differently than others - but I believe that so long as the burden of payment standards is somewhat even between companies, lower hours would NOT be a significant drain on most industries. :^)

      Ryan Fenton

    4. Re:Eh? by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      It is PERFECT SENSE!

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    5. Re:Eh? by bit01 · · Score: 1

      How can a country lose $300 billion in productivity and still be the most productive country in the world?

      One of the things that makes America productive is that it is a third world economy (millions of illegals) mixed in with a first world economy. With no border and transport costs in between business can choose first or third world workers as appropriate to maximise their productivity, particularly in California. There aren't that many other countries where this happens on such a large scale.

      ---

      It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
      It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
      Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.

    6. Re:Eh? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you mean to say that it all makes perfect sense, expressed in dollars and cents.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    7. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. China, Russia, Canada
      2. Russia, Georgia, Ukraine

      What's your point?

    8. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the things that makes America productive is that it is a third world economy (millions of illegals) mixed in with a first world economy. With no border and transport costs in between business can choose first or third world workers as appropriate to maximise their productivity

      Actually, China's economy works quite alot like our own in that regard.

    9. Re:Eh? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Well it could have nothing to do with the habits of the average worker.

      Check out the book "Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies" by Jared Diamond.

      Even if you dont agree with everything he says in the book, it basically shows that WHOMEVER it was that ended up on the North American continent was going to have an easy time of it and probably end up the most powerful society in the world.

      It's got nothing to do with the people, and a whole lot to do with the natural resources, size of the landmass, weather, and biology already on North America.

      The fact that the Native Americans weren't the ones invading Europe instead of the other way around was more or less dumb bad luck.

      Check it out, it's a good read.

    10. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most productive country in the world is NOT the USA.. as I understand it the most productive country in the world is Switzerland.

      Here's a URL:

      http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2002/06/produc tive-around-the-world

    11. Re:Eh? by zCyl · · Score: 1

      Your chart shows GNP, not GDP. GNP includes products produced by citizens of a country who are living in other countries. If you instead compare GDP's, then the USA is above Switzerland by about 15%.

  23. "Mental health" day by Therlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At my workplace, it is widely accepted to use a day of sick leave and call it a "mental health" day.

    We all need to step away from the everyday crap and let our brain rest. Sometimes you need it and you usually come back to work energized and ready to finish the rest of the week.

    1. Re:"Mental health" day by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      We all need to step away from the everyday crap and let our brain rest. Sometimes you need it and you usually come back to work energized and ready to finish the rest of the week.

      Yeah, I call that "Monday-through-Thursday." Saturday and Sunday is "Me time."

    2. Re:"Mental health" day by maximilln · · Score: 2, Funny

      At my workplace, it is widely accepted to use a day of sick leave and call it a "mental health" day.

      I've worked for companies like that. Employees who made use of a mental health day more than once in their career were labelled as psychological liabilities and systematically eliminated from the company.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    3. Re:"Mental health" day by Ikester8 · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who would call in sick, saying something was wrong with his eyes. He just didn't see himself coming into work that day!

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
  24. This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Decent companies are forced to drug test their employees for harmless substances like THC.

    I tried my best to work in the u.s., but I couldn't hack it, just couldn't do it. Even the innocuous suggestion that we go down the pub for an ale during lunch raised some eyebrows and instilled fear in my coworkers. Why do the people working in corporate america have this attitude ? Is it just plain fear? Are you all so desperate to climb the corporate ladder that _living_ takes a backseat to it? Then the 60 and 70 hour workweeks, people taking work home with them for at least another dozen hours of unpaid work...

    Absolutely ridiculous... I'm glad to be back in .AU for good this time. My advice to americans... hmmm, get the fuck out of that madhouse now.

    1. Re:This is what happens when by fatman22 · · Score: 1

      We're not desperate to climb the corporate ladder, we're desperately trying to stay on it.

    2. Re:This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Think about this:

      Why do we ask "where do you live" when we mean "where are you when you aren't working"?

      Aren't we "living" at work? I get a small chuckle out of that.. mentally "life" stops when you go to work and continues when you return home.

      Shouldn't you "live" all the time??

    3. Re:This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting? Give me some of whatever you've got, mods -- it must be good.

    4. Re:This is what happens when by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Amen to that.

      Here's how I dealt with it:

      1. Identify something at your company that isn't "sexy." And I'm not talking about the 50 year old receptionist. 3 years ago, right out of college, I took a job with a small software company. They make applications for point-of-sale systems, and about half of the customers are still running old hardware with MS-DOS 6.22 with no plans to upgrade. However, they still wanted new features so there was constant development in this area which no one wanted to do because the Codeview debugger sucks and putting printfs everywhere is tedious.

      2. Get good at it. Ideally, you want to find a better way to do things than just do things. So I invested a bunch of time and effort into learning how DOS works at its lowest levels and memorizing the 286-protected mode extender's manual. Then I cooked up some better debugging tools. One thing I did was created an exception routine that would iterate through the frame pointers on the stack and print the address of each called function to a file when the app crashed in the field. It also saved off various variables indicating when in the transaction the crashed occured as well. I then created a script that would automagically match up these hex values to addresses in the map file and give me a human readable call stack. No more unexplainable, unreproduceable offsite crashes. Totally revolutionized how we do things. I was a hero and suddenly I am THE DOS expert. Mostly I now sit in my cube and read Slashdot, pausing occasionally to help the other developers with their DOS problems. Oh, and I write the occasional module to interface to a new device (RS-232, another unsexy area of expertise).

      3. Live below your means. As I live in the midwest, housing is cheap to begin with. I shopped around until I found a house that needed some work and had a motivated seller. It was $45K (less than I make a year!), has three bedrooms plus a large finished attic, and is located in a reasonably decent, working class neighborhood. A little paint, a new roof on the garage, and some carpet and its good to go. I've almost got it paid off.

      4. Don't get married for a while. For me, this was easy because most of the women I dated up until now have been psychos. Ideally, you want to find a mate that's not horribly materialistic. See that girl with the nice hair and make-up and the designer clothes? Ignore her. She's hugely materialistic and probably a total flake to boot. Instead look for someone that at first glance you wouldn't ordinarily glance at. She's the one wearing the T-shirt and blue jeans and hastily combed hair that likes to stay up all night watching Monty Python. (They do exist, I'm dating her right now. I love you honeybunny.) She may not be as attractive initially but, I've noticed that, if I date an attractive woman with no personality, she quickly becomes less attractive. On the other hand, a relatively unattractive woman with a great personality will become more attractive as you get to know her. (Subjectively attractive that is, they don't let themselves go or anything.)

      5. After establishing yourself as the resident expert in something, be sure your boss knows you are living well beneath your means. But don't tell him outright. You don't want to come off as cocky. Instead, drive a shitty car to work as your primary vehicle or casually discuss how you spent the weekend re-roofing the garage. He'll get the idea. Once your house is paid off and you got it fixed up (and it will be soon within a few short years if you do most things yourself and don't spend a ton of money on a new car or other luxuries), you'll be able to quit any time you want and go to work at the local Dairy Mart and your boss will know it. Suddenly, he's kissing YOUR ass. You won't be asked to work 80 hours a week anymore. You might even get to telecommute.

      Oh, and as for the THC thing, shave your head and keep a sample of clean urine handy.

      So to recap,

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    5. Re:This is what happens when by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Mod up!

      ITs very sad but CEO's make 100x as much here in the states than your country in Australia or the UK.

      Reason being is its unregulated and the sky is the limit. They install this attitude of maximization and if any employee does not maximize throughput they are a cost center.

      This forces American companies to be far more productive at a cost of course.

    6. Re:This is what happens when by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Reason being is its unregulated and the sky is the limit

      I agree wholly with your sentiment but have a little problem with the perspective here. You're implying that the solution is more regulation.

      It's not. Here's why.

      More regulation means more money going from you to Washington. More money in Washington means the people closest to Washington (socially, though sometimes geographically) are closest to your money. The people who are socially closest to Washington are always going to be the people on Wall Street.

      ITs very sad but CEO's make 100x as much here in the states than your country in Australia or the UK

      Indeed. They make that much because they're the closest people to your money. They're the closest to your money because they're closer to Wall Street than you are. Wall Street is closer to your money because they're closer to Washington.

      They way to remove this inequity is to REMOVE the millions of unnecessary and redundant regulations which do nothing more than funnel more of your money to Washington (and Wall Street, and CxOs)

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    7. Re:This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I'm certainly not an expert on women; I don't claim to understand any part of how their minds work, but I halfway suspect that you may have said The Wrong Thing somewhere in your post:

      a relatively unattractive woman with a great personality will become more attractive as you get to know her
      and
      She may not be as attractive
      are the two pieces that caused my TWT meter to register, but we'd have to bring in an expert to see why.
    8. Re:This is what happens when by JakiChan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your plan is somewhat lacking...what about those of us who live in an area that isn't cheap? Sorry, but living "below my means" in the Bay Area means moving to the Central Valley. And commuting 2 hours each way to work. And guess what...more stress.

      Sorry, but I happen to like my toys. I took Friday off for this Labor Day weekend to give me 4 days of no work. What did I do Friday? I went stomping around the Santa Cruz mountains in my new car. And then I came home and watched a movie on my big-ass TV. It was a good day.

      Now the biggest flaw in your plan is that there is a reason you are doing work that no one wants to do. Because it sucks. What's even better is decide what you like to do and then do it. Doing what you love often leads to rewarding work.

      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    9. Re:This is what happens when by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      US corps are regulated?

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    10. Re:This is what happens when by tyrantnine · · Score: 1

      The one major flaw with becoming the expert on the things no one else knows (or is interested in) is that these are often skills that are very hard to transfer to another job. If your company survives, and you survive the company, great. In today's corporate world however, this seems to be a very poor bet to make. However if not, good luck prominently listing "DOS expert" on your resume, much less finding the small niche of companies that would actually find this to be a positive.

      The rest of your advice is mix of common sense "duhs" mixed with nonsense. A role model indeed - someone who's hair disappears when drug tests roll around (I presume you also bathe in nair), works (lazily) on outdated tech (and likely has a distored view about their own job security and position), offers "date a geekier girl" as a shining nugget of relationship wisdom, and keeps a few bottles of clean urine in the fridge... hmmm! I'm glad you seem to have found what works for you, and though I'm no workaholic materialist freak, I'd suggest there are better "guides to happiness" around.

    11. Re:This is what happens when by dogfart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why do the people working in corporate america have this attitude ? Is it just plain fear?

      Short answer: Yes

      Longer answer: Employee are expendable in the USA. You may be let go for not being a "team player" and working the extra hours your peers work. This creates a competitive atmsphere where no one wants to be seen as the slacker. Once you have been let go, you lose your benefits (yes you can continue your health benefits at a very high cost under a program called COBRA, but that is short term and ver expensive). Unemployment benefits are very small compared to any salaried position - you must have a very frugal lifestyle to live on unemployment (also some employers are very skilled at "terminating" employees in such a way that they are unable to collect unemployment at all). Finally, folks who have been terminated are treated like pariahs by many potential employers. I know this from being on the hiring end - "If this person were any good, why were they let go?"

      When you have been through this, you have the requisite level of fear necessary to ensure you will not get let go again. You colleagues who acted frightened about your lunch suggestion may have been through this.

      Really, the American economic system is all about fear and greed.

      --

      "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

    12. Re:This is what happens when by Profound · · Score: 1

      I used to live and work in North America too. Maybe it was just the company I worked for, but the corporate climate was noticably different from back home.

      We were told on day 1 that this company was a wonderful meritocracy where your spot on the ladder was based solely on talent. Of course this was bullshit, but those who were in higher positions believed it as it was flattering to them and justified their position.

