Slashdot Mirror


Genesis: Data in good condition

Oxidation writes "Space.com is reporting that the Genesis satellite crash isn't as bad as it appeared to be in the first place. Furthermore, a prime particle-gathering device "appears intact" states Don Sevilla. (Genesis payload recovery leader at NASA's JPL)"

193 comments

  1. Thing is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the possibility of contamination, will most of the scientific world be taken the results gained from Genesis with a pinch of salt?

    1. Re:Thing is. by whopis · · Score: 5, Funny
      With the possibility of contamination, will most of the scientific world be taken the results gained from Genesis with a pinch of salt?

      Well, if they were not contaminated already, taking them with a pinch of salt would do the trick....

    2. Re:Thing is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No. That's like saying a parking lot is too contaminated with leaves to do a proper study of car color.

    3. Re:Thing is. by jwriney · · Score: 1

      with a pinch of salt

      With a clod of dirt, actually.

      --riney

    4. Re:Thing is. by mlyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When they were planning to do things like study distribution of oxygen isotopes from the sun, and they have nanograms of oxygen... probably exposing the probe to a 20% oxygen earth atmosphere probably isn't good.

      Likewise, with a few dozen micrograms of total material, tossing in several kilograms of dirt and doubtlessly several grams of fine dust inside the capsule will make determining what materials are extraterrestial in origin difficult indeed. Determining quantities of any substance which is more than a few parts-per-billion in earth soil or atmosphere is going to be extraordinarily difficult, and any results will be very questionable, unfortunately.

    5. Re:Thing is. by khrtt · · Score: 1

      I suppose, the results of the Genesis are essentially a pinch of salt even in the best case. Even, maybe, several pinches of different salts.

    6. Re:Thing is. by So_Belecta · · Score: 3, Funny

      But is the Clod of dirt insensitive?

    7. Re:Thing is. by isomeme · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in my chem student days, one of my professors had a poster on his office door offering translations of phrases found in technical papers. My favorite pair were:

      Pure: We only dropped a little on the floor.
      Extremely pure: We didn't drop any on the floor.

      NASA has now added this:

      Adequately pure: We slammed it into the Utah desert floor, but at less than 200 miles per hour so it's probably okay.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    8. Re:Thing is. by ms1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

      We slammed it into the Utah desert floor, but at less than 200 miles per hour so it's probably okay.

      Actually they tried to hit SCO but missed.

    9. Re:Thing is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA Press Release: Genesis is OK...we used the 5-second rule!

    10. Re:Thing is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Removing the contamination will not be all that difficult. Don Burnett, the Genesis Principal Investigator, has already called out to the semiconductor industry for help and there have already been responses.
      The solar ions are buried in the material at tens of nanometers depth up to around 50 nanometers. The contamination is a surface issue. The semiconductor industry already has ion sputtering techniques that can remove 1 nanometer of material at a time so this looks very, very doable.
      Also, the O2 in the atmosphere is probably not much of an issue. In order for O2 to react with the collector material they would have to be exposed to O2 and high temperatures. The re-entry of the SRC was too short and the temperatures inside the canister were less than have the 250 C design requirement so O2 contamination isn't even mentioned anymore by the science team.

  2. Kirk. Kirk, you're still alive, my old friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still... Old... Friend. You've managed to kill just about everyone else. But like a poor marksman you keep missing the target.

    1. Re:Kirk. Kirk, you're still alive, my old friend. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps, I no longer need to try admiral.

      I've done far worse than kill you. I've hurt you & I intend go on hurting you. I will leave you as you left me, as you left her, marooned for all eternity in the center of a dead planet...... buried alive. buried alive. buried alive.

    2. Re:Kirk. Kirk, you're still alive, my old friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      KHAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!! The lameness filter does not like Kirk's yelling. Nevertheless it is required for purposes of accuracy.

  3. Ha! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Funny

    And here Khan thought he left my probe as I left him!

    Buried alive,
    Buried alive,
    Buried aliiiivvveee...

    KHHHHAAAAAAAANNNNNNN!!!


    (So I'm feeling a bit cheeky today. So sue me. No, I'm not worth anything.) ;-)

    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were referring to this. They're not supposed to find it yet...but hey, it's in "good condition"...

    2. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory link:

      http://www.khaaan.com/

    3. Re:Ha! by samberdoo · · Score: 1

      But Kirk's son David is still dead. What is the solution for static Klingon?

  4. Good news from NASA! by nightsweat · · Score: 5, Funny
    No, not about Genesis.

    They just saved a ton of money on their car insurance...

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:Good news from NASA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For those not familar with American commercials, this is a reference to the auto insurance company, Geico, that has a string of advertisments similar to the above. It's actually quite annoying, but funny on Slashdot when used in this context.

    2. Re:Good news from NASA! by deman1985 · · Score: 3, Funny

      NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch, director of the Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster

      Whoever knew there'd be real Men In Black-- and they'd work for JPL?

    3. Re:Good news from NASA! by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "They just saved a ton of money on their car insurance..."

      Over who, though? NASA employees had been eligible to get insurance from Government Employee's Insurance COmpany long before said company opened their doors to the general public, so maybe their rates aren't as good as they imply... :)

    4. Re:Good news from NASA! by PriceIke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, if the data was salvagable from the wreck *without* parachutes and dangerous stunt piloting of helecopters, why bother installing them on future missions? Just crash the pod in the desert .. think of the money saved on explosive bolts, parachutes, inflatable cushions .. and hey sell the crash on TV to sponsors, or put it on Letterman.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    5. Re:Good news from NASA! by Cecil · · Score: 1
      Congratulations, you paraphrased exactly what the end of the story said (and will probably get modded up for it)

      The optimistic assessment led one reporter to ask if future sample-return missions might forego the theatrics of using Hollywood stunt pilots to make mid-air retrievals of capsules, and instead simply design the shells to survive a freefall.

