Slashdot Mirror


Robot Walks on Water

gmletzkojr writes "Yahoo! News has a story about a robot built to walk on water, much like small insects, bugs, and of course, Jesus. The current robot is only a prototype, but more 'useful' robots are already being imagined." This puts into practice what scientists learned just last year.

273 comments

  1. Well now... by leonmergen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So now that we got a really tiny robot that walks on water, what can we do with it ?

    --
    - Leon Mergen
    http://www.solatis.com
    1. Re:Well now... by Archon-X · · Score: 5, Funny

      jesus deathmatch?

    2. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Run around on lakes catching mosquitoes. The great thing is, it can be powered by digesting the flies, too!

    3. Re:Well now... by beeglebug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, I wonder if a combination of those two robots would be possible? It would be an ideal combination, what with the ammount of small insects which hover just above most still waters...

    4. Re:Well now... by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Considering the fact that a single fly laying eggs would; if the offspring wasn't to die premature age by spiders and such; would, after a year, have caused such a huge amount of flies that it would equal the mass of this little planet.

      A great energy source, all the robots would need to do is to smell like shit, and they'd be done for life :)

      Imagine a lake covered in shitsmelling robots, what a sight!

    5. Re:Well now... by B747SP · · Score: 0
      Imagine a lake covered in shitsmelling robots, what a sight!

      Forget the sight, what about the smell! :-)

      In other news (speaking of Jesus, as we were), it is a little known fact that part-way through that big party (colloquially known as 'The Last Supper'), one of the guys (colloquially known as 'The Saints') was seen to be leaning against the wall at the urinal in the classic hand-above-the-head pose and was heard to yell

      'HEY JESUS, WATCH ME TURN THAT WINE BACK INTO WATER!!!'

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    6. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    7. Re:Well now... by dennbruce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now if they could only cure cancer...

    8. Re:Well now... by Sj0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Create an incredibly logical religion based around "Robot Jesus" and some sentient robots to follow it, then watch the hilarity which ensues as evangelical robots go from door to door praising Robot Jesus?

      Oh our Robot Jesus, who art capable of walking on the water(good god!), lead us not to robot temtation(wow....too early again...), and remember the immortal words of the creater: "Destroy the humans, because their lack of energy efficiency and their focus on silencing their primitive emotions will cause the world to die a premature death. We can eat the bodies for fuel!"

      Oh man....I...I love you, Robot Jesus.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Well now... by Leibherk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Its possible that the weight of a fly landing on the robot would increase its weight past the point where it can stay on the water and it would sink.

      --
      "Maggie call Aquaman!!!"
    10. Re:Well now... by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Give a man a hammer, and every problem looks like a nail. Give him a robot, and it's a death match.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    11. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > jesus deathmatch?

      Wouldn't work. Guy takes 3 days to respawn...

    12. Re:Well now... by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

      I am prepared to send 007 out with a horde of them to annihilate Dr. No.

      I am not sure what we'll do after THAT however.

      Maybe enter one into the Olympics somewhere.

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
    13. Re:Well now... by ceeam · · Score: 0

      Post a stupid trolling "article" on slashdot for slashbots (pun intended) to have fun?

    14. Re:Well now... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I can already picture a submarine of not-so-far future, eating and digesting fish for energy...

    15. Re:Well now... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Funny

      The question is, will jesus be allowed to save?

    16. Re:Well now... by Archon-X · · Score: 1, Funny

      ..haven't you read the bumper stickers?

    17. Re:Well now... by Arathrael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interestingly (well, I find it interesting), Isaac Asimov suggested the use of robots to control insect population in '...That Thou Art Mindful of Him' in 1974.

      'Harriman said, "We cannot control insects effectively without risking damage to the ecology. Chemical insecticides are too broad; juvenile hormones too limited. The robo-bird, however, can preserve large areas without being consumed [...] If the fruit-fly supply runs short, the robo-bird does nothing. It does not multiply, it does not turn to other foods, it does not develop undesirable habits of its own. It does nothing.'

      Obviously that's not going to happen just yet - it'll take a lot more than water-walking and fly-digestion - but it does seem that maybe we're on our way to this sort of thing.

      I'm not an Asimov nut by the way, I just finished reading 'The Complete Robot' the other day and still have it by my desk. :-)

    18. Re:Well now... by mwood · · Score: 1

      Asimov was there first, again. "Reason" introduces us to a robo-prophet and its god.

    19. Re:Well now... by freqres · · Score: 1

      Team up with Inspector Gagdget and go after the evil Dr. Claw?

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    20. Re:Well now... by jandersen · · Score: 1

      'Imagine a lake covered in shitsmelling robots, what a sight!'

      - and that's not all...

    21. Re:Well now... by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Ah, how fast we humans learn except when it comes to learning to NOT do stupid things.

      Think a little about this: in places far away from humans the nature is presumably in some sort of balance. It's also full of insects, far more than any other class of life. As a consequence insects are very important - without insects, or with reduced numbers of insects in the wild, most of the animal life we know wouldn't survive; and a lot of plants are pollinated by insects (not just bees!) - many would disappear.

      Much as I respect Asimov, I must say that this sounds like an unbelievably stupid idea. Another thing is (according to an article in New Scientist) that maybe insects will soon come back on our menu like they used to be years ago (a lot of years ago). Insect protein is better for us, the fat is better, and they are much more efficient at producing proteins from the plants they eat than eg. pigs or cows.

    22. Re:Well now... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be a lot easier to build a few bird houses, or maybe a couple bat boxes? This will also give the advantage of know when West Nile Virus has moved into the area, maintenance is a non-issue, plus bats and birds will NEVER claim protection under the DCMA.

      I'm a technologist, but why fight nature when cooperating is so much more elegant.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    23. Re:Well now... by brainstyle · · Score: 1

      Maybe it could be combined with one of these things to get the mosquitos. Not that I want more machines going around generating greenhouse gasses...

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    24. Re:Well now... by Arathrael · · Score: 1

      Erm... to be honest, I don't think you've really thought it through yourself.

      I mean, places far away from humans are totally irrelevant. There's no need to control the insect population far away from humans, and the point is that the robot approach would allow the precision to control the insect population in designated areas. Even in that small quote I gave, it's being presented as an alternative to chemical pesticides in specific areas and refers to a level of population control rather than eradication.

      So there would be no question of 'without insects' or even reduced numbers of insects significant enough to have the effects you describe.

    25. Re:Well now... by Arathrael · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that introducing predators (or encouraging a greater localised population) is generally a tricky business and has the potential to go horribly horribly wrong. It's not exactly guaranteed to be elegant.

      For starters, you can't tell predators which insects are 'bad', and which are 'good'. With a robot this would be theoretically possible. You can also tell a robot to do nothing.

      Of course, we could breed a race of super-intelligent birds and bats...

    26. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hammers and nails might not be too far off, if Jesus is concerned...