      With this mindset it wasn't much of a stretch to see those who were below you as deserving their inferior status, and to treat them with contempt. It is different here, sure there are some jerks like anywhere, but we also believe that if someone has a shitty job or is out of cash they might have had a run of bad luck and so they don't deserve our contempt. I have never had a boss in Australia that woudn't eat or have a beer with their workers.

      I couldn't afford an apartment near the beach in North America either, which is one of the reasons I am glad I am back in Oz.

    13. Re:This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd suggest there are better "guides to happiness" around.

      Maybe you should try reading one. The guy you're replying to sounds a lot happier than you...

    14. Re:This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I happen to like my toys. I took Friday off for this Labor Day weekend to give me 4 days of no work. What did I do Friday? I went stomping around the Santa Cruz mountains in my new car. And then I came home and watched a movie on my big-ass TV. It was a good day.

      No offense intended, but how old are you? I might have made a statement like that in my twenties, but after putting up with another decade of working for toys, I now have a different view.

      For the past few years, I've lived below my means and saved. I don't really miss new cars or giant TVs. My house will be paid off next year, and I'll be able to take a low stress job with much more free time soon.

    15. Re:This is what happens when by tyrantnine · · Score: 1

      I'm doing pretty well actually!

    16. Re:This is what happens when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm getting better!

      I Feel Happy!

      *whump* Right, see you next friday...

  25. It's all about balance. by Soko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Buddists have one thing right - there is a Yin and a Yang to everything. Call it a dual edged sword, whetever - in our world, there is an upside and a downside to everything.

    There will enevitably be many +5 (Insightful) comments about how we're being mowed down by "the Man, squeezing more blood out of us to make more money", but when you think about it, the reason for that is we all, in reality, want to be "the Man". We want the things they dangle in front of us, that require disposable income to acquire. "Ooooh, Shiny iPod/Beemer/Opteron" crosses our lips and we've bought into this system. Work more to get more things for our "leisure time", which ends up being non-existant. "If work hard, I'll get promoted and get that raise - then I'll get a life" used to be my mantra. Now, after my good paying job was killed and in essence just moved out of province in the name of profits, I'm fed up enough to say "Fuck you - as long as my family is warm, healthy, clothed and fed I'm happy".

    Capitalism is good, it's the best system we've got, but like all things it can go too far. Don't forget why your toiling away - it's to make a life, not make money. Remember, there is a downside to everything - no exceptions.

    Meh. Just Crown Royal influenced ramblings from a slightly bitter old man. On to our regularily scheduled bashing of "the man"...

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:It's all about balance. by benna · · Score: 1

      The Yin and Yang is actually a Taoist concept but the principle still exists in buddhism. I think you are on to something though. The buddhists advocate elimination of desire as the key to happiness. Thats essencially the problem in this country, too much desire leading to stress.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:It's all about balance. by sbillard · · Score: 1

      Oh my. I just posted an original thread subject: "Greed"
      In that post I ranted about CxO culture and pointlessness of trying.
      Thank you! Thank you for helping me make sense of my gut feeling and somehow understand that I'm trying to... to make a life, not make money .

    3. Re:It's all about balance. by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 1

      Well, I think Yin and Yang is essentially Taoist, but you're right about us Buddhists finding a happy medium.

      The example from Buddhist canon that springs to mind is the Lute Simile, where our choice of lifestyle is likened to the strings of an instrument. Too much tension, and they snap. Too slack, and their noise is unpleasant. But just the right balance, and you have beautiful music.

      Likewise, it's important to be energetic and dedicated in our pursuits, but not to the point where we work ourselves to death. Especially not when all we're working for is pricey toys and baubles. Me, I'm working to make a happy, uncomplicated life for myself and my girlfriend. That's it. No kids, no bling. Actually, I was thinking of becoming a monk, but I'm a sucker for a quick-witted redhead.

    4. Re:It's all about balance. by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But the best balance is about picking and choosing the best of all possible scenarios, not about dogmatic loyalties to particular arbitrary reference frames.

      Capitalism works if there are resources to waste, that is if we can afford to have 20 different firms making a product, knowing that 80% of them will not exist in year, and half the inventory will be surplus.

      In any system there are the vested interests that will oppress to maintain power or profits or whatever. And there are as many people in a America who do nothing but draw a paycheck as anywhere else.

      Furthermore, capitalism depends upon us buying stuff. Therefore, we not only work to get money to buy stuff, we buy stuff so we can work. To me this leads to a flaw of capitalism, in that it requires a somewhat balanced distribution of wealth to function. If a few people have all the money, capitalism will not function as there is only so much stuff that one person can buy. To make sure that people really consume, you have to have a viable middle class, and even a viable lower class, for they are the ones that are going to be the largest consumers of basic goods. The yachts do not drive the economy, the food and clothes and rent does. To do this, as the natural tendency to collect wealth, a significant amount of socialism has to be introduced so that people will have enough confidence that new money will be coming in next week or next month and will therefore spend money instead of saving an undue amount. People who are worried about survival are not going to buy the goods that actually keep a firm afloat.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:It's all about balance. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I was thinking of becoming a monk, but I'm a sucker for a quick-witted redhead.

      Attachment is the root of all sufferring and, ultimately, death. See the skull beneath the ruby tresses and you will be liberated.

      --
      That is all.
    6. Re:It's all about balance. by maximilln · · Score: 1

      A Libertarian who doesn't vote Libertarian isn't really a Libertarian.

      A real libertarian knows that the voting system is rigged.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    7. Re:It's all about balance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Buddists have one thing right - there is a Yin and a Yang to everything. Call it a dual edged sword, whetever - in our world, there is an upside and a downside to everything.

      You are confusing Buddhism with Taoism. Buddhism does not have the concepts of Yin and Yang, except in unusual cases where it was imported from Taoism. They are both from Asia though.

  26. Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by Cryofan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    France and most other European countries will give you far more unemployment benefits than American workers gets. In many EU countries, one could drawa years of unemployment if laid off. Try that here.

    Plus, welfare is far more generous there.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      "years of unemployment"

      How about 'go get a job'. Any job.

      Why should I, as a productive citizen, subsidise someone who chooses to slack off for a year or more? Why do *I* have to work my ass of to support him? Why can't he pull his own weight? I do.

      Plus, welfare is far more generous there.

      Welfare is the biggest pyramid scheme going. Sure, some people need assistance for a while. No problem with that. But unproductive people, some by choice, are merely a drag on society.

      How about this...

      How about I invest some of my money (instead of it being taken at gunpoint). Or I buy some stuff. Thereby making that company stronger. Maybe they'll have to hire some more people to keep up with the increased demand. How about they hire that guy, who is otherwise sitting on his ass, waiting for me to give him a handout.

    2. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by AtariEric · · Score: 1

      How about I invest some of my money (instead of it being taken at gunpoint). Or I buy some stuff. Thereby making that company stronger. Maybe they'll have to hire some more people to keep up with the increased demand.

      That is a very big maybe, which history has shown not to be the result of a moderate rise in investment/spending. Most companies would rather flog more labor out of existing workers and keep that extra money, boosting that all holy stock price.

      I agree, however, that abuse of the welfare system is wrong, and such systems should supply just enough funds to survive and maybe supply education fee waivers and college book vouchers so those who need it can become even more productive.

      --
      Don't trust any concentration of power.
    3. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by maximilln · · Score: 1

      I agree, however, that abuse of the welfare system is wrong

      True.

      and such systems should supply just enough funds to survive and maybe supply education fee waivers and college book vouchers so those who need it can become even more productive.

      That's what the economy is predominantly. Most people have just enough funds to survive, their taxes pay for education, many states have vouchers, et cetera et cetera et cetera.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    4. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Want a few drags on the economy? The mexicans who come up here to pop a kid out and live off of welfare and the native americans who would rather drink all day. I have met some from both group, many from the latter than the former due to location, that are just as furious to have a lazy majority make them look bad. Welfare should be severly limited or axed altogether for those that just simply don't deserve it.

    5. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Problem is if there is no unemployment insurance
      and you'd starve to death without a job you pretty soon find yourself working for next to nothing.

    6. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't he pull his own weight? I do.

      And being an American, I dare say that's a LOT of weight.

    7. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make up your mind, americans want less taxes, less taxes mean less benefits for the unemployed, do you really know how much taxes you pay in France?.

      Want your benefits back, dont vote with taxes in mind.

      Happy next 4 years.

    8. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      "France and most other European countries will give you far more unemployment benefits than American workers gets. In many EU countries, one could drawa years of unemployment if laid off."

      And their economies are going down the drain, in no small part because of that. Oh wait...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Unemlpoyment is OK when you have good benefits by goatan · · Score: 1

      There economies are like America experiencing a jobless recovery there GDP etc are rising but the number of jobs isn't. I'm from the UK by the way we have plenty of jobs but not enough houses.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  27. From this information we can assume. by JVert · · Score: 1

    Lazyness costs 900 billion, and can be a leading cause of stress for many "workers".

  28. Airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit choking idiots to death.

  29. Good and/or bad by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mod me down if you want. I'll use my karma bonus this time to fend off your savage attacks. Ha ha! Take that.

    Anyways...

    What I find interesting is that if this were about another country, such as Germany, people would be speaking highly of the German people's work ethic, their productivity and their strength. When it's about America though, it's because we're greedy and don't know how to enjoy life (regardless of the fact that for some, work is enjoyable).

    Now what if this article stated that the U.S. had the least stressful workers with the most leisure time? There would be endless comments citing this as evidence of American laziness and preoccupation with entertainment. No matter what, it is possible to interpret the data however one desires, to fit any man's personal slant.

    1. Re:Good and/or bad by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. America is the most stressful place in the world to work. We're way out on one end of the bell curve, and we know it, and we know that isn't a good place to be. That's why we're bitching about it here.

      Now, let's take the next country along the bell curve. Japan, IIRC. We think they work too hard, too. That blows your theory out of the water.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  30. Please do the math for odds of becoming "The Man" by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Wealth is by defintion RELATIVE. The odds of becoming "The Man" are BY DEFINTION quite slim. For every McMansion in the suburbs of Big Metro, there are 10 middle aged Quickie Mart clerks hiding away in flyover country, where they escaped after the Big City busted them.

    And that McMansion is usually mortgaged to the hilt....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  31. Things are looking up for me-Performance anxiety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Looks like a great time to be a stress-balls manufacturer."

    Trust me. They're already stressed enough.

  32. Temporary effect of capitalism? by Pingla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems quite evident that stress is a result of stronger pressure regarding performance, and this is again a result of tougher competition between companies. So naturally the employers try to squeeze out as much as possible out of their employees as they see it most beneficial. But what I cannot grasp is why they continue to do se even when it has been demonstrated again and again that having overworked and stressed employees doesn't improve efficiency! It may look like it in the short run, but at a point it turns, drastically.

    If a company needs more work done, why not hire more qualified people and keep the working hours down? Overtime is compensated quite heavily and by hiring an extra person instead of all the compensation the company will not spend more money on the work force, more people will be working, and there would be less stress. Can it be this simple, or is there something that I am completely missing? If this had been the most efficient solution one would think it had been adopted as a standard in the constant fight in our capitalistic environment.

    1. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by benna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd say its more of a permanent effect of capitalism. Capitalism is all about people constnatly trying to do more and more, and make more and more money, and get higher and higher positions, and get better and better grades and a million other things. No wonder people are stressed. If people would just sit back and realize that they are ok right where they are they would be alot less stressed. Life is like a dance or a song. You wouldn't dance to get to a spot on the floor or play to get to the end of the song.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      "Overtime is compensated quite heavily. . ."

      Obviously you haven't seen the new overtime regulations. Extra work just got awfully cheap for companies.