      "The lessons from this one will affect all future sample returns," said Gentry Lee, a JPL engineer.
    6. Re:Good news from NASA! by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I added the idea of pimping it out for the entertainment value, so there.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    7. Re:Good news from NASA! by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't commented already I'd mod you up informative. Good show.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    8. Re:Good news from NASA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This joke is so May.

    9. Re:Good news from NASA! by thebudgie · · Score: 1
      In Britian, we "save a packet" on ours. And have done for the past four years. Same goes for home insurance, lawyer's fees, car insurance (even the sexist diamond car insurance- women only) etc etc.

      Honestly, I thought America was ahead of the times... ;)

    10. Re:Good news from NASA! by identity0 · · Score: 1

      "The lessons from this one will affect all future sample returns," said Gentry Lee, a JPL engineer.

      Speaking of sci-fi, does anyone know if this is the same Gentry Lee that co-wrote the latter part of the Rama Series with Arthur C. Clarke? I seem to recall hearing he's an engineer of some kind...

      Maybe by "future sample returns", he means a big honking cylinder full of robots and aliens, on a mission for God? :D

    11. Re:Good news from NASA! by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      MIB? Something tells me that that's probably not a coincidence...

  5. Probe by BoldAC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the beginning I didn't think this was quite as bad as people had feared. The worse case scenerio is that we can only detect particles that are unique to the study area.

    No matter how much dirt you pour into that system, any particles that are not common on earth would still be a very interesting finding!

    "It is amazing given the amount of breach in the canister just how clean it is inside" Sevilla said. "We're not talking about great clods of dirt."

    As much as they were overestimating the initial amount of damage, I think they are underestimating now. No matter how little amount of dust has entered into that system, it still has contamination. Contamination is like pregnancy. Either it is, or it isn't. "Genesis brought back a tiny sampling of the raw material of the Sun, a sample weighing no more than a few grains of salt." Likely many particles that were captured in space are similiar the particles here on earth; however, with the contamination I am not sure how you can seperate the true origin of the particles... especially when such small amounts are involved. Earth dust >>> sun dust.

    Can you tell which of these are covered with space particles and which are covered with space dirt?

    1. Re:Probe by tgd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The interesting particles are not on the surface of the collectors, they're embedded within the collectors.

      They just have to be very careful cleaning the surface, and they can still extract the trapped particles.

    2. Re:Probe by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      SUN dust can worm its way through the Internet and advertise itself on slashdot.

      Did we need research to know that?

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    3. Re:Probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      I didn't think this was quite as bad as people had feared.
      Well, you can't blame them; after smashing into the earth as such speeds, people expect the contents to be flat as a pancake. And the thing about armchair space explorers, is..

      [Damn, that was too much setup for this punchline]

      they're intelligent, but not experienced. That would lead to two-dimensional thinking.

    4. Re:Probe by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      1 2 3 4

      I's sorry, but I think these pictures tell a hilarious story! Photo 1 with the helicopters overlooking the carnage is quite good!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:Probe by stuktongue · · Score: 2, Funny

      The worse case scenerio is that we can only detect particles that are unique to the study area.

      I guess you didn't see (or read) "The Andromeda Strain."

      Just kidding, of course. :-)

    6. Re:Probe by g0at · · Score: 1

      "It is amazing given the amount of breach in the canister just how clean it is inside."

      Are you saying that some breach reaked into the cannister?! Werr... at reast this way we can be sure it is squeaky-crean!

      -b

    7. Re:Probe by Mignon · · Score: 1

      After looking at the fourth one I have to wonder why NASA hired Benny Hill to do such sensitive work. Ten bucks says that in five minutes, he's looking up someone's dress instead of brushing dirt off the solar dust.

    8. Re:Probe by jstave · · Score: 2, Funny

      While I understand (I think) why its necessary, it still seems kinda funny that they'd be doing the whole clean-room proceedure after pulling the thing out of a pile of dirt.

    9. Re:Probe by Daktaklakpak · · Score: 1

      well, good thing that guy is wearing a clean room hat. it looks like his hair has a habit of falling off his head :)

  6. Budget cuts by papasui · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see some bureaucrat using this as proof to cut funding from the space program. No need to invest in landing gear, just let it crash. :) But seriously that's a testimate to how well they build and designed it.

    1. Re:Budget cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crash itself could be used as an excuse for budget cuts, especially if nothing could be salvaged. "Look how much money was wasted on this, and they can't even get it back to Earth in one piece!" On the other hand, if the data are still good, then no money was wasted and they're doing a good job.

      Hell, faking up some data about solar wind particles is no big deal if it helps the space program continue, right? I wouldn't put it past them.

      I'm not one to buy into conspiracy theories, but I'm glad my life doesn't depend on the accuracy of the Genesis data.

    2. Re:Budget cuts by Drakonian · · Score: 2, Funny
      testimate

      I think you might be taking your knowledge of the English language for granite. ;)

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:Budget cuts by Radish03 · · Score: 1

      But seriously that's a testimate to how well they build and designed it.

      The fact that it crashed aside, of couse. :)

    4. Re:Budget cuts by WhiteBandit · · Score: 2, Funny


      I think you might be taking your knowledge of the English language for granite. ;)


      Heh. That wasn't gneiss. :(

    5. Re:Budget cuts by sjames · · Score: 1

      The crash itself could be used as an excuse for budget cuts, especially if nothing could be salvaged.

      If NASA wants to get creative, it could be used to greatly increase funding as in: "Senator, did you know we have dozens of things that size in orbit? Did you know we can make them land with an accuracy of....OH, about the size of a car?"

      Queue speil about accident insurance.

  7. lol... by here4fun · · Score: 5, Funny
    Genesis, which launched in 2001, carries a $264 million price tag.

    And to think I freaked out when I dropped my bookbag with my laptop inside it. They should have used something better than a parachute.

    1. Re:lol... by romper · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually it wasn't the parachute that was the problem. I it was the *battery* that was supposed to trigger an explosive charge the deploy the parachute that was the problem.