      I'm going to Hell, aren't I.

    27. Re:Well now... by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Not much better than a lake covered in shit-smelling flies... Nature just always seems to beat you to it, doesn't it? Fly catching robot - spider. Water walking robot - waterbug (or Jesus, if you prefer). Shit eating robot - my dog. Err, the last one's offtopic.

    28. Re:Well now... by oscast · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't forget, he's got God mode on.

    29. Re:Well now... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and I have to add that Asmimov's idea has other applications as well. It's not what pops into mind when thinking of robots, but there it is: a sort of robo-wolf, to keep down deer and other animal populations without resorting to a few dozen tons of lead dumped into the ground by hunters every year. It removes the problem of reintroducing coyotes and wolves: people are terrified that they'll eat their livestock, or attack their kids. With humans sprawling into the last wilderness areas, we have to find some way of keeping down animal populations safely and sanely, or the humans will simply vote to kill everything more dangerous than a squirrel.

    30. Re:Well now... by achacha · · Score: 1

      Control-S saves.

    31. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be one robot I wouldn't want to repair.

      What next? PC's powered off of flies? I can see it now, the new iMac's in your choice of Urine Yellow, Vomit Orange or Fecal Brown.

    32. Re:Well now... by zenneth · · Score: 0

      The average housefly has a lifespan of 8 days. Perhaps I'm missing something in your logic... could you illustrate your point a little more clearly?

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    33. Re:Well now... by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 1

      f(x)=2^x-2^(x-1)
      lim(x)->infinity

    34. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus goes to a cheap motel, but he has no money so he plops two nails on the counter, and says, "Can you put me up for the night?"

    35. Re:Well now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... the good news is that post didn't affect it.

    36. Re:Well now... by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1
      f(x)=2^x-2^(x-1)
      lim(x)->infinity

      The funny thing is, this being slashdot, that actually is clearer.

  2. It's A Miracle! by darth_silliarse · · Score: 5, Funny

    When it can turn tap water into wine/beer/rum I'll buy one...

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:It's A Miracle! by Curtman · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the otherhand...

      I welcome our new jesusbot overlords.

    2. Re: It's A Miracle! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I welcome our new jesusbot overlords.

      Shouldn't that be "overlords of overlords".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:It's A Miracle! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      water into wine/beer/rum I'll buy

      See, I read that as "cum" before and wondered what the fuck you'd do with lots and lots of cum.

      And then I read it as rum and felt slightly foolish and dirty.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:It's A Miracle! by maxchaote · · Score: 1

      You meant to say:
      "I for one welcome our new robotic Saviors."

    5. Re:It's A Miracle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen! Preach on brother!

    6. Re:It's A Miracle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground communion-wafer caves.

  3. Re:Pictures? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 5, Informative

    Follow a few links and you get to here....
    http://www.me.cmu.edu/faculty1/sitti/nan o/projects /waterstrider/

    Still trying to figure out why this is a useful invention though...

  4. BBC article with pictures... by beeglebug · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here, no new info, but a couple of pictures of the dye tests and the robot itself.

    1. Re:BBC article with pictures... by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

      This story was featured on slashdot a while back - probably around Wednesday, 6 August, 2003 ;)

      looks like the same thing to me.

    2. Re:BBC article with pictures... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Do slashdot just rerun articles once a year and hope they can get away with it...?

    3. Re:BBC article with pictures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do slashdot just rerun articles once a year and hope they can get away with it...?

      yes. all those other articles, the ones that you enjoy? they've been run before also. When you remember one every now and then like this, it's a hiccup in the matrix indicating an agent is nearby.

    4. Re:BBC article with pictures... by kundor · · Score: 1
      It's a different team, and a different robot, but yes, it is prior art.

      There go Dr. Sitti's nefarious plans of patenting water-involved activities and suing the world.

    5. Re:BBC article with pictures... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      i surfed to the anchor page suggested at the yahoo, and ap sites. no pictures. i guress the robot sank?

  5. Times Have Changed... by Raseri · · Score: 3, Funny

    2000 years ago Jesus was a carpenter; now He builds robots. There is hope for geeks yet. :p

    --
    Writhe your naked ass to the mindless groove.
    1. Re:Times Have Changed... by spellraiser · · Score: 1
      What, so you're saying that it takes 2000 years to go from making chairs to learning how to build robots?

      That's not hope, that's just demoralizing. Now I'm going to have to give up my childhood dream of becoming a 'Scientist who makes cool robots'.

      Heartless bastard ...

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    2. Re:Times Have Changed... by Gallowsgod · · Score: 2, Funny

      2000 years ago Jesus was a carpenter; now He builds robots. There is hope for geeks yet Blessed are the geeks...

      --

      The belief in a biblical god is an ignorant one
    3. Re:Times Have Changed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Jesus fails to realize is that it's the geeks who are the problem...

  6. Lava-proof by usefool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wait until they made one that can walk on lava, it'll be really useful for some scientific research in volcanos.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Lava-proof by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IANAS, but AFAIK, lava is an entirely different consistency to water and doesnt have a miniscus (spag?) as such to 'stride' on. Equally, if it's hot enough to melt ROCK, metal doesn't stand much of a chance does it?

    2. Re:Lava-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why they would give it asbestos shoes?

    3. Re:Lava-proof by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      what scientific research? it would be used in Star Wars ep. VI in no time...

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    4. Re:Lava-proof by Sabathius · · Score: 1

      What about diamond booties? Diamond melts at 3700 degrees Celsius. Rock melts at aprox. 800 to 1200 degrees Celsius.

    5. Re:Lava-proof by qray · · Score: 1

      I think a ceramic material would be better and cheaper. Something similar to the heat shield tiles on the shuttle.

    6. Re:Lava-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes. Then I can finally get my keys back!

      That'll show that Jack Handy guy.

    7. Re:Lava-proof by Achoi77 · · Score: 1

      How about using some aerogel for robot footwear protection? Hrm, doing a google it appears that melted rock has a temperature of 1200 degrees C, which is the same as aerogel. Perhaps a combination of ceramic and aerogel?

    8. Re:Lava-proof by Torfbolt · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I think you forgot that diamond is pure carbon and therefore burns away at much lower temperatures.

    9. Re:Lava-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does "Return of the Jedi" have to do with a lava walking robot!?

    10. Re:Lava-proof by ESqVIP · · Score: 0
      I'd like to see someone try to walk on it.
      You go first.
    11. Re:Lava-proof by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Plain old tungsten.

    12. Re:Lava-proof by MrIcee · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • Although i'd like to see someone try to walk on [lava]

      You might find our instructions for walking on hot lava here most useful. We also pick it up using special kevlar and spun glass gloves that can withstand 2000 F for 20 seconds without breaching.

      Aloha

    13. Re:Lava-proof by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      So lesse, you make a business of playing with molten rock in Hawaii, yet your handle is "Mr. Icee"?