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    3. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by maximilln · · Score: 1

      Capitalism is all about people constnatly trying to do more and more, and make more and more money, and get higher and higher positions, and get better and better grades and a million other things

      Capitalism is an economic system, not a system of philosophical priorities.

      Why does everyone try to ride on the coattails of the "capitalism" word? It's not a security blanket.

      If people would just sit back and realize that they are ok right where they are they would be alot less stressed.

      We could do this in a capitalist system if our government wasn't trying to pass us the debt that was incurred by the thieving schemes of a few (1929, 1980-Black Monday, .com boom-bust).

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    4. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by boomgopher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If people would just sit back and realize that they are ok right where they are they would be alot less stressed. Life is like a dance or a song. You wouldn't dance to get to a spot on the floor or play to get to the end of the song.

      You don't have a family and kids do you?

      Working hard to buy a home so your family can have stability: good
      Working hard to live in a good neighborhood so your family doesn't live next to drunk homeless guys: good
      Working hard so your wife doesn't have to work (and keeping kids out of daycare): good
      etc...

      That's not capitalism, that's common sense and being responsible.
      And sorry, I don't trust the government enough to let them try and provide those things for me via social programs.

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    5. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Capitalism itself is not a permanent state. The only thing not going down in price, at least as compared to personal income, is land. Everything else is getting cheaper. Eventually we'll be packed in like sardines but our cost of living will be virtually nonexistent. It will take an artificially long time because of the general interest by some people in having vastly more money than almost everyone else but it can't last forever unless technology stops advancing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by Pingla · · Score: 1

      "Obviously you haven't seen the new overtime regulations."

      There is no such thing as 'global regulations' disregarding human rights etc. My experience is from Scandinavia and Japan, and overtime is usually compensated with +50% for the first few hours and then +100%, something I consider quite heavy. I assume you are referring to the US, and no, I am not aware of the 'new overtime regulations', unfortunately.

    7. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by Pingla · · Score: 1

      My point is that if working overtime causes stress and this becomes very costly to the company and the society then at some point it is no longer the most efficient use of resources.
      When that point is reached changes should be made by reducing working hours etc. That is why I consider it temporary. However, if this point is not reached, yes, then it is permanent.

      You are describing this through the eyes of the employee who is ambitious and wants to rise as fast and high as possible, while I am trying to see this from the viewpoint of the management who is in control and in position to decide the company policies.

    8. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      If workers have the "Don't Complain, Work Hard" work ethic, how is the employer supposed to know that there is a problem and its not only damaging the workers health, but also reducing efficiency? I know far too many people with this attitude.

    9. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I'd say its more of a permanent effect of capitalism. Capitalism is all about people constnatly trying to do more and more, and make more and more money, and get higher and higher positions, and get better and better grades and a million other things.

      Yes. But in order for it to work, we have to also accept that a vast majority of those that strive will fail. We are really big on exhalting the achievers. We pull the rug out from under any percieved failures. There is nothing to fall back on if you aren't independently wealthy.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    10. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Beyond affirmation and negation, it's a cliche!

      Do I win a prize?

    11. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by benna · · Score: 1

      heh nope, its a koan...if you answer it with words you are wrong.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    12. Re:Temporary effect of capitalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , 9/11).

  33. Re:399 driik by captnitro · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mod parent insightful! This man is clearly taking a well-deserved break, and we should thank him for demonstrating by example. Now somebody, open the scotch, then I plan to drive home on the sidewalk.

  34. I was going to answer you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I'm so stressed now to think about something good!

  35. But Germans work less than Americans by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    They have more time off and work hundreds of hours less per year. That is a fact not open to debate.

    And that did not happen by accident. The German people and their government arranged it that way.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:But Germans work less than Americans by foote · · Score: 1

      Mnemonic is suggesting that if Germans worked the same number of hours a year as Americans do, and with as little vacation, they would be praised for their industry, not condemned for having such a stressful, out-of-balance culture.

      Mnemonic has made no statement about how much Germans work. He is suggesting that many people tend to condemn America reflexively and, as tentative evidence for this phenomenon, he predicts that the same work requirements in a different country would result in praise for that country, not condemnation.

  36. Might I suggest a cure ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... cool, refreshing marijuana?

    1. Re:Might I suggest a cure ... by benna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is actually an interesting point. The benefits of a society of pot heads may actually outweigh the costs. With stress costing that much theres a pretty good chance of it anyway.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Might I suggest a cure ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smoke some pot (or ingest, to prevent nasty cancer), be high for a few hours but feel good for a week. It's the way to go.

      It's nice to see that people are realising the damage over-work causes. Now if only something could be done about over-consumption... (Realising that you don't need 2 SUVs and a small mansion)

    3. Re:Might I suggest a cure ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... cool, refreshing marijuana?

      Menthol?

  37. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The redhead? I'd definately hit that, and I'm gay.

  38. 300bn a Year by Ed+Thomson · · Score: 1

    By simple addition of varoius studies scientists have caluclated that stress, sickness, smog, hippies and traffic congestion cost approx $5,000,000 per American per year.

  39. YAFWAKBCQ by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    Yet another fact we always knew but couldn't quantify. When are "they" gonna start listening to us plebes?

  40. 50% of all tax returns are less than $35K by Cryofan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fact. Google it. In 2002 (or was it 2003?), about 30% of all tax return had a gross income of less than $20K. And about 50% of all tax returns had a gross income of less than $35K. That is counting BOTH single and joint filers. Those people are working the longer hours with little vacation just like the rest of America, but it is a little hard to get all those SUVs on that pay. Let's fact it: we Americans do not make as much money as we like to pretend we do.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:50% of all tax returns are less than $35K by tjb · · Score: 1, Informative

      And...?

      Where I grew up, I could live quite well on $35K. Maybe not as well as I do now, but I wouldn't exactly be starving either.

      What do you think people make in Europe? As far as engineers go, I work with 30+ Europeans and almost every single one of them came to the US because engineers make roughly 2-3x what they do in Europe. In the US (on either coast - in the middle its less), a MSEE is easily $90K/yr. In France (even in Paris), $35-40K Euro if you're lucky enough to find a job.

      Quite frankly, I'll take 4 weeks of vacation at twice the pay rate over 9 weeks of vacation and the government taxing the shit out of me to give it to a bunch of lazy slobs who can't be bothered to find a job.

      Tim

    2. Re:50% of all tax returns are less than $35K by Saeculorum · · Score: 1

      I'd certainly hope your statistic is true.

      No, really. Do you really expect 16-year-olds working for 2.5 months in the summer to make more than $20k?

    3. Re:50% of all tax returns are less than $35K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It depends what values you have. Freedom or money.
      I prefer freedom, why spend all your life working and buying a lot of stuff you don't need?

      I rather spend 2 months on my bicycle during the summer than earning enough money for even more crap.

  41. Re:more stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to find a working proxy is pretty stressful, I must agree. I just troll from school or work.

  42. Re:399 driik by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Alright man, time to get out of the slashdot gutter.

    Alcoholics Anonymous

    See, that's at least two times you've done this now. Yesterday sometime

    Of course, there is the chance that you are joking. I doubt anyone could type that bad and still be close enough for me to rad it intentionally.

    And yes, this is way offtopic. I better post something related, insightfully if possible

    See, this is the kind of thing that is a result of stress. 300 Billion a year is hard to imagine. This guy posting drunk to slashdot, cause he (maybe) drinks away the stress on weekends, that's something we can relate to. All that money is just speculation, but see what a little stress and a lot of alcohol will do to you? This is what's runing america.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  43. "Encouraged" by fear of losing their jobs by Cryofan · · Score: 1, Troll

    Let's face it: the Europeans have their governments and media working on their side, while we Americans have our government and media working on the side of the investors and the corporations. Just like it was back in the days of slavery.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:"Encouraged" by fear of losing their jobs by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      What I meant by "encouraged" is that many people are driven to work overtime because they want to buy things they couldn't afford otherwise. Sometimes they'll work overtime to buy a new TV, sometimes to buy a car or a house. None of those things are really needs, since you can live with a cheap used car and an apartment, and you don't need a TV at all. Hence my use of the word.

      Now as for the scare-quotes, there's no denying that businesses conflate the sorts of things I listed above with a better lifestyle. (And in many cases they're fair to do so. It's way nicer to have a new car than a beat-up old used one.) So while people make their own choices to work, or not work, overtime, they aren't entirely free from influence, and so it's misleading to imply that it's an entirely individual decision.

      As for the rest of your "argument" (the scare-quotes are there this time because I'm being extremely generous and want you to know it), well, I've already made my quota for flamebait this week.

  44. Ethnocentrism by shubert1966 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " US are very too dumb, they will elect Bush and they stress, it's very funny!"

    " US are very too dumb . . ."
    This part of your sentence does not translate well. The flaw in your grammar could, with a little allusion, be extended so that YOU (plural) are ignorant also.

    " . . .they will elect Bush and they stress , , ,"
    The 'each and several states' send delegates to the appropriate state capitols in the second week of December. These electors will cast their votes for President and Vice President. http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm
    Individual citizens will vote of course, but the popular vote in a presidential election is only a barometer for the electors to gauge the political atmosphere. Additionally, many/most of us will not vote for Bush.

    " . . .it's very funny!" The word you're looking for is "ironic", perhaps "sardonic". George W. Bush being president has been anything but funny.

    Maybe you'd like us to vote for isolationist Pat Buchanan?
    See: https://www.cato.org/dailys/12-22-99a.html

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  45. Stress-relief tip #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Stop measuring everything in terms of money!

    In fact, measure things as rarely as you can get away with, whether it's your income, the number of friends you have, the size of your steak or the speed of your CPU.

  46. The Perfect Solution! by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 5, Funny

    Outsource our stress to India! They'd be glad to stress out at 1/3 the cost.

    - Primary numbers are out to kill me

    --
    -- Mace only makes me hornier.
  47. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stress might cost $300 billion, but a blowjob costs $10. Get a blowjob, chill out, and shut off CNN.

  48. Greed by sbillard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Out of touch executives are running the country (US) into the ground from within. They percieve a need to squeeze every penny into their quarterly EPS reports. CxOs will stop at nothing to look good on paper. Their shortsighted strategies combined with an out-of-touch lifestyle make life a living hell for a vast majority of their collective underlings. Their only concerns in life are:
    1. Where do I park my boat? What? No valet service?!?
    2. ???
    3. PROFIT!!!!!

    If executives were more entrenched and had more at stake there would be more coherent operations at work. CxOs need to have their livelyhood at stake in the same way the rest of us do in order to make the right decision. Nothing trickles down to the underlings. You might survive in this corporate culture by sucking up. 1 minute of "face time" has become much more important than fixing a problem or making an improvement. God help us all.

    1. Re:Greed by dhalgren99 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Out of touch executives are running the country (US)

      You mispelt Ruining...

    2. Re:Greed by FFFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't help that executive pay is so insanely high, either. What is it this year, 600x average salary? WTF?!

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think makes the major campaign contributions to our congress critters and such? It might have deliberate :).

    4. Re:Greed by torokun · · Score: 1

      This is a great opportunity for companies that actually value their workers.

      Caterpillar is one such company, and they're making bank. Their workers love the company, and their lives.

  49. 50% of all tax returns are less than $35K-Politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Let's fact it: we Americans do not make as much money as we like to pretend we do."

    True, but it makes for good politics (Slashdot and otherwise). As witnessed by his four to your two.

    Now throw in the large debt load most have and put two and two together, and let the fun begin.

  50. GREAT POST! by Cryofan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Man, you just said what I have trying to tell people for the last year: America is FUCKED!

    I mean it, man. I was born here, and served in the military for America. But when I started comparing it to other countries (which I could finally do only with the Internet), I discovered that something is wrong with this country. And it is not something new. It is something that goes back decades. Or maybe even centuries.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  51. $150 for xanax online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats alot of folks ordering that stuff (i get the spam every day) if you divide it up.

    yummy ;)

  52. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof that mods are gay?