      Should've gone with the Copper-Top! (TM) =)

      --
      Right is wrong when left is right.
    2. Re:lol... by Sewer+Panda · · Score: 1

      I'm just amazed that for $264 million they couldn't afford...at least two parachutes? Other space probes have hi-tech backup computer systems, hi-tech backup power systems...but it doesn't mean much if they data they are carrying can't make it back to earth because of low-tech landing gear.

      --
      I have neither class nor rank. I am unique.
    3. Re:lol... by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      They left the price tag on it?! I hate when I buy some clothing and forgot to remove some harrd to see tag or sticker and realize later I've been walking around all day with a tag saying "36x30" 10 times on my ass.

      No wonder the probe chose to off itself.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    4. Re:lol... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i know, and at £1 for a pack of 4 duracel AA batteries, surely they could have taken off a little bit of the soar panels or something to compensate.

      but seriously, it probably has something to do with weight - a heavy extra battery would require much more fuel, which would cost much more.

    5. Re:lol... by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      Actually, they had three backup explosives which were supposed to go off. But none of the three succeded.

      Another parachute and another 3 explosives would've added a lot to the weight. (someone fill me in of the calculated cost per kilo)

  8. That's a huge relief. by everyplace · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, and I thought this accident was going to turn the project to dust. Oh wait.

  9. Great news! by keiferb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw the crash live, and figured that with how delicate all of the collectors were being made out to be by the folks doing the reporting, that it would be a near-total loss.

    It's good to see that at least some of my tax dollars went into some worst-case scenario planning. =)

    1. Re:Great news! by Nos. · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the engineers behind this one deserver a few pats on the back. Even though the parachutes never deployed and this thing fell to the Earth, there's still usable samples inside. Just goes to show that this thing was better built than a lot of stuff we use.

    2. Re:Great news! by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just goes to show that this thing was better built than a lot of stuff we use

      Well, the body of Genesis appears to be rather soundly built. Of course, the parachute that was designed to slow it down was not soundly built. When you think of it that way, your statement can be interpreted this way:

      "Hey, that's a well-built car! Except for the friggin' brakes!"

    3. Re:Great news! by Lattitude · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember back in grade 7 we had to devise a system that would protect an egg from a fall from the roof of the school. I think we used foam and rubber bands... or something.

      Anyway, the guys that built this probe probably kicked ass on that exercise...

    4. Re:Great news! by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      there was a junkyard wars episode where they had to build a rocket that would carry an ostrich egg and return it unbroken.

      IIRC, the team that tried a radical teepee design lost because their parachute failed to open and the egg suspended in a pair of pantyhose in the crumpled nosecone got scrambled.

      The winning team had a conventional design that had an impressive lift-off, had a nice recovery deployment and had a good payload compartment that protected the egg from the shock of landing.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:Great news! by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, the parachute that was designed to slow it down was not soundly built.

      I'll just jump in and be serious here -- actually, according to the article, the parachute was working, but what happened was instead a communications failutre. Seems like they couldn't tell it to use them for some reason.

      A semi-automatic thing knowing when it enters the atmosphere like the Spirit/Opportunity probes would maybe have been safer?

      But then again, this whole thing was designed to be a publicity stunt with a cool "catch" from helicopters as it came back to Earth. Which instead turned into lesson it seems like they've learned now when asked about it.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  10. Preliminary Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    After studying preliminary data from the recovered probe, scientists are reporting that the Sun seems to have originated in the Utah desert.

    "We're finding embedded silicon dioxide particles that are unique to Utah."

    1. Re:Preliminary Results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if Sun hadn't already paid them I'm sure SCO would be claiming this.

  11. First thought by qmchenry · · Score: 3, Funny

    The first thing I thought of while watching that video:

    "You're the ones who come up with this shit! Why, I bet you have a bunch of guys sitting around somewhere right now just thinking shit up, and somebody backing them up. What's your contingency plan?"

    And then I went, "eww," and had to look away..

  12. If only every American.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    had half as many brain cells as the average NASA employee, I wouldn't have to say this.
    Sorry world! I apologize on the behalf of the rest of us Americans who do have brains.

    1. Re:If only every American.. by DA-MAN · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a NASA Employee I gotta say that the average NASA employee probably has half as many brain cells as the average american . . .

      It's still part of the Government you know.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  13. Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scientists and engineers are optimistic after having peeked inside the Genesis space capsule, which brought back bits of the Sun but crashed into the Utah desert Wednesday.

    The craft was supposed to deploy a parachute and be retrieved in the air by a helicopter. Instead it broke apart on impact. Amazingly, scientists say, much of the contents -- microscopic particles that once rode the solar wind and are now embedded on shattered collector plates -- should be salvageable.

    In a teleconference with reporters today, mission officials said contamination is their greatest worry, since desert dirt entered the capsule. They need to retrieve the Sun samples in pristine form. The goal is to learn more about the Sun's composition and the history of the solar system and planet formation.

    The team might seek advice on handling the wafer-thin collector devices from the semiconductor industry, said Don Burnett, Genesis principal investigator from the California Institute of Technology.
    Surprise

    "We should be surprised that we have anything," said Don Sevilla, Genesis payload recovery leader at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

    Sevilla said experts are "peeling back the layers of the onion," using a flashlight and a small mirror on a stick to explore inside the fractured, garbage-can-sized capsule. A prime particle-gathering device "appears intact," he said, and another appears to be "in very good condition."

    But pieces of the fragile collectors are "strewn about the canister," so scientists are being very methodical about extracting them.

    "It is amazing given the amount of breach in the canister just how clean it is inside" Sevilla said. "We're not talking about great clods of dirt."

    No timetable has been created for moving the science samples from a Utah facility to a NASA center for ultimate study. Sevilla said engineers are still busy collecting tools to do unexpected "sawing and snipping" that will take place over the weekend.

    Genesis, which launched in 2001, carries a $264 million price tag.

    The scientists said they were demoralized when they first saw the craft stuck more than halfway into the desert floor. Attitudes have changed.

    "The science team is really excited," said Roger Wiens, flight payload leader from the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Wiens expects to "meet many if not all" of the mission's initial goals.