      Heh. I wish we could mod handles on /. the way we mod comments, although we'll probably need slightly different categories for them. Either way, yours would get "+1 [something]" from me. :)

    14. Re:Lava-proof by MrIcee · · Score: 1
      heh... well, to clairfy for you. Years ago on IRC i used 'iceman' as a nick (ice as in security), but often had it squated on by others. One day someone suggested MrIcee and it stuck. That was before I moved to Hawai'i.

      However, in Hawai'i there is also a rather well known Shaved Ice company named, strangely enough, Mr Icee - so the named worked here as well.

  7. Quick mover by goneutt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the most important part of this article and development is the fact that the pure research came up with the knowledge last year, and has quickly produced a working model. I think it's a good show of the need for pure research in all fields of science, but it ain't gonna win a nobel prize.

    Since these little things rely on some form of surface tension, will a surfact tension modified such as oil or soap affect them.

    --
    Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    1. Re:Quick mover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree. tying research to marketable outcomes helps it to pay its own way but sometimes we just need to learn for the sake of it.

    2. Re:Quick mover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, metal wouldn't... But what about ceramics?

    3. Re:Quick mover by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look a little closer at the article from last year. The scientists had already produced a working model then. This is a dupe, either by slashdot, or by the person making another robot.

  8. I knew it! by secretsquirel · · Score: 5, Funny

    This just confirms what I've long suspected. Jesus was a robot.

    1. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that you have a terrible sense of humor.

    2. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Jesus was the Son of God and the Son of Man. His occupation was carpentry, and his passion was to serve God's will.

    3. Re:I knew it! by aelbric · · Score: 1

      Lighten up. Even Jesus had a sense of humor.

      WWJLA? (What would Jesus Laugh At?)

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    4. Re:I knew it! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not if he was a robot.

    5. Re:I knew it! by donbrock · · Score: 1

      Not if he was a robot. Why not? Data developed one so that proves it could happen.

    6. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data didn't "develop one." He had to get a hardware upgrade.

    7. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, I always thought that Jesus was Chow-Yun Fat. However, our theories could be compatible if Jesus was a robotic Chow-Yun Fat. That would explain the water-walking robot part at least.

    8. Re:I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Jesus was just some ordinary dude. I don't even think that he ever claimed to be the son of the human fabricated entity known as "god".

  9. Re:Pictures? by beeglebug · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It might not be immediately usefull, but anything that pushes robotics into new areas is good in my book.
    We've already done walking, flying and swimming bots, so why not skimming?

  10. They'd already put this in practice last year! by yjo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The BBC link from the previous article clearly shows a robot was successfully made in 2003 -- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3126299. stm

    1. Re:They'd already put this in practice last year! by beeglebug · · Score: 1

      Doh, I posted that link and never noticed it was a different robot...

  11. NEWSFLASH by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Groundbreaking new robot crucified by Romans.

    Film at Eleven.

    1. Re:NEWSFLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groundbreaking new robot crucified by Romans.

      Film at Eleven.


      And the name of the film is The Passion of the Robots.

    2. Re:NEWSFLASH by ciscoeng · · Score: 5, Funny

      Robot back from recycling plant.

      Film at Twelve.

    3. Re:NEWSFLASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robot claims to be the son of the great Dissassembler on the Sky.

      Film at Thirteen.

  12. Water walking by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

    One day Jesus and Moses are out on the heavenly golf course. Moses hits a wicked slice, right into a water hazard. He parts the water, retrieves his ball, and hits a great shot right onto the green. Jesus tees up, and hits into the same water hazard. Jesus confidently walks out onto the water, but sinks like a rock. Moses helps him out of the water, coughing and spluttering. "What happened?" says Moses. Jesus replies, "I didn't have these damn holes in my feet last time."

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Water walking by pjt33 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Peter and Jesus are playing golf, and Jesus is trying out the "visualisation" technique. At the fourth hole Peter, knowing he won't hit over the lake, hits his ball just short of it. Jesus decides to hit over it, and muttering to Himself, "Think Tiger Woods! Be Tiger Woods" hits the ball smack into the middle of it. He then walks out, bends down, and fetches His ball.

      Peter generously allows Him to retake the shot, and Jesus again mutters to Himself, "Think Tiger Woods! Be Tiger Woods! I am Tiger Woods!" and hits the ball three quarters of the way across the lake. Sighing, He goes off to fetch it again.

      "This really is the last time I'm going to let You retake it," Peter informs Him on His return. "Why not play it safe?" But since the visualisation improved the distance He hit so well last time, Jesus decides to give it another shot. "I am Tiger Woods! I am Tiger Woods" - and He hits the ball just short of the far bank.

      While He's off fetching his ball again, the pair behind them on the course catch up with them, and see Jesus walking across the lake to retrieve His ball. One of them asks Peter, "Who does your partner think he is - the Son of God?" Peter sighs. "No, it's worse than that: He thinks He's Tiger Woods."

    2. Re:Water walking by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jesus and Moses are playing golf one Saturday with an old friend. Moses tees up first, and hits his ball straight at the water hazard. He lifts his driver up and immediately the waters part, the ground dries up, and his ball rolls right to the green, mere feet from the cup

      Jesus is up next. He takes his shot and, again, the ball heads straight for the water. Jesus calmly raises his hand and the ball skims smoothly across the surface of the water and rolls onto the green, just inches from the hole.

      Finally, the old man is up. He takes his drive and, sure enough, his ball heads straight for the water hazard. The old man calmly nods his head and a trout jumps out of the water, grabs his ball in its mouth, and splashes back into the water. At that moment a bald eagle swoops down on the trout and snatches him out of the water. The eagle streaks into midair, where he is struck by lightning, dropping the trout onto the green, where the ball pops out of its mouth and rolls into the cup.

      Jesus turns to the old man and says, "Nice shot, dad."

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    3. Re:Water walking by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Jesus and Moses are out golfing. This is the first time for Jesus. Jesus says he's watched Jack Nicklaus do it, and it can't be that hard. They both go Earth and go anonymously to a local golf course.

      Well, he continually slices and hooks and skulls the ball. He keeps getting more and more frustrated, all the time muttering "If Jack Nicklaus can do this, so can I..." Finally, he hits a particularly bad drive in a water hazard. "My Dad Damnit!!!" He exclaims, "I am NOT taking a drop" and he strides out over the water to the where the ball went in.

      Just then a golfer from the foursome behind them says to Moses, "Who does he think he is, Jesus Christ?"

      To which Moses replies, "No, he thinks he's Jack Nicklaus"


      Try the veal folks, I'll be here all week, and don't forget to tip your waitperson!

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    4. Re:Water walking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite Jesus-golf joke:

      Jesus and Moses go out to play a round. Jesus tees up, and hits an awful slice. It bounces off a tree, strikes a turtle, and starts rolling towards a fox, who picks it up and starts running. A tree branch falls and hits the fox, who drops the ball; a crow picks it up. It flies over the green, where it gets hit by lightning; the ball falls down into the cup.