    Not sure.

  53. Well of course. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    This is something that the rest of the world has known for a long time, hence the tredition in Europe of going on a hollyday (of a few weeks) every year.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  54. The "Perfect" solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cue the Libertarian/Republican Dog-Eat-Dog/Survival-Of-The-Fittest Trolls, claiming "the ones that are costing the $300 Billion a year is the poor, so the perfect solution is to eliminate the poor by letting them die off by taking their jobs away from them, after all it's natural selection, capitalism at it's finest. Besides the poor is worthless"

    1. Re:The "Perfect" solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Libertarian != Republican. Just because you disagree with someone's opinions does not make them a "troll". Grow up.

      That essay has nothing to do with eliminating the poor or any of the other things you talked about.

      Please, bring something other than knee-jerk loathing into the argument.

    2. Re:The "Perfect" solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to economic issues, fuck yes the shititarians and the refuckicans are the same. They both believe in Dog-Eat-God Damned Dog/Survival-Of-The-God-Damned-Fucking-Fittest. If you would have read the fucking link, you would have seen that the shititarians blaame the poor for problems in society. To them "The poor=Worthless". And since the sititarians blame the ills of this nation on the poor, I wouldn't put it past a LIb/Repub troll to blame the $300 Billion costs on the poor. That would explain why The shititarian/Refuckicans don't want the poor to have health care nor a Job. Let the stress kill them off

      Also, it's not just thius fucking article, it every article that the shititarians/refuckicans open their big mouth about "No one is entitled to the job".

      Talk about knee jerk reactions, obviously you didn't read the fucking post, or are you too much of a fucktard to do so.

  55. So Slack! by DaHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Want to avoid stress while on the job?

    Just don't care!

    Yea... that deadline is coming quick, but who cares? Which is more important? Some product getting out the door or your sanity and full head of hair?

    1. Re:So Slack! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about my paycheck.

      If you dont do the dealines then your employer owes it to its shareholders to find someone else who will.

      With Indians doing that for 7-14k a year what choice do you have? Suck it up?

    2. Re:So Slack! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      You realize I was joking don't you?

      In fact at work, I have a problem... I'm a horrible slacker; I don't do it very often, and when I try I tend to fail.

      Years ago when I worked at McDonalds I had a work ethic beaten into me with such phrases as "if you've got time to lean you've got time to clean" and "if you've got time to talk you've got time to stock." A mentality to keep working when on the clock with as little unproductive time as possible.

      I'd been an intern at the place for nearly a year before being brought on full time with a salary... and still now that damn ethic is with me.

      One of my co-workers this week spoke of 'those days when you come into work and start looking at a few web pages and before you know it it's lunch time and you haven't done any work yet"... I can't say that I know that sort.

      Stupid personal ethics!

    3. Re:So Slack! by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      And how about that paycheck - third or even half of it - goes to shrank, or even worse, in the middle of your productive life you become a mess and you have to quit?

      Overworking and stress WILL be death of modern society, period. Rushing for the money become so absurd that it has lost any kind of rationality.

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    4. Re:So Slack! by wizrd_nml · · Score: 2, Funny
      Which is more important? Some product getting out the door or your sanity and full head of hair?

      I tried not caring... I still lost my hair :(

    5. Re:So Slack! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It sounds like someone needs to change careers. Not you but the webpage designers under you or your co-workers.

      They are slacking off or are incompetant. In this day and age with laid off designers there are tons and tons of highly tallented inviduals who could take their place. They need to go.

      If they dont have the tools then its different since a good artisitic webpage requires a ton of work but there are templates and tools to design one very quickly.

    6. Re:So Slack! by forkboy · · Score: 1

      In many large corporate jobs, you can do absolutely zero work and as long as you show up, it will be at least a month before anyone notices. Then, when heat starts to come down, send out a bunch of fake progress reports on your work. It helps if your job is as pointless as mine was when I was at Global Crossing. (evaluation of new network security software and hardware when we already had a solid security infrastructure in place)

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    7. Re:So Slack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is precisely what is now happening in corporate america. the people that this selective process have produced are people who can completely slack off yet while making it appear that they are very very busy.

      this has fueled the growth of disastrous corporate politics and is consequently why women are now so "successful" in business...because anyone who has ever lived with a woman for more than a year knows how skilled they are at turning things around when the heat comes down. A true trait of the corporate survivor!

      The irony is that it is the shareholders and executives that are losing money over this; one would think that this would have been corrected long ago by altering the business atmosphere to be more relaxed, yet productive. It is simply a cultural thing that has not yet died.

    8. Re:So Slack! by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I've found that since I quit caring enough to let stress affect me I get the work done better. The worst they can do to me is fire me. Big deal I can get a job anywhere. (not making as much money but I can live on less) Now that I'm not stressed out about how am I going to get everything done by a deadline I prioritize.

      Last project my boss told me I will have X, Y, and Z done, no excuses. I knew enough to say Z is a lower priority, so I did X and Y first (they depended on each other to a large extent), and only after they were done did I look at Z. My boss doesn't make all the decisions, he was told X, Y, and Z, but there is always flexability. If I hadn't been done by the deadline he can go to his boss and say "We have a choice, ship with X and Y but not Z or wait a week and get all three", which gives management a choice they know how to make. When I gave into stress I would have tried to do them all at once, not been able to get any done and been late. Now that I ignore stress and just do my best I get X and Y done before I do Z. I finish faster because my attention isn't divided.

    9. Re:So Slack! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      I agree, in fact such a conversation came up with a co-worker this week... the same one referred to in my above post. Despite the size of the company we work for... he thinks that with a little work (ie not being assigned to any massive projects utilizing the entire department) someone could go for at least a year with out ever doing any real work.

    10. Re:So Slack! by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Yep, that sounds about right. Do a little scrambling once every 2-3 weeks to make it look live you've done something productive. It helps if you're allowed to state your own deadlines. For instance, if a project will reasonably take you a week, tell your boss it will take you a month. Then cut corners and do it in 3-4 days. you've now earned 3 1/2 weeks of vacation.

      Living 5 minutes from work also let me master the fine art of pager-tag. I'd stay in bed until I got a page from someone...my boss, for instance. Then I'd roll out of bed, get dressed quick, and drive to work. I'd call him back and tell him I was in the shitter. Some days I got to sleep until after noon. Man that job was great.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  56. Nice to see a verification. by geekwench · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Interesting article, but it's not anything that I hadn't already figured out - a long time ago.

    Once upon a time, I worked for the Company Formerly Known as USWorst. That experience left me with more knowledge of both their database and their employee benefits program than I ever wanted to know. The stress of that position also left me with carpal tunnel syndrome, the beginnings of a whopping good ulcer, and stress-related dissociative attacks. (Literally, my brain was going on mini-vacations, and neglecting to take me along with it.)
    Now, I own my own business. The pay isn't as regular, but my schedule is my own, and the unreasonable request list is pretty minimal. The carpal tunnel still flares up form time to time, but it's in remission without surgery. (Since I use my hands a lot, this is a critical point.) The other problems started to heal as soon as I escaped the toxic work environment. I'm not spending as much time sitting in a doctor's office, and nowhere near as much money on things like Pepto and pain relief nostrums.

    So, yeah; not exactly news, but it's nice to see that somebody has quantified the impact that work-related stress has on people's lives.

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
    1. Re:Nice to see a verification. by benow · · Score: 1

      Datahands took care of my carpal tunnel, tho I've yet to find an employer that would ever invest in one for their employees. Put 'em on the end of the arms of a good chair and there is no better.

  57. Can I have 10 percent of that? by Trikenstein · · Score: 1

    Not really sure what I'd do with it, but pretty sure it'd be stress free.

  58. Death is Nature's Way of Telling You to Slow Down by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You are not indestructible. I've seen too many friends and coworkers die well before their time. I have chronic health problems that were caused or aggravated by high levels of stress.

    You only have one life. Do you want to spend it working overtime, putting cover sheets on TPS reports and dealing with control freaks in management? Working excessive hours will not make your penis/boobs larger or make you a better person.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  59. Take the example from the japanse by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Let's all do Karoshi !
    Just think of the long-term benefits if we all just follow the trend and work ourselves to death.
    Fewer people on the highways
    Fewer elders collecting retirement
    No need to raise taxes on the beleagured wealthy to prop up social security

    Cheers!

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:Take the example from the japanse by longbot · · Score: 0

      I the last year, I've worked an 80-hour week and an 18 hour day. I think I'm well on the way to Karoshi by now.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
  60. PARENT IS A TROLL by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Informative
    Parent IS a troll.

    for one thing: I'll take the 35 hour work week.

    Also, they did NOT have negative GDP in 2003. It's close to zero, but it's not negative. Don't believe me? ask the spooks:

    http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ fr.html

    thirdly, their unemployment rate, while high, is not 15%. In 2003 it was 9.6%, again per the spooks.

    Parent is a TROLL.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL by sgt_doom · · Score: 1, Informative

      The unemployment stats for countries is not relative - the USA greatly underreports our unemployment rate - France realistically reports their true unemployment rate - PLUS they are not offshoring their IT jobs! The CIA site reports stats as they are reported - period. Also, the efficacy of the CIA - after all the information that came out concerning tips and warnings to that agency about 9/11 - that they chose to ignore - is highly questionable. Please don't depend on government workers for anything today. Let's stick to the facts, jack!

    2. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The unemployment stats for countries is not relative - the USA greatly underreports our unemployment rate - France realistically reports their true unemployment rate

      Prove it. Otherwise you're just spouting more anti American bullshit.

  61. someone who spent two months proving the obvious-- by jswatz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's me, the reporter who wrote the story. What fascinated me about this is that everybody knows that workplace stress is a problem, but you rarely see the dots connected. There's a lot of fascinating research out there -- especially the Scandinavian studies showing links between change in the workplace and illness. Anyway, I didn't mean to stress y'all out. But I have to say that I did think of slashdotters often while I was writing it...

    --
    "speaking only for myself since 1957"
  62. Bullshit. Without stress nothing gets done! by msgilligan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure stress may cost $300 billion per year in related costs, but the absence of stress would eliminate at least half of the remaining $11,000 billion in U.S. GDP.

  63. Dr. Guy Standing by NoNine · · Score: 0

    "It's an issue everywhere you go in the world," said Dr. Guy Standing.

    That is soooo weird! That's why I'm on disability now, from too much standing!

  64. Re:399 driik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry/. i just started rninking like 3 weeks ago.. id ont tjhink i need AA yet. altohugh alcoholism runs inthe fmaily

    iom just trying tos ee what being drunk is klike. and i had way to much vodka tpongih.. ill never driubk agaiun bbbbbbbbb

  65. Re:Please do the math for odds of becoming "The Ma by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    So you'd prefer they be able to do nothing, in your "welfare state"?

    I'd rather fight to give this guy a job, rather than a handout.

  66. Re:399 driik by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    If you are drinking to get drunk AND drinking alone, you need AA. And if you know it runs in the family, why take the chance of falling into the ugly life of a drunk?

    My father had a drinking problem, so I'm careful with my drinking.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  67. Entitlement by aka-ed · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As a member of the unemployed, I have to cover the costs of my own stress. How do I get my fair share of that $300 billion?

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    1. Re:Entitlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why aren't you at monster.com right now?

  68. This couldn't come at a better time by bobbabemagnet · · Score: 1

    I just recently graduated from college, started an internship, moved away from my home, and left everything that I knew with no idea what my future would be like.

    Since then I have developed an ulcer, suffer frequent tightness of the throat, and am more scared, lonely, and depressed than I have ever been.