    The investigation

    Meanwhile, Sevilla said three pyrotechnic devices that were supposed to deploy the parachute system failed to trigger as planned. They have been "safed" to allow study of the capsule.

    "None had been fired," he said. "This points to a command and control problem," not to any failure of the parachutes themselves.

    NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch, director of the Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster. The group is due to report back in mid-November.

    The optimistic assessment led one reporter to ask if future sample-return missions might forego the theatrics of using Hollywood stunt pilots to make mid-air retrievals of capsules, and instead simply design the shells to survive a freefall.

    "The lessons from this one will affect all future sample returns," said Gentry Lee, a JPL engineer.

    1. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mission officials said contamination is their greatest worry, since desert dirt entered the capsule

      Conclusion: Based on the evidence, the sun originated on a desert in Utah.

    2. Re:Article by n9uxu8 · · Score: 1

      Well...they thought the undamaged disks weren't contaminated until they realized they had all been licked by Schrodinger's cat.

      Dave

    3. Re:Article by MasterDirk · · Score: 1

      NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch, director of the Applied Engineering and Technology Directorate at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster. The group is due to report back in mid-November.

      So, the Genesis MIBs have it, then. Very reassuring.

      Once they were protecting the Earth from the scum of the Universe, now they're protecting the sun from the dust of the Utah desert :)

      --

      "Programming is like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life."

    4. Re:Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I was wondering where I put that cat....

  14. Make money fast! by nizo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where can we bet on the fate of Genesis' twin Stardust, and what are the odds the same thing will happen to it?

    1. Re:Make money fast! by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who thinks they should have named the thing the Scoop 7? I think that would have been much more appropriate given what the thing is doing. Just make sure you're not in the little town where it lands or anything ...

    2. Re:Make money fast! by bob+the+gnomon · · Score: 1

      http://stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/top.html JPL page on Stardust

      --
      'Twas Brillig, and the Slith Toves did Gyre and Gimbel in the Wabe.
    3. Re:Make money fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not twins, just similar missions. Stardust is supposed to splashdown in the ocean iirc.

  15. That's good to hear... by Evangelion · · Score: 0, Redundant


    But how did he survive the explosion at the end of Nemesis?

  16. ObKhan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "There she is! Not so wounded as we were led to believe. So much the better."

  17. money saving recovery procedure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, now they can just crash their spacecraft instead of employing those expensive recovery procedures they normallu use.

    1. Re:money saving recovery procedure by Khan+Fused · · Score: 4, Funny

      And just hope that the next failure isn't in the reentry calculations.

      Because lawn dart in the middle of a Utah testing ground ... yeah, ok, you might bullseye a gopher.

      A lawn dart in the middle of Salt Lake city would be a hell of a thing to list on the morning traffic reports. "Aaaand on route-92 we've got all lanes blocked, after NASA's newest probe bulls-eyed a Silverado. Damage should be cleared out in the next two hours, but it'll take a week to get rid of all the idiot tourists. Suggest you take a different route."
      ____________________

      --
      This mind intentionally left blank.
  18. So why the parachute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This suggests that it might be cheaper and more reliable to add a bit more shock absorbency and not bother with parachutes and pyrotechnic devices that can go wrong.

    1. Re:So why the parachute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the next mishap that could, say, put the reentry trajectory of the capsule over a populated area.

    2. Re:So why the parachute? by Coolpup · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The capsule landed where it did because of the fault plans in the mission. Any re-entry mission has a backup landing site. Or a site where it is expected to crash if something goes wrong. They timed the re-entry so that it fell in a non populated area. The crash was not a mishap. The mishap was not triggering the pyros. The crash was a back up plan.

    3. Re:So why the parachute? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Put some big springs on the outside, give the copter pilots several chances at catching the damn thing...

    4. Re:So why the parachute? by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      How about some big air bags like the MERs.

  19. My ears are in better condition by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anything to get Phil Collins away from the microphone and strictly in charge of drums.
    Oh,the other Genesis...

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  20. Green A,lien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IS the Green Alien inside or not?
    The rest is just rethoric.

  21. Mirror and Stick? by dostert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who is disturbed by the line that they were "using a flashlight and a small mirror on a stick to explore inside the fractured, garbage-can-sized capsule." This is Nasa... they can't use a tiny camera in there? They have to tape a mirror on the end of a stick and peek around? Reminds me of a line in "Clay Pigeons" when Deputy Barney is poking a body with a stick and when asked why he said "I was just checkin' somethin'"

    1. Re:Mirror and Stick? by travdaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they learned their lesson from the space pen?

      During the space race back in the 1960's, NASA was faced with a major problem. The astronaut needed a pen that would write in the vacuum of space. NASA went to work. At a cost of $1.5 million they developed the "Astronaut Pen". Some of you may remember. It enjoyed minor success on the commercial market.

      The Russians were faced with the same dilemma.

      They used a pencil.


      (However, this space pen story is a fake. Snopes.com for more detail.)

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    2. Re:Mirror and Stick? by shfted! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does your dentist use a camera to look inside your mouth? I don't mean taking xrays. What's wrong with using an old technique if it works just fine? Yes, that's not typical NASA, but these are scientists looking at the wreckage, not bureaucrats -- and scientists tend to be more practical and creative.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    3. Re:Mirror and Stick? by jfengel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course not. That's a $26,000 triple-autoclaved, platinum-coated, Swiss optic mirror, affixed to a $43,424 surgical steel stick, made to NASA's exacting specifications down to the micrometer. The 3M company launched a whole new division to create the special cellphane tape (release strength 3.434 KPa +/- .002 KPa), $113,285 per yard (but they only used about six inches; the rest is being used to tape the fragments together).

    4. Re:Mirror and Stick? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 3, Funny
      This is Nasa... they can't use a tiny camera in there? They have to tape a mirror on the end of a stick and peek around?

      First reaction: Over-engineered solution. Why use a multi-thousand dollar miniaturized camera when a $2 mirror on a stick can accomplish the same task?