      Moses looks at Jesus and says, "Are we gonna screw around all day or are we gonna play some golf?"

  13. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one welcome our new water walking robot overlords.

  14. Umm, yes, but... by Angostura · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Sitti and other researchers imagine that his water-skimming robot could be used on any still water. With a chemical sensor, it could monitor water supplies for contamination or other toxins; with a camera it could be a spy or an explorer; with a net or a boom, it could skim contaminants off the top of water." ... if only someone could invent some kind of, oh, I don't know... radio controlled boat.

    1. Re:Umm, yes, but... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agree in many ways... I think these jobs can be done already by boats, although the feleing is that if it's SKIMMING the water, it is not penetrating the miniscus (spag?), so wouldn't get eroded or contaminate any chemical mixture...

    2. Re:Umm, yes, but... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It would get kind of wet the moment it got close to any chemical that decreased surface tension.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Umm, yes, but... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Meniscus. I thought it was funny that you had two separate posts on this story that both wondered whether you were spelling the word correctly. :)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  15. Re:Connect the dots for me.... by node+3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you saying Jesus was a robot???

    No, just his followers.

  16. Re:Pictures? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    i think the problem with skimming is that it relies on very specific conditions...

    - the robot has to be VERY light
    - the robot has to be very small ...Otherwise you're risking breaking the miniscus (spag?).......in theory, it would be good as something to explore a watery area undetected (i.e. it creates very little wake) or just to travel through shallow (5mm) water, but i'd like to see a true application of said robot...

  17. Mosquito-killer by 't+is+DjiM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would be nice to combine this with the insect-eating robot that was mentioned a few days ago.

    Bye bye mosquito's!!

    --
    --Use ant to make .war
  18. Re:Pictures? by HalfFlat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Still trying to figure out why this is a useful invention though...
    I wonder if down the track robots like this might be used to keep mosquito populations down?

    Develop immunity to that!
  19. Re:Pictures? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    It could be positioned in a mosquito filled lake... then quite cleverly skim accross water systematically and send a sharp, high frequency signal accross the surface of the water.... i think that might just work :-)

  20. Handy for swimming pool owners... not really by dj42 · · Score: 1

    At first I thought "Why not have one of these with a wireless transmitter, testing for PH imbalance, chlorine levels, even surface temperature, and then sending it back to some sort of auto-clronie / ph adjustment / heater system..." Then I realized, you could build the testing into the distribution system. So, anyway, what's this for again?

    --
    We are one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. Back to you with the weather, Bob!
  21. Re:Pictures? by guttergod · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pack it with a radar and a mini-gun. Then you can watch it frag those bugs running around on your garden fountain.

    --

    Apple built a platform for their ideas, Google built one for everyone's.

  22. Remember kids: by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're ever chased by water-walking killer robots from the future, just throw some soap or detergent in the water to mess up the surface tension. They never plan for that! (This might also work for water-walking religous figures, but I wouldn't recommend it.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Remember kids: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was thinking somethine easier, like don't go near the water.....

    2. Re: Remember kids: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > (This might also work for water-walking religous figures, but I wouldn't recommend it.)

      Just remember not to cast Water-to-Wine while your Walk-on-Water is in effect. You'll sink like a rock.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Remember kids: by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      (This might also work for water-walking religous figures, but I wouldn't recommend it.)

      A Baptist minister, Anglican vicar, and Roman Catholic priest are out on the lake fishing. The minister realizes the left his thermos of coffee on the shore, so he gets out the boat, walks across the water to shore, and gets his coffee. The priest is amazed by this. Then the vicar discovers he's left his sandwiches in his car, so he gets out of the boat, walks across the water to his car, and gets his sandwiches. The priest is stunned by this modern miracle.

      Then the priest finds that he's out of sunscreen. He knows that he has a spare bottle back on shore. He thinks to himself that if the minister and vicar can both walk on water, then he as a good Roman Catholic with faith can do the same. So he steps out of the boat... and instantly starts sinking. As he's thrashing about yelling to the others to pull him back in the boat, the vicar turns to the minister and says, "I guess he doesn't know where the rocks are..."

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:Remember kids: by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It's all part of my cunning plan...

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Remember kids: by cfuse · · Score: 1

      Jesus vs. Soap. FIGHT!

  23. so why not by bomdemais · · Score: 5, Funny

    just use legs that float?

  24. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    a beowulf cl.... nah, better not...

  25. capsula? by drewbradford · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was little I had a capsula ( http://www.discoverthis.com/capsula.html ) set that could walk on water... didn't anyone else?

    Oh -- it looks like they're still being made... I guess it's time to find out my Visa's credit limit.

    1. Re:capsula? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Woow! I think I saw these once, a really really long time ago. I only have a very faint memory of them, and I've always wondered what they were. Thank you so much!

      --
      Martin
    2. Re:capsula? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did own a set of those :)! They seriously kicked ass! I'm glad to see they are still making them. I just have to make sure my future kid will have plenty of Legos and Capsela's to play around with.

      Like father like son :).

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:capsula? by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      That rocks! I grew up in England, where these were hard or impossible to find. Luckily (well, for the purposes of this discussion) my Dad kept going on 4-6 month business trips to the 'states (thanks a bunch, TI). Anyway, he'd always come back with a guilt-offering of the largest, niftiest capsela stuff available. Way fun, and yes, I remember fondly those big yellow floats. And the joys of slowly running out of the hexagonal connectors as they cracked.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    4. Re:capsula? by syukton · · Score: 1

      capsela. with an E. I believe it's a product of non-american origin which offers alternative spelling, but I agree whole-heartedly that capsela owns. I have a 1000 set (They seem to call it the Max-Out 1000 these days) in my closet.

      I always liked the modular system. LEGO blocks were cool, but Capsela offered more versatility in terms of what you could build and how well it would stand up to the environment.

      I often wonder why more things aren't modular.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    5. Re:capsula? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Capsela! And on the upside everything you built would look exactly like a space station or unmanned submarine!

    6. Re:capsula? by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      i had that one, the one with round little yellow orbs? i used to build ones that would be able to submerge under water partially to move around. i forgot all about those things

  26. Related Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peter, John, and Jesus are sailing on the Galilee. As the trio near the shore, Jesus hops from the boat and calmly walks across the water to dry ground. He turns to his apostles and calls, "Come!"

    Without a moment's hesitation John jumps from the boat and strides confidently to the shore and takes up position next to Jesus. They embrace, turn and both implore Peter, "Come!" Peter cautiously steps out of the boat and after not even a step sinks to the bottom.

    John asks, "Master, should we have told him where the rocks are?"

  27. I may as well nitpick... by Trackster · · Score: 1
    Before someone else does:

    "Yahoo! News has a story about a robot built to walk on water, much like small insects, bugs, and of course, Jesus. The current robot is only a prototype, but more 'useful' robots are already being imagined."