    The odd part is that I love my job. Tomorrow I'm going back to see my girlfriend. Maybe my time with her will help me relax.

    1. Re:This couldn't come at a better time by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience except I got a real paycheck and my ulcer was from drinking too much coke. I got over it by becoming an irc slut and poinking my way into being excessively jaded. It helped, though...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:This couldn't come at a better time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. They still can't find my digestive problem's cause, but I noticed every time I go on vacation it goes away and every time I go back to high stress it comes back. hmmm...

    3. Re:This couldn't come at a better time by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      I'm 26, have got acid reflux that gives me no end of pain if i go off the meds for it, stress headaches most days, and tension in the shoulders massage barely manages to move.

      I've been working for coming up five years, and know that I have another 40 or so to go before retirement, and frankly it scares me how my body is reacting to the corporate life. I'm meant to be in the prime of life, but i sure don't feel like it.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
  69. Re:Things are looking up for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, I'm unemployed now (laid off) so my stress doesn't hurt anyone's company or bottom line. :)

  70. I Am the man by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    At least for myself. And I am a harsh boss - no drinking until at least 3pm! My stupid dot-com went bust, like so many others, so, now, I work for myself.

    When I am not working I relish the fact that I am saving thousands ($USD) per month in taxes, so the lack of income really isn't that bad, since I don't aquire every "Ooooh, Shiny iPod/Beemer/Opteron" piece of crap that passes in front of me.

    When I am working, I can easily take in $10 - $12K per month. Taxes eat almost half of it, but I always stash plenty away as a "stress reducer", for later.

    There would be a lot less stress in the world if people didn't buy more than they could afford. I have zero credit card debt, and own my cars. I could have bought beemers, but paying cash for Toyotas is so much less stress. Plan to live on a "flippin burgers" income and just think of all the stess-reducing beer money you will have when you earn more!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  71. Spinning wheels? by earlgreen · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In actual fact, a lot of the work done in those long hours is BS busy work that's either pandering to the overblown ego of some nutso boss or tied up in Dilbertesque office politics and ridiculously heavy "business process". When's the last time you worked in a place that actually had a concept of what work leads to a better bottom line, and focused only on that? How much of the average job could be tossed out the window with no impact to the company's profitability? I wonder how the cost of basic inefficiency stacks up against this $300B.

  72. Thank heavens by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    ...I was beginning to worry about the private health sector. I love neo-liberalism, the deserving always benefit!

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  73. I did my part.... by cbdavis · · Score: 1

    My heart attack in Feb 2003, ran to the tune of around $17000 ( hospital, angiogram, ER). My 35 years of working in the highttech field finally culminated in a life changing event. Doctors final Rx was that I have handled all that stress in a bad way. So, now I go hiking more, eat better, less booze, and less work. Will it make a difference? Who knows.

  74. ACK, your post causes me stress by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    I fear I'm going to get stuck in a feedback loop of doom. This is causing me stress. Like its just the start of a chain reaction of stress we can't escape. www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA my page rocks for neo philosophers.

  75. Iraq war costs 500 billion by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Therefore it must be worth a year and a half of stress. Please read my page: www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA

  76. TRUE! unemployment is actually twice "official" # by Romothecus · · Score: 2, Informative
  77. The Industressful America by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    It didn't used to be this way. It's the industrial revolution that has converted America from a country of Apprentiships and Entrepreneurs to a predominately "factory worker" population. If you weren't already the boss, you were working to get the skills to become your own boss, and how much stress do you suppose evaporates when you have true control over your own destiny? Sure, there'll still be rough spots, but not to have the axe in somebody elses hands hanging over your head. Calling your own shots, hours and such...

    There needs to be a popular revolution back to that mentality, personally.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  78. Stressssss by phrostypoison · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've recently been stressing out myself due to stress of trying to hide myself from stressing. It didn't work. I am still stressed out of stress! Say, anyone here invest STRS?

  79. Cycle. by Geekwad · · Score: 1

    But this money, that goes into medical bills, out of business products, etc, is all circular. It's pumped back into the economy. The autonomy, stress and other medical expenses, getting drunk after work and all the rest of it, is part of the system. And the system works. At least so far.

    --

    - http://pakman.sytes.net/
    1. Re:Cycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking of things in terms of the circular flow model can be misleading because there are leaks in the flow. Eventually some of that money will leave the country, and our trade deficit insures that it won't come back as quickly as it left.

      Second of all, not all of these costs are tangible costs, some of them are opportunity costs. Let's say a CEO has to choose between two policies, one that marginally increases productivity for a short period but results in decreased productivity over time due to stress, and another policy that results in higher productivity over time due to reduced stress. Productivity is net output per manhour and so reduced productivity either results in reduced output or hiring more labor and increasing costs. So taking the more stressful policy results in an opportunity cost equal to the difference in revenue and/or labor costs between the two policies.

      Now some people will say that there are cases where the productivity spike at the beginning of the stressful policy could be of greater value than the improved overall productivity of the second policy if it results in getting a task done faster gives the company an advantage in the market. However, if you want to prove that this is the wisest course of action, you need to show that the additional profit gained can be used to offset the fact that your workers can't match their previous productivity without some time to recover.

    2. Re:Cycle. by mikera · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The whole idea of "the money going back into the economy" is an oft-repeated fallacy.

      It's a good idea to avoid confusing "money" with economic wealth. They are actually only very loosely linked, and the fact that money continues to circulate is largely irrelevant to whether the economy does better or worse.

      As an example, let's say a falling tree crushed your car and you buy a new one for £20,000 (no insurance - damn). You are worse off by £20,000. Other people (car dealer, company, suppliers etc.) are on aggregate better off by £20,000 minus the full cost of making and selling one car.

      Money supply hasn't changed for the economy as a whole - the £20,000 just changed hands. But the economy as a whole is worse off by the cost of making and selling one additional car.

      In the same way, money spent on medical expenses casued by stress absolutely does represent a real loss to the economy as a whole. The size of the loss here is the cost of providing those medical services.

      Whether this loss is worth it or not due to other benefits of a stressful work environment is, of course, a separate question.

    3. Re:Cycle. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      That's true, but I've seen these calculations before (on issues like computer viruses) and they fail to take into account the sales made to certain business areas. You can't say "this cost the country $n billion" if you only look at it in very simple terms (like saying "x hours lost * cost per hour"). Apart from the fact that more drugs are sold, there's also the fact that one company losing a sale may result in another company gaining said sale. If an industry is considerably oversupplied, it may make little difference. If no-one is going to call you anyway that day and your business has no work, taking the day off resulted in no sales lost.

      The time when it makes a difference is when you look at the effect on foreign trade. If your workers are stressed, and don't make the sale, some Japanese or Indian firm will. If the anti-stress drugs are from the UK, what's the effect then?

      The real question is better spent thinking on "is it the right thing to do?". Like funding Eurofighter or the Olympics - both are sold to the public on the "it will regenerate an area/create jobs" - but in both cases, it will distort markets in other ways, and be completely unnatural.

  80. why is everybody stressed and worried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in this society too and I don't feel any stress at all, I have plenty of time to acomplish my tasks, I deliver when it is required and I fix my schedule at convenience.

    I reallly don't get it, why so many people take pills to sleep, pills to wake up and pills to ignore everyone else.

    Maybe it is the fact that I'm unemployed :D

  81. Less stressed, but just as industrious, Europe by Cryofan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But what about Europe: they are less stressed, but the Industrial Revolution started there!

    The reason they are less stressed is because their governments have restrained the amount of leverage that employers may apply to the employee.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Less stressed, but just as industrious, Europe by Inda · · Score: 1

      Europeans are less stressed ay?

      I'm less stressed because of adrenalin beta-blockers not the government.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Less stressed, but just as industrious, Europe by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      The reason they are less stressed is because their governments have restrained the amount of leverage that employers may apply to the employee.

      And increased the amount of leverage the government itself may apply to the employee and employer alike.

    3. Re:Less stressed, but just as industrious, Europe by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but why should it be the government's job to restrain the amount of leverage that an employer may apply to an employee? First, that's what unions are for. Second, employers that treat their employees like crap tend to have a high turnover rate, which ultimately costs them more money. It's a self regulating system.

      In fact, some would say that Europe's reliance on the government, while less stressful (a debatable topic in and of itself) is ultimately not in the best interests of the people.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
  82. Re:399 driik by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Everyone drinks to get drunk, that's the whole point. As for drinking alone, what's wrong with that? Not everyone has people to drink with. Leave him alone, you're a boring puritan bastards.

  83. (OT) Re:It's all about balance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Man, what a downer you are. ;)

    Actually, you're right. She really is the one thing tying me down, not that I resent it. Truthfully, I think this fact speaks highly of her character. If I break up with her, I'm off to Thailand or Burma for ordination.

    But don't forget the noble examples of the laity! Queen Mallika and Pasenadi Kosala come to mind. The Buddha himself praised dedicated and loving relationships, impermanent as they may be.

    (Posting anonymously to avoid karma hit for going OT)

    1. Re:(OT) Re:It's all about balance. by identity0 · · Score: 1

      (Posting anonymously to avoid karma hit for going OT)

      Only on Slashdot would a discussion of Buddhism give you bad karma ; )

  84. solutions to health problems... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    the over weight problem can be greatly improved by removing the cheap and poisonious sweatner of high frutose corn suryp from teh american diet (shown to increase triglicerides by 1/3)

    the work place stress matter can be improved by removing the use of such things that inherently cause additional work, such a the use of any MS OS. For in the drive to make people need them, MS has incorporated the manifestation of the intelligence insulting user frustration function.

    the solutions are clear, but the problem with implimenting them is two fold, one of which is money related (ie. HFCS is cheap cheap cheap), and the other is failure to communicate the solution (ie. MS marketing skill has nothing to do with honesty.)

    1. Re:solutions to health problems... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I don't know why Americans complain about stress. Go to some third world countries and see how the sweat shops work, and I guarantee there are few American job conditions that even compare.

      Many still use punch cards like systems, and wages are subtracted by the minute for every second they become unproductive. Americans do work many hours, but they remind me of the olympic US basketball team. By world standard, they have the best skills, but they are lazy and downright spoiled and whiny.

    2. Re:solutions to health problems... by NBarnes · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree totally. These ideas that US workers have, about 'living wages' and 'human work environments' and 'my life is not my work', they make me sick. What a bunch of whiners. Not like those stand-up Chinese factory workers who know how lucky they are to have jobs at all.

  85. Firstly.. some Gmail invites for grabs! by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    Before someone mod me down as -1 OT (well, my karma is already pretty bad, so who cares!), I'd like to share some extra Gmail invites that I've got, without getting my mailbox getting bombed, so just get the links from here:

    http://blah.infosynaptics.com/

    Anyway back on topic, is it any surprise the stress levels are rising all the time? Wasn't it just hours ago when we had the other news article http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/04/124420 7&tid=126&tid=98&tid=1

    With the bad economy, war on "terror", rising job demands, credit cards, debts.. well, you name it, America got it! It is really no wonder why life is getting more and more stressful!

    On the bright side it is easier to get porn nowadays than anytime in history =)

  86. I figure I break even by mod_parent_down · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since I relieve my stress by chilling out, listening to the $20 million worth of CDs I ripped onto my computer.

  87. Re:Bullshit. Without stress nothing gets done! by maximilln · · Score: 1

    but the absence of stress would eliminate at least half of the remaining $11,000 billion in U.S. GDP.

    No wonder we're living in a welfare state. Looking at some of these links tells me exactly what I've always wanted to know.

    In one form or another, the federal government alone will manage to tax your entire paycheck away from you.