      Second reaction: Who am I to talk about over-engineering? After all, I spend my weekends geocaching, which is best summed up by this quote:

      "I use multi-billion dollar military satellites to find tupperware hidden in the woods...What do YOU do?"
      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    5. Re:Mirror and Stick? by Bio · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link to geocaching. I didn't know about this activity. It's fascinating to dig into it.

    6. Re:Mirror and Stick? by ShadowcatBlue · · Score: 2

      Does your dentist use a camera to look inside your mouth? I don't mean taking xrays.

      Actually, he does. My dentist has this small camera probe he uses to display magnified images of the hard to see places on teeth on a television monitor so the patient can see up close what kind of nastiness they've got on their molars and stuff. It's pretty crazy, but it does a good job scaring people into flossing regularly.

    7. Re:Mirror and Stick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dentists do sometimes take digital photos inside your mouth. It is much easier to show it to you that way.

    8. Re:Mirror and Stick? by anubi · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think I would have been sorely tempted to stop by the local hospital and borrow their colonoscopy apparatus, along with their doctor and technician who know how to use it. Its neat for seeing tiny things, and has recording capability.

      No joke.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  22. Sensitive NASA Instruments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Sevilla said experts are 'peeling back the layers of the onion,' using a flashlight and a small mirror on a stick to explore inside the fractured, garbage-can-sized capsule."

    A flashlight and a small mirror on a stick...only cutting edge technology will do for NASA...

    1. Re:Sensitive NASA Instruments by keraneuology · · Score: 1
      A flashlight and a small mirror on a stick...only cutting edge technology will do for NASA...

      What they didn't tell you is that it is a $5.7 million dollar flashlight and a $19 million dollar stick, specifically designed to contain only bits of wood that don't grow in Utah.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    2. Re:Sensitive NASA Instruments by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      The article says something about the "onion" being at a facility in Utah, not in a regular NASA lab. They're still assembling the appropriate equipment, so the mirror on a stick is just the first look to see exactly how many hundreds of tupperware boxes they'll need to contain the various fragments...

  23. $264 million dollars of spacecraft... by ttlgDaveh · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... and they attempt to catch it with a hook and a stick!?
    This is not a fairground, and you are not trying to catch plastic fish from a pond in exchange for a giant teddy-bear.

  24. What are they analysing? by Gilesx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah I've not really been paying attention to any of this up until now, but what exactly is in the pod? Is it physical material to analyse, such as rocks and dust etc, or is it media containing data such as photographs?

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:What are they analysing? by ctid · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a number of octagonal (hexagonal?) discs, about five inches in diameter. These were exposed to space during the vessel's trip around the Solar System. The idea being that they should pick up samples of solar particles for analysis back here on earth. I'm not sure what the discs are made of, but a reporter demonstrated how very fragile they were by bending one slightly and watching it shatter into small pieces. I'm happy that they have got some intact discs, but I wonder about contamination with desert sand etc.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    2. Re:What are they analysing? by p3d0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, you are one lazy bastard.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  25. Black Box by Feneric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess I'm not too surprised. Commercial airliner black boxes seem to be able to survive all sorts of crashes and accidents, and while I realize that the weight limits on components sent into space are far more strict than the weight limits on regular aircraft, I'd expect (hope) that NASA has better technology to work with.

    Of course there's also the differences between the scientific equipment used by NASA and the simple recording equipment used in aircraft, but again I'd like to think that NASA is on top of such things.

    1. Re:Black Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why don't they make the whole airplane out of the black box?!"

  26. In related news: by AnonymousKev · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The solar wind appears to be made of particles remarkably identical to desert sand.

    --
    Anonymous Kev
    Proudly posting as AC since 1997
    (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
    1. Re:In related news: by AnonymousKev · · Score: 1

      ...strange, my original post wasn't redundant before trying to post through the "Service Unavailable" errors.

      --
      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997
      (Finally got a dang account in 2004)
  27. Good Pictures by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I submitted the *exact* same story two days ago, BUT I'M NOT BITTER! Anyway, although the official web site originally had a bunch pictures of the recovery team with their unprotected hands all over the spacecraft remains, it seems they've moved it to a clean room...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  28. Local Paper got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    On an AP article, the headline read "Sun atoms may be intact after crash". And I thought the only way to split an atom was to bombard it with neutrons. Makes sense now why the conduct nuclear explosion tests deep underground.

  29. Obligatory 2001 reference by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the recovery, from another poster: http://www.genesismission.org/images/gen_recovery_ fragments-browse.jpg
    interesting... they appear to have collected shards of a large, shiny black object...
    (queue the trumpet)

    My god, it's full of sand!

    --
    stuff |
  30. Imagine sorting through that mess....... by ARRRLovin · · Score: 5, Funny

    (looks through microscope and sorts through particles with tweezers)

    Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Utah, Solar!, Utah, Utah, Utah......

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:Imagine sorting through that mess....... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

      Mushroom MUSHROOM!

  31. Which part was that? by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1
    Furthermore, a prime particle-gathering device "appears intact"

    Is that the part responsible for gathering particles from the Utah surface?

    Good news to hear in general...hope it turns up decent information.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  32. Priceless by hckrdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    1 Probe $280 Million Dollars 2 Stunt Helicopters $30 Million Dollars Watching a 280 million dollar probe crash at 200 MPH.... PRICELESS Money cant buy everything, but i bet this time it bought the lowest bidder :-)

  33. Sucks to be the parachute design team. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine the ass-chewing those poor engineers got.

    Maybe it's just the innate lack of confidence in human nature, but of course NASA's going to say that they were still able to get valuable information despite the crash. Their funding is probably on the line, and they don't wish to say "Oh yeah. That was a complete waste of money".

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  34. Kirk says by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Khan "Then you will transfer all data pertaining the project named..Genesis"

    Kirk "Genesis? What's that?"

    Khan "Don't insult my intelligence Kirk"

    Kirk "Im not, the enterprise "SuperComputer," is working busily to find money-saving deals for you. You can even name your own price for this 'Genesis' "

    Khan "Damn, I payed too much for staying at Ceti Alpha V"

    1. Re:Kirk says by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Khan "Then you will transfer all data pertaining the project named.. Genesis!"