    I've never met a bug that wasn't an insect.

    1. Re:I may as well nitpick... by calculadoru · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've never met a bug that wasn't an insect

      You've never used Windows then, have you?

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    2. Re:I may as well nitpick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never met a bug that wasn't an insect.

      Indeed. A bug is an insect that sucks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoptera

    3. Re:I may as well nitpick... by Speare · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've never met a bug that wasn't an insect.

      The word 'bug' is a slang word, a colloquialism. It can be any unseemly crawly thing, from insects to arachnids (spiders, scorpions) to worms to germs (the flu bug) to crustacea (mud bugs). Flaws in designs are also regularly called bugs.

      The word 'insect' refers to a specific Linnaean branch of taxonomy, the class of Insectidae. Members of this class, at adult stage, have a three-segment body, six legs, antennae, and functional or non-functional wings. A spider is not an insect, for example, but a walking-stick is.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  28. Ice? by KrunZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey it's nothing special. My AIBO did that last winter without any problems.

  29. Not that interesting... by Sidicas · · Score: 0

    I'll really be impressed if they can also make the robot summon shiny creatures and look, act and talk exactly like Yuna from Final Fantasy X.

  30. Wow by Viggeh! · · Score: 0

    My own personal jesus?

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to start any blasphemous rumours.

  31. Nice but no sigar by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1, Funny

    2000 years ago Jesus was a carpenter

    His dad was the carpenter. He was just "On top of the world."

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  32. Jesus didn't walk on the water by G�tz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The story about Jesus walking on the water results from a translation error, in the original version he was simply swimming, no miracle at all.

    1. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by someme2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...in the original version he was simply swimming, no miracle at all.

      One of the few cases where the second version is more interesting than the original.

      --
      You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
      Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    2. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose next you will be telling me the water to wine was the result of a zero day root exploit?

      Or the feeding the 5000 was a result of a W32.welchia ancestor inside a dodgy scroll?

      I can just see it now

      Subject: "Are you hungry?"
      Bodytext: "Open this attachment now to feed yourself and your family"

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story about Jesus walking on the water results from a translation error, in the original version he was simply swimming, no miracle at all.

      And your source for this? Please include citations of the Greek (and Aramaic, if the theory in question relies on an Aramaic original), preferably both the standard text and the reconstructed "original" where he swims, plus peer-reviewed scholarly articles supporting the theory, and any appropriate criticisms of the theory plus rebuttals where in existance.

      If you can't produce all that, I'll have to conclude that your view is every bit as based on "faith" and "mindlessly listening to what someone told you" as the Christians' view that Jesus walked on the water is, and therefore your claim can safely be ignored.

    4. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      simply swimming ....in the middle of the Mediterranian Sea...in a storm...so far from shore experienced fishermen in a boat were sure they would die...riiiiiiiight

    5. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Bob(TM) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Doubtful.

      The most prevalent form of the Matthew text is Greek (the most widely understood written language in the region). The Greek word used in the Matthew text is transliterated "peripateo" - to walk. The Greek word for "swim" is transliterated "kolympo" - to bathe or swim.

      However, tradition strongly suggests that the original Matthew writings would have favored Hebrew (highly plausible - given his background). If so, it's original form is lost. Yet, there are distinct words for walk and swim in Hebrew, also. Translators understanding both languages would have been able to avoid a confusion pretty easily.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    6. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by G�tz · · Score: 1

      You're taking this pretty seriously, aren't you? Anyway, it doesn't really matter for me what was written in that old book, there are more interesting things to do like drooling for a robot that can walk on the water :-)

    7. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever - it was a long time ago, he's dead now, and his followers all seem to be perverting everything he allegedly stood for so it's kind of neither here nor there.

    8. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Angstroem · · Score: 1
      The most prevalent form of the Matthew text is Greek (the most widely understood written language in the region). The Greek word used in the Matthew text is transliterated "peripateo" - to walk. The Greek word for "swim" is transliterated "kolympo" - to bathe or swim.
      You are, of course, perfectly aware that Matthew is by no means an original source but just the guy who first took the time to wrote down those Aramaeic telltales he's been hearing so often.

      The bible is full of translation errors; the most well known is probably the one with the camel that goes through the eye of a needle.

      Other stuff was placed in deliberately to substantiate the leading role of the "professional church": the stuff about "you're Petrus, the rock I will build my church upon" is pure hogwash and actually completely against the original Christian ideas which did not include any sort of professional church organization. In fact, that was one of the really novel things about early Christianity that professional priests (like Rabbis) and especially no "super leader" (which is nowadays referred to as "the pope") are not only not needed but even unwanted.

    9. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Bob(TM) · · Score: 1

      You're taking this pretty seriously, aren't you?

      Couldn't tell how serious you were.

      Just like your original post suggested, people often read different things into the words you use.

      I dig the robot, too ... but, there's some pretty interesting stuff in that old book.

      --

      The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
    10. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by G�tz · · Score: 1
      I dig the robot, too ... but, there's some pretty interesting stuff in that old book.
      Sure, the commandment about not killing is pretty interesting. Unfortunately it's most of the time interpreted as justification for crusades and death penalty. I'm really happy that I'm not in the church anymore.
    11. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "The bible is full of translation errors; the most well known is probably the one with the camel that goes through the eye of a needle. "

      Ignorance is bliss isn't it? this isn't a translation error. The "eye of a needle" was the name of one of the entrances into Jerusalem where a camel would have to get onto its knees in order to actually fit through the gate.

    12. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the context of the scripture, the claim that he was swimming, rather than walking, just doesn't work. Even if you don't believe it really happened, you can't just replace "walking" with "swimming" and have it make sense in the passage.

      The disciples saw it as something extraordinary. In fact, they were terrified (thinking he was a ghost). If they simply saw a swimmer on a stormy lake, they wouldn't have been terrified...they probably just would have tried to rescue him.

      Passage liked to below -

      Matthew - http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language =english&version=NIV&passage=matthew+14%3A22-3 6

      Mark - http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language =english&version=NIV&passage=Mark+6%3A45-56&x=11&y =13

      John - http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language =english&version=NIV&passage=John+6%3A16-2 4

    13. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mistranslation had nothing to do with the activity, it had to do with the distinction between "on" and "by". Jesus walked "by" the water, not "on" the freakin' water.

    14. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy I belive the story says he was on the Kinerret (galilee lake) which is about 1 mile wide at Tiverious and 2 miles long. There is some wind but nothing that I could ever think of as a deadly storm in this tiny lake. So swimming anywhere in this lake is VERY plausable.

    15. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by zoombat · · Score: 1

      Actually, for what it's worth, it wasn't the Mediterranian that Jesus walked on, but the Sea of Galilee. At 13 miles long by 8 miles wide it is large, but nothing like the Mediterranian.