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  88. Re:Things are looking up for me by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    In the immortal words of Kryten, "grind those balls, sir!"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  89. Related Article (Business 2.0) by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was an interesting article about the different mentality regarding work hours in Europe in the August issue of Business 2.0 entitled All Work, No Play? It Doesn't Pay. (hope this link works for everyone)

    I think the subtitle speaks for it self : "European companies get it, but when will their workaholic American counterparts? Longer hours don't always add up to better work."

  90. Interesting, but hardly conclusive by topher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Workplace stress costs the nation more than $300 billion each year in health care, missed work and the stress-reduction industry that has grown up to soothe workers and keep production high, according to estimates by the American Institute of Stress in New York

    Seems kind of useless to know that stress costs $300 billion per year without knowing the benefits of that stress. Surely some of this stress results in increased productivity. (I know I never get work done unless I have a deadline.)

    Also, how much of this stress is preventable? Surely every culture has some degree of stress. How much would it cost to treat this baseline level of stress in the current American medical system? Without knowing that, it's impossible to tell to what extent this means Americans are really stressed out, or whether this is just another indication that we're relatively well-off and consume lots of expensive health care.

    Workers who report that they are stressed, said Steven L. Sauter, chief of the Organizational Science and Human Factors Branch of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, incur health care costs that are 46 percent higher, or an average of $600 more per person, than other employees

    Similarly, this could just reflect that those who have stressful jobs also have excellent health plans and thus consume more health care.

  91. By applying stress ... by GringoGoiano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Business gets a $2 trillion (number pulled from nether regions) boost in profits by applying stress. $.3 trillion is a small price to pay, and it's not even business' burden to foot the bill.



    Get real. Stress motivates, and it's an integral part of business strategy.

    1. Re:By applying stress ... by deaddrunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not when you can't sleep at night because you're so stressed out about the next day at work, or have no time to relax because you have to work at home.
      I've taken a 50% pay cut to escape from an environment like that and I've never been happier. Being rich is nice but not when you're freaking out trying to keep up with the crappy culture that exists at far too many companies.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    2. Re:By applying stress ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yep. Had a manager once who thought just like you...

      Sure enough, he did manage to scare his team into extraordinary levels of work (notice how I didn't say productivity).

      For about three months. Then his best person announced he was leaving for another job. That's OK, the manager thought, I'll just shift the burden over to my remaining people. A couple pf weeks later, employee no. 2 and shortly thereafter employee no. 3 bailed for better pastures.

      Manager's public response: "Fuck 'em. I can have a hundred resumes tomorrow."

      Yep, sure enough he could. But it turns out that it took longer than he expected to find the "right" people, and hey, what do you know, it took quite some time for the new people to get up to speed.

      In which time, everything fell apart. Oh my, how could you have seen this coming? Who could have foretold the tragedy? Cracking whips and screaming tantrums and motivation through fear causes you to lose your best people, increases hours while decimating productivity and will ultimately put you out of business.

    3. Re:By applying stress ... by flyfisher · · Score: 1

      Touche. And as for the replies to this parent...

      No one is forced to work anywhere they don't want to. If your manager is a dick-head, work somewhere else. It is a self correcting system anyway. Someone who applies too much pressure will have a high turn over rate which will, over time, cost a business too much money for the short term gains of over working your staff in a sadistic manner.

      There is no such thing as a no-pressure environment. I've worked for the DoD and as a private software consultant and if there is no pressure at work, you're fooling yourself. What we are really talking about is a "reasonable" amount of pressure. That is a highly subjective term that is unique to each of us. It is our personal responsibility to work where we fit, not make the world fit us.

      --

      d4,...,Nf3, or maybe I should use a Ratfaced Mcdougal?
    4. Re:By applying stress ... by goatan · · Score: 1
      Get real. Stress motivates, and it's an integral part of business strategy.

      A business strategy that plans to produce bad work (but on time of course as thats more important than quality)and stiff the customer

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

  92. French economy is mostly black market now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in France, illegal or controlled substances are where the money's at. Stuff like deodorant, mouthwash, soap, laundry detergent...

  93. Sleep vs Stress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya well stress may cost that much but SLEEP costs this country 5 trillion dollars every year!!!

    And don't get me started on sadness, family time, pets, cars, life, pregnacy, happiness, football, video games, internet, being distracted, and haxor'ing!!!

    Compared to those, stress is a minor money loser.

    What I figure is best for this country is to simply eliminate all emotions what-so-ever. That and lots and lots and lots of methamphetamines.

    The source of our weakness and loss or productivity is because of our human weaknesses.

    My solution?

    Eliminate all humanity thru a extensive proccess of cyboranization and re-education camps, followed up by ruthless military dominance of this sector of space.

    It may take a while, and it may not happen in my lifetime, but hey! Goals are goals after all, and that's more then what I can say for most of you slackers around here.

    YOU WILL BE ASSIMELATED! RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!

    Umm... WTF did that come from? Oh well.. I wonder were my medication is at...

  94. Close, but... by solios · · Score: 1

    People want to keep their jobs. Gainful employment within the skillset isn't exactly going to fall in your lap in this country.

    As a rule, only shitty-paying, shitty jobs drug test. (as well as a few areas where it makes some degree of sense, like pilots...). A former roommate was a stockboy at a drug store and got tested at random. I subtitle video and I've never, ever been tested. I've also had a few drinks on the job from time to time, but it's usually on the boss's dime. :)

    My job doesn't even come close to paying well, but I'll take a good amount of vacation, minimal responsibility, and a few weeks of OMFGWTF a year over being too OMFGWTF!!!!1ed to enjoy the paycheck. I like having enough energy at the end of a day to work on my own shit, and haven't been able to keep any job that takes that away from me.

  95. This is nothing... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    If you think stress is expensive, see how much a trip to Hawaii costs.

    Or, alternatly, see how much stress you're under when you don't have a job AFTER that vacation. I had a friend working at Accenture. He had 8 weeks vacation time due him(saved up), but he knew if he actually used it he'd probably wouldn't have a job when he came back.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  96. You people have it all wrong by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Saying stress cost us $300 billion a year assumes our economy exists to maximize overall wealth and happiness. In point of fact, our economy is built around making a select few staggeringly wealthy. All enonomies throughout history have been. Right now we're not really noticing this because Globalization has allowed most people in developed countries to be comfortable w/o having that 1% of the populace who won't settle for less than their every desire compromise a few of the more extravagant ones.

    But as the rest of the world developes, we're running into serious resource shortages. As these shortages start to be felt, the greedy won't scale back their extravagance, so the rest will be made to suffer. The stress will be increased, your health will go to hell. But it won't matter, since there are plenty of fresh bodies to replace you, just waiting to be used up. Right now this is an issue because society can afford to coddle it's workers while letting that 1% live like they always have (the phrase 'live like a king' didn't just come out of nowhere). Wait and see. The response to a study like this won't be treating workers better, it'll be discarding them faster.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  97. To stressed... by quinkin · · Score: 1

    I'm to stressed to think about this... Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  98. Heh, ooh shocking by Zareste · · Score: 1

    Seems like people will never get it though their heads that nobody benefits when you force people around just to make more cash. Of course, what you're thinking is 'oh, the guys upstairs benefit plenty' but nope, fewer people will want to work for them, those who do will only work the required minimum, and the presidents and managers lose money, gain stress, and of course think "omg this means we need to make life worse for the employees now!"

    Yeah it's kinda pointless for me to write about it, but it seems like we've only progressed a few inches from the days when people were forced to work in mines.

    --
    I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  99. this just in... by null-sRc · · Score: 2, Funny

    sleep nearly halves the world economy!

    all those man hours lost; for what?

    just so some fat cats can make money selling pajamas and pillows?!

    so come on people, pop those caffeine pills and stop hindering the economy!

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
  100. As long as by m1chael · · Score: 0

    those very stressed people buy Amercian prozac and use American shrinks then you aren't losing anything.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  101. I blame economists. by Simon · · Score: 1
    How can a country lose $300 billion in productivity and still be the most productive country in the world?
    I suspect it is because of the way productivity is usually measured, by using the GDP. A big chunk of that $300 billion shows up in the GDP as a profit, not a loss. When someone gets sick and spends $500 on medical, that $500 gets counted as productivity in the health sector. Same goes for any medication, psychologist visits, the whole stress-reduction industry, etc etc.

    --
    Simon

    1. Re:I blame economists. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Exactly.

      I had a discussion with a friend about the cost of viruses based on some figure on the radio, and pointed out that a huge amount of the cost would have been people taking their computer to a repairman to get it disinfected. That costs the country almost nothing because the repairman is part of the country.

      The only real cost in the above example is that a business isn't productive which means it can't take orders etc. Which means another company gets the order. In this case, it may be that another UK company gets the trade or a foreign competitor. The likely cost is probably more like 10% of that quoted.

  102. Last Post! by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Har har, lp again!

  103. Re:Death is Nature's Way of Telling You to Slow Do by Teun · · Score: 1
    You only have one life. Working excessive hours will not make your penis/boobs larger.

    Ahh, you've found the essences of life!!
    Maybe you've read a lot of spam...
    :-))

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  104. Re:399 driik by Teun · · Score: 1
    Hehe, indeed that's one of the undeniable side effects of too much stress.
    Just sad some dick head sees it as Offtopic, it couldn't be more Ontopic

    I'm glad to live in Europe where the wine is cheaper.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  105. Not sure I credit the numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    300 billion USD, eh?

    It this a real, sane figure, or is it like FAST supposing every illegal copy of software would otherwise have been bought?

    There is *no* critical assessment of this figure or the report which led to it, and the body of the article is a repetition of data which, again at face value, supports the notion that workplace stress is high and/or rising.

    This is not news, it's not science; it's pulling numbers out of a hat ("I'll use *this* report") and then choosing anecdotes and isolated reports which back up the chosen POV.

    It may be there is true in the assertation, but I would not be able to know this from this report.

    --
    Toby

  106. But the truth is more amusing.... by ReKleSS · · Score: 1

    The way I see it:
    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 05, @13:37 (#10160635)
    Yes, I'm very bored.
    -ReK

    --
    md5sum -c reality.md5
    reality: FAILED
    md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 computed checksum did NOT match
  107. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be shot in your fucked head.

  108. Good for you, man by Sviams · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting interpretation, but I think you kinda missed the whole point of the GP.
    The idea is not that you reduce stress by stockpiling money instead of spending it, which may be a general difference between europeans and americans as pointed by a previous poster. In no way does that correlate to the amount of stress these people submit themselves to when acquiring said amounts of money.

    No, friends, what the Buddhists along with several other less-respected-in-the-eyes-of-capitalism movements have figured out lies on a deeper level, and without going into detail, it involves realising that excessive greed for whatever reason is a serious hindrance on the path to true happiness.

  109. You're making the broken window fallacy by guybarr · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  110. Problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a really good idea for WASPs. If you're a minority, you'll have problems in the Midwest with racism, etc.

  111. download link for the study itself by owen+boswarva · · Score: 2, Informative

    'Economic Security for a Better World' (ILO -International Labour Organization)
    (5.49MB PDF)

    password: universe

  112. Sadly, this is actually *efficient*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't you think corporations get more than $300 billion worth of labor from all this slavedriving? It's efficient for them to do this, that's why they do it. What's a couple of thousand heart attacks among the underlings compared to the CEO's big yacht?

    We need a real labor movement in this country.

  113. Stress...self made...get over it... by AetherBurner · · Score: 1

    Real simple...if your job is too stressful for you, then you are there by your own choice and no one elses. Don't like the stress, you have options: Find a different job, learn to deal with it or, in my case, make hay out of it. I put in my eight hours at full tilt when the office has me but come M1ll3r T1m3, I forget the office. I do that so well that I forget who I talked to the previous day. The stress present is a useful tool and learning how to use it without getting to you is the key. Yes, the Europeans love their long vacations - you can't ever get your european business partner because they are always on Holiday. But we can fix issues far faster than they can because they are never around to do the honest work. They just ride on the laurels of others.