      Kirk "Genesis??"

      Khan "Yes! Genesis! How can you be deaf with ears like that?"

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  35. Genesis: Data in good condition by pdkrocul · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Good News! I was afraid I was never going to hear the MIDI arrangement of "I Can't Dance" again. Oh...sorry. Wrong Genesis.

    1. Re:Genesis: Data in good condition by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

      Oh...sorry. Wrong Genesis.

      No, no you were right.

      here you go strait from NASA

      --

      --
      Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    2. Re:Genesis: Data in good condition by eutychus_awakes · · Score: 1

      Glad to see the "other" Genesis reference. I might suggest "Watcher of the Skies" as an appropriate alternate song. . .

      --
      This sig is a test. If this had been an actual sig, you would be reading something quite a bit wittier than this now.
    3. Re:Genesis: Data in good condition by aiabx · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a song "Digging in the Dirt" on a Peter Gabriel solo album?
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Prediction by pjt33 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Four days until Darl claims that SCO owns Java.

  38. Re: hook and stick by peragropax · · Score: 1

    There actually was no attempt made to catch the probe. The drogue chutes on the probe failed to deploy which made it impossible to effect any sort of a catch. (although you are right that the concept was essentially to catch the probe on a hook and a stick)

  39. A means of saving money??? by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Maybe a lesson here; Design your space probes to hard-land in the first place, and dispense with parachutes, helicopters, stunt pilots, etc...

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
  40. worst case scenarios by bani · · Score: 3, Insightful

    engineers often design for worst case scenarios, especially with space probes.

    i wouldnt be suprised if they engineered the probe in such a way that even in catastrophic failure (eg lawn dart) there would still be a good chance of viable data.

    1. Re:worst case scenarios by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Okay, that was one of the funniest comments I have seen on Slashdot in a long time
      ...that even in catastrophic failure (eg lawn dart)

  41. ...you think...? by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Geico will give me a quote for insuring a shuttle?

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  42. should be easy by bani · · Score: 4, Insightful

    should be easy to tell the difference between solar wind particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s vs dust particles which simply settled on the surface.

    1. Re:should be easy by Speare · · Score: 1, Troll

      I think you mean, solar wind particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s versus Utah dust particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s. Oh, hm, I guess there's a problem after all.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:should be easy by khrtt · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you mean, solar wind particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s versus Utah dust particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s. Oh, hm, I guess there's a problem after all.

      I think he means solar wind particles which impacted the collectors at several km/s versus Utah dust particles which the collectors impacted at several km/s.

    3. Re:should be easy by bani · · Score: 4, Informative

      no i actually meant what i said.

      utah dust particles didnt impact the collectors at several km/s.

      if that had actually happened, the probe would have been completely vaporized, there would have been a crater a hundred meters wide instead of a few meters. instead of the probe going 'crunch' as it did, there would have been a huge explosion, blast wave, and lots of dead bystanders.

      the collector was sealed, and only broke open after the probe hit the ground at only 200km/h instead of several km/s.

      so there's no problem after all.

      +1 insightful? methinks some /. readers need to go back and study basic gradeschool physics.

    4. Re:should be easy by spedrosa · · Score: 1

      The poster meant that the SOLAR WIND particles hit the collectors at seveal KM/s

      Maybe some slashdotters should learn how to read properly.

    5. Re:should be easy by BigDave81 · · Score: 0

      +1 insightful? methinks some /. readers need to go back and study basic gradeschool physics. Ohh yea like studying the projectile path of a kickball? What the hell kinda physics did you study in gradeschool?

    6. Re:should be easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The probe hit the ground at ~200km/hr or 0.05 km/sec. That doesnt sound like several kilometers per second to me.

      The solor wind on the other hand was hitting the probe at say 3-4km/sec. Thats 14000km/hr. So... a pretty big difference then.

      Like a poster below said, if genisis hit the desert at that speed there would have been a massive expolsion, and many dead bystanders

    7. Re:should be easy by Apro+im · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It may surprise you to know that outside the US, many countries teach relatively advanced science, including physics, in what we call elementary school. (By relatively advanced, I mean they may know that the vertical position of a projectile t seconds after launch is y0+v0*t-(10 m/s/s)*t^2 though who knows - depending on the country, they may know a good deal more than that.)

      For that matter, we do learn cheesy physics that young even here, but it tends to be in a very pop, sound-bitey way. For example, "electricity follows the past of least resistance" or Feynman's example of "energy makes it go!" neither of which are strictly true, but sound nicer than the truth.

    8. Re:should be easy by Apro+im · · Score: 1

      I'm also dissapointed that nobody realized that I'm an idiot, and it should be y0+v0*t-(10 m/s/s)*t^2/2

    9. Re:should be easy by captainClassLoader · · Score: 1

      Maybe one more iteration on this? - I believe the last term should be 1/2 * (a * t^2):

      y0 + v0*t - ((10 m/s^2) * t^2) / 2

      --
      "The plural of anecdote is not data" -- Bruce Schneier
  43. Another Successful Failure? by anandpur · · Score: 1

    I thought it was Stardust (sun is a star) or Data?

    http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/Academy/History/APOLL O-13/mission-report.html/

  44. But wait by Remlik · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to be too tinfoil hatted here but how can we believe anything they are saying?

    Who is going to verify their findings? What if this is all just some smoke and mirror news stories now so we all thing "yea they'll get something for the $260 million spent" only to never ever hear about it again.

    Before the thing even entered the atmosphere we had JPLers saying ANY crash would destroy the experiments. Well we got 200+ mph into the earth, split open, dust everywhere, broken little bits but everything is going to be A OK.

    Huh?

    --
    Apple free since 1990!
    1. Re:But wait by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who is going to verify their findings? What if this is all just some smoke and mirror news stories now so we all thing "yea they'll get something for the $260 million spent" only to never ever hear about it again.

      Before the thing even entered the atmosphere we had JPLers saying ANY crash would destroy the experiments. Well we got 200+ mph into the earth, split open, dust everywhere, broken little bits but everything is going to be A OK.