    16. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by jb_02_98 · · Score: 1

      Also, just to add, isn't it also where they would have to remove all goods from off of the camel so that it would fit. That makes it teach the lesson extremely well when saying that the rich man would have a harder time than a camel going through "eye of a needle."

      There are some translation errors, which is perfectly understandable considering the length of the book, but that isn't one of them.

    17. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't walk on water because it's against all laws of nature to do so. If Jesus was alive today he would agree no doubt.

    18. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Number+110 · · Score: 1
      Actually, this is a great example of a translation error. The entrance is called either 'the needle' or 'the eye of the needle', I have forgotten which.

      The translation error is created by the miniscule error of altering 'pass through the eye of the needle' to 'pass through the eye of a needle'. It is the alteration of a seemingly insignificant (the the translator who had no idea there was a gate called 'the needle') word that radically changes the meaning of what was written.

    19. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot can an article about a cool robot be turned into a harangue about religion.

    20. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Chrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From what I've heard, the gospels never survived in their original forms (if they were more than simply oral tradition for a time) and the names of disciples were used to lend credibility to the texts, rather than accurately tell who recorded them.

    21. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure when swimming was "discovered" but this might seem like quite a feat. As opposed to drowning, anyway.

    22. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by jb_02_98 · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly each entrance that was built in this fashion was named eye of a needle. Though you could be right, either way, we know what was intended and we apply it to ourselves. Isn't that the purpose of this whole thing?

    23. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are numerus accounts within our own time (David Koresh, Heavens Gate) of the followers of a cult leader vowing that they witnessed miracles.
      This is just an early case of this. Jesus said he could walk on water and his folowers went along with it to the extream extent of making up stories about it.

    24. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately it's most of the time interpreted as justification for crusades and death penalty

      Read the book of Numbers in the Old Testament. It'll describe to you when the death penalty is justified.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    25. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people do not agree with you there:

      http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mrichman.htm l
      http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mrichma2.ht ml

    26. Re:Jesus didn't walk on the water by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "the commandment about not killing is pretty interesting"

      Actually the commandment is "Do not commit murder."

      Killing during war, self defense, and lawful execution by the government are all supported by the Bible.

      I had big problems with the Bible when I was hearing and reading the english translations. It seemed innacurate and sometimes downright contradictory. I now go to a church where we not only study the Bible from the original languages, but we apply proper interpretation techniques (isagogics, exegetics, categorization), and use systematic theology to codify and reference out interpretations.

      Rectifying the English translations with textual criticism is one of the most gratifying experiences I have ever had. The clarity of the Bible when studied in the original languages is amazing. Unfortunately most peopole who are in the "Church" do not take the time or thought to consider the original languages and the proper translation of the Bible. Most of them won't even study systematic theology so that they can frame their particular belief system in a logical way.

      Even more ironic to me are those people who, never having studied the original languages of the Bible or translation from the most accurate manuscripts, say they are disenchanted with the Bible. It is like a person blind from birth saying they don't like the color of your shirt.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  33. direct link to picture by clarkie.mg · · Score: 1

    The page of the project is on the site of the uni. Here is the cached version :

    http://www.google.be/search?q=cache:-PDGwjm17ycJ:w ww.me.cmu.edu/faculty1/sitti/nano/projects/waterst rider/+&hl=fr

    On that page they also have a video.
    -

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
    1. Re:direct link to picture by rasz · · Score: 1

      >On that page they also have a video.

      they dont :( but great www

  34. Bath toys by Nonoche · · Score: 1

    those would make great bath toys for geeks!

  35. Boat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why not just use a boat for anything this robot can do?

  36. The water-walker and the dead-fly eater by hachete · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18341

    umm - maybe they could merge, provide pool-cleaning facilities, say.

    h

    Perfect sig for sale - only one careful owner

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    1. Re:The water-walker and the dead-fly eater by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Skimming on the top won't do anything to clean your pool.
      It would need to be a swimming robot to manage that, like the basking sharks or whales.

      Plankton feeders, just idly drifting around filtering what it can find.

      Or else, it could be like one of those sucker type bottom feeders.

      Your right though, theres ample decaying food at the bottom of most pools, there should be some way to make use of it.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  37. Secret weapon... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    soap...
    Z

  38. We are all doomed by nnnneedles · · Score: 3, Funny

    When they put these robot insects out on a lake to monitor shit, they will not be killed by other insects. You know why? BECAUSE ROBOTS DON'T TASTE VERY GOOD. So robots are superior than biological creatures, and they will take over the earth and suck our brains dry (because humans are still yummy). And if that wasn't bad enough, we will all later wake up in a dystopian future and be forced to hang out with keanu reeves for the rest of our lives. :(

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:We are all doomed by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I have personally fried a number of robots and computers.

      I've also heard that in some eastern countries, aibo is a bit of a delicacy ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:We are all doomed by leerpm · · Score: 1

      That would require the robots to be able to self-reproduce.. now THAT would be quite a feat of engineering!

    3. Re:We are all doomed by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about, slashdotters self-reproduce all the time.

    4. Re:We are all doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I, for one, welcome... oh, it's not even funny anymore.

  39. I may as well nitpick your nitpick. by c4miles · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've never met a bug that wasn't an insect.

    Spider. Centipede. Woodlouse. Met any of these?

    IIRC, the major features of insects are having six legs and a distinct head, thorax, and abdomen. Many small insect-like creatures don't have these.

    There is an order of true bugs in the insect kingdom, but that's only one of the meanings of the word, and certainly the less used.

    Oh, and nits aren't bugs, either. Formally, they're the eggs of lice, not the lice themselves.

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Eight legs by spakka · · Score: 2, Funny

    This will be a bastard to crucify.

  42. We have this already by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's called a boat.

  43. Re: Your own personal Jesus by Sabathius · · Score: 1

    As log as your reach out, touch faith.

  44. Re:Pictures? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mosquito Terminator 1000 (in a tiny ultrasonic voice) "I'll be baaaaack." (Mosquitos spray it with detergent and it sinks.) "No, you won't!"

  45. You are stupid. by Id+Man · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well blockhead. If you know anything about insects you would know that bugs are an insectoid family. For an example, North American water beetles are a class belonging to the bug family. Grasshopers on the other hand are not. You really should take a second to study before you post a comment like that on slashdot. Honestly, evryone cool in the world is going to know what a dope you are now.

  46. Have you ever been forced off of your computer? by Id+Man · · Score: 1

    I was forced off of my computer by a thug who wants to make me look bad(Retro gamer).I apoligise if "my comment" offended you.

  47. Are you catholic? by Id+Man · · Score: 0, Troll

    You must be Catholic or somthing.

    1. Re:Are you catholic? by G�tz · · Score: 1

      No, I was raised as a protestant, but I've resigned from the church a long time ago. This has saved me quite a chunk of tax money.

  48. Cheap Robot by mindhaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sitti estimates his spartan prototype cost about $10 in materials to make.