  114. Stupid bogus statistics by epine · · Score: 1


    Stupid bogus statistics cost American businesses one trillion dollars a year in lost credibility.

  115. Re:Why we Americans accept this situation by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    You wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    This is something what I've been wondering for a while. Having American relatives and seen the work environment, it's hard for me to understand why do you accept the situation ?

    >>>>>>>>.

    Most Americans do not even know how good most Europeans. How would they know? Other than a few newspaper articles, the information is simply not commonly made available. However, there is a growing awareness of how good most Europeans have it. But then that knowledge is limited to the fact that most Europeans work fewer hours per year. But there are so many other differences, especially with regard to the social safety net.

    AMericans simply cannot appreciate how much worry it takes off of your shoulders to know that if you cannot keep your job, you will not need to be homeless. Americans do not know that i most countries in Europe, if you do lose everything, even if you are an ablebodied young person, the govt will pay for housing and food. And AMericans are probably not aware of how little college students pay for their education in Europe (heck, I think denmark even pays for all housing and food and other expenses of all college students).

    Also, Americans have been subjected to a very intensive regimen of propaganda from an early age. THey have been trained to think of other people are basically evil, and not to trust other people. Also, they have been bombarded with propaganda telling them that everyone can be rich in America, if only you work hard. How the hell the logic on that one works, I have no idea.

    I mean, the very defintion of "rich" means that you are in the minority with respect to wealth, so that if you are rich, then most other people must be poorer than you.

    Talk about "turtles all the way down" thinking!!

    Also, our system of government and our Constituion was set up long ago in order to protect the wealth of slaveowners who exploited slaves and indentured servants. That Constitution, that same evil document, is still very intact today. And it has created an electoral system that has first-past-the-post, winner-take-all architecture. This electoral system does not allow for left or right wing politics, only centrist politics. which plays right into the hands of the wealthy and the corporations. All meaningful reforms are thus stifled by the extremely undemocratic electoral system.

    Of course almost all other western nations have far more democratic electoral systems, which is why they have multiple parties, proportional representational systems (or hybrid proportional representational systems).

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  116. Re:399 driik by edinho · · Score: 1

    ... a boring puritan bastards.

    With multiple personalities disorder to boot! :-P

  117. Type A American perspective by cygtoad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Leave it to us Americans to write a story with this type A perspective. Oh my God! Do you realize how much strss cost each year? Let's stress about the cost of stress! Is stress only a problem to the extent that it impacts our pocket book? No. This kind of stuff just convinces me that we are so far from a solution on this as a nation, that we are nearly hopelessly lost. Why don't we stress about that too?

  118. The Fatal Flaw in Your Logic by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Europe!

    Why then have Europeans deliberately created a different model? Are human beings fundamentally different there than here in America?

    THat (loathsome) neoliberal thinking that you are trotting out here has been bought into by Americans, but only when they do not know about how Europeans work.

    You are the one who is out of touch.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  119. Re:399 driik by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    You should probably take this test to see if AA is for you.

    Drinking is a social intereaction with friends. Doing it alone or just so you can get drunk is a bad thing.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  120. You have to make a very concious decision by nomadicGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess I am lucky to have had a few good role models growing up and early in my career. You should pick the 1 or 2 most important things that need to be done, knock them out, and then move on to the next 1 or 2. Concentrating your effort and attention gives much better results. You get more done in less time and you make fewer mistakes. It is much more effective and a lot less stressful.

    One of my first bosses is like that. The "fire fighters" as we called them would be running around frantically all stressed out about every problem. They always looked really busy and really stressed. He, on the other hand, would sit down and make a list of the problems and figure out how best to tackle the situation and then concentrate on one item at a time. He would get that one highest priority item done properly and then move on to the next. Sometimes people would get pissed at him for not working on 10 other things but he would stick with it and get them all done. The fire fighters would always look more busy and frantic but in the end they would accomplish very little and much of that would have to be redone.

    Never mistake activity for work. You have to be deliberate and figure out how to get the highest value out of your time. Work less, be more effective, make more money. That's my motto. Everybody gets the same 24 hours in a day. Its how you use them that counts.

  121. Oddly this reminded me of Hitler ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article talks about corporate (but I'll bet it applies to any org) :

    1) rapid expansion (Blitzkreig, and expansion into Russia, France, North Afrika),

    2) downsizing (later incursion by America/Russia/England)

    3) outsourcing (Japan ok maybe this is a stretch ;)

    I remember reading about how Hitler's health rapidly declined as the end neared, and I thought is he genetically inferior, b/c that would be ironic. Anyway, perhaps he had a significant decline in health because of the stress of all the above.

    1. Re:Oddly this reminded me of Hitler ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini

  122. Blame the Art of War by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    Too many executive think that running a business is like running a military campaign. (Conversley too many in this adminstration think that running a military campaign is like running a business.)

    The unfortunate fact is they never drill deeper than this loony premise. If the actually read the Art of War, Sun Tsu cautions that war is a dreadully expensive, resource sucking enterprise that should be the last resolrt when all other solutions have failed. When engaged in war you seek quick victory by throwing everything you have at the problem. And you pick your battles carefully so that you will be victortious in every encounter.

    The problem is that nobody sits down and outright reads The Art of War. They always read some economist/gladhander/business consultants's take on the Art of War, where they cherry pick choice quotes to make it sound like it's a no holds barred world where you can treat your underlings like conscripts.

    (Yes, there are elements of this in the Art of War. Then again there are elements of bigomy, incest, and murder in the Bible.) The crux of the AOW is that you win a war strategically. Ask anyone who has read one of these corporate raider manuals and that would say that business is won by having the best trained troops working at their most efficient with inventorties delivered just in time...

    In other words, it's hooey.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  123. Costs of Reducing Stress by haircut · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The stress may cost 300 billion, but would reducing it cost more?

    Why wouldn't this be an optimum level?

  124. Re:Please do the math for odds of becoming "The Ma by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1

    And I'd rather fight to build a world in which you didn't need a job, rather than trying to tear down others. Considering my field of expertise (automation systems), that's not a joke either.

  125. Time off, should be negotiated in hiring process by COredneck · · Score: 1

    If this option was offered, I would be more than happy to take a 25% cut in pay if I am allowed to take 3 months off each year such as during June, July, August. Too bad companies don't offer that option. It would be a great stress reliever. This would be a giant step to improving worker morale and this would even allow for the hiring of more unemployed people especially if some would prefer to take other seasons off.

    The way Corporate America operates is you would be lucky to be allowed to take two weeks off at the same time. By the time you finished a week's vacation, you are getting to the point of recharging and getting out of the de-stressing phase. However, you head straight back to work when you are ready to recharge. As a payback to taking vacation, you have the stress of playing catch up and since the working ranks are so thinned out, when you take vacation, work does not get done while you are gone.

    In my experience, I took 2.5 weeks of vacation in July and my manager flat out told me that he was not happy for me to take the time off. (BTW, I changed managers since Summer 2003) I also took a week off in June and I did not catch so much crap for that. That week off in June I was going to take it back in March and was going to be two weeks but there was so much that had to be done plus, getting a few people trained to do some of my work while I was gone under mgt's constraints that people I wanted to train were off limits (roadblocks).

    The workplace is at a point is if you have a job, it is expected that you put in 60 hour weeks or be unemployed. There is no happy medium. It is either overwork or no work. The price is besides the medical implications of stress, your family suffers such as you don't get to see your kids grow up, see your wife and spend quality time with her. One of the contributors of our high divorce rate and the problems our kids face due to lack of attention. Columbine shootings are a good example of kids who have little parental involvement since they were chasing the corporate dream.

  126. Companies are already addressing the issue by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 0

    By simply cutting health care benefits.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  127. Do you live in the "beautiful city of emphysema " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you, Ralph Spoilsport?

  128. Re:Why we Americans accept this situation by maximilln · · Score: 1

    While I do agree with the majority of what you've said I have to take issue with this:

    Also, our system of government and our Constituion was set up long ago in order to protect the wealth of slaveowners who exploited slaves and indentured servants

    I don't see that as being so. The Constitution was envisioned to be a document to keep government from meddling in the affairs of citizens. The Constitution wasn't protecting slavery then any more than its protecting slavery now. What is slavery but unfair compensation for work and the ability to buy and sell people as property? Sure, we've made it look prettier today, but we have headhunters, and temp agencies aren't really any better, and companies have no qualms about dropping 1500 workers at a shot so they can be recycled to the lowest bidder...

    I guess I envision that the authors of the Constitution wanted it to be a document which kept government (especially federal) to a small size that did little more than interact with other governments--none of this micromanaging meddling in the affairs of everyday citizens. I will agree that the usage of the Constitution has been twisted by those in positions of power to do what you say it has. :(

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  129. Random musings by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just some random musings, don't try to find a coherent train of thought...

    Some research suggests that people can't really concentrate well more than 6 hours a day (three hours in the morning, and three hours in the afternoon after a lunch break), if even that. Even so, try getting companies to let their employees off that easy.

    Among my friends are some people who work or worked for international companies such as Ericsson, Volvo or Saab-Scania. They said when they came to the US they thought it striking how most companies either didn't allow proper lunch breaks, or had employess who were eager to show how efficient they were. Instead of 40min-1 hour time to go to a resturant, most of the employees remained in their cubicles and ate some sandwiches while continuing their work.

    Also, while American workers stayed long, perhaps until 5-6 pm, there was a noticing slacking of pace in the afternoon. People pent more time talking around the water cooler, killing time by surfing or just staring into space. They were just mentally exhausted and couldn't do much efficient work, but they were still required to stay for several hours.

    One of my friends held a presentation about Swedish working conditions. When he talked about the generous working laws and vacations, such as 4-6 hours paid vacation per year minimum (even with "vacation bonus" to your salary, since you spend more when you are on vacation), the workers were amazed and the managers started to fidget and make unhappy faces. He wasn't allowed to do that presentation ever again. :-)

    I really liked a recent article in the Economist, that suggested that European and American productivity was about equal, Europeans just choose to sacrifice income in favour of more free times, and Americans were willing to sacrifice free time in favour of more money. Perhaps the old joke that Europeans work to live, and Americans live to work has some truth in it. I'm not looking down on people in the US, but I think I prefer our system.

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  130. Re:Time off, should be negotiated in hiring proces by TykeClone · · Score: 1

    Freelance and work for yourself - you can take all of the time off that you want that way, and no one would bitch at you for it.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  131. Paxil by ylikone · · Score: 1

    I have a lifetime of renewals of Paxil from my doctor. Works for me.... takes the edge off.

    --
    Meh.
  132. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To answer EVERY thread - think about it. If we lived under European style worker protection laws, many of us wouldn't be unemployed or forced into uncomfortable spots, because we wouldn't have had to use the only tool available to american employees - the threat of resignation.

    Think about it: remember that one good job you had? The pay was OK, the boss was OK, but one day something changed - a new policy, a new manager, whatever. With the protections in place, you could raise a stink without fear of persecution.

    This company (I mean country) really sucks. Even when it was an "employees' market", the employer still had the upper hand.

    Remember folks - our government is FOR, OF, and BY the PEOPLE - and remember, Bush thinks of us a big 10 year old child in need of his guidance.

    FUCK THIS SHIT! I am sick of seeing the once great united states turned into a fucking third world police state, replete with petty militaristic dictators, 60 hour work weeks (slavery is freedom people) etc, etc.