      There's a difference between "we can get useful scientific information from it" and "A-OK".

      There's also a difference between dust and other contaminants deposited at low speed and what's mostly monatomic gas implanted at high speed (look up "ion implantation" in a semiconductor fabrication glossary for further discussion of this).

      Processing will get a lot more difficult, as they have a bucketful of dust-contaminated shards instead of nice, organized, uncontaminated collection plates, but it's far from impossible.

      Just not an option the mission team would have chosen if it could possibly be avoided.

    2. Re:But wait by Remlik · · Score: 1

      I realize of course that there will always be SOMTHING to gain from things like this.

      What stymied me was the sudden turn around in two days that looks a lot like a PR move.

      I watched the prelanding interviews on several cable stations and these guys seriously got white and scared looking when asked about a possible crash, they knew, and still know that it would mean failure.

      Now we have cheerful guys saying no problem, the bits are just smaller, and the dust isn't so bad!

      I think we probably got about $1 million in research for the $260 spent but no one wants to admit it. Thats all fine and dandy with me, just let me know so next time we can say...give them $300 million to make sure the damn thing lands safely.

      --
      Apple free since 1990!
  45. parachute design not implicated in the crash by peragropax · · Score: 3, Informative
    Actuallly, the parachutes themselves are not implicated as being the cause of the crash. From the article:

    "None had been fired," he said. "This points to a command and control problem," not to any failure of the parachutes themselves.

  46. Clean room procedures? by FWMiller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, maybe one of you lab rats can answer this but...

    Call me irresponsible, but this guy went to all the effort to cover himself, then he leans over WITHOUT A MASK to work on a plate full of DUST!

    I need a mask!

    --
    Frank W. Miller
    1. Re:Clean room procedures? by peragropax · · Score: 1
      It looks to me like "the guy" (Dr. Don Burnett) is addressing at least one main source of contaimination. Look close now...

      Hint: think "pate."

    2. Re:Clean room procedures? by FWMiller · · Score: 1

      When I think pate, I think of an aggregate of material that hangs together, something that demonstrates viscosity. That stuff looks pretty dry and crumbly to me, like one good sneeze would mean a really bad day!

      --
      Frank W. Miller
    3. Re:Clean room procedures? by Politicus · · Score: 1
      The caption to that image says it all:
      Genesis Principal Investigator and Lead Scientist Dr. Don Burnett examines material recovered from the Genesis impact site.
      The operative words there are "lead scientist" which means that this is a photo op with some crap on a petri dish. The real work is being done behind the scenes by NASA's umpa lumpa's.
      --
      Politicus
    4. Re:Clean room procedures? by FWMiller · · Score: 1

      Whew!

      Thank God for cynicism, I can sleep better tonite knowing the hundreds of millions they spent to bring back a couple grains of salt are safe!

      --
      Frank W. Miller
  47. Is this REALLY the Genesis project? by chompadventures · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA also announced today that Michael Ryschkewitsch ... would lead the Genesis Mishap Investigation Board (MIB) in an effort to determine the exact cause of the disaster. MIB is investigating? This must be a crashed space ship, the whole Genesis project is just a big cover story. Thank you, Neurilizer.

    1. Re:Is this REALLY the Genesis project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word has it that the spacecraft had been hijacked by irate Lunarians.

  48. Hollywood ending by 3ryon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This begs the question of why they thought it was necessary to have the Hollywood stuntman ending (literally), instead of just designing a reentry vehicle with a low terminal velocity and just letting it crash into the ocean for a softer landing.

    1. Re:Hollywood ending by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      This begs the question of why they thought it was necessary to have the Hollywood stuntman ending (literally), instead of just designing a reentry vehicle with a low terminal velocity and just letting it crash into the ocean for a softer landing.

      They thought that there was no way a touchdown - even with a parachute [best way of getting a low terminal velocity] - would leave the sample plates intact.

      They were right.

  49. water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    couldn't they have crashed into the sea, I know thwe sea is very hard at the crash speed, but not as hard as tyera ferma.

  50. Scientists apply 5 second rule by servognome · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obligatory Simpsons' quote
    Homer: It's just a little dirty. It's still good, it's still good!

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  51. re: contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in a landmark scientific breakthrough, scientists have discovered that the solar wind contains large amounts of Aluminum Silicate... and termites.

    seriously: how are you supposed to isolate/measure the relative amounts of trace elements/isotopes (e.g. He3) from the 'solar wind' after schmucking the collector panels into the dirt at a couple of hundered kmph?

  52. "Utah Utah Utah... Solar!" by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Hey, maybe they should make a song about it, like this!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  53. Extra space material found... by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2, Funny

    For some reason, one of the datasets retrieved from the device is a human finger. Upon closer inspection, it appears to match other fingers collected from the Hollywood region of the southwestern coastal United States.

    NASA can offer no conclusions at this time, but one NASA insider has speculated that this may indicate that California may, at one time, supported life.

    --
    -- clvrmnky
    1. Re:Extra space material found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh like the young child with a nickle I wasted my mod points too soon.

  54. restraint by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll refrain from making a really bad Wrath of Kahn joke now.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  55. Can't land on earth? :-) by skaag · · Score: 1

    It's funny how we can land something on mars, that has a robotic vehicle inside, but we can't land a simple capsule on earth, with no vehicles inside.

    I think that for $264M this is a pretty silly mistake...

    Just my two grams of desert sand..

    Skaag

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

    1. Re:Can't land on earth? :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      >I think that for $264M this is a pretty silly
      >mistake...
      >
      >Just my two grams of desert sand..

      If you can design a system that can work after a trip to the sun and back, you should be working in space research instead of complaining here.

  56. Isn't as bad as it appeared to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I am really glad they were able to salvage something from this experiment, but please. "Isn't as bad as it appeared to be"? WTF! The fucking thing augered into the desert from freaking outer space! It was at least as bad as it "appeared" to be, probably WORSE!!! Dream up a worse case.