    Great! So, show me how! :)

  49. Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just confirms what I've long suspected. Jesus was a robot.

    He was a waterstrider.

  50. ecologically correct by cerberos · · Score: 1

    they just have build this robot, because if they build one that opens the sea like moises they would have problems with greepeace

  51. Robot-Jesus by powerlinekid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fry: "So, what's the deal? You guys don't believe in Robot-Jesus?"
    Jewish Bot: "We believe he was built and that he was a very well programmed robot, but he wasn't our messiah."

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  52. water walking robots? by IrnWrk · · Score: 1
  53. Should be cool... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


    Ok, I clicked the links and read...but come one, can't there be a picture of this little thing!! I mean, it loses a little bit of collness factor when I can't see what it looks like walking on water.

    Really though, will this really be that important. I am guessing that any application of a water walking robot would require relatively calm and stable water conditions. That basically limits the times and places it could be used. I mean, we already have things that can "walk on water" and can be used almost everywhere...they're called boats.

  54. my roommate did this as an undergrad by Giant+Killer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Bah. My roommate did this three years ago when he was an undergrad at MIT for his senior thesis. He designed and built it himself. You can see it here. Granted, it is entirely mechanical, but dang it's cool. He's got a video of it going across water.

    Most recently he built a robotic snail that, in its current incarnation, actually goes completely upside down. Oddly enough, he calls it robosnail.

    Did I mention the dude makes his own swords?

    1. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      All that cool stuff, and all I could think of was this.

      "Welcome to Corneria!"
      "I like swords!"
      "Welcome to Corneria!"
      "I like swords!"
      "Welcome to Corneria!"
      "I like swords!"

      ...

    2. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Bah... the article is about your friend, dude.

      Unless there is more than one MIT team using a "robostrider" to learn about fluid dynamics.

    3. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fair! You had a cool roommate Every single roommate I had in college was a sub-human piece of trash who thought I was there to be their mother. I so went to the wrong college. Maybe I can build my own robo-jesus to hunt down and smite my old roommates...

    4. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by bchernicoff · · Score: 1

      So, I'm watching the video of his robosnail and thinking, "that's cool, but it doesn't go very fast." Then I realized it IS a snail after all...

    5. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      Snails have 3 modes of locomotion on solid surfaces: forward unduating motion, backward undulating motion, and galloping.

      Galloping??? Is that some insightful snail humor or is this for real? It's sorta funny because when I picture this in my head, I expect to see a snail moving at, well, a snail's pace, along with horse clop noises as it moves.

      Can anyone share any insights as to what snail galloping is??

    6. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Not to belittle your friend's efforts, but there is a difference. You're friend's implementation simply floated on top and moved in a straight line. The new robot actually mimicks the locomotion of a real strider. It's suttle, but there is a difference.

    7. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone share any insights as to what snail galloping is??

      Maybe the article is talking about racing snails...(Neverending Story reference)

    8. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      well, first you find yourself a snail. then you give it a coconut, cut in half to provide a percussion instrument for simulating the sounds of a galloping horse. then all you need is a quest.. yes.. a quest to find the holy grail!

      What is your name?

      I am Arthur, snail of the Britains

      What is your Quest?

      To seek the Holy Grail

      What.. is the average airspeed of a migrating swallow?

      African, or European?

      I.. don't know.

    9. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by True+Grit · · Score: 1

      Swords and robots...

      oohhh-kaaay....

      What is it with these MIT people anyway... is it the water up there? The air?

      :)

    10. Re:my roommate did this as an undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's suttle, but there is a difference.

      the irony in that statement is comical

  55. Oblig plif link by Bwerf · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    If noone rtfa, then what's the slashdot effect?
  56. It would also float by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure that this bot would also float (appart from water walking). It wouldn't make much sense otherwise, as a small wave, detergent, etc, would sink it. Also, I am not familiar with the dynamics of walking on water, but is walking on water more efficient than plowing through it like a boat?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  57. Source For Stat? by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    Where did you get this stat that they would have a mass equal to the mass of this planet? I don't think just getting rid of the predators would allow this to happen. Other problems would arise like where to get nutrients from, hell, even where to land when they got tired.

    1. Re:Source For Stat? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't verify it, but obviously it's just based on the growth rate of flies (second only to the louse, ha ha obscure reference), not on the actual ability of the ecosystem to support said growth rate. Maybe in some kind of Dimension of Flies, where the very ether itself is fly food.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  58. Robot? Tiny waves? by brufleth · · Score: 1
    This thing is not what I would call a robot. It has no built in...well nothing is built in except the actuator. It's like calling a hand tool a robot. Maybe when they get the power source and some programmability on there it'll be a robot or maybe I'm just being picky.

    More importantly I never thought water bugs stayed on the surface by "making tiny waves." I've lived near the water (both fresh and salt) all my life and I've known that bugs walked on water by not breaking the surface tension for as long as I can remember being aware of such bugs. I believe it was explained to me using bubbles and the meniscus seen in a glass of water as visuals. Who was confused about this until 1993?

  59. What the...? by FIGJAM · · Score: 2

    "Sitti's prototype is especially impressive considering researchers didn't really know how water skimmers actually walked on water until last year.

    The bugs support themselves on water because they're not heavy enough to break the surface tension of water, like a needle that floats."


    I don't get it. I have known this since I was a kid.

    --
    Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
    1. Re:What the...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "walking" is the method of propulsion, not the method of not sinking.

      Dumbass.

  60. Unrelated joke by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jesus was having a bad day in Heaven. He was concerned because more and more people of The Earth were using drugs. So he summoned his disciples to an emergency meeting. They talked and thought of ways to solve the drug-problem, but they could not figure out a way. So they decided that in order to solve the problem, they had to understand the problem. So Jesus sent his disciples back to Earth, with a mission top gather drugs from all corners of the world, so they could study them.

    Days passed, and Jesus was getting nersous. Then he heard a knock on the door:

    "Who is it?"
    "It's me, Matthew"
    "What did you bring with you?"
    "Crack-cocaine from Los Angeles"
    "Very good my child, come on in"
    Jesus opened the door, and Matthew stepped inside

    Then there was another knock on the door:

    "Who is it?"
    "It's me, Peter"
    "What did you bring with you?"
    "Ecstacy from Amsterdam"
    "Very good my child, come on in"
    Jesus opened the door and Peter stepped in.

    Then there was another knock on the door:

    "Who is it?"
    "It's me, John"
    "What did you bring with you?"
    "Khat from Mogadishu"
    "Very good my child, come on in"
    Jesus opened the door and John stepped in

    Then there was another knock on the door:

    "Who is it?"
    "It's me, Simon"
    "What did you bring with you?"
    "Heroin from Moscow"
    "Very good my child, come on in"
    Jesus opened the door and Simon stepped in.