    I don't want socialism! I want reforms! I want to live to see grandchildren! Don't delude yourselves, our taxes are on par with what many Europeans pay, except our taxes get funnelled into the military-industrial complex - not to protect us and fight against our enemies (oh no, god forbid we actually respond to an attack, we just pay local warlords to make sure bin laden never gets captured), but rather to declare a perpetual war to slow down population growth among the lower classes, push the upper middle class firmly into the proletariat and to keep us all working 8am-7pm, Monday thru Saturday so we can afford our homes that we spend less time in awake than sleeping. We are all on the wheel.

    JESUS SAVE US! LIFT THE YOKE FROM BACKS! LET US STAND UPRIGHT! TAKE AWAY THE FALSE LEADERS WHO COMMIT SINS IN YOUR NAME!

  133. marijuana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a world w/ so much stress, why is pot illegal in so many places?

    All these anti-depressants and anti-anxiety drugs...

    I do telemarketing for microsoft, and nothing melts the stress away like a nice fat spliff. I love my SUPER stressful job because I'm always high!

    I also listen to a lot of bob marley and slack off like crazy. Be like me if you feel like living past 50.

  134. What's the cost of a stress-free environment? by flyingelephant · · Score: 1

    You have to wonder what the cost of a complete stress-free work environment would be. Is it possible that this would be more expensive in terms of lost productivity? What's the right level of stress?

  135. Long Hours = Good Employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think what we have brainwashed into believing those who work the most are the most dedicated, when in fact they may just be the least effecient, or, possible, the least qualified to do the job. Or pehaps the employer will not pay for the proper tools because he or she knows that the employee will donate the time neccesary to compensate for the substandard equipment. I am in a situation like that right now. Crappy cheap web designer are costing me a few hours a week of free time.


    Ya think? I'm posting this one AC for obvious reason.

    I'm a contractor. The project has slippped MASSIVELY from the schedule originally laid out when I hired on. One disaster after another (a daily occurance here it seems) and there's nothing I can do about it. Like I said, I'm a contractor. When my plate is empty or I see other things holding us up I consider it "ok" to leave work. I even put in less than 40 hours a week a couple of weeks in a row.

    Somebody came to me and said this was unacceptable. They didn't tell me I wasn't getting things done, just that I neeed to work more hours. Hey, sometimes there isn't anything for me to do. I'm waiting on other departments (legal mostly)... all I was told is to "work more" -- and I'm hourly!

    Now, when I work hourly I try and only bill for what I would call "hardcore time" -- the 30 minutes I spend on the phone with another consultant to solve his problem, the hour I spend doing email on the weekend -- stuff like that, I don't really bill for. They're "fringe" benefits that people get with my work attitude, and they only pay me when I'm running around as keyboard commando in their office for the most part. I've had to drop that practice with them... although the extra money is nice, I feel "dirty" for it.

    One of the weeks where I only put in 38 hours I actually spent the 2 hours I took off on the phone with people from work! I had to venture out a few towns away during business hours to pick up a gun that is rather difficult to find in the area. I'm on my cellphone almost the entire time during the drive -- but I didn't BILL for that time. Guess I should now.
  136. Leisure Time by awol · · Score: 1

    This is all such a crock. Leisure time did not exist until the Victorian Age. Without leisure every aspect of ones existence is focussed on sustenance the only reason for the absence of stress in that existence is the complete absence of anything against which to compare the intolerable burden of everyday life.

    SO in less than than 150 years, the litany of benefits that are derived from all this "stress" are so extensive (and taken for granted); zero infant mortality, life expectancy, health, leisure, that to make a comparison between the life of the factory worker today and 100 years ago (even in america) stress, regardless of it's apparent magnitude is a very small price to pay.

    --
    "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
  137. Working in Sweden is quite sweet... by snarkasaurus · · Score: 1

    ...except at income tax time.

    1. Re:Working in Sweden is quite sweet... by Myolp · · Score: 1

      Sure, all of this benefits must be financed somehow. I rather pay high taxes so that all Swedes can enjoy a decent working environment.

    2. Re:Working in Sweden is quite sweet... by snarkasaurus · · Score: 1

      That's good for you, because if you maybe wanted to decide for yourself how to spend -your- money instead of letting some desk pilot do it, your stress level would be through the roof. ~:D Like the poor bastard trying to make a living running his company where all the workers get 5 weeks vacation plus plus plus.

      I'm a Canadian, we pay roughly 50% tax compared to income if you include everything. I lived for 10 years in the USA, and I'm here to tell you that lower taxes ROCK! Its called FREEDOM, fly down to Arizona and breath in a big lungful of it sometime.

      And before you start in on how the Americans don't have heathcare let me assure you that A) they do, lots of people lie about that, mostly socialists and B) if you have -money- you can -buy- healthcare. Most people have the money, the ones who don't get Medicare. Even bums and illegals get treatment.

      Unlike Canada, where you can't buy an xray even if your friggin' life depends on it. You wait in line until you die waiting, or you drive to the USA and buy your treatment with your paltry after-tax savings. The Mayo Clinic is full to the tits with Canadians. Why? If they wait for treatment at home they die waiting. No shit kids.

      But they still gotta cough up that 50%.

  138. no solution by twitter · · Score: 0
    ahhh, but then you have the stress of making others do your will. They never do. Just look to the low quality of commercial software for a proof. That low quality is more than a small part of the feeling most people have of a complete lack of control in the workplace that leads to stress.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:no solution by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Just look to the low quality of commercial software for a proof.

      That was there even before the Outsourcing Mania; it just wasn't that bad because the systems were less complex. Good old times when you could've got a complete schematics with your computer...

  139. Not always on, so there is stress. by twitter · · Score: 0
    My stress used to come from the not so always on world of Winblows. Simple things, like uptime greater than a day without lost work, getting files to different physical locations without elaborate set up, filtering email without losing any, email and other work that just vanished from the "servers" and other little things that the computers and the network was supposed to do. Knowing that my tools could let me down at any instant added much to daily stress. It all adds to the lack of control most people feel at work, even when they are the boss or owner.

    My world is soooooo much easier with software like KDE that uses ssh, sftp graphically without crashes, worms or other losing stuff. I don't know how people get by without easy and secure access to their data.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  140. How many workers get OT by trajano · · Score: 1

    I've met quite a few people in I/T shops in the US and even though the overworked worker does not become too efficient, you're still only paying for one worker and the standard rate since they generally do not get overtime pay.

    Also the maintenance of an additional worker would eat through the efficiency of having only one person who works to the bone in fear of losing his job.

    Once the person's worn out we can easily kick him out for saying that he is not efficient in his work and not too productive.

    --
    Archie - CIO-for-hire :-)
  141. Do what works for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do what works for you. Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater. Ancient religions have wisdom along with the nonsense; know which is which.

    To reduce stress, some ideas:

    Pretend the universe is beyond your control, and in any case is evolving and changing in a way that creates a better universe as time progesses - it just isn't always obvious. So relax, its all in good hands, so to speak.

    Pretend there are rules you must not break, and taking off one day out of seven to do NO WORK AT ALL IS ONE OF THOSE RULES - call it the sabbath.

    Pretend that after you die you will go to a better place, so relax; it'll all work out in the end.

    Think we can convince people to pretend these things so they can relax and be happier and healthier? You don't have to believe in God, the sabbath, and heaven - just ACT like you do.

  142. Stress??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What is stress? I thought stress was a seventies fad and dies out long ago.

    Stress was blamed for everything, from ingrown toenails to ulcers and it has all been proven bogus decades ago.

    Oh, well, what the hell...

  143. Re:399 driik by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Drinking is a social intereaction with friends.

    So you're saying that only popular people with friends are allowed to drink? And that other people who dare to drink have to go to AA meetings because they're obviously alcoholics? Drinking is not defined as social interaction, it's consuming alcoholic liquids.

    Doing it alone or just so you can get drunk is a bad thing.

    Says you, luckily your opinion is only a minority of puritans and Americans, everyone else gets by fine downing the pints without some busybody do-gooder interfering.

  144. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  145. I'd reply to this properly but... by syousef · · Score: 1

    I'd reply to this properly but I'm too stressed. Leave me alone!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  146. If you're a corporate drone, that's your own fault by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    You don't HAVE to work 80 hour weeks (that is, unless you NEED to get something done by a deadline and you're catching up).

    It's all in your head.

    If your place of employment is stressing you out and making you work double than what you're supposed to, then request double your salary.

    If they deny you, walk. It's easy, and better in the long run. Let some other brain dead zombie fill your spot.

    You might THINK you need that job, but you don't.. and you really won't see that until you're finally outta there. Go elsewhere.

    Better yet, find a job you actually like. I laugh whenever I hear people hating their job. No wonder you're stressed out, you're stuck 40 hours a week at a place you utterly despise because you think you have to.

    It's all in your head.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  147. you are not funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go suck a nigger's donkey ape cock.

  148. Stress/Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > How can a country lose $300 billion in productivity and still be the most productive country in the world?

    How can a country look at all the damaging effects of rampant stress and just think of money?


    The welfare of the people is more important than the wealth of the people. I think sometimes we in the US forget that.

  149. Karoshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > What I find interesting is that if this were about another country...

    ...we'd say the exact same thing. In fact, we DID say the exact same thing back in the 80's/90's when Japan was considered the over-work, over-stress capital of the world. Look up "karoshi" - it's the Japanese word for "death from overwork".

    Much as you might like to believe otherwise, this is not a case of everyone ragging on the US just because it's the US. This is a case of everyone ragging on overwork because overwork is bad, regardless of who's doing it.

    Sometimes when people say you're doing something bad, they're right. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you can stop shooting yourself in the foot.

  150. Re:399 driik by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Puritan? I am no such thing.

    It's your liver, abuse it in any way you wish..

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  151. Re:TRUE! unemployment is actually twice "official" by jd · · Score: 1
    A little way into the article, it mentions that the "updated" statistic isn't actually complete, either. You need to add 1.7% for the prison population. You probably need to add 3-4% for the "hidden" population (people who don't appear on any national statistic) such as transients and isolated populations that are too difficult to count.


    The "less rosy" picture gets positively gloomy.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  152. You said it best. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    One can smell the cluelesness of youthfull thinking in your post.

    To work more to be exploited? A company is not doing you a favour when they employ you sonny, it is a contract of mutual covenience and it will only take a couple of "downsizings" to drill in your skull that you should look for your best interests and not to unsettle established giants with kick-ass products.

    Companies that manage to upset giants do it mostly for being in the right place at the right time (i.e. they got lucky), not necessarily for any forward thinking or sweat-shop mentalitly.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  153. No problem. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Europeans will fund defense, not imperial adventures.

    Real defense is immensily cheaper than arbitrary "nation building".

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  154. Who told you you are the most productive? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Check this please Productivity measures in the OECD countries.

    You may produce the most, consume the most, but you are certainly not the most productive country.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  155. Ah the differences.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I went for half an hour walk, and watched my 9 year old TV.

    Needless to say I can save quite a bit each month.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  156. SOCIALISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but Sweden is a *socialist* state, which makes them *evil*, according to both of the two conservative parties who run the US (sigh).

  157. Germany vs. US by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

    I've worked in both Germany and the United States, and believe me, the workplace in Germany is a lot less stressful. They work fewer hours per day and get a lot more vacation days per year.

    I found that Germans do indeed have work ethic to an extent. They are a lot more productive during the hours they are at work, but despite popular belief, they are actually rather lazy. They don't like to work, but when they do work, they do it very efficiently.

    I think the amount of work Americans do tends to wear them out a bit and makes them less productive per hour worked. That very well may lead to even more hours worked: not a good thing.

    I got a lot more free time working in Germany than working in the U.S.

  158. Re:Here We Go Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bzzzt. Wrong, just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean they must be juveniles, you pedantic ass. A huge portion of us are likely much older and more experienced than you.

    How about less condescension and flaming on your part and a little more consideration of alternative points of view?