  57. told ya so by anser · · Score: 1
  58. Bad precident... by Rageon · · Score: 1

    With all the penny pinching within NASA, this could set a bad precident. From now on, return capsules will simply be allowed to ram into Earth. This'll save us millions of dollers in parachute costs.

  59. duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it broke apart when it hit the ocean, it would have sunk. this way we can pick up the pieces

  60. Achoo! *sniff* "oh, sh!t... where did it go? by TigerNut · · Score: 1

    Just another case of following procedures without really understanding why those procedures are in place. It's not like it's rocket science or anything...

    --

    Less is more.

  61. So then... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 0

    The Genesis Project is safe because Data rescued it?

    Chris Mattern

  62. just like my 3 yr old... by kencurry · · Score: 4, Funny

    wiping off candy he dropped in the dirt, saying "it's still good..." with just a hint of doubt in his voice.

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  63. D'oh! by Paul+03244 · · Score: 1

    umm...was I the only one who thought it was odd when they said they had *Hollywood*Stunt*Pilots* to do the retrieval...the deployment charges didn't work, but it's not as bad as they thought...Agent Muldar...Can you hear me now?

    1. Re:D'oh! by krswan · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a really old and well tested procedure. Old spy sats used to launch, take a bunch of pictures of the Soviets (with film that needed to be retrieved), and then parachute down and be snatched by army helicoptors. Now, civilian stunt pilots are as good as or better (and probably more available) than military.

      I'm sure that they must have had some chute failures too, and they were only up for a few hours or days, not years.

  64. Future scientific analysis... by eclectro · · Score: 4, Funny


    Future scientific analysis will show that the matter of our solar system is made out of a sandy substance that comes from a region of space called yootah. It is everywhere and permeates everything as we know it.

    This also has lead to new techniques at Nasa that will allow them to rescue expensive space missions with a pair of tweezers.

    All in all, I'd call it a good day.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  65. Not all that bad? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    Well hell, let's save a bunch of money and just crash all our probes into the earth. A little extra foam insulation never hurt. ;)

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  66. Where is the outrage at the waste of money???? by weedenbc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I mean come on. Everyone is pissed at the money being spent in Iraq (and yes I understand that I comparing billions to millions) but NASA still spent years of time and almost a third of a billion dollars to get some particles from the Sun and this is BEST idea to get their investment back safely that they can come up with??????

    When is this agency going to get off its ass and come up with something that is meaningful to our nation and humanity as a whole instead of just pure science? I completely understand the need for pure scientific research but that is only going to lead to the slow death of interest and funding for space research and exploration. Everyone mocks Bush for his manned Mars plans and while I agree that they have issues, at least the administration is trying to push the envelope a little bit. We went to the moon decades ago based on responding to a challenge and national will and we haven't done shit since.

    Just think of what could have been done with the money wasted on this project and the billions blown on the ISS if NASA had some true leadership, vision, and instituational courage to do something great. Instead we have a bloated bureaocracy that spends extreme amounts of money on safety and paperwork and STILL screws things up.

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
    1. Re:Where is the outrage at the waste of money???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Compared to iraq, Id say this is an extremely good return on investment.

      The occupation of iraq costs the US roughly 4 billion a *month*. That means the 250 million that this mission costs, would purchase approximatly 42 hours of occupation. *42 hours*.

      250 million doesnt seem so bad now does it? Esspesially since it seems that some valuable data will still be recoved.

    2. Re:Where is the outrage at the waste of money???? by maduro55 · · Score: 0

      I still tend to believe that NASA projects are a much better way to spend my tax dollars as opposed to the Iraq debacle.

  67. It's a Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I heard about the probe crashing on
    return I couldn't help but think of the 70s
    science fiction movie, 'The Andromeda Strain'.
    Great movie. If you've never seen it, the gist
    is that a space probe returns to earth, and
    unexpectedly, lands in/near a small town in
    Nevada. Of course the towns people open the
    probe only to unleash a virus upon themselves
    which kills all the people in the town but two.
    Well, I'll let you rent the movie to see how it
    turns out. But, the coincidental, even spooky,
    thing is that the Genesis probe returned to
    of all places, Dugway Proving Grounds. Yeah,
    odd huh. FYI, Dugway is where a lot of bio-
    warfare experimentaion goes on.

  68. HEY GUYS....I FOUND SOME!!! by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    aaaaaaaacchhooooooo! Oh.....ummm, don't worry, false alarm, everybody back to work.

  69. So it's management's fault! by dogfart · · Score: 1
    Th engineers don't get the ass-chewing, the PHB in charge of "command and control" gets the blame.

    Another first for the space program! Headlines: "Management Accepts Blame, Engineers OK"

    --

    "dope will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no dope"

  70. conflict of interest for NASA? by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when i saw the footage of that hunk of metal slamming into the desert floor, one thought came to mind: they are going to do whatever they can to make it look like they're getting useful data, because this was a very expensive screw-up, not too long after another big screw-up for NASA. sure, it's great to keep scientific purity, but if the scientific truth is "the sample is full of sand" and it means you could lose funding, wouldn't you be tempted to fudge a little?

  71. Needless pampering? by mlippert · · Score: 1

    Hmm, perhaps a parachute is a needless expense and we should land all spacecraft in the same way?

  72. LightSource, only $699 by Narphorium · · Score: 1
    "..scientists are reporting that the Sun seems to have originated in the Utah desert."

    Oh great, that's all we need. Now SCO will be claiming they own the sun. Expect to see LightSource licenses selling in the $699 ball-park within the next couple of months.

  73. Re:Project Scoop? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I've watched The Andromeda Strain many times - the way the pages riffle is really fascinating.

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  74. crash pic from nasa (yes, it's real) by sootman · · Score: 1
    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  75. ok this had to be said by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    i thought it was Spock that went in after the genesis module not Data. But i'm glad to hear that he's alright (even if he WAS blown up later)

    </ducks, runs, hides>

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  76. People occasionally survive parachute mihaps. by NerdMachine · · Score: 1

    Any crash you can walk away from is a good crash.

    --
    --NerdMachine