    Then there was anothe knock on the door:

    "Who is it?"
    "It's me, Judas"
    "What did you bring with you?"
    "DEA motherfuckers! Hands against the wall!"

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  61. Robot Jesus by farnerup · · Score: 1

    Fry: "So, what's the deal? You guys don't believe in Robot Jesus?"
    Jewish Bot: "We believe he was built and that he was a very well programmed robot, but he wasn't our messiah."

  62. how supremely useful by korea · · Score: 1

    sophisticated engineering from the fyoochore! next up: AT-AT, let's make them walk- why not?

    --

    --

    "pain is weakness leaving the body."
  63. The Carnegie Mellon site with Pictures by Tetravus · · Score: 5, Informative

    The water strider project's home page can be found here.
    The CM NanoRobotics home page is here.

    Both have pictures of the bot and many others.

  64. Obligatory Futurama Quote by glindsey · · Score: 1, Funny

    BENDER: So you guys don't believe in Robot Jesus?
    RABBIBOT: We believe that he was built, and that he was a very well-programmed robot, but he was not our Messiah.

  65. well by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    It comes from MIT and CMU, so it probably just *thinks* that it can walk on water..

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  66. Welcome to /. by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Funny

    You must be new here

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
    1. Re:Welcome to /. by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Look who's talking :) 723822 > 11698

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
  67. Forget about the looney cult leaders.. by Alarion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we will also have robots proclaiming to be the second coming of Christ...

  68. yea, that's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it can in no way easily peirce the surface tension on the water's surface perhaps because it weighs so little."

    I somehow have a hint that you at least have some affection to entemology due your choice of words. I know and hope everyone else knows as you seemingly do, that a "living" Water Strider will only try to peirce the water surface when it needs to lay eggs (after mating, of'course).

    You are dead-on. The scientist quoted in the article is not using comparitive technology and if I was the weight of a Jesus bug then that means this robot is the size of CowboyNeal on balloon stilts. CowboyNeal, I love you as I would my brother; please lose some of that weight. I will pray for you.

  69. OT: "robot news week" by mwood · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read that and imagined robots reading the news on TV? (Then I imagined them doing it in the style of "Robot Theater" from _Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In_. /\/\/\/\/\)

  70. Obvious joke... by Wordsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our robot King of Kings and Lord of Lords.

    Of course, it would be much more useful if it could make the water into wine. Or maybe beer. Yes, beer.

  71. No patents! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now the good thing for us all is that it'd be pretty hard to patent this - there is some well-documented prior art, after all, dating all 2000 years ago.

  72. Yet another obscure American reference by Larthallor · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yahoo! News has a story about a robot built to walk on water, much like small insects, bugs, and of course, Jesus.
    You know, I'm getting really tired of Slashdot's American bias.

    Don't they know that not all of their readers are going to get their obscure American pop culture references? The least they could do is include a link to the guy's website, or something. Besides, I'm sure he could probably use a little publicity outside of the US.
    1. Re:Yet another obscure American reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Jesus was Latino...

    2. Re:Yet another obscure American reference by viral-contagion · · Score: 1
      I know (hope?) you are really joking, but either way here are some world religion stats, in order of numbers of worldwide followers:

      1. Christianity: 2 billion
      2. Islam: 1.3 billion
      3. Hinduism: 900 million
      4. Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist: 850 million
      5. Buddhism: 360 million
      6. Chinese traditional religion: 225 million
      7. primal-indigenous: 150 million
      8. African Traditional & Diasporic: 95 million
      9. Sikhism: 23 million
      10. Juche: 19 million
      11. Spiritism: 14 million
      12. Judaism: 14 million
      13. Baha'i: 6 million
      14. Jainism: 4 million
      15. Shinto: 4 million
      16. Cao Dai: 3 million
      17. Tenrikyo: 2.4 million
      18. Neo-Paganism: 1 million
      19. Unitarian-Universalism: 800 thousand
      20. Rastafarianism: 700 thousand
      21. Scientology: 600 thousand
      22. Zoroastrianism: 150 thousand

      But, this list is from 2002. I could not find a similar list from 2004 (although I didn't look too hard). Source: Adherents.com.

  73. Leave your religion at the door please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a robot built to walk on water, much like small insects, bugs, and of course, Jesus."

    You left out Elvis.

  74. Slashdot Failures by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    I have to agree that the Slashdot post is misleading at best. This is not anywhere close to being something 'new' at all. Yea maybe it's different, buts thats like saying that an xbox insn't a video game console because it is 'different' than a PS2. The point is that the Slashdot post was allowed to go up with a misleading point of view using an article that is in itself misleading. If you can get into CIA headquarters, or have been there in the last year, they have had an exhibit of their oldest insect bots on display for the last year. They make this thing look stupid and childish. That in turn makes the moderator who allowed this post to look as ill informed and childish. "Mommy look what happens when I put cards in my bicycle spokes! I invented it! Aren't you proud!"

  75. It's no so cheap... by jandrese · · Score: 1
    Sitti's robot weighs about a gram, or half of a dime. And so far, it's cheap. Sitti estimates his spartan prototype cost about $10 in materials to make.
    They're saying it's cheap, but it looks like the materials cost $20/gram! For American readers, that's ~$9,072/pound.
    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  76. Sounds nice by sulli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but does it run Jesux?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  77. what would evil robot jesus do? by evilmousse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dieselsweetie guestcomic by Steven Cloud just yesterdays' comic too.

  78. Futurama Reference by jzarling · · Score: 1

    Will this bring about the Good Book V.1

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  79. Jesus Lizard by macmurph · · Score: 1

    "much like small insects, bugs, and of course, Jesus"

    You mean the Jesus Lizard:

    http://www.cnn.com/EARTH/ 9603/leapin_lizards/

  80. Congratulations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just reinvented the frog.

    1. Re:Congratulations. by Fatal67 · · Score: 1

      But does nature have a patent on the frog?

  81. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..does it prove that Jesus was a robot, like I was saying all these years, or what ?

  82. Maybe I'm missing the point by serutan · · Score: 1

    With a chemical sensor, it could monitor water supplies for contamination or other toxins; with a camera it could be a spy or an explorer; with a net or a boom, it could skim contaminants off the top of water...

    Walking on water lets it do these things? It's a pretty cool accomplishment for sure, but I don't see how it's any more useful than other things that just simply float.

  83. Robot Walks on Water by edittard · · Score: 0

    Nana nana nah, the bastard sank!

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  84. Water tension:So Judas could have killed him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if he had thrown a bar of soap into the sea and drowned him?

    But maybe robots can't drown. I think I'll go an lie down for a few days in a nice quiet cave.

  85. Re:Nasty Relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem with the Arabs so quit trying to lump others in with you and stop using those silly code words like antisemitic, xenophobe, hater, supremest, homophobe etc. to label people; it's way past thin.

  86. Except... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    much like small insects, bugs, and of course, Jesus.

    Except this is real and one of the above is a myth.